| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | Why so many young Democratic men think feminism is causing harmUmmm.... ....because it is? | /r/MensRights | 08/06/22 01:29 PM |
| 1 | AOC called out for divisive comments about patriarchy and anti-masculinity after Texas school shootingTheir is a difference between saying men are running the country and the people running the country are men, men as a gender aren't running shit, they are as miserable as anyone else. Patriarchy implies by men, for men. But rich men don't care about poor men, not because they are men but because the rich never care about the poor. If all races, genders, and orientations, were equally represented in the rich, they would still shit on the poor just as much. It isn't men or "whiteness" that is the … | /r/MensRights | 01/06/22 05:06 PM |
| 2 | Could the Johhny Depp and Amber Heard court case help bring a voice to mens' rights?Maybe he doesn't care. Hollywood tends to be self centered tools. | /r/MensRights | 30/05/22 01:25 AM |
| 2 | Could the Johhny Depp and Amber Heard court case help bring a voice to mens' rights?MRA's are the ONLY ones who supported Johnny's right to be innocent until proven guilty, before this trial. But do you think Johnny will even give MRA's the slightest nod? Not bloody likely. | /r/MensRights | 29/05/22 06:18 PM |
| 0 | A "FEMINIST" tries to explain why 'Public is wrong about Depp v Heard case'Before the agricultural revolution about 10k years ago, this was the way of things. The top 10% of men got all the women, and by top 10% I mean athletes, not rich nerds because wealth didn't really exist before agriculture. This modern "everyone gets a virgin" sexual socialism, started when agriculture started. Birth control ended this, and we are back to our natural state. Many animals are like this, with only the "alphas" getting all the women and the rest get leftover women once the alphas ar… | /r/MensRights | 28/05/22 04:36 PM |
| 2 | A "FEMINIST" tries to explain why 'Public is wrong about Depp v Heard case'You are trying to make it out as if you are gonna save women from themselves. That is nonsense. You haven't broken your internalized chivalry yet. You NEED to feel pro woman even as they destroy you. STOP, just stop. Women aren't just dopey confused girls against themselves, feminism serves their interests. They only make up their oppression to play on men's internalized chivalry, EVERY male feminist is really just a chivalrist. Weather or not you think feminism is good for women is beside the p… | /r/MensRights | 28/05/22 12:08 PM |
| 0 | A "FEMINIST" tries to explain why 'Public is wrong about Depp v Heard case'Unfortunately it IS a zero sum game. It isn't just radical feminists, sadly it isn't even just feminists, it's ALL WOMEN. Remember 10 years ago when Katherine Becker cut her husband's dick off and threw it in the garbage disposer? ALL WOMEN THOUGHT IT WAS FUNNY! So, respectfully, FUCK DECENCY! | /r/MensRights | 28/05/22 03:28 AM |
| 7 | A "FEMINIST" tries to explain why 'Public is wrong about Depp v Heard case'They don't hate women for being women, they hate women they perceive as gender traitors. Like Nazis hate whites they perceive as race traitors. | /r/MensRights | 28/05/22 03:08 AM |
| 19 | A "FEMINIST" tries to explain why 'Public is wrong about Depp v Heard case'I KNEW someone would bring this up. Yes, men have personally killed women who disrespected or harmed them, but first, they had to do it themselves, society wasn't going to do shit for the abused/disrespected man. And second, society very quickly will kill/severly punish that man barring some kind of supreme privilege like a king or billionaire. | /r/MensRights | 27/05/22 04:32 PM |
| 13 | A "FEMINIST" tries to explain why 'Public is wrong about Depp v Heard case'THIS! Men have always deleted the genes of other men who threatened women, hell men happily deleted the genes of other men merely for disrespecting women, nobody ever deleted the genes of women who harmed men, or even boys. | /r/MensRights | 27/05/22 04:09 PM |
| 35 | A "FEMINIST" tries to explain why 'Public is wrong about Depp v Heard case'STOP, just stop. Stop trying to act like feminists will be nice to us if we are nice to them. You want to see radical feminism, look up r/fourthwavewomen . Feminism is female chauvinism. That is what they are. | /r/MensRights | 27/05/22 04:05 PM |
| 1 | There is an influx of fake accounts posting faux misogynist content hereWe don't need to walk on eggshells to avoid looking sexist, women, especially feminist women, certainly don't walk on egg shells to avoid being sexist. Feminists will call MRAs misogynists no matter what, because the very idea that men are in any way disadvantaged compared to women is misogyny to them. Feminists will call anyone misogynists for any slight disagreement with any part of their doctrine. Women are ridiculously overly emotional. | /r/MensRights | 25/05/22 03:44 PM |
| 16 | There is an influx of fake accounts posting faux misogynist content hereNo they don't, they wholeheartedly believe they are right. People form beliefs on feelings not facts, for women this is doubly so. | /r/MensRights | 24/05/22 10:33 PM |
| 5 | Double standardsYeah, Stonetoss is pretty far right, I don't like or agree with it, but occasionally he does make some excellent points that stand out from his usual nonsense. | /r/MensRights | 17/05/22 01:51 PM |
| 5 | Question for you guysIf you bothered to listen we've been waiting for RISUG/Vasalgel FOREVER! But pharmaceutical companies don't want it because it will cause women in committed relationships to drop their $60 a month birth control. Edit: spelled vasalgel vasogel. | /r/MensRights | 12/05/22 03:18 PM |
| 5 | These posts about abortion and the whole "why aren't men getting angry with us" facade is getting old. I think we should all help each other but it's a BIT hypocritical when our rights get laughed about by women.False, try circumcision your infant daughter, see what happens. | /r/MensRights | 12/05/22 02:57 PM |
| -3 | UK: Calling a man 'bald' is sex harassment after employment tribunal compares it to commenting on a woman's breastsI'm no Jewish scholar, but I'm fairly certain nobody in the bronze age thought of 35 year olds as 'youths'. Also, nobody threatened anyone, and nobody was in a gang. The bears were female not mothers, and they killed youths because abrahamic morality is moronic. | /r/MensRights | 12/05/22 02:17 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter