~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Why do women get surprised/offended when men want sex?Because many of the women who get surprised or offended when men want sex aren't actually ordinary women—they are asexual. Yet, they don't view themselves that way. Any other ordinary woman would consider a man's desire for sex to be normal, since she wants it too—even if not with that specific man. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 08/08/26 06:19 AM |
| 1 | hot take: men need to adapt more feminine traits to resolve the gender warYou do realize that men with feminine traits are unattractive to women, right? Every single time—literally every time—a man does something "feminine" (or simply something considered to be so), it causes problems. For instance, if a man is emotionally vulnerable or cries in front of a woman, the relationship is dead. Or, at the very least, it triggers an instant "ick" for women. I’m glad you’re not like that and that it works for you, but you are in the minority. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 07/08/26 06:00 AM |
| 1 | There are plenty of single and childless men who are just as happy as single and childless women, we just don’t see it advertised as muchThere is a difference between: 1) Oh, if I had a home, a car, a stable income, a financial safety net, no health issues, etc., then I’d probably want children. And 2) I don’t want children under any circumstances and actively avoid having them; I’m looking for a partner who is also child-free, etc. Only number 2 is "child-free." | /r/PurplePillDebate | 28/06/26 09:27 PM |
| 1 | There are plenty of single and childless men who are just as happy as single and childless women, we just don’t see it advertised as much"Child-free" refers exclusively to people who do not want children from the beginning and avoid having them; this is a matter of personal principle for them. This category does not include people who would like to have children but do not have them for some reason—since, if that reason were removed, they would have children. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 28/06/26 09:20 PM |
| 1 | There are plenty of single and childless men who are just as happy as single and childless women, we just don’t see it advertised as muchBut these numbers are right at the very least, precisely regarding sexual and romantic deviations. As for the child-free, they have various reasons for not wanting children, and it’s far from always a matter of ideology. There is a difference between those who don't want to have a child for various reasons(1) and those who don't want one due to their values or a fundamental lack of desire (2). I would probably agree if we were talking about the last(2) group, but if you gave the first(1) group… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 28/06/26 08:04 PM |
| 4 | There are plenty of single and childless men who are just as happy as single and childless women, we just don’t see it advertised as muchPoint isn't that happy singles—or happy child-free people, and so on—don't exist; such people are entirely real, and it’s great for them. Point is that these people represent not just a minority, but a overwhelming minority of humanity. Child-free, asexuals, and aromantics each make up only about 1–2% of the population. Remaining 98% of humanity genuinely desires romantic relationships, sex, children, and all the rest. Therefore, it is largely pointless to make sweeping statements like "You can … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 28/06/26 07:19 PM |
| 1 | How do the conversations about women willing to do naughtier things with past partners come up?I've always found this question amusing: "How do you know what they did in the past?!" It reminds me of how often when you catch a small child misbehaving, they ask, "How did you know I did that?!" Darling, it doesn't matter how I found out about it, but what we do with this new information. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 23/06/26 06:50 AM |
| 2 | DISCUSSION🗨️ ABOUT MAIN PPD POSTS📮, LOOKS👀, AND N-COUNT🔢 ARE RESTRICTED🚫 FROM THE DAILY🌞 MEGATHREAD🧵Ahahahaha, damn, he actually said that... But Taliban still have Bacha bazi, so I think they'll find common ground here too. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/06/26 03:54 PM |
| 2 | DISCUSSION🗨️ ABOUT MAIN PPD POSTS📮, LOOKS👀, AND N-COUNT🔢 ARE RESTRICTED🚫 FROM THE DAILY🌞 MEGATHREAD🧵Don't be so cruel to the two of them. Russians literally handed him over a bunch of women and children - all dressed in national costumes, with food. And Tate will probably have something to discuss with the Taliban at that forum. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/06/26 02:54 PM |
| 2 | DISCUSSION🗨️ ABOUT MAIN PPD POSTS📮, LOOKS👀, AND N-COUNT🔢 ARE RESTRICTED🚫 FROM THE DAILY🌞 MEGATHREAD🧵In fact, right now, Blue Pill have the perfect opportunity to strike Tate brothers, and strike in the literal sense. Just donate money to the Ukrainian army and that's it. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/06/26 02:27 PM |
| 1 | If you haven’t dated in the last 10-15 yrs you shouldn’t be giving dating adviceAnd why are they bothering to spend their time on this subreddit, if they are in such happy marriages? Because they're deeply unhappy and deluding themselves. There have been plenty of examples here before where people talked about their fantastic marriages, and then in other posts and subreddits they went into more detail about how their lives are crap. And this mostly applies to women, since there are more married women here. So yes, men here really shouldn't consider these women to be real—it… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/05/26 01:23 PM |
| 8 | The Concept of “Leagues” in Dating Doesn’t Make SenseAnd as in other studies on this topic, the fact that men “overestimate themselves” does not change anything in general It turned out that the perception of one's own appearance and that of others is similar for men, and how they "overestimate their attractiveness" also works the other way, because they see others as more attractive. So even if a hypothetical man 5/10 thinks that he is 7/10, then when he sees a woman 5/10, he will think that she is 7. And a woman 7, he will think that she is 9 an… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 30/01/26 02:23 AM |
| 1 | It's really funny when people bring up the idea of "you don't need sex - you can just jerk off" and then complain about men who only want sex.You are still communicating with them... | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/01/26 07:05 PM |
| 1 | It's really funny when people bring up the idea of "you don't need sex - you can just jerk off" and then complain about men who only want sex.I argue that this does not happen 100% of the time.And that there are cases when emotions are involved | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/01/26 07:04 PM |
| 0 | It's really funny when people bring up the idea of "you don't need sex - you can just jerk off" and then complain about men who only want sex.You can't agree to have sex with someone and not see them as a living soul. You'll still have to interact with them, flirt, and so on. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/01/26 07:04 PM |
| 1 | It's really funny when people bring up the idea of "you don't need sex - you can just jerk off" and then complain about men who only want sex.You can't agree to have sex with someone and not see them as a living soul. You'll still have to interact with them, flirt, and so on. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/01/26 07:03 PM |
| 0 | It's really funny when people bring up the idea of "you don't need sex - you can just jerk off" and then complain about men who only want sex.Okay, I'm glad about that🤝 Have a good day. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/01/26 07:01 PM |
| 1 | It's really funny when people bring up the idea of "you don't need sex - you can just jerk off" and then complain about men who only want sex.So, I'm wrong about thinking that sex is more than just PiiV. Okay, I get it. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/01/26 07:00 PM |
| 2 | It's really funny when people bring up the idea of "you don't need sex - you can just jerk off" and then complain about men who only want sex.Once again, confirmation of my post. Thank you. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/01/26 06:59 PM |
| -2 | It's really funny when people bring up the idea of "you don't need sex - you can just jerk off" and then complain about men who only want sex.Are you seriously going to defend the idea that it's okay to treat people like warm meat now? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/01/26 06:59 PM |
| 1 | It's really funny when people bring up the idea of "you don't need sex - you can just jerk off" and then complain about men who only want sex.Yes?… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/01/26 06:57 PM |
| 1 | It's really funny when people bring up the idea of "you don't need sex - you can just jerk off" and then complain about men who only want sex.If you're having sex with someone, you're expected to show them attention by default. At the very least, it's about consent, flirting, and so on. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/01/26 06:57 PM |
| 1 | It's really funny when people bring up the idea of "you don't need sex - you can just jerk off" and then complain about men who only want sex.I already answered you that in sex there are emotions in any case, if it is with enthusiastic consent. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/01/26 06:56 PM |
| 1 | It's really funny when people bring up the idea of "you don't need sex - you can just jerk off" and then complain about men who only want sex.You can't communicate with people sexually without sexually intimate actions (this is not just PiV) | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/01/26 06:54 PM |
| 3 | It's really funny when people bring up the idea of "you don't need sex - you can just jerk off" and then complain about men who only want sex.You still don't treat these people like corpses. Furthermore, you have an emotional connection with each other (this is expressed in mutual desire and consent), but this connection is temporary (but even this is not always the case, and it is still a common phenomenon for ONS to develop into relationships). | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/01/26 06:54 PM |
| 8 | It's really funny when people bring up the idea of "you don't need sex - you can just jerk off" and then complain about men who only want sex.Thanks for the perfect example of how right my post is. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/01/26 06:51 PM |
| -1 | It's really funny when people bring up the idea of "you don't need sex - you can just jerk off" and then complain about men who only want sex.Now you're moving on to denying that heterosexual people exist. It's getting crazier and crazier. Although, just so you know (though my information comes from post-Soviet prisons), this act of homosexuality was meant for segregation and "domination," not for mutual sexual experience. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/01/26 06:51 PM |
| 1 | It's really funny when people bring up the idea of "you don't need sex - you can just jerk off" and then complain about men who only want sex.You don't have to be married to have a sexual/romantic relationship with someone. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/01/26 06:48 PM |
| 2 | It's really funny when people bring up the idea of "you don't need sex - you can just jerk off" and then complain about men who only want sex.This is actually an interesting view and I can agree with it. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/01/26 06:47 PM |
| 1 | It's really funny when people bring up the idea of "you don't need sex - you can just jerk off" and then complain about men who only want sex.Communication with a living person | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/01/26 06:46 PM |
| 0 | It's really funny when people bring up the idea of "you don't need sex - you can just jerk off" and then complain about men who only want sex.I think this is what you should do for me. Because it's not me who denies well-known facts. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/01/26 06:45 PM |
| -1 | It's really funny when people bring up the idea of "you don't need sex - you can just jerk off" and then complain about men who only want sex.You do realize that you're simply confirming my post by comparing fully transactional sex to emotionally consensual sex based on mutual desire and consent? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/01/26 06:44 PM |
| 1 | It's really funny when people bring up the idea of "you don't need sex - you can just jerk off" and then complain about men who only want sex.>I have been treated like a pulseless corpse before by men during a hookup. So it is a thing that happens. Mutual desire maybe. But not mutual pleasure. Consent yes. Regret also yes. Emotional connection. No. I'm sorry you went through this, but it's not normal. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/01/26 06:42 PM |
| 0 | It's really funny when people bring up the idea of "you don't need sex - you can just jerk off" and then complain about men who only want sex.If you think of another person as a warm fleshlight/dildo, then you can think so. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/01/26 06:40 PM |
| 0 | It's really funny when people bring up the idea of "you don't need sex - you can just jerk off" and then complain about men who only want sex.>I think we’ve found your error. Yes, what you are denying is obviously existing phenomena that were widely known to everyone even before the Internet. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/01/26 06:39 PM |
| 1 | It's really funny when people bring up the idea of "you don't need sex - you can just jerk off" and then complain about men who only want sex.This is a direct contradiction and double standard, because these people don't like men who see sex only as a physical thing. And yet they themselves turn sex into a purely physical thing, saying that sex is essentially masturbation. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/01/26 06:38 PM |
| 0 | It's really funny when people bring up the idea of "you don't need sex - you can just jerk off" and then complain about men who only want sex.This is about the emotional aspect of sex. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/01/26 06:36 PM |
| 8 | It's really funny when people bring up the idea of "you don't need sex - you can just jerk off" and then complain about men who only want sex.Do you treat these people like pulseless corpses? Or do you have at least some minimal communication, flirtation... Mutual desire and consent... And all that? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/01/26 06:30 PM |
| 1 | It's really funny when people bring up the idea of "you don't need sex - you can just jerk off" and then complain about men who only want sex.You can't communicate with people sexually without sexually intimate actions (this is not just PiV) | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/01/26 06:29 PM |
| -4 | It's really funny when people bring up the idea of "you don't need sex - you can just jerk off" and then complain about men who only want sex.First of all, no. Some emotional connections don't require much time, even for those who are quite deep (love at first sight, oneitis, puppy love, etc. definitely exist), so you don't need much time. Secondly, an emotional connection is essentially communication with real people-especially those who reciprocate your sexual/romantic desires (even for a short time). | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/01/26 06:28 PM |
| 1 | It's really funny when people bring up the idea of "you don't need sex - you can just jerk off" and then complain about men who only want sex.The point is that people with the position I described are completely contradictory. They simultaneously don't want sex without emotion, yet they equate sex with masturbation and strip it of its emotional subtext. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/01/26 06:21 PM |
| 1 | It's really funny when people bring up the idea of "you don't need sex - you can just jerk off" and then complain about men who only want sex.I can agree with that, but it always surprised me. Like, can't women still feel validated by the men they're attracted to? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/01/26 06:19 PM |
| -2 | It's really funny when people bring up the idea of "you don't need sex - you can just jerk off" and then complain about men who only want sex.Even in this kind of sex there is an emotional component from feeling with a living person who reciprocates your desire and communication. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/01/26 06:17 PM |
| 0 | It's really funny when people bring up the idea of "you don't need sex - you can just jerk off" and then complain about men who only want sex.But everything else I listed is still valid. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/01/26 06:16 PM |
| 0 | It's really funny when people bring up the idea of "you don't need sex - you can just jerk off" and then complain about men who only want sex.And I agree that this isn't an immediate biological need without which you will die. But pretending it's simply a desire, denying that need is a concept far more profound than biology, is wrong. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/01/26 06:15 PM |
| -2 | It's really funny when people bring up the idea of "you don't need sex - you can just jerk off" and then complain about men who only want sex.I describe it as the difference between having sex with a living person and a rubber object. If you want to ignore all the emotional underpinnings of a romantic/sexual relationship, I won't be able to convince you otherwise. But even the desire for validation is completely normal and natural, you will not get romantic/sexual validation from masturbation.Hope that helps. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/01/26 06:12 PM |
| -1 | It's really funny when people bring up the idea of "you don't need sex - you can just jerk off" and then complain about men who only want sex.>What emotional meaning Well, the basics are communication with living people, without which you will go crazy or die. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/01/26 06:09 PM |
| -1 | It's really funny when people bring up the idea of "you don't need sex - you can just jerk off" and then complain about men who only want sex.And this is certainly respectable , a very few people want to be a living fleshlight. Just as few people want to masturbate instead of being in a romantically positive relationship. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/01/26 06:08 PM |
| 2 | It's really funny when people bring up the idea of "you don't need sex - you can just jerk off" and then complain about men who only want sex.This only applies to people who don't understand that masturbation doesn't replace sex in any way due to the emotional component. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/01/26 06:06 PM |
| 1 | It's really funny when people bring up the idea of "you don't need sex - you can just jerk off" and then complain about men who only want sex.Of course, you can achieve this without waiting years. There are things people call crush, oneitits, puppy love, unrequited love, etc. Not to mention that the emotional aspect is also expressed in real-life communication with a living person, reciprocity, flirting, sexual emotional validation, which is only available from a romantic/sexual partner (whether temporary or permanent). Moreover, sex is an emotional need for 99% of humanity, and you can only think differently if you believe that needs… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/01/26 06:05 PM |
| 0 | It's really funny when people bring up the idea of "you don't need sex - you can just jerk off" and then complain about men who only want sex.About how some people have to read the post they're replying to. And if they don't want to reply, they can go to Automod. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/01/26 06:02 PM |
| 0 | It's really funny when people bring up the idea of "you don't need sex - you can just jerk off" and then complain about men who only want sex.Of course, you can achieve this without waiting years. There are things people call crush, oneitits, puppy love, unrequited love, etc. Not to mention that the emotional aspect is also expressed in real-life communication with a living person, reciprocity, flirting, sexual emotional validation, which is only available from a romantic/sexual partner (whether temporary or permanent). | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/01/26 06:01 PM |
| 1 | Men who complain about women wanting terrible men also complain about women who actually want good men.And yet, there are universal criteria and expectations for how people treat their partners. For example, it's abnormal for them to be abusive, cheat, unwilling to engage in any sexual interaction or even discuss it, etc. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/01/26 10:24 PM |
| 1 | Men who complain about women wanting terrible men also complain about women who actually want good men.You literally said I didn’t understand correctly in the prior comment. Your words exactly: “Because your translation of my original comments is definitely wrong.” So… the my original comment under the OP's post to which you started responding….I was talking about it... It is contradictory to want a “modest” woman who is a wonton slut with him— women who are modest and sexually cautious are not magically converted to an instant turbo slut, even for chaaaad. It’s literally impossible to be the mod… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/01/26 10:21 PM |
| -1 | Men who complain about women wanting terrible men also complain about women who actually want good men.Maybe because it's not always on purpose?.... | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/01/26 10:19 PM |
| 1 | Men who complain about women wanting terrible men also complain about women who actually want good men.Why don’t women ever think about how the men feel or how things affect them. The focus is ALWAYS on women | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/01/26 10:18 PM |
| 0 | "Really good people don't demand a reward!" is bullshit logic.Well, no, there are still a lot of people who beat up their partners and they're okay with it... So no, it's not a basic level.… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/01/26 10:13 PM |
| 0 | "Really good people don't demand a reward!" is bullshit logic.Okay…😳 | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/01/26 09:34 PM |
| 1 | Men who complain about women wanting terrible men also complain about women who actually want good men.You literally said I didn’t understand correctly in the prior comment. Your words exactly: “Because your translation of my original comments is definitely wrong.” So… the my original comment under the OP's post to which you started responding….I was talking about it... It is contradictory to want a “modest” woman who is a wonton slut with him— women who are modest and sexually cautious are not magically converted to an instant turbo slut, even for chaaaad. It’s literally impossible to be the mod… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/01/26 09:33 PM |
| 1 | Men who complain about women wanting terrible men also complain about women who actually want good men.You literally said I didn’t understand correctly in the prior comment. Your words exactly: “Because your translation of my original comments is definitely wrong.” So… the my original comment under the OP's post to which you started responding….I was talking about it... It is contradictory to want a “modest” woman who is a wonton slut with him— women who are modest and sexually cautious are not magically converted to an instant turbo slut, even for chaaaad. It’s literally impossible to be the mod… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/01/26 08:34 PM |
| 1 | Men who complain about women wanting terrible men also complain about women who actually want good men.And you didn’t guess any times either. Almost as though you just make wild guesses so you can hate on a woman. … exactly like I was saying— you make up a sexual history of a woman based on nothing at all! And at the same time I wrote this: «But I may be wrong, I don't like making false assumptions.» And it’s means I didn’t want to make wrong guesses... And here, like I expected, it’s noting but insults— all women are automatically bad no matter their actual history! As expected. 🙄. Weird you vie… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/01/26 08:31 PM |
| 1 | Men who complain about women wanting terrible men also complain about women who actually want good men.You literally said I didn’t understand correctly in the prior comment. Your words exactly: “Because your translation of my original comments is definitely wrong.” So… the my original comment under the OP's post to which you started responding….I was talking about it... It is contradictory to want a “modest” woman who is a wonton slut with him— women who are modest and sexually cautious are not magically converted to an instant turbo slut, even for chaaaad. It’s literally impossible to be the mod… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/01/26 08:30 PM |
| 1 | Men Need to Stop Debating Women and do the WorkThe problem is that this isn't a demand for empathy for «losers». There's no need to demand empathy at all; it's something that supposedly "BlueP" women here should have, since they consider themselves good people. Having empathy is a pretty basic thing, and there should be no doubt that most women have it. At the very least, they should possess basic logic and an understanding of cause and effect, and understand why some men are the way they are. Furthermore, there's no demand that women change… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/01/26 08:25 PM |
| 1 | Men who complain about women wanting terrible men also complain about women who actually want good men.You literally said I didn’t understand correctly in the prior comment. Your words exactly: “Because your translation of my original comments is definitely wrong.” So… the my original comment under the OP's post to which you started responding….I was talking about it... It is contradictory to want a “modest” woman who is a wonton slut with him— women who are modest and sexually cautious are not magically converted to an instant turbo slut, even for chaaaad. It’s literally impossible to be the mod… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/01/26 08:09 PM |
| 1 | Men who complain about women wanting terrible men also complain about women who actually want good men.Thank you for sharing such personal information, even though it wasn't necessary. But it's funny that now I can appreciate that I probably have a little more dating experience than you, even though you have marriage experience and I don't (though I do have experience living together). | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/01/26 06:38 PM |
| 0 | Men who complain about women wanting terrible men also complain about women who actually want good men.No, telling you that your words are jumbled is not an insult. I guessed, but again, you didn’t even ask a question. How was I supposed to know there was a question. And you still understood everything perfectly. No woman can possibly live up to their expectations, because they literally do not want a cautious sexually reserved woman. They want a woman who is an instant wanton turbo-slut with him. So now you're also feeling indignant that someone might want genuine sexual attraction from their pa… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/01/26 06:32 PM |
| 3 | Men who complain about women wanting terrible men also complain about women who actually want good men.>If you can't read your own writing, then this is the last time I'm replying This should be my response. Considering that I wrote everything clearly and concisely, and you came up with something of your own. >So once again, you encouraging men to not get into relationship because they want love, but because they want sex. Where did I write this?... Besides the fact that you are again separating sex and romance as different things. >Considering you think "Dont do romantic things for sex. Do it fo… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/01/26 04:53 PM |
| 0 | Men who complain about women wanting terrible men also complain about women who actually want good men.🧐 | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/01/26 04:34 PM |
| 1 | Men who complain about women wanting terrible men also complain about women who actually want good men.You seem to be the same woman we talked to… with 10+ years of marriage experience and zero dating knowledge? Okay, then I'll unironically believe you, those men were wrong. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/01/26 04:34 PM |
| 2 | Men who complain about women wanting terrible men also complain about women who actually want good men.>It is not an insult Yeah, it was, because then you understood everything without any problems >My answer is that guys who are cynical just blanket assume any woman who isn’t hideous has a long history of fucking casually. They will use any visual clue or rumor to assume the worst so that they can feel justified in treating her like she’s unworthy of love or even consideration. So they're supposedly looking for any excuse to leave her, and if she does live up to their expectations, they'll stay … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/01/26 04:31 PM |
| 1 | Asexual women need to stop attributing their qualities to all women.You seem to be determined to misunderstand what I'm saying. Sex is part of a romantic relationship if both people agree to it. I'm not talking about forcing anyone. Sex is a result of romance And?… Romance and romantic relationship arent the same thing 99% of humanity considers these things to be inextricably linked. How is saying Sex should be a mutually consented pleasurable activity anti-human and cruel? That makes no sense. Probably because you should have read the full message. «If you're o… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/01/26 04:22 PM |
| 0 | Men who complain about women wanting terrible men also complain about women who actually want good men.This is a very good attempt to insult instead of actually answering😉 | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/01/26 04:09 PM |
| 1 | Asexual women need to stop attributing their qualities to all women.Sex isnt a part of romance. It is a result of romance. Like a side effect «Im not arguing that Sex isnt a part of a romantic relationship. Or that Sex in itself is a fun activity.» Sex is a want. Not a need. And people go through times without it perfectly fine. Its fun to have. But not needed for the survival of the individual. If you're one of those who says that need is only something without which you won't immediately die biologically, then I see no point in arguing. This point of view is e… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/01/26 04:07 PM |
| 2 | Asexual women need to stop attributing their qualities to all women.The idea for this post had been in my drafts for several months, but my recent posts spurred me on. I agree with you on this. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/01/26 04:00 PM |
| 1 | CMV: there's a greater chance of you getting with a woman if you are ok getting rejected by herNo, that really doesn't sound very good. I understand that there are some women who want a man to "conquer" them, but that's not all women. And for those who enjoy it, it will diminish any chances of any positive outcome. Not to mention that it's unlikely to bring any pleasure to a man either—courting after someone who expresses dissatisfaction with you. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/01/26 03:46 PM |
| 1 | Asexual women need to stop attributing their qualities to all women.If you missed a few messages I wrote to you, carefully explaining that sex is an important part of romance—and romance is an important part of most people's lives (the 1% of asexuals and aromantics you're talking about)... Then yes, I agree that for 1% of humanity, sex isn't a need. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/01/26 03:43 PM |
| 1 | Asexual women need to stop attributing their qualities to all women.Honestly, it's really ironic that you started writing that under this post. That made me laugh, thank you. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/01/26 03:27 PM |
| 0 | Men who complain about women wanting terrible men also complain about women who actually want good men.>It doesn’t matter how actually virginal she is, these guys will assume she’s a slut who used to get a train run on her by an NFL team or whatever. And this is a lie, because this only if does not exist information about who you're dating... | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/01/26 03:12 PM |
| 1 | Asexual women need to stop attributing their qualities to all women.>You don’t know that So you're not straight? Then okay. >we’ve all got experience talking to women but if you’ve not got relationships experience you shouldn’t be allowed to comment either You're kind of contradicting yourself here... Because you've hardly ever been in a romantic relationship with a woman or even asked one out. Unlike the guys who haven't asked women out this year (though that doesn't mean they've never done it). Or the guys who haven't had any relationships at all (but they've … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/01/26 03:10 PM |
| 1 | Asexual women need to stop attributing their qualities to all women.>Im not arguing that Sex isnt a part of a romantic relationship >And you can have a romantic relationship without Sex. 😣 | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/01/26 03:05 PM |
| 5 | Why do you demand empathy/sympathy from men? What do you think will change?Yes, it is very noticeable in many women here. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/01/26 01:42 PM |
| 0 | "Men should listen to women" yeah and women have radically differentiating opinionsThe main thing to understand here is that, on average, women won't be as interested in your well-being as men. This is especially true online, where many women are deeply resentful of men, but despite feeling resentment, they can't really do anything about it. So they literally enjoy making the opposite statements, or outright deceiving men. The only women who can truly help you are the women in your life who care about you. For me, it works like this. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/01/26 01:39 PM |
| 4 | Why do you demand empathy/sympathy from women? What do you think will change?It really helps with mental health. Which is already amazing. Not to mention that this can also help directly see cause-and-effect relationships and thereby develop an action plan to improve the situation. For example, with this understanding, women could, if they so desired, give more effective advice to men rather than the same platitudes that are out of touch with reality. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/01/26 01:32 PM |
| 4 | Men who complain about women wanting terrible men also complain about women who actually want good men.>That is NOT what you said. >"Men don't really like it when they're treated differently when other men weren't." is what you said. Did you make this up in your head? >Why do they deserve the same treatment as other men? Let me repeat, if you like someone, you will behave in the best possible way towards them. >He most likely did something different from the other guys. It's fair he doesn't get the same treatment. How could he act differently from other men? No, he acted exactly the same way with… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/01/26 01:28 PM |
| 0 | Asexual women need to stop attributing their qualities to all women.Sex is an integral part of relationships. Relationships are an integral part of social relationships.... | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/01/26 01:24 PM |
| 0 | Asexual women need to stop attributing their qualities to all women.Yes, and it's quite funny. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/01/26 01:23 PM |
| -1 | Asexual women need to stop attributing their qualities to all women.You haven't spoken to women with romantic intentions... | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/01/26 01:23 PM |
| 2 | What are the signs that a woman is genuinely desired - and not just settled for as the available option?It's clear... If someone has an emotional-physical reaction to physical intimacy = he doesn't want sex. Okay… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/01/26 12:02 PM |
| 16 | Why do you demand empathy/sympathy from women? What do you think will change?Empathy is something good people have. But even not-so-good people still have logical thinking and an understanding of cause-and-effect relationships. So this isn't an unreasonable demand, but rather a expectation from women who supposedly position themselves as "good, experienced" people. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/01/26 12:01 PM |
| 7 | Men who complain about women wanting terrible men also complain about women who actually want good men.>Why do they deserve the same treatment? If you like someone, you usually treat them with the best of intentions. This is a sign of your sincerity. If someone says "I love you" but avoids you, something is clearly fishy. >They are. Shallow women want hot/rich guys. Women who value morals and stability vet more. It's that simple. Some guys suck at all of those things. Again, trying to portray this as just something that "shallow people" do. >I'm saying they dont even like the women who didn't hav… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/01/26 11:58 AM |
| -2 | What are the signs that a woman is genuinely desired - and not just settled for as the available option?So you didn't read that I only said something about sexual attraction. And then I described all the other aspects of the test separately?.... I see.... | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/01/26 11:53 AM |
| 3 | Asexual women need to stop attributing their qualities to all women.They literally met women and talked to them, trying to ask them out on a date... It's a small but valuable experience. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/01/26 11:51 AM |
| -1 | Asexual women need to stop attributing their qualities to all women.>Food and water is a need because you die if you dont have it Just like social interaction. Even now, it's important for mental health, not to mention that it was even more important in the past due to the difficulty of survival. >You can't "hand over" sex and you cant take sex back. Sex is a activity. Like tennis. And... What does this change? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/01/26 11:50 AM |
| 5 | Asexual women need to stop attributing their qualities to all women.Trying to insult is good move | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/01/26 11:47 AM |
| -4 | What are the signs that a woman is genuinely desired - and not just settled for as the available option?It's much simpler because men are more intuitive and clear. If a man gets an erection for you, then he's attracted to you, and you shouldn't be afraid. But seriously, there's evidence that men, on average, have a higher libido and rate women as more attractive. Also, there's a lot of fetishism among them, which allows even the least attractive women to find someone they're attracted to. But of course they are also necessary basic checks of your future partner regarding values, morals, family rel… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/01/26 11:45 AM |
| 10 | Men who complain about women wanting terrible men also complain about women who actually want good men.1) Men don't really like it when they're treated differently when other men weren't. We all know that genuine love can cloud judgment, etc.; this is a normal human reaction. Yes, this is normal, but it's not so normal when this is denied and it's said that these evaluation criteria were applied to all men, even though this is not true. 2) Men don't really like it when criteria are applied to them that weren't applied to other people. Of course, people change and grow; that's normal. And it's equ… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/01/26 11:37 AM |
| 2 | Asexual women need to stop attributing their qualities to all women.If you don't want to see the context, you won't see it. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/01/26 11:22 AM |
| 1 | Asexual women need to stop attributing their qualities to all women.I actually agree with this. But it's important for these same people to write about who they are and what perspective they're speaking from. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/01/26 11:13 AM |
| – | Asexual women need to stop attributing their qualities to all women.<image> If you're only trying to read one message out of ten in three different threads, then you might think so. I'm not going to stop you from trying to embarrass yourself. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/01/26 11:12 AM |
| 0 | Asexual women need to stop attributing their qualities to all women.https://preview.redd.it/od3sgb6mb3eg1.jpeg?width=638&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=7bd4ee172d490fd8c8797dae62257676a9273b98 Notice how, even after I wrote about reciprocity and the desire for a relationship in my very first comment, you continued to repeat that "men only want to be in relationships for sex." | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/01/26 11:08 AM |
| 3 | Asexual women need to stop attributing their qualities to all women.If you want But you should also consider that their numbers are still higher. Not to mention that there's also no evidence that they haven't tried to get dates, meaning they do have experience. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/01/26 10:53 AM |
| 0 | Asexual women need to stop attributing their qualities to all women.Because I still go online sometimes (but not very often). And I can clearly see that even on Reddit there are communities with literally tens of millions of users and posts like this. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/01/26 10:10 AM |
| 0 | Asexual women need to stop attributing their qualities to all women.https://preview.redd.it/4tnh93u713eg1.jpeg?width=994&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=ebe8071ae609b8d7d4e70548f63b57ee7c985f41 | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/01/26 10:09 AM |
| 1 | Asexual women need to stop attributing their qualities to all women.And still nothing prevents this minority from being quite widespread locally in some places and pretending that they are the majority.… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/01/26 10:04 AM |
| -1 | Asexual women need to stop attributing their qualities to all women.So you're lying again and not reading what I'm writing to you. Okay, thanks again. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/01/26 10:03 AM |
| 1 | Asexual women need to stop attributing their qualities to all women.And there's also constant humiliation of men who want sex even in relationships. But there's no problem with even just wanting sex outside of a relationship. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/01/26 10:01 AM |
| -1 | Asexual women need to stop attributing their qualities to all women.>I dont think asexual women claim they are representative of women overall. Interestingly I see a lot more people claim women to be asexual because for a lot of women sex just works different than for men. You can see that all over the relationship reddit. If someone doesn't want to have sex at a certain point you can almost guarantee there will be a comment like "maybe they are asexual". I can agree that this happens. But then you also need to agree that there is constant humiliation of men who… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/01/26 10:00 AM |
| 4 | Asexual women need to stop attributing their qualities to all women.Believe it or not, I've had this post in my drafts for a long time. While she's one of the users who perfectly displays my post, she's far from alone. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/01/26 09:55 AM |
| 1 | Asexual women need to stop attributing their qualities to all women.>Which comment thread did you say that in? I already sent you a link to this in another comment here. You were probably delighted that it was "even more proof you were right." However, you eventually deleted that comment, as you probably realized the opposite was true and your manipulation hadn't worked. But I'll give it to you one more time | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/01/26 09:53 AM |
| 2 | Asexual women need to stop attributing their qualities to all women.I've already told you the source of my thoughts, so if you want to ignore it, that's your right. Good luck. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/01/26 09:01 AM |
| 5 | Asexual women need to stop attributing their qualities to all women.What I said: And that's still infinitely better than actively harming this woman. Especially since this man is also likely genuinely in love with her, which can be considered a "genuine character." The response: He does things because he genuinely loves her, not because he hopes it results in pussy in the future. What I said: So, if you love someone, you don't want sex with them. Okay, I get it, we can end the discussion. The response:This is what people are talking about when they say "The Redp… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/01/26 08:59 AM |
| 1 | Asexual women need to stop attributing their qualities to all women.We also need this example | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/01/26 08:52 AM |
| 4 | Asexual women need to stop attributing their qualities to all women.>You wrote that people must hate sex if they want someone to do romantic gestures because they care, not because they want sex as a reward. And no, you've made up something I didn't say again. Thanks again, really, now no one in the comments will say they want examples of what I said. Because you demonstrate everything perfectly. >So no proof, got it. This is my line, you stole it >Gonna edit my post to cite where this was not said in one of the conversations address sex and relationships. It wo… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/01/26 08:32 AM |
| 6 | Asexual women need to stop attributing their qualities to all women.>No I didnt. There’s a difference between “sex is important” and “Im only in this for the sex”. You still have to believe other shit is important. Oh, thanks for once again confirming my post when I didn't mention anything about wanting only sex. Just like in my last post, I wrote about relationships in general in every comment, which you also ignored. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/01/26 08:23 AM |
| 2 | Asexual women need to stop attributing their qualities to all women.Because they are specifically represented here and participate in the discussion, presenting themselves as the norm and even shaming others. And as far as I understand, the blocking function is not very welcome here, so I don’t usually use it. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/01/26 08:21 AM |
| 2 | Asexual women need to stop attributing their qualities to all women.Because they're widely represented here. I agree that there aren't that many of them in reality. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/01/26 08:18 AM |
| 8 | Asexual women need to stop attributing their qualities to all women.>How is that relevant to the conversation? Are you trying to pivot because you know how bad that looks for a man to only want a relationship for the sex? Thank you for confirming my post and comment again when I didn't write anything about wanting only sex. >Reference those posts. I said I have dated men that arent conventionally attractive, which I thought guys wanted since they bitch about women being too picky when it comes to looks. Of course, now I'll only find this among your 1000+ posts h… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/01/26 08:17 AM |
| 6 | Asexual women need to stop attributing their qualities to all women.Yes, I can agree with that. But I've seen this sometimes in isolated women's communities online, but never in real life. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/01/26 08:12 AM |
| 5 | Asexual women need to stop attributing their qualities to all women.Couldn't it be that it's a minority that's complaining about something?... Oh okay | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/01/26 08:10 AM |
| 2 | Asexual women need to stop attributing their qualities to all women.Keep in mind that this user constantly ignores messages that sex is a necessary part of a relationship. Just as she doesn't see anything separate in a relationship or friendship, so it's not just asexuality but also aromanticism. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/01/26 08:09 AM |
| -2 | Asexual women need to stop attributing their qualities to all women.I'd agree that they want sex too, if they didn't write that they don't want it. And it would be nice if they didn't constantly deny that sex is an integral part of a relationship. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/01/26 08:06 AM |
| 1 | Asexual women need to stop attributing their qualities to all women.This would be considered a violation of the subreddit rules and a witchhunt. But one of the users I'm talking about has already appeared in the comments, so you should be able to find it easily. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/01/26 08:04 AM |
| 11 | Asexual women need to stop attributing their qualities to all women.And you had entire posts where you wrote that you "don't see the difference between romance and friendship," posts where you said you dated people you didn't find attractive, posts and comments constantly shaming men for "just wanting sex" when they've texted you 100 times that they want a relationship. You're the perfect example of everything I said. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/01/26 08:03 AM |
| 1 | "Really good people don't demand a reward!" is bullshit logic.Honestly, this is an amazing comment and I really couldn't have explained it better. Thank you | /r/PurplePillDebate | 16/01/26 06:27 AM |
| -1 | "Really good people don't demand a reward!" is bullshit logic.Yes, that's exactly the straw-man. For some mysterious reason, she desperately can't understand that sex is part of a relationship, and so she tries to imagine that men don't want relationships, only sex. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 16/01/26 06:19 AM |
| 1 | "Really good people don't demand a reward!" is bullshit logic.Solondthewookiee, i think | /r/PurplePillDebate | 16/01/26 06:12 AM |
| 1 | "Really good people don't demand a reward!" is bullshit logic.>Recognition is a thank you or people showing ways that they care back. Is that what you decided in your head? Okay. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/01/26 08:27 PM |
| 5 | "Really good people don't demand a reward!" is bullshit logic.I realized that if you love someone, you don't want to fuck them. You already said that. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/01/26 08:26 PM |
| 2 | "Really good people don't demand a reward!" is bullshit logic.>That's what I mean when I say "The Redpill is felony-based". You think guys are good because they're better than criminals, not because they do more than the average person Considering that many even real criminals have sex successfully and start relationships, then... This is not to mention not very good men who also have no problems >He does things because he genuinely loves her, not because he hopes it results in pussy in the future. So, if you love someone, you don't want sex with them. Oka… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/01/26 08:25 PM |
| -2 | "Really good people don't demand a reward!" is bullshit logic.>It’s not that people don’t think good people deserve recognition, but rather, that recognition =/= sex. When some guy helps you out at work, do you pull down your pants and bend over? When your buddy helps you fix your car, do you give him a blowjob? That’s the problem here. I'm talking about this more in the context of romance and sex, not relationships with colleagues. It would be nice if moral could at least be a partial criterion for choosing a partner. >Women don’t receive any greater reco… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/01/26 08:21 PM |
| 1 | "Really good people don't demand a reward!" is bullshit logic.And again, there is a lack of understanding of the principles of reciprocity | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/01/26 08:15 PM |
| 1 | "Really good people don't demand a reward!" is bullshit logic.Of course, when you're making up my replicas for me, it's hard to call it a debate. Especially when I have to constantly repeat myself because you keep not reading what I write. I'm not cosplaying Sisyphus. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/01/26 08:14 PM |
| 1 | "Really good people don't demand a reward!" is bullshit logic.If the principles of romantic and sexual reciprocity (when both partners are interested in each other) are inhumane to you, then I don’t even know what to tell you”... | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/01/26 08:12 PM |
| 2 | "Really good people don't demand a reward!" is bullshit logic.>Ok, so it's not transactional Yeah, it's more about reciprocity. >I don't recall saying anything about the "harm of nice guys." So there is still a problem with reading ability. «Because as soon as that reward isn't given, they turn back into assholes. I don't want people around me who are going to be assholes the moment I don't give them what they want» | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/01/26 08:10 PM |
| -2 | "Really good people don't demand a reward!" is bullshit logic.>My presence and especially the holes of my body are not a reward. My husband doesn't see me as some trophy for having been a decent human and having sex with me wasn't some plaque in honor of his goodness. And yet, you and your husband were a mutual reward for each other for making each other fall in love with you, for proving yourselves to be worthy people, etc. >Do good deeds, don't do good deeds. It makes little difference to me, I will judge people accordingly and being a good person who do… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/01/26 08:06 PM |
| -1 | "Really good people don't demand a reward!" is bullshit logic.Rather, this post is an example of the search for reciprocity and decency in society and for people to treat each other with respect. But let it be as you think. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/01/26 08:02 PM |
| -1 | "Really good people don't demand a reward!" is bullshit logic.Hmm... It's hard to argue with someone who doesn't read what you write and makes up words for you... | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/01/26 08:00 PM |
| 1 | "Really good people don't demand a reward!" is bullshit logic.>Let me add to what she said. When a man says "I was nice, where's my reward?" - this very statement reveals the kindness wasn't what it appeared to be. It was done more as manipulation than from genuine character. And that's still infinitely better than actively harming this woman. Especially since this man is also likely genuinely in love with her, which can be considered a "genuine character." | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/01/26 07:59 PM |
| – | "Really good people don't demand a reward!" is bullshit logic.Yes, I can probably agree with that. And I'm actually against this approach. It's simply exploitative and truly transactional. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/01/26 07:55 PM |
| – | "Really good people don't demand a reward!" is bullshit logic.Yes, there is such a thing and it’s kind of ironic that they behave exactly the same way to those they so dislike… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/01/26 07:54 PM |
| 1 | "Really good people don't demand a reward!" is bullshit logic.In fact, I was taught from childhood to be as selfless as possible. I'm still a bit like that. And I can also understand why a truly kind person would be highly valued. >Sure, you may be rewarded by others, but no one "owes" you anything. But I find this approach actively horrible and exploitative/toxic. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/01/26 07:53 PM |
| 2 | "Really good people don't demand a reward!" is bullshit logic.>don’t believe this means we should have sex as a reward for doing good behaviour when it’s unasked for. I'm more saying that it would be nice to have this as a criterion for selecting a partner, rather than forcing someone to have sex. >You don’t have to be we should stop rewarding bad behaviour atleast to set the record straight might I add every time there is a villain or joker like character women fantasize about the bad guy. Thus reinforcing the narrative it never pays to be Peter Parker. O… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/01/26 07:51 PM |
| 1 | "Really good people don't demand a reward!" is bullshit logic.Hmm... I hadn't previously considered that they had anything in common with this thinking here. I'll have to check it out, thanks for the tip. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/01/26 07:49 PM |
| 0 | "Really good people don't demand a reward!" is bullshit logic.>They still ought to pay you back in some fashion so they don’t take advantage of your generosity, I don’t think many would disagree with that, but the issues with all of this is squarely on the active demand. The problem is that if they don't reciprocate and you stop helping them so much, you'll be branded a freak for it. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/01/26 07:47 PM |
| 3 | "Really good people don't demand a reward!" is bullshit logic.>You can be an asshole without being aggressive And?… >No, attention and communication are not a transaction Yes it’s is. Not so directly transactional, but based on the principle of reciprocity that is related >I have no idea how this is relevant to good people not needing rewards for being good people. I also didn't understand how your comment about the "harm of nice guys" is related to my post, but here we are | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/01/26 07:44 PM |
| 0 | "Really good people don't demand a reward!" is bullshit logic.Nope, I think my reading skills are just fine So think again because it definitely not so | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/01/26 07:42 PM |
| -1 | "Really good people don't demand a reward!" is bullshit logic.«Even if not for morality, then at least for successfully seducing/making someone you like fall in love with you. And the feeling is mutual, since they also actively participate in it.» | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/01/26 07:41 PM |
| -1 | "Really good people don't demand a reward!" is bullshit logic.Already explained this in the comment above | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/01/26 07:40 PM |
| 1 | "Really good people don't demand a reward!" is bullshit logic.So by that standard, should everyone want to "reward" everyone daily for not murdering anyone? This is a baseline societal standard, not an indicator of someone who deserves a "reward." This isn't about murder, but rather about a general lack of bad behavior. And unfortunately, this isn't a "baseline societal standard," but rather a specific characteristic. Perhaps this used to be a basic requirement, back when societies were smaller and the institution of reputation was important—it was necessa… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/01/26 07:35 PM |
| 9 | "Really good people don't demand a reward!" is bullshit logic.I don't support aggression after rejection. But overall, it's not a 100% common occurrence. What I've seen much more often are women complaining that men have stopped giving them a lot of attention (so, transaction) or that they've stopped communicating with them. And here's my question for these women: do you really want to watch your crush with someone else? Their relationship, maybe sex from the side? Then I'm probably happy for you, but it's a rare fetish, and most people don't enjoy it. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/01/26 07:26 PM |
| 3 | "Really good people don't demand a reward!" is bullshit logic.>I think that doing something nice to get a reward is not the same thing as doing something nice from the bottom of your heart. I can understand that “it’s not so sincere” and so on, but the most important thing here is that this is not an actively bad action, but even an actively good one. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/01/26 07:23 PM |
| 0 | "Really good people don't demand a reward!" is bullshit logic.I don't think blue pill is capable of understanding basic reading skills >Even if not for morality, then at least for successfully seducing/making someone you like fall in love with you. And the feeling is mutual, since they also actively participate in it. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/01/26 07:19 PM |
| 0 | "Really good people don't demand a reward!" is bullshit logic.>If you not talking about sex and relationships what kind of "reward" are you talking about. Perhaps sex and romance (more likely romance) can be defined as a reward, but I am also speaking in general about people who are generally against rewarding morality in any way. >Getting sex isn't a reward. >reward: a thing given in recognition of one's service, effort, or achievement. >If sex was a reward then it inherently wouldn't be mutual. I don't fuck someone as a thank you for their service. I fuc… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/01/26 07:17 PM |
| 1 | Is Vetting Seen as a Red FlagThere's no problem at all with vetting your future partner. After all, it's part of the dating process. The problem is rather that many men notice that many women do not seem to check out certain men. And that would be fine, but these same women usually actively lie about their standards not being as stable as they'd like. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/01/26 07:14 PM |
| 3 | "Really good people don't demand a reward!" is bullshit logic.>The fallacious assumption in this post is that simps and sycophants are actually good people. Usually, they at least don't cause active harm, and sometimes they can even be beneficial. This can probably be seen as a positive thing. >Dudes don't even like getting glazed by other dudes. It's weird. Why would you think women like it? And why should annoying people be rewarded? And why are we even talking about suck-ups? I don't think I wrote anything like that... But even here, I suspect the "pick… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/01/26 07:12 PM |
| -6 | "Really good people don't demand a reward!" is bullshit logic.This can truly be considered a reward. Even if not for morality, then at least for successfully seducing/making someone you like fall in love with you. And the feeling is mutual, since they also actively participate in it. But I'm not just talking about sex in general. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/01/26 07:07 PM |
| 1 | Gen Z men shouldn't take dating advice from older generationsAs far as I remember, the blocking wasn't really allowed here before. And why bother? Sometimes it's funny to see "experienced, family-oriented people" act so cold-blooded and unsympathetic that even the RPs they're so afraid of look like true moral compasses. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/01/26 06:55 PM |
| 2 | Gen Z men shouldn't take dating advice from older generationsGo to any feminist space and start talking about how half the rape victims are men, and they will turn absolutely vicious. Yeah, and then they even have to talk about how "the internet is misogynistic" when even on Reddit, all communities with even the slightest masculine undertone are mercilessly blocked, when toxic women's communities are ripping off millions of users. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/01/26 03:17 PM |
| 1 | Gen Z men shouldn't take dating advice from older generationsHonestly, I'm shocked by her; she's a woman completely devoid of empathy. It's a bit creepy, to be honest, although she's been exposed as a troll here before, so I hope this is just an image and not who she really is. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/01/26 09:16 AM |
| 6 | There’s defiantly an expectation that unattractive men stay asexual/aromantic worker drone by womenIt's simple, it's just blatant dehumanization, which these women often do intentionally. They understand that the desire for sex and relationships is completely normal (1% of the population is asexual and aromantic), but they try to shame men here. I think there are two groups of women: those who consciously hate men and wish them suffering and failure (there are many of them here, and they openly say it, "Why should I help men?"); and those who are asexual/aromantic themselves but don't underst… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/01/26 03:17 PM |
| 0 | It is not necessary to use intellectualism to reject people you find repulsive.>The question isn’t about whether women are sexist for imbuing promiscuous men with more value But it has to be, because that's the reason for all this "sexism" >If we can’t agree on that as definitively sexist, then there’s no point in talking about it. Okay then. Have a good day 🤝 | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/01/26 03:11 PM |
| 1 | It is not necessary to use intellectualism to reject people you find repulsive.>It’s not a lie And this is a lie again, because I gave 3 frequency and non-sexist reasons >Most sexist beliefs are offshoots of the idea that sex intrinsically benefits men and harms women If you mean that men who have sex are perceived as more successful, then... It's probably because women perceive them that way, not men. There was a post about this recently, and there were hundreds of messages ridiculing men who can't have casual sex. So... Maybe this is something women need to change and st… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/01/26 02:50 PM |
| 2 | It is not necessary to use intellectualism to reject people you find repulsive.>There’s not a non-sexist reason to hate women for sleeping with men And... It's actually a lie. There are at least three basic reasons. 1) Few people enjoy having their loved one fucked/loved by someone else, whether in the past, present, or future. Of course, there are people who enjoy it, but it's not very common. For both men and women. 2) Finding a partner with the same standards and views on intimacy as you. 3) Reluctance to deal with emotions, drama, and so on. It's not for nothing that e… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/01/26 02:28 PM |
| 2 | Why is virgin used as an insult if sex and relationships are supposedly not important?That this has an extremely detrimental effect on an individual's well-being? At the same time, there's no guarantee that all needs will be met 140% of the time, not even for food, water, and shelter. So no, usually when they say "sex is a need," they don't mean it must be provided at any cost; even incels are against it. I think there were a lot of posts on this topic here at one point. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 11/01/26 07:25 AM |
| 1 | Why is virgin used as an insult if sex and relationships are supposedly not important?Again classifying sex as a need is implying that being denied sex means your rights are being denied. Why? Nobody says that. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/01/26 08:44 PM |
| 1 | Why is virgin used as an insult if sex and relationships are supposedly not important?Again classifying sex as a need is implying that being denied sex means your rights are being denied. Why? Nobody says that. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/01/26 08:43 PM |
| 6 | Why is virgin used as an insult if sex and relationships are supposedly not important?>Yes it would. Most people could live happy lives with just having a really great close circle of really good friends without having sex No, because asexuals, aromantics, and so on are 1% of the population. Everyone else needs it for sanity and a fulfilling social life. >Because sex doesn't create or give companionship at all. Its just a thing you can do with anyone and you don't have to have affection, love, or connection to have sex Sex directly creates companionship because it is an integral … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/01/26 08:08 PM |
| 6 | Why is virgin used as an insult if sex and relationships are supposedly not important?>But tje guy literally just made it about only sex. Someone said family and friends and hobbies and the guy responded "you cant have sex with those" It was just a quick answer that platonic interactions would not cover 100% of the need. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/01/26 07:54 PM |
| – | Why is virgin used as an insult if sex and relationships are supposedly not important?>You can live a full, meaningful life without it. You can have friends, purpose, love, creativity, a career, children through adoption, joy, status, legacy No, purely because these are platonic interactions. Romance and sex are an ESSENTIAL need for people. Again, 1% of the population is asexual. Moreover, besides the fact that sex is part of a social need, it is a basic biological imperative to pass on one's genes (which adoption doesn't address at all, since you essentially don't have a full t… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/01/26 07:53 PM |
| – | Why is virgin used as an insult if sex and relationships are supposedly not important?>As you can have a fulfilling social life without having sex No, because 99% of people are not asexual. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/01/26 07:21 PM |
| 4 | Why is virgin used as an insult if sex and relationships are supposedly not important?You understand that it's not just about sex, but about the relationship as a whole, right? But…Even if it were just about sex, it's still important, because sex is the foundation of a relationship, without which it's impossible (I repeat, asexuals are 1% of the population; everyone else needs sex). | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/01/26 07:20 PM |
| 9 | How comfortable would you be if you found out the person you were dating had “lowered their standards” for you or “was giving you a chance”?What you need to understand is that people who want someone to "lower their standards" want the person doing so to not feel negative or "settling." That is, while maintaining their primary, important standards, the other person consciously abandons at least some of their secondary standards. I'll give you an example to explain: I'm currently in a relationship with a girl who completely meets my needs. Literally everything I care about is that everything is fine and exactly as it should be. But a… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/01/26 07:16 PM |
| 1 | Women say they can easily tell when a man is being a fake nice guy, but they friendzone those men though.However, he misses nearly 60% of them in actual games. Variables like opposing defense, mental state, fatigue and shot selection all play big parts. Similarly, no matter how good you are at detecting character, you still have to contend with all the variables involved in doing it in a real life situation, not the least of which is that some men are better at hiding it than others ("opposing defense"). So, you yourself seem to have confirmed that there is no "unique" female (or general) intuition… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 09/01/26 08:36 PM |
| 1 | "You can't know what someone is like romantically if you're just friends with them!" - the most idiotic argument>Not everyone who doesn't share your or even the mainstream's societal moral values in public is a bad partner. Not everyone who is polite in public is a good partner. Not everyone who doesn't share your or even the mainstream's societal moral values in public is a bad partner. Not everyone who is polite in public is a good partner. >And none of those are there when you are evaluating how someone treats a waiter or how they talk with their friends. These are all indicators of the most basic soci… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 08/01/26 08:39 PM |
| 2 | "You can't know what someone is like romantically if you're just friends with them!" - the most idiotic argument>I got it from how you’ve responded to people in the comments. When others bring up their experiences, you dismiss them by saying you already addressed that in the post, while treating your own experiences as establishing the rule. Then you should have seen that it was precisely other people who ignored my experience and relied solely on their own. There are literally comments like, "I've dated a manipulative abuser before, so all abusers are manipulative, and you can't see their badness in adva… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 08/01/26 08:12 PM |
| 0 | "You can't know what someone is like romantically if you're just friends with them!" - the most idiotic argument>If no one wants to be around you, there’s gotta be a reason for that So, that means bad people shouldn't have positive connections. But we know that's not true. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 08/01/26 08:07 PM |
| 1 | "You can't know what someone is like romantically if you're just friends with them!" - the most idiotic argumentSo, that was my reply to you and not yours to me?... When five people were under the same my original comment?.... And you reply me here?… Now it looks like you're fantasizing about it... That's weird... | /r/PurplePillDebate | 08/01/26 06:29 PM |
| 2 | "You can't know what someone is like romantically if you're just friends with them!" - the most idiotic argumentHe doesn't actually have any facts to disprove me, so he's using hyperbole and anecdotes as per usual for PPD. At the same time, you literally wrote that you were in a relationship with such a person and therefore have a bias on this topic.... | /r/PurplePillDebate | 08/01/26 06:27 PM |
| 1 | "You can't know what someone is like romantically if you're just friends with them!" - the most idiotic argumentThe issue is that OP is looking at it in a black and white sense rather than a spectrum of gray. While majority aren’t walking around saying they can’t wait to beat their partner or create complex psychopathic plans, majority are in between. Not everything in the world is gray, and sometimes there is both white and black (although people in love often ignore red flags....) | /r/PurplePillDebate | 08/01/26 06:26 PM |
| 0 | "You can't know what someone is like romantically if you're just friends with them!" - the most idiotic argumentYou can start googling now since you clearly haven't done an ounce of research. While you probably did some "research" and posted a link to research that contradicts your words... Okay. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 08/01/26 06:25 PM |
| 1 | "You can't know what someone is like romantically if you're just friends with them!" - the most idiotic argumentConsidering that it was you who commented on this, remembered that we wrote to each other and thought that it was personal to you, makes me think that it is yours love letter to me… Which is not good considering you supposedly have a husband... And I have standards, sorry 🥲 | /r/PurplePillDebate | 08/01/26 06:22 PM |
| 1 | "You can't know what someone is like romantically if you're just friends with them!" - the most idiotic argumentI'm happy for you and your husband. But since you've decided to get together, you've probably gotten to know him at least a little as a friend and realized he's a good guy for a romantic relationship? That is, you may not have learned everything about him, but it was enough to understand that he is not bad. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 08/01/26 04:57 PM |
| 2 | "You can't know what someone is like romantically if you're just friends with them!" - the most idiotic argument>Friendship is not the internship for dating and people do not unlock romance by accruing platonic XP. This is not what my post is about at all. >You can be a great friend and a terrible partner, or a mediocre friend and an elite partner. Dating screens for things friendship never triggers, like intimacy, loyalty under strain, conflict skills, sexual compatibility, family alignment, shared timelines, and defense against external pressure. Watching someone be nice to waiters tells you less about … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 08/01/26 04:44 PM |
| -2 | "You can't know what someone is like romantically if you're just friends with them!" - the most idiotic argumentSo you're kind of suggesting that women exhibit narcissism just like men, but they do it more covertly, making it harder to detect... Okay. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 08/01/26 04:36 PM |
| 2 | "You can't know what someone is like romantically if you're just friends with them!" - the most idiotic argument>Less women have it Yes, 7 and 5% is a huge difference (no) >NPD men are more likely to exhibit predatory and traditionally abusive behavior. Idk. Maybe NPD and testosterone is a truly toxic mix. Not to mention more men than women exhibit traits of psychopathy/sociopathy. Please, not that. Yes, women are more likely to be narcissistic on the inside in these cases, blah blah. But trying to portray men as aggressive animals is unnecessary Trying to say that: oh, one narcissism is better than anoth… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 08/01/26 04:33 PM |
| 1 | "You can't know what someone is like romantically if you're just friends with them!" - the most idiotic argumentDear troll, go away🤧 | /r/PurplePillDebate | 08/01/26 04:31 PM |
| 0 | "You can't know what someone is like romantically if you're just friends with them!" - the most idiotic argument>But even men without an NPD diagnosis are way more likely to exhibit narcissistic behaviors. Not only men >Please read some research on the topic Yeah , you too | /r/PurplePillDebate | 08/01/26 04:30 PM |
| 0 | "You can't know what someone is like romantically if you're just friends with them!" - the most idiotic argumentThis violence often surfaces in ordinary settings and situations. I've often had to warn women I know about this because they didn't notice how the man they were currently with behaved worse with other people than with them. But since everything was fine between them and they were in love, they missed these red flags. What you're describing is precisely deliberate psychopathic behavior and extreme manipulation, which doesn't happen in 1400% of domestic violence cases. But I understand that you h… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 08/01/26 04:29 PM |
| 2 | "You can't know what someone is like romantically if you're just friends with them!" - the most idiotic argumentYes, I'm talking about this post.And the post is more of a topic to men's arguments that their friends are single and good guys. Women usually respond by declaring that single men are the devil's shit, because "they're single for a reason." I had to argue with people there that no, not every man is a rapist and a brilliant manipulator who can deceive everyone for decades. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 08/01/26 02:54 PM |
| 0 | No way most men are friends with a rapist>Not "better" This is precisely «better» because of the lack of romantic and sexual interest. When people are in love with someone, they... may not see the negative.... Arguing with this is … >you're claiming infallible, that there's no way you could unknowingly be friends with a rapist. And this is a lie. I even made a post on this topic where I didn’t say that it was impossible. I just don't like idiotic arguments like: "well, according to statistics(not really), every man knows a rapist and c… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 08/01/26 02:46 PM |
| 2 | "You can't know what someone is like romantically if you're just friends with them!" - the most idiotic argumentThere's a post just below that and it has over 200 comments, so I make this | /r/PurplePillDebate | 08/01/26 02:43 PM |
| 1 | "You can't know what someone is like romantically if you're just friends with them!" - the most idiotic argumentOkay, I agree It's just that the people I speak to say that they were misled and deceived for years. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 08/01/26 02:15 PM |
| 0 | No way most men are friends with a rapistWell... yeah, a man will know other men better, and a woman will know other women better. Because if they're straight, they won't have romantic preconceptions or rose-colored glasses. That's basic knowledge... And even more so, when communicating with someone of your own gender, you will have a little more knowledge of the subtleties and nuances of their lives.... | /r/PurplePillDebate | 08/01/26 02:12 PM |
| 1 | No way most men are friends with a rapistShe makes a good point. The men in those scenarios always lead with how great of a guy he was. According to you they’re retarded. I agree. Just like men, they often claim that a "bad boy" is truly bad, which women initially disagree with. Until it bites them in the ass. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 08/01/26 02:10 PM |
| -1 | "You can't know what someone is like romantically if you're just friends with them!" - the most idiotic argument>How are you disagreeing when your own post suggests it? Because it not? >They are not saying bad people can’t have social circles they are saying the forever alone dudes with no social circles are bad people. The fact that someone is romantically or even socially alone does not speak about their moral quality. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 08/01/26 02:09 PM |
| 2 | "You can't know what someone is like romantically if you're just friends with them!" - the most idiotic argumentI can agree with this (to be fair, I myself found myself in a similar situation where it turned out that the girl I was living with was actually different), but still being friends with someone provides a certain amount of information what kind of people they are in general (and this is the most important thing, because it affects what kind of partners and friends they are and what kind of person they are) | /r/PurplePillDebate | 08/01/26 01:01 PM |
| 1 | No way most men are friends with a rapistBrilliant psychopathic freaks who are capable of deceiving dozens of people for decades? Yes, that's extremely rare. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 08/01/26 12:58 PM |
| 1 | "You can't know what someone is like romantically if you're just friends with them!" - the most idiotic argument>You’re not really debating here. You’re dismissing counterexamples by saying anyone who disagrees was blinded, ignored red flags, or is an edge case. That makes your claim unfalsifiable. I don't know where you got this, so it's bad to lie. I'm simply saying that an argument based on personal experience isn't 100% valid. Especially since I have counterexamples. Because you can't blindly follow stories like "I knew him for 10 years and he always wore masks and was different," this is not always t… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 08/01/26 12:56 PM |
| 0 | "You can't know what someone is like romantically if you're just friends with them!" - the most idiotic argument>OP I have a related question. If your thesis is true (its not) then I can conclude that the forever alone people here without a social circle are fundamentally bad people My point isn't that, but rather that if you interact with someone closely enough, sooner or later you'll have some information about them in general. And no, I disagree, as there's no evidence that bad people don't have social circles. Especially since somehow bad people still have relationships and people to interact with. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 08/01/26 12:46 PM |
| 2 | "You can't know what someone is like romantically if you're just friends with them!" - the most idiotic argument>7% of men have NPD Just like 4.8 percent of women. But this doesn't mean that 100% of women are like this, and certainly doesn't mean that there are always a few such women in certain groups. Because this is an average value, not some kind of constant. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 08/01/26 12:43 PM |
| 1 | "You can't know what someone is like romantically if you're just friends with them!" - the most idiotic argument>It’s like if your friend (who never had a violent past) comes and tells you he hates his boss. You’ll probably be like yeah he’s an asshole (boss). Then you come and find out after the dude murdered his boss. Yeah he told you he hated him but should you have called the police of that? The point here is that most people don't kill their bosses, so yeah, you won't think about it first. Because this is a rare phenomenon, just as it is a rare phenomenon for genius manipulators who have been deceivi… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 08/01/26 11:04 AM |
| 1 | No way most men are friends with a rapistMutual😘 | /r/PurplePillDebate | 08/01/26 11:01 AM |
| 2 | "You can't know what someone is like romantically if you're just friends with them!" - the most idiotic argumentWell, I've seen some of families most of my friends (though, yes, not all of them). So I can agree with you here that it's important. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 08/01/26 11:00 AM |
| 0 | "You can't know what someone is like romantically if you're just friends with them!" - the most idiotic argument>1 in 15 men have narcissistic personality disorder. It seems more like 1/20 >They're not brilliant manipulators they're mentally ill abusers I don't argue that they are sick bastards, but they definitely have some skills. >If you know 50 guys, then you know 4 men like this and probably 5 more who aspire to be And not quite, because in addition to the random distribution, there is also the direct possibility of filtering out some of these people | /r/PurplePillDebate | 08/01/26 10:59 AM |
| 1 | No way most men are friends with a rapistI fucking love the quoting function on reddit. I wish every social media app used it. It allows me to be as precise as I want. Yeah, that helps catch trolls like you quickly. By the way, it takes more effort to bold and italicise and screenshot and upload photos than a quick highlight does lol. Now you have a photo of the definition of psychopath in your phone. Heh Don't worry, it's pretty fast on iPhones) | /r/PurplePillDebate | 08/01/26 10:54 AM |
| 1 | "You can't know what someone is like romantically if you're just friends with them!" - the most idiotic argumentYeah, I'm trying to rely especially on my female friends here. They won't be particularly biased here, since they're straight and don't have the same feelings as me or other men. And, I did the same for them. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 08/01/26 10:52 AM |
| -3 | "You can't know what someone is like romantically if you're just friends with them!" - the most idiotic argument>He wasn't a piece of shit to everyone. He was actually extremely cold and calculated and could switch his mask on and off the moment he knew we were alone Sounds like he's a real psychopath and manipulator. Which I already answered in the post: "Of course, being a friend with someone you may not get 140% information about this person (like, there are brilliant Machiavellians, manipulators and others), but just like some people are hit by a meteorite or struck by lightning 7 times, this does not… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 08/01/26 10:50 AM |
| 1 | "You can't know what someone is like romantically if you're just friends with them!" - the most idiotic argumentTo be honest, I also try to do this just so I have at least some information or know that my friends will get me out of trouble if something happens. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 08/01/26 10:47 AM |
| 1 | No way most men are friends with a rapistEven though I responded to every one of your comments, expand on them and quote you... Whatever helps you sleep at night bud | /r/PurplePillDebate | 08/01/26 10:45 AM |
| 1 | "You can't know what someone is like romantically if you're just friends with them!" - the most idiotic argumentI'm sorry you had to deal with that... Well, at least I hope he wasn't a completely terrible friend. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 08/01/26 10:43 AM |
| 2 | "You can't know what someone is like romantically if you're just friends with them!" - the most idiotic argument>It’s just a fact that knowing a little about someone is going to be more than knowing nothing about someone And it's still much better than nothing. Moreover, I repeat once again, being friends with someone you will definitely learn more than "a little" | /r/PurplePillDebate | 08/01/26 10:42 AM |
| 5 | "You can't know what someone is like romantically if you're just friends with them!" - the most idiotic argument>Living with someone and having sex with them is MUCH MORE different than just being friends with them. I can agree with this and that is why I specifically highlighted it in my post: ”If you're friends with someone for a long time (really friends, not just acquaintances who say hello once a year), sooner or later you'll have fewer communication restrictions and more sincerity, which provides a huge amount of information at the initial stage compared to dating.” ”This information is usually sign… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 08/01/26 10:39 AM |
| 1 | No way most men are friends with a rapistDon't like it when your obvious trolling fails? Sorry😭 | /r/PurplePillDebate | 08/01/26 10:33 AM |
| 1 | "You can't know what someone is like romantically if you're just friends with them!" - the most idiotic argument>We have a close friend and we never would have guessed he's a mamma's boy when in a relationship And yet somehow you found out... | /r/PurplePillDebate | 08/01/26 10:32 AM |
| 1 | No way most men are friends with a rapistMy husband found out his literal best friend beat the shit out of his wife and cut him off. Neither of us would have ever suspected it, had there not been proof and an arrest record. https://preview.redd.it/s7orfg1xr3cg1.jpeg?width=1388&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=0b6435b36c8e8d45163a616be111a093b1127a45 🥱 | /r/PurplePillDebate | 08/01/26 10:30 AM |
| 2 | No way most men are friends with a rapist… «I'm sorry you were all so naive, or perhaps you simply fell under the influence of a psychopath (who make up 4.5% of the population, and not all of them are genius manipulators).» | /r/PurplePillDebate | 08/01/26 10:26 AM |
| 0 | No way most men are friends with a rapistI'm sorry you were all so naive, or perhaps you simply fell under the influence of a psychopath (who make up 4.5% of the population, and not all of them are genius manipulators). I truly hope you won't have such experiences again🤝 | /r/PurplePillDebate | 08/01/26 10:23 AM |
| 1 | No way most men are friends with a rapistYeah, just like you and your husband have it💅 | /r/PurplePillDebate | 08/01/26 10:09 AM |
| 1 | No way most men are friends with a rapistI already asked you to stop making excuses about skill issues🫶 | /r/PurplePillDebate | 08/01/26 10:05 AM |
| – | No way most men are friends with a rapistStop citing one-in-a-million examples to justify your skill issues. Some people have been struck by lightning seven times, and some have even been struck by meteorites.But this is not a popular topic. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 08/01/26 10:04 AM |
| – | No way most men are friends with a rapistYep, whatever helps you sleep at night bud | /r/PurplePillDebate | 08/01/26 09:57 AM |
| – | No way most men are friends with a rapistNext time, just say that you don't have basic social skills, instead of making up excuses. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 08/01/26 09:52 AM |
| -8 | No way most men are friends with a rapist>Except, you do. My husband found out his literal best friend beat the shit out of his wife and cut him off. Neither of us would have ever suspected it, had there not been proof and an arrest record Nah, you don’t. I, just like you, can pull out personal examples of when a person smelled like shit a mile away, but their partners didn’t see it point-blank. >The fact that so many men truly believe they have some supernatural ability to know everyone in their circle in and out is wild. This isn't a… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 08/01/26 09:47 AM |
| 2 | No way most men are friends with a rapistI'd probably write a post on this topic, but it would obviously be drowned in criticism from "experienced BlueP married people here," who don't understand the most basic things. -That the person they're dating is likely to behave better than usual, even if not out of bad intentions. -Or that lust and in love can cloud people's judgment, and that's natural. -Or that being friends with someone will force you to see them from many different sides, which will give you a wealth of information beyond … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 08/01/26 08:32 AM |
| -9 | No way most men are friends with a rapistRapists are 1% of the population and if you really know a lot of them then... I don't know, I'm sorry | /r/PurplePillDebate | 08/01/26 07:52 AM |
| -6 | No way most men are friends with a rapistThis is the most idiotic argument, because you don't need to know specifically what they're like romantically and sexually when you know what they're like in general(which provides a lot more information, especially when you've known these people for years). At the same time, women (maybe more often younger ones) often make the mistake of saying, "He's fine with me, okay, he's shit with other men... But he's still romantic!", ignoring that yes, he may be good as a partner but overall he's crap, … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 08/01/26 07:47 AM |
| 2 | I think men’s desired # of kids is higher than women’s desired # of kidsI just remember a joke about a woman and a man arguing about which hurt more: a kick in the balls or childbirth. -"I think a kick in the balls hurts a lot more." -"But that's not true; childbirth causes a lot more problems!" -"Well, I've heard women ask about the baby. But I've never heard a man beg someone to kick him in the balls harder." | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/01/26 02:44 PM |
| 1 | Most assholes dont admit theyre assholes. They typically have a victim complex.They just commit less felonies It literally makes them better. It’s funny how they believe committing less felonies and not cheating doesn’t exempt you from being a piece of shit Then they are «piece of shit» who are much better than more dangerous «piece of shit» You’re not getting trophies just because you’re less dangerous than the other asshole (and even then, thats not always true). But there has to be a reward; that's how our society functioned for thousands of years, right up until the be… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/01/26 02:36 PM |
| 55 | Some people are not meant to find a partnerThe modern dating scene is completely removed from "natural selection." Ultimately, "natural selection" has been completely disrupted by globalization and the increasing population. The destruction of small local communities has also been greatly harmed by the decline in third-place positions and the diminishing influence of the institution of reputation. For a very long time, it was primarily what kind of person you were (whether you were kind, whether you did your job, whether you showed empat… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 05/01/26 08:47 PM |
| 1 | N COUNTS WEEKLY DISCUSSION THREADThese women specifically don't want these super-attractive men on a permanent basis, but are instead seeking a more submissive man to manipulate. I've seen this from the outside and almost fell victim to such a woman myself. Again, I wrote that I not only witnessed similar situations from the outside (which is already enough), but I've also been in one myself. Again, you need to read what you're responding to. And also, stop devaluing other people's experiences, but that's too much to ask. So, h… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 05/01/26 06:33 PM |
| 1 | N COUNTS WEEKLY DISCUSSION THREAD>>And to be a promiscuous woman, you don't have to be attractive, unlike a promiscuous man, so there is no connection at all. >Here what I originally wrote, which anticipated your comment. >And there were other people there who clarified that being in demand for sex and for a relationship are different things. Read what you comment next time. >Do red pillers want to look bad? Is that’s what’s happening? It's hard to look worse than your attempts at trolling. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 05/01/26 06:30 PM |
| 1 | N COUNTS WEEKLY DISCUSSION THREADIt's physically impossible to be aggressive, either actively or passively, when you're insecure. Here's my comment again. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 05/01/26 06:28 PM |
| 1 | N COUNTS WEEKLY DISCUSSION THREAD>I said the dudes are afraid of scenario that will never happen. And I literally listed two very real, non-fictional scenarios, each of which I witnessed with my own eyes. Like many millions of people, I've also seen similar situations. Stop lying and ignoring other people's experiences. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 05/01/26 05:55 PM |
| 1 | N COUNTS WEEKLY DISCUSSION THREAD<image> For some reason, no one else has had the same reading problems as you. That's your problem. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 05/01/26 05:54 PM |
| 1 | N COUNTS WEEKLY DISCUSSION THREADIt's physically impossible to be aggressive, either actively or passively, when you're insecure. But if someone is confident or perhaps overly confident, they can be aggressive. Here's my comment again. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 05/01/26 05:53 PM |
| -1 | N COUNTS WEEKLY DISCUSSION THREAD>And to be a promiscuous woman, you don't have to be attractive, unlike a promiscuous man, so there is no connection at all. Here's what I originally wrote, which anticipated your comment. And there were other people there who clarified that being in demand for sex and for a relationship are different things. Read what you comment next time. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 05/01/26 05:46 PM |
| 2 | N COUNTS WEEKLY DISCUSSION THREADYou literally said that the situations I mentioned are lies and fantasy. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 05/01/26 05:43 PM |
| 1 | N COUNTS WEEKLY DISCUSSION THREAD>Do you understand what words mean? Unfortunately, you didn't, because you replied without reading my entire comment. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 05/01/26 05:42 PM |
| 3 | N COUNTS WEEKLY DISCUSSION THREADWhat I mean is that their partner is hiding information about their past from them so they can't leave. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 05/01/26 05:41 PM |
| 1 | N COUNTS WEEKLY DISCUSSION THREAD>In other words, looks account for far, far more of desirability scores than n count does. N count is a minor tie breaker, all else being equal. And that's literally what I said. But your material is interesting, thank you. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 05/01/26 05:40 PM |
| 1 | N COUNTS WEEKLY DISCUSSION THREADAre you really going to deny that more men want casual sex than women? Or that men, on average, have lower standards for women? I see... | /r/PurplePillDebate | 05/01/26 05:38 PM |
| 1 | N COUNTS WEEKLY DISCUSSION THREAD>That doesn’t make them “non toxic” it makes them “toxic but too spineless to do anything” So they're not aggressive. Thanks for confirming. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 05/01/26 05:37 PM |
| 1 | N COUNTS WEEKLY DISCUSSION THREAD>So we just making shit up to be afraid It's you who does it😣 | /r/PurplePillDebate | 05/01/26 05:36 PM |
| – | N COUNTS WEEKLY DISCUSSION THREADWhere does this copium that all promiscuous women are in high demand among men come from? As if attractive women and men are in demand. And to be a promiscuous woman, you don't have to be attractive, unlike a promiscuous man, so there is no connection at all. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 05/01/26 10:44 AM |
| 0 | N COUNTS WEEKLY DISCUSSION THREAD>Why do losers keep acting like shy = non toxic? It's physically impossible to be aggressive, either actively or passively, when you're insecure. But if someone is confident or perhaps overly confident, they can be aggressive. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 05/01/26 10:39 AM |
| 4 | N COUNTS WEEKLY DISCUSSION THREAD>Why would a girl that pulls dudes she want ever get with shy boys when they’ve proven they can get whoever they want. two options, but there may be more. 1) These women can't get these super-attractive men on a permanent basis, for one reason or another. 2) These women specifically don't want these super-attractive men on a permanent basis, but are instead seeking a more submissive man to manipulate. I've seen this from the outside and almost fell victim to such a woman myself. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 05/01/26 10:37 AM |
| 3 | N COUNTS WEEKLY DISCUSSION THREAD>Their partner can leave They can't because their partner is cheating on them and not revealing all the information about their past. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 05/01/26 10:34 AM |
| 1 | Bisexual men represent the biggest share of bluepill men on PPD, yet women overwhelmingly are disgusted by the idea of dating a bisexual man.The OP provided the material. Like it or not, it doesn't matter—if someone writes without automod and says the OP is wrong, then that person is obligated to provide at least some kind of supporting material. That's how discussion works. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 04/01/26 05:13 PM |
| 6 | Bisexual men represent the biggest share of bluepill men on PPD, yet women overwhelmingly are disgusted by the idea of dating a bisexual man.>Also it'll never not be crazy to me how I try to be understanding of others' perspectives and not outright dismiss your experiences just because they're different from my own but here you are saying "nope, the things you've seen never happen". It's rude as fuck lol I was more shocked that someone was claiming that this subreddit is positively biased to RP. So, sorry if that came across as rude. >Go ahead and give the examples. Maybe they'll read my comments and ban me too lol it's probably for … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 04/01/26 04:08 PM |
| 5 | Bisexual men represent the biggest share of bluepill men on PPD, yet women overwhelmingly are disgusted by the idea of dating a bisexual man.>I don't understand why they coddle redpill/blackpill men so hard then This doesn't happen, and they often get banned here. Like most mods here ane Blue , annd often openly mocks men, admitting they're here to troll. I could probably give you a couple of examples, but I'd get banned just like they did before. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 04/01/26 03:34 PM |
| 4 | Bisexual men represent the biggest share of bluepill men on PPD, yet women overwhelmingly are disgusted by the idea of dating a bisexual man.Do you realize you just confirmed what I said?) Although, you only strengthened my argument, because BP is banned here. And the thing is that this is a female RP mod, not a male. Well, as far as I can tell, the RP subreddit is dead. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 04/01/26 03:28 PM |
| 1 | Bisexual men represent the biggest share of bluepill men on PPD, yet women overwhelmingly are disgusted by the idea of dating a bisexual man.You too, except for trying to argue with bad faith. But it's clear you don't like being caught doing it. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 04/01/26 03:26 PM |
| 2 | Bisexual men represent the biggest share of bluepill men on PPD, yet women overwhelmingly are disgusted by the idea of dating a bisexual man.You didn't provide anything either) | /r/PurplePillDebate | 04/01/26 03:16 PM |
| 3 | Bisexual men represent the biggest share of bluepill men on PPD, yet women overwhelmingly are disgusted by the idea of dating a bisexual man.You're on a subreddit where there aren't even any RP mods, even more so, there are no BlackP mods, and all related topics are blocked. You're also on a subreddit where all controversial topics are banned to avoid problems with Reddit moderation. You're also on a subreddit where there are people in the moderation who openly bully men here and admit to it, while blocking everyone they don't like. Are we on the same subreddit? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 04/01/26 03:13 PM |
| 5 | Bisexual men represent the biggest share of bluepill men on PPD, yet women overwhelmingly are disgusted by the idea of dating a bisexual man.I suspect that a man who's been married to another man for about 10 years will have a slightly different experience than a straight heterosexual. Just like the experience of someone who's in past had hundreds of partners, this is also an extreme level of experience that statistically isn't very positive, even for women, not just "insecure men." | /r/PurplePillDebate | 04/01/26 06:54 AM |
| -3 | Bisexual men represent the biggest share of bluepill men on PPD, yet women overwhelmingly are disgusted by the idea of dating a bisexual man.He has the material in his post, if you don't like it, then it's your problem to prove him wrong, lol | /r/PurplePillDebate | 04/01/26 06:44 AM |
| 6 | Bisexual men represent the biggest share of bluepill men on PPD, yet women overwhelmingly are disgusted by the idea of dating a bisexual man.Yes, to be honest, there are a lot of men here who, moreover, admit to being in long-term relationships with other men, extrapolate their experiences to ordinary heterosexuals. And the same thing with the women here; many of them are either a minority (asexuals, aromantics, non-monogamous, etc.). Or they also role-play "I'm married to a gigachad and came here to troll stupid men," while constantly getting confused about their life stories or even sometimes forgetting where they are, and dropping… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 04/01/26 06:42 AM |
| -8 | Bisexual men represent the biggest share of bluepill men on PPD, yet women overwhelmingly are disgusted by the idea of dating a bisexual man.It was you who responded to him here and not under the automod, so it is you who should provide counter material for the discussion lol | /r/PurplePillDebate | 04/01/26 06:34 AM |
| 0 | LVM saying they prefer non-virgins but yet claiming to be “secure” is counterintuitive.OP, there are just so many supposedly "successful and confident people" here who have attacked you, while they themselves are role-playing (while being online 24/7). Things are so bad in their lives that the only thing they can do is try to attack men online. Ignore them and happy holidays to you and your family! | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/12/25 12:52 PM |
| 2 | If you don't want to be exclusivity with a person, then you don't really like them.I hope so🫶 | /r/PurplePillDebate | 24/12/25 12:58 PM |
| 2 | N COUNTS WEEKLY DISCUSSION THREADI mean, if a couple doesn't have initial compatibility and chemistry, then it doesn't matter how much they develop their skills, it won't help much. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 24/12/25 12:52 PM |
| 5 | DISCUSSION🗨️ ABOUT MAIN PPD POSTS📮, LOOKS👀, AND N-COUNT🔢 ARE RESTRICTED🚫 FROM THE DAILY🌞 MEGATHREAD🧵Happy holidays everyone! Give yourself a break and relax before the New Year🎄🎉 | /r/PurplePillDebate | 24/12/25 12:50 PM |
| 1 | If you don't want to be exclusivity with a person, then you don't really like them.I also hope that things will be good for you with your husband, son, etc. So that everything will be good for you and the other queens here who spend 24/7 here constantly trashing men because they are so happy in their relationships💅 | /r/PurplePillDebate | 24/12/25 12:47 PM |
| 4 | N COUNTS WEEKLY DISCUSSION THREADThat's right, I'm just saying that skills are what comes later. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 24/12/25 12:42 PM |
| 3 | N COUNTS WEEKLY DISCUSSION THREADYou understand that you're not contradicting me in any way, right? Or are you seriously going to tell me that individual compatibility doesn't matter? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 24/12/25 12:41 PM |
| 1 | If you don't want to be exclusivity with a person, then you don't really like them.More roleplay, show it more) | /r/PurplePillDebate | 24/12/25 12:39 PM |
| 1 | If you don't want to be exclusivity with a person, then you don't really like them.Keep roleplaying, honey, you've been caught doing it before😍 | /r/PurplePillDebate | 24/12/25 12:39 PM |
| 1 | If you don't want to be exclusivity with a person, then you don't really like them.And it's funny that you've already been caught out for just role-playing and troll, like many women here, so be careful next time | /r/PurplePillDebate | 24/12/25 11:45 AM |
| 3 | So many women are married to gay men and they don't realize itTo be honest, I even knew a gay man who married a woman to allay his family's suspicions. But I don't quite understand what this post is about... | /r/PurplePillDebate | 24/12/25 11:34 AM |
| 4 | N COUNTS WEEKLY DISCUSSION THREADWhenever I see supposedly "experienced people" claiming to "just get better at sex," I realize they've never had sex or a relationship. Because they don't understand two basic things: 1) You're either inherently compatible with your partner or you're not. And you can only "improve" if you're already compatible. 2) If you have to "compete" for your partner's attention with other people, you've already lost the game, lol. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 24/12/25 11:27 AM |
| 1 | If you don't want to be exclusivity with a person, then you don't really like them.Yeah, keep playing the role of an experienced family woman while still missing the most basic things. That'll definitely show how experienced you are, lol. There have been quite a few women here already role-playing "experienced women dating Chads," so you're not the last one here. And try to be a little less obvious next time when there are over 50 people who agree with me, I responded to every comment and the comments of those who disagree are downvoted... | /r/PurplePillDebate | 24/12/25 11:24 AM |
| 1 | If you don't want to be exclusivity with a person, then you don't really like them.Oh, I'm not going to play that game. As soon as I do it, it'll be like, "Oh, but that's not the right post/subreddit/there are people there who say it's not cheating, etc." I already realized you're a troll, "one who's been in a relationship for 17 years" and doesn't understand the most basic things about communicating with a partner lol. You can go fantasize about your "dating experience" somewhere else; no one will believe you here. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 24/12/25 07:38 AM |
| 1 | If you don't want to be exclusivity with a person, then you don't really like them.Right now, they're in it. And now I can tell for sure that you're either a liar or a troll, because otherwise you wouldn't be asking questions like, "How can I find out information about my potential partner??" Lol. I know schoolchildren without experience who wouldn't ask such questions. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 24/12/25 07:27 AM |
| 1 | If you don't want to be exclusivity with a person, then you don't really like them.>That's what people assume. In practice, people have their own expectations and practices. That's why dating subs are filled with monogamous people asking infinite variations on "Is it cheating if...?" and "Is it inappropriate to...?", sparking widespread debate You understand that this works against you here and means that there are discussions that people consider this cheating?... >No, there are innumerable possible reasons not to want a serious relationship with someone independent of intere… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 23/12/25 09:39 PM |
| 2 | If you don't want to be exclusivity with a person, then you don't really like them.Are you reading the same posts I am because I’m not seeing any call the behavior you’ve described as cheating. Yeah, there are accusations of adultery and manipulation. I agree that it shows lack of interest in committing to forming a relationship with the person. and it's literally in the title of my post, lol so I don't understand why you're so desperate to justify toxic people who waste their time and the time of others | /r/PurplePillDebate | 23/12/25 09:31 PM |
| 1 | If you don't want to be exclusivity with a person, then you don't really like them.I can honestly say this about you because you're either inexperienced or genuinely non-monogamous. It must be embarrassing when you're completely uninterested in your potential partner's life, lol. There is nothing difficult in getting to know another person better if you are interested in them, but yes, that is only if you are interested in them lmao There I don’t know... Find out the principles of life, hobbies, past background... It’s not that difficult... So if you don’t understand it, then … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 23/12/25 09:29 PM |
| 1 | If you don't want to be exclusivity with a person, then you don't really like them.>Even two monogamous people often don't have the same set of assumptions for exactly what monogamy entails No, monogamy has a clear definition that is quite well known. >Nothing in your post explained that they were doing it secretly, nor that the purpose of the secrecy is to keep the other person from leaving. You're only adding this context now. We all have problems with reading and understanding sometimes, it's normal. >No, they just don't want a monogamous relationship with this particular p… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 23/12/25 09:27 PM |
| 1 | If you don't want to be exclusivity with a person, then you don't really like them.You have eyes and ears. Maybe even shared circles of friends or something. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 23/12/25 09:16 PM |
| 1 | If you don't want to be exclusivity with a person, then you don't really like them.>Logically, some individuals have to belong to the minority. Yep, and they are still a minority, which doesn't affect the overall picture that much. >Anyway, google "Law of Small Numbers." I actually did some research on this and all I found was that relying on a small sample size of anything leads to hasty conclusions. Unlike the law of large numbers. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 23/12/25 09:15 PM |
| 1 | If you don't want to be exclusivity with a person, then you don't really like them.You didn't answer that because I wrote, "Why didn't they let me know they were exclusive? They don't see anyone else and work entirely as a partner." | /r/PurplePillDebate | 23/12/25 08:58 PM |
| 1 | If you don't want to be exclusivity with a person, then you don't really like them.Yeah, because it was clear that if you like someone, you won't fuck other people. And the same thing happened here: neither she nor I were seeing anyone else and didn't hide it. That's the thing: when you're monogamous and have found someone you're truly interested in, even those who multi-date still say they'll cut off all other connections even without "exclusivity," because you're interested in THIS PERSON. And we "discussed" our status when she wanted to update her social media page to tag m… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 23/12/25 08:55 PM |
| 2 | If you don't want to be exclusivity with a person, then you don't really like them.Go make a post on any relationship subreddit describing a man and women who are doing all of the activities you’ve described - going on dates, meeting family, having sex…but no official title of boyfriend & girlfriend and see what the response will be. I would guarantee the vast majority would say it is not cheating. Such posts already exist, and you can refer to them. And some people there say this is terrible behavior and cheating/a sign of lack of interest, while others say yes, it's not chea… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 23/12/25 08:48 PM |
| 0 | If you don't want to be exclusivity with a person, then you don't really like them.Again, it doesn't matter when the vast majority of the population is monogamous. Especially since if the person you're dating goes out with other people, that's a sure sign of little interest. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 23/12/25 07:49 PM |
| 1 | If you don't want to be exclusivity with a person, then you don't really like them.OR, don't make assumptions if you care that much. That's exactly why if you're non-monogamous, you need to be open here and look for the same kind of people. Have you ever even had a relationship? Yep in past and even now And those women there wouldn't have liked it if I'd gone after other women. Just like I wouldn't have liked the opposite, because we're monogamous and genuinely attached, so we don't really need anyone else. Just like most of the population. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 23/12/25 07:47 PM |
| 1 | If you don't want to be exclusivity with a person, then you don't really like them.When it was really those I liked, then yes, I didn't care about the rest. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 23/12/25 07:41 PM |
| 1 | If you don't want to be exclusivity with a person, then you don't really like them.>Like, you didnt even consider that not everyone even cares about exclusivity, or relationship status. This is a minority of humanity (non-monogamous) or people who are in casual relationships. >So, communicate. If you want a relationship to be defined, then define it. Dont just assume that someone else has silently agreed to your rules on your schedule. Exactly, and since most people are monogamous, it is you, as a non-monogamous person, who should talk about this. >Because you like them. That … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 23/12/25 07:39 PM |
| 1 | If you don't want to be exclusivity with a person, then you don't really like them.I'm absolutely right. If someone you (person A) are dating and your partner (person B) turns around and goes after someone else without explanation, then they don't like you. And for me, it's unclear why person B even pursued person A in this situation if they intended to cheat from the start. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 23/12/25 07:28 PM |
| 1 | If you don't want to be exclusivity with a person, then you don't really like them.My God, there's a real problem here... If you're monogamous, you can only be with one person at a time, and it doesn't matter whether you're single or in a relationship. It's just who you are, and you're only attracted to one person. If you're polygamous, you're attracted to many people at the same time. Nothing complicated. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 23/12/25 07:27 PM |
| 1 | If you don't want to be exclusivity with a person, then you don't really like them.Monogamy is the default state, and no one should assume anything about it. It's the polygamist who must clarify who they are, because they represent a group that is an extreme minority. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 23/12/25 07:27 PM |
| 3 | If you don't want to be exclusivity with a person, then you don't really like them.To be honest, this all sounds like something a polygamist would say. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 23/12/25 07:27 PM |
| 2 | If you don't want to be exclusivity with a person, then you don't really like them.Honestly, I suspect the opposite is true; the rest of the world will disagree with your opinion here. Cheating is bad in any case, and trying to justify it won't make it better. Just as monogamy will always be the default state for the majority of the world's population. Especially since, in any case, if the person you're dating is going out with other people, it's also a signal that they're not interested in you. This is all just showing such lack of experience with how romantic relationships f… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 23/12/25 07:27 PM |
| 1 | If you don't want to be exclusivity with a person, then you don't really like them.And the individual belongs to the majority of humanity. You hardly think you're dating an alien from Mars, just because «You date the individual» | /r/PurplePillDebate | 23/12/25 07:27 PM |
| 0 | If you don't want to be exclusivity with a person, then you don't really like them.No, it's still cheating. And even more so, showing signs that they don't like you, since they're still looking for other people. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 23/12/25 07:27 PM |
| 3 | If you don't want to be exclusivity with a person, then you don't really like them.That monogamy is a fundamental state inherent to most humanity, so if you're polygamous, it's YOU who should speak up. Also, if someone you're dating keeps seeing other people, they're probably not very interested in you. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 23/12/25 07:26 PM |
| 3 | If you don't want to be exclusivity with a person, then you don't really like them.It doesn't matter what exactly is this. What matters is that if they're non-monogamous and you're monogamous, then you're probably not very compatible, and they shouldn't hide their state. But if they don't really love you, then... That's all clear. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 23/12/25 07:26 PM |
| 1 | If you don't want to be exclusivity with a person, then you don't really like them.No, because you probably live on our planet and in one of the large societies who already have established moral guidelines (especially considering that there are intersections in this between religious dogmas) | /r/PurplePillDebate | 23/12/25 05:50 PM |
| 2 | If you don't want to be exclusivity with a person, then you don't really like them.They were completely honest about it, since they don't date other people. Especially since monogamy is the default, since that's who the vast majority of humanity is. You sound like, "Hey, how do you know you're dating a regular person and not a hermaphrodite?" Well, I don't know, probably because hermaphroditism is an extremely rare phenomenon, lol. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 23/12/25 05:48 PM |
| 1 | If you don't want to be exclusivity with a person, then you don't really like them.Monogamy is a state of mind and psyche. Like sexuality in general (like hetero, LGBT+, aromantic, asexual, etc.), you don't choose it; it's who you are. To be monogamous, you don't have to be in a relationship from birth, lol | /r/PurplePillDebate | 23/12/25 05:46 PM |
| 0 | If you don't want to be exclusivity with a person, then you don't really like them.No, you're truly a full partner with someone if you regularly go on dates with them, get to know their social circle, etc. Anything else is simply an attempt to justify your cheating in your own eyes, even though no one else will fall for it and openly see it as cheating and a sign of disinterest in the relationship. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 23/12/25 05:44 PM |
| 2 | If you don't want to be exclusivity with a person, then you don't really like them.Yeah, but what's important is that it's with the majority. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 23/12/25 04:43 PM |
| 1 | If you don't want to be exclusivity with a person, then you don't really like them.They literally fuck other people, which is non-monogamous behavior. While the other person is monogamous lol | /r/PurplePillDebate | 23/12/25 04:42 PM |
| 2 | If you don't want to be exclusivity with a person, then you don't really like them.Um... What? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 23/12/25 04:41 PM |
| 3 | If you don't want to be exclusivity with a person, then you don't really like them.Moral relativism doesn't work in this universe, sorry. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 23/12/25 04:41 PM |
| 1 | If you don't want to be exclusivity with a person, then you don't really like them.>So then you can only really like one person? Romantically yes, but most likely you are monogamous (like the vast majority of the population) | /r/PurplePillDebate | 23/12/25 04:40 PM |
| 5 | If you don't want to be exclusivity with a person, then you don't really like them.>So we're monogamous from birth? Nope, sorry lol Um... Yeah. And we're literally a serially monogamous species, so yeah... If someone wants non-exclusivity or be polygamous, they should ask for it. They aren't entitled to the assumption. If they're too afraid of being rejected, that's their own problem. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 23/12/25 04:39 PM |
| 2 | If you don't want to be exclusivity with a person, then you don't really like them.If they're fucking someone else, then they're probably not as monogamous and exclusive as they say. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 23/12/25 04:37 PM |
| 4 | If you don't want to be exclusivity with a person, then you don't really like them.>So if their partner also isn't bringing up exclusivity, why wouldn't it be fair to assume they're also non-monogamous? Non-monogamy is something that is deeply marginalized. Yet, most societies on earth are monogamous, even those that permit non-monogamy (like how most Muslim marriages are still monogamous). Like it or not, being monogamous is the default setting. Changing that requires a deliberate conversation. I don't feel sorry for people who just cheats on his partners and then tries to hi… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 23/12/25 04:35 PM |
| 3 | If you don't want to be exclusivity with a person, then you don't really like them.Probably yes, when you left the pie out in the sun and open air while eating ice cream | /r/PurplePillDebate | 23/12/25 04:29 PM |
| 2 | If you don't want to be exclusivity with a person, then you don't really like them.For monogamous people, it's one person at a time. And monogamous people make up the vast majority of people on the planet. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 23/12/25 04:28 PM |
| 2 | If you don't want to be exclusivity with a person, then you don't really like them.>Are you actually doing research or arguing based on what you feel dating in the past was like?? I can tell you this, but it is surprising that you do not understand that people do not like being cheated on. >It is possible to use their WORDS and communicate that they want to make the relationship “official”. It’s not logical to assume someone else is on the same page as you during dating or in relationships in general. You know what they say about “assuming” things, right? That's exactly how yo… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 23/12/25 04:27 PM |
| 3 | If you don't want to be exclusivity with a person, then you don't really like them.Also, if the other person don’t wants exclusivity, why aren't they bringing it up? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 23/12/25 04:22 PM |
| 0 | If you don't want to be exclusivity with a person, then you don't really like them.Then they should find non-monogamous partners. But this can of course be difficult when most of humanity is monogamous. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 23/12/25 04:22 PM |
| 1 | If you don't want to be exclusivity with a person, then you don't really like them.Yes, I think so too. Although another reason for this behavior could be that they're polygamous and can't find a partner who's equally polygamous, so they deliberately seek out a monogamist and then don't come out to them. Or they're just serial cheaters... | /r/PurplePillDebate | 23/12/25 04:20 PM |
| 2 | If you don't want to be exclusivity with a person, then you don't really like them.And they're probably not very good people. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 23/12/25 04:18 PM |
| 7 | If you don't want to be exclusivity with a person, then you don't really like them.I suspect the pie won't be happy if you try to mix it with ice cream... | /r/PurplePillDebate | 23/12/25 04:18 PM |
| 2 | If you don't want to be exclusivity with a person, then you don't really like them.Last time I checked, humans are a serially monogamous species.… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 23/12/25 04:17 PM |
| 2 | If you don't want to be exclusivity with a person, then you don't really like them.>Why is the person who wants to be exclusive not asking to be exclusive?? How is that possible? They're not dating anyone else and they're acting like your partner. It's all good and clear. >People will always do what benefits them so the person who is getting the perks of the relationship while not having to be “committed” isn’t going to jeopardize losing the perks of a relationship while still getting to be technically “single” and open to others. I'm actually talking about these people, they'… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 23/12/25 04:15 PM |
| 4 | If you don't want to be exclusivity with a person, then you don't really like them.Yes, I agree with that. Cheaters are never good people, no matter how hard they try to justify themselves. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 23/12/25 04:09 PM |
| -1 | If you don't want to be exclusivity with a person, then you don't really like them.More like: "If you throw pie at the wall and then start eating ice cream, you're probably not very interested in pie." | /r/PurplePillDebate | 23/12/25 04:03 PM |
| 4 | If you don't want to be exclusivity with a person, then you don't really like them.I don't understand this either. Like, come on, if you like someone, why are you cheating on them and not wanting to declare exclusivity? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 23/12/25 04:02 PM |
| 2 | If you don't want to be exclusivity with a person, then you don't really like them.Well, I didn't really understand what you wanted to say... But I agree that these are probably not very good people. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 23/12/25 04:00 PM |
| 1 | If you don't want to be exclusivity with a person, then you don't really like them.No, this post is actually about a topic I've been wanting to write for a long time, and I've had it in drafts. I've always been interested in why people date people they're not interested in. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 23/12/25 03:58 PM |
| 0 | If you don't want to be exclusivity with a person, then you don't really like them.It probably depends on whether the moderators are active, and which ones. But I think it will be removed quickly. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 23/12/25 03:55 PM |
| 1 | If you don't want to be exclusivity with a person, then you don't really like them.Yeah, I guess that's typical for these people. Otherwise, I can't understand why they date people they're supposedly interested in, but then turn them down. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 23/12/25 03:54 PM |
| 6 | If you don't want to be exclusivity with a person, then you don't really like them.So, you're kind of explaining what these people think? Because what you listed sounds like something good people don't do. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 23/12/25 03:53 PM |
| 2 | Women should just cut off any access to intamcy till they get the result they want.Um... Did you answer someone else or do you have problems? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 23/12/25 03:45 PM |
| 1 | Women should just cut off any access to intamcy till they get the result they want.>Clearly no matter what women do somehow we are always choosing bad. A funny attempt to shirk responsibility >Its so bad in fact that are trends of women posting about their amazing situationships. Only for other women to post pictures of dating the same guy at the same time showing that the obvious problem in this equation is just men. If a woman in this situation were to encounter this as an exception, then yes, the man is the problem. But since this is common, then... Women clearly have some … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 23/12/25 03:26 PM |
| 13 | Men have standards by default and criticize women for doing same thing>The problem is men have their own standards, they consider default ones and reasonable just because. They don't want to date fat women, they don't want single mothers. They don't want to date not pretty women So, you yourself write that men don't want to date: fat women (ignoring the fact that fetishes literally exist with millions of fans of all sorts of overweight women, even the most unconventional and unattractive ones; also, women can naturally be slightly heavier, plus weight is something… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 22/12/25 04:47 PM |
| 1 | QFW: Assuming you’re talking to a man who is level headed, genuine, and wants to engage in an honest discussion, how do you respond if he believes that “women have it easier in society nowadays” and in turn, “men face way more discrimination”?>I would tell him show him statistics about rape accusation that are proven false (not just inconclusive) which are tiny. Then tell him that if makes no sense for someone to dedicate so much time and money (lawyers) to being in court, face massive social stigma and likely get accused of lying just to get someone innocent in jail (how does that benefit anyone?). That’s why so few people do it. But also don't forget to show the statistics that only 1% of the population of all men does this. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 22/12/25 10:09 AM |
| 0 | At what age range do you wish women would stay physically and mentally forever?I really don't think those men who aren't particularly fond of older women would have a problem meeting a similarly young woman and growing old together while they're still young. The point is, these men aren't particularly keen on immediately dating women in their 30s, while being isolated from the dating experience of their 20s. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 22/12/25 10:06 AM |
| 6 | Define Leagues for MenPlease don't lie... | /r/PurplePillDebate | 22/12/25 10:03 AM |
| 2 | If Men Possess No Obligations to Care for Their Children, Then They Possess No Rights to Those ChildrenMutual 🤝 | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/12/25 05:07 PM |
| 2 | If Men Possess No Obligations to Care for Their Children, Then They Possess No Rights to Those ChildrenOf course, I'm describing the essence of the problem, because I've already participated in debates about financial abortions before and your post is not about this topic. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/12/25 04:38 PM |
| 5 | How can we reconcile "Don't go out just to meet women." and "Get outside your comfort zone [if you want to meet women]." as dating advice for men?No, please don't lie. Here and in all large women's communities on Reddit, there are constant posts and content aimed at ridiculing and harassing single men (even non-(*ncels). Or, just as often, simply indifference: "Why should I care about men's problems?/It's not a problem." | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/12/25 04:37 PM |
| 4 | If Men Possess No Obligations to Care for Their Children, Then They Possess No Rights to Those ChildrenAnd I don't argue that those who aren't responsible shouldn't have the "right to manage." But that's not the point of financial abortion; that's a completely different debate. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/12/25 04:32 PM |
| 5 | If Men Possess No Obligations to Care for Their Children, Then They Possess No Rights to Those ChildrenNo, it's not. And if you'd looked at the earlier posts on this topic here, you'd understand that. Because, I repeat, men here just want their opinions to be at least a little as important as women's. And so that men also have the opportunity to accept/refuse the role of father, and not just be presented with the fait accompli because "they had sex with this woman, which means they agree to pregnancy." | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/12/25 04:27 PM |
| 2 | Why men still ask women on dates if they don't want to pay?Because otherwise, women won't do it themselves. If a man doesn't ask a woman out on a date, then even if she's interested, she still won't take the initiative, and therefore the burden falls on the man. (And this is my opinion, given that I pay on dates and in principle where I live there is still a small "gesture" that if a woman accepts that a man pays, then she agrees that this is not a friendly date but a romantic) *Although women themselves also invited me on dates So the main problem here… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/12/25 04:23 PM |
| 5 | If Men Possess No Obligations to Care for Their Children, Then They Possess No Rights to Those ChildrenAnd I suspect it's clear that if you don't have responsibilities, you don't have control over the situation... But that's not what the debate about financial abortions is about, so again, you're making a false pretense. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/12/25 04:06 PM |
| 12 | How can we reconcile "Don't go out just to meet women." and "Get outside your comfort zone [if you want to meet women]." as dating advice for men?Because these women have two goals. A) They sincerely don't want these men to succeed. They may also intentionally wish these men ill. There are also quite a few female commenters here who either ask, "Why should we help men?" or openly mock unsuccessful men. B) These women simply don't know how to date women and don't know how to act from a male perspective. This really reminded me of the vibe of a recent comment from women here about, "Men just need to ask if women are in the mood before appro… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/12/25 04:04 PM |
| 6 | If Men Possess No Obligations to Care for Their Children, Then They Possess No Rights to Those ChildrenAnd this is complete nonsense, because, I repeat, they want both parents to have a choice in this matter. If a woman wants to keep the child or doesn't want a child, then she has every opportunity to fulfill her needs. And that's right. But if a man wants a child or doesn't, then his opinion has no bearing on anything. So your post is a completely false argument... | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/12/25 03:48 PM |
| 9 | If Men Possess No Obligations to Care for Their Children, Then They Possess No Rights to Those ChildrenIt's a bit like arguing with a straw man. >It is the woman’s choice to proceed with the pregnancy, this argument goes, so she bears responsibility for any child she conceives. No, both parents must decide. Just because a woman consented to sex or a man did so doesn't mean they consented to the pregnancy. That's a different matter, one that's decided on a case-by-case basis. And the policy of your supporters and opponents of financial abortion is precisely that a woman can make any decision about… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/12/25 11:30 AM |
| 1 | Q4M: Between two identical looking men, who’s going to have the most casual sex: the intro or the extro?Extroversion maybe yes, but being a party goers no It can be useful to be an extrovert, because you can find your niche and be active in it, and even have success there, whether in finding a LTR, or in FWB or something similar. Just like you don't have to be a party fan to have casual sex. I've known a lot of guys who aren't into that, but they're fine with woman. But, you definitely don't need to specifically smoke weed and drink a lot for this (nothing against alcohol, I practice it myself; bu… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/12/25 09:50 AM |
| 2 | Dating apps are a reflection of reality for a majority of people.It's very wise of you not to argue with her, she's a well-known bad faith debater here. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 20/12/25 08:28 AM |
| 7 | Dating apps are a reflection of reality for a majority of people.Yeah, it gives me that David Betham vibe when he interrupted his wife's interview. "We were poor... But your father had a Rolls-Royce!?" | /r/PurplePillDebate | 20/12/25 08:27 AM |
| 1 | Dating apps are a reflection of reality for a majority of people.It's just a lie supposedly based on truth. Even studies say that yes, men overestimate their appearance, but not in the way you want, lol It turned out that the perception of one's own appearance and that of others is similar for men, and how they "overestimate their attractiveness" also works the other way, because they see others as more attractive. So even if a hypothetical man 5/10 thinks that he is 7/10, then when he sees a woman 5/10, he will think that she is 7. And a woman 7, he will thi… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 20/12/25 08:25 AM |
| – | Have you ever been rejected for sleeping with too many men?This is literally how women don't reject men rudely and directly all the time. Ordinary, even somewhat well-mannered men won't tell a woman they rejected her for any reason. So I totally expect to see women who don't understand this and expect men who care about it go - to insult them to their faces. Even more amusing are the women who first filter out such men themselves, and then say, "Oh, well, I haven't seen them, so they don't exist." Like, are you serious? You literally said yourself that … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/12/25 04:38 PM |
| 2 | Women want to be approached depending on the angle they want to own the OPYeah, I definitely see this | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/12/25 06:08 AM |
| 1 | Women want to be approached depending on the angle they want to own the OPNo | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/12/25 07:19 PM |
| 3 | Women want to be approached depending on the angle they want to own the OPThese are literally the same accounts, so you can actually track them without any problems. And yes, it's certainly possible that people are lending their accounts to others for a while, but that's not sincere. And no, no one will give examples, as that's literally against the rules of this place. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/12/25 03:38 PM |
| 2 | Women want to be approached depending on the angle they want to own the OPIt's the responsibility of these people not only to make life easier for others, but also for themselves first and foremost. If there are clear indicators of when someone is interested and who is not, then the number of approaches to uninterested women will decrease. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/12/25 03:35 PM |
| 7 | Women want to be approached depending on the angle they want to own the OPSo, these men will still have to interact directly with these women, and ultimately, they'll still be accused of "not reading the room." Cool | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/12/25 03:33 PM |
| – | “Male loneliness crisis” gets the attention it does because society fears lonely discontented men more than it fears lonely discontented women*femcels And not harass | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/12/25 08:13 PM |
| – | “Male loneliness crisis” gets the attention it does because society fears lonely discontented men more than it fears lonely discontented womenIn the sense that these women's loneliness is completely different from that of these men. I still vividly remember how women from femcel communities would deliberately block men who tried to hit on them. I can certainly understand that some of these men are bad/incompatible, just wanted sex, etc. But it's impossible to say that all of them are like that, so the women here don't want these men, but they can choose (for whatever reason). Single men don't have the opportunity to reject a bunch of … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/12/25 06:34 PM |
| – | “Male loneliness crisis” gets the attention it does because society fears lonely discontented men more than it fears lonely discontented women>This particular penchant of men has a downstream consequence of people being scared that embittered entitled “lonely” men will rage out or become NEETs. Or both! True, but at the same time, these same men won't resort to violence (the vast minority of men do). But, yes, it would be very bad if even some men abandoned their current lifestyle because they saw it wasn't benefiting them. They will often be irreplaceable. >Contrarily, women can be romantically lonely yet still nurture their friendsh… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/12/25 06:21 PM |
| 3 | The Top 10% Illusion: Why Dating Apps Still Suck for Attractive Men (as a 10% user)So, it's good that you didn't bother to appreciate that I went to meet you and agreed with you. Let me repeat, the fact that they are not compatible with you does not make them bad people, whether you like them or not🤷♂️ | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/12/25 03:32 PM |
| 3 | The Top 10% Illusion: Why Dating Apps Still Suck for Attractive Men (as a 10% user)In any case, these men are in a better position than average or unattractive men, even if we argue that women, on average, still have more opportunities (which is probably true). | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/12/25 03:22 PM |
| 4 | The Top 10% Illusion: Why Dating Apps Still Suck for Attractive Men (as a 10% user)The qualities of a good person are universal and known to everyone. If you're saying that finding a compatible man is hard and there are few of them exist, then yes, that's probably true (especially if your tastes, lifestyle, etc. are specific). I just don't like the lie that most men are terrible. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/12/25 03:18 PM |
| 6 | The Top 10% Illusion: Why Dating Apps Still Suck for Attractive Men (as a 10% user)And I'll tell you that you're delusional and that it's neither mathematically nor logically possible for them to be a minority. Just as it's impossible for good women to be a minority. Not being compatible with someone doesn't make them bad. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/12/25 03:07 PM |
| 6 | The Top 10% Illusion: Why Dating Apps Still Suck for Attractive Men (as a 10% user)This is definitely not a minority; they are definitely at least half (if you subtract all the extreme parts). If you're talking about compatible men, then I can agree. Not being compatible doesn't make someone a bad or freak. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/12/25 03:04 PM |
| 12 | The Top 10% Illusion: Why Dating Apps Still Suck for Attractive Men (as a 10% user)It's neither mathematically nor logically impossible that, among the hundreds of options the average woman faces, there wouldn't be at least a minority of worthy men. Or, even more so, compatible men. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/12/25 02:48 PM |
| -1 | Men wouldn't complain about "modern women" or feminism if both sexes were equally attracted to each other>Throughout most of human's existence, and in almost every species, a good chunk of males don't mate. That's just normal. And... It's a myth. The vast majority of humans reproduced in the past, even during the hunter-gatherer era and beyond. Hell, as a species, we've literally maintained and continue to maintain serial monogamy. Under such circumstances, it's impossible for only a minority of males to reproduce. And nothing prevents males from teaming up with each other to displace the "alpha," … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 16/12/25 10:28 PM |
| 1 | I think women should refuse to pay for anything on a dateYeah, because I’m right) But, I’m also agree with this you post | /r/PurplePillDebate | 16/12/25 05:03 PM |
| 0 | I think women should refuse to pay for anything on a dateSo far there are only a bunch of men here (even RP) who actually agree with you, so it’s likely that your idea of “exposing the hypocrisy of men” is not very successful. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 16/12/25 04:57 PM |
| 4 | Men misinterpreted “I choose the bear” because they’re media illiterate or so defensive they chose willful obtusenessAnd I think that you should understand that she will soon be here for 10 years and all her topics of discussion about how men is garbage , have already been discussed a hundred times, but this does not help | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/12/25 06:47 PM |
| 20 | Men misinterpreted “I choose the bear” because they’re media illiterate or so defensive they chose willful obtusenessBecause 99% of your traffic is about how you don't give a damn about men. And now you've finally expressed a sensible point of view and actually shown that you're not entirely biased against men. That's good. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/12/25 05:51 PM |
| 5 | Slut Paradox: Men don’t wanna wife sluts, but are sluts the ladies who genuinely like men?The point is that these particular this women you're talking about are simply... Classy, cool women without any trauma, "daddy issues," or anything like that. They'd be popular with men even if they were virgins. Their promiscuity doesn't make them good partners; rather, it can sometimes even hinder them, since not all men and women engage in casual sex regularly and want someone who has. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/12/25 02:59 PM |
| 1 | Felons and bullies getting alot of sex partners does not mean women in general like assholes.The idea that women are more attracted to "masculine" men or "bad boys" is literally a trope and stereotype that has been firmly entrenched in various cultures since the last century. Moral personality isn't something that directly sells a person in dating; it's just the way it is. Just like sexual and romantic attraction, sociability, and other qualities aren't tied to morality, and the fact that good people can be single and bad people can be in relationships is also a fact. Stop making women … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/12/25 02:01 PM |
| 5 | Looks are not the most important aspect of women, confidence isAnd without in any way downplaying your experience, it's not even close to comparable. Otherwise, there wouldn't be such a huge difference between neurodivergent women and men in the social sphere. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 11/12/25 09:26 PM |
| 2 | Looks are not the most important aspect of women, confidence isThe point is that genuine self-confidence and self-esteem are built on past experience and positive/negative reinforcement. It's the same here: to be confident, you need to have initial success, and to do that, you need to be attractive in one way or another from the start. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 11/12/25 09:23 PM |
| 1 | Women and pick and choose when the universal appropriate places are appropriate for men to approach them.Yeah, because it's the most noticeable form of sarcasm. Yet, there are still people who make the /s mark because not everyone can detect it even in simple things. And so it is with everything; unfortunately, there's not as much universality as even I would like. And you, forgive me if I was rude, but I was actually quite arrogant at the end. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 11/12/25 09:19 PM |
| 1 | Women and pick and choose when the universal appropriate places are appropriate for men to approach them.It's actually good that you realized I being snarky and sarcastic, and it's a good coincidence that you actually right! But with another person, for example, this might not be the case, and their just manner of speech might not be due to them being snarky on purpose. It could also just be their communication style, or trolling, or whatever. It's the same with dating or virtually any type of communication: millions of different methods, tricks, hints, etc., that work or don't work for different p… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 11/12/25 09:10 PM |
| 1 | Women and pick and choose when the universal appropriate places are appropriate for men to approach them.Of course, it's like if you learn to ride a bike, you can also learn to drive a car. Maybe even fly a plane! | /r/PurplePillDebate | 11/12/25 08:54 PM |
| 0 | Women and pick and choose when the universal appropriate places are appropriate for men to approach them.Yeah, sure, it's a practice that's much more complex than riding a bike. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 11/12/25 08:49 PM |
| 2 | Guys overestimate the percentage of men who can get away with being assholes.Yes, I get it We've already had many discussions about nice guys and other moral things, and I already understand that this is doctrine for them. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 11/12/25 08:46 PM |
| 1 | Guys overestimate the percentage of men who can get away with being assholes.So, you're basically trying to insult me from the start, while apparently considering yourself a good person? And considering that I've repeatedly argued with the RP, the cheaters here, against relationship abuse and violence... And some of those arguments were with you... It's a bit ironic, to be honest... | /r/PurplePillDebate | 11/12/25 08:43 PM |
| 11 | "Nice Guys" are basically an urban legendHonestly, this is a bit old, but probably timeless. Anyone trying to spin this "Nice guys are actually terrible monsters" bullshit should read this, but they won't, unfortunatel…. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 11/12/25 08:40 PM |
| 3 | Women and pick and choose when the universal appropriate places are appropriate for men to approach them.This is actually a good example of what I'm saying,a misunderstanding that social dynamics are complex and varied. Thank you. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 11/12/25 08:38 PM |
| – | Guys overestimate the percentage of men who can get away with being assholes.I thought you tried to do that instead of actually responding to my comment. But nothing surprising. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 11/12/25 08:35 PM |
| 2 | "Nice Guys" are basically an urban legendAnd this despite the fact that she literally repeats the same examples simply because that's all she has. She's been practicing necromancy for a long time here, lol | /r/PurplePillDebate | 11/12/25 08:32 PM |
| – | Guys overestimate the percentage of men who can get away with being assholes.This... is a weird comment, to be honest... Are you okay, dude? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 11/12/25 08:26 PM |
| 4 | Women and pick and choose when the universal appropriate places are appropriate for men to approach them.Let me repeat, all these social cues are highly individualized, depending on the groups of people you interact with, and even more so on the individual people within those groups. Therefore, I am extremely suspicious of people who claim it's easy, because they are either genuine social geniuses or liars. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 11/12/25 08:26 PM |
| 6 | Women and pick and choose when the universal appropriate places are appropriate for men to approach them.Rather, I mean that you and the other female commentators don't understand that social dynamics are much more complex and multifaceted than you think. Or your "social skills" aren't as good as you think, if you don't understand this. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 11/12/25 06:52 PM |
| 5 | Women and pick and choose when the universal appropriate places are appropriate for men to approach them.The real answer: body language and boundaries are different for everyone, and what's normal for one girl isn't normal for another. Hell, even one person has a different perception of what's comfortable for them at different times, so even that won't work. Somehow, I get the feeling that people who give advice like you never follow it, otherwise they'd realize things don't work quite that way. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 11/12/25 05:46 PM |
| 7 | Guys overestimate the percentage of men who can get away with being assholes.>I don't think anyone lies to men about this This is literally what is popular with the OP and most of the BP here >And before you tell me your mother or sister told you to just be nice, I have some bad news: your mother and your sister both thought you were fun and sexy (but not in a creepy way). This isn't just something the family says; it's much more than that. Again, even the OP has been posting on this topic for years. >Think it through: who do you probably look like if it's a family? Your… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 11/12/25 05:42 PM |
| 5 | Guys overestimate the percentage of men who can get away with being assholes.Or maybe these men were simply raised by being good people and can't suddenly become terrible people at the snap of a finger. If they could, it would be on the level of psychopathy. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 11/12/25 04:12 PM |
| 15 | Guys overestimate the percentage of men who can get away with being assholes.>These guys need to understand being kind of generically moral does not absolve you of the requirement to be fun and sexy. It would be great if they stopped lying to men about this. But the OP also subscribes to the idea that "men who don't fuck because they hate woman’s ," so nothing will work. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 11/12/25 04:01 PM |
| 9 | Guys overestimate the percentage of men who can get away with being assholes.>Are you not aware people are mot a monolith? If you say, "Well, no one communicates with bad people except for a huge list of people," then everything up to the word "except" is unimportant. >I rest my case. Im glad I dont live in Gotham. I'm glad you live in the My Little Pony world, but even there, problems happen. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 11/12/25 03:59 PM |
| 12 | Guys overestimate the percentage of men who can get away with being assholes.>“I cant get away with being a piece of shit because Im not hot enough for shallow people to want”. I'm glad you recognize that romantic and sexual attractiveness are far more important than a "good personality." Maybe the day will come when you'll stop shitting on men and saying they're "lonely because they hate women." >People generally dont like assholes. Its just there will be people who overlook it for: Contradiction in the two sentences is surprising. >Also, alot of guys overestimate how g… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 11/12/25 03:37 PM |
| 2 | The manosphere doesn’t believe men should be putting effort into relationships.>It seems the goal is really exclusivity when it comes to sex, not an actual relationship. Problem is the majority of women wont be fine with that. Because why be loyal to a person who doesnt give a fuck about you? Exclusivity is literally the core of a monogamous romantic relationship. Without exclusivity, all other components are impossible. >This is also a problem with laziness and not actually liking women, because thinking hanging out with someone frequently is effort enough is sad because … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 08/12/25 03:29 PM |
| 1 | Even if a large group of men didn't truly had sex it wouldn't lead to a revolution or an apocalypseI actually even made a post about this once so I've been thinking about it a little bit. Here | /r/PurplePillDebate | 07/12/25 07:11 AM |
| 9 | Even if a large group of men didn't truly had sex it wouldn't lead to a revolution or an apocalypseIt's absolutely not easy and is only possible in cooperation with other people It's a well-known phenomenon, for example, that after masturbation, people experience an even worsening of their mental state. And no, it's not due to religion or upbringing. Our bodies/brains aren't such idiots and can easily recognize when they're being deceived in insincere ways. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/12/25 07:49 PM |
| 23 | Even if a large group of men didn't truly had sex it wouldn't lead to a revolution or an apocalypseHistorians have found that young, single men are the most proactive and pro-revolutionary group. Some of the most high-profile events of the last century, triggered by them, were the revolution in the Russian Empire and the Islamic revolution. Now, I honestly don't think that romantically single men are particularly dangerous (in fact, studies show they are significantly less dangerous to women, but that's beside the point). Especially since many of these single men have families and close femal… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/12/25 07:33 PM |
| 1 | Avoidant men will claim they were cheated on when they didn’t even define the relationship.What a concentration of lies, even after the quotes | /r/PurplePillDebate | 04/12/25 08:18 PM |
| 1 | Avoidant men will claim they were cheated on when they didn’t even define the relationship.Quote them. «Technically, every interaction of 2 people who know each other is a part of their relationship. Just because you did not shake hands on a label, does not mean feelings can't be hurt.» «Silly men, women don't cheat, the relationship was all in your head. Lmao» «oh I agree situationships are stupid. in the past the label was put in by default as "exclusive" and you dating/having sex with someone else was considered cheating. Of course people (both men and women) still did it, but it w… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 04/12/25 07:59 PM |
| 2 | Avoidant men will claim they were cheated on when they didn’t even define the relationship.It wasn't a relationship. You can't cheated on without a relationship. Here, dozens of people besides me have already said that it was a relationship. would understand trying to keep being avoidant and have situationships is a dick move. Men here dont understand that because they only think about their feelings. The reason guys are arguing against establishing a relationship because you guys want it both way. You want boyfriend treatment without the expectations of a boyfriend. Do you realize yo… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 04/12/25 07:38 PM |
| 2 | Avoidant men will claim they were cheated on when they didn’t even define the relationship.Then why the fuck men complaining about being dumped by women who give below average treatment? :-) Probably because he was still cheated on in a relationship he invested in. You know... Someone with empathy would understand that. Also, that didn't show I said it was a noble reason. YOU BELIEVE it's a noble reason. Do you understand what literally means? You literally said that this is a scientifically proven fact, why the hell are you lying so blatantly? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 04/12/25 07:28 PM |
| 3 | Avoidant men will claim they were cheated on when they didn’t even define the relationship.>Expecting women to tolerable below average treatment is precisely why he's alone now and constantly heartbroken.. Expecting men to tolerable below average treatment is precisely why anyone would call such a woman a cheater >Where? <image> in your very first comment, lol | /r/PurplePillDebate | 04/12/25 04:01 PM |
| 3 | Avoidant men will claim they were cheated on when they didn’t even define the relationship.>He didn't say they were, so how? Yes, since they had been dating for months >So he was a manipulative and you expect people to give him sympathy? So you can no longer say that he didn't do anything and didn't pay attention to her. Although I don't believe he was manipulative, it seems quite the opposite, since he was heartbroken. >No one said that. YOU THINK it's a noble reason. You literally stated it as a fact, remember? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 04/12/25 03:43 PM |
| 4 | Avoidant men will claim they were cheated on when they didn’t even define the relationship.>Not they werent Yes, they were in a relationship >Doing the bare minimum for a couple of months is not effort. Youre suppose to keep putting in effort Then she didn't even do the bare minimum >That doesnt mean love. In fact, it’s commonly a manipulation tactic. But now you don't say that he did anything. >Then make it a relationship, not a situationship. Of course he did it and she cheated. >Insulting me doesnt change that facts dont care about your feelings. That's exactly it, facts don't care… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 04/12/25 03:21 PM |
| 4 | Avoidant men will claim they were cheated on when they didn’t even define the relationship.God, this is seriously funny, I don't believe you're seriously justifying cheating. >You have to be in a relationship to cheat. Yeah, and they were in a relationship, these women just want to justify themselves >Relationships require constant effort. Otherwise, you're better off being casual friends, which I said he was good at. Yeah, and they were, because as you yourself wrote, he also love bombed them. >That's what he did and it backfired on him. It seems he didn't cheat on any of these women… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 04/12/25 02:28 PM |
| 3 | Avoidant men will claim they were cheated on when they didn’t even define the relationship.I now think this is deliberate sabotage on your part to paint women in a bad light. Because you'd be hard pressed to find such a blatant justification for cheating. >Also, he brought up “all the heart breaks I had makes me take longer to commit and its hard for me to say I love you”. That doesn’t sound appealing to most women. The only social skills he seems to have is when he’s a casual friend and knows how to put effort into the first few months of dating. And from his stories, it made me real… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 04/12/25 02:10 PM |
| 2 | If people have to give you ultimatums for you to listen to them, you just dont value those people.I still vividly remember living with my ex-girlfriend. I'm not lazy, and I was the one doing the housework (cleaning, cooking, etc.), but when something bothered her, she didn't really say anything about it. For example, she really liked to remind her to take out the trash (I had no problem with that) because she didn't like that I took it out at the wrong time (she didn't take into account, for example, that I wanted to throw out the food scraps with all the trash, not separately). Tell me, was… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 04/12/25 06:43 AM |
| 5 | Alot of people arent attractive nor rich enough for the attitude they have.Exactly, I don't argue with that. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 02/12/25 04:52 PM |
| 6 | Alot of people arent attractive nor rich enough for the attitude they have.But being attractive is necessary to become any kind of partner in the first place. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 02/12/25 04:48 PM |
| 12 | Is this a relationship ? (hypothetical)This is a purely sexual relationship, but it doesn't even FWB, as there's no social component. It definitely can't be called a full-fledged romantic relationship. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 02/12/25 09:21 AM |
| 4 | Q4M: What things do you do for your female friends that you don't do for your guy friends?I really do everything she says—for my female friends. But not because they want me to or force me to, but simply because I was raised that way from childhood, according to the "gentleman's code." And I'll also calmly help my male friends carry something heavy, etc., if I see (even without a direct request from them) that it might be important. But what I've really noticed is the difference in communication between men and men. Men have less of that special "tenderness" among themselves, and bec… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 02/12/25 09:17 AM |
| 6 | Alot of people arent attractive nor rich enough for the attitude they have.>When people say “Youre alone because youre an asshole” they mean “you have given no reason for people to tolerate your presence”. That's right, and it means that these qualities are important, not personality. It's like a car: it has key parts without which it won't run (engine, transmission, body, steering column, etc.) and additional elements (good sound insulation, heated seats, Bose audio system). So, when you say, "You're alone because you're an asshole," you're also saying, "Your heated s… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 02/12/25 05:56 AM |
| – | Are looks the deciding factor in how much effort a man puts into a woman? If not, what is?What I see is that everything depends on her attitude toward the man and her personality. Simply because men have a lower arousal threshold than women, and it's realistic for the average woman to arouse a man just as much as an attractive woman. Sure, there are some men who have very high standards or prefer certain types of women, but we're still talking about averages, not exceptions. And what specifically is important in a woman's personality... I think what really attracts attention is genui… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/12/25 09:34 PM |
| 1 | CMV: There are no laws or regulations in the civilised world that discriminate against women - but many that discriminate against men.Of course, Ukraine (a post-Soviet country, meaning with an initially pro-feminist partially legal framework),following a "leftist" agenda (which is why she is now in trouble with the Trump administration) and having ratified, for example, the Istanbul Convention - sounds exactly like Afghanistan and Saudi Arabia, lol | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/12/25 09:26 PM |
| 1 | Chasing validation from society and conforming to arbitrary standards at the expense of your own peace will leave you forever unsatisfied and scarred.Find peace in just being with yourself, and fuck what others have to say. Don’t let the ability to sleep with women or make money define your self worth. Those are good things to have, but your merit as a man isn’t dependent on these criteria. Any person who tries to prescribe you a certain set of rules by which to live your life is a cunt who can go die in a ditch. Any man who shames you for not being rich is a douchebag. Any woman who shames your height is an asshat; learn to ignore them and t… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/12/25 12:38 PM |
| 2 | Claiming "Sex isn't the only thing men care about" only works when men show they have other priorities.It changes, especially considering that you didn't read my comment and missed this. «No one will mind if the person they're with doesn't have sex with them immediately, but does other things that confirm their sexual attraction (which, again, is the objective basis of relationships).» «Flirting, sincere compliments, and perhaps foreplay in some cases.» «And, of course, actions that demonstrate romantic affection. It's not for nothing that they still say, "The way to a man's heart is through his … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 30/11/25 04:59 PM |
| 4 | The lesbian divorce rate debunks a lot of the complaints wives have about their husbandsYes, and absolutely necessary to add statistics on domestic violence and how widespread it is among lesbians. And, yes, it's not "poor lesbians are subjected to violence by men." No, 2/3 of abusers in this type of relationships are women. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 30/11/25 04:57 PM |
| 2 | Claiming "Sex isn't the only thing men care about" only works when men show they have other priorities.But sex and intimacy are not only PiV… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 30/11/25 04:54 PM |
| 3 | Claiming "Sex isn't the only thing men care about" only works when men show they have other priorities.A common comeback I see is "Sex is just very important, not the only thing that matters". That is a distinction without a difference when you treat sex as such a high priority as an expense to everything else. Sex is the core of any romantic relationship. Statistically, asexuals make up 1% of the population, so if sex isn't that important to you, that's great. But you're a TOTAL minority. "If a woman doesn't fuck me as soon as possible, then she doesn't find me attractive and I'm wasting my time… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 30/11/25 04:20 PM |
| 8 | N COUNTS WEEKLY DISCUSSION THREADI'm really confused by how some women manage to combine two opposing thoughts in their heads: "Just because we slept with a guy doesn't mean we're sexually attracted to him. Even if we did it quickly, maybe even repeatedly!" And... "Women are significantly less interested in casual sex and also need more security, so if we want to sleep with someone, it has to be someone special." I don't know how these two things can exist simultaneously for the same women. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 28/11/25 09:38 PM |
| 1 | Female sexuality is the ONE human impulse where society collectively pretends that the instinctive preferences are perfectly optimal.I agree that this makes no sense here. Because it was a stupid attempt of you to troll without reading a single comment on the debate you try got involved in. I said what I had to say. Take care. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 28/11/25 06:29 PM |
| 2 | Female sexuality is the ONE human impulse where society collectively pretends that the instinctive preferences are perfectly optimal.Or should you be the one making up fanfics that have no basis in reality? Well, I don't need a woman who blindly believes in this, so either way, it's a win. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 28/11/25 06:23 PM |
| 2 | Female sexuality is the ONE human impulse where society collectively pretends that the instinctive preferences are perfectly optimal.Of course, my mind is closed to stupid and unfounded ideas. We need to maintain information hygiene for ourselves. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 28/11/25 06:20 PM |
| 3 | “Nice Guys Finish Last” comes from not evolving one’s understanding of people and morals from childhood.Exactly, I agree with that. So, by the OP's definition, good people literally don't exist in principle. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 28/11/25 06:07 PM |
| 1 | “Nice Guys Finish Last” comes from not evolving one’s understanding of people and morals from childhood.>There’s nothing really more to discuss if you truly believe that there are no women whatsoever that would kick out a person of their social circle because she or he is an asshole. There’s nothing really more to discuss if you don't read what I write to you ”They often do, and quite consciously, because those people have "redeeming qualities" that aren't tied to their morality.do. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 28/11/25 05:05 PM |
| 7 | “Nice Guys Finish Last” comes from not evolving one’s understanding of people and morals from childhood.>You stay around people who pieces of shit to you? I'm not a woman. They often do, and quite consciously, because those people have "redeeming qualities" that aren't tied to their morality.do. >You’re not going to do well with people if you’re an unlikable prick. A complete lie. You even mentioned in your post that such people could very well be manipulative and hide it. And that's not even mentioning the masses of people who don't fall for the tricks but consciously follow them. >Stating facts … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 28/11/25 02:57 PM |
| 18 | “Nice Guys Finish Last” comes from not evolving one’s understanding of people and morals from childhood.>This normally wouldn’t be a problem if we’re only talking about children since children don’t have the mental capacity of understanding complex things and it’s a good foundation for them. It becomes a problem when someone’s understanding of morals is still at a child’s level. Thats how we end up with Nice Guys, Of course it's sad, that's how this post turned out. >Hence, the nice guy feels robbed and lied to when they see bad misbehaving boys get “rewarded” with what the nice guy always wanted:… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 28/11/25 01:23 PM |
| 19 | A lot of men need to stop giving a shit about the opinions of strangers and internet discourseThe point is that these particular assholes aren't condemned as harshly. Asshole men are discussed and judged, while women who do the same aren't. Communities of women spewing such things, even on the "misogynistic" Reddit, reach MILLIONS of members, while male communities of this kind are either deeply marginalized or completely destroyed. That's precisely the problem. +These assholes aren't just online, and it's hard to surround yourself with like-minded people. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 28/11/25 12:22 PM |
| 2 | Female sexuality is the ONE human impulse where society collectively pretends that the instinctive preferences are perfectly optimal.Dude, let's literally not talk about moving goalposts and the fact that you didn't ignore my arguments. Here's just one example where I highlighted in red that you didn't read and didn't respond. https://preview.redd.it/e86biwb4ez3g1.jpeg?width=999&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=58b55e15abc502872282246a804c557bc84cd28c P.S. You still disagreed with that guy, and your attempt to stop arguing because you lacked arguments isn't the "victory" you imagine it to be. Well, that's why arguing is pointless when… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 28/11/25 11:14 AM |
| 6 | Female sexuality is the ONE human impulse where society collectively pretends that the instinctive preferences are perfectly optimal.Oligarchy is literally about the power of a few who possess certain "superior" qualities. It's not just a political term. And this clearly intersects with the original concept of patriarchy, which later spread to many European cultures and the cultures of the Near and Middle East, including India. Only a few men, who were family patriarchs, wielded power, while the rest (both men and women) were subordinate to them. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 28/11/25 11:04 AM |
| 2 | Female sexuality is the ONE human impulse where society collectively pretends that the instinctive preferences are perfectly optimal.You still haven't found any argument against this, you're just strawmanning and moving goalposts It's too bad you ignore these arguments and don't see them point-blank, even though many people, not just me, have already presented them to you. But ultimately, there's nothing surprising about someone who has no knowledge of their own. I don't see the point in arguing. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 28/11/25 11:01 AM |
| 3 | Female sexuality is the ONE human impulse where society collectively pretends that the instinctive preferences are perfectly optimal.>Read the definition of patriarchy I think you should probably do this. Or at least ask Chat GPT to do it for you, citing the history of this term. You'll surprisingly discover that there was no mention of "all men ruling over fugitive women," but rather that status (i.e., primarily the father, who is older than the others) was paramount. Although, in some cases, older women could also lead (like in Mongolian culture, where men are often absent, leading women to play equal roles in governance an… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 28/11/25 10:50 AM |
| 3 | Female sexuality is the ONE human impulse where society collectively pretends that the instinctive preferences are perfectly optimal.Of course they can. You can have class divide and gender divide. It's obvious really. No, they can’t, because it’s the class position that comes first, not the gender. It's obvious really. In the same social class, men > women. If you're not being dishonest you have to agree with historical facts. It's good that now you're forced to stop lying and admit that class status is decisive. Advice for the future: try lying less and try to save yourself with Chat GPT. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 28/11/25 10:44 AM |
| 4 | Female sexuality is the ONE human impulse where society collectively pretends that the instinctive preferences are perfectly optimal.>Both can exist at the same time No, they can't. >No, you're just being dishonest. "Slaves existed" doesn't mean women were not seen as inferior to men. You're the dishonest one here. This changes everything and shows that men, even though they didn't receive any bonuses, were still munching hay alongside women. But if a man or woman is more powerful due to their position, then yes, that plays a role. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 28/11/25 10:28 AM |
| 5 | Female sexuality is the ONE human impulse where society collectively pretends that the instinctive preferences are perfectly optimal.>Wrong, patriarchy was a thing on every level for most societies. Women < men, not just on the higher levels I repeat, there were no regalia for being a man. The main thing in this case is class stratification. Just like in the original, ancient meaning of patriarchy, which actually existed for a long time—the power of fathers, that is, older and more powerful men. And if you're a "son" in this situation, then you're in trouble, because you're a "weak" man and should directly obey the patriarch … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 28/11/25 10:26 AM |
| 8 | Female sexuality is the ONE human impulse where society collectively pretends that the instinctive preferences are perfectly optimal.If we're talking about the father being the head (which is also kind of like an oligarchy), then I agree. But that's clearly not what that commentator is saying. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 28/11/25 10:22 AM |
| 10 | Female sexuality is the ONE human impulse where society collectively pretends that the instinctive preferences are perfectly optimal.It's very nice that in your description of the hellish landscape for women in those civilizations (which is, in any case, hugely flawed, but oh well), you missed the fact that in all those cases there was SEVERE class stratification, not gender. Supposedly, slavery was also present there, and I certainly don't think a male slave would have been held in higher esteem than a woman from a noble family. Sorry, this just proves my comment and your ignorance of history. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 28/11/25 10:07 AM |
| 2 | Female sexuality is the ONE human impulse where society collectively pretends that the instinctive preferences are perfectly optimal.>Both can exist simultaneously If we're talking about individual societies (even large ones, like ancient or Muslim ones), and not about entire populations, then yes. But in general, no. Patriarchy wasn't widespread by default, but oligarchy was and remains. >Cmon, don't be dishonest, there is no world where you can say there was equality between genders The men here were in deep shit too. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 28/11/25 10:05 AM |
| 1 | Being a stepdad is legit good strategy for some guysThis is only acceptable if this man also has biological children with this woman (although there may be an exception, such as if the man is infertile or has serious hereditary diseases, in which case it might actually work for them). Some people here simply don't take into account that genetically, having children is still truly important for the MOST of humanity. After all, your biological child not only genetically and phenotypically passes on everything you have, but also directly inherits ev… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 28/11/25 09:58 AM |
| 15 | Female sexuality is the ONE human impulse where society collectively pretends that the instinctive preferences are perfectly optimal.>No, that was for the same reason we buy and sell cattle, because women were not considered as real people Men weren't free for most of history either. Patriarchy is a fiction, oligarchy existed. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 28/11/25 09:41 AM |
| 3 | Men would you use a long term birth control if it was available?No, because I'm still young, and it's a really long-term decision that's unclear how to fully reverse. The same goes for a vasectomy; it's also too invasive. But perhaps if my partner and I were older and already had children, it might be an option. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 27/11/25 07:33 PM |
| – | The reaction to the Danish Deception shows women do hold other women accountable.Yeah, same thing | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/11/25 10:45 AM |
| 2 | The reaction to the Danish Deception shows women do hold other women accountable.Yeah,I know it | /r/PurplePillDebate | 24/11/25 01:17 PM |
| 3 | The reaction to the Danish Deception shows women do hold other women accountable.For those who have significant problems with empathy and understanding context, there's another tool to use: cause-and-effect reasoning. Since you clearly have problems with empathy, let's try using logic. >Man refuse to hone his social skills? “B-b-b-but he has autism! You cant expect him to actually learn to overcome it!” The point isn't to dismiss "improving social skills," but to understand why some men have these problems and figure out what exactly is causing them (in order to truly addres… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 24/11/25 10:55 AM |
| 1 | Men should NOT be so forthcoming or honest about their intentions despite how much women claim they shouldI'm afraid there are many women who genuinely dislike men and don't bother to offer proper advice, even from their own perspective (with the caveat that it's THEIR perspective, not objective information). But I agree with your last paragraph: women don't really understand other women in the dating context as well as they'd like. They don't pursue men often, so they don't understand what's going on. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 23/11/25 06:29 PM |
| – | Men should NOT be so forthcoming or honest about their intentions despite how much women claim they shouldThose who give men such advice to "be honest" are simply deliberately trying to sabotage these men from the start. They're dishonest and don't even have women's best interests at heart; no, it's pure hatred of men or extreme naivety. Otherwise, they'd understand that even women who desire greater frankness would still be far more receptive to a man behaving with them more evasively and with at least some formality. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 23/11/25 06:03 PM |
| 1 | Too many guys let normal experiences become their whole personality and stunt their growth.It's good that you still haven't read my entire comment and haven't bothered to understand it. Nothing new, considering that even in your last thread, there were people who saw that you didn't respond to my and other comments in good faith. But that's common. The vast majority of humanity reacts to both positive and negative experiences in life, and if a child is constantly thrown on the floor and scratched, then the child probably won't be okay. >Love that you deliberately ignored the the link … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 23/11/25 05:58 PM |
| 2 | Too many guys let normal experiences become their whole personality and stunt their growth.>Prove that Im giving off that sentiment? <image> >Even other guys dont agree with you. Probably not, because even my comments got more likes than your post. So at least there are a couple of people who agree, and it's not just some dude from TikTok 🤷♂️ | /r/PurplePillDebate | 23/11/25 05:48 PM |
| 6 | Too many guys let normal experiences become their whole personality and stunt their growth."I don't understand that positive and negative feedback have a direct impact on anyone's life experience." Same energy. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 23/11/25 05:40 PM |
| 1 | Too many guys let normal experiences become their whole personality and stunt their growth.And yet, the population group most affected by violence of virtually all kinds in the world is men. Men commit more suicides. Men are more homeless. Men are more likely to die in the workplace. And I could go on. It's a shame that you and the OP lack the basic empathy that even some animals possess. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 23/11/25 03:39 PM |
| 7 | Too many guys let normal experiences become their whole personality and stunt their growth.>“Why are just calling out just men?” I'll answer the question in advance. Because you hate men. >Guys who got teased in highschool and still thinking about it going into their 30s. Unless literal crimes were committed, youre not special for being bullied. Its a common thing. Stop acting like its your tragic backstory. You understand, right, that the very essence of bullying is that one person or a minority is singled out and oppressed in some way by the rest of the group? So no, this isn't a un… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 23/11/25 03:35 PM |
| – | Where does this idea that looks don't matter really come from?>I want someone attractive TO ME! To ME! To ME!! What I find attractive and what other women find attractive is different. I don’t think any of my friends’ partners is attractive, except for one. >There have been so many studies showing the diversity of female attraction and yet you guys still hold on to the outdated information. It’s so frustrating. This shit really needs to die. The fact that there are different types of attractiveness doesn't change the fact that some are significantly more s… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 23/11/25 08:11 AM |
| 0 | The narrative that small age gaps (like 18 & 24) are "predatory" is a recent moral panic based on flawed arguments.>relationship/dating experience is infinitely more important in relationships than generic life experience (like having worked a 9-5 for a few years Exactly, yes, I agree with every word. This always made me laugh, too, because people often completely ignore social context and the fact that someone's abilities are isolated and may not have a permanent effect on other aspects. Like, yes, even if someone is a "functional adult" but inexperienced in romance and sex, that doesn't mean they'll someho… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 23/11/25 07:47 AM |
| 1 | Its not “Alpha Fucks Beta Bucks” for women to change their priorities over time.Friend, you shouldn't have wasted your energy on her. She's such a well-known troll here that even the so-called BluePillers are often surprised. Don't take it so seriously. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 23/11/25 07:38 AM |
| 5 | The narrative that small age gaps (like 18 & 24) are "predatory" is a recent moral panic based on flawed arguments.>6. "But the POWER IMBALANCE is immoral!" This is actually my favorite argument, because people who use it are completely okay with late bloomer men getting into relationships with more experienced women their age. Which obviously has a huge imbalance of power and experience. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 22/11/25 04:18 PM |
| 3 | Men being the ones to initiate is not a failure of feminismNo, actually, they should. Many things in the world are linked to the concept of justice, and romantic relationships are definitely one of them. For example, if someone is in a relationship with someone else, and their partner clearly treats them less positively than others, should they demand equal treatment? No, because that would be counterproductive. But at the same time, it's a clear indicator that their partner doesn't value them, so they can make the choice they want (leaving them, trying… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 22/11/25 06:45 AM |
| 7 | Men being the ones to initiate is not a failure of feminism>Feminism is about liberating women from sex-based oppression, not equality. It does not necessitate the dissolution of gender roles, so there's no hypocrisy. Then it's good that you acknowledge that this isn't about equality, but about women gaining advantages. That's good and fair, but still hypocrisy. >Why would approaching men be our responsibility? For exactly the same reasons why men should adopt some parts of the female gender model >The fact that you're framing this as an "injustice" mea… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/11/25 08:32 PM |
| 3 | Men being the ones to initiate is not a failure of feminismWell, actually, men need to do this just as often. Although I admit that sometimes women actually prefer men with body hair. But, of course, men shouldn't go bald, for example, as this will also reduce their chances. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/11/25 08:23 PM |
| 2 | Men being the ones to initiate is not a failure of feminismI actually think these restrictions are pretty stupid, as they prevent those who genuinely want to leave Ukraine from doing so. It's like, it hardly makes sense for them to stay in the country, since they could literally be working for Russia and doing all sorts of crap. But at the same time, I see that, while there are technically many restrictions for men, not all of them are strictly enforced. Plenty of men have left Ukraine (even those over 18 or 25), and even those who deserted from the Ukr… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/11/25 07:56 PM |
| 1 | Men being the ones to initiate is not a failure of feminismNo, they can leave if they're under 23 in any case. Although it's certainly odd that the Ukrainian government did this after introducing a program to streamline the entry of men aged 18-24 into the army through benefits. And yes, I don't think restrictions on men's movement in Ukraine are a good thing, so don't yell at me. And here's a fun fact: I'm a Ukrainian myself, now back in Ukraine, and I'm over 23. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/11/25 07:37 PM |
| 5 | In what situations would you classify a man as a "beta"?That sounds reasonable. It's pretty bad when someone in a relationship with a partner openly disrespects them. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/11/25 07:05 PM |
| 0 | Men being the ones to initiate is not a failure of feminismTo be fair, they even allowed men under 23 to leave the country. Men under 25 aren't currently subject to military service. And, there are also a bunch of other exceptions like if your brother/father is fighting you don’t have to go, or if you have 3 children or a disability, etc. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/11/25 07:02 PM |
| 9 | Men being the ones to initiate is not a failure of feminism>Lately I've noticed a lot of hot takes from men bemoaning the idea that they're expected to approach women while women have the privilege of remaining passive. They argue that real equality would mean women take the role of initiator in romantic relationships just as often, and the fact that they don't is tantamount to feminist hypocrisy. So, men are right here and really expose the hypocrisy of these feminists in their unwillingness to adopt not only the "pleasant" male gender roles, but also … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/11/25 06:59 PM |
| 3 | Its not “Alpha Fucks Beta Bucks” for women to change their priorities over time.If the wife and children don't love this man, then yes, it will be hard to believe in his happiness. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/11/25 06:41 PM |
| 5 | Its not “Alpha Fucks Beta Bucks” for women to change their priorities over time.>As soon as a guy mention he’s a happily married stepdad, this sub calls him a dumb loser cuck lowering himself to trash, It's actually funny how well your comment confirms my thoughts. After all, even here we're not just talking about a normal, happy marriage, but a marriage with one partner already have children, which has a completely different dynamic, one that's more complex. And not only will no one call "happily married stepdad" a cuckold if he's genuinely happy, his wife and children lov… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/11/25 06:28 PM |
| 5 | Its not “Alpha Fucks Beta Bucks” for women to change their priorities over time.I'm not surprised, in principle, that you missed my point that I knew all these people personally and that this wasn't "gossip." Oh well, it's business as usual—what doesn't fit your worldview is simply "gossip and fanfiction." | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/11/25 06:22 PM |
| 2 | Its not “Alpha Fucks Beta Bucks” for women to change their priorities over time.Yeah, I also think that men should stay away from women who were more positive towards their exes. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/11/25 04:43 PM |
| 5 | Its not “Alpha Fucks Beta Bucks” for women to change their priorities over time.I think we've already been through this. I should remember what I listed back then, but here's a quick rundown: 1) A man whose wife cheated on him, systematically using violence and humiliation against him, despite the fact that he was a truly amazing husband, even taking care of all the household chores. And yes, she literally said she "settled on him." We helped him with the divorce because he's a family friend, so that's accurate information. And she also turned this man's daughter against hi… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/11/25 04:42 PM |
| 0 | Its not “Alpha Fucks Beta Bucks” for women to change their priorities over time.>Lots of men are just bitter that they have to show that effort. If this effort is significantly greater than what other people would have to put in for the same or better results, then these men shouldn't accept it with a smile. This is blatantly unfair and, at the very least, shows that these men's partners don't really want them in return. These are essentially efforts to get a woman who hates you. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/11/25 04:27 PM |
| 4 | Its not “Alpha Fucks Beta Bucks” for women to change their priorities over time.>Have some personal responsibility for yourself and stop comparing others actions to you.Your not them, the situation is different. >Some women will fuck on a third date, some need a few weeks, it depends on her and her feelings towards you. How wonderful that you presented two completely contradictory statements in two paragraphs. But yes, I completely agree with you in the second paragraph: how your partner treats you depends on their feelings for you! That's why men need to look at everything… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/11/25 04:24 PM |
| 14 | Its not “Alpha Fucks Beta Bucks” for women to change their priorities over time.The point is that "Beta Bucks" are men who are treated less favorably (yes, objectively less favorably) than "Alpha Fucks," who are treated more favorably sexually and romantically. No one, I repeat, NO ONE, would call any man a "Beta" if that man has a wife who truly values him in ALL respects (and of course, this should be mutual, and he should value her as well, but that's not the main point of our discussion right now). But the problem here is, I repeat, "Beta" men are at a disadvantage fr… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/11/25 04:12 PM |
| 4 | Its not “Alpha Fucks Beta Bucks” for women to change their priorities over time.Well, my opinion says that this exists. And I've seen this in real life many times. As you can see, personal experience is not universal. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/11/25 04:04 PM |
| 4 | What's the point of sleeping with someone you aren't attracted to?She still receives all the same social benefits as married men. That is, she is viewed more positively in society. Not to mention the feeling of romantic loneliness (which also exists among women, as friends won't fix it). As well as financial gain (after all, even having one additional income can already afford much more in terms of overall standard of living), and quite often I've seen women take the approach of "my money is my money, his money is our (family) money." + It's worth remembering … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/11/25 12:28 PM |
| 2 | I think many (conservative) men are hypocrites because they say stuff like "not all men are bad" but act differently when it comes to their own daughters and sisters.There's no contradiction here. Because "not all men are bad" only works as an argument when more liberal women and men don't single out individual bad men from the group. This denigrates ALL men, which is simply offensive to normal men, but worst of all, it wastes the effort to find truly terrible men who should be avoided. For example, as a man who has never raised a hand to a woman in a physical confrontation (though the opposite has happened many times), I can still understand that some women… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/11/25 12:19 PM |
| 2 | N COUNTS WEEKLY DISCUSSION THREAD>Yeah, that's life. It's the good and the bad. Staying inside your bedroom all your life might be stable but for me that's not what I see as a good life Of course, just like getting into a terrible marriage where you won't be respected can't be called a good life either. >Never said it was a diagnosis. But yeah insecurities do lead to suffering. And yet you confidently speak of some kind of "suffering" >If you're jealous for real reasons, like they cheated on you, that's not insecurity, that's a… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 20/11/25 04:03 PM |
| 1 | N COUNTS WEEKLY DISCUSSION THREADI think religiosity is definitely a factor here, but it's wrong to blame everything on it right now. After all, as far as I understand, casual sex and other more secular things have already become quite common among ordinary Christians, and only truly religious communities, which are probably not the majority, are not involved. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 20/11/25 03:35 PM |
| 1 | N COUNTS WEEKLY DISCUSSION THREAD>I disagree here, I think a good life is a life where you experience things, of course that's just an opinion I'd agree with this if it were a guarantee of only good things in life. But unfortunately, that's not the case, and the chances of getting screwed are still high. >Bad comparison. If we are talking about actual insecurities then you're not healthy No, the comparison is actually perfect, and you kind of confirmed it. "Insecurities" are usually not a real diagnosis and are not directly rel… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 20/11/25 03:32 PM |
| 1 | N COUNTS WEEKLY DISCUSSION THREADThis is the study most often taken | /r/PurplePillDebate | 20/11/25 01:34 PM |
| 2 | N COUNTS WEEKLY DISCUSSION THREAD>Insecurity is insecurity. If you have rational concerns it's something else. I'm glad you agree here, so there's nothing wrong with "insecurity." Especially since we don't really have to use that term. >Not everyone needs to have a life A bad life, of course. >Yeah that's having a life Of course, just like life is not about having a sea of problems and grief in life, but trying to live in a way that makes you comfortable. >That's like seeing an overweight, physically weak person, who can't ru… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 20/11/25 01:26 PM |
| 0 | N COUNTS WEEKLY DISCUSSION THREADOf course, but constantly comparing partners is hardly a good way | /r/PurplePillDebate | 20/11/25 01:18 PM |
| 2 | N COUNTS WEEKLY DISCUSSION THREADDon't worry, virgins still have the lowest chance of divorce and the highest marital satisfaction. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 20/11/25 01:17 PM |
| 0 | N COUNTS WEEKLY DISCUSSION THREADOf course, just like with my theory that a partner with a high n-count may constantly compare their current partner with romanticized experiences of the past, especially considering that serious relationships do not have the same “ease” as situational ones | /r/PurplePillDebate | 20/11/25 12:31 PM |
| 3 | N COUNTS WEEKLY DISCUSSION THREADWell, there's some really interesting statistics there, because those with 1-4 partners are essentially will get divorced sooner than those with 5-20. And it should also be taken into account that the discrepancy in n-counts between partners also has an even greater impact on the likelihood of divorce and marital satisfaction. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 20/11/25 12:10 PM |
| 2 | N COUNTS WEEKLY DISCUSSION THREAD>Insecurity means fragility of the ego Of course, but it's also often an attempt to shame someone out of their rational concerns. >Anyone can get outside of their comfort zone 🤔 depend what you comfort zone is And not everyone needs to leave their comfort zone. >Disappointed really? It depends on your psyche, any experience can be disappointing or rewarding depending on your outlook I mentioned disappointment because it's the least harmful result of leaving your comfort zone. There could be many… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 20/11/25 12:02 PM |
| – | Why do high-body-count women get the most offended when men prefer low body count?Because even with all their denial, they understand perfectly well that caring about their partner's past is mainstream and completely normal. It was normal in the past, it is normal today, and it will be normal in the future. That's why, for example, even "confident" and rather promiscuous people still use advice like "don't talk about your past, don't stir up skeletons in the closet," and so on. Because even they understand perfectly well that even they find it unpleasant, and this is based on… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 20/11/25 10:24 AM |
| 1 | N COUNTS WEEKLY DISCUSSION THREADFor some reason, they assume that those who are insecure are somehow sick. But self-doubt, for the most part, doesn't negatively impact life at all, and, on the contrary, can even reduce the number of bad things in someone's life. It's literally a defense mechanism for your psyche because your brain sees that these are unsuitable conditions for you. Their advice reminds me of people who encourage others to "leave their comfort zone," not realizing that not everyone is lucky enough to do so, and … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 20/11/25 07:12 AM |
| 7 | Men need to be a compilation of masculine and feminine traits in order to be successful in relationships and they are having trouble grasping that fact>These roles are not destroyed for women in relationships. No, these roles have definitely been eliminated because they are deeply optional. "But if a couple wants children, the woman will have to give birth!" But what if there's no question about children? Such a situation is absolutely possible, and right now, the number of childless couples, or couples who have children much later, is enormous. >The in relationships was implied here as men don't have any gender roles outside of relationships … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/11/25 08:38 AM |
| 1 | Too many men see selfishness as normal masculine behavior and it results in loneliness (amongst other things).>So? People have always been selfish, greedy, cruel, etc, as well as altruistic, loving and practical. Human nature is manifest in all sorts of storytelling So?Didn't you read my comment where I explained in detail that in the past, societies suppressed the negative traits of this? >No society has ever been perfect, or even close to perfect Of course, but I'm not saying everything was perfect in the past. It's just different than it is now, and there's a specific, very positive feature (the inst… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/11/25 06:18 PM |
| 15 | Men need to be a compilation of masculine and feminine traits in order to be successful in relationships and they are having trouble grasping that fact>This is where I think the real disconnect is. You say here that women have abandoned their gender role and I dont agree. The traditional part of womens gender roles is sex and babies And yes, these roles are now abolished for women. There is no forced sex or childbirth, and abortions are perfectly acceptable (which is good). So yes, women's roles are destroyed here. And no, the female role of "passive partner" is equal to the male role of "active partner," so there's no point in mixing sex and … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/11/25 06:15 PM |
| 1 | Too many men see selfishness as normal masculine behavior and it results in loneliness (amongst other things).>Hunter gatherer societies did have hierarchies, oppression, injustice, favoritism, corruption, slavery, hypocrisy, weird rules/traditions, etc, just like modern societies do. It's entirely possible that this was the case (though modern hunter gatherer societies don't really confirm this, but oh well). But it's hard to develop this in a tiny society, most of which consisted of a couple of hundred people, where everyone knew each other very well. Reputation is important. >And they were way more v… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/11/25 05:59 PM |
| 26 | Men need to be a compilation of masculine and feminine traits in order to be successful in relationships and they are having trouble grasping that fact>Moreover, some men seem to be misenpereting the assertion that men don't need to fit 100% of gender stereotype to mean men don't need to embody ANY masculine characteristics. This is just incredibly naive. >For heterosexual women, a man needs to have some masculine attributes in order to be appealing. That's not some secret and no it doesn't contradict what women have been asking for in men. It's nuance, which men apparently struggle with mightily. No, these aren't just some masculine traits, b… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/11/25 04:08 PM |
| 3 | Too many men see selfishness as normal masculine behavior and it results in loneliness (amongst other things).Does that change anything? Or can only psychos be terrible people? They can be as terrible as they want, but as long as they don't do terrible things, then everything's fine. And it's even better when they do good things. «It doesn't matter whether a cat is white or black, as long as it catches mice.» | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/11/25 11:45 AM |
| 3 | Too many men see selfishness as normal masculine behavior and it results in loneliness (amongst other things).So they did good deeds and didn't harm anyone. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/11/25 11:38 AM |
| 2 | Too many men see selfishness as normal masculine behavior and it results in loneliness (amongst other things).No, there's no sexual slavery. It's just that if you're not good, you literally have no chance of any benefits at all, material or non-material (like social connections in general, friendship, family, romance, and everything in between). You're either good or not very much alive, it's that simple. In principle, being "good" by the standards of the society in which you lived (and most likely would live for the rest of your life) was vital, and the institution of reputation was a fundamental thing… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/11/25 11:27 AM |
| 1 | Too many men see selfishness as normal masculine behavior and it results in loneliness (amongst other things).No, you don't feel anything, there's no sexual slavery. It's just that if you're not good, you literally have no chance of achieving any benefits, material or non-material (like social connections in general, friendship, family, romance, and everything else). | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/11/25 11:27 AM |
| 2 | Too many men see selfishness as normal masculine behavior and it results in loneliness (amongst other things).And no, it's not really; this is an approach that has worked for literally tens of thousands of years. From the time of hunter-gatherer tribes all the way to the villages of the early 20th century. It's simply a scientific fact. Societies used to be smaller, and a greater sense of cohesion was necessary for survival, because you had to be more "kind and tolerant" because it whether you survive depends on other people. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/11/25 07:01 AM |
| 9 | Too many men see selfishness as normal masculine behavior and it results in loneliness (amongst other things).Of course, and this approach actually increases the amount of shit in the world, because then bad people don't have even the transactional motivation to do good things. As a result, there are fewer and fewer good things, and so on. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/11/25 06:52 AM |
| 0 | Too many men see selfishness as normal masculine behavior and it results in loneliness (amongst other things).>being good means being good without expecting an award Again, this shitty approach that's ideal for bad people to do more evil. Surely I need to repeat that even if bad people have transactional motivation to do good things, it's still better than them directly doing bad things? >A big part of the reason I thought about making this post is because I noticed that a lot of men believed women communicating to men is threatening to punish their boyfriend (ie with dumping him) like a mother threaten… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/11/25 06:51 AM |
| 8 | Too many men see selfishness as normal masculine behavior and it results in loneliness (amongst other things).Just like morally bad individuals are suppressed, and only good ones can reproduce and survive. But it doesn't work now and bad people are still okay | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/11/25 06:42 AM |
| 1 | People do give men a bunch of chances before giving up on them.Then talk about the problem at its core, instead of endlessly insulting your partner with barbs over trivial matters and wondering why your relationship is shit. It's a two-way street. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 16/11/25 07:11 PM |
| 0 | People do give men a bunch of chances before giving up on them.Let me copy and paste what you clearly didn’t bother to read: No, rather, they view their partner as a functional adult rather than a child. But this would be an insult to children, who are also capable of coherent, complex speech. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 16/11/25 05:26 PM |
| 1 | People do give men a bunch of chances before giving up on them.>This goes hand-in-hand with guys who swear that “the break up came from nowhere”. When in reality he was warned multiple times about the problems in their relationship and he refused to change them and then he’s shocked that she actually gave up on him instead of “nagging him” for the 11th time. In fact, the most important thing here is the way he or she communicates their concerns to their significant other. Very often, these wonderful women are truly terrible at communicating their interests … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 16/11/25 04:57 PM |
| – | Debate me: people who claim they see through BS are the easiest to scam in dating and relationships>There are documentaries of women going to Africa and marrying guys believing they had found the soulmate. This is what desperation and sexual starvation do to a person Honestly, I've noticed this quite strongly in some women from my culture. They often travel to other countries precisely because they've found a "prince on a white horse," and then they find us local men truly awful. But then, boom, everything turns out to be far from rosy, and this "prince" turns out to be a piece of shit, but i… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 16/11/25 04:43 PM |
| 1 | Debate me: people who claim they see through BS are the easiest to scam in dating and relationshipsYes, I definitely agree with that. But it's relevant when men say they can see through other men's lies. Or when women see through other women. The main thing that helps them see through lies and manipulation is the lack of romantic and sexual attraction. This is the reason why men constantly see fuckboys, "bad boys," as much better than women (no matter what they claim, even "experienced women don't succeed here"). | /r/PurplePillDebate | 16/11/25 10:56 AM |
| 1 | Do you like the idea of AI robot wife?Probably not, or maybe in some partially platonic context. And it would be preferable if they were truly high-quality "androids." Probably with at least some semblance of free will. For me, that's not a problem, as I'm quite empathetic; it's not hard to even say thank you to a GPT chat. I don't have any particular problems with real women, and I'm young, so it doesn't make much sense. Although, if I were 40 and single, I'd probably go there, at least to try it out of curiosity. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 16/11/25 10:51 AM |
| 1 | How is a man the 'leader' in a relationship?>Yet in most cases, the actual 'management' of a household (comparable to what an executive would do at a company) is done by the woman. She decides what the house looks like, attends the 'meetings' (school's parent events, kids' doctor's visits, etc.), is in charge of the allocation of funds (groceries, other purchases), trains and disciplines the 'subordinates' (kids; just using corporate lingo), etc. Everything you listed this is a very small part of family life, but… oh well…. But seriously,… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/11/25 04:35 PM |
| -7 | Men formulate their questions correctlyYou didn't read my comment. Okay. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/11/25 10:23 AM |
| 1 | Men formulate their questions correctlyWell, maybe next time you shouldn't use your relationship with your husband as an argument. Then you won't be surprised when others have to respond to it. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/11/25 10:22 AM |
| 1 | Men formulate their questions correctlyhttps://preview.redd.it/qzrlpze9671g1.jpeg?width=915&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=a3467cfa805567aabb92e5385b613e497f9920c2 I didn't block you or delete anything. This automod secretly deleted my comment. This happens to me all the time. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/11/25 10:11 AM |
| 1 | Men formulate their questions correctlyOkay, then I just hope everything is okay and that you both enjoy everything. After all, I'm not ugly and I don't wish anyone harm. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/11/25 10:02 AM |
| 1 | Men formulate their questions correctlyOf course, I believe there are many people who don't pay attention to sex and/or consider it unimportant. But a term has already been coined for these people; they're called "asexuals," and statistically, they make up 1% of the population. So, relying on their experience is simply not entirely accurate. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/11/25 10:00 AM |
| -9 | Men formulate their questions correctly>A relationship is more than sex (what percentage of the whole relationship sex takes up 1%?). So you give advice that incorporates stuff that is outside of sex and then you immediately get comments like "that won't get me sex". Sex is still an essential part of a relationship. Of course, one can debate how important it is, but it's important in any case and interconnected in any case, so there's no point in ignoring it. "How can I have a relationship without sex!?" No one in their right mind or… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/11/25 09:59 AM |
| 1 | Men formulate their questions correctly>So you can keep your ideas and i can keep my husband and our sex life. I really hope you actually have a sex life. Because from what you've said, it doesn't sound like it at all. <image> And again, again, deletes comments | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/11/25 09:50 AM |
| 1 | Men formulate their questions correctlyBut relationships are still sex. So there's no point in separating sex and relationships as different; they're one and the same. The only thing is, you can differentiate between different types of sex, such as ONS, FWB, or LTR, etc. But not sex and romance in the context of LTR; they're the same thing and directly related. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/11/25 08:46 AM |
| -1 | Men formulate their questions correctlyAnd a perfect example of "(some) woman don't listen" Why even ask if you're going to say "nuh, uh"? And I believe that you don’t even know what you’re talking about, because even though you’ve been in a 17-year happy relationship, it’s obviously asexual relationship . Relationship and sex are not separate, but intertwine. Hence the answers are simple if you not asexual. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/11/25 08:43 AM |
| -1 | Men formulate their questions correctlyNext time, add more gaslighting about men being lustful pigs, which doesn't seem credible to you. And yes, you're separating sex and romance here again. How nice to see confirmation of my post right here. >Men spelled it out for us, in no uncertain words that they don't want to be in relationship, don't want to be liked enough for relationship, some want to be assholes but still get sex. "want to be liked enough for a relationship" is directly related to sex, because as I have already repeated, … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/11/25 08:37 AM |
| 0 | Men formulate their questions correctlyIt's understandable when people differentiate between casual sex and LTR sex. But it's definitely not understandable when people separate sex and romance as completely unrelated things in the context of LTR, or even more so when they completely dismiss sex as unimportant. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/11/25 08:33 AM |
| 1 | Men formulate their questions correctly>So guys ask about a healthy relationship (which is one thing, as a relationship doesn't require an active sex life, think of old couples or couples who wait till marriage), but they mean a healthy sex life in a relationship (which is the same for having casual sex). A perfect example from my post. No, in normal couples, sex is a basic and constant part (with ups and downs, but it exists). If you have to justify it by saying, "Oh, but people over 70 year old don't have a ton of sex! (Even though… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/11/25 08:30 AM |
| -2 | Men formulate their questions correctlyWhat?... | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/11/25 07:54 AM |
| 1 | Men formulate their questions correctlyAnd that's normal. Knowing whether you know something or not is a good trait for anyone. A measure of intelligence. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/11/25 07:39 AM |
| -1 | Men formulate their questions correctlyI can probably agree with that, but it's also something that's always struck me. Supposedly, most women should still have some kind of libido, some weaker, some stronger, but it exists. Statistically, asexuals certainly aren't the majority of people, since women who are supposed to be sexy can live in a dead bedroom. But then they can confidently say that they've never seen a woman settle down, nothing like that! (And it doesn't matter that they haven't wanted to fuck their husbands for years; t… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/11/25 07:30 AM |
| 1 | Men make no sense in any regard.>Men: We want virgins and women who desire us and will have sex with us and who are wifey material. >Women: Okay, has sex and loses their V cards with the men they desire. It's clear from the start that the men complain about this and the men these women have sex with are different men. So it's not surprising that these ordinary men don't encourage women who have sex with completely different, more attractive men. Therefore, there is no contradiction here. >Men: We want someone who will be loyal… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/11/25 08:59 AM |
| 1 | Don’t be upset you didn’t get a hook up when you pretended you wanted a relationship.Guy: Men just want consistency! Its disrespectful for women to instantly fuck the bum ass loser, but then expect other men to have a good job, ambitions, a great personality, etc. Me: Did you ask her for a hookup or a relationship? Guy: Why does that matter?! And the guy is absolutely right here, because sex in a relationship is a given, as is sexual attraction. For most people, the desire for a relationship is inevitably linked to the desire for sex, meaning not for asexuals... What do you want… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 11/11/25 06:55 PM |
| 1 | The idea that older men dating younger women are losers - is a woman's revenge fantasy.Why are you saying this?... I know such women exist, unfortunately. And I'm not usually in favor of such a large age gap, and I myself find it hard to date girls even five years younger than me; I feel weird about it. Then I find it easier with older women. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/11/25 03:38 PM |
| 1 | The idea that older men dating younger women are losers - is a woman's revenge fantasy.Well, this is a perfect example of how a woman in this case really immerses herself in fantasies about how these men are losers. While I can't say I like their «show” (I don't think it's good), I wouldn't dare say they're losers. They have everything going for them in life, and they won't disappear. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/11/25 03:34 PM |
| -3 | The idea that older men dating younger women are losers - is a woman's revenge fantasy.Thank you for confirming my post | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/11/25 03:31 PM |
| 10 | The idea that older men dating younger women are losers - is a woman's revenge fantasy.The mother's influence here is even greater, considering the birth itself rather than the child's health. And that's not to mention the fact that the average time to get pregnant is also shorter for women. Although, again, if this is a concern for a woman, I certainly won't stop her from seeking a younger father. The main thing is that she also doesn't forget about herself. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/11/25 03:29 PM |
| 1 | The idea that older men dating younger women are losers - is a woman's revenge fantasy.No, I say that she projects and creates fantasies that I talk about in my post. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/11/25 03:26 PM |
| 1 | The idea that older men dating younger women are losers - is a woman's revenge fantasy.>But are they saying this while actually knowing these women? These women also say all this without even knowing these men. So it doesn't matter. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/11/25 03:24 PM |
| 13 | The idea that older men dating younger women are losers - is a woman's revenge fantasy.Fun fact of the day: Maternal age has a specific impact on maternal health complications during childbirth. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/11/25 03:21 PM |
| 2 | The idea that older men dating younger women are losers - is a woman's revenge fantasy.She still used derogatory terms and urged them to go to therapy (implying they had problems). So yes, this is a perfect confirmation of my post. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/11/25 03:20 PM |
| 1 | The idea that older men dating younger women are losers - is a woman's revenge fantasy.No, this guy is still not a loser, especially if he was able to get a younger girl on "favorable" terms. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/11/25 03:18 PM |
| 1 | The idea that older men dating younger women are losers - is a woman's revenge fantasy.I can agree with this. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/11/25 03:15 PM |
| 5 | The idea that older men dating younger women are losers - is a woman's revenge fantasy.Thank you for confirming my post | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/11/25 03:14 PM |
| 4 | The idea that older men dating younger women are losers - is a woman's revenge fantasy.You too🤷♂️ | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/11/25 03:12 PM |
| 1 | The idea that older men dating younger women are losers - is a woman's revenge fantasy.I don't know. Men who talk about "the wall" also don't want older women. But that doesn't stop these women from labeling these men as "having revenge fantasies." | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/11/25 03:12 PM |
| 1 | The idea that older men dating younger women are losers - is a woman's revenge fantasy.Honestly, this clip is very much in line with my post. Because this woman is openly trying to brand these men as losers and comes up with all sorts of reasons. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/11/25 03:07 PM |
| 0 | The idea that older men dating younger women are losers - is a woman's revenge fantasy.I think it's because these men aren't interested in older women. Maybe it's not just that they're not their type, or maybe there are other reasons, but it's definitely not because they're losers and can't handle older women. Younger women are the most sought-after group, so there's the most competition for them. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/11/25 03:03 PM |
| -2 | The idea that older men dating younger women are losers - is a woman's revenge fantasy.Thank you for confirming my post | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/11/25 03:00 PM |
| – | The idea that older men dating younger women are losers - is a woman's revenge fantasy.Thank you for confirming my post | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/11/25 03:00 PM |
| 2 | The idea that older men dating younger women are losers - is a woman's revenge fantasy.Thank you for confirming my post | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/11/25 03:00 PM |
| 2 | The idea that older men dating younger women are losers - is a woman's revenge fantasy.I don't care about most women, I don't date most women Then I don't care that you don't care. Because it's a fact. Absolutely not true. My girlfriend is 31 and I've seen her pictures, she has never been hotter. I'm glad she is, she's an exception. Unironically, I hope everything works out for you both. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/11/25 02:58 PM |
| 1 | The idea that older men dating younger women are losers - is a woman's revenge fantasy.I agree that this kind of criticism is most often encountered online. But we're online now, so it's all fine. I would also agree that older women can be criticized for dating younger guys (I've experienced this myself), but I still think they're more often shamed by other women. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/11/25 02:56 PM |
| -2 | The idea that older men dating younger women are losers - is a woman's revenge fantasy.Again, this older guy still got her and the “cute” guy her age, mmmm... No. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/11/25 02:54 PM |
| -2 | The idea that older men dating younger women are losers - is a woman's revenge fantasy.Well, it still happens, and men like that sometimes find themselves in situations like this. But, yes, it's rare. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/11/25 02:52 PM |
| 0 | The idea that older men dating younger women are losers - is a woman's revenge fantasy.Often because he wants it. I've known men who were very casual even at 40. And yet, I know for a fact that they had tons of opportunities and no problems from an early age. But yes, you literally confirmed my post, thank you. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/11/25 02:51 PM |
| 1 | The idea that older men dating younger women are losers - is a woman's revenge fantasy.Just like men who talk about the wall and women over 30—they don't care about these women and don't want to date them. But this doesn't stop older women from getting offended and trying to claim that men have "revenge fantasies." | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/11/25 02:49 PM |
| 2 | The idea that older men dating younger women are losers - is a woman's revenge fantasy.Nobody cares about averages, you're dating a person, not a statistical trend. I only care that the person is hot and somewhat mature, the age doesn't matter. The point is, most women are much more attractive when they're younger. That's not a debate, it's a fact. Of course, there are plenty of women who are still very hot in their 30s and 40s. I myself, when I was just over 20, dated a 28-year-old girl, for example. But the point is that they were all, despite everything, hotter in their 20s. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/11/25 02:46 PM |
| -5 | The idea that older men dating younger women are losers - is a woman's revenge fantasy.Because I'm saying that an older man can attract a younger woman in a variety of ways, not just through pure attraction. But ultimately, it doesn't matter at all, since he's proven himself to be significantly more attractive than literally hundreds of other men competing here. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/11/25 02:44 PM |
| 7 | The idea that older men dating younger women are losers - is a woman's revenge fantasy.Of course, as you say | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/11/25 02:42 PM |
| 6 | The idea that older men dating younger women are losers - is a woman's revenge fantasy.Of course, and no one can stop you. While other women might not like it, I think you can handle it. And then, carefully monitor your reproductive health. Not only the baby's health depends on it, but also yours during childbirth. Much more than the quality of their sperm. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/11/25 02:42 PM |
| 1 | The idea that older men dating younger women are losers - is a woman's revenge fantasy.I can agree with this. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/11/25 02:40 PM |
| 10 | The idea that older men dating younger women are losers - is a woman's revenge fantasy.Then it's not a revenge fantasy, it's just a fantasy. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/11/25 02:40 PM |
| 2 | The idea that older men dating younger women are losers - is a woman's revenge fantasy.I might agree, there is no point in being obsessed with someone's relationship if they are strangers to you. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/11/25 02:39 PM |
| 0 | If sex with Men degrades Women according to some Men ,then they should be ok with Women not having sex with men at all.>You're just again saying "men won't hate the woman they are having sex with" which again does not remove the stain from her from his dick after the relationship ends which most do. And I have to reiterate that even men who care about N-count don't pursue relationships with women with a high N-count, but rather seek relationships with less experienced women. So yes, the relationships these men seek are never-ending, so there's no point in thinking about "removing the stain from her from his dick… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/11/25 02:08 PM |
| 8 | N COUNTS WEEKLY DISCUSSION THREADYes, exactly. Heterosexual men don't care what other men think about their sexual abilities because there's no interest between them. So the only ones who can "sexually shame" men are other women. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/11/25 09:57 AM |
| 0 | If sex with Men degrades Women according to some Men ,then they should be ok with Women not having sex with men at all.>The fact that a man may not verbally degrade the woman he's currently having sex with means absolutely nothing, given that most relationships don't last and she will now carry the stain from his dick after the relationship. I don't even engage in slut-shaming, so the approach the OP is proposing wouldn't apply to me. But even here, I understand that this is bullshit. You do understand that men who adhere to such values are often conservative, right? Their entire strategy is to find one woman … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/11/25 09:53 AM |
| -2 | If sex with Men degrades Women according to some Men ,then they should be ok with Women not having sex with men at all.>Yes they do. No, because this woman only fucks them and not other men. >The problem with this is that it covers the man's spam of time within that relationship while for women it covers the span of their lifetime. No one cares whether it was 2 years ago or 10 minutes ago, it doesn't matter to anyone. And even those who are supposedly very confident in their sexual abilities still avoid talking about their past. Apparently, precisely to avoid "unnecessary drama," because even they understand tha… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/11/25 09:47 AM |
| 0 | If sex with Men degrades Women according to some Men ,then they should be ok with Women not having sex with men at all.Diamonds are also unlimited and are produced by artificial means, and are even better than natural ones. But guess what? That's right, natural diamonds are still much more valuable than artificial ones due to the difficulty of obtaining them. So, quantity and unlimited availability don't play such a big role here. Oh, and don't even get me started on how women supposedly don't hate virgins, my God... Such nonsense. I just remember a post here recently with exactly this content, where a woman cla… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/11/25 09:43 AM |
| -2 | If sex with Men degrades Women according to some Men ,then they should be ok with Women not having sex with men at all.I didn't think I'd have to defend slut-shaming, but here we are.… >While a Man who has plenty of sex is lauded and seen as superior for having sex with plenty of women. According to them ,A Man's value increases when he has sex while a Woman's value decreases It's all simply a matter of the basic truth by which the hypothetical value of something is assessed. The rarer and more limited something is, the higher its value. The more common it is, the less valued it is. I think there's no disputing … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/11/25 06:34 AM |
| 6 | “Personally” is not a synonym for “nice meek pushover”>I'm tall, and for a long time I couldn't get a date to save my life. So by this logic, height doesn't matter and all the men claiming tall men have it so easy dating should "radicalize" me, am I right? This is somehow incoherent... I said that these men had already been good for a very long time/or were raised as doormats, but that didn't bring them success >No it doesn't. People will certainly be delusional about their partners' true nature, but when those same people go to defend their partne… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/11/25 11:49 PM |
| 3 | Men will use the “women just hate male sexuality” excuse when criticized displaying for selfish behavior.It's funny how a conversation about romance quickly devolved into completely unrelated platonic connections. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/11/25 11:44 PM |
| 2 | “Personally” is not a synonym for “nice meek pushover”I don't quite understand how these two things are connected... Oh well, I'll try not to remember all those people I knew who were abandoned despite being amazing people, while there were a bunch of toxic, terrible people with no problems. Unfortunately, life isn't that good 😞 | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/11/25 11:42 PM |
| 6 | Men will use the “women just hate male sexuality” excuse when criticized displaying for selfish behavior.Okay, I realized again that you're asexual and aromantic. Well, it was stupid to try to talk. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/11/25 11:17 PM |
| 1 | “Personally” is not a synonym for “nice meek pushover”>That CAN is carrying a lot of weight when MOST won’t It would be nice if this were the case, but unfortunately we live in the real world. So even here, many women who are actively against RP and other "bad boys" and "fuckboys" - still calmly admitted that, in the presence of "redeeming qualities," even their high personal standards fly out the window and do not return. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/11/25 11:15 PM |
| 12 | “Personally” is not a synonym for “nice meek pushover”Many men here, even those who are now more radical, have already actively listened to this advice, but it hasn't helped them at all. And it doesn't help that women here (even those who are mature and reasonable) have also calmly acknowledged that, given the presence of "redeeming qualities," the requirement to be a good person flies out the window and never returns. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/11/25 11:12 PM |
| 3 | Men will use the “women just hate male sexuality” excuse when criticized displaying for selfish behavior.>Men: Women dont care about men’s issues! >Women: SA not being taken seriously? Circumcision? The draft? Homophobia? Being forced to uphold toxic behavior that’s propagandized as masculinity? >Men: OUR PENISES ARENT BEING TOUCHED! WE’RE LONELY! >Women: If youre lonely, go make friends- >Men: But HOW will that get our penises touched?! Is it again a misunderstanding that friendship and romance are completely different things? Or that loneliness is a very real and serious problem, on par with ever… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/11/25 11:09 PM |
| 2 | “Personally” is not a synonym for “nice meek pushover”True, but if you hadn't deliberately ignored my analogy, you would have realized that I'm talking about how many people ignore the basic thing you described as being "nice." Because men who aren't "nice" can still have sex quite successfully. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/11/25 11:04 PM |
| 4 | “Personally” is not a synonym for “nice meek pushover”That is, evading the answer... Okay. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/11/25 10:51 PM |
| 9 | “Personally” is not a synonym for “nice meek pushover”This is the advice that's still often given to men here in earnest. There are also a bunch of posters here who just today made more than three posts on this topic. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/11/25 10:50 PM |
| 1 | Men will use the “women just hate male sexuality” excuse when criticized displaying for selfish behavior.A poster who can post a couple of times a day constantly shaming men, not only for wanting sex with their partners, but also for years of shitting on single men and only on them—now claims that women actually have no problem with male sexuality at all. What a joke. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/11/25 10:49 PM |
| 1 | “Personally” is not a synonym for “nice meek pushover”It's important to remember that a very large number of restaurants fail to provide any kind of food at all. Or they may only provide beautiful plates and cutlery, but for some reason, even that's enough to people continued to go to these restaurants , and when other people asked, "What about the food? Isn't that a basic requirement?", they would answer, "Well, we can come to this restaurant even if there is no food, because there is good music." | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/11/25 10:43 PM |
| 13 | “Personally” is not a synonym for “nice meek pushover”No, this is intentionally evasive. Even your first search query will reveal that "good personality" is defined as kind, sympathetic, loyal, compassionate, and so on. Only then do the social qualities of a good personality come into play, from a communication perspective. And it doesn't help that many women also advise "looking at women as people" and literally say that men need to be kind. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/11/25 10:38 PM |
| 2 | 30 year old women hitting the wall and regretting things won’t change anything for men.>If you werent physically attractive in your 20s to her nothing will change now just because she is 30.( in the sexual department.) She will most likely still not want you sexually. It still wont change anything for you. I completely agree, and this is precisely why men should keep an eye on the past relationships of the women they date. If her type of man in her youth was completely different - that's a bad sign. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/11/25 03:42 PM |
| 1 | Men hate women who like bad men but don't care about those bad men. And that means they hate women not for "bad choices" but for not choosing them.Don't ask such difficult questions, there will be no answer. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/11/25 02:39 PM |
| 1 | It’s easier to change your behaviors and beliefs than your looks and income.I agree, a truly good person doesn't want there to be less evil in the world. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/11/25 02:37 PM |
| 1 | Men hate women who like bad men but don't care about those bad men. And that means they hate women not for "bad choices" but for not choosing them.It seems like you didn't answer my question... Oh well... >Yeah you got evidence the back up that last statment? Is recording with bodycam suitable? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/11/25 02:36 PM |
| 2 | It’s easier to change your behaviors and beliefs than your looks and income.This is some kind of verbal hodgepodge…. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/11/25 02:32 PM |
| 2 | It’s easier to change your behaviors and beliefs than your looks and income.Then there will be more and more evil in the world. I hope you will be happy about this. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/11/25 02:32 PM |
| 5 | Men hate women who like bad men but don't care about those bad men. And that means they hate women not for "bad choices" but for not choosing them.Mutual🤝 | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/11/25 02:29 PM |
| – | Men hate women who like bad men but don't care about those bad men. And that means they hate women not for "bad choices" but for not choosing them.Then take a closer look at yourself, because at least I don't insult people for no reason. So I can be a better person than you. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/11/25 02:12 PM |
| 2 | It’s easier to change your behaviors and beliefs than your looks and income."Value genuinely good people" how? By shaming those who seek happiness for good people? Or by sabotaging the emergence of good deeds in the world, by motivating even bad people to do good for the sake of reward? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/11/25 02:10 PM |
| 0 | Men hate women who like bad men but don't care about those bad men. And that means they hate women not for "bad choices" but for not choosing them.>Also the abuse doesnt happen till he's got her hooked, alot women that came to me tell that during the time of the abuse they couldn't go anywhere because their boyfriends has their locations and would literally track them down. I'm honestly curious, but don't these women have family, friends, or a home to call their own? I can certainly understand that such terrible men might deliberately seek out weak women in difficult life situations, but we know that's not always the case. Because I, and m… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/11/25 02:07 PM |
| 4 | Men hate women who like bad men but don't care about those bad men. And that means they hate women not for "bad choices" but for not choosing them.>Like I honestly dont think you guys understand that these bad guys switch their personalities during relationships which ends up putting women into unwanted predicaments. Because most people aren't genius manipulators and Machiavellians. And even here, a bunch of women who are BlueP and supposedly mature and wise calmly and honestly admitted that, yes, they went after downright awful men simply because those men "were honest about being bad" and had "redeeming qualities," meaning they were hot … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/11/25 02:01 PM |
| 2 | It’s easier to change your behaviors and beliefs than your looks and income.>What does it have to do with my point? Literally the answer >So they’re not genuinely good. They’re assholes who are mad that opening doors for women didn’t open legs. Then people with your views are even worse than these men. After all, you're actively sabotaging the emergence of greater good in this world. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/11/25 01:35 PM |
| 15 | Men hate women who like bad men but don't care about those bad men. And that means they hate women not for "bad choices" but for not choosing them.>Then women are also blamed for wanting criminals, even though it's a small minority I agree that it's not a complete majority, but it's far from a minority either. At the very least, because then there wouldn't be the trope of "bad boys" and how women choose them out, especially at a young age. >The focus is always on women, how they are bad choosers and that they are immoral and corrupt etc. And it's never about actually those men who do all this stuff. Because men just can'tnothing can stand … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/11/25 01:29 PM |
| 2 | It’s easier to change your behaviors and beliefs than your looks and income.>If they were genuinely good, they wouldn’t get mad whenever I tell them that being a good person means not expecting a reward for it. There's nothing wrong with that at all. Any truly good person would be morally happy if bad people were punished or at least not rewarded. And yes, a "reward" (anything, we're not talking about sex slavery) would also be a good motivation for bad people to do good things, even if only for selfish reasons. This would lead to more good in the world, which truly goo… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/11/25 01:12 PM |
| 5 | It’s easier to change your behaviors and beliefs than your looks and income.First: What is a good personality? You say it's about not being an asshole (which I agree with). But many BluePs here, when they talk about a "good personality," mean communication skills, which has nothing to do with being a truly good person. Second: In fact, most "nice guys" and many RPs used to be genuinely good. So good that they were absurdly good and completely selfless. And only later, much later, after many romantic failures, did they become more bitter. So being morally good sincerely … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/11/25 11:28 AM |
| 7 | Being evil is not a factor when it comes to not being able to find a girlfriend>And and I know what you're going to say, that these women are bad therefore they don't count. >But how could you possibly know they're all "bad". What does bad even mean in this context? I bet they treat these men better than the average man gets treated by his wife. Yes, to be honest, I've always found it funny when someone tries to say that such women are necessarily terrible people and terrible partners. But these are completely incompatible conditions, and even if we assume that a girl who … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/11/25 08:23 AM |
| 5 | Blue Pillers are feminists need to offer men a decent alternative>So so angry. It's like there is a guy who sits with table full of food, and starving woman. She asks for food and men like if you're going to ask for food ask for me too. Is this metaphorical table with food that only men can eat - located in the same universe and timeline as us? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 05/11/25 12:55 PM |
| 3 | Blue Pillers are feminists need to offer men a decent alternative>Does every moral principle you believe in have to give you some reward? Yes, that would be nice. And not only because those who sincerely adhere to these moral principles would appreciate the bonus. But also for the very beneficial reason that even those who aren't interested in sincere support will still be at least neutral and at most supportive, even if it's out of self-interest. And even your questions about slavery are relevant, by the way, as they are confirmed by history. Slavery was sup… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 05/11/25 12:50 PM |
| 11 | Blue Pillers are feminists need to offer men a decent alternative>Individual women can be Yes, that's exactly it. And that's the problem: adequate feminists often don't seriously confront their radical "sisters." | /r/PurplePillDebate | 05/11/25 12:44 PM |
| 1 | Men who claim touch is their love language are a yellow flag.I think that men are not angry with you here, but rather confused. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 04/11/25 01:19 PM |
| 2 | Men who claim touch is their love language are a yellow flag.Of course, because the fact that ordinary people want to fuck their partners is a crime | /r/PurplePillDebate | 04/11/25 01:17 PM |
| 7 | Men who claim touch is their love language are a yellow flag.Aromantic who wrote in her posts that she sees no difference between friendship and romance, and who also constantly shames men who want to fuck their partners - is back again. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 04/11/25 01:10 PM |
| 0 | Single moms are a negative for a man, and only widows should get an exemption.Well, I was just joking that they also kill their cheating husband , it seems, | /r/PurplePillDebate | 04/11/25 01:08 PM |
| 0 | Single moms are a negative for a man, and only widows should get an exemption.This is already yandere territory. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 04/11/25 01:05 PM |
| – | Single moms are a negative for a man, and only widows should get an exemption.And now I must told my Ukrainian friends that they could be called «stoic masculine warrior.» | /r/PurplePillDebate | 04/11/25 01:04 PM |
| – | Single moms are a negative for a man, and only widows should get an exemption.What a weird shit about Ukraine, lol | /r/PurplePillDebate | 04/11/25 12:56 PM |
| 3 | Single moms are a negative for a man, and only widows should get an exemption.Honestly, widows and widowers can also be difficult to date. Basically, people who have died are often glorified and given a pass for their bullshit out of nostalgia (not a bad thing). But can you imagine what would happen if it was someone you truly loved and... Boom, a deep, undying love. And not that I'm going to blame widows and widowers for their love for their deceased spouse; it can even be a sign that this person is truly monogamous and faithful, but... For their future partner, this cou… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 04/11/25 12:50 PM |
| 5 | "Women want to be loved not lusted over" yet they keep pitching out for the top % of menBecause many of these women role-play and pretend to be happy. And then they turn around and drop the bomb, declaring they're asexual/aromantic or just not attracted to their husbands and don't want to fuck them. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 03/11/25 09:41 PM |
| 4 | "Women want to be loved not lusted over" yet they keep pitching out for the top % of men>An ugly man can abuse his woman because he wants to break her spirit and believe that she doesn't deserve any better than him Just no. This man simply doesn't have the necessary skills and life experience to manipulate convincingly. And he's also not enhanced by the Halo effect. And that's not to mention that he can't simply find another woman if things don't work out with this one, because he's unattractive. So even here, he simply won't be able to harm the same number of women as a hot guy. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 03/11/25 09:39 PM |
| 1 | When People Say "Confidence" Is The Most Important Thing for MenThe point is that true self-confidence is built solely on positive reinforcement. No pulling yourself up by your bootstraps or self-esteem—most often, it's all false and can even be harmful, leading to inflated self-esteem. This is what I consider normal/healthy self-esteem—one that's based on a person's real skills. The fact that adequate self-esteem is built on positive experience is a mechanism that stands out in the behavior of even animals and, of course, humans. And this is what has allowe… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 03/11/25 03:26 PM |
| 4 | This sub is an objectively bad example of what average men are like in real life because there’s over-representation of autistic/socially incompetent men here>There is someone for everyone. Nope. This assumes there are an exactly equal number of men and women, which is false. Biologically, there are 105 male births for every 100 female births. So some men are destined to be alone. Even if they all became supermodels, 5 out of every 105 men would still be fated to be alone. The only question is when and how these men would make the realization and how they would deal with the realization I agree with everything except that. Even in developed countries… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 03/11/25 11:26 AM |
| 3 | Most women aren't having sex as much as rp thinks.No, it's people like you who overestimate their quantity. I repeat, ALL studies show that men and women have an average, stable libido, and that women simply have a slightly lower and less pronounced libido (responsive attraction). Asexuals, aromantics, and others make up 1% of the population. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 02/11/25 03:18 PM |
| -1 | Most women aren't having sex as much as rp thinks.Demisexuals, asexuals, aromantics, and other people with altered attachment styles and sexual needs truly make up a couple percent of the general population. So please don't speak for the majority of women. If you don't have a desire for sex, then you... are a minority, and a total one at that. Don't confuse your own peculiarities with the responsive attraction of many women. Porn-sex 24/7? No, and even the RP doesn't talk about it; they simply talk about active attraction. It's funny that it's … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 02/11/25 01:05 PM |
| 4 | LOOKS WEEKLY DISCUSSION THREADOh, I didn't even think it could be him, even though his communication style is similar. I should have recognized him by his arrogant, stubborn style. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 02/11/25 10:43 AM |
| 1 | LOOKS WEEKLY DISCUSSION THREADI don't understand people like that either. Well, come on, you can just choose a look that suits them and makes them feel comfortable. It's the same with people who realize they're unattractive, but still wear the most unflattering and uncomfortable clothes. Why? You could look better, at least for yourself! It's basic self-care. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 02/11/25 10:40 AM |
| 4 | LOOKS WEEKLY DISCUSSION THREADI've thought about a lot of things, but it's definitely not that wanting to look good for your partner is a bad thing, lol | /r/PurplePillDebate | 02/11/25 10:36 AM |
| 6 | LOOKS WEEKLY DISCUSSION THREADYou'll be surprised, but... Yes, there are plenty of men who like it. My favorite thing about this is that you can go to any AI-powered girlfriend/boyfriend aggregator and see for yourself: there will be a lot of unconventionally attractive women at the top of the user list. As for male bots... Well, they're almost all the same. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 02/11/25 10:32 AM |
| 3 | I’m convinced that the only reason men want women to be more involved with fixing the “male loneliness epidemic” is because they genuinely do not care about one another’s problems. Thoughts?>My point is the narrative behind male loneliness is disingenuous. When women claim male loneliness all about men being sad they aren’t have sex/girlfriends, men turn around and insist that all of those other things listed (like friendship, being allowed to be vulnerable, finding purpose outside of dating, etc..) are just as important, but men show virtually no energy in fixing those aspects of their loneliness in proportion to how many men who are suffering. From what I've seen, it's women who … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/11/25 10:17 AM |
| 2 | It is not a parent’s job to teach their kids how to get laid.Unironically, I completely agree. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/11/25 09:59 AM |
| 2 | I’m convinced that the only reason men want women to be more involved with fixing the “male loneliness epidemic” is because they genuinely do not care about one another’s problems. Thoughts?>Would having female advocates be nice? Sure. But there are so many aspects of male loneliness that don’t require women to solve. For a heterosexual man, only a woman can help resolve the romantic aspect of loneliness. For a gay man, other men can, of course, also resolve this. >What about the making friends part? What about being able to open up about your feelings and be vulnerable part? What about the finding purpose beyond dating part? All these points completely distract men from the romant… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/11/25 09:55 AM |
| -1 | CMV: There's nothing for women in traditionalism>Feminist women have 0 issues finding husbands as long as they play their cards right. >The dating market in the Western world is so skewed in favor of women that even pornstars can find husbands as long as they play their cards right >Manipulating a guy is ridiculously easy. Most men just want you to stroke their ego and pretend to be vulnerable and that's it. They will be your slave forever. It's great that you wrote this yourself. So you understand perfectly well that nothing falls into the l… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/11/25 09:37 AM |
| 1 | Attracting women and being a good partner require different skillsetsYep, I did say that they have one circular relationship and also be successful in it, or just being successful if they want something casual. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 31/10/25 02:54 PM |
| 1 | Attracting women and being a good partner require different skillsetsI probably don't understand everything, but I've already said everything I wanted, so you can just reread my comments. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 31/10/25 02:51 PM |
| 2 | Attracting women and being a good partner require different skillsetsSo you just wrote a wall of text to try to argue with me when I simply used the phrase "drowning in pussy" as an indication that these guys still have a queue of women wanting everything from them, sex and relationships? Yet you gave examples of guys who are most likely unattractive and who coerce women into sex through manipulation and various psychoactive substances, when that's not what we're talking about. And the funniest thing is that you also gave an example of how women behave absolutely… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 31/10/25 02:49 PM |
| 1 | Attracting women and being a good partner require different skillsetsWhich of them will be more successful?... I don't think anyone will; they'll be roughly equal. So, you didn't see that I answered your question with the first sentence and then just expanded on it.... Okay. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 31/10/25 02:42 PM |
| 1 | Attracting women and being a good partner require different skillsetsWhich of them will be more successful?... I don't think anyone will; they'll be roughly equal. The only thing to note is that if a "kind and sympathetic" 9/10 guy wants a family and a long-term relationship, maintaining it will be slightly easier for him than for a rude guy. But they'll be equally likely to find it, and nothing prevents that rude guy from becoming a better person. And yet, comparing only 9/10 guys with each other wouldn't be entirely inaccurate in real life, because there's noth… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 31/10/25 02:22 PM |
| 3 | Attracting women and being a good partner require different skillsetsWhat?… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 31/10/25 01:59 PM |
| 3 | Attracting women and being a good partner require different skillsetsBecause his initial comment was about men confusing assertive flirting with aggression, to which I responded that no, they don't, and even aggression can easily be perceived by women not as a red flag. So such "confusion" isn't important. To which he began to justify it by saying that "good men drown in pussy too." | /r/PurplePillDebate | 31/10/25 01:59 PM |
| 4 | Attracting women and being a good partner require different skillsetsRather, this is a discovery for you, because it was you who wanted to justify that "non-aggressive men also drowning in pussy", ignoring the fact that being "nice" is still not the main factor | /r/PurplePillDebate | 31/10/25 01:49 PM |
| 3 | Attracting women and being a good partner require different skillsetsExactly, this looks like Jeffrey Boomhauer's method. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 31/10/25 01:31 PM |
| 5 | Attracting women and being a good partner require different skillsets>There’s plenty of non-abusive men drowning in pussy though. The point is, these men popular not because they don't beat women. It's because they're hot, one way or another. Being kind and sympathetic isn't a significant selection criterion at all; it's a nice bonus at best. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 31/10/25 01:30 PM |
| 5 | Attracting women and being a good partner require different skillsetsVery often, these men are truly awful and abusive. And again, this doesn't prevent them from being romantically/sexually successful. I thought we'd already gotten past this misconception after even "mature, experienced" women here admitted that they actually go for jerks if they have "redeeming qualities." If I had a dollar for every time I saw a rude man who actually abused women to the point of physical violence and bruises and still drown in pussy, I wouldn't pay for coffee at all. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 31/10/25 01:24 PM |
| 11 | Attracting women and being a good partner require different skillsets>Actually “bad partners” are guys who cycle through women endlessly. So a lot of this vitriol towards unsuccessful men is completely misguided Yes, to be honest. For the most part, a very large number of genuinely positive and good men remain on the sidelines because they don't bother women because they're polite. While louder and more rude men generally don't care about politeness and approach women without any concern. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 31/10/25 01:18 PM |
| 1 | Attracting women and being a good partner require different skillsetsI completely disagree with the last part; it's bad advice for building a long-term relationship. An ONS might work, but even a FWB can have problems (even if not as big - due to the lower emotional investment). But I largely agree with the rest, although I'm always surprised why women don't pay attention to the first period of initiation in their advice, as it's the most difficult. I once heard an older lady say that relationships are like a bicycle, and once you get going, it's much easier to m… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 31/10/25 01:14 PM |
| 9 | Any violant agenda or idealogy men subscribe to is entirely their faults and therefore responsibilityThe point isn't that someone is threatening someone with violence if they don't have sex. No, that's just a minority doing that. And this isn't absolving men of responsibility, but simply explaining the cause-and-effect relationship. For the most part, everyone who talks about this is more of a warning, because they themselves don't want violence and social unrest. But it just so happens that young, single men have historically been the most reactive group in the population, and that's simply a … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 30/10/25 02:13 PM |
| 1 | 20 year old women don't want middle aged or geriatric men the way these men want themThat's still a huge age gap. Especially considering that younger men also have fewer options when it comes to dating women because of this. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 30/10/25 02:05 PM |
| 1 | Red Pill advice surrounding the Male Loneliness Epidemic is confusing and badIn a platonic sense, yes, but not in a romantic sense. People's self-confidence is usually compartmentalized, and if someone is amazing at one thing, it's no guarantee they'll be good at something else. So why would they be super confident in an area where they're a failure? That's right, if they're not a narcissist, they'll be insecure. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 29/10/25 09:31 PM |
| 2 | A lot of criticism against TRP isn't because of self-improvement advice, it's because many RPers (mostly men but there's also a lot of women) have dogshit morals.But these men treat these women immorally, but they happily tolerate it. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 29/10/25 09:24 PM |
| – | In the case of being rejected by bad women, do you find "he dodged a bullet" sensible or would you still say he's better off being hit by the bullet?>Do you agree with this claim? If a guy gets rejected by a woman who thinks it's okay to drive drunk (or insert any red flag here), has he effectively dodged a bullet, and that if he had not been rejected his life would have been worse? Yes, it could be like that. But the main problem with the phrase "he/she dodged a bullet" is that it's used as a rather silly attempt to cheer up someone who's been rejected. Very often, the "bullet" was a very high-quality partner who simply didn't want the othe… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 29/10/25 09:23 PM |
| 27 | Red Pill advice surrounding the Male Loneliness Epidemic is confusing and badAs always, there's a clear misunderstanding that even amazing friends can't replace a romantic relationship. Absolutely not. No fishing group will ever replace romance and sex for anyone (which isn't wrong, as the desire for sex is common to most people on this planet). So even incredibly trusting, empathetic men between men and men or women and women can't replace romance. That's precisely why men logically and correctly turn to women, because for a heterosexual man, only a woman can solve this… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 29/10/25 09:19 PM |
| 2 | A lot of criticism against TRP isn't because of self-improvement advice, it's because many RPers (mostly men but there's also a lot of women) have dogshit morals.But they're quite willing to tolerate immoral behavior for the sake of certain things. We've already been through this, when a colossal number of women here claimed they dated obviously bad men only because those men had qualities that compensated for their moral ugliness. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 29/10/25 09:11 PM |
| 2 | A lot of criticism against TRP isn't because of self-improvement advice, it's because many RPers (mostly men but there's also a lot of women) have dogshit morals.I agree that after all the preliminary stages and at the stage of a serious relationship, good morals and compatibility are needed. I agree. But that's the point, it's after all the previous stages. And morals have a very weak effect on attraction, to put it mildly. Otherwise, even the "selfish" nice guys would still get a positive experience, but they don't. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 29/10/25 09:08 PM |
| 2 | A lot of criticism against TRP isn't because of self-improvement advice, it's because many RPers (mostly men but there's also a lot of women) have dogshit morals.No, that means morality should be rewarded. And if that's not the case... Well, that's the world we live in now. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 29/10/25 09:06 PM |
| 0 | A lot of criticism against TRP isn't because of self-improvement advice, it's because many RPers (mostly men but there's also a lot of women) have dogshit morals.The point is that moral well-being should be "rewarded" by success in life. This isn't the case now, but if it were... It would be wonderful. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 29/10/25 09:04 PM |
| 6 | A lot of criticism against TRP isn't because of self-improvement advice, it's because many RPers (mostly men but there's also a lot of women) have dogshit morals.Considering what you're saying about men, I don't quite agree. It's not personal, but just look at your ideas from an outside perspective, or have someone you don't know very well review them (to avoid personal bias). And yes, "nice guys" are still morally superior to the vast majority of manipulative fuckboys, but as we can see, this doesn't greatly influence their success. You don't have to be selfishly "good" for it to matter and make you stand out in the partner selection process. But as we … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 29/10/25 03:22 PM |
| 6 | A lot of criticism against TRP isn't because of self-improvement advice, it's because many RPers (mostly men but there's also a lot of women) have dogshit morals.Then morality should be one of the central criteria for selecting a partner. But that's not the case, and therefore you're wrong. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 29/10/25 03:16 PM |
| 9 | A lot of criticism against TRP isn't because of self-improvement advice, it's because many RPers (mostly men but there's also a lot of women) have dogshit morals.No, and that's insincere, and you know it. And you, like many other BluePers, constantly denigrated morally good men as "nice guys." Make or convince women to make morality their primary criterion for choosing a partner. Then we'll talk. Oh, you can't? Well then, be quiet and don't blame men for wanting to avoid dying alone and miserable. Or at least admit that you hate them and don't pretend you're somehow morally superior to any RPer. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 29/10/25 03:00 PM |
| 9 | A lot of criticism against TRP isn't because of self-improvement advice, it's because many RPers (mostly men but there's also a lot of women) have dogshit morals.This is what many so-called Blue Pill say. To simply see this, go to any post made over the last five years that discusses sexually/romantically unsuccessful guys, nice guys, etc., and you'll see that they never pay attention to flirting, physical qualities, etc., only morality. And there are also numerous resources like "Not How Girls Work," where there's also a constant theme that something is wrong with unsuccessful men precisely because of their morals and that "they don't see women as peopl… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 29/10/25 02:01 PM |
| 12 | A lot of criticism against TRP isn't because of self-improvement advice, it's because many RPers (mostly men but there's also a lot of women) have dogshit morals.Exactly, so morality has absolutely no bearing. So your post is invalid even here. Oh, and don't bring up the idea that "it's always obvious that attractive people are popular." No, that's not true. There are still plenty of people who consider anyone who has any trouble finding a relationship to be that way precisely because of their poor morals. And if you'd said that "attractiveness is obviously undeniable," you would have been called a RP not long ago. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 29/10/25 01:51 PM |
| 17 | A lot of criticism against TRP isn't because of self-improvement advice, it's because many RPers (mostly men but there's also a lot of women) have dogshit morals.From what I see, most RPers were genuinely good people for a long time, starting back in childhood. And where did that lead them? Oh, right - nowhere good. So it's best not to bring morality into this, because it's in no way connected to and doesn't affect sexual or romantic attraction, or even social attraction. And yes, please don't spout nonsense about "all RPers' advice being common knowledge" - no, it's not, and even here, relatively recently, people like you have started appearing who say,… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 29/10/25 01:40 PM |
| 15 | What piss you or please you the most about dating and male-female dynamics?I guess I don't like that many people date multiple people at once in the early stages. Even the fact that they do this to "not put all their eggs in one basket" seems to indicate that this approach prevents them from focusing on someone specific and falling in love. And they know that It also follows that many women believe that men "have to compete" for them as options. This is a highly transactional way to think, and thankfully, I've been lucky enough to avoid it so far. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 29/10/25 01:18 PM |
| 1 | 20 year old women don't want middle aged or geriatric men the way these men want themYeah, I've seen that too. Damn it, I'm going through the same thing myself now, when younger girls are perfectly willing to hang out with me. And damn, I'm not even 30 yet | /r/PurplePillDebate | 29/10/25 01:14 PM |
| -1 | 20 year old women don't want middle aged or geriatric men the way these men want themAnd yet, somehow, magically, the average man in a relationship is older than the woman. Yes, not by 10-20 years, but even by 5 very often. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 29/10/25 01:03 PM |
| 2 | N COUNTS WEEKLY DISCUSSION THREADEvery single dude who complains about n count would fuck if a 10/10 high n woman was super into them. You kind of proved that n-count is important, because here it clearly compensates. I always found these weird takes funny: "Oh, oh, I know a promiscuous woman who got married successfully and everything is fine, but she still sucks her husband's soul through his penis... But that's not important! Because it means men don't care about n-count!" | /r/PurplePillDebate | 29/10/25 07:35 AM |
| 2 | N COUNTS WEEKLY DISCUSSION THREADMutual🤝 | /r/PurplePillDebate | 27/10/25 05:01 PM |
| 2 | N COUNTS WEEKLY DISCUSSION THREADAt least more than you. But that's a low bar. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 27/10/25 04:44 PM |
| 2 | Your "league" is what can be expected given your attributes, not what you can get>I believe that "leagues" are a theoretical construct that simply represents what one can expect in the market given one's attributes, assuming an even gender ratio and perfect competition with many "buyers and sellers". In the real world, markets are imperfect, and we don't have unlimited options. Additionally, more information about someone might make them more desirable than what their "stats" might imply. I agree with you on many things, but does that mean you have universal characteristics … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 27/10/25 03:03 PM |
| 1 | N COUNTS WEEKLY DISCUSSION THREADThen I agree here. I myself adhere to this, and although I have had opportunities to engage in casual , I avoid it and seek a similar kind of person. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 27/10/25 11:08 AM |
| 1 | N COUNTS WEEKLY DISCUSSION THREADexcept theyre not upset at “their crush fucking other people”, theyre upset a girl fucked other people before meeting them It doesn't change anything at all, even if it happened in the past, especially if it's recent (there's a difference between events that happened a month ago and 10 years ago). Even those who supposedly don't have problems with N-counts and so on, for some reason, still don't often want to delve into their partner's past, and they also don't like talking about it, especially … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 27/10/25 10:48 AM |
| 1 | N COUNTS WEEKLY DISCUSSION THREADThere's nothing wrong with someone using research to choose a partner. This doesn't mean that only research results are important and personal experience is unimportant. NO. The point is that research justifies and explains one's choice. When most people choose drinking water, they don't conduct a full chemical analysis, electrolytes, and everything else. No, the initial choice of water is based on its organoleptic qualities, simply on taste. But of course, if a person later sees information tha… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 27/10/25 08:56 AM |
| 1 | N COUNTS WEEKLY DISCUSSION THREADThere's no point in asking, "How do you know their n-count? They could just lie." They can lie about anything, so it's pointless to try to use this as an argument. It's just as pointless to have any conversation with anyone, because they could just lie. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 27/10/25 08:35 AM |
| 2 | N COUNTS WEEKLY DISCUSSION THREADDo people like it when someone they appreciate does nice things for them and not for other people?!😭 What inconsistent logic! They should be happy when their crush fucks other people, and even better when she does it right in front of them. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 27/10/25 08:32 AM |
| -1 | Women don't have better emotional intelligence then men.Of course, as you'd like to think, I'm not against giving in here for your peace of mind. But in the future, at least try to use short break to avoid abusing your moderator power and deleting comments you don't like. Otherwise, it's a bit rude. . P.S. To prove I was lying, she literally found a month-old comment where she wrote what I was referring to. About she that time drank at the wedding and therefore was not in her right mind. And at the same time, she actively belittled and vilified the e… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 23/10/25 06:17 PM |
| -1 | Women don't have better emotional intelligence then men.Of course, if that's what you want to think. I thought you were logical and understood that people who constantly have casual sex will change partners frequently. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 23/10/25 06:14 PM |
| – | Women don't have better emotional intelligence then men.Have a nice rest after drinking | /r/PurplePillDebate | 23/10/25 06:05 PM |
| -1 | Women don't have better emotional intelligence then men.Of course, you can continue insulting me and keep writing hodgepodge. The last time you behaved like this here, you were drunk (I think from your words), so I'll just leave you to rest and not respond further. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 23/10/25 06:04 PM |
| 0 | Women don't have better emotional intelligence then men.This doesn't really answer my comment and looks like a hodgepodge.… >I meant exactly what I wrote. Males are more callous and illogically assume that there isn’t a logic to consideration. They feel their mindset (that aligns more to “psychopathy” and empathy-deviodness than a female mindset does) is a virtue. You prove that out and so does this individual. Of course, just like I wrote that this is nonsense and has no basis. And yes, it's also against the rules of this subreddit and offensive, bu… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 23/10/25 06:00 PM |
| 0 | Women don't have better emotional intelligence then men.>Fine with me, as a man with a high N-count, I would agree that someone who fucks is someone who likes to fuck, and will probably continue wanting to fuck. Of course, that's exactly it, and if these people changed partners like gloves, then they will do so in the future too. Glad we agree here. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 23/10/25 05:55 PM |
| -1 | Women don't have better emotional intelligence then men.>Lmaoo I’m cracking up because I knew one of you was going to comment with “but but but women have sexual pasts!” Of course, because it's logical >I take issue with a pattern of a man CHEATING. >Not a pattern of a man having sex when single. >So feel free to “save my comments”! Thanks for the permission. I'll definitely keep this as an acknowledgment that a person's past behavior is a potential predictor of future behavior. Glad we agree here. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 23/10/25 05:54 PM |
| 0 | Women don't have better emotional intelligence then men.>The flip-side of this is male’s higher propensity for inconsideration, sociopathy, and an inability to apply empathy (likely baked in some pathological self-centeredness). And the only thing that's true is that men have a higher level of psychopathy, although given that psychopaths are 1% of the population, they're trying to equate this to all men... Not entirely relevant. >And that can all be fine and dandy and have some evolutionary value, but men can’t complain about feeling “lonely” and “is… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 23/10/25 03:55 PM |
| 2 | Women don't have better emotional intelligence then men.I'll definitely be saving the comments from both of you to use next time I see you in the n-count thread. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 23/10/25 03:51 PM |
| 1 | Women don't have better emotional intelligence then men.Yep, women are actually slightly better emotionally on average, but that doesn't change anything. Many people here are simply trying to say that high female neuroticism is a good thing - but it is not and that's the main mistake. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 23/10/25 06:33 AM |
| 3 | Women don't have better emotional intelligence then men.You're slightly mistaken here. While studies do show that women have higher EQ on average, but that's all. The problem here is that many BlueP men and women misinterpret this. This doesn't mean that women are somehow better than men, or even that women are less aggressive than men. It only means that women are more cowardly (which is normal) and, as a result, have acquired, on average, a keener social awareness to avoid danger from men (who are, on average, stronger). However, this doesn't preve… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 23/10/25 06:23 AM |
| 2 | Low status men like high status men are their allies but but they are notWomen compete too. And they do so within their own class and level, not against those below them. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 23/10/25 06:06 AM |
| 1 | Low status men like high status men are their allies but but they are notBecause this is most likely fanfiction. Because if he were in the same situation as she says, he shouldn't be constantly competing with the poor in his head. Or if it's true, it makes the situation even funnier because she's simply bragging about her money (which isn't even that huge) and doesn't understand that it doesn't necessarily mean power. Which, in fact, shows that this is all fanfiction. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 23/10/25 06:02 AM |
| 2 | Low status men like high status men are their allies but but they are notHonestly, this post smells like fan fiction to me or like a poor attempt at bragging. Because men understand the existing financial inequality perfectly well, unlike those left-wing women who often make mistakes here. And here's where your fan fiction begins. If your husband were truly so rich (which doesn't mean influential; in fact, he has even less power and opportunities than a poor man) and conscientious, he wouldn't care about those below him in the first place. The one on top isn't really… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 23/10/25 05:56 AM |
| 2 | What do you think about talking to multiple people all day and even planning different dates during the early stages?We understand metaphors and analogies perfectly well. It’s about you… You simply don't understand that treating the dating process like an interview is inherently problematic. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 23/10/25 05:45 AM |
| 2 | What do you think about talking to multiple people all day and even planning different dates during the early stages?Forget it, dude, some people have a hard time understanding that relationships shouldn't be so transactional that they can be compared to job. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 22/10/25 08:57 PM |
| – | DISCUSSION🗨️ ABOUT MAIN PPD POSTS📮, LOOKS👀, AND N-COUNT🔢 ARE RESTRICTED🚫 FROM THE DAILY🌞 MEGATHREAD🧵I was more talking about places like TwoX or AskFeminists.... Although you can certainly say that all the women there are fake and there are no feminists at all, that's your right. But… And even those feminists whom I saw in real life did not inspire confidence in me. So, of course, you can continue to live in that bubble of "wonderful feminists in your life," but just remember that they are a minority. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 22/10/25 08:49 PM |
| – | DISCUSSION🗨️ ABOUT MAIN PPD POSTS📮, LOOKS👀, AND N-COUNT🔢 ARE RESTRICTED🚫 FROM THE DAILY🌞 MEGATHREAD🧵>No you haven't, you are just sharing the worst of the worst between like-minded men and thinking this justifies not actually trying to understand what it's about This is all your fan fiction, unfortunately. And to dispel them, it's enough to visit any online space for women—Reddit is full of them. And yes, these are real women, and there are at least tens of millions of them in various communities. No number of "terrible misogynists" is simply comparable >Imagine judging any group by their wors… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 22/10/25 02:14 PM |
| – | DISCUSSION🗨️ ABOUT MAIN PPD POSTS📮, LOOKS👀, AND N-COUNT🔢 ARE RESTRICTED🚫 FROM THE DAILY🌞 MEGATHREAD🧵>"You don't need to know about something to criticize it" is not a take that makes you go far in life In fact, this will really help you move forward and be more successful. Because you need to look at what people actually do, not just say. Being overly trusting doesn't work well, even for children. >Again with learning about feminists from what men say instead of learning from actual feminists, if you had read some you'd know how feminists actually feel about that Of course, I and many other me… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 22/10/25 05:30 AM |
| 5 | DISCUSSION🗨️ ABOUT MAIN PPD POSTS📮, LOOKS👀, AND N-COUNT🔢 ARE RESTRICTED🚫 FROM THE DAILY🌞 MEGATHREAD🧵You don't need to taste shit to know it's not worth eating. And especially since many liberal women just as perfectly repeat the tenets of radical feminism, and if you don't see it, I have questions for you, because it's hard to miss, especially online. "Scientific social articles" about feminism or books about it mean absolutely nothing because radical feminists don't act on them, so this literature can be considered, at best, fiction. The problem is that sensible feminists do nothing against t… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/10/25 07:29 PM |
| 2 | CMV: Western men need to take accountability for the terrible behavior of many western women>Lotta downvotes, not a lot of counterarguments. I accept your implicit concessions. There's a lot of this here, get used to it. Not all of them even finished reading your argument. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/10/25 03:11 AM |
| 9 | Men are cooked, new study shows men are the ones with the biological clock, not women.- A link to a video from a channel with a name and content that promotes misandry and doesn't even hide it. - Ignoring that sperm degradation is a topic that has never been hidden. - While also completely ignoring that women's problems with age and fertility are much more profound and detrimental to both mother and fetus, especially not only due to fertilization issues but also to intrauterine development, which is a purely female problem for obvious reasons. Fathers are not directly at risk in … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 20/10/25 08:43 PM |
| 1 | What’s up with some of the men on this sub conflating attractiveness with being a shitty person?There are several reasons. The halo effect and how strongly it influences how people perceive someone's actions based on their appearance. It's fairly easy to understand that attractive people are initially treated better and their actions (even controversial or negative ones, which can be perceived positively) are viewed more favorably. 2) The fact that "personality" in a moral sense plays a very, very weak role in choosing a partner. I and others have posted here many times on these topics, wh… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 20/10/25 05:59 AM |
| 1 | What’s up with some of the men on this sub conflating attractiveness with being a shitty person?There are several reasons. 1) The halo effect and how strongly it influences how people perceive someone's actions based on their appearance. It's fairly easy to understand that attractive people are initially treated better and their actions (even controversial or negative ones, which can be perceived positively) are viewed more favorably. 2) The fact that "personality" in a moral sense plays a very, very weak role in choosing a partner. I and others have posted here many times on these topics,… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 20/10/25 05:28 AM |
| 8 | Question for women: How can a man who's not able to get casual sex, pursue a serious relationship with a woman who did have casual sex with other men?>Also if they’re having sex with you, they’re attracted to you. Couldn't be further from the truth. It's like telling a woman, "If he wants to fuck you, he's already completely in love with you." | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/10/25 05:39 AM |
| 10 | Question for women: How can a man who's not able to get casual sex, pursue a serious relationship with a woman who did have casual sex with other men?You won't get an honest and necessary answer to this question here. Most women will say it doesn't matter even if he couldn't get casual sex from this girl, even if all this directly indicates that no girl, not even this one, finds this man hot. It can't be that this man's type is so unique that only she in the whole world will be favorable to him. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/10/25 05:38 AM |
| 9 | Question for women: How can a man who's not able to get casual sex, pursue a serious relationship with a woman who did have casual sex with other men?>And if she's not having casual sex with you, it doesn't have anything to do with looks or attraction or any of that. It very well could be that you are not on her radar for that. That may indeed be true, but he's also not on the radar of any woman who engages in casual sex. And if we give her the benefit of the doubt that he's her type, then there SHOULD be women who share her type. That is, this man should have at least some chance of casual sex, simply statistically, if he's even remotely att… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/10/25 05:33 AM |
| 0 | The fact that men are more lustful towards women is not actually a disadvantage but an advantage for women.Please don't start. Men and women have their own problems, but men's problems are far worse. You should understand (as I also wrote in the OP) that men still need to pay attention to the ENTIRE spectrum of verification, as they can't be sure of anything, neither of a woman's sexual nor romantic commitment. Whereas women are at least confident of sexual commitment from the start. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 16/10/25 06:48 AM |
| 0 | How exactly is the average Basic Bob supposed to "choose better" in terms of MARRIAGE?>Average men aren't neurotic, inexperienced, jealous, and controlling The problem is that these are all objective indicators that can't even be measured or categorized. It's you (and liberal women) who consider him this way from your perspective, and you have the right to do so. But that's just your opinion. Meanwhile, measurable indicators indicate that he's clearly not below average. >And in America, the average man is overweight; is over 30; and isn't college-educated Yes, indeed, thank you f… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 16/10/25 06:45 AM |
| -2 | How exactly is the average Basic Bob supposed to "choose better" in terms of MARRIAGE?Basic Bob is still average, whether you like it or not. Just like his female counterpart, she's also average. Especially considering that most Americans would be worse off than this man or woman in terms of weight, wealth, and background. I'm afraid they could even be considered above average. And If we were to take global indicators here, then Bob could get into the top only judging by the finances, but that would be unfair. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 16/10/25 04:39 AM |
| 0 | The fact that men are more lustful towards women is not actually a disadvantage but an advantage for women.You basically repeated my post without arguing anything, and even repeated the last paragraph... Where it was clearly explained that women still have an easier time choosing a partner than men, due to the lesser need to select based on sexual attraction and the opportunity to devote more time to personal compatibility, since most men are already attracted to women by default. So no, women and men are definitely not "both struggling the same." | /r/PurplePillDebate | 16/10/25 04:30 AM |
| -2 | The fact that men are more lustful towards women is not actually a disadvantage but an advantage for women.If a woman (who is supposedly straight) experiences male attention as straight men experience gay men attention...then this woman is not straight. Another stupid analogy won't work here. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 16/10/25 04:21 AM |
| 1 | The fact that men are more lustful towards women is not actually a disadvantage but an advantage for women.Attempting to attribute something to someone they didn't say and then doubling down on it is the definition of lies and slander. Especially when there's no reason to call me out, when you're doing it for something you made up yourself. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/10/25 02:59 PM |
| 1 | The fact that men are more lustful towards women is not actually a disadvantage but an advantage for women.And almost all of this does not correspond to reality. Because women are still considered physically weaker and are treated more leniently. For example, they are allowed to hit men without restraint (which is even a "humorous trope"), to engage in conflicts, and to provoke them themselves. However, men are forbidden from responding to their actions, which is right, because men are stronger than women. But at the same time, this gives women free rein. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/10/25 02:54 PM |
| -7 | The fact that men are more lustful towards women is not actually a disadvantage but an advantage for women.Which doesn't work, and you know it. After all, I was responding to someone who asked how what I wrote would help them select a partner. So, if we were to go with your financial analogy, you could say, for example, that a millionaire is constantly pestered by various small companies that need his investment. So he already understands that all these companies really need him and that this isn't some kind of competitor's ploy, so he can vet these startups and find the most important ones. But the … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/10/25 02:51 PM |
| 1 | The fact that men are more lustful towards women is not actually a disadvantage but an advantage for women.What do you mean? I wrote that in this case, women have more time to choose a higher-quality (and therefore safer) partner, because they need to spend less time investigating whether the man they're dating is attracted to them. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/10/25 02:46 PM |
| 1 | The fact that men are more lustful towards women is not actually a disadvantage but an advantage for women.I'm sorry that you live in such a terrible world. But this doesn't apply to the Western world. And in the non-Western world, too, even where women are treated like objects (which is disgusting and I condemn it), there's still no permanence in which someone has the right to harm "someone else's thing." | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/10/25 02:43 PM |
| -7 | The fact that men are more lustful towards women is not actually a disadvantage but an advantage for women.Why are 1,000 people asking you for money? Are you that rich? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/10/25 02:38 PM |
| 1 | The fact that men are more lustful towards women is not actually a disadvantage but an advantage for women.That's probably why you're better at making jokes than at actually wanting to read a post and actually respond to it. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/10/25 01:31 PM |
| 3 | The fact that men are more lustful towards women is not actually a disadvantage but an advantage for women.And you'll be able to simply double-check whether he really likes you as a person. You'll even have more time for this, since you won't have to overly check whether he's attracted to you. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/10/25 01:29 PM |
| – | The fact that men are more lustful towards women is not actually a disadvantage but an advantage for women.Well, you weren't banned for constant lying and insults. So I'm sure I would have been fine too. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/10/25 01:27 PM |
| 1 | The fact that men are more lustful towards women is not actually a disadvantage but an advantage for women.I can say the same about you. Try your gaslighting elsewhere, not here. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/10/25 12:39 PM |
| 0 | The fact that men are more lustful towards women is not actually a disadvantage but an advantage for women.>I've yet to meet a single woman who doesn't have a SH/SA story, and the statistics reflect that. >The perpetrators are overwhelmingly men. As you wish | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/10/25 11:56 AM |
| – | The fact that men are more lustful towards women is not actually a disadvantage but an advantage for women.This is called making up bullshit and playing with it instead of a real position. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/10/25 11:54 AM |
| – | The fact that men are more lustful towards women is not actually a disadvantage but an advantage for women.Read my OP again and don't make up bullshit. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/10/25 11:35 AM |
| -2 | The fact that men are more lustful towards women is not actually a disadvantage but an advantage for women.These are my emotions because I have to explain to you that men are not rapists, no matter how much you would like to. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/10/25 11:35 AM |
| -6 | The fact that men are more lustful towards women is not actually a disadvantage but an advantage for women.It seems that you are the one who doesn't understand the difference here🤷♂️ >Still enough for my answer to point one to stand. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/10/25 11:06 AM |
| – | The fact that men are more lustful towards women is not actually a disadvantage but an advantage for women.Translation for first-grade school: "If more people want to fuck you, it increases the pool of people you can choose from, and also allows you to no longer worry about them not wanting you sexually. And you can devote more time to other selection criteria, such as personality." | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/10/25 11:03 AM |
| 1 | The fact that men are more lustful towards women is not actually a disadvantage but an advantage for women.Some men have zero women who want to fuck them. Or they do, but they want to fuck them not for their bodies or sexuality, but for the sake of a transaction or something else. I wrote this in my OP. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/10/25 11:01 AM |
| -7 | The fact that men are more lustful towards women is not actually a disadvantage but an advantage for women.>I've yet to meet a single woman who doesn't have SH/SA story, and the statistics reflect that. >The perpetrators are overwhelmingly men. >Still enough for my answer to point one to stand. Literally every one of these points contradicts this: >Nobody said that. Strawman Well, okay, I'm not surprised. And now I won’t even repeat that not all women become women of violent crimes (especially real ones, and not: “I woke up the morning after the ONS and decided that I was raped”), that rapists among … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/10/25 10:59 AM |
| -6 | The fact that men are more lustful towards women is not actually a disadvantage but an advantage for women.Another person who didn't ask for a post, so I'll just answer briefly. >why do I care that a 1000 men want to fuck me when I wouldn't want to fuck 990 of them? Because thanks to that privilege I'm talking about, you'll also have to worry about those 10 men you want to fuck wanting you back. P.S. People who downvote, instead of this better - use basic math. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/10/25 10:46 AM |
| 2 | The fact that men are more lustful towards women is not actually a disadvantage but an advantage for women.I would say no, this is the mainstream position. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/10/25 09:38 AM |
| -9 | The fact that men are more lustful towards women is not actually a disadvantage but an advantage for women.1) Not all women are subjected to violence. 2) Not all of these women are subjected to violence by men. 3) Not all men are inherently rapists, aggressors, etc. 4) Even among the men who are terrible, a minority are those who attack random women. 5) The overwhelming majority of crime victims in all categories are men. 6) If you draw the card that says "men primarily attack other men!", this completely negates any argument you might have about women being victims, because it means violence is not … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/10/25 09:37 AM |
| 5 | The fact that men are more lustful towards women is not actually a disadvantage but an advantage for women.Yeah, all the time. Even here, there are a lot of people who say that. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/10/25 09:32 AM |
| 1 | The fact that men are more lustful towards women is not actually a disadvantage but an advantage for women.Under yesterday's other post, many people were very surprised by this and they argued with it. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/10/25 09:32 AM |
| 0 | The fact that men are more lustful towards women is not actually a disadvantage but an advantage for women.Next time, read the post first before replying. «Yes, not all women enjoy casual sex or heightened sexual attention, and that's understandable and respectable.Just as not all women like increased sexual attention to them from adolescence.» «But this also means that, on average, women don't need to worry about sexual selection in a partner, in the sense that, by default, a man will more often than not sexually desire a woman. Therefore, a woman can focus more on selecting a partner based on perso… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/10/25 09:31 AM |
| 1 | The fact that men are more lustful towards women is not actually a disadvantage but an advantage for women.🤝 | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/10/25 09:28 AM |
| 1 | The fact that men are more lustful towards women is not actually a disadvantage but an advantage for women.Sort of yes | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/10/25 09:28 AM |
| 2 | The fact that men are more lustful towards women is not actually a disadvantage but an advantage for women.There are a lot of women. Here too. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/10/25 07:14 AM |
| -1 | The fact that men are more lustful towards women is not actually a disadvantage but an advantage for women.And yet you understood everything perfectly. But I'll correct it if you're so pedantic. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/10/25 07:13 AM |
| 1 | The fact that men are more lustful towards women is not actually a disadvantage but an advantage for women.In what sense? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/10/25 07:12 AM |
| 3 | N COUNTS WEEKLY DISCUSSION THREADI'm always amused by some people's misunderstanding of why promiscuous men are viewed more positively than promiscuous women. Even if women and some studies show that women aren't particularly attracted to promiscuous men (which I can believe), these men still have sex, make friends, have relationships, and so on. And all because they are judged more attractively, and because being a sexually attractive, active man is significantly harder than being a sexually attractive, active woman. People wi… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/10/25 09:34 AM |
| 3 | Being a 20+ year old virgin is reasonably seen as a red flag for a potential mate and that is not virgin shamingIf you're going to say that women can pursue men (which happened to me), you need to clarify that it happens much less frequently. You don't think it happens every time, actively, or like many women do: "I looked at him for 10 seconds and blinked three times. He should see that signal and come to me!" | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/10/25 05:21 AM |
| 1 | Being a 20+ year old virgin is reasonably seen as a red flag for a potential mate and that is not virgin shamingOf course, this is a general statement, but you yourself said that it's more often the case than the other way. My first experiences were also all about girls making the first move, and that's how I slept with them for the first time, too. But I can understand that this isn't the typical experience for men, and of those I know, very few have had this experience. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/10/25 05:16 AM |
| 1 | Being a 20+ year old virgin is reasonably seen as a red flag for a potential mate and that is not virgin shamingI mean, for a man to remain single, he doesn't need to do anything that would be considered a red flag; he just needs to exist. And this (simply existing without activity) can be forgiven by women and will be appreciated more than chasing every skirt. It can even become a sign of exclusivity and standards that a man has, which can work to the advantage of even a virgin, even if he doesn't reveal himself, even clumsily. This works, according to the experience of late bloomers , who lose their vir… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/10/25 05:10 AM |
| 0 | Being a 20+ year old virgin is reasonably seen as a red flag for a potential mate and that is not virgin shaming>Something about you has made every other women turn away or deny your pursuits up to that point. If you were a man (which I now doubt), you'd immediately realize this is a stupid argument. After all, women don't pursue men, so all a man has to do to remain romantically alone is simply exist. It doesn't need to be anything vile or illegal; men, on average, are simply not that attractive to women. Even BlueP doesn't argue with that. >OR, you have chosen to not pursue any woman up till now, and th… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 13/10/25 08:25 PM |
| 2 | Men who dated "experienced" women, how do you deal with the fact that your partner likely hooked up with guys hotter than you?To begin with, I try not to date such women, but if fate decrees it so... The main thing is that I truly see her attraction to me. I'm far from ugly or handsome; I'd rate myself somewhere around a 6-7 (since I've had women approach me), so the simple fact that she couldn't keep her hands off me is enough. The main reason many men have this sexual insecurity is that these women simply don't show them their desire—and naturally, these men develop doubts about their relationships—something any ment… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 13/10/25 05:36 AM |
| 1 | Men who dated "experienced" women, how do you deal with the fact that your partner likely hooked up with guys hotter than you?I completely agree with you if you're talking about this woman genuinely wanting sex. Or sex and a relationship. But certainly not just a relationship; they don't show that she views the man sexually, or even romantically or transactionally. And the men you mention understand this—desiring sex is good, sex and a relationship is honorable, but just a relationship... Not always. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 13/10/25 05:17 AM |
| 1 | N COUNTS WEEKLY DISCUSSION THREADWhen someone says that "women and men with a high N-count cheat more often," this doesn't mean the likelihood of cheating is 100%. When someone says that "women with a high N-count compare their exes with each other and there's no way to create a better sex/relationship for them," this doesn't mean that literally all of them do this. When someone says that "pair bonds exist and you can be an alpha widow/widower," this doesn't mean that literally everyone in the world forms a very strong bond wit… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/10/25 07:50 AM |
| 0 | Men have to take responsibility for feminism>You mean how countries are mostly led by men? Yeah, this is why we still need feminism. Great point. No feminist ever pretended the fight was over. Regarding male leaders, yes, if we're talking about the highest level, they're the majority there... But at all other levels (even ministerial ones), women have no problems at all...So it’s not like feminists have anywhere else to work here, except to improve the qualifications of female politicians so that they can actually compete But I'm more say… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/10/25 12:48 PM |
| 3 | We are going back to our uncivilized days in dating and it isn't great for societyI do agree that modern dating is often piece of shit. But don't drag history into this, especially not the Neolithic period and earlier. There's NO evidence of alpha males, but there is evidence of serial monogamy. Those bullshit studies that claim "only a minority of men reproduced" don't take into account infant mortality, the overall male mortality rate (which is higher than that of women), migration, interbreeding (with Neanderthals in Europe, for example), or the fact that women were more l… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/10/25 09:49 AM |
| -3 | Men have to take responsibility for feminism>But you want to "tame" women again? Good fucking luck lol. Like they will let you do this.Or like all other men will let you do this. >Especially now that we have firearms that require no physical strength to wield. Especially when you look at the physical shape of most men dreaming about such a gender war. I don't even support the OP, but this is a gigantic fantasy about women's strength and a complete misunderstanding of the real world, lol We need to live in a reality where men are still the… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/10/25 09:36 AM |
| 2 | Why is big size so sexualized compared to other sizes?Yeah, I would have expected that. Otherwise, there must be an explanation for why it's big dicks and not small ones that are fetishized. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 09/10/25 07:17 AM |
| 2 | Why is big size so sexualized compared to other sizes?Our society fetishizes penises not because of men's reactions, but because of their attractiveness to women. Men don't care, but other people's flesh is a sexual attraction, if they're straight, of course. And I doubt that humiliation of small penises is rare. After all, there's "small dick energy" and other insults aimed at sexually insecure men. Also, while larger breasts may be considered better on average, they're not constantly sexualized. Small and average breasts still have more than enou… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 09/10/25 07:16 AM |
| 2 | Why is big size so sexualized compared to other sizes?It's a bit of a catch-22. Because small and medium-sized penises aren't often fetishized, and if they are, it's in a derogatory manner, men are very wary of women's compliments on this topic. Even in the example you gave, the woman is comparing her partner's average penis to her ex-boyfriend's big penis in the context of a comparison that already requires comparison. And not that she likes the average penis specifically because of its characteristics, not because of the comparison. And the same … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 09/10/25 07:08 AM |
| 4 | Why is big size so sexualized compared to other sizes?But small breasts are still fetishized, not in a derogatory context, and disproportionately more often than small penises. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 09/10/25 07:01 AM |
| 3 | Why is big size so sexualized compared to other sizes?But small breasts are still fetishized. And not in the context of humiliation, like small penises. And it's unclear to me why those women who sexualize men's bodies focus specifically on large penises, while there aren't as many women who prefer smaller ones. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 09/10/25 06:37 AM |
| 2 | Why is big size so sexualized compared to other sizes?But again, those women who do fetishize penises concentrate on the big ones, while the medium and small ones are pushed aside or even humiliated. I agree that this minority is a "size queen." But it's unclear why there aren't anyone who likes smaller options. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 09/10/25 06:35 AM |
| 2 | Why is big size so sexualized compared to other sizes?That's the question. It's not just large breasts (although they're larger) that are fetishized, but small ones as well. The same goes for body type, height, and so on for women. At the same time, small penises, or even average-sized penises, aren't nearly as sexualized. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 09/10/25 06:13 AM |
| -1 | Why is big size so sexualized compared to other sizes?While I agree that larger breasts are more sexualized, the point is that they're only more sexualized, not just that. There are still a huge number of people who like small, average-sized breasts, and even fetishize and openly display them. But when it comes to regular men and their penises? There's nowhere near as much of that. And regarding porn... As far as I remember, it used to be explained by the fact that the bigger the penis/breasts, etc., the more visible they were to the "viewer." It's… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 09/10/25 06:11 AM |
| 6 | Why is big size so sexualized compared to other sizes?While I agree that larger breasts are more sexualized, the point is that they're only more sexualized, not just that. There are still a huge number of people who like small, average-sized breasts, and even fetishize and openly display them. But when it comes to regular men and their penises? There's nowhere near as much of that. It's also strange that the most perverted people and fetishists constantly turn to big dicks. Even, in theory, it shouldn't be so one-sided. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 09/10/25 06:10 AM |
| – | CMV: Men should deny female "victims" sympathy for choosing violent/toxic menYou're slightly mistaken in thinking that women specifically choose aggressive men because of their aggression. But this isn't always the case. It's just that these terrible men have so-called "redeeming qualities" that compensate for all their shittiness. And so, bad men continue to openly be bad, barely concealing it because they're forgiven for it because of their attractive qualities. Being a "decent, cultured" man isn't a basic requirement; at best, it's somewhere in the top 10... | /r/PurplePillDebate | 08/10/25 06:55 AM |
| – | CMV: Men should deny female "victims" sympathy for choosing violent/toxic menEmpathy is a normal human quality and aspiration. Shocking, right? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 08/10/25 06:49 AM |
| 10 | Q4M: Why would anyone be ok with dating down?Because these partner selection criteria have very little impact on the quality of a partner. Therefore, many men quite logically focus on choosing a partner who is a good life partner, and only then a good worker, business, and so on. At the same time, this is important for women because they are, on average (not all), more submissive. Therefore, even more liberal women seek a man who can dominate at least occasionally, which is difficult when she is stronger than him socially and financially. … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 08/10/25 05:39 AM |
| 4 | Q4M: Why would anyone be ok with dating down?So that men would remain single forever. That makes sense. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 08/10/25 05:30 AM |
| 7 | The advice that “men need to stop showing interest in order to actually attract women” only works for certain top % men. It’s horrible advice and a catch 22 situation.>Because of these types of men, women have to be careful not to express their sexuality too openly, because it makes men start frothing and stalking and writing long screeds online that start with "Why won't she desire me as much as CHAD??" >It is unfortunate, but it's a logical response. It's not women who are denying you a feeling of attraction, it's men who punish women if they display attraction too openly. You understand that these are literally contradictory thoughts, right? It's impossibl… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 07/10/25 06:24 PM |
| 1 | LOOKS WEEKLY DISCUSSION THREAD"In general" doesn't mean always There is no point in arguing about this topic. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 07/10/25 05:58 PM |
| 24 | Does virgin-shaming exist?Of course it exists. Just like shaming small penises, shaming sexually unsuccessful men, and "incels" (who are usually not). These are all attempts to shame men as being unsexy and therefore generally immature in life. And yes, sometimes men do this to other men, too, but there's a difference. It's a gendered insult, and who uses it matters. Therefore, when men do it to men, the effect is different, just as if a woman calls a woman a "slut," the effect is also different. At the same time, when a… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 07/10/25 06:05 AM |
| 1 | Men need to stop being logicalYes, it's worse than being a liar again for you, but the fact that you're not responding to my comments again and constantly omitting everything I write, and I'm forced to constantly quote you and respond to your paragraphs in full. Since I'm at least arguing in good faith... When I literally took your quotes... Okay... | /r/PurplePillDebate | 07/10/25 05:55 AM |
| 0 | Men need to stop being logicalOkay…We're going back to kindergarten again, saying, "Yes, I said that (and responded to your comment this way), but I didn't say it word for word, so it doesn't count!" This is some kind of childish level of lying and denial... >You can't both demonize women for "chasing pussy tingles" and demand/expect pussy tingles from women. Literally nothing about this direct inconsistency has anything to do with "relationship potential." >No, he's basing his "being treated well" exclusively on what he ima… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 07/10/25 05:50 AM |
| – | Women are not repulsed by men opening up about their feelings, they're repulsed by incompetenceThere are literally no wrong ways to express emotions other than violent and disruptive ones.... >What really repulses women is the incompetence. Like if a man cries and expects the woman to solve all of his problems, that's repulsive. If a man has a good plan to solve his problems that's not repulsive. This smacks of toxic masculinity and femininity - idea that a man should be able to stand up in any situation, and a woman should be helpless and unable to support her man. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 07/10/25 05:46 AM |
| 0 | Men need to stop being logicalOkay... I'll just let your words speak for you.... >You can't both demonize women for "chasing pussy tingles" and demand/expect pussy tingles from women. Literally nothing about this direct inconsistency has anything to do with "relationship potential." >No, he's basing his "being treated well" exclusively on what he imagines she has done or would do for gigaChad, and not what his own expectations are. He expects this treatment even though he's not gigaChad. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 07/10/25 05:39 AM |
| 1 | LOOKS WEEKLY DISCUSSION THREADDid I once say that it is impossible for partners to be compatible with each other? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 07/10/25 05:37 AM |
| 0 | Men need to stop being logicalOf course, of course, when you literally deny that it's possible to choose a partner who's both sexually and romantically compatible... And you say that expecting attraction from your partner is abnormal for men... And all this considering that I LITERALLY dissected every single paragraph of yours. In a way, it's funny that I wasn't the only one who noticed your comment was incoherent and wrote about it. But nothing new, and I didn't even need to waste my time on you, even though I did😅 | /r/PurplePillDebate | 07/10/25 05:35 AM |
| 1 | LOOKS WEEKLY DISCUSSION THREADYou're not going to force anyone to be with someone they don't want to be with because you want to push the notion of what's fair or not. Romance doesn't work like that That's exactly what the people I addressed my comment to do. They try to humiliate men by forcing them to be with less attractive partners. Also I agree with the dude who said you need to address why you're focused on attractive men's choices. You're not the only man who tries to police attractive men's choices like you're sittin… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 07/10/25 04:55 AM |
| -1 | Men need to stop being logical>If the rest of your comments are similar strawmanning nonsense I'm just going to save my time I'm glad you realized you were spouting incoherent ideas that you couldn't explain or defend. Someone had to show you that🤷♂️ | /r/PurplePillDebate | 07/10/25 04:40 AM |
| -2 | Men need to stop being logical"I want raw, visceral lust and attraction. Also women who prioritize pussy tingles are shallow, stupid, vapid, and superficial and I will viciously attack women who prioritize men's looks in dating and attraction." So the man says he wants both things to be considered when searching for a partner: lust, sexual attraction, and relationship potential. That's quite logical. "I want women to sleep with me immediately because I can mind-read and know what they would and have done with ChAaAaAaAd. I'm… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/10/25 05:52 AM |
| 7 | LOOKS WEEKLY DISCUSSION THREAD"Men overestimate their attractiveness and are mistaken" - yep, but it doesn't change anything Even studies say that - yes, men overestimate their appearance, but not in the way women may feel It turned out that the perception of one's own appearance and that of others is similar for men, and how they "overestimate their attractiveness" also works the other way, because they see others as more attractive. So even if a hypothetical man 5/10 thinks that he is 7/10, then when he sees a woman 5/10, … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 05/10/25 01:36 PM |
| 5 | LOOKS WEEKLY DISCUSSION THREAD>Men in n count thread constantly tell how sluts are incapable of pair bonding etc. then here they say how they are attracted to majority of women while women are not. Who’s more likely to bond then? Is there any contradiction here? Men say they're sexually attracted to most women, not that they want to be in a relationship with all of them. >Because the way i see it women are more selective and choose who to fuck or spend time with while men are taking what they can, and also saying that they h… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 05/10/25 01:35 PM |
| 3 | LOOKS WEEKLY DISCUSSION THREADYep, it's like MrBeast's smile. Absolutely creepy and insincere. <image> | /r/PurplePillDebate | 05/10/25 07:25 AM |
| 1 | LOOKS WEEKLY DISCUSSION THREADYeah, just like you need to think less about the wonder of gay relationships. If it's gotten to the point where you spontaneously dream about it) | /r/PurplePillDebate | 05/10/25 07:08 AM |
| 1 | LOOKS WEEKLY DISCUSSION THREADAnd yes, if I were you, I wouldn't up the ante by accusing someone of being secretly gay, because it wasn't me who first brought it up and hasn't continued. You know... that you fantasize about someone being gay and talk about how wonderful your gay cousin is in a relationship... It sounds like you're totally cool with it, so go for it, bro, and find happiness for yourself too. You could even ask your cousin for advice. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 04/10/25 10:32 PM |
| 1 | LOOKS WEEKLY DISCUSSION THREADI just have to tell you that not noticing that attractive people exist, regardless of gender, isn't healthy, and you need to seek help. Or maybe it will come with life experience, because people grow up sooner or later and stop liking fart jokes and gay jokes... While for most people this goes away when they finish kindergarten or elementary school, for you it might take a little longer. And yes, if I were you, I wouldn't get too excited and be more careful. It seems you're paying a lot of atten… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 04/10/25 10:20 PM |
| 1 | LOOKS WEEKLY DISCUSSION THREADNoticing and recognizing attractive people around you is pretty easy if you're mentally and generally healthy. Perhaps this is unusual for you because you're simply inexperienced in life. After all, the kind of stupid trolling you're attempting right now demonstrates this quite well. And also, the fact that you're trying to devalue other people's life experiences at the expense of your own... That doesn't indicate maturity either, bro. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 04/10/25 10:11 PM |
| 1 | LOOKS WEEKLY DISCUSSION THREADI'd say it's the opposite; I've seen more attractive men date less attractive women. But maybe something about these women attracts these men, so it's normal. I personally don't have anything against chubby girls, for example, even though I'm in shape. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 04/10/25 10:03 PM |
| 2 | LOOKS WEEKLY DISCUSSION THREADOf course that may be so..., but that doesn't change what I said. Because people who say, "What you can get in dating is your league," are actually denying that it's normal for people in relationships to be matched in terms of attractiveness. They most often claim, for example, that the average woman is much more attractive than the average man, although this makes no sense. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 04/10/25 09:52 PM |
| 1 | LOOKS WEEKLY DISCUSSION THREADI can say the same in response. My experience corresponds to reality, but yours does not🤷♂️ | /r/PurplePillDebate | 04/10/25 09:46 PM |
| 0 | LOOKS WEEKLY DISCUSSION THREADThen I might strongly disagree, because I constantly see couples where one person is "in a different league" than the other. And I've also seen such couples in my circle. See? I can also invalidate your point of view with my life experience, but that doesn't mean your experience is invalid, does it? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 04/10/25 09:41 PM |
| 6 | LOOKS WEEKLY DISCUSSION THREAD"What you can get in dating is your league" is simply untrue and is intended to downplay men's legitimate concerns about finding their female counterpart in appearance/personality. At the very least, men have a higher, spontaneous sex drive, are attracted to a wider range of women, and have a wide variety of fetishes. Because of this, there will never be a complete and consistent match in appearance between men and women in couples, as an average woman will often be less attracted to an average … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 04/10/25 09:01 PM |
| 1 | N COUNTS WEEKLY DISCUSSION THREADThose who constantly downplay the importance of "n-count"; Sexual compatibility experiences and are offended by what they consider "slut-shaming" and an attempt to portray high-N-count women as terrible and bad; they deny that women are capable of settling for men they are not attracted to; they deny the existence of "pair bonds," "alpha widows and widowers," and so on—they're simply indulging in maximalism. When someone says that "women and men with a high N-count cheat more often," this doesn'… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 04/10/25 11:44 AM |
| 3 | Women make it very stressful for men to stay singleWell, okay, it's not that important, so I won't take up any more of your time, have a nice day. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 03/10/25 05:48 PM |
| 5 | Women make it very stressful for men to stay singleSimply mentioning him in the context of a discussion about him or someone else's life, rather than a discussion, is against the rules. Despite the fact that his situation was revealed to be truly disgusting. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 03/10/25 05:47 PM |
| – | Women make it very stressful for men to stay singleI repeat, this is literally a witch hunt and I was banned for what you did.🤷♂️ | /r/PurplePillDebate | 03/10/25 05:42 PM |
| – | Women make it very stressful for men to stay singleAh, even so... Then honestly, that makes it even worse in this situation. It smells like he wanted sex and ended up trying to pressure her. But it's still a witch hunt, since it has nothing to do with the post itself, and yet it concerns another person's personal posting history and even naming them specifically. This is usually punishable by a ban, and I've had this happen here, but I suspect you'll be fine and won't be punished for it | /r/PurplePillDebate | 03/10/25 05:32 PM |
| – | Women make it very stressful for men to stay singleNow it's just a generalization that all virginal/inexperienced men are bastards, and this kind of confirms the OP's post. This doesn't make the situation any better, to be honest, despite the fact that I find the OP questionable, to put it mildly, because of what he revealed earlier. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 03/10/25 05:29 PM |
| 4 | You should do a distracting activity on your first date with someone if you want them to like youWhile I agree that using common interests is good for dating, as it creates a safe environment, you need to keep in mind that men and women often have different hobbies and aren't intersex. So you need to be extremely careful here and advise men that they should never pursue "feminine" hobbies, especially those they're not interested in, just for the sake of sex. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 03/10/25 05:18 PM |
| – | Women make it very stressful for men to stay singleThis is literally a witch hunt. Despite the fact that this guy was being cringeworthy and whining about being rejected by a girl he had previously shamed because she hit on him - but that really has nothing to do with the discussion. He screwed up back then, but there's no need to "expect someone to be accountable for their own actions" | /r/PurplePillDebate | 03/10/25 05:05 PM |
| 1 | N COUNTS WEEKLY DISCUSSION THREADThanks for telling me, I encounter this often here and on various topics. My comments are shown to me, but if I look at them from another browser, no one can see them. I'm already afraid it's some kind of shadow ban. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 03/10/25 11:37 AM |
| – | N COUNTS WEEKLY DISCUSSION THREADAnd honestly, you're right, because this is literally part of my larger comment that I can't post. Can you still see my original comment, or was it deleted? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 03/10/25 11:28 AM |
| – | N COUNTS WEEKLY DISCUSSION THREADThose who constantly downplay the importance of "n-count"; Sexual compatibility experiences and are offended by what they consider "slut-shaming" and an attempt to portray high-N-count women as terrible and bad; they deny that women are capable of settling for men they are not attracted to; they deny the existence of "pair bonds," "alpha widows and widowers," and so on—they're simply indulging in maximalism. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 03/10/25 11:15 AM |
| 1 | N COUNTS WEEKLY DISCUSSION THREADThose who constantly downplay the importance of "n-count"; Sexual compatibility experiences and are offended by what they consider "slut-shaming" and an attempt to portray high-N-count women as terrible and bad; they deny that women are capable of settling for men they are not attracted to; they deny the existence of "pair bonds," "alpha widows and widowers," and so on—they're simply indulging in maximalism. When someone says that "women and men with a high N-count cheat more often," this doesn'… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 03/10/25 11:12 AM |
| 1 | N COUNTS WEEKLY DISCUSSION THREADThose who constantly downplay the importance of "n-count"; Sexual compatibility experiences and are offended by what they consider "slut-shaming" and an attempt to portray high-N-count women as terrible and bad; they deny that women are capable of settling for men they are not attracted to; they deny the existence of "pair bonds," "alpha widows and widowers," and so on—they're simply indulging in maximalism. When someone says that "women and men with a high N-count cheat more often," this doesn'… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 03/10/25 11:10 AM |
| 3 | N COUNTS WEEKLY DISCUSSION THREADWhere did you get that from? Even the most horrific "slut-shamers" never say that an N-count is the only standard that exists and should be. It's just one of many things, and it's even possible that other things will overcome even a high N-count and make such men and women reconsider. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 03/10/25 11:08 AM |
| 1 | N COUNTS WEEKLY DISCUSSION THREADThose who constantly downplay the importance of "n-count"; Sexual compatibility experiences and are offended by what they consider "slut-shaming" and an attempt to portray high-N-count women as terrible and bad; they deny that women are capable of settling for men they are not attracted to; they deny the existence of "pair bonds," "alpha widows and widowers," and so on—they're simply indulging in maximalism. When someone says that "women and men with a high N-count cheat more often," this doesn'… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 03/10/25 11:04 AM |
| 1 | N COUNTS WEEKLY DISCUSSION THREADThose who constantly downplay the importance of "n-count"; Sexual compatibility experiences and are offended by what they consider "slut-shaming" and an attempt to portray high-N-count women as terrible and bad; they deny that women are capable of settling for men they are not attracted to; they deny the existence of "pair bonds," "alpha widows and widowers," and so on—they're simply indulging in maximalism. When someone says that "women and men with a high N-count cheat more often," this doesn'… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 03/10/25 10:55 AM |
| 1 | You have two options - which one would you go for?In option 1, I understand it's a long-term marriage for life? It sounds good and loving, so she's not aromantic, but still, asexuality is very bad in this context. Because she essentially doesn't want sex with me at all, even as a gesture of caring for my needs (which, of course, is bad in itself, since it's non-consensual sex from her). But this isn't a true monogamous relationship because there's no sexuality or exclusivity in it. On the other hand, option 2 is something like a FWB arrangement… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 02/10/25 03:42 PM |
| – | Men think they are more attractive than they really areIt's just a lie supposedly based on truth. Even studies say that yes, men overestimate their appearance, but not in the way you want, lol It turned out that the perception of one's own appearance and that of others is similar for men, and how they "overestimate their attractiveness" also works the other way, because they see others as more attractive. So even if a hypothetical man 5/10 thinks that he is 7/10, then when he sees a woman 5/10, he will think that she is 7. And a woman 7, he will thi… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 02/10/25 04:37 AM |
| – | Men think they are more attractive than they really areThe funniest thing is that these same women then shout, "Women don't settle for men, it's all fantasy!" When even here it's confirmed and it matches the statistics, lol | /r/PurplePillDebate | 02/10/25 04:31 AM |
| 1 | The reason why many men like the idea of being "sex material" isn't because they're only interested in sex."They're more likely checking to see if you care about them." - my point exactly, if that's the only measurement for me "caring" that's not about caring at all. Because in addition to "personal concern," normal, non-desirable men also check for "sexual concern." For you, this isn't so important, since men are almost always sexually attracted to women, but not the opposite. Therefore, it's important for you to evaluate how a man sees you as a person, while a man needs to check both. For example, … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/10/25 09:15 AM |
| 1 | The reason why many men like the idea of being "sex material" isn't because they're only interested in sex."They're more likely checking to see if you care about them." - my point exactly, if that's the only measurement for me "caring" that's not about caring at all. Because in addition to "personal concern," normal, non-desirable men also check for "sexual concern." For you, this isn't so important, since men are almost always sexually attracted to women, but not the opposite. Therefore, it's important for you to evaluate how a man sees you as a person, while a man needs to check both. For example, … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/10/25 08:40 AM |
| 7 | The reason why many men like the idea of being "sex material" isn't because they're only interested in sex.>Is this why they all measure how much effort they have to put to get sex, and effort being is spending time with me? Sounds like they don’t really care about me, don’t like me etc. They're more likely checking to see if you care about them. It's not a crime. >Anyway, if your point is that a man should be both i have no argument against it, yes a man should be both. But men here come wanting to know how to have sex and avoid women liking them, which is kind of my point that no, men care only abo… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/10/25 08:19 AM |
| 13 | The reason why many men like the idea of being "sex material" isn't because they're only interested in sex.Rather, it's not a requirement if the guy is truly hot. And nothing prevents a fuckboy from having "stability, profession, or income." | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/10/25 08:05 AM |
| 11 | The reason why many men like the idea of being "sex material" isn't because they're only interested in sex.Yeah, because the only thing that keeps a lot of fuckboys from relationships is their unwillingness to be in a relationship. So all they have to do is want it, and everything will work out. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/10/25 05:09 AM |
| 9 | The reason why many men like the idea of being "sex material" isn't because they're only interested in sex.What's the problem here? Sex makes any normal person sexually appreciated, both men and women. Especially from those who are in love with you, and even PiV may not be necessary. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/10/25 05:08 AM |
| 13 | The reason why many men like the idea of being "sex material" isn't because they're only interested in sex.This is precisely the point of view of a person who knows his own worth. I support this. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/10/25 05:06 AM |
| 4 | The reason why many men like the idea of being "sex material" isn't because they're only interested in sex.That's exactly why when I see women here who are supposedly "mature and wouldn't go for a fuckboy," I smile. Like, I'm happy for them, and maybe they really won't be interested in a fuckboy, but them are not all women’s in the world, and there are still plenty who are interested. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/10/25 05:05 AM |
| 1 | The Manosphere doesn't care about men's issues Vol III: Trump's military policeNot now, anyone under 23 can leave. At the very beginning of the war, of course, there were some opportunities for those studying to leave, but soon they, too, were banned from leaving if they were over 18. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/10/25 05:00 AM |
| 9 | The Manosphere doesn't care about men's issues Vol III: Trump's military policeThis is indeed true, as young people are being recruited in smaller numbers, so the next generation needs to be protected. But this system is also sabotaged from the start, as women of all ages were allowed to leave Ukraine, just as some men were allowed to leave just recently. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 30/09/25 09:19 PM |
| 10 | The Manosphere doesn't care about men's issues Vol III: Trump's military policeAnd by the way, I'd like to add that men aged 18 to 22 are now also allowed to travel abroad. Previously, this was prohibited, and only those under 18 could travel. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 30/09/25 09:16 PM |
| 1 | N COUNTS WEEKLY DISCUSSION THREADWell, I disagree with that and explained why. I can't do more if you stubbornly ignore everything I explain. That's okay, I think we disagree here. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 30/09/25 08:17 PM |
| 1 | N COUNTS WEEKLY DISCUSSION THREADThe n-count is literally the first indicator that says it all. It's also the foundation of everything and can reveal discrepancies in the "truthfulness" of what a more experienced partner claims. The fact that there are more precise methods of compatibility analysis doesn't eliminate the fact that the general n-count still exists and can be used as a basis for judgment. Like I said, for example, if a more experienced person claims to be very romantic and dreams of an LTR, and yet their n-count i… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 30/09/25 07:17 PM |
| 1 | N COUNTS WEEKLY DISCUSSION THREADOf course, it's important. To avoid a power imbalance, for example, a more experienced partner, even without intending to be toxic, could easily do so accidentally. And this also ties into what I already mentioned: the desire to truly be the center of one's partner's universe. This is normal, but the chances of this happening drop significantly the higher one's partner's n-count, so this is also a very good predictor. And then there's the possible difference in views on sex and romance. People w… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 30/09/25 06:48 PM |
| 2 | In certain cases husband material is better than hookup materialIt seems like it's been said here many times that the problem with "husband material" and "boyfriend material" is that usually when women use "husband material," it means they're not attracted to the man, but possess financial and "caring" qualities. Women themselves seem to have devalued the term, even outside of Reddit and the internet in general. Hell, I've even heard that expression in a language other than English, lol. It also goes to the fact that "boyfriend material" almost always has a … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 30/09/25 06:36 PM |
| 1 | N COUNTS WEEKLY DISCUSSION THREADThese aren't contradictory things at all…. And I've also written many times that self-doubt is justified if your partner doesn't want you and doesn't show it. So if someone is doing well with their partner, then there won't be any self-doubt or RJ. I think I even wrote a post about this. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 30/09/25 06:24 PM |
| 1 | N COUNTS WEEKLY DISCUSSION THREADThe reason men might resent a "change in treatment" compared to their previous partners isn't some mythical "insecurity." It's because they don't like information being hidden from them—information that's truly important when choosing a partner and shows whether you're truly loved and whether your partner is willing to give you the same "investments" you give them. And what they did in the past is a good indicator of what they were capable of doing for someone. And this applies most importantly … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 30/09/25 08:58 AM |
| 1 | N COUNTS WEEKLY DISCUSSION THREADI don't think I said what you call... | /r/PurplePillDebate | 30/09/25 08:42 AM |
| 1 | Highly attractive humans being bad doesn't corelate with realityI can agree with this, but only partially. And this applies not only to attractiveness, but to everything: social class, economic class, education, and so on. I've noticed myself that people who are outsiders can be bitter; I still remember the story of a close friend of mine who was like that. Meanwhile, now I associate with attractive and educated people like me, and life is much better. But at the same time, I also can't agree with this, because power, even in the smallest things, often corru… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 29/09/25 09:40 AM |
| 1 | Highly attractive humans being bad doesn't corelate with realityI can agree with this, but only partially. And this applies not only to attractiveness, but to everything: social class, economic class, education, and so on. I've noticed myself that people who are outsiders can be bitter; I still remember the story of a close friend of mine who was like that. Meanwhile, now I associate with attractive and educated people like me, and life is much better. But at the same time, I also can't agree with this, because power, even in the smallest things, often corru… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 29/09/25 08:50 AM |
| -3 | There's nothing wrong with men not caring as much about the "work and school" of the women they date.>The problem with your OP is that it’s impossible to debate an opinion It looks like you're having some kind of problem🤷♂️ After I described everything and even responded to your comment in detail. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 28/09/25 05:41 PM |
| -1 | There's nothing wrong with men not caring as much about the "work and school" of the women they date.>Reasons don’t matter, only money No >And if you don’t care about money, it’s less likely you will be financially advantaged in a divorce No No, this doesn't affect the fact that women are the leaders in divorces, even in lesbian relationships and in any income category. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 28/09/25 05:39 PM |
| -1 | There's nothing wrong with men not caring as much about the "work and school" of the women they date.>(Also, the post is clearly an answer to people criticizing men willing to "date down" and that being framed as immoral eg "wanting slaves" which is an attitude that comes up a decent amount in gender discussions.) Yes, actually, that's it. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 28/09/25 05:25 PM |
| -7 | There's nothing wrong with men not caring as much about the "work and school" of the women they date.Because if women continue to lead in divorce rates, it won't matter how much men care. What you're saying sounds suspiciously like victim blaming. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 28/09/25 05:24 PM |
| 2 | There's nothing wrong with men not caring as much about the "work and school" of the women they date.This doesn't change anything I said at all. The fact that someone is «date within their same socioeconomic niche» It doesn't change the fact that men generally don't care as much about women's earnings. Besides, it's quite traditional for women to go to higher-earning men, even if they're in the same class. This is less common with men. And the problem of "divorce rape" is not only in the divorces themselves and alimony (I am for this and for it to be for children), but in the fact that women ge… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 28/09/25 04:50 PM |
| -6 | There's nothing wrong with men not caring as much about the "work and school" of the women they date.Only when women stop leading in divorce rates | /r/PurplePillDebate | 28/09/25 04:45 PM |
| 5 | N COUNTS WEEKLY DISCUSSION THREADIf your new girlfriend is enthusiastic about fucking you, then you can be certain she’s not settling in attraction when she initially picked you. This is literally my original comment, lol | /r/PurplePillDebate | 28/09/25 04:44 PM |
| 10 | CMV: it's underhanded for men to keep their assets in their mother's name in case of a breakupThese are two very similar things. Financial savings that someone made in secret from their partner, with the expectation that their partner would divorce them without cause / become an aggressive maniac. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 28/09/25 04:42 PM |
| 18 | CMV: it's underhanded for men to keep their assets in their mother's name in case of a breakupI think this is something of a "safety bag" for men. Just as women try to take care of their safety in a relationship, and afterward, men can do the same. However, if there is complete safety in a relationship for both partners, then everything is fine and there shouldn't be any secret assets from each other. But it's a two-way street, and either both partners should have the right to take care of their safety, or neither should. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 28/09/25 04:09 PM |
| 4 | N COUNTS WEEKLY DISCUSSION THREADBesides the fact that they don't do it and it doesn't always work out for them. So I'm actually willing to compromise and say, sometimes it works to "locking up, the men they really like“ and sometimes it doesn't, just like in real life. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 28/09/25 04:03 PM |
| 6 | N COUNTS WEEKLY DISCUSSION THREADHonestly, I've never known an angry slut Sounds like fanfiction I haven't seen any evil nice guys in real life, so they don't exist either. Who does this? Especially sluts? Yep, precisely because they can't always lock up the men they really like. I've seen this kind of crap more than once in real life, both in older and younger generations, in various church concessions, economic, and academic circles. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 28/09/25 03:28 PM |
| 2 | N COUNTS WEEKLY DISCUSSION THREADThe problem is elsewhere It could also be a settling. In one of the internet spaces (not in English) where I used to hang out, there was even a name for this phenomenon: "demo mode." | /r/PurplePillDebate | 28/09/25 03:25 PM |
| 5 | N COUNTS WEEKLY DISCUSSION THREADI really think so-called "sluts" are only angry that men don't like their past for one reason... Because they don't want to fuck their partners. Seriously, if any promiscuous woman or their partner has a problem with their past, my God, there's no simpler solution in this world. Just fuck your partners, and then they simply won't have TIME to think about your past, nor will they have the motivation to do so, because self-doubt usually has a real cause. And here, there's no reason for self-doubt,… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 28/09/25 02:08 PM |
| 1 | N COUNTS WEEKLY DISCUSSION THREADSo basically you essentially you can't read. Okay, tell a lot about you to be honest Although I agree that timing is important: if she was one way 10 years ago and is different now, that might be normal. But if it's a change like, "Six months ago I did one thing and today I do something else," then there are questions and it shows that this isn't organic growth. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 28/09/25 08:49 AM |
| 3 | N COUNTS WEEKLY DISCUSSION THREADIt doesn't matter why the rules were changed. Either he gets educated and creates a new rule, or she gets burned and that creates a new rule. Honestly, the fact that she got burned and is now creating obstacles for me only makes the situation worse, because essentially it's because of some jerk who harmed her—even though I'm not him and don't intend to be like him. And yes, I feel exactly the same way if a guy did this to a girl because his ex did something—the new girl isn't his ex and shouldn'… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 28/09/25 08:40 AM |
| 4 | N COUNTS WEEKLY DISCUSSION THREADOf course, it's not a 100% guarantee. But you know, the probability is still higher, simply because the quantity is greater. If someone has tried more of something, then in any case, the likelihood that they experienced something extraordinary or at least unusual (due to novelty) is huge. And this is especially detrimental for average guys who don't stand out by default and who will ultimately have to compete with more attractive (since they're capable of casual sex) and more sexually experience… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 28/09/25 07:52 AM |
| 1 | N COUNTS WEEKLY DISCUSSION THREADEverything would probably be fine with either option. Although it would also be nice if the woman 1 ,sooner or later (at a more serious stage in our relationship) switched to no protection, but that's not absolutely necessary, and her comfort and reluctance to take pills can be prioritized. But it's important that woman 2 doesn't suddenly want it and doesn't always use condoms with me. Okay, that's okay and even necessary at the very beginning, but if she didn't use it in her previous relationsh… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 28/09/25 07:43 AM |
| – | why do men hate sluts so much, instead of just feeling neutral?>hot woman who wanted them You understand that's the main thing here, right? Lol, shaming someone for wanting to be with someone who likes them | /r/PurplePillDebate | 26/09/25 01:30 PM |
| – | why do men hate sluts so much, instead of just feeling neutral?First of all, I'm against slut-shaming. But if you think about it, it's probably often done by men who don't have sex with these "sluts." + It's also just a gendered insult that's easy to use on women because of that: >male promiscuity is respected but female promiscuity isn’t, is usually that it’s hard for men to get sex but not for women. And women also call other women sluts, again because it's simply a gendered insult. Just like trying to shame men for having "small dick energy." | /r/PurplePillDebate | 26/09/25 01:29 PM |
| 0 | Male promiscuity is the source of all of men's dating problemsNo, and this can be understood from simple fact number one... Men who are experiencing problems and promiscuous men are two completely different groups of people. Fact number two: men are simply more lustful due to high testosterone levels. This is not up for debate. Fact number three... Men are forced to take the initiative and show increased interest in women only because if they don't, they will die alone. Even liberal women don't approach men more often, or men need to be EXTRA hot and at le… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/09/25 02:56 PM |
| 2 | Women and sex are not your reward for working and contributing to societyReally, thank you for your good wishes. You're a good soul. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 24/09/25 07:33 PM |
| – | DISCUSSION🗨️ ABOUT MAIN PPD POSTS📮, LOOKS👀, AND N-COUNT🔢 ARE RESTRICTED🚫 FROM THE DAILY🌞 MEGATHREAD🧵>Tiny phone supremacy. Based | /r/PurplePillDebate | 23/09/25 10:05 AM |
| 3 | Women and sex are not your reward for working and contributing to societyReally thank you for explaining where women had problems with sexism towards them in the US. >Humans are omnivores, and our larger brains make up for our need to use only brute force to survive. If it weren't for our brains and working in groups, we would've died out long ago. I actually agree with that. But it also shows that it was necessary to find common ground with others to survive successfully. Someone could, of course, try to take everything by force or manipulation, but there will likel… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 22/09/25 08:07 PM |
| 0 | Before or After>No, it's unrequited romantic infatuation, not love. Here are several official dictionary definitions. Wikipedia is not a source: There's no difference between the letters. You don't need semantics to try to say that if someone falls in love with someone, they're not in love, lol | /r/PurplePillDebate | 22/09/25 05:30 PM |
| 2 | Women and sex are not your reward for working and contributing to society>People choosing their own partners is a relative recent development in human history since romantic love wasn't seen as a priority over a sensible or advantageous match Probably, but this wasn't the case everywhere. For example, in my homeland, there were quite a few traditions where couples formed organically. >About terrible people only having children recently, remember that our history is full of groups who saw wholesale violence as a way of life These terrible groups were cruel to other gr… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 22/09/25 05:25 PM |
| 2 | Before or AfterI was simply clarifying that limerence is still love, even though you say it isn't. Obsessive and unrequited, but still love. And I largely agree that it's better to take a more gradual approach in such a situation and not take radical action, but rather "test the waters," so to speak. >How the hell would a dude feel if some woman he never thought of as more than a friend or casual acquaintance said "omg, let's get married, and let's have 5 kids, and raise them all in a 6 bedroom house, I have t… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 22/09/25 05:11 PM |
| 4 | Before or After>It's about being upfront about interest when it develops and not bottling it up until it becomes this weird, possessive, all-consuming emotion (read: limerance) that the guys who complain about the "Friendzone" always make it out to be when they falsely call it "love" - often because they've never experienced love. Limerence is the mental state of being madly in love[1][2] or intensely infatuated[3][4] when reciprocation of the feeling is uncertain | /r/PurplePillDebate | 22/09/25 04:47 PM |
| 1 | Women and sex are not your reward for working and contributing to society>I don't know where you are from, but the OP's post makes sense within the context of American society in the wake of the internet bro culture where the subjugation of women is heavily pushed and seen as a male right I'm from Eastern Europe. And from the outside , what's happening in America, I see that this is quite a lot, because the reasons for this rightward turn are quite straightforward. Men feel vulnerable and unheard, which results in them becoming radicalized, something some feminists a… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 22/09/25 04:36 PM |
| 10 | Women and sex are not your reward for working and contributing to society>Where did this bizarre idea come from, that beyond money, society somehow owes you women’s bodies too? This isn't a completely fringe idea, or even an unusual one. The most ancient system was one in which only those who abide by its laws and can still enjoy its benefits could live in society. This goes back to the days of hunter-gatherers, when our ancestors lived in groups of hundreds at a time. And this was the case until the beginning of the last century, even in most civilized countries. An… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 22/09/25 03:47 PM |
| 1 | For men who get no attention/success with women. Have you been hit on by gay men ?I did receive attention from women, but although I had cases where some guys made very ambiguous hints to me.And although these guys were not open about their status and sexuality, but many people always assumed that they were at least bi, and most likely played for the same team. For example, compliments about how they really liked my hands and fingers. I don't know why they paid attention to that, lol. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/09/25 03:27 PM |
| 5 | "Women are just as horny, they just have safety/shame issues" doesn't check out with women not being tormented by sexlessness.They literally feel lust and attraction for her. Whether they feel feelings/intimacy for her and care about her interests is another matter entirely. You're confusing sexual attraction with caring about someone's feelings/being in love. It's possible to lust for someone without feeling caring about them. That's how ONS works, for example, and both men and women feel this way. And prostitution is literally an element of transaction and/or barter, and the one "providing services" doesn't feel lust… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/09/25 11:06 AM |
| 3 | "Women are just as horny, they just have safety/shame issues" doesn't check out with women not being tormented by sexlessness.Well, yeah, I guess. I can't stand it when people ask such stupid questions and don't understand the difference between a literal transaction and a sexual desire. And that's despite the fact that I don't approve of sex with people who don't care about your well-being and only see you as a "piece of meat," but damn. Difference is huge. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/09/25 10:16 AM |
| 6 | "Women are just as horny, they just have safety/shame issues" doesn't check out with women not being tormented by sexlessness.Perhaps because in this situation, a man is having sex with a woman for free and still feels attraction to her beyond the literal barter of money for sex? It's hard to understand, I caught it. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/09/25 10:08 AM |
| 2 | DISCUSSION🗨️ ABOUT MAIN PPD POSTS📮, LOOKS👀, AND N-COUNT🔢 ARE RESTRICTED🚫 FROM THE DAILY🌞 MEGATHREAD🧵I find it a little hard to believe that any man would consider her "chubby" and unattractive. But then I remember that there are plenty of extremely picky, low-testosterone men on the internet who will find negativity even in goddesses, and everything falls into place. Before she lost weight, she was literally a dream type. It's a real tragedy, but let's hope everything turns out well for her. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/09/25 08:08 AM |
| 5 | Men think Being A Passive Submissive guy is Being Nice Then Claim Women Don’t Want Nice Guys.Everyone should see this | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/09/25 06:32 AM |
| 1 | LOOKS WEEKLY DISCUSSION THREADI hadn't really thought about it. Does body hair function as a kind of sign of masculinity here? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/09/25 06:25 AM |
| 1 | LOOKS WEEKLY DISCUSSION THREAD>He looks relatively toned and fit in comparison to most men who never exercise at all, which is more than enough Probably compared to the fact that most American men are fat, then yes But it is still far from the athletic form I am talking about and which women still value. >He is definitely 7/10, which most people consider objectively handsome. Yes, women wouldn't chase him, because women only chase very high status men and that has little to do with their physiques No, he's not a 7/10, otherw… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/09/25 06:22 AM |
| 1 | LOOKS WEEKLY DISCUSSION THREADHe looks hot, but he's not the type I'm talking about. He looks more like a ripped crossfiter and is more focused on endurance and cardio, while I'm talking about the more muscular types. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 20/09/25 09:28 PM |
| 1 | LOOKS WEEKLY DISCUSSION THREADThat's probably true.I can see the logic Although I still find it amusing that women here don't pay much attention to six-pack abs, muscular forearms, or a B-shaped figure in men. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 20/09/25 09:25 PM |
| 0 | LOOKS WEEKLY DISCUSSION THREAD>Which meds she is on (if she's available to someone who posts here she's on medication) I understand a bit about the definition of muscularity and age, but this... Are you talking about birth control and how it affects women's preferences? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 20/09/25 09:23 PM |
| 1 | LOOKS WEEKLY DISCUSSION THREAD>Average women will mostly congregate around this type of musculature, which is well within the healthy range and achievable with only a year or two of dedicated exercise and diet. And this guy definitely doesn't exercise that much. It's six months at best, and even then it's more focused on traps and shoulders. Everything else isn't great. And most likely without any diet or balance of proteins, fats and carbohydrates Not bragging, but I looked better when I was 14 (even though I did kickboxing… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 20/09/25 09:21 PM |
| 15 | LOOKS WEEKLY DISCUSSION THREADI honestly don't believe it when women say they don't like muscles on men. It's as if every time they talk about it, they picture a man 6'6" tall and 6'6" wide with tons of muscle. Or some kind of fat-laden powerlifter. This is a very small percentage of men, many of whom are professional athletes. Meanwhile, regular men who build up their core, shoulders, forearms, and maybe back muscles - won't look like bodybuilders, but they'll be much more attractive. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 20/09/25 05:53 PM |
| 5 | LOOKS WEEKLY DISCUSSION THREADWell, yeah, that's what makes me laugh the most when women (especially here) talk about different actors and stars. "See, I like guy number 1, and the other woman likes guy number 2. We have different tastes!" And this is despite the fact that both of these men literally always have more traditionally masculine attractive features and have a lot in common. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 20/09/25 05:49 PM |
| 1 | LOOKS WEEKLY DISCUSSION THREADI don't see much of a difference here, since I'm not opposed to either short or tall girls. But I've dated very short girls before, but never tall ones. So why not? Tall girls are beautiful too and deserve all the love in this world. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 20/09/25 05:45 PM |
| 1 | They are not rules if you don't enforce them.I've been thinking about this for a while, but your phrase hit the nail on the head. Thanks, bro. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 20/09/25 02:08 PM |
| 3 | Why do you want women to tell men "be attractive" ?Because men who ask for advice on how to be romantically successful need full information. No, it's not fucking obvious that "you need to be attractive from the start," because there's still strong propaganda that "being nice is the bare minimum" and that romantically unsuccessful men have problems not because of their attractiveness but because of their "misogyny." So if someone doesn't consistently say out loud that "being attractive is important," then they're a piece of shit and not an advis… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/09/25 06:21 PM |
| 30 | The entitlement of certain autistic men is bafflingWhat I noticed isn't "entitlement" or any other bullshit, but simply fatigue and a question about why everything you said doesn't apply to autistic women. After all, neurodivergent women still statistically have significantly more opportunities for relationships of any kind than men. And yes, autistic women and autistic men are identical in their attractiveness, and autistic women have no advantage whatsoever. All this nonsense about them "better at masking their autism" and so on is bullshit. M… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/09/25 07:42 PM |
| 5 | Women who hook up... why?Thank you for also providing a definition of your behavior. And add the word "gaslighting" to your vocabulary. You use similar tactics, so it wouldn't hurt if you knew what it is. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/09/25 05:50 PM |
| 4 | Women who hook up... why?Or maybe you just don't know the word "manipulation" or the word "lie"🤷♂️ | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/09/25 05:34 PM |
| 1 | The cognitive dissonance behind men approaching women is the same cognitive dissonance behind men objectifying women.Why, we don't do this for any other form of education. Because feminist education is being forced on those who don't need it. I did read it, you're avoiding answering questions or elaborating. We're having a conversation No, you didn't. Have a nice day. Try trolling better in the future. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/09/25 05:30 PM |
| 5 | Women who hook up... why?I just don't like blatant lies and manipulation🤷♂️ | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/09/25 05:27 PM |
| 4 | Women who hook up... why?It seems you didn't read his comment, because he didn't write anything about manipulating inexperienced women for bad sex.🤷♂️ | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/09/25 05:09 PM |
| 1 | The cognitive dissonance behind men approaching women is the same cognitive dissonance behind men objectifying women.Anti-rape education should only be for rapists. Other people don't do it because they've already been raised that way. Further pressure on them simply doesn't produce results. And yes, the problem is that you don't read what I write. At least you acknowledged it, and now I understand I shouldn't waste my time here. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/09/25 05:08 PM |
| 0 | Women who hook up... why?>you said an inexperienced woman will withstand a bad sex situation instead of dumping you No. This is what he said: >Rather than be a leader and one identify where it is going wrong and two take action to fix it you instead just end it. Teaching is the hard way and this is how relationships are maintained. Both parties being willing to lead. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/09/25 04:37 PM |
| 2 | Women who hook up... why?It's sad that you take good wishes for "icks" | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/09/25 04:34 PM |
| 1 | The cognitive dissonance behind men approaching women is the same cognitive dissonance behind men objectifying women.Because anti-rape education only works with those who listen to feminists, and those people... Well, they're usually not rapists. And to understand what infanticide has to do with it, you need to reread my previous comment. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/09/25 04:32 PM |
| 1 | Women who hook up... why?And I hope you a stable and wonderful sex life with your husband. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/09/25 04:30 PM |
| – | Women like masculinity because it is deeply homoerotic>As an extreme, look at Afghanistan - a hypermasculine society where women are considered to be tools for creating children while for sexual pleasure men are raping young boys (like catholic priests). Or look at all the fighting sports or soccer or even weight training where men like so much to hug each other and check out each other bodies. Masculine men love men, they obsess over them, all their idols are men, they look up to men, they worship male bodies, etc. Unfortunately or fortunately (mo… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/09/25 04:22 PM |
| 2 | Women who hook up... why?If a good memory is "creepy" for you, then I... I just wish you mental health and a healthy nervous system. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/09/25 04:15 PM |
| 1 | Women who hook up... why?It seems like you're really flattering yourself. I just wished you well. It's not my fault that you commented on the most popular comment (at the time of my comment) under this post🤷♂️ | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/09/25 04:09 PM |
| 0 | Women who hook up... why?I hope so, but you used to say something different. But people change over time. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/09/25 04:04 PM |
| 1 | The cognitive dissonance behind men approaching women is the same cognitive dissonance behind men objectifying women.Just because these women call ALL men rapists Women are the leading perpetrators of child murder and are no less vocal than men in their opposition to domestic violence, but that doesn't mean all women should be labeled as such. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/09/25 04:03 PM |
| 1 | The cognitive dissonance behind men approaching women is the same cognitive dissonance behind men objectifying women.Well, for some reason no one had problems understanding the text, only you🤷♂️ | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/09/25 03:59 PM |
| 3 | Women who hook up... why?Stalking? Are you banging your head or just flattering yourself? But, yes, you're right about that; I definitely wouldn't want to be in a relationship with an asexual. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/09/25 03:58 PM |
| 1 | The cognitive dissonance behind men approaching women is the same cognitive dissonance behind men objectifying women.I suspect you should just read my comments and look at the answers to all the questions you asked. Because you definitely have a problem here that needs solving. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/09/25 03:55 PM |
| 1 | Women who hook up... why?Yeah, but only after a chocolate bar. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/09/25 03:52 PM |
| 1 | The cognitive dissonance behind men approaching women is the same cognitive dissonance behind men objectifying women.I already did this in my first comment. Answering your question about why aggressive feminist propaganda isn't needed. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/09/25 03:41 PM |
| 1 | The cognitive dissonance behind men approaching women is the same cognitive dissonance behind men objectifying women.You're currently the one shutting down discussion and not willing to read the existing answers to all your questions | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/09/25 02:49 PM |
| 2 | The cognitive dissonance behind men approaching women is the same cognitive dissonance behind men objectifying women.I don't care if you think it doesn't work. Of course, because you're a troll and don't want a discussion. Why shouldn't it be talked about or in your terms, why shouldn't "propaganda" be made about it. It's stated in my initial comment so just reread it | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/09/25 02:01 PM |
| 2 | The cognitive dissonance behind men approaching women is the same cognitive dissonance behind men objectifying women.>So? You need to stop arguing and read my main comment. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/09/25 01:16 PM |
| 3 | The cognitive dissonance behind men approaching women is the same cognitive dissonance behind men objectifying women.That's exactly what everyone learns from childhood: that harming others is wrong. At the same time, aggressive feminist propaganda still remains | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/09/25 01:10 PM |
| 1 | Men's intrasexual competition is just as severe>Any video of a balding man using minoxidil or a toupé will get flooded with negative comments – from OTHER MEN! To be honest, the negative comments about many of these "hair loss aids" are true and actually save men from ED. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/09/25 01:08 PM |
| 3 | The cognitive dissonance behind men approaching women is the same cognitive dissonance behind men objectifying women.Yeah, and it should stop being so aggressive towards men in general and focus on the really bad men. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/09/25 01:04 PM |
| 2 | The cognitive dissonance behind men approaching women is the same cognitive dissonance behind men objectifying women.Exactly, while normal men will have fewer ways to approach women | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/09/25 01:03 PM |
| 1 | If a man tell you to shut-up do you think it’s wise to keep talkingIt's even funnier that you accuse me of not understanding the context when you literally take my words out of context. It seems you have nothing to say, which is why you didn't even try to answer my questions and arguments in the first place 🤷♂️ But again, context hard | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/09/25 08:15 AM |
| 1 | If a man tell you to shut-up do you think it’s wise to keep talkingThe funniest thing is that all your bravado about how aggressive men are, how they end up in jail, and how women are perfectly aware of how to avoid violence - completely contradicts your own life experience, that you haven't experienced physical violence in response to your aggressive behavior. This proves that men understand perfectly well when violence is appropriate and when it isn't, and that, for example, with women (who are objectively weaker), one should be more careful and gentle. And l… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/09/25 07:30 AM |
| 0 | If a man tell you to shut-up do you think it’s wise to keep talking>men are logical and rational, and emotions are for women I need for you to quote where OP said the bolded text I have no idea what wasn't clear about what I said >It's not "necessary" but it happens anyway, that's just human nature >Hitting someone because they raised their voice also isn't necessary, is it? Yeah, it's human nature as well - physical confrontations Raising your voice at someone, also isn't necessary, is it? Especially at someone who is stronger than you >Literally every word of… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/09/25 07:10 AM |
| 1 | If a man tell you to shut-up do you think it’s wise to keep talkingWell, yeah, it's like many women simply desire permissiveness. Like, "I can hit him and insult him, but he can't! Hehehe." It's like they don't understand that insulting anyone is almost never necessary in the first place, and that you need to be able to read social cues and understand when to "shut up." I made a post here six months ago in response to a post from TwoX about a situation where a girl attacked a drunk guy who hadn't done anything to her, and then demanded that her boyfriend "help … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/09/25 07:04 AM |
| 0 | If a man tell you to shut-up do you think it’s wise to keep talking>men are logical and rational, and emotions are for women Feel free to quote where OP said that and we can have that conversation >Seems like we're not the ones who need to be lectured to about this >I've yelled during a lot of arguments It seems that it is necessary after all, because you don’t understand that shouting during arguments is also not necessary in the first place, because it is a conflict-generating situation. >Most people, as I've said in my comments, can argue without being viole… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/09/25 06:59 AM |
| 1 | If a man tell you to shut-up do you think it’s wise to keep talkingHonestly, I thought women would support this post, since they're "in constant danger from men." But it seems they don't care about their own safety at all. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/09/25 06:24 AM |
| 0 | If a man tell you to shut-up do you think it’s wise to keep talkingBut I thought women were pathologically afraid of men because men are such aggressive animals... How is it that women seem to have no idea when it's time to distance themselves from aggressive people, rather than double down on arguing with them? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/09/25 06:22 AM |
| 5 | The cognitive dissonance behind men approaching women is the same cognitive dissonance behind men objectifying women.>They're also meant for people for whom unacceptable behaviours might have been normalized, portrayed as common and not as bad. Their opinion can be changed when they learn how important boundaries are These men already respect women's boundaries and pose no threat. Whereas truly aggressive men don't care what women say. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/09/25 06:19 AM |
| 1 | The cognitive dissonance behind men approaching women is the same cognitive dissonance behind men objectifying women.What you said sounds like you deliberately ignored my text. I'm saying that propaganda promoting good things aimed at protecting women only works on those who can listen to it for longer than five minutes. And these people are ALREADY against violence in general, at the very least, and most often also believe in gender equality and feminism. Real rapists, misogynists, and so on don't give a damn what women say, so they'll continue to do what they've been doing, like aggressively harassing women,… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/09/25 06:18 AM |
| 28 | The cognitive dissonance behind men approaching women is the same cognitive dissonance behind men objectifying women.The main problem here is not even the constant contradiction that many women constantly fall into or even the double standards that they use, but that their propaganda of pro-feminist things at best does not work, and at worst harms women themselves. Simply because the female opinion about what is creepy and scary, how to avoid misogyny, that you should not approach women, that wanting sex and lust is bad, that a man is completely safe in the world and a woman is not, etc., is listened to ONLY b… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 16/09/25 06:14 PM |
| 3 | Men who want casual sex, why women should want that?>When i read discussion about orgasm gap there were a lot of selfish men who didn't see anything that they should do, basically women's responsibility to have orgasm, and some straight away told that she should use toys or fingers and that's on her. The question is why would women want to have sex with men then? It's probably because these men are somehow attractive enough to be desired even though they are selfish. Indeed, if a man is selfish and doesn't care at all about a woman's pleasure (no… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 16/09/25 02:42 PM |
| 1 | If a good personality is not about morality but about sociability, then why are unsuccessful men automatically classified as misogynists?Different pain due to different intentions This is even used in judicial practice from ancient times to the present day. The intentions of the one who does the action are important | /r/PurplePillDebate | 16/09/25 11:02 AM |
| – | Why men aren't as worried about the way they look as women are?>How come men want to have sex but never care if they are sexy? It would make more sense to see men buy foundation and try to attract women by wearing interesting clothes, seeking surgeries. In fact, men are already obsessed with this And quite a few (especially the romantically unsuccessful) are also obsessed with the gym, face, hair transplants, plastic surgery, etc. These are all fairly topical topics and it was necessary to skip a lot so as not to notice it,for example that the same incel cu… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/09/25 07:32 PM |
| 3 | If a good personality is not about morality but about sociability, then why are unsuccessful men automatically classified as misogynists?This is simply their response to people accusing them of being sexually/romantically unsuccessful because they are "misogynists." | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/09/25 03:41 PM |
| 3 | If a good personality is not about morality but about sociability, then why are unsuccessful men automatically classified as misogynists?There is nothing attractive to balance the hate (not that the hate needed at all As you can see she also used these words Does this mean she was talking about physical attractiveness? Oh and yes, the word "hot" is also used not only for physical attractiveness but also for actions when someone behaves sexually. Under my last post, there were many people who said that "good personality" refers specifically to someone's social abilities, and not what kind of person he is in terms of moral qualitie… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/09/25 03:39 PM |
| 6 | If a good personality is not about morality but about sociability, then why are unsuccessful men automatically classified as misogynists?To be upset by loneliness = to be for sexual slavery?... Okay | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/09/25 03:12 PM |
| 3 | If a good personality is not about morality but about sociability, then why are unsuccessful men automatically classified as misogynists?I agree, but some people don't do that. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/09/25 02:58 PM |
| 3 | If a good personality is not about morality but about sociability, then why are unsuccessful men automatically classified as misogynists?Then reread what I wrote to you earlier Oh well | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/09/25 02:54 PM |
| 4 | If a good personality is not about morality but about sociability, then why are unsuccessful men automatically classified as misogynists?Well, considering how persistently you continue to try to smear me with feces, and also go to comments not addressed to you, trying to get approval, then my comment is confirmed more and more each time Very childish and infantile behavior | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/09/25 02:52 PM |
| 3 | If a good personality is not about morality but about sociability, then why are unsuccessful men automatically classified as misogynists?Yeah, and it doesn't affect the fact that I was accused of allegedly misunderstanding our misunderstood genius. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/09/25 02:49 PM |
| 2 | If a good personality is not about morality but about sociability, then why are unsuccessful men automatically classified as misogynists?Partially yes Literally in my OP I am talking about personality as part of sexuality | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/09/25 02:43 PM |
| 8 | If a good personality is not about morality but about sociability, then why are unsuccessful men automatically classified as misogynists?I literally read her comments and asked more about what she said about incels "There is nothing attractive to balance the hate (not that the hate is needed at all)." To which I asked if the whole point is that incels can't compensate for their shittiness? I literally repeated her paragraph And even when she tried to say that I didn't understand her, because she talking about personality, while I was talking about appearance, then even here she was wrong After all, both in my comments and even in… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/09/25 02:41 PM |
| 3 | If a good personality is not about morality but about sociability, then why are unsuccessful men automatically classified as misogynists?unattractive and hot it's not just about the physical | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/09/25 02:39 PM |
| 7 | If a good personality is not about morality but about sociability, then why are unsuccessful men automatically classified as misogynists?You've already had 3 people tell you the opposite, but you also don't seem to care Oh, and your stupid trolling that you tried below and deleted the comment. Do you understand how stupid you look? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/09/25 02:36 PM |
| 4 | If a good personality is not about morality but about sociability, then why are unsuccessful men automatically classified as misogynists?Perhaps you should reread the comments again And pay attention that I wrote not only about physical hotness And even so when she in her comment spoke about personality and her sexuality, I also spoke about a sexual personality even in my OP So, yes, read using the correct sense organ | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/09/25 02:34 PM |
| 0 | If a good personality is not about morality but about sociability, then why are unsuccessful men automatically classified as misogynists?And I didn't write anything only about physical attractiveness And this is her usual arrogant behavior here with a bunch of people, for which she has already been dunked in shit many times But some people are not taught anything | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/09/25 02:32 PM |
| 6 | If a good personality is not about morality but about sociability, then why are unsuccessful men automatically classified as misogynists?At least partially yes | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/09/25 02:30 PM |
| 2 | If a good personality is not about morality but about sociability, then why are unsuccessful men automatically classified as misogynists?Yeah and that's the funniest thing That misogyny is not unattractive in itself to women | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/09/25 01:56 PM |
| 3 | If a good personality is not about morality but about sociability, then why are unsuccessful men automatically classified as misogynists?Honestly, it doesn't matter that they are not "usually usual misogynistic man". They still hold these views, and just hide them | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/09/25 01:55 PM |
| 4 | If a good personality is not about morality but about sociability, then why are unsuccessful men automatically classified as misogynists?Of course, I'm sure that the girls they might date will like it if they support the movement that wants to humiliate and limit women. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/09/25 01:53 PM |
| 2 | If a good personality is not about morality but about sociability, then why are unsuccessful men automatically classified as misogynists?Being »boring and annoying» is less harmful than wanting to limit someone's freedom. Even more so in the context of relationships where people are most vulnerable. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/09/25 01:50 PM |
| 8 | If a good personality is not about morality but about sociability, then why are unsuccessful men automatically classified as misogynists?But this behavior is still not as harmful as intentionally causing harm and discomfort to someone. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/09/25 01:47 PM |
| 5 | If a good personality is not about morality but about sociability, then why are unsuccessful men automatically classified as misogynists?But they still hold a not very positive view of women. Especially not taking into account the manipulations where women want to "lock up" such a guy and then he leaves in search of another "plate" to spin | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/09/25 01:46 PM |
| 3 | If a good personality is not about morality but about sociability, then why are unsuccessful men automatically classified as misogynists?It doesn't change anything. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/09/25 01:44 PM |
| 5 | If a good personality is not about morality but about sociability, then why are unsuccessful men automatically classified as misogynists?>They aren't They do >No, it's quite specifically men who adopt and create misogynistic ideologies to blame everyone else for their lack of success. That is, I am still right and those who blame others for their problems are misogynists Although even this does not matter, because they do not splash out these "misogynistic" theses in real life, where they get the most shit on their heads. So their problems have little in common with | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/09/25 01:43 PM |
| 7 | If a good personality is not about morality but about sociability, then why are unsuccessful men automatically classified as misogynists?>The misogyny is ancillary to the actual crime; being annoying I didn't think that being boring and annoying is a more serious crime than wanting to limit someone's rights and other things This is an interesting view | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/09/25 01:39 PM |
| 7 | If a good personality is not about morality but about sociability, then why are unsuccessful men automatically classified as misogynists?>The misogyny doesn’t help Yeah, but that's not the main problem either. >Just understand that all the criticism is about the garbage personality, not the lack of sex The point is that "garbage personality" is not being a bad person morally, but simply being socially retarded. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/09/25 01:13 PM |
| 2 | If a good personality is not about morality but about sociability, then why are unsuccessful men automatically classified as misogynists?Money? No, but in some situations it may The point is that the main thing is attractiveness in general, and attractiveness itself most often has nothing to do with morality. And therefore, linking someone's sexual/romantic failure with their "hate of people" is stupid. It's the least of their problems | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/09/25 01:09 PM |
| 11 | If a good personality is not about morality but about sociability, then why are unsuccessful men automatically classified as misogynists?>They aren't. They do. >Unsuccessful men who construct and adopt misogynistic ideologies to blame everyone else for why they're unsuccessful are classified as misogynists This is literally anyone who blames someone other than themselves for anything related to their bad life. Especially since incels don't spew bile all over the real world (where incels are most rejected). So their unattractiveness has nothing to do with their "misogyny." | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/09/25 12:59 PM |
| 5 | If a good personality is not about morality but about sociability, then why are unsuccessful men automatically classified as misogynists?>You don’t need to “smell” anything when there are words all around us advocating to stop treating women equally, to celebrate their abuse, to assume they want to be assaulted because of smut books, to slut shame, etc. etc. etc. There is no contradiction with the word "smell" >Welcome to pretty privilege Yeah, so if someone is attractive, they don't necessarily have to be a positive and good person. So the problem is that incels are not attractive to women, not because of their misogyny, but bec… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/09/25 12:52 PM |
| 5 | If a good personality is not about morality but about sociability, then why are unsuccessful men automatically classified as misogynists?Of course, think what's easier for you Besides, she didn't talk only about social skills, but even if so, to be hot, it also wouldn't hurt to be like that personally | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/09/25 12:48 PM |
| 6 | If a good personality is not about morality but about sociability, then why are unsuccessful men automatically classified as misogynists?The point is that it doesn't even matter whether misogynists are incels or not It's just that every time they are accused of being sexual and romantic losers because they are misogynists. That is why they are single, because people can "smell" how evil incels are But at the same time, the paradox is that somehow real misogynists who are hot still get laid and get any relationship they want | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/09/25 12:33 PM |
| 12 | If a good personality is not about morality but about sociability, then why are unsuccessful men automatically classified as misogynists?Many good people also get into situations with assholes It's a projection to think that assholes are isolated from normal people | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/09/25 12:28 PM |
| 5 | If a good personality is not about morality but about sociability, then why are unsuccessful men automatically classified as misogynists?Actually, no, it is not part of "human nature" because such communication does not cause direct harm. Even in the context of primitive bullying of "uncool kids" in school - the concept that these kids are evil does not apply Then it should be that the truly unpleasant and unattractive people would get problems, but it seems that their good communication skills they get a green card | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/09/25 12:27 PM |
| 11 | If a good personality is not about morality but about sociability, then why are unsuccessful men automatically classified as misogynists?Probably yes, considering that I quoted it.... | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/09/25 12:21 PM |
| 2 | If a good personality is not about morality but about sociability, then why are unsuccessful men automatically classified as misogynists?Mutually🤝 | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/09/25 11:16 AM |
| 5 | If a good personality is not about morality but about sociability, then why are unsuccessful men automatically classified as misogynists?Another incoherent rambling and denial when you were literally quoted Usually people outgrow the "I'm a misunderstood genius" phase in kindergarten, but in your case that's not quite true | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/09/25 11:11 AM |
| 7 | If a good personality is not about morality but about sociability, then why are unsuccessful men automatically classified as misogynists?Well, they still don't have any problems with sex and LTR Your fantasies about revenge that they "will be losers" are not relevant here | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/09/25 11:09 AM |
| 6 | If a good personality is not about morality but about sociability, then why are unsuccessful men automatically classified as misogynists?The incoherence is that I quoted her and we both seemed to agree But at the same time she got offended and for some reason tried to insult me that she was not understood again. She did this a couple of times already when she answered me and others This is a childish position and quite infantile | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/09/25 11:08 AM |
| 7 | If a good personality is not about morality but about sociability, then why are unsuccessful men automatically classified as misogynists?>Bad boys don’t get dates because they’re bad, it’s because they have status and confidence and rizz, so in spite of being bad boys they get girls >Whereas being “nice and decent” isn’t enough to attract a partner no matter the gender, looks matter, personality and values matter, a man might not get dates despite him being nice because he lack other qualities people look for in a partner, nice doesn’t cut it. That's right, that is, moral qualities are not the decisive factor here. Aspects of att… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/09/25 11:05 AM |
| 6 | If a good personality is not about morality but about sociability, then why are unsuccessful men automatically classified as misogynists?Attractive Misogynists Still Get Fucked So yeah, the problem here is definitely not being a bad person | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/09/25 10:46 AM |
| 4 | If a good personality is not about morality but about sociability, then why are unsuccessful men automatically classified as misogynists?For some reason I am not surprised when you write incoherent comments, people quote them and then you write even more incoherence | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/09/25 10:45 AM |
| 10 | If a good personality is not about morality but about sociability, then why are unsuccessful men automatically classified as misogynists?Yeah, I think so too That's why I don't like it when any guy with problems with romance and who is unhappy about it is called a misogynist. This is most often the "least" of their flaws on the path to romantic success. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/09/25 10:44 AM |
| 19 | If a good personality is not about morality but about sociability, then why are unsuccessful men automatically classified as misogynists?>So they struggle to comprehend that being weird and awkward alone is enough to result in a dude becoming a complete outcast who can't get laid. There's gotta be something going wrong for him that isn't going wrong for men in their weird eccentric social circles and one of the easiest things to point to is what would get a dude ousted from their own circles of found family weirdos: being a prick. But then again, being a "weird kid" and collecting rocks doesn't make someone a moral monster and a … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/09/25 10:39 AM |
| 8 | If a good personality is not about morality but about sociability, then why are unsuccessful men automatically classified as misogynists?But I literally quoted you... | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/09/25 10:37 AM |
| 24 | If a good personality is not about morality but about sociability, then why are unsuccessful men automatically classified as misogynists?>Because the men who are loudest about struggling to get dates are shouting things like “feminism was a mistake! women are incapable of holding themselves accountable for me being single!” But then again, there are plenty of men who promote anti-women/anti-feminist theses and are still successful So it seems that the main obstacle here is not misogyny >So the shitty men are speaking for everyone. What I noticed is that this is only because the most aggressive incels and others are constantly bei… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/09/25 10:36 AM |
| 9 | If a good personality is not about morality but about sociability, then why are unsuccessful men automatically classified as misogynists?>You don’t need to be women to feel the misogynistic part It seems that this is not true, because then fuckboys, cheaters, etc. would not have a constant line of women wanting them So the problem here is clearly not misogyny | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/09/25 10:29 AM |
| 7 | If a good personality is not about morality but about sociability, then why are unsuccessful men automatically classified as misogynists?In fact, every time a man simply states something like, "I'm a decent, nice guy, and why do I have problems - where the "bad boys" don't have them?" they are already labeled as misogynists. Although wanting your positive qualities to be considered more attractive is not misogynistic at all. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/09/25 10:28 AM |
| 11 | If a good personality is not about morality but about sociability, then why are unsuccessful men automatically classified as misogynists?>With incels they have no social skills it seems. So basically they wear their hate on a sleeve for all to see, they lead with it, and they make women feel hated. Who wants that?? And that’s what people mean mostly when they say that they are misogynists. There is nothing attractive to balance the hate (not that the hate needed at all). So the problem with incels and others is not being misogynists and such, but that they are unattractive and therefore do not compensate for their shittiness? The… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/09/25 10:26 AM |
| 2 | Pair bonding a lot actually increases your ability to pair bond. Being on this subreddit might be damaging your ability to pair bond.Yeah, it has an effect whether you want it or not. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/09/25 04:23 AM |
| 3 | N COUNTS WEEKLY DISCUSSION THREAD>there is still no way n count is the best way to judge manipulation skills It shouldn't be like that anyway. >why not just use a better technique to avoid a manipulative person, and therefore avoid mortal danger? Avoiding people whose n-count is higher than yours is already a good technique to reduce the risk of getting into a toxic relationship This of course does not mean that all overly sexual people are manipulators, but they simply have more leverage and experience (due to the variety and … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/09/25 08:05 PM |
| 6 | N COUNTS WEEKLY DISCUSSION THREADI do think that a partner with a higher n-count is more likely to have a greater overall power of seduction and manipulation And therefore it is almost mortally dangerous for someone with a lower n-count to be in a relationship with them. And no, it does not matter at all if those with a lower n-count have had longer relationships. All the same, the length of these relationships does not compensate for the lack of experience, especially considering if there was no marriage | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/09/25 06:51 PM |
| 2 | N COUNTS WEEKLY DISCUSSION THREADBecause earlier, a couple of years ago, there were a lot of posts on this topic And so it was decided to make a separate topic every week, but at the same time block it in the main | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/09/25 06:48 PM |
| 3 | N COUNTS WEEKLY DISCUSSION THREADThe one who thinks that my dick is 10/10 (hits all the spots, etc. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/09/25 06:45 PM |
| 3 | If there are "redeeming traits" that can allow someone to be an asshole, then that kind of shows that they are more important.And if so, this attraction is every bit as real and primal as anything those who do experience a strong pull at first sight would experience. To be honest, no, it is of course an attraction But it is definitely not as primal and spontaneous as something based on pure attraction Autistic men and people who harbor these views, miss this all the time, and shoot themselves in the foot by imagining that every woman simply throws herself at men she finds attractive when most people date with curiosity… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/09/25 05:30 PM |
| 5 | If there are "redeeming traits" that can allow someone to be an asshole, then that kind of shows that they are more important.That's right, so being "morally" good is not necessary to be successful romantically Just as not being a misogynist is not necessary either, because attractive people are always successful | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/09/25 04:23 PM |
| 2 | If there are "redeeming traits" that can allow someone to be an asshole, then that kind of shows that they are more important.Most likely it is like this: "If you always prefer pizza to tacos, but constantly claim that you really like tacos, then you are a liar. And if you constantly watch horror movies, but claim that you can't live without comedies, then you are also a liar." | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/09/25 04:21 PM |
| 3 | If there are "redeeming traits" that can allow someone to be an asshole, then that kind of shows that they are more important.>Almost nothing in relationships is "binary." It is, there are such things The same attraction is binary, it either exists or it doesn’t. >There is some argument to the importance of personality, but that implies at least some level of attractiveness or at least being average That's right, that is, being a "good person" is not the main thing that attracts >The attractive aspects of personality boil down to how you make her feel. Banter, flirting, chemistry, humor, intellectual stimulation if she… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/09/25 04:17 PM |
| 3 | If there are "redeeming traits" that can allow someone to be an asshole, then that kind of shows that they are more important.In general yes, but since some commentators also mentioned that a good personality is not being a good empathetic person, but qualities that make someone seductive, then this may be the case here too | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/09/25 04:05 PM |
| 8 | Why do you feel pressured to pursue women?Because even liberal women usually don't take the initiative with men? Even considering that most of my past relationships were women who took the initiative with me (even inviting me on dates initially), but even I wasn't spared this | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/09/25 01:51 PM |
| 4 | If there are "redeeming traits" that can allow someone to be an asshole, then that kind of shows that they are more important.Yes? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/09/25 01:25 PM |
| 5 | If there are "redeeming traits" that can allow someone to be an asshole, then that kind of shows that they are more important.>Everyone is good and bad at different times Reread my comment again, bro | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/09/25 01:23 PM |
| 5 | If there are "redeeming traits" that can allow someone to be an asshole, then that kind of shows that they are more important.So being a moral monster and even a misogynist does not prevent them from being successful 🤷♂️ | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/09/25 01:22 PM |
| 6 | If there are "redeeming traits" that can allow someone to be an asshole, then that kind of shows that they are more important.>There is no such thing as “good” or “bad” is what they’re saying There are objective things that make someone a good and a bad person All this "gray morality" and that you can be good and bad at the same time is bullshit and is justifiably used only in a very small percentage of cases. And in most cases, it is used by objectively bad people who feel bad and try to justify themselves I'll give you an example: my home country was attacked and every day and night they are shelled, unironically, by… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/09/25 01:20 PM |
| 2 | If there are "redeeming traits" that can allow someone to be an asshole, then that kind of shows that they are more important.>What if being an asshole IS the redeeming trait? So we're working with wrong assumptions to begin with It may be, and unfortunately I also sometimes think that it is true more and more >So we're working with wrong assumptions to begin with. When they say "work on your personality", they don't mean "be a nice guy feminist ally". To be honest, it's funny that one of the users just above left exactly this comment That this is exactly what it is about and "being a good person" does not mean moral a… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/09/25 08:23 AM |
| 0 | Pair bonding a lot actually increases your ability to pair bond. Being on this subreddit might be damaging your ability to pair bond.Mutual🤝 | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/09/25 08:15 AM |
| 7 | If there are "redeeming traits" that can allow someone to be an asshole, then that kind of shows that they are more important.But they're still assholes. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/09/25 08:13 AM |
| 7 | If there are "redeeming traits" that can allow someone to be an asshole, then that kind of shows that they are more important.>A good personally is someone who is fun to spend time with and makes you feel good about yourself when you're with them So it's not about being a good, empathetic, compassionate person. Good to know, so men who are accused of being single because of misogyny actually have no problem being an asshole. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/09/25 08:13 AM |
| 3 | If there are "redeeming traits" that can allow someone to be an asshole, then that kind of shows that they are more important.>Everyone is an asshole sometimes But some can be like that all the time and to a greater extent than others Being an asshole and forgetting to buy milk again is not the same as being an asshole because someone systematically cheat in all relationships >It’s very rare to find someone that likes the “asshole” part It doesn't really matter as long as these same people will put up with someone else's shitty behavior while the other person is hot. They'll still share that being an asshole isn't a re… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/09/25 08:07 AM |
| 3 | Pair bonding a lot actually increases your ability to pair bond. Being on this subreddit might be damaging your ability to pair bond.Luckily I won't work on "resentment issues". Simply because there is nothing to work on. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/09/25 08:03 AM |
| 4 | Pair bonding a lot actually increases your ability to pair bond. Being on this subreddit might be damaging your ability to pair bond.No, it definitely has an effect.🤷♂️ Whether you like it or not | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/09/25 07:31 AM |
| 1 | Pair bonding a lot actually increases your ability to pair bond. Being on this subreddit might be damaging your ability to pair bond.>Hopefully none Then everything is fine, thanks for reassuring me | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/09/25 07:31 AM |
| 3 | Pair bonding a lot actually increases your ability to pair bond. Being on this subreddit might be damaging your ability to pair bond.It's funny that it affects men and women There have also been studies that have proven that women also use this as an important criterion for evaluating men and may also not want a high number men | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/09/25 07:11 AM |
| 2 | Pair bonding a lot actually increases your ability to pair bond. Being on this subreddit might be damaging your ability to pair bond.At first I even wanted to agree with the post until I saw that it was trolling and... >It's not really about how many people you loved or how many people you broke up with. Well, this kind of contradicts your idea, because if it is important who and how became offended by life, then isn't it also important the number of times it happened? It's literally a multiplier of the bitterness effect And... Does the amount of hours spent here also have an effect? I want to understand how much my pair bo… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/09/25 07:09 AM |
| 2 | Red pill ‘truths’ are just excuses to frame hierarchy as biologyYou too Like learning to read too | /r/PurplePillDebate | 13/09/25 06:15 PM |
| 1 | Red pill ‘truths’ are just excuses to frame hierarchy as biologySince you don't read my comments and don't read my proofs and examples, and also don't answer my questions, then I consider this discussion over Have a nice day | /r/PurplePillDebate | 13/09/25 06:05 PM |
| – | Red pill ‘truths’ are just excuses to frame hierarchy as biologyAgain I already gave you that And yes, show me where autistic men have as many relationships as autistic women | /r/PurplePillDebate | 13/09/25 05:20 PM |
| 1 | Red pill ‘truths’ are just excuses to frame hierarchy as biologyYes, to be honest. I try not to lead to such stupid trolling but unfortunately I lack the patience here | /r/PurplePillDebate | 13/09/25 04:46 PM |
| – | Red pill ‘truths’ are just excuses to frame hierarchy as biology>What? I haven't seen that comment but that is completely irrelevant Well, here you go, if you missed it. >Some do. According to a tiny sample selection The fact that for you , evidence is not evidence is not my problem, sorry | /r/PurplePillDebate | 13/09/25 04:45 PM |
| – | Red pill ‘truths’ are just excuses to frame hierarchy as biology>There you go again, using your life as the measuring stick. You just can't help yourself, can you. Yeah, that also applies to you. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 13/09/25 04:31 PM |
| – | Red pill ‘truths’ are just excuses to frame hierarchy as biologyMen follow social traditional norms only because it brings them success with women. If being softer, more passive, etc. was more ineffective, then men would do it But as long as women continue to choose more traditional men, then nothing will change. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 13/09/25 04:22 PM |
| – | Red pill ‘truths’ are just excuses to frame hierarchy as biologyI will then hope that everything that I and millions of men saw will remain "fan fiction for you". I envy you that your sheltered lifestyle allows you to remain infantile even in adulthood | /r/PurplePillDebate | 13/09/25 04:20 PM |
| – | Red pill ‘truths’ are just excuses to frame hierarchy as biologyJust like you didn't answer under another post that autistic men are significantly more lonely than women And especially since I answered that relationships do go down the drain. Because divorces are shit | /r/PurplePillDebate | 13/09/25 04:17 PM |
| – | Red pill ‘truths’ are just excuses to frame hierarchy as biology>Your logic is that because I don't agree with you, I must have 0 life experiences. No, it's because you really don't have life experience while I and millions of men have seen it. It's not an insult but a fact For you, all the bad things that can happen in life because of women are "fan fiction and revenge fantasies" precisely because of this. And in the past, we have repeatedly found this out when I asked if you saw anything and you answered that you didn't. So don't be offended at me for tell… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 13/09/25 04:15 PM |
| – | Red pill ‘truths’ are just excuses to frame hierarchy as biologyYes, they are and here is a small example If you want more, then Google will help you | /r/PurplePillDebate | 13/09/25 04:07 PM |
| – | Red pill ‘truths’ are just excuses to frame hierarchy as biologyPerfect example of 0 life experience | /r/PurplePillDebate | 13/09/25 03:47 PM |
| – | Red pill ‘truths’ are just excuses to frame hierarchy as biologyOf course, selfish people who want to get the experience that most women get | /r/PurplePillDebate | 13/09/25 03:40 PM |
| 3 | Women do not fall for "manipulation" as much as they want to think they doNo, because your information is completely false. 16% of autistic men are in a relationship compared to 46% of autistic women. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 13/09/25 03:37 PM |
| – | Red pill ‘truths’ are just excuses to frame hierarchy as biologyThe problem here is that women, even liberal ones, still support all these values. There is still a strong disdain for less successful men. For the same reasons, relationships where the woman is more successful - inevitably descend into shit and abuse. As well as the same relationships where the man is "less valuable" if they even start, because pre-selection is a thing no matter what anyone says. Just as most (not all) even liberal women do not want their husband to be passive, even they outsou… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 13/09/25 03:26 PM |
| 8 | Why do straight women say dating women would be “easier”? Even though it's notThe funniest thing is that lesbians and bi-women often have a less than positive attitude towards hetero women. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 13/09/25 03:15 PM |
| 1 | Men and women are referring to different things when they talk about attraction which causes all the confusion>By men's definition, they are right. Women at large don't have visceral and immediately sexual feelings about the overwhelming majority of men. It's why when a random man get's naked in public, a woman is more likely to look away and call the police, than she is to ask for his phone number. Men typically need to be outrageously good looking for a woman to see them and think they want him on the spot Yeah, and men are right, because they talk about lust and not love in general. And men experienc… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 13/09/25 07:23 AM |
| 0 | Q4 people who believe that promiscuity damages a womans capacity to "pair-bond" --why doesn't having generally good life, good family etc. also damage a womans capacity to pair bond?>They [the based and redpilled real men of the manosphere] also do warn against pursuing widows (especially those who had happy marriages before), as she would always pine for the love of her life and will compare her current partner with the idealized image of the past cut short It's just a fact, especially considering that after death, even a not very good person can be credited with good qualities that he did not have before. I used to browse through resources and subreddits for the sake of i… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 13/09/25 07:05 AM |
| 7 | Why do men gaslight women here?But I literally answered all your questions...😔 | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/09/25 01:25 PM |
| 12 | Why do men gaslight women here?>For example there is a lot of shaming women with high body count, calling them low value, trash, laughing stock etc. I've asked a question related to it and the answer were "that doesn't happen". And maybe this specific man didn't shame, but he has to be blind not to notice other do. While I've seen examples of slut-shaming, most often these women are called "low value" and to be honest, this is not an insult but a fact. They will be objectively rated lower than others This does not mean that t… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/09/25 01:20 PM |
| 4 | People hate male insecurities for two reasons.>You believing men “work harder” is exactly saying that Women don’t work as hard as men No, it's a fact. >I’m not devaluing anyone. Again I’m calling out how common it is. And I will repeat that catcalling is not the same as real rape No one should ever be subjected to violence and there is no fucking point in inventing it where it does not exist | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/09/25 09:00 AM |
| 5 | People hate male insecurities for two reasons.>Women are never as hard working as men Don't twist my words. It's just that men work harder on average. >1 in 4 is a fact. Again you are dismissing womens issues. No. Stop fucking devaluing real victims of abuse. >That’s a other thing males insecurities do, they dismiss womens issues so they don’t have to take responsibility Stop shifting responsibility to men. I take it upon myself | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/09/25 08:48 AM |
| 6 | People hate male insecurities for two reasons.>Gender roles? Not so much in 2025 when everyone’s working. The fact that women work does not mean that they are as hardworking as men The last time I saw information about this, in addition to higher wages for men (which some stupid women complain about), it was also attached to the fact that men have more work experience, overtime, etc. So it doesn't make any sense at all that "supposedly everyone works" when for most families the main income still comes from the man >Womens insecurities are a… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/09/25 08:05 AM |
| 2 | Women are instructed to believed "all men bad" by other menWhat I have always seen is that children (both boys and girls) are taught not to be wary of men only, but of everyone in general And the same goes for me, when I participate in raising my younger relatives, it is always about being wary of bad people in GENERAL, not by gender Otherwise, it would be necessary to teach girls to be afraid of other women and not men, because men are already treated as monsters in society, while women enjoy much more trust and therefore are dangerous, because they ca… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 11/09/25 02:28 PM |
| 1 | Women don't deny they like attractive men. They deny that they are all attracted to the same menThey still belong to the same type of traditionally attractive men. There is not a huge range of wildly different looking men between them If it was the difference between Jason Mamoa and Jonah Hill, for example, then yes, it would be a huge range of wildly different looking men. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 11/09/25 01:34 PM |
| 3 | Women don't deny they like attractive men. They deny that they are all attracted to the same menDamn, Timothee Chalamet is literally the type of traditionally attractive man and his jaw could cut paper If someone likes him, then good, but it's not a sign of any "refined" taste at all, lol | /r/PurplePillDebate | 11/09/25 01:19 PM |
| 20 | Women don't deny they like attractive men. They deny that they are all attracted to the same menIt's not that all women are attracted to the same type of attractiveness It's that the traits that most (not all!) women find attractive are similar. Like: tall guy > average guy > short guy Guy with masculine (sharper features) > guy with softer but still masculine features > effeminate guy Guy with a V-shaped silhouette and toned muscles (not a 650 pound bodybuilder) > skinny guy > fat guy Guy with thick hair > guy with moderate hair > bald guy (especially at a young age) Again, it's not that … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 11/09/25 01:14 PM |
| 1 | People who are disgusted by only female promiscuity see men as inferiorThe point is that someone who has a head start in something will most likely be assessed worse than someone who was in a more disadvantageous position and achieved success in something. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/09/25 04:28 PM |
| 1 | When did the narrative shift from "it's your personality and misogyny that keeping you single" to "ofc women love attractive men, are you a stupid shut in!!" ?I don’t know what you want me to respond to here I have to ask this Because my original comment was literally not addressed to you. Just like it didn't discuss the rules of reddit or anything else you wrote to me, but literally the topic of the post (about BlueP's changing views on the importance of appearance) So you're probably still drunk I advise you to drink mineral water or brine, it will help restore electrolytes. Well, and eat something warm and light like chicken broth. It will also hel… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/09/25 02:52 PM |
| 1 | When did the narrative shift from "it's your personality and misogyny that keeping you single" to "ofc women love attractive men, are you a stupid shut in!!" ?The rest of my comments have been responding to big mad triggered sensitive boys who replied to that comment And at the same time there are so many insults that for just one comment such a big RP would get a 10-day ban This is the weakest personal insult I’ve ever encountered. This is not an insult, but simply a statement of fact. Get a fucking grip You too And you probably missed that I understand why the rules on the sub are so biased? And that I don't blame the mods as such I’m not “blue.” I … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/09/25 02:30 PM |
| 2 | When did the narrative shift from "it's your personality and misogyny that keeping you single" to "ofc women love attractive men, are you a stupid shut in!!" ?Yeah, sure. That's why you just threw out a few comments openly calling men here shit So if you really are from the wedding then I hope you're just still drunk, because a functional adult doesn't behave like that I'm honestly getting more and more upset and my comment still stands. Now all the mods here are completely blue and that's a little upsetting, even though it's clear that this is because of reddit rules | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/09/25 02:15 PM |
| 1 | When did the narrative shift from "it's your personality and misogyny that keeping you single" to "ofc women love attractive men, are you a stupid shut in!!" ?I don’t remember what? WTH is Anal week? I didn't say you don't remember this exactly But yeah, "Anal Week" is a funny thing they called the constant appearance of posts on the topic of n-count. Like: "My girlfriend had anal sex with her ex but she doesn't want to with me, what should I do(" Unless you wanted this sub quarantined like all of the overs subs that demographic ruined, I reckon none of you know what the fuck you’re talking about I know that most of the PP and other people have left h… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/09/25 02:04 PM |
| 8 | When did the narrative shift from "it's your personality and misogyny that keeping you single" to "ofc women love attractive men, are you a stupid shut in!!" ?The most scary thing here is that you don't understand whether she and the others are pretending not to remember anything or not Like I've been on this subreddit less than her in time, but I came here when "Anal week" was popular and the topic about the number of partners was banned And I fucking remember the complete dominance of bluepill's narrative here that "if you don't have romantic success, then you're a misogynist". And this despite the fact that back then there were still a lot of aweso… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/09/25 05:24 AM |
| 13 | When did the narrative shift from "it's your personality and misogyny that keeping you single" to "ofc women love attractive men, are you a stupid shut in!!" ?What's wrong with these women? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 09/09/25 08:48 PM |
| 3 | How many dates should a woman wait to have sex, in your opinion?It seems then when it is convenient for both of us But it is also necessary that we both be ready as quickly as possible. And not for sex as such, but for almost any kind of foreplay or tactile contact - so that even without sex it is clear that we are attracted to each other. If there is no manifestation of sexuality from her, then I turn it off, because I do not need a sexless relationship or, God forbid, a relationship in which I need to "conquer" her. Just as I can wait for sex itself for a … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 09/09/25 08:45 PM |
| 2 | Quick reference guide to debunking myths spread by the manosphere>Nope. This is literally the most basic statistical measure. As well as what is the average statistical measure Well, okay, it doesn't matter >But it doesn't tell you anything about what each individual woman rated photos This tells us that 80% of the men were rated as below average overall. And we don't need to know how a particular woman rated a particular man, because on average, all women individually rated all men as below average So there is a cross-section there And this is also the most … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 09/09/25 08:33 PM |
| 5 | Quick reference guide to debunking myths spread by the manosphere>Because you don't understand the most basic statistics. A mean value says nothing about individual values Well, or you are simply mistaken and overestimating your knowledge Because there is an average statistical value that comes from individual women. If the majority of women rate some supposedly their "personal" as many as 80% of men as unattractive, then there is a crossover. After all, these same men will be shown to other women who, surprisingly, will rate them as unattractive too >Nope, t… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 09/09/25 08:14 PM |
| 6 | Quick reference guide to debunking myths spread by the manosphere>The survey found 80% of messages were sent to men who were "average" or lower, while 66% of messages from men were to the top 1/3 of women. Yeah, you don't take into account that the women there openly admitted that most men were below average I don't know how that improves the situation other than it proves the RP theory about "settling" and betabucks >While women do swipe right less frequently, women only swiping on 5% of men does not mean women are swiping right on the same 5% of men. Trying… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 09/09/25 07:28 PM |
| 1 | How exactly should men need to hold other men accountable?This is normal and no more is required of you if you do not have a family. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 08/09/25 04:35 PM |
| 1 | How exactly should men need to hold other men accountable?Just the rules of life won't work, here we may need to talk about more specific things And the same with dating, there is a separate dynamic and other skills are needed to compare with just life in society or even friendship Especially since it was you who said "standards", and not me | /r/PurplePillDebate | 08/09/25 04:30 PM |
| 1 | How exactly should men need to hold other men accountable?Yeah, nothing that I denied🤷♂️ | /r/PurplePillDebate | 08/09/25 04:22 PM |
| 5 | DISCUSSION🗨️ ABOUT MAIN PPD POSTS📮, LOOKS👀, AND N-COUNT🔢 ARE RESTRICTED🚫 FROM THE DAILY🌞 MEGATHREAD🧵This is not a way to help, but often just an attempt to shut men up. Or even worse, to humiliate and point out supposed "mental problems" that often do not exist | /r/PurplePillDebate | 08/09/25 04:17 PM |
| 1 | How exactly should men need to hold other men accountable?>But it's up to them to decide what those standards are. Unfortunately, this doesn't work very well, because some standards can also be harmful and toxic.And these women won't be able to find out because of their lack of experience. I try to give my sister more direct advice about protection | /r/PurplePillDebate | 08/09/25 04:14 PM |
| 5 | How exactly should men need to hold other men accountable?>Basically "men should fall on the sword for our sake." Unfortunately, many women will not do the same for men. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 08/09/25 04:12 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter