TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

CODYsaurusREX Archive

View 7 posts and 195 comments by CODYsaurusREX on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
20

CODYsaurusREX/r/MensRights17/01/14 01:07 AM
14

Post for ModsCODYsaurusREX/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/14 09:47 AM
12

CODYsaurusREX/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/14 12:53 AM
6

CODYsaurusREX/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/14 04:55 PM
6

Post for ModsCODYsaurusREX/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/14 11:42 AM
2

Suggestion ThreadCODYsaurusREX/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/13 11:44 PM
1

CODYsaurusREX/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/14 02:49 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

Oh, punished absolutely. But justice isn't a bunch of sadists getting off on describing on how they'd cruelly and unusually punish this person. I believe in justice and prison system reform, even when I really don't like the crime.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/06/19 11:40 AM
-16

What an ironically barbaric shit opinion.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/06/19 08:30 PM
-15

I think you should be the first one locked up.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/06/19 08:28 PM
-3

Anecdotal and pointlessly divisive observation.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/03/19 10:04 PM
-3

I imagine anyone in a country that doesn't standard equip their traffic enforcers with military grade gear.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/03/19 09:11 PM
4

I love plenty of fucktards. You don't choose family.
/r/MensRights21/03/19 10:05 PM
3

Thermite
/r/PussyPassDenied29/11/18 08:35 PM
0

I mean, that's not really civil discourse, but that's cool. Have a good day.
/r/MensRights01/11/18 11:56 AM
-1

I don't believe in ignoring victims in any instance based off gender. This kind of victim complex is what gives this community a bad rep.
/r/MensRights01/11/18 11:16 AM
-20

The downvotes are unfair. Any suicide by anyone not a cognizant adult exercising their agency in a non depression-reactive way is a tragedy regardless of their genitalia.
/r/MensRights01/11/18 01:09 AM
5

Your phrasing comes across as "it's only men" instead of "it's also men" very very severely.
/r/MensRights27/09/18 11:30 PM
10

Came from a single mother household, still heard the phrase a lot. Anecdotal, but so is yours.
/r/MensRights27/09/18 11:11 PM
6

No. My argument is completely based on human agency in match making. If you don't want to be with someone who is ok with a behavior, don't. You're allowed to do whatever you want. You're not allowed to demand to be viewed or evaluated outside of your actions.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/05/18 03:03 AM
6

If what she did was so ok, why did she have shame? Literally victim blaming.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/05/18 02:15 AM
13

The water is soaking him whilst screaming "you knew better! "
/r/MensRights16/06/15 07:26 AM
2

I'm sure that made sense in your head.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/15 04:44 AM
1

https://www.zocdoc.com/obgyns
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/15 04:15 AM
3

Right, except society has moved past that barbaric notion, pal, and has accepted that gay is as much a state of being as being black.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/15 08:38 PM
5

Ok, so they should be able to refuse to participate in a black wedding?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/15 08:20 PM
6

Hopefully someone can save society by creating sex androids. That'll neutralize sexual power and then we can have real conversations about equality.
/r/MensRights16/05/15 08:19 PM
4

People not involved in government, are being forced to go against their wishes and be involved in something they think is immoral. The industries are floral, cakes, rental halls (which is only a matter of time before a church who owns such a property gets sued). The industries that surround marriage. So should companies who think serving black folk is immoral be allowed to discriminate as well?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/15 08:01 PM
1

You get no gold star because of the their thing you did.
/r/MensRights12/05/15 12:26 PM
2

Lol, it's just a sign of good sarcasm. Difficulty of the medium.
/r/MensRights07/04/15 01:58 AM
2

I don't know if you're being serious or not, but there's some media out there that I personally enjoy that wouldn't exist if the content creator wasn't being compensated.
/r/MensRights07/04/15 01:24 AM
10

I fully acknowledge that violence is rarely the answer, but if someone did that to me, there is a very real chance I'd murder them in a fit of rage.
/r/MensRights05/04/15 04:02 AM
5

And also with mom. I mean, you. Yeah, you.
/r/MensRights29/11/14 03:57 PM
5

Anyone who uses the word faggot as an insult isn't worth debating.
/r/MensRights18/11/14 09:48 PM
1

Well you're allowed to feel that way, but the elected officials in a position of disclosure and authority on the subject saw it as a bigger threat to do nothing. They might have been wrong, but I don't think they were just being warmongers.
/r/MensRights12/11/14 06:46 PM
3

I know, I'm just saying that context is really important when damning historic decisions.
/r/MensRights12/11/14 12:27 PM
1

Yes and no. We could have done nothing, but that would have allowed the Russian-loyal NV to overrun the South, giving Russia a strong influence over the region. Vietnam wasn't about Vietnam, it was a proxy battle in the Cold War.
/r/MensRights12/11/14 03:21 AM
4

Less scarring and potential nerve damage. I think.
/r/MensRights11/11/14 01:07 AM
4

Goddamnit, see this is what I'm talking about. In the last week I've mentioned that. You can look in my comments. And I said I never actually label the law because I always get those two confused. But here I go doing it again.
/r/MensRights07/11/14 10:21 PM
6

I thought so too, but Godwin strikes again. Edit: Poe, not Godwin.
/r/MensRights07/11/14 10:04 PM
2

My opinion may be unpopular here, but I don't think that's so far off base. It says only the woman gets it immediately. I think that makes sense, because really she's the only one guaranteed to be the parent. I think a paternity test is appropriate here, so an actually verifiable claim can be made.
/r/MensRights07/11/14 09:52 PM
11

How about you start taking some accountability? You're directly responsible for the feels your genitalia causes in others.
/r/MensRights01/11/14 03:30 PM
37

I don't think that's a fair statement. I think they hit the nail on the head when they identified as "internet feminists." I believe there are plenty of reasonable feminists, but they're usually off being productive, equal to men members of society, instead of spending all their time online blaming the world for being untalented, or not being worshipped for simply having a pulse and vagina.
/r/MensRights01/11/14 03:29 PM
1

Allowing children to hormonally (sp?) modify their bodies in such a drastic way.
/r/MensRights03/10/14 07:23 PM
1

I mean, don't get my wrong, I may not be able to relate, but I'm not dogging them either. I just don't think that's appropriate for the age group.
/r/MensRights03/10/14 05:59 PM
1

Displaced. But that's not a fair comparison, since that didn't actually happen.
/r/MensRights03/10/14 05:46 PM
2

I guess, if that's how you want to view it. But I'm not terribly "progressive" on that issue, I suppose. I think that personality is dependant on your interaction with the world and that one hundred percent of your interaction is through that body. I don't believe you're born with a predisposition like that. So the notion that you could even exist as you in a body of the opposite sex, much less to have supposed to have been born in it, doesn't really mesh with my paradigm.
/r/MensRights03/10/14 05:10 PM
1

I think you either need to break down the sex divide in sports all together or not at all. I don't believe in exceptions like that, especially over something that seems so inconsequential. You feel like a girl? So? You're still a boy. That means you go on the boy's team.
/r/MensRights03/10/14 05:03 PM
1

No, dress and act how you want. But I don't think the school should allow people to play on teams for the opposite sex, and I definitely don't believe in encouraging hormone therapy in minors for the purposes of competitive equality and gender transformation.
/r/MensRights03/10/14 04:53 PM
3

Any reasonable investigating officer would infer the proper meaning from the texts.
/r/MensRights03/10/14 04:25 PM
-4

Maybe I'm missing the point, but I don't really think people under eighteen should be allowed to be trans. I think that's a bigger decision than smoking cigarettes or gambling.
/r/MensRights03/10/14 04:23 PM
0

I like you.
/r/MensRights19/09/14 11:56 AM
1

The beauty of the Purge is that it doesn't have to have anything to do with if.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/14 01:44 AM
1

I'd say that's a rather opinionated interpretation. Regardless, paperwork that says "I just used this guy's semen to impregnate myself and release him from all financial obligation" should stand up in court, no matter the ideological beliefs of the person sharing the story.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/14 01:24 AM
1

The OP can't just redefine laws and legal terms just because reality doesn't match up with his ideology. That's just absurd. Let me start by saying that on a pragmatic level, I agree with you. However, I don't interpret this post to be a "Look at the government disobeying the law" type post; rather I view it as a "Look how stupid the law is" type post.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/14 12:47 AM
1

Shh, me. They're on to us!
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/14 11:23 PM
2

The conflict is in the inference; every time a RP mod removed a BP post it would be "biased." And the same for BP mods removing RP posts.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/14 11:58 PM
2

Because we're here to facilitate discussion, not promote an agenda. The people of those two subreddits have a community that they can relatively safely assume agrees with them. No matter what we say, at least half of the community will disagree. The purpose of this subreddit is incredibly different than those two.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/14 11:31 PM
1

I can see why you'd avoid mentioning this, as the moderator of a sub you should be forthright and commenting using alts is far from it. I'd like to make one thing very clear: you are not entitled to know our opinions. That is simply a right you do not have. I do not owe you transparency of thought. We do not owe you our beliefs. If you think we owe you that, you're wrong. Nonnegotiable.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/14 11:20 PM
2

You know, we avoid saying it, but apart from ROFL, we all have alternate accounts which we comment with. We don't tell the other mods which ones are us; we try to avoid special treatment. Participating with our main accounts is unwise. We would be accused of favoring our own views, and would be called out for not acting neutrally. We're not even opposed to more moderators, although we're not actively seeking them. It's just that finding levelheaded individuals who we don't expect to act out is i…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/14 07:34 PM
2

That becomes a popularity contest. People who are popular with a majority are not necessarily going to be good mods. That's especially true in a subreddit that is literally based off ideological conflict.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/14 03:57 PM
1

Uhuh, sure. And who did you have in mind to replace me? Maybe... you?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/14 03:14 PM
1

So, right up your alley then?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/14 11:45 AM
3

It's a bunch of people arguing online. I think maybe you should re-evaluate yourself if you really think it's that important.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/14 11:35 AM
2

If you find a guy creepy listen to your fear, listen good. I think if you feel fear around any person you should listen to it.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/14 08:30 PM
1

When I get on my computer I'll tweak it.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/14 07:43 PM
1

I may not be from TRP but I'm more red than blue. If I'm doing it right, no one would know.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/14 07:42 PM
1

Haha glad to hear it.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/14 03:36 PM
4

To answer your question, BP posts are usually better received. However, the point I was trying to convey is that we're accused of moderating with a bias that favors RP.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/14 03:34 PM
1

Look at the stickied post.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/14 02:58 PM
1

Yeah, edited. Thanks.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/14 09:46 AM
1

Thanks! I'll be sure to give it a look.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/14 02:25 AM
1

I just meant personally.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/14 02:25 AM
1

Hmm. Give me a little bit, and I'll work on something better in one of my test subs.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/14 02:13 AM
1

You know, I'm in the minority, but I enjoyed it.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/14 02:07 AM
1

Do you mean the moderator box? Some sidebar aspects look different as I'm a moderator. Would you mind screenshotting?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/14 02:07 AM
3

No, like the movie.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/14 01:41 AM
9

Funny, we get suggestions to name it "red pill 2" as well. Regardless, the community will march to the beat of its own drum starting Saturday.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/14 01:27 AM
1

But y'know red pillers would never think of something like that because it requires seeing women's behavior as sometimes about something other than wanting money or wanting the D. Leaving the comment, but please try to be less antagonistic in the future :/ At least until Saturday.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/14 01:14 AM
1

Thanks! I'm a fan of the more "minimalist" approach. I've been teaching myself. The old one, while better than the default, was... "clunky" at best.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/14 12:58 AM
1

It's a cross-section.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 11:08 PM
3

Here's a nice 6.00'x6.00' room for you to rethink in.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 08:01 PM
1

That's not something we can do through CSS. Although it does sound like it would curb the trend.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/14 12:56 PM
2

Ok, I understand- this is a the "Patriarchy is Evil", capital E talks. I sincerely wish you a good day, but I'm going to be stepping out of this conversation.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/14 10:29 PM
5

No. Women are not a minority, they are a half. Calling someone a nigger is more offensive than calling someone a honky because the word nigger has a connotation of oppression and degradation that honky doesn't have. That's unarguably a matter of interpretation. Stating that the way you interpret the words is the only correct way is over-confident.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/14 08:49 PM
1

Cunt has a stronger connotation than dick to many English speakers, and it's considered the most offensive word in the English language to some. Your preconceptions on the English language and how offended you should be whilst being cursed at in any form are neither our responsibility nor our concern. Would you tell black people arguing about race relations not to be niggers and then think that's equally as offensive as telling the white people they're arguing with not to be honkies? Well, yeah.…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/14 07:35 PM
31

I should also probably not tell people that leaving the keys in the ignition of their unlocked car, either. I'm a theft-apologist apparently.
/r/MensRights06/03/14 01:54 AM
1

It's kind of a niche place. If I may ask, where did you hear about here from?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/14 10:54 PM
1

30 seconds quicker than me.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/14 04:43 AM
2

No.
/r/MensRights07/02/14 09:03 PM
8

With a comment section, yes.
/r/MensRights07/02/14 09:03 PM
2

So if she sticks a finger up my butt, I was raped, right?
/r/MensRights20/01/14 04:17 PM
1

I already told Soulcakeduck to do that, yesterday. Before this whole debacle. http://i.imgur.com/74ZMfC9.png
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/14 07:47 PM
0

I don't know how much clearer I can make this. In the screencap, it shows that I told you only three submission were removed. You claim that all 14 were removed. You were wrong, and you had previous knowledge of that, which the timestamp on the picture shows.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/14 07:45 PM
1

Actually, this was made perfectly clear to you in modmail. http://i.imgur.com/74ZMfC9.png
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/14 05:22 PM
2

*Condescension.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/14 01:38 AM
1

I'm not talking about the children, or child support. I'm talking about alimony, or money particularly for the woman. Admittedly, I definitely should have made that clear.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/14 03:27 AM
2

I dont believe men and women are equal and I think when a man keeps a woman for a long period of time, she becomes used to his support. Kind of like releasing an animal from captivity into the wild We're just going to have to agree to disagree then. Our views are going to be irreconcilable.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/14 12:07 AM
-2

I certainly wouldn't hang around. Yet every day you come here to debate it, proving that you do, in fact, hang around.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/14 12:01 AM
0

So you've never had a desire to see someone dead?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/14 12:00 AM
2

No, that's Tumblr.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/14 11:59 PM
0

That implies that she's less capable of sustaining herself as an adult than a male. Not only that she's less capable, but that the man is so much more capable that he can not only live on his own, but support her too. That directly means that women are less capable of living in our society than men, and therefore are not equal.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/14 11:56 PM
11

You realize that men have their rights infringed upon by entities other than women, right? The sub isn't just for unfair relations with women, it's about any concern that effects men, and their rights.
/r/MensRights10/01/14 08:40 PM
1

Oh my god! Isn't it embarrassing after a while? At some point all fantasies become embarrassing. and It's so fucking indulgent to a ridiculous degree. Ignore reality for fantasy. Fantasy fantasy fantasy! are both very bitter statements. That's not concern, that's condescension.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/14 04:28 AM
3

Ah, missed the solicitation. My mistake.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/14 04:20 AM
1

Besides, TRP has mocked dead rape victims before, so there's that. Does that really matter to the point being discussed? That's a red herring.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/14 04:13 AM
3

I suppose since she's living her life a way she wants to, it is reality for her. It seems to me like it's a fantasy for you, a reality for her, and you're rather bitter about that.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/14 04:04 AM
6

It is singularly impossible to take a stance on gender relations that won't piss at least a third of your audience off to no end.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/14 01:26 PM
5

I agree with the sentiment. Honestly, I even think that your statements are probably accurate. But you hung your authority on a study that you can't furnish. I'm not trying to be an ass. I think your claim would have been just as effective and half as arguable if you had just said "In my experience."
/r/MensRights04/01/14 06:08 AM
3

This is what most people call "backpedaling."
/r/MensRights04/01/14 05:57 AM
1

While I acknowledge that it is unfortunately unfair in many cases, I think that having a functioning system comes before having a fair system. Also, while there may be trends that correlate to race or familial wealth, that is by no means binding. It doesn't matter what color you are, or how wealthy; if you do well enough in school, there are scholarships. And the fact remains, that people who are educated are more likely to vote responsibly. It doesn't matter how wealthy or what race, they're go…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/14 06:14 PM
1

I just realized that it was a response comment. My bad, I thought I posted it as its own thread. Sorry about that.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/14 05:38 PM
1

Actually, a personal attack is about you. As a person. If I supplied a negative adjective, such as stupid, moronic, fat, idiotic, or insane, then yes, I would be "attacking" you, as a person. However, my issue, as stated, isn't with you. It's with your action- the action of stereotyping, specifically. It's neither baseless, nor a personal attack, and I won't be removing it. I'm allowed to disagree with your methodology, just as you are allowed to disagree with mine. I'm not claiming that TRP is …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/14 04:41 AM
0

Nope. That wasn't my point. Nor am I in line to stage any form of coupe. As I said in my post, I wanted only to address some issues I took with your original statement. First, the idea of being anti-democratic, which is irrelevant since we aren't a democracy. For all the statement "anti-democratic" is worth in relations to the way the US government is run, you might as well say "anti-fascist." It doesn't matter, since we're neither. And second, you say who would celebrate secession or other esca…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/14 04:23 AM
2

It's like using a checkbook to balance the accounts of a Fortune 500 company. There's nothing wrong with a checkbook, or direct democracy. But there's a certain "mass" when neither is effective at doing their jobs anymore.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/14 03:42 AM
0

http://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/1u6p9r/will_the_redpill_revolution_be_violent/cef71fi I think that would appeal to you.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/14 03:16 AM
0

I have three counter-points to that, assuming the discussion is about the USA. I'd like to be very clear that I'm not saying that women shouldn't be allowed to vote, or whatnot. Not by any means. But I do note some discrepancies in this whole post. And boy, is my post long. .1. We are not a democracy. We're a republic. It's even in our Pledge of Allegiance. We have Congress because the masses have been deemed incapable of making the big decisions on their own. We have "the great suggestion box,"…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/14 03:11 AM
2

I'll do my damndest.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/13 04:56 AM
1

I can look into it. However, I must admit I'm not really educated in the finer points of CSS. I've self-taught everything, and I haven't had to do anything for RES yet. So I'll be happy to give it a crack, after all, it's just another opportunity to learn. But I don't know how quick I'll be on it, truthfully. Would you mind describing the issues so I have a ball-park idea of what I need to focus on?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/13 04:20 AM
1

And, thus proving you came here to rage, not to debate. Why are you even here?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/13 12:54 AM
6

No self-actualized person would be so miserable over not having sex that they'd feel the need to identify as involuntarily celibate. Are you serious? The term means someone who isn't having sex who wants to. If the person wants to have sex, and isn't, then it doesn't matter whether they identify as such or not, the definition of the term is accurate. You're intentionally misconstruing the definition of the term. You're viewing this as a choice, or orientation. It's just a situation. There are pl…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/13 12:53 AM
3

Please stay on topic here. The point in this subreddit is to share and debate ideas in a serious and respectful manner. Please refrain from mockery, and contribute to the actual discussion.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/13 05:38 PM
1

Oh, ok. Thanks!
/r/MensRights20/12/13 04:43 AM
2

But refusing to work outside of your contract isn't the same as being lesser qualified.
/r/MensRights20/12/13 03:40 AM
5

What is SJW?
/r/MensRights20/12/13 03:38 AM
2

I really can't make changes like that, although I'll bring it up with the other mods. I'm really looking to see if there was any visual or aesthetic changes people would like to see implemented.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/13 01:47 AM
2

Well, downvoting is actually removed as an option. That is just meant to prevent bandwagoning a highly rated comment.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/13 01:41 AM
2

And, also, no. One of the other mods must have made it blue for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/13 07:42 PM
2

Please don't assign motives to my actions. I do everything for aesthetic reasons, not for a particular cause.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/13 07:04 PM
2

Added. Thanks, I wasn't really sure what that code was for when I was in your stylesheet. Nifty, I'll have to add it to some other subs too. Thanks!
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/13 03:44 PM
2

Also added background image.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/13 03:19 PM
1

Thanks! This is just the beginning, with more to come.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/13 11:33 AM
2

I'm open for suggestions. Link me to a more appealing color, and we may implement it. Nothing is permanent!
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/13 11:32 AM
2

I just tweaked the person/ user on counter on the right. What do you think of the new look?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/13 01:59 AM
2

Well, I look forward to giving it a go. I'm thinking that step one will be a new header image. And step two will be to replace the background with something light purple. And step three will be a new set of arrows for the sub. What do you think?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/13 01:46 AM
2

Yeah I didn't have one at the moment, and all of a sudden I did. I shrunk the boxes a little on green and red, to make them match blue and purple.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/13 01:35 AM
2

I literally just changed it, so I don't know if that was about the previous one or this one. Someone gave it to me haha.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/13 01:30 AM
5

I look forward to helping in every way I can! Everyone, I'm more here as a code mechanic than an administrator. Don't worry, I'm not ushering in any authoritarian age.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/13 01:23 AM
2

No problem! You've got it all in order now.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/13 12:14 AM
2

Actually, you added Amused Modstery for everyone, as green. Go to reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/about/flair Then go to user templates, at the bottom. For the bottom one, the one that says amused modstery, delete the text, then delete the class, so it's blank. Click the "User can change" button, so it's enabled. Hit save. Out of the flair menu (where you add it to your name), choose the bottom one, which will now be blank, and type in what you want to show. Go to grant flair. Find your name and f…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/13 12:02 AM
2

My pleasure!
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/13 11:40 PM
5

I came up with some CSS script that might improve the flair a little. If you want to see it in action, you can at /r/OnceCamelot, one of my subs for testing script. If you like it, the script is below. Just put "redpill," "bluepill," and "purplepill" as the CSS class in the flair section (from the mod menu) and it will give you the options. If you don't want to look at the subreddit, then HERE is an image showing the result. .flair-redpill{ color: white; background: red; border-color: white; bor…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/13 08:48 PM
1

Thanks, that was helpful. Interesting practice.
/r/MensRights18/12/13 05:24 PM
1

That's rather unfair. How do they get in? Appointments?
/r/MensRights18/12/13 05:15 PM
1

Is that like congress for the rich?
/r/MensRights18/12/13 05:05 PM
1

Huh. If that's the case, then I was misinformed. Apologies. I still think that a Royal Family is antiquated though.
/r/MensRights18/12/13 04:49 PM
1

I'm not saying we're perfect. We're not even a democracy, really. But at least we get a new president every 4-8 years. We don't pay someone for the privilege of having had control over the country sometime back in their lineage.
/r/MensRights18/12/13 04:42 PM
6

The kind that still has a monarchy.
/r/MensRights17/12/13 03:41 PM
2

"Fake it till you make it," eh?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/13 08:46 PM
4

Just a counter point- in the article, it is clearly stated that wolves do in fact act on the Alpha/Beta observations, while in captivity. The refutation comes from the fact that wolves shed that behavior when in the wild. That's all well and good. However, in the human parallel, are we not in captivity? Our lives are determined, in a large way, by forces beyond our control. Economic factors, family history, laws and regulation, etc. And, with no exception, we all must report to someone (assuming…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/13 02:53 AM
1

Great! Now, since I've bought earned your loyalty, I appoint you to a council member on the B.O.T.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/13 02:37 AM
2

Well, you're half right at least. Come on, I'm not a bad king. A very benevolent dictator. How can you be mad at me?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/13 08:53 PM
3

To the dinotine with you! (It's like a guillotine but for dinosaurs)
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/13 03:13 PM
3

You skipped the part of my name that means "King." What, do you think I'm some kinda pleb dinosaur or something?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/13 02:12 PM
3

Goddamn, if you're going to include me, at least include the "-rex" part. Elsewhise, you are now NWO.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/13 02:54 AM
2

Fair enough. Thanks for being reasonable!
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/13 12:10 AM
2

Erm. Ok. Anytime we give up the ability to make (and, inherently, responsibility for) our actions, we lose a little bit more of our independence. If the situation above is made "criminal," whether in a court of law, or only at a specific campus, then "Amanda" has lost the ability to make her own decisions, and deal with the consequences of them. If taking away "agency" (and simultaneously, accountability) then we're doomed.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/13 12:05 AM
4

It's not about one person. It's about the future of our culture and society. If we allow establishments to decide whether or not we mean what we say, then that will come back to haunt us. Particularly in the US, being as it's a Suggestive Republic.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/13 10:36 PM
3

Any time you take away freedom and agency, the loss will always outweigh the gains. If not now, then tomorrow.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/13 08:45 PM
3

So, it's sexual harassment because he asked for sex, in a private intimate situation? EDIT: How do I have downvotes? To me, there isn't even an option to do so.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/13 08:44 PM
21

#MissedOpportunities
/r/MensRights09/12/13 06:22 PM
0

I'm not contesting that. What I'm saying is, this act isn't "rape" when he does it. If she wakes up and liked it, then it was just sex. If she wakes up and says "I was down to bone, but once I fell asleep you should have stopped" he's suddenly a felon. So, until that response from her, what he did was like a Shrodinger's Fuck, simultaneously rape and consensual, and that seems grey as shit to me. But seriously, if you read the rest of my comments on here, I understand where you're position is co…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/13 09:36 PM
2

All I'm saying is that a crime should be clearly definable, and one should know that they are actually committing it.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/13 09:15 PM
3

I see your point. I apologize.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/13 03:12 PM
1

That wasn't the situation though, if you read the post. They were in the process of having sex, consensually, when she passed out. It's not like he found someone drunk on a sofa. She had already agreed to sex, in that setting, at that time. Like I said, douchey yes, rape no. In the situation you described, having sex with a passed out stranger, it would be rape. No question about it. But being in the act of sex when the state of mind changes doesn't automatically change the consent. He was opera…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/13 02:45 PM
2

Any differentiation from the agreed action (in this case, nonviolent, vaginal sex) would be done without consent, therefore qualifying it as rape.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/13 02:35 PM
1

So in this case, it's rape retroactively? The act may be rape then? A crime that occurs due to a attitude afterwards isn't fair. So, assuming she liked it, it wasn't rape, according to your definition?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/13 02:18 PM
2

I'm not saying it's right, but I think that throwing around the word rape is kinda rash, given they were in the act of consensual sex when it happened. It's different if you happen across a passed out girl and have sex. That's rape. But this was during sex. It seems different.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/13 02:15 PM
1

There's no such thing as Shrodingers rape, where it's simultaneously consensual and rape at the same time. That's what you're describing.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/13 11:47 AM
3

What does his ability have to do with whether this is rape?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/13 05:01 AM
-2

No. Absolutely not. She can't say "I changed my mind once I passed" and alakazam it's rape. If she agreed before, while he should have stopped for decencies sake, it isn't rape. Rape is really a legal word, not a moral one. It's douchey, but not rape. Rape is ignoring the lack of consent, or moving past a no. Not this scenario.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/13 05:00 AM
1

I think this was in reference to the slut walks.
/r/MensRights02/12/13 12:36 AM
37

I have had a problem with this for a while. My argument has always been that if an action, when successful, is called romantic, then it is unfair to retroactively call the action creepy when it fails. For instance: Steve likes Jill. Jill likes Steve. Ted also likes Jill. Jill does not really like Ted. Steve sends flowers to Jill anonymously. Ted, who is in the break room, hears firsthand how well she liked them. Ted goes home and places an even bigger order of roses, delivered the next day. Jill…
/r/MensRights02/12/13 12:30 AM
0

I meant as for the OP. I don't do LTRs, so I have no need for the information beyond discussion.
/r/TheRedPill30/11/13 04:49 AM
1

Exactly. I guess there's not enough information for a 100% accurate response.
/r/TheRedPill29/11/13 10:59 PM
1

I mean that cheating on a spouse can have financial repercussions as well. And even if it's just a few states, I'm still right.
/r/TheRedPill28/11/13 07:26 PM
1

Adultery is a crime too, alimony can come from that as well.
/r/TheRedPill28/11/13 07:19 PM
2

It's justification to end the marriage, I agree. But is it really justification to go back on your word? At the end of the day, a liar is a liar.
/r/TheRedPill28/11/13 01:37 AM
10

Not really. It's grounds to end the marriage, IMO, but not to cheat. There's a balance- putting out and not cheating aren't equal agreements.
/r/TheRedPill28/11/13 01:33 AM
1

I don't think that's true. You do realize some women are self-sufficient, right?
/r/TheRedPill17/11/13 01:35 AM
2

I doubt she wants one. Not getting married is a pretty common idea.
/r/TheRedPill15/11/13 06:54 PM
1

What are you buzzing on about?
/r/TheRedPill13/11/13 02:20 PM
2

Would a "/s" help?
/r/MensRights26/09/13 09:59 PM
2

Right, but our statistics matter more. EDIT: "/s"
/r/MensRights26/09/13 09:18 PM
4

Someone should set a rendezvous site in case of eviction. Just tactically speaking.
/r/TheRedPill10/09/13 10:57 PM
4

Mans laughter only takes one guy and one joke, dipshit.
/r/TheRedPill10/09/13 08:44 PM
6

Those weren't midgets in the ballgags.
/r/MensRights10/09/13 08:41 PM
6

Here. Sexual is part of the definition. If they paid for a Dominatrix' service and did not receive sexual interaction, then there was a faulty agreement.
/r/MensRights10/09/13 08:39 PM
3

I don't disagree with 90% of what she's saying, but I can't fathom the purpose. Does she want men to stop complimenting women? I get that it's her prerogative, but only for herself. I know some women in my own life that admit compliments are appreciated. I don't get what the goal is here.
/r/MensRights16/08/13 09:11 PM
2

Hope restored. Civility isn't dead :)
/r/MensRights12/08/13 12:54 AM
1

Fair enough. Would it be better to refer to it as "ambiguous sexual transgression?"
/r/MensRights12/08/13 12:35 AM
2

How is this on me? I'd rather understate then overstate.
/r/MensRights12/08/13 12:25 AM
2

Consider it an illustrative dichotomy.
/r/MensRights12/08/13 12:14 AM
2

(Thank you.)
/r/MensRights11/08/13 11:46 PM
2

Force has to do with level of consent, IMHO. Pushing a 4 year old down and fondling, vs. "I'll show you mine if you show me yours" can both technically be called rape. I think that using a hotword out of the gate such as rape ruins the chance for intelligent conversation by instigating a "Ready, fire, aim" reaction.
/r/MensRights11/08/13 11:40 PM
3

Now racial slurs? Sure you do, and so do I. My opinion? You should leave the page. You are experiencing what is commonly known as hypocrisy.
/r/MensRights11/08/13 11:37 PM
1

Just leave the page please. EDIT: That was rude, agreed. I strongly disagree with your sentiments.
/r/MensRights11/08/13 10:10 PM
3

Unless it's forceful, I think this whole conversation would be better if we replaced the word "rape" with "molest."
/r/MensRights11/08/13 10:09 PM
2

No, she can't be watched all the time. Children playing in their yards unattended is normal.
/r/MensRights11/08/13 10:05 PM
0

Mandatory war. Mandatory war. Don't be retarded. No, everyone is told to drink responsibly. That's why it's ok to wear Speedos and pony tails in public without being harrassed, right? do you see where I am going with this
/r/MensRights12/11/12 02:56 AM
18

I'm currently dealing with a false accusation right now, and can state with 100% certainty that the claim of forced oral is a form of sexual assault. But, rape is a colloquialism. There aren't really charges of rape- it's called that, but written down as sexual assault.
/r/MensRights05/11/12 02:51 AM
21

Carefully.
/r/MensRights05/11/12 02:48 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter