TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Brintyboo Archive

View 5 posts and 31 comments by Brintyboo on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

That's the point. That's the logic the original article used to claim that false accusations basically never happen, then lost his shit when he had that horrible analysis thrown back at him.
/r/MensRights10/12/15 05:49 AM
2

Commenting so I can find this again later.
/r/MensRights10/12/15 05:48 AM
4

I think the difference is that people use 'check your privilege' as if it is a legitimate argument, when it's really just a suppression technique. Calling someone a 'feminazi' is childish name-calling at best. It doesn't even have the guise of being a valid critique. On a scale of 'shitty things to say while fighting on the internet', I would say 'check your privilege' is a decent few rungs above 'feminazi'.
/r/MensRights10/11/14 11:46 AM
3

When I get back to Australia in maybe 18 months time, I'll be really interested in seeing how this progresses. I really hope people seize this opportunity to make a difference in the lives of men and boys.
/r/MensRights30/10/14 12:47 PM
12

I don't think the point is that he aborted the child, but because he drugged the woman. The abortion was just a tragic side effect. The woman could have gotten seriously ill or died, not to mention the trauma of having a miscarriage and the betrayal of finding out how. That guy got what he deserved, this baby-killer though, has not, and I am thoroughly disturbed that they're so willing to cave into a woman's 'remorse'.
/r/MensRights31/01/14 08:54 AM
2

But by the same token, the new husband shouldn't be held financially responsible for her/your boyfriend's kids. We need to stop making financial responsibility the man's job, hold the mother accountable. I imagine if she was actually using that money for the children you wouldn't be so mad, so maybe you can come to a different arrangement? When my parents spilt, my dad didn't pay child support, but he was in charge of my schooling and medical expenses (mum would pay for other general living expe…
/r/MensRights19/12/13 12:05 AM
2

True, although the focus is relevant, it being the only thing discussed kinda gives off the vibe that men should attend this seminar in the interests of women and not necessarily themselves.
/r/MensRights19/10/13 10:59 PM
7

But they don't say that masculinity = misogyny. They say that "issues of masculinity" can often promote "misogynistic and socialized hyper-masculine attitudes". Which is true! There ARE forms of hyper-masculinity that men are pressured or conditioned into that promote misogyny. Masculinity is broad and there are many different types, highlighting and addressing the issues in one of these forms is hardly saying that masculinity = misogyny. It's saying that our current definition of socially accep…
/r/MensRights19/10/13 02:22 AM
1

I don't think there's anything wrong in having preferences and I'm not 'attacking' women for having these preferences, but that doesn't change the fact that these preferences/trends result in a sociological pattern that groups of men and women seem to dislike. This is why I call 'having it all' unrealistic. Either you can have all your preferences met and re-enforce current gender roles, or you can re-consider your preferences (yes, it's possible!) and challenge these roles. Some people are perf…
/r/MensRights19/10/13 02:13 AM
2

but you see, men don't actively 'accept' this, they just dont marry on the basis of status. That book I mentioned discusses how men honestly don't care how much a woman earns, even if it's more than him. Men don't reject women on the basis of social/financial standing while women do, and I doubt encouraging men to start doing this to break the trend is a good thing. It's much more positive to encourage women to be more accepting.
/r/MensRights19/10/13 12:58 AM
11

It's difficult to explain, but the way I see it is this trend perpetuates the idea that men are work horses, they're providers and their value as a partner should be judged on their social and economic capital. The privilege aspect comes in I believe, in a woman's sense of entitlement to these things in a partner while at the same time feeling entitled to the same level of social and economic capital for herself. It links to the 'Having it All' slogan. Women will not start to become accepted in …
/r/MensRights18/10/13 11:12 PM
2

I agree with some of these items, but not all. In particular, how is 'feminism' a female privilege? Does that make the MRM a male privilege? Everyone, in some way or another, is born with someone that advocates for them and their rights. I wouldn't really consider it a privilege to have people care about you, that's more a basic human need. Although on that note I think some of the choices and actions made by feminists are indicative of 'female privilege'.
/r/MensRights18/10/13 10:55 PM
2

Just some context: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jW-V8aSC6Ac This video was linked to on this sub-reddit and I and a few others contacted the show in regards to our disapproval of how they handled the story. This post is a screen shot of the email I received in reply. I personally am glad she recognised her error, yet am concerned that her sentiments seem to indicate that ad this video been a hoax that would make it.... ok? That it would be ok to question and laugh at the victimisation of a ma…
/r/MensRights18/10/13 10:50 PM
2

My mistake, I'm not that familiar with American TV.
/r/MensRights09/10/13 10:09 PM
1

Well sexism against women is a men's issue. It's also a women's issue. Same deal with sexism against men. Sexism in general is society's issue, regardless of the genders involved.
/r/MensRights09/10/13 04:45 AM
15

http://au.tv.yahoo.com/sunrise/contact-us/soapbox/ Here you can send them a note about the issue.
/r/MensRights09/10/13 03:33 AM
5

I found this to be a small saving grace. Unlike that situation on The View, the other hosts didn't seem to endorse what she said at all. Although at the same time, they didn't openly reject it either.
/r/MensRights09/10/13 03:31 AM
1

So apparently, sexual harassment between same sex individuals isn't a thing. THE MORE YOU KNOW!
/r/MensRights13/09/13 03:35 AM
1

Poorly phrased question, as it does not specify the genders of the participants. Which, if you're in the UK, unfortunately means the difference between a rape and a sexual assault. It's so sad that we still live in a world where your gender determines the outcome of justice.
/r/MensRights04/06/13 07:38 AM
2

There is a 'women's space' at my university too, however, I am under the impression that it does not ban men, it's just that men wouldn't have a whole lot of use for the services it provides. Like breastfeeding rooms, tampon dispensers, and pamphlets with information on women's health (ie; pap smears). Although there is a lack of similar services for men available, which is depressing.
/r/MensRights29/05/13 04:26 AM
1

I too, found the 'apology' to be an extreme cop out. They only did it out of obligation, not because they were actually sorry.
/r/MensRights11/04/13 11:35 PM
23

Awkward that there are so many 'women and children only' shelters, yet the majority of homeless people are men.
/r/MensRights08/04/13 10:28 AM
4

I wish I lived in Toronto....... I can't stand that feminists label any men's issue action as inherently anti-feminist. I'm pretty sure that these people could care less about attacking your misguided movement by attending these lectures. I dunno, I kinda thought they were interested in the SUBJECT OF MEN'S ISSUES. Stop making it all about you and justifying your distaste by pulling quotes and stats out of context.
/r/MensRights04/04/13 09:36 PM
3

Ah, that tired old feminist argument of 'well women have it worse!'. To say something is a non-issue because other people are having a hard time is a joke. Did you know that us humans are capable of multitasking? You know, contributing time and resources to multiple things at once? And that doing so doesn't reduce the importance of one task, it just equitably manages them? It's pretty cool, you should tell your friend about it.
/r/MensRights25/03/13 06:38 AM
2

That wasn't the point of the study, the point of the study was to examine potential reasons women aren't choosing careers in STEM. They found that women who had skills in STEM also had verbal skills (unlike their male counterparts). So they deducted that these differing skill sets could explain the lack of women in STEM. As other studies (not theirs) have proven that greater verbal skills = more job opportunities, they made that deduction. That's the cool thing about research, you rarely have to…
/r/MensRights21/03/13 04:49 AM
1

I can't seem to get access to the study itself. Can someone please link me?
/r/MensRights20/03/13 10:56 AM
3

It isn't exactly a secret that better verbal skills (ie: people and conversational skills) lead to more work opportunities. Don't underestimate how powerful this skill is.
/r/MensRights20/03/13 10:55 AM
1

Telling women not to frequent dark alleys doesn't assume that all men are rapists, just the sort that hang out in dark alleys waiting for women. Reality of the world is, there are some sickos out there that will take advantage of you if you put yourself in a vulnerable position. This is easily avoided by not putting yourself in a vulnerable position. Doing this doesn't make a statement about anyone's gender.
/r/MensRights07/03/13 08:37 AM
4

She isn't a very good leader, but if Tony Abbot becomes Prime Minister, I might consider moving to NZ. I personally strictly vote Australian Sex Party.
/r/MensRights03/03/13 11:44 PM
3

Yeah no, that is completely false because it is based on a legal definition that basically says that men cannot be rapists. So of course that statistic exists. If you include women who use objects to penetrate, or force people to penetrate them, the numbers of perpetrators are comparable.
/r/MensRights25/01/13 02:07 AM
2

female-on-male rape isn't only taboo to report, but isn't even defined as rape by many legal systems (I don't know where you're from). If a woman forces a man to penetrate her, it is just classed as 'sexual assault'. Additionally, prior to Jan 2012, the US definition of rape specifically defined rape as a penis penetrating a vagina. So any rape statistics you find from the US prior to 2012 are likely to be unreliable (as they will only include instances of rape that involved a penis penetrating …
/r/MensRights25/01/13 01:55 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter