TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

CurtisAxelmania Archive

View 9 posts and 794 comments by CurtisAxelmania on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

Much as I like most of what John Hawkins wrote, he is sexist too: , if you’re a guy and you pass out at a frat party, you might wake up to find someone drawing on your face with a magic marker. If you’re a woman in the same situation, you might wake up with a strange guy on top of you A guy could wake up with a strange woman on him. What is worse: if it was unprotected sex he can't take a morning after pill to avoid becoming a parent.
/r/MensRights04/06/17 03:55 AM
3

We should make "nigsplaining" and "jewsplaining" and "spicsplaining" and "muzsplaining". The point in using these is not actually to offend these groups but to engage in active mockery of the root usage and to make people sick of the -splaining suffix.
/r/MensRights04/06/17 03:45 AM
1

Stop mansplaining words to us. You need girlsamine the situation better.
/r/MensRights04/06/17 03:42 AM
6

Labianalyzing
/r/MensRights04/06/17 03:39 AM
32

Forget about jail time a second guys... She was only fired... Doesn't even say disbarred. That is the first more realistic step here.
/r/MensRights04/06/17 03:38 AM
1

Spread out.
/r/MensRights31/05/17 08:03 AM
0

Hate isn't all the same. Hate can be founded in opposition to intolerant and unfair beliefs. Opposition to religions or isms is different than racism/sexism.
/r/MensRights31/05/17 08:03 AM
1

If he doesn't stand by any of his old writings nothing is stopping him from publishing a retraction. Breitbart didn't say that. Please attribute an actual author and what they said you think is wrong.
/r/MensRights31/05/17 08:01 AM
1

Sexual assault is not inherently torture, since it can include violations of unconscious people. You must be conscious to be tortured. Rape does not become less horrendous if you do it to someone older. Perhaps you saying this is weighing it on the capacity to handle stress? That is more multifaceted than age. I think we have too little information regarding "all forms" to say trauma is extremely common in all. I expect more common the more severe. What makes me think Emily Doe consented is mult…
/r/MensRights31/05/17 08:00 AM
1

I don't believe in spirits. We narrow our hearts because of dismissals like these. Women who call men broken are the ones who need lessons.
/r/MensRights31/05/17 07:47 AM
1

It is better because MRA is a more worthy past time than Islam or most any religion. So those who hate the former are worse than those who hate the latter.
/r/MensRights30/05/17 03:10 AM
0

If someone said that I would figure I am not the portion of the room being addressed. If someone asked "would anyone injured like to have a lighter workout?" at a dojo I wouldn't take that to mean the instructor is saying everyine is injured.
/r/MensRights30/05/17 03:08 AM
1

Apostrophe rape This is true. External hard drives of 5 tB going for 200 these days and I can stored thousands of hours with hundreds of waifus on there.
/r/MensRights30/05/17 03:06 AM
1

Calling it regressive implies that paying people not to work is progress.
/r/MensRights30/05/17 03:05 AM
1

The physical sensation is adequate. Mentally you feelnthe milk is needed. Excessive inherent trust in a mother is a disadvantage. Build situational trust instead.
/r/MensRights30/05/17 03:04 AM
1

Khzir Muazzam Khan. Read his publications.
/r/MensRights30/05/17 03:02 AM
0

The 23 hours of the day when you aren't feeding/cleaning them.
/r/MensRights30/05/17 03:01 AM
1

They claimed he was fucking her, they pressed rape charges based in that then dropped them when the physical evidence didn't hold up. The alleged victim had no testimony. She claimed she was unconscious and didn't remember anything. She made an impact statement based in the story others put together.
/r/MensRights30/05/17 03:00 AM
1

Sex has pregnancy risks, other stuff can be upsetting it lacks that. Severity of physical damage should make up a big part of sentencing. My objection here is I believe Emily Doe enthusiastically consented to being fingered.
/r/MensRights30/05/17 02:59 AM
3

awesome that a big summer superhero movie is finally centred around a woman Supergirl was July 1984 Catwoman was July 2004 Wonder Woman already had an animated film of her own but even though they tend to be better, I guess we need a pop culture live action "big" film right? It is probable I am overlooking other examples.
/r/MensRights28/05/17 06:52 AM
2

In don't think you should be forced to serve people you don't want to serve.
/r/MensRights28/05/17 06:48 AM
1

I would shop wherev r had the best prices. The question is if lost black sales vs fewer black robberies would cause that.
/r/MensRights28/05/17 06:47 AM
2

I loved the show "Bomb Girls". Volunteers actually did some dangerous work making munitions. At the very least we should force women to do that since they are a liability on the front lines.
/r/MensRights28/05/17 06:42 AM
1

Is the a Wikipedia articlenabout this 21/30 law? Should be.
/r/MensRights28/05/17 06:39 AM
2

OP did not state that. Why do you think any addressal of men in a room is saying ther are no girls?
/r/MensRights28/05/17 06:37 AM
9

How is it selective if you are coerced into doing it?
/r/MensRights28/05/17 06:35 AM
0

What if you don't begin dating someone because of that? Are we obligated to stick with sick people? What if they turn into massive cunts? Or people sick because they are fat or smoke?
/r/MensRights28/05/17 06:33 AM
1

We do not universally dislike discrimination against religious people here.
/r/MensRights28/05/17 06:30 AM
3

To have a waifu to cudderu
/r/MensRights28/05/17 06:29 AM
1

I am incredibly shocked something like this was printed in 2001. Feels like we only began to wake up about this in 2011.
/r/MensRights28/05/17 06:23 AM
1

Yes, but they should stop first.
/r/MensRights28/05/17 06:17 AM
13

I pretty much agree with this. As long as all discrimination by businesses is allowed. Let the free market choose.
/r/MensRights28/05/17 06:11 AM
6

Yup. That guy with the soldier son who bashed trump for Hillary argued for sharia law.
/r/MensRights28/05/17 06:09 AM
0

How about instead of 18 months for a woman we split it to 9 months for both parents? Unpaid though. If you want a vacation save your money.
/r/MensRights28/05/17 05:33 AM
2

Women can pump their breast milk and store it. No excuses
/r/MensRights28/05/17 05:32 AM
0

Did you read about the promising swimmer Brock Turner last year, who raped an unconscious woman (and was caught in the act - no false accusation claims feasible FYI), This is a lie. There is no proof of Brock Turner raping anyone. It was a false accusation made by Swedish exchange students who beat him up for fun and then had to justify it to avoid assault charges.
/r/MensRights28/05/17 05:26 AM
2

Feminists probably call MRAs dicks.
/r/MensRights28/05/17 05:24 AM
1

Don't forget PMS
/r/MensRights28/05/17 05:24 AM
1

This is also how I figured the hamster rolls. Like "I fucked him because I thought he would spend the night cuddling but he didn't so I did not give consent to non-cuddling sex so it was rape." Of course men can't call rape in similar situations... Like if you give cunnilingus expecting or even being promised a blowjob in return and then don't get one, isn't that rape? You did not consent to one sided oral!
/r/MensRights28/05/17 05:24 AM
1

Is basically "I consented believing X then discovered Y so it was not informed consent"
/r/MensRights28/05/17 05:20 AM
1

We can legally choose to ignore anybody's consent with enough public approval. Rape is a philosophical idea, we don't have to limit our ideas of it to present day legal agreements.
/r/MensRights28/05/17 05:19 AM
1

What do you know now about sex that you didn't know at 15? Reversing the sexes causes no problems for me. Older party isn't necessarily using / manipulating.
/r/MensRights28/05/17 05:17 AM
-2

15-YEAR-OLD boy who met an American mother of three online told police that having sex with her made him ‘‘feel like a somebody" decision the boy later told police he was happy with.‘‘I was excited by this,’’ he said.‘‘She seemed like a nice person.‘‘I was also excited about the thought of having sex with Barbara.‘‘She made me feel happy. She made me feel like a somebody.’’ Sounds like enthusiastic uncoerced consent to me. I don't know anything more now about sexual dangers than I did at 15 so I…
/r/MensRights19/05/17 07:39 AM
1

I dont see any reason to call this rape. I wouldn't assume it was rape if an American man fucked a 15 yar old Aussie girl either. She was charged with "sexual penetration of a minor" which is interesting.
/r/MensRights19/05/17 07:36 AM
1

Sis appears to support her. But then, Stockholm?
/r/MensRights18/05/17 07:40 AM
1

I misremembered and thought there had been some prior indicator of vaginal mischief that led to the pebble discovery but it is described as being done out of curiosity about anatomical similarity so you are right.
/r/MensRights18/05/17 07:39 AM
1

Don't worry, some day you too can become a gentlecolt.
/r/MensRights18/05/17 07:32 AM
1

I rule 34 has a place here too.
/r/MensRights18/05/17 07:31 AM
1

It does since it still affects those remaining jobs. Particularly if they are increasingly in remaining non laborioua fields women gravitate to.
/r/MensRights18/05/17 07:31 AM
1

Been a while since I read the account. Can't recall how old she was. Parents probably tend to shrug this off the younger they are and the more X chromosomes they have.
/r/MensRights18/05/17 07:30 AM
3

He did her and all observers a service. No more coddling the "let them eat cake" princesses.
/r/MensRights14/05/17 02:34 AM
3

I don't care how old, she could be 8, if she makes a sexist / racist rant she is not off limits for criticism. Parents had the chance to correct them and missed it.
/r/MensRights14/05/17 02:33 AM
3

If only it were legal for women to make their own soccer organizations. Then women managers would finally treat the players fairly. What is stopping this?
/r/MensRights14/05/17 02:31 AM
3

If all the women watching Dr. Phil spent that hour watching women's soccer, the wage gap would probably vanish overnight.
/r/MensRights14/05/17 02:29 AM
2

I liked the Simpsons episode "Apocalypse Cow" which featured the 4H. I <3 WrestleMania.
/r/MensRights14/05/17 02:26 AM
1

How? First commercial with a same sex couple or something?
/r/MensRights14/05/17 02:25 AM
1

The whole point of an inflating age of consent and vilification of jailbait daters becomes clear: so they can be a basis of comparison for any man without an oedipal cougar complex so as to criticize them
/r/MensRights14/05/17 02:22 AM
23

You didn't know the deets behind the Dunham accusations til now? I think it was in her bio.
/r/MensRights14/05/17 02:20 AM
1

I hold your optimism, always imagining cu king authors with ulterior subtexts.
/r/MensRights14/05/17 02:19 AM
1

If there is no work, there is no work. This will just be a fact people have to learn to deal with. This is one of the rare occasions we cannot blame feminism Implying feminism can't exert a chilling effect on businesses or men acquiring educations?
/r/MensRights14/05/17 02:18 AM
2

Even Simpsons is doing this recently. This one ep this year when Burns manages a university was epic.
/r/MensRights14/05/17 02:15 AM
1

Maybe the BA in Women's Studies being disinterested in plumbers is a good reason to get into the trades.
/r/MensRights14/05/17 02:14 AM
2

I don't think MLP was the answer to the serious issues your country is facing It is 20% better than any other answer you can find. Friendship and kindness is an easy feat.
/r/MensRights14/05/17 02:13 AM
2

I wasn't keen on MLP You just aren't sophisticated enough to appreciate the plot.
/r/MensRights14/05/17 02:11 AM
12

Muh systematic oppression Which gender is more often genitally mutilated, pushed to suicide, jailed, attacked, limited to dangerous work, falsely accused and denied post-conceptive reproductive controls again?
/r/MensRights14/05/17 02:06 AM
1

Humor bra, we mock metaphors.
/r/MensRights14/05/17 02:04 AM
27

In all fairness, she only pried open her baby sister's outer labia because there were pebbles inside. Everyone should have that freedom. Do we want prepubescent girls running around with pebbles getting sucked into their cervixes and damaging their Fallopion tubes?
/r/MensRights14/05/17 02:03 AM
2

Especially if her customers were not particularly girthy. Kegels help with muscle tone but not other soft tissues.
/r/MensRights14/05/17 02:00 AM
1

"A group of men" is not demonizing the entire gender. I accuse groups of women of all kinds of bad stuff. Feminists fall that demonizing all women, and you are behaving like that.
/r/MensRights14/05/17 01:57 AM
1

Sure there is, if they are still charging you for time you spend sleeping.
/r/MensRights14/05/17 01:54 AM
1

I am skeptical she can actually keep track of 10,000 men. What if it was 10,000 sessions and some were repeats? I mean what does she do, have a giant book of names? 100 page notebook with 100 names each page?
/r/MensRights14/05/17 01:53 AM
1

Does this mean they finished the Calgary thing? I want to see them get back the money for trip 1 before doing trip 2.
/r/MensRights14/05/17 01:33 AM
0

I would also say there's nothing harmful in treating men like dogs. Principles can apply cross species. For example, I don't hit dogs, and try not to speak to them in anger. I am like this with men and women too.
/r/MensRights10/05/17 05:42 AM
1

Been watching this show in Bravo. I remember reading it in high school. Recent ep introduced the issue of female genital mutilation. Hopefully that starts some good conversations about male gm.
/r/MensRights09/05/17 05:20 AM
0

RoK doesn't advocate, it gives a platform to authors. Dogs are often treated better than people so there is nothing harmful there. You can take this approach to more than just women. Which author made borderline abusive comments?
/r/MensRights04/05/17 07:25 PM
1

Seems you are using exaggerations to avoid specifics.
/r/MensRights04/05/17 08:14 AM
1

Malcolm X seems like a reliable guy. He knew about Jakub.
/r/MensRights03/05/17 09:27 AM
1

I do not accept a "real man" template. All humans engage in risk taking. I do not agree with the premise that taking risks is manly. For example: an attention whore could overdose on pills, not wanting to die, but risking health problems, in the hopes that people will save her and pay more attention to her. I could run out into the middle of traffic for lulz. That is risk taking. A man or a woman could have unprotected sex with someone HIV positive. Huge risk taking. That is simply stupidity, no…
/r/MensRights03/05/17 09:25 AM
1

Will check in desktop later. $50 tablet shorter than my hand can't do view anymore.
/r/MensRights03/05/17 09:21 AM
1

What did the texts say?
/r/MensRights03/05/17 09:20 AM
1

I don't have a problem with the first two. Can't recall the dueling one. I think for myself so I an not threatened by listening to interesting ideas I may or may not agree with. RoK has a wide array of authors and some are more out there than others. I would respect criticism more if it were aimed at a specific author than an entire site.
/r/MensRights03/05/17 09:19 AM
1

While I agree with targeting the hospitals and medical literature, we shouldn't simply ignore the strong Jewish presence behind defending circumcision. They reframe any attack on it as antisemitic so we may as well be and destabilize them. Foreskin Man was a fabulous comic.
/r/MensRights03/05/17 09:16 AM
1

The "let's you" thing is situational. Wives/girlfriends would be different than stranger on a subway for example.
/r/MensRights03/05/17 09:13 AM
1

Think you meant admission not omission. http://www.returnofkings.com/119864/bill-oreillys-firing-shows-that-you-dont-need-any-evidence-whatsoever-to-destroy-a-man was an interesting writeup on this.
/r/MensRights03/05/17 09:11 AM
1

I use toon pics on Facebook. Problem?
/r/MensRights03/05/17 09:10 AM
1

Actually the mass chanting of "rape her" in these situations is fucking hilarious and only creepy to idiots who don't get the joke. We do this en masse to poke fun at the perceptions people have of men. It only gets creepy if someone begins to go into excessive detail as if they were roleplaying it out.
/r/MensRights03/05/17 09:09 AM
1

But others read this too...
/r/MensRights03/05/17 09:07 AM
1

MWO is correct here. Who the hell is up voting temper and down voting buddy?
/r/MensRights03/05/17 09:06 AM
1

Consent can be implicit through body language like pulling down your pants and throwing a guy a condom and doing a come hither finger crook. Of course a lot of body language consent for sex could be perceived as criminal in itself as indecent exposure.
/r/MensRights03/05/17 09:05 AM
3

Where does TRP as a.whole advocate it? As opposed.to individual posters. I guess thought could be 1) don't get married, but if you do, try to keep it intact intact by doing X 2) be so perfect at game that you never I've to worry about divorce laws.and if the relationship fails it is your fault for not applying game properly, not because game has holes.
/r/MensRights02/05/17 11:15 AM
2

Apparently men are the problem because we will throw eggs at him to toughen him up for being such a wuss for being raped by an adult. The rapist isnt the problem she was just symbolically raping the patriarchy by raping a prepubescent boy.
/r/MensRights02/05/17 11:13 AM
2

One could argue that for male rapists too. They might not like that.
/r/MensRights02/05/17 11:11 AM
4

But they have a.penis so she is striking back against the patriarchy.
/r/MensRights02/05/17 11:10 AM
1

WCG your title is.accurate..MRAs is only used once: men’s rights activists, colloquially known as “MRAs,” It doesn't say all posters are MRAs as you claim. It is also misleading.as.if to say it is THE sub, when it is really just saying "the sub" and associating "men's rights" with it.
/r/MensRights02/05/17 11:02 AM
1

AVFM Video Source is laggy and won't load for me. Is https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZaQOKmIgm4M the same thing? Any cliffs or text for those of us with vid trouble?
/r/MensRights02/05/17 10:57 AM
3

PUA doesn't necessarily mean sex obsessed. Some stuff I read on ROK is about bad cues to drop a girl. What is more obsessed: nexting a bad prospect or hanging in there puttingyourself at risk and wasting time for potenttial sex?
/r/MensRights02/05/17 10:53 AM
3

Who is 'they'? Some posters doing that isnt TRP as a a whole doing so.
/r/MensRights02/05/17 10:51 AM
3

Subreddits using a term should not define its uses.
/r/MensRights02/05/17 10:51 AM
8

all women are sadists Please link to a post on that sub making such a claim Clearly most of these guys have never even talked to a woman because they think women are these easily manipulated idiots. If they had, they'd be in jail for sexual harassment. They're a bunch of losers trying to make themselves feel better. A cult of pseudo-hyper manliness. Some pickup lines are more realistic than others. Some posters suggesting outlandish passes isn't grounds to making sweeping generalizations about t…
/r/MensRights02/05/17 10:47 AM
3

Do any modern gay magazines publish stuff like this? I can appreciate it..didn't know about the sewing your dick to your scrotum tactic
/r/MensRights02/05/17 10:43 AM
1

Legal threat mostly due to the trouble of trial. How many people actually pleas innocent and fight this? I don't believe a grandfather clause exists on child porn laws. Pretty sure even if a photo or film was shot in the 60s you could still go to jail for it. Artistic intent as VK is example of could be declared for every comic/toon (manta/anime)
/r/MensRights02/05/17 10:07 AM
1

That is just her testimony. Where is testimony from him affirming this?
/r/MensRights02/05/17 10:05 AM
17

News 5 neglects to mention the real world practice the mural is portraying, but this article does http://forward.com/news/breaking-news/199628/circumcision-gas-station-mural-sparks-protests-in/
/r/MensRights02/05/17 10:04 AM
1

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virgin_Killer#Wikipedia_controversy It has been over 8 years since this was reported to the FBI. The article with the cover art remains up. Wikipedia has not been v&. Of course it could be another matter if someone painted this on the side of their house.
/r/MensRights30/04/17 05:50 AM
1

Quote plz. I see no first hand admission. Only claims by others.
/r/MensRights30/04/17 05:46 AM
1

Softcore porn is sex where you don't see the genitals but sex is still happening in softcore. Sex wasn't shown in Bund/Monogatari Merely having erotic components doesn't make something softcore porn. There are erotic components in Agents of Shield, for example, like Skye waking up in the bathtub, but it isn't porn. Even shows which do show some sex aren't necessarily porn. Shows like "The Catch" have plenty of sex scenes but the show isn't pornography, those are part of the storytelling.
/r/MensRights30/04/17 04:21 AM
1

The quote doesn't appear better than a jacket, I would like to address the original claim. What is name of 4000 year old loli vamp? Did you mean 400? Mina Tepes is apparently over 400 and Shinobu Oshino over 500 if we can trust their wikia pages. I know from watching the Monogatari series and Dance in the Vampire Bund that in both cases the loli is just a disguise though. Both have fully grown adult forms. The most erotic I recall either being depicted is Shinobu appearing in Koyomi's bath to co…
/r/MensRights30/04/17 03:56 AM
3

23 would be better still. It is a prime age.
/r/MensRights30/04/17 03:44 AM
13

Where will the mohels get stem cells to taste if you interfere with mezizah b'peh of infants? They can't get it from sucking adult converts! This makes me wonder... Has oral suction circumcision even been done on an adult? It seems like mohels reserve this exclusively for prepubescent infants. Curious.
/r/MensRights30/04/17 03:44 AM
5

I will say the oldest of whatever age needed for drinking / smoking / marriage / army service / driving / voting. But I would much raethsr the requirement be education than age. Many adults.remain ignorant of what circumcision does. Only those who understand what they are losing should be allowed to do it. They require that type of stuff to get gender reassignment for example. I would hold circumcision to equal standards as getting a sex change for the type of counseling and waiting periods that…
/r/MensRights30/04/17 03:41 AM
1

It will always be grey because doing it based in age is physical discrimination like excluding based in gender or race or mobility. We should measure mental maturity directly and give licenses to those who pass. Any sex without both having licenses is illegal. Neither will be punished unless it can be proven they consented, in which case they must be punished for consenting to an illegal act.
/r/MensRights30/04/17 03:36 AM
1

Do you have a picture of the rear manga jacket? If so maybe I should question if the wiki was right about Rei being 17 or not. A source wasn't listed.
/r/MensRights30/04/17 03:32 AM
1

1) Who asks you to believe the high school teens are only 18 or 19? Was.it ever advertised that way? 2) are the girls actually random teens, or could they all be upperclassmen? The easiest solution is to provide one girl under 18 per canon. Heck, here I will solve 2 for you. http://highschool-of-the-dead.wikia.com/wiki/Rei_Miyamoto says she is 17. Assuming that is right... 1) give an example of a picture of her you consider pornographic from the official manta or anime 2) show where she is offic…
/r/MensRights30/04/17 03:26 AM
1

A mugging is worse. Severity of sentences do not necessarily dictate the severity of a crime.
/r/MensRights30/04/17 03:24 AM
1

It is possibly to.not be traumatized by any crime. Probabilities vary though. Being aware a crime happened being one factor. Like if someone steals your trophy but you didn't notice it was gone, or someone tongued your ass during your sleep but you never knew, it isn't traumatic.
/r/MensRights30/04/17 03:23 AM
1

I call it abuse because it IS, in fact, an age of consent violation, and so that automatically means someone (or both) are being sexually abused/molested/raped I don't agree with the idea that legal classification should trump logical philosophy in our parlance. Corporations having legal personhood wouldn't necessitate we converse about them as.actual people for example.
/r/MensRights30/04/17 03:21 AM
1

I would be fine with this, so long as she drops the course or has to retake it with a different teacher. This should be done prior to fucking. If both parties do not mutually disclose it ahead of time, I would consider it a conflict of interest and kick both out if school.
/r/MensRights30/04/17 03:19 AM
2

Can you show me evidence he bragged?
/r/MensRights30/04/17 03:17 AM
1

Although some testified the boy bragged about it, I haven't yet seen a statement saying the boy admitted to bragging about I in court.
/r/MensRights30/04/17 03:16 AM
4

She also described the teen as having a “braggadocious nature” and a “propensity to lie.” I imagine a male judge speaking of a teen girl who had a threesome with two male teachers in this manner would not be villified in the media with mass petitons asking for his resignation.
/r/MensRights30/04/17 03:14 AM
1

To move on, if you have retracted this as an example of complaint, what example does fit the complaints?
/r/MensRights30/04/17 03:08 AM
1

I will modify that statement to "most women see most men justnas resources" , I realize that could be taken to mean "all", which is wrong. I imagine most women do have at least one man for whom they see value in for reasons in addition to being a personal resource.
/r/MensRights30/04/17 03:02 AM
6

Gamergate spawned http://deepfreeze.it which documented the bad jornos. A good model for other media.
/r/MensRights27/04/17 09:29 AM
3

Carl Jenkins will save her.
/r/MensRights27/04/17 09:25 AM
1

I like everything about this except for referring to Samantha Geimer as a rape victim. I believe she consented to everything they did. The real victim is Jack Nicholson. She stripped and dripped into his jacuzzi without Jack's consent.
/r/MensRights27/04/17 09:18 AM
2

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_feather the activity of the Pankhursts and their ilk is pretty accepted, are you disputing it? It is an unfair cause if they seek male rights like voting without pursuing male burdens like the involuntary draft. Without romance catalysis you wouldn't have a lot of risky behavior. A lot of materialism is for women, and men may commit crime or overwork to achieve it. I won't use subhuman, but I do think they are less often as self sacrificing. As they don't seem…
/r/MensRights27/04/17 08:09 AM
1

I would let them keep "don't hit a woman" if they were to enforce an equal "don't hit a kan" policy. For example: every woman who would dump a lady-hitting man, would they with equal fervor dump a man-hitting man, or would a sizable amount cream their panties and date the jealous bad boy, all the while engaging in the collective persecution of men who simply defend themselves against violent women?
/r/MensRights27/04/17 08:01 AM
1

The majority of silent supporters shelter the radicals.
/r/MensRights27/04/17 07:57 AM
1

He never hurt a thing, but he did hurt the thing.
/r/MensRights27/04/17 07:56 AM
1

People confess as part of plea bargains to avoid higher charges all the time. If it were a man I wouldn't necessarily believe that.
/r/MensRights27/04/17 07:53 AM
1

Assuming good faith is becoming progressively difficult here. You are too clever to miss the grammatical arrangement. This could progress to new ground if you simply admit the structure was making statements about HSOTD.
/r/MensRights27/04/17 07:52 AM
1

Distribution to whom? Unless it is done with the aim of harming the victim or it kicks back funds to the creator-rapist I still don't discern MensRea there, could reduce income for seller.
/r/MensRights27/04/17 07:50 AM
1

For the most part men care as little for mens rights as your average woman does, perhaps even less. Their more likely to be drawn towards womans rights or feminism because their drive to protect woman are stronger than their drive to defend other men. It would be great if more woman did care but villainizing them for not doing so is missing the plot. It would be less of a sting if there were not so many women voicing how loving and equal they are. My dogs don't care and it doesn't bother me, but…
/r/MensRights27/04/17 07:47 AM
1

You mean subreddit? I wouldn't say the whole thing, or very oportunity. You approach truth in that complaints are common and that doing it too much can be unbalanced. I have to wonder why some complaints get labeled cringey whining while others do not. I know women's complaints may be described that way sometimes too, but I do not see that as often. They seem like termed aimed at inflaming the male ego as a threat to our refuge if stoic dispassion.
/r/MensRights27/04/17 07:39 AM
1

I didn't say most were conciously malevolent or nefarious. Most seem willing to tolerate that though.
/r/MensRights25/04/17 10:52 AM
2

If their heart is in it, why are they initiating most divorces, spending most of the money, and avoiding their potential utility as advocates? Women inherently avoid so many minefields in things like intactivism yet this is still a thing. If they so outnumber the haters then why is it we only witness a minority like the Honey Badgers getting bullied out of conventions by 100x as many women while 1000x that turn a blind eye and let it happen when they could easily remedy things?
/r/MensRights25/04/17 10:35 AM
2

I don't. I think they want handicaps. At best they might want equal outcomes but not equal rights. They want extra rights so they can lift half the weight and get paid the same.
/r/MensRights25/04/17 10:17 AM
1

I don't celebrate malaria or promote its spread or benefit from its existence..doesn't seem like an ideal comparison. This is not my perspective in humanity. It is a perspective on a group of individuals. You can gain an understanding if the world if the shitty perspective is truth. Abandoning a possibility because it unsettles you isn't honest thinking. These are not exceptions. There is no basis for these assumptions of positive generalizing. Love is rare. More common at best is interchangeabl…
/r/MensRights25/04/17 10:14 AM
1

Regardless of who does it, women aren't taking a stand against it like men would if women started attacking each other a lot. Women also manipulate men as proxy violence more often than men pressure women to fight each other. Your "broad cultural views" argument is a hair away from "the patriarchy" and "feminism will fix this". Women embrace a fragile/helpless image. They emphasize it to avoid work and trigger the protective instincts of men. They do want strong ken to protect them. Their heroin…
/r/MensRights25/04/17 09:56 AM
1

I do not agree with implying sex with a 14 year old is pedophilia. That is years after puberty began. Far more normal.
/r/MensRights25/04/17 09:03 AM
1

In fairness, not viewing for gratification does sound like a decent defense, something that could be assumed by default for all people unless there was evidence to the contrary like making posts on the darkwsb praising the video. Of course the problem with that is it would just be used to reduce women sentences, they would always try to make it seem like men enjoyed everything they saw.
/r/MensRights25/04/17 09:02 AM
0

Is it possible they didn't have enough evidence?
/r/MensRights25/04/17 08:59 AM
5

No. That isn't a good definition. Feminism is best defined as a focus on the defense and advancement of female privileges.
/r/MensRights25/04/17 08:58 AM
1

Reread your post https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/66kgi7/are_men_shamed_for_repeatedly_asking_consent/dgmehtx/?utm_content=permalink&utm_medium=front&utm_source=reddit&utm_name=MensRights You clearly said HSOTD had prepubescent chests, clits, hairless crotchss and age mods from 17- to 18+ If you meant only other stuff had this then HSotD should not have been included as an example. If you assent to withdraw this then what anime series are you referring to?
/r/MensRights25/04/17 08:54 AM
1

Can we get a name here? Something tells me whatever immolation dad we are talking about probably lost a series of court cases and probably had his life Falk apart a lot of other ways. Can we get a name for the mom and evidence if how fit she is?
/r/MensRights25/04/17 08:50 AM
1

Guardians of the Galaxy vol 2 fgt
/r/MensRights25/04/17 08:48 AM
1

Why is it too far? Should I be compelled to assume they care for us when every glance at the world screams no? The ones who seriously care for any large number are a minority.
/r/MensRights25/04/17 08:48 AM
1

I take back vocabulary. Gay and Faggot have pre-homosexualerotic usage. To mock excessively burdensome or happy behaviors does not denigrate men attracted to men. Not sure what you mean by liberals or traditionalist conservatives. Latter the "cuckservative" word? Denigrating panderers is fine to me. I am fine with anyone using nigger. Context matters more than what a word is. Substituting " n word" is exactly the kind of move that would fit the stereotype. So petrified of black violence you tipt…
/r/MensRights25/04/17 08:46 AM
1

There may or may not be. I would say fewer men think that way. That is why women are assaulted and murdered less than men. Why their safety is prioritized in evacuations. Why we more often fight for their honor or safety than they for ours. You are quick to try and make this personal. Observing the world is enough to form these conclusions.
/r/MensRights25/04/17 08:37 AM
3

Men have always been the primary victims of rape. Men lose their wives, their mothers, their daughters in rapes.
/r/MensRights25/04/17 08:34 AM
1

Re your first line, since I have yet to get I to the series, I am.asking this from you: 1) evidence HSOTD is being marketed "all characters 18+" somewhere 2) evidence that prior to this a character was stated in original anime or manga to be 17 or younger This still wouldn't warrant accusing the show of flaunting prepubescent chests. Even if the HSotD cast was 14-17 that is not a prepubescent age range. I would also like evidence: 1) that a clitoris was shown in the HSotD anime or manga 2) that …
/r/MensRights24/04/17 06:59 AM
2

I feel you, I am about a year behind. Apparently the Undertaker retired. League of Nations was a couple years ago I think back when I was still enjoying. Now it is all about ROH and Dalton Castle.
/r/MensRights24/04/17 06:49 AM
19

A guy driven to do that by dehumanization isn't necessarily like that when he is initially evaluated. Your argument sounds like if I torture a guy so he has crying fits and wets himself at the slightest noise, that behavior means he should never have been a father. To me it just means he should never have been mistreated.
/r/MensRights24/04/17 06:45 AM
5

I don't like the excessive concern on how our bantr gives us rep. Same kinda reasoning would say we can't playfully call each other faggots. I don't want that taken away. Speak your mind. Tell me to "do it faggot" or "can it cuck" if you like. One cool thing about male culture is our brash forthright criticisms. A nice contrast to the couched insults women often are in the habit of.
/r/MensRights24/04/17 06:42 AM
21

Basically yeah. Although in an even broader sense. Cuckoos: kill your eggs, trick you into raising theirs Cuckolded: your wife is impregnated by another man, you raise the children as your own without knowing Cuckold fetishism: grossly misuses the term to represent guys who encourage their wives to sleep with other men. Completely ignores the root being about deception/childrearing. Cucks: basically a.neogism used to insult people in the friend zone who solidify their place with pandering to wom…
/r/MensRights24/04/17 06:39 AM
4

Quotes like these would work better if they were dated.
/r/MensRights24/04/17 06:32 AM
1

No you didn't put it to rest. Prepubescent chests and boob Assume some good faith here: I may simply be confused about where your comments are being directed. Accept you may be unclear about them. If HSOTD can't be used to justify the example of hairless vulvas, clits, then don't use it. You didn't exactly give any other examples to ask about. It can safely be assumed most girls in high school are pubescent, the only prepubescent ones would be grade-skippers.
/r/MensRights24/04/17 06:31 AM
1

Irrelevant, you may have good radar or be assuming the sum of your friends behavior is only that which you witness. Women virtue signal just like men and many humans often behave humanely for the purposes of impressing potential allies. This is no guarantee it will be consistent in situations not prime for signaling.
/r/MensRights24/04/17 06:25 AM
2

Cynical yes, bullshit no. Your rose lens are still half on. Your description implies I think all women want to oppress men. I never said that. Rather: a very large portion would not care enough to fight to free us from oppression. They might not push for it, but they would also not push against it. Women do not volunteer to combat male struggles the same way we do for theirs.
/r/MensRights24/04/17 06:24 AM
1

I feel you. Many sites I used to browse let me down in mobile. I remember when YouTubs was smooth.
/r/MensRights24/04/17 06:21 AM
1

I think of this as a case where it may be most acceptable to say there isn't anything near enough to begin guessing about. At best we will base it in intangible perceptions instead of numbers.
/r/MensRights24/04/17 06:20 AM
1

Your comment was uncalled for. If you do not apologize, O'Shaunnessy will never forgive.
/r/MensRights24/04/17 06:08 AM
1

Actually I think most people are ignorant of the quite which is why we had to dig it up during the election. Maybe her logic is "rape is worse than death" and the primary victims argument is based in her assuming more women get raped than men in wartime? That is at least possible. But male rape victims are often ignored in wars so I wouldn't take even this for granted.
/r/MensRights24/04/17 06:04 AM
1

I don't think panty shots of fictional characters under 18 is illegal, Arthur had them and FBI didn't go for PBS. Maybe these "slit" shots are a different story but it seems like a potentially difficult thing in some situations to discern a silhouette from a ruffle. If there is a particular image you are referring to, it should be simple enough to find the girl in the HSOD wikia which probably states her age. I don't usually pay much attention to western changes. I know some wrote with outright …
/r/MensRights23/04/17 06:30 AM
1

This depends a lot on perception of innocence. For example a cop Michael Pena was accused of raping a woman at gunpoint but pleads innocent. It is possible if his accuser is innocent but can't prove a crime that she might be criticized. Where OP varies is people are accepting the idea that it occurred and just not caring. Rather than contesting it.
/r/MensRights23/04/17 06:03 AM
4

I do not agree. Lacking empathy for something doesn't necessarily mean you hate them, just that you do not love them enough to quell sadistic delight. As a kid I felt that way about flies. I did not hate them, I just found it interesting to tear off their wings and see what they would do. I think a lot of women look at men like that. I treat mice a bit better than this. I feel sad thinking about how they die but still leave out traps to kill them to protect my food. I think a lot of women also t…
/r/MensRights23/04/17 05:57 AM
19

http://ageofshitlords.com/men-accused-gamergate-misogyny-now-jail
/r/MensRights23/04/17 05:48 AM
1

I haven't gotten to seeing it yet but HSOD looks like a bunch of tittymonsters so it may not be the best candidate for your subtle-loli argument. Something like Lucky Star would work better where even the teachers/moms are all drawn chibi-moe. Also if HSOD fails your test because "mentally in school" then how harsh are you on Link from Ocarina of Time or Lion-o from.original Thundercats? Are adult Malone/Ruto and adult Amazons pedophiles for liking the muscular adult bodies of the protagonists b…
/r/MensRights22/04/17 11:51 PM
1

Giving examples of more mature looking women doesn't necessarily help to understand what traits you are comparing when you make that evaluation. Assuming you concur that Faye Valentine looks more mature (I would agree) I an not sure how we make that evaluation in terms if explaining criteria. Radical Edward is clearly loli but I think the OP looks closer to Faye than to Ed.
/r/MensRights22/04/17 11:45 PM
1

I'm still not understansing the "frame of a child" thing. What dimension ratios are you talking about here? You have referred to shoulders but not in a specific enough way for me to understand. If you were to artisticlly modify the OP to look more "adult" by altering her shoulders, how would you be changing them? Would they be broader? Larger delt muscles? Carried higher or lower? Retracted or protracted?
/r/MensRights22/04/17 11:42 PM
1

HSOD obviously being High School Girls doesn't mean they are closer to loli than to adult. The girl I posted is also described as high school and sexual characteristics seem too far along tonne preoubescent On the spectrum from pettanko to MEGAMILK sure she is closer to the former, but that applies to any realistic depiction of Japanese women who aren't breastfeeding. If you want to know what a girl with glasses and short hair like this would look like as an actual loli: http://www.myfconline.co…
/r/MensRights22/04/17 11:38 PM
2

Anime doesn't exactly have speech bubbles to convey dialogue. Watches Golden Boy years ago so I can't recall if any of the women complained about permission-asking. If you can locate an alternate example of request-shaming with imagery you find less offensive, I would be glad to substitute it.
/r/MensRights22/04/17 11:25 PM
2

That could be viewed as patronizing, which sounds a lot like patriarchy.
/r/MensRights22/04/17 11:21 PM
1

I don't recall.claiming the girl is 18, just that she isn't prepubescent. Whoever did the English rewrite had a line about her being in high school so I figure late teens. How old are these gettyimage duo? 15 and 45 or something? Being closer to a teen girl than to a 40something wrinklemom (however fit) doesnt make it prepubescent or pedophilia. I mean hell, 18 year olds are closer in age to 10 year than to 42 year olds by thrice as many years (8 v 24) I don't get how you can exclude breasts.fro…
/r/MensRights22/04/17 11:18 PM
1

Rape conviction quantity is probably closer to actual rapes than reported rape quantity, but while they matter, they can't be relied upon to make declarations like men being raked less than women. Until we know just bow less often men perceive/report raoe than women, or how less.often we get convictions than female complainants, conviction differences cannot be relied on to illustrate women being victimized more.
/r/MensRights22/04/17 11:09 PM
1

What concession does this refer to? I see this as.the wrong discussion, better to ask "how ignorant is too ignorant". I don't care if a guy is 40, if he doesn't understand what herpes is he shouldn't be allowed to fuck anyone.
/r/MensRights21/04/17 04:57 AM
1

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/9/9e/Child_development_stages.svg/1024px-Child_development_stages.svg.png For girls yellow seems to go green around 9
/r/MensRights21/04/17 04:55 AM
3

Can we call her ClemFord or something so we don't confuse her with The Walking Dead Game's heroine?
/r/MensRights21/04/17 04:48 AM
-2

"Father of all bombs" it is. I'm not even mad. I wonder if she realizes that "mother" is often a polite way of saying "mother fucker" in which case it isn't actually describing a bomb as a female but rather as.a.thing which dominates females. Kind of like "son of a bitch" being abbreviated "sumbitch". Something tells ms.she would read this as "some bitch" and think it was a feminine descriptor. In which case she would probably take an entirely different objection to it. If weapons were literally…
/r/MensRights21/04/17 04:47 AM
1

No reliable source can exist on the odds of males.being raped because we do not have accurate reporting.
/r/MensRights21/04/17 04:44 AM
1

Stats are irrelevant considering his under reported rape would be by men.
/r/MensRights21/04/17 04:43 AM
1

That is with her top on, reduction could be due to bra or chest binding. It isn't clear as it jumps from shirt in to completely topless in the next panel. http://i.imgur.com/97zbNhS.jpg here is a shot showing the shoulder/breast ratio better via the upper cleavage. http://i.imgur.com/u1GRQPS.jpg shows they are at least double fist size. Actually more since cropping to keep nipples out requires no showing the full shape. Best I can do while keeping it censored. This might be an artstyle thing. I'…
/r/MensRights21/04/17 04:34 AM
3

I think every time I come across this consent-seeking-shaming in comics I will try to note it. It reflects pretty realistic attitudes about how women will reject men as unassertive for making verbal requests. Naturally feminists do not target these women even though they are the core cause. If women utterly hated any man who did things without asking they would alter their behaviors or be fast from society. The silent approval they get is what encourages the behavior in others..we witness it.
/r/MensRights21/04/17 04:26 AM
1

Nope, not prepubescent. This would be very clear if I hadn't cropped off the following panel depicting the large breasts. I figured nudity wasn't appropriate.
/r/MensRights21/04/17 04:23 AM
1

Sure she will. It is only a mistake if the guy is prepared and even though I watched the vid a couple times before I haven't memories it and wouldn't have a rehearsed comeback if accuses of it. I would still fumble trying to explain it in my own terms and not be so eloquent.
/r/MensRights20/04/17 08:13 PM
1

A confession would be fine. I am talking about situations where the accused isnt pleasing guilty. Witnesses depend in credibility. The cyclists in the Brock Turner case, for example, aren't credible because they would be charged with assault if Brock was recognized as innocent.
/r/MensRights20/04/17 09:00 AM
1

Consuming media for free does not support the industry producing the media.
/r/MensRights20/04/17 08:57 AM
1

These dilemmas can be avoided by not criminalizing possession. The priority should be catching whoever is doing the stuff on the videos and making them stop. That is the only win of import. Letting cops pretend they are winning by arresting viewers just distracts from the core issue.
/r/MensRights20/04/17 08:56 AM
0

I am not disgusted. I do not think possession deserves jail time. At best some light community service which can be waved if the possessor aids authorities by telling them where they for it so they can move on to investigate higher up the ladder: distributors, then creators. Purchasing it, on the other hand, should face stiffer penalties, since that may support its creation, but only if paying directly to a creator or a distributor who bought from one.
/r/MensRights20/04/17 08:54 AM
2

I was gravely disappointed when Secretary of State Elizabeth McCord accused Chief of Staff Russell Jackson of mansplaining. I still watch Madams Secretary but it is further tarnished. I guess I built up a tolerance knowing it was intended as pro-Hillary propaganda from the start.
/r/MensRights20/04/17 08:50 AM
1

That is a decent analogy. Swatting can be more immediately dangerous but I think false accusations cause more long term inconvenience assuming the first encounter doesn't end fatally.
/r/MensRights20/04/17 08:47 AM
1

Knowing crimes can be committed in cases where they can't be proven is different from thinking this should mean we should allow criminal convictions without decent evidence.
/r/MensRights20/04/17 08:46 AM
3

Seems more like a cause of violent crime. Like for example paying a hitman isn't inherently violent but you are basically the cause of the murder the hitman commits.
/r/MensRights19/04/17 08:15 AM
3

OP needs to go MTF.
/r/MensRights19/04/17 08:13 AM
1

In the last election it was shark v pirahna. Trump didn't say stuff like women being the primary victims of war.
/r/MensRights19/04/17 08:12 AM
1

You point out the double standard well. Consent is only considered important when it suits society's disgust, and informedness is weighed to very different cutoffs. Realistically speaking, allowing teens to play sports is probably a much higher risk to their health.
/r/MensRights19/04/17 08:11 AM
1

Everyone has consent to give, no matter the age. The question is how informed the mind giving it is. Thus "informed consent" being a thing. This automatically creates.an opposite "uninformed consent". So consent from the uninformed is still consent.
/r/MensRights19/04/17 08:08 AM
0

Trump didn't say anything wrong. He was asked about teacher student sex. Only prob I see is impyignmng female students don't also enjoy it.
/r/MensRights19/04/17 08:06 AM
1

Only in the sense of reputation, maybe The idea we.view sex as something inherently harmful is problematic though. These things are harmful only in specific scenarios based in specific problems.
/r/MensRights19/04/17 08:05 AM
1

The ideal relationship is mutually advantageous. So there is nothing wrong with.taking advantage of someone so long as they consent and take advantage of you in return.
/r/MensRights19/04/17 08:04 AM
1

I don't agree male sex drive is necessarily create than female. Female is just subtler. Anything that can walk is clearly also wrong.
/r/MensRights19/04/17 08:03 AM
1

Your post is misleading. Trump was only asked about teachers having sex with students. Nothing about that implied rape. He wasn't told the age of the boys so you can't take the statutory approach. Not everyone necessarily takes.the feminist approach that sex with someone under the age of consent should be labelled rape. I find "unlawful sex" a more accurate descriptor.
/r/MensRights19/04/17 08:02 AM
1

No, hey at offering conditional support relying in realistic doubts which juries presently ignore. The problem is yes, that non-video cases even go to trial. The only provable rape is videotaped rape.
/r/MensRights19/04/17 06:27 AM
1

We should just get a 50/50 quota for teachers. Don't they do this in other government fields?
/r/MensRights19/04/17 06:25 AM
2

We should send all women who give birth naturally to jail for forcing a baby to touch her labia without receiving consent from them. The only way to avoid this is to give birth by caesarian section.
/r/MensRights19/04/17 06:24 AM
2

Surely there exists a Lego Barbie. I would recommend Nya from Ninjago, Macy from NexonKnights, and the eagle from China.
/r/MensRights19/04/17 06:21 AM
1

I am beginning to understand the real reason boys are falling behind girls in later academic strata.
/r/MensRights19/04/17 06:18 AM
3

I like your take in things here. I hadn't encountered this approach before.
/r/MensRights19/04/17 06:14 AM
2

I would be more hopeful about this if I wasn't s e that kick start would shut it down in response to feminist pressuring about how it is "misogynist rape apologism".
/r/MensRights19/04/17 06:14 AM
1

You won't find absolute evidence for either so you have to reach conclusions through the best available. You want evidence that speaking is easier than combat?
/r/MensRights17/04/17 04:45 AM
1

The comparative eftectiveness is arguable.
/r/MensRights17/04/17 04:43 AM
1

I try to keep an eye open but the most dangerous won't display these openly to a male and do it out of our perception. What then?
/r/MensRights17/04/17 04:42 AM
1

I would give you gaiaonline gold for this post.
/r/MensRights15/04/17 07:50 AM
1

There is a stark contrast between arguing only men have problems and arguing men have worse problems. People rarely do the former in any seriousness.
/r/MensRights15/04/17 07:45 AM
1

There is no "the definition" of anything. Most major dictionary definitions are manipulated socially. If they published something unacceptable they would be persecuted. You can't rely on encyclopedias and dictionaries for the truth in some matters.
/r/MensRights15/04/17 07:43 AM
1

Women fear losing community worship. Men fear gaining community persecution.
/r/MensRights15/04/17 07:42 AM
3

Aladdin at least had a princess accepting a street rat.... All he had to do was rescue her empire from a sorcerer and risk death multiple times, proving he accepts his own disposability.
/r/MensRights15/04/17 07:41 AM
3

I wouldn't jump to assume autism just because we are unsure what women want. Many women flirt with men they aren't romantically interested in to gain social favours. It is intrinsically confusing.
/r/MensRights15/04/17 07:39 AM
3

You're that guy with the formatting skills. Seen you before.
/r/MensRights15/04/17 07:37 AM
1

Why is that sure? If I can think that way why can't a woman?
/r/MensRights15/04/17 07:36 AM
1

Implying first and second wave worlds would be safe for us?
/r/MensRights15/04/17 07:35 AM
2

Women encourage men to kill each other.
/r/MensRights15/04/17 07:35 AM
1

True, but it is a gamble that the good ones will make character witnesses. Except sue to duh sisterhood they won't betray their own.
/r/MensRights15/04/17 07:34 AM
1

How? Video+audio tapenevery interaction with female friend? Sounds exhausting.
/r/MensRights15/04/17 07:32 AM
1

OP come join us at wizardchan.
/r/MensRights15/04/17 07:31 AM
1

How many have you collected?
/r/MensRights15/04/17 07:30 AM
2

Why? Lying is easier than assault and carries less risk to the person to do. Why do you find this hard to accept? Evidence isn't needed. Common sense bro.
/r/MensRights15/04/17 07:29 AM
1

don't call us heroes. We're something else. We're legends.
/r/MensRights15/04/17 07:13 AM
1

Taking forty cakes from someone is worse than raping them.
/r/MensRights15/04/17 06:40 AM
1

Additive math doesn't necessarily apply to many human situations. I have a cat that makes me happy. Do you think if I got 99 additional cats to live with me it would make me 100x happier?
/r/MensRights15/04/17 06:39 AM
1

I figure they intrepet the bull as progress for men only so she is going to ride it or mislead it?
/r/MensRights13/04/17 08:21 AM
1

Artist should be happy about the attention this complimentary work has brought to his piece. You can measure popularity by porn. Prior to this it was only popular enough to inspire a single pornographic parody: involving Dubya http://rule34.paheal.net/post/view/1785138 and now there are a half dozen more.
/r/MensRights13/04/17 08:18 AM
1

Yes. This seems like a problem. Labia are blocking out healthy bacteria killing sunlight and trapping in bacteria-laden moisture. The solution is obvious. We need to prevent this problem.as soon as possible, surgically. Come to think of it, wombs are pretty moist and dark too. We are endangering babies by allowing them to fester in such an environment.
/r/MensRights13/04/17 08:13 AM
1

I think you fail to see the damage murder can cause to a family. Someone murdered is completely gone. Someone raped under 9000 times is inconvenienced.
/r/MensRights13/04/17 08:10 AM
1

I don't think patriarchs actually care about panties..this isn't patriarchy its a culture of men afraid of being thought of as gay. Insecure thirsty betas. Patriarchs are alpha.
/r/MensRights13/04/17 08:09 AM
1

It is worse, just not 100x worse. Also no, trauma may increase but it doesn't multiply. The first would be worst and then have diminishing returns after it was adapted.to unless you started doing worse things.
/r/MensRights13/04/17 08:08 AM
1

Hiding a baby and hiding its paternity are differentthings.
/r/MensRights10/04/17 06:21 AM
1

The dilemma of time... I could fire up the PC and spend an hour in her vids.. But I haven't even watches Ring of Honor this week, and Dalton Castle is more fulfilling than Anita reruns. Would be interested in reading any critique you might make to the rebuttals to her vids which have existed for 4 years.
/r/MensRights10/04/17 06:20 AM
1

It wasn't a photo, it was a video clip. I am dismissing her credibility. It proves you can't take for granted her competence or truthfulness. It is an example. If you want other examples, others have done more thorough rebuttals to her videos. Which have you watched? Which points are you defending which you attribute to her? In relation to what games?
/r/MensRights10/04/17 06:17 AM
-3

People can regret bad behavior no matter how much of it they did. I think we should base sentencing on harm done not speculation about how much someone might have regretted. A priest who rapes a boy 900 times has still done less harm to society if he raoes the same boy another 900 times. 1800 rapes still leaves a human being shils murder doesn't.
/r/MensRights10/04/17 06:14 AM
1

How beautiful was the 26 year old woman in question? Any picture?
/r/MensRights10/04/17 06:09 AM
1

Let's not make assumptions
/r/MensRights10/04/17 06:07 AM
3

I think bacteria thrive better in moist dark areas. I think human lips help to block light and keep in moisture. Do you have any ideas on how to prevent dental caries?
/r/MensRights10/04/17 06:05 AM
3

All things are comparable, and some forms of FGM.are equivalent or even less harmful than male circumcision. Female circumcision for example, also called a hoodectomy, removes the clitoral hood, the female prepuce..it is anakagous although I rank it as less harmful because it is less flesh. Clitoral ritual pinpricks are also much less harmful. If I could get stabbed in the dick by a needle to get my foreskin back I would. Some forms are worse, like complete amputation of the clitoral head, but n…
/r/MensRights10/04/17 06:02 AM
7

We can make this happen. Someone should write this.
/r/MensRights10/04/17 05:59 AM
2

Thank you Peter Griffin.
/r/MensRights10/04/17 05:58 AM
2

There are a lot of embelishers on this sub who like to call all unlawful sex with minors rape when it comes to older female younger male since we so often see that dine with older male younger female. I see.that as lowering ourselves to their level.
/r/MensRights10/04/17 05:58 AM
1

You mean that by naming her it would name the daughter? In this case she should not be allowed to raise her daughter. The daughter should be issued a new legal name and raised by her father elsewhere. Or by foster care if the father isnt possible. That way the woman could be named. Abusers should not be given incentive to reproduce by knowing that children will shield them from public scorn. Something tells me that fathers still end up getting named.
/r/MensRights10/04/17 05:55 AM
3

Disgust is subjective.
/r/MensRights10/04/17 05:53 AM
2

What is insulting about manpanties?
/r/MensRights10/04/17 05:53 AM
2

Single quotes meaning you acknowledge it is inappropriate to call her a pedophile since 12 isn't prepubescent? The pregnancy is a clear indicator of puberty.
/r/MensRights10/04/17 05:51 AM
1

Maybe she cannot be named because the editor told him not to rather than actual laws saying he couldn't.
/r/MensRights10/04/17 05:50 AM
1

Unless.of.course the daughter.knew and encouraged it.
/r/MensRights10/04/17 05:49 AM
1

This is why we need register-her.
/r/MensRights10/04/17 05:48 AM
1

Serial rapists could be charged once per victim and get multiple sentences that way. More than one charge per victim.gets silly though. To allow that we.need some.kind of time limit. Like 1 charge per year. So.Josef fritz.who.jails you 9 years could get 9 charges I guess. I still don't like his that could lead to longer than murder though..murder should always be longest.
/r/MensRights10/04/17 05:48 AM
-1

The amount of rapes should change whether you get minimum or maximum length. Think about if jail sentencing for theft was a dollars>days conversion. It gets silly. Rape denies people control over their life for a period of time. Murder denies that control their entire remaining g lifespan. Base sentence on that. When does rape 1 end and rape 2 begin? Is each thrust potentially a discrete rape? Fuck that, 1 count of rape max per alleged victim is how it ought to be, just like murder. No double di…
/r/MensRights10/04/17 05:44 AM
2

I agree with you. I mean technically honking a tit is sexual assault so if you honked a tit 1000x you could in theory get 1000x the sexual assault sentence... But no matter how you look at it, getting your tit honked 1000 times.isnt as bad as getting murdered so quantity over atrocity shouldn't lead to longer sentences. At some point you need to fold lesser offenses into larger ones. There should.be a maximum of 1 rape charge per victim per year. Consider separate days withing that year as one r…
/r/MensRights10/04/17 05:40 AM
0

I don't feel comfortable assuming this was rape. Article does call it sexual abuse, and being the mother of the girlfriend does put one in a position of abusable power. Abusers/abusers and rapers/rapees do have some form of relationship. Relationships can be negative things. Donald Trump and Hilary Clinton have a relationship.
/r/MensRights10/04/17 05:36 AM
1

Break rooms.usually have open doors, cubicles aren't enclosed, possible witnesses in either case.
/r/MensRights10/04/17 05:31 AM
1

I formed.these.opinions when watching her content years ago so remembering the specifics is hard. I guess one of these.days I ought to rewatch them and take detailed notes. Normally when I make.critical observations of arguments I leave them for posterity in video comments, but you know why I couldn't do that.
/r/MensRights10/04/17 05:30 AM
1

This is not an off topic example. Anita used a clip from the anime while discussing Peach being a helpless damsel and cherrypicks a moment of her hiding behind Mario, even though Mario hides behind her twice, and she engages in combat several times. There was.nothing to "miss". Peach hiding behind mario (taking a breather after battling dozens of enemies, which Anita did not show) happened a couple seconds before Mario running behind her in response. Either Anita intentionally left it out or she…
/r/MensRights10/04/17 05:28 AM
2

I don't recognize that sense. Very different words. Even natural... Body mod is human behavior so it is part of nature. I prefer to just debuted identify it as crippling mutilation.
/r/MensRights07/04/17 07:13 AM
1

What reports say about alleged male abuses do not necessarily correlate with real dangers.
/r/MensRights07/04/17 07:12 AM
3

We grow weary of the victim complex. I don't trust the dishonest Anita or Zoe to make accurate reports. If they want people to trust in their complaints they should have avoided deviousness in their behaviors. Many feminists expect men to be doormats. Wanting to advance female status doesn't require aiming for equality.
/r/MensRights07/04/17 07:08 AM
3

None if the attention is violent. She has never been attacked. None is misogynist either. Nothing sent to her attacks all women. Anita is moced personally. She.deserves it for her dishonesty.
/r/MensRights07/04/17 07:05 AM
2

She doesn't literally say all, no, but she misrepresents it, inflates it. People embellish to absolutes for effect when paraphrasing. I dislike it, creates a natural target to attack to distract from the key issues.
/r/MensRights07/04/17 07:04 AM
1

Where to begin? I always start with her misrepresentation of Peach in the Mario anime. She is dishonest.
/r/MensRights07/04/17 07:02 AM
1

I would like to thank the three of you for that.
/r/MensRights07/04/17 07:01 AM
1

Pic related I think male MT are expected to take their sexiness for granted as a selling point, have a thicker skin, while the thirst for female MTs is so solid they can be pickier with their standards for client behavior.
/r/MensRights07/04/17 06:57 AM
1

It could refer to birth certificate.
/r/MensRights07/04/17 06:52 AM
1

Women do shit like this because ethey know they won't get hit.
/r/MensRights07/04/17 06:51 AM
1

Loved that Brass Eye special. Also influenced the Monkeydust cartoon series.
/r/MensRights07/04/17 06:50 AM
1

Allegedly. More likely: children hold more loyalty to biological fathers than step fathers and will be more willing to lie about a stepdad to help the mom, or get her mom back together with her dad.
/r/MensRights07/04/17 06:49 AM
1

Interesting cite. Presently https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dartos only refers to muscles exising in the scrotum. Perhaps you could incorporate this info?
/r/MensRights07/04/17 06:40 AM
1

Normality is subjective. It fan be normal to cut off your breast in respect to some amazon tribe to example.
/r/MensRights07/04/17 06:38 AM
3

The traction circumcision has is what opens my ear to /pol/ theories of Jewish control.
/r/MensRights07/04/17 06:36 AM
3

We should go about challenging this. Discriminating against people with/without spouses/children or of a specific gender is just as bad as siscriminating against a race or orientation or disability.
/r/MensRights07/04/17 06:33 AM
0

The outlawing of rape. Clearly other values take priority over people getting access to the sex they want.
/r/MensRights07/04/17 06:31 AM
0

There are people in every generation who say that to resist change. I can posit that having laws in the first place is extreme, since extremity is subjective. Are driving exams convoluted? They seek simple enough. Makes sense to have them for all dangerous activities.
/r/MensRights07/04/17 06:30 AM
0

A minority perhaps, or maybe just a silent majority fearful of drug addicts and not wanting to enrage them.
/r/MensRights07/04/17 06:28 AM
1

Maybe we are thinking if different things for the term. Having a conversation with others in the room?
/r/MensRights07/04/17 06:27 AM
1

I wouldn't say feminism requires hate. It is strongly correlated with it, sure, but it could simply mean you love women much more than men and always give them priority. I am like that with the life of my cat vs the lives of garage rats but it doesn't mean I hate the rats, even as I trap and kill them to protect my cat from perceived disease and starvation.
/r/MensRights06/04/17 04:06 AM
1

Are you sure the Facebook community you're in isn't called Atheism Plus (atheism+) or something similar?
/r/MensRights06/04/17 04:02 AM
1

I already view.society that way. A license to consume alcohol also seems like an excellent idea to me.
/r/MensRights04/04/17 08:40 AM
1

It is basic but it isnt "very" important..it isn't required for living and pent up urges can be expelled alone. I'm sure when they first started requiring licenses to practise medicine or drive, there.were those who viewed those restrictions as dystopiac. If we are going to divide people into "let them fuck" and "prevent their fucks" on the basis of maturity we should measure the maturity and not make physically prejudiced generalizations. Middle ground also exists. Require passing test to fuck …
/r/MensRights04/04/17 08:38 AM
1

They just better hit the books. Society has taken the stance that sex isn't a fundamental right for all.
/r/MensRights04/04/17 08:34 AM
1

Much as I would like to promise that I would probably be too afraid the the boy's mom making up false molestation accusations to come near.
/r/MensRights04/04/17 08:32 AM
1

This would be a political process, much as age of consent laws and studies/papers cited to propose alterations in laws currently are. This is something you would need many experts to weigh in on. What knowledge someone should have. What traits they must demonstrate. Basically what quantities do we assume are present in adults to entrust them with these freedoms. We should deny the freedom to adults lacking those traits/knowledge and extend the freedom to minors possessing those traits/knowledge.
/r/MensRights04/04/17 08:30 AM
1

Tree fiddy was a joke you missed. Passing would hinge more in quality/difficulty of questions, not quantity. If someone lacked the patience to do this they are probably too impulsive to be trusted to sexual freedoms. How exactly is wanting a test kids cannot pass an excuse to bone them? The test should be as hard as it needs to be to guarantee safety and a stable society. If I set.standards too high then feel free to say how much you would lower them.
/r/MensRights04/04/17 08:27 AM
1

The way the world.works.has changedover time. I don't know how discussing something already outlawed suddenly is "every freedom" under attack.
/r/MensRights04/04/17 08:24 AM
1

Case in point, when Ariel Winter came in Raw during Valentines Day to promote the Chaperone and snogged Hornswoggle. http://i.imgur.com/PolR5.png Albeit pity-frenching is probably rarer. If Ariel had done that she probably wouldn't have landed her Disney role as Sofia.
/r/MensRights04/04/17 08:21 AM
1

Do you think it could refer to spouses hitting each other in the street instead of inside the house?
/r/MensRights04/04/17 08:18 AM
1

I am open for them testing to get licenses for those freedoms if they can prove competent knowledge in those areas. Yes I do think there should be laws. I can't see how someone in grade 3 would understand microbiology enough to pass a proper test which should include all knowledge of STDs.
/r/MensRights04/04/17 08:14 AM
1

We already do this by denying sex between normal adults and adult retards with kid minds.
/r/MensRights04/04/17 08:12 AM
1

Expert assessment.
/r/MensRights04/04/17 08:11 AM
1

Being able to consent is as simple as saying "yes", a capability attained by most before kindergarten. The key issue is that we also require consent to be adequately informed and relatively free of coercion. Defining "legal consent" as requiring that is reasonable. But you should always use the full LC term. Do not abbreviate it as just "consent". Same with IC and UC. Presently that is approximated by an age point but I think there are potentially fairer ways to approximate those variables bette…
/r/MensRights04/04/17 08:09 AM
1

I would say no sex by default and if people want to fuck without going to jail they should get a license for it by passing a series of about 350 skill testing questions, like with driving, which is much more dangerous.
/r/MensRights04/04/17 08:06 AM
1

Please clarify what you are talking about by linking to a thread.
/r/MensRights04/04/17 08:04 AM
1

How exactly does a 15 year old consenting to sex go from not-rape with a 17 year old to always-rape with an 18 year old? Closenage exemptions don't make sense, a younger partner doesn't enhance your maturity or understanding of sex.
/r/MensRights04/04/17 08:02 AM
2

Hasn't been 14 in Canada since around 2009 if I recall. Was changed to 16 by conservatives..18 to avoid "power" text, 19 to drink, 20 for freedom to say " I don't fuck teens" as a some counter to accusations.
/r/MensRights04/04/17 07:59 AM
1

We are aware of the present laws. I see no value in your reiterating them. Trygold was discussing decriminalization so your interjecting " but it is a crime" is pointless. The ability to make rational choices isn't tied to a specific number (better to test to treat outliers fairly) and doesn't change based in the age of the partner. If 15 is illegal for 30 then it should.be illegal for 15 too.
/r/MensRights04/04/17 07:57 AM
1

To play devil's.advocate here: fear of upsetting a teacher by getting them into trouble would not exist if the relationship were not outlawed.
/r/MensRights04/04/17 07:53 AM
1

If anon imqgeboards had a.like system you woukdnsee it. People are careful not to place controversial votes when namefagging it up on reddit/facebook
/r/MensRights04/04/17 07:52 AM
1

I don't see anything wrong with her views here. More so the hypocrisy in that.she would still be fine cozying up to those who would persecute a male writing similar words.
/r/MensRights04/04/17 07:50 AM
1

I think the worry is that if student/teacher relations are tolerated, the students who do this will get preferential treatment, or possibly punitive grading if they refuse.
/r/MensRights04/04/17 07:47 AM
2

I don't see how you can support that initial argument. Most jobs.don't entail such situations.
/r/MensRights04/04/17 07:42 AM
1

A restaurant isn't technically being alone though. But in a sense maybe since other diners won't pay attention to you.
/r/MensRights04/04/17 07:40 AM
1

You are arguing a straw man. "Can" is a counter to "cannot" which PeteyMax didn't use. He said "unlikely" so if you were disagreeing with what you quoted you should be saying "sexual assault is likely to have long term consequences". If that was.your intent then please apologize and reframe your argument.
/r/MensRights04/04/17 07:39 AM
1

Not.sure what you two are arguing about. Pence, with all his power and resources, still takes basic precautions, so it shows normal mnmen should even more so.
/r/MensRights04/04/17 07:36 AM
1

Pastors: what about confession booth?
/r/MensRights04/04/17 07:32 AM
1

The difference being of course that Russian bankers haven't been collectively abusing their meetings.with men, they are just victims of antiRussian prejudice. Women have been collectively abusing private meetings with men so it wouldn't be sexism to react to it.
/r/MensRights04/04/17 07:31 AM
1

She believed, or SAID she believed?
/r/MensRights04/04/17 07:29 AM
1

Your apprehension is cuteicle
/r/MensRights03/04/17 06:28 AM
7

There is very much a way. Girls can pity kiss a lot of guys they won't fuck.
/r/MensRights03/04/17 06:25 AM
3

Some of them are, which can skew the stats. Accidental falls can still happen from bad choices. Like wearing heels, running in them, being drunk, not focusing on your ambulation. http://www.feminist.com/antiviolence/facts.html Somehow they thought this relevant to include as #22
/r/MensRights03/04/17 06:22 AM
0

Well, if it was hair or fingernails...
/r/MensRights03/04/17 06:19 AM
2

I say this as an avid RoK reader who thinks they have all sorts of good things to say... In this case i wouldn't agree with the title. I would say that anime simply reflects an aspect of sexuality that already exists rather than programming it. Would we accuse UFC of programming guys to like attractive card holders? Violence from women toward men is generally perceived as sexy because it is a sexy girl doing it. Anime did not invent Masochism. One series I an find if titled MM! is actually based…
/r/MensRights03/04/17 05:50 AM
1

Or just get their tongues/lips cut off.
/r/MensRights01/04/17 08:45 AM
1

Does having procreative sex with your wife qualify as a religious activity? God said to be fruitful and multiply. Presumably since Muhammed wed Aisha ~6 and consummated their marriage ~9 this should also qualify as a religious activity deserving protection? The silly thing about this is I doubt god would've gave a shit how you got rid of the blood coming out of the babies he commanded you to mutilate. Pretty sure the mohels of the past simply used a low tech solution because they lacked the pres…
/r/MensRights01/04/17 08:44 AM
1

Lacking a wife didn't mean a guy was lazy. Work was not as pljripotent as you seem to think. There was a lot of poverty.
/r/MensRights27/03/17 08:43 AM
2

Not sure if gelatin counts as furry. http://rule34.paheal.net/post/list/Gummi_Bears/1 would though
/r/MensRights21/03/17 10:53 AM
0

Our work is generally easier and safer too. You think a century ago all men had wives or maids?
/r/MensRights21/03/17 10:52 AM
1

Ah... Trinity was Carrie Anne Moss, my mistake. For some reason they blend together. Similar characters or bland acting maybe? I just mean.seductive in comparison to jovovich in RE
/r/MensRights21/03/17 10:51 AM
1

Why are you so upset about the idea of pushing a cart? If shopping is a waste of.time then you don't go at all. If you are spending it then cart pushing is no extra investment.
/r/MensRights21/03/17 10:47 AM
2

Implying I have listened to fewer women's stories because I don't hold the opinion of them being worse off?
/r/MensRights21/03/17 10:45 AM
4

I can't help but wonder if she is being ironic. Also worth noting that "smash" is sometimes slang for "have sex with" rather than "destroy". I could care less about cart pushing. I like using my hands. Makes it go faster. A woman shouldnt callus up her stroking palms on a public handle.
/r/MensRights19/03/17 02:26 AM
1

Cook/clean/laundry takes less time today due to tech. Whoever ends up doing it isn't doing the same work done an century ago. Gadgets do change a lot. Try to appreciate what a freezer/fridge/stove represent. Houses are probably more expensive now because of their higher standards and less available land. A man can afford to support wife/kids if being minimalist. It becomes untenable due to wastefulness and people wanting extra conveniences.
/r/MensRights19/03/17 02:22 AM
2

Cheetos moisten http://rule34.paheal.net/post/view/297485
/r/MensRights19/03/17 02:18 AM
3

Implying http://rule34.paheal.net/post/list/Gummy_Bears/1 doesn't get ladies randy
/r/MensRights19/03/17 02:16 AM
3

It is often too slow to sink in for me when I am being trolled. Fun real-time chattin with ya mate.
/r/MensRights19/03/17 02:13 AM
3

This isn't wikipedia, we are free to analyze history and are not limited to politically correct arguments. It is in the name and has always been obvious in the priorities from the beginning. Suffragettes only wanted the vote, not the draft. Egalitarians would have moved for both or neither. Equality for women isn't just giving women male advantages. It must also be giving men female advantages or else discarding them and coming down to male level.
/r/MensRights19/03/17 02:10 AM
3

Evidence that the idea of cultural Marxism was crucial to German national socialism in the 30s. Where is it?
/r/MensRights19/03/17 02:08 AM
3

Frequency of punishment is irrelevant to truth of misdeed frequency.
/r/MensRights19/03/17 02:07 AM
6

It is an uneducated guess to assume that those who cry out the most are in the most pain. It only means they are the ones most cared about. Who expect assistance. Male victims who rightly lack confidence they will get woman-level sympathy will more often not sacrifice their time and hopes.
/r/MensRights19/03/17 02:06 AM
2

What stuff? Please provide some convincing evidence that millions died as a result of the idea of cultural Marxism.
/r/MensRights19/03/17 02:03 AM
1

And then get fired as his bosses brand him an antisemite.
/r/MensRights19/03/17 02:02 AM
3

If that happened I would consider it unethical for any woman to name a father in France and consider any who did so slavers who do not deserve life. I would nullify and attempts to convict anyone of any crime toward them.
/r/MensRights19/03/17 02:01 AM
3

I think of Glen Canning's daughter survived as a ghost she might hate her father.
/r/MensRights19/03/17 01:58 AM
3

Incorrect. Stopping at equality has never been a precept of feminism. It is "more" not "more until equal" for them.
/r/MensRights19/03/17 01:57 AM
1

That idea of associating ideas with Nazis as a defense mechanism sure is gaining steam. You remind me of the rebuttal to "lying press" slang.
/r/MensRights19/03/17 01:55 AM
3

There's nothing wrong about admitting that it happens more often to women Sure there is: because it is a lie. We can't know what the predominant gender of rapists or rapees is because we lack knowledge of all rapes.
/r/MensRights19/03/17 01:53 AM
1

I believe there are more men are falsely accused of rape than raped women falsely accused of lying about it.
/r/MensRights19/03/17 01:50 AM
16

I guess implying it must be some white suoremacy recruitment? I see it as preempting some "I bet most of the suicidal men are minorities" argument. It is showing that the big bad white man is a victim too which is important. Even if suicides were 100% male, 70% white male suicides would be alarming if whites were less than 70% of the population. If male:female was 3.5:1 then we should expect to see 70:20 meaning whites would be 90% of suicides total. Is the population 10% non whites, or more? Do…
/r/MensRights19/03/17 01:47 AM
1

I'm not sure when it took place. Seems like it was intended during off screen hours so it is possible she was during some of the EPs but it was never conveyed. I forgot if they said his many weeks in she was when she doubled over.
/r/MensRights19/03/17 01:40 AM
0

They can be
/r/MensRights19/03/17 01:38 AM
1

Possibly not seductive enough for Widow. Not against Scarlet for that role. Milla was bland and asexual as Trinity in Matrix and Alice in Resident Evil, can't bring that to Widow.
/r/MensRights19/03/17 01:36 AM
1

That is not a misquote, it is paraphrasing for a point.
/r/MensRights19/03/17 01:34 AM
1

Scarlet Johansen simply isn't manly enough to play Motoko Kusanagi. We need the right woman to convey her GAR qualities.
/r/MensRights19/03/17 01:33 AM
2

Worldwide or do you think they need more rights in every country? If I believe they have equal rights in some where you want them to have more, I would not view it as wanting equality.
/r/MensRights19/03/17 01:31 AM
2

With the socks? That would be extremely painful.
/r/MensRights19/03/17 01:29 AM
3

Generally fedora wearers are bullied not catcalled.
/r/MensRights11/03/17 05:20 AM
1

https://vndb.org/v14936
/r/MensRights11/03/17 02:24 AM
6

I'm not. She never struck me as tough enough to play the protagonist. Jovovich seems a more natura choice.
/r/MensRights11/03/17 02:23 AM
-7

I disagree. Rape isn't necessarily more serious than being bullied for your choice of clothing.
/r/MensRights11/03/17 02:22 AM
1

Rightness of body is subjective. If I think I ought to have been given a set of tentacles coming out if my lower back there isn't anything objectively wrong with that.
/r/MensRights11/03/17 02:21 AM
1

Yeah even wizardchan makes fun of him
/r/MensRights11/03/17 02:13 AM
2

Wash the played by Jim Carrie in some Biograph?
/r/MensRights11/03/17 02:11 AM
2

Nothing was hijacked. It was never about equality.
/r/MensRights11/03/17 02:10 AM
1

It isn't about equality. Never has been.
/r/MensRights11/03/17 02:09 AM
1

Technically you would only need two quotes. "Today" is a hard standard though
/r/MensRights11/03/17 02:06 AM
1

Wikiquote has both "quotes by" and "quotes about" sections. AVFM wouldn't be accepted as a source but if you can find other supports for the quotes their inclusion would be useful.
/r/MensRights11/03/17 02:05 AM
1

MRA's who The rape of the apostrophe.
/r/MensRights11/03/17 02:02 AM
2

I don't think you have examined the upper rungs of your movement. This stuff might be a bit like Xenu in Scientology though. Not revealed to initiates.
/r/MensRights11/03/17 02:00 AM
1

insert religion are generally good Is this supposed to be an example of truthfulness?
/r/MensRights11/03/17 01:57 AM
2

A lot of powerful groups are powered by weak minded masses.
/r/MensRights11/03/17 01:32 AM
2

First I heard this "grabs back" thing. Are women saying they want to give pres a HJ now?
/r/MensRights11/03/17 01:31 AM
1

Maybe you can find a candle by which light to read the map at night. Then you can find the cove. You have to go inside.
/r/MensRights11/03/17 01:29 AM
1

Know any Ontario unis devoid? Wanting job in compsi
/r/MensRights11/03/17 01:23 AM
2

You could say the same of Trigglypuff. Who is harder to believe?
/r/MensRights11/03/17 01:22 AM
1

This makes men not want to watch it. I get big red is a classic but she's overused at this point. Sick of her.
/r/MensRights11/03/17 01:20 AM
3

Awaiting the shortage of transport trucks and empty shopping malls for other shoe to drop.
/r/MensRights11/03/17 01:19 AM
3

Not sure if weak is the right word. Too influential. Petty?
/r/MensRights11/03/17 01:18 AM
1

Like for lunch? Sounds interesting. Too bad I only have the first 4 seasons in DVD before all this.
/r/MensRights11/03/17 01:07 AM
1

I watch it on CTV. Probably someone out it in YT.
/r/MensRights10/03/17 01:57 PM
1

True, tbh I never even noticed the hnts in the TV series. Though I possibly missed the episodes you are talking about. Do you recall which titles stood out? The recent Lego Batman Movie seems to be the first celebrated exploration of this dynamic.
/r/MensRights10/03/17 01:56 PM
0

You're right. I would say that. I just did.
/r/MensRights10/03/17 01:50 PM
1

Wally globe circles vs Lutheriac. THE QUESTION. In terms of live shows Vic Sage deserves his own. But barring that he would make a great supportive char in either Gotham or Arrow. I would settle for a comedy cameo in Powerless though. Love that show. Best opening music + visuals of any DC show ever made.
/r/MensRights06/03/17 03:04 PM
1

If the father will not recognize the kids then she can earn money for two or find someone else to put up the money. Perhaps a parent or a church charity. If she grows up and gets the required money she can petition the government to become the child's guardian and care worker like anyone else. Sterilization isn't too strong. Why does she need a 2nd kid? Care for the first one.
/r/MensRights06/03/17 02:48 PM
1

I grew up watching it and bought thendvd collection as adult. Am 'ware. Also revamped Mr. Zero into his scarier Mr. freeze persona with "heart of ice" if I recall. That poor DCAU is never coming back.... Closest thing now is arrowverse. Love the films but they feel so disconnected.like they just grasp at popular comic arcs.
/r/MensRights06/03/17 02:39 PM
1

Pretty much. Odds are all CP rings would die quickly via whistleblowers helping identify rapists if that was made priority.
/r/MensRights06/03/17 02:24 PM
1

Unilateral choice, unilateral responsibility. "Whatever he found"? Women are.not things. They have agency and they are the ones.who choose to do the monthlong process of growing a baby. To ignore this is to objectify women, to think of them as passive cum receptacles that men act upon and who hold no choice or responsibility in the pregnancy process. Psychological support is good. It is a surgery and even a cavity extraction can be upsetting.
/r/MensRights06/03/17 02:21 PM
-5

14-17 is men? Where does being murdered fall? Maybe suicide just seems rare.in contrast to female suicide "attempts"
/r/MensRights06/03/17 02:18 PM
1

Less unlikely than a cabby raping a passenger. I personally find urinating an easier task than assault.
/r/MensRights06/03/17 02:16 PM
1

Burden is on claimant to supply proof, not skeptics.
/r/MensRights06/03/17 02:15 PM
0

No u
/r/MensRights06/03/17 02:14 PM
1

In theory. But if they have a quota to fill and the tip doesn't lead them to an arrest, they'll fill it somehow to keep their jobs.
/r/MensRights06/03/17 02:14 PM
1

I don't understand your first sentence. It is her responsibility to arrange capital. If she is worried about a man fleeing and not paying then she should get him to pay her in advance before conceiving. Belt.issue? What is that? If a woman is kidnapped by family or someone else and prevented from access to abortions, those are.extenuating circumstances and the decision in whether or not to destroy her reproductive capability can be delayed until a.decision is made in whether or not she was kidna…
/r/MensRights06/03/17 12:30 PM
1

I am aware some use it to describe a.style but that is improper and should be called something else. It must be animation and if not Japanese.at least from somewhere in the orient of Asia like China or Korea. There is no fixed.anime style. General attributes.predominate but they don't define anime, just its popular image.
/r/MensRights06/03/17 12:25 PM
-4

Suicide is rare to begin with so I do not see a problem with calling it rare. I call gay marriage rare too. What is there more of, gay marriages or female.suicides?
/r/MensRights06/03/17 12:23 PM
-1

Correct. If his girlfriend that made it for him had been Japanese it might've qualified... Except a.shirt is a still image not animated so it still wouldn't be anime. A single cell of an anime isn't anime. Could qualify as manta if it was a comic strip in the shirt. The scantily clad women in the shirt could qualify as toons.
/r/MensRights06/03/17 09:41 AM
2

If you won't sue the post office for gender discrimination then sue the.army for age discrimination? If SS reg is needed for post office work does that mean no women in post office?
/r/MensRights06/03/17 09:39 AM
3

The fight towards gender equality is contingent on women having a CHOICE I wonder if Hannah Cranston could write that and not notice the inherent contradiction. All you really need to do is shift the enunciated word 3 prior.
/r/MensRights06/03/17 09:34 AM
1

Joker was never portrayed in a negative light in a Harley Quinn episode? Bruce was never portrayed in a negative light for getting Barbara pregnant?
/r/MensRights06/03/17 09:30 AM
2

Johnny Bravo is a comedy which parodies stereotypes, might be reading too much into it. One of the glaring absurdities there is Johnny is constantly assaulted by women simply for complimenting them. To the immature watching this is slapstick where a "jerk" gets what he "deserves" for being blunt and forward with the sex you are supposed to tiptoe around. To the sophisticated viewer the hilarity is in the idea that Johnny is portrayed as.the problem so.only because he actively flexes his pecs to …
/r/MensRights06/03/17 09:28 AM
3

You're watching the wrong shows. Daniel Tiger's Neighborhood treats both genders pretty fairly, toots.
/r/MensRights06/03/17 09:22 AM
1

She made the choice to fully develops a fetus she would then abandon. That is an abuse of her reproductive ability. She shirked her obligation to terminate it early in development. Until men get nanobots to self destruct any sperm that exits our body at the daily press of a button there is no equivalent option. You can't shirk an unfulfillable duty.
/r/MensRights06/03/17 09:20 AM
1

I am for default female stewardship of a child. If she will not or can not provide it the government should seize the baby and she should pay child support to the government. The government then needs an employee to raise the kid. Initial consideration should be given to the father or other family members if he doesnt want to. For guys who want a guaranteed kid the option should exist to make a.contract prior to conception to transfer the financial and parental rights of her offspring. This shou…
/r/MensRights06/03/17 09:15 AM
0

Our need to not abandon children outweighs our need to protect the reckless women who created them. Men pay indirectly through taxes if not directly through support. If punitive sterilization doesn't fix the problem then forced abortions would be the next step. If she won't pay for the service, the government should seize her assets and then sterilize her for disobedience.
/r/MensRights06/03/17 09:09 AM
1

We force criminals to do labour like community service. Being a surrogate could be an option we could extend to female criminals criminals.if if need arose in the future.
/r/MensRights06/03/17 09:06 AM
1

Eventually if necessary, but the first step is to allow them to be born and sterilize the mother to prevent repeat behavior. That alone is going to massively improve things and serve as a large deterrent. Perhaps enough that forced abortions would not be necessary to save the nation and the option could be tabled out of kindness as a gesture of largesse.
/r/MensRights06/03/17 09:04 AM
1

The government should, but should then sterilize the mother and take her money. They should get abortions if they don't want to pay. They should use barriers if they don't want abortions. They should abstain if they don't want barriers. It does seem reasonable to split abortion costs in cases of consensual sex. That can be negotiated. Women could feel free to not fuck a guy who lacked an abortionist in retainer for example. While in theory a rapist should pay 100% of abortion fees I am against e…
/r/MensRights06/03/17 09:01 AM
1

Economically forcing women against abortion to pay 100% of the kid's needs is the right thing to do. So is sterilizing them if they fail to meet that obligation.
/r/MensRights06/03/17 08:53 AM
1

If you are a woman, it is your choice to conceive at no point do you slip & fall into parenthood In Soviet Russia, parenthood slips and and falls into you
/r/MensRights06/03/17 08:50 AM
1

You would still have some pumping them out. Problem.is you need to take the kid, sterilize the mom and garnish her wages if she can't support.
/r/MensRights06/03/17 08:47 AM
2

Men are also raped.
/r/MensRights06/03/17 08:45 AM
-1

In some cases women occasionally get raped in rare occasions and conceiving is not their choice. In those cases I don't mind if they want to keep their rape baby if they can financially support it. Women without an arranged nest egg for their kid should be sterilized if they don't abort.
/r/MensRights06/03/17 08:44 AM
0

This is not punishment for existence, but rather for reckless behavior. Sterilizing women who procreate in poverty benefits men by saving resources we would spend to raise the kids in their place and by reducing hoodlum production.
/r/MensRights06/03/17 08:43 AM
1

It is human cells but not a human because it is inadequately distinct. Like calling my foot "a human". I would never say "I stubbed a human!"
/r/MensRights06/03/17 08:40 AM
0

Masters and slaves can in theory make decisions together too. Doesn't mean it is true cooperation though. Unless men have an enforced "no", there is no "yes" worth noting.
/r/MensRights06/03/17 08:39 AM
0

I know with 100% certainty that I, as a man, most certainly DID have a choice Your choice was coerced by the existing system. I do not accept it as valid.
/r/MensRights06/03/17 08:37 AM
0

I would be okay with this if she owes money and can't pay. Indentured servitude Axlotl style.
/r/MensRights06/03/17 08:36 AM
1

MEN CAN'T CONSENT Men cannot presently give acceptable consent to procreate because to have uncoerced consent you must first have the option to say no. Sort of like the argument that a woman sex slave can't consent non-coerced to sex since she is a slave. Only when men are not owing by default with merely the option to opt in can we then ever give proper consent.
/r/MensRights06/03/17 08:34 AM
0

I think most of us here just want the same rights regarding control over whether or not we owe financial responsibilities to a being because our germ cells gt mixed up somewhere.
/r/MensRights06/03/17 08:30 AM
1

Women rape men in undemonstrable ways so no.
/r/MensRights06/03/17 08:29 AM
0

We must control population growth or else the nation collapses. Sterilization will cut down on the amount of fetuses we must kill to accomplish this.
/r/MensRights06/03/17 08:28 AM
3

Murder is for sentients. This is thinning the foetal herd. Save your love for the breathers who are in need of it.
/r/MensRights06/03/17 08:26 AM
3

That is not the truth. Government could pay. Child support is simply to make 1 man pay instead of all men and women together.
/r/MensRights06/03/17 08:24 AM
1

That is an okay option so long as we sterilize women who do this.
/r/MensRights06/03/17 08:23 AM
2

I would like to. Preferably prophylactic birth control as the primary step. If women ignore their responsibility to abort kids they can't care for we should sterilize them to prevent recurrence.
/r/MensRights06/03/17 08:22 AM
3

Were looking a the non-aborted accidental pregnancies, not the sum of accidental pregnancies.
/r/MensRights06/03/17 08:21 AM
1

We already have an extortionate single mom problem. The solution is punitive sterilization not slavery. Chinese kid cap of 1 for the sponges.
/r/MensRights06/03/17 08:19 AM
1

I don't have a problem with women reproducing without permission so long as they can independently support their offspring. If they can't arrange that and the government has to step in, they should be sterilized to prevent repeat behavior of the crime. They should then owe child support to the government. This should never apply to men unless they voluntarily agree to support a child in a contract with the woman. If the woman voids the contract in any way (not his kid, cheats in him, divorces, c…
/r/MensRights06/03/17 08:17 AM
1

<3 Carnage Queen
/r/MensRights06/03/17 08:11 AM
2

Well now I have to watch.
/r/MensRights06/03/17 08:09 AM
-4

Not attempted suicide. Feigned attempted suicide. Genuine suicide attempts by women as rare as genuine expressions of love for men.
/r/MensRights06/03/17 08:08 AM
1

Women aren't incompetent so we should replace "attempt" with "fake attempt where I expect someone to pu.o my stomach in time and coddle me".
/r/MensRights06/03/17 08:07 AM
1

Article writers are prone to stating unproven assumptions. Where is the proof? Did the cabby state she was unconscious?
/r/MensRights06/03/17 08:05 AM
1

People can do a lot of strange things given proper incentive. Like hit themselves and say their husband did it. Or have a fetish for wearing diapers or peeing on a partner. If we are willing to imagine the accused is antisocial enough to commit sexuak assault we should also be willing to imagine the plaintiff is antisocial enough to desecrate a seat without permission. If it.is a case of a girl whose promiscuity is exposed by police disruption, she may figure "if I pee myself they will believe I…
/r/MensRights06/03/17 12:51 AM
1

You can't give consent to non-strangers, sorry. It is always rape because by being someone you know, their importance to you gives them a position if influence over your life, which is a coercing factor in any consent you may wish to give. Embrace the victimhood.
/r/MensRights06/03/17 12:48 AM
1

We can't assume she was unconscious. This is fakeable.
/r/MensRights06/03/17 12:45 AM
2

Nope, no proof she didn't consent to remove her clothes.
/r/MensRights06/03/17 12:43 AM
2

Urine indicates nothing. Not voluntarily responding to shake and shout tests means nothing. 0.24 when? Like with Emily Doe this is probably just a number pulled out of thin air to frame this cabby like they framed Brock.Turner. The number means shit unless we.are.shown the actual % from a blood draw and all math shown to make estimates for prior times. This is not something to take on faith.
/r/MensRights06/03/17 12:41 AM
1

You overlook that people can piss themselves intentionally while 100% sober. This means nothing. Also can the police did not verify this was not ejaculate. That can contain traces of urine.
/r/MensRights05/03/17 08:56 AM
2

What about a fat 26 year old? Need pix of both.
/r/MensRights05/03/17 08:54 AM
3

Wrong. You can consent to sex with a.stranger and then pass out. Also, you can fake being passed out.
/r/MensRights05/03/17 08:53 AM
1

She could have intentionally pissed herself and avoided responding to the shake and shout test to frame the cabbie for rape to protect her reputation and enjoy the fruits of victim culture. Just like Emily Doe in the Brock Turner case, blood estimates are unreliable unless the examiner shares the math they used to make the estimate.
/r/MensRights05/03/17 08:52 AM
2

On the subject of protecting children from paedophiles: this is all good and well but if you have evidence of such activity, hand it over to the police Like a security camera that would get creation/possession/distribution charges?
/r/MensRights05/03/17 07:55 AM
1

Sentencing has a range so they can be customized based on their individual natures. Even if they did get closer to max than whites his would I knw that is sue to racism and not the nature of the individual crimes?
/r/MensRights05/03/17 07:51 AM
1

A stand must be made against anchor babies.
/r/MensRights05/03/17 07:49 AM
3

Being black didn't necessarily make this worse. This has happened to white students who lacked the privilege if being able to play the race card to get people to care about his plight.
/r/MensRights03/03/17 08:45 AM
1

Probably. Doesnt appear to claim rape.anyway. Was talking about the generalization not the OP.
/r/MensRights28/02/17 02:01 AM
1

Who cares if she claimed it was rape? I don't believe her. Roman was going to plead to a reasonable unlawful sex. The thing is with him and Clinton they give them the benefit of the doubt. But if its a man who isn't part of their cabal suddenly its "listen and believe".
/r/MensRights27/02/17 09:06 PM
1

No, not by law, it is not illegal to state affirmation for the consent of a minor, only to act upon the affirmation.
/r/MensRights27/02/17 09:02 PM
1

Underwear serves a role as a hygiene product too. Both briefs and tampons stop leaks from staining pants.
/r/MensRights27/02/17 09:01 PM
9

RoK did a decent point about George Takei. Admittedly a good strategic move by the left since they found a way to alienate Milo from the right even though they don't alienate their own guys who celebrate their relationship an with adults as tweens.
/r/MensRights24/02/17 09:39 AM
2

I don't like the implication that someone is indecent if they affirm a male's consent at 14.
/r/MensRights24/02/17 09:36 AM
1

Why shouldn't non-conformists complain about a frustrating situation?
/r/MensRights24/02/17 09:21 AM
0

If this was part of something that provided entire wardrobes I guess I might be okay with it but only sponsoring one piece of clothing for one gender seems wrong. If they do this then they should have to buy guys free briefs.
/r/MensRights24/02/17 09:16 AM
1

The problem is f you hear someone talked poorly you have to figure if that is truth or a lie meant to divide. Crafty sociopaths also may not necessarily talk poorly about you until after the relationship breaks down, not before it. Men, parroting, I probably do enough of that subconsciously so I'd rather not go out of my way to do it more. Taking the "don't" but lamenting how it results in slim odds, and feeling sore at those with better odds since they naturally conform and do not need to fake.
/r/MensRights23/02/17 10:40 AM
1

I can't say anyone has.absolute trust. There are.levels.of trust we extend. I do so hesitantly, it is conditional to how I think they perceive me and how I do or can affect them. College and grad school are populated by people with more to lose so they may not risk repercussions. You cannot know absolutely that they did not try to ruin you or accuse you of something. That could be done in private. It could be a case where it leads to noting criminal but can still negatively affect reputation and…
/r/MensRights21/02/17 08:34 AM
1

I am not certain any length of interaction could guarantee knowing someone. We know what is presented. They might be polite to a waiter but still betray you. Your advice is good enough for weeding out obvious problems which is what I would do anyway. But it wouldn't feel like enough. I would still fear being thrown under the bus.
/r/MensRights21/02/17 06:56 AM
1

Both genders can plot but women have more opportunities to exploit. If a guy friend has a disagreement we would be treated closer to equally than if we were mixed gender. These factors woukld naturally infuence the actions and risks people take. I don't think all women are crazy. Nor do I think they would all be exploitive and unfair. But it seems common enough that there is a deterring risk of it in relationships.
/r/MensRights20/02/17 09:53 AM
1

I am an odd person so I don't discriminate against odd behavior. I find normal behavior unattractive. So this is possibly more of a dilemma for me than others.
/r/MensRights20/02/17 09:22 AM
1

I do not know. It is possible. I think we all try to learn that assessment but I recognize that I could be a bad judge of character and think bad people are good or good people are bad. I think precautions should be taken as if they are bad.
/r/MensRights20/02/17 09:21 AM
4

In mostncases the woman would not have focused on a career anyway.
/r/MensRights14/02/17 12:30 PM
1

We need more judges lime this.
/r/MensRights14/02/17 12:29 PM
1

Lecturing people on being selective isn't a solution. Frequently that comes into effect when they select not to be with an exploitive woman after having already invested a lot of time in her.
/r/MensRights14/02/17 12:28 PM
1

I don't personally hang around anyone. But psychopaths can feign empathy and morality until it isn't convenient. Why do you persist in victim blaming? We aren't mind readers.
/r/MensRights14/02/17 12:27 PM
1

Wikipedia is shit in stuff like this, massive POV pushing and feminist white knighting. I can not respond to a shake/shout test for 48 hours if properly motivated. Doesn't prove anything. The estimates mean nothing if they will not release the math behind them for review. Doe drank in a full stomach which slows down alcohol metabolism. Her blood was orobablynat its highest concentration when they tested it hours later and then artificially inflated assuming it has dropped from some higher earlie…
/r/MensRights14/02/17 12:25 PM
2

It isn't psychopathy, simply apathy and self-interest. If they do immoral acts in defense they are not going out of their way to stir things up. Nor need they even dislike the men they sacrifice. It may be a case of "I really like this boy and want to keep fucking him and don't want to hurt him... but I don't want my boyfriend/dad/husband/mom to hate/disown me for cheating/smuttiness... so I will say it was rape. Its okay, men are strong.... They are more privileged than me and can bounce back b…
/r/MensRights13/02/17 05:45 AM
2

What are we disagreeing on then? Where the line between reaonable caution and delusional paranoia is drawn?
/r/MensRights13/02/17 05:40 AM
1

I am not discounting them as people. They have biological differences and different cultures. Having much in common doesn't mean we should discount this. Men act out ofnsekf interest and throw each other under the bus too. Women are the sake in this. The difference is women have more options for doing it, more support. The common tendency of characterizing men as ONLY wanting to sleep with them instead of ALSO wanting to sleep with them makes men sound like another species and doesn't treat us l…
/r/MensRights13/02/17 05:39 AM
4

Very broad definition of crazy there. Have some experience being burned but moreso in observing it happening to others. Everyone calculates. I do not believe those who throw men under the bus think of themselves as monsters for doing it. Girls being nice to you doesn't prove anything. That can do ,180 on right circumstances. Toxic attitudes exist in society which women simply exploit out of selfishness if the need arises. It is not villainous, they are simply defending themselves with human shie…
/r/MensRights13/02/17 05:20 AM
2

Perhaps. Can't evaluate lots without being able to verify the number of nice. We can't all detect toxic if they are skilled enough.masqueraders.
/r/MensRights13/02/17 05:16 AM
2

We take precautions against murder all the time so why not rape? Ever locked a door?
/r/MensRights13/02/17 05:15 AM
1

I guess I ought to spend time helping this guy too and not just Brock Turnerm
/r/MensRights13/02/17 04:48 AM
3

The vast majority of people are not murdered. Not seeing your point.
/r/MensRights13/02/17 04:44 AM
3

Women don't have to be out to get you t do you harm. They may simply get you if it is convenient for them. For example: they will file false rape accusations if their sexual choices are discovered to manipulate how others react to the discovery. They may start out with neutral intent but are often apathetic to the fate of men they use, and will put their own convenience ahead of danger to him.
/r/MensRights13/02/17 04:43 AM
4

Please stop blaming problems on *"crazy" women. They.are not the only problem and probably not even the main problem Women are often reasonable and use that to exploit and use men by utilizing crazy women and men. Emily Doe for example wasn't crazy, just crazy horny for hot teen swimmers who were drunk enough for her to take advantage of. Brock Turner stuck his finger in a calculating predator who then swooned when her alleyway antics were discovered to written him as a villain in her story so h…
/r/MensRights13/02/17 04:40 AM
-1

Brock Turner is a great example. Even when you tend to her needs she will still play dead fish if anyone spots her cheating on her boyfriend and claim to remember nothing to send you to jail. I am not attached to long courtship or public declarations of affection but that seems like it would be safer. Women do not deserve hookup culture anymore and men shouldn't let horniness suck them into it.
/r/MensRights13/02/17 04:37 AM
2

Better late than.never.
/r/MensRights13/02/17 04:34 AM
1

There is doubt. Characters are made up. Depictions of characters are not depictions of children because characters are not real and you need to be real to be a child. Actual evidence to justify spending resources? Clearly not. Look at most rape cases. Often no evidence at all it wasn't consensual If testimony is all that is necessary then someone can testify they saw me shooting Mickey Mouse.
/r/MensRights13/02/17 04:33 AM
1

Even if it didn't work right away it should work eventually and then get the previous overturned.
/r/MensRights13/02/17 04:30 AM
2

http://www.anime-planet.com/images/manga/covers/lolicon-phoenix-4132.jpg
/r/MensRights13/02/17 04:30 AM
1

Which is a problem I would rather deal with by pointingout he is not a rapist. Not by inaccurately calling women who give handjobs without consent rapists.
/r/MensRights13/02/17 04:27 AM
1

Would it? Lack of sexual access makes people frustrated and easier to manipulate. If it were in the open it could be better monitored and regulated. Predators want isolation. Permissiveness would ruin their chase.
/r/MensRights13/02/17 04:24 AM
1

Not sure why you linked that. This is what I am presently talking about. A jury did not convict Handley. He took a plea bargain. He did not plead innocent and last out the case. A prosecutor could theoretically charge me with murdering Mickey Mouse and I could plead guilty to it and be convicted. Doing so doesn't set precedent that you are likely to get guilty verdicts from juries for killing toons.
/r/MensRights12/02/17 07:59 AM
1

Or non-commercial. No face booking for.social status! I'm against family photos too. That just encourages parents to focus in how a kid was better/cuter before and neglect them in present day. The only photos that should be allowed should be for government ID if they get lost.
/r/MensRights12/02/17 07:56 AM
1

You need a unanimous verdict. He would just need one person open to believing in the importance of free speech who recognized nobody was harmed by the production of the media. One problem with jury is if they don't do anon ballots and have to vote openly people could bully a holdout.
/r/MensRights12/02/17 07:54 AM
1

I'm not sure helping women and boys hook up is a NAMBLA priority.
/r/MensRights12/02/17 07:51 AM
1

The likelihood of brag.v.report depends on his hit she was.
/r/MensRights12/02/17 07:50 AM
1

The problem is a false dichotomy of all or nothing approaches. We can advocate punishment without playing into moral hysterics which got overly punitive sentencing in place to start.
/r/MensRights12/02/17 07:49 AM
1

Unlawful sex shouldn't be called rape. There is such.a thing as less informed consent.
/r/MensRights12/02/17 07:47 AM
2

Teenagers are pubescent. There is no indication at all of pedophilia. Talk to me when she is stripping for 12 year olds. Punishing her is just to make a point because men doing sexy stuff with teen girls gets punishment. Not because this is seriously any harm
/r/MensRights12/02/17 07:46 AM
1

The problem with that example is Handley was.convicted as the result of pleading guilty in accordance with a plea bargain. It doesn't tell us what might happen if it stood the test of a competent trial. CBLDF were hungry for a fight but never got it due to the plea.
/r/MensRights12/02/17 05:32 AM
1

MFW this thread is not the first time I saw someone post this exact drawing in the web. Not many channers here who tried spans of /b/ lurking I take it?' Stuff like this got posted for shock value by trolls to try and derail discussion threads pretty regularly.
/r/MensRights12/02/17 05:29 AM
1

If that were true why would they remove loli?
/r/MensRights12/02/17 05:24 AM
1

The query might be more "what order". If it didn't risk being classed as porn I would want to take a photo as evidence. Otherwise she could escape and eliminate evidence and probably avoid conviction. If they found her skin cells on his dick, odds are her lawyer argues that you fingered her and then jacked him off and that is how they got there. Suddenly the father is facing 2 assault charges while she goes home free.
/r/MensRights12/02/17 05:23 AM
1

He could go to jail if charges lead him to accept a plea bargain. I don't know if anyone has actually fought the charges and still been convicted by a jury solely for an illustration in America.
/r/MensRights12/02/17 05:20 AM
1

If children cannot consent to having their privacy invaded by pictures why is it legal to photograph them to market merchandise?
/r/MensRights12/02/17 05:18 AM
0

Saying "could only imagine " implies it wouldn't be feasible. Internet is littered with lolicon manga though.
/r/MensRights12/02/17 05:17 AM
-1

These are fictional characters not real people. I personallt have no problem with Facebook allowing this. More so with the hypocrisy in that if you flipped the genders and showed a girl engaging in sexual acts against a receptive man they would take it down in an instant.
/r/MensRights12/02/17 05:15 AM
1

Real men don't tell other men to pay them respect. Better?
/r/MensRights12/02/17 05:12 AM
1

Can you account for the location of your semen all 366 days of your eleventh year?
/r/MensRights09/02/17 06:47 AM
1

Actually its about 20% better.
/r/MensRights09/02/17 06:36 AM
1

Can we quit the bullshit "real man" /"real woman" thing? What skin is it off your back if a murderess suicides? Saves resources.
/r/MensRights09/02/17 06:34 AM
4

The irony is this derision is targeted at men who are aware of and consent to their exploitation. Birds who raised cuckoo hatchlings were not aware.
/r/MensRights08/02/17 06:32 AM
2

They should call it "remove controversial" Sub's that inspire some hatred like MR or KIA are more popular, not less, due to their hatred. They are the "controversial threads" option for communitiez.
/r/MensRights08/02/17 06:30 AM
1

Is it possible they are calculating popularity by something other than account subs, like posting or voting or viewing activity?
/r/MensRights08/02/17 06:28 AM
1

That relies too much in first hand analysis. Humans are adaptive. Actual physical studies showing nerve response break the tie. We argue a false dichotomy anyway. Those who got circumcisions later enough in life tontell the difference probably got very conservative ones because the adult size allows more accurate cuts.
/r/MensRights08/02/17 06:03 AM
1

Wouldn't be the first issue where disagreeors get shamed.
/r/MensRights08/02/17 06:01 AM
2

I don't know what the policies of /r/pokemon would be. Maybe pokemon communities you know are adults only and not averse to discussing genitalia like art groups of furry fans would be a place to start.
/r/MensRights08/02/17 06:00 AM
1

It isn't actually a discrete thing. The skin is continuous with no clear dividing line. You could have just enough cut off that it doesn't cover the glans but still has a sliding action for the shaft. More is removed for others and they lose that.
/r/MensRights08/02/17 05:59 AM
1

It means having all the parts in the blueprint. For example if I lost a pinky or ring finger I could still have a working hand and do a lot of the same stuff but t wouldn't be complete.
/r/MensRights08/02/17 05:57 AM
3

MFW foreskin bacterial infections that led to widespread circumcision were the result of Victorian germophobe mothers so obsessed with scrubbing every inch of their infant sons' dicks that they forced the head out before its time.
/r/MensRights07/02/17 10:27 AM
2

Perhaps you had only a minor amount of skin removed compared to most circumcisions.
/r/MensRights07/02/17 10:24 AM
2

More functional than an earlobe. An eyelid or lip would be a closer analogy.
/r/MensRights07/02/17 10:22 AM
1

Fabric assumes circumcised male.not living in nudist colony.
/r/MensRights07/02/17 10:21 AM
2

Speaking on behalf of your kid, solid parent here.
/r/MensRights07/02/17 10:19 AM
1

I have never seen ruined. I would protest if I did. Overused word. Look at what rape feminists do with it. Ruin is only utter destruction. Hell even when it gets chopped off it isn't necessarily ruined. Bobbitt bounced back. Garbage disposal guy's got ruined. That is my mi imum requirement.
/r/MensRights07/02/17 10:18 AM
2

We do not shame the cut, but rather those who embrace that violation. I am cut as a baby and have never felt persecuted here.
/r/MensRights07/02/17 10:16 AM
2

Why would the head get bigger?
/r/MensRights07/02/17 10:15 AM
1

Is that good because it gets you more women? If we amputated clitoral hoods, clitorises would be less sensitive and it would be harder for women to orgasm rubbing them. This would increase reliance in vaginal penetration since that stimulates the deep roots of the clitoris which retain their sensitivity. So if circumcising babies is good so men get more sexuak access, we should circumcise baby girls too.
/r/MensRights07/02/17 10:13 AM
1

Circumcised dicks cannot work perfectly. They are imperfect. All lack the sliding ability the foreskin endows.
/r/MensRights07/02/17 10:09 AM
1

Not as a rule. I believe I am a victim of mutilation and still get erections.
/r/MensRights07/02/17 10:09 AM
2

Do we need studies to show people born without a sense of taste miss out on a part of life by being denied the sensory exoeriencd? Would we need a study to prove that having your nipples cut off at birth would make your life less happy? Always perplexed when studies are demanded for what seems obvious.
/r/MensRights07/02/17 10:08 AM
1

First they came for the goyim circumcisors and nobody protested. Then they came for the meziza b'peh and there was nobody to speak up.
/r/MensRights07/02/17 10:05 AM
2

Are there.any laws against secretly audio or video recording what your teacher says and putting it on YouTube?
/r/MensRights07/02/17 10:03 AM
1

I am not promoting abstinence only sex ed though. Still teach them about safe sex, but still have it be illegal as a deterrent. Sex with teens is already partially banned. It for some reason is legal with other teens who can't be trusted to make wise decisions like screening for STDs. If it is banned with people who should be able to add their experience to make things safer then it should be banned with those who can't. If teen-on-teen sex is harmless enough not to punish, it proves sex isn't a…
/r/MensRights07/02/17 09:59 AM
3

This is amazing. I am legit marking out over this. You have no idea what you have stumbled onto. You need to give this to the activist gamer groups which have been created recently.
/r/MensRights07/02/17 09:40 AM
1

I said "not all". I understand many teens fight. I believe most avoid it though. Whether or not you believe in juvie as crime prevention is a separate discussion. I can say personally that fear of the law kept me from doing criminal acts as a kid. School shooters are a small minority. There are more adult shooters, does that mean we should not jail adult shooters because they will do so anyway? Whatever minority commit crime in spite of deterrent, more will do so if we lack deterrants. Adults so…
/r/MensRights05/02/17 08:00 AM
1

Witness testimony is a form of evidence, even if it is testimony from the accused. I understand your reasons for not considering one witness' statement to be the penultimate of reliability and hope you understand why similar reservations can be had about the others. Both parties had raised alcohol levels. Interesting you only mention hers. She is the one who had a meal before going to the party which would have slows alcohol absorption, keeping her less drunk earlier in the night when they hooke…
/r/MensRights05/02/17 07:55 AM
2

A big enough fuss needs to be made where they do it to save face. Otherwise in house loyalty wins out unless you get lucky and boss already hates him.
/r/MensRights04/02/17 06:13 AM
1

Part of it is tone or if it is orceived empathy or insult.
/r/MensRights04/02/17 06:06 AM
2

Fat men have a somewhat easier time finding dates than fat women He havin' a laugh
/r/MensRights04/02/17 06:03 AM
1

She probably floated for a couple hours and got carried by the current.
/r/MensRights04/02/17 06:02 AM
1

I accept the people but not the excess adipose hindering them. I would like to help them access a lat pulldown.
/r/MensRights04/02/17 06:01 AM
1

This is of course the sole instance of the suffix phobia being misused to describe disgust instead of fear.
/r/MensRights04/02/17 06:00 AM
1

Unfortunately one-sided in that it is only the right to procreate with a spouse but not the right to avoid procreating with anyone who gets your sperm.
/r/MensRights04/02/17 05:49 AM
1

I think abortion is awesome and abhor depriving innocent women of choice. The majority of women are guilty though, of turning a blind eye to male enslavement. When the hypocrites get around to knighting for us I will return to knighting for them. If they do not want to procreate then they should do all in their power to avoid sex like a man must.
/r/MensRights04/02/17 05:48 AM
2

Sometimes you need to take a step back before taking two forward. I believe it is progress to remove the unique privilege women enjoy. It should be held hostage until they unite with us to advocate for all enjoying choice together.
/r/MensRights04/02/17 05:46 AM
1

Good. Normally I would be against this type of thing but I believe depriving women of choice will instigate empathy for the choices men have been deprived of. I will gladly try to get their freedom back if they will back a "freedom for all" instead of "freedom for us" approach.
/r/MensRights04/02/17 05:44 AM
1

Most teens can process consequence and avoid committing crimes. That is why they are not all stealing cars and attacking people. The ones with impulse control issues over sex are likely to become rapists or other kinds of criminals anyway. Not a major loss to have them in the system. "We can only teach and hope" simply is not true. That is why juvie exists to begin with. Punishment disincentivizes.
/r/MensRights04/02/17 05:41 AM
1

We err in using this initialisms since it is a major company. While BGM is background music. Maybe IGM? NGM?
/r/MensRights04/02/17 05:38 AM
3

I think the wage gap is real but inverse of what feminists preach. Women get paid more to do less. If men make more in spite of that it is be because they do so much more to compensate for it.
/r/MensRights04/02/17 05:36 AM
1

As someone who is up to date on Blackstone I am only just now realizing that only dealt with missing girls.
/r/MensRights04/02/17 05:33 AM
1

Brock testified he received permission. Emily says she can't remember. There is no evidence she was blackout drunk. She had a boyfriend and a reputation to protect. That is incentive to lie. The paramedic report showed she miraculously stopped being "blackout" when he pinched her finger, and then she vomited without assistance. All signs point to faker.
/r/MensRights04/02/17 05:29 AM
1

It is a legitimate observation. Not sure I was using it to argue anything. Why not bring it up? Elephant in the room. People are quicker to condemn services if men exploit them and slower to if only women are.
/r/MensRights04/02/17 05:26 AM
1

Some will still do it, and then prison will stop it. But punishment will reduce it. If sex ed and health class is a solution then we should not be policing who they do it with. Clearly punishing adult partners does not stop teens from engaging in dangerous acts since they just do it to one another, so you must punish them instead.
/r/MensRights04/02/17 05:24 AM
1

You say "he was convicted" as if its supposed to be convincing here. Assault is a big deal. I don't think Brock Turner assaulted Emily Doe. I believe two men assaulted him. The Swedish cyclists' testimony did not contain anything that convinced me they broke up an assault. It was dark and loud and they could have missed cues of consent. I believe they jumped the gun and assumed the worst and then covered theirnasses because they would go to jail unless their attack was justified as stopping a cr…
/r/MensRights04/02/17 05:22 AM
1

I amnaware of the reference but while some states treat them differently I am not t convinced there is universal distinction. Particularly in places where the misnomer "statutory rape" exists. Where consented-to statutory situations are called "unlawful sex" the distinction exists but I don't believe all places do that. It seems like some don't bother to discern. I think some don't bother to assess the potential presence of consent they wikk ignore in the end.
/r/MensRights04/02/17 05:15 AM
1

In that case how did they figure out she faked the call? Confusing. I would say "information given by the caller" since adult role players call this number too.
/r/MensRights04/02/17 05:12 AM
1

how is this ridiculous? Men could not normally engage in a similar tactic due to lower voices. You know this.
/r/MensRights02/02/17 05:29 PM
1

I don't get his first amendment would protect the ability to accuse someone e of a crime they did notxommit.
/r/MensRights02/02/17 04:52 PM
0

Yes they should both be charged, for their own protection, since they are both in danger from the sex.
/r/MensRights02/02/17 04:28 PM
1

As open as I am to compromise, we will get that anyway by people taking a middle path between what is now and what is advocated so we may as well bid high and be idealists.
/r/MensRights02/02/17 04:27 PM
1

I know of You probably know more men than women. Women would similarly know of more cheating by other women by having more observation if their intimate details.
/r/MensRights02/02/17 04:26 PM
1

Bullshit. Brock was younger and drunker and received consent to finger her. He is only guilty of being drunk in public. Emily Doe in the other hand: drunk in public public urination furnishing alcohol to a minor indecent exposure withholding evidence from police false rape accusation accessory to assault
/r/MensRights02/02/17 04:22 PM
1

200 hours of community service per month for 25 years would be fine with me. I am okay with not jailing her so long as shenis banned from using telephones and computers, she should only be jailed if she breaks either in restriction or does not fulfill her monthly labour quota. Proceeds of labour go to the man, to prevent government bias.
/r/MensRights02/02/17 04:15 PM
1

Brock Turner did not assault Emily Doe. She assaulted him. The Stanford Swimmer casenwas a travesty of justice. His light sentence was the judge trying to diminish the impact if utter miscarriage of justice by the jury. Guys occasionally don't puss out and sell out the innocent for convenience, and the judge suffered threats as a result of his high moral character. It was also far less serious. Even if Emily had been fingered without consent, that is far less upsetting than having people think y…
/r/MensRights02/02/17 04:13 PM
1

Falsely accusing a man of rape would not be judged as making her a danger to children so they would still let her teach. If anyone has evidence of a woman getting fired from being a teacher for making a false rape accusation feel free to contradict me.
/r/MensRights02/02/17 04:08 PM
1

Her reputation will barely suffer. She will make some off the record sob story about how she saw a kid getting molested by thisnguy and thought there was a better chance if him getting punished if she acted as the girl's voice. Many will lap this up. She will be a local hero.
/r/MensRights02/02/17 04:06 PM
1

Execution destroys life. Life sentences just restrict it.
/r/MensRights02/02/17 04:04 PM
1

Not being a direct danger I would be okaynbanning her from using all communication devices for a decade and making her an indentured servant who must provide free labour to the government which then pays the salary to the wronged man.
/r/MensRights02/02/17 04:03 PM
1

No idea how people can miss this, 30something women pretending to be teen girls on the phone was the premise for Chrs Hansen To Catch a Predator. My guess is the women who did this as a hobby moved on to making fake ChildLine calls once men on the web wised up and increasingly demanded can verification of identity and most of them could not create visual illusion to match the auditory.
/r/MensRights02/02/17 03:59 PM
1

I am.willing to forgoe imorisonment if she gets throat surgery to make her voice sound like a man so that she can never fake the voice of a child ever again. Anyone agree?
/r/MensRights02/02/17 03:57 PM
1

That should be mandatory. That way ChildLine can given advice but not be a crime reporting service. They can inform kids of how to r3port the crime but they should have to do that directly not using CL as an intermediate. CL is obviously deceiving children by reporting if acting under the pretense of protecting their privacy. Now that newspapers are reporting in this it will disincentivize actuK victims from using the service. This means the majority of reports from CL will be fake ones. Actual …
/r/MensRights02/02/17 03:53 PM
1

It gives them grounds to stomp in your life and plant seeds in peoples minds. Access to your home to plant evidence.
/r/MensRights02/02/17 03:48 PM
1

Being able to be anonymously falsely accused is a deterrent for me to go out and collect my mail from a community box if there are children playing by it. Which deterrent wins?
/r/MensRights02/02/17 03:47 PM
1

You are speaking as if a rape accusation has to come from the alleged victim. In a custody dispute one parent can anonymously report they saw the other parent stick their hand down the front of their child's pants in a park. Or a neighbour could do it because they dislike the smell of barbecue.
/r/MensRights02/02/17 03:43 PM
1

If it is going to lead to police reports then it should be run by the police directly.
/r/MensRights02/02/17 03:40 PM
1

It's not some sort of anonymous tip service for the police where I can call up and go "this guy is a diddler!". It is WORSE. With an actual tipline it is easier to track down who made the call and tell if it is fake by listening to the tape. Child line insulates liars by conveying it to police indirectly. It also primarily helps women liars because they can more easily fake the voice if a child.
/r/MensRights02/02/17 03:39 PM
1

Why can't Childline record the number the calk came from and pass it on to authorities?
/r/MensRights02/02/17 03:34 PM
1

Double the penalties until we can replicate the social ostracization.
/r/MensRights02/02/17 03:32 PM
1

We should legally mandate that if press report one they must report th other or face criminal penalties. If press want to shown discretion with victims fine, they must show it with accused too.
/r/MensRights02/02/17 03:30 PM
1

Not just as long..LONGER.
/r/MensRights02/02/17 03:28 PM
1

Anonymously though, because a man accusing a woman if pedophilia will be the first to be targeted as being one while endowing that woman with immunity from accusation the ret of her life.
/r/MensRights02/02/17 03:27 PM
1

Greater weight. To account in the unaccountable penalties a accused suffer which accusers never will. 10 years of "what are you in for?" "They said I raped my daughter. I an innocent" Is not in any way the same as 10 years of: "What are you in for?" "I said my husband raped not daughter and they said I lied. I am innocent" Which decade is more dangerous to live? Which will make it harder to get jobs or socialize or live without rearm when you are free? In recognition of these intangibles the pen…
/r/MensRights02/02/17 03:26 PM
3

Perhaps part of the problem is cops are not usually penalized for being tactful. They can get a kick out disrupting a man's life since they are just "following up leads". Funny the names ofnken make it into newspapers before conviction, maybe even before charges get pressed, in these situations.
/r/MensRights02/02/17 03:20 PM
1

People who make those accusations are well aware of the idiots making judgments. They are accessories to any subsequent crimes so we should preemptively be more punitive.
/r/MensRights02/02/17 03:17 PM
1

I would not conflate crimes of negligence like not signaling a turn with crimes of malice like false accusals.
/r/MensRights02/02/17 03:16 PM
1

Do you mean falsely accusing someone of molestation and being a molester? Pedophilia is the distressing fixation on prepubescents and doesn't deserve punishment, any harm it may lead them to cause is what should be punished.
/r/MensRights02/02/17 03:15 PM
1

Unless by "it" you mean average upper body strength or height I will disagree with you. Women have pretty much everything else better.
/r/MensRights02/02/17 03:11 PM
1

We should preemptively cut off our hands and film it as proof we could not have groped a female at any date afterward. It is the only way.
/r/MensRights02/02/17 03:09 PM
1

You are wrong. That is unfair. Getting 2x is closer to fair.
/r/MensRights02/02/17 03:08 PM
1

It isn't fair. The sentence should be higher. Double is simplest. Even with murder where an exonerated (due to person bsng alive) accused is socially unoersecuted, a difference exists that in concocting a crime intended for persecution, someone framing for murder is intentionaly burdening the legal system. At least real murderers usually try to cover it up and hide the body, to have it written off as runaway or something. Or confess to it and minimize bereaucratic strain. Framers are trying to g…
/r/MensRights02/02/17 03:07 PM
2

I agree about nothing less but disagree with same. In addition tonany sentencing, men accused ( much less charged or convicted) of sex crimes face social penalties women will never suffer. Due to that, for true fairness she should have double the penalties. She should also have to work in prison to be able to eat, otherwise let her starve.
/r/MensRights02/02/17 03:01 PM
1

Which is a problem because she could simply do this out of selfishness or maliciousness and not necessarily paranoid fantasies that she is saving girls.
/r/MensRights02/02/17 02:58 PM
1

You two don't appear to weigh the possibility this is something she may do to people who slight her or to remove career rivals or critics.
/r/MensRights02/02/17 02:57 PM
1

I am all for indentured servitude as an alternate punishment but that doesn't seem popular.
/r/MensRights02/02/17 02:56 PM
1

The problem there is with variable sentencing you could only guarantee equality if someone is already sentenced. Otherwise the minimum sentence would always be chosen even if a man woukdnhave gotten sentenced higher. Instead the policy should be double the maximum sentence of the crime.
/r/MensRights02/02/17 02:53 PM
3

I disagree. Same is unfair. False accusations of rape should carry heavier penalties, perhaps double, than actual rape. It is harder to live as an accused rapist than as an actual rape victim. I would be interested in seeing suicide studies in relation to this.
/r/MensRights02/02/17 02:51 PM
1

I'm all for women's rights too. I mean there are plenty of asshole guys out their that treat women like dog shit, cheat on them Depends on the statistical requirements one outs on plenty. I could say there are plenty of furryfans in America but they still probably comprise a minority of the population. I believe that women treat men like dogshit more often than vice versa. I believe women cheat more often than men do. If it appears different that is just because they are craftier at hiding their…
/r/MensRights02/02/17 02:47 PM
2

Hugging minors at all, lol, not jaded enough. That is something only women can risk doing now. Which naturally leads to women being loved more as the nurturing caregiver so that children will take their side in any dispute. Including supporting false accusations of domestic abuse which can get women off of murder charges. This is why nobody should date moms, you must be their complete submissive puppet or they can just kill you in cold blood.
/r/MensRights02/02/17 02:44 PM
1

note that a minor can consent with someone who is close enough in age, indicating that consent is possible. Minors can consent with anybody. What should be weighed is informedness and mental stability at the time in relation to the act and its risks. You can get an std from a minor as well as an adult so I don't see why we should treat sex with I the minors as a lesser crime when it holds equal dangers.
/r/MensRights02/02/17 02:41 PM
2

Kinda funny you are looking at power in respect to attractiveness and not the glaring fact that a minor can leverage revealing their relationship to coerce the adult into pretty much anything. Even without a minor actively doing that, a pressure exists for an adult to cave to a minor's whims because society advertises the victim complex and the slightest dissatisfaction could lead to exposure of the affair. It is similar to how children rely on parents and would not want to risk displeasing a fa…
/r/MensRights02/02/17 02:38 PM
1

Most likely this individual is in a position of power over that minor like a teacher I doubt there is any evidence to support this assumption. Or, they're an adult and this person is a minor. You already established that by stating the ages of the parties. adults always have the power in a relationship with a minor That simply is not true. Being an adult gives no privilege in respect to minors except the right to vote, which is a power imbalance applied very indirectly. Certain adults in positio…
/r/MensRights02/02/17 02:27 PM
1

Age of other party should not matter. If a 16 year old can't consent to a 28 year old then she can't consent to an 18 year old or an 8 year old either.
/r/MensRights02/02/17 02:20 PM
1

Minors can consent. It just isn't legally valid consent. Consent is not considered legally valid if given under duress or coercion or misinformation or mental instability and consent from minors is considered some mix of the last two.
/r/MensRights02/02/17 02:19 PM
1

You seem to imply the court treats rape f minors and willing sex with minors differently. I dont think it does.
/r/MensRights02/02/17 02:17 PM
1

This is why I will never date single moms. Or anyone who babysits or has younger sis <18 just too much risk. Bad enough to worry about false rape accusations from a scorned woman without that on top.
/r/MensRights02/02/17 02:16 PM
1

This is probably the case for punishing people for framing innocents of crime in general. If we look at the worst crime though, murder, faking your death to pin a murder on someone (I remember some movie with that plot) is usually worse if the deception is uncovered (not always, for some reason alleged sex crimes sometimes get longer sentences than real assaults) I posit that false rape accusations are potentially worse because of their effects even when a not guilty results. If a murder victim …
/r/MensRights02/02/17 02:13 PM
1

http://articles.orlandosentinel.com/1994-12-17/news/9412170296_1_pms-husband-suffering Found this pretty easily. Jan Painter killed her husband Jim in 1994 with a knife and was found not guilty because of PMS.
/r/MensRights02/02/17 01:53 PM
1

I don't agree. While mental illness is considered for both genders, it or any other excuse will more often b used to prevent punishment for women.
/r/MensRights02/02/17 01:46 PM
1

sentenced to 11 weeks prison suspended for two years. She was tagged and given an overnight curfew for a month as well as a 12 month supervision order. 11 weeks prison is over 2 months. Why does the title say "no jail time"? Inadequate slap on the wrist sure BT not nothing. I don't understand suspended for two years though. Does that mean she doesn't serve the prison sentence for two years or did reporter forget q comma and the suspension is to her teaching career? Someone who does this should n…
/r/MensRights02/02/17 01:42 PM
4

discrimination against females cannot fully be addressed without attending to all forms of sexism Mandatory reframing of concern to how it affects women so people will care. I indirect influence on women matters more than direct I fluence.against men.
/r/MensRights02/02/17 06:15 AM
1

Some do so not never, but I would say rarely, less often.
/r/MensRights02/02/17 06:14 AM
2

Probably only gender segregated can be that way. Even then still not a guarantee.
/r/MensRights02/02/17 06:13 AM
2

The weird thing is, this constant onslaught of shit actually makes rape seem less outrageous. It makes me hate rapists less. I could see how when men are shit on like this as if we lack scruples they snap and act like the villains they're.being treated as. I guess same empathy should extend to racial minorities and other crime... Not as much though because that treatment isnt state endorsed.
/r/MensRights02/02/17 06:12 AM
0

People love to throw "child porn" around for shock value. A 15 year old girl is only called a child when puritans want to demonize someone. Let me guess: she sent him a pic of her tits so he is guilty of possession? This bullshit is why no type of porn should be illegal. If sex is illegal you don't need to outlaw evidence of it too. If they want rapists put away longer they should just extend sentence length not trump up media charges to hide what they are doing under sums so it cant be easily c…
/r/MensRights02/02/17 06:04 AM
1

Not sure that is the same since cooking is traditionally female while door opening is traditionally male.
/r/MensRights02/02/17 05:51 AM
2

I think a lunch is justified if someone headbutts you.
/r/MensRights31/01/17 11:15 AM
1

Yeah it just shows they will flip flop to criticize anything. Imagine how if Melania opened the door for Trump they would call her servile or calk him a pussy, even though doing that is just egalitarian.
/r/MensRights31/01/17 10:59 AM
1

Wouldn't this also apply to spoons?
/r/MensRights31/01/17 10:43 AM
10

I bet the 4x is because men are straight forward with killing and get caught more often. Women do it coldblooded with poison or using male proxies so.the murder isnt attributed to them. Men are murdered more. Odds are female parties are behind it just as if not more often then male patterns are.behind female murders.
/r/MensRights29/01/17 09:40 AM
1

I get the "make up for it" mindset..constant rollercoaster.
/r/MensRights29/01/17 09:38 AM
3

I wonder why that example comes up so much. Do we fixate on length? Even a.shorter imement like a drumstick would still b uncomfortable deep.
/r/MensRights29/01/17 09:37 AM
1

It may not be a recent capture but her buried history certainly caught up with her.
/r/MensRights29/01/17 09:33 AM
1

Pretty much. Safe.to say <1% of reporters initiate their own investigations. Most repackage others work. Maybe.~2% bother with independent verification if were lucky.
/r/MensRights29/01/17 09:31 AM
1

Not just the singling out of women, but of parents. Why should someone with kids be considered more trustworthy? Aren't the majority of abusers caregivers?
/r/MensRights29/01/17 09:30 AM
1

There are religious people who don't want to pay for vaccines too. Or non parents who don't want to pay for school. I don't want to pay for fatties' lipo when my country covers that but not dental. Always gonna be some disagreement. If prostitutes cant get people to want them they are failing and the governemet should fire them. STDs would not increase if you made protection mandatory. May even be less promiscuity if people stick to a favorite worker.
/r/MensRights28/01/17 07:18 AM
1

Would she have to prove it? Everyone needs a first chance. If a gay artist were banned from akk cons and never sold that doesn't mean they couldn't have feasibly done so.
/r/MensRights28/01/17 07:15 AM
1

I archive anything I cite in Wikipedia for both reasons. Only makes sense. To the point where I think archive.org might be blocking me sometimes.
/r/MensRights28/01/17 07:13 AM
1

Feminists are not interested in reducing rape. They rely in it as a propaganda tool. Their leaders will hamper any effort to reduce rape unless it comes with huge side benefits like increasing power or decreasing sex altogether.
/r/MensRights31/12/16 07:25 AM
1

Sex isn't air. It is similar to paying a masseur. Some people enjoy giving massages and do it for free but others would not unless paid.
/r/MensRights31/12/16 07:22 AM
1

We probably offer it more often or are more potentially receptive to it if I were to hazard a guess.
/r/MensRights31/12/16 07:21 AM
1

That sounds like people who want to outlaw abortions just for doctors but not for women. Takes two to tango. Trump knows.
/r/MensRights31/12/16 07:20 AM
1

It is illegal to not rent houses to hairdressers?
/r/MensRights31/12/16 07:18 AM
1

If we had sex robots and social medicine I could see viewing it that way.
/r/MensRights31/12/16 07:17 AM
1

Equality would consist of women offering the average man sex freely and frequently This seems to assume they desire it as much. Not sure about that.
/r/MensRights31/12/16 07:16 AM
1

When was this proven a failure? That has never been attempted.
/r/MensRights31/12/16 07:14 AM
1

Starvation is a gun. We can collectively advocate for a better playing field with better choices
/r/MensRights31/12/16 07:13 AM
1

Government hired sex distributors would not be exploitive. It would be a fantastic idea.
/r/MensRights31/12/16 07:12 AM
1

Willingness may not be enough. There should be no coercion and both parties should be fully informed. Turkey rolls should be free. But demand outstrips the supply of those who wish to produce them freely. So we must accept that some want compensation.
/r/MensRights31/12/16 07:11 AM
1

If you want an archive, copy url is easy
/r/MensRights31/12/16 07:05 AM
1

Harm reputation enough and threats are not needed. If you are painted as a villain and someloser could make their fame hurting you it is enough to terrify
/r/MensRights31/12/16 07:04 AM
1

I agree it was coercion but don't like the rabbithole of calling any kind of coercion force. I get how fear of bodily harm compels people to do stuff. These days internet threats can be as scary as being held at gunpoint. We should abandon "forced" in vocabulary and use terms like "coerced" or "threatened" more
/r/MensRights31/12/16 07:02 AM
0

Wasn't "forced", he backed down.
/r/MensRights31/12/16 07:00 AM
2

Parental obligations and rights should be tied together. They should be opted into with consent. A woman opting to carry a child is de facto consent unless she can make a decent argument for having no access to abortion. Those who simply own the genetic material did not we facto consent simply by it having been used. This protects men and women. A woman could have her egg stolen and used to conceive with sperm against her permission. I would also protect her.
/r/MensRights31/12/16 06:53 AM
1

Boy who never felt comfortable relating anger here. Hypocrite mom verbally encourages expression while hypocritically acting like a delicate victim you couldn't risk ruffling.
/r/MensRights31/12/16 06:50 AM
10

I guess because potentially upsetting someone through trickery is not always illegal. Perfect comeback would be "oh no I don't want my child to be born with AIDS!"
/r/MensRights31/12/16 06:45 AM
6

Some old African tribes historically had the younger males fellate the older ones to gain manhood. This is less harmful than prepuce flaying but the world would not tolerate it as open spectacle as it does this.
/r/MensRights31/12/16 06:42 AM
3

World would lose it. Obviously us males are just let's though so we can be "fixed" in plain sight.
/r/MensRights31/12/16 06:40 AM
1

We must find a way to hold MoveOn accountable for this and any other instances of abuse. If we boycott them what is an alternative petition site?
/r/MensRights31/12/16 06:38 AM
5

It is not disrupting a meeting if you ask a question during a questions and answers panel and they give you permission.
/r/MensRights31/12/16 06:32 AM
1

Is this because she was unable to well the comic because they kicked her out for speaking at the panel and/or GG poster at Calgary Expo?
/r/MensRights31/12/16 06:30 AM
30

I'm convinced 95% of "men" harassing women online are simply feminists trying to convince more women to feel like victims and join the sisterhood.
/r/MensRights31/12/16 06:22 AM
2

I wish someone would start a fan comic set in that universe where the sisters/girlfriends of these men track down their attackers and educate them on the mistske they made. Then track down and debunk the false rape accusations which led them on. However the twist is... one of the men they attacked actually turns out to be a rapist! But he became one because his mother abused him and his dad and made him a misogynist.
/r/MensRights30/11/16 04:18 AM
1

I guess it would beokay if they eventually turn it o its head by realizing they cucked up a case and question all their old ones. I know they must have done that in superhero comics. Judtwatched the Hercules film that Dwayne Johnson stars in and it does that.
/r/MensRights28/11/16 05:51 AM
1

Men can avoid paying child support through abstinence. It is much more reliable than hoping a woman will make the choice you want. It is a lie to promote the myth that women having access to abortion makes sex less risky to men. Their access does nothing to obligate them to use it. The nanny state has continued to increase in spite of abortion being accessible. They want to reproduce. I will not hold back my views in response to concern-trolls. Yes feminists love that I want to sterilize women w…
/r/MensRights28/11/16 05:49 AM
1

You start watching it recently too?
/r/MensRights28/11/16 05:45 AM
1

I couldn't say since only two EPs have aired in Canada. Americans might know more about future EPs. I will feel super bad if they have a false rape accusation episode, a male victim episode or a female perpetrator episode. They pretty much need all t three to earn my forgiveness though.
/r/MensRights28/11/16 05:44 AM
7

Harley Quinn wasn't originally a misandrist. I mainly know the original DCAU version. Not aue how recent comics changed her. Now she and Ivy are "super hero girls" don't even recognize them.
/r/MensRights23/11/16 11:38 AM
5

In the two episodes I've seen so far she attacks from behind in darkness which should prevent fire if competent. Third attack the guy overpowers her so her friend murders him with a wrench.
/r/MensRights23/11/16 11:37 AM
9

Yes. Though its harder to link with present issues given that men don't press charges or do collective collages on bathroom walls naming women as rapists. I would do the swap over false rape accusations instead. "If you lie about a man without consent we will kick your ass" or something. Promising basketball starlet crippled after she says her boyfriend raped her and he files a police report for libel and is laughed off but then heroes witness this and believe him and take justice into their own…
/r/MensRights23/11/16 11:11 AM
6

I don't think we need to wait a generation. Even redpilled I still love these man hating college girls even though my brain tells me not to..I'm not even sure I would have recognized the problem with this show a year ago.
/r/MensRights23/11/16 10:32 AM
1

I couldn't say without investigating the cabinet choices more. Lack of abortions isn't men's problem. We never had control over that to begin with. I'd be glad if they outlawed it and then theyd have to make concessions to male paternal control before we get on board to get it back. I don't see how being a man of color has changed going from Obama to Trump. Barack didn't exactly fix racial tensions.
/r/MensRights23/11/16 09:13 AM
2

In regard to what? Supporting the stay at home moms?
/r/MensRights22/11/16 06:55 AM
1

Maybe he backs Ivanka for 2020?
/r/MensRights22/11/16 06:55 AM
1

Damn... Maybe I should be less paranoid about the prospect of defending myself if a woman ever attacks me. Although still best to run if possible because more extreme penalties than this are likely for second time charges.
/r/MensRights18/11/16 10:53 AM
1

How many examples can you show me where there is a no jail sentence for assault on a woman by a man?
/r/MensRights17/11/16 03:53 PM
1

I dunno. I'm going to avoid topless teen photos to be safe. Anything under 20 and I'm paranoid about getting vanned.
/r/MensRights17/11/16 03:51 PM
1

2001
/r/MensRights17/11/16 09:32 AM
3

From what I can tell the hits to the head came from. Shengliang​ Wan a boy who was charged with murder and is trying to plea it down to assault. For all we know this girl just kicked him in the foot or something. No matter where i think more than a fine is needs. She should be jailed for assault too. A lighter sentence given itnis less injurious but still assault. You know damn well if a man came along and kicked a female in the shin he would be jailed.
/r/MensRights17/11/16 09:07 AM
5

Um no. Please go. If there are to be student/teacher.laws then apply them fairly. Also he was.a.tutor. tutors don't decide your grade so there isn't a power imbalance. If anything a.student has power over the tutor since the tutornrelies on them for income and can be fired by the parents if the.student complains about them. As for laws prohibiting 50 year olds the same options in sex partners as.18 year D's, no thanks.
/r/MensRights17/11/16 08:42 AM
1

I don't believe you. Source? Canada is not such a utopia in these matters.
/r/MensRights17/11/16 08:40 AM
5

I continue to be amazed that somehow the age to have sex is somehow lower than the age to have nude photos. Seems like it should always be the inverse. How about instead of legal sex with 16 year olds and legal nudes of 18 year olds we have legal sex with 18 year olds and legal nudes of 16 year olds? What is really more risky to health? Potential pregnancy and STDs or some guy fapping at photons?
/r/MensRights17/11/16 08:35 AM
8

As we speak she is probably pressuring him to lie to police and say they planned it together. For any parents actually doing that, have the sense to tape yourselves days in advance and upload it to YouTube saying your plans. If you don't want it tonne a spoiler then make it private. But have it up ahead of time so that the evidence of deception is there. If you can't produce this any subsequent evidence I will ignore.
/r/MensRights17/11/16 08:29 AM
7

If we understand that behavior like this by parent makes children into killers, it isn't far off.
/r/MensRights17/11/16 08:27 AM
1

In all fairness, perhaps she did intend just to sleep and did not have intercourse. Perhaps he jacked off on the sly and then she rolled over unawares onto the pool of it and it flooded in because she was wearing the boxer shorts left by her dead father with a flap in the front.
/r/MensRights17/11/16 08:23 AM
1

Probably explanation is.this rumor was starts.by her collapsing and them catching her and someone confusing that for a.double clothesline tackle.
/r/MensRights15/11/16 10:14 AM
5

As much as I want to believe this I don't see evidence for it. They kept "women are the primary victims of war" out of the media after all.
/r/MensRights15/11/16 10:12 AM
1

Always useful to review election propaganda even after it finishes.
/r/MensRights14/11/16 05:01 AM
1

Tomboys are the cutest. You don't "grow" be relinquishing realistic disdains for an exploitive group. The only growth is in relinquishing hatred for yourself if you are different from the norms of that group.
/r/MensRights09/11/16 10:16 AM
1

Why should I have faith in the way Bianca Bersani interprets data? Also if this is based on convictions, the undocumented could be harder to track down and press charges against.
/r/MensRights09/11/16 10:13 AM
1

That terms for fags who act Japanese and unnecessarily interject Japanese into common language. Pasting a char link doesn't qualify. You are abusing weeaboo the same way demi ists abuse misandry/sexism/rape"etc. Please apologize, Brizd00d, chan? Gomenasai.
/r/MensRights07/11/16 06:40 AM
1

Do you know how long ago this started? http://hayatenogotoku.wikia.com/wiki/Ayumu_Nishizawa has been hamster since 2005. She might have dibs. Is it possible we could condemn bad feminist logic by naming them after some other dumb rodent? Like maybe a gerbil? I don't know any nice girls nicknamed gerbil.
/r/MensRights07/11/16 06:09 AM
1

There are still a lot of variables to consider though. Like it is with condom or without? Swallow or spit? This would influence the likelihood of my wanting to hook up with him if he wanted to experiment with a non-negro.
/r/MensRights07/11/16 06:06 AM
1

Trump didn't say they raped more than Americans. I wojld be fine if he did though. Its likely they do this and many other crimes more often than documented immigrants. They have less to lose and being undocumented it is harder to track suspects down and they know this. Allowing more people to marry IS supporting marriage. The more who benefit the more who will push to keep it. Gay bros tying the knot will not change the idea of man as wallet. If women can't get it directly they'll marry the stat…
/r/MensRights07/11/16 06:04 AM
2

I didn't know she had an ED page. Now to wait for the 34
/r/MensRights05/11/16 08:40 AM
2

This use of hamster as a pejorative upsets me because in Hayate no Gotoku there is a cute girl called this by Nagi Sanzenin on account of how she is always nibbling on snacks.which is cute because she remains fit in spite of it. Your use confuses me. His s SJW behaviour hamster like? Do they nibble also?
/r/MensRights05/11/16 08:38 AM
1

We can't define. We have no input. We cannot protest. So they can declare whatever they want and we must take it. I feel like doing a 180 and saying only men can define sexism. How would that fly?
/r/MensRights05/11/16 08:36 AM
1

H is a victim of BBM erasure by her ignoring his celebration of his massive girth. She cannot internalize his thickcore confidence it is too overwhelming.
/r/MensRights05/11/16 08:35 AM
1

This strategy is hard to implement if you lack a vagina. Consider investing in one.
/r/MensRights05/11/16 08:32 AM
1

On a twists dlevel I have to respect her business savvy and enthusiasm. I've always had grim admiration for snake oil peddlers.
/r/MensRights05/11/16 08:32 AM
1

Not all of us are privileged enough to have computers which can support skyrim please stop triggering me with your NPC praise shitlord.
/r/MensRights05/11/16 08:31 AM
1

That comment does hint in the direction of him receiving rather than giving. The penetrator is more often the active "fucker" in terms of the verb use. Its not written in stone though. I'm sure there are girls outside the pegging circles who talk about fucking guys instead of getting fucked by them while still being the one who I spenetrated. Perhaps the active user of the verb is the one who generates the most motion rather than the one.with the phallus?
/r/MensRights05/11/16 08:29 AM
2

Dear god. Mandatory hijabs would be a better alternative than this.
/r/MensRights05/11/16 08:26 AM
1

Actual economists support either side. You should study the economy yourself. If we tax imports then corporations will manufacture locally. We don't know the entirety if what Clinton did yet due to not having recovered her deleted emails. She did have classified data in the private server. She waited too long on Benghazi. She is a master manipulator to avoid being held accountable. Would be great if she would we that for national interests instead if her own but I doubt she will. I do not see ho…
/r/MensRights05/11/16 08:25 AM
1

I mature my immune system by reusing the same cup for days. At first it was coffee so not a huge deal as then heat would sterilize but now I do t for my wheymilk
/r/MensRights05/11/16 08:20 AM
1

If Michelle is superior why isn't she president? I wouldn't vote for that two face. She and anyone elsenwho jumped on the bawwwagon and cried "assault" in response to the Billy Bush interview.
/r/MensRights05/11/16 08:11 AM
0

As someone who doesn't plan on breeding the less maternity leave the better even if it is sexist. Its like marriage. As mean as bans on same sex marriage are, I like them because a smaller pool of spouses means less opposition to deconstructing it. Same logic, fewer to benefit from maternity leave means easier to dismantle it entirely. Trump correctly identified that some illegal immigrants do crimes like murder and rape. He did not specify gender. Better.security is better for men. Better econo…
/r/MensRights03/11/16 08:33 AM
6

an overweight unattractive man cannot even look below the neckline or he will be accused of being a creeper that is fantasizing about rape. Where are you living, the 1980s? This is 2016, the current year, and you can't look at anything above the neckline either. She will know you are imagining lewd activities and sic the knights on you.
/r/MensRights03/11/16 08:12 AM
8

What gets me is that Cody Rhodes and Damien Sandow both had great moustaches as the Rhodes Scholars but got buried when they promoted Movember because it took attention away from WWE pink month . October.
/r/MensRights03/11/16 08:04 AM
2

Do you recall which male celebrity? Could help us locate it.
/r/MensRights03/11/16 08:02 AM
1

Can you provide evidence supporting your claim? I have heard Milo state a preference for black males but do not recall him going into specifics of who takes what where.
/r/MensRights03/11/16 08:02 AM
3

I believe it would be useful for Ellen to visit a proctologist and go through a health test to better empathize with the men that Movember honours.
/r/MensRights03/11/16 08:00 AM
13

What is "an own goal" or "a massive own goal" ? Some Australian slang?
/r/MensRights02/11/16 09:46 AM
4

I'm not sure how many would have noticed something was up. Looking at the still I would not have assumed the guy had a handicap: http://i2.wp.com/media.globalnews.ca/videostatic/940/715/1800_KICKED_OFF_A_BUS_P_VAF0AYFZ_tnb_2.jpg?w=670&quality=70&strip=all The idea that people should get off thrbus to make way for a woman is wrong though. Stroller or not. They should refund your ticket if they interrupt your trip.
/r/MensRights02/11/16 09:40 AM
1

Harambe would have protected Brock from the violent foreigners. He loves swimmers.
/r/MensRights13/09/16 01:51 AM
1

You are done because you lost jabroni.
/r/MensRights13/09/16 01:51 AM
1

It can be both. Most news is.
/r/MensRights13/09/16 01:50 AM
1

People who abuse censorship do not care if your views.are harmful..just if they are.contrary to their agenda and if they can be painted as harmful. Views do not have to work against a society to be targeted . just THEIR sub-society.
/r/MensRights13/09/16 01:47 AM
1

Trump will make internet freedom real
/r/MensRights06/09/16 09:54 AM
0

Breitbart covers many stories the msm don't touch..they are a good thing
/r/MensRights06/09/16 09:54 AM
1

It is still a more reliable source than most newspapers.
/r/MensRights06/09/16 09:53 AM
3

Well, guess I better look into that DarkNet I keep hearing about. I stopped donating to UNICEF long before this. UN wants to oppress free speech first in comics now in forums.
/r/MensRights06/09/16 09:52 AM
3

Even though this was probably a pseudonym he could have intended it as a joke at his own expense since he is portly. This seems clear later as he gestured at his protruding gut to answer her query. She vaguely summarized that as "at himself" as if to imply the gesture was toward his penis.
/r/MensRights06/09/16 09:08 AM
1

Anyone can identify as trans. If you ever change your name in Canada you can assure it is a private matter by sending a declaration of trans identification.
/r/MensRights06/09/16 08:57 AM
1

Unresponsive means you did not respond. The cop could have assumed she was passed out but that doesn't mean she was. Their priority is taking care of health not aggressively checking for fakers. We do not in any way know she was drunk enough to not respond to police. She could have is mply opted to not respond to them to support her story of unconsciousness and lack of consent.
/r/MensRights06/09/16 08:53 AM
3

Her elbows were apparently scuffedso I would not say no injuries. Nobody is proposing they struggled, that isn't necessary to make it rape.
/r/MensRights06/09/16 08:51 AM
2

I hate the advice to plea out. Not sure I could stomach it.
/r/MensRights06/09/16 08:48 AM
2

The rape charges were withdrawn, his dick never came out, so firstly drop the rape crap, the conviction was for sexual assault relating to him rubbing her off with his finger. He was assaulted by two cyclists. He only admits to fleeing after one tackled him. Fleeing assault is not an indication of guilt. The Swedish cyclists who attacked Brock would be charged for assault if they did not justify it so saying he was doing stuff to an unconscious girl is a great way of doing so. His father has fai…
/r/MensRights05/09/16 03:43 AM
1

The reports say she didn't respond. Not responding does not prove someone was asleep.
/r/MensRights05/09/16 03:37 AM
1

Her mother drove both her and her younger sister there, yes. Also they both pissed in the bushes behind the frathouse. Khizr Muazzam Khan would love these two.
/r/MensRights04/09/16 05:33 AM
2

Its easier to pass out after someone fingers you to orgasm. Its harder to pass out when four guys start beating you up.
/r/MensRights04/09/16 05:32 AM
1

Brock was 17x the limit while Emily was 3x so yeah
/r/MensRights04/09/16 05:31 AM
0

Except she wasn't passed out. She was faking. Eyes opened when pinched, vomited unassisted.
/r/MensRights04/09/16 05:30 AM
1

I bet you didn't even check the stats. Brock was 17x the legal driving limit she was only 3x based in estimates. Also the estimates were done by a woman. Also we are never shown the math. The actual blood tests were taken about six hours later. She is given too many liberties to cuck with the figures.
/r/MensRights04/09/16 05:29 AM
2

If I was drunk and a drunk woman asked if she could give me a handjob and I said yes and then began to doze off after I ejaculated all over her hand and then a pair of lesbian rollerbladers came and beat her up I do not think it would be fair to send her to jail.
/r/MensRights04/09/16 05:27 AM
2

No deez. It was not sexual assault. She consented and he was drunker than her. He was 17x the legal limit and she was only 3x. There was no proof she was unconcious. Opened her eyes when pinched by paramedic who sw her vomit unassisted. Sounds conscious to me.
/r/MensRights04/09/16 05:25 AM
1

You underestimate how beta some boyfriends could be. Could have easily bought it. Keep in mind he would be basted if he dumped her right away. He would be condemned as an evil victim blamer. He would have to hold in another year and dumpnher for some other reason.
/r/MensRights04/09/16 05:23 AM
3

3 months is plenty for being drunk and disorderly in public. If any more time is issued it should be to Emily and her sister for urinating in public and drunk in public.
/r/MensRights04/09/16 05:22 AM
1

The games preceded the anime. Anime was based on the games.
/r/TheRedPill05/08/16 04:09 AM
1

This. Fuck I can't even try out this game due to no cellphone. Cells are for people with social lives. Even when I did have one it didn't have internet or apps and was not a camera phone.
/r/TheRedPill05/08/16 04:08 AM
1

In Toronto 1) a woman shot at players from her balcony with a pellet gun 2) a driver playing it hit a pedestrian playing it
/r/TheRedPill05/08/16 04:04 AM
1

Give it time. Creep shaming shows up everywhere.
/r/TheRedPill05/08/16 04:03 AM
1

Prove it. They must ban names like "pikachu the loli raper" or something.
/r/TheRedPill05/08/16 04:01 AM
1

There is no red pill or blue pill only red team and blue team.
/r/TheRedPill05/08/16 04:00 AM
1

Do you even fight the pokemon you catch? For all its social.aspects these seem less like games more like click bait. It makes me think of someone perceiving Wii Boxing as a better fighting game that Killer Instinct.
/r/TheRedPill05/08/16 03:54 AM
1

This is probably easier with a wingman since it avoids the creepy loner vibe.
/r/TheRedPill05/08/16 03:51 AM
1

I wish jailbait wasn't off limits.
/r/TheRedPill05/08/16 03:49 AM
1

You should specify "Pokémon-PLAYING bitches" because search any species in Paheal and you will understand.
/r/TheRedPill05/08/16 03:48 AM
1

Ditto. So long as it isn't exploitive and she wants to game I'm down.
/r/TheRedPill05/08/16 03:47 AM
1

How many of these girls were legit fans if the show or games before this app though ? I want to weed out the fake gamer girls.
/r/TheRedPill05/08/16 03:44 AM
1

Screening is done by lawyers in court. I've never been called that far. Maybe I need to register to vote again?
/r/MensRights11/07/16 08:23 AM
1

Turner was 19 at the time, 20 is a year later during the trial.
/r/MensRights08/07/16 08:35 PM
1

Feminist comedians are obviously impervious to the law.
/r/MensRights08/07/16 08:34 PM
1

No way, guy has to clear his name. Government should pay him for lost time and force the swimming organization and university to un-ban him and issue apologies.
/r/MensRights08/07/16 08:33 PM
1

I guess that would imply that he fingered her while she was on the ground (pretty damning evidence) Why would this be damning? Brock volunteered the information that he fingered her. Is he obligated to only do this if she is standing up? edit Oh wait... I'm upvoting you now, sorry.
/r/MensRights08/07/16 08:33 PM
1

The Swedes claim they intervened at 12:55 so taking 20min as WoG this would mean Brock and Emily began hooking up at 12:35, 6 minutes after she left messages to her sister and friend. Naturally we are not allowed to hear these recordings or even read transcripts of them. We just have to assume they said nothing to incriminate her and they were totally incoherent.
/r/MensRights08/07/16 08:31 PM
1

I'd be thinking 'sweet, she is orgasming, nothing can get through to her in this state of bliss' Which is probably what was happening.
/r/MensRights08/07/16 08:30 PM
1

She did not give consent, she was unconscious. Proof? I would say that it becomes obvious that a person is unconscious after only a few seconds. The body goes completely limp and becomes very heavy when the owner of the body is no longer supporting their own weight If she went limp how did she go from supine to fetal? If she couldn't support her weight then how did she vomit without assistance? She opened her eyes when the paramedic pinched her. Do you consider that this could also mean she was …
/r/MensRights08/07/16 08:29 PM
2

How long does it take for someone to go from dancing to unconscious without consuming additional alcohol? By the alcohol going from your stomach (where it does no harm) into your bloodstream via the small intestines. See http://www.forcon.ca/learning/alcohol.html this can take up to an hour. Any alcohol she drank from 12:10pm-12:50pm could have taken until 1:10am-1:50pm (when police were present) to hit her. She could have gone from faking unconsciousness to actually falling unconscious. Then sh…
/r/MensRights08/07/16 07:49 PM
1

An awkward teen boy might do that with someone he just met. Implied consent is more a thing with couples who have already done fingering in the past.
/r/MensRights08/07/16 07:45 PM
2

Where are you getting Brock being half-naked? Far as I know he was fully clothed. His pants were certainly on, was he shirtless or something? Also by his account he didn't hear other voices until already having walked away from her. I catch myself envisioning accounts of this event as happening in isolation and in silence. I have to keep reminding myself and other people that this did NOT happen in some box. All of this happened behind a frat house during a party which was still going. Parties h…
/r/MensRights08/07/16 07:44 PM
3

He claims he didn't notice her being unconscious, but he noticed two guys approaching and ran away? No, you obviously did not read his testimony or are lying. Brock's version is that he stopped fingering her because he began to feel sick. He only said he vaguely heard some voices as he was walking away looking for someplace to possibly puke, and then he was attacked. He never mentions noticing them approach him. He only mentions running away AFTER being TACKLED. The father's letter doesn't imply…
/r/MensRights08/07/16 07:41 PM
1

It is plausible to me that she passed out and it took him a bit to notice. I think when he did notice, that's why he felt sick and decided to stop and maybe find a spot to possibly throw up. I guess he managed to hold it in once 4 guys had him pinned on his back since if he threw up he would have choked to death. Naturally, the prosecutor mocks him for not killing himself. It is also entirely plausible that Emily never passed out and simply voluntarily did not respond to the attack. She knew tha…
/r/MensRights08/07/16 07:38 PM
2

There is no proof of Brock's guilt in any sexual assault. There is far more evidence that these 4 men are guilty of unwarranted assault. Brock should get time served for being drunk in public, that's it. Emma should get that too, and also indecent exposure and public urination, along with Tiffany and Julia, as they all admitted to breaking that law in their testimonies and were never charged.
/r/MensRights08/07/16 07:35 PM
1

Actually he was charged initially with 'raping an intoxicated person' and 'raping an unconscious person'. Both these charges remained in place for months. It was only months later once they couldn't find his DNA on her body that they removed the charges. Probably smart since there was no evidence of sexual intercourse, his pants being on. It was all based on the fraudulent testimony of the Swedes saying they saw him thrusting on her.
/r/MensRights08/07/16 07:34 PM
2

she didn't voluntarily go somewhere to have sex with him Source? The dragging her behind a dumpster and taking her panties off happened after she was unconscious Source on her being dragged? The running away when spotted Source on Brock running merely from being 'spotted'? By his testimony he ran after being tackled the first time by one of the Swedes. A man doesn't have a right to flee when assaulted? He has to stay and white knight for the girl he was fingering to make sure the Swedes don't ra…
/r/MensRights08/07/16 07:32 PM
1

is it plausible that someone lies down behind a dumpster and consents to being fingere Yes it is. Also this 'dumpster' aspect is being sensationalized. The dumpster was simply providing privacy, they weren't laying in trash or anything. It was behind the frat house and there were woods and bushes behind the frat house. Like the ones she and Tiffany and Julia peed in less than an hour prior. My guess is this could have happened on grass. I can't recall clarification of these details. then almost …
/r/MensRights08/07/16 07:28 PM
2

Maybe not an entire pine needle, but we were never told the measurements of these alleged needles. For all we know it was a pine needle fragment 1 millimetre long or something.
/r/MensRights08/07/16 07:23 PM
1

I think she said she woke up with a bit of blood on hands/elbows. That could have happened by trying to stop herself from falling as Brock testifies she did.
/r/MensRights08/07/16 07:22 PM
1

Being high on endorphins from horniness and orgasm could also dull pain receptors so she may not notice minor injuries and ask him to stop in the midst of it. That's why there's the 'feeling sore the next day' effect from a lot of sex. It isn't immediately noticed. I've gotten cuts on my body in the midst of doing vigorous physical activity and not noticed until an hour later.
/r/MensRights08/07/16 07:21 PM
2

You need to study up on your terms. Blackout drunk means you forgot what happened. It doesn't mean you are unable to function. Brock has never claimed to be blackout drunk. He says he remembers what happened. Emily is the one who claimed to be blackout drunk by saying she doesn't remember what happened. Blurred vision or darkness or impaired hearing from intoxication or LOUD MUSIC (keep in mind this was right behind a frat house with a party still going) could all explain, IF she passed out, why…
/r/MensRights08/07/16 07:19 PM
2

This is why I will never turn down Jury duty if offered. Still waiting.
/r/MensRights08/07/16 07:15 PM
1

"appears" being the key word, the tests given by the paramedic all assume co-operation, all tests can be passed by faking. The aspects of the test which catch fakers, she failed. She opened her eyes wide in shock when the paramedic did a pinch test, and she vomited without assistance. I don't give a shit if she didn't respond to police. If she wanted to play unconscious to keep her relationship w/ BF (and reputation) intact, why wouldn't she wait?
/r/MensRights08/07/16 07:14 PM
1

I think it is worth mentioning that as an athlete, he probably had a high metabolism able to burn off alcohol very quickly. By the time his blood was taken at 3:15am he was probably able to wreck that alcohol inside him. Particularly since he was engaged in running for his life from a pair of cyclists and then wrestling 4 men off and then probably being man-handled by bullying police. FEEL THE BURN. In the meanwhile Emily with her dinner eaten at 9pm would have kept her sober even after consumin…
/r/MensRights08/07/16 07:13 PM
1

Nope, Brock was over 17x the legal limit at 0.171. The limit is different for persons under 20, it's only 0.1 Emily was measured at 0.12 which was only 50% higher than the legal limit of 0.8 as it applies to persons over 21. Her blood was taken 4.5 hours after Brock's was so Alice T. King was given leeway to 'estimate' just how high it might have been based on hypothetical details.
/r/MensRights08/07/16 07:08 PM
1

It's probably worth mentioning that Brock had a cell phone on his person at the time, so the officer could have been mistaken. It was dark.
/r/MensRights08/07/16 07:06 PM
2

I am confident less than 1% of the people who have formed opinions about this case haven't bothered to read a full page of this report, much less all 53 pages of it. We are in the minority. Society is doomed. I'm trying to figure out if it is possible to split PDFs into smaller files and to get a program to change it into copyable text. Increased accessibility would make increasing awareness of the complaint easier. Any interest?
/r/MensRights08/07/16 07:06 PM
1

Brock obviously had a boner because the 4 men wrestling with him were very handsome. I don't even know why the boner is brought up, is it a crime to have a boner when a horny girl is orgasming from your touch? Are boy expected to immediately deflate as soon as they get attacked and the girl plays possum?
/r/MensRights08/07/16 07:03 PM
1

Being blackout drunk doesn't mean you aren't aware of your surroundings, it means you won't remember having been aware of them. It results in a loss of short term memory but it doesn't mean you are unconscious during that lost time. Which is why it is absurb that Emily is so confident she didn't consent when she claims not to remember anything past midnight. Her memory conveniently ends when her bladder empties.
/r/MensRights08/07/16 07:02 PM
2

The initial false rape accusation by the prosecutor (later withdrawn when none of Brock's DNA was found on her) was based on that unbacked testimony that he was thrusting on her 10 times. If she was unconscious and he was only concerned with getting off by grinding on her then why would he finger her at all?
/r/MensRights08/07/16 07:01 PM
0

Have you read the times given in the initial complaint? Doe admits that at midnight she and 2 other girls went to piss in the bushes outside. Squatting requires more balance than standing, if she was obviously tipsy then her sister Tiffany and Colleen McCann would have also escorted her to the residence of Julia Nacey Maggioncalda as they did with Trea McElhone. Also after the midnight triple-piss the 3 girls were talking with 3 guys before they left at 12:10pm. Julia texted Emily at 12:18pm say…
/r/MensRights08/07/16 06:59 PM
2

Brock was also intoxicated, so he was unable to consent to her enveloping his finger with her genitals by thrusting up against him and pulling his back onto her.
/r/MensRights08/07/16 06:44 PM
1

I would like to point out here that Brock was over 17 times the legal limit. As a teenager, the legal driving limit for him is 0.1 and his blood was estimated at 0.171. Emily's blood was measured at 0.12 and conveniently inflated to over 0.24 via an estimation by Alice T. King based on her group's stories. Turner's blood was drawn at 3:15am by Adria Aguilar. Emily Doe's blood was drawn at 7:45am by Joy Mitchell. The blood was not refrigerated until 1:10pm. The 4 1/2 hour difference between blood…
/r/MensRights08/07/16 06:43 PM
2

You do realize there's no proof she was unable to walk or passed out right? She actually opened her eyes when the paramedic pinched her and then shut them again, and she was able to vomit without assistance before the ambulance took her away. She absolutely could have faked both unconsciousness and having been blackout, and that's the problem here. It's like the court just assumes she's being honest about everything. Another problem is it does take some time for the bloodstream to absorb alcohol…
/r/MensRights08/07/16 06:36 PM
1

fast forward to two guys finding Brock fingering her unconscious body I thought you were going to remain neutral here. There's no evidence that she was unconscious while being fingered. It's plausible she was conscious but still/quiet enough that in the dark the Swedes could have wrongly assumed she was unconscious. When did Brock say she passed out and he didn't realize it? I think at worst he realistically accepted this was a possibility, but obviously if he 'did not realize' he could not have…
/r/MensRights08/07/16 06:31 PM
1

How was it proven? All so-called proof I have seen is either heresay or stuff that can happen during rough consensual groping. Brock also had to puke, not seeing the point here. Brock was denied the chance to go back and help her when he was attacked. He had.to rid himself of puke first to be functional. Otherwise he might have puked on her face and suffocated her.
/r/MensRights23/06/16 06:53 AM
0

I refuse to call Brock.an assaulter. Inadequate proof. Allowing discussion to be silenced over and over is what damages discussion. Tired of this promotion of pussying out by concerntrolls.
/r/MensRights22/06/16 08:17 AM
2

It is possible either way, point is, reasonable doubt exists. I will wager on a guy not wanting to do that to a passed out girl. Fingering doesn't make the guy come so it wouldn't normally be done with selfish aims.
/r/MensRights21/06/16 09:21 AM
0

Probably yes, but it is good for the nation and the court can bring up good talking points to turn intelligent people to his.side. The masses.will always hats.but we can't avoid all confrontation in fear of drawing their attention. That is what has led us here.
/r/MensRights21/06/16 09:20 AM
1

This would only be cute if it was Harley and Mister J.
/r/MensRights18/06/16 02:05 AM
1

I really hope his lawyers are archive.org / archive.is like crazy gathering evidence ofneveryine wklho sayz this in prep for a massive lawsuit. This could he done whether or not he wins an appeal.
/r/MensRights18/06/16 02:00 AM
1

Also like Roman Polanski
/r/MensRights18/06/16 02:00 AM
1

I really hope his lawyers are archive.org / archive.is like crazy gathering evidence ofneveryine wklho sayz this in prep for a massive lawsuit. This could he done whether or not he wins an appeal.
/r/MensRights18/06/16 01:59 AM
1

I think the main issue is they need to be informed of the time limit to act on it. Stuff like this shouk be discussed every year of public school. I wojldbe for extending the limit for homeschooled kids since an abusive parent could withhold the info to protect themselves.
/r/MensRights18/06/16 01:58 AM
2

Alibies should only serve to help narrow down suspect lists and save police work. A lacknof alibi should not benguiktynbut they act like that.
/r/MensRights18/06/16 01:56 AM
1

How hard would it be for the Harvard Law college to secede from the rest? If anyone couldnmanagd the legal loopholes it would be them. Would be amazing. I hope whoever thought this up gets accused of rape at an unspecified date that they cannot invalidate.
/r/MensRights18/06/16 01:53 AM
2

Everyone should get access to council that way both.accuser and accused get it.
/r/MensRights18/06/16 01:51 AM
1

Harvey Mansfield for chief justice of the supreme court please. Do it Trump. Excellent last name too.
/r/MensRights18/06/16 01:49 AM
0

Can you just say clit? I don't like our multipurpose anatomy being used as some kind of insult.
/r/MensRights18/06/16 01:48 AM
2

That is disgusting, a woman shirking her duties to expel foreigners and risking our safety at the hands of a potential suicide bomber all for a quick lay. The boy is probably in doctrines to sire sons with westerners so this doesn't seem lime much of an ultimatum, more like double win in his eyes in most cases. In the.rare case of his being a skeptic who resisted indoctrination it does suck. But in all fairness, refugees bypass the application process so if they pay in some other way it is not a…
/r/MensRights18/06/16 01:41 AM
-1

He already has a new lawyer preparing an appeal. Looming forward to it. He should plead to drunk and disorderly conduct, the dumpster was not his property and an inappropriate place to engage in sex acts. The same charges should be placed against big mama. Perhaps his condition for pleading should be that she also plea first. It sounds to me like noticing it could have been what made him queasy and made him stop. Or else she could have been cooperating when he stopped. A girl who is passively en…
/r/MensRights17/06/16 05:49 PM
2

Is it okay to assume all pedophiles are molesters? Is it okay to assume only pedophiles are molesters? Is it okay for laypeople outside psychological careers to think they can accurately diagnose paraphilic disorders and other mental illnesses? I wonder what response one would get to these inquiries... Is it okay to assume all women will make up lies about getting raped? Is it okay to assume all women want to fuck prepubescent boys? Is it okay to assume all blacks are murderers?
/r/MensRights17/06/16 05:33 PM
1

Something big mama appeared to be when police arrived several minutes later. Something she was not verified to be when the Swedes.attacked or when the finger bang began.
/r/MensRights17/06/16 05:27 PM
1

Holy fuck, had heard of the glass on face incident but had no idea the injuries were this bad until now. That was more injurious and life-fucking than a forgotten sandy fingerbang could ever be. Hypocrites.
/r/MensRights17/06/16 05:17 PM
1

The only one who seems to examine this is Brock himself. Her regrets getting drunk since it led him to do intimate.acts with.big mama who was cheating in her boyfriend and thus had reason to deny remembering consenting.
/r/MensRights17/06/16 05:12 PM
0

She should definitely be charged with being drunk in public. That is the only conviction I think is appropriate for Brock as.well. Assault for the 4 men who attacked Brock. No evidence that he ran.
/r/MensRights17/06/16 05:10 PM
-1

She should definitely be charged with being drunk in public. That is the only conviction I think is appropriate for Brock as.well. Assault for the 4 men who attacked Brock. No evidence that he ran.
/r/MensRights17/06/16 05:10 PM
1

He shouldn't go to jail any more than she should. Drunk in public is all we know either did.and that is usually a.fine. I would be okay with Universities banning students for drunkenness so long as it was applied fairly and did not single him out while ignoring other offenders.
/r/MensRights17/06/16 05:10 PM
-1

They can, but should be punished if they do. Brock did not do that. He got verbal consent to finger her and was so focused on the job (and over twice the driving limit himself) that he was a bit slow to notice she passed out during it. He stopped as soon as he noticed this. Not seeing anything illegal here. There is no MensRea.
/r/MensRights17/06/16 05:10 PM
0

Its not mugging if you pull out your wallet and shove bills in a man's hand while you are drunk.
/r/MensRights17/06/16 05:05 PM
5

Polyfluorite you seem to be under the impression that big mama was unconscious when Brock's finger entered her. There is no evidence of that so why do you think this? Due to a jury clearly not having or ignoring reasonable doubts voting for it? Also rape is penis not finger, please don't abuse the term. Manually stimulating an unconscious person can happen absent any sort of Mens Rea if it begins with both conscious and one passes out during it. It is polite to desist when you notice that has ha…
/r/MensRights17/06/16 05:03 PM
1

No, this would be a false.flag. Well poisoning is presenting false data or distracting arguments into an existing conversation, not misrepresenting a group with fake stances.
/r/MensRights17/06/16 04:54 PM
1

We should not call it a.rape.case. There.was.no rape.
/r/MensRights17/06/16 04:52 PM
0

Do not feel compelled to replace broken lightbulbs or clear debris from the stairwell OP.
/r/MensRights17/06/16 04:49 PM
3

Which is perhaps what she is.doing. or using objects
/r/MensRights17/06/16 04:47 PM
1

It is not a crime to be raped by a minor if that is what happened. I just do not necessarily believe her claims. Of course if a teen girl raped a middle aged man society would care little for his explanation of events so I do empathize with wanting to throw her to the wolves by default to even the scales... but I also want to be better than them. No amount of reflexive hate can even out the true problem of gynocentrism.
/r/MensRights30/05/16 02:53 AM
2

Him reporting first makes his case better... Then again I feel sexist thinking that way since I would not think it makes a woman's case better. Different contexts in all already biased society though. Would need to read more about this Australia case to come to conclusions about it.
/r/MensRights21/05/16 09:15 AM
2

I would care if he was.300 pounds and she 100. I would be petrified and freeze up if assaulted by a woman for fear of injuring her and being branded the attacker. If anything being bigger works against you since one will naturally be biased against for that. Her pic matters to me since whether she is a hot or ugly 51yo affects the plausibility of whether or not a given person would want to assault them or not. Does it mention who pressed charges first? Kind of wondering if it is some middle grou…
/r/MensRights21/05/16 03:21 AM
7

Minor nitpick about your choice of title xyno... "You’re going to hear a story, that (the minor,) a five-foot, six-inch, 120-pound teenage boy was going to the store get to some gum before he went to a big event in his life,” Cale told the jury. “You’re going to hear that while he was riding his bike to go get gum he encountered a five-foot, one-inch ... 130-pound, 51-year-old, highly intoxicated Laurel Lee" Based on this article.it was her lawyer Cale.not the accused Lee herself who made statem…
/r/MensRights21/05/16 02:49 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter