TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

CarHungry Archive

View 0 posts and 519 comments by CarHungry on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
6

Instead of running with the obvious here and saying "if men aren't entitled to sex under any circumstances then women aren't entitled to marriage/commitment etc" I will just say that relationships are typically a dynamic thing, you can't possibly know what you'd want to do 10-20 years in the future with someone you just met. I straight up told my partner I didn't want kids when we met and that changed later on and we did eventually agree to have atleast one a few years later when I knew her bett…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/26 07:04 PM
1

It happens more often, but that doesn't mean its the "norm", most studies still show divorce increases dramatically if the woman even gets a promotion at work, much less the man decides to quit his job. I personally don't know any stay at home dads and my ex was obviously unhappy when I was just inbetween jobs for awhile, and we didn't even live together.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 07:12 AM
1

This. If the ai is higher quality then the average poster I'm all for it, Its not like ai is capable of saying anything remotely offensive anyway so dunno why people are so obsessed with banning it
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/26 06:08 PM
1

This person's flair is purple and this doesn't look like redpill, more like wishful thinking on his part. You don't need to buy a woman food to have sex, but telling her you're not going to pay is weird self-sabotage advice
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/26 06:01 PM
5

"single women are happier than single men" People keep repeating this but I've never seen anyone prove it, statistically much more young women are in relationships than young men, single women take way more antidepressants etc. I think most women would actually cope with abject loneliness worse, they just aren't typically subjected to the kind of loneliness men are. Women have a higher burden from sex due to pregnancy, yet birth control and abortion access obviously didn't make anything easier f…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/26 11:59 PM
1

I'd argue confidence isn't directly attractive to women, because it doesn't line up with how most people meet up (through friends rather than as strangers on the street) I think a lack of confidence can hurt you because you could miss opportunities, but there's a very hard ceiling to what confidence alone can do for you in dating.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/26 11:35 PM
1

Pure projection. One of my ex's used to randomly bring me mcdonalds and bbq plates and I thought that was lit af (the sex wasn't bad either)
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/26 11:10 AM
1

It also immediately becomes a ship of theseus problem, especially when you start swapping sexuality around, at that point you're not even really the same person anymore which defeats the entire point of the hypothetical. Which I'm not sure it really had a point to begin with.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/26 11:55 PM
2

Lmao why do they keep asking this is it like a weird fetish thing? I feel like I see this gender swap roleplay discussion about once a week
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/26 11:50 PM
1

Men gave women every kind of "equality" and then some, and women are more bitter and miserable (or atleast more vocal about it) by every metric than they ever have been in history, the irony would be hilarious if it weren't so tragic.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/26 01:06 AM
2

Ironic considering every response you've had in this thread either sounds like responses from a woman, or a man who's never had sex in his entire life. Most bluepillers talk like aliens that don't understand humans so I'm sure you do fit in however.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/26 05:40 AM
1

It would have been controversial if you added that it's most likely caused by porn. No body on the internet will admit it because p much all dudes who use it are addicted af
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/26 05:28 AM
6

Saying OP's silly caricature is a representation of rp is like saying the green haired terf who screams about their right to sever their newborns spine and leave it in a dumpster is an adequate representation of feminism. Married rp just sounds like guys trying to cope with their mistakes to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/26 05:48 PM
1

I think you just have to look at how most people typically meet their partners to figure out what they generally find attractive (spoiler it's through friends). The average man will have sex with the average woman without even knowing her name. So then why are mutual friends a necessity? Because women need to know what other people think of you, in a sense its a popularity contest and has nothing to do with morality. Most women just want to make their friends envious. Now you could say its to "v…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/26 07:05 PM
0

I feel like every other post on this sub is [insert crazy strawman here], maybe we could get a strawman flair? Just a thought.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/26 05:15 PM
0

Statistically no one meets through dating apps and speed dating though, they meet through friends (real life) and social media (online). When people say they "met online" they mean like instagram not tinder.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/26 01:03 AM
6

Men dominate the vast majority of workplace deaths, homicides, police brutality, suicides, drug ods and just die younger and more in general from everything. I don't think it really justifies "doing" anything to women or even that "misandry" fully explains it, but it does show how many lefties/libs do view it as a zero sum game, since they can't even really acknowledge it on its own. Personally, I align more with the left than the right, but I dislike the idea of oppression dichotomies based on …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/26 12:01 AM
1

Marriage is just slavery for women, lets abolish it already, what say you feminists?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/26 08:40 PM
2

As a single dad I would feel worse about potentially contributing to a broken home dynamic, but the real downside here is just the fact children are huge investments and they fundementally change the way a relationship functions. I probably wouldn't even consider dating single moms if I wasn't already a parent.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/26 05:38 PM
–

There's lots of examples of men not doing the things OP is complaining about, and they get friendzoned, ghosted, or cheated on themselves, and then what happens when you talk about your not so uncommon experience online? People like OP turn the blame on you anyway. Now why take advice from someone who obviously can't relate to your experiences and doesn't care in the slightest? This is why I try to avoid giving women advice for the same reason. Men and women simply have differing goals alot of t…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/26 04:59 PM
3

Yeah, this advice would also be good if women paid for all the first dates, did all the approaching, and generally took all the intial risks. Women do this strategy more because they are pretty much always on the receiving end early on.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/26 12:31 PM
–

Same, I'm just a normal ass dude and I've had girls literally get mad at me for not making a move by the first week of dating
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/26 11:22 AM
-4

Most people couldn't even read or write a few centuries ago, you are conflating something that was true for everyone as if it were only true for women. The concept of "rights" are also an extremely recent invention in human history, men's suffrage literally came right before women's, and as far as I know women got their rights without fighting in a single war.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/26 10:49 AM
1

People keep pushing the "women were powerless and had no choice until a few decades ago" narrative, but logically it doesn't follow, like how could prostitution be the "oldest profession" if men could just take sex for free or via coercion? Because they couldn't. Why give women rights if men were free to oppress women to their hearts content? Why would a slave owner willingly give slaves a vote? You simply lack common sense to believe any of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/26 05:37 AM
1

The "looksmaxx" narrative has almost nothing to do with RP. Men obviously evolved to be less beautiful than women, and would be even uglier due to fighting the environment and other men, also studies show men do better as they age and men do in fact get uglier. If men just had to wear makeup to get constant dates like women you couldn't even call it a redpill, because that is much easier and less risky than reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/26 12:24 AM
2

I'd mostly agree, but with the caveat that women generally don't take many risks intially if they can help it, so being willing to make the first move (especially sexually which is why many guys get friendzoned) helps. Approaching randomly however is risky, because when people are unsure they copy one another, so if someone sees you being rejected they will be more likely to also reject you due to social proof, de facto lowering your social status retroactively. So its a risk/reward kind of thin…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/26 01:58 AM
3

Bro, most women don't want "power" they want "fun", if they wanted power they would just date spineless simps, but then those guys would have the self esteem to not be spineless simps in the first place. People here don't represent any sort of norm, especially the women, because of the rarity of them on niche internet spaces, outliers can be safely ignored in most situations.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/26 12:29 AM
1

The idea of a woman taking some random incel on the internets advice is really really funny to me, so I'm going to choose to believe you actually did that, 100%.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/26 05:17 AM
2

This is very geographic specific. Being more antisocial is mostly a result of men being forced to compete for everything. Risk taking becomes more necessary as resources become more scarce (which is why many women select for it probly) or as inequlity widens, which is why you'll see less antisocial behavior in general in countries with better saftey nets. You can't really negotiate with "sympathy" as a hostage, because it never belonged to men as a group anyways afaik
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 06:05 AM
1

Contrary to popular belief it is actually extremely easy to not cheat on your partner You just don't do it, it's literally that easy
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/26 06:59 AM
1

I see what you did there, but naw destiny is redpill-adjacent, he just doesn't practice what he preaches. Actually he cheated on both his baby mama and his ex-wife (by her admission) so maybe he's just more of a sociopath.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/26 02:39 AM
1

Anecdotes neither prove or disprove the rp, but I got ghosted and cheated on pretty consistently up until using some of the advice I saw on the other now banned subreddit. Personally I greatly dislike that the rp worked for me, but I simply default to a gentler more boring guy, it would literally be better for me if rp was all made up bullshit.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/26 09:39 PM
1

The things you mentioned were the "solution" unfortunately, just about every mammalian species I'm aware of has an arms race of sorts between sexes. Also people constantly trying to reify rp bugs the hell out of me, its a concept or explanation not a physical object or establishment, "blaming" it that way doesn't make sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/26 09:02 AM
–

Yeah, that's where redpilled advice kind of falters ultimately, they can point you in the direction of the type of "masculine" women find attractive, but then if you aren't like that naturally you will be faking it for the rest of the relationship, and I know most women are way way better at faking it than I am lmao.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/26 08:33 PM
3

I can only speak for myself when I say being kind of an asshole definitely made me more successful, like I just know I wouldn't have gotten certain things out of my relationships if I wasn't more aggressive or deceitful. However no one strategy is full proof, that's your flawed thinking. You can only really hedge your bets and hope to get lucky at the end of the day.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/26 03:11 AM
1

Just because something is riskier doesn't necessarily mean it is less beneficial. Both men and women climb the heirarchy when they engage in sex, for women it depends more on who they have sex with rather than the amount. Women can also gain financially from sex in ways most men simply cannot.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/26 11:08 PM
1

This. Sets a bad precedent and it gives other dudes an opportunity to swoop in if you aren't sealing, women these days move fast as hell. They know if they want to bang you pretty fast, and you lose the "mysterious" factor if they get to know you too much anyway. Plus "sniping" from the friendzone is just plain cowardly and pathetic.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/25 07:52 PM
1

I mean sometimes jerking off feels better than sex, and I'd never ever guilt trip a partner over it, but I don't think it's unreasonable to want good sex either. I mean sometimes I just want some affection and the orgasm isn't as important, so it is sort of mood dependant. One time I was so horny that I was eating an ex out in the shower and the water went off her ass into my face and felt like I was getting water boarded the whole time. Never even got so much as a high five after lmao.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/25 09:33 PM
0

Traditionally sex with low status men dehumanizes women, but in turn it humanizes those men. This only makes sense if women are humanized by default and lower class men are not.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/25 07:04 PM
2

I dislike echochambers, but I also dislike all the hate. I think men and women should just have sex honestly. I don't think my mind can really be changed on that tbh.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/25 03:13 AM
–

The vast majority of women have a social mechanism for evaluating potential partners, you'd probably have to be pretty far above average to have much success without the social component, or you'd be coasting on outliers. The easiest way I've done it is getting on social media and gaining some local influence, followers, attention etc. I've had women contact me first when I used to make posts that get lots of likes (some even being very aggressive) also you want to have pictures that look attrac…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/25 12:21 AM
1

Not every guy can sustain being a bad guy, even if it works. It's easier for me to just lower my expectations and reward behavior I want more of, rather than fuck it up down the road when my beta nice guy traits begins to manifest subconsciously. I also I think patrice o'neal gave some good advice on O&A "always fuck a chick like its the last time you'll ever see her again", because it always could be.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/25 10:12 PM
0

You can, and you can have sex with women you are friends with also. If you mean strictly nonsexual, I just don't see the point in it. I'm more of a results kind of guy tbh, and admittedly pessimistic, I don't understand why women make such a big deal out of these "friendships" unless they are in fact the beneficiaries of them. Which is fine it just isn't for me, but neither is commitment, I just simply cannot see living my life any other way at this point. I'm too old to wish on a twinkling star…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/25 12:02 AM
1

So the women sacrifice everything for a fraction of one man who won't fully commit to them because he has other options? I don't know that I agree. I think women probably benefit more from a setup where they have several "platonic" bfs or reserve partners, and one husband they have sex with because then they get all of these men's resources and commitment with the most minimal investment. That's basically what we have in the west, plus 1% men who are secret polygamists, or blatant cheaters I gue…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/25 04:31 PM
1

I don't think this question makes sense. If I woke up tomorrow with female anatomy, I'd still be attracted to women. However if you look at gay men's relationships there's less abuse and divorce statistically. I think if the roles were totally reversed to the point where men had an upper hand sexually, I think that men would just gravitate to hotter (and maybe dumber) women, not necessarily abusive or violent, as that's stereotypically a masculine trait.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/25 12:13 PM
1

People who prescribe cold approach do not do that shit regularly. It's just like people who unironically say "touch grass", homeless people touch grass every minute of the day and many of them are fucking insane lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/25 05:50 AM
1

Statistically I believe some men DO go for men when women aren't available. I think they call it prison gay? But yeah, it's a disingenuous argument and a waste of time as an analogy.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/25 05:13 PM
1

That's not a very good survey imo, one of the authors of that study even states that the methodology was probably flawed due to the interviewer using his own personal judgment to rate everyone. So the biases of a single dude determines the outcome of the entire study, cool. I won't say looks don't matter at all, but if you look at things like [first time fathers] (https://fathercraft.com/average-age-first-time-fathers) show men are having children older, when they are getting generally uglier, a…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/25 03:25 AM
1

Same here bro, one of my ex's tried to tell me I "used her for sex" yet continued consistently having sex with me for 7 years lmao. Before that I was a pretty stereotypical "nice guy" and never could get a relationship to last more than a month or 2. To some women being "boring" is worse than being a violent drunk, and trust me I knew some violent drunks who absolutely slayed, with just about every type of woman too. I still try to avoid assuming literally all women are like that, but the data u…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/25 09:24 AM
1

I don't even necessarily disagree that it isn't a problem, not for that reason though, that's pretty much just insecurity. But porn addiction and social media cetaintly shifts the overton window in a bad way, whether people like it or not. No ideas on a solution though, other than sending all pervs to horny jail.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/25 05:30 PM
2

I don't even necessarily disagree that it isn't a problem, not for that reason though, that's pretty much just insecurity. But porn addiction and social media cetaintly shifts the overton window in a bad way, whether people like it or not. No ideas on a solution though, other than sending all pervs to horny jail.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/25 05:30 PM
3

I thought women were mega ultra oppressed for most of human history? So oppression = blue pill? Good to know.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/25 04:13 PM
3

If you go to any of the gaming subs (only the ones I like tho) it's full of the same kind of weirdos responding to valid criticism. So "bad personality" is basically the "ur just bad" of dating discussion. Which is just a lazy spin on good ol fashion trollin'.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/25 04:08 PM
1

It's a "league" thing if it happens early on. It can happen for alot of different reasons later on. If it's always just "happening" to you though then you might just simply be into that type of dude tbh, which explains why some guys are like that lmao.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/25 10:23 AM
–

Whataboutism aside, I just want to point out that without generalizations (which includes statistics and most data of anything) we only really have anecdotes to go by. Believe me, you don't want to hear my anecdotes, they'll paint women even worse than any statistic ever could.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/25 09:00 AM
3

Physically I think it's similar atleast (obviously you can't get intimacy from your het male friends) as you could just get a pet or take a pill (which is statistically what women actually do). Although It's disingenuous to imply that really any cultures view sexless men and sexless women equally. The social consequences for men can be quite profound, but you'd have to actually listen to those types if you can learn to bare the toxicity. I get why some women can't fully grasp it, we can lead ver…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/25 08:42 AM
2

Statistically older men do better, men obviously get uglier with time (balding, sagging, wrinkles) I actually find the women who do care about looks are the most shallow (and typically not very attractive themselves). Younger more attractive women care more about how "cool" their friends would think you are. "That" gets your foot in the door so to speak. Which is why most people meet through friends. Game/plating just insures that they don't get bored after the intial investment, because general…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/25 09:57 PM
7

Women shirking their gender roles benefits corporations and elites who can exploit their labor, men shirking gender roles does the opposite, plus the vast majority of women are still unwilling to do the hard/dangerous jobs.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/25 02:56 AM
3

Nah bro. Cleaning up the house you live in is just called being a responsible adult, I wash dishes and vaccum my own house all the time, it isn't because of gender roles, it's because I don't want my fucking house to look like a dump. I actually kicked a woman out of my house once because she wouldn't clean up after herself and she actually started tearing up, like nope your ass is out you ain't no damn child and I am not your caretaker.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/25 01:08 AM
5

Yeah, the "man up" position IS the conservative position to this issue, always was. Men are "supposed" to act like "men" and not whine as that is "feminine behavior". Unfortunately, the left has no solution for men who are lonely, like what can leftists even do? Abuse women until they have sex with you? Is that what incels think conservatives are going to do for them instead of sending them to the trenches to die all alone anyway? That's not to say that this issue doesn't matter, but that there …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/06/25 04:05 AM
2

Pretty much this, it's in the state's best interest to not pay, so they make you pay. I'm going to give you guys a life hack real quick while I'm here. If someone is having a child you don't want and they threaten you with involuntary servitude whether you are the father or not, delete your socials and move to a different state/country asap. It'll be virtually impossible for her to weaponize the broken system, since she can no longer have you served papers, and the state isn't going to track you…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/06/25 03:07 AM
21

Women are probably more miserable because they are increasingly forced to be wageslaves just like men now. There's ittle dignity to be found in the current service economy Tbh.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/06/25 08:36 PM
8

Men's endless desperation gives them a free pass to do whatever they want. Doesn't matter what they are "told" as humans are incentive driven creatures and they benefit more from the current dynamic. Your only real recourse is to accept the circumstances and adapt, as they won't change any time soon. Personally "the friendzone" stopped happening to me as soon as I stopped attempting to please the women I was having sex with, because they either want you or they don't, only actions have any subst…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/06/25 08:05 PM
2

The "Average Frustrated Chump" dynamic was never encouraged and in fact derided by the rp. I think in this context "misogynist" could refer to men who use abusive tactics on women. Toxic manipulation and venting frustration with modern dating aren't the samething obviously. This is the inherent flaw with general surveys also, wording matters a fucking lot. Well that and the fact people will just straight up lie.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/25 07:48 AM
1

> hostile sexism that feminism was created to address Feminism in the US atleast originated as a christian prohibition movement I believe, had nothing to do with sexism. It only began to resemble a typical ideological supremacist movement (its current form unfortunately) after the rise of corporate neoliberal dominance.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/06/25 10:16 PM
3

That's just good ol' infantalism, which rad fems, terfs and even conservatives employ. The classic liberal feminist tactic is to overgeneralize and deflect with a "men do it more" as if we are in some sort of competition.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/05/25 09:56 PM
1

I think it could go eitherway really. If all your experiences with women are via internet porn you'll probably view them as sex goddesses, while interacting irl would just make them seem more like normal people, and normal people will generally treat you badly if you are low status, both male and female. Also I think platonic friendship is probably a bad idea if you're very lonely for alot of reasons that would be too long to type, but you probably WOULD want female friends if you weren't, as th…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/25 04:21 PM
3

Not necessarily. It's counterproductive to women's rights because men make up half the population, they can get away with disparities and discrimination for 1 or 2, maybe even 3 generations if the social engineering is strong enough, but when enough people grow up in that kind of system they will want to burn it to the ground as adults, and their children even more so. The reason why it isn't counterproductive to "feminism" is because alot of feminism is just social influencing and/or people ven…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/05/25 07:40 PM
1

Depends on the issue discussed. The vast vast majority of people on the right aren't willing to debate trans rights in good faith, and most I've seen will resort to adhom attacks pretty quick. They generally only debate topics that don't offend them personally. The idea of a trans person in sports with women for example, deeply deeply offends them.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/05/25 04:25 PM
14

Gynocentrism was the default cultural setting for most of recorded history, it's just that now they get "freedom" while men get cold hard duty, on top of gynocentrism.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/05/25 04:05 AM
1

True, but this definitely happens to men too. I think the only thing that seperates the "vulnerable" vs "jerks" is just experience, but the difference is that when men gain enough experience they become more like the tate's of the world, and when women gain experience they buy a farm and put a bunch of cats in it. Neither of these are very good alternatives for society's longevity tbh.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/05/25 03:47 AM
1

I'll agree to all that, if you agree that women are not entitled to commitment, marriage or a place to live just because you had sex with me Deal?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/25 03:47 AM
1

Bro, statistically most people that steal literal babies and children are women, despite men being the sterotyped predators, because there are so many social advantages to having them. In alot of cases women want to have them more than men even. I know I didn't really but I got talked into it. And I would argue not necessarily sex, but men and women segregating would be inhumane for both. Like if you never interact with the other gender you have no real grasp on reality, you just hear things, so…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/25 03:39 AM
1

So they will let literal blatant trolls post constantly, but censor good faith discussion if it doesn't fit the narrative? Why am I not surprised. Wish I had seen this sooner but maybe it got censored. Welp this is my last post here then, this is not the sub for me. Enjoy hating women or whatever, I'm sure it'll work out for you guys eventually.
/r/MensRights03/05/25 12:15 AM
1

Reading is very difficult for some, especially when everyone's brains and attention spans are fried from social media addiction. Keep it short and clickbaity and especially without nuance for those of us with learning impairments.
/r/MensRights03/05/25 12:07 AM
1

Democrats just bring up the lack of male voters to set up a scapegoat to deflect away from their incompetence, complacency, and blatant corruption, not because they actually want to help men or need their votes (harris lost votes across the board not just with men anyway). But I'm extremely pessimistic so take that with a grain of something. Conservatism is simply still worse for men. People generally don't embrace the right because they want to help men, but because they want to hurt women. Tha…
/r/MensRights02/05/25 09:04 AM
-1

A woman isn't going to cure your past trauma bro. I can't tell you what will but it ain't that. Maybe get into lifting, that's what I do.
/r/MensRights27/04/25 11:41 AM
12

The violence all the girls exhibited was explicitly portrayed as contingent to the boys behavior, it is "justified" unlike the other boy's irrational violence. I don't want to watch that ragebait slop again to confirm this, but the black girl attacking the boy was definitely potrayed in a relatively sympathetic light as well, (obviously because her mean girl bestie died) but she gets no real punishment by the authorities as far as I remember, and the boy she beats up gets arrested right afterwar…
/r/MensRights25/04/25 12:30 PM
1

"You aren't evil" but also "trans women who want to use the bathroom of their choice are all secret predators because they have x and y chromosomes" Conservatives "love" men when they are dying for their cause, in war or at home, but if you aren't actively sacrificing yourself at every opportunity you might as well be the most horrible subhuman monster on earth.
/r/MensRights22/04/25 02:23 AM
1

Hear me out, the "cultish" elements of the left are simultaneously what gives it its biggest strengths, and weakness. It creates a typically loyal community for people to feel like they belong at a time when religion (and those communities) are ubiquitously eroding and people are extremely atomized, but the ingroup-outgroup vitriol that is essentially the currency of communities of little means also makes it very paradoxically exclusionary, unfortunately. I don't know how'd you reign this in. In…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/04/25 12:30 AM
1

Firstly, I love hoes. Second I think you are refering to incels, incels aren't redpilled they are mostly just mentally ill and sort of delusional. Thinking they can turn back the clock instead of adapting (via rp) is why they can't get laid.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/25 09:28 AM
1

Just to clarify to help some fellow men going through the same, not signing the birth cert isn't enough to not make you culpable for CS, I found this out the hard way. In family court you're guilty until proven innocent, due process and the constitution take a back seat. What they do if you don't sign it and contest paternity is put you on cs FIRST and then do the paternity test, because the test and the support order are done at the same hearing, no joke. It could take months to get a result ba…
/r/MensRights16/04/25 07:14 AM
2

Manipulation isn't always toxic, if you asked a friend for a favor technically you're leveraging your friendship to get what you want, but no one gets hurt, and if it's reciprocated it's even beneficial. That also acts as a trust excercise, in a way, they go out on a limb for you and you reciprocate. What younger guys get wrong is they don't play this "game" of back and forth correctly, or at all, so women they date get bored and find someone who does play the "game". 9 out of 10 times a "you're…
/r/MensRights06/04/25 11:24 PM
7

I do think the increase in vitriol online probably has something to do with the dating market. Women make the rules, because they make the babies, femcels are made when men don't play by those rules enough, and incels are made when men play by the rules too much. Femcels are just more vocal because misandry is more socially acceptable. I think the middle ground here is evaporating because porn is addicting men to the idea of sex, and social media is addicting women to attention seeking. It's not…
/r/MensRights30/03/25 11:52 PM
1

The entire things plays like propaganda, because if the story was about an adult who did these things the narrative essentially would be "you're evil, the end", but instead it pretends to be sympathetic to parents who have to raise their children in a society that openly despises them for being born male (but conveniently leaves out that last part). Also the scene where the therapist tells him she can't see him anymore is so cringe. No child likes therapy, much less with a cold unfeeling robot w…
/r/MensRights30/03/25 10:59 PM
14

If you said that about race you'd be called racist, statistically when women kill they mostly target men anyway, while men kill more in general but aren't as sexist about it I guess. Source: https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u.s/2019/crime-in-the-u.s.-2019/tables/expanded-homicide-data-table-6.xls
/r/MensRights28/03/25 11:14 PM
1

I can't speak for every state, but I gave my kid's mother money, (more money than I really even had at the time to just be giving), in person right before the first time she took me to court and CSSD didn't care at all about it, it "doesn't count". She hasn't recieved a penny since, couldn't give anything even if I wanted to now, because of the phony protection order I was hit with right before "negotiation" aka the shakedown. I can't even contact her without risking more legal nonsense by the s…
/r/MensRights28/03/25 05:54 AM
–

Morally you should pay if you are able, assuming you have equal opportunity in deciding to be a parent. You just shouldn't ever go to jail for not paying. With the way the system is, you are punished for being a decent, but not perfect father. So you end up with your only realistic options being perfect, or being completely absent. Logically that produces alot of absent fathers. Removing the punishment would also remove the incentive to leave.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/25 05:20 AM
-1

Men are more violent in general, but unlike men women commit more gendered violence than any other type of violence. But men do more of every kind of violence than women, because of the way gender roles work. People generally don't react violently to rejection, maybe manipulation, deceit. Based on statistics and my experience of women's behavior, I'm lead to believe they aren't all that afraid of violent men. I mean statistically men are much much more likely to kill eachother, and the more viol…
/r/MensRights26/03/25 12:19 AM
3

"Ghosting" assumes there was an actual relationship, so there would be a precedent. If you do that alot without good reason than you probably just weren't a very reliable person to begin with. Unfortunately that IS the responsibility of the person who relies on you to find that out, as it is ultimately their burden. It's sorta like going broke at the casino. Don't gamble what you can't afford to lose, as they say. This also goes both ways of course, gender neutrally.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/25 05:14 AM
7

I think neonatal circumcision should be outlawed, but I agree, this literally doesn't make sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/25 04:47 AM
8

I believe it suppresses the conversion of testosterone into dht. Dht does nothing for adult men besides make you look older and enlarge your prostate. Theoretically you'd have more test on fin assuming it doesn't aromatise. I've personally had sexual side effects from prozac, but never fin. Weird how I never heard anyone bring that up.
/r/MensRights17/03/25 09:19 PM
1

All that article states is that theoretically the most successful strategy to reproduce for men was force, while women compete through attractiveness relative to other women. So men choose the most attractive women and then kill or threaten their competitors. It's absolute nonsense to act like nothing can ever change because of the way some people lived tens or hundreds of thousands of years ago anyway. Many things have already changed.
/r/MensRights16/03/25 12:33 PM
4

Depends on your state and judge, technically in my state it's legally possible, but there's alot of loopholes (that I learned the hardway) the court can use to maintain the status quo of male provider/female caretaker. Precedent also matters in the law, and child support historically is a punishment on father's "running away" or as "equity" for not birthing the child yourself (despite having no say in whether a pregnancy is completed or not). On the otherhand many laws involving mother's abandon…
/r/MensRights12/03/25 01:31 AM
17

It's just the modern form of traditional paternalism. "The future is female" definitely sounds like something "daddy" would say to his "little angel". So technically intellegent feminists would classify it "benevolently" sexist or even condescending. Not all feminists of course, some I'm sure love these types of weirdos.
/r/MensRights12/03/25 12:53 AM
1

Crying is definitely not very masculine or macho, you go to basically any general population prison or jail and cry and you're gunna have a rough time. Sure some women might use it against you later, but studies show that men mostly confide in their partners when they have emotional issues like that. I'm not going to shame a dude for crying, and I've defended some younger guys before, but I'm not going to pretend like I'm the best shoulder to cry on just because I'm a man.
/r/MensRights07/03/25 05:06 AM
1

I read this title wrong for a second. We already have an equal protections clause in the constitution, so it'd potentially do more damage than good to amend it.
/r/MensRights07/03/25 04:41 AM
1

That'd be unconstitutional. I know that probably wouldn't stop them from trying though
/r/MensRights07/03/25 04:29 AM
1

Men that don't neatly fit the masculine norm are discriminated, but you'll still have the masculine responsibilities and sacrifices despite having a harder time acquiring the eroding "benefits" of masculinity (depending on how short you are). It's why people get mad at trans women, and in the past, gay men, because they supposedly shirk their "masculine duty" and that's seen as heretical and degenerate to the traditional status quo. You'll have to make more sacrifices than most men to make up fo…
/r/MensRights04/03/25 11:33 PM
2

Well that doesn't make sense, because the crashing birthrates are definitely bad for businesses and the economy. How will the elites replace their wage slaves when they are too old and disabled to be exploited anymore? I think the corporate class just likes to pretend they are part of whatever side is "winning". Just look at all those crony's like jeff bezos and mark zuckerberg completely 180ing their positions the moment the tides begin to change. Ragebait also gets you alot more interaction th…
/r/MensRights04/03/25 03:10 AM
4

This isn't just feminism for men, bro. You wanna make sexist generalizations you gotta go to one of the feminist subreddits and swap the gender.
/r/MensRights23/02/25 04:24 AM
1

So you lost a job due to sexually harrassing a man/woman and now feel the need to cast stones from inside your glass domicile? Weird flex but aight
/r/MensRights23/02/25 03:47 AM
-2

I hate to say it but anime internet porn incels and simps all showed up in the same generation, and I don't think it was just a coincidence
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/25 06:07 AM
5

Over 95% of people killed by police during the blm protests are men, probably still are, that statistic I think started me on my journey in a way. Why does no one care? Do men's lives not matter?
/r/MensRights21/02/25 05:43 AM
24

As far as I'm aware no one was ever physically (or even debatably emotionally) harmed by louis ck. Maybe he made some people feel slightly uncomfortable at worst, it's nothing compared to people like katy perry who will never be held responsible. What louis ck did was weird and pathetic, but it wasn't malicious. People making it out to be are most likely just prejudiced against male sexuality, and because louie isn't a particularly "attractive" man it makes him an easy target. Progessives should…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/02/25 12:15 AM
1

AI's probably not that dumb, give it some credit.
/r/MensRights20/02/25 01:56 AM
3

I feel you man, but you really only got like 3 options, spend ALOT of money on a lawyer and fight her to the bitter end, or you'll have to basically do everything she says. Family courts were created to give mothers every advantage and to suck your resources down, fairness and justice are an afterthought at best. You get 0 points for being a kinda good or even great father, perfection is the bare minimum, anything less is harshly punished by this system. Then people wonder why increasingly more …
/r/MensRights19/02/25 12:04 AM
4

I know reddit always has the knee jerk reaction of "save everything they text/say" but that only works for mothers trying to get child support. If he tries to bring up their petty squabbling in court he'll most likely get punished for wasting the courts time and the judge will probably get pissed he even had the audacity to defend himself. Getting a lawyer paying out the ass and shutting the fuck up are prob his only options unfortunately. Anything less than him being perfect, or her getting arr…
/r/MensRights18/02/25 11:46 PM
4

Observational studies are weak, general surveys are even worse. Although DV is common enough and true crime has an almost exclusive female demo, but if you aren't naturally an asshole you'll just end up demoralizing yourself. Trust me I've been there..
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/25 03:05 AM
0

Damn, so there's a solid of chunk of women who have a fetish for awkward guys like alot of dudes have for chubby women? Guess that explains how I still get laid.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/25 02:37 AM
–

If it works for you good for you, I like to see people take some responsibility in there personal lives. But for me a woman has literally never made me wait to have sex. I've dated about a dozen different women. In fact when I was younger and less experienced I learned with some women that if I didn't try to initiate sex soon enough another guy would just "mysteriously" pop into her life and do so, since she didn't take a sexless relationship all that seriously to begin with. I also think men ha…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/25 06:15 PM
18

The media likes to make it seem like it's men forcing women to have their kids, but it's actually women who usually want them. Had to even wrestle with one of my ex's a few times on the issue since it was much much easier for her to get on an implant then for me to get a potentially irreversible surgery (which any surgeon will tell you to assume a vasectomy is a permanent procedure.
/r/MensRights01/02/25 07:12 PM
1

Republican lead bill, why am I not surprised.
/r/MensRights01/02/25 08:17 AM
5

Female subjugation as a norm was never a thing. Even ancient greeks had plays about how men would stop entire wars just to get some pussy. Women as a group aren't going to pick up guns and go to war anytime soon, so they rely on men for all their fundamental rights, but the men who can get sex will never stop fighting on women's behalf because its in our nature.
/r/MensRights31/01/25 07:53 PM
2

My anecdotes contradict yours. I've had friends massively more confident than me constantly cold approaching women anytime they get the chance, I've yet to see it work once. The rejections are always the most painful too, one cashier at a gas told my friend his breath smelled like shit to his face and he still kept trying to get her number. No way I believe anyone on reddit has the guts to do that once, let alone enough times to actually be successful. Most statistics also show people now meet m…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/25 03:30 AM
-13

I dislike the term "oppressed", it's an overused underdefined term. Anyway, now are you saying you are a virgin/sexless? Or are you saying you identify as "incel" because I can't take it in good faith that you wouldn't understand the difference. People obviously associate negative generalizations with incels online. You can say that's not fair, but it's easily avoided by just not identifying as an incel. With that said, I do believe non-masculine conforming men get treated worse in general, that…
/r/MensRights24/01/25 12:59 AM
6

Yeah, if you're a dude not only is it taboo to ask for dating advice but you're also exposing vulnerabilities to potential competitors that they can use against you later (happened to me several times with "friends" growing up). I think the redpill sub just gave dudes what women always had, the ability to talk shit about the people they dated and mediating methodology. Personally, I read the original redpill sub way before the ban and it did help in terms of dating, but at the cost of being some…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/25 03:05 AM
4

It's harder for guys to get dates because you're competing with every single guy plus closeted polygamists. Meaning women on some level would have to look past the potential of being cheated on, which based on any study I've seen isn't a huge priority for most women. Plus convicts have lots of kids, imagine how much you'd have to overlook to date a literal felon. https://www.americanprogress.org/press/release-nearly-half-of-u-s-children-have-at-least-1-parent-with-a-criminal-record-according-to-…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/25 02:27 AM
1

People act like feminist is synonymous with "left wing" when many of the "feminists" they seethe at are actually right wing terfs. Lots of lefty feminists support a gender neutral draft and other kinds of actual equality.
/r/MensRights19/01/25 05:11 PM
2

That's certainly by design, I don't even blame guys for opting out entirely. Eitherway people are gunna blame you for everything the system does to your children, there really are no winning scenarios here.
/r/MensRights19/01/25 04:52 PM
2

Men have virtually zero reproductive rights despite abortion still being legal in the vast majority of the US. Also gender based legal disparities in criminal sentencing and civil penalties. https://www.centreformalepsychology.com/male-psychology-magazine-listings/misandry-identity-politics-and-dei-an-interview-with-dr-paul-nathanson
/r/MensRights19/01/25 04:41 PM
2

People just like to punch down as much as they safely can, it's cathartic for people who are too dumb to fix their problems and too broke for drugs, gives you the fake feeling of briefly not being the biggest loser in the room. Just about everyone does it, maybe you see it a little more on these dating failure sections of the internet due to the general misery. The disparity is mostly due to traditional values that infantilize women, so not only are infantilizing insults less effective, but any …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/25 07:53 PM
-1

Anime? Sure. My exgf used to get undressed and waive her ass in my face any time I tried to game in front of her though, unless it was something she liked to play also.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/25 07:23 PM
2

I'm sorry that "libertardism" or whatever excuse you use doesn't let you exert your wraith on people for not giving you things man, truly.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/25 07:05 PM
4

"men can't be blamed for anything on this sub" - says person blaming men for everything on this sub Get better ragebait tbh
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/25 06:51 PM
11

Random people on social media can be crazy and say all kinds of moronic nonsensical things, they can claim the earth is flat, or that vaccines were designed for mass murder. What matters is the law, and the reality is that the law is on women's side. Don't marry, don't sign birth certificates, stop giving people who hate you more power to destroy you.
/r/MensRights10/01/25 03:29 PM
8

That's crazy, I just read about that this week https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u.s/2019/crime-in-the-u.s.-2019/tables/expanded-homicide-data-table-6.xls Women kill over twice as many men as women, even white people usually mostly kill other whites, so that's a pretty odd statistic to behold.
/r/MensRights10/01/25 12:45 PM
2

Yeah but only a tiny franction of men commit violent crime. It's more likely that stressful environments just create a hormonal imbalance. Otherwise prisons would be full of body builders and arnold schwarzenegger.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/25 10:07 AM
1

Porn "desensitizes" men the same way that fast food billboards you see on the highway desensitizes people to eating fast food. It does the opposite 100%. Porn is literally free advertising for sex and women have a de facto monopoly over it. And obviously trying to control personal aspects of your partners life is not only silly, but also unethical. It'll never work, it would be massively easier to just go to therapy and try to work out whatever issues you're having.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/25 09:27 AM
5

If the "vast majority of females can spot a pump and dump" then why are you here complaining about it? Either guys do it cuz it works, or you've just completely fabricated a hypothetical to get mad at, which is it?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/25 03:51 PM
1

I'll never understand why women still feel so entitled to marriage. Must be that "patriarchy" that men are conspiring to force upon them.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/12/24 12:41 PM
-8

Yeah, I went to court and the judge did everything she could to avoid giving me the dna test I explicitly asked for (and I never got it because the judge allowed the mother not to take it), but I disagree that it should be mandatory at birth, because it's potentially a privacy violation and it'd cause unnecessary strife in a potentially healthy relationship. It'd also be basically unenforceable, because what if one parent refused? Do they just go to jail and then the newborn is left without a pa…
/r/MensRights31/12/24 11:40 AM
3

I was going to say gone girl but like 10 other people said it lmao, so I'll just bring up kramer vs kramer. Meryl streep intentionally tried to make her character more sympathetic, but if a father did what she did in that movie they'd be seen as a complete monster.
/r/MensRights17/12/24 07:41 AM
-1

Women can literally just drop them off at a fire station (which is an evolution of women literally killing their newborns and dumping their corpses in dumpsters) completely anonymously and have zero responsibility to the child therafter. Anything after that is entirely voluntary. Before that they can fly to a legal state to have an abortion. I'm probably repeating some the samethings I've said before but I'll repeat my point as long as people remain ignorant on the topic: Women abandons child to…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/24 01:38 AM
-26

It's because this sub has been repurposed for far right trolls. Might as well be the new r\The_Donald. Don't be fooled, these guys care about men just as little as the feminists they seethe over, yet come to the men's rights board to spew their identitarian nonsense anyway.
/r/MensRights14/12/24 03:10 AM
4

Be ready to appeal and spend money, don't contact your ex directly ever, get your lawyer to do it if you have to. Alot of these types of cases the judge already knows what they'll do before the hearing and nothing you say will change the outcome, but if you have the resources, don't be discouraged because there's always the sixth district. Remember, the cards ARE stacked against you, but not entirely insurmountable you just gotta pay to play, that's how these things work.
/r/MensRights13/12/24 02:19 AM
3

I don't know about india, but poor people have more kids than rich people.
/r/MensRights13/12/24 02:08 AM
-3

I personally see the most vitriol aimed at men from right leaning people. Also it isn't democrats voting down every bill that tries to add women to the draft.
/r/MensRights11/12/24 12:17 PM
7

You're projecting, hetero women are dating more than men, they have more kids than men, invest heavily into cosmetics that make them more sexually attractive to men. They get extremely depressed seeing more attractive women having successful relationships on social media. Men's lives don't "revolve around women" they revolve around an ideal of what a man is supposed to be, women aren't above that by any means.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/24 12:08 AM
4

Let me put it like this; if a white person crosses the street to not be near a black person, you wouldn't call it indifference, and I wouldn't call it "corrupted love" either.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/24 11:31 PM
14

The alt/far right is who hates feminists, moderate right wingers are gynocentric "men will hurt women if they share bathrooms/sports/cells and that matters more than men being hurt" or "our sons dying in war is fine but our daughters dying is too far" etc. The left just view traditional male gender roles as inherently oppressive (to women), but doesn't really provide men with an alternative, which is why you get those condescending "what should men be if not alpha males?" articles. Generally the…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/12/24 10:01 AM
0

If the supply of labor decreased but demand remained the same, wages would definitely go up, but they might just innovate and replace people entirely in those industries if it's cheaper to do so. Less people forced into wage slavery is a good thing in my book, unless you're a some kinda robosexual.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/24 02:28 AM
1

I think confidence is overblown, I've never been super confident or extroverted and got laid pretty regularly throughout most of my life, there weren't many days in highschool where some guys weren't trying to fight me over a girl I was dating and they weren't. I've also seen insanely confident dudes eat absolute shit trying to approach women, and overconfidence ultimately means not taking "no" for an answer and coming off rapey. It DOES matter, but I think mostly in that you shoot your shot, be…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/24 01:31 AM
1

Nah, most felons have a statistically significant amount of kids because they are very sweet and good guys obviously. Try showering a few hundred more times.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/24 01:08 AM
0

Cheating stats are based on self reports, so really more men are just willing to openly admit to cheating, but logically speaking men have more to gain from cheating because people generally respect male philanderers and many women will ignore men's bad behavior if he's well respected. It's also a double wammy because it plays into mate copying behavior. Women also have more to lose from admitting to cheating because men generally won't be as open to dating them long term if they have a loose pa…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/24 08:18 PM
0

Women only date the trashy kind of guys so you get more of them. Women being the gatekeepers of sex and reproduction makes them the gatekeepers of dating standards. You can't complain about it if you actively perpetuate it, and I mean in general not you personally.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/24 08:08 PM
4

Neoliberalism is defined by authoritarianism, michael bloomberg was a massive stop and frisk simp, obama reauthorized the patriot act and the NDAA. Libs have been trying to ban everything and anything for the last decade (vaping, menthol, guns, soda you name it) just to flex establishment muscle. I won't say that some leftists aren't auths, but to act like the neolib establishment isn't is disingenuous.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/11/24 05:21 AM
3

You are somewhat right, men are locked in a prisoner's dilemma of sorts, but what do you suggest? If somethings worked for someone their whole life you can't expect them to uproot their entire way just because it would be more convenient for you personally. People are incentive driven, shaming strangers has never and will never work.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/11/24 04:30 AM
7

Taxpayers would pay for it anyway with an increased crime rate, and then pay for it again through mass incarceration. Conservatives are fine with that though, they'll pay for anything as long as it's making people more miserable, sadists.
/r/MensRights29/11/24 11:48 AM
1

I'd also add father's righs,, but I'm biased being a father lol
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/11/24 08:33 PM
9

No point in documenting everything if the judge won't even look at it (learned that the hard way), only thing you can do is get a lawyer and go broke fighting slanted legal precedent, or skip town for awhile.
/r/MensRights26/11/24 05:20 AM
1

The idea that women date men for "protection" is silly because women are way more likely to be killed by a partner than a stranger, but stastically men are murdered at several fold the rate of women. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1388777/murder-victims-in-the-us-by-gender/That statistc doesn't make sense unless their was some repercussions from other men for attacking women publicly, but collectively instead of individually from a partner. And I know "my stereotype of men act a certain way…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/24 04:55 AM
7

Yeah so this is an empathy gap issue because men and women generally live very different lives. Women will typically give adivce that benefits themselves more than the men asking for advice, because unfortunately what men and women want out of dating is sometimes at odds. Think of it like a man telling you not to wear makeup because "men don't like women who wear makeup", that's bullshit alot of women look WAY better with makeup that's why most women use it. But that's advice that benefits men b…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/24 03:52 AM
72

Yeah, the left has this problem where they talk about men's issues but only exclusively because of the fact the right is making gains with that demographic in an increasingly authoritarian environment. Unfortunately most of their "solutions" boil down to lip service, because women are already the designated oppressed group and men can't also be oppressed because then who is oppressing women? The right I think is terrible for men for several reasons, but it does provide men a solution to their pr…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/11/24 03:53 AM
1

Don't get me wrong it definitely uses legal feminist neolib rhetoric to the letter, but one of the biggest duluth model simps (chuck derry) did an AMA on menslib and he all but stated he believes that the real justification for duluth is that women are inherently inferior to men. Not very feminist to view women as inferior and needing special protection. So total grift job. It is disgusting though, and unconstitutional.
/r/MensRights19/11/24 12:12 PM
-26

It's crazy how communism simultaneously never works but also clandestinely runs pretty much all of the most wealthy and powerful countries in the west from the shadows. Yeah, that makes sense.
/r/MensRights18/11/24 04:13 AM
6

Same here, man. I came out of a really abusive relationship when I was in my late teens, and my onitis treated me like dirt while calling me "sweet" in texts as she explained how she got with another guy. Very next relationship I got in made damn sure to be less "sweet" and it was my first long term relationship, very intense and loving, even if it was one sided (her side). Years into it got tired of being the asshole and started doing bluepilled things again, like paying for dates, helping her …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/24 10:35 PM
0

Based
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/24 09:52 PM
0

Trump made the economy worse, the only good thing about him is that he will inevitably push society to the left economically, it's just a matter of whether the establishment will fall in line (doubt).
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/24 09:41 PM
8

The sitting president also stepped down from running for relection due to obvious mental decline and they completely skipped a fair and democratic primary in his place, which could have given democrats an idea of how unpopular she was. There were too many mistakes to count.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/24 09:09 PM
2

The economy also includes millions of immigrants who can't join unions or ask for raises without risking deportation by their employer. That's inhumane for everyone involved, including american workers who compete with them for jobs. Harris would have been the first woman president but she was also one of the shortest presidents by alot and I think that matters more. People generally love the diversity tokenism thing when it comes to presidents, like obama for example, I think that would have at…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/24 08:37 PM
-31

Men are stereotypically stronger, if you are creating laws based around racial or gender stereotypes then that's discrimination plain and simple and you can justify anything with that logic. This whole controversy only even exists because of the demonization of feminine men and that they are despised and distrusted because they don't fit in and society hates that (notice how it's always people getting angry over trans women and never trans men in men's sports), and transphobes not seeing trans w…
/r/MensRights15/11/24 05:53 PM
1

Bro almost got diddled.
/r/MensRights14/11/24 02:08 AM
1

Trash talk and political drama is fun and all, but if a candidate reduces the cost of living and gives people a fairer chance to participate in society I'm strategically ignoring a few mean words from trolls.
/r/MensRights07/11/24 05:17 AM
13

For all their talk of "threats to democracy" their candidate sure was not nominated democratically. This kind of thing is why we have primaries in the first place.
/r/MensRights07/11/24 04:23 AM
1

I don't think people irl care about feminists that much man. I think it was just a combination of economic factors and the fact that literally no one picked kamala harris to run for president to begin with. This is just what happens when the establishment would rather lose to a "fascist" than allow for a chance at actual progress in this country.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/24 03:30 AM
27

Even rad fems don't believe that since the entire point of "patriarchy" is to humanize men and dehumanize women. IMO the right doesn't "necessarily" dehumanize men more, but it's an ideology that by default sets men up to be more disposable, and somewhat ironically your humanized for your disposability. eg a firefighter, cop, soldier sacrficing their life to save people and so on. The left just kinda keeps men in the default as oppressors, and even if you do good, men are still by default oppres…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/11/24 07:11 AM
0

This is like claiming "society encourages armed robberies because it's a quick and easy way to make money if you're broke" to a jury. Like you're technically right, but you can't expect people with morals to actually agree with you lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/24 05:54 AM
1

I actually think that the problem with dating apps is that people lie. That ruins it for everybody. Think about like ebay, without reviews you have no idea what you're getting and the more you use it the more likely you'll run into scams, so how do you combat that? You raise your standards and lower your expectations. This is why I think these apps get worse overtime too, because the apps start out with a clean reputation and/or nieve userbases, but eventually honest people can't compete with li…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/24 05:27 AM
–

Well old people have almost zero "reproductive value" but society spends a massive amount of resources on them. Trust me bro, that's not the reason men are disposable.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/24 04:43 AM
2

Woah now, I agreed with you initially, but the left definitely has its fanatics that only care about looking good to the home team and just use social issues as a way to leverage and climb their respective hierarchy, it's foolish to believe otherwise. That being said, tradcons certainly cannot be trusted as their belief system by definition completely contradicts anything resembling progress, for anyone not just men. The left also certainly has not fully embraced men's rights, and the longer the…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/24 09:00 AM
3

The way I see it the american people are treated like dogs and the parties are like owners. Neoliberals have their mountains of food and privileges but barely feed you, until they need something, then they give you the faintest table scraps for your vote. While neocons just keep kicking you in the ribs over and over, with trump being a particular sadist. I think that's why neolibs hate neocons so irrationally despite them not being that much different from one another, they know that a dog that …
/r/MensRights02/11/24 10:16 PM
1

What's so special about a heartbeat? If you removed a heart from a living person and kept it beating with electrodes would it then be murder to pull the plug? I don't think it makes any sense. A heart doesn't have experiences or sentience. If you could remove a heart and put it in someone else they wouldn't become a new person. Likewise an artificial heart doesn't make an artificial human.
/r/MensRights02/11/24 11:35 AM
1

This is a complicated question with no real gender/sex analogue. The closest analogy is like if you were having sex with a guy who you want a future relationship with but he's in an open relationship. Like he doesn't even talk to you most of the time but he just calls you up and bangs you then goes home to his wife and kids and doesn't call you again until he's horny. It's like that BUT there's a few differences, guys suffer harsher social consequences from being single, and they suffer harsher …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/24 11:13 PM
5

I didn't participate in it, but I watched it (mostly) unfold. I remember it started out as a blog made by a guy who was allegedly abused in a relationship by a dev, people who read the blog probably did "harrass" the dev in response to the allegations, in a sense of sending her threatening messages, and the "journalism" thing just kinda became a post-hoc justification for the whole mess. I think along the way it just snowballed into a huge culture war twitter schlock and both sides just kinda ex…
/r/MensRights26/10/24 03:50 AM
9

Told by a judge that by law I did not have the same rights to custody as the mother due to a tender years style loophole (that the media will never talk about). I hear they are changing that in other places and starting to give men equal custody atleast. Not in my state.
/r/MensRights24/10/24 10:07 PM
9

I don't understand this moronic line of reasoning, my granddad was drafted into the navy during nam, but it's irrelevant. The point is that it was a massively discriminatory legal precedent that still exists on the books and is still enforced in the form of selective service, which costs tax payers millions a year. If they aren't going to draft again (and they will because as I said the legal framework is still 100% there) then they need to shut it down for being a waste of money and because it'…
/r/MensRights21/10/24 09:48 PM
-1

Would you rather be hooked up to a homeless person for 9 months sharing your body's resources, or pay a few more taxes a year? Alot of conservatives don't see the hypocrisy in that.
/r/MensRights21/10/24 09:30 PM
-36

Neoliberalism =/ progressivism, establishment dems generally try to appeal to boomers who grew up with roe v wade and the civil rights movement, because old people are the only one's with the free time to vote. Conservatism by definition is a belief in tradtional values, which include men being drafted, being sacrificed on sinking ships, men as default predators, and pretty much every other value real male advocates oppose, they have nothing to offer men beyond taking women's rights away, which …
/r/MensRights21/10/24 09:06 PM
119

Make up about 80% of true crime readers and then play it off as "women just want to know the signs", right before sending another love letter to the local serial killer.
/r/MensRights18/10/24 10:51 PM
1

Trick question, people never stay happy. We either have to give men the same benefits women get (status, welfare, familial, legal, social) from rearing children. There's status in having kids as a man, but not raising them, and I know anytime I had my kid on my own I was just that, on my own . My family and my sister's friends never hesitated to help her with her kids, but me? Never once been given a hand by anybody, same goes for his mother, it's like people jump at the chance to help mother's …
/r/MensRights13/10/24 10:39 PM
1

I think men do psychologically the samething on this topic that alot of women do when it comes to being asked about "bad boys". Men LOVE girls who give it up easy, especially if they are hot, but they don't want to support potential manipulative behaviour, in general, so they say they don't, and maybe they even want to believe that. But high n count girls have high n's for a reason.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/24 02:56 AM
1

This is like how a 7 year old thinks relationships work. Women statistically get attacked by someone they are dating far more than strangers, but I think it's just because there's no honor in attacking random women, they have to "disrespect" you first, usually intimately. The idea that women are forced to date men to not be harmed by randos is a total fantasy.
/r/MensRights09/10/24 12:21 AM
–

That's an incel troll, try not to feed it. Misery loves company.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/24 01:44 AM
3

It was a job, just not the one you preferred. No one is entitled to anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/24 11:48 PM
2

It's actually more like a respect check in saints row and then the rest is rng.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/24 11:28 PM
2

It's actually more like a respect check in saints row and then the rest is rng.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/24 11:28 PM
4

I'd consider it on par with your partner having a celebrity crush, personally I'd consider it very insecure and controlling to try to make them stop, since the odds of them leaving you for brad pitt are astronomically low, but if that's your boundary that's your boundary. No skin off my flute.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/24 11:06 PM
4

This is the first I'm hearing of an "escape fund", is divorce settlements and alimony not enough?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/24 10:52 PM
12

There probably are more people here who hate "feminism" more than actually caring about men's rights, but the only alternative is the "north korea of men's rights discussion" (menslib), and leftmaleadvocates which is a very tiny community in comparison.
/r/MensRights11/09/24 09:51 PM
5

Well they only tend to dislike benevolent sexism because it implies that the "bad" kind is soon to follow. Which is correct since the lion's share of it comes from tradcons. That's why feminism needs to embrace men's rights sooner rather than later and shake off the trad grifters.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/09/24 03:40 AM
1

Welcome to the club, brosky.
/r/MensRights06/09/24 01:32 AM
3

There's along way to go for equality, several laws openly discriminate against boys and men, obviously the draft and circumcision, but many in common law around a father's right to custody and the way dv is handled in some states. I doubt jim crow ever would have been fully wiped from the legal books if there wasn't atleast some mainstream acknowledgement of it. Hell it needed a nationwide movement just to really get the ball moving, which was maybe the biggest movement in american history.
/r/MensRights05/09/24 12:31 AM
2

Women want to be respected, but respecting women won't make you more attractive as a man. Attraction from women is basically just convincing them you are "superior", without making her feel inferior if that makes sense. Most studies I've seen on the topic usually indicate that women are generally more attracted to sexist men, since that could indicate his superiority. I think some women masquerade that as "confidence", but essentially that's what it boils down to. Being "nice" or whatever can ma…
/r/MensRights02/09/24 07:16 PM
10

Yeah, I think when women say "men should be vulnerable" they aren't talking about dudes they're dating and if they did they're probably thinking of the kinda guys that can "get away" with it, basically a guy who's out of her league to begin with. But ultimately sharing your doubts could make her doubt you more, as dehumanizing as it is you're basically constantly selling yourself to her, like if I said I wanna buy this car but the dealer kept talking about how he didn't think it had good mileage…
/r/MensRights31/08/24 08:37 PM
5

Unless your name is ronda rousey, then everyone in the media just calls you girlboss for punching/kneeing your boyfriend in the face.
/r/MensRights30/08/24 10:04 PM
3

As a fellow robot who's never had an interaction with a human.. I empathize with you OP. Meatsacks amiright?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/24 03:22 AM
2

I wish more people were honest like you and admitted child support isn't about "best interests of the child" and is really just about punishing fathers for causing a supposed burden on taxpayers. Certainly I'm sure in your mind these "poor oppressed tax payers" are more deserving of consideration than children who literally might not eat everyday, surely that's a sane postion to have.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/24 03:23 AM
3

Like that in the US too, atleast where the duluth model is used, my ex got a protection order on me based on one very old out of context text message (I shit you not), while I had stacks of paperwork showing her abuses and the judge didn't even pretend to look at what I had, but made sure to make a big showing of looking at her "evidence" from her phone. Obviously the whole thing was just for the child support order that was to come (which the judge referenced multiple times during the PO hearin…
/r/MensRights22/08/24 02:40 PM
1

Single mother's get massive amounts of welfare, you could consider that a "discount" I guess. In theory that satisfies "best interests of the child", but child support still exists, because it's actually more about the "best interests of the state". Also I'm ardently pro-choice, so I believe a woman's body is her own and so is a man's, you can't force parenthood onto someone, it's cruelty to everyone involved, including the child.
/r/MensRights22/08/24 02:18 PM
–

One of my ex's didn't like it at first, and later on pushed me to start doing it. Some people like to get dommed, that's the only reason I ever did it so once she started acting like she liked it It kind of defeated the purpose. Personally I just find it cumbersome, you can't just go to sleep like some kind of animal afterwards you have to get directly into the shower and cry. Real life isn't porn.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/24 01:17 PM
1

People generally take what they can get in the moment, if you're being rejected it simply means there's someone "better", either presently or potentially, "better" can mean anything it's almost pointless to even really care. It's also crazy to me that people act like women won't date ugly guys when you can prove that wrong just by walking into a grocery store. The whole "nice guy" thing usually just implies you can be taken advantage of more easily than most and smarter women won't use that exac…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/24 12:47 PM
-9

Yup, men generally get more respect by default, that helps with getting into positions of power for the top 1%. Many downsides come with those expectations as well, because people assume men are more capable so when you aren't you get less support overall, thus you get way more men ending up homeless or commiting suicide, paradoxically. Also want to point out this is rapidly changing (women getting into positions of power not men becoming less homeless) since women are getting most educational d…
/r/MensRights17/08/24 05:39 PM
1

Think about it logically, it's like if you had a car nobody wants to buy and you take it off the market to punish those who don't even want it. It won't change anything. Plus this isn't women's fault, it's society at large. Unfortunately I can only see the rest of the west ending up like south korea, or worse, where the next generation of men grow up being generally miserable and then they start taking women's rights away to compensate, it's already happening with roe v wade. That's my pessimist…
/r/MensRights16/08/24 01:49 PM
0

This comment makes me sad due to what it implies. I don't want to make any assumptions but I am sorry to hear what you are going through.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/24 06:30 PM
0

It's not a plus so much as women generally just don't care, or it's the same reason women hit on married men, aka social proof. As for single mom's, like someone pointed out, you're more likely to be expected to help her raise the kid at some point, raising kids simply isn't masculine, there's little social or legal rewards for men like there is for women, especially if it isn't your own kid, as a father you have to have a pretty strong bias/bond with your kid to want to stay proactively in thei…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/24 09:08 PM
2

Usually those men are polygamous, but either women or society still expect marriage and commitment so they lie. People generally want their cake and eat it at the same time and cheating is much more socially acceptable then it used to be, women do it often as well and the consequences can be much worse for men.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/24 06:13 PM
–

The dating market is supply and demand, if sex is hard to obtain it means it is in high demand, or low supply. My theory is that one big reason is porn and the internet as an outlet are exploding in profit and it's creating demand in men that women can't keep up with and that spills over into real dating unfortunately.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/24 03:53 PM
2

Only time a woman ever approached me on the street she just randomly repeatedly grabbed me in a very obviously sexual manner. It wasn't a big deal but I remember thinking it was kind of rude. As long as you can keep your hands to yourself you should be fine.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/24 03:35 PM
3

Marriage privatization solves this, and pretty much every other problem involving marriage today. You could also just choose to not get married as shotgun weddings are no longer a common custom. South Carolina is however one of those states where the mother has more rights than the father when it comes to custody, which seems the bigger issue and is explicitly gender discrimination in the law.
/r/MensRights30/07/24 09:49 PM
25

This isn't cherrypicking, it's just that the vast majority of men don't get paternity tests, so the data doesn't actually exist. Technically OP is correct though. Men who get tested because they have a reason to alot of the time aren't the fathers.
/r/MensRights30/07/24 05:58 PM
-4

You could make the argument that men are expected to do those things because women are considered weaker or less competent. Personally I think it's a little bit of both, society definitely openly hates men and in some ways considers women inferior, some women even take advantage of that, but women have made massively more strides in "equality", relatively speaking.
/r/MensRights30/07/24 05:22 PM
0

I'm highly skeptical, onlyfans coinciding with massive levels of simping. Hard to imagine that being pure coincidence. I also think it kind of works like advertising, you're seeing all the stuff you like and now you're thinking about that all day instead of doing something productive. You have to get pretty creative to truly satisfy yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/24 03:18 AM
1

It's functionally harder for men to make social connections, in general than women. Men are assumed predators at worst and competition at best. Thus close friendships for men are harder to obtain, and you have to pay a higher price to maintain them to justify the inherent risks. Tl;dr: it is an issue of societal trust and people generally trust men less Edit: And it is easier to make friends when you already have friends that's also pretty significant.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/24 02:57 AM
1

It depends on the type of feminism, radfem? Probably not, there are forms that genuinely do want equality, albeit just with women "going first". Whether that is the majority or even a significant portion at all of them at all is up for debate. Men simply have no other allies in the mainstream, conservatives mostly only do lip service with nothing to show for it, or they do "tough love" shit like forcing men to die in war to bring back "strong men" or some nonsense. Feminism in some spaces can te…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/24 02:31 AM
4

Reaching from outer space on this one chief. Just had to somehow worm in your orange dictator in a sub where he is completely irrelevant to the topic at hand? I don't think trump or his cronies ever did anything for men, atleast desantis did some stuff for fathers in florida I believe, which is more than any other conservative.
/r/MensRights19/07/24 03:44 AM
2

Why do people go on social media immediately after a crime like your followers are going to help you get unrobbed. Seems neurotic.
/r/MensRights19/07/24 02:59 AM
1

What's the point of making this post if at the end of the day you're still going to call the mostly male police/fire department when your house is on fire to come rescue you? Practice what you preach.
/r/MensRights09/07/24 09:01 AM
1

It's a "need" in a collective sense, you're not really obligated to give a random stranger anything on an individual level. Collectively humans are exterminated without sex so I'd definently call that a need for the survival of humans in general.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/24 04:00 AM
2

Odds of divorce go up when women get a promotion at work. I'd have to see data that atleast implies men on average filter poor or middle class women from their dating pools, otherwise I'd have to appeal to the data already at hand, which suggests otherwise.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/24 03:31 AM
1

Atleast you don't (I presume) have kids with her. Going NC indefinitely is infinitely easier than having a permanent legal/emotional/biological connection with someone who manipulates and abuses the shit out of you at every oppertunity. Men shouldn't ever get married either though, neither the law nor society is on your side & pretty much every benefit has a safer legal alternative that doesn't involve some kind of extortion on the way out.
/r/MensRights09/07/24 03:22 AM
1

Redpill has to be gynocentric in the context of picking up and dating women. That's simply a gynocentric topic in itself. That's what the redpill always was, not a political statement but just realization of a brutal reality. Difference between that and the blackpill is just whether you decide to give up I guess.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/24 07:24 PM
1

Patrice O'neal went on O&A one time and explained why you can't pick up random women on the street, you probably wouldn't want to anyway even if you could.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/24 02:10 AM
5

Patriarchy is a result of men being forced to fight for their property and/or families against other competing tribes. America itself for alongtime was a military occupation of settlers, women settlers weren't even a thing in the early stages of colonialism for a reason. Without combatants willing to fight you have no country, you ultimately have no home because anyone can just take it. Leadership and power historically was about leading a tribe into wars, and frontline combat used to be alot mo…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/24 06:42 PM
0

Maybe this was true in the neolithic period, humans are more collectivist now and being overly agressive and violent gets you killed or locked away by the whole clan. I actually think it's the otherway around even, humans used to be smaller in the past probably because women had less choice, women certainly go after larger more aggressive men on their own volition, as that is their idea of stereotypical masculinity.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/24 06:23 PM
1

Yeah, if you wanted to raise your kids frugally or the way you want to as a parent you shouldn't have broken up, now the government gets to raise your kids while extorting you for money because you can't satisfy your wife.
/r/MensRights19/06/24 02:02 AM
5

To be fair this is also an own on women because they aren't men at all so, "lesser" men are still more of a man than they are. Sexist nonsense, even people who agree men are and should be disposable probably find it being put this way crass, especially in the context of a child being harmed.
/r/MensRights19/06/24 01:36 AM
1

Exactly, look at the draft for example, feminist politicians like josh hawley do everything they can to stop women from registering and having equal responsibility, and then biden comes out as the first openly anti-feminist president and says straight up that women should have to sign up alongside men. These evil feminists even tried to undo his election victory in 2020 because they know their gynocentric ideology is falling apart.
/r/MensRights18/06/24 08:31 PM
-1

People have been saying this since the colonization of america began. It won't happen for the same reason napoleon couldn't hold europe. Because every single other country will get involved, which includes the entire world now. The allied forces didn't make nato and the european union for funsies.
/r/MensRights05/06/24 11:16 AM
1

Well it's not like it's only women that get raped during wars anyway, or even during peacetime in a military setting.
/r/MensRights05/06/24 10:55 AM
46

If the draft included women it would have been abolished ages ago.
/r/MensRights31/05/24 06:16 AM
3

Sure, when it comes to things like dv and other zero sum game issues feminists generally will side against men in favor of women. But feminist did not create "women and children first" circumcision laws, or the draft, in fact some rallied against the later. The reason why I think this obsessive hatred of feminism is counter productive is because there literally is NO mainstream institution that supports men, conservatives definitely don't, and feminists need men, they always have.
/r/MensRights25/05/24 03:48 AM
1

This to me always seemed like a very transparent troll campaign in the same spirit as the "it's ok to be white" thing, designed to make the "other side" get pissed and look crazy for even acknowledging it. It's as easy as watching 2 grizzlies fight on youtube that'll make you never want to get near one unarmed (black bears are cool though). Women literally spend atleast the first 2 decades of their lives in school surrounded by males yet they lived to tell the tale as it were, of course the whol…
/r/MensRights23/05/24 06:03 PM
18

This should be charged as a hate crime. She's literally using derogatory gendered terms to explain why she targeted him. Disgusting.
/r/MensRights22/05/24 08:27 PM
5

You're doing the samething alot of people here do but from the "other side", you want to put all the blame on men, but male friendships don't solve every problem a man can have. You just don't understand how masculinity works and assume it's somekind of optional choice. It's like telling a black person "just pull your pants up and racism goes away" your problem is you lack empathy/understanding of a systemic isssue forced upon a marginalized group.
/r/MensRights20/05/24 02:08 AM
4

Sexbots will be the cotton gin of the modern age, truly.
/r/MensRights19/05/24 02:35 AM
10

My ex was the crazy kind of "traditional" and christian and was very lazy, couldn't cook and wouldn't even clean up after herself when she lived in my house, and I payed all the bills. We didn't live together very long before she found somewhere else to stay, but she had my child and I didn't want them on the street, so I took them in. In hindsight I think it just made her more entitled. But she was a loony trump supporter, so I can't blame this all on feminists unfortunately.
/r/MensRights19/05/24 02:18 AM
21

Don't quote me on this but I believe I saw a stat showing most grape and murder victims are male, especially if you include military and prison grape. Usually people set in their prejudices will just pivot to "well most perpetrators are male" when they hear this, but then you're basically admitting you care more about hating the perpetrators for their immutable physical traits than the victims themselves. The data for these things aren't easily available and I've considered making a collection o…
/r/MensRights19/05/24 02:01 AM
1

If that were true this sub would have been deleted by now. Feminists know on some level they will have to recognize men's right if they want to keep their own, even if they don't like it. I believe losing ground on abortion is a manifestation of that fact.
/r/MensRights15/05/24 11:08 PM
2

Incorrect, if the mother wanted to take the child support and get a baby sitter and go to the bahamas with it, a family judge isn't going to give 2 shits. Plus when the child becomes an adult you still have to pay arrears, usually to the mother who isn't even taking care of them anymore normally. I could go on a long rant, but it basically comes down to 2 things, extra revenue for the government, and a historical symbolic punishment to men for not adhereing to certain gender norms.
/r/MensRights15/05/24 10:41 PM
1

Yeah, people here saying it can't happen probably have never been in a family court. Anything goes if a judge wills it, your safety net if you think something violates an established law is the appeals court, which takes time and money.
/r/MensRights15/05/24 10:34 PM
3

Masculinity is impressed upon kids even at the toddler stage, there's no explicit sexuality there, but I would say that women do have an impact on the way men and boys behave later in life, but very limited and it isn't always intentional. Like you could argue that women bahaving submissively romantically invites male psychopaths who could easily take advantage, and due to their relative success, men may emulate that behavior. But it isn't just sex that drives psychopaths, that should be obvious…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/24 05:17 AM
8

I disagree with this. Orbitors and simps still have wallets. A creep is just the one that refuses to buy her things lol
/r/MensRights12/05/24 02:27 AM
2

Right, it's all far too transactional now. There was probably a period where it worked because people weren't so obsessed with what they were seeing everyday on social media. Now if they aren't getting what they see their friends getting on instagram (which isn't real) it doesn't go anywhere. Just the end result of gamification and monopolization of the online dating market.
/r/MensRights10/05/24 05:19 AM
3

Didn't work for me and I tried for years, both in and out patient. Also be sure to research the drugs they give you, sometimes they PERMANENTLY change the way the brain works and doctors/psychiatrists will NOT TELL YOU THIS. Plenty of lawsuits filed over things like longterm tardive dyskinesia and lawmakers still won't take these dangerous pills off the market while harmless shit like psilocybin is schedule 1.
/r/MensRights09/05/24 02:12 AM
16

When women talk about men "providing" anything it always gives me that feeling I assume women feel when men talk about women's reproductive rights. Like you can have an opinion on it, but you can't and shouldn't be able to tell others how to live their life, it's MEGA cringe and childish.
/r/MensRights09/05/24 01:52 AM
1

Laws put in place by mostly tradcons, tradcons will also shame you for even caring about those laws and then turn the conversation towards how to get women back into the kitchen (which will never ever happen). Feminism will ignore some disadvantages men have in favor of a gynocentric worldview, but it's disingenuous to pretend like the male-only draft or male genital mutilation is a feminist plot.
/r/MensRights08/05/24 05:01 AM
3

Basically just conspiracy theory after conspiracy theory, and then when he gets to the data, it's wage gap fallacy that is essentially a non-sequitur to the rest of the articles ramblings. Wealthy men almost always have 1 (or a few) wives who they inadvertently also make wealthy, who will never make it into any wage gap statistic despite some of the wealthiest women on the planet making their fortunes that way.
/r/MensRights06/05/24 09:15 AM
0

Forcing women to give birth is essentially mutilating their bodies, in some cases possibly killing them. A fetus isn't always even a living thing.
/r/MensRights05/05/24 04:03 AM
1

It is quite literally written into the legal code and has been for a long time. I remember disliking toxic third wave feminism the moment I saw it though, I was also about 16 or younger even. I think growing up made me realize it was just the crazy feminists that are against men but also most conservatives (conservatives hate feminists, but it doesn't mean they want men to have rights either). I'll say that not all feminist are against men's rights, (some are definitely) but some women's issues …
/r/MensRights01/05/24 11:07 PM
6

I think when feminists refer to objectification they are refering to women sexualizing themselves and then being rewarded massively for it via attention and resources. Women see it and then it encourages more women to do it on a societal level. What you're refering to applies more to individuals. I don't know how you would fix this though since it's a pretty normal part of human sexuality and taking away women's ability to publicly display their sexuality or the ability to profit from it seems l…
/r/MensRights26/04/24 01:25 AM
10

If he did it he should be convicted of course, generally that many people coming after you has to mean something, BUT the strongest "evidence" they had against him that they used in court was that he had an ugly looking dick. That literally doesn't even make sense.
/r/MensRights25/04/24 11:06 PM
2

It's hard to not get angry at this one, some women cross the street when you're just minding your own business and others will walk up to you and randomly sexually grope you (both happened to me in the same day). The ironing.
/r/MensRights23/04/24 05:42 AM
-7

What type of "responsibility" do you believe should be afflicted upon them exactly? It's difficult to engage with something like this when the terms are vague. Let's try to think critically here, feminism typically has little to do with accountability or responsibility, it simply opens up women's access to oppurtunities. Traditional gender roles infantilize women, removing their agency, thus also their accountability, and those definitely exist alongside women's increased opportunities. You're g…
/r/MensRights23/04/24 03:57 AM
4

This line of argument essentially thrives under ambiguity. In a sense all humans are oppressed, women aren't special in this regard. Children can't vote or work, or even leave the house without a parents permission, alot of laws are there to protect children not because of hatred or somekind of conspiracy against them. No one calls children oppressed. If you want to be treated like an adult you have to act like it, that's true for everyone.
/r/MensRights21/04/24 04:00 AM
2

They aren't "happier" single lmao. Women are more likely than men to be in a relationship at every stage of life, except maybe when they are older because they usually outlive their partners.
/r/MensRights21/04/24 12:13 AM
1

It's gross, but andrew tate thinks like this and has like a dozen kids.
/r/MensRights18/04/24 12:17 PM
6

Slander involves provable falsehoods and direct monetary damages, and even then it is still debatable whether it should be considered constitutionally protected speech. Otherwise you could just sue anyone who dares to criticize another. Personally I think men should fight fire with fire here and just have groups where they rate women, sooner or later it will be either banned or made outright illegal and then to save face they'll have to also ban AWDTSG.
/r/MensRights18/04/24 05:35 AM
15

Where they potentially go wrong is their generalization of women, insulting someone who insults you first is 100% morally justifiable. Incel is essentially a sexist term when used as an insult anyway, the whole point is to denote you are "lesser" because women don't like you romantically. It's dehumanizing. "Woke" is cringe terminology, but it isn't discriminatory necessarily.
/r/MensRights17/04/24 03:56 AM
1

Nothing, a court will adjudicate you the father if you, (or the mother) get into a custody battle, either way you aren't garunteed anything as a father and will still have to argue why in court you should get your kids. I would say legally it's actually worse, because what if you have doubts of your parentage like if the mother cheated or something. You'll definitely be paying for it while the mother is trying to prevent you from finding out.
/r/MensRights17/04/24 03:29 AM
1

You don't persuade her, you find someone who doesn't need persuading.
/r/MensRights17/04/24 03:24 AM
2

Don't ever let anyone make you feel bad about standing up for your son. As f'd up as it is I was only able to make my ex understand why I didn't want our son cut by asking her if she'd be ok with a similar procedure on a daughter if we had one. She was obviously very upset by this hypothetical. It really is bizarre that fgm is seen as horrific but mgm is a given.
/r/MensRights23/03/24 01:38 AM
2

This isn't necessarily a left or right thing, most people are homophobic whether they want to admit it. Gay men are stereotyped as "feminine" so it is simultaneously an accusation of being more insidiously feminine than you appear, but from women specifically could also be an ignorance of feminine men being treated worse than other men and why men might not want to be seen that way. It's more of a lack empathy usually in that regard than hatred. A well rounded leftist should know that the violen…
/r/MensRights23/03/24 01:17 AM
1

While you are mostly correct and I empathize, I do not believe relationship problems are synonymous with "men's rights" which should, in my opinion, focus more on very real legal issues and it's underlying infrastructure. Intimacy is a biological need, you literally die from it similar to a disease if you can't get it. So it is a social issue. It's not completely unrelated, but lets start with removing the weeds before tending the roses.
/r/MensRights12/03/24 12:30 AM
1

Adoption is already subsidized by taxes and kids still massively fall through the cracks. Keeping people in jail also costs taxpayers. Increasing access to contraceptives and abortion would probably lower the rate of single mothers, and giving father's more rights and protections would bring more men to the table. Unfortunately with the way things are you can't really punish single mother's without punishing innocent children as well.
/r/MensRights02/03/24 02:03 AM
2

It's seems the problem isn't the rumors but certain prejudice employers could potentially have in the workplace. Employers could have many prejudices and the illegality in that wouldbhave to be pretty specific. It's similar to people being accused without proof during metoo and losing their jobs. You should be able to sue the employer for their unfounded prejudice, but unfortunately the legal mechanism for this (outside of obvious racial or gender based discrimination) is very limited due to tra…
/r/MensRights02/03/24 01:41 AM
4

Men have no reason to help eachother out, unless they are gay/bi. Studies show women do prefer to date "benevolent" sexists and "progressive" men are a new and (mostly) uncontested niche where competition isn't as fierce, so you can't really blame guys for finding something that works and sticking to it. I do think men having some kind of solidarity the way women do would be a good thing, and usually male coalitions get demonized in the mainstream, as did MGTOW. But what did MGTOW offer men? Not…
/r/MensRights25/02/24 10:13 PM
0

It depends if he had a court order. With a court order in the US, you can't just "stop paying" there are federal laws that prevent the post-hoc lowering of child support. If he stops paying it without changing the court order, he opens himself up to losing custody and potential jail time. Serving his wife papers would be pretty difficult if she lives out of state and he doesn't know her address though, so even without a court order he better say goodbye to that money.
/r/MensRights17/02/24 02:42 AM
0

Conservatives will use men's issues against feminism or progressivism, but they don't actually genuinely care about men or their rights, they just want to take women's away and try to raly desperate disenfranchised men around things they can easily empathize with. Those same conservatives would be perfectly fine with sending you die in a war or continuing to allow the routine genital mutilation of baby boys, or the demonization of men's sexuality.
/r/MensRights17/02/24 02:31 AM
1

I think they genuinely feel inferior to the <1% of men who run society and they probably feel inferior to the <1% of women who are really hot and get alot of attention on social media.
/r/MensRights17/02/24 02:14 AM
3

This could be the libertarian in me talking and while agree it should be mandatory when it comes to things like child support, I could see this one huring men more than not. Because I could see some men refusing to do the test out of pride or "respect" for the woman they are dating, and then how do you enforce this? Does the man go to jail for refusing? Does the mother? Who gets the child if both refuse, the state? Seems like a bad idea for all involved.
/r/MensRights17/02/24 01:44 AM
12

So then we'd have to make adoption, safe havens and contraceptives illegal, due to sex being a binding legal contract. Then you'd see a skyrocketing in people anonymously leaving babies to die in dumpsters again and people abusing children they didn't want anyway. You can't just expect to solve every problem by depriving people of their rights, that's silly and why fascism always fails.
/r/MensRights17/02/24 01:33 AM
1

Well the problem is men's rights don't really fit neatly into the left-right dichotomy. The left is generally about upholding the rights of traditional minorities (which men are not) and the right is mostly interested in the traditional status quo (which sent men to die in wars and coal mines while women stayed at home and so on). I would actually argue that men's rights IS the natural evolution of progressive or feminist ideology due to the obvious fact that you can't have blatant double standa…
/r/MensRights17/02/24 01:02 AM
1

I don't want to victim blame too much here, but it sounds like the lifeguard may have just been using the same logic you were for not defending yourself? on top of that you think not defending yourself makes you look more innocent but some may view it as an "admission of guilt" in a sense. It's like pleading guilty when you are innocent because you think a jury is going to convict you either way. It just isn't wise.
/r/MensRights17/02/24 12:38 AM
2

Yes, creepy isn't necessarily a gendered term since it can be applied to objects, but creep definitely is gendered, just like "loser" and incel. The reason it's used as an insult towards men, because put simply, it works, being successful with women makes you seem valuable and exemplifies the perception of masculinity, so the opposite is also true. Calling someone a creep is used as an insult because alot of men are deeply insecure about their masculinity, rightfully so since being viewed as unm…
/r/MensRights28/01/24 05:08 PM
2

Women automatically have custody by default by law, they don't need to waste time and resources on lawyers to "fight" for what they already have, so they don't need it "awarded" in the first place. That alone taints your sourcing. About this "obligation" do you feel women have an obligation to birth children if they have unprotected sex? You also keep acting like child support laws are gender neutral, but how many women are in jail at any given point for failure to pay, how many are paying? If j…
/r/MensRights24/01/24 09:12 AM
1

I believe they call this grape by deception. I honestly don't know how this is any different than stealthing, or poking holes in a condom, which is definitely illegal in some places.
/r/MensRights24/01/24 06:07 AM
20

Something like this kind of happened to me a few months ago. A strange lady came up to me on the street basically asked me for a cigarette and groped me twice on the lower back area. It was weird as hell and obviously sexual and I got out of there quick right after it happened. I eventually was asked during a psychiatric evaluation if I had been sexually assaulted recently so I brought it up and the immediant response I got is "was it playful", no way would I have gotten that question if I were …
/r/MensRights24/01/24 05:49 AM
1

Dated a girl like that. She WANTS a baby and isn't admitting it directly. We really should have a pill or implant type thing for men, but your only options are potentially permanent surgery, or being very skilled at the ol pull out method+condom. But yeah, if you absolutely don't want one you're incompatible anyway, because she does.
/r/MensRights15/01/24 08:49 AM
1

Not really, you don't speak for everyone. My mom left my dad when I was about 2 or 3 and I barely saw him since and don't resent him, I know him just well enough to know that I don't think him being in my life would have changed much, I do feel bad that he spent a year in jail for child support even though my mom almost immediately remarried a rich man after divorcing him. If you had a cousin or uncle that moved away and broke contact would you also resent them and blame them for the way your li…
/r/MensRights14/01/24 06:07 AM
2

In my experience when a woman likes you most of the time they won't be direct about it, and the braver one's won't even ask I was walking around one of the major cities a few months back, literally the first day I was there a homeless seeming lady talked to me for about 2 minutes before randomly groping me, awkward as hell to say the least.
/r/MensRights12/01/24 03:03 AM
1

Twitter is a toxic shithole. The whole infrastructure is built on people trying to out bigot eachother daily.
/r/MensRights12/01/24 02:58 AM
2

Stereotypes. Male sexuality is demonized generally, which is also why women "lose value" when they have alot of sex (with men), so people just assume you as a man don't deserve a relationship by default due to being inherently sexually undesirable, so failing at it for "not being good enough" must be just and righteous. It's also possibly due to lingering infantilization culture or benevolent sexism as feminists call it.
/r/MensRights02/01/24 05:24 AM
4

Everyone likes genuinely kind people. But it isn't a sexually attractive trait to about 99% of women. I think that's where guys get confused. It can probably come off as kind of desperate or simpish too sometimes. If you're like that instead of being "less kind" just try to focus on maintaining your own boundaries when you are trying to get into dating. Get a little give and take going to show you value yourself.
/r/MensRights01/01/24 02:29 AM
3

Doesn't the UN literaly advocate for the genital mutilation of male toddlers?
/r/MensRights01/01/24 02:11 AM
2

I actually think destiny will be fine, and he'll probably even doubledown on his bluepill stuff, but this isn't this man's first rodeo (divorce). He probably won't do as bad in the divorce as most men, simply because he has that experience under his belt. You'd think he'd be smarter than this listening to him talk though. Open relationship aside, I think second marriages have like a 70% failure rate or something.
/r/MensRights22/12/23 01:40 AM
1

I'm just going to say, and I could be wrong here, I don't think the duluth model, tender years doctrine, bradley amendment, or the draft were made and enforced by modern progressive type feminists. Of course, there are feminists who just hate men, as there are men's rights activists who hate women. I just highly highly doubt those kinds of people are anyway near any significant power. People also have to remember feminism/tradition aren't mutually exclusive anymore in america, it's an institutio…
/r/MensRights22/12/23 12:36 AM
1

People act like there's somekind of legal or social basis to the concept of "toxic masculinity", but it only really exists formally in "gender critical" academia, basically make believe. Feminists get strawmanned here too often and it distracts from real issues, mainstream and establishment feminists aren't always helpful, but if you look at the legal and social basis for things that harm men it almost ALWAYS comes from traditional conservatives (which feminists sometimes are).
/r/MensRights19/12/23 10:43 PM
3

This is a common misunderstanding and I used to believe it too, until I looked into the history of child support and family law. Child support literally isn't for the child, it's to compensate the mother for what she feels "entitled" from a man who leaves her. Just look up "the vanishing family", the supposed destruction of the nuclear family caused an influx of particularly brutal child support legislation in the 70s (things like child support arrears not being amendable after the fact, like if…
/r/MensRights02/12/23 04:15 PM
1

Do you believe sex is a binding contract between people to be involuntarily bonded to parenthood by society? Then congratulations, you just justified the total banning of access to abortion and contraceptives. If a woman or the state are entitled to my body, and my labour, then a man or the state is entitled to force you give birth for the betterment of society and to replace diminishing populations. This is your own logic, having one and not the other is de facto inequality.
/r/MensRights02/12/23 04:00 PM
11

You have the right to grieve this hypothetical future you invisioned. Don't know why you'd think you're "entitled" to use someone else's body for your own personal benefit without their consent. Get a surrogate, or go donate sperm.
/r/MensRights27/11/23 09:55 PM
1

I think if it was so hard for women to get jobs in the old days the state of new york wouldn't have had to put someone like typhoid mary on a remote island their whole life just to keep them out of them. Being a stay at home parent is relatively exceedingly easy, especially if you have someone else paying for everything.
/r/MensRights21/11/23 12:21 AM
1

This is a bit silly, the child shouldn't suffer for a mother or father's mistake, but in alot of cases they actually don't anyway (atleast not financially), because single mothers have easy access to government assistence explicitly to keep them out of poverty. I do agree men should have a right to choose parenthood without becoming indentured servants for 20+ years, but not to "force" women to stay, that IS the point of child support, to force men to stay. Two wrongs do NOT make it right, frien…
/r/MensRights12/11/23 04:05 AM
17

I'm glad we have morons like you to remind us that it isn't just feminists who are against men's rights.
/r/MensRights02/11/23 11:15 PM
8

I'm not sure if they actually go on the frontlines, but israel is one of the only countries that conscripts women for military service alongside men. So it's even more inappropriate to make a distinction here, as both men and women can be both victims and combatants.
/r/MensRights24/10/23 12:52 AM
16

Exactly, I think some people are just looking at it from a gynocentric perspective and don't realize that men actually benefit more from being stoic. I think the general idea is that a man being "honest" with his weaknesses or insecurities benefits women because (a. he'll be less "bottled up" therefore less likely to lash out presumably and (b. women get an easier time filtering for "icks" in a partner, it's essentially a win/win for women. The closest equivalent I can think of would be like a m…
/r/MensRights24/10/23 12:31 AM
–

I disagree with that being what a "slut" refers to. But if I went to a drug dealer and told them "i only do the purest coke" and then snort down a sand castle worth, pretty sure I'd still be considered a drug abuser. Not that I'm necessarily shitting on anyone who does that if they aren't hurting anyone else, but if the shoe fits.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/23 08:18 AM
1

People always say this, but it is morally improbable with children and legally impossible. No one ever takes kids into consideration.
/r/MensRights03/10/23 07:45 AM
1

No "rights" in family court only obligation.
/r/MensRights03/10/23 04:01 AM
3

The shit I've seen in family court still makes me question how anyone could conceivably believe any man gets a fair trial, it's utter nonsense. They definently do try to lure you in with bullshit too and they know it's bullshit, everyone does. Family judges virtually have infinite discretion though, if you can't blow tens of thousands on laywers and appeals you'll never get justice as a male.
/r/MensRights03/10/23 03:44 AM
25

You have to consider that these women could do this and still be supported by their husbands and the government while doing it. If men tried it they would lose their jobs and be homeless and starving the next day on top of being labeled terrorists. They would cut food stamps specifically to force men back to work like they are already doing. These governments were never "forced" to give women rights. The men of these communities simply wanted to make their families happy. This society will NOT h…
/r/MensRights28/09/23 12:07 AM
1

Being married or signing the birth cert might make it easier on paper, but in practice they'll still usually award child support and custody to the mother in most cases. If you don't pay every dime in support on schedule or do everything perfectly right which is pretty much impossible if you don't want to be a beaten down slave, they easily get the justification to take custody away from you. All those things actually do is make it easier for the state to garnish your wages while you don't get t…
/r/MensRights26/09/23 07:06 AM
1

The only thing that seperates "chad" from the average man is literally that he doesn't simp, he just doesn't, ever. At most maybe he'll look at your car and change your oil if he LIKES doing that kind of stuff. But her never pays, and always busts then promptly skidaddles. Just the nature of it these days.
/r/MensRights25/09/23 01:50 AM
3

That's your cross to carry then, you aren't entitled to anyone else's life being expended for your benefit, expecially if you have the option to retreat to safety instead. Maybe if it was a fair agreement that everyone made at some point, not made under duress. But I imagine most of the men refusing conscription never agreed to anything. Even in the US selective service is made to men under duress, you can be imprisoned and fined, and you lose your ability to vote or gain a drivers license. It's…
/r/MensRights14/09/23 01:37 AM
2

I think the late great patrice o'neal put it succinctly. Sex is like the bathroom in a house, you need it, but it's not the most important room.
/r/MensRights13/09/23 03:44 AM
-5

If only we had more overlap with based high iq subs like r/destiny so we have more support for streamers who promote humane wife sharing practices.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/09/23 08:55 PM
18

It kind of reminds of that fake town in north korea. Like fake grocery stores and fake people. No idea what purpose it's supposed to serve though. I guess it's just what overmoderation looks like like some people are saying, and the "main" mra sub is like the complete opposite with almost no moderation lol. They are both virtually incoherent at this point.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/09/23 07:58 PM
1

You could be "common law" married in some places if you act like a married couple long enough. I would think at the very least she could, in theory, drag you to court over something like a "fake" wedding, rings and name changes if you live in one of those states. Prenups can be completely thrown out pretty easily also.
/r/MensRights25/08/23 04:47 PM
8

Calling the kettle black now are we? Anyway, I find it disturbing that you would say maxwell "potentially" assisted him when she was convicted and he never even made it to trial, not defending him or saying he didn't do it, but maxwell definently doesn't qualify for a "maybe did it" at this point, especially not by your inane logic. Nice troll though.
/r/MensRights20/08/23 04:54 AM
1

I don't pay anything, but the judge I have is corrupt and incompetent and never ordered a paternity test, so I never even got a number of what I have to pay, before she dragged me to court I would send whatever money I had occasionally to a child I believe is mine (but the mother was a cheater you never know) and now she gets nothing, because I can't even contact her and I wouldn't even know where to send it. Shrug.emoji
/r/MensRights11/08/23 06:36 PM
6

Yeah, they just spend millions of dollars a year to maintain an updated list of all the draftable age men so they can send them birthday cards and such.i.e male privilege.
/r/MensRights04/08/23 11:43 PM
27

You skipped the part about why you need to be married in the first place. Even the prime minister of Canada gets cheated on (probably) and divorced raped and people still paradoxically think any of it makes sense.
/r/MensRights04/08/23 11:35 PM
-3

I'll tell you this right now, the chances she's going to leave for brad pit or ryan gosling are pretty much 0 to none, so it's on the insecure side. But you can choose to not have sex for any reason, that's your boundary.
/r/MensRights04/08/23 10:59 PM
2

What your parents say isn't legally binding, what will be is your paternity status if you are still married, I didn't see anything about a divorce in your post but you might want to get on that, because it WILL matter to a judge. Disproving paternity while married to a cheater is an uphill battle, if you're lucky and you divorce before the child is born, maybe just maybe they'll let you order a dna test before you start paying support. Obviously, you shouldn't take a fatherly role until then bec…
/r/MensRights28/07/23 08:10 PM
1

The movie is cringy and hyper-political, but it shouldn't be taken seriously for several reasons, one being that the entire movie literally takes place inside of the mind of a disgruntled middle aged single(?) mother, if anything the movie is misogynistic.
/r/MensRights26/07/23 12:53 AM
1

Why post the article and give them rage clicks for their propaganda piece though?
/r/MensRights26/07/23 12:47 AM
5

Alimony has nothing to do with kids.
/r/MensRights25/07/23 04:52 AM
2

In my state mothers automatically get custody and fathers automatically get financial responsibility (slavery), no idea how that got passed the 14th amendment.
/r/MensRights22/07/23 06:37 PM
2

Child support is literal slavery, you either have to work to pay the STATE or face government violence, slavery certainly is a violation of bodily autonomy. The state already supports children in most cases, and I know blah blah muh taxes, it's not your money once the treasury has it and they can do what they want with it, keeping fathers in prisons also isn't free.
/r/MensRights17/07/23 08:57 AM
1

Don't forget the parenting license. I'm doing my part.gif
/r/MensRights17/07/23 08:42 AM
2

I started to realize men are unequal to women when I was about 12-14 but feminism preaches "equality" with nothing to show for it. There just wasn't a place to discuss it back then, and complaining about anything as a boy or man, makes you look unmasculine and therefore ripe for social exclusion and maybe even violence in some cases.
/r/MensRights16/07/23 01:19 AM
4

They should give you a lawyer, like a public defender, if you can't afford one, which isn't the law currently even though you can be jailed for not paying child support. Why would you want to represent yourself if you don't have to? No matter how you feel, It always LOOKS better to have an uninvolved party speak on your behalf, because most people aren't going to expect someone to tell on themselves. So it's practically impossible to expect someone representing themselves to seem fair and unbias…
/r/MensRights13/07/23 05:38 PM
2

Traditional values are the reason double standards still exist, and trad values are what keeps men from expressing their true beliefs. That being said you don't necessarily have to be right wing to be trad, for example one particularly brutal law that prevents men from retroactively lowering their child support (even while they're in prison or laid off from work) was drafted by a democrat who watched too much bill cosby and thought men were shirking their "duty". I shit you not, look up "vanishi…
/r/MensRights13/07/23 07:09 AM
8

I had a girl tell me she tried to "change me" and eventually gave up (after 7 years lmao) and then called me controlling in the same sentence, because she had more birth control options than I did. I did not realize this "dynamic" was part of the current zeitgeist.
/r/MensRights10/07/23 10:24 PM
–

Enforcing boundaries inevitably leads to trying to change someone's behavior, women do it too, but its only "controlling" when men do it. Now if you just have boundaries and don't enforce them you will be disregarded and disrespected eventually and that's gender neutral. If you know how someone is from the start and try to change them on a fundamental level I'd just call that idiocy, not necessarily controlling.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/23 02:24 AM
8

People don't like things outside of the norm, it's the unknown, it is scary. Plus alot of people dislike the idea of men "shirking" their "responsibility" (like dying in wars, on sinking ships, child support slavery etc) while women shirk every gender role known to humanity. In short it is socially accepted sexism and a double standard. What feminists don't realize is that if boys grow up with unfair gender expectation they will also expect things of women, you cannot have one without the other.…
/r/MensRights07/07/23 06:22 PM
1

It's tightly guarded by a literal cabal of middle-aged nerds, should be pretty self explanatory.
/r/MensRights06/07/23 09:12 PM
2

Don't let anyone gaslight you into believing the courts are fair, only a few years ago did they have things like duluth and tinder years on the books. Judges were raised on misandry, go in expecting it and you won't have your pants around your ankles, good luck!
/r/MensRights06/07/23 08:51 PM
2

This is very state dependent, but I actually was seeing my kid and they gave full custody to the mother, it is very risky to do this. The court isn't going to want to change the child's "lifestyle" up by giving custody to another person, and the mother has it by default. This is probably also one of those things where the judge you get matters and is particularly a gamble. Eitherway I wish you luck, hopefully you have your justice. Edit: and get a good lawyer!
/r/MensRights06/07/23 08:36 PM
16

Another reason marriage isn't worth it, automatic child support, i.e guilt. In a just world dna testing would be a given in all "contestable" situations.
/r/MensRights06/07/23 08:32 PM
6

The "real" gender pay gap is in things like divorce, child support and sweet sweet alimony.
/r/MensRights05/07/23 04:54 PM
-54

Humans actually have very little genetic dimorphism among sexes. Women are weaker mostly because of societal gender roles that encourage men to be violent (mostly to other men) and thus, stronger. Women are also prioritized and protected in most situations so they don't need as much muscle mass. And before someone brings up test, you can get steroids just from going to a therapist and claiming to be non-binary. Nothing actually stops women from being nearly as strong as men, but nothing forces t…
/r/MensRights29/06/23 05:47 AM
14

Yup, the ubiquitous expectations and successful peer pressuring of something even as extreme as potentially giving your life in a draft, is considered standard baseline. In other words, society is entitled to your sacrifices, so it doesn't make you a good person, it just makes you not a "bad person".
/r/MensRights29/06/23 05:10 AM
1

I don't know how any guy ever gets it in their head that women are attracted to doormats. To be fair I thought that way at some point too, but sure don't know why even to this day. I guess it part of the whole "provider" nonsense, it's "expected" but not really appreciated I guess.
/r/MensRights24/06/23 01:11 AM
0

After you lose the house and car I'm sure a ring, literally bought for a single purpose, is going to matter a whole lot.
/r/MensRights21/06/23 09:27 PM
38

Prenubs are worthless.
/r/MensRights16/06/23 03:29 AM
4

Men are treated unfairly because they are an outgroup, even "the left" clings to it's "ingroup/outgroup" dichotomy extremely religiously, except men aren't as hotly contested as an outgroup as say west african descendants, more like the irish. Her annecdote is very trite and ridiculous because there are plenty of men who aren't excessively violent, she just happens to have a thing for particularly violent men and then in bad faith assumes it of all men. Women are literally the gatekeepers to sex…
/r/MensRights16/06/23 03:17 AM
3

Feminism has nothing to do with men's rights and never did, until it became more of a zero sum game between genders. Now that the zero sum is extremely in women's favor you see feminists "considering" allowing men some minor "concessions" to offset the obvious backlash this will be garunteed to cause when boys grow up on ridiculously unequal playing fields. The balancing act of oppression is peak neoliberalism, the whole thing needs to be torn down and rebuilt, otherwise it will always be a batt…
/r/MensRights01/06/23 02:27 AM
1

Don't quote me on this, but the jodi arias case could fit the criteria, she essentially murdered the guy because he friendbonezoned her. I'd imagine lower level violence involving female perpetrators probably doesn't get as much rageclicks as the other way around, so you'll inherently read about it less in general.
/r/MensRights31/05/23 06:22 AM
5

You could say the samething about cs, but when you think about it (as grotesque as it is) dumping babies in a dumpster to die would technically be cheaper for taxpayers than changing laws to allow women to legally and anonymously abandon children at fire stations or hospitals. If a woman does that then 100% of the cost is on the government to rehome them, but that's the law. The feds could easily take some of that warmongering money, put it in a fund, and make sure kids are taken care of in each…
/r/MensRights21/05/23 09:09 AM
0

Terrible to hear dude, I hope it gets better. The system's rigged to shit. My ex begged me for a child and I told her no, so she decided to get off birth control anyway. Few years later she randomly branches and then uses the court to harrass me, and they were happy to oblige her, no paternity test, no due process and the family court is unequivocally above the constitution somehow. Even though I had proof of her harrassment and showing up to my house randomly the judge didn't even pretend to ca…
/r/MensRights20/05/23 09:26 PM
41

No no, you see that's ok, because while women were forced into the kitchen by the patriarchy men were forced to die off goofing around in trenches being shot at by howitzers. Compared to that not being able to open a bank account is atleast 5 or 6 oppressions. Its just maths. We can care about men's problems when the numbers for past hurt feelings even out.
/r/MensRights10/05/23 11:00 PM
2

They aren't forced into anything, a judge told me to my face I had no rights as a father, only responsibilities, the mother gets automatic full custody under the law and I have to spend money and wait years just to see my own kids, simply because I am a man. If the mother wanted to give my son up for adoption, I can't do anything, if she wants child support, I also can't do anything. I'll tell you right now fellas, the only way to win is to not play, i.e don't end up in family court. Don't allow…
/r/MensRights07/05/23 08:32 PM
1

It's simply reality and you are cleary misinformed. If her partner has never stepped foot in a family court, what she's trying to do is no less than deceit.
/r/MensRights07/05/23 05:16 AM
15

In Afghanistan adult men in contested territory were automatically considered by US and its allies to be combatants, plenty of videos online show men in casual clothing carrying grocery bags getting picked off by sniper fire. Women typically were given the benefit of the doubt and weren't shot at. I assume alot of men were coerced to join the insurgents, maybe others were compelled by a need to provide for their families in a harsh environment. I'm also not sure about the gender ratio of casualt…
/r/MensRights29/04/23 04:25 AM
1

They are very clearly below average, that's why they're on here fighting to the death over what an "average man" can offer. Average men don't even want them lmao. We can only be thankful this "gem" is off the market. No one would have "debated" a dude that acted this entitled for so many posts and dehumanized women, in such a way, because it would be ridiculous.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/23 03:48 AM
3

It seems like the "future" will be a "soft" polyandry where a woman has sex with one man in a commited relationship and also has varying amounts of orbitors on standby who also pick up some of the slack in the primary relationship. It's already a part of simp culture to some degree. Or when their older, like some people are saying, they may just rely on sexless orbitors to get by entirely.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/23 02:45 AM
1

Men are disposable in general. Or do you have reason to believe men treat eachother any better? Not trying to deflect, and women generally benefit more from male disposibility, but I don't believe it needs to be an "us vs them" discussion.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/23 02:30 AM
5

Some women I have met have been the cruelest people I have ever known (one a nurse in a mental hospital who got off to mentally abusing patients and another a judge) and some were the kindest and most caring I've ever known, but to attribute that to an entire gender, that doesn't make any sense. It does seem like the worst people manage to get into positions of power but it has nothing to do with gender or feminism, it's just a broken corrupt system that rewards cruelty, because it's cheaper and…
/r/MensRights26/04/23 04:48 AM
1

It's a weird power bruh, but I always try to treat people like humans and be up front, regardless. Also, It's not comparable to women at all though, because being hit on by a guy (if you're a particularly insecure macho guy) can be a threat to your masculinity inwardly and outwardly. Like if you let it continue in public without pushing back people could think you are actually gay, like bottom gay, which is immature, but people do think like that. Personally I just take it as compliment and don'…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/23 10:50 PM
1

Men will still date you of you have a high body count, they just might "judge" you sure. That's not a catch 22 at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/23 10:37 PM
2

Belonging to a group automatically makes you privileged, which is why people cling to identity based solidarity in the first place. Women just have far far more privilege than men, just as whites (in the US) have more privilege than most minorities. The important distinction is the government and most institutions don't really recognize male discrimination on a national or international level yet, even though the data is increasingly irrefutable.
/r/MensRights21/04/23 08:10 PM
-2

Logic and rationality aside. Guns are pretty untrustworthy and they spread gossip, no way can you trust one of those things to live with you in your home without some training and licensing. Also be sure to spay and neuter your guns to keep the populations manageable.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/04/23 01:08 AM
2

This is like one of those anti-drug psa's where a kid smokes weed and then literally everything that could go wrong does, but for marriage instead of drugs. Don't do marriage kids.
/r/MensRights21/04/23 12:46 AM
2

The judge will have no sympathy for you I imagine, there is no "right" answer to this because the system isn't designed for you to get what you want, it's designed for the state to get your money. Everything else is irrelevant. From one father to another, if you take it to court they are going to piledrive you and then ask the mother if she wants a turn and then they'll ask her lawyer and so on. How is it "in the best interests of the child" because that's their mentality, but really it means "h…
/r/MensRights18/04/23 03:49 AM
4

There are different forms of male circumcision that are more or less extreme also, I actually think the one that is the most common (complete removal of the frenulum and foreskin) could be considered similar or analogous to the removal of the clitoris due to so many nerve endings being removed. I also hate the medical excuse thing too, their methodology is basically like saying if it rained more in a month after a ritual that proves the ritual caused the rain (referring to hiv specifically).
/r/MensRights18/04/23 02:50 AM
1

The best advice I can can give to any guy is just do what you want. Someone asks you to help them lift something and you don't want to? Don't do it. You shouldn't have to prove yourself to anyone or "be better" to be considered human, you are already human. Stop validating dehumanizors.
/r/MensRights17/04/23 03:47 AM
16

Have you ever considered maybe you aren't the "real" feminist? Not saying you literally aren't, but that's the same logic you're using here. You're essentially a kkk member saying that the members who do lynch minorites aren't "real" kkk members lmao. How do you ever expect to hammer out your groups bad apples if you won't even acknowledge they exist and hold them accountable? Maybe you just don't want to.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/04/23 05:08 AM
7

If you can trick someone into doing things for you (like a dare) and they did it without hesitation, you'd call that person trustworthy and loyal, especially the more costly what you ask is. That's mostly what religious practices in general are. Basically standardized excersizes of trust that create relatable experiences among people. The only reason we even question it now is because of how much those communities have eroded. In the old days even implying you wouldn't get married could make you…
/r/MensRights15/04/23 03:52 AM
13

Just to be fair to chatgpt, maybe it saw the johnny depp trial and realized that the "take a break" advice is actually harmful to husbands? The other stuff is pretty dumb, but I doubt it's intentional. This thing is ultra-complex yet FAR from perfect.
/r/MensRights15/04/23 03:25 AM
12

You are delusional and most likely only seeing what you want to. The system itself (alimony, child support, increasing dehumanization and disloyalty etc) does not allow for a fair or equitable dating experience, it isn't only women's fault, but they are empirically the big winners of it certainly. Now go play make believe somewhere else.
/r/MensRights07/03/23 11:49 PM
2

I've never met a career criminal that didn't have kids and baby mama(s). But if you don't want to ruin your life, try craigslist.
/r/MensRights07/03/23 11:42 PM
13

So the "solution" is.. segregation? Atleast git gud at concern trolling before posting bud.
/r/MensRights16/02/23 03:19 PM
1

This is one of those topics that separates the supremacists from everyone else imo. Women rake in all the benefits of the 80/20 system at a young age and then when the crows feet start coming in its all "men can't have standards". Really bizarre.
/r/MensRights08/02/23 09:41 AM
5

People have preferences, get over it.
/r/MensRights08/02/23 09:29 AM
-8

You can be a man, and not be masculine, but you wil most likely be discriminated for it anyway. Unmasculine men, get the worst of both worlds, targeted/ostracized by the group for not fitting in, but stereotyped as dangerous anyway. If that isn't toxic maybe I don't understand the term. Feminists will use certain terms in bad faith sure, but when you read into things like the white feather campaign during ww2 you realize a few women/feminists were complicit, but it was lead mostly by other men. …
/r/MensRights22/01/23 08:44 PM
2

Almost sounds like you'd rather they be dragging men through the unconsitutional manhating system that is the family court. I on the otherhand fully support all the single cat madames.
/r/MensRights10/01/23 09:32 PM
7

It isn't "invisible", it's just inconvenient.
/r/MensRights10/01/23 09:20 PM
3

Women have entire markets only they can really consistently profit from (divorce, child support, sex work etc), so until those are included these "gaps" will always lack proper context. I will say that an extremely small minority of men do better than women generally, and women as a whole do better than men as a whole. As is shown in things like homelessness, incarceration, suicide, education, the list goes on. Some men just end up beating women out in the most competitive (and better paying) fi…
/r/MensRights09/01/23 02:42 PM
8

There are constitutional amendments and federal laws that garuntee equality under the law, the problem is the "civil" courts can make their own rules on a whim and usually make corrupt deals with the establishment, for profit. And the establishment (not just feminists) has a hard time accepting men as human beings capable of hardship. This is why it's just better to get a vasectomy and never marry, so you don't end up in one of these "civil" courts. It's all men can do to protect themselves at t…
/r/MensRights28/12/22 09:17 PM
5

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Appeal_to_nature
/r/MensRights27/12/22 09:43 PM
-1

It's fair to be frustrated at toxic stereotypes and double standards, or even individuals, but blaming an entire gender is silly. Most people just play the hand they were dealt.
/r/MensRights23/12/22 07:16 PM
9

Men don't have as much in-group bias as women, generally. Men will literally sacrifice other men to save women (women will ALSO sacrifice men for women). As is shown in policies like "woman and children first", war, and fgm/vawa laws. The men's rights groups that do exist aren't as influential as the feminist equivalent, and they don't get as much funding or institutional backing. His analogy (that you conveniently ignored) is mostly very correct also, and like how there could be non-fascist ind…
/r/MensRights23/12/22 06:40 PM
2

Don't feed the trolls people. They targets subs like these because the feminist boards will ban them almost instantly.
/r/MensRights22/12/22 09:16 PM
2

Another example. Women abandon children in dumpsters = safe haven laws that protect mothers who abandon children Men abandon children with their other parent = child support for 18+ years and months to years in jail if you miss even a single payment If you look at the history of child support laws and things like the "vanishing family" it's pretty obvious these laws were created to force men back into their provider gender roles. They don't take absent mothers into consideration at all and moder…
/r/MensRights14/12/22 07:29 PM
13

Yeah, it's also pretty unconstitutional. In some states if you weren't married the mother gets automatic custody (and support) and the father has to prove paternity and sue for custody. No tender years doctrine needed. No idea how that wouldn't violate the 14th amendment, civil rights act, and now the equality act, but they definently do it. People will claim it's because it's a disagreement between two people so these laws don't apply, but that becomes utter nonsense the moment the state takes …
/r/MensRights07/12/22 12:28 PM
2

You know you're going to pay taxes one way or another right? You're basically saying you'd rather children potentially starve, if a father loses their job, than pay maybe a few more pennies a month in taxes. So who's the real monster here? Even still, putting fathers in jail when they can't pay also costs precious tax money to feed and house them. And obviously police wasting resources arresting them. Edit: Actually I do agree with garnishing since it proves they had the money, as long as it is …
/r/MensRights01/12/22 10:49 AM
5

Yup, had a hearing today and the judge 100% threw my rights into the trash, gave me father responsibilities, but no father rights, and trampled the constitution too, just for good measure. Anyone who says family courts aren't biased ARE LYING. And this was just after a massive family court corruption scandal in my state too.
/r/MensRights30/11/22 04:45 AM
6

You have to draw the line somewhere, the fetus isn't conscious until atleast a few months in, if it is terminated before that point it was never technically "alive" to be "killed". That's why the state or a legal guardian can pull the plug on a brain dead person. But let me ask you this, should parents have a say in having their baby daughters genitally mutilated? Based on your logic you should be fine with even the worst fgm, like removing the clit or sowing things up. See how disgusting it sou…
/r/MensRights23/11/22 05:47 PM
1

I lived with 3 generations of women for the first half of my life with only my disabled vet gdad as a male rolemodel, and that's probably shaped alot of my beliefs on gender. But I've met about 1 or 2 very kind feminine souls that "disproved" some of my preconceived notions as well. In that regard you could say I am probably just unlucky that I haven't met more kind souls.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/22 10:50 PM
2

Date less men with high n counts then. Otherwise why bring it up?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/22 10:36 PM
3

Letting your dick do all the thinking is pretty based, yeah.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/22 10:31 PM
1

Let me guess you started playing games with a guy like fds told you and he responded by ghosting you after getting a lay? I don't know what to tell you, the answer seems pretty obvious. Women do all this "vetting" and gatekeeping and they still get played, it truly "must" be men, right? No way men are just responding naturally to an increasingly hostile and brutally competative space with deminishing returns. Can't possibly be it. I know! Maybe we should make men responsible for their bad behavi…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/22 10:14 PM
3

I must say, the way you turn sexism into ableism is quite impressive honestly.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/22 09:47 PM
0

You started out aggressively concern trolling and now you've 180'd and started whining and playing oppression olympics yourself. Lmao can't make this shit up. Do your parents know you post on reddit without supervision? lol
/r/MensRights21/11/22 08:07 PM
1

Oddly enough, more men AND women are lonely these days and what happens online isn't real life. Men were always simps, but it's possible men are actually raising their standards(I know I have lol). I guess we'll find out.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/22 07:30 PM
1

Well the fed pays the state for "enforcement" as well. When you think about it prisons aren't free either, you have to pay for a prisoners upkeep. So it's probably counterproductive to actually jail fathers, wasting even more tax money.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/22 07:17 PM
1

Yeah, I believe even if you do it the "right" way they can still potentially get child support under the insanely one sided laws. The only real way to be 100% safe is completely anonymous donations. This really should be part of the abortion debate too, if sex isn't a binding "contract" to be responsible for kids at gunpoint, then men should get some leeway as well. Especially when some states even allow women to abandon their children anonymously at fire stations. Total hypocrisy.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/22 07:11 PM
1

The original purpose was to combine church and state. Now it's simply a tradition that has very real and sometimes devastating consequences.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/22 06:57 PM
1

Most of that can be supplanted by giving your partner power of attorney. And you can take that privilege away anytime without losing most of your things and a long drawn out court battle.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/22 06:50 PM
1

Women do resort to violence sometimes, like jodi arias. You seem to have a fundamental misunderstanding of masculinity, it's forced onto children and adults, not a choice. Masculinity is first and foremost a sacrifice, alot of men are bitter because they are expected to make sacrifices their entire lives and they feel women don't pull their weight. Which, depending on your metrics, is statistically verifiable. You can force these men to dissolve their masculinity about as much as you can force a…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/22 06:10 PM
21

It is. If women start treating men better in general maybe they'll have an easier time getting their beloved attention juice.
/r/MensRights21/11/22 05:51 PM
5

I have a son and the mother brought up circumcision to me only a few weeks after he was born, I asked why she would do it and she just laughed and made jokes about it and acted like I wasn't going to get a say, but then when I made a hypothetical about a possible future daughter getting circumcised she almost started crying from anger. And there are forms of fgm that are analogous to male circumcision, like a hoodectomy or labiaplasty(still disgusting to do to a child but that was the point). To…
/r/MensRights21/11/22 05:27 PM
2

These distractions from the current great recession 2.0 are getting really elaborate honestly.
/r/MensRights21/11/22 05:15 PM
22

I've read about defendants using motherhood as a get out of jail card during criminal trials and it usually works, one lady was the mother of one of my friends and I knew for a fact she was terrible at being one. That defense obviously would never work for fathers though, that's why jails are so filled with them. Especially in regards to child support, pretty much a male-only crime.
/r/MensRights21/11/22 05:08 PM
2

Did it really ever have genuine grievance? It started out as a judeo-christian prohibitionist movement. And when you think about it even the issue of voting is kind of debatable when you have 0% chance of being sent to die in a war you could be voting to go into. Then again, we have politicians and lobbyists who war monger that are usually not the one's dying in them either, but I digress.
/r/MensRights21/11/22 04:56 PM
2

First of all that's hyperbole, some women have lost their jobs at religious institutions, because they were outed as former pornstars or sex workers, (prositutes) so it's an understatement to say they were merely non-monogamous, but that same scenario can happen to a man that is a male priest who violates their vow of celebacy too flagrantly as well. Society doesn't necessarily reward women for being picky, society just doesn't punish them for it. It's probably more that when women have many sex…
/r/MensRights21/11/22 04:22 PM
1

It's true, but the way you put it is wrong. This is just part of the "objectification", women suffer from and one of the ways they benefit from it, being displayed in movies,games,media,ads as prizes that men 'win' to be considered "whole" along with a family and a house "the american dream". So men are turned into success/sacrificial objects in turn to get women. I mean they had to give men some reason to work dangerous job, live more independently without support, take risks, and fight wars. T…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/22 06:54 AM
1

If you're the one who asked you should pay, regardless of gender. If they try to pick a specific place from what you offered, go dutch. I think that is fair. Edit. It's also not manditory for a first date to start with buying or eating things, I wouldn't even recommend it. Buy things for the people you like not complete strangers.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/22 06:36 AM
1

Bruh I think you used the wrong alt to post this lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/22 06:30 AM
5

Have you tried turning it off and on again?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/22 06:28 AM
3

Sex is simply the bare-minimum, it's not a "reward" or a necessity. When your partner isn't willing to do it with you anymore the relationship is over and you move on to the next person who is willing to do the bare minimum. You're kidding yourself if you think otherwise.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/22 06:15 AM
3

Ye, when I'm with girls and they start dumping their baggage on me I tell them to keep it to themselves, because I know I can't "share" the way they do without losing frame and or respect. Most girls like when you take charge of the relationship anyway, even if the radfem types here pretend like gender norms ain't still heavily enforced in some parts.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/22 06:00 AM
14

Just because it's an insecurity doesn't mean it isn't rational or valid. If I was looking for a car and a dealer tries to sell me something that's been in a bunch of accidents and probably has shittons of damage and milage under the hood, avoiding it would simply make me a smart shopper.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/22 05:25 AM
2

That's a pretty big generalization, bucko.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/22 05:21 AM
20

Alot of those jobs don't even pay that well, I'd rather take some of that sweet sweet divorce moolah. Most of richest women on the planet got their money from subsequent divorce rapings. Also OP archive that shit homie, don't give these clowns rage clicks.
/r/MensRights11/11/22 08:20 AM
33

Women aren't being forced to die by the ukrainian government, and no one's really calling them out on it. Everyone and their grandma is calling russia evil though, before you use that whataboutism on me. I hope that you thank those brave men for protecting you and everyone else once they are home though instead of tossing them away right after it's all over, like we did to our vets.
/r/MensRights01/11/22 06:08 AM
17

You aren't the one who might be forced to die in someone else's war one day. Maybe you should learn some empathy yourself? Men literally die for your safety and still you belittle them, I get you probably feel bad about it, but maybe you should direct that feeling towards people responsible instead of the people that want to change it as well? It can also come off a bit entitled to say men should die for you, because "that's just the way it is". American men face those same propects and there's …
/r/MensRights01/11/22 05:47 AM
4

Well we don't have equality, men are failing behind in school, employment, homelessness and they still make up most on the job fatalities. Women are actively gaining the ability to opt out of parenthood (after admittedly recently losing some ground) but men still have to pick up the tab. So what is feminism doing to make us equal?
/r/MensRights01/11/22 04:13 AM
3

The issues are pushed for different reasons in the mainstream, but the actual marginalization that men and poc face are eerily similar. All the way up to disparities and segregation. But it happens for exactly the same reason. Stereotypes are self-fulfilling prophecies. Make an effort to not judge people for the things they can't control. We all do it sometimes.
/r/MensRights01/11/22 03:43 AM
1

I actually don't think this is true. Look at something like wolf of Wallstreet. Hookers & Blow is still seen as luxurious living in popculture.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/22 01:29 AM
11

If normal levels of test can force people to be violent I wonder why arnold schwarzenegger and other bodybuilders who took insane amounts of steroids don't all become deranged psychos who mow people down in their constant unrelenting fits of rage. Oh wait, because that's obviously bullshit.
/r/MensRights29/10/22 08:32 AM
12

You don't know what you're talking about. We don't live in nomadic tribes on constant verge of collapse due to labor shortages, infact we are on the verge of a housing shortage and the anthropocene. Some countries even limit the amount of girls families can have because there's a certain carrying cap to the planet. Not even communist china is this collectivist.
/r/MensRights24/10/22 09:56 AM
10

My son was never breastfed and his mother never even produced milk. There are many different formula alternatives for children.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/10/22 09:33 AM
-8

So men choose to be homeless and should pull themselves by their bootstraps? I thought this sub was "leftwing", this sounds like something tucker carlson would read off a teleprompter.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/10/22 09:23 AM
6

Fuuuu- they were like that a few years ago too. The fake back pats are so obnoxious. Alot of them talk like that kid in highschool who will talk shit behind your back, but pretend to like you to your face. They offer condolences yet when you suffer they secretly love it. And think you deserve it, that's why they never offer any real solutions.
/r/MensRights24/10/22 08:02 AM
21

Just to clarify, women could work back then, it just wasn't as common. For reference, typhoid mary was fucking killing people and she had to change jobs constantly to avoid feds, until they permanently locked her ass up for good. They kept catching her by literally following the bodies. The story is actually pretty sad, but I don't get why that lady couldn't just wash her fucking hands. The tax thing does seem gender neutral now though so pretty irrelevant, but also interesting.
/r/MensRights24/10/22 05:54 AM
2

Or white owner refusing black tenets because of "bad personal experiences". No way that'd hold up in court.
/r/EverydayMisandry21/10/22 08:40 PM
5

Most men were brainwashed into sacrificing endlessly for masculinity, coming to the revelation that it's mostly all for nothing probably doesn't feel good to alot of guys. So you end up with bitter identitarians, because some convince themselves that "masculinity" can be saved/salvaged. Even when I see extremely bitter feminists hurling misandry I still realize those emotions are valid even if their reasoning is flawed.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/10/22 08:04 PM
6

You are correct, american men have almost no ingroup bias, unlike women. Study after study shows men will sacrifice other men for women in most hypotheticals too. I mean, when you look at history "women and children first" wasn't just a random phenomenon, it actually got alot of sailors and ship passengers killed (including women ironically).
/r/MensRights20/10/22 09:17 PM
6

Well some states still have abortion legal and more states have it on their ballot. Men are still indentured servants with no recourse in all states, so you might as well call it the new jim crow.
/r/MensRights20/10/22 09:04 PM
3

Anytime I see abortion topics I just keep thinking of what dave chappelle said: "If you can kill this mofo I can atleast abandon it"
/r/MensRights20/10/22 08:38 PM
3

Ye, maintaining the ss system actually costs massive amounts of taxpayer $ (thinking tens - hundreds of millions per year) But no way are the people in charge going to let the system collapse if ww3 or another big war happens and the volunteers aren't enough(and it won't be) At the very least, if they want insurance for their corporate wars the one's that benefit should fund them, not the normal people who will be the direct victims of it.
/r/MensRights11/10/22 05:52 AM
2

It's kind of like asking "what advantages does an employee have over an employer", it depends on how resourceful an individual is and doesn't really apply in general. Men are beggars, they have no bargaining power, collectively speaking, I doubt a whole lot of people will deny that.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/22 03:26 AM
5

Validating mgtow validates their grievances, which are inherently gender related. Alot of feminists view civil rights and gendered issues as a zero sum game. That's why when the scotus ruling on roe v wade was announced alot of women came out saying something along the lines of "men need to pay for this somehow by being forced to have vasectomys" etc, because people in general DO in fact view this as a zero sum game where if women lose rights men should too. Even when there's no male equivalent,…
/r/MensRights09/10/22 01:40 AM
1

I believe it started out as a christian fundamentalist prohibitionist movement. Starting out instead as a movement to take peoples civil rights away. Fun fact.
/r/MensRights08/10/22 11:50 PM
1

Assuming you're american. Your son will most likely grow up in a world where the laws and expectations are skewed. Not every man is necessarily unhappy with things, in the same way not every chattel slave was unhappy with slavery (some former slaves even went on to own there own slaves) it doesn't mean the system works for most and isn't inherently inhumane. I wouldn't force anything onto him if he's doing fine without it. Feminism to me just seems more about female nationalism, it prioritizes t…
/r/MensRights06/10/22 06:02 AM
1

I've lived on my own since I was 16 so maybe I'm biased, but I just don't like feeling like I'm "dating" someone else's parents either. If the parents are cool It isn't a big deal. (My ex lived with her mom till she was 25)
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/22 10:34 PM
1

Being polite and generous is convenient but it doesn't make you attractive. Just make sure that you respect YOURSELF by the end of it. I'm not going to tell other strangers whether to be pessimistic or optimistic about it, sometimes you just get unlucky. You really shouldn't use relationships as way to define yourself though. No one should.
/r/MensRights30/09/22 11:30 PM
2

You'd have to get them to define "patriarchy" otherwise you'd be preaching the quran to mormons probably. We are ALL brainwashed though. Doesn't mean you can't become an apostate.
/r/MensRights30/09/22 10:55 PM
2

Crazy strawman, maybe you should of waited until someone actually said any of that before pulling it out of your rectum? Do women really make less? How about we take into consideration marriage/divorce proceedings alimony and onlyfans accounts. Women are, by and large, the biggest spenders after all.
/r/MensRights30/09/22 10:30 PM
16

Men's rights isn't even inherently right wing though, in fact it's progressive. Most people don't realize they will never achieve women's rights without accommodating men, men will always vote against women when they develop in an unequal society. Feminists tend to view it as simply a zero sum game that you play for dominance then it becomes exactly that, and that's why abortion rights are getting rolled back. Women's rights has vastly overreached men's. It's more complicated why the establishme…
/r/MensRights30/09/22 09:47 PM
7

Good advice, but it won't help OP much. OPs problem is that he has no support due to the extreme shift toward individualism america has been going through. Most women usually expect you to support them not the other way around anyway lol
/r/MensRights08/09/22 04:57 PM
1

It's a great idea, but it'll recieve alot of resistance, and big media propaganda influences america more than the nukes dropped on hiroshima and nagasaki influenced japan to surrender to allied forces. Look at how mgtow gets treated as an example. Wide scale male in-group bias almost garuntees calls for massive change, socially and economically, and no one with any amount of power wants to change anything. Niether male or female. Too many people view rights or privileges as a zero sum game and …
/r/MensRights08/09/22 04:41 PM
4

I hung out with my longtime friends recently and it made me feel worse personally. I find alot of male friends don't drop the rat race act even when they're in good company. One of the more depressing things about masculinity. Excersize is always a good idea though. I don't think OP is alone in this by a mile, but he is pretty unlikely to find true solidarity in these trying times.
/r/MensRights08/09/22 04:08 PM
-2

"Sexual assault" if you mean like unwanted groping, by a woman, doesn't challenge a mans sense of identity (masculinity) the way a man being assaulted by another man would. Most gender role conforming men won't actually care at all. Women also generally don't care when other women grope them, my ex used to tell me stories about a female coworker touching her bottom inappropriately and she talked about it like it was just quirky and annoying, but not dangerous. It's different for women for a few …
/r/MensRights08/09/22 03:10 PM
1

"If you decided" Exactly YOU decided it so why would she have to pay for your decision in a separation, what if she actually wanted to send the baby to daycare and you didn't? The affair thing is pretty irrelevant, unless you want to argue some kind of fraud on her part. Maybe even pain and suffering. But monthly support payments are ridiculous, because it implies you or your ex are like a child with no agency. That's the historical precendent for alimony, women couldn't go out and get jobs like…
/r/MensRights08/09/22 02:27 PM
1

Not trying to one-up you or anything, but I had the american version of this and got a much MUCH larger bill for it. They still ocassionally send me funny little letters about it.
/r/MensRights21/07/22 07:04 AM
5

We've come along way, but pretty sure depp is only being supported because he's a huge celeb alot of people grew up idolizing. So in other words, he's "earned" his humanity, to put it morbidly. Hell, isn't the trial over him losing his film deals over unproven abuser allegations in the first place? Seems like hollywood uses the duluth model, since he still hasn't been brought back to any of those movies yet. Heard was recorded admitting dv, still has her movie deals.
/r/MensRights25/05/22 08:49 AM
2

Gender roles and by and large, sunk cost syndrome. Women invest considerably to childbirth so it's human nature to want to see it through. Alot of single fathers are probably in jail too, jails are like 90% men.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/22 09:41 AM
-3

Exactly! I see more people strawmanning and attacking "feminism" than actually talking about equality or even specific things that harm men. Just makes mra's look bad. Shitty gender norms existed way before the women's suffrage movement and "dismantling" feminism would do fuck all for men, because we're never going back to women being forced back into the kitchen, nor should it be the goal. It'll never happen first of all, and this economy is too brutal to take care of another able bodied adult …
/r/MensRights25/04/22 01:59 AM
5

Pretty much, a lack of empathy is a symptom, but it is caused primarily by a power imbalance. You're willing to talk because you can concede ground, they don't have to concede anything so they don't. But that is a good way to separate the supremacists and grifters from people who truly want equality because they do exist in feminist circles.
/r/MensRights25/04/22 01:42 AM
8

It's actually more like calling someone a slut, except people only really say it online, but the definition varies drastically, I saw someone define it as just not having sex at that moment, so you could be fucking a girl right now, but the same second you pull out, boom, incel. Either that or it pretty much just means "socially conservative".
/r/MensRights25/04/22 01:29 AM
16

It's part of the "prisoner's dilemma" of gender roles. He's become so invested in his idea of masculinity that he's basically the spitting image of an "uncle tom" but for men.
/r/MensRights25/04/22 01:09 AM
14

Everyone treats men and women differently to some degree bro, men and women have different prisons, different bathrooms, different sports league. All predicated on the belief that men are inherently irredeemable monsters and women are not. It's not simply a "get a new venue" issue. Nice try moving the goal posts so far away after failing at shaming and gaslighting though.
/r/MensRights25/04/22 12:58 AM
11

That's a strawman though, by "safe" pretty sure OP meant getting banned. downvoted ≠ getting banned For example you've probably been autobanned from a few subs just for posting here, like for example, pretty sure r/worldnews bans anyone who posts here.
/r/MensRights25/04/22 12:21 AM
5

Just use violence to fulfill a court order telling you how to raise your kids bro Nice take, fascist. If the child consistently did not want to go home, the mother should have been investigated for abuse. Since that is a reasonable persons conclusion. The father should not be forced to throw his own child out of his car.
/r/MensRights24/04/22 07:02 PM
7

This. Also use protection or at least pull out even if she says she's on bc, baby trapping is very real, I think they even "joked" about it on the view or something. Sociopathic but very real, protect your autonomy. EDIT: found the video it was wendy williams on some talk show thing (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H3At_6thwPg) this was way harder to find than I remember, almost like someone tried to scrub it
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen24/04/22 01:32 AM
14

To be fair, if it's a very expensive prenup (done by an expensive lawyer) maybe you get to keep your mother's ashes, after she takes the house, car, and your dignity of course.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen24/04/22 01:26 AM
6

At some point you have to wonder though is owing hundreds of thousands of dollars to the gov in child support worth it, at least this way if it didn't work out he's isn't an indentured servant for 20+ years. The trade off is simply getting literally cucked. This guy is pretty much screwed one way or the other, maybe we all are at this point.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen24/04/22 01:09 AM
8

The "I'm so scared of men and that justifies dehumanizing them" posts always make me laugh, like you just know these are the same people who roll their windows up without missing a beat when they drive through a black neighborhood, but it's cool, since they're just doing it for overtly sexist reasons instead of a racist one lmao If anyone is thinking about posting there, don't, you won't change their minds. They need their hatred to deflect from their own self-esteem issues. You cannot fix them.
/r/MensRights23/04/22 07:59 AM
5

I've seen people argue he deserved it for "stonewalling" her because he'd try to walk away during arguments lol Not giving women attention when they want it is full blown abuse apparently.
/r/MensRights23/04/22 07:21 AM
2

I thought with a good prenup they take half your shit and the house, but without a prenup they get half your shit the house the dog the car and alimony for life. Didn't know about the other stuff though, jesus.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/04/22 12:20 AM
2

You can't sue or prenuptial your way out because child support is money you owe the government. They say it's for the good of the child, but feds can easily foot the bill through welfare. And you can say "why should tax payers foot the bill!" and again "it's for the good of the child", plus taxes generally go to alot of useless shit anyway. It'd be insane to actually force some kids to rely on a parent who can't or doesn't want to pay. Child support is in the best interests of the US treasury.
/r/MensRights14/04/22 11:40 PM
3

People shaming parents for not fitting their disney movie fantasy doesn't cause parents to stick around, it just makes kids feel shittier for being different, which is apparently bad. You're merely pushing a dogma. A dogma that makes men into victims and then denies them victimhood. Do you also blame people who give kids up for adoption or women who get artificially inseminated? edit: I grew up without a dad, I remember the first time I ever felt bad about it was when an adult made it out like I…
/r/MensRights14/04/22 11:06 PM
3

Yeah, I told my ex I didn't want kids at first and I was lucky that she told me before she got off birth control, since she got diagnosed with bpd way later. Wish they made something as convenient for men. As a dude you only get not feeling sex (condom) and surgery, which is pretty fucked. If each parent have some borderline religious sacred duty to "support" children just because of shared dna why is adoption or insemination even a thing, you'd think it'd be a sin too. Seems like a big just wor…
/r/MensRights14/04/22 09:45 PM
2

This could be true too, but what confuses me is if they wanted more women in the military why not make the draft unisex?
/r/MensRights12/04/22 01:18 AM
2

It's like how the British military used to wear wigs, the military industrial complex is sort of like a business, and they want to maintain a certain image. An image where men and women are not equal.
/r/MensRights12/04/22 01:01 AM
3

I didn't do it to my son (even had an argument with my ex about it) and I think he is a happier kid for it.
/r/MensRights06/04/22 05:52 AM
23

This psycho wanted to do it on teenagers, not infants though, so they'd fully remember the pain.
/r/MensRights06/04/22 05:43 AM
7

Collective stockholm syndrome. Constitutionally it should be illegal because fgm is illegal, so the current laws violate the 14th amendment and the civil rights act. Just have to wait for someone to point it out.. any day now...
/r/MensRights06/04/22 05:39 AM
2

Bruh, we had a president (andrew jackson) that literally killed a man over a comment made about his wife, and that was common at the time, all before women's suffrage was even a thing..
/r/MensRights03/04/22 09:42 PM
8

My first date with my now ex baby mama was a literal walk in the park, didn't cost me anything and lasted 6 years before she did what women do. Fds looks more like an incel parody sub, like they use the exact same lingo and everything, just ignore it.
/r/MensRights03/04/22 08:30 PM
1

Removing selective service, and making ALL forms of involuntary genital mutilation illegal should be the first steps. Even I find myself displaying unconscious prejudice towards other men, but I'm optimistic about the next generations.
/r/MensRights03/04/22 08:10 PM
1

Lil bit of simp, lil bit of gender norms. Chris rock "disrespected" his wife (potentially unknowingly) for having a shaved head and Will got peer pressured into smacking him on tv. Total shitshow.
/r/MensRights29/03/22 09:23 PM
3

Men can't be considered "innocents", if you're killed in a contested land and you're a man you automatically get counted as a combatant. Happened all the time when drone strikes hit civilians in the middle east.
/r/MensRights29/03/22 09:15 PM
2

wew lad
/r/MensRights29/03/22 08:52 PM
1

It simply doesn't matter what it's called or how nice people are about how they talk about it. People act in their own best self interests generally, the solution is; violent men have to be excluded and non-violent men have to be embraced. That's not what is happening though, women and men both choose more often to associate with violent men, and non-violent men are ostracized due to the assumption that men are inherently violent, which must mean they are just cowards. It's like how I keep readi…
/r/MensRights29/03/22 08:15 PM
0

Why do you think violence among men is so common though? About 90% of prisoners are men last I heard, do you think jada manipulated all those guys too? Are you saying women have more "common sense" than men? No, it's because violence IS a social expectation of men put simply. You're systemically punished for being non-violent as a man.
/r/MensRights29/03/22 08:00 PM
-3

Asking your bully nicely to stop hitting you after you already gave him your lunch money doesn't work for everyone. You said it yourself, you'll be alone most of your life pretending to be a pacifist, hell even if it does work for you as an individual, people will still view men as violent and aggressive inherently. Screwed if you do or don't, but definitely if you don't.
/r/MensRights28/03/22 07:25 PM
-9

Will hit a man because if he didn't he would look weak to his peers "nOt a ReAl maN". People keep ridiculing him for the infidelity but it's the samething, no one cares if will cheated on his wife, she's just a victim, she gets a shoulder to cry on and a new man, but when a man is cheated on he has to be ostracized, it has to be linked back to his masculinity or "lack" thereof, and if he stays? Then he's pathetic he's weak he's not a real man. People saying punching chris was bad but call him a …
/r/MensRights28/03/22 05:54 PM
3

Toxic masculinity is probably the wrong word, but this is gender role related. Look at how many homeless are men. I just read a post on another subreddit about a guy letting a total stranger invade his house because they (probably) had a vagina. People who commit suicide are individuals, they can't be blamed, but this is a societal issue, everyone contributes. Violence isn't much of an option when you're either violent or socially destitute, I never got more support and attention in my life unti…
/r/MensRights27/03/22 06:52 PM
2

This is peak globalism. The entire account is manufactured consent and pr.
/r/MensRights19/11/21 06:13 PM
15

Duckduckgo also delivers propaganda to the top now, since it's based on bing. I want to swap to something like yandex but I don't think it has a proper search bar add-on, for mozilla.
/r/MensRights19/11/21 05:19 PM
26

Maybe it is because women make them a whole lot more ad revenue being bigger spenders? Or maybe it's just because of the learned tolerance for abuse and suffering in silence. It's like how our grandfathers were forced to be the sacrificial lamb on d-day or in vietnam, but how were they thanked for this sacrifice? Many came home and found that their jobs and lives were no longer even waiting for them, and many still remain broken men. The more sacrifices men make the more people become entitled t…
/r/MensRights19/11/21 05:12 PM
3

Both men and women enforce stereotype (gender roles), but have you never seen boys in school targeting another boy for crying, or not being "tough" enough? Men change their behavior to get women, but why are women so desirable to men, but men aren't so to women? Because hollywood, your friends, and your boss all idolize women. That's partially why women generally get more support than men do. Women have inherent value, men start at 0 and have to claw their way up.
/r/MensRights15/11/21 05:35 PM
4

Yeah, it's like women having their issues from being overweight and some jackass comes in and says "WELL AHCKTUALLY, WOMEN BEING OVERWEIGHT IS A MEN"S ISSUE TOO".
/r/MensRights15/11/21 04:11 PM
7

Wouldn't the nearest gender equivalent to this be like dropping your overweight gf off at a gym or something? Snl hasn't been funny for a long time, if it ever was funny to begin with.
/r/MensRights15/11/21 04:05 PM
2

It may be human nature, but that doesn't make it true. Like how religion is part of human nature as a social (manipulation) adhesive, but not all religions can be simultaneously correct. The arbitrary in-group vs out-group mentality is just how people draw straws to figure out who gets left behind in a world with finite resources, on top of creating partisan social cohesion. This always comes with downsides though, since it's also human nature to not like being on the bottom of a dominance hiera…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/21 05:07 AM
2

You don't have to be a provider nice guy to get women though, and the men who provide and then get rejected anyway, usually get ridiculed by the rest of society, as they should since, as you said, they contribute to unfair and unequal expectations. Things are changing and people will have to adapt, men and women both.
/r/MensRights23/09/21 05:58 AM
8

Prenups aren't magic, they get thrown out in court routinely. Marriage automatically entitles the other person to bunch of shit they didn't earn, and there's no benefit. Everything else is solid advice though.
/r/MensRights23/09/21 05:35 AM
-7

I get what you are saying about pressure, and rejection. But guys (atleast young guys) 100% do this too with women, but more in like a bragging way. I had a friend that told me when he had sex with a girl standing 5 feet away at a party.
/r/MensRights23/09/21 05:26 AM
1

It's all relative, economic and social issues. The reason why it seems men are still expected to sacrifice and lead, but women have equal opportunity, and don't get punished, as much, for not following stereotypes the way men do, is simply because the mainstream of the 2 party system hasn't fully acknowledged men's issues yet. The left has moved on to gender issues with no male analogue, like abortion, and free tampons in bathrooms. As if we have perfect gender equality already. While the right,…
/r/MensRights23/09/21 05:03 AM
30

My ex was also very "jokey" and unempathetic when I brought up my concerns about circumcising our son, when I made the comparison of female circumcision for a hypothetical daughter (like a hoodectomy, which isn't even as bad as male circumcision) we might have had in the future, she got very offended and upset. I pointed out this hypocrisy which, obviously, she refused to acknowledge but couldn't explain how it was any different. The worst thing about it is that there are actual laws to prevent …
/r/MensRights21/09/21 01:35 AM
2

Its origins is in ironic memery, since celibacy is by definition self regulated. Now it's just the fresh new unironic euphemism for virgin, which was getting pretty stale tbh.
/r/MensRights20/09/21 08:19 AM
2

Plus, it isn't really defeatist, plenty of advocacy for self improvement, and prioritizing finding your own self worth and self love in that community, but a lot of people also have issues too and they vent and that's about as bad as it gets really. Now maybe the black pill or even blue pill could be called "defeatist".
/r/MensRights20/09/21 08:04 AM
1

Also, in game theory terms atleast, if every man was a 10/10 millionaire celeb or whatever, that just becomes the new median, then it becomes effectively worthless advice over time. It's good advice for an individual but actually bad advice, in general. The best general and individual advice I can give is just play the numbers game and don't put anything unearned on a pedestal. And just roll with the punches to the nads etc.
/r/MensRights20/09/21 06:57 AM
5

This is going to be really controversial to say, and delete it if it violates any rules or whatever but.. I've been sexually assaulted numerous times in my life, like in highschool one girl intentionally reached into my pants, without even making eye contact, and I had to wrestle her off while people watched and laughed. The thing is, I don't feel shame or embarrassment, which leads me to believe that atleast the non-explicitly violent forms of "sexual assault" are only really bad because people…
/r/MensRights17/09/21 09:36 AM
53

This is the kind of woman who dates a guy for 10 years has a bunch of kids and shit, gets overweight, or older or whatever, becomes massively insecure about it and cheats "preemptively" to desperately cling to the unearned power she felt in her youthful "glory days". All this bs projection is just to shield herself against this massive character flaw. These women display massive red flags, be careful fellas. I should know, I'm in a custody battle with one.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen17/09/21 06:44 AM
1

Bro, women can become literally addicted to sex. The idea that to be a "real man" you have to be sexually dominant is what causes the disparity, and the idea that women need to be "pure" and submissive, basically fragile masculinity. You could add pregnancy but that does affect men too financially/socially, and women actually have many more forms of birth control.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/21 02:28 AM
2

I lived (briefly) with a woman that tried to kick me and some mates out so she could flick the ol bean. Seemed reasonable enough to me lol.
/r/MensRights15/08/21 02:33 AM
-8

Bro, you can't just passively push away incels, you have to actively attack them until they are destroyed or those people who hate you and your ideology will never see how much you are willing to forsake your integrity.
/r/MensRights14/08/21 10:48 PM
1

Even though dating and "rights" are 2 things that have nothing to do with one another and shouldn't. The discussions, specifically who is allowed to express (sometimes hateful) views, is relevant. Some people can express themselves, others cannot even hint at it. That's discrimination.
/r/MensRights14/08/21 10:35 PM
19

Yeah, it seems you either despise and dehumanize them unrelentingly or people associate you with it. Making alot of people, who can empathize somewhat, witch hunt them too. But then you have the people with self esteem issues punch down onto the mentally ill, which is pretty fucked up.
/r/MensRights14/08/21 09:39 PM
2

If society says it's ok to mutilate infants genitals than it must be so? Personally, I don't care about people's moralities because it doesn't mean much to the individual, what I care about is determinism, if it is supposed to happen, it does, people are animals we work together until it doesn't benefit us. Can you really blame us? Honestly though, I wish altruism was an option. And maybe it is in the ways you can spare it.
/r/MensRights09/08/21 02:42 AM
9

I mean this is how daniel shaver died and it wasn't even a person he knew who reported it, it was just some stranger outside his hotel. If it gets any worse they'll just start drone striking people's apartments based on tips given by total strangers of "suicidal" individuals. It's silly but the current reality is too.
/r/MensRights09/08/21 01:17 AM
-5

In my experience there is no "feminism" that wants to take away men's rights, there's tradcon women who pretend to be feminists who say men should go down with the ship or die in wars, or whatever, but you can't have that stuff without also advocating for rolling back women's rights. It doesn't work like that. Those aren't feminists.
/r/MensRights09/08/21 12:02 AM
1

You've shoehorned in your failed relationship as if it were relevant, but it isn't. Seems almost like you are bragging about it. That's sus in itself.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/21 07:55 PM
6

Having sex with fuckbois without committing is definitely a good way of showing who's boss.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/21 07:32 PM
11

Of course there would be more virgins for men if men at least tried to hold themselves to the same standard. I believe there is a stat going around that shows about 8% of women are virgins but around 27% for men, and it is increasing. But men get shamed and ostracized for being virgins, after a certain age, by BOTH men and women. Do women get ostracized for not being virgins? Maybe only by other women sometimes. I do think people get shamed generally less than they did a generation ago though.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/21 07:08 PM
2

Well I mean, you can wife a woman who had a history of cheating, or similar behavior, and hell, you can even raise another man's kid. That's your choice or whatever, my choice is not to do that stuff, so why shame me for it? If anything you're just enabling the mentality that makes people think they can do shitty things and get away with it. You're essentially training someone to create victims.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/21 06:53 PM
2

scientific evidence You think this is good but if you go back a few decades most scientists agreed that white and black people were inherently "different" because of things like skull shape. Even ivy leagues like harvard backed it. All disavowed now of course. Just google "scientific racism".
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen04/08/21 10:43 PM
2

It's actually cartoonishly silly how bad it makes some people look, it actually wouldn't surprise me if the sub is ran by incel-type neckbears larping as narcissistic women.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen04/08/21 10:03 PM
5

Why take those subs down and keep subs like FDS up, which is about as, or even more toxic and sexist than the redpill was?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen04/08/21 09:37 PM
2

Only 739 miles away? What a steal.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen04/08/21 09:03 PM
6

No, they are a concern troll who has a victim complex that borders onto paranoia, it's very apparent in their post history.
/r/MensRights30/07/21 01:13 AM
1

Here is an updated metric https://chapterland.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/13/2017/11/US_FactsFigures_Flyer.pdf Not to denigrate the suicidal but the stats on suicide attempts are pretty allusive, like what counts as an "attempt", and how many times can one person be added to the same stat?
/r/MensRights27/06/21 03:42 AM
1

Finding a partner who is attractive enough but also gives you everything you want and stays with you forever seems like a fine goal. But would these women really respect a man they could manipulate into capitulation so easily, how long could they even manage attraction in that kind of setup? Seems to be a cake and eating it problem. Fds always seems to me more like "venting" than actually applying these "strategies" anyway. Plus, obviously men will just become more bitter and manipulative in kin…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/21 07:00 PM
1

Finding a partner who is attractive enough but also gives you everything you want and stays with you forever seems like a fine goal. But would these women really respect a man they could manipulate into capitulation so easily, how long could they even manage attraction in that kind of setup? Seems to be a cake and eating it problem. Fds always seems to me more like "venting" than actually applying these "strategies" anyway. Plus, obviously men will just become more bitter and manipulative in kin…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/21 06:58 PM
1

On top of that there is a bit of a social pressure for intimacy too, if we're being honest. Post nut clarity is certaintly a real thing also.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/21 06:43 PM
-14

This isn't necessarily true, sure misandry exists and alot of man haters flock to feminist communities, but the same thing happens here. The real problem is that feminism doesn't always acknowledge the problems men face, for instance the institutional one's like the draft/genital mutilation protections, and the social one's that make men 10 times more likely to end up in a jail cell, or dead to a cop, or more likely to end up homeless. But feminism has made alot of progress for women's legal and…
/r/MensRights21/06/21 05:51 PM
8

Women like your job/money on paper, but then you have to wonder why so many of the guys in prison do pretty well in the dating game. If they're in and out of prison they probably don't have good jobs. Women are mainly attracted to STATUS, which the closest thing I can interpret it to would be either the assumed fear or respect you would elicit in others. Younger women are also attracted acutely to excitement, but that's more complicated to explain. People generally just date within class also, l…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/21 03:02 PM
4

Logically all these guys improving themselves and competing like crazy to get women is exactly what allows women to kick back at the finish line to pick the winners. And the bar only gets higher. The whole "women all want to be traditional and feminine underneath it all" doesn't really mean much either, when you look at how the stats are changing as culture changes. Sounds like a bunch of projection from a tradcon.
/r/askTRP04/05/21 02:49 AM
5

Sounds like she's stuck with sunk cost syndrome and can't get free. She must not respect you a whole lot to keep asking you for money when you've already told her no, big red flag. She will either get bored of this game, eventually, and find a better opportunity, or you can give in, so she can bail asap. Either way this seems like a temp arrangement, but what relationship isn't?
/r/askTRP04/05/21 02:31 AM
5

This may be begging the question. And though I agree if men get tricked into having kids they didn't want they should be legally recognized as victims and offset for costs. This is a disingenuous way to go about this conversation. If an adult consents to sex, it can't be rape. Even if you were conned. That doesn't mean you can't remove consent during, if they take the condom off. And even if the person didn't know until after, they are still a victim and should claim damages legally. But that is…
/r/MensRights02/05/21 05:38 AM
5

You're problem isn't that you are nice, your problem is that you did a bunch of shit no one asked you to do and then expected it to be reciprocated, ala implied quid pro quo. That doesn't make people grateful, it makes people feel like they owe you, which is a negative feeling. I empathize with you man, but if you keep getting burnt touching the stovetop why continue to do so? Learn from your mistakes, or the pain you went through was for nothing.
/r/ExRedPill29/04/21 09:53 AM
5

There is "something wrong" with gender roles though. Men are generally seen as violent and aggressive statistically/socially and then men are pushed into prisons or wars. You know what happens to male pacifists? They become targets and aren't respected.
/r/MensRights25/03/21 05:57 PM
1

A girl tried to force her hand in my pants when I rode the bus once in high school and I basically fought her the whole way while people sort of ignored it or laughed. I don't even think guys acknowledge it until it's REALLY bad, because I forgot it even happened until now.
/r/MensRights09/12/20 10:30 AM
1

Women making less than men but spending more than men always seemed like a funny phenomenon to me.
/r/MensRights09/12/20 10:20 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter