TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

CookieMan0 Archive

View 1 post and 185 comments by CookieMan0 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
6

CookieMan0/r/seduction07/04/11 04:54 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
6

That's the worst advice, especially for people without much sense of identity.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/18 03:48 AM
14

Having a term to describe behavior has nothing to do with agreeing or rejecting data from a study about wolf behavior lol. You borrow the entire concept from the study, never mind the term. You're applying bad science about wolves to humans, adding another layer of faux science. BP isn't scientific, and I think you'd struggle to find anyone that argues it is, but RP is so full of pseudoscientific bullshit (see: alpha male) which it represents as truth that it's hard to take seriously.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/18 01:00 PM
38

Will most bluepillers always keep rejecting hard scientific evidence? Will most RPers always reject science? The entire "alpha male" term comes from an inaccurate study of wolf behavior in the 20th century, and the study has been debunked several times since.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/18 12:45 PM
1

RP is an attempt by low-value males to methodize the behavior of high-value males. Some of it may be true in theory, but execution by its believers (mostly the former category) is the real hurdle, which basically no RPers actually manage.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/18 12:31 AM
8

Hell no. I already find it hard to tolerate most 18-22yo women, I certainly wouldn't ditch a lifelong spouse for what would likely amount to a mediocre hookup.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/18 10:48 PM
2

Did you get the job OP?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/18 12:53 AM
2

Pretty accurate. It's about being esteemed within your social circle, whether or not your social circle is representative of society at large.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/18 11:45 PM
5

Yeah, are we done with this purge week shit? It reads like all the saltiness of deep tumblr and /b/ poured into a shitty pie crust and then baked too long.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/18 01:19 AM
1

Maybe I'm secretly a Chad, or a burgeoning one. Could use that in my line of work.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/18 11:17 PM
3

As strange as this post is, you're right, they should never stop asking women out. I strangely get high off being rejected, I'm guessing some other guys do too.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/18 10:21 PM
2

Yes. Ultimately decided that it wasn't worth being hung up on attraction when I valued those interpersonal relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/18 08:51 PM
17

Reddit users make the critical mistake of acting like social media is a platform for free speech, where they are the customers. We are the product reddit sells to advertisers, and what reddit is doing is making itself more appealing to advertisers. You're naive if you think quarantining is motivated by anything other than cash.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/18 12:02 AM
3

Yup. Some people need to accept rejection better and respect what it means.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/18 02:10 AM
3

https://newsok.com/article/5605564/boy-accused-in-luther-high-school-stabbing-had-tried-to-start-relationship-with-victim
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/18 02:02 AM
3

Some people are stupid.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/18 07:54 PM
2

ACKSHUALLY, that’s not most feminists! That’s the loud and awful ones! The silent majority, the REAL feminists, would never say that sort of thing! Those assholes are just a vocal minority!” No True Scotsman (?)
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/18 05:26 PM
2

And RP is what (some of) BP considers the status quo. As for how I define BP... that's kinda nebulous, considering it seems to be a term used only here as direct opposition to RP. I'd consider it akin to feminism in that it's a blanket label for a vast group of ideologies and is for the most part politico-philosophically liberal. Because I don't consider BP to be a definable group, simply "believing" or "agreeing" with it is impossible, just like it's impossible to call oneself a feminist and ha…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/18 05:09 PM
11

I already knew not to trust BP, and now I know that RP justifies its worldview so poorly, I know to ignore its advice as well and figure things out for myself as I've always done.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/18 03:49 PM
6

While this does seem to be all anecdotal evidence, I wouldn't be surprised if it was indeed a trend. I think anyone obsessed with having a young girl by their side at all times has issues and probably hasn't matured since the age of 20 anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/18 11:01 PM
1

Most "gendered insights" are actually human insights; we're all attracted to confidence and people who enjoy life, we all want the best partner we can get, and we all date and select for different traits at 30 than what we did at 20. For every claim TRP makes about women, we find men doing exactly the same. Finally someone who gets it. There is so much R/BP attribute to gender that's just a plain human trait, sometimes partially repressed in the "observing" party that fails to see it in themselv…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/18 01:06 PM
1

Would post smartass photoshop of the above's face on Captain America if I had the time.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/18 01:28 PM
1

???
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/18 01:32 AM
2

I think a lot of them fall into the former. It's envy. I say that as someone who used to experience the emotion, before I untied my self worth from what women think of me.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/18 03:48 AM
8

Good summary. Social circles are reliable; expecting cold approaches is a gamble, a higher risk for equal or lesser reward.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/18 12:21 AM
1

attempting Already answered in the above comment.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/18 01:07 PM
3

heuhehuuehueuheuheuheuehue I get what you're doing, but I want to be with someone at least attempting to reach their potential as a person. Stagnance is a no go.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/18 03:28 AM
5

I'm in a similar situation. Unsatisfied with her for the same reasons. She finally got a job, and I supported her through the teething stage, but she's avoiding growth as a person when faced with the challenge of full-time employment. We're getting distant and I think it's pretty much over.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/18 07:19 PM
2

If it's obvious he's trying to pick her up, then yeah. If it's plain conversation, then not really.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/18 12:19 AM
3

Not necessarily. Putting on a niche look will draw more attention from others part of said niche.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/18 10:24 PM
6

I think it'll be a little scary if anything. If a private website can profile people with accuracy based on their social media activity, then that's kinda creepy.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/18 02:28 PM
12

I seriously hope you're joking. Trying to "protect" children from learning experiences backfires without fail.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/18 03:39 AM
1

Anyone who treats men like dogs and sex like a Milk Bone has a really fucked up worldview, and I don't want to associate with them, as a friend or a sexual partner. Fortunately, this is not something I have encountered in my personal life.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/18 01:41 AM
1

As a guy if someone thought I was a prostitute (either gay or straight) I would probably be flattered that someone thought I was attractive enough that people would pay me for sex or company. I would too, but as men in western society, we are the suitors, not the sought. Women are the sought, and those tasked with selecting from partners. Pickiness and being attractiveness correlate, and though their relationship is not direct, people act as if it is so. A woman who selects many men is viewed by…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/18 11:21 PM
1

As a guy if someone thought I was a prostitute (either gay or straight) I would probably be flattered that someone thought I was attractive enough that people would pay me for sex or company. I would too, but as men in western society, we are the suitors, not the sought. Women are the sought, and those tasked with selecting from partners. Pickiness and being attractiveness correlate, and though their relationship is not direct, people act as if it is so. A woman who selects many men is viewed by…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/18 11:04 PM
1

Why is it not the right thread to discuss it? Changing someone's view does not require an adoption of the opposite position; it is possible to incorporate new ideas into an existing viewpoint, altering it.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/18 07:08 PM
4

And that's a generalization that can be extended to women, using different examples.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/18 06:59 PM
16

I should have brought my skis for this slippery slope.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/18 05:59 PM
7

He didn't bring the wine, and didn't care that he didn't hold up his end of the bargain. Freeloader got no meal out of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/18 10:04 PM
1

Whether or not you have Down Syndrome. Facial features are one of the traits affected.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/18 03:09 AM
1

See a mirror.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/18 12:35 AM
1

Yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/18 06:56 AM
3

Not when the feeling is mutual.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/18 01:17 AM
1

Nobody's going to mention that people tend to covet things that they are denied?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/17 09:08 PM
1

Yeah, though they can vary from person to person. Everyone expresses (or hides) interest in others in different ways, though there are some methods that are common to a large number of people.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/17 01:18 AM
5

many men are losers who can't offer much to women Many women are also not mentally developed enough for a serious relationship. "Many" is too nonspecific for your point to carry any weight, even if true.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/17 06:09 AM
2

No, both sexes can be verbally abusive and physically violent. Don't try to slant the truth.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/17 11:15 PM
1

"Lived experiences" has another name in the legal world. It's called anecdotal evidence.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/16 06:03 AM
1

These are the opinions men have Men, as in all men? Most men? Some men? Enough men to be statistically relevant? A couple men?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/16 02:03 AM
4

It's a team sport, communication is paramount.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/16 08:03 PM
5

Guys go into sex with the intention of getting off. Partially true. Many also go into sex with the intention of getting their partner off.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/16 07:56 PM
1

Mostly true. The person I listed is an example of what you said.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/16 01:02 PM
0

I still don't think an attractive 5'5" would have a problem with at least half of women liking him! Short guys can still get plenty of female attention. See: younger Richard Hammond.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/16 05:01 AM
0

What is it about marriage that's attractive, might I ask?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/16 04:59 PM
0

does money matter when you marry a woman? Slooooooooooow down here. You're first assuming that every guy's out for marriage. Now, I am speaking from a position of my own opinion, but marriage today is a stupid idea. As much fun as the whole reception sounds to me, the legal ramifications of being married (and divorcing) are too much of a minefield. To answer your actual question? mrcs84usn put it best. If she's not a financial burden, then she's making enough money. Affluence is almost aways goi…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/16 04:14 PM
3

Rape and rape victims aren't taken seriously By whom?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/16 07:07 PM
4

Where do you live? A nunnery?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/16 06:42 PM
4

OP, have you literally never met a woman who has had casual sex for pleasure?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/16 06:27 PM
3

Why would it be? It's mediocre erotica.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/16 05:15 PM
2

His family and friends had an escape set up for him, he just chose not to take it.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/16 03:16 PM
1

But what does that have to do with a bad wife?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/16 02:28 PM
1

Er, didn't Socrates elect to drink the hemlock?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/16 03:31 AM
1

People with agendas pushed it, Yes. it's unclear whether the current backlash is also just people with agendas pushing narratives. It's rather clear to me. There are some people who are pushing narratives with ideals that oppose that of PCness, but there are those, such as myself, that aren't okay with the lack of principle behind political correctness. They aim to do good without any clear definition of what is good.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/16 10:31 PM
2

To what are you referring?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/16 03:28 PM
5

I dislike excessive political correctness. There's being polite, and then there's being condescending. It tends to fall into the latter. One of the biggest culprits is the term people of color, which is not only a rephrasing of colored people (which is racist as fuck), but also serves to categorize people by how they look, which strikes me as the opposite of what's intended.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/16 12:39 AM
2

I... honestly don't like long hair much at all. I just don't find people with it attractive all that often. Short hair, ponytails, pixie cuts... that's where it's at.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/16 04:57 AM
5

Men don't have genitals bolted to their chests. The breast is not a genital. It's for feeding kids, not producing them.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/16 09:10 AM
1

You had had relationships and sex in the past. Which were what concluded my incel period. No interpersonal activity before it. Ooooh, let me guess, you probably have some sort of STEM degree, right? Do tell me what language is, please. I love to hear the crazy things you guys come up with. I might acknowledge this if you could stop acting like a child. But the rest of your post only gets worse, so I'm going to pretend you aren't acting like someone half your age.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/16 12:05 AM
1

You were a guy with philosophical issues concerning the nature of love, who swore off relationships (but could have them), sex (but could have it) and masturbation. Incorrect. I haven't any clue where you got that from— can you quote my comments that gave you that idea? Here, the word incel is used to talk about people who cannot have sex or relationships. See my original comment in this thread and check for any discrepancy between these ideas. Rage about it all you want, but that's just how it …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/16 11:48 PM
1

Let's check the Wikipedia definition: In a wider sense, it is commonly understood to only mean abstinence from sexual activity.[1][5]
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/16 11:40 PM
1

Prescriptivism is for losers. Especially when it's not even a goal unto itself, but just a means for you to put down a group you don't like. Put down a group I was a part of and feel sympathy for? For what motive? Words don't have equal meanings between people. If I were to use they're/their/there interchangeably, I'd be wrong. Language isn't objective, as it does evolve through how it's used, but it's not subjective either. It needs to be agreed upon, and the chosen use of the abbreviation ince…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/16 10:55 PM
1

Close. Either the common definition is a misnomer, or the people who claim the label are actually celibate.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/16 05:49 PM
1

Dude, just because you've come up with one more bullshit reason why "incel doesn't exist" people aren't going to stop using the word. Language is a convention, so shut up. Never said it didn't exist. I said it had some odd technicalities. Language is often misused, with incorrect uses catching on in the mainstream.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/16 04:08 PM
-1

Then they're not celibate. It just means they aren't getting laid, and should stop calling themselves celibate.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/16 09:04 AM
3

Entirely fair. This is a place to put ideas to the test.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/16 08:52 AM
-2

Since when do incels not masturbate? It's an abbreviation of "involuntary celibate". Celibacy means no sexual activity whatsoever, so masturbation is out. It's a small misnomer, as masturbation is technically an option, but it has been passed over in favor of contact with a real person.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/16 08:49 AM
2

Lack of sex? Oh, sure, you can rub one out. Read: celibate. As in, opted out of jerking in because it's a hollow experience. But loneliness? Insecurity? Feeling ugly? The fear that you're going to die alone and no one will care? Those can and do fuck people up. I experienced those. Much of that period overlapped with a period of depression over a serious mental diagnosis, that later turned out to be false. I was totally sure that I would be lonely for life. It did fuck me up, and I still haven't…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/16 06:55 AM
2

In your case, I doubt you were seriously afraid you would never have sex or feel loved again. The former, yes. The latter I was never sure about in the first place. Both questions have now been answered for me, but they weren't answered without considerable effort on my part.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/16 06:47 AM
1

I was there. I didn't have any really close friends for most of that period.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/16 05:39 AM
11

I was a celibate for about three years, and all I have to say is that if your life doesn't revolved around an obsession with sex, you quickly learn that life is not only not about sex, but that sex simply isn't important. It's nice, yes, but far from a necessity. If you're suicidal and depressed about not getting any, then you have bigger problems, such as those with your own perceived value as a human being.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/16 04:29 AM
3

You're kind of implying that the plot is a reason that people watch porn. The stated example is more one of being bluntly offered sex, a common fantasy, as men are commonly considered the go-getters. Taking the effort out of getting laid sounds like a plus to most guys.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/16 06:39 AM
1

Yeah I think so. RP folks say that RP is about sex and self-improvement, but if you follow their links far enough, you see that the sexual strategy goes hand in hand with political, religious, or cultural beliefs about gender. Only if you feel like following the train that far. Just because the bus on which I rode home in middle school ended up in Boulder didn't mean I had to ride it there. There's a fair point in saying that RP is a tool, and morality of its use is up to those who possess it. A…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/16 05:46 AM
3

As a dude, I get where you're coming from. But do try to remember that feminism was a response to some pretty harsh conditions women endured for a long time. Oh, for sure. Suffragettes went through some sick shit to get legal recognition, and I've seen some of the slimy propaganda against them from their era. Earlier feminism was important too, but modern "feminism" means nothing because it's a snake with a hundred heads. A Swiss Army knife, if you will; a motley collection of mediocre tools tha…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/16 07:50 AM
2

No. Its not hard for attractive men to figure out when women are interested in them. Its hard for non-hot men to figure out when women are interested in them, because women are never interested in them. Again, you're using the minority case as a standard for all men. That's not what we have been talking about at any point. growing up with these guys I learned real quick how women are when they are attracted to a guy, and how clear they make they attraction be known to the chad. So, anecdotal evi…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/16 07:43 AM
2

What suble clues? Women don't give subtle clues at all. When a guy feels like a girl is attracted by reading her clues, he's mostly likely wrong. Studies show that men see sexual interest from women where there is none. So, you're saying it's hard for guys to figure out when women are interested with any accuracy? Women when they are attracted to a guy make it quite clear by telling they want to bang, Got a source for this? Anything other than generalizations or anecdotal evidence to support thi…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/16 07:27 AM
6

One coherent set of ideas isn't in direct competition with 15 different sets of ideas. Some conventional advice agrees with RP; some conventional advice disagrees with RP; some conventional advice doesn't respond directly to RP. That make any sense? I don't agree that RP is not competing with conventional advice. It is directly at odds with a lot of conventional wisdom, but it is harder to tune in to because it's not mainstream, and must be sought out. RP is a bad answer. BP is no answer. And I'…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/16 07:21 AM
1

I might have been tempted to believe that all women are like my ex-girlfriend and that I just needed to be more alpha. But they aren't and I didn't. But at that time, when I was low, I could have felt justified believing that all women are out to fuck me if I don't fuck them first. I could have been cynical and delusional, but I didn't. So, you say that RP subscribes to Thomas Hobbes' belief that we, as humans, are selfish creatures? As in, you are saying that RP emphasizes focus on the self due…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/16 07:05 AM
2

When women are sexually attracted to a guy they make a move ont the guy, with actions or with words. Someone with Autism won't understand any subtle cues. Hell, vocal cues fly over the head of plenty of guys. You're also insinuating that these moves are often explicit and straightforward, when they rarely are. Even a retard can figure out when a woman is into him. Simply untrue.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/16 06:56 AM
6

mostly because feminist thought was never really designed to address men's complaints about dating. Feminist thought wasn't designed, though. There is so much that calls itself feminism that directly opposes other forms of feminism that it's not even meaningful to call oneself a feminist any more. RP is not actually competing with conventional advice Is it not? It gives better guidance than the static-laden signal of all the other sources of advice. It's unreasonable to think that feminism could…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/16 06:48 AM
1

Doesn't matter. Even people with high-functioning autism require a miracle to get laid. Those on the low-functioning end of the spectrum can give up on ever having sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/16 06:38 AM
1

It simply provides a justification for built-up grievances based on generalizations about women that are not only false; they are intentionally non-falsifiable. What is, in your words, this justification?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/16 06:19 AM
4

My guess is that conventional advice for you was an amalgamation of different things that many different people (feminists, non-feminists, your dad, movies, TV shows) told you over your life. So, we're supposed to figure out interactions with the opposite sex work when we're being given advice by multiple conflicting ideas, and come out with fully formed, effective abilities? That's like trying to learn Jiu Jitsu, Kung Fu, kickboxing, and karate all at once, with a different instructor every fiv…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/16 06:18 AM
2

What does social awareness and intelligence has to do with getting laid as a guy? Tell me how many Autistic men are out there getting laid all the time and you've found your answer.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/16 06:09 AM
2

Your post reads like borderline /r/whiterights material.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/15 12:51 AM
1

when women are so clearly given a free pass on all these criteria. Women are more selective with dating than men are. This is just a fact. It's not fair, but I don't think effort to change it will be rewarded. Plenty of women out there who would put a lot less effort into being dateable, and no one would still ever date to call them "undeatable" because they are women, or because they would never hold such expectations of women. Yes, it's not a fair double standard, but I wouldn't expect it to c…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/15 11:43 PM
7

The hostile reaction to 'sorry dude, you're just not that hot' is over-blown by a long shot. Yes. This is something that always bugged me with rejection, I was almost never given a no, but given the runaround. The majority of guys, even those who have weak self-esteem, would prefer being told a simple no, not interested instead of being led on. And if they react poorly? Then they were the narcissistic category in the first place, so fuck those guys.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/15 04:57 PM
2

Yup. The latter is pretty close to me. It took me years to figure out that making dating the primary focus of my life is counterproductive. Nobody wants a boring relationship based around being sweet to their partner, everyone wants to experience new things with someone whose company they enjoy.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/15 04:52 PM
3

Good way to put it. It's a cruel defense mechanism to use in avoiding the confrontation of having to just say, "not interested."
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/15 04:50 PM
11

most Nice Guys don't have the ability to evaluate that behavior objectively. Hence why we would need a third party to evaluate self perception versus actions. Nice Guys™ versus "nice guys", as in the manipulative narcissists versus the shy guys who don't understand how to relate to the opposite sex. They are not one and the same, though their actions can appear similar at times. I'd guess that it's a small portion (maybe 10-20%), but because they tend to have a shotgun approach and will complain…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/15 05:24 AM
8

I have never seen or heard of this phenomenon before I heard of TBP and neither have any of my bluepill friends. Well, I think the term is a misnomer anyway. What they seem to tag as a "nice guy" is a self-centered, manipulative person who matches the description of a narcissist, and narcissists are only about one percent of the population.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/15 05:15 AM
20

However, Nice Guys™ are a completely different breed. These are the kinds of guys that will do things for you, unrequested (and often not wanted), and then be upset or enraged that you aren't falling over yourself to thank them for it. Do we have any information on what proportion of men are like this? It would determine whether this is a legitimate problem or a boogeyman of modern feminism.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/15 04:46 AM
9

There's little doubt that rapey men do more damage in the world than rapey women. Can you explain your reasoning behind this?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/15 10:39 PM
3

but I do find an interesting correlation between people who claim this, and people who cry "reverse racism" So, you're insinuating that AbrasiveAsshole is a white supremacist with the intention of maintaining plausible deniability when called out?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/15 04:34 PM
1

I believe men are evolutionary driven to find the highest value woman. I believe both biology and environment have equated highest value with physical attractiveness. Now, do you believe that physical attractiveness is a societally determined value, or an instinctually determined value? But how we conclude what is attractive is heavily influenced by the environment. It sounds to me like you're equivocating society and environment, or trying to fit one under the other, when these are two distinct…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/15 09:59 PM
1

Your point makes no sense whatsoever.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/15 09:32 PM
2

Yes, I believe men also seek high value women. Do you believe a high value woman is defined solely by environment and not by any innate characteristics, part of the primal area of a man's brain?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/15 02:14 AM
3

as you RP-ers call it, Do not ascribe ideologies to me. I flair grey because I don't believe in coloring an incomplete, developing set of personal beliefs. What determines a high value mate often times is influenced by the environment. Do you believe that men also seek high value mates?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/15 01:58 AM
7

If masculine men are idealized by society, surely a lot of women would then prefer masculine men. That's falling a bit short, you're attributing attraction to masculinity as entirely a nurtured trait, when it's definitely a biologically influenced trait.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/15 10:15 PM
1

I think it should be their choice, and regarding their choices: que sera sera.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/15 05:49 PM
1

Valeria Solanas is a rather crazy individual.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/15 09:19 PM
2

What's it matter if you're a good person if how you look shuts you out beforehand?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/15 05:21 AM
1

Because marriage rates are dropping nationwide. If you're trying to make a point about families, you need to mention that you're specifically referring to families, sainted of generalizing.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/15 03:50 PM
1

Then I suggest you qualify your statement with "promiscuity in marriage is damaging to society", rather than making unfitting blanket statements.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/15 03:41 PM
1

Tasty. Also, it seems people here don't know that it's another way of asking for a source.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/15 03:38 PM
1

Nope. If you are saying that it breaks down families, then include that as a clause in your comment. Otherwise, you're making a false generalization.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/15 03:36 PM
4

Already saw that, and in no way does it suggest that promiscuity in itself damages society.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/15 12:06 AM
1

Overall, I support MRAs more than feminism, which has lost its way with the third wave. TRP has some good points, but it's not for me.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/15 10:57 PM
2

Because they believe there is heavy overlap in the two groups, and they hate that lots of subject matter MRAs care about is statistically backed, unlike their 77%, their 1-in-3, or the manspreading nonsense.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/15 10:31 PM
3

And before you say it: it doesn't matter that you think those men are stupid for having that preference. I wasn't going to say that. It's a statistically valid reason for men who prefer monogamous relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/15 10:09 PM
4

Promiscuity is damaging to society Back this up.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/15 09:08 PM
2

To clarify, do you mean does the amount of sex strangers have with others impact me, or does the amount of sex a potential partner have with others impact me? If the former, of course not. People can do as they please with their lives. If the latter, yes. The latter was, as shown in a statistic linked elsewhere, was more likely to be unhappy with a marriage, but there are exceptions. I'm also curious what reasons, aside from more cock, are available to explain this phenomenon. Another point of c…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/15 08:03 PM
2

Interesting. What reasons can we find for that?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/15 07:53 PM
4

The ability of most twenty-something women to fuck at will in their twenties as described in the OP. It simplifies it a bit, but my point stands.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/15 07:52 PM
6

Answer me this: Does the amount of sex people you've never met have an impact on you? If a woman you're dating has had a lot of safe sex in her past, and is no worse off for it, what is the problem? The only one I can see is jealousy.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/15 07:48 PM
-2

sauce
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/15 04:37 PM
3

Life isn't fair. I don't mind that women have that particular advantage. Society will never be entirely fair to men/women.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/15 04:37 PM
6

Women who ride the CC in their teens/twenties and later become post wall cat hoarders is the very definition of karma. Wait, so promiscuity in youth is grounds for being single later in life? In no way is having a lot of sex an inherently bad thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/15 04:09 PM
3

I remember a thread a few days ago where men were professing that they could never be emotionally vulnerable in front of a woman ever. That sounds like they're proudly holding one of the aspects that folks like MRM directly want to combat. Odd.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/15 01:57 PM
2

Some good points but a lot of outrage over petty things, for instance taking pics of things that address men or women alone etc. Which leads to a giant circel-jerk thread were everyone ends up feeling outraged. That sounds awfully familiar to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/15 01:56 PM
3

I've a few different things to say about this. 1) That's not an ideology. That's a worldview. 2) That sounds a lot like the "fat activist movement." A group of entitled women who spew hatred for healthy people and say that heterosexual males have been brainwashed into thinking that "skinny" (healthy) people are attractive. This is not a gendered problem as your comment would imply. 3) It also sounds like narcissism. You forgot a mix of jealousy and a lack of introspection as traits to add. 4) I …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/15 03:34 AM
2

Incel ideology And this is, in your own words, what?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/15 10:17 PM
1

Both my parents graduated college. Mother's currently a project manager for Medtronic, and my dad's a writer as well as a graphic designer for a hospital. They're divorced, though. As for me, I'm so much of a fencesitter that the fence post is about three feet up my ass.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/15 02:14 PM
2

Holy shit what. I don't even get the point of this.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/15 02:08 PM
1

Sometimes they have a slutwalk ... a what?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/15 01:46 AM
2

Very well stated. I thought it was utterly nonsense when people able up about that shirt, doubly so because the shirt was made by a woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/15 01:44 AM
3

Hooooly shit, that link has a lot of information.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/15 01:40 AM
1

Well stated. The problem is that the moderates are shouted down by the radicals, and neither can point to the other and cast them out. There is no differentiation. When someone says, "I'm a Christian," you don't know if they're the evangelical or the once-a-year churchgoer.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/15 01:39 AM
1

the people that posted her home address and personal phone number also fucked up. Source? I never saw any evidence of doxxing, only allegations.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/15 05:01 AM
4

Good post. Also, given the male majority in online communities likely to induce shitslinging, there's going to be a markedly skewed difference in how angry people attack others based on the sex of the person they're trying to upset.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/15 04:27 AM
0

but I think most can acknowledge that women can get much shittier treatment than men on the internet. On the internet, you are faceless until you show otherwise. You are genuinely equal with the other anonymous users. 4chan put it succinctly, if crudely.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/15 04:21 AM
3

This is a good tracker, but is there a way to parse the results to include exclusively sex/gender discrimination and cases in which the plaintiff was denied compensation?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/15 10:14 PM
2

Odds are it will, but I'm not doing it to be "gotcha". I want something to back what I believe.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/15 10:07 PM
9

I quite like what Karen Straughan has to say. She often puts into words concepts that I struggle to communicate myself.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/15 09:58 PM
7

Right, but they typically do have evidence when they bring up these charges. Your use of typically implies evidence backing this claim. Can you cite a source or statistic in favor of this? Note: I'm not trying to just be contrarian. I too believe that what you said is right, but I'd like hard evidence to back up your/my beliefs.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/15 09:56 PM
1

You asked for an example of helping someone through force and without force and I provided one. Well, "helping through force" is one way to put it, but is more commonly known as theft or mugging. I don't disagree with that, but this is about the expectation, not the result. Which would you consider the expectation? The dealer helping to break one's dependence, or to reinforce it? I believe the latter is more of the expectation.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/15 07:36 PM
1

If you walk up to me with a gun and tell me to give you money or you'll kill me, then the ends may be similar, but the situation was not voluntary. How does this relate to the topic at hand? If somebody got you hooked on drugs and then those drugs caused all kinds of problems I wouldn't consider it completely unreasonable to expect him to help you out of trouble, though again that is the expectation not a mandate. I think anyone who's getting you hooked on hard drugs isn't interested in your wel…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/15 03:45 PM
1

Sharing is voluntary, taxes are not voluntary. To which I preemptively replied: within reason Being physically forced to help someone is not the same as simply helping someone. Example? That really depends. I assume you have an example for this as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/15 05:39 PM
1

I'm fine with people making mistakes, just as long as they don't vote to use other people's resources to cover their mistakes. I'm fine with sharing my resources to fix someone else's mistakes within reason. Dependency upon others to fix one's mistakes is simply unacceptable. Let me see if I can summarize your beliefs: Mistakes are okay. Dependency/expectation of others to fix one's mistakes is not okay. Integrity/accountability are important, and it's better for someone to accept the consequenc…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/15 04:56 PM
1

As stated in the title? No. Have a look at /r/justneckbeardthings and see what would be considered "beta" to be acting irrationally and on instinct. Plenty of the world's finest "alpha" men are rational and cooperative. I think they're more relative to intelligence, which is a soft/abstract enough trait as to be irrelevant to this discussion.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/15 04:51 PM
1

I'm confident it wont make anybody depressed and unfulfilled! What, is it your job to tell other people how to live in an amoral topic such as this?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/15 04:47 PM
2

She is generally out to prove that she is strong and independent and thus will avoid anything that might be construed as weakness or inferiority or dependency. I've got to say... that sounds awfully familiar. Honestly, anyone who describes themselves with that term, regardless of their gender, can really be a pain in the ass. I can agree. Often, I find they like the idea of the label, without engaging in the practice. As a man, though, trying to be in relationship with those kinds of women is ju…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/15 06:10 AM
1

They're already spreading out that 18 trillion figure, thought it has been shot down a number of times and will reportedly save us 10 trillion instead.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/15 11:00 PM
3

But Sanders' numbers are better than pre-debate 2008 Obama. After the debates, there's no telling how much he will grow.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/15 08:19 PM
2

The person who works should be dependent on what is best for the relationship This does not necessarily contradict what I said. Something something work to live something something Elaborate. Is it really though? Do they really have a choice? Are you saying they don't have a choice? And in your own words, what choice is this?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/15 04:42 AM
2

Jewish people control the world. wut. They have influence, but not control. Jewish people are very smart compared the the average american. More like compared to the average person, as they hold themselves to higher educational standards than the average person.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/15 03:56 AM
3

If you see how much control Jewish people have over the world you might agree. Whoa there. No way in hell would I associate with Nazis, let alone sympathize with them as you seem to be admitting to.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/15 01:34 AM
3

Using drugs and buying drugs with the intent to use are two different actions, though. I'm not sure what point you are trying to make.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/15 01:31 AM
4

Maybe, maybe not, but I doubt the dynamic of mom slaying the dragons and dad staying home with the kids doing domestic stuff isn't going to cause strife Maybe. But who's to say who should be going out and slaying the dragon? Let whoever wants to and is capable of doing so handle the task. What is the benefit of having more people in the workforce? Basic capitalism. The cream rises to the top. Women make bad men and I don't think they like it ether It's their choice.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/15 01:05 AM
3

Can. Some also buy them legitimately with no intent for violence. Are you also saying drug use has an impact on the value of a person?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/15 01:04 AM
6

Are you equating drug use to arson/murder? The former tends to affect only oneself, the latter directly affects other people.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/15 12:40 AM
6

Can be. They can also literally be Nazis. I daresay the Nazis on /pol/ outnumber the normies.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/15 12:39 AM
5

True. But why is he so into a supposedly traditional gender role for women? Are the duties he listed inherently better for or better performed by women? I personally see no problem with women departing the housewife roles, joining the workforce, and assuming more "traditionally masculine" roles. It sounds to me like he's saying women are becoming more like men, which I can't say is a bad thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/15 12:37 AM
10

It's /pol/, which is notoriously full of ideologues and shitposting. Not the board you go to for rational discussion.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/15 12:17 AM
11

Er, you're quoting Varg Vikernes, who was imprisoned for burning down churches and committing murder. I'm not sure it's a good idea to get your values from someone like him. Edit: double post god damnit.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/15 11:49 PM
10

Er, you're quoting Varg Vikernes, who was imprisoned for burning down churches and committing murder. I'm not sure it's a good idea to get your values from someone like him.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/15 11:49 PM
6

Well, sex is a team sport.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/15 01:36 AM
1

Intelligence, creativity. Short hair, piercings, tattoos are fantastic. Slender figure.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/15 05:36 PM
2

Boooo, mine doesn't have enough belly fat.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/15 06:14 AM
1

you've been ruthlessly enigmatic. That's because the truth is not simple. I avoid generalizations. To say I understand humans would be foolish. I know enough to know how much I don't know.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/15 07:01 PM
1

No, stance is terrible for tire wear and is likely to damage your oil pan. Ask me a specific question and get an answer. Asking me if I have an opinion is useless.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/15 06:25 PM
2

It was a question, and a genuine one. All you had to do was answer. I'm trying to figure out what your stance actually is because you're being very vague about it. That's because it's a complex issue. Some women thrive in a competitive, professional environment, and some flounder. Same goes for men. What I'm arguing against, however, does, be that your view as well or not. ... what?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/15 01:37 PM
2

Though they did state beliefs that are held by some. Unless, of course, you wish to invoke No True Scotsman.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/15 05:09 AM
4

Are you actually suggesting that Women are unfit or less fit for the modern professional environment? Are you putting words in my mouth? Some women won't enjoy the lifestyle stated above. Some men won't either. Not everything's a case of black-and-white.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/15 05:07 AM
9

Nah, you'd have been spotted as a troll. The wording isn't particularly Poe-inducing.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/15 01:24 AM
1

Maybe it's not as simple as using tribalistic viewpoints. The fact is that that lifestyle is simply not fitting for some people. Not everything is for everyone.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/15 01:24 AM
10

It's because they are getting too many rights that their puny little brains simply can't handle such responsibility. The only way they can be happy is to be bossed around by some alpha bro. Never has a straw man been so blatant.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/15 12:44 AM
7

Is there a difference in practice? Does it matter if intent differs when the outcome is the same?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/15 04:22 PM
1

No it is not. There is larger supply of men looking to get laid, than there is a supply of women looking for casual sex. Men are less picky too. That does not refute what I said. The situation is still realistic. When the average woman just asks random strangers out, she is going to get better responses than the average man doing the same, without any game or personality. So, the average woman has more choices than the average guy? What does that mean with regards to what I said? I'm talking abo…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/15 01:36 AM
0

What do you mean by manipulation? Do you mean outright lying about a committed relationship or something else? By that, I mean taking advantage of basic insecurities or vulnerabilities of the human brain. The halo effect is very real. My point with that examle is simply that, people do not experience the same reality. There's no arguing that. Despite that, some realities are objectively less real than others. I'll be that guy to invoke Godwin's law by saying Hitler's perception of reality is les…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/15 01:03 AM
1

Kind of irreverent, but let's say it's a biological drive (sex). I'm assuming you mean RP. I have no qualms with RP's self-improvement philosophies, but some do use some of the techniques in RP exclusively to manipulate women for sex. The service a male model going to grocery store or going to a restaurant are greatly different from the service an overweight neckbeard receives. I could start making character projections based on those two specific examples, but I'll avoid it since I know you int…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/15 12:34 AM
1

How do you justify this belief as someone who (i assume) lives in the western world. Many of the things around us come from other people suffering. I don't call that just. But the biggest inequalities in the first world come from socioeconomic class, not gender. The graph you linked is directly related to class and not gender, which is what this sub is mostly about. Such as? We may just not see it as wrong; it may fit all of our experiences and help us reach a preferred outcome. Why is that outc…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/15 12:17 AM
2

1) Male, North America, hooligan 2) See flair. 3) Fairness, even without equality, is what I value. There are some double standards for men/women that don't need to be abolished (maternal/paternal leave), but there are some that do (domestic abuse shelters). 4) I believe every human has an equal right to the opportunity to be healthy and happy, as long as what makes them happy does not infringe upon another human's right to be happy. 5) Why is it so hard to admit what many people on your side, o…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/15 11:27 PM
10

The SJW movement will never become the majority. There are simply too many moderates who are uninterested in identity politics for it ever to shape the world in a permanent way.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/15 01:20 AM
1

I've tried rock climbing in school. I'm deathly afraid of heights. my mouth goes dry, and it takes all of my will to even try to move up the next rock.
/r/seduction25/07/12 05:57 PM
3

I'm scared of heights. If I can find time during the school year, I'll take up fencing.
/r/seduction24/07/12 10:56 PM
1

I hear Red Lucy's looking for some more hunters.
/r/seduction11/04/12 05:08 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter