TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Cavannah Archive

View 0 posts and 927 comments by Cavannah on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
10

That's actually a good one for baseline long-term commitment criteria in response to the 6-6-6-6 "ideal" (6 figure salary, 6 feet tall, 6-pack abs, 6" endowment). Zero kids Zero tattoos Zero debt Zero drugs Not sure how you'd work in "not overweight" and "not insufferable" as bonus qualifiers, but it's a good starting point.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen02/10/22 07:08 PM
130

The Princess' Paradigm: "I have a problem. Everybody who I want doesn't want me, and I don't want the people who want me. I refuse to modify my standards but also refuse to accept that others can have standards that disqualify me. This is everyone else's fault."
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen01/10/22 12:04 AM
78

Person plays in traffic and is shocked when they get hit by a car. More at 11.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen24/09/22 04:06 PM
95

1) Define "treat you right." There is no end to the amount of toxicity associated with someone using that phrase as a catch-all reason to get whatever they want. Oh, he's not bending over backwards to be a live-in male servant while you get to just lay around after mentally reducing your responsibilities to zero and increasing your demands to infinity because mommy dearest just wants and wants and wants? Clearly he isn't "treating you right," Queen. 2) Don't even start with your inane complainin…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen24/09/22 04:04 PM
4

You seem insecure about your language; It's strange to go off the deep on someone simply offering the linguistic equivalent of "Hey dude, your fly isn't zipped up."
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen21/09/22 06:08 PM
5

On a macro scale, or a micro scale? The only "solution" is the adoption of individually-beneficial strategies at the individual (i.e. micro) level, which is where things like TRP and MGTOW come in. Once enough people subscribe to -and practice- the tenets of movements like these, then you begin to see a macro-level shift in societal norms/behaviors/standards. This is not necessarily an endorsement of any of these. Rather, it's simply pointing out how they act and the effect they (can) have.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen13/09/22 07:27 PM
64

One thing to note, especially with the types of people who are acolytes of Duluth Model-esque worldviews, is that they will freely and gleefully spout the claim that "The majority of domestic violence is perpetrated by men." They invariably refuse to acknowledge that the majority of domestic damage is done by women, though. Who causes the most emotional strife in relationships? Who incessantly stirs of up drama and operates overwhelmingly on emotions/tingles? Who overwhelmingly cracks relationsh…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen27/08/22 03:52 PM
22

“Don’t single moms deserve to date, what if she cannot find childcare!?” The whole "deserve" schtick is a tacit attempt at shaming language via false framing. It seeks to establish the false premise of "worthiness" as being an immutable characteristic that's inherent to any person, simply by dint of that person's existence, and then preemptively using that premise (mere existence = "deserving" of [thing]) to dismiss anyone who disagrees. The definition of Deserve is to "have or show qualities wo…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen24/08/22 03:15 AM
27

I wonder if (given a decade or two) being a child who has both parents married and together (i.e. a father) will be a concrete status symbol of sorts. My youngest nephew and niece were in public school for their freshman year of high school this past year, and they hated it. From what they describe, something like 60%+ of their peers came from single-mother homes, and these peers of theirs were neurotic messes rife with behavioral, social, and emotional issues that they were on a myriad of medic…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen09/08/22 05:39 PM
10

A big reason for the way women are today is because of how men treat them. A big reason for the way women are today is because of how men treat them. Women are the sexual selectors. They are in complete control of the type(s) of men who they choose to associate with when it comes to relationships, unless you're arguing that they are slaves who possess no agency, autonomy, or authority. Women choose who they associate with. Women choose who they have relationships with. Women choose who they have…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen01/08/22 05:25 PM
20

BBW As presented: This is an oxymoron that could only exist for masochistic fetishists
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen23/07/22 03:12 AM
2

It's sad to say but I no longer take women's abuse-related claims at face value these days, especially without strong evidence. I require incontrovertible evidence as a baseline after multiple instances of coworkers and acquaintances (across decades of time, multiple industries, multiple social spheres, and multiple hobbies) having their lives ruined (or hazarded to the point of ruination) by unsubstantiated accusations.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen18/07/22 10:17 PM
20

They also view it as a "low-class" (and thus low-status) activity. For people who chase social status, and appropriate their partner's status as their own, they view the hobby with disgust.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen28/04/22 07:35 PM
8

Fuck off, you cherry pick shit out of context to support your stupid world view. And trying to have any sort of discourse (let alone barebones discussion) with these people is fucking unbearable. It's always whatever buzzword-laden flavor-of-the-month thing that they became an overnight expert on. Geopolitics? - They can't be wrong. Economics? They can't be bothered to do any outside reading/research, and their system "hasn't actually been tried, yet." Social policy? - Anyone who questions them …
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen24/04/22 05:21 AM
2

https://igotstandardsbro.com/ This is great. Let me run some numbers. Edit: As someone who's part of the 0.1%, according to the data, this is hilarious.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/04/22 08:08 PM
6

In the same way that calling people who follow the teachings of Christ "Christians," it at least makes sense on a surface level to call people who follow the teachings of Muhammad "Muhammadans." That being said, as someone who has no scholarly religious interest, any deeper meaning is beyond the scope of my knowledge.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/04/22 06:47 PM
29

They can't even handle constructive criticism, Nearly everything remotely close to constructive criticism is usually taken as a personal affront. Objective observation? - Obviously a slight against me! Measured statement of fact? - I'm being attacked! Robotic reiteration of policies/guidelines/regulations when they aren't being adhered to? - "Mansplaining!" Taking on extra duties/training and assisting other departments? - My authority is being undermined! Asking a question in a group meeting? -…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen06/04/22 07:56 PM
18

I've never been able to find the original comment(er) from TRP, but it's always stuck with me: "The only reason that women win arguments is that only idiots argue with women."
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen02/04/22 02:46 PM
23

Highly-successful people are frequently (functionally) uni-dimensional due to the extreme sacrifices that they have to make -in regards to neglecting other areas of their life- to achieve dominance in their specific domain of expertise.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen31/03/22 09:32 PM
9

Now imagine having to try and deal with that incoherent verbal diarrhea if you encountered Ms. G in real life.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen13/03/22 03:16 AM
5

As it turns out, anyone worth their salt does not care to invest in a depreciating asset that cannot be written off.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen12/03/22 04:04 PM
50

She's likely one of the 40% of female physicians who quit or go part-time after six years. Now that she's done the "tough stuff" of med school/residency/fellowship, and she has the pseudo-status of being a Ms. with an M.D., she's suddenly decided that working full-time just isn't her "thing." We've been seeing this more and more, lately, where a woman has heaven and earth moved for her with grants/scholarships/exceptions/quotas/etc. so she can "outcompete" an otherwise-more-suitable male medical…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen10/03/22 06:41 PM
3

Also the fact that she's in LA. International travel? Just drive the 100-ish miles to Tijuana and you're an instant "international traveler" who's been "out of the country."
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen17/02/22 10:55 PM
15

Interesting how black text on a white screen tends to do that.
/r/TheRedPill16/02/22 09:31 PM
11

I'd like to propose another option: 4) In medical school, with zero interest in (or time for) a relationship with someone like the inspin in the OP Either way, she's painted herself into a corner where she wants her desires and demands to coincide but is neither able or willing to manifest the things that it takes to get her there.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen16/02/22 09:29 PM
4

It's an interesting double-standard, which is really the only type of standard that these people have. Men should always seek only women their age, but women don't have to? Stay mad, inspins.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen28/01/22 07:27 PM
17

One of the things that puts them on the back foot is pointing out that it's -if anything- an earnings gap, not a compensation gap that's the direct result of women's choices. Women choose to work fewer hours than men. Women choose to take more vacation time than men. Women do not negotiate as aggressively as men. Women gravitate towards "soft" professions that pay less. Women work in their careers for shorter periods of time than men. Women take substantive amounts of time off of work for life c…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen03/01/22 10:12 AM
5

It's rather amusing that the same people who eagerly assert that niggling things like trauma and obesity are immutably propagated across multi-generation ancestry lines (i.e. through genetics, specifically epigenetics) simultaneously claim that there is no way that more-concrete characteristics like intelligence can ever be related to genetics.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/12/21 09:00 PM
7

It is not worth it. 2. Because the facts say it is not a good strategy. 3) Marriage offers nothing that cannot be easily and readily obtained without it
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen05/12/21 01:38 AM
10

“what the fuck do [men] want?” They ask this question, then get righteously offended and scream "muhsogyny!" as soon as the actual answer is proffered. To her: Men have been telling you, your whole life, exactly what they want. You're just incapable of understanding or accepting it.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen05/12/21 01:30 AM
10

Rule #4 specifically states (in part): "Do not look for the individuals posted here, nor ask or give their personal info/social media, nor ask or give the source subreddit or website..."
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen23/11/21 08:24 PM
1

That's a fair point. One of the reasons I am vehemently against people falsely alleging rape for much less serious instances of "thing that is sexual that I did not like" is that it waters down the severity of actual instances of rape, along with the fact that a friend was legitimately raped as a child, so trivializing rape serves only to delegitimize those who have actually been a victim of it. There's a lot of social nuance that of course plays into the general handling of the issue that isn't…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen19/11/21 07:30 PM
14

Exactly. People crying falsely crying "rape" does nothing but delegitimize actual victims of rape by trivializing them, their suffering, and the severity of what happened to them.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen17/11/21 10:47 PM
28

This is the exact tack I've taken to using. Oh, you were raped? That's terrible. How is the police investigation/report proceeding? They then invariably reveal that, well, you know, there was a [VAGUE CIRCUMSTANCE] and that's why no rape was reported and no report was filed. ...well you just let a "rapist" walk free, then, deary. You're actively perpetuating and tacitly promoting the "rape culture" you claim exists by allowing your rapist to remain a free man and presumably keep raping. They're …
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen17/11/21 08:07 PM
11

Exactly. Single motherhood is overwhelmingly the product of personal choices She chose to have sex with a man She chose to allow that man to have unprotected sex with her She chose to not be on active birth control (shot, implant, IUD and/or pill) while engaging in sex She chose to not use post-sex ("morning-after") birth control She chose to carry her child to term and not abort pre-birth (per whichever trimester is legal and safe) She chose to not adopt the child out post-birth As the sexual s…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen13/11/21 07:38 PM
5

Not all women are like that, but why risk it? "Not all women would, but any woman could." In the absence of being able to clearly tell the difference between someone who is able and willing to screw you over, and someone who is able but not willing, your best (and arguably only) option is outright avoidance.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen09/11/21 09:48 PM
8

I'm trying to come up with a neat and snappy quip to the "who hurt you?" line "Not everyone is (broken)/(a victim) like you. Stay on topic." If they refuse to engage with your frame of conversation and keep trying to drag things into the weeds then you just slip in a slight jab like "This is over until you can handle yourself in a conversation" and walk away. Use their own methods against them.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen06/11/21 05:21 AM
15

To quote an acquaintance: "Their past price floor [for sexual access] becomes my present price ceiling; She isn't worth any more than she's required of her past lowest-effort sexual partner."
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen06/11/21 05:14 AM
13

People of this sort use words as interchangeable* proxy tokens for the emotional effect that they have, not as actual words in the way that you or I think of them, which is that words are concrete language objects that have a definitive form and concrete conceptualization to accurately describe and communicate something. Words, to these people, are defined solely on the emotional effect that they have, not on their actual content or intent. This is why it's generally a fool's errand to argue wit…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen06/11/21 05:03 AM
13

If you're a woman. If you're a man, yeah that's got value. Agreed. I probably should have made it clearer that that valuation applies wholly to women. Your insight here is very good, and it's mirroring my experiences to a tee: One of the biggest issues in the dating market right now is that women are trying their utmost to be carbon copies of the men that they themselves want, without a single thought given to what they offer to those men (or, conversely, what their desired men actually want in …
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen03/11/21 05:20 PM
55

Golly gee, it sure is strange when the consequences of your choices and actions come home to roost, isn't it, women? To paraphrase an older comment: It's never been an issue that women monkey-branch from partner to partner while using and discarding men at the* drop of a hat, riding the CC as long as they are able as they blow through partners and chase their endorphin hit. When every single woman at the peak of her SMV and/or MMV uses men for attention/validation/free stuff and ghosts these peo…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen03/11/21 02:57 PM
10

I completely agree and support on these over30s forums for women to never 'settle'...for every woman that does never settle a guy is saved. Steelmanning their ridiculous positions is always a great to highlight their myopia and/or hypocrisy. Reframing each of their ideas in a light that is exclusively favorable/beneficial to men and then voicing support for it on those grounds causes head-exploding meltdowns.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen17/10/21 06:07 PM
8

Now her facebook posts are a combination of how strong she is, and how everything is so hard for her. It's always interesting to see how people of her ilk invariably start constructing a personal mythos of propaganda to deal with their cognitive dissonance. To explain (and quote a previous comment of mine): The "enemy" in wartime propaganda is Immensely powerful, evil, and cunning while simultaneously Weak, cowardly and easily defeated By the same token here, she likely is simultaneously making …
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen09/10/21 06:29 PM
14

Joins -and uses- an app for casual sex Complains for six minutes that people are using said hookup app for actually hooking up The mysterious vagaries of this mortal coil are indeed a great burden to bear.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen04/10/21 02:04 AM
17

Women can't help trying to make a man submissive to them to use. A woman's prime directive is emotional conquest/domination. This is one of the focal points from which sexual attraction originates (along with the cry of "WAATGM!?"), wherein "Alpha Fucks" are men with Sexual options Social potency A lack of attachment/submissiveness who are attractive precisely because they themselves are not (or have not been) able to be emotionally brought to heel (i.e. they possess greater "frame" as a proxy f…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen03/10/21 08:41 PM
5

Whoa there, sir. How dare you assert that pregnancy resulting from sex between consenting adults is the product of a long series of personal choices and that it didn't "just happen" like a gift from God Himself. Pointing out that women Choose to engage in sexual activity Control who they have sex with Are able to determine and dictate their sexual partner(s) usage of physical birth control Get to use readily-available birth control both before and after sex Choose to get or not get post-concepti…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen07/09/21 06:23 AM
1

the common female response would be denial “he must be out there”. Having just had basically this discussion with several people (male and female) during a dinner outing, that is verbatim what the females said. The conversation drifted into "I can't find a good man..." which then led to a clarification on what a "good" man really was. We managed to boil it down to a "good man" being someone who is just: 6'+ Physically fit and/or athletically active (not overweight or obese) Has a career and is m…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen31/08/21 08:40 PM
2

Will do. I'll work on expanding it and getting it more in line with WATGMA's Rule #3.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen23/08/21 02:35 PM
1

Edit: Although you seem to have linked wrong in the [B]eing affiliated" etc. part. Thank you for pointing that out, the link should be working properly now.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen23/08/21 02:33 PM
64

It's a reflexive post-rejection defense mechanism. "Andrew" in the OP was a man that the woman found attractive enough to not only get the contact info of, but also attractive enough for her to attempt to contact him. Women rarely take the initiative in this regard (since doing so risks rejection), so he must have been quite high-value in her eyes. When it was revealed that "Andrew" had given her false contact info, thus tacitly rejecting her, she lashed out. This occurs because women, when reje…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen21/08/21 07:35 PM
6

A worn-out person making worn-out jokes while wearing out their welcome in the dating market as they waste away what little time remains of their prime years. The whole scenario perfectly emblematizes everything wrong with OLD and the majority of people who use such services.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen15/08/21 04:06 AM
10

But that exact logic works both ways. There is a reason they are a better protector - because they are considered more physically dangerous The better a prospective protector, the better a prospective predator. This, however, is something that these people fail to see. They believe that because they are attracted to someone who would make a much more efficient and powerful predator/protector, their attraction itself renders that person less a predator and more a protector (because, of course, th…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen03/08/21 06:38 PM
11

You're proposing a hypothetical scenario about someone so vanishingly rare that the thing that truly would matter is all of the attendant contingencies that have created such a person (and their situation), not necessarily the person themselves.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen01/08/21 09:40 PM
20

"One’s number of lifetime partners is a strong predictor of (in)fidelity."
/r/MGTOW30/07/21 01:51 AM
22

"Discrimination" is a normal human function that involves the cogent and rational qualification, quantification, differentiation, and judgement of varying things to arrive at a sound decision. An innocuous example that everyone does (and has done): Presented with multiple types of foods to choose between for meal? - You discriminate between them and decide which one you will consume based on your judgement criteria. It's a word that's been co-opted by the language police to be loaded with negati…
/r/MGTOW23/07/21 06:09 PM
6

the guy in the picture on the left isn't lonely at all, he's enjoying some music with his headphones on while relaxing in his living room. If anything, it's a depiction of happiness rather than loneliness. The articles in the OP are either unable or unwilling to differentiate between "alone" and "lonely;" The two concepts aren't mutually inclusive.
/r/MGTOW18/07/21 05:05 PM
10

Apparently wanting limited government, freedom of speech, and decentralized power, makes one a "fascist."
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen12/07/21 06:56 AM
9

They actually mean equity. Good point. The world is being ruined by people who cannot tell the difference between equity and equality.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen04/07/21 01:23 AM
18

That kind of "bro move" frequently results in the aggrieved spouse taking their anger out on the reporting party.
/r/MGTOW03/07/21 11:27 PM
13

What about them? State your point clearly and concisely or don't bother with your concern trolling.
/r/MGTOW01/07/21 02:25 AM
5

"Some people go to the gym to look good. Other people look good to go to the gym. The first type of person is the only type of person who is ever going to be successful."
/r/MGTOW23/06/21 05:43 PM
34

The interesting thing about having high standards is that it implies the holder of said high standards has high value themselves There's a strange "Transitive Value Property" that women seem to have in relationships, hookups, and marriage. That is, whatever their partner's status happens to be, they assume that that status/value is conferred upon themselves simply because they are or have been in a relationship with that person. And, through having "achieved" that level of status or value, they …
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen20/06/21 08:39 PM
6

Classical liberals are staunch individualists who are proponents of personal rights, free speech, and limited government. What /u/variedpageants is describing falls squarely under the umbrella of Leftism, not liberalism. Leftists are unrepentant collectivists who espouse Marxist ideologies predicated on group identity and resultant social policy. The only "force" that they (Leftists) recognize as being valid is that of power in the form of authoritarian control.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen19/06/21 10:14 PM
31

Women have massive amounts of in-group bias, to a degree that is not shared or practiced by men. They select for "themselves," as it were.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/06/21 06:38 PM
18

I'm seeing more and more men expressing this sentiment, and I can't say I blame them. Too long have people been too accepting of sub-standard behavior. An acquaintance (who I had pegged as a limp-wristed blue-pilled type, though he is a quality guy) shared with me that after breaking up with his ex who cheated on him, he ran into a mutual friend who (allegedly) tried to guilt him into taking her back by telling him that his ex "felt like shit," to which he rejoined "Good. Let her drown in it." T…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen07/06/21 07:00 AM
6

You can't reason someone out of a position they didn't reason themselves in to. "The only reason that women win arguments is that only idiots argue with women" is a statement that applies to Leftists too. When it comes to Leftists, all that's left for you to do is mock them, apply pressure by pointing out their continuous personal/political failures, laugh at them, and dismiss them as the ignorant idiots that they are.
/r/MGTOW03/06/21 01:30 AM
25

This, I think, illustrates a key takeaway when it comes to trying to tangle with intelligent and knowledgeable people (who are also successful). In general, they're insanely obsessive, ridiculously hard working, and unbelievably detail-oriented along with having social/political connections to people of the same ilk. Couple that with a do-or-die competitive drive and pathological disagreeableness and there's literally no other option than to lose if you go against them. I've seen both outcomes: …
/r/MGTOW01/06/21 06:38 PM
4

They also reveal their deep-set lack of intelligence by stating drivel like this. No, the world is not "telling" you anything. The world is simply showing you the best people, and you are telling yourself that you aren't whatever they are. Don't like it? Improve yourself. Can't handle it? Too bad.
/r/MGTOW31/05/21 01:20 AM
16

Indeed. The single mothers seem to be generally regarded as being "more worthy" by dint of their single-motherhood plight, and thus they're at the head of the church sisterhood's/matron's matchmaking list for any unsuspecting and/or eligible bachelor who enters the fold.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen05/05/21 04:36 PM
4

To quote an old TRP comment: "The only reason that women win arguments is that only idiots argue with women."
/r/MGTOW04/05/21 05:58 AM
8

Well said. I've heard it stated as "You cannot reason someone out of a position they did not reason themselves into." Either way, the sentiment is the same, and it holds quite true.
/r/MGTOW04/05/21 05:55 AM
30

"My demands increase as my market value decreases. Why does nobody understand that I'm exempt from basic market forces?"
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen02/05/21 03:20 AM
1

If you are over 30 and never married... you sir, are a walking red flag. Nope. You desperately want the men who are in this category, who happen to have incredibly-high value. It just so happens that these men have zero interest in you. You already know this, though, or you wouldn't be frantically trying to pretend like you're in control with your transparent tactic of seeming pre-disqualification.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen14/04/21 02:51 AM
5

Here's her deleted post: My girlfriend and I have been talking for awhile about the abusive nature of my last relationship and how people like him shouldn't be allowed to get away with behaviour like his. I'll preface this by saying that my ex had serious anger control issues and was a class 1 grade A misogynistic piece of shit. After he abandoned the relationship and moved out of our house, he had me evicted (my name wasn't on the mortgage) even though we both resided there together. After we b…
/r/MGTOW28/03/21 06:05 PM
31

They complain about being "objectified" as "sex objects" while ignoring how they classify and objectify men as success objects.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen26/03/21 02:23 PM
315

"I have problems X, Y, and Z. I do not know what to do and do not have what I want." Well, it's simple. Things A, B, and C, are all the root causes of your problems. Either fix these root causes or modify your wishes. "You're a misogynist incel" ... No wonder this fat idiot is unsuccessful and unhappy.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen24/03/21 06:05 PM
14

I graduated with a good number of accountant women who immediately moved to expensive metro areas and started bragging about their "six figure" jobs on social media while posting the usual attention-seeking fare of expensive meals, high-rise views, generic weather, and $40 margaritas. It turns out that all of them somehow don't understand that cost-of-living-adjusted compensation packages aren't truly a six-figure income. Most of them are more than happy to round up to the nearest $100,000 (even…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen24/03/21 05:02 PM
2

They are narcissistic self-righteous moralists who view you as beneath them.
/r/MGTOW16/03/21 04:53 AM
10

My favorite is that women doing sex work are both brave and a boss bitch, but also a helpless victim who’s being used against her will. It's textbook propaganda. The "enemy" in wartime propaganda is Immensely powerful, evil, and cunning while simultaneously Weak, cowardly and easily defeated By the same token here, she is simultanesouly: A completely-empowered untouchable maverick while also being An infinitely-abused and perpetually-oppressed victim who is wholly hopeless and helpless
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen14/03/21 09:55 PM
1

She also doesn't realize that the other answer to her implicit question of "Can you measure up to this dude that I can hire?" is simply: Yes. I can. They are the ones who cannot measure up to me. The fact that you're asking this with them as your paragon of value means that you are not worth my time. Next. Both answers to her question, no matter the man, are immediate dismissals because her question is itself a personal disqualifier.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen14/03/21 04:57 AM
24

It's yet another example of these people's projection. In her mind, a man surrounded by (what she perceives to be) high-status or high-value people of the opposite gender asserts and affirms his value. So, in her mind, she herself doing that same behavior establishes and reinforces her perceived value. She doesn't realize that this sort of thing is a turn-off for men, not a turn-on like it is for women.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen13/03/21 08:53 PM
7

I've heard a variation that's got a nice rhyme: "If it floats, fucks, or flies: Always rent, never buy."
/r/MGTOW12/03/21 09:46 PM
14

Her lack of rationale is "an outrageous violation" of basic human function. Ergo, she is a rapist.
/r/MGTOW12/03/21 05:44 PM
8

FDS: "Parasites complaining about a lack of suitable hosts"
/r/MGTOW11/03/21 10:25 PM
2

And whose word did the father take at face value, with zero attempt at corroboration?
/r/MGTOW10/03/21 06:57 PM
126

Notice how she frames it as you "got lucky" and were just "given a good job," conveniently obviating and trivializing all your hard work, your merit, your intelligence/skill/education/connections, etc. In these people's minds, merit is just a fairy tale. Her entire worldview is predicated on making everyone share in her misery by forcing upon them her philosophy of failure and her gospel of envy. "You can't stand it when people aren't unhappy and unsuccessful like yourself."
/r/MGTOW10/03/21 06:55 PM
2

When there is no functional difference between "unwilling" and "unable" then all that matters is the end result.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen06/03/21 10:43 PM
69

"If you want a man, but no men want you, then that's your problem to fix and not theirs."
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen02/03/21 10:11 PM
3

Even better is the implicit conclusion to their inane statement. "I'm not gonna debate about this" Thank you for admitting that your positions are indefensible and incorrect.
/r/MGTOW28/02/21 05:55 PM
9

Most people think that education = intelligence yet that couldn't be further from the truth.
/r/MGTOW14/02/21 07:42 PM
5

Lawyers and Doctors were my first thought. I bet that people ask them for advice all of the time. Can confirm that this is the case. "I cannot freely offer you advice and cannot just 'help you really quick' regarding [your issue]. If you have a pressing need, here is my office's contact information so that you can schedule an appointment/consultation. These are my rates and this is my earliest availability." This is invariably met with responses ranging from some form of disappointment to enrage…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen09/02/21 08:15 PM
1

eating healthy is expensive An entire week's worth of healthy home-cooked meals can be had for under than $30, if not $20 or less. For breakfast have some eggs, some oats, some milk, and/or some fruit. For lunch/supper have some rice, some lentils, some beans, some meat (or tofu), and/or some sautéed vegetables. Throw in the occasional sandwich, snack, or treat for a dollar or so more in ingredients. Not only is it incredibly healthy, it's also incredibly cheap.
/r/MGTOW04/02/21 11:03 PM
2

What a shock that FDS vomits Feminist propaganda. These people believe that any relationship involving a "power" disparity is inherently predatory and fundamentally exploitative, not realizing that all successful relationships are predicated on a disparity in complementary value.
/r/MGTOW03/02/21 01:05 AM
3

Exactly.
/r/MGTOW02/02/21 03:57 AM
19

All righty, we can do objective numbers then. A male relative who: Is a Doctor (MD, not PhD) Is a hair under 6'4" Has done amateur and low-level professional modeling Was a collegiate athlete Speaks multiple languages Has a tested IQ of 130-something finds himself in the exact same boat as OP. I wouldn't say it's truly "overestimation" if similar scenarios are occurring for people in roughly the same value bracket.
/r/MGTOW02/02/21 12:27 AM
2

Pointing out how people who view one-time behavior as "harassment" do so due to the same personal issues that manifest themselves with their relationships.
/r/MGTOW01/02/21 03:01 AM
2

In the same way that many of these people are serial monogamists who continue into new relationships that only last a short time until the "honeymoon" phase crashes and burns (i.e. "serialized but separated", to the point that both "serialized" and "separated" are the same thing for them) they also view reality in the same sort of "separated but serialized" manner due to their conflation of the two. One person, doing one thing like this, is not "harassment." They, however, view many people doing…
/r/MGTOW31/01/21 09:30 PM
5

They select only for low-RMV/low-MMV but high-SMV men, and then complain that high-RMV/high-MMV men don't exist and/or aren't available. Newsflash: They do. They just aren't interested in (and aren't presenting themselves to) you.
/r/MGTOW31/01/21 09:07 PM
6

this sub also sees women as the only reason when relationships go wrong. Not at all. This sub specifically exists to point out, discuss, and ridicule all of the relationships that end (or are prevented from ever starting at all) as a result of women and their actions, in addition to "exposing all the women who complain about wanting a "good man" after dating jerks and riding the cock carousel in the prime of their youth, and think they're deserving of commitment and financial stability when all …
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen27/01/21 03:55 PM
34

Don't legitimize their degenerate debasement with soft language. If they transact any sort of sexual service for money, they are whores who are practicing prostitution. "Sex work" is a feel-good rebranding attempt that should not be legitimized under any circumstances.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen23/01/21 05:52 PM
5

dysgenics What an excellent word to describe these people. Thank you for it.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/01/21 08:32 PM
1

Your conclusions rely on the presupposition of a man who is functionally invisible due to a lack of attractiveness/value/noteworthiness, which is not the case. Men are the gatekeepers of commitment, and women are the gatekeepers of sex. Feel free to leverage this objective facet of reality as you will.
/r/MGTOW08/01/21 07:02 PM
1

If one is "buying" (in this analogy) a committed lifelong partner, with the currency you are offering being commitment, then yes, you absolutely are the buyer. This means you are setting the value of the goods/services you are "buying" relative to the commitment that you are offering, and commensurately setting the quality/quantity/value of goods/services that are equivalent to what you offer. Your statement belies a fundamental misunderstanding of relationship dynamics. You are unequivocally th…
/r/MGTOW08/01/21 06:40 PM
3

And in a competitive market, the buyer determines the value of a good/service, not the seller. The fact that these people are fundamentally incapable of understanding basic principles of transaction dooms them to failure from the outset, and does nothing but demonstrate their own lack of value.
/r/MGTOW08/01/21 06:06 AM
6

"Middle-aged woman" "Sexy woman" Pick one.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen05/01/21 09:55 PM
19

thinning out your competition This is some juicy wordplay. Well done.
/r/MGTOW04/01/21 07:01 PM
53

That a man loves and is so infatuated with me to the point that he is willing to put my comfort above all else; That is what I desire And what are you doing/offering to make it so that someone would happily reciprocate in such a manner? "I want all of the benefits of traditional roles with none of the responsibilities/duties of traditional roles" is this inspin's cry.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen04/01/21 03:35 AM
20

They constantly conflate "intimidating" with "insufferable."
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen02/01/21 09:12 PM
10

Also, from what I have seen, the most "successful" marriages (happiness of either party not taken into account) are ones that that not only include the "married in the first six years of adulthood" element for the female, but also have the male figure either in his thirties or forties at the time of marriage.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen02/01/21 09:09 PM
4

That's entirely too reasonable. I'm going to have to find some way to shame you on social media so that you see the error of your successful ways.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen02/01/21 06:38 PM
19

"Abuse" is just shorthand for "something that I do not like" with these people.
/r/MGTOW28/12/20 03:11 AM
41

By all means, continue to work yourself into an emotionally-exhausted and internally-unfulfilled mess, desperate for some peace, some quiet, a loving spouse, and a loving family that you can relax into. Your job isn't going to care for you in your old age. A random feel-good job title isn't going to fulfill you. Your catty attitude and abrasive speech aren't going to accrete others to you. Having multiple jobs isn't going to prevent you from aging out of the visibility of people you find attract…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen26/12/20 08:19 PM
122

A lot of women are discovering just how valuable their random quasi-managerial quota-hire fluff positions truly are as businesses are having to tighten their finances. Spoiler: They're not valuable at all. Turns out the company doesn't need things like an "Administrative Morale Assistant" to function.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen26/12/20 08:11 PM
5

And, amusingly, the pool of attractive women is commensurately decreased. Feminists do their damnedest to decrease "equality" by commensurately decreasing/removing equity, then are shocked that more inequality is the result. An example of this is the fact that as societies become more egalitarian, career choices by gender become less egalitarian. Feminists (and all others of their ilk) are fundamentally unable to tell the difference between equity and equality. The "problem" of "value" gaps incr…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen24/12/20 08:26 PM
18

Straight from the horse's mouth; For women: "A mountain of wealth [is] what love is all about"
/r/MGTOW24/12/20 04:20 AM
7

It's very telling that only after the "relationship" has effectively ended that she is now even contemplating finally communicating what she should have asked months ago: "Something seems wrong. Are you OK?" None of this trite "I'll just not communicate with him to try and force his hand" or the vague beating-around-the-bush "Can I come over (to spy on you)?" meaninglessness, or -again- the even more pernicious "I'll just cut off all communication for a month with my partner because they seem di…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen19/12/20 08:33 AM
5

Also she's too ignorant/idiotic to spell "hippie," so she's mentally deficient as well as hygienically deficient
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen19/12/20 08:12 AM
14

Obviating and ignoring shit tests is -amusingly- the best way to "pass" them.
/r/MGTOW17/12/20 05:34 PM
5

That's...not how any of this works. Saying that someone has "Daddy issues" is shorthand for saying that they have deep-set problems with authority, responsibility, and their emotional needs/behaviors relating to both of the prior. It has literally nothing to do with that person's father and seriously everything to do with that person's personal issues.
/r/MGTOW17/12/20 12:59 AM
2

Finding casual sexual partners has never been easier.
/r/MGTOW14/12/20 11:56 PM
12

"Everyone dies alone. Whether you are a king on a battlefield or a lowly peasant lying in bed among your family, no one can accompany you into the void.”
/r/MGTOW14/12/20 11:53 PM
11

You've reminded me of an older post of a Twitter screenshot here that I can't seem to find, but I'll paraphrase: "There is an ever-growing group of socially-disaffected military-age males who are being told at every turn that they are worthless, hopeless, and fundamentally evil to the point that they have no place in society due to their gender. You are in extreme danger."
/r/MGTOW11/12/20 07:55 PM
3

What a shock that your entire comment is nothing but shallow attempts at character attacks instead of anything substantive. Bye.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/12/20 08:24 PM
3

All of your assertions and conclusions would require a reality in which women are wholly devoid of individual agency, autonomy, and authority as a direct function of their gender, which is objectively incorrect. By pointing to a nebulous "patriarchy" as an omnipotent and omnipresent social bogeyman that you perceive to be the cause for all imagined social ills, you rob each woman of all personal agency to the point that each one -in your twisted world- by sole dint of their gender is rendered an…
/r/PussyPassDenied08/12/20 08:04 PM
6

The patriarchy is real You gender conspiracy theorists are a funny lot
/r/PussyPassDenied08/12/20 07:45 PM
2

That fluting on the barrel is amazing. I've always enjoyed* spiral fluting like LWRCI's. Any details you could provide on who did it if it's custom, or if it's a factory option?
/r/MGTOW30/11/20 06:46 PM
1

Ah, that makes sense. I see what you're driving at.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen20/11/20 08:58 PM
5

5% bodyfat is possible without being ripped. Definitely not. At 3-5% body fat you're in the hospital, and below that you're outright dead. This is a DEXA-verified 6%.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen20/11/20 07:52 PM
11

That's how she perceives high-value men (i.e. they are more valuable to her the more partners they have), but doesn't realize that she is less valuable for doing the same. Projection at its finest.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen17/11/20 12:20 AM
2

That's a fair point. All the best!
/r/MGTOW16/11/20 11:41 PM
2

How would you define a Chad? Many people fit the physical, mental, and professional stereotypes, but don't manifest any of the social or sexual stereotypes.
/r/MGTOW16/11/20 11:29 PM
9

If the "toll" of medical professionals doing their job is too much for them then they're in the wrong profession to start with and it's a good thing that they're removing themselves from the profession; The last thing that's needed right now is a mass of human dead weight that's overly-concerned with feelings. The issue for the overwhelming majority of medical professionals right now is actually finding work due either Blue states trying to shut everything down and scaling patient contact hours …
/r/MGTOW16/11/20 11:26 PM
4

I'm only investing my time and money into my own blood - not somebody else's children. Well said.
/r/MGTOW16/11/20 05:53 PM
3

To single mothers: Not my progeny, not my problem. If you wanted a father figure for your children then you needed to make sure that you selected for quality men. The fact that you were either unable or unwilling to do so just reveals that your selection criteria, like you, are fundamentally broken and that you are lacking in the qualities, values, abilities, and proclivities that a high value man requires. Enjoy living with the consequences of your actions.
/r/MGTOW16/11/20 05:52 PM
4

I've received three back-to-back three-day "suspensions" for upvoting and/or commenting here in the past 10 days. They're attempting to train you and control you via operant conditioning.
/r/MGTOW16/11/20 05:36 PM
20

I'd argue that trade school would be the only option for someone looking to succeed in life at this point. It gives you everything that a degree does not (specifically a clearly-defined role with the skills, knowledge, and certification that are tailored to that role) which allows you to functionally "specialize" in a career due to you having immediate market exclusivity that you can readily capitalize on. I'd include doctors and lawyers under that "trade" umbrella since they have the same skill…
/r/MGTOW13/11/20 06:26 AM
23

Which will further devalue a degree as they trend towards lowest-common-denominator students, and result in further job market saturation and wage stagnation.
/r/MGTOW13/11/20 05:50 AM
10

100%. Title IX is an omnipresent Sword of Damocles that can and will be weaponized against you to destroy you and your future at the slightest provocation.
/r/MGTOW12/11/20 07:25 PM
25

My account just unlocked after a three-day suspension for upvoting here.
/r/MGTOW09/11/20 05:10 AM
1

Hypothyroidism adds, at most, 10 to 15 pounds.
/r/MGTOW04/11/20 04:46 AM
12

"Masculine republics give way to feminine democracies, and feminine democracies give way to tyranny." - Aristotle
/r/MGTOW31/10/20 06:20 PM
3

How dare we!
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen30/10/20 09:27 PM
9

Like most things that it infects with its insipidity, Feminism is incapable of originality or critical and independent rationale.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen30/10/20 08:25 PM
72

Funnily enough, if they all looked like hot models (along with acting with class/grace/dignity/support/subservience to a top-tier man) then they wouldn't have to sequester themselves to communities like FDS, since they would already have what they wanted. By that logic the mere fact that they are on FDS tells you exactly what kind of people they are: Ugly Fat Shrewish Bitter Cruel Vindictive Entitled Manipulative Low-class If they weren't, they wouldn't be on FDS.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen30/10/20 04:07 PM
1

...strangers lavish me with expensive gifts and bosses use me as eye candy. No. No they do not.
/r/MGTOW29/10/20 06:04 PM
2

"If you're not interested in the relationship then you have no place in my life."
/r/MGTOW28/10/20 04:57 PM
6

Consistent exercise (3+ or 4+ days per week) Healthy diet that is high in fiber, vegetables, and fruits, and minimizes carbohydrates and/or processed foods Drink only water, tea, and coffee; No alcohol, no soda, no sugary drinks Consistent bed time, one or two hours before midnight, and 7.5+ hours of sleep per night Minimize recreational screen time to an hour or so per day, and avoid blue light (such as those emitted by screens) three hours before bed so that melatonin production is not inhibit…
/r/MGTOW27/10/20 08:03 PM
3

"I prefer to keep my private life exactly that: private."
/r/MGTOW25/10/20 05:32 AM
18

And in being forced to do so, they are also forced to come to direct terms with the fact that the value they are able to provide is far short of the value they believe themselves to hold.
/r/MGTOW24/10/20 11:37 PM
3

"You aren't hot enough to be this annoying"
/r/MGTOW22/10/20 03:53 AM
6

The only reason that women win arguments is that only idiots argue with women.
/r/MGTOW21/10/20 11:26 PM
5

Functionally yes. It's a huge problem in the medical field right now, where something like 40% of female doctors either quit or go part-time after 6 years, and where there's an ever-growing shortage of doctors The issue is that there are a strictly-limited number of doctors minted every year. Let's use a nice round 50% for comparison, and let's say that that figure is evenly split on Quitting vs. Part Time. After 6 years: Female Doctor 1 - Quits (0% relative productivity) Female Doctor 2 - Goes …
/r/MGTOW21/10/20 09:47 PM
1

Anyone can be wealthy if they win the lottery.
/r/MGTOW21/10/20 09:29 PM
1

It's always funny to see "Orange Man Bad" posts made by TDS-afflicted people
/r/MGTOW21/10/20 04:02 PM
28

That's where you're wrong, kiddo.
/r/MGTOW21/10/20 03:57 PM
17

The absolute entitlement of the idiotic children in comment thread is staggering. It's not "abuse." It's not "cruel." It's not "manipulative." She demanded that she be treated like an "independent grown-ass woman." She was treated as such after using him for a lavish wedding (plus happily taking her lifetime of free education and worry-free living on his dime), and after she made a point of both disrespecting him and hurting his feelings. You don't get to have your dad pay for everything and pre…
/r/MGTOW21/10/20 03:37 PM
3

A large portion of the population doesn't understand that education =/= intelligence
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen19/10/20 04:36 AM
2

The term Latinx makes me unreasonably angry. It's the entire entitled worldview of these narcissistic children manifested in a single word: They firmly believe that the whole of reality (history, politics, society, laws, norms, etc.) should change completely just because they don't like it. To hell with the fact that nouns are broken up into different classes in Romance languages, and that this is a linguistic norm from time immemorial. To hell with the fact that societies, nations, and cultures…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen18/10/20 08:00 PM
6

You don't get to dictate terms. One of the strangest things about these people is that they lack a fundamental understanding of basic economics, business precepts, and even -at the most fundamental level- transactional exchange itself. Know who determines an item's market value in a free-market economy, which the sexual marketplace is? The buyers of that item. Know who does not get to arbitrarily set an item's market value in a free-market economy if they want to make a sale? The seller of that …
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen18/10/20 07:50 PM
2

The barebones checklist for marriage viability is incredibly simple and straightforward: Be a debt-free, tattoo-free virgin And yet that's apparently an impossible set of criteria for these people to meet, let alone the expanded, lengthy, and specific criteria that a top-tier man has.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen18/10/20 06:57 PM
1

What she's actually saying is that the men she likes do only these things. Every other man is invisible to her. What she is actually telling you is that she is a boring, shallow person who is only interested in other boring, shallow people, and that she doesn't know anyone not like this.
/r/MGTOW12/10/20 10:22 PM
3

Violation of hospital/group policy Violation of position standards Using hospital grounds/property for conducting personal business, especially personal business that is morally/ethically/legally wrong (in this case creation of pornographic content, akin to selling drugs on hospital grounds) Conduct unbecoming of a healthcare professional Misuse of personal time Use of a personal recording device to involve a patient in any/all of the former, which constitutes multiple HIPAA violation She's free…
/r/MGTOW12/10/20 04:29 PM
15

I can anecdotally confirm that this behavior is the de facto norm in most domains of business
/r/MGTOW04/10/20 03:55 AM
1

I could not care less about your personal problems and inability to understand conversational shorthand. Good bye.
/r/MGTOW03/10/20 03:25 PM
13

I can attest to this very thing. There are some very skilled, very experienced, and very indispensable people who companies do not need to have doing work all the time, but who those companies need to have on call functionally all the time in case they are needed immediately.
/r/MGTOW03/10/20 03:24 PM
5

You're being intentionally obtuse. "Socialism" in this context is a clear colloquialism for "collectivist thought/behavior." The fact that you're either unable or unwilling to understand this only tells people that you're really not worth their time.
/r/MGTOW03/10/20 03:12 PM
8

Women's prime directive is emotional conquest.
/r/MGTOW02/10/20 08:37 PM
7

It's amusing that she can't even post a few sentences without resorting to shaming language and insults. If she's so insufferable in just a few words, then imagine how terrible it would be to actually spend time with her. I've been in the shoes of the men she claims "run away" after conveniently revealing -months down the line- that she actually has children. It's not "running," it's actually: "I don't like being tacitly lied to about yourself or your life. If you can't be honest and upfront wit…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen30/09/20 07:49 PM
3

Your random assertion has nothing to do with the topic at hand. The supply continues to increase by the day and is, in fact, functionally unlimited as a result.
/r/MGTOW29/09/20 07:03 AM
6

Correct. So is yours. The sky is also blue, and the sun is shining somewhere in the world. None of these things have anything to do with the topic of discussion. Either make your point clearly and concisely or don't bother responding.
/r/MGTOW29/09/20 01:30 AM
26

you'll end up leaving all of them You're implying that the supply is finite and decreasing, while the opposite is actually the case
/r/MGTOW28/09/20 05:06 PM
1

A woman's prime directive is emotional conquest. They are turned on by the prospect of trying to conquer (i.e. "fix") a "bad boy", which amounts to emotional domination of that person to the point that they become domesticated and controllable.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen26/09/20 10:51 PM
7

It's a long laundry list of ad hominem shaming attempts that amount to nothing as long as you induce cognitive dissonance on their end: "You're an incellll" I'm in a long-term relationship with someone whose high libido matches mine "You're a misogynist" ...I hate the person who is in a relationship with me? "You're a sexist" Pointing out how you are wrong is not the same as defending those you claim to hate, and does not make me one of them. You don't get to Kafkatrap. "You have a small dick" Y…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen26/09/20 07:26 PM
15

complaining about "dog whistles" only they can hear This is something that these people always seem to miss, and that's so enjoyable to call them out on: If something is a "dog whistle" (for "racism" or "sexism" or whatever), and you are the one who heard it, then what does that make you?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen26/09/20 06:17 PM
24

If she was genuinely a "catch," then many people would be "wanting" her. The fact that they are not proves that she is not.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen22/09/20 05:01 PM
1

Who is John Galt?
/r/MGTOW11/09/20 02:40 AM
3

Notice how she immediately devolves into character attacks, shaming attempts, innuendo, and further attempts at group-exclusion behavior? These are women's fundamental attack and defense mechanisms. A woman's prime directive is emotional conquest. This is why you do not argue with women. They will attempt to: Destroy your reputation Smear and besmirch your character and values Induce negative emotions so that they can dominate your psyche Alienate you from whatever group(s) you are in The only r…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen05/09/20 09:45 PM
7

Your only real risk is your time. And your reputation. And your financial investment. And your personal finances, to the point of bankruptcy. And your opportunity costs. And all exposure to environmental, political, social, and economic risk. And all legal liability you incur. This is all 'Entrepreneurship 101' material, so I wonder why you're deliberately sidestepping it.
/r/MGTOW05/09/20 07:15 PM
6

The American "right" though, has an overall tendency to be racist. Absolutely not. Here is what the Left explicitly states about every aspect of modern Western culture: Nuclear family - "Whiteness" Hard work - "Whiteness" Justice - "Whiteness" Competition - "Whiteness" Personal achievement and success - "Whiteness" Time management - "Whiteness" Religion - "Whiteness" Then, after deeming everything to be "White," they deem all "White" people to be "subhuman" and march in the streets chanting "Dea…
/r/MGTOW05/09/20 05:27 PM
13

If you're unable to understand the amount of personal risk/effort that an upper-echelon business leader both manages and incurs, then there's really no point to you being involved in this discussion. Try it for yourself. Start a business, grow it into a corporation, and maintain C-level executive status all the way through. Tell us how "easy" it is and how there's no "risk" involved. It's just so simple to do and there are no downsides, right? You aren't going to, though, because it's hard, grue…
/r/MGTOW05/09/20 03:26 PM
1

As it turns out, people who make a career out of being obsessively analytical are also good at identifying, diagnosing, and mitigating potential risks like total career implosion.
/r/MGTOW04/09/20 08:58 PM
1

Just call them an "Administrative Assistant" and you're all good
/r/MGTOW04/09/20 08:51 PM
2

What a great interview. Thank you for posting it.
/r/MGTOW04/09/20 08:38 PM
1

For you, maybe.
/r/MGTOW02/09/20 02:45 AM
1

If you can't tell the difference between one's own pride in their achievements and "worship" then there's really no point to engaging with you. Here's what OP's post IS: Pride (noun) - a feeling or deep pleasure or satisfaction derived from one's own achievements Here's what OP's post is NOT: Worship (noun) - the feeling or expression of reverence and adoration for a deity Worship (verb) - show reverence and adoration for (a deity); honor with religious rites The definitions are clear. The only …
/r/MGTOW31/08/20 07:02 PM
1

I've never understood categorizing the pride of achievement/ownership as "worship" except as a personal outpouring of envy/insecurity. Would you call a proud home owner a "house worshiper?" Would you can a proud father a "child worshiper?" Would you call a doctor a "degree worshiper?" It seems to be no more than a deliberate combination of Oversimplification & Shaming language just to belittle and denigrate someone who has achieved something that they are proud of.
/r/MGTOW30/08/20 05:37 PM
2

Knowing your own blood type is ridiculously common. I've known mine since I was a child. Hell, I've known most of my immediate family's since around the same age. It was a cool and useful factoid that I wanted to know and never forgot.
/r/MGTOW30/08/20 05:27 PM
2

She is genuinely so boring and devoid of substance that I stopped watching after about a minute. You didn't miss out on anything.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen30/08/20 03:52 AM
1

Bilingualism is something that only 20-odd percent of the American population evidences: https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/life-bilingual/201809/the-amazing-rise-bilingualism-in-the-united-states
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen24/08/20 05:01 AM
14

You could almost make the same or similar character judgments about men... many, if not most of us, are low-life, slavering dogs. You say "us" as if you speak for men; You don't. Secondly, you don't get to call "most men" "low-life, slavering dogs." It's not only objectively incorrect, but borderline white-knighting and an all-but-outright Rule 1 violation. You're welcome to be a spokesperson for yourself, but you are not the arbiter of men or masculinity. There are amazing women out there, the …
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen24/08/20 02:38 AM
8

Well said. I think that a large number of savvy men who have come into their prime after years of rejection and poor treatment are deciding that fair turnabout is, in fact, warranted. These women believe themselves to be an asset appreciating in value while not realizing that on the balance sheet of a man's life they're actually both a depreciating asset and an outright liability. "You had your chance, but I'm no longer interested; I'm an investor, and you're a depreciating asset, which that mea…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen13/08/20 07:34 PM
6

hagiography What a beautiful word. Thank you.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen09/08/20 09:45 PM
2

This is a great tagline for someone who has an FFL and is also a research chemist.
/r/MGTOW09/08/20 08:11 PM
45

I’m starting to get a bit of a stand-offish vibe from guys, like they’re afraid to make a move, and I think it’s because they think that we don’t need them anymore. Women are verbatim telling men that they're not needed anymore: http://archive.is/P2xRq To quote: "THERE JUST AREN’T...WORTHWHILE GUYS" "WOMEN ARE THE COMPLETE PACKAGE ON THEIR OWN." "MEN HAVE LOST WHAT LITTLE VALUE THEY HAD." "WOMEN HAVE ESSENTIALLY BECOME THE MEN THEY WANTED TO MARRY." Men don't think they're not needed. Men are li…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen09/08/20 05:50 PM
65

All of these trite self-congratulatory platitudes aren't going to stave off your cripplingly depressing lack of fulfillment when you're single in your 30s and getting less and less attention from the men you desperately want (and want to be), women.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen09/08/20 05:43 PM
14

A college education/degree used to be the exclusive domain of the intellectual 1%, which is why it had so much value and buying power. Now, like you say, it's been reduced to High School 2.0 where any moron with a pulse can just put in the work and get a degree. Doctorate degrees are really the last domain of the intellectual elite in academia. It's fucking shameful.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/08/20 05:19 PM
3

Yes, that is exactly my point: There are a limited number of doctors that can be minted every year. If institutions prioritize female candidates (who functionally quit or drop out after just six years) due to affirmative action/diversity quotas, then they are directly causing and exacerbating the shortage.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/08/20 04:08 PM
99

Can confirm, have graduated from these learned institutions that pander to the lowest common denominator.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/08/20 04:46 AM
16

40% of female physicians either completely leave the profession or go part-time after 6 years. This is currently causing a minor crisis in the American medical field, which already isn't producing enough doctors. American has a growing lack of doctors. Rounded up to 50%: Six years down the road, every two female doctors are the rough equivalent in medical productivity/labor to one male doctor Selfishly taking the position of a prospective male life-time professional just so you can arrogantly le…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/08/20 12:14 AM
10

I have heard people unironically state that 40k is "sexist" because it involves "flawed female characters."
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen07/08/20 06:46 PM
29

Women effectively educate themselves out of the relationship marketplace. They functionally only date/marry/fuck across and up in value, but every man who hasn't earned as much as them or gotten the same pointless degrees that they have is "beneath them" and "not worth their time." They end up trying to become the person they want, not realizing that the people that they want absolutely do not care about a flimsy facsimile of themselves.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen07/08/20 04:29 AM
84

she endlessly claims her old and post wall friends and her all desperately want real men This one irks me the most. Let me describe a close male relative for you: 6'4" Medical doctor Did some modeling work Reads/writes/speaks two languages fluently Doesn't smoke, doesn't drink, doesn't do drugs, solid Christian background focused around family values And do you know what the dating market is like for him? There is nobody out there who is worth it. The entire dating scene is comprised of women li…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen07/08/20 04:18 AM
10

20+ Red Flags on this person Married Red flag "Poly" Red flag Has children Red flag "Mombod" Red flag Graduate student Red flag Heavily tattooed Tattooing yourself is a huge red flag, but choosing to vandalize your body and hands + neck/face plus trying to compensate for your lack of class with a tattoo of Shakespeare's Sonnet 31 is a Red Giant solar-body-sized red flag Vivid hair Red flag. Your aposematism is on full display. Anxious Red flag due to Cluster B personality disorders, which are an…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen04/08/20 08:44 PM
7

What does a valuable/successful man have in his 30s? A good income Intelligence and Experience A good social circle A good spread of hobbies/interests that he's well-versed in and pursuing Physical & Mental fitness His own home An active and interesting life involving his hobbies He's well-read, well-educated (or successful in such a manner that he has gained all the trappings of education without it being necessary), physically and mentally fit, pursuing his own goals, has surrounded himself wi…
/r/MGTOW04/08/20 03:28 AM
25

SMV = Sexual Market Value RMV = Relationship Market Value MMV = Marriage Market Value
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen02/08/20 09:35 PM
143

I abhor infidelity, but I've heard it said by those who pursue the homewrecker lifestyle that "If you're pursuing a woman who's single, you're competing with every other male on the planet. If you're trying to fuck a woman who's in a relationship, you only have to be a little bit better than one other person" It's sort of a nascent Alpha Widow Lite scenario.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen02/08/20 07:39 PM
106

This entire question factors into the success dichotomy in the sexual marketplace that many people seem either unable or unwilling to understand. These people seem to perpetually lack self-awareness to the point that I doubt they are actually able to function in society to any significant degree apart from being a corporate drone doing busy work, and even then only under strict supervision. Women want what they can't have, and take for granted that which they can already get. The person in the O…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen02/08/20 06:45 PM
6

Ye olde Horseshoe Theory
/r/MGTOW31/07/20 08:43 PM
7

I went to a school that is ranked as being in the top 25 when it comes to their Nursing program. I tutored a number of the students. The people in the program were outright idiots who struggled with basic concepts like memorization and who outright avoided and hated the hard sciences. The major is an outright farce. The people who pursue it are largely path-of-least-resistance participation trophy types.
/r/MGTOW31/07/20 08:42 PM
4

Absolutely.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen31/07/20 06:46 PM
5

The existence of Freedom -as a concept- also requires someone to admit to the concept of individualism (and the commensurate existence of individual agency and individual responsibility) as being both extant and valid. Further that, Freedom/Individualism can only result in meritocracy and a hierarchy of meritocratic value/success (e.g. Capitalism, as a system), along with the ownership of (and existence of) property + property rights. This is anathemic to Leftists, who are either unable or unwil…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen31/07/20 06:45 PM
13

Funny how these people don't seem to realize that if they are the ones hearing a "dog whistle" then that mean's they are the ones being signaled. If you "hear" a "racist dog whistle," that means that you are the racist. By claiming that something is a "racist dog whistle" that they can perceive, they reveal themselves to be a racist.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen31/07/20 06:20 PM
10

They've demanded and preached equality. According to every possible shred of their dogma, they are the equal of (if not superior to) every male. Equality? You get to stand up for yourself and handle your own problems. Don't like it? Can't handle it? Either recant your "muh equality" bullshit or accept the consequences of the reality you've made for yourself. Either way, it's their problem, not any man's problem.
/r/MGTOW29/07/20 05:03 PM
3

Unwilling =/= Unable "Not interested in" =/= "Can't handle"
/r/MGTOW29/07/20 05:01 PM
2

1) "If the wage gap actually existed then businesses would hire nothing but women. Your conspiracy theory holds no weight." 2) "If you know of any company selectively paying employees less/more based purely on their gender, then you need to report them to the proper authorities since that is explicitly illegal as per the Equal Pay Act of 1973, and innumerable legislation enacted since. Which ones are explicitly doing this, and what explicit proof do you have." 3) "A pay gap does not equal an ear…
/r/MGTOW29/07/20 01:08 AM
4

Indeed, metal shows, particularly the romantic quiet-hour metal shows that offer a fine-dining experience with some soft classical music in the background where people can hold truly meaningful discussions.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen28/07/20 08:31 PM
8

One of the last concerts I went to involved a random goth chick literally forcing her way through the crowd, standing by my side, and forcibly trying to hold my hand. Simply no, please don't, I'm here to move to the music. I'm not interested in trying to find a hand-holding partner let alone a life partner at a show. It's no surprise that someone so socially inept as the woman in the OP commensurately suffers the consequences of her social ineptitude.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen28/07/20 08:29 PM
11

33f "at nausea" [sic] Nobody who measures up to my standards is interested in me I'm not attractive, I have money and a job, am allegedly stable, claim to be "happy" despite bitching on the internet, and "take great care of myself" You're a past-your-prime pile of damaged goods who can't even be fucked to know basic Latin phrases like ad nauseum let alone understand why you do not get to have demands: You yourself do not meet your own standards, clearly, else these mythical men who meet and exce…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen28/07/20 07:59 PM
6

While anecdotal, it's not an unheard-of possibility that someone in their early-to-mid teens has accumulated a double-digit number of sexual partners. A Pediatrician relative has (and has had, throughout the years) multiple patients (male and female) who have already had 20+ unique sexual partners before their Freshman year of high school.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen27/07/20 05:42 PM
34

I fail to see how any part of that scenario counts as a "loss" for your hypothetical man: He has successfully filtered out a person who failed to qualify themselves to him and meet his standards He avoided being burdened by a likely-limitless resource drain His frame remains uncompromised He has not only demonstrated, but also established, his higher value All of these are incredible personal boons that allow a man to continue pursuing his higher purpose without compromising himself. That's "win…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen25/07/20 07:57 PM
14

The Dunning-Kruger effect is on full display with these types; They are too dumb to tell the difference between 'educated' and intelligent', and incessantly believe that they are mutually inclusive.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen25/07/20 05:00 PM
0

That's for you to decide.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen24/07/20 09:55 PM
1

You see this one a lot with Leftists; They incessantly conflate "Equity" and "Equality."
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen24/07/20 04:58 PM
1

"I'm glad that women can now go to war and die too"
/r/MGTOW23/07/20 08:52 PM
3

This girl (beautiful one) comes in a 35 dollar kmart dress and absolutely wipes the floor with her. As it turns out, shockingly, attractive people look attractive regardless of what they wear.
/r/TheRedPill23/07/20 12:33 AM
3

The men who this whore wants (high-value men who have success and standards) are not the men answering her questions on the internet.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen19/07/20 03:54 AM
8

You are one of those people who is either unable or unwilling to differentiate between correlation and causation. Stating that something will occur has absolutely nothing to do with causing that thing to occur.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen17/07/20 04:30 PM
4

What is "it" and why should he "get" "it?"
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen17/07/20 04:28 PM
28

I was actually banned from a sub that shall not be named for simply stating the StoneToss isn't a "Nazi," so thank you for setting the matter straight from the outset.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen17/07/20 04:27 PM
3

It’s the Tinder equivalent of “You can’t fire me, I quit!”
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen16/07/20 03:22 PM
11

This is the logical conclusion of women seeking to become men, and it's a downright delicious dose of schadenfreude. Feminism has always been an ideology that seeks to embitter women against men because they are not men while also demanding that women be as much like men as possible, as a direct result of they themselves viewing reality almost exclusively through the lens of gender conflict (in the same manner that Marxists view reality as total class warfare). While some found it hard to make f…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen14/07/20 08:33 PM
2

A woman’s primary directive is emotional conquest/domination. A woman’s sexual fantasy is to tame a beast, to conquer a dangerous man, to dominate a monster. As soon as she accomplishes this, though, she will immediately lose attraction. This is because everything is a test of a man's frame. By blowing through her inane frame checks and outright ignoring them or immediately moving on, you're reaffirming her mental fantasy that you're a powerful and dangerous person who has options and that she h…
/r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre13/07/20 06:09 PM
37

This is literally picture-perfect scripting on his part, too, and she doesn't even realize that she's been totally taken in by it. As per /u/shrinkshooter's excellent comment on the matter (paraphrased and quoted): Nothing makes a woman feel worse, more guilty, more horrendous, and more regretful than a guy leaving immediately. If a guy and a girl fuck, and the guy abandons her the instant it's over, "it's one of the most emotionally damaging things a guy can do to a chick." It's an emotional nu…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen13/07/20 05:31 PM
5

My sister recommended I go to therapy about my trust issues with the female nature. "Why would I go to 'therapy' for something that isn't an issue for me? If women have a problem with themselves, they're more than welcome to change."
/r/MGTOW12/07/20 06:59 PM
5

For women? Yes. For men? No.
/r/MGTOW12/07/20 06:33 PM
2

Their demands are high but their expectations are low. It's a pretty funny combination.
/r/MGTOW12/07/20 06:29 PM
12

The intellectual sinkholing is absolutely atrocious, even at Universities. Most people barely read/write at a middle-school level in college, let alone read.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen12/07/20 05:11 PM
1

Do u know how shallow you sound right now? I know that I am absolutely not shallow enough to spell "you" as 'u', firstly, and secondly it is an absolute reality that having personal attraction as one of many standards for relationship viability in addition to all other factors is the antithesis of "shallow." going after someone for just their looks is being a douche Nobody is talking about "going after someone for just their looks;" People with standards are rightfully stating that personal attr…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen07/07/20 12:35 AM
2

I don’t care if they are athletic or smart or good looking. Than that's your problem, and the problem of the disadvantaged progeny you may sire as a result. I care if they are a good person and if I can get along with them. That's nice, but there's more to a relationship than that. My criteria is fine. You can choose to not have standards if you want, but that's on you. If yours relies on how much they can lift or how well they can do math then I think you’re the one with the messed up criteria …
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen06/07/20 09:38 PM
2

Beautiful people are more intelligent and more highly educated Attractive people are more athletic When you screen for beauty, you're also screening for mental and physical value. Nope, not at all. You are objectively incorrect, and your criteria for partner selection is fundamentally flawed.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen06/07/20 09:30 PM
2

The intelligence, beauty, cognitive and physical prowess, and genetic makeup of your partner "don't matter at all" in your words? Each of these things is positively correlated to "looks."
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen06/07/20 06:13 PM
9

What an excellent follow-up to your prior comment on the matter of Male vs. Female love. Thank you!
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen05/07/20 08:56 PM
1

Please format your comments with paragraph breaks, friend.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen05/07/20 05:41 PM
3

"true equality comes from treating people unequally" Your words, not mine. The fact that you're devolving into insults just demonstrates that you've already lost, don't have anything to say, and you know it. Again, bye.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/07/20 04:23 PM
4

both [men and women] should work toward treating one another equally. Thank you for making the exact point I'm making, and thank you for agreeing with me. Since women are not, in the context of the OP, it's on them to change. They don't get to simultaneously demand equality and then not practice what they preach. Have a nice day.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/07/20 04:20 PM
2

Expecting women and men to behave the same isn't equality, in your eyes?
/r/PussyPassDenied05/07/20 02:29 AM
1

Shame that you're unable to contribute anything of value. Good bye.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/07/20 01:41 AM
2

Women are the gatekeepers of sex, and men are the gatekeepers of commitment. If you understood gender dynamics you'd already know this. Now answer the question or stay out of the discussion.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/07/20 01:07 AM
3

Unsuccessful people typically are incapable of understanding successful people, especially when it comes to what they do and why they do it.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/07/20 12:16 AM
8

"Any man who must say 'I am the king' is no true king"
/r/PussyPassDenied05/07/20 12:13 AM
4

What part of equality consisting of equal treatment and equal behavior do you not understand?
/r/PussyPassDenied05/07/20 12:11 AM
4

It apparently originated in 1971, from a group of California high school students: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/420_(cannabis_culture)#Origins
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen04/07/20 07:03 PM
8

I can't fathom any reason that any quality man would want a substance abuser to birth, raise, or parent his children.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen04/07/20 07:00 PM
5

Can confirm that it's literally just a meme-tier status symbol in these people's eyes.
/r/MGTOW03/07/20 06:57 PM
1

Definitely not, but at least not the eyesores that are the corporate lifers.
/r/MGTOW02/07/20 10:58 PM
21

Historically not a very "winning" strategy
/r/MGTOW01/07/20 11:18 PM
1

BLM is about winning racism, not ending racism.
/r/MGTOW01/07/20 08:07 PM
0

Dude...how did you even get to the point of looking at hair color as an issue. The transitive property applies to neon hair; By itself, neon hair is not an issue (unless you find it unattractive, which a large number of guys do), however it is one of the near-infallible indicia of someone with problems.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen30/06/20 06:59 PM
3

lol
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen29/06/20 08:44 PM
3

If you have kids, put those little fucks to work. Daily. They can't have a minute that isn't massive exercise, or massive labor. Otherwise you get this made up shit. The sentiment is nice, but this advice is massively idiotic from a childhood development perspective. Unstructured and unscheduled free time plays a crucial role in growth, maturation, and health.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen29/06/20 08:27 PM
6

I don't think the whiny complainer in the OP understands that the very fact she hates this qualifier in the man's profile and refuses to consider him is exactly why he has it in his profile. Congratulations, honey, it's working exactly as intended, and you've shown your true colors which further vindicates his actions If she's not there for you, then she's there for what you provide. If she has an issue with your lack of provision, then she has no interest in you. If she's not interested in you,…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen28/06/20 07:36 PM
4

I'm looking forward to it.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen28/06/20 04:43 AM
56

Imagine the insane reality of the following: "So you willingly fuck people all day who you don't care about, but you're not interested in fucking the person you (ostensibly) love, (ostensibly) care about, and (ostensibly) are in a relationship with?" This is how every relationship with a "sex worker" ends up, and the only way it makes sense is the male-female dichotomy of what constitutes "love" as /u/loneliness-inc has spelled out so wonderfully in past posts: Male love is centered around givin…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen28/06/20 12:33 AM
23

Ah, "Sex Worker," newspeak for "whore."
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen27/06/20 10:59 PM
-1

While I fully understood your comment, you clearly didn't understand any part of mine; Every part of it was done fully intentionally. Work on your comprehension skills before you go too far, and especially on your understanding of formatting.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen27/06/20 09:23 PM
-2

Women are wolves? No.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen27/06/20 06:43 PM
8

Just like the transgender fad is revealing, men are better at being women than women themselves.
/r/MGTOW27/06/20 04:17 PM
5

Agency is the capacity of individuals to act independently, to make choices and decisions of their own free will.
/r/MGTOW25/06/20 08:22 PM
13

A blank, borderline-unfocused gaze that manifests itself in people who are emotionally detached.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen25/06/20 08:01 PM
3

You can immediately distinguish the insecurely self-righteous and over-compensating idiots when they try and use the "maturity" line of attack in lieu of anything with actual substance.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen25/06/20 03:17 PM
69

Women want the wedding, not the marriage.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen25/06/20 05:06 AM
16

Quite literally, she is fuckzoned. Congratulations, you're now in a position commensurate to that of the majority of men, so Feminism got you what you wanted; Equality. You don't get to complain about fair turnabout.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen24/06/20 05:37 PM
3

"Purpose[ful]ly ignoring" implies that someone cares/notices. "Clueless" implies that someone is incapable of caring/noticing. Here's the actual reality: HVM are busy, productive, and valuable. They don't have the time for idiotic games; If you're an adult, you'll act like it and directly communicate. If not, then you aren't worth their time. They notice, it's just that they don't care.
/r/MGTOW17/06/20 10:14 PM
1

The only reason that women win arguments is that only idiots argue with women.
/r/MGTOW08/06/20 04:57 PM
1

They don't want to end whatever race conflict exists, they want to win it.
/r/MGTOW08/06/20 04:56 PM
16

Broken people wondering why they're broken as they continue pursuing the very things that broke them.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen06/06/20 10:35 PM
35

The echelons of success are comprised of people who make that much in an hour or two. Her belief that $220 is a lot belies her own lack of value.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen06/06/20 12:45 PM
6

The type of woman you're probably looking for is unlikely to be on social media or dating apps. AWALT If you're looking for a wife who desires a man who looks at the world, decides it's fucked and he's just going to stop trying, then carry on, you'll find her. Unicorns don't exist.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen01/06/20 07:04 PM
4

That's very useful, I'll look into it. Thank you!
/r/MGTOW30/05/20 12:23 AM
5

Why South Dakota?
/r/MGTOW29/05/20 11:41 PM
1

A woman's primary directive is emotional conquest/dominance. It's a frame check, a shit test, and an attempt to foment drama while seeking more and better.
/r/MGTOW29/05/20 05:28 AM
13

They generally don't understand basic economics
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen27/05/20 06:12 PM
10

Who said that cheating means nothing?
/r/MGTOW26/05/20 06:12 PM
20

Nobody said that they didn't.
/r/MGTOW26/05/20 05:07 PM
21

That's not how anorexia looks.
/r/MGTOW26/05/20 02:30 AM
1

Your opinion, like you, is irrelevant. Bye.
/r/MGTOW24/05/20 10:01 PM
1

So defensive! Are you surprised that people on Reddit will judge you by what you post? Deal with it. So headstrong and ignorant! Are you surprised that you're incorrect? Deal with it.
/r/MGTOW24/05/20 09:55 PM
1

You do you. You don't get to Kafkatrap. You know nothing about me, and your inferences thus far have been 100% incorrect. Back off.
/r/MGTOW24/05/20 09:50 PM
1

Dating =/= Marriage
/r/MGTOW24/05/20 09:42 PM
1

Dating =/= Visiting Prostitutes
/r/MGTOW24/05/20 09:35 PM
12

I can guarantee you that he didn't kill a kid with autism. How about you actually make whatever point you're trying to make, and state it in straightforward English without casting any idiotic aspersions.
/r/MGTOW24/05/20 06:14 PM
2

MGTOW =/= Celibacy
/r/MGTOW24/05/20 04:47 PM
5

You get to cite exactly which rule you think it is breaking, since you believe it doesn't belong, and then this discussion can continue.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen22/05/20 10:56 PM
7

He was her boyfriend. And she chose her partner poorly, in addition to making very poor choices after and during the fact. She thought she could trust him cause they were in a relationship. See prior. Obviously, she made a mistake and shouldn’t have sent him the pic. Yes. That is the point of the post. It isn’t like she was being an entitled cunt like some of the posts on this sub. Entitlement is not the only requirement for posts here. I just don’t think OP’s post fits the criteria on this sub …
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen22/05/20 10:51 PM
5

What behavior in this story is self destructive? Did sharing nudes with someone of questionable character result in a negative outcome?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen22/05/20 10:29 PM
3

Shaming language aside ("What the fuck is wrong with you guys?"), I'll answer their question of How does this fit in this sub? by directly quoting the sidebar: "The reason women end up here is because their behavior is not exposed as the lucid, self-destructive, feminist ideology that it is. And we're here to help Good Men guard their commitment and resources by exposing women who would make poor life partners and mothers of their children."
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen22/05/20 10:02 PM
1

Thank you, I appreciate the support.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen22/05/20 08:59 PM
2

At this point, if you aren't even able to put together a proper sentence, you aren't wife or mother material and we are not dating.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen22/05/20 07:41 PM
-2

Nobody is "looking" for anything. I pointed out why she fits this sub, and the moderation team is in agreement on that. It's not up for debate, so take it or leave it.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen21/05/20 09:33 PM
-6

Honestly I don’t get what’s up with this sub. This sub is dedicated to exposing all the women who complain about wanting a "good man" when all they have left to offer is their depreciating looks and narcissistic mentality. She’s got 4 kids which isn’t ideal She's a single mother who brings nothing to the table apart from entitlement and age. She’s clearly had a divorce. You are directly stating that she already had a partner, and for whatever reason the marriage ended (statistically by her own d…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen21/05/20 09:07 PM
2

Sounds like interacting with my kids at the dinner table. First rule is you have to ask specific leading questions, not broad open-ended questions that lend themselves to one-word answers. The unfortunate reality is that a vast majority of these people have little to no substance, and their daily lives are typically and commensurately devoid of anything substantive. Asking them open-ended questions frequently prompts them to engage minimally or become defense. Asking them direct questions causes…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen19/05/20 07:46 PM
1

That's two words too many. You'll likely just get a "Good" or an "Ok" in response.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen19/05/20 07:40 PM
27

"The strong do what they can and the weak suffer what they must"
/r/MGTOW18/05/20 10:55 PM
6

The Left thinks the Right is evil because the Left is incapable of understanding, appreciating, or valuing Authority, Loyalty, and Sanctity. The Right thinks the Left is stupid because the Left is incapable of understanding, appreciating, or valuing Authority, Loyalty, and Sanctity, and because the Left supplants these values with blind compassion, overwhelming emotion, and equality of outcome. Source: https://theindependentwhig.com/haidt-passages/haidt/conservatives-understand-liberals-better-t…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen18/05/20 09:34 PM
4

"I'm 6 foot 6 inches. Those are two measurements."
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen18/05/20 09:18 PM
2

Piracy is a licensing issue, not a possession issue.
/r/MGTOW16/05/20 03:08 AM
78

A friend was just on a date late weekend where this exact thing happened. The guy is well-off from several business/investing ventures, but he's also ridiculously disciplined when it comes to money (thus the financial success). He asks her out, it's just a little "Let's get to know each other" thing over a cup of coffee at a cozy diner, and she gets offended when he asks for separate checks after she verbatim told the waiter "He's paying" while ordering. He immediately nixes the date, and she ap…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen16/05/20 01:28 AM
7

Projection and deflection are hallmark female traits
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen15/05/20 12:19 AM
1

Just focus on having at least 1 lb of protein for every pound you weigh I'm assuming you meant one gram of protein per pound of body weight. Excellent post though, thank you for putting it together.
/r/TheRedPill14/05/20 06:43 PM
9

"Well-educated" unfortunately means nothing in today's world. Higher education used to be the exclusive province of the cognitive elite; It has now been watered down into nothingness by and for bitter ankle-biters who want status and success without the requisite high-functioning intelligence/knowledge that it used to require.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen14/05/20 05:20 PM
2

Yikes, sweety, who hurt you?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen14/05/20 03:50 PM
6

"A gender with no concept of true loyalty questions why try loyalty exists"
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen13/05/20 04:53 PM
15

“No one here hates women... We just understand them.” Apparently y’all don’t. You just have this skewed idea of what women are. That's Strike Two for you with your NAWALT inanity. She states that she gets approached by men who are both younger and older than her. And she rejects all of them. So where does that tell you that she used to date older men Reality and experience are the contextual keys that you're either unable or unwilling to understand. when the whole point of her post is that she w…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen12/05/20 11:42 PM
7

Yes, and they are going to be shamed for the following behavior until they stop doing it: Women in their 20s have numerous opportunities to date the decent men they claim to want, but many reject or friendzone these men for jerks and promiscuity. She takes advantage of a man's kindness for attention and favors, then accuses him of thinking he was entitled to sex just for being nice. But when she's in her 30s with depreciating looks, jerks who won't commit, the likelihood of being a single mom, a…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen12/05/20 11:10 PM
9

Where does it imply she used to do that. Seems like you men just are trying to find reasons to hate women and victimize yourselves. Bunch of pussies:) You're going to be delighted to hear about this sub's rules: 1. No shaming men for any reason. Saying "you men" are a "bunch of pussies" not only is idiotic and ignorant, but it also is in violation of this rule. And you already know this, otherwise your inane comment wouldn't have a cutesy ":)" at the end, which is condescending and tantamount to…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen12/05/20 10:11 PM
2

The woman AND the man are the perps. Women, as the sexual selectors, bear 100% of the responsibility for the quality, type, and consequences of the partners that they choose. You don't get to blame men for women's faulty partner selection, and the resulting outcomes of their actions and choices.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen12/05/20 09:45 PM
6

When you're a man under 5/10. For women, that's every man who's under an 8/10.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen12/05/20 09:40 PM
16

Maybe you are some kind of super monk but most men aren't when offered sex from an attractive woman. Speak for yourself.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen11/05/20 12:01 AM
23

Lol do you turn down alot of sex? Part of the problem is we can't help ourselves. There is no 'we' here in your scenario, just you.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen10/05/20 10:34 PM
16

Monogamy is faithfulness within a relationship, not related to having multiple relationships Monogamy (noun) the practice or state of having a sexual relationship with only one partner the practice of marrying only once during a lifetime the practice or state of being married to one person at a time. At best, you're stretching the third definition to quite literally describe serial monogamy in the context of successive sexual relationships, which still is a strike against long-term/permanent rel…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/05/20 11:03 PM
1

No worries. All the best.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen07/05/20 07:43 PM
1

don’t not know You're saying you do know them? I know she will ruin some man’s life. Absolutely.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen07/05/20 06:21 PM
3

You can fire people. It will cost tho. How and why will it "cost"? But most contract come with a probationary period where any side (the employee or the employer) can decide to stop it fast. At-will employment is not at odds with any of the content in the OP. For example, for most IT it is 4 months which can (and often is) renewed for 3 months. Even if you're under 26yo all those protections are in effect, it sure has not been removed. That's tantamount to the exact scenario stated in the OP, an…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen04/05/20 09:34 PM
5

So what is he wrong about, and how?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen04/05/20 09:18 PM
5

You've got to work in some alliteration for extra panache. Use a variant of "Not my progeny, not my problem" such as "Your progeny, your problem."
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen04/05/20 04:14 PM
6

Women only date/marry up, and sometimes across, in SMV/RMV/MMV.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen30/04/20 07:40 PM
16

It's been said in more eloquent ways by other people, but it definitely still rings true: If women are sex objects, then men are success objects. Women are aroused by status (i.e. social value/prestige).
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen29/04/20 03:41 PM
8

"If that's a problem..." It's not a problem at all for me; It doesn't affect me. And it won't.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen26/04/20 12:39 AM
4

Good point. I'll amend it.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen25/04/20 07:49 PM
18

Women rate all other women as "good women" because women have a 400% higher in-group bias: https://www.apa.org/monitor/dec04/women
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen25/04/20 07:17 PM
25

Companionship is hard to come by And by "companionship" you're meaning the entire concept of "commitment" writ large, with all of its requisite high-value presuppositions. Here's a little cheat-sheet for you: Men are the gatekeepers of commitment. Women are the gatekeepers of sex. If a woman is not "getting" commitment from the people she wants it from, then she simply does not measure up to the standards of that class of people.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen25/04/20 05:33 PM
14

If you use words like "finna" in a sentence then you were never worth anything to begin with.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen24/04/20 10:43 PM
2

Fat No. Your mental issues are not going to be a part of my life or my children's life. Old ("29" = 30+) No. I'm not interested in having children with a higher likelihood of birth defects or in entering into a relationship with someone who inevitably has a ridiculous list of demands. Child(ren) from another man No. Your mental/social/political/lifestyle issues that resulted in children out of wedlock are not going to be passed on to my progeny, and your lack of values and morals are not going t…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen22/04/20 07:24 PM
11

The pickings for women are not as vast as the pickings for men Yes, dumbass, that is a direct byproduct of women outright refusing to date/fuck/marry at or below their current (perceived) value. Small shock that this occurs when/because you rate your own value as "above average" while rating 80-90% of men "below average." We are literally picking through a pile of shit when it comes to men, Like attracts like, sweetie. Also see above. We are picking through men who don't equal up to what the fuc…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen21/04/20 10:17 PM
11

I have this crazy theory that liberalism is feminine and conservatism is masculine. Very correct. The difference between male and female dominance hierarchies is such: Men seek to maximize end result, taking whatever (and seeking whatever) amount of direct conflict and cooperation is necessary to arrive at that result. They do not necessarily care about the “group” per se, as its relative level of internal cohesion and conflict is irrelevant to the achievement of the external goal’s achievement …
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen21/04/20 06:15 PM
2

This entitled nag needs to learn a lesson in humility: You are not entitled to anyone else's money. People do not owe you their money for existing. People do not have to justify their (financial) decisions to you. You do not get to tell people what to do; You are not their master. People do not have to obey your whims; They are not your slave You are not a victim because you don't understand economics Your goods are -amusingly- elastic If people are unwilling to "support" the entertainment that …
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen20/04/20 06:22 PM
16

“Do good guys still exist?!??” "Good guys will exist as long as good girls exist"
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen20/04/20 04:00 PM
1

They are incapable of handling the disconnect between reality itself and their perception of reality. In the same vein, and due to the same underlying cognitive dissonance, they are either unable or unwilling to understand the different between 'intimidating' and 'insufferable'.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen20/04/20 12:49 AM
16

You caught me. The entire sub is actually just comments I write to myself from my hundreds of alts. Wouldn't you agree, /u/satanic_hamster?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen18/04/20 04:45 AM
27

I'd be printing money faster than the Fed if I could exercise put options on women over 30
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen18/04/20 02:24 AM
1

One of the most comprehensive sources: https://calcsd.netlify.app/
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen17/04/20 09:46 PM
105

I've used "You aren't hot enough to be this stupid" to great effect
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen16/04/20 03:52 PM
3

Who is this "you guys" you're referring to?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen15/04/20 11:45 PM
3

No sane person attempts to date women who are over 30. Men age like wine, women age like milk.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen15/04/20 05:37 PM
2

That's problematic. Her body is -at best- a 5/10.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen14/04/20 06:41 PM
8

It's a type of apex fallacy. They assume that the traits that they find most attractive are "high value" traits, and that the men who evidence them are thus the highest-value men. They then assume that these are the "best" values and the best men that the male gender can produce, and construct their inane criticism of "men" around that. They of course don't realize that they: Don't understand value Don't understand men Don't define men or masculinity Don't determine what constitutes "high value"
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen14/04/20 12:43 AM
9

"MDIT" is a shallow attempt at tu quoque deflection. Anyone alleging "MDIT" is only capable of pointing out lowest-common-denominator traits from cherry-picked male demographic subsets. MDIT - Yes, low-class and low-quality men do shitty things. The point is that they are low-class and low-quality as evidenced by these behaviors. Comparing bottom-of-the-barrel things from the male gender to normative female behavior/demands/action/speech/practices just goes to prove that females are the ones wit…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen13/04/20 11:35 PM
28

Women, if you want a relationship with a discerning, self-respecting, and quality man, he is going to ask you how many people you have fucked. If you refuse to answer, you are not relationship material. If you answer with a number is greater than one, you are at a 50% risk of divorce and you are not relationship material. I can hear your desperate invective and aggressively frantic histrionics already building, so here's how this works: No, you aren't the "best" option No, there are better and y…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen12/04/20 04:36 PM
100

You're 30 and demanding that people not "waste your time." Here's some news: you have wasted all of your prime time. You are now leftovers, and you will take whatever you can get. You are out of time. It is impossible to "waste" what you don't have. Get used to it, get over it, get some wine.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen12/04/20 04:19 AM
124

Your demands are unreasonable and your value proposition makes zero sense in the context of the former. As soon as this magical unicorn of a person appeared (and if they did everything you wanted) you would immediately begin to dislike them and look for something better precisely because he did -and was- everything you wanted. It does not matter what you do; You will never be happy.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen12/04/20 04:03 AM
18

I enjoy saying something inane like "5'13"" or "4'27"" just to throw them off and make them think
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen12/04/20 02:09 AM
9

I'm glad that things turned out for the better.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen11/04/20 09:33 PM
5

This is a crosspost from the Tinder subreddit
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen11/04/20 06:38 PM
28

I was struggling to come up with a better way to say 'Omega Bottom-feeder' but defaulted to ye olde "AF/BB"
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen10/04/20 12:43 AM
224

"I have been Alpha Widowed and am incapable of pair bonding. I pine after my crush with the fervor of a lovestruck /r/NiceGuys Beta. Due to this, I am unable to find my current SO attractive, and am training myself to loathe his touch and presence." AF BB is proven once more.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen10/04/20 12:07 AM
1

I agree, up to a point. I'm not saying you should be Cptn Save-a Hoe, completely oblivious about her past. But I'm saying that there is such a thing as too much info when it comes to her ex, especially since: Ah, got it. That make sense. Just to be clear, "caring that much" in this context refers to asking how many times she and her ex had sex, on which positions, or if they had anal, like the OP wanted to know. Also a fair point. This might as well be true, but we humans are notoriously bad at …
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen09/04/20 11:59 PM
1

Well, if you care that much about past behavior There is no "caring that much about past behavior;" If you have standards at all then you care about past behavior. There is no exception. Either you have standards or you do not have standards. Past behavior is the only -and best- indicator of future behavior. and you find out that your deal is much better than what the guy ahead of you got, would you lower your demands? That's not how any aspect of reality works. If you are getting the best busin…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen09/04/20 10:56 PM
1

Nobody has any obligation to do anything specific sexually. And nobody has any obligation to do any amount of commitment, any amount of time investment, any amount of energy investment, or any amount of resource investment. The point is not what people are "obligated" to do; The point is what they are reasonably expected to do based on normative standards, past behavior, and willingness to engage in transactional mutualism. Relationships are fundamentally transactional. If you're part of a trans…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen09/04/20 08:33 PM
7

There's this weird Transitive Property thing that women do: Whoever they've dated/fucked/married in the past, they assume some aspect of that person's mannerisms and assume that -as their SO- they have the exact same status and role as that person (if not more), and should be afforded the same treatment that that person receives. You see it with things like the "You will address me by my husband's rank" bumper sticker, and the corresponding situations that that mentality spawns. To quote some el…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen09/04/20 06:43 PM
8

A bold strategy, Cotton, let's see if it pays off
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen09/04/20 06:30 PM
117

The folks over on the Tinder subreddit will jump down your throat for daring to state that Tinder is a hookup service, not a wedding app, and that any woman looking for "No hookups" is an idiot who will jump into bed at the drop of a (Chad's) hat.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/04/20 03:08 PM
300

Notice the subtle blame shifting in Part 1, and the attempt at reframing the entire thing through historical revision to conveniently avoid personal responsibility. "All this sex in College just happened to me" "I hated all that icky sex" "They pressured me into that icky sex stuff" "They forced me perform oral sex on them by threatening to leave me alone" "I hate blowjobs and would never subject my husband to such terrible indulgence in his desires" Here is what the slattern is actually saying:…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/04/20 04:37 AM
4

Well said. It's just another extension of the "Oppressor/Oppressed" dichotomy that Marxists love to wallow in; Men are always the oppressor since their superiority is assumed, and women are always the victim since their inferiority is the only "logical" extension of their faulty presupposition about men's position in their inane hierarchy. Like you say, this conveniently leaves out the social and sexual power that women wield.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen06/04/20 11:31 PM
9

Absolutely. Feminism seeks to embitter women against men because women are not men. It is just a veiled attempt at instituting female supremacy under the guise of achieving actual equality.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen06/04/20 10:37 PM
42

So, according to feminism if I go out with her I'm exploiting her for having more 'moneypower' and if I marry her I deserve being divorce-raped and handing over everything I make for 18 - 25 years so she can have a better lifestyle. This is something that's particularly insidious about the Feminist/#MeToo agenda: They posit that any relationship involving a "power" disparity is inherently predatory and fundamentally exploitative. This facile oversimplification of theirs completely ignores fundam…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen06/04/20 09:04 PM
92

Funny how she makes no mention of body fat percentage. This looks very much like a stereotypical Filipino gold digger profile, so I'm sure not much thought was put into it apart from vomiting Prince Charming traits.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen06/04/20 04:13 AM
15

The post-breakup meme rings true: https://laughonly.com/pictures/140.jpg?ignore
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen04/04/20 08:12 PM
56

You think? That's the problem: she doesn't.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen04/04/20 08:10 PM
61

Look at this ex post facto rationalization: "I feel like garbage, I will blame everyone and everything except for myself for the consequences of my actions"
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen04/04/20 06:40 PM
10

It's old, but still applies: "Your lack of planning does not constitute an emergency on my part"
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen03/04/20 10:11 PM
22

In a shocking turn of events, women of ill repute who are too dumb to do anything other than whore themselves out are also too stupid to understand economics and market dynamics, or differentiate between correlation and causation. Imagine, if you will, this scenario: Coca Cola starts selling a product that is only attractive to low-quality people; Only ugly and stupid people buy and consume Coca Cola. Coca Cola executives then start complaining amongst themselves that "Coca Cola makes people stu…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen03/04/20 05:51 PM
4

DJ isnt the same as musician though The vast majority of people are ignorant to this fact, and continue to conflate them.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen03/04/20 12:22 AM
3

Much appreciated.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen01/04/20 04:16 AM
6

I freely admit that I could be wrong too. I interpreted it as "I am pregnant and need a provider", with the added dangling carrot of sexual incentive to rope in thirsty betas. She definitely isn't looking for a good man; she's looking to exploit men with "good man" traits.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen31/03/20 06:59 PM
12

It clearly fits this sub because, from the outset, she intimates that she's seeking a supporting and providing partner while pregnant with another man's child and while whoring herself out via hookup seeking and floating the exchange option of "wanting help" in exchange for "show[ing] more pics". This absolutely is in keeping with the ethos of the sub this sub is dedicated to exposing all the women who complain about wanting a "good man" after dating jerks and riding the cock carousel fits Rule …
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen31/03/20 06:23 PM
93

"Well, Becky just got a boyfriend who's 6'4", and that bitch is soo annoying and catty, there's no way I shouldn't be able to do better than her, so I'm putting my foot down and never settling for anyone who's less than 6'5" and making at least $100,000 less than anyone who's under 6'2", so there, that'll show her"
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen31/03/20 06:14 PM
8

Men are not strong enough to handle the sexual past of a woman they love. This is not a debate. You're right. It's not a debate. Your premises and presuppositions are incorrect, meaning your conclusion is also incorrect. Additionally, your entire assertion is inseparable from outright character attacks and shaming language, and is in fact a thinly-veiled Kafkatrap. There's no debating something that is predicated on irrelevant emotional preconceptions, and something predicated on logical fallaci…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen31/03/20 12:49 AM
2

No goal-post shifting with anecdotes and "...what if" scenarios. Decent men are not dead-beats, and vice versa.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen30/03/20 02:03 AM
1

Anecdotes are not evidence of anything.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen30/03/20 02:00 AM
8

a decent man, who later became a dead beat The former (bolded) precludes the latter (italicized); they are mutually exclusive. You don't magically become a dead-beat.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen30/03/20 01:16 AM
2

Solipsism manifest
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen29/03/20 07:25 PM
34

I have always believed that widows are the only single mothers worth pursuing a relationship with.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen29/03/20 07:11 PM
3

Much appreciated. I'm not too familiar with her, but I'll look into her.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen29/03/20 07:08 PM
5

I'm with you there. I have no interest in power, just in my own autonomy.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen29/03/20 05:08 PM
37

"Men shouldn't be allowed to have standards because I don't meet them"
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen29/03/20 01:32 PM
24

Dating sucks for single moms because single moms suck at dating.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen29/03/20 01:31 PM
12

I can only assume that their rationale is simply, at best: "As someone who has seen that power is evil, I alone can wield that power since I recognize what is wrong with it and can thus (presumably) avoid its evil" And, at worst: "Yes, power is evil, but it's my turn to wield it"
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen29/03/20 01:22 PM
11

You're going to accept strong, silent, aloof, disinterested, and handsome. And you're going to like it.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen29/03/20 01:12 PM
30

Roger that: Postmodernism posits that there are two evils in the world, both of which are functions of power. These are categorization and competency, as determined through “discrimination.” Postmodernists think the world runs entirely on power, which is why they are fundamentally authoritarian; they will do anything and everything to wield their cudgel of power to make things as they think they should be since they see it as the one “true” objective force. This is done to the extreme of entirel…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen29/03/20 05:59 AM
54

It's a function of the modern Left-leaning decline of society, wherein the two great evils of the world are posited to be Categorization and Competency. When you accurately determine that someone is a whore, you are both categorizing them and also correctly gauging their competency as a potential partner. This is antithetical to Feminism, as a doctrine, and to Postmodernism, as a doctrine, since both of these ideologies are fomented in Marxism, which assumes a moral matrix wherein reality is bui…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen29/03/20 04:38 AM
31

I'd argue the semantics: Women know and understand that men fully believe as such, however, they ignore it due to solipsism.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen29/03/20 02:15 AM
13

It's unadulterated envy on their part.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen28/03/20 11:27 PM
42

You're attempting to apply reason to a scenario where reason has been ignored and abandoned.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen28/03/20 11:25 PM
97

"Huh, I would never have guessed you are the type of guys who like young ones." "Yeah, strange how I'm attracted to attractive people." This one is so fucking funny to toy around with too. It's always some variant of "You're immature/you're predatory/you're weird/I value maturity/I value experience/etc." when it's really just vindictive jealousy and envy.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen28/03/20 11:23 PM
6

A Participation Trophy Wife, if you will
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen25/03/20 12:48 AM
12

Society was much better when it actually shamed people for bad behavior
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen24/03/20 03:11 AM
3

Where do my I-Frames factor into this
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen23/03/20 04:29 AM
18

The entire female method of interface with reality is purely Machiavellian in both theory and practice
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen19/03/20 09:32 PM
8

It's not my job to reason you out of a position you didn't reason yourself into.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen17/03/20 05:47 PM
7

These gold-digging idiots (and others of their ilk, gender-irrespective) don't quite seem to grasp the traits and abilities that come with being high-status and high-wealth.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen14/03/20 03:49 AM
5

This is disturbing. Who refers to women as creatures? Incel creeps. This is disturbing. How can someone be so dumb they don’t understand an obvious verbal caricature of character traits? Idiotic white knights. See how your shaming language and obliquely faux outrage contributes nothing of value?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen09/03/20 09:38 PM
15

These morons cannot tell the difference between being insufferable and being "intimidating"
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen07/03/20 06:08 PM
2

Look at this pharagrap
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen04/03/20 11:50 PM
15

Life is like a box of chocolates: it doesn’t last as long if you’re fat
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen27/02/20 05:48 PM
17

“I don’t need to fuck right now because I’m going to the gym” or “I’m fucking and I’m going to the fucking gym” etc.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen27/02/20 05:47 PM
4

She is devoid of value or substance, and exists only to leech value off of those who tolerate her presence.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen27/02/20 03:47 PM
5

Either one is an immediate disqualification.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen23/02/20 01:54 AM
7

Fucking ignoramus' and their ignorance of etymology
/r/MGTOW22/02/20 06:16 PM
1

POETIC JUSTICE
/r/MGTOW22/02/20 05:25 AM
3

Fucking lol at a roast being so good that someone got banned for it. That's the point, you retarded nimby mods It's like how the "Unpopular Opinion" sub always is just "Popular Opinions" with all of the actually unpopular opinions either downvoted, ignored, or deleted by moderators Abject trash, these people are
/r/MGTOW22/02/20 05:24 AM
1

"Men are bettering themselves with knowledge, success, status, sociability, and wealth, and I can't handle that" I can't imagine being so devoid of value and so fundamentally emotionally petty that it enrages me when other people better themselves are have the trappings of success and value.
/r/MGTOW22/02/20 05:12 AM
2

So, in typical female fashion, she constructed an emotional bogeyman from shallow surface-level stereotypes without applying an ounce of self-reflection or investigative analysis.
/r/MGTOW22/02/20 05:10 AM
2

"Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart he dreams himself your master."
/r/MGTOW22/02/20 05:07 AM
3

"He who cannot rule over himself will surely be ruled over by others" Also the good old “The mind commands the body and is instantly obeyed. The mind commands itself and meets resistance.”
/r/TheRedPill22/02/20 02:21 AM
1

Allegedly one orgasm. This is just a shallow ploy to justify her Light-Switch Effect after the fact with sympathy gaslighting.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen21/02/20 10:41 PM
6

I'm glad to see that "inspin" is being used more frequently. All the best!
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen14/02/20 04:35 AM
6

This shit right here is why women think all men are liars and cheaters Women think "all men" are "liars and cheaters" because, to women, 80% of men are invisible, and the top 20% of men that they're attracted to can do (functionally) whatever they want since women utterly fail to incentivize commitment. Further than that, women are the sexual selectors; whatever women select for will increase in scope, occurrence, and intensity. If all men that you encounter are "liars and cheaters" it is becaus…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen14/02/20 04:33 AM
1

No shaming language. Your tacit assertion that something is "wrong" with /u/Overkillengine is a shallow personal attack that's not going to fly around here. I suggest you edit your comment to not be so demeaning and rude.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen13/02/20 02:56 AM
2

This study may be related to the one you're looking for: https://ifstudies.org/blog/counterintuitive-trends-in-the-link-between-premarital-sex-and-marital-stability/
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen13/02/20 02:54 AM
12

Pareto*
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen01/02/20 02:22 AM
-1

Also whatever the “sentence gore” sub would be Some of this writing is atrocious Still, though, the message is good and the point is well-made
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen31/01/20 05:40 PM
13

“When people get used to preferential treatment, equal treatment seems like discrimination” - Thomas Sowell
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen21/01/20 05:41 PM
2

Sounds like a “her” problem more than anyone else’s; I guarantee she’s going to keep getting pumped and dumped until it happens again and she has lucky child number six (while the father fades away into the background) who’s even more of a burden with their extra chromosomes. Stupid and emotional people never learn that actions have consequences, so they keep doing what they want while the consequences keep piling up and getting worse and worse.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen20/01/20 10:51 PM
1

or someone who is annoyed at having her cleavaged ogled she sure is making an effort to display it Thus the overt (albeit unstated) assertion that it's a shit test
/r/TheRedPill20/01/20 02:50 AM
3

The opinion of someone who is incapable of telling the difference between insecurities and standards is worth absolutely nothing.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen19/01/20 09:39 PM
5

I mean that first part is a really shallow excuse, and we know it. You absolutely do not get to allege intentional intellectual dishonesty and bad-faith debating as an oblique ad hominem attack. People, when presented with the opportunity to use one of many words that mean the same thing, will invariably choose the word that's the easiest to use/say. In this case, the one with fewer syllables. But as for the second part, what's the difference between the two? One word has fewer syllables. What p…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen14/01/20 04:14 AM
2

Which word is easier to say? People default to words that have fewer syllables. Additionally, the two words aren't perfectly interchangeable. Saying someone "is a slut" is different in syntax from saying that someone "is promiscuous."
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen14/01/20 04:09 AM
1

Then replace "slut" with "promiscuous" in my original comment. The point still stands.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen14/01/20 12:20 AM
5

Accurately describing someone who evidences negative traits as such is completely normal and acceptable. Doing so is completely different from intentionally being malicious and insulting. Calling someone who is sexually promiscuous a "slut" is completely different from vindictively calling someone a "dumb whore."
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen13/01/20 11:52 PM
20

This is actually a fun one to bring up, especially when you can tell the husband is rather beta/cuckolded/henpecked/submissive. There's nothing more enjoyable in life than inducing cognitive dissonance in people, and it's ridiculously easy to do when you apply a pressure flip to force them into taking and defending a position (like their own marriage). The answers you'll get: I want a family/kids I want a companion/friend/relationship (S)(H)e makes me happy “It just made sense since (s)(h)e is m…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen12/01/20 12:53 AM
3

i so sorry pls 4give
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen11/01/20 12:20 AM
18

MGTOW =/= Celibacy
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen10/01/20 11:37 PM
37

I like option Q)
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen10/01/20 10:06 PM
73

E) You don’t deserve sympathy or victimhood points because you can’t handle responsibility
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen10/01/20 09:40 PM
39

Also because 99% of these entitled idiots don’t know what ‘coffee’ actually is. Spoiler: It’s not a tall cup of dairy and sugar with a slight hint of coffee. If they don’t even have the wherewithal to understand and state that they’re drinking sugary dessert drinks and not “coffee” then their opinion -like them- is irrelevant and worthless.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen10/01/20 09:39 PM
1

"I'm not comfortable being intimate with you if you're seeing other women." I've never had a problem with this one, but I've seen it lay low literally every other male (friend, acquaintance, or relative) who has had the same ultimatum pushed on them. My response when it was tried on me was "That's fine. I'm more than happy to be intimate with people who share the same feelings towards me." And then I went and continued to be "intimate" with these other people until/unless her mood changed. She d…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen09/01/20 02:50 AM
4

If I had to guess: Sunk Cost Fallacy Outright delusion Gambler’s Fallacy and Skinner’s Box-type operant conditioning
/r/MGTOW08/01/20 03:45 PM
1

This, basically. "Dating anyone?" Nope. "Interested in marriage?" Nope. "You're not gay, you're sexually attractive, you're valuable and clearly worth female attention...and you don't have a problem with this?" Nope. confused silence as they fail to realize that other options exist
/r/MGTOW08/01/20 02:57 AM
7

Zero people are endorsing pedophiliac sex tourism here. If they are, please point them out immediately and specifically so we can report them to not only the sub moderators but Reddit admins as well.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen06/01/20 02:04 AM
18

...and you offer what, exactly? You aren't presenting a very compelling value proposition here, princess.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen05/01/20 07:18 PM
3

"Most men lead lives of quiet desperation" - Thoreau
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen01/01/20 02:04 AM
6

Any man that request for DNA test is Bastard.periodt. You're illiterate as well as idiotic. any man who does DNA test on my children without my consent is also a Bastard You aren't supposed to outright state that "your children" aren't also his children through the mutual exclusion of syntax if you want to maintain the not-a-whore facade. Anything can happen that can make a woman pregnant for another man. "I am a cheating whore who cannot be honest with even myself about my own infidelity." Any …
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen28/12/19 01:33 AM
1

Ghetto trash is mad when other people have options and exercise them, and shocked that being a shrewish void of value doesn’t equal success and happiness More at 11:00 on this 60 Minutes special
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen24/12/19 07:56 PM
4

Illiterate ghetto hoes live in a state of constant embittered impotent rage Source: OP
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen24/12/19 07:52 PM
1

The rise in the feminine movement could very well be a subconcious test to see which men are able to rise against the affronts to their existence, and continue to stay true to their identity. The whole world is designed to test you from the beginning. Yes. Feminism is a macro level compliance test, and we're all failing it.
/r/TheRedPill22/12/19 06:09 AM
6

Not like you would ever really know. White-knighting and especially shaming language break sub rules 1 and 2, /u/fl03xx I strongly encourage you to modify your attitude and edit your comment
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen22/12/19 04:15 AM
1

Who are you talking to?
/r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre15/12/19 04:28 PM
2

Try again without the shaming language.
/r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre15/12/19 02:08 AM
16

I should come with a warning label I've worked with hazardous materials professionally. What PPE do I need before I contact you? Also, I hope you're not LOTO'd right now.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen14/12/19 08:07 PM
2

I can't imagine someone actually thinking a Kafkatrap would work. He never supported or defended either of your oh-so-clever sources. Pointing out how Vox, Vice, and Buzzfeed suck has nothing to do with supporting competing networks.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen03/12/19 03:32 AM
4

WE WERE THIS CLOSE TO GREATNESS
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen03/12/19 12:22 AM
4

"Oh, all these advancements, privileges, and unprecedented successes didn't get you what you wanted? I guess we'll roll them all back since they clearly didn't work."
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen02/12/19 11:03 PM
53

Women are unhappy because they can't fathom that they can't have it all. People who have an extreme excess of something are frequently unidimensional to the point of being bereft of all other aspects of 'normal' or even 'tolerable' life. Women look at obscenely-wealthy and ridiculously-successful men who work 80-120 hours a week, with no home life, no social life, no romantic life, no other hobbies/interests/qualities, barely-functional living habits, and see only someone making tens of millions…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen02/12/19 08:00 PM
1

https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Wannabe
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen01/12/19 07:27 PM
13

It has the same connotation (not specifically denotation) that "incel" does, as applied to the female gender. specially when they are specifically training each other and volunteering to be led down this path. The exact same argument could be made about everyone who falls under the "incel" moniker. It basically boils down to which gender is a gatekeeper of what. Males who are incapable of "getting" sex are "incels" (i.e. male losers). This moniker aptly describes the quality of people that fall …
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen30/11/19 01:22 AM
29

I've heard them called "Inspins" (Involuntary Spinsters), and it seems to have not only a much better sound but also function as a much more apt description.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen29/11/19 09:23 PM
14

The only reason that women "win" arguments is that only idiots argue with women
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen28/11/19 04:25 PM
3

There are apparently 4 people who fit my stats Seems way too low
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen28/11/19 01:23 AM
1

Natuurlijke gingers zijn best heet TIL I speak Dutch fluently
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen27/11/19 09:33 PM
6

They decry any and all hierarchies and/or meritocracies because they believe that all hierarchies are predicated around "domination and control." They out themselves as anti-Western Postmodernists and then wonder why people reject them outright. Postmodernism posits that there are two evils in the world, both of which are functions of power. These are categorization and competency, as determined through “discrimination.” Postmodernists think the world runs entirely on power, which is why they ar…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen27/11/19 09:13 PM
5

peral
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen22/11/19 06:09 PM
2

Do you want to revise your comment to something meaningful and/or worthwhile?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen21/11/19 10:21 PM
5

"If you give me six lines written by the hand of the most honest of men, I will find something in them which will hang him." - Cardinal Richelieu The fact of the matter is that no matter how good you are, someone can always find fault with you. If they're dedicated to seeing nothing but faults in others then that's what they'll find. Their mission in life is to undermine, tear down, confuse, anger, and stymie everyone who they come in contact with. These people -just like the person in the OP- a…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen19/11/19 06:40 PM
5

Correct, and that's the point: If you're not married to her it's much easier to simply walk away and cut all ties/contact when you don't have to worry about children, a divorce, continued contact, or (re)allocation of resources. It's good to hear that judges are coming around to the side of reason.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen16/11/19 05:24 PM
16

Excellent comment, thank you. This is just more fuel on the “Do not get married” fire that has been burning all the brighter as of late; not all women would, but any woman could.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen16/11/19 04:12 PM
6

Bitter Insufferable Draining Despondent Entitled Egotistical
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen15/11/19 03:19 PM
1

Ah, that makes more sense
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen11/11/19 08:15 PM
8

No top but OK ?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen11/11/19 08:12 PM
4

Women date/fuck/marry across and up This is an established fact of behavioral psychology That the author of this idiotic piece would claim otherwise belies her ignorance and idiocy
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen11/11/19 07:07 AM
11

(S)he looks more male than female
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen11/11/19 06:45 AM
2

I'm not reading your inane diatribe. You've been blocked.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen11/11/19 04:44 AM
0

Children are your responsibility, not your property I pity your kids or hope you never have any in case none Pot, meet kettle. /r/raisedbynarcissists has a table reserved for your progeny Go peddle your poor parenting elsewhere
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen11/11/19 04:31 AM
22

The thing is, though, that that statement doesn't sound impossible or stupid given the particulars of the male party making that hypothetical request "I am in the top 1% of adult males in America, and am looking for a traditional housewife who's pleasant and beautiful" sounds absolutely reasonable Maybe a better analogue to the dreck in the OP would be "Single, unemployed, and obese 45M living with parents seeking a virgin Victoria's Secret model who's willing to settle down immediately and star…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen11/11/19 02:19 AM
3

I can’t imagine being this disconnected from reality.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen11/11/19 01:10 AM
9

Also love the coward who countered with r/Men_of_the_Wall but immediately deleted it. That sounds like some angrily-petulant projection on their part. Men come into being at the wall; the way(s) in which they push past and overcome it define them and cause them to increase in value. They start at the bottom (by dint of being human doings without intrinsic value necessarily) and work their way out. They aren't defined by their biology; they are defined by what they do in spite of their biology an…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen10/11/19 02:25 AM
3

ive been used, ive been lied to, ive been cheated on, ive been heartbroken [sic] And? That's life. These all happen to everyone. Everyone acts in their own self-interest, and as it turns out people are more than happy to do whatever it takes to get what they want. It is your responsibility to grow up and learn how to cope with and/or recognize these things so they don't happen to you again. a girl should never say these things So then why are you saying them? This is the part of life where thing…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen07/11/19 06:30 PM
20

ignore raped I wouldn't be surprised if this wasn't an actual concept believed and promulgated by modern feminist dogma
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen06/11/19 06:17 PM
7

Alternatively, and maybe more realistically: She reveals her slutty past He reveals that he's fucked a bunch of people too, but isn't interested in someone who's been the town bicycle She gets mad and accuses him of double standards He simply states he got tired of the games and wanted to settle down, but he's not interested in a long-term commitment to/with her He breaks it off since she doesn't meet his standards She's angered, humiliated, and also still/more attracted to the guy She goes on t…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen06/11/19 01:09 AM
11

Observe the self-centered idiocy of someone who doesn't understand reality. I don't think women should entertain low[-]effort dates Effort corresponds to and scales with reward. In simple economic terms, the opportunity cost of multiple "low-effort" dates is vastly favorable compared to a single "high-effort" date for the people engaging in them, since if it goes awry or doesn't pan out (which, statistically, is likely to be the case the majority of the time) the loss of time/energy/money is neg…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen29/10/19 04:50 PM
9

And that's the proper mentality. You are the prize. They get one shot at you. If it's framed -ever- in a way where they are the prize in your head, you're playing a frame game that you've already lost.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen25/10/19 10:08 PM
4

"The only person who could possibly find me attractive is God himself" sounds much more realistic
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen16/10/19 08:46 PM
41

I'm strong, independent, and a bad ass. I'm interesting, I'm valuable, I'm special, I am everything that everyone else in the world is not. "Any man who says 'I am the king' is no true king." Take a break from huffing your vapors and rejoin us here in reality; if you were any of these, you wouldn't be complaining like you are and you wouldn't have the issues that you're complaining about. Your perception of yourself exists at a right angle to reality, and you are, in fact, nothing like what you …
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen15/10/19 06:36 PM
11

Less of her that's attractive
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen14/10/19 08:17 PM
13

There's nothing "anger phase" about it. Most people here despise unearned and unfounded entitlement, and find it amusing to observe delusional and clueless people flounder while reaping the consequences of their poor life decisions. There are also great discussions and informative posts here. That's not "rage" or "anger," that's information and entertainment rolled into one convenient package that's fun to pick through and discuss.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen13/10/19 03:21 AM
77

“When people get used to preferential treatment, equal treatment seems like discrimination.” - Thomas Sowell
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen03/10/19 07:38 PM
10

They clearly don't understand that stating facts based on and derived from observation of objective reality is not what determines objective reality. If I state that "The weight of an object does not affect the rate at which it falls when dropped," that thing is not correct because I stated it; it is correct because the material and substance that is asserted is objectively true/evident/provable and independently and repeatedly verifiable as such. This is how we quantify and qualify the world ar…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen01/10/19 07:46 AM
4

And immediately try to change him
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen27/09/19 10:52 PM
5

Be the man that's in high demand for those women.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen18/09/19 08:52 PM
1

Also, interestingly, in this article Feminism has been revealed to be a pipe-dream compliance test to myopically and tertiarily weed out the weak and propagate/isolate/guarantee dominant and desirable males through suborning and quelling "lesser" men. Feminism is an attempt at pre-empting the established structures that create men of high value, and substituting them with post-modernist Feminist structures. It's also a shallow attempt at establishing female superiority and supremacy in response …
/r/TheRedPill15/09/19 10:58 PM
17

If you don't understand how lying by omission is a betrayal of trust and willful deception then there's no point to you engaging in this discussion until you take a break and understand reality. You don't get to deflect. Read the linked comment and get back to us when you understand the issues at play.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen10/09/19 05:20 PM
14

Someone isn't expected to tell you anything. They're expected to be honest if they want to be in a relationship. If they can't handle that, then the relationship isn't for them. You're fairly inept if you believe that a woman (or anyone else) is expected to divulge every aspect of their personal life to you. Privacy exists for a reason. Read the top comment and get back to us when you understand the issues at play: https://www.reddit.com/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen/comments/d26vgw/young_carol_cannot…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen10/09/19 05:07 PM
14

And every single time that they don't get the man that they want, they project their self-loathing onto the man they have instead of directing that anger inwards towards introspection and self-improvement to get the man they want. Surprise, honey, it's not his fault that you're a low-value specimen.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen10/09/19 03:50 PM
77

There is Greenlander, an apparently successful engineer in his late 30s. In his early adult life, he was unable to ''get the time of day from women''. Now he's interested only in women under 27. ''The women I know in their early 30s are just delusional,'' he says. ''I sometimes seduce them and sleep with them just because I know how to play them so well. It's just too easy. They're tired of the cock carousel and they see a guy like me as the perfect beta to settle down with before their eggs dry…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen10/09/19 05:03 AM
182

Women are born into their value, men earn their way into their value. It's a pretty simple biological paradigm that men age like wine and women age like milk; that men age into their value and women age out of their value. Why are these people continuously shocked by objective reality?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen10/09/19 02:32 AM
6

The goal of Feminism is to indirectly reduce the pool of men who are earning more than women (by directly making more women earn more money). This goal being achieved, the pool of "economically-attractive men" is reduced in size. Supply has decreased while demand has commensurately increased. Feminism ultimately is antithetical to women's stated aims and end-goals.
/r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre08/09/19 02:07 AM
1

Thanks for the response. There's clearly no point in trying to have a discussion with someone so close-minded, so let's consider this over before it even started. Have a nice day.
/r/TheRedPill07/09/19 11:11 PM
2

False. Have and raise kids. Marriage is the best option for that Ok, I'll bite. Why is marriage the best option for having and raising kids?
/r/TheRedPill06/09/19 08:00 PM
28

A tl;dr list My standards are too high I am unable to communicate with the partners I select My partner selection methodology is fundamentally broken, like me I am either unable or unwilling to establish and enforce standards, values, and boundaries I'm angry because even though I project what I value in others onto myself in lieu of personal values, I mysteriously feel devalued and unsuccessful I am alpha-widowed Despite nothing working, I'm going to continue to not apply a single iota of self-…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen06/09/19 01:08 AM
15

I may be misremembering, but wasn't there also something like a '5%' rule? It was held that even if you were on absolute point with your gaming of social proof/preselection/venue choice/personal presentation/DHV/opener, all mitigating factors were completely nullified, and every single aspect of your approach and engagement were perfect, you had at best something like a 5% chance of success. That's why the numbers game was so stressed. 80% wouldn't even give you the time of day due to active dis…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen05/09/19 01:53 AM
42

I'm not gonna feel bad walking away from you to go home to go to bed alone Clearly you do. If you didn't, you wouldn't have written this "woe is me" soliloquy. Amusing how these people who proclaim themselves to be "smart, successful, and independent" are infinitely needy and outcome dependent.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen05/09/19 01:06 AM
4

Communion wine is a hell of a drug.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen04/09/19 07:17 PM
18

Solipsism. They all fancy themselves to be the heroine of "their" story, not realizing they're at best a 2D NPC that is just there as background filler for the real characters who actually have depth and substance and who actually drive the story forward.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen04/09/19 07:16 PM
14

The demand too much while providing too little. Historically not a very "winning" strategy.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen04/09/19 07:14 PM
19

Given that this is almost certainly from a self-proclaimed "religious" author writing for her "Christian" blog, the scenario is pretty boilerplate: Christian girls are raised being told that they're a supremely-valuable princess in the eyes of God. They're raised to expect absolute perfection and purity because they're constantly told that they're the embodiment of perfection and purity. They typically come from middle-class to upper-middle-class families (doctors, lawyers, high-functioning prof…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen04/09/19 07:08 PM
5

If you run just ridumentary numbers (that don’t account for all facets of the issue and are just facile raw individual-characteristic percentiles), she’s looking for at least the 0.0001% which is so laughably high-tier relative to her value that it’s likely impossible for her to comprehend.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen03/09/19 10:03 PM
11

SHE A QWEEN
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen03/09/19 06:32 PM
117

I don't think math is a suit of theirs at all, let alone a strong suit. 6'3" - 98th percentile 35 y/o male making $125,000 per year - 91st percentile 130+ IQ - 98th percentile Healthy and physically fit - 97th percentile Just these four requisite factors, combined in a single person, places that person so astronomically high on the value scale that there's essentially no comparison to anything on the female side apart from the upper reaches of beauty and intelligence combined. And they're going …
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen03/09/19 05:56 PM
2

All good points.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen02/09/19 08:16 PM
3

You can eat nothing but chocolate cake and lose weight. Eating clean is a constituent part of living a healthy life, but it's not a requisite for weight loss.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen02/09/19 07:55 PM
11

The entire issue is caused by eating too much. Thus the complete solution to the problem is "just eat less."
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen02/09/19 03:41 PM
10

The more pre-marital sex a woman has, the less likely the marriage is to not only stay together but also thrive and the more likely it is that divorce will occur. Additionally, the more pre-marital sex a woman has, the more likely she is to have mental/social/personal issues (i.e. "be damaged goods").
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen01/09/19 08:33 PM
1

Incorrect.
/r/MGTOW01/09/19 06:55 PM
1

His reasoning is exceedingly self-evident. Which part of it did you not understand?
/r/MGTOW01/09/19 05:42 AM
1

Yes, but that's because the population majority is white.
/r/MGTOW01/09/19 04:04 AM
1

Quoting an older comment of mine that seems pretty relevant: Essentially, society's most productive, innovative, determined, skilled, intelligent, and educated demographic is being told that they are worthless and need to essentially just give up and die in a hole. They're told this tacitly by people who offer little to no value in comparison and who have little to no actual real-world acumen or efficacy, especially in the long run. What do you think is going to happen when you literally force y…
/r/MGTOW01/09/19 04:03 AM
1

Demonstrably incorrect.
/r/MGTOW01/09/19 03:57 AM
1

A man who no longer has something to live for will very surely find something to die for. The man who accepts his death, who is determined with every fiber of being to make his death matter, and who is fundamentally resolved to make his actions have the greatest possible effect before he dies, is a very potent force.
/r/MGTOW01/09/19 03:54 AM
12

One of them even said that inside churches the worthwhile women constituted 60% of those attending. What an insanely idiotic outlook these people have. I'll be honest here: Throughout all of the churches I've been in during my formative and early-adult years, out of each congregation there were any where from at most one to four (and that four was out of a congregation of multiple hundreds) worthwhile women.
/r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre31/08/19 05:32 AM
7

If you play it right, it's even Chaotic Neutral.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen30/08/19 11:14 PM
19

The story of Joseph and Potiphar's wife is eminently relevant to the discussion. Since it's in the Bible, the Bible too is relevant to the discussion. Are you lashing out in some misguided anti-religious fervor, or are you just a general contrarian?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen30/08/19 09:47 PM
20

And not only are those people hilariously wrong, their idiotic opinion belies a fundamental ignorance and a low intelligence.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen30/08/19 06:36 PM
15

There was also a post on another female sub (I think GenderCritical) recently talking about how dangerous men are to them etc... and that we are "emotional" for telling them that the average guy isn't a threat to them. Once again demonstrating their general inability to understand objective reality and showing how they incessantly project. Women, primarily feminist extremists, have single handedly ruined male/female relationships. Couldn't agree more.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen30/08/19 06:29 PM
36

I also don't understand the "backlash" complainants; have they never bothered to read Machiavelli? Maximizing reward while minimizing risk is the ethos of success. If you don't understand something that can negatively affect you, either eliminate it or mitigate it. In this case, women, who seemingly cannot be predicted, understood, or relied on to make sense and act rationally. "Not all women would, but any woman could" is the mentality that they've fomented. Their counterparts are acting accord…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen30/08/19 05:49 PM
98

It's always interesting seeing people like this. Every time I see them, I'm reminded of Hannibal Lecter's "poor white trash" comment. You can visibly see their genetic stock and mental (in)ability in both their facial structure and their always-inferior application of makeup. Through some unfortunate combination of genetics they manifest this vacant, barely-together, clearly-low-class appearance. What you're describing, /u/pankajkcmax, is a combination of A wild- or wide-eyed vacant gaze evidenc…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen27/08/19 05:32 AM
18

In the same vein as /u/askmrcia's comment, I've seen this sort of thing happen first-hand. An acquaintance who comes from a decently-wealthy family (and who, through familial business connections and a large amount of self-initiative and hard work, is already a millionaire before he's hit 30) had a long-standing FWB come down with the flu a few days before their dinner reservation at a high-end place. Not wanting to waste the night, he opted to take a female mutual acquaintance instead. She was …
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen26/08/19 11:51 PM
9

lol are you so bereft of actual substance that you can't formulate an actual counter-argument and have to default to shaming language?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen26/08/19 11:28 PM
48

Imagine being shocked when feminist ideals and actions come home to roost. The overwhelming feminist dogma they've been spouting for decades has been such tripe as "You're not entitled to sex" (as if that was ever asserted) and "She's not yours, it's just your turn" (as if reciprocated commitment/value over time was tantamount to slavery). How many women have ignored men because they suddenly felt different? How many women have ended relationships on a whim, after untold extended amounts of time…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen26/08/19 07:00 PM
11

It's too damn funny. I tried to show him how to communicate and the importance of it in a relationship. "You're an unmarried knocked-up single mother who arrived here from a one-night stand. It's clear that you're mentally, socially, and personally broken on an almost unfathomable level. You don't get to lecture me on anything."
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen26/08/19 06:34 PM
10

Sexual wastrels reap what they sow Color me shocked that actions have consequences and personal responsibility isn't absolved by poor decisions
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen26/08/19 06:30 PM
3

This has to be a bot. There's no possible way somebody is so broken that they're just spouting random lorem ipsum placeholder sentences that make zero sense in relation to the profile picture.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen25/08/19 02:36 AM
71

"Your children aren't my responsibility. If you can't handle them then you shouldn't have them."
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen25/08/19 01:24 AM
2

Sometimes you run into people who are so incomprehensibly stupid and ignorant that it's impossible to do anything other than ignore them. "... I also don't understand why she would be so lacking of self-love to just show herself to strangers like this." is possibly one of the dumbest sentences I've ever read or heard in my life. It belies a total lack of understanding of every aspect of humanity and social function.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen23/08/19 12:49 AM
112

Yup. The first date is simple: If you're worth my time, coffee's fine.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen14/08/19 04:09 AM
32

"They did their best to ruin my reputation." This one is the best. No, sweetie, your reputation was ruined by your own actions, it just so happens that your reputation-ruination is now revealed.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/08/19 05:40 AM
24

Numbers 32:23 "...you may be sure that your sin will find you out."
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/08/19 05:38 AM
52

Not his progeny, not his problem.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen07/08/19 05:02 PM
11

Looking for a man... not a man-child Every male 18 or older is a man. I'm waiting with bated breath to hear what you believe comprises a "man." An equal partner who has his shit together and strives to continually grow That's pretty vague. Anyone who isn't an abject failure who's also slowly inching their way up a corporate hierarchy fits this bill. I'm independent with an amazing career that I love Nobody cares. These are the traits you're looking for in a man, so you project them on yourself. …
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen05/08/19 08:45 PM
7

Good point, I completely forgot to include that part when I responded to the guy. She doesn't even live with the guy. She has to actually initiate communication with him and travel to him to see him, which she willingly does over and over and over.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen04/08/19 04:25 PM
12

Look at this tangled web of overwhelming emotional turmoil. Observe the sheer sum of impossibly-convoluted feelings that manifest themselves here. Now imagine what this guy would have to deal with if he actually gave a fuck and tried to address and solve each of this chick's personal issues like a loving/caring/kind/empathetic boyfriend/husband/whatever. Imagine how overwhelmed he'd be. Imagine how much he'd have to sacrifice for the ever-transient whims of this person. Imagine the energy and ti…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen04/08/19 03:34 PM
9

This women is clearly suffering the consequences of her actions, borne out by a set of circumstances of her own creation. She’s the victim of abuse? She gets to walk away or end it via the authorities. Oh, she chooses not to? Clearly, no matter what she says, she doesn’t want that. She’s refused the advice and counsel of not only numerous medical professionals and her friends but also her own conscience? She’s made her choice. That’s how personal agency and responsibility work. Now begone, white…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen04/08/19 03:12 PM
4

It also smacks of sheer idiocy and self-righteous inexperience when people denigrate others for having expectations/standards/desires in a relationship by saying stupid backhanded things like "You aren't entitled to sex", as if that was ever an argument that was made. No, nobody is entitled to sex. Nobody asserted that either, because that's a stupid assertion. It's a trivial strawman attempt. The point of relationships is reciprocity. People provide value in a complementary manner. If the other…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen03/08/19 01:16 AM
8

That's a good point. I read further down in the comment chain and, given your position, I absolutely understand the import of establishing "I'm not comfortable." It's fucking asinine that this is what the world has come to, but you're beating them at their own game.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen02/08/19 06:33 PM
11

I've never enjoyed the "I'm not comfortable" deferral since it places the onus of the issue on the person saying "I'm not comfortable" as if they're the one in the wrong. The onus is (and should be plainly expressed to be) on the person "trying to come to me for dating advice." In lieu of "I'm not comfortable with that" I've found much better results with "I'm not interested" since it places the onus of interaction and justification on them and reminds them that they're encroaching not only on m…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen02/08/19 06:16 PM
45

"I've been Alpha-Widowed. I tried to overcompensate for this by throwing myself at random partners, but nothing worked. I met a guy who's objectively 'marriage material', but I'm so broken that I'm incapable of finding him attractive even though I just know I'm supposed to. He's consistent, he's steady, he's caring, and he's just boring. Please validate me."
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen01/08/19 09:23 PM
85

Fat and ugly person with a terrible personality and zero redeeming traits complains that people are apathetic towards their existence It's almost like she's in the exact boat that (metaphorically) the majority of men find themselves throughout their life. Not that the majority of men are fat/ugly/worthless, just that if you're a woman in that position you're roughly on par with the average man in SMV.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen01/08/19 01:46 AM
26

Why would a woman marry her dog? She's ignorant of what "marriage" actually is. She's fundamentally broken. It's a moronic and childish ploy for sympathy. It's a tacit attempt at shaming. She brings nothing to the table of value and nobody's interested. Here's the cold hard truth: Her expectations are too high, and her value is too low. The common trait that all of the answers to this dipshit question have is that the woman is the party at fault. Women wanted responsibility. Now they have it, an…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen01/08/19 01:40 AM
5

All girls keep the good ones around until the time is right The time is here The time is now If you actually want me then You'd want me now
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen31/07/19 02:06 AM
13

"If you didn't care about me in your 20s I'm not going to care about you in my 30s."
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen30/07/19 10:57 PM
15

I'm continuously amazed that people like this seemingly have absolutely zero capacity for self-reflection or objective analysis. You're 31 years old, you're clearly overweight based on the rolls and crease marks on your neck, and you're not only wearing makeup but also have some sort of filter/'shop work on the picture of your face. Despite the amount of reality-altering/"enhancing" work done to your appearance, you still demand "something real." Following that up, in what I can only assume is s…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen28/07/19 11:01 PM
3

To post the old classic: Feminism is not a shit test. Feminism is a macro level compliance test, and we're all failing it.
/r/TheRedPill26/07/19 08:18 PM
3

Pole fitness is "fitness" in the same way that prostitution is a profession.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen24/07/19 07:09 PM
36

Cheat on your husband, lie about your fidelity, betray your marriage vows, actively destroy and trample an essential institution for the propagation and stability of society? Yeah, you're right, you're actually the victim here. It's your husband's fault for not being perfect. I award you 50% of everything and a surfeit of victimhood points.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen24/07/19 04:08 AM
98

Immediate divorce. Infidelity is immediate grounds for termination of any relationship. There is no "acceptance" of sexual impropriety, especially when it's lived as a lie under the guise of a monogamy. You lie, you're out. You cheat, you're out. You're unfaithful, you're out. There is no compromise on this. If the relationship doesn't matter to the point that they don't treat it as sacrosanct then they don't matter and are immediately done. This is an unconscionable breach of trust.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen24/07/19 12:10 AM
1

You've managed to amalgamate a large amount of unsubstantiated personal opinions and anecdotes into some sort of veiled diatribe that doesn't make sense or jive with reality. I'm not sure what point you're even trying to make given how much you're all over the place throughout your comment.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen22/07/19 07:28 PM
9

Perhaps tangentially related; every time I hear that plea I can't help but hear Tool's "Why, oh why?" in my head.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen22/07/19 05:04 PM
7

Him: Literally God Her: "He's still not quite enough"
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen21/07/19 04:58 AM
8

Sentence 1 "I want a sociopathic pedophile" Sentence 2 "I am mentally ill" Sentences 3, 4, and 5 "I am mentally ill with a religious bent" Sentences 6 and 7 "I still want a sociopathic pedophile" Sentences 9-12 "I have no idea what I want, but I want it now." Sentence 13 "I refuse to work." Every fucking succeeding sentence "I bring nothing to the table." Verdict: NO
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen21/07/19 04:57 AM
5

They provide zero value apart from sexual attractiveness and then are shocked that their own standards pigeonhole them into the "not worth my time" category.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen19/07/19 06:39 PM
7

They don't seem to get that there is a value threshold for "functionally worthwhile" that dictates being "worth it" or not. Let's just arbitrarily peg it at an amalgamated 6/10. Once they fall below that, sure, they aren't devoid of worth, but their value is so low that they functionally aren't "worth it."
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen19/07/19 06:33 PM
3

Heyy ya'll. Im wild kitty [sic] All right... I dance on ralphs tables like i dance on your flat ass So you're...threatening me? My kitty litter smells like wild roses in the middle of august i drink hot sizzling semen like i drink the milk out of your mamas tits You're delusionally dangerous My kitty litter don't stink As if it wasn't obvious before: 🚩
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen19/07/19 05:51 PM
2

The best indicator of future behavior is past behavior. She's demonstrated that marriage and lifelong commitment was never truly a priority for her; instead, all she prized was having fun with new and exciting people. If she truly was marriage-minded, she would have done her damnedest to find and commit to a like-minded partner earlier on and to be the best spouse that she could be. The fact that she was not only duplicitous in hiding her past but also makes no apologies for or about it demonstr…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen17/07/19 04:58 PM
10

What my relationship needs is MORE TORQUE
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen16/07/19 11:32 PM
4

Alli says she could conclude that social conditioning has made it impossible for men to see women as more than just the sum of their appearance, but she won't. You can "conclude" whatever you want, that doesn't make it objectively correct. Reality is that you created a fake entity whose one redeeming trait was their sexual value on a service centered around sexual value and then proceeded to declare that, based on your idiotic methodology, "men only care about sexual value." You got out exactly …
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen16/07/19 06:43 PM
25

Well said. I enjoy how she keeps doing her damnedest to prove the adage “A woman’s prime directive is emotional conquest and dominance.” No matter how good things are, she keeps pushing for change and acquiescence. She finally got it when he abdicated the throne and let her have emotional sway over him. She wants nothing more than to achieve this, and when she does she immediately loses interest and moves on. That’s where our precious heroine finds herself; perpetually wanting what she can’t hav…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen16/07/19 03:05 PM
59

Profile/Personage Review "I'm 29" Wall.jpg fun outgoing a mum to 3 beautiful children so if that puts you off be sure to swipe left :smug: .... You can't spell, you can't take pride in even your writing, and you're either unable or unwilling to muster the basic focus and energy to formulate a proper sentence No man worth their salt would ever invest in you long-term based on how many negative traits you managed to display in a single line of text I'm just looking for a nice genuine guy to treat …
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen15/07/19 09:23 PM
23

Too little, too late.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen15/07/19 09:05 PM
13

Mach 5 lol at this guy saying 'we' like he's the elected spokesman for the entire male gender. Listen, buddy, feel free to wallow in your own ignorant impotence and vent to your 48 followers on social media. You don't speak for me and you don't speak for men.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen14/07/19 06:48 PM
54

And it cuts both ways. "Fine, I can never truly call you mine. Then you also have no expectation of any amount of commitment, resource, time, or attention from me. Either start treating this like it matters or you are done."
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen13/07/19 05:05 PM
9

If I could restate that with some alliteration: Feminism: All of the Recompense and Rewards, None of the Risk and Responsibilities
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen04/07/19 11:21 PM
63

Kind of like how she knows what she should do in life but doesn't do it anyway, her face knows she should smile but doesn't know how to do it.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen04/07/19 11:09 PM
20

Once again, emotionally myopic people (read women, in aggregate as a gender) demonstrate that they can't grasp basic things like game theory or economics. Did they really think that having harsher standards would truly cause all the unwanted sub-par men to just fade into the shadows and drop out of their lives while leaving only the top-tier men to validate and select them? The end result is that all men (especially those top-tier ones that women so desperately want) are just saying "Fuck that" …
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen04/07/19 05:38 PM
15

Their ridiculous stated standards -which are truly just a facile attempt to suss out Alphas- have had the opposite effect that they intended. It's just one more compliance test that's ended up backfiring on them. Women make rules for betas and break them for alphas. They in fact loathe beta males so much that they will happily work the job of the beta and remain single in perpetuity (crippling depression, mental issues, and a life lived in complete lack of marital/emotional/personal satisfaction…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen04/07/19 05:35 PM
35

It's like the "girl inches" vs "real inches" for dick sizes If you or I (or likely any one of the people on this sub) call someone an asshole, it's because they evidence poor quality of character and negative traits. If a girl calls someone an asshole, it's literally just an assertion of that person's agency and telling the world that they couldn't be dominated emotionally into a submissive/responsive state. Never forget that a woman's prime directive is emotional conquest. Anyone who refuses to…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen28/06/19 12:21 AM
48

The people that screech from the rooftops that "You aren't entitled to sex; her body, her choice!" are the same ones that attempt to emotionally bludgeon the OP into submission because they feel that a woman is entitled to a man's resources, attention, energy, and time.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen27/06/19 07:49 PM
6

"Any wife, unhappy life" sounds like a good response
/r/TheRedPill26/06/19 05:23 PM
2

Thanks! I saw you mention r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre earlier but didn't have a chance to take a look. I'll check it out and see about posting in a little bit.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen21/06/19 10:00 PM
11

Men are given a biological advantage that ensures that they always win in the long run when it comes to SMV. This is tempered by the opposite: Women enjoy a brief boon of a socially-established and -reinforced privilege that grants them supreme social value at a young age but then guarantees an inevitable decline. Women cannot out-perform biological predestination, and feminism is a social attempt to balance the scales and ensure their indefinite superiority. Having been given superiority at a y…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen21/06/19 07:36 PM
6

Why do you hate women? Do your parents know you're gay?
/r/PussyPassDenied21/06/19 04:29 PM
3

The paradigm of women being human beings while men existing as human doings is reflected in how women treat men; men are regarded as disposable, replaceable, and not having inherent value since there's always another and/or "better" man that can be monkey-branched to.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen19/06/19 09:31 PM
2

That's a good point, and I do have to say that my statement on unconditional/conditional love is based on personal experience (which is completely anecdotal). I'd say it's more a rule of thumb that is the aggregate norm, but there are so many exceptions to it (like you state). In general, I think it could be accurately stated that on average, women place their children as a priority above their spouse or significant other.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen19/06/19 08:52 PM
13

I don't think anything that has '.blogspot.com' in its URL should be taken with anything more than a grain of salt, but the conclusions and data cited in the article I linked are pulled directly from this study here: https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2003-05209-014 The full citation for the study is: Teachman, J. (2003). Premarital sex, premarital cohabitation and the risk of subsequent marital dissolution among women. Journal of Marriage and Family, 65(2), 444-455. if you want to dig into it and r…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen19/06/19 07:59 PM
9

These sorts of people always seem to think that there's some sort of transitive property of social value or value acquired by association. Fucking a 9 does not make one a 9, but since these people seemingly live at a right angle to reality they assume that it does.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen19/06/19 07:41 PM
5

This means a lot to me. I'm glad that I've been able to provide some insight and benefit the community in the same way that it benefits me. Thank you.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen19/06/19 07:38 PM
18

I can't find the study anymore, but there's an article that has the bar graph I think you're talking about: http://socialpathology.blogspot.com/2010/09/sexual-partner-divorce-risk.html Having ONE lifetime non-marital sexual partner puts a woman (statistically) at right around a 50% chance of divorce. And it only gets worse from there.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen19/06/19 07:23 PM
17

In essence she's hit terminal-state feminism. She's in a bind wherein she can attract top-20% men for sex, but they don't stay around and are either unable or unwilling to commit. In the profile, she's passive-aggressively lashing out and begging for sympathy at the same time. She desperately wants commitment from top-tier guys, but doesn't know how to secure that commitment. In her solipsistic little world, she's giving the guys she's attracted to everything they want, but they aren't committin…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen19/06/19 07:18 PM
85

Also "I'm never entering a relationship where I am of secondary or tertiary importance from the outset." A woman's love for her children is unconditional, while her love for her partner is always conditional. If a woman has any children, they will always be prioritized over you. This is ameliorated if these children happen to be yours genetically, but if not then you're screwed before you even start. Other shutdown lines: "I'm not interested." "She clearly can't make good choices or exercise goo…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen18/06/19 08:26 PM
4

This sort of scenario has happened to me a few times. Some girl will tell me out of the blue that she’s been raped or gotten out of an “abusive” relationship, when she and I basically have had no contact beyond small talk. Like, I’m not interested. It’s fucking weird that they’d tell me this so suddenly without our relationship being anything beyond a surface-level veneer of social niceties. Additionally, I’m not a fucking therapist, emotional tampon, or shoulder to cry on when we barely know ea…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen15/06/19 08:09 PM
3

And if she does go now she actually doesn’t give a flying iota of a fuck about the actual geography, the flora, the fauna, the history, the geology, or anything at all other than taking incessant pictures and being around people and doing things with people because OMG I’m such a people person. She has no substance and exists only to leech value off of people who have merit, knowledge, skills, and experience.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen13/06/19 06:20 PM
3

It’s anologous to an integer overflow. Her perceptions/expectations go so high that she crashes to zero and defaults to projection out of a state of cognitive dissonance.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen13/06/19 01:33 AM
6

“This one time in my early 20s, I fucked a 9 who was bored. As a result, my value is set at a ‘9’ level until I die since I can’t understand supply/demand, market value, or depreciation. My standards also only continue to increase and my value decreases, and as I become more and more jaded, bitter, and oppositional. With all of this in mind, I refuse to accept reality and will grow more and more angry and disillusioned until my inpossible fantasy becomes reality. I can only assume you’re now imp…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen13/06/19 01:29 AM
11

You know what I want? A bitter, baggage-laden, overweight harridan who brings nothing except unbridled self-loathing externalized at anyone who she happens to ensnare. Sincerely, Nobody
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen13/06/19 01:24 AM
35

It’s endlessly amusing that the same people who are so fervently: In favor of open borders In favor of unchecked (im)migration Against “nationalism” (which they think is a synonym for isolationism), Against “racism” (which someone they perceive only caucasians as being capable of) simultaneously lust over and fantasize about a border-walled tribalistic race-centric state that has had no actual innovation or advancement apart from literal space rock magic. In the same breath that they condemn rea…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen13/06/19 01:18 AM
8

White people made it worse Cite your source(s). The race of people (in your warped worldview) that fought themselves to end slavery did not “[make] it worse.”
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen13/06/19 01:12 AM
4

I don't have to imagine anything; every woman who currently exists can completely destroy the reputation and career of any man they choose by making a baseless and unfounded accusation, without a requirement for any evidence.
/r/MensRights12/06/19 11:18 PM
23

To put it even more succinctly: In aggregate, men are producers and investors, while women are consumers and depreciators.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen03/06/19 08:55 PM
20

All women's want relationships with good men and stable live . Sure, that's what they tell you. Their actions inevitably reveal the opposite.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen02/06/19 07:51 PM
11

I’d love to get her list of what she actually has to offer. It would likely just be a bulleted list of how similar she is to a man.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen27/05/19 11:54 PM
3

Yes, literally. What exactly is the issue you take with using correct English?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen27/05/19 04:12 AM
249

To repost my response to this scenario -and a comment /u/moorekom made- from a few months back: I picture the husband as kind of a mental gentle giant who’s always been fairly off the deep end of kinky and has the ability to seriously get shit done when push comes to shove due to some deep-set determination and maybe a healthy dose of controlled crazy, but is otherwise just a decent guy who’d rather have some stability that he can content himself with. So, he curtailed his insanity, started a fa…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen26/05/19 05:58 PM
5

Narcisissism =/= "not able to have empathy"
/r/TheRedPill26/05/19 05:34 AM
8

Feminism is more correctly “masculinism”; it is an ideology that embitters women against men because women are not men and seeks to make women as close to men in form and function as possible. Is it any shock that self-identifying as a ‘feminist’ elicits an immediate and emphatic dismissal? No man wants to even deal with a bitter harridan who seeks to challenge, stymie, and compete with him at every turn, let alone date or marry them.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen26/05/19 05:28 AM
7

Ah, well, as you enjoyed the spoils of feminism-created privilege; who are you to deny men the spoils of biology-created advantage? Could not have said it better. Incredibly insightful.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen24/05/19 09:21 PM
3

If you're too dumb to form a coherent sentence or can't be bothered to take pride in -at the bare minimum- what you write, then you're not worth my time.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen20/05/19 04:09 AM
3

In typical Thot fashion, she's completely unable to articulate or reason through her tenuous understanding of reality. What she means by "fuckboy" in the manner that she's drawn her cutesy chart is "Inversely likely to commit, relative to hotness". So, for example, a guy who's a '1' on the "Fuckboy" scale would be immediately willing to settle down and start a family and remain committed forever, while he is simultaneously a '9' or a '10' in "hotness". This is why that range would put that perso…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen17/05/19 04:27 PM
5

The 80-20 rule confirmed once more, just this time straight from the horse's mouth
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen17/05/19 04:23 PM
14

Without revealing too much about myself, I'd just like to chime in and confirm what you're stating. I'm related to one of these unicorns, and I can corroborate that they are in a league so completely separate from everything else that it's pretty much unbelievable.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen17/05/19 06:23 AM
3

Oh no, you absolutely do not get to shift your ridiculous goalposts from "Pairbonding is bro science" to "OxyContin levels vs a girl with several partners". Your original assertion was flagrant bullshit. Admit that and you can continue the conversation.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen16/05/19 08:41 PM
6

Pairbonding is bro science. Ah, yes, pair bonding is completely fictitious and in no way can positive correlation be drawn between the number of partners a female has and her likelihood for divorce. Complete "bro science", huh. Thanks for enlightening us all.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen16/05/19 08:24 PM
6

And they have less baggage, fewer bullshit hoops to jump through, no baby rabies, no list of expedited demands that they’re desperately trying to shoehorn in because their age is becoming evident and they feel like they need to keep up with the majority of their “friends,” and especially because there is seriously almost no competitive edge that female age 35 has over a female age 20 in the dating market.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen14/05/19 09:43 PM
4

Why you no make sentence correct? The hell is wrong with you? You trash can.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen12/05/19 06:04 AM
16

In no particular order, on the off chance she reads this: Old Unattractive Fat Single with children Toxic attitude Emotional instability Hypocritical
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen12/05/19 05:59 AM
4

Instead of making nebulous allusions to whatever you're trying to say, just come out and say it directly and plainly.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen12/05/19 05:58 AM
3

Which in her mind means she's essentially a Disney princess with no flaws who deserves the best the world has to offer
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen12/05/19 05:56 AM
7

I don't think she quite understands that she's completely embodied a masculine role, with all of the requisite financial, lifestyle, social trappings. And she's somehow shocked when men aren't interested in an ostensibly inferior version of themselves with a list of demands and emotional baggage? She made her "don't-need-no-man" "independent woman" bed, now she gets to lie in it.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen12/05/19 05:55 AM
8

As a man, I can't imagine -at all- any of the following: Getting rejected Getting ghosted Being ignored Not being rewarded for simply existing
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen12/05/19 05:49 AM
13

"I was there, but I didn't see anyone who looked like you in your pictures so I left."
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen12/05/19 05:16 AM
38

Why is this equation seemingly impossible for people to figure out? If you are: Over 30 Single WITH CHILDREN Fat The people that you are attracted to (or even the majority that you would "settle" for) are not attracted to you. Maybe try not being fat, old, and a single mother. Oh, you don't like the consequences of your (in)actions from earlier in your life? Too fucking bad. Get used to getting rejected, like every single man does.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen11/05/19 05:25 PM
3

...she literally says she's looking for a fuckboy in a world of gentlemen.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen10/05/19 04:41 AM
18

If she truly loves me, there's no need for marriage If she's truly committed to the relationship, there's no need for marriage If she fully intends to devote herself to the relationship and our future together, there's no need for marriage If she wants to have a family, there's no need for marriage If she decides to leave, then it's wonderful we never were married If she decides to get pissy or emotional, it's wonderful that there's no marriage that forces me to care or disallows me from withdra…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen10/05/19 01:31 AM
6

...or you have a variety of interests and enjoy discussing various issues and perspectives with people from both sides.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen07/05/19 11:42 PM
3

That’s not anything approaching an exclusively-RP term at all.
/r/TheRedPill07/05/19 02:39 PM
1

So then we’re already in the terminal stages of relationships and partnerships.
/r/TheRedPill04/05/19 04:59 PM
6

If all you notice about this is skin color then you're undoubtedly racist
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen04/05/19 04:47 AM
2

...well that’s some news I never expected to hear, let alone have it be true
/r/TheRedPill03/05/19 10:40 PM
0

Then men will simply not “date” at all and will only go for F-closing.
/r/TheRedPill03/05/19 10:07 PM
3

Can confirm. Essentially every friend I have that drinks consistently/regularly all look older than they are, while the ones that have a consistent quality diet and exercise regularly all look younger than they are.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen03/05/19 09:02 PM
3

That’s fair enough. I took it as a physical descriptor without any malice or insult. Derogation, sure, but towards the person’s actions and not specifically their C-section scarring.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen02/05/19 08:46 PM
1

Nobody said that it was.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen02/05/19 08:39 PM
8

Are you trying to be funny, or is this your poorly-structured attempt at a personal dig?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen01/05/19 04:22 PM
2

The absence of a signal is actually a signal in and of itself OutstandingMove.png
/r/TheRedPill30/04/19 07:57 PM
5

The few remaining men at the top Would you say that doctors are in this group?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen30/04/19 05:23 AM
2

That may be where I’m remembering it from. Thank you for the info.
/r/TheRedPill25/04/19 02:33 PM
25

No joke. It seems that the Chaddest of Chads keep a steady rotation of 1-3 or 4 playes and cycle them in and out anywhere from a few months to over a year. Given even a decade of almost full-time-job plating, even the UberChads are probably just on par with her current number (her actual number likely being double what she’s claiming).
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen25/04/19 01:29 AM
19

I'm paraphrasing here, and I can't remember where I came across it, but there's some wisdom in it: "When men talk there's an underlying threat of physicality and the potential for violence. It keeps the entire interaction civilized and defined. If you're talking to a man who wouldn't fight with you -or if they would they wouldn't pose any serious threat- then you're talking to someone that you cannot respect or fear on a fundamental level. Successful and worthwhile male interactions are predicat…
/r/TheRedPill24/04/19 10:13 PM
9

He seems pretty emotional, pretty impotent, and pretty stupid. Only losers have to threaten people on the internet because they can’t handle reality, and he seems hell-bent on shooting everyone because he can’t take care of his children.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen24/04/19 01:17 AM
5

You must be the only boy in town who thinks its just fine to kill others because you can’t take care of your progeny
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen24/04/19 01:15 AM
4

Reality is simple: If you have a child, that child and their wellbeing is your responsibility. If you can’t handle basic concepts like responsiblity you definitely shouldn’t have children.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen24/04/19 01:13 AM
81

I've made similar comparisons on other subs over differing issues, but the core principal is basically the same: Essentially, society's most productive, innovative, determined, skilled, intelligent, and educated demographic is being told that they are worthless and need to essentially just give up and die in a hole. They're told this tacitly by people who offer little to no value in comparison and who have little to no actual real-world acumen or efficacy, especially in the long run. What do you…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen18/04/19 07:31 AM
6

It exists in the same existential plane as unicorns
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen18/04/19 12:35 AM
11

There's a poignant statement made by someone here some time ago that applies to what you've said: "Women only win arguments because only idiots argue with women"
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen17/04/19 11:51 PM
4

Absolutely not. It’s so well understood that DNA fraud isn’t an issue in adoption that it doesn’t need to be restated at all.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen14/04/19 03:36 PM
3

Not his progeny, not his problem
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen14/04/19 03:32 PM
17

It's classical projection
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen13/04/19 06:06 PM
2

This works really well. You can even agree fully without amplifying and extend it into a full-on frame check and frame assertion. For example: "You're such an asshole!" "Well, yeah, everyone needs a hobby ;)" You've just agreed and rephrased/reframed in lieu of amplifying. I just don't know if that necessarily qualifies as an "amplification" per se.
/r/TheRedPill11/04/19 06:20 PM
4

That’s a huge non-sequitor.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen05/04/19 10:06 PM
16

I’d argue that dark triad types are typically amoral, albeit predatory. I don’t think morality can be argued in the case of narcissism, ASPD (i.e. psychopathy), or Machiavellianism since they’re all objectively unrelated to morality entirely and instead focused on self-interest.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen05/04/19 09:16 PM
2

The guy is an emotional wreck with a chip on his shoulder and no substance. Avoidance is probably best.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen04/04/19 01:00 AM
3

Stellar attitude you have.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen04/04/19 12:59 AM
8

I'd say it's even 6-6-6-6 at this point 6: Feet tall Inch dick Pack abs Figure income
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen02/04/19 07:49 PM
3

Oh look, another idiot who doesn't understand cause and effect. I’ll make it simple: Do you know why they make billions out of doing what they do? It’s because they know what they’re doing, and they know all of the data behind what they’re doing. The fact that they share statistical information while making billions shows you that they know what they’re talking about. Now go be a self-righteous little bitch somewhere else.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen26/03/19 04:56 PM
21

FWB is ideal, imo
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen22/03/19 12:06 AM
6

It’s a poor attempt at humor to attempt to balance out what she subconsciously knows is a ranty fingernails-on-a-chalkboard list of demands that will drive people away.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen17/03/19 03:23 PM
31

And her failure to secure a mate in her 20s, when her value was at its’ peak, is entirely her own fault. Likely it occurred because she was fucking outside of her commitment league and didn’t understand that the quality of man who you can get an NSA lay from is not the same quality or kind of man you can lock down for commitment. She’s is/was either less attractive or less intelligent than she assume(d)(s), and now she gets to reap the rewards of being a myopic moron.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen15/03/19 11:17 PM
3

Yeah, this is unreadable until you start introducing paragraph breaks
/r/TheRedPill15/03/19 11:04 PM
32

Are you telling me that the statement “I’m home as fuck” typed in broken and abbreviated English is not the height of literacy?
/r/TheRedPill15/03/19 10:23 PM
12

“Everyone I disagree with is weak, scared, or insecure.” No, you retarded bint, that’s not how reality works, and your shallow shaming tactics have no power here. Your inane cooption and bastardization of the axiom also belies your stupidity. If you can’t even distinguish the difference between insecurity and caution, weakness from discernment, and fear from risk-aversion, you have no merit in the discussion and deserve to be ignored and silenced since your worldview is so horribly stunted, stil…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen14/03/19 02:40 AM
1

I bet you that if a woman was owning a nightclub and said publicly "no short men", you guys would be all over saying its nonsense. Because it is. Not at all. Anyone can create any sort of private establishment that delineates their clientele however they want. If they choose to target a different market/demographic than ones that I am in, that’s absolutely fine. They’re allowed to do so, it doesn’t affect me because I and everyone else has free agency, and we can choose to take our business else…
/r/TheRedPill10/03/19 03:37 PM
1

To put it another way, I suppose: “Equity does not equal equality.” Fair treatment does not guarantee the same outcome.
/r/TheRedPill10/03/19 03:30 PM
30

...yet
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen07/03/19 05:28 PM
2

It’s the beautiful reality of Price’s Law. In any given organization, productivity increases linearly while inefficiency/waste increases exponentially.
/r/TheRedPill07/03/19 04:00 AM
2

I’m conflicted. I like your aggressive tone and direct message, which makes me want to upvote you, but I like you enough that I want to respect your wishes and follow through with your downvote edict. I don’t know what to do.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen06/03/19 01:10 AM
-1

Whenever you bring up the okcupid stats, there's usually some woman who will counter with - have you seen how gross the okcupid men are? They aren't a valid sample of the general population! This seems incredibly easy to counter: “Of course you’d say that. You’re part of a group of people who demonstrably have a severe selection bias as proven statistically and as shown by real-world study.” Additionally, the commenter on the OP is deliberately misleading with his wording. He specifies that the …
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen06/03/19 01:08 AM
11

This has been repeated ad nauseum, but it bears repeating here: Women are the gatekeepers of sex As gatekeepers, this makes them the arbiters of sexual selection Whatever women select for will increase in the population Thus, women as sexual selectors do not get to blame their partners for being shitty people when women themselves select for shitty people. Shitty broken people will always exist and be absolutely shitty and broken. If you select for shitty and broken people, you will get nothing …
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen04/03/19 08:35 AM
14

Freud wants to know your location
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen03/03/19 04:18 PM
47

Also the old "Islamophobe" and "Homophobe" Funny how Misandry is never alleged, though
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen01/03/19 09:22 PM
68

There’s nothing “misogynist” about it. Misogynist is an idiotic catch-all used by morons to try and manipulate emotional people in response to anyone saying anything that delineates based on gender.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen01/03/19 09:01 PM
2

[Shiny and Chrome Intensifies]
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen01/03/19 01:40 AM
8

If only they were as picky with their eating and exercise habits
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen01/03/19 01:39 AM
4

She looks like a demented rabbit And, based on her myopic “live for today...party tonight” she also lives in a leporine fashion (“fucking like rabbits”) and just does whatever she feels like as often as she can without regard for the consequences or her future. Thus the reason she’s obese and obssessed with consumption and inane frivolilties; she acts like the stupid game mammals that she resembles.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen01/03/19 01:37 AM
4

Her neck has rolls in it, and she has an early-stage FUPA. She is decidedly overweight, i.e fat.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen01/03/19 12:15 AM
9

As so succinctly stated above: You’re only as good as the guys you can get commitment from Men are the gatekeepers of commitment, women are the gatekeepers of sex. If you aren’t securing what the other party gatekeeps, you are the problem, not them. The cures are introspection and improvement.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen26/02/19 11:33 PM
11

Well-trimmed and well-maintained nails at a proper length that don't hinder function are a sign of both good health and good hygiene. Stupidly-long nails that extend beyond the end of the finger with more than a few millimeters of 'white' are indicative of a problem. They're going to break, they're going to crack, they're going to get in the way of literally everything you do with your hands. In short, they're completely pointless and actually pretty stupid. Hands look perfect without inane nail…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen25/02/19 08:22 PM
17

Haha wow didnt ur mom teach you to never ask that “Haha wow didn’t your mom care enough about you to teach you to spell and raise you to not be shallower than a wading pool”
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen22/02/19 10:40 PM
10

“Go getter” = Insufferable and self-obssessed surrogate male with an attitude who’s overly competitive and not at all suitable for companionship
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen22/02/19 10:36 PM
1

And the reason for this is simple: A woman’s love for her child(ren) is always unconditional, while her love for her SO is always conditional. All loves are conditional except the love for her children, thus everything is secondary and subordinate to this unconditional love.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen20/02/19 08:22 PM
3

If you're too dumb to understand why blatant shaming language is an insult, it's probably best that you don't stick around.
/r/TheRedPill13/02/19 05:26 PM
3

I've heard it said that women want the wedding, not the marriage.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen13/02/19 05:35 AM
1

There are more single, never-married, and childless men today of ALL races than at any point in (U.S.) history Having a large, unmarried population of bored young males is actually a pretty typical reason to start a massive war
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen13/02/19 01:34 AM
3

The Post-Wall Dialogue: Q: WAATGM!? A: “You didn’t ‘give’ me your 20s, why should I ‘give’ you my 30s/40s/50s?”
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen13/02/19 01:30 AM
14

Where are the men who want to meet the parents of the girl they are seeing? Why the everloving fuck would I care about your parents? I'm not dating them, I'm not going to be involved with them, and I couldn't care less about them. If we're dating, I'm interested in you. Not your cousins, not your siblings, not your parents, not your grandparents, just you. If you're actually quality enough for me to choose to marry you and start a family, then I'll do the cursory due diligence of pretending to c…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen11/02/19 08:04 PM
2

People seem to think ‘fetishization’ is somehow a volition of individual agency or personal worth. Being valued as or for a series of traits is neither dehumanizing or degrading.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen10/02/19 05:28 PM
2

You clearly don’t know what “deserve” means
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen10/02/19 05:07 PM
6

“The power to destroy a thing is the absolute control over it.“
/r/TheRedPill06/02/19 09:36 PM
5

There is no physiological difference between anger and arousal. Use this to your advantage.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen06/02/19 08:50 PM
7

I’ve heard it said before that: “The only reason that women win arguments is that only idiots argue with women” It’s a simple process: 1) Here are the facts 2) This is what the logic is 3) This is the conclusion 4) There is no further discussion. Either accept it or we are done. If she wants to argue it, that’s fine. She’s always going to attack only your conclusion, so make it simple for yourself: Make her explain exactly what is incorrect about the facts and the logic. She will be unable to do…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen06/02/19 08:49 PM
9

I'm really itching to locate the that mathematical response to that New York Craigslist post If you do, I’d love to read it
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen04/02/19 07:23 PM
4

You attract what you fear “I’m functionally retarded and have no idea what words mean or how to use them”
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen01/02/19 09:50 PM
10

The people that call themselves “intimidating” when they’re actually insufferable are the same ones who say things like “if that scares you” in lieu of if this doesn’t interest you. They’re so self-centered that they can’t understand why apathy is not hate and why rational cost-benefit analysis is not the same as emotionally-fraught disgust.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen01/02/19 09:44 PM
17

Some people actually are trying to argue this very thing in the comments. Their argument is basically “Truly nice people don’t exist, therefore everyone ‘acting’ nice is actually a manipulative abuser with an agenda”
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen31/01/19 03:44 AM
7

She's just a product of her fucked up environment. She's a product of her idiotic choices.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen29/01/19 11:35 PM
5

She writes under the name ‘The Plankton’, explaining that, like the plankton in the ocean, she is barely visible and ‘at the bottom of the food chain for love and relationships’. Well, yes. Stating reality of one’s own making is not grounds for sympathy. Get used to being single. Growing problem: Many over-45s describe themselves as 'invisible' to the opposite sex Existing problem: 80% of men are functionally invisible to 100% of women. Get over yourself and enjoy a taste of your own medicine. t…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen29/01/19 04:03 PM
11

what these gold digging whores don't realise is that billionaires didn't become billionaires by being stupid Also, and I'd like to state this without any aspersion; self-made billionaires are frequently relentless borderline-inhuman machines that exist as engines of obsessive and perpetual analysis and ruthless function. Trying out outmaneuver one of them is just pointless, and manipulation is also frequently an exercise in futility. You give them what they want otherwise they'll either steamrol…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen28/01/19 01:05 AM
1

It’s neither impossible or unreasonable. In fact, it’s highly probable.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen27/01/19 04:16 PM
10

The general amendment to that seems to be over 30
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen25/01/19 10:42 PM
4

And that’s the funny corner that they’ve painted themselves into. It’s like the old “If I’m going to feel like shit no matter what, I’d rather be wealthy and feel like shit than poor and feel like shit.” Men realize they can’t win, so they prioritize self-investment and don’t allow a woman to dictate what they do. If it doesn’t work out, it wouldn’t have worked out anyway, but at least they’ll still be wealthy, independent, and stable. Don’t like it? Tough titties, move on and find another who i…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen25/01/19 10:32 PM
17

I’d like to piggyback on your main post to state an epiphany I just had: Men, as the gatekeepers of commitment, get to decide and act on whatever criteria they want to filter their commitment through. This especially applies to women, who, as the gatekeepers of sex, must absolutely have their track record of sex as a gatekeeper of sex taken into account as judged by a gatekeeper of commitment prior to them deciding to engage in commitment. Women want to simultaneously be the sole arbiters of the…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen25/01/19 01:41 AM
26

“The only reason that women win arguments is that only idiots argue with women”
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen20/01/19 04:13 PM
3

Absolutely. Discrimination/discernment is a basic human function that everyone does. Villifying it is just stupid.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen18/01/19 10:10 PM
5

I’d even amend it to not include ‘racism’ or ‘prejudice’ at all. Both terms have negative connotations that may or may not be applicable. It is more correctly selective distinction and discriminatory judgement based on personal preference and experience. I, personally, am not attracted to people of certain types. I am absolutely allowed to discriminate (i.e. make judgemental discernment and distinction) and choose to invest in people that I deem worthy of myself as determined by my values. This …
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen18/01/19 09:29 PM
4

Some cucks that wifed these post wall and post epihany phase sluts up even brag about their wifes high n-count. They think that their partner’s past amount of sexual activity is a sort of hallmark of their own value and/or sexual prowess. “She fucked 80 guys before she met me, and I’m the one that got her to commit. I’m so good attractivity-wise and/or sexually that she chose to stay with me.”
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen17/01/19 03:45 AM
2

What a retarded amount of disingenuity. The OP knows she’s not an “asshole” already, but she has negative feelings of her own making and wants to be sympathized with and validated out of the hole she dug. Her BF is not an “asshole” for having immutable standards and preferences, and she’s not an “asshole” for engaging in sluttery from a young age for years on end. She’s a slut and he’s a man of standards. Neither side is an “asshole”, but in typical female shaming fashion she frames it as “Who i…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen16/01/19 07:26 PM
32

I respect any man who can heal a heart he didn’t break and raise a child he didn’t make Your “respect”, just like you, has no value and does not matter. Edit: In fact, your “respect” is an actual devaluation of whatever you direct it at. You are a poison, and you taint whatever you touch.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen15/01/19 11:05 PM
-1

Directly, no, there’s nothing wrong at all. Indirectly, there’s so much that is absolutely wrong.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen13/01/19 05:16 PM
6

If you think you can handle me If you clearly can’t even “handle” yourself, why would anyone want to handle you?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen11/01/19 10:21 PM
3

“I’m a damsel in distress in the most unrealistic and idiotic way possible, please help.” Definitely a scam, or at the very least she’s actually in-country but has concocted the most idiotic farce to wean money from fools.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen11/01/19 01:49 AM
4

It's apparently not allowed to complain about dating as a woman Nobody said you can't complain. You're absolutely allowed to complain. You're also not given an automatic exemption from criticism when you complain about things that are completely fixable and ultimately are a non-issue. "I'm not attracting the people I'm attracted to" - Stop whining on the internet, figure out what the people you're attracted to are attracted to, and do your damnedest to become or be like that if it's what you wan…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen10/01/19 12:16 AM
11

Or the “requirements” never change, and the women holding them get more and more bitter all the while blaming “men” for not producing/being/making her mental fairy tale a reality.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen09/01/19 02:29 AM
7

"Why isn't your argument "Men need to be held responsible for being shitty partners?" Why is the onus on women? Women select for sexual reproduction. This is basic biology. If women select for certain traits, those traits are effectively “rewarded” and will not only continue to exist but will also spread. Shitty people will always exist. The point is that the one group of people who can disincentivize shittiness to the point that it suffers extinction choose not to do so. Assholes of course are …
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen05/01/19 03:45 PM
2

Well put.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen03/01/19 09:22 PM
29

Age: 18
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen02/01/19 09:06 PM
4

Explain clearly and concisely how law-abiding men can and do trap women into paying for the man's mistakes, both financially and emotionally, for close to two decades.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen31/12/18 10:26 PM
39

I've heard it said that women want the wedding, just not the marriage. They want the ultimate validation of their worth as per the FSM, which would be being worthy of "forever" commitment as determined by a wedding, but they don't want the long-term responsibilities and work that goes into marriage. They want all of the reward and none of the responsibility. Thus, they want the wedding but not the marriage.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen31/12/18 06:50 PM
6

...but I'm offended by reality, and I need to cry to some authority figure about my feelings
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen30/12/18 11:23 PM
21

If semen was currency, she’d have her own bank
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen25/12/18 02:05 AM
2

Social circles and connections
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen24/12/18 11:30 PM
3

0 debt 0 tattoos 0 previous sexual partners 0% overweight/obese/unhealthy
/r/MGTOW23/12/18 08:25 AM
1

5’14” checking in
/r/MGTOW23/12/18 08:12 AM
1

Any younger than that and it must be a complete minefield to try and tiptoe through to date anymore. It is. Thank you for the condolences, though.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen23/12/18 08:08 AM
22

The irony of these services (and online dating in general) is that: People (men) who are valuable (i.e. assertive, ambitious, charismatic, confident, experienced, established, successful, sexy) have no need for these services since their real-life options abound, and even if they don't, these men by dint of the very characteristics that make them valuable can make and foster options at any time. This is to say that the people who users of online dating services desire are vanishingly unlikely to…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen19/12/18 08:55 PM
15

Modern dating is just deceit and judgment. Ironic complaint from a person (The OP) who has been treated with honesty by the provider of the services they sought, and who does nothing but judge others.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen19/12/18 08:50 PM
40

yeah but wouldnt you rather date a stunning/hot 32 year old versus an average 21 year old Nope. Too many issues with post-30 women for it to be worthwhile. If you can "get" a stunningly hot 32-year old, you can "get" a hot 21-year old.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen19/12/18 06:55 PM
9

Whom hast rendered ill will unto thine self?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen19/12/18 02:33 AM
8

Alternatively, ask him how long he's been his "best friend's" pimp and how he makes a profit.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen19/12/18 12:52 AM
37

but this is a nonsense incel talking point. Talk about meaningless buzzword vomit. If you’re looking for people who make it into their thirties without ever having a sex life, Show us specifically where the OP states that people who have sex before they’re 30 are worthless. I’ll help you out, even: You can’t, because he didn’t.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen17/12/18 11:42 PM
1

his problem is the constant nagging, attacks, break-downs that his girlfriend constantly is doing because other women are constantly approaching him. Allowing others to walk over you and treat you like trash is not "alpha". I'm sorry that you're confused about this.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen17/12/18 10:56 PM
5

So, not alpha. Socially valued but personally impotent/inept is not "alpha".
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen17/12/18 09:39 PM
2

Not only is he ridiculously naive, he also is just fucking stupid as evidenced by him spelling “onus” as “ownus”. Spell checking functions are built into every modern piece of technology. If you not only can’t spell but can’t even fucking figure put basic word processing, you’re beyond retarded.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen16/12/18 11:51 PM
3

You aren’t addressing my argument that people do not understand what marriage is “People do not understand or conform to my personal definition of marrriage or what I think a legal union between partners should encompass and entail” is not an argument.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen16/12/18 11:48 PM
17

Deus Vult
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen16/12/18 05:53 PM
5

Her nose is disproportionate as hell. It’s double the length of a normal nose.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen16/12/18 04:56 PM
22

I much rather marry a sex worker than a CC rider There is no difference. “I’d rather have a glass of water than some dihydrogen monoxide”
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen16/12/18 03:54 AM
3

The more others know about you, the less power you have and the more power they have over you. I’ve adopted a strict policy of being authoritative, distanced, firm, and direct, while also being friendly and cordial without revealing any personal information or explaining anything. Professional relationships and personal relationships are clearly separate. I’ve found that this reinforces authority and fosters respect and loyalty, all while keeping others moderately open and on good terms and main…
/r/TheRedPill13/12/18 01:47 AM
3

“Any man who must say ‘I am the king!’ is no true king.” Tywin Lannister
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen13/12/18 01:04 AM
12

...and why can she not be fucked to form a proper sentence? If someone can’t even take pride in their writing, that’s usually indicative of other issues.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen13/12/18 01:03 AM
8

I can't respect a man that isn't ambitious. Amusingly, she's created a catch-22 of failure. An ambitious man wouldn't be interested in her, because he could do better. As such, he will do better, and she'll be ignored. Thus, the only people who meet her criteria, who she can respect, will not be a part of her life and will not care about her. She will not care about or for people who do choose to be with her, since that very choice belies their lack of standards, lack of ambition, and lack of va…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen12/12/18 05:25 PM
2

Desperation is a hell of a drug
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen11/12/18 07:47 PM
10

I am as much a degenerate hater of women as the rest of you You don't speak for the community, and you especially do not get to tacitly assert that everyone here hates women just because you happen to hate women. (valid reasons, non valid one, doesn't matter) It does matter. Don't project your insane worldview onto others and work backwards to try and legitimize it by falsely ascribing "validity" to your viewpoints from an assumed position of superiority. I am no white Knight, after my two faile…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen10/12/18 07:38 PM
8

I agree. Also, just so you know, it’s “clinch” and not “clench.”
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen10/12/18 07:09 PM
2

Or, more aptly, "undisclosed"
/r/TheRedPill10/12/18 05:04 AM
4

I'm not advocating "ghosting"; I'm stating that ending a relationship on your own terms without granting the other party "closure" is an excellent tactic that reinforces personal value.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen10/12/18 04:55 AM
21

...with tattoos, a time debt to her past self, a desperation for a bailout, a chip on her shoulder against the world, and a complex of self-righteous victimhood. She is beyond valueless.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen09/12/18 04:51 PM
7

It’s basic tactics that most people can’t seem to understand or implement. Never clarify, always confuse. Never explain why, just say what. And, as an extension: never grant the boon of “closure.”
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen09/12/18 04:48 PM
-10

Found the self-righteous idiot
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen09/12/18 04:44 PM
6

This, I think, is the likely scenario.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/12/18 07:36 PM
3

Oh no, someone I’ve never met and who doesn’t matter in the slightest can block me. Hold me, I don’t know what to do.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen07/12/18 11:44 PM
4

Society has effectively disincentivized the one institution that is necessary both for society’s current existence and future propagation of society itself: the family unit.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen07/12/18 11:36 PM
122

It’s just such a fucking funny scenario. I picture the husband as kind of a mental gentle giant who’s always been fairly off the deep end of kinky and has the ability to seriously get shit done when push comes to shove due to some deep-set determination and maybe a healthy dose of controlled crazy, but is otherwise just a decent guy who’d rather have some stability that he can content himself with. So, he curtailed his insanity, started a family, and never unchained the internal lion. Then along…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen07/12/18 10:28 PM
42

0 Tattoos 0 Debt 0 previous sexual partners
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen07/12/18 09:15 PM
9

Whorehousing?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen07/12/18 07:16 PM
6

*Lmao-az
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen07/12/18 01:12 AM
9

There is no benefit to marriage in today’s world.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen07/12/18 12:26 AM
14

A female doctor's best hope, if they aren't a supermodel (or shit, even a normal model), is to date and marry another doctor. They effectively educate themselves out of the dating market.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen06/12/18 08:41 PM
23

Dad was likely authoritarian, abusive, distant, and harsh. He likely didn’t know how to raise a girl properly. She grew up with a warped worldview when it comes to functioning and healthy relationships, especially with her father and the opposite sex. Her tumultuous upbringing fostered a host of daddy issues compounded by an improperly calibrated metric for viable partnership. She resultingly engages in relationships with bad-boy masculine figures, maybe also as an act of rebellion against her s…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen06/12/18 03:43 AM
58

Notice also this reprehensible shaming language of: “These men fear what they cannot control.” No, you colossal dumbfuck, people rightly avoid that which they cannot predict and that which is also predicated towards their ruination at the drop of a hat for any perceived faux pas. It’s not “fear”, it’s calculated cost/benefit analysis. Don’t project your inferior emotions into an issue in an attempt to emotionally discredit those you disagree with.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen05/12/18 01:34 AM
5

It's a shit test that imparts plausible deniability.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen03/12/18 06:28 PM
70

Ok, so if it's so terrible now, literally nothing is stopping her from just leaving the relationship. She isn't a slave, she isn't a captive, she has free will and agency yet she chooses to forego all semblance of individual agency. She clearly doesn't enjoy it, she isn't valued, and yet she can't help herself. It's an all-you-can-eat buffet of idiocy and emotion, and she's a glutton. Sounds like the blue-pilled nice guy lucked out and doesn't have to deal with someone who was mentally broken th…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen02/12/18 08:15 PM
27

Now that’s some delicious comeuppance.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen02/12/18 07:51 PM
37

You can tell by looking at her just how low-quality her genetic stock is. She evidences low-class/poor quality facial features, body composition, complexion, and demeanor. God-awful tattoos too. She looks like every other foul-mouthed white trash trailer-park mother who dejectedly tows her troop of unwanted and unloved children around, who glowers in line as her children run rampant around the store, who screams at them and hits them in lieu of any kind of quality parenting or discipline, who is…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen02/12/18 05:06 PM
23

A debt-free virgin without tattoos, who’s willing and able to stay with and support her spouse while constantly bettering herself and supporting him through thick and through thin. Who’s also willing and able to commit to a complementary spousal role. This requires her intelligence, dedication, discipline, commitment, loyalty, discernment, good judgement and selection, care, kindness, grace, and beauty. If she has all of these, she will have no problem legitimately finding and securing a “good m…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen02/12/18 04:26 PM
6

It gets even better when you factor in the 6-figure income (we’ll say 5%, even though the male/female destribution would cut that down) and 6-pack abs (we’ll generously say that you have to have the other three ‘sixes’ for this to count, and we’ll peg it arbitrarily at a generous 10%). 0.003% of the population meets the four sixes. I’d say that’s an excellent metric for top-tier male value.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen30/11/18 04:14 PM
12

unless you are a top-tier male What are the defining characteristics of a top-tier male?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen29/11/18 09:00 PM
17

You mean a place where men have to invest time, energy, discipline, willpower, and dedication? A place where men who evidence long-lasting quality and the traits thereof? Where men dedicate themselves to looking and performing excellently, and in doing so reveal excellent relationship viability? I can’t believe it’s not butter.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen29/11/18 04:24 AM
18

Women’s studies fall under two genres: Fantasy Drama
/r/TheRedPill20/11/18 09:30 PM
34

Wow. “We women are incapable of getting what we want. We can’t bargain, we can’t even explicitly trade, all we can hope to do is obtain what we want through duplicitous methods. People know what we’re doing, now, so instead of improving or functioning like a fucking adult we need to implement a codified legal system wherein those who don’t give us what we feel we’re entitled to (simply by dint of our existence) should be legally punished and/or forced to give us what we deserve.” No, you turbo-b…
/r/TheRedPill20/11/18 05:23 PM
5

“I know what I’m worth” or “I know what I deserve”
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen20/11/18 05:11 PM
8

Somebody doesn’t understand how reality works.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen20/11/18 05:09 PM
11

He who is least invested in a relationship has the most power in that relationship
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen20/11/18 05:05 PM
3

I'm deeply sorry for your loss
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen20/11/18 04:46 AM
3

That's an option too. Either way, I agree that the most prudent method of handling it is to simply cut contact and move on.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen19/11/18 07:40 PM
3

It's a BuzzFeed video, nothing of substance was missed.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen19/11/18 05:47 PM
3

They look beautiful to me. More power to you, feel free to take all of them that you can off our hands.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen19/11/18 05:47 PM
1

Excellent points, and what a well-articulated series of rebuttals. Stellar dialogue, please contribute more.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen19/11/18 05:41 PM
48

Had something similar happen lately. Asked a girl out on a brief coffee date. She said “lol /u/Cavannah I see you as a brother”, so I broke off all contact immediately and moved on. I couldn’t care less, but she’s now trying to make a point of throwing up IOIs. My guess is that it’s either a hard-to-get flirting strategy or she can’t handle the tacit mutual rejection. Maybe both. It doesn’t matter; she had her chance and rejected it. No game-playing is going to occur this early.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen19/11/18 05:09 AM
2

“Love” is synonymous with “commitment” to them. If you “love” a woman, you are committed to her. This commitment entails your financial support and sacrifice. This is because men are the gatekeepers of commitment in relationships.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen16/11/18 11:03 PM
24

In a vacuum, an ultimatum is the truest assertion of personal agency and standards. It’s an absolute assertion of values, boundaries, and expectations. All of these fundamentally establish and assert personal power, because they can be backed by both action and choice. Now, if someone is attempting to establish power by setting out ultimatums that they cannot back up, stick to, or enforce, then yes that is a sign of being powerless. However, if someone has power, ultimatums actually reinforce th…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen15/11/18 06:40 PM
4

Even better, it’s completely obvious not only why she has this double standard but also why she feels the need to lash out at someone because they judged a female friend on her sexual past. ...it’s become necessary for women to legitimize every woman’s sexual past for fear that their own might disqualify her for a man’s commitment. ...to women, only women should ever have control over Hypergamy and sexual selection. And in a feminine-primary social order a man telling another man that he should …
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen15/11/18 03:07 PM
12

I was being "a judgmental asshole" and "throwing the relationship away" This one was pretty good. Like, yes, you daft bint, I judged her, found her lacking through her lies and sordid past, and decided to cast her off before she did some serious damage and hid it from me, likely to my personal ruination or harm. You not liking me doesn’t make me an “asshole,” in fact accosting someone in public over your friend’s failings makes you the asshole. You also can’t “throw away” something that apparent…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen15/11/18 01:42 AM
12

Too many guys are intimidated by strong women. Another stellar example of emotional idiots conflating "insufferable" with "intimidating." No, you aren't "intimidating." You're annoying, obnoxious, pretentious, emotional, demanding, and intractable. You're quite actually insufferable, and the fact that you don't understand that speaks volumes about why you actually are single.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen13/11/18 05:57 AM
3

No, this is not narcissism. Somebody you’re in a relationship with goes to painstaking efforts to document and share everything you two do, but they carefully omit you from everything they record and make a point of never mentioning you? Something is not right, and worthy of concern. A healthy amount of self-respect and vested interest in one’s own needs and wants is so vastly different from narcisissm, which is an unhealthy amount of obsessive behavior focused entirely on one’s self. The OP evi…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen11/11/18 05:41 PM
2

Color me shocked that trashy people are incapable of not engaging in risky and stupid behavior, and obsess over stupid and risky things.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen11/11/18 05:31 PM
5

I spy with my little eye a flabby fold of fat hanging out from under that bra. Like, it’s just dripping out of her armpit practically. Not fooled.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen09/11/18 11:37 PM
2

But, truly, who facilitates and allows this male behavior to have results? If it didn’t work, guys wouldn’t do it. The problem is that the established social institutions that used to curtail this behavior to some degree and reward those who adhered to them, such as marriage and courtship, have been bastardized and destroyed. Their intrinsic values and rewards have been gutted.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen09/11/18 11:32 PM
3

Good summation, people can't seem to "get" the difference between being outright weird and simply displaying passive yet dominant eye contact. Also, it is "...piques your interest", not "...peaks your interest."
/r/TheRedPill08/11/18 05:57 PM
6

I’m sorry that your fragile ego can’t take lighthearted ribbing or light discussion
/r/TheRedPill06/11/18 04:01 AM
0

Dominance is apparently a crime now, eh
/r/TheRedPill06/11/18 01:57 AM
3

Critical Hit
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen01/11/18 10:28 PM
18

Well, yes. "It’s very difficult for women to cope with [female bullying] because they don’t have any real recourse....female bullying can be unbelievably vicious. It usually takes the shape of reputation destruction, innuendo and gossip." (Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7QRQjrsFnR4&t=46m47s) Studies on anti-social behavior show that men often resort to outright violence while women [gravitate towards] reputation destruction, innuendo and gossip. (via The Washington Times, quoting Jordan…
/r/MensRights01/11/18 02:45 AM
23

And the moral, I think, is to never settle for less than you want. Somebody else wants to dictate your relationship with them? No, thank you. If I'm not getting what I want out of this, I'm not hanging around for it. If they aren't attracted to you, don't care about/for you, and/or aren't interested for whatever reason, the sagest thing to do is to move on and find someone who does value and want you. Ultimately, LJBF is a contrived exploitation of social mores. The best way I think you could de…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen31/10/18 04:22 PM
15

An emotionally broken person who doesn’t know how to handle feelings or exercise even a semblance of willpower or discipline to control whatever wave of dopamine washes over them. Shocking.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen30/10/18 12:27 AM
5

Is reverse yellow fever a thing?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen29/10/18 02:18 AM
2

She doesn’t even know what she wants. If she did, she wouldn’t be using “cute” words like “flourish” completely improperly. She wants to be “grown” with love? She’s already a grown person. Congrats, OP, you dodged an idiot.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen24/10/18 04:49 PM
100

Every new statement or paragraph contradicts the previous. “I want everything that I don’t have, but I’m happy with where I am.” “I’m unhappy with what I have.” “I only have myself, but I completely love myself.” “I’m intelligent and independent.” “I can’t get over my total emotional dependency on this person.” It’s as if cognitive dissonance became personified. Make no mistake here: this person has painted themself into an emotional corner with the brush of feelings and dependency. She’s now de…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen23/10/18 05:12 PM
3

I love the way you put it. In effect, there’s incredibly shoddy investment strategy, as it were. They don’t do their due diligence, their market research, their survey of the market or market trends. They don’t do anything to invest in a potential success, they only care about getting something that is already a success. It’s as if WallStreetBets’ strategy of “buy high and sell low” became personified. They are chronically chasing and lusting after the market successes that are already high-valu…
/r/TheRedPill21/10/18 05:06 PM
8

Women are easy to understand. Simply aggregate gender traits to understand what and why. Only a simpleton would even begin to claim that women can’t be understood. Their motivations are clear, their goals are clear, their methodology is clear, their criteria are clear, all that you have to truly give weight to is their actions and what they mean. The likes of /r/TRP have had this case cracked for years, and successful men and women have understood women since time immemorial.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen21/10/18 04:38 PM
7

This is the reason that land ownership should determine voting eligibility.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen21/10/18 04:32 PM
2

Condescending pity coupled with derisive dismissal and unrelenting apathy does wonders.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen19/10/18 12:51 AM
3

Results are still pending, "bro". I'll let you know as soon as we hit on something.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen09/10/18 10:05 PM
4

Guess we better analyze it to prove the trope.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen09/10/18 07:30 PM
5

How will we know that unless we analyze them?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen09/10/18 05:28 PM
1

Or unattractive
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen03/10/18 01:54 AM
7

Your very own independent chubby non-escorting angel I’d give you a comma to use, but you’d probably eat it too Aim: long term relationship It probably won’t be too long, given how obese you are. Also, relationships with you are measured by width, not length. Visited more than 50 countries Nobody cares. High IQ, high class Obviously not x2 Here to go on dates I bet you want to be wined and dined. I bet you want food. And I bet you don’t want to pay for it. Let’s skip small talk I doubt that ther…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen03/10/18 01:51 AM
9

“Facebook says it’s 154”
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen03/10/18 01:42 AM
14

More than likely this idiot just made up his “friend” to support his bullshit “facts”
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen03/10/18 12:09 AM
2

Ahhhh its an ego thing ;) gotcha "I will not be in a relationship where I come second. If you can't handle that, and can't handle a simple discussion without being rude, then you aren't worth my time. You will talk to me like an adult, without using shaming language, or you will not talk to me at all."
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen26/09/18 10:48 PM
7

“I’m contemplating putting my kid up for adoption.” "Feel free to contact me then"
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen26/09/18 10:43 PM
8

6.0000001 figures
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen23/09/18 05:24 AM
59

“If you can’t meet your own standards, why would someone who does meet them want you?”
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen23/09/18 05:24 AM
11

Probably the most succinct: "No"
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen22/09/18 07:12 PM
2

“Any flavor of tap water your heart desires”
/r/TheRedPill15/09/18 08:37 PM
8

Looking for an LTR through a hookup service is like trying to get a week’s worth of groceries at Taco Bell because you think “they both sell food”.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen15/09/18 01:07 AM
16

illrterate Fucking lol, THOTs keep out-THOTting themselves Bitching about not finding literal perfection Why would the perfect man want your sub-par, complainy self? Everything in life is a compromise. Pick someone who is an acceptable level of all of the above and learn to love him. You’re chasing an ideal that doesn’t exist. It is absolutely doable to find a guy who is: Handsome Intelligent Committed Responsible Educated Successful and of course Literate - Really? Literacy is an option? How is…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen14/09/18 09:03 PM
3

Purple Pill Discussion, I’d assume
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen14/09/18 09:02 PM
26

Also love metal. Also have no tattoos. Uncertain what inferences are being drawn here about our type.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen13/09/18 03:22 AM
7

Yes. The pertinent part is how it relates to the person I responded to. "Non-monogamy saves monogamy in the same way that fucking saves virginity"
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen12/09/18 06:25 PM
47

"Fighting for peace is like fucking for virginity" George Carlin
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen12/09/18 04:17 PM
2

As long as the career isn’t something that’s a red flag (e.g. prostitute, stripper, etc.), all that matter is “Do you have a career?”, not what the career is.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen12/09/18 12:27 AM
11

To quote another user (I forget if it was here or TRP, I’ll try and find it): Marriage is the only legal contract in existence that permits a person to violate contractual terms and then subsequently penalize the party who faithfully upheld said terms, with no legal or financial (even social, it seems) repercussions for the violator.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen10/09/18 08:54 PM
67

but what ever happened to romantic gestures and bold moves? Insufferably entitled women who came to expect things above and beyond the norm as the norm itself. Also idiotic women who cry foul and 'harassment' at every turn. What ever happened to a guy going after a girl until she agreed to give him a chance? You're right. There is no #metoo "movement". Career-ending workplace harassment allegations made without proof don't exist. The court of public opinion is completely ambivalent towards men w…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen09/09/18 05:18 AM
40

This guy is a servile and acquiescent doormat. And he's shocked that he was so pussy-whipped that he let someone walk all over him and control every facet of his existence in her presence? He didn't even have the good graces to establish boundaries. First date at someone's house? Hell no. Picking up cigarettes for someone on a first date? Absolutely not. Being lectured to about personal desires and expectations? Fuck. No. Allowing somebody to order you to buy food and drinks for them, allowing t…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/09/18 04:56 PM
2

It seems like all guys in their 20s only want fwb. And I'm really tired of it. So what makes you worth more than a FWB relationship?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/09/18 12:44 AM
3

Let's talk dating these days "Let me lecture you about why I am special, single, and totally deserve a good man" [I'm happy for all you married people] No, you are not. You are madly jealous. You ask me to Netflix & chill; byeeeee You aren't as funny as you think you are Let's hang out ---> "OK, and do what?" ---> I don't know, watch a movie ---> "uh, no" Why are you entertaining offers from absolutely trash-tier suitors? The fact that you're this distraught over them, to the point that they've …
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/09/18 12:37 AM
4

He for sure invented time and space, but idk about light
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen07/09/18 10:29 PM
5

You can’t abort 15-year olds, they’re slightly past the allowable trimester
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen07/09/18 01:32 AM
4

“Mediocre and Virtually Powerless” “Moribund, Violent, Pointless” “Mother’s Vicious Punching-bag” “Mentally Vestigal Person” Good luck to this young man
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen07/09/18 01:31 AM
4

“You aren’t entitled to sex” “I’m entitled to your time, attention, resources, and value”
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen07/09/18 01:26 AM
5

Voluntarily entering the school of hard knocks and refusing to learn anything is like a soft Darwin award
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen07/09/18 01:25 AM
5

Actually, it’s even better than that. It’s “Mexicans and white”, not plural. There is exactly one “white” out there that she will accept.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen07/09/18 01:24 AM
27

A good wine is something that's been refined, aged, treated with care and has had major time invested in it. Kind of like the men she's looking for. Growing Grapes: Grape plants are planted and raised to maturity through careful pruning and agricultural care, with the right soils being chosen as fertile ground for planting. They're carefully monitored and tended to. Then, when it comes time to harvest the grapes after a full season of growing, they choicest are plucked from the vine. These are t…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen07/09/18 12:26 AM
12

My son comes first This means -in the dating market- that suitors will not come to you. You will only get the desperate dregs who have no other options. Congratulations, you have painted yourself into a corner and removed yourself from the market.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen06/09/18 06:15 PM
19

“If you don’t do the work, you won’t get paid and won’t have a job. That’s not harassment: that is called emoloyment. Now do you want to work or do you want to leave? Think hard about it, because if you leave you aren’t coming back.”
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen05/09/18 02:50 AM
14

Thus the advice: "Be dangerous. Be congenial, but be a threat."
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen05/09/18 12:38 AM
8

If you're working 80 hours a week and are exhausted, conceiving a child doesn't necessarily happen as easily as you might think. I know, and I am not the only one to have this problem. For women in finance, the heavy workload, the high stress and the lack of sleep not only make it difficult to find a partner, but are a recipe for hormonal imbalance and infertility. You don't get to complain about choices that you made when you can still change them. The longer I work in banking, the more that I …
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen05/09/18 12:26 AM
1

Men pay for sex because male demand outstrips female supply. It’s a function of economy, not libido. Furthermore, this supply/demand disparity is not a resultant from libido, it is a function of females by necessity being more choosy and having the marketplace value to enable that choosiness. This is what the 80/20 rule covers.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen04/09/18 08:29 PM
3

Attractiveness is a function of how close they are to 125lb and 21 years old.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen03/09/18 02:53 AM
66

This is always a fun corollary that flies over the heads of THOTs who have been patrolled. If the breaking of commitment doesn't matter (i.e. is a "small" thing), then the commitment likewise doesn't matter (i.e. is a "small" thing).
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen03/09/18 12:25 AM
8

Big Doubt
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen03/09/18 12:23 AM
3

Is this an attempt at a meme?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen30/08/18 04:54 AM
6

You peaked at 5-6%? This is 6.75%, as confirmed via DEXA scan. And you were more lean than that? Unless you were on sizeable amounts of diuretics and AAS, you were nowhere near that.
/r/TheRedPill28/08/18 03:36 AM
4

Pollination is the new trend
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen28/08/18 03:13 AM
8

The delusional outcry about this is plainly idiotic. Women are the sexual selectors. The sexual market is female-centric, as male supply is more abundant than female demand, and conversely female supply is less abundant than male demand. Thus, it is the female’s domain to determine the market’s characteristics. Their absolute control over the market is being acknowledged and supported by the line in the OP. In fact, nothing is more empowering than being a lady. A lady is elegant, measured, refin…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen28/08/18 03:01 AM
10

Sure. That wasn't his instinctual response though, and with good reason.
/r/TheRedPill24/08/18 10:11 PM
5

MMA (Mixed Martial Arts) involves striking and grappling. What are you trying to say?
/r/TheRedPill24/08/18 09:02 PM
6

Mommy-to-be next month I had to fix your sentence so that it actually had a semblance of proper structure. If you're too stupid to know how to write a sentence and string words together, then you're not worth anyone's time. Or, if you are smart enough to know, but you're too lazy to do so or just don't take pride in what you do, why the the everloving hell would anyone care to try and raise children with someone who's either lazy, stupid, or doesn't take pride in what they do? Sick of fake love …
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen24/08/18 02:56 PM
5

Maybe, and I mean MAYBE a 6 out of 10.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen24/08/18 04:07 AM
3

We either have Sarin gas for our men afield, or hormones for children back home because they were the “wrong” gender and feel some type of way. Chemical either way.
/r/TheRedPill24/08/18 02:35 AM
2

I have shit myself and am now convinced that I am the most attractive man alive. Don’t be a Doubting Thomas and rain on my parade.
/r/TheRedPill24/08/18 02:33 AM
34

Unwilling, unable, and unworthy
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen19/08/18 04:50 AM
3

The cost of consistent bloodwork, proper diet, ancillaries (aromatase inhibitors, PCT drugs for when/if you come off, anti-acne drugs such as Accutane, the likes of Cabergoline for prolactin regulation, hCG if you want to keep HPTA function, various peptides and/or orals if your joints start acting up, etc), and the necessary pharmaceutical-grade compounds for whatever your goal is (unless you go underground lab or make your own), can rack up a steep bill quickly if you aren't prepared. Not to m…
/r/TheRedPill23/07/18 02:53 AM
1

Tom Ford Tobacco Vanille 10/10 if you’re willing to foot the bill
/r/TheRedPill19/07/18 11:22 PM
1

She might be 19? I honestly don’t know what the reason could be.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen19/07/18 11:16 PM
2

...did you mean 'to rear'?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen18/07/18 06:09 PM
3

Apparently insulting, denigrating, and shaming people makes them attracted to you and willing to do anything for you including deeply loving you forever.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen17/07/18 04:35 PM
6

White guys say that about white women I've never heard any white guy complain about specifically white women. I've heard specific white guys complain about 'women' in general, but that's typically because these specific guys keep the company of and exclusively prefer certain demographics of women that are unstable, emotional, shallow, and mentally broken.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen15/07/18 06:17 PM
10

if someone else has physical power over you, you don't have as much power over yourself as you think. An absolute truism that was demonstrated succinctly in the swift and absolute redefinition of the power hierarchy that occurs in The Dark Knight Rises between Bane and Daggett. "Do you feel in charge?"
/r/TheRedPill03/07/18 07:25 PM
2

"follow this as a minimum to having safe, fulfilling relationships" That is exactly it.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen29/06/18 03:38 PM
9

“If I put muscle into my sagging, worn, cellulite-ridden body, that should totally make up for my lack of youth, fertility, personality, and worthwhile traits”
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen29/06/18 03:22 AM
14

It's like the simple rules for becoming at least middle-class by the time you're thirty. Graduate high school Get a job Don't have children until you're married Don't marry until you're financially stable Follow those four fucking rules, and essentially anyone can wind up middle-class by their thirties. In the same way, dating: Make sure your SMV is high (if female, lock it down before 30) No whoring around No substance abuse Commitment
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen29/06/18 12:50 AM
4

Induce cognitive dissonance to win. Make it so they can't refute what you're saying while being unable/unwilling to accept what you're saying.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen29/06/18 12:46 AM
25

Always repeat the axiom: From the female/simp/gynocentric-apologia: "You aren't entitled to sex" And the rejoinder axiom: "And you aren't entitled to (men's) attention, resources, or commitment"
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen26/06/18 10:11 PM
6

50 shades and homeless bums spanking are both pretty nasty thoughts. That's not even an extreme kink, by any means at all.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen26/06/18 10:06 PM
3

You are 34, and well past your prime. You are a boring shell of a person. You do not get to make demands.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen22/06/18 04:11 AM
1

As God has decreed it, so too shall we faithful few do.
/r/TheRedPill20/06/18 03:57 AM
1

I’ve heard it said as “men are the gatekeepers kd commitment”
/r/TheRedPill20/06/18 03:50 AM
1

I’ll append a brief crusher to the front of that. “You won’t. That just makes you a slut.” Either she’s an impotent whiny idiot (damned if she doesn’t) or she’s a disloyal whore (damned if she does). It forces her to be one or the other.
/r/TheRedPill20/06/18 03:46 AM
1

If you reject her, there has to be an explicit reason why and it better be good This one is incredibly fun: “You don’t get one. Bye.” Anger that you thought was at a 10 before is dialed up to 11 Denying them closure is the greatest revenge you can have, and it cements the power dynamic permanently. It ensures you will not be forgotten, and that’s going to fucking eat at her on the deepest level possible.
/r/TheRedPill20/06/18 03:40 AM
51

These self-obsessed morons think they are entitled to your attraction. To your time, resources, and attention. To you.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen17/06/18 03:34 AM
21

Life, uh...finds a way
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen16/06/18 09:01 PM
4

Yeah, any possible ‘loss’ on his end would only result if he stayed.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen16/06/18 03:03 AM
3

“Any man who must say ‘I am the king’ is no true king”
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen14/06/18 05:00 PM
4

Ah, yes, a good old high maintenance bitch. I now know what we’re talking anout. It’s an archaic term, but I vaguely remember using it around the turn of the century.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen13/06/18 08:32 PM
12

Fuck it, it’s not like anyone truly needs a reason to get divorced. Don’t get married is the solution, though.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen11/06/18 03:14 AM
5

Oh, another one of these specific hypocrites. You cannot simultaneously claim "Doesn't Do Drugs" while also stating that you "Drink Socially" and "Smoke Occasionally." Nicotine is a drug, and smoking is deleterious to your health. Alcohol is likewise a drug. Either you're a hypocrite or you're an idiot if you claim you do not do drugs while also stating that you smoke and drink. Then, to top off this hypocrisy/stupidity, she demands high genetic status right off the bat by posing her entire post…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen09/06/18 10:24 PM
5

It's poetry, because it is.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen04/06/18 05:32 PM
5

Going to disagree with you there, boss. No sane man wants to be a sidelined second-rate FWB in a relationship woth someone who doesn’t value them and can’t wait to move on. No sane man would want to be in a relationship with this toxic failure, especially given her treatment of and disdain for the person she’s currently with. She’s a personification of cancer. She is a moral failure. She is a social dead-end. In no way would anyone ever want to be associated with this person in any capacity.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen03/06/18 07:28 PM
4

I’d posit that spheres are just one, large, complete curve.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen03/06/18 07:24 PM
4

Definitely in need of some basic education to supplement that ‘higher education’ she claims to be getting
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen01/06/18 10:18 PM
2

Tobacco is a controlled substance, and thus clearly a "real drug" Alcohol is a controlled substance, and thus clearly a "real drug" Sugar is not a controlled substance, and as such is not a "real drug" Edit: After mulling it over, I’ve decided to clarify it I will not be in a relationship with anyone who is a substance abuser (i.e. drug user). They obviously have mental issues that I don’t want passed on to my potential progeny, and I won’t be in a relationship with someone who has uncontrollabl…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen31/05/18 03:07 PM
5

Yes.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen31/05/18 06:49 AM
11

What?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen31/05/18 06:35 AM
97

Ah, yes, an "amusing" bio line on Tinder. Because women's primary metric for success in the dating market is biting wit and caustic "humor". In no way could it ever be that she doesn't know what she wants, and is attempting to be what she herself wants. This is like the post-wall bints who are unable to comprehend that the man they want: Successful career Older Direct, Confrontational, Dominant Experienced Social circle and social prestige Sets boundaries and has expectations and opinions that w…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen31/05/18 06:13 AM
1

Do you drink? - Socially Do you do drugs? - No Either you do both or you do neither, dumbass. Alcohol is very much a drug.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen30/05/18 11:31 PM
12

She looks like she's 30, though.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen30/05/18 11:30 PM
6

For reference, the short story itself: http://phocks.org/stumble/husband-store.php
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen30/05/18 11:28 PM
8

It's, amusingly, a self-selecting war of attrition akin to social natural selection. The idiotic and shortsighted will weed themselves out through their failure to plan long-term for family life or maintain disciplined action/principle. The gap between the 'haves' and the 'have nots' will continue to widen as those with similar ideals and goals select for each other.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen29/05/18 08:01 AM
23

Why don't men want forever anymore??? They do. Just not with you. Hopefully realizing this hurts so badly that you're forced to confront your lack of value and fix it. Given that you're in this situation and lamenting it, you're probably too stupid to do either of the aforementioned. Enjoy wallowing in the failure of what you could have been and what you could have had.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen22/05/18 03:01 AM
69

No lens has yet been developed that can fit her entire being in the frame.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen14/05/18 06:18 PM
9

A Freightliner can also be sold on the second-hand market when you decide to upgrade to a newer model. There’s no getting any amount of money back with this one.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen11/05/18 05:32 PM
15

He likely is so cucked he’s relishing a dicking from the bull as we speak because that’s the only way he’ll ever get to feel power inside himself
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen11/05/18 02:11 AM
4

...how do I counter a Min/Maxed build of this sort? Avoidance seems to be a good strat, since their stats can’t deal physical damage, but I don’t know what I should spec out to capitalize on this fairly prevalent opponent build type.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen11/05/18 02:07 AM
52

She’s mastered that ratty and insincere 3/4 profile pose for taking selfies.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/05/18 01:15 PM
2

As clueless as you are kid, it's not an attack.... it's an obliteration. Ah, the age-old "you're a child" retort. That may have worked for you on the playground, but it doesn't hold water here. What's next, you're going to call me a "troll"? I'm glad you admit you're just mindlessly attacking, with the point of 'obliterating', whatever that means. Take you whiney sniveling back to your safe space You clearly don't understand the definition of "whiny" (not "whiney", as you put it) or "sniveling",…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen07/05/18 06:34 AM
1

So killallmen is fine Nobody said it was. But when it's killallgays or Killallmexicans THEN it's an issue Nobody said any of those things. Welp, so glad we cleared up the whole hating cis whitey What are you on about? ya'know all us racist crackas who destroyed the world and ruined every country on earth with our oppressive patriarchy thing Is this some sort of elaborate troll? Thank's bro for pointing out how much of a retard I am for forgetting my groupthink rules. No, you simply don't get to …
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen07/05/18 05:14 AM
6

Get on it while you can, the demand is high and the line is long
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen07/05/18 04:40 AM
2

how does a creepy rapist like you handle it You aren't making any sense. You don't get to attack people because they correctly point out your flawed logic. You especially do not get to Kafkatrap through the train of thought that "Not decrying derogatory statements directed at a certain group of men means that you hate men" Go on.... Tell me... All that you are going to be told is that you're acting insane and you are going to stop or you are going to be blocked/banned.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen07/05/18 04:05 AM
24

She can't even spell, let alone be bothered to take a modicum of pride in her body. She's a recovering substance abuser who claims to both "Love Jesus" and be "spiritual" but she claims she "[is] not religious". In the same post where she sexualizes herself via glamour shots, she demands that you "[not] come at her all sexual" or even start a basic conversation with the most basic of conversation starters (e.g. "What's up?"), and further demands that you "bring your game." She's well over the Wa…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen07/05/18 03:57 AM
4

I don't see how this fits this sub at all. The point that you're trying to make is that calling people "Incels" is somehow on par with racial and sexual epithets, which is odd, and then you proceed to insult a woman (who has admittedly done some shady and unprofessional things to the detriment of this site) using a racial slur. This chick doesn't seem to be a Carol of any sort based on this meme-y submission, and the submission doesn't follow Rule 5 in the least.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen07/05/18 03:23 AM
1

...and was willing to admit his error when it was pointed out
/r/TheRedPill05/05/18 02:40 AM
4

I don’t quite know what I expected from that sub, but I feel my expectations were deeply wrong.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen04/05/18 10:21 PM
8

In Leftist economics, the delineation is between those who possess/control the means of production (the bourgeoise) and those who do the work for the former (the proletariat). Or, the oppressors and the oppressed, as reflected by resources/value/control/self-determination. We could define the sexual bourgeoise in several ways: Those who control the sexual means of (re)production Those who possess the sexual marketplace value Those who others must work for in the sexual marketplace by dint of pos…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen04/05/18 10:14 PM
2

It was fun while it lasted
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen04/05/18 02:22 AM
4

She claims that she's overweight and working on it, but fails to realize that it isn't trying that matters it is both doing and being that matter. It does not matter one whit if you're trying to be attractive, what matters is whether or not you are attractive (or valuable, successful, intelligent, etc.). When you place yourself in a marketplace, it is irrelevant what your perception of yourself is, what matters is other's perception of you. This is how market value works. You can deludedly assum…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen03/05/18 09:03 PM
8

The amount of people positively incensed by reality in that thread is beyond amazing Those are the people who will wallow in mediocrity and failure while the successful people in life leave them behind for the worthless heaps they are
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen30/04/18 11:22 PM
9

Actor What I what someone what a job You can't even take pride in the most low-effort and easy thing possible: correct spelling and grammar. Why would anyone worth their salt want to be with someone who doesn't give a damn about the easiest of things? like a doctor or a surgeon or a UFC fight You're either mentally retarded, delusional, or impossibly entitled, if not all three. I'm in a wheelchair People who spend their career either making people break ("UFC Fight") or patching up broken people…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen30/04/18 06:28 PM
5

That's the biggest slap in the face of all. You're telling me, a 6/6/6/6 (6' tall, 6" dick, 6 figure income, 6-pack abs) male who's massively successful, that my genetics are worth a measly $50? Fuck. off. You have to put in a hell of a lot more work than that and not only have but commensurately provide vastly more value than that to get me or even my genetics (since that's what this is truly about). You don't get to reduce me to a series of superior biological traits that you can check off and…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen30/04/18 05:04 PM
6

Holy fucking shit there's so much entitlement in these demands that absolutely must be met for a sperm donor to a post-wall haggosaurus.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen30/04/18 01:56 AM
1

that was an advantage I had by waiting until my 30’s to get serious about dating So much this. Always hold the power in the relationship, especially by dint of success and value.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen23/04/18 10:48 PM
3

You're clearly missing the hyperbole.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen23/04/18 01:33 AM
20

Comeuppance Carol
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen22/04/18 09:46 PM
2

Those nails are also an instant and emphatic 'no'
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen22/04/18 09:45 PM
5

[She] may be 2'7" and 18, but she is just stunningly beautiful. Beautiful: Attractive, or appealing to look at; sexually alluring No, mom, that's not how "beautiful" works. Especially when, to compound the dwarfism, she's also disabled.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen22/04/18 09:43 PM
31

I'm a total feminist, but I'm also a total traditionalist in my mind when it comes to dating, I don't want to date a guy who wants me to be a stay-at-home wife unless I decide I want to be that but I still think a guy should pay on a first date Jesus Christ that video gave me cancer
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen22/04/18 03:04 AM
5

I absolutely can’t wait to get into a relationship with a mother who has both teenagers and a newborn, the two areas of child-rearing that suck the most.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen20/04/18 09:10 PM
2

I shouldn't have to lower my standards because im dark skin and overweight First off, your skin color is irrelevant. It doesn't determine your value, and the fact that you think it does tells the world everything that needs to be known about your actual value. Secondly, your standards and values are irrelevant if you are low-value. You don't have to lower anything; you take what you can get because you have no options as a corollary to the absence of any personal value. You don't make the decisi…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen15/04/18 12:22 AM
9

This is such a weird profile. She leads off with an older shock joke that's even made the rounds on /r/ImGoingToHellForThis and /r/Tinder, which is fine albeit unoriginal. She immediately then segues into directly stating that she will ruin your life and desires abuse, and it's very unclear if she's being ironic, sarcastic, or just playing off of the previous "joke" for shock value if not outright stating the truth. After that, she bounces between what are either poor attempts at sarcastic shock…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen14/04/18 11:51 PM
5

I enjoyed reading it. Thank you for typing it out.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen29/03/18 12:08 AM
16

Let's do a point-by-point breakdown of the red flags in this: I'm a single mom with two kids No guy worth their salt with any self-respect would settle for raising another man's children with an aged woman who has nothing in the looks department. I'm looking for someone who will treat me and my kids with respect. You're looking for a guy who fundamentally doesn't respect himself, based on your first statement. If he doesn't respect himself, he isn't going to "respect" you or your kids. I deserve…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen29/03/18 12:08 AM
8

Absolutely, multiple chapters of one of his books (‘Surely You’re Joking, Mr. Feynman’) dealt with exactly how Nice Guys don’t prosper and how he exercised the power of Chad to great dating success by not giving a flying fuck about the women he slept with. He was an all-around wonderful character.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen26/03/18 08:59 PM
11

Feynman spent his spare time in much the same way.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen26/03/18 08:07 PM
1

“In the throes of terminal pregnancy, I’m begging anyone to throw me a lifeline.”
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen24/03/18 09:46 PM
4

Perhaps if one is legally blind and braindead
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen24/03/18 09:45 PM
13

She’s getting played like a piano in Maestro Chadwick’s orchestra
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen24/03/18 03:02 AM
1

If she can’t even spell properly, there’s no chance in hell that she can function intelligently and effectively at anything else in life that requires complex thought, reasoning, and planning, like raising children.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen18/03/18 04:59 PM
4

That's inane. Actions have consequences. If someone can't handle the consequences, they shouldn't do the deeds. Absconding all responsibility and avoiding the outcome of your actions is immature and idiotic. If someone can't handle basic adult responsibility and function, they deserve to be shamed and ostracized.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen07/03/18 01:28 AM
13

Person who doesn't have their shit together can't find someone who has "there shit together" Maybe life actually isn't like magnets, Mandee, and like attracts like instead of opposites attracting.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen04/03/18 08:49 PM
6

Ironic shitposting is still shitposting
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen04/03/18 01:50 AM
10

Bitter harridan-in-the-making doesn't understand why not establishing boundaries and not investing in herself or setting goals for self-betterment isn't getting her what she wants
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen28/02/18 11:08 PM
9

...most women compromise deeply on sexual attractiveness in the man they eventually marry and reproduce with. Women don't compromise because they want to. They compromise because they have no choice if they want to get married. I have nothing to add here, I just want to congratulate you on the profundity of this observation.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen26/02/18 09:19 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter