TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Content_Concert_2555 Archive

View 0 posts and 372 comments by Content_Concert_2555 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
–

Who knew that being introduced to someone is not as off putting as approaching a stranger in public and hitting on them. Did PUA TikToks lie to me?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/26 10:06 PM
–

Anyone who complains about other people who are taking anti harassment, anti rape position, let alone making this reactionary impulse an ideology, needs to reevaluate their lives.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/26 09:30 PM
1

So what? You are your brain.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/26 06:15 AM
1

Plenty of people don’t actually want to be in their preferred erotica/porn/romance novel scenarios IRL.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/26 12:32 AM
–

Bad men can get female attention. So? You think bad women can’t get male attention?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/26 12:05 AM
5

This is truly silly. For many women, men are their Roman Empire. They can’t get through the day without wondering if men really could build aqueducts without the help of ancient aliens.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/26 02:24 PM
1

Most other subs I wouldn’t have to explain this but social standards exist, sorry But to expand, I believe US social standards on average (and applied in a gender neutral way) are reasonable when it comes to how people in a relationship are supposed to act, therefore that is the benchmark definition I use when asked the gotcha about what’s reasonable by definition, because unless a particular situation is presented to me I can’t call whether it’s a ball or a strike. And I’m responding to a defin…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/26 01:13 AM
1

What most people would find reasonable if they weren’t the ones affected and we described the circumstances to them. Define not limited
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/26 10:43 PM
2

If that’s the definition then it’s very incel-y to believe women don’t nurture in relationships. Unless not limiting means unreasonably unlimited.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/26 06:16 PM
8

Define nurture and take care of.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/26 01:02 PM
3

How do you know they’re scared?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/26 01:05 AM
9

Why would you be in a social situation with these guys 10 years younger than you to be seeing them flirt (or avoid flirting)? Has it occurred to you that they’re not exactly your peers? Also idk what to make of you describing them as being successful because I don’t know what kind of company it is, what professional success looks like to you/them at that firm, educational attainment for them, what the gender ratio is at the workplace or when you guys go out.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/26 01:03 AM
-1

“men” generally =/= bitter internet addicted dudes theorycrafting reasons why they are alone Maybe more people, men and women, are just not as interested in meeting the social expectations of being married with 2.5 kids and that’s fine.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/26 12:59 AM
2

I don’t need them to. But if a relationship is what you’re going for you’d actually be much more likely to get set up with their friends if you had platonic female friends. But hey maybe you’ll get dates through the He-Man Women Haters Club.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/26 04:27 AM
2

Being liked by women is awesome, sorry if you’ve never experienced it. Don’t be weird.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/26 04:22 AM
0

If you have a few close female friends you’re fine. It’s not really the same as the guys I’m talking about.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/26 04:19 AM
1

If only you knew
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/26 12:08 AM
0

If you’re not friendly with both genders because of the redpill/“traditional masculinity” it’s proof it’s limiting your life.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/26 12:08 AM
0

A lot of young men in particular are either gross manosphere Stans or simply don’t know how to relate to women.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/26 08:53 PM
0

Yeah why would I want to be friends with the gender who is (on average) more mature, responsible, and emotionally supportive.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/26 08:52 PM
1

I’m pretty sure demands and bad personalities are considered disappointments…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/26 03:49 AM
2

It’s within women’s boundaries to find him creepy
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/26 08:45 PM
3

Bullshit. If she likes him they’ll def be having sex sooner or later without a second date ultimatum. He’s just impatient because his priority is smashing.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/26 06:56 PM
1

My opinion? You’re right it is. It’s impossible to read anyone’s mind. If he meant to come across another way, though, he should have communicated another way.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/26 02:09 PM
3

If you don’t know how to read between the lines (a common problem on PPD) I can’t help you other than to tell you why it comes off gross.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/26 02:00 PM
3

He is implying a romantic relationship is really on the table if she fucks him when from context it appears he just wants sex and doesn’t care about anything deeper than a situationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/26 01:54 PM
4

I think I made that clear. He’s dressing up his interest in smashing as exploring romantic compatibility. It’s the same way as any used car salesman dresses up his interest in getting your money at sticker price as a great deal for you. If it’s that great a deal you don’t need to dress it up.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/26 01:48 PM
3

It’s weaselly and manipulative though. He’s dressing up his interest in smashing as exploring compatibility. In a sense I agree it’s still good he showed his true colors but that doesn’t make him non-creepy. I think the way to not be manipulative here is to say he’s like to do XYZ and then have sex, or whatever clear euphemism we are using for having sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/26 12:59 PM
–

Reproduction isn’t the same as boning but I’d be curious to see your source anyway
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/26 10:37 PM
–

No see when men do it it’s logical but when women do it they’re just hypergamous duh
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/26 10:33 PM
7

Tell me you don’t think you can turn any woman on without telling me
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/26 10:30 PM
16

She said what the exception to every is. What’s the problem?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/26 10:29 PM
1

Someone interested in a relationship won’t stop becoming interested because sex is introduced. Someone who was just putting in an effort to try to get sex out of it will stop putting in the effort, sure, but how is that a bad thing? At least this way they show their true colors early.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/26 04:31 AM
1

I feel like if there is mutual interest you as a guy should be able to tell unless you can’t read signals. Then you ask her out. You might have to go out on a limb more if you can’t read signals but just be polite.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/26 03:42 PM
-1

Very few people care if you strike up conversation briefly. It’s inability to take a hint that’s the problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/26 03:27 PM
1

Facetious Counterpoint: “If the manosphere is wrong, why are the snake oil salesmen all from the manosphere? The marketplace of ideas just can’t support bp grifters.”
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/26 03:22 PM
1

Unlike the other serial killers who aren’t fringe lunatics because I guess TRP wants to emulate them because they got laid?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/26 03:43 PM
3

You should probably look up why a contract is different than a record (birth certificate) and how a birth certificate itself doesn’t establish legal parentage. Also a sworn statement means literally signed when it says “under penalty of perjury.” Like an affidavit.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/26 10:18 AM
1

“Normal women are fucking these guys.”
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/26 09:01 AM
3

You don’t know what a sworn statement is, got it.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/26 09:00 AM
1

Counterpoint: no one fucked Elliot Rodger so being a murderer isn’t as good for getting laid as some seem to claim.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/26 08:58 AM
4

You can steal a penny or a million dollars, then. Whatever.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/26 03:51 AM
9

And? All restitution depends on the damage caused by the exact circumstance of the crime. A drunk driver can cause zero dollars in damage or millions, for example.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/26 01:34 AM
8

Depends on where you live. Google your local laws and then try to figure out if sentences are served or suspended (probation).
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/26 10:59 PM
57

Assuming a knowingly false sworn statement, it’s the same as any other perjury. No need to reinvent the wheel. Anything else is just the normal bullshit of people lying to each other that the law’s not involved in.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/26 07:41 PM
1

The straw feminists are out there policing men dating younger women and also the straw feminists (and most other people) don’t give two shits about Tobey Maguire, got it.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/26 07:32 PM
2

Men were always going to push back the more they lost social status of being “above” women. Andrew Tate was inevitable.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/26 08:20 PM
1

It depends entirely on the guy’s sense of insecurity
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/26 08:19 PM
–

Sounds like his girl friends already dated Leo and are over him
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/26 06:17 PM
2

Are rich people torturing me by having expensive stuff? Not really, and spending money is far more optional than being a woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/26 11:38 PM
1

OP are you actually lonely because no women will date you or because no woman you want to date will date you? Because there’s a big difference, and if it’s the second one you’re just on the wrong side of the same kind of line you draw for others, both of which being just something that happens.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/26 05:34 AM
4

This is the correct take by the correct TV show
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/26 06:07 AM
7

It’s not about precision of language it’s about whether the usage is insulting. They’re not saying “boys do xyz” or (with limited fringe exceptions) “what’s with the MALES doing _____”
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/26 11:02 PM
1

The high value man you're supposedly racing to lock down before the wall hits? Supposedly is right. Who thinks like this outside of a Regency novel of manners?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 01:14 AM
11

It’s when you tap out of course
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/26 02:38 PM
2

Why set that boundary though? Like should men be setting boundaries their gf/wife can’t watch Bridgerton orbits a dealbreaker?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/26 11:56 PM
5

People just like what they like through their own unique blend of genetics and formative experiences. You’ll never get a generalizable answer. 90s comedian says: You see men create types like this and women create types like this
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/26 01:37 PM
1

Acquaintance rape and domestic assault cases are extremely easy for suspects to beat without a lot more evidence than he said she said. It’s why charges get dropped all the time. Hell, these days stranger rapes that no one is disputing happened but identification is in dispute has a lot of extra safeguards due to DNA.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/26 06:45 PM
2

Sure they can be believed on a vague recollection. What do you think those mob prosecutions with former hitmen were?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/26 06:41 PM
-2

You are welcome to look up the studies and methodology. Or keep whining about anecdotes about “wrongly accused” men, many of whom obviously are guilty as hell and just mad they got caught. But hey there’s always the outliers that you care so much more about than the many more women who have been attacked.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/26 04:28 PM
8

False accusations are statistically rare. But in any event my personal experience is more of an argument than blanket slippery slope assertions with no evidence like “that’s what it leads to.”
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/26 12:42 PM
1

If you have a bag packed, you are in a shitty relationship due to one partner or the other. It’s not a thing normal healthy relationships have.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/26 05:10 AM
1

There would not be a space (assuming it’s broadly open to straight men) where the shittier men wouldn’t have a sexist reaction to women sharing their thoughts, no.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/26 04:39 AM
1

“I should reenact the thing I find most obnoxious about some individuals I can find in the gender I am sexually attracted to. Fellas, am I justified in being a dumbass?”
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 09:02 PM
5

It’s hardly logical if you have to call it “male logic”. It’s just stuff dudes do that they are used to treating as the default.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 08:57 PM
9

It is amazing how quickly we got from feeling judged by women to “false sexual harassment and/or sa charge.” And for the record I’m not some tall hot dude. I’ve never been accused of harassment or assault for expressing interest in a woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 08:46 PM
7

You have guys tweeting about never washing their ass or such because that would be gay, but even if we write all that off as performative shitposting men in everyday life do illogical shit all the time Punching walls to express anger? Why don’t they find a healthier outlet, or simply not get angry in the first place since they’re these beings of pure logic and reason? Punching family members to express anger? Ditto but even more destructive Voting for Trump? Enough said. Have fun getting worse h…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 06:30 PM
9

Lol Looks at manosphere Roflol even
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 06:02 PM
29

Women are allowed to have a reaction about how they’re being asked out even if it’s just a preference or an ick or whatever. If you take a no without being an asshole and move on most will have the maturity to brush it off.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 03:53 PM
26

Yeah a lot of this type of question “why don’t women” could just as easily be “why do men”
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 04:33 AM
14

No fucking kidding. Is he mad his mom wants him to settle down with a nice girl and “mom” becomes “women” generally?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/26 04:44 PM
–

Women have been telling men to get their shit together long before 2026 and helping/supporting them doing so. Stop pretending it’s the fault of the Straw Feminists.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/26 04:39 PM
4

They shouldn’t say stuff like that but basically it has no effect on my life whereas women have dealt with a lot more sexism actually limiting their lives historically and still in areas like online harassment, non-online sexual harassment, and violence.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/26 11:15 PM
1

Okay, but what is the source for those number?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/26 10:15 PM
5

How exactly is the “single rate” of 62 vs 31 percent arrived at and where does that stat come from?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/26 11:47 PM
2

She didn’t make it up tho https://np.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/1tb6t52/redpillers_are_yall_so_jaded_that_being_liked_is/ Lots of comments here are exactly what she’s talking about. (Reposting this because I got an auto moderator message to change the link to non-posting)
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/26 10:35 PM
28

This lady gets it. I don’t think this is true. I think men get enjoyment from the things that women do too This is correct. The guys suggesting otherwise are weirdos and that probably makes it much harder to break out of inceldom.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/26 05:22 PM
1

Either way let’s stop pretending it’s some major tragedy in people’s lives their partner’s not really attracted or whatever.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/26 05:13 PM
35

Men should influence other men to fuck each other so they stop moaning about not getting laid. What’s the big deal? It’s just bros influencing other bros standards.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/26 05:10 PM
3

Oh no a fictional movie wasn’t real
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/26 11:20 AM
-3

We don’t all know that at all. I see plenty of hot girl/bald fat guy combos.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/26 04:04 AM
3

Of course when they don’t protect (mostly male) criminals we will hear the opposite complaints that the justice system is misandrist on behalf of women.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/26 09:28 PM
1

I can’t speak to everyone ever who vented on the internet. On PPD there are plenty of guys who, even if they don’t explicitly say they are owed a relationship/sex, are in favor of government policies they think will get them a better shot at relationships/sex at the expense of women’s autonomy.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/26 02:29 PM
5

Counterpoint: People should be honest about their intentions.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/26 04:57 PM
–

I would never call a woman unattractive/ugly. That would be a shitty thing to do. I’m sure most women understand this and have no desire to do something like that on their end. The only time that kind of thing should be said is if the person straight up asks you and wants an honest answer, and the polite way to answer is just that they are not your type.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/26 11:25 PM
–

lol keep telling yourself that buddy. You said we were changing the regime or whatever and I pointed out that clearly isn’t happening. As the orange man keeps saying, we’re very close to a deal, aka declaring victory and going home because gas number too high.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/26 01:38 PM
–

You’re the one who brought this tangent up dude don’t be a coward with this “it’s irrelevant” hand waving.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/26 12:18 PM
–

The result is clearly not going to be regime change. And his motives are totally relevant to his lack of commitment to seeing regime change, which, to be clear, would absolutely require a significant land war and not the kind of dick-waving air campaign Trump loves.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/26 11:18 AM
1

How would you know?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/26 10:43 PM
2

Well Trump isn’t invading or otherwise changing the regime and only cares about the quick gratification of a bombing campaign to look tough/get rid of a nuclear program he said he already destroyed/boost Israel’s regional strength, so good luck with that.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/26 10:40 PM
1

Stop chasing women who value aspire to being rich guys’ army candy and you won’t have this problem. Yes it still helps to be good looking, no one said it didn’t.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/26 10:27 PM
9

Speak for yourself. Women love to see it when I tell other men how to be a gentleman instead of a weird little chud.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/26 12:52 PM
4

Don’t you think this has more to do with lack of social skills being readily apparent then whether someone without those skills might be autistic and therefore might be demisexual?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/26 12:35 AM
0

Oh, okay, so really your question is “if the world at large ain’t so bad why are there unhappy people?” It’s a uninteresting question on its own because by that logic every deviation from the norm proves the norm must be bad.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/26 05:30 PM
0

If red pill worked why would the blue pill exist?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/26 06:05 AM
3

Yeah, how many and who are we talking about? Because there’s a lot of work being done by “women say X” and “but women also say Y” here. And it’s mostly not the same ones doing both.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/26 09:49 PM
8

That straw woman who both hates and loves controlling behaviors sure does sound challenging to date. I guess don’t date her if you find her.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/26 07:31 PM
1

If the manosphere is any indicator, a lot of them really want validation from other men and sex with women is just performatively instrumental to that. Really though most people want what they don’t always get easily.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/26 08:51 PM
3

Most men aren’t “violent troublemakers” with glaring personality disorders. What you are calling social games is really just socialization for the most part. Even puppies learn from other dogs not to bite, or they themselves will be bitten/growled at. Is that being fake?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/26 08:27 PM
25

Attractive men do not actually have carte blanche to walk up to a random woman out of the blue and make a sexual comment or ask her to smash. Anything like that escalates through, at minimum, signals and some kind of flirting or other context.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/26 03:18 PM
–

Sigma male shit = just astrology for dudes Also doesn’t having a bunch of rules undermine how you supposedly are a lone wolf who doesn’t care about the rules?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/26 12:39 PM
-5

Who is expecting you to feel guilty?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/26 01:32 AM
7

Good thing I’m not a company, and by being worth a damn men can also attract women who are worth a damn instead of their Gilead-issued econowives.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/26 01:52 PM
–

Cry more about it. Or you can work on yourself to be more in demand rather than promote a system that allows everyone to as shitty as possible. In market terms that RP claims to love, we all benefit more when there’s competition and not a company store. Except the company store.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/26 01:45 PM
2

Mansplaino sighed as he drew his katana.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 09:23 PM
2

We have no idea if she cheated.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 08:40 PM
1

How do we know this hot guy you made up in your head won’t cheat on her?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 08:40 PM
1

I’m simply expressing what I see as a reality that is not often openly discussed It’s super commonly and openly discussed. That’s literally what “put a ring on it” is about.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 08:31 PM
1

A dick is just a single body feature. Liking a body part isn’t really a sexual orientation.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 01:13 AM
0

Eye of the beholder. But the key point is that these “high value men” wouldn’t be broken up with and wouldn’t b shot down or they were indeed “high value.”
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/26 06:42 AM
0

Then why is it mostly men getting broken up with? “Value” is only what the market will support if we insist on breaking down humans in these economic terms.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/26 11:39 PM
1

The reason people don’t like it is because of people obnoxiously not taking the hint and the repeat nature of having to deal with that from multiple sources.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/26 11:46 PM
1

If that’s true* then discard/destroy the shell. Every manchild following Andrew Tate should absolutely be publicly scorned. *I don’t buy that it is true. People didn’t need a bunch of weirdos telling them looks matter etc because everyone already knew that.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/26 09:01 PM
6

People are sick of the red pill because they’re sick of god damned chuds and manosphere bros.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/26 03:09 PM
10

Yeah does each of these guys individually think he’s the only one doing sex tourism?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/26 04:14 PM
1

A huge portion of incel world is emotional venting about not getting laid. A therapist is surely better to talk to about it than 4chan.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/26 12:52 PM
–

Why label them broken and bad and how is that the same as “make better choices”? Maybe they are bad judges of character but that’s different.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/26 09:32 PM
–

I suppose a sociopath would never want any kind of relationship beyond casual sex, yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/26 07:41 PM
0

See the issue is you are treating women as interchangeable and thinking in terms of this PUA world of how many girls you can pull instead of any personal qualities let alone relationship material. The most interesting women (I assume you’d call them the highest SMV or whatever) know they don’t have to put up with a lot of bullshit.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/26 04:16 PM
3

A lot of men are written off for shitty behavior by a lot of women. You are in fact going to have fewer option by acting shitty.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/26 03:14 PM
3

Currently the countries that draft men only are in fact strongly sexist. The US is irrelevant to this discussion because it doesn’t actually draft anyone. And if it did those who served would receive a bunch of veterans benefits and preferences.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/26 10:09 PM
3

Something’s either a want or a need.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/26 03:44 AM
12

Your argument is a real “heads I win tails you lose” here. First you say that sex isn’t a need or more men would hire prostitutes. Then you say sex can’t be a want because more men aren’t hiring prostitutes!
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/26 12:08 AM
18

Sex isn’t a need but plenty of men want it for the pleasure of it. This insistence that everyone does everything just for status really ignores how private people often are about various things they do. And yes plenty of men are private about their sex lives.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/26 11:55 PM
–

No shame here. Just act decent and it’s fine. Note the key is what you do, not the attraction you feel.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/26 10:44 AM
-6

So all the 12 year old boys watching these manosphere weirdos are just drawing on their deep experience with the dating market? Okay then.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/26 05:49 AM
2

Nowhere does 63 percent of crime being committed by 1 percent of people support a claim that 3 percent (or 1 percent) of men are violent. For starters there’s a whole 37 percent of crime to account for and there’s no guarantee it all falls within the 2nd and 3rd percentile. Edit: Also this is only Sweden that’s being sampled apparently and it only includes comvictions. This ignores the many different ways a case could end in dismissal or acquittal for reasons that have little to do with whether …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/26 10:41 PM
17

What is your source for the 3 percent of men claim?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/26 04:02 PM
1

Okay, how?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/26 07:47 PM
3

A lot of things are evocative of other things, but a funhouse mirror by definition grossly distorts the objects and people it reflects. If I draw human proportions as they appear in a funhouse mirror, you could conclude I have no understanding of how human beings actually are shaped.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/26 06:25 PM
2

I’ve never seen a simp then other than maybe a few losers who no woman wants. The guys who only care about looks and getting laid only chase hookups.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/26 04:25 PM
3

The internet isn’t real life hth
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/26 04:22 PM
18

They are trying to justify being creepers, specifically
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/26 04:02 AM
1

Sounds like republicans are the problem instead of women
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/26 03:55 AM
0

People do assimilate. Like literally that is what the public school system does.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/26 07:49 PM
0

In the spirit of debate, I’ll ask if you can provide a reason for them being supposedly better off other than racism or if you believe ethnostates can exist without racism (or ethnic supremacism, which I consider the same thing).
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/26 12:32 AM
0

Like hell it has to go up. They’ll just automate that much faster. But either way of course rather than rounding up immigrants the govt could just actually penalize businesses heavily for not lawfully employing people. That would the stop salary dumping that can’t be automated and significantly reduce illegal immigration. Because business interests must always be appeased in politics that won’t happen and powerless immigrants just get harassed instead.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/26 11:50 AM
-3

Not really. No one in most countries even wants to do the immigrants’ jobs and shitty low wage work far predates the supposed “migration crisis” weird reactionaries keep complaining about, so no immigration isn’t the reason the rich keep exploiting the poor.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/26 10:10 AM
9

You're enabling junkies and big pharma cartel is happy to supply women their happy pills. ok rfk
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/26 10:05 AM
-1

No actually it’s good and being a weird xenophobic society like Japan is bad
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/26 10:03 AM
5

I strongly recommend taking medicine when you have a disease. But anyway living life like it’s the 19th century for men and women has its own drawbacks.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/26 09:59 AM
16

Nowhere is it written the population must be ever expanding or stay at a constant number, and most low birth rate countries can just allow more immigration if they want more kids
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/26 05:23 AM
43

Those guys who bathed once a month in the creek were just too hot for the ladies back then.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/26 02:08 AM
71

It is good people aren’t marrying for money as much and if that means fewer marriages that is just fine.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/26 01:38 AM
2

And for those of us living in the US just about every woman could go buy a gun and use force to end men and then there’d be no red pill. Guess what, no one deserves brownie points for not imposing their will violently.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/26 01:34 AM
-1

“I had a green light 90 percent of the time” because women would just be making the first move by grabbing the D but also these women needed aggressive courting/body language. Okay.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/26 01:31 AM
3

Indeed men were conscripting men even in premodern times when absolutely everyone in government and clergy (the only two power centers of society) were all men.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/26 01:25 AM
-2

If they were truly so off-base, they would be dismissed and ignored. By this logic any belief, no matter how bad or out there, is correct. Racism? Well, people believe it. Nazism, communism, Scientology. People didnt dismiss or ignore it so the people have spoken. It’s BS.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/26 01:16 AM
0

Men as protectors really just means men as violence doers. And every time violence is used for protection (actual protection, not a bullshit excuse to do violence) it’s only because violence was used for aggression first. So really men being the protectors would be canceled out in the big picture by men as aggressors. Whether non violence can be protective is another conversation but it’s not what’s generally meant by people calling men protectors.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/26 05:30 AM
–

Really? I think the readership is heavily redpill-y or incels and upvotes a lot of stuff from that perspective.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/26 02:44 AM
1

If you "don't understand" that vehicles can be used as a deadly weapon or believe that he should have just "let her go" then you clearly prioritize emotional convenience over objective facts. Ah yes I can clearly see your posts are only about objectivity and not emotion.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/26 06:06 PM
–

The red pill is a reactionary right wing social movement, you say? Who knew? Any of the so called bureaucratic bloat of feminism is equally evident anywhere else. Tech bros and manosphere “influencers” are grifting us all with crypto schemes and using ChatGPT to make business and government decisions, for instance. We’re paying to fly Kash Patel to hockey games and UFC events. Hell, we’re paying for SWAT teams to bodyguard his girlfriend while she pursues an entertainment career. Oh, and now we’…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/26 02:48 AM
1

I agree it is negative stereotyping of women in that it’s assumed (by some) to be somehow super widespread and typical of women. But it’s also considered a negative trait in men. The “boy toy” hanging around a rich older lady doesn’t exactly have a good reputation, he’s just less represented in the popular imagination. As for whether there’s anything wrong with that, not really as long as it’s not dishonest. You can see why someone would be hurt if they felt led on and used for money or sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 09:33 PM
3

For example: There are really famous songs about women being “gold diggers” and there aren’t good counterparts where a man is criticized just for wanting sex (as opposed to cheating). Even a recent song like New Rules which sort of hints about an ex boyfriend wanting sex rather than a serious relationship is mostly framed as instructions for women to follow the “Rules” for getting over the guy than criticizing the guy.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 09:25 PM
1

I was talking about women not being held accountable at parity with men, what did you think I was talking about? The OP topic that I’ve been talking about: "in-group sensationalism and overdramatization"
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 12:46 PM
2

I’ve heard nothing about per capita dramatics backing your assertion, so it appears you’re just talking shit. But hey you dressed up your lack of data with fancy words and a non sequitur about criminal sentencing, so good for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 04:03 AM
2

Even if this highly context dependent generalization were shown to be true, it doesn’t really mean men aren’t sensationalist and over dramatic. Hell, most American politicians are men, and politicians are some of the biggest drama queens you can find.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 02:26 AM
11

As opposed to men who definitely don’t have in-group sensationalism and overdramatization. Especially not around these parts.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/26 04:59 PM
–

What a novel OP on this sub. Never seen that one before. I guess the women will just have to live with you not approaching them, king. I’m sure they’re really mad about it and everything, especially since you have such a thoughtful and non-hyperbolic view of women as a group.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/26 04:38 PM
3

Most people don’t want to write checks their ass can’t cash. Yeah everyone wants to punch Andrew Tate in the mouth but if it’s not realistic isn’t that the real virtue signaling?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/26 07:44 PM
3

Belief systems that lead to dehumanization can logically lead to treating others as less than human. But no particular ideology is necessary to sexual predators since they can come from all different backgrounds. Without statistical analysis this is a very anecdotal discussion, and even if we had the stats in front of us correlation =/= causation. For example, say (controlling for gender) we found men with bigoted beliefs against X were 50% more likely to be rapists. There’s a chicken/egg proble…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/26 04:09 AM
1

Everything comes from genes in the same sense that everything comes from culture. It’s a meaningless handwave on its own.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/26 06:00 PM
2

I am disputing a genetic cause
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/26 03:09 AM
–

If it’s the natural outcome (for heterosexuals) why are the manosphere/looksmaxx influencers so gay? Not in an insulting sense but in the literal sense of treating sex with women as a chore/marker of status (in other words, a beard), in the sense of spending all their time caring what other men think of their bodies and trying to change their appearance to meet the standards of men in their communities.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/26 12:24 AM
9

This is evopsych bullshit. There’s no “prefer younger if you’re a guy, prefer older if you’re a woman” gene.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/26 12:17 AM
3

23 years old and no relationship experience is not a firm basis to say what the best system is for everyone. Marriage is great for some, not great for others, and not of interest to still others.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/26 06:29 PM
83

lol “shows his value” … no one knows how much casual sex you’ve had unless you talk like this. Then they’ll assume not any.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/26 04:07 PM
0

How is feminism suppose to stop this? By making it less socially acceptable. In practice this means people who do it are ostracized more. For example, if a sex offender is living in a community a lot of people get really upset about it. They don’t say anything about the wife beater next door.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/26 05:29 PM
3

The op is about TRP, which seems to attach men’s status to things like looks and money
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/26 05:27 PM
3

What men are low status? For purposes of this discussion I think it would be men who red pill considers low status.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/26 05:02 PM
0

In general, what will support of feminism look like? Where modern western women are oppressed or unequal today? At a minimum, reproductive freedom is part of that support. As for where, Google where abortion is banned or significantly restricted and start there. I bet women want to be injured and murdered a lot less by intimate partners too. That’s without even mentioning issues of sexual assault, harassment in the workplace, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/26 04:59 PM
1

This is silly. Find someone who’s not in the 30 percent.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/26 01:40 PM
3

She is very assertive all the time and always was that way with him. I’m sure it’s what attracted him to her. My point isn’t that she’s like every girl out there, it’s just that she’s not being sexist anymore than a guy is sexist just for being assertive, or non assertive for that matter.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/26 01:27 AM
4

There could be any number of things it’s the “result of” but it doesn’t prove most women are sexist.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/26 11:30 PM
3

I didn’t say that. I said I know women who would be pissed by a man insisting on these things and ignoring her wishes.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/26 09:48 PM
3

The ones you know may want that but that doesn’t mean they want sexism. Let’s look at the counter example: I know a woman who is super assertive including over her husband. She takes more initiative and seems to prefer it that way in their relationship. Does that make her casually sexist against men?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/26 09:46 PM
2

OP’s experience is not everyone’s experience either. He’s the one making broad claims about “most women” here.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/26 09:43 PM
-6

All this stuff would piss women I know off. I don’t see them “preferring” it.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/26 06:13 PM
0

It’s a joke bro
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/26 06:11 PM
4

Is it sexist to only have sex with women? Asking for a friend.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/26 05:15 PM
6

What examples can OP give?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/26 03:27 PM
17

What acts of casual sexism are you talking about?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/26 02:46 PM
–

What a savage competition you’ve observed. And by observed I mean invented. And by you I mean AI.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/26 09:55 PM
1

I’m nothing special to look at, not rich etc and still don’t have to do any of that red/blackpill stuff.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/26 10:41 PM
14

No one here is claiming being upset is a moral failing.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/26 09:33 AM
0

I was told looks and height were enough! Oh no now I gotta treat people like human beings?!
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/26 03:42 AM
7

Almost all these claims are false but I’ll focus on the last one. “Being canceled” is rare but some ideologies are worthy of scorn. I’m not crying over here people don’t coddle Twitter Nazis or whatever.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/26 04:52 AM
1

Worrying about performing it does
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/26 08:42 PM
4

I don’t need to appeal to most women. I just need to appeal to the smart and attractive ones I’m into. If you act like a meathead you attract meathead women. It’s not hard.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/26 06:44 PM
3

I didn’t know until now I was top 5%. Thanks bro!
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/26 05:44 PM
–

By this logic any leftist must think that all parenting expenses must be paid by the government and parents should use their own earnings only on themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/26 07:24 AM
3

There’s plenty of sex on screen still, especially when you include prestige television like HBO. And plenty of scantily clad women in tamer media.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/26 04:13 AM
1

We need more divorced dads with steroid tits hawking supplements on their podcasts teaching these young dudes to fuck. Clearly superior to every movie star.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/26 04:10 AM
2

I don’t think men are in need of mild sex scenes in mainstream films to understand sex. There was a time when movies really didn’t have sex. Hell, men have been around a lot longer than movies in the first place.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/26 04:03 AM
8

There are many plenty of guys who are honest and decent and get hella laid IRL. And Superman (or s bunch of superhero stories) is a great example in media, not sure why we’d expect there to be sex scenes in the type of media that explicitly avoids/minimizes them. Plenty of good guys consume porn so that’s also not a primary cause IMO.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/26 11:29 PM
1

There’s a diffferencd between a filter and dishonesty.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/26 02:11 PM
-1

Believe it or not plenty of people don’t care about this juvenile bullshit of who needs to be approached or how confident a guy acts. PPD pretends we are in a bad high school drama from the 90s-2000s.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/26 05:34 AM
1

No plenty of people skip a lot of bullshit and aren’t single. They find people who like them for who they are and not some performance.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/26 05:31 AM
3

If you don’t like performing an aspect of stereotypical masculinity, just don’t do it. You have plenty of choice in the matter.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/26 03:50 AM
1

I’m saying you’re getting rights and privileges mixed up. Physical safety is a right. The guys are also physically safe online so that’s equal. Someone choosing to give you sexual access, in this case digitally, is a privilege. Someone choosing to buy your content rather than saying no thanks is also a privilege. No one’s being made to do anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/26 06:30 AM
3

0 risk of harm Not being physically harmed/killed (except if a stalker finds them) is a privilege now?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/26 07:11 PM
0

A nice guy isn’t every male friend who shoots his shot. It’s a guy posing as a friend to shoot his shot.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/26 09:03 PM
–

They will regret it and look back cringing but the fact they buy all this shit for a few years shows they weren’t ready for a real relationship anyways.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/26 06:40 AM
–

This reads like fan fiction where he needs a good woman to swoop in and save him from the bad woman you’ve visualized in your mind. Why not just leave a relationship that’s bad for him if he’s that awesome and insightful?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/26 06:05 AM
11

You don’t have classmates and coworkers to socialize with?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/26 12:32 AM
1

Everyone’s a sad basement dweller now but I’d rather Reddit than facebook
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/26 01:42 AM
1

Okay, but how much homework have you done on this? Sounds a lot like shooting from the hip. Are women even more phobic toward by men than non-bisexual men? And how strongly is the dislike correlated with conservative social beliefs, which are a huge indicator that any given woman is not a feminist.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/26 11:09 PM
-1

Because you don’t know if the smaller subset of feminists shares the belief. It’s like if you survey Republican opinions on same sex marriage and say it proves what gay Republicans believe.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/26 10:05 PM
-1

Yes it is a stretch. You’re just guessing here dawg.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/26 04:46 PM
1

No it doesn’t mean that. Plenty of women do much more than “bring around.”
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/26 04:45 PM
2

His solution is to step up and talk to women. Hell, if he can’t manage it in a normal environment at first bring money to a strip club and buy dances. (An extreme example but it’s a way to practice with women who talk to men for a living. Just say “I want to talk but I’m shy” if you run into trouble.) Other than that, just cultivate a social circle that includes women in it. If the guy is as attractive as the hypothetical says there will be women who signal their interest in him. Thinking about …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/26 02:35 AM
2

Right. This hypothetical guy would still be able to find a relationship because if he’s that great he’s probably going to have women expressing interest in him as long as he has a social circle that includes women in it. Literally all he would have to do is accept an invitation to hang out with the woman who’s interested (assuming he is also interested) or at worst his friends would clue him in to ask her out as a definite yes if she doesn’t ask first.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/26 02:26 AM
1

Some guys were never gonna get laid no matter the era outside of arranged marriage.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/26 08:51 PM
0

Where is the evidence of biphobia among feminists, especially as compared to non-feminists?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/26 08:32 PM
1

I think there’s a lot of marketing that goes into this from religious conservatives in the US. It’s always been there but in an era with more and more formal equality it has become useful to promote more women as spokespeople for “traditional values” so that they can appeal to other women.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/26 08:29 PM
7

You should be friends with people because you like their company, not in hopes of having sex with them. Problem solved.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/26 05:14 PM
–

Sure it’s close minded, and it would make me question if someone knows how to have fun the more activities they close off as being not approved. If someone doesn’t want to date you over this they’re the ones disqualifying themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/25 09:12 PM
-1

To me the manosphere guys are weak, incredibly weak. Imagine needing a podcast bro to tell you how to live, date, have sex, and marry. Doesn’t matter how much protein you consume or MMA you do. That’s weak as shit. The bottom line is increased depression in society makes people grasp for saviors and there’s a ton of false prophets.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/25 12:16 AM
3

Yes making friends is part of meeting people. It doesn’t have to be on a rooftop.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/25 06:34 AM
2

Anyone who is worried about cold approaching no longer being a thing (as if it ever was one) has consumed too much PUA content or whatever that stuff is called nowadays.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/25 06:26 AM
3

I’ve never heard a woman say that as a specific reason for ghosting. Some men will get violent if they ghost too. So sure, it might not often be the “real reason” but it’s not often women are saying it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/25 12:00 AM
1

I think the aesthetic taste is part of it but a lot of guys assume an unstable women is more likely to have sex with them.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/25 11:42 PM
2

Tell me you don’t know many women without telling me.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/25 11:39 PM
8

Most women have FWBs and most relationships come from hookups? Yeah I think citation needed there.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/25 11:26 PM
1

What is the question you feel is not being answered?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/25 07:48 PM
0

You just don’t like that I’m not agreeing with your premise that women aren’t actually afraid that men will hurt them and are just lying about all that. You disguise this premise with a rhetorical question about why they often find big strong guys attractive. I am challenging the logic of your argument but I did answer your question as well. To repeat, people like what they like. There’s nothing logically incoherent about being attracted to physically fit people and being concerned about intimat…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/25 07:43 PM
2

If they weren’t afraid of physical harm they wouldn’t do things like tell their friends where they’re meeting a guy for a date. Just because their threat processing doesn’t operate like yours doesn’t mean it’s not a thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/25 07:38 PM
2

He’s either a guy who would decide to physically hurt them or not. Why does it matter how easy it will be for him physically as long as he can do it?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/25 07:22 PM
2

Most men (without a disability that affects strength and mobility a lot) can beat up most women. The safety risk is there either way. It’s about whether he will lash out physically at her, not how good he’d be in the Octagon.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/25 05:44 PM
1

No, I’m saying sexual assault and harassment on trains is a real problem. Japan is famous for this. https://www.france24.com/en/tv-shows/focus/20250305-sexual-harassment-on-public-transport-japan-tries-to-tackle-problem-of-chikan
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/25 05:41 PM
1

You really don’t know what’s happening on the trains in those Asian countries?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/25 06:57 AM
0

And yet most men have sex and enter into relationships with women. Who’s really doing the coping?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/25 06:56 AM
14

If this Chad’s a live-in bone buddy either he’s not a 9 or she’s not a 5.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/25 02:30 AM
1

While family has an influence on political beliefs it’s not absolute. Also you’d need to look at if more children total are born to conservative women or liberal women. Certainly the stereotype is one side is more likely than the other to have kids and especially have big families
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/25 04:56 AM
–

Society already is set up to deal with false allegations. Criminally, all allegations are held to proof beyond a reasonable doubt, for example.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/25 09:44 PM
–

Very few of those will get much reaction at all in the real world, tbh
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/25 09:40 PM
1

Yeah they’re some real fish gallopers on this sub
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/25 02:03 PM
1

I don’t buy that SpongeBob is a kids’ thing anymore. It’s geared at nostalgic 35-year olds.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/25 05:26 AM
2

You’re assuming emotional immaturity. Some people can handle rejection and keep on trucking.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/25 05:21 AM
–

Integrity. Concern for others. Fun to be around (the opposite of a whiner). Common genuine interests or at least be passionate about something interesting.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/25 10:55 PM
–

Then you should have confidence there are plenty of people who’d be happy to be your friend. Just show you have the qualities people value in a friend. It’s not usually “has sex.” At most some personality traits that turn people off from a person as a sexual partner can also make you not be friendship material.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/25 10:39 PM
–

No one cares if you’re getting laid. The issue is that no one wants to be friends with a whiner.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/25 10:23 PM
0

Yeah people hate Jennifer Lawrence’s personality how could she ever get a date lol
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/25 07:15 PM
1

Yeah “getting in a relationship” usually involves a lot more than just immediately going up to a stranger and signaling sexual interest. Be social and get to know people. Don’t try to be a weird PUA, which is only a way of talking to as many women as possible until you find one who agrees to sex, much like swiping right on every tinder profile.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/25 04:08 PM
1

There’s no friendzone. She just never was attracted in the first place.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/25 03:53 PM
1

If you’re having chatting success as you get older it’s probably down to increased confidence or at least developing social skills and personality
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/25 04:43 AM
5

Not getting laid isn’t injustice sorry
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/25 11:00 PM
3

4b is more like MGTOW, it’s not that they can’t have sex or relationships. Yeah it’s cringe if it’s “all men are like this” but if they’re choosing to stay single that’s their business.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/25 08:25 PM
3

Nope I have a problem with whining. And making a movement out of not getting laid is some grade A whiner shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/25 08:23 PM
1

The problem here is thinking of approaching or not approaching. If a woman is into you this can be figured out through context clues when you get to know each other. The more people you talk to the more likely it is this will happen in your expanding social circle with one or more women. Just talk to people and be social! Stop playing this PUA approach game.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/25 08:21 PM
3

Where is the female incel movement? Point em out and I’ll make fun of it. I don’t see a lot of them making a whole identity out of not getting laid.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/25 08:07 PM
1

If it was both people making the same drunk decision in the moment to fuck neither one is probably going to say they were raped
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/25 08:05 PM
1

Most of the abusers are love bombers, not 1% viscerally attractive guys (they can be abusers too, but only about 1% of them)
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/25 07:58 PM
6

Because someone made a decision. Genitals don’t penetrate each other by accident.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/25 07:56 PM
0

Not for reported sexual assaults
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/25 07:54 PM
1

Kind of the red pill’s collective fault for not holding men accountable when they go all incel whiner then
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/25 07:52 PM
2

Women are teaching men that. It’s not their fault a lot of dudes don’t listen.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/25 07:50 PM
5

Absolutely if they’re out there complaining the world owes them a partner
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/25 07:48 PM
2

People do it all the time and it is not illegal. They’re attracted to who they’re attracted to. Most couples are not interracial but only a weirdo goes around pointing his finger at every same-race couple and calling them bigots. Next you guys will be complaining that you’re discriminated against because a single woman is in a monogamous relationship and doesn’t want to service all of you.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/25 07:44 PM
2

Possible isn’t the same thing as likely
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/25 07:39 PM
-1

Yeah cause I’m not a simpsons character
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/25 07:39 PM
-2

Don’t complain about data unless you’re bringing your own, dawg. 🤷🏻‍♂️
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/25 07:34 PM
1

Both are rape by deception so I can see why there should be legal penalties. And by the way there’s no real conflict between feminism and believing rape by deception is a thing. Edit: Also to be clear it’s a direct deception about the sex itself rather than “they lied about their religion or job or being single” which (although shitty) seems to me to be different.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/25 07:07 PM
0

Another way of looking at that stat, if we take it at face value, means in the ugliest possible context of custody battles where people are going all out to keep the kids there is only a false accusation rate of 10% so it’s nine times more likely the allegation is true. Nine to one is great odds if you’re betting on something being true.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/25 06:58 PM
0

I know of plenty of guys who were charged with (and probably committed) sexual assault. They’re doing fine if they weren’t convicted. Even some of the ones who were convicted. It’s a fucking myth that this ruins oh so many lives, especially next to the trauma of being raped, which, by the way, women often keep to themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/25 06:53 PM
4

If you are drunk and conscious and have sex with a drunk person who’s not conscious, which is how these things happen, that’s rape. It’s not actually that hard.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/25 06:46 PM
0

Who consciously made the decision to start the penetration? In short, who was on top? Doesn’t sound like that person didn’t know what they were doing.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/25 06:43 PM
–

Women find all kinds of “ugly” guys (by so-called traditional male standards) attractive. Not all women, but enough for them to date and if they don’t have noxious personalities, marry. Thats why Benedict Cumberbatch gets plenty of women going. (Rimshot)
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/25 06:30 PM
4

Regardless of what they call it women do that emotional labor all the time and more than men do in relationships
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/25 03:16 PM
–

Social media influencing still ain’t real life. Thank god.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/25 03:57 AM
1

No. Once you go true love you never go back.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/25 11:26 PM
–

I disagree that there is this huge wave of anti-male hate. But let’s say there is. That doesn’t require men to act any differently. At the end of the day we are all responsible for our own actions even if someone else is acting poorly. OP doesn’t seem to acknowledge that the Tate stuff and anti abortion extremism is men deciding to become shittier, not deciding to stay in place.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/25 04:33 PM
–

You are ignoring the reactionary nature of Tate gaining a following, of abortion bans in the US, and a bunch of other sexually regressive attitudes driven largely by men.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/25 05:13 AM
1

There are plenty of bad relationships out there that happen because one or both sides didn’t have a high enough standard.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/25 05:01 PM
–

Awkward man here. I’ve been cut plenty of slack. Especially by awkward women.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/25 02:11 PM
–

We were talking about dying alone which doesn’t have much to do with getting multiple sexual partners
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/25 03:49 AM
1

You wouldn’t want a dick to be chewed up like stick of gum before you got it.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/25 08:38 PM
–

Then why are so many non AH dudes not dying alone?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/25 07:37 PM
–

Disagree. I’m nothing special and have had plenty of opportunities.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/25 07:36 PM
–

Talk to people appropriately and you’ll be fine
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/25 07:34 PM
1

It’s a very weird relationship but anything that’s ongoing is a type of relationship I guess if you’re looking for a definition. It would be difficult to raise a kid without working as a team but I suppose it would be like any two single parents working around shared custody and exchanging the kid at different points.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/25 04:57 PM
–

The men who do take the advice don’t annoy women and give good signs that they’re not creeps. That is huge.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/25 04:51 PM
3

Why invent a hypothetical guy who has it so hard and a hypothetical lady who has it so easy? What’s the purpose?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/25 06:44 PM
5

While community building is a laudable goal, no one should be compelled to conform to norms other than the obvious. (Don’t hurt others, don’t engage in sex acts with anyone other than a consenting adult, don’t pollute the town’s water supply which is part of not hurting others.)
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/25 02:32 AM
3

I would love to see loser incel dude rhetoric being made illegal, but we live in a free society so it will just need to be handled with the power or persuasion to get people to grow up.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/25 02:24 AM
1

Percentages have nothing to do with the volume flooding our streets which is what controls the ease of people who seek to harm themselves or others getting a weapon Womp womp
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/25 12:28 AM
1

How many guns in the US were there in the 70s vs now? I’ll wait.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/25 12:09 AM
5

I meant to comment on the suicide discussion so that is the fault of my clumsy fingers. But in fact there are many more firearms in the US than in generations past, and of course many more semiautomatic weapons favored by mass shooters.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/25 12:08 AM
3

Different methods of attempt can have very different levels of lethality.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/25 12:05 AM
8

Interesting how virtually no MRAs who are so concerned about suicides ever talk about firearms being a negative. Instead it’s somehow the women’s fault when dudes blow their own brains out.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/25 08:48 PM
2

I don’t see how mourning the loss of loved ones is making it all about themselves, and there’s far more of that than unskilled political communicators making tone deaf remarks.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/25 06:47 PM
0

I guarantee you men dying in war was considered a big issue in WWI and later independent of women. Basically once democracy became widespread it became an issue. But you’re also playing heads-I-win-tails-you-lose. When women care about men dying in war it’s just further proof of women being selfish to you. Even though they’re politically more anti-war in the first place.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/25 05:55 PM
–

What would change is guys whining about women not approaching would just get more into slut-shaming women for not approaching them.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/25 05:16 PM
1

Don’t be a weirdo who puts your hand on someone like this in a default platonic situation. Ask for a date. Use the words of asking someone on a date!
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/25 03:31 AM
1

Positive signals are pretty obvious. If it’s not pretty obvious you’re not getting a go signal bro.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/25 03:28 AM
3

There are two sides to that coin because there are men who frame rejection by a woman as a moral failing on her part. That’s absolutely how Nice Guys became cringe in the first place.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/25 03:17 AM
1

Okay. I’ll rephrase. I don’t think there is a “type” of person that we can talk about liking and have it be productive. But your OP mentions behaviors so I’ll focus on those. I’d say guys who think they want sex all the time (and aren’t really young and horny) actually only want it more often than female partners they have experience with. There’s plenty of times they’re tired, hungry, have to take a shit and aren’t in the mood. They’d still have a libidi mismatch if they ended up with a nymphom…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/25 03:08 AM
3

I reject the premise. It depends on the man and the woman. No one’s idealized fantasy will be met by a real person so it depends on their attraction to and turn offs from the real person.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/25 01:53 AM
4

Not approaching people is the default in society. Any conversation about why someone doesn’t approach needs to start with “what is the reason that will override the default preference of most human beings where person A should be inclined to approach person B?”
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/25 02:50 PM
1

Sure buddy because that’s what “stop worrying about external validation” means. I think you’ve cracked the Woman Code today.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/25 07:44 AM
3

There is so much time spent turning down or blocking thirsty guys online I don’t think that’s fair
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/25 10:56 PM
1

How are you being asked to bow and scrape? I haven’t experienced any of that.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/25 10:23 PM
1

Dude, being polite and showing women you are safe is the easiest fucking thing. It’s not women’s fault a lot of men are creeps or worse.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/25 05:46 PM
2

So this sub is full of men demanding a generous, progressive Western European style social safety net that can catch male suicidality and homelessness instead of just complaining that they’re not hot enough to get laid, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/25 04:50 PM
–

Being funny
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/25 12:37 PM
1

I agree men often don’t know how to flirt but there’s no right or wrong way to “court” anyone other than to be respectful and back off if they’re not interested.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/25 10:47 PM
1

In this situation the correct response is to either accept that you may only ever be friends and actually want to be friends irrespective of anything else OR I suppose just move along if that’s so unappealing.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/25 10:45 PM
2

If you signal interest early in the friendship there’s no chance of confusion. Any friend zoning just means she probably never would have been attracted. I doubt there is much of a friend zone even later on in terms of guys women would have dated but now won’t. “Let’s just be friends” usually is just a polite way of saying she’s not attracted to you. I feel like the real problem with any of this is a lot of men not knowing how to flirt (as opposed to how to make heavy, clumsy come-ons).
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/25 09:51 PM
1

Becoming friends is an approach. And if you’re friends it’s very easy to signal interest to each other a lot of the time. In other words, any connection is an approach. It’s just that not every approach is hitting on someone or even need be intended as a romantic or sexual overture.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/25 09:25 PM
-3

Any large group has some members who take an outlier position. I’d say far more women have approached men than take the position you’re describing. I’d also say unless “approach” means to bluntly proposition for sex most women are don’t have much with being respectfully approached. Respect includes stuff like not cornering her in an elevator, hitting on her at a relative’s funeral, etc etc. If an approach is just having a conversation and seeing where it goes as something other than a foregone c…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/25 09:03 PM
-2

That’s fine too
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/25 07:46 PM
-2

What’s the big fucking deal? I wouldn’t want to be approached in a disrespectful way by women either?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/25 07:08 PM
5

Is the question why do men imagine a woman would/should do that? Or their best argument for why women should get with them despite not feeling attraction? Because if not this sounds like a question for women, most of whom would not do this in the first place.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/25 03:18 PM
1

Men aren’t being told they can’t approach women, jfc, they’re just expected to be respectful. And any expectation of what a “real man” is just means standards for a p we son they want to date. It doesn’t mean you’re not literally a man, lol. Men pick the kinds of women they like all the time.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/25 03:38 AM
-2

Rare relative to actual physical abuse of women for one. But in fairness I find your description not as crazy as my sarcastic comment made it sound. I do agree that anyone saying they were held down and punched when they weren’t is making a false accusation but screaming at someone smaller/weaker can be a form abusive and intimidating shit. Just saying. Depends on a lot of context and I obviously can’t say anyone on another redditor’s life was/wasn’t lying. I just see a lot of guys lie til they …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/25 03:55 AM
-1

The “unfounded” number could also have errors where they didn’t find the thing that made it “founded” so this is pointless nitpicking. The fact remains that some men sound a lot more worried about a tiny fraction of men being falsely accused then than they do a huge % of women being sexually assaulted. At best it’s a failure to extend empathy beyond the gender line.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/25 03:33 AM
3

No it wasn’t
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/25 03:27 AM
-2

3 out of “hundreds” is rare Assuming we take the random guy on the internet who says he’s been on dates with hundreds of people at face value when he says he’s never did anything wrong towards a woman. (Edited to add this second paragraph was unduly harsh/sarcastic toward someone I don’t know and I regret it)
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/25 03:24 AM
0

When you talk to women respectfully a lot of them tell you what they really think about men. Can’t help it. Not all women etc
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/25 01:10 AM
7

Observe people’s actions. Is he just genuinely like that or is he targeting his supposed kindness toward the person he’s trying to sleep with? Relatedly, not every guy who’s told “you’re a nice guy but” is actually thought of as nice and I think this type of softening the rejection leads some to conclude niceness was the problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/25 11:53 PM
1

Not that I know of. You can be very nice and still be strong. Just use your words to communicate limits and boundaries.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/25 11:48 PM
6

I call bullshit. No one mistakes my kindness for weakness. People are either into you or they’re not.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/25 11:42 PM
1

I don’t think of charisma as being the same thing as spitting game, I guess? It’s actual social strength whether you choose to be more solitary or not, that gets you social status. Yes it’s possible to be rich without it but plenty of awkward rich people get absolutely shut out socially unless they are celebrity-billionaire rich or have some authority (boss, big time patron of the business, etc) that buys them deference. So “social status” is pretty loosely correlated to wealth except situationa…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/25 05:34 PM
1

Social status is a natural byproduct of rizz.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/25 11:24 AM
0

Straight men and straight women have the same overall success dating by definition.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/25 12:54 PM
–

Got it. So you’re just here to complain about women having preferences then?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/25 03:13 AM
–

I don’t think that’s true at all. Looks are very subjective but if we’re going by body weight or whatever I’ve seen it both ways plenty. And men don’t have to worry about pregnancy weight. Also, the way some posters talk about leagues presupposes the same physical things are attractive to straight men and straight women. Which is bullshit, or else most men would want chicks with dicks. Because hey, it’s the exact same body part the guy has so he can expect the same from a woman in his “league.”
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/25 03:11 AM
–

Unattractive people also tend to date unattractive people. But I do see so called “out of league” relationships from time to time in both directions.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/25 09:51 PM
–

Do you think looks “are the only thing that matters” to men? Why or why not?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/25 09:49 PM
–

Tell it to that mid/fat guys getting laid. If you touch grass they’re not an uncommon sight.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/25 08:42 PM
–

There is no shortage of average to attractive young guys (by typical physical standards) who simply lack confidence and don’t pull as much (or even at all) as say, a chill chubby dude with rizz. I’ve seen it a lot. Looks are just one thing that matters.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/25 08:33 PM
2

Niceness/morality can absolutely go hand in hand with personal strength. It is about setting standards. And it is a personality trait. It’s something that is perceived by oneself and others. It’s something you can cultivate or let rot.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/25 02:41 AM
1

They don’t care about what others think so much they spend their time on Reddit telling other dudes how little they care!
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/25 05:26 AM
0

The world doesn’t need anyone who is totally self sufficient and cut off because what does such a (theoretical) person do to benefit the world? The world and the sigma would be totally indifferent to each other, just as the sigmas would be indifferent to each other rather than creating memes and shitposts for one another. Of course, these mythical creatures don’t really exist and the ones who call themselves sigma are the thirstiest of all.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/25 12:13 AM
2

Where are you getting this from? Everything I’ve seen suggests women are increasingly likelier to want to stay single than men, and that’s why men are complaining. I’ll go on a limb and say men are basically the same, women are basically the same, expectations have gone up but probably more for women. And that’s good because there are plenty of shitty guys that aren’t relationship material.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/25 07:19 PM
4

Why engage with troll posts like this? Yeah, bud, all the women want you and weren’t just being nice when they smiled.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/25 05:18 PM
1

I don’t know what your basis for saying they “go silent” is so I’ll just reply assuming without conceding the premise of your question. A huge percent of women have experienced sexual or domestic violence and a small percent of them have ever made false accusations.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/25 02:10 AM
-2

Not only is it met with hostility, but many of the same types who love to talk about innovation and entrepreneurship in a crypto bubble can’t possibly be arsed to suggest men challenge themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/25 06:55 AM
–

Can the Perceived Ruthlessness of Modern Dating Be Explained as the Malaise of a Dying Civilization No Longer Sustained by a Set of Moral Principles? No.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/25 06:51 AM
–

You haven’t nearly justified why you should oppose women’s rights, so it’s not on everyone else to have the burden of proving you wrong. For example, you take as a given that relationship quantity is more important than quality. Why is that? Maybe it’s better to be on your own for longer than in a loveless marriage with bad pre-sexual revolution sex. That freedom might make you happier than you realize. You are taking it for granted that it’s worthless, and that there aren’t ways average men can…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/25 06:47 AM
1

If you replicate the crimes of John Wayne Gacy you’ll know she’s into you when she sticks around, boys. Are you really so obtuse you can’t pick up the signs a woman likes you without this bullshit? Or can’t ask her out?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/25 03:15 AM
1

What stage or venue are you talking about, exactly? Most couples don’t meet in a bar that I’ve seen.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/25 11:02 PM
5

How many guys watch porn where the girl is presented as a stepmom/stepsister or worse? For that matter, how many guys who complain about high “n counts” watch porn where, not only has the performer obviously has had sex with dozens if not hundreds of men, but the character themselves is presented as off-the-charts promiscuous? Presenting the fantasy as what people really want is as silly as saying if you like Game of Thrones you want to live in Westeros.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/25 09:19 PM
1

It’s a handful of young and vulnerable women that Tate targets who are victims to his predatory behavior. Then he becomes their pimp or whatever. And it’s his whole job as a scammer to do that so he spends most of his time on it.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/25 09:11 PM
1

What exactly do we know from data? Lower rates of XYZ can mean a bunch of things. And of course if we’re playing the stats game men kill a bunch more women than vice versa. If you’re going to pull out the stats be prepared for the ones that are less flattering to men, as well. But anecdotes, especially a TV show, are not data.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/25 08:15 PM
1

Alleged man here. I’ve had women I know comment on my RBF sometimes as part of longer conversation and it’s not necessarily annoying because it doesn’t happen all the time and they actually are signaling they care about how I’m feeling. Yeah if a random unknown woman yelled it at me from a construction site (or whatever the feminine coded version of that is) it would be annoying. Especially if it happened all the time.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/25 07:13 PM
2

Yeah, I think I agree with this. The only non-silly purpose of discussing “leagues” is to say what pairings make a match on average. If a guy can’t match with a type of single mom living at home in general, she’s out of his league by definition. Just like she’d probably be way less likely to pursue a relationship with a man who looked exactly like her, genitals and secondary sex characteristics and all, right? Even though they look exactly the same in this hypothetical you can’t call em a match.…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/25 06:05 PM
1

Solutions don’t always include a drastic change in appearance so you can end up with a Sydney Sweeney lookalike. What are the guy’s standards. Is he expecting someone totally unlike himself if we’re talking in terms of leagues? If so, he should realize he can’t expecting someone like that to be attracted to him would be like some “below his standards” woman expecting him to reciprocate. There are also a lot of things to do besides dating apps. Have the rare few who are “too ugly” tried some kind…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/25 08:23 PM
1

Yes, one can be not getting laid and still not embrace a loser mindset. Many times there are solutions. Even if not, having sex isn’t the only way to get joy out of life.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/25 03:16 PM
1

An excellent straw man you’ve erected. I never claim these traits aren’t generally considered less attractive. Some of them apply to me to some extent. I just don’t throw myself a pity party over it.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/25 03:13 PM
1

If they’re not online calling themselves an incel they’re not part of the subculture.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/25 12:23 PM
1

In the real world I see plenty of short men or disabled men or broke men in relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/25 12:12 PM
–

If a generation goes down from 100 million to 50 million that’s plenty of options. And the same thing reducing the total number of potential partners reduces potential romantic competitors.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/25 12:07 PM
3

It seems implicit to me. But okay, if it’s not implied then your claim is pointless because the incels aren’t in the same position to do harm, it has nothing to do with them being inherently less dangerous as individuals.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/25 01:00 AM
5

You’re sort of assuming the guys women choose not to have relationships with would be better behaved than the ones that are picked if they themselves ended up in those relationships. That’s like saying most workplace violence is by coworkers instead of job applicants that got rejected. Doesn’t prove that the ones who got turned down are safer. In many cases they had so many red flags you’d never trust them to behave themselves in the first place.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/25 12:53 AM
0

Yeah, how could I, a person not living under a rock for a decade, possibly associate incels (as a personal identity) with shit like Elliott Rogder who wrote a whole manifesto about not being able to have sex with women? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2014_Isla_Vista_killings#On_social_media Real big mystery.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/25 12:22 AM
2

It’s kind of a two way street. They (talking about self identified men of the incel subculture rather than men who just aren’t having sex for whatever reason) should also have compassion for women who tend to get blamed and sometimes killed by incels. Also, and this is important, tough love is better than promoting messages of self pity to the dudes who aren’t malicious. Just making a whole identity out of not getting laid is self-sabotaging at best. I can’t call it anything other than loser beh…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/25 11:42 PM
-1

They’re losers because of their mindsets, which includes telling themselves in obsessive detail what losers they are.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/25 10:42 PM
28

People don’t subscribe to the ideology because evo-psych convinced them. They subscribe to the evo-psych theories to support the ideology they are drawn to. So what I am debating here is the concession that they “believe” evo-psych, for all its flaws, in any meaningful sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/25 04:06 PM
1

Few strongly want to stay single. They just prefer it to a bad relationship or getting into a relationship just because. As anyone fucking should.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/25 04:00 PM
-1

That’s funny, I’m talking about why it’s not class consciousness (billionaires being down to fuck with it is another sign) and you appeared to be disputing my original comment and saying it is class consciousness.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/25 03:29 AM
2

Class consciousness for good reason entails class struggle. (Usually not Marxist revolution but definitely stuff like labor activism, strikes, etc.) Where is the actual class struggle in the redpill? Looks like a lot of shitposting and whinging to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/25 03:11 AM
4

Lower birth rates and not settling for bad relationships just because of social norms from feudal times is good actually.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/25 02:21 AM
5

I saw the title and thought yeah, red pill is largely for men who basically don’t understand class consciousness.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/25 02:12 AM
1

If you don’t see it in female friendships you probably don’t know a wide variety of women.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/25 09:59 PM
1

The only people complaining about men (or people they label as men) dressing revealing/feminine being supposedly predatory are the current conservative Gender Police in power in the USA. No one else cares.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/25 09:48 PM
2

If Jack doesn’t have a hideous personality, I find it highly unlikely that a fit man with a friend network who has his shit together can’t find non-obese women who will date him. The OP implicitly seems to lament one of two things: Jack is not in the “top 10 percent” (however you define that) himself and wants someone who is. That may be a challenge but that’s life. Life’s not fair. But if he really wanted to make it about fairness he’d resign himself to dating at his “power level” rather than a…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/25 09:36 PM
0

The short answer? Comforting losers on the internet is more lucrative than helping them to stop acting like losers. There are a lot of losers (by which I mean, self-pitying mindsets around life and dating). They seek out emotional comfort.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/25 07:08 PM
2

I’m saying he’d probably find someone at his “level.” It’s not rare unless he’s got higher standards for her than himself. Don’t worry, I’m saying it calmly.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/25 06:20 PM
1

The only statistic I saw was obesity in 70 percent of US adults, I.e. men and women. Nothing about that tells us this hypothetical guy we made up can’t date a woman on his percentile of the “objective” attractiveness scale.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/25 05:07 PM
2

He should learn to meet people not on dating apps.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/25 04:40 PM
4

You’re right, it’s a smaller percentage of the population for men OR women. And women are also less likely to want to date the heftier fellas. The fitness dudes and dudettes will still find each other, so it shoots a big fucking hole in the idea Jack can’t find someone “objectively” as hot as he is. If the complaint is he can’t get with a model, I think the answer is he’s not a model either and cry me a fucking river.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/25 04:39 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter