TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

CraftyDrac Archive

View 3 posts and 576 comments by CraftyDrac on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

it probably has a common sense clause or strict circumstances
/r/MensRights14/11/17 03:48 PM
3

There are no designated areas to play with dolls or building blocks. The toys have been strategically jumbled to create an environment for girls and boys to play together. Rather than encourage children to do particular things, the teachers are careful not to box children based on their gender or subtly discourage them from doing certain things. On one hand, this is a good idea The school has removed the terms "girl" and "boy" completely. Instead they make a deliberate effort to call each child …
/r/MensRights07/10/17 05:14 PM
1

The anti woman part is likely stems from red pillers that take part in this sub as there's an overlap there. redpill is like a frankenstein of mra, the idiot that started it said it to be a "mix of MRA and pickup culture" (see the first post on the redpill sub)
/r/MensRights27/09/17 07:39 AM
0

"pussypass" bullshit, the police only saw the man attacking the women - thats why they arrested the guy
/r/MensRights26/05/17 06:32 PM
2

Maybe you should educate yourself on the fact that without serious electoral reform no third party even has a ghost of a chance
/r/MensRights11/05/17 08:17 AM
0

Eh? Gender disphoria is currently classified as an illness.
/r/MensRights21/11/16 10:23 PM
1

Because a women totally has genitals to remove
/r/MensRights21/11/16 10:19 PM
0

Then why are you so focused on it being a mental illness? DSM-5 has gotten things wrong before
/r/MensRights21/11/16 06:46 PM
0

You're really digging into the notion that it's a mental illness on par with say schizophrenia, it's not.
/r/MensRights21/11/16 06:42 PM
1

Riiiiiiiight, because that's totally what transgenderism is
/r/MensRights21/11/16 06:30 PM
0

You mean like homosexuality used to be? and anorexia is a different medical field fyi
/r/MensRights21/11/16 06:13 PM
3

One of the looming conundrums that is affecting e-sports is the inclusion of mentally ill transsexuals to gender restricted tournaments. Jesus christ that guy is an asshole
/r/MensRights21/11/16 04:27 PM
2

There are dozens of airlines that won't sit men next to unaccompanied minors. Used to, it seems to have mostly been fixed after it spread
/r/MensRights19/11/16 08:47 PM
1

Basically, if any actual charges come up: lawyer up, the system is less broken then you would think, considering we mostly see edge cases here Otherwise ignore her and file a restraining order if she continues to harass (sidenote, John doe and Jane doe are common names to anonymise names, other generic names like matt also work)
/r/MensRights08/11/16 04:24 PM
3

So one game ruined all games? that's completely idiotic, plenty of good games out there that don't do this
/r/MensRights08/11/16 04:19 PM
2

TL:DR good intentions and logic turned into a massive mess that has no good intentions, nor any logic
/r/MensRights31/10/16 10:46 PM
2

The revealing part here is that is reads like someone who was raped, yet theres little to no justice that can be found here
/r/MensRights26/10/16 05:28 PM
1

Are you really comparing standing up for same-sex marriage to standing up for false accusations?
/r/MensRights26/10/16 05:16 PM
1

Most people here seem to not understand the question Why do people act like false rape accusers should get sympathy Simply put: "the justice system failed them"
/r/MensRights26/10/16 05:15 PM
1

Also hospital workers and permanent patients (i think, you do get a HIV vaccine)
/r/MensRights14/09/16 06:46 PM
3

cough
/r/MensRights03/09/16 03:45 PM
28

You really should have gotten training before being put on as a bouncer, because you clearly have the right to stop people from trespassing as an employee
/r/MensRights03/09/16 03:37 PM
4

What the actual fuck, i found an article from Salon that actually makes sense http://www.salon.com/2015/05/26/male_survivors_of_sexual_assault_need_help_too/
/r/MensRights30/08/16 05:36 PM
0

In undeveloped countries I'm estimating the problems are fairly gender unspecific, while both face different issues, the severity is fairly evenhanded
/r/MensRights25/08/16 10:17 PM
2

It's bureaucracy, not conspiracy. Yup, just felt like mentioning it If you mean soap, shampoo, conditionner and so on, it soons wanders into genuine luxury territory. Actually, hygiene is a different tax I think
/r/MensRights25/08/16 10:15 PM
2

Fully agree, with one exception: female hygiene products shouldn't be taxed as luxery
/r/MensRights25/08/16 07:39 PM
2

For those who say this is still too much information, I say just stick to "men are discriminated against in law" and if someone says 'in what ways,' point them to this quick list, which is a small sample of the inequality of men under law in the UK (and a fair reflection of what it is like for men throughout the West, though details will vary). I think we're misunderstanding eachother, I'm talking about "information overload" as in "too much in one picture" Something like this: http://imgur.com/…
/r/MensRights25/08/16 12:21 PM
1

Information overload, clear concise individual points with sourcing are much easier to take in for someone who isn't familiar with the MRA movement
/r/MensRights25/08/16 06:54 AM
0

A better approach would be to create an album with each point, with sources to back them up Separated their easier to share, source help get the point across
/r/MensRights24/08/16 07:27 AM
1

2:10 someone even helped assaulted the man
/r/MensRights15/08/16 12:46 PM
1

Well things are going better recently, check out gamergate
/r/MensRights06/08/16 01:07 PM
1

Not sure if this exactly, but there is a "stormfront or SJW" subreddit
/r/MensRights06/08/16 09:32 AM
1

Sadly, theres a large association due to the media, to the media, MRA, red pill, gamergate and a bunch of other things are all one and the same
/r/MensRights06/08/16 09:30 AM
3

Red pill is an entirely different group with an entirely different set of ideals and goals
/r/MensRights06/08/16 09:25 AM
1

havent seen it
/r/MensRights05/08/16 08:15 PM
8

May I invite you to /r/KotakuInAction/ to learn about the extreme feminazis that ruin gaming?
/r/MensRights05/08/16 07:43 PM
2

Should jail time be based on race?
/r/MensRights05/08/16 07:29 PM
3

Understatement of the year Though, I'm having fun playing a game of "out of context game quote or the red pill" Can anyone explain why my daughter is SUCH A FUCKING WHORE
/r/MensRights05/08/16 07:19 PM
3

see? plenty of stuff :D
/r/MensRights05/08/16 07:07 PM
5

Well, its probably best experienced yourself Theres a subreddit, /r/theredpill
/r/MensRights05/08/16 06:59 PM
4

I asked a female friend for "non fan service anime" My Neighbor Totoro Fruits Basket Cross Game Berserk (not for the faint of heart)
/r/MensRights05/08/16 06:58 PM
13

Some* anime Similar to feminism, one bad apple can spoil the bunch What are you into? Death Note is a classic and a good beginners anime, while Full Metal Alchemist is great story driven action series For comedy, "Shimoneta: A Boring World Where the Concept of Dirty Jokes Doesn't Exist" is a great satirical look at overcensoring (though, it does have some "fan service" in there, so may not be for you) Sorry for going all weeaboo on you :P but if you want a good anime recommendation, feel free to…
/r/MensRights05/08/16 06:52 PM
32

I'll try to be unbiased as possible The main problem is the "loudest mouth" principle, the loudest meanest voices get heard, but theres more then meets the eye here The problem is the influence those people have, a good example would be Anita Sarkisiaan who says things like anime being disgusting She's been invited to speak at the UN, and is one of time magazines 100 feminism has become associated with censorship and the idea that men shouldn't have an opinion, and a lot of people have jumped sh…
/r/MensRights05/08/16 06:32 PM
20

So here I am on /r/MensRights of all places trying to get any kind of feedback on my concerns. Judging from this, you may have some negative associations with MRA, could you share those either here, or in PM?
/r/MensRights05/08/16 05:47 PM
13

So funny story about that: posting here likely banned you off some other subreddits as many subreddits on the feminist network use bots to ban people that post on x and y sub....this one included
/r/MensRights05/08/16 05:46 PM
4

So, let me ask you this: what is our platform?
/r/MensRights05/08/16 05:42 PM
47

Mainly because of redpillers....we really need to find a way to distance ourselfs from them >_>
/r/MensRights05/08/16 05:02 PM
27

Oh come on dude, you're falling for buzzfeeds tricks, all they want is clicks to generate ad money http://archive.is/zuWLN
/r/MensRights05/08/16 02:33 PM
1

I don't think that's true. Even 'moderate' feminists believe women are disadvantaged, Actually, I can name an area where women are still disadvantaged: abortion Then again, with circumcision and "financial abortion", men also need a lot more rights
/r/MensRights11/07/16 08:02 PM
1

Where do you live then? xD
/r/MensRights14/06/16 05:49 AM
2

ooh, you shouldn't be single, you should be my boyfriend :P
/r/MensRights13/06/16 07:37 AM
1

As a gay guy A sensible gay guy with similiar political views as me? lemme guess you already have a partner? :P
/r/MensRights12/06/16 07:38 PM
2

Weirdly enough, only half of it Seriously, you should see my inbox, I'm on a gay dating site and holy shit you wouldn't believe how bad it is Difference between me and OP though, I don't bitch about it
/r/MensRights12/06/16 07:35 PM
1

Oh, right, forgot how archive.is works
/r/MensRights12/06/16 07:29 PM
-2

Eh, Nathan, this is how people get doxxed
/r/MensRights12/06/16 07:10 PM
13

I prefer the term "neutral respect", respect implies the person has done something to be respected
/r/MensRights15/05/16 05:29 PM
2

I'm pretty sure I'm banned from SRS without even ever visiting it, its meaningless
/r/MensRights08/05/16 01:45 PM
1

Look into the situation in spain....it will horrify you
/r/MensRights26/04/16 04:47 PM
0

just fuck off
/r/MensRights05/04/16 02:21 PM
1

Pretty sure she also defended Sarah Nyberg, a self confessed pedophile
/r/MensRights04/04/16 04:15 PM
-1

1 word: Australia
/r/MensRights04/04/16 04:12 PM
2

you oppressive shitlord, clapping is triggering - you should use jazzhands to show appreciation! (not even kidding, this is an actual thing SJWs have said)
/r/MensRights28/03/16 09:15 AM
1

jazzhands?
/r/MensRights27/03/16 08:41 PM
5

I'd rather talk normal thanks
/r/MensRights26/03/16 10:59 PM
13

Women are historically more oppressed due to their gender and overly sexualized for the male patriarchal gaze, due the historical societal structures of the patriarchy lesbians are considered sexual; while white cis men are considered the norm, ergo not oppressed - this obviously extends to the white cis homosexual man because marriage rights have become near universal, thus removing the barriers once imposed, this makes them part of the patriarchy and therefore vile oppressors how was that? i t…
/r/MensRights26/03/16 07:56 PM
1

Anyone mind r-outoftheloop -ing me?
/r/MensRights26/03/16 07:48 PM
2

Some seemed very reasonable, for example, discussions about women being raped in the middle east, how TX is practically killing off planned parenthood and this is already causing problems. congratulations, you found a few sane feminists in the ocean of insane feminists
/r/MensRights28/02/16 10:30 PM
5

Wasn't coppercrab a satire account?
/r/MensRights19/02/16 04:25 PM
1

Fair enough, still a lot of states retain these laws
/r/MensRights08/02/16 03:57 PM
1

Are you familiar with gamergate, and if you're anti: what standard of evidence would you accept to counter this?
/r/MensRights08/02/16 07:50 AM
1

I hate to break it to you, but many black men don't have the right to vote due to laws that make small crimes felonys, and once you're a felon you're not allowed to vote
/r/MensRights08/02/16 07:48 AM
2

I think its a similiar approach i would take to religion: let my kids sample all religions (and talk about agnostic and aithiest beliefs)
/r/MensRights05/02/16 08:48 PM
1

So, whos willing to bet he has worked on pages related to the guardian media group?
/r/MensRights05/02/16 08:46 PM
2

...Why did you post a delete link?
/r/MensRights24/01/16 02:29 PM
1

..using fallacious logic prove your points using sound logic and evidence
/r/MensRights18/01/16 07:05 PM
1

OP didn't mention country, so its difficult to google concrete and relevant information Picking the right fights is important in any movement, and focusing on military wage gaps with flimpsy info and explainable differences is not one that we should pivk
/r/MensRights17/01/16 06:09 PM
1

photos?
/r/MensRights17/01/16 05:31 PM
1

I'm wondering about this, it could be due to complexity or material differences /u/Stokersmintlongcut can you provide examples of the male and female uniforms for comparison? I doubt it's a straightup "heres more money"
/r/MensRights17/01/16 04:42 PM
1

the sad truth is, it's better then nothing, even though proper housing would be cheaper - this is all they can do reminds me of that story about a homeless person dine and dashing just to get thrown into jail
/r/MensRights16/01/16 11:27 PM
2

I think you're spot on, and congratulate you on voicing a very unpopular question Honestly, compared to a lot of other signs, it's fairly balanced, the remainder of the text is neutral (if you or someone you know is being hurt)
/r/MensRights08/01/16 01:24 PM
2

https://soundcloud.com/stevodeniero hes pretty good, give him a listen
/r/MensRights04/01/16 10:50 PM
1

To add onto this: if at all possible, have your mother stay at your house for at least a week, that way she will be a credible witness to the fact that you had your son for the last weeks
/r/MensRights02/01/16 03:25 PM
2

As far as I'm aware it's more a legal move then a practical one, i think it's designed to make domestic abuse easier to convict
/r/MensRights29/12/15 10:39 PM
6

It's a token response yes, but we should see this as a sign to keep pushing social media and overwhelming feedback to such things are powerful tools, time to start using them more
/r/MensRights29/12/15 10:38 PM
2

Aren't there rules about political affiliations and registered charity's?
/r/MensRights27/12/15 10:04 PM
2

takes hand well hello there
/r/MensRights21/12/15 10:10 AM
7

I think the last survey here did show a good chunk of gay males being present on this sub
/r/MensRights20/12/15 08:30 PM
1

It wasn't a warning, it was a comedic tl:dr in reference to craigslist being notorious for hookups with potential STDs, with a double play on the meaning of "donating sperm" with regular intercourse
/r/MensRights28/11/15 08:32 PM
-4

Thanks for that strawman, who let you out of the troll cave? No, its obviously not his fault, are you a idiot or something?
/r/MensRights28/11/15 06:48 PM
0

Well, some people consider thinking about a women rape....so it does make sense if you have that insane mindset
/r/MensRights28/11/15 02:22 PM
-2

Next step...child support payments. You know it's coming. Except no. There would be no legal basis for this, nor would any judge approve of such madness Conversation is about the fact that judges do not have any legal basis nor precedent to allow such a thing No we aren't. We are talking about how just because a law is one way today, it won't necessarily be the same way tomorrow: An this was clearly spelled out in the conversation tree. Maybe you think that in your mind, but you're wrong, judges…
/r/MensRights28/11/15 02:02 PM
-2

Right. let's review this case A judge ruled that William Marotta must pay child support, even though he says he signed documents waiving his parental rights. Okay, so why did this happen? Shawnee County District Court Judge Mary Mattivi said on Wednesday that Marotta failed to conform to Kansas law, which says a licensed physician must be involved in an artificial insemination process, court documents show. The documents show that the lesbian couple whom Marotta helped conceive a child say they …
/r/MensRights28/11/15 12:42 PM
-2

Read the goddamn thread, we're talking about child support payments
/r/MensRights28/11/15 12:34 PM
1

Right. and on what legal basis would this happen?
/r/MensRights28/11/15 10:54 AM
-2

And where has this happened exactly? compromising anonymity is bad;i strongly oppose it - but it doesn't mean they instantly need to pay child support
/r/MensRights28/11/15 10:53 AM
-1

[citation needed]
/r/MensRights28/11/15 10:50 AM
1

The writing is..odd to say the least Innocent Mr Williams was 'devastated' by the allegations, which led to him being questioned by police 'devestated', as if this wasn't a potentially career destroyer
/r/MensRights27/11/15 09:16 PM
-15

Except no. There would be no legal basis for this, nor would any judge approve of such madness
/r/MensRights27/11/15 09:13 PM
1

What, fox news defending men? what world am i in?
/r/MensRights21/11/15 09:57 AM
6

I'm not donating, but I'll be sure to disable adblocker to help in the future
/r/MensRights21/11/15 09:51 AM
0

I could've sworn they do have access to such records, can't they call it in to HQ or something? I could be totally be wrong as well though
/r/MensRights21/11/15 09:49 AM
3

Police has equipment to pull up records on-site, including birth records
/r/MensRights20/11/15 07:35 PM
0

It's the internet, poe's law and stuff
/r/MensRights16/11/15 10:00 PM
1

Lemme get this straight You think friendship does not exist?
/r/MensRights16/11/15 09:55 PM
0

I'm not being transphobic. Nah, you just want to deny a award because...reasons of genitalia?
/r/MensRights16/11/15 09:55 PM
0

It is not fucked up to call a male a man, even if he got a boob job and wants to be addressed differently. So, what does make a women a women? as far as I'm aware she transitioned fully
/r/MensRights16/11/15 07:38 PM
-7

Dude, fuck off with your blatant transphobia, I'm not quick to pull the "you're a bigot" card, but you are (and yes, you jerkward she does have a vagina) She identifies and transitioned into being a women, ergo she is a women, ergo she qualifies for any gendered awards (female athlete of the year, actress of the year, ect ect) Qualifying for a award doesn't mean you deserve one though
/r/MensRights16/11/15 07:35 PM
2

I dunno what i should think of myself when I can recognize Milo just from a thumbnail *although he does have fabulous hair
/r/MensRights16/11/15 07:29 PM
6

Friendship is gay magic FTFY
/r/MensRights16/11/15 04:59 PM
2

One thing though OP: Don't rely on appeal from authority fallacies, there are plenty of valid non-fallacious ways to debunk myths
/r/MensRights15/11/15 10:17 AM
1

Some subs yeah, but 2XC has some good moments
/r/MensRights15/11/15 10:15 AM
1

I wouldn't say it's bias in this case since it's not forbidden by reddit
/r/MensRights10/11/15 05:43 PM
1

It's not a banned practice, it's against the moddiquette - but nowhere says it's banned It's something that seems like it shouldn't be allowed, but is
/r/MensRights10/11/15 05:43 PM
1

Right, sure mate, conveniently ignore I said that it's a extreme response and that I'm stating this from a moderation way of thinking, not a feminist one
/r/MensRights10/11/15 05:41 PM
-7

I would hardly call 2 messages "spam", In a modmail getting messages in the 1000s? yes, it is spam Still it might have served better maybe to just remove the post and message me clarifying the existence of askfeminists rather then ban me, which seems to also domino into also being banned from askfeminists. like i said: Still, kind of an extreme response,
/r/MensRights09/11/15 08:56 PM
6

There's apparently a shared ban list going on in a lot of feminist/SJW subs, posting in katakuinaction will get you a ban in ~10 subs via an automatic bot
/r/MensRights09/11/15 07:48 PM
-9

From a moderation perspective: you did send 2 messages where 1 would suffice Questions should go in /r/AskFeminists rather then /r/feminism Still, kind of an extreme response, I'd have responded by just saying "1 message is sufficient"
/r/MensRights09/11/15 07:45 PM
3

yes /thread
/r/MensRights09/11/15 07:40 PM
-2

why phrase this as a 'war on women'? it's bloody stupid, im not in that camp at all Survey after survey shows that it's women who have 'conservative' views on abortion, men are generally 'liberal', and it's women who lead campaigns on that issue, and mostly women protesting - on both sides - about it. source? And women have a dozen birth-control options, from the pill, to the coil, morning-after pill etc. men have just got condoms. sex education is woefully awful in the US (also, men can get a v…
/r/MensRights09/11/15 01:53 PM
1

I wonder if bernie would hear our cause?
/r/MensRights09/11/15 10:31 AM
2

this is all true, but I have to agree with bernie that the right wing is attacking funding for PP and abortion rights in general While the latter is not too important to MRA, PP does wonderful work for both genders calling it a "war on women" is a tad over the top, but there are certainly issues caused by the right wing
/r/MensRights09/11/15 10:30 AM
1

What did you expect from an actress wanting to play in a low-budget crappy memoir about a feminist nobody really cares about?
/r/MensRights08/11/15 06:13 PM
1

You'll want /r/conspiracy
/r/MensRights08/11/15 05:13 PM
2

is this a confirmed feature?
/r/MensRights08/11/15 03:43 PM
15

Iiirc, it's some mechanism they have in place to prevent brigading She isn't important enough to reddit to outright modify her stats
/r/MensRights08/11/15 02:32 PM
2

OP is written massively confusing, so it's slightly less insane Though, why the 25 years, and not the logical 18?
/r/MensRights06/11/15 05:04 PM
3

Actually, the state wants him to pay 334k, but the state accountant/tax guy wants him to pay 18k (instead of the state paying 18k like you said) The insane part? the court case isn't about the guy paying - it's about if the state comptroller can limit funds resulting from the timothy cole act
/r/MensRights06/11/15 04:01 PM
3

So, let me get this straight Man falsely convicted of rape that spawned a child, is getting compensation for being falsely incarnated - which might get docked because he was falsely convicted of having fathered said child
/r/MensRights06/11/15 03:56 PM
9

Just FYI, linking a users name in this context may be grounds for reddit to ban you or this sub for brigading it's bloody stupid, but what do you expect >.>
/r/MensRights06/11/15 01:01 PM
1

My point is, don't sell to the general public, but have the business license double as a license for sale No extra costs are incurred that way, and acid stays out of the hands of psychos at least a little more effectively
/r/MensRights02/11/15 03:28 PM
1

But most, if not all uses are industrial uses?
/r/MensRights02/11/15 03:23 PM
2

How about "going beyond a block", e.g making a new account?
/r/MensRights02/11/15 01:42 PM
1

Either that, or a simple attention grabbing title, trp is more known then MRM
/r/MensRights02/11/15 01:24 PM
0

Not a mechanic, but it's only used in making battery's right? Restrict it to companies and fixed, correct?
/r/MensRights02/11/15 01:22 PM
1

What country? The silly thing is, bakeries are non- sexuality related, while gay bars are, it's kinda like victoria's secret - men are not exactly welcome, but also not banned
/r/MensRights02/11/15 01:18 PM
1

(just an apology btw, initially i thought you to be another zomg religion bigot) (since they had a priest officiating, you argued the wedding was religious). I keep hearing this, but no proof has been put forward, many atheists do have weddings in a church ceremony without it being religious for tradition/romance (a towns office is kinda unglamerous) and a just a reception seems...lacking If I ever got married, I would have a church wedding as well with a small group of close friends and family,…
/r/MensRights02/11/15 01:04 PM
1

Your religious rights don't extend to forcing someone else to help you practice your religion. AKA, bakers can't force gay people to obey their religious beliefs
/r/MensRights02/11/15 11:49 AM
1

Then what about the plenty of legal and financial benefits that come from getting married?
/r/MensRights02/11/15 08:08 AM
1

The same that your gay bar was started SPECIFICALLY for only gay people. It's in the bloody name Until somebody asked, it wasn't relevant. Just like gay bars don't hang up signs "For gays only", straight bakeries don't hang up signs "for straights only". Because people aren't complete idiots and assume people have the common decency to serve gay people at bakeries and straight people assume gay people would like straight people to stay away from gay bars because everywhere else is already straig…
/r/MensRights01/11/15 07:45 PM
0

Then proof that the guy started the bar SPECIFICALLY for only straight people You can't, because he started it with baking in mind, not peoples orientation, the religious stuff was a second thought I will concede you are right if you can proof he started the bakery with straight people in mind - prior to the controversy
/r/MensRights01/11/15 07:24 PM
1

I see no reason why a bakery wouldn't be founded with gay people in mind. Certainly examples exist of bakeries founded with straight people in mind. Such as Masterpiece Cakeshop in the Denver suburb of Lakewood. You seem to have trouble grasping the concept of "founding" a thing Gay bars are made for gays Bakeries are mae for baking, regardless of orientation
/r/MensRights01/11/15 07:14 PM
0

Let me translate: I'm a bigot that denies the civil rights of others based on a notion that marriage is not a government thing
/r/MensRights01/11/15 07:13 PM
0

Are all christians unable to process that marriage has become a simple government institution?
/r/MensRights01/11/15 06:03 PM
0

Sorry, poe's law applies here Either way, your argument still doesn't holds up - gay bars are founded with gay people in mind, bakeries are not
/r/MensRights01/11/15 06:02 PM
0

Strawman Oh look, you're self aware Masterpiece Cakeshop, in the Denver suburb of Lakewood. Funny /s
/r/MensRights01/11/15 05:46 PM
1

Historical marriage =/= modern day marriage
/r/MensRights01/11/15 05:45 PM
-1

So you want the priest restricted in his religious freedom? And regardless, like i said: Show me a bakery that was specially founded for straight people and maybe your argument has some merit, meanwhile gay bars were made specifically for gay people
/r/MensRights01/11/15 12:01 PM
2

Unless performed by a priest, it isn't religious
/r/MensRights01/11/15 11:32 AM
2

Well, I would think that your hypothetical straight bar wouldn't have a problem with gay people drinking there. The thing is, gay bars are some of the few places you can expect people to be gay, whereas elsewhere you would assume straightness As a gay male, when i am in shops or other public places I assume the people are straight, in a gay bar I would know they are open for flirtation ect
/r/MensRights01/11/15 10:33 AM
2

Right, because a piece of paper issued by the state is such a godly experience
/r/MensRights01/11/15 09:05 AM
1

If existing for baking means that the business must participate in a wedding they find religious objection too, Weddings are not religious, that's a disillusion christians have waned themselves into to not allow people equal rights Besides which, if you want to accept/promote a legal argument of "existing only for gay people to drink" then you must accept "baking only for straight people" Exist =/= founded for Show me a bakery that was specially founded for straight people and maybe your argumen…
/r/MensRights01/11/15 09:00 AM
2

Let me put it simply: Bakery's exist for baking Gay bars exist for gay people to drink Straight bars exist for straight people to drink
/r/MensRights01/11/15 08:45 AM
7

Notice the ""
/r/MensRights01/11/15 08:42 AM
0

Rape accusations? you can get easily be send to jail for a mere accusation
/r/MensRights28/10/15 07:19 PM
1

Meh, cliche, at least go out in a blaze of glory
/r/MensRights28/10/15 04:30 PM
1

Not much on an accomplishment, I mean I have like 10 bans just for posting in KiA
/r/MensRights28/10/15 03:54 PM
1

Uhm, are we on the same sub? "rape culture" rings any bells?
/r/MensRights28/10/15 03:51 PM
1

poe's law dude
/r/MensRights28/10/15 03:50 PM
1

AVFM, red pill....3 steps forward 2 steps back i suppose Good concept, but red pill isn't MRM
/r/MensRights28/10/15 11:16 AM
0

Also opposes gay marriage for the insanest of reasons (although, I'm inclined to call poe's law on this one) - gays are apparently more creative in the closet or something https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M0505RbdG5k
/r/MensRights28/10/15 11:12 AM
1

Men already have virtually no reproductive rights. And now it turns out that its their wives who should determine men's reproduction abilities. That's what the worst part is here, if the guy wanted to have a vasectomy - and the wife didn't, he can't have one
/r/MensRights17/10/15 10:55 AM
1

Deadbeat dads have nothing to do with alimony, btw. Punishment for being scum In my case, this was at the end of a long marriage
/r/MensRights06/10/15 05:47 AM
1

Then you should be equally afraid of christianity
/r/MensRights05/10/15 08:04 PM
0

The problem with that is the drain on the state, deadbeat dads are miserable
/r/MensRights05/10/15 08:02 PM
0

Alimony is a draconian social institution that disproportionately affects men, benefits women in financial need very little, and is primarily used by “gold-diggers” who are just out to abuse the legal system to live the easy life. Although I do agree alimony is in dire need of reform, it does help many people out such as myself, my parents split up when i was very young and my mother is partially disabled, with me/my brother to feed it was a life saver
/r/MensRights05/10/15 08:41 AM
2

That's extremist-islamaphobia
/r/MensRights05/10/15 08:38 AM
10

the whole "10% of M&Ms" things is a fallacy in itself anyways
/r/MensRights04/10/15 06:38 PM
1

Isn't it the other way around? I've seen many attempts to feminist-ize (is that a correct term? i doubt it) other movements, such as youtube atheism (called atheism+) feminists Muslims and many others
/r/MensRights04/10/15 06:36 PM
-1

O_o that's quite the tinfoil idea, although there are a bunch of marxist feminists
/r/MensRights04/10/15 06:34 PM
1

Nah, the reason it's weird is because a while back, a female MMA fighter actually spoke out against this idea
/r/MensRights04/10/15 06:32 PM
1

This is another assumption, we know that the SJW kind has been around since the very beginning of Feminism. The white feather, for example, where feminist women would shame boys as young as 16 for not throwing their lives away at the fronts of WW 1. white feathers
/r/MensRights27/09/15 08:24 AM
1

I'm not saying we give anyone controll, I'm saying we as a society need to figure out how much we put up with in terms of privacy vs law
/r/MensRights27/09/15 08:19 AM
3

I'd call it similar, but not preventing history from repeating itself
/r/MensRights26/09/15 05:28 PM
-7

The problem is, with no laws governing the internet to at least some extent, it would quickly become a mess Laws need to exist to prevent companies to breach net neutrality, and law enforcement needs a way to track down cyber criminals such as pedo's With this digital age we're in, we need to find the answer to how, when, where , and where the line is drawn between privacy/liberty and crime
/r/MensRights26/09/15 05:26 PM
8

UN is decentralized yes, but gain control of the UN then what? I'd rather have the countries themselves in control, that way content can be hosted elsewhere
/r/MensRights26/09/15 02:56 PM
48

Does the internet have the balls to take on feminism? We shall see... http://kukuruyo.com/comic/a-gamergate-speech-oliver-campbell/ Gamers are drawing the line, and pushing back
/r/MensRights26/09/15 02:53 PM
7

Oh? that's quite good then
/r/MensRights24/09/15 03:35 PM
4

Which sadly is an exception, and not common
/r/MensRights24/09/15 03:12 PM
1

I could see people considering the possibility. Ergo, my advocating for no suicide Pretty sure there if you're falsely accused it gets dropped and not put on your record. Same in america, but word of mouth sucks
/r/MensRights17/09/15 01:04 PM
1

Still not worth killing yourself over, when you are at your lowest, you can only go up
/r/MensRights17/09/15 12:19 PM
22

Have you read the article? "outside" as in "third party" These investigations are often run by former campus police officers or former sex-crimes prosecutors. They have dedicated their careers to uncovering wrongdoing, so it's only natural that they will tend to view every fact through a prism of guilt. Worse, these outsiders are not actually independent; they are looking for repeat business from deep-pocketed universities, and they know that it's cheaper and easier for schools to deal with a la…
/r/MensRights16/09/15 03:03 PM
17

I feel like I'm going to have to kill myself soon, because this entire society is run by loons without a lick of critical thinking, and it is becoming difficult to exist in their alternative universe. Please don't if you're serious, suicide is never worth it
/r/MensRights16/09/15 03:00 PM
1

Hit the nail right on the head
/r/MensRights08/09/15 07:13 PM
1

Point is, in the end it's not and it's probably due to some legal technicalities`
/r/MensRights27/08/15 11:46 AM
1

Should they? I'm not a legal expert, but I doubt it
/r/MensRights27/08/15 06:27 AM
1

I'm talking about the original draft of ERA
/r/MensRights27/08/15 06:27 AM
10

Once again [citation needed]
/r/MensRights26/08/15 09:53 PM
11

Also, no charges have been filed against the girl, even though she sent naked photos of herself. No charges == no evidence needed
/r/MensRights26/08/15 09:49 PM
2

And why would it be redundant if it forces the US to stop having double standards, like your title states? that clip doesn't address those points
/r/MensRights26/08/15 09:47 PM
14

[citation needed] I know of no case this actually happened, and considering the violent backlash it would cause it's doubtful it ever happened
/r/MensRights26/08/15 09:46 PM
7

So....isn't this a great action opportunity? help pass ERA
/r/MensRights26/08/15 09:41 PM
3

Gay man here as well, where is this stuff happening though? I've never seen it happen, but then again - I'm not in any gay communities (also,holland has pretty rested civil rights)
/r/MensRights22/08/15 10:15 PM
5

Did you even read the article? Great, great that’s really nice. Hard to find fault with that one. Except that, you know, I could raise awareness for important causes too. And I think it would carry a little bit more weight because I earned a platform to speak by accomplishing a feat of athleticism few human beings are capable of accomplishing. Tl:dr useless women without anything accomplished besides making a fool out of herself (seriously, who even trips over a little bit of blood anymore?) get…
/r/MensRights18/08/15 10:18 PM
1

Fun fact: in a lot of cases mothers don't actually need it The little money my mom got from my prick of a father (another fun fact: HE SUED TO GET THE CHILD SUPPORT BACK) she put into a separate bank account to give me on my 18th birthday
/r/MensRights10/08/15 09:52 PM
1

There are so many wacky legal things here, fighting it is the much better option The kid isn't his, easy fight there, might even get previous payments back The wife got the house, if she owns the house, she pays for the house (how the hell did this even happen?)
/r/MensRights10/08/15 11:49 AM
6

are trying to free ourselves from the archaic idea of a patriarchy, which affects both genders Wouldn't you agree a patriarchy would be unprofitable for anyone involved?
/r/MensRights06/08/15 10:30 PM
4

It's not going to be banned. /r/Coontown was vile, yes it was offensive to SRS/SJW types but it was also offensive to absolutely anyone else who wasn't a flaming racist. If you are a supporter of equality, which the typical poster on MensRights is, then you can hardly see any possible connection. To chime in on this, mensrights is not a sub they can ban without a massive fallout from it, similiar to subs like /r/KotakuInAction/ it would be seen as outright censorship rather then protecting, and …
/r/MensRights06/08/15 12:10 PM
7

The format bothers me because if it were an in person thing he's just being rude interrupting every single sentence and sometimes even mid-sentence. That's a pretty standard practice in the vlogging/response video community he feels he's obviously right when he's commenting No. he is certain he is right until proven otherwise (he actually recanted a video a bit back because he was wrong) - it's a strength I'd say
/r/MensRights05/08/15 06:05 PM
18

How so? to me, he just seems quite fed up with stuff, but not arrogant
/r/MensRights05/08/15 04:23 PM
-1

No idea actually, I'm not that invested in soccer
/r/MensRights03/08/15 05:10 PM
4

There may be a market for dwarf tossing, but if nobody is good at dwarf tossing then nobody is going to watch it
/r/MensRights03/08/15 02:05 PM
-12

50/50 split of importance
/r/MensRights03/08/15 01:34 PM
-11

If you suck at a sport then people wouldn't want to watch it either point is, its a huge factor - although possibly not the deciding factor -
/r/MensRights03/08/15 11:40 AM
-1

Here in holland minor leagues are quite well paid, even though the individual teams have less fans
/r/MensRights03/08/15 10:27 AM
-22

I have to disagree, time is a huge factor, because you spend time to get skill and skill is a huge deal in most sports
/r/MensRights03/08/15 10:26 AM
14

Does it matter? nope Is it interesting to look at? probably - I love statistics :P
/r/MensRights03/08/15 06:51 AM
55

I have to wonder though, how would success to pay ratio be calculated? Female models make more then male ones, but male soccer players make more then female ones Like Ronda Rousey said, at the top of your field for a given profession doesn't necessarily mean you put in the same amount of time
/r/MensRights03/08/15 06:39 AM
2

Her name is under several images, among with the last 2 letters of her name, plus her face and race are clearly visible
/r/MensRights31/07/15 10:53 PM
1

Oh that - this is the only thread I state that, and it was because the article i read was wrong and i only saw that after looking further, sourcing things in a discussion on the fly with 3 very hostile people is very hazy
/r/MensRights28/07/15 09:32 PM
1

did you read what i edited in? :/
/r/MensRights28/07/15 09:19 PM
1

First of all, it is my understanding that qualitudes were one of the popular drugs to abuse at that time, and that the initial accuser admits to requesting said drug. Yes, I was unaware of this, PunxTatto pointed this out, dramatically altering my opinion Similarly, alcohol is a depressant, which makes people drowsy Unrelated to cosby: I'd say alcohol and drugs designed for a certain to be two different things Further, it is my understanding that most of the accusations are coming out now, I cou…
/r/MensRights28/07/15 09:13 PM
1

"not fucking people over is the best policy" would be more fitting I'd say
/r/MensRights28/07/15 08:58 AM
0

Fair point (and not brought extremely hostile, which is a bonus), but while a famous person is more likely to have accusations to be brought before him, it's the timespan that's important here 50 years ago was a different kind of time, before all the campus rape hysteria, this coupled with his own admission of having illegal drugs that cause sleep makes me very suspicious of his character
/r/MensRights28/07/15 08:58 AM
-2

Let's end the night on something positive Since we're talking about crime and celebs, this seems fitting: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o0u4M6vppCI Good night....don't get murdered hehe (although, if I were to be murdered, I would want a opera playing about it)
/r/MensRights27/07/15 10:37 PM
-6

The way I see it, as a person I can make an opinion and judge, I don't have any real power, status or anything else that influences the court case It would be different if I was a public figure, judge or juror or anything of the like
/r/MensRights27/07/15 10:35 PM
-3

see other thread :)
/r/MensRights27/07/15 10:30 PM
-4

Two brancing conversations at the same time, apologies See, this is my point: I made my opinion, got presented with contrary evidence and now it's changed I'm back on the fence, while I still find it very suspicious that there are 35 cases of rape alleged, a high amount even for a celebrity - I do have to admit it might all have been consensual considering the popularity of the drug in question The most suspicious part for me was the roofies he had, but it might very well been used recreationall…
/r/MensRights27/07/15 10:30 PM
-4

That, I did not know - I never previously heard of the drug, and it seemed like a obscure kind of roofie, so it was fairly popular?
/r/MensRights27/07/15 10:24 PM
-2

Which has been pointed out to you already that the woman requested them and took them herself. Right, and he just magically happened to have illegal, sleep inducing drugs on him
/r/MensRights27/07/15 10:20 PM
-4

I mean, realisicly - what was he doing in procession of illegal drug known to cause sleepyness?
/r/MensRights27/07/15 10:18 PM
-5

What other evidence do you have that he did rape all those people? His own partial confession in court would qualify You would be a horrible juror because all you need is some people making a claim to make an opinion of guilt or innocence. Opinion =/= fact When it comes to making actual life-changing decisions, I would obviously be more careful Why not wait until things work through the system before making an opinion at all? And you haven't made the opinion he's innocent?
/r/MensRights27/07/15 10:13 PM
-6

What part of forming my own opinion didn't you get? 35 women (keep in mind, 50 years of time predates the campus rape hysteria) + revealed court documents make a strong case in my opinion If the trial commences and he is found not guilty, then I'll change my opinion, if I ever serve on a jury I look at the facts (then again, I don't live in a country with a terrible justice system)
/r/MensRights27/07/15 10:03 PM
-8

I can't have my own opinion?, I think he did it I form my own opinions and hold them until proven incorrect
/r/MensRights27/07/15 09:54 PM
-4

To be fair, you do seem to be very distrustful towards the 35 women Sorry if I offended you by calling you a redpiller - sometimes there is a very fine line between distrusting a large group of women and redpillers (sidenote, I'm only apologizing because callign someone a redpiller is a hurtful insult in my eyes)
/r/MensRights27/07/15 09:51 PM
-7

Again, then why are you here defending a very likely rapist if he is already getting due process?
/r/MensRights27/07/15 09:46 PM
-6

Right, 35 of them, again you sure you're not looking for /r/theredpill - you seem to think all women are evil and out for money I'm not too bothered by reddit karma, just made an observation that you're so petty you downvote all my comments
/r/MensRights27/07/15 09:42 PM
-2

I wish I had a horse, could have saved so much money on straw
/r/MensRights27/07/15 09:41 PM
-4

Your position is "listen and believe" [citation needed]
/r/MensRights27/07/15 09:36 PM
-5

Right. and it totally doesn't mean I think it casts serious doubt on his character, its 35 persons, if you don't consider that a problem you are the one that's messed up Also, don't you think if I thought "listen and believe" was proper evidence and due process was crap I would have negative karma, instead of 400 positive karma on this sub? Speaking of karma, you're pretty pathetic if you're downvoting me because I disagree with you, you should re-read reddiquette
/r/MensRights27/07/15 09:31 PM
-6

Sure mate, I want him to receive the death penalty and his head to be put on a spike Just because I don't agree with you doesn't mean I think everyone should "listen and believe"
/r/MensRights27/07/15 09:22 PM
-7

Nice strawman there buddy When did I say I don't want to have due process?
/r/MensRights27/07/15 09:17 PM
-1

So why would it be a semantic line?
/r/MensRights27/07/15 09:14 PM
-9

clearly "listen and believe" standard. Right, and you don't strawman at all. This ain't your typical college rape mate
/r/MensRights27/07/15 09:13 PM
-7

Sorry, this is /r/mensrights - not /r/theredpill
/r/MensRights27/07/15 09:10 PM
-4

Not exactly Argumentum ad populum means your argument states ""X is true because everyone says it is"", ManRAh is saying I'm invoking this fallacy because I hold an opinion shared by many other people, which is incorrect "cosby is a rapist because everyone says he is" would be a argumentum ad populum "cosby is likely a rapist because a overwhelming amount of accusers have come forward" is not an argumentum ad populum even though many think the same way check this link: https://yourlogicalfallacy…
/r/MensRights27/07/15 09:05 PM
-5

He probably did do it That's my entire freaking point, if there is a legal case ongoing, he's getting due process, so why are you defending a person who is 90% sure to be a rapist?
/r/MensRights27/07/15 08:58 PM
-6

Let's just wait until the facts are in. So, why the hell are you defending him? you don't see the problem in defending someone who is accused by a whopping 35 people over a 50 year period? even without evidence it's very likely to be true Compare it to a mass murderer, if there are 35 witnesses saying he is a mass murderer, you can already be pretty damn sure it's true
/r/MensRights27/07/15 08:50 PM
2

Ofcourse Honestly, it's bloody stupid to call yourself a MRA regardless, just like calling yourself a feminist is stupid - you are a person with opinions,that you form on your own, identifying yourself with a single group is idiotic
/r/MensRights27/07/15 08:46 PM
-8

but hedeserves due process. Who is denying him that? nobody But seriously, how can you defend him even when he admits to at least 2 cases of rape in 2005? he may be guilty of it in modern terms Except this isn't the case, are you sure you're in the right sub? /r/theredpill seems more your jam - not everything is a feminist conspiracy
/r/MensRights27/07/15 08:44 PM
-13

Right. and the incidents are so similar in structure /s rape === witchery Confession under oath === confession under torture 35 incidents in 50 years (with some that already were confessed to) === large scale superstitions (disproven by science) over a period of centuries
/r/MensRights27/07/15 08:20 PM
-8

It applies because popular opinion No it doesn't, argumentum ad populum means I would be arguing from a point of "everyone says it so it's true"
/r/MensRights27/07/15 08:05 PM
-21

You must be a special kind of stupid when you compare a modern day incident to something that happened in 1692
/r/MensRights27/07/15 07:59 PM
-10

Argumentum ad populum. You're not using that term correctly https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/bandwagon An argumentum ad populum would be "everyone says bill cosby is a rapist, so it must be true" - while I'm saying "there are 35 women, spread over years and years of time that say hes a rapist, so there is a 90% certainty it's true"
/r/MensRights27/07/15 07:48 PM
-13

1 is an accusation 2 forms a uncertainty of character 3 forms a pattern 35 is a complete clusterfuck and not trusting that is red pill levels of distrust
/r/MensRights27/07/15 07:45 PM
-7

all 35+ of them?
/r/MensRights27/07/15 07:41 PM
4

Let me put this into perspective: Gawker is so bad, it's the only thing KiA and gamerghazi agree on
/r/MensRights27/07/15 07:13 PM
2

I'd say there are better lessons to learn from this
/r/MensRights27/07/15 07:12 PM
-5

It's one thing to have a single accuser, it's another to have 35+ edit: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/3ese1u/obama_on_cosby_if_you_give_a_woman_or_a_man_for/ctiawp3 I'm back on the fence, while I still find it very suspicious that there are 35 cases of rape alleged, a high amount even for a celebrity - I do have to admit it might all have been consensual considering the popularity of the drug in question The most suspicious part for me was the roofies he had, but it might very wel…
/r/MensRights27/07/15 07:07 PM
1

Fair enough, I'm just being realistic here People have preserveerd through worse
/r/MensRights16/07/15 07:58 PM
2

Yes, but there is a major difference between 1 person mailing 20 sites or 20 people mailing 1 site One is a waste of time, the other is worth a look
/r/MensRights16/07/15 09:20 AM
1

I dunno man, it should be given a lot of though, because GG is a similar, yet completely different beast to MRA
/r/MensRights16/07/15 08:17 AM
2

That would be a big shotgun aproach....you would do some good but my question is:is it worth it?
/r/MensRights16/07/15 08:16 AM
3

Do you actually have any idea at all what gamergate is? -no idea where you got the occupy wallstreet comparison from -GG got demonized by the corrupt media because we fight against them and SJWs -we are trying to be inclusive? big [citation needed] on that one -where didnt we resist SJWs? -Where are we divided exactly?
/r/MensRights15/07/15 11:20 PM
2

what kind of sicko are you? The hentai kind ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
/r/MensRights15/07/15 08:49 PM
1

Funny /s
/r/MensRights15/07/15 08:47 PM
5

To start, those who advertise with misandrist publications such as Jezebel, Gawker media sites, maybe even Cracked. First two:pretty sure it wont have much effect because they mainly target a more "newb" audiance that wouldnt care...although cracked might work due its younger audiance Additionally, we could email news websites which post anti-male stories and complain. Right, have fun with being laughed away by people because you're seen as a whiney jackass (even though it's a legit point to com…
/r/MensRights15/07/15 08:47 PM
2

Frankly, it would be better for the MRA movement to go offline rather then online, KiA has a massive audience and a high amount of people sending emails Writing physical letters and picketing has become a rarity, and you can do a lot more direct damage as such, as it's more valued
/r/MensRights15/07/15 04:05 PM
2

Let me politely disagree. Agreed, it would be refreshing to see such a thing on reddit First, as far as that particular campaign goes it's not secondary. That would be true if the main goal isn't to bring down polygon;a bastion of corruption in the gaming media Second, GamerGate activism definitely has "don't shit on your audience" theme. And the only audience that media thinks it's ok to shit on is men. After all, the reason "Gamers are dead" attack happened was because the journos thought that…
/r/MensRights15/07/15 04:03 PM
3

I doubt it's a good tactic for MRAs, GG is targeting advertisers that have ads with bad outlets with proof of wrongdoing...who would MRA mail and with what?
/r/MensRights15/07/15 02:59 PM
1

Like I said, secondary
/r/MensRights15/07/15 02:57 PM
2

No sign there, so its probably removed already
/r/MensRights15/07/15 02:56 PM
1

People always seem to forget this
/r/MensRights15/07/15 11:59 AM
2

OP, where did you take this picture, I just looked on maps and there doesn't appear to be such a sign near the haje restaurant
/r/MensRights15/07/15 11:47 AM
7

Not exactly We're campaigning against corruption in the games media, polygon is just one of the many corrupt sites out there,misandry is a secondary thing
/r/MensRights15/07/15 11:42 AM
1

No harm no foul,I'm just trying to be snarky :P
/r/MensRights09/07/15 05:23 PM
1

A tad late for that ain't it?
/r/MensRights09/07/15 05:20 PM
3

As for being chilish... He started the insults (and has some seriously bad misconceptions regarding autism) I'll take my humor away now....
/r/MensRights09/07/15 04:49 PM
2

Then why are you scared to tell me what you think autism is? you avoid the entire question several times
/r/MensRights09/07/15 03:45 PM
2

Well have fun with the rest of your life, not knowing a single thing about autism and pretending you know
/r/MensRights09/07/15 03:42 PM
2

How the weather there on your high horse?
/r/MensRights09/07/15 03:35 PM
2

Are you just trolling at this point or what? I'm not impaired in a intellectual capacity, nor a social one, my autism manifests in other ways, such as lacking time management Seriously though, at this point I'm seriously wondering what you think autism is, do you think it's like down syndrome or what?
/r/MensRights09/07/15 03:13 PM
3

No shit sherlock, what twisted thing do you think autism is? :/
/r/MensRights09/07/15 03:05 PM
3

Pray tell, what do you think autism actually is?
/r/MensRights09/07/15 03:03 PM
3

Funny you should ask, I'm in a institute - ofcourse you think these institutes are closed off, but in reality: they aren't
/r/MensRights09/07/15 02:57 PM
5

Are you sure you're in the right sub? /r/theredpill would be more suited for you it seems
/r/MensRights09/07/15 02:50 PM
6

believe no solution can ever involve confrontation. Did I say that? no I didn't avoid =/= none at all
/r/MensRights09/07/15 01:42 PM
4

Are you completely stupid or just an asshole? Avoiding confrontation is not illogical or not being able to perform basic functions, and people with autism (depending on the kind of autism) are often humans who fit into society on a reasonable level with one of two main problems
/r/MensRights09/07/15 01:19 PM
2

You clearly don't now what autism and other disabilities are, seriously go educate yourself
/r/MensRights09/07/15 12:33 PM
13

you really are a fucking idiot. your error is trying to appease crazy, this is what you need to do. And you are a worse one, as someone with classic autism I can comfirm we don't deal much head-on (I have bipolar, ADD, and Aspergers, I don't deal well with confrontation), As OP said, he tried to avoid confrontation But having said that, biding your time and collecting evidence is a good step
/r/MensRights09/07/15 11:15 AM
3

For now, they really got swarmed by the extra traffic from reddit fuckups - so all they can do is apply bandaids
/r/MensRights04/07/15 07:20 PM
9

This was worth watching just for Milo in an housewife outfit
/r/MensRights02/07/15 03:58 PM
3

cough /r/KotakuInAction/ cough
/r/MensRights02/07/15 03:52 PM
0

How you don't see this as a ad hominem is a mystery to me
/r/MensRights30/06/15 04:38 PM
1

If you actually had read my posts, you would actually know I'm not advocating for a "guilty until proven innocent" aproach
/r/MensRights30/06/15 03:02 PM
0

Oh hey, another complete idiot who doesn't read anything I have said and just assumes I'm talking about the article, while I'm responding to someone else on a philosophical matter
/r/MensRights30/06/15 02:36 PM
0

Are you a complete idiot or what? I literally started this conversation with this: I mean obviously "guilty until proven innocent" laws are bloody stupid
/r/MensRights30/06/15 01:03 PM
-2

How about if you do 30 years to further a political agenda, and not one guilty person is convicted because of it. I never said anything about the certainty of guilt, I could have meant the other 10 have a 90% certainty of guilt, but ofcourse you would rather get on your high horse and insult me
/r/MensRights29/06/15 09:27 PM
-8

It mostly depends, but yes I live in Holland, where prison conditions are not as horrible as america, and with 30 years as a sentence, I would take it if I knew it would lock up 10 murderers who likely would murder again (also, I seem to recall dutch prisons do have a high rehabilitation rate)
/r/MensRights29/06/15 05:36 PM
-11

...But that doesn't mean we should shift the burden of proof onto the accused and risk putting innocent people in jail. Better to let 10 rapists go free than imprison 1 innocent person etc etc. If indeed that is what's happening here - I have to read the article and figure it out. I really wonder about this;is it really better/more moral to let 10 criminals go in favor of 1 innocent man? - I mean obviously "guilty until proven innocent" laws are bloody stupid, but from a philosophical point.....…
/r/MensRights29/06/15 05:26 PM
2

This discussion was removed from even KiA Citation needed
/r/MensRights24/06/15 07:49 PM
1

The problem is that TwoX is often just lumped together with a lot worse
/r/MensRights10/06/15 08:50 AM
5

I'm not quite sure, but I do recall there being more then one case of a women living as a man for the same purpose
/r/MensRights09/06/15 03:16 PM
68

Also, it ended up giving her all kinds of screwed up mental issues from fucking with her gender identity, so kudos to her for seeing it through. I was about to mention this, didn't a few people try this kind of experiment and all went crazy?
/r/MensRights09/06/15 12:11 PM
3

Often times subs such as TwoX and mensrights aren't that different at all, theres a lot of common ground to be found - but it's overshadowed by the shouting matches of subs such as ghazi and red pillers A friend of mine is a feminist, and I'm (kinda, sorta) a MRA - we have a lot of intelectual discussions, sometimes we just have to agree to disagree though
/r/MensRights09/06/15 12:08 PM
6

The feminists posted it on their facebook that they would be back, so I'd think they can send a person And I mean more then just this event, most MRA events are targeted like this (and fire alarms need better protection as well)
/r/MensRights06/06/15 08:46 AM
1

The event wasn't at a campus? from what I know CAFE is a organization?
/r/MensRights06/06/15 08:33 AM
2

What I don't get is why they dont call in ahead of time to the police to have at least one cop present
/r/MensRights06/06/15 08:23 AM
1

The point is not using it;the point is when it's used when it's irritant or used for "extra points" (like this person, being a "gay feminist") Lots of times, it's useful to note such as in discussions (for example, like the post on the frontpage about MRAs being excluded from the pride parade)
/r/MensRights31/05/15 08:46 AM
2

[rant] Why do people feel the goddamn need to always mix the gay part in with literally everything? A gay feminist, A gay barista, A gay president I'm a gay austistic MRA, and that's the only time you will ever hear me say that, 75% of the uses of the word "gay" are in the wrong context, and it's a huge pet peeve for me //rant
/r/MensRights30/05/15 07:30 PM
2

I kinda think it does come in the SJW lingo territory, because it's frequently used there
/r/MensRights27/05/15 05:25 PM
1

I just said you were right?
/r/MensRights27/05/15 05:11 PM
3

huh, you're right - too much stupid SJW lingo
/r/MensRights27/05/15 04:28 PM
1

whoops, you're correct
/r/MensRights27/05/15 04:27 PM
-1

you know cis means straight? so banning cis men means banning straight men
/r/MensRights27/05/15 04:15 PM
1

no cis men allowed how dare you assume I'm a cis male! le pwned
/r/MensRights27/05/15 02:40 PM
2

(by the way, as this poster stands it excludes gay men). Are you talking about OP or your own poster idea
/r/MensRights27/05/15 02:39 PM
36

but they refused to listen to me and forced their way in. HIGHLY illegal
/r/MensRights06/05/15 06:16 PM
1

Polygon "This happened. This is news worthy. What is going on?" Gamergate in a nutshell as the guy below said, you expect the media which we are campaigning against to report (fairly) on us? (for more info visit gamergate.me )
/r/MensRights05/05/15 09:54 AM
2

Yeah no. you just brought into the stereotype and the feminist narrative - theres more to GG then 4channers,8channers and diehard gamers I'm part of the "GG crowd" and never even been to 4chan (and don't even know what that something awful forum is) A large part of GG does occur on 8chan due to it's hands-off approach to moderating from a site level
/r/MensRights05/05/15 09:52 AM
3

Pissed in an alley while stumbling home drunk? Sex offender. This one is just batshit insane and even in the scope of the insane definitions it shouldn't be there
/r/MensRights05/05/15 09:47 AM
1

I can't think of a good one to justify it. I know a lot of people feel this way too. You commit a crime, you should be punished. However, after your punishment, you shouldn't be continually punished for the crime. To play devils advocate for a moment, the theory behind it is pretty good, since most sex offenses are committed by the victim knows so the registry can be an important tool to keep tabs on it Having said that, in practice it ruins lives even for small (/accidental) offenses like in OP…
/r/MensRights05/05/15 09:45 AM
3

First thing I thought about: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rTSR7Go5Ue4 Impressive narration from Sargon
/r/MensRights01/05/15 02:55 PM
7

my fraternity army Big difference here mate, one is volunteer - the other forced
/r/MensRights21/04/15 06:50 PM
1

Actually, the weird outfits are the funny part here it seems, not the message I mean come on, white suits with a red crouch? that shit looks weird
/r/MensRights21/04/15 01:06 PM
3

Canadian feminist It's more complex then feminism with the gaming press and the such, but feminism is a large part in essence
/r/MensRights20/04/15 05:48 PM
11

There are circlejerks on both sides of the coin Besides the god awefull redpillers, we don't got much of that around - although when put into proportional size it's about the same amount What I disagree with is the fact that we operate on opposite ends of the spectrum. I have to disagree here, MRM tends to focus on equality of opportunity, while many feminists are focused on equality of result While the end goal is the same, the methods to get couldn't be more apart
/r/MensRights16/04/15 05:47 PM
2

backbone of the movement Backbone, you're right Fringe, those stereotypes are spot-on (no offense to lesbians or fedora wearers)
/r/MensRights16/04/15 05:44 PM
5

*nods respectfully*\
/r/MensRights16/04/15 05:42 PM
0

Honestly, it has been slowly rolling downhill though, I've been lurking/posting for a decent while and I clearly notice a slight decline in standards (it's minimal, but still over a longer period you do notice it)
/r/MensRights14/04/15 10:49 PM
2

You might want to rather some support first and foremost, if you don't got at least a small group backing you it could backfire and paint a massive target on your back
/r/MensRights14/04/15 10:43 AM
1

Both are big double standards and make light of a serious issiue, I don't see much of an difference And even moreso, what are you going to do about it? walk up to someone and point it out? write an article about it? like that ever went well on any level We need to focus on important things, not some jackass comedian
/r/MensRights12/04/15 08:49 PM
1

It's the same with the "sorry it's a boy" ad that ran, the women saying it was a comedian. so lets ignore this double standard and focus on the bigger issues, double standards aren't something you can face headon anyways Comedy is often conflated with offense, but it shouldnt be
/r/MensRights12/04/15 08:38 PM
2

Why don't you vote for the lesser evil? I mean even in inaction you vote in a sense, more moderates mean less extremists which means more chance they won't completely ruin everything By not voting you are in fact voting for the bigger evil, by not voting for the lesser evil Or, be bastardized by everyone you like and start a MRA party, being unpopular sucks but sometimes it's needed
/r/MensRights12/04/15 08:33 PM
6

apply for location data on your phone This! tech trails are your best friend in this situation, she called you after reporting the incident, any normal person wouldn't do that
/r/MensRights05/04/15 09:58 AM
11

This Psycho-pass 2 puts it nicely: "The law doesn't protect people. People protect the law. " Cops have a difficult job;they are demonized yet needed for a peaceful society There are bad cops, who will screw you over for no reason, and there are good cops - who might bend the rules a bit to help people out Cops are people,there are good ones and bad ones, just like normal life
/r/MensRights05/04/15 09:56 AM
4

broke new glasses important evidence called tech trail
/r/MensRights05/04/15 09:51 AM
1

Pretty much, but that's also in the sidebar over at KiA - so I didn't bother to mention it
/r/MensRights30/03/15 02:35 PM
50

I'd say the state of affairs in the world is so sad that we find this reasonable to believe because it isn't far from the norm
/r/MensRights25/03/15 10:04 AM
1

Hmm, I think this is up for debate though She is providing a product many people want, at the expense of many others, so one could argue she is legit (weirdly enough, her videos are reinforcing negative gamer stereotypes though)
/r/MensRights25/03/15 09:59 AM
1

inciting anger is terrorism? I thought only SJWs said that
/r/MensRights25/03/15 09:57 AM
2

Wasn't it ZQ who initially cried mysogany? Frankly, I have no idea - it was such a clusterfuck I doubt anyone knows Without the latter, this would have been a relatively minor incident. Minor? no. less vocal/clusterfucky? yup It was a long time coming, and it would have exploded regardless of who did what, people were sick of all the unethical behavior already
/r/MensRights24/03/15 03:59 PM
0

Yeah, and who makes the argument that it's misogyny? the feminists AKA they have shoehorned themselves into the argument by making it about something else
/r/MensRights24/03/15 03:23 PM
0

My point is, the focus here is, and should be on Nathan Grayson giving favorable coverage to a friend - the whole feminist thing is outside this sphere and most people want it outside GG
/r/MensRights24/03/15 03:08 PM
9

Eh, I wouldn't call her a terrorist I would rather call her a charlie sheen wannebe
/r/MensRights24/03/15 02:14 PM
0

My point is: the whole feminism vs gaming misogyny is something besides the conflict If we compare it to a war, it's basically gamers versus the gaming media, with feminists manning the artillery, to most GGers we would love to split the whole thing off to speed up to our goals, but we can't do that (quite frankly, I don't even care about ZQ, I care about the guys that failed to disclose that they had personal ties to the developer they were reviewing)
/r/MensRights24/03/15 02:11 PM
0

So tell me, if your asertion is true, then where do the ethics in media come in? such gems as game journalists refusing to tell us when they are reviewing games from their friends?
/r/MensRights24/03/15 02:06 PM
-1

What do you suppose triggered GG then?
/r/MensRights24/03/15 11:28 AM
1

I would disagree with that, the main triggering force is the ZQ incident, which basically set everything ablaze that has been brewering for ages Feminism latched onto it because it was convenient that ZQ was a female developer, ergo feminism is not the main driving force here - without it we probably would have been done ages ago with ethical standards in place everywhere Feminism is the by-effect, not the main offender in this case, the main offenders are the people who betrayed their demograph…
/r/MensRights24/03/15 11:15 AM
6

Quite frankly, GG is not as much "inspired by feminism" but rather it's something we somehow have to deal with for no apparent reason while trying to get sites like kotaku to get some sense of ethics
/r/MensRights24/03/15 09:57 AM
2

men's rights groups attempt to take money from going to women's shelters Actually, we would like that to create normal domestic violence shelters,open to all genders Question: are there feminists (or exfeminists) that share a similar experience to mine? Personally, I am a weird breed around here - I consider myself, and at the same don't consider myself both a MRA and a feminist, and I think you could be the same It pissed me off and so I decided I was going to dig deep. Like you, I don't take t…
/r/MensRights17/03/15 12:36 PM
12

Or, like my fiance (m/m couple) who had to flee his home country for being gay, when he tells me what he experienced there I just want to hug him and tell him everything will be okay :(
/r/MensRights17/03/15 12:25 PM
2

What is the best thing we can do for more equality? (not a specific kind of equality, just equality across the board) Also, ask if she would come in /r/mensrights and do a AMA edit: actually maybe do it both here and on /r/feminism or feminism related sub - I'd be interesting to see what questions are asked
/r/MensRights03/03/15 03:03 PM
1

"Misogynist harasser" and "average internet troll" fits to a great extent the same stereotype, right? To some extent yes, the main different is the intent Trolls live to annoy people;regardless of any gender/race/sexuality but will target such things to get under their skin "Misogynist harasser" is supposed to be someone who is sexist/is harassing women,and usually refers more to RL people "happy mothers day you ugly bitch" sounds more like an internet troll, while "bitch" is usually seen as a "…
/r/MensRights26/02/15 08:22 AM
1

Mind explaining why you think this video explicitly and purposefully depicts the young boy as a "misogynist harasser" rather then your average internet troll? http://respectzone.org/en/ The campaign has nothing to do with gender;in fact most material discussed seems to be gender neutral
/r/MensRights25/02/15 09:11 PM
1

Cultural attitudes harden into law and public policy. This is an not inconsequential issue. I'm not saying that, I'm saying this video is nowhere near a good example of such cultural attitudes
/r/MensRights25/02/15 07:05 PM
2

GGer? I'm kinda part of GG as well,but mostly got outside of it recently due to RL crap taking more priority Anyways, where is your actual proof this ad is targeted at young boys specifically? It could have featured any combination of race/gender and still have portrayed the same message it intended to be Instead of focusing on this unimportant video from france, that only reached an unimpressive viewcount of 20k (in over 2 weeks) and from what I can find didn't even air on TV (there is a englis…
/r/MensRights25/02/15 07:04 PM
0

Wonder why that might be pure coincidence - I'm all for activism, but this is leading into nitpicking territory, it's an ad against "online hatred" (Jack thompson anyone?), not an ad against young boys
/r/MensRights25/02/15 04:48 PM
-4

that's a bit of a stretch I don't see how this is against boys;just consider the following: Can the character be replaced with the other gender, and would the message change? It wouldn't, no focus is on the boy saying it, but rather the focus is on the text written
/r/MensRights25/02/15 03:28 PM
4

I'm talking about numbers - strength is in numbers,and more people working towards the same goal (gender equality) is better Just need to agree on the methods used.....which is unlikely between feminists and MRM
/r/MensRights19/02/15 12:24 PM
3

We can't work together Which is a shame,considering it would benefit everyone to work together and open a proper dialogue
/r/MensRights19/02/15 11:28 AM
0

Fair enough, but generalization isn't a good practice to be doing in an already messy debate
/r/MensRights07/02/15 07:11 AM
18

Fucking bookburning ignorant fascist jihadists. Dude, not cool - be respectful, as a fellow GGer, we need to stay respectful and polite rather then give in to the anti sides hatred
/r/MensRights06/02/15 08:40 PM
1

I meant actually sending someone to the couch
/r/MensRights04/02/15 04:39 PM
3

I was never a feminist....I never been a MRA either - and I'm neither to this day I believe in rationality,that's why I'm on this sub,don't expect special treatment if you're being a jackass though,I will destroy you ;)
/r/MensRights04/02/15 08:56 AM
2

So whats so bad in their response? Lame jokes and condemnation on the top
/r/MensRights04/02/15 08:53 AM
-2

Are you serious are trolling? they might be thinking it,but I doubt any feminist ever has said it
/r/MensRights04/02/15 08:49 AM
1

Because violence against men doesn't exist. Actually,I rather think it's a political thing here - it's more likely to pass into law if it's "just"
/r/MensRights04/02/15 08:47 AM
1

"sleeping on the couch" is just a tv-trope,who the hell actually does that?
/r/MensRights04/02/15 08:43 AM
15

And women don't have to listen to men Simple equality,is that so hard?
/r/MensRights03/02/15 08:00 AM
38

It starts off with a real zinger
/r/MensRights01/02/15 01:47 PM
1

Well this will be fun: kid:soooo,you gave sperm...to make me guy:pretty much
/r/MensRights28/01/15 08:56 PM
1

Honestly,to some extent men should have a say in the matter as well,though more consideration should be given to the women,because besides the moral and mental implications,consideration should be given to the physical matters as well (I mean,child birth being painful and all)
/r/MensRights28/01/15 08:52 PM
1

I get what you're saying,but I feel like the reasoning of this case supersedes the rest,in the least it's (im blanking on the word,killing purely to preserve genes)
/r/MensRights28/01/15 07:31 AM
1

No,if you want to do so,that's your opinion,but I think motivation supersedes time
/r/MensRights27/01/15 07:33 AM
1

Typo
/r/MensRights26/01/15 08:06 PM
1

I have to disagree there mate,the opposing force is anti-gamergate Though 3rd wave feminists are part of anti-GG,not all of anti are feminists,although it's worthy to note that the majority of the "figureheads" are
/r/MensRights26/01/15 05:43 PM
2

Stereotypical? what do you mean?
/r/MensRights26/01/15 05:02 PM
3

If you believe she is a murderer, then you have to believe that all people who have abortions are murders. I am not trying to start a political debate about abortion, just pointing out a logical fallacy. Actually,not really She made a choice,when she heard the identifying characters of the baby,I would call that murder because she killed the baby on purpose for it's identifying characters Honestly,I'm personally not 100% sure where I draw the line,but by any standard I would call this murder,bec…
/r/MensRights26/01/15 04:46 PM
1

Hiya,gamergater here stupidly enough,we're actually trying to stop worrying about feminism and stuff,but it seems we cannot do so >.> every time we try to get to proper discussions regarding ethics,somehow feminism gets involved again
/r/MensRights26/01/15 08:53 AM
1

I'm not familiar with the american court system,but I could imagine if they disallow showing it at all
/r/MensRights20/01/15 07:10 AM
1

So,you're going to wait for an accusation before you discover it's invalid evidence?
/r/MensRights19/01/15 07:38 AM
1

break in law? I'm talking about videotaping law
/r/MensRights19/01/15 07:03 AM
1

True enough Though,a sign might not cut it depending on where you live,again - checking the law is vital! If you're not a criminal,the law is on your side
/r/MensRights19/01/15 06:52 AM
1

So you won't ever leave your house or car? well that's a fun life!
/r/MensRights18/01/15 09:15 AM
2

You know the funny thing? from the title,it's all incorrect If Hermione Were The Main Character In “Harry Potter” AKA "what if the story was seen from Hermione her viewpoint" AKA story doesn't change and the movie is seen through her eyes
/r/MensRights17/01/15 08:51 AM
1

I think "reverse genders" is a more proper tag,rather then "outrage" Somewhere along the line, hysteria trumped logic and decided that some people have to be protected from common sense and others do not. But we have to remember that students falsely accused of sexual assault are also victims. If blaming a woman for her sexual assault is wrong, blaming a man for being falsely accused should also be wrong. "outrage" is more for posts which highlight unjust things,while this is just turning to rev…
/r/MensRights16/01/15 03:05 PM
3

I would recommend it as well,but also recommend checking the law beforehand regarding its use/legality as evidence in court - and if not allowed start petitioning for law change
/r/MensRights13/01/15 07:41 AM
8

UPDATE: Albuquerque Police Department spokesman Tanner Tixier told TheBlaze on Monday evening that police were not pursuing additional charges against Griego because, despite the apparent falsehood of her sexual assault claim, police did not want to set a precedent that could discourage other potential victims of sexual assault from coming forward. Bitches like her ruin everything >.>
/r/MensRights13/01/15 07:40 AM
0

Except I already laid out an argument that disproves the theory - the rate of autism found in circumcised infants matches the average rate Besides,it doesn't answer my question at all,what is the proof that pain causes autism besides statistic that matches the average?
/r/MensRights12/01/15 01:06 PM
0

Have you been reading this thread? I just provided a counter argument this source,and you quote it as proof for it being true?
/r/MensRights12/01/15 12:09 PM
1

[citation needed] I mean jesus christ,seriously man? "pain causes autism" - if major pain was a factor in autism,don't you think substantially more people would have autism? And even if you say it's just pain with babies,wouldn't you think if it's a factor there would be a higher percentage in babies with birth defects (early birth,conjoined twins and the such),but this never has been observed So screw you for hindering research into the brain,my father has it,my brother has it,and I have it,it'…
/r/MensRights12/01/15 08:10 AM
1

Why are the sources for anti-gamergate allowed then? most stuff happens on twitter Plus,I've seen twitter cited before,i thought that was allowed?
/r/MensRights12/01/15 08:04 AM
1

I'm quite the hip-hop artist myself,do you do it old-school or modern?
/r/MensRights11/01/15 08:54 PM
3

Interesting? the term you're looking for is "research on the same level of vaccines causing autism" Circumcision is bad for a lot of reasons,but fuck you if you think it causes autism,people who think this are hindering research into the proper source:the brain Oh,and its complete BS as well http://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/autism/data.html During the study over 340,000 boys were followed up to the age of nine between 1994 and 2013 and almost 5,000 cases of ASD were diagnosed. Compare the numbers 1 in …
/r/MensRights11/01/15 08:49 PM
1

Were you involved in the GG article? what do you think about the sanctions given out?
/r/MensRights11/01/15 08:25 PM
1

Actually,there are some points in there that are actually issues (though,CH horribly misrepresents them)
/r/MensRights11/01/15 08:23 PM
4

It's funny how this raises controversy Nobody actually understands the hidden meaning - in the end the male/adult is left behind in a cage,while the women/kid can escape Anyone ever hear the phrase "women and children first"?,its a common phrase when a ship goes down (when things go wrong)
/r/MensRights11/01/15 08:20 PM
1

Who the fuck does even do this except the douchyess of douches? I've never even seen anyone do this,let alone heard it being a problem
/r/MensRights10/01/15 12:38 PM
1

Yeah sorry,I only realized both of them were spammers after posting Though,I'm pretty proud someone made a troll account for me
/r/MensRights09/01/15 06:14 AM
1

And you pretty much lost all credibility by using godwins law edit:oh goodie,double sockpuppets,how fun
/r/MensRights08/01/15 08:49 PM
1

try 2 with np links: Well,I'm going to play devils advocate here for a moment (even though I am mostly a MRA) at 2X,often criticized here on MRs this also got posted;and has resulted in a similar discussion np.reddit.com/r/TwoXChromosomes/comments/2rqfbb/taking_council_to_court_over_women_only_gym/ 2X isn't that bad,just like MR isn't bad
/r/MensRights08/01/15 05:58 PM
3

Actually,it's a pretty big deal for the person He had a 3+1 screen setup,anyone who spends that amount of care for his PC obviously loves it Though,it's still worth it..kinda
/r/MensRights08/01/15 04:04 PM
2

I'd like a burger,hold the union though - I had enough of that on reddit
/r/MensRights08/01/15 04:01 PM
1

Sorry,but the "issue" you raised here was 1 instance of "his" over "their" - this post may have better as a text post,considering: It had questions like "FATHER'S last known address", "FATHER'S last known place of work", FATHER'S criminal history", "FATHER'S drug history", etc. Are those gender neutral as well? I can clearly see how Jessica can consider this screenshot to be complaining;perhaps even whining and distracting from real issues (such as the line quoted above) I have raised this point…
/r/MensRights08/01/15 03:54 PM
13

In context it's not important,in general it is important
/r/MensRights08/01/15 03:44 PM
2

Is my favorite. I've always been saying that, if you want more women in gaming, the best way is not to make a Youtube video asking for it, but to become a game developer yourself. You accomplish so much more than making a video and getting people upset. I've been following GamerGate closely,and I can safely say that Anita Sarkisiaan has personally set back the dialogue at least 10 years,and is cashing in like hell on it I would like to see less digital dualism, which perpetuates the fallacy that…
/r/MensRights07/01/15 08:19 AM
1

I manspread,and I'm proud of it Why? because in the end,I'll often give my seat up for an elderly person,I often occupy handicapped seats on the bus for the same purpose,so I can give it up for someone who needs it so a jackass wont refuse to do so
/r/MensRights07/01/15 08:00 AM
1

Haijacking the top comment here to say: I recommend everyone to pick up some literature regarding feminism/mensrights,refer to the sidebar for some advice
/r/MensRights30/12/14 06:50 PM
1

To the remaining people in this thread:I'll get back to you guys later and mulling things over some more considering more length and complexity to consider
/r/MensRights23/12/14 09:29 PM
1

Point in case,MRA isn't opposing feminism,and nobody else is
/r/MensRights23/12/14 07:15 AM
1

Oh,derp forgot that for a moment,still surfs up dude,catch some waves with the little dudes
/r/MensRights09/12/14 07:49 PM
1

Whats the deal with you and anonymouse?
/r/MensRights09/12/14 05:17 PM
-1

MRAs have different kinds of stereotyping,I'm referring to the women hating loudmouth stereotype that some MRAs seem to be found of being - by no means all of them though
/r/MensRights09/12/14 05:01 PM
0

I didn't bother to google it,so pretty much
/r/MensRights09/12/14 04:57 PM
0

did i miss something?
/r/MensRights09/12/14 04:57 PM
-2

Are you sure? I've seen MRAs who are borderline radical,not vocal forefront spokesperson - but individual people rather,it's less noticeable but present
/r/MensRights09/12/14 11:29 AM
0

Some of us,sadly are - we need to educate and campaign,not shout down opposition like our radical enemies
/r/MensRights09/12/14 10:44 AM
-1

So doing the same as radical feminists is good? :/
/r/MensRights09/12/14 10:21 AM
2

When they divorced, she was left to care for the couple’s young son and her daughter from a previous relationship, who Mr Vince treated as his own during their marriage. To be fair,he could help out for the sake of the kids if he cared for them,but not for the bitch - that would be stupid,or if he likes them just take the kids in the kids referred in OP are post-divorce,she seems to have 4 kids,dafuq The court heard Miss Wyatt found a new partner in 1993 and had two more children with him – but …
/r/MensRights09/12/14 08:17 AM
-1

I'm talking about people who just go from arguing proper arguments to absurd ones like "all feminsts want to see men die" or some other overgeneralizing bullcrap or people who claim the modern (toxic) feminists are all feminists - or assuming there is no middle ground or other crap like that that quickly disolves into uncivil and unproductive discussion regarding subjects and ends up horrible
/r/MensRights08/12/14 05:19 PM
1

I've voiced my concern that some of the more extreme MRAs are damaging the general movement and reinforcing stereotypes - am I going over the line because of this?
/r/MensRights08/12/14 03:30 PM
3

obligatory it gets better Now that's out of the way,have a puppy http://oninonline.com/assets/macexplorer.com-puppy-dog-26.jpg
/r/MensRights08/12/14 03:26 PM
0

Actually,the resources are available online so that argument is pretty moot,it's just a narrow focus - not exclusion
/r/MensRights04/12/14 08:32 PM
1

not doubting the credibility of the source why are you quoting things without context/your opinions/adding anything of substance? there is a main source going around which i read,and I didn't notice this was a different source,ergo your jerk attitude was not needed
/r/MensRights04/12/14 08:31 PM
1

Is it illegal though? blarg,it sounds so illegal..yet isn't >.> Anyways,I'm not sure what to respond anymore.....so message of the day: be kind to your fellow man,support good charities and help to get biases out of charities
/r/MensRights04/12/14 06:10 PM
1

Have a upvote then :) - door to door/street collections are more common here in holland,so every time I see one I just empty out all my coins (usually totaling around 2-10 euros)
/r/MensRights04/12/14 06:03 PM
1

There are several sources of this story floating around and this one is completely different from ones I've read- why the fuck were you even quoting it exactly if you're not even adding any opinions/thoughts/whatever?
/r/MensRights04/12/14 06:01 PM
0

Well funded shelters for women will inevitably be ran by feminists, who will have no shame in using the funding intended for the shelters to fund campaigns against the creation of men's shelters, for example by hiring other feminists and then allowing them to spend their working hours to campaign against the creation of centers for men. As a dutch person myself,I highly doubt that,most shelters have charity status right? I'm not a lawyer but that sounds illegal
/r/MensRights04/12/14 10:59 AM
1

source?
/r/MensRights04/12/14 10:33 AM
1

Please consider donating to other charities then - there are still people that need help
/r/MensRights04/12/14 10:32 AM
0

115 shelters to aiding women. And 4 for men. I'm assuming you mean domestic violence shelters? thats a common issue sadly,otherwise a total 119 shelters is a low amount on it's own right depending on the cohuntry So what if they build care facilities for women? it would be a short fight to get that to be broken down and be open for all because off the blatant discrimination
/r/MensRights04/12/14 10:30 AM
0

I apologize for any offence I may have given as a result of it. Yay polite conversation! :D :P It is my belief that the reason that women would feel uncomfortable being around a well-behaved teenage male, but not a well-behaved teenage female is because of sexism. I don't think these women hate men, they've just been taught that men are bad, dangerous, predatory, etc. and they believe it. I thought, because you defended that position, that you felt this a reasonable position for these women to h…
/r/MensRights04/12/14 08:45 AM
1

Again.I don't support the decision,but I understand why it was made,understanding doesn't mean commending it I mean,I understand why hitler wanted to take over the world,doesn't mean I like him I apologize if my phrasing might seem different,but my point is I understand why it happened and why we should work both on removing biases and helping shelters so they don't have to turn people away even when 100% full The focus here is just "this is anti male sexism" while the focus could be more on "wh…
/r/MensRights04/12/14 07:36 AM
1

I'm sorry,but what the fuck? You can't hit a gay guy? you can't hit girls? defending your girlfriend is a hate crime against a gay guy? what country do you live in? Point is,it's his girlfriend and he should stand up to him,her boobs belong to her and nobody else - you need to focus on that
/r/MensRights04/12/14 07:30 AM
1

The overall feel of this promotion doesn't seem like the usual "ZOMG GURLS DONT CODE" but rather "hey girls,want to check out coding?" and while I can't find the actual resources online nor any kind of login system,I think they would be available freely for anyone to access It's not as much exclusion as a narrow focus
/r/MensRights04/12/14 07:27 AM
0

Lack of resources is always a problem for any shelter at all times, but the core problem is how society views men. Don't you think if the shelter had more resources,they could/would have accommodated them? while it is a problem overall,in this instance the bigger problem is a lack of resources What about rooms for people who don't want to be around others of different races? A black room and a white room? Or maybe a room for straight men to get away from gay men because they feel uncomfortable i…
/r/MensRights04/12/14 07:21 AM
1

Eeerm,how about "stop moterboating my girlfriends tits before i smack you up?" - it's not an gay/bi issue,it's a "keep your hands off my girlfriend"
/r/MensRights03/12/14 09:22 PM
1

It's not exclusion at it's core,I mean it doesn't even mention any crap about how "women are excluded"
/r/MensRights03/12/14 09:20 PM
2

To my knowledge, there is not a single pre-scripted scene in the game featuring any playable character harming a woman. Yet this game gets pulled from shelves for "encouraging violence against women"... Joga,nuff said
/r/MensRights03/12/14 07:59 PM
1

I mean,racists moderated (as in,kept in balance) the black rights movements,same with homophobes,but only old geezers blocked feminists at first but then got unopposed after the few died off As a gay guy,I actually have to admit that homophobes have helped the rights movement a lot by being general jackasses and giving the general anti-gay people a sense of "well,I'm against it and don't have to like it,but I'll allow it" which is basically saying "well,you're equal but I don't have to like it"
/r/MensRights03/12/14 07:57 PM
2

It's refreshing to see a nice discussion with supported data,recently I have had a lot of encounters with horrible MRAs >.>
/r/MensRights03/12/14 06:07 PM
1

Frankly,I think the biggest problem with the feminist movement is that there is no counter-movement such as other movements have faced,and it has largely spireled out of hand as evidenced by the excessive coverage in the media while the problem has been mostly fixed
/r/MensRights03/12/14 06:05 PM
-1

Because when put in context,it makes sense Would you want someone of the opposite gender gawking at your privates? (assuming you're a guy from the typing style and expression mannerisms) would you like to have a women looking at you while you change in a locker room at a gym,swimming pool or other place?
/r/MensRights03/12/14 05:46 PM
-1

When placed into a racist context,yes - would you want to have someone staring into your bedroom window when you change?
/r/MensRights03/12/14 05:20 PM
-1

On one hand,yes it's selective On another,is it really that suprising? there is certainly some stereotyping of women can't program around that simply won't die off And this is a good fix for that - it doesn't mention the stereotype at all but simply encourages women to code that otherwise might not even would have tried
/r/MensRights03/12/14 04:34 PM
1

Oh hai mranazi,how are things going with you this fine day?
/r/MensRights03/12/14 04:21 PM
1

Actually,I never heard of it myself - I'm dutch.got anything there? this is interesting stuff,and I'm happy to see a person dedicated to facts rather then shouting down a differing view
/r/MensRights03/12/14 04:19 PM
1

Woa,completely forgot about this comment,19 days ago,did you have a nice nap mate? :P Okay,so you're completely right about the voter turnout,while there are substantially more women voters (although not an overwhelming majority) what are the actual sympathies? How many voters are actually feminist? more women voters do give an edge towards female friendly politicians - but that doesn't mean feminist influence For example,pro-choice might seem more appealing to non-conservative women then some c…
/r/MensRights03/12/14 04:18 PM
1

At this moment - while I'm not a lawyer - I think it's more important to protect the kids and just take it for the moment In the end,it will help the possible end case if there is more evidence of wrong doing,and all the investigated claims that turned out false can aid in proving that the female is unfit to be a mother
/r/MensRights03/12/14 04:09 PM
-3

Are you seriously comparing me to a racist? yeah that's going to help in a civil discussion
/r/MensRights03/12/14 04:07 PM
-2

Let me put it simply: The turning away of teenagers isn't the core problem here,it is certainly a problem but it's part of a much bigger problem: lack of resources I mean,why can't they house families in a single room? because they dont have the resources to do so
/r/MensRights03/12/14 04:06 PM
3

read the rest mate
/r/MensRights03/12/14 04:03 PM
8

Why? as someone who has been in and out courts a lot in my youth,it's good advice - especially with young children,the cop gave sound advice Having said that,a lawyer and keeping track of documents would be good in case it gets out of hand edit:right,the told the women to look out for the men,well that is an entirely different case,I was responding to this: I asked the police officer if I could file charges for false claims, but they said it would not be recommended because it would be bad for t…
/r/MensRights03/12/14 10:32 AM
5

Are there any other things you could file for that don't involve the kids? you should get a lawyer to look at the situation
/r/MensRights03/12/14 10:30 AM
-5

while I'm going through poverty Come on,if you're going through hell,the last thing you want is some teenager around you even if he isn't eyeballing you - if I was a women I would feel seriously uncomfortable in a womens section in a shelter even with the most well behaved teenager I'm not defending the shelter here,they should have accommodated him regardless,perhaps put up a screen in the womens section for the entire family or something like that - my point is,to some degree I understand wher…
/r/MensRights03/12/14 10:27 AM
-9

So he's a potential rapist in the women's section because he's male. No,because he's a teenager in puberty,if i was a women I wouldn't want a horny teenager near me while I'm going through poverty The article doesn't mention him being a potential rapist,to quote They said he's too old to stay on the women's side, because of the women running around in their pajamas I understand their reasoning for it - but it doesn't make it right
/r/MensRights03/12/14 08:24 AM
1

for proof of point 1,refer to the downvoted comment at the bottom of the page essentially saying feminist should kill themselfs
/r/MensRights02/12/14 01:09 PM
1

A lot of this,I can't argue against as it's pretty accurate Though,there is a clear distinction between modern and non-modern feminism Modern feminism is about superiority under the ruse of equality,the sufferages have been won and the remaining equality problems are dissolving if any at all Historical feminism has reached their goals,frankly the feminist movement shouldn't have to fix men gender roles - but at the flipside people who are for equality should get more involved in MRA considering …
/r/MensRights02/12/14 01:07 PM
2

And ofcourse,while doing be polite stay with the facts and only the facts (it's what sets us apart from toxic feminists) keep up to date and educate yourself
/r/MensRights02/12/14 11:09 AM
2

Just me,or is there no mention of gender at all? or am i just blind?
/r/MensRights02/12/14 11:06 AM
6

so I advocate for rights for women and men if either faces inequality in society, although I tend to concentrate on men's rights because I feel the Men's Rights Movement has a further way to go. I see a lot of talk about feminism, but we should not be defining the MRM by what feminists are actively seeking. All that will do is make us look like we are trying to hold women down, when what the goal of the MRM should be is to raise men up. People pick sides and say that either men or women face equ…
/r/MensRights02/12/14 10:52 AM
1

Maybe we have difference definitions of anti-male When I hear anti-male,I think "down with men/oppress men" and while modern feminism has adopted such views,non modern feminism hasn't (i mean the sufferages)
/r/MensRights02/12/14 10:39 AM
1

why is the draft even a thing in america? not a lot of fighting going on these days The rest is solid stuff
/r/MensRights02/12/14 07:32 AM
1

every movement has them,regardless of intentions mensrights are about mensrights,not fuck those feminists rights,if I'm against a republican legislation it doesn't mean I'm inherently anti-republican And although feminist discrimination is an issiue,I would say it's more about misinformation at it's core rather then actually fighting feminism it's part of the reason,but the bystander effect is the primary problem in my opinion https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bystander_effect
/r/MensRights02/12/14 07:30 AM
2

Removing the abusive sentencing of the for profit prison system and how it makes money off of what could be considered slave labor, since the workers are making less than a dollar an hour usually. Although an issue,I don't find it a mensrights issue
/r/MensRights02/12/14 07:24 AM
2

Feminism is inherently anti-male I have to highly disagree,there are (a lot of) toxic elements that are anti-male,but inherently feminism isn't anti-male at it's core I haven't met a non modern feminist that is anti-male,it's only those toxic modern feminists who are anti-male
/r/MensRights02/12/14 07:22 AM
0

Sure feminazi,bye
/r/MensRights02/12/14 07:19 AM
-1

I am? you're the one downvoting my comments because you can't think of a proper counter argument after I linked to the UK law and you're using an argumentum ad populum fallacy Come on,prove me wrong,or are you just another troll like feminazis?
/r/MensRights01/12/14 09:16 PM
-2

the hardcore elements in MRA that effectively compare to feminazis in terms of extremism that we should condemn no,this is simply not true and will only serve to reinforce negative stereotypes no,its a general psychological principle,similar when there is an accident and everyone assumes that someone has called 911 - when in fact nobody has
/r/MensRights01/12/14 09:11 PM
0

Also: https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/bandwagon
/r/MensRights01/12/14 09:09 PM
0

No you're wrong http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1971/48/section/1 A person who without lawful excuse destroys or damages any property belonging to another intending to destroy or damage any such property or being reckless as to whether any such property would be destroyed or damaged shall be guilty of an offence. Do you have an lawful excuse to destroy this poster? Also: https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/bandwagon
/r/MensRights01/12/14 08:56 PM
1

get rid of the assholes that give us a bad name get the masses to understand we're not inherently anti-feminist and fight our own,separate issues as well get rid of the bystander effect in equal rights in general,people assume representation of men and other major groups,effectively ridding them of representation
/r/MensRights01/12/14 08:50 PM
0

Oh? you actually have an counter argument as to why I'm wrong? please, do share?
/r/MensRights01/12/14 08:46 PM
0

It's assholes like you who give MRAs a bad name
/r/MensRights01/12/14 07:12 AM
-4

It is,it was put up by the police edit:also,keep on downvoting mate,it's people like you who hurt mensrights the most with stereotypes
/r/MensRights30/11/14 09:28 PM
-3

It is,it's clearly damaging public property
/r/MensRights30/11/14 09:14 PM
-6

Though I don't got statistics on it,I think the majority is non consensual - it's a good policy but should expend to both genders
/r/MensRights30/11/14 09:13 PM
-9

don't - even if it's sexist,you should obey the law and not damage public property
/r/MensRights30/11/14 05:37 PM
-3

It's a good policy to consider drunk sex non consensual- because it often is,although it should extend to men as well
/r/MensRights30/11/14 05:37 PM
2

this. good solid advice which you should follow
/r/MensRights26/11/14 03:44 PM
1

I got so much happyer once I came out of the closet and finding to be accepted by everyone - and even if you're not going to be accepted there are always bastions you can hold onto be it certain friends or several online communities
/r/MensRights26/11/14 02:06 PM
0

Look in the thread The denied vote is clear discrimination ofcourse,but the missing representation is just an fallacious assumption of ever present representation of men because of the bystander effect
/r/MensRights25/11/14 07:09 AM
-7

When you look deeper at it (at possible the most fancy comment I have ever made) you will see there is a weird difference in the two statements A fallacious assumption is not on purpose but rather stigma while denying the representation of men would be discrimination Point being,it sucks and we should fight against it,but it's not discrimination on itself
/r/MensRights24/11/14 09:26 PM
8

The denied vote is clear discrimination ofcourse,but the missing representation is just an fallacious assumption of ever present representation of men because of the bystander effect
/r/MensRights24/11/14 09:06 PM
0

Moral of the story: Come out the closet sooner,the weather is nice outside :)
/r/MensRights24/11/14 09:03 PM
-25

clear discrimination Discrimination? no. Clear oversight and fallacious assumption men are represented? yes
/r/MensRights24/11/14 09:01 PM
0

Oh,to moderation:sorry about the cursing - got a touch upset at the negative stereotype this guy represents
/r/MensRights24/11/14 08:57 PM
0

I'd like to prefix this with a hearty fuck you for making our cause harder by reinforcing the negative anti-feminist stereotype of MRA Feminism is about giving women the best of everything Modern feminism* and most of your points are only applicable to modern feminism If feminism is about equality, why is it called FEMINism? Why would a gender equality movement have a certain gender right in the name? Yeah,why would a movement dedicated to equal rights for a certain type have the certain name in…
/r/MensRights24/11/14 08:56 PM
0

Pretty much sums it up
/r/MensRights24/11/14 08:39 PM
1

I have suggested my friend to identify rather as "humanist" - although sadly she doesn't want to considering the label being forced upon her
/r/MensRights24/11/14 05:09 PM
-1

Feminism is inherently anti-man. No it isn't inherently feminism is about equality of the female gender with the male gender - it has been haijacked by bad people that blamish the good nature of feminist that has actually improve the equality landscape decades ago and have laid the groundwork for other equality movements such as gay rights and anti- racial segregation While I admit feminists didn't directly influence those movements,they have normalized the norm for protesting inequality,sadly t…
/r/MensRights24/11/14 05:08 PM
1

which is why he still believes feminism is in full support of gender equality for everyone. Every time I hear this,I lose more hope for the MR movements Why can't there be good feminists? I hapen to know someone who is an very intellectual women and yet a feminist;she doesn't buy into the general consensus of X is sexist or any other modern feminism bullcrap and does her own research before making any statement regarding the subject "modern feminism" is pure toxic, "feminism" in itself is not an…
/r/MensRights24/11/14 03:52 PM
2

Eh? as a man there is no abortion to be made - at most the right being violated here is the decision of child support,if a person isn't ready for kids he shouldn't be forced into it nor have to pay child support
/r/MensRights23/11/14 05:35 PM
3

It's a good start,maybe we should get a meta post to organize these things and get a full FUA (Frequently Used Arguments) thread as a sticky/sidebar post
/r/MensRights23/11/14 12:19 PM
3

I would love it if you would create a much larger general mensrights resource compilation considering the amount of good,solid research you do I mean a big list regarding mensrights including common arguments against us and their counters including links to solid evidence (preferably a credible research organization or government) - it would save a lot of people a lot of time
/r/MensRights23/11/14 09:12 AM
2

Circumcision is an health right,not reproductive (it's classified as a medical procedure and it should be your own decision) Again,what do you mean with "reproductive rights"? it's a broad term
/r/MensRights23/11/14 09:05 AM
1

You mean as in lesbian okay,gay not?
/r/MensRights23/11/14 09:02 AM
3

It's too bad that men haven't been afforded the same rights over their bodies and reproductive freedoms though. Eh what? did I miss something or what?
/r/MensRights22/11/14 10:00 AM
1

Old gender roles - "protect women and give them privacy" and that women privates are moreso private Like I said,i thibk it was put in a long time ago
/r/MensRights22/11/14 10:00 AM
1

Honestly,I'm in the middle here - on one hand it should be the same - on the other I can see why it was done and it was likely put in years and years ago when these things well much less of an issiue I would say bring it up with the school,but that's going to be horrible for OP in all likelyhood - so maybe filing a complaint would be appropriate
/r/MensRights21/11/14 07:42 AM
1

We can't. and that's why we are doing good In the end,we will fix equality,who will take credit? feminists ofcourse - but is it that bad knowing you helped? that you are the unsung hero's of it all?
/r/MensRights21/11/14 07:39 AM
1

Now you know what MODERN feminism is
/r/MensRights21/11/14 07:35 AM
2

Wouldn't this also fall under filing incorrect reports and perjury? I'm assuming those reports count as under oath?
/r/MensRights19/11/14 08:02 AM
2

So you're saying gay people are degenerates? are you kidding me?
/r/MensRights19/11/14 07:57 AM
1

tbh not much - the main problem in mensrights is the under representation of men i think
/r/MensRights18/11/14 02:12 PM
1

Mental health - not really(coming from someone inside an open institute) Rape - big taboo for men access to services - assuming you mean hospitals? not much difference
/r/MensRights18/11/14 01:39 PM
1

Eh,I meant in general - this guy is an exception that proves the rule I actually haven't seen much disregard for men in the workplace;honestly it seems exaggerated (but,like any good person in a discussion,willing to change my view if presented with enough evidence to the contrary),then again like i said,the bystander effect
/r/MensRights18/11/14 12:57 PM
1

Frankly not really The fact that most workplace deaths are males is a natural and logical result of the characteristics of men - and while work conditions could improve,I doubt there is any real disregard for their safety In general,I doubt there is even any real disregard for males - it's because of the bystander effect that there is no real representation for males,men are in an obvious majority in the world,so everyone just assumes men are represented properly,but they aren't really
/r/MensRights18/11/14 07:23 AM
2

Ironically,what most call a burqa is actually an hijab - I know this without being a muslim
/r/MensRights17/11/14 05:22 PM
1

I'm serious about opening one,it's a simple process in matchmaking people into being dominated with a house to be cleaned and an employee to direct work (although people probably wouldnt want to see it,so it would need to be planned so they arent home)
/r/MensRights17/11/14 09:14 AM
0

You know what the stupid part is about feminists being so loud? they are actually helping bring equality in a roundabout way - hear me out on this It's basically the same effect as the west baro church had on christianity in general - the extremists give moderation to the rest,although it's much bigger and roundabout effect with feminists I would say female equality currently rests at -1 at some parts and +1 in others parts The -1 is slowly disappearing due to the generational problems (the very…
/r/MensRights17/11/14 09:03 AM
2

The point isn't "how many good feminists there are", it's IF you meet one, don't be a needless jackass about it. And you fully understood my point!
/r/MensRights17/11/14 08:49 AM
1

I'm actually trying to discuss now,not trying to dismiss the link this time - I'd like to see my argument countered? Divorce rulings are - when taken to court - a lot more favorable towards women due to the natural bias towards protecting women,and in many cases alimony payments can cause financial trouble for the person paying it;therefore taking it to court and ruling in the womens favor in all likelyhood In this example,the so called "wage gap" is a double edged sword whether it exists or not…
/r/MensRights17/11/14 08:47 AM
2

Actually, I think a BDSM maid service would be a fantastic idea. I like this idea...wanne open one?
/r/MensRights16/11/14 09:29 PM
3

Sadly yes And sadly,good MRAs are rare as well considering the karma on my comment,calling for civility to help our case is apparently bad
/r/MensRights16/11/14 09:22 PM
1

Retail of? it all depends on details For example,a sports store wouldn't have people in ties,but jewelry would be perfectly acceptable in moderate
/r/MensRights16/11/14 09:21 PM
2

Consider the following:mining is a male dominated profession,as such more male workers would die as a direct result as such directly proportionally to the miner population - when put in relation,the same percentage of female miners that die like men (though,I don't have statistics to back this up,but it's a logical assumption) Considering that,why would workplace deaths be an mens rights issue when most dangerous occupations are dominated by men? I don't see a issue here with the rights of men i…
/r/MensRights16/11/14 09:18 PM
1

You stole the words right out my mouth - you sure you aren't a feminist? :P <---obvious humor
/r/MensRights16/11/14 09:10 PM
9

I'm wondering something: How the fuck did anyone believe that was an actual drunk person? the make-up was seriously exgatterated and no professional makeup artist would do it like that source:I'm a homosexual male
/r/MensRights16/11/14 09:09 PM
18

Hijacking the first comment to say this: There are good feminists out there who do healty research on the subject and who are open to a differing viewpoints Please use a neutral attitude when discussing with feminists,and adjust as needed - MRA doesn't need more negative attention >.>
/r/MensRights16/11/14 09:06 PM
1

The post you mentioned would be a post on the edge,while it is a disparity in the workforce,it's not much about mensrights in general,but can evolve into a healthy discussion as to why/how it happens Point is,to start a discussion,provide a proper kick to it - for example a description stating your opinions on the subject including statistics and such
/r/MensRights16/11/14 09:45 AM
1

Like I said,actual inequality issues - like the example if female miners would be compensated,but not male ones
/r/MensRights16/11/14 09:40 AM
-1

So fucking what? you're clogging up the fucking subreddit with this unrelated crap that has near nothing to do with mensrights - things like this happen all the time and unless something happened like female miners getting compensations while male miners didn't,it doesn't belong here
/r/MensRights15/11/14 05:27 PM
-1

The fuck does this have to do here?
/r/MensRights15/11/14 04:43 PM
1

Police would only get involved if the person attacked filed a report I highly doubt it's a mens right issiue here,my guess is those 15 minutes were spend being flabbergasted before someone reported it,then the staff would be scrambling to figure out what to do (how often does a person get maced in a freaking movie theater?) You're just assuming things of which you got no further info,and assuming the worst at that
/r/MensRights14/11/14 03:40 PM
0

Isn't that..you know illegal?
/r/MensRights14/11/14 02:42 PM
2

Or,you could consider they just lack the response time?,I highly doubt they would want to tackle a situation where the guilty party is violent and has a weapon Moreso,the article doesn't even mention who or when the incident was brought to the attention of the staff - reporting an incident wouldn't be on the mind if the guy was maced right into the face,I'd rather go seek medical attention first or get it out of my eyes There is no important details in this article that related to MR in general …
/r/MensRights14/11/14 02:39 PM
1

this
/r/MensRights14/11/14 07:55 AM
2

Yeah no,unless there is an actual rights violation,this is just a case of assault - nothing to do with the rights of men (it would be a different story if the man was thrown out for example)
/r/MensRights14/11/14 07:53 AM
2

How about some vote statistics to back up the argument,vote eligibility doesn't mean a high turnout
/r/MensRights13/11/14 09:03 PM
2

The "false accusations" tag is more for posts about that got proven innocent;there is still an reasonable doubt around it as more then a single person is doing the accusations
/r/MensRights13/11/14 08:58 PM
-2

So,anyone mind explaining why the fuck this is relevant to MR?
/r/MensRights13/11/14 07:44 PM
1

Actually,I doubt there are more then 1k people actually reading/commenting - the top post has 2k upvotes atm but I think it got much outside exposure,the next one dips below 200
/r/MensRights06/11/14 08:02 PM
3

As someone named Rutger,I'm sorry
/r/MensRights06/11/14 07:51 PM
2

Hold on,the fuck are you thinking about me? that I'm some nutjob thinking men are guilty because they are men? do you really think I would allow such prosecution on myself? - I'm expressing the wish for a more perfect system and lamenting there is none
/r/MensRights06/11/14 07:15 AM
1

There is none,note the should
/r/MensRights05/11/14 09:15 PM
3

irrefutable evidence first,innocent until prove otherwise second
/r/MensRights05/11/14 08:27 PM
1

no,see response to Arakin
/r/MensRights05/11/14 08:26 PM
1

Point being there should be a much better system - although burden of proof on the accused is plainly stupid
/r/MensRights05/11/14 08:26 PM
3

From what I know,female drivers are more often injured when accidents happen - mostly because they wear their seat belts improperly because boobs but pink roads? dafuq,just imagen having one of these running nextdoor,happy morning dude
/r/MensRights05/11/14 06:14 PM
-7

Quite frankly,I'm met with mixed feelings on this,mostly "good going" but also doubt - maybe we're also letting some actual rapists go un-punished with this Rapists shouldn't walk away - but false accusations shouldn't go either
/r/MensRights05/11/14 06:10 PM
1

My point exactly - none - there should be one just as there should be a women issues one
/r/MensRights03/11/14 07:49 AM
1

You're missing the point entirely,around the mensrights reddits people think all feminists are bad,and I for one disagree with that - feminists have made huge differences historically I'm commenting on feminists in general,not in regards to the draft
/r/MensRights02/11/14 06:37 PM
1

I'm not commenting on the draft - general feminism is what I was aiming at
/r/MensRights02/11/14 04:05 PM
1

You have to row with the things given to us,otherwise life wouldn't be as fun
/r/MensRights02/11/14 11:25 AM
2

On one side,I would agree - it shows the admin staff favoring one ideology over another,on the other hand it's one of the few women issues sub-reddits as an default
/r/MensRights02/11/14 11:16 AM
2

People seem to always confuse current day feminists and the feminists of the old times "feminism" - sufferages "modern feminism" - feminists that do stuff somewhere?
/r/MensRights02/11/14 11:09 AM
7

Man,back off the good feminists - we should fight against bad feminists,not the ones that actually made a good proper difference such as voting rights
/r/MensRights01/11/14 07:49 PM
1

Did he attend AA meetings? I recall them giving out special coins as X year sober rewards If the kids are old enough,throw everything at the court so they ask their wishes Also,I'm not familiar with international law,but my parents had a rather messy divorce and my mom moved for the court to appoint a legal guardian from the state to act in my (then underage) interests - deciding things like visitation rights and education (especially education considering I got autism)
/r/MensRights30/10/14 10:54 AM
2

This is actually a really good idea,no use in being sad at home - go out among people,and do some good while you're at it!
/r/MensRights30/10/14 10:47 AM
3

fucking hell,that is all i can say about this
/r/MensRights30/10/14 10:33 AM
1

some are grammer nazi's,some are femnazi's,some are even outright nazi's (who knew?) I'm keep-reddits-tidy-nazi
/r/MensRights30/10/14 10:25 AM
1

You wot mate? while the claims of advocating for LGBT people are false;who the hell does even expect them to advocate for it? feminism is about women equal rights (just noting here:I prefer to modern feminism as modern feminism,feminism in general i call feminism)
/r/MensRights30/10/14 09:47 AM
2

he cross-posted it himself: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/2kpqu7/abuse_video_removed_from_youtube_for_supporting/
/r/MensRights30/10/14 09:36 AM
1

And Sam Pepper is still out there
/r/MensRights30/10/14 09:26 AM
2

Thank god for working in a small company
/r/MensRights25/10/14 01:37 PM
6

Warehouse labour isn't unskilled as much as you would think,I work in the detail shipping (sending mailboxes for a webshop) and you really have to pay attention to what you're doing because messups are costly,some orders are to big apartment complexes as well,often 20-50 mailboxes (with the biggest I saw was around 500 standard green ones)
/r/MensRights25/10/14 01:14 PM
3

Lauren Loughheed, the solicitor with Leigh Day who is leading the case, said that the pay difference between shop and warehouse workers could be as much as £4 an hour. Nope,not a good statistic if it's just guesswork That's a big difference when you are earning £7 an hour. And, if the cases are successful, women workers could be compensated for six years of back pay. Especially if the amount it's being compared to isn't even accurate,I mean is 7 a median? average? the bottom floor? the ceiling?
/r/MensRights25/10/14 01:12 PM
1

On the actual pay for men/women in warehouses/stores I agree with warehouse employees being paid better - but want some more details and facts :) <3 statistics
/r/MensRights25/10/14 12:58 PM
1

Statistics?
/r/MensRights25/10/14 12:19 PM
2

Media reports what is demanded - it's stupid but true
/r/MensRights22/10/14 07:46 PM
1

You know,fuck that noise,go for it Explain your position and back it up,don't go argue with her but provide the facts and pile it all up with evidence
/r/MensRights22/10/14 04:55 PM
2

Though,after doing some research I have to say ActionAid is too biased towards women (like only hiring only women,doubling the percentage of female workers from 12% to 24%)
/r/MensRights22/10/14 04:52 PM
-6

I'm not seeing any sympathizing here,rather stating the obvious You do a stupid thing,you get hurt
/r/MensRights22/10/14 04:50 PM
-4

Could this be flagged as a misleading title? The bias in the article is negligible The term "romance tourism" actually seems to refer to the act of going to a different country to date the local population - it does seperate out the actual sex tourism: In many cases, money is handled discreetly so that the women can preserve the fantasy of the romance. Other times, it is far more explicit, with women paying the men directly for sex. Moreso,it does provide actual examples of romance being prefere…
/r/MensRights22/10/14 04:46 PM
2

Some of the specific phrasings he uses seem to be almost exclusively used by MRAs . He writes, for example, of the “toxic influence of feminism,” a phrase that only turns up 47 results on Google. Bolded was a link,but didn't turn up 47 results,it turned up 785 - removing the citation marks (which says to google to find the exact phrase and nothing else) turns up 18.5 million results So much fail,even when stacking the results in their favor
/r/MensRights16/10/14 03:51 PM
2

Dunno if it's a relable source,so if anyone has a better one,please share http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/10/09/microsoft-ceo-women-asking-raises_n_5962476.html "It’s not really about asking for the raise, but knowing and having faith that the system will actually give you the right raises as you go along," Nadella told a crowd at the Grace Hopper Celebration of Women in Computing, ReadWrite reported. "That's good karma. It will come back," Nadella continued. "That's the kind of person that I…
/r/MensRights12/10/14 02:57 PM
2

I'm not quick to say this....but this might actually be a PR stunt for #heforshe It's seriously time for everyone to focus on other things,you know like ending world hunger
/r/MensRights24/09/14 08:25 PM
2

Also,we should make a gigantic list of facts to link towards;including any and all sources (i'm not aware of any existing currently)
/r/MensRights20/09/14 04:42 PM
2

this is the main reason for why I argued in a other thread we should "stop" discussing with feminists and bombard them with evidence rather then talk to them female workers get paid less then male counterparts --labeled link with evidence to the countrary-- Sensible people will read the evidence;the people that don't you won't have to spend time on
/r/MensRights20/09/14 04:40 PM
1

Taken down? site doesn't work it seems
/r/MensRights17/09/14 10:41 AM
1

Not helpful,we're here for pure equality;not ragging on feminists
/r/MensRights17/09/14 06:55 AM
1

The best way I can sum up the question is "wage equality in relation to competence" - which Lrellok in the other comment thread has shown pretty well,and with evidence Having said that,you're a reasonable person and you should keep discussing stuff because we need more reasonable people :P
/r/MensRights17/09/14 06:54 AM
1

missed those links,thanks,I quite like you,you do good research - I'll bookmark this for future reference
/r/MensRights15/09/14 10:07 AM
2

Someone else in this post already has found something conclusive
/r/MensRights15/09/14 09:36 AM
2

I'm talking regarding hourly rates - if a man and a woman produce equal amounts,do they get the same hourly rate?,for example if a female sale person is more social and knowledgeable then a male one,does she get paid more? and how about the other way around?
/r/MensRights15/09/14 09:07 AM
1

I second this request for an explanation,your source has no mention of gender - just the living wage for a family
/r/MensRights15/09/14 09:03 AM
1

This is exactly what I'm looking for! cold hard evidence to back up a argument! - though I have to ask:where is all this info sourced from?
/r/MensRights15/09/14 09:01 AM
1

[citation needed] That's the point here,I want to see evidence and actual studies
/r/MensRights15/09/14 07:00 AM
1

Do you see the irony here? You're acting like a extreme feminist yourself,the very thing we're fighting against on this subreddit Do NOT let anti-feminism consume your thoughts,but keep on fighting for true equality
/r/MensRights15/09/14 06:55 AM
1

Like you said - it's a legal defense So what if a weasily lawyer gets another person unjustly out of jail (/lesser) - the outrage here should be about the act,not the defense
/r/MensRights15/09/14 06:53 AM
1

Yes,this is why I raised the point;what is the actual comparison in productivity? If you're in a office,does a slacking guy still earn more then a hard working woman?
/r/MensRights15/09/14 06:52 AM
1

It was an example,point being is equal wage for equal productivity,yes or no?
/r/MensRights14/09/14 08:26 PM
1

I think we should just do a 180 turn and stop discussing about feminism Instead,just provide the statistics,the proof,the facts,every argument should be countered with cold hard credible evidence In doing so,the feminists that are actually misandrists get ridiculed by the world at large,while the feminists that want true equality will reach middle ground with mensrights
/r/MensRights14/09/14 07:19 PM
11

Okay guys,fuck off with the feminist bullcrap and focus on the IMPORTANT things here There is barely even much feministic about this,and it's distracting from the real facts: she killed a helpless child,an autistic child who can barely even talk So what if she uses a crappy defense? IT IS UNFORGIVABLE I love this subreddit,but focus on the important things,not feminism
/r/MensRights14/09/14 07:03 PM
0

which is to spread semen, isn't even needed. I would love to know how this works,maybe god will make a new jesus?
/r/MensRights31/07/14 10:23 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter