TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

BrSy Archive

View 2 posts and 196 comments by BrSy on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

Social media should still be impartial. Really mate? They're not public organizations. They do what they damn well please with their own platform - that's what freedom of speech is all about. Don't like it? Create your own platform. Government ties to prevent you from creating your own platform? That's censorship.
/r/MensRights05/02/17 12:07 PM
-13

Honestly, it's not censorship. It's twitter's own platform - they do what they want with it. Besides, twitter is not exactly the best place for spreading ideas to begin with.
/r/MensRights05/02/17 11:41 AM
3

Honestly, if anything, Milo has made me a bit more sympathetic towards feminists. He's nothing but an obnoxious troll trying to get a reaction out of people just to turn around and point fingers at them like the massive hypocrite he is. It's just sad to watch.
/r/MensRights05/02/17 11:34 AM
1

You could just instantly point out said hypocrisy when you encounter it.
/r/MensRights05/02/17 11:24 AM
9

The key is to live your own life. You can't change other people, but you can still make your own life enjoyable. It's better to just stay away from the idiots.
/r/MensRights18/01/17 08:04 PM
3

So I guess the shelters want mentally ill men so those mentally ill men can then beat their spouses, and said spouses then have need for women's shelters? Money money money. But in all seriousness this is disgusting and the fact that they don't what they just did might hurt their own customers as well makes them dumb as fuck. That or they do realize it and are just looking out for their profits.
/r/MensRights03/01/17 08:24 PM
4

Yep, he's a scumbag. And he doesn't really support men's rights either.
/r/MensRights16/12/16 05:42 PM
1

Meh. Languages with only non-gendered pronouns don't have this problem to begin with.
/r/MensRights14/12/16 10:07 PM
6

It's pretty usual that male immigrants get treated really poorly whereas female immigrants tend to have it a little better. Not to mention that most male immigrants take the dangerous trip so they could have the women and children in their families follow them safely through official channels.
/r/MensRights14/12/16 10:00 PM
6

Yep, pretty much this. As a medical student from Northern Europe, the way American healthcare works is absolutely disgusting for me. The amount of useless and even harmful procedures done there just to milk the $$$ is enormous.
/r/MensRights14/12/16 01:46 PM
1

So are false police reports and slander not criminal offenses in France?
/r/MensRights14/12/16 01:43 PM
1

Obviously we need to oppose things that hurt men. Why would you think that I thought otherwise?
/r/MensRights02/12/16 09:30 PM
4

I agree with this sentiment wholeheartedly. We should always keep in mind our actual goals. There's a lot of understandable anger in our movement, but we cannot let it become misdirected. We need to focus on the goal of helping men, and oppose others only when it serves that exact function. Opposing anything for it's own sake is a waste of energy. I disagree with you a little on the 3rd point, though. I think that the whole nature vs. nurture argument is quite moot. Both obviously play a role, a…
/r/MensRights01/12/16 07:40 PM
5

Fuck people who think like this. It seems they never stop to entertain the idea that it's notions like these that are actually dangerous. It's notions like these that stop us from having a unified progressive movement and drive away potential allies further towards the authoritarian right. And for fucking what? What a goddamn waste.
/r/MensRights21/11/16 04:50 PM
2

He's done nothing but defend gamers and in particular gamergate Yeaah... about that https://storify.com/x_glitch/the-gamergate-supporting-journalist-who-hates-game the woman was deliberately being confrontational and baiting him ... he acts like an arrogant ass to reporters precisely to bait them and annoy people like you, that's what he does So now you're criticizing the reporter for the exact same thing you give credit to Milo for? They're both obnoxious and this kind of discussion culture nee…
/r/MensRights20/11/16 04:00 PM
8

Yeah, and that attitude is not all that uncommon either, unfortunately.
/r/MensRights20/11/16 02:52 PM
1

Really? We can't make judgements on people based on what they say now?
/r/MensRights20/11/16 02:46 PM
1

Did you actually watch the video? He comes across as an arrogant ass. Same with every other video where he "destroys" someone. And it's not only feminists he attacks - where there's drama there's Milo. He's spoken in favor of male genital mutilation. He's vehemently attacked male gamers calling them overweight, beta male and man children among other things. He's spoken against birth control. He's defended pedophiles in the catholic church. He's spoken against gay marriage and said he would like …
/r/MensRights20/11/16 02:00 PM
10

That's why I say that if such a thing as rape culture exists, it disproportionately affects men. The problem is that many people have a lot of cognitive dissonance in regards to what actually constitutes as sexual violence.
/r/MensRights20/11/16 11:02 AM
3

Well tbh Trump did make statements awfully similar to hers. They should both be dismissed from any civilized discussion.
/r/MensRights20/11/16 10:51 AM
2

Well won't you look at that, she got convicted. Almost makes me feel like some progress has been made.
/r/MensRights20/11/16 10:32 AM
1

I'm perfectly aware that he's a troll. And that's not an excuse but precisely the problem. He's all about pissing people off and boosting his own ego. How does associating with scumbags like that help our cause?
/r/MensRights20/11/16 08:48 AM
4

He has no substance so what is there to acknowledge?
/r/MensRights19/11/16 09:19 PM
7

He's worse than the feminists. And after he's got bored of trolling them he'll come after you one day.
/r/MensRights19/11/16 09:02 PM
3

Wait - so how exactly is Trump helping men again?
/r/MensRights19/11/16 08:43 PM
-1

Milo is a fucking narcissistic alt-right scumbag. Why do you want to encourage that?
/r/MensRights19/11/16 08:11 PM
3

You think alt-righters care about men?
/r/MensRights19/11/16 08:02 AM
6

Why is this guy being praised around here now? He's not your friend.
/r/MensRights18/11/16 09:09 PM
1

What the main point of this article was supposed to be. Because I obviously missed it.
/r/MensRights20/12/15 03:41 PM
1

Could you clarify then?
/r/MensRights20/12/15 12:16 PM
-1

What a mess of an article. The writer starts off pretty well by comparing feminism and egalitarianism, but then goes on to ramble about evolutionary psychology. To question wether trans-women are women. And finally to talk about her own personal experiences with feminism. It's just really scattered. What's the actual point? It looks more like a random rant than an actual article. And a disgustingly conservative one at that.
/r/MensRights19/12/15 05:33 PM
3

Not the oppressed sex, but an oppressed sex. And the oppression of men is not a new phenomena either.
/r/MensRights06/09/15 11:35 AM
2

Here's the problem, though: By subscribing to anti-feminism and anger towards them you are already giving the movement power. Both over yourself and society in general. You dilute your own arguments by getting emotional, and the public will view you as raging misogynists. So trying to be femisits-friendly isn't going to help, but neither is directly opposing them. The best way to go about it would be to simply ignore them.
/r/MensRights15/03/15 07:47 PM
6

What is the article even trying to say? It's a mess...
/r/MensRights15/03/15 07:02 PM
2

Has become or has always been?
/r/MensRights15/03/15 06:58 PM
5

So I can't read George R. R. Martin anymore? :(
/r/MensRights15/03/15 07:47 AM
6

If that's what you want you should be striving to eliminate tuition fees.
/r/MensRights15/03/15 07:41 AM
3

At least you don't have that disgusting male-only conscription anymore. We still do.
/r/MensRights25/10/14 05:11 PM
1

What people who call themselves feminists say and do.
/r/MensRights06/10/14 01:17 PM
–

Well as an MtF, I'd tend to agree with the OP. Make of that what you will.
/r/MensRights23/09/14 04:39 PM
2

Education from LGBT perspective? SRS for underaged individuals? Vegan foods in school? 6 hour work days? I'm not necessarily behind any of this, but to call it "insane and discriminatory"? A lot of the goals are unspecified and could mean anything.
/r/MensRights16/09/14 02:08 PM
1

Red stockings.
/r/MensRights16/09/14 12:20 PM
2

Not all of the thoughts you listed are "absolutely insane or discriminatory ideas", though.
/r/MensRights16/09/14 12:17 PM
2

Get better friends?
/r/MensRights16/09/14 12:05 PM
3

Welcome to the anglosphere: The only place in the Western World that still holds on to victorian morality. Seriously. Time to update your laws to the 21st century.
/r/MensRights16/09/14 11:57 AM
-1

Because what the world really needs is more trigger-happy civilians with guns? I'd rather teach people better ways to defend themselves. Not ones that only lead into more bodies piling up (with a rather large likelihood of their own being among those).
/r/MensRights03/04/14 10:53 AM
2

You actually use books like these as learning material in some parts of the world? The rethoric alone is far from neutral.
/r/MensRights03/04/14 10:38 AM
-4

Sure, I understand your meaning, but for some reason it still comes off the wrong way for me. It contrasts you with the kind of people who actually do think themselves superior because of arbitary trait x regardless of your actual meaning. I don't exactly like the whole "LGBT pride" language either for the same reasons, despite being included in that group myself. It just seems like there should be a better way to get the point across.
/r/MensRights31/03/14 12:26 PM
-16

How is a random accident of birth something to be proud of? Just because it's not something to be ashamed of doesn't mean the opposite is true.
/r/MensRights31/03/14 12:12 PM
3

It's also easier for young women to get an apartment compared to young men. Private landlords tend to trust women to keep their apartments in better shape and public services that supply apartments to those in need tend to favor women as well. I was lucky enough to get a cheap student apartment almost immeadedly after sending an application despite living in the same city. The men I know that didn't have to move in from elsewhere? Not so lucky.
/r/MensRights31/03/14 11:33 AM
6

For all I care the tradcons here should just fuck off and stop pretending to care about men or their rights. It's just comitragic to watch them.
/r/MensRights22/09/13 07:14 PM
3

Yeah, yeah, a man should always first and foremost consider what women find attractive and not, you know, what he himself wants. We got that already. Ironically, though, such a man is not what most people would consider attractive by a long shot. Maybe because it seems really insecure?
/r/MensRights08/09/13 04:44 PM
4

Because being attractive to as many women as possible is apparently all that matters. Wow, your life must be pretty sad.
/r/MensRights08/09/13 07:39 AM
5

You don't have to be a girl, you can be the boy who does X, Y, and Z because you WANT to. 1) Does not necessarily practically work out that way. 2) Gender dysphoria (or most cases thereof) isn't about wanting to do X, Y and Z. It's about discomfort with ones own body.
/r/MensRights06/09/13 08:27 PM
2

Why work when you don't have to. The baffling thing is that so many anglosaxon men are willing to pay for the frankly rather parasitic lifestyle of these women.
/r/MensRights05/09/13 08:21 PM
5

The UN is a joke. They're too stuck up on being politically correct to actually do anything about human rights nowadays.
/r/MensRights05/09/13 11:33 AM
2

The Center for Disease Control’s 2010 National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey. Ironically they didn't define rape objectively either, yet their study shows that men and women are raped at about equal rates if they had defined it objectively. A lot better and more educated writers than me have written upon the subject. For example: http://permutationofninjas.org/post/57003274589/gender-symmetry-in-sexual-assault-an-analysis-of-the http://www.genderratic.com/p/836/manufacturing-female…
/r/MensRights05/09/13 11:28 AM
2

Except that men are raped at roughly equal rates to women when we define rape objectively instead of something that can only happen to women.
/r/MensRights03/09/13 06:23 AM
0

A couple gets married right out of college. One partner gets a good upper-middle class job, and they decide early on that one partner will earn the income and the other will tend to the home and children. After 30 years of marriage, the income-earning partner decides that he/she is no longer happy and wants a divorce. The income-earning spouse still has the (potentially) highest-paying 10-15 years of his/her life ahead of him/her. The other partner has never even held a real job. Deciding to sta…
/r/MensRights03/09/13 06:20 AM
2

Practically nobody gets alimony in the nordic countries and we're doing fine. So yeah... alimony is complete and utter bullshit. Stop living in the victorian era.
/r/MensRights03/09/13 06:16 AM
20

Nope. It would be fair to also teach men how to protect themselves from sexual abuse. Which is not to say that protecting oneself from emotional and financial abuse is not important, but that sexual abuse also happens to men and that needs to be acknowledged.
/r/MensRights01/09/13 07:10 AM
1

I would not respond. They're much more likely to start spouting bullshit than to actually listen to you and reconsider so why bother?
/r/MensRights25/08/13 01:20 PM
6

Good for them if that's how they want it. What does this have to do with mensrights?
/r/MensRights25/08/13 12:41 PM
0

But it then shouldn't make a difference if their body matches or not if their identity is solely in their head? Unless of course, identity is not solely restricted to what is in a person's head but is also a part of their physical self. Identity is by definition something that exists solely within a persons head (it means a persons image of themselves). Of course identity may lead into conflict with external factors for various reasons, but that's a matter separate from identity itself. If you'r…
/r/MensRights18/07/13 03:40 PM
0

If that is the case then why have the surgery? Dissatisfaction with the body part due to it not matching with the identity they already have would be the most common reason. You should know that much. Solely? no. but it is a significant part. One that cannot simply be ignored. Really? How so? Because I would tend to think that who a person is is moreso a collection of their mental characteristics. Appearances are irrelevant to that. They do change how other people perceive you, but that's quite …
/r/MensRights18/07/13 03:09 PM
-1

Our sexuality is a huge part of our identities Perhaps, perhaps not. But you forget that the surgery never changed that person's identity. They went through it because they already identified that way. Sexual identity is in a person's head, not between their legs. Even people who have had extreme cosmetic surgery have a responsibility to reveal that to an intimate partner as it is a fundamental alteration of who they are. It's a change to their appearance. Do you think that appearances define wh…
/r/MensRights18/07/13 02:40 PM
1

Whether or not I can have children is not a part of who I am. The same as if I had a kidney transplant or an appendectomy. A person having had a gender reassignment surgery, is. I'm not sure where you got the idea that a gender reassignment surgery somehow changes who a person is. It's basically just a plastic surgery. Does you having whatever you have between your legs drastically change who you are? I'd think not. They have a right to informed consent and can decide if such a surgery is a deal…
/r/MensRights18/07/13 01:45 PM
1

You could say that about most anything. For example the vasectomy you just said it was ok not to tell about. Sounds to me like you're making rather arbitary distinctions about what people should be open about and what they can keep to themselves.
/r/MensRights18/07/13 01:16 PM
2

On the other, there is the reality that such a procedure does have a direct impact on the other party. Like what?
/r/MensRights18/07/13 10:27 AM
69

It's not exactly propaganda if it's 100% truthful portrayal of the events though.
/r/MensRights16/07/13 09:29 AM
4

But I don't understand. Wasn't feminism supposed to be about equality and helping men too? /s Which is to say: I'm not surprised by this in the least.
/r/MensRights16/07/13 09:21 AM
0

1) If you're going to try and insult me, at least do your research. A quick look at my post history would reveal that I'm not a feminist. 2) Read my post again. Because, clearly, you have no idea what I said there. Protips: 2a) I did not call you a bigot. In fact I said nothing at all in regards to your views about transpeople (frankly, I don't care). I just addressed the utter lack of logical thought put into your post. In case you really need me to break it down for you: Someone calling you a …
/r/MensRights08/07/13 07:12 PM
0

Your insistence on me referring to trans-women as "real" women is a fundamental attack on my perception of the world. You represent the very worst sort of bigot in that you seek to police my thoughts by controlling my voice. Nobody insisted on you doing anything. Certainly nobody forced you to do anything. They just called you a bigot. Now how is that a "fundamental attack" on your perception of the world? Unless you're trying to insist that they should not consider you a bigot? Because that, by…
/r/MensRights08/07/13 06:36 PM
9

Looks like just another gynocentrist to me. She may criticize feminism, but that does not make her an ally to MRM.
/r/MensRights07/07/13 08:39 AM
2

What do men get in return for this immense sacrifice? You're basically saying that it is OK to expect men to suffer from the benefit of women but not expect women to compensate them for it. There is no compensation that would make it worthwile to begin with.
/r/MensRights01/07/13 07:27 AM
27

That was AskMen? Why do I just feel like I delved into SRS?
/r/MensRights20/06/13 04:28 AM
7

I see this idea as ignorant. To think that men and women are just random in their behaviors is simply absurd. It is not stating that men and women are random in their behaviours, it is stating that there is great individual variance within those groups which makes them overlap. Do you seriously deny this? To apply different solutions to men and women only ever looking at gender would be seriously inflexible, and would leave a lot of people from both genders without the help they need.
/r/MensRights15/06/13 04:01 PM
3

When did it ever pay off to be a white knight? Seems to me an early grave is all they have ever got, and will ever get.
/r/MensRights15/06/13 02:39 PM
13

And interestingly enough it's the christian conservatives (KrF), Norwegian Defence Research Establishment (FFI) and Norwegian Association for Women's Rights (NKF) that is against this ... And even more interesting is it that the feminist is the one with the most gender essentialist view Nothing new there.
/r/MensRights14/06/13 01:42 PM
2

You have a whopping 1 downvote?
/r/MensRights13/06/13 10:35 AM
4

Giving so much power to these women with their feathers while denying that the people at the top (men, to be clear) pulled the strings when it came to war, media (and therefore common perspective), and the idealized form and actions of each gender. Yes, of course the poor wimminz never had any ability to make any choices for themselves. Unlike the men in the war, they were not threathened with a gun to do what they did, you know. It was voluntary. You pawns of feminism just never know when to qu…
/r/MensRights12/06/13 07:29 PM
0

1) Don't move into the US. (Why would anyone want to live there?) 2) Don't get married. That's pretty much it.
/r/MensRights11/06/13 09:45 AM
2

Good old 'murica. The disgrace in the name of western countries.
/r/MensRights11/06/13 07:37 AM
8

Wrong. We cannot leave Facebook without putting up a fight. Leaving Facebook and deleting your accounts en masse will hurt them much more than anything else you can do.
/r/MensRights04/06/13 01:58 PM
10

None of that differs from most other western states, certainly not from USA. All I'm saying is that in many areas Sweden is far ahead of the other western countries in men's rights, not that they are perfect, or even all that good. Just the best of all bad options.
/r/MensRights01/06/13 07:55 AM
2

They have practically ended conscription already. It's Sweden's neighbours (Finland and Norway) that continue drafting men, but not women.
/r/MensRights01/06/13 07:50 AM
11

And why is that? Regardless of the feminism in there (which happens to exist in every western country), Sweden is pretty much an MRA heaven compared to the rest of the world. For example: No draft. No alimony. Very small homeless population thanks to social services. Circumcision is very rare. Paternal leave is allowed and encouraged for men. Now compare that to the US. It's ironic that the (mostly American) population of this sub has seemingly taken a liking for bashing Sweden regardless of the…
/r/MensRights01/06/13 07:29 AM
0

Actually, it's conservatism (which, I believe, is what you represent?) that maintains female supremacy along with feminism, not egalitarianism. Nice try, though.
/r/MensRights30/05/13 02:46 PM
13

Do you realize the difference between disagreeing with someone and spouting bullshit? Usually arguments revolve around facts and logic, yours have neither.
/r/MensRights30/05/13 11:32 AM
16

About what, exactly? That FGM is worse than MGM? Blatantly false. Not only do both have varying degrees, but the foreskin actually contains more nerve endings than the clitoris which he compares it to, which would actually imply that removing foreskin is worse by the only measurable standard there is (loss of nerve endings). That there are "moral" reasons for MGM but not for FGM? Also blatantly false. Both practices revolve around a varying amount of reasons, which are mostly the same for both, …
/r/MensRights30/05/13 11:31 AM
13

I think that's enough ignorance from you. Don't talk about a subject of which you know nothing about, please.
/r/MensRights30/05/13 10:45 AM
3

It's Sweden we're talking about. Considering that Sweden is a much more equal place for men to live in than the anglo countries have ever been, I really don't see what exactly "we're talking about".
/r/MensRights14/05/13 02:14 PM
6

It's not embarrasing to watch, it's quite hillarious. They are chipping away their own support by making themselves look like utter retards while all their opponents need to do is to publish their behaviour.
/r/MensRights13/05/13 08:59 AM
1

A bookcase sociopath right there.
/r/MensRights27/04/13 08:58 AM
21

I really don't understand the from time to time occuring Sweden hate on this place, when in Sweden men are in much more equal position than in most other western countries. Certainly more so than in the US. You know, alimony? Doesn't exist in Sweden. The draft was done with a couple of years ago. And although circumcision is still allowed by the law, it's virtually non-existent and practiced only by religious minorities. Just as a few examples. As for that text: since when has feminists calling …
/r/MensRights19/04/13 10:56 AM
2

Can you feminists actually read the FAQ instead of making these useless threads every 2 seconds? It's not that hard.
/r/MensRights30/03/13 11:59 AM
8

You could also look up Murray A. Straus, who has done a lot of research on intimate partner violence and found it time and time again to be about equal between men and women. http://pubpages.unh.edu/~mas2/ID-Sample-4-04.htm
/r/MensRights22/03/13 12:36 PM
5

Rape culture doesn't exist cause it show that we as humans accept rape through normal cultures which is bullshit. Tbh, most people do accept the rape of men. So some kind of rape culture does exist - it's just not what feminists would have us believe.
/r/MensRights22/03/13 08:33 AM
13

And whether you care to accept it or not, women are the predominant victims of spousal abuse. Sorry to break it to you, but scientific research says otherwise.
/r/MensRights22/03/13 08:08 AM
3

The problem, then, is how do we force women into the role as well? How do you force men?
/r/MensRights21/03/13 05:49 AM
25

But always remember that feminists acknowledge and care about men's issues as well! /s
/r/MensRights19/03/13 04:49 PM
22

No, MRA's should be doing exactly the opposite. There is no "fundamental core of what it is to be a man" and the only thing such ridiculous notions have ever done is to keep men down and disposable.
/r/MensRights16/03/13 07:20 PM
13

It's a stinking pile of bullshit. Always was.
/r/MensRights16/03/13 06:58 PM
6

This is what the real rape culture looks like.
/r/MensRights15/03/13 09:04 PM
3

Would have already included one if I remembered where I found it. As far as I recall in the study they gave women testosterone and made them play a game where they had to split up money. The ones who got testosterone offered to split the money more evenly than the ones who did not. The funny thing is that the ones who did not get testosterone, but believed they did, were the ones to make the most unfair offers.
/r/MensRights12/03/13 02:48 PM
20

There was a study a few years ago where they found testosterone doing exactly the opposite. That is, increasing co-operative behaviour.
/r/MensRights12/03/13 06:59 AM
22

Talk about rape culture.
/r/MensRights02/03/13 06:40 AM
2

While there are women who have issues with sharing bathrooms with trans women, they are not generally people strongly associated with the feminist movement. Sorry if this bursts your bubble, but there are plenty of feminists like that.
/r/MensRights28/02/13 09:24 AM
8

Haha, oh wow. Why aren't we working together you ask? You'd do better to ask that from your fellow feminists. We could've worked together, you see. It just seems that your fellow feminists were too interested in advancing their own position in society through denying, minimizing and reframing male issues and just generally playing Machiavellian power games and fuck everyone else. And these aren't even the radicals I'm talking about. It's quite obvious that MRM has nothing to gain from such "co-o…
/r/MensRights18/02/13 10:38 PM
19

Well if this isn't an amusing piece of irony. A feminst claiming that MRAs don't understand feminism while utterly failing to understand anything about the MRM.
/r/MensRights12/02/13 01:29 PM
5

slaves are violently punished or killed when they refuse to work Do you know what they do to people who try to avoid conscription during wartime? They execute them. But that's totally not the same as being violently killed when refusing to work right? /s
/r/MensRights26/01/13 10:11 AM
16

Your using a term that was created by feminists to describe men. Except it wasn't created by feminists and it's used to describe both men and women. The term simply means that your gender identity and body match each other. Nothing offensive about that.
/r/MensRights21/01/13 05:47 AM
3

Sex selective conscription is by far the biggest oppression against men throughout all of history. It treats men like cattle whose lives and well being have no value. Sending them to die and to witness all the horrors of war while women are allowed to remain safe at home. It is the single most sexist practice in the history of humankind and should never even be considered by any nation willing to call itself equal. Having said that, the draft itself, even if not sex selective, is slavery and thu…
/r/MensRights20/01/13 08:06 AM
0

There is a difference, though. In that video there are no threats of violence made against other people. Only depictions of violence. The other video, however, is quite clearly a threat of violence against the people named.
/r/MensRights18/01/13 09:47 PM
3

Doesn't this video pretty much count as an illegal threat (I know in here it would)? Reporting it to the police seems like the way to go, especially since the makers went through all the trouble to name themselves like idiots.
/r/MensRights18/01/13 09:33 PM
2

Yes, says the person who actually has some knowledge in these things. Shocking, I know.
/r/MensRights18/01/13 03:08 PM
7

Well, aren't you ignorant. Just for clarification: Trans people are not mentally ill in any way and in fact not having any mental illnesses is usually a strict requirement for getting treatment.
/r/MensRights18/01/13 03:03 PM
6

Men's rights and traditionalism are hardly compatible so you might want to clarify which side's arguments you are actually looking for.
/r/MensRights13/01/13 07:08 PM
2

So your daughters get a choice whereas your sons do not, and are told to revere "ladies". Does not seem very equal to me. What if your sons don't want to have anything to do with the typical male gender role?
/r/MensRights11/01/13 09:17 AM
1

"True, I've never really understood bigots."
/r/MensRights11/01/13 05:14 AM
14

It's a satire.
/r/MensRights09/01/13 05:10 PM
2

Well, this particular person's (the person being talked about) life certainly isn't worth anything.
/r/MensRights03/01/13 05:26 PM
15

We'll talk about feminism changing when it actually starts to produce different results. Results matter more than empty words, after all.
/r/MensRights03/01/13 11:04 AM
9

Even if that were true it doesn't really matter. The truth remains that feminism as a movement uses it's political power to harm paternal rights and oppose shared custody rather than support them, whether certain feminists agree or not.
/r/MensRights03/01/13 10:47 AM
3

And funnels money to people who kill people and commit arson. He should use every resource available. Since the authorities aren't willing to do anything justice must be sought elsewhere. If that means taking some questionable measures then so be it.
/r/MensRights03/01/13 10:30 AM
11

I feel that people who claim to be feminists yet mock paternal rights aren't feminists at all That particular no true scotsman won't get you anywhere here.
/r/MensRights03/01/13 10:11 AM
38

Disgusting. This should be showed to every person who comes here to claim that feminism and MRM are the same and should work together.
/r/MensRights21/12/12 09:01 AM
1

Again a few more reasons why I'd want to live in Denmark.
/r/MensRights19/12/12 11:15 AM
5

I have to wonder why one would enjoy or engage in hookups at all if they involve such trouble with one having to deal with people one can't even trust in the slightest.
/r/MensRights19/12/12 08:56 AM
7

Not sure how is the writer of the letter "getting it". Among other things (s)he seems to subtly attempt to push gender roles on men (be masculine) and mourn the loss of traditional gender roles. I may be wrong in my interpretation, but if I'm right the writer of this letter is not getting it at all and is instead yet another conservative trying to dictate the lives of men and women alike.
/r/MensRights19/12/12 08:45 AM
14

In my county there is mandatory military service for men, but not women. That was the biggest inequality that really pissed me off (and it still does). As I grew up I gradually found more and more inequalities towards men.
/r/MensRights18/12/12 12:07 PM
3

Good riddance. I could never stand the little hypocrite.
/r/MensRights13/12/12 08:04 PM
1

Almost cute.
/r/MensRights13/12/12 07:45 PM
-3

So why did you go there in the first place?
/r/MensRights04/11/12 06:14 PM
1

No, really, it's quite easy. You should try it sometime.
/r/MensRights30/10/12 08:19 PM
1

You're talking as if women are somehow special or a big deal. Here's a newsflash for you: They are not. Maybe the reason that so many men go crazy over women in the gaming world is that they haven't realized that?
/r/MensRights30/10/12 03:23 PM
6

It's just a silly insult/shaming tactic that belongs to the children's playground. Not worth any consideration, let alone response.
/r/MensRights30/10/12 10:19 AM
11

Even if they did do this, the simple solution is if all guy's just ignored them, no shame=white feather fails Yes, but to do that there must first be awareness that there is nothing shameful for a man wanting to stay safe. The cultural brainwashing for a man to provide and protect can be quite strong, and it definitely was during those eras.
/r/MensRights30/10/12 10:09 AM
31

Why would any male still live there? That's outrageous and only serves to allow female perpetrators of violence to further victimize their victims.
/r/MensRights30/10/12 09:56 AM
27

So, only recently having paid much attention to radical feminism, I'm surprised by this. Why do they dislike transpeople? I don't understand it. They think that transwomen are really men who are out there to trick and rape them. Deluded people being deluded.
/r/MensRights29/10/12 01:54 PM
33

There are a lot more things stigmatized about male sexuality than just saying no, though. Take men who like pegging, for instance. Or pretty much anything out of the standard "man perform - woman receive" dichotomy. I find it a small wonder that men are able to enjoy sex at all with the cultural standards we have about it.
/r/MensRights29/10/12 01:45 PM
4

Children and pussies as far as the eye can see. Please start by removing yourself and we'd have one less. Seriously, it's you who is acting like a 10 year old here.
/r/MensRights26/10/12 04:30 AM
18

There are also MTF MRAs you know...
/r/MensRights24/10/12 02:57 PM
2

You are an immature little pup of no consequence whatsoever, a coward, a nothing. Oh the irony.
/r/MensRights21/10/12 08:00 AM
5

PUA is by it's very nature about the most gynonormative thing ever. If anything it's ideology is more opposed to the MRM than related to it.
/r/MensRights20/10/12 06:08 PM
2

And I've already clarified that i wasn't referring I circumcision as a parenting or lifestyle choice Actually you basically just said "I haven't said this thing that I just said", which I then pointed out. But whatever, I see there is no point to this.
/r/MensRights16/10/12 06:38 PM
2

Ok, you seem intent on finding meaning where there isn't any. I DO NOT want to circumcise my son and I am of the opinion that circumcision is wrong. No, you seem to be intent on finding some meaning where there isn't any. You've made it quite clear that you don't want to circumcise your son, and I think this is good. If you had sufficient reading comprehension you'd notice that I wasn't addressing your decision at all, but your definition of circumcision as "a parenting and lifestyle choice". Wh…
/r/MensRights16/10/12 06:24 PM
6

I wasn't referring to circumcision as lifestyle choice. Ahem. I would not condemn someone for heir personal choice to circumcise their child no more than I would condemn them for other parenting or lifestyle choices I disagree with.
/r/MensRights16/10/12 05:55 PM
8

Since when was violence against another person a "parenting or lifestyle choice"?
/r/MensRights16/10/12 05:32 PM
12

Circumcision removes the most sensitive parts of the penis, causes severe pain, exposes the glans which is supposed to be an internal organ, and in addition can cause some pretty severe complications like infections, mental illnesses or even death. Why you would even consider inflicting such serious violence on your baby is beyond me. Here such a thing would probably go into police investigation as severe assault.
/r/MensRights16/10/12 04:47 PM
0

If they try anything just dox them back until they're crying and sniveling. They reap what they sow.
/r/MensRights11/10/12 06:59 PM
2

Being a real man means standing up against women's bullshit. Like the bullshit you're spouting out right now?
/r/MensRights04/10/12 07:23 PM
4

What a pathetic reactionary backlash.
/r/MensRights17/09/12 07:45 AM
5

Let's put the kid in a dress so he can become feminized, thus rejecting his masculinity. Good Thinking. Yeah, instead let's have the kid forced into your narrow ideas of masculinity, refusing his individuality. Great thinking!
/r/MensRights01/09/12 08:20 PM
3

The fact that our culture accepts routinely breaking the bodily autonomy of men is not a men's rights issue? What?
/r/MensRights31/08/12 01:58 PM
3

Not sure if you are really that stupid or just trolling.
/r/MensRights27/08/12 06:26 PM
10

Because there is no comparison between male and female circumcision. By all means, keep being ignorant while talking as if you know something about the subject.
/r/MensRights27/08/12 06:16 PM
7

I don't believe these "human rights" that you talk about trump parental rights. Then get the fuck out of here. Go ahead and move to some 3rd world country with no human rights. You might also learn what a real lack of religious freedom looks like over there. but circumcision is hardly abuse anymore then piercing ears is abuse. Let's see... In circumcision you lose 10,000 to 20,000 highly sensitive nerve endings. In ear piercing you lose no nerve endings. In circumcision you expose the glans of p…
/r/MensRights27/08/12 06:10 PM
4

Not my newborn baby's body. Does the basic human right to bodily autonomy really mean that little to you? And you're comparing us to nazis?
/r/MensRights27/08/12 05:57 PM
5

Your religious rights end where someone else's body begins.
/r/MensRights27/08/12 05:50 PM
8

Oh the irony.
/r/MensRights26/08/12 05:29 PM
4

Your brother will most likely live a lot longer than his cowrokers. Joke's on them when they find out they're not invincible.
/r/MensRights26/08/12 05:26 PM
7

You could also point out that implying that one group of human beings is more important than another is rather questionable from a human rights standpoint.
/r/MensRights26/08/12 05:08 PM
2

I've always thought that this didn't make any sense. Why would men stifle something that did nothing but benefit them? One argument that I tend to encounter a lot when studying history would be that since the beginning of agriculture and inherited land men wanted to control women's sexuality so they could be certain that their children (who would inherit their land) were really theirs.
/r/MensRights26/08/12 02:18 PM
1

So much for universal human rights, eh.
/r/MensRights26/08/12 06:41 AM
2

which the only things they consider men's issues are the rights of men to like feminine things Feminists have done nothing positive for feminine men. Instead they invented creep shaming and other tools to shame men who aren't fulfilling their assigned gender role. So obviously they don't consider that an issue either.
/r/MensRights26/08/12 06:31 AM
1

Sigh. So what? Because some people here don't agree with egalitarian MRAs they need their own subreddit? That is one horribad argument.
/r/MensRights24/08/12 05:57 PM
4

Nevermind. It seems this is just an echo-chamber. Eh? How did you come into that conclusion?
/r/MensRights24/08/12 05:40 PM
-1

That doesn't explain why they need their own subreddit at all. It seems like you're incapable of answering the question.
/r/MensRights24/08/12 05:18 PM
3

You didn't answer my question. Egalitarians are just fine with /r/MensRights so what do they need another subreddit for?
/r/MensRights24/08/12 02:08 PM
0

So create /r/CMRA, or just go to /r/Conservatism if conservatives aren't satisfied with this one. The egalitarians seem just fine with this subreddit, so what do they need another one for?
/r/MensRights24/08/12 01:14 PM
1

Since when did we need 2 subreddits?
/r/MensRights24/08/12 01:08 PM
14

edited to say that yes, i think children are their parents property until they are 18. So you're advocating for slavery and essentially rolling human and children's rights back 200-300 years? Nice. Go troll someplace else.
/r/MensRights24/08/12 07:01 AM
8

First take a look at how much feminists actually rally against the causes of MRM (men's parental and reproductive rights, male genital mutilation, gender-selective military draft etc.). After you've done that ask the question from yourself.
/r/MensRights24/08/12 05:05 AM
4

"Evil" is a silly word. I can't stand feminism because of it's heavy gynocentric bias.
/r/MensRights23/08/12 04:25 AM
21

At least people over there aren't buying it at all.
/r/MensRights22/08/12 07:32 PM
5

Go back as far as you like. I beg you to find any instance where women were able to do, have, dress, study, eat, etc., as they wanted just as men always have without thinking about it. What?
/r/MensRights22/08/12 03:54 PM
10

It's always nice to see progress.
/r/MensRights22/08/12 01:52 PM
4

I think (s)he is saying that feminism has very patriarchal attitudes about men.
/r/MensRights16/08/12 02:04 PM
21

Finland still has conscription it, and all the media ever seems to talk about it is how "women are harmed by it". Never mind the enslavement of men. :/
/r/MensRights16/08/12 02:01 PM
2

Society does not treat women as disposable as it treats men. A problem that you apparently support. Doesn't that make YOU the advocate for female superiority here? The truth is society can't treat woman as disposable as it treats men Quite the claim society can't treat men and women as equals. It's an enormous claim and yet you have absolutely no proof of it.
/r/MensRights15/08/12 02:54 PM
6

What the fuck does this have to do with female superiority?
/r/MensRights15/08/12 02:22 PM
0

Not sure what to think about this. I don't like it that there are some rather loud yelling traditionalists trying to pass themselves under the label of MRA (which is pretty self-contradictory when you look at it), but switching labels would imply that the MRM, in general, is not egalitarian and that's not really true.
/r/MensRights15/08/12 10:39 AM
3

Except that traditionalism pretty much entails forcing men in "their place" as a group to be abused for resources, as subhumans without any rights or value. How is that not incompatible with men's rights activism?
/r/MensRights14/08/12 08:14 PM
21

Transsexual is not a sexual orientation. :/
/r/MensRights05/08/12 11:08 PM
3

1. How do you define feminism? Feminism is what people who call themselves feminists say and do. Most of them seem to be unified by the belief that women are somehow more oppressed than men. 2. What is your opinion on rape culture? I'd say there is something to it, but it's the other way around than what is usually thought. A man who rapes a woman is seen as a monster, but when a woman rapes a man people laugh and call the man lucky. 3. What is your solution to MR issues? Political lobbying, vis…
/r/MensRights03/08/12 09:45 PM
2

Yes, it's a gender role. Like I said elsewhere, where the notion of the patriarchy differs is in the belief that there can only be one truly ideal being. Traditional gender roles suggest that there are at least two. Traditional gender roles does not need to take a stance on what is considered truly ideal and what is not. It merely observes that men and women are pushed into gender roles and punished for not behaving in line with them. To start making assertions about which of these roles is cons…
/r/MensRights03/08/12 04:05 PM
0

No, they're men deviating from the masculine ideal They are not deviating from it nearly as much as women supposedly do. Yet women got and keep getting treated better. below women who are performing appropriately to their station Or acting in line with their assigned gender role. in much feminist discourse, there is nothing more inappropriate than for a man to move from the perceived, masculine ideal, and for women to try to come closer to it. Or there is nothing more inappropriate than a man de…
/r/MensRights03/08/12 01:14 PM
1

That's a perfect example of a feminine trait often ascribed to metrosexuality or homosexuality--deviant forms of masculinity by the model of a singular, overarching human ideal. Under the so-called patriarchal hierarchy, though, those men should be treated better than women because they're still men. That is not and has certainly never been the case. Instead women are treated by far better than men who are showing so-called feminine traits. Hell, one could even say that women are and have always…
/r/MensRights03/08/12 08:37 AM
1

Nice rationalization for allowing baby boys being mutilated. As if most people in the western world were fanatical enough about circumcision to go out of their way to perform it on their children it and risk jail time for it.
/r/MensRights29/06/12 07:57 AM
5

So... Ozy is being idiotic, hypocritical, narcissistic and cruel. What else is new?
/r/MensRights28/06/12 12:49 PM
1

And this is supposedly uplifting? Uh oh..
/r/MensRights27/04/12 05:23 AM
0

Nothing justifies sentencing a person to death so that another may live because they happened to be of the "wrong" gender. That's just disgusting.
/r/MensRights19/04/12 04:12 PM
-1

That it's not just her own idea does not exclude it from being simply speculation, which it is (unless you have some study which I haven't seen to cite here). It's not unusual for the evopsych fans to throw around these kinds of theories, but that doesn't make them any more verifiable. Everything being caused by evolutionary mechanisms? Surely you're not ignoring that culture and socialisation affect people too? Although if you include cultural evolution I guess what you say could be true. Howev…
/r/MensRights18/04/12 06:10 PM
2

That's a lot of speculation and wild guesses to throw around as if they were verifiable facts, though. Men may take more risks on average, but there is no way to test if this is because of some evolutionary mechanism. Also, although admittedly I'm no evolutionary biologist, I find the idea of one sex of the same species evolving something while the other does not a little odd. Sure, there are some innate differences on average due to hormones and sex chromosomes, but the idea of two sexes of the…
/r/MensRights18/04/12 02:43 PM
0

What place does a piece shaming effeminate men and trying to push men back into rigid gender roles have on a men's rights forum? I thought we were here to fight this kind of shit.
/r/MensRights12/04/12 12:25 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter