TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ChevalierAuChocolat Archive

View 1 post and 49 comments by ChevalierAuChocolat on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

I'm not sure if my comment is being misunderstood or if I am misunderstanding your comment. My point is that a lot of anti-male crusaders, who tend to be feminist, actually propagate the very "toxic masculinity" they pretend to disagree with. But instead of saying the classic "just man up pussy, no woman wants a loser beta male crybaby", they say "no woman wants a whiny man with a victim mentality". But at its core the issue remains -- men are just not allowed to show any vulnerability, unfortun…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/23 10:13 AM
1

Why?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/23 05:23 AM
0

I don't remember who said it, but someone once said "when feminists say they want a man in touch with his feelings, they mean Chris Hemsworth shedding a tear after rescuing a puppy from a burning house. Not the 5'7 chubby programmer crying because he got laid off, or because his parents died"
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/23 04:35 AM
-6

Exactly. They try so desperately to make the distinction between "whiny self-victimisation" and "vulnerability" but its so clear that they view it as one and the same. And the more they try to argue the clearer it becomes. It's just age old "toxic masculinity" justified using redditor armchair psychology speak.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/23 04:17 AM
1

Although statistical trends obviously exist, there are definitely men who love BBW, and they're not terribly rare either. However, these men tend to be on the heavier side themselves. If heavy men are not your cup of tea, then (assuming you are white) I would recommend you to get with Jamaican or Caribbean men. I've lost count of how many times I've seen lean black men with obese white women.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/23 12:13 PM
1

You did get an answer, just not the one you would have liked. No one is arguing what you think is being argued. The point here is that women shame men for having very basic human desires, not that women should have some moral duty to relieve sexually frustrated men. If you are unable to realise that there is a distinction between these two, then I'm not sure what else there is to be said.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/23 01:13 AM
13

I would certainly not rally against these gay men and demonise their sexuality.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/23 05:14 PM
23

Only feminists will try to argue against you while proving the very point you were making. Like I said. Thanks for proving my point.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/23 05:06 PM
34

It is incredibly telling that you equated men's desire to pursue relationships, with feces. I am not surprised in the least. But hey, thanks for proving my point.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/23 05:00 PM
31

Maybe because women shame and demonise men for having romantic and sexual desires? I don't know though, just a humble guess 🤔
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/23 04:49 PM
1

Yes, that too
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/23 03:34 PM
50

This is conservative boomer propaganda. The reason why Gen-Z males approach less is because it's an enormous social risk (unless you're attractive). Feminists have been very successful in their campaign to stigmatise men and their sexuality. Unless the man in question is attractive, him being anything other than an explicit asexual is seen as problematic and just one step away from rape. This was not the case previously, and this is the reason why men today are so passive in dating. Now before r…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/23 03:23 PM
4

In what way?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/23 02:35 PM
6

Hell no 💀💀💀
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/23 11:59 AM
1

I have a question for blackpillers: how does your model explain that women are against cheating, if they get attracted to men who get chosen by other women? Shouldn't them cheating just make her even more sexually attracted to him?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/23 01:47 PM
11

Well, the majority of men prefer slim women. With that being said, men have more variety in their sexual interest, so men who love BBWs absolutely exist. And they're not terribly rare.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/23 01:38 PM
1

Valid point
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/23 05:48 PM
2

I'm very sorry to hear that, I hope things get better for you
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/23 05:48 PM
2

Why not? Most of the younger generations share those views. That's why such posts get likes. Unless someone is attractive or high status, interacting with strangers is seen as highly invasive and inappropriate.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/23 04:08 PM
8

There was less opportunity to become socially awkward or develop social anxiety. You would not spend your childhood, youth, adolescense and adulthood sitting inside playing videogames. Also, socialising with new people was less demonised. Plus, there were more spaces for socialisation. The standards were also lower. Evidently, you could get laid as a below average man. Otherwise these struggling guys would not have been born.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/23 02:56 PM
1

Many blackpillers/incels, both on this forum and others, describe themselves in that exact way. Which is why I was curious. Yes, everyone hears about the "ugly guy with an amazing personality" or whatever. But the ones who people attempt to reach by saying this aren't that type and never will be. The better question is if there are any unattractive guys with shit personalities and shit everything else, who have succeeded in dating. I mean, I'm sure they exist (in very limited quantity), I just h…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/23 07:13 AM
1

Many blackpillers/incels, both on this forum and others, describe themselves in that exact way. Which is why I was curious. Yes, everyone hears about the "ugly guy with an amazing personality" or whatever. But the ones you attempt to reach by saying this aren't that type and never will be. The better question is if there are any unattractive guys with shit personalities and shit everything else, who have succeeded in dating.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/23 07:03 AM
1

And why do you think they were with them?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/23 07:00 AM
3

And if not, your question is ridiculous because of course functionally zero people are all of those things at once. Many blackpillers/incels, both on this forum and on other forums, have admitted to having all of those traits at once. Which is why I was curious
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/23 08:56 PM
1

Interesting story. Thanks for sharing
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/23 08:51 PM
2

Did you honestly read my post and think this was the best response you could come up with? Or did you just want to ask your question anyway?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/23 08:50 PM
1

While sex is not like money or wealth in every aspect, the lack of access to sexual experiences can be seen as a concern for distributive justice6 and a problem for public health since an active sex life is beneficial for people's health and well-being. There are numerous studies that show the link between active sex life and our mental and physical health.7 On the other hand, people experience negative emotional effects when being without access to sexual and romantic partners. Sexual lonelines…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/23 07:52 PM
4

Don’t just look around at all the shorter, balding, chinless, acne ridden, lazy eyed, pudgy, fashionless, squeaky voiced, dumb, boring, poor, unemployed, remarkably ordinary guys in relationships Genuine question, has anyone ever seen a man with all of those traits that is in a relationship?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/23 01:29 PM
2

...do you want a medal for being "one of the good ones"?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/23 01:32 PM
1

Of course, I do agree that they both matter. I was simply pointing out that this type of reasoning is flawed, as it goes in both directions. With that being said, I believe there is overwhelming evidence that looks weigh more than personality. For example, "good looking with bad personality" doesn't really exist -- if one is attractive, their personality will almost always be perceived as "good". Conversely, while unattractive guys who pull due to charisma do exist, they're quite rare in my expe…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/23 09:18 AM
17

I am still waiting for just one person -- yes, just one person -- who makes this argument to answer this. Are you aware that by using this exact same reasoning, we can argue that personality does not matter either? If it is true that physical/material attributes do not matter because there are too many exceptions, then it is also true that personality does not matter, as there are too many exceptions. You say there is no shortage of short, fat, ugly or broke guys pulling. And I say that there is…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/23 01:03 AM
1

You're right that there's no acceptable place for men to meet women. It's not a bug, it's a feature. It's implicitly understood that it's per default unacceptable to try to get with women ANYWHERE. Anywhere that's not OLD. But you'll sort of be given a green flag anyways if you're attractive. Women have an interest in moving all dating online, because the process of rejecting men is much more comfortable to do online than IRL. It is for this reason that they've stigmatised approaching IRL. They …
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/23 07:58 PM
–

You don't walk up to a girl and say "I just wanted to say you look beautiful". You find something in the environment to comment on and see how she reacts. But this is literally how Gen Z dates. Well, the attractive ones atleast. For those that do approach IRL, it's always "Hey you're cute can I get your snap or insta?". The actual talking is done online. It's seen as very invasive otherwise
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/23 05:21 PM
1

Interesting theory. Although I personally believe that it's much simpler: that this was initiated by women/feminists. It's a much more comfortable and smooth process when she gets to reject men online, where she can either block them or just not swipe on them. IRL there is always the risk of things becoming quite uncomfortable.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/23 03:33 PM
–

What it boils down to is that women have been successful in their campaign of stigmatising approaching. There is currently no IRL place where it's okay to get to know women. It's just that if you're sufficiently attractive, you're given a green flag to go ahead with it anyways. Otherwise, there's a very high risk it will be seen as harassment. It is for this reason most dating is done online nowdays. It has nothing to do with self-victimisation and everything to do with the risk-to-reward ratio.…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/23 07:51 AM
1

I'm not sure if you know this, but some low IQ, drug-using, poverty-living, toothless, drunken, unemployed, mentally unstable violent thug has more reproductive success than the average healthy citizen. No really, these types sire a lot of kids statistically speaking. So it seems like women aren't doing a good job at selecting for the fittest. There's really just one trait that's being majorly sexually selected against by women, and that's neurodivergence. Physical unattractiveness comes second.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/23 11:42 AM
8

I'm reading these comments and coming to the conclusion that bluepill advice is by neurotypicals for neurotypicals. People who don't really struggle with dating to begin with.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/23 10:07 AM
4

I could say the same but reversed: people who say that below average men are partnered up en masse do not touch grass. While I do see plenty of average and above average men that are partnered, I rarely see below average men with visible flaws that are partnered. I do however see below average women coupled up.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/23 10:01 AM
2

I'm not sure if this is bait, but there is currently no "survival of the fittest" that's being enacted upon people.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/23 09:51 AM
1

You're right that there's no place for men to meet women. It's not a bug, it's a feature. It's implicitly understood that it's per default unacceptable to try to get with women ANYWHERE that's not OLD. But you'll sort of be given a green flag anyways if you're attractive. Women have an interest in moving all dating online, because the process of rejecting men is much more comfortable to do online than IRL. It is for this reason that they've stigmatized approaching IRL. They absolutely don't want…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/23 09:31 AM
1

They complain about different things. Men complain about a lack of options, women complain about a lack of quality.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/23 06:44 AM
2

good post op ive always laughed when manosphere opponents say "get a high paying job" as dating advice. no matter how you rationalise it the implication is that women are prostitutes who you should pay them for sex. i mean ok i get why manospherians would think that... but its the bluepillers lack of awareness of what they're saying thats making me lmao.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/23 08:30 AM
1

wait what? i thought it was because he was having conflicts with the directors because he wanted it to be more true to the source material... thats not at all the same as saying he was cancelled for being too nerdy. have i missed something here?
/r/AllPillDebate03/07/23 08:42 PM
1

Why?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/23 12:15 PM
1

Why
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/23 07:33 AM
1

That's what I'm wondering too tbh... It's possible
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/23 05:53 AM
2

Can anyone explain this weird phenomenon to me? When I want to have a wank, most girls I find online who post sexual content just seem to be very mid. Like, mid in the strictest sense. But when its some random girl i see in a supermarket or social media she is absolutely gorgeous. Even the top earners on OF are not as hot as that. Do hot girls have too much pride to post themselves sexually online? I genuinely have no idea. Its weird because I figure they could make bank doing it.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/23 05:17 AM
2

Yeah I am of that opinion. surely you yourself as a woman would cringe a bit if some short, chubby nerdy guy acted all dominant and masculine around you?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/23 05:49 PM
10

its a bit difficult to explain, but i'll try: if you're truly a masculine guy (high T, bearded, athletic, tall, extroverted etc) then you can absolutely be fully masculine because society will permit it. most will love you for it, some might dislike you for it, but you'll sorta be given a pass and green light to go ahead. but if your nature is unmasculine (low T, pubic hair beard, chubby/pudgy, short, shy etc) then you're gonna be demonized for acting masculine. you'll be universally disliked an…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/23 04:39 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter