TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

CunningLanguageUser Archive

View 2 posts and 105 comments by CunningLanguageUser on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

A big beanbag or two is perfect for this situation. Plop down on the beanbag together (usually they're pretty cosy for two people) and watch whatever on your computer that's presumably on your desk. A makeshift couch that naturally leads to intimacy.
/r/seduction25/10/14 10:26 AM
1

This is a laborious way of doing this. And you're definitely not radiating 'fun' if you're scanning the room like the terminator to see who's checking you out. If you need an invitation to approach, initiate the eye contact yourself when she's oriented in a way that she would notice you. Don't stare but look long enough that it would be possible to get attention. You can try a few times before you're getting creepy and should move on. After locking eyes, her looking away isn't bad or necessarily…
/r/seduction25/05/14 02:58 AM
1

Your question is making assumptions about what game actually is. When you boil it down, game can be seen as just methods of effectively communicating the values that make you an attractive mate. The attributes that are attractive are not particularly surprising and are universal, but girls are not all attracted to the them to the exact same degree (or even look for the same thing as themselves at a different point of their life -- or even menstrual cycle). However, in the end, girls more or less…
/r/seduction25/05/14 02:41 AM
1

'Guess.' Suddenly you're now dictating the interaction.
/r/seduction16/10/13 12:17 AM
3

You're gonna need a bigger pre-selection. If they know you're screwing girls more attractive than they are, next time you speak to them while keeping a frame of any deceny, things will fall into place. Of course, if you're already in that position...
/r/seduction06/06/13 12:25 AM
2

You're allowed to hit on anyone so long as they're of age to give consent. Think of a mentally strong man, like Arnie or Sean Connery, and put their mind into your body. They're not going to spend time considering whether they're in league or not, they're just going to do it regardless. Normally I just count my facial features that are unattractive (4) and try to find as many on a girls, if it's not at least 4 also I won't do anything. What the fuck? This is the most unhealthy selection process …
/r/seduction12/05/13 04:15 PM
3

You should just think of 'game' as a collection of attributes that contribute overall attractiveness, not as something separate. Does becoming more attractive increase the pool of girls that will be attracted to you?
/r/seduction02/05/13 07:17 PM
5

Not my greatest triumph in terms of enlightenment or anything, but one of my favourite times was when I was so care-free and I didn't have a job to get up for. I had three dates three days in a row with some very attractive girls (admittedly I'd known them all for quite some time) and £40 in my bank account. On the fourth day I had a threesome with girls 2 and 3. Still working on the foursome but I don't want to push anyone into something like that and girl 1 has deep reservations. I'd sure like…
/r/seduction30/04/13 09:26 PM
1

Note what others have said about the friends. Anyway, I looked at your pictures, and the only thing I can really say about them is that you're don't really seem to project a dominating presence. If you can get yourself in the shape the way you have, you can definitely fix this too. In the picture where you're sitting down, you look a bit defensive and uncomfortable pulling your shoulders up? Your arm doesn't look like it's sitting there naturally. In the dog picture, you're raising your eyebrows…
/r/seduction30/04/13 08:58 PM
2

Obviously hindsight is 20/20 but you shouldn't fall into his frame as has been previously mentioned. There's no need to acknowledge another's questions, and dismissing white knights can be done effectively by allowing them to be the one that crosses the boundary. I can't remember the proper name, something like violation theory, but the stuff is gold. You frame the situation that he's a weirdo for butting in, and that he's the one that's violated social conduct, the unspoken rules of engagement.…
/r/seduction30/04/13 08:16 PM
2

Agreeing too much is actually dangerous itself. I'd actually say there is little to lose in disagreeing, especially because it's so common for other men to do it. It also means when you do agree on something, it's much more meaningful. Girls don't want you to change your behaviour for them, in fact it's disingenuous. Own your opinions, it's attractive. If the question is more about how to do so smoothly, well this applies to everyone you meet in life. You can be laid back and matter of fact abou…
/r/seduction13/04/13 08:10 PM
0

Looking for quality we have [2] http://www.manolith.com/2010/01/06/top-15-countries-with-the-hottest-women/ . In my experience where there's a lot of money, there are the hottest women: NYC, LA, Paris, Tokyo, London.... I don't agree there's that strong a correlation with this. Those cities you've named are huge population hubs. I've only been to London and Paris of those listed and it struck me than when in a working environment with a fixed selection of people, you usually don't get much bette…
/r/seduction08/03/13 07:14 PM
1

Fuck.
/r/seduction29/01/13 11:23 PM
2

Focus on having interesting inflection and emphasis. Don't just be talking, sound like you're meaning something. A semi-unpredictable pattern of emphasis in your voice will rivet attention to what your saying so easily. Of course, don't be annoying with it.
/r/seduction27/05/12 12:46 PM
1

More confidence is never really going to do any harm provided one still remains something of a 'real' person and can convey vulnerability at times necessary for deeper intimacy. But yes, it's not linear, there are somewhat diminishing returns once you're 'confident enough', but it will never truly level off as confidence itself leads to taking chances, which effectively means the more confident, the wider the net will always be cast. I don't buy that this means the more confident people become, …
/r/seduction26/02/12 05:38 PM
1

Pro tip: Dancing with the mindset of light-hearted making fun of the whole situation with perhaps a bit of obvious exaggerated imitation gives your brain a defence or excuse of sorts and goes a long way to removing shyness. You weren't 'serious'. That's when you realise that dancing is itself more to do with confidently doing whatever you want, than what you actually do. Once that settled in, I could dance genuinely.
/r/seduction26/02/12 05:28 PM
1

Can't remember where I first discovered it, but works like a charm every single fucking time for me: After you've got her revved up: Suck area over clit to create a sort of vacuum. Keep your teeth back. Spreeead your tongue wide. We're going for maximum surface area contact here. Without making your tongue pointy, i.e. don't undo last step, steadily circle her clit with your tongue, focusing the pressure on the 'edges' as much as possible, but still keeping contact in the middle. Enjoy her orgas…
/r/seduction14/02/12 07:08 AM
1

Unless I had an extremely cushy number, I'd accept a reasonable amount of discomfort in my job order to take my pick of the talent. It's not like your job is likely to be great fun in the first place. Almost all discomfort and drama is manageable. Just don't react to the nonsense or take it too seriously. Just keep it all above board inside the work place.
/r/seduction13/02/12 09:57 AM
2

Solid game.
/r/seduction01/02/12 11:11 PM
2

It's fine.
/r/seduction31/01/12 08:31 PM
2

It's not actually the smile. Look at the picture, and what is your impression of the man? Compared to the other pictures, it's the most supplicating. This is why it's rated badly, not truly because of the smile. Basically, smile away if you smile like a boss.
/r/seduction31/01/12 07:22 PM
13

And even if they are, it's usually a sort of smirk. I'd say that smirking is actually often the best choice - self-assured and dominant.
/r/seduction31/01/12 07:18 PM
1

Everything everyone's said is true. Your stories don't have to be epic. It can help, but it's not necessary. Comedians' stories, for example, are often common day-to-day observations that everyone experiences, and it helps. In fact, if your stories are too good, your stories can be more memorable than you, which isn't always that useful. I'd avoid making stuff up, especially not big stuff that will bite you in the ass down the line. That's just retarded. If you really can't think of anything, ma…
/r/seduction24/01/12 02:43 PM
1

You'll probably never get it either because you're not particularly skinny sounding. You have a BMI of 23, which is closer to overweight than underweight (though still very firmly in normal --), and you apparently don't work out to skew the calculation.
/r/seduction24/01/12 02:29 PM
8

Don't get what could be considered offensive about this. Being told you kick ass without doing anything is nice, even if you find the people sexually undesirable. Regardless of the gender...
/r/seduction24/01/12 07:25 AM
1

I've broken out of the friend zone before. It's satisfying and validating of your skills. Probably worth it. Doesn't mean I wasn't having fun with other women at the same time. That doesn't mean I suggest it either... my only point was just that I disagree with 'the chances are nil', because that is false.
/r/seduction24/01/12 04:04 AM
1

So it doesn't mean handsome or pretty but it does mean how you smell? Both are just as genetic as each other, and it's abundantly clear that there's more to things than looks. Girls often claim to have 'types', which could simply mean what usually find is 'biocompatible' and wired to like. But clearly social cues can override that easily. I see no reason why it would be any different for pheromones, smells, or what have you than it is for looks. Take note that plenty of girls adore men they've n…
/r/seduction24/01/12 03:59 AM
1

And possibly more accurate.
/r/seduction22/01/12 04:12 PM
1

Female attraction is so blatantly more than just genetic. See: Any ugly celebrity with a hot girlfriend/wife.
/r/seduction22/01/12 12:43 PM
1

However, Treos85, you'll have to accept that once someone has decided so definitively that they aren't interested, that chances of you changing a person's mind is basically nil. I quite disagree. No interest is basically the friend zone problem, and I take it you don't believe that's impossible to get out of.
/r/seduction22/01/12 12:41 PM
1

It's cool, I genuinely wasn't really writing it as advice for you, just making sure people don't become dogmatic about it. Although re-reading this: but I wouldn't be so negative or overly preachy about it. I actually come off as a total ass, because I'm directing that at you, which I didn't mean to do. We are on the same page, brother! I do however, advise guys who don't have much experience to avoid doing it because it acts as a crutch and they will buy a girl a drink in the old fashioned AFC …
/r/seduction19/01/12 07:04 AM
1

Very true, but I wouldn't be so negative or overly preachy about it. You can get away with shit loads of things that are usually considered errors by having general tight game. Buying a drink can be used for locking people in and starting rounds, buying you time and in their head giving them a good reason for not leaving you to speak to their friends, etc. etc. (as I'm sure you know -- just for those reading who don't).
/r/seduction19/01/12 06:38 AM
2

Not suggesting you change your attitude to this girl or the situation, especially with a possible oneitis situation going on, but for the future, I've successfully managed an explicit friendzone situation (in a relationship existing from pre-game days) by pretty much not really acknowledging what happened and keeping it sexual. Specifically, I remain cheery, have a laugh, point out "No one's ever said that to me before!", and generally express a vibe that you're not actually taking any of this t…
/r/seduction15/01/12 06:22 AM
4

What I was coming to post. It's physical but not competitive and a free pass for 'accidental' touching up. Worked for me a ton of times too.
/r/seduction13/12/11 04:31 AM
1

Keep the glass vertical with your hand holding it from above, your fingers just under the rim.
/r/seduction13/12/11 12:55 AM
1

Not really -- when I've been on the receiving end of this, and everyone has at some point I'm sure, the 'people person' dude generally controls the frame with higher energy so that even if I dislike the person, I still feel lower in the social pecking order. Kind of like how bullies/jocks/whatever at school could be easily disliked but they'd still be popular. Also, generally people do like a good ego stroke that they'll overlook a lot of things that would have made them dislike a person if, for…
/r/seduction06/12/11 09:06 AM
3

It's no doubt quite easy to be dismissive to this, but I reckon it's probably slightly more credible a question than it first seems... A purple or orange room would probably produce a negative reaction in me if I walked into one. My personal choice would probably be a light (yellow, cream, wood-like) beige. Warm colours seem sensible, and that colour in my head isn't too garish or bright and definitely not dark -- right in the sweet spot. Also, bright colours make rooms look more spacious and fr…
/r/seduction29/11/11 01:26 PM
15

I'm sure we all know one or two people who are like this and it really can boggle the mind. I have the pleasure of being best friends with one of them, and good friends with several others (all from relatively separate social circles). Here's my view. Generally, I'd say those guys seem to very often benefit from inherent social structure. It's really quite simple and pretty much nothing to do with technique (once it's instilled that is -- attaining such a 'position' isn't random). Maybe they are…
/r/seduction29/11/11 06:40 AM
1

Guys guys guys guys guys guys guys guys guys guys guys guys guys guys guys guys guys -- This is Peacocking!
/r/seduction26/11/11 06:14 AM
2

killiusmaximus's post is sterling. But in answer to your question: My question is... does this chick wanna bang? Yes.
/r/seduction26/11/11 06:02 AM
3

I went through ten people (Who now will have nothing to do with me) because I assumed that they were attracted to me, only to be harshly reminded that they weren't. I've been slapped, stood up or just completely ignored. There's no way you were escalating right. You can start hitting on your long-term female friends and they won't run away forever unless you do something seriously off key. That said, when people say assume attraction, they usually mean with people who aren't already good friends…
/r/seduction26/11/11 05:16 AM
5

I work as a model these days (which also forced me to get my body in shape) and I think I fail the not-conventionally-attractive part, but I do actually have useful input. I had during my younger years at times, and very occasionally even recently, ridiculous acne. There is definitely a difference in how you're treated, but I also found that the further you are from physically attractive, the more weight your confidence and game is given. It seems almost like cheating. It's no surprise if people…
/r/seduction26/11/11 05:03 AM
1

Pizza is pretty good though.
/r/seduction26/11/11 04:52 AM
2

Depends on their age.
/r/seduction26/11/11 04:50 AM
1

i've never had anyone say anything about my texting. I don't go over a message or two, I never double send, I write correct punctuation. I'm guessing this is a person that likes longer texts. If you're genuinely not doing anything wrong, don't take it seriously at all. Effectively refuse to even acknowledge it. If your texting is incompatible and you want to change that, then gradually mirror her style more. I fucking hate how you text "Yeah, just like you hate black people. [...Back to convo...…
/r/seduction26/11/11 04:45 AM
1

Before I knew any of this stuff, I actually had a pretty bad date (movies... didn't talk, didn't make any move, wasn't much talking, bar afterward was shut) where my subsequent disappointment and lack of contact after 'confirmed' to her that I was uninterested in her, which actually spurred her on to chase me even more. In reality I just didn't want to make a fool of myself and further. Things worked out well. Also, dates like this are good. In fact it's important that a girl can sense you're, i…
/r/seduction17/11/11 03:35 AM
0

Pretty ridiculous post (Roosh's). Fuck a girl you like or find is hot. If you don't... don't fuck her. Why bother? Petty ego satisfaction? "Wooo, I'm getting laid". Big clap for you. Also, If his average is a 7 on a bell curve, he fucks as many 4s as he does 10s. Proof by contradiction: Can anyone believe Brad Pitt, George Clooney, Christian Bale, Jude Law, etc. etc. bang munters here and there as this guy would have you believe? No. They genuinely will have standards. His game is weak. Any siza…
/r/seduction16/11/11 08:38 PM
4

You can still convey nice guy vibes without actually fulfilling the stereotypical roles. I was never a nice guy, but I was often very polite to strangers and older people. Polite characteristics that damage you: Nodding more enthusiastically than necessary Smiling in an encouraging way too much. Paying a lot of attention with eye contact when someone's talking to you, especially when they're not looking at you. This is all good for making the person you're talking to feel good in the short term …
/r/seduction12/11/11 03:12 PM
1

I wouldn't necessarily agree. A lot of sarcasm has a lot of negative energy behind it-- often makes the user comes across as bitter and unhappy. Teasing can be very sarcastic, but the key component of teasing however you use it is that you're inviting the girl to qualify herself to you, which even if she doesn't comply with, makes you come across as the more dominant in the interaction.
/r/seduction12/11/11 02:16 PM
1

I think it's quite easy to botch the delivery on this though. haojifu (wtf) was pretty much spot on with his response and one fancy line isn't going to bring much more benefit than his did.
/r/seduction10/11/11 02:41 PM
1

http://blog.okcupid.com/index.php/your-race-affects-whether-people-write-you-back/ Bear in mind, despite the scary colours, it's a significant but relatively slight difference in percentages, not many times more difficult or anything. The reason is probably because you're living in a culture where non-whites are a minority. As such you can probably use it as peacocking as you're already more noticeable. Also, on a personal basis, I had an ex who lusted after black men, and I found it a little di…
/r/seduction10/11/11 09:39 AM
3

Consider it a challenge to help me, because I believe it's impossible. Just from what you wrote overall, I can tell you're in a lot better place than a lot of people. If you don't take yourself seriously nothing stays very scary and things tend to just become easy, your mistakes amusing. Laugh it all off and you become extremely self-reliant. No one really cares about your actions as much as you do anyway. Think anyone's going to be thinking about your awkward come on where you farted mid-speech…
/r/seduction10/11/11 09:01 AM
2

so I already know what the answers going to be. I like asking! Well if you already know it's in the bag, it truly no longer matters -- could probably ask if she wants to "play tongue tennis" and she'd go for it. However, if you're sailing close to the wind -- pushing things fast, breaking out of the friend zone, trying to get with someone you shouldn't (e.g. TA, room mate), etc. -- it starts to matter, and you want to avoid verbalizing it. I'd also say that engaging her logical brain by having h…
/r/seduction10/11/11 08:52 AM
2

Asking is really weak for about twenty different reasons. Even if she wants to kiss you, a lot of the time she's obliged to say 'no'. It's just a much more solid investment. You take away her 'it just happened' card. Also, 99% of the time asking comes across as 'can I kiss you?', and not at all from a position of power. If she's smiling and you can see "the look" in her eyes Then you don't need to ask! Talk with your body. When I kiss, it's a mutual escalation most of the time. Her holding eye c…
/r/seduction10/11/11 12:47 AM
1

This has actually happened to me before. People are claiming you're actually into her, don't realise etc. etc. It's not necessarily the case in my opinion. Upon reflection, I've came to the conclusion that now and again it's more that I'm unhappy that: Maybe she actually prefers that guy? Maybe she thinks he's better/sexier/funnier than me? It's not fair that he and she seem to be happier than me. I can't consider her Plan F anymore. It doesn't mean you're into them. You've just lost some fuel f…
/r/seduction09/11/11 03:58 PM
3

Reading the thread on mansformation, someone linked to a youtube video of a guy reviewing the drug (while driving his car) and he casually slipped in at the end that he wrote a 50,000 word novel in a month for a competition. That in itself isn't entirely impressive -- I did my disseration of a similar length in two weeks -- but the focus and drive it displays in that he done it voluntarily seems almost unthinkable to me. That's the sort of stuff that boosts your career.
/r/seduction06/11/11 08:44 AM
2

Never been in this position and it does seem rather frustrating, so this is a shot in the dark but: At times, girls will make it extremely obvious that they're interested, but as a DJ, I really can't engage in lengthy conversation. I think one of the only avenues open to you is to perhaps escalate kino quite a bit faster and more intensely to a) assure them you're actually interested and not just gliding along b) Have more of a memorable impact on their night -- the more "The DJ who felt me up/k…
/r/seduction22/10/11 03:25 AM
1

Without being too scathing -- this is seriously nonsense. Possibly a troll post. I'm hardly a 'master' by any means, but I could obliterate that four a week figure, without even getting anywhere near that number of approaches. If you're scooping four out of seventy, you're as well not bothering to learn game, you're already just running a numbers game. You think successful guys who haven't studied game make that many approaches? Nonsense. The human race would die out if it was that difficult for…
/r/seduction18/10/11 05:56 PM
1

If it worked well 8 years ago, and it did, it works now. You won't be losing out. Personally, reading magic Bullets didn't impart anything I didn't already gain from the above. It felt like a repackagaing if I remember. Don't take forum jockeys too seriously. Nothing is really 'outdated' as such. Slighting previous products is a way of increasing interest in their own, new product. That doesn't necessarily mean it isn't better either, but it's disingenious to claim stuff is outdated. Especially …
/r/seduction18/10/11 05:30 PM
1

3: You feel like an awkward douche because "spitting game" to random chicks isn't normal. I actually feel like an awkward douche watching guys trying to pick up girls with stupid ass lines/dumb jokes, etc. What does spitting game actually mean to you? The most popular schools of game are just instilling habits observed in successful interactions into people who haven't been employing them thus far. If girls knew guys were 'running game' it wouldn't be as effective. 4: Don't spend your time focus…
/r/seduction18/10/11 05:22 PM
1

It ended up being just girl party with me, so I naturally ended up leaving feeling out of place. There's really not enough context to say anything with too much certainty here, but I get the impression that leaving was a bad move. If you could win over her friends, you'd smooth your path with her in the long run considerably. If it looks to them like you ran away or were awkward or weird or anything like that, you've fucked up quite badly. If you exited gracefully, or didn't seem bothered by the…
/r/seduction18/10/11 04:08 AM
3

The up and downvotes are there to provide an indication as to how good the advice is, so if that's also what flair is used for, doesn't that make it quite redundant? Additionally, I feel it possible that those contributors would garner more upvotes for their posts than they would otherwise for a multitude of reasons. For example, people are more likely to be 'appreciative' of them responding if they have an air of authority. Obviously that may mean their posts aren't necessarily being upvoted on…
/r/seduction17/10/11 06:41 PM
3

Convey emotion through everything you say and do. Doesn't have to be intense all the time or anything, but you should always be feeling something yourself, and she'll naturally pick it up -- if you're rambling in your story, you're probably not doing it right. Everything is boring if it doesn't evoke an emotion in the other person. Use analogies Exaggerate and contrast during your analogies/metaphors. Relate it to a common experience ("Remember that?" - response (investment bonus!) - "Well imagi…
/r/seduction14/10/11 02:16 AM
1

Works great. It might not necessarily kill their interest enough, but it won't sting them much if they think you're clueless/shy/weird with women.
/r/seduction13/10/11 06:44 PM
1

There'd be less variability (not that it's all over the place) if there were more pictures in my opinion. Sometimes I've found guys are pretty poor at seeing the good (and the bad parts) in a single photograph. I've shown pictures of absolute babes, and they just don't see it until they see them in real life. It bamboozles me.
/r/seduction13/10/11 06:42 PM
1

I agree. However, I'd say that more often than not, fast talking is a symptom of a lack of comfort in a conversation. I know that's the case when I feel such an ugre. Whenever I expereince it, or want to talk fast, I feel that I'm being impatient, and wanting the other person to listen to you, which obviously conveys to them they are more socially significant. That said, the same can be said for talking loudly, but as far as I can tell, that actually works whereas talking quickly doesn't, presum…
/r/seduction13/10/11 02:05 PM
4

If it's just 'breaking the ice', forget your pen. "Hi, my name is X and I think you are gorgeous. I'd like to take you out some time."? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WWaLxFIVX1s
/r/seduction12/10/11 07:18 AM
1

Spot on. And I'm stealing the roller coaster line. I talk about midgets too! Incidentally, as far as I know, it's 4'10". I go with inclusive. Useful for telling them how close they are to being an official midget, demonstrated with fingers. Doesn't work with girls that actually ARE 4'10" and under though...
/r/seduction12/10/11 07:11 AM
1

I like this. Has good connotations.
/r/seduction12/10/11 07:09 AM
1

Possibly a troll acount, but meh: I quite like mentioning anything which highlights physical dominance like this, so her saying this is pretty much helping me. Mock-intrigue (wow!) and amusement (smirking) at her shortness are all good. Can get a bit of kino and intimacy by physically comparing yourself closely. Usually your conclusion can be something stupid to show just how great a distance there is ("You can fit a football/a whole head/a small dinosaur* between us!). Just have fun with it. It…
/r/seduction12/10/11 07:07 AM
1

I'm absolutely of the same opinion. It's no more useful than 'be yourself'. At its essence it is true, but it's pretty much just the sort of advice you'd get from 'natural' friends, which, when you try to implement it without all the underlying stuff, just isn't very useful. It seems easy once you're used to it, and that's because it is -- it's just like riding a bike. But kids learn to ride bikes faster with guidance than without...
/r/seduction12/10/11 02:26 AM
2

If this is the post I'm thinking of, did you not say it ruined your day? But yeah, I agree with your sort of resentment in a way. There is much more to your personal journey than other people will acknowledge, just because it's so subjective. One of my favourite days was just chilling with a girl and hugging. Might have been awful game but I still look back fondly. The reason people speak like that is pretty much because it's one of few objective measures of 'success' with women available, and o…
/r/seduction12/10/11 02:23 AM
1

Thing is you knew the material by time you went out on your own. This is a distinct advantage in using your experience to breakdown the problems and the victories. Sometimes experience does nothing without good information to comprehend what just happened. Certainly experience is the only way, but I haven't read anything real in these discussions that didn't stress that over everything else. Exactly this.
/r/seduction10/10/11 09:48 PM
1

I think an unsung advantage of reading is that it also allows you to understand in retrospect where you went wrong, whereas without you can be pretty lost and more likely to misattribute the reasons you've flopped, and also more likely to get demotivated. This means you'll improve far, far faster. Almost like replaying an old game.
/r/seduction10/10/11 09:47 PM
3

Might sound preachy, but seriously, proper unreactiveness/selective reactiveness/frame control/whatever you want to call it, will change your life, and it pretty much applies to all aspects of it, not just women. It blew my mind that I could make guys I'd pretty much accepted as cooler than me for years come off second socially without me even really doing anything. It's frowned upon to refer to movie characters, given that it's all scripted out for the hero, but James Bond is nigh on indomitabl…
/r/seduction09/10/11 02:50 AM
1

Overeager girls aren't as unattractive to guys in comparison to the other way round. However, I'd probably not text back as I reckon it would help in this instance. I'm guessing you don't know him very well. If you think he thinks he has you in the bag, not texting will unsettle him as it challenges that view. Won't mean he'll respond any better, that's certainly not the case with me, but it does admittedly take some of the power away if the other person you expect to carry your conversation, do…
/r/seduction09/10/11 01:39 AM
4

If you can call, call. In my head, I used to think phoning wasn't so cool because it would 'put them on the spot'. It probably does, but bear in mind how much easier it is to be attractive through your voice than just words, so that they'll also actually want to agree provided you don't make a hash of it. I think Txting is probably the surest bet(but possibly too safe) Afraid not... if she's unsure she want to go on it, with more time to think they have much more freedom to both convince themsel…
/r/seduction09/10/11 12:33 AM
1

I'm not familiar with basketball: Are players usually friends with other teams' players?
/r/seduction07/10/11 11:11 AM
1

I used to get similar pangs of self-hatred for missed opportunities. They go away, but unfortunately for me, eventually by entirely replacing them with fuck ups of a different order of magnitude. I once had a model ready to fuck, but I wanted to change rooms on the off chance some friends came back five hours early. Ended up getting locked out of both rooms. I wanted to cry. I look back on similar 'never spoke to her argh!' encounters and I'm not sure if I'd ever get as far to make such fuck ups…
/r/seduction06/10/11 08:55 AM
18

If you're getting them out on dates and have a 1 to 10 ratio, you're surely doing something wrong. In my opinion, plenty of preselection, teasing, physical escalation, and a solid frame that ejaculates straight through their shit tests is like a kettle for those lukewarm girls. Basically... game. To settle only for the easy girls I would suggest isn't the best route, for several reasons really. Firstly, obviously the hotter or more desirable the girl, the less likely she is to fall into the supe…
/r/seduction01/10/11 07:47 AM
2

Download the movie and "watch" it on your computer? It sort of depends on the context as well. If it's at the end of the night, you could invite her to try your best in the world [delicious food you made/bought/found // crazy cocktail you've perfected // art work//telescope]. Lots of room for creativity here. Obviously bear in mind that the the less it is of a last minute thing, the more something that lasts longer is preferable, like a movie.
/r/seduction29/09/11 06:49 AM
1

I went through all of this and found it super interesting. Cheers for the link. Last October, I watched him give a lecture to Seligman’s graduate students on the power of positive emotions—awe, love, compassion, gratitude, forgiveness, joy, hope, and trust (or faith). “The happiness books say, ‘Try happiness. You’ll like it a lot more than misery’—which is perfectly true,” he told them. But why, he asked, do people tell psychologists they’d cross the street to avoid someone who had given them a …
/r/seduction13/09/11 07:43 AM
2

If this is a physical thing, i.e. if you looked like Adonis, you'd be fine, then perhaps work out? If you feel hard work played a role in attaining something (so.... hard work -> better looks -> helps attract babe) you will feel more entitled to it. Other than that, I honestly don't really know how to help you, but what do you value in other people? Truly value? ... Deep down, kind and good-natured people are what I value. Other ideas? I also like it when people have determination and a never-sa…
/r/seduction13/09/11 06:33 AM
2

I was 6'2" and in 130s for a while at about 19, possibly in the 120s at some points, and I was fine with it because I had rather suddenly became tubby for a short while during my early teens and got ribbed for it from my mates. As such, I liked being skinnier than them, so in a bizarre way, they made me own and desire it. (For the record, pretty sure the skinniness to tubbiness to skinniness was completely hormonal, I didn't get a disorder from relatively light nastiness!). Unfortunately, it was…
/r/seduction13/09/11 06:22 AM
2

You pretty much have to be pretty dominant in the interaction for this to work, which helps stop that that sort of questioning feeling in her from coming up in the first place. Importantly, when she stops you, I'd say you have to make sure it doesn't happen abruptly with everything ending. She has to still feel on your side, and you're both in on it and just hampered by circumstance. Just slip back a gear into whatever you were before, and laugh it off, distract her with more regular kissing, et…
/r/seduction09/09/11 02:35 PM
1

Not a direct answer to your question, and totally unrelated to your yearbook troubles, but you can have a self-amused and ridiculously unreactive 'smile' that isn't really a smile at all, by just slightly raising your eyebrows and making sure you have the tiniest of smirks. Practise in the mirror. Think James Bond. I've found it to be an excellent demeanor which comes naturally to me.
/r/seduction09/09/11 02:22 PM
1

This, posted from the same thread, is damn impressive. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tsPc9vbDR7U&feature=player_embedded
/r/seduction03/09/11 09:48 AM
1

It's supplementary. Getting them to bed and persuading them to send pictures don't seem to be that strongly matched in terms of cooperation... I can give you jizz eyebrows and you won't give me a damn nude photo? What the hell, girl! Also: Also, I think it's important to remember that these pictures last forever. It's sad, but over time I forget the individuality of girls' bodies to the mists of time and memory, and it's frustrating, because I'm aware of it slipping. This doesn't happen here.
/r/seduction18/08/11 11:24 AM
1

TONS of effort for really not a lot of payout. It's not like those hours of build up necessarily have to be in one chunk. In fact, you don't have to be wearing clothes, or maintain control of your bowels, or in fact do anything other than string words together. I rate this rather low, in terms of effort. I mean, if I'm not out, I'd probably just be wasting that time on reddit otherwise, right? No biggie. Also, I think it's important to remember that these pictures last forever. It's sad, but ove…
/r/seduction18/08/11 11:20 AM
1

I believe this. My friend has girls write his name on their mammaries.
/r/seduction18/08/11 11:17 AM
1

Antiperspirant perhaps?
/r/seduction11/08/11 12:27 AM
2

Well this has become confusing.
/r/seduction28/07/11 08:40 PM
1

This is utterly spot on.
/r/seduction27/07/11 05:15 PM
1

I agree. Unless you can immediately establish that you could make him your bitch, for the lack of a better term, and unless you think him being friends with you will guilt trip him about anything he's thinking of, becoming friends with him doesn't seem like a good idea. Put it like this: When you're joining a new group, even if it's just two people, you want to make friends with the girl's male friends because there's a ton of benefits such as displaying social intelligence, social proof, and re…
/r/seduction27/07/11 05:14 PM
1

I have to ask: why? I mean, do you find having more friends on facebook a negative thing in some way? I have 500+ and I never tried. It just happened. Do I 'know' them? Well certainly, but the majority I've collected are just acquaintances from jobs, schools, holidays, bands, folk I see regularly at bars. etc. etc. I feel having a lot of friends shows you're social and don't take facebook too seriously.
/r/seduction27/07/11 05:00 PM
1

I'm utterly bamboozled and impressed.
/r/seduction22/07/11 12:50 AM
1

Right on! That's exactly how it would have went down with me, with the guy friend part. Almost as if you're going to give it, then........ no.
/r/seduction22/07/11 12:45 AM
2

I have nothing to directly add here, and I believe your question has been answered. But I've always found it troubling that the only time I've been oneitis-y was with a girl who actually wooed me, something I never really believed possibly, from which then followed a glorious honeymoon period. Eventually I screwed things up (I happily admit it) and she lost interest in me, leading to the most bizarre LJBF I've ever heard, which left me pretty heart-broken and I remained uninterested in anyone el…
/r/seduction20/07/11 09:30 AM
2

Good luck!
/r/seduction05/07/11 06:31 AM
1

Fuck that shit, steamroller through. When you think of strong, respectable men, I'm betting you imagine them impervious the worries and sensitivities of lesser beings. They'd stroll right up. Exert some more control over their destiny.
/r/seduction04/07/11 09:02 PM
1

This is high risk and moderate reward. Keep the rapier wit for later when you're in a position to recover from any brick-swims in my opinion.
/r/seduction01/07/11 07:21 PM
2

Spot on with the head-leaning thing! I agree so much I'd actually meant to write it and forgot about it by the time I'd got to my last point. Good way for this situation to happen is if you're both drunk/saying goodbye/randomly re-meeting each other again (and not applicable behaviour for OP)/dancing dodgily -- is initiating a hug. Don't let go. Lay head on torso. Let it go chill. Eventually the hug becomes holding onto each other, and at this point, from my perspective, the girl usually looks u…
/r/seduction01/07/11 09:02 AM
3

If it's clearly 'on' between you, i.e. touchy, laughing, people think you're together.... Get comfortable. Get physically close. Stop talking. Hold eye contact. Hoooold. Start (possibly mutual) smooth head-path collision. Kiss. Generally, as I read in someone's book and can't remember which: silence and eye contact = sexual tension. It's money. I'm sure deep down I knew it, but having it spelt out made lots of sense to me and the presence/absence has been a common factor in my successes/failures…
/r/seduction01/07/11 06:39 AM
9

.... that's an amazing idea.
/r/seduction01/07/11 03:46 AM
79

Looks behind for someone else
/r/seduction01/07/11 01:53 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter