| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Just saw this on Facebook and the comments disgusted me. Imagine if this was going around with the genders reversed?What rule did I break? The rules just say "Facebook posts must be done w/ screenshot & blanked names." | /r/MensRights | 04/06/15 01:50 AM |
| 0 | Women's rights activist Ayaan Hirsi Ali slams feminism's 'trivial BS': “We must reclaim and retake feminism from our fellow idiotic women.”Why would you do that to your child? | /r/MensRights | 26/11/14 03:50 AM |
| 1 | There's a 4 year old boy from Florida who has been court ordered in a landmark case to be circumcised, explicitly against his will. Please sign and share this petition to show the judge you disagree with his his decision. Let's give this kid his body back. [X-post r/Intactivists]It prevents HIV, other STDs, balanitis, and more. Yeah those countries with no circumcision like Sweden and Denmark have huge HIV and STD problems... oh wait. | /r/MensRights | 14/11/14 06:43 PM |
| 2 | Man gets hit in the face for trying to stop a woman attacking him... those double standardsThese things are always staged. Citation needed. | /r/MensRights | 11/07/13 08:01 PM |
| 16 | Man gets hit in the face for trying to stop a woman attacking him... those double standardsOh, good catch. I thought it was the producer (the woman who entered the room) who slapped him. | /r/MensRights | 11/07/13 03:39 PM |
| 14 | Man gets hit in the face for trying to stop a woman attacking him... those double standardsAnyone know who the woman at 0:34 was? It looks like it could be a producer of the show... why would she strike the man? | /r/MensRights | 11/07/13 03:31 PM |
| 2 | I was happy to see this on my FacebookWould it be cute if the genders were reversed? If not, why the double standard? | /r/MensRights | 23/06/13 02:11 AM |
| 6 | Solo Mother Blocks School's Day Of Male BondingFor some kids it is. | /r/MensRights | 02/06/13 06:42 PM |
| 1 | End misandry. End circumcision.I think this is an important point that people need to bring up more. Pretty much nobody decides willingly to get circumcised at 18 because of the supposed "health" or "cleanliness" benefits. If the pro-circumcision arguments were actually convincing, then adults all over the world would be choosing to get it done. Essentially the only way for circumcision to continue is to do it to unsuspecting babies who have no choice in the matter. | /r/MensRights | 25/03/13 06:30 PM |
| 1 | In my VERY up-to-date Psychology book:Psychology is firmly in the womens realm. That's not true. There are certainly more female undergrads, but the higher up you go it becomes more predominantly male. | /r/MensRights | 10/03/13 07:35 PM |
| 2 | 70 percent of Germans oppose new law legalizing religiously motivated circumcision (x-post from /r/worldnews)Circumcision is an unnecessary and retarded cosmetic surgery only practised by America and third world countries. Mutilating the dicks of babies has no health benefits and only existed to hinder sexual pleasure. Thankfully circumcision rates are falling every year. Soon the barbaric religious practice will be obsolete. | /r/MensRights | 29/12/12 09:03 AM |
| 1 | 70 percent of Germans oppose new law legalizing religiously motivated circumcision (x-post from /r/worldnews)You say circumcised dicks are more aesthetically appealing. Why is that a reason to circumcise babies? | /r/MensRights | 29/12/12 08:42 AM |
| 1 | 70 percent of Germans oppose new law legalizing religiously motivated circumcision (x-post from /r/worldnews)it's more aesthetically appealing Why does it matter how aesthetically appealing a baby's dick is? | /r/MensRights | 29/12/12 06:07 AM |
| 0 | 70 percent of Germans oppose new law legalizing religiously motivated circumcision (x-post from /r/worldnews)You're telling people to learn biology, while defending circumcision - a useless cosmetic surgery born out of religious superstition? Yeah, you sound like quite the biologist. | /r/MensRights | 29/12/12 06:04 AM |
| 1 | 70 percent of Germans oppose new law legalizing religiously motivated circumcision (x-post from /r/worldnews)Are you comparing those things to cutting a fucking part of their body off for no reason? | /r/MensRights | 29/12/12 06:01 AM |
| 3 | Male student gang raped by Muslim youth for cross-dressing because of initiation ritual. University's reaction: 'students shouldn't cross-dress anymore because it might provoke certain groups'. [X post from r/atheism]Accurately reporting the fact that Muslims committed a crime is "hating on Muslims"? | /r/MensRights | 29/11/12 03:22 AM |
| 1 | Norwegian party wants to ban religious male genital mutilationThe fuck? It is the exact definition of mutilation. It's cutting off a perfectly healthy, normal part of the human body. | /r/MensRights | 14/06/12 07:06 PM |
| 10 | Norwegian party wants to ban religious male genital mutilationSo you're not okay with parents feeding their kids certain food, but you're okay with mutilating their genitals without their consent? | /r/MensRights | 14/06/12 04:29 AM |
| 0 | Richard Dawkins on "It's offensive"Again, can you give a single example of Dawkins being a "smug prick"? | /r/MensRights | 26/04/12 10:45 PM |
| 2 | Richard Dawkins on "It's offensive"Could you give an example of Dawkins being a "smug prick"? | /r/MensRights | 26/04/12 06:42 PM |
| 1 | Could we start calling male circumcision "male genital mutilation" exclusively? Or even refer to it as "infant genital mutilation?"What do you disagree with? You are comparing a deformity (cleft lip) to a normal and natural part of the human body (foreskin). | /r/MensRights | 01/04/12 04:34 PM |
| 0 | Could we start calling male circumcision "male genital mutilation" exclusively? Or even refer to it as "infant genital mutilation?"Some people in this thread are no different than the victims of FGM who defend the practice. | /r/MensRights | 01/04/12 03:36 PM |
| 2 | Could we start calling male circumcision "male genital mutilation" exclusively? Or even refer to it as "infant genital mutilation?"Removing the clitoris removes an immense amount of feeling, I can assure you removing some foreskin does not How do you know this? You've never had the feeling of a foreskin to compare. You don't know what you're missing out on. | /r/MensRights | 01/04/12 03:35 PM |
| 1 | Could we start calling male circumcision "male genital mutilation" exclusively? Or even refer to it as "infant genital mutilation?"Now can you admit you were wrong and acknowledge anything he said in his argument? Nah, you'll just keep spouting your bullshit. | /r/MensRights | 01/04/12 03:32 PM |
| 0 | Could we start calling male circumcision "male genital mutilation" exclusively? Or even refer to it as "infant genital mutilation?"A cleft lip is something WRONG. Don't you see that? Foreskin is a normal part of the body that is supposed to be there. Cutting it off is dangerous, pointless, and barbaric. | /r/MensRights | 01/04/12 03:29 PM |
| 0 | Could we start calling male circumcision "male genital mutilation" exclusively? Or even refer to it as "infant genital mutilation?"Why would I be downvoted for arguing against male genital mutilation on fucking MEN'S RIGHTS? | /r/MensRights | 01/04/12 03:27 PM |
| 3 | Could we start calling male circumcision "male genital mutilation" exclusively? Or even refer to it as "infant genital mutilation?"Male circumcision is not mutilation of the male penis. The fuck? It is clearly mutilation. | /r/MensRights | 01/04/12 01:26 AM |
| 1 | Could we start calling male circumcision "male genital mutilation" exclusively? Or even refer to it as "infant genital mutilation?"Scumbag CptReynolds: Says he'll bow out of the thread Keeps posting in the thread | /r/MensRights | 01/04/12 01:15 AM |
| 0 | Could we start calling male circumcision "male genital mutilation" exclusively? Or even refer to it as "infant genital mutilation?"Huh? You said circumcision is basically plastic surgery. Getting your tonsils out is not plastic surgery. Why do you support plastic surgery (your words, not mine) on babies? | /r/MensRights | 01/04/12 01:14 AM |
| 2 | Could we start calling male circumcision "male genital mutilation" exclusively? Or even refer to it as "infant genital mutilation?"Because Reddit is predominantly American, there will always be butthurt circumcised guys here ready to defend their mutilation. It's similar to how victims of FGM support the practice. | /r/MensRights | 31/03/12 11:53 PM |
| 10 | Could we start calling male circumcision "male genital mutilation" exclusively? Or even refer to it as "infant genital mutilation?"It's like plastic surgery And you don't see an issue with non-consenting babies getting plastic surgery? | /r/MensRights | 31/03/12 07:03 PM |
| 8 | Could we start calling male circumcision "male genital mutilation" exclusively? Or even refer to it as "infant genital mutilation?"Doesn't matter. Both are infant genital mutilation without consent. | /r/MensRights | 31/03/12 07:02 PM |
| 6 | Could we start calling male circumcision "male genital mutilation" exclusively? Or even refer to it as "infant genital mutilation?"I'm circumcised and my dick works fine. How your dick works is totally irrelevant. You didn't consent and it was not your choice. Mutilating children without their consent is the issue. | /r/MensRights | 31/03/12 05:17 PM |
| 17 | What I immediately think whenever someone tries to argue that circumcision has health benefitsIf there were convincing health benefits to being circumcised, adults all over the world would be choosing to get it done. Think about it. If being circumcised actually resulted in a considerably healthier penis, that would be convincing enough for people to decide to get the operation done. The reality, however, is that no adult chooses to get circumcised after hearing these arguments. This is simply because there are no health benefits and I'm not sure why people keep trying their hardest to m… | /r/MensRights | 04/03/12 05:11 PM |
| 4 | Mind blowing double standardThat's not an argument. You'd also be doing fine with 3 fingers. That doesn't mean we should start cutting fingers off babies. | /r/MensRights | 25/02/12 09:38 PM |
| 5 | Mind blowing double standardPlease stop spreading misinformation. The foreskin is NOT unnecessary. | /r/MensRights | 25/02/12 09:09 PM |
| 4 | "I'm so glad I'm circumcised. It's true maybe I lose some feelings, but at least it doesn't look like a half inflated balloon." (152 upvotes)I've even seen the argument that they don't remember it or aren't aware of it being used That's the worst argument because it can be used to justify any form of mutilation. | /r/MensRights | 31/01/12 11:29 PM |
| 1 | I think it's pretty relevantIs it an issue when female genital mutilation continue because men prefer cut vaginas? | /r/MensRights | 14/12/11 11:27 PM |
| 38 | I think it's pretty relevantHere's a link to the thread I can't stand when girls will gladly dismiss a guy because his dick wasn't mutilated. Attitudes like hers are the reason male and female genital mutilation will continue to thrive. | /r/MensRights | 14/12/11 05:02 AM |
| 23 | A question about the circumcision debateit is up to personal choice And that's exactly where the issue is. A baby can't consent, so it's not personal choice. | /r/MensRights | 24/09/11 11:02 PM |
| 1 | My campus newspaper printed misandrist op-ed, I responded.You truly don't understand what a theory is in science. Both are theories. Evolution is an observed, proven fact and is the backbone of modern biology. | /r/MensRights | 16/03/11 09:11 PM |
| 1 | My campus newspaper printed misandrist op-ed, I responded.Do you realise a round earth is a theory? Gravity is a theory. Germs causing disease is a theory. Everything made of atoms is a theory. Evolution is a fact just as much as any of these things are a fact. | /r/MensRights | 16/03/11 04:33 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter