TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Cotehill Archive

View 7 posts and 360 comments by Cotehill on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Fair enough. Each man goes their own way.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/24 10:03 AM
3

You’re a man. The only thing men do is grind - men become. Men grind all their life. You don’t get time off from that ever, especially when with a woman Get used to it. Didn’t your dad tell you this?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/24 10:02 PM
5

Where did you get those figures from? Please provide your sources - every other statistic shows that by 2030, over 50% of US women will be single and childless.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/24 09:59 PM
3

It’s not just that you have little chance. The problem is that you are not settling for someone less (in your view) or the 35yo+ who is looking for the “nice guy” they rejected all their lives so far. However, that doesn’t work either lol. Because they will divorce you as so. As it is financially if benefit to them, they will always be looking for “better”, will quickly get bored because they have no idea what married life is actually like. They would also prefer to take everything with you 6 fe…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/24 09:56 PM
1

Equality means equality, one law for all - works for me.
/r/MensRights02/07/24 08:14 PM
31

It’s their go to insult. All of them. Just call them leftover women, and that they need to buy a dog.
/r/MensRights01/07/24 08:23 PM
23

Consent is absolutely required. Men should carry cards with elements to be completed - date, name, address, date of birth, consent, amount of alcohol consumed, signature and whether the woman wants some kind of kink. And should audio record their sex. There is no other way to protect yourself and it may still not be enough. Happily in the UK, the police do seem to be seriously investigating accusations and there have been some high profile cases where the women have been arrested. The laws are m…
/r/MensRights28/06/24 04:32 PM
-4

Be thankful it was only a punch. But if you are aware of the game, you should have been immediately on your guard close to a bunch of teenagers. As for whether men would have surrounded women and supported her, that is up for grabs nowadays. Understand that life isn’t fair and the only person you can rely on is yourself. Ever. No use whining about others in New York, who are more than likely wimpy democrats, and you choose to be there.
/r/MensRights16/06/24 07:33 PM
1

Do you have any evidence for that claim?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/24 06:32 PM
4

Sales of toys would quadruple
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/24 06:30 PM
2

Yes. Only the few have chances at ages below 30, or only a few chances and must take them. But you still need to know your value. The average guy at 35 is still “average” and can only expect average - and they may be single moms or overweight or rather beastly looking without makeup in clear light, and their personality may be mid too. If you’re not outstanding in’s some way, you can’t expect anything other than average at any point in time. Don’t make the mistake women make - understand the lan…
/r/MensRights16/06/24 06:07 PM
1

This is the main bit these influencers get wrong. But it’s not red pill either. Marriage and SAHMs have little place in red pill beneficial aspects. SAHMs are the most likely to divorce, and the nastiest. Marriage is a patriarchal, traditional and religious mechanism. No women should be marrying because of that. No men should marry ever. Red Pill indicates clearly that 50% of marriages end in divorce, 80% by women choosing mainly that they are bored, and 80% of ongoing marriages are unhappy and …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/24 05:06 PM
10

Don’t focus on dating at your age. Get the job and expect nothing romantic - buy it if you need it and stay protected. When she and you are 35, she’ll start sniffing round you. At which point all the 23yo girls will be sniffing round you. Just maintain your athleticism, fitness and hygiene, build your career and assets, and learn the game.
/r/MensRights15/06/24 04:45 PM
0

We certainly don’t. Humans have always used their eyes to perceive their potential mates. Physical attraction has always been the first thing. Then you get to know someone. In other cases, as highlighted above, you might have no interest at all in someone but somehow you get to know each other and the attraction grows. I know that from personal experience - but I’m not daft enough to deny the usual way. It is only people who claim they are only sexually attracted to someone after having got to k…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/24 01:06 PM
1

Your defintion is completely illogical. It continues to use the very same words and relies on them to produce a defintion. It’s the same as answering “what is a woman?” should never include the term “woman” Arousal is a very specific term that has its own connotations. In a guy, it is usually associated with a hard-on, in a woman with a warming and moist vagina. In other words, some kind of physical response. Sexual attraction in and of itself is not that. It’s the equivalent of “fancying someon…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/24 12:46 PM
1

I seriously wonder what you mean by sexual attraction. You seem to relate it to - let’s get it on right now. That’s is not sexual attraction. Sexual attraction is finding someone attractive enough that you would consider whether a date would be an option, thinking there’s a possibility they might make a good partner - and you would choose to talk to them to find out, as opposed to immediately finding them ugly and rejecting to spend any time with them. We know most women find most men ugly. And …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/24 11:42 AM
0

That’s the silliest comment I think I might have ever received relating to a thread about sexual dynamics between humans, using metaphors and analogies - and you comment about not being sexually attracted to a lump of rock that has been fashioned into a statue. No wonder there is a growth in AI online OF models. Those inanimate objects definitely seem to have much more rizz and personality than you. Have you considered going back to school until you at least finish 3rd grade?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/24 11:07 AM
1

Maybe because I might assume you are actually a man, and therefore you might be interested in society and the things that impact men and men’s rights. And who can read a title that literally says it is about something else while using the topic as an example to highlight the issue. But no. I was wrong. You’re just an NPC.
/r/MensRights15/06/24 10:50 AM
0

And yet you were so triggered you responded instead of moving on. While ignoring reading the actual post so that you could cogently argue. Very emotional. Just like a woman.
/r/MensRights15/06/24 10:27 AM
5

Empowering women to have their own money to buy you a candy bar? Are they still harking back to the old trope - that no longer exists other than through choice - that women don’t earn their own money? I don’t know if it was your daughter or son that bought you it, or your wife/partner on their behalf, but I would be pissed. The purchaser does not value you, and only values themselves. That is acceptable for young children. But not for adults. If it was an adult, revenge is a dish best served col…
/r/MensRights15/06/24 09:38 AM
0

So you wave the white flag. The post is not about man vs bear, that was the example used to illustrate the true point. If you are refuting the true point, my guess is you have infiltrated this sub from the Mens Lib sub.
/r/MensRights15/06/24 08:48 AM
1

I was intrigued with this post, having heard the label demisexual but not known what it was, Having read it, I don’t think either men or women are demisexual. In general, everyone is attracted naturally and initially to beauty - whatever their view of beauty is - and such assessment of beauty always arises visually at first. What that allows is the start of a journey to discover if there is a mutual attraction and then if you are compatible from a personality perspective. Women may claim they ar…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/24 08:46 AM
1

You’re waving the white flag against Marxist feminism, huh, accepting their supremacy, privilege and unbridled hate?
/r/MensRights15/06/24 07:50 AM
2

The 97% was from NetFlux3s comment above. I didn’t check it
/r/MensRights14/06/24 03:22 PM
2

Yep. And they manipulate that, and claim men don’t have empathy or emotional intelligence. Love telling them how wrong they are and pointing them to evidence sources
/r/MensRights14/06/24 03:03 PM
0

And there’s an easy solution: contribute instead of snipe. Different opinions are good, especially if they come with evidence, but sniping and complaining and demanding people do t talk about it and just let it lie means you’re acting “just like a …”
/r/MensRights14/06/24 02:19 PM
3

Wow. You stating that over 90% of total sexual assaults in all correctional facilities in US are against makes, and 97% of those assaults are committed by women?
/r/MensRights14/06/24 02:14 PM
-1

No. That’s exactly what happened back in The 60s, 70s, 80s and 90s where men just rolled over and we are now in the position we are in. Precisely because of the blasé attitude you display - ignore it and it will go away. You are the fifth column problem men have to deal with. I have no idea why you are in the mens Rights sub. You should be in Men’s Lib.
/r/MensRights14/06/24 02:09 PM
3

They do t understand emotional intelligence and yet they claim men don’t have emotional intelligence because men don’t open up emotionally. For those who are unaware: Emotional intelligence is about understanding when you are in an emotional state, when you have an emotional trigger, and then controlling yourself so that you do not react in an emotional way. It allows you to think o he lively and determine when you are in the wrong, to see things from the other perspective and then respond appro…
/r/MensRights14/06/24 12:59 PM
-1

Thanks for your meta analysis that is nowt to do with the real concept being discussed - the virus that leads to these aspects that is very much alive
/r/MensRights14/06/24 12:54 PM
1

Yeah, understand that point fully
/r/MensRights14/06/24 12:53 PM
2

You’ve mistaken the overriding aspect and focused on the example used. Man vs bear is not an issue that will ever be over - it is a foundational example of the impact of feminism and of the impact of masculinity and how it is perceived. It is how feminism started and continues and where it is going. Its end result is separation and mutual distrust and dislike at a societal and cultural level. The question is how to bring men and women back to some form of normality instead of the polarisation. T…
/r/MensRights14/06/24 10:58 AM
4

Oh they certainly do. I was merely highlighting why, in a juvenile prison system, such power and coercion can come to the fore in such numbers due to their ability to control the impact on the victim if they were to complain. It doesn’t bode well for society because general society is heading that way. There is no such thing as equality - there is merely Fem Supremacy.
/r/MensRights14/06/24 08:52 AM
9

Power dynamics. Young strong lads with good bodies and strong masculine tendencies running through their veins in the prison system who can’t complain for fear of future violence by those in power they accuse Male prison guards have two principles in general: law & order, and heterosexuality. They may have some power control tendencies but they’re not directed by their sexual tendencies. Unlike the others.
/r/MensRights14/06/24 08:26 AM
2

Agree. But they (society, political leadership, lobbyists etc) chose this, and this is how it shall be until they decide it isn’t working.
/r/MensRights13/06/24 03:39 PM
1

Absolutely.
/r/MensRights13/06/24 03:37 PM
1

Not sure
/r/MensRights13/06/24 03:37 PM
3

Merely insulting and shaming language. Confirming that if men do not meet their 9/10+ standards, they are invisible and deemed useless. My definition of a useless man is someone who does not try to better themselves over time, or act emotionally (ie not in the way women think a man is useless). Nearly every person has something they can be very good at, and everyone has flaws. Women of today seem to expect flawlessness as found by the research that men only have 3 things that would be a red flag…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/24 12:25 PM
2

Exactly
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/24 12:18 PM
0

Both. They are not mutually exclusive positions.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/24 12:17 PM
6

WTF? You decided to have a meta argument with yourself about the wording of the concept instead of addressing the conceptual thought the OP was addressing. I can only guess you spend inordinate time looking in the mirror, wonder what each of the sticky out bits mean, and come up with a conclusion that makes little sense
/r/MensRights13/06/24 10:37 AM
1

I’ve used straight logic and rationale to indicate reality. The concept you think that is either complaining or like a little girl really shows your level of mental state. The issue in and of itself is a societal one and impacts everyone, now and into the future. If you think that only people who are actively looking for new relationships should care, you again show your immaturity and do not see the impact it has from a societal or political point t of view, nor the ideology that spawns it and …
/r/MensRights13/06/24 09:30 AM
1

[ Removed by Reddit ]
/r/MensRights13/06/24 09:14 AM
2

I never had problems getting women. They still approach me trying g to initiate - I avoid them. I no longer require chaos, I’ve brought up my kids and there is no requirement now for me to allow chaos into my life again
/r/MensRights13/06/24 09:13 AM
2

You really should be clearer in What you write. But I do ask - how do you know women don’t actually hate men? All the women saying they would choose bear will happily admit the only good thing about men is sex, protection and money. They don’t like men - they like what certain men can bring them. While men’s main motivation is that the person they are with actually wants to be with them, likes them, and views them as fulfilling most of the aspects of their life they can’t deliver themselves. Men…
/r/MensRights13/06/24 09:05 AM
3

Did you mean men can’t get raped? That is objectively untrue. What men can do is bring their own justice if they have what it takes. I do not take it personally. I look at it dispassionately and judge that women really do hate men … for whatever reason. It’s classic misandry. And I act accordingly based on their hatred and keep out of their way. It’s what they want and I have no intention of imposing myself on anyone that really has no intention of enjoying my company and would be a classic dang…
/r/MensRights13/06/24 08:43 AM
6

It reveals that these women are misandrist, based on the very definition that they hate men. Based on the men they choose, because they find good men boring. Which they also hate. In Western societies, the hate if women (misogyny) is often illegal. But equality doesn’t extend to the reverse. I just block women out. I don’t need chaos - nor police turning up based on a false accusation
/r/MensRights12/06/24 06:10 PM
-1

It’s no different from marriage. Based on prior knowledge do the person, there is not one variable that a man can use to determine that the woman won’t completely screw him over and obliterate his life 5 years later. In the same way, women don’t know that the man in the woods wouldn’t harm them. Women don’t meet bears and think they are cuddly. Women who have been asked this question don’t go hiking - and don’t understand that most men hiking are there to get away from everyone, enjoy exercise a…
/r/MensRights12/06/24 06:04 PM
–

Bro really said “virgin, platinum blonde, not a feminist, high-pitched voice, intelligent, creative, stylish, cool, drives a black Chevy, lowkey thicc and at least a 9/10” Man, you sound like a woman
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/24 09:33 AM
–

You gonna be settling kiddie. With a 300lb 304.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/24 06:24 PM
–

You’ll be lucky if you remain alone. You’ll also settle for a semi-obese, 39yo ugly single mom. Separately, a woman you described doesn’t exist. The last two are mutually exclusive. And you sound like a 15yo pronhub user from the Tradcon Bible Belt
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/24 06:10 PM
1

I got happiness. I’m not the one moaning about getting divorced after 6 month and finally asking a men’s rights subreddit for advice after you eventually realised how you screwed everything up. Wondering if you were a staunch feminist - now you’re gonna get “red pill” lol My guess is you’ll do it again and again, never learning. No saving some people.
/r/MensRights10/06/24 05:42 PM
1

On your poor vs elitist comparison. That’s not what I meant. The elites are those who control society - and having men completely screwed over through marriage is exactly where they want you to be- broke and broken, irrespective whether they are still in the marriage or not.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/24 06:57 PM
1

You’re arguing the way society has developed it. And it still doesn’t work, lol. Would you put everything you own on a 50:50? I’ve seen it at the casino. The house always wins lol 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/24 06:55 PM
1

If it’s already gone wrong and you try to manipulate someone to stay, through (for example) persuading someone to stay with threats (“you won’t see the kids ever again!” or “I’ll find you and do something to you”) or horrific forecasts (“you’ll be on the streets”, “no one will believe you and I’ll tell everyone what you did last year”, or “I’ll end myself if you leave”) etc That type of manipulative coercion never works. Always makes it much worse
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/24 06:52 PM
1

I’m merely indicating when it’s over. It’s always visible and clear, and a quick excision helps everyone. Keep it going after that point and hate ensues. I have no solutions on how to make a relationship work out. I’ve always noticed coercion fails, and makes things worse long term
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/24 05:20 PM
1

Because one of you sees something else that is nice and shiny and may provide all of the current benefits and then more (such as more money, more sexual desire, more holidays, more excitement). What you proposed is sheer boredom to many people. Maybe not in year 1, but pretty soon afterwards. This is exactly the reason why the majority of women bring divorce proceedings. You’re boring, not giving them enough excitement - and they see it elsewhere. The grass is greener. Unfortunately for them it …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/24 03:31 PM
1

Complete propaganda. Marriage is a religious tradition that societies have taken on because it benefits the elites. It doesn’t benefit anyone if 90% of marriages are unhappy and over 50% end in divorce. Legally binding childcare decisions? I’m not sure you have any idea what you are talking about. The Government imposes those irrespective of marriage
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/24 03:26 PM
1

Agree. And even with those aspects in place during the relationship, only as long as both of you are happy and fulfilled with each other will the relationship continue.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/24 12:13 PM
1

You don’t need a marriage at all for any of that to be accomplished. But your flair is accurate.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/24 12:11 PM
1

with those things in place, if one of you is no longer happy to see the other, the relationship becomes untenable
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/24 12:07 PM
1

Because the whole concept of marriage is “til death do us part”. If that isn’t the case, the whole concept of marriage is negated and there is no justification for it. You just have a series of temporary arrangements
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/24 01:14 AM
1

I hear ya
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/24 02:43 PM
1

Those are starting requirements for entering a relationship. The post is more about bare minimum for “being in” a relationship. Sorry if unclear
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/24 02:15 PM
1

Your preferences are somewhat shallow. And you might still be unhappy with such a person based on some other requirement you find he lacks despite meeting all the things you listed. Interesting thing about being happy with someone is that they already meet and continue to meet your current and ongoing requirements and you feel fulfilled and enriched with them in your life most of the time. Else you would find someone else or just prefer to be alone.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/24 01:26 PM
-1

So as long as she has a pulse you would stay with her and be happy. Right.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/24 01:23 PM
1

We’re on the same page. Minimum requirement is that you are and remain happy with her (which may include ongoing sexual attraction for you among other preferences) and that she is happy with you (based on whatever preferences she has). Even if she continues to meet all your preferences but you find someone you want even more, you may no longer be happy with the original and leave to be with the other.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/24 01:23 PM
1

Would you be happy there? I’m guessing if you weren’t, you would leave
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/24 01:19 PM
1

So you wouldn’t be happy to see them or be with them. Point proven. The post isn’t about the start of a relationship but keeping it going for a long time
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/24 01:18 PM
1

You’re talking about the start of a relationship. The post is about an ongoing relationship. Attraction wanes. What happens when you’re a 300lb lazy slob at 50 like what happens to so many men - you expecting her to stay?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/24 01:17 PM
1

Nearly every one of those end up with divorce or relationship ending (or the abuser in prison for murder)
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/24 01:15 PM
1

Yes. But it’s not something that is sustainable because only 10% of couples actually succeed in a happy lifelong marriage with one person (self reporting data). People are still being sold the Disney lie - despite the anti-patriarchy anti-traditional society, many still search and clutch at this thing that ruins lives
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/24 01:14 PM
1

You could have a long lasting relationship merely based on them not being loud and annoying? That’s an extreme level of low bare minimum. Sounds a little too bare to me an ugly, fat, broke, smelly, weak - all are acceptable as long as quiet and not annoying. Are you loud and annoying?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/24 01:12 PM
1

Unclear what you mean by being separated by family. I think we are on the same page. You seem to have had something that others might never feel , and would never be aware of, and you may never feel again. But others would never know what that feeling was and would mistake it as something else. And make the same decisions (eg marriage) but it wouldn’t last. Which is exactly what my post is about.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/24 01:05 PM
1

In other words, people make bad decisions based on feelings they do not realise are fleeting (eg the difference between lust and love). But even so, they would still claim there was a spark, just not the same type of spark you got. And as soon as their spark fades, (I won’t mention things more sinister like they had an ulterior motive to get with that person such as money etc), the relationship ends with regret and often doesn’t end early enough and they carry around a level of hate. It’s a diff…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/24 11:56 AM
1

I’m really happy that you and your partner appear to be one of the 10%. It also seems that the key part for that longevity is that you both remain very happy with each other in general. I assure you I have not focused on superficial sexual attraction, I merely focused on your word “spark” and that in pretty much every failed relationship (and ongoing unhappy relationship), that spark disappears and is replaced with something not so good.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/24 11:15 AM
2

Drizzle Drizzle
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/24 11:11 AM
1

I accept that spark is required to commence a relationship. Along with meeting all other preferences. Every marriage starts in exactly that way. Both parties profess their everlasting love and vow to be together til death do us part, through sickness and health, for richer or poorer. Evidence shows that the spark most definitely disappears in over 50% with over 75% women determining they need the marriage to end (with the vast majority because they are no longer happy as opposed to any other abu…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/24 10:17 AM
1

And yet “attraction” wanes as does sexual desire. And boring life continues. The question remains whether you continue to be happy or content with your life with that person. At the point you (or they) are no longer happy or content with the other person, where one shows disrespect, disdain or walks out when the other enters a room or snarls at the other constantly, that is the point the relationship ends. Irrespective of every other aspect. This is how divorces occur and other relationships end…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/24 10:03 AM
1

So you have the spark. That makes you happy, irrespective of anything and everything else. Based on the spark, would you expect marriage? Are you expecting the spark lasts forever, as would the marriage? What happens when / if you lose the “spark”? My guess is you are no longer happy to be with that person or even in the same vicinity, and the relationship would dwindle and you would end it. But what if something deeper than “the spark” happens? My guess is you would have changed your priorities…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/24 09:58 AM
4

Your attempts to push it indicate you are wanting to manipulate him and indicate you can be trusted. That is, for men, manipulating. He will choose - based on your actions - whether to trust you. Or not.
/r/MensRights06/06/24 08:49 PM
-1

The word “disadvantages” is loaded because its interpretation will be different for all. The word rights isn’t loaded.
/r/MensRights06/06/24 08:47 PM
-3

Disadvantages? That’s irrelevant, men and women have different physiologies and things that happen. Examples: periods, menopause, physical attributes, emotional, lack of rationality, other women expect them to join the tribe etc etc. A list of equivalent disadvantages can be made for men in The same way. The issue is about rights and privileges. There is nothing that women lose out on in respect of rights or privileges in Western countries. So your question is loaded.
/r/MensRights06/06/24 08:12 PM
0

You can be respected but he can’t trust you until he chooses to do so. This is why your post is manipulative- you’re trying to work out the psychological way through to him to get more involved in His life without his blessing and before he is willing or ready by asking on this sub. This is not the place. Go ask on relationship advice. This is a men’s rights sub. His rights are that he chooses when to bring you in more. I won’t repeat what I wrote here in your other repeated requests to get me t…
/r/MensRights06/06/24 07:56 PM
1

You just proved you trust the words women say or write off the bat. BelieveAllWomen is a feminist trope that has been proven to be incorrect time and time again. No more can men trust women merely based on what they say. That doesn’t preclude being able to respect them, or listen to them. But trust needs to be earned. The man will determine his time and I libation to trust. This post is very clear - OP is asking for HOW she can manipulate the man to trust her using mens techniques and asking men…
/r/MensRights06/06/24 04:19 PM
-2

So determining someone’s true intent is being a pile of shit? I think you have some ongoing work to do.
/r/MensRights06/06/24 04:08 PM
0

It’s a manipulative pick-me post. She is asking for relationship advice on how to weedle her way into his life when he clearly doesn’t trust her. Rightly. There is no evidence that this post is anything but an attempt to psychologically make this man trust her - with all risk landing on the man is being manipulated. believeallwomen is a major issue for men as it leads to men being shit on. Respect should always be given until that person shows they should not be respected. Trust should never be …
/r/MensRights06/06/24 12:10 PM
0

The people on this sub are no longer here for mens rights. It has been infiltrated and will become a feminist space
/r/MensRights06/06/24 12:00 PM
1

That would be fine. The man will make his own decisions on her. She doesn’t need to be given manipulative tactics on a men’s rights subreddit on how she can weedle her way into his life. Which is what she is trying to do.
/r/MensRights06/06/24 11:39 AM
1

In essence she is asking men for the best way to be a “pick me” and it’s very unclear if she has the man’s best interests at heart or her own for wider personal purposes. And a lot of replies are by women. This sub is becoming a relationship advice sub and it needs to return to its roots
/r/MensRights06/06/24 11:35 AM
0

None of that is what I asked you. You can glibly pass through life believing the best of people if you wish, but the reason there is this subreddit in the first place is because sure men have glibly believed all women and then been shafted by not only them but also by laws and Governments subsequently. Your desire to trust without evidence and merely on the basis of words is not rational given what we all know about the general issues and what you have experienced in your own life.
/r/MensRights06/06/24 11:32 AM
-2

Why do you believe what she wrote is her actual motive? Rather than a request on how to manipulate?
/r/MensRights06/06/24 10:28 AM
3

Why is this in the Mens Rights sub? This is relationship advice and should be in there. This sub has been infiltrated and stolen by women. This sub is about men’s rights, not women’s woes relating to how to manipulate men. Men will sort themselves out and womens advice to other women about how to deal with men is exactly why this sub is here, so that we can understand how women control men. Which is exactly what you are asking.
/r/MensRights06/06/24 10:26 AM
9

Gratefully received.
/r/MensRights05/06/24 11:30 AM
-5

Yep - after 8 years if Ukraine killing ethnic Russians throughout Donbass and wider areas, and assassinations, and Ukraine and the West choosing not to implement the Minsk Agreements, Russia went in to fix the place. FAFO. It’s ok though. It will all be done soon
/r/MensRights05/06/24 11:28 AM
-21

Yes - Incredibly depressing that people believe such obvious disinformation from Ukraines mouthpiece propaganda machine
/r/MensRights05/06/24 09:18 AM
-16

This comment shows you have never been to war and have no idea what is going on.
/r/MensRights05/06/24 09:17 AM
2

Do you really believe this is true, as opposed to Ukrainian propaganda promoted by a Ukrainian mouthpiece media outlet controlled by the a Ukrainian Government? Your spider senses should be tingling. Misinformation and disinformation like this is common, especially in a combat situation. The reality is opposite to what Ukraine Pravda writes.
/r/MensRights05/06/24 09:15 AM
2

Just like education (where boys are expected to sit still like girls for hours on end), counselling in this manner is built for women, by women. Why to chose to do this therapy is beyond me, other than you have had it drilled into you by your society and upbringing that it is what you should do. You need to get out of this mindset. You need the Dad You Never Had (by Aaron Clarey) and you need the ability and time to work stuff out and think clearly what you can do about it and what needs to be c…
/r/MensRights01/06/24 09:40 PM
6

First, you should have audio recorded it. Second, audio record all your dates - for your own safety in case someone attempts to accuse you or blackmail you of something. Third, you should have politely got up and just left. She can sort everything out for herself after that. Fourth - you are now fully aware. Treat it like a game. You may be lucky and eventually find someone who is actually nice. Chances are slim but ….
/r/MensRights31/05/24 04:45 PM
1

They would turn it round - patriarchy, men just wanting to control women, lies and bullying, incels and weak men, toxic masculinity etc etc. Just leave women to their cats and dogs - protect yourself at all times
/r/MensRights31/05/24 02:31 PM
–

Many autistic people are still virgins, many incels are autistic. Not saying that as a pejorative but merely as a factual statement. However, autism is a spectrum. You seem to be conflating it as all autistic people are severely disabled. This is not true. But anyone expecting intimate relationships - whether male or female, whether autistic or not - is fantasy. No one should ever expect from life that they will find someone willing to be with them.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/24 11:20 AM
31

By middle age, it is clear to me that all women are victims of too much grape. And the alcohol % is continually going up. They need to be weaned off the grape, it’s very bad for them. Their skin goes pallid and starts to look like it’s falling off. Their hair goes dank, they can’t speak coherently, and they think that jumping on you is their right. Ban women from drinking grapes immediately.
/r/MensRights31/05/24 11:14 AM
5

Women define “violence” and “abuse” as someone saying No. Or I no longer love you. They also destroy peoples reputations and use their tongue viciously, focusing on putting people down instead of being logical or rational. Women are also prone to physical violence regularly and expect that the other person will not respond in kind. As soon as they do, they call the police and get a restraining order in order to play the victim when they are the perpetrator. This is why women are usually always t…
/r/MensRights29/05/24 04:51 PM
0

Unfortunately, men need to start stepping up. No more just sitting in mom's basement playing video games and eating cheeto's, men must work hard at being the best they can be while working hard at understanding the game of society and how they are screwed over. If the best place for an individual man is University, autodidact technology, a trade or the military, that man must put his all into it and become an expert. Then work out the navigation trail to fill in the parts of manhood he has not y…
/r/MensRights26/05/24 10:45 PM
27

If you want complete freedom, never marry and never cohabitate, never allow a woman to be dependent on you, make sure they work. If you have children, it is your responsibility to make sure the child is financially looked after. Or get hooked in and then suffer the consequences. Roll the dice.
/r/MensRights25/05/24 05:49 PM
6

I wonder how many times people told you this stuff and you rejected it. Now your eyes are open - this is the start of your RP journey. Never look at the words, always look at the actions. And make your choices and decisions based on how the world really is, not how they like to tell you how it is.
/r/MensRights25/05/24 05:44 PM
20

Own it. Change your dating profile to include it, and tell women that if they don’t meet the standards you are looking for, you will not be exclusive with them. Challenge them to be the one to tie you down. Include that you have a secret profile on There and will sue anyone who defames you. And that every interaction will be recorded.
/r/MensRights25/05/24 05:40 PM
40

I sincerely hope someone will bring an appeal for this unduly lenient sentence
/r/MensRights25/05/24 05:35 PM
0

In today’s day and age, you got married? Then you come to the Men’s Rights sub. I dont understand people these days, all the information is out there and still you did it. I think you should pay alimony, for a decade, to teach you a lesson that you clearly rejected until suddenly reality is hitting you in the face
/r/MensRights25/05/24 05:32 PM
1

She will lose the military quarters but you might be able to remain. Shared bank account suggests she is working? Unclear who earns more. Your issue is if you get assigned abroad. You will not be close to your kids. Give her the flat. You take the £s. You pay child maintenance. Don’t allow it to eke out. If she kicks you out, take the flat and the military will remove her from the quarters. All very strange but lots of options. Or get yourself assigned abroad quickly and give yourself a lot of t…
/r/MensRights05/05/24 11:01 PM
10

Need an army of 6-6-6 AI guys for the gals, let them pay for it. Seriously, it's about time men stopped paying for internet sex interactions. Wanna pay? Get a real-life prostitute. But please stop throwing money at the OF and online dating genre, it is harming you and every prospect you might ever have of an intimate relationship
/r/MensRights29/01/24 07:23 AM
14

Or enjoying 304 status is insanity
/r/MensRights07/12/23 04:22 PM
114

She wants to have the court consider it under the mental health act!!! Is she claiming insanity? That’s hilarious. From her pictures, I sincerely hope it’s only men she rides, not horses. They would have a hard life. But no wonder it took 6 blokes - how do they not know if it was 5 or 6?
/r/MensRights07/12/23 01:25 PM
–

Maybe we can strike yours off because it’s made up bull based on desire instead of the reality. Women cause high levels of divorce in heterosexual marriages. And they really can’t stand each other in lesbian relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/23 11:59 PM
–

Or it’s the simple answer that two women together will generally be explosive, chaotic, violent, argumentative, jealous, full of indirect aggression and microaggressions, and bitchy arguments about who is doing the right amount of washing up and cooking
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/23 10:10 PM
2

Tell him you recognise her societal changes have made things so much worse for such a large proportion of men. And you advocate for men’s rights as you are a proponent of justice, objectivity, equality and fairness. But also recognise when specific men do things wrong, without blaming all men. That will do it. And he’s likely to ask questions. But be prepared for his feminist fatherless upbringing to make waves
/r/MensRights03/12/23 07:58 PM
1

Haha. You friend zoned a bunch of women who want you? Kudos. Stick to it, and go get the woman you want when the time is right. They will all be bitching and moaning, but don’t give any a chance to get you alone. They may accuse you of anything. Be careful.
/r/MensRights03/12/23 07:45 PM
–

Haha. Divorce rates amongst same-sex women partnerships are 75%, because women always think the grass can be greener. Then they find no one likes them and they only offer bitterness and vitriol. This is a daft comment based on ideology rather than reality, lol
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/23 07:39 PM
–

Men in general don’t give AF either now. They don’t approach cold due to the responses they receive, or the accusations, and they don’t get any matches on dating apps when only men pay for those apps. Things might change in a generation or so, when the world population is at 60% of now, but I doubt it. More men will just make their money and happily shuffle off to a hermit life of the internet, pub, motorbikes, cars and no chaos. Winning.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/23 07:36 PM
1

Sincerely? Thou protesteth too much. I smell bull. And let’s say he is an incel who is completely unattractive and invisible to women. You just shit on him more with your complete lack of empathy and your disgusting insults.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/23 09:36 PM
1

No offense but you sound like the type of person who likes to shit on other peoples opinions and life experiences. The school bully who no one likes. The guy who wishes what he wrote was true because he believes Disney fairytales
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/23 08:06 AM
-1

Always ensure any woman is okay with taking a paternity test and have it included in a prenup if you are getting married. She knows she is the mother, you deserve to have absolute evidence you are the father
/r/MensRights19/11/23 03:59 PM
1

Unlike you, I read the whole thing
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/23 04:36 PM
1

You have provided zero evidence. And you immediately move to personal insults. Good to know you're a fallacious POS
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/23 03:14 PM
0

So it's not a red-pill lie and it's not "generally" for a "more transactional relationship" Great to know you just made that shit up
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/23 03:04 PM
–

Welcome to MGTOW
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/23 02:15 PM
-1

The women that denigrate those younger women who are with older men are just misogynists. They hate those women, they call them immature and vulnerable, they tell them they don’t have adult capacity to make their own choices. It’s unbelievably hateful and is the purest form of misogyny. They don’t even understand they are doing it. Hilarious.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/23 01:36 PM
1

Tada. And we have a winner. Someone who finally, throughout the long list of comments, who understands the fallacy of the old-looking ugly creep who clings desperately to the Disney fiction of happy ever after.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/23 09:29 AM
1

Or prostitutes
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/23 09:26 AM
1

Do you have any evidence for that position?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/23 09:23 AM
1

You mistake anecdote for data. I guess you were so concerned with your personal creepiness at University that you never learned how to analyse information. Stay blue, team red doesn’t need you.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/23 09:22 AM
5

You missed an important word out - I was only referencing real men. Men brought up with both parents, not necessarily in the same house, or with strong good male role models, and who know how to be principled, strong, respectful, competitive men, able to win and lose, happy to be average, below or above, and not shit on people. You missed the whole element from both your post and your cancel culture subreddits. You don’t understand that category of men, the ones willing to sacrifice themselves f…
/r/MensRights13/11/23 08:15 PM
0

Ask them to define misogyny and you find out they don’t have a clue what it means. Men have never hated women - only pseudo-men brought up by single mothers in liberal areas are so fucked up by their indoctrinated self hatred that they might eventually think that way when they realise the reality. Then they end up in prison. Men merely wish women weren’t utter and total butches who objectify men to determine who to date - just the top 10% - and openly hate the rest. They refuse to allow men to a…
/r/MensRights13/11/23 08:10 PM
9

If he really wants to know what’s happening with men, he will stay here. And he will get the reality. It’s up to him what he does with it. Your remark stinks, just like the other subs you promoted with their cancel culture and lack of free speech to get to the real issues impacting real men.
/r/MensRights13/11/23 08:03 PM
1

Make friend groups can be everything. What they are is tough. You will hear stuff you don’t like and have the opportunity to counter it, and sometimes that will work and sometimes it won’t. You will hear stuff and see stuff that will break your heart - and no woman ever sees it. Men are human. Men are flawed. Many men are pissed off because they’re average or below or just above in very way and are treated like shit. But they bounce back and laugh and joke with their mates. The biggest problem i…
/r/MensRights13/11/23 08:00 PM
2

Nice projection on your stupid ideas of what men are like. But it is equivalent to racist and fascist - you use it to dehumanise people. Only illiterate scum does that.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/23 10:24 PM
1

Nope. You need to do your research both on The original definition from the 1990s and on the definition used in all research. Volcels are those who choose to be celibate. They ain’t looking or frustrated. However, virgins who remain frustrated could often be described as part of the population who will join incel forums. But there only about 40k of those worldwide - in comparison to the 10m incels below 30yo in USA right now. Yep - that’s just ‘Murica.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/23 10:22 PM
1

So you happily stigmatise true incels by intimating incels have (in your view) opinions you don’t like. No different from being racist or fascist. Bravo.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/23 08:44 PM
2

That’s not right. An incel is someone who, over the last 6months or 12 months, has been looking for intimate relationships but has been unable to find any during that time period (involuntary and celibate). Male or female. It doesn’t necessarily mean they have never had sex
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/23 08:42 PM
–

I merely asked questions. You decided to not answer them. I gave you options and possibilities. I'm not in any way looking at accusing you of hypergamy - but your hypocrisy and inability to answer straight questions with straight answers does show what and who you are
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/23 07:41 PM
–

So you still haven’t answered what you mean by grows, or the characteristics of growth you hold to.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/23 06:11 PM
–

I note you hold men (and your husband) to things you do not hold yourself to, including having a good character. And you never explained what you mean by "grows", which is one of the vaguest terms possible (and is why I provided some options and you chose not to cover it). I do wonder whether you have ever asked your husband what he looks for.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/23 04:53 PM
1

These men do all those things. And are still ignored. You women only go for “bad boys”. We don’t care for you anymore. We’re gone.
/r/MensRights10/11/23 03:01 PM
1

How do you suggest they do that? Maybe make up, or plastic surgery, or bone extensions, or wigs? Funny how shaming someone for their natural characteristics that they have no control over is acceptable. What about weight? I have a feeling with your attitude and personality you will be alone. Soon.
/r/MensRights10/11/23 02:44 PM
1

The reason they’re single mothers is because they opened their legs easily to some bad boy instead of choosing any one of the many guys they reject or perceive as invisible or aren’t attracted to because nice guys always finish last. Or they stole the sperm from a used condom. Or they baby trapped a guy. Or they married a guy solely to divorce him and gain a financial reward. Or they are so toxic that no man would ever consider marrying them. Or they just wanted the government to pay them. We’re…
/r/MensRights10/11/23 02:26 PM
1

Who claimed different? That's why we have laws! And prisons, and why men fill the military and police forces, because good men are needed to catch the bad ones. But nothing throughout society has worked in stopping bad men from being bad men. The only thing that is pretty much guaranteed is that every bad man was brought up by a shit mother. 85% of men in US in prison were brought up by single mothers. If you teach men to be women, and bring them up in a female environment, you end up with toxic…
/r/MensRights09/11/23 08:57 PM
2

Perfect answer. I have no issue with that, it mirrors how I have lived my life.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/23 07:12 PM
0

Do you reciprocate? You will always support yourself? Your man can be assured you are not dating them because you need their income in order to be supported, you will not demand/expect they pay for you from the first date to the last?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/23 06:41 PM
0

How about you provide what you meant by "I want my man’s salary to be enough to support himself. I don’t want to be with a man who is using me for my money" and if you reciprocate that principle It's not difficult. You can instead continue being arsey, as is your prerogative, but it doesn't enhance conversations or the ability of people to understand what women actually want
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/23 06:34 PM
1

In a non-high cost area, what proportion of men earn $70k (ie that's a high salary in a non-high cost place)? I do note from your post higher in this thread you are currently with someone that m,eets your financial requirements, but if that doesn't last (and men choose whether there is marriage or not), how many others are out there in your environs and available that will choose you? It's not a dig, you sound absolutely wonderful, I'm just wondering about the proportions in your area at a time …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/23 06:32 PM
0

Your principle is - no-one uses anyone for their money. I'm on board with that, it's about removing the patriarchy and ensuring equality. But I'm pretty sure you weren't looking at the reciprocal, you just want "my money is my money, your money is my money". Complete hypocrisy and promoting patriarchy.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/23 06:26 PM
1

I want my man’s salary to be enough to support himself. I don’t want to be with a man who is using me for my money. I want my woman’s salary to be enough to support herself. I don’t want to be with a woman who is using me for my money. Doesn't sound so good, but then again, that's how equality rolls.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/23 06:17 PM
1

So would you be happy if he was also "hard-working and relatively ambitious without being super career focused". And what if his salary was the same as yours, or at the average 40k mark? The issue I see is that you want to be a SAHM, and that requires the man to be making enough to cover the whole lives of two adults plus the children, including all the mod cons (house, utilities, cars etc). While you don't earn. In today's day and age, that is super tough, especially if you live in such a high …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/23 06:15 PM
1

We wouldn’t need laws either. Everyone would be perfect. We wouldn’t have narcissists or geniuses. We wouldn’t have gold diggers or nagging wives or sisters. We wouldn’t have false accusations or baby trappers. In fact, we would just be robots, not human. That’s the utopia you want. Most idiotic thing ever that completely eradicates the whole of human personalities. Luckily for the 43IQ mob, there are men to see what the real world is actually like, and deal with that reality instead of wishing …
/r/MensRights09/11/23 02:50 PM
4

Exactly. Those women have very few personality traits that a man really wants. Why would a man want to marry a man? When he wants the type of woman who will make them feel content in life and who will be there for him not for what he does or brings
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/23 11:00 AM
4

You don’t. These people are living in fantasy land, the number of men earning that much and available is waaaay less than 1%. And if they’re still available, they’re either divorced, not looking for any marriage, or someone who doesn’t attract women
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/23 10:58 AM
1

You’ve been very selective in just looking at one table. There is plenty of other information that would show you are looking for a man with a Masters degree and a specific type of job. They are getting fewer and fewer. And the median average is skewed heavily in favour of those with degrees - considering over 60% of those are women, your numbers get even smaller.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/23 10:54 AM
1

Sounds good. Do you hold yourself to the same standards and principles?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/23 10:46 AM
1

That seems a good position. Do you hold yourself to the same principles - willingness to work, good character, interest in growth in terms that your man is looking for (rational, logical, spirited but not stubborn, able to see the other perspective, not hypocritical, understanding and understandable etc)?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/23 10:46 AM
2

She’s only Level 3 and hoping to jump on the coat tails of the Level 50s. The SIGN language shows she is heading for Level 4 soon. Pink hair will get her to Level 5.
/r/MensRights08/11/23 12:01 PM
1

You spawn on an island and build your defences. You develop to level 50 through training, skill, watching and learning from the outside world and developing the right philosophy. You annihilate who you can, when the opportunity arises, and the others come flocking to you. And you never let any of them challenge you, by annihilating them. And you become the best in your world.
/r/MensRights08/11/23 11:54 AM
4

Yep. You have worked out that life is hard and you can’t believe any women. And you never knew this because you had no male role models. Welcome to reality. So now you know you focus on yourself and never put a woman on a pedestal. Treat everyone with respect, until they show they deserve none and you get them out of your life. Being a man is competitive. The assholes treating you badly probably had it ingrained into them but never understood the make code - they’re just bullies who wish their l…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/23 11:22 AM
1

You’re clearly a unicorn.
/r/MensRights04/11/23 12:04 PM
2

Half and half. I’m with you on equality requirements and on “words can never hurt me” - except any accusation can end you. You must take care to know how you are perceived and the risks of rising up, because some will want to bring you down. And they will use that unfair judicial and economic system to do that.
/r/MensRights04/11/23 10:02 AM
2

Ensure everyone knows what they need to do by when, and hold them to account to meet it. Judge them all equally. Those who are good and those who aren’t will be clear, irrespective of gender. Plenty of men have the same traits as you complain of nowadays, and they hide behind deflection, blame others and no accountability. Men with principles and expertise will eventually rise, but not to the top. Those at the top are either owners or those with the verbal skills to lie and intimidate.
/r/MensRights04/11/23 09:59 AM
1

It’s always an option. As OP chose. But once you find the sensible guys talking about the real red pill - ie what changes did we make as a society many years ago, and what do the stats say on whether such changes are doing society well or not (evaluation of scientific experiments for the win!) - rather than just the ones who want your money and grift with emotional bollocks (pick stuff up, put it down, join a religious cult, you get the girls who want lifelong marriage) then we will all move on …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/23 05:59 PM
1

Men having emotions is not the problem. Any woman that judges a man in this way should be cast out - and the man should use it as a shut test to determine if the woman is worth their while. Men being unable to differentiate when their emotions are ruling their decisions and men making emotionally-based irrational decisions are not acting rationally. The difference is clear. Showing emotion versus acting based on emotions.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/23 12:08 PM
3

You work out how to make yourself wanted by women. You may not make the $100k, but you can find a chubby 35yo virgin that’s thirsty for marriage if you look for them in the right place and are naturally a good, masculine guy. And they might have money. And you might be the winner in a divorce. In reality, you’re “doomed” talk is weak af. You will always be single if you come across like that. You need some help from Aaron Clarey or Jordan Peterson on understanding what your dad never taught you,…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/23 11:46 AM
0

Now that you know, it’s time to grab yourself by the bootstraps and make the damn best of it. Stop whining! Live your best life, it’s what men and women have had to do since the dawn of time, especially those of us born into working class northern backgrounds.
/r/MensRights02/11/23 04:48 PM
3

Very strange. They all kept their staunch patriarchal view that marriage was the thing to do. When all their parents got divorced and brought them up in unhappy households. Then they ended up as single parents struggling. But they do like to maintain a brave face, while drinking their tears away with a bottle of wine every night. The alcoholism is unreal. I have no issue with anyone rejecting marriage - it’s what I understood in 1982 was the only way forward. But going back is silliness for this…
/r/MensRights02/11/23 04:46 PM
1

The issue is not that she is doing this, which seems to be general banter between friends, but that she thinks it is ok to say it in a professional setting. But you can’t just passively ignore it and then act passive-aggressive on here or with her. You need to confront it with her and tell her it is very inappropriate in that setting, and that it is causing you anxiety and making you question her worth as a friend or colleague. That leaves you to choose (if it happens again in that setting) to r…
/r/MensRights02/11/23 04:16 PM
3

If they have been put together properly with everyone having independent legal advice and a few months to think about it (ie no coercion), then they usually always stand up in court. It’s not about protection though, it’s about agreeing a different outcome than the State prenup (which is only protection for the lowest paid in the relationship). Never allow your wife to be a SAHM, make sure you have a good agreement based on shared lifestyles and assets bought during the marriage only, and have g…
/r/MensRights01/11/23 08:20 PM
0

Men do commit. It just takes longer. But once they have made that decision, it’s generally a loyalty that is very difficult to break. A few who do not act like that are then used to describe the whole population by women.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/23 08:05 PM
1

Only the weakest men, who will abuse those who tell them the reality nowadays, will ever get married and without a prenup. Then they complain and become red pilled? Zero simpathy. (Check spelling. Tick.)
/r/MensRights01/11/23 07:55 PM
1

I don’t think you’re being serious. Incel is not about getting sex, that’s a byproduct. Please use the internet to really find out.
/r/MensRights31/10/23 11:52 AM
1

Some may have said that. But some people want war. And some steal through foody dates. And some want capital punishment. And Japan is trying to coerce leftover women and unwanted men to get married. The world is full of people who have extreme ideas, and then it’s full of media who search for extremes and apply the extreme idea to all people with certain characteristics. And some people fall for it and repeat it.
/r/MensRights31/10/23 08:29 AM
1

It’s not at all the opposite of slut. Slut implies choice, involvement and bad decisions. Incels have no choices, no decisions, generally no friends, are excluded, and most often suffer from huge loneliness and frustration issues. Their main thoughts are, what is the point of carrying on?
/r/MensRights31/10/23 08:17 AM
0

It only means that to the people who don’t understand its true nature and impact. Ignorance when you have a research computer at your fingertips is the height of stupidity.
/r/MensRights30/10/23 10:38 PM
3

Volcel is the way to go, especially as you get older. Some call it monk, but avoiding all women at all times is too hardcore even for me.
/r/MensRights30/10/23 10:37 PM
3

I would only change misogyny to Misandry in that.
/r/MensRights30/10/23 10:35 PM
1

Bang on. SIGN language, most often employed by women. But in this case, also often given by weakass men to other men they see as beneath them. These are the guys who wanted to be bullies in high school but couldn’t even do that successfully.
/r/MensRights30/10/23 10:34 PM
3

Ffs, do some research
/r/MensRights30/10/23 10:31 PM
0

Incel is not about sex. Sex was just a method of counting. Incel is about being ostracised and excluded from what society offers - an intimate one on one relationship, friendship and partnership. It’s the feeling of being part of normality, being wanted for who you are. Incels never get that - sex is easy to buy but that is not the factor in play. Time for you to do s9me research and up your game if you’re gonna play.
/r/MensRights30/10/23 10:30 PM
2

I’ve been “accused” of being an incel so many times on here lol. They don’t know what it means, nor the hurt that real incels are actually going through. And it’s not gendered either - more women under age 30 are incels than men. Anyone throwing it out as an insult shows their complete lack of empathy to a huge proportion, albeit a minority, of men and women who are exceptionally lonely, feel excluded and cannot do anything about the traits they were born with. Such people who label others in th…
/r/MensRights30/10/23 10:27 PM
2

He’s a complete knob. If this is his way of “being a man” you know you’re in for a rough ride. I understand he was trying to pull the traditional social constructs, but his reasons are weak and sketch. And clearly not the type of person you are looking for.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/23 10:19 PM
1

I’m assuming you’re just taking the piss.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/23 07:02 AM
1

Interesting. From what I’ve heard, but not verified, divorce rates among lesbians are about 75%. Gay men, much less than heterosexual divorce rate.
/r/MensRights22/10/23 10:39 PM
2

Even men’s sheds, dedicated to men resolving men’s issues (mental health, loneliness, suicide prevention etc) through undertaking and learning activities together, had to open up to women. Women demanded that men not have a safe space to combat men’s issues! It needs fighting against.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/23 05:02 PM
1

If you see a camera out, walk past it and accidentally kick it or drop a kettle on it. Or stand right in front of it with your back to the girl and do your session. Making noises. Scratch your armpits. Reminds me of the guy who purposefully sits in the camera view in public parks. Do it on purpose, the space is yours as much as theirs.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/23 04:54 PM
3

We have equality now. There is no reason for women only spaces without having the same equal opportunity for men only spaces. There is zero requirement now for any women only promotions of certain industries, recruitment drives aimed at women, etc. Full opportunity of choice is there What I really want is the removal of all gender-biased or sex-biased spaces, except where there is a safety rationale or a single sex requirement where the introduction of someone of the different sex prevents the i…
/r/MensRights22/10/23 04:46 PM
1

Fair enough point. You do you, others see things differently. Your opinion is valid.
/r/MensRights22/10/23 01:06 PM
3

Because life is about social interaction and mating. Therefore men and women together is perceived to be the norm and is what society requires and has constructed. And it’s about fairness and justice. When those things fall apart, there’s a reaction. MGTOW is merely the reaction. It’s simple, it’s rational and it impacts society and Government power because men are taking their own power back without providing power to the machine. As they choose, given the way the machine has made it so bad for…
/r/MensRights22/10/23 01:05 PM
6

Amazing research, thanks for the link.
/r/MensRights21/10/23 08:16 PM
5

Ha! The peace would be shattered in the first few days, and then never be less than a crescendo. The inability to let the slightest slight go, the demand that "I'm in the right" and zero empathy of the other person's point of view, the gaslighting and flying monkeys. Just some man please steal the red button - under no circumstances should women ever have access to it. And expect that prisons would be full of innocent men whose sole crime was not prepared to propose to anyone and whose sole purp…
/r/MensRights21/10/23 08:09 PM
2

k
/r/MensRights21/10/23 07:25 PM
4

It's quite simple. You do you, man. I'll do me. It's called going your own way. I fully accept you are who you are. Now to what happened. I'll write it simply to help you understand what you did. I wrote a post on Reddit, based on a question asked to me by a woman, on Reddit. The question she asked is the title to this post. I explained a lot of things to her in the post, to help her understand, and I then pasted it on here (which was good, because the other subreddit's Mods took my original dow…
/r/MensRights21/10/23 07:14 PM
-1

k
/r/MensRights21/10/23 07:00 PM
3

Emotional Damage! The person who tried to label me a woman and a feminist, doesn't understand justification or any of the aspects, has probably never read a book, has an emotional aneurysm after a bit of pushback. OKaaaaay. ​ ​ backs away slowly from the strange man with the snarly face who just wants to be the big I am to tell everyone what they should think and say
/r/MensRights21/10/23 06:50 PM
6

I can't help it if you're TikTok Generation and have the attention span of a gnat. You do it your way, bruh.
/r/MensRights21/10/23 06:28 PM
1

Cool. Apologies.
/r/MensRights21/10/23 05:27 PM
6

I suggest you google the following term "no men at speed dating events". And I was referring to the shutting down of speed dating businesses and speed dating clubs (ie things like groups on Facebook). I wasn't mentioning "clubbing", although all such clubs in my (non-City) area have closed down over the last two decades
/r/MensRights21/10/23 05:24 PM
7

K. You ignore everything written in my OP and just spout. You have every right to do that and I will never prevent it. ​ To clarify: MGTOW is not a movement. Living your life is not a movement. MGTOW is a label (as you state) that needs describing, and some men will choose that way, and over time it has expanded as more men have realised the implications of the law, of society, of social media, of social expectations and constructs, of how men are treated, of hypocrisy etc. Such things take time…
/r/MensRights21/10/23 05:19 PM
1

Ok. If you ask "is there a gender pattern ... a bunch of nerdy looking white, Asian and Indian boys" it sounds a little like a complaint. I apologise if not. Are you trying to highlight that men are better at STEM stuff? The general perspective is men are interested in things (thus engineering, maths, building, computing, programming, analytical modelling etc) while women are interested in people. What might be interesting to see is if there would be any difference with a woman doing the people …
/r/MensRights21/10/23 05:13 PM
0

If it was fair and transparent, and based on clearly delineated outcomes in the hackathon, are you claiming that the objective and principled victory through merit should be upended for equity purposes?
/r/MensRights21/10/23 04:15 PM
22

And anything else you want to do.
/r/MensRights21/10/23 04:07 PM
2

Thank you
/r/MensRights21/10/23 04:06 PM
2

k
/r/MensRights21/10/23 04:06 PM
20

Sounds like we are not only thinking things exactly the same way but our lives seem to have paralleled nearly precisely. But I do recognise that a number of men really need people to interact with, to discuss their issues, and that’s where the forums came in
/r/MensRights21/10/23 01:33 PM
9

Understand exactly what you’re saying about PUA and I don’t see them anymore - I think I’m using that as alternative jargon for the 666 Chads of today who are in demand. My bad.
/r/MensRights21/10/23 01:29 PM
9

Eventually. Problem is that over 50% of marriages fail and 80% of the others are miserable. And 80% of divorces are by women who got bored- and yet nearly every one of those marriages was a commitment to lifelong trust and monogamy and love. Bottom line is, there is no characteristic or trait that anyone can look at and say - that one’s a keeper and so am I so therefore this might work. On that basis, I don’t think men and women should trust each other nor expect trust. Nor should anyone ever be…
/r/MensRights21/10/23 12:27 PM
15

That’s what MGTOW is. Men who merely step away. But men also need connections and men aren’t very good at building communities. Men also have problems, and they found internet forums that would help them. It was only when people started claiming MGTOW was a fascist, extremist, terroristic movement that others ever heard about it - because it wasn’t glorified by people who had GTOW. I was merely providing a rationale behind how the process of thinking arises for men. It is very rational. And we d…
/r/MensRights21/10/23 11:34 AM
1

And the ones who don't ask aren't aware their wife got pregnant by someone else. Paternity tests provide clarity and long-term stability
/r/MensRights21/10/23 11:15 AM
1

They see their own future bank balance.
/r/MensRights21/10/23 11:14 AM
1

Naughty
/r/MensRights21/10/23 11:11 AM
2

That type of stuff is absolutely crazy. Sorting it out at birth prevents all those long term problems
/r/MensRights21/10/23 11:10 AM
0

If you had actually raised what your issue was in the first place, instead of a pathetic rage bait "Equity is better in some instances tbh" then there could have been a good conversation. But you chose to ignore answering the question "In which instances, and then why for each instance?" That's a pathetic unprincipled method of argument. And you then later whine with "Bit arrogant to suggest I haven’t thought about it when you haven’t thought about it" after you had not bothered responding. What…
/r/MensRights21/10/23 11:07 AM
1

Leaving women to themselves
/r/MensRights21/10/23 09:03 AM
1

infidelity has always been with us. The demand that women should be trusted, always, without evidence is the issue. Women feeling slighted and leaving because their guy demanded a paternity test that they argued vociferously against shows a red flag where men should happily leave them “Waaah, you don’t trust me? I’m leaving” is a really weak rationale for ending a relationship. Most women utilise and develop a persona of men not being able to trust them in order that their men will “try harder”,…
/r/MensRights21/10/23 08:47 AM
3

It’s a very vindictive and emotionally laden statement to offer something for discussion while labelling it paedophilic up front. Even if I agree with you that that is what it is. Ins different case in UK, an adult woman initiated sexual contact with a 13yo boy without having any indication of knowing him or his friend and not being invited. That was a power play and attempted grooming. It’s horrific. She should have received the same sentence as any man would. The idea she got a 14 month senten…
/r/MensRights20/10/23 07:09 PM
1

The only people asking are those who have doubts already. It's not paranoia, it's not jealousy, it's something you are doing that is shady as shit. And we know, of those who harbor doubts based on the personality and the actions of their girl, between 1 in 2 and 1 in 3 kids isn't theirs. And there is evidence through the whole of time that women are great at lying, and great at denial. All that men want is absolute certainty about their kid. And if they can get rid of their woman while having a …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/23 06:04 PM
2

And if there is a demand for DMs, it stands to reason there is a shop for DMs. No one would deny the right for DMs. So if there is a paternity fraud issue in society, it stands to reason there should be the ability to prove paternity. No one should deny the right to paternity proof.
/r/MensRights20/10/23 02:04 PM
0

Interesting you haven’t responded. Maybe you are still thinking about it. Is there a valid equity rationale for women to not contribute 50% on any of those things if they demand men do 50% of household chores. On finance, if you use up or spend 50% of what the household uses, under feminism and equality, why would you not contribute 50%? Equity provides reparations because someone is inherently disadvantaged. What disadvantage do women have that means men should pay more than women just for the …
/r/MensRights20/10/23 02:01 PM
4

Suspect. Have some doubts. Want absolute assurance. Desire it not to be yours. Desire it to be yours. Have to pay for it for 18 years. There may be many reasons for a man to need to know. It is not about “already know something is up”, it is about clarity and evidence.
/r/MensRights20/10/23 08:15 AM
3

What are the precise signs, characteristics, traits etc that indicate a person will cheat, be deceptive, or is just looking for the bag through divorce?
/r/MensRights20/10/23 07:33 AM
2

In which instances, and then why for each instance?
/r/MensRights20/10/23 07:30 AM
14

k
/r/MensRights19/10/23 07:42 PM
18

Wow, you're salty. "There are always people who will refuse to participate in random studies. This isn’t a problem if those who refuse are no different from those who do participate, but it would certainly be a problem for a study of this kind, because women with doubts about who fathered their children would be the most likely to find reasons not to participate." https://insidestory.org.au/the-fatherhood-myth/ - from a bloke who tried to debunk the numbers in 2011 but could only find informatio…
/r/MensRights19/10/23 07:41 PM
9

lol
/r/MensRights19/10/23 07:14 PM
26

Here's an example from just an hour ago - https://www.reddit.com/r/AITAH/comments/17bpb1m/aitah_for_fighting_for_equal_custody_from_my_gf/ ​ He asked for a paternity test and she left him because she felt slighted (ie stigma).
/r/MensRights19/10/23 07:10 PM
32

The stigma that women feel when a guy asks for a paternity test and they see it as the guy not trusting them. It's all over Reddit in relation to these aspects. You may be misinterpreting stigma.
/r/MensRights19/10/23 07:07 PM
10

Except for the millions of years when we didn't have paternity tests? /s ​ Yep. Maybe if they weren't so promiscuous the issue would never have arisen
/r/MensRights19/10/23 06:50 PM
38

To remove all stigma from anyone and everyone who may question if they are the father. Provides evidence.
/r/MensRights19/10/23 06:23 PM
40

It shines a light on the fact that there is no characteristic or trait that men can confirm and therefore say confidently “my wife/gf would never do that”. There is no rationale for trusting a woman even though they demand that trust that gives them the ability to do what they wish. Without cast iron evidence they deny and shame /guilt those who question. Then when caught they use crocodile tears to keep hold of the man and claim it was a silly mistake and would never happen again. Falsely. Is i…
/r/MensRights19/10/23 05:34 PM
21

Impossible to tell what the actual rate is - women who have been unfaithful would refuse to speak truth in a survey and refuse to undergo DNA tests for research purposes. They prefer not to find out themselves because it shines a bright light of evidence on their infidelity and they couldn’t have that. They prefer to live with the lie and hope to never get caught.
/r/MensRights19/10/23 05:29 PM
1

Dad bods aren’t nice at all. And I used to have one. Daily hated my gut being pushed up and rolling over my trousers’ waistband. And jowls on my cheeks. Men are not usually naturally attractive, but a way for every man to be ugly is to be fat. Just take Johnny Depp or Elvis. It’s natural as we get older and we like to accept it as “it’s natural as you get older”. Nah. It’s because we get our feet under the table and get lazy.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/23 05:27 PM
4

It can be put the other way. “Women don’t have rights to have children” In that perspective, any pregnancy could be concluded to be a two yes’s requirement where both agree to the pregnancy There is no right to IVF for men or women who are infertile. In UK, the National Health Service currently provides it. No more. Private only, pay up. Paternity fraud should be criminalised. Any man having paid for what he thought was his child but finds out later the child was someone else’s is entitled to th…
/r/MensRights19/10/23 05:04 PM
–

Old, old data. I’ve given you more uptodate data based on more recent DNA testing by those who question. 30% aren’t the father. If you have doubts, nearly a 1 in 3 chance your doubts are corroborated. In every 3 children where there are doubts, 1 is fathered by someone else. And many men find out much later in life, like when they want to give blood to save “their” child. Can’t trust women nowadays and no way to know which ones can be trusted.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/23 04:22 PM
–

Guess what - 70% + 30% = 100% When people question it, there is a 30% chance they are right. That means there are a lot of women screwing around and getting pregnant by someone else. It’s also only the ones who get a paternity test. No more do men “believe all women”. We can only believe the ones telling the truth - but it’s impossible to know who they are because women are so good at lying. Damn, you women have gotten yourselves into a right pickle. No wonder men are walking away in their drove…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/23 04:16 PM
70

It was a random 5000 sample of all the DNA tests taken by those men who were questioning whether they were the father. But the real question is, “why should we BELIEVE ALL WOMEN when this is happening?” And should paternity testing become mandatory, thus ensuring there is no paternity fraud AND hold the actual parents accountable.
/r/MensRights19/10/23 04:11 PM
-1

When someone states “thought to be” it is a clear indication that this is an “expected” number that is being bandied about by others, but is not necessarily deemed to be accurate. I think you need to take lessons in how not to react like an ass. Source : https://dnatesting.com/30-of-men-not-the-father/ Do you have a source for your claim of what “the real figure” is? Separately if some people do believe the 40% irrespective of its veracity, men will demand paternity tests. Get ready ladies. Or j…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/23 02:18 PM
0

Given 30% of children currently born are thought to be fathered by someone else, evidence and objectivity should be required in all cases to prove paternity. Take it out from the man-woman relationship sphere and make it mandatory at birth then there is no accusation of cheating nor of reduced relationship trust on either part. It has become clear that “believe all women” is merely a desire that women want but it is impossible to tell which women are telling the truth and which are not.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/23 12:31 PM
1

No idea why truth and facts get such negative responses. Many people here clearly don’t understand the concepts of personal responsibility and red pill. If you fuck around, you find out. Red pill gives you an understanding of reality and you have no option but to live within that reality. Every time you stick your dick in that hole, you take full responsibility for the outcome. And in many countries it is even true if you are raped by the woman. First you must demand DNA evidence it is your chil…
/r/MensRights19/10/23 12:11 PM
2

Yep. Professional escorts and choose judiciously. Once a month or more if you can afford it.
/r/MensRights18/10/23 03:59 PM
2

I could disagree with small parts but why bother, when much of it and your overall conclusion is what I agree with. Sandman just did a video with Landman regarding a “MGTOW town” just north of Houston. I can see that type of stuff taking off - simple, cheap, off the beaten track living where men with different skills come together and develop a community that delivers everything except women. And their skills are provided in a barter style environment, out of reach of Government tax demands. The…
/r/MensRights18/10/23 01:13 PM
2

Disagree that “women are raised to be support players …” but agree they need to brought up under an equality basis. Problem is our upbringing is about understanding who can hurt you and being able to deal with it, developing your aggression and fearlessness, and then knowing you could utilise that but won’t until it is absolutely needed. This is fostered through make puberty. Can’t teach that. Women have a different leadership style - communistic and group based, feelings and wellness, until the…
/r/MensRights17/10/23 09:02 PM
1

Apologies. I misread your post and thought you were promoting the concept of toxic masculinity. My bad. Feminism for equality is warranted. Russia promotes that 100%, via its constitution and in practice. It also recognises that birth rate is important alongside family so it promotes that. India has a way to go, but I think that’s more about general poverty but some of the States do have some rural and nasty non-equality biases. Feminism for power is a drug for women though. They sell them the e…
/r/MensRights17/10/23 08:24 PM
1

Your conclusion was exactly where I came to. My issue seems to be a “class” one in reality. There is an elite that sucks the life out of everyone and is keen to ensure there is division - through media and politics - that gets the people against each other and there’s only one winner. Now this is certainly not a communism rant - that particular issue is exactly where I perceive the west is right now. But there is hate and division. There was an absolute need for equality, diversity and inclusion…
/r/MensRights17/10/23 08:15 PM
1

Everywhere has the same problems if they are implementing it in this way and/or under pressure from the West to do what the West does otherwise they will be regime-changed. Trudeau is particularly happy with the idea of meddling in other peoples business, as are Biden, the EU, Australia, NATO, UN and my own country, UK. Toxic masculinity? The only toxic masculinity is when women believe they are asserting a masculine frame and they call it “being masculine” but they do not understand the boundar…
/r/MensRights17/10/23 02:50 PM
1

Ignorance seems to be bliss for you. Ok.
/r/MensRights17/10/23 12:29 PM
2

Finally you raise damn good points. Reddit is global, not just USA. People are global, not just USA. The more that YSA teaches their citizens to believe that they are the only ones that matter, the harder will be their fall when it happens.
/r/MensRights17/10/23 07:39 AM
1

I never said women are lazy or stupid. I never mentioned home chores. You did. I think you may need some therapy. The women I talked about are hardworking, intelligent and doing well in their careers because they are damn good at it. But they end up alone because they can’t juggle both career with personal life. The successful ones wait too long and can no longer bear children. And they spend frivolously, preferring to see immediate glitter rather than long term gold. So, few have savings. They …
/r/MensRights17/10/23 07:37 AM
4

The post in the link was from a woman in Turkey not USA. She was scammed, Turkey does not have a Islamic marriage. But if she wants to join Islam, that’s her prerogative. She can choose her beliefs. Islam isn’t a problem for America - you should look at your politicians for the source of all your problems
/r/MensRights16/10/23 09:06 PM
1

Not convinced. At all. There are so many videos now from older single childless women who decry how they treated people when they were younger and hate that they were indoctrinated to hate men or always look for better. Then they hit the proverbial wall and it was … game over
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/23 08:20 PM
2

How low have you tried? A lot of red pillers demand women lower their standards, but maybe there’s a lot of men who need to lower theirs too. There’s just as many Incel women under 30 as Incel men. They might enjoy the attention- if you can settle
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/23 08:03 PM
1

Let it happen. All this over emotional “men” brought up by single moms without any masculine frame will shit the bed and women will realise they only have the choice of complete douchebags. Cos the top 20% don’t play with commitment in general or are taken by nice women, the 20% feminine men are douchebags, and the 60% masculine and principled objective MGTOW are, well, MGTOW
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/23 08:00 PM
3

Let them have it. And walk away. Develop your skills and trades. And charge an absolute fortune that really hurts them when they want your real skills. And refuse to work for a corporation with your skills unless they are paying you what you are worth. If they want to pay less they will have to employ women to do those labor intensive, manual , skilled trades. And their society will crumble.
/r/MensRights16/10/23 07:55 PM
11

Her problem is there is no such thing as an Islamic marriage in Turkey, it’s not recognised. She was naive. Possibly gold digging. And she is stuck in a country she doesn’t know and doesn’t speak the language. Not the best way to live your life. I have no sympathy for passport gals who still demand the bag in a foreign country. She needs to see an imam and find out if she has a leg to stand on or if she is in trouble
/r/MensRights16/10/23 07:45 PM
7

No idea why you are commenting in such a way. You just wanted to rant with your bias and hate about Islam when you aren’t even covered by the religion. The nicest people I have met at either Muslims or Hindus. So what if they wish to live their lives different to you? Live and let live
/r/MensRights16/10/23 07:41 PM
1

It resonates with a lot of people I know. It’s a process. I was observant enough to notice it when I was a teen and made a conscious decision - MGTOW came around 20 years later and started putting a philosophical perspective around it all. Made perfect sense.
/r/MensRights16/10/23 07:33 PM
10

Your example is so rare (ie an exception) that it is hardly worth writing what you write. However ... I think it will become more common. The current environment is that women in general (please take that as I meant it, I'm not talking unicorns or mormons) believe in this phase of complete strong and independent woman life. But we are seeing them reach their 40s and 50s with nothing. And they're crying about how life is unfair and they are invisible, while a few accept their own accountability t…
/r/MensRights16/10/23 06:11 PM
4

Hope it keeps working out for you man.
/r/MensRights16/10/23 06:05 PM
4

When did you marry? Did you look down on the MGTOW who were trying to tell you "don't do it", because you knew best? I knew in 1982 when I saw every family around me and all my friends' parents' marriages had fallen apart - marriage is a death curse on society, and it was never going to be for me. But I wanted kids - so I got them. No such term as MGTOW back then. Nor red pill. I was still a weak ass idiot, but I knew what my purpose and overall principles were.
/r/MensRights16/10/23 06:03 PM
9

The concept of marriage is solely for the Disney Princes. They will be slaughtered during it, having never developed an understanding that it is a concept that ONLY guarantees men are chopped down. Crowder found out. Depp found out. Harvey found out. Smith found out. Many countless millions of others found out. But if there's anything more brighter blue pill than a so-called red-piller promoting traditional 1950s style marriage in today's day and age, I have not found it. There are many alternat…
/r/MensRights16/10/23 05:57 PM
1

"Ultimately its hard for women to find a decent man because most men are bad people and undesirable." ​ Hate is the most undesirable trait in the human race. And you exude it. Buy a cat.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/23 04:52 PM
7

I think your sister's idea of IT is data input. She seems a little thick.
/r/MensRights16/10/23 04:50 PM
1

Okay. I will await your evidence for the claim about traditional marriages. Considering they are the ones that all led to divorce throughout the 70s and 80s, your claim seems very unlikely. But don't confuse your position with red pill regarding today's society. What you're proposing is previous society's blue pill.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/23 08:12 PM
1

Cool. I hope it is everlasting for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/23 08:01 PM
1

Everyone who gets shafted wants sympathy. It's a standard human trait. But in this case of today's society, there is no excuse for not understanding the pitfalls. But if one refuses to see the risks, and openly lambasts those who try to help them in advance, and they choose not to mitigate against those very real risks, they can only take personal accountability RP is about understanding reality and doing what you can to protect yourself from getting completely shafted. Standard risk assessment …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/23 08:00 PM
0

Every happily married guy says that ... until they find out they are not actually happily married (ask Crowder, Smith, Harvey or countless millions of others) Then they get shafted and become MRAs, demanding changes to the court system when previously they ridiculed these men as neanderthals, abusers, criminals, whiners, rapists and trad cons living in a patriarchal mindset who didn't understand that the world has changed You do you, brother. I sincerely hope you and your wife are one of the 20%…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/23 07:41 PM
0

It's 1950s blue pill bull. The red pill is about understanding reality as it is and highlights the pitfalls of continuing the old societal standards (such as marriage). Red pill is about understanding that danger and protecting yourself from it. Anyone advocating a return to traditional marriage nowadays is definitely not red pill despite what the so-called RP influencers say. Anyone getting married in today's day and age, especially without a prenup, gets no sympathy from me. Anyone promoting t…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/23 07:12 PM
0

Unless and until she falsely accuses you of SA and physical and emotional abuse, along with coercion, including treating the children badly and being a drunk. Then you become an MRA advocate. This is how the divorce lawyers highlight what these women do to get the outcome they demand - as much of the assets and money as possible, ongoing, and the kids 100%. I perceive it is a complete boredom issue (who wouldn't be bored if their only purpose in life was to look after the children and clean the …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/23 07:05 PM
2

Agree with your start (the nastiest and least compromising people in a divorce being SAHMs is evidenced by experts in the matter, such as divorce lawyers) I agree with your end conclusion, as that is also my opinion on how to deal with it (if you are silly enough to ever get married). Better is to have a good prenup. Best is not to get married, sign up to a Commitment Ceremony instead. Unless your wife to be earns much more than you and wants to be the breadwinner - then she can pay you off mont…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/23 06:59 PM
1

Completely agree. There are forestry charities around me who need free help to clear old trees, fell them, move them etc. It is only men who do this, hard labour like being on a prison chain gang. For zero pay. Do not do it. The only reason to do this is if you are an apprentice in this area trying to get work experience, you need the opportunity to do this and get a reference, in order to do it as a career and then get paid. Do not give the landlords and elites your free manual labour.
/r/MensRights15/10/23 11:41 AM
1

I think you need a cape and a mask. And a fantastic name. Then go and sit in dark corners watching all the scumbags scurry around. Then beat them up based on their gender, because you saw something once and someone said it happens all the time. How about WonderPimp?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/23 10:54 AM
5

I’m a bit confused. Under US health insurance, don’t you only get coverage after you have paid the first x hundred dollars? Or is this a Medicaid issue?
/r/MensRights15/10/23 10:45 AM
6

This is so out of whack. She must be hanging out with some real skanky men. And then there's innocent until proven guilty. Women lie. All day, Every day. They should be held to the same standards as men in relation to any and every claim they make. And men should be treated the same as women: "Young man, you've been found guilty of murder. I sentence you to 6 hours community service and a fine of $25. Don't do it again."
/r/MensRights13/10/23 09:02 PM
1

Please go to the training and stealth record it, at minimum audio only. Put it on YouTube under a pseudonym.
/r/MensRights13/10/23 11:24 AM
1

Just like the trope you are attempting to argue against, you use bias, conjecture, assumption and anecdote to help give your belief a foundation that is nothing but a fictional hypothesis. While the truth is that you have no idea what the truth is. Seeing as you are in college, why don't you take a stats course, develop an unbiased survey, ensure you have a good hypothesis to test, make sure those answering your questions are a true cross-section of society and can represent the population, and …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/23 07:17 PM
1

Some men will shag whoever they can find accepts them; when some men find someone they can get with, they will settle for it rather than continue looking for better. Such men prefer some kind of bond in their life rather than having no one; women seem to prefer being single and possibly lonely
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/23 03:32 AM
2

Some great, some ok, some not so good. Just like with blokes. None of it to do with gender but with competence in managing people. What has been interesting is most of the women were single or divorced, unable to find someone long term, and they were quite sad in their personal lives.
/r/MensRights10/10/23 03:14 AM
-1

Incorrect again. The value that is attained by men competing means every man advances and becomes the best they can be. Except those that wish to be like women. There is a lot wrong with society, but none of that is down to men trying to be better. You're reaching and making ish up. A woman's value comes from whatever other people say their value comes from. Women have immense amounts of privilege that they only ever warranted when they were protected by men. Now that men do not need to offer th…
/r/MensRights09/10/23 08:33 PM
1

It's just your social media choosing which things for you to watch. The Red Pill is about understanding reality and reacting appropriately to it. Many RP "influencers", both men and women, are just grifters who lay on the emotional patter to bring home the money from the guys who feel bruised. It's easy to be a televangelist if you're a good snake-oil salesman offering emotional outlets and arguments, but in reality most RP influencers are super blue pill. Some of the things in your list are tru…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/23 08:00 PM
2

It's amazing what you can do on an an average income on your own if you're careful. Been a single dad for the past 28 years, my youngest being 16 now. Own my own home outright, car, two motorbikes, not a cent in debt, a retirement income to come of around the current average wage each year until I die, and two fantastic lads. Didn't live the fancy lifestyle, unlike my older brother who has nothing, no job and no retirement funds. It's all about choices.
/r/MensRights09/10/23 07:54 PM
47

You just gotta wonder. lol.
/r/MensRights09/10/23 07:50 PM
53

Weekly manicures and hairdresser appointments and waxing, tons of make up, perfume, hundreds of different smelling products, £3k handbags, new wardrobe every month, 75 pairs of shoes, top end iPhone, heating on already, top tier of Tinder and Bumble, monthly subscriptions on apps and services, Cosmopolitan delivered monthly, and restaurants and clubbing weekly. It all adds up to living paycheck to paycheck. Gotta feel sorry for them. I don't know how they do it all, on top of their $100k student…
/r/MensRights09/10/23 07:49 PM
-1

Everything you write I would disagree with completely. Men have zero value until they prove their value and that comes solely through competition and hierarchy and fighting the odds. We all have something we deliver excellently, and we all just need to find it. Everything you wrote suggests to me that you didn’t have an upbringing where you were able to develop your masculine traits, and you prefer to make men into women. The opposite is true. Men don’t need social validation, they need recognit…
/r/MensRights09/10/23 06:59 PM
1

Anyone can reject anyone for any reason. It’s preference - you lost weight, you’re now attractive; you rejected me before, I’m now getting my revenge (that may not be a healthy perspective though). If someone rejected them previously and they were nasty to them with their reason, there’s every reason to keep a healthy distance from such people at all times. There have been plenty of large women I have admitted would be very good looking if they lost weight, but they would need to lose that weigh…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/23 03:09 PM
1

A lot of this is because men understand that it is their own personal responsibility to determine their life’s direction. Generally we push ourselves to overcome adversity and expect no help in doing so. We are not very good at communities or groups and are often solo. So we sort out our own problems. And those that do not or cannot are seen as not achieving the minimum requirements of manhood. Which often arises because they may not have had a father who ensured they take full responsibility fo…
/r/MensRights09/10/23 02:48 PM
0

Read the whole post. Then tell me you’re sure there’s truth to the particular line you picked out. Oh no. You will accept it as true. It fits your narrative that every man is a rapist and abuser and is violent. I ignored that bit due to its ridiculousness. No man ever bragged to anyone about planning to rape someone. This is a post by a woman pretending to be a man on a forum
/r/MensRights05/10/23 05:21 AM
4

So you thought it would help you to get the women if you impugned the characters of everyone else, but it backfired and the women sought out those “bad boys”. This is all gossip, emotionally based, manipulative, SIGN language and not masculine. It’s how teenage girls at school act - and they never grow out of it. I’m not sure what you’re expecting.
/r/MensRights04/10/23 07:51 AM
8

Patriarchy definition - "Man bad, everything bad men fault, reeeeee" The definition of misogyny is very much the same.
/r/MensRights03/10/23 06:28 PM
1

In nearly every marriage, both the man and woman determined they would be together forever. They had deemed the others’ flaws were acceptable. And in well over 50%, that was untrue as a divorce ensued. So yes - “eventually” the signs are there, but unfortunately the marriage had already occurred. Make of it what you will. Men are being deemed a predator or harasser, solely because of their sex and because they may want to approach women they find attractive and shoot their shot on the off chance…
/r/MensRights02/10/23 11:47 AM
1

Haha. Welcome to the start of your pill journey. Which one will you take? You now know what this person is like, and you also know what the man haters are like. And they control the media and society. How will you ever know whether a woman is the former or the latter? You do know women act and lie to get what they want. It’s why over 50% marriages fail and another 40%+ are unhappy. Enjoy being a man, lol
/r/MensRights01/10/23 02:47 PM
1

Nah. It’s fantasy. Wonder Woman and the Bionic Woman were the same back in the 80s. I don’t know how many women think it’s true, lol
/r/MensRights30/09/23 05:40 PM
14

When have you ever seen a woman in public without makeup? You made a great point.
/r/MensRights30/09/23 09:21 AM
11

Shooting your shot is over. No approaching, no jokes, no asking for a number or if you buy them a drink, no talking to them. You don’t know if it is unwanted or not but you cannot risk that it is and you will be vilified or criminalised. Stay away.
/r/MensRights30/09/23 09:20 AM
17

I’m the same. I stopped all interactions 16 years ago after my 2nd lad was born - no more being trapped thanks. Twice was enough. Now I get hit on and I ignore it completely. Life is simple, rational, logical, unchaotic and contented. Zero debts, many assets and a good retirement fund that’s growing. And my two lads will inherit it all. No one else.
/r/MensRights30/09/23 09:18 AM
9

And they end up on OF and Instagram and X and TikTok to get their validation from every man they would never accept. Catch 22. Men have left the building.
/r/MensRights30/09/23 09:14 AM
1

I have zero compassion for any man that gets married nowadays who has not protected himself. All the information is available not to get caught like that. If you get shafted, you have only yourself to blame. The only ones who do that nowadays look down in those who stay single - until they get graped in the divorce. Personal responsibility is a key masculine trait. Ignoring objective information to the extent of ridiculing the deliverer of such facts is not a masculine trait.
/r/MensRights29/09/23 08:15 PM
1

Unfortunately some women found out. And demanded to join. So the sheds closed down. It’s really bad out there.
/r/MensRights29/09/23 08:10 PM
4

It’s precisely what it is. And they really don’t like that - they being women, simp and beta men, and governments. It doesn’t mean stay away from women, but it may have to end up that way with how things are going
/r/MensRights29/09/23 08:08 PM
1

Stop focusing on women. Focus on self. Be the best man you can be. Don’t be a woman with a dick. Open a Reddit for complaining about misandry to Ofcom. Every misandrist comment in an advert or on tv or in the news, everyone sends in a complaint. Get organised. Refuse to be alone with a woman anywhere unless it is recorded. Wear a mask everywhere in public. I heard Ava Evans did a tweet stating she finds it the best protection against the worst virus - men. Reverse it. Go your own way. Understand…
/r/MensRights29/09/23 08:00 PM
15

Just keep away from all women at all times. The only safe thing for men to do is use a professional once or twice a month. Anything else is verboten. By the way, “unwanted” only applies to the lower 90% of men. And whatever you do, do not EVER fall for the 30+ woman that suddenly decides you require live bombing. They will destroy your life if you fall for it. Leave them to their single life, and let them screw over the simps or cry about there being no good men. There’s plenty of simps you can …
/r/MensRights29/09/23 07:42 PM
2

That’s because it is those topics that get clicks, get peoples ire up (because men must be manly and be. In the top 10%), and means people get paid. You can’t judge based solely on what you see on YT, and certainly cannot take Instagram seriously. Try Aaron Clarey
/r/MensRights28/09/23 05:21 PM
0

You should push for an Anti-Nazi Minister.
/r/MensRights28/09/23 04:26 PM
2

Men’s Rights are not solely about dating, but they are about lack of equality with regard to women. Men’s issues are not just about women either. They are about education, social constructs, lack of value, suicide, false accusations, lack of principles, prison sentencing, presumption of guilt, finance, purpose, merit, logic and biased legislation among others. I suggest you look wider.
/r/MensRights28/09/23 04:04 PM
2

I can see exactly where you’re coming from. I remember being a mid teen and my whole life revolved around popping my cherry. Once that was done, the day after my 16th birthday, the monkey was lifted. If it came along, great. If it didn’t, so be it. My goal was my own son, no women. Did that. Twice. Not looked for any kind of relationship for 15 years now. Never been so contented, and life is simple, logical and unchaotic. Both sons preferred living with me, so they did once they reached teenage.…
/r/MensRights26/09/23 09:48 PM
2

How old are you? And what attributes and assets do you have? Men usually don’t come into their own until mid-30s. And why do they then get chosen? Because they got beta bucks, they get manipulated and married, they get 2 kids, and then they get completely shafted because they chose that first woman that came long pretending to really like them. You have money and assets? You need to be really careful. But if you’re lonely right now, get some friends and hobbies and keep busy. Get fit. Don’t go c…
/r/MensRights26/09/23 07:15 PM
2

It’s only a favourable situation for the girls that are “acceptable “. Just as many women are incels below 30 as men, and then post 40, men have the advantage. But the average man is up against a hypergamy driven and highly objectifying female dynamic that means most men are invisible to the women they deem attractive. They refuse to accept they sexually objectify men too. Overall, I think the majority of men have it much worse but I do acknowledge there are a large minority of women who have it…
/r/MensRights26/09/23 05:09 PM
3

No. I have as much right to be there as they do. There’s no accusation they can make if I don’t make eye contact and just carry on going while making sure I do t touch them or bump into them. I will not get out of their way if there is a group - they can learn to share space
/r/MensRights26/09/23 04:46 PM
0

Incorrect. There’s nothing misogynistic about recognising different traits across genders. There’s no hate there towards women and I am very accepting of the way women are. When a man acts like this though, trying to blame a woman for protecting herself for his hurt feelings and where I am letting him know he has no reason to have hurt feelings or take victim status, and accuse me of misogyny, is some weird take. Bravo.
/r/MensRights26/09/23 03:50 PM
1

Mere bloviation from someone who does not understand why what they did was try to restrict someone else’s actions and claim victim status. Grow up. You’re acting like a child 👧
/r/MensRights26/09/23 11:54 AM
-1

I think you have a problem in understanding sex, sexuality, gender, social constructs, stoicism and adulting. I don’t know you to like you. What you showed was weakness and feminine traits - all humans have both masculine and feminine traits. You merely decided to go on Reddit and claim your feminine traits were being abused by a woman who never abused you or did anything. She didn’t call you creepy - you assumed it. She didn’t prevent you walking to your car - she took herself out of the situat…
/r/MensRights25/09/23 12:30 PM
-1

You can be as you wish. But with that bull, you sound more like a woman every day. Were you brought up with a father? She didn’t like you and got out of the situation. Why are you getting so butthurt that she felt she needed to hide from you in a shop? You have no rights in this situation. You cannot demand anyone likes you. FFS 🤦‍♂️
/r/MensRights25/09/23 03:01 AM
3

If I were you, I’d apologise to incels too. About 30% -50% of men and 30% women under 30 in America are involuntary celibates. That’s some 20m-30m in America alone, without taking account of anyone over 30. Many people you know but ignore are included. All the tripe about incels comes from media portrayals based on the 40k worldwide men on the incel forums. They are an extreme end, or some of them are. Much like eating disorder or self harm groups have some nutters trying to keep people inside. …
/r/MensRights24/09/23 11:16 PM
-3

You should have said “As a weakass photographer who doesn’t know when to ask permission or let people know why I am wing a telephoto lens at crowds of children on a beach, …”
/r/MensRights24/09/23 10:42 PM
-2

I mean, stop acting like a woman. Someone reacted to you, didn’t like you for whatever reason, and you’re here moaning about the right to walk to your car. It’s a non-sequitur and is very feminine. You’re using SIGN language. Stop that.
/r/MensRights24/09/23 10:38 PM
-11

In those circumstances you are hit at risk of being accused by others. You’re arguing like a woman. Stop it
/r/MensRights24/09/23 12:43 PM
-12

Men and women are different. No matter what women say
/r/MensRights24/09/23 12:42 PM
-21

FFS! The man is protecting his business and the children in his charge as a guardian. This is not a feminist aspect, this is a very male and masculine aspect. What you were doing was very intrusive and very suspect, aimed at children, with a telephoto lens.
/r/MensRights24/09/23 10:11 AM
-40

You haven’t been falsely accused. You haven’t been refused the right to walk to your car, use your car or park your car. You sound really weak though. She may have found you creepy though. I might find you creepy. I have the right to like or dislike anyone for any reason. You were chatting to her about the workout. Did she invite you to chat to her or walk with her? She did not demand you walk faster or slower. She took action and removed herself by going into the store. Her reason was to get aw…
/r/MensRights24/09/23 10:07 AM
1

Agree
/r/MensRights21/09/23 10:05 AM
117

He should note down the evidence and raise it as an Equality issue. Sue the school if they don't crack down on it
/r/MensRights20/09/23 09:18 PM
54

Absolutely. Until the child is proven to be mine, it is not mine. Innocent until proven guilty. Get me that paternity test and we will then find out. Every man should do this if they have the slightest doubts
/r/MensRights18/09/23 04:07 PM
3

I never thought I would ever proclaim abstinence as the only way to stay ahead in life. The juice is no longer worth the squeeze. Pay for it once a month with a professional and just have lots of friends, but forget the benefits. There are none.
/r/MensRights18/09/23 04:05 PM
1

r\Britain just had a thread by a woman complaining that her husband is an Andrew Tate fan and they have two daughters - she is concerned about how he will father them and should she divorce him. Then there are comments from the Mods stating that any “Tater Tots” contributing will be banned from the subreddit permanently. Reddit is toxic. You are not allowed to have a view that is different from the one allowed / so what is the point of Reddit? Isn’t its niche product value that people receive lo…
/r/MensRights17/09/23 07:33 PM
3

The concept of Incel was explained in research documents back before the turn of the century, dimwit. It is not gender specific, dimwit. Just because dimwits decided to try and explain Incel by aligning them to a forum that may be frequented by a massively small minority if invisible people is not my problem, dimwit. Just because you call it a community when it is merely a description of people who are socially ostracised by fucking dimwits like you isn’t my problem, dimwit. You’re a bigoted dim…
/r/MensRights17/09/23 09:59 AM
3

Your hate for people who merely are excluded from relationships in society is noted. Your bigoted and fictional perceptions are noted. Your scummy personality is laid bare for everyone to see. Bravo. Karma will be a bitch.
/r/MensRights17/09/23 06:37 AM
3

Men need to stop being concerned about how others see them. Go your own way. If that means listening to Rollo Tomassi, Andrew Tate, Jordan Peterson, Alex Jones, Joe Rogan, Jedediah Bila, Pearly, Better Bachelor, Aaron Clarey, Aba n Preach, Lapeef Network, the late Kevin Samuels, or Fresh n Fit, you do what you gotta do. Don’t let others sway you, but pick out the best bits and discard the shit. Respect those that deserve respect based on their actions, and accept equality and each individual has…
/r/MensRights16/09/23 09:51 PM
6

And that’s why you’re moronic. The super small “community” you speak of is not representative of the vast number of people who are incels that the post relates to. Using ChatGPT to produce a wall of text relating to the wrong thing is how to badly utilise the internet and prove a) you have no independent thought b) you know nothing about it c) you can’t work out rational conclusions d) you’re somewhat thick.
/r/MensRights16/09/23 09:43 PM
4

Now you’re just doubling down as a moron.
/r/MensRights16/09/23 09:29 PM
3

If you can’t see that men just want to be respected and not vilified, purely because if someone’s circumstances, then you are the major problem that the world does not need
/r/MensRights16/09/23 09:27 PM
2

Involuntary celibate - not gender specific - someone who wants but has not had an intimate relationship with anyone for (I think) 12 months At least 30% of both men and women below 30yo in America fall into this category. That’s about 20m of them just in USA. That’s a lot of dangerous, domestic terrorists. You can see it in the news daily with the highly publicised thousands of murders.
/r/MensRights16/09/23 09:25 PM
3

No one sane would ever want a woman like that as a partner. That’s why they end up being haters - they are used by the playas and spat out, used up and useless to anyone by 27
/r/MensRights16/09/23 09:21 PM
1

Not convinced by your argument there, but I understand the desire to deliver it lol.
/r/MensRights16/09/23 09:19 PM
3

What they want is validation that someone likes them for who they are and a relationship. The accusations against all Incels based on some very biased and inconsequentially insignificant data based on the most radicalised is like claiming all humans are terrorists. Or that all men are rapists and commit violence against women and children . Oh - feminists do that and have managed to persuade the world it is true. Including a load of men. Here’s a thought - any man who projects these stupid accus…
/r/MensRights16/09/23 09:18 PM
6

Complete bull shit from a bimbo that has no idea about involuntary celibacy and the impact it is having on hundreds of millions of men. You base your understanding on solely the very small numbers on the Incel forums. Which includes fences forums if the same type. You need to learn how not to be manipulated by media and special interest groups
/r/MensRights16/09/23 09:13 PM
6

You’ve been taken in by the media and anti-men method of vilifying a very large number of men, based on the 0.001% who are members of Incel forums. Only 40k men are in these forums worldwide, while there are at least 10m incels below 30yo in America alone. These are people who realise they have no sexual future and it is obviously debilitating and frustrating and contributes to high levels of loneliness, depression and suicide. And you jump on the bandwagon because you don’t understand anything …
/r/MensRights16/09/23 09:09 PM
2

But when the child is 18 and leaves and no more money coming in, she’ll get a Rude awakening
/r/MensRights16/09/23 07:52 PM
0

Yep, as long as he doesn’t adopt
/r/MensRights16/09/23 04:58 AM
3

People need to vent. And to hear other opinions. And to learn to be a man. Too many boys are growing up without a male role model and do not know anything other than the feminist frame that their mum and their teachers foisted on them. And just to be clear - you telling people not to complain about something they don’t like is an attempt to remove one of their rights - the right to freedom of expression. There’s a lot wrong with the world, always has been. What men do is act accordingly to the s…
/r/MensRights15/09/23 07:40 PM
0

With a good prenup, this isn’t an issue. They both earn the same. He will never be financially responsible for the kids if they divorce. They start off with 0 and build up over time and then buy a place etc etc. Everything pre marriage is clear, everything post Marriage is shared. As long as it is all fully acknowledged beforehand, why not? The only problem is the bedroom. She doesn’t like him. Can’t see her keeping up the arrangement
/r/MensRights15/09/23 05:06 PM
1

Free speech. They can say what they want. You can reply what you want. Or ignore the fat ugly goes and get in with life. They will suffer by their decisions and by being ugly on the inside. You can rise above that even if it doesn’t guarantee you get anything But men are crap at communities. And we speak straight while women speak crooked. They hate when we call them out for their bull shit and their lack of principles and hypocrisy. That’s why you go your own way.
/r/MensRights15/09/23 12:00 PM
2

Not true. You can say all that. It just depends who you say it to and how as to whether they react badly and by claiming victim status. Just smile and tell them they’re not your type
/r/MensRights15/09/23 11:45 AM
1

Get away from dating apps and only focus on girls you meet irl. Work on yourself solely and forget about chasing women if it’s not something you perceive you have the ability to overcome. You will hit your stride in your 30s as long as you keep physically fit and set up your life. Chasing after and Spending money on women early in life will guarantee many men do not meet their goals. Achieving your goals will naturally lead to a better lifestyle - where women will naturally notice you. But it’s …
/r/MensRights15/09/23 11:44 AM
4

The term Incel is being used as a projection for domestic terrorist. Considering 30% of American males under 30 are virgins, that means there are something like 10m male incels in that age bracket in America alone. There are many more women murderers of that age range right now in Prisons in America than the total number of victims of Incel murder ever. What’s more - the number of femcels is apparently even higher. And if you go to their forums, you will se they are no different in Their hate th…
/r/MensRights14/09/23 08:39 PM
-1

Lol 😂💯 Anyone who has a problem with this witty rejoinder is not a man. If you don’t understand this humour, don’t ever claim to be a man and don’t hang out with men. Because you will always be not a man. This is how men take the piss out of each other. All the time! And accepting and giving male banter and mickey-taking is what helps men to bond. If you don’t understand or accept this, please just keep away from men. Forever.
/r/MensRights14/09/23 11:24 AM
1

They’re not male. That is sex. At the moment your sex is immutable even though you can make yourself look different to represent the sex you want to appear to be. From a gender point of view, any adult can do or be what they want to be or appear to be. No problem. But I accept that may be a big problem to some women and to spaces that have been always kept separated by sex for safety purposes. So in that context, the problem for FTM people is that other women will see them as men. That means the…
/r/MensRights14/09/23 11:19 AM
-1

It actually was, originally.
/r/MensRights13/09/23 11:16 AM
-1

Get your own back. Find their make up and empty it all out, mixed up, inside their handbags. When they go moaning to your parents, tell your parents they are lucky you didn’t piss in their handbags but that is what you will do next time they assault you. Your mum will be appalled and wail. Your dad will admonish you but will be proud you stood up for yourself. And you will carry through with your threat. And you will tell them you will no longer put up with their shit because they will regret it…
/r/MensRights12/09/23 07:20 PM
4

The majority of the men’s influencers focus on sex aswell. It’s because these influencers have mostly come from the PUA scene or are good conversationalists. Have you noticed there are very few who focus on your average guy? They don’t help the majority of men, although advice to be the best you can be from a job point of view and to keep fit and athletic is good advice. We’re not all alphas. Neither are the influencers, though they want and often claim to be.
/r/MensRights12/09/23 07:07 PM
6

Glad someone else has noticed. Feminism was originally a movement about equality that also focused on class divides and had a focus on assuring economic equality. This soon changed when the middle class white women took over education completely throughout every area of the education system where they dropped class issues and produced all men as their foe.
/r/MensRights12/09/23 06:59 PM
5

If you’re not prepared to even try, then she will demand payment and you will be forced to pay. For her crime. For 18 years minimum. And she could accuse you of rape at any point. You have no choice - you need to report it before she falsely accuses you.
/r/MensRights12/09/23 01:59 PM
-1

Because it is her body and “he” impregnated her. Cause and effect. And consequences. What you are talking about is subsequent decisions after the fact. She gets to choose those decisions, not anyone else, but it is very clear that the father pays for the child. That’s why you don’t stick your twig into the hole - it could be a wasp nest in there. If you can’t control your pecker, you can’t (and have zero rights to) control the consequences of using your pecker. Personal responsibility.
/r/MensRights11/09/23 03:23 PM
12

Given how so few wish to enter the military now, and the way the West has truly screwed up diplomacy and forced other countries to be just as stupid as them, my bet is that National Service will return at some point in the next couple of decades. If you have access to the videos, you can see the way that Ukraine is trying to round up men on the streets and in churches to be sent to their nearly-certain death or life-altering injuries, and with little if any military training. And now they’re loo…
/r/MensRights11/09/23 02:50 PM
4

Don’t all serial killers post their conquest pics on Instagram? Next time you see her, at a very expensive restaurant date, tell her at the time of dessert, you cracked her Instagram for evidence she is not a serial gold-digger, but unfortunately you found she was. You have already paid your 50%. Then walk out.
/r/MensRights11/09/23 01:35 PM
-2

Personal responsibility. You did the deed, you must pay the consequences. It’s part of being a man. DNA tests must be mandatory, and only the actual or adopting father pays (proper, consensual adoption, not merely being the stepdad). Prior to that DNA requirement being in force, any man who Assumed the child was his but then finds out at any future point in time that the child is not his, he gets to step out of that arrangement and she should be subject to paying back all he has paid (subject to…
/r/MensRights11/09/23 01:31 PM
5

Calling the police would have been the right thing for you to do, but at your and her age, it would have gone nowhere and you would have been ridiculed and ostracised. But now you’re older (assuming it was a few years ago)? Do not let violent women get away with this. Their domestic violence must be stopped just as much as male domestic violence must be stopped. Get away from them and call immediately before they do it to you falsely
/r/MensRights11/09/23 01:12 PM
32

The main difference is “the draft“. Current military personnel enter by choice, and can be adult men, women or non-binary, or choose to transition while in the military. These people want to be there (or thought they did at the time of joining). Draft military is an imposition by the State on all those born male, irrespective of choices made later in life. It’s a duty the State puts on born males, but not on born females. Personally I wouldn’t want to be in a trench with anyone who you could not…
/r/MensRights11/09/23 01:07 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter