TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

CedMon Archive

View 16 posts and 757 comments by CedMon on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
98

CedMon/r/MensRights10/05/13 02:48 PM
80

CedMon/r/MensRights14/05/12 08:27 PM
62

CedMon/r/MensRights05/03/13 03:22 PM
44

CedMon/r/MensRights28/02/13 02:50 PM
40

CedMon/r/MensRights24/01/12 03:43 AM
38

CedMon/r/MensRights21/11/12 02:28 PM
25

CedMon/r/MensRights23/01/12 07:24 PM
13

CedMon/r/MensRights11/04/12 07:12 PM
12

CedMon/r/MensRights01/08/12 02:00 AM
7

CedMon/r/MensRights23/01/13 02:36 PM
5

CedMon/r/MensRights09/01/12 11:38 PM
5

CedMon/r/MensRights16/10/12 04:02 AM
5

CedMon/r/MensRights07/02/12 05:26 PM
3

CedMon/r/MensRights13/03/12 09:24 PM
0

CedMon/r/MensRights06/02/13 07:03 PM
0

CedMon/r/MensRights02/05/13 05:32 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
6

http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/24yvd9/looks_like_a_female_sub_made_it_to_default/ 2 hour old thread http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/24z7gi/rtwoxchromosomes_now_a_default_subreddit/ 35 minute old thread. Also countless threads that were deleted due to not having np links. Downvoting threads in /new is exactly what should be done when something is being spammed.
/r/MensRights07/05/14 08:18 PM
1

http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/24yvd9/looks_like_a_female_sub_made_it_to_default/ That post is 2 hours old.
/r/MensRights07/05/14 08:16 PM
2

I like that you're really spamming a topic that's consistently downvoted. My personal thought is that we don't need a new thread on this every minute.
/r/MensRights07/05/14 08:13 PM
2

Do we really need a new post about this ever 15 minutes?
/r/MensRights07/05/14 08:06 PM
2

Why start a new thread? Why not post in the one that already exists: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/24yvd9/looks_like_a_female_sub_made_it_to_default/
/r/MensRights07/05/14 07:55 PM
6

How about me? I downvoted this and I've posted in the community quite a bit.
/r/MensRights07/05/14 07:33 PM
18

Am I over reacting in thinking that making it a default subreddit is a terribly bias thing to do? Yes. Becoming a default isn't exactly something I think most communities would like/survive.
/r/MensRights07/05/14 05:44 PM
10

My advice to you is to ALWAYS have a recording device on you whenever you go somewhere that you're likely to encounter females, JUST IN CASE something happens and shit goes down. You should record audio at all times to ensure that they can't pull off any funny business. When did this subreddit go crazy?
/r/MensRights16/04/14 12:03 AM
2

http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1e2kbs/men_get_sexually_harassed_too_and_its_harder_on/
/r/MensRights10/05/13 07:17 PM
2

I haven't had a chance to read the paper yet but it looks to be relatively short. http://psychology.msu.edu/vaw/core_faculty/nicole_buchanan/Articles/Rederstorff,%20Buchanan%20&%20Settles%20(2007).pdf
/r/MensRights10/05/13 02:51 PM
3

Or before another mod gets banned for "doxxing".
/r/MensRights22/04/13 02:38 PM
2

Good article here, but watch out for the Sun - it's known to be overly conservative by Canadian standards and has one employee spew hate speech on air.
/r/MensRights12/04/13 01:56 PM
4

That game looks really cool to play though, and that's all that should matter.
/r/MensRights12/04/13 01:52 PM
24

If you're a Canadian, report this application the Privacy Commissioner. http://www.priv.gc.ca/complaint-plainte/ps_pipeda_e.asp
/r/MensRights11/04/13 04:46 PM
5

Relevant stats from the blog: •EVERY YEAR there are approximately 10 youth suicides for every 100,000 youth. •EVERY DAY there are approximately 11 youth suicides. •EVERY 2 HOURS AND 11 MINUTES a person under the age of 25 completes suicide According to Child Trends Databank, among males, suicide rates in 2003 were highest among the following: Native American (24.7 per 100,000) Non-Hispanic whites (13.3 per 100,000) Hispanics at 9.2 per 100,000 Asians at 6.7 per 100,000 Blacks at 6.6 per 100,000.…
/r/MensRights28/03/13 03:25 PM
1

I think we shouldn't be quick to side with either party no matter whether the story is believable or not. The user indicated that they've contacted the police and I think allowing an investigation to be completed first would be the prudent action.
/r/MensRights21/03/13 03:46 PM
2

(he is also a pedophile and used to make me find porn for him, convinced me this was morally ok.) She's also contacting the police. I wouldn't be so quick to make judgments and take the guys side until a police investigation has occurred.
/r/MensRights21/03/13 03:17 PM
3

She isn't yet, at least on one of the larger HR blacklist databases. http://www.hrblacklist.com/
/r/MensRights20/03/13 02:05 PM
1

Direct link to the referenced article: http://www.newsday.com/opinion/columnists/cathy-young/young-don-t-let-politics-obscure-the-facts-in-rape-cases-1.4835852
/r/MensRights20/03/13 01:59 PM
5

As I said in the discussion of this article in /r/CanadaPolitics: Now, I don't agree with what mr. Woodworth has to say but he should still be able to voice his opinion no matter how much anyone disagrees with it.
/r/MensRights18/03/13 06:58 PM
0

Roosh is sort of a scummy pick up artist.
/r/MensRights15/03/13 02:01 PM
5

No linking to SRS or affiliated subs, or Gawker Media websites.
/r/MensRights14/03/13 07:41 PM
1

No linking to SRS or affiliated subs, or Gawker Media websites.
/r/MensRights14/03/13 01:58 PM
4

Not the best article but I don’t know that Fiamengo made a sound academic case. What I do know is that she deserves respect for gathering evidence and calmly presenting it. She also offered advice all students should heed. “Educate yourselves so you can challenge [each other],” and, “do it will style, not hatred.” Also not the worst.
/r/MensRights08/03/13 08:39 PM
2

Direct link to the reason blog it links to. http://reason.com/blog/2013/03/07/southern-poverty-law-center-finds-fewer
/r/MensRights08/03/13 03:42 PM
1

Yup, no pre-order of tickets.
/r/MensRights05/03/13 05:34 PM
14

If you're in the area please come by and show your support! If you have a handy cam, bring it as I suspect this event will be protested.
/r/MensRights05/03/13 03:23 PM
2

Sub's rules. We get accused of brigading way more than we deserve and the rule was made to resolve that issue.
/r/MensRights05/03/13 03:01 PM
1

Links to subreddits with <30k subscribers must be to posts >24h old
/r/MensRights05/03/13 02:55 PM
1

Adam Johnson can definitely hold his own in the comments though.
/r/MensRights01/03/13 02:57 PM
0

Links to subreddits with less than 30k subscribers must be >24h old.
/r/MensRights25/02/13 03:15 PM
1

It hasn't started yet, check here: http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?iso=20130219T1300&p1=179
/r/MensRights19/02/13 03:34 PM
2

While I don't agree with the "Any amount of alcohol" statement I'm happy to see that those who espouse this view are starting to do so in a gender neutral way.
/r/MensRights19/02/13 03:32 PM
5

Per the Vagina Monolouges, a female molester is a 'good' molester. Just to give some context on this for a casual reader, this is referencing the below. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vagina_Monologues#The_case_of_Robert_Swope
/r/MensRights08/02/13 02:52 PM
5

I posted this same article here, for some reason it's not showing up in other discussions or when anyone attempts to post it again.
/r/MensRights06/02/13 09:43 PM
1

Posting this, not because I agree, but because it's an open letter to the community. **Edit: Looks like 'Other Discussions' isn't showing its been posted in /feminism or /TwoXChromosomes as well by the blogs author - ExplainsRedditToYou
/r/MensRights06/02/13 07:04 PM
2

Completed the survey and left feedback. I suggest anyone wanting to go through the survey to buckle down and complete it, you can leave detailed feedback at the end which allowed me to voice my concerns over the questions to those who will be reviewing the answers.
/r/MensRights05/02/13 06:46 PM
2

The stamp indicates that it can stay up until Feb 03.
/r/MensRights01/02/13 02:30 PM
6

The comments on the article cheer me up! At least the readers aren't buying it. Good comment on suffrage in Canada in the comments as well: Seems like you haven't been reading your history, because if you did you'd know that not only was the vote restricted to men of the upper class, but that wealthy women were allowed to vote in 1916 while most of the 67,000 soldiers who died in WW1 were denied that right. In fact both men and women in won the right to universal suffrage in 1920.
/r/MensRights25/01/13 03:16 PM
3

No linking to SRS or affiliated subs, or Gawker Media websites.
/r/MensRights23/01/13 09:31 PM
2

Damn, now I have to play Burrito Bison again. They have a sequel to that flash game now.
/r/MensRights22/01/13 03:18 PM
4

Also /enoughMRAspam, they seem new. http://www.reddit.com/r/enoughMRAspam/comments/16qxb1/help_get_the_mrm_flagged_as_a_hate_group_on/
/r/MensRights17/01/13 03:12 PM
4

Taking into account the rough translation of Google. This is a pretty good article, it shows that at least some people are thinking and talking about this issue, sadly the comments paint a sad picture of the publics perception. Those who may be suspected, should not be there. Being suspected is as good as guilty. There are not unfounded suspicions. Suspicions arise not without reason. Suspicion of a crime means the crime occured apparently. pedophiles are lurking in the bushes and what attracts …
/r/MensRights10/01/13 08:15 PM
8

I don't think getting overly offended by jokes is really something worth pursuing. Reverse the genders and it's still a joke, the only difference is that feminists would be upset about it... I'm not willing to mirror their reactions over jokes.
/r/MensRights10/01/13 07:58 PM
2

The horror, calling a beauty contestant beautiful. What is the world coming to where men think they can just go around complimenting women who compete in beauty pageants on their looks?
/r/MensRights10/01/13 04:36 PM
1

Sorry... The page you have requested does not exist or is no longer available.
/r/MensRights09/01/13 02:44 PM
6

They're all on the same story, just a different source.
/r/MensRights03/01/13 04:48 PM
5

Saved! New response for when someone says "What has the Mens Rights Movement actually done?".
/r/MensRights18/12/12 09:49 PM
1

/r/BanGawker for context to the reason for its ban on this sub.
/r/MensRights18/12/12 05:53 PM
2

A mod should put this on the sidebar or in the header to get this more views. I'm not sure who's downvoted this post but I know I'm going to donate.
/r/MensRights13/12/12 11:14 PM
2

"are wont to do" As in accustomed, used <got up early as he is wont to do>
/r/MensRights12/12/12 02:15 AM
5

Coward is used that way too To be fair, not really: Cowardice is a trait wherein fear and excess self-concern override what is socially deemed as right and courageous action vs Sissy (derived from sister;[citation needed] also sissy baby, sissy boy, etc.) is a pejorative term for a boy or man who violates or does not meet the traditional male gender role. Generally, sissy implies a lack of courage and stoicism So they do mean the same thing as they both mean lack of courage but 'sissy' is a gend…
/r/MensRights12/12/12 02:11 AM
3

You know you're arguing with someones alt account, right? They're most likely someone that's not from this subreddit (see their post history) trolling you.
/r/MensRights26/11/12 04:25 AM
3

Apt comment from the article: Isn't it ironic that the photo chosen for this article includes Dr. Samarasekara, the president of the University of Alberta, who is one of the highest paid university officials in Canada, male or female. Not a good choice if one is trying to make a point about gender pay equity.
/r/MensRights22/11/12 02:30 PM
3

Isn't the train in Japan like the only real way to get anywhere with any amount of efficiency? While I was visiting Tokyo I remember noticing the roads being packed full of cars not moving in the morning, middle of the day, and night.
/r/MensRights22/11/12 02:28 PM
1

/r/OffBeat comments are rarely serious, it's the community.
/r/MensRights21/11/12 02:37 PM
4

Poe's Law. If you grabbed this from /r/TumblrInAction the comments there also generally agree that it's Poe's Law and that you've been trolled.
/r/MensRights16/11/12 09:25 PM
2

denied service As long as it's a privately funded service. If it's publicly funded then QuantumFox has every right to complain.
/r/MensRights16/11/12 02:23 PM
3

In Vancouver: http://www.bcbusinessonline.ca/vancouvers-women-only-hotel-floor
/r/MensRights16/11/12 02:22 PM
10

Womens only salon advertisement. True, it's Monday that's womens only but the barber offered to find someone willing to cut her hair and that wasn't good enough for her.
/r/MensRights15/11/12 08:31 PM
1

A little of both but directed at Tumblr. I learned about it because SRS was getting mad about it actually, I found that to be hypocritical and rather funny so I subbed.
/r/MensRights15/11/12 02:21 PM
2

Since people wrote books on it. Literally, the requirements are quite low if you look here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Identifying_reliable_sources If you can find enough sources that meet the requirements of that page you can make an article about anything.
/r/MensRights14/11/12 08:09 PM
1

http://ca.movember.com/ I ask everyone I know to help donate. I talk about prostate cancer, tell them about the survival rates, treatments, and about how I believe the funding for research in this field is underfunded.
/r/MensRights14/11/12 07:54 PM
2

I've raised $650 so far by doing Movember and not shaving!
/r/MensRights14/11/12 07:41 PM
6

I think that's generally the point. Most people on Tumblr in the "social justice" areas make little to no sense. That subreddit is dedicated to pointing out and making fun of the extremes found in that context. They adopt the terms used by the people they're making fun of/pointing out the ridiculousness of in order to drive that point home.
/r/MensRights14/11/12 07:15 PM
14

I believe you're looking for /r/TumblrInAction.
/r/MensRights14/11/12 06:34 PM
15

I believe you're looking for /r/TumblrInAction.
/r/MensRights14/11/12 06:34 PM
2

Depends where you live, I know a couple active Mens Rights groups in my area and I know a couple exist across Canada. With quick googling I found Vancouver, Edmonton, Ottawa, and Montreal groups that have discussions at universities to organize activist campaigns. Also, when I was visiting a friend in BC I saw several posters in regards to issues that are of concern to Mens Rights Activists and directed people to meetings and websites that looked to be for MRA information.
/r/MensRights14/11/12 05:47 PM
2

This was attempted before but because no accurate sources could be found on the subject it was condensed into the Mens Rights page. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mens_rights#Female_privilege and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Male_privilege#Against_the_notion_of_male_privilege
/r/MensRights14/11/12 05:41 PM
5

You would think that, but it really just makes whomever you show more persistent in their disagreement.
/r/MensRights14/11/12 02:38 PM
5

... angelfire? I haven't seen that domain since I was in primary school.
/r/MensRights12/11/12 06:28 PM
12

Looks like you're still shadow banned and the mods are approving your submissions.
/r/MensRights19/10/12 06:45 PM
2

The subreddit admins can see your post in the spam filter and restore it I think.
/r/MensRights19/10/12 06:42 PM
0

I hate that comedian.
/r/MensRights17/10/12 08:18 PM
-15

No linking to SRS or affiliated subs.
/r/MensRights15/10/12 06:33 PM
1

Shock subreddit that I'm not willing to navigate to.
/r/MensRights15/10/12 12:15 AM
3

Full list (not mine and I won't be updating it) of sites that issues bans for those links... I guess it has something to do with /r/parakeets eh? /r/ancientrome | (post) /r/Bad_Cop_No_Donut | (post) /r/bisexualadults | (post) /r/borderlands | (post) /r/Cinemagraphs | (post) /r/drunkdrivingstories /r/fifthworldproblems | (post) /r/firewater | | (post) /r/fuckthoseguys /r/games /r/gaming /r/MensRights | (post) /r/parakeets | (post) /r/politics | (post) /r/RapingWomen /r/SexyAbortions /r/srdgonewil…
/r/MensRights11/10/12 07:10 PM
4

So because people vilify /r/Mensrights we should stay silent? Doesn't sound like a good tactic to me. I would also argue that /r/SubredditDrama is vilified for those things as well.
/r/MensRights11/10/12 07:06 PM
2

Are you posting this to /r/Politics, /r/Games, /r/Gaming, and /r/SubredditDrama? I'm asking because they've taken the same stance that /r/MensRights has.
/r/MensRights11/10/12 06:46 PM
5

Although it's interesting in a very Meta sorta way I'm not sure how this is related to the MRM directly.
/r/MensRights11/10/12 05:36 PM
0

SuicideBanana is an SRS false-flag troll. While I agree that this is sometimes the case with that user in this case I have to agree. I don't think anything would come of this and this post is emotionally driven, not logically.
/r/MensRights11/10/12 01:43 PM
1

explanation
/r/MensRights11/10/12 01:09 PM
44

They normally do it through social engineering and going through all the posts you've ever written to see if they can find who you are. I'm not saying it's possible to do against everyone but all it takes is posting seemingly innocuous information that can be pieced together with other posts. The harm it can do? Personal threats, loss of job, constant harassment, death threats, physical attacks. Who knows what the unstable would do with your home address/phone number/name?
/r/MensRights10/10/12 08:51 PM
17

Someone threatened a past Mod of this sub with Doxxing and he had to step down as a mod out of fear of losing his job.
/r/MensRights10/10/12 08:32 PM
3

I'm not disputing that, I was just pointing out my genuine surprise to see you (a known power-redditor) on this sub which a lot of people shy away from. Also, I used to cycle through reddit accounts often; this one's been my oldest so far... Even though you've still been here longer than any of my accounts.
/r/MensRights10/10/12 08:27 PM
7

Wait, andrewsmith1986 on /r/MensRights? We're making it to the big leagues!
/r/MensRights10/10/12 08:18 PM
72

Producing real life information about an online persona. So if I found out your real name and location and I go ahead and post it here (even if I don't mean to do so maliciously) that would be doxxing.
/r/MensRights10/10/12 08:16 PM
2

Not that I approve of the sub but /r/Creepyshots has replaced it.
/r/MensRights10/10/12 08:14 PM
19

I personally think it's an empty threat but my suggestion to you is that if you are threatened in this way you take the matter to the Reddit Admins and don't shy away from legal action.
/r/MensRights10/10/12 06:48 PM
1

[Removed]
/r/MensRights10/10/12 01:19 PM
1

Assuming you're a troll since you're an 1 hour old account. No, government has no place in dictating relationship norms.
/r/MensRights09/10/12 06:28 PM
1

Yea, I don't think it'll be an issue but I wanted to provide the link just in case anyone had issues and came to the comments to check. Good article find btw!
/r/MensRights09/10/12 03:37 PM
3

Link to the article, not the comments.
/r/MensRights09/10/12 03:19 PM
-2

Reporting since the number after your name makes me think you've been banned from this sub at least 27 times already.
/r/MensRights04/10/12 02:25 PM
0

Sorry, I forgot context: none of us online are in any position to ask her details and investigate enough to tell her not to go to the cops. Sure we are. She came to us. She got drunk and had sex. It's not rape. End of story. (Of course, the OP is a troll who made up the story in the first place.)
/r/MensRights01/10/12 08:50 PM
5

How are you so sure she wasn't and why are you arguing tooth an nail saying she shouldn't go to the police and present all her facts to the police and allow them to look into the issue?
/r/MensRights01/10/12 08:49 PM
2

Obvious SRS troll is obvious.
/r/MensRights01/10/12 08:39 PM
2

She got drunk and had sex. It's not rape. End of story. TIL that if you get drunk and have sex it's never rape according to trollman2000, no matter the circumstances. MODS! BAN THIS TROLL ALREADY.
/r/MensRights01/10/12 08:34 PM
3

She did give consent She did not say that so I'm not sure where you're getting that from, she said that she can't remember if she did or did not. She never once said that she had given consent and then changed her mind as you're implying. **Edit: I see this has already been explained to you and you obviously didn't understand. I don't see the point of me continuing to explain this to you.
/r/MensRights01/10/12 08:30 PM
2

without proof of this accusation I'm surprised you're being upvoted.
/r/MensRights01/10/12 05:33 PM
6

Legolas-the-elf, the anti-MRA. Wow, another post proving this user is a troll. Mods, this user is calling another user an "anti-MRA" because they told someone that was raped to go to the police, please ban this user as a troll. This comment is a flag to the Mods, not a response to Trollman2000. **Edit: note that this user has only responded to Legolas this way, obviously they're a troll as they're targeting this specific user.
/r/MensRights01/10/12 05:03 PM
6

No linking to SRS or affiliated subs.
/r/MensRights28/09/12 03:52 PM
1

Secondary then Post Secondary school. I then went on and read a lot of books in regards to gender issues and a whole lot of reading of academic papers (that come up in this sub often and over at /r/MensRightsLinks).
/r/MensRights28/09/12 02:22 PM
6

Those comments hurt my brain. I'm surprised that the school is backing him and I wish them the best of luck getting him back on the team, no one should be denied an opportunity to excel because of what they have in between their legs.
/r/MensRights28/09/12 02:17 PM
2

Like I said, I agree totally in this instance. I was just commenting on what I believed to be their motivation.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 10:44 PM
4

They'll deny it but when I've asked for sources of their assertions they've pointed me towards blogs that use pick up artists as their "academic" source. **Edit: Context
/r/MensRights27/09/12 04:23 PM
8

While I agree with you I believe Bobsutan is alluding to the fact that when women are killed in a similar way media outlets usually state "50 people killed, 10 of which where women" which dehumanizes the 40 men that were killed.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 03:42 PM
7

Truthman2000 is a known troll, downvote and ignore.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 01:27 PM
2

You're complaining about having a lot of /r/MensRights users "swarming" in /r/MensRights... Wow, that would be like being suprised that you'd find SRS regulars in SRS. Also, just took a look at your /r/Feminisms post; didn't go over so well there either with regular 2X, Feminism, Feminisms, and AskFeminist users, maybe it's just a shitty article?
/r/MensRights26/09/12 07:29 PM
3

How dare this sub's regulars comment and vote on a submission AMIRITE?
/r/MensRights26/09/12 06:55 PM
0

I think it would be enough to say that instead of linking you should provide a screenshot, this should have less users wandering over and voting.
/r/MensRights26/09/12 05:17 PM
2

Direct Link: http://www.articlesaboutmen.com/2012/08/dads-banned-from-nursery-to-avoid-offending-muslims-911/24251/
/r/MensRights25/09/12 04:16 PM
1

You should try /r/MensRightsMeta
/r/MensRights25/09/12 01:32 PM
1

I suggest you take a look at the linked article on reliable sources. Depending on the context most of what you've stated is acceptable in specific circumstances and it looks like aVfM was blacklisted due to spam (I saw that elsewhere in this thread).
/r/MensRights25/09/12 01:17 PM
3

I would think that the large number of authors at AVfM, their length of time, the size of their traffic would serve to make them a reliable source. I 100% agree but sadly the world at large is still unsure of how it feels about the MRM and we haven't achieved the proper notoriety to be respected academically. I believe we have to raise our level of discourse and show people outside the MRM that we are a true movement that's working for true equality for everyone. Also, since the release of the o…
/r/MensRights24/09/12 09:01 PM
2

Sigh, I fear you're right.
/r/MensRights24/09/12 08:56 PM
7

What a surprise. Anything I do link will be dismissed, as you cling to your pet ideology. You must show the standard of proof, you failed this. I apologize that you're throwing a tantrum but this won't correct the logical fallacies you've produced with sources that don't prove your point.
/r/MensRights24/09/12 08:53 PM
8

First link contains no academic sources (the news articles he sources don't either) except for one by Jane Goodall and I don't think we can directly link all sapien psychology as they're too dissimilar. Second link contains no academic sources and even goes as far as to reference pick up artists as a "reliable source". Third link at best proves that sex differences exist, not conclusively the ones you're asserting. I suggest you spend a few years looking into what a reliable source to prove a po…
/r/MensRights24/09/12 08:49 PM
12

It's creepy to have any administrator paddle any student.
/r/MensRights24/09/12 08:21 PM
3

Whether this likelihood is innate or due to environment is debatable, but usually it's a little bit of both, and I see no reason to claim women's abuse is any different. Given everything we know about the differences between men and women and how they've reacted so very differently when granted power in the home, it becomes clear that women's greater tendency for abuse is at least partially due to women's nature. Source?
/r/MensRights24/09/12 08:19 PM
3

I have no interest in any particular form of abuse, I just want truthman2000 to back up the generalization that women lead overall when combining all forms of abuse as their comment said.
/r/MensRights24/09/12 08:18 PM
53

To be fair aVfM isn't exactly a reliable source: Anyone can create a website or pay to have a book published, then claim to be an expert in a certain field. For that reason self-published media—whether books, newsletters, personal websites, open wikis, blogs, personal pages on social networking sites, Internet forum postings, or tweets—are largely not acceptable. Activism starts in the real world, not on Wikipedia.
/r/MensRights24/09/12 07:29 PM
6

I've seen the one that shows that mothers commit more child abuse than fathers but the statement was "Women are more abusive than men" which implies in every category. I just haven't seen any stats to back up that abuse in general is mostly perpetrated by women. I'm mostly asking this of truthman2000 as they've been posting statements that make (in my mind) fallacious generalizations of all women without backing them up with stats although they claim they have stats for all their statements and …
/r/MensRights24/09/12 07:25 PM
6

Sources? Yet another indication that women are more abusive than men.
/r/MensRights24/09/12 06:50 PM
7

A private company, vote with your dollars and don't go.
/r/MensRights24/09/12 06:19 PM
9

Not being from the region myself and not understanding the local social dynamic I'm unwilling to support this topic. I don't want to display the same reactionary behaviour some feminists have when confronted with a situation where I'm so out of my element that I couldn't even begin to understand the social dynamics of the situation. I will say that a whole lot of shit is fucked up in some parts of the middle east though and no one has it good (outside of religious zealots) in those areas.
/r/MensRights21/09/12 02:13 PM
3

Petition is nice and all but these things never work (I've seen this same petition many times in the past). The structure of Reddit makes it so the Admins won't interfere unless something is obviously illegal/they get a request for takedown by a real world authority like the police.
/r/MensRights21/09/12 01:15 PM
5

No linking to SRS or affiliated subs.
/r/MensRights20/09/12 01:16 PM
16

This whole thing is spiraling out of control and getting messy, good on JtO for keeping his head on straight and not lowering himself to their level. Making this issue transparent so everyone understands what's going on just gives the MRM more positive coverage and I think releasing these emails is a smart move.
/r/MensRights19/09/12 03:47 PM
5

I don't think you should be cross posting your own threads from /r/Feminism to here just for additional upvotes. At least, not within the first hour because it becomes impossible to distinguish the upvote/downvote ratio from the actual regulars of that sub.
/r/MensRights17/09/12 08:22 PM
4

They're no better than SRS, in Meta they're discussing rules that would disallow linking to them. I suggest you read through some submissions and comments in that sub to see why. **Ninja edit: I do agree that this isn't really a MRM issue though.
/r/MensRights17/09/12 04:07 PM
35

I play at employment too, don't worry about it.
/r/MensRights14/09/12 03:50 PM
1

Seeing as this came from /r/SRSSucks and was posted by a user named 'EvilFuckingSociopath' 10 hours ago and they admit to finding it on /r/Facepalm I would assume someone's getting trolled here.
/r/MensRights12/09/12 07:48 PM
8

If you believe The latest addition to the SRS-Fempire Which I would agree with then this post falls close to the rule: No linking to SRS or affiliated subs. I would interpret the above rule to also include discussing those subs myself but I don't know if the mod policy extends that far. Either way, discussing that sub, giving that sub attention, going to that sub to discuss issues will not be productive and I'm not sure why you would want to give them any attention. If someone is crazy enough to…
/r/MensRights12/09/12 05:49 PM
7

This sub is not affiliated with AntiSRS and it doesn't link to SRS or affiliated subs so I'm not sure why this is being linked here as it doesn't pertain to the MRM or any of the MRMs issues.
/r/MensRights11/09/12 07:46 PM
7

Yea, also no shame in waiting till your course is complete! Don't risk your education if you think it would adversely effect your ability to pass.
/r/MensRights11/09/12 07:42 PM
3

Nothing wrong with dissenting opinions, those opinions are the ones that help us grow.
/r/MensRights11/09/12 05:40 PM
13

tl;dr Don't be an idiot, you're in the wrong class if you think you're supposed to discuss male issues. How was he supposed to know that it was the wrong class before he paid for it? It is named Gender Studies so it's fair to assume it would explore the issues of both genders, not just one.
/r/MensRights11/09/12 05:20 PM
144

See your Dean, bring proof, request that the course be changed to include additional modules that reflect the courses name of "Gender Studies" or that the course be renamed to "Womens Studies" to more accurately reflect the content of the course. Bring sources, studies, news articles to back up all of your claims.
/r/MensRights11/09/12 04:28 PM
10

I like the counter argument that if the men have to pay their wife a salary they should also have to preform well in regular performance reviews like the men do at their job. Honestly, this is a joke of a law that is sexist and one way, what happens if the wife makes more money? What if the amount of money brought into the household is so insignificant it's barely enough to buy food? What's the portion of the salary and what would constitute raising/lowering it?
/r/MensRights11/09/12 04:26 PM
3

Not that I agree that this is always relevant to the MRM but it's usually brought up because in major tournaments women have pushed for equal prize money/equal payment even though they play shorter games and not at the same level as the male players. Not that I 100% agree with this assessment, that's just how I've seen it presented before.
/r/MensRights11/09/12 01:29 PM
21

Aerik Posts: 34 Joined: Tue Aug 28, 2012 2:03 pm Location: **Edit to remove the location And actively advocating a hate group. And Excellent work ‘repressing his free speech’, Lord Setar! That JohnTheOther guy is a scumbag and the website you mentioned is indeed a cesspit of similarly repulsive people. Yea, I'm going to guess this is a SRS website and I would even go as far to say that it shouldn't be linked on this subreddit for falling a little to close to (as a website, not as an affiliated s…
/r/MensRights10/09/12 06:24 PM
4

We can't feel bad for men until we can push this number to 9/10ths IMO: The financial crisis has been especially unkind to men: three-quarters of the 7.5m American jobs lost in the recession belonged to men and were in traditionally masculine industries, such as construction, manufacturing and finance. /s if that's really needed.
/r/MensRights07/09/12 02:41 PM
3

I normally dislike aVfM but this article is a great satire of the style of research Mr.Bedry clearly uses.
/r/MensRights07/09/12 01:57 PM
2

What's the quote? Sorry, I'm in Canada and I'm unable to view the video.
/r/MensRights07/09/12 01:44 PM
21

I'm happy that the majority of the commenters are calling the article out for being false.
/r/MensRights06/09/12 08:55 PM
3

I can't really comment on the content of the site because it's very U.S. centric (not that that's an issue, I just don't have the political context) but you should look at some web design tutorials. The page is too busy and distracting, your user/reader will have a hard time consuming any information when theres that much text on your page.
/r/MensRights31/08/12 04:15 AM
3

Also, Breathalyzers usually only work about 20-50 times before needing to be re-calibrated or replaced.
/r/MensRights29/08/12 07:39 PM
2

I'm wary to respond because the bot hasn't show up yet...
/r/MensRights29/08/12 01:48 PM
0

She is the one in control of her reproductive system. So she has a right to seek an abortion because she's the one on control. Good thing we got this all sorted out!
/r/MensRights29/08/12 01:47 PM
3

I would assume it's this comment on a circumcision thread that began this whole issue. Hahahaha, you fuckers lose... Get them 'skins cut off fellas!
/r/MensRights27/08/12 07:59 PM
1

I'm sure some of AVfM's biggest fans would disagree.
/r/MensRights27/08/12 02:09 PM
1

I might be misunderstanding you but I would refute that AVfM had the scoop first AVfM date: August 16, 2012 Canada.com's date (Although I saw it elsewhere before this): August 14, 2012
/r/MensRights25/08/12 02:43 AM
5

At least 12 hours after this post went up, at which point it was already downvoted significantly.
/r/MensRights25/08/12 02:31 AM
8

I'm a regular in /MR and I agree with many of the commenters here for the reasons already stated.
/r/MensRights25/08/12 02:29 AM
2

They were drunk just 7 hours ago, the hangover may be preventing your answer.
/r/MensRights24/08/12 01:27 PM
3

I'm not sure if you've been paying attention but that Character has some major flaws, if you saw the last episode you'd see where this blog post comes from. It 100% fits the character and should be seen as an extension of the show, not as the opinion of the show writers.
/r/MensRights23/08/12 06:31 PM
1

http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/ypbpy/man_sues_gun_range_over_ladies_day_promotion/
/r/MensRights23/08/12 05:34 PM
1

http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/yozfh/man_sues_firing_range_over_ladies_day_promotion/
/r/MensRights23/08/12 05:34 PM
10

Listen Up, Ladies: Here’s Everything Real Men Think Is Wrong With You Lindy West I've been doing some scholarly research, and I noticed this thing that's been really dragging society down for the past few millennia: it's that everything is wrong with you. You are gross. First of all, your hair is gross, because it is not long and thick enough. But don't strap fake hair to your head! That's also gross! Also, what the fuck is up with your skin? It is so dry and scaly like a lizard (but not one of …
/r/MensRights23/08/12 04:28 PM
3

equalism
/r/MensRights22/08/12 06:58 PM
5

For those not wanting to give them pageviews: Uncircumcised Penises Might Be Costing Us Billions Lindy West Ever since people got all freaked out about cutting up babies' penises back in the '70s, the rate of male circumcision in America has steadily declined—dropping from 79% a few decades ago to our current 55%. And according to a new health study from Johns Hopkins University, all those intact ding-dongs flopping around our nation might constitute a significant drain on the health care system…
/r/MensRights22/08/12 03:13 PM
1

Uhh, You do know that Christina Hoff Sommers calls herself a feminist, right? equity feminist, but still a feminist.
/r/MensRights21/08/12 06:58 PM
16

Is Reddit’s Feminism subreddit run by MRAs? Oh, Reddit, where the demographics are so skewed that virtually every discussion amongst and/or about women ultimately gets taken over by dudes doing the old “what about the dudes” routine. It’s no secret that the TwoXChromosomes subreddit has long been overrun with MRAs and FeMRAs. And now it’s become pretty clear that the Feminism subreddit has gone MRA as well. If you want all the details of the drama, here’s a thread in the subreddit in which the f…
/r/MensRights21/08/12 02:24 PM
3

This is purely a political/Religious move, not one motivated by gender or gender ideology. I this comment in WorldNews explains it best imo: Russian here and had experience with our...khm...court and judicial system. That is a commercial organization which also is a cover up for government and it's deeds. It works either by the orders from top or if there are none, by the commercial interest they seek in cases. Some "funny" facts about recent things happening in Moscow: Pussy Riot are found guil…
/r/MensRights17/08/12 04:01 PM
2

I'm all for the get together and all but We will be petitioning the office of the Prime Minister of this country – my home and yours, Canada – to officially re-name the city in which this human rights work is being pursued, to the appropriate name reflecting this great work. Going forward, let nobody refer again to the obsolete nomenclature of a previous era, and from today onwards let this city be recognized by it’s true name – Mancouver. Really threw me for a loop.
/r/MensRights17/08/12 02:38 PM
3

Meet Edwin_Quine who's had similar issues as you with that same user.
/r/MensRights17/08/12 02:07 PM
1

I don't even know if they come to this subreddit honestly.
/r/MensRights16/08/12 06:14 PM
2

I live in Alberta, but not in Edmonton. I saw the pictures on this sub.
/r/MensRights16/08/12 02:17 PM
2

I saw pictures a couple days ago of posters with a strip detailing the edmontons MRM website covering the faces of the plays actors.
/r/MensRights16/08/12 01:40 PM
6

I think it's inappropriate to poster over other peoples posters during a fringe festival. Those people make their living off of their performances and instead of making a point in favour of the MRM it just makes us look petty. Why not flyer right next to the other posters? Why do you have to cover up the play bills?
/r/MensRights16/08/12 01:23 PM
3

I'm not sure many MRAs would want to give out that much information about where they live.
/r/MensRights16/08/12 01:22 PM
0

No meme's or rage comics.
/r/MensRights15/08/12 07:53 PM
6

It's modded by Viperz and it's a troll subreddit.
/r/MensRights15/08/12 05:25 PM
11

It's modded by Viperz and it's a troll subreddit.
/r/MensRights15/08/12 05:25 PM
3

Keep it in MensRightsMeta IMO.
/r/MensRights15/08/12 01:27 PM
8

To be fair, Ma99ie is a regular poster in /r/MensRights and a part of this community, whether they got here through SRD or not isn't of consequence unless this isn't a regular sub to see them in imo.
/r/MensRights13/08/12 02:02 PM
2

I don't think they're arguing that it's a good choice but rather that they're making the choice because of religious motivations over outright hatred of any gender.
/r/MensRights10/08/12 10:38 PM
5

I'm guessing this women-only city won't be self sufficient without outside help. Uhh... I don't think any city is self sufficient without outside help. I'm not sure why you're putting that metric onto this city.
/r/MensRights10/08/12 10:35 PM
1

Normally I would agree but since the NDP have never been the ruling federal party I'm not going to pre-judge any policies before I see them. Either way, Paul Dewar lost the vote and he didn't get in so the point is mostly moot.
/r/MensRights10/08/12 01:18 PM
1

My response to you was less of a response to you and more of an indicator to the mods as to why I reported you. I apologize if this caused you confusion.
/r/MensRights09/08/12 07:30 PM
1

As shown in the below thread this user is obviously nothing more than a troll and should be banned. http://www.reddit.com/r/antisrs/comments/xx0rp/srs_members_vandalize_wikipedia_xpost_from/c5qdxp8
/r/MensRights09/08/12 07:21 PM
1

http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/xtl0v/cracked_unhealthy_mentalities_the_internet_turned/
/r/MensRights08/08/12 01:46 PM
1

All this without citing a source, just the noise and ramblings of someone that doesn't know the Canadian political climate and is intent on forcing their jingoistic views on others.
/r/MensRights08/08/12 01:11 PM
-1

So I reply with a response of facts and you go on the attack? You know, I like some of the articles that are posted on the site but attitudes like this are really off putting. The way you're acting reminds me of most discussions I have with Feminists when I bring up suicide stats and wage stats.
/r/MensRights07/08/12 10:08 PM
1

Paul Dewar didn't win the leadership race and that plan never came to be. If anything that's a point against what you're attempting to prove as he didn't win the leadership race. He actually withdrew from the voting on the 2nd ballot after a poor showing of 7.5% on the first ballot. **Edit: He also vowed to launch a national inquiry into the high number of missing and murdered aboriginal women and promised to enforce the Canada Health Act to ensure women have access to abortion in every province…
/r/MensRights07/08/12 08:37 PM
0

I disagree and I'll cite their terms and conditions as to why I disagree: Created as an online extension of the American humor magazine founded in 1958, Cracked.com is one of the longest-running and fastest growing comedy brands online.
/r/MensRights07/08/12 06:53 PM
2

Maybe satire isn't the right word here. Either way this is a work of comedy and I can't really get worked up and mad about someones views on what's funny.
/r/MensRights07/08/12 02:27 PM
1

I would say that getting worked up on this work of satire would be as silly as people who got worked up about the whole Tosh.O thing.
/r/MensRights07/08/12 01:50 PM
4

heavily feminist, hippy, traditionally New Democratic Party (NDP) I'm an NDP'er and I still consider myself to be an MRA.
/r/MensRights07/08/12 03:46 AM
1

Not unless someone has a screenshot.
/r/MensRights07/08/12 03:44 AM
2

Man, I love that site. Whenever someone tells me that people with that much hate don't exist it's a real easy URL to recite to prove them wrong. Seriously though, they actually make me sick.
/r/MensRights03/08/12 12:52 AM
3

Only if you can choose to not answer and not have your 'non-vote' counted either way.
/r/MensRights03/08/12 12:37 AM
3

Gender-conformity: cis/trans/genderqueer/other But that might be offensive, I'm not actually sure.
/r/MensRights03/08/12 12:36 AM
1

I know, I just wanted to let you know why you might get people selecting "Other". I don't live in the US and I couldn't abstain even though it said "IF".
/r/MensRights02/08/12 08:27 PM
1

You say "If you live in the U.S" and it's required to finish the form so I had to select "Other".
/r/MensRights02/08/12 06:36 PM
1

If the courts ruled the existing laws unconstitutional once wouldn't they just do it again with the new laws?
/r/MensRights02/08/12 01:44 PM
2

"I don't want someone modifying my penis without my consent!" (actual comment): If you could put your privilege aside for even one second, you would see how offensive this is. Wow, Not wanting my genitals to be mutilated shows off my privilege now?
/r/MensRights02/08/12 01:41 PM
1

What is sexual blackmail? I honestly have no clue and I can't find a definition quick. I just assumed it was blackmail but with intent to receive sexual favours.
/r/MensRights02/08/12 12:52 AM
3

This law is an expansion of the already standing sexual harassment laws. This is actually false, if you click on my provided link you will see: Its passage comes more than two months after a court struck down the previous statute, saying it was too vague and failed to protect women. Also from that article it does sound non-gendered in the eyes of the law and the gendering is coming from the reporters/bloggers. I won't believe that this law only applies to support women until I actually see the l…
/r/MensRights01/08/12 08:51 PM
3

Eh... The culture in France is very different than it is in America. I would also like to see the actual wording on the law before I would pass judgment on it. The legislation covers offences in universities, the housing market and job interviews. Single acts of sexual blackmail will be considered sexual harassment, whereas previously only repeated acts were. The way I'm reading that is it has to be in one of those areas, but like I said - without the actual law in front of me it's hard to tell …
/r/MensRights01/08/12 08:36 PM
10

They even locked the thread after people came in attempting to help him. Tie all of this in to a majority of these posts coming from Australia and this has disingenuous written all over it. Given the evidence here there's no way the OP even exists. Nothing more than a ploy for these guys to generate publicity and attention to their "cause". So when I'm operating my forums if I see a lot of users from the U.S I will assume that they're all the same user and lock the thread... I would also like to…
/r/MensRights01/08/12 04:54 PM
7

I'm not sure I understand the downvotes on this article. I don't think this user is trying to espouse these views, they're trying to shine a light on this writers inability to see past their preconceived notions.
/r/MensRights01/08/12 03:54 PM
-5

Fair distinction. I'm more going on how it's perceived by the redditors but the distinction exists.
/r/MensRights01/08/12 04:47 AM
3

I think that's a good thing. If someone sees a poster that's been defaced and actually checks out the sources/information and finds it reasonable the defacement proves the posters point.
/r/MensRights31/07/12 03:20 PM
4

I'm in for this, I checked out the ad and I really like it! How can I help?
/r/MensRights31/07/12 01:48 PM
2

I'm not going to bother to open the link but since it's facebook I'm sure the below applies. Stupid people say stupid things, individuals being stupid isn't really an issue for the MRM unless they're being supported by a large group or have a large following.
/r/MensRights31/07/12 01:30 PM
10

It's a beer/steak sauce/chips/condom aisle. The only issue I really have with it is that they're marketing it as "the man aisle".
/r/MensRights26/07/12 06:56 PM
8

Without any proof I have a hard time believing this. Please show me the SRS thread pointing to that thread.
/r/MensRights26/07/12 03:11 AM
0

I think I fundamentally disagree on a couple definitions and that's why our views don't align. I'll be happy to just disagree as I have read your opinion on this topic before in other threads and I doubt anything I could say would sway your opinions or anything you could say would sway mine.
/r/MensRights26/07/12 01:29 AM
2

I don't agree with this so it must be outside influence? I frequent this sub and I upvoted this thread. A lot of commenters here supporting the thread post in this sub often. Are we no longer MRAs because we upvoted this thread?
/r/MensRights26/07/12 01:20 AM
7

1,327 points (73% like it) 2,074 up votes 747 down votes So if you upvoted that thread (as 2,074 people have) you're a concern troll?
/r/MensRights26/07/12 01:07 AM
0

Yes. I actively support Mens Rights Activism in my local community and I don't agree with this. Are you generalizing all 41,000 of us or are you telling me I'm not an MRA?
/r/MensRights26/07/12 01:04 AM
6

From the comments: In terms of Intimate Partner Violence it is pretty much equal in Canada according to Stats Can: A similar proportion of men and women reported experiencing spousal violence during the five years prior to the survey. Among men, 6.0% or about 585,000, encountered spousal violence during this period, compared with 6.4% or 601,000 women. The Daily summary: http://www.statcan.gc.ca/daily-quotidien/110127/dq110127a-eng.htm
/r/MensRights26/07/12 12:59 AM
2

The party, which was initially founded by a group of men, does not exclude women. In fact up to 40 per cent of its Vorarlberg members are female. We’re not just about men’s rights – we stand for human rights," said Hausbichler. Sounds like a good party to me! I wouldn't mind taking a look at the full platform when it comes out if you see it.
/r/MensRights26/07/12 12:55 AM
2

I prefer my drama over in SubredditDrama and ThePopcornStand. Even if they did troll us (which they did) I don't think we should really draw attention to this. If everyone they trolled posted a thread then every subreddit would have this topic.
/r/MensRights25/07/12 08:30 PM
0

I'm not a big fan of AVfM but I do like seeing people in my Province going out and making their voice heard. **Edit: there/their
/r/MensRights25/07/12 08:16 PM
1

Looking at the upvote/downvote ratio it looks like the majority of the readers not only read but also agree with the OP.
/r/MensRights25/07/12 06:08 PM
3

Or that your recent post is surrounded by facebook pictures and non-issues to the point where your post is skimmed over due to it's company.
/r/MensRights25/07/12 06:06 PM
6

I regularly downvote those threads, if you don't want to see them I suggest you do the same. If no one downvotes what they think is inappropriate then of course they'll continue to be posted. Be the change you want to see in the sub, contribute, vote, comment.
/r/MensRights25/07/12 02:23 PM
5

This thread that has 15 comments? This thread that has a total of 39 votes (+12) out of 41,143 subs? How is this thread indicating how the sub is as a whole?
/r/MensRights25/07/12 02:14 PM
9

So they're taking issue that Canadian Police are enforcing the law in a gender neutral way? I think that's great!
/r/MensRights25/07/12 01:59 PM
2

They deleted the comment after being called out on it in their SRD submission.
/r/MensRights25/07/12 02:18 AM
3

I'm pretty sure that thread (and it's accompanying SRD thread thanks to qwestioneverything) has been deleted. **Edit: antiLogical (3 day old account) reposted the SRD thread. I assume this is qwestioneverything's alt although I could be wrong.
/r/MensRights24/07/12 08:49 PM
9

Contrast this with hardly any reported cases of sexual violence against men. Maybe because according to your laws it can't happen? Why report something that will get you shunned in your own community if you know you will receive zero support?
/r/MensRights24/07/12 01:53 PM
1

I thought it was the term "shemale", but now I also see the pedophile one as well.
/r/MensRights24/07/12 01:50 PM
1

What a self fulfilling prophecy you have going there.
/r/MensRights24/07/12 01:42 PM
1

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Be_bold http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Identifying_reliable_sources Be the change you want to be in Wikipedia, if you don't think enough scrutiny is being done against other articles you should make the proper changes and not just complain about it like a child.
/r/MensRights24/07/12 03:17 AM
6

Men Going Their Own Way. Basically removing ones self from the dating pool and saying that they will not have any intimate relationship with women. They will continue to interact with women and be friends with women but they won't enter a relationship with one until the social concerns which 'pushed' them to this are resolved. I'm sure other definitions exist and some people will disagree with mine and I'm open to input as I don't follow this belief myself.
/r/MensRights23/07/12 06:09 PM
2

There are countless such sites, all very similar. Beyond that, there were two books out contemporary to my research: one from a female journalist and the other by the British man. Just like the contributors to this article, I found too little "meat" -- no centralized organizational structure- and so no strong voice. I interviewed a couple of attorneys, local to me, and was given the impression that the many such organizations have neither the time nor the funding to organize-- instead attempt to…
/r/MensRights23/07/12 01:57 PM
2

Can you copy the text of the article for those of us without and unwilling to make an account?
/r/MensRights23/07/12 01:52 PM
9

Most of us have been banned from that sub. Don't go to that sub.
/r/MensRights13/07/12 05:07 PM
1

I suck at Reddit search but if you search the sub /r/mensrightslinks you'll most likely find some.
/r/MensRights13/07/12 03:43 PM
7

Just to add: By Tracy Moore Jun 13, 2012 6:30 PM
/r/MensRights11/07/12 02:16 PM
2

I like that if someone wrote the line Sometimes I just want to watch girls with big boobs dance pretty. in any article ever they would decry it as being the most sexist thing a reviewer could write while they ink Sometimes I just want to watch guys with way too many abs dance pretty. I personally don't care about the movie, if people like it they should watch it. But for someone who preaches feminism they should be under scrutiny for when they don't follow what they preach.
/r/MensRights10/07/12 02:13 PM
5

I agree that this is outrageous but I'm not sure how this is something of note to the MRM, I don't personally believe that the outcome would of been different if the genders were reversed.
/r/MensRights09/07/12 07:55 PM
1

edit: lol some loser is downvoting me. It's an alt, moron. I don't care. I know I downvoted you so your comment would be hidden so the majority of casual readers won't have to see your comments, not to effect your karma.
/r/MensRights09/07/12 05:58 PM
2

Political parties change often, I see no issues with changing their name to be more inclusive if there is no major protest by the majority of the members.
/r/MensRights09/07/12 01:45 PM
3

I'd assume it's the same as /r/mens_rights and is a troll subreddit until I see otherwise.
/r/MensRights06/07/12 05:42 PM
4

What if the man is Jewish? . An alternative ritual, sometimes referred to as a naming ceremony or “bris shalom,” may or may not be led by a rabbi. It has all the joy of the traditional ritual without the pain of the circumcision. Some Jews may question alternative rituals, but according to Rabbi Eugene Cohen, 80 percent of American Jewish circumcisions already do not meet ritual standards. Because the surgical procedure alone does not fulfill the religious requirement, and since many sons of Jew…
/r/MensRights06/07/12 02:57 PM
2

Drop your fucking ego already. We have a world to save. Sounds like you're the one with the ego. Tell me how the Nazis, a political party with a clear hierarchical structure who's main purpose when in power was to invade countries by force and take any person who is of a religion or group they dislike and kill them on a massive scale is like feminism. The burden of proof to prove the statement is yours since you brought the argument up, it's not my burden to prove that they're not alike.
/r/MensRights05/07/12 08:26 PM
3

I'm really enjoying that thread, thank you for posting it and letting us know about it!
/r/MensRights05/07/12 05:04 PM
0

Earning scorn from bigoted feminists Not all feminists are bigoted.
/r/MensRights05/07/12 04:36 PM
2

the fact that they haven't killed anyone as a group while the nazis have done mass killings. This whole conversation is fairly offensive.
/r/MensRights05/07/12 03:54 PM
1

How many feminists have marched the streets pulling men from houses and shoot them on the spot?
/r/MensRights05/07/12 01:10 PM
2

comparing a group that we disagree with on many issues with a group that committed genocide and you don't see how that's intellectually lazy? If you're unwilling to support the argument and just compare a group to nazis then you're unable to form a strong argument and will only push people away from the MRM. I know that I don't want to associate myself with you or klonozopanour and statements like this make it hard for me to defend and support the MRM.
/r/MensRights05/07/12 01:09 PM
5

This is just hateful and intellectually lazy.
/r/MensRights04/07/12 08:36 PM
17

unless you remove my right to vote. Why would your right to vote be removed?
/r/MensRights04/07/12 08:35 PM
1

Where did he say this sorry? I took a quick look through the thread and didn't find anything.
/r/MensRights04/07/12 08:34 PM
5

I would assume because they could get better paying jobs. Most internships offer poor pay, poor work life balance, and poor benefits, these are the things that women usually prioritize when choosing a job.
/r/MensRights04/07/12 07:05 PM
62

Some in the MRM are anti-feminist but I don't know any who are anti-womens rights. I'm just going to let you know that you're going to get push back on any proposals that some of the more vocal anti-feminists see as "giving an inch".
/r/MensRights04/07/12 04:57 PM
4

I like how they haven't updated it showing that he made offers to women who rejected those offers. we made offers to female candidates & they chose other opportunities for various reasons. We continue to make offers; a priority.
/r/MensRights04/07/12 04:53 PM
3

How many male writers does your beloved jezebel have? Actually, I think they have 2 or 3. I know Hugo Schwyzer (although a scum bag) writes for them. **Edit: Jon Bois makes 2 that I've seen.
/r/MensRights04/07/12 04:35 PM
3

I believe they're referring to the U.K which would be 18 or 28 years but I could be wrong.
/r/MensRights29/06/12 08:51 PM
3

Can you add NSFW tag on that image hosting site link? The ads can get someone fired.
/r/MensRights29/06/12 02:26 PM
6

There's a reason why America is greater than Canada and all of Europe. Careful, I know I would disagree with that statement and I'm sure others would too. Why cause unneeded infighting just for your own sense of jingoism?
/r/MensRights28/06/12 03:49 PM
11

So.... As a Canadian I don't understand this issue as much, I'm 100% for socialized healthcare so I'm not sure why universal healthcare in the states is contentious here. I don't doubt that there are valid reasons, just curious as to what they are. **Edit: Instead of posting individual thank you's to my responders I'll put it here. Thank you for the clear and concise answers!
/r/MensRights28/06/12 02:36 PM
8

Downvote what you don't think is appropriate, I do.
/r/MensRights22/06/12 04:57 PM
4

This sorta stuff should probably be kept in ASRS.
/r/MensRights21/06/12 01:49 PM
4

For those of you (who are like me) that hate watching youtube if you could read it for yourself here's the links to the data he references. DNA tests eliminated between 8 and 15% of convicted offenders and supported exoneration. 46% were indeterminate Only 6% of rape accusations lead to conviction I don't have a chance to read through the linked items at the moment so I can't comment on their validity.
/r/MensRights20/06/12 08:43 PM
5

Mostly just Aerik, he's the one doing the majority of the posts to AMR.
/r/MensRights20/06/12 01:14 PM
3

http://www.thecomedynetwork.ca/Shows/Tosh I'm not sure if that link works outside of Canada. I'm also not sure if that specific episode is up.
/r/MensRights14/06/12 01:20 PM
1

I'm not as pessimistic as you are.
/r/MensRights13/06/12 03:09 PM
2

They stated to the media that they apologized because of their wives; the men have their wives ear and not because of the fathers themselves.
/r/MensRights13/06/12 02:06 PM
1

18 up votes 3 down votes Is not becoming popular
/r/MensRights13/06/12 02:00 PM
1

True, but it's not as wide spread as it is in the U.S.
/r/MensRights13/06/12 01:36 PM
10

Canada has paternity leave and at least one men's centre (Another one coming!)... So we have that?
/r/MensRights12/06/12 05:03 PM
1

I've supported the NDP in the past several elections. I'm not 100% sure what you're asking sorry.
/r/MensRights08/06/12 12:57 PM
6

Wow, really inappropriate, you should edit that comment.
/r/MensRights07/06/12 04:30 PM
9

If you're hoping on MRA comments you should know that SRSMeta also linked to that article so any view that isn't in the SRS mindset would get berated and buried under a tonne of SRS comments quickly.
/r/MensRights07/06/12 03:19 PM
3

I'm a socialist who supports the NDP in Canada.
/r/MensRights07/06/12 02:14 PM
2

You should let Ig know here: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRightsMeta/comments/ummcn/what_are_some_frequently_asked_questions/
/r/MensRights06/06/12 05:34 PM
1

In the original thread I'm pretty sure the OP posted a fixed version without the "LOL" text and with the graphs changed.
/r/MensRights06/06/12 02:06 PM
3

Removing young girls breast buds also reduces the risk of breast cancer! We should start doing that too! /s
/r/MensRights05/06/12 08:54 PM
2

Ignore SRS?
/r/MensRights31/05/12 02:47 PM
0

obesity is apparently a sign of self-control Or a medical condition or even genetics.
/r/MensRights30/05/12 08:37 PM
1

What's defamatory in this article? It only mentions her husband once to provide context: Schweigert said the ceremony was a celebration of how far she'd come since her painful divorce six years ago that led to her two children to decide to live with her ex-husband. And her reasoning although odd doesn't seem to be detrimental to anyone: "I was waiting for someone to come along and make me happy," Schweigert told Inforum. "At some point, a friend said, 'Why do you need someone to marry you to be …
/r/MensRights30/05/12 07:42 PM
3

I'm not sure that this is an issue for the MRM if an issue at all really... I would say that it seems like a waste of her personal money but that's about it.
/r/MensRights30/05/12 07:24 PM
4

I have the same questions one of the commenter's has: What are the degrees in ? Which colleges are we discussing? What is the population of males and females?
/r/MensRights30/05/12 06:38 PM
1

Meme/Rage Comics: There are subreddits devoted specifically to these things, and such content belongs there. If you have a point to make or a story to tell, make a self-post. It is not the content so much as the format that is the problem, where many subreddits are starting to treat these submissions as spam.
/r/MensRights30/05/12 03:23 PM
1

If you're referring to MachShot's comment then you should link directly to his comment. The article itself doesn't espouse this view.
/r/MensRights28/05/12 08:38 PM
1

... it is difficult or impossible to tell the difference between sincere extremism and an exaggerated parody of extremism.
/r/MensRights28/05/12 02:10 PM
3

25 minutes old so I'll assume you're a troll. Also very U.S centric with no cited sources... I don't even understand what you're attempting to say honestly. Why are Senators paying people? Do you mean their staff? Can you cite their wages along with their jobs and hours worked?
/r/MensRights24/05/12 07:43 PM
5

Eric was already giving her $411,000 per year as child-support payments for their three kids Apparently this wasn't enough so she had to sue? Wow...
/r/MensRights24/05/12 06:06 PM
1

Where does it say the funding was approved?
/r/MensRights23/05/12 07:23 PM
2

Started in the 90s - In 2005 marriage was redefined as "the lawful union of two persons to the exclusion of all others." at a federal level.
/r/MensRights23/05/12 04:38 PM
5

I'm from Canada so my views are a little more liberal than the most of the American users here but I'm pro-gay rights and pro-gay marriage.
/r/MensRights23/05/12 02:06 PM
5

Ignore SRS, almost all of us are banned and it's nothing new.
/r/MensRights23/05/12 03:34 AM
2

Thanks Matt and Martial for the great replies :)
/r/MensRights23/05/12 02:05 AM
1

They're the perpetrators in that news article which isn't this sub, I fail to see your point.
/r/MensRights23/05/12 02:01 AM
1

Can you cite a case where this has happened? Can you cite any comparable case where a man has done this with any other bodily fluid and received longer?
/r/MensRights23/05/12 01:57 AM
5

As a non-American how does this discriminate against men? They note that they're for it to get rid of organizations retaliating against their employees for sharing their salary amount with other employees which seems like a good thing to me. I'm sure there may be more to this law that makes it discriminatory against men but this article doesn't provide anything showing that.
/r/MensRights22/05/12 08:23 PM
3

Gross but I'm not sure how this is an MRM issue. The person is disturbed but I don't see anything indicating that they're being treated any different than the courts in any similar situation. Are we going to complain whenever someone breaks the law now? Or are we only doing it when it's a women breaking the law?
/r/MensRights22/05/12 08:18 PM
5

As horrible as this is, I'm not sure posting every article that has a woman involved is notable in the MRM.
/r/MensRights22/05/12 06:01 PM
3

The difference is that the Traditionalist MRAs want gender standards while the Moderate MRAs want no gender standards.
/r/MensRights22/05/12 04:33 PM
5

A lot of the responses echo this statement. The post you put up was across Jezebel and Kotaku which probably explains this, if you look at the normal Jezebel commenters on his reply they all go on about how he doesn't understand his privilege which is sad.
/r/MensRights18/05/12 05:24 PM
2

I would just like to point out that some things that have been deleted have been reasonable. I would point to the Female Privilege page, I think that the page should exist and that female privilege exists but the page that was deleted was offensive and had no sources.
/r/MensRights18/05/12 05:22 PM
10

Not a stared commenter but currently the "hottest" comment (most replies): Um. What? No. Today, I crawled out of bed at noon, moaning in agony. I suffer from an illness that results in, among other things, chronic pain and fatigue. My entire life, for the past half-decade or so, has been defined by my illness. I have had doctors tell me that it's a miracle I made it out of bed to get in to see them for an appointment. One told me that I was the sickest patient she's ever seen. My family has gone…
/r/MensRights18/05/12 04:59 PM
4

A Straight White Male: The Lowest Difficulty Setting There Is post, I'm not going to bother to copy paste the horrible text (which I would normally do on a Jezebel article). I would just suggest that no one go the the link as it provides ad revenue to Jezebel.
/r/MensRights18/05/12 04:57 PM
3

This. I don't have any issues with moderate feminists other than they don't fight against the sexism that spews from the radical feminists. To be fair though, we have our own share of 'radicals' in the MRM and I think we all have to work towards pointing out that the mainstream doesn't support the radical fringe.
/r/MensRights18/05/12 02:19 PM
0

Isn't their a place where you can approach reddit admins and request a subreddit that's already claimed if it's not being used?
/r/MensRights18/05/12 02:17 PM
2

That's what their linked post said. Either follow the links provided or don't respond when you don't know what's being talked about.
/r/MensRights17/05/12 01:30 PM
3

Back in the good old days men had the right to take any woman they wanted and do all the things they won't let me do to them. How can we get women back in the cave where they belong? We're losing all of our rights! Bye bye troll.
/r/MensRights16/05/12 08:16 PM
3

I'm not sure how that video proves how no feminists can be MRAs.
/r/MensRights16/05/12 07:55 PM
1

I was just using Demonspawn as an example. I meant it more as the vocal users who outside of this subreddit are antagonistic.
/r/MensRights16/05/12 02:01 PM
1

I see it too, I find it helps to take a week away from reddit once and a while to cool off.
/r/MensRights15/05/12 08:24 PM
3

I get that but I have a feeling that any additional subreddit would become heavily biased towards one side and exclude the opposing side. I'm not sure on what would be the perfect solution, I'm just attempting to identify some of the underlying causes so others can attempt in finding a resolution these ideological feuds.
/r/MensRights15/05/12 08:00 PM
4

A new subreddit to garner public opinion? I don't think that's necessary, we just have to be better as a whole in providing links to the studies we cite (I'm often bad at this too). A lot of the hate for us comes from (imo) when we state something that we know is a fact because we've seen it a million times on /r/MensRights but it's not common knowledge outside of our circles. We shouldn't take the disagreement as an attack, but as a chance to inform and educate.
/r/MensRights15/05/12 07:52 PM
11

I like the idea of separating them by skill but I could also see the outrage when one gender is consistently in the "Better" or "Worse" skill category.
/r/MensRights15/05/12 07:30 PM
0

It was a false equivalence to assume we should get as much clout as a social movement which began way before ours. I understand that to the public there is a huge difference and that this would be a false equivalence but on Reddit where the majority of users most likely know specific MRAs and discredit the whole MRM based off their comments I don't think it's as much of a false equivalence. The Internet is a great equalizer of voice and opinion.
/r/MensRights15/05/12 07:22 PM
3

I personally attempt to figure out if I'm talking to someone who's reasonable or if they refuse to have an adult discussion. If the user is reasonable I'm more than happy to discuss my views in a polite way, while doing this I've never been asked to leave /feminism /twoX or /askFeminists. I have found some users who tend to not care for any arguments that may be presented but I'm always able to find enough resources in /r/MensRightsLinks to get my point across to at least the casual readers in t…
/r/MensRights15/05/12 07:17 PM
1

I'm not saying that people who hold sexist views against men don't exist within the Feminist movement but to hold feminism to that standard and fail to realize that the MRM has hateful people is an odd stance to take in my mind. I'm also not saying that we shouldn't fight against these views or that we shouldn't confront feminists who espouse them, I'm attempting to say that just like we're not all like JerimiahMRA or Demonspawn not all feminists are like Comins or Dworkin.
/r/MensRights15/05/12 05:16 PM
17

I think the issue is that some in the MRM and Feminism are unable to differentiate in between the Radical/Traditional elements from the more egalitarian elements of either ideology. This seems to make even the most moderate posters angry with eachother when they most likely share the same views on a majority of subjects but their inability to ignore labels prevents them from moving forward.
/r/MensRights15/05/12 02:35 PM
3

some more discussion on this article: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/tmzh7/frightening_response_to_assault_victims_call_for/
/r/MensRights15/05/12 05:29 AM
3

http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRightsLinks **Edit: Just providing a starting point, don't have a chance to look for specific links at the moment.
/r/MensRights14/05/12 05:15 AM
3

As to the "we" part of your concern post, I don't know who you might be referring to. The subscribers of this subreddit.
/r/MensRights13/05/12 05:41 AM
19

This is true but his personal life is not. Agent Orange is already in, as is at least one other. Further word is coming. This makes me think that we may see additional things coming into public domain such as his place of work or where he lives, this is what makes me uneasy.
/r/MensRights13/05/12 05:14 AM
33

I don't think we should be siding with doxxing.
/r/MensRights13/05/12 05:04 AM
1

Sorry, we can't find the page you requested. You missed the 'l' in html http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/story/2012/05/10/f-mothers-day.html
/r/MensRights11/05/12 03:13 PM
38

Comments like this one is a stark contrast of the one above. It's a private institution, not supported by tax-payer money. If they want to enroll only red- promoted by schwestie headed Japanese bocce players I would not be bothered. **Edit to add this quote Deep Springs is a private institution and is more than within their rights to exclude women. We laud women's colleges around here, I'm a proud alum of one, and we should extend the same courtesy to men's schools. If they ultimately decide to …
/r/MensRights11/05/12 02:57 PM
59

Comments like this one really bother me. I'm sort of surprised at how many people just subscribe to the, "well, there are all women's schools, so having all male schools is the same thing" argument. There are two kinds of double standards - the problematic ones in which two sets of standards are applied to different groups for an arbitrary reason, and then there are the double standards that exist because, well, there are two different standards. How I read it: "Double standards are alright if i…
/r/MensRights11/05/12 02:54 PM
18

Don't link to Jezebel, please post the text in a quote here.
/r/MensRights11/05/12 02:51 PM
14

Women’s Colleges Promote Sweatpants & Poor Tampon Hygiene, Says Wesleyan Student As a graduate of Wellesley College, I thought going to a women's college was about receiving an excellent education at an institution that's mission is to promote gender equality. Now a Wesleyan undergrad has opened my eyes to the horrors of single-sex education. How could I have failed to notice my fellow students "almost literally screaming 'Death to the Patriarchy!' all day, every day," and the "bloody tampons st…
/r/MensRights11/05/12 02:50 PM
19

Trustees of All-Male College Want to Keep Tradition of No Girls Allowed For 95 years, Deep Springs College, perhaps the most exclusive institute of higher education in the country — only around 26 undergraduates attend the two-year school, and most go on to Ivy League universities afterwards — has only accepted men into its rigorous program which includes not only a liberal arts education but hard labor such as milking cows and tilling the land. Last September, the school's trustees voted to cha…
/r/MensRights11/05/12 02:49 PM
2

I don't want us to be accused of raiding /AskFeminists... I agree with the sentiment of OThomson but linking it here seems like an excuse for people who disagree to shut out any comments they disagree with.
/r/MensRights11/05/12 01:50 PM
2

Man, American politics is really weird.
/r/MensRights10/05/12 07:49 PM
2

Crazy people do crazy things? Police believe neither father nor son knew they were carrying the weapon and, in a statement, a spokesperson said they "believe this was related to an ongoing domestic dispute." Police believe the wife was trying to cause trouble for her husband. The man never encountered any issues by this (except for a couple passengers but I suspect their reaction would be the same if it was a woman) and most likely it'll help any upcoming court cases if it's found that it was in…
/r/MensRights09/05/12 08:37 PM
25

It's SRS, ignore them.
/r/MensRights09/05/12 07:48 PM
1

I've seen articles with quotes from women who suffered from FGM saying almost the exactly the same thing as this.
/r/MensRights09/05/12 06:39 PM
1

If you want to be specific the 'Male circumcision' subtopic is under 'Male Genitals' topic which is a child of the 'Male Genital Mutilation' page. Genital modification and mutilation > 7. Male genitals > 7.1. Male circumcision
/r/MensRights09/05/12 06:38 PM
3

Depends on the school and how serious their tennis team is. I know that in my secondary school our track team met every single day for an hour and a half after school, I can see one of the coaches not wanting to do anything after that.
/r/MensRights09/05/12 05:46 PM
1

I say that we should never link to his blog or talk about him, why give him the pageviews and the attention he seeks? Ignore him, ignore his fans, ignore his site and you'll lead a happier life.
/r/MensRights09/05/12 02:14 PM
8

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Male_genital_mutilation#Male_circumcision Circumcision has it's own article because it's a large article, the parent is male genital mutilation. **Edit to say that this is NSFW and contains graphic images of Male Genital Mutilation (not just of the Circumcision brand but of things like bifurcation).
/r/MensRights09/05/12 04:56 AM
1

Someone needs to watch the video attached to the article.
/r/MensRights04/05/12 06:15 PM
5

Clearly-Dulai is unconvinced that a Men's Centre is necessary. She doesn't argue that men are never victimized or marginalized, whether the cause be racism, poverty or sexual identity. But she's sees no indication, yet, that helping such men will be the primary purpose of SFU's Men's Centre. They're still exploring the mandate of the Mens Centre and she's already attacking their purpose, how intellectually dishonest can you get to push your own personal agenda?
/r/MensRights04/05/12 04:43 PM
5

SFSS president Jeff McCann said the purpose of the Men's Centre is not specifically about gender equality, but rather to build a support structure and community for men who've come to SFU from out of town and are having a difficult time finding ways to get involved on campus. It is still about gender equality but it's also about supporting men... How can the local feminist groups protest this while still claiming the moral high ground? Those groups disgust me. "The next step is to start planning…
/r/MensRights04/05/12 04:37 PM
0

Clicked the first, last, and a random link to find comments from 9 months ago... I think the community has changed (+10,000 or more users) since then.
/r/MensRights02/05/12 06:07 PM
2

Original near the bottom. It was a part of a photoshoot/filming.
/r/MensRights02/05/12 05:29 PM
4

I liked this comment on the article by a stared commenter: crocuta: Seriously, this is one of the instances where I think MRAs actually have a point- violence perpetrated against men by women is treated as a joke instead of a crime. The fact that a feminist-leaning-ish website is perpetuating this attitude is especially disgusting.
/r/MensRights30/04/12 03:28 AM
4

Please don't link, copy-paste the text. Woman Dentist Gets Back at Ex-Boyfriend By Pulling Out All His Teeth By Cassie Murdoch If you'd just broken up with a dentist, you probably wouldn't go back to her office for help with a toothache a few days later—what with all the sharp objects and opportunities for inflicting pain. And yet, for some reason, that is exactly what Marek Olszewski of Poland did. But rather than get revenge by just being a little extra jabby with the novocaine needle, his ex-…
/r/MensRights30/04/12 03:26 AM
3

I know there is precedent for this in the U.S but I haven't seen anything like that in Canada.
/r/MensRights27/04/12 03:19 PM
3

Because yours are not sourced from any study that means yours are biased.
/r/MensRights20/04/12 05:15 PM
3

Troll: Downvote, report, move on
/r/MensRights20/04/12 05:04 PM
3

They're all legal and academic studies, I also believe most are peer reviewed. If you're refusing actual studies because of the subreddit they're on then it's prefectly alright for us to assume all of your stats are made up because not only are they not cited but it comes from an article named "The Nature of Male Violence - Patriarchal Tyranny" from a blog called "The New Era of Feminism".
/r/MensRights20/04/12 05:03 PM
3

That is an uncited blog post, what academic/legal studies are being referenced? You can check out /r/MensRightsLinks/ for some actual studies, one of the first ones I noticed on this issue states: Almost 24% of all relationships had some violence, and half (49.7%) of those were reciprocally violent. In nonreciprocally violent relationships, women were the perpetrators in more than 70% of the cases. Emphasis mine.
/r/MensRights20/04/12 04:59 PM
3

When you pay $10 (minimum) to use a forum on the Internet you have to justify the waste of money somehow. It's nice to have our own set of trolls isn't it?
/r/MensRights20/04/12 02:51 PM
3

The SPLC is under Jew control. A member of SRS called littletiger, a Jew, boasted about it. With Jews blood is thicker than water. If one Jew tells another what to do and they will do it, even if it's wrong. They have absolutely no moral fabric to act in accordance with if you're not one of them. A little fear and panic about this is absolutely warranted. Thats something you posted, I'm pretty sure you're the troll here.
/r/MensRights19/04/12 02:00 PM
11

I think it's a troll trolling for fun trying to make more hate (if there could be more hate) in between this sub and SRS/Radfem/Various Users (not saying they're affiliated with eachother).
/r/MensRights13/04/12 06:31 PM
4

7 day old throw away.
/r/MensRights13/04/12 02:09 AM
1

I don't think you're a troll, I agree with your statement above wholeheartedly.
/r/MensRights05/04/12 01:02 PM
3

What? are you saying Tucker Max isn't an asshole? Maybe we're just misunderstanding each other but I agree that Tucker Max is a horrible person, I was just letting the user know that SA was linking to him.
/r/MensRights04/04/12 08:54 PM
3

I respectfully disagree.
/r/MensRights04/04/12 08:52 PM
4

"An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind."
/r/MensRights04/04/12 08:48 PM
5

I'm also not a big fan of that. I would be happy enough if they ignored us so we could ignore them.
/r/MensRights04/04/12 08:40 PM
1

I think users should be privy to the fact that they're being talked about so they can defend themselves if they want to. I only really noticed because I was following that thread since I'm mentioned in.
/r/MensRights04/04/12 08:32 PM
5

I've never been to that subreddit (seen screenshots of it when it fist became a thing) and I've never received any messages indicating that I've been banned from it.
/r/MensRights04/04/12 08:06 PM
6

SquadronROE linked to you on SA. Hi SomethingAweful!
/r/MensRights04/04/12 08:01 PM
8

Saying that men are the superior sex, sexism is a bannable offense.
/r/MensRights04/04/12 07:54 PM
6

Dowvoted and reported.
/r/MensRights04/04/12 07:35 PM
4

Wow, I rarely agree with you but here I'm 100% behind you.
/r/MensRights04/04/12 07:05 PM
2

their founder has a notorious reputation for being a racist I don't want to be "that guy" but I'm actually curious as to the source of this.
/r/MensRights04/04/12 06:58 PM
5

From my comment in that 2X thread: From MR (I only post this because I find it interesting that /mr has the same opinion on Planned Parenthood rejecting the money as the majority of the feminist blogs I read): To give a semblance of being fair, Tucker Max does make many, many sexist comments. That's not really what Men's Rights is about. The MRM is about fairness and equality, and those comments aren't exactly helpful. Like this one: "In South Florida. This place is awful. Shitty design, slutty …
/r/MensRights04/04/12 06:55 PM
4

3% is still more often then deaths in traffic accidents which is considered common enough of a problem to warrant schools, laws, and preventative measures to be put in place.
/r/MensRights04/04/12 04:40 PM
10

Hear, hear! If feminists really think they can help fix many of the big problems that men and boys face in society today, they need to let go of these old long outdated social theories, and actually attempt to interact with MRAs and others out there that really are fighting for the betterment of men, in a way that doesn’t involve petty arguments or insults. They wonder why MRAs are so anti-feminist, (not anti-women to be clear, as far as everything I have seen – save a few fringe voices) maybe t…
/r/MensRights02/04/12 08:58 PM
0

Also to be fair the Female Privilege Page was also unsourced except for original research which is against Wiki rules. It was stated in the deletion if a proper article could be created with proper sources that they would re-open the article.
/r/MensRights02/04/12 08:28 PM
1

I think the distinction is that Feminism works toward removing those gender roles for women (even if they say they're working towards it for men I would say that this is false and that they think they are because feminists normally believe that removing them for women will remove them for men as well) while we have to work to remove them for men. I'm not saying that anyone who does what you outline are correct, just that they do it because it's socially acceptable.
/r/MensRights02/04/12 06:55 PM
3

Thank you for making this!
/r/MensRights02/04/12 05:24 PM
3

that person sure is sexist and racist... not sure how this is a MRM issue though.
/r/MensRights02/04/12 02:50 PM
1

Submit a AfD! I think this is what you'll need to know, looks like people have been requesting that it be deleted since 2008 so you'll have enough consensus to bring it to deletion.
/r/MensRights02/04/12 02:01 PM
2

Try posting here: /r/MensRightsMeta
/r/MensRights02/04/12 05:28 AM
1

Social conditioning, A man that's seen as weak is disposable.
/r/MensRights31/03/12 05:54 AM
3

Yea, I don't think it does either but I just wanted it up just in case the intent of the rule is to remove all comics. I didn't want the OP to get a surprise.
/r/MensRights30/03/12 08:48 PM
-12

I'm not sure if it's just Rage comics or all comics, I'm posting this as a potential reason this may be taken down. Meme/Rage Comics: There are subreddits devoted specifically to these things, and such content belongs there. If you have a point to make or a story to tell, make a self-post. It is not the content so much as the format that is the problem, where many subreddits are starting to treat these submissions as spam.
/r/MensRights30/03/12 08:41 PM
4

I'm sure we've had different interactions then. I'm happy to agree to disagree on this point as it doesn't put us at odds within the MRM as we both still have the same goals.
/r/MensRights30/03/12 08:13 PM
5

I'd argue it's that they don't know about men's problems because men have been silent about them for too long.
/r/MensRights30/03/12 08:02 PM
3

If you want to hold to an ideology that harms men's rights Proof? If the majority of the people here agreed with you (If your OP had significantly more upvotes) I wouldn't feel an ounce of regret for withdrawing my full support of the MRM as it would obviously be a place where I wouldn't be welcomed for my political views. Remember, it's that your vitriolic reactions are what harms the MRM. Since you're unable to see this and I'm sure that neither of us will agree I will no longer respond to you…
/r/MensRights30/03/12 06:42 PM
7

To me it looks like you're attempting to push the U.S views of politics and political segregation into an issue that doesn't require it. I find this a deeply concerning issue that is rampant in the U.S and the cause of a lot of the social woes in the country (an outsiders view). These sort of conversations do nothing but shut out potential supporters and alienating supporters from countries that are not the U.S. I think generally Americans in the MRM need to learn to understand that not everyone…
/r/MensRights30/03/12 06:22 PM
4

Hmmm, so myself being a part of the NDP (Socialist party in Canada) invalidates the fact that I volunteer at a Mens Homeless Shelter and that I put up posters around local Post Secondary Campuses to support the MRM? I never knew that I wasn't allowed in the MRM, I guess I'll have to stop debating gender issues with Feminists now and just let everything I see slide since I'm against mens rights. ಠ_ಠ
/r/MensRights30/03/12 06:03 PM
2

To be fair, the old female privilege page was garbage and was unsourced. I do think we can re-create this page and keep it good order but someone that's better at Wikipedia than I would have to put in some serious research time.
/r/MensRights30/03/12 02:41 PM
1

That was actually brought up in the Wiki AfD. The issue is that no one could point out to a scholarly study on the subject but if you can find one that meets the requirement of the AfD conclusion you could bring it up in the Mens Rights Wiki page and get the Female Privilege page re-created.
/r/MensRights30/03/12 02:16 PM
4

Took me a couple minutes to find my old post about it. Direct Link to the Wiki discussion, pay attention to the User TP (TParis), he's the SyOp that was for keeping the page and was successfully holding his position within Wikipedia rules. I think his arguments should be required reading for any MRA that would like to add any MRM info to Wikipedia.
/r/MensRights30/03/12 02:14 PM
5

This exactly, a really good discussion on the Female Privilege article came about a month ago and it came down to this. A Syop was defending the Female Privilege page (his arguments were flawless, I suggest taking a look at them if you want to know how to deal with feminists on Wikipedia) but no independent research could be produced to support the article. The decision by Wiki admins on the article was that if proper sources could be produced the article can be created but until that time it wo…
/r/MensRights30/03/12 01:21 PM
4

How full of yourself do you have to be to say the following? The whole conference sounds very self centered and U.S-centric in detriment to real issues faced around the world. The American secretary of state then compared the bravery of Sandra Fluke to that of Burmese dissidents — praising women who are “assuming the risks that come with sticking your neck out, whether you are a democracy activist in Burma or a Georgetown law student in the United States.”
/r/MensRights29/03/12 01:06 AM
2

I have to believe this is fake. Edit** Not saying it is fake, just that I will believe that it is fake for my own state of mind.
/r/MensRights28/03/12 06:17 PM
1

Not sure why this was downvoted, it is the appropriate place to post.
/r/MensRights28/03/12 01:30 PM
1

I haven't seen any of their posts lately so I'm not sure what their current contributions are. I'm mostly just sick of seeing any dissenting opinion being labeled a troll when they're not.
/r/MensRights28/03/12 01:14 PM
3

About the only problem I've seen with the feminist theory of therapy is that name. The issue with feminist theory in this case is: The findings highlighted further the difficulty in not being able to separate the male survivor from the male perpetrator. Male survivors (said that) when asking for help as a victim, they would be directed to men’s violence programs or not understood and have to be explicit about what had happened to them.
/r/MensRights28/03/12 01:11 PM
5

I'm glad that this is out in from reputable source, hopefully this will get some traction. In working with male victims some aspects of feminist theory can act as a barrier to successfully engaging with men and we need to develop different ways of working that address the complexities, subtleties and uniqueness of the male experience.
/r/MensRights28/03/12 04:54 AM
4

I would like to say that although I don't always agree with NiceGuySTFU (who is brought up in the linked thread) I don't think he's a troll. I say this because he's posted constructive comments before and I've seen him set a couple people straight when it comes to MR issues.
/r/MensRights28/03/12 04:42 AM
17

I liked the part where you said free speech, atheism, and Men's rights are like supporting pedophiles.
/r/MensRights27/03/12 04:13 PM
4

the RCMP released a statement saying Sgt. Don Davidson and Const. Patti Ramsay had been confronted in an upstairs bedroom by Wright, who was holding a knife and a hatchet. Even if this is true, why was the RCMP officer in the upstairs bedroom?
/r/MensRights27/03/12 01:44 PM
5

I volunteer at a local mens shelter (only one that I know of in the area) and every couple months I go out and put up flyers at the local university for a MR group that meets on campus.
/r/MensRights27/03/12 12:26 AM
6

Sorry if I'm wrong but it sounds like she's using part of the script from here. Could just be me though.
/r/MensRights26/03/12 11:18 PM
3

Report and move on.
/r/MensRights26/03/12 11:15 PM
2

Doesn't belong here.
/r/MensRights26/03/12 01:23 AM
9

Article for those comments.
/r/MensRights25/03/12 04:41 PM
3

Not really, Melzl said. Huggies is reponding to unhappy men, because those men have the ear of women. "All of this," the initial campaign, the full-on response, is targeted at moms," he said. "I don't want there to be any question about who we we're going after."
/r/MensRights25/03/12 04:39 PM
2

Didn't huggies come out and say that they didn't want there to be confusion, they only apologized because of the wives who were also outraged?
/r/MensRights25/03/12 06:14 AM
5

This should explain it for you, sources are cited.
/r/MensRights25/03/12 02:47 AM
5

Example 1 Example 2
/r/MensRights24/03/12 01:37 AM
9

I like the part where they bring up the wage-gap myth as a fact.
/r/MensRights24/03/12 01:24 AM
0

I agree that suicide isn't selfish but I wouldn't go as far as calling it a life choice.
/r/MensRights24/03/12 01:22 AM
2

This belongs over in /r/mensrightsmeta
/r/MensRights23/03/12 02:34 PM
8

The Pentagon, alarmed at the rising incidence of genital wounds, has rushed $19 million worth of protective garments to Afghanistan, including 165,000 pairs of blast-resistant briefs and 45,000 diaper-like garments to protect the genitals from upward blast.. At least they're attempting to address the issue.
/r/MensRights23/03/12 01:57 PM
2

It's just like how some feminists point to men who are pedophiles and then use that to hate the MRM.
/r/MensRights23/03/12 01:30 PM
1

Their records are wiped clean at 18 anyway Depending on the charge and jurisdiction.
/r/MensRights23/03/12 01:29 PM
1

I agree! And thanks for that link, I'm going to use that as a response from now on!
/r/MensRights21/03/12 04:38 PM
53

Your title is missing the most crucial fact: A Nigerian immigrant is responsible for paying child support for twins conceived through in vitro fertilization with his wife -- even though the procedure took place at least a year after the couple had separated When I first read the title I thought it was just some guy who had sex with his ex and didn't want to deal with the resulting child.
/r/MensRights21/03/12 01:26 PM
10

Yea, thats why I put the quotes around Tolerated. I'm just more pissed off that they're comparing us to what they're defining as the jailbait subreddit.
/r/MensRights20/03/12 08:24 PM
59

Only mention of /r/MensRights: Of course, like any site that thrives on pseudonymity, Reddit attracts its share of the sick and the deluded. There’s a subreddit, MensRights, “for people who believe that men are currently being disadvantaged by society,” and for years the site admins tolerated subreddits devoted to pictures of underage girls. (In February, Reddit banned sexual content involving minors.) Last year, redditors heaped abuse on a 21-year-old woman who was trying to raise money for kid…
/r/MensRights20/03/12 07:28 PM
3

See the talk page for: All I'll say is that the references in this article are appalling, as is the format of it. You ought to read other articles and observe how references are formated; I for one, have not seen articles that say "(source 3)" as a reference. The reader has no idea what source you are referring to and thus cannot verify your claims. Wikipedia articles also have internal links to related articles within the text. Furthermore, this article explains the views on this subject only f…
/r/MensRights20/03/12 03:46 PM
2

pattern of defiance to a court order And he was proven to be in the right because the judge is letting him not comply with the order. He isn't found in contempt which is telling in itself.
/r/MensRights19/03/12 06:20 PM
7

redditor for 11 minutes So a troll then?
/r/MensRights19/03/12 05:29 PM
8

Old article. Comment that appeared in 2X when this was first published that I agree with: N8theGr8 33 points 16 days ago: This is a sensationalist headline. The law does not declare single parenthood equivalent to child abuse, rather is claims that it is a contributing factor. If children of single parents are at higher risk for child abuse than children with two parents, I would consider the bill to be correct. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Child_abuse#Prevalence
/r/MensRights19/03/12 05:23 PM
3

Text here: Unbelievably Stupid Law Would Declare Single Parenthood Child Abuse Wisconsin, that land of beer, cheese, and Aaron Rodgers jerseys, has had a tough couple of years, government-wise. First, they elected a bunch of, from what I can tell, taxidermied badgers holding guns to state legislature. To make matters worse, their governor seems to be an evil yet gloppy Koch puppet. And now, one state legislator has decided it's a good idea consider being a single parent a form of child abuse. On…
/r/MensRights19/03/12 05:19 PM
2

Comments here should have more then enough links to various news sources that talk about this.
/r/MensRights19/03/12 04:29 PM
2

I hope he wins but I wouldn't bet on in.
/r/MensRights19/03/12 03:33 PM
2

No, but I think you should still get the credit you deserve, this way no one will think you're just saying you put it up and dismiss you just because they don't like you.
/r/MensRights19/03/12 01:46 PM
2

Link, you should get some up votes at least.
/r/MensRights19/03/12 04:08 AM
3

Lets hope that now we're getting proper attention to this through mainstream articles like businessinsider the myth will start to break down.
/r/MensRights16/03/12 07:59 PM
3

I don't think that MoonFlower thinks that's why we have the bot, I believe they were just commenting on how the bot could be re-purposed. I think this is coming up because there has been some brouhaha recently about the political subreddits deleting self posts that are against the mods personal politics.
/r/MensRights16/03/12 01:48 PM
33

/r/ainbow
/r/MensRights16/03/12 04:08 AM
3

redditor for 35 minutes
/r/MensRights15/03/12 05:55 PM
1

As much as I agree, you should either do a self post that explains your position and maybe include this link but as it stands you should prob delete this post: Meme/Rage Comics: There are subreddits devoted specifically to these things, and such content belongs there. If you have a point to make or a story to tell, make a self-post. It is not the content so much as the format that is the problem, where many subreddits are starting to treat these submissions as spam.
/r/MensRights15/03/12 04:53 PM
7

So if you find any illegal content remember not to report it to the police and just delete the content so you don't lose access to your child for 4 months?
/r/MensRights15/03/12 02:36 PM
2

Ok, I read it... so it's satire and troll bait. As much as I enjoy satire I'm not sure if it's how it's presented or my lack of coffee this morning but I'm still not to crazy for this post. I will however un-downvote this thread and try to give it a second reading once I get more caffeine.
/r/MensRights15/03/12 01:58 PM
-4

I'm an MRA and I downvoted :/
/r/MensRights15/03/12 01:38 PM
2

Don't be angry. Man up. This is where you lost me.
/r/MensRights15/03/12 01:36 PM
1

Yea, where is the bot?
/r/MensRights15/03/12 01:34 PM
1

Go away troll.
/r/MensRights14/03/12 07:47 PM
0

I wasn't saying it has anything to do with MR (although i think it does), I'm more defending myself as an Albertan and how this paints us as rednecks even though it's a question without context leading to inaccurate results.
/r/MensRights14/03/12 06:49 PM
1

The one in 10 men that she references is really misleading as the question asked if the man disagreed that it's appropriate to hit a women if they angered them... I know I get angry when I'm assaulted with a weapon so I would have to say that in that case it would be appropriate. It seems that I'm one of those 10 men. Misleading questions without context creates misleading quotes without context.
/r/MensRights14/03/12 03:50 PM
1

How can they be worries that some people may be scared to come forward with an accusation? If you don't have proof of abuse you shouldn't be accusing someone of abuse.
/r/MensRights14/03/12 01:44 PM
1

I feel bad that my first thought was that I thought those paint jobs were poorly done... Also, when I go out to tabletop game half the players are women in the age range of 18 - 25.
/r/MensRights14/03/12 01:42 PM
5

Morgan Freeman has your back. **Edit to fix link
/r/MensRights14/03/12 01:39 PM
1

Meme/Rage Comics: There are subreddits devoted specifically to these things, and such content belongs there. If you have a point to make or a story to tell, make a self-post. It is not the content so much as the format that is the problem, where many subreddits are starting to treat these submissions as spam.
/r/MensRights13/03/12 08:14 PM
3

I knew we could agree on something :)
/r/MensRights13/03/12 07:00 PM
5

This also happens to women teachers who acted in porn as well. I've also seen this happen to female teachers. I don't think it's proper for the school board to act in this way but I do understand that they don't want the institutions credibility being undermined by students passing around porn of their teachers.
/r/MensRights13/03/12 06:30 PM
2

Thanks!
/r/MensRights13/03/12 03:58 PM
2

Can we ban this guy? A look at his history shows that he's just a troll.
/r/MensRights13/03/12 03:22 PM
18

And labeled by the SPLC as a hate group.
/r/MensRights13/03/12 03:15 PM
8

Just when I thought the goodmenproject was starting to be more inclusive with allowing people representing MR to write for them.
/r/MensRights13/03/12 01:17 PM
1

I like some of this bots other works, overall this bot is one of my favourite ones out there.
/r/MensRights13/03/12 04:15 AM
15

The quote is actually worse than that: because those men have the ear of women. "All of this," the initial campaign, the full-on response, is targeted at moms," he said. "I don't want there to be any question about who we we're going after." He doesn't want there to be a question that the men only matter because their partner may listen to them.
/r/MensRights13/03/12 03:58 AM
2

I'm not claiming that, and they aren't a troll site. They have had their inner-forums leaked before and it's really disgusting stuff. You can google RadFem to find the files yourself but I can't produce them here.
/r/MensRights12/03/12 09:29 PM
3

If you look at the comments you'll see that this line of thought usually devolves into how "Biological solutions" to men can be realized... They're a hate site which openly talks about genocide against all or the majority of men.
/r/MensRights12/03/12 09:17 PM
2

I think this is what you're looking for and if you agree with these statements then I don't think you'll be well liked around here.
/r/MensRights12/03/12 08:58 PM
2

So you're a RadFem?
/r/MensRights12/03/12 08:36 PM
4

I'm in Canada so my response may not be on point but I just go into the doctors office/planned parent hood and just grab a bunch of condoms for free, neither care that I do this and they're just happy that I'm being safe.
/r/MensRights12/03/12 08:08 PM
1

Depends on the type of MR you subscribe to. I believe the user MRMRising subscribes to political traditionalist (although I may be wrong about the traditionalist part) MR line of thought.
/r/MensRights12/03/12 08:05 PM
1

Again, I'm not saying that it can't be a good thing. I'm just saying that we need to do more for IMD to raise it's awareness and that posts saying that it's already there are misleading since it isn't yet, we still have to work on it.
/r/MensRights12/03/12 08:04 PM
1

Uhh, if you read my post above you'll see that every month I go out and put up posters in regards to MR and every IMD I go out and put up posters for various IMD events so I'm not sure why you think I'm not trying to raise awareness. I'm saying that the reply, to people asking for IMD to be recognized, of 'It already exists' creates an environment where men won't try to bring awareness to is because they already think it's a thing when it really isn't.
/r/MensRights12/03/12 07:18 PM
1

I'm not saying that we shouldn't stay at it and make it a International Holiday, I'm just saying that people who say "Oh but there is an IMD" or "Every other day is mens day" are really just throwing around a misconception in attempt to stop men from realizing that there isn't actually one. The name is misleading is the only thing I'm arguing as it's not a recognized day.
/r/MensRights12/03/12 06:52 PM
1

Again, all the page has is that UNESCO supports the day but the fact that it isn't on their website as an international holiday is my issue as that means it isn't recognized internationally. Also, every IMD I do go out and put up flyers (I actually do this monthly for various MR issues) but I also notice that they get ripped down the same day I put them up.
/r/MensRights12/03/12 06:13 PM
13

Just some context from part 1 of the post: “Would you rather work for a man or a woman?” over half (56%) said gender didn’t matter. Now for the bad news: Of the remaining 44% who would choose their boss based on gender, 32% would select a man and only 11% would select a women. That’s a disappointing 3-to-1 margin, although many of the women at least had the decency to be conflicted, e.g.
/r/MensRights12/03/12 04:58 PM
13

Removing the breast bud of baby girls reduces the risk of breast cancer too!
/r/MensRights12/03/12 04:06 PM
19

I never actually thought of it in this context, thanks for the update SQLwitch.
/r/MensRights12/03/12 03:56 PM
2

I can't find a link saying UNESCO recognizes it, only those of UNESCO representatives indicating that they think it's a good idea. Please can you provide a source showing they recognize it as the link provided doesn't mention them. I would also like to mention that I do celebrate it but I don't see nearly as many signs and posters around campuses and the city (see: none) celebrating it like I see for Womens Day. (I don't mean to troll you or anything and I am actually curious to them recognizing…
/r/MensRights12/03/12 03:43 PM
9

Here you go!
/r/MensRights12/03/12 03:37 PM
5

I would also suggest that you go over to the other posts to upvote them so they can be seen by their respective communities.
/r/MensRights12/03/12 03:25 PM
1

Also not recognized by the U.N. Saying that there is an international men's day (all lower caps since it's not officially recognized) is a red herring as it doesn't actually exist internationally.
/r/MensRights12/03/12 02:40 PM
2

Not shady at all... A department spokesman refused to answer detailed questions about how much money had been paid, what had happened to the money, and what processes were in place to ensure similar events did not happen, citing privacy reasons.
/r/MensRights12/03/12 02:11 PM
1

Meme/Rage Comics: There are subreddits devoted specifically to these things, and such content belongs there. If you have a point to make or a story to tell, make a self-post. It is not the content so much as the format that is the problem, where many subreddits are starting to treat these submissions as spam. I do agree with Hardwarequestions but this topic should of been created as a self post describing your issue with the use of the terms and maybe included this as a link in the post (althoug…
/r/MensRights11/03/12 05:23 PM
23

"A man is not a man if he doesn't own a house," said Chen Xiaomin, director of the Women's Studies Center at the Shanghai University of Political Science and Law. "Marriage is becoming more and more materialistic. This is a huge change in Chinese society. No matter how confident a woman is, she will lose face if her boyfriend or husband doesn't have a house." Who would say these obviously sexist things? director of the Women's Studies Center at the Shanghai University Ohhhhhh, I get it. Equality…
/r/MensRights11/03/12 05:20 PM
11

Also not recognized by the U.N
/r/MensRights11/03/12 05:00 PM
13

I love it: For instance, in 2010 the American Association of University Women lamented the "striking disparity between the numbers of men and women in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics," and concluded that "we must take a hard look at the stereotypes and biases that still pervade our culture. Encouraging more girls and women to enter these vital fields will require careful attention to the environment in our classrooms and workplaces and throughout our culture." We look forward t…
/r/MensRights11/03/12 06:49 AM
1

Meme/Rage Comics: There are subreddits devoted specifically to these things, and such content belongs there. If you have a point to make or a story to tell, make a self-post. It is not the content so much as the format that is the problem, where many subreddits are starting to treat these submissions as spam.
/r/MensRights11/03/12 01:50 AM
4

Subreddit drama has a bunch of threads on this, going through them would be the easiest way to get caught up. I'll warn you that the comments are all over the place though.
/r/MensRights10/03/12 05:47 PM
0

We might get an uptick in subs when people read this, come to see what we discuss, and then see that we're reasonable and join the cause.
/r/MensRights10/03/12 05:02 AM
3

I'm good for that as long as Ma99ie is.
/r/MensRights10/03/12 12:36 AM
3

I try to call them RadFems.
/r/MensRights09/03/12 09:59 PM
5

I don't think they should but I know in sensitive industries (government, security, policing) any links to any potential hate groups is enough to get you fired. I work for a security firm and it's against my contract to be a part of or contribute to a recognized hate group but I'm safe since I'm not in the U.S.
/r/MensRights09/03/12 09:55 PM
7

I'm not 100% sure on how American NPO's that get federal funding work but can we submit a request for the reasoning and justifications behind the classification of being a hate group. I mean, if this was a Canadian Org we could just file a request for information with their funding body and if the justifications aren't proper their funding could be cut.
/r/MensRights09/03/12 09:34 PM
4

One of the good things about being in the MRM and not being in the U.S is that it's not classified a hate group outside of their jurisdiction. (Not that I'm saying those outside of the U.S shouldn't care, but that we can't lose our jobs over this).
/r/MensRights09/03/12 09:30 PM
1

Broken link! try [] before the ().
/r/MensRights09/03/12 09:28 PM
3

Best counter site ever.
/r/MensRights09/03/12 09:26 PM
32

As I understand it Qanan was talking to SPLC about getting this subreddit removed as a hate group as they do receive federal funding and put no research into the justification of identifying us as a hate group.
/r/MensRights09/03/12 08:50 PM
16

I think it was the implication that it may be a sick joke.
/r/MensRights09/03/12 07:58 PM
3

That's true when talking about how he's being criticized by feminist groups but not as to why he's getting media attention on his bad sources. Proper sources would do wonders to how he's perceived in the media and to those who encounter the MRM through articles like this one.
/r/MensRights09/03/12 05:19 PM
9

Can an enterprising MRA with good sources send Zachary here some better sources of peer reviewed papers? I think the only reason the criticism is sticking is that he's sourcing his facts with blogs and not the papers the blogs refer to.
/r/MensRights09/03/12 02:36 PM
1

Look sir, trolls!
/r/MensRights09/03/12 02:49 AM
8

I don't think we should be raiding r/relationships anytime someone there gives really bad advice. As much as I agree that it's a false equivalence this feels a little too "SRSy".
/r/MensRights09/03/12 02:41 AM
2

I won't argue you in regards to this, a lot of people in Scouting have the same views that you do and I understand where it comes from. Unfortunately the majority of those in Scouting have very little to do with any of these decisions.
/r/MensRights09/03/12 02:38 AM
3

Because apparently it's legal to discriminate against men in the UK? I'm not sure to be honest, the whole institution of Girl Guides bugs me when I was told that we were allowing girls in Scouting but Guides were not allowing boys in.
/r/MensRights08/03/12 10:07 PM
7

This is what I'm saying. I have no issues with boy to girl ratio in Scouts (I'm a scout leader myself), so in my mind this isn't the real issue. The real issue is that Girl Guides don't allow for boy's to join their groups and the ones who have let little brothers or single fathers come to camp have been punished severely by their area commissioners which is a real shame.
/r/MensRights08/03/12 09:37 PM
6

It's no longer Boy Scouts, it's Scouts. What you should be complaining about is that it's still GIRL Guides, not Guides.
/r/MensRights08/03/12 07:25 PM
11

I'm going to preface this with saying that I'm a programmer. Proper spell checks don't have a list of words that that are correct as that would be a huge amount of disk space dedicated to spell checking, they normally have an algorithm to check if a word is properly formed and then they have a list of 'exception' words that are correct but fail the algorithm (you can normally add words to this list). I'm going to assume that both 'misandry' and 'misogyny' fail the algorithm test and that due to …
/r/MensRights08/03/12 07:22 PM
18

From the comments: How can they manage multi-national accounts, keep track of every detail of every person and piece of technology at their client's company...yet not remember that the trash goes out every Tuesday morning? Maybe because they're busy trying to remember their multinational accounts, every detail of every person in their company, and every piece of technology at their client's (not to mention their own) site?
/r/MensRights08/03/12 03:12 PM
2

Because they define "Job" as working in a field, so a Jr Developer at a software company is considered having the same "job" as a Sr Developer. This wouldn't be as much of a problem (although still inaccurate) if it wasn't for the fact that many women take time away from their career to have children and thus barring them from certain promotions during that time while their male counterparts stay in the workforce.
/r/MensRights08/03/12 02:34 PM
3

I don't know why your getting downvoted, what you say is true. I think that it may be because some in the MRM that aren't from the U.S don't like the undercurrent of American Politics the movement sometimes has (due to the majority of the MRAs on this reddit being from the US).
/r/MensRights08/03/12 05:06 AM
2

I think many more MRA's would be willing to side with conservatives and their obvious anti-feminism tendencies if they ditched the Christian conservative angle. I'm not so sure about that because the Conservatives in Canada, although most Christians support them, rarely play up that angle anymore and I haven't seen a large shift of support towards them. (Although this might just be because they always seem embroiled in some controversy)
/r/MensRights08/03/12 02:29 AM
1

"WWZDIHWAPC"?
/r/MensRights07/03/12 10:01 PM
3

From your comment on that thread to save some redditors a couple clicks: Abastract: In 2003, a new law required that 40 percent of Norwegian firms’ directors be women – at the time only nine percent of directors were women. We use the pre-quota cross-sectional variation in female board representation to instrument for exogenous changes to corporate boards following the quota. We find that the constraint imposed by the quota caused a significant drop in the stock price at the announcement of the law…
/r/MensRights07/03/12 09:05 PM
4

I'll upvote to counteract whatever downvotes you've received but how do you know that he's the one downvoting? I don't mean to be a wet blanket but it looks like you have someone watching your profile and just downvoting everything you do.
/r/MensRights07/03/12 09:01 PM
3

bill introduced last June would address disparities by requiring the boards of publicly traded firms to have at least 40 per cent representation of each gender. I don't agree with this as I think it stops qualified people from getting jobs due to quotas but at least it's not as bad as it is in England right now where they're allowing employers to discriminate against Men but not Women. I would also like to mention that this bill was introduced through the Canadian Senate so it most likely won't …
/r/MensRights07/03/12 07:42 PM
5

Love your bot eeph!
/r/MensRights07/03/12 04:06 PM
7

I'm not sure that's a view help by the majority of feminists, more of a subsection of LGBT rights (not all of them) that thinks this way.
/r/MensRights06/03/12 09:06 PM
1

Not that I disagree or agree with you but can you present a couple examples for those who haven't noticed his normally downvoted comments?
/r/MensRights06/03/12 07:36 PM
2

So you're a troll? I'm actually confused so I apologize if you're not, but it looks like you are.
/r/MensRights05/03/12 02:50 PM
3

That may be true but that doesn't mean we shouldn't put in the effort to correct this issues. I say that we go through each source on feminist and related pages and delete anything that isn't directly stated in the sourced document (I've found a bunch like that and deleted a bunch of content with impunity as I was following proper wiki rules). I think we can use a lot of wiki's own rules to break apart a lot of pages pushing unbiased views to make a more objective view. That along with adding in…
/r/MensRights03/03/12 04:07 AM
1

I was joking, I just needed a name of another poster and I saw yours first.
/r/MensRights03/03/12 01:22 AM
1

but most of us here are and they know it I would say some people here are as we have no way to accurately count who is and isn't or to declare a majority view.
/r/MensRights02/03/12 10:51 PM
1

Yea, I assumed good faith and was just having some fun :) I just didn't want the OP to think that they had to put their real account here since they mentioned in the IAmA that they worried that someone might start harassing them (maybe even IRL if they went back through their posts).
/r/MensRights02/03/12 08:18 PM
2

He may already be posting here with his real account... He could be you, me, Celda, anyone! THEY'RE IN THE WALLS!
/r/MensRights02/03/12 07:36 PM
1

I agree, just because of a power differential in one aspect of their public life it doesn't mean that they will have it in their personal life. If this is considered rape then every judge who believes in 'teh patriarchy' will see fit to sentence every man to jail time for consensual sex. This leans too heavily on RadFem for my tastes. **autocorrect correction.
/r/MensRights02/03/12 02:57 PM
12

I wasn't respecting his side of the issue. Most times, he is the more grounded, down to Earth guy. He keeps my ridiculousness in check. I feel bad about it now, and I've apologized. It won't stop me from prying him about it in the future completely, but for the moment, I'm content with our sex life the way it is.
/r/MensRights02/03/12 02:47 PM
3

the formatting was off and we didn't like the color scheme Ummm, I said that we needed properly sourced resources, that's a little more important than your hyperbolic response and should be required for an encyclopedia.
/r/MensRights29/02/12 03:18 PM
1

Yea, I think someone in the discussion actually posted something like that (if not that exactly). It's all good to post it showing that this exists, it's another to make the Wiki article reflect that. I would be more then happy to go in and do it myself but I'll be the first to admit that I know more about how Wikipedia is supposed to work than how to actually add information properly. Anyone in MR good with Wikipedia? Preferably someone with an account showing older edits in good faith so they …
/r/MensRights28/02/12 10:21 PM
1

I don't care if someone takes offense to my words, I care that having the majority of outsiders thinking we hate women thus ignoring the real issues is being caused by polarizing arguments that aren't needed. Our arguments are strong enough without having to use emotionally based arguments, that's something Feminism excels at and a place where we'll never be able to beat them. We should be the movement of facts and proofs, not a mirror image of feminism fighting in the opposite direction. **mino…
/r/MensRights28/02/12 08:29 PM
8

It's properly sourced with papers and books that refer to it as 'Male Privilege', we just need to do the same for the Female Privilege page.
/r/MensRights28/02/12 08:18 PM
2

I don't think Dianic Wicca is a real thing, I think that Dianic Wicca has had a book, a paper, and page on a Website dedicated to tracking different Wicca beliefs written on the subject which is what makes this topic an appropriate one for Wikipedia to detail.
/r/MensRights28/02/12 08:17 PM
7

Just to note one of the comments in that discussion: Comment: The previously mentioned anti-feminist group on reddit has linked to this AfD and will likely start opposing deletion soon. WillowDRosenberg (talk) 19:35, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
/r/MensRights28/02/12 08:15 PM
0

I don't agree with this sentiment but even if I did think of how it looks to an outsider looking in. They see that you're calling feminists (most laypersons see this as being mostly women) Nazis -- they may equate this with you calling all women Nazis. I'm not saying this is what you believe or that they're assuming correctly but for any observer they would see this as a polarization that they can't agree with, this is what would cause a lot of people thinking MRAs like me and you hate women.
/r/MensRights28/02/12 08:13 PM
5

First one bothers me greatly but that second one - not so much. Is Wikipedia not allowed to detail a belief structure? They're not advocating for it and if you can find valid criticism of it I would suggest editing the page yourself and add a Criticisms section.
/r/MensRights28/02/12 08:04 PM
3

Godwin's law - Sorry, I can't (I'm sure most can't) take an argument seriously when you say any group is like Nazi Germany. If feminists actually start killing people, ok... but right now, not really. Comparing anyone to Nazis or Hitler is the same as admitting your argument doesn't have enough clout without invoking emotional arguments, this is closer to being the 'feminist' you define than anything. As soon as you polarize an argument with this sort of rhetoric you're just damaging your side, …
/r/MensRights28/02/12 07:45 PM
8

Discussion on the deletion. Please be mindful that AfD discussions tend to be more civil so don't be inflammatory if you join in. I do think that Female Privilege has a place on Wikipedia but as some of the commenter's have mentioned the current write-up isn't properly sourced and just looks like a mess, if we want this to be protected we will need to rebuild the page with proper sourcing that actually mentions the term "female privilege" (Not that I think that should be absolutely required but …
/r/MensRights28/02/12 07:18 PM
4

When it comes to job interviews, hiring, funding, and publishing, women are treated as well as men and sometimes better. All the over-compensation to please the feminist lobbying groups I suppose.
/r/MensRights26/02/12 04:00 PM
4

Sexual violence against women is the result of the cult of masculinity A false image of manhood makes men act violently and risk their lives against their own interests as humans. It must be addressed Gloria Steinem and Lauren Wolfe guardian.co.uk, Friday 24 February 2012 14.17 GMT 'Neither in war zones nor in street gangs is rape primarily about sex.' Photograph: David Sillitoe for the Guardian Gangs of young men rape girls. They also sometimes act as pimps that seduce a girl, then subject her …
/r/MensRights24/02/12 08:08 PM
3

It is proposed that this article be deleted because of the following concern: Article is a fucking joke. I don't think this is a proper concern that you can delete wiki articles with.
/r/MensRights24/02/12 03:10 PM
5

No.
/r/MensRights22/02/12 10:09 PM
4

That is one of the problems with society I think this is more accurate than what you stated. I don't think only feminists hold this belief, it's more of a universal one in the western world.
/r/MensRights22/02/12 07:10 PM
3

(liberal) Just as a warning, this quote might get you the most flack from some people here.
/r/MensRights22/02/12 06:53 PM
1

It's good to have dissent to generate new ideas imo.
/r/MensRights22/02/12 01:03 AM
4

Still very US-centric, still very off putting to all the non-Americans in this subreddit.
/r/MensRights22/02/12 01:00 AM
3

This exactly! I don't need another countries socio-political agendas rammed down my throat because they believe their politics are the only correct politics.
/r/MensRights22/02/12 12:59 AM
0

I am a Canadian and voted NDP in the last election. Same! I was using it more of a way to point out the belief that your political interests have to be represented in the Mods of a subreddit that you frequent is a poor belief.
/r/MensRights22/02/12 12:58 AM
9

As a Canadian talking to what I presume to be an America, I am always tired about Americans talking about right and left, Republican and Democrat, Red and Blue... Please just stop. If I was as self centred as some of the American Redditors here I would be demanding that we have a Mod who clearly represents the NDP. It's just silly to demand that Mods from a subreddit represent your political views expressly and to your exact expectations - don't be absurd.
/r/MensRights21/02/12 09:44 PM
2

It's only relevant if you're a Conservative in the US and think your form of MR is the only appropriate form.
/r/MensRights21/02/12 07:25 PM
7

You can show your protest by unsubscribing? If your view is that this subreddit will eventually die then shouldn't you be one of the first to leave?
/r/MensRights21/02/12 07:23 PM
2

She probably also believes that all men are rapists Cite your source before you spread hateful misinformation.
/r/MensRights17/02/12 05:50 PM
3

Wow, not appropriate at all. I'm sorry, I can't even bring myself to think about upvoting this submission because of your comment.
/r/MensRights17/02/12 04:23 PM
7

Most likely not due to the content of this post but because they're a SRS regular.
/r/MensRights17/02/12 04:06 PM
8

My money is on ignore.
/r/MensRights17/02/12 03:03 PM
1

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Topfreedom#United_States
/r/MensRights17/02/12 02:48 PM
1

I think its an irresponsible way to act that way as would cripple the girl in a way that would disallow them from appropriately contributing to society in a constructive way. I believe this would make them forever dependent on another person even after completion of their schooling and since most likely after a certain age the man will drop her for someone younger (thats usually how the "sugar daddy" relationship works) she will eventually become an unneeded strain on social security nets. This …
/r/MensRights17/02/12 02:44 PM
2

In JeremiahMRAs opinion.
/r/MensRights17/02/12 02:35 PM
7

I realize I was the only one who thought we should stop linking and raiding /2x and /feminism. Ouch, I comment that we shouldn't be raiding other subreddits :P I agree 100% with this though. We should watch what memes and comics get posted because they make us look like we're complaining and making up issues without anything backing it up. To an outsider they just see the comic and think "Those guys complain a lot" not "Huh, I should read the sidebar and find the relevant paper detailing how thi…
/r/MensRights17/02/12 02:32 PM
1

I advocate this response. I don't find calling an individual a "whore" an insult to the entire gender in some contexts but in this context where all parties agreed to the arrangement this is really uncalled for.
/r/MensRights16/02/12 10:30 PM
1

If I was a feminist I'm pretty sure my response would be "Check your privilege". If Feminism expects ALL men to watch our privilege, wouldn't it be fair to expect the same thing from them?
/r/MensRights16/02/12 10:27 PM
0

I think the reason this is discussion worthy is because it flies in the face of feminist patriarchy theory. I never thought of it this way to be honest, but that might be because I reject the theory of the patriarchy and I didn't even think to see it through that lens. Thinking of it in this fashion - this topic makes sense to me in that context now.
/r/MensRights16/02/12 08:43 PM
1

Thats strange, I get an abortion debate playing when I follow the link through... The youtube magics are beyond me.
/r/MensRights16/02/12 08:40 PM
1

This is an abortion debate on the view... I don't really see this as too much of a MR issue as much as it is a general political/religious issue in the US.
/r/MensRights16/02/12 08:01 PM
7

As much as I think this girl is the scum of the earth you can't withhold accountability on the men who are willing to provide this money. I don't think this is an appropriate type of relationship for anyone to have tbh but if the guy wants to give his money away to the girl knowingly (he signed up for a dating service specifically to do this, he's not being manipulated into do this) then let him.
/r/MensRights16/02/12 07:56 PM
3

I would like to say that you should try to keep the questions in a respectful tone that won't immediately put them on the defensive as this would likely cause your results to be skewed. I'm not saying that you shouldn't challenge them with tough questions but don't go in swinging and accusing them of anything, allow them to respond fully before presenting any additional points. Also, when you do get that put together would you please provide us with where we can go and get the interview? I would…
/r/MensRights16/02/12 07:18 PM
4

Fair but I don't see many people complaining that when women do less work that they get paid less. It's people who complain about what they perceive is the same amount of work for less pay without considering other factors. I just don't think this image accurately articulates the issue and dumbs it down to the point where it insults everyone involved, even the viewer.
/r/MensRights16/02/12 06:47 PM
2

Downvoted for displaying and perpetuating the wage-gap myth.
/r/MensRights16/02/12 06:36 PM
1

It's a pain, you have to copy/paste it and then format it with the comment tag per paragraph.
/r/MensRights16/02/12 05:00 PM
4

The Onion?
/r/MensRights16/02/12 04:12 PM
6

Just a quick update, I looked into it a bit and throughout Canada and MOST of the US it's legal but in some areas of the US it can still be considered indecent exposure.
/r/MensRights16/02/12 03:44 PM
6

I actually think its legal in both the US and Canada for women to go topless.
/r/MensRights16/02/12 03:37 PM
1

Sorry, reading comprehension fail :/ I'm not sure where to get it in the UK.
/r/MensRights16/02/12 02:53 PM
1

Oh, well then :P Sorry - I read a comment from you on another post and I assumed.
/r/MensRights16/02/12 02:53 PM
1

As a fellow Canadian I would comment that I think the NDP could show signs of offering mens rights support. At least I haven't noticed anything they've said or done that is expressly against MR.
/r/MensRights16/02/12 02:43 PM
1

I watch that every day at work here in Alberta... Maybe it's my company proxy that allows for it... http://watch.ctv.ca/the-daily-show-with-jon-stewart/ That one should work, this is where I used to watch it.
/r/MensRights16/02/12 02:40 PM
1

http://www.thecomedynetwork.ca/Shows/TheDailyShow
/r/MensRights16/02/12 05:24 AM
1

If at all possible, I would say we should have a system based on maturity and not age I could agree with this but I don't see a way to measure this accurately.
/r/MensRights15/02/12 10:30 PM
3

I think it's an important distinction to differentiate SRS from Feminism just like we would prefer people differentiate SRS raiding us from MR.
/r/MensRights15/02/12 09:59 PM
3

NU-UH! /SRS neeeeeeeeeeeever downvotes! They say so themselves! /sarcasm
/r/MensRights15/02/12 09:41 PM
3

I can see that reaction. I wouldn't condemn someone pursuing that goal, I just don't think it's attainable.
/r/MensRights15/02/12 09:18 PM
2

Unfortunately I think that anyone looking at all the downvoted threads most likely have a stake in one side or the other, I don't think a casual observer would bother expanding anything downvoted into the steep negatives.
/r/MensRights15/02/12 09:14 PM
7

As long as this distinction exists. I wouldn't want us to fall to the levels of SRS and invalidate our own credibility.
/r/MensRights15/02/12 09:13 PM
6

To be honest, I wouldn't argue with a Klansman, I would prefer to allow others not in the Klan to realize that the Klan is a bigoted organization through proofs - I don't think you could use that same proof to change the mind of someone in the Klan. (Looks like someone is just downvoting everything you say - not me, have some upvotes to counteract them)
/r/MensRights15/02/12 09:10 PM
11

I agree with this statement, I just don't see the point on attempting to convince them otherwise. I looked through it and found worse than 'Misandry does not exist' being upvoted and I don't believe that anything we could say could change their minds.
/r/MensRights15/02/12 09:01 PM
43

I'm not sure raiding other subreddits will create too much goodwill, even with the best of intentions.
/r/MensRights15/02/12 08:56 PM
1

Unlikely for it to develop without issues, I don't think a 16 year old has the state of mind to weigh the consequences of entering a relationship with a 40 year old appropriately and that these decisions will undoubtedly cause mental anguish for the child and the guardians of the child regardless of the level of consent given at the time. I also don't think that after being given cocaine of all things can the child comment on whether they thought the relationship was appropriate because if they …
/r/MensRights15/02/12 07:36 PM
1

I disagree with your base assumption that someone in a place of authority over someone, that's 24 years older than the child could have a relationship with a 16 year old without serious mental issues and without causing psychological harm to the child and the child's family.
/r/MensRights15/02/12 03:22 PM
4

I thought this was funny... +1!
/r/MensRights15/02/12 03:18 PM
2

Hear, hear!
/r/MensRights15/02/12 02:28 PM
1

We have, we see that as a part of the problem, even as a joke.
/r/MensRights15/02/12 04:12 AM
19

I won't comment on what I think should or shouldn't be legal, I will only comment on what is and isn't legal. Would these considerations be made if a 40 year-old male teacher offered booze, cocaine, and pot to a 16 year old girl who he then had sex with? lets not forget that he was her student, in a place of authority and power - a trusted position in which the parents believed their son would be safe.
/r/MensRights14/02/12 08:43 PM
1

Don't take it personally, due to recent troll attacks we've had to take precautions like this to ensure you don't edit the post to make it look like we're condoning rape (this has happened in the past) which we do not.
/r/MensRights14/02/12 08:39 PM
3

I am a woman, and I am being taken out on a date tonight. I'm discussing with a close friend on how "He better pay, because I have no money" and he raised a challenge for me to take that statement here. Why? Is it so wrong to expect him to pay because I have no money? Also, he asked me out. Am I supposed to return the favor by paying for the date? Just wondering. Oh, and if I did have money, I would pay for myself. I think it depends heavily on the situation. I myself don't mind spending money o…
/r/MensRights14/02/12 08:01 PM
15

A 16 year old on "booze, cocaine and pot" most likely isn't in a state of mind to reflect properly on whats occurred and how he's been violated.
/r/MensRights14/02/12 06:02 PM
41

You would think that providing booze, cocaine, and pot to a minor would at least warrant a couple years in jail alone without the molestation of a minor.
/r/MensRights14/02/12 05:54 PM
1

Thanks! Just shy of 28000 subs 58 days ago, 138th largest subreddit.
/r/MensRights14/02/12 04:59 PM
45

Ray was arrested last summer for supplying a 16-year-old boy booze, cocaine and pot in addition to having sex with him off-campus on at least three occasions. ... pleaded guilty to in accordance with a plea agreement and was sentenced to three years of probation. wat
/r/MensRights14/02/12 04:52 PM
1

I swear it was around 25000 when I created this account 2 months ago but I could be wrong, is there a place where we can plot a subreddits growth?. I also do see some new names coming up that aren't trolls.
/r/MensRights14/02/12 04:49 PM
7

In 1920, Panzram committed his first murders. He lured sailors in New York away from bars, got them drunk, raped and shot them and dumped their remains into the river. He claimed to have killed ten in all. He was stopped only when the vessel he was in was shipwrecked near Atlantic City, New Jersey; his last two potential victims escaped to parts unknown. Panzram then went to Luanda, Angola, where he claims to have raped and killed an 11- or 12-year-old boy. Not exactly someone that we should end…
/r/MensRights14/02/12 02:49 PM
2

14 people "like" this... Not sure if this is a MR issue or just someone being stupid. I agree that the sentiment has to go but it doesn't look like this person is really rallying people to their cause.
/r/MensRights14/02/12 06:40 AM
1

+1 in hopes of giving you a better mood!
/r/MensRights14/02/12 06:37 AM
0

I wasn't going to look into it tbh, it's coming from a known troll account that's hoping we send vile hatemail that will make us look bad as a whole.
/r/MensRights14/02/12 06:36 AM
1

I think over the last couple months we grew about 5-10k.
/r/MensRights14/02/12 06:35 AM
12

This subreddit is dying I'm not taking yours or Ignatuis side but I do have to point out that the subscriber numbers have been growing.
/r/MensRights14/02/12 01:11 AM
2

My comment was more to warn people that he's a troll so people don't just start sending spam and angry messages to whoever's email the troll posted.
/r/MensRights14/02/12 01:08 AM
3

Troll
/r/MensRights14/02/12 12:01 AM
5

Troll responding to a troll... Trollception!
/r/MensRights13/02/12 07:40 PM
9

Thanks for sharing! I'm definitely subscribing.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 06:40 PM
5

In my latest relationship I was lucky enough to be with a woman who pretty much stood right with me on most of the issues unfairly affecting men today, but I realize not everybody is that fortunate. So I ask, just out of curiosity, how does your SO see your views on MRA issues? Do they encourage it and support it or trivialize the issues and think belittle the movement? I haven't had any issues, my girlfriend actually shares the majority of my views. That isn't to say that we don't disagree on s…
/r/MensRights13/02/12 05:58 PM
5

Permalink to the suggestion of this reddit if anyone is curious, a lot of people tend to agree with a lot of our arguments but shy away because of how aggressive we can be. http://www.reddit.com/r/AskReddit/comments/pjb4a/which_subreddit_do_you_wish_more_people_knew/c3psv7g
/r/MensRights10/02/12 05:58 PM
12

You could look at the lack of upvotes on those items and the comments and most likely deduce that the majority of the 30,000+ subscribers don't share these views?
/r/MensRights10/02/12 05:48 PM
9

Wait... Isn't this exactly what RadFems want?
/r/MensRights10/02/12 05:49 AM
2

Do you have the entry?
/r/MensRights10/02/12 05:48 AM
2

First time in video though, and it'll stop feminists using the "He was obviously an abuser" line when we point out how ridiculous this sentencing is. And to be fair though, it's better than the alternative sentence he would of got.
/r/MensRights10/02/12 03:08 AM
5

If he's worrying about male progress in STEM fields then maybe he should look at all of the grants, bursaries, and affirmative action programs that actively discriminate against boys and men entering these fields. I know that when I looked at the list of scholarships that I couldn't apply for actually effected my decision on what courses to take.
/r/MensRights10/02/12 12:10 AM
3

Repost to XX, Feminism(s), and SRS then come back and let us know how that goes.
/r/MensRights09/02/12 06:44 PM
9

I rarely take Yahoo answers seriously.
/r/MensRights09/02/12 06:43 PM
13

I don't think this is really a MR issue, more of a Kids these days issue.
/r/MensRights09/02/12 06:34 PM
17

Because the cornerstones of Justice should be ignored? That is, the presumption of innocence until proven guilty.
/r/MensRights09/02/12 05:24 PM
2

I never noticed when I first posted above, reported.
/r/MensRights09/02/12 03:05 PM
2

Mom Could Go to Jail For Keeping Kids Away From Drug-Dealer Dad A North Carolina dad lost his job for doing coke, and he's currently awaiting trial for dealing. But he still has partial custody of his kids — and because she won't let them go to his house, his ex-wife could go to jail. WCNC reports that David Edward Kennedy was fired from his job with the city of Charlotte, NC when he failed a drug test, and in November, he was indicted on federal cocaine trafficking charges. Since that time, his…
/r/MensRights09/02/12 02:43 PM
1

I would disagree, that's like saying if you're anti-Muslim you must be an atheist. (not my sentiment, just how I read the comments.)
/r/MensRights09/02/12 02:39 PM
1

TBH I didn't read the link or anything. I saw where it linked to and I made a suggestion based on that fact alone.
/r/MensRights09/02/12 05:48 AM
1

I'd like to know this myself, I have a real problem with remembering the specific studies and related studies on issues and I often forget to cite them :/
/r/MensRights09/02/12 05:09 AM
2

I can see where you're coming from, I would understand something like not allowing them to bring a video game console or a tonne of Lego but something like an action figure I would disagree with you. I think it mostly depends on the specific gifts.
/r/MensRights09/02/12 05:05 AM
1

STOP FEEDING TROLLS, STOP POSTING ABOUT TROLLS.
/r/MensRights08/02/12 09:45 PM
3

Trolls troll?
/r/MensRights08/02/12 08:04 PM
3

People don't like to challenge their belief set, it's always easier for them to downvote and disregard any argument we make instead of changing what they believe.
/r/MensRights08/02/12 03:43 PM
13

I don't care why they come to this subreddit tbh - downvote, report, ignore.
/r/MensRights08/02/12 03:11 PM
1

But this article is about abuse generally, not abuse that ends in homicide. Abuse is normally carried out by the mother in the majority of abuse cases and the fact is that the general misconception of these violent acts is that the father is normally the aggressor. You can see this line of thought in the comments that I quoted and others on the article. A responsible journalist attempting to create awareness would include these facts so reasonable judgments irt how to cut down on these incidents…
/r/MensRights08/02/12 04:12 AM
49

Please don't link to SRS, they're trolls.
/r/MensRights07/02/12 11:43 PM
4

Hurley emphasized that he would not have ordered such whimsical conditions for Bray, 47, if his domestic violence charge was more serious, or if his wife, who was at the hearing, appeared to be injured or in danger of being harmed. L2Read
/r/MensRights07/02/12 10:28 PM
2

I was more stating how the lack of context in the original article plus the quotes I indicated lead to a perceived problem of father or men in general while leaving women out of the equation. The comment itself isn't the issue but the overall perception of the issue.
/r/MensRights07/02/12 08:00 PM
2

Are you looking at Featured or All replies? I found: Replacement fathers. These were usually the cases that involved a death. Mom gets a new boyfriend (I never saw the genders reversed or changed here but it could happen), boyfriend starts watching kid, boyfriend loses job and becomes caretaker while mom picks up double shift, kid gets beaten/shaken, kid dies of injuries, mom sides with boyfriend at court. this I was physically abused by my asshat of a stepfather when I was young. and this almos…
/r/MensRights07/02/12 07:20 PM
5

If you look through the comments the people who dare to blame anyone normally blame boyfriends, fathers, and step fathers but never put the blame on mothers, girlfriends, or step mothers. I think the omission effects this greatly on how the issue is perceived.
/r/MensRights07/02/12 06:49 PM
3

I think that when GirlWritesWhat posts to the GoodManProject we should try to give the articles as much traffic as possible. In my eyes this would be the only way to change the tone of their site overall.
/r/MensRights07/02/12 02:29 PM
2

Don't be silly, most likely the mothers parents would get custody or the state would take the child.
/r/MensRights07/02/12 02:22 PM
7

Fatalities caused by circumcision accidents may approximate the mortality rate from penile cancer. Wow.
/r/MensRights06/02/12 03:21 AM
8

I'm going to go with not MR.
/r/MensRights06/02/12 03:19 AM
53

I'd give her a piggyback ride, everyone loves piggyback rides.
/r/MensRights03/02/12 10:11 PM
3

I'm happy for you man, grats!
/r/MensRights03/02/12 03:09 PM
5

I guess I have to tell my girlfriend that we can't have sex anymore because it's rape :/
/r/MensRights02/02/12 11:28 PM
1

Really? NICE said it had already used the appropriate methods in its review, and concluded that the number men who would need the drug was too large to consider such agreements. Too many men need the drug so we're going to refuse it? Isn't that sort of fucked up?
/r/MensRights02/02/12 07:47 PM
2

He says there was a culture of violence.
/r/MensRights02/02/12 03:53 AM
3

Welcome to MR!
/r/MensRights01/02/12 10:09 PM
3

I don't think he would specify sons because he doesn't have any. But I guess we can disagree on this point :) Have an upvote
/r/MensRights01/02/12 09:43 PM
6

I upvoted all of your comments with this clarification. I think the people who outright say sexist things against women hurt the credibility of this subreddit but I also believe that most if not all of them are trolls.
/r/MensRights01/02/12 09:40 PM
2

I don't think that would sound right... no one says that. He has daughters and saw a way to connect with a potential voter.
/r/MensRights01/02/12 09:37 PM
2

I'm Canadian so I don't know everything he has said but the statement in the video above just sounds like a father who has daughters and no sons. This in my mind was more of a way to make the lady he was talking to more sympathetic to him. More of an attempt to win a vote if anything.
/r/MensRights01/02/12 09:35 PM
3

My father had two sons, he tells everyone that having sons are better than daughters - I think this is something all parents do.
/r/MensRights01/02/12 09:33 PM
3

I would say that is an inappropriate statement but the one he said in the video you linked isn't. I'm sure if he had sons and talked to someone else who had sons he would say "You can't beat sons" because that would be the 'politically polite' thing to do.
/r/MensRights01/02/12 09:32 PM
3

Not really, It's about an 8 year old girl and her 3 year old brother... How is it emasculating to follow your older sibling around and want to be more like them? That just sounds like normal childhood to me.
/r/MensRights01/02/12 08:15 PM
12

I watched the Google+ Hangout, it was more of a throw away comment to a mother of 2 daughters who was asking him questions... Not a MRA issue imo.
/r/MensRights01/02/12 08:12 PM
2

I'm uncomfortable condemning this without the hard numbers on what the pay for men and women were before and after this pay raise.
/r/MensRights01/02/12 02:15 PM
3

So? He likes his dick. He even said that he doesn't know what he'd do if he had kids so this is really a moot point as he hasn't been forced to decide.
/r/MensRights31/01/12 11:58 PM
13

I think that she was playing a fucked up character in a fucked up psychological thriller. I don't think the intent of Hard Candy is to show her character as a good person or as someone who should be held in high esteem but rather as someone who's fucked up in the head torturing and another person who's fucked up in the head. I would actually recommend watching the movie to a person who likes thrillers since it's a good movie imo. **EDIT: This comment is in regards to Hard Candy
/r/MensRights31/01/12 06:30 PM
9

Different people have different standards? I personally don't like the generalization of groups either and I tend to downvote comments that do.
/r/MensRights31/01/12 05:09 PM
4

His response to the criticism has been defiant and unrepentant. "That's not a man's mouth or a woman's mouth, that's art. They were damned expensive and they're staying where they are and that's final." AND The urinals were designed by a woman, Dutch artist Meike van Schijndel
/r/MensRights31/01/12 04:00 PM
1

I don't have Facebook, can someone post the original comment and the most "liked" response please?
/r/MensRights31/01/12 03:53 PM
5

See the sidebar.
/r/MensRights31/01/12 03:50 PM
9

I upvoted this thread on the condition that people read this comment.
/r/MensRights31/01/12 03:48 PM
1

But from society it still is.
/r/MensRights31/01/12 02:11 AM
3

He got rid of Anna because of the legal liability he's under just having her on the same field as him. You think he would want the mother to think she saw something? What if the girl came up and hugged him? Coaches aren't allowed to have physical contact with youth at all except for high fives so a hug and an over protective parent can ruin his life.
/r/MensRights31/01/12 02:09 AM
7

recently been invited to take part in a debate at University College London (UCL), on the prevalence of misandry in academia and society How much you want to bet this will be canceled when the local campus feminist groups protest it?
/r/MensRights30/01/12 10:29 PM
1

I'm for this but I don't enough about managing a wiki to help :/
/r/MensRights30/01/12 03:07 AM
1

I agree wholeheartedly with this sentiment. We shouldn't have to reduce ourselves to this level to have our arguments carry weight.
/r/MensRights29/01/12 03:47 AM
5

I don't think you should be downvoted for what I perceived as an honest question.
/r/MensRights28/01/12 06:08 AM
3

Done and done.
/r/MensRights28/01/12 06:00 AM
4

Yale Quarterback Accused in Vaguest Sexual Assault Story Ever Yale's star quarterback seems to have withdrawn his Rhodes scholarship application because he was accused of sexual assault. I say "seems to" because the story is incredibly vague — and that might be Yale's fault. According to the Times, here's what we do know: Patrick Witt was scheduled to interview for the Rhodes on the very day of the Harvard-Yale game. It was a compelling story of a young man's conflicting ambitions! Ultimately, h…
/r/MensRights27/01/12 05:57 PM
2

It was her security guard... I think it's his job?
/r/MensRights26/01/12 08:57 PM
9

I want an initiative to increase women in these fields so they can understand what "Male Privilege" actually does to a mans body and mind.
/r/MensRights26/01/12 04:59 PM
5

So? Bad people do and say bad things, I don't see anyone endorsing her - in fact people seem to hate her.
/r/MensRights26/01/12 04:39 AM
12

They're trolls. report, downvote, ignore?
/r/MensRights26/01/12 03:32 AM
2

I agree! I posted that in this thread as well. I do think we should try to read it on GMP to show them that a more MR point of view will garner support though.
/r/MensRights25/01/12 06:31 PM
3

This!
/r/MensRights25/01/12 04:44 PM
4

It's more that it was reprinted yesterday on GMP. I think it's a good step forward allowing for a more MR view to be posted along side their other works.
/r/MensRights25/01/12 04:43 PM
5

It's GirlWritesWhat.... I would suggest clicking the link and giving it a read, or follow the link directly to her blog in my other post.
/r/MensRights25/01/12 03:23 PM
4

http://owningyourshit.blogspot.com/2011/05/why-i-advocate-for-mens-rights.html
/r/MensRights25/01/12 03:19 PM
5

Direct link: http://goodmenproject.com/featured-content/why-i-advocate-for-mens-rights/
/r/MensRights25/01/12 03:08 PM
19

Further information: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/howaboutthat/9033897/Police-contacted-over-Bath-road-rage-viral-video.html
/r/MensRights25/01/12 12:23 AM
5

Remember every click is $ for the writer. http://jezebel.com/5878537/why-i-punched-a-stranger
/r/MensRights24/01/12 04:52 AM
12

Response to this article: Why I Punched a Stranger I punched someone on the street last night, which is a first for me. My girlfriend and I were walking along Harvard Avenue, a heavily trafficked main street in Allston. We were headed home from a party about a fifteen minutes from our place. In the one block between Commonwealth and Brighton, three separate men or groups of men verbally harassed us - a very typical female experience, practically guaranteed for lesbian couples. They said things l…
/r/MensRights24/01/12 03:44 AM
1

I've seen this video spammed in threads before with the response from ignatiusloyola asking for them to be reported due to the amount of spam they were pushing into our subreddit.
/r/MensRights23/01/12 10:29 PM
0

This video has been deleted from this subreddit so many times now... Report and Downvote.
/r/MensRights23/01/12 07:19 PM
11

How about boys only biology and chemistry classes so more boys can get into female dominated college programs like pharmacy? Smart women seem to be doing right well in the highly competitive medical schools also. This comment was responded to by men saying that they didn't feel hindered by the female presence being the majority then turn around and say the opposite about STEM fields. I don't see how segregating our youth into gendered classes would help them to learn how to work with the opposit…
/r/MensRights23/01/12 05:50 AM
1

Why would we care?
/r/MensRights23/01/12 05:28 AM
2

People who are threatened with the complete ruination of their future often get a little twitchy.
/r/MensRights22/01/12 07:27 PM
3

It's a parody of that behavior.
/r/MensRights22/01/12 05:12 PM
5

Please wait till a picture of her holding the head comes out rather than claims of the picture existing and the selling price being $5000. http://www.etonline.com/news/118286_Dog_Walker_Did_Not_Take_Picture_with_Severed_Head/index.html
/r/MensRights21/01/12 07:04 PM
6

BDSM culture is alive and good? Are we going to decry people who enjoy ball gags? I don't think MR belongs in a persons bedroom.
/r/MensRights20/01/12 11:51 PM
13

Girlwriteswhat makes amazing videos.
/r/MensRights20/01/12 09:44 PM
2

You know, I just hate seeing men being objectified as tall, blond hair, blue eyes, muscular sex machines, I think it's degrading to men everywhere >.>
/r/MensRights20/01/12 08:05 PM
10

I hate how romance novels are geared towards women and cater to their fantasies! I demand equality even if the novels I want created wouldn't sell as well!
/r/MensRights20/01/12 02:21 PM
2

Bad people say bad things?
/r/MensRights20/01/12 04:56 AM
7

Sadly I think it'll take well spoken women speaking within the MR movement before the majority of people start listening to the rest of us.
/r/MensRights20/01/12 02:06 AM
3

You'll get used to random downvotes, some redditors come to r/MensRights just to downvote everything.
/r/MensRights19/01/12 02:55 PM
1

Full response: Good day, This is in response to your email in which you requested information concerning the picture depicted on the new $100 polymer bank note. The theme we’ve chosen to showcase on this bank note represents the history and the future of medical research in Canada. Canadians have long been at the frontiers of medical research and as a result have helped to save millions of lives worldwide. Notable Canadian contributions include pioneering the use of insulin to treat diabetes, DN…
/r/MensRights18/01/12 05:39 AM
1

The response I got from the Bank of Canada: The microscope is a Zeiss Axioplan 2, currently used for cutting-edge health research in Canada. The image of a researcher using a microscope depicts Canada’s long-standing commitment to medical research. The researcher pictured on this note was rendered from a composite of images and is not any particular person.
/r/MensRights18/01/12 05:38 AM
0

You're right, sorry. I tried not to spend more time than I had to on their site so I missed that.
/r/MensRights17/01/12 02:15 PM
6

Also, please don't link directly to Jezebel as they get ad revenue per view.
/r/MensRights17/01/12 04:42 AM
3

A little old but: He Wants to Jizz on Your Face, but Not Why You Think "Facials are degrading — and that's why they're so hot." So says America's leading sex columnist Dan Savage about the act of ejaculating semen on to someone's face. But the appeal of the facial can't be summed up with that single term. Rather, this act that's become the standard coda in porn is about much more than the longing to dominate or humiliate a sex partner. Understanding what makes it such a ubiquitous trope in adult…
/r/MensRights17/01/12 04:41 AM
20

All I read is a judge declaring that women don't have agency in the UK and should be treated like perpetual victims.
/r/MensRights16/01/12 09:55 PM
3

I agree with this. They might act like feminists on reddit but they're not really that important or influential.
/r/MensRights16/01/12 03:38 PM
2

Can we get scanned text?
/r/MensRights16/01/12 01:59 PM
3

And they'll argue that they're not the face of Feminism on Reddit. Which they don't intend to be but they end up becoming through their subscribers and actions.
/r/MensRights16/01/12 01:56 PM
1

Thank you, I've been thinking this a while and you have stated it better than I ever could.
/r/MensRights15/01/12 05:52 PM
6

... It's Hugo Schwyzer, what did you expect?
/r/MensRights14/01/12 07:23 PM
2

In my opinion, however, shaming is not inherently wrong. I've heard this said by a lot of feminists to explain their inflammatory language, I don't think we should be acting like them.
/r/MensRights14/01/12 07:11 PM
3

I don't, it's more inflammatory and makes outsiders look at us as the bad guys.
/r/MensRights14/01/12 07:09 PM
2

I agree, I would help the person if I could no matter what the gender.
/r/MensRights14/01/12 07:07 PM
12

I'm not the biggest fan of this but it does outline the absurdity of the "Men can stop rape" feminist line so I'm not willing to oppose this.
/r/MensRights14/01/12 07:01 PM
1

This please.
/r/MensRights14/01/12 05:38 AM
2

Not sure where you're located but where I am that would be Sexual Assault if you audibly told her to stop groping you and she continued.
/r/MensRights14/01/12 12:59 AM
4

Press charges, if you have video proof you might actually win!
/r/MensRights14/01/12 12:14 AM
1

Watch out for that black bag.
/r/MensRights14/01/12 12:13 AM
1

I would take that as long as it didn't have any long term debilitating side effects. FEAR ME O WIENERED ONES Got an upvote from me because that made me laugh.
/r/MensRights13/01/12 11:48 PM
5

And thats why I get paid an extra 5 cents an hour - it's a surcharge. I like that bit.
/r/MensRights13/01/12 02:42 PM
13

So we're going to act like victims when a 70 year old sends a 15 year old nude pictures? What are we, feminists? He's accused of chatting with an Apex teenager online, asking her to pose for nude photos and sending her nude photos. This is more than flirting.
/r/MensRights13/01/12 02:37 PM
1

I think it would be good to help define the boundaries of MR and what MR stands for. I know I often feel out of place when I'm told that my left leaning politics is harmful to MR even though I think they don't matter in this context.
/r/MensRights13/01/12 02:34 PM
2

As a Canadian MRA I agree with this. My political beliefs are to the left but I agree with almost every issue that gets posted here.
/r/MensRights13/01/12 01:32 AM
15

they can relate to the bigger issue of women This seems a little scary that you see women as an issue.
/r/MensRights13/01/12 01:25 AM
3

How many feminists exist?
/r/MensRights12/01/12 10:22 PM
1

Did they make a video in regards to this? Parental abductions go unpunished
/r/MensRights12/01/12 02:55 AM
2

I disagree with your views but I agree that this troll is the lowest of the low for attempting to slander your name worse than it already is on this subreddit.
/r/MensRights12/01/12 02:29 AM
3

Transcription available?
/r/MensRights12/01/12 02:14 AM
1

Send them an email! http://www.bankofcanada.ca/ [email protected]
/r/MensRights12/01/12 01:34 AM
8

I'm a leader of a Venturer Crew (Older than Scouts but still a part of Scouting) in Canada and we don't have any rules against our members being Gay or an Atheist. Is that an actual rule under Boy Scouts of America (The U.S Scouts)?
/r/MensRights12/01/12 12:48 AM
2

Report and ignore - best we can do.
/r/MensRights11/01/12 06:45 PM
26

Self immolation is the most extreme of protests and should highlight the pain and suffering this man was put through by his ex-wife.
/r/MensRights11/01/12 06:44 PM
10

I love her videos.
/r/MensRights11/01/12 03:09 AM
14

I don't think people will get this without a '/s' sadly.
/r/MensRights10/01/12 10:14 PM
7

This isn't the normal GMP feminist news that I normally suspect from them, this is actually a good article and I recommend people read it.
/r/MensRights10/01/12 07:57 PM
0

This.
/r/MensRights10/01/12 04:55 PM
5

Text of the site: My Ex stabbed me in the shoulder with a steak knife when I told her I was breaking up with her. When I called the cops and they came she told them I tried to attack her. I spent 36 hours in jail. No charges were filed but I did get 12 stitches and a scar to remember her by. I’ve broken up over the phone ever since. Editted for formatting
/r/MensRights10/01/12 02:42 PM
9

A Sub Trope of Double Standard.
/r/MensRights10/01/12 01:59 PM
1

We're Canadian, normally more left than the majority of the U.S.
/r/MensRights10/01/12 01:54 AM
1

Some of the comments below are depressing and spread mis-information that has been debunked :/
/r/MensRights09/01/12 05:48 PM
4

I love your words, please make more.
/r/MensRights07/01/12 08:31 PM
15

lots of MRAs talk about how much they'd like to inflict pain on women I've never wanted to inflict pain on someone because of their gender, I'm actually offended that the author believes that all 29,000 of us thinks like this.
/r/MensRights07/01/12 04:25 AM
3

RTFA - Read the FAQ
/r/MensRights06/01/12 02:48 PM
5

The only part of the advice I didn't like was calling MR an "Ugly Obsession" but they may be saying that because it's causing stress in the relationship with his daughter. I can see that the daughter most likely doesn't like MRA's but the Advice Column seemed to be only commenting on the stress his "Lectures" (daughters words) are creating with his kids. I think telling the daughter to talk to him privately to stop discussing it is appropriate, I've done this in regards to other topics with my f…
/r/MensRights05/01/12 01:26 AM
3

As a Canadian I was looking at this confused for a while, thanks.
/r/MensRights05/01/12 01:18 AM
1

This is just more of the “men should be more like women, because women are more well adjusted than men” nonsense
/r/MensRights03/01/12 03:09 AM
3

Not a mens rights issue... or anyones issue really.
/r/MensRights29/12/11 07:20 AM
3

I don't always agree with what you say, but here you're on the mark.
/r/MensRights22/12/11 05:28 PM
1

Irony - I don't think that word means what you think it means
/r/MensRights21/12/11 05:25 AM
0

Deaths caused by AIDS peeked in 1996, it was slowly climbing since the late 80's. Afterwards it dropped to less than half due to new health awareness, testing, and the new development of protease inhibitors. If you're lowering yourself to such low standards as to attack me personally and refuse to acknowledge something that has occurred and is well documented... You're no better than the RadFems out there.
/r/MensRights21/12/11 05:16 AM
1

5% don't have properly mobile sperm at 1 year, seems like an acceptable risk imo though.
/r/MensRights21/12/11 02:29 AM
0

The women won't be able to transmit the STD to the man? Like I said further down, I think the man should be able to get his sperm tested and contained in a proper biohazard container without going through the FDA.
/r/MensRights21/12/11 02:26 AM
8

Good to hear of someone in my province making ground.
/r/MensRights21/12/11 01:54 AM
0

As I corrected, I ment the 90s.
/r/MensRights21/12/11 01:03 AM
0

Wait, did you just say the AIDS pandemic didn't happen? And that the moon landing was fake? *I ment 90s, I have fat fingers
/r/MensRights21/12/11 12:52 AM
0

I actually wouldn't be against STD tests being a part of your normal routine physicals for everyone. I think being informed on the subject is very important.
/r/MensRights20/12/11 11:53 PM
0

I never read his personal FAQ on his page until just now, they never stated that he only did local deliveries. I in fact did RTFA, I did not go through his entire FAQ as I wasn't interested in buying his sperm. You're incredible offensive to someone who's talking about concern for public safety and wanting to avoid the AIDS pandemic you had in the US in the 60s. People wonder why we're usually seen in a negative light, this is it.
/r/MensRights20/12/11 11:50 PM
0

I see it less of proving you're innocent, more of proving you're clean and safe. Places where prostitution is legal it's required that you show you're not trafficked and that you are clean (Nevada brothels).
/r/MensRights20/12/11 11:46 PM
-1

He would gain the flight, that would constitute payment (payment doesn't have to be monetary). I never noticed that he only did local pickup, I just read the gizmodo article.
/r/MensRights20/12/11 11:44 PM
-1

"Handing them a sterile cup of sperm" isn't what he was doing though, it wasn't sterile, indicated that it may contain STDs, and I'm sure it wasn't packaged in a biohazard container to ensure the safety of the person delivering the sample. Again, I'm not saying that he shouldn't be able to give his sperm away without going through the FDA, I'm saying that he should be able to guarantee that he isn't spreading HIV and that he isn't putting a poor delivery guy in an unsafe work environment.
/r/MensRights20/12/11 10:25 PM
1

I guess I'm just a little too far removed to really comment on this. I'm not an American so I'll attempt to refrain from commenting on the U.S's internal politics.
/r/MensRights20/12/11 10:20 PM
1

If he can convince someone to pay for his ticket to fly there and have sex with them I think that would be prostitution and would carry legal consequence. Are you saying that you're alright with sending potentially hazardous material in the mail without any proper oversight, regulation, or protection?
/r/MensRights20/12/11 10:08 PM
2

Technically if you donate your egg you do have to register it.
/r/MensRights20/12/11 10:05 PM
-2

I don't think it matters who you have for your President. I don't think anyone would be able to mount a campaign against an organization that is for the public health: "The Food and Drug Administration (FDA or USFDA) is an agency of the United States Department of Health and Human Services, one of the United States federal executive departments. The FDA is responsible for protecting and promoting public health through the regulation and supervision of food safety, tobacco products, dietary suppl…
/r/MensRights20/12/11 10:04 PM
3

Out of curiosity, do the majority of people here disagree that the public safety should be kept in mind by requiring testing and proper containment of bodily fluids being shipped across the country/world?
/r/MensRights20/12/11 10:01 PM
1

Mail order brides are illigal where I am, so I'm not sure if that argument has too much weight against me. I also don't think he could fly to each of his clients and have sex with them, it wouldn't be feasible. This is all about containing potential health risks. If he could verify that his sperm was safe and contained in a proper biohazard container then I would agree that this ruling is unfair. I just mentioned to SpykerSpeed that I think the FDA should allow him to go to an independent clinic…
/r/MensRights20/12/11 09:15 PM
3

I think the person should have the ability to get it tested from another source and have it not only certified as safe but also verified to be in a safe biohazard container (Don't want that breaking in the FedEx truck). I'm not saying that I think that this is the best way to handle this issue, I'm saying that they made this choice in the interest public health.
/r/MensRights20/12/11 09:09 PM
7

I don't have any on hand (I've mostly seen them on this reddit) but a quick Google search found this: http://www.dispatch.com/content/stories/local/2008/08/16/janecrane.ART_ART_08-16-08_B1_T0B1RSR.html http://www.tampabay.com/news/courts/article1183449.ece
/r/MensRights20/12/11 08:14 PM
0

Craigslisters don't often leave their own state let alone city looking for sex while the person in the article could be sending his sperm to multiple states/provinces/countries. I would have the same reservations around blood, spit, stool, and urine samples.
/r/MensRights20/12/11 08:04 PM
2

I agree with this.
/r/MensRights20/12/11 08:02 PM
7

I would rather everyone to be oppressed equally than one demographic receive additional rights to the detriment of another.
/r/MensRights20/12/11 07:45 PM
7

I think he's talking about the actual rape victims, some of whom were underage when they were raped, who are ordered to pay child support because "the child shouldn't be punished for the actions of the mother".
/r/MensRights20/12/11 07:43 PM
8

I agree with this. If he uses condoms does she split the cost of that with him?
/r/MensRights20/12/11 07:41 PM
-3

I would agree that it shouldn't be illegal as long as you can verify that the 'Night Worker' wasn't trafficked. Maybe a licensing and monthly screening to ensure this?
/r/MensRights20/12/11 07:21 PM
3

It's different because he's using the internet to propagate it to a larger area than he would have access to through traditional sex. It's weighing the potential public health risk over large geographical areas against his personal freedoms and rights. Like I said, I'm not sure if I have issues with this - it's a gray area inbetween public safety and personal freedom. **edit to correct spelling
/r/MensRights20/12/11 07:12 PM
15

I'm not sure if I have issues with this. He is spreading a bodily fluid which may or may not contain communicable diseases. I think the FDA is right to say that they need to have the ability to test these fluids for public health reasons. In my mind it's the same reason why you don't see spittoons anymore.
/r/MensRights20/12/11 07:06 PM
3

You say "You people need to get to work"... What have you done? What do you expect others to do for you?
/r/MensRights20/12/11 04:19 PM
1

I don't have the channel anymore, It was taken down a long time ago. Sorry
/r/MensRights19/12/11 02:13 AM
3

To be honest, I'm fine with this. The only time a counter-suite could work is if he was found Innocent, not acquitted. The jury had doubt which acquitted him, but that would mean that enough doubt exists as to if she lied.
/r/MensRights19/12/11 01:59 AM
4

I think he's commenting on mothers who do and defend doing it to their children.
/r/MensRights16/12/11 12:54 AM
–

From the comments: "the names of these are Johnna Cadena, Allie Bailey, and Ariana De La Torre." This is easily Google-able information tied to the youtube account they posted the video from.
/r/MensRights15/12/11 09:10 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter