TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ConfirmedCynic Archive

View 9 posts and 1,186 comments by ConfirmedCynic on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 1,186 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Yeah, it always struck me as just a woman who is obsessed with baseball. I mean, it's right in the song's first line.
/r/MensRights20/07/26 03:46 PM
1

Can't the man hire a lawyer to pursue charges?
/r/MensRights02/02/26 05:34 PM
0

"Funny" isn't the world I'd choose for it. But AI is coming in as a huge wild card, so who knows what will end up happening. Islam is another wild card; if it takes over eventually, things will get different for women.
/r/MensRights02/02/26 05:31 PM
1

All you can really do is look for a better situation, either by transferring or finding a job elsewhere. Or subtly encourage her to transfer.
/r/MensRights02/02/26 05:27 PM
-1

Places like Sweden refuse to collect demographics information and then people like you say "there is no evidence".
/r/MensRights27/10/25 03:23 PM
6

The teacher got really mad after that. That's what people do when they don't have a good answer and they know it.
/r/MensRights09/10/24 10:52 AM
22

Too many of them are.
/r/MensRights07/10/24 08:04 AM
1

Well, with the way the world is going, most will probably be serfs, but the handful of guys at the top will do just fine. As will the criminals, I suppose.
/r/MensRights10/08/24 12:30 AM
31

I think they wish the 60% would just disappear. That they'd be busy working like gnomes underground to support the infrastructure women enjoy, but go unseen. I also think women would bring back gladiatorial games if they could.
/r/MensRights09/08/24 03:34 PM
3

If a man is in a forest and says something, and there's no woman there to hear it, is he still wrong?
/r/MensRights27/07/24 09:40 AM
2

In principle, it isn't, but when it overrules merit, it downright stinks.
/r/MensRights25/07/24 10:07 AM
2

"They" are clearly starting to break Japanese society down with feminism and migration, just as they've done in the West.
/r/MensRights20/07/24 06:13 AM
5

https://x.com/DaveAtherton20/status/1790659579921027312 Sums it up.
/r/MensRights15/07/24 11:10 PM
23

You could argue that nearly every invention in the world was an attempt by men to stop women from complaining lol It didn't work.
/r/MensRights10/07/24 04:05 AM
0

So, bros, go out there and get that money. Work, educate yourselves, improve yourselves, be competitive and aim higher at the corporate ladder. Only for feminists to start screaming about patriarchy and men being promoted instead of women? And do you really want to spend your life working like a dog just to avoid a woman's irrational action?
/r/MensRights09/07/24 05:50 AM
3

Wow, they really splurged, didn't they.
/r/MensRights15/06/24 09:38 PM
15

Given how war seems to be shifting to remote operation of drones, maybe women should step up.
/r/MensRights15/06/24 04:57 AM
4

Well, I guess these women really want Islam to take control, because it seems they're gutting their own men as best they can for that to happen.
/r/MensRights14/06/24 10:44 PM
2

Well, the left has already succeeded in breaking Japan's refusal to accommodate mass immigration. So why not complete the destruction?
/r/MensRights22/04/24 11:52 PM
3

Calling someone fit is sexual harassment now?
/r/MensRights03/04/24 06:27 PM
6

Right, and thus we have TV shows proclaiming "men are useless" and feminist manifestos of how all men should be killed or reduced to 10% and prominent statements like "a woman needs a man like a fish needs a bicycle" and courts that are totally biased against men and complete blindness to any area where women have the advantage. Not against men at all.
/r/MensRights25/03/24 07:58 PM
4

Typical leftist, you take what was said and twist it into a pretzel to come up with something you can attack with.
/r/MensRights25/03/24 12:12 AM
2

Because women are perfect and any criticism must be misogyny. /s
/r/MensRights24/03/24 07:45 PM
7

Asteroid to destroy the Earth! Women most affected!
/r/MensRights18/03/24 09:17 PM
0

Huh, that's the first time I've been called a feminist for (1) saying that mothers caring for kids and family is not "non-productive", and (2) saying that many if not nearly all women would be happier staying at home than grinding at a soulless job.
/r/MensRights09/03/24 05:54 PM
-11

Wow, the arrogance of trying to tell us that being there for their children, raising them, and caring for the family was "non-productive". But I'm sure all that mattered all that time was that she instead be grinding her life away in some office for some company that will discard her as soon as it better profits them to do so, working hard to make some member of the elite ever wealthier.
/r/MensRights08/03/24 11:48 PM
40

How long until they legalize polygamy? I wouldn't be surprised if women would prefer to have to share among the top men rather than marry down.
/r/MensRights02/03/24 01:30 AM
9

It still is just another way men are isolated now.
/r/MensRights24/02/24 06:39 PM
13

If men acted like women, what marriage could possibly last?
/r/MensRights25/01/24 03:34 PM
1

By keeping busy. Volunteering and trying to serve the world helps too.
/r/MensRights06/01/24 11:49 PM
1

Interesting hypothesis. How does it work when the confidence doesn't match up with the performance though? Say you act all confident on the way to the ski hill, and then end up snowplowing down bunny runs, for example?
/r/MensRights03/01/24 02:22 AM
2

You know what's the same? Any criticism of women being declared to be "women hating". Right from the start it's been that way. I guess you truly believe that women and modern social trends are nothing less that perfect in every aspect and any criticism could only arise from envy and hate.
/r/MensRights27/11/23 04:50 PM
1

Did you ever read about the White Feather movement?
/r/MensRights27/11/23 04:48 PM
2

I’m a vet. I’ve found that they care as much as men do. Sure, for cats, lol. They're like surrogate babies to the women.
/r/MensRights27/11/23 04:44 PM
9

Specific women programs. Yes, you just can't find anything for men in college, for example, even now that women make up nearly two thirds of the students (i.e. outnumber men nearly two to one), but you can still find plenty of scholarships for women only and the like. Where is the equality in that? Where are the feminists who are interested in equality? They don't care when things work in their favor. They don't care about equality at all, they just press for more advantages. Why should we liste…
/r/MensRights22/11/23 03:42 PM
2

Supposedly you can't be racist/sexist if you don't have power (a statement I find ridiculous, but anyhow). Women don't seem to perceive how much power they already have. Almost two for each male in universities. Dominate professions such as medicine now. Populate the government, HR departments, and the media. And yet it's never enough to displace the "patriarchy". They simply won't stop until men are disadvantaged in every single arena, save maybe for the "yuck" trades like garbage collection. M…
/r/MensRights03/11/23 02:54 PM
1

Not only that, but when a tech company achieves some sort of notable success, the group photos invariably have whatever diversity they can find in the group pushed to the front and center. Doesn't matter if it's 99% male, from the photos you'd think women did it all.
/r/MensRights01/11/23 05:12 AM
2

Wonder what these tiny women think when inevitably their own sons are less than giants.
/r/MensRights01/11/23 05:04 AM
2

Where are the other women stepping in to police these women then?
/r/MensRights01/11/23 05:02 AM
0

Strong armed how?
/r/MensRights27/10/23 03:13 PM
1

What can you do? If companies faced true competition, inefficient practices would result in them going bankrupt and being eliminated. Instead, in an era of heavy corporate consolidation and oligopolies, effective monopolies even, they can just continue on with this sort of thing.
/r/MensRights21/10/23 09:09 PM
12

Just reflects life at large, doesn't it? Women are willing to make things miserable forever until they get what they want, men aren't.
/r/MensRights21/10/23 08:42 PM
4

In my experience those events are 90% male anyway This is a good point, actually. If it were only held one time. But since there have been many over the years, a pattern can emerge.
/r/MensRights21/10/23 12:44 AM
5

Remember Hillary? "Women have always been the primary victims of war." Society simply values women far more than men.
/r/MensRights19/10/23 08:46 PM
0

Whatever they're paying that guy, it isn't enough.
/r/MensRights22/07/20 06:30 PM
5

The thing is that this sort of environment is very new to the species. Up until a few thousand years ago, tribes were very small, life spans were short, knowledge was only passed on vocally, and so on. An entirely different dynamic than we have today. We're just noticing behaviors that worked well for the species in the past when there really was very little room for philosophizing.
/r/TheRedPill30/10/15 12:29 AM
2

I see the Red Pill as sort of like living in Stalinist Russia. Instead of identifying problems and talking about how things could be made better and getting kind of pissy in the process (Mensrights) or just passively resisting by saying "fuck it, I'll pretend to work so long as they pretend to pay me" (MGTOW), the Red Pill is all about how to optimize one's chances and satisfaction within the context of a flawed system, embracing it instead of trying to change it. They're all just ways of coping…
/r/TheRedPill27/10/15 03:27 AM
3

In a nutshell, they have no honor, nor even feel a need for being honorable.
/r/TheRedPill26/10/15 12:15 AM
4

It's hard to say if the west with it's feminized man babies of dwindling testosterone and intelligence will get the better or worse of it. Did U.S. soldiers fight like feminized man babies in Iraq and Afghanistan?
/r/TheRedPill25/10/15 07:59 PM
1

"I got so drunk again last night.. hur hur hur" "No way man" "Did you see the game last night? The Sox totally owned them" "Britney Spears is so hot. Did you hear she shaved her head?" You can keep your "socially astute" conversation. It's as boring to some people as their attempts to talk about cosmology or ancient Egypt are to you. The only answer is to find people who like the things you do and hang with them. There is more to life that talking about smart subjects and the fact that you are m…
/r/TheRedPill19/10/15 09:08 PM
2

Doesn't matter. You're using this as an excuse. There are more men than you that are genius level and don't have the success they want with women, and in order to save face in their mind deem it that they are just superior to those women and men. What it actually comes down to (and what a lot of the personality types like you realize) is not everything valuable is based on smarts, especially given that some smarts just aren't valued. True enough. The bottom line though is that he finds it diffic…
/r/TheRedPill19/10/15 07:01 AM
3

"Man up" seems to be code for "assume the responsibility for someone else's shit".
/r/TheRedPill18/10/15 06:55 PM
59

Three weeks ago, after seeing a girl I knew from high school buy her 3rd property with her husband, it felt like my relationship with Will was juvenile and had no future. You don't need three properties to raise a family, and this is what triggered her to break up.
/r/TheRedPill13/10/15 05:47 PM
1

Three weeks ago, after seeing a girl I knew from high school buy her 3rd property with her husband, it felt like my relationship with Will was juvenile and had no future. This seems telling by itself. Status, status, status. She wants to be able to brag to her friends. I loved him and his personality, but I felt he lacked career/life ambition and we wanted different things for the future. Love just isn't enough for a woman.
/r/TheRedPill13/10/15 05:40 PM
2

Number 2, 4 and 5 - This all sounds like the beginnings of some tin-foil hat conspiracy nonsense. http://qz.com/399531/denmark-hopes-to-boost-its-economy-by-eliminating-cash/ http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-04-10/citi-economist-says-it-might-be-time-to-abolish-cash http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2015/05/why-the-powers-that-be-are-pushing-a-cashless-society.html http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2014/06/the-technocrats-who-want-to-take-your-cash-away/372322/ This is definite…
/r/TheRedPill11/10/15 01:36 AM
31

They don't care about Brent as a person, they care about his status. If Brent was injured and started sitting around home moping, he'd be dropped like a hot potato.
/r/TheRedPill01/10/15 12:47 AM
-2

I'm not going to descend into that philosophical shit pit. Without noble traits, like compassion, honor and altruism, men and women are just fucking animals. The fact that we've been able to build up a complex, interdependent society is evidence that there's more than "every man for himself".
/r/TheRedPill18/09/15 03:30 AM
13

I don't know why it's so hard for men and women to recognize that there are good people and shitty people on both sides. Probably because of laws backing toxic behavior on the part of women these days and the prevalence of the pussy pass in the courts. Things are not even the way you imply.
/r/MensRights17/09/15 12:03 AM
4

Yeah. We're not all Jack Reacher.
/r/TheRedPill15/09/15 01:15 AM
2

There are actual movements in some countries advocating that women should not be imprisoned for anything. Men, of course, are disposable as always.
/r/TheRedPill07/09/15 12:55 PM
1

The thing is they're not "shitty" unless you decide that female bullshit is the only standard to measure a man by.
/r/TheRedPill25/08/15 05:26 AM
3

So don't be stupid beta who believes in fairness. Civilization has been built out of beta fairness to and willingness to cooperate with other men. The good alphas lead wisely and enable the betas; the bad ones put nations to the sword, plunder and ruin civilizations. The "take what you want" philosophy tends to land you in that "plunder and ruin" category. Elon Musk offers his minions a chance to make a difference and improve the world, which appeals strongly to many betas. Sure, a lot of them c…
/r/TheRedPill20/08/15 08:16 PM
12

Yes, it's already happening in China with their so-called "leftover women". The top women can't find mates because, despite the surplus of men there in general, too few are good enough to suit their hypergamy. http://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-21320560
/r/MensRights17/08/15 03:30 AM
4

More like promoting a fantasy. Pity the women who fall for it and think they'll be able to do the same.
/r/MensRights16/08/15 12:53 PM
2

No guarantee it goes to the kids too. There should be some verification at least.
/r/MensRights16/08/15 01:23 AM
2

Clearly the problem is with the system ordering a set amount a year for someone working in an industry where year to year income can vary wildly and dry stretches can occur.
/r/MensRights16/08/15 01:18 AM
5

Men do deserve better than they get from the family courts, from the school system which treats boys like defective girls, from the media which treats everything male as either villainous or bumbling foolishness one-upped by women every time, from the "justice system" that ruins men just upon an accusation, and from women who divorce so readily because they've been taught all their lives they only have to take in relationships and not give in them, that they have no responsibility, only rights. …
/r/MensRights15/08/15 07:52 AM
9

Let's face it, it would be political suicide if he did, which would help no one. Mens Rights has not achieved enough acceptance yet.
/r/MensRights14/08/15 01:41 AM
0

I've wondered more than once if a modern home should consist of two parts: the woman's part and a small, separate man cave. Let the woman fret over every little detail on her own, and let the man relax in his cave without being constantly harassed over meaningless issues.
/r/MensRights13/08/15 05:54 AM
18

The whole reason that her threat of saying she was raped is very much a serious, dangerous threat is due to policies and laws that have been put in place as a result of feminist advocacy.
/r/MensRights13/08/15 05:04 AM
1

The lawyers are just loving this business all the way to the bank.
/r/MensRights11/08/15 12:39 PM
10

Another conundrum: if two women get drunk and then have sex with each other (say using toys), who has raped whom?
/r/MensRights11/08/15 04:45 AM
3

So more heavily biased, statistically flawed "studies" to be waved at people.
/r/MensRights11/08/15 03:38 AM
0

How did he manage to get appointed? Amazing.
/r/MensRights10/08/15 11:50 PM
3

Does anyone else see this sort of thing as just the very beginning? Anti-white hatred is becoming open and mainstream. Things are going to get pretty nasty as whites become a minority in the U.S.
/r/MensRights07/08/15 03:54 PM
2

If the women are mixed with the men in combat roles, kiss effectiveness goodbye.
/r/MensRights06/08/15 08:16 PM
2

After decades of doing little or nothing to address the epidemic of domestic violence that has plagued the state Feminist "statistics" at work.
/r/MensRights06/08/15 06:18 AM
6

Everywhere I've worked, it's the guys putting in the long hours and the women who are gone by 4 pm.
/r/MensRights06/08/15 06:14 AM
6

I wouldn't count on that. We're starting to move into a society where women often earn more than men. And it just freaks them out when they're the ones faced with paying. Look for change as it becomes increasingly common.
/r/TheRedPill05/08/15 05:57 AM
10

Well, we have one foot out of the jungle at the very least. The laws should be changed so that alimony doesn't last forever. Women supposedly are all "strong and independent" after all, capable of earning their own livings, unlike in years past where they were shut out of most careers.
/r/TheRedPill05/08/15 03:48 AM
8

Well, look at it from the beta male's viewpoint. What does he offer? He'll treat her well. Importantly, he'll give her children a stable home and be a good father to them. He'll pay for their college. Isn't that what she wants compared to some loser (in his perception) who might spend half his life in jail? The problem is he's being logical. Apparently Cupcake really would rather have Chad's love child, be abandoned by him, and raise the kid fatherless, with the state paying for her upkeep inste…
/r/TheRedPill05/08/15 02:49 AM
39

And somehow these women convince themselves that they deserve it.
/r/TheRedPill05/08/15 02:39 AM
1

It's because he's not primal enough. Succinct and true. But civilization has been built by beta men. If women only want to breed with alphas and just use betas as ATMs and cuckolds, what does it say for the future? Back to swords and serfs.
/r/TheRedPill05/08/15 02:35 AM
6

AC hiccups and the mercury hits 80? The entire HR department will bail en masse. I like the way you think. AC "incidents".. hmm.
/r/TheRedPill04/08/15 02:38 AM
47

Once you adopt a mental model of women being like this, why would you even want to be with one? If they're so mercenary, constantly calculating and recalculating, and you have to deform your own personality to press the buttons, where is the appeal? Don't you just feel disgusted? Is sex by itself really enough?
/r/TheRedPill03/08/15 09:32 PM
4

the Nordic model Yeah, "the man is always to blame" model. Feminists just love it because once again it implies women don't have any agency.
/r/MensRights02/08/15 02:59 AM
2

(seriously though; if that's such a big deal, get a urinal and explain to any guests how you're an adult in 2015 who has relationship issues around toilet seats) Genius! Why don't home bathrooms offer a urinal alcove along with a toilet?
/r/MensRights01/08/15 09:45 PM
2

Good, as long as they match the number of parking spots to the ratio of the genders at the place. Less door dings and mysterious dents and bent fenders for the men. But of course we know that the women will be free to park where the men park, just not the reverse. And probably they'll finagle their reserved spots to be strangely wider too. As well as being closest to the entrance. If female washrooms vs. male washrooms are any indication.
/r/MensRights01/08/15 12:27 AM
2

Well, at least watch how she treats her parents and family members. Watch how she treats any subordinates at her work. That's a good sign of how you'll fare once you're a few years in.
/r/MensRights30/07/15 04:29 AM
6

Thanks for the warning, and I hope it reaches a few ears and deters some who would otherwise enter the trap with honorable intentions. Unfortunately you can't reach everyone, so they're certain to find a few fools to ambush and portray as badly as possible, including through misleading editing of the interviews.
/r/MensRights30/07/15 03:18 AM
14

No kidding, why wouldn't all the men be sending out resumes as fast as they could?
/r/MensRights29/07/15 06:51 AM
10

There's a morbid fascination in watching just how far the pendulum can swing. Almost looks like it's going to just keep going until the kookoo clock is destroyed.
/r/MensRights29/07/15 02:11 AM
1

Yeah, keep telling yourself that when you or some male relative gets screwed in the family courts or when some woman falsely accuses you of rape in college or bothering her at work and you get the boot without anything resembling a fair hearing.
/r/MensRights28/07/15 06:22 AM
4

Frankly, most people look better with clothes on. Let's keep it that way. Plus there's the issue of sharing seats. No one wants to sit where someone, male or female, just peeled themselves off.
/r/MensRights28/07/15 02:50 AM
3

Do you even understand what hypergamy is? Go read about it. Read about China's "leftover women", they're a good example. And read about men going their own way. I'm not going to write a thesis for you here.
/r/MensRights27/07/15 11:00 PM
2

25 women and not one was a keeper?
/r/MensRights27/07/15 05:33 PM
10

A woman doesn't owe a man a sex life. Women not giving a large fraction of men a sex life leads to a highly dysfunctional society. Basically, why should those men even bother to contribute any more than they need to live at a low but comfortable level? We're seeing a lot of this now with female hypergamy, marriage rates dropping and men going their own way.
/r/MensRights27/07/15 05:26 PM
8

A history of posting here first is good enough.
/r/MensRights26/07/15 10:43 PM
9

You want to take single nutjobs and use them as the face of a group? Here are some nutjobs for you: "I claim that rape exists any time sexual intercourse occurs when it has not been initiated by the woman, out of her own genuine affection and desire." -- Robin Morgan "To call a man an animal is to flatter him; he's a machine, a walking *****." -- Valerie Solanas, Authoress of the SCUM Manifesto "The male is a domestic animal which, if treated with firmness...can be trained to do most things." --…
/r/MensRights26/07/15 03:46 AM
5

Actually this is false, what feminists truly want is for all the 'unattractive' men to shove off and disappear from the face of the earth Not quite. They should disappear but continue to toil away obscurely, paying taxes and maintaining infrastructure for the benefit of women. After all, these women need cars to drive in and roads to drive on and office buildings to "work" in and phones on which to complain to each other how shitty men are.
/r/MensRights23/07/15 08:25 PM
1

For which the writer of this article labels them "infantilized" and "playing it safe", as though a "real man" would say nuts to the odds, get married and have children.
/r/MensRights21/07/15 03:23 AM
12

This infantilisation has taken hold. Men are suspending indefinitely the idea of moving in with a partner, getting married and starting a family, preferring the safe option of living with parents instead. I detest this sort of mealy-mouthed wording. Oh, the coward babies are just playing it "safe" instead of doing the only reasonable thing to be done under the circumstances.
/r/MensRights20/07/15 06:31 PM
3

We've long known about the "Team Women" thing.
/r/MensRights20/07/15 05:58 PM
1

"I support equality of opportunity".
/r/MensRights20/07/15 05:37 PM
9

The problem is the unhappier they make themselves, the worse they'll become. The more they'll ratchet up the bullshit and transferring of blame.
/r/MensRights20/07/15 10:25 AM
1

Maybe it's a good move for his progeny then. Not only sacrifice his pride to stay with the kids but also not fight in front of them constantly with his "wife". Still would suck to be him, though.
/r/MensRights19/07/15 10:28 PM
7

She'll bear some other guys' children, he'll raise them, and his genes will drop out of the gene pool.
/r/MensRights19/07/15 08:09 PM
2

There's no feeling of accomplishment if they don't concede, unfortunately.
/r/MensRights19/07/15 08:06 PM
1

Are you sure? You won't get them to admit to anything in the argument itself, but you can plant a seed of doubt in their minds. At least with the ones where logic kicks in to some extent after the defensiveness subsides.
/r/MensRights19/07/15 08:02 PM
1

Mr. Elliot isn't, though. Who knows if his pockets are deep enough.
/r/MensRights19/07/15 07:02 AM
1

The race of fools is infinite. --Simonides of Ceos
/r/MensRights19/07/15 02:20 AM
2

Ok, was that a male or a female? If you listen to movies, televisions series and so on, which is what a lot of people form some subconcious ideas of the world from, it's a woman. Not only is it a woman, but she pointedly puts down, commands, and out thinks every man around her. Sometimes it's an old, old professor, but he's almost dead from age, so he's effectively emasculated.
/r/MensRights19/07/15 01:17 AM
4

I liked what someone posted in another thread. If two drunk women have sex with each other, who has assaulted whom?
/r/MensRights18/07/15 07:24 PM
6

Sure, if you have endless money to spend on lawyers.
/r/MensRights18/07/15 06:55 AM
1

Bring an ass-kicking female bodyguard along is the only thing that comes to mind.
/r/MensRights17/07/15 05:34 PM
2

There's no point in getting worked up now. We'll have to hear what the judge says in October. Hopefully something scathing to the prosecutor and the accusers. Disappointing that it wasn't just dismissed out of hand.
/r/MensRights16/07/15 03:47 AM
7

I hope UCSD will have to pay through the nose in penalties. A hit against their bottom line is all that will get their attention.
/r/MensRights16/07/15 03:42 AM
4

He should launch a countersuit for what they did and said.
/r/MensRights16/07/15 03:20 AM
1

If there's bitterness here, I suspect it's more from those who were screwed over in the divorce courts than anything else.
/r/MensRights14/07/15 02:23 AM
9

He did teach you something, just probably not what he intended.
/r/MensRights12/07/15 04:06 PM
1

It might have the welcome side effect of discouraging cheating too.
/r/MensRights12/07/15 02:17 AM
3

In other words, you're crying "misogyny"!
/r/MensRights11/07/15 06:29 PM
3

If you had ever tried to discuss mens rights issues with a feminist, you'd recognize this cartoon as a factual representation.
/r/MensRights11/07/15 06:29 PM
5

I suspect they'd somehow manage to make all the murders committed by the woman the fault of some man, but I know what you mean here.
/r/MensRights11/07/15 01:35 AM
28

She argued that men getting raped in prison is less important than woman getting raped outside of prison. So she thinks women are more important and valuable than men, and is therefore not seeking equality. She's sexist.
/r/MensRights10/07/15 06:49 PM
8

Aren't we always being told how females mature faster than males too?
/r/MensRights09/07/15 06:52 PM
6

100% of women prosecuted for false allegation get convicted Wow... they must only prosecute when the evidence is slapping them across the face.
/r/MensRights09/07/15 04:01 PM
2

Yes, they do.
/r/MensRights08/07/15 08:33 PM
2

Call it "everything means no".
/r/MensRights08/07/15 08:32 PM
8

The internet makes becoming a hermit much more bearable.
/r/MensRights07/07/15 10:30 PM
10

The article describes this as a 'hypothetical situation'.. i.e. it didn't actually happen (yet).
/r/MensRights07/07/15 09:21 PM
2

Laws that are punished based on how it makes you feel are not justice. Laws need to provide some sort of deterrence against breaking them. The more serious the offence, the more serious the deterrence. Would you support handing out community service to someone who repeatedly beat a woman? Would you support it for a serial murderer? I don't think you understand the magnitude of the crime of a false accusation; she literally tried to destroy his life. Stop seeing only the woman in this.
/r/MensRights07/07/15 04:45 PM
3

Sounds an awful lot like you're defending this pitiful excuse of a sentence to me.
/r/MensRights07/07/15 02:17 AM
4

A false accuser tries to deliberately put her victim into jail for many years, and more broadly to destroy his economic prospects and reputation for life. Surely justice demands that she be punished at least in some proportion to what she tried to do to him, instead of encouraging more of the same with trivial sentences like this one.
/r/MensRights07/07/15 02:13 AM
2

Maybe they should have to wear the symbol of a forked tongue in public to let others know they are false accusers.
/r/MensRights07/07/15 02:09 AM
7

Only answer to all this whining is to make a country for women alone. Send these sorts there to build their perfect society; after all, every "single last problem is the fault of men". Watch them find out differently in short order. Hopefully they'd return with a better appreciation for us.
/r/MensRights06/07/15 04:20 AM
1

They NEED the emotional group support more than they need the problem to be fixed. How did we ever survive as a species?
/r/MensRights05/07/15 07:24 AM
15

But women would prefer sympathy to solutions. To me, this is like someone sitting in a mud puddle and complaining about having a wet ass. Why the heck would they want to keeping on sitting in it and not only wasting their time but someone else's complaining, when they can just get the heck up and change pants?
/r/MensRights04/07/15 07:29 PM
3

Seems to me that a lot of feminism is about being terrified. Of that guy who dares to say "hello" on the elevator. Of that guy walking on the same sidewalk. Of "guy spaces" simply existing. And whining endlessly about it. But in the typical feminist fashion, if it's a man at the receiving end, it must be a good thing? Evil hypocrites.
/r/MensRights03/07/15 03:35 AM
1

So whose DNA was on her underwear, and why don't you suspect that person instead of just assuming this guy is guilty?
/r/MensRights03/07/15 02:05 AM
2

Plant some weed in her desk and leave an anonymous tip with HR. (Just kidding).
/r/MensRights01/07/15 09:20 PM
10

Someone made a good point that the next generations of lawyers are being indoctrinated on campus with this crap now. And will try to push it into the general public as their careers mature.
/r/MensRights01/07/15 12:24 AM
4

From Alpha Women, Beta Men: “He never spent money that wasn’t his in an extravagant way,” she says while taking therapeutic sips of a Sea Breeze at Tribeca Grill on a recent evening. “But by not helping, he was freeloading.” She felt unable to confront him. “We were really dysfunctional,” she admits. “We acted as if we were a two-income family. He was in denial, and I was sort of protecting him. He’d pay for groceries. He was running up credit-card debt to make it appear he had more money.” “He …
/r/MensRights30/06/15 03:52 AM
2

The problem is that society, and women themselves, have been telling him that that's what she wants (the whole "sensitive, caring men who listen" thing), and then she blows him off with "I'm not ready for a relationship right now" and he sees her the next day on the arm of some dominant, insensitive asshole. Naturally this is a huge shock to him and he ends up feeling deceived and cheated. The way to prevent this is to get the message to guys early about the true nature of women, so he understan…
/r/MensRights29/06/15 09:11 PM
7

When other feminists publicly disown them. Hasn't happened, has it?
/r/MensRights28/06/15 07:13 PM
3

But one night, left in the care of their grandparents, it happened again. "This time she didn't want to do it and had tried to stop it at one point but was told by my son that 'no, you've got to wait for the good bit'."
/r/MensRights28/06/15 07:20 AM
1

I.e. most people learn only from their own mistakes.
/r/MensRights27/06/15 04:14 PM
2

They love to attack any positive male figure, don't they.
/r/MensRights27/06/15 02:46 PM
2

The mall owner probably put that sign there exactly because women kept complaining.
/r/MensRights25/06/15 05:33 PM
1

So men will withdraw from society even more as knowledge of this percolates through.
/r/MensRights25/06/15 08:11 AM
1

It seems to me they want to create a society in which all women have access to the top men, for purpose of producing children at least, and the vast majority of unwanted men toil away out of sight to support them.
/r/MensRights24/06/15 05:36 PM
1

And when the 80 places are filled? Might as well just say "open season, ladies"!
/r/MensRights23/06/15 06:07 AM
5

I wish there were a means by which we could vote to eject people like this from society.
/r/MensRights18/06/15 08:58 PM
28

I wonder what the underlying agenda is here. Are they trying to drive men away from attending college?
/r/MensRights16/06/15 03:07 PM
2

I don't think anyone is claiming that all male elementary school teachers face nasty situations, but enough do to give men considering such a career grave pause. Or at least those men who aren't oblivious to the potential problems anyhow.
/r/MensRights12/06/15 06:24 PM
1

I'd say that, while offensive, there's a kernel of truth here. Science requires criticism and skepticism, yet women (in general) take criticism very personally. Picture a conversation like this: Man: You don't have enough replicates to reach this conclusion. Woman thinks: Why is he attacking me?? Misogynist! An exaggeration, but illustrates the point.
/r/MensRights11/06/15 02:40 AM
2

I'm all for more women dominated movies Why? Do you like the rank dishonesty of them? Like some slip of a girl kicking the asses of every man around her, some who outweigh her three to one, every time? The way Hollywood always makes them right and the men working with them idiots (this latest "Mad Max" is a good example)? The constant tone of moral superiority? The way they do whatever the fuck they want and are still supported?
/r/MensRights09/06/15 11:43 PM
1

Intelligence is not granted, by society or anyone else; it's innate. Therefore it can't be a privilege, unless you're going to argue that it's granted by God.
/r/MensRights07/06/15 02:11 AM
20

And as an MIT professor, he is very privileged Just what are the MIT professor's "privileges" anyhow? Pay? Recognition in his field? A certain respect for his position? Wouldn't you say he's earned these by being smart and driven enough to become a professor at MIT?? Or do feminists just honestly believe he got there by treading on women and black people, that everyone just moves aside for him on the sidewalk and that he always sits in the front row at a theater, or something? What does "privile…
/r/MensRights06/06/15 04:46 PM
1

Maybe they shouldn't fucking make the seats the size of childrens' asses then.
/r/MensRights06/06/15 01:11 AM
5

For a lot of these "nice guys" extended adolescence is irrelevant anyway. They lack the social skills and basic awareness of women as worthwhile individuals, not just potential sex toys, to ever hope to have romantic relationships. What's sad is that all it would take is a few fucks to clear the "losers'" (admit it, that's what women think) minds, allow them to realize that sex isn't everything, and to give them more of a sense of social value. I.e. set them well on the path to maturing into wha…
/r/MensRights04/06/15 11:15 PM
9

The idea that men are penalized for being nice is just arrogant bullshit from men who refuse to acknowledge the real reasons that women don't have any genuine desire for them. The bottom line is that women are the choosers and yet feminism does nothing to acknowledge the enormous imbalance of power that favors women in this regard. It's infuriatingly one-sided and unreasonable of them to just go on an on about "patriarchy" and never once admit they hold most of the cards now. It's also maddening…
/r/MensRights04/06/15 05:25 PM
-2

Prostitution is not always legal, there are a lot of places where men can literally be arrested and charged for paying for any kind of sex On the other hand, there are places where it's legal, and usually nothing to prevent men from vacationing there.
/r/MensRights04/06/15 05:21 PM
10

"Meanwhile, please sign this consent form. Yes, there are fifty signature lines. You'll have to sign it continuously while we have sex".
/r/MensRights03/06/15 01:54 PM
1

One that is so secure in its superior position that it can just dismiss such things? Or so they'll probably say.
/r/MensRights02/06/15 10:07 PM
2

It's not only women.
/r/MensRights28/05/15 01:22 AM
5

Ah well, hopefully if they get too out of line, they'll tank at the box office. I'm pretty sure the money motive will triumph over the propaganda motive. But who knows, there might be enough sad male specimens to prop them up even as movies become ever more misandrist, so long as there are a few explosions and boobs.
/r/MensRights27/05/15 05:37 PM
7

Feminism in part is a means by which husbandless women can fulfill their need to nag and control a man.
/r/MensRights25/05/15 06:17 PM
0

You're going to miss the best movie in years It sounds about as entertaining as "Ass" (from Idiocracy), with a matriarchy thrown in. Women good, men bad or incompetent. No Mad Max here.
/r/MensRights19/05/15 12:55 PM
1

So basically it's a female revenge fantasy on evil men?
/r/MensRights18/05/15 02:23 PM
2

Well put.
/r/MensRights10/05/15 10:18 PM
1

So let's not give men any credit for anything they do and do nothing but highlight the accomplishments of women, regardless of how few or many they are, because women are all that fucking matter. 1 woman in a team of 100? She's the one the paper does an article about. 100 people died, including 5 women!! Notice the emphasis there. But let's sure run men down in any way we can. That's how society operates now, but it doesn't make it right. We don't celebrate or acknowledge men's accomplishments o…
/r/MensRights10/05/15 01:32 PM
1

Tell me what the ratio of men working to women working on it is.
/r/MensRights10/05/15 01:14 AM
2

Let's face it: if we build Mars into an inhabitable world, it will mostly be done by men, because most women just don't care. Men will do the dreaming. Men will do the inventing. Men will do the forming of companies and raising of funds. Men will do the flying. Men will do the building. And men will do the dying. And just like all the other frontiers, the women will follow after men have done all of this and change things to suit themselves. But that's not enough for these types. They want to st…
/r/MensRights09/05/15 11:06 PM
3

She actually saw you as a human being with characteristics of your own instead of just projecting. Congratulations.
/r/MensRights08/05/15 11:33 AM
5

I figure their working definition of misogyny is "anything contrary to female supremacy".
/r/MensRights07/05/15 06:40 PM
53

In North America, he'd soon be paying child support.
/r/MensRights07/05/15 06:38 PM
39

It makes sense that men should have to wait on women because women are slower? If processing women faster is really so important, why don't they just build extra stalls for them.
/r/MensRights07/05/15 11:54 AM
15

So what are they marrying, the house or the man?
/r/MensRights05/05/15 07:23 PM
3

Some months after the incident, a new ruling came into force that all those in the emergency services, fire, police, ambulance in other words, who'd attended the fire had to see a counsellor to 'talk through' any possible trauma that might result from the gruesome work they had had to do that day. So now they're forced to do it, are they? The psychiatrists/psychologists have really succeeded in attaching themselves like squids to any tragedy. Or maybe it's just lawyers trying to avoid lawsuits.
/r/MensRights28/04/15 10:35 PM
7

These aren't good people. They're hateful people using a cause as an excuse to vent their hatred and malevolence.
/r/MensRights27/04/15 07:24 PM
2

So the point is to whip up anti-white sentiments?
/r/MensRights23/04/15 02:58 AM
2

That's sort of like advising a husband to stand up to his wife. We all know who has the crazed tenacity to hang on and make the other miserable longest, and which of the pair doesn't have a need to make sense.
/r/MensRights21/04/15 08:04 PM
15

Ok, a guy who's had a lot of success with women might be reasonable to think it could be real. Most guys, no.
/r/MensRights20/04/15 06:21 PM
134

The other 30% probably had low IQs. If an attractive young woman comes up to some average guy on the street that way, he's got to know something is wrong.
/r/MensRights20/04/15 06:12 PM
2

Makes me wish we could all just move off-planet, then watch as they stew and implode without someone to blame for all their bullshit.
/r/MensRights18/04/15 01:34 AM
11

The sponsor said Lenhardt later recounted waking up at 3:30 a.m. to discover her daughter's 16-year-old boyfriend having sex with her. Out comes an accusation of rape to make herself the victim, of course.
/r/MensRights17/04/15 02:15 AM
2

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/des-hague-former-ceo-of-centerplate-sentenced-for-animal-cruelty-1.3034701 http://infotel.ca/newsitem/vernon-man-sentenced-on-animal-cruelty-charges-will-get-to-keep-his-dog/it18595 http://www.opposingviews.com/i/society/animal-rights/man-sentenced-99-years-prison-animal-cruelty-charges Cruelty against animals laws are taken seriously. It's true that animals are treated inhumanely on factory farms, but people are trying to change that. It's all abou…
/r/MensRights16/04/15 11:32 PM
2

Why do you believe in slavery? Even animals have rights in our society. You're not allowed to be cruel to them, for example.
/r/MensRights16/04/15 10:46 PM
1

If it's sentient, it has rights. How do you prove sentience, though?
/r/MensRights16/04/15 07:08 PM
10

More like a women who cheated on then divorced her husband and is now living with her boyfriend in her ex-husband's former house while collecting child support from him.
/r/MensRights15/04/15 05:49 PM
2

Actually, seeing as there is a net transfer of wealth from men to women through taxation, insurance, pension contributions, and other means, I'd say we already do.
/r/MensRights13/04/15 04:00 PM
3

That's how I'd describe her, an egalitarian.
/r/MensRights13/04/15 03:57 PM
1

http://articles.latimes.com/1994-09-09/news/mn-36418_1_women-candidates The most comprehensive study ever done of women's chances of winning elections delivered a verdict that surprised even its authors: Women candidates have the same chance of victory as men, no better and no worse. The survey, released Thursday by the National Women's Political Caucus, appeared to shoot down a prevailing political belief: That women, because of biases on the part of voters and women's general status as outside…
/r/MensRights12/04/15 03:53 AM
2

It still leads to important institutions being totally dominated by women. Lots of government offices, for example. Schools. Courts. Etc.
/r/MensRights11/04/15 03:06 PM
3

You'd be surprised. A lot of women prefer the male candidates.
/r/MensRights11/04/15 02:45 PM
1

This doesn't bode well for society.
/r/MensRights11/04/15 05:28 AM
36

You always step on someone to get to the top. No respect for the people who do. If they can't get there by merit, then they can fuck off. like any sane person would Like any sane sociopath, that is.
/r/MensRights09/04/15 10:15 PM
9

And the decline of Reddit begins.
/r/MensRights06/04/15 10:31 PM
1

This absurd list would make it literally impossible for men and women to coexist without the women being endlessly "sexually harrassed". It all just has to happen in their own minds. The only way out for men would be segregation.
/r/MensRights05/04/15 10:05 AM
1

I keep saying it. We need to set up a woman-only city and send these types there. Consider it to be a form of mental institution.
/r/MensRights02/04/15 07:44 PM
3

Poor advice. The only way to be sure is to not put it in at all.
/r/MensRights02/04/15 07:09 PM
19

Well, go and read one of her books if you want proof. I believe they're full of citations.
/r/MensRights29/03/15 08:31 PM
-1

He must be tempted to wait until everyone is out of the house, then toss a Molotov in. Let her screw her boyfriend on the ashes of a bed.
/r/MensRights26/03/15 02:58 AM
6

I wish we could set up a women-only city and tell all these whiners to go there and finally shut up.
/r/MensRights23/03/15 07:05 PM
9

This girl should go onto a website somewhere as an eternal warning to men about her.
/r/MensRights21/03/15 06:56 PM
5

That's because many men are now complicit in their own emasculation, and you can't blame women for that. Actually, you can. Boys are being trained to become this, in the female-owned classrooms, by the feminist media that depicts anything male as either villainous or incompetent, and by all the mothers who have used the family courts to part fathers from their families, leaving boys with no male role model at all.
/r/MensRights19/03/15 06:44 PM
0

I disagree. Sometimes knocking someone on his ass is the only way he'll learn anything.
/r/MensRights19/03/15 01:44 AM
2

Hydrophilic? Attractive to water?
/r/MensRights18/03/15 10:21 PM
3

Does this mean you have an arrest on your record now? That could be a problem, given the shitty way things work these days.
/r/MensRights17/03/15 07:59 PM
1

They should be flogged.
/r/MensRights17/03/15 09:00 AM
20

Women love to complain about the past and how they were "mistreated". So let's shed some light on what it was really like then, shall we?
/r/MensRights16/03/15 08:53 PM
5

that female is the best and most important gender They are, but only to themselves, and only subjectively. That's the distinction they seem unable to understand, that they just like female nature better than male nature rather than there being anything innately better about it..
/r/MensRights13/03/15 06:43 PM
1

Yep. On a bus that was on it's way downtime via the highway system. It was going to take up to an hour to arrive. Every seat was full save for one. A woman with her luggage. People standing in the aisle. One finally asked to sit there. She actually tried to say no, she wanted to rest her luggage there. I liked his reply, telling her she hadn't bought a ticket for her luggage, had she.
/r/MensRights08/03/15 05:34 PM
5

Yes, the problem is that women aren't dominating absolutely everything but the grunt jobs. It's a fucking crisis.
/r/MensRights06/03/15 04:50 PM
2

Do you have a computer at home? If you really want to learn some programming, just do it yourself. Find a mentor (older student? online?) who you can ask questions of when you're stuck. Start with some easy problems. Same with engineering. Build things at home. Learn to use your hands and tools. That'll put you far ahead of people attending these classes. It's more than most of those girls will ever do.
/r/MensRights06/03/15 03:29 PM
2

Give them time. You don't reach the apex positions in 10 or 20 years of work.
/r/MensRights26/02/15 03:13 AM
1

Talk to people one on one instead of a group. Mention individual issues instead of "mens rights". Don't be strident about it; I find that arguing vigorously doesn't help. Just plant the seed with a few facts and let the subconscious mind nurture it and adopt it.
/r/MensRights24/02/15 07:00 PM
6

Highly irritating. If some women like coding but don't like being around men, what's stopping them from forming teams, clubs and companies of their own? What's stopping them from following in the tracks of these guys who start in a college dorm and end up billionaires? Absolutely nothing except their own lack of will. And of course this discrimination case will cast a chill over the industry. Who is going to dare to fire female employees? Especially when they want or need to meet some gender rat…
/r/MensRights24/02/15 07:46 AM
1

online abuse I.e. disagreement backed with facts and reason?
/r/MensRights21/02/15 12:09 PM
19

The problem is they say both at the same time. They want equality and they want special privileges and they expect men to know when it's one and not the other. Nothing a man does is good enough.
/r/MensRights19/02/15 03:17 PM
6

women are just going to be parachuted into the senior management roles by way of quotas Already being done in Germany.
/r/MensRights18/02/15 08:20 AM
2

Can we have gender-segregated universities now please?
/r/MensRights18/02/15 02:11 AM
29

.. a crime so heinous that even innocence isn't a defense.
/r/MensRights17/02/15 07:13 AM
1

Yeah, this is a subreddit, not a grammar school.
/r/MensRights13/02/15 04:32 AM
3

So, don't point out the hypocrisy to counter (and maybe defuse, yeah as though that ever happens, haha) feminist outrage? Just supinely take another example of their idiot double standards?
/r/MensRights12/02/15 07:54 PM
2

Did anyone ask why they should want to be married to a woman who can't stand not getting her own way all of the time?
/r/MensRights11/02/15 08:34 AM
17

Yeah, men apparently have to do without a double dose of the bitch gene, the buy-all-shoes gene, the vanity gene, the feelings-before-reason gene, etc.
/r/MensRights11/02/15 08:28 AM
42

Don't go back to her. She'll just see it as a sign she can get away with it and worse.
/r/MensRights08/02/15 06:34 AM
6

One poster? Doesn't matter. Every single fucking poster, media message and bulletin board showing the man as the villian/idiot and the woman as the victim/wise problem solver? What kind of message do you think young minds in particular absorb from that? That's social engineering, and that's the problem.
/r/MensRights06/02/15 08:04 PM
8

When you hear the same "joke" repeated a hundred thousand times in a thousand ways, it's not a joke, it's social engineering. "If you repeat a lie often enough, people will believe it, and you will even come to believe it yourself."
/r/MensRights02/02/15 04:40 AM
3

You're embarrassing the rest of us in here.
/r/MensRights02/02/15 03:27 AM
16

And don't forget romance novels, i.e. the female version of pornography.
/r/MensRights02/02/15 03:26 AM
12

Maybe you do, right now, but when you are in your fifties and alone and childless, you are likely to feel different. I feel like I dodged a bullet after all of the divorces and unhappy marriages. You're right, though, the gene pool will adjust itself toward characteristics that favor breeding. It doesn't care about how fair relationships or laws are or how miserable the men involved become or whether they can afford to give their children a good start in life. All these woman who think having a …
/r/MensRights02/02/15 01:18 AM
2

See the picture at the start of the article? Looks like they were going to spend 75 million pounds building a freaking country resort for them.
/r/MensRights26/01/15 08:31 PM
-4

Poor little whipped man.
/r/MensRights26/01/15 08:15 PM
1

Has anyone set up a legal fund for this guy to help challenge these idiotic laws?
/r/MensRights26/01/15 07:47 PM
17

I wonder if she's ever seen an erection in her life. Flacid dick size isn't much of an indicator.
/r/MensRights26/01/15 02:49 AM
1

Knock it off, you know perfectly well how idiots are going to turn this into a black and white issue where any man sitting at any time who doesn't have his legs pressed together like a fucking eunuch will be castigated. People and especially feminists don't deal in shades of grey.
/r/MensRights21/01/15 07:27 PM
1

Or worse, a monster baby carriage deluxe which they park in the middle of everything as though they own the place.
/r/MensRights21/01/15 07:24 PM
3

The Womens Studies departments have to compete for funding, so they have to do something attention grabbing.
/r/MensRights21/01/15 07:22 PM
7

Why do these women keep trying to tell us how men think and behave? What do they know about it? They're just projecting their own fear and insecurity onto us.
/r/MensRights21/01/15 07:14 PM
2

These "feminists" are beginning to make themselves impossible to live with.
/r/MensRights21/01/15 07:13 PM
1

Because, being in "tune" emotionally and talking about it incessantly is more important than just getting the job done?
/r/MensRights20/01/15 04:16 AM
2

Great, hours of moaning about problems that could be solved in five minutes.
/r/MensRights19/01/15 05:30 PM
2

Well, you can expect male admissions applications to drop right off. They university may be able to enrol the same number of males, but the quality will be substantially lower.
/r/MensRights16/01/15 04:46 PM
1

Some of these radfems might best be described as demons. Plain and simple.
/r/MensRights13/01/15 07:29 PM
24

Innocence is not a defense! /s
/r/MensRights12/01/15 06:19 PM
1

And if a woman is on the other side of the street, you should just move to the center of the street and spin?
/r/MensRights12/01/15 12:59 AM
1

If two women approach each other on a sidewalk, and neither gives way, is it the nearest man's fault?
/r/MensRights11/01/15 07:16 PM
1

How do they deal with each other, then?
/r/MensRights11/01/15 09:40 AM
18

So she literally believes that men should just all spring out a woman's way, giving her total precedence? Like peasants before the Pharaoh or so?
/r/MensRights11/01/15 07:57 AM
8

that men can stop other men from doing. I laugh when I hear this. How? How am I supposed to identify the extremely rare specimen of a would-be rapist, and then stop him? Am I supposed to have a spidey-sense to know, and then tail him stealthily until he hides in a bush, and spring out in the nick of time? If I can do this, why can't women too? Ridiculous. It's all calculated feminist crap to put themselves in a position of supposed moral superiority forever.
/r/MensRights10/01/15 08:21 PM
2

Yet one more proof that brains aren't at the top of the female list, right? lol
/r/MensRights10/01/15 04:24 AM
5

Except for the lazy men Some decide that "prize" at the top of the mountain isn't worth it.
/r/MensRights10/01/15 04:22 AM
9

With a chocolate penis that ejaculates money.
/r/MensRights10/01/15 04:20 AM
1

Some people care about status and power as much as or more than money.
/r/MensRights09/01/15 06:07 PM
2

Well, it's obvious, isn't it? The man can't be the woman's wife, or she'll lose respect and divorce him. So he just should be out there, earning even more money, and hiring a nanny and housekeeper! Else she's being oppressed!
/r/MensRights09/01/15 06:06 PM
7

I have something better for Ms. Valenti than these Jim Crow laws. Separate countries. Let the radfem bitches do their own mining and oil extraction and firefighting and construction and road work and rail operation and the like with their all-important bodies oh-so-secure from even a male gaze. We'll see how long it takes for them to discover an appreciation for men then.
/r/MensRights09/01/15 12:38 AM
5

Profiting until they're falsely accused that is.
/r/MensRights07/01/15 01:33 AM
3

I've asked whether women ever really loyally love their husbands, or only stayed with him so long as enough items on the mental checklist are ticked and nothing better has come along. I believe some women can love the way men hope for, based on this story. Her husband was in a coma for 19 years. Grzebska, 63, said that for years she fed her husband Jan carefully with a spoon and moved his body to prevent bed sores. Despite doctors' advice that he would not live, his wife never gave up hope and t…
/r/MensRights05/01/15 10:00 PM
2

I don't think it's girls that intimidate them, it's teachers, nearly all of who are female in the early years, who will slap them down if they fight back. As well as disparage them without provocation throughout their school careers.
/r/MensRights05/01/15 06:24 PM
3

Odd, because majority males didn't stop them from invading other professions.
/r/MensRights05/01/15 06:23 PM
2

They were both wrong.
/r/MensRights05/01/15 06:21 PM
6

That's a good one. If two women have sex while drunk, is the nearest man to blame?
/r/MensRights02/01/15 06:47 AM
3

Sounds like they might have beaten the older guy to death if his friends hadn't arrived.
/r/MensRights01/01/15 07:23 PM
9

Feminism hasn't been about equality for a long time now. And if by "intelligent" you mean "ruled by emotion", "educated" you mean "dogmatic" and "cultivated" you mean "indoctrinated" when referring to these "feminists", you might have something. As for "You should probably not apply", why don't you go apply your face to the interior of your arrogant, blinkered ass.
/r/MensRights01/01/15 03:02 AM
2

Maybe they should make seats big enough to sit in, then. Why don't we start campaigning for seats large enough for men. Women are smaller, it's only fair they should have to sit in smaller seats to give men more room.
/r/MensRights31/12/14 10:42 PM
7

there is always the pre-nuptial agreement Which are regularly thrown out by the courts, noob.
/r/MensRights31/12/14 06:22 PM
4

Are you talking about bricks, or cinder blocks?
/r/MensRights31/12/14 04:51 AM
9

How do you determine that when she accuses you two months or years later, claiming she was drunk?
/r/MensRights30/12/14 11:12 PM
1

And the search for a man to blame it on begins...
/r/MensRights30/12/14 02:50 PM
29

Because women are more equal than men.
/r/MensRights29/12/14 02:50 PM
2

Maybe men should campaign for large seats for men and smaller seats for women to reflect physical reality.
/r/MensRights22/12/14 05:57 PM
2

What is the typical feminist stance on dildos? I mean, don't they even go beyond porn? Instead of a just an image, it's a physical effigy. What disgusting hypocrisy that they aren't after women about those.
/r/MensRights22/12/14 04:16 PM
2

Maybe if they gave a little more room, instead of, for example, expecting guys who are 6'4" tall to crush their legs into the gap between the inside seat and the end of a facing row. And concerning some of the hyper-obese women who practically are two people, maybe we should be putting up signs telling them to go on a diet. Wouldn't feminists just scream about that, without seeing any dissonance at all?
/r/MensRights21/12/14 09:59 AM
2

It's telling how the feminists throw a rabid shitstorm the moment someone suggests that boys and girls be schooled separately according to their separate natures.
/r/MensRights12/12/14 10:55 PM
1

This is the same as asking what happens for an eight man fire department vs. an eight man plus one woman fire department. If eight men are not enough, they're not enough.
/r/MensRights12/12/14 10:36 PM
0

The way they handle this situation is like this: If the man is driving drunk, the pedestrian he hits is the victim. If a woman is driving drunk, the pedestrian she hits is charged with a crime.
/r/MensRights12/12/14 10:34 PM
6

Not in California, not anymore. You have to verify there is consent for each move before you make it.
/r/MensRights12/12/14 10:32 PM
9

I doubt it. It'll just mean some woman earns a fireman's pay and pension while one more man has to be hired.
/r/MensRights12/12/14 01:36 PM
1

they aren't gonna go home and play submissive doormat just to stroke someone elses ego I see, so actually being nice to your husband and caring about his well being is being a "submissive doormat". Something no wife should have to do. That's exactly the sort of message women are given these days. In any case, you don't have to like the reasons why men are opting out to recognize what's happening.
/r/MensRights07/12/14 01:46 AM
0

Stepped on your sensitive little nerve, did I? Too bad. Modern society is built on cooperation more than competition, but the hallmark of the sort of men that women choose when they can is not cooperation. It's dominance, aggression and not giving a shit about who they tread on. Good luck trying to maintain the current society with that sort of population. If you can't see what amounts to simple mathematics, that's your problem. Although another possibility is that women will just fill in that p…
/r/MensRights07/12/14 01:26 AM
3

A glimpse of the future.
/r/MensRights07/12/14 01:15 AM
2

But let's hold yearly vigils and make a media issues out of it when it's a man killing women like Marc Lépine, right?
/r/MensRights06/12/14 09:22 PM
1

You say "strong", I hear a code word for "domineering". You say "independent", I hear a code word for "doesn't need you, only cares about herself". You say "assertive", I hear code for "pigheaded and arrogant". Men have to go out and do battle with the world each day to earn a living. They certainly don't want to go home and have to do battle with a "strong woman" as well, especially one who is given all sorts of legal levers to pull if she's feeling vindictive. However unfair you think that is,…
/r/MensRights06/12/14 08:30 AM
9

Well, gee, a man doesn't want to marry another man in a woman's body. And not only that, but a man in a woman's body trained since birth to feel entitled that everything should be about "her", and that "her" husband's only point to exist is to make "her" happy, and that the husband should be discarded, ripped apart from his children, and financially reamed the moment he doesn't. Who'd have guessed it?
/r/MensRights05/12/14 11:53 PM
1

Guess the rates of death by police are just going to keep on rising, because they have no lack of defenders like you no matter what they do.
/r/MensRights05/12/14 07:49 AM
14

I'm sort of curious, in a morbid way, about the society which unleashed female hypergamy will create. If they breed largely with the aggressive, physical sort, and the less dramatic, more productive and more thoughtful men get the cold shoulder systematically or just chose to GTOW, what happens as the character of generations change? Will it turn into one big battle ground? Who will do the steady grind of day to day jobs? Not everyone can lead or be an athlete or a thug.
/r/MensRights05/12/14 07:39 AM
2

I didn't see where he said anything about sandwiches. Tell me more about the sandwiches.
/r/MensRights05/12/14 01:37 AM
1

If this sort of thing becomes more prevalent, maybe men and women should just live apart.
/r/MensRights03/12/14 10:29 PM
3

If this goes through, maybe men and women should just start living apart.
/r/MensRights02/12/14 10:02 PM
4

So when the lights come on, and you discover all the push-up, prop-up padding and that she painted her face on, has she raped you?
/r/MensRights30/11/14 11:53 PM
2

Piss on them.
/r/MensRights30/11/14 11:34 PM
5

The law treats sex as something women have done to them. They can't be doing it, even if they're on top riding the bronco full speed.
/r/MensRights30/11/14 07:45 PM
6

Just wasted three seconds of my life reading some idiot's attempt to trivialize the problem of boys' performance at school and a few more replying in the vain hope he might learn something.
/r/MensRights29/11/14 11:16 PM
1

Seems to me they're just looking for any excuse they can find to go off.
/r/MensRights28/11/14 09:20 PM
29

I wonder how much of this goes on without the women in the decision making positions actually admitting it.
/r/MensRights28/11/14 01:16 AM
8

"It will not be good enough to simply say that your intentions were honourable and you were just inviting a colleague to your apartment at two in the morning to play a game of Scrabble at the end of a day of playing sports and drinking," said Goldring's statement, issued from a parliamentary email address. "MPs must learn, as I have from encounters with authority figures in the past, that all do not tell the truth. I now wear ‘protection’ in the form of body-worn video recording equipment," the …
/r/MensRights27/11/14 08:02 PM
4

Maybe once women start building up big corporations from scratch on their own to any real degree they'll deserve significant representation on boards, instead of just being forcibly parachuted in where some man has succeeded.
/r/MensRights27/11/14 06:09 AM
2

Why would men start getting treated better if her lawyers manage to get her a break from the system? It's more likely that we'll just see women given preferential treatment in that regard like they get throughout the rest of the court system. But you want us to shut up about it. Just man up and don't complain, eh?
/r/MensRights26/11/14 09:19 PM
6

So, just shut up and say nothing if she gets preferential treatment then?
/r/MensRights26/11/14 07:23 AM
1

And yet people are opposed to having webcams/microphones monitoring hallways and yards in the schools, with protected access online for parents. They're opposed to having volunteer parents watch onsite during recess and between classes.
/r/MensRights25/11/14 01:25 AM
3

Sounds like he'd have got less time if he simply shot his ex.
/r/MensRights24/11/14 08:47 PM
2

In typical cowardly fashion, they purged the comments and closed off commenting.
/r/MensRights22/11/14 07:55 PM
1

Only if you're unattractive to her.
/r/MensRights10/11/14 07:34 AM
1

That's right, keep shifting the goalposts and focusing on nitpicks instead of the actual message. Anything except admit your "foe" has a point. I despise butt-headed, reason-hindmost humanity. It's amazing that any of you semi-evolved apes actually ever get anything done.
/r/MensRights05/11/14 07:16 AM
1

I think these are single use washrooms. Only one person at a time, with a lock inside the door. Otherwise it's idiotic, I agree.
/r/MensRights04/11/14 01:15 PM
14

"No greater injustice". How could she state more clearly that men are less valuable than women?
/r/MensRights02/11/14 11:46 PM
1

Go read here. TumblrInAction: comments/2i6nb6/tw_vice_would_a_curfew_for_men_be_good_for_society/ Yes, it's not a proper link, because a bot removes a direct link to reddit and the np.reddit link just flips back and forth between "subreddit has moved" messages.
/r/MensRights02/11/14 08:28 PM
2

Shut up and listen to all of one line? Just what is that you disagree with here, that a man might want more than a series of one nighters and temporary relationships that end when the woman gets frustrated? That sex with someone he cares about can be a lot more satisfying than with near strangers?
/r/MensRights02/11/14 05:53 PM
5

And what is that guy, somewhere younger than 26 years old? You wish for more after a while.
/r/MensRights01/11/14 04:08 PM
1

Funny you should say that, because that's exactly the way these women are portraying themselves. Your feminists are the masters of self-made victimry. They're having a very noticeable impact on society with their constant yelling and demands. Men being removed from the schools is not a joke. Men being removed from their families through female-initiated divorce is not a joke. Now they're launching a campaign about "street harassment". How long until some opportunist politician passes some law li…
/r/MensRights01/11/14 04:05 PM
3

Yes, all that matters is rape. The whole of society's discourse should be about rape because it's a crime worse than destroying the universe. That is all that should ever be talked about or planned around. Anything else should be discounted or discarded outright. Every woman is a victim and every man is a monster. Men should systematically be eliminated from the family, from the schools and from anywhere in public a woman appears. (Oh wait, the first two have already happened and we're on to the…
/r/MensRights01/11/14 02:11 AM
2

and birth rate plummets to zero In which case they just bring in more immigrants. It's hopeless.
/r/MensRights01/11/14 02:05 AM
1

Men need a new frontier. Some place to go and build a life, independent of all the bullshit. Women will follow to take advantage of what men have built as always, but it'll quite a while before they can start dominating.
/r/MensRights01/11/14 02:03 AM
3

Joy, another step toward letting women sacrifice their lives on the corporate altar. The truth is that only a few will want to do so, and the rest will be pressured into delaying childbirth to remain at optimal productivity. Although with automation and computers replacing jobs, the developed (corporate) world is going to be a very different place in fifty years anyhow. The only places that won't change are those where people already live at a subsistence level.
/r/MensRights29/10/14 06:45 PM
1

It's due to the notion that sex is something men do, and is something women have done to them. So even if the woman is drunk, she's not the one doing something.
/r/MensRights29/10/14 06:19 PM
33

In California, with "yes means yes", all sex is rape now. Just that sometimes the women doesn't have the man charged for it.
/r/MensRights28/10/14 05:57 PM
1

She sounds reasonable. He could just pay it and she could hand it back. Although I suppose the court parasites would take their cut first.
/r/MensRights25/10/14 06:01 PM
0

The closest true equivalent might be an expensive car, like a Mercedes with a $ sign for its logo. Or an expensive suit and a Rolex watch.
/r/MensRights24/10/14 03:55 PM
2

why are you so defensive? Any group that is constantly, and at least somewhat if not completely injustly, attacked is going to be defensive. And then there's the weariness factor. If everyone except a white man has it so fucking bad here, then move somewhere else! Go set up a woman-only city. Go set up a black-only city, where everything will be so much better apparently. No one is stopping anyone. Just put a lid on the constant complaining for a while, good grief, a hundred years of catching sh…
/r/MensRights24/10/14 11:20 AM
1

Beating the shit out of random people isn't going to solve the problem.
/r/MensRights23/10/14 10:42 AM
15

My first thought was that these lawyers don't like the idea of losing the income from messy custody battles.
/r/MensRights20/10/14 02:56 AM
4

The point is that it's much less of an option for men than women. Society punishes them for it. Women tend to divorce men who aren't earning any money. They hate it. http://www.livescience.com/14705-husbands-employment-threatens-marriage.html
/r/MensRights19/10/14 12:02 AM
1

I bet most men would also rather spend their days with their kids than go to work Not as many. Face it, a man is defined by his job in this society. Pretty much the first thing people ask is what you do.
/r/MensRights18/10/14 06:00 PM
3

They should be flogged as well as imprisoned.
/r/MensRights17/10/14 04:55 PM
2

Rent can be split into two by sharing. Cooking from scratch is less expensive on a per-person basis when done for more than one. Heating can be split into two. Electricity mostly split into two. Basic phone service, internet service and cable split into two. Etc. It's less expensive for a person to live with someone who shares the costs than to have the same quality of life on his/her own.
/r/MensRights15/10/14 11:50 PM
3

Good, let's set up a country without men as an experiment for them first. Let them find out first hand just how much men do in the world, when they finally have to do it for themselves, the spoiled idiots.
/r/MensRights15/10/14 11:42 PM
2

Simple arithmetic can tell you that even a poor second income is better than having none, since costs can be shared.
/r/MensRights15/10/14 11:39 PM
3

What does she think government help is, other than a transfer of wealth from mainly men, produced by male labor, into her pocket?
/r/MensRights15/10/14 11:36 PM
6

"I'll bet you half my stuff you'll love me forever!" Women want to get married, they just don't want to be married.
/r/MensRights15/10/14 11:32 PM
9

It's not far-fetched, it's called ectogenesis and scientists are working on it.
/r/MensRights14/10/14 08:29 PM
6

And yet we commonly hear about ex-wives applying for increases to alimony years after their divorces, when the ex-husband wins the lottery.
/r/MensRights14/10/14 06:41 AM
8

Third, patriarchy has also meant male power over the family. Feminist denunciations of marriage, after all, have often described it as a system that secured male power over children You can just see how their thinking works. It was all about power over children, was it? That's what women have now, with the family courts and schools driving men out of the lives of children. That's what they have, so they are projecting that want onto us. What the old family did provide was some assurance that men…
/r/MensRights14/10/14 04:59 AM
1

It's purpose isn't to psychologically damage inmates either.
/r/MensRights12/10/14 10:27 PM
2

What would you call being kept in a barren cell for 23 hours a day? A holiday?
/r/MensRights12/10/14 07:24 AM
1

They could pitch a tent, obviously. Or build the equivalent of a tar paper shack. That's the real reason, cities don't want shanty towns to appear. So the homeless are kept homeless by all of the laws. You don't need to hand out five acres of land either (and at $10000, that land would have to be somewhere remote from any place the employers are). 30 feet by 30 feet would be enough to give a homeless man a place to live and a garden to scratch out some food from, and so he becomes much more able…
/r/MensRights12/10/14 04:32 AM
1

Even though young men commit suicide at a far higher rate.
/r/MensRights10/10/14 07:39 PM
1

Universities have become fairly joyless places for undergraduates in general. Few rites of passage left to young men, and a torrent of work.
/r/MensRights08/10/14 02:12 AM
2

The first wave of young women who have never known other than public school feminist "girls good boys bad" indoctrination (the "our girls are in crisis" reaction began in the mid-to-late '90s) are reaching the colleges now.
/r/MensRights05/10/14 11:35 PM
3

Rape rape rape rape rape rape rape. Fuck rape, I am so sick of hearing about it, it's like all that fucking matters in the world is rape. Can we just agree to live in different places? Keep your precious, precious bodies and your superior attitudes in perfect isolation, it's the only way you'll ever be happy as far as I can tell.
/r/MensRights04/10/14 07:06 PM
5

People don't deal with grey areas very well. Simple rules for simple minds. Also, a lot of them don't seem to care whether a rule is right or wrong, only that they are in line with the group mind.
/r/MensRights04/10/14 06:18 PM
5

Except that we've seen how selectively the law can be enforced.
/r/MensRights01/10/14 09:56 PM
6

I'm sure he loves it. Any fogginess in the law leads to endless dollars finding their way into lawyer pockets, as well as pressure to hire the best lawyers to tilt the now totally subjective process in your favor.
/r/MensRights30/09/14 07:05 PM
1

Why don't they just ban sex and be done with it. Since there will never be a sex act in that state again that can't turned into a crime.
/r/MensRights30/09/14 05:27 AM
0

Like an echo chamber for the mass media.
/r/MensRights30/09/14 01:38 AM
2

I wonder whether a breathalyzer test will be one part of the cumulative evidence needed to prove oneself innocent. Maybe every dorm will have one soon. Anyhow, it might be e) too many someones who are unquestionably innocent are going to be expelled, then turn around and sue the university into oblivion
/r/MensRights29/09/14 06:17 PM
6

Have you ever sat in on a circuit design review panel and had female engineer after female engineer become hyper defensive about their designs, a couple even breaking down into tears, while the male engineers simply took the suggestions and criticisms in stride? Yeah, women and men are different. Not the same. Different. Ok?
/r/MensRights29/09/14 05:04 PM
2

They're already advocating for unisex bathrooms for crying out loud. They are? Where? This would seem to go against the "equal except when it suits me" principle. Plus, it would presumably require the elimination of urinals (heaven help us if a woman catches a glimpse of a man's private parts). Meaning washrooms that are both more expensive and less efficient.
/r/MensRights29/09/14 12:54 AM
-5

I wouldn't be surprised if it's just radfem sockpuppets.
/r/MensRights22/09/14 11:17 PM
2

This from one of the most privileged women on the planet. Couldn't she have picked a more worthy cause, like global warming or destruction of the oceans?
/r/MensRights22/09/14 01:19 AM
3

Maybe the final goal is for women to occupy all decision making positions, working as one big collective in their air conditioned offices, while men do all the actual labor. Except automation.
/r/MensRights20/09/14 06:36 AM
12

Sounds like Steve was bone tired of arguments that couldn't be resolved with reason or logic to me.
/r/MensRights20/09/14 06:27 AM
1

There are plenty of instances where the woman has been clearly proven to have fabricated the whole thing. Through video evidence, for example. And the "mental illness" excuse doesn't fly. It clearly can be a malevolent act, often out of vindictiveness or for revenge, just like assault or murder. Do you claim that all assaults or murders are the product of mental illness? The courts do not recognize that at all.
/r/MensRights19/09/14 04:19 PM
1

That's good, but you're an exception.
/r/MensRights16/09/14 05:45 PM
0

Don't be too angry about it, though. Until recently, pregnancy was a big risk for women and some would die in child birth or of complications afterward. She'd literally risk her life to bear your child and be there for it always if it survived. She needed your commitment and resources in a difficult world. This is no longer the case (at least in developed countries), but it went a long way toward evening out the balance sheet while it was still true. Evolution has created this disparity because …
/r/MensRights16/09/14 05:38 PM
3

Hire a maid service, a good one. After the initial period of digging out, the cost will be fairly reasonable.
/r/MensRights15/09/14 12:35 AM
2

Can deal with it alright, see that door not hitting my ass on the way out? That's me finding someone more rewarding to spend my time with.
/r/MensRights14/09/14 12:45 AM
17

make more money than women for the same work They just love to repeat this lie, don't they. I can see men getting fed up and just emigrating. The slothful or weak willed will remain behind, leaving Sweden with a bleak future and making it even more susceptible to a Muslim conquest. It's funny how these feminists, so willing to spit fire at men over anything real or imagined, simply will not talk about the rape of women in Sweden by Muslims immigrants and the like. It's like this enormous blind s…
/r/MensRights13/09/14 07:41 PM
1

Women aren't being criminalized for being Ms. Wrong, though.
/r/MensRights12/09/14 09:30 PM
74

They've demonized attempts at flirting from men a woman isn't attracted to (aka creeps). Mr. Right is always welcome to flirt. I used to think Mr. Right was expected to telepathically know somehow that he is welcome whereas many others are not, but then I realized that women all want the same fraction of men, so Mr. Right knows from simple experience that he's Mr. Right and can't go wrong, corporate environment or no. Other men are asking for a complaint to HR by simply existing.
/r/MensRights10/09/14 10:03 PM
8

the police harassed the female student to the point where she decided not to press charges. Harassed her? They were trying to do their job! This is exactly what people here are talking about. People like you seem to think an accusation should be an automatic conviction and any investigation is "harassment"!
/r/MensRights06/09/14 04:19 PM
2

So you don't figure a false accusation is "citation" enough? In your view, false accusations are just normal, healthy female behavior?
/r/MensRights06/09/14 03:10 PM
14

It's only going to get worse as society's collective memory of saner times fades away. Feminists are succeeding at eliminating men from children's lives. In the schools, in their families and in public places too. Boys are growing up with Homer Simpson as a role model.
/r/MensRights02/09/14 11:53 PM
2

"Alpha Lays, Beta Pays" would be better.
/r/MensRights02/09/14 10:02 PM
1

Sure, let's dismiss this because it's only one woman being talked about here, and then the next case when it happens (e.g. the woman that took a blow torch to a ten year old boy) and so on, rather than try to recognize a pattern, but when a man shoots a woman (and three other men) because he was nuts, we have to listen to the feminists go ape shit and paint the media red with "all men are guilty" crap? Because who cares about the unborn boy and the men that were shot, right?
/r/MensRights01/09/14 09:17 PM
1

Really, do you honestly think that is the way it works ! Good grief, wake up and smell the coffee! But you guys are not talking about mens rights, you are bashing women ! Learn to distinguish between criticism of a movement that is damaging men in many discrete, verifiable ways and "hating all women"!
/r/MensRights01/09/14 06:00 PM
1

If it was wrong for boys to be preferred, why isn't it wrong for girls to be preferred?
/r/MensRights01/09/14 05:58 PM
1

This isn't the first case I've heard of where a woman despises her own child for being male.
/r/MensRights01/09/14 05:57 PM
4

It simply highlights the enormous disparity between men and women in society. A simple accusation by a woman against a man would have brought everything down on his head. Here, he had to resort to obtaining video evidence (i.e. allow his daughter to be abused further) to obtain even a chance of justice and to protect himself from any false accusations she would try to make against him to escape culpability.
/r/MensRights30/08/14 07:07 PM
4

It doesn't detract from how mercenary and calculating she is and how the system supports it, either. It's an example to all men.
/r/MensRights30/08/14 05:18 PM
3

So, let's not try to address any of the huge legal booby traps facing men, nor the double standards about cheating (i.e. if she had posted she was cheating because she felt he wasn't making her happy, the same people would have been posting to encourage her)? Let's just victim blame and say the poor fool who was smitten by love in his youth should be punished because Cupcake morphed into a disapproving, loveless harpy over time and then into an absolute monster when he tried to find some love an…
/r/MensRights30/08/14 05:13 PM
1

They managed to badly damage men's sports with Title IX. Now they're out to cripple the gaming industry.
/r/MensRights29/08/14 06:39 PM
3

Nuts to looking down, like some sort of slave. Just don't look at them. It's easy enough to move along, never focusing your gaze on one.
/r/MensRights26/08/14 08:19 PM
12

With all the complaining going on, about the "male gaze" and catcalling and what have you, I get the impression that some women simply want men to disappear from view, or at a minimum, act like faceless worker robots. We're only supposed to pop up when convenient. Except for Mr. Right, who is welcome to stare and catcall as much as he likes. I wonder what it's like to think the universe should revolve around her?
/r/MensRights26/08/14 04:53 PM
1

A sample size of 5,000 is not just okay, but it is really a great size. Well, that depends. If you're trying to determine the probability of something with a low rate of incidence, it's not that great a size. Also, the sample could be biased.
/r/MensRights26/08/14 06:02 AM
1

It's dishonest, but she's still in control over whether she gets pregnant or not.
/r/MensRights26/08/14 05:55 AM
1

Sometimes sarcasm and reversal doesn't come through well in a text post. Put a /s after it to make sure people understand.
/r/MensRights25/08/14 11:38 PM
3

False accusations and the ease of their being made and believed no matter how false: men's rights issue. False accusations and being paid a fortune to make them and keeping the money even if it's proven false: men's rights issue!!!! False accusations as a tool commonly used to pry men apart from their children: men's rights issue. Free legal pass to women who murder their husbands: men's rights issue. Disproportionate spending on women's health issues vs. men's health issues, despite women alrea…
/r/MensRights21/08/14 02:37 AM
3

So how do you handle the cases where the woman unilaterally decided she didn't want to work anymore? In the eyes of the court, she supposedly gave up time from her career too.
/r/MensRights20/08/14 10:55 PM
3

I think the call to end alimony is stupid, though a call to reform alimony is reasonable. Why, when the whole point of alimony was to support women who were presumed to be unable to support themselves? No longer the case, right?
/r/MensRights20/08/14 10:41 PM
2

Don't underestimate the utility of the internet in propagating new views. They sure aren't going to be disseminated in the media.
/r/MensRights20/08/14 05:37 PM
1

The drive to procreate is strong, even if people don't understand that's what's driving them.
/r/MensRights20/08/14 05:31 PM
1

Listen carefully. I wasn't advising that he buy her shit but rather that he let her buy some shit for herself as pleases her instead of being totally frugal. Do you understand the difference?
/r/MensRights14/08/14 08:10 PM
2

Understanding this, why should any man want to get married. He is just a tool and a servant to her, to be cheated on or discarded in a mercenary manner as soon as she feels her opportunities are better. Another problem is that women are evaluating men based on criteria that are not valid in a modern society. In summary, it sucks.
/r/MensRights14/08/14 12:10 AM
0

So, it's never influenced by life events?
/r/MensRights13/08/14 11:07 PM
2

If there are quotas, why do the women have to bother to work at all?
/r/MensRights13/08/14 11:01 PM
5

Our situations don't compare since I'm 30 years old than he is. But if you don't think any wisdom comes with experience (a common trait among young adults), then don't listen to me. As for "outdated gender role bullshit", shoes and handbags for women are selling as well as ever.
/r/MensRights13/08/14 05:18 PM
-2

Ok.
/r/MensRights13/08/14 03:04 PM
-16

Sounds to me like you're being a little too tight with your money. As men, we can be happy with the sort of life you described for her (i.e. basically just existing and saving). She, on the other hand, would be happier if she could occasionally buy a pair of shoes that she likes, or such. It doesn't have to be an outrageous allowance, but you can't hold the lid on too tightly either. If she gets to decide how to spend her part-time income, then I guess you're ok. You're both young. Live a little…
/r/MensRights13/08/14 02:55 PM
3

You're right, I do resent some of the shit that modern (note, modern) feminism has pulled. Why shouldn't I? Secondly, what is it, less than 3% of men commit rape, whereas something approaching 50% of marriages end in divorce, largely initiated by the wives? A lot more basis on which to generalize in the latter case, isn't there.
/r/MensRights12/08/14 09:19 PM
4

You want to talk about generalization, how about projecting the actions of a tiny fraction of men onto an entire half of the species? "Let's teach men not to rape!"
/r/MensRights12/08/14 08:25 PM
11

She's childishly irrational Which perhaps is why, once upon a time, women weren't supposed to go out except when escorted. If she doesn't have responsibility for her own actions, maybe she legally needs a chaperon or guardian?
/r/MensRights10/08/14 08:06 PM
1

It would probably be a good idea to have an extra lock or two installed on your door(s) in case she tries to break in. Make sure you have a peephole on your front door and use it before you go out. Maybe subscribe to an alarm system service too.
/r/MensRights10/08/14 05:47 PM
1

Willfully manipulating people for your own gain is.
/r/MensRights09/08/14 03:03 AM
1

I guess to some of them, these artificial wombs are a sign that men hate women so much they're trying to be rid of them.
/r/MensRights08/08/14 03:50 PM
1

It demonstrates they aren't all one homogeneous group, doesn't it. Women with widely different views all call themselves feminists.
/r/MensRights08/08/14 03:48 PM
3

, nineteen out of twenty times.
/r/MensRights07/08/14 05:06 AM
4

Hire a female bodyguard.
/r/MensRights07/08/14 05:04 AM
17

It's kind of like going down the street with a compressed air horn in hand, and then getting pissed off when people look at you as you keep sounding it.
/r/MensRights05/08/14 06:12 AM
7

Some have also suggested an artificial womb leaves a growing fetus without the immediate intimacy its mother’s body provides. I suspect this is an understatement.
/r/MensRights05/08/14 12:03 AM
3

Wait and watch. To quote another poster: she'll claim domestic abuse, people will believe her without verifying it and she'll walk away with a /r/pussypass Same thing happened with a women here in Australia, she outright murdered her husband while he was drugged and tied up in bed, claimed domestic violence and even though there was ZERO evidence of said DV, she was acquitted on all charges. /r/pussypass lets you get away with murder.
/r/MensRights04/08/14 05:56 PM
9

For a moment, I hoped this meant he was hiring a woman to fight back on his behalf.
/r/MensRights02/08/14 12:17 AM
1

Time to segregate colleges.
/r/MensRights01/08/14 03:42 AM
18

It's manipulation and it's disrespectful. If he perceives it, he'll resent her for it and even leave. Or maybe he should do the same thing? Should he "create scarcity" by withholding affection and approval? Sounds like abuse to me, not love of one's partner in life.
/r/MensRights31/07/14 11:05 PM
9

In other words, treat the person she supposedly loves most cynically and without respect.
/r/MensRights31/07/14 11:02 PM
3

You'd hope they'd compare what they were being told to what they see around them and their own life experiences and thereby detect a mass dissonance.
/r/MensRights29/07/14 07:59 PM
5

Yes, the flight of relatively wealthy white people put the city into a downward economic spiral.
/r/MensRights29/07/14 03:37 AM
0

They don't want to be treated like dirt, but they love relationship drama.
/r/MensRights28/07/14 05:38 PM
2

So the one man made a spreadsheet showcasing the times he was denied sex in a relationship and the reason why and he's called a pig for it. Meanwhile, isn't there an entire website devoted to allow women to share whatever they want to about their ex's, including exhaustive details about their sexual performance (or lack thereof)? Where is the outrage about that? The level of hypocrisy boggles the mind.
/r/MensRights28/07/14 06:21 AM
2

It sounds to me like you simply want to sweep any example that contradicts the "women are superior" narrative under the rug. Unfortunate.
/r/MensRights28/07/14 02:14 AM
2

Wow, one post and it's the "standard bearer"? I see these articles as drops of water. Individually, people brush them aside. But they keep falling and eventually people have to accept the roof is leaking.
/r/MensRights28/07/14 12:55 AM
1

me and my wife have discussed the best sex she's had and it wasn't with me Good grief. Right to your face, even. Most men have more pride that this.
/r/MensRights28/07/14 12:33 AM
3

Yeah, she was fined $80 and given 24 hours of community service. Woohoo, justice is served! It doesn't matter that it was five years ago. Is it still a relevant example of how they behave and what they can get away with? Yes. That's the point. Show this to people and challenge their blinkered view.
/r/MensRights28/07/14 12:23 AM
2

Why did she marry you? It is because she gave the best years of her life to the alphas but couldn't snag one of them? How does it feel to be Plan B? This is the deal some men feel they're being presented with. They'll never be special to her that way. They'll probably never make her hormones dance the way those alphas did. She'll always have all those other men to compare her husband to. And she wouldn't even look at beta men when they were younger, now suddenly she's interested? How are they su…
/r/MensRights27/07/14 08:01 PM
9

Why did the male character have to be a billionaire? What does that say?
/r/MensRights26/07/14 03:56 PM
2

If we could completely eradicate rape they'd just move the goalposts to that they should be treated very nicely as well and want to put us in jail for failing to. Makes me wonder if we should just segregate by gender. Then watch them implode. But it would probably just move to raping them by coexisting in the same universe.
/r/MensRights26/07/14 12:51 AM
2

It was prescription-only at the time it was introduced.
/r/MensRights25/07/14 04:41 PM
32

No, he just walked out in the middle of the appointment and never went back.
/r/MensRights25/07/14 02:18 AM
106

This happened to a guy I used to know too. He wanted to try out Rogaine. The female doctor and her idiot staff couldn't even make sure they were out of earshot before they started talking about him.
/r/MensRights24/07/14 10:35 PM
4

Good luck with your strategy, which amounts to speaking in a normal tone of voice and trying to be heard in a room full of screaming people.
/r/MensRights24/07/14 02:37 AM
1

Meanwhile all the women (and teachers too? ffs) will run out to buy up this "educational" material.
/r/MensRights23/07/14 05:06 PM
20

Make a parody of it in which the characters are reversed and post it to Youtube. Wait for the feminist backlash. Then point out their utter hypocrisy. Not that I'm advocating a crime, but if someone hacked the Disney website to plaster it with misandry warnings, I wouldn't shed a tear.
/r/MensRights23/07/14 05:03 PM
1

The Wikipedia page on false rape accusations say 8% for a 1997 Dept. of Justice study. The figures for other studies are all over the map, but nearly all of them are well above 2%. I can just as easily find a quote for a 20% incidence of false accusation: http://www.foxnews.com/story/2006/05/02/false-rape-accusations-may-be-more-common-than-thought/ Every year since 1989, in about 25 percent of the sexual assault cases referred to the FBI where results could be obtained, the primary suspect has …
/r/MensRights23/07/14 06:03 AM
1

Why the quotation marks around "two percent"? Don't believe the number? The quotes are because 2% doesn't tell the story. The difference between a false accusation of rape and a false accusation of murder is that someone didn't just invent the murder.
/r/MensRights22/07/14 11:28 PM
1

So "two percent" is the number of rape accusations in which the accuser has been charged? It ignores two important categories: (1) the accusation is proven to be false but the police/prosecutors don't do anything further for fear of discouraging rape victims from coming forward, and (2) the accused is charged and convicted despite the accusation being false. The former happens a lot and despite the accused not going to jail is still is very damaging to his life. We don't know how often the latte…
/r/MensRights22/07/14 04:57 PM
3

Maybe you could send further emails, asking what she means and basically getting her to admit in writing about the tactics she intends to use. Useful evidence in court. In any case, see a lawyer for advice.
/r/MensRights22/07/14 03:56 PM
1

Feminists don't really want equal pay for equal work so much as just plain equal pay.
/r/MensRights22/07/14 01:00 AM
2

what are the real numbers for false reporting of rape How can you tell, when "she says" is enough for a conviction, and only video or other electronic evidence (or plain stupidity on the part of the accuser) will protect the accused? I'd say it's necessary to go beyond your "call a cab" to protect yourself. Piss her off if you break up? She says you raped her. Her boyfriend finds out? She says you raped her. She's a little nuts? She says you raped her. With this sort of law, the only way to stay…
/r/MensRights21/07/14 09:23 PM
4

Sorry, but this law just reduces everything to "it's rape when she decides it's rape", no more, no less. As a man you have no objective defense; if they can prove intercourse occurred (or if you cannot prove it did not), you'd doomed, period. It literally gives every woman the ability to destroy your life on a whim. Why should men welcome that?
/r/MensRights21/07/14 07:55 PM
1

Women can't kill men in heated arguments This is just plain wrong. Pushing men down stairs or off balconies, using cars as weapons, kitchen knives, and so on.
/r/MensRights20/07/14 07:07 PM
3

What is "dating aggression"? "dating victimization"? Sounds to me like an intentionally broad definition to inflate figures.
/r/MensRights18/07/14 05:18 PM
1

I'd say posting a continual stream of false accusation instances helps to break the feminist notion that they (1) don't happen, or (2) are extremely rare, and (3) it's only the occasional man being thrown to the wolves in order that women feel safe to make rape accusations. It also helps to dispel the notion that women invariably hold the high moral ground in any dispute. It also helps draw attention to the question, if this is how many false accusations are being proven, how many more end up wi…
/r/MensRights17/07/14 07:48 PM
1

If you told a woman these things, you'd be accused of victim blaming.
/r/MensRights17/07/14 07:41 PM
3

James Tucker, defending, said his client had tragic personal circumstances in her life, which included having her child taken from her as she persisted with a violent relationship. One again, trying to blame a man. Who knows how violent the relationship really was. Maybe she was the violent one, for that matter. Mr Tucker said his client was not calculated or cruel but had personality disorder issues and did not have the ability to sustain a coherent lie. Once again, the "woman as a child" argum…
/r/MensRights17/07/14 07:40 PM
1

Where?
/r/MensRights17/07/14 12:15 AM
7

Looks like the radical feminists are succeeding with their program to destroy heterosexual relations. Shifting the burden of proof onto the accused. Trying to eliminate paternity testing. Making it legal for women to kill their husbands (or not be punished for any crime). Turning any normal argument between a married couple into an act of domestic violence by the man. Forcing the man to pay child support, whether he didn't consent (stole sperm from a condom), or was too young to consent (she rap…
/r/MensRights16/07/14 05:06 PM
31

Except with other women, I'm sure she'd say if asked. We need to set up a women-only country somewhere and let all these types flock there to try to build their feminist utopia. Watch it implode when they no longer have someone to blame things on. Let them learn first-hand what men actually do for them and society.
/r/MensRights16/07/14 04:46 PM
2

You're just repeating, parrot-like, "facts" that have been drummed into your brain. Like this supposed wage gap where women make 77% of what men do. The U.S. Department of Labor itself produced a report that attributes most of the supposed wage gap to differences between men and women in measurable factors such as job position, hours worked, experience, and education. The remainder was only a 5 to 7 percent difference. Think about this too. Corporations are ruthless. If they really could get the…
/r/MensRights15/07/14 04:39 AM
1

She was 11 years old. They couldn't do a medical exam to see whether she was still a virgin? Because I find no mention of trying in the article posted or your link in a different reply.
/r/MensRights14/07/14 10:56 PM
7

However, if a man pokes a hole in a condom to impregnate a woman without her knowledge isn't that a similar problem and just as legal? No, it isn't: http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/2014/03/07/craig-hutchinson-poked-holes-condoms_n_4918843.html The Supreme Court of Canada has unanimously upheld the sexual assault conviction of a Nova Scotia man who tried to trick his girlfriend into becoming pregnant by poking holes in her condoms.
/r/MensRights14/07/14 06:03 AM
5

There was no consent to make a child. But what does that matter if the woman wants one, right? Women have rights, men have responsibilities.
/r/MensRights14/07/14 03:39 AM
6

Good grief, I just don't see how you can maintain this cognitive dissonance. It's okay to plan for your retirement, it's prudent to lock your door at night, it's a good idea to stay out of bad sections of town at night, but suddenly if you suggest a woman has some sort of responsibility for herself, you're a retard? Why don't you just demand the laws of physics should change if a women falls, and anyone saying she shouldn't have jumped is a retard too?
/r/MensRights13/07/14 09:31 PM
19

"Victim blaming" is just another way of saying women should have no responsibilties. And your example is plainly overwrought. Here's a real life example for you: A police officer publicly explains how women who are afraid of being raped can protect themselves and reduce the odds. Reaction? Women flip out and hold a "slut walk".
/r/MensRights13/07/14 09:22 PM
12

They don't say there is nothing a woman can to prevent being raped. But when you hear about a woman who chooses to engage in behavior with attached risk factors getting raped, and point out how women can reduce these factors, they flip out, a la Slut Walks and the like. They just don't want to hear about it. As far as they're concerned, they should just have no responsibilities. It just fits in with the overall message: "Women have rights, men have responsibilities".
/r/MensRights13/07/14 09:18 PM
-5

If one side fights dirty and the other doesn't, who is going to prevail? You may find comfort in taking the moral high road, but will it sway opinion? Also, isn't "feelsplaining" an accurate summation of what they do sometimes?
/r/MensRights13/07/14 01:36 PM
5

I think this is how the minds of some women work. They start with the bedrock assumption that their feelings are valid. Therefore, if they are angry with a man, he deserves what he gets, regardless of the situation. And if another woman is angry with a man, by projection it's the same thing. Justice and reason don't enter into it. You can see this pattern of thought in the growing attempt to dismantle the justice and corrections system as applied to women. They did what they did because feelings…
/r/MensRights13/07/14 05:57 AM
9

Single female lawyer / hating on her clients / wearing sexy miniskirts / and being self-reliant Single female lawyer / hating on all men
/r/MensRights12/07/14 03:37 PM
18

For every feminist that says something like this, how many are thinking it or even saying it behind closed doors?
/r/MensRights12/07/14 05:29 AM
2

Insane.
/r/MensRights11/07/14 11:38 PM
4

I guess it's only going to grow worse, as the unindoctrinated age and die off and each wave of more fully indoctrinated new adults enter society.
/r/MensRights11/07/14 12:52 PM
1

I'll put it more bluntly then: any 50 year old and 16 year old who try to get together are going to be scorned, ridiculed and rejected by society. In fact, people might even harass them by calling him a pedophile and phoning the police regardless of the fact it's legal.
/r/MensRights10/07/14 08:19 PM
17

The article begins with: Should female secretaries be paid at the same rate as male landscapers? A better question would be, is there anything stopping female secretaries from taking work as a landscaper for the better pay instead?
/r/MensRights10/07/14 08:00 PM
1

Can legally, but no one is going to sanction it.
/r/MensRights09/07/14 06:42 AM
2

Trespassing on police property?
/r/MensRights09/07/14 06:41 AM
8

What's next, 14 year old female fondles a male baby and they arrest the baby?
/r/MensRights09/07/14 01:27 AM
2

This is what I believe the underlying agenda to be. Indoctrination, breaking of male spirit while they're young and unable to defend themselves, and elevation of women.
/r/MensRights08/07/14 06:19 PM
1

Dissens Ist Verboten!
/r/MensRights07/07/14 09:58 PM
5

I think the real message here is that boys in boys-only school are largely outside the system of indoctrination they've successfully imposed on public schools. That scares them. You know, boys actually being trained to value and believe in themselves as human beings.
/r/MensRights07/07/14 04:37 AM
1

It sounds like she's making you pay for whatever your father did (or didn't do) to piss her off (rightly or wrongly).
/r/MensRights06/07/14 04:10 PM
3

I suspect this simply reflects how females considered to have more worth than males in society at large.
/r/MensRights06/07/14 04:09 PM
32

If there is going to be a child, get a paternity test to be sure it's even yours.
/r/MensRights06/07/14 04:05 PM
4

Haha, good answer.
/r/MensRights05/07/14 08:05 PM
5

To me, it sounds like they think a man's only purpose in life is to get laid.
/r/MensRights05/07/14 08:04 PM
3

I don't see anywhere it says he repeatedly kicked her, much less in the face. Anyhow, he was attacked and had a huge surge of adrenaline running through him. But the law expects you to behave like a fucking emotionless calculator under all circumstances, apparently.
/r/MensRights05/07/14 06:14 PM
-1

Yeah, I'm sure all of that went through his mind in a split second and was carefully weighed, then he decided to throw his career away and face jail time to fight back anyway.
/r/MensRights05/07/14 05:14 PM
5

http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/134/1/163.full?sid=c1ef1168-ac60-41ea-a089-5269707e6929 Incidental Findings of Nonparentage: A Case for Universal Nondisclosure The abstract: We advocate for the incorporation of a new clause into the consent forms for pediatric genetic testing that clearly states that any incidental information about parentage will not be revealed, regardless of the result. Using a case of misattributed maternity, we examine both the pro- and antidisclosure argument…
/r/MensRights04/07/14 05:53 PM
1

You can't reason with this type. Anything criticism of women at all = a woman-hating end-of-the-world-level-crime as far as they're concerned. Meanwhile, they don't hesitate to paint all men as rapists, pedophiles and the source of all evil.
/r/MensRights04/07/14 12:46 AM
1

Time to segregate by gender wherever these rules are brought in. Who needs this hanging over them in college.
/r/MensRights03/07/14 08:19 PM
4

By their definition, there is. Are you not abjectly putting female interests before your own? Do you disagree with them in any way? Misogynist!
/r/MensRights03/07/14 04:19 PM
3

I spent time arguing with feminists there. Eventually they started deleting my posts. At which point I left and never went back, and they were able to have their anti-male circlejerks in peace, without inconvenient logic and facts being introduced.
/r/MensRights03/07/14 04:18 PM
2

Might as well just outlaw sex altogether, since basically this makes it illegal whenever the woman decides she wants it to be, including retroactively.
/r/MensRights01/07/14 03:41 AM
2

I think this is an example of the nanny state reaching an absurd level.
/r/MensRights30/06/14 09:02 PM
0

Rising demand might be a factor as well.
/r/MensRights30/06/14 01:52 AM
3

Is this what the "Because I'm a Girl" campaign was about?
/r/MensRights30/06/14 01:02 AM
4

Sounds like women with this attitude will simply breed themselves out the race. You need two children to "replace" yourself. If one dies childless, your position in the gene pool diminishes. If she repeats your behavior, it diminishes further. Etc.
/r/MensRights27/06/14 02:44 AM
6

and force you to extend or expand your career to pay alimony Or even send you to prison if you lose your job and can't get another that pays as well.
/r/MensRights25/06/14 08:57 PM
1

Whatever else you say about the two parties, the GOP is clearly puts forth more of a message about standing on your own two feet, whereas the Democrats are more about "the government will take care of you". It's no surprise that women would favor the latter more than men would. It reflects their general dispositions rather than intelligence.
/r/MensRights24/06/14 04:41 PM
3

So we're officially moving from equality to female supremacy, are we?
/r/MensRights24/06/14 04:37 PM
12

He should, just to show there are consequences when a woman makes vindictive false accusations. Where would the boy be if he hadn't had that video to show to the police? It could have seriously damaged his life.
/r/MensRights21/06/14 05:32 PM
2

Here's a case then where he never had sexual intercourse with her, and still ended up paying child support. So here’s the messed up story that began many years ago: A doctor named Sharon Irons was having an affair with a Chicago family physician named Richard Phillips. Apparently, they never had sexual intercourse, but she would perform oral sex on him. Well, after Phillips ejaculated in Irons’ mouth one night, she decided to store the semen in her cheeks and then spit it into a test tube. She l…
/r/MensRights19/06/14 05:59 PM
12

This is such a trite argument and has been so thoroughly dismissed Yeah, like everything in feminism, it's trite and easily dismissed as soon as it doesn't support the party line. I'm surprised you didn't accuse him of misogyny too. Screw it, you're not even worth talking to.
/r/MensRights19/06/14 06:23 AM
7

we're talking about a context of after sex has already happened; it's true that he can decide not to have sex Not even then. There have been cases where he's worn a condom, clearly to prevent pregnancy, then after the act, she's taken the condom and used its contents to get pregnant without his knowledge or permission. Ruling: child support.
/r/MensRights19/06/14 06:21 AM
7

I don't believe it is an oversimplification. You can recognize the same female character in nearly every movie these days. She always ignores or disparages authority figures (especially male), she always does things the way she wants (often creating trouble by doing so), and she always kicks the lead male character's ass in some contest or conflict, often when her character is introduced. Tauriel in the latest portion of The Hobbit is a perfect example. She didn't even exist in the book, but Hol…
/r/MensRights18/06/14 07:18 PM
5

I think I'll quote the AnalepticAlzabo here: Well, I mean, duh. Any animated film made within the past 25 years with a female protagonist is going to reinforce modern female opions (sic) and prejudices: men == EvilDumb, Women == real people, Adults == stodgy and clueless Pretty princesses == RULEZ TEH WORLD!1 I.e. not a very healthy time to be a boy watching cartoons/animations.
/r/MensRights18/06/14 03:08 PM
1

I suppose it would be useless to post that link to /r/feminism.
/r/MensRights17/06/14 03:42 AM
13

Their lack of interest in a men's rights issue doesn't mean everything else they believe in is bunk. That'd be a black-or-white logical fallacy. Maybe not, but it's an indication of their unwillingness to look at issues from any perspective except female advantage, which should be informative to anyone considering what they say.
/r/MensRights13/06/14 08:10 PM
2

If you're a woman, you're a part of the victim culture. Sounds just as stupid, doesn't it.
/r/MensRights10/06/14 09:05 PM
7

Don't even try to tell us that feminism isn't dogmatic.
/r/MensRights10/06/14 08:22 PM
7

I don't believe her statistics to begin with. Unless the definition of rape has been broadened to the point where "sneezing in the vicinity of" counts as rape too.
/r/MensRights07/06/14 09:40 PM
1

Well, you're right, it's an overreaction. What else will shock them into sanity though? Will we have to live with this forever? The easier peoples' lives get in terms of having their physical necessities met, the more time they have to fly off into this kind of nonsense.
/r/MensRights06/06/14 06:21 PM
1

Reading this utter shit really raises my ire. If some are saying it outright, it gives you an idea of how many more are thinking it or at least not dismissing it. It makes me hope that technology advances the point where we can just ditch them all (e.g. leave the planet) and let them fester in the supposed "female utopia" that would arise without men.
/r/MensRights06/06/14 02:03 PM
12

More or less, "boys become men when they subvert their needs and wants for mine".
/r/MensRights05/06/14 04:45 PM
6

Wouldn't that mean women are a lot more privileged than men these days, given the relative numbers attending?
/r/MensRights04/06/14 02:12 AM
1

The only solution is segregation by gender. That's the only thing that will finally shut them up.
/r/MensRights03/06/14 04:37 PM
1

I'm not saying it's not important, only that it's not always sufficient.
/r/MensRights03/06/14 01:57 AM
2

I'd argue that in that case, the woman is attracted to/marrying the wallet, not the man. And it's not sufficient for every woman, only some. They look for status, power, confidence and so on in a mate.
/r/MensRights01/06/14 11:39 PM
1

You might be able to save a little money if you share a two-bedroom with a room mate, but that's a personal choice.
/r/MensRights31/05/14 05:41 AM
0

Woman-only state or nation. Let the haters, blamers and fearful move there to build their paradise. Leave the rest of us in peace.
/r/MensRights31/05/14 12:45 AM
3

Every high school graduation ceremony pours yet another dollop of indoctrinated young women into society's pool of rapidly diluting sanity.
/r/MensRights29/05/14 02:17 PM
2

Yeah, men who are taking the PC tack rather than face the feminist shitstorm that would result from charging the girl.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 01:40 PM
2

Our society is destroying itself.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 06:08 PM
5

It's simple, they want to dismiss the fact he was crazy so they can use him as a weapon against anyone who dares to suggest something needs to be fixed with regards to men. Had the same thing with Mark Levine in Canada, and they will never, ever let it go. In their usual way, action of one man = guilt for all.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 10:54 AM
2

The other answer is to have a female bodyguard and instruct her to kick the harpy's ass.
/r/MensRights26/05/14 10:58 PM
2

I figure it's time to create a woman-only state or nation. Let all the man-haters, the man-blamers and all the perpetually terrified women like this one move there and try to build their feminist utopia. Let the rest of us live in peace.
/r/MensRights26/05/14 09:26 PM
3

Men are worth very little to the top men. Thus wars.
/r/MensRights23/05/14 06:02 PM
3

Answer his question.
/r/MensRights23/05/14 02:18 AM
2

So, the moral is you're less likely to get shot if you have an off duty police officer with you. What would have happened if you didn't? Still, I think the family has to come first. Live rather than hide.
/r/MensRights22/05/14 12:07 AM
3

Well gee, why don't we just stop civilization everywhere and all sit in our homes because some woman, somewhere, might be raped otherwise.
/r/MensRights21/05/14 10:20 PM
7

Sure, but as soon as he joins or tries to join a community of any sort, at least one person will either know or dig up the dirt, and you can be absolutely sure that person will spread her/his nugget of gossip as far and wide as possible, no matter how unfairly.
/r/MensRights21/05/14 02:45 PM
1

Does he belittle her now, pointedly using her own words?
/r/MensRights21/05/14 04:46 AM
12

A tiny handful of men are in positions of power. The vast, vast majority are not. If I pointed out that a handful of blacks commit the majority of crimes, would that justify me in saying all blacks are criminals? I should paint them all with the same brush? Because that's what you're doing with men.
/r/MensRights21/05/14 04:27 AM
19

Don't you love the euphemisms they always use in these articles like "Adolescent boys find it more difficult to speak about their sorrows" for "Adolescent boys are ridiculed and condemned by nearly everyone for showing emotional vulnerability".
/r/MensRights19/05/14 02:46 PM
1

Well, if a woman hitting someone isn't assault, then why not hire another women to give her a beat down?
/r/MensRights18/05/14 06:25 PM
6

If she's like this now, imagine how she'd be if she trapped you in a marriage.
/r/MensRights14/05/14 11:18 PM
2

Basically presents a case of the far left's impracticality imploding upon itself.
/r/MensRights14/05/14 07:03 PM
2

Or just. "Women have a strong stake in owning the bureaucratic hierarchy of jobs that could be built up out of regulating sustainability".
/r/MensRights12/05/14 10:47 PM
1

Sounds like it's time to leave. She's not worth wrecking your life.
/r/MensRights12/05/14 10:45 PM
1

Jill and Susan's argument over a point of business dissolved into a shrieking match, after which Jill ran away crying. What is the likely cause? A. Jill and/or Susan were experiencing PMS. B. Jill tried to used logic. C. Jill dared to criticize something Susan had done, and Susan became hyperdefensive. D. All of the above. I wonder what they'd make of that?
/r/MensRights12/05/14 10:38 PM
18

His mentality reflects what a lot of young men are doing. They're having a look around, saying "fuck this", and shelving their ambitions. Why bust your ass for a society that vilifies you and never appreciates anything you do.
/r/MensRights08/05/14 11:01 PM
2

Flee the area without looking back.
/r/MensRights07/05/14 10:30 PM
1

Ooooh, hundreds of dollars. Think of all the shoes that cheated her out of. Not all that many even.
/r/MensRights06/05/14 05:01 AM
3

Carl is a disposable sperm machine to Lily and she got exactly what she wanted out of him it seems. Except for a life-long ATM, which presumably will kick in the moment he finds a job and starts paying child support.
/r/MensRights06/05/14 04:59 AM
4

Yeah, she probably mysteriously figured out she wasn't "in love" with him the moment he lost his job.
/r/MensRights06/05/14 04:58 AM
13

So, here we have an openly misandrist website. I mean, it literally can't be mistaken for anything else than a hate site. Has anyone heard of it being blocked by Nortons or such? I haven't. Has anyone heard of it being protested against by feminists? I haven't. If anyone tries to tell you misandry isn't a thing, you can just point them right here.
/r/MensRights05/05/14 01:11 AM
3

Of course, the sort of society this sort of woman really would like to see doesn't involve the destruction of male labor, it simply moves it out of sight. Still there, still contributing, but with all these women married to the government and the largess it harvests from the men, sitting in male-free air-conditioned office towers and condo blocks, sipping lattes and saying how they don't need men anymore. It's like one giant version of a divorce.
/r/MensRights20/04/14 11:51 PM
0

I've suggested this more than once.
/r/MensRights20/04/14 11:44 PM
6

Because any sort of action towards negating the blatant "girls=good boys=bad" feminist indoctrination of boys in school is "hatred".
/r/MensRights20/04/14 03:23 AM
5

"Gentleman" as in deferring to women and giving them special considerations? Or in general conduct (e.g. knowing what each fork and spoon is for).
/r/MensRights20/04/14 01:00 AM
16

Send your boy to a boy's school if you can. If enough people do this, maybe people'll wake up. Or maybe they won't, and it will be all little girls sitting in classes, taught by women to hate boys, with no men or boys to be seen.
/r/MensRights19/04/14 11:04 PM
0

Go plant some weed on her at work or wherever, then tip the police. See how she likes false accusations. Not serious, but it's satisfying to think about, isn't it.
/r/MensRights19/04/14 08:50 PM
15

Probably not a good idea. HR is not your friend, and there is no sexual harassment industry for men to motivate them. Anyhow, all he really needed to do is say to her "please don't do that, it makes me uncomfortable". If she keeps after him after that, he should start documenting it and talk to a lawyer.
/r/MensRights13/07/13 08:45 PM
2

Time to put cameras and microphones up around the property. Or at least carry them on your person. They aren't that expensive.
/r/MensRights13/07/13 04:32 AM
1

Ok.
/r/MensRights12/07/13 08:58 PM
1

Ok.
/r/MensRights12/07/13 08:58 PM
5

Here's why I responded: your first sentence more or less says "don't you go telling me or anyone else about marriage, it's none of your business". Young men need to be warned about the risks involved, and that takes communication.
/r/MensRights12/07/13 08:49 PM
1

Try being separated from your kids then. Try being forced to drive away by a court order as your five year old daughter screams "please don't go daddy".
/r/MensRights12/07/13 08:36 PM
2

it's nobody's business if/why you or I or anyone else wants to marry someone
/r/MensRights12/07/13 08:33 PM
2

Better to have loved and lost than to never have loved at all. Try it.
/r/MensRights12/07/13 08:07 PM
2

I know that's what women fear. I feel sorry for women that way, since their lives seem to be ruled by fears of the world. Nevertheless, if you look at statistics, the odds of physical abuse are tiny compared to the odds of divorce. I use the term 'physical' here because feminists are trying to broaden the definition of abuse to being a man so much as raising his voice to his wife. (Somehow the reverse just doesn't count). And half the time, it's the woman abusing or even killing her husband, bel…
/r/MensRights12/07/13 07:57 PM
2

BS. Men need to be warned about the potential consequences of getting married, such as having their children effectively taken away from them and being reduced to a life of near-poverty from having to support two households instead of one. A lot of them fling themselves into marriage without understanding the risks and end up as financial and emotional train wrecks.
/r/MensRights12/07/13 07:45 PM
2

As opposed to getting divorced after ten years and being lonely for the rest of your life? Or being stuck in a loveless marriage for the rest of your life?
/r/MensRights12/07/13 07:44 PM
3

Not to mention how divorce is a "get rich quick" scheme for lawyers.
/r/MensRights12/07/13 07:34 PM
3

I guess you didn't read, for example, about the case where a woman decided on divorce and tried to take her soon-to-be-ex for all she could. So she went and emptied their accounts while still married and borrowed all she could, then spent that. Of course the courts divide debt along with assets, and as the breadwinner, he ended up with the debt. She ended up with the equivalent of a closet full of shoes. No fault, after all. The point is that when a man enters into marriage these days, he just d…
/r/MensRights12/07/13 07:27 PM
10

From my experience treating women like second class citizens, is what they desire, if i am respectful or "nice" it is met by discontent and them getting turned off. The question is how can I ever respect a woman like this, or trust a woman like to be the mother of my children; when i know she has no incentive to stop her from sleeping with some irresponsible jerk who temporarily displays alpha traits. More so will my potential daughters become like this ? I think a lot of us are wrestling with t…
/r/MensRights12/07/13 09:23 AM
11

I believe domestic violence related incidents have become an epidemic. What is this based on? What exactly is a "domestic violence related incident", for that matter?
/r/MensRights12/07/13 07:23 AM
3

How many do they "investigate"? Seems like they dismiss a lot, and only do anything eight false accusations later.
/r/MensRights12/07/13 06:15 AM
4

Alright, so "treat him like garbage" is an exaggeration, but I don't believe women have a lot of respect for men these days.
/r/MensRights10/07/13 10:08 PM
6

Here we go with the "questioning one issue" being ballooned to "hating all women". That's all you had to say to show you have no sense of perspective whatsoever. The truth is, it's more likely that you hate men than I hate women. The issue here is that I'm not going to try to be Superman. Sorry. That went out the door with "a woman needs a man like a fish needs a bicycle". Empowered women can watch out for themselves in a society permeated with messages about how they don't need men and how usel…
/r/MensRights10/07/13 09:23 PM
12

Yeah, why should any man be expected to risk his life for some woman who would likely treat him like garbage if he said "hello" in a normal social setting.
/r/MensRights10/07/13 08:07 PM
4

Even if it were true, then for every guy cheating, there was a woman helping him.
/r/MensRights09/07/13 09:18 PM
1

Probably dress it up as ... an attempt to control women by refusing them sex. Yeah, and whose book would that be taking a chapter from.
/r/MensRights08/07/13 11:40 PM
3

It's amazing how evil women can be. I think the word is mercenary.
/r/MensRights08/07/13 10:36 PM
10

Or simply a drug that does away with the male sex drive without side effects. Basically recreating that brief period of sanity following the male orgasm, except all the time. Feminists might think such a thing would be great for women, but they have no idea how much privilege women would lose if men were liberated from their sex drive. Actually, it would probably lead to the destruction of the human race. But you can make the same argument about sexbots.
/r/MensRights04/07/13 11:31 AM
1

There has to be a non-zero probability for both states, not just one state.
/r/MensRights24/06/13 11:29 PM
5

You're being cagey, but why? Child support is a big part of divorce. Obviously lawyers have an influence on the amounts that get set. So part of the blame could be pinned on unscrupulous tactics meant to maximize their client's take. Or the vindictive client's desire to punish the ex. But what I was mostly getting at was the perception of an anti-male bias on the part of the judges. What is your experience with that? How often is the judge a female, for that matter?
/r/MensRights23/06/13 09:53 PM
4

They why does it happen?
/r/MensRights23/06/13 08:43 PM
7

Why do we hear of child support payments being set unreasonably high in some cases? I.e. more than the ex-husband can actually pay, especially in cases where his income is variable (acting for example). And then why do we hear of the courts refusing applications to lower it when the ex-husband's circumstances change (i.e. can't find similar work after losing a job)?
/r/MensRights23/06/13 08:30 PM
1

It's funny... all this time we've been worried about a privileged stratos and the serf-like trogs sort of society developing. Who'd have thought it would turn out the stratos would be women and the trogs men?
/r/MensRights21/06/13 07:59 PM
13

Why do I have the impression that "rude and disrespectful" means "doesn't put us on a pedestal and treat us as superior beings"?
/r/MensRights21/06/13 07:44 PM
2

So, do libel laws apply here? It sounds as though they should. I guess the NSA will have a hilarious time, reading reviews to each other. It's really just an extension of what the gossipers already do, isn't it. There's no hard filter of truth being applied, so the "contributors" will just say whatever suits their particular purpose. Given how destructive gossip can be, I expect no better here.
/r/MensRights21/06/13 07:42 PM
2

Not only pivotal, but they do better financially than a lot of people these days too, with steady jobs that aren't going to be downsized, usually have a government pension, and often pay very well.
/r/MensRights17/06/13 02:32 AM
3

So, you recommend the use of reason. When we're dealing with people whose reaction to the presentation of even a simple fact which contradicts their ideology is to fly off the handle and start spewing ad hominem insults such as "misogynist", "rape apologist", "loser", "small dick" and so on. They largely cannot be reasoned with.
/r/MensRights17/06/13 12:29 AM
21

We already know the character archetype, don't we. When she's introduced, she'll soon demonstrate she's better than the male leading figure in some sort of physical contest. She'll be arrogant and willful (i.e. "a strong womyn"), snarking at those around her. But a vulnerable victim too.
/r/MensRights15/06/13 04:54 PM
4

I agree with you, actually. 12 or 13 is not the same as 15, and not every case is the same. It's unfortunate how society has trouble dealing with grey areas, either elevating something to a heinous crime (men) or dismissing it altogether (women).
/r/MensRights14/06/13 10:07 PM
1

Call out who? How do you know who has the forked tongue?
/r/MensRights14/06/13 06:32 PM
4

I don't know whether that's calling it a sin so much as just being some good advice.
/r/MensRights14/06/13 06:30 PM
5

It's something I've struggled with too. I live a pretty quiet life, so you'd figure there wouldn't be much gossip simply because there's not much to talk about. That apparently doesn't stop people. It's easy to tell when it's going on. One day, you go into work and everything is normal, a couple of days later, people all won't look at you or say "hello". I'm beginning to wonder whether people just can't stand a blank canvas, so they'll color it however they like.
/r/MensRights14/06/13 06:28 PM
1

I hope they won't have to fight a war.
/r/MensRights14/06/13 06:11 PM
20

Yeah, I'm guessing "timid" and "shy" are easier on her ego than "disinterested" or "fed up".
/r/MensRights14/06/13 03:19 AM
19

Isn't that very convenient for you? Being amorphous, I mean, so whenever criticism pops up, you can just say "that's not most of us". Yet the message of these groups still goes out, doesn't it, and impacts society. Nor do we hear a lot of women decrying it.
/r/MensRights13/06/13 05:20 PM
-1

You should have included a long, long list of links to news articles describing instances.
/r/MensRights13/06/13 05:18 PM
1

Men still make more for the same work. Sigh. That is not what the pay gap means, you know.
/r/MensRights11/06/13 03:03 AM
0

No, but it seems like a lot of women these days have reduced themselves to offering only that. He's supposed to bring everything else to the relationship.
/r/MensRights11/06/13 01:27 AM
10

So, what do you figure she'll be up for... two years of probation and her license reinstated after?
/r/MensRights10/06/13 09:31 PM
33

She needs to visit some place where people have to work hard from sunrise to sunset to barely scratch out enough to live and often have to watch their children die from lack of adequate medical care. Maybe that would wake her up to what human suffering really is and her own reality as a spoiled little brat. Her brand of feminism is a luxury that could only exist in a society that has more than enough of everything.
/r/MensRights10/06/13 07:27 AM
2

It gets tiresome, having to be the reasonable one because otherwise there would be no reason at all.
/r/MensRights10/06/13 07:23 AM
31

They're trying to eliminate prison sentences for women convicted of a crime.
/r/MensRights09/06/13 08:55 AM
10

but I couldn't pull out What do you mean here?
/r/MensRights09/06/13 02:33 AM
39

Oh why oh why won't men do all the work, pay all the bills and take all the risks. Here's a gem: throwing fisticuffs if it means gaining the attention of that one woman who caught their eye Good grief, are we still living in the caves?
/r/MensRights08/06/13 06:53 PM
1

If they're more comfortable, why don't women wear them more often?
/r/MensRights08/06/13 06:30 PM
8

Considering how divorce separates men from their daughters, I'd say it is a men's right issue.
/r/MensRights08/06/13 07:10 AM
3

It just makes them look otherworldly in a lot of cases. They might as well be having surgery for pointed ears.
/r/MensRights06/06/13 08:00 PM
6

Maybe feminists didn't start the pedophile hysteria, but it sure seems to serve a purpose for them, namely cutting children off from male role models and turning men into threatening bogeymen for children as well as adult females.
/r/MensRights05/06/13 05:33 PM
7

Morale in the U.S. military must be in the toilet about now.
/r/MensRights05/06/13 03:02 PM
13

It's like these women don't know love at all. It's just checklists, calculations, and what can he do for me. If she were in love with this man, she wouldn't have any doubts.
/r/MensRights01/06/13 09:35 PM
3

Don't the figures show that more boys, both as a percentage and in real numbers, are going to college than ever before? It's just that even more girls are going? The two real problems are (1) the disappearance of good blue-collar jobs, and (2) the imbalance in the ratio of girls going to college vs. boys.
/r/MensRights01/06/13 05:33 PM
15

Maybe once more women start founding and building large companies, it will be appropriate for more of them to be on boards and top management positions.
/r/MensRights30/05/13 07:15 PM
3

Sometimes they mean you're just kidding around or not being serious.
/r/MensRights30/05/13 08:21 AM
5

Just a harbinger of things to come. As whites become a diminishing minority, people will notice they are wealthier than on average. This is because of inheritance and the opportunities that existed before that just aren't around anymore for the immigrants that continue to flood in. But many won't see it that way. Eventually there will be persecutions.
/r/MensRights27/05/13 11:46 PM
4

your ability to pick one is screwed up Whereas you can predict with confidence what anyone will be doing in ten years time?
/r/MensRights23/05/13 06:39 PM
2

Nut jobs.
/r/MensRights20/05/13 06:30 PM
195

Tell them that unless all sides of a debate are considered, they're deluding themselves; it's not a debate at all. Or just tell them to shove it. The longer I live, the more I think people just generally aren't worth the effort. The level of stupidity and willful ignorance is incredible.
/r/MensRights19/05/13 09:11 PM
14

I think it's explainable this way: When a man and women get married these days, he effectively becomes her subject in the eyes of many. He owes her duty, loyalty and responsibility. And is taxed even if he's tossed out of the castle. If he sees someone else, it's like treason. She owes him no more than a queen owes her subjects and can do whatever pleases her, including taking a lover, attempting to behead her subject with a golf club, or run her subject over with the royal carriage.
/r/MensRights17/05/13 09:54 PM
14

Time to start segregating colleges by gender again.
/r/MensRights16/05/13 07:52 PM
1

Well, it depends on whether they're already been living together long enough in a state with laws about cohabitation. His fiancee may have marital rights already.
/r/MensRights15/05/13 04:37 AM
1

Another option would be to transfer assets into someone else's possession (e.g. a trusted relative) before the marriage to hold them for you. A good example would be a house. The relative "owns" it but you live in it. If the marriage goes well, he or she can transfer assets back. If not, you can't lose what isn't officially yours.
/r/MensRights15/05/13 04:00 AM
3

I wonder what they'd have to say about women paying more into the pension system since they live longer? And more into the medical system there since they consume more of its resources?
/r/MensRights14/05/13 06:44 PM
6

Well, we have Google Glass now. Maybe soon we'll have Google Obliterate. You put on full glasses and it removes any image of a woman within your visual range, replacing it with an avatar such as the Cookie Monster or Barney or whatever else mildly repulses you. Then we can all go about our business totally ignoring each other, as would seem to be necessary for Feminine Bliss.
/r/MensRights14/05/13 04:10 AM
3

Get out. You'll start feeling better as soon as you do. Don't tell her about it. Just get out when she isn't around and so can't do anything crazy.
/r/MensRights05/05/13 05:15 AM
-3

I wonder what would happen if men gave this woman what she wants. If they all started acting as though women are just obstacles to be gotten around and otherwise ignored. I suspect the amount of female complaining would be deafening.
/r/MensRights03/05/13 11:20 PM
2

Absolutely. It sucks.
/r/MensRights02/05/13 03:03 PM
1

Of course he can, it depends on how many courses he's teaching and whether he's taught them before (i.e. has the course materials organized and lectures already prepared). It sounds like you don't realize how common this is becoming. Universities want to hire sessionals, not full-time professors. A lecturer might never know how many courses he'll be teaching next term. There's no research load, and no career progression. It also sounds like you don't hear the undercurrent of despair in his post.…
/r/MensRights02/05/13 02:59 PM
1

I wonder if this is the most practical way India can achieve birth control.
/r/MensRights30/04/13 09:58 PM
1

Couldn't a doctor tell that she was intact? Or was she already sexually active at 12? even the medical evidence did not support that she had suffered sexual abuse. So if it was impossible that she had been raped, why did he sit in jail for three years?
/r/MensRights28/04/13 08:22 PM
1

This is the sort of problem that parents of a married child face. They've worked all of their lives for what they have, and there's a real chance that Cupcake will walk away with half (or more) through divorce, after the child inherits. There are strategies they can use to prevent this, which might be applicable to the situation you describe. For example, a "lifetime trust": http://counselprotect.com/part-8-you-can-give-your-children-divorce-and-asset-protection/
/r/MensRights27/04/13 06:14 PM
6

Can be contradicted without even trying. Physically, women are absolutely inferior. They just can't compete successfully in sports against men, for example. Men are faster, stronger, hardier, and more coordinated. Creativity? Nearly all of science, art, systems of law, medicine and music is the product of men. Those two points by themselves take her absolutist statement and show it for the bullcrap it is.
/r/MensRights26/04/13 05:17 PM
3

Not to mention the enormous bias against men in the family courts.
/r/MensRights26/04/13 05:13 PM
6

You might want to point out the fact that such posters mostly get torn down rather quickly if you meet her again.
/r/MensRights24/04/13 08:23 PM
4

I see, well, if your girl gamers are such a strong and present group, there's nothing stopping them from forming their own community, writing their own games, and having their own publishers cater to them. The should go play each other in their little PC paradise and stay the hell away from the male community rather than moving in and trying to tell everyone how they should behave.
/r/MensRights24/04/13 03:28 AM
2

Now this is well said.
/r/MensRights21/04/13 03:15 PM
4

we should show their opinions respect Why should we show respect for feminist policies that actively try to put women at an advantage over men or are just plain batshit insane? For example: the growing movement that woman should not be imprisoned for criminal acts.
/r/MensRights21/04/13 03:14 PM
3

The only winners will be the lawyers.
/r/MensRights17/04/13 01:45 AM
1

can you imagine how the differing curriculum and tones between all-boys and all-girls schools would leave the boys out to dry? Why would it? Especially with the growing recognition that boys learn optimally in different ways from girls.
/r/MensRights16/04/13 12:56 AM
1

And equality is what you get in the public school system?
/r/MensRights16/04/13 12:33 AM
5

Yeah, I'm surprised there hasn't been more of a movement of people who value their sons and who have the good fortune to possess the financial means toward putting their sons into boys-only private schools.
/r/MensRights15/04/13 06:42 PM
6

It sounds like the real concern here is all the social damage the troll is doing to him.
/r/MensRights14/04/13 05:35 PM
4

But the difference is that now many women are out there working. So society still has its supply of diligent workers and won't collapse. Although the women will become increasingly upset and resentful as they bear more of the economic workload.
/r/MensRights11/04/13 06:59 PM
7

Or you could, you know, wash with soap each day.
/r/MensRights07/04/13 11:38 PM
7

I'd say Iceland is a special case. Due to your small population, democracy is actually a wieldy form of government.
/r/MensRights04/04/13 02:07 PM
2

the response is very harsh Why is this, exactly? Do people not think for themselves and make their own observations, they just blindly follow whatever they've been told? Do they just not like to be disagreed with? They don't care what the rules are, so long as they understand the rules, and they don't appreciate someone trying to change them? Are they afraid you'll actually be able to convince someone of your viewpoint?
/r/MensRights04/04/13 02:05 PM
14

Yeah, we really need to set up a "woman only" nation. Let this sort flock to it and discover that it isn't the Nirvana they seem to think it would be. Shock them awake.
/r/MensRights03/04/13 02:34 PM
3

In part, it can be attributed to how the laws seem to protect the criminals rather than the men responding to the criminals. Why intervene if you're going to be charged for doing so? Maybe you'll get off, maybe not, but only after spending a gob of money on lawyers. Maybe you'll be sued for every cent you own.
/r/MensRights01/04/13 05:04 AM
9

They're taking what they want and projecting it onto men. Women are interested in successful men. Men are interested in fun, nubile women.
/r/MensRights31/03/13 08:44 PM
7

Most men who registered for online dating websites were creeps, she said. A nice piece of misandry right there.
/r/MensRights31/03/13 08:41 PM
41

They just won't give up until sales assistants, secretaries and social workers make six figures, will they.
/r/MensRights30/03/13 08:50 PM
1

It sounds derogatory. What is a cave, other than the home of a primitive, undeveloped person?
/r/MensRights30/03/13 05:07 AM
6

Well, it's probably safe to say that Wired has alienated a good proportion of any residual readership it had. I for one won't bother to read it again.
/r/MensRights29/03/13 09:37 PM
4

'elevate' hehe... I think you meant 'alleviate'.
/r/MensRights29/03/13 01:27 AM
5

Why are men perverts just for looking at a woman's cleavage? You know, I've given up on expecting people to be driven by logic and truth. Let's face it, those are distant seconds to emotions and the impulse to defend oneself. Look at how rarely debates end in one side admitting that the other has a point on these boards, for example. I believe the answer here is that it simply isn't rational, it's what they feel. A cute guy looks and they're well pleased. Someone not so cute looks and they are r…
/r/MensRights28/03/13 09:55 PM
4

Yup. They just brought it into law.
/r/MensRights28/03/13 06:06 PM
14

The best thing I can suggest as you get older is to make sure you live with the person well in advance before any talk of engagement/marriage. Just not in B.C. Canada, where you'll be considered to be married if you cohabit for two years and a day. Another piece of advice is to look at how she treats her family and any subordinates at her workplace.
/r/MensRights28/03/13 05:58 PM
6

Typical feminist, how quickly the language becomes emotionally charged and insulting. If you can't see how arrogant it is for some woman to barge into what has, up until then, been a "man space", largely because women have scorned it, and start telling men how they should behave and how everything should be arranged to suit her, I can't help you. What's weird about the situation too is that there's nothing to prevent women from writing their own games, playing their own games, and forming their …
/r/MensRights27/03/13 08:39 AM
6

It's sexist when the operating definition of sexism seems to be "criticism of anything to do with women".
/r/MensRights27/03/13 06:52 AM
1

Domestic robots can't arrive soon enough.
/r/MensRights26/03/13 08:45 PM
4

What the history books don't tell you was how all those Vikings were escaping ball-breaking wives at home!
/r/MensRights26/03/13 03:01 AM
13

one to blame men for not changing the bulb one to blame men for trying to change the bulb instead of letting a woman do it Hehe... I like this part best.
/r/MensRights26/03/13 02:58 AM
5

This kind of crap is just unacceptable to any thinking person. It seems to me that it's coming time to just split into two societies, one of men, and one of women. Let them have their own nation. Let them stew in their own irrationality. It's the only thing that will wake them up.
/r/MensRights23/03/13 07:09 PM
2

Well, she hasn't yet. She's asking for money to go to some sort of gaming camp to supposedly learn how to make a RPG.
/r/MensRights23/03/13 06:02 PM
7

Does anyone else see this as touting "girls are better than boys, naa, naa" when it's really just a juvenile example of white knights jumping in to please the young princess? Or am I just snarling at ghosts now?
/r/MensRights23/03/13 07:22 AM
9

I'm starting to wonder whether there's a career opportunity for a woman here. She could just put out the word that, if some other woman gets out of line physically, she'll step in for $20 and end it, physically.
/r/MensRights23/03/13 07:13 AM
1

Moral of the story: get to know a woman before you ask her out?
/r/MensRights23/03/13 07:10 AM
16

The horror dates I had to indulge for the simple sake of a meal. Don't you like the way she uses men in the most mercenary way and makes herself the victim at the same time?
/r/MensRights23/03/13 07:09 AM
2

I want you to fulfill my romantic needs while constantly apologize that your gender is horrible. Hehe... so be an alpha male and a sniveling worm at the same time? How's that for cognitive dissonance?
/r/MensRights23/03/13 06:48 AM
11

"I am doing OK so I don't care that things aren't OK for other people". I think underlies about 80% of what people say in these forums.
/r/MensRights22/03/13 09:07 PM
1

These sorts of articles never offer any practical, concrete steps, do they. What are we supposed to do, start lurking in bedroom closets and alleys wearing tights and a cape, then spring out like superheroes the moment a woman says "no"? Considering how many women kick the father out of her kids lives these days, exactly while they're still impressionable, the whole thing sounds hypocritical.
/r/MensRights20/03/13 07:08 PM
21

You sound like the sort of person who puts women on pedestals and believes they can do no wrong.
/r/MensRights20/03/13 07:03 PM
5

Sounds to me like he might just have been trying to impress her.
/r/MensRights16/03/13 08:29 PM
3

I think that's a good rule of thumb. If you ask someone out on a date, you should pay.
/r/MensRights16/03/13 08:15 PM
0

It might merit the asking how the woman became a single mother to start with. Could it have something to do with her own decisions?
/r/MensRights16/03/13 06:09 AM
4

But I doubt you can deny that the sort of feminist thought represented in this image does have a foothold in society and is evidenced in the media and in political decision making. Ignoring or dismissing them is just to invite further damage to society. Look at how rape hysteria and pedophile hysteria have taken hold. They start with a small core of truth and then go to absurd extremes. Men are now being faulted just for talking in an elevator or being with a child or walking in the same directi…
/r/MensRights13/03/13 01:10 AM
9

But it is irrational to expect the world to rearrange itself to suit you in every detail.
/r/MensRights12/03/13 11:31 PM
1

Not the best source, but I don't want to spend more time on it: "that at the present time, due to the uncertainty of enforcement of agreements as written, some lawyers refuse to draft them for fear of malpractice actions" http://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/search/display/display.w3p;orderBy=_fragment_number;query=((Dataset%3Acommsen)%20SearchCategory_Phrase%3A%22committees%22)%20CommitteeName_Phrase%3A%22legal%20and%20constitutional%20legislation%20committee%22%20Questioner_Phrase%3A%22senator%…
/r/MensRights12/03/13 11:02 PM
-1

Basically, it must not prevent the transfer of wealth from the man to the woman (and most importantly, to her blood sucking lawyers).
/r/MensRights11/03/13 11:53 PM
6

She called the document “a knife in my heart from Day One.’’ Therefore give me money? “His need to be successful was more important to him than the need for me to be his wife or the mother of his children,” she said. Therefore give me money? How strong were your feelings if money makes it all better?
/r/MensRights11/03/13 11:51 PM
10

In some places, lawyers will no longer even write up prenups because they've been getting sued when the prenups are tossed out.
/r/MensRights11/03/13 11:50 PM
4

Well, let's see. Will it actually work? Has nagging people to resist their animal urges, good or bad, ever worked? Not really. Look at all the obese people being told to diet. Look at all the drug addicts being told to give up their fix. And so on. Will it just contribute to the growing resentment between men and women? Definitely. So what is the real goal here? I suspect it's to assume a position of moral superiority and berate men for the rest of time. To put the blame on all men and try to ma…
/r/MensRights11/03/13 09:03 PM
9

How long before they are claiming something like "2 in 3 women" or "9 in 10 " women or "5 in 4" women?? Soon the mere existence of a creep (namely, unattractive man) within visual range will constitute sexual assault, I suspect.
/r/MensRights11/03/13 07:42 PM
3

So? Is every boyfriend supposed to be a shrink, and diagnose his girlfriend correctly the moment her mind changes? Men cannot read minds.
/r/MensRights11/03/13 07:32 PM
7

There is no excuse for this. She should be flogged, not just jailed. An outrageous example of the pussy pass.
/r/MensRights09/03/13 01:49 AM
6

Well, maybe they've got something. Maybe they'd bitch and nag and complain until the men grew tired and gave up.
/r/MensRights08/03/13 08:16 PM
2

Well, he would be on the hook for the same sort of deception on her part: http://mensnewsdaily.com/2011/02/27/man-receives-oral-sex-ordered-to-pay-child-support/
/r/MensRights08/03/13 06:41 PM
7

So what did he do while in the back of that car that warranted dragging him out, kicking him, and tasering him again? This is an important question. I thought the back seats of police cars were basically cages, with doors that don't unlock from the inside and divided by a grate from the front seats? Once you're back there, you're effectively in a prison cell. Why should any more force need to be applied?
/r/MensRights05/03/13 06:28 PM
1

you sound as stubborn as her Actually, if you take his story literally, he doesn't. He tried to accomodate her, he tried to talk to her, and things have only gotten worse.
/r/MensRights04/03/13 08:38 PM
1

Is asking yourself how you'd feel about dying tomorrow, and finding out you largely don't care despite being non-suicidal (except for the usual sharp fear of death itself when actually facing it), an indicator of depression? Or is it just a natural part of growing older and having seen enough of the world?
/r/MensRights03/03/13 10:11 PM
7

I wouldn't worry too much about this. It could work for a few (or even several) generations of clones, but there's a good reason for sexual reproduction; filtering out of disadvantageous mutations. With this system, they'd only accumulate. Each clone would carry more mutations than its predecessor. Eventually something disfiguring or even fatal would pop up. Also, what if the woman wants more than one child? Is she going to be happy raising her own clone twice or more?
/r/MensRights26/02/13 11:17 AM
1

No mention of how women absolutely rule the ever-growing administrative (as opposed to faculty) side of universities.
/r/MensRights24/02/13 08:43 AM
4

That is why paternity testing should be mandatory upon birth. So it doesn't have to turn into an issue between husband and wife. Unless the kid isn't his.
/r/MensRights21/02/13 06:06 PM
1

Not stalls. Literally one-person washrooms, complete with a sink, mirror, toilet bowl, etc. Anyhow, stalls generally have the problem of imperfect privacy. Cracks between the door and the wall that someone can be glimpsed through in passing, gaps beneath the door or over top that a fearful woman would be suspicious of, etc. Also, as a guy, would you want to share a washroom with women? Think of how long they take. Now imagine needing to go and finding every stall occupied.
/r/MensRights19/02/13 11:18 AM
3

I think unisex bathrooms (except for the one-person-at-a-time sort with a locking door) aren't really welcomed by anyone. They're just a misguided cost-cutting idea.
/r/MensRights19/02/13 12:18 AM
21

The quote, to me, is just pointing a finger at men. "More to promote marriage"? And who is being blamed in the media these days for falling marriage rates? Men for not "manning up". Men for not being willing to commit. No examination of the huge elephants in the room: (1) women are earning more so it becomes harder for them to marry up, (2) men are becoming aware of the frequency of divorce and its financially ruinous effect, and (3) men are becoming aware of the ease with which their children a…
/r/MensRights18/02/13 09:04 AM
15

First off, if you enter into a relationship thinking, "what can I get out of this?" Then yes, you will get a divorce. Any relationship, marriage or not, involves being selfless. Yes, but we're not talking about a single impending marriage here, we're viewing the institution dispassionately and finding it wanting.
/r/MensRights17/02/13 06:54 PM
6

The thing is that men don't go after alimony the way women do. It's a matter of pride. Also, society pours derision on men who live off of women. So instead, they'll often settle things more equitably (and without the lawyers getting rich). It's women who often seem to have no respect or regard for their ex-husband and try to screw him for every penny. Also, since the children generally are awarded to the woman, he'll still have to pay child support. So say she makes $50k and he makes $40k. They…
/r/MensRights17/02/13 06:45 PM
6

You should demand a paternity test. If she was willing to deceive you this way, who knows what else may have been going on. Consult a lawyer. Maybe if you leave your job before the child is born, you won't be on the hook for so much child support. You can always resume working later. But in the end, you might just have to accept being a father. If the child is yours, you might regret not making reasonable accommodations later.
/r/MensRights17/02/13 08:26 AM
13

Chivalry is more than "being nice" to a woman, it's about putting her on a pedestal and treating her like some higher being.
/r/MensRights16/02/13 07:32 PM
1

Why are they always so greedy? $900,000 a year and she won't ease off a whit?
/r/MensRights16/02/13 09:21 AM
4

We seem to be moving toward a society in which men don't have a right to father their own children. The woman does what she wants and he pays. Even more so in France.
/r/MensRights15/02/13 07:29 PM
26

"The world should revolve around and adjust itself to my feelings, rational or not".
/r/MensRights15/02/13 05:45 AM
10

I think this disrespect for the common man comes from the top as well as from women. The people in power just see men as disposable commodities for use in business and in war.
/r/MensRights12/02/13 12:56 AM
5

Why buy the cow when you can get the milk for free? Well, women can nearly all get the stud (not cow), sort of, for a limited period of time in their lives. The stud being those 20% or so of men that make their hormones dance. "Sort of" meaning that in most cases such men will sleep with them but not stay with them. "Limited period of time" meaning while they're still young and physically attractive. A harsh reality. If that's all a woman wants, if she'd rather be single than mate with any of th…
/r/MensRights04/02/13 05:55 AM
3

To someone who would write something like that, there's probably literally nothing her poor sap of a husband could do that she wouldn't interpret similarly.
/r/MensRights03/02/13 07:53 PM
7

Any strong friendship between a pair of men comes under heavy suspicion of being gay these days. Especially from women.
/r/MensRights28/01/13 02:17 PM
19

Who was the idiot who decided to be her second husband?
/r/MensRights28/01/13 02:15 PM
38

Except that judges commonly throw out prenups.
/r/MensRights09/01/13 06:53 AM
6

Excellent point.
/r/MensRights06/01/13 10:19 PM
3

One problem is (so far as I understand it) that it only takes is an accusation to put an arrest on your record. Even the police drop it immediately after that, prospective employers will hold it against you.
/r/MensRights04/01/13 09:41 PM
41

A link to the article about the latter incidence of undesired pregnancy: http://mensnewsdaily.com/2011/02/27/man-receives-oral-sex-ordered-to-pay-child-support/
/r/MensRights04/01/13 02:07 AM
2

None of the main characters (including Gandalf) were human, certainly. Hmm... hobbits, elves, orcs, goblins, dwarves, wargs, eagles, stone giants, trolls, wizards... I think you're right. The closest would be Elrond (half-elf, half-human).
/r/MensRights31/12/12 10:08 PM
3

She was a sort of "behind the scenes" character that the movie shifted to the forefront. I don't know about the current publication, but the original had a set of appendices at the back of "The Return of the King". Her story was told there.
/r/MensRights31/12/12 10:03 PM
1

Isn't that a hopeless idea, though? Nearly every woman will reflexively vote against such a candidate, whereas men will split their votes as always, so he has no hope of ever being elected.
/r/MensRights30/12/12 09:10 PM
3

Yeah, well, I wouldn't be surprised.
/r/MensRights24/12/12 09:50 PM
14

From the comments: After all, without feminists we wouldn't be voting or allowed any job a man can do. Sorry my dears, but you are not the feminists your grandmothers were. Don't take credit for their accomplishments.
/r/MensRights24/12/12 08:06 PM
5

In other words, the bureaucrats are too gutless to take a stand. I guess that isn't surprising. The ones that make it to the top of the ant heap didn't get there without covering their asses all the way.
/r/MensRights22/12/12 07:40 PM
-1

Instead of a smartass reply, just get it right the next time please, so people reading your missives don't have to ponder their meaning for longer than they're worth.
/r/MensRights20/12/12 11:42 PM
8

Here's an illusion that needs to be dispelled: the value of a pre-nup. Pre-nups do not help. Judges commonly throw them out. A second illusion: she will never change. She can seem like the most loving and respectful woman, and then in ten years be an ice queen ruthlessly trying to eviscerate you.
/r/MensRights09/12/12 07:18 PM
21

I think at-fault divorce should be restored as soon as kids appear, and maintained until they're grown up. Let's get rid of these destructive divorces of convenience. If a woman wants to dump her husband because she's bored, too bad, and vice versa. If she goes out and cheats on him and he applies for divorce based on that, he gets the kids and she gets squat, and vice versa if he cheats. At-fault only until they're adults. Raise the kids first.
/r/MensRights08/12/12 08:46 PM
1

Seriously? You couldn't run a Google search for yourself? Look here: http://www.divorce-lawyer-source.com/faq/emotional/who-initiates-divorce-men-or-women.html They succinctly sum up the situation, quoting the National Center for Health Statistics and the American Law and Economics Review. Overall, about two-thirds of the time it's the wife (i.e. it's two times more likely she'll pull the plug than he will). For college-educated couples, 90% of the time it's the wife.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 06:30 AM
3

Here's a simplified example. He owns 100%. They divorce and both get half. But the ex-husband also has to make giant monthly payments to his ex-wife based on his previous income. Business takes a down turn. Soon enough, he has to resort to selling blocks of shares. Guess who holds the majority interest now?
/r/MensRights07/12/12 01:24 AM
3

"Put yourself in her shoes. Marriage seem like a better deal now?" This little quote could mean not even necessarily "marry because of what they can get", so much as generally not risking financial devastation to begin with. The way men do when they get married. Sometimes divorce just happens Divorces require a decision to happen. More often than not, it's the woman that pulls the plug. Another thing men should keep in mind before entering into an arrangement that could leave them destitute for …
/r/MensRights07/12/12 01:15 AM
1

Maybe not dominated by feminism per se (in the sense of having NOW members as news anchors) so much as propagating without examination feminist messages that have been absorbed by society. Some good, but some not good at all (e.g. the whole men bad women good thing you see oozing out of every ad and sitcom, e.g every newspaper seems to have a dedicated female columnist such as Margaret Wente telling us how superior women are, how everything is the fault of men, and even how men are irrelevant, e…
/r/MensRights30/11/12 06:39 PM
12

I don't know about men's rights activists, but the feminist extremists seem to have an awful lot of influence on society. They've successfully managed to create the pedophile hysteria, for example, to the point where people call the police when they see a father alone with his young daughter in a park.
/r/MensRights29/11/12 05:51 PM
5

How do you win against a moron, though? They never back down, no matter how many points you make and how many of their "points" you disprove. They'll use every trick in the book, from all the debating fallacies, to outright lying, to diverting the argument, to finally resorting to ad hominem attacks (if indeed they didn't just start with them or include them all along).
/r/MensRights27/11/12 07:16 PM
2

On the other hand, simply absorbing abuse leads to a slow death of the soul. The fight training probably is a good idea.
/r/MensRights22/11/12 08:22 PM
-2

Possibly you could see a lawyer and start a discrimination lawsuit. Some lawyers will do pro bono work. Just pick the most obvious example of sexism you can find. The company might give you a job if you agree to drop the lawsuit (? maybe, not sure). EDIT: This is being downvoted, why? Women use the law to their advantage in this way all the time, why shouldn't the OP?
/r/MensRights22/11/12 08:11 PM
2

So, you disagree but you also took legal steps to protect yourself and won't actually be getting married? Sounds like you've already taken my advice.
/r/MensRights21/11/12 05:19 PM
9

There are plenty of women who just want a nice normal person Sure, but what happens to Cupcake later on, ten years into the marriage? Maybe her divorced friends start telling her how horrible men are, and how they made out like bandits from the divorce. They'll even gloat about how they got everything except his shirt. Meanwhile, Cupcake might be feeling bored, and maybe even resentful (whether her husband deserves it or not). After all, naturally it's all his fault that she's not perfectly happ…
/r/MensRights21/11/12 07:32 AM
1

You don't mind them, but do you want them as mates?
/r/MensRights21/11/12 07:27 AM
4

Be cautious in the workplace. Don't date your female co-workers, flirt with them, joke with them, or whatever. Keep it businesslike. Don't ever try to rescue a lost child directly, unless it is in imminent danger and there's just no choice. Let a woman find the child. Just get out of there; anything you do might draw suspicion. An accusation can be as damaging as actually being a criminal.
/r/MensRights19/11/12 09:35 PM
0

Ableism? Are they officially convinced of the superiority of their gender now? Is it part of the feminist platform now? All from the endless stream of media items based on junk headlines and qualifiers at the bottom of the article that they don't bother to read?
/r/MensRights18/11/12 10:45 PM
1

So, you're taking one sample and concluding from it that a strong trend does not exist? Personal experience does not necessarily reflect an overall reality. Also, the existence of exceptions, even a strong minority of exceptions, does not mean that a large sub-population that exhibits specific common traits cannot exist.
/r/MensRights16/11/12 07:00 PM
1

Because improving the parking spots themselves and better streetlights are just out of the question?
/r/MensRights09/11/12 02:53 PM
2

But that can lead to the death of this child, even: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/england/coventry_warwickshire/4837614.stm During the three-day hearing at Stratford-upon-Avon Town Hall, the court heard how a bricklayer had passed a toddler, believed to be Abigail, walking alone near the nursery. But he did not stop to help in case he was suspected of abducting her.
/r/MensRights07/11/12 01:27 AM
5

How often do people actually negotiate their salaries, anyhow? Maybe at the upper end. For the rank and file, all the big corporations have a pay curve of some sort. You don't negotiate with your manager for a raise. They go through an obscure "process" involving many people and then tell you what it will be.
/r/MensRights05/11/12 09:09 PM
4

You forgot option 4: She backs down and won't confront you directly, but turns on you and starts a campaign of character assassination. Soon all of the office won't talk to you, look at you in hallways, or say hello. The boss starts hearing about how miserable you are, too.
/r/MensRights05/11/12 07:47 PM
6

I usually just take them aside so we are talking one on one - I've found this very important to do as it keeps you from getting ganged up on by the rest of the employees. This sounds like excellent advice. For dealing with most anyone, actually. If they keep up after that I just fire them for not following directions, not for sexism. Ok, so this is why you have leverage. If you're a co-worker, they can freely brush you off.
/r/MensRights05/11/12 07:36 PM
46

Quoting from the article: Well, I guess it depends on the women involved. You gotta get by the best you can right? If the guy has a good job then why not, he can afford it. If I got pregnant I know which ones out of all the guys I have dated that would be good dads and which ones wouldn't. It's all about choice... I think it's actually quite cool that a mother has the right to choose who the father is it allows them to make the right decision. Don't you ever wish you could cover a mistake with a…
/r/MensRights05/11/12 03:34 AM
281

Two things are apparent here. She's already a "victim" according to the report. And the crime was that she "felt threatened". Can I have the police hunt for people too based on my feelings?
/r/MensRights26/10/12 05:57 AM
5

Someone made a joke about men? I don't care. One joke? Neither do I. People consistently run men down and bash them in every outlet of the media and it's considered to be acceptable, even deserved, humor? So we should stay silent? Count me out. Someone made a form of social commentary and didn't consider your delicate feelings? Constant male-bashing and negative portrayal of males in the media is a very potent sort of social commentary. But, in your view we shouldn't fight or protest against it,…
/r/MensRights26/10/12 02:12 AM
11

Also, it ain't never gonna change. If it doesn't change, here's what we will end up with in society, in my view: Women will all pursue the "alpha" males (the ones that make their hormones dance, regardless of suitability for being a father or husband) They won't land them (mostly) but they will have their children. Women will resort to sperm banks if necessary to have the "alpha" males' children. Women will ignore or disparage the rank-and-file beta male that has built society up to what it is t…
/r/MensRights25/10/12 11:17 PM
7

Actually, I wouldn't blame a presidential candidate. Think of how many hands they have to shake. If every time was one step from a bone crusher, they'd have no hand left after a while. tl;dr Hank is an idiot.
/r/MensRights24/10/12 06:09 PM
0

But neither do most women challenge the feminist extremists who operate in the school system, the family courts, in university Womyns' Studies departments, and the media.
/r/MensRights18/10/12 06:51 PM
1

You do know that feminists Which feminists are those? They're all over the map these days.
/r/MensRights13/10/12 04:48 PM
20

But owning a copy of "50 Shades of Grey" makes a woman current.
/r/MensRights12/10/12 06:45 PM
-1

Turn math into a video game, and boys will excel.
/r/MensRights07/10/12 07:24 PM
1

The more attractive they are, the less they have any incentive to lift a finger. There's a steady stream of guys approaching them out of pure instinct (ones too blinkered to resent the bias of the situation or who just don't care), so why should they take any chance of their own on some average guy without the confidence to approach them?
/r/MensRights07/10/12 05:08 PM
25

"Man up" is the feminist way of saying "change your behavior to suit our priorities, not yours".
/r/MensRights05/10/12 04:52 PM
18

I hope all the men stop busting their asses to make the company successful there.
/r/MensRights30/09/12 03:39 AM
1

find me a man whose wife neither works nor takes care of the kids or the house, volunteers nor is willing to even drive anybody anywhere Look at truly rich households.
/r/MensRights29/09/12 09:53 PM
2

At least partly because a lot of people look on money as society's scorecard and unemployed men are not ranking highly. With women, not so much.
/r/MensRights29/09/12 05:23 PM
2

It is also crazy that it infects the liberal elites the most, in fact they develop and implement each new wave of political correctness. I figure these people are the same nosy meddlers who would try to tell everyone what to do in a small community, but have been frustrated by the anonymity of the cities. So instead they implement it at a national scale. And of course are never satisfied, since it is the process of manipulating people, rather than the outcome, which fulfills them.
/r/MensRights29/09/12 05:17 PM
0

Not any individual man, but the sum of all men working and paying taxes to subsidize womens' needs. A prime example being the recent taxpayer-funded birth control for women. All those beta males paying in so Cupcake and her friends can go off and ride the alpha cock carousel.
/r/MensRights21/09/12 08:46 AM
1

This incident between you and her, her threat, proves she doesn't give a shit about you or your well being, in fact she seems more than willing to destroy you, your family, and your life just because she isn't getting her way. This. It sounds like you need to kick her out of your life.
/r/MensRights18/09/12 07:18 AM
6

Wtf? Is that when the trannie bars empty or something? You can't claim it's remotely typical.
/r/MensRights15/09/12 12:09 AM
18

It's simple to understand from the female perspective. They're (1) advertising for Mr. Right, and (2) all other women. The rest of humanity (namely all the other men) can go to Hades as far as they're concerned; they're just supposed to shut up, not look, and be invisible.
/r/MensRights15/09/12 12:06 AM
13

Have you ever considered that women might be harassing men by wearing more revealing clothing? Knowing full well the impact the female form has on them? No, when a woman does whatever she wants in the face of society's disapproval, she's "empowered". If a man does, he's a criminal.
/r/MensRights15/09/12 12:00 AM
19

"We are girls, do you think we are interested in this?" So (1) it sounds like they're ready to leave the details to men here, and (2) it sounds like they expect every other girl to feel the same way about it.
/r/MensRights08/09/12 03:09 PM
5

It's not like all women are whipping around guns trying to find the next guy to screw over. 50% divorce rate, 70% initiated by Cupcake. Out of the remaining marriages, you have to ask in how many the man feels miserably trapped because he knows it's doom if he wants a divorce. I don't blame anyone who decides to wait until the courts are fixed first. If enough men go on a marriage strike, society will be forced to address the issues instead of scoffing at them. Also, men sign up all the time bec…
/r/MensRights06/09/12 12:48 AM
2

People can do fucked up things - regardless of gender. Maybe so, but in this case they (women) are backed with the full weight of the out-of-control "justice" system. It's little different than an arrangement in which one partner holds a loaded gun to the other partner's head at all times, and is rewarded financially if she pulls the trigger. What sane man would sign up?
/r/MensRights06/09/12 12:12 AM
7

This would be illegal. Inmates are allowed a certain amount of privacy and that must be so. Then offer inmates the option of requesting surveillance. Better a camera nearby than having to fight Bubba the 350 pound gorilla on a daily basis.
/r/MensRights01/09/12 06:28 PM
0

The universe isn't static (i.e. unchanging), by the way. I think the word you were looking for is deterministic. "God does not play dice" and all that.
/r/MensRights26/08/12 09:55 AM
2

The mere fact that the writer of this piece of trash would ask such a question demonstrates an utter lack of understanding of all the contributions men have made since humanity left the caves. They only built all of civilization, you know. Nor is there any acknowledgement of how choices of single mothers are subsidized by the state. Maybe she's chucked Dad out of the lives of her children, abetted by the legal system, but somewhere some man is working and paying taxes toward the services she is …
/r/MensRights26/08/12 09:48 AM
0

You're living in a dream world, surrounded by illusions of how you wish life would be.
/r/MensRights21/08/12 08:05 PM
19

Ok, that's long enough. Congratulations on a happy marriage.
/r/MensRights12/08/12 02:52 AM
0

Are you recently married?
/r/MensRights12/08/12 02:49 AM
20

So what, exactly, would you have been advocating in medieval times. For women. The right to become a soldier and die in some obscure war to advance a nobleman's political objectives? The right to maybe do backbreaking labour in the field instead of in the home? In fact, sometimes they did. Those were the career choices back then. The right to vote? Except there was no voting, for men or women, in most societies. The right to screw around outside of wedlock and have children with indeterminable f…
/r/MensRights03/08/12 05:33 PM
1

I'd be tempted to take out an ad in a major newspaper that simply describes what she did and includes her name and a picture. Sticking to the absolute, verifiable facts.
/r/MensRights27/07/12 05:03 AM
4

Alright, not all of you. A substantial subset.
/r/MensRights02/07/12 08:57 PM
0

More like women want drama. They want relationship issues to go on about with their friends too. It's just how they're made.
/r/MensRights02/07/12 07:00 PM
10

Probably by "sucks in bed", it doesn't matter what he does or doesn't do. It's just that his presence doesn't make her tingle to begin with and he doesn't take charge in the way she'd like, either in the sack or in the relationship.
/r/MensRights02/07/12 06:58 PM
2

And if it were some presentation about women and how their liberation has damaged society and caused all sorts of problems and how they should be set back or even culled? Would you approve for sake of the discussions it would provoke?
/r/MensRights20/06/12 12:10 AM
2

the cancer progressed at only half the speed as the control group So not a cure, not beaten. Certainly this is good news and a harbinger of what we can hope for from medical research, but don't oversell it.
/r/MensRights05/06/12 08:09 AM
2

If it can be used to excuse murder, then maybe women should be locked up or at least watched during their depression.
/r/MensRights04/06/12 11:29 PM
3

In our bizzaro PC feminist police state, a police officer can beat a woman on the street with video evidence for no acceptable reason and still just get a slap on the wrist, yet have his career wrecked by a simple accusation at home.
/r/MensRights29/05/12 07:06 PM
2

Some people compensate by buying the biggest pickup truck available and driving like reckless idiots who try to intimidate everyone around them.
/r/MensRights17/05/12 03:42 AM
2

On the other hand, men have all the same chromosomes that women do (even if one isn't a double chromosome), plus one extra. Many of the genes in one or the other of a woman's two X chromosomes are silenced, too, so that they don't have two copies of the gene being expressed. Who is to say that doesn't mean that men are genetically superior to women?
/r/MensRights17/05/12 12:17 AM
3

The implication is that women, by engaging in certain behaviour, ask to be assaulted, I'd say the implication exists only in certain prickly-pear minds. They're not asking to be assaulted with such behaviours, they're putting themselves at greater risk with such behaviours. What people react to is the stupidity or apparent naiveity involved, in the same way they'd react to the stupidity of someone driving a car known to have faulty brakes.
/r/MensRights10/05/12 05:53 PM
2

~80% of women in America initiate divorce. For the record, this statement is incorrect. I believe what you meant is that ~80% of divorces are initiated by women.
/r/MensRights07/05/12 06:42 AM
2

The problem with your reasoning is that it assumes it's alright to seize upon any advantage or opportunity that comes your way. This may work as a survival strategy but (most) people have some degree of moral sense as well. If they know the advantage they are receiving is injust and unfair, they're not going to feel comfortable with it. Some of them will decide that those being discriminated against must somehow deserve it, then, to try to justify their advantage and become comfortable. (You oft…
/r/MensRights05/05/12 03:35 PM
4

A 35 year old man with some savings, possibly a house, and a good job is a ripe economic fruit to be plucked.
/r/MensRights26/04/12 06:41 AM
1

I guess the pay depends on where you live. In Ontario (Canada), teachers get a very comfortable middle-class salary and wonderful pensions as well. It's to the point where people working in the private sector (and suffering from cutbacks) are getting upset at having to support the gold-plated public service here.
/r/MensRights14/04/12 08:55 PM
2

There's a total lack of abundance of male teachers in primary schools, namely during the boys' most important formative years. Segregation would provide several advantages: It would bring male teachers back into the primary school system. Without female students, male teachers wouldn't have to fear that little Cupcake would accuse them of sexual assault because she didn't like the score on her math test. It would allow curricula tailored to boys' best ways of learning. It would remove some of th…
/r/MensRights14/04/12 08:12 PM
4

When will someone develop some software to screen out juvenile idiots? You know, something like a "Norton Anti-Moron Edition". Anyone types something along the lines of "hur hur u r al assholes shut up faggot" and the computer shuts down until the parents come home to enter their password.
/r/MensRights14/04/12 07:54 PM
1

Male teachers for male students. Toss the boy bashing feminists out of their lives, even at the cost of segregation by gender.
/r/MensRights14/04/12 06:46 PM
7

Locking stupid away can prevent more stupidity, though.
/r/MensRights10/04/12 04:10 PM
2

This.
/r/MensRights06/04/12 07:16 PM
0

But they can't go around and talk about how they are doing so much better than men in college when the area they are dominating is humanities and liberal arts But also medicine, law and accounting.
/r/MensRights29/03/12 08:42 AM
3

If anything, Wikipedia has a feminist bias.
/r/MensRights28/03/12 06:20 AM
19

A subsequent investigation by the Office of the Police Complaint Commissioner found the officer's action was reasonable and necessary. It would be nice if the papers would stop publishing these statements. We all know that the police are cleared automatically. It's insulting to our intelligence.
/r/MensRights27/03/12 04:23 PM
1

First of all, let me say I love this show. I think the writers have moments of brilliance, and the actors really carry it off. Especially Jim Parsons! But yes, it reflects modern society, with Penny off riding the alpha carousel and just not getting that tingling feeling from the beta males (next door or otherwise). She had grave doubts about dating Leonard, until against expectation, his surprise kiss made her tingle too.
/r/MensRights26/03/12 04:40 AM
3

You can't reason with an unreasonable person. However, one thing I've noticed is that while people will fight you to the death during the argument itself, later on they occasionally display some changes in their thinking.
/r/MensRights18/03/12 05:27 PM
3

I don't agree. I think men need to be able to distinguish themselves from women. There needs to be a positive masculine ideal for men to strive towards, one that comes with respect (something society certainly isn't giving men these days). Otherwise, men are demotivated.
/r/MensRights18/03/12 06:21 AM
-1

I don't see anything "traditional" about men supporting feminism, beyond opposing simple inequality. If anything, a "traditional" man probably has a stay-at-home wife. Manginas betray their own gender to serve as useful idiots for gender feminists and female supremacists.
/r/MensRights14/03/12 06:48 AM
1

Maybe the bot should wait a few minutes before kicking in, since obviously there won't be a lot of comments to try a switcheroo on in just a few minutes of time.
/r/MensRights12/03/12 12:25 AM
4

He seemed to have no alternative, and had already put up with it for years. Appeals to authority didn't work. There's such a thing as a right to defend oneself, too. Was he supposed to continue letting them grind away at his sense of self worth? There's no good answer. I suppose a physical response was wrong, but I feel little pity for the girls involved.
/r/MensRights05/03/12 07:10 AM
1

NONE of those things is problematic at all. I don't believe anyone can say this with 100% confidence, or even close to it. It's tampering with a complex system and it hasn't been done yet. Engineering and science both often meet with unexpected results when attempting new things.
/r/MensRights05/03/12 03:08 AM
5

Women actually commented on that article in droves, saying what a load of balls it was and how anti-women that paper is What is your point here? Woman will do the same for every single article or blog post or whatever that suggests they're less than perfect in any way. That's why advertisers, for example, have to tip toe along and always make men the butt of the humour; if they dared to target a woman, a substantial portion of female audience flips out.
/r/MensRights04/03/12 06:59 PM
5

Women aren't actually treated like special protected princesses every day. You really have no idea, do you.
/r/MensRights04/03/12 06:42 PM
15

If you do believe in equality, then you do have some responsibility. Seeing as anything a man says is dismissed as "mansplaining" or misogyny.
/r/MensRights04/03/12 06:37 PM
1

It still has senses, even if the environment is muted. The mother moves about. It experiences sounds and touch sensations, warmth, the beating of the mother's heart, some elasticity when it kicks. You don't want to grow the fetus in what amounts to a sensory deprivation tank. Maybe they can eventually learn to simulate what has to be a complex environment, but at the cost of how many children first?
/r/MensRights04/03/12 03:08 PM
-5

They possibly wouldn't lead to psychologically healthy children. The fetus doesn't just draw nutrients from the mother during pregnacy, it interacts with her in different ways.
/r/MensRights04/03/12 03:49 AM
1

It's a contest of "who's the bigger victim". The judge's head must be threatening to explode.
/r/MensRights03/03/12 11:36 PM
2

Surely the men that make up the Australian government wouldn't vote for this. Even if they don't give a single crap about men in general, surely they wouldn't want to stick their own heads in a noose?
/r/MensRights01/03/12 05:19 AM
2

Apparently the fish are supposed to jump out of the water and into the boat.
/r/MensRights01/03/12 04:36 AM
1

Rejecting ideas while not providing alternatives ends up in doing nothing. Anyhow, I'm not missing your point. It would be wonderful if we did have a Sorting Hat to divide children into programs that best suited their particular learning abilities. I just don't believe that it's practical; it would take too many resources to run all the different programs (not to mention parents getting up in arms over the division assigned to their children). And it would be disruptive to a common class room en…
/r/MensRights27/02/12 10:37 PM
1

So, because it's not a perfect solution, you'd prefer to do nothing? Let's just argue down any attempt and leave things as they are until the perfect answer is found (which will be never)? I haven't heard any practical alternatives here. Also, I think it's clear that girls don't really need more help at this point. Just keep teaching them as is being done; they're succeeding just fine.
/r/MensRights27/02/12 05:56 PM
2

How about treating each child as an individual? That would work for parents who can afford private tutors, but it's not practical in the public schools. Teachers have to deal with class rooms of children, not individuals. They can't provide much individual attention or operate individually tailored programs. You'll notice nowhere did I say the solution was to expect all children to behave like the girl stereotype. But that is how they're being treated in the current system. Sit still, be quiet, …
/r/MensRights25/02/12 04:22 AM
2

Well, until they design a Sorting Hat, having a separate system individual to each gender sounds better to me than the "throw them all together and demand they be stereotypic girls; smack 'em with Ritalin if they aren't" system in place right now. There will be outliers who are not well served, but not the alienation of an entire gender.
/r/MensRights25/02/12 01:08 AM
3

There really should be some kind of deterrent to deceiving men about paternity. Like a mandatory paternity test at birth.
/r/MensRights24/02/12 05:09 AM
9

Men are already modifying their behavior to avoid accusations of paedophilia. You just don't talk to children who aren't yours any more, except in well-defined settings (such as being a coach of a team). If you see a lost little girl, you're best advised to ask a woman to go tend to her; if you do it yourself, you become vulnerable to accusations of trying to abduct her. And so on.
/r/MensRights22/02/12 07:52 AM
3

It looks like we're moving toward a society in which only ~20-40% of men get to procreate. Many woman who can't have an "alpha" male's commitment will still go ahead and have his child, counting on the government for support. Or even share him with other women (polygamy). This doesn't make for a stable society, because you end up with a vast pool of pissed off men who have little reason to support society (which transfers money from them into the pockets of single mothers to support female choic…
/r/MensRights22/02/12 12:14 AM
7

Exactly.
/r/MensRights20/02/12 03:32 AM
10

It really would be an interesting and useful exercise to set up some woman-only nation somewhere. Let the hard-core feminists flock there and build their perfect society. Let them function without men to do all of the dangerous, dirty work and without men to blame for all of their ills. I suspect their nation would implode without male chumps to support the infrastructure and nanny government.
/r/MensRights17/02/12 04:13 AM
12

Why are the police able to turn off the dash cameras? Is it to save space on disk? I find that hard to believe, given how capacious hard drives have become. So why aren't the cameras always on? Why aren't the contents of dash cameras received and archived by the independent oversight, instead of the police themselves? Or at least, automatic copies?
/r/MensRights14/02/12 11:14 PM
4

To me, it's not any individual joke, it's the absolutely relentless nature of the same man-stupid/woman-smart, man-buttwhipped/woman-holds-the-leash sort of satire with nothing else to alleviate it. It's like a form of water torture; the first drops are easily borne, enjoyable even, but after a while, the uneven drips hitting your forehead drive you mad. Now even little daughters are setting Daddy straight and rolling their eyes at his incompetence. That's how marginalized dads are becoming in s…
/r/MensRights10/02/12 02:22 AM
2

Some real gems there.
/r/MensRights09/02/12 03:09 AM
5

Not just a troll, a misogynist, a loser living in his parents' basement, the owner of a small dick, etc. Shaming language and ad hominem attacks is what they do.
/r/MensRights08/02/12 07:33 PM
3

I wouldn't be surprised that if you left both chimps and bonobos in their natural environments, and came back in a few million years, chimps would have built a civilization and bonobos would still be peacefully humping in the trees.
/r/MensRights08/02/12 03:15 PM
1

Here's an interesting page, although it would be better if it provided citations: http://www.drheller.com/divorcemyths.html
/r/MensRights08/02/12 12:49 AM
5

It's not derailing your post, it's directly addressing it. The term "female" is applicable when the vast majority of the female respondents replied in a consistent way.
/r/MensRights06/02/12 11:42 PM
-4

After reading this, I went to the article and looked through the comments section. Nearly all of the posters with feminine names tried to defend this behaviour and shift the blame onto the men. None of them identified themselves as being feminists.
/r/MensRights06/02/12 10:57 PM
1

The issue here is the fraud involved, where the female partner claims she is on birth control, while her actual intent is to become pregnant and secure twenty years of financial support from the unwitting male.
/r/MensRights06/02/12 10:55 PM
12

You start with the axiom that "it's never the woman's fault". Then all they say follows from that. We know the marriage is likely to end in divorce Actually, it depends on economic status. Divorce is more likely if the family isn't making much money. Nevertheless, one has to wonder how many miserable husbands are ruled over by wives wielding the threat of divorce and financial ruin.
/r/MensRights06/02/12 06:01 PM
5

Should be titled "Boys become doormats when they..."
/r/MensRights31/01/12 08:12 PM
35

This supports the notion of female hypergamy; namely all the women pursuing 20% of the males.
/r/MensRights26/01/12 04:28 PM
4

Consult with a lawyer as soon as possible on how to protect yourself. It's sad that it's come to this, but you have to think of yourself before the child here, because your life is in far more danger. If you won't do that, have you tried just talking to her? Ask her why she is doing it and explain that your job is to protect her, not interfere with her.
/r/MensRights22/01/12 02:59 PM
1

Not a fit parent, in my opinion.
/r/MensRights21/01/12 04:53 PM
3

feminism tends to ignore issues facing men, and that's really shitty of it as well Not just ignore; they actively create them.
/r/MensRights15/01/12 09:34 PM
8

It took them over half an hour to admit it wasn't just an electrical problem. This while the ship was listing increasingly heavily. How much trust would you put in the crew by then?
/r/MensRights15/01/12 03:47 PM
12

Well, I'm sure your typical parents will want priority to be given to their children. Sum up across parents and it's an overall effect.
/r/MensRights15/01/12 03:44 PM
12

Apparently in Hillary's view, it's better to be dead than have to raise your children.
/r/MensRights15/01/12 03:42 PM
5

So there you go. His life was wrecked by her accusation. By your reasoning, she should be put in jail for life.
/r/MensRights14/01/12 10:40 PM
2

No kidding. What a bunch of one-sided bullcrap.
/r/MensRights08/01/12 12:53 PM
2

I doubt there is more to the story, given that a court reversed the university's decision and ordered $15000 in damages be paid to Dr. Said. This in today's PC environment. It was a case of political correctness gone mad.
/r/MensRights07/01/12 05:14 PM
3

Because feminists created such institutions as VAWA and the current situation in the family courts that blatantly discriminate against men? And they fight against any attempt to reform them, such as protecting the identity of a man accused of rape until he's convicted? Feminism has created the laundry list of anti-male issues that need to be set to right. As for hatred, what can you say, except that any criticism, no matter how specific or reasonable, of feminism, feminists or women in general i…
/r/MensRights28/12/11 09:38 AM
4

I don't think they're preventing the donation, but they want to make sure a disease isn't being donated along with it. With isn't unreasonable.
/r/MensRights20/12/11 07:17 PM
1

You can't win with companies and HR departments. Stick your neck out and it'll be chopped off. I agree the situation sucks but you're basically asking him to turn himself into a martyr and sacrifice his prospects at that company to only possibly save someone else (maybe she'd just hire another woman). The point is that he's a guy. If one of the women were to file a complaint, it would be a different story, I think. Hmm, a woman filing a complaint about a woman. It might make their heads explode,…
/r/MensRights19/12/11 09:12 PM
3

I'd recommend not saying anything. The deck is stacked against you. Just look for another job. It sounds like your company is large enough that you could even apply for an internal position and get away from her. If she asks why you're leaving, tell her "how's that for initiative".
/r/MensRights19/12/11 08:46 PM
4

Not just a few hours of inconvenience. Their reputations have been smeared through the community. People don't forget black marks, even if it's determined later that they're not guilty. This is especially true for rape accusations, for example. Women will still suspect the accused of being a rapist, not matter how definitively the courts state otherwise, and it will follow the accused man around wherever he goes. Not to mention how humiliating treatment by the police can be, and how aggressive t…
/r/MensRights19/12/11 07:16 PM
1

What can you do? Why help the police at all? Just keep your head down and keep walking.
/r/MensRights19/12/11 01:36 AM
1

Yes, and television is populated with overly sexualized females too. So are movies. So are fashion shows. There's nothing unique to video games here. Nor do I hear anyone complaining about how men are portrayed in the romance novels (i.e. female porn) that so many women like to consume. Maybe they should, just to balance the anti-video-gaming bullcrap. What is it about the idea of comic books and video games expanding their audience to not scare off more females that seems to bother you so much?…
/r/MensRights18/12/11 06:01 PM
8

Part of the problem is that we hear so much about violence against women, in the most strident tones, all of the time. Then a wife does something just as ugly (cutting off her husband's penis and throwing it into a garbage grinder) and women LAUGH and CHORTLE about it on major TV programs, WITHOUT CENSURE. No censure, no disagreement, no indication that radical feminism isn't just silently approved of by the majority of feminists! They're end up representing all women because (1) they're so publ…
/r/MensRights17/12/11 12:58 AM
1

Sorry, but the divorce rate (portion of marriages ending in divorce) has not been a constant: http://www.google.ca/imgres?q=graph+percentages+of+marriages+ending+in+divorce&hl=en&gbv=2&tbm=isch&tbnid=DjDZ5xXs8DgzAM:&imgrefurl=http://stateofourunions.org/2009/si-divorce.php&docid=ANkO_-vAX8i7LM&imgurl=http://stateofourunions.org/2009/graphs/chart_14_SocialDivorce.png&w=545&h=320&ei=Ow3pTu6DHMPh0QG6_oWACg&zoom=1&iact=hc&vpx=178&vpy=286&dur=15938&hovh=172&hovw=293&tx=150&ty=114&sig=1130883500537574…
/r/MensRights14/12/11 08:58 PM
9

Over 50% of all marriages now end in divorce. 66%-75% of divorces are initiated by the wife. Many of those are unilateral divorces initiated by her against an unwilling husband. So right there you know, as a man, if you get married, statistically this WILL happen to you. The man to whom this doesn't happen is a statistical minority. Ok, I'm no advocate of marriage for men, but in the interest of accuracy, let's look at these figures. Over 50% of marriages end in divorce. Firstly, that rate has b…
/r/MensRights14/12/11 07:33 PM
5

The subtle approach, bit at a time approach... interesting. I've noticed that I can have an argument with someone who will not back down no matter how many good points I make. But six months later, that person will have forgotten the argument but have adopted the perspective I was trying to put forward. Planting seeds.
/r/MensRights13/12/11 06:42 PM
3

Well, male readers, before you start cowering behind the sofa fearful of the castrating gender studies professor who's about to get you Out comes the shaming language, once again. It's really all they've got, isn't it.
/r/MensRights13/12/11 06:18 PM
7

I'd figure the police would be in a position to have some appreciation for men's rights, actually. As a largely male organization, they must have their share of divorcés who have been screwed over in the family courts, for example.
/r/MensRights09/12/11 04:32 PM
6

Strike a man in the gonads and you get a laugh track.
/r/MensRights09/12/11 02:47 AM
5

So, in effect, you're advocating the restoration of the "at-fault" divorce. Apparently it's only possible to be "at-fault" if you're a man, though.
/r/MensRights07/12/11 03:42 PM
1

No, it isn't. There are plenty of specific issues in which men clearly get the short end of the stick in society. Any society truly interested in equality would address them.
/r/MensRights07/12/11 03:59 AM
1

Sure, it decreases domestic violence. Because a lot career women either get married later or not at all.
/r/MensRights06/12/11 03:42 AM
2

I suggest moving to a different department, or at least a different floor, if you can. Anything to put you out of contact with this woman. It's all in her head; anything you do from here could be viewed negatively. Say "hello" and you're badgering her. Don't say "hello" and you're creating a hostile work environment. Look at her and you're leering. Don't look and you're being cold. Etc. You have no control except to absence yourself from her. On top of that, why not take the initiative and look …
/r/MensRights04/12/11 10:22 PM
35

I think you have to start with a particular assumption: "A woman is never wrong". Then go from there.
/r/MensRights01/12/11 10:11 PM
1

Sounds like it was written by a fifteen year old.
/r/MensRights01/12/11 09:59 PM
3

No, only financial rape.
/r/MensRights30/11/11 03:35 PM
1

That's like saying I hate all cars because I pointed out a certain model has faulty brakes.
/r/MensRights29/11/11 06:13 PM
3

Sex is easily used as a weapon.
/r/MensRights29/11/11 12:59 PM
3

Didn't someone once say you can accomplish a marriage directly by finding a woman you don't like and giving her a house?
/r/MensRights26/11/11 08:57 PM
5

I think the solution is to create a female-only nation and invite all of the radical feminists, all of the women that live in terror and hatred of men, to just go live there and ease their troubled minds.
/r/MensRights26/11/11 12:09 AM
30

Should just organize a boycott of the pubs there. Put them all out of business, being full of women waiting for someone else to buy them drinks and no one else.
/r/MensRights25/11/11 12:42 AM
2

I think they'll just keep going after any sector where men have an apparent edge.
/r/MensRights23/11/11 10:47 PM
8

You know, I've always wondered.. why do these brutal bastards live? You'd figure that at some point, someone with a deep grudge who gets let out of prison would hunt them down and pay them back?
/r/MensRights22/11/11 11:15 PM
15

Speaking of physical arousal, some women achieve orgasm while being raped. I suppose by this logic, they can't have been raped either?
/r/MensRights22/11/11 05:00 AM
4

They believe in equal rights, do they? Point out the inequalities in reproductive rights that work against men? Point out the inequalities in the family courts that work against men? Point out the inequalities in the school systems that work against boys? The standard reply: you just hate all women, you misogynist. That's how interested in equality they really are.
/r/MensRights18/11/11 02:36 AM
2

most of you would want nothing to do with your own children Dream on.
/r/MensRights17/11/11 06:50 AM
1

You'll be about as welcome as a evolutionary biologist in a bible class. Good turn of words.
/r/MensRights16/11/11 04:21 PM
2

Not for me. If she tries to attack my self esteem, it just kills my interest in her. A warm, supportive woman is much more attractive.
/r/MensRights15/11/11 04:38 PM
7

I don't think you have to bring Satan into it; some people are just idiots.
/r/MensRights09/11/11 05:36 PM
1

Instead of insulting the other poster, go try to learn something if you're unable to discern how widespread hypergamy creates social unrest. And this time, keep your mouth closed and your eyes open.
/r/MensRights07/11/11 03:59 AM
10

"Feminazi" comes to mind.
/r/MensRights06/11/11 10:16 PM
6

Not even that, with cases of sperm-theft leading to child support obligations.
/r/MensRights05/11/11 06:22 PM
13

Dodged a bullet there. After she had her kid, she'd have left anyway and you'd be on the hook supporting a child you'd almost never get to see.
/r/MensRights05/11/11 06:21 PM
16

Let's turn this around: "Because she wouldn't give me what I wanted, I decided to take it from her. I resolved to have sex with her in the middle of the night. I thought it was my right, given that she was living with me and I had bought her many, many groceries". Any feminist would flip out over such a statement. The sad thing is that they're probably perfectly ok with a woman behaving this way.
/r/MensRights05/11/11 06:19 PM
4

I think you're right. It's just an opportunist milking the system that feminism created.
/r/MensRights02/11/11 07:57 PM
2

Men don't have to carry a baby for nine months and shouldn't be able to control women's bodies. Always the same line. Men shouldn't be able to control women's bodies, women get all the choices, women should be able to control men's wallets. So totally one-sided it makes me want to puke.
/r/MensRights02/11/11 07:52 PM
3

So... paternity test?
/r/MensRights02/11/11 07:50 PM
5

They say you don't appreciate what you have until it's gone. We really need to set up a "female nation". Let all the man-haters and rape-hysteria floggers go there to build their perfect society. Let's see how far they get.
/r/MensRights01/11/11 11:35 PM
78

More idiots trying to turn life into a bland pap of inoffensiveness and safety in which one can barely even manage to wake up as one passes through the day. I have a hypothesis that there's a subset of the human race that just can't help but try to meddle in other peoples' affairs. It's what gets them off. It makes them feel morally superior. This used to be confined to small communities and their hen-peck orders, and to lay people of religions, but now that society is so mobile and anonymous in…
/r/MensRights31/10/11 04:48 PM
3

My impression is what he was saying there is that women would prefer to hire housekeepers and nannies than to do the housework themselves when the financial means exist. Not that women universally get married to avoid those tasks.
/r/MensRights31/10/11 04:48 AM
3

A pre-nup won't help you in the family court, did you know? They are regularly thrown out. Not that I accept this argument to begin with.
/r/MensRights31/10/11 04:45 AM
7

Where did he say that? In fact, all he asked you was how to distinguish between gold diggers and sincere women, and pointed out that the legal system does not care to make a distinction; the woman gets the financial prize regardless of how she behaved.
/r/MensRights31/10/11 04:42 AM
4

I'd say that golddigging can often be tantamount to fraud, and should not be blamed on the man who was suckered in.
/r/MensRights31/10/11 04:40 AM
0

Feminist "reasoning" again: take a specific point and extrapolate it into "you just hate all women".
/r/MensRights31/10/11 04:07 AM
2

"If you choose the wrong one, it's not all her fault." How one-sided. Have you stopped to consider that she chose him too? In fact, maybe even pursued him with the intention of capturing his wealth? In the most blatant cases, even changing personality the day after the wedding, because at that point she legally "had it made"?
/r/MensRights31/10/11 04:05 AM
11

Enough are to make getting married dangerous to a man's entire subsequent well being.
/r/MensRights31/10/11 04:00 AM
5

Well, maybe the law is a bit harsh, but it was meant to prevent the cynical gouging that's been going on in which a woman marries up and two years later walks with the house. It's been happening too much. Maybe shared ownership should be phased in over time. If she sticks with him long enough to actually raise the family, she gets her full half.
/r/MensRights30/10/11 09:50 PM
17

Modern feminism: denying real-life trends with accusations of misogyny.
/r/MensRights30/10/11 09:33 PM
11

Keep in mind that it's not your fault that she is selfish and irresponsible. It may not feel like it, but it's for the best that you're rid of her. Go see a lawyer as soon as possible and get his advice on those steps to take to best retain access to your two children and to avoid being steamrolled in court. As for the accusation of abuse, it's become very common these days. The laws are stilted to favor women. You'll need to act carefully to avoid pitfalls she may try to create for you (on the …
/r/MensRights29/10/11 05:48 PM
2

That's what these posters are about: verbal abuse. A very broad definition of verbal abuse. A definition that is so broad, I expect over 50% of women could be found to be verbal abusers if it was applied fairly.
/r/MensRights24/10/11 12:44 AM
7

You should have gone to a lawyer, not to the police. Obtained counsel on how to prepare an airtight case.
/r/MensRights24/10/11 12:38 AM
24

Make some similar posters for men. Does she never stop finding fault with you? Does she use sex as a weapon to get what she wants? Does she make your life miserable over trivial things? Does she insult you in front of your kids? Don't you make enough money? Image of a guy at a table, clock showing it's late a night, with papers in front of him and his head in his hands. Post them and harvest the hypocrisy of their reactions.
/r/MensRights23/10/11 06:38 PM
1

You know, we see a constant scroll of news items here pointing out women that are guilty of sexual abuse. Someone should keep adding them into a list and then just post it right in the face of one of these feminists. Then say "women commit sexual abuse" and "I don't wan't to see a woman with a boy" and watch them flip out. Then point out the hypocrisy. "I don't care if 0.1% or 0.000001% of women are sexual abusers. Women commit sexual abuse! Therefore women are all evil and shouldn't be allowed …
/r/MensRights20/10/11 11:28 PM
19

Hey, troll, you do realize that nearly all men go through life without killing anyone, right?
/r/MensRights20/10/11 08:24 AM
4

required to gain access to the woman Once upon a time, but not these days. How many couples "wait" until marriage anymore? Sex is more readily available to men than ever before.
/r/MensRights18/10/11 02:24 PM
4

How did this happen? Here are a few ideas. A large-scale turning away from the Church and its moral strictures. Loss of stigma of divorce. The introduction of no-fault divorce laws. The movement of the rural population (where there was actual community and social pressure) to the large cities (where one hardly knows one's neighbours and has social anonymity). The increasing financial independence of woman as they entered the workpace.
/r/MensRights18/10/11 02:19 PM
5

Yeah, a man actually has to prove his accusations in court.
/r/MensRights18/10/11 12:27 PM
-1

We have a Code Purple here. http://exposingfeminism.wordpress.com/shaming-tactics/ Use this list to expurgate feminist "arguments" and there's typically very little content left on their behalf.
/r/MensRights17/10/11 02:49 AM
6

Yeah, and yet when a celebrity like Britney Spears or Avril Lavigne divorces her husband, what does the ex-husband get? Pretty much squat, relatively. As for child support, it's ridiculous the way the precious kiddies are deemed too delicate to be able to survive on less than $10,000 a month. You just know that money isn't going to be spent by Cupcake on Junior, either. He pays, she has no accountability. It's the core of modern feminism. This system is totally biased.
/r/MensRights16/10/11 05:39 PM
2

Well, of course there are, such as boredom or dissatisfaction with their lives. The problem is that when the going gets a little tough (flames of passion have been replaced with two or three demanding young kids), there's a substantial chance the woman will blame her husband and bail rather than rising to the challenge. Men are becoming increasingly aware of this. I think one of the lines in the little dialogue is telling, even if it's been made up. "I do feel like he promised me happiness". Pur…
/r/MensRights16/10/11 05:27 PM
3

Thus the mens rights movement. In the mean time, why should men stick their heads into a legal noose?
/r/MensRights16/10/11 05:16 AM
1

Are you implying that the majority of divorces are initiated because the man in the relationship is abusive? I remember reading somewhere that actual physical abuse accounts for about 4% of divorce cases. Although lately feminists have been trying to broaden the definition of abuse to the point where even looking crossed-eyed at a wife would count.
/r/MensRights16/10/11 05:13 AM
1

The problem is that the consequences of marrying a woman that decides on this path are a lot greater than watching a lousy movie and regretting it. Would you walk into a minefield because "not all patches of ground there are like that"?
/r/MensRights16/10/11 05:07 AM
10

No kidding. You always hear about some rich guy having to cough up an enormous settlement upon divorce. But what did Avril Lavigne, who makes $60 million a year, have to give up when she divorced her husband, for example? Nothing at all.
/r/MensRights15/10/11 12:46 AM
1

It won't matter. The notion of race will be dead anyhow in 50 to 100 years, I predict. Genetic manipulation and selection of traits will replace the random mixing of genes through mating.
/r/MensRights15/10/11 12:43 AM
3

Except that women are really the choosers when it comes to mating. Especially with the pill and abortions on demand.
/r/MensRights14/10/11 12:25 AM
4

More than just encourage it, they perpetuate it by having the children of such men.
/r/MensRights14/10/11 12:24 AM
5

I'd say it's pretty clear that improving the lot of boys in school and fighting against the anti-male family courts would benefit all men. As for trying to get rid of the blatant misandry in the media, it really is a white male issue; the media don't portray men of other races as ineffective bozos who are only kept afloat by their oh-so-superior wives.
/r/MensRights13/10/11 06:25 PM
19

No indication on how they worded the questions, which is always a huge factor in the results obtained. No mention of hypergamy: "sure, I'd like to have children; but I'm only looking for commitment from the apex men".
/r/MensRights12/10/11 06:12 PM
3

Here's this argument again. Let's not fight against injustice social trends because some of the class of people perpetrating them are passive instead of actively promoting them. Let's just say "not all women are feminists" and let it all roll on.
/r/MensRights08/10/11 09:58 PM
5

Apparently marriage is becoming a license for a woman to kill a man.
/r/MensRights07/10/11 02:43 AM
5

I guess the cop made his quota that month.
/r/MensRights05/10/11 06:37 PM
2

I doubt you'd find it so great if she stops respecting you and starts to treat you like a servant.
/r/MensRights03/10/11 06:04 PM
9

Young women are finally gaining the recognition in their pay packets that their higher qualifications merit But of course if it's men earning more, it must be a pay gap and can't possibly have anything to do with such things as qualifications and career choices. Ms Curnock Cook, who was delivering the Elizabeth Johnson memorial lecture at the Institute of Physics, stressed: "I wouldn't want anyone to think I've come and solved the gender gap in pay rates." Yeah, she won't be happy until women ea…
/r/MensRights03/10/11 05:57 PM
2

It isn't true. Only the wacko fringe would say otherwise.
/r/MensRights03/10/11 06:06 AM
3

A very rewarding exercise would be to actually set up a female-only nation some where. Let all of this ilk go there and try to run themselves. If they're happy, great. At least they're not poisoning our society with their man-hate anymore. Let the most nasty and bitter of them go there. If they implode out of the sudden lack of men to blame everything on, it will be a useful example to everyone.
/r/MensRights01/10/11 09:14 PM
1

I intend to interpret this as meaning women only use computers when they have to, whereas men also use them as a source of entertainment. Not inherently insulting.
/r/MensRights01/10/11 09:04 PM
11

"Women whose husbands support them represent a small fraction of American women." O RLY?
/r/MensRights28/09/11 04:58 AM
2

Educationally, women are doing better than they ever have. Doctors, lawyers, graduate degrees... they've been dominating the universities for some years now. So, they've certainly been motivated work hard and to try to achieve. I don't see a need to try to change the part of the system that seems to work.
/r/MensRights27/09/11 11:08 PM
2

It sounds like you want a Hogwarts-style sorting hat. Maybe so; divide the kids into more than two categories according to their dispositions.
/r/MensRights27/09/11 07:48 PM
2

They are already, in the public schools, and they seem to thrive on it. Very few male teachers to be found there these days.
/r/MensRights27/09/11 07:44 PM
3

Because she doesn't respect her husband if she can push him around?
/r/MensRights27/09/11 02:33 PM
2

Through restoring the male teacher to positions in primary schools. The girls can all be perfectly safe with their female teachers (which seems to be what society wants), while the boys could have some male role models to follow. Instead of women in charge at school (no male teachers due to the pedophile hysteria), and women in charge at home (fathers kicked out by divorce), and women in charge everywhere else they see within their limited horizons. I realize that there is such a thing as a pedo…
/r/MensRights27/09/11 06:55 AM
2

It's a circular argument. Don't try it because there's no evidence. Then: there's no evidence this will be helpful. Meanwhile, boys get discouraged and drop out in droves. I'd say it would be possible to apply some reason here, and develop a program that targets boys based on specific observations. It could make a huge difference just to have more male teachers (who have largely been driven out of primary education by the pedophile hysteria) too. It's hard to see how having more male teachers co…
/r/MensRights27/09/11 06:44 AM
2

"Last week’s news out of Madison, WI, indicates that state education officials share this concern. They have put a hold on a proposed sex-segregated school, Madison Prep, asking the school’s proponents to provide scientifically based evidence showing that separating boys and girls will get educational results." Laughable.. they put the segregated school on hold until there is evidence that it shows positive benefit. Where is the evidence to come from if no experiments are attempted? Also, given …
/r/MensRights27/09/11 04:53 AM
2

I suspect they fear losing their entrenched position for early indoctrination of boys in the present school system.
/r/MensRights27/09/11 04:52 AM
7

So, what is it that they're trying to do here? Get every company to post rainbows and what-not? Since obviously they wouldn't accept "sexist" office trappings, and now are saying that purely business-like trappings are a hostile working environment to women, that effectively only leaves requiring pictures of Gloria Steinem on every wall and everyone chanting an alliegance to feminism and LGBT rights at the start of each office day?
/r/MensRights25/09/11 11:03 PM
4

I guess the networks just have stopped caring about attracting male viewership. Unappealing programs + insulting programs + endless spates of ads = TV stays off and internet gets browsed.
/r/MensRights22/09/11 05:04 PM
1

http://www.in-gender.com/XYU/Gender-Preference/#SexSelection +TIL sex selection can somehow be accomplished without abortion.
/r/MensRights20/09/11 11:02 PM
3

Apparently, it's the other way around in the U.S. Boys are more often selectively aborted. But it's not common in North America (yet). A lot of doctors won't do it. EDIT: sex selection by abortion is rare in the U.S. However, there are kits available to separate sperm in an attempt to improve the odds of conceiving a girl or boy.
/r/MensRights20/09/11 07:11 PM
4

There's some hope it won't be a life sentence: http://www.voanews.com/english/news/health/Drug-Compound-Wipes-Out-Multiple-Viral-Infections-127974633.html
/r/MensRights19/09/11 02:45 PM
1

http://www.examiner.com/workplace-issues-in-arlington/time-to-eradicate-sports-talk-from-business-communications
/r/MensRights19/09/11 02:21 PM
1

In the rush to appoint women for political purposes, it's possible that some of the appointees weren't ready for the job and simply don't offer the shrewdest of options when called upon.
/r/MensRights18/09/11 03:59 PM
4

Can't get laid, or don't even try to get laid?
/r/MensRights17/09/11 06:17 PM
-3

Well, under the law, there are specific consequences for sexual harrassment. Sexual jokes + woman taking offense = potential sexual harrassment complaint = loss of job and future employment prospects if she decides to go ahead with it. Otherwise she can take legal action against her employer. Since people can potentially take offense to just about anything these days, it's best to be extremely bland in the workplace, especially around women. Unless you don't need to work, that is. It's just hard…
/r/MensRights16/09/11 04:43 PM
-2

I wouldn't say it means she's kind, just not vindictive. But, yes, the way the law is structured now, it's best to behave like an emotionless robot while at work.
/r/MensRights16/09/11 02:32 PM
0

Not dominating? Being stamped on and rubbished is more like it. I pity these children and the confusion they're going to feel. As for "one small part of the world", that's how it begins, isn't it. You can be certain that, given any result short of the whole batch lighting themselves on fire and throwing themselves screaming off a cliff, this will be proclaimed a "success" by those invested in it. At which point they'll start pushing it into the school system for wider acceptance. No. Thanks.
/r/MensRights14/09/11 03:46 AM
3

Or a man with pockets turned out and a woman walking away with bags of money.
/r/MensRights14/09/11 02:34 AM
1

Some things are worth being upset about. Like the damage that can be done to peoples' lives by these arrogant fools who think they know better than everyone else. "Let me show you our school library. This book is about two male gay giraffes who are sad because they cannot have a child. It has a happy ending. They adopt a lonely crocodile egg. The school has lots of books that revolve around gay, lesbian, bisexual and trans-sexual people. And single mothers. Happy families don’t feature to any de…
/r/MensRights14/09/11 12:53 AM
1

I can just see one gender becoming "popular", most likely female due to the absence of male role models, and all the kids locking into that out of social pressure. And it becomes harder as time passes to break the mold, due to the backlash when a kid "converts". Pah. Let's face it, the real agenda here is to destroy maleness. I wish these people would stop messing with society.
/r/MensRights13/09/11 03:40 PM
2

Barbara McClintock. There are some, but progress and enterprise has vastly been the domain of men. That was AFM's point. Of course it can be argued that, until recently, women didn't have a proper chance. We'll see over the next several decades.
/r/MensRights06/09/11 09:46 PM
1

First, you should distinguish between "smarter" and "wiser". Female behavior may seem wiser than male behavior in general, since they are less apt to take risks. However, without risktakers, we might never have left the caves. It's a complementary situation. Concerning schools, the performance of boys is worse than it was before the whole issue arose in the '90s. This isn't just a product of girls being encouraged. The boys are demotivated. If you want to read a book that looks at this thoroughl…
/r/MensRights06/09/11 06:54 PM
3

Pitiful. The times they've a-changed.
/r/MensRights04/09/11 06:01 PM
6

Good grief. When I was 11, I'd roam about on my bike with the simple warning "be back in time for dinner". I didn't need constant supervision, nor did the other kids in my neighborhood.
/r/MensRights04/09/11 08:54 AM
2

Then the ex-husband should assume ownership of the house, even if she lives in it.
/r/MensRights02/09/11 10:02 AM
1

I wouldn't be surprised if she finds herself mysteriously being granted fewer interviews now. Who wants to work with a prickly pear?
/r/MensRights01/09/11 10:28 PM
1

No kidding. This is just madness.
/r/MensRights01/09/11 09:47 AM
2

No one's paying any attention to you, solo or not, while the movie runs anyhow. I don't see a problem. Well, except a few derpinas, but who cares. Just go after the movie's been playing a few weeks, so you don't have to sit near to anyone.
/r/MensRights29/08/11 10:52 PM
4

How is it different than watching a movie at home, except that the picture is a lot better? Why do you need to have someone to sit with silently while you're both busy watching the movie?
/r/MensRights29/08/11 10:42 PM
4

In my opinion, the attitude of "f*** gratitude" in this case is equivalent to saying her need gives her the absolute right to benefit from my labor. Obviously life these days is more complex, but in principle it's no different than saying that she gets to take the corn I labored to grow, simply because she's hungry. I wouldn't resent giving up the corn, so long as my own family and I didn't go hungry from it. But I would resent giving up the corn without a thank you, even if she had arrived in h…
/r/MensRights27/08/11 03:28 AM
0

This from a class of people (i.e. feminists) to who logic and balanced reasoning are foreign concepts? All you have is this kind of invective and attempts at social shaming to try to impose your worldview.
/r/MensRights24/08/11 11:24 AM
3

The article is basically saying that young females are more geared to delayed gratification FTFY. I'd argue that they're just more likely to exhibit approval-seeking behavior, which keeps them slogging along.
/r/MensRights24/08/11 11:22 AM
3

Women would be even safer if they just stayed in their homes. Would you be in favor of laws enforcing that? No? Obviously there has to be a balance in society between freedom and safety. This sexist regulation goes too far.
/r/MensRights22/08/11 03:51 AM
3

Another good argument for creating some male-only colleges that students can attend to escape this bulls***.
/r/MensRights22/08/11 03:49 AM
1

"Why am I considered a pervert and disgusting for this?" You're guilty of peeking while not being attractive. Make yourself attractive and suddenly you're just flirting.
/r/MensRights21/08/11 08:03 PM
-1

That said, anyone pretentious enough to consider themselves "geniuses" are more than likely to be douchebags of the highest order The whole lot of you come across as a bunch of elitist brats Care to reduce all that highbrow claptrap Anti-intellectualism is alive and well on Reddit, it seems.
/r/MensRights20/08/11 10:40 PM
6

I once saw a Dilbert cartoon that seems apt. In it, Dilbert asks the leader of a Mensa chapter something like, "If we're all so smart, why don't we rule the world"? The Mensa leader narrowed his eyes and said "Intelligence is less useful than one might think" or so. There's no doubt that scientists, doctors and mathematicians are subject to all the same emotions and human failings everyone else is, and it shows in their behavior.
/r/MensRights20/08/11 10:37 PM
3

To me, Men's Rights is about fairness. We have a laundry list of issues in which men get the short end of the stick. Address those, and the movement will go away, satisfied.
/r/MensRights20/08/11 01:23 AM
3

I think he meant he'd give her something real to accuse him of, and to heck with the consequences.
/r/MensRights19/08/11 01:52 AM
37

""We are sick of hooking up with guys," writes the comedian Julie Klausner, author of a touchingly funny 2010 book, "I Don't Care About Your Band: What I Learned from Indie Rockers, Trust Funders, Pornographers, Felons, Faux-Sensitive Hipsters and Other Guys I've Dated."" Great. So, the gist of this is, while you girls go and give the best years of your lives to bad boys and rich players, the rest of us guys are supposed to work our monk-like asses off to build up money and a career so that, whe…
/r/MensRights17/08/11 10:43 PM
5

Uh, what? How do you go from this article to your headline?
/r/MensRights16/08/11 10:52 PM
5

This from the woman who has benefited throughout most of her adult life from John Lennon's accomplishments and estate. Bah. You know, we should really do this. Declare the Isle of Lesbos or some place to be female-only. Watch the lesbians and the hard-core feminists flock there, and see what sort of society they build. I predict they'd be clawing each other's eyes out within a year. And still blaming it all on men.
/r/MensRights16/08/11 05:41 AM
6

I fear women in the workplace. They're so easy to offend. They won't tell you either, but they'll start backstabbing campaigns. You can always tell when it's happened because suddenly the whole group of them won't talk to you or look you in the eye. You never know what half-truths or lies reach peoples' ears (including management) and there's no way to defend yourself because no one owes up to it. It's important because surviving in the workplace isn't just a matter of doing the work you've been…
/r/MensRights12/08/11 10:34 PM
3

Obviously something to do with markets and demand.
/r/MensRights11/08/11 07:32 PM
2

Absolutely.
/r/MensRights10/08/11 12:03 AM
2

If any man, after reading r/mr for a while, gets afraid of working as a teacher, for instance, that would be a very bad thing. Better that a man enter a career understanding the dangers and be able to take some measures to protect himself from them, than to go in blindly and have his life casually destroyed by little Cupcake who doesn't like her mark for her essay.
/r/MensRights09/08/11 07:43 PM
1

Don't continue to date a man with whom you have zero chemistry. Chemistry matters. I suspect this is equivalent to saying, "don't date a man who doesn't make your hormones dance". Or, more simply, "date only dominant, alpha men". The problem is that's only 10-20% of the male half of the species.
/r/MensRights08/08/11 05:57 AM
6

Only 47 per cent of women are saving enough for retirement, compared with 59 per cent of men This is only a statement concerning relative rates of saving, not a reason of any sort. Women need to save a much bigger pension pot than men to get the equivalent annual incomes because they live a lot longer, and annuity rates currently pay men more than women. This is an incentive to save more then, not a reason for saving less. From the article: Many of us find money issues boring. Financial literatu…
/r/MensRights08/08/11 04:00 AM
4

All you have to do is look at Michelle Bachmann to see that the answer is "yes".
/r/MensRights06/08/11 07:48 PM
1

Upvoted to help improve awareness of this blog.
/r/MensRights05/08/11 10:58 PM
0

Think about this, women: without men, you only have other women to support your children. No men supporting the family directly (even if only through child support and alimony). No men supporting civilization (and your welfare cheques and other benefits) through work and taxation. Still sound like a good deal? Maybe we should be asking: do men need women?
/r/MensRights05/08/11 01:30 AM
2

Instruction manual for milking the privileges feminism has ushered in for them.
/r/MensRights27/07/11 05:07 AM
8

If women are such wondrous business people, where are all the new companies they must be able to start at will? Since they're so great, their new companies would have to succeed like mad, right? Why is this only about parachuting women into companies men have already built? First they restructured the school system to favor themselves. Now they want to do the same in the corporate world. It's all about advantage.
/r/MensRights25/07/11 07:57 AM
4

Seems like r/againstmensrights is redundant to me. Just have to go to r/feminism for that.
/r/MensRights23/07/11 05:55 PM
10

Not if she has demonstrated herself to be a MRA first. Do you have any candidates like that who are applying?
/r/MensRights22/07/11 07:44 PM
2

Lol... that first article is actually pretty funny.
/r/MensRights20/07/11 11:39 PM
4

It can easily be classified as a hate crime in Canada.
/r/MensRights19/07/11 04:51 AM
1

Yeah, I could compare my ass to your face... durrhurrhurr. Seriously, though, she is attacking MRAs for being close-minded. Pot, meet a whole stack of kettles?
/r/MensRights15/07/11 12:23 AM
1

You're living in the past. Look around at what "feminism" has become. As for trying to change things, what do you figure forums like this one are about? (1) Making people aware of the problems. (2) Gathering numbers needed to influence the system.
/r/MensRights14/07/11 10:39 PM
0

She posted in /r/mensrights = male /r/feminism. Not in OneY = male TwoX. And she bitches about MRAs = again, /r/mensrights.
/r/MensRights14/07/11 07:51 PM
4

May I point out that if this was /r/feminism and you attacked feminism in the same way, you'd have been censored and banned by now. Big difference right there.
/r/MensRights14/07/11 07:16 PM
2

At the very least, the notion of fault in a divorce should be reintroduced to some extent. If she's kicking him out, less alimony. Stomp out the financial incentive for divorce.
/r/MensRights13/07/11 01:47 AM
9

If it's absurd, it's only because the laws are absurd.
/r/MensRights11/07/11 04:21 PM
2

In fact, it might be a good idea to have a lawyer present at many of the stages.
/r/MensRights11/07/11 04:19 PM
1

"When my dad left in the spring of 1981 and moved five states away with his executive assistant and her four kids, the world as I had known it came to an end. In my 12-year-old eyes, my mother, formerly a regal, erudite figure, was transformed into a phantom in a sweaty nightgown and matted hair, howling on the floor of our gray-carpeted playroom." Of course, naturally, the husband has to be the villain of her anecdote. Even though the majority of divorces are initiated by the wife.
/r/MensRights10/07/11 11:16 PM
2

If they really carry forward with these kinds of things.. i.e. not prosecuting false allegations and letting women off lightly for crimes like murder.. I think there's no choice but to separate off into male-only zones, leaving the women with no one to accuse but each other. It's the last line of defense.
/r/MensRights09/07/11 06:26 PM
1

Actually, some women in China find themselves in this position. Too alpha to find a "suitable" husband. Or so I've read. Apparently the top women and bottom men in Chinese society have the lowest rate of marriage.
/r/MensRights08/07/11 03:30 AM
3

So women who are infertile or openly chose not to have babies are disposable? Women who are beyond their reproductive years are disposable? Women who have abortions are moving themselves toward being disposable? Society doesn't treat them that way.
/r/MensRights07/07/11 07:53 PM
18

"what makes this all ironic is I did get an eyeful this weekend of how serious the problem of sexism in the atheist/skeptical movement really is" I.e. among people most inclined to reason. What a surprise; modern feminism has always had problems with reason and logic.
/r/MensRights07/07/11 04:04 PM
14

You mean, you offer to pay the pizza delivery girl "some other way" and suddenly suggestive music starts to play?
/r/MensRights07/07/11 03:58 PM
2

We may be approaching a society in which men just pay a lump sum to women to have and raise their kids, with contractual rights to see their kids for a specified part of the time. Like post-divorce, except a lot less messy and with fewer lawyers to pay.
/r/MensRights06/07/11 01:07 AM
6

Yeah, let's not do anything, anytime, because some women somewhere might be afraid. That's what it amounts to. Men can't read minds and if we try to avoid all possible scenarios where a woman gets afraid, we'd never be able to leave home, much less get a date.
/r/MensRights05/07/11 07:58 PM
15

The tyranny of the female state-of-mind.
/r/MensRights05/07/11 07:57 PM
0

In other words, they just respond to their feelings and rationalize it afterwards? And they need physical proximity to their mates to stir their feelings? This isn't news.
/r/MensRights04/07/11 11:30 PM
6

The political assassination of Mr. Strauss-Kahn is now complete, even if he is vindicated against all charges.
/r/MensRights04/07/11 06:25 PM
2

"Isn't "men have to be men" one of the main issues MR is trying to fight?" I've seen some MRAs take exception to being told to "man up" and such, yes. Mostly when they perceive it as being a form of manipulation to cause them to behave in ways that benefit women. E.g. "man up" about marriage instead of protest against the inequalities of the institution. "A note: typical boy and girl behaviour is a construct." Typical boy and girl behaviour is not just a social construct. Look here, for example:…
/r/MensRights04/07/11 06:25 AM
3

No, it's not an attack on femininity, because femininity is basically done with. Women aren't "feminine" any more, except in that they use cosmetics and pay more attention to clothes than men do. Feminine mannerisms are gone. But they are female. But some aspects of femininity are enforced more than ever in classrooms today and on society as a whole. Passivity. Obedience. Cooperation rather than competition. Wow, it's like there's an agenda to destroy maleness. Kick boys out of school or smack t…
/r/MensRights03/07/11 08:05 PM
7

Sounds to me like you're watching women, not tennis.
/r/MensRights03/07/11 05:50 PM
7

I see this as another attempt to stomp out masculinity, by not allowing boys to form a concept of what it is. "Nearly all the children's books deal with homosexual couples, single parents or adopted children." How can this not be viewed as a blatant attack on the society's core social unit, namely mom+dad+children? It's trying to establish everything except the norm as being the norm.
/r/MensRights03/07/11 05:32 PM
2

So, tell me, do you think the natural outcome of such an environment will be more bisexuals and homosexuals? Given that girls tend to develop more quickly than boys and might tend to dominate, do you think it's a fair environment for boys to try to decide who they are? Do you think it's a good idea to let them make such an important life decision at such a young age, when some simple momentary fancy could set them down one role or the other for years, during which it would become increasingly di…
/r/MensRights03/07/11 05:15 PM
1

"i pity the sad, bitter man who wrote it" Uhuh. Because there's nothing to be bitter about after discovering one has been paying to raise someone else's kid(s) for 20 years. And nothing to be sad about when one realizes it's too late to have a kid of one's own now. /sarcasm
/r/MensRights02/07/11 06:47 PM
2

Actually, it's not that bad, so long as you don't get married and so long as you stay away from women in the workplace.
/r/MensRights02/07/11 12:07 AM
3

Not most women, it would seem. Have you noticed any females protesting against this?
/r/MensRights01/07/11 05:17 AM
11

Why earn what you can have legislated to just be given to you?
/r/MensRights01/07/11 04:22 AM
3

If we're all going to die out, we're taking our sperm banks with us.
/r/MensRights30/06/11 10:46 PM
-1

Sweden is a self-solving problem. Their self-destructive social engineering will go the way of the Dodo when the Muslim colonists gather and breed enough population there to overrun them. In pretty much the same way as the Dodo went, too: foolish and defenseless. The danger is that they will spread these crippling "ideas" to the rest of the world first.
/r/MensRights30/06/11 12:32 AM
5

We're not allowed to be men in modern society. Act like a man and you go to jail or die fighting it. Our instincts are out of kilter with today's world, and so are women's.
/r/MensRights28/06/11 07:03 PM
5

"We force more women to be homeless so it's equal?" How about we divert some money from women's programs (like Women's Studies departments) into addressing male homelessness? Oh? Not going to happen, you say? In any case, it's a big ledger, and everything on both sides of the column (such as male homelessness) should be weighed before women start deciding they are oppressed and underprivileged and deserve programs and spending to springboard them into this and that. Feminism has a convenient hab…
/r/MensRights27/06/11 10:34 PM
0

"Almost all public spaces still accord the same number of square metres to male and female toilets, and because women can't use urinals, they end up with half as many toilets in the allocated space." How's that for logic? Same area, yet half as many toilets? So (n) urinals = 0 toilets in terms of space? Some of it isn't too unreasonable, though. If they want stations to change babies at, I don't see a problem. Better than on a park bench or (worse) a picnic table!
/r/MensRights18/06/11 12:09 PM
3

Some actual respect.
/r/MensRights17/06/11 11:51 AM
1

Another sign of the burgeoning campaign to make it illegal to look at women. Let's just set up "women-free" zones, move there, and be done with it.
/r/MensRights14/06/11 11:33 PM
0

What a bunch of crap. Most women couldn't even tell you the difference between a preferred and common share. He takes a handful of men and tries to make it into a broad negative. He takes an even smaller handful of women and tries to make it a broad positive. Someone should kick him in the 'nads, except he probably handed them over to some woman a long time ago.
/r/MensRights14/06/11 08:29 PM
6

Funny then, wouldn't they get a lot more hits and attention if they bashed women?
/r/MensRights14/06/11 08:27 PM
1

"Bumping uglies" takes more than one ugly.
/r/MensRights11/06/11 07:16 AM
1

Or, more accurately, leave us alone until the bad boys no longer pay us attention and you've built up enough of a career, income and nest egg to be worth screwing over in divorce court.
/r/MensRights10/06/11 08:57 PM
3

No, you're not wasting people's time. Get it checked out.
/r/MensRights10/06/11 04:01 PM
5

"EDIT: Thank you for the empathy! However, aren't there any divorced dads here who can actually speak about what their actual experience was? I need some baselines to compare against. Am I the typical divorced dad? Am I doing worse or better? How do you cope? Can you name services that help?" There are whole websites devoted to divorced dads. Typing "divorced dads website" into Google will produce a list. Here is a sample link, directly to the website's finances forum: http://www.dadsdivorce.com…
/r/MensRights29/05/11 04:36 AM
1

Still, it makes some sense in this context. Men pursue status. A woman only needs to announce herself as female in these games and she gets showered in gifts. In any case, she's probably not nearly as concerned about becoming the ultimate badass.
/r/MensRights28/05/11 11:58 PM
3

Thin edge of the wedge? Maybe in ten years, we'll all be wearing masks to protect women from the discomfort of sharing the same universe?
/r/MensRights25/05/11 04:46 AM
1

True. Still funny.
/r/MensRights24/05/11 04:19 AM
5

"Why not castrate all men once they reach a certain age? Given how horrible it is to be a victim of rape, men should be able to deal with this minor inconvenience." At least one radical feminist has suggested just that. They've elevating rape to be as broad as life and as consequential as the end of the universe. It's all about seizing power for themselves.
/r/MensRights22/05/11 05:18 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter