TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Cute_Gur_3173 Archive

View 2 posts and 65 comments by Cute_Gur_3173 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
109

DebateCute_Gur_3173/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/24 06:14 PM
0

DebateCute_Gur_3173/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/24 12:22 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

I'd challenge that by pointing out that all of the women can just trivially reject the man. The man might have a lot more choice, but he is still 100% dependent on one of the women accepting his advances. Man doesn't approach: No choice for either party. Equal power. Man approaches: Choice for either party (in favor of the man). Ultimate power still in the hands of women.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/24 12:26 AM
1

Ok, well, I spent some time with a PUA. He approached 9 women in a night. Got rejected by the first 8. Got laid with the 9th. Would you consider him more powerful than the women who rejected him?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/24 12:07 AM
2

The go-getter mass approach method doesn't seem to be working. It might get some men what they want, but at what price? The collective self esteem of men is now at an all time low.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/24 11:53 PM
1

Nope.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/24 11:31 PM
0

Ignoring someone takes effort Interesting take. By the very nature of taking up someone's cognitive space for a few seconds, you exert power over them. Not sure I agree, but interesting nonetheless.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/24 09:49 PM
1

Would be interested in your argument. Haven't been convinced by any of the arguments in this thread. Letting people come to you is basic power dynamics 101.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/24 09:28 PM
2

Nobody has any power over anyone because they show them an ad on Youtube. The person receiving the ad can just adblock it or skip it. Same with someone approaching. The person being approached isn't even forced to acknowledge the approacher. Can just straight up ignore.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/24 07:15 PM
8

you’re asking them to consider you without being asked That's like saying a Youtube marketer has a lot of power because he can run ads on people.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/24 06:56 PM
2

if he didn’t interfere with their day. Key word being if. But he does, and here we are.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/24 06:47 PM
7

Whoever approaches has the power of deciding whether anyone will get approached at all, which is power itself. Nah, that person may still get approached by someone else. Only place this would be true would be in a small tribe, where everyone has limited options.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/24 06:39 PM
19

Well. It does seem a lot of men aren't happy being in this "competition"
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/24 06:32 PM
-3

The default male mating strategy these days is reminiscent of the one used by male spiders. No wonder we have so many men complaining.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/24 06:30 PM
1

Population takes care of itself. If life is easy, people stop breeding. If it's hard, people start breeding again. That's why we still see high birth rates in developing countries, and why we might see a decline in world population soon. Life is simply gonna be too easy for the majority of folks. If life gets hard again, people will change their ways. And we might see a shift back towards collectivism and high birth rates. But I doubt it, cause AI.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/24 06:51 PM
1

Our collective pool of resources is increasing every day. That may not be immediately visible due to short term fluctuations in wealth distribution, but as time goes towards infinity, so does our pool of resources (barring any major global setback). The problems you describe appear transient to me. I mean you can't seriously argue that life today is harder than it was 100 years ago.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/24 05:17 PM
-1

Our collective pool of resources is only increasing every day, thanks to advancements in technology. The problems you are describing appear transient in nature and will probably resolve themselves with time. Re birth rate: I think the smart people that rule the world consider the world population self-regulating. What does that mean? It means that tough(er) conditions will naturally lead to an increase in population, and easier conditions will naturally lead to a decrease. A decrease in world po…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/24 05:10 PM
1

I don't know about you, but I think a lot of people (especially younger ones) are actually very excited about replacing their biological dad with daddy government.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/24 04:25 PM
0

Life IS getting harder in so many different ways. Quite the contrary actually. Life is only getting easier. That's why we are seeing these kind of developments in the first place. If life was hard, we'd be tribed up, and out there hunting.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/24 03:08 PM
1

When I am an old and sick man I would gladly accept a high chance of death so that my great grandchildren do not grow up stunted and suicidal and have an actual economy to inherit. This is easy to say now. Let's see when you get older. The facts: Covid affected old people disproportionately Old people rule the world People look out for themselves first
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/24 03:00 PM
0

What's interesting to me is whether we are social animals out of necessity or out of desire. Did the hunter gatherers experience a strong drive to team up, or was it more out of necessity? Life was tough for the solitary hunter. These days it's not so tough anymore.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/24 02:52 PM
4

To address this from another angle highly individualistic modern societies like ours are dependent on a large surplus value input - it's more expensive to live alone. Everyone is dependent on the labour of parents (one way or another) to maintain the labour pool that creates this surplus value. This hits the nail on the head and I would have liked to cover it in the OP. Exactly because of this ever growing surplus, people are now adopting individualism like never before. It has never been easier…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/24 02:38 PM
1

Was the nuclear family fully normalized 20 years after its inception? These societal shifts take time.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/24 02:30 PM
1

People seem to forget that the OG hunter gatherers were actually solitary. Many apex predators hunt and live alone, only coming together to mate.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/24 02:28 PM
2

Exactly, and with things like UBI and social welfare developing, as well as general technological advancements like AI, you won't even need that much money in the future.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/24 02:26 PM
1

I'd argue that these retirement homes are actually part of the reason we are seeing this development. Previously it was not particularly feasible to grow very old alone. These days it very much is. Elderly care is only getting better. You don't necessarily need a partner to take care of your old self today, and you almost certainly won't in the future.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/24 01:58 PM
1

We've been trending towards individualism since the Industrial Age. First it was tribes being dissolved, then it was extended family dissolving into nuclear families, now it's nuclear families dissolving into transient relationships. I'm not seeing a reversal of this development. If anything, social structures will continue to collapse, as technology advances and makes it easier for the individual to get by. We're trending towards a future, that consists of a sea of disconnected individuals, wit…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/24 01:51 PM
2

Stages of primary socialization: Tribe Extended family Nuclear family Transient relationships ? It's clear that we've been heading towards this stage since the Industrial Age. Tribes developed out of necessity. Not because of an inherent desire to "tribe up". As the world becomes more advanced, social structures will cease to exist, and individualism might reign once again.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/24 01:38 PM
11

Never seen a male immigrant with a local girl where I live. Most of the immigrants here arrive as guest workers from SEA, and they do food delivery / manual labour. Hang out in groups (3-6 guys usually). You'll spot them at the local Western Union queuing to send money back to their relatives in their home countries.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/24 04:27 PM
7

Yeah, leave, OP. This was uncalled for. Exitmaxx your way out.
/r/ExRedPill22/08/24 01:47 AM
1

Where do ya see the assumptions body. The proof is on the tube and everywhere around you. Sure, there are men with standards, but these are the minority.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/24 12:56 AM
1

Makes me wanna go to a salsa class just to take a piss on all of the guys there trawling for ass. "LOOK MAN, I HAVEN'T GOTTEN LAID YET, WHEN CAN I HAZ MY MONEY BACK?"
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/24 12:35 AM
1

Get a girl friend to go out in public and ask 100 random men if they would have sex with her. See how many say yes. Or go on youtube and watch someone else do it.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/24 11:14 PM
4

Go in public and ask 100 random men if they would have sex with you. See how many say yes. Or go on youtube and watch someone else do it.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/24 11:12 PM
-4

The cum dumpster threshold is extremely low. Men will fuck anything with a pulse, including socially uncalibrated women. A male calling you cute should never be seen as validation. It just means he is willing to fuck you. Like 80% of other women.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/24 10:36 PM
2

Byzantium pick up hack is to simply dress in purple.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/24 08:47 PM
6

The availability of PUA videos might have something to do with it as well. Some of those are pretty de-humanising. Not a good advertisement for "going out in the field".
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/24 08:36 PM
5

in large metropolises like Tokyo, Buenos Aires, Constantinople or Chicago Good one.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/24 08:26 PM
2

Isn't that what the sub redpillwomen is all about? Approaching the top tier guys, not to get sex, but to get relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/24 08:17 PM
0

Strong comeback. Refuting a claim with an ad hominem. You obviously know a lot about rationality, haha.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/24 04:02 PM
-1

Did I hit a nerve somewhere?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/24 03:57 PM
1

I'd argue that's a better way of using porn. If you just use it for 5 minutes to get off quickly, you're only gonna have 1 orgasm and your solo sex session is gonna suck.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/24 03:17 PM
1

It’s probably why women spend so much time on “solo sex” then. They are fantasizing all of these emotional attraction scenarios. Solo sex is primarily used for pleasure and stress relief. Incorporating fantasies into a solo sex session can enhance these effects. Men just want any woman to be physically attracted to them in the first place. Therefore they often don’t need these long, drawn-out solo sex sessions that are likely mentally simulating romance scenarios. Again, you are arguing that for…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/24 03:09 PM
2

Bad analogy. A vibrator is more akin to a cock ring or a fleshlight, and a romance novel to an anime. Video games compete directly against solo sex (both are pleasure-giving, solo activities). Porn? Porn heightens your stimulation, so it can be used as a tool in solo sex, but most people don't need that additional level of stimulation and it actually ends up harming them.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/24 02:55 PM
2

Incel behavior already exhibits low testosterone features so I am not surprised about that specific one. Questionable example.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/24 02:07 PM
2

That's because the average low testosterone man is still way above the 50 ng/dl level that most women have. Create a man with the same hormonal profile (testosterone, estrogen, progesterone, prolactin, dihydrotestosterone) as a female and see how he behaves. Men who have made the transition to women might be able to provide some insights.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/24 02:02 PM
-5

The hormonal differences are the main ones. Someone with 50 ng/dl testosterone is gonna act very differently than someone with 700 ng/dl testosterone. Rationality is usually inversely correlated with estrogen, hence why women aren't known for being big thinkers. With men's testosterone decreasing, the behavioral differences are becoming less pronounced.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/24 01:50 PM
1

Exactly.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/24 01:38 PM
1

Good for you. But I don't see how porn and video game usage correlates to good solo sex. On the contrary, if someone was really good at solo sex, they wouldn't waste their time on any of that. I also continue to see a lot of complaining on this forum and elsewhere so I allow myself to be skeptical of your claims.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/24 01:36 PM
1

Nailed it.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/24 01:32 PM
1

Ok well, I'm sure your solo sex is absolutely brilliant and every other male is the same. That's why we hear it praised all the time. I'm sure all the statistics pointing towards the average session lasting 5 minutes are bunk as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/24 01:27 PM
1

You don't see how what? Most porn is designed to get you off fast. I realize there are exceptions.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/24 01:22 PM
–

Please elaborate. Are you talking from experience?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/24 01:15 PM
1

As I said in another comment, the average man has no standards at all and would have sex with 80% of women out there, if given the chance. So no, sex does not imply that a woman is physically attractive. A relationship might. The cum dumpster threshold is extremely low. Try to go into a gay bar once and see how many guys there want to have sex with you. And then let me know if you feel validated and attractive afterwards.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/24 01:09 PM
4

Unfortunately, that craving for female companionship, affection and positive attention is wired so deep within the brain that our ancestors had not yet lost their gills when it became nature's way to ensure that reproduction happens. It's in our hormonal system, our brains, every other cell of us meat creatures and only men lacking that are extreme outliers blessed with whatever abnormal conditions that make them asexual. Let's not confuse being aromantic with being asexual. Those are two differ…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/24 02:37 AM
5

The average man would probably fuck 80% of women out there, if given the chance. So there's no way sex alone can be considered validation for women.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/24 12:31 AM
2

Porn makes it way harder to maintain ejaculatory control. This is why its typically counterproductive to good solo sex. Beginners need to be careful about it. It's probably way overused.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/24 12:05 AM
7

You're arguing that for most men, sex is more about validation, and less about pleasure. I'd probably agree with that. However, this raises some questions. A woman can easily find a man who wants to have sex with her. But can she easily find a man who actually desires her? Or do must guys just want to use her as a cum dumpster? Sex and desire/validation is a tricky one.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/24 12:00 AM
–

Yeah this is due to a hormone called dihydrotestosterone by the way.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/24 11:41 PM
3

You're a loser by definition if you try something and you fail it. If you fail at it repeatedly and never change anything you might even be called an idiot. This is not to imply that you are a loser. I was simply persuaded to share the definition with you.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/24 11:34 PM
–

Coming up on the appstore: Rizzter. A Tinder where you swipe left or right based on rizz. No pictures.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/24 11:01 PM
2

Good one. I'd consider myself a male feminist, but I don't see how this has anything to do with it. Solo sex is all about empowerment of the individual.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/24 10:51 PM
0

I knew this was gonna come up lol. Dw, it's just charts. Not NSFW. If you really paranoid, copy paste the links into Google with NSFW filter turned on.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/24 10:10 PM
-1

Pictures explain it best. Bad solo sex Decent solo sex Epic solo sex
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/24 10:07 PM
-1

Libido is not the problem. Solo sex being stigmatized is. If men were better at solo sex, they wouldn't place the same value on partnered sex. The average male solo sex session involves furiously jerking off for 5 minutes and then cumming. It's hilarious and pathetic at the same time.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/24 09:55 PM
–

Sure. If you talk to 1,000 people, one of them is gonna like you. It's not rocket science.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/24 09:43 PM
0

You know, it's like complaining that the prices in the supermarket are high. Yeah no shit. How about you do something about it then? Stop buying shit. Live frugally. Organize protests. Vote for someone else. But nah, too lazy for that, so complaining takes the lead, and we never get anywhere collectively.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/24 09:40 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter