TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

CremasterGuy Archive

View 86 posts and 337 comments by CremasterGuy on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
449

CremasterGuy/r/MensRights15/01/13 12:27 PM
427

CremasterGuy/r/MensRights24/01/13 03:15 AM
303

CremasterGuy/r/MensRights10/10/12 12:19 PM
276

CremasterGuy/r/MensRights31/07/13 02:40 PM
267

CremasterGuy/r/MensRights25/04/13 11:58 AM
235

CremasterGuy/r/MensRights12/09/12 01:40 PM
230

CremasterGuy/r/MensRights27/06/13 01:07 PM
211

CremasterGuy/r/MensRights16/05/11 03:19 PM
184

CremasterGuy/r/MensRights14/03/13 11:36 AM
172

CremasterGuy/r/MensRights17/04/12 02:39 PM
167

CremasterGuy/r/MensRights09/05/11 02:40 PM
136

CremasterGuy/r/MensRights15/01/13 10:07 PM
131

CremasterGuy/r/MensRights18/11/11 11:48 AM
124

CremasterGuy/r/MensRights11/05/12 02:39 PM
115

CremasterGuy/r/MensRights09/01/12 10:38 PM
107

CremasterGuy/r/MensRights21/05/11 04:44 PM
93

CremasterGuy/r/MensRights26/05/11 11:07 AM
90

CremasterGuy/r/MensRights31/07/13 11:14 AM
88

CremasterGuy/r/MensRights21/02/11 05:16 PM
82

CremasterGuy/r/MensRights06/05/11 11:16 AM
81

CremasterGuy/r/MensRights23/05/11 01:45 PM
80

CremasterGuy/r/MensRights20/02/13 01:38 PM
75

CremasterGuy/r/MensRights07/04/10 11:56 AM
72

CremasterGuy/r/MensRights31/05/11 04:00 PM
70

CremasterGuy/r/MensRights30/04/11 05:19 PM
66

CremasterGuy/r/MensRights05/09/12 06:01 PM
65

CremasterGuy/r/MensRights22/07/13 11:26 PM
55

CremasterGuy/r/MensRights30/08/10 10:54 AM
52

CremasterGuy/r/MensRights20/04/12 11:52 AM
52

CremasterGuy/r/MensRights05/01/12 05:45 PM
50

CremasterGuy/r/MensRights03/04/11 01:08 AM
49

CremasterGuy/r/MensRights24/05/11 12:14 PM
45

CremasterGuy/r/MensRights09/04/10 09:16 PM
41

CremasterGuy/r/MensRights11/05/11 10:49 AM
40

CremasterGuy/r/MensRights22/08/11 12:10 AM
40

CremasterGuy/r/MensRights05/06/13 02:16 AM
37

CremasterGuy/r/MensRights15/01/13 03:29 PM
37

CremasterGuy/r/MensRights23/09/12 04:10 AM
36

CremasterGuy/r/MensRights16/05/11 03:18 PM
29

CremasterGuy/r/MensRights09/05/11 01:41 AM
28

CremasterGuy/r/MensRights29/04/10 02:21 PM
27

CremasterGuy/r/MensRights22/01/13 09:09 PM
27

CremasterGuy/r/MensRights05/12/12 01:50 PM
27

CremasterGuy/r/MensRights28/05/13 10:39 AM
21

CremasterGuy/r/MensRights03/04/11 01:09 AM
21

CremasterGuy/r/MensRights19/05/11 07:37 PM
21

CremasterGuy/r/MensRights25/07/11 12:22 AM
20

CremasterGuy/r/MensRights14/04/10 12:48 PM
19

CremasterGuy/r/MensRights29/08/11 08:57 PM
19

CremasterGuy/r/MensRights20/04/12 11:41 AM
18

CremasterGuy/r/MensRights05/10/12 06:56 PM
18

CremasterGuy/r/MensRights25/11/11 10:12 PM
17

CremasterGuy/r/MensRights28/04/11 04:18 PM
15

CremasterGuy/r/MensRights23/07/11 10:20 PM
15

CremasterGuy/r/MensRights20/05/11 03:27 PM
14

CremasterGuy/r/MensRights17/10/11 12:37 PM
13

CremasterGuy/r/MensRights22/03/13 04:41 PM
13

CremasterGuy/r/MensRights30/09/12 09:29 PM
12

CremasterGuy/r/MensRights09/06/12 04:56 PM
12

CremasterGuy/r/MensRights04/08/12 05:14 PM
11

CremasterGuy/r/MensRights15/01/13 04:29 PM
10

CremasterGuy/r/MensRights14/08/12 03:35 AM
10

CremasterGuy/r/MensRights30/08/11 04:41 PM
9

CremasterGuy/r/MensRights20/05/11 11:33 AM
9

CremasterGuy/r/MensRights22/06/12 03:22 AM
8

CremasterGuy/r/MensRights19/10/11 02:33 AM
8

CremasterGuy/r/MensRights13/04/13 07:30 PM
7

CremasterGuy/r/MensRights01/06/11 02:12 PM
7

CremasterGuy/r/MensRights18/11/11 03:01 AM
7

CremasterGuy/r/MensRights14/02/13 08:02 PM
7

CremasterGuy/r/MensRights27/02/12 08:26 PM
6

CremasterGuy/r/MensRights23/05/13 11:13 AM
6

CremasterGuy/r/MensRights24/07/12 03:18 AM
5

CremasterGuy/r/MensRights26/08/12 08:21 PM
2

CremasterGuy/r/MensRights03/04/11 01:37 AM
2

CremasterGuy/r/MensRights26/11/12 05:40 PM
1

CremasterGuy/r/MensRights28/03/11 09:02 PM
0

CremasterGuy/r/MensRights01/03/13 04:05 PM
0

CremasterGuy/r/MensRights11/07/13 03:20 AM
0

CremasterGuy/r/MensRights11/07/13 03:05 AM
0

CremasterGuy/r/MensRights23/05/13 01:52 PM
0

CremasterGuy/r/MensRights26/08/11 02:40 AM
0

CremasterGuy/r/MensRights30/04/12 12:17 PM
0

CremasterGuy/r/MensRights30/03/13 05:46 PM
0

CremasterGuy/r/MensRights10/04/13 02:10 AM
0

CremasterGuy/r/MensRights23/01/12 02:07 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
28

The double standard is this: it's widely accepted that nudity doesn't demean men--men aren't considered to possess, or be deserving of, dignity to begin with, so an ad with a naked dude isn't considered an affront to every male on the planet the way an ad with a naked woman is.
/r/MensRights15/05/15 02:03 PM
12

Best article on the subject I've seen.
/r/MensRights15/05/15 01:59 PM
1

Makes my skin crawl to read these people.
/r/MensRights18/07/14 09:00 PM
7

HOORAY! The feminists censor yet another voice that doesn't march in lockstep to their message!
/r/MensRights12/06/14 12:57 PM
23

Holy shit! "Your guess is as good as mine"?? And that's going to be the law?
/r/MensRights12/06/14 12:56 PM
4

You need to read the article.
/r/MensRights14/03/14 02:47 PM
55

It is far-fetched to believe the father didn't have a strong suspicion what was going on.
/r/MensRights14/03/14 02:45 PM
8

The main issue is that it's bullshit to think this father thought the boy was an intruder.
/r/MensRights14/03/14 02:37 PM
195

I call "bullshit" on the idea that the father believed his daughter didn't know him. The father was pissed that she's having sex with a boy.
/r/MensRights14/03/14 02:35 PM
2

http://www.cotwa.info/2012/06/bygones-be-bygones-unspeakable.html
/r/MensRights17/12/13 08:13 PM
1

http://www.cotwa.info/2012/06/bygones-be-bygones-unspeakable.html
/r/MensRights17/12/13 08:13 PM
2

http://www.cotwa.info/2012/06/bygones-be-bygones-unspeakable.html
/r/MensRights17/12/13 08:13 PM
2

http://www.cotwa.info/2012/06/bygones-be-bygones-unspeakable.html
/r/MensRights17/12/13 08:12 PM
3

http://www.cotwa.info/2012/06/bygones-be-bygones-unspeakable.html
/r/MensRights17/12/13 08:12 PM
7

Yeah, those comments are sexist.
/r/MensRights17/09/13 01:35 PM
1

Okay. Let's see how that goes over.
/r/MensRights17/09/13 01:33 PM
28

Wasn't Miley's performance the kind of thing we're supposed to applaud, per the slutwalks and everything?
/r/MensRights28/08/13 03:19 PM
1

He writes like an idiot.
/r/MensRights27/08/13 11:42 AM
3

They are exposed for what they really are: angry, warped people out-of-touch with reality.
/r/MensRights14/08/13 01:48 PM
2

And yet THIS is supposedly a hate site. Unbelievable!
/r/MensRights14/08/13 01:47 PM
5

Yeah, you raise an excellent point. These fools say this shit and don't even care that they look like idiots. Maybe that sort of thing was accepted in their little circle jerks in the pre-Internet days, but now there are a ton of MEN who are actually onto them -- and who call them on their idiocy.
/r/MensRights14/08/13 01:26 PM
14

Boys protesting that they can't wear shorts?! Boys protesting that they can't wear tank tops?! Why, of course, that's ridiculous! Now when GIRLS protested for the same kinds of things, of course they had a good point . . . . You understand this, don't you? I mean . . . don't you . . .?
/r/MensRights14/08/13 01:20 PM
42

What a fucking moron. Discrimination against men is really discrimination against women. Wow! Get it through your thick feminist skull, dummy: society -- especially WOMYN -- require men to behave a certain way, and men and boys are penalized by society -- especially WOMYN -- when they don't. When MEN are discriminated against, it's discrimination against MEN, not women. Even a five year old can understand that, little wonder a feminist can't.
/r/MensRights14/08/13 01:17 PM
1

ANd that's fair to young men . . . how?
/r/MensRights07/08/13 02:35 AM
0

You're a bullshit poster. Don't fall for you.
/r/MensRights07/08/13 02:35 AM
0

My guess is that you never voted a Republican in your life.
/r/MensRights07/08/13 02:34 AM
0

Obamacare isn't in effect yet, so you must be dead.
/r/MensRights07/08/13 02:33 AM
1

My guess is you never voted for a Republican in your life, right?
/r/MensRights07/08/13 02:33 AM
-3

Your criticism is strange. There was nothing -- NOTHING -- misleading here. You sound like a troll.
/r/MensRights31/07/13 06:03 PM
1

Is this a serious question? You should actually be asking if any legitimate study has ever found discrimination to be at the heart of the gender pay gap. Even the über-left doesn't totally buy into the feminist bullshit. Take former Clinton Labor Secretary and ex-Obama advisor Robert Reich, for example. Mr. Reich has superlative credentials in the liberal community. What does an ultra-liberal who was actually secretary of labor and who actually knows what he's talking about think is the cause of…
/r/MensRights31/07/13 03:08 PM
18

It's a another "pathology" invented by sociologists with feminist leanings as a way to demonize males. Except now they're finding out that the real villain may not have a dick, so my guess is we'll hear very little more about it.
/r/MensRights31/07/13 02:54 PM
1

He's a self-satisfied idiot who is so extreme it's laughable. In other words, a typical blogosphere feminist.
/r/MensRights31/07/13 02:48 PM
-44

So? They're just balls, and he's just a man. Balls are funny - Fat David Futrelle can show you a ton of stories where men laugh at ball pain, which proves that you're just being oversensitive and that there's nothing to see here so you should just move along. And the fact that it would be different if this were a woman is because assaults on women are more serious than assaults on men that kill them. Get it?
/r/MensRights31/07/13 02:44 PM
55

"Though it's highly unusual, sometimes boys can be just as cool as girls." And just as entitled, too.
/r/MensRights22/07/13 11:32 PM
1

OOOOHHH! Let's trash on STRAIGHT MEN! [schoolgirl squeals]
/r/MensRights13/07/13 08:53 PM
2

Yes, the "general consensus" among people who harbor a sick and twisted hatred against straight men and don't care about the truth. Seems right to me.
/r/MensRights13/07/13 08:52 PM
1

This asshole has admitted to me he's David Futrelle. He uses terms like "Special snowflake" and "weapons of mass destruction" that are unique to DAvid.
/r/MensRights11/07/13 03:24 PM
1

Don't be a fucking asshole. You are a feminist troll.
/r/MensRights11/07/13 03:06 PM
2

Some women DO lie about rape, Futrelle.
/r/MensRights11/07/13 03:05 PM
0

David, you ass. The originals were angry, in-your-face jabs at what their very enlightened creators perceived to be as privileged, misogynistic white maleness. You fucking well know that, and you fucking buy into it, too. These are the very assumptions that underlie Man Boobz. The parody posters, on the other hand, were intended to say there's another issue, too. Go troll at some atheist or feminist site where your extremist views are worshiped.
/r/MensRights11/07/13 03:05 PM
1

This is one of David Futrelle's fake REddit names.
/r/MensRights11/07/13 03:01 PM
0

Don't be an asshole. You know damn well that no publication would do this story with the genders reversed. Or are you fucking brain dead? Oh, my mistake: you ARE fucking brain dead. A white knight, fucking brain dead troll.
/r/MensRights11/07/13 11:03 AM
5

Why do people start off with "so"? You are a rapist. And likely a troll looking for some women-haters to say what you did was okay.
/r/MensRights11/07/13 03:23 AM
26

And some do lie. The indignation among the paid sexual assault groupies is laughable. Remember, the people they interview are financially interested in insisting that rape is rampant -- that it is rampant is evidencedby all the women who don't report it. Tons of PSAs tell men not to be "that" guy; just one tells women not to cry "rape" carelessly and you'd think the poster advocated killing women. Rape won't be taken seriously until they stop lying about something so obvious. They are a joke.
/r/MensRights10/07/13 03:35 AM
1

Progressive twit.
/r/MensRights05/07/13 07:08 PM
2

Well, you know, serial killers get marriage requests all the time.
/r/MensRights02/07/13 12:42 PM
1

Bravo. I am actually agreeing with you. If someone "asks" to be raped, that sounds fairly consensual, so it can't be rape. And rape is the only crime where the victims are told to be wary of being victimized. Imagine a PSA where young men were warned about walking through "high crime neighborhoods" (code word for "black"). Wouldn't happen.
/r/MensRights02/07/13 12:42 PM
2

Very few women get off on killers. But there are enough that do to make me wonder what the hell is going on?
/r/MensRights02/07/13 02:41 AM
1

Thanks for that, David Futrelle!
/r/MensRights02/07/13 02:40 AM
1

DAVID FUTRELLE.
/r/MensRights27/06/13 05:26 PM
3

David Futrelle.
/r/MensRights27/06/13 05:23 PM
2

You are a special snowflake, David! Don't have a job yet, I see.
/r/MensRights27/06/13 05:19 PM
2

Here, the people who made the posters were friends/supporters of the accused boys, not the general public or a publicly funded sexual assault advocate (who routinely calls for the accuser to be believed). To suggest they shouldn't ask for the boys to be supported is just silly.
/r/MensRights27/06/13 03:16 PM
30

It's a problem that impacts men.
/r/MensRights27/06/13 03:08 PM
18

I've never been in a head-on collision but I always wear my seat belt. The harm in the event of a false claim is so great that you can't ignore the risk.
/r/MensRights27/06/13 03:07 PM
19

The irony is palpable. Men's collegiate sports teams are constantly being cut because the school has too many male and not enough female athletes. But it's okay for Title IX coordinators to be 83 percent female.
/r/MensRights27/06/13 03:00 PM
7

Biased medical professional. Opinion discounted.
/r/MensRights27/06/13 01:10 PM
1

Great way to discuss the issues. I am going to try to have you banned.
/r/MensRights07/06/13 11:46 AM
6

I think you misunderstand. This is NOT from a general Google search. It is under Google News, which does not include all searches. https://news.google.com/ It does NOT provide a level playing field for MRAs. Here is Google's criteria for inclusion: http://support.google.com/news/publisher/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=40787
/r/MensRights05/06/13 12:08 PM
-6

We should not be inventing male "crises" to match the hysterical rhetoric of radical feminism.
/r/MensRights05/06/13 12:03 PM
8

They don't care about gender equality. They want to advance women over men.
/r/MensRights03/06/13 12:09 AM
2

The customer "forces" the prostitute to sell herself? What an idiot you sound like.
/r/MensRights03/06/13 12:08 AM
3

I think he is David Futrelle.
/r/MensRights02/06/13 05:47 PM
0

Can we stop with the atheism on this subreddit, please?
/r/MensRights31/05/13 01:13 PM
6

"Contemporary life demands an increasingly elastic and collaborative mind, and the unfortunate truth is that American women, generally speaking, are finding it easier to adapt to a country of diverse people and ideas." UGH!
/r/MensRights23/05/13 01:53 PM
10

They are poor excuses for liberals, too. Most are pro-death penalty "under certain circumstances"; their leader thinks it's okay to criticize his predecessor over the Patriot Act but then cranks it up a notch when he gets elected with drone killings and assassination carried out by sneaking into a country and killing a man without a trial; they think anyone opposing gay marriage is a hater even though their own leader opposed it a year ago; they roll back due process on college campuses when it …
/r/MensRights23/05/13 01:41 PM
0

See "I Blame the Patriarchy" for an example.
/r/MensRights16/05/13 09:33 PM
100

WOMEN'S STUDIES departments are sexual harassment.
/r/MensRights16/05/13 09:18 PM
1

Except the definition has been altered by practice and it doesn't mean that any more.
/r/MensRights13/05/13 02:57 PM
3

Well, the point is that people aren't identifying as "feminists" because there is so much bad associated with the word.
/r/MensRights07/05/13 08:09 PM
13

A male feminist. Wow. 82 percent of men are not feminists, according to a new poll: http://www.washingtontimes.com/blog/watercooler/2013/may/1/liberated-72-percent-americans-say-theyre-not-femi/ The remainder are David Futrelle.
/r/MensRights07/05/13 12:18 PM
3

Never occurred to me. Next.
/r/MensRights01/05/13 02:09 PM
78

My favorite part of the story is when her defenders cried "victim blaming." They can't help but resort to their favorite mantras when they are in trouble -- almost like magic words that cast a spell on someone.
/r/MensRights01/05/13 02:07 PM
-15

I think a lot of these are because they are atheists. No excuse, but when you think that truth is relative, lying comes easy.
/r/MensRights01/05/13 02:04 PM
1

Why not?
/r/MensRights30/04/13 08:05 PM
2

Not just a nod of the head? An actual "Woof!"?
/r/MensRights25/04/13 06:40 PM
1

HA HA!
/r/MensRights25/04/13 06:39 PM
5

Looky, looky -- we got an honest-to-goodness rape apologist here!
/r/MensRights25/04/13 06:38 PM
2

FEMINIST PIG!!!!!
/r/MensRights25/04/13 05:22 PM
1

I rolled my eyes, too, but it was an idea too good to pass up.
/r/MensRights25/04/13 05:22 PM
1

When women have sex with boys they typically get shorter sentences than these two women got for having sex with dogs. Your "logic" -- for example, pointing out that the woman was charged with a 20-year-old crime -- is an exercise in picking out some arbitrary thing just to minimize the emotional impact of my post. The fact that you are interested in doing that bespeaks another agenda? Hmm? Nice try.
/r/MensRights25/04/13 04:46 PM
3

Look, there is nothing "scientific" about comparing any two sentences; rarely can two different cases be considered "apples to apples." We would need to do a comparison of all such cases to prove a trend, and finding a trend may not even be possible. But 90 days and 1 year concurrent are a hell of a lot more than a hell of a lot of women get for having repeated, long-term sexual "relations" with one particular, vulnerable class of our citizens, boys. I put this post up there not to "prove" that …
/r/MensRights25/04/13 04:12 PM
10

If women keep this up, maybe there needs to be a new blog, "A Voice for Dogs."
/r/MensRights25/04/13 01:32 PM
1

How about the word "woman" -- isn't that sexist since it ends with "man"?
/r/MensRights25/04/13 01:23 PM
8

Must it be an "enthusiastic Woof!"?
/r/MensRights25/04/13 12:50 PM
6

Good point!
/r/MensRights25/04/13 12:25 PM
8

The hierarchy of beings deserving of protection against sexual abuse: -Woman/Girls -Dogs -Boys -Men
/r/MensRights25/04/13 12:20 PM
11

We need to have a national dialogue about why women have such disrespect for men.
/r/MensRights17/04/13 06:50 PM
2

Type in "Carlos Arrendondo" in Google and you get about 685,000 results, a huge chunk of that is from the Marathon. The picture of Carlos is considered by some news outlets to be too graphic to show.
/r/MensRights17/04/13 05:53 PM
-5

This is America, and you are entitled to be an ass. Which you are.
/r/MensRights10/04/13 02:59 AM
1

You are blessed.
/r/MensRights10/04/13 02:58 AM
1

Have you ever seen him?
/r/MensRights10/04/13 02:08 AM
1

Again, you mean like David Futrelle finds the most bizarre comments and passes them for MRAs?
/r/MensRights09/04/13 11:22 PM
49

I am sick of these self-righteous idiots insisting that "this doesn't represent feminism," yet note that rationale doesn't work for the MRA. David Futrelle paints the entire movement to look like the stupidest comments of self-proclaimed MRAs. And the Southern Poverty shithouse puts the False Rape Society on its hit list because it dared to do a post poking mild fun at Michelle Bachmann supporters who insisted "it takes a woman" to clean up the mess in Washington. They are all full of shit -- se…
/r/MensRights07/04/13 04:06 PM
1

Again, you mean like David Futrelle finds the most bizarre comments and passes them for MRAs? Yeah. Right.
/r/MensRights07/04/13 03:37 PM
1

Yeah. Except feminism is so diverse, it means nothing.
/r/MensRights07/04/13 01:55 PM
3

The day that women are required to register for selective service is the day I will worry about the wage gap.
/r/MensRights07/04/13 01:54 PM
21

You mean like David Futrelle finds the most bizarre comments and passes them for MRAs? Yeah. Right.
/r/MensRights31/03/13 03:05 PM
1

Yeah, because abortion is such a nothing procedure. Right.
/r/MensRights31/03/13 03:04 PM
8

Perhaps only they are permitted to use such language, given the historical oppression and . . . I'm laughing too hard to finish the sentence. You've hit on something. The angriest, foulest-mouthed people I know of are blog feminists.
/r/MensRights31/03/13 03:02 PM
3

Anti-feminism is "hate speech"? For most people it's call "rational thinking."
/r/MensRights30/03/13 06:19 PM
27

Yeah. Equal opportunity, not equal outcomes.
/r/MensRights30/03/13 06:13 PM
0

That's the new standard - if you're not an "outstanding citizen," you are charged with sexual contact. Great.
/r/MensRights30/03/13 06:12 PM
1

YES!!!
/r/MensRights22/03/13 04:46 PM
1

Yes.
/r/MensRights22/03/13 04:45 PM
0

I doubt that what you are saying is true.
/r/MensRights21/03/13 04:08 PM
2

The victim was shielded in anonymity -- they weren't allowed to talk about her specifically.
/r/MensRights19/03/13 04:32 PM
0

Really? "Absurd lengths"? Is there any evidence for this?
/r/MensRights19/03/13 04:31 PM
-2

"Defending them"? You are insane. CNN did not "defend them."
/r/MensRights19/03/13 04:15 PM
1

". . . . your instinct upon seeing a wasted girl or boy should be to help get them out of a dangerous situation . . . ." Ehhhhh, I've been saying the same thing. If I tell someone to make sure they lock their doors, I guess I'm victim blaming.
/r/MensRights15/03/13 09:17 PM
42

Now wait, that's not fair. Women are just as capable as men about everything, in fact more capable - except when it comes to their own safety, then they need a knight in shining armor to rescue them. And the knight in shining armor is not deserving of thanks or praise. He owes it to her to rescue her; it's his duty because he's guilty from birth by reason of penis. Got it?
/r/MensRights14/03/13 12:12 PM
28

They do it to put us in our place.
/r/MensRights14/03/13 12:09 PM
2

Incredible number of downvotes for this. I wonder why.
/r/MensRights13/03/13 02:34 PM
1

That's a good point.
/r/MensRights04/03/13 10:24 PM
0

I think you got her wet with excitement.
/r/MensRights04/03/13 10:23 PM
4

Rape is a one-way street in this rape culture.
/r/MensRights04/03/13 10:08 PM
13

The evidence doesn't matter. He's a rapist forever because some woman accused him.
/r/MensRights04/03/13 10:07 PM
1

You are a crazy person!
/r/MensRights04/03/13 10:06 PM
3

Whew! I smell troll being baked! Nice.
/r/MensRights04/03/13 10:05 PM
-1

No. He joked about the well-paid actresses who purposefully showed their breasts.
/r/MensRights01/03/13 04:03 PM
8

Re: the "we saw your boobs" number: actresses were paid huge money to purposefully flaunt their breasts in films seen by hundreds of thousands of people, including children -- but when an irreverent comic dares to point out that "we saw what you intended us to see" -- that makes him, and all men, misogynists. These people look for excuses to feign oppression.
/r/MensRights25/02/13 08:12 PM
2

You are a brilliant person.
/r/MensRights20/02/13 05:10 PM
2

Yes, I agree. They screech at you. They "reason" with their emotions. When they tell us that we shouldn't take it personal when they talk about the evil patriarchy, just read this student's manifesto: we are all guilty by reason of penis. A word to the trolls: that doesn't mean we support rape. That doesn't mean we enable rapists. That doesn't mean that we won't react if we see a woman being taken advantage of. It just means that we didn't choose to be born with penises (although I am quite happ…
/r/MensRights20/02/13 05:09 PM
1

VICTIM BLAMING!!!!!
/r/MensRights11/02/13 04:15 PM
10

Because of their size, etc., women are more likely to be injured than men, so it's really not so lop-sided. And the ref in the article thinks that the problem is not the size difference, but rather refs who wrongly see women as incapable of violence.
/r/MensRights22/01/13 09:21 PM
3

If you don't understand how instituting a policy of having rape patrols would make a reasonable male midshipmen feel that he's being viewed as a potential rapist -- after the Admiral chided them about sexual assault -- then there's really no sense trying to discuss anything with you. You obviously wouldn't buy it even if the Admiral sent each man a letter that said "Dear Potential Rapist." My guess is that you are part of the "rape is normalized" crowd.
/r/MensRights20/01/13 07:01 PM
1

Hey, that's what DAVID FUTRELLE always says. You're probably him, aren't you?
/r/MensRights02/11/12 05:05 PM
1

You must be a young person who's never held a job.
/r/MensRights27/10/12 09:10 PM
0

Obama is an extreme feminist. Go join him. Go expel your fellow men from college. Idiot.
/r/MensRights27/10/12 09:09 PM
0

Much worse than a feminist? You're an idiot. Go join your manhating friends and vote for the radical feminist, idiot.
/r/MensRights27/10/12 09:08 PM
-2

Wow. That's really out there.
/r/MensRights26/10/12 07:26 PM
-4

No offense, but do you have a full-time job?
/r/MensRights26/10/12 07:26 PM
-9

Spoken like someone who really doesn't follow the issues. Obama is a feminist; Romney is not. To suggest Romney is just as bad as Obama is stupid.
/r/MensRights26/10/12 05:34 PM
7

Go ahead, say that "Women are boring and dumb." Then assert something men have to do that women don't and you'll be branded a whiny privileged male.
/r/MensRights10/10/12 01:41 PM
19

But, you see, the mere fact that you even say that just exposes you as another whiny, privileged male. Can't take a "joke," can you? So what if a woman calls all men "dumb"? That's nothing compared to the historical mistreatment of women.
/r/MensRights10/10/12 01:39 PM
3

"Stay classy," Futrelle.
/r/MensRights09/10/12 09:28 PM
6

Absolutely. In this case it was.
/r/MensRights01/10/12 03:16 AM
5

Here in the US, with whopping unemployment, one of our political parties staged a convention at which the big issue was -- I kid you not -- birth control. In poll after poll, that's not even on most people's radars in terms of the most pressing issues before us. Our presidential administration won't say there is a war on terrorism, but his party continually insists there is a war on women. Why, you ask? Because they are pandering for votes, of course.
/r/MensRights13/09/12 04:51 PM
138

This raises a critical point that underlies much of the frustration of the so-called men's rights movement. It is entirely PC to bash men. That is, unwarranted criticism that would never be tolerated if it was directed at women, outlandish misrepresentations, and negative broad brush stereotyping are all deemed by our cultural elites to be at least quasi-acceptable, and often even politically correct, when they are hurled at what is deemed to be the dominant cultural group. It is for this same r…
/r/MensRights13/09/12 04:29 PM
10

“I think women probably always knew deep down that they were the more intelligent ones – but as the gentler sex we were quiet about it and let men continue to believe they ruled the world.” This raises a critical point that underlies much of the frustration of the so-called men's rights movement. Unwarranted criticism, outlandish misrepresentations, and negative broad brush stereotyping are all deemed by our cultural elites to be at least quasi-acceptable, and often even politically correct, whe…
/r/MensRights10/09/12 03:34 PM
4

If she were a he, it would be a huge news story.
/r/MensRights02/09/12 01:42 AM
4

His body, his sperm. Unless they want fetuses to be marital assets,too.
/r/MensRights26/08/12 08:23 PM
7

Another smug feminist who thinks anyone concerned about things that happen to men is a rape apologist. Don't we just love these broad sweeps that demonize in order to silence? He's an asshole.
/r/MensRights17/08/12 08:56 PM
1

Oh, yeah. I think it's better to kill people you know than. Everyone knows that.
/r/MensRights09/08/12 03:02 PM
9

They are looking for the gunwoman.
/r/MensRights06/08/12 04:40 PM
10

Right, they are different. One is "senseless" violence, the other is . . . "senseless" violence.
/r/MensRights06/08/12 04:40 PM
-1

No women bashing; no claims that men are better than women. Gee, it must be hate speech.
/r/MensRights06/08/12 02:09 PM
10

"Men created the word and other words like it—whore, harlot, ho, skank, hussy, slag, jezebel—as a tool to keep women in their place (below men) and to justify treating them poorly. Labeling some women sluts creates a whole category of women who don’t deserve respect." I am glad this writer provides authorities for this position. I am quite certain no woman has ever been instrumental in these efforts to control other women. So, have you got it? Men hate women and want to lord over them. Got it.
/r/MensRights03/08/12 05:02 PM
5

For boys who suffer the same underlying problems as girls, Claire Perry says, "Fuck them! They have balls, so they're not my concern!" What a jackass.
/r/MensRights27/07/12 04:56 PM
0

I have less faith that role models matter. A lot of us were hoping Barack Obama's ascendency to the the presidency would make the president the ultimate role model for black youths. I have seen no evidence that anything has changed, except that the number of people on food stamps has skyrockted. I don't think role models matter at all, it matters how you are brought up by your father and mother.
/r/MensRights26/07/12 04:51 PM
1

Good for you! My guess is you are receiving some sort of relief from the government, right, mate?
/r/MensRights23/07/12 05:51 PM
1

Right, it's difficult to explain how badly you have it to another group when you can't articulate it, beyond espousing generalities.
/r/MensRights23/07/12 05:49 PM
2

And honestly, your quotations explaining their "rationale" are worse than meaningless. "Down with capitalism" turns feminism into nothing more than the Occupy nutballs. It means nothing. That sort of scattershot passion might play well to the impressionable early 20-somethings looking for "hope and change" (oh, wait - we found out that really doesn't mean anything, didn't we?), but in the real world its meaningless bullshit. You have proven my point.
/r/MensRights23/07/12 05:46 PM
7

There are many similar examples.
/r/MensRights23/07/12 05:11 PM
1

I love it!
/r/MensRights18/07/12 06:31 PM
3

Great column.
/r/MensRights18/07/12 06:25 PM
2

I agree.
/r/MensRights18/07/12 06:23 PM
2

What men did you speak with to get all this information? Men in an asylum for the criminally insane?
/r/MensRights09/06/12 05:01 PM
1

Right.
/r/MensRights22/05/12 08:49 PM
3

Unless I'm checking wrong, Man Boobz has more restrictions via O2 than does AVfM.
/r/MensRights18/05/12 06:00 PM
1

Ah, Roger. You're still around. Still waving proudly to a parade that has long since passed you by. Trust me, Roger will take it as a badge of honor that "men's rights activists" hate him (in a "guns and religion" way, of course). What he surely can't stand is that so many of them are saying, "Roger who?"
/r/MensRights15/05/12 02:48 AM
1

Ever notice how feminists come here to ridicule, and also to the atheist subreddit to wallow in their Godlessness, I guess. It's that group that gives feminists a really ugly name.
/r/MensRights20/04/12 08:48 PM
3

People need to have a thicker skin . . . blah, blah, blah. You are right, of course, but you are missing the point. The problem here isn't that this silly thing is "offensive" to men, the way it was offensive when black men were called "boy." This isn't in the same universe. This is just another manifestation of a DOUBLE STANDARD that folks like you don't even seem to notice. Tell you what, Mr. Chill Out, give your girlfriend a chocolate bone and then brag about how you're "training" your girlfr…
/r/MensRights20/04/12 08:37 PM
6

Actually, I can be motivated by chocolate. And, hey, Milton Hershey was a man. I'll be Cadbury was a guy, too. Look, this isn't "offensive" as much as it's a double standard, and that's why I posted it. It's acceptable for legitimate businesses to talk about training boyfriends; nobody would get away with that for girlfriends. Why is it acceptable? Men are supposed to have broad shoulders because men dominate pretty much everything. And, yes, it's undeniable that men are the gender that moves th…
/r/MensRights20/04/12 01:30 PM
9

I don't think this is "feminist." It's how society talks about men. And, see, we're supposed to just take it because men dominate everything (what they don't mention is that men also dominate almost everything BAD, including homelessness, suicides, diseases, and pretty much everything else), so it's OK to make dog analogies to men.
/r/MensRights20/04/12 12:17 PM
10

No. But there is a disturbing trend among progressives to equate fairness with equal outcomes. This is most glaring in their insistence that the wage gap is largely grounded in "unfairness" as opposed to choices women make. And I apprecaite that those choices are dictated to a large extent by prevailing gender roles that society assigns, but that doesn't nullify someone's free will.
/r/MensRights17/04/12 02:49 PM
1

They don't even realize how idiotic they sound.
/r/MensRights22/03/12 05:17 PM
1

Ability to pay is only a valid excuse if the family is intact. If the father has been ousted from the family by the mother, it becomes pertinent.
/r/MensRights10/03/12 08:15 PM
2

Ability to pay is only a valid excuse if the family is intact. If the father has been ousted from the family by the mother, it becomes pertinent.
/r/MensRights10/03/12 08:14 PM
-3

Your kittens don't logically follow, from anything.
/r/MensRights10/03/12 08:11 PM
-3

Oh, so men as a class care about men more than women? If you think that, you are even less astute than David Futrelle, if that's possible.
/r/MensRights10/03/12 08:07 PM
-6

You know what's really funny? A purportedly serious blogger with a fetish for kitten pictures.
/r/MensRights10/03/12 12:29 AM
6

Sick.
/r/MensRights06/03/12 07:28 PM
5

Funny, the survey only works one way: men doing for women. Chivalry does not comport with modern notions of equality.
/r/MensRights24/02/12 04:47 PM
4

GOOD LUCK, TOMMY!!!
/r/MensRights23/02/12 10:02 PM
3

I'm a Ron Paul guy myself. The more I see him, the more I like him.
/r/MensRights23/02/12 10:01 PM
1

I agree her article was OK so long as we could substitute daughters of a democratic presidential candidate. Do you think this author would ever do that?
/r/MensRights23/02/12 10:01 PM
3

It "sickened" you? Maybe you are overly sensitive, or you must not like "Pierce." I am sure he's rubbed some people the wrong way because he's prickly. He has taken offense at stuff I've written to him when I didn't mean any offense. As over-the-top as this article was, as is usual for him, it was way better written than virtually any of the stuff we see from men's righters. My guess is he wrote it to stick to that woman because he can't stand her, and I think he was showing off a little. You ma…
/r/MensRights23/02/12 09:59 PM
2

Instead of getting an MRA point of view, which will be dismissed, quote one of these sex-positive feminists.
/r/MensRights23/02/12 09:50 PM
5

Wow! She goes on and on to make sure that we know men are not necessarily raped more than women.
/r/MensRights23/02/12 09:49 PM
1

Asssssbaadward.
/r/MensRights09/01/12 10:36 PM
5

Right, except that men can't do it alone, and anytime these points are brought up, some feminist starts saying, "Men need to go out and do it like the women did!" Gee, it seems to me that it was MEN who actually voted to allow women to vote. And MEN who voted to change the rape laws and all the other unfair laws. We're in this together, people.
/r/MensRights05/01/12 09:51 PM
1

Yet, here I am, indeed.
/r/MensRights05/01/12 09:49 PM
1

Men are designing the ads and movies to appeal to an audience, not to mold society in some grant egalitarian endeavor.
/r/MensRights05/01/12 09:24 PM
1

And these nitwits are celebrated.
/r/MensRights05/01/12 09:23 PM
3

Good points. The way feminists did it was to raise awareness about it. Men are doing that in droves -- a good example is this site: http://www.fathersandfamilies.org/ -- they are also seeking legislative reform. Unfortunately, the feminists don't care for that site. Hmm, wonder why?
/r/MensRights05/01/12 09:16 PM
5

You're a clever young man--trying to marginalize my point by confining to the little blog I cited. Very ingenious way of winning your point. But not especially honest. The blog I cited is one of an infinite number of examples. I just happened to come across it at the time, and it illustrates a point that nobody can argue with: women want their men traditional, and men oblige.
/r/MensRights05/01/12 08:56 PM
2

You don't get it. If we're going to have fairness for women, we should have fairness for men, and that's not an issue that only women or only men should care about. Sorry you feel otherwise. The average, typical American woman is not a feminist, and while she's fine with having women "have it all," she is also intent on keeping her man as a traditional man. He can't "have it all." Women have always driven the boat on such issues. The feminists shouldn't be bystanders while men are kept in their …
/r/MensRights05/01/12 08:46 PM
3

"I can't make any assumption of how American women think." Nor can I. But it is clear beyond peradventure that holding men to traditional gender roles is very, very typical. "It's a hugely diverse population . . . ." Last time I checked it was. ". . . and I think that saying that they're all attracted to one thing and one thing only would be foolish." You mean, as foolish as saying that rape is "normalized" among men as so many feminists do? Put that aside, nobody said "they're all attracted to …
/r/MensRights05/01/12 08:21 PM
3

Excuse me, but who brought up "the feminists"? I would think that "the feminists" would agree with my point. The site I linked to doesn't seem to be a "feminist" site by any stretch of the imagination, and please don't try to tell me it's not incredibly typical of how American women think. That's typical of mainstream American women, not Feministing or the other things I suspect you read. Men want to mate. If women suddenly decided they'd only mate with bald men, every hetero guy in America woul…
/r/MensRights05/01/12 07:45 PM
3

Go read "Durham-in-Wonderland" and then come back and we'll talk.
/r/MensRights08/12/11 10:08 PM
5

The author is correct; you obviously don't know what you're talking about.
/r/MensRights08/12/11 08:28 PM
3

Typical of a moonbat radical feminist: they cite one instance as evidence for the way things are.
/r/MensRights08/12/11 11:43 AM
1

Well, pal, we're fucked if we do and fucked if we don't. One of the services provided by this haven is to actually show the misandry. If your order were the rule, this subreddit would be a pretty lonely place.
/r/MensRights25/11/11 10:36 PM
-3

You delivered, all right. You delivered an answer to a question I never asked. What would be the reaction to a man walking two naked women on leashes as if they were dogs?
/r/MensRights18/11/11 08:47 PM
1

I never said women have it easier did I? Why must every discussion here come back to how bad the womyn folk have it with you people? I've seen plenty of complaining over the first ad. I never saw the second ad, the third one is ambiguous.
/r/MensRights18/11/11 07:02 PM
1

I would think even feminists would agree with this. What is to disagree with?
/r/MensRights17/11/11 04:07 PM
-1

You talk like a feminist. Go to the feminist site. Why are you here?
/r/MensRights31/10/11 08:43 PM
-1

Take that crap to the Soviet Union. Oh, sorry. Mr. Reagan put them out of business, didn't he? Because it is a morally bankrupt system, it failed. Why do people like you live in America since you obviously don't care for our way of life?
/r/MensRights31/10/11 08:42 PM
-1

Lol. Yeah. Like welfare and all the crap given for single mothers. You really can't be a men's rights supporter when you tap into the feminist mindset.
/r/MensRights31/10/11 06:46 PM
-3

Good for them. Are you jealous? You sound like you're jealous.
/r/MensRights31/10/11 04:31 PM
-2

So?
/r/MensRights31/10/11 03:43 PM
1

Good work.
/r/MensRights28/10/11 06:30 PM
1

How long do you think a private entity would allow a comment supporting violence against women on their site? And do you really think the 1st Amendment allows unbridled freedom of speech on someone else's site? Really?
/r/MensRights28/10/11 06:29 PM
13

"Comins argues that men who are unjustly accused can sometimes gain from the experience. 'They have a lot of pain, but it is not a pain that I would necessarily have spared them. I think it ideally initiates a process of self-exploration. 'How do I see women?' 'If I didn't violate her, could I have?' 'Do I have the potential to do to her what they say I did?' Those are good questions.'" I hope that the men's movement is better than feminism and doesn't stoop to that.
/r/MensRights19/10/11 02:23 PM
-4

Transgendered? Gay? Why stop there? How about a proportionate number of Jews and Catholics. And if we have progressive nutballs, you'd fit the bill.
/r/MensRights14/10/11 07:41 PM
1

Oh, quotas are "fair." Really now. Anyway, you seem to have missed the point, because my guess is you didn't read it. Having 50% women won't do anything to change sexual assault.
/r/MensRights14/10/11 05:15 PM
13

A Rick Perry supporter, I am sure.
/r/MensRights19/09/11 04:34 PM
1

That's all I can find, too.
/r/MensRights24/08/11 08:15 PM
3

He doesn't fit the ACLU's class narrative.
/r/MensRights24/08/11 08:15 PM
15

But, but, but . . . you don't understand. Since historically women are oppressed and abused, present day men who weren't part of any "historically," are fair game. Don't you know that?
/r/MensRights23/08/11 01:56 PM
11

You are the queen of the nitwits, is what you are.
/r/MensRights22/08/11 01:53 AM
3

You are a misogynist for even bringing this up! You see, Crystal is entitled to support ONLY when the truth about her is concealed.
/r/MensRights22/08/11 01:51 AM
4

P.S. the title of my post is poorly worded. No one wishes the woman was also physically abused.
/r/MensRights22/08/11 01:49 AM
0

Welcome to our thread, feminist.
/r/MensRights16/08/11 10:34 AM
1

Right. Just another example of how men don't take rape seriously.
/r/MensRights16/08/11 10:33 AM
2

My guess is you were one of the feminists who were very upset when the N.C. attorney general revealed that the Duke lacrosse boys were "innocent." And, yeah, there were a fair number of you who were very upset about that outcome. Some of you literally would have preferred a woman to have been brutally raped than to have those three young men walk away free. How sick is that?
/r/MensRights15/08/11 11:51 AM
0

My guess is you were one of the feminists who were very upset when the N.C. attorney general revealed that the Duke lacrosse boys were "innocent." And, yeah, there were a fair number of you who were very upset about that outcome. Some of you literally would have preferred a woman to have been brutally raped than to have those three young men walk away free. How sick is that?
/r/MensRights15/08/11 11:49 AM
0

And see this: http://falserapesociety.blogspot.com/2011/08/salon-doublex-gabfest-hits-nail-on-head.html
/r/MensRights05/08/11 06:47 PM
3

Yeah, because feminists are vindictive shrews!
/r/MensRights05/08/11 05:41 PM
5

You mean like how the feminists claim that every rape claim that wasn't definitively declared a false claim gets counted as a rape? Like that? So if ten percent of all claims are definitively false, and another ten are definitively rapes, well it must be that 90 percent of all rape claims were actual rapes. You mean like that, right? You are such a fucking loser. Go back to I Blame the Patriarchy or MANBOOBZ.
/r/MensRights05/08/11 05:33 PM
9

It should be banned here, too.
/r/MensRights05/08/11 03:16 PM
2

HA HA! This comment also assumes the accused is an "abuser."
/r/MensRights05/08/11 12:27 AM
7

Then why say it? She said it to give her an excuse to malign "white males" as a group.
/r/MensRights24/07/11 01:46 PM
2

That's because David Futrelle is a far left loon.
/r/MensRights28/06/11 07:38 PM
1

I want to buy a boat. I should be subsidized for that.
/r/MensRights24/06/11 04:44 PM
1

She didn't use the word "rape," that is true. I take it that you would not characterize what she describes as rape?
/r/MensRights24/06/11 04:42 PM
2

How about I ask the Slut Walks to stop because it's gender divisive and stupid. Should I expect some amount of reasonable compromise? But I'm sure that's different in your world.
/r/MensRights14/06/11 01:19 PM
2

And "uncomfortable" is defined by her subjective feelings, right, jeffO? Yeah, THAT'S really a workable standard.
/r/MensRights14/06/11 01:18 PM
-1

Let me guess: you're one of these women that guys DON'T check out, so you come on this board with a stick up your ass acting like an idiot. Right?
/r/MensRights14/06/11 01:16 PM
2

All due respect, but your girlfriend is a loon. Men are sexually attracted to women. Get over it. If a man said it's "ridiculous that we live in a society where women think it's okay to walk around showing most of their breasts," he'd be castigated, and maybe castrated. Yet men aren't allowed to look? What is that, "eye rape"? It's like attending a bachelor party with a stripper is disgusting and depraved; attending a bachelorette party with a stripper and a raunchy cake depicting an ejaculating…
/r/MensRights14/06/11 01:14 PM
2

The women most concerned about the "problem" of women getting too much male attention are the women who don't get any.
/r/MensRights06/06/11 09:46 PM
1

Try reading the post before commenting. Or better yet, go back to Womyn's Studies class and leave the discourse to the adults.
/r/MensRights01/06/11 01:51 PM
6

That's a clever saying. Did you make that up just for this thread?
/r/MensRights26/05/11 06:30 PM
15

And why people living on the street are overwhelmingly male.
/r/MensRights26/05/11 01:40 PM
10

Yeah, some patriarchy! Ya know, for a system that's supposed to benefit males, this one really sucks.
/r/MensRights26/05/11 01:11 PM
7

I favor this ban as a matter of principle -- just because if the genders were somehow reversed, WOMEN wouldn't allow it.
/r/MensRights21/05/11 04:54 PM
2

besebabane recently revealed on another thread that her interest is rape: "1/6 [is probably not accurate either. I am the youngest of 6 siblings. 5 girls. Every one of us has been a victim of rape. I suspect our brother was too but he has never said a word to anyone." http://www.reddit.com/r/reddit.com/comments/hfrni/do_guys_around_here_understand_how_much_of_a_turn/c1v30p5 Little wonder she'd find the statement objectionable.
/r/MensRights20/05/11 02:21 PM
3

NOW proves it again.
/r/MensRights19/05/11 08:30 PM
2

You are exactly right.
/r/MensRights16/05/11 07:25 PM
-3

Agreed about men's rights. Many of them do exactly as you said.
/r/MensRights16/05/11 07:24 PM
4

Absolutely not true in the case of FRS.
/r/MensRights16/05/11 07:15 PM
10

FRS does not, to my knowledge, report on rape acquittals as false claims. If you want to know how FRS treats rape claims, read it's take on the Strauss-Kahn claim. OTHER MRAs are already building a case against the accuser. FRS's Archivist wrote this: "I have no idea if a crime was committed, and neither do you." So, you know, maybe YOU need to be a little more discerning and less quick to judge.
/r/MensRights16/05/11 07:14 PM
7

"'Not guilty' does not automatically mean 'falsely accused.'" FRS has never, ever said otherwise.
/r/MensRights16/05/11 07:04 PM
5

No proof? FRS reports stories every day that are false -- based on proof of falsehood. They don't claim, as many others do, that an acquittal is equivalent to falsehood. By the way, the vast majority of unfounded claims for which there is evidence of falsehood are never charged, much less convicted. I suspect you'd have a problem with calling a claim "false" even if the woman recanted and the police said the evidence showed she lied. I have no such problem, given the absence of prosecution of th…
/r/MensRights16/05/11 07:03 PM
19

To Jackson Katz: I was born male. It wasn't a choice I made. By virtue of being born male, I did not become responsible for other people who were also born male. I have no control over other people who were born male, any more than I have control over anyone not born male. I am responsible for me, and that's a sufficiently difficult task. I do not share the guilt of a wrongdoer even if he has a penis, unless I participated in the wrongdoing. Likewise, I can't lay claim to quarterbacking my favor…
/r/MensRights12/05/11 05:02 PM
2

Not a great way to get upvotes, asking "are you guys stupid?" Warfare has changed. There is no necessity for drafting only front line personnel. You've spent a lot of words building on a faulty premise.
/r/MensRights09/05/11 11:05 PM
3

The "company" was the IRS, and the IRS tried to stop him from being fired!
/r/MensRights09/05/11 05:11 PM
3

No, but there are many other ways women can serve aside from taking all the desk jobs.
/r/MensRights09/05/11 05:09 PM
13

The failure to sign up trails you like a ghost for the rest of your life. If you were born with a dick.
/r/MensRights09/05/11 05:08 PM
6

A violation of a law should not be punished if the law wasn't just in the first place. We live in an era where every single law that disadvantages women have been made gender neutral; where women are given advantages to start small businesses, and virtually every collegiate sports team cut has been men's teams, in order to give women equality. So, yes, I agree with you. We should not condone breaking the law, but if the law is unfair -- and this one has been unfair for decades -- then it's not a…
/r/MensRights09/05/11 05:07 PM
0

In a lot of high schools, boys still aren't allowed to wear shorts, while girls are allowed to wear skirts. So the boys can swelter in long pants - and if a boy protests the discrimination, he's accusing of "whining."
/r/MensRights09/05/11 02:10 PM
2

Correct. The only person who charged the SEALS in the bin Laden house was a woman. She's alive. The males who were just standing there in their pajamas were gunned down.
/r/MensRights06/05/11 11:18 AM
2

Here is what this asshole troll wrote elsewhere today about the Yale investigation: "I actually agree with the girls here. It's one thing to allow people free speech. It's entirely another when a university you pay money to sponsors groups that promote hate speech." You always agree with the girls. You are a feminist troll. What other reddit names do you use?
/r/MensRights26/04/11 12:58 AM
1

How many other reddit names do you have? You are the most obvious feminist troll I've seen.
/r/MensRights26/04/11 12:55 AM
1

Um, yeah, I'm sure.
/r/MensRights26/04/11 12:55 AM
1

Spoken like someone who's had two posts to this Reddit. What other names do you go by, troll?
/r/MensRights25/04/11 09:24 PM
3

If the goal is to deter sexual assaults - if that is really the goal - then it's necessary to deter the underage drinking by charging it whenever it occurs. Underage drinking fuels sexual assault. The policy of not charging underage drinking has it exactly backwards. It encourages women to drink without fear of being charged, and that drinking fuels sexual assault on campus. This policy actually will increase the risk the sexual assault on campus. Here's the reality: women are far more likely no…
/r/MensRights25/04/11 03:58 PM
10

Those angry feminists should be forced to read this as their penance for their hatred of an entire gender: http://falserapesociety.blogspot.com/p/lamb-to-slaughter-hofstra-false-rape.html
/r/MensRights20/04/11 03:14 PM
1

Their true colors, I'd say.
/r/MensRights20/04/11 12:21 PM
0

Yeah, learn to spell "FALSE RAPE CLAIMS" and then maybe your list will have some merit.
/r/MensRights03/04/11 02:58 AM
0

Too nice, Pierce. The asshole has just disrespected me and a lot of your other readers who are false rape victims.
/r/MensRights03/04/11 02:57 AM
0

You are a first class nitwit. RAPE is feminism's sacrament in its church of perpetual victimhood. False Rape Claims are an assault on ALL MEN. You deserve no respect in light of this incredibly insensitive remark. You are an idiot.
/r/MensRights03/04/11 02:56 AM
3

You've done more for men than the asshole with the list could ever hope to do.
/r/MensRights03/04/11 02:54 AM
1

Yes, he or she is retarded. He has NO credibility leaving this issue off the table.
/r/MensRights03/04/11 02:54 AM
2

"I am not a part of the men’s rights movement, nor am I a men’s rights activist." http://toysoldier.wordpress.com/2011/03/14/i-know-you-are-but-what-am-i/ For you to say that FRS "never talk about men's issues" but "they just talk about people lying to the police" is astoundingly incorrect. They post multiple posts every week raising awareness about a particularly nasty thing that happens almost exclusively to men.
/r/MensRights03/04/11 02:13 AM
4

Read to the end. I read this site all the time but don't remember the Wiccan post referenced. Unbelievable.
/r/MensRights03/04/11 01:15 AM
1

How on earth can you say that? What, did they delete a comment of yours or something? Besides, the author of Toy Soldiers says his isn't an MRA site.
/r/MensRights03/04/11 01:12 AM
2

No "False Rape Society"? You're kidding, of course.
/r/MensRights03/04/11 12:30 AM
-1

I would be willing to contribute articles to FRS from time to time. May I send you one?
/r/MensRights15/03/11 09:00 PM
1

Dude, you really have to chill. What's the chip on your shoulder for?
/r/MensRights15/03/11 08:59 PM
0

You really are onto something there. There was a gender studies professor in our college who did not shave her underarms. No kidding. Like a cliche out of the '70s.
/r/MensRights15/03/11 08:40 PM
1

Where the fuck is that in the story?
/r/MensRights15/03/11 08:37 PM
6

Nice response. Katic's piece paints him as a pandering moron. And I say that with all due respect.
/r/MensRights15/03/11 12:02 PM
3

No mixed messages here. Report if you've been raped, but only if you've been raped.
/r/MensRights14/03/11 06:16 PM
-4

"Reactive bullshit." You write like a fucking pussy. Grow up and stop writing like a fucking feminyst.
/r/MensRights10/03/11 05:12 PM
-3

Hey, fucking cretin, you write like a fucking feminist. Go get a boyfriend and ask him to make love to you. It'll make you feel better.
/r/MensRights10/03/11 05:10 PM
1

The point is not valid. Read the fucking post -- he explained what needs to be done to combat sexual assault. The fact that the guys did it of their own free will is beside the point. SO WHAT?! DIDJA GET THE POINT AT ALL? These guys were tools of the sexual grievance industry to justify its existence. It's all about money, friend.
/r/MensRights10/03/11 05:08 PM
-3

You know what's offensive? Your comment, which is typical of "reactive offended bullshit" feminism in general. The blogger who wrote this post makes your writing and argumentation look downright childish. He could chew you up alive and spit you out, he's on such a different level. Read the fucking post again, because it actually explained what needs to be done to combat sexual assault. The problem with you and the fucking sisterhood is you can't handle the truth.
/r/MensRights10/03/11 05:05 PM
11

Um, the post was merely pointing out - correctly, too - what a useless waste of time it was (kind of like your comment) to help stop the so-called rape epidemic.
/r/MensRights10/03/11 03:59 PM
2

Pathological liars and congenital idiots.
/r/MensRights09/03/11 07:26 PM
0

On the contrary, I think news organizations are embarassed by false rape claims. They are cheerleaders for rape claims to be actual rapes because actual rapes are a lot scarier and sell more newspapers.
/r/MensRights02/03/11 10:44 PM
0

I know I send them a bunch, and readers post links to a bunch. Their site has become a clearinghouse for rape lie stories.
/r/MensRights02/03/11 10:42 PM
-1

FRS reported on six -- count em, SIX (and one questionable rape trial) false rape claims JUST TODAY. And FRS reports on these stories EVERY DAY of the week, in mind-numbing detail. For a crime that is supposed to be a "myth" (and that's the term sexual assault counselors use all the time about them), I'd damn well say it's a rash. Sometimes the facts just seem "sensationalist."
/r/MensRights02/03/11 10:41 PM
5

No, sir, it was a fucking quote. The fact that she felt compelled to also give jail time is beside the point. The point is the sympathy and "understanding" for someone who did a thing that cause two MALES -- that's rigth, sir, this is a lie that could not get two FEMALES in trouble -- arrested. I know how difficult that is for your sensitive egalitarian ears to hear, but that's what happened.
/r/MensRights01/03/11 07:32 PM
0

Can you read?
/r/MensRights01/03/11 04:50 PM
5

You are misleading and reprehensible.
/r/MensRights01/03/11 04:49 PM
0

Nice to see the downvoters explaining their disagreement.
/r/MensRights23/02/11 07:12 PM
-3

Ah, the old burga argument that disproves beyond any question that sexual attractiveness has nothing to do with rape. Go troll somewhere else.
/r/MensRights18/02/11 04:52 PM
0

I've answered him, but my guess is he's one of these "methodology" feminists. Anything they don't like, they vomit about how the "methodology" was problematic.
/r/MensRights18/02/11 03:51 PM
0

I promise you, sir, you will never get proof of this -- or anything else that doesn't fit your preconceived political agenda -- that will satisfy you. If you don't understand that female sexual attractiveness is widely regarded by the vast majority of men to peak at a certain age group, which just happens to be the age group targeted, then there is nothing else to say.
/r/MensRights18/02/11 03:49 PM
1

The article doesn't say rape is anyone's "fault" other than the rapist's. It is pointing out an inequity about who rape targets. Sorry that isn't to your liking.
/r/MensRights18/02/11 03:32 PM
-3

Sigh. Ditch the political activist lens and grow up.
/r/MensRights18/02/11 03:28 PM
-5

Rapists seek out the most sexually attractive victim. That's reality. That's what the experts know. That's what our parents knew. But somehow we are supposed to pretend that what everyone knows is true isn't, for the sake of appeasing political activists.
/r/MensRights18/02/11 03:13 PM
1

Great stuff here.
/r/MensRights17/02/11 02:06 PM
0

I'm curious: what do the down voters disagree with here? It's actually a women-affirming piece, and female reporters in warzones probably would agree with it.
/r/MensRights17/02/11 02:06 PM
-2

But let me guess: celebrating sexual assault on Valentine's Day isn't, right?
/r/MensRights14/02/11 03:48 PM
-6

But let me guess: celebrating sexual assault on Valentine's Day isn't, right?
/r/MensRights14/02/11 03:47 PM
1

Not sure what you're saying. First, black men haven't missed the point. Her naming a black man was done to play on the stereotype of black men being scary criminals. Second, false rape claims are a GENDERED crime. The point of the post is that nobody ever talks about THAT part of it.
/r/MensRights09/02/11 06:46 PM
0

You missed the point. The point is that the crime of rape is viewed as a gendered crime, an assault on all women. False rape claims are not viewed as a gendered crime.
/r/MensRights09/02/11 06:10 PM
4

Ya know, you really should READ the post before saying idiotic things about it.
/r/MensRights05/02/11 06:05 PM
7

"Repeatedly"? Really??! Have you even READ the last "victim's" statements to police? As the post says, "the evolving narrative of a woman groping for victimhood."
/r/MensRights05/02/11 06:04 PM
0

You make valid points. Welcome to our battlefield.
/r/MensRights03/02/11 10:54 PM
1

Doesn't the TYPICAL GENDER double standard bother you? That was the point of the post.
/r/MensRights03/02/11 10:45 PM
4

I was going to say that a kid's judgment and reasoning skills aren't as mature as an adult's, but then it struck me that col381 is probably an adult, so my argument goes right out the window.
/r/MensRights03/02/11 10:43 PM
-3

You need to read the guy's blog. He's already dealt with this bill in a previous post, and the main aspect of it was "forcible." But a big part of "forcible" is the statutory rape thing. Now, can we perhaps see you advocate on this board without being prompted by a feminist issue?
/r/MensRights03/02/11 10:32 PM
2

It should bother you. IT's the same old "Women=good; men=bad" crap.
/r/MensRights03/02/11 09:48 PM
5

"Don't hit a girl" implies "but hitting a guy is A-OK."
/r/MensRights03/02/11 09:47 PM
0

"I also think that by bitching about one thing in comparison to the other, lessens the importance of both issues." No it doesn't, and you miss the point. This post is raising awareness about a ridiculous gender double standard, that's all. You were very much opposed to the earlier Smith bill language that included the word "forcible," and now you don't want this particular awful double-standard highlighted. All you people who are supposedly interested in gender equity never seem to show up -- un…
/r/MensRights03/02/11 09:45 PM
7

Um, the "request for an apology" is idiotic. The "long rant" simply underscores that. You are obviously one of Pierce's detractors. He probably deleted a comment of yours at some point and you're throwing a hissy fit.
/r/MensRights01/02/11 02:33 AM
1

"I don't really have anything to say about the "two kinds" of voyeurism . . ." Then shut up, know it all.
/r/MensRights23/01/11 03:23 AM
1

I agree.
/r/MensRights23/01/11 03:22 AM
1

Oh, fuck, you can't read, either!
/r/MensRights23/01/11 03:22 AM
2

The post doesn't say, but maybe the laws have changed over the years.
/r/MensRights23/01/11 03:22 AM
1

Right. But there is. So your hypothetical doesn't really resonate in the real world.
/r/MensRights15/12/10 09:56 PM
1

Heeeere we go! One-third, huh? When did you pull that out of your vagina? And "change men" -- as a class? Because "they're all the same." You probably say the same thing about blacks and Jews, you asshole bigot.
/r/MensRights15/12/10 09:55 PM
0

"I'd sign up for the draft if I got paid the same amount of money for doing the same job as a man." No you wouldn't. You'd invent something else to kvetch about. Like PMS.
/r/MensRights15/12/10 09:51 PM
3

What an inane, childish comment. It's not in women's interest to, um, fight for their country? Because someone else is doing it for them? How selfish. With rights come responsibilities.
/r/MensRights15/12/10 09:50 PM
1

You are right. Consensual sex is NOT rape. Consensual sex is only CLAIMED to be rape by too many young women. So, yes, you are right. (And you've never heard that it's "victim blaming" to hold women responsible not to drink too much after they've allegedly been raped? What rock have you been living under?)
/r/MensRights24/11/10 06:55 PM
0

I doubt that you find it "slightly amusing." You're a troll who finds this post offensive, but you're too full of yourself to come out and say it.
/r/MensRights23/11/10 04:44 PM
7

How very 60s of you. You ought to seek treatment for this.
/r/MensRights20/11/10 11:56 PM
4

This shitty nonsense comment from a commentator who recently wrote: "False-accusations didn't suddenly go into decline. False reports for rape charges are on par with false reports filed for other crimes."
/r/MensRights12/11/10 02:18 PM
2

You're kidding, right? That's the blog where the blogger says rape law should be changed to allow women to declare whether they've been raped, even after-the-fact.
/r/MensRights31/08/10 11:49 AM
11

I no longer believe loons like this are so terribly marginalized, given the popularity of "I blame the patriarchy." We can stick our heads in the sand and refuse to acknowledge them, or we can all be aware of this hatred and confront it.
/r/MensRights30/08/10 02:08 PM
22

It's so sick. I know this is about as extreme as it gets, but I think the readers of this subreddit need to be reminded once in a while that these people are out there.
/r/MensRights30/08/10 11:06 AM
2

But primarily for destroying the innocent's life.
/r/MensRights21/07/10 03:16 PM
10

Uninformed. One of the principal purposes of criminal sentencing is to deter criminality. We believe in that principle across the board -- except when feminists stick their fingers in rape laws and want to excuse vile false accusers. Rape victims favor stronger punishments for false accusers precisely because the integrity of rape victims is hurt by rape lies.
/r/MensRights30/06/10 04:58 PM
15

With libel, the liable party has not used the law enforcement apparatus of the government to deprive an innocent person of his liberty. That is why, for example, if you tell someone I raped you, that is not a crime. If you report to the police that I raped you, it is a crime. If you are interested in fixing the inmate population, this is a terrible place to start. Start with drug usage, which primarily harm the user, not other people. Many instances of so-called "date rape" are not violent in an…
/r/MensRights30/06/10 04:45 PM
-2

Then sign it.
/r/MensRights02/06/10 01:08 PM
16

http://falserapesociety.blogspot.com/2009/03/why-so-little-coverage-of-case-of-woman.html
/r/MensRights11/05/10 03:23 PM
3

The "point" is the harm to the women. Of course.
/r/MensRights10/05/10 05:05 PM
0

So, the "point" is the women. Of course.
/r/MensRights10/05/10 05:03 PM
1

I agree, Pierce. It always come back to the "real" victims are the women. Or in this case, "the point" is that women might have been hurt.
/r/MensRights10/05/10 05:03 PM
3

What could the university do if the alleged victims aren't willing to come forward?
/r/MensRights10/05/10 05:02 PM
1

Speaking for me (and I'll bet most men): we rather mate.
/r/MensRights09/04/10 09:15 PM
2

Yeah, just tell a woman confidently that you don't have a good job and watch how fast she asks you to bed.
/r/MensRights09/04/10 04:20 PM
5

Oops! Woman who statutorily raped boy bribes girl to falsely accuse the boy of rape
/r/MensRights07/04/10 04:25 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter