TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

DangNapoleon Archive

View 0 posts and 58 comments by DangNapoleon on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

WRONG https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/8eq74e/being_a_male_is_hard_in_the_air_force/dxxmqss/
/r/MensRights25/04/18 09:52 AM
0

They went back and edited their comment. Sure sign of an idiot and a coward. You did the exact same thing 15 min., prior to the above comment? Spell it out to me, what is it a sure sign off?
/r/MensRights25/04/18 09:50 AM
2

Why would you consider yourself such?
/r/MensRights25/04/18 09:46 AM
-6

From the pamphlet, it isn’t a single risk factor there are many. And just because one is present, doesn’t mean that there is a risk or that something will happen, as I see it. Another example, white men have the highest suicide rate in the world. Would say whiteness is a risk factor for depression? No, that makes no sense. There must be something else causing it. Well there would probably be other risk factors as well. Poverty, loneliness, stress, depression, obesity. ETC., Alone one might not b…
/r/MensRights25/04/18 09:44 AM
-4

Sure “coward and idiot”. LOL
/r/MensRights25/04/18 09:40 AM
-12

No I went back an edited it by adding a different example but the same premise. Everything that is edited is from the “Edit:” and in quotations. I didn’t remove anything. EDIT: Besides you did the same just 15 min ago LOL https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/8eq74e/being_a_male_is_hard_in_the_air_force/dxxmqss/
/r/MensRights25/04/18 09:36 AM
1

If 90% of all fatal car crashes was caused by or while speeding, do you think speeding would be a risk factor? Or was caused by alcohol, do you think alcohol would be a risk factor?
/r/MensRights25/04/18 09:25 AM
0

It’s not about blaming a sex, it’s about risk factors. There is a difference. So in an organisation, where 80%-90% are male, you think an equal amount of sexual assault is happening towards men and women?
/r/MensRights25/04/18 09:21 AM
11

No the far left support the ban. The progressives support it. Those who are against the ban, are the big established parties, who often sit in government, they are afraid to lose allies internationally. When the title says liberals, it is about the rulling parti “Venstre” which historically was liberal compared to the conservatives.
/r/MensRights25/04/18 09:16 AM
-1

So you think women commit more sexual assault or harassment than men in the military?
/r/MensRights25/04/18 09:11 AM
-5

I’m not sexist. If the vast majority of sexual violence is committed by males. Then being a male is a risk factor. How difficult is that to understand. You triggered SJW.
/r/MensRights25/04/18 09:09 AM
0

No, I don’t know what the % is, but if the military is 90% male then there probably will be an overrepresentation of men. and also the fact that men can commit sexual violence or advances towards other men. I don’t get triggered by the fact, that being a male is a risk factor for sexual assault, when it’s a organisation dominated by males.
/r/MensRights25/04/18 09:05 AM
-6

I don’t know what % it is, which isn’t the point. It might be 99%.
/r/MensRights25/04/18 08:57 AM
-27

If 90% of all sexual violence is committed by a male, then being male is a risk factor. Edit: let’s spell it out so the people in this echo chamber can understand it. If 90% of all fatal car crashes was caused by or while speeding, do you think speeding would be a risk factor? Or was caused by alcohol, do you think alcohol would be a risk factor?
/r/MensRights25/04/18 08:43 AM
15

Liberals in this (Danish) context means center right. The conservatives are against a ban as wel, within the governmentl. Together with the social democrats who is not in Government. Only Liberal Alliance far right parti with their economic polices support it with two more fringe parties on the left.
/r/MensRights25/04/18 07:59 AM
10

Timdoll Anyway I searched her on Twitter and from what I could gather it was a troll account.
/r/MensRights23/04/18 05:55 PM
33

She seems racist as well.
/r/MensRights23/04/18 03:21 PM
2

There shouldn’t be a draft for anyone.
/r/MensRights20/04/18 07:19 PM
6

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maggie_De_Block She is very fat. But it doesn’t disqualify her as a politican. In March 2013, she was voted woman of the year by readers of the francophone newspaper La Libre Belgique.[4] In 2013 and 2014 polls, she became the most popular Flemish politician, ahead of the Minister-President of Flanders Kris Peeters.[5] In the Michel Government formed in October 2014, she became Minister of Social Affairs and Health. When taking the oath, she described the portfolio …
/r/MGTOW20/12/17 04:26 PM
2

Why?
/r/MensRights13/12/17 03:38 PM
-2

How is it mutilation? It’s a figurative image. Of bursting a bubble?
/r/MensRights13/12/17 03:15 PM
0

Slow down there buddy, enough with the name calling, there is no reason for that. And I’m all for mens rights, but being disingenuous about it leads nowhere. for non-feminists to post in your sub I have no sub? I basically only visit this sub about social issues. Besides talk about the issue? Powerfull men are falling because a lot of mainly women are coming forth taking them down? How is that discriminatory against other men? Is it the dick symbol? It’s about powerful men and people in power ta…
/r/MensRights13/12/17 03:13 PM
-8

do take issue with the celebratory depiction of genital mutilation on a mainstream magazine cover Are we looking at the same picture? Are you talking about the needle and ballon dick?
/r/MensRights13/12/17 02:49 PM
-16

Shhh... you are busting the talking points and narrative of this sub.
/r/MensRights13/12/17 08:01 AM
1

The fact that women did not have a right to vote was a great injustice. The fact that men were drafted until 1970 was a greater injustice. Even though the Ideal of Equality was present from the beginning Yes the ideal of equality for some, for men with money, not poor people, not women, not minorities. The fact that women did not have a right to vote was a great injustice. The fact that men were drafted until 1970 was a greater injustice. Now I don’t think you can compare the two, but I don’t th…
/r/MensRights12/12/17 01:55 PM
1

What does that even mean? People at the time thought the Soviet Union had done most to defeat nazi Germany and they had suffered most causalities from them as well.
/r/MensRights12/12/17 10:46 AM
2

One of the founding principles of the United States is that All Humans are Created Equal. It wasn’t though in reality. During The Revolution, America defeated British Monarchy and proclaimed the principles of Freedom and Equality. It only ment freedom and equality for some people. There wasn’t freedom for women, native Americans or black people. Just look at the majority opinion of the Dred Scoot v. Sandford descion on how they interpreted “all men are created equal” https://youtu.be/znzyPlk4Zy4…
/r/MensRights12/12/17 10:41 AM
2

You too :)
/r/MensRights12/12/17 01:16 AM
0

Feminism having nothing to do with egalitarianism is a fact. No I disagree. Just like some people "believe" 1+1=2. False equivalency since that is math, where this is humanities or society, you can’t argue that it is the same as “math”. And of course women shouldn’t be forced to serve, just as men shouldn’t, making one wrong into two wrong doesn’t make it right. Armies should be full volunteer and professional.
/r/MensRights11/12/17 05:10 PM
3

Sure you can thank me too when my words sink in, now or years from now.
/r/MensRights11/12/17 03:02 PM
2

He is the one saying I’m deluding myself. So I consider that he startet the personal attacks. Besides it’s just a talking point he is echoing with no real life value than on the internet like forums like these. and yes I wont let other take the “badge” feminist and make it something else. From where I stand it’s about equality between the sexes, no matter that it is being used differently at other places.
/r/MensRights11/12/17 12:29 PM
1

No you are. Since you havn’t learned to think for yourself, but just follow like a pilot fish eating the scraps from more developed beings.
/r/MensRights11/12/17 10:43 AM
-2

No this modern form of feminist is something different. historically it has been about equal rights and duties for men and women alike. I won’t start calling it something else, just because some people believe it to be something different. Especially Americans who seems have have been hit by a cluster fuck of stupidity in your politics on colleges and in your national debates.
/r/MensRights11/12/17 10:42 AM
0

Sperm Donation: Conservatives Line Up Against Sperm Donors, But Lack The Power To Ban Them Though the center is not religiously affiliated, Lahl considers herself a “little’o’ Orthodox Christian,” and said faith can offer a strong basis for bioethical concerns. “I think it naturally aligns for people of faith because we’re concerned about the embryo and the unborn,” said Lahl, a registered nurse. “We’re concerned about the barren womb, and life issues, and justice.” Religious groups glom onto th…
/r/MensRights11/12/17 12:21 AM
0

Personal rights have never held back conservatives. Except for wealth and property. Personal rights are much more libertarian.
/r/MensRights11/12/17 12:09 AM
11

It should be banned, any parent caught doing a MGM on their child should be fined and or sent to jail even if they have it performed outside of national borders. The same with doctors or anyone who performs it on a resident in my country, IMO.
/r/MensRights11/12/17 12:06 AM
0

It is part of the whole “traditional family values” north Americans and conservatives alike love.
/r/MensRights11/12/17 12:01 AM
-3

lmao is not an argument.
/r/MensRights10/12/17 11:58 PM
1

Yes I understand that, but from the begining of this thread I was speaking from my Danish perspective. Meh it’s the laws that are bad. In Denmark you can donate anonymously and the recipients will never know who the biological father is. I find it very good that men can help others get children. But I agree that it could set a dangerous precedent for sperm-donor laws and that it removes legal certainty for men.
/r/MensRights10/12/17 11:53 PM
4

I consider myself a feminist and egalitarian and I absolutely support a ban on MGM as do people in the national debate on the issue where I’m from who are declared feminist and/or libertarian. Put I don’t know anything about that sub and my comment wasn’t about that sub.
/r/MensRights10/12/17 11:27 PM
4

No conservatives value “traditional family values” which anonymous donors contradicts especially if it has to be made available to gays, in the name of equality and non-discirimation laws. But yes anyone could put forth legislation that outlaw anonymous sperm donors, but I see this as very far fetched from where I’m from. Like not a single political party have that as part of their platform retroactively.
/r/MensRights10/12/17 11:20 PM
-4

Sure whatever makes you sleep at night.
/r/MensRights10/12/17 11:12 PM
1

Austraila is conserviate as fuck, just last month they legalized homosexual marriages. Jesus talk about being out back down under.
/r/MensRights10/12/17 09:08 PM
-1

As I said I only speak of where I’m from and in Denmark it would be a 180* political shift for this to happen. I don’t understand the concept of "Man raped? He must pay.” I still think that it’s the laws that should be changed. As sperm donation is a force for good for childless couples.
/r/MensRights10/12/17 09:06 PM
2

Yes, but what I ment was, that a law can’t remove the technology, people can still acces it, if they want to circumvent the system.
/r/MensRights10/12/17 08:37 PM
-6

Well I consider Canada much more conservative than Denmark. But of course I think men who consider donating sperm, should think about that possibility.
/r/MensRights10/12/17 08:01 PM
-3

But you might as well keep indoor and don’t go out if you are afraid of a political system going 180*. This is not something that is a political reality in Denmark. In other countries maybe, I don’t know.
/r/MensRights10/12/17 07:16 PM
-3

You can’t call every social conservative a racist.
/r/MensRights10/12/17 07:01 PM
3

Well you can’t legislate your way out of people gaming the system or outlaw DNA testing, people will always try to do stuff like that. Besides in most sperm donor cases everything goes well and just because there is a few horror stories or states with outlandish laws, that doesn’t mean that sperm donations as a concept is bad or that donors should be afraid.
/r/MensRights10/12/17 06:23 PM
3

Show me any statement where I defend the system? You can’t. You must really have your head stuck up your ass to continuos argue that someone has an opinion, when I keep on saying I don’t. And you don’t even have the brains to go through my comments and see that you are wrong and admit to it. Instead you cling on to your “but” argument which is hollow and without substance. I'm not defending the system, but. This is not even a quote by me. I just noticed you just took two different sentences and …
/r/MensRights10/12/17 06:04 PM
5

You havn’t shown a real argument of me defending the system except for semantics. It’s not a real argument you bring forth, just because I used the word but, as after the “but” I didn’t talk about the system I talked about the parents the two women. So again, show me where I defend the system or kindly stfu.
/r/MensRights10/12/17 05:57 PM
5

Do you have a real argument where I defend the system? Even though I say I’m not and that the law didn’t protect the donor?
/r/MensRights10/12/17 04:34 PM
-1

Well you need good laws defending your rights.
/r/MensRights10/12/17 03:28 PM
1

I’m not defending the system, I think it sounds like a fucked up case that never should have been brought. But in this situation, if the parents really wanted to protect the donor, they should have lied on who was the biological father. In the article it said they didn’t want his “child support”, if that was the case they shouldn’t have named him.
/r/MensRights10/12/17 02:24 PM
29

More like the law didn’t recongize a private agrement on parenthood and waiver of rights, since this is about the childs rights and the childs right for childsupport. The women should have lied on the paternity blanket thing and said that the donor was an unknown man from a drunk night out some years ago and was a blessing in disguise, but never said they knew who the father was. Because then the state wouldn’t have a biological father to pursue legally.
/r/MensRights10/12/17 01:43 PM
-30

Not sure why this blames feminist? Might as well have been a social conservative.
/r/MensRights10/12/17 01:29 PM
19

Meh it’s the laws that are bad. In Denmark you can donate anonymously and the recipients will never know who the biological father is. I find it very good that men can help others get children.
/r/MensRights10/12/17 01:25 PM
249

No the moral of the story is if you are gonna donate sperm, don’t do it privately go through proper channels, like doctors and sperm clinics, do not do it by a private agrement between you and the recipients since that grants you no or little legal protections.
/r/MensRights10/12/17 01:23 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter