TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

BrahYouSerious Archive

View 2 posts and 394 comments by BrahYouSerious on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
6

Yah, for the most part men think respect is respect. What women call respect men call, 'not being a prick'.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/16 01:57 PM
0

I agree fully, but its hard to blame them, its all many have known.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/16 12:55 PM
1

Im red, and right wing as fuck, but there are legit reasons for this in MOST cases.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/16 12:35 PM
1

Unfortunately many laws are definitely not equal.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/16 12:21 PM
1

Pretend libertarian.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/16 12:05 PM
1

I cannot believe that you arent banned.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/16 11:49 AM
12

We have had this talk before. Men and women have different definitions for respect. For women, respect means common decency. For men, respect means deference. If you need further proof just read the replies and you will see that there are 2 clearly different answers. One is "Everyone should get basic respect" (this is common decency), and the other is "Respect is given when it has been earned (this is deference).
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/16 11:40 AM
2

OK reread what I wrote. People do this shit all the time, I do I do
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/16 11:36 AM
6

A man (or woman) does not "withhold" attention from their partner. youre wrong. People do this shit all the time, I do and I cannot be alone.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/16 01:05 PM
2

Treat all guns as loaded.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/16 01:29 AM
1

link us to something up to your standards.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/16 01:25 AM
2

So just cover the names.. I 100% dont believe you.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/16 07:39 PM
5

Post a screenshot
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/16 10:03 PM
1

The genders arent close to identical. Nature is in favour of men in some adpects and in favour of women in others. Depending on the topic at hand nature has given the rough end of the stick to one of the genders. Nature literally isnt treating men and women as equals in all circumstances.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/16 09:45 PM
1

ahhh... Look up the stats..?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/16 11:40 AM
1

Well I don't see peer reviewed reports and university degrees and research dedicated to it either. Tonnes of it isnt politically correct, very little research is peer reviewed in any sassertion which isnt politically correct.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/16 11:16 AM
0

sexism ˈsɛksɪz(ə)m/ noun prejudice, stereotyping, or discrimination, typically against women, on the basis of sex. nature is prejudiced. Men are better at some things, while women are better at others. Also lel at how the new definition for sexist is itself sexist.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/16 11:05 AM
0

Thats not up to me, thats up to her.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/16 12:13 AM
2

Access to the most successful men. The ideas support help and advice which comes with it. Its a friendly society after all. " I doubt it women as I can't see students flocking to some guys house just because he's in frat" I think you miss the entire point. The frat membership doesnt make him attractive, the social status of the in group does, the life changes he makes with the help advice and mentoring from the most successful guys does. Again, standard friendly society stuff.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/16 10:50 PM
2

Every time I mention this place to a guy who is sexually successful, good looking and reasonably stable they're like, 'what the actual fuck?!' Of course they are, what incentive do they have to reveal anything outside of mirroring socially safe opinions. Law 38: Think what you like, but behave like others. I have a close relationship with my auntie and we talked about RP stuff, she is very intelligent and hard left/feminist leaning. She says to me "but I know all of these well educated left lean…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/16 10:33 PM
0

ambitious amˈbɪʃəs/Submit adjective Having or showing a strong desire and determination to succeed. Thats the definition.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/16 10:31 PM
0

All of my this. Lol at women thinking that they should be men. Imagine the shit show if men suddenly tried to be best at creating and nurturing babies and the reaction we would have to that, but here we are with women doing the opposite.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/16 10:30 PM
1

They give the members better access to the things that they seek.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/16 10:27 PM
4

Eventually, I realized many atheists are very liberal and had replaced theism with the BP cult of collectivism Yep. 90% of the non religious have replaced the clergy with the govt. Literally have the religion of social democracy.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/16 10:20 PM
2

What?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/16 12:23 PM
1

No. The point is that its a politically charged topic. Like, If women were infact illogical do you think there would be a modern study to support it? No it wouldnt be credible, no one would give that a favourable peer review because its political suicide. This is teh same.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/16 12:23 PM
1

I dont buy it. That position is literally retarded when discussing politically charged opinions.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/16 11:17 AM
2

He is right, you are impossible to take seriously.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/16 10:57 AM
1

"Id prefer to agree with those whos position supports mine"
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/16 10:22 AM
1

Here I am as RP leaning poster, for the first time in weeks because im sick of how bad BP posters are with this. Its just the internet.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/16 10:20 AM
1

lolwut
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/16 10:35 AM
1

Lol what the hell are you talking about, are you serious? The world was built, fought for, died for and protected by men. Honestly, you have it because a dude agreed to give it to you.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/16 10:35 AM
3

Women only have and have only ever had that which men allow them to have. Harsh truth, but 100% true none the less.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/16 05:08 AM
3

Yep. Doesnt change the point in any way.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/16 05:05 AM
3

Come on, you know why.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/16 11:21 AM
3

No self respect, probably hangs with a similar crowd.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/16 10:56 AM
6

Tattoos. Not 3, pretending to be a proper businessman while on an iPad.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/16 05:37 AM
2

Youre unhappy in life. We all know this, youve said it both directly and between the lines plenty.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/16 02:59 AM
1

And yet we know how happy it makes you, because weve seen time and time again you open up about how unhappy you are here.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/16 12:56 AM
1

'Because we say it is so' Often phrased 'its x year!' Guys this is not a formal argument, youre literally just showing that you are mad others dont share your bias right now.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/16 01:18 AM
2

Lolol. I loce how some posts here cant be decifered whether they are trolls or for real.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/16 01:09 AM
1

It was fake
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/16 10:17 AM
1

Ive no idea the point you're making. Whiteknights are real. Old mate wasnt really mad he was just desperate for recognition.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/16 09:27 AM
0

Sorry.. Ive got bad news.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/16 09:16 AM
1

He was extreme because it was fake.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/16 09:05 AM
1

talked trash behing my back and how annoyed I was that this guy couldn't man up and complain to me in person, he got damn angry. Sounds fake.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/16 08:45 AM
1

Well that would be everyone.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/16 06:16 AM
1

Sounds like you aren't following your rule.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/16 12:39 AM
1

I really hope for sarcasm
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/16 11:52 AM
1

How many blowjobs have you given today?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/16 05:12 AM
1

Even then its just your personal judgement call.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/16 05:11 AM
3

And yet when women as a whole are treated differently...
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/16 05:05 AM
2

Yeah this comment too
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/16 05:01 AM
2

Absolutely. Fucking oath. The next comment too.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/16 05:01 AM
1

Otherwise, what is the point of ethics other than the feelz? Pet the kitty, kick the dog: it's all good if you feel good about it. Now you get it. While I dont want to kick any dog, your point is correct, there is no point to 'ethics' except that we are social animals, if you dont care for society there really is no need, its a dog eat dog world.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/16 12:25 AM
1

What is your pill? Red Do you have casual sex on a semi-frequent basis? In an LTR, right now, but in the past, hell yeah. Have you ever had a one night stand? No doubt. Have you ever been to a night club? Yeah Have you ever been drunk before? Im typing drunk. Have you ever smoked weed or a different illegal drug? Yesterday. What is the shortest amount of time between one you have met someone and when you first slept with them? 15 minutes. Do you lift weights at the gym? Yes. Male, 26yo, 30+
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/16 10:29 AM
1

You completely missed the point. On purpose I think.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/16 10:42 AM
2

Ok bro.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/16 04:30 AM
1

That's a brand new concept, only believed by a teeny tiny portion of humans alive. So if it were democracy, no.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/16 04:29 AM
1

Its not racism, the fact that you believe my statement of fact was racism based is my exact point. Your world view is based on the history which has been told to you, not the history which was taught to your brothers and sisters born in different continents.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/16 02:14 AM
1

Yes and the other reply my comment got was that it infact was rape either way. Between you pair my point has been made, proven and demonstrated perfectly, thankyou.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/16 02:13 AM
1

Your argument, which I believe is bunk, is my point, the lkeft have a weird definition of rape, a brand new one that has existed ever until the last few years.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/16 02:12 AM
1

There is FUCKLOADS of stuff left out of the history lkessons at your school. Do you think the japanese and the americans read the same history books? Tonnes of history has been altered or deleted. Know which race has been enslaved the most in history? Whites. African warlords and middle eastern warlords traded slaves for millenia, literally. But your history books dont mention that do they. And you think, no fucking way, I dont believe it right? Slave is based on the word slav. As in Slavic, as …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/16 11:07 PM
1

It really depends what definition of rape you are using, The perspective you have regarding the word. if your definition is "being grabbed and dominantly fucked without giving permission" Then most chicks would love to be raped. If the definition is "violently fucked completely against your will by a person you have no desire to sleep with while you fight for freedom" then of course none want that. Good job OP, pointing out the difference between actual rape and that which the left wants to call…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/16 11:04 PM
3

Like, child rapists I adore the mods. I love how they let this analogy slide but saying that someone hamstered is a big no no. FML.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/16 10:56 PM
1

Totally disagree. How much is a coke at disneyland? 12 bucks? Context matters, sure, but there is still a fair market value which can be given to anything, and knowledge of that value can be put to good use.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/16 07:46 AM
2

Zero input, potential output. Its good value.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/16 12:53 PM
1

Wait wait. You just said exactly what I said. Let me quote myself: "Its like 50/50 for women" Why would you even bother posting to tell me Im wrong if you are going to eventually post exactly what I wrote?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/16 12:51 PM
-1

Its not because women care more about the other things than men do. Thats undisputed.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/16 12:28 PM
1

Looks matter to women as much as it matters to men Thats out of touch.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/16 07:14 AM
1

Youre missing the point completely.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/16 07:11 AM
1

You're WAY WAY out of touch. Cant take your opinion seriously.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/16 03:32 AM
3

Its not that looks dont matter its just that they matter so little to women compared to how much looks matter to men. Its like 50/50 for women, and 70/30 for guys Men 50% looks 50% status, wealth, control over his life, surrounds, non neediness. Women 70% looks 10% manner 20% affection/loyalty.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/16 12:08 AM
2

The naivety required to believe this is off the chart.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/16 11:28 PM
3

Am I being trolled? Normal people bully, its a built in part of social animals. You cannot find a group of social animals without bullying. Tell me I am being trolled.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/16 09:55 AM
2

Normal people bully. I think that this is a pretty effective argument against your most recent point. Got all night, im waiting.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/16 09:49 AM
2

Talking about rejection brah, and the beginning of time, not 150 generations ago.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/16 09:36 AM
2

Sounds like it is an awfully effective tactic, no?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/16 09:35 AM
3

You dont believe in evolution?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/16 09:07 AM
2

Bullying kills people. Exactly. Pretty easy to prove how how bullying can be effective to achieve its goals, especially if youre going to sit there and make my points for me.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/16 09:06 AM
2

It's behavior that has been regulated from the beginning of time. Your opinion.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/16 09:04 AM
2

Because normal people don't get visibly, openly, verbally, even physically angry when they are rejected. Are you trolling?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/16 08:59 AM
1

You can't just sit here and justify bullying because of... Actually many would make legitimate arguments in favour of bullying.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/16 08:58 AM
3

Absolutely. We are animals, people who dont believe this are out of touch.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/16 08:57 AM
3

And falling for that urge more often than not results in bad results one way or the other, like it or not. I dont agree whatsoever.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/16 08:56 AM
3

Its like CG or plastic surgery, if you can see it it sucks, but 95% of it is invisible.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/16 08:32 AM
0

lol silly woman, youve no idea, no basis for what you are saying.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/16 10:44 AM
1

Those ideas are mainstream.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/16 03:27 AM
3

There's a good reason ideas like "single moms are delinquent sub human scum" aren't mainstream. The naivety required to believe this.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/16 11:32 PM
4

You've missed the point. The stuff that they say is true of everyone, male or female and they are drumming it in that women are just as shitty as every other human is.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/16 11:31 PM
2

Ill say it in a more pc way. Done.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/16 11:38 AM
1

I have never understood why it is "greed" to want to keep the money you have earned but not greed to want to take somebody else's money. Thomas Sowell
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/16 11:13 AM
1

Infact I do. Not religiously, couple times a week.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/16 11:12 AM
1

Lol at your selfish greed.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/16 10:27 AM
3

Thats me when Im single, based on the average guy I see out, the guys I know , the guys chasing the girls im sleeping with... Id say its 2-5% of guys in their 20s and 30s. I can hold a FWB relationship with 3-4 girls age ranging 20-35, looks, average to 8s. Never have I bothered attempting to date more than 4. Its rare to find a guy Im chatting to who can manage more than 2. Id say 5% can manage 2, 1-2% can manage 3 or more. This is an honest and serious response, AMA.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/16 05:45 AM
1

Id say the millions managing it who arent in the top 10% of earners proves the idea wrong. I believe that only entitlement could convince people otherwise.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/16 04:39 AM
-1

Wives and moms work because it's almost impossible to raise a family on a single income unless that single income is in the top 10% of wages in the country. An absolute joke and not even close to true.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/16 03:37 AM
1

Lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/16 02:49 AM
1

Still avoiding. Me and the upvoters believe what I'm saying.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/16 02:27 AM
2

Let me define 'right': A right is a promise to do violence on behalf of those who cannot or will not. Considering that 99% of people who bitch and moan about what should be or is a right dont even know what it means, why even listen to them?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/16 01:36 AM
3

No, slipperly slope CAN BE a fallacy. Slippery slopes exist and there is no way to know if a claim is a fallacy until we see the end of the scenario.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/16 01:34 AM
3

Get a male friend to volunteer to be slapped repeatedly in public by you and tell him to hit you once back after 30 seconds of you nonstop wailing on him and watch how privileged you are.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/16 01:30 AM
2

If we're gonna go by your logic, middle class white men are even more privileged Yeah, earning stuff makes you privileged, infact im pretty sure going and earning things is the definition of privilege. /s
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/16 01:29 AM
1

Not convincing anyone by avoiding my point. Meanwhile my top comment is being upvoted.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/16 01:00 AM
1

I don't believe that democracy allows people to make choices effectively, and I feel that the poor and uneducated are disproportionately affected by the voring system because they are most easily influenced and bought. You still havnt refuted this in any way.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/16 11:43 PM
1

Why dont you stop discrediting yourself, and stop avoiding refuting my point. Are people as a whole, especially the poor uneducated masses, actually able to make intelligent decisions regarding voting, or are they too easily influenced to see the forest for the trees? Just go ahead and stop avoiding that.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/16 11:14 PM
1

Of course it does. Feel free to back that up with ANYTHING more than conjecture. I didnt say it was limited to the poor, I said "at LEAST 20%". Maybe the bottom 50% maybe 90%.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/16 10:56 PM
1

The open market disagrees. Economics is the study of the use of scarce resources which have alternative uses. If being a paramedic was incredibly useful to society we would gladly pay more in order for there to be more paramedics, but we dont, because those resources are more useful overall paying you to do whatever it is you do for society.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/16 10:55 PM
0

This is almost always true.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/16 09:10 AM
2

Obviously it is. My comment has a bunch if upvotes. And ill also add that you havent addressed what I said at all, you're arguing things that I never mentioned. The question is simple, does the system in place actually help the poor by allowing them to vote or not? Are the poor as a group too easily influenced by media to make decisions which genuinely benefit them.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/16 05:52 AM
2

People take the best value workers. The only place people get picked by lowest price is instances where the only.people applying are worth less than minimum wage, or the job itself.is worth less.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/16 04:24 AM
2

You don't even understand what the point is, or what to discuss to make tour own points.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/16 03:50 AM
2

Why don't you answer the point being made and convince us all otherwise.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/16 03:47 AM
2

They're less productive because they're paid less This is completely false. This woukd take such a long time. You need to get educated before you start these debates
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/16 03:46 AM
2

Wrong. People are able to live on their wages, otherwise they would be dead. In china the average worker is FAR less productive than america, therefor the real wealth is very low overall.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/16 03:15 AM
2

Why doesn't everyone decide to pay half price at the store?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/16 03:11 AM
2

See your understanding.of economics is very typical of a person who has only been a low paid employee. There's a lot for you to learn. They can't all just pay minimum wage because people wont work for them. A wage is a sale. The employer is buying the employees labour. Its a transaction and all of the laws of transactions apply, such as supply and demand. Here's a thought experiment, go to the store and try to buy something for half of the displayed price. You will be refused because the store k…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/16 03:04 AM
2

No
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/16 02:50 AM
2

No. Lack of production does. Again, economics.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/16 02:46 AM
2

No. Read some thomas sowell, or just watch some short vids on youtube. He's a black dude who grew up in new york 50 years ago if you're worried about bias.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/16 02:42 AM
2

Unions and swift crime punishment broke the black family?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/16 02:38 AM
2

You might be surprised to find that the black family unit was doing great before the govt got involved and allowed the mothers gibme's.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/16 02:36 AM
2

This isn't increasing any wealth. For a hard left winger it amazes me that you want to take opportunities from actual oppressed minorities.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/16 02:23 AM
2

Once again, a post that completely fails to address the point made by the previous poster. For fuck sakes, wtf?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/16 02:14 AM
2

You dont get it at all. Youre asking to pay people more, and at the exact same time charge them more for goods. Think about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/16 01:20 AM
2

See my other reply to you, its true here too.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/16 01:09 AM
2

Honestly, you're just plain naive and I dont think it would be possible to explain why you are wrong to you.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/16 01:09 AM
2

Your understanding of business and economics is far below that needed in order to even debate you on these topics. Your ideas here have no merit.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/16 01:02 AM
2

If you pay your entire life you deserve social security in return. Unless you get to retirement as a net beneficiary.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/16 01:00 AM
2

How would that fix anything?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/16 01:00 AM
1

we know full well that weapons restrictions increase the overall crime rate. That much is black and white. You can be mad about it all you want but you wont be debating my ideas, youll be debating hard facts.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/16 12:54 AM
6

Im told I have to respond to you in the most PC way possible, so Ill lay it down in a pc fashion. You favour the govt forcing men to take responsibilities which the govt does not force women to take. Your ideas REPEATEDLY tell everyone on this board that you are ok with completely selfish policy, at the absolute expense of every group which isnt yours, dirt poor and female. People act as though they despise you because because you repeatedly openly talk about using big govt as a whole to take fr…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/16 12:46 AM
2

You;re right, lets delete the legal system. That'll fix things.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/16 12:41 AM
1

How is it possible to say that her opinion must be dismissed because she is openly and happily and intentionally a net beneficiary without that being an attack on her character? Its the literal truth, its completely fair to dismiss her views in this discussion for this reason, so are you telling me that if a persons worldview makes them scum, and that is the exact reason why you their points are illegitimate you're literally just not allowed to say it? Discussion ends with "I am entitled and I s…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/16 12:37 AM
2

Which merit. Ive got all week to be convinced of one which is better than economic contribution.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/16 12:34 AM
4

Everyone pays into the system. Right, stop doing this, Im pretty sure I called you out for this in my thread. Youve moved the goalposts. Here is what was said: net contributor. Either address what was actually said for fuck off.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/16 12:32 AM
2

Its not possible to criticise someone character without it being a personal attack. What about the hordes of "all redpillers are retards" calls by BP posters every single day?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/16 12:30 AM
6

The real question here is, are the poor even able to make voting decisions which will benefit themselves overall? It always occurs to me that the lowest 20% of people (at least) are completely incapable of seeing through the BS that they are fed from every type of media, and therefor they dont vote based on any logic regarding their own personal interests, emotion only. They seem incapable of making a decision which benefits them with all of the emotion driven political media they are fed. Id be…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/16 12:25 AM
1

Works for murder. Speeding, lots of shit. We dont know what it will work with if we dont try it.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/16 12:01 AM
1

What about everyone else who upvoted, they all though it was appropriate. I could have made my point in a PC way but the message would have been the same none the less.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/16 12:00 AM
6

I take issue with the current government lol which govt did you like hahaha
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/16 02:52 PM
2

Well they will be more responsible than they are now if we actually make them take responsibilty.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/16 02:05 PM
2

Feel free to prove it
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/16 01:40 PM
3

You'd rather the children not get their needs met just to teach the mother a lesson. It's very impractical. Well the REAL question is, if the mothers are afraid of being taught a lesson, will there be less kids overall without their needs met. We dont know until we try it.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/16 01:13 PM
3

By heaps if abortion isn't an option, by less if it is. But yeah. Not my problem I'm free and have enough money for good security
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/16 11:49 AM
1

You are completely provably wrong, women are overall much safer than men. Dispite these FACTS you sit here and are amazed that I dont believe the opposite, proving the exact point made in the OP.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/16 11:10 PM
1

OP here, this phenomenon is EXACTLY what the thread is about. The question is why?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/16 11:05 PM
1

I know a bunch of women and for them this stuff isnt regular. And when it has happened they were pissed off but none of them were mentally scarred for life and felt the need to join a left leaning movement and hate men forever. "This dude brushed his hand on my arse on purpose I think, fucking wierdo" And thats as far as the conversation goes.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/16 11:03 PM
1

Maybe she will find out that she wasnt actually raped.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/16 11:02 PM
3

Address the OP questions with an actual answer to the question posed, not just some "all women are victims BS" or fuck off. If youd read the OP its actually talking about how its very proven that women are safer than men. So address its point or fuck off.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/16 11:04 AM
1

Kind of. Its pretty much the same and just following the all time trend.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/16 11:03 AM
3

Im not engaging you, you arent ok upstairs. Ive seen you post before, its non stop complaining about victimhood, I dont need to hear it.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/16 10:59 AM
4

You, as an individual will remain your entire life feeling victimised, Ive seen your posts and you dont want to discuss anything, just moan about how lifes so unfair for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/16 10:35 AM
0

Just check some violent crime data over time, and note when restrictions were applied and lifted. You can google studies. or just look yourself. Australia for example, had a huge weapons restriction put in place in 96. http://www.aic.gov.au/dataTools/facts/vicViolentRate.html
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/16 10:19 AM
0

huh?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/16 09:18 AM
0

I'm not sure what you think those are, with regard to gun control With weapons restrictions come higher overall violent crime and homicide. Its a fact thats been proven time and again worldwide.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/16 08:48 AM
1

Ive honestly no idea what your point is
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/16 08:35 AM
3

You didnt reply and you downvoted me. You cannot be serious.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/16 08:16 AM
5

Men are at HIGHER risk. We live more of this risk. Are you an expert troll or what?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/16 05:18 AM
2

I'm at HIGHER risk! Are you serious? Did you read the thread?! I'm getting trolled hard.. right?!
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/16 05:13 AM
2

Again, you are talking about abnormal stuff, no harm at all, and no violence. Its soft compared to the male experience.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/16 02:47 AM
2

Aggravated doesnt mean main, its just means used actual violence instead of implied.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/16 11:50 PM
2

OP here, I am inclined to agree with him. Men deal with similar shit, lots of day to day intimidation from other men, we dont bitch and moan, for us its just part of life.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/16 11:41 PM
4

Boys in china was way more about surviving than family legacy. But yes thats a good example of where huge oppressive govts have forced a different decision.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/16 11:35 PM
2

I think we are geared as a species both ways, for men to be and act disposable and for society to treat them as such, and the opposite for women.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/16 11:04 PM
2

Best argument against my op post here. Thankyou.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/16 09:45 PM
3

Actually that's not true. Boys are at a much higher risk of being aborted, a higher risk of having life support turned off if they are born unhealthy etc
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/16 09:42 PM
9

Youve missed the OP point. Why is there an underlying theme of "the world is out to get me" coming from female culture and not male culture. Your answer does not answer this in any way.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/16 01:49 PM
7

You know the point being made, I know that you disagree with it because you dont ever have to look at the violence yourself and youve distanced yourself. Why even reply? Its a debate sub, not an argument sub and you clearly already have an air tight opinion formed.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/16 01:48 PM
5

And yet we dont get this from men. Why
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/16 01:44 PM
2

HUMANS OVERALL HAVE LITTLE RISK, SO WHY DO WOMEN CRY ABOUT IT ALL THE TIME.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/16 01:12 PM
1

So despite being safer you feel that women feel less safe because they wont be attacked by another woman? Why then arent men scared knowing that they wont be attacked by women, including small men, youths, and retirees?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/16 01:00 PM
3

Ok, men are at the receiving end of more murder, violent crimes, and equal in rape. Please tell me why it is true that women feel more at danger when they are infact safer.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/16 12:53 PM
3

You're intentionally narrowing the goalposts and placing them directly where you want them. In the big picture OP's premise is absolutely factual.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/16 12:41 PM
3

Its 50/50 in the states. Seeing as how you dont know that AND you are morally fine with killing the unborn, guess we wont get anywhere, so Ill move on.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/16 12:22 PM
5

Women are way more likely to be the victim of rape or sex-related homicide. Only if you ignore the huge groups of men which make up the majority of male victims. Only if you dont consider abortion murder. etc. 2 sides to that coin.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/16 12:08 PM
2

Why does what happen? More harsh punishments?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/16 11:49 AM
2

Why does what happen? More harsh punishments?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/16 11:49 AM
3

EVERYONE IS PUNISHED HARSHLY IN SOME SOCIETIES. And even in those societies the rules are set up primarily to protect women from danger.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/16 11:48 AM
6

Im not sure if you actually dont get it or I am being trolled. Their social rules use a hierarchical system which makes certain that women are protected from danger both sexually and physically, they go so far that they cover the womens bodies and faces so as not to attract sexual attention in public. Those women who go against this system are punished by it, in order to protect the system as a whole. You realize that incredible tortures are inflicted on men who go against the system in the east…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/16 11:43 AM
2

Never hear him talk about it or start a forum or movement about it?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/16 11:40 AM
3

They happily watch the women who go out of their way to go against the rules, which still even in those countries are about protecting the traditional family unit, and gender roles, including those which protect women sexually and physically.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/16 11:37 AM
4

So you put it down to strength alone, despite all real world experience anyone has, rather than nature coddling women?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/16 11:33 AM
3

Please clarify the point of your most recent post. The one I am now replying to. It sounds like you agree with the OP.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/16 11:27 AM
10

And yet the data completely counters your thoughts regarding who is actually in danger. In addition to this, there exists no trope where small men complain about their safety in public or at parties due to their stature.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/16 11:18 AM
5

Find me a man who has been acquitted of similar wrongdoings for similar reasons. I have all week, take your time.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/16 09:59 AM
3

Agency. They arent expected to, so therefor exhibit little agency.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/16 09:59 AM
4

This is OP replying to myself: Consider very young children for a moment. Some parents tell a kid to pick themselves up after a fall and that they are alright, these kids seems to do fine picking themselves up. Some parents run to their children in hysterics asking the kid if its ok, checking for damage and these young children ham it up because they genuinely believe that whatever just happened to them (a fall, a scratch etc) is a really big deal because their direct companions (mum, dad) encou…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/16 09:58 AM
1

So what about countries which have little to zero gang crime? Why dont the stats in those countries agree with you?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/16 09:55 AM
2

Except for all of those stabbings bashings and murders, sure. That like saying that women are safe from rape when you eliminate all the drunk morons bitches parties and the women dressed as skanks walking home alone.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/16 08:19 AM
1

Women murder their children all the fucking time and we are so ok with it as a society we don't even count it as murder, we federally fund it.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/16 09:35 PM
16

I've never felt unsafe walking alone to my car at night. And yet as a man you ARE less safe. Edit, the irony : Women are constantly being pandered to, and their safety is so important to us as a society that all the attention they get about their personal safety actually leads them to believe that they are at a higher risk of danger than men. Hard to believe, but that seems to be how it works.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/16 09:25 PM
0

oh, he is saying that voluntering to be 10 ranks down the line, piuttingyour hand up to die for someone elses cause, in maximum bitch position, aint that alpha.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/16 11:33 AM
1

ahh, a little. Not sure the relevance here
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/16 10:14 AM
2

All of my this.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/16 08:37 AM
2

vaginal test showing trauma How do yoi even do this with a dick?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/16 04:47 AM
3

I dont care, I dont have issues with attachment, she says nah Im like, "cool, whats your friends name?"
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/16 08:54 AM
2

impossible to know if you are being sarcastic or ambiguous on purpose or dead serious.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/16 07:12 AM
0

True for me, I just come on PPD to see how the other half lives.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/16 07:11 AM
2

I was almost raped (you will ask what almost is - I was shoved against the door and asked to be released several times starting at the moment I was shoved against the door) Sounds like you were intimidated, not nearly raped.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/16 06:10 AM
1

I know a bunch of people that have been accused of all sorts of shit that no one believed. Women also say all sorts of BS about their exes being violent, or cheaters or whatever at the end of a relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/16 06:09 AM
2

I also find it hard to believe that you are being honest.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/16 06:08 AM
1

Oh no, my crotch has been grabbed many a time in venues, not immediately upon eye contact but way way before any verbal consent has been given. By your definition thats assault, so nah.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/16 11:18 PM
1

This is a political debate sub. This particular vote just about perfectly splits the two halves of our membership.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/16 11:15 PM
6

HONEST TO GOD ITS A PROPER DISCUSSION LET IT HAPPEN.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/16 02:09 PM
1

they approach with dancing, or eye contact but no woman is walking up and grabbing my crotch, australia.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/16 10:15 AM
1

If its something 2 guys can and will do casually, its not sexual. So 2 is probably completely fine socially and certainly isnt assault, no implied or possible threat. 3 is completely fine because of the context, and again has no implied or possible threat. None of these are assault. 3 has a sexual context but its fine due to context, and 2 almost certainly has no sexual context but even if it did it certainly isnt assault.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/16 09:29 AM
3

My new favorite redditor. You have a way with words and ideas, my friend.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/16 09:25 AM
5

He is a physicist, not a political expert. Thomas Sowell has it figured out, intellectuals think that they are experts in every field not just their specialty, and they sure arent.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/16 09:24 AM
1

Before "taking the red pill" were you at all successful with women? Yeah How often would women approach you in a club, bar or social event? Women dont approach shit at clubs and bars, social events often enough. How often would you have one night stands or have any sex at all? Reasonably often, 25% success rate. If you were a constant failure in this regard, was frustration with this the primary driver for you to adopt red pill ideals? I used TRP to brush up when I came back on the market after …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/16 09:18 AM
1

My mrs, my ex mrs, and my main side chick when I was single all agree with 99% of TRP premises, to the point of laughing at guys in their life who TRP would consider BP, about their pathetic BP behaviours.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/16 08:56 AM
0

Good for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/16 07:18 AM
1

Ah, yeah you've completely missed what the conversation is about.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/16 01:50 AM
1

You should read The 48 laws Of Power or Machiavelli's The Prince. Honestly, some people go through life naively being nice to everyone and trying to be a good person and a whole fuckload, including all of those successful people you want to be like some day, do not. They are thinking about what power balances exist in relationships around them, how to negotiate with allies and take from enemies. Naive to think you can get on top with niceness. It doesnt work for lions, wolves, eagles, anything, …
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/16 12:26 AM
1

Sucks to be you.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/16 09:02 AM
1

Ill use the leftist argument again. It takes two to tango. Having sex is consent to parenthood.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/16 04:12 AM
1

50% of the people in financial.abortion threads.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/16 12:37 AM
1

The whole thread?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/16 11:58 PM
1

forced births? Doesn't the common argument go: 'Men consent to parenthood at conception' ???
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/16 11:48 PM
1

http://www.nbcnews.com/news/asian-america/indiana-has-now-charged-two-asian-american-women-feticide-n332761 Theres one for fetal homicide. Its not double murder but it illustrates my point, its murder if I do it, but not if the mother does it. Is this not a great example of the OP premise? (wow)
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/16 11:29 PM
0

No, we are talking about the women are wonderful effect and a great example of the exceptions society happily makes for womens behaviour.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/16 11:18 PM
1

lol thats HIS point. " Someone touched my bum, WAAAAAAAHHH! "
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/16 11:03 PM
0

Unborn victims of violence act for the US. I'm australian so I had to google that for you. Depending where you are in the world its often called "fetal homicide".
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/16 11:02 PM
2

they're both a symptom, and another gentle push off that cliff. Obviously. "enjoy the decline' means, to me, its too late you're one person, take the good parts and fuck everyone else, You cant fix it so take advantage of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/16 10:47 PM
3

Read the post above yours and check the points.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/16 10:23 PM
2

Actaully he has said that 23% are idiots..
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/16 01:42 AM
8

incredibly poor use of sarcasm, you either dont understand awalt or you only want to convince morons.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/16 01:01 AM
29

nonconsensual touching Lumped in with rape. Who cares about this study again?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/16 12:31 AM
10

Trump literally is just about to win presidency, if you think that means nothing about society as a wholes thoughts on 'progressivism' then I dont know what to say to you.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/16 12:28 AM
2

This is a debate thread. He said his belief which he clearly thinks is self evident, he then gave an example, you are free to refute it. So far you have refused to refute it, using the tactic of intellectual dishonesty. So either stop posting or refute it with evidence. You also intentionally left out some details within his point because you want to move the goalposts. I noticed that too. So either refute the exact and actual point made, or we will all know that you are using a combo of tactics…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/16 12:13 AM
1

We arent talking about threats of force only. Negotiations work in 2 directions. By this I mean from one party to the other and back again AND threats, or rewards. For example, mummy might say to the child to stop having a tantrum otherwise she will take away the childs toys, in addition to this if he behaves himself she will reward him with lollies. It is then up to the child to weigh up both the negatives and positives vs what he or she wants, which right now appears to be to misbehave, the re…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/16 12:11 AM
4

His point is exactly what he said, He basically said: I believe X, and if you dont, you can refute it. Here is a well known example of X, which I have used to demonstrate my point and allow common ground for discussion, since you are likely also aware of this example of X. If you didnt get that the first time, you are a little to dense to bother arguing with. Its like the pigeon and chess analogy. http://goodmorningkeywest.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/pigeon-playing-chess.png
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/16 11:50 PM
1

Is this your genuine full understanding of the international relations picture? If so, I basically dont have the time to school you on enough of it for you to understand me, and it sounds as though you would be unwilling to have your opinion changed anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/16 11:47 PM
2

Firstly, you are an animal. Secondly, its hard to believe that you genuinely misunderstand the OP. It was very clear and repeated points you are pretending to not understand. If you cant post without using intellectual dishonesty, please dont post.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/16 11:44 PM
4

Well, you are so bad at communication that I wont bother to engage you any further. The things you are posting lead me to naturally believe that you are using the debate tactic 'intellectual dishonesty' which is very popular on PPD, specifically from the blue side. Its where a person claims to have so little communication and/or social skill that they are unable to see the other persons point, and intentionally argue past the other persons point in order to avoid refuting it, usually because the…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/16 11:40 PM
1

Sounds like your very full of yourself and have little to no real world experience. Probably a law student. So basically, whoever has the balance of power gets what they want unless they ask for or try to force something which is worse than what they can threaten. Since the US can genuinely threaten every country on the planet except china and russia, and they can economically damage both china and russia to a small degree before its worth not doing it, they literally can ask for pretty much wha…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/16 11:37 PM
1

Have you ever done any kind of negotiating as part of a job or hobby?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/16 11:33 PM
1

Are you honestly telling me that you are not being intellectually dishonest here?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/16 11:31 PM
1

I would love to see some evidence that I am wrong. Signed, someone not american.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/16 11:30 PM
5

Rihanna is now the baseline for how all women act? You know full well that is not their point, yet you behave as though it is. Stop being intellectually dishonest or fuck off.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/16 11:26 PM
1

They dont have the balance of power. Therefore, it matters not if they like us. Like us or hate us they must do whatever it is we can force them to do.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/16 11:23 PM
1

You're either joking or not really very aware of international relations. Name a middle eastern power which can force americas hand economically.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/16 10:57 PM
2

An example of what to enjoy
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/16 10:51 PM
9

Absolutely. The left gained power silently and only now at its peak are we seeing right leaning attitudes fighting back. Just look at trumps success. What is great is that the left is so conceited that it finds the right completely unthreatening, that will be the lefts undoing, the swing back right will come as a total shock, and the left will be left with nothing but denial.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/16 10:49 PM
1

No. Honestly its about leverage. It dieent matter if they know your making the deal with little or no compromise if their hands are tied.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/16 10:44 PM
2

Its objectively true that men and women trade provision for sex. Objectively.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/16 10:30 PM
3

There are a lot of 40+ divorced men who's personal life experiences have led them to agree.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/16 09:58 AM
1

In my opinion, ppds biggest problem is incredible and repetitive intellectual dishonesty. Its a rubbish tactic used incredibly regularly here and its purpose is just to shut down debate however it seems that mods are completely fine with it. Its impossible to call someone out for it because only 2 options are available, either the person themselves is dishonest, and calling someone out for dishonesty is banned, or the person is genuinely unintelligent, again, you cannot complain about this trait…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/16 09:53 AM
1

Women are the net recievers of tax while men are the net payers of tax. Even though all of these women are 'successful', and out-jobbing men, or whatever, it only appears this way on the surface, men as a whole are still financially and physically supporting women just like always.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/16 11:18 PM
2

Its incredibly straight forward. Either give men as many choices as women have and hold both genders equally responsible. Or give men far more opportunity and leave the huge responsibility with them. Or take away all of the womens choices and leave them with the huge lack of responsibility they currently have.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/16 11:12 PM
1

Right they see studs as studs and guys who they arent into that sleep around as sleezes.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/16 12:05 PM
1

They wouldn't think he was a slut. Slut/stud double standard.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/16 07:30 AM
0

Look.woman, In nature its hugely swayed in favour of men. In society its hugely swayed in favour if women. We as a species used law to sway it hugely from one end to the other. The least we could do is settle it in the middle.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/16 04:41 AM
0

Most women say this. But their actions betray their words.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/16 04:38 AM
0

Thats not even close to a serious answer.. Do you expect to be taken seriously here?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/16 12:34 AM
1

You're just outright wrong in the aggregate. A man with multiple options is more attractive than a man with none to most women. Any woman worth pursuing always has multiple options, proving it by fucking all of them lowers how attractive she is to most men. Disliking this because it offends you based on your personal lifestyle choices doesnt change the facts.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/16 11:40 PM
3

Most peoples jobs are full of health and safety concers. You're an adult choose a job which has risks which you are confortable with.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/16 06:11 AM
3

I didn't say you were a sucker I said that you have no understanding of economics. You're so far off base, I would defend the regs rather than rant about them.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/16 05:45 AM
5

You are economically illiterate. A child. Ive spoken to your type before and you understand so little about the basics of economics that there ia just no point.Goodbye.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/16 05:21 AM
7

How is dress code "behaving like children". Those making the rules OWN THE BUSINESS. They own it. They arent arbitrary leaders they worked their hands to the bone to be the boss and make the rules. Feel free to start your own business and let all the ladies wear thongs. Why do you feel the need to treat women like children? Why do you have to get angry at the people who run a business that the women chose to work in? Do you get angry when you find out soldiers have to get shot at? When you find …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/16 05:03 AM
5

Its a dress code. A fucking dress code. Its part of your work uniform. If you dont like it work somewhere else. Men have all sorts of requirements for their jobs, so do women. Move on, be an adult, stop telling women its ok to act like children, like they cant make the decision to work in an environments which has requirements that they are ok with. Why do you have to belittle women so much you assume they cannot realise this and make decisions for themselves? Stop treating women like children, …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/16 04:51 AM
0

Yes, your experience with one guy as a female is the best perspective for figuring out how men attract women. Thanks for that.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/16 03:12 AM
1

I know, and so blacks have lower IQ. Not surprisingly the language required for IQ is also required for general life success.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/16 01:53 AM
0

You're just objectively wrong, a first date shouldnt be an interview if you are a man looking for success. You want to get her heavily into you sexually. She will have no problem accompanying you to something if she really wants to fuck you, or if she has fucked you and loved it. You're a noob at this.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/16 01:44 AM
0

She is happy to state objective facts which are offensive. Like black people have lower IQ than jews (she is neither), and their problems are caused primarily by their cultural.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/16 12:23 AM
1

You believe that if he wants a relationship then getting her to want to submit to him sexually asap is bad. Thats where you are completely wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/16 12:20 AM
-1

Completely wrong, whether she is a low or high n count, doing what will make her want to fuck you Is the most important first step, attraction is king. Approach immediately.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/16 11:41 PM
16

That's absolutely not what they said at all. They said trying to be better than your competition is a mating strategy. Stop posting until you can post without strawmen.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/16 11:33 PM
4

My partner just sees 3rd wave for what it is. She is also racist by modern left wing standards, she just calls it exactly as she sees it.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/16 11:32 PM
9

If we both have problems then its not 'systemic oppression' or whatever, its just the human experience. Most men and tonnes of women are really fucking sick of hearing about womens problems, you're your own worst enemies. Opinions like yours make you all sound like children, complaints like I have to wear heels at work (dress code), people treat me with less respect in some work environments (men get lumped with more responsibility) etc are just childish, pathetic and selfish, both genders have …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/16 11:22 PM
8

OP answer me with a flat yes or no. women DO have equal rights and all that on the surface, there are still systemic barriers that affect all of us subconsciously for the most part Do you believe that society provides men with no uniquely male barriers either socially, politically or in the workplace?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/16 08:28 AM
0

Experience doesnt exist in your world? Cant meet 100 asians and notice that they are almost always short, 100 africans and notice they are almost always black?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/16 07:07 AM
0

Until he proves otherwise experience tells me its most likely.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/16 04:39 AM
1

Are you female? If so I'd like to see a picture of you to judge whether its likely that you have any social experience. You seem to be claiming that an average guy with no girl in a public social event is just as appealing to women as an average guy easily entertaining 3 girls he brought with him. This is such an insane assertion I can only imagine that you've not had much romantic interaction. Post a photo please.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/16 03:18 AM
1

Its based on reality. You're living on a different planet if you think looks aren't part of the value people put into the romantic relationahips. Nutcase.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/16 03:16 AM
2

You have GOT to be joking.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/16 10:40 PM
3

Yeah only dumb cunts like fitness...
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/16 11:33 AM
2

Tell him how and where to get this new group of friends. Go ahead.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/16 11:28 AM
1

I think you missed it. Your mocking only further proves his point.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/16 08:10 AM
2

I'm pretty sure he is mocking you and doesn't care.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/16 11:37 PM
1

Like having to earn it just like men do? Fuck me lady you're whack
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/16 03:01 PM
1

Men do. Every minute. I did. Toughen up princess.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/16 12:51 AM
1

Its literally unimportant, if they wanted it so bad, and were just as good as men at getting it, they too would have gone and fought for it. Its exactly like businesses today. If you don't like wesring heels at work start your own businesses, but we see huge underachievement even now also.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/16 08:20 PM
3

anthropological Literally, throughout all of time from all of recorded history to now, women have been the underachieving sex in terms of creating society. Men are the underachieving sex in terms of creating life. Why this is beyond you is beyond me.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/16 12:39 PM
3

I take it you're satisfied with my answer?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/16 12:31 PM
3

A mazda today, Even better, here is a product shot I took for my website. http://s32.postimg.org/3u3oqwczp/IMG_7805_001_1.jpg
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/16 12:17 PM
2

Yeah but other behaviours wouldnt be tolerated in a man that is tolerated in women, both in work and out of work. Almost as if we arent identical and dont get treated as though we are.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/16 12:15 PM
3

Racecar parts and in part, my business.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/16 12:13 PM
5

No, women are still useless compared to men at getting shit built, made, invented, fixed etc You've got to be joking.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/16 12:00 PM
1

A business and a worker should be able to agree to any terms they want including dress code.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/16 11:55 AM
3

yeah, the system hates annoying narky bitches, no shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/16 11:49 AM
1

OMG someone talked to me, waaaah! How fucking priviliged are you if this is a legitimate problem?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/16 03:12 AM
1

Not sure many guys want the reality of what a phd engineer gf with 6 figure income is like.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/16 02:12 AM
3

Mine is a gorgeous generous sweetheart, she massages me when I get home from work and brings me surprise beer all the time, shes hot AF, and has a count of 2, including me, I got to show her so many new experiences and have such a great time being her rock. Thanks RP
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/16 11:53 PM
0

Got some upvotes. Apparently Im not the only one who thinks the entire female planet should just drop the bitching about stuff that may or may not have been bad for someone else who happens to share the same genitals.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/16 09:34 PM
2

Honestly OP, it has nothing to do with you so shut up.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/16 12:19 PM
4

problematic "I dont like it"
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/16 12:16 PM
1

Thor is jacked on roids, no joke it isn't sexy its nothing like anything in nature.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/16 05:17 AM
1

The short answer is.. Why would this possibly be true?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/16 11:16 AM
1

Op is obviously right. So mich intellectual dishonesty is found here and ops example is a common use of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/16 02:21 AM
4

I'm way over people here taking wording literally as a way to get around arguing against the points being made.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/16 02:15 AM
1

Its the ultimate means to all human problems. You still glossed over the animals you woukd use force against and all the people threatened with force to get your hypothetical house built. Its the ultimate meams weather you like it or not.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/16 11:41 PM
1

Honestly dude, if you want to take every single word literally and ignore the points you very well know are being made, why even bother.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/16 01:21 PM
3

I get it, you are taking what I said completely literally and intentionally missing the point even though you understand my point and know that it is correct, good job.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/16 11:00 AM
1

I dont think you have any further points.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/16 10:53 AM
2

Feel free to build it however you want now. Try not to use violence on any animals to feed yourself or get your materials now.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/16 10:47 AM
2

Good deflection. Now, go ahead and show me how ultimately, your right to build a house on that land, and your right to own the components and tools, are not defended with physical force.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/16 10:41 AM
0

Im not going to give you any more of my time, you know what you did.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/16 10:33 AM
2

The social contract. Im keen to hear you explain how it doesnt ultimately lead to physical force. Again, Ive got all night.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/16 10:29 AM
2

And how does your local regulatory board ultimately ensure you have those rights?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/16 10:24 AM
2

Youd probably need to use your property rights, as a start, would you agree with that?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/16 10:14 AM
1

Honest to god, this has genuinely been discussed to death and everyone both sides has consistently seen that both men and women view love for their partners and respect as a whole differently. Look up the threads, stop insulting me, and just look it up.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/16 10:10 AM
0

Assuming we make this work long term, and assuming we decide to have kids, I suspect we'd both prefer an arrangement where he stays home Check the divorce stats in this scenario. Id suggest youd find this to be incorrect.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/16 10:06 AM
1

Feel free to refute what I just said, I have all night.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/16 10:00 AM
3

Because violence is THE means to all ends.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/16 09:55 AM
3

http://www.adherents.com/people/100_heroes.html Theres a list, almost all men and almost all violent.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/16 09:50 AM
4

heroic men often ARE violent.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/16 09:48 AM
6

Are you conflating gun owner ship/baldness/jobs that include force etc with being a hyperviolent emotional cripple?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/16 09:30 AM
6

Yeah, and its not like men since the dawn of time have attracted women by being masculine and powerful.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/16 09:11 AM
1

Search PPD, its been discussed to death. Same as respect, I bet you and he feel differently about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/16 08:27 AM
3

In what? Its just info, use it as you please.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/16 08:26 AM
4

No one here said better or more pure. Its just a lesson to be learned that women will noy love you in the same way you will love them. No judhement is needed
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/16 06:32 AM
3

They don't define love in the same way men do. Like I said above. They call it love but it iant what men call love.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/16 04:37 AM
1

Yep
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/16 04:36 AM
4

There are plenty of threads here discussing how men love women vs how women love men. Just like the male definitiin of respect vs the female definition of respect, there are differences that appear innate, and yet most people don't realise the genders view these concepts differently.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/16 01:20 AM
2

If you leave a relationship with the intent to ever fond another relationship, you hope the next one will be a better partner for you. Obviously.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/16 01:18 AM
1

He said they vote to let in immigrants who oppose the rights that men gave women. If you believe that islamic sympathizers defend the womens rights which western men gave to women, you have got to be trolling.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/16 01:16 AM
1

OP said that women vote left, this brings in immigrants who oppose our societies values and rights. It is infact true that women vote left, it is true that this increases immigrants, and its true that many immigrants openly oppose the rights our society values and fought to have.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/16 12:55 AM
6

You're trolling. Last reply to you. Your either a troll or you literally have no argument because men are superior.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/16 12:51 AM
4

Im defending the point OP made, which is that women vote left and this takes away things that men faught for. I didnt write the OP, I just said that he is right in saying that women vote left, which tends to be against the wishes of men, and the things we fought for. Infact, OP said that the immigrants openly oppose our rights, not that women take them away.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/16 12:49 AM
2

If you have stats on how many women leave their man for someone "better" please add them Wouldnt that be every woman that starts a new relationship ever? Well how does this fit with TRP's belief that men are more loyal to women than women are to men? Since we are using that context for this discussion. Dont know, dont care, TRP exists to help men realise that women are in it for themselves, I dont care if men are too, the message that women are is all thats important to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/16 12:47 AM
9

He posts a tonne of factual things with some anger mixed in, why does that make him a troll? You cant even refute any of what he is saying.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/16 12:43 AM
8

Here 2 links to show women vote left as asserted here: Voting to let in savages who openly state their intention to revoke the rights we men so foolishly handed to women. First is oxford journal http://qje.oxfordjournals.org/content/117/3/917.abstract And another study here http://www.politics.ubc.ca/fileadmin/user_upload/poli_sci/Faculty/cutler/GenderDifferences.pdf Ok now its your turn to refute some.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/16 12:32 AM
2

Hypergamy doesn't mean you need to cheat, you could just break up with your boyfriend and move on to the next. This.. obviously.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/16 12:23 AM
5

There a tonne of accurate content in that post. Go on, refute some.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/16 12:22 AM
5

Women love all of that shit because it indicates that a man can do his job within the male/female relationship dynamic.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/16 12:13 AM
2

Yes
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/16 06:25 AM
2

Your anecdote regarding 2 people has completely convinced me, thankyou.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/16 04:51 AM
1

No one anywhere said that your WHOLE personality came from TV. WTF ! Honestly, im sure this BS attitude gets you attention IRL, but im done.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/16 02:15 AM
1

Seriously, I bet you think advertising has no effect on you either. Your such an individual!
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/16 01:54 AM
1

But I don't get my personality from the media Naivety.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/16 12:53 AM
1

Its true that its a rule. Look at the data. Holy shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/16 12:57 AM
1

I got 3 sentences in and basically, its fine if you are an outlier, but it doesnr disprove the rule. The numbers easily prove it.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/16 12:13 AM
1

Its true for all of them, that because they are women they are less competitive and have less incentive than if they were the male equivalents of themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/16 11:08 PM
1

Every time the word woman is used here its reffering to them collectively as a group, directly contrasted against the collective male group.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/16 11:05 PM
1

Womans average incentive is lower than mans average incentive, the result is that women just dont achieve as much as men do, outside of birthing and nurturing humans.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/16 11:04 PM
1

thus the incentive to make money is there for women as well. Money is simply not as valuable to women as it is to men. Not only do men get utility from the money they get status from both men and especially from women. Its a HUGE incentive that women simply do not have.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/16 02:01 PM
1

This is a conversation about the relative differences in 2 groups.. You are dense. Like way too dense for this, or trolling.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/16 02:00 PM
3

You're arguing with intellectual dishonesty. You are trying to be as literal as possible to make the other poster look inconsistent so you can mock via sarcasm. Stop it.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/16 09:11 AM
1

You know more heteros
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/16 09:01 AM
3

good effort with the low quality insult.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/16 08:59 AM
1

Ok, for interest sakes, have you heard people say that money (physical currency) is more valuable to men than women? I do believe this is true, and I believe that it has to do with biological imperatives, and this is the reason why men earn more of it, and do the things that help earn more of it, and sacrifice others things in order to get it. We have more incentive as a gender to build things, fix things, provide services for money.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/16 04:32 AM
1

You are... dense, or trolling. No one on the planet said that there arent individual women who are driven compared to the average human. Ever, no one said or implied this. Why do you think you need to defend this idea?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/16 04:30 AM
1

If I'm not being trolled, let me know and ill write out an easy to read long response tonight complete with graphs.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/16 03:13 AM
1

No, women aren't incentivised biologically to work as hard or go as far, and they lack the hormones required to be competitive in their pursuits. That simple.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/16 03:11 AM
1

What number go against what I'm saying!? And of course people in real life wont say this, its offensive.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/16 01:51 AM
1

It has nothing to do with my opinion. Pick an attribute and look at what the numbers say.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/16 01:30 AM
1

Women as a group, and not as good as men, as a group. Its undisputable, and exactly what the mras are saying.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/16 01:12 AM
1

If you take all of the women on earth, and all the men on earth. In no way am I arguing that there arent some great women somewhere. Women just dont have the incentives or genetic makeup to be as good as men at men things.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/16 12:02 AM
1

Dude. We are talking about both genders as a whole. You know this or you wouldn't keep moving tge goalposts.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/16 10:45 PM
1

We arent talking about individuals.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/16 03:23 AM
6

It just means to ask people who are successful at something how to be successful at it. You dont ask a bed how to lay down." You dont ask a brick how to pave. You dont ask a woman how to pick up women.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/16 02:10 AM
1

a man Stop moving the fucking goalposts.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/16 01:59 AM
1

I mean is unable to be. Yep, wont be. Etc
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/16 11:46 PM
1

I fully understand and endorse the bellcurve differences. But you still can't find a providing/ protecting activity where the average woman is better.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/16 11:43 PM
5

Who cares? The point is clear, and the point is solid advice.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/16 11:30 PM
1

Yeah, some women doing overtime. Who does more? Yeah, some women getting paid more. Who does much more often? Yeah some.women being recognjsed fornsuccess and hard work. But who does more often? You're literally arguing against a rule with anecdotes and outliers.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/16 11:20 PM
1

Thats a nice thought, but regardless, for whatever the reason, women always have and even with all the incentives and programs still don't compete with men in the vast majority of activities. I'd like to believe I know why. But it doesnt matter why, all that matters is that it is true. Btw I never said women should be held back or anything, I just said they they are inferior, we have plenty of evidence, and you cannot prove otherwise.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/16 11:18 PM
1

You're arguing against a point no one has made. The point is clear. You take all women on earth, and all men on earth, and you compare how good they are at everything. Women are on top with birthing and nurturing children, as they should be. Men are on top at providing for and protecting those women and children. They do this by building more shit, working more hours, taking more risks with their own health etc. But the fact remains that if you oit one group against the other in any task that is…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/16 11:03 PM
1

I wouldn't be exactly the same but with a vagina if I were a woman. Believing that the only difference is what the genitals LOOK like is silly. There are tonnes if sifferences way beyond that. And when you have 2 groups containing 3,000,000,000 each its very easy to look at the aggregate and see differences. One if thos is that women are better at making and nurturing children, and men are better at protecting and providing for women and their children. This is not my opinion, its bourne out in …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/16 11:00 PM
1

We arent discussing individuals.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/16 10:42 PM
1

I didn't read past the first few sentances. My dog example is just like your woman example. Sure there is a woman somewhere better than most men at som3 things, just like there is a dog somewhere better than some people at some things.. But we can agree as you are furiously arguing that just because there are a few circumstances where a dog is better they are inferior overall. Like women. Or... give me examples of women as a whole keeping up without artificial help.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/16 10:42 PM
1

I didn't read past the first few sentances. My dog example is just like your woman example. Sure there is a woman somewhere better than most men at som3 things, just like there is a dog somewhere better than some people at some things.. But we can agree as you are furiously arguing that just because there are a few circumstances where a dog is better they are inferior overall. Like women.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/16 10:38 PM
1

Excuses.. all week long.. Literally women choose to do less than men in just about fucking everything, so... inferior.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/16 08:56 PM
1

Its people yelling shit online... Ive heard it all, and I dont care either.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/16 08:55 PM
1

mentally stable Way to move the goalposts. Didnt read past that.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/16 08:55 PM
2

There are individual dogs that function better than individual humans. It doesn't change anything. You cannot be serious.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/16 02:21 PM
2

Because the thing I'm arguing against is how women are inferior. You just said it yourself. "If there are five million women who are better than most men..." Essentially proves that women are not inferior to men. You -must- be trolling us?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/16 01:48 PM
2

Right. Pointing out there are multitudes of successful women = no proof. This is why red pillers are delusional. OH MY GAWD WOMAN. Youre doing your 'wimminz are gudder than menz" argument no justice by repeatedly talking past the point. If there are 5 million great women who are better than most men that proves nothing because there are almost 8 billion humans and the point is that men, overall are better than women, overall, at getting anything done thats not birthing or nurturing children. And…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/16 01:34 PM
3

intellectually dishonest PPD in a nutshell. And yes, absolutely.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/16 01:18 PM
5

But yet men overall get more shit online. Wonder why some women think different.. (hey guys... im a gurrll. treat me special...)
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/16 12:54 PM
1

Youve given zero proof. Explain why there is a womens league for literally everything. Womens laws to help them keep up with men in almost all fields. Womens awards for literally everything.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/16 12:51 PM
5

OK, go ahead.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/16 11:42 AM
4

Are you... serious? The claim is that men as a whole are better than women as a whole.. you know, at achieving things..? Not if there is one woman somewhere who is better at running that christopher reeves.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/16 08:56 AM
1

Plenty of evidence. Womens sporting leagues. Womens income. Womens gaming leagues if you want something competitive with zero strength required. Womens income. etc etc etc
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/16 07:31 AM
2

How does "these 3 women are better than you" have any bearing on the argument "women are equal to men"?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/16 07:30 AM
3

Insane strawman.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/16 03:43 AM
12

I think OP is just pointing out how women have it so easy that even online where we can prove that they have it easier they still think they have it harder.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/16 03:01 AM
0

A decent portion of the Manosphere thinks women are inferior to men. You'd really need to prove otherwise if you wanted to get mad about this opinion.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/16 02:58 AM
1

I didnt say that. Even so, you are wrong, defacto relationships make marriage a forced legal issue.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/16 12:47 PM
2

Well, my point is, if youre ok with the got having tonnes of mandatory involvement in relationships, why not this? Doesnt this need to be implemented to balance the system (which i think shouldnt exist)?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/16 11:11 AM
3

I think the govt shouldn't be involved in relationships whatsoever. I think the govt shouldn't be involved in relationships whatsoever. But if they are to be, why not force other stuff, like testing, seems necessary to balance all the other shit they force on us.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/16 11:01 AM
4

I am a libertarian, I think the govt shouldn't be involved in relationships whatsoever. Do you agree with this also? Or are you hypocritical in this aspect?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/16 10:32 AM
5

The father would need to consent in order to receive a govt service, having his name placed on his childs govt provided certificate of birth.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/16 10:11 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter