TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Cardplay3r Archive

View 6 posts and 499 comments by Cardplay3r on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-3

Wtf did I just read...I stopped reading this sub a while ago but has it gone full apeshit religious zealots or something? Divorced women bad now? Ooookay
/r/MensRights20/04/23 03:37 PM
2

Well idk, so a mod removed it then? It says [removed]
/r/MensRights21/06/22 11:18 PM
2

I think this article needs to be shared more Ironic that you deleted it hours later lol I still read it using a trick but that's just silly.
/r/MensRights21/06/22 09:42 PM
1

She was arrested for having a suspended licence, not for the attitude - at least know what you're arguing. Not familiar with the laws wherever this was but I'm assuming the cop had to arrest her after checking her licence.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/12/20 01:42 AM
1

So your argument rests on two things as far as I see: 1) women should be treated differently than men by police because they are physically weaker, even though potential weapons cancel that. Cops should just increase the risk of being harmed because it's part of the job. I guess fuck equality and fuck protecting yourself. 2) Some cops abuse their power (your story) so other cops should not use their power lawfully. Real head scratcher this one.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/12/20 01:30 AM
1

There's a famous experiment a teacher had done on 10 yr olds like that...one day the blue eyed ones were told they were superior, endlessly praised while the non blue eyed ones criticized, told they were worthless etc - next day reversed. Even knowing ut was an experiment, the praised kids did significantly better on tests, even started to bully the others. Fascinating stuff.
/r/PussyPass19/12/20 01:09 AM
1

Tell me, how was it called for? She was told four times to get out of the car or she will be tased but still chose to not comply. Tasing is obviously safer for the cop who doesn't need to get in a physical fight with risk of injury - even if minor I wouldn't want that were I that cop. Can still end up with scars from her scratching my face or worse: Are you a dude? If so I bet that me and you could’ve put her in cuffs without tasing her or even harming her. Look, normal, well adjusted people don…
/r/PussyPassDenied19/12/20 12:57 AM
8

No it isn't, he still had the right to say that.
/r/PussyPass19/12/20 12:38 AM
1

Yes, it's called resisting arrest. You actually think women should just be able to not get arrested if they don't want to? What a concept.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/12/20 12:32 AM
1

Resisting arrest is more than "being disorderly". I generally despise the entitled and downright criminal police attitude but this guy was just calmly doing his job so ease up on the melodramatics.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/12/20 12:04 AM
1

If emotions were logical they wouldn't be emotions. It's the same old trope of abuse victims staying in it for a long time, sometimes forever.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/12/20 11:38 PM
1

Isn't possession of CP a crime in itself though?
/r/PussyPassDenied18/12/20 11:33 PM
3

Someone with a large following that look up to and are influenced by them in their beliefs. Not that different to music/movie/political stars if you think about it.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/12/20 11:29 PM
3

Hope she's happy she dodged your bullet. Kinda feel sorry for your future gf
/r/PussyPassDenied18/12/20 11:22 PM
7

Probably the budget for half an hour
/r/PussyPassDenied18/12/20 10:13 PM
1

Welcome to my block list incel.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/12/20 04:26 PM
1

It was bound to attract actual misoginysts and incels though
/r/PussyPassDenied18/12/20 04:26 PM
-15

Someone put a misleading title tag please. Embarassing how this sub eats up sensationalist fake news honestly.
/r/MensRights08/03/19 04:46 PM
6

You are probably sarcastic but they do think that which makes no sense to me
/r/MensRights22/02/19 07:01 PM
8

Sure except mainstream femist organizations fight hard to avoid punishment for these women.
/r/MensRights22/02/19 05:27 PM
2

Yes but this subtlety is missed by most feminists - intentionally sometimes.
/r/MensRights02/02/19 04:39 PM
5

Except all forms of FGM are illegal, so a blatant double standard under the law. That is worth bringing up in discussion, as they almost never qualify the types of FGM as you did (I bet most people never even heard of them)
/r/MensRights07/01/19 02:38 AM
-1

What you're saying makes no sense besodes being a rant. Can you just think logically about things without the bs? Trump said he grabbed women by the pussies without waiting - what does that mean?
/r/MensRights04/01/19 07:34 AM
0

Yes he did say that, he said "I don't even wait" - so where is the consent since he didn't wait to get it?
/r/MensRights03/01/19 11:08 PM
9

Corporate dems are, but there is a whole movement against them led by Sanders - for taking money out of politics, universal healthcare etc.
/r/MensRights03/01/19 04:21 PM
-8

How could they consent if he didn't wait for it? They literally didn't have time to...
/r/MensRights03/01/19 04:13 PM
-3

Bragging about sexual assault, what kind of a person does that?
/r/MensRights03/01/19 04:12 PM
5

Sanders is appealing to his base doing this which is understandable, and the way those people understand socialism is so stupid and out of touch to his brand of actual social democracy they would never ever vote for him anyway. I'm convinced he would win by a landslide.
/r/MensRights03/01/19 02:04 PM
-10

Why was it a bait? The main issue was what came after, which was "I don't even wait" (for consent, obviously) so he pretty much admitted to multiple sexual assault. Most of the media was just moronic to focus on the pussy part.
/r/MensRights03/01/19 01:52 PM
1

Well I mean I'm sorry but your brother has much of the fault there as well. How could he think he could get away with that?
/r/MensRights14/12/18 08:35 AM
0

Sue the state on what grounds? There is something called prosecutorial discretion, which states DAs are not onliged to pursue any accusation for anything. And they have protections in place for getting sued.
/r/MensRights17/11/18 12:44 PM
-16

While traumatizing your own child. Not such a good idea.
/r/MensRights01/11/18 06:44 AM
2

That was the official reason given at the time but if you look deeper into it you'll find most, if not all serious historians today do not see that as the reason or even that Britain cared a tiny bit about Belgium. Britain was very on the fence, in fact it's natural ally would have been Germany except they stupidly built up a naval force, eliciting their fears. Churchill as Lord of the Admiralty was the one that pushed for it heavily when very few actually wanted to go into it. By the way, Germa…
/r/MensRights25/10/18 11:31 PM
13

If only noone was.
/r/MensRights25/10/18 03:06 PM
-4

IDK about that, WWI was preeeety much useless carnage for 5 years, tens of millions dead just for the whim of imperial figured and moronic, hugely incompetent generals, all leading to an even bigger carnage two decades later. Britain's involvement in particular is dubious at best, mainly due to the exaggerated fears of losing maval supremacy, which they lost anyway afterwards, ironically to their ally the US. Pretty sure they (and quite possibly the world) would have been in a much better positi…
/r/MensRights25/10/18 03:05 PM
5

There are many people everywhere that don't think seeing a vagina exposed in revealing clothes does not make someone a degenerate. Many european cultures have much less qualms about nudity in general.
/r/MensRights15/10/18 11:22 AM
6

The implication is of the body part being immoral. You don't think exposing naked legs makes someone a degenerate so there must be something different about the part itself being shameful or causing harm in order for exposing it to be immoral. These are simply cultural norms which change over time. It would help if you would think of them as that and not unchanging laws of physics.
/r/MensRights15/10/18 10:40 AM
1

You sound like such a pretentious douchebag.
/r/MensRights15/10/18 08:50 AM
10

If you want to put it like that then ask yourself why you think some body parts are immoral while others are moral.
/r/MensRights15/10/18 08:06 AM
10

we need better female representation Not in a vacuum, I mean only if there is actual discrimination that prevents women from achieving leadership positions - not sure if that's true or it's simply a case of men working harder/wanting it more.
/r/MensRights11/10/18 06:32 AM
4

Let’s not do the internet thing. Guess you missed that part!
/r/MensRights11/10/18 06:29 AM
15

I'm not sure if that's true (no source) but even if it were, laws like these can't be a good solution. Just think of all those garage-based corporations that a couple of friends set up, now they have to randomly search for a woman, extend their board or something like that? Well I don't know the details of this law but if it works like that it can't be good. Another, perhaps even bigger thing is that it's not gender neutral - as in a corporation could discriminate just fine by having an all-wome…
/r/MensRights11/10/18 06:26 AM
2

You need to learn more about numbers and what they mean in different contexts.
/r/MensRights08/10/18 05:43 PM
3

This pendulum swing is such a bs argument. Even if you buy that women were so opressed in the past, the people that are alive now are different ones for the most part. It's just an excuse to benefit from undeserved privileges and exploit others - despicable.
/r/MensRights04/10/18 05:52 PM
8

You need to work on your reading comprehension
/r/MensRights04/10/18 05:46 PM
1

That's like setting your house on fire to get rid of cockroaches. Not a smart idea.
/r/MensRights04/10/18 05:40 PM
-6

The worst thing about Kavanaugh is everyone is talking about this stupid allegations instead of attacking his idiotic, evil policies and perjuries. So no worries, the Democrats are on your side, due to sheer stupidity and incompetence. Sorry about what happened to you by the way.
/r/MensRights04/10/18 11:52 AM
7

Yes it's welcome. I think you should sue your accuser for defamation in civil court too, they need to face consequences or there is no incentive to stop.
/r/MensRights04/10/18 11:50 AM
1

You said it was geared towards positive social changes, I'm arguing the opposite based on that conflation. I do know the meaning, no need for the condescending tone.
/r/MensRights04/10/18 11:41 AM
3

The bigger logical fallacy is he considers everyone saying they were sexually assaulted a victim. You fall into his trap as well in the last sentence. Ask him how does he know someone is a victim without any evidence? We need to stop calling everyone a victim willy nilly, just call them accusers unless there is some pretty clear evidence to back them up.
/r/MensRights04/10/18 11:37 AM
1

Partly to blame is the disollution of due process and constitutional rights; and democracy itself as consequence. Politicians on both sides and the media convinced many people they are to be disregarded if it's done in the name of national security or fighting terrorism that it's only natural for people to want them made obsolete for things they care about deeply as well.
/r/MensRights04/10/18 11:35 AM
1

To...? Go on, super interested in their reactions
/r/MensRights04/10/18 11:31 AM
9

Interrupt their parade with arguments? You would have gotten steam rolled faster than you could say "but". Good call abstaining.
/r/MensRights04/10/18 11:24 AM
2

Idk that just reads like 3rd wave bs radical feminism to me. By the way, there is nothing positive about equality of outcome. It's not irritating, it's outright dystopian.
/r/MensRights04/10/18 11:20 AM
0

Feminism is the ideology and the many organizations that espouse it, joust for political and societal power. Feminists are simply individuals with a wide set of beliefs, behaviours, personalities, many of whom are not even aware or accepting of the ideology of the organizations or they see it in a different way than it actually is; many of whom are not interested in even making it such a big part of their identity that they would be unable to accept and love someone of different opinion. It's no…
/r/MensRights04/10/18 09:21 AM
1

Got a link? I didn't know that, sounds super interesting. It's a good response too.
/r/MensRights04/10/18 02:26 AM
-1

You should apologize for posting this in the first place. How this place has fallen if posting youtube comments is deemed worthy.
/r/MensRights04/10/18 02:18 AM
2

Gynocentric Tradcons I don't know what that is but here's one reason: Trump is a self-admitting serial sexual assaulter: "I grabbed them by the pussy. I don't even wait" The media stupidly always focused on the pussy part and glossed over the all important bolded part. Wait for what, Donald? What didn't you wait for? Could it have been consent? Then comes the fact both he and Clinton were frequent fliers on the child rape plane of their rich pedophile friend. I wonder why you'd want that guy or …
/r/MensRights04/10/18 02:07 AM
1

TRP is not the same as PUA either - being PUAs is rather an effect of their ideology, so they're like a subset of PUAs which have a dubious ideology and are pretty misogynistic, but not the same thing.
/r/MensRights04/10/18 01:52 AM
3

That's all nice and well (thought I don't really agree with it) but the crux of the matter is most times you're not serving your country, you're serving some amoral corporations and immoral leaders whose purpose is to gather more power and resources for themselves and their clique. It's always fascinating for me to see how the propaganda about keeping people safe is presented and believed in the US, where the citizens of the world's only superpower, boasting the most powerful military in history…
/r/MensRights04/10/18 01:46 AM
-2

You are conflating feminism with feminists; two different things, with large overlap of course but still. If you identify with your opinions so much that they become who you are it's hard to be happy. Been there, done that.
/r/MensRights04/10/18 01:35 AM
1

Oh believe me, I'm pretty big on anti-feminism, spent lots of time looking into it in the past yet that sub horrified me. It was so full of white supremacism and antisemitism that it seems they were doing (((this))) every couple of sentences. How ironic considering Trump manages to be even more servile to Israel than previous presidents, which is quite a feat in itself. Trump Derangement Syndrome Damn, I knew he was badass but never knew he was get a whole syndrome named after him badass!
/r/MensRights04/10/18 01:30 AM
-2

Feminists come in different flavors. It's not like there is a written exam to declare yourself one.
/r/MensRights04/10/18 12:43 AM
3

It's not about being afraid though, it's about an icky feeling when someone is touching you without your consent, which is the same for both. Not like female athletes would fear being mauled to death in public if a guy ran the field touching their butts.
/r/MensRights04/10/18 12:42 AM
0

follow all of their tenets and call anyone that disagrees with you some variation of "extremist" You got all that from them saying /r/The_Donald is screwed up? Ok that was a totally unbiased, sensible inference.
/r/MensRights04/10/18 12:38 AM
1

I would, used to visit this sub a lot now it's once every few months as it became very toxic.
/r/MensRights04/10/18 12:36 AM
1

and on humanity pretty much
/r/MensRights04/10/18 12:33 AM
6

*people fucking suck
/r/MensRights28/09/18 12:54 PM
2

Tbh I've felt this sub to be highly toxic for years. I visit once everyfew months, stay a few minutes only to leave, disappointed again.
/r/MensRights26/08/18 03:16 PM
2

Without realising it they are cheering for their own demise, as those private prisons lobby for ever tougher war on drugs laws and other schemes to put as many people in jail as possible.
/r/MensRights26/08/18 02:31 PM
0

That actually happens in countries that focus on rehabilitation instead of revenge..but hey, let's keep the cycle of hate going because what else are we to do right? Copying what others are doing with much better results is obviously out of the question!
/r/MensRights26/08/18 12:40 PM
3

That's extremely unlikely. Not having sufficient evidence to prove rape is extremely different from proving it was a false accusation.
/r/MensRights29/05/18 09:03 PM
3

Romania as well.
/r/MensRights23/03/18 10:23 AM
1

OK but Rome fell in the 5th century, Christianity being but a footnote, nowhere near dominant for any period really. Are you perhaps confusing it with the Byzantine (Eastern Roman) empire?
/r/MensRights23/03/18 10:13 AM
1

Bummer, was expecting some evidence offered...
/r/MensRights22/03/18 08:04 PM
1

Never heard that before and I doubt it's true - got a reputable source? Christianity had gotten big in the Eastern Roman Empire (the Byzantium) due to Emperor Constantine's adoption of it. But in the Western Empire (Rome) it was political infighting, corruption and happenstance, to my admittedly limited knowledge. Would be happy to be proven wrong though.
/r/MensRights22/03/18 11:04 AM
1

Christianity brought down Rome? What? I don't even...
/r/MensRights21/03/18 11:04 PM
10

Yeah there was a patriarchal comittee 1000 years ago to determine how pronouns would be shortened. Language evolved naturally, there is no conspiracy.
/r/MensRights13/02/18 07:27 AM
1

TIL unregulated capitalism = patriarchy. Still, since both genders suffer equally in the work field, there is no reason to pay one gender more, thank you for recognizing that.
/r/MensRights11/01/18 07:23 AM
1

People are not either sjws or good, you know. That guy seems downright abusive, kid going to end up with ptsd like many that were in the military. Boys/men are human first and foremost, with feelings and emotions, in need of love and appreciation. Something that flies over the heads of both feminists and these extreme macho types - funny how they have that in common.
/r/MensRights10/01/18 11:50 PM
1

Using your own logic: if a woman is not happy with earning less, she should choose a higher paying career and not have a family. You are way over simplifying everything. Many people work 2 or 3 jobs just to survive. Many career oriented men can also work so much because it's the only way to get ahead and advance their careers, are conditioned by their upbringing or pressured into it.
/r/MensRights10/01/18 10:49 PM
2

Ok I'll give you that. However they'll also be, on average, happier when fulfilling their biological imperatives - not just children but also having more meaningful, satisfying jobs with less hours (the other major reason for the wage gap, career choices). You think career driven men working 80 hour weeks are happy having no free time? They get to miss out on their families, be very unhappy, full of stress anxiety etc. So you're basically just focusing on one aspect of equality ignoring all the …
/r/MensRights10/01/18 10:15 AM
1

While I agree with most of what you're saying, in your anecdote the child will suffer in development, as maternal connection in the first 2 years is of the upmost importance. The solution is paid maternity/paternity leave, European style.
/r/MensRights10/01/18 10:07 AM
1

I think we really need feminism now to deal with all the wrongs of the '50s era.
/r/MensRights21/12/17 11:00 AM
2

Yes, that's where you point out specific instances women are above men and big feminist organisations have been/are fighting to keep it that way. Like the handling of domestic violence, crime punishment gender gap, custody gap are easy ones.
/r/MensRights29/11/17 10:58 AM
2

Just point out to all the times feminists fight to keep/gain unfair advantagea women have over men. The reasin given for those is always patriarchy thinking it needs to protect women - so point out how they actually love the "patriarchy" when it suits them
/r/MensRights29/11/17 07:40 AM
1

Not sure exactly why but I can't bring myself to believe she is honest. I think she did the "conversion" to remain relevant, maybe she thought this is more popular now and sjw ideogy is waning.
/r/MensRights29/11/17 07:32 AM
5

What's this nonsense. I am from a former communist country, don't remember them trying to destroy the family system lol. On the contrary, they banned abortions for years because they wanted large families.
/r/MensRights13/11/17 06:03 PM
9

I bet you don't use modern medicine and would rather suffer and die from any random disease because "it's biology".
/r/MensRights03/11/17 08:35 AM
10

Most men you know would glafly die so women live instead? Please. Until they've been on the titanic there's no way to know.
/r/MensRights03/11/17 08:33 AM
1

Well then you would just let injustice propagate indefinitely. For examples runaway slaves were doing a moral wrong by your logic. They should have just waited for the law to change! Yes it is an extreme example, precisely why it's good in showing always following rules, no matter what, can have incredibly bad consequences. Hell the whole world would probably be destroyed by nuclear war if everyone applied that principle; there were a couple of very close calls during the Cold War where some guy…
/r/MensRights24/07/17 04:22 PM
3

God forbid you ever break an unjust law that severely restricts your personal freedom. If the people in authority decided it, you must never question it, just blindly follow!
/r/MensRights24/07/17 12:57 PM
51

No worries darling, I wouldn't want to be anywhere near you.
/r/MensRights23/07/17 12:20 PM
1

Idk man, the US has way way WAY more prisoners per capita than any other country on Earth, harsher punishments and it seems huge police powers. The impression I get is that of a police state frankly. Not doubting your experiences but they just don't add up to the numbers for them to be a national trend.
/r/MensRights21/07/17 07:35 PM
1

I don't believe that is what the population wants, that's a pretty extraordinary statement that requires pretty strong evidence to believe. Perhaps you live in an anarchist bubble or something. Also a just world is not one where the majority gets every wish fulfilled. Human rights of all superseed that, otherwise "all gays and atheists should be killed!" would have become a reality in the west not too long ago and would become one now in many places. Slavery in Southern US can be another example…
/r/MensRights21/07/17 10:51 AM
1

I'll survive just fine when it happens. To hell with everyone that's too weak and frail to do the same right?
/r/MensRights21/07/17 09:08 AM
2

So you're telling me (and most of the commentators, it seems) it's an injustice when a man is forced to support an unwanted child but when it happens to a woman it's all good? The problem is the legal and societal double standard due to women having the choice to abort and men not offered a similar choice financially, not comments outraged at someone's injustice.
/r/TheRedPill17/07/17 11:38 PM
3

There are those confused about what feminism actually is
/r/MensRights05/07/17 01:06 PM
1

Again I have to point out the rest of the civilised world does not have the American 'put them away and throw away the key' mentality. If rehabilitation is the main goal sentence is fair.
/r/MensRights04/07/17 01:42 PM
5

Yes, so the origin is related to humans not men then why change it? It's similar in Latin languages as well even if the word for man is a different one. It's not some sexist thing
/r/MensRights24/06/17 07:17 PM
1

You can't get more softspoken than Hoff Summers
/r/MensRights24/06/17 12:08 PM
13

Homicide means killing a human, not a man
/r/MensRights24/06/17 11:58 AM
1

The whole forced living in the ex's house always blows my mind. What if he sells it, will she be evicted then?
/r/MensRights24/06/17 09:06 AM
31

On CNN I heard one of the supposed victims say tgat only 2% of rapists spend a day in jail and this has to change now. Feminist statistics everyone!
/r/MensRights17/06/17 05:55 PM
2

I think you should remove his comment / warn him or even outright ban him though. I am not one for light bans but trying to get people to leave over nothing seems like too much
/r/MensRights16/06/17 09:04 AM
15

I hope you can see how many issues including the last two listed there don't get resolved ot get worse because of feminism.
/r/MensRights16/06/17 09:01 AM
-7

No she doesnt. That's just your bias from knowing the story
/r/MensRights15/06/17 12:07 AM
2

It doesn't happen officially but can be tolerated - we were talking about unofficial privately enforced law as you rightly pointed out. While travelling in Morocco I heard of a family killing a girl for being in love in neighbouring moderate Tunisia, with no consequences, police turning a blind eye/supporting it. My moroccan host was telling me there is still actual old school slavery in part of the country (western sahara if I'm not mistaken) which would not be surprising considering neighborin…
/r/MensRights14/06/17 11:26 AM
1

It does happen in moderate muslim countries quite a bit. I like how you conveniently passed over female genital mutilation which happens quite a bit in western nations as well. Lol dungeons and dragons, nice trolling
/r/MensRights14/06/17 12:06 AM
2

Yes. For one there should not be two sets of laws in one country. And private religious rules don't give you the right to kill other citizens for apostasy or for sex outside marriage, or do female genital mutilation (yes I know its legal for boys but two wrongs don't make a right) which is in some interpretations of sharia. Also in practice it is anything but consensual, more like huge cultural pressure put especially on women. You want to see a real patriarchy? Look no further than most Islamic…
/r/MensRights13/06/17 06:04 PM
3

Well the former is arguably mkre idiotic because most of the population woild be imprisoned if those people had their way. It's a close context though
/r/MensRights13/06/17 05:56 PM
5

It is right to protest it as there are constant attempts to introduce it in muslim communities, with support from prominent, mainstream feminists - one of the woman march's organizers in fact. It's always harder to get rid of a nasty thing after it is implemented. I think that's already happened in the UK years ago, not entirely sure however.
/r/MensRights13/06/17 08:54 AM
10

There are people out there that believe when drunk people have sex they are raping each other. Let that sink in.
/r/MensRights13/06/17 08:38 AM
2

It's really dumb because ppl could post on those subs arguing, being in agreement with TwoX ideas and still be banned
/r/MensRights12/06/17 10:10 AM
5

You know someone should put up stickers saying whites instead of women on these billboards, then sit back and watch all hell break loose :))
/r/MensRights12/06/17 10:08 AM
1

Banning ppl just from posting in some places is bad enough though
/r/MensRights12/06/17 09:48 AM
0

No, you can't say lack of humanitarian aid to foreign countries amounts to human rights abuse. If that were the case I am abusing people all over the world by not donating
/r/MensRights12/06/17 09:31 AM
2

You know it is possible to want to hurt someone badly but not kill them
/r/PussyPassDenied15/05/17 12:42 PM
3

Pretty hard to imagine the south would still have slaves in 2017 even if they won though.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/05/17 12:01 PM
24

I'll take the fourth amendment for $35 please. Also the right to affordable healthcare is considered a basic human right in the rest of the developed world.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/05/17 11:19 AM
13

Her statement was stupidly out of context but not exactly false
/r/PussyPassDenied12/05/17 11:17 AM
1

To be fair it said she was ghe primary caretaker too which a single father could have used as a defense as well
/r/PussyPassDenied12/05/17 11:14 AM
6

I think he would get the same, this is in the UK where the sentences are much much lighter than in the US. And I don't think it was attempted murder either but that's just my opinion.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/05/17 10:57 AM
4

Well not rulling it out completely but someone that just runs over a random person is a good degree of crazy
/r/PussyPassDenied12/05/17 09:55 AM
1

I was just saying the UK has much lighter sentences in general than the US, so even with gender disparities I doubt a man would get more in this case; sure I could be wrong just my opinion. Have a good day as well
/r/MensRights11/05/17 09:45 PM
1

Yeah and like I said I am well aware of sentencing disparities I just don't think it applies in this case; not sure why we have to repeat the same arguments. Thank you for the gratuitous insult anyway.
/r/MensRights11/05/17 09:34 PM
1

Not every country wants to keep 1% of their population imprisoned like the US. Even if she gets out earlier I think it's enough to not want to do it again and I think a man would have gotten the same in the UK. Edit: yeah it sucks she lied and made up stuff but most people do the same trying to avoid prison. It's full of "innocents" after all.
/r/MensRights11/05/17 08:25 PM
9

Chipping away our freedoms one thought crime at a time :(
/r/MensRights11/05/17 08:16 PM
1

I know about the sentencing disparity and agree it's a problem. But I don't feel it's the case in this specific situation that is why I asked for specific reversed genders examples. I don't think it's attempted murder either, if she wanted to kill him she could have easily. She wanted to hurt him but not kill him imo and the sentencing seems fair to me so even if there would be a disparity it should be corrected by reducing mens' sentences not increasing women's. What do you want, 10 years? How …
/r/MensRights11/05/17 08:03 PM
6

Yeah there is just no way someone can be in the same car with their ex without having sex with them. Nobody in the history of the world has stayed friends with their ex!
/r/MensRights11/05/17 07:27 AM
0

If you have evidence from the UK that says otherwise by all means share.
/r/MensRights11/05/17 07:24 AM
-4

Woman behaves badly, has justice served. /r/mensrights is outraged. Wonderful, I wonder why some people don't take mens rights seriously.
/r/MensRights11/05/17 07:21 AM
6

So we are all supposed to believe the patriarchy because feminism says so. Hold your yawn. Ok for argument's sake let's say it exists and it hurts both genders. But as you can see from the OP and many other instances like shorter prison sentences for te same crime etc., feminism that truly matters (powerful organizations and individuals that actually influence laws and society) fights for advantages that women have at the expense of men, even fighting to expand them and create new ones. Is it fa…
/r/MensRights10/05/17 08:31 AM
9

ISN'T LIFE ALTERING TRAUMA FUN!!!
/r/MensRights10/05/17 08:01 AM
1

Is it really? I'd wager for most people it's not, only for sjw types
/r/PussyPassDenied27/04/17 03:12 PM
14

You know the problem with all that? I don't trust you to decide who is a nazi and "deserves" to get beat down. To a growing number of people being against feminism or sjw doctrine makes you one for example. Don't think there are more than 2 genders? Nazi. People shouldn't go to jail for not calling someone's special gender pronoun? Nazi. It never ends; it is a botomless pit. It has to be for groups that need an ubiquitous enemy to exist in order for them to gain power through fear and violence.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/04/17 10:06 AM
-2

Why are they literally doing nazi symbolism like the hitler salute / expressions then?
/r/PussyPassDenied18/04/17 09:57 AM
30

Are you really equating being anti feminist / anti sjw with alt right? Hillarious. Guess it's one way to never question your beliefs or ponder an argument, say to yourself it comes from a nazi and disregard it.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/04/17 09:42 AM
0

He is not. He is saying it's a possibility which of course it is. Assuming would be if he believed he was still guilty.
/r/MensRights17/04/17 04:07 PM
2

It's because they believe women suffering is so much more important, the men's should ve dealt with once all the sufferings of women are gone (which means never, of course)
/r/MensRights17/04/17 01:23 PM
1

He is just listing the possibilities, not assigning degrees of probabilities to it. I swear people on this sub like to wear horse glasses as much as feminists sometimes.
/r/MensRights17/04/17 01:11 PM
3

I would say that is an example of rape subculture, present here and there, just like there are racist communities here and there. The term rape culture implies the main opinion in a society is supporting of rape, which is why the use of rape culture is very misleading.
/r/MensRights17/04/17 01:04 PM
10

He doesn't have to use full force you know; he could just use an equal force to yours when hitting you back. The main thing though with violence is physical damage can be much less than psychological or emotional damage, from which the physically stronger person is not magically exempted by being male.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/04/17 11:13 AM
2

You're missing the point. Genital mutilation should simply not be a choice. If you had a daughter and they asked if they could nip the clit a bit, would you be ok with that?
/r/MensRights12/03/17 12:59 PM
1

Sure you can decide to put less force into it.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/03/17 10:20 AM
1

2% is a fair summary of the studies of provably false allegations This is the important bit. But feminists always neglect to mention it's part of a wider circle which includes the others that are false but there isn't enough evidence or will to prosecute; or that it's factually impossible to ever know the true number I'm not using always lightly, I never have seen a feminist admit to those things.
/r/MensRights02/03/17 03:57 PM
1

I'm not assuming, I'm just saying it's possible, or even probable if you have a system that's design to rehabilitate more than to punish/take revenge; the US has a huge problem with it. But all that wouldn't matter if they'll never get out I'm sorry about your experience, I understand what you're saying - but perhaps in 10 years time you will have gotten over the desire for your assailants to still suffer. Even if you never get over it I don't think that should be the main factor in determining …
/r/MensRights02/03/17 03:41 PM
7

If that's the punishment for an accusation she should have been expelled too
/r/MensRights02/03/17 01:37 PM
-2

So you are saying you don't want justice but hate and revenge. If they change for better in all those years however you will hate someone that doesn't exist anymore and still punish them. You think someone somewhere will be better off somehow or happier if they stay for life - but who? But that method has been and is being tried so much throughout history, not really leading to healthy happy societies. See US - throw as many people in prison for as long as possible, the only thing it does is fee…
/r/MensRights02/03/17 01:29 PM
3

Do you think murder is a worse crime than what they did? If it is then it should have a worse punishment Plus let's say one of them is a changed person after 6 years and not a danger to society anymore or even becomes a good person that wants to contribute positive things. Keeping him or her for life only becomes a huge injustice then.
/r/MensRights02/03/17 11:02 AM
4

It is more than priests to blame though. At its core the catholic doctrine is at fault with its celibacy principle. If you repress the strongest natural urges you're gonna have a bad time
/r/MensRights02/03/17 10:27 AM
3

Atheist here - what are you on about? What does atheism have to do with pedophilia - that makes no sense to me Only thing that comes to mind is the catholic church protecting thousands of active child rapists which frankly should be everyone's concern
/r/MensRights02/03/17 10:23 AM
1

Why should a grave assault be punished as severely as murder? You are saying there is no difference between them if you do
/r/MensRights02/03/17 10:19 AM
-3

Except there are no killers here. Why should a grave assault be punished as severely as murder? You are saying there is no difference between them if you do
/r/MensRights02/03/17 10:18 AM
8

Critical thinking seems to have become a defect rather than a trait lately. Maybe I am paranoid but I'm afraid humanity's infinite reserves of stupidity and hatred will lead to a global catastrophy in our lifetimes. It would be nothing new after all.
/r/MensRights02/03/17 10:15 AM
4

I disagree. You shouldn't have life imprisonment for every violent crime. They seem appropriate to me
/r/MensRights02/03/17 10:10 AM
36

They can be ruthless to other people, not just women.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/03/17 09:15 AM
3

While you could have a good point I think it doesn't matter so much what most individuals believe on one side or another compared to the actions of the powers that represent them. With feminist groups sorry to say its not looking good
/r/MensRights25/02/17 03:55 AM
1

Telling that I had to scroll this much down to find a story of a mab hitting back
/r/MensRights25/02/17 03:40 AM
3

You must not be aware of things like the Duluth Model or lack of resources for abused men
/r/MensRights25/02/17 03:22 AM
1

Well now you're just being facetious and condescending. This is why people dislike feminists(m). When shown the hateful stuff feminism does it's "they're not real feminists" when prodded deeper it turns into "we're just diverse, all good" And my personal favorite, the dictionary definition. Because movements wouldn't do anything outside the definition, it's like dictionaries are able to cast spells to keep them there. Wonderful.
/r/MensRights25/02/17 02:24 AM
1

I apreciate the sentiment but as there is no objective definition of feminism I will believe those that proclaim it, especially the ones with lobbying power like the big organisations. I don't want to dwelve too much into the no true scotsman thing but if you will answer me this question that's been bugging me: If feminism is so diverse it can mean many entirely different, even opposing things, can it still be a meaningful ideology?
/r/MensRights24/02/17 09:28 PM
36

Too bad they support the duluth model (basically arrest the man no matter what at a domestic abuse call) and actively fight the opening of male victims shelters or deny the reality of domestic violence being equal. It is like all those feminist lobbies/public figures are invisible
/r/MensRights24/02/17 03:24 PM
14

So now racism does not have to include race. Lmao OK. Sorry you think everyone who disagrees with your changed meaning is an idiot. Now here is the problem with your definition: race is an uncontrollable trait while Islam is a set of ideas. What is happening with your definition is people being attacked for criticizing ideas or their perceived consequences which is a dangerous thing. It also widens the concept of racism so much it's becoming more and more meaningless. It gets thrown around all t…
/r/PussyPassDenied24/02/17 07:28 AM
1

Are you aware your scottish friend ia not truly a scottsman? He did something bad a while ago.
/r/MensRights18/02/17 12:01 PM
1

Yeah well you missed the agains their will part it seems.
/r/MensRights18/02/17 11:48 AM
1

I understand but two injustices are not better than one un my opinion. So forcing moterhood too doesn't help
/r/MensRights17/02/17 08:50 PM
1

The issue is not Trump grabbing pussies. The issue is he didn't wait for consent. 'I don't even wait' = sexual assault.
/r/MensRights17/02/17 12:16 PM
1

I wouldn't call a few medium sized youtubers a movement. I watch them for entertainment mostly but I don't see how it translates to anything politically. Republicans are doubling down on science denying and corporate shiling and Trump is a massive fraud imo. He is 'draining the swamp' by putting a Goldman Sachs man as head of the treasury and removing regulations put in place after wall street crashed the world economy. Get ready for Crash 2.0, bigger and stronger. Imo the new justice democrats …
/r/MensRights17/02/17 11:56 AM
1

She didnt give consent to have a child. 2 injustices instead of one is not how I would go about equality. More importantly banning abortions doesn't decrease their number only leads to horror stories. Look at all the places where it os or has been banned.
/r/MensRights17/02/17 11:31 AM
16

Hear, hear. Irrirating how often people use bad arguments for something even if it's correct. There are many ways to prove easily that feminism is a hate movement fighting for women's supremacy even if many individual feminists don't
/r/MensRights16/02/17 09:22 AM
1

Hows that?
/r/MensRights16/02/17 08:45 AM
1

It's a very different kind of unwillingness and you know it. They're not in your body feeding of it without your consent.
/r/MensRights16/02/17 12:02 AM
1

The point where it doesn't depend on someone for survival if it's against their will
/r/MensRights15/02/17 06:30 PM
4

Because they don't need to use anol unwilling person and their resources to survive
/r/MensRights15/02/17 06:29 PM
12

Still those possible punishments are horrible. 350 years? War criminals or people that do genocides don't get that much, in fact many never even get charged.
/r/MensRights15/02/17 06:21 PM
6

It's 3% of what they do, look it up. There should be a link above
/r/PussyPassDenied13/02/17 06:49 PM
1

How do we know this is perjury? Easy if she had actually been "abused" by her ex-husband for years that fact would have been front and center in the initial trial. While we can think that and be correct, you can't really think that's enough evidence to convict someone of perjury. That would be absurd.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/02/17 11:37 PM
13

It is not. With all the non stop republican propaganda against it, you better believe the govt watches every cent. Abortions are just 3% of what PP does anyway, and it has more than enough funds from non-federal sources for that little. What will be defunded sadly will be the tratment of STDs, contraceptions, many other medical procedures.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/02/17 11:34 PM
4

It's impossible to prove it was perjury
/r/PussyPassDenied08/02/17 11:16 AM
20

PP doesn't use tax dollars to pay for abortions, that's already been in the law and watched carefully for years
/r/PussyPassDenied08/02/17 11:15 AM
7

You think you would spot possible future brain damage from a video? Cmon
/r/PussyPassDenied08/02/17 10:54 AM
6

It's a traumatic event for the baby as it is very painful, a lot of them are done without anesthesia around 50% if I recall right, as that always carries some risk. Now it's been proven early life trauma can lead to life long psychological issues, so those episodes of stress/anger/depression/anxiety/whatever could be caused or amplified by this trauma and you'd never ever suspect it. (on mobile so you'll have to trust me or look the science up yourself) Not to mention those cases where severe da…
/r/MensRights07/02/17 01:53 AM
11

It's Poe's law, we never can know. But I'm sure at least some people would believe anything, SRS started as over the top trolls after all before the masses joined and started believing the trolling
/r/MensRights22/01/17 03:41 PM
1

I'm not claiming she is lying. She may well be telling the truth from what I'm concerned. I'm saying someone's testimony should NOT be sufficient evidence to convict, especially when there is a big incentive to lie. Are you honestly confident a system where a judge only needs to believe one side of "he says, she says" can be one without a huge number of wrongful judgements? Add to that how women know they just need to make up a story and if believed win big money, if disbelieved nothing will hap…
/r/MensRights22/01/17 12:34 PM
4

And you got downvoted for that? This sub has really lost it lol
/r/MensRights21/01/17 10:41 PM
1

What evidence? If there was any objective evidence it would probably be mentioned in the article, or somewhere else. Judges can be biased too and in a civil case like this it can often be "I believe this party more than the opposing party"
/r/MensRights21/01/17 03:11 PM
1

You are calling them rapists but I am not, as I see no reason to. I've seen no evidence at all nor read what that might be besides her testimony, if you have please share. In fact in this sort of case it's really hard to get evidence but video or even witnesses, unreliable as they are would be better than nothing. Otherwise there is simply no way to know how drunk she was and how drunk the men were. What if the guys were drunker than her, does that mean she raped them? Makes no sense. Can you no…
/r/MensRights19/01/17 12:16 AM
1

What evidence? Her testimony? If there was real, hard evidence the Crown would have prosecuted criminally
/r/MensRights18/01/17 10:42 AM
3

What evidence? Her testimony? If there was real, hard evidence the Crown would have prosecuted criminally
/r/MensRights18/01/17 10:41 AM
1

I just hate the word myself
/r/MensRights21/12/16 03:11 AM
2

I just want to point out drunk does not mean incapacitated in most cases - this is the red herring the sort of people that made this poster go for. Sorry about your shitty experience, glad you're over it
/r/PussyPass04/11/16 11:10 AM
1

I know courts are biased, but does the law specifically say drunk women can't consent? If so, where, the whole US or some states? I know California has the active consent bs going on
/r/PussyPass04/11/16 11:07 AM
1

There was one in Israel were a palestinian man was convicted of rape because he lied about being jewish
/r/MensRights24/10/16 12:13 PM
8

For a different kind of indoctrination altogether.
/r/TheRedPill15/10/16 04:54 PM
6

That's hard to do when feminism actively opposes men's rights in many cases
/r/MensRights15/10/16 04:19 PM
1

Wow they sound like oversensitive children
/r/MensRights02/10/16 07:32 PM
1

Please paste the transcript, I have the feeling it will be amusing.
/r/MensRights02/10/16 04:59 PM
47

It can't be legal for the police to force you back home can it? You are allowed to leave it whenever you like
/r/MensRights24/09/16 11:16 AM
-1

You are being downvoted for making a point on reading statistics, so disgraceful
/r/MensRights30/08/16 07:06 PM
14

Interesting how only the males are the ones required to constantly wonder if there is still consent during sex and only the females could potentially be harmed. I guess women are more fragile and need to be protected by men. Thanks for that insight!
/r/MensRights27/07/16 11:22 AM
1

y
/r/MensRights19/02/16 11:00 PM
3

Youll never know for sure but do you want every girl or woman to have the power to fuck someone's life up on a whim?
/r/MensRights20/01/16 10:54 PM
5

Plus men freezing like rape victims often do. Or being conditioned / peer pressured not to oppose it
/r/MensRights28/11/15 12:05 AM
1

Here I'll give it a go: It's patriarchal beliefs that women are ultra-sensitive and need so much more protection than men
/r/MensRights08/08/15 12:06 AM
1

It was entrapment, read the below comment
/r/PussyPassDenied08/06/15 01:03 PM
5

I don't know, I'm seeing A LOT of what I'd call radical feminists in reverse here lately.
/r/MensRights01/05/15 11:26 PM
11

I stopped believing in the wage gap once I found I out I You shouldn't though. Your beliefs should form in relation to scientific evidencce like studies and statistcal analysys (which there is plenty of regarding the wage gap) not personal experience. That's the whole problem with the wage gap's perception.
/r/MensRights30/04/15 03:35 AM
0

No, you shouldn't have the right to decide what people can wear in public. That's downright tyrannical. The fact that you're disgusted by someone else's body is your problem. You are the one creating those feelings inside you.
/r/MensRights29/04/15 06:16 PM
1

lol downvotes - this sub is becoming SRS in reverse. I guess part of the reason so few people take the MRM seriously
/r/MensRights29/04/15 02:19 PM
-1

Or maybe people should juts be able to enjoy the sun and the sea in peace without having to be judged for it
/r/MensRights29/04/15 02:17 PM
1

Anyone have an English version?
/r/MensRights29/04/15 12:33 AM
-7

It's different. The feminists are saying it's not OK to put pressure on people to look a certain way in order to go to the beach. The beach should be enjoyed by everyone, no matter what their bodies look like. And I agree with them. The islamists are raving about the way those women are dressed. The article's implication that feminists made a fuss about too much skin is not backed up by any evidence; to the contrary, the two women protesting the ad were as scantily clad as the poster girl.
/r/MensRights29/04/15 12:30 AM
2

He was only answering /u/Capitalsman question. Jesus.
/r/MensRights27/04/15 06:35 PM
-2

Give a human a little power FTFY
/r/MensRights27/04/15 05:14 PM
1

I am not 100% on this but I think chess does involve physical prowess, as far as I remember the difference is men can keep a high level of concentration for a longer time. If anyone has knowledge in this area, please comment.
/r/MensRights21/04/15 08:50 AM
19

Sometimes I think the world is just one big Poe's law testing ground.
/r/MensRights25/03/15 03:06 PM
-1

woosh?
/r/MensRights22/03/15 01:19 PM
2

About this issue, I've heard the counter argument that it is still illegal for women to give up her baby against the wishes of the father and could face kidnapping charges and so on. I'm also not clear that fathers abandoning a baby under those laws would be prosecuted. Can anyone clear those up?
/r/MensRights22/03/15 11:31 AM
4

I've stopped drinking. I grew up a little Good. There are good parts and something to grow on in any situation, you can focus on that and take it as an opportunity to develop yourself.
/r/MensRights22/03/15 11:24 AM
0

A physical attack can affect your ethos the same way a rape can
/r/MensRights22/03/15 11:13 AM
2

I don't know if there's enough in the article to believe that's what happened. It's just one interviewed student who is obviously biased in the case and may exaggerate in reporting his actions. I primarily take issue with the notion that disputing a statistic that's been proven bogus and by disputing a claim about rape culture women and rape victims feel "unsafe" as if they were threatened and that's reason enough to ban a dissenting opinion. The whole article gave me the impression that mostly …
/r/MensRights20/03/15 12:35 PM
3

May I ask where in the article you got that from? All I got was that he questioned the bogus stats and existence of rape culture, which made some students uncomfortable.
/r/MensRights20/03/15 04:27 AM
5

Feminism hurts women too!
/r/MensRights13/03/15 04:28 PM
1

They need it too of course and usually they get it. I'm saying criminals need it most because they are suffering the most if they do violent crimes in the first place and because nobody gives it to them, I imagine. If you think about it we're not empathizing with other beings (animals too) according to their need but we're always judging first to see if they "deserve it" - I think we can do better.
/r/PussyPass03/03/15 10:53 AM
1

They are probably the ones that need it most.
/r/PussyPass02/03/15 04:35 PM
1

How does that premise (a debatable one in any case) justify drafting men now? Pre-emptive drafting for an extremely unlikely event
/r/MensRights25/02/15 12:52 PM
5

To me that begs the question: If people don't want to join the army voluntarily, is it moral to force them? We can go further and ask if they're not interested in a stronger or bigger army why should the state force them into it?
/r/MensRights25/02/15 02:22 AM
3

Just being a member of NATO is doing that for Lithuania, no need to force people into the army
/r/MensRights25/02/15 02:17 AM
16

The only one doing it right. I don't think forcing everyone to serve the state for 19 months is right; but it is less discriminatory than the other cases
/r/MensRights25/02/15 02:16 AM
1

It's even worse than that, in one case they tortured a handicapped person they knew was innocent to get information from his family, which they suspected of terrorism. You can't argue with people like that though
/r/MensRights24/12/14 06:21 PM
1

-100st world problems
/r/MensRights14/11/14 11:48 AM
2

If we admit to biological and cultural differences regarding men and women then we should admit that sometimes there is a need to cater to a particular gender. The discrimination only appears when the funds going to programs for a particular gender heavily outweigh the funds for the other gender.
/r/MensRights31/07/14 12:56 PM
11

They could always make deals / leniency to people that come forward and confess a false testimony. It could even be put into law. All in all I kind of doubt many false accusers want to come forward later - if they had that kind of conscience they wouldn't have done it in the first place
/r/MensRights14/07/14 11:08 PM
10

I love how she has no problems admitting it's sexist - but it must be the good kind of sexism. Points for honesty I guess.
/r/MensRights27/04/14 03:40 PM
0

It's not discounting them in my view, it's telling him there's no need to be overwhelmed by some emotion caused by a simple joke. Don't take life so seriously - that kind of thing
/r/MensRights07/04/14 10:00 AM
6

I would
/r/MensRights06/04/14 11:22 PM
1

Thanks for the explanation. I think this format might be a good idea but with less trivial news stories, or people could confuse this for a tabloid. Just my 2 c :)
/r/MensRights08/01/14 05:29 PM
2

Ah ok thanks. Honestly I don't like what this sub is becoming if this kind of thing gets stickied
/r/MensRights08/01/14 11:11 AM
2

I have no idea what this title is saying and am not going to read the contents because i presume it only gets worse in there. Just saying :)
/r/MensRights08/01/14 10:08 AM
1

pfft....those are just mansplaining biotruths!
/r/MensRights31/12/13 11:04 PM
-1

Confusing jerks with confident people.
/r/MensRights28/11/13 08:42 AM
7

Not really. The high road in this case would have been to not let yourself be affected at all.
/r/MensRights28/11/13 08:39 AM
-1

Do a kickstarter for attorney fees/support if you run out of money
/r/MensRights02/11/13 10:23 AM
2

To be honest I'm not entirely sure what to make of this post. Are you trolling or a 13 yr old on steroids? You just went on a ramble on a totally different subject than what we were talking about. I was disputing your assertion that the government put up that poster and you rant how it's about consent about kissing? Wtf? Also I asked you to show me the legal statues on kissing without asking and I received some "AHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAA" and "HA! HA! HA!" Please try to formulate a response proving you…
/r/MensRights17/10/13 02:01 PM
2

It's right there on the poster. No, it's not. Nowhere does it say the government put up the poster you are just assuming that. An university is also not the government unless they are directly run by the sate, without independence. If I put a poster saying "kill all redditors" are you going to say the government wants to kill you? This is the kind of logic you're using. If kissing occurs without explicit verbal consent, kissers may face charges of sexual assault or worse - enforced by the govern…
/r/MensRights17/10/13 11:39 AM
3

I would call it authoritarian. Not every authoritarian thing is fascist and not every fascist thing is authoritarian. Why don't you call it communist as well, that's also authoritarian. Words convey meaning and mixing everything up together just confuses everything. All that said, where is the government regulating and criminalizing kissing? I feel this is going off the rails fast.
/r/MensRights17/10/13 11:08 AM
3

I agree for the most part but am not happy with your use of fascism. Fascism has nothing to do with this kind of thing, kind of makes everything else sound ridiculous. No offense.
/r/MensRights17/10/13 08:58 AM
12

It's not reasonable because there is no magic button you push to determine who falsely accused and who "clearly did it" - but not clearly enough to be convicted in court. Who would you trust to assess if you're guilty of a crime besides a court? The policeman? CPS? A prosecutor? The courts are there precisely to protect against those people being over zealous or too biased. If you also make them judge and jury you're going to see the real meaning behind the phrase "there is no justice"
/r/MensRights25/09/13 10:48 AM
13

So you base taking children away from their fathers on criminals being stupid enough to... post about their crimes on facebook? Did I get this right?
/r/MensRights25/09/13 10:25 AM
23

the proposed law stted that the had to be clear and convincing evidence that a rape occurred. Well what's the point in having a court system if you're just going to circumvent it, even when it finds someone not guilty? Whomever decides what clear and convincing evidence is, it won't be the courts. if it is ever proven that the law was abused for the benefit of the woman to deny and punish a man that indeed did not rape her, that she loses all custody of the child for life [...] Proven how and wh…
/r/MensRights25/09/13 09:10 AM
1

I'm curious, could you link to that discussion please?
/r/MensRights23/09/13 11:11 AM
26

Making everything into rape - simple things such as people having sex while drunk trivializes it, because it makes it an everyday occurrence everyone has done at least once in their lives. It makes it lose importance in people's eyes.
/r/MensRights22/09/13 10:44 AM
2

I think the mods should put a [Misleading Title] edit. The title would be accurate only for a law that already passed, not some obscure proposal in its original form.
/r/MensRights18/09/13 10:45 PM
11

Revenge would have been not letting her jump on you in your place and kicking her out.
/r/seduction17/09/13 03:41 PM
1

Seems unlikely. Any sources on that?
/r/MensRights07/09/13 08:16 AM
2

The researchers weren't able to adjust for specialty, which is no small distinction where surgeons or radiologists earn significantly more than primary care providers. However, women account for more than half of the country’s pediatricians but fewer than 10% of orthopedic surgeons, according to data from the Association of American Medical Colleges. Read: the research is so poorly done it is useless, but let's bring up a strawman to distract attention from that without alluding to any reason wh…
/r/MensRights06/09/13 10:25 PM
1

Censorship is not a concept limited to government-run spaces, nor is it illegal in and of itself. Free speech rights only make sense when they go against majority's thinking, as it's often the only type of speech that needs protection. Also, you will be hard pressed on finding any subject that's not "content deemed objectionable by a sizeable minority of their patrons". I suppose baby and cat pictures fits the description, but that's about it.
/r/MensRights06/09/13 05:54 PM
6

Sarcasm is rarely caught in this sub, unfortunately.
/r/MensRights25/08/13 12:50 PM
6

Just want to say it's a very well written article. You'd do well to submit it to a bunch of places, mainstream and internet media and raise awareness on this
/r/MensRights23/08/13 10:09 AM
1

I wonder what the "mainstream" feminism doctrine is on this issue? I know there are a lot of social justice SRS-types like the ones that blastered Dr. Phil, but are those considered radfems or feminists in general?
/r/MensRights23/08/13 09:20 AM
1

Is this official military policy, one drink = can't consent? It would be really interesting if it were and a very good argument
/r/MensRights23/08/13 09:18 AM
-2

/r/comment_chains
/r/MensRights19/08/13 08:49 PM
1

Jeez, it's really not that complicated: there was a (now repealed) law that mandated any person regardless of gender to be released for good behavior. I'm sure there are men that benefited from that too, regardless the point is this case has zero to do with men's rights.
/r/MensRights17/08/13 02:20 PM
0

It wouldn't be an option like it wasn't an option here: It is mandatory Come on people, it's black and white in the law and article, it doesn't help anything if you turn men's rights into an ideology that refuses to change in face of evidence.
/r/MensRights16/08/13 12:31 PM
0

A murder committed by a woman is automatically a men's rights issues? What? Here I thought men's rights was about systemic discrimination, not crimes committed by a particular person.
/r/MensRights16/08/13 08:26 AM
0

It's not institutionalized discrimination, it's a former law which mandates a release for good behavior.
/r/MensRights16/08/13 08:25 AM
-9

Downvoted for not being a men's rights issue. OP please read the articles you link to
/r/MensRights15/08/13 08:11 PM
17

To me, it seems being expected to pay for a date by default is saying that women do men a favor by sitting at a table with them for a couple of hours Have some dignity and self-respect, have the attitude you're doing her a favor by dating. I guarantee you'll also have much better results. All that said, if you really enjoyed an evening and company there's nothing wrong with paying for everything if that's what you want.
/r/MensRights14/08/13 10:32 AM
6

I used to have a very feminist, white knight and AFC mindset. That started to change when I read some seduction materials, helped me slowly realize that women are not much better or more innocent than men and shouldn't be put on a pedestal. Then when I found this sub I found it very interesting and an eye opener, began to see many things I thought were 100% true (like the women never lie about rape thing) were fabrications and had a major change of opinion.
/r/MensRights14/08/13 09:15 AM
9

And at the same time, if the bio dad is found then it is right to make him pay even if he never acted like a father. Logic be damned.
/r/MensRights14/08/13 09:01 AM
11

Sometimes it feels the whole world is flying from reality
/r/MensRights14/08/13 08:47 AM
59

Wow, just wow. Monitor-breaking material right there. Patriarchy realllllllly went overboard this time, treating that poor woman like a helpless creature that needs handouts. I am sure feminists will address this injustice very soon.
/r/MensRights14/08/13 08:43 AM
0

Female attraction has a lot more to do with connecting at an emotional level than physical appearance, so the latter doesn't matter much at all, except for outliers.
/r/MensRights14/08/13 08:34 AM
13

creepypms may suck with the srs attitude but that message is cringey/creepy and belongs there. The guy should really refine his pickups
/r/MensRights07/08/13 08:08 AM
1

But you have saunas everywhere!
/r/MensRights05/08/13 08:26 AM
1

Correlation does not imply causality. You just listed some stuff you perceive society wants from men (which society? ALL of them? Also, is there a consensus to those opinions or are they just part of an ideology?) but that doesn't mean it's the only or even main cause of gender roles.
/r/MensRights25/07/13 08:26 PM
2

The roles genders are put in are almost completely socially constructed You are just repeating this statement without providing any evidence. I should repeat there is no scientific consensus / definitive proof of this being the case, at this point I'm considering it pure ideology. Can you tell me why you think that statement is true? if we were to accept gender roles, that would be the more credible response. It wouldn't. If nobody was advocating for the discrimination against men it wouldn't lo…
/r/MensRights25/07/13 03:25 PM
4

If the majority were claiming there was no salt in sea water you'd need as many reliable studies as you could get to convince them otherwise
/r/MensRights25/07/13 03:12 PM
2

I disagree with the existence of genders and gender roles. They are just social constructs. There really is no scientific consensus / proof of this being the case, it's just ideology. the idea that men are more discriminated against than women would not be empirically valid Why is there a need to play that kind of oppression olympics in the first place? And who says only the most discriminated category needs activism - that doesn't make any sense. Would you say "more women are beat up then raped…
/r/MensRights25/07/13 03:08 PM
1

You say you need this job, but what will really happen if you lose it? Will you die, will you be maimed, unable to experience life in some way? I think all you need is to shed the false needs you may have.
/r/MensRights15/07/13 09:08 PM
5

perhaps for smoking a joint at the wrong place, wrong time. Even if it was for something bad they've done, what's the point in torturing them?
/r/MensRights15/07/13 03:46 PM
-2

/r/PussyPass would like this
/r/MensRights13/07/13 06:09 PM
1

I'm sure there is a way to look at income brought by men's tennis vs women's tennis so we don't have to speculate. I'm sorry you think tennis isn't mainstream but you're wrong. Roger Federer was the world's 2nd highest paid athlete in 2012 at over $71 million. Men can be sex symbols too, for once.
/r/MensRights12/07/13 05:51 PM
3

I don't have the numbers but I'm quite sure men's tennis generates way more income at the same tourneys. If someone has them please provide :)
/r/MensRights12/07/13 04:21 PM
11

Sorry but that website is really badly done. I get 3 videos or audios playing at the same time automatically, overlapping each other, and don't know where to stop them except for 1 of them. Not exactly welcoming..
/r/MensRights11/07/13 09:36 AM
3

this all deserves /rape/comment_chains...I mean /r/comment_chains
/r/MensRights10/07/13 08:49 PM
6

Besides Shrekem's explanation, another problem is it actually creates a problem where there isn't/shouldn't be one. It generates an atmosphere where the most ridiculous and irrelevant offenses are pandered to. It's just completely ridiculous. It wastes a lot of time and money browsing the dictionaries to come up with the words then changing billions of official papers/wording, time and money which could surely be put to better use. Last but not least, it provokes government interference in one o…
/r/MensRights04/07/13 01:59 PM
23

I like that they kept manhole cover. Women shouldn't be associated with those dirty male jobs anyway.
/r/MensRights04/07/13 07:18 AM
2

I also want to ask you a question. Have you wondered why you are trying to define the MRM according to their stance on feminist issues instead of objectively analyzing their own issues? That doesn't seem like an impartial / scientific way to go about it.
/r/MensRights04/07/13 12:44 AM
1

I commend you for your views but I have to say if you make feminism (or any notion, for that matter) to mean thousands of things, often opposing each other then it loses all meaning. The practical and rational way to look at it is to see what feminism actually achieves in the real world, the way it shapes laws and opinions; that's the closest we can come to objectively defining it.
/r/MensRights28/06/13 08:31 AM
5

Feminist protests over this sentence incoming in 3...2...1... Let's just wait.
/r/MensRights28/06/13 08:05 AM
8

going for the long con
/r/MensRights27/06/13 08:08 AM
2

If the psychological mechanism is the same, why not compare them?
/r/MensRights27/06/13 07:49 AM
2

Anyone have a link to the article?
/r/MensRights19/06/13 10:01 PM
2

Haven't read the article, but the title is implying women are whores if they have sex, is that the case?
/r/MensRights16/06/13 10:29 AM
4

They just want more women in politics so they have more to sexually harass and comment on their tits and asses. It's clearly patriarchy.
/r/MensRights16/06/13 10:24 AM
14

That's not the point. The discrimination is that all forms of female circumcision are illegal, no matter how mild.
/r/MensRights07/06/13 06:17 AM
22

You are incorrect. There are several forms of female circumcision, some equivalent to male circumcision. All are illegal and severely frowned upon.
/r/MensRights07/06/13 06:05 AM
1

/r/atheism is not even close to /r/atheism. They just did a complete 180. Check it out.
/r/MensRights05/06/13 10:20 AM
1

People will just have to go back to watching television, where everything is true - the horror!
/r/MensRights26/05/13 01:26 AM
63

Any evidence this is real?
/r/MensRights25/05/13 02:10 PM
3

DV is not about strength, it's about forced domination / psychological abuse. If it was about strength alone there would be no abuse victims staying with their abuser after it happened once or twice.
/r/MensRights23/05/13 10:32 AM
6

Typical white knight women are delicate flowers that need protected mentality - so encouraged in society. I cringe whenever I remember I used to think like that..
/r/MensRights22/05/13 06:03 PM
14

I am far from a member of SRS but downvoted your submission because it has very little value pertaining to men's rights imo; it's pretty much the same quality of a meme or facebook screenshot and I don't want this sub to go that way. This post I downvoted for whining about votes with no evidence whatsoever of srs involvement.
/r/MensRights22/05/13 05:55 PM
3

why crazy? unmarried does not mean single
/r/MensRights20/05/13 07:18 PM
5

I've gotta say sometimes MRAs can be irrational too. In the linked thread a bunch are calling for the girl to be jailed, when she didn't in fact commit any criminal offense. Pointing that out gets you a downvote. Not the way to go really.
/r/MensRights11/05/13 11:13 PM
53

No opinions ever changed without being challenged
/r/MensRights11/05/13 11:05 PM
3

Well your mom managed to find the one issue of blatant discrimination against women that feminism doesn't fight. Tell her to call all major feminist organizations, the media etc. to put a stop to this at once!
/r/MensRights11/05/13 10:37 PM
3

Well ok then, but don't tell people read the bible or shut up about hell, as if reading it would likely lead to your conclusion
/r/MensRights08/05/13 10:54 PM
3

According to your interpretation which is a small minority towards this point.
/r/MensRights08/05/13 10:34 PM
6

God never claimed or said anything as far as I'm concerned, so we can agree on that one. It has always been people making the claim in his name.
/r/MensRights08/05/13 05:51 PM
5

A wise television persona once said "God loves you just the way you are." And when he doesn't like the way you are, he sends you to hell. With love.
/r/MensRights08/05/13 05:32 PM
6

You mean proof it's working when you can afford an expensive lawyer that will charge $1,000,000 and think of tracking down all evidence. Think how many poor motherfuckers that had public defenders are in jail for stuff they didn't do
/r/MensRights07/05/13 05:47 PM
0

Sorry if I sounded harsh, it just seemed to me like you were using that bible story as support for the principle that not punishing innocents should be the top priority. Regardless of my own opinion though I think you'll agree bringing religion into things tends to alienate people, one side or the other
/r/MensRights06/05/13 10:05 PM
1

While I agree with the general message and cotwa in general, I must offer this critique. From the article: The editorial's upshot -- that it is worth the risk of punishing some innocent students in order to nab more guilty ones -- turns on its head the long-settled consensus of civilized people that it is far more important to protect the innocent than to convict the guilty. This sentiment was most famously articulated by the celebrated English jurist William Blackstone, but its roots extend bac…
/r/MensRights06/05/13 06:31 PM
1

Exactly, they don't even need to do anything the repubs will gladly do it themselves
/r/MensRights26/04/13 12:27 PM
1

Yeah, there seems little hope there anyway and he pretty much gave up on that. Might as well not give the ex-wife money
/r/MensRights25/04/13 09:57 PM
1

You know OP, if I were you at this point I'd just not pay a couple of months, save every penny from your salary and emigrate somewhere, start a new life, let your ex deal with the situation for a change
/r/MensRights25/04/13 06:03 PM
0

You know OP, if I were you at this point I'd just not pay a couple of months, save every penny from your salary and emigrate somewhere, start a new life, let your ex deal with the situation for a change
/r/MensRights25/04/13 06:01 PM
0

You know OP, if I were you at this point I'd just not pay a couple of months, save every penny from your salary and emigrate somewhere, start a new life, let your ex deal with the situation for a change
/r/MensRights25/04/13 06:00 PM
6

Yeah, I think I would rather take not being allowed to vote than forcefully being taken in the most horrifying war humanity has ever seen with a great chance of dying and an almost-certain chance at lots of suffering and being permanently messed up if I did make it back
/r/MensRights21/04/13 11:05 PM
1

Or the morning after pill or abortion...but that's not what makes it so unbelievably stupid, it's seeing teenage girls as these completely rational creatures incapable of risking to harm themselves at all times. Mind blowing!
/r/MensRights21/04/13 09:01 AM
3

the female partner explicitly can't be charged under any circumstances on the basis that "girls don't rape because they run the risk of pregnancy." Oh.my.non-existent.God. That's taking stupidity to a whole new level right there.
/r/MensRights21/04/13 08:55 AM
5

...gone wild west?
/r/MensRights18/04/13 10:22 PM
1

It's just a brief hitch for Uncle Sam. It's like a walk in the park..
/r/MensRights18/04/13 10:11 PM
7

It's not creepy at all, it's confident. Women usually like this kind of confidence. Why the hell is it creepy to ask someone out? Sigh
/r/MensRights16/04/13 06:29 PM
16

Rather than criminalize it there should be fines and/or the elimination of child support for X months from the other party
/r/MensRights16/04/13 05:34 PM
2

AI isn't feminist enough to marginalize male victims of male rapists; it's probably feminist enough to ignore male victims of female rapists. That's what /u/Sir_Fulton stated in the first place. I asked for some links regarding AI and female-on-male rape, which you don't have either. Can't you just say that you don't know? You're only making wild assumptions at this point
/r/MensRights12/04/13 11:46 PM
0

He was replying to: Nice to see that Amnesty hasn't turned too feminist to give attention to this subject!
/r/MensRights12/04/13 06:33 PM
0

I think you got it wrong, he was talking about Amnesty International (or at least, that's what comes out if you read the parent comment). Your links don't say anything about AI
/r/MensRights12/04/13 06:18 PM
2

Are you implying there are no degrees to racism? Would you say someone being made fun of at school for being black was not experiencing racism?
/r/MensRights12/04/13 06:06 PM
1

Any links to such denials?
/r/MensRights12/04/13 05:31 PM
1

You could try to find a lawyer that would work for a percentage of a settlement and not pay anything yourself.
/r/MensRights12/04/13 05:09 PM
1

I for one think it's a bad thing to pander to the irrational. Here it is to the point parents are denied a natural, innocent, bonding experience with their children and enforcing some pretty sick ideas of sexuality
/r/MensRights11/04/13 09:19 AM
1

live and let live Kicking you out of a public place you brought your daughter to because of their religion is where the "live" part doesn't happen anymore, imo.
/r/MensRights11/04/13 09:15 AM
7

That sounds like all kids of fucked up And that has to be the unintentional pun of the year
/r/MensRights05/04/13 12:10 AM
3

I don't know why people make a big deal about virginity It's called religion
/r/MensRights01/04/13 10:39 PM
6

I could only make it through the first comment and the first paragraph of the second one. I shudder to think there are 97 of them.
/r/MensRights01/04/13 03:47 PM
3

I hope you post an update on how the meeting went
/r/MensRights30/03/13 01:02 PM
77

You messed up by not putting the second repetition in all caps. It would hold true then.
/r/MensRights28/03/13 10:34 PM
4

Yeah I read that in the article. I think that paragraph is very very wrong and really tramples on your freedoms. It literally means punishing thought crimes, which I find really scary.
/r/MensRights25/03/13 08:19 PM
10

There are already laws against those in pretty much every country. It normally has to be a credible threat or incitement. Not some dude rambling off to anonymous comments from anonymous people on youtube.
/r/MensRights25/03/13 07:58 PM
14

Is it okay that women people who try to contribute to the public debate are met by vicious, racist and/or sexual ad-hominem attacks that contribute nothing to the discussion? Yes, yes it is. The only speech that needs protection is speech the majority dislikes. That's what freedom of speech means.
/r/MensRights25/03/13 07:32 PM
-4

And 46 reports = up to 54 false claims not reported to the police
/r/MensRights22/03/13 03:02 PM
-1

Is this from wggesucht? Anyway if we're being honest women are harassed much more than men online, although it is rather stupid to make sure they only write that warning to females.
/r/MensRights16/03/13 01:24 PM
3

You are replying with arrogant smugness instead of addressing specific poitns, then you complain about the low quality of posters here. Interesting.
/r/MensRights12/03/13 12:39 PM
1

That reads like some puritan teaching from the Victorian Era. Just...wow.
/r/MensRights11/03/13 01:59 AM
-5

Absence of evidence is different than evidence of absence. EDIT: Don't understand the downvotes, could someone explain? I'd like to know what you found wrong in my logic
/r/MensRights26/02/13 04:11 PM
10

Except women can abandon their children after being born, without being expected to pay any child support, yet men can't. Is this not an obvious discrepancy?
/r/MensRights18/02/13 02:41 PM
0

I don't quite see the correlation. She can't stop having drunken one night stands when she enters a relationship? Not to mention that's not necessarily a problem for some relationships.
/r/seduction18/02/13 08:38 AM
2

So people in all the other countries that allow for this betray each other all the time? Even if so, what business is it of the government who I betray or not? I don't think the state should decide whether I do any test I choose to or whom I should tell, it's a clear infringement on personal freedom.
/r/MensRights14/02/13 12:51 AM
-2

You be the boss.
/r/MensRights11/02/13 12:09 PM
15

I honestly don't have a quarrel with that definition. It says typically against women, not exclusively against women. Even if you think this is not the case in the US&Canda (on which I couldn't pronounce), it is certainly true for the world as a whole.
/r/MensRights11/02/13 12:05 PM
0

I want to travel around, specifically don't want to stay where I am now, just stuck temporarily because of no money.
/r/TheRedPill11/02/13 08:30 AM
0

I'm not lying to anyone man, pointed out specifically that I didn't want this whole scenario
/r/TheRedPill11/02/13 08:26 AM
0

Don't want to stop talking to her as she's a really nice girl and this move has a lot of potential - precisely for focusing on what I want to achieve - which was never a monogamous thing anyway. Want to make her feel guilty about it and get there on my terms.
/r/TheRedPill09/02/13 11:23 PM
2

Yeah, short seems like a good idea. Now that I'm reading my message and post it sounds way more spiteful than I thought it would have. Guess I was letting off some steam without realizing it too :D
/r/TheRedPill09/02/13 11:19 PM
2

Alright let's improvise the message draft: Hey Derpina, I thought a bit about our last convo. I'm bored of all these serious speeches bullshit and so are you, but this is important - you need to realize some things. I am displeased with all the changes made since I last saw you. I accepted the thing about not trying to be a couple, hell that might even be for the best. But now you're telling me I should pretend to be this platonic friend and lie to people constantly ("so how did you two meet?"; …
/r/TheRedPill09/02/13 04:03 PM
0

What edit? None of my posts have the little star * that denotes an edit. You are a really poor troll at this point, goodbye.
/r/MensRights03/02/13 11:27 PM
0

A genetic deformity that makes us stronger, tougher, faster, and better at navigation, spatial recognition, driving , science and being leaders... some deformity. How is it my assertion? Or are you arguing that history proved men were better leaders than women, while still being horrendous leaders in general?
/r/MensRights03/02/13 09:59 PM
1

I would :D and also think it's funny now
/r/MensRights03/02/13 08:29 PM
2

All those names you mentioned and many others were good for themselves and their goals yet a veritable disaster for countless people, including in the end their own. Yes I can say they were effective, but effective at what kind of rule, and at what costs? Unless you want the type of mindless despotism that we've had for the majority of history as a desirable model for the present and future, then I don't see how you can use history to point out men are better rulers than women.
/r/MensRights03/02/13 06:57 PM
0

You were replying to a post that critiqued another post for saying men are better leaders and better at science, you said "can you provide proof that would negate so much history? didn't think so." Looks straight forward to me.
/r/MensRights03/02/13 06:47 PM
0

That is indeed the question to be asked firstly. For me it's the former clearly, unless you want to justify all kinds of genocides after the leader "inspires other to follow, achieves nontrival goals, and is effective about it"
/r/MensRights03/02/13 04:57 PM
6

You seem to be implying most leaders in history have been good leaders
/r/MensRights03/02/13 03:11 PM
8

Not even the best doctors in the world will ever have a 100%, injury free rate given enough procedures take place. The point is, any operation has its cases gone wrong and its fatalities, this will surely have some as well. It's a mathematical certainty. I'm calling them gratuitous because the procedure itself is, it's a social and traditional operation not a medical one.
/r/MensRights27/01/13 08:54 PM
10

I would wager that whether a medical procedure is necessary or not is an objective fact, based on medical science.
/r/MensRights27/01/13 08:39 PM
12

The difference is circumcision is gratuitous, rendering the injuries so as well.
/r/MensRights27/01/13 08:27 PM
1

That's just...the absurdity of it! I can only imagine what must go through someone's head, who hates or at least heavily dislike their former spouse, knowing that they can't cut her out of their life, they are forced to pay her even after death. I doubt Franz Kafka could have thought of such a scenario.
/r/MensRights15/01/13 08:08 PM
-7

Did they pay particular attention to little boys? I... I just couldn't resist.
/r/MensRights15/01/13 11:53 AM
5

The best out of that was $13,000 on clothes per month. The idea that if someone was married into richness they have to continue living there after the divorce just doesn't make any sense to me.
/r/MensRights14/01/13 07:56 PM
5

She also ordered McCain to keep his former spouse as a beneficiary of his life insurance policy and include her on his health, medical and dental plans. This is beyond ridiculous
/r/MensRights14/01/13 06:37 PM
6

Come to think of it, a dominatrix must've had a blast in those days
/r/MensRights14/01/13 06:11 PM
1

I'm sure this is the impression I'm getting...there is no one source, just general discussions on such cases. People living in Western societies often don't realize that they live in a bubble, albeit a big one. But attitudes, mentalities, moral values are vastly different throughout the world
/r/MensRights10/01/13 12:08 PM
1

I would draw the line at physical stuff where you can get real evidence and not try to criminalize emotional/verbal abuse, because you'd have to set a really low standard of evidence for that kind of law to be meaningful, which in turn opens it up to a tone of abuse via false accusations.
/r/MensRights09/01/13 04:24 PM
1

So, instead of assuming, let's be clear. How do you think a threat of something that may be a big emotional deal to someone changes their ability to consent, if at all? It can make them consent just to avoid the other thing, it can be emotional manipulation but I wouldn't call that rape. Look there are no absolutes here, it's a fine line to walk for sure and imo impossible to draw a line in the sand at a specific phrase/concept.
/r/MensRights09/01/13 04:11 PM
1

People actually think women who get raped are to blame? This is my impression for a large part of society, of course it's subjective and I could be wrong. The internet forums or comments sections discussing such cases are full of "if she didn't want it then why did she invite him to her place?" etc. There are no studies or such that I could cite you.
/r/MensRights09/01/13 02:23 PM
1

Are you really going to make a claim that under even a trivial review turns into all sex is rape? No, in fact I'm arguing against this type of thinking in another thread. I was trying to say that threats are not always clear-cut, and "I'll go watch porn" can be meaningless to someone and a big emotional deal to someone else. I didn't call this type of threat rape either, you're implying I did.
/r/MensRights09/01/13 02:21 PM
1

I agree, but the word "extremists" is redundant there
/r/MensRights09/01/13 11:53 AM
1

Way more than 2 stories. I was through about 10% of the comments last night and had already encountered a dozen or so. Seems to be unbelievably many.
/r/MensRights09/01/13 11:49 AM
2

I don't know about that, considering legislation and culture can be vastly different in Europe, within the EU and beyond, you'd almost need a subreddit for every country..
/r/MensRights09/01/13 11:46 AM
4

Did you just associate Nixon with reason and non violence?
/r/MensRights09/01/13 11:42 AM
1

They're not such a minority where I come from, which granted is not the UK. As for the concepts, there might be a difference between them, I just see it smaller than you do. Some people say she wanted it because she dressed like a slut, others she wanted it because she didn't fight hard enough.
/r/MensRights09/01/13 11:39 AM
1

The government always knows best.
/r/MensRights09/01/13 11:20 AM
1

thanks for the edits, they swung my vote for your post :D
/r/MensRights09/01/13 11:05 AM
1

Yes, but does it really matter? I agree with you it's a different form, but only the form differs. Victim blaming is the core of the issue - in this case, she didn't fight hard enough.
/r/MensRights09/01/13 11:01 AM
0

Why only physical violence? There's a lot of emotional manipulation one can do as well. As for your porn example, I don't see it that way. If the guy/girl that doesn't want sex doesn't care that the other looks at porn, it's fine but not a threat at all. A threat implies the person(s) you say it too will suffer some sort of damage if fulfilled. So the "I'll go watch porn" can become a threat if watching porn brings pain for their partner, in which case it's used to manipulate.
/r/MensRights09/01/13 09:56 AM
2

Not in the slightest. One is suggesting that a person is to blame for someone raping them, the other is suggesting they couldn't have been raped because the clothing they were wearing was too difficult to take off. The judges were saying that he couldn't have taken her jeans off had she resisted with all her strength. That's victim blaming to me. At any rate this poster campaign was in the UK, not Italy. If you want to focus on just the UK, fine, but you should have specified that in your reply …
/r/MensRights09/01/13 09:49 AM
1

Sure it is, the same rape apologizing stated differently.
/r/MensRights09/01/13 01:00 AM
2

[It was even Italy's highest appeals court!]http://www.independent.co.uk/news/women-in-jeans-cant-be-raped-1070301.html In its ruling, the court said: "It is common knowledge... that jeans cannot even be partly removed without the effective help of the person wearing them... and it is impossible if the victim is struggling with all her might."
/r/MensRights08/01/13 11:59 PM
8

Are you sure? Well I'm not a native English speaker but I've always thought I had a good grasp of it to be honest, and I can't think of a situation where I've heard it used to mean just persuasion.
/r/MensRights08/01/13 10:52 PM
19

How is it not? I think it fits the definition perfectly co·er·cion The practice of persuading someone to do something by using force or threats
/r/MensRights08/01/13 08:35 PM
9

The US is not the world though, a lot of people have those kinds of beliefs. Even in a western country, Italy, there was a judge that said a girl was at fault for being raped because she wore jeans. And whenever I looked at rape discussions on Romanian forums/internet I've encountered similar opinions. I can imagine there are much worse in patriarchal societies such as most muslim countries
/r/MensRights08/01/13 08:17 PM
9

I bet it is in many parts of the world
/r/MensRights08/01/13 08:14 PM
4

What is affirmed without evidence can be dismissed without evidence. It's not my job to prove your point for you, nor should it be.
/r/MensRights08/01/13 03:20 AM
2

As far as I knew, there was no established medical benefit to male circumcision. That article claims differently, so I'm asking, is the following true? And despite the risks, circumcision has several benefits. In August 2012, the American Academy of Pediatrics issued a revised policy statement, which outlines the advantages of circumcision. For one, there is a decreased risk of urinary tract infections within the first year of life. According to the American Academy of Pediatrics, the risk of a …
/r/MensRights08/01/13 01:53 AM
7

[citation needed]
/r/MensRights08/01/13 01:51 AM
0

Deadbeat father whose family is living in a $2.5 million house paid by him. Makes total sense.
/r/MensRights07/01/13 02:36 PM
11

Why is feminism pushing so hard for greater female representation in STEM fields Because there's a MASSIVE stigma against women who are good at math, science, etc. "Oh honey, this isn't the right field for you." Even if they're really good. while ignoring that the most dangerous and unpleasant jobs are overwhelmingly done by men? This is supply and demand. So one is discrimination, the other is a personal choice. What are you basing your view on? I'm detecting bias here. Why isn't it possible th…
/r/MensRights07/01/13 01:09 PM
6

I believe that's slang, not ignorance of English
/r/MensRights07/01/13 11:52 AM
1

Was just saying the message is bigoted, and pointing that out does not infringe on anyone's freedom of speech. I might also be overreacting a little.
/r/MensRights25/12/12 06:40 PM
2

How is your relationship with your mother / her side of the family now, if you don't mind me asking?
/r/MensRights25/12/12 08:58 AM
1

Freedom of speech is ok for me too, what does that have to do with calling a bigoted sign bigoted?
/r/MensRights25/12/12 08:45 AM
1

What about "don't trust jews", "don't trust gays", "don't trust whites/blacks/whatever" shirts?
/r/MensRights25/12/12 04:45 AM
2

congrats...better late than never
/r/MensRights23/12/12 12:13 AM
5

I will finally ask: what does the 5th law of robotics state?
/r/MensRights22/12/12 04:09 PM
15

Seriously? I'd rather not have sex
/r/MensRights20/12/12 07:57 PM
4

She did attempt it thoug, according to the link. Agree on the rest
/r/MensRights20/12/12 11:43 AM
1

The burden of proof needed in universities is lower than the one needed in criminal cases. Not sure but I think the same holds true for civil lawsuits. Now, a valid point to be made is that it's become too low in universities in the US (there was a thread here about a Dep. of Education decision on this a few days ago)
/r/MensRights11/12/12 05:28 PM
1

Why is the institution jumping the gun? I'd be willing to bet money that it's because of the first premise. I can't read their minds, not sure if it's that or they have the old 2% figure in mind that's been debunked but people still believe in it, or they simply found the girl believable because of the bruises and crying, thinking it's more than her word vs his word. Probably influenced by social opinions too. Whatever it is we won't make more justice by denying that most of the time rape accusa…
/r/MensRights11/12/12 04:39 PM
1

He's not been charged as a criminal and there is no intention to. The police don't believe him to be a criminal either. So..... why is he being suspended from the school by the administration? Then you shouldn't use legal terms like "charge" and "plea bargain" which imply criminal procedures have been under way. This was an administrative decision by the university not a legal system decision, and even here there was no plea bargain, that's all I was commenting on. If we accept the first premise…
/r/MensRights11/12/12 01:50 PM
0

OP: More often than not, the girl is telling the truth You: When OP posts something that basically accepts the word of a woman as truth How do you link the former to mean the latter, I don't know. More often than not simply means more than 50% of the time, with my understanding of English at least. He also stated repeatedly that the girl is lying in this case, so not sure how he's accepting her word. Since OP isn't fighting what they're accusing him of and accepting the plea bargain, he'll be an…
/r/MensRights11/12/12 01:26 PM
56

Why are you mad about this? Why is this even an issue? Why are you upset about laws that protect the safety of citizens? Are you mad because you cat-call men or women and they don't respond enthusiastically? I'm coming to realize: why are we even having this discussion? I'm not mad or upset about it, sorry but you are perhaps projecting there . I'm having a discussion. The reason I have issues with expanding the definition so widely, legally and morally, is that it's a great step towards an orwe…
/r/MensRights11/12/12 10:15 AM
-1

I've seen lots of studies floated around here that find women lying about rape to be 8-10% of cases. If you truly believe they lie more often than not, it would mean they lie in more than 50% of rape accusations.
/r/MensRights11/12/12 09:49 AM
69

Even if the caller means no harm and their only intention is to compliment me on my looks, it's uninvited and makes me feel unsafe. ...which is still not sexual assault. Because no sexual act is happening. By calling everything rape or sexual assault you diminish the value of real cases of it. If it were sexual assault it would also have to be illegal and have people arrested for whistling or making comments on someone's look. Think a little whether you would like to live in that society
/r/MensRights11/12/12 09:23 AM
1

Seriously, plenty of cities in Europe that aspiring musicians come and go all the time. Berlin is full of them for instance and life there is spectacular :)
/r/MensRights08/12/12 08:38 PM
3

Welcome to Feminism 1984
/r/MensRights07/12/12 07:32 AM
0

Sorry, somehow missed this reply. It maybe morally wrong according to you, but I don't see it as wrong enough to send someone to jail for 20 years or something like that, effectively ruining their life. The law should care about the effects of the teen not their parents. It's a fine line to walk, not a "throw everyone in jail forever" situation imo. I have a friend that taught highschool for a few months when he was 26. Most of the girls were hitting on him and he's had sex with a 15 yr old one.…
/r/MensRights07/12/12 07:01 AM
32

Yes, because the social imbalance is the MR issue, not your particular case.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 05:45 PM
1

I guess we can stop here and say we reached an irreconcilable difference. I think a person should never be forced to do something with their body against their will, no matter how moral I think it is. You beg to differ and there's not many arguments that I can come up to persuade you, since it's not about facts but about what rights we think people should have.
/r/MensRights04/12/12 08:22 PM
1

the instant he was born he was a living human being. Before that, yeah, he was just a fetus. I have a problem with this reasoning. 5 seconds before being born he's a fetus ten bang! human being, although no significant changes occurred during that time. It's not that simple.
/r/MensRights04/12/12 06:38 PM
1

They already consented at conception. TIL getting pregnant means having no rights to your body anymore. I guess pregnant women should be forbidden to commit suicide as well, since it would also kill the baby? Withdrawing that consent is like consenting to donate an organ, and then withdrawing your consent after it was transplanted. Not since that organ is in someone else's body now, and not yours legally anymore
/r/MensRights04/12/12 06:36 PM
2

If they feel the pain then they have consciousness by definition don't they? Perhaps a different type of consciousness that's not related to the mind and thinking about it. I'm a layman but it doesn't make sense for me otherwise. Do you have some science behind it or are you supposing like me?
/r/MensRights04/12/12 01:23 PM
2

It sounds obviously false, pain is suffering after all. Unless we are restricting suffering to mean only emotional pain, not sure why we should though. In your analogy the computer program is simulating pain rather than experience it, because it has no nerve receptors to do that.
/r/MensRights04/12/12 12:12 PM
1

Obviously it can NOT survive on it's own and somebody MUST move (a.k.a. moving ones body) to ensure the child's survival. Sure, but that someone is not forced into it but doing so of their own volition - be it a paid social worker, a volunteer for some organization/charity, adoptive parents etc. - this can't happen when the baby is inside the womb. That is where the difference lies in my opinion.
/r/MensRights04/12/12 11:50 AM
1

Are you sure that's true? As far as I know you can put the child up for adoption if you don't want to take care of it.
/r/MensRights04/12/12 11:31 AM
1

How does that relate to forcing someone's body into doing anything? Mutes can't order pizza on the telephone either, lots of handicapped people can't take care of themselves either. Maybe we should allow them to be killed too? It's the difference between voluntarily and forcibly supporting someone.
/r/MensRights04/12/12 11:25 AM
2

In Romania you can't voluntarily give up parental rights and have to pay child support - not sure about amounts etc.
/r/MensRights04/12/12 11:06 AM
1

The problem with this reasoning is that you give some people the ability to decide whether another human being lives or not, conscious or otherwise. The obvious difference with abortion is that the baby is feeding off someone's body, and they have to consent to that. Here it can survive without forcing anyone's body into doing anything.
/r/MensRights04/12/12 10:58 AM
3

Without consciousness there is no ability to experience pain You mean to tell me that if you put a knife through a baby's leg there will be no physical pain?
/r/MensRights04/12/12 10:56 AM
1

Sorry but I find your conclusions rather nonsensical. It just seems fitting the pattern of severely over complicating everything. It's simple: rape carries heavy emotional and psychological consequences because it is forced. In the case of drunk fucking someone you wouldn't had you been sober nobody is forcing you, it is just a bad judgement call due to intoxication. Your brain and your body know this the next day and a year after it happens and of course react completely different than to being…
/r/MensRights04/12/12 10:19 AM
1

I guess you don't know much about STDs
/r/MensRights03/12/12 08:09 AM
1

Did any of the girls that called come over? :))
/r/MensRights03/12/12 08:08 AM
11

Not sure that this belongs in mens rights, still just want to say that a society that sees naked children as sexual had something go wrong in it
/r/MensRights01/12/12 12:20 AM
2

why not, if it's consensual?
/r/MensRights01/12/12 12:15 AM
13

To me shes a pedophile, she has sex with minors. If thats not the definition of pedophile, they should rewrite it to be more accurate. That's not what a pedophile is, it never was. pe·do·phile [pee-duh-fahyl] noun, Psychiatry. an adult who is sexually attracted to young children. young children means prepubescent btw.
/r/MensRights01/12/12 12:13 AM
1

Putting words in my mouth...you're not wasting your time, you're just avoiding inconvenient questions. If you refuse to debate that's fine, but don't start making claims you can't defend in the first place then :)
/r/MensRights30/11/12 11:56 PM
3

I love TYT and Ana Kasparian normally, but her laughter in the beginning was pretty bothering
/r/MensRights30/11/12 09:26 AM
4

Wow, so ridiculous. So the manager is basically giving women a free reign to steal? Go over her head, I'd say
/r/MensRights30/11/12 09:25 AM
0

evolution-honed superior strength and endurance Is that why women live 5-10 years more than men, everywhere? EDIT: shamefully stupid vocabulary error
/r/MensRights30/11/12 09:20 AM
1

"Here are hundreds of verses showing this book likes violence and incites people to it" "Not true, they are all taken out of context" "Ok then, please show me the context" "I'm not about to waste time with insincere, close-minded people."
/r/MensRights30/11/12 09:11 AM
0

You are putting such a broad blanket on christianity like it's an unified religion with a clear command structure, when in fact there are about 30,000 sects off it. Christianity demands peace and punishes violence. Christianity has had violent periods of time. I never once claimed Christianity was always peaceful. However, Christianity is not regarded as a violent religion. Typically if you are violent, you don't qualify for the title of Christian. Then how come Uganda, a predominantly christian…
/r/MensRights30/11/12 09:09 AM
2

What about stop moving goal posts? You claimed before there are no verses in the bible advocating violence, now that I show only a few to you you claim they are not relevant. You are making the same lame excuses as the muslim guy is, ironically using logic against him while failing yourself at it because of your religion/ Well if those and hundreds of others are not relevant christian religions should stop claiming the bible as their holy book, the word of god or "inspired by god" and used Thoma…
/r/MensRights30/11/12 08:42 AM
1

What site it doesn't matter as long as the verses are valid and not fabricated. This "not in context" babble is getting tiring. Someone asked you to show the proper context then, I'm gonna have to do the same :)
/r/MensRights30/11/12 08:37 AM
1

Kill Nonbelievers They entered into a covenant to seek the Lord, the God of their fathers, with all their heart and soul; and everyone who would not seek the Lord, the God of Israel, was to be put to death, whether small or great, whether man or woman. (2 Chronicles 15:12-13 NAB) Kill Followers of Other Religions. If your own full brother, or your son or daughter, or your beloved wife, or you intimate friend, entices you secretly to serve other gods, whom you and your fathers have not known, god…
/r/MensRights30/11/12 12:28 AM
1

I showed you hundreds already. You're bad at trolling.
/r/MensRights29/11/12 11:37 PM
0

God Kills an Extended Family "You have done more evil than all who lived before you. You have made other gods and have made me furious with your gold calves. And since you have turned your back on me, I will bring disaster on your dynasty and kill all your sons, slave or free alike. I will burn up your royal dynasty as one burns up trash until it is all gone. I, the LORD, vow that the members of your family who die in the city will be eaten by dogs, and those who die in the field will be eaten b…
/r/MensRights29/11/12 11:34 PM
0

More Rape and Baby Killing Anyone who is captured will be run through with a sword. Their little children will be dashed to death right before their eyes. Their homes will be sacked and their wives raped by the attacking hordes. For I will stir up the Medes against Babylon, and no amount of silver or gold will buy them off. The attacking armies will shoot down the young people with arrows. They will have no mercy on helpless babies and will show no compassion for the children. (Isaiah 13:15-18 N…
/r/MensRights29/11/12 11:34 PM
0

Kill False Prophets 1) Suppose there are prophets among you, or those who have dreams about the future, and they promise you signs or miracles, and the predicted signs or miracles take place. If the prophets then say, 'Come, let us worship the gods of foreign nations,' do not listen to them. The LORD your God is testing you to see if you love him with all your heart and soul. Serve only the LORD your God and fear him alone. Obey his commands, listen to his voice, and cling to him. The false prop…
/r/MensRights29/11/12 11:33 PM
0

Just some verses urging people to kill, leaving out the stuff about slavery, rape, sacrifices etc. because I don't have all night Kill People Who Don't Listen to Priests |Anyone arrogant enough to reject the verdict of the judge or of the priest who represents the LORD your God must be put to death. Such evil must be purged from Israel. (Deuteronomy 17:12 NLT) Kill Witches |You should not let a sorceress live. (Exodus 22:17 NAB) Kill Homosexuals |If a man lies with a male as with a women, both o…
/r/MensRights29/11/12 11:31 PM
0

Come on, don't be like that guy now. Do I have to start pasting hundreds of verses explicitly inciting / glorifying violence so you could tell me they are out of context?
/r/MensRights29/11/12 06:17 PM
1

I never claimed such a thing, not sure where you got that idea
/r/MensRights29/11/12 09:29 AM
0

I would love that
/r/MensRights29/11/12 09:17 AM
1

It's all in the christian holy book too, the only difference is most xtians done their violence phase earlier
/r/MensRights29/11/12 09:05 AM
2

O'really?
/r/MensRights29/11/12 08:57 AM
0

yeah, we need to stop claiming everyone is something just because they identify with it
/r/MensRights29/11/12 08:50 AM
2

There is no "the" in the post he was replying to, so it couldn't have been that. My money's on "that"
/r/MensRights28/11/12 02:46 PM
1

So Carla Bruni shouldn't talk about woman issues because she's part of the elite class and thus couldn't possibly understand what regular women go through...say a bunch of men with serious faces.
/r/MensRights27/11/12 09:11 AM
1

True but it could be argued that there's a very good chance it will do more harm to more than one person in the near future, and it does almost direct harm to the victim(s) seeing their tormentor released. I guess the best argument against it is that once you start going down that path you start on a very slippery slope with too many uncontrollable variables.
/r/MensRights23/11/12 10:01 PM
1

Yeah long term changes are coming if you do it daily. I'm re-reading a wonderful book called "The power of now" by Eckhart Tolle, it's great for a different perspective and personal realizations, if you want to dribble in it. Not overly mystical I promise, just a bit :D
/r/MensRights23/11/12 09:03 PM
1

Yeah I've been struggling with the past as well...and projected future. You might want to look into meditation, yoga...it really helps stop your mind (just tried simple meditation myself)
/r/MensRights23/11/12 07:36 PM
1

That..seems to be overly optimistic, especially in sexual assault cases where report and trial rates are very low to begin with. And there's always the counter argument that some innocents are going to suffer for this person to get caught again. I'm not exactly advocating for innocents to be kept in jail so that guilty ppl don't get released, just can't think of how to argue against it objectively.
/r/MensRights23/11/12 06:12 PM
3

Only thing I can advise you is to try and accept what happened, I mean really accept it instead of fighting it
/r/MensRights23/11/12 06:09 PM
1

Honest question - why? I thought I believed that too but now I can't find a good reason to...
/r/MensRights23/11/12 05:17 PM
8

Very fucked up, sorry about what happened to you.
/r/MensRights23/11/12 05:16 PM
3

Read the text man. The DA clearly said it's so women won't be put off from reporting sexual assaults. Has nothing to do with self admitting perjurers.
/r/MensRights23/11/12 05:15 PM
2

Good point but that's not why she's not being punished though. In these rare cases I'm sure a deal can be cut with the prosecution for a minimal sentence. But the same reason is given for not punishing perjurers that are caught on rape issues
/r/MensRights23/11/12 05:12 PM
3

Punishing the girl is just passing the buck around. Sorry, what? She's the one that started all this by accusing him, then let him rot 15 years in jail, well beyond the mind of a 11 year old. She could have freed him anytime, at 16, at 19, at 21...give him a few more free years after she put him in prison. In what universe would she be some kind of scapegoat if punished?
/r/MensRights23/11/12 05:09 PM
17

I think it's a decently funny joke though :)
/r/MensRights23/11/12 12:43 PM
2

This is how people understood it, and it still seems dead wrong. How the hell can you prove that she didn't say no 5 minutes in? It's logically impossible
/r/MensRights22/11/12 08:03 PM
12

You mean: well there you stop!
/r/MensRights22/11/12 12:28 PM
1

so rape doesn't exist, it never happens?
/r/MensRights22/11/12 11:31 AM
1

Good point, and in the reverse scenario where the man wants more and suffers for it (which is extremely common) the woman is praised for being independent. Ask them next time if they think the man is raped in those scenarios
/r/MensRights22/11/12 11:29 AM
1

Thinly veiled brag "I take all my dates to the bedroom"
/r/MensRights22/11/12 11:27 AM
1

I've heard a lot of people, live and online, downplaying rape implying it is very often, if not most of the time, a made up accusation. So I think there is a lot of truth to that, those opinions get ammo from the false allegations that surface. Also in the UK where this happened there is the famous 6.5% conviction rate of rapes reported to the police, the judge was probably thinking of that. For the cases that reach court the conviction rate is 58%, so the vast majority never reach court, one fa…
/r/MensRights22/11/12 11:22 AM
0

I think the bigger issue here is why do you think you need such a person to be close to you most of the time.
/r/MensRights21/11/12 07:05 PM
5

He's just trying to push his holocaust revisionism agenda
/r/MensRights21/11/12 12:52 PM
1

Good points.
/r/MensRights20/11/12 08:38 PM
1

So mandatory in your state...are there similar regulations for most states too? I always suspected preferential treatment for teaching the jewish genocide as opposed to other genocides of modern times. I wonder if this is a big factor in American support for Israel. Not keen on conspiracy theories myself but seems a logical correlation.
/r/MensRights20/11/12 03:39 PM
3

Well they cite a government survey so it's not their figures. Thanks
/r/MensRights20/11/12 02:26 PM
27

Good for calling her out on her BS. Though she should be called on the 2% made up statistics as well, anyone got reliable sources for the real percentage of male vs female abuse?
/r/MensRights20/11/12 01:29 PM
3

So he was charged just because of her say-so? Or he wasn't charged and was about to be...not sure I understood that part
/r/MensRights20/11/12 01:21 PM
2

I don't view this as a black and white issue. In reality a lot of sex workers are victims of human trafficking (basically slaves, forced into it), it is a big problem all over Europe for instance and from what I know much more so in Asia. So the "buying a girl" slogan is not disingenuous in many case. It's also common sense and common knowledge many of them are miserable human beings. The choice is not exactly a rational, well thought of thing, many times result of abuse or coercion etc.; I doub…
/r/MensRights20/11/12 01:13 PM
1

Holocaust classes? Is that a common curriculum in American schools/high schools? If so, can anyone tell me how long it is studied and when
/r/MensRights20/11/12 01:01 PM
1

Let's not make up words that scratch the brain though - you mean more immoral. And no, it's not more immoral than doing a travesty of justice (and having the whole justice system perverted) just because someone claims they were drunk, with zero evidence. The worst part of all this is takes away personal responsibility for the person "drunk" or drinking, who has consensual sex at the time they are drunk and places it in the hands of someone else. Now that is more immoral
/r/MensRights18/11/12 12:05 PM
1

No, just don't want to convict anyone based only on a witness testimony. Besides as I said and you ignored, making someone responsible for other people's drunken state, and requiring them to assess said state (is she sober enough to consent or not? better give her a blood test!) is immoral in the first place
/r/MensRights17/11/12 03:37 AM
0

Wow...honestly, what a misogynistic load of crap. Downvote away if you will but nobody should be forced to carry something they want inside their body.
/r/MensRights17/11/12 02:36 AM
1

Actually what I meant was that since the state of one's drunkenness cannot be proven in any way it shouldn't be considered evidence. Because that makes someone eligible for rape conviction simply based on someone's word.
/r/MensRights16/11/12 09:57 PM
1

This is a cut and dry, 100% rape situation for me. Sorry you had to go through that.
/r/MensRights16/11/12 08:28 PM
1

Had a fb argument with my friend that shared that case and found it hilarious. So did all the commentators obviously. He said even though it's rape, it's still funny because it hardly ever happens.
/r/MensRights16/11/12 08:27 PM
1

Wow, what a story! Congrats for finding your way back from the rape and the bullshit reactions you received. It's shocking how many people give in to the indoctrination and actually think men can't be raped. If you were a girl I'd say "big hugsssss" or some corny shit like that, but you are male and so am I, so I might discriminate against you on that one :)
/r/MensRights16/11/12 07:57 PM
2

It's not painful for anyone to grasp that concept, it's just that the concept is so wrong and immoral. People should be responsible for their own actions and consent given at the time, not place it upon other people. And as OP points out, it's incredibly easy to abuse this idea by lying. After all there's no way to prove someone was drunk enough not to be able to consent at the time.
/r/MensRights16/11/12 06:21 PM
1

you don't have to worry about being accused of thinking the wrong thing This sentence, about China? Had to LOL a bit
/r/MensRights09/11/12 05:22 PM
1

That's what wrong with the whole marriage/divorce system and property sharing imo
/r/MensRights09/11/12 04:41 PM
1

Do you mean to tell me you owned the house, and your gf who didn't own it was allowed to stay there and you not allowed to kick her out of your own property? That can't be true, was it both your house or were you co-signers on rent or something
/r/MensRights09/11/12 10:16 AM
1

Wow. This is the time I would get the balls to say - if you want to stay together you'll have to accept my punishment and give her a punishment spanking. But I guess that's because I have a spanking fetish...
/r/MensRights09/11/12 09:40 AM
1

Ýeah Inferious was right, chances weren't good. She was a bit physically sick but no matter since she's really into this guy, had to stop her going on and on about him a couple of times lol Interesting she says she's actually not physycally attracted to me now because her mind is set to him. I find that weird, if true really different from how men's attraction works out.
/r/seduction29/07/12 08:29 AM
1

ok thanks, sounds good. I'm pretty good at teasing. will report back. Not hoping for much but figured might as well give it a shot!
/r/seduction28/07/12 06:20 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter