TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Cat_in_the_hat113 Archive

View 13 posts and 152 comments by Cat_in_the_hat113 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
131

DiscussionCat_in_the_hat113/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/22 05:19 PM
117

DiscussionCat_in_the_hat113/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/22 06:08 PM
83

DiscussionCat_in_the_hat113/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/22 02:59 PM
64

Social IssuesCat_in_the_hat113/r/MensRights19/09/22 07:51 PM
62

Social IssuesCat_in_the_hat113/r/MensRights21/09/22 03:23 PM
25

DiscussionCat_in_the_hat113/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/22 12:27 AM
25

GeneralCat_in_the_hat113/r/MensRights29/09/22 03:51 PM
20

GeneralCat_in_the_hat113/r/MensRights31/10/22 10:42 PM
15

GeneralCat_in_the_hat113/r/MensRights01/10/22 05:27 PM
2

DiscussionCat_in_the_hat113/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/22 04:28 PM
2

GeneralCat_in_the_hat113/r/MensRights10/10/22 07:09 PM
1

Social IssuesCat_in_the_hat113/r/MensRights24/09/22 05:55 PM
1

Social IssuesCat_in_the_hat113/r/MensRights05/10/22 04:03 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

The average OF earnings are $130 a month. And men have more average lifetime sexual partners than women. So is this just sour grapes at YOUR predicament?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/22 07:02 PM
1

source: trust me big dawg
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/22 07:01 PM
0

So many girls want to be ran through in their twenties The average number of lifetime sexual partners for a woman in the US is 4, in Europe it's like 7. What is "ran through"?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/22 06:58 PM
1

That's not going to happen, and is not any kind of priority.
/r/MensRights31/10/22 08:38 PM
1

Also men have really begun (with the help of MRA, Feminism, and MSM) to learn and react to the gynocentric culture that hates and vilifies them continuously. Lmao pure cope. 0 evidence of that anywhere. And if marriage is declining because men realize there’s nothing in it for them, why are men suffering from much greater rates of depression and suicidal ideation than women? And in terms of hookup culture, I thought the MRA position is that 80% of men get very little action as women just chase t…
/r/MensRights27/10/22 05:59 PM
1

You can say that about anyone. An attractive 38 year old woman will have plenty of men trying to lock her down whether in their 30s themselves or 40s or even 20s, especially if you operate on the basis that most women get no action or very limited and only the best looking men get any attractive women. Plenty of bottom 80% gonna trip over themselves to hand over their entire fortune for an attractive albeit slightly older woman.
/r/MensRights25/10/22 02:43 PM
1

Lol
/r/MensRights25/10/22 02:40 PM
1

Fortunately it's rapidly becoming unacceptable to be a slut. Huh?
/r/MensRights25/10/22 02:39 PM
1

Do you think your wife “settled” on you after being alpha widowed?
/r/MensRights25/10/22 04:18 AM
0

Are you under the impression that literally hundreds of men wouldn’t thirst after an attractive 38 year old woman? This is pure cope imo.
/r/MensRights25/10/22 04:15 AM
1

The gender ratio of most dating apps is literally 80% men and 20% women though. Of course women can be more selective and picky, but that’s what feeds it. MRAs constantly ignore it, then complain about their views not being mainstream. You should be looking at why the ratio is what it is, and addressing that.
/r/MensRights25/10/22 04:15 AM
2

Lmaooo go ahead and list any that you think prove an aspect of TRP worldview. Aside from you seemingly being excited to “prove” an ideology that shows you are expressly losing and suck, I’m curious to see what you have that all other RPers seem to not. Because all I see from them is that 2005 OKCupid study and a 2015 tinder study on swipes with no regard for the gender ratio on said dating apps.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/22 05:45 PM
1

Young to middle aged here meant 25-54. As dating apps have been around for 15 years or so, they'd have been in their mid-to-late 30s LATEST when they began, and thus influenced by the culture. Where's the evidence to support your worldview? Fact is TRP has nothing. An OkCupid study from 2005 on pure attractiveness where you only focus on 1 part of it and a Tinder study from 2015 on who gets the most swipes on a single dating app where men are 80% of all users is the sum total of what you folks h…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/22 04:51 PM
1

The big picture is that 62% of young to middle aged adults are either married or living with a partner. 72% of young men are having sex, and it goes up in the 30+ years. What does the Red Pill or Black Pill have to explain or justify that?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/22 04:10 PM
5

People are having less sex yes. But as the UK and other studies show, there is not a major gap between the amount of men and women going sexless.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/22 03:31 PM
2

Bro TRP twists the 80/20 nonsense whenever it’s scrutinized to try and keep the false reality going. The fact is that unlike in that upvoted comment from link 1, it is NOT traditionally used to say that 80% of women are attracted to 20% of men but go for a greater variety so most end up getting some even they aren’t the main source of attraction to women. It’s used to literally say 80% of men get no sex whatsoever unless they bite the bullet and go for some grotesque or obese “bottom 20%” girl. …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/22 03:30 PM
2

Bro what? The WaPo study TRP deifies was self reported, and I don’t see you taking issue with it. In fact, not only was it self reported, IT CAME FROM THE EXACT SAME SOURCE! So if you had no issue with the first one but have major issues with this year’s since it doesn’t fit your narrative, perhaps take stock of your own biases for why you keep losing.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/22 03:21 PM
1

“Natural, evolutionary biology”
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/22 03:20 PM
1

OMG this is the most spot on comment I’ve ever read! Killed the Red Pill stone dead.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/22 03:15 PM
0

The red pill only has one play. Say something with no evidence, and when questioned refer to your ‘gut feeling’, ‘my eyes’ or ‘it just seems likely’.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/22 10:04 PM
1

Why men are having sex less frequently Not men, young adults. The byline refers to men and women. 1 in 3 young men reported no sexual activity in the last year Ahh the 2018 GSS study. According to the 2021 version, women caught up. https://i.imgur.com/HGlnCTJ.png
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/22 09:44 PM
3

It’s actually less, Gen Z is notoriously sex averse compared to previous generations https://www.the-sun.com/lifestyle/4479617/average-number-sexual-partners-generation/amp/.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/22 09:39 PM
2

The fact that 62% of adults aged 25-54 are either married or living with a long term partner. The fact that 70% of young men and more of older men have had sex in the past year. All the real world evidence shows that none of the Red Pill theories from hypergamy to women only dating “Chads” etc are in any way real. Unless you posit that the majority of men are like that.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/22 08:04 PM
1

Fine points but by no metric were people in the USSR and Nazi Germany happy? Most weren’t, while most in Sweden are.
/r/MensRights23/10/22 07:46 PM
3

How convenient that “anecdotes” line up without any actual evidence. Gravity isn’t just a theory, it’s been tested and proven. A theory that sounds cute but not only has no evidence but actually evidence that disproves it is not a theory. It’s bullshit.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/22 07:44 PM
1

OK, no evidence it happens in practice in the real world though. 70% of young men and more older are having sex, 60%+ married or living with a partner.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/22 07:43 PM
2

Some random anecdotes is not indicative of the general population though.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/22 07:38 PM
2

You don’t.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/22 03:28 PM
4

He can’t have sex and is angry about it
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/22 03:27 PM
1

The pseudo intellectualism like this with no evidence from listening to Andy Tate and Jordan Peterson on loop is why incels can’t get laid lol
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/22 03:25 PM
1

Bro women live longer and happier single than married. Put a sock in it, only sad and depressed people will be the ones sad and depressed being single today. The men.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/22 03:24 PM
1

Getting more difficult for most men to get sex? Women only going for Chads? Cite your sources buddy.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/22 03:23 PM
6

When the average number of sexual partners a woman has in her lifetime is 7-8 in Europe and 4 in the US, what’s a “hoe phase”?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/22 02:55 PM
1

Lol none of this is gonna ever even remotely happen. If that’s the only solution, prepare to fail permanently and forever is what I’d say. Any other more feasible ideas?
/r/MensRights23/10/22 02:31 PM
1

Curious, these countries have some of the highest rates of happiness and quality of life in the world. Why do you think that is then?
/r/MensRights23/10/22 02:25 PM
3

Women have always been more selective. You can look at ancient DNA studies (e.g. mitochondrial DNA studies) to realize women have always been selective, and most men died without having progeny source?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/22 05:56 PM
4

Post the data then. All I've seen is that the actual gender ratio on these apps is 75-80% men compared to just 20-25% women. So of course women can be more selective.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/22 05:36 PM
5

It’s just that with modern technology + female empowerment, women have the freedom to exclusively fuck the hot men Cite your sources that women are only fucking the arbitrary definition of "hot" men.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/22 05:15 PM
2

What is the useful half in your eyes?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/22 05:14 PM
3

No it isn't lmao so if she has 2 partners but says she has 1 she's "suppressing 50% of her sexual partners"? You just want to make the numbers seem much more inflated, when you yourself have 0 evidence that women are highly promiscuous as you want to claim.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/22 02:59 PM
6

That wasn't the real number. Polygraphs aren't real what lmao? They literally establish that in terms of raw numbers, the gap isn't large at all. And no the difference wasn't small proportionally. So if a woman has had 5 partners and said she had 3, she's "LYING BY 40%!!!11!" ?? Lol way to attempt to manipulate data.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/22 02:49 PM
2

The study is from 2003 which is a totally different time. And even then, the reported gap between the real number and reported one is small.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/22 02:13 PM
3

In a topic women have been proven to lie down about. Source?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/22 01:32 PM
-1

Yet you commented. Saddest attempt to bail yet. All the same with Red Pillers. Ask for sources and they go running.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/22 01:31 PM
2

Lmao I thought so
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/22 04:50 AM
1

Cite your sources.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/22 04:36 AM
5

And according to the 2021 version of the same report, women have equaled men in sexlessness. Red Pill talking bullshit as ever.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/22 04:34 AM
2

There's been a couple of studies(pre-pandemic mostly) that showed the number of sexless men rising, yet the number of women being sexually active remains roughly the same Such absolute bullshit. You’re referring to the 2018 GSS study quoted in the Washington Post in 2019. Not “studies”, ONE study. And the 2021 GSS report showed that women have caught up to men in sexlessness, rendering your theory nonsense. It was also ONLY a study of men and women 18-30, not men and women as a whole. So many th…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/22 04:33 AM
4

What are you talking about? Have you not been on this sub in recent months? The dating app disparity is down to dating apps having gender ratios that are 75%+ male in terms of users, and outside of dating apps in real life 62% of US adults aged 25-54 are either married or living with a long term partner. There’s no such thing as an 80/20 rule, or chads, or cock carousels. The average number of sexual partners for a woman in the US is just over 4, while for men it’s 6. You seem to be on some sort…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/22 04:31 AM
-11

Do you believe that only the Red Pill is inherently tied to Men’s Rights ideology?
/r/MensRights05/10/22 09:14 PM
-3

Post a single source that supports what you just said. Just one. Because numerous high profile ones say the opposite ie https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/why-bad-looks-good/202102/why-many-single-women-without-children-are-so-happy?amp.
/r/MensRights05/10/22 05:58 PM
6

Curious what your source(s) are for the happiest when single and childless because the studies I remember say the opposite Major source recently for example: https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/why-bad-looks-good/202102/why-many-single-women-without-children-are-so-happy?amp
/r/MensRights05/10/22 05:30 PM
-6

But…men do care. Men suffer from much higher rates of depression and suicidal ideation when alone and sexually inactive, and most incels are men.
/r/MensRights05/10/22 04:50 PM
0

Primarily because the group that can make the the biggest difference today views responsibility as slavery. Who is that? Also, the BLM riots were laced with ideas of racial justice and part of why it was hard for police to mow them down was BECAUSE they partly revolved around police brutality against black people AND because most of the country supported them at the time. If you think a group of angry young, mostly white men running around trying to cause similar carnage because they aren't havi…
/r/MensRights05/10/22 04:34 PM
-12

Psych experts have put it down to women being slightly happier decades ago because the domestic housewife thing was all they ever knew and didn't want more because they didn't think they could get it, but then opening up opportunities in the wider workforce saw them inherit the typical struggles of a working man as well as forcing them to confront uncomfortable ideas about their prior happy little housewife life being a tool of oppression. But I accept that that is open to interpretation and MRA…
/r/MensRights05/10/22 04:29 PM
1

Do you think there are any mainstream challenges to feminism or growth in Men's Rights ideology? Or do you mean more so online?
/r/MensRights05/10/22 04:04 PM
1

Few things are more destructive for a society than hopeless men. In the old days maybe. Today they can just be mass incarcerated or put down if they start causing major crimes. Because ultimately, there are no solutions to so many men wanting girlfriends and not getting them. Only avenue would be ending democracy in the First World and instituting dictatorships with forced monogamy, and I don't see that happening.
/r/MensRights05/10/22 03:29 PM
0

That explains why about 10% of guys on dating apps get almost all of the interest. No, the 90/10 male to female gender ratio of users on these apps (80/20 in the US) explains it.
/r/MensRights05/10/22 03:27 PM
-21

Women are statistically happiest chidfree and single, and single unmarried women are starting to out-earn men. You're saying the odd heartbreak over "Chad" after lots of sex is bad, but overall aren't women charting the best path forward for themselves even if it leaves men in the dust?
/r/MensRights05/10/22 03:25 PM
-4

This comment and the one you replied to are why the MRM has no credibility and you keep losing.
/r/MensRights02/10/22 04:13 PM
1

Certain circles of men have been saying that for like 100 years. You're just getting introduced as part of the batch this go round.
/r/MensRights02/10/22 12:25 AM
5

Meeting online doesn't mean a dating app though, in fact the study specified only 20% met off of dating apps in particular, and that was based on data from when the apps had better ratios. I don't see how that 20% that met through apps a few years ago doesn't crater in future though with these ratios. I'm sure a good chunk will still meet online though via Instagram, Snapchat, online chat rooms, Facebook etc
/r/MensRights01/10/22 07:42 PM
1

What are your solutions to either?
/r/MensRights01/10/22 05:19 PM
1

Any evidence for this? Of course not. Cite a single source.
/r/MensRights30/09/22 09:39 PM
2

Why men allways need to waste time to fixing themself? Because men are the depressed and frustrated ones over it. Women aren't complaining, and if they did it'd be their problem too.
/r/MensRights30/09/22 09:10 PM
1

Dating apps have been studied and it does appear that 80% of women target only the top 10% of men, leaving the rest of men with little to no options. Nope, there's just next to no women on dating apps. In Europe, men are 90% of Tinder users and 80% of Bumble users https://www.netimperative.com/2019/04/05/online-dating-trends-men-outnumber-women-on-tinder-by-9-to-1-while-grinder-wins-for-age-diversity/. In the US, men are 78% of Tinder users https://datingzest.com/tinder-statistics/ and almost 70…
/r/MensRights30/09/22 08:41 PM
1

What current situation?
/r/MensRights30/09/22 08:38 PM
1

Date down in wealth maybe, which...yeah, as men earn more than women. However, men don't often shoot for dating down in looks.
/r/MensRights30/09/22 08:37 PM
1

I believe the post references a Washington Post article a few years back that showed 28% of men 18-30 and 18% of women 18-30 hadn't had sex in the past year. A quite bizarre framing of it since of course a chunk of each might not be looking for sex or open to it at the time, and 72% of young men as well as 82% of young women having sex isn't a sign of some sort of widespread celibacy crises.
/r/MensRights30/09/22 08:35 PM
1

The fact that this is getting upvoted and is likely to reach the top of the sub is gonna make it look even worse. It's not even some nothing post languishing 18th in the cue on 10 upvotes and 5 comments to be dismissed.
/r/MensRights30/09/22 08:29 PM
1

So what do you think is the solution? Because it feels like most are ready to just mow them down or mass institutionalize them at this point.
/r/MensRights30/09/22 08:15 PM
1

Either way, they may want girlfriends, but they aren't getting them. So either they focus on making themselves desirable to a woman, focus on something else, or they're out of luck.
/r/MensRights30/09/22 08:10 PM
-16

it should be no surprise there's a growing pool of men at the bottom who find it more and more difficult to find any kind of romantic relationship. OK but there's nothing to be done there. They can work on themselves to the point they are desirable, or they're bang out of luck. Focus on something else. Or get a prostitute.
/r/MensRights30/09/22 08:09 PM
-6

Sure, but if they can get it, they get it. If men can get it a girlfriend, they can. If they can't, they're out of luck and that's that.
/r/MensRights30/09/22 08:07 PM
-23

if you pretend a basic human need doesn't even matter Do you mean sex? If so, what do you propose be done about it? Force people to sleep with them? Don't expect people to keep playing by the rules OK, and then they'll continue to be broken down, crushed and ostracized as their lives lurch from one complete failure to the next. They're just breaking down amongst themselves and stewing in most Western countries, while being increasingly banned and boxed into the smallest amount of places where th…
/r/MensRights30/09/22 05:39 PM
-44

They just wanted a fucking girlfriend, man, that's all. And they are not even remotely entitled to have one at any point in their lives. Ever. Nobody is. This is what they seem to not understand.
/r/MensRights30/09/22 04:48 PM
6

So what are your options then? Gruesome poverty in Latin America, food insecurity in the Caribbean or a borderline 19th century standard of living in most places in Africa?
/r/MensRights30/09/22 04:45 PM
6

He means hardline conservatives that probably consider those regions "unwoke" and would be willing to move there for that and compromise on the far lower quality of life and greater rates of violence and poverty.
/r/MensRights30/09/22 04:44 PM
1

Europeans and North Americans do not want to move to Latin America by any statistical measure lol where are you getting that from? What you're referring to are social conservatives on forums like this, Gab, Stormfront etc that might consider those regions "the last bastions of the UnWoke" or something and be willing to move there for the values and accept the lower quality of life, far greater rates of violence, poverty and brutal corruption as tradeoff. The only problem with that is, a lot of t…
/r/MensRights30/09/22 04:41 PM
1

Yep, lick Dan Blizerian's ass when he's a roided up circus freak with a breaking down heart at 35 that literally paid for women to beef up his image to feed off desperate, sad young men. Lick Andrew Tate's ass when he's a failed D-list UFC fighter that claims he's worth billions when he's worth like 200K and fled the U.S. to Romania because, in his words, it's easier to get away with rape there. He was then busted in a sex trafficking sting where they found multiple women held hostage in his hou…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/22 03:33 AM
3

Only unsuccessful incels preach that nonsense because they can't get laid imo
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/22 03:29 AM
1

One line and a chuckle, because that's all it was worth
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/22 05:47 PM
1

The one that showed 72% of young men and 82% of young women having had sex in the past year from when it was gathered (believe it was 2017)?! You're using a study that showed 72% of young men having sex, to claim 50% of men AREN'T having sex???
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/22 05:44 PM
2

My dating life is fine lmao and if it’s an anonymous forum, why get so defensive and so desperate to defend yourself? 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/22 04:15 PM
8

r/thathappened
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/22 03:32 PM
0

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gab_(social_network)
/r/MensRights27/09/22 02:40 PM
1

It gets worse on Tinder. 78/22 men to women in the US, 90/10 men to women in Europe lol
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/22 02:37 PM
-1

Isn't it a little weird how this Men's Rights space always suggests very right wing places to go post? I mean, isn't Gab run by a Nazi and directly linked to the 2018 Pittsburgh Synagogue shooting? Would you say Men's Rights is a right-wing movement?
/r/MensRights27/09/22 02:34 PM
-1

Isn't it a little weird how this Men's Rights space always suggests very right wing places to go post? I mean, isn't Gab run by a Nazi and directly linked to the 2018 Pittsburgh Synagogue shooting? Would you say Men's Rights is a right-wing movement?
/r/MensRights27/09/22 02:34 PM
-1

I’m sorry but what are the right more likely to agree with? The left push for women to register for the draft, Republicans constantly block it. The left push for paid family leave for men and women, Republicans constantly block it. The left pushes to abolish private prisons and take on the “War on Drugs” rhetoric that has incarcerated millions of men, Republicans constantly block it however they can. When you say the right are more sympathetic, do you just mean they’re more likely to not dismiss…
/r/MensRights25/09/22 01:42 PM
1

Do you consider only OAN and Newsmax to be right of center?
/r/MensRights25/09/22 01:39 PM
0

The left support women registering for the draft. Republicans constantly block it.
/r/MensRights25/09/22 01:38 PM
2

What do you think will happen?
/r/MensRights21/09/22 07:25 PM
1

How so? And what do these experts say will happen?
/r/MensRights21/09/22 07:25 PM
10

They found out that high tech industries pays women more than men for the same job! source?
/r/MensRights19/09/22 07:56 PM
0

You also forgot to mention, this is only in 22/250 major metropolitan areas https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2022/03/28/young-women-are-out-earning-young-men-in-several-u-s-cities/.
/r/MensRights19/09/22 07:55 PM
-3

Feels like the tide has turned against him since the trial tbh
/r/MensRights16/09/22 04:13 PM
2

Which one? Here are some sources and studies: https://www.elle.com.au/health-fitness/single-women-happy-study-20582 https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2019/may/25/women-happier-without-children-or-a-spouse-happiness-expert Where are they debunked and disproved?
/r/MensRights16/09/22 04:11 PM
1

That's just a sexist generalization and partly why the MRM has no influence. Cut it out. Tons of sources and studies out there that single women are happiest and live longest single: https://www.elle.com.au/health-fitness/single-women-happy-study-20582.
/r/MensRights16/09/22 04:10 PM
-4

Tons of sources on it ie https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2019/may/25/women-happier-without-children-or-a-spouse-happiness-expert https://www.elle.com.au/health-fitness/single-women-happy-study-20582
/r/MensRights16/09/22 04:08 PM
-31

The article literally says more women live in poverty than men in spite of this increase...
/r/MensRights16/09/22 03:32 AM
-74

Studies show women are happiest single. Who says they want a partner? Could just want a career and casual sex, as we are seeing more and more.
/r/MensRights16/09/22 03:32 AM
1

...based on what sources? And even if they did, what would that have to do with Men's Rights?
/r/MensRights12/09/22 02:45 PM
1

So is Chad and belief in Chad actually part of Men’s Rights Activism ideology? Interested to know as I don’t see what a random woman’s complaints about a relationship has to do with men’s rights as a whole.
/r/MensRights12/09/22 02:10 PM
2

Also, we are 80% of suicides and homelessness When you look at the raw figures though, homelessness and suicide combined affects less than 0.5% of all men https://www.reddit.com/r/AskFeminists/comments/vigu0c/men_being_the_majority_of_homeless_people_and/. So it's not exactly a systemic issue plaguing large amounts of men, which is probably why it's a hard sell for MRAs to try and take men's issues into the mainstream based on it, as very few if any men will personally relate.
/r/MensRights09/09/22 08:18 PM
-2

Echo chamber? I thought feminists controlled all levers of society and were the dominant voice in the mainstream. Anyways, do appreciate the back-and-forth.
/r/MensRights09/09/22 12:40 AM
-2

The New York post is not a legitimate or reliable source.
/r/MensRights09/09/22 12:22 AM
-2

The claim that women make more than men in 147/150 major US cities was never backed up. And studies show it’s nowhere close to the truth. It’s actually 22 out of 250 https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2022/03/28/young-women-are-out-earning-young-men-in-several-u-s-cities/.
/r/MensRights09/09/22 12:21 AM
-27

And what percent of American women are childless vs not? Men still earn 20% more than women on average, and these stats were before COVID. On top of that, it doesn't prove women make more in 147 of 150 major US cities, which is just straight up made up.
/r/MensRights08/09/22 04:25 PM
-29

And this is why the MRM is treated as a joke. That is just literally not true and the fact you'll never provide a source for it, like the OP didn't, is telling.
/r/MensRights08/09/22 04:24 PM
-5

Other perspective: what percent of men are actually homeless? The U.S. for example has 330 million people, and just 600,000 of them are homeless. Even if 80% of those are men, that's not even close to 1% of the male population there.
/r/MensRights08/09/22 03:04 AM
1

Based on the policies of all the parties. Right wing parties in civilized countries will often support things like improvements in healthcare, infrastructure, transition to SOME kind of more sustainable future if not Green Energy (say Nuclear), will support safety net benefits for children or elders if not the general populace, and drive mainstream consensus on abortion bans for an average elective period of 10-12 weeks followed by greater restrictions. Republicans in the U.S. want to ban gay an…
/r/MensRights07/09/22 02:10 PM
3

Bro, Elon absolutely does not lurk on this sub, and the only other MRA spaces would be on places like Truth Social and whatnot lol can't see that either.
/r/MensRights07/09/22 02:00 PM
1

My understanding is that what is term right wing is just center according to who? based on what? The right wing in America is much farther right than the right wing in any other First World country, it's closer to the baseline of Iran/Saudi Arabia than it is Spain/Portugal/England.
/r/MensRights07/09/22 01:55 PM
1

Who cares? In the same study most of the woman still said they'd hook up with someone they found unattractive as looks wasn't the primary factor in selecting a mate, and even if they didn't, how would this one random study on preference from an obscure dating app in the mid-00s correlate to what women go for in real life? It sounds like little more than incel justification.
/r/MensRights07/09/22 01:54 PM
0

In what sense are women waking up to it? It doesn’t even exist anyways. There’s always been lots of men that can’t get laid. Now they congregate online together and make up reasons for it, like this nonsense with 0 evidence for it that seems to revolve around a survey by OK Cupid done in 2005 where women rated just 20% of men attractive and men rated 80% of women attractive. Forget that the same study showed 60% of women saying they’d date a man they didn’t find attractive if he made up for it i…
/r/MensRights04/09/22 06:11 AM
1

"Between 1980 and 2008–2012, educational assortative mating reversed from a tendency for women to marry up to a tendency for women to marry down in education, whereas the tendency for women to marry men with higher incomes than themselves persisted." So women don't mind if a man is less well educated than them, but still want him to make more? Interesting, but this is also 2012 data ie before the working class whether well earning or not became extremely right-wing, and now increasigly alt-right…
/r/MensRights03/09/22 06:08 PM
3

it seems they’re undoing the work feminism has achieved in the past. In what sense? I agree the movement has not achieved much of late though.
/r/MensRights03/09/22 05:57 PM
3

90% of colledge educated women date up in wealth? Almost every one? Gonna need a source on that. The fact that stuff like this is peddled without ANY sources EVER on this sub is a big part of why the MRM is seen the way it is in mainstream circles imo
/r/MensRights03/09/22 05:37 PM
27

Feminism is getting more unpopular? Where?
/r/MensRights03/09/22 05:34 PM
1

But we aren't the Middle East. Women keep growing and thriving in Western culture from an earning, career growth and sex-when-they-want-it standpoint.
/r/MensRights27/08/22 09:14 PM
-5

childless young women outearn childless young men No they don't lmao you're talking about a select few major American cities, and the gap entirely reverses past 30. This has also been going on for like 15 years+.
/r/MensRights08/08/22 09:14 PM
1

as are minorities (minorities in white countries, globally they are a majority). Globally, as in white countries, they all live in poverty though https://ourworldindata.org/uploads/2021/03/The-global-inc-distribution-190-10-30-1536x959.png. Unlike whites in the First World. Hence the protection.
/r/MensRights06/08/22 09:35 PM
-5

Where is the apex fallacy? You can say this doesn’t include most men, which it doesn’t, but people here reference men being most suicides and homeless people to say men as a whole are struggling when those stats encompass less than 0.5% of all men https://www.reddit.com/r/AskFeminists/comments/vigu0c/men_being_the_majority_of_homeless_people_and/. Isn’t that an apex fallacy but in reverse?
/r/MensRights30/07/22 12:53 AM
0

Men in America have it worse? https://www.reddit.com/r/TwoXChromosomes/comments/t9n4qr/a_reminder_that_men_in_america_are_73_of_national/ Scandinavia I guess you could argue. Maybe Australia/NZ. But everywhere else men dominate and that’s of little dispute, surely.
/r/MensRights29/07/22 10:48 PM
-20

False https://www.reddit.com/r/TwoXChromosomes/comments/p896k3/men_still_run_89_of_countries_81_of_all_companies/. Is this some sort of Stockholm Syndrome? I can accept an argument for “both have it bad in different ways” but men having it worse than women? Yikes. In what way?
/r/MensRights29/07/22 10:47 PM
-2

Men are killing themselves in record numbers through suicide. Suicide effects less than 0.3% of all men https://www.reddit.com/r/AskFeminists/comments/vigu0c/men_being_the_majority_of_homeless_people_and/. Hardly a systemic issue.
/r/MensRights28/07/22 06:21 PM
0

You aren't worth a source lol women control the economic and educational realm by a huge majority But...I just showed you that they dont tho...
/r/MensRights03/05/22 02:08 PM
0

I know personally that I'd much rather have this real, tangible victory All fair points, but how much of a win will this be if Dems use this to win the midterms and then codify abortion until birth nationwide as federal law?
/r/MensRights03/05/22 06:52 AM
1

I mean this is consistent across ALL polls and ALL sources: https://www.cnn.com/2022/01/21/politics/cnn-poll-abortion-roe-v-wade/index.html https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2019/08/29/u-s-public-continues-to-favor-legal-abortion-oppose-overturning-roe-v-wade/ https://news.gallup.com/poll/350804/americans-opposed-overturning-roe-wade.aspx https://www.wpr.org/poll-most-americans-oppose-overturning-roe-v-wade-split-new-abortion-restrictions Is everyone lying? Only your unsubstantiated personal …
/r/MensRights03/05/22 06:37 AM
0

What 50% of Americans that are pro life? https://www.wpr.org/poll-most-americans-oppose-overturning-roe-v-wade-split-new-abortion-restrictions Get your head out of 1987. A majority of REPUBLICAN VOTERS by some polls support Roe, never mind Democrats!
/r/MensRights03/05/22 05:20 AM
5

I mean I will. Watch the polls all magically change from next week on as this becomes a national issue. 75% of Americans, including a plurality of Republicans, now support Roe and abortion protections. Nobody but religious right wing Christian fundamentalists support overturning it. Only chance Rs have is if it doesn't become a national issue and fades into the background with inflation, supply issues etc but that's unlikely as most major Dems are already talking about it, prospective Dem senate…
/r/MensRights03/05/22 04:39 AM
0

Republicans can now ban abortion nationwide via federal law if they get elected. They will never win another election cycle again.
/r/MensRights03/05/22 04:13 AM
-2

Any party can now ban or mass expand abortions nationwide via federal law now that it’s lost it’s mandated constitutional protections. Dems can codify a 40 week elective abortion period in every state tomorrow, republicans could ban it nationwide if they got it through the house, senate and a president signed it. Nobody will ever vote republicans in again now that they could ban abortion nationwide with a majority vote.
/r/MensRights03/05/22 04:12 AM
-26

This sub is a coded far right one for primarily white grievance politics. It’s not really for “men’s rights”, I mean how much activism do you see people do here in terms of rallying public officials, lobbying, setting up marches for causes or awareness campaigns etc?
/r/MensRights03/05/22 04:10 AM
-3

Are you kidding me? Nobody cares about men’s lack of “reproductive rights” in the mainstream, this is just gonna supercharge the left to absolutely crush the republicans in the midterms and then go to work on a big left wing agenda. 75% of the country strongly supports Roe. Only the religious fundamentalist right oppose it now.
/r/MensRights03/05/22 04:09 AM
-4

Lmao this argument is going to get eviscerated starting tomorrow onwards. Any party can now ban or enforce it nationwide by federal law, as it’s no longer constitutionally protected.
/r/MensRights03/05/22 04:08 AM
-1

Women make 77% of what men do as the global average. If being a prostitute paid them far more than men, why wouldn’t they all do it?
/r/MensRights03/05/22 01:32 AM
-1

What do hungry women do?
/r/MensRights02/05/22 10:49 PM
-4

So why are there less women in STEM today than in the 80s? Why haven’t they made the numbers up?
/r/MensRights02/05/22 09:56 PM
0

Uhh, it’s consistent throughout all of human history. And why focus on the West? Outside the west is where typically it’s been most brutal.
/r/MensRights02/05/22 09:55 PM
-3

Yes, there’s always been oppression and it continues in force today https://www.reddit.com/r/TwoXChromosomes/comments/p896k3/men_still_run_89_of_countries_81_of_all_companies/. You can live in this little bubble and deny it all you want, but there’s a reason your views will never be mainstream and will never be taken seriously in an academic or professional setting. How does that make you feel?
/r/MensRights02/05/22 09:54 PM
-1

Not only has there always been, it’s ongoing https://www.reddit.com/r/TwoXChromosomes/comments/p896k3/men_still_run_89_of_countries_81_of_all_companies/. There’s a reason MRA views will never be mainstream, but these are.
/r/MensRights02/05/22 09:52 PM
-1

How are men being oppressed today? https://www.reddit.com/r/TwoXChromosomes/comments/p896k3/men_still_run_89_of_countries_81_of_all_companies/
/r/MensRights02/05/22 09:51 PM
-1

Native Americans are 1% of the population
/r/MensRights02/05/22 09:51 PM
-7

https://www.reddit.com/r/TwoXChromosomes/comments/p896k3/men_still_run_89_of_countries_81_of_all_companies/
/r/MensRights02/05/22 09:49 PM
-8

Who is making men be sewer cleaners?
/r/MensRights02/05/22 09:48 PM
-3

Where 70% of university staff is women. Where education boards are 80% women Source? women have more power in the economic and educational realm. https://www.reddit.com/r/TwoXChromosomes/comments/p896k3/men_still_run_89_of_countries_81_of_all_companies/
/r/MensRights02/05/22 09:46 PM
-15

There’s no need to rebut MRA views though. They’ll never be mainstream and never have credibility, because they are all based on a lie https://www.reddit.com/r/TwoXChromosomes/comments/p896k3/men_still_run_89_of_countries_81_of_all_companies/.
/r/MensRights02/05/22 09:45 PM
1

an old animated cartoon?
/r/MensRights18/04/22 05:13 PM
-1

Can you give some examples? Because most major movies seem to always be geared for men. Also, how long would you say this dynamic has been going on? Was Hollywood all about feminism say 20 years ago, in 2002?
/r/MensRights15/04/22 06:38 PM
-3

Can you give some examples of this dynamic from tv shows or movies you've seen? Specifically the buff black man coming in to save the day? Because this just seems like raging alt-right racism disguised as discourse and why the MRA movement isn't taken seriously. The most common interracial relationship btw is white men and hispanic women.
/r/MensRights15/04/22 06:37 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter