TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Chaskar Archive

View 1 post and 108 comments by Chaskar on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
64

DiscussionChaskar/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/24 11:09 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

I mean, 1 percent is pretty good if you gave no fucks and approached 5 times a day any woman you want to approach. Of course this calculation only works if it can't backfire.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/24 03:53 PM
–

Which is same the reason used to invade Ukraine in the first place. Fear of what would happen when they join NATO. Keep in mind, no one knows if russia will invade again and we are continually wasting life just to keep them tied up. There are other ways to reduce the likelihood of further russian attack that don't involve indefinite human sacrifice.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/24 03:29 PM
–

Sounds very warmongering tbh.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/24 11:01 AM
1

as simple as that It's never simple as that, nothing is, let's not get arrogant.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 08:53 PM
11

It was a special kindergarten for very special kids
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 08:46 PM
1

I think there is a case to be made that women are less opportunistic. If they were equally as opportunistic then women would cheat at rates much much higher than men, since it is obvious to anyone in this sub that they have more opportunities. Cheating rates appear to be more or less similar, certainly not orders of magnitude different. Of course this depends on the definition of opportunistic. I would define it as such: If we define a quality value q for any opportunity, then the probability fu…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 08:42 PM
4

I believe there have been hints at peace since a few months after the war started, when Putin had to face the fact that he wasn't getting Ukraine as easily as he thought. There's a reason Trump claims he'll solve the war on day one. Imagine how many lives would've been saved if only they'd agreed two years ago, after the stalemate-esk situatio started. They won't lose the war, neither side will. Why are they still fighting?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 08:33 PM
11

(Repost because I didn't use np.reddit.com earlier and it got deleted) I actually researched this for a response in the past. This is incorrect according to all the research I saw, there is evidence. The ratio is obviously not as high as the diagnosis ratio, but there is still a difference by sex of varying size depending on the source. The biggest meta study I saw found a 3.25 to 1 ratio true ratio compared to the 4.2 to 1 diagnosis ratio. The citations are in the line of comments leading to on…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/24 08:55 PM
1

Yea I agree, certainly enough to disprove the lunatics but honestly, I don't think they'll even care haha
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/24 06:15 PM
1

Yea that's what I figured, but such low n makes it pretty pointless imo, after all if even a 3-fold drop happens within error margins how can you ever make a serious case that the data supports any conclusion regarding the development over time. With that big a margin you could make a wide variety of outlandish claims and point out that it's within the margin of error. The n ain't big enough to be useful for any serious analysis.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/24 02:20 PM
2

Focusing on any criteria other than how they act and you feel around them probably has that effect to some extend certainly. Applies to a lot of areas (i.e. hiring) imo
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/24 08:10 PM
1

I remember a Japanese (?) culture where they don't consider someone an adult until they're like 60, crazy! 100% on your depression take
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/24 08:08 PM
2

To add another anecdote on, the only girl I've known to date older men (and in her case I'm talking OOOOOLDER men), and a lot of them, was "littered" with mental health conditions from BPD to OCD. My time in the clinic sure was interesting haha
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/24 08:05 PM
1

Heard that working at star bucks as a guy is an effective option if you're into dating coworkers haha
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/24 07:57 PM
5

I got to see him a couple months after we got exclusive Wait, he didn't even show you a picture all that time? Crazy! He be playing the mystery game pretty well, damn haha
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/24 07:55 PM
2

But surely that swing is WAY to big. We also aren't measuring opinions like in an election poll, which are bound to be very instable. The 2008 drop is literally an anomaly of bigger significance than COVID and just pure coincidence is practically impossible unless their n is much too small. Are you sure they aren't mentioning anything in the paper?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/24 07:44 PM
1

The massive variance of the data is making me suspicious of its accuracy. How in the world can a 3-fold drop followed by a 3-fold increase be explained from 2006 to 2010. Does anyone know if other independent sources also report such numbers?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/24 07:36 PM
2

Out of general interest, what are those suggestions usually?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/24 07:32 PM
4

Does it really? that's very interesting. From my understanding autism and BPD in males is about as far from each other as can be, given I knew some BPD males from my clinic time and everyone knows the cultural image of autistic males. Surprising that it presents THAT differently in women.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/24 09:14 PM
1

Wait wait wait, that sounds like you seem to argue that if those individuals weren't affected by the culture, then it would be equal. That may well be, I don't know, I suppose no one truly does (I mean how could someone? Not like there's any experiment you could reasonably perform without violating A LOT of human right laws haha), but it is entirely orthogonal to what I was attempting to argue, which is that there are differences between the sexes in western cultures. And I think you agree would…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/24 09:01 PM
1

Wait, do you think that in the US or Germany if you were to proposition a random man and a random woman for casual sex that they are equally likely to agree? Because I'd highly disagree
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/24 02:38 PM
1

Ah, yes, thank you. I'm a mathematician at heart so using correct language is important to me also haha
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/24 01:43 PM
0

I will only comment on the last part for time reasons: There are some women (that I know personally, and probably more than that) who severely want a relationship basically just to have one and will (and has) accept dates and more from basically almost any man that is offering them. There is an equivalent, at least to some extend. It's as unhealthy as men wanting sex for confirmation (? That's not the word I think but I can't seem to come up with it??), but it does exist.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/24 01:41 PM
1

I think I understand what you mean and I appreciate it. I see the danger you mean, thank you for reminding. Some situations absolutely cannot be recreated by means of analogy and believing it can may lead one to dismiss very real feelings that you yourself just can't recreate or put to much weight on solutions which work in the analogy, but turn out not to translate well over. As a matter of fact the longer I think about it, the less I believe this tool to actually be useful, rather than a dange…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/24 01:29 PM
2

I will make it as a stand-up one day, just you wait!!
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/24 12:55 PM
1

No where have I implied that it wouldn't be different in a different culturey that's the beauty of the argument. We don't need to make any statesments as to where those differences come from, they're absolutely irrelevant. If you wanns be a hardcore biologist or fully constructionist, the end result is the same when it comes to the thoughts and emotions people feel in general in the culture we are discussing! And in the culture I, and probably most people here, live within, the bottle neck is wo…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/24 12:53 PM
2

Imo that's the best mindset for sure! It's always a bit tricky to not let ones doubts creep up, but if you can employ it so successfully, congrats!
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/24 12:48 PM
4

Of all the valid points you could have picked you decided to imply they're defending child molesters?! Why!? This doesn't help our case! This is silly! For all you know he's a bigger anti-child molester than you are! Alright that all was in jest, but seriously, let's stay on point ;)
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/24 02:05 AM
2

Right, that's entirely possible, although I do personally believe that at least in principle those differences cannot be entirely cultural. At least a teeny tiny portion must be biological, even if it is entirely dismissable in the grand scheme of things. The reason is that otherwise all biological differences effecting the brain would have to magically cancel out fully. Keep in mind, this is just a mathematical argument that I maintain for my nerdiness, it is entirely orthogonal to the point.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/24 02:01 AM
1

But that wasn't the point, the point was that differences evidently exist that lead can to general trends when analyzing the thoughts, feelings and emotional reactions of those groups. They don't have to be fundamental for that! As a matter of fact the negation of my claim would be that any observed trend in thoughts, feelings and emotional reactions ARE merely fundamental rather than cultural.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/24 01:46 AM
8

They sure as shit ain't no bottleneck, they the bottle in the neck if you know what I mean haha neck as in throat and bottle... as... in... god that was terrible
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/24 01:31 AM
2

Yes, but do you understand in what way it is... because it is not because of libidos.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/24 01:11 AM
7

Thank you, and do let me know what their thoughts are when you do! it's always interesting to hear from people who aren't in this "pill culture" about such concepts :)
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/24 01:07 AM
3

I did it, just for you, there you go https://www.zippia.com/knitter-jobs/demographics/ https://en.chessbase.com/post/what-gender-gap-in-chess https://www.statista.com/statistics/1134065/share-soccer-fans-gender/ although the fact that there are differences in hobbies you surely must've believed before this, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/24 01:05 AM
2

Wait are you asking for me to bring you numbers on there being differences in hobby choices between men and women?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/24 12:59 AM
3

That's the point, try to read it without assuming things that I haven't said. I always find when I step back and read something from someone I deem as of "the opposite camp" in a way where I only assume things they themselves have said, that what they're saying is a lot more agreeable.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/24 12:47 AM
3

I absolutely agree! It's why I would attempt to dismiss those thoughts if I were in a situation like above, but it's still a sorta gut reaction of the inner critic, comparison.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/24 12:43 AM
14

Absolutely, which is why I always had a problem with the saying. But surely you agree that the bottleneck for casual sex is in general with women, rather than men. It's not a misandrist lie that a lot more men would enjoy being propositioned for casual sex than women. Its just a claim of fact*, the claim itself can't be misogynist or misandrist. *claim of fact in this case referring to the way it's made, rather than its truth value. Although I do believe it to be true.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/24 12:40 AM
5

A lot of commenters do and I highly doubt that you'd perfectly understand general male reaction in every situation.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/24 12:36 AM
–

It's suspected 4:3 by a study looking at clinical cases and inferring the real rate. Compare this to a META STUDY compiling 20 studies that followed that evaluated for autism in the study, rather than relying on previous diagnosis to account for underdiagnosis! I literally picked the first link I found and it's a more robust result than the one you presented, after you have apparently researched the topic so much (Perhaps you looked until you found a single study that agreed with you?). BTW the …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/24 12:32 AM
5

Lol you're just trying to be nasty haha
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/24 12:18 AM
–

Yes it IS underdiagnosed! That's what my comment implied! And it does present differently which is why it is underdiagnosed! No one disagrees here! But it's still quite the claim to make that autism presents at equal rates. That does NOT follow from the other facts. As a matter of fact, from your own source """ I do believe that males are more susceptible to ASD than females, but I think we exaggerate the extent of this gender difference, especially amongst people with normal-range IQ and fluent…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/24 12:15 AM
8

I think you misunderstand what this post is about, I'm proposing an analogy a person can use to possibly arrive at similar feelings the opposite sex might feel in a situation that one has a hard time understanding another persons feelings. You don't lie to anyone, you're just picturing a different situation than just flipping the sexes and picturing that.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/24 12:01 AM
7

They're still capable of being lonely long term Yes, of course! I think you're attributing all red pill concepts to my view while I really only believe a handful of them and certainly to a lesser extend than the redpill (i.e. general trends vs all women, all men idiocy). I excuse the claim that the differences have lead to cultural norms, that can clearly be debated and proof is of course very hard to come by (or even imagine what it could look like. Can't really do any tests can you, best not t…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/24 11:51 PM
8

Please be more concrete, this is suppose to be an analogy, not a theory. It is indeed inaccurate, but that doesn't mean it's not useful in some circumstances.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/24 11:36 PM
5

Do you think most single men would take negatively to being propositioned by an average gal for a fwb situation? Also, minor, very much depends on what you mean. For example, I believe it likely that biologically rooted psychological differences aren't that great, but those have evidently lead to cultural norms which are quite significantly different. I mean, surely you can agree with the idea that, in general, a man being propositioned for sex by an average woman will react much better than a w…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/24 11:26 PM
–

How is it not arrogant to assert a personal opinion going against current scientific standard as fact without justification?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/24 11:14 PM
–

No one knows that for certain, stop acting so arrogant. According to this article studies attempting to account for this still found a 3.25 to 1 ratio rather than 4.2 to 1 as is usual.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/24 10:28 PM
1

Compliments that matter most are ones from someone who genuinely cares about you as a person This is something that I'm sure is healthy, but I just can't get my head around. Surely, those people will have a skewed view, making their compliments less objective, no? Like, if my mom told me I'm handsome, that really did nothing for me. If I overheard some random acquaintances (not potential dating partners, otherwise even better for obvious reasons) talking about me and being like "yea he looks goo…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/23 08:36 AM
–

Curious sbout something, did the comments change your mind/act as a slight nudge? (assuming sources are accurately presented) If not, what kind of evidence do you think would be required to do so?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/23 07:51 PM
1

5 points is an overwhelming difference if the total is 18 points. It's more than 1.5 times the men! I don't neccesarily agree with the other guy but that was a stupid comment.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/23 05:57 PM
3

Look, it's either famous men or some random you never heard of and will have a hard time believing (What other option is there?). Any example will seem meek whatever way you look at it.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/23 05:54 PM
5

Literally true. The amount of pussy someone who's got himself figured out can pull (Or really the stuff they can achieve in ANY category) is insane.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/23 05:52 PM
5

Well, "experiences" are usually based on a few founding examples followed by a lot of confirmation bias. Just how humans work. There's a reason why no two people have the exact same opinions. And all of us think we're the ones who got it figured out. Maybe value your observations a bit less. Unless you think it's everyone else except you that has a warped view of reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/23 05:50 PM
2

Look, I'm not here to solve societal issues. Sure it would be great if men weren't so unphysical with each other and many men didn't feel so lonely because of it, but most are and we can't change that. Just try to make our tiny little circle of impact a little bit better and help our friends best we can. If you just wanna vent that your attempt at friendly behavior was misunderstood, I suppose that's fine, but it's not productive and really, it's not like anyones at fault anyway. It's just a fru…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/23 05:09 PM
1

I'd argue you having to think through your beliefs for an argument about them, especially beliefs that would be unquestioned in society, benefits yourself quite a bit. It certainly did me.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/23 03:24 PM
1

There are some ideas which are taboo in most circles. Things which can never be questioned. I don't like that that's a thing. If they're perhaps wrong (or not the whole story), then obviously that's bad, but even if they're correct, them not being discussed means you never see WHY they're correct. What the implications are. The deeper reasons. Also I've heard a lot of advice on how to act or not to act here that I didn't really think of before. Wether it's women being uncomfortable in some situa…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/23 03:22 PM
3

Obviously it's going to be misinterpreted when the only other times it happens is when it means that. It's no ones fault, they're just being logical with the experience they have, and you're just trying to be nice the best way you know. It's shitty and there's no way for you to fix that it's that way, but I guess one thing you can personally do, other than contribute to the way it is, is literally spelliing it out that you aren't into them that way while doing those gestures, even if it seems aw…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/23 03:09 PM
3

so no raping I don't know why but the way you wrote like telling a kid "we can go to the park, but no mud eating!", just seems so oddly funny.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/23 03:00 PM
1

I wouldn't agree. 50/50 implies you aren't doing as much as you can. Basically going "yea I did enough, she's gotta step it up a notch, she ain't doing more so I won't" If you're thinking that, it's already a bad sign. In a good relationship you'd assume of your partner that they're doing their best to balance both your needs, doing as much as they can, not just trying to do as much as is expected. I guess I get what you mean, if what is accomplished is considered 100% then 100/100 is equivalent…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/23 10:09 PM
2

Actions over words. Now I don't mean having sex. Go out of your way to see him. Don't let him pay. Someone stringing him along wouldn't do that. Also the cooking thing you mentioned. I like to plan my interactions so that there is no objective benefit to me other than seeing the other person and spending time with them. But do combine it with telling him I suppose. But the actions will make your words genuine.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/23 09:57 PM
1

I did some math, and here's something interesting to consider. There were around 630,000 abortions in 2019, let's multiple that by around 20 years of fertility (could be more, but we'll also assume some of them are repeat aborters, so it probably evens out) and we get about 13 million abortions per 350 million people, so per 170 million women Which results in a about 1/12 chance of an abortion over your lifetime. Since most women wouldn't require an abortion, is it really an inequality that they…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/23 04:19 PM
-1

Not really sure what it is you can do about it. You won't change that many women will act that way, that's for sure. Maybe a different approach to dealing with that? Completely cut them out of dating you if they show signs of using those measure? I suppose you could. Not quite sure what ideas you have in mind but do share!
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/22 04:57 PM
-1

But this is something that comes up in almost all types of situations, isn't it? Sure, if you can do something about people trying to break into your house, it's useful to let it bother you. But if it's something that you just can't change, the path to misery is paved with self-pity and rumination. Of course radical acceptance is not easy, but it would surely leave you better of if you can manage practicing it.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/22 04:31 PM
9

Unfortunate that this was posted late as to be missed by most viewers of the post
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/22 07:29 PM
1

You sure have a lot of claims and not a lot of backing them up with something tangible. Take a look at abaxeron's comment on the matter, please.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/22 07:18 PM
1

Pretty sure the claim is based on the ratings being by their own judgement of what AVERAGE looks like. Kinda like this: Rate this person between 1 and 9, 5 being average ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) "average, 5" and the 80th percentile of men by rating score a 5 on average. It's not logically inconsistent. At least in the way the argument is usually framed.
/r/ExRedPill03/10/22 08:39 PM
5

Dude I love your writing style it's fucking amazing. Posts like this make it feel more like a friendgroup which helps younger guys like myself a lot in making these situations less "mysterious"! Also counter acts a lot of the blackpill-esk stuff from guys in the anger phase. Great post, wishyou were my mate haha! By the way, on the oral. I can recommend taking a look at "She comes first" instead of copying porn stuff. From what I've read that's just not that great, they mostly care about having …
/r/TheRedPill17/06/21 07:02 PM
1

lol
/r/askTRP19/07/20 12:27 AM
1

Or, you know, he just ain't a native english speaker.
/r/askTRP18/07/20 02:54 PM
2

I thought you get a visa/citizenship by relative if your kid is born in the usa? Isn't that how a lot of mexicans become legal? edit: https://www.alllaw.com/articles/nolo/us-immigration/become-permanent-resident-through-citizen-child.html Apparently this only applies if the kid if 21 and above, weird.
/r/askTRP02/07/20 03:09 AM
1

I can't seem to open any archive.is links on my Pc ("This site can’t be reached archive.is refused to connect. Search Google for archive YaML ERR_CONNECTION_REFUSED"), does anyone know a fix to this?
/r/askTRP28/06/19 09:39 PM
33

Here's the post before it got deleted for you guys: Married for 1 year, together since high school. I went grocery shopping today and I forgot to buy my wife the ice cream she requested. I didn't think it was a big deal, but she exploded at me. She was extremely upset. My wife said I always forget to do things, and the fact that I can't even buy her ice cream makes me a bad husband. I tried to calm her down but she wouldn't hear any of it, and she told me to sleep on the couch. I'm sleeping on m…
/r/MensRights30/03/18 01:49 PM
2

Note how /r/feminism is of course again saying it's because of misogyny
/r/MensRights25/02/18 11:30 AM
0

I think you might be better off doing both. The teacher will probably screw you over if you do it on men.
/r/MensRights22/02/18 02:20 PM
3

not very adept at logical and long-term thinking Would you suggest people having to take a test to determine if voting rights should be given as a solution?
/r/MensRights31/12/17 07:19 PM
1

That's some Jordan Peterson levels of wisdom you got going there.
/r/MensRights29/11/17 06:33 PM
8

Average trends of groups say nothing about a given individual within the group.
/r/MensRights26/11/17 05:11 PM
11

Even /r/Feminism hates her.
/r/MensRights18/11/17 11:12 AM
2

Don't quite remember the exact numbers but a huge amount of prison inmates grew up fatherless and only a fraction of that motherless. IIRC the numbers evened out though if you looked at rates of single mothers vs single father as well. Pretty sure it's single parenthood and not single mothers from what I remember
/r/MensRights16/11/17 04:25 PM
2

IANAL Can't quite figure that one out, what's it mean?
/r/MensRights14/11/17 04:35 PM
1

Little bit of advice, paste the url into the search bar, it'll show you posts linking to the same url.
/r/MensRights08/11/17 04:57 PM
1

I don't think so. Last statistic I saw showed only 1% of males being feminists in the UK or USA (Or some other western country.) However, I can imagine conservatives and older men being against drafting women and that being where these 27% come from.
/r/MensRights08/11/17 04:55 PM
2

Even banned men from becoming or voting on them in Germany iirc.
/r/MensRights06/11/17 06:07 PM
1

Pretty sure that they're separating chess because around 95+% of tournament players are male. In my area there are 177 rated players, 6 of which are female. Seems like they want the girls to not feel like the only female chess players in their given area.
/r/MensRights26/10/17 04:06 PM
2

Unreliable test, don't waste your time on it.
/r/MGTOW25/10/17 04:20 PM
14

It's easier to rule a city than it is to rule oneself. -J. Peterson (I think)
/r/MensRights22/10/17 09:31 AM
4

But what about OP?
/r/MensRights20/10/17 04:02 PM
3

Uneducated guess: Only the top 1% (pulled that number out of my ass for sake of argument) of women in regards to competitiveness and conscientiousness reach high-ranked positions since they usually care less to do so, while say only the top 5% (again, made up number) of men reach said positions --> End result: High-ranked women are more cruel than high ranked men
/r/MensRights13/10/17 01:50 PM
-1

So what?
/r/MensRights09/10/17 05:15 PM
2

Imagine your dad believed the same thing, where'd you be now?
/r/MensRights04/10/17 07:34 PM
10

Fuck off to r/ TheRedpill - - - >
/r/MensRights03/10/17 12:04 PM
2

Noteworthy how there are like at least 10 privileges under the law on this list compared to 1 on male privilege lists. (Being the whole "Don't show your breasts in public" thing)
/r/MensRights02/10/17 04:00 PM
2

Get the fuck on /r/theredpill where you belong
/r/MensRights01/10/17 03:01 PM
9

Literally what feminists say about MRA/Whites
/r/MensRights30/09/17 05:45 PM
2

Last one has to be a joke. There's no other way.
/r/MensRights30/09/17 06:55 AM
1

Wow, you've gotten that fucked up that you'll even question something like that? The hell do you work in that your view of women is that screwed up. But fine, if you want specifics: She basically did all the house work there is, going around the house, cleaning every room, washing all of the clothes, doing dishes, doing everything my father was incapable of doing due to sickness, basically. I'll recount one of her visits as good as memory allows me to, if you so wish. She comes by, greats me and…
/r/MensRights11/09/17 04:37 PM
1

Think of the women in your family Funny that you'd say something like that, because the women in my family were/are arguably the hardest working people I know. My aunt for example, whenever she was over she was basically working all the time, helping us in every way possible, and would only complain under the rarest of circumstances. Hell, it was difficult to get her to take a brake because she was so eager to help. Easily the most conscientious and agreeable person I know. My mother even after …
/r/MensRights11/09/17 03:21 PM
1

I'm guessing you believe her getting 2 degrees in physics is just propaganda and lies too then? Jesus Christ, please tell me you're just trolling.
/r/MensRights11/09/17 02:37 PM
11

(The mind of a female is completely destroyed in adolescence with the massive destruction caused by a serge in estrogen, but that is a discussion for another day). How the fuck do you explain Marie Curie and other female scientific geniuses then.
/r/MensRights08/09/17 05:07 PM
1

That's why I wrote "I suspect". That one wasn't an argument, more of a idea on the subject that just popped into my mind as one possible reason. The other two were though. Good that you pointed out the suicidal ideation thing, though. Didn't look into it as much as it just seemed very likely considering women are higher in neuroticism. By the way half the reason Guess I should've phrased it as "One possible reason" to be more representative of what I was saying, though.
/r/MensRights29/08/17 02:04 PM
1

Scratch the suicide statistic. The only reason we make up 80 % of suicides it's cause we're so goddamn good at actually doing it. Women attempt suicide about 3 times more than men. So we're literally just 12 times better at killing ourselves than women are. Next up: workplace deaths. Men choose more dangerous jobs in the same way women choose lower paying jobs. Implying that because we die more often in the workplace it's somehow rigged against us is as ridiculous as implying women get paid less…
/r/MensRights29/08/17 09:36 AM
2

Look at the reddit demographic. Pretty much every other subreddit is a XYChromosome subreddit.
/r/MensRights29/08/17 09:22 AM
4

Aren't they like autobanning everyone subbed to MensRights?
/r/MensRights27/08/17 01:11 PM
1

My comparison is the way the jews had their rights removed in Nazi Germany. We probably agree, but just have different standards of what we consider a war.
/r/MensRights25/08/17 11:33 AM
1

Yes and usually I agree with you but I doubt there is a "war" being fought. Maybe my formulation was a bit inaccurate. There's a lot of actual male discrimination going on and just the fact that feminism's biggest concern is that they might lose some abortion rights shows that their movement is not needed. I don't think it's anything close to a "war on men" or something like that. Maybe if feminism and misandry grow a lot in the upcoming years, but right now, not even close. There's just a very …
/r/MensRights23/08/17 11:44 PM
1

Nope. Maybe a bit of a disadvantage in some aspects, advantage in others. Might have the slightly shorter stick in society, but it isn't anything too significant. After all men's better biological advantages are also pretty nice.
/r/MensRights23/08/17 05:33 PM
1

Switch the genders and I doubt anyone would even for a second believe this to be real, because it would be so absolutely ludicrous. But thanks to feminism one's reaction might even be "meh... I've seen worse."
/r/MensRights12/07/17 08:28 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter