TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Castigale Archive

View 2 posts and 223 comments by Castigale on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
27

DiscussionCastigale/r/MensRights25/03/15 01:27 AM
13

DiscussionCastigale/r/MensRights27/02/15 11:57 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
6

Ultimately your life comes down to what you find the most fulfillment in. Sometimes you gotta work at it, and do shit you don't like in order to get it. That's called grinding and it pays off. Narrow down the things you're really aiming for in life and just do what you have to do to get there. If its girls, so what? Go get 'em. If something else is more important then do that instead. You only got this one chance at life bro. Get whatever you fucking you can from it. Just make sure its what you …
/r/TheRedPill15/06/22 12:04 AM
1

All I gotta say is why does your teacher write worse than you do? Like I could read your stuff just fine, but the phrasing and flow of your teacher is terrible. He/she writes like they barely graduated high school.
/r/MensRights20/04/20 10:04 PM
6

What's wrong with Grimes? Does she have a history too or something?
/r/MensRights28/03/20 02:54 PM
8

In all honesty it depends on what generation he was from and what region too. Not everyone shares the same cultural norms anymore. If someone's not acting immediately threatening I wouldn't rush to assume the worst, but obviously, trust your own judgement, don't answer any questions you don't want to etc...
/r/MensRights25/02/20 01:37 AM
36

I've seen WAY too many single mothers who were intimidated or felt competition from their own daughters, even when the daughters were pre-teens. Like in situations where there was literally no need for it what-so-ever. And it comes out in some pretty fucked up ways, mainly through emotional abuse of their children. Single mothers with daughters are like time bombs.
/r/MensRights25/02/20 01:31 AM
-127

While I agree, we sadly live in a world where employees have to be told to look out for human traffickers as well. So where's the line? idk, its a sick sad world we live in...
/r/MensRights25/02/20 01:26 AM
193

The saddest part about this trick is that the reason most guys do it is to show they're not a bad guy. Its done out of consideration and care in a world that won't show us the same courtesy in return.
/r/MensRights25/02/20 01:22 AM
16

What are you talking about!? No that's not how this works. She could have them all locked in the basement and they would be charged for gang raping her!!
/r/MensRights14/02/20 12:34 PM
6

So you think this post is bullshit? Fair enough, but its a good question, many guys struggle with it, what would you say is the correct course of action then?
/r/TheRedPill11/02/20 12:37 AM
1

First of all you're strawmanning the situation, second if someone tackles you (which is NOT what happened here) then you're not taking any stance at all because your ass would be on the ground, thirdly if someone takes you straight to the ground and shows you his palms why the hell are you thanking him again??? You would need to stop and assess the situation like I suggested first, then you might find cause for thanking him later.
/r/MensRights29/01/20 12:18 AM
0

I wouldn't have assumed anything. I would have assessed what just happened first. Touch a woman, though, and the assumptions about you are already well entrenched in both society and most likely her psyche as well.
/r/MensRights28/01/20 06:38 PM
2

Headline: "Man assaults woman on street" Who needs context in today's feminist society? He didn't have her consent to save her life. Period.
/r/MensRights28/01/20 01:23 AM
3

No, because you don't need to constantly convince other guys that you aren't a threat.
/r/MensRights28/01/20 01:20 AM
13

You wouldn't. Because if it were with a dude you wouldn't have to show your "intent" not to rape him or whatever. You would have said something like "Dude you almost got hit!" instead of "Whoa, please don't think I was trying to abduct or molest you! I'm just a good guy!"
/r/MensRights28/01/20 01:18 AM
9

Once upon a time sacrificing your life to save women was a noble and honorable thing, but back then women acted accordingly as well...
/r/MensRights28/01/20 01:14 AM
2

Words have no meaning as the body has more control over you than you can think. I would say the mind has more control over the body than you think. The placebo effect is an actual documented phenomenon.
/r/TheRedPill28/01/20 12:09 AM
111

Queen Mary Tudor and Queen Elizabeth I both had a real penchant for taking heads on a whim, much like their father. Seemed putting a woman on the throne didn't do much to curb the abuses of power...
/r/MensRights22/01/20 10:53 PM
4

Feminism is all about that stolen valor
/r/MensRights21/01/20 11:24 PM
6

A better plan is throw every male in prison now, because everyone of them has had sexual thoughts, probably multiple times a day What are you some kind of puritanical Christian conservative!? You sound just like The PatriarchyTM
/r/MensRights12/01/20 11:18 PM
18

Men needs space to be themselves, and they can most easily accomplish that when they're around other men, and only men. You can call it whatever you want, but having male-only spaces is pivotal to having a healthy well adjusted sense of masculinity. Why do you think the first thing feminists did was invade and destabilize these places? Having male-only spaces is good for men and boys, and so it had to go in their eyes.
/r/MensRights11/01/20 05:52 PM
1

Countering an assumption with a conjecture isn't persuasive. I'll take your point, that perhaps there is some impact, but if that impact is imperceptible, then what are we even wasting time talking about it for? Also, that's a nice existential question you posed at the end!
/r/MensRights03/01/20 11:10 PM
0

Having surgery under anesthesia would have the same cognitive impact as having a circumcision before you have the mental capacity to form memory, ie none at all. The experience doesn't exist because you don't remember it, you literally do not 'have' that experience anywhere in your mind.
/r/MensRights03/01/20 10:58 AM
2

Do you think the experience didn't exist because you don't remember it? It did exist and it was probably excruciating and terrifying, and probably reverberated in your infant consciousness for quite some time, possibly affecting your development. Maybe it's reverberating to this day. You really have no idea. If you have no idea, how can you verify it on a cognitive level? I mean physically you can, but how can anyone claim mental harm if there's no recollection of said event? Take any given surg…
/r/MensRights03/01/20 01:07 AM
72

I'd rather have a healthy committed relationship than this sexual free for all everyone is convinced is so wonderful.
/r/MensRights07/11/19 12:47 PM
6

I admire your tact. Just I'm imagining the role reversal here. A man is comforting a young child and the mother comes up just like you did. I'd imagine she'd be pretty violent about yanking her child out of his hands. Not that I'd blame her, much, because again I think your tact in this situation was top notch, still something to think about I guess.
/r/MensRights29/10/19 02:51 AM
8

Do you notice how there is 0 outcome where she realizes she was being biased and readjust her world view? There isn't. Women are never wrong. Unless good men step up and call it out. They'll almost always rationalize their behavior, like anyone, but men get called out, women don't anymore. That needs to change for the benefit of society as a whole.
/r/MensRights29/10/19 02:47 AM
18

This is the problem I have with people like that, inevitably she's going to run around telling her how she confronted some "creepy guy at the playground" and would probably make up some bullshit to her friends the OP was acting like a pedo which would have been inevitably what she was implying by holding onto the daughter. I hate to sound like a woman hater, and I don't mean to be, but the number of females I've come across who like to spin tales out of thin air for social effect are way too dam…
/r/MensRights29/10/19 02:40 AM
5

Here's some motivation: be the kind of guy who sees past the gay shit normtards are doing and do something completely different. Be different, be unique, be yourself! Sounds like something I saw on the cover of a cosmo magazine...there are no "new" ideas out there bud. Its all recycled shit from somewhere else. Still certain concepts are worth repeating from time to time. "Remember your fundamentals" is worth repeating.
/r/TheRedPill17/10/19 11:42 AM
2

Yep
/r/MensRights16/10/19 04:49 PM
35

I get wound up and snappy, then it gets worse. First thing to realize is that THIS is their entire goal in the conversation. You're sitting here trying to get a point across, because that's how men communicate, but you're wondering why she's ignoring it, its because that's not the conversation she's having. In the game they're playing, the win condition is getting you wound up and snappy, its not to have a rational discussion.
/r/MensRights16/10/19 11:24 AM
3

You're not very good at elaborating on a point...if you have one.
/r/MensRights08/10/19 02:19 AM
2

And those come in all shades and colors...
/r/MensRights09/09/19 09:39 PM
60

This is why this shit is so stupid. Its "people who spent their lives building their wealth and skill up" who are better off than, well people who didn't, which could very easily apply to the middle aged guy who didn't do shit with his life and still works as a cashier at the gas station. The idea that you can stereotype people so easily is what's so grossly sexist, racist, agest, etc. about this whole privilege myth.
/r/MensRights09/09/19 05:02 PM
44

The theory being men provided the income. tbh I think that's the only thing that makes any sense. If the women can't pay for their children's necessities, then put them in the care of the one who can.
/r/MensRights28/08/19 09:44 PM
3

Ever since the state started making money off child support, I've met more and more mothers who are paying it as well. For instance if the child is under the custody of mother's parents the state may come after her for being a non-custodial parent. This doesn't make me any more inclined to agree with the way the system is set up though.
/r/MensRights20/08/19 11:24 PM
43

I'm glad you said it first, because I clicked this thread just to make the same point. Its not great for men/boys to cry and be fearful of things, because society will shame them for it, just like the bitch in the story. What fixes the problem isn't the permissiveness feminists like to advocate, that's actually a poison to a boy. Ridicule and shaming does work, but it creates a bitter man who lacks compassion for others, and the best way is compassion here. A strong male with the compassion to t…
/r/MensRights18/08/19 09:02 PM
1

Sure, but like I said its a mutual effort. If she's not attracted to you anymore, then maybe its your fault, maybe it isn't, but if you want to continue the marriage, you need to try, and same goes for her.
/r/MensRights10/08/19 03:45 PM
1

Tell me men's right to sex again please. I never said it in the first place. I worded my reply very carefully, and not once did I mention the terms men OR women OR rights to sex. Frankly you just sound bitter.
/r/MensRights10/08/19 03:39 PM
6

Kinda, but some level of sexual satisfaction is something spouses are supposed to provide for one another, just like love, compassion, support, and stability. If you are so selfish that you don't think you should have to contribute to your marriage, you really don't deserve to be in one. Its supposed to be a mutual effort.
/r/MensRights10/08/19 02:05 PM
5

“I want people to reflect and understand why they are so uncomfortable with seeing male genitalia,” she told Metro, adding, “If men could think twice about sending unsolicited dick pics that would be great.” Sounds like her general thesis was: "Think about how you're harming women and making them uncomfortable by sending your penis to them."
/r/MensRights28/07/19 08:37 PM
23

I honestly think that post was being satirical, but society really does act that way. The News: "Mr. Turner was found innocent of all rape charges" Feminists: HOW THE FUCK DARE THEY LET THAT RAPIST GO!!!!
/r/MensRights23/07/19 05:59 PM
6

No rules? Right, so being alfa means being sloppy and undisciplined. I dont think that's how it works. You'll never achieve much if you don't put in the work day after day consistently. That requires structure, discipline, and yes, rules. You're not much of a fucking alfa if all you do is get drunk and fuck around everyday. Maybe you'll still get laid, maybe you won't, is that really the best you got though? "Dont follow gay ass rules" ?
/r/TheRedPill19/07/19 11:33 AM
39

Especially if the interaction takes place on the premises. While you're still actively IN the establishment it should be a 100% defensible assumption that the person you're talking to AT the 18+ club is in fact over 18. At the very least it proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that you weren't out there looking for a minor to bang, you were at an adults only club looking for a legal adult. FFS I hate how stupid our legal system is sometimes. No common sense at all.
/r/MensRights05/07/19 05:21 PM
33

Both work. The original expression was barefaced lie, which once upon a time mean brazenly or boldly. To do something nakedly or out in the open, where you're vulnerable, is still considered a bold thing to do though.
/r/MensRights29/06/19 03:59 PM
20

Excuse me! It's "He-Ma'am" Thank you very much!
/r/MensRights28/06/19 09:57 PM
38

The old ways were established for a reason.
/r/MensRights16/06/19 01:19 AM
4

They won't let Ze or Zer remember...
/r/MensRights13/06/19 09:55 PM
1

A man chooses his own path in life. My point, which you still seem unclear on, is that a man is more likely than a woman to dedicate and sacrifice his life for something greater than himself. Regarding Robert Jordan, when I mentioned him dying before completing his life's work, you replied "You'll never accomplish anything if you throw yourself on the nearest sword." Which isn't what happened at all.
/r/MensRights04/06/19 10:55 AM
2

This is a very obtuse rebuttal. 1) I never said "place everything before yourself" There's no honor in that. 2) I never mentioned killing yourself over a random woman either. I mentioned family, children, etc. Things that are important. A passing female hardly clears that bar. You're arguing with someone besides me here. 3) Robert Jordan didn't die on any sword he threw himself on, he died of terminal illness. My point was that he dedicated his life to something he couldn't finish.
/r/MensRights04/06/19 12:30 AM
23

"Unrealistic standards" of beauty, being judged on their appearance, not being able to wear the same clothes twice in the same month / year / decade, having to wear makeup, fake nails, etc etc... all things men typically don't care Look all these things make women look more attractive and a man takes notice of a well kept woman, but he'll let her look however she wants to without shame. Women on the other hand shame the shit out of each other as if they're getting paid for it.
/r/MensRights03/06/19 10:28 PM
2

Principles aren't exclusive to religion, but they are a feature of it. What I'm talking about is the ability to place something to be more important than yourself. It doesn't have to be god, it can be your family, your children, your brother in arms. It could also be a life's work that you may never live to finish, like Robert Jordan and The Wheel of Time series.
/r/MensRights03/06/19 09:41 PM
11

Real men realize the world isn't all about them, and are willing to devote their lives to higher principles, even to the point of dying for them. I think that its harder to find that quality in women.
/r/MensRights03/06/19 11:44 AM
30

She can shout, but if he does it he's seen as violent/abusive etc. A man yelling should indicate the situation is that serious, and he should be heeded immediately. Instead society has degraded so that when a man yells its seen as a precursor to violence, and the whole situation turns against him.
/r/MensRights02/06/19 05:44 PM
21

There is no "less so". At no point could a man make a woman abort, and at no point could a man stop her either. Men have absolute zero say. Full stop. The only thing a man can do is be alright with her decision, or maybe he won't be. Either way it never mattered to begin with.
/r/MensRights19/05/19 05:17 PM
136

Back when were allowed to laugh at men dressing up as women.
/r/MensRights11/05/19 05:39 PM
1

I don't disagree, but at the end of the day, its still female validation that you need before you go making a baby.
/r/MensRights05/05/19 02:57 AM
1

This screams projection of her narcissism and her neuroticism. Men don't think like women do, we don't go around questioning our self worth or basing our existence on how good our self esteem is that day, nor do we base it on our looks anyway! This woman is all kinds of fucked up.
/r/MensRights04/05/19 03:43 PM
21

From a males perspective, the entirety of mating is based on female validation.
/r/MensRights04/05/19 03:40 PM
6

with sympathy or hate?
/r/MensRights04/05/19 12:53 AM
3

The pennacle of manhood is having the most influence over your life and domain as possible. At the highest levels, men are conquerors, warriors, rulers, and none of these things have to be negatively looked at, but at our best there is a drive in men to seize influence over our environments in the name of security and prosperity.
/r/MensRights08/04/19 04:51 PM
11

Then you've missed my point entirely.
/r/MensRights07/04/19 07:58 PM
25

I don't know what its like to live without arms either, and wouldn't you say that's a good thing?
/r/MensRights07/04/19 06:35 PM
19

You literally don't know though. You can't miss something you've never known in the first place. That's the crime, though, every man should have the right to experience life with an intact penis.
/r/MensRights07/04/19 06:02 PM
6

Yeah try arguing that with a feminist. They'll quickly point out to you how its not an attack on men, and that not all masculinity is bad, and that they're only talking about the things that harm men, blah blah blah. They'll deny deny deny, which is the whole point of a dog whistle. Giving the people who use it an opportunity to plausibly deny they meant any harm by it, while at the same time using it as often as they'd like to talk shit about their target.
/r/MensRights16/02/19 11:49 AM
2

Your elaboration just entrenches the original statement "A classic example of dog whistling is the argument for state rights." You wrote a proper paragraph, where you begin with the thesis and then back up your point. The problem is that state's rights isn't a great example, since the argument has a life outside of any dog whistle tactic it was used for in the past. Toxic Masculinity meanwhile was invented as a dog whistle, and that's all it will ever be.
/r/MensRights16/02/19 11:45 AM
41

Conceptually you could inure women to be fine with having their personal space invaded too, and everyone in society would view it as a great immoral injustice. I say that, and then consider how they exalt the burka and hijab as "liberation" for women. Jesus, its just all so fucked up.
/r/MensRights12/02/19 02:30 PM
1

Assuming masculinity was fragile, wouldn't it be a complete bitch move to try and "shatter" it or whatever? I assume it just means pissing on guys with low self esteem anyway, so I wish this kinda bullshit would just get called out for what it is. Being a total cunt towards men to get your rocks off.
/r/MensRights07/02/19 07:10 PM
2

Teach 'em young, expressing interest in females is forbidden. They're too delicate for such things, and feel threatened and harassed by it.
/r/MensRights30/10/18 08:28 PM
24

Its almost like they're dehumanizing men, and apparently women too, for having a little too much compassion for the "wrong" gender. Amazing isn't it?
/r/MensRights28/09/18 11:38 AM
4

You listen to women so hard, you're convinced no one listens to women THAT is insanity. Case and point, "rape culture" has become a popular narrative, despite 99.9% of the population being in staunch opposition to all forms of rape and the wild success of things like "metoo". In reality, if rape culture where real, "metoo" wouldn't stand a chance in hell, it'd just get laughed off the planet, because no one listens to women, right?? But instead people take women's accusations EXTREMELY seriously…
/r/MensRights17/08/18 06:28 PM
10

Metoo existing at all was "too far". It was literally upping the ante on an already out of control rape hysteria.
/r/MensRights16/08/18 05:12 PM
15

Yea I kinda see his comments as just a dismissal of the airy-fairy bullshit about the mystical magical vagina. Its the idea that women are special just for existing, that just isn't remotely true.
/r/MensRights16/06/17 12:31 PM
13

Did you know you can flip a coin to land on heads, but can't flip a coin to land on tails? Yeah I know there are two sides, but only one is oppressed by gravity. Its totally impossible for it to go both ways.
/r/MensRights13/05/17 03:42 PM
23

I mean personally I won't even let my woman drive, let alone pump gas or walk into the store by herself, I mean, c'mon, men can do better, ammirite? /s
/r/MensRights15/04/17 10:08 PM
34

stop focusing on rights you want to take away from others So keep the gender specific tax benefits, keep the near automatic primary custody, keep the financially crippling child support payments coming her way, keep the rape shield laws which allow false allegations with impunity, keep the Deluth model...etc etc. Not every right a woman has is harmless. There are rights that women have that can hurt men especially in the legal realm. For instance being falsely accused publicly of rape, while you…
/r/MensRights19/02/17 09:57 PM
3

That's a great sign coming from the very people complaining of being "oppressed". They're like vampires, they avoid looking at themselves in the mirror at all costs.
/r/MensRights21/01/17 10:10 PM
13

By the looks of my facebook feed, you're pretty much right.
/r/MensRights21/01/17 10:04 PM
44

Men get the long haul, women get the fast track.
/r/MensRights22/12/16 12:56 AM
5

They want to define equality itself. I think that's just a tad greedy.
/r/MensRights18/12/16 11:26 PM
2

Funny how they can complain about a thing while disproving it at the very same time, since a complaint like that is the epitome of female entitlement
/r/MensRights31/10/16 11:52 AM
13

Common misconception: defending yourself means you don't hurt your attacker. She was playing by children's rules, where fighting is okay until someone gets hurt. Most men know that you're a fucking idiot if you think you're getting into a fight without the chance of getting injured. Yea, there ARE those types, but again, idiots.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/10/16 08:01 PM
1

I haven't really seen many people standing up to them. They almost always shrink back, and/or avoid them as much as possible. This is what gives the feminist the impression that they have the higher ground both morally and socially.
/r/MensRights12/10/16 11:57 AM
3

You're not wrong, but that's where I'd say don't cause a scene. Keep it short, and forceful. There's no need to continue an argument with a "holier than tho" type. They have no business meddling with you, let them know it and be done.
/r/MensRights11/10/16 11:13 PM
7

You'd be surprised how quickly most people back down from a real confrontation. Most people just puff themselves up until someone calls them out on it. But you have a point, and that's why its paramount that you ARE actually in the right here.
/r/MensRights11/10/16 10:04 PM
7

It really depends on the part of the US that you live in. Where I'm from, I've never had any issues, and I used to babysit my step sister, and her few of her friends every summer. Granted I was in my early 20's, but I still expected to at least get weird stares in public, but it just never happened.
/r/MensRights11/10/16 08:43 PM
30

Ding! ding! ding! You're never gonna get any respect for keeping silent. Going a step further, should any stranger accost you in public for no good reason, the proper response is always righteous indignation. Don't let that shit slide, stand your ground if you can do so safely. If you're a law abiding citizen, you've done nothing to warrant being accused or suspected of anything nefarious. Sad to say it, but men have to stand up for their rights to exist in public spaces sometimes. Children are …
/r/MensRights11/10/16 08:40 PM
13

You are 'not guilty.' But that doesn't mean innocent. So by that logic, you can be "not guilty" as well as "not innocent", at the same time? If the standard is "innocent until proven guilty" then how do you end up in as neither? Or both? Which is it?
/r/MensRights08/10/16 06:24 PM
64

But if Parker wants to remain a messenger, rather than a mere filmmaker, there’s more he could do to prove himself worthy of the role. He could explain how he thinks colleges should handle cases like his own, beyond “educating men and persecuting them when things come up,” a singularly unfortunate choice of words. Guys, the more you open your mouth the more they look for a reason to hang you. And if you don't open your mouth, you bet they'll insist on convincing you that talking will make things…
/r/MensRights08/10/16 06:18 PM
-1

yeah, like I said, its probably not even worth mentioning really, I just tend to pick out linguistic nuances a lot.
/r/MensRights28/09/16 04:06 PM
31

There's a slight almost unimportant difference between king hit and sucker punch. I keep seeing king hit to mean getting hit from behind, and sucker punch can mean that, but it also just means hitting someone when they're not expecting it or distracted by something else. Its still a cowardly move though.
/r/MensRights28/09/16 02:13 PM
1

People naturally assume that, if someone says "One parent shouldn't have to pay if they don't want to", they're advocating for a child to go starving instead. Well obviously everyone knows that if the woman has to take care of the child all by herself then the child is going hungry, because women are the better care givers and that's why we award them custody. The logic really unravels quite a bit doesn't it?
/r/MensRights19/09/16 02:10 PM
3

Stand-point theory, thanks, I had forgotten what it was called when I posted.
/r/MensRights10/09/16 05:44 PM
73

Gotta say this kind of special pleading is really a non-starter. So she claims that white men can't understand the perspectives of people of color, as if that's just a fact, and men can't understand the plight of women, I'm presuming as well. So that's the case, then people of color can't understand white men etc. This is a stalemate and the only escape is the pleading "You should just trust us that what we say is honest." The so called "Listen and Believe" mantra. However this still doesn't sol…
/r/MensRights10/09/16 02:10 PM
8

I can't argue, but one can still be optimistic, right?
/r/MensRights19/08/16 02:53 PM
394

Only if she learns that falsely accusing someone of rape isn't a mature way to handle disappointment, then absolutely.
/r/MensRights19/08/16 01:31 PM
2

This is definitely the correct approach. Its really regrettable that modern feminism tries to push people to take immediate sides. I'm tired of this "war".
/r/MensRights09/08/16 12:07 AM
9

The ex-wife had a much higher paying job than the father and the house was under her name so the court gave her custody rights. If this was the actual reason, more fathers would end up with the children, and that makes this scenario even more disturbing.
/r/MensRights09/06/16 02:06 PM
1

Because when you have two 13 yr olds they're both stupid See to me, that's just all the more reason they should NOT be having sex. Why do you want two stupid teenagers playing something that carries life altering consequences? I mean there's pregnancy, sure, but there's also like a gajillion STDs out there.
/r/MensRights04/06/16 01:21 PM
-21

It definitely seems wrong. The key aspect of what's wrong, though is the coercion part of it, right? So what makes it so much more right when a 13yr old pressures and coerces another 13yr old fuck him/her? Say she's got a crush on the guy, but isn't ready to have sex and he uses that to his advantage. Now that happened to my cousin, but no one in their right mind would say her boyfriend raped her, cuz in the end she didn't regret it.
/r/MensRights04/06/16 12:32 PM
2

So let society restructure itself, I mean, if that's even possible.
/r/MensRights26/05/16 11:26 PM
1

So feminism protecting women, as a class, from examination is a good thing? And feminism keeping men "in their place" is also a good thing?
/r/MensRights26/05/16 10:07 PM
1

Yeah, I don't hesitate to blame bad actors if they're men, so why would a woman hesitate to blame other women?
/r/MensRights26/05/16 09:05 PM
3

This is a valuable way to add a moral to the story, while keeping in line with female nature (mens nature too sometimes), but this constant need for more, and better, and bigger, it doesn't make you happy unless you find your happiness first. You can build an empire and be the happiest man in the world, or you can own next to nothing and still be just as happy. But you know how it usually goes "More money, more problems".
/r/MensRights12/05/16 12:35 PM
4

I don't remember the pain at all so why does it matter I'm not sure, but I don't that justifies mutilating babies. I mean you could do a whole host of other things to a child, but because they "don't remember it then why does it matter"? That logic just doesn't work, mate.
/r/MensRights03/04/16 03:24 PM
2

Remind me to completely ignore my wife's breasts next time we have sex. I used to think she enjoyed it, but now I've been educated by feminism, and I know that women don't in fact get any sexual gratification by having their nipples stimulated. /s
/r/MensRights17/01/16 07:49 PM
4

Rather than just allowing mothers to allege that the child is at risk without a truly thorough inquisition. The system simply doesn't have the resources to function any other way. It can take a year or more just to get a proper hearing after she files a protective order, so she really doesn't even need to be able to back up her claim to put distance between you and your kid(s). Just file it, then file it again, and again. Its really broken.
/r/MensRights11/01/16 01:15 AM
13

Any loophole like filing an EPO will be exploited against fathers, regardless of whether the EPO is warranted or not. I am NOT advocating getting rid of Emergency Protective Orders, but keep in mind that any law passed that has a get-around like that will effectively become null and void. Especially if the instances of EPOs rise, then special interest groups will be able to run to these numbers as evidence of nullifying a father's rights in the broader context. Its a sick game, mates, be advised…
/r/MensRights11/01/16 12:02 AM
4

That's probably why 1 in 4 exists, they have to believe in their soul they were really raped because they can't face that they're a terrible human being. I'm just imagining a feminist protest group, and someone getting up with a bull horn and going "Raise your hand if you've ever been raped!!" I can see an almost unanimous showing of hands. It'll become synonymous with "oppressed" which they all already believe, but claiming "rape" will just become another form of virtue signaling. "If you weren…
/r/MensRights30/12/15 03:52 PM
1

True, but I'm not even trying to go that far with it though. The idea that a young guy should somehow be grateful he got to sleep with an older woman implies that he wanted it or something. All I'm saying is that I've seen more girls actively chase older guys than I have younger guys chasing older women. You can leave the bit about legitimacy and all that out if you'd like, but I'm just saying I've seen a good number of girls actively pursuing guys older than themselves. It makes sense too, olde…
/r/MensRights22/12/15 03:28 PM
-5

What kills me is that in my lifetime I have seen more girls lusting and chasing after much older guys than visa-versa. This idea that a younger girl and an older man are unnatural just never rang true in my experience.
/r/MensRights22/12/15 03:01 PM
1

Given that you're more or less shamed and/or laughed off for trying, I'd say your assessment is correct.
/r/MensRights29/11/15 02:34 PM
-6

Im all for men's rights, I really am. But when I popped into this sub I really didn't expect to see a stickied thread, calling for Title IX investigations, over ONE bad teacher, a handful of boys, in a kindergarten class they'll soon be graduating from, and legos. Why the hell is this even a story for a news outlet to even be reporting on, much less M.R.A. getting involved over it. Pick your battles, guys. There's bigger issues than 5yr olds and legos.
/r/MensRights19/11/15 05:29 PM
1

It sounds as though you are saying that feminists believe men are their betters.
/r/MensRights14/10/15 10:01 PM
3

Sexually based offenses are especially heinous.
/r/MensRights14/10/15 01:20 PM
7

Totally agree. Trying to get women to serve MORE jail time for instance is the wrong way to go. It frankly sounds vengeful. I think LESS jail time for everyone would be the better approach.
/r/MensRights14/10/15 01:15 PM
74

When feminists talk about patriarchy, I take examples like this one and switch the genders to illustrate what an actual misogynistic world might look like. Man avoids jail after sending indecent pictures of himself to underage girl. He avoided punishment when judge noted that his wife wasn't acknowledging his sexual needs. Instead the reverse is true, the women are the ones able to get away with bullshit like this. What conclusions can be drawn from that?
/r/MensRights14/10/15 01:11 PM
1

This kinda speaks to the fact that isn't about the 'victim' of sexual assault, but who the perpetrator is. We've seen it time and again, if a woman does something, the victimhood gets denied on the basis of who the perpetrated it. If a man is accused, victimhood granted. Woman does it, then apparently there was no victim. How's that for any sense of the word "justice"?
/r/MensRights02/10/15 03:18 PM
2

Goodbye misogyny, hello "Gynophobia". Well done, feminism.
/r/MensRights02/10/15 03:09 PM
106

Met a guy last week told me this story. He had just separated from his gf of 3 years. She actually broke into his house just to protest the breakup (with violence not logic) guy had to restrain her until she stormed out, called the cops, and waited on the stoop for them to show up. Cops buy the girls story, guy gets locked up and his public defender tried to get him to take a deal for a 3 month sentence. His fucking public defender wouldn't even entertain the idea that the guy he was representin…
/r/MensRights12/08/15 11:48 PM
49

Which is sad because Feminism and Men's Rights aren't really on the same level. Feminism doesn't equal "women's rights", just look at how many other issues they try to blanket these days. "Rape culture" for instance has jack shit to do with a woman's rights. She has those rights completely covered already in a vast number of ways, yet feminism is still obsessed with the fact that rape is still a thing that sometimes happens. That's not complaining about rights, that's complaining about certain i…
/r/MensRights11/07/15 10:24 PM
6

That's all I got then lol But yes. The media bias is real, and well represented here.
/r/MensRights17/06/15 09:43 PM
2

I'll be the odd man out and state the controversial. Rape and statutory rape, are not the same. One is without consent, one is without legal sanction.
/r/MensRights17/06/15 09:14 PM
13

And yet i hear some feminists complain that men need to get over the fact that women have periods, and accept the sight of a bloody pant-crotch. What do these two things have in common? Women attempting to regulate male actions and attitudes.
/r/MensRights04/06/15 07:15 PM
28

What? Don't you know? Women's bodies are natural, men's bodies are threatening.
/r/MensRights04/06/15 07:09 PM
30

How damned oblivious can they get!? Jesus. It just blows my mind sometimes.
/r/MensRights02/06/15 01:57 PM
5

I believe that NAWALT punches a pretty big hole in TRP philosophy that most redpillers don't account for. I studied up on TRP philosophy for about a couple of months until I started to realize that while they make some good points, there ARE some women that just don't fit the "mold" they cast for women. Some of my best friends have been women who were quite capable of being rational and approaching situations honestly. The fact that there are women who dislike modern-era feminism is reason enoug…
/r/MensRights17/05/15 01:54 AM
1

I agreed with your first point about gender roles not being such a bad idea, but this part: What was efficient 2000 years ago is not efficient today. I believe needs further grounding and foundation. I'm just not sold on this very recent "Everybody gets to make up their own rules" thing yet. I'm all for personal freedoms, but having specified roles still seems like an efficient concept.
/r/MensRights22/04/15 01:17 AM
2

Both of you miss the point: There are two types of victims. Those who are victims because bad shit happens to them, and those who are victims because it has become their identity. The first isn't being ignored in order to condemn the second.
/r/MensRights15/04/15 12:09 AM
0

Women can choose to have casual sex without being labeled nor devalued. Just like men, with full responsibility and accountability for their actions, just like men. You're applying the same standard to both sexes, and yet agree that we look for mates using different standards. You contradict.
/r/MensRights13/04/15 08:44 PM
0

Only if you insist that men and women look for partners in identical fashion. Hint: They don't. Women don't value the same traits that men value in women. We're a sexually dimorphic species.
/r/MensRights13/04/15 08:15 PM
-4

he woman who only wanted to have sex that night got her wish. Did she? She should be held responsible sure, and obviously she has agency, but that has little to do with making good choices. The fact that she came to regret it tells me she didn't make a good decision. Who are you to decide that "looking for a relationship" inherently has a higher value than getting "just a quick fuck"? Whether or a not a "quick fuck" is more important than a relationship? Seriously? Chick got pregnant by a dude s…
/r/MensRights13/04/15 05:05 PM
-7

I disagree with nearly everything you just said haha, good job. She didn't get "used", she didn't disrespect herself either. Casual sex is not some shameful act that ranks below any other type of sex. Your definition of a 'respectable woman' and my own are very different. I very much believe she disrespected herself by being such an easy fuck. Any man who forks over his house and wallet to anyone who needs to use it is a fool, and same can be said for a woman who gives away her sought after sexu…
/r/MensRights13/04/15 04:55 PM
22

Agreed. That's where things get really messed up.
/r/MensRights13/04/15 02:45 PM
81

The men used her. Actually they did, because that's all she presented herself as. Someone who has sex with people no-strings-attached. So the men who only wanted to have sex that night got their wish. She didn't present herself as someone looking for a relationship, or someone who deserved more than just a quick fuck. People will only see you for how you present yourself to them. She got used, but only because she told everyone she had nothing more to offer them. I feel bad for her to be honest.…
/r/MensRights13/04/15 02:16 PM
3

He said ought, not should, which is innocuous in a way Well the key difference here, and obviously you're aware, but yeah we "ought to" see more women in STEM but we don't, and there are reasons for that is just like saying "We would expect to see this thing happening but we don't."
/r/MensRights13/04/15 11:01 AM
3

The 80's flick "Mister Mom" comes to mind.
/r/MensRights12/04/15 11:48 PM
6

Its turning into a situation where they'll eventually push for outright torture under the guise of "treatment" and people still won't think its enough because "He's a rapist, what can you say?" The fundamental problem with this is that we're moving beyond "justice" and firmly into the realm of "vengeance". At some point the people doing the punishing against (really whoever) become no better, or even worse, than the person they're punishing. Rapists suck, but at what point do the folks in the ju…
/r/MensRights12/04/15 12:00 PM
2

I honestly don't know, but I'll start paying attention to it from now on. Thanks.
/r/MensRights12/04/15 02:01 AM
2

lol fuck off with that non-sense. Its my life, and these are people in my circle. As for the guys i know, you really don't have to be super rational when we're playing a game of basketball or shooting the shit about dumb movies. Most of the dudes I know just aren't into deep issues, but they're good people. With the ladies in my life, I don't do much else with them except hang out and talk about a wide range of things. If I'm going to have an in depth discourse then I'm most likely talking with …
/r/MensRights11/04/15 05:05 PM
2

This is has become 95% of the criteria I use when determining whether I'm going to be friends with a female. The other 5% has more to do with working relationships and circumstance. Otherwise I just don't hang around with woman who can't talk with reason or some semblance of self reflection. I could get into the merits of your assertions, but I'll only address your strawman at this point. At NO point did I say anything about women being less rational than men. My post was explicitly about MY CRI…
/r/MensRights11/04/15 04:32 PM
0

Yeah the only reason I don't, is because there's a bit of a wider range of things I can connect to men on. We don't always have to talk in depth on things in order to do cool shit together.
/r/MensRights11/04/15 02:31 PM
8

This is has become 95% of the criteria I use when determining whether I'm going to be friends with a female. The other 5% has more to do with working relationships and circumstance. Otherwise I just don't hang around with woman who can't talk with reason or some semblance of self reflection. My tolerance for bullshit is just that low these days.
/r/MensRights11/04/15 11:51 AM
30

If I'm not mistaken "rape culture" was a term coined to describe the systematic nature of prison rape and its role in the hierarchy of inmates. In some ways it could be argued that a "rape culture" exists. But that has fuck all to do with women/men and feminism.
/r/MensRights09/04/15 04:13 PM
29

Alas, our school system really is failing young boys these days, isn't it?
/r/MensRights09/04/15 04:10 PM
25

I would also like to see this look a little more real. I mean for the sake of the point they're making, they need to have the girl kicking the dude, maybe actually get him on the ground. If she doesn't hit him too hard they could make it look believable. Then on the reverse, have him just shoving, holding and stuff. Her violence level needs to eclipse his, simply because its shows how women are not only allowed to get away with stuff guys can't, but women can get away with things a LOT worse tha…
/r/MensRights06/04/15 11:03 PM
5

If you wanted to call Sommers something besides "feminist" the closest you could factually state is that she's egalitarian. She doesn't fight for men's rights, she fights for fewer double-standards in the gender debate, as well as less propaganda. To a rad-fem, though, she's an apostate, and nothing shy of "murder her" is fair game to them.
/r/MensRights04/04/15 07:30 PM
7

It is rather simplistic, isn't it? And yet some of it makes a bit of sense. I just don't buy into the whole scheme of it.
/r/MensRights01/04/15 10:46 AM
2

What's sick is that some females are capable of being predatory while their still young. For instance a girl I went to highschool with apparently started fooling around with a male teacher. This happened years ago, but I vividly remember hearing her talking to her friends about how funny it was when she decided to get him in trouble with his wife. It was only after that the word started spreading, and cops were brought in on the case. She may have only been 16 at the time, but she was in total c…
/r/PussyPass31/03/15 10:31 PM
15

Talk about "privilege", Jesus Christ.
/r/MensRights30/03/15 07:59 PM
11

Victim blaming 101
/r/MensRights29/03/15 06:35 PM
2

If you look at the "Arab Spring" situation that popped up a bit ago, it actually was difficult deciding which group was fighting for the right reasons and who was tearing down a legitimate gov't at the time. I mean heck, Luke Skywalker was a youth living in the desert who was taken in by a fringe religious leader, scooped up by insurgents to attack military instillations and overthrow the government.
/r/MensRights29/03/15 11:35 AM
23

I don't see the crime, but I see the accusations. "Leering" is just the pejorative form of "admiring" anyway. Realistically you can't distinguish the two aside from approaching one negatively and one postively.
/r/MensRights28/03/15 11:15 PM
3

Sure, that's understandable. We're talking about a static definition attempting to define something as unpredictable as a social movement, though. You have to let the feminists speak for themselves.
/r/MensRights26/03/15 05:13 PM
2

No. I'm afraid I never did understand Corky, but anyway, seems you wanna fight so lets talk. Unless you are equally concerned for all genders, you will never see relief for yours. You seem to imply that unless your advocacy is so broad and vague as to include concern for everyone, that in turn no one will want to join you. That kind of flies in the face of EVERY POLITICAL ISSUE IN OUR CULTURE. Do you honestly think that the Democrats or Republicans would be where they are now if they fought for …
/r/MensRights26/03/15 04:38 PM
10

I used to feel that way too, but the rabbit hole goes much much deeper. You're not required to take an interest, but if you do, you'll find the problem is much larger than just a few assholes.
/r/MensRights26/03/15 04:12 PM
4

The dictionary doesn't define feminism. Feminists do.
/r/MensRights26/03/15 04:08 PM
3

This is gonna be a tough point, so try to follow along as best you can. What about "men's rights" even comes close to suggesting "egalitarianism" is within the scope of focus? Granted the vast majority of PEOPLE (both men and women) are very much in favor of equality, but "Men's Rights" is concerned with Men's. Rights. That does NOT suggest oppression, discrimination, segregation, or prejudice, but it also doesn't suggest a concern for equality on a wider societal scale. Men's Rights is concerne…
/r/MensRights26/03/15 04:04 PM
18

Honestly even children are more accepting of diversity than these people are.
/r/MensRights23/03/15 10:43 AM
10

rule the world lol they hardly seem capable of navigating the world, much less rising to the top of it.
/r/MensRights23/03/15 10:40 AM
2

The title of this video needs to be the only rhetorical push for you guys. Feminism is built on this "oppressed people punching up" frame, but the more robust you can build out the argument "Feminism is the Establishment" the more the blinders will begin to peel off. The evidence is everywhere, and it directly undermines feminism's core belief.
/r/MensRights22/03/15 05:24 PM
17

What continues to piss me off is that the reason these laws need to exist is that otherwise women would literally be throwing infants and babies in dumpsters, rivers, or creeks. The fact we have to try to keep them from literally murdering their own babies is an abomination.
/r/MensRights21/03/15 09:14 PM
11

Don't you know? She gets to make her own choices, and if those choices happen to be poor ones, its okay because its probably someone else's fault.
/r/MensRights21/03/15 03:17 PM
1

Hate to break it to you, but people make bad decisions at every age.
/r/MensRights20/03/15 10:50 PM
104

Pssh, there's no war on men, that's just silly. /s
/r/MensRights19/03/15 04:28 PM
1

once upon a time millennia ago, members our species died right about the time they hit 30. Some of them lived longer, some of them died much sooner, but one things for sure, the teenagers of the tribes knew they were in training to take over in perhaps a few short years. The only rule that kept you alive was your ability to out compete your peers. Out hunt, out charm, out fuck. Tribalism meant you protected your own, but competition was the only honing factor that kept you from starvation. Now d…
/r/MensRights19/03/15 12:32 AM
15

To the women, I'm sure this was all totally worth it. I bet they'd even be willing to do it again, or hey, why not start a "revenge" group for women who think their boyfriends are cheating on them? Because, ya know, there won't be any punishment, and it'll sure be one hell of a good time. /s
/r/MensRights19/03/15 12:21 AM
-2

"Some women just want to watch the world burn." You're right when you say they do nothing to elevate themselves, but I firmly believe they aim to tear down everything men have built. By self-righteously claiming it for themselves, and when you claim something you had no part in building, then no, they don't value men's achievements either. To them, though, men do value those things, and that has to stop.
/r/MensRights16/03/15 06:03 PM
1

I can't wait for Twitter for finally 'address harassment', because it can only end in a few ways, all of them very bad. They can make changes and it'll never be enough, or they can make the kinds of changes that lead to complete over reach and Twitter eventually becomes a shittier and shittier medium and dies off.
/r/MensRights15/03/15 08:36 PM
5

I hate when people think that mocking something is the same as making a valid counter argument. Stupid, stupid, stupid.
/r/MensRights12/03/15 03:20 PM
11

women have a very innate pack-mentality, or in-group identification, where men just don't. Men can develop a sense of comradry, and kinship with each other, but it needs to be under an external banner of some kind, where women just think this way simply for being of the same gender. Not ALL women are like this, but I'd wager NONE of the guys are like that at all.
/r/MensRights12/03/15 03:17 PM
2

Noted, thanks.
/r/MensRights09/03/15 02:14 PM
9

Man this rhetoric reminded me of WWII Germany, especially the "genetically superior" part, well "biologically" but same message being sent.
/r/MensRights09/03/15 10:40 AM
1

Haha yeah. Broken bones vs. severed arteries. Tough call.
/r/MensRights07/03/15 01:00 PM
2

I hate to say it, but man-on-man violence really does look more destructive and violent, than when two women go at it. Flipping it, woman-on-women violence appears less harmful, than when two guys are fighting.
/r/MensRights07/03/15 12:10 PM
6

She basically admitted it too.
/r/MensRights07/03/15 12:45 AM
14

There's no setting in which we should condone a man hitting a woman BUT!! BUT!! Its entirely okay to condone a woman hitting another woman!! By extension all domestic violence within a lesbian relationship are alright, and gay men hitting each other is fine too I guess. BUT!! No man should ever hit a woman for any reason what-so-ever. Keep in mind UFC and domestic abuse are about as far from one another as you can possibly get.
/r/MensRights07/03/15 12:41 AM
0

Yeah, and pedophiles speak English. Should I not use English? Words are just words, dude. There's no monopoly on the word "toxic" and there's no ban on other people using it. It has a definition that anyone is allowed to use. So no, I'm not an SJW, and yes, I used the word "toxic". Deal with it man. The world's a big place.
/r/MensRights06/03/15 11:51 PM
3

MGTOW seems pretty toxic to me as well. I mean its "Men Going Their Own Way" so I can't really criticize them for doing their own thing, but I definitely wouldn't recommend to any of the guys I know. And I have no doubt women do it to each other as well. I think its just the difference between female communication and male communication, in general. I get called a misogynist, but I'm pretty convinced there are cognitive differences between men and women. I'm not disparaging either side, but diff…
/r/MensRights06/03/15 05:01 PM
11

If feminism isnt the "irrationality professional league" I don't know what is. How many times have we seen it intentionally done to further an agenda? And I suppose you would also deny that women aim to promote themselves to higher positions (as would anyone), and would never use emotionally charged language to get there, tossing out things like rape, and assault, and harassment to secure any advantage they can. I don't know about you, but I've seen too many females get upset and levy any accusa…
/r/MensRights06/03/15 04:18 PM
38

Well here's the crux of the situation. She asks: "Why don't you find me attractive?" You answer. SHE feels attacked. Its all a clever ploy to set in motion a chain of events to make you look bad. I've found that women tend to be very adept at social chess, and can put you in a check-mate (no win scenario) pretty easily a lot of times. Like you said, the more you explain the more she feels 'attacked'. Avoid playing the game altogether, brother. I'm not advocating MGTOW, just avoid certain types o…
/r/MensRights06/03/15 04:06 PM
1

The people passing the laws are racist, but not the law itself. The law may discriminatory, but it cannot outright dislike/hate any minority group. It may disenfranchise them, but the law itself isn't sentient. Ultimately its just a decree on a piece of paper that people chose to follow or not follow. My point was that the people who enforce the law itself, might not agree with it, and thus in a system that favors one group over another, not all politicians or cops or judges necessarily have to …
/r/MensRights03/03/15 04:14 PM
-7

Here's the thing tho, and this'll be controversial, but oppression comes from institutions and legal frameworks, and neither of those things can be "racist" or "sexist" or whatever. Going back to the 50's or 60's America here. But "The Law" is just a standard, its not a person. If the law says "Men are prohibited from X,Y,Z" its not because The Law itself doesn't like men, the law is just the law. Black and White, not emotionally invested in anything. Furthermore, the police that enforce the law…
/r/MensRights03/03/15 11:49 AM
0

You're certainly overreacting here. Yeah, I guess the idea of a dead babies kinda does that me.
/r/MensRights28/02/15 12:42 AM
11

This is called circular reasoning. You argue from your conclusion, instead of towards it. They're not building a case, they're assuming the verdict. I don't think I've heard a single attorney try this logic. "Mr. Anderson, did you wash your hands before or after murdering Agent Smith?"
/r/MensRights25/02/15 07:40 PM
7

Most states elect judges, but there per-requisites for being eligible to run. A law degree would be among them.
/r/MensRights25/02/15 07:36 PM
4

In the womb: ...Everyone's favorite item is a tiny white onesie with powder blue lettering that says Future Trophy Husband. You think for a fleeting moment that this is a bit odd, even inappropriate, but all of your friends think it's super cute. You guess that it is. Let's replace the word "trophy" with "model" or "ideal", and we have either a "model wife" or a "model husband". Be it trophy, model, or ideal, it means basically the same thing. Future spouse who has a partner proud to be with the…
/r/MensRights25/02/15 06:13 PM
9

Damn, a woman can't change her mind and decide to have sex without being told she was victimized and violated. Feminists really do hate their own gender, don't they? They're just determined to create as many rape-victims as possible.
/r/MensRights25/02/15 05:42 PM
8

But we're still not calling it "genital mutilation" yet are we? Not trying to be greedy, a small win, is still a win, but I think recognizing it for what it is shouldn't be this difficult.
/r/MensRights22/02/15 12:56 PM
3

Bingo.
/r/MensRights17/02/15 05:23 PM
1

Not speaking from personal opinion on this one, but insisting LGBT folks are A-OK while clinging to "fairness" (instead of "God") as your standard isn't very compelling either. Christians deem the "word of God" as more important than equality, and many humanists feel the exact opposite. It just depends on where your values lie, because there is no final say on the matter. There simply can't be, no matter how badly anyone wants it.
/r/MensRights17/02/15 01:23 AM
1

I see your point but I think the angle you're taking is above an average person's head. You're not wrong, I just don't think its plausible to assume most people thought about it that way. You're looking at it as "rape stripped of its inherent moral implications" where-as I believe most people would leave that part in tact, and separate, from any consequences thereafter.
/r/MensRights13/02/15 01:47 AM
63

Well there ya go. According to this principle that we have feminism to thank for, and since no one's arguing that men become violent sex offenders, just that women can no longer consent, women should be prohibited from drinking alcohol, because legally speaking they become "incapacitated" and can't participate in society. Men on the other hand, don't have that problem, as referenced by their frequent incarceration due to their poor decisions. Good lord Feminists are wacky!
/r/MensRights12/02/15 10:50 PM
155

When I do get into arguments with feminists, and I suggest everyone adopt this approach, I always go with the angle of how misogynistic they are. In this case: "The man is the one who has to get legal consent, because women aren't responsible enough to handle sex on their own." Next step you gotta flat out oppose such a thing, because its clearly degrading towards women. Men should not be the only ones responsible for getting consent because women are equal parties, endowed with the same honor a…
/r/MensRights12/02/15 08:27 PM
19

Most of that thread is just feminist hijacking of a discussion about a little boy and his lack of confidence. It gets pretty unbearable.
/r/MensRights12/02/15 08:23 PM
3

Although nothing wrong with this pic, considering the benefit to risk ratio, it doesn't make a whole lot of sense. A man being an abusive husband? Sure. A man forcing a woman to marry him against her will? Why on earth would he do something like that??
/r/MensRights06/02/15 10:26 PM
7

In practically all domestic violence issues there are only two parties. The victim and purpetrator. If they want to hold a workshop on stopping domestic violence then they need to be addressing one of those two groups: potential perps, or potential victims. If you go in there and they're telling YOU how NOT to be a perp, then you've just been singled out for your gender in the worst of ways. I'd definitely file a formal complaint. If the workshop is about communication and resolution, and how me…
/r/MensRights04/02/15 06:14 PM
9

Public opinion research in the US suggests women, Latinos, African-Americans, Asians and Native Americans are more concerned – and more directly affected – by climate change than other populations. Doesn't it make sense to include those who are most at risk in decisions about how we fight the defining challenge of our time? No. No it doesn't. The people who are most at risk, have, and always will be, the poorest and least able to move to a safer location. What we need are people (of any ethic ba…
/r/MensRights04/02/15 03:36 PM
5

Feminism has, and will always be, a vying for social power and control, and of course money. Its a strategy without a finish line.
/r/MensRights04/02/15 11:52 AM
9

I'm sure you know there's a deep divide in feminist circles between white feminists and black feminists. They argue something similar, that white feminists distract from the inequities black feminists face. Not calling them SJWs, but its a similar attack angle. This is the oppression Olympics after all.
/r/MensRights04/02/15 11:43 AM
1

The trouble is that we're also fostering a society where childish behavior is put on par with rational adult argument.
/r/MensRights03/02/15 11:53 AM
1

And previous guilt has no basis on current guilt. While certainly, and legally true, its also fair to say someone who habitually robs walmart and gets caught, is likely to be guilty of robbing walmart when they are apprehended on the property for the n'th time. Still it is equally possible the management has grown to dislike the person and throws out the accusations because they know that everyone is inclined to assume its true based on past instances.
/r/MensRights03/02/15 11:49 AM
4

"Don't teach women to cover up, teach BOYS to start seeing women as more than sex objects." In other words ladies, feel free to dress as enticingly as you'd like, and we can all just shame the boys for having biological desires. So glad "change.org" was just a useless PR stunt.
/r/MensRights02/02/15 03:25 PM
1

True, its hard for me to keep remembering that though, since the notion is so well ingrained in the fabric of our culture.
/r/MensRights01/02/15 03:58 PM
57

They are literally trying to turn criminals into victims by virtue of their genitalia. Its worth noting that the majority of ALL criminals are survivors of horrible situations, and a good number of them go on to commit the very crimes commited against them.
/r/MensRights31/01/15 06:53 PM
3

Half the time I don't argue from personal opinion but from opinions expressed by other parties, and I do that to make a point. We CAN be better, so we are in agreement there. I take issue with this though Men should be able to have consensual sex with any non-drunk adult they want and not be victimized by false rape charges I can only half agree to that, because I feel like its not fair to women. Men are allowed to have drunk sex and no one bats an eye, yet if a woman has drunk sex everyone begi…
/r/MensRights31/01/15 12:08 AM
3

Now you're going to extremes, and the whole scenario I made up was crazy, but again if we're going to use rhetoric to build male culture as toxic and rape inducing, then how far is too far to protect our daughters? Don't get me wrong, I WANT women to be safe, but we're left with few options when we're told that 1/3 men are out to rape women. Since our elected officials have armed guards when an assailant emerges, we put them down, so body guards certainly work, don't they? No one thinks we're bl…
/r/MensRights30/01/15 11:25 PM
5

Absolutely! Men shouldn't have sex with drunk women, but why be risky by setting up the oldest known pre-conditions for sex in the first place? Just don't let women drink/party with men and we reduce the risk of rape AND false rape down to zero. ZERO!
/r/MensRights30/01/15 10:01 PM
3

People in general, men and women, none of us are allowed to have fun "Where-ever" and "When-ever" we want. Some situations are dangerous, and according feminist rhetoric around campus, frat houses are breeding grounds for "toxic masculinity" that according to them promotes a culture where "rape is normalized". If they advocate women being allowed to party in frat houses, after saying all of those things about how dangerous frat house are, then they are, by their own standards, advocating for wom…
/r/MensRights30/01/15 08:57 PM
2

Sound advice.
/r/MensRights30/01/15 02:09 AM
44

if I go to a bar broke I'm only drinking if a buddy is spotting me or something. If you go to a bar broke, as a woman, you're drinking when most of the guys are willing to spot you. If "Drunk = Rape" and women aren't responsible for their drinking habits, then women shouldn't be allowed in bars. Logically speaking.
/r/MensRights30/01/15 01:54 AM
2

Well I don't really know, but consider that liberals purport to stand up for the minorities in America. Blacks, Hispanics, homosexuals, transgendered, the whole lot. So logically if you stand for their rights in the face of right-wing bigotry, then naturally you oppose offending these minorities as well. You promote civil rights, AND tolerance. Not everyone goes overboard, but SJWs are the modern day Political Correctness brigade.
/r/MensRights29/01/15 08:16 PM
200

Further proof it was only about smearing frat houses, and not about keeping women safe. The smartest thing for a woman to do, if she KNOWS that frats are rape-dens, is for her not to go in. So now they're not allowed, and suddenly their rights are being infringed. You know why? Because you forced them to face up the consequences of their accusations. They want to be able to have fun, where-ever, and when-ever they want, while at the same time pretending that frat houses are evil pits of misogyny…
/r/MensRights29/01/15 07:46 PM
7

the NY subway don't give a shit about people taking up two seats. If they did, they'd make a campaign about taking up two seats. Bingo.
/r/MensRights29/01/15 06:11 PM
25

How in the ever loving hell, did the Daily Show of all people not see how absurd "manspreading" is in the first place!? They practically justify the complaint by making an issue of rudeness rather than a triviality that women predominately want to complain about. I mean christ, its not like men sitting with their legs open actively oppresses or discriminates against women, but even the Daily Show realized the complaint was gendered rather than addressing the neutral passengers who take up too mu…
/r/MensRights29/01/15 06:08 PM
1

I heard a rather convincing case to be made for false accusations being instances of socially raping someone, in the sense that they become a pariah sometimes for a lengthy amount of time. False accusations can cause a whole host of psychological problems for the innocent-and-accused as well, because if they did have a sexual encounter, they will now begin to severely doubt their own virtue, memory, and self-control. There's also the whiteknights and the females defending the "victim" to conside…
/r/MensRights22/01/15 09:59 PM
4

I hear them complain that men don't do enough housework, but they're fine when no one expects men to take care of their own kids.
/r/MensRights17/01/15 11:11 AM
9

Link to original blog post. http://dontneedfeminism.com
/r/MensRights14/01/15 07:14 PM
1

Anytime one of my mate posts a selfie, its always prefaced with "I know i don't ever do shit like this but..." or "I don't normally take selfies but..." My female friends just post away though. I've actually had to block a few for blowing up my feed with their face lol
/r/MensRights08/01/15 11:34 AM
40

right and then you guys walk back in with your list of 'bad things about wife being pregnant' after they finish up about how abusive husbands behave. Sounds like a set-up to me.
/r/MensRights08/01/15 11:29 AM
1

For what its worth, when I saw the video on facebook I used it as an example of how men aren't vile, and violent creatures, that if anything, the video just displays how boys want to treat women well. Still, that's probably anti-feminist-narrative.
/r/MensRights07/01/15 07:47 PM
1

Sadly this falls under the "teach boys not to rape." problem, where education isn't exactly going to dissolve the issue away. Violence and rape are both horrible horrible things, but you can never eradicate them completely and still expect to live in a free society.
/r/MensRights07/01/15 07:43 PM
1

Debunking them rationally for the benefit of third parties doesn't help either. Arguing with them rationally just lends them an appearance of credibility they don't deserve, because an adult is taking them seriously. This worked pretty well with the atheists vs. creationists thing. Ridicule has a place in a the public discourse, but it has to be used intelligently, because it works like a polarizer.
/r/MensRights21/12/14 03:28 PM
1

Seriously. Yeah, I know.. "feminists aren't rational, what do you expect? Etc."... but really... why? Does that just not count because no matter what, they are oppressed, and if there is a benefit then they just rationalize it by saying they have a right to class hatred as an oppressed group? Because when you've dehumanized your target, then anything is justified? This is what bothers me about feminism in a lot of ways, because not all women behave like they do, so I KNOW women are capable of be…
/r/MensRights21/12/14 03:24 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter