TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

CommanderOfTheDeath Archive

View 28 posts and 4,693 comments by CommanderOfTheDeath on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
527

CommanderOfTheDeath/r/MGTOW29/05/20 11:47 AM
272

CMVCommanderOfTheDeath/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/20 11:24 PM
93

CommanderOfTheDeath/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/20 10:42 PM
87

Cats are the only pussies I would commit toCommanderOfTheDeath/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/20 08:54 PM
34

CommanderOfTheDeath/r/MGTOW25/01/20 07:53 PM
32

CMVCommanderOfTheDeath/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/20 10:50 AM
25

CMVCommanderOfTheDeath/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/20 12:01 PM
24

Post for ModsCommanderOfTheDeath/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/20 01:52 PM
17

CommanderOfTheDeath/r/MGTOW07/02/20 12:21 AM
16

DiscussionCommanderOfTheDeath/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/20 12:22 PM
13

CommanderOfTheDeath/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/20 10:29 PM
9

BluePill is gayCommanderOfTheDeath/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/20 04:34 PM
5

CMVCommanderOfTheDeath/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/20 10:34 AM
5

Question for QuestionCommanderOfTheDeath/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/20 11:46 AM
5

CMVCommanderOfTheDeath/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/20 08:22 PM
5

Add flairCommanderOfTheDeath/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/20 08:16 PM
5

CommanderOfTheDeath/r/MGTOW17/05/20 10:14 PM
4

CommanderOfTheDeath/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/20 10:48 PM
3

DebateCommanderOfTheDeath/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/20 10:06 PM
3

DiscussionCommanderOfTheDeath/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/20 10:36 PM
3

PurgeCommanderOfTheDeath/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/20 02:35 PM
2

CommanderOfTheDeath/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/20 06:45 PM
1

CommanderOfTheDeath/r/MGTOW06/02/20 11:17 PM
1

DiscussionCommanderOfTheDeath/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/20 10:56 AM
1

CommanderOfTheDeath/r/MGTOW16/01/20 01:56 PM
1

Question For WomenCommanderOfTheDeath/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/20 09:51 PM
1

CommanderOfTheDeath/r/MGTOW02/02/20 07:16 PM
0

Nigger Nigger Nigger Nigger Nigger Nigger Nigger Nigger NiggerCommanderOfTheDeath/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/20 12:17 AM
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 4,693 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
12

That's pretty irrelevant if they are so annoying that they not only psychologically turn you off but literally make you dick get soft physically.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/21 06:14 PM
19

We should learn do deal with annoying chicks? Never. Keep those to yourself, we're happy not dealing with the headache they are.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/21 06:08 PM
2

Target destroyed.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/21 04:10 PM
1

Developing the habit of instantly cleaning the kitchen after cooking (yes instantly, even before you eat) helps a lot with that. Apart from not letting things pile up you also do the dishes while the cooking utensils are still warm and the dirt didn't stick onto their surfaces yet. Makes cleaning them super easy. It literally takes just 30 seconds to clean a pan if you do it instantly. Just put the cooked food into a different container, which is small enough to fit into the dishwasher. That way…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/21 03:29 PM
1

Well what do you mean? It seemed that you are projecting slot of things onto the term "modest" when it just means not dressing sexually revealing.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/21 03:19 PM
2

Well - while I technically - agree with you, the world does not work on "should". It is how it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/21 03:13 PM
1

If you are overthinking a stupid edgy meme, so much that you think it's representative of all women, nobody can help you anymore. Also what do you think that dressing modestly means? Running around in a burka? Lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/21 01:58 PM
1

Uh huh. Until, again, they get the opportunity lol You're going in circles. This is useless.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/21 11:55 AM
1

Step 1.5) do not live with someone who is a pain in the ass because they want cleanroom levels of cleanliness and demand that you adhere to their standard instead of cleaning themselves
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/21 11:54 AM
1

That child was conceived by a male irresponsibly cumming in a vagina. Did you even read my comment. That doesn't matter. It's completely irrelevant how the child was conceived. Women can even commit sperm jacking and it's perfectly legal and they still keep 100% of the reproductive rights. They have the right to cease reproducing at any point prior to the completion of their role in reproduction. Firstly: they really don't. Just look at all those cases where men got raped or spermjacked and stil…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/21 11:52 AM
1

Sluts are by definition women who sleep with a ton of men. Sluts have lower standards than the average woman Have you seen the amount of attention and sexual access women (especially hot ones have) the idea that women have to be undiscriminatory to be able to rack up bodies is not based on reality at all. They can be picky and still easily fuck multiple guys per week. Yes yes until they get propositioned for sex by a hot girl and their "orientation" goes out the window lol Sociosexual orientatio…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/21 04:11 AM
3

Lol at you for shifting the goal post. The topic here are single high earners. They don't have kids. And since they spend 80-100 hours at work, and probably eat out most of the time, they spend very little time at home and therefore the place stays clean and requires just minimal housekeeping. Especially if you have a vacuum robot and maid.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/21 04:02 AM
5

There is a very cheap fix to domestic labor cost: Step 1) buy a Xiaomi Mi Robot Vacuum Mop Pro Step 2) clean up whenever you make something dirty Step 3) profit
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/21 03:53 AM
6

Women: house work is tedious and annoying and exhausting Washing machines, dishwashers, vacuum robots, and a shit ton of other tools: Are we a joke to you?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/21 03:48 AM
2

The men who can get with the sluts do. That's exactly what I said. It's the men who can you are talking about and those are the minority. Sluts don't really get rejected by anyone for sex. They do. Men in relationships and men with restrictive sociosexual orientations exist. Also even sluts don't approach men, so there aren't really a lot of situations were an average dude would even be in the position to reject a slut for sex. Men who can't get the hot sluts settle for the average modest girls.…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/21 03:45 AM
1

Women settle and don't think it's that big of a deal and it doesn't mean they love less and etc and they don't understand why men freak out about it so much. This is a huge lie. Women absolutely love the partners they settle on less. Not only that, they also respect them less and often like after the more attractive bad boys they couldn't get to commit even years AFTER the new relationship started. because when they settle, they don't love their partner or respect them. You are projecting so har…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/21 03:25 AM
1

Being modest ≠ beeing a super boring & passive, non-exciting person. Just because you don't sleep around doesn't mean you can't be a good partner lol. This is utter bullshit.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/21 03:18 AM
3

You can't project the behavior of a small minority of men onto all men no matter how much you women love to do that. Average guys don't "settle" for modest girls, they actually want these women and aren't interested in the sluts that are shared around.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/21 03:17 AM
1

Notice how you didn't address my point at all. Whenever a child is born it is 100% the woman's choice. Hence why only women have reproductive rights and single moms are the only ones to blame for their situation.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/21 03:02 AM
12

Just be patient. It will happen soon enough.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/21 04:57 PM
1

The opposite of monogamy is not polyamory.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/21 04:53 PM
7

Men should protect women because they’re physically stronger If it was about physical strength it wouldn't be a gendered thing. Then people would simply say "people should protect weaker people".
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/21 04:53 PM
25

And want women to have all the freedom with none of the accountability.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/21 04:51 PM
1

How does one force themselves to be attracted to people they aren’t? You can't.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/21 10:09 AM
13

There are simply some good and some bad doctors. It's not a gendered thing.
/r/MGTOW23/05/21 01:50 AM
6

Wow, you’re a misogynist. This term is so overused that it completely lost it's meaning. I say, men have had enough time to lead. Nobody cares what you say. Now it’s time for you to take a backseat and let women be in charge. It’s only fair. I'm not gonna do shit. Any relationship where both parties get what they want is fair. Im bot gonna play woke to win some useless political correctness points. Fuck that. I would never follow a man. Then don't. Problem solved.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/21 05:42 PM
1

There are. Obviously. But what I would rather see are all those positive examples of female leadership.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/21 02:35 PM
2

What do you make of more feminine men being in relationships with more masculine women, where the latter take the lead rather than the former? Idc about what other people do. It might be a minority, but given that there is still a polarity, it seems like an alternative model that would function decently well, if not as good as the traditional one. It doesn't work tho. Masculine women, despite being masculine themselves are not attracted to femininity. They cannot respect feminine men. They want …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/21 01:53 PM
1

Remembers the story about the full-women company which completely broke down because all employees were crying & fighting all the time and not getting shit done. Also remembers the woman who said that female programmers are trash and men are the way better workers. Yeah, no. Just no.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/21 01:46 PM
8

Seems like you think having a penis makes you the “leader,” rather than actually being capable of leading. Yep, whenever I make a decision I just rub my dick three times and then use my unlimited wishes to ask the penis-genie how to decide, I don't use my rational thinking or something, I mean who would ever to that? That's crazy. How many young men today are capable of leading? Men in general? Few. Young men? Even less.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/21 01:15 PM
2

Women are leaders. Being a leader isn't a masculine trait. It inheritedly is. If you look at the personality profiles of CEOs you see that they are all scoring very high on personality traits which are way more common in men (especially at those percentiles). Sometimes men hand over their accountability and ask for someone else to make a decision. Most of the times they do that, it's not simply because they don't want accountability but because they see that someone else is more knowledgeable on…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/21 01:13 PM
5

Ah yes obviously I have to be a super toxic women hating misogynist if I ignore women rambling on about where to eat. That's soooo sexist of me! How dare I?! If you don't think that masculine and feminine roles exist or that they are somehow inheritedly misogynistic you are delusional. I guess you have never seen women handing over their accountability to other people. Sometimes they not just hint but flat out ask for someone else to do the decision. It's funny that you are using the last point …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/21 01:00 PM
2

Do you ever follow her lead? If she has knowledge on a topic I don't, obviously. Let's say for example she works in accounting and tells me "you can do XY and z to improve your finances" I would obviously follow that advice. Why do you get to be the leader? 1) I am the man, so I'm in the masculine role 2) women don't like responsibility and accountability, they actually like being led (if they respect the man can trust him to make decisions which benefit them) If you're the leader, what happens …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/21 12:51 PM
8

Simple: the woman is following your lead, and trusts your judgement, that's it. That doesn't mean that she is your slave who always has to do what she is ordered and can never say her opinion on a topic.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/21 12:45 PM
2

Which would bring us back to point 1: sucking it up and lowering their standards, as women typically prefer men closer to their age.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/21 02:56 AM
4

If everything is discrimination the term looses it's meaning. While theoretically it can be used in that context, it's not generally used that way by the general public, it's only used for immoral cases of 'discrimination', so I imo it doesn't fit here. It just makes the conversation was more complicated because everyone means something else and the semantics divert the attention from what's actually being said.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/21 02:49 AM
3

Well its the same for men. No woman is worthless no matter how old or fat she is. But that doesn't mean, that men have to be sexually attracted to them.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/21 02:25 AM
2

You just prove his point.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/21 02:23 AM
7

Different standards are not discrimination. It's not 'discriminstion' if men don't date old, fat, competitive, ..., women, it's simply lack of attraction. Women aren't entitled to anything, so if they can't find partner for any reason that just means that their market value is too low and they need to suck it up and lower their standards or work on what's making them undesirable (which will be impossible for age obviously).
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/21 02:21 AM
2

Why are you putting all the blame on the women for getting pregnant? Because women have all of the reproductive rights, while men have none at all. Whenever a child is born, the women had 100% authority over that decision and hence also has to carry all the responsibility.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/21 01:34 AM
8

Whoever controls access to sex controls the type of children that are born. Yep. And this also the reason why single moms are criticized but not the deadbeats who knocked them up, because only the women have reproductive power.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/21 06:20 PM
6

How is it a "cope" when I am actually a woman, and I actually know the women that go for those types instead of looking at a distance like most guys here do? Your implying that bad boy ≠ super low value criminal scum which is not the case. Most "bad boys" are simply normal high value guys who don't worship the ground women are walking on and have a steady rotation or regularly fuck new girls. Those guys aren't fucking trailer trash, they are fucking hot chicks from all kinds of social background…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/21 05:31 PM
13

Fuck I nearly got baited again. I was so close to writing a proper answer, but luckily I noticed that it's another Lilith shit post before wasting my time.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/21 02:23 PM
15

Apparently eating and breathing are the only needs humans have.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/21 02:22 PM
1

You cannot be equal and not the same. If you want to play the semantics game do it right. Men and women have equal rights, and the same basic human needs, that's it. They are not equal in any other sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/21 02:22 PM
21

Yeah that guy is delusional if she thinks a drug addict, missing half her teeth is not low value. Some people on here are really batshit crazy.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/21 02:20 PM
1

Fair point
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/21 02:15 PM
24

Knocking up a chick and letting her be a single mother or look for a cuck stepfather doesn't turn the child into an anti-cuck, it turns it into a broken beta bitch.
/r/MGTOW21/05/21 01:31 PM
1

Even if this was true (which it isn't) at the end of a day masculine men have a lot more success with women than feminine men, also they are way more common. There is absolutely no reason for men to not strive to be masculine if they want to get laid. It's the most effective way period.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/21 10:48 AM
5

Not only, but it is a huge motivator. If money wasn't necessary to get women a lot less man would work to get it.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/21 10:44 AM
3

I agree with your point, but this posts is asking to be deleted.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/21 10:40 AM
1

I think there's too much of an association with lack of maturity/masculinity if he's younger. Well that depends on the age. If you are in your 30s the lack of maturity is way less common. If you're 32 and he is 28 that very different than if you are 24 and he is 20.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/21 10:35 AM
1

They still don't reach 40 or 60 working hours
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/21 10:11 AM
1

You answered with "not true" to my comment which said that only simps want masculine wives.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/21 02:30 AM
2

It is true. You are a woman, so you have no idea what men want. If you did, you wouldn't think rediculous stuff like masculine men wanting masculine women. In this scenario simp is used to highlight the absence of a spine and feminine-ness and needyness of those guys.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/21 02:18 AM
6

It means you like feminine or have a weak jawline. Grow a beard.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/21 01:59 AM
11

There was a guy once who lost his house in a divorce but still kept the property it was built on. He gave 1 month notice and then got it demolished.
/r/MGTOW21/05/21 01:55 AM
2

Wjat I really like about this post is the amount of red pills dropped in the comments. Especially the top comment on the first post.
/r/MGTOW21/05/21 01:53 AM
4

It must be hard being you. Only for delusional blue pillers. What with it being illegal to have standards and all. What? by masculine, I mean displaying some behaviours coded masculine. So you mean exactly what it means. Who could have ever guessed that? Sometimes it’s nice to be the little spoon. Only for feminine subs. I wasn't so far off, when I talked about worshipping after all.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/21 01:25 AM
5

Then I wonder why that shaming never works? If all men who aren't attracted to men with boobs are such insecure man-babies, manipulating them into dating undesirable women would be rather uncomplicated, wouldn't it? But yet masculine women seem to not have a lot of success with masculine men, only with feminine simps, which they aren't attracted to - and not shamed for in contrary to men. Woman have standards, that's a given, but if you are a man, don't even dare to think about not dating a woma…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/21 10:27 PM
4

Only simps want masculine wives.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/21 10:13 PM
4

You think that strippers don't let their customers cum on them, suck their dicks and even fuck them?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/21 07:48 PM
6

but she only had 1 SD far as I know. Only 1 that you know of lol. And lol at you not knowing that most strippers also let themselves get fucked by their customers.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/21 07:47 PM
3

Why no cops?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/21 07:45 PM
6

Just cheat and divorce her and take the half her money after you get caught. Easy.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/21 05:45 PM
2

Then the solution is to simply break up and find a partner who is just as much into sex as you.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/21 05:43 PM
0

With just a 14 hour per week "job" there is more than enough time for that.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/21 05:38 PM
2

How is wanting sex a Motive to threaten and punch people? You do realize that the amount of people who exhibit such antisocial behaviours is super low?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/21 12:17 AM
2

So what?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/21 12:13 AM
2

Its not. 99,9% of dudes do not go around punching or threatning people simply because they can. They have no motive or once rive to act antisocial, hence why men don't care. Women are simply super neurotic and are trapped in a victim mentality where they think that all kinds of people want to hurt them.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/21 12:10 AM
1

How does that make it any different. That's completely irrelevant to them being a threat
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/21 11:58 PM
0

There are couples who spend almost no designated time together and are still together. There are exceptions to every rule, but generally no love language is more important than another one. They are all important. You are just projecting your own most important language onto all people.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/21 11:58 PM
1

It's the same for any other of the languages. If you don't feel loved and appreciated because no love languages are statisfied besides the quality time, it will start not feeling like quality time anymore because you will feel rejected/neglected.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/21 11:27 PM
0

Because it's subjective. Just because you don't need gifts doesn't mean that all people don't need gifts.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/21 11:13 PM
25

If he wants to spend money for sex he might as well spend it on different women...
/r/MGTOW19/05/21 11:11 PM
3

Explain HOW you have a good relationship if you don't feel loved and appreciated? It's like asking "would you rather have a brain or a heart"? It makes no sense. Whatever you pick, you will die. Both organs are absolutely necessary. It's the same with relationships, there is not one love language which is better than the others. For a relationship to work all love languages need to be there. Quality time alone is not enough.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/21 11:10 PM
2

If women are threatned for no other reason than "hE iS pHySiCaLlY sTrOnGeR" then they deserve beeinf disregarded. You think men don't deal with other men who are bigger and physically stronger? They do. They just don't bitch and moan about it to garner victim points.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/21 11:05 PM
5

Idc about what they feel, women are neurotic and irrational af. I asked you where that "institutional power" is? Women love to throw around that buzzword, but can never add any substance to it. It doesn't exist. That word is just used to push the 'men bad, wahmen gud" victim narrative.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/21 10:34 PM
3

Ah yes, the "institutional racism" argument. Please explain to me how an average men can harness "institutional power" to threaten women? I would love to be able to use some of those historical powers men seemingly have. I just got my 2000 bucks gender pay gap cheque from the patriarchy bank yesterday, now I just need some sexism to complete the package. Please suggest a good tutorial. Video essay is preferred, but a written step-by-step instruction would also be okay.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/21 10:27 PM
3

the women were arguing that "mancave" was a sexist word Lol, that's the most retarded thing I heard today, thanks for sharing.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/21 10:19 PM
6

I disagree. If your thought is "genocide is good," to use an extreme example, I don't care how "casual" your conversation is, you should never fucking say that. Yes you should. No matter how "bad" (that's completely subjective) your opinion is you should always be able to express it. Freedom of speech is one of the most important rights of all. And for it to work everyone needs to have it, not just those who are saying things you are agreeing with. Silencing people for their opinion - even if th…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/21 10:17 PM
17

This is not to mention that talking to others about your sex partners is a violation of trust. Women talk about their sexual partners way more often than men. And not only that they also talk about a lot more details.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/21 10:08 PM
6

Then follow your username and start asking out guys instead of being the passive sexual object that is approached by men.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/21 07:38 PM
2

I just want sex, hence I don't pay ≠ I pay, now she owes me sex
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/21 07:29 PM
5

You are making it out as if almost every person would be slaying pussy/riding dick left n' right but the reality is that that's the minority - despite being painted as the majority in this, and similar subs. Most people are not very sexually uninhibited. Sexual inhibition just makes the filtering process more complicated, but not impossible. If you look long enough (and your market value and expectations align obviously) you will find a compatible partner after some time. But yeah if you do not …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/21 11:14 PM
2

No? Men are entitled to not date anyone they don't want to date. This differs a lot from your initial statement which said "mEn BaD rEEEE".
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/21 10:52 PM
13

It doesn't matter if they can physically transfer the bitcoins, if they find proof that he owns them he will be forced to do it himself. You cannot hide money in a divorce no matter how. You will be fucked over if you try. The only way is if there are literally 0 connections between you and the wallet which I doubt because the guy was stupid enough to brag about them.
/r/MGTOW18/05/21 10:39 PM
3

I know. But it's mostly the other way around anyways. So many people just can't handle if you don't drink and say stupid shit like "just try one sip" but you get used to it lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/21 10:34 PM
2

Men hate doing things to be a good person and then they turn around and shit on women for wanting a "good man" because while they will make fun of you for trying to be good, they assume THEY are good without doing anything. I don't and it's not. I just had to reply to this bullshit comment of yours, Men hate doing things to be a good person and then they turn around and shit on women for wanting a "good man" because while they will make fun of you for trying to be good, they assume THEY are good…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/21 10:31 PM
1

Laughs in not having a drivers license.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/21 10:29 PM
1

If you date someone that is trying to force you not to eat meat, eat it in front of them and laugh maniacally like the übermensch you are. Nehme meine Aufwertung.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/21 10:27 PM
1

Just buy the XXXXXXXXL pack and use coupons. You should be able to get 6000 calories for the same price as 2000 that way.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/21 10:25 PM
1

No, men just hate annoying extremists of all kinds, be it veganism, leftism, astrology, etc. There are normal vegans but there are just too many crazy vegans who are a huge pain in the rectum, because they simply can't shut the fuck up and are downright religiously praying about veganism all day everyday and annoying all the people around them.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/21 10:23 PM
2

They can not only be considered a part of lifestyle, they are a huge part of lifestyle.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/21 10:19 PM
1

Non-drinker who's happy to be the DD without fuss? Great. DD?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/21 10:18 PM
15

You got a typo there; it's adult software running on a vm running on outdated children's software running on children's hardware.
/r/TheRedPill18/05/21 10:16 PM
2

Men don't court women they only want to fuck. They simply pick easy women. If a man is actually seriously dating many women it's because he is waiting to disqualify them based on their actions and will pick the one who is most compatible. If all were good and compatible courting wouldn't even be required.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/21 10:09 PM
24

I really don't get that one. Even in my blue pill days I knew that just standing around somewhere waiting for a chick to come back is retarded as fucc.
/r/TheRedPill18/05/21 05:21 PM
1

You would have to send those articles for me to believe it, because if it's a man they always call it rape.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/21 04:36 PM
6

Ah, so you're saying men should put in more work, to get less attractive, lower quality partners instead of going for more attractive, and generally better women who are younger. And this gents is why you never take dating "advice" from wahmen. Ever.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/21 12:00 PM
10

It is true, women don't give a fuck about little boys beeing raped. The articles reporting on these incidents often don't even call it what it is - rape - and instead say shit like "had an affair/relationship/whatever bullshit" and these rapists often also get very light sentences or sometimes even just a slap on the wrist.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/21 11:57 AM
7

And accountability is inevitable, etc. etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/21 11:53 AM
5

Its not an assumption it's proven. Apart from tons of articles of woke women admitting that they don't find their "perfect" husband's attractive and they cheat in them regularly there are also studies which show that the more housework a man does in a marriage, the less sex he has.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/21 11:35 AM
2

That's exactly what I mean when I say "do something casual".
/r/MGTOW18/05/21 11:28 AM
3

It amazes me how men are always finding new ways to blame women for their actions instead of taking responsibility! How can men be responsible for women's behavior? It's completely on them and the spineless simps who enable them by worshipping the ground they are walking on as if it was their religion.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/21 12:23 AM
5

TIL that someone who freely chooses to have sex with a person is a slave 🤡🌍
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/21 12:14 AM
0

Most women are trash, hence why men have to date (not court) a lot of women. If the quality of women was better we wouldn't need to go through huge piles of trash before finding one which is less useless than the average.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/21 12:13 AM
24

10 bucks?? What's in your coffee? Gold?
/r/MGTOW17/05/21 07:20 PM
1

We already established that a great personality cannot trigger sexual attraction if the looks aren't attractive. It is not the first thing. It's the most thing, the order doesn't matter. The idiot here ain't me.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/21 05:25 PM
1

That doesn't conflict with the fact, that looks are the most important thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/21 05:14 PM
226

This is why you never take women to dinner on the first date. Always do something casual and cheap so that you can check wether she is an entitled brat before wasting your money on her.
/r/MGTOW17/05/21 03:34 PM
1

Men value women based on appearance. Shocking! Who would have ever guessed that?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/21 03:32 PM
2

I didn't say all as in 100%, I said almost all. Read my comments again.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/21 11:27 AM
3

User Experience (in Software)
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/21 10:13 AM
2

To show you that your comment is wrong and looks indeed do make up almost all there is to make sexual attraction.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/21 10:09 AM
5

Nobody is talking about abuse here. And claiming that all age gap relationships contain abuse is disingenuous.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/21 10:08 AM
2

Show me where all those great single moms are who went out if their way to make sure that their partner was the right one and their future kid would have a good environment and "it just didn't work out".
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/21 03:15 AM
8

And you're completely incapable of making any decisions before your brain is 100% done?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/21 03:13 AM
9

You gotta love people living in abundance arguing that scarcity is no big deal. 🤡🌍
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/21 03:11 AM
3

A hot woman beeing a bitch can make your dick soft, but an ugly woman beeing wasn't and nice will never make it hard.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/21 02:34 AM
4

Beeing turned off by bad behaviour doesn't change the fact that looks make up for almost all there is to make sexual attraction.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/21 02:18 AM
10

Why? How did you get those numbers? Why not 29 and 26? Or 31 and 24? Or 21 and 25? Anyone can make up some arbitrary numbers and say people shouldn't do x,y and z, but at the end of the day every adult is free to do whatever the fuck they want.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/21 01:53 AM
20

Aren't women strong and independent and can make their own decisions and more mature than men at the same age? How come there is always some arbitrary number for age gaps and whenever it's time for women to be accountable for their actions they turn into those little innocent creatures with no agency? Grown women aren't children, they are free to choose how they date.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/21 01:46 AM
1

You keep hamstering around. Reality is not subjective. There are no different interpretations. There are more women than men who would date someone with a high n-count. That's it. There is nothing to interpret there.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/21 12:16 AM
1

Again, there is no "my", or "your" reality. There is only reality. And in reality women have way less objections about dating men with high n-counts than the other way around.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/21 12:06 AM
1

It's not. For men it's basically the same, but not for women. They care about more than just looks.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/21 11:55 PM
3

Your argument does not support your point tho. OLD is only about looks, but there are more ways for men to be attractive, than just looks, hence why OLD does not paint an accurate picture of a man's attractiveness. Most, if not all men can get way better women in real life than on Tinder.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/21 11:53 PM
1

So there are moral things you think of as disgusting? Its neither moral nor immoral. It doesn't affect anyone else how could morality even be applied there? I care about people fucking around in their free time just as much as I care about people eating avocadoes - not at all. You're talking about men's opinions. Yes it's reality that those are men's opinions? It's not an opinion that women take less issue with a high n-count and cheating, it's a fact. But that's not the woman's reality. There i…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/21 11:51 PM
1

why you would judge a neutral behavior as moral for one gender and immoral for another. I didnt say it was moral or immoral, I simply said that it's disgusting. Yeah, if you're just talking about Some Guys opinion, sure, think whatever you want to. I am talking about observable reality. Women have way less problems with partners with high n-count and cheating that the other way around, it's not just "some guys opinion".
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/21 11:08 PM
1

I wouldn't encourage it as it can also have negative effects for men, but yeah it's mostly fine. Yes it is a double standard. So what? Men and women aren't the same. They are way less women which feel visceral disgust when dealing with a high-n man and even a lot of women which find it attractive. The opposite is not the case tho.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/21 10:29 PM
9

There are actually plenty of women who tolerate cheating as long as the guy has a very high value. Happens all the time in couples where the man is very rich or famous.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/21 10:27 PM
2

No, it's disgusting that women want to be ran through.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/21 10:25 PM
0

Congratulations, you just played yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/21 10:22 PM
3

More than half (don't know the exact number) of the pregnancies in the US are unplanned and the number of unwed mothers having children keeps rising indicating that women decide to have children before setting up a commuted relationship with a stable environment. Add to that the growing number of very young mothers who don't have any kind of serious relationship with the father when they get pregnant.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/21 10:20 PM
1

Having a job doesn't mean you can't be a leader lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/21 10:17 PM
1

If they want to be respected by other men (and women) they absoluty do. And it's not gross at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/21 10:16 PM
5

Most of those pregnancies are not planned. They stem from stupidity, irresponsibility or desperation (to have a child) or a combination of all of those things. If these men didn't even plan on having kids than they are absolutely unfit father's. You cannot be a good parent if you didn't decide you wanted to be one and prepar for it in the first place.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/21 10:15 PM
-1

Yes it can. But that's not a good argument. The "you can do everything right and still fail, so just do it wrong from the start" defeatism fucks up a lot of people who regret it afterwards. In most cases when women end up single mothers they didn't do what you described. If you look at women who actually do those things - vet properly, wait long enough, establish a stable environment - have a way lower chance to end up as single moms.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/21 10:08 PM
2

Beeing in a relationship and having a child with an unfitting father are two very different things.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/21 10:05 PM
6

Apart from religious people being a huge pain in the butt, many of those "church girls" are huge sluts. If people are operated all their childhood they become rebellious and do what they weren't allowed to do. What aleks you think that this doesn't apply to church sluts?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/21 04:00 PM
8

Just say no and ignore the topic.
/r/MGTOW15/05/21 11:57 PM
-1

If you think going a few days without getting your dick vacuumed qualifies as a dry spell you are pussy whipped.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/21 02:52 AM
9

Because it works.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/21 02:49 AM
1

Don't own stupidly expensive shit, don't waste your money on the woman & exhibit lots of alpha traits and you will be fine.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/21 02:47 AM
2

Step 1: live in a country where whoring is legal Step 2: do not waste your time on whores Step 3: pump n' dump tinder sluts instead Step 4: Profit
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/21 02:45 AM
2

The man is not "leading" with his wallet. But a woman is going to notice whether her dates are at a fast casual restaurant or an upscale fancy sit down restaurant. This is exactly the point. You cannot attract women through money without being seen as a betabux. You should never even talk about it. What you can do however is attracting women with your lifestyle. If you have nice clothes, a good car, a great apartment, go to expensive restaurants, fancy vacations etc. a woman will pick up on that…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/21 02:32 AM
1

That's stupid. For that money you can get professional whores who fuck way batter than insta thots.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/21 02:28 AM
90

Does equality mean infantilising and making excuses for women when they engage in misconduct? You have summed up modern day feminism perfectly.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/21 10:31 PM
8

Prenups can get thrown out. She could claim that she was forced to signed. Therefore it is very important to make sure that there is no pressure at all. Do not plan the marriage at all, don't even pick a date, before the prenup is signed and make sure that both parties are represented by a lawyer and that the process is recorded and both lawyers ask their clients wether they understand what they are signing and they both confirm it verbally before signing.
/r/Divorce_Men14/05/21 09:30 PM
1

😂
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/21 09:25 PM
4

You talked about friends - which is not the topic at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/21 07:48 PM
3

Did you have fun shifting the goalpost?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/21 07:28 PM
20

He should have respondent with "you're not my girl then" and not responded anymore
/r/MGTOW14/05/21 06:51 PM
10

No.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/21 04:09 PM
7

They will be unhappy either way. But picking a beta sucker to pay the bills atleast has the financial advantage. Also these women can (and often will) simply cheat with the dead end guys they were fucking in their prime.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/21 10:24 AM
1

They aren't to blame more than the perpetrators but that doesn't mean that they aren't to blame at all which is what many people keep saying. Obviously you can never completely prevent bad behaviour as you can't look into people's head so you never really know 100% who they are. But you can greatly minimize the risk by picking properly.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/21 10:23 AM
4

Masculine All men are made, not born. To say "just be masculine, and reject the femininity" makes no sense as men need masculinity to become masculine. Without father's or role models in their life and only surrounded by women and feminized propaganda there is jo way for them to turn out masculine.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/21 04:29 AM
2

That marriage has the potential to be harmful is enough to make it a bad idea. It doesn't matter what kind of woman the guy licks as he cannot predict the future and hence is never safe. If a contract entail giving a loaded gun to the party it is a shitty contract. If marriage was a real business contract (as in between to business partners) it wouldn't exist. There is not a single contract similar to marriage. Nowhere. Because everyone who is in business recognizes a shitty contract from 100 mi…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/21 06:33 PM
1

They can't. It's an automatic reaction. If a man sees a half baked women IRL or on a picture he will automatically objectify her.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/21 06:04 PM
1

If you run around in super revealing clothing or post nude pics on only fans you do.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/21 05:59 PM
1

No one has to consent to being objectified. There is no consent. Objectification happens in the mind.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/21 05:55 PM
1

It's not, but whenever you hear someone complain about objectification most likely than not it's a woman, not a man.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/21 05:47 PM
2

Women objectify themselves "Themselves" is the keyword. Nothing else matters. They are doing it to themselves, it doesn't matter that they do it because it works, that's very stupid reasoning, obviously something would have to work for people to do it, else they wouldn't do it in the first place.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/21 05:30 PM
2

If no one paid them or rewarded them with attention/favors, women would only objectify themselves for sex. I don't get what this is supposed to mean. I can only tell that you're trying to deflect accountability.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/21 05:25 PM
2

You would. Prostitution is literally the oldest profession in the world. That sexualization and objectification is a male thing is utter bs. Women are sex object and they know it. They use it to their advantage but then cry "dOnT oBjEcTiFy Me" when it's convenient for them.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/21 05:21 PM
1

They need to be big and round and soft.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/21 02:48 PM
4

Obviously.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/21 01:36 AM
11

They don't see who is liking or commenting. They only see the like and the comment. To them attention is like a drug, they don't even think about where it's coming from.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/21 01:34 AM
1

I wouldn't say majority but probably a huge chuck like 1/4 or 1/3 (especially if you count the softcore porn a lot of girls post on their Instagram).
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/21 12:48 AM
13

Do they really value the 'validation' of internet perverts so much as to degrade themselves seeking it? Yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/21 12:47 AM
4

Ah yes, every man who makes the rational choice to sustain attraction and respect in his relationship obviously is proud and arrogant and has a huge ego and what not, right? Nothing is every women's fault either right? It can't be that they are simply not attracted to vulnerability, I mean that would mean that they are responsible for men not being vulnerable and how are you supposed to blame men then? 🤡🌍 I don't feel shamed. Shaming language only works if the other person doesn't recognize it a…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/21 10:46 PM
5

Its not about beeing taken advantage of. Obviously that can still happen, especially with bipolar or narcissistic women but even if you have a great caring women she most likely than not will still loose respect and attraction for you. There simply is no reason to risk reducing the two most important ingredients which are holding your relationship together for an abysmal chance that she will not be turned off for "emotional labor" which won't really help you emotionally. One question: are shamin…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/21 10:31 PM
8

Bruh there have been multiple studies and surgery where women shamelessly admitted that they use dating apps (and social media) for attention and validation and 30% of women have used a man just for food atleast once.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/21 10:13 PM
9

This is bullshit. You didn't answer my point at all. It's very easy: if you want to be vulnerable as a man you do that with your friends or your therapist, not with your woman, because in 95% in the cases she will respect you less and not even be able to help you with your problrms. That's it. Edit: btw it's funny how women always circlejerk about "insecurity" or "ego" or any other crap when it's literally simply a rational decision. Women react negatively to vulnerability despite their convince…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/21 10:08 PM
5

1) depends on the quantity & quality 2) the milk is not just sex
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/21 10:02 PM
1

Thx
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/21 10:01 PM
3

Women would never fight for anarchism. They are way to fragile to live in a world without a stable political system and since these days most of them want to be "independent" (aka. dependant from the a welfare state rather then men) they would never voluntarily live in anarchy. Women are the born communists. Just that they don't want everyone to be equally poor, they want others to be poor, so that they can be wealthy. You can observe that with all those UMC women who were to stupid to pick a pr…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/21 09:56 PM
1

Can you share the link of that article?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/21 09:51 PM
13

Attractive enough to garner free attention and foodie calls from them. Fixed the typo for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/21 09:50 PM
12

It's not about strength or weakness. It's about intelligence. If men observe time and time again that women react negatively to vulnerability they would be flat out restarted if they would participate in the woman's cognitive dissonance. Everyone woman which claims to like vulnerability either wants to control men, is lying, or doesn't know what she wants.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/21 09:49 PM
4

...you can get the spoiled milk for free.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/21 09:45 PM
11

Isn't it funny how easily (some) women objectify themselves when trying to prove some bs point of theirs?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/21 09:43 PM
1

And how much if that is caused by the woman choosing a bad partner? It needs to be corrected for that first before it becomes relevant.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/21 05:42 PM
2

Thr median average is the average of a data set. It's only relevant if you are comparing data sets, which is not what is don't here, hence why the mean average needs to be used. If you seriously think saying that in the example which has been posted above, that men on average have 1 sexual partners because one guy has 1 partner and the other 9 have none, then I would really worry about your mental capabilities.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/21 05:40 PM
5

Bow you're intentionally beeing intellectually dishonest. "The easiest way to lie is true statistics." This quite is true more than ever. There are two different ways to measure things. The measurement has to fit the thing that is beeing measured else it becomes irrelevant to the discussion. Saying "I value data" and repeating the same non-fitting measurement does not change the fact that it's not suited for the specific situation as it paints a wrong picture.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/21 05:36 PM
5

Then those averages are not suited to measure how much sex men and women are having.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/21 05:26 PM
12

Astrology is not psychology at all. It's utter bullshit. There are no archetypes because the claims have to be super general so that they can fit anyone so that dumb people read them and think "oh that's me" and believe it. Anyone who believes that the position of stars (which is even completely misrepresented as the signs aren't visible for a month each, but have varying lengths and there are 13 not 12) affects their personality cannot be saved. That's flat earther level. The rational thinking …
/r/MGTOW10/05/21 01:12 AM
1

No, you're not insulting me at all. It's all just my imagination. Calling out your post for being bullshit and insulting you are two different things. I guess you take everything personal and therefore can't see the difference. You guys often say that sexual revolution, feminism and all related stuff was a tragedy Those "you guys" who are idolizing 1950s marriages are tradcucks which are slowly going extinct. Young people are learning red pill principles through the internet and those haven't be…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/21 04:20 PM
2

What manipulation? There are women who don't want to be with men who disrespect them so much that it's okay for them to make their woman a whore. So not wanting to sign a very risky and non-beneficial contract equals to not respecting your woman and thinking she is a whore? This comment is great. You just posted the perfect example of how women manipulate men into doing things they don't want. And not only that, in the same breath you also showcased gaslighting and - even more hilarious - sex-sh…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/21 03:42 PM
3

Woman - claims something she can't back up Man - you have no proof for that claim while mine is statistically proven Woman - deflects and repeats exactly the same unproven claim 🤡🤡🤡 Why am I wasting my time?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/21 03:30 PM
1

Nah. Most pumpers and dumpers want to put in the least effort as possible. They are not interested in providing everything for a woman. That's what tradcucks do. I don't know where you get the idea that most red pillers would want that, but it's not the case.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/21 03:29 PM
0

You fell victim to selective reading. From a strictly biological POV Read that sentence again. Twice. This women are also accomplished artists, musicians, scientists, writers, actresses, doctors, therapists, poets has absolutely nothing to do with biological value.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/21 03:10 PM
0

You know what's funny. I always thought it's men who are "lied to" when it comes to sexual and romantic relationships. But the reality is women are just as clueless about male nature as men are about female nature. Anyone who seriously thinks that the unconscious triggers which are responsible for sexual attraction are based on anything else but getting two animals to mate and create offspring is living in some disney parallel reality fantasy world.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/21 03:04 PM
1

There you have it. The biggest part of the manosphere is pumping and dumping TeRPers who couldn't give less fucks about what women they are not interested in are doing with their lives.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/21 03:02 PM
5

Its a statistical fact. It's not a statistical fact the "men fuck up" tho. That's just a claim that a lot of women pull out of their asses to shift blame to the men and deflect personal accountability.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/21 03:00 PM
-2

So the only value of women is to be sex dolls and vessels for babies? Yes. From a strictly biological POV women's only value to men is sex & procreation. Is that news to you? Most women with kids work full time in addition to doing most of the childcare. Most men with kids work full time in addition to doing most of the overtime.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/21 02:57 PM
2

I've also never heard them acknowledge the existence of dancing circus bears -- they are both equally irrelevant to the conversation. Women love to do this. The complain about men not talking about something that is utterly irrelevant to them and take it as proof that these men disagree with that irrelevant something that they don't care about.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/21 02:52 PM
2

The manosphere consists of a shit ton of different men with different goals and motivations. You are projecting the views of tradcucks onto the whole manosphere. Since red pilled knowledge spread like wildfire through YT, TikTok, IG, etc. most manospherians are young and the older tradcucks obsessing about 1950s msrriages make up less than ever.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/21 02:48 PM
3

So what? They're still not getting laid.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/21 02:46 PM
2

Ah, so calling out a stupid post = insulting the person, yeah right, great logic. according to you No. According to logic. no decent woman would stick to such man as his forever girlfriend You would be surprised at how much women put up with if they respect and love a guy. All the bs talk they keep parroting to their friends flies out the window when they meet a guy they really want. And should they have an issue with it, you just let them go. Just to get this straight: your argument is: men sho…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/21 02:39 PM
10

To be fair if he wanted to go 50/50 he would have needed to adjust the living expenses to her income. You can't expect someone who makes way less than you to pay exactly as much as you. Look for a cheaper apartment or pay more. Posts like these really don't make a lot of sense. What's the point of picking a scenario which is obviously wrong regardless of the gender aspect? Why don't you share some of the really sexist posts which are posted on relstionshit_advice and AITA regularly.
/r/MGTOW09/05/21 02:23 PM
2

There is an error in your calculations somewhere. You ended up with 95% instead of 100%.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/21 02:15 PM
5

It's not a gendered thing. Extroverted people simply don't spend a lot of time with super introverted people and vice versa which is why they rarely meet each other and also aren't interested in each other. Introverted people (of both genders) aren't invisible to extroverted people, they are simply not intetested in them. Why would they? Their personalities are not compatible.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/21 02:14 PM
5

Let's assume for one second that this bullshit post was right. So what? Marriage is still a stupid choice for men. Especially if they will be blamed for getting divorce raped by an AWALT afterwards. /thread
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/21 02:12 PM
2

that divorce is most of the time men's fault. -80% of divorces initiated by women -women most affected You can't make this shit up
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/21 02:07 PM
1

But there are women, who hate such activities, are introverted and feel the best at home. Who gives a fuck? That doesn't matter to men at all. Oh there is a super small group of women which wouldn't divorce rape me I guess I will just go and sign a completely useless and dangerous contract🤡🤡🤡 Personally, I absolutely hate clubbing. I cannot fathom how can anyone enjoy "dancing" two steps forward, two steps backward, drink overpriced drinks and call it fun. Something something I'm not like the ot…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/21 02:06 PM
4

Average girls have multiple orbiters sliding into their dms or dating apps all the time. Even flat out ugly women get attention and dates on dating apps.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/21 02:03 PM
8

You don't get it. People aren't entitled to anything. Nobody cares about your "demand" wether it's big or not. If you can't find what you want your market value simply is too low.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/21 01:57 PM
1

I don't think that's the right mentality to enter a marriage with. No. Not thinking that it's the right mentality is not the right mentality. Sorry not sorry but all people who say that preparing for the worst is bad because that means you are thinking that the worst will happen are absolutely dumb. People like that always have worse outcomes in life than the people who prepare. And the most ironic thing is that they feel good about not preparing 🤡
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/21 01:35 PM
1

You really need to learn how to read. I never said that men are using you for sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/21 01:30 PM
10

Money has nothing to do with how you feel. There were a lot of people who were filthy rich and still committed suicide.
/r/MGTOW09/05/21 01:29 PM
1

And I never claimed you did. Basic reading capabilities seem to be an issue for you...
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/21 01:20 PM
2

Tattoos don't require constant work to last for a lifetime, they just do, so they do not show any positive ability at all. I don't care wether chicks like that get married or not. They can do whatever they want, it's their life. I am not interested in dysfunctional relationships so I stay clear of them. It's really that easy.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/21 04:04 PM
1

Did you even read what I said? There doesn't need to be a direct cause. Idk about causation. Very high correlation is enough for me to want to stay clear. I will make it very easy for you: If I have an 80% chance to end up with a sour grape if a pick one which is purple but only a 10% chance if I pick a green one, I will always pick a green grape even if being purple was not what made the purple grapes sour.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/21 04:02 PM
1

I never made a moral judgement. I simply said that tattoos can be used to determine someone's character. Which is 100% true. One needs to have certain personality traits to get a tattoo. You calling it an "excuse" doesn't make it any less true.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/21 03:30 PM
1

So what? Who cares about causation? Wether mental problems cause tattoos and sexually unrestrictive behaviour or the other way around is completely irrelevant. At the end of the day the result is exactly the same. Women with tattoos are very likely to have mental issues and be very sexually unrestrictive. I mentioned the adverse consequences multiple times. And even if there weren't any I still wouldn't want a partner with that lifestyle. I want a partner with a compatible lifestyle. It's as eas…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/21 03:04 PM
1

It doesn't have to do with attraction. I find some kinds of tattoos attractive, hit still wouldn't date a woman with tattoos long term. Tattoos can be used to judge character like anything else which has a very high correlation to a personality trait. You can also judge character by the clothes someone is wearing, their body language, their physical shape, their possessions, etc. Talking to a person is not the only way to judge their character. In fact it's the worst way as people can just claim…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/21 02:47 PM
2

What does this have to do with tattoos? You keep posting completely irrelevant comments which have absolutely nothing to do with the actual topic.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/21 02:39 PM
1

Yes everyone has different standards for the opposite gender. Men and women are attracted different thing. If you're fine playing androgynous fine, have fun doing that, but that's not what most people want to do. And it doesn't make them morally worse or less successful than you. Bering attracted to different things and getting for character are two completely different things which are not linked to each other. Just because someone wants trait XYZ I their partner doesn't mean that they can also…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/21 02:37 PM
1

Ah yes. The "let me make a stupid generalization and then deflect when I get called out on it by talking about myself". I don't care what you do. Your argument made no sense and I showed you why. And btw beeing in a relationship does not automatically prevent a woman from being used for sex - just as it doesn't prevent men from being used for money - there are plenty of men who only enter relationships because of the sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/21 02:27 PM
2

There are exceptions to every rule. Just cuz you know some doesn't mean it's wrong. Generally women who have multiple visible tattoos are not conservative at all and often also have mental issues. Obviously there will be exceptions but the general rule still holds true.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/21 02:21 PM
1

You didn't answer my point at all. You completely ignored it and your reply was completely irrelevant.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/21 02:16 PM
1

Lol at you thinking tattoos have nothing to do with character. They are the easiest way to judge wether a woman is easy. If a woman has multiple visible tattoos, especially if they are big that screams "I will do anal and swallow your load on the first date".
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/21 02:09 PM
5

Lol. You're so called "double standards" (btw they aren't, you're misusing the word) and "morals" do not influence dating success at all. That you think people who have different standards for the other gender couldn't be successful is hilarious. It's how it works. Everyone does that. Men and women want different things. If a woman has no problem dating a tatted up guy who fucked a lot of other chicks that's on her not on him. He didn't influence her decision, it was completely free.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/21 02:08 PM
6

Now you're shifting the goalpost. How I define submission is completely different to my point. It was just used in my example. You completely ignored my actual point. Just goes to show that you're not arguing in good faith. If you want to discuss submission you can do that in another post, or after you respond to my actual point.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/21 03:05 AM
1

Warning: dumb rant detected ... logic not found ... Initiating response protocol... UNO REVERSE CARD Let me apply the same logic you just used: **can't argue that men are using you as a fleshlight if you only care about their money. You act like their looks isn't something they intentionally leverage to get money. Y'all actually love that looks are an option**
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/21 02:58 AM
12

The crucial thing is, as I’ve said elsewhere here, we don’t want men begrudgingly doing things to please us or doing things to please us to get something in return. The FDS definition of a HVM is a man who enjoys pleasing his partner for its own sake. Now you are just dodging the definition. If you apply the same logic to men the outcome is exactly the same. Men don't want women bedrigingly doing things to please them so that they can get something in return. They don't want women faking submiss…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/21 12:15 AM
1

It's not about money tho. As I said men don't care about money. It's about the divorce laws. If they were different the money aso CT would be completely irrelevant. Why would I leave women alone just because I don't want to marry lol? That's stupid. Relationships and no strings attached sex exists.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/21 10:50 PM
5

Jist watch Kevin Samuels on YouTube. It's always funny when he asks below average, overweight women who want Top 1% guys what they bring to the table and the first thing they say is "I'm independent and financially stable" 😂 🤡
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/21 07:58 PM
8

Women are the one who value financial stability a lot, not men. As you said yourself, most men wouldn't have any problem with dating a Starbucks barista. The opposite tho, that's a completely different story.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/21 07:56 PM
2

Fair point.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/21 08:59 AM
0

I think I know which post you are talking about. Just because someone is an EC doesn't mean that he is the leader of the red pill ideology and everything he says applies to everyone. Especially not since these days a lot of red pillers find out about it from YouTube, TikTok, Instagram, etc. and not the sub. There's definitely a significant amount of hateful and or misogynistic men who follow red pill principles but there is also all kinds of other men (even religious ones). That opinion does not…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/21 03:20 AM
0

There have been a gazillion posts about the bad boy topic on this sub already.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/21 05:42 PM
0

There have been a gazillion posts about the bad boy topic on this sub already.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/21 05:42 PM
0

Those stories are super rare. There are way more stories about women passing over good guys in favor of bad boys. Way way more.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/21 03:05 PM
1

I just don't understand when people focus on the labels people out on themselves more than on the stuff which is actually being said.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/21 03:04 PM
10

It's not just one story, there are many stories like that.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/21 02:58 PM
2

So let me get this straight. Men are supposed to ignore a partners ex history when it happens to be positive for the women (i.e. she's was slut "settling" for him) but supposed to care so much when it is bad for the women? Destruction 100
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/21 02:45 PM
1

I'm blue pilled af and even I agree with this tbh. What does that have to do with anything? The commenters talking points weren't related to RP at all. Is anything which doesn't cater to women's every whims considered red pilled these days or what? Do you normally just ignore and disagree with comments simply because the commenter has a red pill flair?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/21 02:42 PM
10

He may be exaggerating a little bit but that's not trolling. There was a guy once who got between a guy and his gf and got shot and killed and afterwards the gf stayed with her bf and sided with him even tho he literally murdered someone else infront of her eyes.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/21 02:17 PM
2

Add a /s
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/21 09:08 PM
8

Women are the gatekeepers of sex, not commitment.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/21 08:54 PM
35

That's what I thought to. This is very common. Women use men to put them through college or pay their debt and then dump them once they get a good job.
/r/MGTOW04/05/21 08:52 PM
1

Attractive guys are rarely shy because of the social proof they get from a young age.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/21 10:44 PM
3

There is a huge difference between suggesting an unfitting job and a job which is completely useless as it's not a real job. There is a lot of stuff between cs and gender studies which could have been suggested.
/r/MGTOW03/05/21 03:00 PM
0

It's not about beeing good advice. It simply highlights why women are not as successful as men. They can't be as they do not possess the same qualities, which are needed for success.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/21 02:47 PM
2

I never said if is different for men. You are the one who brought in gender by talking about women specifically.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/21 05:18 PM
1

It's not. Not even in porn.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/21 04:58 PM
2

I didn't say I don't see ugly or average people. What I am saying is they are ugly, most of the times it's their weight. I do notice them all the time and I never said most people weren't average. How couldn't they, that's literally what average means.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/21 04:57 PM
2

Just lol at that. Reality backs up my claim. Look around you. How many slim women who are very ugly do you see? They are super rare.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/21 04:50 PM
1

This is not really related to my comment but I will still answer it: Because it is true in 90% of the cases. Most fatties have average or even above average faces. So loosing weight will make them way more desirable. Obviously an ugly face cannot be compensated by even a slim body, but noone is saying that.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/21 04:44 PM
1

Well it seems that most guys would rather be single even if they can't get flings than be a cuck.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/21 03:46 PM
1

Well it seems that most guys would rather be single even if they can't get flings than be a cuck.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/21 03:46 PM
1

Doesn't change anything about the fact that western countries are below replacement levels.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/21 02:15 PM
5

Why even be married at that point? Just stay single and get your action from flings.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/21 01:22 PM
1

Who cares?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/21 12:20 PM
2

No amount of ads for fat people can change biology. Overweight & obese people are disgusting (sexually) and Boone who was other options would pick them. Fat people should date or her fat people. Problem solved.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/21 12:20 PM
2

Who gives a fuck if fat girls complain? They should stop studding their face with cake if they want tall guys.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/21 12:16 PM
1

Oh, you know two exceptions? Wow that's so cool. I'm definetly gonna get married now.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/21 12:15 PM
1

Not that's not at all what I said. I said it is useless if you enter a situation where you would need it before you have like your ex did. Him maybe beeing married to you in the future was worthless in the moment she he was leaving his stuff at your apartment. Also you didn't answer my second and way more important question.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/21 12:12 PM
1

I am saying that "advice" like that is not advice, it's useless. People will still stay fat no matter how often people tell them to just work out.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/21 12:10 PM
1

"Just work out." Wow, you just singlehandedly solved the obesity crisis. Good job.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/21 03:36 AM
13

I didn't talk about red flags, I talked about unreasonable expectations and specifically mentioned that those don't affect the relationship statisfaction and you just shifted the goalpost to red flags, which were never the topic. That's annoying.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/21 03:34 AM
1

Why do they need to lock down a mate in this day and age? I'm not talking about their day and age, I am talking about women biological imperative. You said a woman having a kid would be a positive, which is simply not truey it's the biggest negative of ally even worse than extreme weight. they're much further along in fulfilling their biological purpose than half of this sub. They may have reproduced but failed in locking down a provider to make sure that their offspring will be well off - which…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/21 01:38 AM
29

Checking off a laundry list of expectations is not what makes you happy. Most of the things people are looking for are very shallow and do not affect relationship statisfaction at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/21 01:34 AM
1

There are over 7+ billion people in the world already and that human population will continue to raise. Yes it will. In asian and African countries. And even there it will reach a stop one day. In western countries it's different tho, we already reached that point. The population will slowly decrease every year. That's what "the birth rate is below replacement levels" means.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/21 01:28 AM
7

You can't blame horny people for going for who's gonna be easy. Yes you can. That's how personal accountability works. Else everyone could do anything. "You can't blame broke people for killing people while drunk driving as that's cheaper than getting an uber." "You can't blame horny men for raping women as that's easier than self-improving." "You can't blame irresponsible men for abandoning pregnant women as that's now convenient." Do you see now how stupid that logic, nah that's not logic, it'…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/21 01:20 AM
1

If divorce is so fair then I really wonder why every single lawyer, financial advisor and divorced person you ask always tells you to never get married. I guess all of those people have just heard about bad stuff which definitly never happens in divorce right? All the people having to go to the family court every month are super happy people just enjoying their time and would recommend divorce to anyone who would ask about it right?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/21 01:10 AM
1

If divorce is so fair then I really wonder why every single lawyer, financial advisor and divorced person you ask always tells you to never get married. I guess all of those people have just heard about bad stuff which definitly never happens in divorce right? All the people having to go to the family court every month are super happy people just enjoying their time and would recommend divorce to anyone who would ask about it right?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/21 01:10 AM
2

They don't want to deal with single moms. If they are very low value and have no other way to procreate but to take one another man's sperm, some of them will do it, but many will simply decide to not have kids at all. It's almost impossible to suppress the visceral disgust men feel for providing for single moms.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/21 12:58 AM
3

I'm saying it's not illogical conclusion based on how mating operates in mammals or humans It is illogical. A single mother is a failed woman. A woman's only biological job is to lock down a mate who will provide for her and her offspring. Every woman which has a kid but no man failed to accomplish that either because she is bad at picking a mate, because she prioritized genes over provision or because the has some other flaws which drove her mate away. All of those are enormous red flags for an…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/21 12:56 AM
1

The state has an interest in ensuring that neither party is left destitute if possible. Judging by the amount of men who get fucked over and loose their home and have to live in shitty apartments after the divorce this is simply bullshit. one party says gives up more than half their share in order to be able to walk away, or out of guilt, or defeatedness, or whatever, then that is their business. Ah yes. Of course men are just giving up their hard earned assets voluntarily all the time. Yeah rig…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/21 12:48 AM
1

You didn't answer my question. Do you think the marriage and divorce laws are good the way they are right now?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/21 12:17 AM
5

There is no such thing as a "proven female". Men do not care about social proof. That's a women thing. They follow the opinion other women on their partner. Men don't do that. No man would ever consider a single momma who a good option unless he is a needy sucker.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/21 09:20 PM
130

No amount of body positivity will ever change anything for non-attractive people. There, fixed it for you. It won't really help women either. You think men will start hunting landwhales simply because they have seen them on some cringy body positivity ad? Nothing will change. Generally only unattractive men without options chase fat girls.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/21 09:17 PM
1

Legal rights are useless if you go into situation where you need them before you have them. He bought stuff and left it outside of his control before he was married. Also there are other ways to secure your stuff with less disadvantages. Btw it seems that you have no idea what my opinion is.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/21 07:44 PM
1

Well then he was simply stupid. He bought stuff together with you, without disconnecting it properly and left it at a place where he had absolutely no control over it. Not beeing married was not his problem, beeing a stupid idiot was.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/21 07:09 PM
1

You said he barely even lived there. If that was true, why would he have furniture there? Makes absolutely no sense. Either you overexaggerating the him not living there part or he was dumb af.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/21 06:02 PM
1

Well you didn't "take everything" from him then. You took nothing. If he was paying rent and officially living there it would have been different, but that's not what was happening, so what's your point?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/21 05:39 PM
1

If his name was on the lease or he lived there for more than 30 days, then changing locks would be illegal, he could have gotten the cops & courts involved if he wanted to.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/21 05:27 PM
1

I'm not a rehabilitation center Based.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/21 05:21 PM
1

"flick it...", never heard that expression before.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/21 05:17 PM
3

💯
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/21 05:13 PM
13

Just lol at this hamstering. Generally young hot women are the most fertile. You knowing some chick which has issues does not change the statistics. Also men don't want to deal with single moms under any circumstances. Even if the pipe dream of fertility in older women you're talking about was true, most men would still rather deal with a woman which is no kids even if she was less fertile, which is not the case anyways.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/21 05:01 PM
1

Whatever the probability, why take the risk if there is a less risky way? It just makes no sense. Another question: do you think that marriage and divorce laws are good the way they are right now?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/21 04:57 PM
1

everything depends on the individuals involved And since you can't open up other people's head and look inside you nerve really know how they are. Especially not in situations you have never seen. Therefore you cannot count on that. Very bad idea. What you are proposing is to remove the legal benefits that are arrogated to marriage and making everybody go through attorneys to set things up privately. No, that's the workaround. What I am proposing is that the disadvantages get thrown out and marr…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/21 04:38 PM
1

You assume that people live together, even without marriage, for decades Even with marriage very few relationships last for decades these days. do not co-mingle funds or make joint purchases? I they do it right there will be a paper trail proving that both partners contributed financially to those purchases and no one could claim dope ownership on them. Do you actually understand how marriage creates the private equivalent of a business entity in order to ease things like taxes There is only a r…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/21 04:22 PM
1

There would be no way to take everything as everyone would have ownership of their own things. Also there would be no alimony payments.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/21 04:09 PM
1

It does, but the monetary value of the things is not the main motivator. As you highlighted in your comment, most of the times it's simply emotional.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/21 03:43 PM
1

The I want to take everything has nothing to do with the property itself in most cases. It's simply a weapon used by people who are emotional and want to attack their former partner.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/21 03:36 PM
1

Whenever divorces get really nasty it's always due to a "I'm gonna take EVERYTHING from him" mentality. If there is no legal frame allowing everything to be taken people will try it at lesser rates. And even if they didn't, a legal dispute between unmarried people will always be more fair and shorter than any divorce, so it's better anyways.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/21 03:02 PM
1

Because unmarried people tend to keep their assets more sperated than married people, even if they are living together for a long time and also there is no hope of gaining any significant financial advantage as everything will be split up equally and there is no alimony, so fighting over stuff won't be really worth it. What's the point of fighting about something instead of simply splitting it up if it will be slit up in the end anyways?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/21 02:52 PM
1

Idk, but probably there will be less disputes than divorces and they will be handled way more fairly and there would be no vaginamony.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/21 01:49 PM
2

It doesn't, unless someone sues, which is very rare. Even disputes settled by lawyers are rare. In most cases people just take their stuff, split up the joint stuff and that's it.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/21 01:15 PM
1

Cuz that's divorce, that's not the same. You always hear horror Stories about men getting ass raped through divorce, but you never hear the same about cohabitating non-married people. The "worst" thing which happened in my country is that a man had to pay a woman 80000 after the relationship ended to compensate the renovations and upgrades she had done to the house which was in his name only. That's nothing like divorce. That's something which actually makes sense, a fair decision. If it was a d…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/21 12:56 PM
1

If all of that stuff has been bought through the joint account, which is in both names and both names are on the contract and all receipts have been kept, there is a huge paper trail proving that both people put money in. Alternatively they could just both pay for such stuff from their personal account to be even safer and use the shared account only for rent, groceries, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/21 12:47 PM
2

Who's talking about marriage? All I'm saying is if you have an account, car, house, whatever, which is in your name the other person cannot claim to not know you and that the asset is not yours.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/21 12:39 PM
9

Then this OP is worthless, as the headline is the most important thing. Many people don't read the post body at all and even if they did, they'd still think you are mainly talking about assholes not manipulative people specifically.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/21 12:38 PM
2

I can just say I don’t know him, he has no claim on any of these assets. You can't claim to not know someone whose name is on the contract.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/21 12:34 PM
2

Nope it's not. It's two people claiming ownership of stuff and lawyers having to figure out who owns it, which is not that hard if all receipts were kept (which is super easy now that today nearly everything is bought online). A divorce would be a court stealing money and stuff from the person earning more and handing it over to the other one for no reason and then adding alimony to that.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/21 12:32 PM
2

Then you get lawyers to settle the dispute. That will still be way cheaper than all the money you would loose should you have been dumb enough to marry.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/21 12:27 PM
2

The only thing which needs to be added is to create accounts where both people have 50% of the power instead of 100%. So that one person can't empty out the whole account during the breakup and instead can only take out half and the other person can keep the other half. There are already laws dealing with joint properties. If both names are on the house both people own it.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/21 12:24 PM
1

It is that easy if you don't marry. Have sperate accounts, keep all receipts, optionally you can make a shared account. That's it. As everyone still legally possessed everything that's theirs noone can steal the other person's stuff.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/21 12:11 PM
1

Easy, eevryone keeps their own money & stuff and what has been bought together gets split up. It's not that hard, is it?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/21 11:55 AM
14

Your OP made a claim about assholes, not abusive people. Those are two different groups.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/21 11:50 AM
3

We need an "all of the above" option.
/r/MGTOW30/04/21 11:34 PM
3

Am I the only one who is super triggered by the RTL layout?
/r/MGTOW30/04/21 10:46 PM
1

Lol. You posted bs and framed it in a way which was not true, then claimed it was true and a statistical fact and now after getting called out on it your cop out is "you're angry teehee".
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/21 08:03 PM
1

You posted that link to my comment where I said that there are no tangible benefits. That means you are implying that men making more is a tangible benefit which comes from marriage, hence you are implying causation. If you post bullshit acknowledge it and don't try to hamster around afterwards when you get called out.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/21 07:36 PM
14

Starting a relationship with traditional courting while expecting equality (I'm talking to you FDS). A man who uses money to lure you in a relationship won't see you as an equal. If you want equality then you need to accept that you won't be treated as a princess. Yep, there is an interesting study on this, which shows that the reason many women are unhappy in their marriage is because they expect a modern marriage after a traditional dating/courting/relationship phase. Women really are that del…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/21 07:34 PM
10

You just repeated exactly the same shifting of goalposts even after getting called out on it. You can't make this shit up. This gentlemen and gentlemen is exactly the reason why you never take women's opinions on dating seriously.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/21 07:27 PM
1

Improvement has no end.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/21 07:03 PM
2

It's an oversimplification. Wether people take it as it's meant or take it literally as AWALT thinking that all women are the same and like that, it fulfills it's purpose either way: stopping men from pedestalizing women.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/21 11:56 AM
1

You can't make this shit people. People really be picking articles with headlines that push their agenda without even reading a single sentence... The data does “not imply that being married increases a man’s wage,” Guillaume Vandenbroucke, author of the report, notes. “It might be that men with higher wages are more likely to marry; therefore, the average married man earns a higher wage than the average single man.” Women want men with resources, hence a man who earns more/has more earning pote…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/21 11:43 AM
8

Tinder is not really a place where devout catholics go lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/21 10:30 PM
1

The blue pilled ones would get mad, but in most cases stay with her anyways and the red pilled ones know the game already. Women are attracted to success, that's a known fact, getting mad about that would be stupid. Some men even leverage that purposefully to get with a very attractive woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/21 10:28 PM
0

Just because a guy starts out a relationship because if a scarcity mindset doesn't mean he can't catch feelings afterwards. In fact this happens a shit ton of times.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/21 10:04 PM
1

Most promiscuous men settle down with promiscuous women.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/21 10:03 PM
1

TRP is not the brother of FDS. Also TRP has no endgame. I don't get why so many people don't understand that. TRP is only about improving yourself and getting laid. That's it.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/21 09:56 PM
2

TRP is not the brother of FDS. Also TRP doesn't talk about the endgame because it has no endgame. I don't get why so many people don't understand that. TRP is only about improving yourself, understanding female nature and getting laid. That's it.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/21 09:56 PM
4

Men don't care about salaries tho. Instead of limiting their dating pool like that they could strive for a solution which is way easier: don't marry.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/21 09:54 PM
2

Because of the disadvantages. And even if (very big IF) there were no disadvantages; not having a reason not to do something is not a reason to do it.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/21 09:53 PM
8

This. There are no tangible benefits. /thread
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/21 09:48 PM
1

Be single then 🤷‍♂️
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/21 06:16 PM
1

Many of those don't even want to settle down at all
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/21 06:15 PM
1

Well people who have an aversion to sexuality or are asexual are very rare.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/21 04:39 PM
1

They dislike them for commitment, but there are very few who wouldn't fuck them.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/21 04:11 PM
-1

Breaking up over something you have read on the internet is a very dumb move. This is not r/relationshit_advice. You should really evaluate your boyfriend in real life first before making your decision. If you then come to the conclusion that he is with you because of scarcity then you can go ahead. Just know, that unless you are way hotter than the women around you it will be very hard to find a man who has a lot of options but would still choose to pick just one woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/21 03:41 PM
3

I think there is a misunderstanding here. I am not saying that it's not what women want, I am saying that there are almost no men like that in real life apart from very religious ones maybe.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/21 03:38 PM
2

You have to ask yourself/the women who want men that.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/21 03:34 PM
3

Excuse me, did you just assume my gender?!
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/21 03:34 PM
25

You found a hot guy in tinder who told you he only slept with 2 girls and you believed him?...
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/21 03:09 PM
3

You ladies really do not possess any sense of logic. Options, no matter how bad are always better than no options at all. Only a delusional person would think otherwise.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/21 02:45 PM
1

It also sucks for many men. They don't have any options, not even bad ones.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/21 02:37 PM
3

Studies show, that the cheating rates are very similar for both men & women, but I guess that it's more significant for very attractive people who have a lot of options
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/21 02:34 PM
2

Summed up perfectly.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/21 02:13 PM
8

Your comment implies that women weren't doing the same which not true. You don't have to accept anything, you can just stay single.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/21 02:10 PM
2

Where are all those young, high value, commitment-minded guys then? You rarely see them and they are not on the market for long, so good luck finding such men interested in LTRs/marriage before 30.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/21 02:08 PM
6

When it comes to sex, yes, generally, no.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/21 02:07 PM
7

Everyone wants their cake and eat it too and sell it too and bake a new one too and eat and sell that one too. That's how people are.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/21 02:06 PM
3

Most men enter relationships because that's the only way they can get consistent sex. Those men who can get it without relationships simply don't enter them.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/21 01:47 PM
7

The only thing he will get from 'playing the field' is meaningless sex with Well that's exactly what he wants. We don't want guys like that anyway. Wether you like it or not, most guys who are as OP described fall in that category.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/21 01:46 PM
28

the most attractive men are the ones who have the ability to be sluts, and choose not to. That sounds good on paper, but it's not representative of reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/21 01:44 PM
1

Cast a wide net and be patient. It won't be easy to find a commitment minded man at that age, especially if he has a lot of options.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/21 01:43 PM
6

The problem is guys are hornier so there are less men who have option and don't exercise them than women.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/21 01:42 PM
3

Good men don't argue that they're good, why would they, if they really are good, they don't need to say it.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/21 03:28 AM
10

It already is like that. Plenty of men are spinning plates. It always was like this and will always be. There is no reason for it to be socially accepted as men generally don't want to have multiple official girlfriends, just multiple sexual partners.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/21 02:36 AM
1

But even that isn't guaranteed to improve your sexual marketplace value because women are increasingly are out-earning men each passing decade. This is because most women will probably have earned the same amount or more. Well that doesn't matter because men can simply date younger women who not only make less money, but also are more attractive, so that's a bonus.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/21 02:33 AM
10

Only about 10% of people earn six figures and less than 1% earn 7 figures. Even figuring in the differences in living expenses from different places it's still a lot of money (excluding super expensive cities like New York).
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/21 02:30 AM
1

Think what? There is all kinds of things which are said here by all kinds of peoples. There is not one universal 'PPD opinion'. You have to specify what exactly you are talking about.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/21 02:17 AM
1

That's true to some extent, but you always have to take everything what is said around here (or anywhere) with an appropriate amount of very grainy salt.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/21 01:59 AM
1

Nah I'm simply not a native speaker and hence don't know all kinds of expressions.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/21 01:58 AM
5

Yeah, because some retard$ discuxxing soxial dynamixx on re🅱️🅱️it are definitely representative of the hole sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/21 01:47 AM
1

Where does that come from? I have never heard someone refer to lying as "cappin'" before like idk 1-2 weeks ago.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/21 01:44 AM
13

You don't see good men because you pick bad ones and the good ones don't even register as an option for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/21 01:35 AM
9

I would like to believe they realise that. They don't. The amount of women who are delusional and think they can get a HVM at 35 years old with a masculine personality and average or below average body is crazy.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/21 04:13 PM
1

So either way a woman's leaving you I suppose. It's a loose loose situation for men! Did you even read my comment. The first thing I said is that men can date women who make less then them as long as the difference is not too big. How is that a loose loose situation? Because obviously all women care about is money. Not all, but it is a very big factor. And well since in today's society women can make it themselves what do they really need men for? Ask the older women who are complaining that the…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/21 01:17 PM
7

it's a bad idea to date a woman that makes less money than you do Depends on the circumstance. If make 1,000,000 per year and she makes 50,000 yeah bad idea. If you make 200,000 and she makes 100,000 no problem there. it's a bad idea to date a woman that makes more money than you Because she will not respect you, not follow your masculine less, simply be a headache and inevitably loose attraction and leave. Also most very successful women have masculine personalities which is very unattractive t…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/21 12:47 PM
10

That doesn't matter to the end outcome. You not thinking of them as a potential match does not mean that they really aren't a potential match. They are, you simply don't like it.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/21 12:30 PM
6

And for plain johns that reality is even worse because more often than not they don't have anyone in their pool. And you think they have it better lol. Smh
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/21 12:28 PM
2

That's always a bad idea.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/21 12:12 PM
11

No, women always want more, no matter how much they make.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/21 12:06 PM
0

Wow, wow, slow don't. Please don't post so many arguments at once! /s
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/21 12:04 PM
1

It’s just that you have obese women with no actual curve calling themselves curvy now and it ruins all meaning. Yep, this is why curvy & fat means the same these days.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/21 11:26 PM
1

I'm still just confused about why you are having an issue with this. There are different words for murder (first degree, manslaughter, etc) depending on the circumstances. It seems normal to have different words for different kinds of rapes. Especially distinguishing stranger rape from domestic violence and violent rape from non-violent rape. At some point it is too much. Especially if women keep creating new forms. Why can't they just stick to one? If they say rape it's clear what is meant. No,…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/21 11:22 PM
1

Drugging someone isn't rape? Another typo, the "not" shouldn't be there. I meant to say that it is violent & rape and it's stupid to create a new term when the old one 'rape' already includes it. Why are you so angry people make a distinction between violent and non-violent rape? See above. I mean I said "i will not have sex with you" and then he stuck his dick inside me. It was 100% clear to him that I was not consenting. He didn't GAF. That definetly sounds rapey. Did he use force to prevent y…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/21 08:59 PM
1

Date rape is when your date rapes you and it is usually not-violent. That's why it has it's own name to distinguish it from a violent stranger attack. Date rape is usually the result of drugging or intimidating the woman into saying yes, or stealthing or something. The fuck? What kind of stupid crap is that? Drugging someone, taking of the condom or threatening them is not violent & rape. I don't get why it's called "date rape". That's a completely useless term. I am telling you some men are get…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/21 08:32 PM
1

What do you mean? Its rape, if one party does not consent. It's really that simple. You don't think it's useful to distinguish between violent rape and date rape? Again, what the fuck is "date rape"? Of course. I would NEVER have guessed otherwise. Never. Well then why did you bring it up in the first place? Is that your word for rape???? **Autocorrection entered the chat.*** I guess you have never typed on a smartphone before. The 99% of men who aren't raping women benefit because women are afr…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/21 07:16 PM
1

Thats definetly too fat. I wouldn't call them ugly, they definitely aren't, but they're just too fat for my personal taste.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/21 06:55 PM
2

Why isn't your question "how many different forms of rape are men perpetrating against women? Because there aren't many d.ifferent forms of rape. Men are OBSESSED with this. That's why there's a sub about it full of rabid men. First of all it's a very small minority of men. And they are either angry or just laughing about it. They don't care that these women are lonely and won't do anything to help them. No. Men benefit from the way it is right now. They have no incentive for things to change fo…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/21 06:12 PM
2

Not really. You could say it also generally makes looking at your partner more pleasant even if you're not having sex in that moment, but that's it.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/21 03:46 PM
2

No. Physical appearance is not valuable on its own merits. It always has to be combined with other qualities. Nobody would eat the same exact meal everyday for the rest of their lives. But that's not really comparable 1:1. Sex is not only about physical attraction but also about emotions. There is no such influence with food.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/21 01:49 PM
3

Imagine you go to a restaurant and the food there is good enough but not very great. It's still good enough to cure your hunger, but not enough to make you want to go there again and again and again. While if your going to a really great restaurant with superb food you will keep going back there and not get tired of the food. It's as easy as that. Why would I go back/stay with less attractive chicks if they are readily available and there are better looking ones? Sex is a need. You have it, then…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/21 12:59 PM
2

See what you guys don't understand is that it's not a popular narrative, it's a dick narrative. My sick like it that's what I do it, not because of the bullshit like "bEaUtY sTaNdArDs".
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/21 12:38 PM
4

Stop answering women are privileged with oH I DoNt LiKe ThAt as if that would change anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/21 12:36 PM
3

You're talking to me, not to all men of PPD at once, so keep that incel shit, to when you are talking to the incest.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/21 12:33 PM
2

As long as it doesn't burn down while your in it where's the problem?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/21 12:29 PM
3

Amd how is that a reason to not want it anyways? And while a wow factor isn't there, the hotness is still there. And that's the important thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/21 12:28 PM
5

Curvy and overweight? Curvy and overweight are two words for the same thing. No matter the weight distribution & body shape with that weight at that height she is definitely too fat. I mean, just look at her arms and legs...
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/21 12:26 PM
4

So what? That doesn't change that it is how it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/21 12:22 PM
2

All of us get less physically attractive, but not for all of us is the the most important factor for sexual attractiveness.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/21 12:21 PM
2

Ots not just military draft. Young men can be forced to do any labor which is essential (like fire fighting). Recently it happened in a small city in Germany were there weren't enough fire fighters.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/21 12:10 PM
1

True.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/21 11:55 AM
2

Your moral failing is your responsibility. Well, I don't see any problem with my morals, so there's no failure. If you don't have a problem with men lying to women for sex Why would I? Women also lie all the time. It's fair game. women will find another way to protect themselves. Good, let them solve their issues themselves as the strong & independent women that they are. If you don't think date rape is wrong, What the fuck is "date rape"? How many different forms of rape are there for you women…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/21 04:59 AM
3

That's what happens if people go overboard and make things rediculous, or overuse them. It's not surprising that noone takes them seriously anymore. And no, rape should not be less evil, as it's a very evil thing to do. What people need to do instead is to use proper terms and not misuse terms which already have a meaning, to make things which are not that bad sound very bad. If you feel neglected go find a different partner instead of calling it rape. Same for money. If your guy doesn't want to…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/21 04:16 AM
3

You were saying that's why rape by deception isn't wrong, because men do it and nothing happens. Nope, I said it's not rape, that's why it isn't wrong, and that nothing happens. An "and" doesn't imply causation. It's not even that people don't get convicted, they don't even get sued because no judge would accept that crap as it's rediculous.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/21 04:05 AM
2

You're saying rape by deception can't be illegal because it would be hard to prove. No, I never said that. Nice strawman. why that's different from actual already illegal rape Because already illegal rape is real rape, it takes away consent from the woman. "Rape" by deception doesn't. It's a completely rediculous concept. You seem to really not be able to grasp that.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/21 03:59 AM
3

I'm not saying it shouldn't. Because it isn't. And it's not rape. That's just as rediculous as "neglect rape", "mansplaining", "financial abuse" and all the other crap some super woke women come up with.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/21 03:46 AM
3

I know that, but that's not the topic we're talking about. That's literally sex without consent while in our example there is normal consent given, you're just trying to hamster around to make it look like it isn't consent.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/21 03:40 AM
3

I already explained multiple times that that's not rape. No need to resort to ad hominems.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/21 03:36 AM
3

Well, I don't care, I know the laws. Guys lie about their jobs & income all the time and nothing happens. So you're free to disagree, but it doesn't change reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/21 03:30 AM
4

I already agreed with you, that I should have worded it differently and not generalized that much. That doesn't change anything tho. My initial point still holds true. Claiming to be in a job you're not in, or exaggerating your position is not illegal and not rape and will not get you into any problems.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/21 03:08 AM
1

He just said that the number is way too high. I don't get how someone could make the connection to weed from that.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/21 02:59 AM
2

Nothing. For women a creep is a guy who is weird, nervous, unconfident when approaching them.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/21 02:01 AM
2

Most women actually like being approached in public (if the guy is confident and pleasant). They love the attention. Luckily for them most creeps simply don't have the balls to cold approach.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/21 01:55 AM
0

Why you wanna approach girls in the club? Worst place for thag. If you wanna do cold approaches just do them throughout your day. Also most conversations will be done way before the ten minute mark is hit because the chicks simply won't be interested.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/21 01:53 AM
3

That guy claimed to be a medical professional, which in itself already is fraud, it has nothing to do with the sex. Maybe my wording was wrong, and the outside factors are not always irrelevant but it's hilarious that you have to nitpick such a super rare case which has nothing to do with your initial claim that claiming to be whatever the fuck is rape by deception. Just because a chick jumps on your dick because she thinks you a doc, pilot, rapper, whatever don't make it rape.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/21 01:45 AM
2

Lol at you for thinking every single conversation takes 10 min.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/21 01:42 AM
4

That article has absolutely nothing to do with the situation we're talking about right now.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/21 01:40 AM
3

The situation in which the person lied and the situation in which they obtained sexual consent are unrelated. Lol, you just completely nuked your argument. If the two situations are unrelated then how can the first situation (the lie) affect the second one? Guys shenever someone is talking nonsensical stuff just let them talk and they will inevitably tell on themselves, you don't even need to do anything. Fortunately, that's not a legal principle. It is. If you consent to sex, you consented to s…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/21 01:20 AM
3

There hasn't been a single case we're someone has been sued for pretending to be a doctor.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/21 10:59 PM
3

You can't consent to a lie or even a truth. You can only consent to an action, and in this specific example the action is sex. And the women is 100% free to go along with it or decline it if she doesn't want it. It's that simple.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/21 10:50 PM
3

I didn't say you, I said "wokies". Also you completely ignored my point things not being valid simply because there is a definition.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/21 10:49 PM
6

There is a definition for all kinds of shit, that doesn't make it valid. Wokies come up with dumb crap everyday. Just because there is a definition for cultural appropriation doesn't mean that it's actually a valid concept and everyone who has dreads is a racist. It's just dumb shit which rational people don't take seriously.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/21 10:41 PM
5

Every guy who fakes a job is allowing a women to consent to what is actually happening. She isn't forced to have sex. If she realizes that he isnt a real doctor she can leave anytime. Typical case of men bad, wahmen good
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/21 10:36 PM
3

Nobody cares about the literal definition, what people want to say is that it's rediculous and makes no sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/21 10:33 PM
6

I mean if you lie about why you were late to dinner on a tuesday and fuck someone on a friday, no. Yes by the definition you gave that you would take by deception. You can't cherry pick which situations are rape or not. If you tell someone you're a doctor in order to get them into bed but you're really a high school dropout, yes. If you sleep with someone only because he is a doctor or you think he is a doctor that's on you.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/21 10:31 PM
6

Nothing. People obviously just sit around in circles and chit chat about whatever the fuck to lead countries and companies.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/21 01:16 PM
6

Beeing good at social interactions is not sufficient to be a political or corporate leader. It requires way more qualities.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/21 01:10 PM
1

Not here in Germany. It's illegal to even sell those parts, not just use them. Also I'm talking about fenders. There are 100% fully legal fenders designed specifically for the different bike models brands like for example KTM sell. So the ugly stock fenders are not there because they have to be. Regulations are definitely not the reason.
/r/MGTOW25/04/21 04:21 PM
1

Then they wouldn't sell it in that area.
/r/MGTOW25/04/21 04:16 PM
1

That's not what I said. I said that there are fenders which don't look like a piece of shit and are still legal - even sold by the manufacturers themselves - so regulations are not the reason that the stock ones are trash.
/r/MGTOW25/04/21 04:13 PM
41

I wouldn't even listen to that shit. Just hang up and go on about your day.
/r/MGTOW25/04/21 04:03 PM
1

There are many legal fenders which do not look like the crap which is the stock one. The manufacturers themselves sell those.
/r/MGTOW25/04/21 02:26 PM
1

Elon Musk has like 10 different kids or something. He is definitely drowning in pussy, he is just an idiot when it comes to women.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/21 01:44 PM
0

Nah if regulations were the reason then there wouldn't be any official and aftermarket fenders. I think they just want the people to spend an extra 200 bucks on a better looking fender when they buy their new bike.
/r/MGTOW25/04/21 01:29 PM
13

Merica + dumb idiots who pick dumb majors are also dumb with money
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/21 09:45 PM
1

She is out of the relationship in that example. Women are leaving these relationships as I already explained. That doesn't erase them or mean they never took place. If they would do that there wouldn't be any problem. It becomes an issue when these women keep going back to the same types of men because they make their pussy tingle, or because they can't hold decent guys because of personality issues they have themselves. That's what makes them losers. I said she was a good partner. I'm not talki…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/21 08:53 PM
1

1 in 4 women are in one at some point and 1 in 7 men. "At some point of time." That's not what I asked. I talked about the general percentage of all relationships. And that is less than 10%. But there's also just mistreatment Which is what the OP is about and what I was talking about the whole time while you were ignoring it and brabbling on about abuse. You are responsible for your own actions, not those of other people. That's also what I was saying the whole time. The woman is "responsible" f…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/21 08:31 PM
1

I am not talking about abuse. I am talking generally. Is a woman responsible for her own life - in all aspects? Also what do you think is the percentage of abusive relationships?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/21 08:06 PM
1

And women aren't?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/21 07:38 PM
1

You know exactly what I'm saying, I explained it multiple times, you just don't like it. That there are women who get abused does not absolve the loser women, who are not abused, from accountability for picking and staying with shitty partners because they make their pussy tingle.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/21 07:02 PM
2

Yep. I don't get why anyone would involve themselves voluntarily with drama in other people's lives. Fuck that shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/21 03:40 PM
10

I would love to fly an ultralight one day. Those things look like so much fun & freedom.
/r/MGTOW24/04/21 12:01 PM
1

Most loser women - which is the topic of this thread - aren't abused, they simply pick shitty men. That's their own responsibility.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/21 11:59 AM
1

You keep going to extreme examples. I ignored it multiple times but you still didn't get the hint. The OP is about loser women, not about women who get abused big time by super toxic men. Most loser women aren't abused, but simply stupid and stay with bad men for the tingles.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/21 02:20 AM
1

They are. But women are too. It's not a one way street as many women would like it to be. "Accountability for thee, but not for me."
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/21 02:11 AM
2

They are responsible for staying with shitty people, not for the people being shitty in the first place.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/21 01:45 AM
2

OP is absolutely overexaggerating what it takes to get fit. Those men who spend 3 hours in the gym each day are not just fit, they are shredded.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/21 01:41 AM
1

Are you seriously comparing watching healthy and working out 3 times a week with professional athlete training?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/21 01:21 AM
2

Nobody who seriously works out wastes his effort by being a lazy slob while they're away from the gym.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/21 12:45 AM
5

Yoi should cut out that hours because it's wasted time.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/21 12:36 AM
1

Nobody said that they are responsible for the actions of others. They are responsible for their own actions.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/21 12:32 AM
2

That's utter bullshit. Unless you are 200 pounds overweight you don't need 3 hours of workout everyday.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/21 12:28 AM
2

No, but comparing women to children and bad relationships to rape to absolve them from accountability is simply pathetic.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/21 12:11 AM
2

Even 90 min is too long. Most workouts can be done in 45-60 min. If people take longer it's mostly because their talking to other people or are on their phones instead of working out.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/21 11:54 PM
2

Children are not responsible for how others treat them. Thanks for confirming that women are children. Accountability is cryptonite to any woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/21 11:53 PM
2

Well if the person stays with someone who treats them poorly, or keeps choosing the same kind of people, then that's on them. "Fool me once that's on you. Fool me twice, that's on me." It's really that simple.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/21 11:28 PM
3

Everyone gets treated poorly, that's not a symptom of a looser in itself. If someone gets treated poorly all the time then they are a loser because either they have low value and the people who would treat them well aren't interested in them or they willingly choose the people who are bad for them and overlook those who are good.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/21 11:15 PM
4

Beeing hot or rich does not automaticall make you not a loser.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/21 11:08 PM
1

The main cause of divorce is marriage. Men are just going the easy non-headache route of dropping out if marriage instead of wasting their time fighting the institution and being shamed and insulted for standing up for their rights.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/21 11:03 PM
5

That's exactly how it went. Most women didn't want the right to vote in the first place. It has been pushed by men and only a very small subset of women.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/21 11:01 PM
14

That example OP gave is way to extreme. Most fit people don't spend 3 hours in the gym everyday, that's crazy.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/21 10:53 PM
4

This is an overgeneralizied statement which cannot be applied to all situations. The harder way is not automatically the better way and the way of least resistance is not automatically the worst way. It depends on the situation and the personal motivations. Sometimes putting in the work is worth it & sometimes going the way of least resistance is better.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/21 11:28 PM
4

YES. /end thread
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/21 01:58 PM
3

First of all it was the original commenter who said that and also it's not made up there are levels to an ego. It's not fixed. Some have bigger egos than others.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/21 02:00 AM
3

You kidding me? Even a 3 year old would be intelligent enough to understand that "big ego" is what's meant there.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/21 01:41 AM
7

Yes for men who have a lot of access to sex - which 8's do - it's meaningless. That they fuck a chick doesn't mean shit. Women thinking they can use sex to get commitment is the only reason that high value guys have an all-you-can-fuck buffet.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/21 01:40 AM
1

Ouch.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/21 12:40 AM
6

Well if you don't even want to look up basic terms, to understand their meaning after not one, but two people point out two you that you didn't get them right and they don't mean what you think they mean, then there is no point in presenting any arguments as it would just be wasted time.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/21 12:39 AM
2

Interesting that that targeted ad is displayed in FDS
/r/MGTOW22/04/21 12:34 AM
6

A simple google search could easily tell you the differences and show you multiple studies. Why do people here need to be spoonfed? Do you not possess the intellectual capabilities required for a simple Google search?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/21 12:21 AM
7

Well now you know that it's two different things.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/21 12:14 AM
16

she clearly IS an 8....since an 8 thought to stick it to her. Thats not how it works. Men go down a lot lower for casual sex. Attractive men sleeping with average or even ugly women means nothing. Sex is practically meaningless to men. If an 8 fucks you that doesn't make you an 8, just quick way to his dick wet.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/21 12:08 AM
3

Wait, so you didn't get your state mandated girlfriend yet either?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/21 06:38 PM
2

Thats what it should be for, but that's not why most people who get married decide to do so.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/21 06:33 PM
5

They deny the culture of misoginy and rape culture Rape culture? Which rape culture?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/21 06:30 PM
1

Apologies, you said the 'main' reason. I didn't say 'main' either. Read this sentence again: "Sometimes it's the main or even sole reason, but it's never not the reason." This simply means that sex is always, in every circumstance, a motivator. Whether it's the main or only motivator or not depends on the man. But even when it's not the main or sole motivator it's always still a very strong motivator. Again, if they're strangers, it's weird. You may think that now but if it happens to you you wi…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/21 02:39 PM
1

Millions of graduate students in their mid twenties and early thirties would find this fascinating, do tell. In the US there are million of people around 30 in universities? How late to they enter them? It’s not the primary motivator though. At least for decent men. Never claimed that. All I'm saying is that it's a very strong motivator which is always there. your priorities are clearly something other than dating with intention. This statement is completely different from your 'sexual addiction…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/21 02:32 PM
1

If a group of people at work become friends, and 2 of them end up being a couple, then that's solely about sex? When did I ever use the term "solely". That's not what I said. I said "always", not "solely". You're missing the point entirely, feelings should come before sex and not the other way around. That's not how it works most of the times tho. Approach a woman they don't know/know very little and openly ask her out on a date. It's considered weird. That's not what men do. They don't just go …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/21 02:04 PM
1

Then he shouldn’t be asking me out. It makes zero sense. I'm not talking about asking you out. A man will not approach you at all, if he doesn't want to fuck you. Exactly. Which is why men of yesteryear asked women out through church or school. Most people who aren't kids are not in school anymore. And the men of today are smart enough to not shit where they eat so they don't approach anyone at work. For men who wander up to rando women in public, yeah probably. But that isn’t most men. Thank go…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/21 02:00 PM
1

Men don't approach random women on the street in my country I wasn't talking about cold approaches on the screen, but about any approaches in general. People get to know to each other and if attraction happens one person (usually the guy) makes it known, and they enter into a relationship. What do you think is the reason they even want to get to know each other? Men rarely do this in my country, if they do, they mostly get laughed at for being weird. Do what? Say "I'd like to get to know you bet…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/21 01:35 PM
2

It's not like it affected half the guys but there are definitely some guys (and girls) with self-confidence / self-worth issues which think that they are not good enough and reject people to not get rejected themselves or sabotage the relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/21 01:30 PM
3

Lol you're living in some delusional fantasy world. Every single guy who approaches you wants to fuck you. Every. Single. One. 'I think you're really pretty and I'd like to get to know you better' would be just fine, thinking about sex ALREADY? Hell nah. "I'd like to get to know you better" lmao. That translates into: I'd like to spend some time with you to maybe get the chance to fuck you. What did you expect. How are "you're pretty" and "I'd like to know you" even connected together? These two…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/21 12:48 PM
5

Instead of calling the police murderers you should push for more training. You know, do the logical thing instead of pushing a brainwashed agenda.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/21 11:17 AM
6

Never been careless? Everyone has been careless, and still is. But there is a very huge difference between being careless with sex or something minor like your phone. If I drop my phone and break the glass is that in the same level as a super irresponsible woman with almost no impulse control getting creampied and because of that pregnant? Absolutely not. Capitalist decisions geared towards profit and humanitarian ethical decisions are different. Not the same thing. Well most humans are very ego…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/21 03:12 AM
12

I don't know in what parallel universe you're browsing TRP but single moms are very rarely the topic there. Sometimes they get mentioned as red flag in advice posts, but that's it.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/21 03:00 AM
5

D&D is a tabletop game...
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/21 02:59 AM
12

There is nothing more cringy that men & women referring to themselves as kings or queens...
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/21 11:54 PM
2

Well but even extreme feminists have shown time and time again that they are not attracted to the kind of men who agree with their talking points - needy, pathetic, weak men. And masculine men don't take bullshit and dont deal with unattractive women and there is probably no bigger turnoff to them than a feminazi. Not even weight is as unattractive as a completely fucked up personality, so those ultra feminists will run into a problem. Red pill and non-acceptance of radical feminist talking poin…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/21 11:51 PM
3

The fire used to heat up or burn something is not heated up or burning itself tho. It's gory that's it. And that is a completely different adjective. Color (specifically paint) is colored because that adjective is a general one which applies to anything. Natural things like flowers which were not exposed to paint are also colored. So painted would be a more fitting term flint this example. The paint itself is just a vessel composed of sticky materials to make the actual paint particles hold onto…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/21 02:23 AM
5

Your fingers get wet, or an object Elon which water has been poured on (for example a piece of clothing) is wet when you touch it but not water. If you hold your hand into a bowl of water the water isn't wet, just your hand becomes wet.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/21 02:12 AM
6

Well actually water isn't wet. It can make things wet, but it's not wet itself. Just as fire makes things burn, but cannot burn itself.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/21 02:09 AM
2

One would be oxymoronic.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/21 02:08 AM
3

Well at the end of the day truth is truth.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/21 02:06 AM
3

It's funny how you condone cheating in men, but then go on to rationalize the cheating of your girlfriend with "wElL sHe Is HoTtEr ThAn HiM"
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/21 01:58 AM
2

Noone said all.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/21 12:52 AM
7

You're being reductive and childish. What if 2 people have been in a happy relationship but one of them decides they really want a child. Those people would probably break, that doesn't mean they hated each other You can cherry pick made up scenarios all you want, that Dienst change the fact, that most people who get divorced are either miserable or not capable of having a healthy LTR for other reasons.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/21 12:01 AM
1

The fact you compared to society to crack heads is all I needed. Lol. Its more telling that you didn't understand the comparison. It shows that the "logic" is so flawed that it allows for such a comparison. But thinking rationally doesn’t mean there needs to be so measurable benefit for them to get married rationally. Yes that's exactly what it means. Because unmeasurable benefits do not need a measurable, legally binding contract. I have a whole thing about holidays but I don’t think it’s worth…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/21 01:51 PM
1

That’s doesn’t mean it lacks utility I never said that. I simply said that it's completely stupid to use love as a reason to make obviously bad decisions. Holidays are important for no rational reason Absolutely wrong. Holidays are necessary. They are healthy. They increase creativity & prevent burnouts. as society we’ve agreed Crack junkies also agree in their social circle that it's good. That doesn't make it good tho. That's not how reasoning works. 1 billion can agree that something is good …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/21 01:43 PM
1

If something which is irrational is pushed by society, that doesn't change the fact that it's irrational. The "meaning" is just in people's head, it's not real. "Keeping up with the Joneses" is also pushed by society yet that doesn't change the fact that everyone who wastes their money on trying to impress others is a stupid idiot wasting their money. People who make decisions using their feelings always have way worse outcomes than people who use rational thinking. You thinking otherwise shows …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/21 01:18 PM
1

So in other words there is absolutely no benefits. Even if the benefits were subjective, they still would be measurable. That they aren't simply means that there are none. "The next step" is not a step, it's nothing. It's a pseudo step without any real substance pushed upon people by irrelevant, outdated societal norms. If you look at marriage from a rational perspective and leave out the irrational thinking like "I feeeeeeel" and you will see that there is absolutely no advantage. People really…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/21 12:55 PM
1

I said that there is no benefit to marriage. Apart from me never having talked about "dating", that's a very vague term. LTR vs. marriage would be a way more fitting comparison. If there is such a huge, exclusive, meaningful difference that only marriage can provide than you surely will not have any problem pointing it out?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/21 12:42 PM
2

But, let’s assume there is no benefit from marriage for men. Why are men getting married then? The Even 4th graders are capable of better logic. People do dumb shit all the time. That's not an argument. If Humans would not do things which are bad or useless to them, the world would be an utopia. But that's not the case. Hence there are men stupid enough to get married without properly thinking about the consequences first. Often it’s just a feeling of mowing you have a life partner. There are ma…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/21 01:31 AM
3

It's not only a "gotcha" but also the perfect counter for your absolutely nonsensical comment. Marriage is good because divorce is bad. Lol. And you keep brabbling about having presented logical arguments.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/21 01:24 AM
1

You keep simply stating things without presenting any real arguments. That's not how logic works. Multiple people have pointed out what the problems with your argumentation are and you haven't adressed a single one's points adequately.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/21 01:12 AM
1

Your OP claims that there is a "fair reason" for it which is simply wrong. The reasoning makes no sense when applying simple logic to it, therefore it's just not a "fair reason". There have been plenty of comments on the thread which pointed out how it's mainly just female neuroticism and I explained to you how it has nothing to do with objectification itself, so it's astonishing that you still think your initial claim is valid.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/21 01:03 AM
0

And that has nothing to do with objectification at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/21 12:20 AM
6

Approaching women weirdly ≠ objectification
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/21 11:37 PM
6

Your title is that there is a fair reason why objectification is harmful and your explanation only mentions approaches which are a completely different topic and then you say in a comment that you agree that objectification is not a problem, it's the approaches. Do you not see that that doesn't add up?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/21 11:35 PM
2

This directly contradicts your post.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/21 11:33 PM
9

You're mixing up objectification with retarded social behavior. A man does not have to approach a woman to objectify her. It's not part of the process. Those two things are completely different topics.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/21 11:29 PM
1

Well that's how Leykis passed it in his show. Back then the term girls was still often used for young women and not just for young children.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/21 10:26 PM
0

That means early twenties, not little children.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/21 10:20 PM
1

Don't waste your time trying to frame comments. Entitlement & pedophilia has absolutely nothing to do with my comment. Better luck next time.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/21 09:41 PM
9

What society does is irrelevant. What one sees as cheating is completely personal.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/21 07:44 PM
6

Same for for the woman. If she doesn't want to do anything to change the situation she should end the relationship instead of ranting about porn.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/21 07:43 PM
2

What's the best cure for erectile distinction? Y G. Young girls. -Tom Leykis (Clarification for people who don't know Tom Leykis: young means early twenties)
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/21 07:42 PM
11

Ah, so just because something has been done in the past, that means it's good and should be continued? Yeah, great logic. Men don't like starfish sex. Point blanc. That's not sex, that's using a woman as a human fleshlight. Not that much different to using your hand and a porn clip.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/21 07:40 PM
7

That's not a MGTOW problem tho. It's an individualistic philosophy. It only has to yield gold results for the people participating in it. The effects on anyone, or anything else are irrelevant.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/21 03:58 PM
3

That culture was built through shame tho. Without the societal expectations in asia, there wouldn't be any culture they could take with them, to prevent them from blowing up.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/21 03:51 PM
2

Is that what I did? No, I was talking generally. I think it's okay to politely advocate against it. I don't disagree, all I'm saying is, that it's not effective.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/21 01:06 AM
2

Lol every girl I've dated has gone vegetarian or vegan once they saw how much easier and enjoyable it was to be vegan than they previously thought See, this is exactly what we mean. Do not try to preach veganism to us. If we wanted to live that lifestyle we would do it on our own. I don't think there's anything wrong with civilly challenging [insert anything] There is nothing fundamentally wrong with it. It's just annoying to a lot of people and will not make any difference. You can't change peo…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/21 12:52 AM
2

The complete lack of masculinity taught to men these days is mind boggling. There, fixed it for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/21 12:41 AM
3

This is exactly why people don't like vegans (for relationships, not as humans), because they always try to convince others to do the same. People wanna eat meant, and don't want to prepare vegan food. When you hear people saying that just ignore it. Starting with "well actually preparing vegan food is not that hard, you just have to do xy n z and ab n c" will just annoy people. Do not discuss niche stuff with people who aren't enthusiastic about it. It never works.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/21 11:33 PM
0

Its not one or the other. There are many people who possess both intellectual & practical knowledge. Just stay clear from those who graduated on woke universities and you will be fine.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/21 11:30 PM
3

Then why do men blame male suicide on women sometimes? You need to ask the men who say that.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/21 08:01 PM
2

This is tradcuck bullshit. Men can drain their balls by simply fucking any chick, they don't need to keep one for that and men can cook for themselves or simply buy food. These days most women (actually people in general) are shit cooks and it unhealthy trash. But the most important thing is that men don't need emotional support from women, that's the most stupid thing ever. Women just love talking about it, because they don't have anything to offer that men actually want, so they make shit up t…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/21 02:19 PM
2

I'm not going to nut in every rando that wants her shot Well that's not what the sentence implicates. Caring about sex doesn't translate into fucking everything that has a pulse. That said, if I had to pick only one it would be sex. Exactly.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/21 11:54 AM
2

You don't say?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/21 11:40 AM
4

I'm a strong believer that the idea of being sexually desirable is more important than the actual "act" of having sex. Yeah, no. Just no. But I could be wrong Definetly. Do you feel fulfilled after getting your fix? Most men feel fulfilled after nutting. Post sex disgust / regret is a thing which effects women way more than men. Or would you trade it all to be attractive? I guess that would depend on how unattractive one is and how much money one would make. For people who are very ugly, causing…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/21 10:59 AM
1

The human race won't go extinct. There are enough uneducated and poor people reproducing and that will never change. And yes choosing to not care and let the world go to shot is also a choice. Just because you don't like it doesn't mean it's not a choice. There are plenty of people who choose that way completely freely.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/21 09:33 AM
1

I know that my mission and aspirations don't make my man's dick hard. So what? So, nothing. Keep doing what you're doing. It's important that he supports me in it It's important for you, not for RP men. But I wouldn't stop doing what I'm doing because it doesn't make me hotter, wtf. Nobody says you should.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/21 09:28 AM
-1

It's not. But it's not the kind of relationship dynamic the average red pilled wants, of he even wants a relationship at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/21 09:22 AM
2

more women than ever are paying their ex-husbands Its still an extremely small number. Also it's a non-issue as Red Pillers won't marry any women no matter how much she makes.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/21 09:20 AM
5

No. Of course they don't expect men to support women as they don't expect it from women either. Their big "issue" is that "support" from women in most cases is useless. What exactly can a woman do to help a man with his mission, that he can't do himself? And what benefit would he have from helping a women with her "mission", if she even has one, which is not the case for most women. And should she have one, that's rather irrelevant to men, especially RP men as ambition is not a trait that makes …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/21 09:18 AM
7

Most people talk about it like sperm donors. Because that's how they see these men. As sperm donors & resource providers.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/21 02:47 AM
20

Do red pill men support a woman’s mission in the same way that women are expected to support their male partner’s mission? No. /exit thread
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/21 01:01 AM
5

This sounds a lot like your attracting damaged women, because your damaged yourself. This is why men (and every other gender, apache helicopters too) shouldn't date if they are not mentally healthy. It's too fucked up.
/r/MGTOW09/04/21 12:58 AM
1

Yes it is. It's necessary to not commit crimes in order to be free and not get put in prison, yet everyone has the free choice to still do it and face the consequences.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/21 11:08 PM
2

The fact the men on this sub thing kids are optional for us as a country or species is so oblivious This is a dumb, wrong generalization. It's that having kids is a free personal choice. That doesn't mean that they are not needed for sustainability of a country. Learn to read. Also this has nothing to do with the original argument. Women have a few choice. End of story.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/21 08:02 PM
1

Doesn't sound like a choice It is tho. Also getting children is a extremly egoistic devisioncand has absolutely nothing to do with society. We're not living in tribes anymore. Noone gets chicken because it's necessary. Anyone who gets children does it because they want them. The market should be forced to create an environment that let's woman produce said babies or you end up with Japan going extinct in 200 years. It's already happening: daycare. But what you are forgetting is that babies need …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/21 07:34 PM
16

These idiots be talking out if their asses when it is scientifically proven that animals which could be described as "adorable" like dogs, cats, ducks, etc. help with mental health. Also that the first commenter talked so nasty about dogs, is enough to show what kind of person she is. Any man who breaks up with such women dodges a really huge bullet.
/r/MGTOW08/04/21 03:41 PM
1

Ah because a single anectodal story obviously dement's stats which clearly show that the % of women who go into tech startups is minimal. You know what's even more interesting, if you look how many women actually found startups, not work with them, found them. That is even lower. Women are simply way more risk averse then men and are not interested in the highly profitable fields, that's all
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/21 03:21 PM
5

$ print "YES" $ sudo killall thread
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/21 02:35 PM
2

Their business ideas are just not that competitive. Ever thought about that? Most female startups are done in health, food, style, fitness, etc. areas and not in engineering, finance or software development, where the real money is made, that's why they don't get funding.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/21 02:32 PM
4

I didn't know windows wore dresses.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/21 10:19 AM
3

Again, it's a completely free, personal choice. Women can always search for men which want to be stay at home dad's, not get children or simply send them to daycare. Noone is forcing women to do anything, they are actively choosing it.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/21 03:51 AM
2

Everyone has to choose. The notion that one could "have it all" is a delusion which is only present in women for sein reason.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/21 03:39 AM
2

And that's their free choice and has nothing to do with "patriarchy".
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/21 03:29 AM
1

You should sprinkle in some of the sexist stuff women do and watch her hamster in cognitive dissonance.
/r/MGTOW08/04/21 02:34 AM
36

"fair share". What kind of bullshit. Fair share of what? Women don't deserve anything of your money, just because they are sucking your dick.
/r/MGTOW08/04/21 02:27 AM
3

Nobody is forcing women to be mothers anymore, yet the ration of female inventors & startups did not increase significantly
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/21 02:09 AM
4

"confidence gap" lol. Women always have to invent some stupid crap as excuses. Men invented shit even before there were societies, let alone knowledge about what confidence is. Men are simply way more disagreeable and do not require a pat on the back at every little step to do something. These days there are fully paid scholar ships and propaganda to push women into STEM and they still aren't doing it. They just don't want to. It's that simple. In Sweden, the most equal country on the planet the…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/21 11:02 PM
7

Go ahead and google how many % of startups are created by women. It's not just that women aren't suited for those positions, they don't want them. When getting pushed into them without having to do any real work due to quotas they obviously take them, but they don't want them if they have to actually put in effort to succeed.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/21 10:12 PM
2

Hm weird. Most men don't care as they don't value the women either. For them they're just a human sex doll. If guys actually get offended, then that's stupid. You can't get butthurt about beeing objectified, If you're doing the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/21 05:52 PM
1

Do they need to read your mind to understand that you might not be worth the risk in the future? This isn't a court of law. They don't see me as a risk. There is absolutely no reason for them to think that. So yes they would need to read my mind to think that, as nothing what I'm doing indicates that in the slightest. TRP as a whole argues that it's fine to do though overall. Is that surprising? Isn't "we are amoral" like the first thing you read when you first enter the sub? It helps that I wan…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/21 04:30 PM
1

Long press on = (for reference: I'm using Gboard, could be different for you, but a quick google search should do the job)
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/21 04:27 PM
1

You just said that LTRs in general are getting less common and that people (especially men) are caring less and less about societal pressure. This comment completely opposes what you just posted just one comment ago. Single mothers are already actively avoided and sometimes even shamed. They have absolutely no social leverage whatsoever. What you're saying makes no sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/21 04:26 PM
7

Or "You're strong & independent and don't need a man. You can do it alone."
/r/MGTOW07/04/21 04:21 PM
1

≠ would like to know your location
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/21 04:18 PM
1

Wdym by "social legitimacy values"?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/21 04:15 PM
1

You get called out for this once and it ruins your current social life with anyone that trusts you. Called out on what? It's impossible for people to know wether you're doing something because you genuinely want to, or just because you think it will be beneficial to you. They can't look inside your head and read your mind. If she asks you specificially and you say: "Yes I am interested in a relationship" is a much better example. Well that's something I wouldn't do, because that would result in …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/21 03:58 PM
2

I have never seen a man react negatively to getting casual sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/21 03:35 PM
1

And the way you clearly talked about it was just not beneficial for you. Are you kidding me? This is an ultra clear sentence "Following morals is only beneficial as long as it is used to improve your social status which then improves your life." How can you not understand it. What you are talking about is exactly what I do. It's exactly what that sentence explains. So you're not amoral, but you're fine with others being immoral. That's what your claim is. It doesn't actually help this discussion…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/21 03:34 PM
1

So what? That's not the topic. You can't argue super general stuff if a super specific case is being discussed. Other forms of owlet are completely irrelevant to this discussion. It is specifically about "getting away with something". That means not facing any form of repercussions from other people. That's it.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/21 03:05 PM
5

But that parameter renders the comment useless. That is my point.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/21 03:02 PM
2

Because following these rules are extremely beneficial for you as well? Are you not able to read? Following morals is only beneficial as long as it is used to improve your social status which then improves your life. That you wrote your first two paragraphs about something which I already clearly talked about shows me that you didn't read my comments properly at all. What's the point of arguing if you don't listen to the other person? If you want a proper discussion read all my comments closely …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/21 03:02 PM
4

Then don't answer the question saying you would.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/21 02:50 PM
2

All Facebook crap is to be abolished. I really hope that new blockchain technologies will be developed to make anonymous, privacy respecting social media platforms possible. And I have high hopes on the new Rich Text Standard to be the successor of the SMS. it does not support encryption by default, by atleast it's an open platform messengers could build on. They could just all use the same encryption standard and add the ability to share private Keys through QR Code or NFC which would make them…
/r/MGTOW07/04/21 02:18 PM
3

Wdym? Single mothers have the lowest RMV of all women.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/21 02:16 PM
6

The point is that most women (well actually people in general, but it hurts women more, as their looks at more important than men's) don't stay in shape in their thirties. The obesity rate is through the roof.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/21 02:15 PM
4

Are you gonna argue this from a psychopaths perspective? Really? That's your defense? I'm arguing this from an egoistic perspective. Why should I give a fuck about arbitrary morals which have been created by a society which doesn't care about me? Makes no sense whatsoever. Following morals is only beneficial as long as it is used to improve your social status which then improves your life. Moral egoism is not helped by mistreating others, in fact the polar opposite Exactly. It's about treating y…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/21 02:10 PM
3

That's not how it works. Why do women always make up hypothetical scenarios, to then alter them to their benefit and claim that they would actually have no problem with the scenario. It's always the same. Yeah I would accept X, Y and Z as long as [insert parameters] is the case. You can't say you would accept not having a lot of relationship prospect if you still had your husband, because that would make it completely irrelevant. That would be like an investor saying "yeah I would be fine with h…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/21 02:02 PM
3

They don't get away with it tho. They simply kill or oppress everyone who doesn't agree with them. That's a completely different thing from people willingly not punishing you for destructive behavior like women killing people and not having to go to jail.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/21 01:55 PM
9

If I understand it correctly it cannot be used as evidence to convict someone, bit it can always be used to prove your innocence. A judge cannot punish you for a crime when there is crystal clear evidence, that you are innocent, no matter how the evidence was created.
/r/MGTOW07/04/21 01:47 PM
13

Well if your in a tricky situation and the recording could save your ass, it's always better to have broken a privacy law than whatever the fuck you are accused of.
/r/MGTOW07/04/21 11:07 AM
3

Okay good. Then we know what's wrong with it. They don't follow ethical rules. Which means that they're fine with whoever they're hurting to get what they want. You did just answer your own question. So what? What would be the benefit of following rules? Everything I like is Alpha and everything I dislike is Beta? Thus the more things you dislike, the Betaer it is? It's more like "everything which helps getting laid is alpha and everything which doesn't is beta". How is prosocial different from …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/21 10:40 AM
2

whether a woman wants to fuck them, as though that's some sort of prize. It is. It's the only prize most of TRP men want. like they can't grasp that women use men for sex as often as men use women. The point is: men don't care about beeing "used" by women. They actively want it and it's not beeing used. How can you be used by someone who gives you exactly what you want?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/21 10:27 AM
3

I know of no application of ethics where it says that you can take morals out of a dating scenario. If you know the theory you're perfectly fine to explain it to me. Because the guy who said that dating is amoral (which is a comment as a source), knows jack shit about ethics. You don't understand. The point is that many TRP men simply don't give a fuck about ethics. A bimodal spectrum to explain human behavior is just bad. Humans have way TRP wants to get laid, not create an award winning scient…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/21 10:22 AM
2

I think this is wrong, the reason is that if you wait for things, a lot of the time you realise that you didn't really want the thing. This is exactly what I mean when I say that it kills the shiny object syndrome. The other thing is I always try to think "how long do I have to work to pay for this" (or how much longer to pay for the more expensive version). For me at least, that really brings it home how much crap costs. Yep. I forgot to mention that. If you think I have to work X hours to pay …
/r/MGTOW07/04/21 10:16 AM
-7

Only dumb people associate bad grammar in foreign languages with lack of education. If anyone really thinks lesser of someone because their english is not perfect, then they are flat out stupid and their opinion is to be ignored. I never care about that shit. As long as I'm able to understand what the other person is saying I wouldn't mind even if they were talking like yoda.
/r/TheRedPill07/04/21 02:57 AM
4

What does this have to do with your initial claim that TRP would attract FDS type women? To answer the question: they don't care, and many women do think highly of them and even try to establish LTRs.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/21 02:21 AM
68

If there is one thing I hate the most about the internet, then it's people apologizing for their "bad" english and then going ahead and writing a post which doesn't have a single mistake besides commas which nobody cares about anyways.
/r/TheRedPill07/04/21 02:19 AM
4

They don't "want" them, but they don't care about it, as their goal is sex and not an LTR.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/21 02:09 AM
3

You seem to misunderstand what dominant means. And you also have no idea what type of women TRP attracts. Depending on how closely the tactics are followed, it's mostly a mix of regular women & mentally damaged women. Maybe it attracts FDS type women, but they are ghosted before it could be abundantly clear wether they are FDS or not anyways.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/21 01:24 AM
5

Almost all women want dominant & confident men.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/21 01:12 AM
8

Um no, it's exactly the opposite. TRP doesn't go for women which make men wait.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/21 01:03 AM
2

Wdym?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/21 12:51 AM
18

It's because of the last sentence. "Mutual benefit is not the goal" which translates into "healthy relationships are not the goal, I am a kween and men must worship the ground I'm walking on and put in tons of effort while I do nothing but receive (and fuck other guys in the side) and If they don't do that they are low value"
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/21 12:47 AM
5

Honkpill is similar to acceptance, but through (dark) humor. Find a way to laugh. In today's fucked up 🤡🌍 political climate sarcasm is the only way to go.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/21 12:44 AM
8

10 is a pretty low estimation. While I don't count the RP comments, I think that there are definitely more than just 10 red pilled people here.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/21 12:41 AM
6

Most RP guys don't lie, because it's simply not necessary and remembering which lie you told which women is annoying af.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/21 12:37 AM
1

Problem with TRP is that they argue that dating is amoral Why is that a problem? They also base themselves on the whole extremely weak concept of "Alpha/Beta" males. Obviously Alpha & Beta are not absolutes it's a spectrum. Alpha & Beta are simply used to indicate that a man has way more Alpha/Beta traits than the opposite. The terms are only used in a sexual context as that is what TRP is about. That means men like Bill Gates or Elon Musk, which are very masculine on an intellectual & business …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/21 12:37 AM
-1

The mods here aren't blue pilled at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/21 12:31 AM
11

A mix of black pill, red pill, anectodal evidence & common sense is what describes reality the best. The blackpilll is right in its basic assumptions but drifts off into pessimism, while TRP is way more accurate but can be a tad too optimistic at times, especially in regards to height & physical attractiveness (it is still a net positive as working on yourself always benefits anyone even if doesn't lead to the desired outcome). Also some of the points are way too generalized. Adding common sense…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/21 12:30 AM
30

If you look at the market you will see so many manufacturers which provide products with great value where you don't have to miss out on much but still save a lot of money. Especially in the tech/gadget market. If you buy a phone for 200-400 instead of 1000 bucks you save a shit ton of money but still have almost all features. Same for TVs, headphones, Laptops, Smart Home devices etc. There are also plenty of great cars you can get used in good condition and still have all the comfortable featur…
/r/MGTOW06/04/21 11:09 PM
2

Agreed, but it's too late for the guys who already married.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/21 10:02 PM
7

Men who stood enough to marry can't just pack their things and leave as they will be assfucked financially.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/21 09:59 PM
1

I'm not sure there are enough sub men who are also super hot for women to do this on a great scale.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/21 09:40 PM
6

Yes it is a choice. She can either accept it or leave. Telling a woman that you want the same sexual acts from her, that she did to other guys in the past isn't the same as holding a gun to her head and forcing her. She is always free to say no. And in that case you simply leave her. This is not in any form coercion.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/21 09:28 PM
9

In that example the man already got a hoe. She just doesn't want to be a hoe with him. That's the point.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/21 09:25 PM
12

If I was happy with how the relationship was going That's the point. If you heard that, you wouldn't be happy with how the relationship is going anymore.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/21 09:21 PM
8

Look into sociosexuality. People who have a lot of casual sex are vastly different than people who don't and therefore not compatible with them. It's not fucked up at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/21 09:12 PM
9

This has nothing to do with impatience, these guys just don't want women who have lots of casual sex. And it doesn't have anything to do with respect either. Waiting with sex is no problem as long as the woman is a relationship type girl. Doesn't make sense (from a man's perspective) to wait for a casual sex Woman tho.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/21 09:11 PM
19

I'm not denying that system oppression has existed and still exists to a certain degree. My point is that it is retarded to use it as justification to be racist against white men and saying shit like "black people can't be racist" and other crap.
/r/TheRedPill06/04/21 05:23 PM
124

It's just another way of phrasing that "systemic oppression" bullshit.
/r/TheRedPill06/04/21 03:47 PM
1

Indecisiveness is obviously a bad thing
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/21 01:37 PM
0

Let me guess, in your opinion such a thing as an immune system does not exist and claiming that it does is also insane?
/r/MGTOW05/04/21 10:39 PM
9

Attractive women don’t have harder time dating, they just have higher standards. The higher standards is what makes the dating harder. Because they only aim for men on their income level and higher while men date on all income levels, they have a way smaller dating pool than the men.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/21 07:12 PM
26

The first things which come to mind are smoking, taking drugs and obsessive social media usage.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/21 06:34 PM
25

This is the first time you said something which actually makes sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/21 06:30 PM
2

Das stimmt nicht ganz. Es gibt viele, die erbärmlich genug sind, Trostpreis zu spielen.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/21 01:54 PM
1

Not really. The end result is the same: the man looses interest. Wether the women also looses interest doesn't change the interest level of the man.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/21 01:52 PM
1

Yep, regret is a different thing, it sometimes is linked to PNC, but it's not the same thing. OP just didn't explain it in enough detail.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/21 07:01 PM
9

Who gives a fuck? They could also claim that they're running the United States, that still doesn't make them the president. These guys are just pure cringe and anyone who takes them seriously can't be helped.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/21 06:52 PM
7

Who cares? Rollo is a piece of cringe. Didn't he pull that born again virgin, I found to god crap some time ago?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/21 06:49 PM
4

Um, no. The Red Pill, just as any other shade of the manosphere is completely decentralized. It is just a bunch of information which is not attached to anything or anyone. There is no central authority, no leader, no nothing. All the people who think there are leaders or call it movement simply don't understand it.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/21 06:48 PM
10

You are confusing PUA and RP there. Most PUA's are cringelords sharing advice which maybe works, maybe not and try to seel overpriced courses or coaching sessions, while many regular RP creators just upload RP content without selling anything. Some of them also sell things, but it's mostly stuff like merchandise and not coachings.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/21 06:45 PM
1

😂
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/21 03:12 PM
3

Ah really? I would love to know how to do that. Because so far changing anything didn't work. I even started with easy stuff like color or food prefernce, but nothing changed, I still hate yellow & green and avocados still taste like shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/21 03:10 PM
2

No idea, bluepill is too irrational & delusional for me to bother trying to understand it.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/21 02:09 AM
6

Well actually he was a volcel aka mgtow monk
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/21 01:59 AM
7

I'm surprised about the amount of reasonable comments which called out OP for their bullshit.
/r/MGTOW03/04/21 05:39 PM
6

Because men are fucking stupid. Noone should ever trust a women on birth control (or anything which is really important). It's very easy: if you don't control it (which men don't), there is no control. But at the end of the day there are still enough stupid guys who will believe a chick which is lying and stupid enough to think that she can lock down a guy down by getting pregnant. Women have full reproductive control but when they exercise it, somehow they think they can just push over the resp…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/21 05:02 PM
6

Women's choice to get creampied by dudes who have absolutely no intention to raise a child. Your body, your choice, remember? It's always funny to see how women want to have all the power but no responsibility at all. Whatever it is, it's always only the men's fault.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/21 01:52 PM
7

I guess you don't realize that he's probably doing that on purpose, because he doesn't want to be seen as a successful rich guy by leeches.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/21 01:48 PM
1

I'm not talking about VLOGs, I agree they are boring af, I am talking about real videos, which have substance and not just some dude turning on the camera and grabbling on for 10 minutes. I mean channels like FortNine (this is not a typo, that's how it's called).
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/21 11:30 PM
1

Those statistics are from YouTube Analytics of multiple english speaking motorcycle channels on YouTube, so they are very representative. You are projecting your own experience onto all women. You are rare. Most women aren't bikers.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/21 11:06 PM
3

Nope your not. The amount of women who are interested in motorcycles is 1-3%. No that's not right. From people who are interested in motorcycles only 1-3% are women. So the amount of women who are interested I nature like that is way lower than 1%
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/21 09:37 PM
2

Regular women. They don't tend to be interested in bikes or doing random shit for a little adrenaline spike. Women which are interested in "manly" stuff are pretty rare.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/21 07:24 PM
1

I didn’t say that. I don’t believe men are a monolith group who all think the same way Then you gotta be more vocal about that. If you use words in a way in which they are used for generalizations, people are gonna think that you're generalizing. You need to mention that your only talking about a specific group beforehand. You don’t see the benefit in a relationship with a man unless it’s for sex/relationship. That’s the bottom of it. I guess you mean women here. And no that's not my opinion. I …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/21 05:31 PM
-1

No. You claim men don't want (real) friendships with women because they only see them as sexual objects, which is completely wrong as explained in my comment. Did you even read it completely?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/21 04:54 PM
0

Sorry I confused you with another user. Apart from the misogyny part (which is edited out now) everything else in the comment still holds through.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/21 04:41 PM
5

Ah yeah, so anyone who uses the official definition of equal with proper context, instead of using a synonym to not upset the sensitive wokeflakes, who have such an extreme inferiority complex that they think anything is a personal attack, is automatically a misogynist who believes women are inferior to men. Logic 100 This manipulative bullshit is the reason, why all your posts and comments aren't taken seriously by anyone with even the slightest bit of intelligence.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/21 04:30 PM
1

But those men also don't know when HE IS that toxic crap and the manipulative narcissist being cut out. Who gives a fuck? We don't want to deal with these kinds of people so we cut them out. End of story. It's not our responsibility to fix them. Still beats being lonely sex-obsessed incel who doesn't understand the difference between love and lust and rant about wanting to burn society down. /Thread You see, you keep steering the conversation into a bullshit direction which has nothing to the wi…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/21 03:52 PM
1

Women will put up with shitty women more than men will put up with shitty men. A shitty woman will have shallow friendships, but a shitty man will have no friends. You have just confirmed exactly what he said. Men don't accept toxic crap and just cut out manipulative narcissists from their lives while women just stay "friends" with women they hate and put on an act. That's not a friendship, that's an anti-friendship.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/21 03:21 PM
6

if a man cannot possibly see themselves ever being friends with a woman then there’s inherently something in them (thought, opinion) that is telling them that women aren’t their equals No shit sherlock. Men and women are NOT equal and wll never be. He just explained that they are fundamentally different and you counter with, well but it seems they are different and not equal... You confirmed exactly what he said and just added a negative connotation to it. Men and women aren't equal. And now? Ho…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/21 03:19 PM
3

Optimistic Nihilism joined the chat
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/21 01:05 AM
1

He literally says, no man. Yes, that's an expression. Languages are not to be taken literally 24/7. Have you never heard someone say "nah man, that movie is trash, nobody on earth likes that". Do you actually think, that in that situation they really mean every single person on earth? No, obviously not. No. It was about education and modern women. He asked her if she was single and she said no. Asked her long they have been together, said 6 years, asked why she isn't married and she should of be…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/21 01:38 PM
1

I understand that but when he speaks in absolutes aka no man will want to be a step father. It goes against biological nature for a man to want to take care of another man's child Those are called exaggerations. Obviously he doesn't mean every single man on earth when he says "no man wants to do xyz". Being a LTR when both of you are in your 20's and him asking why she stayed, why isn't she married yet, she should of married in her early 20's - makes no sense if he also claims mens marriage brai…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/21 01:09 PM
1

Well he apparently was divorced twice and a step father in one of those marriages So what. He was not fortunate enough to be saved from that mistake from freely available information. In his time there was no internet, and the societal expectations were different. People don't have to be perfect flawless angels to be allowed to give advice. Mistakes are how people learn and grow. but when he gets callers who have been in LTR in their 20's and asks why she didn't get married to the guy - she will…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/21 12:49 PM
1

What exactly are you 'sniffing' on him?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/21 12:29 PM
1

Edited
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/21 10:06 AM
2

"I can make anyone like me" I never wrote anything even remotely close to that. You just pulled that out of your ass.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/21 03:52 AM
0

Better Bachelor and Aba & Preach are way more mainstream. Simply because of the advertiser friendly, non-toxic contents they are able to reach way more clicks.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/21 02:45 AM
1

No. I don't give a fuck about you. Do whatever you want. That's not what "how you act will influence others" means. There are always idiots, or people who simply don't like you no matter what you do. You ignore those and focus on the rest.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/21 02:42 AM
1

Who says that it's not an adult with a grown ass?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/21 10:07 PM
1

Yeah obviously that's a reason too. What I was talking about was people being afraid if being "alone" because they have no real friends for company.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/21 10:02 PM
1

How often do I need to repeat it untill you understand that control does not mean 100% probability.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/21 10:01 PM
1

Yep, you still didn't understand it. Again. Control ≠ 100% influencing the outcome. Control means actively doing something to change the outcome. That's it. If you sit around on your ass and do nothing obviously you have no control - at all. But if you get up and start working you control your life. Because by acting you are changing the outcome and steering your life in the direction you want. Obviously you can't change other people's actions. But you can change your own actions. That is the po…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/21 10:00 PM
2

You picked literally the worst red pill content creators out there. There are so many non-toxic channels which give good advice like Better Bachelor, Coach Greg Adams, Aba & Preach (don't call themselves red pilled but are), How To Beast, AMS, Kevin Samuels, etc. and a bazillion of self improvemt & entertainment channels which not actually red pill, but very strongly red pill leaning. This post is a prime example of cherry picking.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/21 09:55 PM
6

Matthew Hussey is the worst of all. He is using desperate women by telling them exactly what they want to hear, while providing little to no actually useful advice. And since women are so agreeable and more emotionally influenced he can make big bank by selling trash to an army of desperate women. Good advice never feels good. Never. How should that even be possible. If you need advice that means your doing something wrong. If someone keeps telling you stuff you agree with and like and never tel…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/21 09:49 PM
1

Yes you do. By actively working on it, you influence the people around you and therefore produce a different outcome - which means you control the outcome.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/21 09:42 PM
2

I don't know wether we agree or not. Since you were constantly misusing the term control, I distill don't know what exactly you were trying to say. Elaborate it again using proper definitikns, because I still think you mean something different.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/21 09:40 PM
1

Sadly most people don't have that. And that's the reason so many people don't value non-sexual company and think relationships are absolutely needed for company and jump from relationship to relationship even if they're bad.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/21 09:33 PM
2

You seem to not understand what "out of control" means. Out of control means there is absolutely no control at all. And the opposite - control - does not mean that the control is 100%, just that it's there. You can everything which is not 100% certain "out of control", that's not the meaning of the term. No it doesn't. It just means you've lowered the chances of an undesireable outcome. THIS IS CONTROL. No control would mean you can't influence it at all. Not even a train with dead brakes is out…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/21 09:30 PM
1

The point is the chance that it works is very high, especially if you out in a lot of effort. Just saying "nothing is 100% safe, therefore it's useless to try" is stupid.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/21 09:25 PM
2

~But you can't force it to drink.~ Well actually you can. Just waterboard it. It will inevitably swallow some water.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/21 09:24 PM
-2

Absolutely wrong. How other people treat you depends on how YOU act. Just saying "it won't work anyways, no need to try tehee" is just a lazy excuse to not even try. That's learned helplessness.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/21 09:23 PM
2

That's what "really good friends" are for. With those you stay in contact through WhatsApp, Discord, etc. and visit them regularly (unless they're in another continent, then you can do it maybe once a year).
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/21 08:57 PM
4

That's why I explicitly said "good friends" and not "buddies you meet once a month to do xyz".
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/21 08:49 PM
3

Luck exists. But the main problem is that people treat pre-action luck as post-action luck. Life is not a video game where every little interaction is based on chances. You get handed your cards once, and after that, whatever you do with them is completely up to you.
/r/TheRedPill22/03/21 03:58 PM
2

This is the worst one. Because the people who say it trick themselves into seriously believing that they could have done it. It's even worse than the I'm unlucky bullshit.
/r/TheRedPill22/03/21 03:54 PM
5

it’s knowing what their worth is and won’t put up with bullshit that a lot of guys bring Well the point is, that that doesn't help at all with attracting a good man.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/21 03:38 PM
12

You probably never had really good friends in your life.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/21 08:14 PM
3

Won't change the fact that your wallet is gone
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/21 11:56 PM
1

Having a purpose is very important for men, but the purpose needs to have a worthy end goal to it. You need to be able to get that carrot and it has to be worth the effort asked. Just ignore the tradcuck bullshit and pick a different purpose than "gEt A wIfE aNd FaMiLy". Then the advice is good.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/21 09:09 PM
2

Maybe it's just that most attractive men are smart enough to avoid you and hence you don't notice them?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/21 08:48 PM
2

That's not the problem. The problem is that OP asked about getting busted and the guy who replied didn't get busted. He said that he called the cops to prevent getting busted and explained what could hypothetically happen to him if he didn't involve the cops. That does not answer the original question and him saying "that happened to me" as first thing, implying that exactly what OP had asked happened to him, made it even worse.
/r/MGTOW14/03/21 10:30 PM
2

That's not at all what's written in the post.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/21 12:04 AM
4

Does she compensate in other areas of life (school/career/success) Still have high bonding affinity Does she demonstrate loyalty, trust How many were boyfriends How long did the boyfriends last (any 2-5 years?) How does she reflect on "that period or year" of her life (proud vs sad/unhappy) How long has it been since that part of her life Her reason for increasing partner count (heart broken by a cheating LTR of her own, say) Are parents together? Are friends in LTRs or partiers? Those questions…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/21 11:16 PM
4

You just explained it to yourself. You respect those people because you know them. They did something to earn your respect. You can't respect a random person on the street that you have never seen before in your life and don't know at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/21 06:38 PM
2

I think you are confusing respect with politeness. Not respecting a person is nothing negative, it's neutral. Just because you don't respect a person you don't know doesn't mean you can't be polite to them.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/21 06:36 PM
7

This was a great read. Could you post links to some additional resources? I would love too dive deeper into that topic.
/r/MGTOW11/03/21 07:48 PM
1

Convenience bro. Staying inside Googles Ecosystem allows for easy synchronization between all services.
/r/MGTOW10/03/21 07:16 PM
3

"Killing is wrong" is not an objectively true statement. In the past there were many societies were killing was completely accepted or even integral part of the culture.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/21 06:50 PM
2

Thus the analogy is supposed to prove that any rp strategy isnt inherently wrong in itself. No, it's simply supposed to prevent people from spamming the sub with moralizing statements. Most RPers simply don't give a fuck about what others think. Their opinion on RP tactics is not supposed to be in the sub, as it provides no value to the members.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/21 06:48 PM
1

Why would a man want to hide scars?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/21 03:20 AM
8

Correction: what's at stake is your physical & mental wellbeing, your happiness and your money and marrying anyone is a gamble
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/21 10:18 PM
2

Link?
/r/MGTOW23/01/21 07:00 PM
1

When will people finally understand that NAWALT is not a working argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/21 11:35 PM
1

So what?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/20 08:48 PM
2

Who gives a fuck about what other people want? I watched the series to pass time during quarantine and didn't know befkrehand how retarded the last two seasons were.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/20 08:26 PM
1

I didn't watch GoT untill a few months ago. Never had a problem. I simply didn't care about it. If people started talking about it, I simply went talking to other people about a Topic I found interesting. It's that simple.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/20 06:40 PM
1

Both sides make what is perceived as an equitable trade That's the point. Perception. It's not a representation of reality. Peoples perception of marriage is inflated by society. And btw saying "If it was bad people wouldn't do it." is a kindergarden level argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/20 06:04 PM
4

Even the average girl doesn't watch the mindless crap which is shown in tv. Every normal young person (including gamers) watches Netflix/Prime Video and has seen the most popular movies.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/20 05:58 PM
2

Gamers also watch movies and series lol. Just because you are playing video games doesn't mean that you don't watch movies. And normies also play videogames. Seems like your still living in 2010. If you don't notice yet: video games went mainstream long ago.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/20 05:55 PM
9

Who gives a fuck about what women want? Only pathetic wimps engage in the boring convos women have. I never did that and never had any problems. You know what normal people do? They pick a topic both people (or all, if it's a group) are interested in and leave and talk to someone else / change the topic whenever the convo starts getting boring. I have never in my life engaged in the useless chitchatting & gossiping women do and never will and I also don't expect them to listen to me endlessly ta…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/20 05:51 PM
5

Fighting over a woman is the most pathetic thing any man can do.
/r/MGTOW06/12/20 05:41 PM
15

Oh yeah your right. People talking about the newest episode of desperate housewives or whatever crap they have seen on tv has waayyyyy more value.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/20 05:38 PM
5

What are you talking about? Videogames have all kinds of positive effects if you play them right. They improve reflexes, ability to notice little contrast differences in darkness, hand-eyes coordination, problem solving skills, spatial thinking, teamwork & communication, creativity etc. I wouldn't say that that is a low ROI. Obviously if you play Candy Crush for hours on end there's no positive effects but that's different if you play tactical shooters or RTS (realtime-strategy) games for exampl…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/20 05:27 PM
20

Simply report him in another city where the cops don't know him.
/r/MGTOW06/12/20 05:09 PM
1

Women risk the same thing as men: time. And time is free. It's men who additionally risk their wealth. Marriages were women earn more are very rare.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/20 11:08 PM
1

I didn't say it wasn't an act of love. I said the person demanding it when they don't have to risk anything themselves cannot use "love" as an argument for the other person to do it.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/20 10:58 PM
1

Idk about that i only know that way over 90% of alimony is paid from male to female divorcees.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/20 10:31 PM
1

Well you are claiming that someone preparing for the worst is always assuming that it's going to happen (in the context of marriage) which is just factually not true and based on nothing. If there was a study showing that the divorce rate between people with prenups is way higher than the regular divorce rate that would be something different, but no such study exists.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/20 10:17 PM
1

preparing for the worst is one thing, constantly worrying about it Lol. You know how often unmarried / pre-nupped men worry about divorce? Never. It's unpre-nupped men who worry about divorce all the time. avoiding things altogether because of it is another What's the problem with avoiding something which provides no benefit to you and just causes risks? assuming that it’s going to happen is definitely having one foot out the door. Preparing ≠ assuming. I just explained exactly that in my commen…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/20 10:03 PM
2

Then why can't people simply do the stuff they wrapped up in marriage in their head without involving the government? Because involving the government will not do anything of the things they think marriage will do to them. It will simply hand out a piece of paper and that's it. Everything else needs to be done by the people in the relationship - and most importantly can be done completely independent from the government anyways.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/20 09:58 PM
1

Emotions ≠ thinking with emotions. Acknowledging that you have emotions and thinking rationally about what you could do to preserve or enhance them is something completely different than beeing a love-drunk retard and just doing whatever the fuck feels good without thinking about the consequences.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/20 09:56 PM
2

That's just stupid. It doesnt matter how much you have, loosing half means loosing half. And if you aren't filthy rich loosing half of what you have is even worse. There are many men who loose their house and have to live in a shitty apartment after the divorce because they have to pay vaginamony and need to save up for retirement again.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/20 09:53 PM
2

if you’re already thinking about the end before it’s even begun, you’ve already got one foot out the door. This is the most retarded argument of all times. If you prepare for the worst that doesn't mean that you expect it, you just want to be prepared. If you put on the safety belt when driving your car that doesn't mean that you expect to have a fatal accident in which you would have died if you weren't wearing it. If you insure your home against natural catastrophes that doesn't mean that you …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/20 09:49 PM
2

So by your logic if someone doesn't earn at least one billion a year it is completely relevant that he looses 50% or even more of his money & stuff?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/20 09:42 PM
1

It would only be an act of love if it was equal for both people. But the person earning more is always risking way more while the person which earns less has a very low risk. If you think about the facts that the lower earning person (in most cases the woman) demands that act of love without making an equally risky act of love it shows that love is not the actual reason and the argument cracks open and reveals itself as the warm pile of dogshit it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/20 09:41 PM
1

He wouldn't. That's the point. The sentence is pointing out that it's a bad idea. How about you post more than just one sentence without any context?
/r/MGTOW04/12/20 09:26 PM
6

You can get a lovely girlfriend to spend your life with which will treat you even better than a wife and can't use the government to take you to the cleaners.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/20 10:07 PM
5

I would love to read the sources you got the idea from that thinking rationally prevents you from beeing happy. Wait? They don't exist? Hhhhm. Who would have thought? Definitely not me. It's not a lies I promise! Just FYI, emotions don't stop existing when you think about them. If you sit down for 10 hours and think about how to have fun and then get up and do whatever you thought of to have fun you will have the exact amount of fun as anyone else, probably even more because you will be hyped up…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/20 10:03 PM
3

I guess you also buy your cars without airbags and safety belts because you "haven't baselessly convinced yourself that accidents happen"?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/20 09:57 PM
2

Relationships aren't the magical disney bullshit you think you are. They can be rationalized like everything else. Just doing things and parroting feel-good disney bullshit instead of thinking rationally is absolutely retarded and always leads to bad outcomes.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/20 09:54 PM
6

You should have answered: "If he is as cool as my girlfriend he won't have a problem with it."
/r/MGTOW02/12/20 12:42 AM
2

Actually, there is a small difference, but it is so small, that it is negligible. A man is an adult human male and a woman is an adult human female and for everyone who doesn't believe in 20069 different genders it's the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/20 12:30 AM
2

Dick Owner*
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/20 12:27 AM
4

I didn't even notice that untill you pointed that out because I really don't give a fuck. Wether I read man or male or woman or female my brain just recognizes it as the same word and goes on about it's day.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/20 12:26 AM
1

The (in)official term is 'dick owner'. Penis haver is not just grammatically wrong, but also sounds stupid.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/20 12:24 AM
2

Who says that man stays the same? The term male is used just as often and I have not even once seen a man upset about it. It's always women who cry about female and say dumb shit like it's "dEhUmAnIzInG1!!1!11!11!!!!". Men see the terms man/male & woman/female for what they are; synonyms.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/20 12:21 AM
10

+1 for that flair
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/20 12:15 AM
1

"Let me make a completely stupid claim and just ignore all sources presented to me." Your thoughts 2 min before making the post.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/20 10:31 PM
8

We don't live in small tribes anymore without medicine anymore. We don't need to replace dead babies and hunters regularly anymore.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/20 06:59 PM
4

Then the fucking also fades
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/20 06:57 PM
3

Yeah didn't you know that? Even if you do it yourself you arr gay. Beeing gay has absolutely nothing to do with beeing attracted to the same sex. It's just fake news.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/20 06:48 PM
3

That video would have been cool, if it wasn't fake.
/r/MGTOW24/11/20 08:19 PM
6

Haha nice Lost In Space reference. I really enjoyed the second season.
/r/MGTOW24/11/20 08:14 PM
3

Not almost. It is an insult.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/20 08:11 PM
1

I don't even know what I posted yesterday and you want me to know everything that I ever posted? For lack of better knowledge, I would say yeah probably. I guess you could find such comments.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/20 10:29 PM
4

And no matter what kind of shitshow you were born into, it’s not going to absolve you of being accountable for your actions. Actually it does. Only those who don't understand human psychology think that self-Reflexion & accountability are somehow default traits and say illogical things like "you are old enough" as if there was a brain region which automatically turns on accountability the day someone turns 18. What it really doesn't absolve you of are the consequences of your actions. Those stay…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/20 07:44 PM
6

If these men were fully grown they wouldn't need to be tought anything. You aren't automatically grown up the day you reach 18/21/whatever number. If someone doesn't know something they simply don't know it. Them beeing a certain age does not influence it in any way.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/20 07:31 PM
1

Information does not magically appear in ones memory. It has to be learned. Your statement is completely nonsensical. The point is that people can't know wether it's safe to cross it if noone tells them.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/20 10:05 PM
6

That argument does nlt support the idea that it's always the man's fault at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/20 09:38 PM
6

That statement also is true the other way around. Women can also decide wether they want to improve themselves and men also can't change how their attraction works. Really lazy attempt of blaming everything on the men.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/20 07:08 PM
3

can’t control urges or stay committed This is exactly what n-count is used to control for.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/20 08:39 PM
2

You’re not warning men of anything. Men have known since the dawn of time that you can’t turn a ho into a housewife. Any proofs to that claim? Because every average person who spends more than 1 millisecond on the internet per day can tell you that today's average man doesnn't know jack shit about women. He is a dumb blue pilled idiot.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/20 08:36 PM
1

If it was really that bad, no one would do it The people who do it have thought patterns like these instead of thinking rationally with proper arguements. "But other people do it, tee-hee" is not a rational argument. Oh and you should never underestimate the stupidity of the average person.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/20 08:24 PM
8

The easiest way to lie is through statistics. The "divorce rate" is by definition not a rate and its rediculous that many sources keep calling it that way. In mathematics a rate is a relationship between two static quantities, not a singular number. And the real rate is not an a 50-year low, it's sky high - as the OC already shared. The only reason the overall number of divorces (which is falsely beeing called a rate) is low, is because the overall number of marriages is low too.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/20 08:17 PM
0

The point is: you know that not everyone should cross it, but most people who cross it don't. Therefore there should be a huge warning sign or it should simply be removed.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/20 08:10 PM
1

How does stating that fact help me he men who are affected by it? 10% is not by any means a low chance.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/20 08:05 PM
1

If these retarded laws keep spreading in more countries cohabitation will be the next thing that hits a record low.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/20 08:03 PM
1

What's TRT?
/r/MGTOW04/11/20 08:02 PM
1

No. Capitalism exists because it works. That's it. Plain and simple. It's not eternal and all-powerful. Nothing is. It is simply way more powerful than communism.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/20 08:50 PM
0

If the set of economical rules in world of warcraft could have been voted on by the players, then yes it would have been (in-game) politics. Well by that logic capitalism is not political because people never got to vote about which system they want to have. I hope you finally understand how inconsistent and just plain illogical your arguments are.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/20 08:27 PM
0

A financial system has nothing to do with politics at all. Or do you want to tell me that the financial ecosystems in complex MMO Games are political? What about crypto currencies? Are those political? Obviously not. Just because economic systems are most of the times talked about in a political context doesn't mean that they are inherently political.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/20 06:29 PM
0

The capitalism itself didn't swallow children either. Economic Concepts are neutral too. If you want to use a certain logic stick to it and don't only use it where it fits your opinion.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/20 05:40 PM
3

Communism is bad economically. It's so bad I'm surprised people ever thought it wasn't the stupidest idea ever. Never underestimate the stupidity of certain people.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/20 05:37 PM
10

There were some bitches crying about it on Twitter but that's it.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/20 11:36 PM
3

Press X to doubt
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/20 06:14 PM
1

What was that again?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/20 06:07 PM
7

The black pill is true. The only difference between the black and the red pill is that red pillers make efforts while blackpillers give up.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/20 06:05 PM
1

lol
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/20 09:23 PM
8

In practice, there's basically no difference between low and high count girls. No. Actually there is a huge difference in personality style between low and high n girls.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/20 04:08 PM
3

!remindme 7 days
/r/MGTOW14/09/20 01:53 AM
29

All people are stupid and naive. It's the default state. Some of us are just fortunate enough to find MGTOW knowledge before doing a huge mistake.
/r/MGTOW14/09/20 01:21 AM
1

Just because you acknowledge that there is no purpose to life and it's inherently useless doesn't mean that you have to be depressed. That there is no purpose to life means that you can do whatever you want. And wasting my time thinking about what will happen after I stopped existing is not what I want to do.
/r/TheRedPill13/09/20 12:02 AM
70

They are really trying their best to completely kill all forms of relationships.
/r/MGTOW11/09/20 01:16 AM
2

Advancing kn your career has way higher chances that winning the lottery. Also you spouse could decide to work less.or completely stop working resulting in you earning more and having to pay when the divorce is gone. Absolutely stupid & naive (sorry not sorry) thought patterns like these are exactly what screws married men over.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/20 01:44 AM
3

Link?
/r/MGTOW09/09/20 01:50 AM
4

ThE pAsT sHoUlDnT mAtTeR!!1!11!1!11!
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/20 12:48 AM
2

Why would men even want women to take the primary caretaker and house maintainer role? It's better if they go to work and financially contribute too. It's better to do a little housework you would have to do if you were single anyways than to risk more than half your shit for a subpar housekeeper who nags you to death. And men don't need a nagging wife to eat healthy and to to the doc regularly. They can do that themselves. No need for marriage.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/20 01:27 AM
13

I have always been the kind of guy who just rage quits a game when it becomes frustrating. I can't stand that shit.
/r/MGTOW31/08/20 12:06 AM
6

Will I ever tell you this to your face? No. I will be a bleeding heart who says you don’t need a man cuz I honestly hope no man is stupid enough to commit to you. I see your friend is a man of culture.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/20 11:54 PM
6

For some it's the exact opposite. We want a society that discourages marriages. Fuck that shit. Men have been brainwashed into fucking up their lives long enough. Time for it to change.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/20 01:49 AM
6

Since we're living in the age of "strong independent" women and the birth rates are plummeting most women in their thirties will not have children in the future.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/20 01:35 AM
3

Simps are too brainwashed to realize that beeing a proud asshole is better than beeing a 'good' mommybear.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/20 01:32 AM
4

It can be anger, irritability, detachment, resignation, anxiety It can even be a mix of multiple of those things or all of them at the same time.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/20 01:16 AM
3

You just agreed with me. Affirmations influence you - subconsciously. And need a very huge number of repetitions. You can't.just.sit.down and decide that you are now attracted to a certain body type.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/20 09:50 PM
3

If it's easy then you surely will not have any problems explaining to me how you did it so that I can do it too. Because I tried it already in the past and it never worked.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/20 07:35 PM
7

You can easily test it yourself. Take two pictures. One of a person you find attractive and one of a person you don't find attractive. Then try to consciously change your attraction so that you find the person you formerly found attractive unattractive and vice versa.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/20 06:45 PM
5

Attraction is entirely subconscious. That it changes over time does not conflict with that fact.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/20 05:52 PM
28

What's more interesting is the fact that 49% of all women 65+ are single
/r/MGTOW23/08/20 10:49 AM
2

What are endorphins and what releases them?
/r/MGTOW22/08/20 08:27 PM
-9

Upset? Lol. You are the one who is writing a rant and downvoting my comment. And no humanity is not a "big ass Chinese whisper game". In a cosmic sense humanity is nothing. It's completely irrelevant. Our existence lasts just a blink of an eye. We have no impact on the universe. Its a lot greater than us. I'm not even gaming pussy. Seems like you have no rational argument and the only thing you are able to say is "pussy is useless hurr durr". No shit Sherlock. Pussy is useless - as is anything e…
/r/TheRedPill22/08/20 03:26 AM
-19

Children. The most common answer. I don't want children so IDGAF what happens to this world after I'm dead.
/r/TheRedPill22/08/20 12:27 AM
-14

An empty platitude does not answer my question.
/r/TheRedPill22/08/20 12:13 AM
-14

Yes, but the important question is why should you, as an individual, care about the decline?
/r/TheRedPill21/08/20 11:58 PM
1

They have meaning, but the meaning is not always clear to everyone.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/20 07:22 PM
27

Us prisons are not about rehabilitation. They are about making money. If prisoner's get rehabilitated and find normal jobs they will not go back to beeing criminal and not be imprisoned again.
/r/MGTOW21/08/20 05:26 PM
1

Depends on the sociosexuality. There is no normal. Some men prioritize casual sex and some prioritize relationships. But for those who do prioritize casual sex it is absolutely normal to have (nearly) no standards for casual sex besides looks. The only pretty common standard is that the chick should not be insufferable personality-wise, but there are plenty of men who don't even care about that and fuck women who are bitchy or annoying or both.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/20 05:23 PM
3

Doesn't make what you said true tho. It is clear to everyone who is not delusional that all men's standards for casual sex are way lower than for relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/20 05:15 PM
1

Context matters. It is extremely y obvious that both OP and the commenter are seeing TRP in the context of the western world were it is supposed to be used.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/20 05:14 PM
2

That's sounds more like french then English. But yeah, I made a typo
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/20 09:35 PM
3

Never underestimate the naivety of young women (and young people on general).
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/20 09:00 PM
1

Not during sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/20 04:18 PM
1

Why would men who earn more want to marry you?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/20 12:52 AM
1

Simp
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/20 04:34 PM
10

How can the judge rule something different from what the jury decides?
/r/MGTOW15/08/20 11:34 AM
1

Lol your just delusional. She is healthy and fit, good for her, she probably has way less health problems than other people her age but she is absolutely not attractive. There is nothing sexually attractive about her.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/20 04:28 PM
4

That's bullshit. Men constantly say that it's the simps own fault for enabling that kind of behaviour and being so stupid as to spend a lot of their money to useless e-thots. I never see men defending simps.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/20 02:40 PM
5

Alphas won't be interested in that. They will just keep using and then discarding women as they already do. Marrying multiple women is nothing they would want. Imagine having to pay alimony not just to one but to four wives. And imagine the nagging of four wives. That's hell.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/20 02:30 PM
0

No they need to start fucking their doctors for free birth control.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/20 10:00 PM
10

Nah, I'm good. I am not interested in dumb cunts.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/20 09:02 PM
18

These dumb cunts simply need to stop spreading their legs for irresponsible idiots and start using contraceptives.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/20 07:25 PM
2

I don't don't that you have ever seen a ragequit, if you think this was one lol. It's funny that you think that I am not going after the stuff I want. And it's even more funny that you are still using shaming language and not providing a single argument. I actually expected you to start hamstering around and giving some more bad arguments.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/20 05:30 PM
5

If you're screening out based on some weird superficial feature That's exactly what happens. Grades are the #1 thing used for screening. If there are too many candidates the applications with the worst grades instantly get disqualified. your internet buddies swear is totally bad with no causal proof It's not internet buddies, it's scientists, and the proof is very clear. It doesn't have to be causal to be valid. That's what you keep repeating over and over again because you have nothing else to …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/20 05:09 PM
1

This
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/20 03:45 PM
4

The causation is the key to the entire screening process. It is not a screening process tho. It's a rejection process. Before you start screening you throw out the candidates with the worst application first because they have the least chance to end up beeing the optimal candidate. Before vetting you throw out the sluts first. It's a very common practice for hr departments. Don't play stupid. You know exactly how and why men do it. Fine, if you’re not going to bother to investigate exactly why c…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/20 03:37 PM
2

The results of other total strangers’ relationships have no influence on my own. That's just shows again that you are stupid and ignorant. Because smart people learn from the mistakes of strangers instead of their own.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/20 03:29 PM
2

Wrong. There correct answer would be you choose none of these two. And I real life that easily possible as there was way more women than just two who are the exact opposite of each other's. These kinds of hypotethical scenarios are completely retarded and absolutely useless.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/20 03:28 PM
4

Instead of getting such a complicated prenup which is still not 100% safe you can just simply not marry at all and be 100% safe. That's way easier.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/20 03:12 PM
1

Bad bot
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/20 03:09 PM
1

You forgot about the infidelity stats. They clearly show that the higher the n-count the more likely that the women will suck another cock.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/20 09:23 PM
1

That's the sad truth.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/20 09:06 PM
1

I understand I think that the mutual benefits are not seen as benefits for you. Oh yes they definitely are. All I am saying is that there is no reason for men to get married as marriage cannot provide a single exclusive benefit. A relationship already provides all mutual benefits a man needs. In an equal partnership neither party benefits from the dissolution of the marriage. Yes your right. But marriages are not equal partnerships. There is a legal power imbalance. Hint:<span class="md-spoiler-…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/20 05:56 PM
1

I should specify: nearly noone who is young is religious these days. Most religious people are boomers. Today's young generations are the least religious people ever - and that's good.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/20 05:04 PM
1

Nothing. I simply do not want to be part of a legal construct which does not provide me any benefit but benefits the other party. Be it a marriage, a job or even just a mobile phone contract.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/20 04:58 PM
2

We don't have any soulmates soulmates don't exist. People who have a 100% compatibility to us are a Disney fairy tale. There are multiple people who have a sufficient compatibility that they are suitable for a long-term relationship. And you can greatly increase the chance to meet these people by simple changing your circumstances. If you move into a bigger city or suburban area you will meet a lot more potential partners.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/20 02:59 PM
2

If you dodge gold digger by going on coffee dates, then you didn't loose anything. Just because there are tons of simple who would pay for a whole vacation to fuck a chick instead of just getting a prostitute doesn't mean that you have to be just like them.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/20 02:54 PM
1

"The one" does not exist. There are millions of "ones" on this planet.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/20 02:52 PM
3

It costs me more then the date in products to get ready If you have so much chemicals in your face that their price exceeds the price of a date, then I would be worried. Also you wouldn't need that much time & effort if you weren't so insecure that you had to hide yourself behind a second skin before meeting up with the man.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/20 02:50 PM
3

Go for a coffee, not for an expensive restaurant. Every guy who takes a woman to an expensive restaurant on the first date is an idiot. Not only are.yoi risking to waste g a lot of money you are also trapped in an extremly boring date.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/20 02:40 PM
2

Bro, stop wasting your time. She had her chance and didn't use it. Don't indulge in Lilith's shittalking.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/20 12:56 PM
5

Include the first part where she tells the lie that marriage provides mutual benefits to both men and women.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/20 11:54 AM
3

As always, you are just dodging the question because you don't like the answer. Very typical for you. We both know that there is not a single exclusive benefit for men, no matter how hard you try to deny it. If you want to keep bullshitting around instead of properly answering just don't respond anymore. There is no need to waste my time.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/20 11:53 AM
8

Church? Lol no! Younger women.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/20 11:39 AM
3

There are no tradcons any more, only chameleons who want men to fulfill the traditional gender role while not doing the same. And nearly noone is religious these days.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/20 11:30 AM
6

Most women are not going to be your forever GF. The ones who will be are not the sweet submissive cater-to-you types. They're most likely "reformed sluts", single moms, or feminists, which is what the manosphere seem to despise. This doesnt answer his question. What do men exclusively get out of marriage? We both know the answer is nothing.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/20 11:29 AM
4

Everything is influenced by upbringing.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/20 06:36 PM
4

No that's the hormones from female birth control pills which don't get filtered out of the recycled piss water.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/20 06:34 PM
7

And once the rage phase is done they start getting more results.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/20 05:38 PM
6

Everyone has a different level of psychological resilience and genetical predisposition to mental health issues. These are things noone can influence. Just because two people grow up in the same way doesn't mean that they are going to end up exactly the same. It's is way more complex.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/20 05:37 PM
29

It's not how your born, it's how your raised. Most if not nearly all major mental health issues stem from trauma inflicted on childhood. How knows how many 'nerds' 'dweebs' 'niceguys' 'introverts' etc. are running around with undiagnosed trauma because there is almost no mental health awareness.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/20 05:33 PM
1

No it's not lazyness, it's irrelevance. TRP is not for outsider. Wether they have enough mental capacity to understand their concepts or not is completely irrelevant to them. It's not their problem of outstanders do not understand easy concepts and don't read the sidebar.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/20 01:21 PM
8

Knowing what kind of huge simp he is I will never be able to enjoy his movies like before anymore.
/r/MGTOW10/08/20 11:53 AM
4

Lol you are really desperately trying to turn your nonsensical post into "RP is bad hurr durr". You didn't oppose their view. You did nothing. What you did is like asking a motorcyclist to explain the operation of an airplane and if he doesn't answer you say "that's exactly what I expected! You can't explain your own hobby!" That's utterly retarded.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/20 11:37 AM
3

Your lack of ability to understand the simplest of simple explanations is astonishing.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/20 11:32 AM
2

AWALT is a generalization, it's not to be taken in a literal way. Not every single woman on earth is actually like that. Also it is directed at straight women alone. The behaviour of lesbian women is not part of AWALT.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/20 11:21 AM
4

They do think about it. But only in a way in which is beneficial to them. Which means only thinking about straight women. And no they don't need to defend anything. TRP is about getting laid not winning debates.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/20 03:27 AM
5

Asking a group about something which is completely irrelevant to them is a waste of time. You will never get an answer. It's not something they think about.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/20 03:14 AM
3

No what AWALT really means is that every single women could be like that, because she is a woman. It doesn't mean every single women will divorce rape you, it means that every single women could. And that you should always be careful and not let your guard down and yes - not trust women. Not with the extremly important things atleast. Getting a prenup/not marrying at all is always better than 'trusting' a woman to not divorce you. They can’t claim it’s somehow a female thing and then ignore the …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/20 03:05 AM
10

I’m saying that because lesbians aren’t essentially different from straight women Lesbians are definitely essentially different from straight women tho. Their sexuality is completely different and that affects their intersexual behaviour. How is that not extremly obvious to you? It’s not all about men all the time TRP is all only about men all the time tho. It's a sub from men for men. Women's perspective is completely irrelevant. They have their own subs. TRP is only about straight men getting …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/20 02:58 AM
3

Abusing obnoxious FDS chicks would be an even better kink than degrading woke feminists. But any interaction with a FDS chick would be a huge waste of time.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/20 02:29 AM
6

of each sex. I’m not asking how lesbians would fit into straight dating, but I’m asking how the claims about female behavior applies to women who don’t date men. It's that easy. Nobody knows because nobody cares and nobody would be able to know anyways. Straight men aren't dating lesbian women, so why would they know how lesbian chicks behave? Makes no sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/20 02:26 AM
5

Predisposed does not mean 100%. Not all women are actually the same. AWALT is just a rule of thumb. A rule to remind you that any woman could screw you over no matter how much of a "good girl" she is. And no generalized statements do not have to explain exceptions, especially if those exceptions are completely irrelevant to the group making the generalizations.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/20 02:22 AM
13

No, it deals with the intersexual dynamics between men and women, not between men and men and not between women and women, only between men and women. It's that easy.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/20 02:16 AM
3

How do pink sapiosexual elephants and flying non-binary monkeys fit into Newton's 3rd Law of Motion? Hint: they don't. They aren't part of the equation.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/20 02:15 AM
3

So because women are stupid and uwaste their SMV for meaningless sex instead relationships all people should not have a free choice and be forced into relationships/marriages? Lol. (Some) women are truly children. They have no personal accountability whatsoever.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/20 07:05 PM
6

You mean when women weren't allowed to work and were forced to extort a man who was forced to work for the rest of his life to provide for the woman?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/20 06:14 PM
1

No, it's both. We want to avoid women with mental health issues and women with high n-counts.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/20 11:21 AM
6

So what?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/20 11:20 AM
2

So your issue is you don’t like two different ideas discussed in one post? No, my issue is that your post is structured in a way which renders it useless. You can't tell me that you didn't realize that by now. Just check the comments, most of them are not addressing the point you intended to talk about at all. If your title is chosen badly or you don't have a good structure your post will not generate useful discussion. That's my point. If you had chosen a better title most people would have agr…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/20 02:44 AM
2

Your title talks about the TRP sub. You claim that it never promises to turn hoes into housewives which is a correct statement. But then you don't talk about TRP in your text body but about people who post on PPD and claim to use TRP tactics on traditional women which is a completely different topic. Your title does not match your text body which is the #1 reason this thread is useless. Plenty of people misinterpreted you and thought you were talking about the TRP sub when you actually aren't.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/20 02:33 AM
6

"oh I'm such a beautiful strong succesful wahmen how dare these men not bow down to my nasty attitude and redicoulous demands and treat me as the high value qween I am, they are just low value boys and not real men and don't know how to treat a catch of a wahmen like me, hurr durr" Sounds familiar?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/20 02:28 AM
1

Congratulations,.you finally understood my comments.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/20 02:20 AM
10

Doesn't matter. The implication is casual sex <--> mental health issues. The direction of the relation is completely irrelevant.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/20 02:18 AM
1

I read it. The text body is not about TRP at all, you are talking about the guys here who claim they can find housewives with TRP tactics, which has nothing to do with your title where you claim that TRP does not promise to turn hoes into housewives - which is a correct claim.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/20 02:16 AM
21

It's always fun to see study after study confirming TRP talking points.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/20 02:10 AM
46

We don’t need studies for this. It’s common sense. Never underestimate the amount of people who do not posess any common sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/20 02:08 AM
9

It’s a common attitude here. Here. This is PPD, not TRP. What the people around here think is not representative of TRP at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/20 02:04 AM
1

No you said the exact opposite - which is the problem. Your title and text body don't match. The claim in your title is completely correct and does not require a CMV. But your text body is different. TRP should not even be part of this post it has nothing to do with it. This is only about the claims of a few people who post here. That's so irrelevant, that's not worth a post.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/20 02:02 AM
2

Not only did it never promise that it turns a hoe into a housewife, it even explicitly says to never try to turn a hoe into a housewife because that's impossible. This thread is completely useless. It's based on the statements of random redditors in this sub who are not representative of the whole TRP sub. If you want to know what TRP promises and what not simply read the sidebar.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/20 01:57 AM
10

So you think 3 random redditors are representative of the whole TRP sub? Just lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/20 01:50 AM
1

Yeah but in western countries there are very many women with blonde hair, more than in all other countries. Way more than 2%
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/20 11:58 PM
3

If she had a shot she wouldn't have to rant about it like little kid online lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/20 11:57 PM
1

And a welding station.
/r/MGTOW07/08/20 01:05 PM
2

The question is why would you have to do that to feel better? Who says that you should feel bad for beeing shallow? That's retarded. Shallowness is completely normal. There is no need to add a negative connotation to 'shallowness' for some false sense of morality. Someone is not a good or bad person for beeing or not beeing shallow.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/20 03:30 PM
4

Try saying that to the judge who orders that you pay child support.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/20 12:18 PM
1

No need for this bullshit if men can simply keep their stuff. The greatest power a man has is to walk away. If you need to rape a woman to have sex you have no power at all.
/r/MGTOW05/08/20 06:50 PM
1

Dont worry, since men are marrying and getting children at a lower rate every year, there will be less fat divorced 40 year old dudes in the future and the exception will become the rule.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/20 03:20 PM
1

The as you call it was referring to the other commenter. He told him that there is no "truth", which is false.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/20 09:28 PM
12

Not only is he causing drama he is risking his job. His boss is not an idiot. He will instantly know that it was him who told the women that he made more than them.
/r/MGTOW04/08/20 09:20 PM
7

He just needs to fuck the chick from his gym and tell the wife about it. She will close the relationship instantly.
/r/MGTOW04/08/20 09:08 PM
1

Isn't the answer extremly obvious? SPOILER:yes
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/20 05:14 PM
3

Yeah, only one of them is an adjective.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/20 05:12 PM
5

Yeah the Chad thing is funny as a meme but it's annoying when people constantly comment that the only way to get chicks is to be a "giga Chad"
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/20 05:07 PM
3

But not autistic enough to properly use "autistic".
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/20 05:05 PM
2

Don't worry, you will always hold your traditional position as most gay mod of PPD.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/20 05:03 PM
9

I am pretty sure your comment will also just he declared as incel content and you will be banned for disagreeing with her.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/20 04:59 PM
4

There is no "truth" as you call it. There are individual lives and vast amounts of experiences. Spoken like the typical bluepiller. There is absolutely an objective truth. Most people just don't want to see the cold hard truth and start saying dumb shit like this. "There is not truth. Everything is subjective." But I agree on the first part tho. Many people really need to leave their echo chambers. They are completely fixated on on perspective and never notice the other perspectives. You cannot …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/20 04:56 PM
1

you think men who have been to young, thin, good looking hookers are incapable of loving their wives? Yes definitely. If these hookers have been way better options than their wives, then it will absolutely affect the relationship. It would be foolish to think, that only women are affected by this.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/20 04:39 PM
4

Read both comments again. Pair bonding is never once mentioned. It's about the kind of partners you can attract at higher vs. lower levels of commitment. Women commonly think shit like "I could have done better." In their head when this king about their husbands. Hypergamy is a hell of a drug. And the more, and the better partners a woman had at low levels of commitment e.g. casual sex the more likely she is to not appreciate/be attracted/love her partner. The opposite is true for men because th…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/20 04:34 PM
2

Women don't want relationships with average Joe. Obviously it's the men women want to have relationships with who are the gatekeepers.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/20 12:13 PM
-1

Women hold the leverage when it comes to sex, not to relationships. Men are the gatekeepers of relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/20 12:06 AM
5

What do you expect from a society mainly made out of NPCs?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/20 12:05 AM
11

Wasn't there a study saying that marriage statisfaction for both partners goes down if the woman earns more than 40% of the combined household income?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/20 11:56 PM
3

Men are the gatekeepers of commitment after all, even tho many women do not want to believe it.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/20 03:54 AM
4

Multiple partners results in mental health issues? Or people with mental health issues have more partners? Doesn't matter, the result is the same. How does the human brain recognize "hey this is a different dick than the last one That's very easy. Different people look differently. What do you think how the brain recognizes different people? Sniffing their ass? Lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/20 03:33 AM
1

I never said that they are ruining their lives. I simply said that the majority of men are not interested in relationships or let alone marriage with women who do porn or have a very high n-count. That's it. Men commonly break up with their girlfriends after learning about the past that the woman tried to hide from them, be it porn or sexual partners. It's no rarity. And obviously in huge cities you will find more people who have the same opinion as you, as there are generally more people. But t…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/20 06:10 PM
1

You are misunderstanding something right now. You are actually agreeing with me. I never said that everyone will think like that. I made a clear destinction between the genders, used the word "most" and even presented an exception. Yes obviously there will always be people on both sides. But what I am saying is that most men will always be in the bubble which is against it while most women will be in the bubble which is for it. It's that simple. The girls which are on onlyfans are taking in mone…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/20 05:21 PM
1

Yeah but you are forgetting one thing. Most of the people who promote that stuff and call it empowering are women, not men. Yes obviously there are also a few neckbeards calling onlyfans thots queens and uploading screenshots of them donating thousands of dollars to them, but most men do not do that. Most men would never date a chick with an onlyfans account and no matter how much women preach to themselves that it shouldn't matter, it will always matter. Just as body count will always matter. E…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/20 05:06 PM
8

Cheating is not an issue tho. It's not comparable to "the hawt guy from the bar rejected me, why did he do that? Do I look weird with the new makeup?" vs. "that hot chick probably just has a bf and rejected me because of that". It's not about an issue. It's about personal responsibility. And women tend to be a lot more allergic to personal responsibility than men. Whatever happened it's always someone else's fault.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/20 01:58 PM
3

As I said. The middle aged people who have swallowed the feminist pill will live in their bubble and accept it. But their views will not influence a lot of other people. The young kids will insult the cam-girls son in school with the terms they have seen on tik tok & the 60 year old neighbor will think of the women as a slut for having done porn in the past.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/20 01:49 PM
5

I don't see which demographics should become open about it, even in 10 years. Old people 50+? Definetly a no. Young people -20? I really doubt that. Red pilled concepts & slut shaming are flowing into the young mainstream through meme culture & TikTok. The only group were there will be plenty of people open about it are middle aged college graduates who have been fed that it's okay and empowering everyday in their university classes. And that's absolutely not the majority of people.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/20 01:42 PM
3

The more women who do it, the lessened the stigma will become over time. The current events do not agree with that. Since OnlySimps blew up the stigma did get even greater.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/20 01:36 PM
1

Because the judges aren't neutral
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/20 10:08 PM
17

No the best bet is not to marry. Because prenups can get thrown out in court. But if you aren't married you don't need to worry about that.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/20 07:58 PM
15

This advice doesn't help all those men who already married a chick which makes less than them.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/20 07:58 PM
2

They do. But vasectomies can be reversed even a decade after they have been done.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/20 11:48 AM
6

Cuz your not a chick I want to fuck and this is a debate sub.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/20 10:08 PM
5

"Everyone who needs the red pill is an autist reeeeee!!1!1!1!!1!1!1!!1!1!1!" I hope that you realize that all of the things explained in the post are done by everyone in some.ppont of their lives. I learned early to simply not explain myself but there are enough people pleasers around who think they owe everyone an explanation.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/20 09:42 PM
5

Not even DNA tests provide 100% probability. You are delusional if you trust her that much.
/r/MGTOW31/07/20 12:04 AM
5

Play stupid games, win stupid prizes. Don't waste your time with couples therapy or some shit. She will want to drag your there. But it's useless. Nothing can remove those memories from your head.
/r/MGTOW31/07/20 12:03 AM
3

Depends on how far the person is from beeing at the ideal height/weight. A woman could definitely deal with a man beeing shorter than she prefers it if there is great chemistry and a man could do the same with weight. But it the man is very short or the woman is very overweight then chemistry doesn't help.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/20 07:35 PM
6

Since school does not do a single thing to educate people on important life topics, it will stay like that. Dumb & poor people will keep producing fucked up kids and the amount of well off kids will keep shrinking.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/20 04:36 PM
1

Good for you. That's not how most men think tho. Most men don't even think that porn is bad. Kinda sad.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/20 01:28 PM
10

They won’t complain that they can’t find a perfect man to suit their sometimes unreasonable standards and are usually attractive in both looks and personality themselves. Hahahahaha. They complain about men just as much as men complain about women on MGTOW. They keep posting things men do and titling them "LVM something something" all the time. And if you observe how some of the posters look on the pictures on their profiles and what they comment, then you realize that they are not attractive. N…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/20 10:47 AM
2

get a pilots license Nice. UL or PPL? Wait. Do you even need a license to fly UL in the US? Which plane do you want to get?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/20 10:43 AM
-1

No it's true that almost every man watches porn. Scientists wanted to do a study about men who don't watch porn once and had to cancel it because they didn't find enough men who don't watch porn. The amount of men who don't watch porn, is extremly small. Most men watch porn atleast a few times per week.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/20 10:40 AM
4

Nothing is wrong with it. But you have to use it properly. You are wasting your time when you are applying masculine frame to a mentally unstable chick you don't want to fuck anymore anyways. Doing so does not only not provide a single benefit to you,. it could even cause unwanted consequences. It is completely illogical.
/r/TheRedPill29/07/20 10:01 PM
2

A man does what is rational. He thinks with his head. Don't let your ego trick you into doing things which are not a good idea. Enduring the trouble and headache of breaking up with a mentally unstable chick is not worth the false sense of pride you get from calling yourself a "real man".
/r/TheRedPill29/07/20 09:51 PM
13

It's sad that he even has to ask wether that's abuse or not when it's clear af.
/r/TheRedPill29/07/20 08:54 PM
5

These things make coercion not seem that bad. (True) coercion is bad. There are just plenty of idiots who keep washing down the definition of words untill they mean nothing.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/20 04:42 PM
3

When the probability is 80% then we can easily conclude that most women are definitely not fine.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/20 09:04 PM
1

Ik that you mean the fruit. That's the point. You would need a box for every single fruit.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/20 01:12 AM
5

The amount of guys who get screwed over in divorce is way higher than 1 in a million tho.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/20 12:35 AM
9

Who gives a fuck what some insta thot does?
/r/MGTOW28/07/20 12:25 AM
1

I don't think that that would work that well. Also it's not economical to have tens of thousands of boxes on my plantation.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/20 12:23 AM
1

What makes you think that a guy who knows that OLD is a waste of time would waste his time there?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/20 12:14 AM
1

I wish there were cubic tomatoes, which perfectly fit on a sandwich.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/20 11:18 PM
9

its going to be interesting how these single ladies will behave once that reality sets in. Corporate jobs, wine and cats
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/20 04:38 PM
1

The thing is, there are not a lot of men who matter for 50 year old women.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/20 11:22 AM
1

The thing is women aren't attracted to beggars. Any women who thinks that her dating pool will not shrink extremely as she gets older is delusional.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/20 07:18 PM
14

People with (heavy) unresolved traumas are unsuited for relationships and therefore 'damaged goods'. That should be common sense. If you want a functioning relationship picking someone who is severely depressed, has BPD, PTSD, or whatever is a very bad idea. It will just be a waste of time and also take a toll on your mental health.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/20 04:57 PM
1

Judging by the huge amount of women who believe that they can still be sexually desirable when they are older this does not seem to be something that all women know already.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/20 03:50 PM
11

Some people are just bitter jealous incels who demand everything goes their way. Lol. Says the bitter chick who keeps whining about men not wanting to commit to sluts. You can throw tantrums all you want, that will never change men's aversion to sluts and beeing settled on.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/20 03:03 PM
9

"muh maturity hurr durr" No sweetie, that's called AF/BB
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/20 02:31 PM
0

Young people yes. But most older people who are divorced, or had a long LTR which didn't work out, aren't interested in relationships anymore.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/20 11:56 AM
0

Who is talking about long term relationships? Most of these men already had one and aren't interested in a new relationship once they get older.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/20 10:57 AM
0

Find one attractive and actually want to date them are two different things. Find one attractive and actually want be able to date them are two different things. If these men were able to date significantly younger, they would.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/20 10:23 AM
1

It isn't. It's just that women don't want to admit it.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/20 10:17 AM
0

The fact that older women, still struggle on OLD where they have the ratio advantage, says a lot. Most of them cannot even get matches if they don't use a fake age.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/20 10:17 AM
-1

And men prefer women significantly younger than them when they are in the 40-60 age range and we'll of. These men do not date women slightly younger than them. They date women 10 years younger than them. 40-60 is the worst age range for women. They have the least options when they are that old. Divorced guys, fat guys,.not financially established guys, etc. There are no unmarried, attractive guys for 40-60 year women. These women have no chance with them. These 40-50 men are dating mainly in the…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/20 10:14 AM
4

Ik. She gave me ammo, by saying that she is ugly, so I used that to troll her back.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/20 01:31 AM
4

Ugliness can't be watered down. Ugly genes ruin good genes and make them worthless.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/20 12:07 AM
1

Pussy which is attached to a bad women, or pussy which is too dry, or too loose.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/20 11:09 PM
6

Yes obviously lol, it's self-evident for men. It's women who don't understand that just because a guy uses them as a cum dumpster that doesn't mean that he is interested in a relationship with them. That's how it was in the past. I was explaining the biological imperative. The true Red Pillers aren't crying. They are using female sexuality to their advantage. The current state of the SMP allows them to fuck women left and right without providing any commitment. Those who are bitching about it ar…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/20 11:08 PM
14

Men are programmed to fuck. They don't care about the ugly chicks or the potential kid. A nut is a nut. Who they just it in is not that important. Men do not have to invest a lot in reproduction, remember? They only need to spread their seed. Women csnt.do that. Getting pregnant is always a huge risk for them. But men also only invest in women who have good genes, which means looking good. Those women get commitment and protection because their kids are more important than the others. If some, o…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/20 10:47 PM
2

"all pussy is good pussy" only applies to needy guys, there certainly is bad pussy
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/20 10:41 PM
1

Stop it! Please don't post so many arguments at once. /s
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/20 10:37 PM
28

By that logic you would have to not want to have kids as you would pass on your ugly genes to your kids. Chad genes aren't magical. They cannot negate the effect of ugly genes. Therefore it's most logical that Chad's only reproduce with Stacie's, which is what is happening. They may be pumping and dumping ugly girls, but they will never find them worthy enough for reproduction.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/20 10:34 PM
16

it’s partly due to latent homophobia Exactly this. What's even more interesting is that in LGBTQwjdhfkshdj accepting countries displays of affection between male friends is less prevelant that in countries which are not. For example in Syria men casually hold hands and noone cares but if men were to do that in western countries it would result in them loosing social status and SMV due to people thinking that they were gay.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/20 09:02 PM
1

The consent of human females is not needed. Some politicians already tried banning them by using the law which prevents dolls which look like children but all sex dolls are very clearly depections of adult females so that doesn't work. The law won't do shit. Firstly because the dolls/bots aren't illegal and because companies will prevent new laws by lobbying once they get a taste of the money which is going to be made in that industry.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/20 08:59 PM
4

Working is not the same as fighting. Plenty of men who never entered a gym in their lives could easily win against women who workout. Men have a natural strength advantage.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/20 07:10 PM
2

Lack of masculinity.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/20 04:44 PM
5

There is a difference between wanting a relationship and having one. Just because you decide fast that you want a LTR with a chick doesn't mean that you will marry the chick on the spot. You just know that you want it. If the chick shows red flags you will still disqualify her.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/20 04:39 PM
1

No, in cases like these it simply needs to be neutral.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/20 03:06 PM
1

I don't expect the world to be how it's not, I take it the way it is. It's no surprise that people on the internet tend to have a short attention span. Especially if they see a very opinionated title and assume that the text body will just get into the details but hold the same opinion. If you want as much useful interaction as possible on your posts you need to take the nature of the internet into account. Saying "they shouldn't be here then" will not change the fact that many people didn't rea…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/20 03:04 PM
9

Sexbots don't need to replicate humans, they simply need to move like humans so that they look realistic during masturbation.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/20 02:05 PM
14

You don't understand how technology evolves. The more advanced a society is the faster it advances even more. In a couple hundred years we will have a lot more than just motorized plastic dolls. We already have functioning humanoid robots, and pretty realistic looking dolls. Programmers and engineers just need to optimize the movement of the robot so that it looks like it's human. That wont take hundreds of years.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/20 01:25 PM
1

Yes if the chick is not that attractive it can make a huge difference. For example if the chick has a butterface, just mascara and eyeshadow alone can make her look way better. If she also has acne and hides it with the cheek stuff, it can make her look even better.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/20 11:43 AM
1

You made a claim which is wrong in your title and then write a long post body which doesn't fit the title and everyone ignored cuz they're lazy. If you make posts like these you need to carefully choose the title. Because in many cases it's the only thing people read. If you want them to read a long text body make the title neutral.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/20 11:41 AM
12

He was an idiot, he should have simply ignored her and her friends u till she came crawling back. Texting her and worse, apologizing to her was stupid, because the woman will take the apology as him beeing wrong and continue to dress like that.
/r/MGTOW24/07/20 11:23 AM
10

Seems like you have never met a plain or ugly girl with makeup skills yet. The difference between makeup and no makeup in some women is night and day. So much that you don't recognize these women when you see them without it for the first time.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/20 10:01 PM
1

He never said that sex is bad because if nature. He said that sex is bad because if the effects it has on neurotransmitters. Big difference. But you weren't interested in hearing his explanation which is scientifically proven btw. But you don't care. You started brabbling about nature and "muh scientists are wrong hurr durr" instead of actually providing a valid counterargument.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/20 05:47 PM
2

That's why you don't commit to normal women. Yeah we learned that there is no point in having a relationship with a woman like that. A relationship is more than just sexual attraction. If you have to suppress all your emotions infront of a plate thats fine, but if you can't show any emotion infront of your wife, then you married the wrong person. Your better of without commitment then. If you don't like the rules of the game, the only winning love is not to play.
/r/TheRedPill23/07/20 05:30 PM
2

coping with jerking off and playing games This is definitely a shaming attempt. Pretty weak tho as you have no idea how my life looks. And yes, you are doing the same thing by marking me as a creep when i check your post history The kind of people who snoop around other users post history on reddit are always the same. I will check your post history and from what i see, you jerk off, post images on MGTOW of other subreddit posts Yep and that's all I do. And those are extremly horrible things wor…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/20 01:54 PM
2

I guess you didn't hear the phrase "Enjoy the decline." yet.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/20 01:43 PM
3

As I already told you, trying to use shaming language doesn't work on me. That you creep into people's posting history just confirms to me what I already thought. You have absolutely no logical argument to come up against MGTOW philosophy and opt for shaming people because that's the only thing you are able to. Oh and btw MGTOW includes RP. Everyone who is MGTOW is also red pilled, you can't be MGTOW without beeing red pilled.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/20 01:33 PM
1

I did explain it, I didn't ignore your question. I just informed you that convincing a MGTOW that marriage is good is not possible. It's literally the core part of the philosophy. then shouldn't we give into our subconscious desires (power, hunger, sex etc.) for they communicate to us what we don't understand. Yes statisfying our urges to get as much positive emotions as possible can be a way to live. But the problem with hedonism is that it is focused on only the present and often leads to a pa…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/20 01:25 PM
5

The purpose of r/MGTOW is to be a place for new members to learn about the topic and vent. You should look up optimistic nihilism. Life has no meaning, yes. But that means you can give it any meaning you want. And humans are surviving because it's in our nature. We have a survival drive. If we hadn't everyone would be commiting suicide. You mistake is assuming that marriage makes men happy. MGTOWs know better. They have seen countless of times with their own eyes what kind of a shitshow marriage…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/20 11:21 AM
12

Oh living a selfish life absolutely does make you happy. It's way better than playing captain save a hoe without getting anything in return. People pleasers don't win, they loose. It's the selfish people who win in life.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/20 11:09 AM
45

Low self esteem would be wifing up degenerate leftover women.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/20 11:07 AM
6

Who says that they are hiding? They aren't hiding from women, they are avoiding them. Which answers your question. They don't want to deal with women. It's that easy. And yes a live lived avoiding what you don't want is absolutely a life worth living. Your mistake is assuming that MGTOW men care about your opinion. They don't. Just because you think a relationship is necessary for life to be worth living does not mean that they also think that.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/20 11:05 AM
4

No, it's assuming that the roads are fucked up and will screw you over in atleast 50% of the times you drive.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/20 11:02 AM
1

Yes most people nowadays are alcoholics - literally. Everyone who drinks regularly, like every weekend, is by definition an alcoholic and I am sure that a good portion of people who drink a lot on weekends would not be able to stop regularly drinking.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/20 03:20 AM
12

No wonder you meet so many men who only want sex from you. If you vet for experienced men it's no wonder you meet plenty who are only after casual sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/20 11:08 PM
3

A relationship is only a compliment to your life, not the center. If you need to compromise.on other things like hobbies, it's not a good relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/20 11:07 PM
4

No, it's not about the feeling of the pussy. Only the orgasm. Sometimes it just feels weird or uncomfortable. And it happens when masturbating also.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/20 11:03 PM
3

You can't know how an orgasm is going to be untill you have it.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/20 11:02 PM
3

Women are not owners of pussies. Yes they are. And men are dick owners. You dehumanize You can't dehumanize something which isn't human. A pussy is not a human, it's a thing, or are arguing otherwise? Women don’t think that having a pussy gets a relationship. There are women who absolutely do think that just because they have sex with a man that that would be enough to secure a relationship. They are spending time with that person and talking and interacting and feel that her personality and com…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/20 11:01 PM
5

It's not just 'not super enjoyable'. It can be very uncomfortable.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/20 10:54 PM
1

But I am more trying to learn what men think than asking about a specific situation. Then frame your post that way. Don't make misleading posts where you contradict yourself. I get this. The most common reason, in my experience, is actually that he has a secret girlfriend he went back to. Yes that happens but it's defined not the most common reason. It's what I said. The man simply is not interested in anything besides sex, as that's the only thing he enjoys with that woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/20 10:51 PM
2

For me knowledge, life experiences, health, hobbies.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/20 10:49 PM
3

Wtf?! Idon't care about my mom's pussy. I am not interested at all in that. Yes she is a human. And I don't think you understand what I said. I didn't say that women are pussies and not humans, I said that pussies don't make them human. A pussy is a sexual organ, it's a thing. Owning a thing does not make you human. And women who think that owning a vagina should be enough to get a relationship are retarded and dehumanizing themselves and men should avoid them like the plague. guys think of wome…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/20 10:48 PM
1

If I'm sleeping with him, I want a relationship with him. You aren't tho. Sexless do not even get sex. It's a no-brainer that they also don't get relationships. We are asking the same question, then. No we aren't. You asked why do men not want relationships with women they sleep with. But they in your post body and plenty of comments you added that they not also sleep with the woman but that he also enjoys spending time with her, and that she has a good personality. My question is rethorical, yo…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/20 10:42 PM
4

Lol. If you really think that's the most important thing to spend your time.on, then that's just sad.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/20 10:29 PM
4

If that would make them happy, they would do it. But it doesn't and that's why they don't do it.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/20 10:27 PM
1

Noone said that. They said "guys stick around". Sticking around doesn't mean commiting. It simply.means coming back for the sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/20 10:26 PM
4

There are wise old men who have better things to do with their time and there are creeps who never had sex with a young hot women and still try it when they are older instead of doing better things.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/20 10:25 PM
6

You can always rent women. Just the price increases. When you are 20 you may be able to fuck hot young women for free, when you 50 you could still do it, you would simply have to pay for it. But most men who are 50 do not care that much about sex anymore anyways.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/20 10:21 PM
5

But so few do. 40% of men are sexless. These men are not the ones turning down women they are sleeping with. They are needy as fuck and would probably put up with a relationship just for mediocre sex. But they are not attractive enough. Women dont want relationships with these men. Many, many men in relationships are unhappy sexually. Another reason men don't just jump into relationships. If you have good sex with a woman, and she is an enthusiastic partner, I guess it doesn't seem like from wha…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/20 10:19 PM
5

It's very easy: if you rent nice things you don't need to take care of them. You don't need to buy and manage the whole theme park to have fun riding a rollercoaster. You can simply buy a ticket, enjoy the ride and then leave the park without worrying about taking care of it. Just as you don't have to buy a sportscar and pay for it's gas, maintenance and insurance to drive it. You can simply rent it for a day and have your fun with it. Same for women. You don't need to have a relationship to hav…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/20 10:14 PM
6

It's not the biggest thing on the list. Looks & Sex alone is simply not enough for a relationship. Every single woman on this planet can provide sex. It's nothing special. It doesn't make you better than other woman and is not a reason to commit to you at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/20 10:08 PM
16

I wouldn't waste my time w a man unless I wanted something. It's the same for men. Let's use this logic on the men you are describing in your post: They want something: sex. They don't want to waste their time: they do not enter a relationship or even date you as that is time not spent having sex. Do you understand it now?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/20 10:05 PM
4

Yes, obviously. A pussy is not a human. Is it really that hard to understand why simply having a sexual organ is not enough to be considered for a relationship?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/20 10:02 PM
6

I guess it's just hard to believe you have fun with someone for a night and are intimate/vulnerable and he is just waiting for you to leave You better believe it, because it's true for plenty of men. Also Sex does not always translate into intimacy & vulnerability for men, not even for women. There are people for whom sex is intertwined strongly with intimacy and there are people where it's not. Most people who have a lot of casual sex are in the latter category.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/20 10:01 PM
11

Men want to ride the porn rollercoaster for 10 minutes and clean their dick and hands afterwards. They don't want to pay and care for it for years to come. You really have no idea what women need to be desirable for commitment.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/20 09:57 PM
9

The list is a lot longer than one tho. Is that so hard to understand? Beeing fuckable is not enough for men to want to commit to a woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/20 09:54 PM
3

Depends on how good her other qualities are. If she only had looks to offer, or.oicked a guy who only cared about looks, then she has a problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/20 09:52 PM
2

It's funny that it's more often than not women who don't understand that.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/20 09:44 PM
2

No, but he (and any reasonable man) expects a woman which is attractive in the present and still will be for atleast many years to come.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/20 09:42 PM
7

Yeah that part was just facepalm. "Why doesn't a guy who has sex with a woman and likes her in all other aspects want to meet her again?" He wants to. If he doesn't want to meet you again that means he doesn't like you in any aspect besides sex, or not even that.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/20 09:41 PM
22

So getting any kind of male attention has no promise that he physically or mentally has any feelings for you other than he thinks he could tolerate you for 20 minutes? Yes. What made you think that male attention translates in to the desire to get to know your or persue a relationship with you in the first place lol? What's your advice for women to vet men out who aren't interested in them as a person? Don't suck his dick untill he knows your last name. At least you get to have an orgasm. So wha…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/20 09:38 PM
1

Lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/20 09:34 PM
1

Reason 1: social status. Noone wants to be the guy who is seen with the fattie, the fugly or the village bicycle. It makes other men respect him less and other women categorize him as a low SMV guy regardless of his actual SMV (pre-selection). I guess the minimum standard for most guys is a plane jane. Anything below is not someone they would be open to dating. Reason 2: they are simply not that attracted to them. There is a huge difference between sex and a relationship, especially if a man is …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/20 09:28 PM
73

OPs problem is not his wife attacking him for showing emotions by grieving over his dead child. His problem is that he still wants to support that dumb narcissistic bitch instead of instantly divorcing her ass.
/r/TheRedPill22/07/20 08:28 PM
11

Yep there are quite a lot of red pillers which are retarded in one way or another.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/20 08:19 PM
54

I don't know from whom it was, but once I saw a red pill video which opened my eyes. It explained how "asshole" and a few other "insults" are actually the best compliments a woman could give you and beeing called "nice" is not a compliment and not something you would want to her from a woman.
/r/MGTOW22/07/20 03:16 PM
2

I am talking about banning the same person for the 10+the time
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/20 07:48 PM
15

Someone who calls knowledge "dumb shit" is the real dumb shit.
/r/MGTOW21/07/20 07:44 PM
2

I thought banning Incels for the 10th time was your favorite way to use your free time?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/20 07:42 PM
7

I think the biggest problem with TRP is that it leads many men to believe that spinning plates is the end goal. They keep rambling on about "purpose" and "don't make women a priority in your life" but do the exact opposite. By spending an excess amount of time and effort on getting women thry are making them a priority, putting their pussy on a pedestal as u/DangZagnut would say. If you fuck a few women without much effort on the side that's fine, but obsessing over it like some of the pussy whi…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/20 01:04 PM
22

Yep most MGTOW men have never heard the term MGTOW even once in their lives. The men who are on reddit or YouTube are the minority.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/20 12:59 PM
1

"pretty rare"?? Lol, take a visit to the nearest divorce or family court and ask the men around there how often it happens.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/20 11:48 PM
2

It's funny how many people don't understand that and keep coming up with nonsensical hypothetical question like this.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/20 11:41 PM
1

Anyways my bullshit tolerance is at an all time low, I'd take neither I feel u.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/20 11:39 PM
-1

but it's not a badly intentioned thing. Maybe not at first. But the woman you divorce is not the woman you marry. Every divorced man can tell you that. Women do not treat you like they did when they loved you when they divorce you. They want to screw you over. And if they don't, their lawyers convince them because they know how much money they can make through it.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/20 11:23 PM
2

I would say the ratio should be somewhere around 80/20 or 90/10. Yeah that doesn't happen in real life. Personality is somewhat attractive, too. A 6 with an attractive personality is better than an 8 with an unattractive personality. Absolutely. That's what 60/40 means. Personality>Looks But 90/10 doesn't happen. Men do not get into relationships with unattractive women. If a man cares that much about your appearance as 60/40 or even higher in the attraction scale, what's to stop him from ditchi…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/20 05:59 PM
1

Noone said that women should stop doing what brings them self-worth. That would be retarded.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/20 05:11 PM
1

Noone claimed otherwise.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/20 05:10 PM
1

So you think that only a man who minimally cares about a woman's attractiveness would be loyal?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/20 05:07 PM
3

You are the one who doesn't know the difference. You used 'sentence' in one comment and 'line' in another one. Seems like you can't differentiate between the two. Whatever, this conversation is getting annoying anyways.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/20 04:09 PM
1

Why do you women never understand the meaning of the term 'and/both' The world is not black and white, it's grey. It's not EITHER/OR, it's BOTH. Personality alone is not enough, just as sexuality alone is not enough. To be a good relationship prospect a woman needs sexuality AND personality. It's that simple. Most men value personality a little more than sexuality in LTR prospects, probably around 60/40. 100/0 doesn't exist. And thinking that is delusional. And thinking that every man who values…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/20 04:07 PM
0

Again, what's your point? How is this related to my comment?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/20 03:50 PM
1

they'll learn to filter out and avoid men who see them this way. You don't understand. All men are them this way. Accomplishments are simply not sexually attractive. Thats biology. Men are not programmed to find accomplishments sexually attractive in women. You can't filter out men who think like that. It's impossible. There are no men who think otherwise.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/20 03:47 PM
0

And? What's your point?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/20 03:45 PM
0

Nowhere did imply that women are only valuable as sexual partners. I said that the traits which make women valuable as sexual partners are not the same as those who make them valuable as persons. That's it. Stop twisting my worlds. Women many people of both genders think that beeing valuable as a person should be enough. But it's not. Niceguys and nicegirls loose. You need to be both; A good person AND sexually attractive. Only beeing a good person is not enough. Beeing a good person is not some…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/20 03:44 PM
4

I am not sure which sentence you were talking about, that's the reason I told you to quote it. to find the fourth line This is exactly the point. In your original comment your said fourth sentence, not fourth line. That's a huge difference. I wasn't sure what you meant, therefore I asked. But instead of just specifying which sentence you meant, you complained about beeing unable to handle a simple text editor on mobile.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/20 01:02 PM
0

You can quote on mobile just as easy as on PC. Just highlight the part your are referring to and press 'quote' on the pop-up.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/20 12:44 PM
3

Simply quote the sentence you are referring to.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/20 12:13 PM
45

I dont mean you. I mean the moron who commented on your post.
/r/MGTOW20/07/20 11:22 AM
90

Why do so many idiots think it's black and white. It's not either looks or personality, it's both.
/r/MGTOW20/07/20 11:18 AM
-3

You try so hard to emulate men that you end up failing at being a man, and because you don't bother being feminine, you also fail at being a woman... and now you end up becoming neither. 💯 Excellent line.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/20 10:59 AM
-1

If that's true, women aren't valuable to men as people. No, you don't understand. It's exactly the opposite. The things you listed make you valuable as a person and valuable to yourself. But they do NOT make you valuable as a sexual partner. That's the point. What women value in partners is not the same as what men value in partners. And no amount of bitching and moaning is going to ever change that.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/20 10:58 AM
-1

Reality is insulting. Get over it. You can't decide what the rules of the game are. If you don't like them, stop playing. You will never be able to change what men find attractive in women and what not.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/20 10:54 AM
24

No, that's not what OP said. He simply said that those things do not make you sexually attractive to men. That's it. You don't need those things to get a man. He didn't say that you shouldn't do this things. If you want to do these things for yourself, great. Just don't think that they make you attractive. Too many 30+ year old women think saying that they are intelligent & have a great job would make them attractive to men.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/20 10:53 AM
2

None. If my choices are bad, I simply pick nothing.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/20 10:26 PM
4

That's a question you should ask the people who keep making up these nonsensical hypothetical scenarios.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/20 10:26 PM
3

Lol. It's always funny when people ask for data and then ignore or deflect it afterwards, but doing so upfront, that's new. If you aren't interested in data which doesn't fit your false narrative, don't waste people's time asking for it.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/20 10:23 PM
2

Who says that you love her? That's not part of the question. You are just married to her, that's it.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/20 10:20 PM
1

How about you mash all those pieces of brabbling together and form a coherent sentence where you explain in great detail what the fuck you are talking about. Your comments make absolutely no sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/20 06:16 PM
1

But she didn't do it as a petty way to respond to the rejection, but to justify that he should promote her to girlfriend status.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/20 06:10 PM
2

But she didn't do it as a petty way to respond to the rejection, but to justify that he should promote her to girlfriend status.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/20 06:10 PM
2

It'a possible, but much more likely that ve just accepted the crazy in exchange for sex. Oh definitely. She's hurt at losing you, and feeling rejected. She's not crazy That's not what made her crazy. It was the delusional comment about simps on her social media.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/20 06:03 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter