TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ChadWolf98 Archive

View 4 posts and 977 comments by ChadWolf98 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Yea I didn't include rich or successful people because they have access to dating/sleeping with real women. Imo they, and good looking men will also have bots. Either because they can cook, or because it will be enjoyable for them too. Basically Detroit Become Human will happen imo, at least the use part (dunno about the AI uprising part)
/r/AllPillDebate16/04/23 07:58 PM
6

Even if it wont have a big impact (Imo it will) then worst case it will be a type of quality sex toy. Best case, it will be an alternative for people who dont want or cant have a human partner. I wouldnt restict it for below average men only. Probably rich or successful people will have androids too.
/r/AllPillDebate16/04/23 03:48 PM
10

yes
/r/AllPillDebate16/04/23 02:07 PM
-13

How it would affect society? What if too many men become baby mama makers? How will the state handle it? It will lead to a major tax increase which will be paid by mostly men taxpayers
/r/MensRights09/11/22 02:00 PM
1

There is a reason foreskin is on the male body. Any body alteration, regardless of what, which isnt for a needed medical reason is automatically mutilation for me, which is deeply anti scientific and thus earns a strong disdain from me.
/r/MensRights06/11/22 11:36 AM
1

> Society as a group* I explicity said men. Women as a group get more handouts than their net tax paid into the system > than a some bucks from the state while some are getting thousand dollars Women as a group get way more from the state in handouts that single moms as a group get child support from men > Ban abortion could lead to more problems Not only it saves thousands of men from lifelong mental anguish over a wanted child, it also makes women more responsible in their sexual decisions
/r/MensRights05/11/22 08:35 PM
1

Marriage mostly worked for centuries, and was generally a mutually beneficial, aka symbiotic relationship between men and women. Only recently became parasitic in countries that enable it
/r/MensRights05/11/22 07:53 PM
2

Men as a group will have to pay for children anyway, either child support or through taxes (men pay the vast majority of taxes, and they get a small minority of handouts) Even if you could abandon a child legally, you, as a male, would be on the hook throught other men's children: through added taxxes. You already are partially, it would only excerbate the problem. Ban abortion. That would level the playing field for men who want to be single dads. Strongly encourage adoption for couples who don…
/r/MensRights05/11/22 07:46 PM
1

Reddit is very left wing. The major left wing subs are extremely feminist and thus anti men However, I see men rights arguments ( no child support in cases, violence against men, dads being the butt of the joke etc) are getting traction
/r/MensRights05/11/22 03:31 PM
1

Min wage jobs are mostly physical labor jobs right? I assume some phys jobs pay better than min wage
/r/MensRights03/11/22 06:33 PM
4

1, why can you only work in min wage jobs? 2, get in contact with a lawyer who is affiliated with a men right organisation? 3, You may be able to find a lawyer who agrees on a payment plan where you pay the fee not upfront, where you agree to a higher fee but later payments (a bit similar to a mortgage). Assuming your case is strong, you could argue that when you get your sec clearance back you will be able to pay the fee.
/r/MensRights03/11/22 12:36 PM
3

"Your date is a private company(on). He can do whatever he wants"
/r/AntiFeminists02/11/22 01:26 PM
1

Irrelevant, since no fault divorce.
/r/MensRights01/11/22 03:34 AM
1

Well, if a catastrophe gonna happen, thats where society will be. We may not make the same mistake again with radfeminists after the catastrophe ended, but for that humanity first have to survive the event
/r/MensRights26/10/22 11:04 PM
1

I have the attitude of the Norse Gods. They know they will lose Ragnarök, but still prepare and dont give up. Also in my opinion men's situation is improving. The MRA movement is getting some traction, some countries get more rightwing, while feminists are bogged down by infighting (Mostly TERF vs trans) Not to mention, tho I hope it wont happen, if a catastrophe or famine or revolution or civil war happens the world will very quickly be back at the original traditional way of life.
/r/MensRights26/10/22 04:05 PM
8

Two x sub are full of stories of women about their bf or husband (most of it is men =bad, some posts are how good their bf is) Merely virtue signaling. They crave attention and money from men. Just like they hate conservative men yet stories after stories about how hot rightwing men are, "I hooked up with a Trump supporter and I liked it" etc Foreign women are young, exotic and hot, thus competition. Feminists simply want 1 sided relationships where they get the attention and money from men but …
/r/MensRights24/10/22 07:26 PM
1

I am not arguing with anyone who had one but what is the appeal? If you are in an Ltr there are better options (IUD) If you live for ONS's then you still have to wear a condom due to STDs. So I dont see why its good at all.
/r/MensRights24/10/22 04:38 PM
0

Well, for thousands of years women were more important sociology wise because the number of fertile women (which is basically 15 year of their lives) was the important number And it changes only slowly. And ofc another force, named feminism, slows this down
/r/MensRights24/10/22 04:23 PM
84

Young, probably hot exotic women = competition When young immigrant men come, they clap. The reason is very simple, I let you think about it
/r/MensRights24/10/22 04:13 PM
2

I dont really care about her and find her trashy, and I dont know what really goes on with them. If abuse happens and/or he pimps out his own wife, it is gravely immoral or illegal. If it is really illegal acts like abuse she has my sympathy and support taking action against the abuser.
/r/MensRights17/10/22 11:49 PM
0

You can call labor rights not upholding freedom of association, but I guess you dont have the same opinion if someone is fired for being gay or black. Oh right, your country doesnt allow that right? What about the racist or homophobe business owners freedom to not associate? The US is a great country, but it is a laughing stock for labor rights. Or the lack of them. And get this: if my freedom of speech or my right to work is in danger, for my opinion, I couldnt give the slightest faint of shit …
/r/MensRights17/10/22 11:03 PM
-7

I am an atheist. We arent living in the same country. My opinion has 0 effect on your rights.
/r/MensRights17/10/22 10:57 PM
5

Personally I said nothing about abrigation of their rights. Making a statement against a political movement, one with strong connection to feminism is a human right, called freedom of speech. You are too US centered. If someone in my country is fired for his or her political opinion that would be illegal for 2 reasons: 1, Unlike the US you cannot really be fired for non work performance related reason, a simple non liberal opinion certainly wouldnt count as a legitimate reason to be fired. You c…
/r/MensRights17/10/22 07:09 PM
-10

Several countries have civil partnership which is basically the same as marriage just not in name. Anything else can be easily supplanted by a will or a power of attorney
/r/MensRights17/10/22 07:04 PM
3

What type of sex someone finds disgusting is entirely preference and often not even a conscious decision. For example: Some folks are ok with bdsm and some find it disgusting.
/r/MensRights17/10/22 07:03 PM
1

Define homophobia.
/r/MensRights17/10/22 03:27 PM
5

Lot of redditors, especially liberals, confuse homophobia with bejng against the LGBTQ movement, ehich is a political movement, thus its criticism is the same as criticising the republican or green party. I know liberal and conservative people, and the vast majority, (read: 99%) have 0 issue with gays existing. Or having rights. Or not being beaten. However, a lot of conservatives do have an issue with it being overbearing and the grave violation of freedom of speech/work opportunities if you da…
/r/MensRights17/10/22 03:25 PM
22

You dont have to but some men wants to be one. The option should exist and not as a third parent after the state
/r/MensRights17/10/22 01:34 PM
1

Women benefit from divorce much more even if the marriage is good. Meanwhile most men can expect monetary losses so they probably divorce as a last option
/r/MensRights17/10/22 01:19 AM
1

Husbands cant legally leave chud The state makes them pay child support But women can literally kill unborn to get out of parenthood
/r/MensRights13/10/22 03:49 PM
1

You will be pregnant And you will be happy Have sex femcel
/r/MensRights13/10/22 09:58 AM
3

protip: make it into some feminist type response like: women are so strong and independent that they dont need a man's help like the queen she is! and see heads spin
/r/AntiFeminists11/10/22 08:01 PM
2

Dont be dramatic like the wokies are. People should be able to read radical opinions. They should, but then they should be allowed to read anti woke opinions too. WHich they cant. The problem is that its lopsided. YOur part is censored, their radicalism is not. Lol you really think reddit admins care about hate towards men? Well if you dont do a think it def wont change. Which makes it all the more pointless when MRAs demand that feminist subs get banned. I dont want it banned. I want the rules …
/r/MensRights11/10/22 07:54 PM
3

Except they are propped up so every time new users join they radicalise them. It wouldnt be a problem if not for literally promoting these like auto adding all women users into twox and stuff like that. I hate censorship just as you do, but in this system there is censorship. Ask for better treatment for yourself in the current system and try to vhange the system
/r/MensRights11/10/22 04:40 PM
7

Until cancel culture stops yes. Since Reddit is curating a censored safe place instead of a free speech one, lets make men feel valued too. The second censorship stops against rightwing values ubder the guise of stop hate I am ok with femcels not being censored. I hate hypocrisy.
/r/MensRights11/10/22 03:39 PM
1

"Ah, don't hate me 'cause I'm beautiful,. Maybe if you got rid of that old yee-yee ass haircut you got you'd get some bitches on your dick. Oh, better yet, maybe Tanisha'll call your dog-ass if she ever stop fuckin' with that brain surgeon or lawyer she fucking with. "
/r/MensRights08/10/22 11:15 AM
2

Violent crimes. Ones that hurt others. Not victimless crimes
/r/MensRights07/10/22 01:14 PM
1

Western europe, in part, are even worse because the even bigger safety net then the US which funds these orgs. Imo central europe and eastern europe is strarting to crack.
/r/MensRights07/10/22 12:46 PM
1

I am absolutely on board with personal responsibility but you cant blame the individual only. You are right, many men able to handle the loneliness. But some dont, and they turn criminal and society only blames the individual instead of reforming itself.
/r/MensRights07/10/22 12:43 PM
1

Do you live in a big city or in a rural place?
/r/MensRights07/10/22 11:05 AM
4

While I think many people would be better if there would be someone to talk to and your effort is commendable, I feel that the problem is systemic. In short, just a few decades ago you had to compete with only men at the workplace. Then domestic men and women. Today? The whole world thanks to remote working. But same with dating. You almost have to compete with the whole world and this only benefits the top worker or top man dating wise. Monogamy worked because even less successful man could get…
/r/MensRights07/10/22 11:00 AM
1

I wouldnt. My life is more important than any country, especially an anti male modern one. Maybe it would be a wake up call to governments when nobody would stand up for it unless its a country that treats its men good. Countries that strongly favor women can expect women to defend it.
/r/MensRights07/10/22 10:45 AM
-2

I only say it because I dont agree with the draft. I dont think it should be a requirement for voting. And I would abolish the draft if I could So given this, if you could archieve voting rights without bejng drafted, would you?
/r/MensRights06/10/22 11:04 PM
-4

And it was men who allowed them to get the right without the responsibility
/r/MensRights06/10/22 05:01 PM
-1

Og feminists were much more moderate
/r/MensRights06/10/22 05:00 PM
9

Later yes. Imo og feminists was right in wanting equal rights
/r/MensRights06/10/22 04:03 PM
33

They were right about wanting equal legal rights.
/r/MensRights06/10/22 10:12 AM
2

1, Imo when women gained equal legal rights and feminists switched to social rights where women already had an advantage. Like demanding acceptance for promiscous women just because part of society thinks its ok for men to be promiscous. (Imo the 2 cases are very different because biology) 2, what is mainstream at that time. Now I feel its the man hating type is the mainstream and the pro equality even for men is the minority. Given that I'd call the latter group egalitarians. 3, in short: dont.…
/r/MensRights06/10/22 01:15 AM
1

Same applies to you. I never said I speak for anyone else then me
/r/MensRights05/10/22 11:25 PM
1

You said "you dont speak the rest of us" which is untrue if those men's votes are getting counted
/r/MensRights05/10/22 10:43 PM
16

If you not involved nothing will happen. Nobody will remember that you did not entered into the fray so this option is even more appealing If you are safe you should imo call the police but basically it. Addendum: sometimes even the "victim" is angry to the man. In Europe it happened multiple times when a roma man was beating a roma woman and the (non roma) man interwened, both the roma man and the woman was angry about it because it was some family matter? And they generally take offense when a…
/r/MensRights05/10/22 07:37 PM
14

The only realistic option if someone pulls a knife is to run away. Word. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kvlrnc7hlQI
/r/MensRights05/10/22 05:32 PM
1

https://wisvetsmuseum.com/blog/suffrage-through-service-how-military-service-expanded-voting-rights/ https://www.quora.com/Did-mens-voting-rights-rely-on-military-conscription-and-were-women-allowed-to-vote-under-the-same-requirements Granted its not entirely clear, but one of the arguments was back then, from women and men who opposed womens right to vote that they dont have to go to war, and on the other hand, if they have to vote they will have to go to war
/r/MensRights05/10/22 03:24 PM
1

Unironically I think it will happen either a few decades after some collapse if things normalise again or in the future when all needs are met and there is no real advantage in being a liar or scummy
/r/MensRights05/10/22 02:13 PM
2

Luckily I was into politics before I was swayed by mainstream media, before that I did not care about politics at all. I agree with stuff like equal rights and find it scummy when a specific jobs pays less to women but I utterly deny that there is systemic woman hatred or patriarchy.
/r/MensRights05/10/22 02:11 PM
59

Every one of these women can have a knife and stab you. Even if you are a martial artist and could take on all 10 women its very risky.
/r/MensRights05/10/22 02:06 PM
2

Its hardly a stretch. When you pay taxes, especially if you have a physical job, you work about a third of a year or even half a year just for the government's benefit.
/r/MensRights05/10/22 02:02 PM
2

God knows, we need all the help we can get. And how you respond to this: after 50 years of stfu, why would men care? Lets make it another 50 years of stfu and let strong independent women save themselves by pulling themselves out of the ocean by their own hair.
/r/MensRights05/10/22 02:00 PM
2

Lets say I am pro life and I vote for an abortion ban. What you gonna do? My vote is getting counted. 10 pro life men and 9 pro choice women votes, what gonna happen? A ban.
/r/MensRights05/10/22 01:56 PM
3

What kind of person would I be to walk away from my own flesh and blood, as if they were nothing? What kind of person would kill their unborn?
/r/MensRights05/10/22 01:55 PM
1

Yes. I already risk it even when its legal. In fact anything I do which improves my chances to get laid also improves the chance to be baby trapped
/r/MensRights05/10/22 01:53 PM
6

Most brutal take: voting was originally connected to military service so any country has male only draft could have male only voting
/r/MensRights05/10/22 01:52 PM
4

Actually, abortion being legal is little benefit to men, while it not being kegal at least benefits those who want to be fathers.
/r/MensRights05/10/22 01:51 PM
1

Dont do it. In a democratic system you can vote for anything. Its not like they check if you have a uterus at the voting poll. I am pro life and vote for pro life politicians. Hoes mad? Idc
/r/MensRights05/10/22 01:49 PM
1

I would want professionally trained, motivated, loyal and tough people. None of this is true for conscripted aka forced infantry.
/r/MensRights28/09/22 02:07 PM
2

So why not try the same method with society then. Ask prime treatment for men. Be a men rights advocate. Ask for a first rate apple for men. I already found my way. Which is no free service. No free labor. No free help. Society doesnt deserve it. And this policy includes no draft. Luckily my country has none but the second it does I am hopping as many borders as needed.
/r/MensRights28/09/22 01:07 AM
2

You may even be able to post on yt just keep copies
/r/MensRights27/09/22 01:57 PM
2

And I would not have it any other way. Lets try this in other areas in life. Work at a business with this attitude. They pay you little, belittle you, make you work hard, weekends and unpaid overtime. You get some second rate apple tho on every 4th friday ( fruit day). Oh its also a job where you have to shovel shit. When do you apply?
/r/MensRights27/09/22 01:55 PM
8

Yeah, for about 5 years they pretend to be trad wives then return to the same feminist the second things have normalised a bit.
/r/MensRights27/09/22 01:50 PM
10

What will I return to? At best, articles about how bad the white man are(even after saving the female journalist's ass) At worst, a wasteland
/r/MensRights27/09/22 01:49 PM
1

Looks like its time for another SC lawsuit then. The last was dropped because congress was on the verge of deciding on it. Do you have an article about it?
/r/MensRights27/09/22 01:43 PM
3

I dont fear women. I simply distrust feminists
/r/MensRights26/09/22 09:32 PM
0

I dont understand the 35% whiteknights
/r/MensRights26/09/22 03:07 PM
2

Its also beneficial for new workers to make old people retire. You dont really want to compete with people with decades of experience
/r/MensRights26/09/22 03:06 PM
1

One of the most important econonomic, welfare change would be lower retirement rates given lot of men die soon after retirement If productivity is going up, why does retirement age going up? Soon many things eill be produced by machines but retirement age will be 80?
/r/MensRights26/09/22 03:05 PM
6

While I agree with their protests due to how oppressive and anti male anti freedom theocracies are in general, I wonder if every iranian men would get a package of how western women are, how many would continue to protest
/r/MensRights26/09/22 03:01 PM
1

All of these together are already nit a majority. Male cuts the whole griup by 50% already. All of these attributes are held by about 20% of the US
/r/MensRights23/09/22 12:16 PM
6

Plagiarism means using someone's intellectual work as yours like in a thesis. Without citing sources and trying to sell the ideas as yours. It would be "people of the opressive group (people with knowledge) opress people without knowledge by requesting sources to be cited and/or requesting payment for their intellectual work.
/r/MensRights23/09/22 12:05 PM
1

The swedish bikini team are probably not on the average leftist protest screeching. Also many of the show biz people are basically forced to take this progressive stand. There are very good looking leftist women sure. My experience, is that the rightwing women, especially on peotests are better loojing on average than leftist women. The swedish bikini team is probably at most 20 women, small number compared to all the leftists.
/r/AntiFeminists23/09/22 11:14 AM
1

compare a leftist protest with a rightwing protest. There is a visible difference.
/r/AntiFeminists22/09/22 10:48 PM
1

Would be true, at most, for first wave feminism
/r/MensRights21/09/22 11:47 AM
1

To be super short and simple, despite people championing equality, men face many social discriminations, and also some direct or indirect legal ones.
/r/MensRights19/09/22 12:39 PM
1

from your comments it seems like you want a type of gift you can legally get back. Technically its possible to do that, depending your jurisdiction however in an investment sense, especially if she leaves and takes it the time and money that you will spend on getting it back makes it risky investment. imo you would do better with a normal investment and a cheap gift, but its your money
/r/MensRights18/09/22 11:14 PM
3

Why do you buy expensive jewellery? Its totally unnecessary.
/r/MensRights18/09/22 09:01 PM
3

His money his choice
/r/MensRights18/09/22 08:58 PM
7

The women's shoes industry is much bigger than the men shoes industry despite the type of shoe a woman has is kinda irrelevant for men
/r/MensRights18/09/22 08:54 PM
1

Well can you recommend a buddhist developed country?
/r/MensRights18/09/22 08:37 PM
3

I wish more women wiuld think like that. Your future bf or husband will be happy to have a partner with this positive attitude. Good luck to you in life.
/r/MensRights18/09/22 12:23 AM
1

When a doctor writes a medicine for the patient only the patient is kept in mind. Yes, if a man wants a medicine, like a contraception the only thing matters is his body. Hormons from women's contraception gets into the water, and it doesnt get banned despite that fact
/r/MensRights17/09/22 04:29 PM
6

In medicine its very important to look for what happens if you dont take the medicine Women would get pregnant. Thats a majorbchance thats why side effects matter less in that case. Would you accept slight kidney damage as a side effect from a cold medicine? Would you accept it as a side effect of a cancer cure?
/r/MensRights17/09/22 04:26 PM
4

If truweat this point you can name her Wonder or something like that.
/r/MensRights17/09/22 04:24 PM
7

I think the best you can do is being nice and supportive to men in your life. Like complimenting them, helping them, asking them if they are ok if they seem sad etc.
/r/MensRights17/09/22 04:21 PM
1

Bith socially and legally. Legal: earlier retirement, legal discrimination( quotas) Social: plenty example
/r/MensRights17/09/22 04:15 PM
0

Is there a developed country where "dominant people" who pay the most tax money, are not discrimjnated against? In short, where should I live if I happen to be "unlucky" enough to be born into these dominant groups?
/r/MensRights17/09/22 03:32 PM
1

Maybe you should make the argument that abortions should be illegal without the consent of the guy who got her pregnant. Something like that wouldnt ever pass. It would also hurt men as some women would threaten the man to sign the papers, and it would put a very big socialbburden on men, basically white feather campaign on steroids. #hevetoedmyabortion A similar problem exists with paternity tests. Women 100% know they are the mother, but they are outraged if men ask for one. Therefore making i…
/r/MensRights17/09/22 10:19 AM
1

Do you actually listen to what I say? Without legal abortion men has the exact same chance of getting out of fatherhood: 0%, unless the woman doesnt want to be a mother. This can happwn with abortion or adoption. Obviously nobody sane would impregnate wkmen just because, but when your gf is pregnant you already have a child and parental rights. And honestly, what society thinks about being a monster doesnt interest me. Granted, the mens right angle isnt the strongest point in the argument but it…
/r/MensRights17/09/22 12:17 AM
1

so uhhh you think if someone really wanted a kid he will just go "yeah my kid was killed no biggie I get another one" it doesnt go that way and again you can do that with abortion banned, so again, can you mention 1 case where its better for men to have abortion legal, and cannot be done with abortion being banned?
/r/MensRights16/09/22 11:51 PM
1

adoptions still exist, so obviously its still an option to do Strongly urget to abort means nothing, every single media says "ignore what men wants" so the ability to get an aborition is no more a guarantee than the ability to put the baby up for adoption unwanted fatherhood is still less bad than your wanted child being killed
/r/MensRights16/09/22 11:30 PM
1

Your eppendix is not a human being, its an organ. Men benefit little from legal abortion, as men who dont want to have kids have 0 guarantee a woman does what he wants. Mesnwhile if abortion is banned at least men who want kids can be ensured to be parents. It also enables men to seek child support from women. Adoption exists so they can still put the kid up for adoption together, eliminating parental resposnibilities
/r/MensRights16/09/22 08:49 PM
1

The part that the fetuses are humans are not a belief. Its a scientific fact. Given its the men rights forum I support policies thst benefit men. An abortion ban benefits men too, because at least now men who want to be fathers are protected. Legal abortion doesnt benefit men.
/r/MensRights16/09/22 11:04 AM
2

Makes sense to be honest. But I though US is so hard on discrimination even sotuations like these which is rather understandable, would not be exempt
/r/MensRights14/09/22 11:33 AM
2

In what way? Is there an exception for the law for room sharing?
/r/MensRights14/09/22 10:22 AM
1

On the other hand I have no real issue with these sugar baby relationships, even tho I think they are immoral. But they are legal, and they will happen because demand will meet supply. However when someone, be it a malebor female, wants to find a property to rent its time wasting to go through all these "bangmaid needed" ads. This is simply not the place. Its also icky to suggest this to women who just want to rent. Not to mention, technically its illegal discrimination to restrict someone based…
/r/MensRights14/09/22 10:19 AM
1

I dont use their services. But I hardly agree that its hard to sustain a middle class lifestye for a time at least given that the average cost of sex, from what I seen in arguments, js about 2 or 3 days work of money. For 1 hour of sex. If you have that much revenue for 1 hour work, and you generally dont pay taxes (lets be honest the prostitutes are not the taxpaying kind) its hard to imagine not being able to sustain a middle class life. We find you disgusting and then learn to find you less d…
/r/MensRights14/09/22 10:01 AM
1

sugar baby doesnt compete with prostitution as a "job" because the former is generally lower earning for the average woman and unavailable to most because they arent good looking enough prostitution however can make the above average looking woman to have a middle class life you also forget that some women earn a living from onlyfans or camming. no std's or unwanted touch there
/r/MensRights12/09/22 05:51 PM
3

Well, some men could do the same to women from Ukraine.
/r/MensRights11/09/22 03:08 PM
2

And a small group of criminal men commit a disproportionate amount of crime, if there are 10 violent crimes its rarely 10 men committjng 1 crime per capita more like 2 men committing 5.
/r/MensRights11/09/22 03:05 PM
1

A small group of violent criminals commit a disproportionate amount of violent crimes, the average man is not more violently crominal that the average woman.
/r/MensRights11/09/22 03:03 PM
8

They are already allowed to engage in justified violence. They often get a free pass on unjustified violence. If a self defense instructor would say something similar I'd probably agree. From a feminist author? Nah. She probably thinks violence is justified against a bad pick up attempt.
/r/MensRights11/09/22 02:57 PM
1

Your group might be the third group. But I think if you are not enslaved you could work other jobs. There are indeed women who choose it because they want an easy and well paid job.
/r/MensRights11/09/22 02:52 PM
1

I dont really like to exaggerate but in this case the difference is mind boggingly insane. One type is one of the worst possible human situation (sex slave) the other is almost a free meal ticked to middle/upper middle class if someone can cope with the job requirements.
/r/MensRights07/09/22 11:57 AM
1

Finnish/swedish etc feminists also think they live in a patriarchy so....
/r/MensRights06/09/22 02:30 PM
24

Very different. There is an insane difference between sex trafficking which is blatantly illegal and regulated prostitution that is legal in some/many? countries Some are women who are victims. Some are women in for an easy paycheck. Again a double standard exists where its bad due to men trafficking/exploiting women but its also "real work" and empowering I think its neither and should be legal simply because its not worth to criminalise consensual cases.
/r/MensRights06/09/22 02:27 PM
2

Someone who is old and has a terminal illness can refuse hospice. But letting doctors kill people violates their hippocratic oaths and its also very dangerous unfortunately due to corruption.
/r/MensRights06/09/22 02:24 PM
1

So?
/r/MensRights05/09/22 11:04 AM
1

but people entered marriage with a wish to have a family. Your suggestion is basically makes marriage nothing just a different name for cohab. Imagine spending thousands of dollars and enter into a legal contract with the wish to have kids then your husband gets a vasectomy. Or abort your kids At that point you could argue that you can get a vasectomy and not notify your wife. Then hide the fact that you are snipped and "try" for a baby for decades as a charade to have unprotected sex and deceiv…
/r/MensRights03/09/22 11:42 PM
1

But lot of trades pay better than a lot of degrees.
/r/MensRights03/09/22 07:51 PM
1

Kinda irrelevant to demonise a biological imperative. A bit shallow but more or less understandable for women.
/r/MensRights03/09/22 07:47 PM
4

More or less agree what he says but for me somehow its like "this guy isnt really authentic" A bit like a fat dietitian.
/r/MensRights03/09/22 07:46 PM
1

Tapk to a lawyer and follow his advice. Personally, as a non legal opinion I think you should go for the most advantageous like full custody. Why? Because its easier to downgrade from that to 50/50 custody then if you start from 50 custody at the first.
/r/MensRights03/09/22 02:35 PM
1

Yeah its ywt another double standard but cant you teach kids to give a high five instead? Also I dont like kids hugging teachers at all, sex irrelevant
/r/MensRights03/09/22 02:29 PM
2

Imo what is to be applaud of is not taking the easy way out and just like stop the experiment after a day and living as woman claiming men had it easy. For men its hard but I think there are mental adpects of being able to handle adversity of society better. Especially if you brought up as a man. Like, you dont have a worldview shattering moment like a westernvwoman would have. For women it would be like a woman from say, saudi arabia coming to the US. This woman would experience such a bad cukt…
/r/MensRights03/09/22 01:05 PM
5

I think assisted suicide is very dangerous to be legal. I dont know her mental status but I feel more shoudl have been done.
/r/MensRights03/09/22 12:59 PM
1

Also for you to read: https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2001-mar-29-me-43910-story.html This is a Norah Vincent article, about the woman who was recently featured here in the sub.
/r/MensRights03/09/22 12:56 PM
1

"You are not a real man" Nice feminist ad hom. I dont care what feminists think about me or the movement. This is a human rights movement notba popularity contest "All men are x or y because a man named chadwolf is the big bad" Laughable. I am not hurting the movement. You are hurting the movement with your pussyfooting but actually neither of us have a real impact on it as a movment is emasured by its actions not words. Especially anonimous online ones " s...s...top talking you are hurting my f…
/r/MensRights03/09/22 12:43 PM
1

These benefits are dwarfed compared to risks to men, and they could easily be given to cohabitating people (like tax cuts) Also most of the desired personal stuff like sharing of assets can easily be done with a contract.
/r/MensRights03/09/22 11:20 AM
1

And there is no right to kill innocents but pro choice woman demand this right. Yes fetuses have a right to live in the womb. Again the fetus is entitled to life, and since its only available through the mother's body, bodily autonomy takes second role, simple as. Yes we can force women not to kill children. By law. They can avoid pregnancy by using birth control. Or just proclaim his fatherhood rights when he has an unbirn child. Again, no real issue, ignore the whining of society, ban abortion…
/r/MensRights03/09/22 11:18 AM
1

Sorry but no. There are posts about it showing ukraine women run tinder apps while unraine men die. Ukraine is facing a nuclear superpower either they should draft everybody or nobody at all. I dont have an issue with using tinder at all, but the situation is basically Vietnam 2.0 where men die in war and women enjoy the culture. Again, the problem isnt tinder use, the problem is the insane difference and double standard in life options. But stop white knighting. Some ukraine women does go on ti…
/r/MensRights03/09/22 11:00 AM
2

Just because you think its harsh its true. What I mentioned is rather common. Yes, the "try to convince society" approach doesnt work for men. How long did roe stand? 50 years. Did any peogress happened? None, the state just burrowed even more into marriages. So it has to get worse before it can get better You can also argue that parenthood and abortion are different, and red states make this distinction. So you could argue that just because the kid can live you must parent. Btw as a man you are…
/r/MensRights03/09/22 03:05 AM
2

I also live in a draftless country, yet I am 100 sure a draft is instantly done the second a country is danger Ukraine style. Where 60 year old men cant leave while 25 year old fit women will whore around in another country on tinder while men die. And actually they are right for not dying for an abusive government. If she has no choice, then neither will you. Do you get how that works? Enlighten me. For men nothing changed.
/r/MensRights03/09/22 01:19 AM
2

No human is obligated to do this. human values freedom. This is where we disagree. You dont have the freedom to kill an unborn but the unbirn has freedom to live and the man to be a father. Canada will, alsmost surely, i itiate a draft if its attacked. Its easy to abolsih it when you are near an allied superpower. Canada is also a bad example as it was especially authoritarian in handling covid and anti gov protests. Mentionjng the Amish as a group who intentionally refuse modern medicine mostly…
/r/MensRights03/09/22 01:15 AM
1

In a society thats bigger than a very small village its almost impossible to have 0 crime. Some poeple are criminals due to mental illness, some want an easy way out instead of honest work. But I think systems like gun ownership and access to women, martial arts, citizen guard/patrol initiatives would help lower the rate. 0 rape? Very unlikely.
/r/MensRights02/09/22 11:24 AM
6

I think it should tick these boxes Pays well Doesnt destroy your body/mind Has a normal schedule like 40 hour max, no night shift no weeks away from home Won't be replaced by robots in the near future
/r/MensRights02/09/22 11:11 AM
3

Even the big voices of pro abortion access people agreed with this fact, because its easy to prove with 3 minutes of google search too bad the foot soldiers didnt get the memo.
/r/MensRights02/09/22 11:03 AM
2

Still the uterus has no benefit to the person herself. Its jused for purpose, which is to host a fetus. Yes it is part of endure. Women up. Men can easily die while drafted but its an accepted risk by society. Women must be forced the risk a similar sacrifice gor society as men do. And still death from pregnancy are much rarer than basically any risk. Women are not inferior to men. Thats your strawman. They are equal legally, and tmdifferent biologically. They should be also made to sacrifice fo…
/r/MensRights02/09/22 10:58 AM
2

Parenthood is already treated differently from pregnancy. You can adopt in red states but not get an abortion You can have to follow various regulstions in blue states but can easily give up a baby in a safe haven The time is up for asking nicely. We wanted a ban on draft long ago and it did not happen. We wanted change in parental rights long aho it did nit happen. The best way is to force these on women and then finally feminists help us while trying to carve out a change for women
/r/MensRights02/09/22 10:48 AM
2

What you personally think is rather irrelevant in a legal sense, because both of us can vote. And I can vote for pro life policies if I want. And they wont kick me out for being a man. Why would you be entitled to do anything to a random stranger vs your own child? Also the differences between organ donation and pregnancy are very different, they cant be compared. But I'd for one are ok with forced organ donation if the situations are similar to pregnancy like someone made the other person depen…
/r/MensRights02/09/22 10:46 AM
1

But I am gonna force my beliefs onto you. I have every right to, through laws.
/r/MensRights02/09/22 10:35 AM
2

So? The debaze is not over. I am still entitled to my parental rights
/r/MensRights02/09/22 03:11 AM
2

Its half our child. Half our genes.
/r/MensRights02/09/22 03:01 AM
1

Some stupid radfem idea that you need a legal contract before sex else its rape or you need to pay child support
/r/MensRights02/09/22 03:00 AM
1

Wrong, the goal is the same witht he draft. Try to include women into the draft/lack of repro rights and some change may happen
/r/MensRights02/09/22 02:58 AM
2

The uterus belongs to the fetus. Jts the only role of the organ to nurture a baby. Until artificial wombs exist women should just endure and not kill babies
/r/MensRights02/09/22 02:57 AM
5

Abortions kill children. Unborn children
/r/MensRights02/09/22 02:55 AM
2

If tue man wants the baby the woman should be made to carry to term
/r/MensRights02/09/22 02:52 AM
3

I think abortion should be regulated, but not to the extent you give people no options at all. People have the choice of birth control sterilisation and abstinence. Nobody needs abortions
/r/MensRights02/09/22 02:51 AM
3

Time for women to women up. Do your part in society, we need more children because the fertility rate is bad. Time to repay the dept of society of decades of voting rights without any draft responsibilities.
/r/MensRights02/09/22 02:49 AM
3

Nobody "forces" those women. They are just not allowed to kill the baby. Are you forced to shit by society because you need to digest food and excrete? No. Pregnancy is a biological procesy
/r/MensRights02/09/22 02:47 AM
1

Are you suggesting we force people to, even if they don't want to? Yes.
/r/MensRights02/09/22 02:45 AM
1

Ding dong your opinion: wrong
/r/MensRights02/09/22 01:30 AM
3

it does. few pregnancies end with lifelong mental anguish but many cases of your wanted kid being killed does. So it does hold more importance that the woman's whims > Do we say that ruining or risking the life of a girl or woman who is a living, breathing, walking, talking, conscious individual with relationships and history is worth it for a thing that is technically living but has no emotions or consciousness or sense of it's own existence because it is as "living" as an amoeba despite what i…
/r/MensRights02/09/22 12:37 AM
3

>If the father wants to raise the child the mother should seriously consider going to term lets shoot high and upgrade that to "has to carry to term"
/r/MensRights02/09/22 12:33 AM
2

Give sympathy where it’s due, whether or not the victim goes to the police doesn’t change how much of a monster the person is Its very relevant. Like someone who is in jail have a much harder time to hurt other victims. Its very important for victims to report criminals to protect other victims. Also the innocent until proven guilty principle is important Tbh many stuff the left sees as hate speech doesnt legally qualify as hate speech. Hate speech has a rather high standard to be punished for i…
/r/MensRights01/09/22 08:46 PM
3

we’ll still have old men counting down the days that Millie Bobbie Brown turns 18 I agree thats creepy. but its legal. same as having sex with a 18 year old women on almost all countries, and in 2 or even 4 years earlier in some places. 16 year for the age of consent is rather common in Europe for example. trying to change society is rather differnt than changing it legally. you cannot really do it in a society where diversity of views are important even if they are gross. yeah the grope!rape is…
/r/MensRights01/09/22 08:42 PM
5

that doesnt make it not true and they are entitled to your opinion. something that was totally appropriate to say for thousands of years and still done by parents (dont have sex so you wont get pregnant) doesnt become slut shaming just because femmies complain. sex causes pregnancy. so if you have sex you might became pregnant. the same be said to men a lot. by feminists.
/r/MensRights01/09/22 08:35 PM
2

sxo whats the solition to that? forcibly removing the victims from these relationships? you cant do anything to a man/woman who doesnt want help probably you are right but again if its hate speech which has quite a high standard then its a criminal issue. uintil that its free speech People still worship Andrew Tate and still talk about him. And? they do it with a lot of celebs and influencers
/r/MensRights01/09/22 08:32 PM
1

he asked a question about what other men or sub users in general think on men having avoice in abortion. some say no uterus no opinion, some say men only if pro choice, some say voice your opinion freely. ultimately votes matter the most and men can vote on abortion
/r/MensRights01/09/22 08:30 PM
1

thats a criminal matter non criminal men shouldnt be accontable for criminals actions doesnt apply to life in threat cases obviously. also if thats true then why in marriage you automatically make the men a father? even if he is the bio father? thats one sided. without it marriage kinda matter little tho. it makes it a in name only thing
/r/MensRights01/09/22 08:28 PM
2

still doesnt hold a candle to lost life or lifelong mental anguis there are pro life women who were pregnant, some were raped or had a hard pregnancy I dont have to lay an egg to have an opinion about a rotten one. or an omelette
/r/MensRights01/09/22 08:26 PM
2

If he did and its public the police can be notified by the gf or anyone else. Again, he is innocent until proven guilty no matter what. And its proven in court. I think hate speech is only when you specifically say harm a specific group or person directly, saying some crime shouldnt be a crime isnt hate speech no matter how stupid that is Also hes totally irrelevant I dont see why people stuck on it. there are tons of jerks online posting their jerk opinions
/r/MensRights01/09/22 08:25 PM
1

thats your personal opinion. I have different morals. I think the unborn are people , and that personhood is irrelevant as a concept being human is enough for human rights (and not person rights)
/r/MensRights01/09/22 08:21 PM
2

You cant replace your kid. You cant say someone just have another kid if they lost one. because human rights like right to life and right to fatherhood. > Women die during and after childbirth even with every medical tool available to us to this day the risk is incredibly little compared to several other risks women face for driving or just walking down a street > Pick the right woman. Cool can you recommend a good telepath? Someone who teaches me to read minds? some change their mind > If you’r…
/r/MensRights01/09/22 08:20 PM
2

yes we can. Source: red states, poland, malta etc
/r/MensRights01/09/22 08:13 PM
2

Andrew tate is not on educational platforms. He is on social media. And he is already banned from some but I dont think you ever meet his content unless you specifically search him up. What he does is free speech not hate speech. If it were hate speech he would be punished for advocating violence for a group. and he is innocent until proven guilty
/r/MensRights01/09/22 07:54 PM
6

lots of prochoice men here tho who wouldnt say that. They say "just abort if you dont want to be pregnant" instead tho
/r/MensRights01/09/22 07:52 PM
5

I’m of the opinion that we need to change feminism rather than abolish it, so that it suits everyone and holds everyone accountable, which unfortunately includes a hell of a lot of men. I am all aboard. But legal equality was archieved in the west. Why not focus on eastern women who literally lack basic human rights instead of complaining over manspreading in a safe western society? Also how do you counter the claim that women demand rights when society archieved a level where life is comfy? You…
/r/MensRights01/09/22 07:50 PM
2

"woman lied children died". Aka the woman can claim she wont then change her mind "you can have an other child, cope" do you tell the same to yoing woman who miscarried? No I dont advocate for having unprotected sex. At all. Its you beating your own strawman. But you are utterly wrong if you thing for man being a father is like "welp my child died? No biggie time to grab a beer *belch* "
/r/MensRights01/09/22 07:45 PM
3

see? also you are right that saying xy should be a human right doesn magically let all 8 billion people accesss broad band net. but its incredibly important to have access to it.
/r/MensRights01/09/22 07:42 PM
4

There are several opinions about it. The change when someone has access to it is incredible compared to the opposite Also the government shouldnt be able to block it
/r/MensRights01/09/22 07:38 PM
8

> I’m sorry you’ve felt injustices against you but that wasn’t feminism, we all get screwed over in life. Legal discrimination against white men are quite literally the work of feminism at least partly.
/r/MensRights01/09/22 07:20 PM
9

Several human right groups voiced the opinion on this and some hold the opinion that it is so important that it should be a human right. What is a human right is not necessarily decided. The government probably cannot bac someone from the internet just because which feminist would probably drool over if it would happen to Tate. https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/tech-news/un-report-internet-access-basic-human-right-flna122942
/r/MensRights01/09/22 07:19 PM
-1

Its all theoretical at this point given your hypotheticals but why would a man want to raise a kid with someone who tried to kill your kid? I hope it wont happen to me but if it does I just be a single father with pride or get a real mom for my child. btw do you write the same under post of women with abusive husbands? Tell them not to call the police? cuz the same can happen to the child: becoming a foster kid or having a single parent
/r/MensRights01/09/22 07:14 PM
4

Alright I accept that. Bottom line is all of us are entitled to their opinion. And vote according to out beliefs.
/r/MensRights01/09/22 07:12 PM
10

He is entitled to saying that. This is much more important than him, its a free speech issue. He is also entitled to a trial, a competent defense if he committed those crimes. But assuming he did yes absolutely, a heavy and ardous sentence. > Everyone will always have freedom of speech. Use it in your own life, just because you can’t say it on the internet doesn’t mean you’re being oppressed, the internet is a privilege after all. The internet is a human right. Just because the social media comp…
/r/MensRights01/09/22 07:12 PM
0

if that blocks a woman from killing their innocent unborn baby yes.
/r/MensRights01/09/22 07:03 PM
2

you should do it too. its a legit argument
/r/MensRights01/09/22 07:02 PM
-4

better to force someone for 9 months to endure a common medical state than rob someone from 80 years of life No, actually right to mental wellbeing, right to fatherhood and the right to life is much more important than not experiencing 9 months of ubitoquous medical state. By several thousand times
/r/MensRights01/09/22 07:02 PM
15

You can have legal equality and you already have it with some legal advantages baked in like early retirement but you want to force social equality. Thats not possible and quite frankly unfair to police in a society with many views and morals Andrew Tate are entitled to his beliefs and his free speech > All feminists really want, is for this to stop. They want much more than that. Even if they want to restrict someone's free speech only thats a very dangerous belief to have, free speech is a cor…
/r/MensRights01/09/22 06:59 PM
1

assuming its a country its criminally banned you can call the police you know
/r/MensRights01/09/22 06:48 PM
1

so? just because some women can skirt the law doesnt mean it cant happen, It legally can. Women can be stopped both legally and effectively from an abortion. Your assumption that all women are able to get a legal abortion, or will get an illegal one is simply not true. There are stories already where the woman had to keep the baby
/r/MensRights01/09/22 06:47 PM
-3

I do. You can now literally stop an abortion in several states legally
/r/MensRights01/09/22 06:45 PM
1

> However, if you get married, then automatic fatherhood that can be challenged by DNA test, and abortion possible with mandatory information to the husband. Thats very one sided. In a marriage in your system abortion shouldnt be allowed without the father's consent
/r/MensRights01/09/22 06:44 PM
1

> We can't make a woman carry to term. We easily can
/r/MensRights01/09/22 06:43 PM
4

what are you talking about? It literally happened. Several states banned abortion already
/r/MensRights01/09/22 06:42 PM
2

A woman shouldnt be allowed to kill someone's wanted child
/r/MensRights01/09/22 06:41 PM
-11

> And yet we don't tell women this I do lol
/r/MensRights01/09/22 06:38 PM
3

Honestly you are a citizen of your country, You can have any opinion and vote according to it. I am pro life and utterly dont care what others think, I am voting for pro life policies, simple as. You are entitled to your opinion even if I might disagree. End of story.
/r/MensRights01/09/22 06:37 PM
27

this is like "thats wasnt real communism" aka the no true scotsman fallacy
/r/MensRights01/09/22 06:34 PM
1

It doesnt?
/r/seduction01/09/22 02:39 AM
2

Yeah the voting right take away idea is bs. I never mentioned it
/r/MensRights01/09/22 02:14 AM
1

i am aware of that but my option saves the most lives and protect most freedoms.
/r/MensRights01/09/22 01:20 AM
2

so what happens if russia gets ukraine? the people matter not land. the ukrainian people will be able to live elsewhere
/r/MensRights31/08/22 09:05 PM
2

I want everybody to be evacuated. Men included. The state doesnt entitled to the life of its citizens. Incel as an ad hominem is cringe. I dont hate women but its time for them to grab a rifle if its expected from men. Where was you when a single father was turned back from the border and his kid was taken into state custody? Again. Evacuate everybody. The state isnt entitled to the life of its citizens. I am quite surprised nobody shot the border guards yet
/r/MensRights31/08/22 01:46 PM
1

I am not bitter at all, you are entitled to your religion and if you are happy in it more power to you. But you focus on the moral aspect of the marriage and whats relevant is the legal aspect. A few decades ago it was not an issue because despite having less civil rights, the government was much less involved in your marriage. Thus if someone comes here he has to be aware of the negative legal aspects of the marriage. This isnt a moral statement on marriage. Its more like a warning about the po…
/r/MensRights31/08/22 11:20 AM
2

But this is the men's right movement nit the men's religion movement. Right niw from an MRA angle its absolutely not recommended to marry. This isnt a moral statement its a legal issue. I also think marriage is good but juat not worth it right now.
/r/MensRights31/08/22 09:56 AM
2

There were female snipers back in ww2 You dont newd to be that strong to carry an AK some ammo and some mra's. Women are capable to do that No it doesnt make sense to evacuate women. Men were turned back and their kid taken from them even when they were the sole parent. So yeah evacuate the kids and make women and men fight. Or abolish the draft. Also young 20 year old women were allowed to leave. No children. Its a sexist policy no matter what
/r/MensRights31/08/22 09:42 AM
2

Yeah I often encounter the "only med for soldiers" tradcon mangina
/r/MensRights31/08/22 09:38 AM
3

rather irrelevant in a society where you can freely divorce and your religions tenets get utterly disregarded also your partner might disagree with your definition. right now anybody can divorce for any or no reason
/r/MensRights31/08/22 01:41 AM
4

you can love someone without involving the state. it has no business in being in your relationship
/r/MensRights31/08/22 01:33 AM
5

best marriage advice: dont
/r/MensRights31/08/22 01:32 AM
5

strenght is not really relevant in many roles. like spotter. or sniper. or you know non combat roles. or just being drafted to do civilian work in an armory factory also given how inequal the power level between the 2 combatants it would be logical to initiate a full draft I am almost entirely sure few women will return to ukraine even if ukraine wins the war somehow or white peace happens literally the only logical explanation to not draft women is not losing the western sympathy
/r/MensRights31/08/22 01:29 AM
8

ppl in ukraine are generally not at good health at age 60 Also war is the average game the average 25yr old chick is probably healthier than the average 60 yr old male
/r/MensRights30/08/22 04:03 PM
1

Yes video games are addictive. But I feel you are talking from the ex addict perspective. Like recovered alcohol addicts they cannot safely drink a glass of wine because they risk the chance of becoming addicted again. So they recommend not drinking at all. I personally drink rather rarely but I can moderate myself. Its much harder with gaming tho because it doesnt have the traditional physical addictive properties, its a mental addiction. But I dont believe in going teetotaler.
/r/MensRights30/08/22 11:26 AM
3

Dunno how its your country as I am not a lawyer, especially dont know your country/state laws but isnt there a provision about "ability to earn" Like couldnt the lawyer argue that she could earn amount x just choses not to? I'd argue a business that doesnt earn a liveablebwage is a fake business she should just work retail if she is unable to suppport herself Generally money spent on lawyers in cases your wallet is in danger is worth it.
/r/MensRights30/08/22 11:19 AM
22

Ukraine is facing an extinction level threat. Its utterly insane they would rather draft a 60 yr old man before a 25 year old fit woman. Why do they insist on keeping women? There might not be a Ukraine as a country in a few years at least if Russia follows up whst it says
/r/MensRights30/08/22 10:45 AM
1

We can argue about this and I'd generally agree with su h libertarian stance, knowing people vote for bigger government again and again and government favouring women jt wont happen soon. Also what do you think is gonna happen if the mother goes "Imma strong women I need no manpig" then struggle? The gov wont let the baby starve
/r/MensRights30/08/22 10:34 AM
2

cool have fun proving the business discriminated based on sex and not just picking the best candidates
/r/MensRights29/08/22 10:00 PM
2

Yes companies should be allowed to hire whatever they want to. They do discriminate they just hide it. I dont know the law but I dont zhink anything bars you to hire just men and claim they were better candidates
/r/MensRights29/08/22 03:11 PM
1

Most of it is empty threat. Unless its past a point you dont care beating some young boy is surefire way to get years in prison. The judge wont care about your overreacted paternal instincts. Now there are situations where some men wont care like if the guy beats the girl but mostly ots just a way of saying "treat my daughter well"
/r/MensRights29/08/22 03:06 PM
4

From women ☕️ to women 🤡
/r/MensRights29/08/22 02:56 PM
3

Well they can do rhe 2nd best thing and pay a sperm bank for sperm and be the single mom they always wanted. A W for men
/r/MensRights29/08/22 02:55 PM
3

Well good luck with the career then. If your goal is career and not family be the best career woman you want. What you and other woman cant do is be a career woman then when the biological clock starts to signal "its only a few years remained" you suddenly switch teams and join the family women. Because men who want family will pick the 20 year old family oriented woman. And not the 38 year old manager or ceo. I dont care how many degrees a woman has. When I want a family the type of degree is p…
/r/MensRights29/08/22 02:09 PM
5

If you force women into the draft it will take about 5 or 10 years before femmies force change and end it altogether.
/r/MensRights29/08/22 10:57 AM
2

I have a problem eith generally good dad's not hitting news except men who fulfill the father role for kids of single women. If someone is happy with that good luck but it is in a way glorifying not having your own kids and raising someone else's.
/r/MensRights29/08/22 10:46 AM
1

Human psyche changes slower than society. About 30 years ago or maybe even 20, chivalry, and traditional families and women being chivalric was much more common. It not worth it any more for men given how almost all women changed, but its rather recent. So I'd say yes some years are needed. Imo simping was generally a thing back then, its just you got a mediocre wife for it, not today. You get basically nothing in return
/r/MensRights28/08/22 11:44 AM
11

Why are more women in college? Where is the male 50% quota? If much less men go to college will men get affirmative action?
/r/MensRights25/08/22 11:21 AM
5

100 paid by men, net taxes. Women as a group pay taxes too but they get much more handouts so its basically 100% men
/r/MensRights25/08/22 11:20 AM
1

Your inner white knight/white dame is speeking. There are a lot of things to criticiss specific women, women in general, same with men. We people are not perfect. So pointing out mistakes, which is part personal decisions, part societal factors, isnt hate. Do better
/r/MensRights23/08/22 12:12 AM
2

"Why would you care about someone else's sex life?"
/r/MensRights23/08/22 12:05 AM
1

Nobody has the right to demand a seat, even people who need it like old ppl. The average healthy woman doesnt even have the right to ask nicely. Not only she has no more right than the average healthy man, an argument could be made that women could repay all those decades they made man stand up
/r/MensRights22/08/22 11:52 PM
1

And what issue they want male support? Abortion. About the only one social issue where only women can benefit
/r/MensRights22/08/22 11:49 PM
1

Dont really know about him. But I certainly do not care what feminists think and its not my job to discredit/cancel him.
/r/MensRights19/08/22 08:03 PM
5

It isnt easy, but it isnt really too complicated. Basically: Does any parent allowed to attain this freedom or not by abortion? (Pro choice pro life debate) Which parent allowed to legally forfeit parenthood? If the goal is equality its either both or none to these questions. Technically, banning physical abortion but allowing paper abortion for both genders is also technically a solution to the parenthood issue.
/r/MensRights18/08/22 03:05 PM
1

Are there any christian country left at all?
/r/MensRights18/08/22 02:54 PM
1

The pill tax (like the pink tax)
/r/MensRights18/08/22 02:53 PM
3

I am dopping a tear for hollywood stars not paid dozens of millions only less millions. So sad. This is an extinction level threat to humanity
/r/MensRights18/08/22 02:52 PM
1

"I cant get laid because I have no sauna"
/r/MensRights18/08/22 02:47 PM
1

Are feminists really that stupid to try to "win" the Depp case? Even the most anti police liberal drops the outrage after the photo of the "unarmed" criminal's gun is shown, and even the most back the blue conservative condemns the uvalde idiot police. Does feminists really have 0 shame? Same with roe, no matter how pro choice you are its undeniable that the constitution doesnt mandate abortion in every state. Clearly gun rights and freedom of speech, or even not quartering soldiers were importa…
/r/MensRights18/08/22 02:43 PM
10

Why do men have to advocate reactively about male victims in the first place? Why does mentioning that there are male victims too affect female victims negatively? Like if someone talks about female victims and sy else brings up male victims why would it matter? One doesnt invalidate the other in any way. In fact it even strenghtens it.
/r/MensRights18/08/22 02:36 PM
1

Say that you support real abortion for men aka dragging women to the abortion center and forcing an abortion. Thats not banned in discussion /s
/r/MensRights18/08/22 12:25 PM
1

In your opinion whats the beat option? There are rather lots of pro male ngos but their effect are rather limited. Feminism is strongly supported by both US parties, or almost all of eu parties. None support men rights movement. Us example: dems are 100% on board with radfeminism, reps only about 98%.
/r/MensRights18/08/22 12:21 PM
8

It has to be worse before it gets better. Until only women have repro rights feminists/society wont care. If none has, maybe at this point in history they wont be able to effectively push only their gender, and any repro law will have to apply to men too. Abortions isnt a good solution as it will only apply to women again. Other laws would be better
/r/MensRights18/08/22 12:16 PM
11

Should have kept it in her pants. Standard feminist response for men. Applies to women too
/r/MensRights18/08/22 12:13 PM
70

*Even if the boy is 14, was raped by an adult woman, who got pregnant then sued for child support
/r/MensRights18/08/22 12:11 PM
9

Unfortunately given that she had 2 kids show she is ok with having kids. People change, values change. Unfettered, elective abortion access without any male imput is an abrigation of fathers right. No, muh body isnt the argument winning argument
/r/MensRights15/08/22 10:05 AM
1

Not all cases will turn into adoption. Sometimes the parent will want to keep the kid
/r/MensRights15/08/22 10:01 AM
-1

adoption would still be an option it wouldnt be necessary for the mother to be the custodial parent it could be the man or the 50/50 my main problem is that men will pay. either directly with CS or with taxes. if so, I'd rather pay for my own child only
/r/MensRights14/08/22 11:57 PM
1

there is 1 issue. THe child. What is used unfairly by the court to abuse all other rights "think of the children" is a real concern. Like they do need support. Now, if it would be a taxpayer expense this would be still be paid by mostly men. Given that they are the net taxpayers. And honestly I dont want to pay extra taxes for someone else's children. So I dunno the ideal solution. I'd also want to let single fathers get CS from women. The system needs a major overhaul tho.
/r/MensRights14/08/22 11:19 PM
8

A country doesnt have a right to require the lives of men, no matter what laws say. A country is merely a piece if land, what matters is that the people. If there is not enough man who voluntarily, without any coercion, legal or social or moral , to take up arms then this country doesnt worth to be saved. Right now I'd say exactly 0 government exists today who is worth dying for. Non western ones have too shitty quality of life while western countries are feminist and exploits and abuses men. No…
/r/MensRights14/08/22 10:41 AM
2

Def a white woman. And the woman part matters much more than the black part.
/r/MensRights14/08/22 10:33 AM
2

Whats those "healthy relationship standards"? Wealth and height based standards are not healthy.
/r/MensRights13/08/22 10:38 AM
1

Yes, but it isnt the (imo) engineered outrage stuff with celebs and shit matters the most its the average men's actions. While I dont think men never should have acted chivalric throughout history( I see it as a sign of submission) feminists made a very unfriendly society. Where even basic helping others is probably not worth it. And I think its not really ideal society. But lay in the bed you make femmies, so to speak
/r/MensRights10/08/22 12:30 AM
2

That's terrible, but that could theoretically happen to anyone interacting with a woman who happens to be a terrible person. Who is the terrible person? The woman or the man? Meanwhile, people like Ted Bundy would ask women for help with the specific intent of luring them to their deaths. That's terrible, but that could theoretically happen to anyone interacting with a man who happens to be a terrible person.
/r/MensRights09/08/22 04:52 PM
1

So there is no feminism peacuse trump won. Ok. Not like Hillary was very unpopular. 53% white women voted to trump and the vast majority of black women voted blue as always. Many people stayed at home. This tells little about whether the average women is feminist or not.
/r/MensRights09/08/22 03:18 PM
1

That was a joke. Giraffes arent real, birds are government drones (hunger games reference basically) etc
/r/MensRights09/08/22 03:04 PM
1

If so then a law can easily make it that irrelevant stuff like sex or race is not needed. Basically blind picking the various cv-s without any irrelevant stuff. Then we see.
/r/MensRights09/08/22 03:00 PM
2

This is the age old blue pill red pill debate. Answer, it depends. There are saying like: ignorance is bliss Or the the "meek shall inherit the earth" Personally I should face the truth lest be caught unaware in a bad situation Just as another commenter said this diesnt mean you should only read bad news. You should read more positive news or books or stuff. Also if you feel bad shut off social media for a while.
/r/MensRights09/08/22 02:56 PM
1

Whoopskie. https://www.dailywire.com/news/woman-said-man-who-stopped-help-her-when-car-broke-amanda-prestigiacomo
/r/MensRights09/08/22 02:53 PM
3

I agree with it. I dont think random strangers are owed help, outside of emergency cases. Regardless if you are old or pregnant or with young kids you cannot expect to someone to junp in and help. Plan better. This also applies to men. I personally sometimes ask elder men/women/women with strollers but that it. I wouldnt help the average woman or men especially in a dangerous situation. I am not a bodyguard I am not Batman etc.
/r/MensRights09/08/22 02:50 PM
2

Trump derangement syndome terminal case? What does this have to do with Trump? Honestly this is comical at this point I thought TDS is a meme yet its real
/r/MensRights09/08/22 02:41 PM
22

The term sexual marketplace was known long before JP. JP doesnt make incels of men, he is just a psychologist mixed life coach mixed political commentator.
/r/MensRights09/08/22 10:23 AM
29

The majority of woemn are feminists. They just arent active sjw level supporters, they are the silent base. They make this clear at many elections, referendums throughout the year, worldwide.
/r/MensRights09/08/22 10:19 AM
2

Ministry of Equality exists. Its a sexist institution. Its literally like the book 1984.
/r/MensRights08/08/22 09:32 AM
3

True, but women sports generally have a similar issue. Even in more feminise sports like volleyball. Because, when men want to see sport they want to see quality sports. When they want to see good lookign women they go dating or watch porn
/r/MensRights05/08/22 02:17 PM
6

And for some reason in Singapore drug dealing is almost non existent
/r/MensRights05/08/22 01:26 PM
1

Almost the whole metoo movement was about rich and famous men
/r/MensRights05/08/22 01:25 PM
2

What? You mean equal amount of work/revenue for equal amount of work? You capitalist pig!
/r/MensRights05/08/22 11:53 AM
11

I agree but its irrelevant. Russia is a sovereign country and can have entirely reasonable or totally idiotic rules about drug use. If she doesnt like Russian drug laws dont go there. The "oh I didnt know the law" is also irrelevant, its not a legal defense. A professional athlete can afford staff who basically examine every single item if its ok to carry.
/r/MensRights05/08/22 11:52 AM
8

Can you specify please?
/r/MensRights05/08/22 11:48 AM
19

She got jailed for drugs but arguably she got a stiff sentence due to US russian relations, or the wish to change her to a Russian high profile prisoner
/r/MensRights05/08/22 11:47 AM
19

2022, where common sense is a rare/epic/legendary item
/r/MensRights05/08/22 11:46 AM
-9

Yes, men traditionally dont like to watch young adult athletic women. Obviously.
/r/MensRights05/08/22 11:45 AM
6

US competitive cyclers blame the empathy gap of not earning, in average, the same as competitive US football players Like gee. The most money a sport brings in the more the pay. When will men porn actors will blame the gender pay gap? Afaik women earn more. Btw do women watch the NBA or the WNBA? They arent "sex traitors" are they?
/r/MensRights05/08/22 11:44 AM
2

I get it and I agree with it. My problem is that some feminists seem to be interested in redefining consent in a way that, in time, will leave nothing but notarised contract be acceptable consent. So while in a social sense being respectful, not getting advantage, and the ideal goal of relationships is that both parties are 100% fully happy and on board, 100% in their right mind, sober etc, this is the social aspect. Now, the criminal aspect is an entirely different thing. A state, or feminists …
/r/MensRights05/08/22 11:37 AM
1

I am all for not settling or sufferinhg in silence in marriage, also making non marriage material people not to marry, other than that several assumptions are incorrect. Like if a woman is single she also have to cook, do the laundry for herself. Now if she is married she has to do it for 2 people but the effort doesnt have to be doubled. Cooking for 2 is not double the work of cooking for 1. House inequality is nit abuse. Do not dilute what abuse means. Women making mire household chores are of…
/r/MensRights05/08/22 09:51 AM
3

I see. So stuff like body language doest exist. Everybody must say loudly, "I solemnly consent to sex." You also cannot legally have sex with mute women. I get that sy shouldnt assume consent, and I absolutely, strongly support apprehending criminals, but this definition is faulty. Probably millions of consensual and perfectly legal sex acts happened where no party said an audibly "Yes, hereby me xy consent to sex" The feminists have it wrong. There is some concept called innocence until proven …
/r/MensRights05/08/22 09:41 AM
2

Yes the implication is real bad. Do women have to go to mandatory "dont poison your husband" training just because some women poisoned their husbands?
/r/MensRights05/08/22 09:17 AM
5

This also makes it rather likely that they have enough potential partners without the need to rape.
/r/MensRights05/08/22 09:15 AM
5

Yes. And there is training needed for that. Since everybody knows that no consent sex is rape.what is enthusiastic consent tho. Why does the word consent needs any other added words? So if you ask someone for sex and she says yes in a neutral tone, its rape? It has to be "yes yes yes" like in some romcom?
/r/MensRights05/08/22 09:14 AM
2

No problem, if women think not seeing the kid for half the time is violence they can just not divorce. Btw is there a reason Spain is so feminist? One would think that spanish is kind of a macho culture yet it seeems its the feminist capital in Europe
/r/MensRights05/08/22 09:08 AM
2

Thats for you to decide, personally I think its more beneficial for the movement is to incorporatw women to speak up, just not overshadow men's voice. No pressure tho, just my opinion. Btw thank you.
/r/MensRights04/08/22 05:49 PM
1

Yes. But in such a case when active personal parenting is involved its rather easy, 50/50 custody, no or minimal child support. Which also should be paid in stuff like food stamps or directly to rent or something like that. But not cash
/r/MensRights04/08/22 09:34 AM
5

In a way you are right probably there are many watchdogs who basically see whats going on then post about it in their respective fem subs. But the average lurker is just someone who are interested but doesnt post. Some women may think its a male space and respect it despite that they are allowed to post and its also welcome.
/r/MensRights04/08/22 09:32 AM
1

Yes. I generally expect a movement who has a sworn enemy ("traitor" women) to come up with funny and original insults.
/r/MensRights04/08/22 09:29 AM
2

Being slapped on the ass isnt rape. Its sexual assault at most. And no, no matter what someone thinks, I dont think its healthy to run to daddy government with every single issue. There is no apologism. Yes its sexual assault with current laws. Still dont think some drunk idiot slaps your ass be it a woman 8r men should be turned into a major criminal case with thousands of public money and private money down the drain over 5 seconds of drunk idiocy. This is also a form of this neo puritanism. B…
/r/MensRights03/08/22 11:19 PM
1

I think the fastest change you can do is go more rural in your country
/r/MensRights03/08/22 08:17 PM
1

While the economy and politics and various other areas are rather subpar compared to western countries Central and Eastern European countries generally benefit from the mixed culture of more traditional east and more liberal west. There are also some imbalances some male some female sided, but generally both a short term and a longer term relationship is realistic in these countries.
/r/MensRights03/08/22 08:16 PM
3

I get the femmy meaning behind it but they seem to be bad at insults too. Yes, it was indeed intended as a broad compliment to such good hearted women
/r/MensRights03/08/22 08:12 PM
1

The draft needs to be done aways with no ifs and buts. Citizens regardless of sex doesnt owe the government their lives. If I would ever find a government worth risking my life for, which probably never gonna happen, I'd like to be surrounded with people who is there voluntarily not people who may shoot me in the back to escape or sell me out to the enemy.
/r/MensRights03/08/22 08:01 PM
3

Lurking on a forum generally means people who read but not post/comment, its not necessarily negative.
/r/MensRights03/08/22 07:58 PM
4

I dont really see that as an insult. Generally man would pick women who, you know, respect them as a person and a man and not think he is trash? Its liek you know, a man being called a chick magnet. A man would probably only have a problem with that if he is deeply religious (prob not even then). Like many men I'd pick you (you meaning pro men rights women over feminists)
/r/MensRights03/08/22 07:55 PM
2

Neo puritanism: aka someone in society is benefiting from alienating man and woman Also despite that grabbing someone's ass unwanted is very immoral, and ofc criminal, a few decades ago it was dealt with a slap in the face or a very stern warning. Today the same situation both the man running to report the assault vs woman running to report the sexual assault. Running to daddy aka government and police like toddlers run to the teacher. The state shouldnt be involved in most private business and …
/r/MensRights03/08/22 07:52 PM
9

Then she will still archieve a desired effect of ruining his life
/r/MensRights03/08/22 07:43 PM
15

A parent should not be impoverished by child support, it should be a reasonable percentage of salary. Probably a poor parent wont spend much on the kid anyway. And obv nobody should pqy that much to be destitute Then other, non cs related help can kick in like free school meals etc.
/r/MensRights03/08/22 07:36 PM
3

The main problem is several groups and even the damn government are insisting to be the part of a relationship between man and women. Not just, you know, date and talk it out with each other, no, feminists orgs must run media pieces about how men should act and pay or not pay or hold the door or not etc. Same with the government. And I am not talk8ng about common sense laws like no domestic abuse or stuff. More like social stuff.
/r/MensRights03/08/22 05:09 PM
32

I am conflicted. I saw some of my friends suffer from lack of paternal support. You couldnt force those "fathers" to be a father but at least their financial support would have helped. Also single man are also entitled to child support if the woman refuses to be a parent then pay up. So while personally I think the concept is just and pro responsibility, the system needs an incredibly big overhaul. 50/50 in all ordinary cases, limit the amount to a more reasonable one, no more debtor prisons, pa…
/r/MensRights03/08/22 05:05 PM
7

Some businesses, like bikini bars or male fashion shops successfully argued that their business moder requires discrimination Technically its possible for a business to discriminate based on looks or even gender in very specific cases where the whole business model hangs on it. Not a lawyer but like if you want a 50 yr old man actor you can probably discriminate against young males and women. A gay bar would be probably able to argue the same. Other than that no discrimination should be allowed …
/r/MensRights03/08/22 04:52 PM
14

I get the rules about anti discrimination, but qhy cant gay bars ban women? Cant they successfully agree that their business model hanging on only male visitors? Btw why would straight women go to a gas bar?
/r/MensRights03/08/22 12:07 PM
2

Why do many women like bad boys then? Why do many women stay in toxic relationships despite having enough money to leave? What some other guys say is quite irrelevant compared to society. Several mainstream movements like feminism say its ok to be a jerk to men. You do realise, a sub currently exist with the goal to maximise female benefit at the cost of the man in relationships. Imagine a sub with the goal to "maximise sex in a relationship with minimal amount of money spent on the woman" how l…
/r/MensRights03/08/22 09:30 AM
5

All men in every country should register as one and refuse all forced service, even civilian ones in qn event of war. No country is worth it, and especially not its leaders who will be exempt. This is doubly true fir anti male western countries
/r/MensRights02/08/22 07:18 PM
3

And about 2 or 3 man can make onlyfans a profitable side gig, meanshile hundreds if not thousands of women cant. Remember this is technically only about poor no education women. As the average women as the average man can work the qverage job
/r/MensRights02/08/22 11:04 AM
2

Like most things in life it takes effort. Its undeniable it takes much more effort today than 30 or 40 year ago. Due to globalism and dating apps you also have to compete with much more man than before. But its only you who can decide if its worth the effort.
/r/MensRights02/08/22 10:51 AM
2

Today women can work. No longer an issue. Stay at home moms are free to name their price in the prenup.
/r/MensRights01/08/22 09:40 PM
1

I mean mandatory for the judge. Its pretty clear what the opt outs are. Its in my comment
/r/MensRights01/08/22 09:39 PM
2

Gov steps out, you are free to make any or no rules b4 marriage, it must be upheld by a judge. For custody: mandatory 50/50. Someone who is unwilling or unable will pay a low to moderate amount of child support, able to be traded to custody at will There are some contract samples at gov offices, qnd thats where the gov involvement ends
/r/MensRights01/08/22 05:50 PM
7

Citizen of a western anti male country. Its not women bad, its just society enables shafting men in divorce. I am very sure if men could shaft women in divirce, many would. I am not naive.
/r/MensRights01/08/22 05:33 PM
2

Ironically I'd love a fangs and claws gf if her fangs and claws are not aimed towards me, only to bad people who stand between us and our (moral) goals. Too bad it almost never happens she is a princess when dating but turns into a dragon when separating (generally)
/r/MensRights01/08/22 05:31 PM
1

Isnt marriage between you the entity you believe in? If you want children you simply have to accept the negatives for the many positives. Including child support potentially if you live in such a country
/r/MensRights01/08/22 05:25 PM
1

I understand you might have different views than me regarding marriage and the state ), but I am against marriage by principle. One of the worst thing you can do in a private relationship, in 99% of the time is to involve the state. Its not your friend, its your overlord. Fair warning: extended cohabitation can also lead to common law marrige, tho the rules are almost different on any part of Earth. You dont need marriage. If the chick likes you she will be your long term gf forever. If she make…
/r/MensRights01/08/22 05:21 PM
1

People who use welfare. Generallx not men
/r/MensRights01/08/22 01:36 AM
19

The word women appears 0 time in my comment. Just like the world, my comment doesnt revolve around women. Since you missed my point tho, I simple it down: studies show that the vast majority of taxes are paid by men. Do women pay taxes? Sure. Do they have jobs? Yes. But given that they live longer, and get more support from society, some studies even show that men are 100% of net taxpayers. Even if these studies are false however, if a large group of men and women are disillusioned from society …
/r/MensRights31/07/22 12:09 PM
44

The major hit to society will be when the disillusioned men en masse will just scale back work and work a few hours a week to pay as little taxes as possible while still have enough money for rent and food.
/r/MensRights31/07/22 10:35 AM
4

If its just choosing to be a man or woman why do trans people work hard to look like the desired gender? Why the surgeries? Why not just proclaim you are a man or a woman and call it a day?
/r/MensRights31/07/22 10:28 AM
5

You do realise that until about 2010 or 2015 gender was used as a synonym to sex? Also several countries had no word for gender? There was sex and thats it. Sex was used in all scenarios, and it worked perfectly.
/r/MensRights31/07/22 10:23 AM
1

I personally think MRA is more or less centre right. Many of the concepts like rise at your own work, low taxes low welfare, less welfare state etc is rightwing ideas. Feminism is also strongly leftwing. Current leftwing parties, in general, strongly favor women or alternative sexualities or minorities over straight white men who is still the majority of men. Hating a group for wwhatever historical reason is also very problematic. Just as women being erased in some places (see women's swimming) …
/r/MensRights31/07/22 10:18 AM
2

What about the socialising part? Men are socialised for what? In your context
/r/MensRights29/07/22 06:19 AM
2

Well, it does seem geniune. Probably you wont be an ally by opening with a primarily woman issue, aka abortion access. Most men, in short, suffer from being ignored. By other women, other men, lawmakers, society. While letting women into education, workforce is important, decades passed since legal equality, and not the sex based affirmative action already flipped the favor towards women in the workforce and education. Women generally fare better in school. Sex based quatas generally scrapped th…
/r/MensRights28/07/22 09:22 PM
8

The average man is not a criminal, the statistic is skewed due to 2 major reasons: Many poor women have the marriage opt out of powerty, men dont The minority group of criminals commit the vast majority of crimes, like if 22 violent crime happened, its probably 2-3 serial criminal, not 22 first offender man Men are not socialised at all to commit crimes. This is borderline hate speech
/r/MensRights28/07/22 09:15 PM
1

Yes. I also agree. But prog mens rights (basically second wave feminism for men in a good sense) is unsupported by the big political parties.
/r/MensRights28/07/22 09:12 PM
2

Freedom to do what? The ban of slavery robbed millions of the freedom to own slaves. Not all type of "freedom" is good.
/r/MensRights28/07/22 05:16 PM
4

My body (not working extra for 18 years) my choice
/r/MensRights28/07/22 05:14 PM
6

Second this comment
/r/MensRights28/07/22 05:13 PM
5

So you are against all laws? Do you think forcing age of consent laws on pedophiles are bad or immoral?
/r/MensRights28/07/22 05:10 PM
4

This is not a privilege. This is simply biology, its like men living shorter lives due to biology. Work out, have a gun. Both of these are also fought against by sjws
/r/MensRights28/07/22 05:08 PM
2

Why would I care? I gained no parental rights, and the bodily autonomy aspect doesnt effect me.
/r/MensRights28/07/22 05:07 PM
1

Yes. Reason: fetal and fathers rights
/r/MensRights28/07/22 05:05 PM
1

I believe you. So can you tell me what did you do for men rights, especially male reproductive rights in the past, say, 10 years? For the more skeptical peers of mine.
/r/MensRights28/07/22 05:04 PM
4

Feminists effectively desensitised the other half of men who are pro choice. Congratulations, enjoy the pie you baked. Not you specificslly, you feminists.
/r/MensRights28/07/22 05:00 PM
6

We also heard no uterus no opinion for 50 years. Begging for our help know is at best begging at worst insulting
/r/MensRights28/07/22 04:56 PM
1

Freedom of speech is very important, not just as law(often cited by the muh private company) people,also as a principle. Given that the MRM is too small to effectively cancel it would even be counterproductive.
/r/MensRights28/07/22 04:53 PM
0

Yes it did. It did stop people who was on the fence about alcohol. It stopped who was jailed over it. Yes. The war on drugs also stop people on the fence. But not hardcore addicts. It also stops thousands who are in the jail due to it. Whats the drug use rate in Singapore where you get the death penalty for drug posession? So what. Women who want to kill other humans and die during their crime can get the Darwin award. I personally gonna start the abortion version of it if it happens a lot. Its …
/r/MensRights28/07/22 04:49 PM
3

I am pro life
/r/MensRights28/07/22 03:33 PM
1

If you want child support/pregnqncy cost paid for you either consent to the test or wait until the kid is birn. Simple as
/r/MensRights28/07/22 03:33 PM
1

Republicans are generally on the traditional men train while dems are on the white knight men train The rather progressiveness of men issues angle is a minority.
/r/MensRights28/07/22 03:31 PM
0

Bans generally reduce use rates given it, at most, deter people on the fence.
/r/MensRights28/07/22 03:28 PM
1

Several states literally banned abortuon what are you talkjng about?
/r/MensRights28/07/22 03:27 PM
1

I am pro life so I think this is strenghening fetal rights. 9ther than that maybe its time to shake up the current status quo qnd make paternity test a common and socially accepted procedure. The only thing that stands between its commonness is women's ego.
/r/MensRights28/07/22 03:25 PM
6

You are correct. Now, given that you evidently knwo this what did you personally do to advance men rights?
/r/MensRights28/07/22 03:23 PM
3

For a relationship sure but the 1 to 10 scale is about attractiveness. Not being relationship matierial My strictly personal experience is that the attractiveness-relationship matieral is a bell curve Ugly women are generally bad relationship material (1-4) because they are often low confidence, bitter, or hate men. The best gfs are the 4-8 women. Ideal is about the 6 where she is easy on the eyes mostly but also isnt a "I am a princess I dont have to work on a relationship". Bombshell women are…
/r/MensRights28/07/22 03:21 PM
6

Almost all men support women rights. I never heard anybody who are against women rights. But many of them who advocate for female privileges, aka white kighting are generally unmanly. Soiboi stereotype. So it applies to men less given women rights enjoy widespreqd support
/r/MensRights28/07/22 03:16 PM
4

Dont want to derail the conversation too much but have you guys noticed that women who advocate for men rights or right wing causes or at least holding a balanced opinion are generally attractive? Many of them are pretty or at least average. Meanwhile many on the opposite side are quite ugly. Maybe the ancient Romans were right. Healthy mind in a healthy body
/r/MensRights28/07/22 02:32 PM
3

wait there is women?
/r/AntiFeminists25/07/22 11:48 AM
1

yes I think a semi professional talk would do good for most people. Even me actually, there is always room for improvement. the anonymity also helps
/r/seduction19/07/22 01:07 PM
2

No its just body automy light (given that it doesnt save men from forced servitude or genital mutilation) Right to sterilisation is maybe a repro right but picking celibacy is unrelated its more like a lifestyle choice. Its very poor. Hosestly, the greatest change would be mandatory 50/50 custody no child support.
/r/MensRights18/07/22 02:03 AM
1

Yeah thats why I xited the Maslow pyramid theory which I more or less accept as correct Its possible to live with no sex but imo its not good. For most people. Obviously the incel problem is partly derived from lack of sex driven frustration.
/r/MensRights17/07/22 09:18 AM
1

Man hating is a problem but thats a bigger group. Most women are feinists because they benefit from feminism simple as. All those social benefits and money spent on women's issues( mostly paid by men's taxes). Its a bit like people on welfare voting for more welfare even if they on wlefare undeserved. Do they hate the middle class people? I wouldnt say so, they wonte for more welfare because they benefit and happy to take away their money, regardless of their opinion on the group
/r/MensRights17/07/22 12:39 AM
1

Gamers are one of the most inclusive groups. Like all other hobby groups skill or good ideas/discussion js the most important. Are there jerks? Yes, anonymity makes some people jerks. Are some groups excluded? No, in fact simping also exists online but obviously the "I am a girl 8 excpet special treatment" people are ridiculed
/r/MensRights17/07/22 12:35 AM
1

Why would a US state be on a country list? /s
/r/MensRights17/07/22 12:31 AM
1

You can get autobanned on bs. On two x I had a rather strange experience, as for every 2 men bad, I hate men posts there was "I love my bf" posts. Some users were quite levelheaded. I had to tiptoe a bit but I called out some users and they called out each other on the most egregious bs. Obviously finally I was banned over a meme comment "not all men"
/r/MensRights17/07/22 12:30 AM
6

Its a legit problem but it shouldnt be a joke or a term used to shame men. Sexual desires is very important, sex, at least according to the Maslow pyramid is a very basic need, similar to hunger. Most of them suffer in silence, which also isnt ideal but a small but loud minority xhannels their frustration into criminal acts. Which is dangerous. Also putting 100% of the blame on these men is unfair. They are personally responsoble too, probably mostly, but ints undeniable current society doesnt s…
/r/MensRights17/07/22 12:27 AM
1

Sooner or later it will have to change. The second the system becomes unstable and it will effect the elites monetary gains women will be thrown under the bus
/r/MensRights17/07/22 12:19 AM
1

Yes. I have to say I disagree with the current child support system but despise deadbeat fathers due to personally seeing how it effects people's personal lives. I also hate jerks regardless of sex. But I wont play the liberal white knight on every single woman joke
/r/MensRights17/07/22 12:05 AM
1

This is risky too since while its not the same as legal amrriage it will be a strong sign of cohabitation Better to just say no. I dont believe in marriage, period. The woman either accepts or goes. Or is she is so great then basically risk the marriage.
/r/MensRights17/07/22 12:00 AM
1

Courts decided several times that rhey cling to the "think of the children" approach no matter what, meaning the financial need of the born children is more important then anything else
/r/MensRights16/07/22 11:52 PM
1

The second this welfare affect all the handouts women get except a quick change
/r/MensRights16/07/22 11:38 PM
1

So the solution is to curb welfare
/r/MensRights16/07/22 07:06 PM
23

Reproductive rights means reproduction related, if you are celibate or sterilised you are not reproducing
/r/MensRights16/07/22 07:03 PM
2

Yes, its very hard to prove that you did not force someone to enter a code. Obviously, you shouldnt have to prove it, the state/accuser woman should prove that you forced her to press the button, but we know how rape cases work. Also these websites/apps are good in a way but also very diszopic and I do feel they offer a false sense of safety. These wesites try to solve the effect of a bad cause, the cause should be changed. Every single crime should work based on the presumption of innocence, an…
/r/MensRights14/07/22 04:53 PM
1

Why? If men start wars why its ok to force it on women? Why does Ukraine conscript young boys and grandpa aged men?
/r/MensRights14/07/22 04:49 PM
1

And after the war ends they realise many of the women do not want to go back to rebuild or they are already married/have 2 kids. So the remaining women will be put on the pedestal even more
/r/MensRights14/07/22 01:36 PM
1

So you are ok with changing it and including women? Ujraine do expect male children to fight since the draft rules say 16-60. So kids and grandpas included in the draft
/r/MensRights14/07/22 01:34 PM
1

Dave Chapelle skit just got real
/r/MensRights14/07/22 01:30 PM
2

Still can make up some stuff like forced me to enter the password and press consent. Or some bs
/r/MensRights14/07/22 01:29 PM
2

I dont feel opressed at all for women having equal legal rights. In fact I am happy with it. What I have problem with is the current attempt of forces social equality/sameness to men which ignores biology, psychology, sociology, and wants all the perceived benefits of being a man with none of the responsibilities. Many of these attempts also harms men, their wallet, their social standing etc
/r/MensRights14/07/22 01:25 PM
1

which is quite little if its advised to 18 yr old men. If its time sensitive your original claim is false given its continously dropping with years passing
/r/AntiFeminists12/07/22 04:28 PM
1

Many do, thats why the effort is on grooming children by the media and public schools
/r/AntiFeminists12/07/22 08:48 AM
1

This diminishes after a few years.
/r/AntiFeminists12/07/22 08:47 AM
11

Evolution at work. I say full spead ahead
/r/AntiFeminists12/07/22 08:44 AM
5

Literally everythjng she listed except murder is connected to sex. In fact when men murder women its also often sex related compared to men killing men in a gang war or during a crime.
/r/AntiFeminists11/07/22 10:38 AM
0

Sex is at the bottom of the Maslow pyramid, it is the same need as water or food (according to the Maslow theory). Claiming its not a big deal is claiming being food insecure is not a big deal
/r/AntiFeminists11/07/22 10:36 AM
16

Why would the state's face diaper rule be more important than their religious right to have a beard or their bodily autonomy, or right to self expression?
/r/MensRights06/07/22 02:39 PM
6

> Only feminists are mad And almost all lefty women and even some moderates > There are women who are anti feminists too. And unfortunately they are a tiny, dwarf minority. Despite all my respect to these women they are few. Just as radfems are a loud minority albeit smaller then the antifeminist women. Most women are supporters of the status quo and it is feminist right now.
/r/AntiFeminists05/07/22 11:53 PM
1

I dont get you. I said I dont support ERA because abortion. Then you post a text that shows it explicitly includes abortion yet you stuck on grammar.
/r/MensRights05/07/22 03:00 PM
1

"Women's equality includes the absolute right to make reproductive decisions including termination of pregnancy" Termination of pregnancy is abortion I am being trolled right?
/r/MensRights05/07/22 02:35 PM
1

When you have to cite a fictional example because you cannot cite a real world one. Also ofc "give me" not "I will make it". Common entitled phrase.
/r/MensRights05/07/22 11:27 AM
0

Thise buildings are built from paper and corn. These are not real brick/steel/concrete architecture.
/r/MensRights05/07/22 11:26 AM
1

Communism is like anarcho capitalism. It works in theory, but only in theory because it says man are selfless. The ideal js good but the execution is horrible Capitalism is built on human greed and thus it more or less works
/r/MensRights05/07/22 11:19 AM
1

1st and 2nd wave yes mostly 3rd+ wave no
/r/MensRights05/07/22 11:11 AM
2

1, No. Their wellbeung isn thanging on elect8ve abortion. Medical abortions are still legal, conveniece abortions are not in some states. 2, that was ignored equally before, after, and post Roe 3, which already happened regardless of abortion, the welfare queens rarely abort 4, corporations pass any cost. They dont have to provide these abortion packages. Eu companies are able to thrive despite all the min wage, work safety, generous vacation laws. Just the Ceo has 1 less yacht 5, yes and? Clog …
/r/MensRights05/07/22 11:03 AM
3

I love my mom and I think she is a great role model to me. I actually learned to take the best from various people to see them as role models from the best part of their personality. Its generalisation but I think both parents are important to pick up traits from. Imo men pick compassion and caring for others from their mom (generally) I for one picked up love of dogs. Compassion. Selflessness. Hard work Specific example: I was ok with animals and was neutral now I adore dogs. A bad mother howev…
/r/MensRights05/07/22 10:50 AM
2

Cope and seethe abortoid. Have babies, femcel You will be pregnant. You will have babies. You will buy a crib And you will be happy.
/r/MensRights05/07/22 10:39 AM
0

No because abortion is in it
/r/MensRights05/07/22 10:35 AM
2

The problem is that with double the workforce, the double the supply, meaning wages stagnated. Yeah bith sexes can work, now 2 people earn the same as 1 person before.
/r/MensRights05/07/22 10:35 AM
1

What do they do specifically?
/r/MensRights05/07/22 10:33 AM
10

Its barbaric and bodily mutilation. I am so against it that I'd ban it for all non medical reasons, age irrelevant.
/r/MensRights05/07/22 10:30 AM
–

We already have the tech to counteract this. Mandatory no opt out paternity test. Its a state issue because it saves thousands in court costs for a few dollars of test
/r/AntiFeminists04/07/22 11:14 AM
2

> bridge builders Yeah no thanks: https://thestatetimes.com/2018/03/30/female-headed-construction-and-the-collapse-of-fiu-bridge/
/r/MensRights02/07/22 08:01 PM
13

No, just repeal the discriminative law
/r/MensRights02/07/22 11:52 AM
1

Yes. Its way past time for women to be invilved in all of society. Remember, the reason for so few women in hard jobs because they get hired to do office jobs instead (often direct or indirect affirmative action). Time to pick up the shovel ladies.
/r/MensRights02/07/22 11:51 AM
1

And before the Texas law, for 49 years, it still wasnt a requirement and was actively fought.
/r/MensRights01/07/22 03:17 PM
15

An abortion ban doesnt mandate a medical procedure, as pregnancy is not that It doesnt even mandate pregmqncy
/r/MensRights28/06/22 01:49 AM
1

mother of your children wants to abort Huh?
/r/AntiFeminists28/06/22 12:41 AM
18

You know that there is a great difference between mandat8ng a medical procedure vs banning it? Proposing a bill to ban vasectomies would make more sense but these politicans are stupid to recognise that
/r/MensRights28/06/22 12:04 AM
-1

All these female cope. They tried to be wine auts cat ladies or community cum dumpsters and they werent happy. Maybe time to try to be more traditional now? Like safe sex ,long term relationships etc
/r/MensRights27/06/22 11:58 PM
1

I am an atheist. Many laws affect others, and personally my worldview and morals allow decisions that affect and even force specific stuff on others. Even the do not harm others part is pure moral stance, which has little weight in a society where you are allowed to choose your own morals
/r/MensRights27/06/22 02:01 PM
1

I know how horrible the principle is but its totally unfeasible to ever happen and people who push this basically shoot themselves into the foot for the average person voting sense
/r/MensRights26/06/22 10:34 PM
2

Basically yes they said the silent part out loud
/r/MensRights26/06/22 10:29 PM
-26

chill out vasectomies will never be mandatory
/r/MensRights26/06/22 02:49 PM
41

asked the same back then on 2x before I was banned and many did admit that it was "no uterus no opinion if you are pro life"
/r/MensRights26/06/22 01:35 PM
1

Stuff below applies to both of you. If you ever divorce (hope it wont happen) keep in mind you loved each other and treat each other eith respect. If you two can remain level headed it doesnt matter, if you two cannot, and be bitter and antagonistic even the best prenup will worth little. Try to exclude the state as much as possible after married. While married: have some alone time. Try nit to argue over little stuff. Always be respectful with each other especially if 8thers are present. Never …
/r/MensRights26/06/22 10:58 AM
1

men are the main taxpayer group. if you can freely forfeit parenthood what stops a random trailer trash to have 7 children on the taxpayer's dime?
/r/MensRights25/06/22 07:35 PM
84

there are a lot of jerks today but if you are a jerk to women as a man you quickly get shamed while women often get praised for being jerks to men
/r/MensRights25/06/22 03:50 PM
-1

tbh incel is entirely different than just someone who is romantically unsuccessful I pity them but I am also sad because they take one of the least good (and least manly) solution. Lot of men struggle with dating Much less blame women or whatever instead of themselves. Personally I think forgoing any self improvement is a very unmanly way. I think we need another term for ppl who are simply unsuccessful at dating but take a positive outlook and try to improve
/r/MensRights25/06/22 03:49 PM
9

social justice warrior
/r/AntiFeminists25/06/22 03:43 PM
2

I'd rather not pay for others kids. men pay most taxes so they will pay for other parents kids. I rather pay for only mine and that can be eliminated with shared custody Men's rights virtually all boil down to being about societal gender roles, with men getting shafted when they step outside the expected role of being a provider/protector. they get shafted because societies favor women but the "elites" even more. they get shafted even if they are the model male citizen
/r/MensRights25/06/22 03:21 PM
-2

Yes. If neither of you want to parent you can use adoption services tho.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 01:57 PM
49

I like these delusional comments. I dont even go defensive just say, come and get it. The chance that the average sjw feminist (or even the butchest one) successfully trap/catch the average man is close to 0. But if the sjws like to be beaten or shot in self defense (I am not a lawyer but I am almost entirely sure this would warrant lethal self defense) they can try.
/r/AntiFeminists25/06/22 11:47 AM
4

Adoption exists. Yes, some men will squirm too. Many of them get trapped tho. Again, I hold the same standard for men: knock up a chick, pay child support. Or just the squirming of women afraid to give birth being forced to do it Just be a real woman. Billions go and went through birth. Dont have fear in life, have faith and hope. Or, just cope.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 11:41 AM
10

Doctor wont give young women Not my problem. You feminists have all money and media, earn change or create a charity. This procedure is legal so hire a willing doctor and donate. Men can wear condoms...they dont They do. Other bc exists. ...men CAN ejaculate anywhere instead of deep within a woman without protection. A woman can deny sex to a condomless man. ..they cant control themselves tho...even more reason to get them fixed! They can control themselves just as women. And using "fixed" is ki…
/r/MensRights25/06/22 11:39 AM
9

Why not women have tubals? What if someone is already married to a pro life woman? Gay men? Already infertile men? Childfree men? Men doesnt cause unwanted pregnancies. Both partners are responsible for an unwanted pregnancy, women give the eggs after all. In case you dont know this about the male body: ejaculation isnt 100% controllable.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 10:27 AM
3

The country that made it did not ratify it that tells a lot about it really. I am not a full expert on the topic, the issue with it is that it basically have a feminist view and has the male rapist female victim stance in all cases, use gendered language for victims and agressors, doesnt provide for men, and has an immigration loophole that basically let every woman from an islamic/asian country immigrate is she cites she is abused as a woman (which for the record, can be absolutely true but thi…
/r/MensRights25/06/22 10:21 AM
0

No Even raped men have to pay child support. But dont forget to protest the roe decision, this society do holds bodily autonomy and parenthood chojces in high regard /s
/r/MensRights25/06/22 10:20 AM
2

Just claim you are a woman and ask for the 4k for an abortion. What they gonna do?
/r/MensRights25/06/22 10:18 AM
1

Soibois self sterilise? Thats great news!
/r/MensRights25/06/22 10:17 AM
39

Well well it aint the consequences of my actions
/r/MensRights25/06/22 10:16 AM
120

Many of them dont even support the basic decency of at least telling the father about the pregnancy and just ask his opinion. This doesnt mean decision, just telling men and letting them at least discuss it
/r/MensRights25/06/22 09:33 AM
11

I am pro life anyway, but I laugh so hard at the squirming
/r/MensRights25/06/22 09:31 AM
1

Several states have putative father's registry or paternal registry. Yes, that's what needs to change, however if the woman doesnt want to parent at all you will get the custody automatically.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 08:02 AM
1

Both
/r/MensRights25/06/22 07:59 AM
1

No I just block you.
/r/MensRights24/06/22 11:42 PM
1

You dont talk to me in that tone.
/r/MensRights24/06/22 11:04 PM
2

Yes I do, I already pay taxes Where I live we have many pro family policies I support. Solutions to the issues raised 1, Mandatory paternity test 2, lower child support and prioritise shared custody 3, easily solved by mandatory visitation 4, real due process
/r/MensRights24/06/22 11:02 PM
1

For older kids parental rights are often srill in effect so they csnt be adopted
/r/MensRights24/06/22 10:47 PM
1

1, those men have the same situation as before 2, false rape accusations en masse will just further delegitimise them 3, many do commit suicide over an unwanted abortion 4, this is a systemic change so it will change a lot 5, false as women who try to get out from motherhood will be able to but will pay CS 6, the only idiot here is you, and you are even a whiteknight. Right to life is more important bodily autonomy does shit for men against draft, a pro life culture will
/r/MensRights24/06/22 10:15 PM
1

Its a solution for unwanted parenthood Newbirn babies quickly get adopted, umits older childrrn who have it hard
/r/MensRights24/06/22 10:07 PM
1

I give no fucks about personhood its just a fancy way for the state to deny human rights
/r/MensRights24/06/22 10:06 PM
6

Better be a foster kid than dead You can get ectopic abortions dont lie
/r/MensRights24/06/22 09:55 PM
5

Adoption exists
/r/MensRights24/06/22 09:49 PM
1

I care the same about womens right as women care about mens right. 0. Women already have the same and even more rights as men so I focus on the disadvataged sex 100% of the time: men.
/r/MensRights24/06/22 09:48 PM
5

Yes it would. I wont whiteknjgt in fact I try to opoose feminist as hard as possible
/r/MensRights24/06/22 09:46 PM
4

Yes we can ignore them
/r/MensRights24/06/22 09:42 PM
1

Adoption I care more about men who suffer lifelong mental problems from an unwanted abortion then men who have to pay a bit of money
/r/MensRights24/06/22 09:40 PM
0

Ok what about lobotomies Taking prescription drugs without prescription Euthanasia Many medical procedures are banned
/r/MensRights24/06/22 09:40 PM
-4

Its a medical procedure according to some
/r/MensRights24/06/22 09:35 PM
1

They will have to, "think of the children" style, when the alternative is they paying for the kids lunch
/r/MensRights24/06/22 09:19 PM
0

And females too
/r/MensRights24/06/22 07:06 PM
7

If you are pro choice you fight for the right to let my girlfriend possibly kill my wanted child
/r/MensRights24/06/22 06:41 PM
1

That sucks Maybe I try the same over wkmen who mourn Roe then. Its just a legal decision stop whining
/r/MensRights24/06/22 06:34 PM
10

Fuck abortion Where was you on the draft debate, the circumcision debate, the vaccine mandate debate You gave 0 shit about bodily autonomy you want abortion thats it.
/r/MensRights24/06/22 06:33 PM
1

Would you say "its not even a child lol stop crying" to a woman who had an early miscarriage?
/r/MensRights24/06/22 06:23 PM
1

Do you say the same to women who mourn after a miscarriage?
/r/MensRights24/06/22 05:50 PM
-6

So does banning conversation therapy and lobotomies are human right abuse?
/r/MensRights24/06/22 05:48 PM
2

someone who passed 8th grade biology, since its pretty clearly written in biology books and studies, but dont let science block your ignorance
/r/MensRights24/06/22 05:17 PM
2

women who wanted an abortion will not want to act as a mother so either they give up the kid for a loving couple or the woman pays child support
/r/MensRights24/06/22 05:12 PM
2

zygote sperm Did you pass 8th grade biology?
/r/MensRights24/06/22 05:11 PM
1

well a great systemic change happened so it may change
/r/MensRights24/06/22 05:09 PM
7

i wont support a "right" that let my child robbed for me no thanks what did women rights activist did for men anyway? nothing its their fight and I hope they lose dont forget how quickly pro choice women budge on bodily autonomy on: circumcision, the draft, vaccine mandates...
/r/MensRights24/06/22 04:46 PM
2

sure champ in 2 more weeks its banned amirite? > Tubals are also not easy to get maybe women should stop suing after regret? btw sometimes its the same with a vasectomy but its not an abortion issue tbh its legal ppl are free to make a charity that gives these out for free
/r/MensRights24/06/22 04:35 PM
0

so? women will pay it too from now on
/r/MensRights24/06/22 04:29 PM
2

and then people will whine about crime rates. How many criminals will you catch at night dressed as a superhero?
/r/MensRights24/06/22 04:29 PM
3

good luck travelling for thousands of miles
/r/MensRights24/06/22 04:27 PM
2

false they sometimes ask questions and the man can register as a father before
/r/MensRights24/06/22 04:27 PM
2

> Don't think this fixes that except in the most extreme of edge cases. This will fix the "do x or y or I abort your child" > I think this will cause more suicides and mental illness than it will fix. You'll have circumstances where neither parent wants the child who get stuck with it. they can use adoption services together > There is no effect / connection here at all. there is, before that if the man wanted to be a single father the woman just aborted the kid now men can be single parents too…
/r/MensRights24/06/22 04:26 PM
1

so is it better to kill them than give them a chance?
/r/MensRights24/06/22 04:24 PM
1

Be abstinent Use birth control Get a tubal so many choices which do not kill > There will also be an increase in rape accusations since many states will now require police reports of rape to have an abortion. Which will further delegitimise false reports since police will now why it happened and women will be punished for false reports
/r/MensRights24/06/22 04:22 PM
2

yes, because otherwise I will have to pay for some dumbasses 32 children who is unable to use a condom
/r/MensRights24/06/22 03:34 PM
2

threat of imprisonment A better option than war. Vietnam war draft refusers got, what 4-5 years then they got released. While many soldiers are rotting in Vietnamese soil.
/r/MensRights16/06/22 10:16 PM
1

Huh? That makes no sense. You totally missed the point
/r/MensRights15/06/22 08:40 PM
3

The military is an organisation where you trade your human rights for some money and a specifically defined "honor". Ukraine case is different in a sense as it defends from an attacker. What armies in peacetime countries does is attack others (esp the US army) violates your human rights, do not have your back as seen from OP's post and tries to cheat you out from benefits promised (Veteran healthcare, college etc)
/r/AntiFeminists15/06/22 02:27 PM
2

Yes, and so do the mid tier. Basically ones that you dont pick up from the street (aka the lowest tier) are treated generally okish. But yeah, well stripper is a very low tier job so if you are some small town street stripper you are the lowest of the low on the work food chain. So yeah.
/r/AntiFeminists15/06/22 11:03 AM
3

will primarily have clients who see women as worthless sex objects Unless the whore is the lowest tier this doesnt even what happens generally. In general, men just treat it as another service. In fact some are rather cordial with sex workers, they go there, pay even talk a bit and leave. Some prostitutes have regular clients for example. So this "imma treated as a sex object" isnt even true in many cases. What these women thunk (wrongly) is that they will be treated as a girlfriend in a pay for…
/r/AntiFeminists15/06/22 10:11 AM
2

So does this chick encourage getting a hooker for your boyfriend? Ehh, kinky but fine by me I treat humans differently and I do think a sex worker is very immoral. Why? Not because I think sex is immoral but because selling your body for more money is the easy path. These people could do other/lower paying min wage jobs but they trade their dignity for money. Hell, good loking women can work in a lot of promoter/waitress/bartender etc roles. You can call a hooker the "princess of the night" or w…
/r/AntiFeminists15/06/22 09:11 AM
3

Ao what holds back the army from mandating paternity tests? Also cannot women pick you out I mean generally people are similar enough, you may tell her your name or your social media...
/r/AntiFeminists15/06/22 09:06 AM
23

Why? It makes no sense. The military should only care about their service members. Honestly, if you are in the military in 2022 (when there are better paying jobs which doesnt violate your human rights) you are an idiot
/r/AntiFeminists14/06/22 09:18 PM
3

I can. But some criminals cannot, and I get blamed for it. Meanwhile all other positive aspects of men are swept under the rug
/r/MensRights14/06/22 08:13 AM
0

A small price for human rights.
/r/MensRights13/06/22 12:48 AM
1

i see but if they cannot provide evidence then it is kinda hard to do
/r/MensRights12/06/22 04:53 PM
1

Do US defendants have to tell the truth in a criminal trial? I thought defendants can lie There is no incriminating evidence
/r/MensRights12/06/22 03:58 PM
2

Men arent a monolith group, a society that was created by a group of men might be not ok for anotherm Also issues need to vhsnge even if men created it Also especislly relevant today, that many obligations went away for women but not for men. We basically have the 1950's for men still. Nothung changed for men basically in societal expectations.
/r/MensRights12/06/22 03:19 PM
2

Where is this evidence from? If it was from a lawyer and it was told in confidence this is probably the fruit of the poisoned tree thus cannot be used in court If you argue a case that you are innocent why does it matter? Its not like the defendqnt will qnswer to any question about sex that implies the sex was nonconsensual
/r/MensRights12/06/22 03:17 PM
2

Ok then.
/r/MensRights12/06/22 02:45 PM
2

him admitting to his lawyers that he raped her That makes little sense. Why would he admit it to anybody? Also kinda jrrelevant for a lawyer vecause the legal team's job is to get a not guilty verdict no matter if it happened or not
/r/MensRights12/06/22 02:28 PM
2

Honestly, I dislike Ronaldo, but I dont think he of all men need to rape someone. It makes little sense, given that he has tons of opportunities to have sex, and any risky thing can literally threaten his career. Even if it happened, 9 M is more than enough to get therapy, and tbh money isnt something that solves this issue. Like a lifelong trauma probably cannot be quantified. But a settlement is made, and was accepted so time to shut up. Its very unlikely someone needs to be coerced into a 9M …
/r/MensRights12/06/22 02:26 PM
8

Equal legislation. If there is a place where women and men are not legally equal, then I am ok with whatever movement wants to make it equal. In west its mens right activists. In the middle east its probably feminism
/r/MensRights12/06/22 02:18 PM
4

If you pay enough in the army, not abuse grunts, they you will have a big enough army. If a state is unable to protect itself it doesnt deserve to exist. I mean so does many men unabke to be front line. There are tons of jobs, in fact, women could do longer civil service. With the option of military ofc. If sport would be mandatory I'd still pusposely fail the physical test. I also don't think women should have to pregnant Why not? The state needs soldiers. Every woman should have at least 3 chi…
/r/MensRights12/06/22 02:16 PM
36

That is a good point but the state isnt entitled to free protection from men. I am perfectly ok taking women's role into account in various stages of life, this doesnt apply to legal equality or cases when the woman is not pregnant. If the woman doesnt want to serve she can get pregnant. If she gets deferment for pregnancy but then gets an abortion to cheat the system she should serve an extra year or 2. Or, just get away with the conscription.
/r/MensRights12/06/22 09:42 AM
1

There is one group nobody blames but they should: the non voters. They a re a massive group yet refuse you drag their asses once in 4 years to vote. Basically, they make too many issues a minority decision, because while they voice their outrage online they do not vote, thus basically a 70% support of something might be only 40% of the whole population's wish.
/r/MensRights12/06/22 01:40 AM
2

Damn dating apps should have warnign labels like cigarettes have. "Warning: after 3 years of dating your relationship counts as common law marriage"
/r/MensRights12/06/22 01:33 AM
1

That is definitely true that women get more dupport, but the aim of my post is that even if men are more violent in general for whatever reason(I am not an expert on the topic so I dunno) society benefits from it. From jobs that need agression or testosteron fueled decisiveness. So I think thunk8ng about agression as ban in general is wrong. As it has positive outcomes. Basically, stop blaiming men from violence while also totally ignoring benefits Basically thats what feminists do. Take all the…
/r/MensRights12/06/22 01:05 AM
2

What causes violence is much less relevant imo than the argument that violence was and currently is beneficial in cases its used correctly, and women benefit from men using violence or agression correctly.
/r/MensRights12/06/22 12:16 AM
5

My point is that on a social level agression has negative effects and positive benefits and only talking about the negative part is doing a disservice to men Its a package deal.
/r/MensRights11/06/22 12:25 AM
1

feminism archieved all its goals. There are total LEGAL equality. If you want total social equality too you are naive. FOr once, some percentage of people will be sexist/racist/radical feminists/terf/religious fanatics etc. You cannot change that Basically, feminism should either close up shop since its goals are archieved, or, you now, focus on non western countries. Fyi the same can be applied to the MRA movement. If we archieve all goals of legal equality I'd be ok to call it quits.
/r/MensRights10/06/22 03:21 PM
2

Is this a reverse twox post? Vtw yes I think there 8s a strong correlation
/r/MensRights07/06/22 10:41 PM
5

This is a manufactured issue Generally rightwing men do not want leftwing women for long term. Short term looks is basically the only thing that matters lol
/r/AntiFeminists07/06/22 09:38 PM
3

Whenever there is a societal problem its very rarely men against women. Its mostly bad people vs good/normal people. Most societal issues its a specific group of men and women who are rich and powerful(due to generstions of wealth) and rhese people simply use their wealth to hurt others and further enrich themselves.
/r/MensRights06/06/22 10:05 AM
1

And after a ban they will still be able to get one for medical necessity, just not for elective reasons
/r/MensRights05/06/22 09:36 AM
3

Mixed. On average male teachers for me was better, but there are great female teachers I had but the worst, generally, were women. 1 sjw feminist and 1 menopausal old hag were the worst
/r/MensRights04/06/22 08:52 PM
1

If teachers dont teach this why are they against these laws?
/r/MensRights04/06/22 05:29 PM
1

Yes. Being in a relationship has costs. Unless you live alone and a fwb just comes in and goes homr (arguably this isnt a relationship) then a relationship costs money. Hecause you generally go out more, spend money on gifts, vacations for 2 people. Often rhe man pays even if its a 50-50 split there are costs. Being single you save a lot of time and money
/r/MensRights04/06/22 05:27 PM
2

Ok. Lets say I agree with you and ok with morals in general. Still having some excluded topics can also be held as a stance.
/r/MensRights04/06/22 04:19 PM
1

No, we still shouldnt allow to make teachers do judgement calls. We should have a rule to make it a neutral place of learning. Does bullying violate that principle? Yes.
/r/MensRights04/06/22 04:05 PM
0

People also have different oponions on the facts and reasoning behind World War 2, so should we not teach it? Correct. And let's get down to the pragmatic levels here. A teacher, by extention of your logic, shouldn't interfere with students getting into fights, bullying or anything that students do to each other, since that's layering down a moral value that these things are wrong to do, which you have deemed is inappropriate These are not morals, these are school rules. Even if njt, stopping th…
/r/MensRights04/06/22 03:44 PM
1

Something being a crime is a fact. It also can be told in a neutral manner. Ok. Lets say, I am ok with talking about morals in school. What if, to incorporate as many backgrounds as possible, we exclude specific topics people generally disagree on? Like fine, mention the moral aspects of WWI, but exclude sexual morals and sexualty from schools? Morals, in general are subjective. Thus, claiming your specific morals or what teachers teach is superior to whatever moral a specific parent has is icky…
/r/MensRights04/06/22 03:19 PM
1

Why cant ,ou teach literature or history about morals and values? You can. Take WWII. You can make history class like a drama class about how evil the axis was and spend 99% of how evil nationalsocialism is or just talk about weapons, movements, what happened, the reasons behind it and mention the various war crimes by simply stating these violated the Geneva convention etc. Lets say, I budge and I am ok with mentikning morals. Still, its reasonable to ask to make it a neutral tone, and eject so…
/r/MensRights04/06/22 02:59 PM
1

So why do Repa have to ban CRT and talking about lgbtq then? Or any secuality in general? Like I want sex ed banned for the same reason, why do teachers cry about it then that they cannot teach about these topics? They can still teach about all the other stuff. Yet they cry about these, why?
/r/MensRights04/06/22 02:25 PM
1

Then this area need to be reformed. Just like Reps do by banning topics to be discussed because they are useless anyway. Again, the common denominator between parents of various backgrounds is a purely science focused, moral free school. Parents then can teach their own values at school everyone is happy. If most teachers would be far right conservatives, would you be ok if they taught children morals? Like gays go to hell, etc? Teaxhers who are not ok with this can resign and be philosophy teac…
/r/MensRights04/06/22 02:24 PM
0

There is, and it can be ignored in school or taught in a neutral manner. Tell me a topic you think cannot be discussed in a neutral tone and I show you you are wrong. Again. For you personally. There is a topic. Preferably, it can be taught in a purely factual manner. If not, which I dont think is the case, it can be taught in a neutral manner. Why would teaching facts and not memorizing them cancelling each other? Schools should teachdata, but using the info sources like the internet or a libra…
/r/MensRights04/06/22 02:15 PM
1

Yes its grooming. Everybody know gays exist, if they dont know about different sexualities yet they are too young to talk about it. Its qay more than gays exist tho. Why do liberal values are taught and not conservative ones? If morals are ok then I think a teacher can say gays go to hell right? Dont even teach that. What If I want go teach that dont be nice to people, and be aware of dangerous people and be nice to those who earn it? I dont want kids be taught morals in school. You can tea h ab…
/r/MensRights04/06/22 02:11 PM
3

Yes, unfortunately some professors give better grades to female students Some teachers are very lefty, and I encountered once the grade A feminist female teacher you cannot even slightly disagree with (in a class about ethics/beliefs/sociology) also women have it bad, women disadvantaged etc.
/r/MensRights04/06/22 02:00 PM
4

Legalising prostitution doesnt affect family life. Many EU countries have it legal unlike the US. Which culture is the poster child of hook up culture? The US.
/r/MensRights04/06/22 01:52 PM
2

Even if you do a total split it costs time, money and effort.
/r/MensRights04/06/22 01:50 PM
2

Yes. Its totally unnecessary to criminalise and it happens even in countries where its not legal. Its technically illegal in the US yet all these loopholes like p"its porn" or "its a sugar relationship" its just hilarious
/r/MensRights04/06/22 01:47 PM
4

There are many cases, both I saw on social media and even personally experienced it. Touching, obsessing over men and biy bands, "best bulge collection on some magazines" paparazzi photos of male stars. Let me touch your hair/body etc. Many of these can be wanted, but if its unwanted its uncomfortable. Sometimes there is a bit of societal pressure to let it happen so other guys and girl see you are not shy or "lame". Then dont forget all the stories of drunk women. Then all those cases where the…
/r/MensRights04/06/22 01:43 PM
0

Why are you interested in theorietical stuff? It has little value today. We need solutions to real problems like education not ramblings about philosophy. Since you are unable or unwilling to grasp simple concepts like an idea of "why should the school be a purely science based place of learning" or an idea about "why should morals be taughts by parents only" then I think more advanced topics would be above your pay grade, so to speak. Additionally, since I feel you are antagonistic towards me, …
/r/MensRights04/06/22 01:30 PM
0

I have a whole comment which expla8ns the stuff you asked and your only response was "nah its not true" I asked what claims need proof. You asked about stuff like grooming. Get this, if a teacher wants to talk sexual stuff for young kids most parents consider that grooming. Parents, especially conservative ones dont send kids to teach them crt, lgbtq agenda, how evil our ancestors were etc. If thats what you want to teach your kids send him to private school or teach it at home. Beliefs dont bel…
/r/MensRights04/06/22 01:26 PM
0

Let me put it this way. Have you ever heard of Plato, Aristotle, Socrates? Morons, compared to me.
/r/MensRights04/06/22 01:21 PM
5

Yep I participate in the pro life subreddit and post about abortion and we get flooded with buthurrt users anytime an abortion restriction is posted
/r/MensRights04/06/22 10:54 AM
3

While I live in the EU and fortunately get less affected by these prog movements I am unfortunately still affected. But many stuff that happened recently (elon and twitter, Disney got told to stop, Roe leak, Depp trial, Desantis picking up on father's problems, covid restrictions end) makes me more gloom than doom.
/r/MensRights04/06/22 10:53 AM
0

Everything you adked was backed up and your theories deboonked.about the groomer part just check for any news where teachers cry they cannot teach crt or lgbtq bs.
/r/MensRights04/06/22 10:50 AM
1

I am not uninformed, others are stupid and dont understand my great ideas, it seems. Like if you want to teach morals and stuff to your child why not send him to a sharia school? I am definitely smarter than those people. Many of them lived in an age where they thought a lightning is gods wrath, and the remaining of them live today are teachers in a massive leftwing bubble and cry about crt and shit. Therefore I am the correct one. Since you think education is the same as smarts Its obvious i am…
/r/MensRights04/06/22 10:49 AM
1

Nobody knew it will be a pandemic in 2019. There are many viruses which doesnt turn into a worldwide pandemic How was the pandemic in Ireland? Did people comply? If so why did kore people comply compared to the US? What do you mean by "didnt compromise"? Winter of illnes I was responding to a US White House announcement that basically wished happy Christmas to the vaccinated but told basicaly that the unvaccinated are "in for a winter of death and illness" which of course did not happen on a lar…
/r/MensRights03/06/22 11:08 PM
1

so? its not like people should listen to politicans anyway. they were just as unaware as the general public the medical "professionals included" Florida probably has lots of people who think dangerous freedom is more important than the false sense of safety. again its not like being more careful was banned it just wasnt forced. Predictably, the immuno-compromised and high-risk populations pay the price with so many people openly transmitting the virus. so they should you know, stay at home. DeSa…
/r/MensRights03/06/22 10:21 PM
0

The public ed is full of idiots teachers and studends too. I was incredibly bored because what was taught was below my skill level
/r/MensRights03/06/22 10:16 PM
0

Hell the teachers part on the upbringing of children is a centuries old fundemental aspect of the entire educational field. Then it has to change. I am probably ahead of my time with my great idea.
/r/MensRights03/06/22 10:14 PM
0

It is bad in many places. There are outliers of course.
/r/MensRights03/06/22 06:19 PM
1

Me neither American politics often have an effect on the western world tho.
/r/MensRights03/06/22 06:18 PM
0

Public sector jobs have lower wages generally because they are not that competitive, often has various benefits and let you basically go to retirement from your 1st job in most cases. You get more job safety for less money. The curriculums are made by a group of teachers politicians gov officials etc. It isnt made up on the spot. Generally teachers have to be apolitical because they teach children from various backgrounds. Teaching about lgbtq in a positive light may be unaccaptable to Muslim pa…
/r/MensRights03/06/22 06:16 PM
1

Lets see what the SC says about that soon
/r/MensRights03/06/22 06:08 PM
0

Public ed is shit everywhere
/r/MensRights03/06/22 04:28 PM
0

All of what I said is factually correct
/r/MensRights03/06/22 04:27 PM
0

You cannot have similar wages for a job in the public sector than in the private one. The latter is higher becsuse turniwlver is highery more hours needed, more experience needed etc People have all kind of problems at work and teachers literally complainn that they cannot groom, teach whatever fake crt history and that their fellow teachers can excercise their constitutional right to a gun 🤡
/r/MensRights03/06/22 03:50 PM
1

I am from the EU
/r/MensRights03/06/22 03:46 PM
2

I dont get it. This trial is a "win" for abuse victims. Its a lose for abusers.
/r/MensRights03/06/22 03:14 PM
2

Every single policy has to keep non complience in mind. Every. Single. One. We have entire departments that deal with non complying people. The police and criminal courts. There is a vaccine which protects you on the individual level. Also, you know, the immune system. So thats also false.
/r/MensRights03/06/22 03:12 PM
5

Because while almost all women benefit from feminism this patriarchy screaming bunch is luckily a minority (at this point)
/r/MensRights03/06/22 12:43 PM
1

I dont really care what others think, I know I am right. School must be a neutral place of learning. The teachers are just publicly employed educators nothing more. Basically they are the grunts of the white collar workers or the burger flipper equivalent of the white collar world. They are not moral guidances and whenever tried to claim they are like a second mom or second family I strongly disagreed. Once I had to tell them school isnt my second home, its my workplace I am legally forced to be…
/r/MensRights03/06/22 12:38 PM
1

One of the easiest degrees, union job, white collar job teaching stuff that basically people who just graduated middle school can do. This profession doesnt really bring in the brightest minds. Like you go to uni for 5 years to get 30 k per year. That tells a lot for me. Personally the people I know, the most vanilla chicks and the mediocre ones picked teaching. All of my middle school classmates who had a little bit of enterprenourship or smarts avoided this degree and picked real degrees like …
/r/MensRights03/06/22 12:32 PM
1

Well the teachers job is to teach facts not morals. A teacher has no right to teach any morals because it might disagree with the beliefs of parents. Especially since most cases its a lib teacher grooming, because when a teacher tries to teach conservative stuff he is often fired. Yes its censorship and? You are a teacher not an author. You dont have to teach whatever you want. Like when you have to teach kids about WW2 you have to teach that not talk about My Little Pony. Is this censorship? I'…
/r/MensRights03/06/22 10:10 AM
1

Many are not. Teaching a curriculum is much easier than creating it. I wouldt be qble to create one but I would easily teach middle school stuff as a non teacher. That is true. But an employment place can make its rules and some jobs require owning a gun. Now this will include teachers. Dont like it? Find a different job
/r/MensRights03/06/22 10:05 AM
2

And again, protect8ng yourself against it was allowed nationwide. You just werent forced in some places Tough luck you live in a society. If you dislike freedom and want a false sense of safety I do think being a hermit, or living in a hippy commune or in some communist country is for you. You are right the gun issue is similar. I am not responsible for your health, and I am not responsible for criminals actions.
/r/MensRights03/06/22 10:03 AM
1

There is a kid from conception
/r/MensRights03/06/22 10:00 AM
3

We live in an individualist society. Liberty > safety Yes, and? I never den8ed thst tho there were many incorrect takes However Still protectign yourself was never banned. You just had an opt out unlike in blue states
/r/MensRights03/06/22 12:06 AM
1

What stops men from having 14 children from 12 different women in that scenario?
/r/MensRights03/06/22 12:04 AM
1

you sure about that? i think it would be a massive increase because then it would actually encourage having baby mamas. I mean what stops you from having 14 kids in that scenario? I generally think it would be a good policy but it has risks
/r/MensRights02/06/22 11:03 PM
3

all protect stuff was allowed like wearing a mask or vaxxing people should be smart enough to make decisions in 2022. I for one generally totally ignore what out Great leaders say and do what i think is correct again people were allowed to deal with this however they wanted. vast majority of them are fine even today
/r/MensRights02/06/22 11:01 PM
1

child support would still be a thing just by taxpayers
/r/MensRights02/06/22 10:35 PM
3

all of the protection decisions was allowed the government isnt your parent to micromanage your life if people decide to go out not wear mask not vax its their decision and they will bear the consequences (btw same if you get the vax and have complications since the manufacturers are immune to lawsuits for some reason)
/r/MensRights02/06/22 10:33 PM
2

> You aren't willing to trust teachers to do what is their litteral fucking job. National curriculums were rarely a random teacher's job to create. > But you trust they will know what to do in case of a school shooter because they have a gun. If I were a teacher in that scenario I'd much more be comfortable with being a bit more equal standing with the idiot who shoots up the school while the cops shit their pants outside
/r/MensRights02/06/22 10:30 PM
2

> So we don't trust teachers to develop curriculums for children, but want to arm them. Gun rights is in the constitution, right to teach whatever or groom kids isnt
/r/MensRights02/06/22 10:29 PM
3

yes there are some deadbeat fathers this is a systemic issue, not a "men bad" issue
/r/MensRights02/06/22 10:27 PM
1

> Women feel that men shouldn't get a vote on what happens in their bodies. So are these women anti democracy? Cause in democracy you can vote on basically any issue, no matter how much you are affected. And abortion affects fathers
/r/MensRights02/06/22 10:25 PM
1

I'd generally agree with this however what happens if many men just forfeit? Who will pay for all those kids? I mean men are the vast majority of net taxpayers so its likely that if that happens soon you will pay quite a lot of taxes for someone else's kids
/r/MensRights02/06/22 10:21 PM
1

so why say no uterus no opinion at least be honest and say we only want the voice of PC men
/r/MensRights02/06/22 10:18 PM
1

who cares lol the pro choice push is for abortion up to birth
/r/MensRights02/06/22 10:18 PM
1

There was referendums on conscription and women coukd vote. Majority of them voted yes, keep it.
/r/MensRights02/06/22 10:05 AM
1

Ots time for them to eat the cake they baked. No opinion? Ok, then let the status quo do jts job just as before.
/r/MensRights02/06/22 10:03 AM
17

originally it was important to help women because the world were dangerous and often societies in general hanged on having enough children so women had to be helped (much more then men) obviously its only recently gone, but even if we count "safety" from, say, year 1000, its still merely a thousand year compared to thousands of years of evolutionary instinct.
/r/MensRights27/05/22 10:04 PM
7

so based
/r/MensRights27/05/22 09:44 PM
1

Tbh I am not sure how this case will turn out and possibly Depp isnt fully innocent either so I'd rather wait til the verdict. If Amber will be who loses this case this will be a major blow to the fake accusing cases.
/r/AntiFeminists26/05/22 11:14 PM
30

they basically have to admit Depp is the victim here because its clear who is the abuser for everbody. This is an attempt to show (again, in a case which is crystal clear) that they "believe male victims too" and "we call out bad women too" then ofc probably go back to "believe all women" after this trial is over.
/r/AntiFeminists26/05/22 04:37 PM
1

She didnt finish the "and get away with it part"
/r/MensRights26/05/22 12:43 PM
13

A dad. Also a rarely known person for these type of women
/r/AntiFeminists25/05/22 11:34 PM
-2

honestly? I feel you see too much into it. It will hurt real women victims. It do help male victims but this isnt a good way to get recognition. I dont want high profile men to be abused for male victims to be seen. I just want it as a default.
/r/MensRights25/05/22 04:30 PM
4

femmies are freaking out This is a nuclear bomb level damage to the "women cant be abusers" and the meetoo bullshit. Literally a woman deals the biggest blow to this. I only pity the real victims who will be taken less seriously. Amber literally, but unintentionally become a men right activist by single handedly destroying these false narratives
/r/MensRights25/05/22 03:22 PM
2

Yes. Unless its a gift to her, even then it can be risky throwing it out of a window. You can also sue girlfriends who do not give your stuff back, or destroy it after a break up.
/r/AntiFeminists24/05/22 08:41 AM
31

Its truly disgusting these poor kweens have to share the world with "m*n" like these
/r/AntiFeminists23/05/22 04:56 PM
29

Are you a caveman lol, real men are evolved and can read the mind of women today... /s
/r/MensRights23/05/22 04:22 PM
23

Yeah and when women see a 6 pack they NEVER roll their tongue/lick their mouth etc,
/r/MensRights23/05/22 04:21 PM
3

this is so ordinary that its unlikely to be made up
/r/MensRights23/05/22 04:20 PM
89

These men are nothing compared to men who rape their blow up dolls.
/r/AntiFeminists23/05/22 04:03 PM
1

Women think they are compley and all the quirks and moods have to be learned by men. Women also think men are simple and sex + sometimes food means you treat your man good. And sometimes due to this men actually content with these low expectations.
/r/MensRights23/05/22 01:16 PM
-2

Men are privileged by birth = truth Lgbtq people are special = being proud of who you are Having penis... = truth Being drunk and alone at night is more risk to be abused= victim blaming Men collectively rule the world = truth Lizard people/ deep state runs the world = conspiracy theory Men are opressors = truth Islamic countries oppress Christians = islamophobia Nice world we got here. Truth is meant as "truth"
/r/MensRights23/05/22 01:13 PM
1

She may think you are trolling. Women sometimes act as a jerk with men, just because they are men, but this situation is bear-able.
/r/MensRights23/05/22 01:07 PM
5

Amber Heard mens right activist icon. Dealt and continues to deal a mortal blow to the MeToo movement (the false accusation/changed my mind on consent 30 years later part)
/r/MensRights23/05/22 01:04 PM
1

I know these are troll bills, basically the proposer knows it will never pass but wants to make a statement. But I would reaaaally like to see what would happen if it passes, and some cop tries to haul a young guy away to forced sterilisation. (hint: brap brap pew pew)
/r/MensRights22/05/22 05:24 PM
2

DeSantis I think. At least he introduced the 50 50 custody law if I recall correctly
/r/MensRights21/05/22 03:02 PM
2

No. Its a loud minority who hate men, but almost all enjiy the various advantages (at the disadvantage of men) of being female.
/r/MensRights21/05/22 02:58 PM
3

Its safer to do a job with access to military grade equipment than bejng a 35+ BMI unhealthy woman? Who would have thought?
/r/MensRights21/05/22 11:52 AM
1

Either accept the risks of long term legal relationship or dont even cohabitate
/r/MensRights21/05/22 11:48 AM
1

No. Again its a persecution complex. Its men have various problems in life. Most of it is modern world related. And they are saved from depression or problems that is modern world related. Also guess what, not everbody is religious. Thus religion isnt a solution for all problems, or for the non religious, any problem. But this wasnt an anti christian meme.
/r/MensRights21/05/22 11:01 AM
0

You christians should be able to better understand when a meme praises your religion or when it does not. Here you see a famous person save depressed men. Kinda like Jesus, obviously not in the exact same sense. There are menes inChristian subreddits too. Like when there are memes with Jesus its often just a joke, but many actually make Christianity cool.
/r/MensRights21/05/22 09:54 AM
8

There is no need for child support in 99% of the cases. 50/50 custody unless one parent rxplicitly asks not to, consents to child support or unable to care for the child.
/r/MensRights21/05/22 09:51 AM
2

There's a reason fratricide killed so many platoon leaders in nam Based
/r/MensRights20/05/22 08:18 PM
2

Does DOD personnel have some code of ethics? Cuz trolling on subreddits are kinda icky. Tho shaming someone or calling for conscription isnt a political opinion? I hope you werent joined because some troll shamed you to join. Not that it works on men today. I'd rather sip a cocktail while you military tough guys die for oil or some random politican but hey. Your life your choice.
/r/MensRights20/05/22 07:20 PM
2

I thought so.
/r/MensRights20/05/22 04:56 PM
3

Are you in the military?
/r/MensRights20/05/22 04:16 PM
1

If the situation is its prison, then just let yourself arrested if you cannot escape. You will probably be pardoned soon, even if not, its better to be in prison then in an active warzone If they kill people who refuse consciption, any man, woman or child who attempts to forcibly conscipt you lost his or her right to life. Proceed accordingly.
/r/MensRights20/05/22 04:13 PM
5

Its 2022 marriage is a meme. I dont want the state jn my private life at all.
/r/MensRights20/05/22 04:07 PM
1

Beuty is personal taste. I think she is fine but not really SI material. Especially as a fat woman. Kinda not a sporty one. Its 2022 and you spark an outrage by claiming a fat women is not beautiful. Meme timeline we have.
/r/MensRights20/05/22 04:04 PM
12

Alex Jones was right (again)
/r/MensRights15/05/22 07:54 PM
3

👍
/r/MensRights14/05/22 09:36 PM
3

Good luck
/r/MensRights14/05/22 09:35 PM
3

why I refuse to contribute to the global population. We all thank you for it.
/r/MensRights14/05/22 08:25 PM
3

Cope. Abortion is gone. Roe is #aborted. L+ratio+no abortion+ cope+ cucked Also why do you worry about abortions? You will never be a situation where you cause a pregnancy lul
/r/MensRights14/05/22 08:24 PM
1

Lack of masculine men will lead to a society that will need thise man again. Women like masculine men because its biological, just as a young and pretty 24 year old will be liked by a lot of men. Biology.
/r/MensRights14/05/22 08:18 PM
3

I mean its your life. Me, as an atheist have very few sacred principles in life. One of these is my dog is mine, and nobody takes it from me especially not some bitch.
/r/MensRights14/05/22 08:16 PM
3

Its not about the money. Its about sending a message. Tho I can't really understand why would you let your dog be taken. I'd definitely "dognap" my dog lol.
/r/MensRights14/05/22 07:26 PM
1

On second thought for point 5: being masculine is beneficial for societal success but mental health is the most important. So I think there are studies about masculine men having success but also studies about men's mental health issues.
/r/MensRights14/05/22 07:21 PM
1

Hiw can anybidy create any gendered space in an age where you can recognjse as any gender? Just walk there as a cis guy and recognise as a woman for 3 seconds.
/r/MensRights14/05/22 07:11 PM
2

1, Yes, I heard a lot of times from various people that my criticism or frustration I felt justified was whining. Very few times I realised later they were right but mostly I still think those were right. 2, yes and yes. I think it helps in life. It should not be somethng forced but it should be encouraged. 3, I do. While I find it easy to express them sometimes I think what the response will be. 4, Yea. Being soft should be more accepted, but the most important: legit and angry criticism should…
/r/MensRights14/05/22 06:55 PM
2

Women cry about 9 months of pregnancy, where you are socially pampered and have additional legal protections. This is stupid. Its strange because while Singapore is a dictatorship it seems they have some smart ideas. I dont get why anyone wants an unmotivated cop or firefighter. That commenter you linked is an idiot.
/r/MensRights14/05/22 06:42 PM
1

Minda stupid. They are a rich country, dont they have enough firefighter applicants?
/r/MensRights14/05/22 06:14 PM
1

I dont get it, does singapore conscrips cops?
/r/MensRights14/05/22 05:31 PM
1

religious fundamentalism I agree with you that. I dont even like tradcons on many issues. But abortion is different because its someone else's rights. Like you are a man is expected to protect your family but has to be ok if your partner kills your child? has done as much damage to the rights of men as radical feminism. Thats is untrue however, the latter is way worse for men. I recognise that's something you would struggle to wrap your head around. I am smart enought to get a lot of concepts. A…
/r/MensRights14/05/22 04:55 PM
1

"there are as many as 36 waiting families for every one child who is placed for adoption" https://www.americanadoptions.com/pregnant/waiting_adoptive_families Fuck it, have your right wing hellscape 'utopia', because that's all this abortion issue is, another wedge issue to accelerate the transition into a draconian governance indistinguishable from religious fundamentalism. That is basically what aborting Roe means. THat leftwingers cannot force a way to live on rightwingers. Cali ppl can have …
/r/MensRights14/05/22 04:43 PM
1

A rape accusation needs proof because its a crime thus the accused are innocent until proven guilty. Its not a bug its a feature. will also force the state to pick up the slack and use taxpayer money to give the parents support. Most unborn will be adopted by infertile couples and ppl who want to adopt. You wouldn't touch any of these unwanted kids with a six foot pole.You just want to force your ridiculous ideology upon everybody else because muh christianity How do you know that? Just like you…
/r/MensRights14/05/22 03:44 PM
1

I answered already. I support the rape exception. I am not a visionary, so I dont know how would I react in that specific scenario. I wouldnt force her to keep the baby. What does pro rapist means? I nevrr saw anybody hold that position.
/r/MensRights14/05/22 01:38 PM
1

I personally support the rape exception, and I also believe either laws will too, or other solutions like emergency contraception will help. The mental issue comment was about men who's wanted baby were aborted. Long term: all our systems are built on slow but steady growth. Especially the pension system There are various currently unknown effects thst may or may not happen. Will BC use and sterilisation rises? We dont know yet. How many additional children will be born? How many will be adopted…
/r/MensRights14/05/22 01:36 PM
1

Lack of abortion doesnt hurt men because all these harms can just as well apply with abortion. Any economic or financial issue is tax related, with adjustments in the system these can be solved. But again, unless you want pension we need future workers. So in a long term we benefit. Is your only major goal in life is to avoid paying taxes? Even at the cost of parental rights, a society where right to life is important and even pension? Becsuse you can already do it by becoming a hermit or living…
/r/MensRights14/05/22 01:31 PM
1

Individually it will be the same if the women kept the child. Exact same outcomes. Men who want to be parents will not suffer from mental illness. Socially, short term will be a but harder, but in long term it will be beneficial. Even in short term only assuming more children will be born. If abortion is off the table many people suddenly learn how to use BC properly. You wont have a single cent of pension if the current system goes on with these fertility rates. Rape is a red herring. Many pro …
/r/MensRights14/05/22 12:38 PM
1

You shouldnt really engage with feminists in any situation. Even if there is a goal you agree with and take steps with end it (like ending FGM in some country) you better start another movement without the radfem garbage
/r/MensRights14/05/22 12:32 PM
1

Its not a womans right. Its legal killing. You cant make a law to men let men abort. If a man forfeits parenthood, who will pay for the child? Taxpayers. Who is the net taxpayer group? Men. There is 0 negative consequence for men. We have it so bad that any change only improves our situation because it cannot be worse.
/r/MensRights14/05/22 12:28 PM
2

You already have to if the mom forces you to even with legal abortion. If neither of you want to parent adoption agency is for you. Everything is the same except now men can keep the baby too if they want.
/r/MensRights14/05/22 11:49 AM
1

I am shouting as loud as they are. Just not the message they want to hear. prolife
/r/MensRights14/05/22 11:14 AM
2

In what way does abortion benefit men?
/r/MensRights14/05/22 11:12 AM
1

Those MRAa's should realise that for men the situation will be the exact same in states that ban it. One glaring exception: men's wanted child wont be killed. If neither parents wanna parent they can put the kid up for adoption already. They will be able to do it after Roe falls
/r/MensRights14/05/22 11:12 AM
1

Prime time to troll them
/r/MensRights14/05/22 11:00 AM
6

Its bad and its sexism but ironically if she is a type of woman who would "cancel" you because you are a dude you are also safer not to ride with her (and not grt false meetooed)
/r/MensRights14/05/22 10:59 AM
9

Militarx is just as any other job from the uniform jobs group. Its specific because its a uniform job with all its benefits and hardships, but it is nevessary for it to be voluntary. Imagine a cop who is forced to be a cop. Its 2022, current tech level it doesnt even make sense to conscript. Its just straught up cruelty at this point and utterly unnecessary for any country that has more advanced warfare technique than "guys here is some ww2 weapon shoot the enemy"
/r/MensRights14/05/22 10:56 AM
1

What happens if you suddenly recognise as a woman?
/r/MensRights12/05/22 09:46 AM
1

Listen, I dont agree with restricting BC. However most bills are relevant after they are passed and in effect. I dont think thats the case. Most of these well fearmongering is showing not the complete bills, but the drafts. And condom is the best for non long term couples anyway. I dont think the pill is affected. I'd say even in a LTR a condom is useful regardless of any other BC used if you dont even want the chance of kids. > I'd rather be safe than have even the thought of medical care taken…
/r/MensRights11/05/22 01:39 PM
1

I dont really think BC is in danger. At minimum the pill and condoms will be legal. I do think medical reasons will also be exempted, so forgive me if I am not willing to slide down with you on this slippery slope.
/r/MensRights11/05/22 01:18 PM
2

You should definitely support your partner but expect the same or close to the same amount of support. Like "I fix your car?" Better make me a good dinner. No, shitty takeout won't cut it."Need help with a shelf? Oh, I happen to ran out of beer you know." "I am good with kids" "you better be a supportive partner all the time" This obviously only for LTR i couldnt even imagine more effort than a coffee date or maaaaybe a dinner for a ons/non locked in relationship. Definitely no I fix your car. S…
/r/MensRights11/05/22 01:15 PM
1

Fine by me. If I were an American I'd rather risk paying child support then letting some bitch kill my wanted child. Also if neither of them want the child they can use adoption services. Women was always allowed to force parenthood on men and then demabd child support. Now men will be able too! Yay equality. Its the men right sub, nit the woman right sub. Two x is next door sweaty!
/r/MensRights11/05/22 01:08 PM
1

Not my problem. I dont have a uterus. I wasnt "allowed" an opinion. For all I care these green hairdos can seethe all day, I only ask for a coffee and maybe some popcorn.
/r/MensRights11/05/22 01:03 PM
1

L + ratio + no abortions + happy mothers year (soon)
/r/MensRights10/05/22 09:57 PM
1

> So are you happy abortion is banned yes > because of like revenge or something? No
/r/MensRights10/05/22 09:57 PM
0

Its totally unreasonable to assume that a man, who society expects to protect their family even at the cost at his own life, should just clap when his wanted child are killed by his partner. Its a lot of cases, enough to be another reason to ban abortion. From an MRA angle I couldnt even think a reason why should it be legal, actually.
/r/MensRights10/05/22 09:53 PM
1

Women has to be pregnant for 9 months then give up the child vs the man has his child killed and suffers from lifelong mental illness. Yeah, its a hard choice for sure! Especially for men right activists!
/r/MensRights10/05/22 03:31 PM
10

"I know 2 cases so it has to be common"
/r/MensRights10/05/22 03:26 PM
2

Kicking out a large group of any movement would make it crumble. If religious people would stop supporting feminism in any way it would be a term in a dictionary at most.
/r/MensRights10/05/22 01:07 PM
2

Its a bad argument but not because its the patriarchy. It has nothing to do with a theocracy. Its about state rights.
/r/MensRights10/05/22 01:05 PM
15

Finally men will be able to sue for child support too.
/r/MensRights10/05/22 01:02 PM
-1

I agree. This is basically whats done, if Roe is history states csn vote on the issue.
/r/MensRights10/05/22 08:44 AM
1

All countries, except 5, allow the life exception, even deeply religious Muslim ones.
/r/MensRights10/05/22 08:41 AM
7

How about we just be decent and agree the overturning of Roe v Wade is atrocious Not only its not atrocious, its actually great!
/r/MensRights10/05/22 12:14 AM
2

What do you base your vlaim that MRA,'s hate women? I love women, but I hate inequality in our society. There are many issues where an individual women jmin not responsible, and issues where there is a specific wkmen who is a jerk: well in this case people hate her because she is a jerk, not because she is a woman.
/r/MensRights08/05/22 04:37 PM
2

Unless its some kind of phobia I dont think it is. Obviously its a problem if you want a relationship/sex/children and dont want it to be a transactional one (escort/prostitute/surrogate mother)
/r/MensRights08/05/22 12:28 PM
6

They had it federally for 50 years, the major opponents for male reproductive rights were feminists. I shit you not, when I suggested abstinence they were flabbergasted, and the same user 2 comments later said "if you dont want kids as a male close your legs"
/r/MensRights08/05/22 11:56 AM
3

Meanwhile abortion being legal gains men no rights. Simply put all other cases are the same for men except one: the mother does not want the child but the man does. Any other case is the same. If neither of them want the child they can put the kid up for adoption. No matter one's opinion on abortion this is a net gain for men from an MRA angle.
/r/MensRights08/05/22 09:23 AM
7

Is this the "you only end safe abortions argument?" Well dont have illegal unsafe abortions. Or fuck around and find out.
/r/MensRights07/05/22 10:18 PM
2

And so do women. Which will make it a pressing issue, thus the system will need to be changed, and if women want more non abortion related reproductive rights they will have to include men too
/r/MensRights07/05/22 10:14 PM
1

Ok the cuck part was in tongue in cheek but basically if you let other people (mostly men) foot the bill for children, instead of the father you will add lot of children who needs support from the state. Meaning more taxes. For all men. Now for me it seems paying for less children by taxes, and more for your own js a more beneficial system Yeah definitely a cut off is needed, again what is better is making 50/50 custody mandatorx if both parents are able to be a custodial parent. This mostly eli…
/r/MensRights07/05/22 08:57 PM
1

Men, meanwhile, do not want to speak with you.
/r/MensRights07/05/22 06:20 PM
0

Abortion is only win for MR if it men would have a veto. What is more important? Potential to avoid a lifetime of mental anguish or money?
/r/MensRights07/05/22 06:19 PM
2

If men dont want to be fathers they could technically abandon it with a law change, the real problem is if you make society the "father", the taxpayers (most NET taxpayers tend to be men) will foot the bill. Effectively making men fathers for many children thats not theirs. Isnt this technically being cucked by the state? Thus I was for parental right forfeit until I realised it disincentivises being cautious. And making you the pseudo-father of even more kids through taxes. I rather let the bio…
/r/MensRights07/05/22 05:42 PM
5

My response to forced vasectomies: You want my balls? Come and take it.
/r/MensRights07/05/22 11:54 AM
1

If a country enslaves you I am sure you can apply for refugee status in another country. Which one will it be then?
/r/MensRights07/05/22 11:52 AM
2

Only PC men according to feminists
/r/MensRights07/05/22 11:51 AM
1

The gov already forces you to have a child. As a man. Now its just nobody can get out from parenthood before that only women could. Also adoption exists. No matter what men will pay for children. Either through personally, or in taxes for the foster kids. Would you rather pay for your own kid or make men pay for rheir own or should every male pay for all kids who arent theirs?
/r/MensRights07/05/22 11:50 AM
19

Men are already forced into parenthood. Nothing changes for men who dont want to be fathers. Meanwhile men who want their child will be probably saved from a lifelong of mental issues. And they will be able to sue for child support too finally.
/r/MensRights07/05/22 11:45 AM
1

Surely you are smart enough to recognise the difference between a case where its right to life vs bodily autonomy, vs op"s case which is his BA vs his chick"s whining. You do realise pro lifers also think BA is important right? Just right to life is more important which is not affected here.
/r/MensRights04/05/22 07:33 PM
1

Dont be a people pleaser at all and especially not in this case. Its your body
/r/MensRights04/05/22 01:15 AM
3

If you even think about a vasectomy at age 20 while wanting children for a 1,5 yr old relationship (meme tier at this age, sorry not sorry), you should very quickly forget it Red flag the size of the Denali if she thinks a permanent body modification should be ever suggested in this situation, severe case of entitlement
/r/MensRights04/05/22 01:12 AM
3

I asked the same in some femin subs. The response is basically, either end it fir everybody, or sure, make it equal (easy to say when its not really a possibility) Also its men fault ofc that wars and conscription exists.
/r/MensRights02/05/22 12:02 PM
1

For the PC men here beiing pro life lets men have much more agency. If they want to be a dad, they are saved from their wanted child being killed, if the woman dont want to be a parent and neither you you can put the kid up for adoption. Men win with pro life laws
/r/MensRights09/04/22 10:27 AM
0

Well you following Menrights and they bejng feminists means that you are kinda each other's red flags. Like why would you want to date a feminist women esp the Reddit feminist kind? So yes, its a red flag. For them. Because they set up their life according to their ideology in which ppl like Peterson is a danger to their ideology, thus its a red flag. For you, or traditional men, or believers of free speech, saying "listening to Peterson is a red flag" is a red flag itself.
/r/MensRights09/04/22 10:11 AM
5

I think they should exist, personally I wouldnt really care about who can come in vs price or equipment
/r/MensRights02/04/22 01:39 AM
3

Seems like a nice post. Imo there is 2 ways we could go on: back to the traditional ways of life with clearly defined roles for the sexes OR total equality, with 0 benefits for being a woman or a man. So exact same amount of days off, retirement age, lack of military service or registration for it for both sexes. So no negative nor positive discrimination I'd be content with both scenarios
/r/MensRights02/04/22 01:24 AM
1

Lol no. You cannot have 50% representazion for a group that makes up 1 or less % of the population (trans ppl) And the most qualified ppl should be in politics ideally, the ppl who got the most votes realist8cally. You want equality of outcomes, aka affirmative action for women. This is very sexist. Women can run for office. You cannot force people to vote for these candidates. Do you want 50% representation in frontline soldiers, trash collectors, coal miners too?
/r/MensRights31/03/22 10:54 AM
2

Ideal for the vast majority of men for a good chance for a happy life, success with women etc. This traditional type of man was tested throughout history, and jt worked. All societies respected masculine men. Therefore, since this way of life is beneficial to the vast majority of men, society, while shouldnt mandate it, should strongly encourage it.
/r/MensRights31/03/22 09:28 AM
1

Yes, but again, what goals are need to be met? For equality, even some programs like affirmative action would need to be szopped since it goes against equality. I feel equality has been archieved, in the legal sense. Social approval is not something that can or should be mandated, like equal treatment before the law can
/r/MensRights31/03/22 09:24 AM
2

They can be lol its just not ideal. Being masculine is more than who attracted to you > Men care so much if women find them attractive- I don't get it Well wanting sex and companionship and children is kinda a biological urge
/r/MensRights30/03/22 11:44 PM
1

Its not women in general who are attacked its a specific political movement and specific, horrible women are attacked. If you dislike a subreddit you can make a new one. Even if this subreddit would attack women in general free speech exists, and since Reddit openly allows male bashing, why shouldnt they allow woman bashing too if they care about so called freedom of speech?
/r/MensRights30/03/22 02:20 PM
1

Well, women want to have children too, and a man, who enters into a relationship with the intent to have children is entitled to have children with a woman who enters into a relationship with the same premise, if the woman doesnt want to she should leave the relationship.
/r/MensRights30/03/22 02:13 PM
1

I don't know. I am not a biologist. /s
/r/MensRights30/03/22 02:07 PM
1

They discriminate against boys simply by making academic success based on memorising stuff, sitting silently, but mostly by making acadeic success based on TIME spent on study vs EFFORT/SKILL. If you remember homework did you get 1 or 2 hard assignment, or a lot of easy ones thats easy to do but time consuming?
/r/MensRights30/03/22 01:04 PM
1

He's right. Boy bands, kpop, metrosexual style, any male fashion event etc. Full of nonmasculine men. It is kinda made the ideal in media despite, imo, a vast majority of women like traditionally masculine men.
/r/MensRights30/03/22 01:02 PM
4

I also support these goals for women. What progress that needs to be made that wouldnt harm the rights of other persons?
/r/MensRights30/03/22 12:57 PM
10

Yes, in a long term relationship with the intent of children "Magic" word here: informed consent. Definitely not the case here
/r/MensRights29/03/22 01:55 PM
1

Based
/r/MensRights29/03/22 09:25 AM
2

That depends on whether the judge sees the abuse. Also if your state is no fault divorce or filed for no fault divorce it may be a separate lawsuit. Now, am not a divorce lawyer, but read a bit about divorce law. Technically, it could matter, but the circumstances probably has to be extreme for a man to be freed from paying a lot of money even in this case.
/r/MensRights29/03/22 09:14 AM
9

Well alimony is basically depends on how big the difference js in wealth so famous women qlso pay a lot after a divorce. However Will Smith is giga rich so I think it would still apply(unless his wife have the same amout of money)
/r/MensRights28/03/22 08:23 PM
72

Probably cuz if you divorce her half of his assets are gone plus a fat alimony you can pay
/r/MensRights28/03/22 02:38 PM
1

I think the whole stuff is fake to boost numbers btw
/r/MensRights28/03/22 02:36 PM
2

The part that most concerns me is that some people actually shame Smith about his wife's infidelity Imagine if a guy cheats and people shame the woman for being cucked
/r/MensRights28/03/22 02:35 PM
1

Time to ban abortions
/r/MensRights25/03/22 02:20 PM
2

Well in a way its even worse when someone who supposedly know how to make money doesnt get this (asssuming she didnt just inherit it)
/r/AntiFeminists24/03/22 08:57 PM
9

Own a shop, BMW means she probably has financial knowledge. Doesnt get that the guy tries to minimise sunken cost if the date doesnt trun out well
/r/AntiFeminists24/03/22 12:40 PM
–

Smart men
/r/AntiFeminists11/03/22 01:33 PM
6

Being a man means, above all else, sticking up for and helping anyone who needs it. Well guess I am not a man then. I dont give a fuck about sticking up and helping others. So what I am?
/r/MensRights09/03/22 11:40 AM
2

Because if they have t do something that costs money. Crying about it hoping government will pay for it: cheaper(for the individual)
/r/MensRights09/03/22 11:34 AM
5

If it would a right to call citizens to arms other countries would be forced to return all refugees, which they dont, even if they are men
/r/MensRights08/03/22 10:22 AM
3

Its a communist holiday so I dont celebrate it
/r/MensRights08/03/22 02:25 AM
2

Even from a female centered angle you can say "hey it would be good to support my gf/wife on this day" It would be better to just let men get the day too without any reason but if it can be archieved by citing the reason to help women thats also acceptable for me
/r/MensRights06/03/22 12:07 AM
10

I know, it was a statement from me not towards you. basically when I see a discriminative policy, if possible, I always try to argue in including discriminated people instead of ending it at all (its for positive policies so not the draft)
/r/MensRights05/03/22 12:24 PM
41

I support this but is it that hard to just make it to a personal health day and let every employee get the bonus day off? Whenever I see a positive policy I advocate for including everybody else instead of just arguing against.
/r/MensRights05/03/22 12:13 PM
2

thanks
/r/MensRights01/03/22 09:09 PM
1

I get it and I dont want to invalidate your experience, just most of the success stories are either from good looking men or men from a bygone era I dont want to sound a doomer, and I basically try to incorporate in my life what you say already however the world had changed a lot (if you are not dating rn you may be unaware) and simply put, even before covid places where you can meet people casually are not really a thing like public computer rooms are kind of a thing of the past
/r/MensRights01/03/22 07:43 PM
1

probably have electronic database adnd your name shows up or if you are a man you remain regardless of citizenship
/r/MensRights01/03/22 07:38 PM
1

They bar dual citizens, and according to some, even noncitizen men from leaving
/r/MensRights01/03/22 01:29 PM
0

Its not pushed by the left. Its "pushed" by all of society. Do you have an issue with equality? Right now women have some advantage. To make it more equal wither add these afvantages to men or take it away for women. Good luck with the former. The latter is so out of reality(I dont support it either) its not even worth to talk about. If women would be drafted/added to select8ve service its days would be numbered
/r/MensRights01/03/22 01:28 PM
2

Probably both of you are good lookin and are extroverted, have social skills Also lot of changed since the 2000s. Its not imposs8ble today, in fact even seems easier in reality it seems harder imo
/r/MensRights01/03/22 01:22 PM
5

Well if you are aware of Mgtow and bitcoin you cant be so old Anyway time to upgrade your slang vocabulary to the "kool kidz" version, grandpa /s
/r/MensRights20/02/22 02:17 AM
9

Based is a semi new word meaning "true to yourself and I respect That (basically, there is no clear definition) Nothing to do with biased
/r/MensRights20/02/22 01:38 AM
5

"I support this." -Souverir shop owner & landlord
/r/AntiFeminists12/02/22 07:36 PM
1

Ok first I am going to say I did not had a similar situation, younger than you, probably have less experience but still want to share some insight. 1, Paternity test. Period. 2, Probably a talk with a mental health professional would help. 3, You got to make a decision you feel ok with, at the end of your life you will regret not living your life the way your wanted. Ignore societal expectations etc. But whatever you choose probably there are consequences of having a child. Assuming you wish to …
/r/MensRights12/02/22 06:32 PM
2

Well, I was kinda ok with female only gyms but female only salons are a step too far /s
/r/AntiFeminists10/02/22 05:03 PM
26

Its not men who wishes to end female only places. Female only gyms exist. Men only clubs are somehow bad even if no women want to join.
/r/AntiFeminists10/02/22 12:32 PM
2

Yeah its kind of a last resort and it has many other issues but this is basically the nuclear option for your case. Other suggestions are more like risk/reward scenarios. While I have close to 0 experience on it some countries are much less strict on the religion part of sharia than others. But I wouldnt really recommend it, I just had the idea
/r/MensRights05/02/22 10:39 PM
2

Probably Eastern/Central Europe. You don't have to marry to have kids. Sometimes not being married has similar (often more favourable) conditions than being married. Having wealth before cohab/marriage helps. Also you can make a marriage/cohab contract. Other than that weird stuff like trust fund or living in some sharia country, I dont know or think its good or even legal either just guessing Also working just the amount to pay bills and not amass wealth can be a solution
/r/MensRights05/02/22 10:10 PM
6

Universal, except for convicted rapists
/r/MensRights05/02/22 09:48 PM
1

An artificial womb/long term male contraception vombined (lesser extent: sexbots, but I think its never be a proper replacement) will probably make a major adjustment in the amount of social power women have. Then either economic power will he meaningful only where men have an advantage.
/r/MensRights05/02/22 03:04 PM
1

Cool, who counts as a lady in this business Biological women or its self designated?
/r/AntiFeminists26/01/22 09:48 PM
1

Well, people wont gonna list the bad stuff that they dont miss.
/r/MensRights11/01/22 11:54 PM
1

to never stop being a benefit to society. Why should I? I have my own goals. I am not trying to benefit society with every second of my time. I wont work 60 hour per week when I can work 40 or less. Why would I be a giver? What if I want to be a getter? Also society made new limitations. If you dont see qny change since, say, 2000 in society you are fooling yourself
/r/MensRights11/01/22 11:50 PM
2

Yeah same. Technically it would be possible to do, but you would need all of your friends to be on board, while back then it was the norm. The best would be today's tech and pre social media norms
/r/MensRights11/01/22 11:32 PM
19

Meeting a large group of friends and go to a park, skate/drink somewhere regularly and randomly. Now any of the above has to be planned 2 weeks ahead
/r/MensRights11/01/22 10:46 AM
5

Individual level: treating your family, boyfriend, friends well. Small community level: Speaking up for men, calling out people with anti men behavior. Governmental/societal level: Speaking up about male issues, writing to representatives, online/offline activism, even running for office. Imo the individual level is the most important, it might have the least effect on all men but it is where you can have major impact. Also ty.
/r/MensRights11/01/22 10:42 AM
13

Imo there is the legit traditional/masculinity kind of traditional man and the "tradcon". Latter is badically the right wing equivalent of a male feminist
/r/MensRights11/01/22 12:11 AM
8

Honestly? I dont know at this point. Some women are thankful. Some dont even say ty Some I guess get enraged. Latter is rare in my experience, it never happeend to be personally. I hold open the door for people regardless of sex.
/r/MensRights11/01/22 12:07 AM
1

In most western countries, women enjoy some kind of advantage or privilege in specific areas. 3 most glaring examples are: earlier retirement despite living longer, Being exempt from military service or draft in the vast majority of cases Getting much more financial support or welfare compared to taxes paid in than men
/r/MensRights10/01/22 11:18 PM
1

No, it was always women first. Even when the fight was about voting rights, there was never talk about getting drafted
/r/MensRights10/01/22 11:12 PM
6

If you dislike it so much why do you comment? Why are you on reddit at all? I mean there is much better things to do.
/r/MensRights10/01/22 11:11 PM
18

Chivalry isnt deaf because muh man bad, its dead because we killed it on purpose. Like decades of "I am a strong woman, dont open the door for me". Most males arrived at a point to just say "k fine"
/r/MensRights10/01/22 11:09 PM
1

Why does any offered solution by them make the lives of the entities the solution tries to protect, worse?
/r/AntiFeminists14/12/21 08:26 PM
1

Men only benefit from an abortion ban because its just one more situation where the outcome is positive for a man: when he wants the child but the woman doesnt. Any other situation is exactly the same as adoption exists.
/r/MensRights12/12/21 11:17 AM
1

>> While there are some subjects I am pro-censorship on Like?
/r/MensRights12/12/21 11:16 AM
1

Huh? There are cases where sy is ok with being a single dad. In fact, in the future more women will pay child support if abortion is banned
/r/MensRights03/12/21 07:37 PM
1

Dilate
/r/MensRights03/12/21 07:35 PM
3

At this point, you only have a favourable outcome if you want a children and so does the womqn, or you dont, and the woman also don't. If you want a child but a woman doesnt, your child dies. If you don't want a child but the woman does, well you will pay child support for 18 years. Ending abortion eliminates the former. You will be in a better position as a man, as more favourable outcomes for you then before.
/r/MensRights03/12/21 11:08 AM
3

Huh? Are you aware that how many people want to adopt? For every newborn there are about 36 couple who wants to.
/r/MensRights03/12/21 10:26 AM
1

Yeah no. Right now Roe lets women kill wanted children of men. Hopefully not for long
/r/MensRights02/12/21 02:06 PM
1

And what is the reason society helps women regardless of their strenght, but not men?
/r/MensRights19/11/21 04:07 PM
1

Most social benefits stem from being able to bear children. "How we perceive them" is basically the same what I said, we perceive them as people who need to be protected, for various reasons, including being able to propagate our species. But tell me, how do we perceive women that grants them social advantages.
/r/MensRights19/11/21 03:52 PM
1

I am glad you are happy in your body, and so do I, but all those social advantages women have are interconnected with sexuality, more specifically, being able to bear children. Social advantages in peacetime are a major advantage. And society is and will be mostly peaceful from now on, and don't really count on another large scale conflict (due to nukes) and if it happens, we are fucked anyway. And even in wartime I dont consider being drafted a major advantage.
/r/MensRights19/11/21 10:34 AM
7

9 Afk. Ghost mode. Hermit. Basically try to opt out from mainstream society.
/r/MensRights18/11/21 03:48 PM
13

>> Hell no we are still privileged sexually In what way? Higher sex drive makes us more needy, paternity is much less sure than for women, all the social benefits for being pregnant, being protected, no draft, being a stay at home mom is much more accepted than the equivalent for men etc.
/r/MensRights18/11/21 03:42 PM
5

Cite the Against False Accusations Act and demand a trial by combat /s ​ Joking aside, do you have a lawyer? I wouldnt say a thing without one. If you have one listen to him.
/r/MensRights07/11/21 05:25 PM
2

Well according to OC above the reason is that women enjoy preferential treatment. Imo its also that a woman who wants to be a man can already be a tomboy or a boyish girl. Meanwhile being feminine as a guy is negative. So you either go full women or not at all.
/r/MensRights07/11/21 05:22 PM
1

Most trans ppl are male to female and not the other way around.
/r/MensRights07/11/21 02:43 PM
2

I feel very good at being a man. I think having some biological advantages for being a man is great, like higher strenght, no periods, etc. But there are negative effects too, like shorter lifespan. Since the advantages are biological, and thus no fault of men, I find it insane that for these advantages (while ignoring the disadvantages) society tries to make up for women by legal discrimination, or just preferential treatment. Men did not "ask" for these advantages, and they are not responsible…
/r/MensRights07/11/21 02:42 PM
2

Its a joke
/r/MensRights05/11/21 03:26 AM
6

Ooh uhh sweaty I am gonna quote this comment if you ever become a public figure. Maybe try not to be a bigot next time? /s
/r/MensRights04/11/21 06:57 PM
9

>> biological gender identity They say sex =/= gender. So there is no biological gender, as it is a social construct according to them
/r/MensRights04/11/21 04:59 PM
14

She made a claim that she was raped and drugged. The burden of providing evidence for her claim is on her.
/r/MensRights04/11/21 04:57 PM
1

I am against abortion but I think you should be allowed to unilaterally forfeit parenthood at birth.
/r/MensRights29/10/21 05:11 PM
1

Oh I see
/r/MensRights18/10/21 06:55 PM
4

How can you be a modern man? Seriously, I am interested what does it mean.
/r/MensRights17/10/21 05:45 PM
6

Still idiotic since this law is made as the presumption is that while you are ok with sex with condoms, you are not ok with no condom Exact same with your partner having AIDS. You may want to have sex with someone who is healthy but not if he or she has such disease.
/r/MensRights16/10/21 02:42 PM
2

Most of which is family work. Time to charge your grandma for helping her do the shopping! Nothing stops these women to hire a paid helper then work to be able to afford said helper!
/r/MensRights13/10/21 02:21 PM
7

Today's biggest loser is... I mean they did sacrifice themselves for others, which is heroic but it is also stupid And when they did it how men was treated by society were way better. And it was a differnet age. Part of me is sad that chivalry is sent to the gallows but an even bigger part of me is happy its gone
/r/MensRights10/10/21 08:35 PM
18

>> leave the US forever and never enter a country thst enforces international child support or extradition for contempt of court Is there a list?
/r/MensRights03/10/21 07:33 PM
1

So can a man technically put the kid in for a safe haven?
/r/MensRights30/09/21 08:22 PM
2

Is the 72 hour safe haven law written with gendered language?
/r/MensRights30/09/21 10:03 AM
7

White Knight syndrome
/r/MensRights28/09/21 08:57 PM
2

Not to mention, most men are just as aware when walking alone early in the morning or night. Being afraid in most streets at the middle of the day is kinda delusional. Also interesting that people who claim the streets are full of dangerous criminals often argue against gun ownership the next second
/r/MensRights26/09/21 03:41 PM
6

They want the group name for the upcoming transgender heros lmao
/r/MensRights25/09/21 06:58 PM
6

We dont have school uniforms at all in my country and we are doing just fine. Mandatory uniform is stupid policy. I'll elaborate if needed but this issue has a very clear solution for me.
/r/MensRights25/09/21 11:32 AM
1

>> Why would you complain if she returned to the state of non-pregnancy? Besides, as long as it's not viable outside of the mothers body, it's not your child, it's her fetus. Maybe because you are pro life? So even if you try to avoid a pregnancy you are not ok with your child being killed? Fetal viablility has nothing to do with parental rights. Biologically you are a father the very second you have an offspring. >> That will only bring back coathanger abortions, with all it's horrible conseque…
/r/MensRights24/09/21 11:55 AM
0

And if she said she is pro life, you used a condom, but it broke, and for some reason she changed her mind, she can still kill my child. The simpler solution instead is just banning abortion. What if, the same logic is used on women? Dont want to be pregnant? You should've closed your legs!
/r/MensRights23/09/21 02:44 PM
1

Having goals and archieving them. The goals and the method of archieving should be both reasonable.
/r/MensRights23/09/21 01:12 PM
1

Unfortunately, as a man in your early 20's you have to compete with much more estabilished 30 year old men. At 30 year old you have to find time to date. Which would be easier at age 20 but see the former point.
/r/MensRights23/09/21 01:08 PM
1

>> A bit ironic that you want the freedom to have a beard, but want to limit another group of people's freedom to create a space where beards aren't allowed. Exactly. My first amendment rights in a public space (yes, for me it becomes public when it is generally open to public) trumps their right to mandate some archaic dress code. The Constitution and my first amendment rights doesnt end at the university door. But fine, then every student who cannot continue his degree due to this rule change …
/r/MensRights20/09/21 04:35 PM
1

Again, where? Where it is needed for safety. Someone studying pilosophy in a classroom with like 0 lab courses doesnt need one. >> So, this is a private school, so why is it news that a private entity bans certain appearances that everyone can conform to (i.e. not legal discrimination). If the school banned ot after anyone signed a contract, they made an unilateral change in a contract. Which is problematic. Also they have a religious exception. Kinda tiring to force people to fake a religion if…
/r/MensRights20/09/21 03:29 PM
2

In a university you don't have to wear a respirator. Yes, and some workplaces ban long hair, so? Ban due to safety reason vs ban due to ideology is rather different. Next time you gotta dress as Bob the Builder in university because some people have to wear safety helmets at work lol
/r/MensRights20/09/21 01:54 PM
2

Accusing someone with rape is a much more serious crime than accusing with other crimes. Even the accusation destroys, and ends lives. As accused commit suicide. So thats why that low rate if true, is still unacceptable. "Rather let 1000 criminal run, then hang 1 innocent man" About 1 percent of abortions are done due to rape yet this number is used several times to justify on demand abortion
/r/MensRights17/09/21 02:56 PM
5

Does this number about rape is cases where the rapist was convinced, or just the rate of reports?
/r/MensRights17/09/21 02:50 PM
2

I heard the exact same idiotic argument from pro choicers so hard to decide. No wonder you are being downvoted lol
/r/MensRights15/09/21 08:15 PM
1

both genders Hmmm... both Isnt this enough to cancel her according to sjws?
/r/MensRights15/09/21 03:32 PM
5

You forgot /s, right?
/r/MensRights15/09/21 09:19 AM
3

Gonna do nothing. Not only few women will join, as they have needs too, pro life men dont really care about liberal women, they will have sex just fine with other pro life or conservative women. Least effective strike I ever heard about.
/r/MensRights15/09/21 09:12 AM
1

I am actually kind of agree that religion has an empact, however high education =/= intelligence. Also, since most academia are leftist, and most profs are leftwing its biased. SO correlation doesnt mean causation ​ If the Republican party cared about reducing the abortion rate outside of moral inconsistencies, could you explain to me why they advocate against the social safety nets and policies that greatly reduce abortion numbers across the US? Sure. First, I am convinced the PL issue isnt the…
/r/MensRights14/09/21 06:21 PM
1

Ok, 1 last question. In your opinion, why do pro life countries implement pro life policies? If your assumption is true, and it doesnt help men but only harm women, answer the following 1, Why is pro life movement such a big group then? It includes non religious, men, women, people of all races? About 40 or 50% of America are pro life 2, WHy do some countries implement pro life policies if it helps noone? 3, Why do you see many parental right group, and many conservative/right wing men (and wome…
/r/MensRights13/09/21 10:05 PM
1

So what you're telling me is that your stance consists of: No. Taking rights away from people is bad. However, abortion isnt a right, its a privilege. And since women already have 100% of reproductive rights and men 0, the only way forward to make the 2 sexes more equal is to curb female reproductive privilege. You know, when you are privileged, equality feels like oppression. I sense that their is some misunderstanding that I hate women. No, thats absolutely not the case. But I would still like…
/r/MensRights13/09/21 07:58 AM
3

>> but I can say I’m a casual feminist? cause I believe in women’s rights. You can say what you wish, but beyond a certain point, especially in the west women's equality becomes women superiority. Women, imo in modern societies enjoy the same rights as men. Whatever social expectation remains is hard to change since its thousand year old beliefs or values, and I dont think they are an obstacle to female equality Maybe call yourslef an egalitarian? Today there are areas where women are still behi…
/r/MensRights12/09/21 09:20 PM
1

This law only gives rights back to men. Only change, is that in cases where men who want their child but their woman do no, get to keep the child. If neither of them does not want parenthood, like in OP's example, they can put the kid up for adoption. No parental responsibilities after that. Nil, nada. While women could, at will, force men to be parents. And pay child support. For men, there is only gain in some situations. No loss on any other.
/r/MensRights12/09/21 10:56 AM
1

Outside of pro choice blabla about women, how does pro choice laws protect MEN's , again, for clarity, MEN's rights especially parental rights?
/r/MensRights12/09/21 12:48 AM
1

I am pro life. And I aware that its not an alternative to pregnancy. But I dont care. Pro life laws and policies protect fetal and parental rights, pro choice policies take them away.
/r/MensRights12/09/21 12:00 AM
4

Rich men. Poor men are fucked, just like everywhere else
/r/MensRights11/09/21 02:14 PM
3

According to SJWs, not wanting to date a man who claims he is a woman is transphobic. We are way past the "fatphobic" part.
/r/MensRights11/09/21 02:09 PM
1

Will future generations condemn us for abortion? Thousands of current people, even from the recent eneration are already condemn abortion. Pro life gen z people are already condemn the SC for Roe. Whether posterity will judge us either way I dont care about. While I think they will condemn abortion in the future, even if they will be 100% pro choice I dont care. I do what I know is just today.
/r/MensRights11/09/21 02:07 PM
1

Why killing a grave criminal is abhorrent but not for an innocent baby?
/r/MensRights11/09/21 01:23 PM
1

And? As a man this doesnt affect me
/r/MensRights11/09/21 10:04 AM
0

Least relevant part of the abortion debate. I think your definiton is faulty but I dont come down and correct you every time I see your comment.
/r/MensRights10/09/21 10:45 AM
1

1, Again, what anti-men stance society has on fatherhood is something i fight against. Not a paternity test makes me a father. If I am the bio father I am a father. Regardless the child was hidden from me, that another guy signed the paper, etc. I am the father. 2, Its punishment because fatherhood is taken away from men due to a biological difference. Women have it harder so me as a men have no parental rights. Uh huh, no thanks. 3, Regardless, the chance is minimal. In a modern country very fe…
/r/MensRights10/09/21 10:44 AM
1

Why is he anti women?
/r/MensRights10/09/21 12:37 AM
1

If you don’t care for women and think they should be treated like shit, you obviously don’t like women, therefore you must be gay. Stupid take. Just because someone is gay it doesnt mean he hates women. Someone hate women doesnt mean he is gay lol. Maybe he hates dealing with thwm but likes having them as sex partners. Aka, not gay. I dont know how you arrived to the conclusion that pro life = gay. But ok. Pro lifer motivation inst aboit hating women. And you know that
/r/MensRights10/09/21 12:09 AM
0

Point is, arguing about grammar is irrelevant. You can call him a fetus, I'll call him a baby
/r/MensRights10/09/21 12:05 AM
1

Preach brotha Is Biden even clinically alive? Well he gotta til he is past half of his term so Hyena Harris can have 2 and a half term (potentially)
/r/MensRights09/09/21 11:43 PM
7

And the daughter can just randomly accuse her father with rape regardless if its true. And everybody will believe the girl and the dude's life is ruined if he is innocent. Let that sink in.
/r/MensRights09/09/21 11:40 PM
0

Some gay dudes have vives you know. Whats hard to understand? I dont see why someone who is pro life = gay but whatever
/r/MensRights09/09/21 11:37 PM
1

English: unborn baby. Source: nobody shouts down pregnant mothers who want the baby when they say "I am having a baby"
/r/MensRights09/09/21 11:28 PM
1

Parenthood is a biological fact. 2, Its not the who has it better game. Women has it worse then men regarding pregnancy? So? Its how we as a species developed. Its not mens fault. So they shouldnt be punished for it. 3, false numbers. Much less than that. 4, So? Would you rather be poor or dead? Better being a foster kid than dead. 5, So? Killing half of the foster kids would let the others have more resource per capita. We dont do it because its gravely immoral. Same reason against abortion 6, …
/r/MensRights09/09/21 08:23 PM
4

Nothing to hide isnt whats important. Its having proof that you didnt do what you were accused of. Make copies of the footage. Multiple copies and saves. Like, now. You cannot really defend yourself from baseless accusations but in the court case time or place may be specified. If she wont be able to at least pinpoint I think your lawyer will make a point about it to the judge. People generally know when a bad thing happened to them Don't be scared. Be prepared. There isnt a 100% proof to anythi…
/r/MensRights09/09/21 05:31 PM
0

So? Their lack of intelligence is their problem. Educate themselves. People do have standing wheter an action they view as murder takes place. Does not effect them is not really relevant. Women not beinh able to get an abortion doesnt effect me, and neither many pro choice men. Freedom of speech is directly in the constitution. Abortion isnt. Abortion access merely hangs on a court case. I understand how basic human rights work. Thats why I am pro life. No, I did not say it is easy. But its cert…
/r/MensRights09/09/21 05:24 PM
0

Dont gatekeep being women and men! No true Scotsman fallacy /s
/r/MensRights09/09/21 04:51 PM
1

Yes. Whether after forfeiting custody the rapist woman should be given custody is another matter. But if the man forfeited, 0 legal responsibility. So yep. Man 100% custody, woman pays child support. Woman raises child alone. No support. If she is unable to raise him on her own(because she is in prison) step 3. 3, Adoption. Not just rape. Same if lied or tampered with BC. I do feel a time comes when before every sex people will make a smartphone "contract". What kind of sex with what intention, …
/r/MensRights09/09/21 04:35 PM
1

Yes. As I said, parents are responsible for their children until being able to give it to custody. From the women's part this is gestating. From the men's part, financial and emotional support, helping the woman rest, move, etc. Refraining from actions that would hurt the baby. You are responsible for your child until you can safely put him up for adoption. Kind of like with born babies. Except the gestating part, still you still have to provide help, care etc for your child. Using your body, al…
/r/MensRights09/09/21 04:14 PM
1

No, I think the driver would be investigated even if he just drove the robber to the bank. Why shouldnt lawful citizens be denied to sue lawbreakers? There is a reason the law exists. And itshard to hard to decide what actions affect me. The point is you can't sue the person back for lawyers fees when you successfully defend yourself. Where is that wrotten? All I see is that you dont get awarded legal fees. You dont need a lawyer for every case btw What if the democrats pass a law that says anyo…
/r/MensRights09/09/21 04:07 PM
1

You have to appear before a court. No, you dont have to have a lawyer. Many people just appear without one. So if someone is saying you did It is a testimony. Your testimony is that you didnt. This is a he said she said case at this point. The police can investigate. In a civil case? It's down towards the bottom that it says the law explicitly says you can't sue for lawyers fees. Where? All I say that the case won't award you legal fees. Nothing about whether you can sue after the case. But I mi…
/r/MensRights09/09/21 04:01 PM
8

Get a lawyer. Try to find recording or witnesses that it never happened. Hope you have a judge that respects presumption of innocence. Countersue. You will be tired at the end but dont let it go unpunished. Sue. Hire only men.
/r/MensRights09/09/21 03:36 PM
1

So? Its a free market but there are regulations. If a company cannot keep up, they go under. Happened many times. Or they can simply not cover the legal costs? You think if someone asked an uber ride to the bank then started a bank robbing the driver wouldnt be questioned at all?
/r/MensRights09/09/21 03:07 PM
1

They don't have to prove you did anything. You have to prove you didn't. Why do you think that? Does the US have some rule that flips the burden of proof that I dont know about? If your neighbour sues you that you stole 100k from him you have to prove you didnt? The police have to catch you doing something to charge you unless they plant evidence or something. Huh? The police can investigate you know. That costs time and money which you aren't able to sue back for in order to get compensated for…
/r/MensRights09/09/21 03:02 PM
2

I dont say dont have sex. But society says so for men. Used BC but condom broke? Bam, child support. Women lied about BC? Bam, child support Women drugged and raped? Oh, in that case nothi... I mean sike! Bam child support. I am not religious so i dont give a shit about casual sex however I have a beef with abortion. I am avare the 2 sexes are different, and that mens role in impregnation ends at sex (but they still help their partners with money, emotional support etc) Still, outside of pro lif…
/r/MensRights09/09/21 02:58 PM
2

Uber literally said on social media that they will cover the drivers legal cost lol
/r/MensRights09/09/21 02:51 PM
2

The burden of proof isnt on the accused. Where does the law says that? You dont have to have a lawyer for every simple court case. Educate yourself over your own laws, simple cases aren't rocket science. Whatever you think about abortion is irrelevant to this. Oh, its far from irrelevant. Every other pro life law were blocked. This stands right as we talk. If only pro choicers let red states make their own laws. This law has random citizens enforcing a law that should only be the purview of the …
/r/MensRights09/09/21 02:31 PM
0

Its time to decide as a society. Either we held the right to life so sacred that even the worst war criminals have it, or we allow killing fir societal or personal gain. Time to choose. I am aware of the pro life pro death penalty angle (innocent vs criminal) or the pro choice anti death penalty angle (non sentient vs sentient human) but these stances do suffer from at least a slight hypocrisy.
/r/MensRights09/09/21 02:24 PM
2

Right now, its literally "dont want to be a parent, keep it in your pants" for men. So it is the same for women then. I am pro life anyway, but from the men rights angle, until women and the state can force men to be a parents, I rather support a law that lets fathers want to keep their babies. I am aware that the MRA movement supports financial abortion instead of pro life laws. But right know, there is a total inequality between men and women in reproductive rights This law at least erases one…
/r/MensRights09/09/21 02:20 PM
1

Who has the burden of the proof in a court case? Not the accused Wanna go 100% safe, just deny rides to planned parenthood.
/r/MensRights09/09/21 01:03 PM
1

Fetus: offspring in latin. Aka, baby.
/r/MensRights09/09/21 01:01 PM
3

women who want control of their own body Just suck it up and woman up already.
/r/MensRights09/09/21 01:01 PM
3

Female genital mutilation can be safe in a hospital you know. Oh, I know someone who's religion mandates cutting off ear at birth. Can he do it? This religion happens to only mandate cutting off female ears.
/r/MensRights09/09/21 01:00 PM
0

Maybe us men should also start to scream then. Big group of angry men isnt easy to dismiss
/r/MensRights09/09/21 12:57 PM
2

But there were a case about vaccines where bodily autonomy got a blow so its not like they are perfectly coherent on these
/r/MensRights09/09/21 12:54 PM
1

Tons of perfectly legal and even publicly supported restrictions on total bodily autonomy all around the world. Minimal, or almost nonexistent legal options for violating right to life. Let that sink in. According to some, criminals on death row have a right to life but not innocent unborn babies.
/r/MensRights09/09/21 12:51 PM
1

I dont think a rapist would be given much custody or parental rights in court.
/r/MensRights09/09/21 12:43 PM
2

What if we let people unilaterally forfeit parenthood at birth? Both parents are responsible for the child until its safely able to be given away, aks until birth, then bith parents can forfeit it. If both do adoption, if only one then the other parent has full custody.
/r/MensRights09/09/21 12:42 PM
1

What about mens parenthood rights then? Legal abortion affects that
/r/MensRights09/09/21 12:39 PM
1

Gay males cant make children? Cuz many gay guys had and have wives and children.
/r/MensRights09/09/21 12:37 PM
2

A random uber driver wont be charged if he didnt know about the abortion. "Knowingly(!) aid or abet an abortion" If the woman says, imma go to PP for an abortion, he can just refuse. Woman says I am going for birth control pills, see point 1.
/r/MensRights09/09/21 12:36 PM
0

Uber will cover the legal costs. Tough shit, now the CEO can only buy 1 private jet per year instead of 2.
/r/MensRights09/09/21 12:33 PM
1

Actually at least know its equal. One of the parents dont want the child? Tough luck, the other does One of the parents want the kid? Now the other can be forced to pay chilld support. Both or neither want it? Same as usual, parenthood and adoption.
/r/MensRights09/09/21 12:32 PM
1

Yes, but in long term with white collar job you make up the difference. Not to mention, you can be a doctor in your 70's if you want to. I saw blue collar workers get tired/their body damaged by age 50. So the age old "1 size doesnt fit all" saying goes here too. I personally favor seeing people in leading/important white collar positions based on merit. Half of the population beingn discouraged to apply to university is a grave problem. But I see your point too. Just as I saw people who should …
/r/MensRights09/09/21 09:37 AM
3

Generally its true but there are men who are very smart but unsuited for physical work or desires a white collar job. Forfeiting hihger learnign because unis discriminate isnt the ideal solution. By uni course I mean real ones like medicine law engineering and not feminist dance theory of course
/r/MensRights08/09/21 01:38 PM
7

Correct
/r/MensRights08/09/21 01:22 PM
10

People don't watch male football because they are male. Or refuse watching women's teams because they are women. I assure you, if the 2 teams would have exact same skill, men, at least many of the straight ones, would watch women's football.
/r/MensRights08/09/21 09:11 AM
1

you have genetic heritage but no, legally thats not really your kid. I dont care about some post reason social construct. Biologically, I am the father. Whether some pro women anti men law system recognises this or not, I dont care. However, all it takes is a paternity test and I am a father even legally >> paying child support is mens way out of parenthood Out of parenthood meaning 0 rights and responsibilities. Like adoption. Child support is a serious responsibility. WHich is often mandated e…
/r/MensRights07/09/21 10:16 PM
1

im sorry but... its not your kid, its her kid too. I am legally his father. Biologically too. E can inherit from me technically. Consent to sex is consent to parenthood for men. So it is for women too. definitional forms for a parent Parenthood is biological fact not some social construct. you only ban safe ones, remember that. I dont want child killing to be safe. If it would be 100% lethal to get an unsafe abortion nobody would get one. Dont want to die? Dont get an unsafe abortion you dont ha…
/r/MensRights07/09/21 06:29 PM
1

The fact that she is legally able to kill my child, an act that from any other person would justify lethal defence, is what the right abuse is. Women have bodily autonomy? Great! They use this to rob men from parental rights? Problematic. Women circumcise their boys en masse. They dont care about bodily autonomy, only when it affect them. Exceptions apply. we cant force women to carry your kid just because you want one. We dont force anything. We ban killing kids. Pro life countries and laws dis…
/r/MensRights07/09/21 04:48 PM
44

The whole college admission and money spent on female education programmes, female clubs, female favouring teachers, lectures etc are already a type of affirmative action for women
/r/MensRights07/09/21 04:41 PM
1

What if it ends up being aborted? The same what happens when someone who about to inherit dies. Depends on the law system Well because those are having to do with guilting the woman into changing her mind or in the case of waiting period, make her wait until her abortion is no longer legal. Very different uses of the statement "she might change her mind". Well, if you are pro choice why would you feel guild? You just remove a clump of cells. Someone who is on the fence about abortion can just wa…
/r/MensRights07/09/21 09:42 AM
1

I know of some places, or legal systems where the if someone dies, and he has an unbord child, it will be counted as offspring. Meaning, the inheritance process is put on hold, or one part of the inheritance is witheld for an unborn child, in a way similar if the kid would be 1 day old. Fetal protection laws apply even if the woman was on her way to a PP. About to get an abortion. With 100% proof that she will get an abortion. She can always change her mind, Interestinly, in any other case a pro…
/r/MensRights07/09/21 07:46 AM
1

I see. While you are at least consistent, in reality, there are cases where unborn are treated as human beings olin law. Case we argue about, detuses can technically inherit, laws that protect pregnant women's fetuses. A doctor for example wont give thalidomide to a woman, even if she claims she will get an abortion etc
/r/MensRights07/09/21 07:20 AM
3

Assuming a woman always wants a pregnancy? Hmm, interesting... The lawmaker assumes this at killing a pregnant woman but not at any pro life law. What if she already had taken the abortion pill? Enraged, his partner kills her. But ithe pill didnt abort the child yet. Single or double murder?
/r/MensRights07/09/21 02:14 AM
2

If someone kills a woman in a Planned Parenthood, or record exists that she wanted an abortion, does it default to simple murder?
/r/MensRights07/09/21 01:35 AM
1

They together can put the kid up for adoption how hard is it to understand? You only lose rights with legal abortion and gain none. You only win rights woth banned abortion and lose none.
/r/MensRights07/09/21 01:28 AM
1

And I see the exact same. Do you see everyday people shouting their religion and people shouting their lack of religion? Because I don't
/r/MensRights06/09/21 02:53 PM
3

I know. What I am interested in, is simply: Why not supporting men rights are perfectly ok, or maybe even favoured in the case of men(seeing MRA's as sexist etc) but not supporting women's rights is seen as a travesty.
/r/MensRights06/09/21 10:22 AM
3

Read more comments. There are comments where they disagree with OP. Including me.
/r/MensRights06/09/21 10:14 AM
1

I agree with you. I hate the concept of child support (viewing fatherhood as a simple money check) but I just as hate leaving children fatherless or making the taxpayer pay for someome else's child. This is the few situation where "man up" is warranted.
/r/MensRights06/09/21 10:11 AM
1

So what are they?
/r/MensRights06/09/21 10:07 AM
3

Damn I hope you are getting well or already well. Not to absolve the jerk in any way, but I do suspect that current societal policies and laws divinding the 2 sex is somewhat responsible for these abusive relationships.
/r/MensRights06/09/21 12:42 AM
3

Eh there are idiots all around. At this point I am not surprised at all. I am kind of sad when I see women hating mwn and vice versa. All this effort used to hate the other sex could be used productively. Dont worry I am sure you will find your partner. Lots of men, imo will appreciate loving them or caring about their issues instead of hating them based on their sex. I personally think being single for some time is beneficial. I were able to focus on school much better when I was single.
/r/MensRights06/09/21 12:21 AM
1

Well then champ, lets start a movement legalising prostitution then, with added options to opt out from parenthood before the sex you paid for. You have your first supporter
/r/MensRights06/09/21 12:15 AM
4

I know but you can pay child support to a hooker you know. You can sue a business technically for bad service but I dont think a court just throws out a case just because the mother is a "princess of the night" Cue the age old "child's interest" argument and behold
/r/MensRights05/09/21 11:56 PM
8

I wish women like you gals would be more visible irl and on dating apps Inner voice: "Chill Wolf, remember no simping" Nah jk I am happy I see women with a healthy worldview
/r/MensRights05/09/21 11:54 PM
1

Wait, did you had sex for 15 years without a condom and this is your only case where a pregnancy happened to your partner?
/r/MensRights05/09/21 11:25 PM
3

Why would it matter if its legal? I do think it should be but if a condom breakes and the whore wants to get child support she can just keep the child.
/r/MensRights05/09/21 11:18 PM
-1

Congrats for being a father!
/r/MensRights05/09/21 11:13 PM
16

I am so happy women such as you exist. I am getting tired of the lot of lib/sjw/lefty woman I see I would personally like to see artificial wombs either. Not only the tech seems fascinating it may give opportunity for men to be single fathers eithout much hassle or it can be beneficial for women. This "pregnancy is oppression is bullshit". Nobody forces anyone to be pregnant.
/r/MensRights05/09/21 11:09 PM
-1

I agree with it The enforcement part is kinda icky but this is what pro aborts get if they try to block all other pro life laws. I also think this is a win for men's right
/r/AntiFeminists05/09/21 10:49 PM
22

Do you see the hashtag #killallwomen as a joke too?
/r/MensRights05/09/21 10:36 PM
33

Interesting take: while I dont agree with this, not supporting mens right is seen as perfectly ok. Why does someone not supporting women's right seen as a travesty?
/r/MensRights05/09/21 10:34 PM
1

This law changes little for men, but it eliminates one negazive outcome for men: when he wants the kid and the woman do not. In this case the woman will have to carry the child to term then simply give it to the father. Or, they can both decide to forfeit parenthood and put the kid up for adoption. Its a win for men who want to keep and raise their child.
/r/MensRights05/09/21 10:31 PM
1

Wait a minute. As far as I know, safe havens are not gender restricted. Technically, I think even a man could put a child in. But I am not sure, as I am not a lawyer. Women do pay child support if the man has custody. Its just unlikely the man has the custody. However, regarding abortion: Outside of abortion, she has the exact same choices to screw you over. If the child is born, you together can decide to put the kid up for abortion. Or she can put the child into a safe haven. The only differen…
/r/MensRights05/09/21 09:41 PM
1

Btw, outside of abortion, cant men do these too? Adoption can only happen with the other parents consent. And in theory, men can put the kid into a safe haven.
/r/MensRights05/09/21 07:41 PM
1

Well, I do have to ask. In what way, does this law affect men negatively?
/r/MensRights05/09/21 07:36 PM
11

Fuck around, find out.
/r/MensRights05/09/21 06:19 PM
3

No, but I think thats the real divide
/r/MensRights05/09/21 05:35 PM
1

I personally don't see right to parenthood as a positive right. Does society forced/mandated to actively help you practice your rights, like healthcare or education? No And this is evidence that your assessment of the law is being driven by revenge/spite I think parenthood should be legal to unilaterally be forfeited at birth. So no. You try to push this assumption so hard, but it isn't true, No one has the right to be provided with an infant When you have an unborn child, you are already a fath…
/r/MensRights05/09/21 03:43 PM
1

But no one has a positive right to a child Right to offspring or parenthood is a fundamental, negative right not a social, positive one like healthcare Rights are in quotes as I dont consider it a right, its a privilege >> No, it is wrong to force men AND it is wrong to force women. Currently the way that it is. See, CS laws, parental responsibilities etc >> I do not believe that the fetus is an individual person at the point of having a heartbeat. Sorry, I simply don't. But I do. >> Because the…
/r/MensRights05/09/21 02:11 PM
0

>> Women are not an enemy class I didn't say that. Just that their abortion "rights" harm fathers. >> Is it right to force a woman to become a parent against her will? Would that be good for the child OR for the man? Sounds like a recipe for an angry, resentful mother who'll take out her anger on either the man or the kid. Yes, it is right to force men so its right to force women. Sex is the choice, not parenthood. Its a biological fact and a legal position with rights and responsibilities. And …
/r/MensRights05/09/21 01:54 PM
0

Thats irrelevant from the POV of (purely) men's rights. As I said, abortion bans eliminate one bad choice for men, when he wants the kid but the woman isn't. So its a net win for men
/r/MensRights05/09/21 01:28 PM
2

The real divide is between family values/traditional way of life vs extreme individualism and liberal ways of life
/r/MensRights05/09/21 12:42 PM
1

Its just feminist/liberal/pro choice fearmongering. US is so far from Gilead I cannot even tell If there is a country close to Gilead it would be Afghanistan. Which the US taxpayers just funded with tons of taxpayer funded weapons. Aka, given them means of oppression, or a way to create Gilead for real >> Is some level of privilege being conveniently exploited? Imo abortion is a privilege itself, not a right, but I know many disagree with me. But yes, continuosly whining and blaming others, and …
/r/MensRights05/09/21 12:40 PM
0

This is the only case where men have minimal choice, if the girlfriend wants it too. Otherwise, men can get their child killed and also forced to pay child support in the very same legal system. Abortion bans at least eradicate one. Btw, if neither parent want parenthood they can just give up the child for adoption.
/r/MensRights05/09/21 12:34 PM
1

>> by our rights What rights do legal abortion protect for me, as a man? Hmmm? It only takes rights away from me.
/r/MensRights05/09/21 12:05 AM
-1

I love it too. There are thousands of supporters of this law. Deal with it.
/r/MensRights05/09/21 12:04 AM
1

in what way?
/r/MensRights05/09/21 12:02 AM
1

You are right OP. Unfortunately many will disagree with you here (bro choicers aka push abortion to evade child support) but you are right. Imo, men right activism should oppose abortion due to its negative effect regarding fathers rights.
/r/MensRights05/09/21 12:00 AM
1

Can someone tell me the reason of vast abortion support in the MRA movement?
/r/MensRights04/09/21 11:57 PM
8

Nobody should care about the sex of the voters. At all. In a democracy, only numbers matter. Not sex. So if 9 men and 8 women votes on one issue affecting only women, and the men vote yes, this law gets implemented. End of story. Its womens responsibility to go out and vote, make political parties etc. We are talking about Texas, the majority are conservative. Its a red state in decades. When a conservative law is democratically made noone should care who it affects. Its a democratic law. End of…
/r/MensRights04/09/21 11:53 PM
5

Pc game? Wine? Beer? Chocolate?(dark or milk but I personally love bonbons too). And spending extra private time with him, if you catch my drift ;) And last but certainly not least: quality time together. Maybe he wants to enjoy his hobby with you. Like if he likes to go to a football game maybe he appreciates you going with him? You can set up a date too. Having a caring gf is already a great gift btw.
/r/MensRights04/09/21 05:49 PM
-3

They werent forced to go to a foreign country to shoot foreign people. Mercenaries who fucked around and found out.
/r/MensRights04/09/21 01:04 PM
2

Like it or not its a scientifically correct statement. Fetuses who's sex are male are unborn men. Sex selective abortions are counted as a gender equality issue for women. In an era of trending #killallmen hastags you cannot be sue
/r/MensRights03/09/21 10:27 AM
1

I'd say ban periods. Eggs are human too. You do realise you will have wet dreams? Ban nature too. Don't want to get a vasectomy? Well that's too bad, because now there's a law that lets anyone file a lawsuit against you if they suspect you haven't gotten a vasectomy Very cool, make a law about it and make it stand.
/r/MensRights02/09/21 03:35 PM
1

Thanks.
/r/MensRights02/09/21 03:33 PM
3

It not only benefits me, it prevents the abuse of rights of a third party.
/r/MensRights02/09/21 03:16 PM
1

Minuscule percentage. Thousands more die due to abortion. Btw ban cars, it would save many lives.
/r/MensRights02/09/21 03:15 PM
1

>> Does that make sense? On one hand, you know whats the law about these. So if you marry or have sex yes you know the consequences. However. Man not paying alimony or child support does not murder anybody. So you could argue against these much easier, as they effect a third party's right much less than abortion. If I have to choose the ability to not see my child being killed but having to pay child support instead of the reverse I would like the former. Currently abortion is legal, but child s…
/r/MensRights02/09/21 03:12 PM
3

A minor wouldn't be able to enter into such legal contract probably.
/r/MensRights02/09/21 03:07 PM
2

Yeah, the 16 is kinda problematic. While it is past the age of consent in many places, entering into a contract such as this is nearly impossible as a minor.
/r/MensRights02/09/21 03:07 PM
1

You don't tell me what I do.
/r/MensRights02/09/21 03:05 PM
0

Because I want to.
/r/MensRights02/09/21 02:11 PM
-2

Not. An. Argument. Care to use minimal effort to argue your position?
/r/MensRights02/09/21 02:11 PM
21

it was kinda legit til the bullshit about child support and full anonymity. I think surrogacy and sperm donation throught the natural way should be a thing. With contract that the fucking judges do uphold ofc.
/r/MensRights02/09/21 01:46 PM
4

Agreed.
/r/MensRights02/09/21 01:08 PM
9

Dont care about downvotes. You are right. They have no arguments, they can only downvote.
/r/MensRights02/09/21 11:40 AM
-2

Fetus = unborn child. Yours sincerely, dictionary.
/r/MensRights02/09/21 11:39 AM
0

Based
/r/MensRights02/09/21 11:38 AM
0

Agreed
/r/MensRights02/09/21 11:38 AM
-7

Its not my job to care about anything I dont want to. Pro life legislation furthers men rights, while legal abortion inhibits parental rights
/r/MensRights02/09/21 11:37 AM
2

Its not the fetus attacks you, its your bdy's inability to properly cope with a natural process
/r/MensRights02/09/21 11:35 AM
2

Fetuses are alive. You dont have to be a citizen of the US to have right to life in the US.
/r/MensRights02/09/21 11:34 AM
2

You can protect others. Even if the fetus cannot defend themselves (kind of a social-darwinist take btw) a third party could. Just as you can decide to defend someone from a mugger. Even if you are not the one being mugged
/r/MensRights02/09/21 11:33 AM
1

I rather see the fundamental right to life be recognised.
/r/MensRights02/09/21 11:31 AM
4

Well, for abortion there is no such stance (yet) Even then, people could just disagree. I argue that pro life laws are more beneficial to men rights then being pro choice.
/r/MensRights02/09/21 11:28 AM
2

Cool. Nobody is forced to have sex, have a relationship or marry me or a pro life man. But nobody should be allowed to kill the innocent unborn. End of story. By using these emojies you make yourself look like a clown.
/r/MensRights02/09/21 10:50 AM
5

Again ad homs and seething. Btw, are you a woman? If I have a child with someone she is keeping him until she can forfeit parenthood to me. Simple as. No malarkey, no bullshit.
/r/MensRights02/09/21 10:45 AM
2

There are cases when social change can only be brought with curbing privileges. Before men had a right to college education, 100% of the students were men. Meaning a lesser abled men could go to college. Now men and women have to compete for jobs and scholarships. The way forward to womens rights was removing male privilege to college education. Same with parental rights today. Its removing privilege.
/r/MensRights02/09/21 10:43 AM
3

Yes, I do afraid of a potential future where my gf or wife changes her mind and kills my child legally. I do have to worry about it as it happened to many men.
/r/MensRights02/09/21 10:35 AM
1

It does. But who is this MenRights entity. An NGO with a set of stances, including abortion? Or is there someone who represent this subreddit?
/r/MensRights02/09/21 10:33 AM
7

Men still can be forced to pay when abortion is legal. This law protects men's parental rights who want the child
/r/MensRights02/09/21 10:30 AM
3

Men have so few parental rights, while women have so much privileges that the only way to give them more is to restrict some female privileges. Men are in a serious disadvantage in many areas. Until these are fixed, I just don't care about other equality issues. This law directly favors men. Men were still forced to pay CS. This law miggt lead to a future where you can forfeit parenthood right after birth unilaterally as a man or woman.
/r/MensRights02/09/21 10:29 AM
3

I advocate against abortion since I made this account. Never seen somebody so upset over baby he doesn't have I try to avoid a future where my child will be brutally killed against my consent.
/r/MensRights02/09/21 10:26 AM
6

Your feelings. You lost the argument when you defaulted to ad homs and used "have sex incel"like some blue haired sjw.
/r/MensRights02/09/21 10:20 AM
3

No woman is forced to date pro life men. Its their 100% personal choice. Unlike abortion ,that harms fetuses and men. Not being alloved to kill innocents does not make you cattle. You dont have to have sex if you are so mortally against the idea of pregnancy that a 99.9% chance of avoiding pregnancy doesnt cut it.
/r/MensRights02/09/21 10:18 AM
4

That you will have to cope. And seethe.
/r/MensRights02/09/21 10:16 AM
3

Hey, its men right movement. Fighting for men rights do take priority for me over fighting for womens rights. Women are already equal to men. Women have numerous privileges when talking about parental rights. The only way to make men more equal is to curb back on female parental privileges. Stop caring about female BA. Start caring about men's parental rights. Religious men can circumcise themselves the very first point they can make an informed choice about bodily mutilation: age 18.
/r/MensRights02/09/21 10:14 AM
6

I will. And if she wants an abortion, I will block it. Seethe and cope.
/r/MensRights02/09/21 10:11 AM
4

It is a men rights issue. Legal abortion violates unborn men's right to life, and born men's parental right. One of the core reasons I am pro life is due to men rights.
/r/MensRights02/09/21 10:10 AM
4

No, but I still wold want my child. Meaning I can say, ok we are done I am taking the child. Vs Ok we are done and I can spend the rest of my life mourning my child
/r/MensRights02/09/21 10:09 AM
9

Your wife can change her mind any time and get an abortion. I am not talking about a case when you get some escort pregnant, even a woman who promised to keep it can change her mind on a whim. Well, no longer in Texas.
/r/MensRights02/09/21 10:05 AM
2

Dont care. I care about men's parental rights.
/r/MensRights02/09/21 10:00 AM
4

It isnt an integral part. Just there are many misguided bro choicers who think that their way to avoid child support is abortion. While it 100% not their choice anyway when its legal. A woman when abortion legal just can kill your wanted child, but also forces you to pay 18 yearsbof child support.
/r/MensRights02/09/21 09:59 AM
-1

Circumcision bans does not violate someone's rights. Abortions do violate men's right to life and right to parenthood.
/r/MensRights02/09/21 09:58 AM
-9

Wrong. Abortion bans protect paternal right of fathers and also protect unborn men. This is a good law for men's rights. We don't have any responsibility to fight for women's rights. Women rights activist do nothing to protect men rights. Please don't support laws that let my partner kill my child.
/r/MensRights02/09/21 09:54 AM
-3

You can have parental rights prior to birth. What blocks this? Especially a right to protect your offspring? But it is the lesser evil than having to carry an unwanted pregnancy because your partner says so. Wrong. Your child being killed is one of the worst that can happen to a parent. Lifelong suffering. Compared to 9 months comfortable pregnancy in a first world country. It protects the right of an unborn fetus at the cost of the rights of an adult woman and the quality of life of everyone. W…
/r/MensRights02/09/21 02:11 AM
0

>> Ok technically it is but it's not progress towards equal rights. I dont want men granted autonomy over their partners body that is far from equality. It is progress towards equal parental rights where both parents can veto if the other partner would rob him/her from parental rights. Men doesnt suddenly own women's bodies in Texas from now on. Its the fetuses right to life prevailed over the "right" to get an abortion, not men's "right" to autonomy over someone else's body. >> Preventing that …
/r/MensRights02/09/21 12:55 AM
2

In what way?
/r/MensRights02/09/21 12:38 AM
2

This is a win for fathers in Texas. Now they can block their partner from killing their child. Parents can still put the kid up for adoption together, if they don't want to be parents.
/r/MensRights02/09/21 12:38 AM
0

> It's not progress for mens rights to essentially make abortion illegal. It is. Nobody can kill your child, not even your partner.
/r/MensRights02/09/21 12:36 AM
3

Texan fathers are protected from having to suffer their children being killed. Great law.
/r/MensRights02/09/21 12:35 AM
2

Society is not holistically comprised of elites, feminists, media and some woman. They might be a minority, but they wield immense power. Its almost the tyranny of a small minority as current system goes. And you responded that you’re beaten by societal enforcement of workplace and family laws….. that encourage women’s participation in rat race type responsibilities... I mentioned my experience not necesarily respoded to OP's POV. But the current system do causes this rat race OP mentioned. Like…
/r/MensRights01/09/21 12:11 PM
5

> Who in society is beating you? Elites, feminists, media, even many women for example? > And how are they beating you? Unfair laws, Workplace, legal discrimination in many areas especially family law. Hateful language towards men.
/r/MensRights31/08/21 11:11 PM
11

>>I checked out of the greater civilization a good two decades ago If it doesnt bother you if I ask, how? Do you live in the woods. Or just some chill suburb? Do you live alone for 20 years? No loneliness, homesickness etc? I'd like to hear this story about your life.
/r/MensRights31/08/21 11:03 PM
1

Kinda like monk mode? I think its a legit option. But its better to think about if you really want this and not just the effect of soceity/pessimism/black pill etc. If you like the company of others I think you are able to find normal friends who don't freind you for money. Poor people have friends too. And while its less ideal I think a FWB is better than no gf (obv much worse than a real love-based relationship). Also the benefit of this life choice that you can save up a lot or scale back wor…
/r/MensRights31/08/21 11:01 PM
-1

I am not saying they should be treated by robots. I just wanted to point out that for some people its hard to understand pther people see or process the world differently. People who see the world through emotions, often struggle to see point of views from people who see the world through logic. But as every personality is different, one size doesnt fit all.
/r/MensRights31/08/21 12:08 AM
3

Simply put, forget everything the media, society etc taught you about men. Now, simply treat other man as human beings with feelings. Little difference compared to women is that most men like being treated as a masculine man, and most of them use logic instead of emotions to go throught life. And even this is a generalisation.
/r/MensRights30/08/21 11:20 PM
1

Men are less likely to wear masks because men are more against authority then women.
/r/MensRights27/08/21 10:13 PM
13

I dont give out private info on the internet. No they dont. Current laws in western countries does not give full authority to parents regarding bodily integrity. Like female genital mutilation is banned regardless of the parents beliefs.
/r/MensRights13/08/21 11:52 PM
9

So parents have full authority over the child's bodily integrity and autonomy?
/r/MensRights13/08/21 11:41 PM
3

I dont think you should try to supress your very valid feelings. For mental health advice (I am not a mental health professional mind you): Getting off social media, excercise, wrining down your thoughts, talk about this w someone you trust, creative work (making music, art, sculpting etc) Personally I would cut these toxic ppl out of your life. They hate or virtue signal hate for an immutable characteristic of yours. But like dropping racial slurs if you are black or mocking your religion. I do…
/r/MensRights13/08/21 11:17 PM
15

Uh why should the parents choice for a third party's body? If someone wants a mutilated dick he can get one at age 18.
/r/MensRights13/08/21 11:10 PM
1

If she went home send her a message like " Are you ok? Did you arrive home safe Had fun? etc" It estwbilishes you as a protector kinda figure, also seems that you are a caring (even romatic) kinda guy. Some chicks dig that. Also it may (or may not) be used later if the response to it was positive. Like "Yeah I had fun. Thank you for the night "etc
/r/MensRights13/08/21 11:08 PM
6

I think its a real problem that they fucked up marriage. Today its mot only not good for men its also discouraged. Alsocthe fact that many jurisdictions try to force relationships, longer flings etc into a common law marriage is also suspect. Back then marriage was a very beneficial social invention from which both men and women benefitted. Akmost everybody were married. For good reason. When feminist destroyed it, they "forgot" to give a viable alternative
/r/MensRights13/08/21 01:47 PM
2

Yes, and that is true for 1v1 situations against an attacker, where the male body advantage mostly begins to manifest at age 12 or 14. At age 7, against a German Shepherd.... hardly any advantage. Its also important to mention that in street fight scenarios, the element of surprise, or using tools for self defense(guns, stick, spray, or even a key!) can give you an edge, and these techniques and tools can be used effectively by both men and women. Therefore if an attacker assaults a couple, I ex…
/r/MensRights08/08/21 11:21 AM
2

Dude he is right in this argument. Nobody debates that people generally should help and even endanger themselves for their relatives. I expect the same from the sister as well. However, this mindset can be quite damaging if society expects the same for random stranger women. On many YT videos when someone (generally a woman) is being attacked by the criminal and nobody helps, many comments say "Wow those who just stand their are not real men!" etc. No word about women who stand there.
/r/MensRights06/08/21 11:01 PM
2

I know. Kinda sad.
/r/MensRights06/08/21 10:57 PM
6

> This situation is not a 7yr old boy vs 7yr old girl. He literally saved his younger sister. And he is applauded for that. > Now that should be the case with anyone. Everyone should put their life in front of others to protect them. I dont wanna be cynical bc I kinda agree with the concept in theory, but do you dress up as a superhero to fight crime at night? This problem also quickly turns into a "free rider" problem, where people who do not risk themselves but get protection do benefit compar…
/r/MensRights06/08/21 10:56 PM
5

Cointoss. A 7 year old boy has negligible if any advantage in a fight against a 60 kg rabid German Shepherd dog compared to a 7 yr old girl. In your opinion, should the little boy? Why?
/r/MensRights06/08/21 05:05 PM
0

Running after some kidnapper vs fighting a vicious dog. Sure, its exactly the same level of sacrifice/danger. "Thousands of other stories" Where?
/r/MensRights06/08/21 12:21 PM
17

Are women held to the same standards? When will I see a similar post with the sexes reversed? Fyi, an 7 yr old boy has the same chances against a vicious dog as a 7 yr old girl: close to none.
/r/MensRights06/08/21 12:13 PM
1

> all the time Sure buddy. >Plea bargains wouldn’t exist if they didn’t. Why would someone take them if they are innocent? > Innocent people get convicted all the time. Plea bargains wouldn’t exist if they didn’t. Also, there are two types of people in his jails-actually three-the unjustly imprisoned, the convicted, and those who either couldn’t afford bail or were denied it. First case is a miscarriage of justice. Second is justified. Third is a necessity because bail is implemented to ensure t…
/r/MensRights02/08/21 04:48 PM
1

They arent easy to broke either. If you live in a blue state, chances are you are a liberal who dont want to carry guns anyway. Or you are aware of the unconstitutional restrictions. If you live in a red state the gun laws are more lax. And you have to educate yourself where you cannot bring your guns. As you are aware gun rights are under attack. Where you cant bring it? Schools and post offices? Thats it basically. And if you conceal carry how do you get caught in the first place? Also you won…
/r/MensRights31/07/21 12:08 PM
0

Full of? No. Enough? Yes Untrue. Carrying a firearm in certain buildings. Like which buildings? Whats the charge? Thank the anti-freedom politicans. Shall not be infringed. You should be able to carry guns anywhere, its literally in the country's founding document. Citing blatantly unconstitutional laws is a bad example. Even then I dont think you can accidentally break them as you are probably aware which buildings guns is banned from if you want to open carry, also I dont think its an instant …
/r/MensRights31/07/21 11:26 AM
0

Yeah sure. The prison is full of people who "accidentally" broke laws. Can you list some "accidentally breakable" laws that are enforced, carry jail term, and means instant jail first term for first time offenders with a clean record?
/r/MensRights30/07/21 10:58 PM
0

Very few laws carry jail term AND you can accidentally broke them So yes, I did not broke any. At least any which would be a felony because then I would be in jail. I never even got a ticket in my life so I guess I am doing pretty good.
/r/MensRights30/07/21 09:36 PM
1

> It's people like you who give this subreddit a bad rap. Oh noes, the subreddit most of reddit already considers a controversial "hate" subreddit gets bad rap from a guy tough on crime. Sure buddy. > Your obsession with being "tough" is rather cringeworthy. I am tough on crime, not tough in general. When does the "its toxic masculinity" argument comes? > And writing "Jebus" is not going to convince anyone of your argument. So? Christians with true faith can stomach criticism. Its obviously a sa…
/r/MensRights30/07/21 06:37 PM
-1

They dont have space for them because taxpayers dont wanna spend money on prisons. If there is a stupid law change or delete it. There are differences between violwnt felonies and not following a law that bans non missionary sex. Its ridicolous to compare the 2. In fact, even if non missionary sex would carry a jail term these people wouldnt be put with violent scum. You don't really know if you have broken a law or not that would include jail time because you don't know all the laws. I do becau…
/r/MensRights30/07/21 05:42 PM
1

Then its the justice systems "sentence" part is problematic, not the punishment itself. Not missionary sex= irrelevant, its not enforced because it does not effect anyone else. Noone will be jailed for doggystyle. I never drank a single drop of alcohol before driving. Any time I drank I took a taxi or uber or bus etc. There are no examples. I never broke a single law and if I accidentally did I would probably get a fine. I 100% never broke a law that would be punished with jail time. Liberals ar…
/r/MensRights30/07/21 04:39 PM
7

Many shitty man are from single parent households, guess the sex of the parent in the vast majority of these households?
/r/MensRights30/07/21 02:46 PM
0

Why? Mr. Arpaio showed there are dire consequences for your actions if you are scum. Interestingly people who did not committed crimes were not in prison, interesting isnt it?
/r/MensRights30/07/21 02:43 PM
4

This will be ultimately a win for men. Either women will be drafted so you have 50%less chance to be drafted, or they will abolish the draft. If the latter happens, the benefits are obvious, if the former, then not even the housewives, trad women with children get drafted, the childless feminists and the wannabe amazons can show their worth on the battlefield. Its time to invest in a popcorn company boys.
/r/MensRights30/07/21 02:41 PM
1

Why? Its time for women to show that they are just as capable as men on the battlefield. Time to protect your loved ones, your fellow men.
/r/MensRights24/07/21 09:19 PM
1

This will help it be deleted. With this step the supporters of full abolish will rise about 30-40%
/r/MensRights23/07/21 04:50 PM
1

True, but in a family I think its beneficial if someoen takes care about the children and the other person works. back then a family could be supported on one salary, today, not so much.
/r/MensRights09/07/21 06:22 PM
1

Noone said only women could be stay at home parents. Having the ability to do something, and being totally conditioned by society to make that choice is rather different. Not to mention, today 2 parents have to work for the same QOL that a single parent could provide before. Puahing women to work also comes with the effect that women who want to stay at home are increasingly ostracised. This affects women who want to stay at home.
/r/MensRights09/07/21 02:51 PM
1

Men sue in some cases already and they won. Still does not solve tge problem of lack of men only places, it just erases women only ones.
/r/MensRights09/07/21 02:48 PM
1

Yes, but what about the fact that the elites strongly support women to work instead of having children or a family? More workers, a win. Less wages, a win. Less children to spend money on instead of giving it to a corporation, win. Longterm its unsustainable but most leaders dont care about longterm. Having an ability to do it vs being bombarded all day on every fron NOT to choose the traditional lifestyle is rather different.
/r/MensRights09/07/21 11:46 AM
1

Because every time someone wants to open one, feminists freak out. Or the gym owner dont want to deal with the repercussions. Or men are conditioned to accept women into their places therefore the amount of men who want to excercise alone isnt enough to open a male only gym. And again, any gym owner that opens up a sex restricted gym he or she risks discrimination lawsuits.
/r/MensRights09/07/21 11:32 AM
2

From one POV women only gyms would be feasible if we base the argument on private business rights etc. However, in todays world its utterly unfeasiblr for men to have their own men only place therefore its a moot point for the MRA movement.
/r/MensRights09/07/21 02:15 AM
1

I heard about it but it does not justify discrimination. I find it unlikely someone kills you in the middle of a gym for saying no tho. No, you dont have to spend a minute. You can say no. It takes 1 second. People who harass other gymgoers should be reported to staff. Well that would make a very segregated so society, with everybody in his or her own bubble. Disrimination laws and precedent of the last 70 years would have to be deleted tho. Alas, right now white men are the only group that cann…
/r/MensRights09/07/21 12:56 AM
1

You dont ban muslims, you just offer people who are afraid of islam a place to work out. If you cannot enter into a public business its discrimination. Some people actually won discrimination lawsuits against these places. By the letter of the law these segregating places violate discriminatiok laws.
/r/MensRights09/07/21 12:18 AM
3

So report the harassers to staff? Loss of revenue doesnt justify discrimination. Would a bakery that refuses all muslims be allowed to operate? It might be a successful business if there are enough people who hate/fear muslims. The owner could argue that opening up the business to muslims could make the business lose revenue.
/r/MensRights09/07/21 12:10 AM
2

But why should normal men be discriminated against because of people who use the gym as a pick up place? "Escaping" from them doesnt solve the core problem. They will do it again in another place. Meanwhile calling them out or if they do it regularly, reporting them to staff has a positive effect.
/r/MensRights09/07/21 12:07 AM
2

Thats the whole point. Anybody should be free to enter into a gym they paid for regardless of sex or gender. Womens only gym shouldnt exist. I assure you, if they have to let in a 6 ft 200 pound bearded muscular guy in the women only part of the gym then they have to let in LGBTQ folk too. There are 2 types of public places: intimate and non-intimate. While the debate about toilets or dressing rooms go on due to different beliefs, a gym isnt an intimate olace therefore no sex or gender based dis…
/r/MensRights08/07/21 11:56 PM
3

Is it hard to say no? Just bc someone hit on you unwanted does not mean a whole sex should be discriminated against.
/r/MensRights08/07/21 11:50 PM
1

Why would an entire sex be banned from a public place because of some bad apples?
/r/MensRights08/07/21 11:48 PM
3

Yes, but in many cases men are locked out based on time. Also its an ideological problem, I dont want to be excluded from a place because of my sex, idc if I can find another machine or not. Thats it. A gym isnt even an intimate place so it shouldnt be segregated.
/r/MensRights08/07/21 05:43 PM
8

Why is that? Why cant someone recognise as a woman for 1 minute? Isnt the whole argument behind gender is that you decide? I can recognise as a woman for 1 week than male as another. How do you incorporate nonbinary people? There is and was sex based discrimination. Then sex was basically replaced gender. Now you are a woman if you recognise as one. Curious, how do you decide if someone is genuine in their self-identifying? When a feminine bio male recognises as a woman its legit, when a 200 pou…
/r/MensRights08/07/21 02:34 PM
3

Thats only a problem if you use it for unethical means.
/r/MensRights08/07/21 02:25 PM
8

Are you transphobic? Why are you the one who decides if someone is a woman or not? Remember, in 2021 if you say you are a woman you are a woman and everybody has to accept that. Geez, keep your 2015 morals for yourself.
/r/MensRights08/07/21 12:35 PM
5

I know, same with toilets. However, I dont intend to harass women but I dont aprove discrimination. I recommend taking a reasonable approach and use this to combat discrimination not for aelfish purposes.
/r/MensRights08/07/21 12:34 PM
12

Because menmen doesnt do anything to combat this. Standard approach: Protest, go into the gym at women hours, write for the owner of the gym, talk on social media about it. Walk in the gym and say that you are a customer and wont allow being discriminated. Smart approach: identify as a woman. Get 2 friends as witnesses. Identify as a women and tell that if they dont let you in you sue. Then sue. Either they have to let you in or you get paid after a court inevitable gives you the win for for dis…
/r/MensRights08/07/21 10:40 AM
3

About 50% of men and women called themselves pro life on a Gallup poll. There isnt a sec based di ide. There is a politics based divide.
/r/MensRights08/07/21 10:32 AM
5

I think we have it wrong. We allow women to abort and by proxy men to pressure their partner into an abortion. But we dont allow either partner to forfeit parenthood. It should work the other way. Abortion banned, but both parents can unilaterally decide, up to birth, to act a parent or not. Paternity tests are mandatory and if the father is the bio father he is listed on if he wants to act as a father. Same with women. If you accepted parenthood however you are responsible for your child up to …
/r/MensRights08/07/21 10:30 AM
1

Ehh. Some fiery doc chick would have given you her number and stayed.
/r/MensRights04/07/21 09:15 PM
27

Based answer, what was her response?
/r/MensRights04/07/21 03:54 PM
1

What you should say? Goodbye
/r/MensRights02/07/21 08:10 PM
3

I am glad, try to educate yourself from as many sources as possible.
/r/MensRights29/06/21 03:00 PM
2

I am sorry you have to go through this. There is something to consider. There are 3.5 billion women on Earth. You are a successful young man who also care for others wellbeing. Wasting it on one girl who squanders it robs another, more deserving woman from your attention and quality time. Personally for me, aborting my child would be an unforgivable sin. If someone is capable of murdering your wanted (and agreed upon) child she wouldnt care about your wellbeing either. Also these self issues sho…
/r/MensRights29/06/21 02:48 PM
2

Well thats quite a radical but interesting idea tho how stufd like divorces are gonna work? Sleep well btw
/r/MensRights28/06/21 09:38 AM
2

Why arent they people? Every group of human beings on Earth should be persons. Many groups were restricted from personhood throughout history, they all gained it eventually. So maybe the US should copy the Polish policy on child support? Failure to pay CS has consequences in almost all countries.
/r/MensRights28/06/21 09:32 AM
1

I gladly give more power to the government if its used to protect lives. A judge with medical experts can decide if it was an abortion or not. If it cannot be proved, you go free. Again, not all laws punish women who get abortions. Some punish the doctor only. Abortion bans does not have the effects as you say in PL countries. Just because someone does not work in the 30's does not mean it cannot work 90 years later. The world has changed. It would be super easy to report an illegal abortion cen…
/r/MensRights28/06/21 09:23 AM
2

There is nothing that stops CS system from being revamped. CS itself isnt even the problem because in times its justified. The problem is that not paying in is treated as a crime instead of debt.
/r/MensRights28/06/21 09:20 AM
1

If there is a problem with due process in America why not fix it? How do a prosecutor prove beyond reasonable doubt that a miscarriage is an abortion? You are judged by 12 of your peers on the US arent you? The child support system will be revamped the second the revamp child support cause gains traction. Again, not an abortion related problem. In Europe you still can get to jail over unpaid child support. We simply have a nuanced approach and fix the amount at a percentage of pay, and take onto…
/r/MensRights28/06/21 08:30 AM
1

Huh? Many women trap men for child support? Or decide to keep the child.
/r/MensRights28/06/21 08:25 AM
1

Fetuses should be people. They are just yet another group of humans who did not get personhood yet. No, stupid child support laws put men into prison not abortion laws. How many Polish men are in prison due to PL laws?
/r/MensRights28/06/21 08:24 AM
2

Makong abortion illegal wont put fathers in jail. Lol I dont get the logic. Abortions encroach the right of a 3rd party, the fetus. And in some cases the man who wants to be a parent. Thus since it affects more humans that the woman, its a public issue. You do realise in many cases wheter abortion should be legal was decided in the voting booths? On referendums?
/r/MensRights28/06/21 07:39 AM
1

You are still at the mercy of the mothers whim. Idiotic child support laws are a separate issue.
/r/MensRights28/06/21 07:36 AM
2

I see. Lets agree to disagree then. However, let me correct 2 premise. Men wont be put into prison more. The whole child support system needs to be revisited on the western world and remove debtors prison for people who cannot pay it. Ots one of the only cases when you go to prison for not being able to pay money. But revision of these policoes need to happen regardless of abortion. And no, women wont get to jail for miscarriages. Due process right. The state prosecutor would have to prove beyon…
/r/MensRights28/06/21 07:35 AM
1

Balanced take but I think we have it backwards. We allow women and by proxy, men, (think about pressuring into abortion, "why not abort" stance of society in many cases) to opt out of parenthood by killing fetuses but then force both parents to act as a parent if one of them wants to keep the child. It should be the other way aka abortion banned but unilateral opt out from parenthood at birth.
/r/MensRights28/06/21 12:23 AM
0

Factually wrong. A fetus is a living human being. Wasnt the "human life begins at conception" part of biology missed by your school?
/r/MensRights28/06/21 12:20 AM
0

Then why do women want to take agency over the childs body? You really compare men who kill over their sorrow over their child being killed woth people who kill themselves over a pathological sense of love or a hormonal change? The latter 2 sorrows you can cure by mental health support. You cannot resurrect someones child who was murdered. Why do you support a made up right to abortion by some radical feminists over mens parental rights? Feminists never support mens rights and never will. I told…
/r/MensRights28/06/21 12:17 AM
0

And? They are living human beings. "We are expecting a child, he is a boy!" - says the couple with their unborn child. So?
/r/MensRights28/06/21 12:09 AM
2

Well it was a very interesting POV but I am not entitely sure being cut is what avoided HIV. Anyway its never a thing to gamble with and I probably would never risk it. The law part was a good change but that charges were dropped bc le big anime women eyes makes me furious. That bitch could have killed you, maybe she infected many men. Whoever thought not requiring to disclose HIV should be law was an evil person. Glad to see most countries are not idiots on this issue. I am not American either …
/r/MensRights27/06/21 01:12 AM
4

Well I knew that it wont prevent it I was just curious what the OC intended with that part. Tha nk you for doing the research.
/r/MensRights27/06/21 12:35 AM
1

Interesting read, tho in the case of HIV smaller chance doesnt cut it imo. I certainly wont rush to get circumcised. Btw if you dont mind if I ask: Was that person aware of the HIV infection or not? Cuz some laws were made that seem to stop requesting informing the partner about HIV status which I feel is very dangerous law.
/r/MensRights26/06/21 09:46 PM
8

Curious, how does being cut effect getting/not getting HIV?
/r/MensRights26/06/21 07:05 PM
-1

And why dont you support unborn men's and women's bodily autonomy then? What about all those fathers who see their unborn child as their child? Just because the woman does not want that pregnancy the fetus does not stop being a human. Your pro choice stance actively harms men who feel sorrow over their lost child, some even committed suicide. Until abortion is legal and women have 100% choice wheter to murder or keep the unborn child, the status quo wont matter. Men will be forced to pay child s…
/r/MensRights26/06/21 01:18 PM
-3

Yes, I do get to enforce my views trouugh legislation and police. In a democracy I can vote for a pro life party I can run as a party leader etc. And then I force my views on the rest like all laws do. Child support is a separate issue. It needs serious reform, but legal abortion wont solve this since women can just not get an abortion and still force men to pay. Therefore its only women who can choose now. Meanwhile many men suffer due to their wanted unborn babies are being killed. Why dont yo…
/r/MensRights26/06/21 08:36 AM
1

No, it should be banned.
/r/MensRights25/06/21 07:50 PM
1

I support both laws. These laws will benefit men in tje long run. The prenatal child support seems bad but it will allow more insight from men. The latter is great. No women should be able to kill a child the man wants.
/r/MensRights25/06/21 07:48 PM
1

Its not the womans body how many times it has to be said? Its the childs body. Why do you support the right of women to murder your and other men's child?
/r/MensRights25/06/21 07:46 PM
5

Wrong. Women kill children, men just refuse to support them. Death is way worse than poverty. Personally, I dont see why the men rights movement should support abortion. Feminists(who are 99% pro choice) never give an inch to men. Neither should we, and attack every single place of inequality, including abortion. No women should be able to kill a mans child if he wants to be a parent., we should let people forfeit parenthood unilaterally (at birth, many couples want to adopt btw). Then the child…
/r/MensRights25/06/21 07:37 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter