TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ChemicalRascal Archive

View 0 posts and 360 comments by ChemicalRascal on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

True, you are right there - cocaine is a psychological addiction, not a chemical dependency. I'm not sure why I didn't mention this explicitly, but if a pusher wants to progress from cocaine usage to a physical addiction all he'd have to do is start cutting an amount of methamphetamine into the cocaine samples. Takes work, would be noticeable to the victim, sure, true, but if you can bluff for a while that the new stimuli is due to it being a different batch for long enough, well, your cocaine u…
/r/seduction04/10/14 03:53 AM
0

Teetotaling? What, no, I've got nothing against responsible drug usage. I mean, I don't do anything myself, because I don't care for that sort of thing and would rather keep my head clear for academic purposes, but I live with people who do drugs. Are they playing chicken with the law? Sure. Do I think it might be having a negative impact on their lives? Well, one thinks he can astral project and that astral projection was the source of all scientific progress ever, so maybe he's taking his LSD …
/r/seduction04/10/14 12:36 AM
2

Cool beans. You're an idiot. In six months, try to remember that your family actually does love you.
/r/seduction03/10/14 11:11 PM
3

Grandpa? I'm twenty-two years old. You're an arrogant idiot that doesn't understand that nobody just throws expensive drugs at people for no reason. You might disagree with me now. Sure, fine, whatever. I just hope that in six months time someone who cares about you slaps your ass back into reality.
/r/seduction03/10/14 11:00 PM
3

"Your boy" is a drug pusher, and is trying to turn you into an addict. At which point he starts charging you money. Because you enjoy it, you use it more often. Because you use it more often, you build up a tolerance. Because you build up a tolerance, you need more and more to achieve that high. And that costs more and more money. More and more money that'll be going into the pockets of "your boy", and he's gonna be laughing as he takes it from you. Because you've developed a chemical dependency…
/r/seduction03/10/14 09:06 PM
1

At the same time, it's important to recognize those corrections. Not everyone is actually going to be attracted to a given person, and that's okay, but it's best to realise that without making the other person uncomfortable (or receiving a can of mace directly to your eyes).
/r/seduction02/10/14 09:08 AM
8

Let 'em know, if you feel it's important, but in doing so you need to own it. Some people might have an issue with your lack of experience, but eh, fuck 'em - what the majority of people will find to be off-putting is if you are insecure about it. In other words, confidence is key. If someone asks you about your sexual history and you break down crying, yeah, very unattractive. Answering with frank, open honesty - "Actually, I'm a virgin. *drink sip*" or whatever - is at least not unattractive. …
/r/seduction07/09/14 03:00 PM
2

I think /u/im_fucking_zeez_brah felt that your analogy was unneeded, and that's probably the extent of eir feelings. It seems quite a stretch to read offence into eir words, Robby.
/r/seduction22/08/14 03:43 AM
1

You wont excel if you keep putting limitations on yourself. If I can do it, you can do it. Push yourself to improve yourself, learn new things, and maintain a positive attitude. If you wont improve yourself and you keep up with the I'm an introvert or I'm antisocial excuse then I suggest you unsubscribe from Seddit. Seduction requires you to get out there and meet new people and it's impossible to excel with that attitude. Good luck, my friend. I literally just returned home from spending the ni…
/r/seduction18/08/14 09:25 PM
1

You enjoy being sapped of your energy. Right. What you're describing isn't introversion. Introverts can enjoy social interaction. They simply don't thrive on it.
/r/seduction18/08/14 03:16 AM
0

Do you get off on calling people names and using expletives on the internet?
/r/seduction17/08/14 03:44 PM
1

You win! *confetti*
/r/seduction17/08/14 02:48 PM
0

Eh, this isn't an argument I'm going to waste time on.
/r/seduction17/08/14 07:11 AM
1

Feedback is feedback is feedback. He might simply have wanted to share how he felt about the idea, as to why it may not be a cure-all.
/r/seduction17/08/14 05:06 AM
1

Neuroplasticity and introversion/extroversion are unrelated. A quick F3 shows the terms aren't even on the page, please read what you link. Nor does your NCBI link, and so. However, I must also apologise, because nor does introversion/extroversion. They actually seem to be personality traits. Legitimate introversion (as opposed to special-snowflake self-labelling without an understanding of the actual trait) cannot be changed.
/r/seduction17/08/14 05:02 AM
1

Did you find that social interaction literally sapped you of energy? Because there's a difference between the anti-social and the introvert.
/r/seduction17/08/14 04:53 AM
-15

That's really not how introversion/extroversion works. Like, at all. One's sociability isn't a fucking muscle, you can't retrain psychology and dopamine receptors.
/r/seduction16/08/14 11:41 PM
3

I bet she does! ... To OP's crotch! ... Ha!
/r/seduction26/06/14 12:45 AM
3

Nothing wrong with going to a hair stylist. Some people want that clean, neat look, and to keep up with or explore hair trends. Dafuq are you to judge?
/r/seduction07/04/14 07:33 AM
17

Nrrg, it annoys me that people have downvoted you, as all you've done is ask a question. The direct answer is no - there's no time limit after which you're clear to begin initiating more sexual lines of conversation. And the reason this is the case is that people - and yes, women are people - aren't machines, they aren't games. Consider yourself for a moment, and think of a friend you have, but who you aren't attracted to. Doesn't have to be a woman, indeed, it'll probably be easier to illustrat…
/r/seduction15/02/14 09:39 AM
3

Eehhh. No, and I'm somewhat concerned that your question is based on a misunderstanding of how attraction "works". I'm somewhat indisposed at the moment, though, so I'll write up what I mean in a few hours. Don't feel too bad about what I've said, though, it's a topic worth chatting about.
/r/seduction15/02/14 08:12 AM
8

Absolutley this, there's a time and a place. I've been making a similar mistake in the recent past, but the main take away message is that too sexual too early - especially if attraction isn't there yet - is really creepy and irritating. TL,DR: Don't lead with sex talk unless you wanna get maced.
/r/seduction15/02/14 02:52 AM
1

Ah. For something like that, a probationary sentence sounds a lot more reasonable.
/r/MensRights01/02/14 11:22 PM
16

The charge wouldn't have been that she hit the children, but rather that she engaged in poor driving that resulted in death, or that she drove intoxicated that resulted in death, or that she committed vehicular homicide (if she had intent to kill the children). It's not nessecarily a criminal act to hit someone with a vehicle. Consider, for example, a driver who hits a suicidal pedestrian - the driver has hit someone, but committed no crime. The same goes for unfortunate, unavoidable accidents.
/r/MensRights01/02/14 09:24 AM
1

... But shit, it was ninety-nine cents?
/r/MensRights13/01/14 08:34 PM
19

The letter "I" is so phallic! An abomination!
/r/MensRights12/01/14 11:57 PM
2

Why?
/r/MensRights30/12/13 02:37 PM
3

Shame he wasn't doing his work two months ago, when Cole was imprisoned.
/r/MensRights02/11/13 11:44 AM
4

Great, now I'm picturing my grandparents taking part in a beer bong.
/r/seduction31/10/13 03:17 PM
2

It implies knowledge about gender, and confuses things. And, for the record, there are nontrivial usage of the feminine as default. For example, every DnD manual I've ever seen. Not to mention the danger of using gendered language around third-wave Feminazis.
/r/MensRights30/10/13 01:16 AM
1

Eh, like I said, I prefer Elverson. It's just singular they, but with the "th" dropped.
/r/MensRights29/10/13 09:58 AM
-5

It's a personal preference. I just don't like it. EDIT: My opinion is bad and I should feel bad!
/r/MensRights29/10/13 09:06 AM
-15

I know. Unless you're talking about Swedish (and hence the Swedish plural pronoun), in which case I didn't know, and thanks. That said, I firmly believe we shouldn't use "they", because it is, after all, a denotation of multiple people, and sometimes you do know specifically that only one person is being referred to. (I like Elverson as an alternative, personally.)
/r/MensRights29/10/13 04:46 AM
-4

Ah, but that's the thing. Male != man, and female != woman. Male and female are, indeed, terms for the sex of a person (although I'd like to note that defining it by chromosome would refer to genetic sex, not what's goin' on between the legs, as reassignment surgery is a thing, which I believe is referred to as physical sex). However, man and woman are terms for the gender identity of a person, ergo, what's going on in their head. Now, society at large often doesn't care to be distinct between t…
/r/MensRights29/10/13 04:42 AM
113

Not to mention, having a gender-neutral pronoun is actually a damn good idea for scenarios in which gender is ambiguous or straight-up unknown. As for Sweden introducing "hen" when it's already used in English - Who cares? Swedish is a separate language. Woopdefrig, there's overlap, wow, that's never happened before.
/r/MensRights29/10/13 04:30 AM
5

Honestly, it's just extremism - either someone somewhere will misinterpret something and take it too far, or someone somewhere is going to see an existing banner and hide under it in order to preach their ideologies with lessened fear of criticism or debate. To be honest, I think it happens with all groups and movements to some extent. /r/theredpill seems to be a fairly good example of this in our fledgling MR movement (not to say that they everything they say is utter bullshit, but from my brie…
/r/MensRights27/09/13 10:14 PM
1

I really don't understand the point of the post either, but fortunately it appears the downvotes have spoken. Perhaps there is hope yet.
/r/seduction26/09/13 05:52 PM
1

In that case, I assume you'd be happy to repost it as a comment here. And read what I said before. My stance has nothing to do with TPUA's moderatorship.
/r/seduction25/09/13 10:50 AM
1

Because I have pre-existing knowledge that sweating out toxins is bullshit, and so forth. I could dive through scientific journals to find out for sure, but I feel that's somewhat over the top for this discussion. Of course, if you had not deleted your content, we would have been able to discuss further points than what can be put together from TPUA's comment. Alas.
/r/seduction25/09/13 10:26 AM
1

It's not the discussion of exercise that's the issue, fuck man, did you even read ThrowawayPUA's comment? It's the reasons you gave. The bullshit about toxins and oxygen to the brain. That's what was criticised. Fuck!
/r/seduction25/09/13 08:04 AM
1

Hum. Could it be possible that your constant refusal to discuss your own content is a sign that you believe it to be fundamentally flawed?
/r/seduction24/09/13 08:51 PM
1

Option 3: I'm one of the individuals that doesn't memorise every goddamn word Mystery has ever said, especially because I'm more of an ardent of RSD-style. Indeed, Option 3, subset A: I'm a strait, male individual who (blahblahblah) and just got hit on by a male PUA. Hmmm. Love it, by the way, how we're talking about your content, and getting some great discussion going on that. Good stuff. Love it.
/r/seduction24/09/13 11:13 AM
1

That depends on how you define beaten, Freud, and by whom. I wasn't abused. And what the hell does this have to do with your content, and your inability to discuss said content?
/r/seduction24/09/13 05:19 AM
1

It's actually a single word: "facepalm". Furthermore, 'acts' indicated by asterisks are traditionally written without initial capitalisation, like the following: *facepalm* Of course, on reddit, asterisks are used to denote italics, and hence "facepalm" is generally acceptable as an alternate. On a more serious note, please, start engaging with your audience. If someone wishes to discuss your content, debate with them. Don't just insult them and run off snickering. We want to discuss and debate …
/r/seduction24/09/13 04:56 AM
1

That's probably because it's one of the bigger communities you post on - you might notice that we've almost a hundred and fifty subscribers. With the voting system, negative reception is more obvious. Furthermore, reddit in general has a fairly strong existing culture of critical analysis - hence, as this spills into seddit, posts here are going to be analysed where as otherwise they may have been simply accepted. I would like to note, though, that we aren't negative. Critical analysis isn't a n…
/r/seduction24/09/13 01:35 AM
1

Nah, man, I'm concerned about your mental health. Furthermore, I'm also concerned about the health of the community, because as you run a community I'd hate to see you develop an intense hatred for seddit, and hence possibly lead to a theoretical, significant fracture between GBTN and seddit. On the same topic, as evidenced by yourself running a community, you obviously do have some accomplishment in the field, and hence "losing" you from the seddit community would be a non-zero loss - Everyone …
/r/seduction23/09/13 01:48 PM
1

He never said that promoting exercise is harmful, he said that the reasons you promote exercise under are bullshit. To use a simple analogy, consider the situation where a man is vomiting heavily and has extreme stomach pains. Person A advises the man to go to the hospital, citing concerns that the issue may be life threatening. Person B advises the man to go to the hospital, citing concerns that were he not to, a legion of angry robots may descend from the heavens and slap the ill man across th…
/r/seduction23/09/13 12:29 PM
3

I honestly don't think he's a troll - he's got quite extensive website, YouTube, and reddit histories, and it seemed quite level-headed (although self-promotey). Over the last three days, however, he's imploded - I'm strongly of the opinion it was mainly triggered by his previous thread on the topic of natural game. As a result, he's developed a negative opinion of the seddit community, which has lead to him being aggressive in this community, making the differences in ideology between himself a…
/r/seduction22/09/13 02:29 PM
1

If you espouse "haters gonna hate" mentality, then why do you feel it necessary to call people AA-ridden or gay?
/r/seduction22/09/13 02:28 PM
1

Yep. Because you can tell that /u/Selpurcs does not approach women from a short comment. And attacking your target audience - the community of this subreddit - works. Nobody ever won anyone over by fighting them.
/r/seduction22/09/13 02:20 PM
1

It's ultimately your own choice to make. If you feel like you would gain experience from it, and you value that potential of experience above the time "lost" spent perusing this woman, obviously go for it. One might be concerned that a lack of attraction may lead to a different level/style of performance during dates and so on, so that might be worthy of keeping in mind, but that doesn't entirely invalidate any experience gained from the venture.
/r/seduction22/09/13 09:08 AM
2

I'm not the problem here.
/r/seduction22/09/13 08:52 AM
2

I love it how, over the last few days, you've just gone further and further off the rails. Anybody who has even the slightest hint of a word against you is summarily insulted and dismissed without even an inch of consideration - Indeed a shame, because these people seek do discuss and debate the topic of seduction with you, and in response you only have juvenile anger for them. Reconsider your conduct, and perhaps also your world-views. You cannot succeed with them as they currently are.
/r/seduction22/09/13 07:42 AM
2

Nah, you don't sound overly judgemental, that sounds pretty reasonable. We all have flaws, of course, but you might be right in that there's a weird culture that doesn't push women to improve themselves. Of course, that might be true for men as well, after all - We are both obviously readers of seddit and suchforth, and hence the culture of male self-improvement may be overrepresented in our minds. I don't know. I'd wonder, though, if this has to do with the whole acceptance movement/culture/wha…
/r/seduction22/09/13 07:31 AM
2

Your repeated attacks against my person, and lack of engagement on the actual topic of debate, does nothing to validate your proposed routine. I urge you to actually think through things before you post them, and consider the overall discussion. What you've currently posted is, sadly, quite juvenile. And I've seen your YouTube posts, you're a grown man. Doing things such as calling myself homosexual is beneath you - Or, at least, should be beneath you.
/r/seduction22/09/13 06:39 AM
2

Truly, your communication skills are impeccable. Care to tell us what the fuck "kjing" is supposed to be?
/r/seduction22/09/13 06:23 AM
2

And now, we truly see the depth of your self-illusion. If you actually care about the routine - and, given how you continue this, I suspect you do - either describe how it fundamentally works, or demonstrate it. Do not, however, expect that people will do this for you. It is not the job of the skeptic to prove that what he is skeptical of.
/r/seduction22/09/13 05:49 AM
3

Well, the thing about identifying "when women fuck up" is that it doesn't further personal growth. Sure, if you go out, have a perfect night and seduce a HB10, hop in a taxi, but then suddenly she projectile vomits everywhere and starts screaming about her days back in 'Nam, yeah, you can look back and say "Well she was nuts. I did everything I could right, but it still didn't happen." And the 'blame' of the night, though I use the term loosely, is on her. Thing is, though - there are always gon…
/r/seduction22/09/13 02:24 AM
2

No, man. Have a look at how your post has fared. The community seems to disagree with you. And you've had to resort to insulting me instead of being able to just explain how the routine works. Surely this demonstrates that even though you think you're right, you're actually entirely unable to see the reality of the matter and in a state of utter denial.
/r/seduction22/09/13 01:55 AM
4

Yeah, my bad. The post is still in thegadfly's history, though.
/r/seduction21/09/13 10:20 AM
1

Don't you mean "a little, pathetic, approach-anxiety-afflicted tool"? Man, you need to work on your language skills. You kinda suck at communicating.
/r/seduction21/09/13 09:53 AM
1

Well, no, I'm not going to go out with a routine (well, that's true by itself, because I prefer to not use canned stuff) that consists of random words with a number request duct-taped onto the end. Your routine does not make any sense. Heck, the main "line" of it about French men is at best utterly bewildering.
/r/seduction21/09/13 09:36 AM
19

I highly suggest that people take a short dive through /u/thegadfly 's reddit history (thegadfly being the OP that lead to the linked comment), specifically this later post on r/foreveralone. It seems to me that he approached seduction with two fundamental errors: an entirely self-negative standpoint ("I tried creating a completely fictional history for myself to cover up my past", for example, see also how he dropped a development job for journalism (although it is, admittedly, my own assumptio…
/r/seduction21/09/13 07:24 AM
4

Note the word "this" in the self text.
/r/seduction21/09/13 07:09 AM
1

No, it's not a matter that your routine doesn't go into detail and that's required, it's more that your routine... Doesn't make any sense. I mean, you say in another comment that "Most women will give you their number because the message they receive is quite flattering." Now, ignoring the likely falsehood of that statement, the problem is that your routine has no such message. Because "You know in France men will force themselves into taxis just to get a woman to go to dinner with them." doesn'…
/r/seduction21/09/13 03:53 AM
2

Explain to me how the fuck it's supposed to work! Dive into it. Break down the psychology behind it. It isn't on me to prove your postulation, man.
/r/seduction20/09/13 05:25 PM
3

I understand that, but that... doesn't make any sense. It doesn't flow from proposing that you force yourself into a taxi to hey btw digits plz. I mean, unless the aim is to utterly bewilder the poor girl with this bizarre cyclone of conversation, hoping that she'll give out her number on reflex.
/r/seduction20/09/13 05:00 PM
2

"Men will force themselves into taxis just to get a woman to go to dinner with them." "Do I need to do that with you?" <#-close> I'm sorry... What? What? Read over what you wrote to ensure you haven't missed some sort of crucial part of this, because it looks like there's a chunk missing.
/r/seduction20/09/13 04:48 PM
5

Yes, but you shouldn't.
/r/seduction06/08/13 11:54 AM
-5

Sigh.
/r/MensRights19/06/13 12:04 PM
-6

We're not discussing my opinion, keep on topic.
/r/MensRights19/06/13 11:28 AM
-3

No, I mean the Straw Man fallacy. How does that even make sense?
/r/MensRights19/06/13 11:27 AM
-5

I would say that "Preferably white (as there will be children around)" and "Preferably female (as there will be children around)" are entirely nonequivalent, on the grounds that they represent two separate issues: one is racism, the other is sexism (or, at least, that is what we take them to be examples of, but that's a different tangent). They are not entirely equivalent, because the former being unfairly discriminatory is well-established in society. The latter is not well established so. In m…
/r/MensRights19/06/13 11:18 AM
-5

No, that's not my opinion. However, taking that the argument is of supposed sexism, and discussing a different example of racism, means that you're not arguing the example of sexism! We understand that racism is bad, mkay! Argue the topic!
/r/MensRights19/06/13 11:07 AM
-7

Yes, it's an analogy. By employing that analogy, he is using the Straw Man fallacy. He's replacing the argument with something more easily counter-argued. However, this isn't a matter of racism, and hence racism has sweet shit-all to do with it. Argue the case - sexism.
/r/MensRights19/06/13 09:58 AM
-13

It's nonsensical is what it is. Besides, you're employing the Straw Man fallacy. Argue against the argument, not a self-invented, obviously flawed replacement of.
/r/MensRights19/06/13 09:16 AM
9

Care to expound? Some of us haven't read it (yet).
/r/seduction15/06/13 08:22 PM
0

And, furthermore to the point - He's making 6 figures, and he's come to reddit for legal advice?
/r/MensRights15/06/13 06:07 PM
3

Well yes, exactly. If it was deserved, is that a bad thing?
/r/MensRights15/06/13 05:53 PM
1

http://youtu.be/n8LAnqiPF6k
/r/MensRights15/06/13 05:52 PM
2

It's demeaning to both of them. Honestly, it's directly analogous to me asking President Obama if the First Lady is a lesbian. The question is beneath both of them.
/r/MensRights15/06/13 03:24 PM
5

NO. WE MUST FIGHT. HUNT EACH OTHER DOWN. AND THEN DUEL TO THE DEATH. IT IS THE ONLY HONOURABLE WAY!
/r/MensRights15/06/13 01:22 PM
8

Guess we're gonna cancel each other out, then, because I can't goddamn stand the Liberal party's NBN-related dumbassery. Honestly, I don't think the asylum seekers and press would be better off under a Coalition government. Mining/Carbon Tax... Eh, I'd need to see the numbers and such, and to my understanding, the reason the Mining Tax flopped was because of poor economic forecasting in general. I'm generally in favour of higher taxes, though, and generally consider myself moderate-left economic…
/r/MensRights15/06/13 01:02 PM
2

But it is demeaning.
/r/MensRights15/06/13 12:45 PM
9

Eh. Australian here - Gillard has been copping quite a lot of flack while the Opposition Leader, a right-winger named Tony Abbott, has been more or less ignored. She's had a lot more scrutiny than other leaders, she's just come off a week involving the "menu-gate" scandal (in which a mock event menu was leaked, which included a parody entry discussing her, via the simile of a chicken, as having "small breasts and large thighs"), and she's Australian's first female PM. I'd say she's under quite a…
/r/MensRights15/06/13 12:45 PM
1

Well, yes, exactly. No male PM would be questioned on the sexuality of his wife.
/r/MensRights15/06/13 12:38 PM
1

It'd be rather damaging to the public image of the Prime Minister, given that not everybody in Australia is as open minded as you and I. I say that as an Australian, mind, I'm not trying to call Australians backwards or non-progressive. 'tis just how the majority works.
/r/MensRights15/06/13 12:36 PM
4

Aw, come on. She's a public figure. If she hadn't NOPENOPENOPEd the topic, people would take her lack of strident denial as evidence of the contrary.
/r/MensRights15/06/13 12:33 PM
5

It does take a certain kind of logic to go from "huh, this kind of kick can cause serious injury" to "huh, let's hope it happens more". Come on, IcarusLived, don't be daft. Why the hell are people so quick to call for violence against their fellow human these days? 's stupid, I say.
/r/MensRights12/06/13 05:43 PM
1

Hey, are we going to keep doing this or what?
/r/MensRights12/06/13 04:41 AM
1

Nonononononononononono. Look, I'm happy to discuss this with you. I want to discuss this with you. Let's discuss this. Let's just discuss this without the insults and the name calling, 's all I ask. I'm reading Hembling's article, though, and he really doesn't make your point well. He basically says "Yeah, so if you call yourself a feminist but you're not a radfem, don't call yourself a feminist because you're giving the radfems cover rahrahrah." The problem is two-fold: Firstly, he acknowledges…
/r/MensRights10/06/13 03:47 AM
1

It's not that I'm scared of words, Aryo, it's that I'd rather maintain a certain level of discussion and keep things above a certain line. I don't want what could be a fruitful discussion to be marred and scarred by ad-homenim and similar, because that's not how good, intellectual debates occur. What I wonder, though, given your recent replies - Are you actually capable of responding in a civilised manner, without attempting to insult me at every turn? If you aren't, maybe you should step away f…
/r/MensRights08/06/13 06:06 AM
1

No, you really didn't. Go back and re-do your arguments without the name-calling and the insults.
/r/MensRights08/06/13 05:12 AM
1

Look at all of this nonsense. I'm just going to go over your points quickly since I'm not going to quote every single thing here. No, you're not. You're going to go back and cover every thing, like I am, and you're going to do it without resorting to insults. Until then: tubas.
/r/MensRights08/06/13 03:40 AM
1

Oh, of course. I prefer to assume it's an error of knowledge rather than hand, however, as it's no skin off my nose either way, and if its the former, there's a net benefit (as the distinction/correction was learned). If it's the latter, a case you suggest I shouldn't dismiss, it's a minor annoyance. The reason I acknowledge dyslexia specifically, however, is that I know that being constantly reminded of your errors in such a situation would become quite annoying, quite quickly. I'm... Was the "…
/r/MensRights07/06/13 10:36 AM
-1

Side note: If I feel an argument postulated by yourself is ridiculous, I will rebut it by posting a link to a video of someone playing a tuba, and a short explanation as to why I feel it's ridiculous. Future examples include: Arguments based entirely on ad-homenim and insult. So... modern feminism. Actual feminism. Even though the "feminist extremists" have existed since its inception, of course. Let's break this down, because you're not going to lump terms together to associate them. So... mode…
/r/MensRights07/06/13 06:16 AM
-3

Haha, you're a twit. :|
/r/MensRights07/06/13 05:52 AM
0

What are you talking about? How far into my past have you dived? I've tried arguing against SRS, for example, although you wouldn't see that because it was deleted. I've also spoken spades in favor of r/MR, but not recently because I haven't seen much bashing of it in other subs. But I assure you, when I do see it, I speak against it. I don't think that feminism is great. I feel that suffrage and second wave are adequate and have or do meet their goals, and that third wave feminism needs to die …
/r/MensRights07/06/13 05:50 AM
-2

Downvoted for just calling me names and sprouting your own rhetoric. I'm a MRA, dude, I'm a guy, 'sall cool bro.
/r/MensRights07/06/13 05:20 AM
-4

I know the definitions. MRA fights for male equality. Feminism fights for female equality. Victory by definitions, my favourite! Unfortunately, what we often only see here at r/MR is the feminist extremists, and "third-wave" feminism. I like to call these people "feminazis" and "ALNFMs" (American Lesbian Neo-Feminist Misandrists), because random insults are fun and should be encouraged in order to provoke an emotional response, right? Wait, no. Let's just call them third-wavers and/or extremists…
/r/MensRights07/06/13 05:01 AM
-2

Thanks! And yeah, subreddits (indeed, human communities in general) that rally around a cause tend to form these weird echo-chambers for certain ideas. It's actually really, really sad, and makes me loose an itty-bitty-bit of faith in humanity. But then I remember we invented coffee, and get happy again. And yeah, that's probably true, but I wouldn't say that they fight for feminism when they speak out against/fight against male circumcision, in the same way that I don't fight for men's rights w…
/r/MensRights07/06/13 04:53 AM
-2

(Lovin' the rhetoric, bro! Keep it up, we'll sure show this feminist who's boss! Yeah!)
/r/MensRights07/06/13 04:51 AM
1

I actually agree with you, and it pains me to see you mindlessly downvoted. We're MRAs! We fight what we know. I wouldn't hold a feminist to fight against male circumcision, because it doesn't make sense for a feminist to do so. Similarly, I wouldn't fight female circumcision under the banner of MRA-dom - I'd either be acting as a feminist or an egalitarian were I to do so, as female circumcision doesn't come under "the social and legal equality of men and boys".
/r/MensRights07/06/13 03:22 AM
4

Minor grammar note: You probably mean "does", not "dose". If you're not aware, "dose" means to give medicine (as a verb), a regular amount of medicine (as a noun), or other meanings depending on context. My apologies if you are dyslexic or similar, of course. But if the case is that you simply weren't aware of the distinction, well, now you know!
/r/MensRights07/06/13 03:18 AM
5

No, men just got not-using-a-condom shamed. I mean, I'm all for having as much sex as possible, because sex is awesome, but if you're having sex with strangers or having sex with people who have sex with strangers, there really aught to be a condom involved. Because HIV, herpes, and other STIs are kind of a big deal, yo.
/r/MensRights04/06/13 06:47 AM
1

Yeah, but phrases like "You dumb cunt" don't really help MRA's image. I understand the rage, but one must be ever vigilant - the walls have ears!
/r/MensRights03/06/13 10:42 PM
10

TL,DR: It's a bit overly coercive, so it's easy to see how a particularly sensitive third-wave feminist would take offence, and it might maybe just imply that something stronger than alcohol was used to spike a drink, but the sane interpretation is just that it's about "the mating rituals of Homo sapiens", shall we say. It's a thing, alcohol can be used as a drug. It does, after all, lower inhibitions, and is a depressant. Honestly, I'm sure it's been used to ply members of both genders into hav…
/r/MensRights03/06/13 02:31 PM
5

It's entirely satire.
/r/seduction03/06/13 01:56 PM
1

It's really not constructive, though, because what you're suggesting directly goes against a core principle of pick-up. One of the fundamental concepts of pick-up is calibration, which is adapting your own style, more or less on-the-fly, to the environment, culture, and person to make it more appropriate and successful. And really, it's obvious that this is the case. Some girls are really, really flirty, and respond well to a quick escalation and overt sexuality. Nothing wrong with that, of cour…
/r/seduction26/05/13 06:17 PM
3

You'll get better, don't worry. You've just got to keep at it, get your nose on that grinding stone.
/r/seduction26/05/13 04:33 PM
-5

No, no, no. Intent is what matters here. Specifically, negative intent. Incompetence/stupidity (and dogs and chocolate, whatever, I'm not going to entertain those further because you're being silly) has no implied negative intent. It's a simple mistake, born from a moment of carelessness, or similar. It's just someone not being good at their job and maybe not realising it. Greed has implied negative intent. It's an act of furthering one's self at the expense of others, a selfish, deliberate disr…
/r/MensRights17/05/13 05:29 AM
-11

Greed, when said greed impacts another person negatively, is a subset of malice. Either way, your comment is silly, because you've responded to "First assume that people are capable of mistakes" with "First assume that people are always acting purely of greed."
/r/MensRights17/05/13 04:54 AM
4

Tumblr posts aren't a form of publication. P_S was likely referring to publication in a periodical, such as The New Yorker (which is famous for it's political/sociological cartoons).
/r/MensRights17/05/13 04:38 AM
-10

You... Just took what he said and reversed it. No.
/r/MensRights17/05/13 04:32 AM
2

GRAB HER BY THE CHEEKS. FORCE HER TO GRIN. MENTION THAT SHE HAS A NICE SMILE. ALPHA. AS. FUCK.
/r/seduction13/05/13 06:37 AM
2

Oh, of course. In a private setting, it could most certainly work, and work well. But it's sure as hell not going to work during daygame, in the middle of a lecture, or during nightgame, in the middle of a club. Mainly because you won't have that level of attraction/comfort yet, but also because there's nowhere safe for it to land. Which is why I think it's inadvisable to tell newbies "Ah, just chuck the phone." If one has to do it, for whatever reason, it'd be better putting it in one's pocket.…
/r/seduction10/05/13 11:26 AM
1

Eh, that could work. I can just see some mildly drunk newbie going Phone snatch! Fling at wall- oh god it's shattered into a billion pieces.
/r/seduction10/05/13 10:20 AM
-1

I know. Hence "if you want to do this at all." It just seems like the phone is a lot less likely to break if you put it in your pocket, as opposed to throwing it across the room. There's probably a way to do it that gets the message across without being overly controlling, though, like holding it in your hands while tutting. I'm not sure, though - That's not really my style, you know?
/r/seduction10/05/13 10:17 AM
2

What? That sounds dangerous. Like, financially dangerous. Might just be easier to pocket it, if you want to do this at all.
/r/seduction10/05/13 05:36 AM
6

Ah, shit. Good point. Should I remove the link, perhaps?
/r/MensRights08/05/13 03:08 PM
-3

Pretty much. Although, like I said, a direct link would also provide karma. Also, fixed link because they see me derpin', they hatin'.
/r/MensRights08/05/13 03:00 PM
9

Threeeeaaaaaaaaaaaaaad. No idea why OP didn't just post a link to it. Probably because KARMA, even though any link does that. /tinfoil
/r/MensRights08/05/13 02:50 PM
8

You would have n dollars?, where n >= 1?
/r/seduction08/05/13 11:38 AM
17

YEAH, WELL, YOU'RE A SIMILE. Ha. I sure showed you.
/r/MensRights03/05/13 12:50 PM
22

No, removing a man's testes is like removing his testes.
/r/MensRights03/05/13 12:16 PM
14

Now that's what I call a close.
/r/seduction01/05/13 03:59 AM
5

WWII-wives support group, 50th year anniversary.
/r/seduction01/05/13 03:58 AM
1

I can't see the point in starting a conversation unless I know it's going to be actually read and considered by TDA. I mean, my goal is to convince TDA that seddit isn't full of crybabies or whatever - If I can't confirm that we can have a reasonable discourse, with both parties listening to each other and considering each side's arguments, there's no way I can achieve my goal, and so I won't waste my time. I really don't think the majority of the downvotes are for that, though - Given the typic…
/r/TheRedPill24/04/13 02:05 PM
-1

Oh! Well, I have no problem having this conversation in public. That's a non-issue. (Though the amount of downvotes I'm getting in this subreddit may limit the frequency of my replies.) Unless you mean that you don't have time to engage on a one-on-one conversation, even in public? Which is reasonable, I suppose.
/r/TheRedPill24/04/13 04:31 AM
0

Oh! Congratulations. I'm not sure what the random "Fuck." after all of that was for, but okay, perhaps another time.
/r/TheRedPill23/04/13 11:09 PM
-2

Unfortunately, it doesn't look like TDA has the time for it, but whatever.
/r/TheRedPill23/04/13 10:47 PM
-5

I know, thank you, I'm glad that you've acknowledged my free speech in this situation, but I'm not interested in sitting down and essaying at you here - I'm more interested in conversing with you, with a back-and-forth exchange that incrementally works it's way through your content. My problem is that I have a fairly full day today (Australia, so it's actually mid-morning) - I have to go buy some camera gear, have a coffee with someone, catch up on a bunch of studies, bust my ass revising more s…
/r/TheRedPill23/04/13 10:37 PM
-5

My quarrel isn't with you, it's okay, don't mind me.
/r/TheRedPill23/04/13 10:26 PM
-9

It's not that you infuriate us ('cause you don't, you lightly annoyed us) - It's more that you have a really shitty outlook, and you also failed to actually teach anything of value at all. I could go through your "Reddit is a Haven for Trolls" post and rebut each point, if you'd like, to demonstrate this, but I only want to do this if you're interested in it - If you're going to dismiss the challenge, there's no point. So, what of it? You ready to Rumble in the Debate Jungle, have ourselves a bi…
/r/TheRedPill23/04/13 09:49 PM
1

There's no reason to not try to hook up with them - after all, we're discussing sex, not marriage. I, personally, would try to tease 'em for caring about that, or say something about "limiting one's potential dating pool", but then again, I'm in Australia - we don't have that pseudoGreek stuff.
/r/seduction23/04/13 05:12 AM
24

So write about that and convey that experience. Brag less, teach more.
/r/seduction23/04/13 02:52 AM
5

"Good man. Get me a glass of water. Good man."
/r/MensRights16/04/13 01:46 AM
9

WHAT DOES EMAIL HAVE TO DO WITH ANYTHING?
/r/MensRights15/04/13 03:42 AM
1

So... You walk around viewing every action that influences you in an entirely neutral light? That seems pretty damaging - I mean, every interaction one can have has a potentially malicious side to it. Is it possible that you're just a lucid, self-aware paranoid?
/r/MensRights14/04/13 01:27 AM
1

You're goddamned right I am.
/r/MensRights11/04/13 12:22 AM
1

You might want to edit your post, replacing "OP" with "OP's post", as "OP" typically refers to the posting user.
/r/MensRights10/04/13 10:52 PM
1

Goddamnit, it's a simple mistake. Is every slip up a deeply-cutting insult to you?
/r/MensRights10/04/13 10:51 PM
2

Ey probably means the Original Post (as in, the image). Cool yer jets, broski moloski!
/r/MensRights10/04/13 12:17 PM
1

I'm trying to determine why ey feels the way he feels. Is that a bad thing to do?
/r/MensRights07/04/13 02:41 AM
1

I'm aware that it sounds bad, due to the connitations of the word - it's a loaded term. However, the term autistic is also the correct, medical term - there's no other word for it. It's not like Negro, where the offensive term is "nigger". That said, there are far more offensive ways to word what I said - for example, I didn't say "Omg ur a retard spastik kid lol". I used medically acurate terms, and tried to disclaim the loaded nature of the medica term with my own context, to show that no offe…
/r/MensRights07/04/13 01:56 AM
1

You just don't understand people at all, do you? Between your discussions with myself and your discussions with hmasing, it seems you just don't understand how society works.
/r/MensRights06/04/13 11:33 PM
1

Ah! Of course it is. Silly me, I didn't make the connection of "monkey" being a derogatory term for black persons. Thank you for the clarification (although I do hope I never need to use that knowledge).
/r/MensRights06/04/13 12:59 PM
2

I know, it's a shame. I do wonder if ey has some level of autism or something (I have Asperger-like traits, so while that's a terrible thing to say on such limited evidence, I'm in that boat too, so context), given that (based on my assumptions) ey seems to lack the ability to understand how offence works. That said, "porch monkey" seems to be equal parts saddening and bizarrely hilarious - though perhaps I simply lack the cultural awareness to understand the possible offensiveness of the term. …
/r/MensRights06/04/13 11:44 AM
4

Wait. Wait, wait, wait. "Nigger" isn't offensive? Mate, is it possible that you just aren't at all sensitive to what offence is? I mean, come on, you're using terms like "Oppression Olympics" and telling me to fuck myself. I mean, are you trying to cause offence? And then you go and say that if terms are accurate, they aren't offensive! That's patently wrong. And, furthermore, we can experiment on this to determine who is correct. Go up to an African American man and call him a "nigger". Say, pe…
/r/MensRights06/04/13 09:07 AM
-1

No. "Tranny" is, actually, offensive. It's kind of like the term "Negro"* being turned into the term "nigger." "Nigger" is incredibly offensive, while "Negro", it's root word, is not (or, at least, significantly less). The root of a word does not define if that word is offensive or not (in terms of the root being non-offensive - often, offensive roots will cause derived terms to be offensive by association and similarity). "Tranny", of course, is offensive because it's used so incredibly heavily…
/r/MensRights06/04/13 04:04 AM
7

You are seeing extremist feminism. It's very much the same as if Manhood Academy presented itself as a Men's Rights group (and meant/believed in it, instead of being the hopefully satirical thing it is). There are plenty of good feminists. My ex girlfriend is a feminist. But, from our discussions, I know that she would be disgusted by the actions of these plAffs*. Now, she is a (normal) feminist, not an egalitarian. There is a difference, in the same way that not all MRAs are egalitarians. She h…
/r/MensRights05/04/13 02:56 PM
5

I don't know, man, what is a flagrant? Huh? HUH? I'm just kidding. A flagrant is someone who whips themselves - typically used back in the middle ages to refer to a sect of Christians who self-whipped for the purposes of religious/spiritual purification. Wait, no, I've gotten that wrong. I mean flagellant. Thanks for the heads-up.
/r/MensRights31/03/13 06:12 PM
14

I'm looking at those statistics - forget sexless white knights, is it possible that the majority are just self-loathing flagrants flagellants? I mean, 85% of the respondents answered yes to the question "Do I have white privilege." I mean, assuming that all respondents understood the question (and have the same interpretation as I), that would indicate that 85% are both Caucasian and feel this gives them an unfair advantage in life. I mean, I'm Caucasian, but I'd never say that I have white priv…
/r/MensRights31/03/13 05:18 PM
3

"I knew it! I'm surrounded by assholes!"
/r/seduction29/03/13 07:03 AM
2

I'm not kidding.
/r/MensRights04/03/13 12:50 PM
7

What? Bullshit. I'm in Australia, and I've met some brilliantly nice police officers. Shining beacons of society, not overzealousness or brutallity.
/r/MensRights04/03/13 12:22 PM
38

Whoa, dude, you stepped outside and talked to people? But that's scary, man!
/r/seduction22/02/13 05:29 AM
8

If he's going to breakfast early, she's not going to think that. It's going to be clear that he's going to sit next to her. Still a perfectly good method of initiation, of course.
/r/seduction21/02/13 02:15 PM
12

It might be time to start thinking about harsher, more strict moderation policies, such as outright removing "low effort" comments, such as puns, jokes and such, regardless of how many upvotes it has at the time. I believe r/games recently developed a much stronger moderation policy to prevent it from sliding to the level of r/gaming. Completely different subject matter, of course, but it's an example of (in my opinion) a well-moderated subreddit. r/askscience would be another example of a major…
/r/seduction20/02/13 02:50 AM
7

Getting a pizza delivered is also a bitch of a thing.
/r/seduction16/02/13 09:22 AM
3

Wait, you mean I have to put effort into stuff in order to get anything out? Fuck this shit, man!
/r/seduction14/02/13 02:55 AM
3

There is no d model, because d is short for dick, a symbol of the continuing opression of the upper-class female socialites by the mining slaves/limbless breeding stock cis male scumbags.
/r/MensRights13/02/13 01:08 PM
1

The horror! :P X !
/r/MensRights13/02/13 06:14 AM
4

What? No, silly. The b indicates it's inferior to the non-penetration model, which of course is the a.
/r/MensRights13/02/13 05:55 AM
7

And it moves karma whores us all!
/r/seduction13/02/13 04:09 AM
25

OP is gonna watch a movie at his place with new girl? That's right... Isn't it?
/r/seduction07/02/13 11:18 PM
3

Hey! That's my Mobile privilage!
/r/MensRights07/02/13 11:04 PM
-6

Average privilage is clothes that fit.
/r/MensRights07/02/13 11:19 AM
14

Average privilage is clothes that fit.
/r/MensRights07/02/13 11:19 AM
2

... Which makes sense, given the culture of the Legion (that being an attempt to emulate ancient Rome). There are plenty of female NCR soldiers.
/r/MensRights30/01/13 06:05 AM
1

From the point of an outside observer, I don't know, it sounded reasonable. "Hey, wait, maybe we know the same person." And if it is, whahey, maybe you know each other in reality, gogo gadget talking point/wingman/awkward silence when it turns out you hate each other. DBSC seems a little paranoid.
/r/seduction29/01/13 07:52 PM
8

In shitness and in health!
/r/seduction29/01/13 07:48 PM
0

Pour a Nazi? Where, into what?
/r/MensRights23/01/13 09:42 AM
1

/u/alllie. There are three els. Don't be hatin' on ol' /u/allie, a blank account made six years ago and is probably now unused.
/r/MensRights23/01/13 09:42 AM
17

God damn Norwegians. Check your socialist privilege. Damn rich Euro hippies who have my money and also health insurance.
/r/MensRights23/01/13 09:38 AM
2

So? Walk in the dark until it comes back on.
/r/seduction22/01/13 08:01 AM
2

I'm in a similar boat as well, and this is exactly what I'm doing. Just say small things to random people. Sure, you might (and probably will, as I have) fuck up any conversations you make early on, but that's to be expected, you're new to this shit. An example: I was recently waiting for a train and due to some circumstances I heard this older gent talk. He sounded as if he was British, so I asked him if that was the case. Cue a conversation about how he lived in England for a while and the cla…
/r/seduction22/01/13 07:57 AM
2

Utter newbie here. I was out on New Year's Eve at a club fairly early on in the night, and during my terrible attempts at all of this guys attempted to dance with me. I'm a guy, so I'm assuming they were gay. Due to several factors (that it was physically causing me to move, childhood emotional trauma relating to homosexuality), this threw my non-existent game completely off, destroying my frame entirely. Cue me leaving the club, pissed off. The rest of the night is another story, though. How wo…
/r/seduction12/01/13 09:31 PM
2

Or, hey, the truth - You went out to meet new people. No need to throw hypothetical buddies under the bus.
/r/seduction12/01/13 12:41 PM
5

My "never happened" meter is starting to trigger...
/r/seduction12/01/13 01:02 AM
4

If you could point out that 1%, I'd much appreciate it. Too many FRs are like this these days. Have we forgotten the point of field reports? To take a step back, analyse the interactions of the night, determine what could have been done better? We don't care that this guy "[ejaculated] in her mouth and in her [vagina]". It's irrelevant. "F-close" works perfectly and doesn't sound anywhere as creepy, and also doesn't serve to glorify the close, maybe prompting one to expand on the actual techniqu…
/r/seduction12/01/13 12:59 AM
1

That's true, they are entirely different things.
/r/MensRights01/01/13 09:40 PM
1

You know, if I stop breathing, I will die. If I'm dead, my penis can't deliver semen. Ergo, oxygen is a fertility drug. Now, that is hyperbole, but it demonstrates something: Just because you need X (here erection/life) to be a father, does not make the prerequisite of X (here little blue miracle pill for the middle-aged man/air) a fertility drug/aid. The reason that Viagra is an ED drug is because it gives you a boner. Simple as that. The reason that Viagra is not a fertility drug is that it do…
/r/MensRights01/01/13 08:57 PM
2

No. Taking the pill is fixing the problem. That's what was prescribed.
/r/MensRights01/01/13 08:40 PM
1

Viagra is for ED, not fertility.
/r/MensRights01/01/13 08:37 PM
56

Tonight, actually, NYE. Joints are getting tired. Shoulder aches a bit. Too much mad dancing. Felt like stepping out to the patio because inside was an utter sausage fest. And, also, my game was going down the drain. Would have succeeded in stepping out, if it wasn't for the floor-to-ceiling windows.
/r/seduction31/12/12 05:43 PM
2

Not who you replied too, but I agree with em - having a number of degrees does not make one intelligent. Having intelligence makes one intelligent. Plenty of smart people are out there without degrees, and plenty of people have forged through degrees without smarts or critical thinking (dedication, sure, but not intelligence). Not that that's bad or anything, mind.
/r/MensRights30/12/12 09:40 AM
1

Oh, for sure, there's a difference between genuine feelings and infatuation, sure. I think we all know that. "Oneitis" doesn't describe either, really, though - it describes the situation where such feelings ("genuine" or not) are not mirrored in the other person (typically such feelings never were, but the more general case ignores the past), especially in situations where it is unlikely that they ever will be (for example, where the other party just considers you a friend, has never met you, h…
/r/seduction28/12/12 09:47 PM
2

downvote for upvote.
/r/seduction26/12/12 08:00 PM
2

I never actually used the term "better" at all, but okay. But man, you've got it all wrong. These people are treating you like garbage. Regardless if they're the most interesting people on the planet or not, that's not something you want to deal with, because it gets you fuckin' down, man. Also, it's practically impossible to recover respect from those people in the long run. There are interesting people out there, and most of them won't treat you like shit - the majority would be over the fucki…
/r/seduction26/12/12 07:56 PM
8

If it's targeted at a particular particular person - if you're targeted at a particular person - it would probably indicate oneitis. If that's the case, and especially if you've known that person for a while, you've probably struck out. It migt be time to move on. The two important things to note is that there are plenty of gals out there that any particular guy would be perfectly compatible with, and that "agressivley approaching" doesn't nessecarily mean that you're approaching with the goal o…
/r/seduction26/12/12 10:54 AM
2

Hey, I don't think the issue is you "getting one-itis over [your] living station" - it's that you're putting up with people that don't seem to respect you. I advise you to build a social group beyond these people - for starters, it will help you realise that there are other people out there, who won't treat you like shit, and secondly it'll give those you live with a demonstration that you're capable of finding people who respect you. Also, don't be afraid of moving out - there are, what, seven …
/r/seduction26/12/12 09:48 AM
0

Assume attraction, unless she obviously rejects you. She might just have confidence issues or something.
/r/seduction26/12/12 08:28 AM
7

Mathematically/logically impossible, not physically. Lists are abstract, not physical, things.
/r/seduction26/12/12 08:04 AM
0

Wait, man, we have to listen? That shit ain' Alpha, man, not one bit.
/r/seduction17/12/12 11:34 AM
1

Seduction: Challenge Mode? SCM?
/r/seduction17/12/12 11:31 AM
1

Pffft, try any night of the week. I've read that (and you could, Google's a mere few clicks away, although they tend to stress a single, canon routine, but whatever) that the "trick" is to maintain absolute confidence, maintain eye contact, be absolutley strait to it, and if it's rejected, carry on like it's no big deal (ie, converse, not like she said yes, raep is teh bad). So if you're a little nervous or get bad AA, your millage will vary (probably). Be coooool.
/r/seduction17/12/12 11:24 AM
3

So many three-second rule.
/r/seduction15/12/12 12:08 PM
12

ALPHA. AS. FUCK. I want to be related to you, take my first born daughter. No, take all my daughters. All of them.
/r/seduction15/12/12 12:04 PM
2

I don't know, demonstrating your value of time could work wonders, if not done as a brag. Like telling her (honestly) you've fitted her in between important stock trades/preforming open heart surgeries/bear wrestling/fap sessions, it doesn't sound like you're saying "Oh, yeah, I'm a stock trader/surgeon/bear wrestler/mastubator, babe, I pulll in the big bucks, check out my hoarse voice/malpractice suit collection/tombstone/hairy palm", it sounds like "well, I've got important things to do, I nee…
/r/seduction15/12/12 11:59 AM
30

And in /r/aww, his mother has made a post about their cute new kitten.
/r/seduction14/12/12 10:17 AM
1

Nonono. Out of his head. Upon his scalp.
/r/seduction14/12/12 09:57 AM
1

No, that's not the case. The idea of going out five nights a week is to get better at things. Because, while you say that being of good dress and liking yourself is enough, it really isn't. Especially if you want to be good. In sport, you can't just go out, buy the jersy, buy the shoes, tell yourself you can kick the ball, and then go out and play a grand final. You've got to practice. You've got to go out every day for ten years and get there. In academia, you can't just skim the textbook, sit …
/r/seduction12/12/12 11:13 AM
2

I raise to the power of two. My maths sucks.
/r/seduction12/12/12 10:50 AM
1

He is quite the bawss, isn't he?
/r/seduction12/12/12 10:48 AM
2

Is the pasta... Spaghetti?
/r/seduction12/12/12 08:22 AM
7

I don't get it. None of my friends offer health insurance.
/r/seduction10/12/12 06:05 AM
1

On a less circle-jerk-mocking note: Nice. What do you think of it? (Note: Any negative opinions are defined as wrong and will be purged.)
/r/MensRights05/12/12 10:52 PM
5

That's true, but it still smacks of being a bad idea. It does look like ey's just inviting people to go and spam these people with rhetoric (and let's face it, just as feminists have their own rhetorical extremists, so do we). Really, a better idea would have been to say "UT students, contact these people here: {Link}", I think.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 08:48 AM
2

Yeah, that's true, bit it's still a bad friggin' idea. You're essentially inviting the harassment of these people - And even if you aren't, it certainly looks like you're doing that.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 08:44 AM
4

Do do we do do we do do we do do
/r/MensRights05/12/12 08:41 AM
1

If you're on Linux, it'll be easier to find "youtube-dl" in your repos. It's at least in the Arch repo. (BTW, have I told you I use Arch? You should use Arch! ArchArchArchArchArchArchArchArchArchArchArch) But yeah. "youtube-dl".
/r/MensRights05/12/12 08:40 AM
22

Hey, hey, B_M doesn't discriminate. Trust me, I know. As does my therapist.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 08:36 AM
-2

What you've just done. Don't do it.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 08:34 AM
4

Whelp, time for you to learn how to approach girls waiting for a bus then.
/r/seduction30/11/12 01:07 PM
1

I just don't send many texts - barely any, really, just enough to convey the information. As CurveBall says above, if you're trying to have a conversation over text, you're doing it wrong. Just send a minimal amount, don't say anything but what you need to (which is to say, don't excuse yourself, don't apologize for sending a text, so on and so forth), and avoid being clingy. I don't really have any examples handy (because I've got an old-ass phone which doesn't thread texts, I know, woe is me),…
/r/seduction29/11/12 09:38 PM
3

Have a purpose - If you want to suggest a date, or want information, keep that in mind. Then, in the actual text and the following texts, keep it short and sweet - don't send a text unless you really need to. Heck, maybe even don't say thanks. I say this because I'm of the mind that you aught keep textual communication to a minimum with girls you have the ability to communicate with face-to-face: It (apparently) helps minimise the decay of attraction that can occur over text mediums. Of course, …
/r/seduction29/11/12 07:31 AM
19

A sauna for homosexual men.
/r/seduction29/11/12 07:18 AM
10

OP was asking about picking up women, not priests.
/r/seduction29/11/12 07:15 AM
24

Oh, man, trust me, a RRoD is a death in the family.
/r/seduction28/11/12 12:39 PM
4

Zero: Stop reading lists and stop trying to emulate "being alpha" and such shit. Sure, you might need to change who you are, you might need to alter your personality a bit. You might need to build up your confidence and self-image, your "inner game", a bit (or even a lot). So go do that. But you're not gonna be able to do that with just an inspirational quote from a 122 item list. Go outside for a jog, clear your head, enjoy yourself, approach some women or something. Get away from the computer.…
/r/seduction28/11/12 12:22 PM
2

Also, don't forget daygame and coffee/ect (instant-/mini-)dates are perfectly legit.
/r/seduction27/11/12 08:46 AM
4

Doesn't work. She's just going to assume that you're talking about the seat. Every single time. There's only one canned opening you need, especially if you're new to all this: "Hi."
/r/seduction27/11/12 08:29 AM
2

True, true. I'm not sure that the culture and viewpoint that the joke and similar breed are altogether healthy, but you're right, I suppose.
/r/seduction23/11/12 09:18 PM
1

Even so, it's still a crappy thing to say.
/r/seduction23/11/12 08:43 PM
1

Even so, it's still a crappy thing to say.
/r/seduction23/11/12 08:43 PM
3

But does a joke even need to be made? Goodwin's law, sure, but the easiest joke to make when someone explains that they are German is "What, like the Nazis?", isn't it? But you don't(/shouldn't) do that, because it's mean/stupid. Saying that women (all, or subset that flake) have ADD is similarly mean/stupid.
/r/seduction23/11/12 08:41 PM
1

What the fuck? He never said anything like that. He was overly needy, drove a woman away, and then realised he needed to stop doing that sort of shit. TL,DR: Events caused him to see a deficit in his personality, and he changed stuff. How the fuck does that mean he's clinging to the past?
/r/seduction23/11/12 01:19 PM
9

I don't get it. Why not just be direct, man?
/r/seduction23/11/12 01:04 PM
32

Embossed, raised print, oh my god it has a water mark.
/r/seduction23/11/12 01:02 PM
3

I really don't think that's the entirety of this subreddit. I hope it's not the majority. I'm certain it's not what the leaders and founders of PUA aspire for the movement to be. I don't understand your second paragraph, or it's relevance.
/r/seduction23/11/12 10:54 AM
-12

That's kind of a shitty thing to say, you know. EDIT: Okay, so saying that women are so easily distracted that "something shiny" would make them forget your existence is good now? Come on, seddit, you're better than this.
/r/seduction23/11/12 07:09 AM
4

See, people in other places (such as r/okcupid) say the exact opposite - Go for the "let's grab a coffee" as quickly as possible, though within reason. According to their theory, maintaining momentum is paramount prior to face-to-face. Which kind of makes sense, in my opinion.
/r/seduction10/11/12 01:29 AM
2

Ouch. This is why we have off-site backups in underground Swedish bunkers, man, protected by eighty-character passwords that have been tattooed to our retinas!
/r/MensRights09/11/12 07:33 AM
1

Please tell me you had backups. I need to know that.
/r/MensRights09/11/12 05:37 AM
2

It's called one-itis. You've just got to move on. If you need help, imagine her pooping. Suddenly, she's not quite so attractive, no?
/r/seduction08/11/12 01:10 PM
1

Simple. We'd all be very disappointed in you if you didn't actually go out, and hence, you've now got another reason to go out.
/r/seduction19/10/12 02:48 AM
2

Regardless if anything happens or not. Even if you chicken out and stay home, I want you to write up a report.
/r/seduction19/10/12 12:37 AM
2

No, no, nononono. They don't want to be blatantly hit on. They don't want you to go up to them on the street and grab their ass. They don't want you to wolf-whistle as they jog around the park. They don't want you to look up their skirt as they get something from the low shelf at the supermarket. And fair enough, because those things are pretty shitty things to do. I believe we call them "sexual assault." But women, like men, don't have a problem with having conversations. Provided you're outcom…
/r/seduction18/10/12 10:47 PM
27

No, you've got it backwards. It's better to die on your life than have feet on your knees.
/r/seduction18/10/12 10:21 PM
3

Duh. That's how karma works.
/r/MensRights13/10/12 04:01 AM
3

Subtitle or bust!
/r/seduction11/10/12 01:22 PM
4

"Probably", you say. I'm going to need a standard deviation and a sample size, thanks.
/r/MensRights06/10/12 10:24 AM
9

I just didn't take a shot in Melbourne, Australia. Come get it, motherfucker.
/r/seduction03/10/12 04:38 AM
18

Bitches love combat wombats, yo.
/r/seduction30/09/12 09:27 PM
2

Obligatory comment about socialism and giving things up.
/r/seduction30/09/12 12:50 PM
2

And it's a good kino opportunity, if you yourself are good with guns. Helping her into posture, so on and so forth. Of course, safety first on the range. Don't be stupid.
/r/seduction30/09/12 12:32 PM
3

What, being 72? (I jest, of course. It also occurs to me that I'd probably never say that to one's face, even in jest, but hey - that's the internet for you.)
/r/seduction26/09/12 04:23 AM
3

Great. Situps are now your punishment.
/r/seduction24/09/12 06:57 AM
3

So... She gave you the slip, eh?
/r/seduction23/09/12 06:40 AM
2

Not gonna lie, that's pretty fuckin' awesome. How did things turn out with the rest of the night?
/r/seduction23/09/12 12:08 AM
39

Alpha as fuck. (/sarcasm)
/r/seduction14/09/12 09:56 PM
0

We b gettn dewnvuts Dewnvutters b hatters I an no hatter, you an no hatter Hatters gonna hat
/r/seduction14/09/12 09:46 PM
-5

No wai! I can do w4ver I want, hatter.
/r/seduction14/09/12 05:03 AM
1

Ask her if she wants to grab a coffee or something. Doesn't matter if you do this immediatley over facebook or in person. Simple.
/r/seduction14/09/12 04:39 AM
-3

Got that force over distance, amirite! (iamrite.)
/r/seduction14/09/12 03:57 AM
1

Dude, if she's discussing previous sexual partners with you, you're all going out for drinks, and the environment is a three-person start-up rather than a two-hundred-strong box factory... I'd say she sounds pretty damn close to a sure thing. Of course, as said above, play it safe/mature. Slightly OT: I noticed that you removed the original text from the OP. Might I enquire why?
/r/seduction13/09/12 01:12 PM
1

It's not about your bodily appearance. It's about confidence. It's about how you view you, because your attitude and persona forces other people to view you as you view you. So, from the fact that people are saying 6, that probably means you aren't eight hundred pounds and three-eyed. Which is good. So the only thing you really need to work on is your self confidence. There's two ways to do this - Accept you're a baws and just suddenly have it, or chane yourself until you can accept that you're …
/r/seduction13/09/12 11:02 AM
1

Long answer: Yes.
/r/seduction13/09/12 10:41 AM
1

This, a million times. People say don't shit where you eat, and generally that's true, but there will always be situations where it can be pulled off. The trick is (probably) maintaining good communication and both parties being mature enough to not part as mortal enemies if it all goes south. Also, don't tell HR.
/r/seduction13/09/12 10:33 AM
3

Don't even consider the people around you. I've opened on public transport before (we're essentially in the same boat), and I don't care about those around me. Yes, it's a packed metro train, and everyone just heard me comment on the motto tatooed on a young woman's feet, but what do I care? I'm now talking to a young receptionist at a fitness place who has tatoos on her feet. TL,DR: Disregard chumps, get conversation.
/r/seduction12/09/12 03:59 AM
2

Googly eyes, specificially.
/r/seduction11/09/12 10:05 PM
13

(NB: This doesn't work if you are arguing with a chair.)
/r/seduction11/09/12 12:51 PM
3

Dafaq? Yoga isn't religious.
/r/seduction11/09/12 12:39 PM
1

Yeah, but, pffffffffft. You blew a room, so what? Move onto the next one, or worst case scenario, sit out a train ride with some chick staring daggers at you the whole way. There isn't only one room out there, you know. This isn't quite the case in an employment or educational setting - obviously, in situations where repeat meetings are likely, you want to go for lower risk stuff - but otherwise, talk, be burned, dust yourself off, and move to the next room.
/r/seduction09/09/12 01:15 AM
1

Please, biatch, I seddit during my six hour public commute. Next.
/r/seduction09/09/12 01:07 AM
8

You did good, kid. Suggestion? Don't have a goal. Seddit talks about outcome independence for a reason. Try not to think about things too much, just enjoy company and be enjoyable as company.
/r/seduction08/09/12 05:05 AM
1

There was a small bit of advice on here a few days ago that I've taken to, which was to keep a diary. End of the day, pull out a book, and write what happened - The people you met, the things that were said, activities, heck, even that cute cat picture you found on r/awww. Very quickly you'll develop a better memory of events, you'll discover things about yourself, and most importantly, you'll realise that your life isn't all that dull after all.
/r/seduction08/09/12 04:59 AM
3

Tell me - you say you "blow yourself out" when rejection occurs. What do you mean by that, and why does it matter? After all, it's likely you'll never see her again.
/r/seduction08/09/12 04:49 AM
3

Trolling well isn't your strong suit?
/r/seduction08/09/12 04:45 AM
4

If by "carry on", you mean "carry on into a conversation", yes, that would be a good move.
/r/seduction07/09/12 02:03 PM
2

I suppose if someone tries to interrupt you. Treat 'em like a child, essentially. Seems like a douchey move to me, but whatever.
/r/seduction07/09/12 02:45 AM
3

The pecking rule certainly has no exceptions. Never, ever, ever even kind of lean into a conversation. With anyone. Ever. Not even once. At a club and you legitimately can't hear a word she's saying? Hope you can lip read. In a hurricane and there's hair flying in front of her face? Looks like you're shit out of luck, buddy. But remember, dying in a natural disaster because you wouldn't listen to someone giving you directions to a nearby shelter is Alpha. As. Fuck.
/r/seduction07/09/12 02:43 AM
7

If you can repeat "2 mins" for roughly 3 mins, you have made great success, comrade.
/r/seduction04/09/12 09:45 AM
2

That's because you are old.
/r/seduction04/09/12 08:40 AM
1

Honestly, I'd keep MF out of the this-is-exactly-what's-going-on loop until you've known for a fair while. Having a chat about hypotheticals after the first meet might be an idea ("Would it be an issue if we ended up hooking up or something", perhaps, but you aught just improvise). Without knowing the personalities involved, if MF has actually been playing matchmaker, there probably won't be a huge problem - from my perspective, what she wanted to happen happened, right? - but people can be fick…
/r/seduction03/09/12 09:15 AM
27

Punching someone in the kidney is some pretty extreme, premeditated physical contact. Basicially an IOI!
/r/seduction03/09/12 08:53 AM
2

Man, I'm not sure if it's even that. It's like he's trying to work on fauxseduction. He's doing it wrong at every level. Heck, I'd call it trolling but for the fact he hasn't called anyone gay or insulted PUartistry as a whole yet.
/r/seduction02/09/12 11:13 PM
2

Thank you, downer Dan. Your issue is likely that you have approach anxiety. That's what people were trying to tell you in your thread. If you won't listen to others there, don't whine in other threads.
/r/seduction02/09/12 09:54 PM
1

I think das427troll has the right idea in terms of being with your mutual friend (herein MF) - if you want to sweep her off her feet, it'll be significantly easier to do without MF there. Furthermore, I'd suggest her mentioned communication kind of suggests she wants to get to know you one-on-one, rather than with MF. Regarding if it's a date or not - unless you've got a real need to define it as being one or the other, such as putting it down on your tax return, I'd suggest you not bother namin…
/r/seduction02/09/12 06:18 AM
6

The hero seddit needs, but not one that it deserves.
/r/seduction02/09/12 05:35 AM
1

Endgame for a casual is hardcore.
/r/seduction02/09/12 05:22 AM
5

It could simply mean that you're literally invisible. Are you perhaps a child psycologist who was recently shot by an ex-patient?
/r/seduction01/09/12 01:20 PM
3

Dear diary, Today, OP made a mistake. I told him that he sucks. Yeah! That'll show him, and I hope he learns his lesson. Regards, forever_and_never
/r/seduction01/09/12 12:08 PM
1

It does kind of depend how paced apart your lectures are. Are we talking two days here, or weekly? Because if they are of high frequency, you might just want to proceed with sitting next to her again and asking her if she wants to grab a coffee/sushi/fencing gear after the lecture. To be fair, that would probably work even in low-frequency classes, and would be fine if you wanted to play it a bit slower. At the end of the day it's just about getting into a conversation and then proposing activit…
/r/seduction01/09/12 11:59 AM
2

Exactly how blunt were you? Did she reply in a way that might have indicated she didn't quite get what you were saying?
/r/seduction01/09/12 11:44 AM
2

Close anyway. You loose nothing by it, and hey, you never know what might happen. Heck, at the very least, it's another number in your phone to call during the zombie apocalypse.
/r/seduction01/09/12 11:42 AM
3

It's a common joke that white people can't dance. NB: White guy here.
/r/seduction01/09/12 11:06 AM
1

"Want to share some strait wasabi?"
/r/seduction01/09/12 10:57 AM
2

<obligatory nowkiss.png comment that trivialises the entire conversation>
/r/seduction21/08/12 09:58 PM
1

Don't mix buisness with pleasure unless you're prepared to loose both.
/r/seduction20/08/12 03:10 PM
65

Checked my phone, saw you rang
/r/seduction20/08/12 02:40 PM
7

I call bullshit! You're typing, not writing.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 06:10 AM
1

Without birth control, it is also the mother of babies. Lots and lots of babies.
/r/seduction12/08/12 09:25 PM
1

Not sure if compliment... Or indirectly insulted my intelligence.
/r/MensRights11/08/12 03:51 AM
8

Don't be silly. As an Australian, I can assure you it'll be longer than that. We aren't stupid.
/r/MensRights10/08/12 12:51 PM
7

Touché.
/r/MensRights02/08/12 08:15 AM
-6

Why on Earth do you smoke in this day and age?
/r/MensRights02/08/12 05:43 AM
3

bebe13 almost certainly does not mean large amounts of LSD.
/r/MensRights29/07/12 09:27 AM
1

You don't get karma from self-posts. Not to say that OP doesn't know this, but karmawhoring on a self-post is not something that can happen.
/r/MensRights29/07/12 04:56 AM
2

Words Punish if rejected. Words What.
/r/seduction29/07/12 04:48 AM
2

Real men don't press charges.
/r/MensRights29/07/12 03:39 AM
3

Rock climbing is a hell of a lot more practical than any of your suggestions, regardless of who you are.
/r/seduction25/07/12 11:08 AM
13

So very much better. The image makes it sound like being raped is a rite of passage.
/r/MensRights18/07/12 03:33 AM
1

0.3 women - what is that, a torso and a forearm?
/r/seduction13/07/12 09:58 AM
15

Nope, that was Mandella.
/r/seduction02/07/12 11:09 AM
30

Works on r/spacedicks.
/r/seduction02/07/12 11:07 AM
1

I don't, actually. Pray, do explain please?
/r/seduction30/06/12 09:32 AM
0

Smokin'.
/r/seduction30/06/12 06:35 AM
3

More than one pasta on the menu.
/r/seduction30/06/12 06:31 AM
2

Superman?
/r/seduction30/06/12 06:16 AM
2

You can haz my salute.
/r/MensRights28/06/12 10:13 AM
1

Well, you should talk to my girlfriend, my sister, my sister's bff5ever, and quite a few of my other closer female friends.
/r/seduction28/06/12 09:00 AM
1

Trust me, doing anything is better than nothing. Indeed, most things done (I'm rolling higher education and employment into one here) are more interesting and involved than they look from the outside, and there's real room for passion and a vastly alternate viewpoint from the standard on each. And also, short-term money access.
/r/seduction27/06/12 12:24 PM
2

Just want to say - This isn't a demonstration of feminism, but rather man-hating (for which there is a better word that I can't think of right now). Although man-haters will self-describe as feminists, feminists who are not man-haters will also self-describe as feminists, and hence the identification issue.
/r/seduction27/06/12 12:20 PM
1

Provided he doesn't turn his shit around with his bare hands. That's disgusting.
/r/seduction27/06/12 12:16 PM
3

Just try not to kill each other.
/r/seduction27/06/12 07:04 AM
6

Unless they're picking up other women, note.
/r/seduction25/06/12 06:18 AM
2

But only the real one.
/r/seduction20/06/12 09:30 AM
3

Well, yes, you'd try to be.
/r/seduction15/06/12 03:10 AM
4

The fact that he makes twice as much money as I do has to do with his degree in software engineering, not his sex. You have no idea how glad I am to see this - I'm planning on going into the field myself, and it's good to know that there is job potential.
/r/MensRights06/06/12 05:18 AM
8

Be careful - A good meta joke is like a can of paint. If it goes on too long, you wind up missing the punch line, and everything just goes stale and mouldy. Wait, did I say paint? I meant can of tuna.
/r/seduction04/06/12 06:19 AM
1

Like, omg, a methodology avoiding all conformation bias! Totally, like, fact and stuff!
/r/seduction28/05/12 01:35 AM
1

Something something watching films Ocean's Erection
/r/seduction27/05/12 10:24 AM
1

Well, Ms. Hypothetical may not be. I'd argue that saying that one has a boyfriend doesn't communicate your status about having other romantic relationships. Although it is a good point.
/r/seduction26/05/12 09:40 AM
-2

So there's the disclosure. But, contrary to your attempts at falsely portraying the situation of your ex-interlocutor, your situation is not the same. Your example has nothing to do whatsoever with what we are talking here. Explain, sensei. Explain.
/r/seduction25/05/12 08:50 AM
2

Speedbumps are like people?
/r/seduction25/05/12 08:39 AM
0

disclose shit, and obtain consent. Okay. Let me tell you something. I have a girlfriend. Amazing, I know. We consider ourselves to be poly. If she was at a bar, was chatted up by some cute guy, left bar, engaged in shenanigans, I would expect to know - that is, after the fact. I would not expect her to send me a text me something along the lines of "There's this guy here, can I put his cock in my mouth?" No, she's a grown adult, and that would ruin the mood. Besides, I don't always carry my phon…
/r/seduction25/05/12 08:34 AM
-3

I never said anything along those lines. I merely noted that she may not value exclusivity as much as yourself. This does not make her less of a human being. Not every relationship in the world aligns to the way you think of relationships. Is cheating bad? Yes. Is having sex with people while already being in a relationship cheating? Not always.
/r/seduction25/05/12 08:06 AM
-6

What, you're saying that a girl who maybe doesn't value exclusivity as much is somehow less of a person? As a person who aligns with the concept of polyamoury, I say fuck you.
/r/seduction25/05/12 07:30 AM
5

but I was violently downvoted into the middle of next week. Time travel by downvotes? Impressive.
/r/seduction18/05/12 01:48 AM
3

Because the DMA is likely to use the term "worthless sluts"?
/r/seduction18/05/12 01:44 AM
1

As they say in the military, "No plan survives contact with the enemy."
/r/seduction18/05/12 01:21 AM
3

Myself also. This could be entertaining. Bites into choc-top
/r/MensRights17/05/12 06:20 AM
-1

Hey, some of us like to drink soup, and sometimes our jaws be broken and sound escapes a bit. Don't be hatin' on us broken-jaw soup-drinkers.
/r/MensRights09/05/12 03:18 AM
6

I misunderstood and am like, totally so offended. Where's my lawyer...
/r/MensRights19/04/12 08:47 AM
3

What? MSPaint doesn't use layers. It's the very definition of destructive.
/r/MensRights18/04/12 09:19 AM
1

Or even the article announcing the "win", as I chose to: http://www.norinedworkin.com/blog/2012/03/and-the-winner-is-circumcision-decision/
/r/MensRights07/03/12 06:26 AM
9

Care to explain? EDIT: Oh, right. Abortions.
/r/MensRights04/03/12 06:54 AM
1

I, too, would like to know what's going on here.
/r/MensRights03/03/12 11:03 AM
1

Nutbag, I didn't vote you either way, and I could care less about the up or downvotes that either one of us receives. It's not a justification. It's a discussion. I suggest you attempt to comprehend that before replying.
/r/MensRights03/03/12 08:41 AM
8

Actually, no. The paper is a high-level discussion of ethics and raises a valid point. Dr. Minerva and Dr. Giubilini, aught be congratulated for achieving publication in the BMJ, and you should learn how to read.
/r/MensRights02/03/12 09:52 AM
-1

Liek dis if you cri evrytiem...
/r/MensRights22/02/12 01:19 AM
0

But... Come back! I want my raisins, damnit.
/r/MensRights21/02/12 11:41 PM
1

Well, it's because I fucking love raisins. If someone denies you the things you love, would you be rude?
/r/MensRights21/02/12 11:28 PM
7

I disagree. Assuming gender is incredibly rude. You <unknown gender> pig.
/r/MensRights21/02/12 10:40 AM
10

Good afternoon, Mr. Reeves.
/r/MensRights21/02/12 10:36 AM
2

You can tell a lot about the way someone posts a Facebook screenshot.
/r/MensRights06/02/12 08:39 AM
0

Thank you for for mentioning military drafting. You've just given me a perfect litmus test for seeing if someone's a feminist or equalitist, but perhaps using the wrong term for themselves.
/r/MensRights05/02/12 06:09 AM
3

"...through a sheet with a hole in it..."
/r/MensRights25/01/12 01:04 PM
4

Seriously, all I want is an answer. Why are you intimidating my wife?
/r/MensRights25/01/12 01:03 PM
1

It's not really like reverse contingency, because there's (perhaps significant) financial risk involved.
/r/MensRights13/01/12 05:07 AM
5

Most importantly, kiddies.
/r/MensRights11/01/12 01:18 AM
9

Hey, some people just have weird fetishes. I don't think it's fair to judge.
/r/MensRights30/12/11 08:06 AM
2

A man was sued. For not. Having sex. Because health. They don't have the right idea.
/r/MensRights15/12/11 11:43 AM
1

The same weapons can be used by both sides of a war.
/r/MensRights14/12/11 09:12 AM
1

Up/down votes are not justice. They are a way to voice of opinion. And I have no idea what those acronyms mean. If you feel this forum is undesirable, why are you here?
/r/MensRights27/11/11 06:44 AM
0

It's plenty needed - Indeed, it's essential. Your commentary is not, however - There's a plenty good down-vote button next to all comments designed for this purpose. You're welcome.
/r/MensRights26/11/11 10:01 AM
-2

You forgot to hit the gym, bro! The most important part!
/r/MensRights26/11/11 09:04 AM
14

If I actually wanted to damage someone, it is not the part of my body I would choose to employ. Sounds like you need to... Glasses Harden up.
/r/MensRights12/11/11 09:11 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter