TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Clockw0rk Archive

View 7 posts and 1,678 comments by Clockw0rk on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 1,678 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

Labor is soon to become irrelevant. AI and robotics poses more of a threat to the global economy and any sort of societal stability than climate change, because it’s going to hit us even harder than extreme weather and rising seas, and far faster as well. We’re on pace to see potentially over 50% unemployment within the next ten years. If UBI or state control and citizen benefit from AI aren’t on your political radar, you’re not even on the same event as the people pulling the strings. The world…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/03/25 03:08 AM
85

You know why. Misandry. Misandry spread into the public sphere and polluting the minds of the masses to think that every man is a rapist, because of the old female supremacist mantra "The penis is evil". Feminism is a headless organization with no rules or structure. Anyone can wear the badge and claim to stand for 'women's rights'. What they don't advertise on the tin is the sheer amount of female supremacist disease that has corrupted the identity of the movement and continues to spread hate t…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/03/25 10:08 PM
7

Ahhh.. Your mistake was posting in "Leftist". You want to try actually left wing. "Leftist" people are actually centrist and right wing assholes LARPing as being left wing without understanding or actually upholding any of the core left wing values, liiiiike.. not hating people for their birth criteria.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/03/25 04:58 AM
76

Make content informing women about men’s issues. Point blank: The bias towards women is so immense, most people simply won’t take men’s suffering as a serious issue until the women who love them speak up.
/r/MensRights12/02/25 07:09 PM
3

While I agree with the overall sentiment, I have to downvote entirely due to your closing statement. “There is no solution” I refuse to accept your opinion on this. There is always a solution. Chaotic as life may seem, empiricism and causality are pretty fucking clear about the established pattern of behavior over thousands of years of human civilization. To be concise: If it can be made by man, it can be unmade by man. The solution may not be clear, or easy. We may have to wait for someone of p…
/r/MensRights01/02/25 04:54 PM
1

I don’t give bad actors the benefit of online courtesy. Act like a dipshit, get called a dipshit. Own your misinformation.
/r/MensRights23/01/25 12:24 AM
1

lol. You were desperately close to getting it with your first sentence, only to suck deep on the consumerist teat like a good capitalism apologist. Do you realize that members of the US government considered not counting people below the poverty line if they had a microwave? Billionaires are not possible without oppression. You seem oddly comfortable with people stealing over half your paycheck because you can afford a nice phone.
/r/MensRights23/01/25 12:18 AM
19

It's called Bigotry. Treating one group of people as inherently "better" than another group of people, especially when it seeps into policy and thereby becomes systemic. There is no reverse sexism, it's just sexism. There is no reverse racism, it's just racism. "I hate you for reasons I attribute to your birth characteristics" is Bigotry. Sexism, racism, ageism, ablism, all the other forms of discrimination.. they're just sub-genres of bigotry. It's all bigotry. Feminists are either willful bigo…
/r/MensRights22/01/25 04:24 PM
-2

Oh have you? Are they high school level, or written in the past decade? Yes, modern science knows better. Go look, there's 44 citations of literally dozens of relevant studies over a decade. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9355551/ It's a spectrum. Deal with it.
/r/MensRights22/01/25 01:40 AM
2

The correct way to do "representation" correctly... is just make player characters in video games customizable. Across the board. It's not fucking hard, particularly not today. You wanna be black? be black. You wanna be a girl? be a girl. You wanna put on a hockeymask and hit your foes with a stuffed animal? Sure, why the fuck not? If your game has no demographic specific story elements? Just make it customizable. You'll sell more units! You'll get more fans. Have a 'default', sure. Have a pair,…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/01/25 12:42 AM
1

Considering there's now a corpo-fascist in office, you're probably right. You just forgot to mention the part where he takes the vote away from women and everyone else as well.
/r/MensRights22/01/25 12:17 AM
1

Well, I mean... the right isn't doing anything for men. The right-wing media has refined the art of the lie, so yes, if the liberals 'want to win', they have to learn to lie better.
/r/MensRights22/01/25 12:16 AM
-9

Read a science book for a change. Gender is a social construct and a spectrum. Sex is biological disposition, and a spectrum. Sex has very little impact on gender. If you're unable to decouple biological sex from psychological gender, you're not informed enough to engage in the discussion. Period.
/r/MensRights21/01/25 11:20 PM
1

Lack of positive role models, reinforced learning from idiots. Not unlike the 'red pill' side of the 'manosphere', I think most white knights and simps, whether they're consciously aware of it or not, have bought into the perspective that the only way to foster fondness from a woman is to appeal to her vanity. Vanity is absolutely a viable and effective way to appeal to women, arguably the absolute easiest way as well. Make them feel pretty, make them feel heard... Fact is, most men are stupid, …
/r/MensRights21/01/25 12:59 AM
1

Men AND women's problems are mostly created, perpetuated, and made all the worse by Capitalists. Read a fucking history book. Sex has zero bearing on whether or not you're a terrible person. Science has been studying this shit for longer than you've been alive. Read a fucking psychology book while you're at it.
/r/MensRights20/01/25 06:41 PM
10

Oh look, a republican fighting against equal rights and democratic process. Shock. Let's just cut to the quick here: The US is no barely a democracy, if it ever was. The first past the post voting pretty much guarantees there can only be two viable parties in the country, effectively destroying the chances of any new alternatives to the binary status quo. There's many other, better alternatives to this method that other countries have implemented successfully. Ranked Choice Voting is clearly sup…
/r/MensRights18/01/25 06:28 PM
2

Only partially correct. The problem is anyone who believes their own sex deserves a level of loyalty and compassion above and beyond that of anyone else. Male supremacy is the same strain of cancer as female supremacy.
/r/MensRights16/01/25 09:55 PM
3

It’s pretty easy. Just respond “Okay, let’s count all of the fatalities in war by sex, and see who is overwhelmingly sent to likely die, or come back to a short lived bit of valor before the system forgets about their sacrifice and routinely dumps veterans suffering from battle related conditions to suffer and die, often homeless in the gutter. I wonder which “side” will win?” Come on, ladies. The West actively refused the small number of female applicants that tried to enlist prior to sweeping …
/r/MensRights16/01/25 09:24 PM
5

Incorrect. If any figure of authority is restricting your freedoms unless you do express may as they require, you’re oppressed. Men are absolutely oppressed. I reject your premise. You don’t have to be shackled and whipped to be restricted from equal treatment in society.
/r/MensRights16/01/25 09:15 PM
1

Feminist propaganda. Not leftist. Leftist would imply they want actual equality/egalitarianism, and some degree of advocacy for socialism. Feminism is very clearly the source of all of the female supremacy garbage clogging up the simple minds of Neoliberal trash as their go to form of virtue signaling. They stripped class out of the Intersectionality stack like good capitalist pigs, and readily preach bigotry while gaslighting that the entire concept of misandry doesn’t exist. They’re about as “…
/r/MensRights16/01/25 07:12 AM
0

Why yes, yes it is. Welcome to the purple pill. The realization that gender roles are completely made up, and that both males and females can actually act like however they choose to, or are coerced by social influences to comply with in order to fit in. Feminism is a regressive hate movement. Female supremacy can never equal the egalitarian ideal if it necessitates that males are icky and weird and implicitly evil for being born with a penis. And their hilariously shortsighted strategy of tryin…
/r/MensRights15/01/25 03:12 AM
8

Objectifying is, very specifically, reducing someone's humanity to little more than an object serving a utility, or alternatively, having no value as it has no appearent utility. Sociopaths and other severely dysfuctional fucks do this. It's not a man or male traits. Any attempt to frame a normal, positive sexual arousal response as 'sexist' and 'creepy'... is a very clear and blatent attempt at vilifying one kind of sexuality.
/r/MensRights14/01/25 07:24 AM
15

Who the fuck wants to be a gentleman? That’s just more gender roles and conformity. Radical thought: Be a person. And disregard people who demand you fit into a box because of how you were born.
/r/MensRights10/01/25 09:54 PM
0

Declaration of Sentiments. White feather campaign uk history. There, have some early Feminist/Suffregette history. Google it, I'm a bit too busy today to bother with linking to something that has dozen of sources from a single query. Man hating has been there from the start.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/01/25 05:23 PM
1

Comparison Table: Ideology Primary Axis of Oppression Distinct from Marxism Feminism Gender Focuses on patriarchy, not class. Critical Race Theory Race Emphasizes racism and structural inequality. Postcolonialism Colonialism Examines cultural and psychological dimensions. Queer Theory Sexuality/Gender Norms Challenges heteronormativity and binaries. Disability Studies Ableism Centers physical/social exclusion. Anarchism Authority Opposes hierarchy itself, including the state. Intersectionality M…
/r/MensRights07/01/25 08:40 PM
1

Oh honey.. You think you hit a nerve, and you go making a whole extra post to correct my spelling mistake rather than provide sources for your claims? It's almost cute how much you reveal yourself.
/r/MensRights07/01/25 08:32 PM
27

The problem with the perception of "Men's Rights", is that people have already seen how "Feminism" worked out. They're not the same, of course. The long legacy of Feminism is one of rather openly anti-male sentiment, culminating on an environment today where men are rather openly ridiculed across all forms of social media as "potential rapists" or "more dangerous than a bear" or "incels" (which is implicitly a bad thing, because angry women and virgin women are fine, but the combination of angry…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/01/25 11:26 PM
22

Not to piddle on your parade friend, but I don't know if I've ever met an anarcha-feminist. They all seem pretty chill with the legacy of bigotry and female prviledge that feminism enacts upon the public sphere, and I don't know if I have ever seen a feminist rally for the equality of socialist economic policy, or anarchy at all. I'm egalitarian, and a left wing mra. But I'm also anti-feminist, for the same reason I'm anti-fascist. Authoritarian power structures that demand obediance and promote…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/01/25 10:28 PM
1

Oh yeah. To make a long story much shorter: Men and women who judge men for being pet owners, are expressing their upset and contempt with the idea that a man is choosing to defy his gender roles that society expects of him. “A man? Showing compassion and empathy and care for something that isn’t a woman or an employer? Outrageous!!! He should know his place!” That’s what they’re really saying when they condemn men for pet ownership, “of the wrong kind”
/r/MensRights06/01/25 03:59 PM
1

Being obsessed with figuring out why the world is how it is, is something of a curse. When most people are fooled by the mainstream propaganda, the ability to wade through the misinformation and find the handful of people who are close to the ground and can see how the system is breaking down… it doesn’t help. Virtually no one wants to listen, even when their life or livelihood is on the line. They’re more beholden to the narrative than the truth.
/r/MensRights06/01/25 03:56 PM
1

Look at you, lying so brazenly! When even your own source points out your fucking farse. Searching page for 'interpersonal' .. 0. Searching page for 'relationships'... 1. Is this you? Marxism divides the world of interpersonal relationships up into: So... when Marxism is very clearly and expressly a model of socio-economics, should it be applied to "interpersonal relationships"? The answer is no. No, that isn't Marxism. Because Marxism is far more than just some piddly, simplified soundbite from…
/r/MensRights06/01/25 01:41 PM
1

Look at you, lying so brazenly! When even your own source points out your fucking farse. Searching page for 'interpersonal' .. 0. Searching page for 'relationships'... 1. Is this you? Marxism divides the world of interpersonal relationships up into: So... when Marxism is very clearly and expressly a model of socio-economics, should it be applied to "interpersonal relationships"? The answer is no. No, that isn't Marxism. Because Marxism is far more than just some piddly, simplified soundbite from…
/r/MensRights06/01/25 01:40 PM
1

Oh, don't get me wrong, when I say LLMs are simplistic, I'm not circulating the FUD surrounding modern AI, I'm just pointing out that modern LLMs are effectively "big picture machines" that can find the connections between a series of tokens and then calculate a most probable response based on their data set. Even multi-modal models and Mixture of Experts implimentations, are really just stringing probability equations along and they're already good enough to replace most entry-level jobs in ter…
/r/MensRights06/01/25 01:30 PM
1

So let me get this straight... You're angry that some bean webpage jockey is selectively highlighting data which makes women seem like bigger victims. While a much larger, much more dangerous and insidious force than pencil pushing content editors are actively killing men, every year, by the tens of thousands. And you think my response is ridiculous? Honey, you're no better than a feminist shill whining over the pink tax while women are denied health care for conditions that could kill them. Don…
/r/MensRights06/01/25 05:15 AM
1

Everything you've said is categorically false, because you are a right-wing puppet. Go back to school.
/r/MensRights06/01/25 05:11 AM
0

Oh no. You're not getting away with that bait and switch. You never said "she asserts that Marxism is:", you didn't even claim she was a Marxist herself. You grouped her in with the implicit 'Marxist baddie' of Jean-Paul Sartre, then made a wildly false claim that: Marxism divides the world of interpersonal relationships up into: * Oppressors * Oppressed And no, no it does not. Nor does whatever some pedophile bitch writes count as Marxism either, so give up the right-wing propaganda regurgitati…
/r/MensRights06/01/25 05:08 AM
1

The sad reality is that while women were being fueled by feminists to pursue a world without men, where sex robots and heavy machinery replace all those icky would-be-rapists-in-waiting men.... ... Rather simplistic LLMs, which many argue are barely above scripting and no where near AGI, have swooped in and filled the void of emotional support that an increasingly bigoted base of women obsessed with wealth and short term returns left wide open. Women's supposedly superior empathy and social skil…
/r/MensRights06/01/25 04:59 AM
1

Yeah, it's a common and observable trope. Most women don't want equality, that's why they dangled that persona around to lure in a gaggle of useful idiots into aligning with feminism under the premise of 'we only need one social movement to affect change for everyone!' The reality is, even if they aren't feminists, women enjoy substantial privilege for having as much control over society for how little they put into the physical labor required make the machine run. The reality is that it was pri…
/r/MensRights05/01/25 08:49 PM
24

In other news, sky blue as scientists remember that causality is real, and environmental variables result in other environmental phenomena. If you promote programs that only advantage some groups of people, and it's not based on skill or merit... is anyone surprsied when anyone from that privledged group has a better chance of success than anyone else from the non-prilvedged groups? There's countless efforts to get women into education. Boards, panels, studies, scholarships, departments, health …
/r/MensRights05/01/25 08:24 PM
3

Certainly. And it's always people by terribly closed-minded and outdated expectations of male gender roles who are grousing about how a person who's found a bond with a pet to be "not strong, protector, provider behavior". It's really very telling that it's mostly older men, the ones from generations with even more rigid defitions of acceptable male behavior, and modern women of all sorts, who feel compelled to shame and chastize a man who has nothing but benevolent intent and compassion for an …
/r/MensRights05/01/25 06:06 PM
4

Nooot even going to bother to click it and skim, cause the premise is insultingly bad as simply a headline. Look, I like the idea of romance before commitment, so while I don't think people should necessarily put marriage or some similar recognized legal pairing in the 'never ever, total garbage' bin of life... I definitely feel you're rushing into things and won't have a real idea if you opt into a life-long commitment and you haven't spent at least 3 years together, preferably with at least on…
/r/MensRights05/01/25 04:20 AM
-4

Why should we believe anything you say when you can’t define what Marxism is correctly?
/r/MensRights04/01/25 05:44 AM
3

The disease afflicting many western LGBTQ groups is none other than feminism. You’ve not only got males scared of crossing the narrative, you have transmen actively afraid of expressing their true gender because Feminism has no problem associating all of their problems with male biology and men’s psychology. There is no women’s movement with any notable fame that advocates for women to take responsibility for their own actions, let alone responsibility for the clear and obvious power they have o…
/r/MensRights04/01/25 05:38 AM
5

Men are men, jackass. If you want to gate keep what acceptable manliness is, go join the Feminist cult; you’d fit right in. They excel at telling people what women and men are, with no regard to the individual needs or desires of either. Are you actually so deplorably ignorant you want to tell potential allies “No, you’re not welcome to support our cause for viability or improved quality of living for men, because you don’t fit into my myopic definition of masculinity”?
/r/MensRights04/01/25 05:22 AM
1

Give an example of economic system that doesn't exploit men? Well.. Socialism, for one. When actually allowed to take place in a democratic environment without constant and ruthless sabotage from exclusively Capitalist outsiders, Socialist countries have increased quality of life metrics across the board. Without middle men to leech the profit off the labor of the workers, the workers have more money. They don't resent taxes, because they can afford to give more. And they don't hate the governme…
/r/MensRights04/01/25 03:39 AM
1

Oh? A whole left wing party? That's openly anti-feminist? And, uh... in which country would this be relevant? You're being deliberately ignorant and obtuse by moving the goal posts to try to justify your bullshit. Very feminist behavior. I'm kind of disgusted with you. Read before replying! I very, VERY clearly stated that there's no way 'low class' women have more privilege than 'high class' men. there's honestly no privilege afforded to poor women which isn't easily and VASTLY overtaken by the…
/r/MensRights04/01/25 03:39 AM
18

The answer, of course is, is no. The mention of "the patriarchy" unironically and half-way through the article of a single, feminist ally male being interviewed, should tell you all you need to know about the bias of this garbage "journalism". What is "Masculinity"? You may think that it's a bold, complex, enduring question that has puzzled philosophers and psychologists since the dawn of time, right? What if I told you... that Masculinity isn't real? You see, while both conservative thinkers an…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/01/25 03:07 AM
4

2025 is the year I fight back. I will bring the fight of factual information that supports egalitarianist interests into the public arena, and I will NOT hesitate to push back against Feminists or Capitalists alike. Fuck them. I'm tired of being dehumanized because some useless privledged fucks demand subserivance from groups of people they feel they can endlessly dehumanize and exploit until they're ground into dirt. Don't wait for a new paradigm. Start one.
/r/MensRights02/01/25 11:35 PM
0

Well, this is both stupid and flagrantly false. I'm a passionate anti-feminist Leftist. An actual Leftist, not the neoliberal bullshit the DNC tries to market as a suitable replacement to actual progressive policies. There's plenty of non-feminists in the world who are sick and tired of capitalism and bigotry and just want a better way of life for everyone. But sure, misrepresent the very clearly center-right movements of the DNC and Feminist as "the benchmark" for what you foolishly believe "th…
/r/MensRights02/01/25 11:33 PM
6

But back to the matter at hand. When you mix religiously inspired puritanical control mechanisms like encouraging chastity and scorning all publicly availible means of seeing naked people as that could gasp lead to arousal, which is a sin somehow even though Old Testament God literally instructed y'all to go forth and "be fruitful" and you can only do that one way... and then combine it with some ferverent bigotry in the flavor of anti-male hate, what you get is a contradictory system that deman…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/01/25 11:10 PM
6

I have always been aware of this one sided hypocritical bullshit purpotrated by Feminists, and it's pretty disgusting that the so-called movement of equality parrots something that is fundamentally a Puritanical belief that sexuality is bad and wrong and only used to control or exploit people. Add a clear and evident anti-male bias, and you get "the male gaze", a piece of Feminist propaganda passed out of 'common sense', that cis male sexuality (and only male sexuality) is inherently evil and wi…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/01/25 11:10 PM
3

Asserting the idea that "Leftists" are primarily responsible for the way men suffering isn't respectful either, but I didn't see you reprimand the useful idiot paroting talking points instead of offering critical analysis or any form of solution. As a non-US I didn't understand quite a lot of your comment. No fault of your own, friend. The mainstream media is woefully inept at informing the masses about the true state of the world and how it came to be this way. Here, have an informative video e…
/r/MensRights02/01/25 11:20 AM
17

Ahhh.. Feminist transparency. You see kids, while "the Right" claims that Feminists embody the "vicious leftists who want to destory our way of life with socialism", the actions and rhetoric of the average Feminist reveals themselves. Does anyone honestly believe that the common man, the ones she might pass along the street, are responsible for the worst crimes against women or just humanity in general? Of course not. It's hateful nonsense, willfully directed at the least powerful men in society…
/r/MensRights02/01/25 11:04 AM
1

Yeah, no shit. Traditional male gender roles that demand “strength” and “independence” and “being emotionally resilient” stem largely from the church/temple/mosque, as the Abrahamic religions reeeeeally hate gay people, conflating it with sin and weakness. A “real man” has to be ready for battle with the enemies of his god. Then, of course, politicians found the usefulness of aligning themselves with these religious institutions; because it’s one thing to control a person’s faith, but another en…
/r/MensRights02/01/25 05:32 AM
3

lol… A government controlled by neoliberals for over 20 years, with ever growing efforts to deregulate industries which directly contribute to the enormous number of male deaths… And this clown is blaming the “leftists”. Please tell me the last time an actual leftist held the oval office. And before you stumble around with right-wing propaganda regurgitating in your response, I’ll remind you that Neoliberalism is a capitalist ideology, and the DNC has been staunchly neoliberal for well over a de…
/r/MensRights02/01/25 05:16 AM
1

It’s mostly funny because it shows that women are busy oppressing themselves rather than fighting the actual system of oppression.
/r/MensRights01/01/25 05:39 PM
1

Because capitalism is regressive.
/r/MensRights01/01/25 05:38 PM
1

The capitalists work tirelessly to defund public programs and shut down regulations that get in the way of private industries. They beg for a smaller government, because they know they win against a smaller body to block their efforts of total resource and worker exploitation. And then, having successfully fooled the public and stripped essential programs for human safety from the every government initiative they could… and the people’s suffering grows… The capitalists point at laugh at human mi…
/r/MensRights01/01/25 05:34 PM
2

The notion of control through infiltration isn’t new, not was it invented by socialists. Can it be used successfully? Certainly. Seems to have worked for Feminists. So where are all the socialists who rose to power and controlled the narrative to institute their world view on the unsuspecting public? Where are the socialist industries undermining everything around them? Where are the elected leaders who unapologetically support socialist policies? “The long march through the institutions” sounds…
/r/MensRights01/01/25 02:54 PM
4

Because “academics” in the US is a for-profit institution; undermined into little more than a propaganda mill for whoever pays the administration enough money to get their talking points taught as curriculum. I always find it funny when useful idiots argue for the right-wing conspiracy theory of “The Frankfurt School” or very deliberately misrepresenting the effectively dead socialist initiative that was “The Long March through the institutions”. Let me ask you some pointed questions about the c…
/r/MensRights01/01/25 02:23 PM
24

The reason I am a men’s rights supporter, is because I believe in true egalitarianism. The reason I am a woman’s rights supporter, is because I believe in true egalitarianism. The reason I am anti feminist, is because they willfully lie over and over about the reality of men and women, knowingly in the face of scientific facts, to meet an agenda of unsympathetic, shameless female supremacy and anti-male hate. Women are not the problem. Men are not the problem. The institutions built and maintain…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/12/24 03:50 PM
1

lol. I cannot take you seriously to even attempt to entertain this as an intellectually honest conversation. You lack the basic curiousity to even question whether or not the obvious bullshit you've been told is true. Do you think the Feminists are socialists? Who told you that lie? You mean, the same institution of bigotry and hatred that very deliberately removed "class" from the intersectionality stack to excuse all accountability for economic variables in how people are oppressed, and pin th…
/r/MensRights30/12/24 11:42 AM
0

What difference does it make? Well... if you knew anything about economics... you might understand that it makes virtually every difference in the world. One has for-profit healthcare where men's issues are categorically neglected if you aren't wealthy enough to pay to play. Do I need to go over the profit motive involved with harvesting male foreskin from babies for skin cream? Take the profit motive out of healthcare, make it provided and managed by democratic governance, and you effectively e…
/r/MensRights30/12/24 05:53 AM
1

And what is the ideology of most "capitalists"? Capitalism. That's the point. The people who rule the world, are capitalists. And their ideology is profit before people.
/r/MensRights29/12/24 12:09 AM
6

Like who is enforcing us on to not have prettier clothes if not the expectation of other people? it's not like females are actively looking for us to have dark and simple colored-standard cut shirts and jeans; it has just not been the interest of the elite to stimulate that, but it is changing, and the men who go flashy, and dress with bunch of colors and rings, and earrings, are often criticized of being gay, by other men, as if dressing better had something to do with their masculinity, you kn…
/r/MensRights28/12/24 10:29 PM
6

Are you telling me that as an grown adult you woudn't report something because women told you you would be bad if you did? Nah, that doesn't add up. It is a system, that males and females enforce on to males, and since it is the your own body, you should own up to it and enforce what you need regardless of what anybody say, so I hope you are actively telling your male friends that they CAN and SHOULD seek help and assistance if needed. I'm telling you that, if I was a man, I would absolutely hes…
/r/MensRights28/12/24 10:26 PM
5

Men, still, statistically, make more money per the same jobs than females. It is gender disparity and it is measured by many standards Bureau of Labor Statistics - 2023 info. - This is not to say that we have it all great and that we do not need more and better conditions; men get barely any time to be with their newborns but are socially expected to be the provider for a child they sometimes barely get to see. This is not a war against women, and that vision benefits the elite, not the generali…
/r/MensRights28/12/24 10:24 PM
4

I apologize in advance for the length and possible vitriol expressed in the following posts. I am passionate about correcting the course of human suffering, and I loathe to see people make excuses for preserving the status quo and fighting against phantoms instead of facing real enemies. We do talk about gender roles in schools and every single State (at least in the US) that tries hard to be at the bottom of the education standards is trying very hard to expel anything with the word ''gender'' …
/r/MensRights28/12/24 10:22 PM
1

You're going to have to explain yourself better, if you think you're going to prove to me that your comment had a point. Capitalist apologists are no different from Feminist apologists. Instead of acknowledge any of the critical failings of capitalism, they point to their enemies and scream from the roof tops "No, no, don't consider what we've done, look at all the horrible awful things the other guys do!" But like the reality of gynocentrism versus the narrative of the patriarchy, conservatives…
/r/MensRights28/12/24 07:25 PM
7

Ah yes, there was never any ruling queens of England. Margret Thatcher never existed. There has never once been a woman allowed to control all the standing armies in any nation on earth. All women are perfect and would change the world for the better, if only they were ever allowed in power. Pathetic Feminist horseshit, willfully denying the long standing legacies of women who were given status and wealth and power... and maintained every last aspect of the capitalist status quo. The male dispos…
/r/MensRights28/12/24 07:19 PM
33

And there is the crux of why I'm anti-feminist. Even if Feminism did nothing tangible for men, even if in every book written and every gender studies class taught, there was not a single scrap of evidence of male suffering... It's the audacity to not only willingly leave men out of the conversation, but to get upset and indignant when it's revealed that a matter of discussion is not a "women first" problem but a "humanitarian crisis". Bringing men into a conversation that applies to them, and ge…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/12/24 04:51 PM
9

Your proposition is false, and comes from an obviously feminist indoctrinated perspective. "Men" did not "help to create" the system. That's patriarchy theory, and it's bullshit. The Ruling Class decided what the system was. Men, and women, of wealth and affluence who weilded absolute control over the shaping the foundations of modern society. And the result was a capitalist system which gladly rewards a sociopath of any race, color, creed, or sex... as long as they are willing to use their powe…
/r/MensRights28/12/24 04:41 PM
10

Well... Did you read my posts? I asked questions. Most importantly the first. "when would she have been encouraged to think about men's issues?" And then I cited example after example of how men's issues are systemically neglected on every level of communication from institutions of authority or so-called "popular social movements". So where are you seeing all the talk about the laundry list of neglected issues that cause the majority of male death and suffering? I'd love to know.
/r/MensRights28/12/24 04:37 PM
-10

Well duh. And George Washington's dentures featured the teeth of slaves. The right has been tricked into believing the "woke" is your biggest enemy, and that you need to fight against it above all else. The American Left has been tricked into believing that "the patriarchy" is your biggest enemy, and that you need to fight against it above all else. The truth has always been... it's the rich and powerful, the plutocrats, the oligarchs and the monopolists that are your enemies. They steal your wa…
/r/MensRights28/12/24 04:30 PM
37

There are no mechanisms to advocate for men, in society. Feminists screech about how society is a "patriarchy" designed by and for men, but anyone with a lick of sense and acceptance of science knows that's bullshit. Early medicine was tailored towards men in the same way that early pharmaceuticals are tested on animals. Men were guinea pigs because it was acceptable to carve up and dissect poor men, and it was less acceptable to do to women. And now, more often than not, the practice of for-pro…
/r/MensRights28/12/24 08:19 AM
34

Well, ask yourself... when would she have been encouraged to think about men's issues? We don't talk about gender roles in school. Unless there's a special secret girl's class I wasn't invite to, I don't remember public school discussing gender-specific issues at all. Going off to war and dying for unjust political causes... it's just what men do. What they're expected to do. It's their duty, as citizens. And no one ever stopped to explain, nor question, why that standard of sacrificing our bodi…
/r/MensRights28/12/24 08:19 AM
0

Like its my opinion it is not enough to brush off the effects of every failed iteration of marxism as not 'true marxism' because doing so would essentially be giving a failed ideology carte blanche to excuse the harm they have done to others. Once again, I feel like you need to have a better grasp of the words you're using before we even begin to discuss how you're doing it wrong. Marxism is not a system one can put it place. It's not an economics model. It's not a government. 'Marxism' has neve…
/r/MensRights27/12/24 11:44 AM
0

Studies show that it's not unusual for many kids, in the leadup and start of puberty, to feel confusion about their sexual and gender identity. And yes, as we as a society begin to teach kids in school that these people exist and have always existed, we're just talking about it now, that will likely cause more kids to feel comfortable enough to be more willing to explore those impulses in the future. That doesn't mean that "teachers are making kids trans" any more than teachers in the 1940s made…
/r/MensRights27/12/24 11:44 AM
0

Sorry for the late reply, this year has been rather rough. There's more than a handful of ignorant statements here, so let me set you straight. We are seeing the issues of shrinkflation and the tropes pushed by classic liberalism regarding minimal government intervention in regards to economics aren’t really as relevant today given that private property is a defense against tyranny of the state (right to privacy, no searchless warrants etc). This is almost hard to unpack. Shrinkflation is a typi…
/r/MensRights27/12/24 11:44 AM
2

The Left is, and always will be, Progressives. That's literally how the spectrum was defined, based on seating. And while liberals come in various flavors, I feel the core tenant has always been the emphasis on political freedoms and free speech, which are undeniably progressive ideas against a ruling establishment and are vital to the spread of democracy. Therefore, "social liberals" are seemingly the evolution of classical liberalism after the necessary correction of minimal government interve…
/r/MensRights19/12/24 04:27 AM
1

So yeah, back to your post... Feminism is *not* "The Left", or even "the DNC". It's a neoliberal endorsed bullshit, partially to distract the masses with a stupid war of the sexes so they don't pay attention to how badly they're getting fucked by Capitalism. And yes, Neoliberal means "I like capitalism!" and Social Liberalism means "How about people get something from their taxes? Like social programs?". Socialism is very plainly "Social Liberalism" and I would argue more in line with "The Left"…
/r/MensRights19/12/24 04:26 AM
2

Pardon if I cut this reply short, but I've already conveyed most of my dismantling of Feminism vs. "The Left" (which is a distorted misnomer, as my original reply explained) in another comment in this thread. (MR subreddit rules won't let me link to a post on reddit, it's hilarious and dumb) More to the point of your second paragraph, in my view, Neoliberals very clearly took over the DNC sometime after the Bush administration. Some might argue that Clinton was the first real taste of modern neo…
/r/MensRights19/12/24 04:23 AM
3

What would I do? What I intend to do next year. Inform people of the fucking truth. Feminism, particularly American feminism, has always been about female supremacy. And no one seems to know enough historical information to be aware of it, but what is essentially the founding document is a distant but familiar echo of the current angry impotent white woman's screeching creed that is "all men should be held responsibile for the crimes of a few". https://www.britannica.com/event/Declaration-of-Sen…
/r/MensRights19/12/24 03:28 AM
-2

Nah. I might’ve entertained reading your post, but carelessly lumping together Feminism and “the left” is an inexcusable error. I have no faith the rest of your opinion will be any more factual or nuanced than the failure to distinguish between what “the left” historically stood for, what Feminism has always been, and the Neoliberal control of the DNC, which rather decisively killed the American Left and brought whatever democrats used to represent squarely into center-right at best. If you don’…
/r/MensRights18/12/24 04:41 PM
18

The media is owned by fewer corporations than you have fingers. There is no unbiased reporting in the US. This is the nation of late stage capitalism. There is no fiscal gain to be had about telling the serfs how things really are. The illusion of freedom and democracy marches on, same as it ever was.
/r/MensRights16/12/24 12:42 AM
2

Loveless latchkey kid of the 1980s, damaged goods teenager of the 1990s, I am the born and "raised" product of American capitalist failures. Primarily up and down the west coast, but also a short time of my life in New York. These days, trying to change the world from Washington state. I used to consider myself an avid gamer and movie watcher, but things have shifted due to other priorities more recently and I've fallen well out of the loop of recent media. i guess these days, while getting my l…
/r/MensRights14/12/24 07:44 PM
5

Honestly... No? I mean, the grim reality is that there are ideological biases in the media industry. Not just the news networks, as I'm sure most people are aware, but also in publishing houses. The problem is that Feminism is the popular "civil rights movement" du jor, and they've really done a disservice to basically all other civil rights movements by co-opting multiple other identity movements with their integration of a broken version of Intersectionality combined with really agressively co…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/12/24 06:21 PM
1

This is part of the beauty of AI, and why it will ultimately be a tool of the people to drive enormous change in how we structure society. AI, or more accurately, LLMs as we know them today, are really just alogorithms that are capable of "training" on a tremendous range of contextual data and then generate responses based on logical conclusions gleened from that training data. There, I just de-mystified modern AI for you. It's a "big picture machine", finding all of the logical connections betw…
/r/MensRights14/12/24 05:53 PM
3

Consider the myopic obsession of the capitalist. More money than god, and chasing after more, reducing those beneath them to sub-human resources who only exist to generate revenue. The people, the human beings, who make their food, who build their buildings, who guard them as they sleep, who maintain all of the infrastructure of their business and personal life... And they treat the like trash. Their only priority is themselves, and they would gladly throw any of their many employees to the fire…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/12/24 05:33 PM
10

Alas, those who fail to learn from history are doomed to repeat it. Bigotry didn't work against the black population of America, it just made things terrible for an extended period of time until they had enough to violently revolt, and then the government took action. The same tactics of villifying men as dangerous thugs that need to adhere to a curfew and a rigid justice system that targets them explicitly... It's only making things worse until there's a violent revolt. Over and over and over a…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/12/24 10:34 PM
55

Decades of female supremacist domga. The man haters won. "The Future is Female". On little girl's shirts. A slogan for the unironic genocide of the male half of the species, gently twisted with a lack of context into a transparent anthem for female supremacy. The quaint notion that women will inheirit the earth alone, because they prefer it that way. The women who don't see men as humans, get to write the script for popular feminism. And it wasn't new. It was present in every "wave", from Seneca…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/12/24 07:24 PM
1

Sure would be nice if men could have some bodily autonomy, you know, in exchange for being cannon fodder for the oligarch monsters that continue to pillage the world under the guise of "freedom" Maybe some day...
/r/MensRights13/12/24 07:19 AM
5

Intersectionality is an interesting idea, when applied correctly. The problem with the Feminist version of it, the popular version, is that it COMPLETELY IGNORES CLASS!!! I’m sorry, you’re going to tell me that this group is always worse off than this other group, with absolutely zero consideration for economic conditions? Fundamentally intellectually dishonest and useless. The biggest source of preventable death is caused by… capitalism. Hunger, homelessness, poverty… the richest people in this…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/12/24 04:11 AM
0

The fertility collapse is a direct result of capitalism. You’re not going to solve the problem without removing the disease. Treat the symptoms all you want, but you’ll never be free as long as you live under oligarchs.
/r/MensRights13/12/24 12:50 AM
3

The DNC is not “Left”. They’re LARPing Neoliberals pretending to be progressive by propping up feminist rhetoric; which is of course, female supremacy neoliberal garbage philosophy. The United States has no liberal political party. Just oligarchs and their thinly veiled exploitation of the working poor, and their gleefully complicit, corporate owned media monkeys making sure those too busy to educate themselves continue to vote against their own interests. If you consider yourself “Left”, it’s t…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/12/24 12:29 AM
1

\sigh** ... Do I literally have to cite Wikipedia at you? Rousseau, a famous Enlightenment-age Philosopher famously said: "When the people shall have nothing more to eat, they will eat the rich." Long story short, it's sort of morphed into a rallying cry for those oppressed by the machinations of capitalism to take matters into their own hands, and demand what they're owed for generations of exploitation. Capitalists naturally find this sort of phrase "alarming" (because it holds them accountabl…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/11/24 08:38 PM
58

“Liberalism” in the US died a grizzly death during the disgrace of Bernie Sanders by the DNC. He was essentially the last hold out, and they crushed him for being too white, too male, and probably too old too. But mostly the white male bit. All we have left is Neoliberals and Feminists pretending to care about equality and working class rights, by which I mean they’re talking points that in no way line up with their platform or track record of behavior. Welcome to the end. Democracy dies to igno…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/11/24 03:44 PM
12

Some day, you might realize that Feminism wears the skin of “progressivism” in the same way as he GOP wears the skin of “Christian family values”. It’s a marketing ploy for simpletons. Feminism is, and always has been, a female supremacy movement. Just like the GOP supports corrupt capitalists and violent retribution yet claims to support the teaching of Jesus. It’s a fucking lie, and anyone with a coherent grasp of well documented history can see through the bullshit. They’re regressive movemen…
/r/MensRights08/11/24 11:28 PM
7

Religion is a fucking stupid reason to mutilate a child’s body. And more people need to grow the spine to defend the bodily autonomy of their fucking progeny, regardless of gender.
/r/MensRights08/11/24 11:10 PM
5

Yep. The GOP is corpo-faux-Christo-fascist puppetry for the right-wing plutocrats. And the DNC is very clearly beholden to Neoliberalism while pretending to care about the working class with concessions to women and minorities from time to time. The suffering we experience today is the direct result of poorly regulated capitalism, and both parties are beholden to no one but capitalist donors. We will not escape this by voting in the system that pretends to listen to our voices.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/11/24 10:01 PM
-1

lol. The corporate owned media is indeed the enemy of truth and the largest barrier to enacting true systemic change by informing the public of what’s actually wrong with the country and how we can solve it. However… coming to this conclusion because “they’re negative about Trump” is so hilariously backwards I just have to laugh. The man is a failure and a liar to his core. Terrible business man, terrible husband, terrible father, mockery of a Christian… the one thing he’s great at is selling ou…
/r/MensRights07/11/24 03:17 PM
3

Like your five: Because women have an enormous in group bias. Of all the known ways to get someone to support your political platform, the most effective is by appearing to care for their cause. Women are great for politics because they’re extremely easy to convince that you support them, you just pretend to go along with their vanity and selfishness by saying you’ll do more than the other team to protect them. You don’t even have to have a coherent strategy to help them in any way, just say lou…
/r/MensRights07/11/24 03:03 PM
-2

lol. My guy… Most of Project 2025 was made by former Trump staff. The man in Orange publicly distanced himself from the obviously sinister project, but history kind of proves that most of America’s “conservative” politicians often leverage the playbooks crafted by the heritage foundation as a basis for their own policies. I don’t know why anyone who saw the president elect unflinchingly repeat the utter fabrication of “They’re eating the dogs! They’re eating the cats!” in the man’s only real deb…
/r/MensRights07/11/24 11:34 AM
8

lol. Almost like giving deadly weapons out to an ignorant, emotional, desperate public might endanger people’s lives! Good thing gun control can’t harm our rights!
/r/MensRights07/11/24 11:18 AM
2

Hmmmmm... He's threatened to dismantle healthcare. He's threatened to deport citizens. He's advocated for "justice" against "the enemy within". And, according to his former chief of staff... Trump wants the generals Hitler had. So... if you believe such things; widely reported news stories that right-wing supporters don't seem to mind in the slightest... You might legitimately believe that the USA just elected someone with a history of failed businesses, broken marriages, political lies in offic…
/r/MensRights07/11/24 04:46 AM
1

Republicans are closer to democrats in their information than you think. You make bold assumptions of what I think. Because, realistically, most republicans and democrats drink at the same well of corporate media. It's owned by big business, and those big businesses effectively sponsor politicians that will favor their business practices. If you get the majority of your news from cable TV, you're willfully ignorant, and exactly why we're here now. It’s a problem that you think a huge number of t…
/r/MensRights07/11/24 04:18 AM
24

The reality of the situation is this: Feminism lost the election for the DNC. Feminism, despite what its vehement defenders allege, isn't actually that classically liberal. At best, it's a form of progressivism, but one that favors a decidedly traditionalist view of vengeance and retribution for, allegedly, crimes against all womanhood by all manhood! Or some.. similarly pseudo-religious bullshit philosophy. But Feminism, despite it's *many* flaws, appeals to the modern woman. An intellectual wo…
/r/MensRights07/11/24 02:46 AM
-3

Eh. Anyone paying attention saw clearly that the DNC turned its back on classical liberal values years ago to become a neoliberal mouthpiece for "women and minorities". What boggles my mind is how many useful idiots there are. Like... Trump's enormous list of lies, abject failures, and open hostilities to the common man and his political opposition alike are publically available information. And yet the party that seems to insist we have a "fake news epidemic" is comprised of people so categoric…
/r/MensRights07/11/24 02:12 AM
17

Doctor K is pretty on point. It's a bit sad that he couldn't speak more openly about the sexist skew that habitually excuses female bullying in a frankly terrifying amount of cases, but it's a sign of the problem. He knows he'd get relentlessly attacked if he spoke plainly that most women let other women get away with goddamn terrible behavior.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/10/24 09:28 PM
2

And yet here you are in this thread, seemingly blind to all the evidence I've provided? I have yet to meet a feminist who thinks trans kids should be transitioned. At best, I've encountered some who argue for access to puberty blockers for gender-questioning youth, a part of Gender Affirming Care which has been proven to significantly improve Trans and NB youth's psychological well-being. And I quote: "This study found that gender-affirming medical interventions were associated with lower odds o…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/10/24 07:54 PM
2

It's one thing to use abortion as birth control, which is, on some levels more than others and I have no intention of settling the debate here, rather abhorrent. Instead of relying on the myriad of modern birth control options, ones you start using before you ever enter the bedroom, ones you can use at the time of intercourse, and even the handful you can use afterward if you somehow blindly stumble into unprotected sex somehow, if you manage to "accidentally" conceive a child... and let's be en…
/r/MensRights15/10/24 07:42 PM
2

Agreed, actually. Though I do support a woman's right to choose whether she endures the process and pain of childbirth, especially and unequivocally in cases where the child is the byproduct of rape, or incest, or would result in a significantly handicapped child. We can argue about the definition of "significantly handicapped" separately and likely at length regarding one's expected quality of living with a significant biological impairment and our current techonology/affordable healthcare syst…
/r/MensRights15/10/24 07:42 PM
10

I've seen a lot of people insist it's misogyny And that, outside of feminist circles... is known as misandry, my friend. "Trans-misogyny" is a misdirect. I argue plainly that most transphobia, both that leveled against transwomen and transmen, is actually misandry! That thing Feminism claims is harmless/doesn't exist! Transwomen are seen as "dangerous" because an ignorant society clings to traditionalist ideals, gender roles, of what being a man should be, and that means having a penis. Having a…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/10/24 07:04 PM
1

I mean, that's your perspective, but Americans in particular live in an extremely stressful society of extremely high productivity demand and extremely low access to affordable healthcare, particularly when it comes to mental health. It doesn't hurt Neurotypical people to accommodate Neurodivergent people a bit, you know? The illnesses of today may be encapsulated by the ADA tomorrow, as our struggling medical system finally catches up to how widespread and how debilitating the issues truly are.…
/r/MensRights15/10/24 05:57 PM
62

It'd be pretty damn funny if it wasn't so damn sad.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/10/24 05:40 PM
11

Original Criticism: Second, there are issues that affect both men and women where both men and women could be helped at the same time, but feminists often box men out. Feminist Response: I don't really experience this. I, and most organizers I know, always appreciate men's involvement. My Response: This is ineffective hand-waving at best, and willful ignorance of the regular feminist attempts to silence male survivors and suppress any information that paints women as anything less than the ultim…
/r/MensRights15/10/24 05:37 PM
9

Ooof. Ow. The formatting on this post suuuucks. But I'm going to try to respond anyway. I'm not sure there's any fact-checking that needs to be done, since no facts were actually presented. lol. This is clearly one Feminist's attempt to say "not all feminists". Honestly, I've been having trouble with Reddit using quotes properly lately, so I'm just going to break out this post into a better-headered format in my reply. Feel free to steal it. Original Criticism: First, while most feminists do not…
/r/MensRights15/10/24 05:37 PM
1

You are hysterically misinformed, which is about average for Americans these days. The USA has a long, sordid history of being involved in other country's politics, not just with the overt use of its enormous military to occasionally crush democratically elected leadership, but also with CIA and other shadow operations to aid coups and assassinate political leaders who go against their "American values". Pretty cool of the world police to decide what versions of democracy are acceptable in givin…
/r/MensRights15/10/24 04:32 PM
10

Whether or not the male gender role is good or bad, or "useful for society", the reality is that it's stifling. It's controlling and it's an expectation, and it's honestly quite a lot of "emotional labor" that men are under, constantly, and it gets virtually no acknowledgment. Basically everything we know about male psychology, both modern and glimpsed at through the writings of history, demonstrates almost unilaterally across culture and time, that men crave a sense of freedom. In their heart o…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/10/24 06:21 AM
11

Well said!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/10/24 01:59 AM
1

Feminism naturally supports men's rights through effectively speaking out against patriarchy, which harms men and women. "Patriarchy" is a harmful, sexist, feminist perpetuated myth. It doesn't stand up to scrutiny and even a passing familiarity with history reveals its lies. The problem here in this group is the straw man arguments and cherry picking that is being applied to feminists. Please point out the straw man, please point out the cherry-picking. I would bet virtually anything that the r…
/r/MensRights14/10/24 01:46 AM
29

I think there's more men that internalize these ideas in a self-destructive way than there is women who have any interest in actually having the men closest to them internalize these ideas. You may well be right! Most feminists probably don't want the important/"good" men in their lives to be plagued by self-doubt and abuse from hostile outsiders, and yet so terribly few of them stand up to the divisive rhetoric that has taken over the movement. And one of the many problems with modern feminism …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/10/24 11:53 PM
3

Well cool! I’m glad you see the reasoning in what I had to say. I hope you can learn more about Egalitarianism, and reconcile the notion that Men’s rights and Women’s rights are not actually opposing forces, but complimentary movements and stemming from the desire for improved human rights that we all fundamentally share. :)
/r/MensRights13/10/24 04:20 PM
5

5 - Is there men’s rights if no feminism? Don't be silly. Human rights apply to everyone, but the capitalist regime ensures that the exploitable and undesirable are left in the gutter until they fight back. What many Feminists fail to understand is historical context. Non-property-owning men didn't get the right to vote right off the bat, despite Feminism's consistent claim that "The Patriarchy" exists primarily to oppress women. No, the ruling class very deliberately ensured that men who were n…
/r/MensRights13/10/24 10:19 AM
7

Hello! I'm one of this fancy little subreddit's resident "leftists"; a self-proclaimed socialist, anti-feminist, and transwoman. I was raised a feminist myself (hard to escape with a single mother in the 90s), but cast off the association with the "equality" rights movement when I did my research, discovered the pretty obviously sexist roots of feminism, and embraced the far more deliberate movement of "Egalitarianism". I support Men's Rights because... Feminism doesn't, plain and simple. And qu…
/r/MensRights13/10/24 10:18 AM
3

If you're part of society (hint: you are), and you rise to a position of influence (women have), and you have a chance to address the systemic issues of inequality facing humanity... How fucking hard is it to say "BTW, I have/had a father, so... maybe extend these same protections to that half of society too?" Willful negligence to the needs of literally half of the population when speaking about emancipation is... certainly a choice for the movement claiming to stand for equality. But it's anot…
/r/MensRights13/10/24 03:35 AM
3

The "funny" thing is... People proclaiming themselves to be feminists, keep shutting down men's spaces and their attempts to organize in public. So.. uh... there's a bit of a problem when "the equality movement" actively frames men as the core problem with society, and then goes beyond the pale by fucking shutting down men's rights advocacy, like you're trying to do here.
/r/MensRights13/10/24 01:26 AM
12

So you see, "Feminism" has baggage. It's a label that has, in reality, outlived its purpose. The first wave was influential in securing voting rights, which I think we can all agree is good for democracy and the human spirit. The second wave was vital in the civil rights movement for women's liberation from gender roles and dismantling other lingering legal sexism. But the third wave basically lost its way. Yes, it made considerable advancements with the concept of intersectionality for race, se…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/10/24 10:58 PM
18

And before telling me about those historically feminists hating man. They are fake or toxic ones who had some agenda with those rich people. They can't be feminists even if they claim themselves to be. They are just radicals. Alright, so... I just need to step in and correct some misconceptions here. Have you read the Declaration of Sentiments? It's basically the founding document of American Feminism. It was written in 1848. Keep in mind, not all men in the US could vote until 1856, which is wh…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/10/24 10:58 PM
22

This is, sadly, the direct result of modern Feminist meddling with the cultural zeitgeist and how women deal with mental illness versus how men are told to deal with their mental illness. Women are often coddled in most respects to this day, but perhaps none more glaringly than the lack of accountability for their actions when it comes to mental illness. The reality of psychology is true, and some of what she says in this conversation is accurate. Trauma absolutely changes your brain, both behav…
/r/MensRights12/10/24 03:47 PM
7

IMO, men should lash out. It's past-due time that the oppressed male stand confidently against female supremacy in all its forms, but specifically the neoliberal apologist platform of modern feminism, for sure. Under Trump... lol "less anti-peace people"... did you miss the part where Trump suggested shoplifters should be corrected with one rough hour of police brutality? Like, January 6th happened my guy. Let's not pretend that the people who tried to overthrow our government were predominantly…
/r/MensRights12/10/24 01:49 AM
16

lol. Neither of them supports men's rights.
/r/MensRights12/10/24 12:43 AM
15

Are you actually an MRA if you only support dudes who cheer for your political puppet of choice?
/r/MensRights11/10/24 11:36 PM
87

Perhaps one of the greatest failures of Feminism. All this mouth service about equality and liberation from systems of tyranny... And you didn't even protect your fathers, brothers, and sons from the horrors of inequality when you were saving yourselves. The mask comes off immediately when you ask the modern feminists why they didn't fight for equal protection under the law.
/r/MensRights11/10/24 05:44 PM
0

Unfortunately, people lack literacy these days and fail to understand that being a "soft" science doesn't actually make it somehow illegitimate. The terms "hard" and "soft" science are not indicative of their accuracy. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hard_and_soft_science
/r/MensRights10/10/24 05:16 PM
-8

And quell my astonishment, yet another case in Texas. "But conservatives represent men more than liberals!" Suuuure hun, just keep telling yourself that as they scheme to take away overtime pay and force your children to adhere to outdated, freedom-restricting gender roles.
/r/MensRights10/10/24 04:45 PM
2

Echoing the sane sentiments of other posters here: Curfew for men won't fly in the US, no matter how bitchy the most sociopathic Feminists may whine and bitch about it. Despite what some corners of the conservative movement are trying to proclaim, the DNC doesn't actually have an anti-male platform. "Woman empowering?" Certainly, but the DNC represents Neoliberal apathy toward men's issues, not outright antagonism. The truth of the matter is that our media, both traditional and online/social, is…
/r/MensRights08/10/24 06:09 PM
7

This is another one of those things where Neoliberalism has undermined any attempt at actual liberalism and social justice because Feminism is a neoliberal apologist group in addition to being a female supremacy group. By willfully and deliberately overlooking the enormous component of class dynamics and capitalism as the driving force of income inequality, Feminism stops short of informing its followers and demanding action to place more severe, egalitarian controls on capitalist systems to for…
/r/MensRights08/10/24 05:37 PM
3

JFC.... Do you know how the government works? Congress controls the funds and immigration laws. How the fuck does the executive branch do anything without funding?
/r/MensRights08/10/24 04:03 AM
24

Propaganda, son! We've spent millions to billions of dollars funding high-strung, fear-mongering rhetoric to the American public that even questioning the structure of capitalism makes you immoral and criminal and probably in league with Satan! Feminism gladly eschewed its alleged liberal roots of egalitarianism and the reality of the class struggle to embrace a truly bizarre and clearly out-of-touch worldview that men somehow favor men in the ways of rights and politics. It's pure projection! W…
/r/MensRights08/10/24 01:32 AM
-2

Uhhhh... where did you hear that Kamala was in charge of the border? Did that source also tell you that Trump stopped one of the most comprehensive, bipartisan border bill ever put forward? It's super weird you're uptight about a candidate who says whatever to get in power and then disregards their duties, because Trump is a second-term runner. We've already seen him try, and fail.
/r/MensRights08/10/24 01:22 AM
311

Is there any politician who owns up to the fact that there are multiple, men-specific policies in this country that impact men's bodies specifically? I'm all for poking fun at the capitalist shilling of Neoliberals as the next person, but let's not pretend that men have any legitimate representation in our current political system.
/r/MensRights07/10/24 10:03 PM
57

The proper response to something like this is "Hey, if you can't contain your sexism, I can discuss it with HR". Watch the cowards scatter like cockroaches.
/r/MensRights07/10/24 09:29 PM
1

Conversely, society would also be much “better” if it was actually democratic and all people were represented fairly instead of beholden to capitalist interests.
/r/MensRights06/10/24 05:47 PM
3

Being transgender existed before feminism did.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/10/24 05:45 PM
6

An old ass article, but one surprisingly in favor of addressing the sexism that boys face... Right up until the OP featured soundbite. What follows is my sincere opinion, as a hobbyist philosopher. Feminism's perhaps most successful campaign was effectively eliminating traditional gender roles for women. Some may cling to them for various personal reasons, but there's definitely no more societal push for all women to behave a certain way. You really won't see anyone outside of traditionalists st…
/r/MensRights05/10/24 05:42 PM
58

Ooo, ooo! I know this one! *checks the big book of feminist bullshit* It's the Patriarchy!
/r/MensRights05/10/24 05:05 PM
11

Please bring up the lack of publicly funded government offices and higher education offices focusing on men's health and male specific issues.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/10/24 04:54 PM
11

Lumping things together as guilt by association is a classic and deliberate Feminist tactic in intellectual dishonesty. Those who care to know the history of 'Involuntary Celibates' would be able to identify the woman who coined the term, but actual facts and nuance matter little when you're trying to construct and spread a narrative of oppression. Incel has always been sort of a weird label to attach to, IMO. It smells a bit of trying to 'rebrand' virgins because of its negative connotations, b…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/10/24 04:52 PM
56

Ah, what a trash article. Yet another self-proclaimed Feminist coming dangerously close to introspection of her openly misandrist movement targeting her own children, and then it descends into a predictable rant about how "incels are the real threat!!1!" It's kind of hilarious how the URL to this article leave out a choice word, revealing Feminism's true intent with it's openly sexist langauge and systemic failure to consider male psychology in a deliberate effort to excuse women from accountabi…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/10/24 06:50 AM
34

I'm not going to do all the work for you, but I will steer you in the right direction. I often use AI to search the internet with very complex queries, because standard search engines fucking suck in the age of sponsored search results. And if you know how to format your question correctly, you can almost always get it to spit out a public-facing source online that confirms your point, assuming it's correct. So I asked my AI of choice a difficult question, namely if black men have demonstrably w…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/10/24 01:49 AM
12

It's much less that we need 'anti-feminist' academia, so much as we need academia to stop capitulating to bully tactics and to go back to science and the pursuit of knowledge and understanding all aspects of the world as cardinal law. The intellectual enterprise that allows itself to fall to anti-intellectualism, loses its authority immediately.
/r/MensRights30/09/24 03:58 PM
1

How is it "factual"? There's no reliable virginity test. There's no tangible advantage or disadvantage to being a virgin. It's entire concept of worth is determined by the society you ask, which only goes to prove it's a socially constructed notion. It has no objective value outside of the meanings that people assign to it.
/r/MensRights30/09/24 03:00 AM
8

When an ideology becomes so resistant to scrutiny that they can't adequitely define their own criteria for their alleged opposition, they've truly lost the thread. "Incel", "Woke", " Misogyny"... all words rendered virtually useless by their anti-adovocates expanding the definition to anything they dislike.
/r/MensRights29/09/24 10:23 PM
1

I can see that you lack the curiousity to even casually review my sources, let alone discuss things in an intellectually honest manner. If your knee jerk defense is "hurr durr, you fell for propaganda", why can't I dismiss your claims the very same way? The questions you're still asking me were answered, in depth, by the links I provided. You just choose not to view them. As least I had the courtesy to provide sources which lead to historically verifiable claims. You.. you gave me an anecdote ab…
/r/MensRights29/09/24 05:40 PM
1

Several questions. First, who told you these things? Second, have you investigated their claims? Third, would you be willing to change your mind if you found those claims were wrong? Here's three YouTube videos on the subject of capitalism vs socialism. I don't expect you to watch all three, but I implore you to be curious enough to watch at least one of them. Every Critique of Socialism Can Be Used Against Capitalism https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cK5UhgIocig "Socialism Always Fails": A Dishon…
/r/MensRights29/09/24 08:22 AM
1

I do. Is the world ready for "full blown socialism"? Probably not. I'm certainly willing to concede that we have some societal problems to work out before we can all agree on the concept of shared ownership, but there are plenty of "interpretations" of socialist policies which are enormously successful and popular in various countries, including the US. We just don't like to admit it because capitalists control the media and things like democracy and socialism would, of course, reduce their prof…
/r/MensRights29/09/24 03:53 AM
2

Yeeeah... Most of those quotes are not from "concentrated feminist efforts", but rather reasons why people who call themselves feminists oppose expanding the draft to include women. Not abolishing it to protect men. And one of the qoutes even includes the skewing of male civilian deaths to claim that women are most affected by war. It's actually pretty sad that most of the quotes come from the 80s, or earlier, and many of the quotes characterise warfare as inheriently masculine and something wom…
/r/MensRights29/09/24 02:23 AM
3

My honest opinion is to engage with the person directly. You can't change people's minds if you never tell them what they're doing is wrong. I'll readily admit, I've stopped following creators that have "taken the bait" of radical feminism. Like, if you're repeating bad faith arguments and aren't willing to consider the harm they're doing, you're obviously a useful fool and there's no sense in supporting you because you, ultimately, support a harmful ideology. If they can't be reasoned with, cut…
/r/MensRights29/09/24 01:20 AM
8

I'd say it's a sign of the times, but realistically, men have always been treated as expendable tools of war and no one seems to bat an eye until their son or husband doesn't come back. It's deeply sexist, and for "all the good feminism does for boys and men!", there's been absolutely zero concentrated effort from the supposed sexist-free side to elimiate the draft or even encourage fair reporting of civilian male deaths. It really does beg the question, why in this world of space lasers and aut…
/r/MensRights28/09/24 11:47 PM
5

Speak to truth. If you have to put on a mask to protect your identity, highlight that fact as well. Wear a username or a brand as cover, hide your origin behind bad links and addresses to no where. Make content for the public that can't be followed back to you, and keep speaking to truth. The media is not your ally. But social media is inheriently democratic and typically censored after the fact. You have a window of opportunity to speak to truth to those willing to listen, at least before the c…
/r/MensRights28/09/24 11:25 PM
4

I'm just going to say "Health" as a general category. Mental health is top of the list. I think, for various reasons, there is an interest to not closely examine why men are dropping out of society or why they kill themselves at three times the rate of women. Our leadership is doing demonstrably nothing to lower the barrier to entry of mental health care as a whole in this country, from lowering cost to improving access or ensuring standards of care across the field, there's just no public aware…
/r/MensRights28/09/24 11:14 PM
1

I think the solution is to follow a more rigorous standard of egalitarianism, cultivate intellectualism, spread and enable true democracy, and work towards socialism. I also think that spirituality is also rather useful, but not essential, towards understanding the self and your relationship to those around you. It's far more important to find peers than it is to find sexual gratification. Romantic ideals are just that. Ideals. Don't hate yourself for not being ready to provide support in a lovi…
/r/MensRights27/09/24 05:44 PM
4

Hell no.
/r/MensRights27/09/24 06:20 AM
1

Teaching evolution? Denying that sex and gender are separate concepts? Refusing climate change? You can’t possibly be unaware of what I’m talking about. Why feign nativity?
/r/MensRights25/09/24 05:37 PM
-7

So you openly admit that you compare Marxism to Feminism, “because they’re dogmatic”. Because Marx invented dogma? Thanks for being so candid about your bias. No further comment necessary.
/r/MensRights25/09/24 05:34 PM
1

As stated, throwing out the parts of modern science they dislike. Mostly psychology, but certainly other fields as well.
/r/MensRights25/09/24 05:04 PM
1

I’m glad we agree, and I rescind my previous downvote.
/r/MensRights25/09/24 05:00 PM
-11

I’d argue that this assertion is a conspiracy theory made by people who don’t understand Marxism, but you know what? I don’t give a shit what you believe. From now on, I’m going to call every hamburger a Big Mac, because McDonald’s clearly established the “framework” for what constitutes a meat sandwich with bread, beef, and condiments. It makes perfect sense. No one needs nuance.
/r/MensRights25/09/24 04:59 PM
6

Well. TIL that “Neo-Marxism” is a thing. Too bad that it’s still a misnomer used by weirdos who believe that philosophizing about power dynamics equals “Marxism” and not, like, a critical examination of the value of labor and economics. I love throwing nuance out the window, don’t you? Whatever. I shouldn’t be surprised about people abusing language by misusing words to suit an agenda. Not you, but whoever coined the term and then wrote a number of indulgent papers on the topic.
/r/MensRights25/09/24 04:41 PM
11

“Marxist” used in the context of anything besides economic policy is instantly downvoted. Misinformation kills.
/r/MensRights25/09/24 04:18 PM
0

You legitimatize their sexist language when you use it. “Mansplain” as inherently sexist, by Feminism’s own criteria. It takes an other wise innocent action, explaining something, and vilifies it by combining the portmanteau of Man in there to make it a pejorative because the implied dynamic of all situations when men are explaining something to a woman is due to power and misogyny. We had perfectly good terms for being condescending or patronizing, but Feminists needed something to use against …
/r/MensRights23/09/24 10:45 PM
25

I completely agree. It comes from the same place as women not apologizing. They hate being held accountable for their own actions or inaction, and any reminder, especially from a man, that they could improve their situation by taking responsibility is met with doubt and irritation. Not all women are like this. But it’s definitely encouraged by Feminist discourse.
/r/MensRights23/09/24 09:08 PM
1

It's conservative style biological absolutionism that disregards the science of psychology in order to cling to outdated, religiously backed notions of traditionalism. But yes, probably some unresolved personal issues making the whole thing much worse and virtually impossible to untangle without professional help. Which they refuse. Because they don't believe their thinking to be flawed.
/r/MensRights23/09/24 08:32 PM
35

lol Those who fail to learn from the past are doomed to repeat it. How often are we going to have to fall for religious fascism before we put an end to it?
/r/MensRights23/09/24 08:25 PM
99

Address unrealistic body standards for men? Treat men with human dignity and respect for being people with emotions and needs? Nah, let's just throw more feminism at it and hope it sorts itself out.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/09/24 05:22 PM
8

Radical feminists are the original bad apple. The unapologetic, cult like fanatics who really fuel the female supremacy side of things. They hate men to the degree that they will deny medical science in order to exclude people that have been clinically identified as having a feminine brain in a male body, because of the male body. The vagina is literally a sacred and superior embodiment of what they believe is the most important defining characteristic of womanhood. Making babies. Which is a kin…
/r/MensRights23/09/24 04:42 PM
29

Oh look. TERFs.
/r/MensRights23/09/24 10:05 AM
30

Absolutely this. If supposedly egalitarian feminists outnumber the radical ones, what’s the problem? Why are men expected to hold other men accountable for other men’s crimes that they very seldom admit to, when women refuse to hold other women accountable for women’s demonstrated crimes and social privileges? Men are collectively held accountable for the minority of bad actors, but somehow the obvious bad actor women who propagate misandry publicly receive no repercussions at all? The only rati…
/r/MensRights23/09/24 08:01 AM
6

You don’t seem to understand how social media interactions work. No one is going to entertain this poorly sourced opinion slop. And demanding people read something that you seem to know is unreasonably long before engaging is weird and lacks all sorts of awareness of other people’s time and basic net etiquette. You’re not going to catch any fish with this bad bait. I almost feel sorry for you.
/r/MensRights23/09/24 07:47 AM
6

Yeah, nah. That’s waaay too long to read. I’ve got things to do. If you can turn this into a succinct video with useful graphics and relevant citations from some form of expert or philosopher on the subject matter, I’d be happy to watch… but from a skimming glance, all I see is a traditionalist yapping for more male gender roles and excusing women’s complacency on the widespread mistreatment of men and boys. Am I wrong?
/r/MensRights23/09/24 07:39 AM
125

You're trying to use their silly words against them. It's a bad plan. Not only are they masters of misdirection when it comes to abusing language to suit their needs, it's confusing to the onlookers. I recommend replacing "we're too feminist for feminists!" with "we're too egalitarian for feminists". Because feminism is, and always has been, female supremacy, masqurading as equality as a PR move.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/09/24 05:28 AM
396

lol You don’t say! I wonder if having systemic advantages in terms of public assistance, scholarships, and dedicated government agencies might have something to do with that. Yay equality?
/r/MensRights22/09/24 08:54 PM
3

Not at all a fan of her predictable "hold men accountable" angle while overlooking everything it would also hold women accountable for, but to be honest, there's a few things I agree with conceptually. Obviously we're not ready to have this discussion in the US because our government is deeply corrupt and desperately behind the times in terms of legislating modern technology, but theoretically, having a government managed database of all registered citizens could be very, very useful. If you wan…
/r/MensRights22/09/24 04:17 PM
24

“Because they probably liked it” Isn’t it amazing how well trained they are to be misandrists and then claim misandry isn’t real? But seriously though, she has wealth privilege on top of woman privilege. Our justice system doesn’t even bother bringing up charges, let alone punishing such people without damning hard evidence, and even then… not a chance she ever sees jail.
/r/MensRights21/09/24 09:23 PM
15

You see, this is what happens when people mistake the extreme ends of sexual dimorphism for everyone and then conveniently forget that women can, and do, use weapons and even poisons in their DV tactics. Just because men, on average, have more potential for strength than women, does not at all mean that women automatically take more damage than men. What they may lack in raw strength, they often make up for in repetition of non-reciprocal violence that can easily do as much damage as a single he…
/r/MensRights21/09/24 09:12 PM
29

Double standards. If not for them, Feminism wouldn’t have standards at all.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/09/24 06:07 PM
3

Oh Jesus Christ, that was perfectly fine English!!! In laymen’s terms: women seem to have a “natural” and strong bias in favor of other women over men. Men, conversely, do not have this bias. The study involved did not make any assumptions as to whether this is biological or sociological in nature, as far as I know.
/r/MensRights20/09/24 08:39 PM
55

Say it loud and proud. Feminism is female supremacy, not equality. It's in the fucking name for godsakes.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/09/24 05:38 PM
2

I've just come to the conclusion that there are 'traditionalists' scattered throughout life who hold certain, outdated notions as central to their character, no matter their profession. That's the only good explaination I have for doctors who perform circumscisions or therapists that make every excuse to forgive and redeem abusive mothers.
/r/MensRights20/09/24 04:51 PM
15

“Ironic”, or massively telling? Come on lads. The second the “equality” movement started creating sexist pejoratives about male behavior, we should have all cried bullshit and shut it down at the root. I’d opt for “symptom of a greater disease” over irony.
/r/MensRights20/09/24 03:04 PM
16

Feminists are nothing if not massive hypocrites.
/r/MensRights20/09/24 03:01 PM
1

You’re absolutely correct! One of many critical flaws with Feminism, and by extension the “social justice” cancer that developed from it, is that they earnestly believe the revisionist history that “Men” as a collective group are responsible for every atrocity in history prior to women in the US having the right to vote. And even though all forms of legal discrimination against women was outlawed multiple generations ago, women still don’t have any “say” in how the world operates. This fundament…
/r/MensRights20/09/24 02:51 PM
22

Not what was said. If you’re a feminist, you are either knowingly or unwittingly a female supremacist. And ignorance of feminist crimes is not a valid excuse for associating with criminals.
/r/MensRights19/09/24 11:45 PM
115

Because we have evidence that women have been both lying about the severity of their victimhood as well as extended documentation about their bad behavior, things we would like to change in order to reach a more fair and balanced society. And they haaaaaaate that.
/r/MensRights19/09/24 11:33 PM
18

Absolutely spot on video. Short and to the point, though I would like a deeper dive on why women are socialized this way and point some fingers, rather than ambiguously shrugging as to the nature of western women’s intolerance for accountability. Sadly hilarious how many men in the comments are relating to it as well. Want to admit you have a problem, ladies?
/r/MensRights19/09/24 11:30 PM
10

That comes as no surprise. It's a double whammy. Was there institutionalized sexism against women? Certainly at one time, but we've made most to all of that sort of thing pretty fucking illegal by this point. Is there still institutionalized sexism in favor of women? Absolutely. Unfortunately, feminism is female supremacy, so they only whine about the crimes of the past and not the imbalance of the present. Righting wrongs against women is more important than righting wrongs against all people, …
/r/MensRights19/09/24 10:07 PM
69

It's name versus it's supposed mission statement. "This is a movement about equality and equal opportunity!" Great, what's it called? "We named it after women!" ... Feminists have no self awareness.
/r/MensRights19/09/24 09:09 PM
102

Why? A lifetime indoctrination by female supremacists. That's why. It's a gynocentric society. Women don't want to be held accountable for their actions, so they excuse other women of terrible things, including anti-male bigotry.
/r/MensRights19/09/24 08:59 PM
12

The problem then, seems to be, that not only are men conditioned to put women before men; but that women have been conditioned to not care about "their opressor". I wonder and worry that "all of society" will not band together to help men because of the damage that female supremacy has done.
/r/MensRights17/09/24 04:24 PM
96

lol That, is Female Supremacy through the lens of carefully selected, vaguely scientific sounding terms without taking many contradictions into account, or giving an entire segment of humanity the basic empathy of being human. It is, more succinctly, bigotry masquerading as authority by using lofty words and misrepresentation. The nazis used to do it too.
/r/MensRights13/09/24 08:53 PM
7

The answer is fucking obvious, isn't it? Expand the social safety net to actually include men.
/r/MensRights13/09/24 06:33 AM
10

You're absolutely right. I feel safer admitting I'm a trans woman in most spaces online than coming out as a Men's Rights Activist. That's... actually a very sad indictment of how bad things are for men and boys these days.
/r/MensRights10/09/24 11:18 PM
31

Article written by a woman. Typical. I call bullshit. "Men die more from suicide because they're more violent" is victim blaming, and settling the issue with feminist dogma instead of, you know, critically analyzing the actual sociological factors. Having lived over 40 years as a man, let me assure you that throughout my life I have suffered from the result of severe child abuse, C-PTSD and Major Depressive Disorder, to name a few; and mental health services for men simply aren't there. It's lar…
/r/MensRights08/09/24 09:19 PM
-4

But is there any value in creating X-only spaces? Don't get me wrong, I understand there is some value in the concept of gatekeeping. But I believe that value comes mostly from barring overt disruption from antagonists. There should always be room for dissent and discussion within any group, or else that group becomes an ideological echo chamber beholden to its leadership. We're all human. And, to be fair, some humans are warped individuals. Moderation of group content is valuable, to promote he…
/r/MensRights25/08/24 01:13 AM
6

More evidence that trans folk will “bring balance to the force”, as it were. Why was there a female-only app in the first place? Smacks of “acceptable bigotry” double standards yet again. No doubt this exercise in “equality” came from a feminist line of thought. Like, there’s three practical levels of trans (and I’m not gatekeeping, this is just my opinion as a trans woman): 1: Brain in the wrong body. Grats, you have “gender incongruity”. Life is gonna suck for you until you take corrective mea…
/r/MensRights24/08/24 10:48 PM
17

I honestly don’t know why you bother. That person doesn’t have the courage to have a long lasting named account for a start, but also hides behind the typical feminist narrative that a woman withholding sex is always justified by some “emotional labor” she’s been forced to take on, regardless of the actual circumstances. They’re clearly immune to the fact that you’re pointing out their obvious assumptions at the lack of information presented in the original post.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/08/24 09:53 PM
62

I started to read the comments, then remembered that that sub is a misandric shit-hole that routinely excuses women's bad behavior and almost constantly frames the man as the problem in any equation. It's extremely telling that one of the top comments has more upvotes than the post itself, and is of course "Well, consider your wife's feelings". There's a laundry list of failures in that situation. Like, first and foremost on both of them for being adults responsible for children: Depression has …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/08/24 07:43 PM
7

I mean, yes, she's another NeoLiberal shill because the DNC can't furnish anything but lobbyist supported puppets. But she's still the lesser of two evils, and our political system is fucked in a way that only the two parties matter, so... I'll vote the non-fascist, thanks.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/08/24 10:09 PM
1

There's an awful lot of appeal to emotional language you've laid out, but no... links. So I had to research the matter more for myself. You can pick apart my sources if you like, but it has lots of useful links to just about everything you mentioned, except the statute of limitations. Which, it turns out, were extended by Covid. So, sucks to be him, but I guess you shouldn't intend to violate campaign finance laws by misrepresenting your business transactions in New York, during Covid. Was the D…
/r/MensRights23/08/24 05:56 AM
-4

It's kind of weird that you think that being convicted of 34 crimes is a "gotcha"? I mean, you're welcome to argue that our justice system is rigged in various ways and that being convicted of a crime under a corrupt justice system doesn't hold the weight of being convicted of a crime in a "proper" justice system. But it doesn't seem like that's what you're doing. Instead, it kind of seems like you're arguing for a conspiracy of democrats somehow orchestrating the convictions. Which is wild. Is …
/r/MensRights23/08/24 03:20 AM
-5

Is that relevant?
/r/MensRights23/08/24 02:45 AM
-7

And it's embarrassing that anyone with a lick of pride or morals would vote for a 34 time convicted felon, but here we are~ Sorry bros, I'm voting for the lesser of two evils.
/r/MensRights23/08/24 02:13 AM
33

Take a good long look, boys and men. This is a modern, western woman telling you how she honestly perceives the world. This chart is priceless, as it is a full-blown theatrical demonstration of a bigot justifying their hatred in fine detail. This is exactly what a misandrist looks like. And it's also quite important to click through to see the other picture in the album. Look at that decidedly feminist view of predators and "their support scaffolding". You delusional, myopic moron. You actually …
/r/MensRights17/08/24 04:01 PM
77

I'm sure all the men and boys slain by women who felt justified didn't actually hurt in any way. It's not worth engaging. This is just another indoctrinated fool who believes their bigotry is justified.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/08/24 06:56 AM
1

I'm not sure what version you were using, but 4o is like... really excellent at providing working links to actual supporting documentation. I've fun afoul of a handful of broken links, but even in those cases, I've been able to use the language it gave me during research to find and confirm things through traditional googling. Say what you will about making up sources, but it's beyond AI's ability to fabricate external links that, you know, actually work and verify its claims.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/08/24 06:52 PM
1

I know it's trendy to hate AI right now, but you do know that generative AI as we know it is basically a glorified search engine that was trained on real information found online, right? Like, it makes mistakes occasionally, but that just means that you verify its claims, not throw the entire technology away. You can force it to cite its sources. The fact /u/Sydnaktik used ChatGPT is not the problem, so much as the fact they didn't seem to follow up and force it to cite external sources to verif…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/08/24 06:44 PM
8

Around twenty years ago, democrats were trying to push for this "green economy" thing where there would be all these environment related jobs. But that never took off. So now they're going for the feminist economy. And it makes sense, politically, to do so. I was totally behind the green economy push, and I'm sorely disappointed that it's fallen out of the limelight of DNC priorities. But the fact of the matter is that this country's policies have been effectively captured by neither democrats o…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/08/24 05:07 PM
26

Feminist messaging encourages a lack of empathy for male issues, especially if it holds women accountable for bad behavior. It's high time we all recognize this as bigotry and chase it out of the spotlight.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/08/24 04:01 PM
21

This comes as no surprise after Hillary's "women most affected by war" bullshit. The DNC is a neoliberal enterprise, which categorically means virtue signaling for social clout and better business PR. They know, with data to back it up, that women vote more than men and have more spending power than men, so it's just good business to continue popular "social justice" lies that appeal to women's self-interests. If "the law says" equal pay for equal work, why aren't lawmakers going after the emplo…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/08/24 03:53 PM
16

See how complicated this shit is? But we know, for a fact, people are happier being married than they are when divorced or single. And it stands to reason. Even if there wasn't societal pressure from many different influences about why people should get married, there's also just the concept of a happy, loving relationship with all the warm fuzzy stuff we associate with having a "life partner". In sickness and in health, for richer or for poorer, and all that jazz. Whether or not it works out af…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/08/24 05:36 AM
31

It's kind of a crock of shit that plays into typical Feminist messaging that mandates men, and men alone, be responsible for the socially engineered roles we play and so if men are happier than women, there's some implicit exploitation of the entire female sex going on. It's bullshit, and it goes from a place of anti-male bigotry and/or female supremacy, depending on your flavor of lunatic feminist. Here's actual research: https://ifstudies.org/blog/are-married-people-still-happier I'll admit, I…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/08/24 05:36 AM
39

Started? What, like, recently? Where have you been?
/r/MensRights12/08/24 07:39 PM
12

If it weren't for double-standards, Feminism would have no standards at all.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/08/24 04:43 PM
5

While it's entirely fair to say that depression and narcissism has increased over the years, I don't think it's fair to completely attribute that to feminist thinking on gender roles? Let's be real, there is a LOT going on with our society. At the same time that women were "shaking off" gender roles, the economy was tanking and the American family model basically dissolved to suit the needs of industry instead of community. Two working parent households quickly became the norm, not just because …
/r/MensRights11/08/24 06:34 AM
5

And you know, I would agree with the idea that personal freedom and preference entitles anyone to avoid anyone else, for any reason. But as someone who respects human beings as individuals and the concept of justice that maintains innocent until proven guilty, I believe the moral decision is to allow people to represent themselves and make judgement calls on a person by person basis. If you want to avoid "sexual interest", that's fine. Perfectly understandable, have a nice day. But if you're imp…
/r/MensRights11/08/24 04:15 AM
5

Not everyone wants what? Gay people are just people. They aren't sex perverts or criminals. It's an invisible preference. It's like avoiding people who only listen to opera in their basement. Like, what does it matter? If I said "Ah man, is it possible to find a group of men friends who aren't Hispanic these days?", anyone would be in the right to question "Wait, what do you have against Hispanic people?"
/r/MensRights11/08/24 03:57 AM
24

You're in luck! Only about 5.5% of the (American) population identify as LGBT. Your chances of coming across a gay dude in your friend circle is pretty low, tbh. But the real question is, you're an adult. You can set boundaries. Why do you actively avoid gay people? That seems... a little weird, without any context.
/r/MensRights11/08/24 03:44 AM
21

I mean, I don't know why this is in humor? It's a random smattering of facts which support the notion that gender roles are socialized as witnessed by different cultural traditions throughout history where women have done "masculine" things and men have done "feminine" things. Anyone who went to school and thought critically about the subject should've figured that out by now. Femininity in the west was redefined and expanded by women's empowerment groups to be inclusive and cast off stereotypic…
/r/MensRights11/08/24 01:10 AM
13

I mean, the shorter answer is just "Capitalists". Feminism relies on the skewing of statistics and a victimhood mentality, ensuring that the actual world of the working class being exploited and set up to fail, is actually an organized conspiracy against women. It flies in the face of the numerous reports that women make more spending decisions, get more degrees, and vote more than men. Women are just helpless to do anything about male power structures, supposedly, so be angry at all men for the…
/r/MensRights10/08/24 09:10 PM
0

Okay, so where's your evidence?
/r/MensRights10/08/24 08:47 AM
8

She has a vagina and a womb. Why shouldn’t she be in women’s sports? And what on earth does this have to do with men’s rights?
/r/MensRights10/08/24 07:48 AM
1

My advice, as an old internet weirdo: Captain Picard said it best. I'm not encouraging you to stop caring about men, or male psychology though, I'm simply stating that from what you've told me of the situation, it sounds like he held unhealthy relationship expectations and didn't communicate well. One man may be a lost cause, but that certainly doesn't men that all men are. So when you come into a male space, like this forum, and pose the question to "men" as to why a man did a thing, it follows…
/r/MensRights10/08/24 04:54 AM
2

You made some mistakes. It's not polite, appropriate, or normal for people in a healthy relationship to literally sign a contract about fidelity. That should've been a giant red flag to walk away. We'll never know what his reason was if he refuses to tell you. But then again, why would you want to waste any cycles on someone who is clearly unable to communicate their honest intent?
/r/MensRights10/08/24 04:29 AM
2

He was obviously using them before he met me, So the whole loneliness thing doesn’t apply. With all due respect, unless you ask him what he's been going through, how can you know that "loneliness doesn't apply"? He broke up with me for no reason, Oh no, he had a reason. All actions have reasons. You just don't know it, because you either didn't sufficiently ask the question, or because he was hiding it from you. Could be either. He rejected a relationship with me so he could go back to getting a…
/r/MensRights10/08/24 04:17 AM
3

But yes, isn’t this laziness? I dunno, is it lazy for women to wait around for men to initiate all the time? Fun quote of the industrial age: Work smarter, not harder. how this is fulfilling to men? Men get lonely. Not a big mystery. Having someone to cuddle, and/or fuck, really goes a long way for a gender that barely gets any sort of compassion in life. Is he really happy with this dynamic? I mean, probably not. It might be scratching an itch, but it doesn't fulfill higher psychological and em…
/r/MensRights10/08/24 03:34 AM
13

Hello random woman! Yeah, you're welcome here. We just talk about men's issues, all genders are allowed; just keep it topical, you know? So, psychologically, men are quite different from women. This is due to a bit of brain biology, but also due largely to hormones and socialization. You have to understand, and not many women do, that due to various sociological factors, men in the west are raised by both parents to be emotionally 'sturdy', hard working to provide for partner/family, and largely…
/r/MensRights10/08/24 02:52 AM
27

Welcome to the realization you're living in a gynocentric society. We've demonized men as regressive, violent, and simple; while elevating women to a status of progressive, caring, and superior. Once you start to see past the messaging you've been fed, you start to realize the truth of things.
/r/MensRights08/08/24 04:11 PM
4

We don't live in a gynocentric society we live in a plutocracy. You may be surprised to learn this, but the two are not mutually exclusive.
/r/MensRights08/08/24 03:33 PM
42

The problem, IMO, is how women perceive men. Women (big generalization), deep down, thanks to feminist bullshit, believe that men are basically defective women. So when women imagine male power structures, they imagine them in the way that women have come to accept them; which is extreme amounts of nepotism based on gender. Because remember, being a woman is somehow a "qualification". Men, however, are not defective women. Go figure. Men, in power, do any number of things. Sometimes very selfish…
/r/MensRights08/08/24 03:41 AM
1

Haven't tried. Kinda busy with other things. You know, daily grind, making a living, surviving under the yolk of crony capitalism and a collapsing ecosystem. Fun shit.
/r/MensRights08/08/24 03:29 AM
-6

Ah. Now we fall into the curious gambit of "is it racist if it's the truth?" Which is responsible for killing more people in this country, "islamic jihadists" or white men? In the same vein, if I were to say that black people commit more crime per capita than white people, is that racist? Because it's true. I think what we need to address here is racial insensitivity and gender insensitivity. If you follow the link above, you'll find a fairly well-written piece regarding why black people are fou…
/r/MensRights08/08/24 02:57 AM
-5

Okay, so find me a statement about "democrats" (like, an elected official not some bozo on twitter) making statements about men using the language of hate.
/r/MensRights08/08/24 01:23 AM
4

No worries, I didn't take it any weird direction. I agree. The fact that groups of people can openly perpetrate hate speech against other groups of people, especially on a so-called "moderated space", is fucking appalling.
/r/MensRights07/08/24 11:58 PM
-5

I'll give you a chance to prove your point. Please provide to me "any statement" with Harris talking about men, using the language of hate.
/r/MensRights07/08/24 11:57 PM
13

It's a legitimate concern. Selectively applied rules are used for exclusion, not inclusion, and that's regressive. But you're also preaching to the choir. I like 'women behaving badly' posts on this subreddit as much as the next person, it's good to shine a light on bigotry when it impacts men. But at the same time, posting here isn't going to change anything. What we need, conceptually, is to bring topics like this up on other social media platforms and ask the direct question "Why does Reddit …
/r/MensRights07/08/24 11:40 PM
26

I mean, it's a feminist sub and we know that feminists are female supremacist trash. All you can do is point out when they violate site-wide rules.
/r/MensRights07/08/24 11:14 PM
23

Report it for hate and move on. What're the mean little cat ladies going to do, call you names?
/r/MensRights07/08/24 11:07 PM
3

Republicans killed the nuclear family, blamed it on the democrats with their mystery moon logic, and then society starts to fall apart as everyone suddenly realizes "Oh, kids need parents, not just working adults providing room and board". Fun times.
/r/MensRights07/08/24 11:05 PM
-8

Eh. Hyperbole. Don't mistake apathy as hatred.
/r/MensRights07/08/24 11:02 PM
-1

Yes, I've done my homework. I know what the white feather campaign was. Let me try again, with bigger letters in hopes you read it this time. Men being shamed as cowards isn't instinct either.
/r/MensRights07/08/24 10:23 PM
-4

Oh, you added that to your post afterward. I didn't see the edit. Yeah, that's a nah from me dog. Men being shamed as cowards isn't instinct either. So I'm really not sure where you're pulling these broad and baseless assumptions from.
/r/MensRights07/08/24 10:19 PM
-1

The Fed enables so-called "crony" capitalism. Your opinion on Marx in no way makes the Federal Reserve some communist enterprise. Kind of weird you didn't respond to the other portions of my post where you claimed war was instinctual, or some nonsense.
/r/MensRights07/08/24 10:09 PM
2

schools to teach that capitalism is bad Bruh. Did you attend an American school? In my day, public school didn't even mention the term capitalism or socialism. Civics was what it was, and you just accepted it. When I went to college, I had the extreme displeasure of having an economics teacher that was a Hayek fangirl and squashed all discussion of anything that wasn't highly pro-federal reserve, pro-capitalist dogma. American schools in particular have been meddled with by various large industr…
/r/MensRights07/08/24 09:24 PM
-1

Nice article. But the title kind of misses the key culprit. Capitalists want men to be productive and go to war, and women to make more babies to replenish the fallen men. If you aren't willing to talk about the few who control the many, you're not getting to the root of the problem.
/r/MensRights07/08/24 08:51 PM
2

Why yes, yes it is.
/r/MensRights07/08/24 05:09 PM
18

It's bad female behavior. You're honestly surprised society isn't talking about bad female behavior? What rock have you been under for the past few decades?
/r/MensRights07/08/24 05:04 PM
56

The world has a gynocentric bias. Reddit is a microcosm of the world. Therefore, Reddit has a gynocentric bias. They don't care about equal representation and never have. Feminism is about female supremacy. This is the bed it made, and now we all have to lay in it. Sucks, don't it?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/08/24 05:02 PM
23

Different societal roles, different pressures. Men outside of a relationship are pressured to be in a relationship. Men in a relationship are pressured to "meet her needs". Which typically means: be well paid, but also have enough time off to also do housework and make babies. Make no mistake, women have more pressure (generally by other women HINT HINT) to have children, but if a woman in a relationship isn't having children, it's almost always the man's fault. Literally, no matter what the iss…
/r/MensRights06/08/24 08:42 PM
22

Uh huh. So... women have never been in a position of power throughout history? Not once? Not even within the household? Are you seriously implying that women have zero accountability in the propagation of male disposability? You think no woman on earth has ever nudged their significant other of the male persuasion to 'check on that noise'? You think no mother on earth has ever been proud that their son had joined the military? Do you think that no female doctor has ever performed a circumcision?…
/r/MensRights06/08/24 08:32 PM
4

You know, I've never understood going through a person's post history to discredit them in a thread when they're perfectly capable of representing themselves where it's contextually relevant. Doesn't matter if OP personally released covid. All they did in this thread was point out Feminist hysteria, and rightfully so.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/08/24 08:22 PM
8

Why I don't know what you're implying! Mothers are seen as the primary parent, and teaching and healthcare have become female-dominated fields. Surely someone is socializing our boys, and only our boys, to be horrible rape monsters! It must be... THE PATRIARCHY!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/08/24 08:20 PM
91

I've long argued that anti-trans sentiment is largely rooted in misandry, and this just proves my point.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/08/24 07:41 PM
5

I think this problem applies to a lot of people in the modern world. When you take away role models that embody the human spirit of invention and bettering life for all people, what we've been left with is the very capitalist-driven notion that monetary success is what everyone should strive for. What's more, as our overlords deliberately suppress wages despite increased productivity over time, they've bankrupted the concept of merit. Doing a great job no longer means being recognized, especiall…
/r/MensRights02/08/24 05:00 PM
115

Like, get over it, bitch. You sign up to be a medical practitioner, you serve everyone unless you're a specialist. The problem, obviously, is the training. If you were trained to do a job and you encounter something that wasn't covered properly, you're going to be bad at it. Look at how boys are failing out of school, look at how men are taking their own lives, like.. How can you not see that the curriculum that you and your peers have been huffing for the past 30 years is fucking trash at addre…
/r/MensRights02/08/24 04:22 AM
5

It's a compound problem. In no particular order: Feminist messaging. When the rad fems could no longer hide their true colors, equality went out the window (if it was ever there to begin with). Nestled somewhere between the empowerment propaganda of "the future is female" and "a woman needs a man like a fish needs a bicycle", this seemingly innocuous viewpoint was thrust forward that "women can do anything men can do, just as good". That's not true. And it goes both ways. There are some things m…
/r/MensRights02/08/24 04:02 AM
205

Hilarious and predictable that it's already being heavily moderated and the biased mods are pleading with users to buy into the narrative. Remember men, your feelings are valid... unless women have a problem with them.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/07/24 06:25 PM
2

I’ll be honest, there aren’t a lot of great self help resources for men that don’t come with a lot of agenda driven baggage of “what men should be”, at least in my experience. However, YouTube has a fair amount of resources for figuring yourself out. I highly recommend Dr. K as a start, as he often tackles modern problems and has some male specific content. https://youtube.com/@healthygamergg I’m out and about right now so that’s the only resource I have off the top of my head, but let me if you…
/r/MensRights26/07/24 05:30 PM
12

Traditional gender roles are a thing of the past, get used to it. Women's lib broke the chains for women, and did fuck all for men. But it's a complicated issue. Men neither stepped up to participate, nor were they extended an invitation to; Feminism has always been female supremacy wearing the mask of equality. But equality is good for all of us. We just have to fight for ourselves like women fought for themselves. The true fight is not men versus women, but the working class versus the ruling …
/r/MensRights26/07/24 04:51 PM
9

Antiquated gender roles and sexist bullshit. A healthy relationship is about communication, compromise, and compatible interests. If a man's sex drive is significantly higher than his partner's, he's not going to be happy. So why stay with that? Simple, because he prefers 'some sex' as better than 'no sex', or single life. Realistically, sex compatibility is something you should figure out with your partner before you make any motion to "get serious", because it's a deal breaker. You're setting …
/r/MensRights26/07/24 09:03 AM
27

Yeah, I kind of thought as much. Unfortunately, far too many people have been indoctrinated to believe that "you can't discriminate against X" is somehow valid? There's no logic behind it. It falls apart under even the most basic scrutiny, but all of the assholes they've built their belief systems around echo this nonsense so they take it as honest gospel. If someone discriminates against you for your birth criteria (age, gender, sex, sexuality, race, pigmentation, nationality, etc), they're bei…
/r/MensRights25/07/24 09:38 PM
9

Oh thank fuck. The first time someone explained they were "demisexual" to me, I was confounded because... that's just normal behavior, right? And yeah, as you say, most people aren't fucking a ton outside of relationships. The media and dating consumerism have grossly distorted people's views on healthy sexuality, IMO. After looking into the matter more, I came to the conclusion it's one of those weird labels that people include about themselves to seem more interesting than they actually are.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/07/24 08:42 PM
7

For sure, and props to you! I do what little I can as part of a discord support group for trans folk, most of which is just being a decent friend, sharing memes, and linking the occasional motivational video. I too have taken up the mantle of sharing a few more hug emojis and shoulder to lean on for my all my friends, but especially the guys since I know they just have less support in general. Sometimes just being an example of someone who didn't give up, goes a long way for those who're still i…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/07/24 06:18 PM
18

We're on the same page, for sure. Keep speaking your truth! I really do believe that trans men are going to be the bridge on which men and women can recognize the reality of misandry. It kind of sucks that being true to yourself means having to become an advocate for fairness and change, but that's kind of the age we live in.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/07/24 05:06 PM
84

Hey guy, welcome to the shit show! :3 I'm a trans woman myself, but still associate with the 'male advocate community' because, well, I lived for 40 years as a man before transitioning, and there's really no denying that men have it rough in our current society. I honestly feel bad for the trans masc community because, as you've experienced, the LGBT+ mainstream is decidedly feminist and as you've clocked in to, modern feminism is actually female supremacy and not equality. You definitely get th…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/07/24 03:44 PM
4

Personally, I've never encountered a feminist who wasn't a happy capitulating capitalist. They're always selling books or workshops or some exclusively for women product/service. They obviously don't care about socialism if they're voting for neoliberal capitalist warhawks like Hillary Clinton, because at the end of the day, Female Supremacy is the goal of feminism, not equality. IMO, 'social architect' types tried to use Marxism as a lure for egalitarians to be tempted over to Feminism while ma…
/r/MensRights08/06/24 06:08 PM
-1

FFS, Marx did not invent the concept of oppression. It's reductionist foolishness. By the same measure, you could call Pokemon "Darwinist" because they use the term evolution. Or Harry Potter "Tolkienist" because it's a book series that involves magic.
/r/MensRights08/06/24 05:54 PM
-1

So... you've got nothing then. That's what I thought.
/r/MensRights03/06/24 08:44 PM
1

Not a great take. "Peasant farmers" lived in servitude to a land owner, and if they couldn't pay their dues they were evicted, jailed, sold into even worse slavery, or worse. "Peasant farmers" fought long and hard for their rights, which is why we celebrate concepts like democracy and labor day. When "peasant farmers" turned to crime, it was an uprising that typically ended with bodies strewn about. TBH, the peasants still haven't overthrown the last kings, so that isn't working out very well fo…
/r/MensRights03/06/24 07:15 PM
2

Are you for real? That capitalist cunt wouldn’t be seen supporting Marx. I’d be blown away if you could prove she’s even remotely Marxist.
/r/MensRights03/06/24 06:42 PM
0

He can't even cite one. This lunatic is tilting at windmills and other imaginary monsters.
/r/MensRights03/06/24 05:46 PM
3

"I demand to see mythical creature!" *provides mythical creature* "Emoji response" You're a joke, kid. Move along, and let the adults make posts with actual substance.
/r/MensRights03/06/24 05:33 PM
-9

Bro. I'm probably the only Marxist you've ever actually spoken to. I don't buy into any modern feminist bullshit. It has nothing to do with Marxism, and never has. So here I am, an activist who doesn't subscribe to man-hating bullshit. Marx was an economic theorist/activist. He did more for men by championing worker's rights than most elected officials have in the past 200 years. He's vilified by capitalist stooges who think if they play the game hard enough they too can rub elbows with the elit…
/r/MensRights03/06/24 04:02 PM
2

Because the world runs on capitalism, and capitalism requires exploitation. The system demands winners and losers. It requires laborers, soldiers, and cannon fodder. The elite control the media, they organize price fixing, they lobby for looser constraints for ever-increasing gains. The system is a cancer, and like all cancers, it will kill the host if left unchecked. Desperation forces men to fight for their country when their country has no more programs left to help them. It is, without quest…
/r/MensRights03/06/24 03:51 PM
-3

Marxism has nothing to do with this. Feminism has demonized lonely men as undesirables. Much in the same vein as the women who prey on taken men, there's a distinct population of women who only trust men who are vetted by other women. These women are misandrists. They've been indoctrinated to fear and hate men. WTF is "Marxian-thinking"? FFS, educate yourself instead of being afraid of colleges.
/r/MensRights03/06/24 03:39 PM
6

She was always a sexist bitch.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/06/24 03:30 PM
4

Feminism is a capitalist offshoot. Conservatism is full-blooded capitalism. They thrive because they're well-funded, no matter the poison and misery they bring. Men's Rights won't gain momentum until the beast is slain, because Men's Rights is synonymous with Worker's Rights, and capitalists don't like that at all. The owning class will never share their portion with the working class. Artificial scarcity and in-fighting are how they fool us into fighting each other for scraps.
/r/MensRights28/05/24 05:35 AM
1

The modern education system is controlled and fueled by Capitalist ideals. Companies make curriculum. You're extremely close to seeing the truth for what it is, but you haven't gotten to the root of the problem.
/r/MensRights21/05/24 03:22 PM
65

Yes, yes it does. Looking at men's privledges and rights compared to women's, it's extremely clear to anyone paying attention that men are worse off by most meaningful measures. The problem is that most people aren't paying attention. They're too busy being worked to death by the system that exploits all people regardless of sex or gender.
/r/MensRights16/05/24 03:31 PM
8

The mentality behind this conformity is the same behind the school uniform: deprived of freedom, the conditioned mind is kept streamlined for master's tasks and not troublesome thoughts of individuality or rebellion. The simple truth is that women used their leverage in society to free themselves from the conformist shackles of capitalism while men continue to toil away. It's in our biology. Our muscles are denser, our skin more coarse. We have been made pack animals of society. Comfort and happ…
/r/MensRights14/05/24 09:30 PM
15

The problem is that society, both men and women, readily condemns the actions of terrible men all the time. We send them to prison. The PROBLEM, is that women by and large do NOT hold other women accountable for their actions. The evidence of this is that we often fail to even charge women with crimes, let alone sentence them equally to men. My opinion? Not my circus, not my monkeys. I'm responsible for my own actions, and I refuse to be held accountable for the crimes of others due to my blood …
/r/MensRights29/01/24 07:28 PM
4

Feminism is a female supremacy movement, wearing the equality mask to make it palatable. Always has been. That's why the two sides are functionally incompatible.
/r/MensRights27/01/24 08:12 PM
5

Unfortunately, the reddit sub for MensLib is a fucking batshit insane asylum of Feminists trying to groom people into ignoring women's role in societal bullshit. So while I'm all for casting off rigid definitions of masculinity and capitalist oppression, the Men's Lib movement on Reddit is a fucking dead end.
/r/MensRights19/01/24 09:26 PM
9

Everyone else has been super nice about it, but I'm going to say this bluntly. Speak plainly, and this forum is not your personal blog.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/01/24 09:16 PM
-7

I'm sure you're just as furious about all the catholic priests that have actually been caught molesting kids. You know... Something real, that's been happening for hundreds of years? Fastest way to be labeled a bigot is to regurgitate bigot talking points, my guy.
/r/MensRights16/01/24 11:17 AM
-4

Of all the conspiracy theories I've heard... this one is just magnificent.
/r/MensRights16/01/24 10:55 AM
3

Oh don’t be ridiculous. You’re here, commenting on this thread. You’re not some random being screamed at because you haven’t written books condemning these s#its. You showed up here. You could easily have said they’re scum and trans activists should just condemn them. Instead you tried to deflect from them. Why? Are you in the same thread, kiddo? Let me rewind a couple posts to where I said explicitly this: "Yeah, I'm appalled by it, but it's also so insignificant it doesn't impact my life at al…
/r/MensRights16/01/24 10:52 AM
-1

Pssst. The thread is about OP's sexual preferences. Everyone is talking about it because it's the topic of the thread. It's a bit weird of you not to notice. Maybe talk to a fourth grade English teacher about reading comp. :3
/r/MensRights16/01/24 10:46 AM
3

But how on earth are those so-called trans activists ok to do this stuff? I dunno, bro. How do so-called men's rights activists get off saying women's shouldn't be able to vote? Oh Right, that's a vanishingly small minority you don't want to associate with because they're regressive and harm your movement. I don't take responsibility for weird 'trap sexuals' anymore than your average feminist takes responsibility for TERFs like JK Rowling. Anyone can be an activist. There's no litmus test, there…
/r/MensRights16/01/24 10:07 AM
5

Don't ever let anyone tell you how to Pick your partner, this is one of the most important decisions of your Life and you have every right to make this decision in any way. your feelings are valid afterall for whatever reason, no matter what they are. This, 100%. Shout it from the roof tops. End thread. ​ it's not transphobic not to want to date trans people. It's really not! But when op is like "I'm losing my rights, I'm afraid of being raped, what will people think if I go out with a trans-wom…
/r/MensRights16/01/24 09:59 AM
0

Wow, nice lies. Never once said anyone was fragile. And saying someone is cis isn't an insult? Never said consent wasn't important. Never even implied that people should consider fucking someone they're uncomfortable with. But hey, commenter with no content still gonna comment, huh?
/r/MensRights16/01/24 09:55 AM
1

However, i see that you think that because i do not want to be in a relationship with a trans or have sex with one that makes me have some kind of phobia. Nooooo... You're projecting. I don't give the slightest hint of a fuck who you sleep with. I can see, regardless of reading comprehension (oh what a cute comeback!), that you've readily confessed that you're worried what other people will think about you if you were to have "non hetero relations". And that you're clearly worried about being de…
/r/MensRights16/01/24 09:53 AM
2

I absolutely agree. Was that literally the only place I lost you?
/r/MensRights16/01/24 09:47 AM
1

Um, you are so hung up on yours, that you literally changed everything physically about yourself. So before you go calling the kettle etc etc, this has nothing to do with “none of your business” if it’s someone you want to date. First. Hi! Hello. I'm a real person. You don't know me, and you obviously do not understand what my trans journey is about, so... let's stop putting words in my mouth. My gender expression has zero to do with my sexuality, thanks. ​ Expecting someone who is a potential r…
/r/MensRights16/01/24 09:46 AM
2

But that's why it should be one of the first things shared on a dating profile, And honestly, it is. Most trans-women who are dating online put it front and center in their profile. The weirdos that want to trick people into bed are a scant minority, and it's doubtful that all the guys worried about it will ever encounter one.
/r/MensRights16/01/24 09:35 AM
-3

So because there are people who think trans people should be murdered, it’s ok to scream “bigot” because a hetero guy doesn’t want to have sex with a woman with a penis? WHOA! Where the fuck did that come from? Holy bad actor, batman. How do you expect to engage in honest conversation when you put such loaded words into someone else's mouth? Especially in a topic about consent. Honestly.
/r/MensRights16/01/24 09:17 AM
-5

No, see, I took a moment out of my day to explain the trans experience, and you took offense to that. You still haven't clarified what of my comment was "disgusting" when I outright explained to you in multiple instances that no one is trying to take away your consent. And there you are like a weird little cis dude explaining to me what deal breakers are and that trans-women can't have babies, as if I didn't know that? So yeah, there's no taboo as you claim in your original post. No one has take…
/r/MensRights16/01/24 09:10 AM
-1

There's also an online set that claims the earth is flat. Yeah, I'm appalled by it, but it's also so insignificant it doesn't impact my life at all. And it doesn't really effect yours either, so... why get all upset about it? "People online called me untrue names, WAH" Like, grow up. People want me dead, people called you names. Perspective.
/r/MensRights16/01/24 09:03 AM
-11

This is a very digusting answer Oh please. How? The little tirade you go on in your reply goes to show you didn't actually read what I wrote, you just stumbled over your own sensitivity and blew a gasket. ​ I do not appreciate how you attempted to sway my consent and blow it off. Bro, you're delusional. And after your response? Maybe a bit transphobic after all.
/r/MensRights16/01/24 08:59 AM
-18

> Why is this right taken away? Uhhhh... what? Honest question: Do you even know any trans people? Because this reads like one of those weird hetero fears that's basically a myth. Y'know, like poisoned Halloween candy and razorblades in apples. It may have happened, but it's not statistically significant. There's basically two schools of thought when it comes to trans-folk: Pride, or none of your business. If you're dealing with a trans person who is proud, then chances are they're literally wea…
/r/MensRights16/01/24 08:39 AM
4

There actually is a significant glimmer of hope, but I don't think many people see it because they're (rightfully) invested in their own matters. At the risk of being blasted by my brothers on the right, Trans Rights are Men's Rights. We're all vividly aware that Feminism is Female Supremacy, and that Men's Rights are fundamentally a different animal because we want actual equality. But what does that look like, from a legislative angle? Gender Neutral Legislation. If we argue for the removal of…
/r/MensRights14/01/24 09:14 AM
17

Right, like you came here to "empathize". Bad actors don't deserve our time of day. Be gone.
/r/MensRights13/01/24 12:20 AM
36

Feminism is Female Supremacy. Of course it's a fucking haven for narcissists. I'm sure racial and national supremacists fall into the same boat.
/r/MensRights12/01/24 09:48 PM
2

Pro-tip: if you're looking for information online and have access to Chat GPT 4, it honestly serves as a better knowledge search engine than Google anymore. You can specifically instruct that it provide citations for its information, which links to useful sources in most cases. I might not use it for breaking news in the past few weeks, but I would highly recommend it for like... How to build a computer in 2023, or how does quartz form, or What were the achievements of Malcolm X? It's much more …
/r/MensRights12/01/24 09:14 PM
16

Feminism is Female Supremacy. Of course it's only for women. I mean, nice post and all. But it's a tad wordy. "Any group that argues for special privileges is a supremacy group" That's all you really needed. And there's decades of evidence, from the Seneca Falls conference to present, that Feminism seeks to blame men, as a whole, for their issues. It has always seen the sacrifice of men for the benefit of women as both necessary and beneficial to its ends. Feminism has always worn the skin of eq…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/01/24 08:53 PM
1

I'm not sure I understand what isn't being gotten, so excuse me as I try to elaborate a little and you can correct me or ask questions if it still doesn't jive. Though I've been subbed here for a while, I only occasionally engage in conversations here because I'm often late to the table. To that end, outside the mission statement to the righthand column, I couldn't tell you what male advocates here pin as the reason for men not having any reproductive rights. I, personally, am upset that many wo…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/01/24 02:26 AM
5

All I ask is for you to recognize the distinction between 21st century feminism and other historical renditions of feminism. Most people fail to do this which also fuels the false belief that 21st century feminism that we produce, and experience is of the same nobility as it always has. The core tenants and sexist nature that we think of are quite distinctly different from what they were 50 or 100 years ago. That's fair, and I do recognize that modern feminism is worse off for everyone compared …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/01/24 05:50 PM
22

When I, now adult woman, was in my early adolescence about 8 years ago (12y) complained to female teachers about sexual harassment from male students I was specifically told the quote "boys will be boys." I was told things like "he's hitting you because he likes you." These are very real things that happened. I'm very sorry that happened to you, but that too, in my opinion, comes from the same place as my initial comment. Feminism, for generations now, has explicitly condoned the bad behavior of…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/01/24 11:39 AM
46

This mentality comes from the indoctrination of feminism. Many women are told absolutely outrageous lies to the effect that men see they as less than human, objects, property, or worse. They're quite literally groomed to believe that the average man is a monster just waiting to dehumanize women. In reality, these women are confused and, if they had better understanding of the situation, would understand that they're demanding respect without reciprocation. Yet another fucking instance of Female …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/01/24 08:25 AM
11

What a bigoted, ignorant, indoctrinated take. Your out of proportion fear is not justification to hate anyone, bitch.
/r/MensRights11/01/24 08:07 AM
22

Feminism is Female Supremacy. They cannot achieve their goals of female supremacy without tearing men down.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/01/24 05:05 PM
49

The root of this problem is a simple one: Women are more insecure than men. This is not a biological truth, this is just more social conditioning bullshit tied to gender roles. Men are taught to be stoic and self sufficient, women are taught to be emotionally open and share their issues. What *is* a biological truth is that certain sexual dimorphic characteristics are attractive to certain groups. Chins, backs, forearms, boobs, butts, thighs, etc. We often dress in ways to both flatter our featu…
/r/MensRights08/01/24 06:58 PM
3

Short answer: Because women are insecure as fuck, yo.
/r/MensRights08/01/24 12:14 PM
11

It's just more Female Supremacist dogma and rhetoric, distracting the masses from the actual issues of Religious and Capitalist overreach. Capitalism can't exist without perpetual growth, which is why the billionaires are starting to fear monger that we're all going to perish due to a so called population deficit. The machine needs human blood to run, and babies are its fuel; it just so happens that religion works as a taboo shield from scrutiny as it proselytizes "life is sacred" while simultan…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/01/24 12:08 PM
28

IMO, there's no winning trying to figure out what women mean by this shitty term. Every one of them will move the goal posts to suit their personal preference. It's just another derogatory remark that proves women are horrible at communicating their own intentions. Call an asshole an asshole, and be done with it.
/r/MensRights31/12/23 02:29 PM
1

As a child who was neglected by both parents, I don't feel obligated to protect anyone but myself. Thanks.
/r/MensRights30/12/23 06:23 PM
3

I swear to fucking christ, this dumb bitch in chat today tried to say that women didn't make up 50% of cultural influence... ​ All those gender studies, no grasp of actual sociology statistics. What a fucking shame.
/r/MensRights19/12/23 07:02 PM
12

Yeah, upon reading his departure notice, it seemed pretty clear to me that the unhinged psychos targeting this poor dude were either radical feminists or TERFs due to his pro-trans views that were also cited as part of why he was harassed. Funny that every time feminists hound a man for being pro-women in "the wrong way", not unlike scientist shirt man, they get off the hook for what are openly hateful critiques and acts.
/r/MensRights19/12/23 06:55 PM
0

The enemy of the people is capitalism. Always has been.
/r/MensRights07/12/23 06:07 PM
8

The Patriarchy is a fairy tale that bitter fools teach their children instead of taking accountability for being bitter fools.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/12/23 05:30 PM
57

Absolutely. I can point to several instances where I would've been treated better, given assistance, and/or would've been accepted more if I was a woman. To be frank, it is devastating being a male with mental illness. The field revolves around women, there simply aren't enough resources for men, and it's by design of female supremacists. The male suicide epidemic exists because it's harder to be a suffering man than it is to be a suffering woman, full stop.
/r/MensRights19/11/23 03:47 PM
7

Feminism is Female Supremacy. Women were sold a story that they were oppressed by men, that they had to fear men, that they had to overcome men. And while that sort of competitive spirit drives the gears of capitalism like a good little machine... It's not healthy. You may think that anger suits you, you may think that you're better than your fears, but at the end of the day... at the end of your life... All hate will ever do is exhaust you and embolden your enemies.
/r/MensRights19/11/23 07:13 AM
23

men who overvalue sex and reject traditional values should face social ostracism When traditional values condemn men to the front lines of war, traditional values can frankly, fuck right off. Honestly kind of weird and off-putting that you slipped that into your final statement while neglecting to mention it in the body of your post. You can't teach men to have self-value while also extoling trad con virtues. Selfless sacrifice for no reward is how you get simps in the first place. In my opinion…
/r/MensRights19/11/23 01:30 AM
7

Hey there. I may not be the best person to talk to, but I made to to my 40s after a life long battle with depression from growing up in an abusive single mother household. Semi-retired IT guy, I've done office jobs, retail shit, and consultant work, so I've got some stories. My DMs are generally open to anyone who has questions or concerns about anything or any place I've posted, and that includes being active on this subreddit for the past six years. I certainly don't know everything, but I'm w…
/r/MensRights19/11/23 12:49 AM
16

It's the gender studies equivalence to flat earthers. These misguided people believe in a grand conspiracy that never happened, would be ridiculous to happen in the first place, and is readily disprovable by math and pictures. This means they are idiots. That's the end of the discussion. Remove idiots from your life, and tell them exactly why.
/r/MensRights19/11/23 12:27 AM
2

Say it with me boys and girls: Feminism is Female Supremacy.
/r/MensRights18/11/23 05:58 PM
26

People who pick fights are assholes. There, mystery solved.
/r/MensRights18/11/23 01:18 AM
2

Ever seen One Punch Man? The smart thing to do is to not get involved with violent people in the first place. If someone starts hitting you though? End it. No point in drawing out a conflict. Just strike once, hard and fast, and most attackers will be stunned by retaliation. They're hoping to prey upon the weak, so prove them wrong. Break their nose, they'll back down. That goes for any man or woman getting in your face. Just don't put up with it. Either disengage, or disable. This comes from a …
/r/MensRights17/11/23 08:17 PM
61

I've said it before, but always be wary of people trying to define what manhood or masculinity is. These people seek to control you.
/r/MensRights17/11/23 06:40 PM
62

It's a lie, mate. It's Female Supremacy disguised as equality. What they say and what they do are two different things, history provides a track record.
/r/MensRights17/11/23 04:07 PM
3

I don't expect much of anything from anyone. I would like for people to be permitted access to "gendered areas" based on what they present as. It takes a significant amount of physical and mental effort to try and 'pass' as the opposite gender, so I respect those who make a genuine effort. I'm not transitioning any time soon, so I present as male, physically, pronouns and all. Makes it easier for everyone. Doesn't change that I'm trans. So no, I don't expect access to female spaces. But I do exp…
/r/MensRights16/11/23 03:59 AM
3

All TERFs are misandrists or female supremacists. That's why they're TERFs. They cannot stand to have "men" amongst their radical feminist ranks. TRAs can be feminist, but TERFs have it baked into the name. Come on now.
/r/MensRights15/11/23 11:37 PM
4

IMO, people who support TERFs are: As dumb as TERFs. Don't realize that TERFs are all about Misandry Think they have allies in combating 'the woke agenda' There's nothing 'woke' about being Trans. It's a head disorder that's easier to address by changing the body rather than reconditioning the head. I know, I'm trans. But both transitioning and "reeducation" have huge bad potentially suicide inducing side effects, as well as being poorly studied in general (IMO), so I don't recommend either. Tra…
/r/MensRights15/11/23 10:37 PM
68

As always, the best counter against ignorance is knowledge. History itself is the antithesis of Feminist theory. Just being casually aware of military and political history is enough to begin laughing in their faces. Historically all military conscription has been predominately male. That is just a fact. To be lined up with a weapon in hand and marched to death is how men have been historically oppressed, and that's an undeniable fact which continues to this day. Political history is much more c…
/r/MensRights15/11/23 10:27 PM
48

I feel like this falls into the ever growing "Studies show: Women are actually bad at communicating" pile. Time after time, positive preconceptions about women being more "mature" or "emotionally intelligent" seem to crumble in the face of actual science. ​ Contrary to what female supremacists would have you believe, women are people too! And the average person, is pretty dumb.
/r/MensRights15/11/23 09:34 PM
17

Why the dishonesty?? Whats the agenda? It's called female supremacy.
/r/MensRights14/11/23 09:35 PM
2

Question though: Does this article specifically blame men for it's poor performance? I ask because it's a fucking long article and from skimming it, it doesn't look like it does. I ask because this particular article doesn't seem relevant to men's rights, but it IS relevant to the discussion of whether or not men are withdrawing from 'woke' or female-led films. ​ IMO, you should've posted a more flagrantly bashing article and then linked to this article in the comments explaining your point.
/r/MensRights14/11/23 09:26 PM
5

In our society we socialize people to normalize and internalize certain beliefs that are extremely detrimental to them. An example is shaming people for calling in sick, working your whole life for little reward, believing that all problems have solution from an unseen force living in the sky, etc. These beliefs, as I’m sure many here can personally attest too, can really fuck a kid up and cause deep psychological damage. These BELIEFS are toxic, not the people. See how easy it is to reframe thi…
/r/MensRights11/11/23 05:38 PM
6

To me, this phrase means everything and nothing at the same time. I mean, I was born this way. Medically, I can't *not* be a man. And truth is, I'm trans. So it pains me. But you know, even if I weren't trans, I think I would still suffer from it. This heavy expectation of what being a 'man' means, on any given day, in modern society and throughout history. The expectation that, because I was born this way, I'm to use my larger build to help those smaller than me. The expectation that when my co…
/r/MensRights09/11/23 10:43 PM
23

You've been lied to. Feminism is female supremacy. If you're a feminist, you either understand this outright and support a radical ideology, or you're a useful idiot.
/r/MensRights08/11/23 10:03 PM
2

Simple shower thought: Neurodivergent people are more likely to be paranoid and 'feel' prosecuted/judged even when no one really gives a fuck. This is not to say that autistic people aren't judged, but that women are more anxious than men by far, and are probably misunderstanding the issue entirely.
/r/MensRights08/11/23 12:59 PM
86

You missed the point. It's not that sex is bad, it's that male sexuality is bad. Get on the female superiority bandwagon already, duh.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/10/23 02:40 AM
83

I'm going to say, the prevalence of misandry in the modern day. Men are assumed guilty by default, wearing the sins of the worst of us as a whole. If we're alone around children, we're presumed to be predators. If we're minding our own business on the street, it's assumed we're looking for trouble. If we're walking behind a woman, we're a potential threat. What a wretched, hateful society. There's no wonder why so many men feel bitterly alone.
/r/MensRights20/09/23 06:58 PM
18

Can you post a single example of any regular MRA on this subreddit hating women "just cause they are women"? Or are you just another concern troll doing what you're told?
/r/MensRights20/09/23 06:53 PM
23

The people in power are Capitalists. Pursuit of money is all that matters to them. Women control most of the households spending money and have more voting power than men, so capitalists attempt to court women's opinion rather than men's.
/r/MensRights20/09/23 06:51 PM
1

Progress? I mean, we're citing nearly ten year old studies in the article and it's painfully short, but at least there's an article at all.
/r/MensRights15/09/23 05:34 PM
1

Why refer to the elite as "the Man", except to be ironic and play on 60s stoner stereotypes? It seems reductive and antithetical to men coming together to defend their rights.
/r/MensRights12/09/23 11:48 PM
2

I think your premise is flawed. History was, for quite a while, might makes right. Men capable of dominating others often did so, and were revered lest you run afoul of the sharpest axe or largest army in the given area. As trade and barter systems moved to money and mercantilism, wealth became power. Those with enough money could simply buy their own armies or other people, while slavery was unfettered in the olden days. While it's true that men naturally dominate in a might makes right society…
/r/MensRights12/09/23 11:41 PM
2

I have seen many many men in my personal life happily take a back seat while the wife just thinks of everything You know what stereotype I hate? "Women are better at communicating than men" Despite the claim, women seem to be the most shit for communicating their needs before things fall apart. And to make things much worse on themselves and everyone around them, they act 'exhausted' by the act of asking for help. Single men have to manage 'the load' all themselves, as do single women. This hors…
/r/MensRights12/09/23 11:25 PM
0

And you can fuck right off with your divisive gatekeeping horseshit.
/r/MensRights12/09/23 06:47 PM
0

Words change meanings over time, or does that only count when the changes are politically correct? From your very first interaction in this thread, you prove yourself to be a bad actor. Everything that follows is trash. Conveniently you forgo most of my criticisms of the content and it's presentation to play semantics and confuse analogies for, what, showmanship? ​ 13:30 to 13:48? You've shown some pretty low marks for reading comprehension so far, so let's go over words that have meaning for th…
/r/MensRights12/09/23 03:23 PM
18

women have been liberated from traditional gender roles, not men As I've said many times and places before, women had a liberation movement, men never did. ​ neither liberals nor conservatives intends to change Are we talking US liberals or actual liberals? Because out on the fringes of the far left we're fighting for a heavily mechanized future where machines do much more of the labor than they do now and both men and women are free to pursue their personal motives much more vividly.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/09/23 02:55 PM
1

I took some classes on history or political science, or read many of the primary sources of Marx. Oh please. You cited YouTube videos are your inspiration for this misguided rant, and having watched some of them, I can clearly see you're just repeating some douche nozzle's opinion instead of having one of your own.
/r/MensRights12/09/23 03:41 AM
1

I mean, all of it's wrong. All of it. Every point where you reference Marxism, is incorrect. Where to even begin? How did you come to these conclusions? Those stupid videos by Ryan Chapman? It's far easier for both of us that I tell you to go read Marx yourself instead of getting your opinions from YouTube. Come on now. Be a grown up.
/r/MensRights12/09/23 03:39 AM
0

Marx is difficult to read Do you think that's a valid excuse for being ignorant and accepting other people's opinions of an author instead of reading an author's work? ​ Apparently businesses will run themselves and all the long hours by the capitalist business owners to keep these businesses operating can be eliminated with no issues. I don't know if you're aware, but technology moves quickly. The military of late World War 2 was within spitting distance of having fully autonomous factories, li…
/r/MensRights12/09/23 02:53 AM
1

Really? Some rando wrote a supposed 'proof' when step 2 is intuition? Nevermind the atrocious 'sign in to continue reading' pop-up that plagues the site. It's really hard to call this a "discussion" when it's literally just one guy's opinion, some charts, and a comment section he hasn't bothered to respond to. But honestly, what does this have to do with men's rights?
/r/MensRights12/09/23 02:40 AM
2

Wew lad. I feel like that cavalcade of projection and hate Shoe featured in her video could've used a small warning message. At least the overall tone was jovial and made fun of the obvious psychosis afoot with some of those folks.
/r/MensRights12/09/23 02:24 AM
2

Hey clown, was this your video? You seem to take my takedown personally, yet like the video, offer no real substance or alternative. Maybe try addressing my comments instead of making assumptions about why I've been posting here for longer than you've had an account.
/r/MensRights12/09/23 02:17 AM
4

Jesus christ what a fucking shit show. Man spends over five minutes redefining words that already have accepted definitions before meandering around to his supposed point. You cannot talk about Marxism without talking about CAPITALISM. Six minutes of this diatripe before he reveals the dog and pony show in that he's redefined liberalism as capitalism. Horse shit. "Cultural Marxism" is absolutely a right-wing conspiracy dog whistle and this smarmy asshole is nothing more than the latest talking h…
/r/MensRights12/09/23 01:47 AM
2

You.. uh.. you don't understand Marxism very well there dude. Misandry stems from female supremacy, plain and simple. Whether the original misandrists were damaged by personal experience, the following sheep that uphold their hateful and paranoid beliefs often have no legitimate reason to hate all men and cannot separate the individual from the mass. Maybe you should try actually reading Marx instead of watching videos from random people with their own agendas. Marx was largely about worker's ri…
/r/MensRights10/09/23 07:02 PM
2

I'll summarize my thoughts as this: Capitalism is incompatible with a highly mechanized society. You cannot put automation back in the bag. If you leave it up to private industry, they will replace government, and then your democracy and civil liberties really go away.
/r/MensRights03/09/23 02:34 PM
-1

The point of this thread is that young men are suffering, and you whip out this zero substance anecdote: ​ insisting it's the problem when it is, in fact, the solution Tell me how cancer doesn't kill the patient with its constant need for endless growth. Go ahead. You're so drunk on the poison you're afraid of the cure. You aren't the first, you won't be the last.
/r/MensRights03/09/23 02:19 PM
5

In some ways, yes, but other ways, less than ever; the LGBT community is no less acquisitive, authoritarian, or intolerant than the "tradcons" you want to be different from. I, uh.. what? What? Virtually every community has its share of regressives. Not sure why on earth you chose LGBT for your example, or singled out "me" as "wanting to be different"? WTF mate? ​ Lots of places have managed it; we'll see if they can hang on, but predictably, their systems are now giving better results than ours…
/r/MensRights03/09/23 02:17 PM
-2

Useless platitudes, like popular sayings, contribute nothing to the conversation. The sooner more trad-cons wake up to this, the sooner we can actually use our intellectual superiority above animals to bypass so-called "human nature". Your "fundamental realities" have nothing but anecdotes to back them up, yet the same people will scream that sociology is a "soft science".
/r/MensRights03/09/23 01:59 PM
3

Capitalism was a HUGE improvement over Mercantalism Capitalism was also the driving force behind continuing slavery as we moved from feudal warlords taking prisoners of war to buying and selling people as commodities. Many bloody revolts had to occur before the ruling class finally agreed not to outright enslave people for their debts. Unfortunately, the winners write the history books, and most people fail to realize how much suffering Capitalism has caused overall, instead only pointing to fai…
/r/MensRights03/09/23 01:56 PM
-2

In other words, the problem is Capitalism. The sooner more men wake up to this, the sooner we can tear the system down and rebuild something suitable for our modern world.
/r/MensRights03/09/23 01:31 PM
2

Natural byproduct of Capitalism and Feminism dominating the landscape. If only 1% of the population controls most of the world's wealth, that truly means that only 1% is the most viable for taking care of a significant number of offspring. Mix in female supremacy mentality that women should only be dating/sleeping with "the cream of the crop" and yeah... This is the result. Under Capitalism, resources are too scarce for the average woman to be wasting time and effort on "average" men. Japan is n…
/r/MensRights03/09/23 01:24 PM
71

Uh oh. He said the quiet part out loud. Pretty sure he's going to realize that 95% of all feminist complaints are projection from a place of privilege, before too long. If you haven't figured out that women control men and vastly influence their decision making by the time you've hit 20 years old, I dare say you might be 'sheltered'.
/r/MensRights28/08/23 12:57 AM
9

Feminism is an immediate deal breaker. Doesn't matter how pretty you are ladies, if you personality is shit, you're not going to make it very far. Failure to recognize that you're actively or passively participating in a female supremacist cult that profits off of man hating merchandise means you're too stupid for me. It's just called having standards, man.
/r/MensRights28/08/23 12:48 AM
5

There's many reasons. Women are people too. I'd argue that many girls experience INTENSE peer pressure from other girls to conform to social norms in school and that includes having 'acceptable' interests. So boy things, nerdy things, 'unpopular' things become off limits to those concerned with social status, and needless to say, most women are concerned with social status. It seems to be biological to some extent as they've been putting on parties and trying to one up each other with fancy dres…
/r/MensRights25/08/23 06:57 PM
22

Men are so marginalized by society that their self interest is a subculture. LULZ.
/r/MensRights24/08/23 08:01 PM
22

Garbage in, garbage out. All we can do is make sure people realize the "report" is biased itself so they correctly ignore it.
/r/MensRights23/08/23 06:36 PM
2

I automatically disregard women who use the phrase 'nice guy' to describe anything other than an actually nice person. THEY'RE CALLED ASSHOLES. Your inability to figure them out does not make them nice guys, nor do their supposed claims to be one. They were assholes, they were always assholes, you just didn't pick up on it. If your male friend turned out to be an asshole, maybe you're worse at social skills than you thought. Don't befriend assholes and you won't suffer their bullshit. Super simp…
/r/MensRights23/08/23 09:56 AM
3

"Biological advantage" might be strong wording in hindsight, but I was referring to the fact that men appreciate looking at women more than women appreciate looking at men. I was thinking of bikini and underwear specifically and not high fashion when I was referencing modeling. Maybe it would be more applicable to porn actors and actresses instead.
/r/MensRights21/08/23 05:18 AM
10

I mean, it's a failure of the education system, surely. How do sports teams operate? They aren't publicly funded. Sports teams that excel at their sport are sponsored by companies to advertise their brands and products. It just so happens that men dominate sports due to our biological advantage. You don't see male models demanding equal pay as the top women's models, even though women dominate modeling due to women's biological advantage. If you want to pay players equally, that's fine IMO, but …
/r/MensRights20/08/23 09:17 PM
53

Seems to me that "demographic parity" just introduces noise into reliable statistics. Why are we teaching calculators how to calculate things poorly?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/08/23 07:03 PM
83

Make no mistake, Feminism is and always has been about female superiority. 'Equality' was just a sleight of hand show before it was replaced with 'Equity'. Feminism comes from a place of belief that women are owed something because they're women. It's bigotry 101.
/r/MensRights18/08/23 11:30 PM
15

Welcome. This may not be the ideal place for men to vent, but it IS a safe space for men to talk about "complicated" issues concerning women and self-image. It's definitely NOT okay for people to hit one another, unless they've agreed upon something with a safe word. Same goes for biting, leaving bruises, or anything that makes you feel uncomfortable, either physically or mentally/emotionally. I was personally abused by a very abrasive black woman in the past, and it left deep psychological scar…
/r/MensRights18/08/23 09:35 PM
1

Howdy. Older millennial here. I've thought about what I want in a woman, but I've pretty much given up on ever finding it, even though I don't feel my standards are very high at all. -She must be trustworthy. No games, no big lies, no loose lips. I don't kiss and tell, I would expect the same. Our secrets stay between us. -She must be responsible. If she's given a task, she gets it done. If she makes a mistake, she owns up to it. -She should be smart. If she doesn't know about something, she sho…
/r/MensRights17/08/23 08:10 AM
5

They could say the same thing for Feminism. They won't, of course, slaughter their sacred cow and admit the damage that it has done to young women, no no. MotherJones is a feminist rag, so we must trump up how boys are in trouble and crisis but offer no solutions except feminist dogma. I have very little doubt that this place fills men with dread. Look at all of the examples of women behaving like goddamn psychopaths, sometimes literally getting away with murder, all while men in Ukraine and Rus…
/r/MensRights15/08/23 11:59 PM
22

No, you're absolutely right. A simple overview of most TERF talking points illustrates clear hysteria surrounding their personal fear/hatred of men 'disguised' as women, and women who have 'betrayed their gender' by transitioning. Feminism is a hateful ideology because it harbors hateful sects. You can't surround yourself with bigots and then claim to be righteous.
/r/MensRights14/08/23 08:51 AM
18

What a shit article. Not a single mention of social security programs running dry or the inability of people able to afford home ownership. Just a lot of shrugging and nothing. Did we even get a single pull quote from leadership about what they intend to do about the issue? Of course not. Fuck this shitty country, it's horrible leadership, it's repugnant corporate owned media, and it's clearly failing infrastructure.
/r/MensRights13/08/23 09:45 PM
29

You've been conditioned by gynocentrism to find men's distress comedic. Welcome to the first steps of undoing that damage.
/r/MensRights12/08/23 09:17 PM
3

Here you go bro, happy history lesson lol https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/i-was-only-pretending-to-be-retarded
/r/MensRights12/08/23 09:13 PM
2

Hilarious. Make yourself look high maintenance to scare off potential suitors. Reminds me of the "I was just acting retarded" meme from the old internet. It's called 'being tacky', girls. Look it up. That's you.
/r/MensRights12/08/23 02:23 PM
12

I disagree. Something breaks inside you when you lose the will to live. That's not in any way normal or healthy. If a broken bone or internal bleeding counts as a physical health issue, I don't see how having a broken will to live is any different as a mental health issue. IMO, this person is just perpetuating the stigma that mental illness makes people, particularly men, weak.
/r/MensRights11/08/23 04:30 PM
4

I'm sure all "radicals" consider their cause good, no matter how history remembers them. I disagree with your opinion that it's a failure of rhetoric to grip people to our cause though. A lot of what we deal with is indoctrination from societal norms that have evolved more recently under a decidedly gynocentric direction. This issue isn't that we're failing to appeal to people's emotions, it's that we're fighting against the level of deep rooted beliefs that are on par with other political subje…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/08/23 06:41 PM
16

Sometimes I feel that the men vs women war that we are observing today is artificially pushed by the elites, sort of divide and conquer, to divert the attention of the masses It absolutely is. There's no reasonable explanation for why Hollywood and the news media sponsoring the insufferable amount of anti-male sentiment without influence from their very wealthy shareholders. Anti-consumerism messages don't float in the capitalist sea, and that's why any time there's riots in France over pay or m…
/r/MensRights09/08/23 05:47 PM
69

It was the elites against everyone else. Being a man meant shit when you were not the elite or the upper class. It still is. We've just been so divided by racism and sexism that everyone magically stopped paying attention to the most destructive ism of all, classism. Makes you think.
/r/MensRights09/08/23 05:34 PM
2

Hey there. In my opinion, anyone who identifies as a man should be a part of this community. These are your rights we're talking about. Women are welcome to advocate and discuss men's issues as well, but expect pushback when talking to men about lived experiences as men. The longer you live as a man, the more you'll know about our unique struggles. I'm trans as well. I'd much rather be a biological woman, and if it were affordable and simple to do so, I'd leap at the chance. Unfortunately, I'm o…
/r/MensRights06/08/23 03:27 PM
2

I have very little empathy for married men and unwilling fathers who 'find out' their mate is a "bitch". Control your damn dick! Don't stick it in crazy. Only goddamn fools weigh 18 years of commitment against a night of fun and choose to go in raw. Thirsty motherfuckers are some of the worst men on the planet. These simps prop up the YAS QUEEN culture that permeates some of the most narcissistic women's social circles. Deadbeat dads of the near future.
/r/MensRights06/08/23 03:06 PM
17

It's only natural. You weigh down western women with a few generations of bullshit baggage and men are going to look for a less broken counterpart. Take responsibility women, you fucked yourselves with a revisionist history to justify man hate. Now men are looking for partners that don't hate them. It's not difficult to figure out.
/r/MensRights05/08/23 04:38 AM
6

Why are you engaging with bigots? They’re indoctrinated idiots. Post your relevant statistics and walk away. That’s all you can do.
/r/MensRights03/08/23 07:42 PM
145

What part of the subtext "men are bad" are you missing?
/r/MensRights03/08/23 03:46 PM
4

I mean, Capitalism? When women's liberation happened, the average woman was chasing the ideal of the rich white man without the responsibility or work involved. Men's liberation never happened. We are bound by the traditions that make makes right, and the unflattering reality that money is power. The more money you have, the more freedoms you have.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/08/23 03:38 PM
10

Important information like this highlights and underscores why the very concept of "The Patriarchy" is not just a far flung fantasy, but ultimately a sign of projection from the actual advantaged and privileged gender. Society virtually hemorrhages money at women's special interests. From government bodies, to scholarship opportunities, to charities and hollywood. I encourage every man to dismiss "The Patriarchy" as a farcical conspiracy theory designed for morons. It should be balked at openly,…
/r/MensRights23/07/23 05:24 PM
7

Joke of an an opinion piece. All this thinly veiled fear mongering about how 'the left' seeks to destroy monogamy and marriage. Not much evidence, no smoking gun. Why even title the article except for click bait? What exactly has 'the right' done for men except exploit them as dirt cheap labor and send them off to war? Both American parties are utter shit, for their own special ways. What the author failed to latch onto was that no one, not even the person paid to write this dribble, knows how t…
/r/MensRights18/07/23 07:41 PM
3

You really have to research and not be afraid to fire your therapist at any moment. ​ Unlike many here, I actually advise therapy and psychology to most as I feel we live in a deeply sick, stressful society. But everything you've said is true, especially the last part. You have to "shop around". I'm 40, and it took me over 30 years to get an accurate diagnosis of extreme neglect by my abusive mother. 30 years! But now I'm getting the help I've always needed, and it's because I kept shopping arou…
/r/MensRights18/07/23 03:58 PM
3

Unfortunately, there's a lot of noise in the self help world. I cannot personally recommend any authors nor idols to aspire by that aren't long dead and largely irrelevant to the struggles of a modern American (I assume) young male. If you don't have a good friend to talk to to work out things like hobbies and life goals, consider shopping around for a counselor or life coach. Avoid feminist trappings of trying to 'redefine masculinity'. Getting in touch with your emotions and understanding your…
/r/MensRights16/07/23 07:42 PM
3

You've written an awful lot to say relatively little, which is never a good look. I speak from experience of course, and it's why I try to limit myself these days. I would say more succinctly this: Women had a sexual liberation movement. Men never did. And although Christian puritan attitudes were prevalent in shaping thinking in the West, the general control of men as workers and soldiers is neither exclusive to the West nor the modern world. In my opinion, Men have been restrained by gender ro…
/r/MensRights10/07/23 06:51 AM
3

Feminism already broke all of the age barriers when it comes to peddling their misinformation, so why gate any of it? You can't put the genie back in the bottle. Trad-cons have this weird position that children are going to immediately try something out if they learn about it. Only if you raise shit kids! Smart kids understand consequences of their actions and take measured approaches so they don't get humiliated in front of their peers. 18 is arbitrary bullshit. You start going through puberty …
/r/MensRights08/07/23 03:59 PM
1

If it's not okay to joke about women with small breasts, it's not okay to joke about men with small dicks. Speak out against sexism. That's all you can do.
/r/MensRights08/07/23 03:25 PM
12

It's pure projection. Feminism has been indoctrinating young women for generations now, to the degree that they've even got a revisionist history going of how rape used to be socially acceptable (lolwut) and women were constantly treated like property (nope). They've twisted language, lied through academia, and deliberately excluded men from virtually every "social progress" they've claimed. After years of being dogged by feminist dogma, young men are now listening to alternatives. That scares t…
/r/MensRights04/07/23 03:54 PM
3

I think that over 90% of what motivates "evil" people is, in fact, mental illness. Sociopathy, psychopathy, extreme narcissism, extreme greed, pathological fear, etc... These are all clearly documented and identifiable "illnesses" at worst and personality defects at best. The fact remains that we, as healthy human beings, have identified the worst traits of humanity as being deviant, rather than normalized. So yes, absolutely. Mental illness is the primary culprit here. Some people will balk at …
/r/MensRights01/07/23 06:01 PM
9

It means they're a parroting piece of shit that believes male sexuality is inherently wicked. They've been conditioned to believe that men admiring women is somehow vile and dehumanizing. They're idiot feminists that have been indoctrinated into believing that "staring" is the gateway drug to rape. As others have stated, the best reply to this is "Treat women like men", and watch that kettle boil over.
/r/MensRights01/07/23 05:47 PM
34

Why the fuck is this in Time? Jesus fucking Christ the news media these days... Of all the shit you could waste time and energy on publishing to INFORM THE PUBLIC ABOUT THE WORLD, we get one woman's romantic mistakes. This is me, downgrading Time from 'once respectable publication' to 'Tabloid Bullshit'.
/r/MensRights26/06/23 07:59 PM
1

Wow, what a shit take. I have a long history of posting on this sub, and care deeply about men's issues. Who the fuck are you? Face it kid, if you can't understand why Capitalism harms men and why the economy is also intrinsically linked to Men's health and happiness in life, you're out of your depth. Leave the conversation, you were not equipped to play with this league.
/r/MensRights26/06/23 07:49 PM
75

I think anyone with even passing familiarity of the feminist rhetoric used from the 70s onward has been raising hysteria amongst women about their safety. It's spiraled out of control, and gone from "hey, learn how to defend yourself" to "any stare longer than X seconds is basically threatening to rape you", and it was impossible for women to begin feeling this way without also openly shaming men for having wholly natural impulses ( You wear a low cut top, I look. That's your choice ). The ongoi…
/r/MensRights26/06/23 07:42 PM
15

There's very few allowances for male deviants to call a "safe space". We're second class citizens. The ruling class maintain a stranglehold on the dialog around social issues these days. To show nuance is to be an extremist. Useful puppets gain feelings of satisfaction from shutting down and shouting down alternative lifestyles. Same as it always was, really. They just keep taking on larger and larger targets to suppress and marginalize.
/r/MensRights26/06/23 02:11 AM
3

I was going to reply directly but this probably suffices. Brilliant set of comments there mate. Oi, thanks for the compliment. It's nice to know some people read the long-ass shit I write. :)
/r/MensRights26/06/23 02:04 AM
2

Again, I'm not an economic scholar, I'm a college educated US peasant. So feel free to take what I say with a grain of salt. I've done "research", but certainly not enough to confidently publish a paper on the matter. This is an internet forum, this is my opinion. First, the simple question is not so simple. The US does NOT have a lean, tech-savvy government behind it. We're beholden to special interests to the point where we still have to file our own taxes, other countries handle it automatica…
/r/MensRights25/06/23 09:24 PM
5

I think your question is going too far, too fast, and that's often what frightens people away from the subject entirely. We live in a very difficult time for information and classical theory. News and social media are constantly bombarding even average citizens with a stream of opinionated information that often detracts from the truth to serve a political agenda. Historic examples, present to this day in nordic countries, demonstrate positively that a well regulated capitalist market can exist …
/r/MensRights25/06/23 08:29 PM
0

I'm going to frame this slightly differently. Capitalism hates losers, it wants to beat them down and take all their resources. Capitalism loves victims, it wants to appeal to them and take all their resources. Why is this relevant? Because men have always been the workhorse of society. Capitalism gobbles up workers, robs them of their time by paying them unfairly, erodes their sanity with minimal sick days and time off, and further shrinks the American family by denying flexible schedules for r…
/r/MensRights25/06/23 07:12 PM
6

Bingo. As a Classical Liberal myself, I fucking despise what's become of the Democratic party in the US. I certainly didn't want impotent union-busting Biden in office, but when the alternative is the Republicans... I simply don't feel represented by my country's officials or media anymore.
/r/MensRights25/06/23 07:02 PM
-3

Let me introduce you to a magic trick. "what can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence." Poof. You never had a point and you never will.
/r/MensRights25/06/23 04:21 PM
-5

It's a feedback loop. You were fed misinformation, which you continue to feed others. You made an assertion without the slightest bit of evidence and expected your opinion to go unquestioned? Come on now. You didn't even provide a personal anecdote. This is a public place. You're embarrassing yourself. Prove that you're somehow different from your own claims and exercise some critical thought here. Tell me what you believe and why. Not what you heard someone on the news tell you, but in your own…
/r/MensRights25/06/23 04:16 PM
7

I think in order to better understand this topic, we have to define what is "the Left", because it's really several different groups lumped under the name for different reasons. Classic Liberalism is a rare and precious thing in the West. It speaks to worker's rights, civil liberties, freedoms for all including freedom of speech, and an economic free market. Classic liberals are few and far between in political representation in the US because the US has generally shifted farther and farther Rig…
/r/MensRights25/06/23 04:10 PM
-2

The right have been indoctrinated, some may say brainwashed, and are no longer able to think for themselves. It’s far easier and much comfortable for them to embrace conservative views foisted on them by the christian, capitalist culture. They don’t have the capacity for independent views or critical thought. ​ Thoughts?
/r/MensRights25/06/23 03:13 PM
1

Hey kid, wanna see a magic trick? “What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence.” Boy, you are dismissed.
/r/MensRights24/06/23 03:50 AM
0

Speak up boy, you're garbled with all that rightwing cock in your mouth. If you could stop being a media cuckold for five seconds of your pathetic life, you might realize that you've been lied to by talking heads and historical revisionists. Do you honestly think the US has a "Marxist" presence that influences the laws and economics of this country? We're the most Capitalist shithole in the fucking world, unparalleled. How exactly does a political party (note: Marxism is not a political party) t…
/r/MensRights23/06/23 11:41 PM
0

No sensible reply to citations. Figures. Waste someone else's time with conspiracy theories.
/r/MensRights23/06/23 11:08 PM
1

You didn't actually read my post, did you? No, instead you defended OP by doing EXACTLY what he did. Guilt by association "marxists feminists". Do you know how many "self described as such" Republicans are earnestly waiting for the end of days to solve America's problems? Yeah, in addition to trickle-down economics which has done everything to expand corporate power and influence in this country while undermining individual freedoms, the long term plans of "conservatives" is to literally wait fo…
/r/MensRights23/06/23 04:47 PM
46

While I would agree that male disposability plays a somewhat large part in the apathy of men's suffering, I honestly don't think that this particular incident has deep rooted ties to actual misandry. Personally, I couldn't care less. A tiny handful of people that were *extremely* well off to even think of taking this completely recreational and unnecessary dangerous trip, died rather quickly after taking an extreme risk. Nevermind the EXTREME media bias in covering this incident versus the 300 d…
/r/MensRights23/06/23 04:33 PM
1

Oh no! Marxism! So scary! These hypocritical conservative shitheads try to damn people by associating them with Marx as if the man was worse than Hitler, while never holding Capitalists accountable for the destruction of the family unit by eroding the single earner household away to nothing. "Marxism is out to get you!" is a conspiracy theory for retards. Conservatives will screw you at every turn is a pattern demonstrated over and over by very recent history. Wake up.
/r/MensRights23/06/23 04:35 AM
1

Unfortunately, there is a contingency of confused people on this sub (and in reality in general) that fail to understand the pursuit of equality is inherently a liberal concept. And said people mistake anything liberal as being inherently bad because they've been indoctrinated. The "modern liberal agenda" has a lot of problems with it, mostly being conflated with the female supremacy that is feminism and a lot of virtue signalling nonsense about respecting people's imaginary genders and enabling…
/r/MensRights22/06/23 03:48 PM
-1

Amen. Ultimately, Capitalism and equality are at odds because Capitalism enables and thrives upon the dichotomy of a ruling class and a serving class. The pursuit of wealth is never and will never be part of masculinity. But a lot of capitalist assholes will deliberately conflate the two in order to exploit the young, the stupid, and the confused.
/r/MensRights22/06/23 02:49 PM
8

Even as a woman i fear that this word is getting more value than it deserves You're starting to see through the bullshit, eh? Next, try examining the other language that has been used to spread alarm. "Rape culture", "Patriarchy", and "systemic oppression" being some popular choices.
/r/MensRights14/06/23 07:14 PM
-1

Men's issues fall under men's rights. Period. If you're being treated differently because you're a man, a man, a "man", a man, or a man, then you're included in our movement. If you don't understand this, you're either an irredeemable jackass, or deliberately stupid. This isn't feminism. We will not make space for "exclusive" rights and privileges. We do not need gatekeepers.
/r/MensRights13/06/23 09:33 PM
1

Oh dear. ​ Do I have to introduce you to TERFs? ​ Don't for a second think that trans-women 'get the nod' because of gynocentrism.
/r/MensRights13/06/23 09:09 PM
11

While I agree that the poor conditions many of our veterans experience, particularly later in life, needs more awareness and public support... "Pride" is about awareness and mutual understanding for less common sexualities and differently gendered persons. Like racism, discrimination against LGBT individuals continues to be a problem in our modern world. That, IMO, is why we have a month. No one gets the month off, companies just dress up and run promotions while the government gives lip service…
/r/MensRights07/06/23 07:16 PM
92

In other news, sky blue, water wet. News at 11.
/r/MensRights26/05/23 04:44 AM
1

Oh, I'm aware now. I've been in and out of therapy since I was a child to treat major depressive disorder. Only once I started to dig into the nightmares and flashbacks did I receive a diagnosis of Complex PTSD for long term neglect. I'm about as okay as a damaged child gets, I suppose.
/r/MensRights20/05/23 12:33 PM
1

Absolutely. Men are an afterthought of society.
/r/MensRights11/05/23 02:12 AM
37

Feminists are known bad actors that lie and smear our cause. Why on earth would they agree to a neutral arena when they control the discourse on their subs? I don't think you understand why they're our enemy.
/r/MensRights09/05/23 05:41 AM
10

"I have heard this from so many women getting used by men for sex then thrown away." So after listening to what scorned women had to say about men, you came to a conclusion and now you're trying to ask me their opinion? Seems kind of backasswards if you ask me. Men who are into hookups are fools. Masturbate or hire a professional, it's cheaper, less risky in terms of STDs including kids, and there's no emotional manipulation involved. If you want to nut without commitment, dating is the worst po…
/r/MensRights09/05/23 12:01 AM
3

In my experience, only my father and grandfather attempted to shame me for acting or behaving certain ways. Even then, it was very few and far between. I don't know that I've ever been shamed for my emotional state by a man outside of immediate family. I'd say most men in my experience, when presented with emotions they don't know how to deal with, will just become distant. Stoicism is hammered into young boys early. "Big boys don't cry" came squarely from mom and grandmom. You wouldn't believe …
/r/MensRights07/05/23 09:13 PM
1

Why practice something that brings no joy. They've been indoctrinated by the Capitalist's game. Despite how statistically implausible it is for everyone participating to "win", they insist that enduring the rigorous path towards excellence and high standards will somehow pay off in the end. It's the hard work delusion. Combine with a victim complex, which is hardwired into modern feminism, and you get people competing to be the most oppressed under the guise they'll be the most rewarded for thei…
/r/MensRights06/05/23 05:04 PM
3

Women, not just feminists but ALL women, seem to embrace in-group bias and stranger danger more than men do, period. This automatically lends itself to an "us vs them" mentality when it comes to gender related topics. Unfortunately, yes, Feminism is a capitalist institution at this point and America is nothing but undermined by capitalists motivations instead of its people. "Conservative" values are ineffective backwater bullshit rooted in traditionalism rather than rationality or any sort of so…
/r/MensRights04/05/23 10:09 AM
4

Terrible people commit sexual assault. It's no mistake that attractive people are often found committing fraud, adultery, or other forms of high profile lying and manipulation. They feel they can get away with it, that's why they do it. It is, as mentioned in other comments, the Halo effect. However, the extent of which is evolutionary versus that's which sociological is heavily up for debate. There's no question that the media glamorizes physical attractiveness as a sign of success, conflated w…
/r/MensRights04/05/23 09:51 AM
10

Reddit is a microcosm for reality at large, like it or not. Society refuses to acknowledge the decline of males.
/r/MensRights04/05/23 09:24 AM
11

I don't speak for many of us, being the weird liberal socialist trans-woman member of the group, but I do speak up from time to time. Anyone is perfectly welcome to participate in discussions here, and you're encouraged to join and post frequently if you feel comfortable doing so. Rules exist for a reason, so you'll see we prefer Men's Rights content over just any anti-feminist content, but the two align quite often. There's a small contingency of folks who don't get along very well amongst our …
/r/MensRights03/05/23 08:09 PM
3

I've struggled with depression since I was a child, and I'm over 40 now; so trust me when I say I've seen quite a few doctors of the psych variety. And you're right, there's a lot of them that view the world through a feminist lens and have a very poor understanding of men's troubles. That's why I included the small warning to be conscious of your provider's biases. Many providers may be 'tainted' by western pop culture, but the field as a whole is not unsalvageable. I've worked through a lot of…
/r/MensRights24/04/23 01:59 PM
6

You are correct. Edited my post.
/r/MensRights24/04/23 11:36 AM
11

Shit. 1 in the morning mistake, I got it backwards. You're correct, I'll alter my post.
/r/MensRights24/04/23 11:33 AM
23

I'm going to make a suggestion that I would give to most anyone suffering with anger, fear, trust, or despair issues. See a psychologist . Not just a therapist, but an accredited doctorate holding Psychologist. A therapist will give you tips and tricks to handle your life, a psychiatrist will give you medication if you need to lessen your symptoms, but a Psychologist will be able to help you identify and begin to treat the pathological fear/hatred you've developed from countless years of Western…
/r/MensRights24/04/23 08:10 AM
13

I'd say that this is direct evidence that Feminism is a female supremacy movement rather than an equality movement. When women lobby for services, they lobby for women, and because of a largely manufactured specter of 'oppression', they get away with it. Men are not allowed to lobby for men's only services, the very idea is considered sexist. The egalitarian solution is to lobby for HUMAN rights and services, codifying laws and regulations to apply to all persons, regardless of their identifying…
/r/MensRights11/03/23 01:42 AM
7

Consider that this is a public forum and your replies are under scrutiny from more than myself. I didn’t downvote your request for a citation, I was having lunch. But since you’ve got your panties in such a twist, I’ll just drop the first available result from Google instead of playing your games any longer. https://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2014/11/06/we-should-stop-putting-women-in-jail-for-anything/ Peace out.
/r/MensRights14/02/23 08:34 PM
6

Honestly, if you were here to provide any substance to either side of the conversation, you could have. Instead, you have this intellectually dishonest position of dismissing things you dislike as “psychotic” without even so much as a moment of entertaining the notion or asking for citations. I wouldn’t have to go far to find examples of #KillAllMen or the article written last year by a prominent feminist suggesting prison was “wrong” for women. But I omitted hunting down evidence for my asserti…
/r/MensRights14/02/23 08:16 PM
6

Feminism teaches women that they are competition with men. It teaches women a revisionist history where women were “basically slaves” to husbands they uniformly hated. Feminism prides itself not on equality, but equity, and the notion of reparations for past wrongdoings. The worst feminists would posit that all penile insertion is a form of rape, while simultaneously arguing that women cannot rape men. The most privileged gender on earth routinely argues that their crimes should be held to a dif…
/r/MensRights14/02/23 07:57 PM
-4

Actual Marxists believe in actual equality. Feminists are female supremacists. What you’ve done is combine things you think are bad because it makes for a bigger baddie. Like “godless commie”. Even a passing glance at the amount of grifters there are professing to be feminist authorities should unequivocally demonstrate how much the average feminist is your typical capitalist looking to exploit any situation for personal gain.
/r/MensRights14/02/23 07:41 PM
8

Let’s face it: there is a rash of young men who would rather be women because being a male in modern society suuuuucks. And modern psychology hasn’t really taken this to heart yet.
/r/MensRights08/02/23 09:12 PM
0

Ridiculous. No one has yet to cite their sources on “human nature”, because there is no scientific foundation for the concept. You may as well argue for “god’s plan”, it’s fucking nonsense.
/r/MensRights22/01/23 08:19 PM
-3

Seriously though, people like you who drag out wild conspiracies against feminism do little but drive away the people who know better. It’s detrimental to our movement to take the soap box and preach ignorant opinions. If you gave an actual shit about what you’re preaching, your reaction should have been alarm bells when someone pops up saying one of your major points does not exist. Instead, you disregarded the criticism you allegedly wanted by posting in the first place.
/r/MensRights22/01/23 03:02 AM
-5

Two short points: There is no such thing as “human nature”. You know nothing about Marxism. The rest is trash.
/r/MensRights22/01/23 02:20 AM
19

Women reinforcing each other's ignorance. Nothing new, not even really 'woke' honestly...
/r/MensRights04/01/23 10:25 PM
6

As an older non-transitioning transwoman, I can't help but give a jaded snicker at this young tumblr trans pup. I was born when being trans was still unspoken ground. You had cross-dressers and 'sissyboys', but the full idea of someone being 'the wrong gender' in body versus mind simply hadn't taken root yet in the cultural consciousness of the culturally progressive west. I remember looking up transitioning on Compuserv groups, back before there was a proper web. The.. underground LGBT movement…
/r/MensRights27/12/22 08:54 PM
11

Thank you, genuinely. I had the idea but not the right word. It happens.
/r/MensRights25/12/22 11:52 PM
63

MAD LAD DROPS BOMBS ​ For real though, academia is the one absolute bastion of the best candidate for the job should take highest precedent. All other metrics aside, gender, sexuality, race, what have you... If you're a fucking Grade A genius at the top of your field, you deserve recognition for that. If ANYONE is being 'short listed' into top positions of academic merit by any other criteria, then the whole field is thrown into question.
/r/MensRights25/12/22 09:48 PM
1

It's weird for me to have internet randos checking up on things, particularly after so many years, but there's no harm in being honest I suppose. 6 years is practically a lifetime ago. Long story short, I did not pass my classes. My great aunt was nice enough to bestow some money to me, which I used to move from Alaska back to Washington. It was a risky venture, but somehow I landed on my feet. After renting a room off of craigslist for two months, I managed to land a veritable dream job working…
/r/MensRights15/12/22 09:14 PM
25

Maybe. But "Hollywood" operates on a different set of rules from the rest of us. I remember something Will Smith did that should've been an obvious charge of assault in front of an audience of millions, but hey... turn the other cheek or some bullshit.
/r/MensRights10/12/22 12:23 AM
183

Yet another pathetic example of women behaving badly being normalized and excused. Any male actor seeking to make excuses to kiss a female star would be ridiculed as desperate, degenerate, and "creepy". But a female actor does it and it gets an "oh you" reaction from the press like she's a precocious toddler. When do you suppose society is going to hold women accountable for their actions?
/r/MensRights09/12/22 08:58 PM
4

Short answer: wide spread behavior and previous mistakes. Psychology is one of those more modern sciences since we simply didn’t have the means to properly study the brain or widespread behavioral trends prior to the past hundred years or so. Arguably due to this, the skeletons in early psychology medicine’s closet are large and terrible. Particularly in the American culture that seems to prefer punishment over rehabilitation, labeling something semi-common as a mental illness risks misdiagnosis…
/r/MensRights25/11/22 08:49 PM
24

Here's my take on the "females" thing. Men and boys don't care about what they're called. If you call a boy a man, you're effectively complimenting their maturity. If you call a man a boy, you're implying he's immature but that's not necessarily a bad thing. Just one of the boys, and all that. If you call a woman a girl, you're insulting her "womanhood". If you call a girl a woman, you're calling her old. So women want to be called women and girls want to be called girls, and heaven help you if …
/r/MensRights24/11/22 07:55 AM
2

As I’ve said before, I’m an egalitarian at my core, but I’m an MRA first because I’m a man. I have lived experiences of abuse through the male lens. I have fewer support structures and suffer loneliness in a way I would argue is uniquely male. I receive less assistance from social programs as a male. I can speak to MRA issues because I have lived them. I support women’s rights because I am egalitarian. I rebuke feminism because it is a female supremacy movement that actively disenfranchises pro-…
/r/MensRights06/11/22 01:26 AM
5

I find that some women are absolutely obsessed about how they're portrayed in various aspects of media, quick to blame male creators and excuse female creators in the creative process. Conversely, women don't seem particularly interested in being accurate or fair in depicting men in media. Just another double standard.
/r/MensRights05/11/22 05:23 AM
17

Let's be entirely real here. Rather than coming to logical conclusions through research and identifying the nature of the problems they face, Feminism adopted "the Patriarchy". It's a fucking cult for female supremacy. Not a civil rights movement.
/r/MensRights02/11/22 02:31 AM
45

Divisive drivel. The right only cares about gender roles in so far as they need obedient workers and "the nuclear family" was a blueprint in delivering young, dumb, indoctrinated Americans into whatever office job cookie cutter template corporate interests lobbied for. No amount of pining for the good ol' days is going to make them magically reappear. Masculinity doesn't need to be fixed, it needs to be defined by modern role models. More than anything, we cannot let women try to argue what masc…
/r/MensRights30/10/22 06:53 AM
9

IMO, all testing in public school should be logically definitive information. True or false, named locations, mathematical problems, you get it, right? Answers which are not up for argument or interpretation. Make the curriculum on a computer, and have the test answers pre-determined. No human bias. Save the subjective arguments and lived experiences for college.
/r/MensRights18/10/22 07:40 PM
6

Honestly, I think that therapy is too generalized as it is now. There's a surplus of female counselors which are poorly equipped to handle male patients, and I know first hand having been through over a dozen counselors over thirty years. I'm a staunch supporter of equality and providing an even playing field for everyone (with special support for those of special needs), but even as much as I insist that most human behavior is learned, I cannot deny that hormones and brain chemistry have major …
/r/MensRights08/10/22 03:45 AM
5

This shit wouldn't fly to first date status for me. I feel people out thoroughly before asking them out, and their position on feminism would undoubtedly come up before date one.
/r/MensRights26/09/22 09:25 PM
3

Here's the skinny in far fewer words: The American right prioritizes profits over people. The American left prioritizes profits over people. Europeans scoff at the American left for being so far right. Neither party is sympathetic to the MRM. But there are major proponents on the American left which actively demonize men as a gender. Make of that what you will. IMO, they're both corrupt shit shows that have lost their direction and purpose as public servants.
/r/MensRights24/09/22 09:52 PM
14

“Fuck your sexist, myopic worldview, you stupid mouth breathing troglodyte” Or “The adults are discussing real issues here, take your fantasy bullshit to the kiddie corner if you can’t keep up”
/r/MensRights23/09/22 10:53 PM
8

Quick, how do I embed that old simpsons clip of “That’s the joke”? The narrative hasn’t “gotten out of hand”, it has spectacularly succeeded in its original female supremacy goals: a pseudo male scapegoat to pin every problem on.
/r/MensRights23/09/22 10:35 PM
7

People are dumb. Case closed.
/r/MensRights23/09/22 10:32 PM
1

The problem is correctly identifying "the system that is oppressing people". Feminism needed a purpose after the legal protections of the 1960s were set, so it fabricated the original sin of the patriarchy. There was no deeper insight that dribbled out of the feminist philosopher's cup, simply that a somehow controlling section of the male populace was suppressing women because... they got off on it? Who the fuck knows or cares, it's 100% bullshit. The most intellectually lazy motivator for some…
/r/MensRights21/09/22 11:18 AM
4

In general, I think most met don't care because they don't understand their relation to the situation. As many in this post have pointed out, men have been collectively conditioned by societal norms to be protective of women automatically, without reciprocation. ​ We discuss men's position in the world so infrequently that most men don't understand they're being constantly shit upon, all the time. It's like most complicated issues. The average person has difficulties processing how different the…
/r/MensRights04/09/22 08:58 AM
1

I find it hard to believe that human beings are "hardwired" to do anything. If you look across the entire world for cultural and psychological differences, it's more reasonable to conclude that behavior is learned. No, I think that the majority of men are conditioned to be simps. It's a very important distinction, because conditioning can be overcome. It can simply prove to be extremely difficult in some cases.
/r/MensRights28/08/22 08:24 AM
2

> The whole point is to be self reliant The whole point of what, exactly? Americans are raised to be very self reliant. Some other countries are very family and/or community focused.
/r/MensRights13/08/22 04:35 PM
5

I have zero tolerance for nonsense. Let’s add coward to your list of personality flaws, since you can’t be bothered to respond to basic questions.
/r/MensRights31/07/22 07:58 PM
3

What a shit spewing liar you are. “I don’t mean to stir the pot”, then what the fuck is the point of this entirely new post referencing your panty twist of trans matters? This post takes away from men’s issues, you absolute twat. How the fuck does “leftist wokeism” differ from “right wing wokeism”? Do you even understand what you’re saying? Gender and sex are different. They used to be synonymous, but prevailing trends changed. The use of words change over time, and that’s okay. You shouldn’t be…
/r/MensRights31/07/22 07:45 PM
15

“Bitch” has been put on the double plus ungood word list, don’t you know. We call them Karen now. Fuck, this is the stupidest timeline.
/r/MensRights24/07/22 08:20 PM
5

If your measure of a man is his ability to please women, aren't you really saying that only women's opinion on men matter? That reads like some feminist female supremacy bullshit, if you ask me.
/r/MensRights12/07/22 03:04 AM
24

That's not misogyny, that's female supremacy. When women lift themselves above men, purely because they are women, it's no different than white claiming genetic superiority because they're white. It's bigotry, thinly masked by a positive spin.
/r/MensRights14/06/22 12:12 AM
1

I'm not the biggest fan of legislating morals. I would prefer it if, as part of the process and paperwork of getting an abortion, the alleged father would need to also sign the form. If it's later discovered that the mother lied about the abortion status (ie, saying it was rape to avoid involving the father in the abortion consent process), then the father should have legal right to file a civil suit against the mother for misrepresentation. No one is going to be cross checking if women fill out…
/r/MensRights20/05/22 04:19 PM
2

I think you’re misread me. I’m not asking for a woman to be “front and center”, I’m wondering why there doesn’t seem to be a mother anywhere. And yes, I would be asking the same thing if the genders and holidays were flipped. Where is dad in the Mother’s Day children’s books? Maybe it’s unhealthy to focus too much on one parent, or maybe we shouldn’t elevate one parent above the other so much as a holiday. Kind of flies in the face of equality and all that.
/r/MensRights19/05/22 12:43 AM
3

Yeah, the polls were done here on Reddit. All of them pretty informal and open to any respondents. There is a specifically left-centric subreddit for MRAs, but I forget what it is at the moment. Not menslib, that’s a feminist gaslighting chamber. Abortion is merely one of many issues, and it’s complexity is compounded by science and religion. Science tells us many things, but it has no conclusive answer as to when a fetus becomes a “baby”. Religion only muddies the water further with different s…
/r/MensRights19/05/22 12:32 AM
12

The system is designed to make you too tired to resist. The system is winning.
/r/MensRights18/05/22 09:22 PM
5

Some of our more vocal posters are very right leaning, but overall this sub leans somewhat left according to polls done in the past. I myself am a extremely left leaning person and find the posters here are more often than not my agreeable peers when it comes to the subject of men’s rights. You’ll have to be specific if you want to know how much overlap there is between feminist points and MRA points. I’ve questioned feminists many times on what rights women don’t have today and what key issues …
/r/MensRights18/05/22 08:11 PM
38

While I certainly applaud positive change like this, I do wonder what happened to mom? Do children’s books feature functional men and women relationships anymore? I’m not familiar since I’m not a parent, but it seems like in the little recent children’s media I’ve been exposed to either has LGBT parents, single parents, or parents too busy to participate in the kid’s adventures. I wonder if we’ve leaned into catering to the minorities so much that we’re no longer teaching what average is and tha…
/r/MensRights18/05/22 07:26 PM
1

Okay, let’s bring back Bitch then.
/r/AntiFeminists04/05/22 08:52 PM
8

The feminists and their mindless drones are already shouting from the rooftops about how men have all the reproductive rights and the SCOTUS is only punishing women because they're fascists(?). I don't think there's any positive traction MRAs can make on this issue as long as male sexuality is diminished and demonized. We're not seen as equal parents, whether it's in the creation or the continued raising of children, and we're not given basic protections like genital integrity and we have no say…
/r/MensRights04/05/22 05:50 PM
5

I have words. "Ignorant, unfounded hate speech and lies." ​ That's what this is.
/r/MensRights04/05/22 07:55 AM
0

"Is X pro-woman?" Remember kids, Feminism is about female supremacy, not equality.
/r/MensRights13/04/22 06:40 PM
10

Confirmation bias and the irrational machismo belief of showing no weakness. They’re living in denial of many essential truths, likely the glue that holds their entire fragile world view together. First and foremost, their parents mutilated them by choice for cosmetic traditions. Second, our culture of laws that is supposed to protect the most at risk from harm has very explicit gaps in coverage. And third, they’re missing out on something they will never really have a chance to experience again…
/r/MensRights13/04/22 07:19 AM
7

Yet another instance of perceived harassment exclusively to women that also happens quite commonly to men as well. Delusional myopic morons.
/r/MensRights01/04/22 04:11 PM
18

Fucking bullshit. Look at the wealth of poetry, music, books and film that men have made pouring their souls out in public about how much they loved their women. Then look at the paltry amount that women have produced by comparison. Men lay down their very lives to cherish their loved ones. And women initiate the majority of divorces. This social media horseshit is just another shallow bitch waxing poetic about how she’s never been in a real relationship by blaming men.
/r/MensRights28/03/22 08:28 PM
4

I’m not an expert and it may vary state to state, but my understanding is that that money continues to go to the ex.
/r/MensRights28/03/22 07:52 PM
30

The government can barely track how people use food stamps, and those have a pile of rules on them for how they’re allowed to be spent. Having an audit system to confirm that child support is spent on the child? pffft. You’d have single mother trash coming out of the woodwork complaining about government overreach and invasion of privacy, not to mention all the conservatives barking about spending on social programs. I was in the same boat. Thousands went to my irresponsible mother, at no point …
/r/MensRights28/03/22 01:51 PM
153

In all likelihood, that money went to your mother as he paid it. It’s not sitting in a magical deposit box waiting for you to claim it. Welcome to the system. It’s not child support, it’s divorced mother support.
/r/MensRights28/03/22 01:41 PM
2

I definitely think we need our own lobbyists to spread influence to our elected government representatives, as ultimately that’s likely the only way we’ll see serious social and legal reforms. As for awareness, I’d say it’s time to develop an advertising branch of the movement. We need artists to post men’s rights related logos and slogans to social media, and we need to turn to television to run PSAs about what rights men need to fight for. We can attack our attackers later on, the primary wave…
/r/MensRights27/03/22 06:18 PM
20

Unlike feminists, I don’t believe that everything is a conspiracy of hatred. Internalized misogyny is rarely valid, and likewise this so-called instance of internalized misandry is also flawed. I don’t believe that women are placed ahead of men in emergencies due to a hatred of men, but rather because men often pursue what they consider to be “noble” as part of being a man. This feeds heavily into why men sacrifice themselves for women, seemingly by default. It’s not self hatred, so much as it’s…
/r/MensRights22/03/22 05:17 AM
18

Imo, the BIGGEST issue facing men in America today is also the biggest issue facing women. Wage stagnation, corporate monopolies, and “crony” capitalism have all conspired to virtually eliminate the single income home, and placed home ownership out of reach for many. This means working more, engaging with our families less, and overall contributes to the extremely unhealthy mentality that a person’s worth is their job title. All too often we forget that gender warfare is just a distraction from …
/r/MensRights18/03/22 09:07 PM
45

Feminism has transitioned from female advocacy to female supremacy, moving the goal posts from “women first” to “women only”. To concede that women are violent and that men need help, is to give away a portion of that hard lobbied for money that goes towards women’s organizations. Modern feminism operates on the same juvenile logic as Thanos. Instead of using his power to make more resources for all, he’d rather eliminate half the people in the universe. Same shit from feminists. They climb aboa…
/r/MensRights11/03/22 09:41 PM
2

Nah. There’s like a thousand clockwork variants out there, I just happened to get this screen name first.
/r/MensRights01/03/22 09:01 PM
3

There is at least one shameful aspect of women in general and their perspective in politics: Most women seem to believe that being a woman is in itself, a virtue. To the extreme that many women will vote for another woman because she’s a woman. Just look at Hillary Clinton’s major supporters and laughable campaign.
/r/MensRights01/03/22 07:15 PM
14

“Inadvertently”? Fuck off!
/r/MensRights29/01/22 05:47 AM
71

Dear women, You fucking first.
/r/MensRights24/01/22 03:40 PM
2

Value is highly subjective, and anyone pushing “high value” or “low value” as something that’s self evident or easily measured is probably trying to get you into some cult bullshit.
/r/MensRights04/12/21 10:00 PM
5

Had we built something together, that would certainly be beneficial, and maybe he could’ve been on my life insurance since he wasn’t employed/insured at the time; but ultimately our mutually beneficial living arrangement dissolved before the benefits of a civil union would have made much sense.
/r/MensRights22/11/21 08:52 AM
8

Unfortunately, since our relationship soured before he returned home, I wasn’t in contact with him before it happened nor his family afterwards. I’d like to think that if he wanted to off himself, he’d go out in a blaze of glory as fitting of his bombastic personality; but I don’t know if anything was in his system during the crash or what. I think, particularly when those who die are relatively young, many of us search ourselves for ways we could have intervened and “saved” them. I assume it’s …
/r/MensRights21/11/21 11:56 PM
15

Nah. I’m single with a single feeler out on a dating website seeing if anything nibbles. And he passed away in a motorcycle accident not long after returning home. I have no evidence, but the guy had a long history of depression, and sometimes I wonder if taking that turn too hard was really an accident. Whole thing is a major bummer.
/r/MensRights21/11/21 11:24 PM
8

Maybe? I mean, we got along splendidly and I had met his family. We were both very clearly into women, but our relationships never lasted very long for one reason or another. Progressive as some of the world is, I think it would have made dating women even more difficult if we had to explain a civil union between bros. We each still had ambitions of finding a wife and possibly starting a family. There would have been no real benefit to “formalize” our union at the time, and it would be an extra …
/r/MensRights21/11/21 11:05 PM
21

About a decade ago now, I had a “bromance” sort of relationship. We were roommates that kept moving together. We often ate out together, taking turns for paying, we pooled the cost of groceries and most often ate meals together, we saw movies regularly both in cinemas and as a weekend together thing. Due to a number of reasons, our platonic relationship came to an end and he moved back home with his parents. It definitely worked out for a few years there. We shared four different apartment/house…
/r/MensRights21/11/21 10:49 PM
-3

Don’t post in a public forum if you don’t want your opinions exposed to criticism, dipshit.
/r/MensRights21/11/21 12:48 PM
112

Just another narcissist, likely with daddy issues, who can’t understand how great people support each other, regardless of gender. Same sexist idiot would probably applaud a biopic on Steve Job’s mother.
/r/MensRights21/11/21 12:28 PM
-5

Are you fucking high? “Marxists” want a classless society with publicly owned infrastructure. If you knew anything beyond what Fox News considers “Marxism”, you’d at least know that. The nuclear family was never sustainable with stagnant wages, and it’s demonstrated across red states that republicans are slowest to raise the minimum wage. Let’s not pretend that republicans concern for the sustainable family unit is anything but meaningless lip service. I agree that democrats have overcommitted t…
/r/MensRights21/11/21 12:20 PM
141

And not having protections from religious genital mutilation (in various countries) And not being able to charge women with rape (in various countries) And being held to harsher standards of punishment for crimes (canning in particular, various countries) Sure, when you look past all the ways men are specifically targeted or excluded from protection, it’s easy to conclude they’re not systemically oppressed. You just have to be selectively blind or categorically ignorant and then it’s easy.
/r/MensRights20/11/21 11:12 PM
21

“Whataboutism” is a shitty term that’s regularly misused. Particularly in regards to feminism which claims to be about equality for both genders. So the question “what about men?” is not a “whatsboutism”, it’s a stark reminder that feminism is NOT what it claims to be. If you’re ever accused of “whatsboutism” for bringing up male social issues to a feminist, then turn the other cheek and remind them that feminism does not include men in the pursuit of equality. Feminism is female supremacy, alwa…
/r/MensRights19/11/21 02:33 AM
1

I agree. It’s a real no-brainer too. Worried about assault in the bathroom? Make it single occupancy and camera the outside of the door. Works as a shoplifting and drug use deterrent at the same time.
/r/MensRights14/11/21 03:40 AM
4

I’m trans, so don’t accuse me of any transphobic bullshit. If your genitals require sanitary products, that’s the restroom you should be using. Either make all restrooms unisex, or abide by the basic rules of using the toilet that matches your genitals. Trans people are a vanishingly small minority, smaller than homosexuals or people with disabilities who would need a parking placard. If you’re redesigning your building to accommodate less than 5% of the population, it’s quaint, but you’re basic…
/r/MensRights13/11/21 06:17 PM
1

The root of the problem is criminal psychology. I am NOT a criminal psychologist, but I’ve watched enough shit go down both in real life and in the dramatized world of crime television and movies to know some very basic concepts. Root 1: Abuse is cyclical. Studies have shown that children raised in abusive households, whether that violence was done directly to them, or was witnessed of parents engaging in hostilities with each other, are more likely to engage in domestic violence in the future. …
/r/MensRights10/11/21 10:00 AM
7

I always love it when people with no qualifications start lecturing the masses on criminal psychology. How slack jaw retarded do you have to be to honestly believe that sexual assault can even be approached with “awareness” posters? It’s not as if criminals haven’t been told that committing crime is wrong. Until you’re willing to address the root of the problem, you can’t try to offload the problem solely onto the perpetrators of the assault, you have to be an active participant in your own safe…
/r/MensRights05/11/21 08:20 AM
45

Another privileged woman making broad assumptions about how men act and feel. Into the trash it goes.
/r/MensRights05/11/21 12:26 AM
63

"Why don't American feminists talk about this more?" In case you haven't noticed, American Feminists are more concerned about painting women as an oppressed minority. Any victim narrative they can sink their teeth into is fair game. Their followers are stupid enough to believe it.
/r/MensRights05/09/21 05:38 AM
38

It's sad, but true. Women, not just feminists, have bought into the narrative that they're an oppressed minority. Can you bloody imagine? Roughly 50 percent of the population feels like they have the short end of the stick when they wield countless privileges above the other half. Overwhelmingly it's men, not women, who are conscripted to fight for their country. Overwhelmingly it's men, not women, who are left behind when evacuations begin for an emergency. Overwhelmingly it's men, not women, w…
/r/MensRights26/08/21 10:45 AM
32

You've been duped. Tricked. Bamboozled. Lied to. "Toxic Masculinity" is just another smear term against men that weak women use to attack men. There's no real effort to "fix" it, because it exists purely to be critical and destructive.
/r/MensRights23/08/21 06:37 AM
2

My thoughts: Women will lie about the father of their children, to another man's face, for years. IMO, that's far worse than rape. That's years of calculated criminal behavior, emotional abuse of their spouse and child abuse of the kid they also lie to. ​ If you honestly believe a woman wouldn't lie, because she's a woman, then you're kind of a sexist piece of shit.
/r/MensRights20/08/21 08:18 PM
7

Because feminists are willing to lie to achieve their ends. Always have been, always will be.
/r/MensRights17/08/21 01:55 PM
8

Lie, cheat, and steal while facing fewer consequences for my actions.
/r/MensRights05/08/21 12:15 AM
5

Well said, but I’m afraid you’re going up against a well cemented ignorance which parrots “Feminism is just Marxism in a skirt, class switched with gender”. It’s a stupid saying, and fundamentally wrong as you’ve clearly stated above, but it’s simple and trendy so it’s embedded in modern right wing punditry.
/r/MensRights30/07/21 11:20 PM
7

I’m going to throw a radical idea at you chief: It’s women. Just women. And the poor bastards who simp for them. The “feminist agenda” is all things that the average woman thinks she wants. “Equality”. Equal pay, equal opportunity, equal rights. It sounds good on paper, or splashed across a protest sign, but when the crazies start advocating male genocide the average woman claims that’s not real feminism and remains secure in their brand packaged social cause choice. They implicitly support the …
/r/MensRights27/07/21 12:02 AM
4

Yes, but I'm trans, so... Kind of my whole shtick there.
/r/MensRights22/07/21 07:11 PM
8

AskMen is a shitshow. It’s no surprise that they’re feminists.
/r/MensRights20/07/21 11:53 PM
-4

The core of capitalism is to exploit the process at every step of the process to maximize profits. Capitalism will always attempt to go for the cheapest supplier, thus ensuring the quality is substandard if not dangerous. Capitalism will always go for the cheapest middle-men, thus ensuring it will take an exaggerated amount of time to complete. And finally, Capitalism will always attempt to get the most money out of the consumer as possible. Driving down the cost of supplies and labor is exactly…
/r/MensRights06/07/21 07:22 AM
1

It’s intentional, just like all feminist misnomers.
/r/MensRights02/07/21 06:50 AM
39

More paranoid sexist bullshit from the neurotic minds of TwoX. Into the trash it goes.
/r/MensRights28/06/21 01:26 AM
6

So, let’s be real. There is a subset of men who have defined their lives around “questionable”, often shallow motives. Movie stereotypes abound: the car guy, the hopeless musician, the man whore, the venture capitalist. Single minded men who cannot function when their lifestyle is disrupted; they spiral out of control into addiction when life throws them a curveball. That’s the fragile male ego. And like most movie stereotypes, the actual number of people who act like that are few and far betwee…
/r/MensRights24/06/21 09:49 AM
43

Jesus Christ this is a bad idea. I mean, props to you trying to be the good kid and all, but if anyone finds out anyone but her is doing her assignments, that’s instant fail and possible expulsion depending on the college’s rules.
/r/MensRights24/06/21 09:21 AM
1

Why is this here? One bad take after another and it has nothing to do with men’s rights. There’s a handful of behaviors held over from evolution that all humans have. Genetics and hormones can be strong influencers on mood and behavior, but the mind is ultimately a blank slate. Psychology is ultimately more important than biology, and that’s kind of how body disphoria works. This is just dumb. I mean, the fight club take is particularly dumb, but this bullet point on its own is bordering on a pa…
/r/MensRights24/06/21 08:55 AM
1

First time I’ve heard this take. It’s a bad one.
/r/MensRights24/06/21 08:29 AM
3

It's simple really. Women are innately more selfish than men. They want to have all the benefits of being masculine while also being feminine, but because they are selfish they also gatekeep what's determined to be feminine. "Women and children first", as they say. It's not enough that feminists "fight for equality", it's part of the doctrine that they pull up the ladder behind them. TERFs are a perfect example of this. It's the same reason why women fight against male shelters and programs. The…
/r/MensRights23/06/21 01:18 PM
3

Ahoy. Trans person here. I’m not an expert, but I’m as close as you might get around this subreddit. So, biological gender exists on a spectrum of chromosome expressions. There are many many combinations of genetic markers which would give a person more male or female traits, but ultimately your cells are one or the other and this combined with hormones during your development influence your body size and shape. Now, gender differences exist in the brain between biological males and biological f…
/r/MensRights14/06/21 10:53 AM
16

Welcome to reality. Male sexuality is demonized. Having desires makes you a pervert. Having preferences infringes on women's rights to enjoy any male they want. Toys for women are empowering, toys for men are pathetic and ridiculed. Porn for men is dirty and exploitative, porn for women is mature and expressive. Feminism is a symptom of a larger societal issue with women in general. Not all women, but more than enough to be genuinely concerned.
/r/MensRights14/06/21 12:15 AM
63

Oh look, more normalizing of female hysteria and casual misandry. Advice to anyone: If interacting with others in public is traumatic for you, see a fucking doctor. That’s not normal, and I’m not changing my routine of minding my own business to make you feel “safe”.
/r/MensRights28/03/21 07:40 PM
-1

It’s part of a toxic gender role that says men are to remain strong and stoic in all situations. Some men, for lack of a better identity, latch on to toxic gender roles because of familial and/or cultural norms. “Men shouldn’t cry” are poison words fed to impressionable boys from both men and women in their lives, depending on the culture. This leads indoctrinated men to believe that real men shouldn’t allow themselves to be victims. It boils down to antiquated and toxic views on masculinity and…
/r/MensRights24/03/21 01:23 AM
12

People are taught how the world works when they’re young. Unless they have a personal experience that changes their view point, most people will remain in the status quo of misinformation. Compound this with the rise of anti-intellectualism in the west, and what you get is a society dizzied by the amount of information available to them by modern technology. Instead of adapting to critical thinking, most find it easier to stick to their guns. There’s no easy solution, but the past reveals that p…
/r/MensRights24/03/21 01:10 AM
3

So, let me start by offering two nuggets of advice: One, don’t approach mental illness as something that is curable. It’s basically brain cancer, and you won’t be well until the very last bit of it is scraped out of your system, lest it return and often worse than it had been before. Having said that, most mental illness is treatable in that you can hope to live a relatively normal life even without being 100% cured. Two, the role of your psychologist should be two fold. First, someone you can t…
/r/MensRights23/03/21 09:10 PM
5

More delusional, historical revisionist bullshit from the camp that can't decide if they've always been the "true" slaves of society or if they're ruling the world. ​ Feminism stands for Female Supremacy. Don't forget it.
/r/MensRights19/03/21 05:45 PM
6

Hot take: there’s a term for childish men because it’s abnormal. Meanwhile, childish women are the norm.
/r/MensRights15/03/21 07:43 AM
5

It’s super simple. Quota hires got an easy ride to where they are. As long as there are quota hires, someone has to fill those seats. I know it wasn’t me, so my competency compass is going to sniff out the least qualified person and consider them the quota hire. Guess who fits the bill, Karen.
/r/MensRights08/03/21 09:38 PM
49

Do we get to also stop hearing about the mythical 'unpaid labor' of the ordinary housewife as well then?
/r/MensRights28/01/21 09:55 PM
79

What a crock of shit. Are we honestly expected to address such a piddling “inequality”? Men speak up more in class than women? What is the goal here? Exact fifty percent participation? How is that even enforced? The very concept is so bitterly stupid I can barely grasp it. The lack of accountability is staggering. If women want to be heard more, they need to step forward and participate. That’s really all there is to it.
/r/MensRights21/01/21 08:16 AM
2

This is not the place to air your drama laundry.
/r/MensRights01/01/21 02:49 AM
4

“I know it sounds very sexist” pump the brakes, buddy. If it’s sexist to question whether or not men are oppressed in some fashion, who do you think is in charge? Both men and women are absolutely oppressed, by government, by societal traditions, and as workers obeying their corporate masters. When you get down to the worst of it, men die more from misery(suicide) and die younger than women in general. We’re expected to take abuses that women are mercifully excluded from (conscription, circumcis…
/r/MensRights28/12/20 05:09 AM
2

Wew lad. That’s a really old article from a very controversial site. Sad that it had to be said at all, really. But what’s worse is the resounding lack of support from other women. Yes, there are female MRAs, but most of y’all are extremely quiet, particularly when it comes to everyday instances of sexism against men. I’ll be honest, I don’t think we would have gotten to the intersectional clusterfuck of what is supposedly fourth wave feminism if there were simply enough women out their who genu…
/r/MensRights28/12/20 02:59 AM
20

Why would you swear an oath not to hurt someone who would never swear the same oath in return? I’m not at all convinced that women are less violent than men, only that they use different methods to exact their revenge and exert their control onto others. To be frank, the majority of women I’ve encountered in life have a positively juvenile understanding of interpersonal conflict resolution; resorting to physical and emotional attacks at the slightest provocation. In the West, in my experience an…
/r/MensRights17/12/20 01:22 AM
2

Didn’t fucking work for global warming. Sometimes you have to bend to the audience and rebrand to language that can all be agreed upon. “Climate Change” is the new term, doesn’t confuse the dummies. Likewise, “toxic gender roles” is a superior term to “toxic masculinity” because it’s more descriptive, can be applied to evenly to multiple genders, and doesn’t offend anyone. Take a hint.
/r/MensRights14/11/20 03:36 AM
1

What you described are toxic gender roles. “Toxic masculinity” is a feminist doublespeak slur, used to shame “traditional” male traits while excluding women from any culpability or similarities. Funny how there is no “toxic femininity”, when women perpetuate harmful stereotypes about men it’s somehow still toxic masculinity. There’s also no “positive masculinity” to counterbalance the proposition either. Gender theory academics may claim to have a hold on the term, yet it’s very clearly used by …
/r/MensRights14/11/20 03:28 AM
2

No, because it has nothing to do with masculinity and it’s also a stereotype perpetuated by women into men. “Toxic masculinity” is a nonsense term that few people agree upon, so why suffer to use it and try to explain its context every time?
/r/MensRights14/11/20 03:04 AM
2

It’s not toxic masculinity, because we all know that’s not a thing. It’s not male disposability either. Public figures are often praised and vilified by their actions, plenty of people will mourn for Rush, plenty of people won’t. Regardless of how you feel about him, he was clearly a divisive figure. But more to the point of the post, that his fellow talk show host urged him to “leave the stage with dignity”, that is a toxic gender role. It stems from the belief that men should be strong, and th…
/r/MensRights13/11/20 10:28 PM
1

I'm of the opinion that movement leaders should be as diplomatic as possible to enact real change in the world of "normies". Figureheads like Paul Elam who shitpost about false accusers being "lying bitches" doesn't really help our cause, and sours the public on our message. While I acknowledge that there is some women hate in this forum, I think that our community does an above average job of calling it out and downvoting it where it happens. Rule 10 in the sidebar makes outright hate speech ag…
/r/MensRights16/10/20 10:20 PM
1

I disagree. There’s an awful lot you can do to remedy stupid, the trouble of it is that it typically takes more time and resources than it’s worth.
/r/MensRights11/10/20 01:58 AM
5

I’m an anti feminist third; I’m an egalitarian first and MRA second. The virus response and our border control problem (ICE camps, etc) are an unmitigated disaster which are directly resulting in death and suffering. Climate change is a global issue which a republican controlled US simply isn’t willing to participate in. By those measures, I will choose a democratic candidate over a republican candidate. If they happen to be a feminist, so be it. The misinformation that feminism spreads is a can…
/r/MensRights01/10/20 02:08 AM
7

I agree that Biden is not the MRA candidate, however, the laundry list of Trump’s failings and embarrassments regarding general human rights, the virus response, and climate change... I cannot in good conscience ever vote for a person as selfish, sightless, and corrupt as that. They do not in any way represent me or my interests, even if he’s done a thing or two I agree with. Trump is a dangerous embarrassment for democracy and the United States suffers for his crimes and inaction every day he’s…
/r/MensRights01/10/20 12:31 AM
14

Not trying to dox ya, but this is a somewhat global forum. Would you mind sharing what country and school segment (ie, high school, university, other) this applies to? Just thinking that, this is more significant if it’s happened in the UK or India given their gynocentric programs; but it’s still welcome news if it’s happening in the states. True equality is being mindful that anyone can be the victim or aggressor when it comes to sexual harassment or crimes in general; so this is good news inde…
/r/MensRights01/10/20 12:04 AM
21

It’s the double standard which gets me. Even if the women are enjoying the attention, if it’s men touching and staring at them, it will be seen as perverse, creepy, inappropriate, threatening, and/or simply wrong. Male sexuality is demonized, largely by feminist “thinkers”. They have conditioned women and weak men to believe that male sexuality is inherently violent and barely controlled, that it is something to be shamed and contained. It’s sickeningly bigoted thinking, and it needs to be calle…
/r/MensRights30/09/20 07:09 AM
3

Men are commonly, for lack of a better word, indoctrinated as boys to be responsible for girl’s comfort and safety. Feminism has attempted to tear down the fabric of a healthy society without understanding why it was there in the first place. Men and women need each other to fulfill certain roles and needs that is difficult to handle alone. Once they solidified the “strong, independent woman” trope, they were set up for failure. Besides the utter detachment from reality and latent sexism at the …
/r/MensRights29/09/20 05:34 AM
3

This ought to be higher. Other people’s paranoia are not your problem. They need to address their unhealthy thought patterns with a professional.
/r/MensRights29/09/20 05:22 AM
2

If you were under the impression that modern feminists were ever grounded in reality, you weren’t paying attention.
/r/MensRights18/09/20 08:42 PM
-2

“Marxist”? Come now, we’re supposed to be better than conspiracy theories.
/r/MensRights20/06/20 07:45 PM
5

Some of them, absolutely. I would say the rise of white nationalist groups is largely due in part because white communities aren’t allowed to celebrate white achievements without it being ‘racist’. I’m not saying we need to keep statues of known slavers and historical racists, but when you tear down the only sense of identity a community has without putting something positive in its place, you leave a power vacuum that nefarious parties are happy to fill.
/r/MensRights19/06/20 03:59 AM
21

I’m not black, so I have no real perspective on this. But as an outsider, it really seems like “the black community” has a number of systemic issues which plague it and yet few to no “black leaders” which stand up to address them. What causes fatherlessness in black communities? Is it cowardice of the men not ready to be fathers? Is it arrogance of the women who insist “I don’t need no man”? Does our welfare system incentivize single motherhood? Is black involvement in crime so prevalent that ma…
/r/MensRights18/06/20 03:42 PM
3

I’m confused. Didn’t James damore claim women were more neurotic according to a study, and this somehow made him a horrible misogynistic tech bro? But here’s some pinkpill nobody saying we need to recognize that women have more mental illnesses? If women are biologically predisposed to having mental illnesses, shouldn’t we automatically trust them a bit less with important fields and child raising? Feels like the typical feminist whinge. “We need more support and resources than men do!” vs “we’r…
/r/MensRights16/06/20 08:36 PM
5

Because males are disposable, according to society.
/r/MensRights03/06/20 08:17 PM
14

I mean, yes, but also, DUH. Just asking any men’s rights forum should’ve gotten a clear response about how we find the term sexist and the flimsy reasoning behind it to be biased and unnecessarily gendered. Feminism is steered by the most charismatic sociopaths of the bunch. They never consulted men before deciding how to label them and fix their problems from a female perspective.
/r/MensRights02/06/20 08:09 AM
1

Stay in school kids.
/r/MensRights01/06/20 03:03 AM
6

Well, if you want answers you should probably start with some questions. Also, try not to resent the chilly response too much. Self proclaimed feminists are responsible for quite a lot of what is considered male oppression, so some users of this subreddit are predisposed to disliking “your kind”. As a general ramble, I’d start off by saying the vast majority of MRAs do not hate women. Hating feminists is not the same as hating women. Much like our current police situation in the US, we do unders…
/r/MensRights01/06/20 12:01 AM
1

You don’t know what communism is, so you don’t get to use that word. Feminism is female supremacy. Communism was startlingly egalitarian for its time. Read a book for fucks sake.
/r/MensRights31/05/20 11:08 PM
2

Nothing in my post implies any affiliation with ACAB, and I resent the accusation. I’m egalitarian, so I don’t give a rats ass about ethnically homogenous versus melting pot. People are people and abide by common psychological traits, often regardless of culture. I can, will, and did make that comparison, so deal with it. State’s rights are theoretically important, but having a functional peace officer system is arguably more important.
/r/MensRights30/05/20 05:57 AM
2

Hey, good news for a change!
/r/MensRights30/05/20 04:36 AM
13

It’s a complicated issue, not to sound dismissive or anything. The United States is a weird beast. We have a national military, but police are divvied into districts which fall under state and local guidelines. Not unlike our shitty fractured school and health system, this means that there’s very few standards for training and discipline. Police, fire, and EMT should all have standard and comprehensive training. A clear delineation between military and police hardware should be implemented. A we…
/r/MensRights30/05/20 04:32 AM
4

Virtue signaling, or female supremacy? Hard to say, honestly.
/r/MensRights29/05/20 05:55 PM
12

Made up man hating statistics, nothing new for trollx
/r/MensRights29/05/20 04:08 PM
3

Jesus fucking Christ. Even if the wage gap were true, which we know it’s not, the argument in this brain dead tweet is that earning less is “the brunt” of the viruses effects versus... DEATH?! Maybe I’m just not capitalist enough to see it, but I think I’d take a pay cut versus dying horribly as your lungs fill with fluid and your body shuts down. Y’know. Because humans are more than their paycheck. FFS.
/r/MensRights28/05/20 03:04 AM
0

Frivolously expanding the definition of rape to include “regret sex” like this stupid post, seriously undermines the legitimacy of actual rape claims and spits in the face of actual rape victims. I’m not convinced that “feminists” actually care about rape, unless of course they can benefit from it.
/r/MensRights27/05/20 04:13 AM
36

Worse. This is a popular feminist that other feminists look up to.
/r/MensRights23/05/20 11:53 PM
10

The West has an incredible problem trying to hold women accountable for their own actions. This is not evidence of a patriarchy, but instead implies the opposite, women are a protected (ruling) class.
/r/MensRights17/05/20 06:47 AM
1

I said it before and I’ll say it again here, Karen has become the new Bitch. Feminists and other couch fainters thought that Bitch was “sexist” or somehow “misogynistic”, so politically correct people no longer say Bitch. Why Karen? Because Karen is a Bitch. But since we’re not supposed to say that word anymore, we just say “Okay Karen”. Bitch was never that bad, I’d remind anyone with google handy that numerous “bad girls” have tried to retake and celebrate Bitch numerous times in the past. Onl…
/r/MensRights15/05/20 12:36 AM
3

They’ve been indoctrinated to believe that men literally think about sex nonstop and that we could go mad and rape the nearest available person at a moment’s notice. Not All Feminists, of course. But there’s very clearly a subsection that have demonized males to the point of hysterical fright regarding them.
/r/MensRights13/05/20 07:48 AM
1

The tragedy of stupidity is that it only takes a very little malice from a few select people in order to steer a mob of imbeciles.
/r/MensRights13/05/20 03:00 AM
2

You know... I’m not a scientist, but reflecting on my life of over 30 odd years... The most vindictive, the most emotionally abusive, the most dysfunctional, the most delusional, and the worst liars were all... well, guess. Anecdotal evidence is nothing to hang your hat on. But everyone knows stereotypes come from a place of truth. And “hell hath no fury like a woman scorned” is some old, bitter truth. Everyone knows it.
/r/MensRights13/05/20 02:53 AM
6

Let’s be clear, it’s not just childbirth, it’s the ancient connotations of fertility and mythological understandings of the origin of life. If you’re a logical person, you reject religion for lack of credible evidence. Now take a look at the modern world, and you can see quite quickly that most of humanity is not logical by practice. Many men and women believe their lot in life is to reproduce. In reality, a person can find meaning in any number of life pursuits. Raising children is not a specia…
/r/MensRights12/05/20 01:57 AM
2

When you have a culture which praises single parents, you’re going to see that both Mother’s Day and Father’s Day draw cries from children of single parents that their parent should also get recognition. Frankly, I think we should just have an Elder’s day and Children’s day. Celebrate the older members of your family on one day, celebrate the younger members of your family on the other. Simple, non-gendered. Feminists will never concede to getting rid of Mother’s Day though. I mean, for fuck sam…
/r/MensRights10/05/20 08:33 PM
2

The problem with “toxic masculinity” is that it defines negative traits that ANY person could have. That’s why men aren’t happy about the term, because it unfairly categorizes asshole behavior with “masculinity”. The most rational thing would be to disavow the term all together and recognize that toxic traits are most often due to complex psychological origins and not innately attached to either typical gender norms. But since rationality is in short supply, the more reasonable solution may be t…
/r/MensRights10/05/20 08:11 PM
1

Too much jargon. It’s okay to just call them idiots.
/r/MensRights10/05/20 02:22 AM
7

The sad truth of history is that no female ruler has ever ended war, hunger, or poverty. Women are not magically better than men. The vagina does not imbue heightened levels of compassion or reason. Ignorant rags like this serve only to divide people. We must act together to solve the world’s worst issues, or all we will have is another class of people working towards something and an opposing class trying to resist. To be effective, you must get the vast majority on board or your ideas for chan…
/r/MensRights08/05/20 10:29 PM
2

Women have been a willing part of the shitty social contract for just as long as men have. No amount of female heads of state magically ended war, crime, poverty, disease or any form of bigotry. Millionaire women are just as selfish as millionaire men. Women are on the front lines of these selfish “anti-quarantine” protests. Does this person you’re arguing against think that women have no agency? Feminism, as a movement, demonstrates that politically motivated women will fight for themselves, an…
/r/MensRights01/05/20 06:50 AM
3

He dead.
/r/MensRights01/05/20 06:33 AM
36

Female supremacy’s slipping mask. Women are “entitled” to various spaces. What are men entitled to? What about trans persons? It was never about equality.
/r/MensRights27/04/20 11:21 AM
-1

Jesus fuck, I have better things to do than to straighten out your linguistic bullshit. It's very simple. Do try to keep up. Communism: The goal of which is to have a stateless, classless society. Despite your claims that it's a 'race to the bottom', many communist countries saw an improvement in the quality of life compared to pre-communist reforms, particularly when it came to education and healthcare. Argue 'til you're blue in the face, Russia went from a collapsing oligarchy to a major polit…
/r/MensRights27/04/20 04:37 AM
-1

So... Female supremacy, high in-group favor, and nepotism somehow equal communism? Nope. Invalid premise. Gross oversimplification that appeals to reactionary right wingers that associate everything bad to be communism.
/r/MensRights27/04/20 03:58 AM
-1

Fine story, still an embarrassingly false equivalency. For a "history buff", you strike me as someone who probably calls China communist because the husk clutching China's pearls still bears the CCP mark.
/r/MensRights27/04/20 03:56 AM
-2

They’re really not. Feminism is female supremacy, it’s even in the name. Communism is about state owned industries. Equating feminism to communism is to display a staggering misunderstanding of at least one of those things, if not both.
/r/MensRights27/04/20 02:26 AM
-1

Justify your statement.
/r/MensRights27/04/20 12:58 AM
2

Does misandry come from the left, or does the left simply associate itself with misandrists? Very important question. Let’s try another. Does child rape come from the Catholic Church, or does the catholic church simply associate itself with child rapists? Food for thought indeed. Try to remember that actual liberalism is and what passes for it in the US and UK are Wildly Different. Egalitarian polices are liberal. Female supremacist policies are feminist. Feminism infected the left, not the othe…
/r/MensRights26/04/20 04:37 AM
1

My “narrative” is pretty consistent, it just flies in the face of your world view so you dismiss it, as conservatives tend to do. I’d be curious to see what promises the wind sack has actually kept, but I wasn’t “trying to go after the right “. On the contrary, I was trying to eke out an actual answer from you about what you believe constitutes “the left” when even the running democrats would be considered European right. You still never answered who was accusing whom of what. You can’t just poi…
/r/MensRights26/04/20 04:22 AM
2

You know, literally every picture I’ve seen of the “virus protests” in the US over the past week have prominently featured screaming women in them. These aren’t being put on by the left, mate. Let’s not pretend that people on the right aren’t just as deranged, they’re just under diagnosed. Conservatives are more likely to trust in god than medical science in the first place.
/r/MensRights26/04/20 03:17 AM
2

“Leftists”. Left of what, exactly? There hasn’t been any leadership from the right in fucking ages mate. The US political scene is a stagnant cesspool. When the political right in the US is so fundamentally backwards, broken, and behind the times that they’re chasing “clean coal”, you’ve got to be a shameless profiteer or a mouth breathing moron to support those goons. The US political spectrum is establishment democrats which are moderately right Europeans , and fucking cartoonishly evil fucks …
/r/MensRights26/04/20 03:14 AM
1

TERFs are the gold standard for entitled princess syndrome. They earnestly believe that being a woman has some special, intrinsic value and that allowing men to become women somehow makes them less special. It’s peak Karen. They believe they are, in effect, the chosen people and they should control who is allowed to be one of them. It’s repugnant bigotry. And unfortunately it’s often given a pussypass because women are exposing their hatred.
/r/MensRights22/04/20 07:34 AM
3

Oh look, paranoid bullshit. No one dismisses rape as “boys will be boys”. But there is a very valid question of”why after all this time?” If you are the victim of a crime, it is not only in your best interest, but it’s your fucking civic goddamn duty to report it so the police are aware of activity in the area and step up measures to protect others. Nothing should stop you, least of all the goddamn imaginary protests of people you shouldn’t give a fuck about. I mean, if someone is defending your…
/r/MensRights11/04/20 12:47 AM
0

What the fuck are you talking about? What the shit is “Marxist feminism”? Do you even know what Marxism is?
/r/MensRights08/03/20 10:09 AM
0

Dude, you seriously know nothing about Marxism/Socialism if you’re attaching it to the “unpaid labor” rhetoric from feminist “thinkers”. Your question doesn’t deserve a response because it’s built upon a false premise. Try again.
/r/MensRights04/03/20 05:47 PM
-5

Oi. Let’s not become feminists by distorting words, please? You can’t just slap a prefix on Marxism and make sense. It shows a deep misunderstanding of what Marxism was.
/r/MensRights02/02/20 09:36 PM
2

The true face of male disposability.
/r/MensRights02/02/20 01:45 AM
3

Deranged newspeak. Just shake your head and be glad you aren’t them.
/r/MensRights31/01/20 02:33 AM
4

I mean, I’m bad at math, but even I know you can google that shit in under five minutes and learn how to make excel add four quarters up for you. This is advanced stupid.
/r/MensRights30/01/20 11:27 PM
1

At what point did you decide it made sense to drag Marxism into your comment? Or liberal? Do you have any idea how pointlessly divisive it is to shit on broad groups of men’s opinions and beliefs, in this of all places? What a nonsense comment. Fuck right off with your “men wouldn’t be able to utter a word of protest”. Not all men are cowards. And “gynocentrism is in our biology”? Please. The entire course of human civilization is the story of mankind triumphing over the limitations of biology. …
/r/MensRights29/01/20 02:28 AM
3

Report the nutter. “Exterminate these people” is hate speech.
/r/MensRights28/01/20 08:31 AM
10

I was a dem until the DNC went head first into a giant, unelectable vagina. Now I'm registered as independent. Bernie looks like the only viable choice at this point.
/r/MensRights17/01/20 08:47 PM
6

What sad, delirious ramblings. Both the article itself and the comments from that deplorable subreddit. Hundreds of idiots unironically believing in the patriarchy. It's like uncovering a scientology convention in your back yard. I'd pity them, if they weren't so self-righteous and utterly spiteful towards others.
/r/MensRights17/01/20 07:18 AM
3

Who is this internet nobody and why should we care?
/r/MensRights17/01/20 07:01 AM
1

Think we can get a less editorialized video of the supposed incident? I don’t need to waste 15 minutes on rage bait. Also, “leftist” and “right wing” are pointlessly divisive here. Less of that, please.
/r/MensRights16/01/20 05:33 AM
6

Bleh. More irritating cunts from twox, writing sexist shit that would get them fired if they were male. Western women are coddled like children, allowed to wear and act however they want with little to no repercussions. Meanwhile, the majority of male positions in the workplace require a uniform or strict dress code. Once again it boils down to “male sexuality = bad, female sexuality = empowerment”. Women have decreed they have to be free to express themselves at all times, whether that’s showin…
/r/MensRights14/01/20 09:19 PM
-1

"You're allowed to feel oppressed, but don't do it here" - some clown, 2020 I'm not a fan of cross posting memes or rage bait from social media nobodies, but I respond to content I don't like by downvoting it. We live in a world where people laugh off the MRM because they don't understand that men suffer (or they don't care, which makes them sociopaths, and fuck sociopaths, but I digress). The reality is that men do suffer, and this forum is plastered with the issues that men suffer from. It's r…
/r/MensRights14/01/20 07:45 AM
1

Further evidence that the US Court system is woefully outdated, inefficient, and ultimately ineffective.
/r/MensRights11/01/20 03:31 AM
1

Cool story bro. Wrong sub?
/r/MensRights07/01/20 12:37 AM
-1

Fuck off with this delusional decisive bullshit. Nothing you said was relevant to men’s rights.
/r/MensRights03/01/20 10:35 PM
22

"Women are disproportionately affected by everything, therefore everything is a feminist issue" - Feminists looking for handouts
/r/MensRights22/12/19 10:47 PM
1

Because our media is in bed with the companies and politicians they used to hold a light to. When presented with a chance to call out one of the hands that feeds them, they will smile and nod and expertly deflect onto the next question. Democracy has become diseased, as the mechanism to keep things honest was packaged and sold to the highest bidder. Journalism is dead, and it takes the informed electorate with it.
/r/MensRights17/12/19 12:19 AM
5

What you’ll find here is an environment dedicated to men’s rights. That’s any man, gay or straight, cis or trans. Women are certainly welcome, as is anyone who cares for the subject. Men’s rights as a movement is much more focused than feminism and doesn’t grope around other communities for “inclusiveness”. You may run into people that distinguish “that’s not a men’s issue”, and for that, it’s best to understand that this community will not replace any LGBT community in terms of support and acce…
/r/MensRights14/12/19 12:58 AM
2

The US has some of the best propaganda out there.
/r/MensRights03/12/19 07:13 AM
4

And what’re you going to do? Supervise?
/r/MensRights30/10/19 05:14 AM
149

Then surely every dick joke and pro-circumcising comment from women is proof of Misandry, right ladies? Women body shame other women and men far more than the reverse.
/r/MensRights20/10/19 02:40 PM
3

You would think that with how many handouts and glowing reviews female led businesses have, some enterprising woman would’ve made a line of garments with pockets and swept the world through social media marketing. But alas, the bitter truth of the world is that there doesn’t seem to be a sustainable market. More women prefer the versatility of a purse to clothes with pockets. As ever, feminists are confused about how reality works and have blamed men for their ineptitude.
/r/MensRights16/10/19 05:37 PM
5

I think you may be projecting your personal experience as a default male experience. There wasn’t much in the way of crime happening in my mobile home park. I wasn’t exposed to any criminal culture by my peers or adjacent adults. I believe studies often show a link to crime and poverty, and the latter is extremely variable from neighborhood to neighborhood. I think that’s why it’s not a common MRA talking point, as it doesn’t apply to as many men as you might think. All that said, I believe ther…
/r/MensRights12/10/19 04:22 PM
1

It’s how men rate women versus how women rate men. The top graph shows that most men judge most women on a bell curve where most women are average while some are less attractive and some are more attractive. The bottom graph shows that most women judge most men as decidedly less attractive, with no men qualifying as most attractive. Based on this limited set of data, one could conclude that women have significantly higher physical standards than men when choosing a partner. Is it a men’s rights …
/r/MensRights09/10/19 11:30 PM
10

Ah, equity. A word that almost looks like equality, but in practice is the polar opposite. It comes from the “progressive stack” line of thinking, which is the anti-vaxxers of sociology. Fucking anti-intellectual horseshit. These fools want to prop women up as a protected minority class. If you have the means, fight back. Write your representatives.
/r/MensRights08/10/19 09:29 PM
4

Women suffer most from the “women are wonderful” effect. They place value on the fact they are women, as though it is a form of merit. This DEEPLY ingrained sexism precludes them to favor female authority over male authority (dozens of studies back this up, I can’t be arsed because I’m on a phone). Authors, teachers, politicians... even editorialists are heavily favored by women when they are women. They prop up this nonsense excuse about “the female perspective”, again as though the fact it’s f…
/r/MensRights08/10/19 12:02 AM
2

What a truly loathsome bitch.
/r/MensRights06/10/19 03:12 AM
10

I’ll be upfront, I am not a parent, but allow me to pitch some armchair philosophy on the subject of child rearing. There comes a time in a child’s life when they take their first trip down the toy aisle. Parental purchase choices form the entirety of early infancy, while things like developed personal preferences on which action figure or video game holds the kid’s attention come later. Preference, shelf space, price, and the parents’ approval determine whether or not a toy gets taken home. I d…
/r/MensRights26/09/19 03:34 AM
5

Say it with me now: bad people come from bad parents. Just because you had a “little miracle” does not qualify you in any way to care for or raise a healthy child.
/r/MensRights25/09/19 08:28 PM
5

Inconvenient news angle, won’t be reported outside of the locals. Wasn’t the first time, won’t be the last.
/r/MensRights18/09/19 07:54 PM
13

Or, you know, catcalling is yet another overblown stint of feminist paranoia about how merely existing while female is the most difficult thing on earth. Turns out it happens less than you think.
/r/MensRights18/09/19 03:06 AM
2

I agree, “man up” is shitty. So is “be a man”. It’s sexist language designed to reprimand men for not being “manly” enough. It’s an admission by the speaker that they have a prejudice regarding how they think men should act, and you’re failing to meet their expectations. It’s always condescending. Men don’t have to be tough. Men don’t have to be strong. Men don’t have to bear the burden placed on them by others. And these sexist phrases push the expectation men should be these things. I am not y…
/r/MensRights18/09/19 02:40 AM
48

Female virgin: chaste, unblemished, desirable Male virgin: loser, “creepy”, undesirable Tell me again how “men” made something that explicitly disadvantages them? Oh wait, this is some Patriarchy feminist projection bullshit.
/r/MensRights17/09/19 07:52 PM
11

The self-fellating Hollywood press has been gynocentric since forever. It’s a tragedy when a female star is falling from grace, but male stars fucking explode when they go out and the media treats it like a circus or a disgrace. They put Charlie sheen’s disturbed ass in front of a dozen cameras and his mental breakdown became a fucking meme. The same media which rushes to concern when a girl pop idol starts abusing substances will gladly turn a blind eye or even enable dysfunctional behavior in …
/r/MensRights13/09/19 03:26 AM
11

Same reason why climate change takes so long to process. “Hey, this thing you’re doing kills us all” “But we’ve always done this thing. It makes money” “But it KILLS US ALL” “Money?”
/r/MensRights03/09/19 07:53 PM
2

And yet, I don’t see any male celebrities flagrantly belittling, humiliating and deliberately intimidating random members of the opposite sex. Why is it when women get “corrupted by power”, they seem to make it about their genitals?
/r/MensRights29/08/19 02:21 AM
1

Short answer: the so-called marxists of the modern age are nothing more than virtue signaling posers that wear Marx as a label symbolizing care for the working class while continuing capitalist exploitation. It’s no difference than wearing pink to “raise awareness” for breast cancer. It’s a meaningless gesture. Capitalist countries are notorious for stifling dissent and warping public opinion. American workers have no guaranteed health or vacation benefits, and they applaud their “freedom”. Marx…
/r/MensRights25/06/19 07:44 AM
-8

Reads a little too much like an alt right fairy tale to me. “Twas the postmodernism that did me in”
/r/MensRights24/06/19 10:38 AM
13

Because they’re sexist. Duh.
/r/MensRights02/06/19 10:15 PM
19

I’m fine with this advice. If a woman is so paranoid that she’s reading into compliments for hidden messages, let that crazy bitch run for the hills. You dodged a bullet.
/r/MensRights22/05/19 02:54 AM
8

Aka, most scholarships. Women couldn’t understand how I ran out of money for college.
/r/MensRights22/05/19 02:28 AM
5

It just speaks to how gynocenyric modern society is that the voices heard loudest about male discrimination are those who used to be women. MRAs have a valuable ally in the trans community as it may be the only way to reach those entrenched in female supremacy.
/r/MensRights17/05/19 08:11 PM
0

I don’t think MRAs should support abortion, as feminists have pushed the ideology that it’s “her body, her choice”. To be frank: reap what you sow, bitches. As long as women want to act as the sole gatekeepers of reproduction, why should we support any of it? Whether or not abortion as a whole is legal, isn’t an MRA issue any more than holes in the ozone layer. Until fathers are respected as a joint venture in conception, why should we bother? They want all the privilege, they saddle all the bur…
/r/MensRights16/05/19 05:12 AM
4

Personally, I'm of the mind that it's generally inappropriate to talk about sex unless you're speaking to someone you're intending to have sex with or a certified doctor. Keep that shit on lockdown tighter than religion and politics. ​ You cannot assume that someone is a functioning adult just because they look of age. Better not to learn that lesson the hard way.
/r/MensRights27/04/19 02:55 AM
5

It's called female supremacy, and it's vile.
/r/MensRights27/04/19 02:48 AM
5

Just because the so-called authority has gone mad, doesn't mean that psychology is less of a science. ​ What this means is that the organization pushing these unscientific beliefs can no longer be trusted as an authority. ​ Remember, parts of the government still don't believe climate change is man-made. ​ It took a very long time, and countless lives, for the truth about tobacco and nicotine to get out there. Unfortunately, it will take a long time for the truth to come around about masculinity…
/r/MensRights08/04/19 08:19 PM
17

Exactly this. But people with a poor understanding of capitalism is nothing new in the west, hence it's popularity. ​ It's the very reason why illegal immigrants are hired at all. The risk of being caught with illegal working conditions is worth it, for some scummy people, to grossly underpay and avoid costly business overhead by not complying with state and federal labor regulations. As long as they're not caught, they can save a potential fortune. And the reason why they're not caught, is beca…
/r/MensRights08/04/19 07:33 PM
11

Silly boy, that's the point. It's the same reason there's no discussion about toxic femininity. It was always intended to be a smear. It will never be anything more than a smear. Anyone who uses the term seriously is a feckless science denying halfwit.
/r/MensRights07/04/19 09:59 PM
1

Another menslib apologist. You disgust me. Fuck off you illiterate shit heel.
/r/MensRights09/03/19 03:43 AM
2

Editorialized headline PROJECTS in pandering article because they HATE equality. ​ Am I doing this right?
/r/MensRights09/03/19 03:07 AM
3

Ew. ​ It's two kinds of disgusting in one! Declaring a child's belief system before they can even talk, and pinning real world causes onto fantasy characters.
/r/MensRights09/03/19 02:47 AM
1

Tell me! Tell me! Tell me! Tell me! Act like a petulant child and be treated as one. What is the exact purpose of this subreddit? Read the sidebar, if you can. (ideas about activism) This subreddit reports on Men's charities and activism as it happens, and activism reach-out opportunities happen here as well. If you weren't a random dismissive clown, perhaps you might've noticed that. No, all you guys do is bitch and whine while... Look fool, you'll earn yourself no favors and no answers as long…
/r/MensRights09/03/19 02:13 AM
1

I can tell you’re a random passer by with their head firmly up their ass because you have no idea what we’re working on here. Fuck off.
/r/MensRights08/03/19 08:06 PM
138

Shortage of male caregivers? Free classes for women!
/r/MensRights07/03/19 07:50 PM
0

Oh, so not only are you far too smart for this content, but everyone who isn’t following your example is a fool? Gosh, it must be hard to be so smart.
/r/MensRights07/03/19 04:56 PM
6

And yet it escapes you. I think that speaks for itself.
/r/MensRights07/03/19 04:50 PM
3

Why is this news? The video is from 2015.
/r/MensRights02/03/19 04:23 AM
20

Where have you been? ​ The troglodyte radfems of reddit complain that the egalitarian subreddit has been 'co-oped by MRAs' because they don't have a dominant agenda over there. ​ Feminism is female supremacy. If you're not for it, you're against it. Of course they downvote that concept.
/r/MensRights02/03/19 04:14 AM
1

Spoken like a true capitalist.
/r/MensRights01/03/19 05:51 PM
8

I’m a coding hobbyist at this point (day job in IT), so I might not have mad skills but I’m familiar with node.js. I’d be willing to volunteer some of my free time for this project if I could be of use.
/r/MensRights28/02/19 06:41 PM
8

'On average' is quite the weasel phrase. On average, people have less than two arms. BTW, your auto-correct seems to have slipped. Worst possible places.
/r/MensRights27/02/19 10:59 PM
4

I know there’s little reason to trust random users, but I have experience setting up a wiki. There should be some functionality in reddit to add a simple wiki page for the community. I have the skills, and some free time, if you’re willing to give me permissions.
/r/MensRights27/02/19 07:03 PM
52

Shit dawg, where can I voice my disinterest in this shit show?
/r/MensRights25/02/19 09:12 PM
2

I won't deny he said some stupid shit, but so did Terry Crews; that doesn't make him a "leading advocate" of identity politics.
/r/MensRights23/02/19 04:20 PM
9

“At this point?” You hit me in the face once, it’s coming back at you. Don’t fucking start a fight you can’t finish.
/r/MensRights22/02/19 08:28 PM
14

When was Bernie ever a leading advocate of identity politics? I think you’re confused dude.
/r/MensRights22/02/19 08:11 PM
2

Biologically: puberty, same as girls, generally the same (mostly) time period and done with it by 18. Psychologically: when they’re expected to make a living for themselves without family assistance. (This often hits boys before girls) Emotionally: after having known love, and loss of love. Not necessarily from the same place (family and family pet may suffice). Varies wildly from person to person, boys and girls. Professionally: 5 years in most professions, as little as two years in some milita…
/r/MensRights22/02/19 07:08 PM
5

Isn't it fucking fascinating? ​ Female supremacy is making literally every issue a women's issue. ​ Once again, some nebulous conspiracy is responsible for women performing poorly, not women themselves. Complete responsibility dodge.
/r/MensRights22/02/19 06:37 AM
13

Conversely, I think humans are wired in a way that they can overcome their natural programming. ​ We're humans. We adapt, overcome, survive. We've done away with many baser instincts, this should be no different. Treating humans as nothing more than animals is an excuse for bad behavior, and I won't have it.
/r/MensRights22/02/19 06:25 AM
13

Wamen need special safe spaces to do the same work as men, haven’t you heard?
/r/MensRights21/02/19 04:05 PM
14

Yep! Equality feels like oppression when you’re coming down from a point of privilege.
/r/MensRights21/02/19 04:03 PM
15

What was that study again, women are more neurotic than men? There’s so little settling of women’s irrational paranoia that the anti-vaxxer movement came back around. What else needs to be said?
/r/MensRights20/02/19 07:44 PM
47

Absolutely this. I don’t think I’ve ever encountered a feminist who hasn’t celebrated when women receive preferential treatment. It’s always “about time” and other spiteful excuses.
/r/MensRights20/02/19 03:42 PM
15

Those agents of the media are simply bigots. Plain and simple. If your objections of someone’s qualifications for a position includes natural qualities, you are simply a bigot. The media already failed to do their job when trump got elected, it’s no surprise that they would undermine a candidate that would hold them accountable for their disgusting business practices.
/r/MensRights20/02/19 02:02 PM
4

Sounds delusional. What’s new?
/r/MensRights20/02/19 01:44 PM
1

It’s important to note that just because the American institution has become agenda driven, that psychology is still a science. Keep in mind how long some US officials have continued to deny man-made climate change. Always defer to the science, and not just what the local body has to say.
/r/MensRights15/02/19 03:24 AM
1

Something something empathy gap, something something unrecognized emotional labor.
/r/MensRights14/02/19 11:11 PM
2

Yet American obesity generates significantly more money than that. And there's the real problem. Unhealthy food is ridiculously cheap, gyms are everywhere, diet fads come and go but the industry around them is rock solid. People want to lose weight, but there are numerous social mechanisms in place which actively encourage what are effectively 'food addicts' cruising for their next dopamine hit to load up on calories and fill out like tubs of lard. Reportedly, it "costs" billions of dollars ever…
/r/MensRights13/02/19 12:08 AM
1

There's a lot of psyops going on out there. That's "psychological operations", in laymen's terms. It comes from many directions, not the least of which is feminism and crony capitalism. Men gathering in large numbers is generally frowned upon unless around some innocuous hobby like sports. Men absolutely have rallied in the past, but when they've done so they've typically done it as workers or as soldiers. Relatively few men seem to get caught up in "being a man", "machismo", or any sort of masc…
/r/MensRights12/02/19 11:05 PM
273

There’s already a gaggle of Feminist apologists going on about Patriarchy, how the thread is filled with misogyny, and some dipshit claiming it’s alt-right content. I expect the brigade to get it locked soon.
/r/MensRights12/02/19 09:57 PM
1

You don’t understand what Marxism is, and it’s embarrassing that you’ve been upvoted.
/r/MensRights05/02/19 10:38 PM
1

Hi there. I’m a trans MRA (maybe the only one on the sub, I could be wrong). Do I think transgenderism is sign of cultural collapse? Heavens no. I do, however, believe we’re giving children the option to ruin their lives in a way they’re truly not prepared for. I’m absolutely against puberty blockers and I think that the option of elective surgery should be at the same standard of adulthood we place on drinking. I myself have chosen not to pursue reassignment surgery. I’m a woman trapped in a ma…
/r/MensRights05/02/19 10:08 PM
17

Society has many “empathy deficiencies”, but the world keeps turning. I believe that legal equality is not just obtainable, but fundamentally easy in a functional democracy. That doesn’t mean that you legislate gender roles, but rather that you more explicitly define the rights and privileges of an individual regardless of born quantifiers. There is a toxic undercurrent sometimes exposed in this sub against the science of psychology, but I firmly believe that basic understanding of psychological…
/r/MensRights05/02/19 09:09 PM
4

This just makes sense from a chemical perspective. You're basically taking a drug/hormone cocktail to override biology. That means you're not a natural athlete anymore. ​ No need to laugh at anyone or be insensitive about it.
/r/MensRights02/02/19 12:28 AM
2

It's right around the time when Feminism deftly changed its messaging from Equality to Equity. It's pretty stark. One says "we're all equals". The other says "You fucking owe me shit". "Intersectional Feminism" is a bastion of this entitled bullshit thinking, and everyone who subscribes to it can take a long walk off a tall cliff.
/r/MensRights01/02/19 12:40 AM
5

There's no coincidence that feminists only care about gender equality in high paying jobs and positions of leadership. I disagree strongly with Lethn here, these people are not the least bit socialists. Shaking your fist and saying 'down with the system' means absolutely nothing if you are part of the system and reinforcing the worst aspects of the free market. Actual socialists *are* the working class and they care deeply for workers rights. Feminism is filled with crony capitalists, which is e…
/r/MensRights29/01/19 02:00 AM
11

Definitely horseshit. "Men are hardwired wrong" may not be said explicitly by many, but it's certainly implicit when looking at domestic abuse or consent campaigns. Particularly in schools, men specifically are being targeted as being unfit to interact with other human beings unless they are counseled in proper etiquette as decided by pop psychologists. Psychologists who, statistically, are most likely to be women. Women only tram cars and women only parking are more signs of female privilege. I…
/r/MensRights28/01/19 04:34 AM
4

You know, I really wish MRAs would reclaim 'Nice Guys' the way they stand up to 'Toxic Masculinity'. ​ "Nice Guys" are pick-up artists. They're just playing an angle. It's a complete misnomer, there was nothing ever 'nice' about guys who play a role to score some skirt. ​ Women have categorically shamed actual nice guys with shitty men by conflating the two. To turn a phrase, they have poisoned their own M&Ms. Of course all men start to seem shitty if you can't differentiate between the good one…
/r/MensRights22/01/19 11:23 PM
-2

Some dumb motherfucker doesn't know shit about black people.
/r/MensRights18/01/19 04:57 PM
6

Another creator told not to create because of his gender and skin color. Not the least bit surprising. Yet despite this, you still waver on whether or not men are being oppressed. Doesn't it strike you as odd that men work more hours but women spend more money? Isn't peculiar that only one gender is made to enlist in compulsory service to the military? For thousands of years, women have been made to.. what, cook and clean and raise children? Meanwhile the hunting, the fighting, the building of c…
/r/MensRights15/01/19 11:00 PM
114

Consider this a boon for you. We should all be so lucky that bigots expose themselves so they can be left in the dust.
/r/MensRights23/11/18 05:16 AM
1

Gosh, it's almost as if women are autonomous beings that are responsible for their own actions! Don't tell the feminists, they'll be hysterical.
/r/MensRights20/11/18 03:21 AM
2

Unfortunately, much like modern schools, many modern therapists are unequipped to handle men and male issues.
/r/MensRights20/11/18 03:12 AM
72

The Zero-Sum Fallacy.
/r/MensRights17/11/18 09:26 PM
12

I'm not your pal, friend! You're not my peeps, guys! ​ This retardation comes from under the same rock that thinks masculine language is inherently sexist, such as 'mankind'. There's no point in arguing with the stupid, because it comes from a wholly illogical, emotional place.
/r/MensRights26/10/18 10:59 PM
4

This is exactly why feminists don't care for egalitarians. Pussy before everything else.
/r/MensRights09/10/18 07:12 PM
21

Any time someone posts "think of the sub!" rambling meta posts and doesn't include a single actual example of bad behavior, it just looks like more outsiders trying to divide and conquer. As it's been said: "Be the change you wish to see in the world" If a lack of organization or leadership frustrates you, step up. But, as other threads in this post have revealed, you apparently reset your account every so often to "prevent doxxing", so maybe you aren't cut out for that.
/r/MensRights03/10/18 03:17 PM
1

I'm a liberal liberal. Unironic socialist liberal, AMA. And though it beggars belief, I have seen instances where abortion was used as a form of birth control after the fact. I'm not at all about 'life starts at conception'; by all means, if you cannot take care of a child due to rape origin, medical issue, or so forth, abort while the aborting is humane. I view abortion as a fairly grave life fuck-up. Like filing for bankruptcy, that shit should stay on your record. And I think people who use i…
/r/MensRights01/10/18 11:35 PM
5

There she goes, flushing away her integrity by making it a gendered issue. No, I was a life-long Democrat, but after they drifted to center-right and slept around with corporations, I dropped that baggage at the door. Independent or bust. Your party is no better than the GOP, Warren.
/r/MensRights01/10/18 10:43 PM
15

I used to feel bad for "the silent majority", until I realized how stupid it was. It is unfortunate, but most likely, that the majority of people are silent because they fail to understand the issue. Feminism is accepted by the general populace, despite its many crimes, because of misinformation. The web of lies, history revision, and willful omissions has sufficiently beguiled a populace that accepts ideas based on trust instead of on empirical evidence. The women who speak out against it are f…
/r/MensRights01/10/18 10:21 PM
15

YOU ARE VICTIM BLAMING Where? I dare you to highlight it, because I never did such a thing. YOU are part of the problem and why this shit keeps happening. Absolutely not. I report crimes to the police, for one thing. Quantify how it hurt it life? That isn't possible Absolute horseshit. You can easily quantify the damages of any real crime. There's literally fields of study about the damage that is done by criminals against their victims. She did explain all the questions you asked in the hearing…
/r/MensRights30/09/18 01:58 AM
12

I'm afraid you don't know what you're talking about. If someone says "A crime has been committed against me", my response is "I'm so sorry. What, when, where, and who?". When she comes back with "assault", over thirty years ago, at a location she can't remember, against a current celebrity and "others" she can't recall, then every rational part of my brain asks "Wait, what about witnesses and evidence?", to which there are none... No rational person would believe such a story. I have PTSD. The e…
/r/MensRights30/09/18 01:36 AM
32

Sorry, no. You don't "get raped", then never tell police, then go on to successfully complete your doctorate, then 30+ years later have a hazy revelation to your therapist which fails to include details like where or when it happened. That's not how severe emotional trauma from actual assault works. You want me to believe a successful, married, wealthy, doctor had her life ruined by something she can barely recall? What fucking reality are you from?
/r/MensRights29/09/18 10:59 PM
47

This about sums it up, doesn't it? I'm exhausted from American politics, and I know very little about the accuser or the accused, but this is all of the relevant information you really need here. It seems unbelievably bizarre to me that you would even attempt to go after someone for a crime 30+ years later. But to do so without the time or place, zero evidence, and no witnesses... What're you hoping to achieve except late revenge? That's not justice. And, just from a personal angle here, I was a…
/r/MensRights29/09/18 06:14 PM
-1

I'd love to know how she knows the political leanings of the people behind lynchings. That and her hashtags seem out of place. Otherwise it would have been a good message for everyone.
/r/MensRights29/09/18 05:39 PM
28

"Toxic masculinity" is, and has always been, a veiled way to criticize men by attributing the worst traits in humans to a men exclusively. There is never "toxic femininity" mentioned alongside the concept for balance or context. No matter how feminists want to twist it, the term itself is toxic and misandrist. Accept that men are telling you it's an offensive term, and drop it! Why won't you listen to men's lived experience? Oh, that's right. Because Feminism is about women, not equality, and me…
/r/MensRights28/09/18 03:51 AM
5

I don't disagree, but we're fairly brainwashed by them over here. Our governing officials believe their lies.
/r/MensRights28/09/18 03:02 AM
140

Reddit is a private business, speech is not protected, yadah yadah... But, the nerve of them to put a link to the 'right way' to be a man? Holy shit. TRP is pathetic in its glorification of 'alpha male' and other PUA dogmas, but this is like running over the neighbor's dog and then telling them there are better dogs out there. If they closed TrollX and directed people to where they can act like a "proper" woman, that shit would be international news. Fuckers would be fired. I fucking hate double…
/r/MensRights27/09/18 09:51 PM
1

Exactly this. Every person who has a crime committed against them and does not report it to the police immediately is effectively enabling that criminal to strike again. ​
/r/MensRights26/09/18 04:39 AM
37

You can frame virtually anything as sexist if you try hard. Watch the magic. ​ Clearly this meme is sexist against men as it denigrates them by characterizing them as animals of constant lust, never satisfied with a single partner.
/r/MensRights26/09/18 04:19 AM
0

That's not at all the reason.
/r/MensRights19/09/18 04:22 PM
2

no dictators can survive a capitalistic system for long This might be the funniest/saddest thing I've read all year. Sorry friendo, but you can't seem to distinguish the lines between dictatorship and socialism, nor capitalism and free trade. These things are not synonymous, and I don't bother having drawn out discussions with people who don't understand the meaning of words. But I'll throw you a bone. Here's a youtube video.
/r/MensRights19/09/18 04:21 PM
-2

Capitalism has done more to end poverty than every other system Capitalism has also killed more than every other system. Funny, when your system is around long enough, you get to set all the fun records!
/r/MensRights19/09/18 01:42 AM
16

Anyone who seriously subscribes to the idea of "white privilege" is a walking dumpster fire shy of a lobotomy, full stop. Like, I know the public schools are shit dude, but you clearly have no grasp of history if you fail to understand why Europe prospered and why sub-Saharan Africa did not. We also know scientifically why "cisgender" is the norm, and why men get shit done more often and more effectively than women. It's not superiority, and it's not a conspiracy, it's just history and science. …
/r/MensRights19/09/18 01:12 AM
39

Can you fucking imagine the reaction there would be if some major publication even so much as retweeted the allegation that a female politician's bits looked unusual? Goddamn hellfire, ended careers, pulled ads, public apologies, the whole nine yards. But hey, here's a laugh, let's talk about the president's junk. For fuck sake American media, this is why you're a joke.
/r/MensRights19/09/18 12:57 AM
4

Hard to decide which is worse here: women behaving badly and getting away with it (as usual)? Or how bitterly low some men's self esteem is to put up with such nonsense?
/r/MensRights22/08/18 12:49 AM
2

For fuck sake man, read a book.
/r/MensRights02/08/18 10:53 PM
11

YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND, IT WAS HER TURN! /s You're not wrong. Between Hillary and MeToo, female privilege has been off the charts. Like, pussy hats off the charts. The Dems shirked the mantle of the able bodied Liberal power by losing to an utter buffoon, but what do you expect when your horse is a crook and everyone knows it? IMO, this enabled the lunatic fringe of the US's liberals to rally under antifa and other aggressive progressive (aka regressive) movements. To make matters about ten times …
/r/MensRights28/05/18 09:57 PM
26

Replace "#MeToo" with "Modern Feminism" and it might have been a refreshingly honest article. The "Mike Pence Rule" came about in 2002 because the problem of false accusations has been around for a while; it comes directly from a toxic strain of feminism that enables and excuses the bad behavior of women as justified reparations from a wildly exaggerated revisionist history of female suffering. Feminism preaches historical victimhood, and modern "movements" such as MeToo and SJWs are just polyps…
/r/MensRights28/05/18 09:35 PM
4

I think "objectification" has been warped and stretched to include normal human sexuality in much the same way that "misogyny" has devolved to include disagreeing with an individual. Everything associated with the term is useless now. It's wreckage and scrap. I cannot possibly give a shit when you lump in actual psychotic rapists with they shy kid who won't say hello and is therefore "creepy". Your net is so fucking wide that you're catching brine shrimp and acting like it's a prize catch. Actua…
/r/MensRights10/05/18 06:23 PM
15

Then don't get whiplash when people turn around and say the same thing about women.
/r/MensRights26/04/18 06:19 PM
17

IMO thats textbook socialism You don't understand capitalism or socialism very much if you believe that. Socialism wants to redistribute power from the few to a democratic mechanism (aka 'the many'). Like it or not, the working class is the vast majority of people. Consolidating power to a few people is the anti-thesis of socialism. This is also why I contest when people attempt to link Feminism and Socialism. Socialism must be democratic, but Feminism prefers authoritarianism. That's partly why…
/r/MensRights18/04/18 05:25 PM
38

What trash. This is just Feminism attempting to co-opt another group to grow their numbers. Same thing they did with gay rights and "people of color". Feminism loves capitalism. Particularly, it loves the consolidation of power held by a select few. This pamphlet full of buzzwords desperately tries to make feminism relevant to socialism, and fails in every way. It's no wonder their website is garbage either. I sincerely doubt anyone associated with the "DSA" even has a real understanding of what…
/r/MensRights18/04/18 04:49 PM
1

You know how Americans fucked up their healthcare system by handing it to private corporations? Imagine that, but for schools. We love capitalism so much we're drowning in it.
/r/MensRights12/04/18 09:09 PM
0

So you've got Fuller. The second quote on Friedan is nothing but red scare guilt-by-association at best. There are no leaders in the third wave, which is specifically why I dared you to name them. And your final line reinforces what I said initially, that Marx is 'too right' for modern feminism. It's really weird though that you haven't adequately connected Marx and feminism even though you claim "the central component" is so similar. I expect it's because you can't, and your entire premise rest…
/r/MensRights13/03/18 06:07 AM
0

I didn't say any of what you say I did. Yes you did. You specifically said: Marx says society is ran by a wealthy class which constantly oppresses the labor class. Feminism teaches the same thing with different labels It's reductionist and wrong. Backpedal all you like by claiming that "feminist leaders" (honestly, can you name any?) have historically been socialists, that doesn't mean that feminism and marxism are even remotely similar. If this is the result of years of study, then it's high ti…
/r/MensRights12/03/18 10:13 PM
3

Egalitarianism. And yes, there's a sub for it. /r/Egalitarianism
/r/MensRights12/03/18 09:02 PM
-4

Furthermore, feminism has strong parallels to Marxist theory. Wrong sir. "Cultural Marxism" is a myth. You might as well attribute all gun deaths to video games because they're coincidentally violent. It's a gross misunderstanding of Marx to claim that "replace bourgeoisie with patriarchy" = feminism. For the first matter, Marx wasn't alive when 'cultural marxism' was supposedly developed, missing the infamous 'Frankfurt school' by over 80 years posthumously. Second, the bourgeoisie are not some…
/r/MensRights12/03/18 09:01 PM
2

You seem to know very little about women in power if you think that there were so few and far between that they had literally no influence on how their nations operated. Are you trying to imply... gasp! that men have made the major decisions in history because they have more power? If patriarchy theory is real, as you seem to believe (pause to laugh), then why aren't women more thankful for the freedoms they've been permitted? Honestly, if men are and always have been in control, why aren't wome…
/r/MensRights08/03/18 06:21 PM
3

Reading comprehension would do a world of good. So would a few history books if all you can do is list the pop icon versions of female politicians. Women in power are historically more ruthless than their male counterparts, and have done little to nothing for other women. Who granted women voting rights? Men. Who pioneered medicine for women? Men. Who protected their wives by going to the battlefield? Men. Gosh, if only women were as good for feminism as men were, they might actually accomplish …
/r/MensRights08/03/18 05:56 PM
2

That's right, because women have never ever been in any form of power or control for the entire history of the human race. Get this fucking muppet out of here.
/r/MensRights08/03/18 05:48 PM
1

Back the truck up. Who controls society? If you answered men, you're a moron. The correct answer is: Wealth. What you've done is poorly constructed the question to extract the answer you wanted, completely ignoring the actual issue. Do you think that generals get aroused by sending countless men to their deaths in the name of land disputes? If this truly was about gender, wouldn't men have strapped women to their fronts as meat shields while marching towards victory? No. Patriarchy theory is a c…
/r/MensRights08/03/18 05:44 PM
19

I am a subscriber and I see a lot of people trying to take rights away from women instead of looking for men’s rights. You're a lying piece of shit, mr. "arbitrary comment"
/r/MensRights08/03/18 05:38 PM
21

This, all day everyday. Fuck the liars.
/r/MensRights08/03/18 05:37 PM
1

You actually take patriarchy theory seriously. You're a living joke. A fucking cartoon. How can I not laugh?
/r/MensRights08/03/18 05:31 PM
2

Like everything else you've posted, this is total horse shit.
/r/MensRights08/03/18 05:28 PM
5

Unfortunately for the west, we're still quite prudish over here about sex. The whole subject matter is a mess. We still don't have uniform standards for teaching sex education in schools. The media presents men as sex hungry ravagers while portraying women as gentle flowers waiting for true love. Even as attitudes have shifted somewhat, the topic of sex for women's magazines is all about getting the most of it while the topic of sex in men's magazines is how to get more of it by conforming to wh…
/r/MensRights27/02/18 10:55 PM
5

Can we drop the politics and call them what they are? Mentally deranged.
/r/MensRights27/02/18 10:14 PM
7

Lucky or not, I haven't had much experience with the bad sides of MRAs just yet. The good news is, you don't have to label yourself as an MRA to be welcome in MRA company. Just, you know, don't be a shitty person. :) Egalitarian has much less baggage associated with it, if you have to call yourself something, but don't feel compelled to.
/r/MensRights27/02/18 09:45 PM
28

IMO, the majority of MRAs would be egalitarian but feel Men's Rights need more focus than equal opportunity. We adore equal opportunity, and it's clear that men lack a number of support structures, rights, and freedoms that women have. Feminism has been taken over by multiple interests, ranging from female supremacy, general misandry, and misdirection for women's shortcomings to "intersectionality" which is trying to retrofit racial awareness and LGBT into feminist theory. Any trace of "making w…
/r/MensRights27/02/18 08:14 PM
10

And this is why MRAs stand against Feminism. Feminism is a hate group.
/r/MensRights23/02/18 09:27 PM
6

I'm just going to say it: Terrible, unintelligent, sexist articles like these lower my opinion of women in general.
/r/MensRights21/02/18 05:22 PM
24

Rebuttal to this trash piece, summed up in the "bias test". "Women like to receive compliments about their physical appearance. (T/F)" Anyone with a functioning brain should say true. Everyone who isn't suffering some kind of psychological trauma appreciates compliments. The article claims this is false. I say, your questions are worded badly and you should feel bad. Compliments on appearance in the office aren't professional, but that doesn't change the fact the majority of all women who have e…
/r/MensRights20/02/18 10:17 PM
5

We've known single parenting is bad for kids for a while. But even implying single mothers can't do the work of both parents goes against mainstream feminist dogma. The US will continue to wallow in the blood of adolescent murderers and victims until it can separate the myths of how it thinks society works and how it has been demonstrated to function in other, better countries. Our gun culture is fucked, our mental healthcare systems are virtually non-existent, and young men in particular have l…
/r/MensRights19/02/18 05:37 PM
1

I think that the reality of mental illness is something many people don't want to confront, much like mortality itself. The truth of it is, you could be hit by a drunk driver any time you're out on the road and you have little to no control over that. Similarly, one day you could have a mental break which triggers a full blown psychosis. Your faculties could suddenly no longer be under your coherent control. It's terrifying, but it's true. And different things will break different people in diff…
/r/MensRights19/02/18 06:19 AM
19

"This isn't about mental illness" If you think mass murder is a sane activity, get your head examined post-haste.
/r/MensRights18/02/18 11:41 PM
13

I want to like Canada for being a slightly more progressive US on some issues like healthcare, but they have such a fucking problem with this openly sexist anti-male bullshit. The whole story sounds like grown women acting like children and voting someone off the island for an unpopular opinion. Typical hen bullshit, then manipulated to look like the man is at fault, but the only reason it got to the news outlet is because the lad took it to the highest place that would hear his story. Maybe I'm…
/r/MensRights14/02/18 12:50 AM
94

As a reminder for possible new visitors to Men's Rights... Posts like these highlight the double-standard between glorifying female sexuality and demonizing male sexuality. In this case, the broadly known publication of Cosmopolitan has showcased a gallery of male athletes in tight clothing, referring to them by their bulges. Typically, the reverse article would be shouted down by women's rights activists as misogyny for objectifying women. Can you imagine how much brand damage would be done if …
/r/MensRights14/02/18 12:05 AM
1

It's because everything in their mixed up little world is wrapped up in emotions and hidden meanings and they have to gush all of it out on paper as if it means something. Truth is simple and wit is best brief. These women tell stories because they're making shit up.
/r/MensRights13/02/18 09:41 PM
11

Vice is hot garbage. It's no surprise they're diametrically opposed to men's rights when they repeat feminist myths unironically.
/r/MensRights05/02/18 10:27 PM
2

I don't know whether or not "social philosophy A" is a natural fit with "economic policy B", but there is a definite similarity between Men's Rights and Labor Rights. The difficulty of convincing the masses that they're being disenfranchised. They've grown so accustomed to being shit on, and things getting worse over time, the only change they can dream of a post-apocalypse. They fight for the status quo, even though it harms them, because they fear things getting even worse. Americans may have …
/r/MensRights30/01/18 08:34 PM
10

Men's lib is a feminist apologist dumpster fire. Always has been, always will be.
/r/MensRights25/01/18 05:29 PM
1

Get the poor to fight among themselves and the wealthy will get away with mass murder, every damn time.
/r/MensRights22/01/18 07:19 PM
1

"Cultural Marxism" (aka Cultural Imperialism) has nothing to do with Karl Marx. Even a cursory glance at when the Frankfurt school took place, decades after Marx's death, should make that clear, but people love clutching their red scare pearls. Just call it what it is. Cultural Imperialism.
/r/MensRights17/01/18 10:34 PM
31

Shhhh. She didn't think that much about it, neither should you. ;)
/r/MensRights30/11/17 09:22 PM
3

Sounds like a sexist dipshit, through and through. I had a similar problem with a lady friend. When she started making sexist FB posts, we dissolved our friendship. IMO, shit bags like this don't learn until they've been left friendless from their hysterical bigotry.
/r/MensRights29/11/17 05:57 PM
2

seemingly deranged I think you misunderstand how many of these people are actually deranged. Lunatics roam the streets, boys and girls. We don't do anything about them until they commit crimes, and even then they rarely get the necessary medical attention they so sorely need. Selling out your family for money is sociopathy. Problem is, we've normalized sociopathic behavior; so instead of labeling these people as dangerous and disturbed, we just consider them to be assholes and effectively enable…
/r/MensRights29/11/17 05:49 PM
9

It was the commitment to murder which clued me in to her slight case of total insanity.
/r/MensRights27/11/17 05:13 PM
14

Radical feminists honestly believe that there are special and perhaps even sacred attributes to being a woman that a man could never understand. Even if a genetically perfect total transformation mechanism existed to swap one sex to another, they would argue that you didn't experience growing up female. It's called female supremacy. They don't believe there are any unique positive male properties, only female ones. It resembles racist mentality because it's bigotry, plain and simple.
/r/MensRights25/11/17 09:26 PM
5

Anecdotally, I had the reverse happen. Mentioned to my boss that our knowledge base had a ton of out of date articles which made searching it difficult because of the amount of expired info. Said I'd be happy to work on it as a side project. The next week, he appoints miss "i need to leave early for a family thing" to lead the project; effectively killing it in the crib. Never had a single goal presented or deadline implemented. Six months later, I left the company and we had yet to do a single …
/r/MensRights23/11/17 06:31 PM
1

As a former democrat, I agree with them. Feminism and "social justice" have ready allies in the left, useful idiots that prostrate themselves in front of postmodernist bullshit because they believe they're being morally sound and socially just. Particularly the leveraging of academia to advance their beliefs, a lot of the mental rot surrounding "privilege" is coming directly out of American left playbooks. The hubris behind Hillary and "it's her turn" is a fine example. The right just isn't as s…
/r/MensRights13/11/17 04:58 PM
0

Although it's often said that post modernism is "neo-marxist", I have yet to hear a single compelling argument that ties anything about feminism, postmodernism, or social justice to actual marxism. Not unlike OP's picture, it seems to be a limp-wristed slur attempting to tie an unrelated issue to a "known bad actor". Feminism is trash, postmodernism is garbage, critical theory is a fucking joke; but none of them are related to Marx. Trying to pin the atrocities of the present on ghosts of the pa…
/r/MensRights13/11/17 04:48 PM
1

Ew. Fuck so cal. Light that shit state on fire and shove it into the ocean.
/r/MensRights13/11/17 04:41 PM
82

Why is this posted here? Serious question. What on earth do you think communism has to do with anything in this thread? Look around, bright eyes. "Commies" are not a problem that men have, anywhere in the developed world. Knock off your jingo faux-patriot bullshit. Plutocrats have seized control of the world, not communists. When it comes to mens rights, I'm much more concerned that the companies I work for are trying to screw me out of parental leave, medical benefits, and overtime rather than …
/r/MensRights13/11/17 04:05 PM
22

I'd be more concerned with how we're raising women to be idiots, if I were her. Of course, she's part of the problem, so what else is new?
/r/MensRights03/11/17 06:52 PM
12

Ultimately, all the jobs will go as another poster said. However, let's break this down a bit. Arguably several waves of automation have already hit, taking away jobs and raising productivity per worker (though pay stagnates). From looms to typewriters to remote workers, this trend of jobs going away as technology progresses isn't exactly new. The next foreseeable wave of automation is going to be logistics. Automated warehouses, self-driving semis, air drone delivery systems; a shit ton of pred…
/r/MensRights23/10/17 12:35 AM
44

Because "Social Justice" is bigotry in a glamorous new psuedo-religion of self righteous dogma. Basically, give a bunch of sheltered morons a reason to feel superior to others and they'll jump at the chance. I blame the continued decline of our schools, deterioration of the family unit, and exploitation of the average worker coupled with a medical system utterly incapable of handling the growing specter of mental illness brought on by modern miseries.
/r/MensRights19/10/17 08:38 PM
1

You haven't provided any data! And I have refuted your claims, quite handily at that. There was no personal disparagement. You're literally making shit up.
/r/MensRights29/08/17 03:21 PM
7

Come on dude, this was shit posted less than a month ago. It has literally nothing to do with Men's Rights.
/r/MensRights29/08/17 04:23 AM
2

It's always good to keep alternatives in your back pocket in case shit goes down. But it's also important to keep a visible presence to influence the normies until you're forced to withdraw. Ideologically we shouldn't have much to worry about, but it seems every time a post hits all there's a gaggle of morons ready to conflate us with incels and T_D. We're probably on some list of subs to nuke if the culture war starts to get messy.
/r/MensRights29/08/17 04:09 AM
6

It's not entirely untrue. Sargon does hate socialism.
/r/MensRights29/08/17 04:01 AM
1

So, in other words... No. All you have is a 40 minute video of nonsense. Not a single citation. Just speculation extrapolated from cultural theorists on youtube. If you drop "marxist" from your vocabulary, which you should since you're using it incorrectly, people might take you a little more seriously. The marxists aren't out to get you. There's very, very few actual marxists left in the world, and those that exist are concerned with capitalism, not feminism. You should be complaining about pos…
/r/MensRights29/08/17 03:58 AM
1

Can you provide a single citation regarding Marx's writings on culture or equality? Just one. Any one will do. Anything from Marx. I'm well aware of the Frankkurt school theory. But I'm also well aware that economics does not translate into cultural analysis. Karl Marx was not alive when the Frankfurt school convened. There is no possible way that what came out of those meetings could have been "Marxism". The proper term is for attempting to take over a culture is Cultural Imperialism. Always ha…
/r/MensRights29/08/17 03:36 AM
1

Be honest. This is the first thread you've posted on in MensRights in over 6 months. You were never subscribed. You're just another rando from all that had to virtue signal about how disgusted you are that someone made a shitpost about a feminist talking point.
/r/MensRights29/08/17 03:25 AM
1

That's funny, because this is literally the only post you've made in this sub for over 3 months. Perhaps ever. Did you honestly ever care about MensRights as a movement if a picture of a man carrying a woman and child in flood waters "caused you to unsubscribe"? Are you sure you're not just virtue signalling?
/r/MensRights29/08/17 03:19 AM
1

There are dozens of great posts every week on MensRights which focus on men's issues. Shit posts make it to all more frequently because they're a single image or short comic. That's just the nature of reddit. If you gave a shit about men's rights, you would know this by now. But it's pretty clear you're just a rando from all who got his panties in a twist.
/r/MensRights29/08/17 03:07 AM
2

You can't link to other subreddits from here because it's considered brigading. Read the rules, it's literally in the sidebar. Btw, MensLib is complete trash.
/r/MensRights29/08/17 03:03 AM
2

Dude. Dude. You know nothing about Marx. Marx wrote about economics, not equality. Cultural Imperialism has nothing to do with Marxism. "Cultural Marxism" is a commies ruin everything red scare bullshit smear. Stop it.
/r/MensRights29/08/17 02:59 AM
6

The American college system is a joke, that's how.
/r/MensRights22/08/17 04:13 AM
2

So it is! Salon is also trash. Shame on me for trusting the title.
/r/MensRights19/08/17 03:21 AM
21

Thanks for the kind words. Do they really believe their anti MRA slander or did they set out to deliberately deceive. A little of column A, a little of column B. The authors of the original hit pieces may be deliberately lying or, honestly, a bit tweaked in the head... but then you have an absolute gaggle of useful idiots that propagate and repeat the nonsense over and over. It's a bit like anti-vaxxers. The origin of the myth behind "vaccines cause autism" could be chalked up to malicious inten…
/r/MensRights18/08/17 10:53 PM
2

Yup!
/r/MensRights18/08/17 10:33 PM
6

Salon is far left trash. First they called MRAs "GamerGaters". Then they called MRAs "alt right". Now they're calling us "Nazis". What will the next icky thing I don't like be? Why even bother to entertain their hysterical propaganda mongering?
/r/MensRights18/08/17 10:23 PM
4

We are being held responsible for the radicalization of young men in the USA. Wrong. We are being accused of radicalization by far left pundits who refuse to acknowledge the truth that their anti-"straight white male" rhetoric has backfired tremendously and is rapidly pushing more men towards Men's Rights in the centrist spectrum and other further right groups in response. Let's take a moment to separate ourselves from any toxic woman-hating bullshit. We do not engage in woman-hating bullshit. W…
/r/MensRights18/08/17 10:04 PM
16

Is anyone else disturbed that this is being upvoted? No, because he's right. Marginalization begets radicalization. The same hostile forces which drive men to men's rights are also the forces which drive some men into the toxic cultures of incels and white supremacy. Slate, in its far left bias, refuses to acknowledge the bad actors of the left which push people towards the middle and sometimes to various degrees of the right. That doesn't mean that all men who face the hostility of social justi…
/r/MensRights18/08/17 08:30 PM
11

Radicalization isn't coming from this community, it's coming from the far left, radical feminists, and "social justice" types that have codified the notion that white males are disposable trash. About the only thing we can do is to push back against these negative messengers and offer men a neutral place to understand they do have value and acceptance.
/r/MensRights18/08/17 08:25 PM
16

I disagree. Slate has numerous instances of spreading misinformation to smear ideological opponents. Once you cross the line of propaganda peddling, you are absolutely engaging in extremist tactics. That qualifies slate as far left.
/r/MensRights18/08/17 08:15 PM
21

Slate has always been a tool of the far left. It should come as no surprise that they're willing to dehumanize those that dare to question the narrative of so-called justice.
/r/MensRights18/08/17 03:28 PM
36

"againsthatesubreddits" is a social justice skewed echo chamber. Note that they attribute the comments of single users to the entire subreddit they're posting in. One person in pussypassdenied says something nasty, ahs reports it as the entire subreddit endorsing them. One person in kotakuinaction makes a tasteless statement, ahs reports it as standard practice for all users. cringeanarchy posting makes a joke about seatbelts, ahs paints it as homophobia. The fact is, MensRights openly discusses…
/r/MensRights16/08/17 01:18 AM
6

TIL the middle east has figured out how to go against biology. Nah bro, it's cultural.
/r/MensRights15/08/17 11:52 PM
10

Feminism, not unlike capitalism, works in boom and bust cycles. For some years you'll see "Girl power!" and a bunch of cheer leading about how women can accomplish anything if they set their minds to it. That's the boom cycle, a high octane ego trip that nothing can go wrong because of.. estrogen, or something. Again, like capitalism, it's pretty baseless and driven almost entirely by high profile speculators after a recession. Then you get the bust cycle. Ugh, how could things be so bad? Realit…
/r/MensRights15/08/17 09:25 PM
-2

This is... I don't know what this is. Why is this post on Men's Rights? Everyone's lives are better under socialism, provided it's not a totalitarian regime (and the two concepts are separate). Improved workers rights, potentially state funded child care, better working conditions, enhanced automation initiatives... People often forget that socialism and communism spread due to the benefits they provided to the average citizen. Unfortunately, almost all attempts at socialism have been conducted …
/r/MensRights14/08/17 03:26 AM
48

Remember, feminism dismantled female gender roles. Male gender roles are still very much in effect, which is why men are still judged for their height, virility, and income (amidst other things). Labeling a man as a virgin is an attempt to degrade their virility. And because attacking men is more socially acceptable than attacking women, you'll see sexist assholes toss around virgin shaming comments with gusto. Try to shame a woman for being infertile though, and you'll be accused of being a hat…
/r/MensRights14/08/17 02:52 AM
8

Um... The loudest champions of Men's Rights are women. Christina Hoff Sommers and Karen Straughan are two of MR's most consistent figureheads. Quite frankly, there aren't a whole lot of other people who go to bat for men without muddying the message; but I can't think of any women haters that MRM champions.
/r/MensRights13/08/17 04:46 PM
22

More racist, sexist bigotry from the regressive left. To the surprise of no one, everyone that doesn't agree with their myopic worldview is a nazi.
/r/MensRights13/08/17 04:51 AM
25

2017 is peak 3rd wave feminism. You simply can't get anymore batshit crazy than this. Feminism: Hold my beer
/r/MensRights11/08/17 09:39 PM
3

I see you didn't actually read the article. NPR is in the article because this site wrote a story about the portion of an article NPR wrote. NPR is the original source of the claim that women stayed home.
/r/MensRights09/08/17 10:36 PM
3

What do you expect from NPR?
/r/MensRights09/08/17 07:09 PM
1

Quality reporting from NPR.
/r/MensRights09/08/17 07:04 PM
1

There may have been a hiccup, but it's not missing.
/r/MensRights08/08/17 11:54 PM
0

It's called Cultural Imperialism.
/r/MensRights04/08/17 03:10 PM
1

I agree with you on a number of things, but this I do not. Neo-liberals, as I call them, are not a capitalist conspiracy. Now, there's very little doubt in my mind that companies and political parties court these extremists as a smokescreen for shadier shit, but their genesis is not the result of a planned attack. They're useful idiots of their own design. Like Anti-vaxxers and the gluten-free trend, there is an undercurrent of anti-intellectualism in the west. With rapid communication tools and…
/r/MensRights01/08/17 06:35 AM
9

Misandry is happening.
/r/MensRights27/07/17 03:27 AM
3

Clinically, I'm trans. I have been diagnosed with gender dysphoria. But I haven't transitioned. I look like a man, I sound like a man, just call me a man. I have no intention to cross dress without HRT because there's no way in hell I would pass as a woman without it. I'm not going to claim to be a trans-woman prior to having procedures done, and IMO, neither should anyone else. You're not a home buyer until you've filed the paperwork, you're just a home shopper. Same situation. All those gender…
/r/MensRights24/07/17 06:13 AM
14

Consider that "equal rights for all" is allegedly under the gendered label of feminism. Feminists are sexist by design. It's right in the title. Feminists justify sexism because that's the core of their mission statement, to elevate and excuse women only. If you've been duped into believing feminists care about equality rather than equity, wait until you hear about 'trickle down economics'. Same con. "Once we have all the power, everyone else will benefit too". Yeah right. Why do you think femin…
/r/MensRights24/07/17 01:59 AM
7

On the subject of male suicide: It's not just that there's stigma about getting help, in some cases there simply isn't help for men. I should know, I was in hospital for a suicide attempt last year. They held me for four days, I had a single therapy session which was a half hour recap of everything that lead to my admission, and then... fucking nothing. They discharged me. Once I was medicated enough that the suicidal ideation had passed, they were done with me. Nothing was done to address the i…
/r/MensRights22/05/17 12:52 AM
24

Easy fix: Tear that stupid shit down. Anyone is allowed to pee standing up, some people are just better at it than others.
/r/MensRights17/05/17 06:25 PM
7

Revisionist feminist history. The entire concept of "the patriarchy" falls apart if you just look back 100 years and see that, oops, kings and queens have been imposing bullshit means of control onto their subjects since they were tribal leaders in grass huts. Democracy is such a new and novel concept it hasn't even reached every country on earth yet, but revisionist feminist history makes it seem like men have always had agency. It's crap.
/r/MensRights07/05/17 03:04 AM
6

"Men are people too"
/r/MensRights06/05/17 06:12 PM
16

For everyone not getting it: Imagine if GQ published an article explaining why you should never go down on a woman again. Just be manipulative and dump any woman who won't give you oral sex without reciprocation. When in doubt, lie. Protest imaginary oppression by refusing your partner. But seriously, why even have a relationship when you work so hard? Women orgasm too much, they should stop. No one can hear you talk with a mouthful of muff. Lying is always an acceptable alternative to being an …
/r/MensRights21/04/17 05:53 AM
4

I can't speak for Europe since I've lived in the US all my life, but it seems that much of Feminism's abuse of the English language and re-defining of words also came from our sickly shores. Our government is corrupt, our schools are failing, and our language is being confused by ideologues at every turn. I don't dare try to quantify a percentage of Americans that are capable of "thinking clearly" anymore.
/r/MensRights20/04/17 10:22 PM
2

She's a feminist shill, which is about as far away from Marxism as one can get. But Americans aren't terribly good at understanding terms associated with the cold war.
/r/MensRights20/04/17 10:13 PM
7

Same. :\
/r/MensRights18/04/17 10:36 AM
13

What's the expression? "If everyone you meet smells like shit, check your own shoes"? Whether or not she feels like a whore, she definitely hasn't figured out how sex works if she can't find a good partner after 16 tries.
/r/MensRights18/04/17 10:35 AM
12

In the 80s, I believed we might in my lifetime come together as brothers and sisters of all nations and work for the betterment of the entire human race. Today, I have no such hope for the future, and certainly not in my lifetime.
/r/MensRights11/04/17 07:09 PM
65

"I'm neutral" Nothing says extremism like attacking neutral parties. Very lovely cult Feminism has ballooned into, isn't it?
/r/MensRights06/04/17 09:13 PM
1

When did things get so bad? Within the past 20 years, I think. Sometime in the late 90s I noticed a rise in 'women only' events and positions. It seemed to be the fringe at the time, but it's snowballed and become a mainstream issue. Women are taught to discriminate, and feminism teaches them.
/r/MensRights04/04/17 07:15 PM
5

They are required to support this. Bullshit. That's as tone deaf as saying men have to go to war because they're the physically stronger sex. Google isn't "required" to do jack shit regarding popular social myths. Just as Tesla wasn't "required" to work with car dealerships. Never absolve someone, or a company, of having integrity or doing the right thing because of expectations. That's a bogus argumentum ad antiquitatem.
/r/MensRights04/04/17 07:04 PM
1

IMO, those aren't transgender activists, those are transtrender idiots; make-believe "genderfluid" assholes that are hijacking legitimate transgender issues for their own personal drama. Gender Dysphoria is when your life is significantly impacted by a disconnection between your psychological gender and your physical appearance. Either you're a man who wants to be a woman, or you're a woman who wants to be a man. Two sexes, two pronouns; that's how our language has evolved. While I agree that th…
/r/MensRights02/04/17 06:08 PM
8

^ This is the most concise answer.
/r/MensRights02/04/17 12:48 AM
12

When children can tell that society is crumbling, it's begs the question of why the adults can't.
/r/MensRights02/04/17 12:41 AM
7

Oh, the "sugar and spice and everything nice" line was driven home hard in my youth. It wasn't even from my family, it was just the media I was surrounded by. Oprah was the more important talkshow because she was a woman, the women characters were never sent on the dangerous recon missions in the action cartoons, and show after show had men just stumbling over themselves to lay presents and flowers at girls' feet in an attempt to marry them (remember, these were cartoons and I was a kid. Nobody …
/r/MensRights31/03/17 11:42 PM
2

hardcore anti-capitalists. lol, where are those? I think I've seen all of five intelligent posters on economics on reddit, and they were in the technology subreddit. r/LateStageCapitalism and r/Socialism are just whiny hipster subs. They have no concrete goals, and not so much of the slightest hint of a plan to reach them. I've been banned from both for saying as much. Hardcore anti-capitalists don't post memes all day, they march on Moscow and overthrow the government. We don't have hardcore an…
/r/MensRights31/03/17 10:45 PM
10

Welcome to Feminism reasoning! If someone has something I don't have, their group must be withholding it from me. Get with the program, shit heels. Most men don't have mentors either. Capitalism has ensured that businesses will pay their employees the least amount possible, and this includes on the job training. Mentorships effectively died when mentors had neither the time, nor money, to offer their skills to understudies. It's not men, ladies. It's society. Society is broken, and you're trying…
/r/MensRights30/03/17 11:17 PM
13

Feminist theory is retarded. It believes that rapists simply haven't been told that rape is bad. As in, someone forgot to teach them how, so let's tell them as adults that rape is bad. That's the logic. That's all there is. The reasoning power of a five year old. There's no consideration about mental illness or affordable access to treatment for those who might be compelled to act out terrible urges. There's no call for the UK's closed circuit survielence to make the streets safer. There's no in…
/r/MensRights30/03/17 07:28 PM
2

Sexist, racist, and woefully ignorant of every issue involved. Mass shooters are all nuts, but relatively few of them are god complex nuts. And let's not pretend that being a sociopath is limited to men. Everyone in DeathNote is Japanese. Oh shit, are they white today? where's my progressive stack calendar?! You've got to be pretty fucking racist to categorize something as a "white story", not that a fucking anime could ever be one. Technically, it was the shinigami that did the magic, not the a…
/r/MensRights25/03/17 12:30 AM
1

If there was a magic bullying solution, I think we would have found it by now. There isn't one. I disagree, strongly. You could apply the fallacy of 'we would have found it by now' to almost anything, and it's comical. Just go back 100 years, and clean energy didn't exist. Well goddamn if we didn't find it in over 3000 years of human civilization, it must not exist! We're still hammering out the concept of equal rights for adult humans. We, as a society, know extremely little about psychology. T…
/r/MensRights22/03/17 12:08 AM
14

You're thinking a bit too narrow. Circumcision is an optional, but still billable, procedure. It doesn't matter if Dr. Rabbi Tuckman (spot the reference) is personally making money off it, the hospital is. Every pill, every consultation, every procedure is something they can tack onto the bill in a capitalist healthcare system. Why else do you think a completely optional medical procedure would be performed on children, if not for religion? Someone is making money.
/r/MensRights18/03/17 12:36 AM
2

"Racist republicans" from the other side. It's just an empty slur.
/r/MensRights16/03/17 09:04 PM
5

That's a whole lot of over simplification mixed with some wrong in order to justify lumping things together in an out-group and calling them the same thing. Similarities != Related Correlation != Causation
/r/MensRights16/03/17 08:51 PM
12

I hate feminism as much as the next MRA, but this has got to be one of the dumbest things I've seen in this sub. Nothing in OP's post mentions either communism or feminism, you just made shit up from thin air. Park that bullshit in /r/conspiracy and talk about actual issues with evidence please.
/r/MensRights16/03/17 08:42 PM
-1

Speak up, coward. If you want to challenge me, do so directly.
/r/MensRights15/03/17 06:45 AM
-1

I read the article Contradicts immediately with this question Also, how do our cells have sexes? I'm done with you. You either lack the integrity or the reading comprehension to discuss this issue with scientifically documented sources. Goodbye.
/r/MensRights14/03/17 09:47 PM
0

I've read through the entirety of your first article Doubtful. You clearly didn't even get to paragraph four, which contains the line: What's more, new technologies in DNA sequencing and cell biology are revealing that almost everyone is, to varying degrees, a patchwork of genetically distinct cells, some with a sex that might not match that of the rest of their body. I mean, there's literally a section of the article titled "The sex spectrum" Here's another quote from the article you didn't rea…
/r/MensRights14/03/17 07:55 PM
3

You're right. Unfortunately, there are a handful of Luddites around here which are unable to recognize the difference between biological sex and social gender norms. The worst of them seem to think this concept is "confusing society". Shit son, if you're confused about your gender, maybe you should be. Start asking questions! Your genitals do not define your personality. Biologically, gender exists in more of a spectrum than a binary. Go ahead and take a spin, that's an international science jou…
/r/MensRights14/03/17 05:01 PM
7

Y'know, I was going to write out this whole thing about thought experiments and how many things can be relative and situational, and also the definition of various words; thought crimes versus real crimes, maybe some tragedy of the commons in there too... But fuck it. Why bother discussing philosophy on reddit? Neither of us will get anything out of it. In conclusion: You have not provided a logical assertion. Moral absolutes (Of course, always, never) are not rooted in sound reason. Asserting w…
/r/MensRights12/03/17 06:22 AM
3

Revisionist history. If you keep telling people that a development is recent, they'll take your word for it and forget about recorded history. Feminism needs revisionist history, because there have been so many women heads of state throughout history who did fuck all for women's rights. Countless women pioneers in dozens of fields have been sacrificed upon the altar of "oppression", the vivid life stories of tremendous women that lived well before feminism was even a fucking word left in a memor…
/r/MensRights12/03/17 01:19 AM
2

That's an awfully long way to spell "hypocrite", but message received. Bye bye, useless trash sack!
/r/MensRights11/03/17 01:15 AM
13

We love advocating for change. The problem is, Men's issues aren't taken seriously because they're constantly undermined and attacked by feminists. When speakers for Men's issues are silenced by radical feminists willing to pull fire alarms and protest our right to assemble, then we have to tackle the blockade before we can speak at the podium. But why are you here, if not to shit on Men's Rights? Are you doing anything proactive, for anyone besides yourself? Or are you just a hypocrite?
/r/MensRights11/03/17 12:25 AM
17

Because we highlight the absurdities of feminists?
/r/MensRights11/03/17 12:07 AM
7

I would call that mansplaining But why? It's just explaining. Where you womansplaining when you first answered the question to your son? Of course not. You were just explaining. If your woman best friend was a car expert and had filled the role of your husband, giving a lengthy explanation, would that be womansplaining? Of course not. It's just explaining. There's zero reason to make a gender neutral concept gendered unless you're trying to praise or put down the subject for gendered reasons. Do…
/r/MensRights09/03/17 09:33 PM
5

I'm trans. Please fuck off with this bullshit.
/r/MensRights07/03/17 06:33 PM
5

Nooooooooooope. This is projection bullshit. If I look at a painting, and want to fuck it, that's on me; not the artist. Different people get off to different things. Some people get off to cars, others find nudity repulsive and can only get aroused to clothed people. It is the viewer, not the art, which transforms art into pornography. And it's on the viewer, not the artist, to have a moral compass when it comes to how they view art and how they view everything else around them. If someone clai…
/r/MensRights07/03/17 02:39 AM
7

Female traffic light signals for Melbourne tackles 'unconscious bias' Feminist narcissism FTFY Feminism has an inferiority complex. I look at a stick figure, I assume it's a neuter. They look at a stick figure, they assume it's a man. The problem isn't with the signs, ladies.
/r/MensRights07/03/17 02:16 AM
2

Literally every single point of their list applies to "Social Justice". Self Awareness: Zero.
/r/MensRights07/03/17 02:06 AM
5

Actually... The reality of the man-hating feminist is the status quo. The legacy perpetuates because it's true. But why do we care about the opinion of a HuffPo affiliate blogger nobody who puts 'mother' in her title line?
/r/MensRights06/03/17 10:55 PM
5

This is some shit tier content.
/r/MensRights06/03/17 10:50 PM
4

Ah, Capitalist spin. It's not that they removed high paying jobs and replaced workers, it's that the jobs "went away". Like the weather! Ha! Nope, no one to blame but the weather; definitely isn't part of some larger economic trend. But hey, that "Men are more desirable when they can be milked" honesty is almost refreshing. Really brings out the everyday sociopath in women. Hey ladies, fuck all that emotional attachment garbage; is your partner economically viable?
/r/MensRights06/03/17 10:46 PM
11

I don't know where your "good friend" lives, but where I live, one of our most populated cities was hit with an attack that demolished a national landmark and claimed 3,000+ lives. And a radical Muslim group claimed responsibility. Perhaps instead of quantity, we should consider quality. How many times you felt threatened is irrelevant. How many times were you actually threatened? Again, I don't know where your friend lives, but the dudes making videos threatening to burn down my country sure as…
/r/MensRights06/03/17 10:10 PM
2

Flip the script. Make the same post with 'Meninist Killjoy' on brass knuckles and you'll immediately have people claiming the image advocates violence against women. You don't get to put your ideology on weapons and then claim it's just a joke. If the punchline is "I hurt people that disagree with me", that's not a joke, that's a psychopath.
/r/MensRights05/03/17 07:25 PM
1

You were labeled a liar because you lied. It's not a matter of dissenting opinion, it's that you blatantly lied about the situation. These "straw-men feminists" which you claim don't really matter because they don't exist/they're so few, and yet on the very same day of your little yarn, we clearly see that major news outlets are running anti-male rhetoric. I have no concerns for the alleged calls of maturity coming from a demonstrated liar, and neither should anyone else.
/r/MensRights05/03/17 07:16 PM
4

Virtue signal elsewhere, poser. The injustices caused by feminism are an inequality men have to overcome. The horrible vitriol radical feminists spread about men are expectations we fight against every goddamn day. Literally on the same day where this article is posted, a mainstream news outlet where a feminist writer is condemning male violence as the worst problem in the world, you're trying to spout this nonsense that "strawman feminists" don't exist?! You're the worst kind of liar. An apolog…
/r/MensRights04/03/17 11:54 PM
10

She's using twitter as her platform to vent, complain and spread hate instead of seeking psychological help like a responsible person should. Arguably the primary function of twitter, really.
/r/MensRights03/03/17 12:28 AM
4

Just an honest question. I am interested in what the view is here. It is not intended to offend. We accept all participants in good faith, lest they prove themselves otherwise. Is it ultimately helpful to say one is antifeminst to promote MRA positions? To be an MRA is to advance Men's Rights. To be a feminist is to advance women's... goals. Feminism has failed to present any legal protections that women lack since their last big victory in the civil rights era. The point of this post is that yo…
/r/MensRights01/03/17 10:29 PM
2

Why then, do human rights according to the activists stop when you are male? Bigotry, not scarcity. but when they find time to criticize men over the 78 other "genders" how is it not an attempt at removal of our basic rights? Criticizing men has nothing to do with other genders. It's straight bigotry. No amount of other people cause you to have less rights by a mathematical quandary, if they deny you rights its because they hate you, not because there's not enough to go around.
/r/MensRights27/02/17 11:05 PM
8

Highly commercialized advertising based click-bait company call them communists nigga, wut?
/r/MensRights27/02/17 06:47 PM
3

takes the focus away from problems that we face Human rights aren't a zero sum game. That's feminist thinking.
/r/MensRights27/02/17 06:45 PM
5

The same reason people used to think blacks were subhuman and jews were scheming gold thieves: Bigoted propaganda. Female supremacy and male disposability hinges solely on the womb. As others have pointed out, the baby making bottleneck is women. Semen is plentiful, wombs are not; so while you need just one working penis to impregnate a thousand women, you still need a thousand wombs to have a thousand babies all cooking at once. In female supremacists' eyes, this makes the womb more valuable th…
/r/MensRights26/02/17 07:34 PM
0

Boy, you're just learning a lot today!
/r/MensRights22/02/17 12:44 AM
5

"Fat acceptance" is stupid. However, anti-discrimination is not. If you treat people as subhuman based on their appearance, you're just as much a bigot as someone discriminating on race or gender. Judge people by their actions, not their biology. Fact is, the US health system has dropped the ball on obesity. They issued a metric which is poorly suited for individuals (BMI), they allowed private industries to supply dietary nutrition guidelines, and the public dialog continues to be "eat right, e…
/r/MensRights21/02/17 09:59 PM
9

Hate to break it to you lad, but this is what the radical feminists have been pushing for all along. You don't have women regretting the birth of their sons and boys excluded from activities in grade school without a deeply ingrained hatred that males are going to be violent, bigoted things by default. If someone tells you it's okay to discriminate against someone because of how they were born, that person is a bigot. Name, shame, and do no further business with them.
/r/MensRights20/02/17 10:43 PM
28

I guess the response to this post just goes to show that people are too stupid to recognize female privilege when they have a literal list staring them in the face of how women have rights men do not. Perhaps the first fight Men's Rights needs to tackle is improving the school system so people have the reading comprehension to understand the world around them.
/r/MensRights19/02/17 08:28 PM
1

I think there's a lot of overlap between MGTOW and MRA, it really boils down to the response. Both communities arose from men being treated badly/unfairly by women. Where they differ, IMO, is that MRAs get mad and want to channel that anger into action for equality. MGTOW, on the other hand, seems very "fuck them, fuck you, fuck everything, I'm OUT". Which is fine. It's your right and personal choice to take your ball(s) and go home, but I think feminism has done a good number on trying to paint…
/r/MensRights16/02/17 11:29 PM
20

Want to show your boss how much you value your job? Don't show up to it! That'll show 'em! And the long, unpaid vacation that follows will be well earned.
/r/MensRights16/02/17 07:08 AM
1

Drafting a bill for congress goes a lot farther than a toothless publicity stunt.
/r/MensRights16/02/17 06:55 AM
3

Marching achieves nothing. Now, if you want to develop a study and a plan to combat these issues that we can present to our representatives, that might actually achieve something!
/r/MensRights16/02/17 06:49 AM
3

You really are just wretchedly dense if you don't understand why you were put down for your astonishingly inappropriate rhetoric. Again, see a doctor. You're unwell.
/r/MensRights15/02/17 03:18 AM
8

Actually no, you're just that repugnant of a human being. Your continued jovial attitude towards death demonstrates that perfectly. Seriously, talk with a doctor about your lack of empathy. It's concerning, and you may be putting the people around you in danger.
/r/MensRights15/02/17 02:39 AM
1

There's nothing academic about bias. Pure bullshit, packed and sold by the dirtiest bullshit miners of our time.
/r/MensRights14/02/17 11:31 PM
8

Maybe if western women were better at research instead of just going with the popular narrative, they would have recognized this before running into it first hand. Shit like this is why I can't take feminists seriously. They literally don't even know what they're supporting; they just do it until it breaks and then complain about it afterwards. Kind of like alimony and child support, actually. Maybe women should stop making major life choices without, y'know, actually thinking about them first.
/r/MensRights14/02/17 11:08 PM
20

Flip the script. 600 women died from lack of care last year, but because 200 men died from the same reasons, we'll be setting up exclusive support just for men. Absolutely unacceptable. When people are dying and only the privledged few are given aid, doesn't that smack of injustice to you? Wake up you fucking sociopath, take the rhetoric out of your maw, and look at this goddamn discrimination. This isn't "but what about", this is people fucking dying and women making it about themselves you mis…
/r/MensRights14/02/17 10:48 PM
25

This will go down as one of the largest medical frauds in history. If there's something I've noticed over the years, it's that pseudo-science usually fizzles out in the collective mind rather than being pointed at as an example for better standards going forward. Look at the cover-up of tobacco harmfulness, and then the virtual repeat of the process with sugar. The fact that these were major industry cover ups that affected the health of millions of people is sort of forgotten, the companies tha…
/r/MensRights13/02/17 10:40 PM
18

How is "The future is female" not supremacist talk? The future is humanity, you narcissistic cunts.
/r/MensRights10/02/17 10:50 PM
1

To be entirely curt: A bunch of basic bitches decided men were responsible for everything bad in their hysterically selfish worlds.
/r/MensRights06/02/17 10:27 PM
7

It was a good video before he got to "the state wants single people to tax them!" idea. For all of his various studies, he seems to have forgotten that happier people are more productive and successful. Since higher earners get taxed more, "the state" should be trying to make people as happy as possible. But in reality, taxes really only make up a very small percentage of your income expenditures. Mr. Watson brushes against it repeatedly, but the reason why women are encouraged to work and be su…
/r/MensRights05/02/17 10:19 PM
6

Information is great. However, the reason ignorance and false narratives exist is because accurate information is no longer reaching the masses. What we need at this point, sadly, is a series of animated shorts in a nice friendly style that informs people about the real history of civil rights. Infographics and articles are swell, but it's not going to cross the stupidity threshold until you provide it in a form where people can just watch and listen and turn their brain off, like the rest of te…
/r/MensRights02/02/17 08:44 PM
1

I'm with you. Most of the time it feels like I'm not taken seriously by doctors unless there's physical evidence of a problem. Suicide seems like a valid option because there just isn't enough help to go around. People can claim it's because "men use more effective methods", but the fact is that men and women use suicide differently. Men don't use it as a cry for help, they've already sought help and no one answered. That's why men die from suicide more. I'm beginning to suspect that no one has …
/r/MensRights02/02/17 08:30 PM
2

The more calm and quiet your government chambers, the less actual governing takes place there. If you don't have fire in your belly when discussing the literal fate of the world, one might suspect it was purchased on the way to the meeting.
/r/MensRights01/02/17 04:09 AM
3

Nope. Regan defunded them in the 1980s. Criminally insane people get locked away (sometimes), but regular insane people are everywhere. And they vote!
/r/MensRights05/01/17 02:40 AM
-1

You know what's embarrassing? Uh, projection and straw men, like you're about to do. Thinking that Gender Studies is actual science. Never have I claimed that, or would I. hint: nearly all behaviour is based on instinct/emotion People have written libraries full of books on how wrong you are. Most behavior is learned, you halfwit. Economics as a field of study didn't exist 400 years ago. Motivation comes from countless things. Sugar and far are craved because of chemical reactions, not instinct.…
/r/MensRights01/01/17 05:08 AM
0

I never said I was smarter than anyone else, nor did I suggest that everyone else was stupid. I said "people", as in many but less than most.
/r/MensRights01/01/17 05:04 AM
1

You just said the people you were responding to were stupid, heavily implying you were the only one here who wasn't. Whoa, shut down the projectors! I never said the people I was responding to where stupid, nor did I imply I was the only person who was smart.
/r/MensRights01/01/17 05:04 AM
-1

You wrote about behaviors, not gender roles. Read a fucking book.
/r/MensRights01/01/17 01:30 AM
-1

Humans are sapient. They are not bound to instincts, and it's embarrassing to imply they are.
/r/MensRights01/01/17 01:30 AM
0

Neither, really. I was just commenting on a comic, and I cared about defending it for a little bit. Now I'm over it. My 'opponents' want to appeal to emotion and analogies by comparing humans to animals, and that's retarded. So I'm done. If I want to change people's minds, I'll write an article about it and present points and counter-points. This is just banter. I'm not going to tailor my language to "serious discussion mode" when I'm being called names and being dismissed without evidence.
/r/MensRights01/01/17 01:29 AM
1

You moved the goal posts every moment you could, and I shut you down at every turn. And what did you give me in return? "Uh, women are unhappy so... cough gender roles are biological". Go fuck yourself you anti-intellectual cretin. Watching kids at the park isn't science, it's a few steps removed from pedophilia. Maybe you have bigger problems that need addressing.
/r/MensRights31/12/16 11:14 PM
2

Oh, The World Economic Forum, American Psychological Association, World Economic Forum, Pew Research Center, a study of neurology and a study of biology are think pieces? Keep on lying, you lying coward. You'll go real far in politics with that kind of yellow bellied deflection.
/r/MensRights31/12/16 11:09 PM
1

TIL 7 citations to your 1 stray dog about unhappy women is "emotional non-argument". You're a liar and a coward.
/r/MensRights31/12/16 11:05 PM
-7

Oh, I see you chose not to respond to where I tore your shit up, but you popped over here to call me an SJW. Nice job.
/r/MensRights31/12/16 11:02 PM
-10

Nothing you said, or linked, has anything to do with gender roles. But thanks for playing.
/r/MensRights31/12/16 10:59 PM
-1

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pWdd6_ZxX8c
/r/MensRights31/12/16 10:54 PM
-1

Nice straw man you've got there, but I'm afraid it's a bit late! This is winter, doncha know. Would you like to point out where I said I was the only smart one? Go on, I'll wait patiently.
/r/MensRights31/12/16 10:53 PM
0

Pff, I wish. Excuse me for having passion about a subject people are rather stupid about.
/r/MensRights31/12/16 10:26 PM
-2

I don't see how that really fits here. It was in response to men staying home with the children as women did other societal tasks. Also these tribes aren't doing very well for themselves. Not at all the point. The argument was whether or not gender roles are biological, and they are not.
/r/MensRights31/12/16 10:23 PM
0

There would be more links to show you, but guess what? Academia is 100% on your side of the debate So, your rebuttal is that because women are unhappy, gender roles must be biological? I'm sorry, but that's some daft bullshit conspiracy theory level stuff. Seriously, you're calling me the climate change denier? If gender roles were a social construct, don't you think there would be modern, highly populated nations where the gender dynamics were flipped on their head? No, because behavior trends …
/r/MensRights31/12/16 10:20 PM
-1

The denial of this is doing a lot of damage to our society Oh, you want to cite that? confusing a lot of people. Morons, maybe. So just stop it. Tell that to the World Health Organization.
/r/MensRights31/12/16 09:23 PM
-7

you dig up one super stretching paper and a Guardian article You mean two academic papers from anthropologists? Yeah, no. This is actual science, and you're the denier here. Defending one post on reddit from someone with an incredibly poor grasp on history isn't worth my time. You don't even want to put in the effort of reading past the abstract. Read more, it would do you a world of good. You people What, an active poster in this sub for over two years, as well as KiA and Egalitarianism? Oh yes…
/r/MensRights31/12/16 09:15 PM
-3

Nice skimming. I linked an article that was easier to digest than the academic paper by the professor who studied the Aka tribe. It seems pretty clear you don't want to change your opinion in light of facts, so have a nice day.
/r/MensRights31/12/16 09:07 PM
-10

Care to name a historical context in which the women hunted Here you go. while the men stayed at home gossiping and raising kids? Yep, it's a social construct.
/r/MensRights31/12/16 08:57 PM
-9

Gender roles are a social construct. This is demonstrated by numerous cultures and thousands of years of human history which assign different tasks to different sexes. These things can change fairly easily. Gender identity is psychological. This is demonstrated across thousands of years of human history where various men portrayed themselves as women and women portrayed themselves as men. This seems 'ingrained', and is similar to sexual orientation; possible to change but difficult/traumatic to …
/r/MensRights31/12/16 08:14 PM
17

The suicide numbers strongly disagree with this conclusion. Men suffer, they just don't talk about it.
/r/MensRights30/12/16 05:21 PM
4

Absolutely nothing but passion and skill. Infer what you will from the barren landscape of social justice gaming. There are, of course, numerous games with female heroes and have been for decades. But because they're 'the wrong kind', you won't hear them praising Samus, Bayonetta, Lara Croft, or Jill Valentine for being hallmarks of gaming.
/r/MensRights24/12/16 11:30 PM
20

If our criminal justice system is unable to punish part of the population because "we can't take them away from their family", then it doesn't work. How can we prevent crimes under threat of punishment if the punishment is a "maybe depending on circumstances"?
/r/MensRights15/12/16 08:51 PM
7

MensLib is nothing more than Feminists poorly wearing MRA blackface. Cultural Imperialism: Infiltrate a community with allegedly good intentions, immediately begin policing any criticism, make new rules for the community, claim the community's support as you repeat the process with another community. Rinse, repeat. This is what they do.
/r/MensRights09/12/16 07:36 AM
3

And wow a cheap article replacing black people with men on one article. It's a good thing you don't know how to read, because you might see that the original creator of that article was literally "everydayfeminism.com" and the word swap was to show how outlandishly bigoted it is. And Karen Straughan just shows what you'd like to ignore that there are women who have always criticized feminism's more extreme fringes. I thought something you could placidly listen to might be more up your alley, but…
/r/MensRights06/12/16 10:59 PM
3

So let's see here: Feminism is based on reason and science Extraordinary claim with zero evidence. MensRights doesn't get bullshit attacks That's why Feminists are shutting down film screenings for a men's rights film, right? You just have a bunch of upset teens here Slanderous assumption. who don't have a clue Slanderous assumption. and have never attempted to learn about feminism at all. Alright, it's time for you to fuck right off. As someone who was raised by a single mother, I fucking bathe…
/r/MensRights06/12/16 09:32 PM
8

it is a response to those who tell women to wear less revealing clothing/carefully moderate alcohol consumption to protect themselves from being raped. Saying teach men not to rape is sort of a half snarky response and shows how the reverse of teach women not to get raped as equally rediculous. Except it's not at all ridiculous to suggest you should moderate your alcohol intake if it leaves you unable to defend yourself. Locking your car doors and hiding your valuables is what police actually su…
/r/MensRights06/12/16 06:11 AM
45

I'm not sure how 'teaching men not to rape' could overcome any of these identified contributory factors. If Modern Feminism was based on reason and science, MensRights might actually be able to do something besides constantly defend itself from bullshit attacks. "Teach men not to rape" is based on a bigoted fallacy that men are effectively dogs, and must be trained how to behave because they have no agency of their own.
/r/MensRights05/12/16 08:50 PM
14

I feel like there isn't enough exploration on number 5. Did anyone think the war on drugs was successful? You know, massive ad campaigns that told people to just 'knock it off'? It seems like if video games can't alter a person's behavior after long term exposure to hours of media, then why on earth would lecturing people to not commit other crimes ever work? Arguably the most atrocious thing about the concept of 'teach men not to rape' is the fact it takes actual resources away from preventativ…
/r/MensRights05/12/16 08:46 PM
2

My post was more of a "this is how it should work" rather than "this is how it does work". I think you should be able to release yourself from all liability if you don't want to be a parent.
/r/MensRights05/12/16 08:13 PM
3

Having never been in this situation, here's my take: Prior to fucking, statements need to be made from both parties about protection. This doesn't need to be a conversation, but both individuals should make one of the following statements: "I'm unprotected." "I need to get protection first" "I'm using (insert method) for protection" If both parties have either disclosed lack of protection, or failed to disclose, you have to assume that a fertile man and fertile woman having vaginal intercourse i…
/r/MensRights05/12/16 09:34 AM
4

It's... something. Unfortunately, it has the same level of awareness that "Do heathens feel pain?" exhibits. Believe it or not, yes! They're people too!
/r/MensRights30/11/16 06:41 AM
5

I agree. Dictating preferences is shitty.
/r/MensRights28/11/16 11:49 PM
12

Call it what it is. Hating someone for a condition they have little to no control over is bigotry. It's fine to have preferences. It's okay to say "I don't want to get involved with you, you're not my type". It's absolutely not okay to mock, tease, and actively prohibit people from public places and services due to your "disgust". That's bigotry.
/r/MensRights28/11/16 09:38 PM
15

The first sentence is really off. I have to disagree. Now, don't get me wrong. I'm not a prideful person. I barely give a shit about my own accomplishments, let alone that of my ancestors. But for some people, cultural identity is important. And Anon is right. White people in America are generally shit upon if they're proud of their heritage. Black folk? Loud and proud. Latino folk? All about heritage. White folk? What are you, a racist? The hysteria of racism and straight up anti-intellectualis…
/r/MensRights28/11/16 04:18 AM
12

You know what? Technology has gotten pretty far. I don't think it's unreasonable that both the accused and accuser are investigated when a police report is filed for a serious crime. We're past the 'paperwork' excuse. If you don't have enough police to effectively enforce the law and protect the people from criminals (and falsifying a police report is a crime!), then hire more. Yes, if police are actually going to catch and prosecute your attacker, you have to submit to questioning, search of th…
/r/MensRights26/11/16 09:34 AM
14

Casual Reminder: Men who treat women the same as they treat other men, without benevolent sexism/female privilege, are seen as overwhelmingly sexist by both men and women.
/r/MensRights26/11/16 09:11 AM
5

Imagine if someone had the gall to make an ad campaign advocating that we had to talk 20 minutes to talk to all women about how to end child abuse. Just the women. Yeeeeeah... Sexism.
/r/MensRights25/11/16 11:53 PM
20

"Fragile Masculinity" is, once again, a clear case of raging projection.
/r/MensRights25/11/16 07:21 PM
4

"Hysterical Delusion Land" Birthplace of most Feminist bullshit, and "Social Justice"
/r/MensRights25/11/16 07:19 PM
3

You seem to have painted "globalism" as some ephemeral boogieman with malevolent intent. It's "Us vs Them" with no distinction of who "they" are or why they're doing it. For fuck sake, why not just call it "the gay agenda" or "lizard people" or "the devil"? You wrote an awful lot to say very little.
/r/MensRights18/11/16 05:08 AM
6

Not great. Every week I seem to have a day or two where I just shut down and try to do something vaguely productive/distracting at home while tears seep out. I really don't know why I go on. Every time I think I might have found some handhold, something to grasp onto that might make things a little easier, it slips away. I don't know if I can pass my classes. I'm so behind. I don't know what I'll be doing come January. Maybe there's no point in returning to school if I can't focus and no one can…
/r/MensRights16/11/16 02:44 AM
8

Mental health care has passed crisis conditions in the West. We are faced with more information, more social interactions, and more productivity than ever before in human history, and despite suicide being the 10th leading cause of death in the US, no one seems to notice or care. I was hospitalized in September for planning to kill myself. They gave me no counseling, no rehabilitation, and no follow up. I've been billed 20,000 dollars for what was essentially a shitty 4 day hotel stay where they…
/r/MensRights15/11/16 10:21 PM
5

"World ends, women most affected" - Media
/r/MensRights15/11/16 08:47 PM
6

Once a gamer, always a gamer. :D
/r/MensRights11/11/16 08:20 AM
4

I'm at University right now (dumb, I know) and predictably everyone is super concerned about sexual assault. Super! Concerned! Posters, awareness training, hotline numbers on every post board! A few months ago, crime statistics for the campus police department came out. Four reported rapes. No charges filed. I mean... Greater than 0 is a bummer, but for a University of over 10k students, a rape crisis of 0.04% isn't really what I'd call... y'know... an "epidemic". I'm certain that there's a team…
/r/MensRights11/11/16 06:51 AM
14

More reasons not to move to Canada!
/r/MensRights11/11/16 06:22 AM
46

I ain't no fancy lawyer... But I'm pretty sure that someone doesn't just sit still compliantly while you're cutting them apart with a circular saw. This suggests that he was probably restrained or incapacitated, at which point she probably could have.. you know, left the house got help? Y'know, instead of FUCKING MURDER?
/r/MensRights11/11/16 06:21 AM
22

The salt must flow! Couldn't ask for a better commentator than the witty Shoe
/r/MensRights10/11/16 10:16 PM
2

The spread of social justice goes hand in hand with the West's pathetic mental healthcare system and rise in anti-intellectualism. Their worldview is so myopic and paranoid that they don't even understand they're wildly over-reacting. If things were as bad as they make believe, society would have already ground to a halt. Their complaints are typically little more than a projection of their fucking psychosis on others.
/r/MensRights10/11/16 06:47 PM
6

Unfortunately yes. Mike has been increasingly irrelevant over the years, so he's hopped on the regressive left bandwagon of feelings over facts.
/r/MensRights03/11/16 06:12 PM
3

I feel like part of the reason is that it is just drilled into you from a very young age that you can't question the "facts" and doing so will result in horrible social isolation. It certainly seems like Americans have been re-trained into not questioning authority. 20-30 years ago, I don't think the country would've just shrugged and accepted that both of the presidential nominees are under investigation for serious crimes, but here we are.
/r/MensRights03/11/16 01:00 AM
8

Hi. Since I was about 10 or 11, I figured I wanted to be female. I never got along with 'the boys'. Sports, sparring, going fast... It just didn't do anything for me. I wanted to draw, and write, and be pretty. But that didn't happen. I remember, the first time I was asked to draw a self portrait in therapy (for childhood depression), I drew an androgynous figure in baggy clothes with a TV head with a question mark on it. From a boy, to an adult, I have never felt like I know who I actually am. …
/r/MensRights03/11/16 12:45 AM
2

He didn't realize how far gone Academia is. I don't think many do.
/r/MensRights31/10/16 01:02 AM
5

I think the 'brand' of Feminism has endured some tarnish over the years, and fewer people are identifying with that label. On the other hand, 'Social Justice' definitely seems to have a stranglehold on many Millennials as a secular dogma which they must adhere to or be branded as heretics.
/r/MensRights30/10/16 11:45 PM
13

There's a reason that a number of liberals are starting to shake off the designation and refer to it as "the regressive left". They abandoned the environment, they abandoned equality, and they abandoned wider social services. The Modern American Left is now little more than the Centrist-Right.
/r/MensRights30/10/16 08:53 PM
7

If World War 2 didn't prove that men are necessary... Fuck, dude. I mean, what we're dealing with is a wide-spread educational issue where people legitimately no longer understand how the world works and why various people have certain roles and what those roles do. That was the kicker about our post-9/11 infrastructure assessment, there's like a handful of power transmission lines that would take the majority of some states down. People don't think about 'the finger on the button' anymore, but …
/r/MensRights30/10/16 06:58 PM
8

Oh no, I agree. The anti-men sentiment was present all the way back in the earliest suffrage movement days. Second-wave feminism was useful, imo, because it was influential in the civil rights era which ultimately benefited much more than just women. But once that fight was over, the leadership dissolved and the crazies inherited a widely known brand. For exactly that reason, I think the best way to handle a social movement is to organize around a single point, laser focus that shit, and once yo…
/r/MensRights30/10/16 05:51 PM
18

It makes sense, doesn't it? I mean, what we have in western society (I say western, but I can really only speak for having lived in the US) is propaganda, plain and simple. Feminism was taken over by radicals, and the fringe lunacy of writers like Dworkin became the mission statement. Literally crazy ideas like an organized conspiracy of men deliberately oppressing women known as 'the patriarchy', the fabrication of 'biological' male flaws such as 'toxic masculinity', and the deliberate downplay…
/r/MensRights30/10/16 05:01 PM
57

As someone actually struggling with severe mental illness and money troubles, you make it sound really easy. :(
/r/MensRights29/10/16 04:33 PM
9

I'm of the opinion that once you've murdered or raped someone, your 'good person' qualifications are forever ruined. Full stop. I believe in punishment and rehabilitation. Five, ten, twenty years from now, maybe you volunteer your time and save people by doing charity work, sure... That makes you better than you were, but you're still not a good person. You don't get to ruin or end a person's life and then get a do over, fuck no. You get second tier rights after you piss on the social contract l…
/r/MensRights28/10/16 08:09 PM
7

She's one of the few people that bring a sense of honor to the designation of "Academic". Someone that's done their homework, read a metric fuckload, and is able to communicate their understanding well to others. Unfortunately, so few academics meet this criteria anymore that it almost feels derogatory categorizing someone as such these days.
/r/MensRights28/10/16 07:46 PM
5

Camille is one of our heroes, IMO: The radically rare rational feminist. Turns out you can support women's rights and advancement without shitting on men or infantilizing women!
/r/MensRights28/10/16 06:31 PM
13

The first step was mandating that you had to hire certain people. The next step is mandating that you have to hire a certain number of those people. Where do you suppose the third step on this slippery slope in progress is?
/r/MensRights28/10/16 05:25 PM
1

Precisely. This level of hysterical delusions shows detachment to reality, not evidence of grand patriarchal conspiracy (which in itself is paranoid).
/r/MensRights28/10/16 01:49 AM
67

The epitome of female privilege is when imaginary problems for your gender are more important than actual problems for others.
/r/MensRights27/10/16 06:37 PM
2

The whole point of muddying language with alternative definitions is to undermine the purpose of the word and make things seem worse than they are. Everything is racist, everything is sexist... Sure, if you redefine those words! Now everyone's a terrible person you can discredit with a single accusation, and the accusation is technically true under the enormous umbrella term you created. When did bumping into someone become "sexual assault" anyway? It's utter madness. The same is true with "male…
/r/MensRights26/10/16 04:13 PM
8

Fun fact about skewed statistics... Less than 4% of America is gay.
/r/MensRights24/10/16 05:54 PM
11

They know that. Same reasoning behind the Patriot Act.
/r/MensRights24/10/16 02:19 AM
8

We're rapidly moving towards a much more automated society, and so far nothing this election has shown even passing awareness of this enormous economic threat looming on the horizon. Much like climate change, I fear this is going to be something that the oligarchy pays no attention to until the poor start dying en masse or it affects them directly.
/r/MensRights23/10/16 10:54 PM
12

Woman offender, young male victim... You know why.
/r/MensRights23/10/16 05:59 PM
10

Feminism seems to be decades of evidence against that claim...
/r/MensRights23/10/16 05:56 PM
56

i totally didn't know subs like KIA existed. is that the biggest sub of that category (MRA + gaming) ? KiA is the GamerGate subreddit. It was originally about exposing the nepotism and concern policing cropping up in games media, but when media deflected the accusations as "misogyny", GG found itself fighting off social justice and radfem loonies. I'm sure some people in KiA would take offense to it being labeled an MRA sub, although it certainly seems like some people have opened up more to the…
/r/MensRights19/10/16 01:35 AM
6

I've just never understood the idea that men in power would be trying to systemically prop-up other men on the basis that they're all males, it just doesn't work that way. Unfortunately, it works exactly that way for a number of women. Yahoo is a shining example of a woman in power channeling her sexism to ensure women get preferential treatment. As is often the case, Feminist's negative view of men is largely a result of projecting the worst qualities of women on to men.
/r/MensRights18/10/16 06:10 PM
16

I want to point out an exception to this, and it's very much what separates the men from the boys. Whether they're 12 or 21, immature boys are prone to talking a ton of shit about each other; but it's typically reserved to competitive environments like school and sports. I think that men are more likely to internalize that sort of thing though, and try to boast themselves up or tear themselves down instead of picking apart other people. I knew a couple of competitive guys that turned into self-p…
/r/MensRights18/10/16 12:47 AM
2

It's been said that conspiracy theories lack credibility because it becomes harder to keep a secret the more people you involve. But what people using that line of reasoning fail to understand, is that when you misinform people, they never know the truth. They have no secrets to keep. They consider themselves in the right, and thus morally validated in their actions. It only takes two or three people to lie in a world where people get their information from twitter. When politicians and schools …
/r/MensRights17/10/16 11:46 PM
12

I was hospitalized three weeks ago for a mental breakdown where I was a risk to myself. I received no counseling. They adjusted my meds, made sure I could eat and clean myself, and sent me on my way. The best thing I got out of it was being informed I could qualify for food stamps and medicaid. Despite reaching out to the financial aid office, student support services, and the student health center with desperate concerns on the financial viability to continuing school and my deteriorating state…
/r/MensRights17/10/16 10:21 PM
60

I think it's pretty clear across media and general social circles that no one hates women more than other women. Nicest women I've ever met have had very few female friends, naturally I asked why. The common response, and I quote "women are catty backstabbing bitches"; it was particularly funny coming from a lesbian. Body shaming? That's a feminine institution. Men don't sit around talking about how women are wearing the wrong clothes and make-up, we don't even do that about other men! "You're f…
/r/MensRights17/10/16 09:46 PM
5

So is my financial aid office hopelessly inept, or discriminating against me? I've made multiple attempts in person and on the phone to get help finding aid and I'm never given any assistance.
/r/MensRights14/10/16 10:13 PM
20

I'm right there with you, buddy. I can barely afford college, and everyone I talk to about it (surprise, every person involved in financial aid is female) doesn't understand how I don't have tons of aid money. No one cares about men in need.
/r/MensRights14/10/16 04:36 PM
4

This is what happens when you inject capitalism into every facet of a society. As soon as research funding became contingent on having studies published, loose journals began publishing any slop that people could slap together in a vaguely scientific methodology. Social sciences were hammered the hardest because social sciences are driven by observable behavior patterns rather than empirical reactions you can reproduce in a lab with specific conditions. Feminism bought its way into academia, bec…
/r/MensRights10/10/16 12:02 AM
7

Shit dude, I think it's past due that we have some sort of mandatory parenting standards. Your children must immunized, your children must engage in some sort of recognized educational program by age X, you must pass a safety and best practices test every two to four years, etc. We have higher standards for car ownership than we do for raising human beings for fuck sake. Make adoption easier by having consistent child wellness standards, make it easier to take children away from bad parents and …
/r/MensRights09/10/16 07:53 PM
12

Women being afraid all of the time isn't a problem society has to concern itself with, because their fear is irrational. Data proves that men are murdered more often than women by 5 to 1. Teach women not to be paranoid lunatics.
/r/MensRights07/10/16 05:06 PM
2

As someone struggling to make ends meet with a pile of unused business/invention ideas in OneNote, shit like this just pisses me off.
/r/MensRights07/10/16 04:52 PM
9

Isn't it super funny how feminists claim there's systemic discrimination against them, and never have any specific examples with follow up? Isn't it weird how there's multiple examples of systemic discrimination of men, caused by feminists in leadership roles? Huh. It's almost like the entire thing is just projection to cover their own wrongdoings.
/r/MensRights07/10/16 04:31 PM
13

Yeah, that's the point. Actual equality gives the same resources to everyone. Feminism wants to argue that equal opportunity is unfair.
/r/MensRights07/10/16 04:56 AM
2

equity sounds more professional. It's just a weasel-word rebranding.
/r/MensRights07/10/16 04:34 AM
22

And the appropriate response to that picture.
/r/MensRights07/10/16 04:33 AM
9

Goddamnit you OC making motherfucker, equality is not the correct label for the right side! It's equity! Don't let those dumb assholes redefine the fucking word! Fix their mistake at least.
/r/MensRights07/10/16 04:32 AM
0

So you agree that politics has nothing to do with it. Gender and wealth are the deciding factors. Funny how OP said nothing about wealth, but decided to lump politics in due to his biases.
/r/MensRights06/10/16 08:57 PM
-2

The point is that people take men to task about their comments far more than women. Coulter has been doing this shit for years, but people would rather dunk on Trump, O Reilly and Limbaugh occasional buffoonery than the non-stop horseshit that comes out of Palin and Coulter. On both sides of the aisle, women get a free pass. Look at the Clinton email scandal. IT guy? Hunt him down, string him up! Debbie Wasserman Schultz violating FEC rules for Clinton? Forgotten about in a week. Bill Clinton me…
/r/MensRights06/10/16 12:34 AM
3

She is a liberal woman. FTFY Ann Coulter and Sarah Palin have said some of the dumbest, inflammatory shit when it comes to politics, and they still get paid handsomely to appear on various programs and sell books. Don't pretend this is a left vs. right issue. This is a Women are Wonderful issue.
/r/MensRights05/10/16 05:34 PM
5

What are you talking about? No one cares about where you got banned from. How is that in any way related to this?
/r/MensRights05/10/16 03:36 AM
6

That just isn't true at all and you know it Ah, so you're a psychic now! This is wonderful, since you don't seem to have any evidence for any of your claims, so we don't have to probe into your mind reading powers either. But hey, here's some actual evidence that you're talking out your ass. A man's top 5 reasons to grow up and get married from Fox News Make no mistake, the US right fucking loves telling people what their gender roles should be, including that men should "man up" in most situati…
/r/MensRights05/10/16 12:07 AM
7

I think people just generally calling leftism a mental disease is being hyperbolic but... Then why bring it up at all? In the context of the post you made, you're suggesting that being abusive to men is somehow tied to "leftism", and that this mentality is a mental illness. Misandry has no political affiliations.
/r/MensRights04/10/16 10:19 PM
14

Sociopathy is a mental illness. "Leftism" is not. There have been, are today, and will be in the future, many people who identify with the progressive ideology of the left without engaging in the current cancer that is identity politics. If you want to enable change, you're better working off with facts than hyperbole. Also, try to think outside of your Americentric box. 'Right' and 'Left' mean entirely different things in different countries. Your argument, as it stands, might as well be painti…
/r/MensRights04/10/16 10:10 PM
6

Yeah, you're just making a statement without backing it up with evidence I think you should rethink your strategy, boss.
/r/MensRights04/10/16 10:07 PM
1

Someone has an inferiority complex and is projecting like a drive-in theater.
/r/MensRights04/10/16 12:51 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter