TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Broseidon241 Archive

View 0 posts and 27 comments by Broseidon241 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

I didn't say 'happy wife happy life' - that phrase makes me cringe. It brings to mind yes men, people pleasers. It's more taking responsibility for your happiness, then giving your overabundance to your spouse and child while kindly but firmly making sure they do not take you for granted (ie, being a good adult). Again, a fine line to walk, but that's what you commit to. I don't have to worry about things 'just working out'. I'll make sure they do - for all of us. And thanks for the well wishes …
/r/TheRedPill29/10/17 01:54 PM
8

This really, really strikes me as "I did a vague and common thing, but failed - like other people fail! The problem isn't me, it isn't my choice of wife or all the decisions I made about how to manage my relationship or my life - it's all women! It's The System!" I'm sorry you're in a bad situation and got taken advantage of, but it sounds to me like you just got run over by adult life and aren't identifying the actual mistakes you made. Having a child is the end to one type of life, and then yo…
/r/TheRedPill29/10/17 01:22 PM
1

No. You can be what you need to be at work and make everyone better. You know the great host at the party who can make sure everyone is having an amazing time? Doing the rounds, keeping drinks topped up, connecting people? Just be that guy at work. Destroy your stuff, help everyone else with theirs. You don't need to act submissive to do that. Be kind to others, be caring, be so good no one can ignore you.
/r/TheRedPill12/09/17 11:03 PM
1

"All you have to do is leave your house" I prefer evidence to story time, thanks.
/r/TheRedPill06/05/17 05:36 PM
5

FYI this isn't just women, this is a human being thing. This whole sub is about teaching men to stop being afraid of failure, to start taking risks without undue anxiety, etc. It's a lovely narrative you've made, but it's wrong.
/r/TheRedPill06/05/17 10:44 AM
0

It isn't ego validation, sweetpea - you made a claim about how things work across, say, the population of north america. I asked you to back it up with some large-scale data. You have nothing. I didn't make an unreasonable request. In fact, I was legitimately interested...until it turned out you were just blowing smoke. I'll keep an eye out for things on this topic in future, but I'm done talking to you.
/r/TheRedPill01/02/15 04:22 PM
0

Anecdotal evidence for really broad population-wide claims. Good job.
/r/TheRedPill01/02/15 03:28 PM
0

I haven't seen that paper - would you mind linking me to it, please?
/r/TheRedPill01/02/15 11:43 AM
-2

Instead of talking about your feelings on this issue / your 'lived experience', head over to scholar.google.com and look for psychological science on either side. Women do have more (and closer) social relationships, and they tend to live longer because of it, especially if their husband dies.
/r/TheRedPill30/01/15 02:50 PM
3

r/iamverysmart I am an expert in this area. And I am telling you: there is no gender difference regarding the FAE, or self-serving bias, or any such cognitive/motivational bias. It is a human thing. Absolutely. Very very common. It is not a fundamentally male thing. Hell, if anything, men should be worse! High testosterone makes it more difficult to take the perspective of others - this makes it easier to hurt people and overtake them. Women are, on average, more empathetic (almost always) and b…
/r/TheRedPill06/01/15 01:41 AM
8

Most people don't consider circumstances most of the time. That's why it's called the fundamental attribution error. I see a lot of "Women at their worst can't stand up to my idealized view of myself really using my head!" This fits into that. Also your evolutionary throwaway needs to be unsaid - it's nonfalsifiable and I'm guessing you don't actually work in that field (or have published within it).
/r/TheRedPill05/01/15 04:21 PM
0

This is so weird. Is this a humanities class? Gender studies? "Lived experience" > actual research? Jesus.
/r/TheRedPill01/01/15 02:44 PM
1

I see you want to play armchair researcher and tell personal stories. That's enough of this.
/r/TheRedPill01/01/15 02:42 PM
-1

Oh, man. You guys are bizarre. If we're talking about research, I want to talk research - not feelings, not hey-let-me-tell-you-a-story. Is that ridiculous? No - not at all.
/r/TheRedPill01/01/15 02:12 AM
2

This isn't about 'lived experience' or "well he said it and it fits what I've seen so therefore it's true". I don't give a shit if you 'feel like it's true' based on your 'lived experience'. I want the actual research so I can evaluate it.
/r/TheRedPill31/12/14 10:38 PM
-3

I'm going to need the source papers before I believe findings related through a game of broken internet telephone by people who don't know what they're talking about.
/r/TheRedPill31/12/14 07:39 PM
1

People who don't make mistakes don't make anything at all.
/r/TheRedPill30/12/14 11:06 PM
3

Psychologist here. Short answer: no. Not at all. Silly thing to think. We can fantasize because our forebrains can make things seem real. The REAL benefit of this is future planning and prediction, which gives us the world we live in today. We can attach reward to things that aren't real (future states, say), and can motivate ourselves that way. Sexual fantasy is just us running a little subroutine to trick older brain structures into reacting as though something is actually happening. Any posit…
/r/TheRedPill19/12/14 10:20 PM
1

FYI self-regulatory ability (ie impulse control) can be learned. It's a skill - you're just strengthening your ability to inhibit/control the signals coming forward from the back (reptile part) of your brain. The more you exercise self-control, the easier it becomes. Also, be aware that doing novel things with your SO is good, and is actually a positive version of 'dread game' - we often misattribute physiological arousal to others around us... this is why if you do something exciting with a gir…
/r/TheRedPill03/12/14 03:20 AM
27

Hi guys. I'm a social psychologist and I'm lecturing on attraction / love / close relationships this week, so I'll give you two things that predict fidelity and long-term relationship satisfaction, and remember: this is true for men AND women - I see a lot of "women are this, men are that" thrown around here, when the behavioural psych lit just doesn't really support it. There really are a common set of underlying factors / personality constructs that are expressed differently in men and women d…
/r/TheRedPill02/12/14 01:41 PM
1

For this to work, everyone here should be open to the idea that they are wrong about some things. Most people interpret "I have a slice of pie" as "I have pie, so I know about all pie everywhere" and not "I have a slice of a pie."
/r/TheRedPill21/09/14 01:17 PM
1

No, that doesn't follow logically from what I said. What career gives women status? Where would they go? I don't know. Nowhere, maybe. It's just a pet theory I was discussing with a colleague who does research on that sort of thing.
/r/TheRedPill16/09/14 09:32 PM
1

That's more like it! That was a good read, so I'll jump back in. Here are some bullet points: I never said the top .0001% and etc would not be predominantly male. The higher SD communicates this, and of course I understand that - I work, in part, as a statistician. I was talking about the meaningful consequences of such a difference in the big picture (which is just as important in my line of work). In other words, this: "At age 23 less than 1% of the girls were pursuing doctorates in mathematic…
/r/TheRedPill16/09/14 04:48 PM
1

Talent = genetic predisposition. You're making some assumption that a small difference has absolute value - when it doesn't. Men physically have an absolute advantage over women that can't be denied. it isn't the same in terms of intelligence. You're taking conclusions about undergrads and applying them to everyone, forever. You're also talking about evolution as if it's super smart and optimal, which it isn't - a ~100ms reflex difference may make a small difference over tens of thousands of yea…
/r/TheRedPill16/09/14 03:44 PM
1

And the biggest reason is that there is less female talent to begin with. This is a huge and broad statement with no real backup. You really shouldn't say ridiculous things like that. Someone with huge potential could be born and die without doing anything of consequence. Geniuses could be born and be killed or die early in Africa because of famine, or war, or human trafficking, or anything. And we wouldn't know. Odds are it does happen - and has happened many times - because we all share human …
/r/TheRedPill16/09/14 02:59 PM
1

Ooooh...let's see. Overall, no difference. 5 points - and at a huge amount of data (that would be fairly certain, though probably not meaningful (i.e. it would not mean that men have abilities that women do not). The sample is also very specific - undergrads only - so that limits its generalizability. Higher academia, higher IQ bracket (~110 avg if I recall correctly) - and there would likely be more men of higher IQ here, simply because there are more. Same with homelessness - the lower you get…
/r/TheRedPill16/09/14 01:41 PM
0

Jesus. You fucking guys. Do your homework, eh? Subbed just to make this comment. Read this: http://www.randalolson.com/2014/06/25/average-iq-of-students-by-college-major-and-gender-ratio/ Average IQ does not differ between men and women. At all. Do people with a higher IQ choose to go into math? YES! Do more men than women choose to go into math? YES! So if it isn't because men have higher IQs, what is it...? Could it be...social reasons? Ambition? My own personal theory (as a psychologist) is t…
/r/TheRedPill16/09/14 11:47 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter