| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The first step towards making post-wall women's poor family planning decisions mandated & paid for by taxpayersIf there is any good news to be taken out of this, it's that it's probably also a closer step towards developing artificial wombs. Ends up being a great marketing strategy to convince our gynocentric society to fund and develop something that whilst still prioritising female reproduction, shifts the centre of the focus from the individual woman's body to a locus external to her but still in promotion of her interests (theoretically anyway). Other than selling artificial wombs as a means to relea… | /r/TheRedPill | 15/10/14 06:54 PM |
| 7 | There is a "new masculinity" wherein women & betas re-label traditional markers of male success as "sexist" or "divisive". It's a comforting mechanism by which losers will try to redefine failure as success and success as wrong.Well by definition, the majority of men are 'beta' (average). But I don't think MGTOW are claiming it is an 'alpha' decision, rather that it's a rational decision in their particular case. | /r/TheRedPill | 07/10/14 07:07 PM |
| 16 | There is a "new masculinity" wherein women & betas re-label traditional markers of male success as "sexist" or "divisive". It's a comforting mechanism by which losers will try to redefine failure as success and success as wrong.RE: MGTOW There is an underlying movement (not just among TRP but the Internet and confused young men in general) that buys into the idea that "masculinity is divisive". Yeah, according to feminism. According to incels who are young and frustrated and have never heard of MGTOW. They themselves have been on the short end of the stick with regards to sex, success, status, etc. Well TRP teaches 20% gets 80%, so that should be a given, no? They don't like their current positions (who would blame the… | /r/TheRedPill | 07/10/14 06:00 PM |
| 7 | Grand Unified Theory of GameIf you believe that patriarchal civilisation serves male interest and male interest only, you are succumbing to both apex fallacy and the idea that women are best served by being completely and utterly free. If you take it to the end, then absence of civilisation serves the majority female interest. Problem is, in a state of nature you have rape and zero room for feminine agency. Which means that it must then be concluded that in a state of nature, or as a natural interest, women have no agency … | /r/TheRedPill | 07/10/14 12:31 PM |
| 3 | Lessons Learned From Online Dating PT. IIOP definitely has game, and his posts have a bunch of good advice. The problem I see here is that it is clear from the responses he received and his strike rate that he is pretty much model tier. His lifestyle (portrayed in the pics) is also basically unattainable for the average guy. So yeah, everyone should try to get to the top and following good advice is part of that. But beyond tailoring your lifestyle to be appealing in an online dating setting the advice is essentially 'be tall and good … | /r/TheRedPill | 03/10/14 07:59 AM |
| 1 | The origin of the sexual double standard - a theoryAbstract from a Baumeister study titled 'Cultural Suppression of Female Sexuality': Four theories about cultural suppression of female sexuality are evaluated. Data are reviewed on cross-cultural differences in power and sex ratios, reactions to the sexual revolution, direct restraining influences on adolescent and adult female sexuality, double standard patterns of sexual morality, female genital surgery, legal and religious restrictions on sex, prostitution and pornography, and sexual deceptio… | /r/TheRedPill | 29/09/14 01:39 AM |
| 8 | A Red Pill Story of Biblical Proportions...Not the same Joseph but this reminded me of the immaculate conception. Joseph was the original cuckold. Imagine trying to deal with Mary being alpha widowed by God himself... | /r/TheRedPill | 25/09/14 08:27 PM |
| 0 | Ultimate Red Pill: PolygynyIt isn't run by a secret cabal though. Technological development alone will lead almost with certainty to communism in some form. If you eliminate or even greatly reduce the need for the exploitation of productive labour, you get Communism. Those visions of tyrannical government haunting you? I think if anything that is possible but would be part of a transition phase where masses of people become unemployed (because of technology). Enough uprisings and increase of government as provider (the la… | /r/TheRedPill | 24/09/14 05:18 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter