TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

DaranSG Archive

View 1 posts and 73 comments by DaranSG on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
87

newsDaranSG/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/04/26 11:03 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-6

"modern militaries presume all men between the ages of approximately 18-45 (military fighting age) to be militant combatants." Even taking "all men" to refer just to men within the theatre who are members of the opposing population - which I think was your intent - this is a massive overstatement. A more defensible statement would be "modern militaries treat such men with greater suspicion than their female counterparts, and this sometimes veers into treating them as presumptive combatants".
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/07/26 01:49 PM
6

a lot of feminists fight for man's rights too (read the will to change by bell hooks if you need proof) I wanted to respond to this separately. In The Will to Change, bell hook attributes men's problems to "Patriarchy" which she defines as follows: Patriarchy is a political-social system that insists that males are inherently dominating, superior to everything and everyone deemed weak, especially females, and endowed with the right to dominate and rule over the weak and to maintain that dominanc…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/07/26 02:12 AM
3

I see a lot of people on this sub say things like "modern feminism is..", "feminism has become x..", "feminism doesn't care about men because..", and I think all this kind of comments are either sexist people trying to rationalise their sexism and discredit feminism, or people who genuinely wants good for both sexes and are misguided by mainly social media, that amplifies whatever keeps us more engaged, and that means also ignorant content that makes us feel anger. You are committing the fallacy…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/07/26 01:44 AM
-4

I think it is patriarchal. Yet as you point out women dominate men in some contexts. The conceptual problem isn't whether or not it is a patriarchal society. It's that the feminist definition of "patriarchy" doesn't accurately describe how these societies actually work.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/06/26 12:06 AM
-2

While Trump has never said "I hate women" to my knowledge, he has expressed bigotry and hatefulness toward them to such a degree that he ought to be ostracised from society. An it has got him into office, so I don't think the binary works quite like you said.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/06/26 11:56 PM
4

I have a close friend who gets the "we don't mean you, you're one of the good ones" treatment from some of her aquaintances, except that it's based upon race rather than gender. (She is of Indian ancestry.) How do you feel about that? Do you feel differently when its based on gender not race, and if so, why? With regard to Patriarchy, feminists define this as a society which puts men - half the worlds's adult population - in a position of dominance over the other half. Can you explain how, for e…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/06/26 11:49 PM
1

If my earlier comment has left anyone with the impression that I don't consider the way this legislation is gendered to be a huge problem, or that I don't consider the use of gendered pronouns to include the other sex to be a problem then it is a mistaken one. My point was narrow: It is a principle of statutory interpretation (codified in section 6 of the Interpretation Act 1978 https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1978/30/section/6 ) that both masculine and feminine pronouns include the other s…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/05/26 09:12 PM
1

"the Suffragettes movement was drugging and raping lil boys when new drugs were being discovered" Citation needed.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/05/26 02:10 AM
0

I've edited my comment to make my intended meaning clear. Don't read anything into the pronouns. Obviously, other gendered language, such as that you quoted is significant. "This definition is PERFECTLY CLEAR that it considers that ONLY men can commit the crime of rape because ONLY MEN (and Transwomen) have penises." But as I pointed out in my earlier comment, under British Criminal Law, accessories to a crime can be charged with the substantive offense - rape in this case - and not a lesser "ac…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/05/26 02:02 AM
1

"They were just indicted last month..." So was Comey... "...If you have ever worked with anything involving the federal and Alabama DOJ you would understand how long it takes..." ... less than a year since he posted the allegedly threatening image. "and how the political leaders influence which cases get worked on. The DOJ is not a bastion of truth and justice no matter which party controls it." But it has never so nakedly gone after people solely because they have opposed the President, and wit…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/05/26 01:48 AM
5

Yes.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/05/26 03:03 AM
-3

I wouldn't read anything into the gendered terminologypronouns. In UK legislation masculine pronouns are generally used to refer to people regardless of gender. Section 25(6)(c) refers to "A's anus or vagina" even though A is repeatedly referred to using the masculine pronouns. It cannot be taken as referring only to men's vaginas. Edited.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/05/26 02:54 AM
1

Not whataboutism at all. I really wish that researchers would always collect comparative data, even if the intention is to focus upon one gender. But it's understandable that they do not. In this case, the researchers used a high-quality convenience sample from Prolific, combined with a lower-quality one "recruited via community advertisements" https://pure.cumbria.ac.uk/ws/portalfiles/portal/15318373/Bates_PrevalenceOfMensAAM.pdf. To have recruited a similar number of female participants in the…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/05/26 02:37 AM
7

Farrell did some research into incest in which he interviewed 200 people who had indicated that they had had such relationships. What exactly is her objection? Does she allege that he is misreporting what his subjects told him? That would be serious academic fraud, and where is her evidence for that? If not, then her complaint is that he discovered something she doesn't like and reported it. This is not a serious objection. Contrast with de Beauvoir who absolutely did advocate for child sex.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/05/26 02:08 AM
3

https://www.reddit.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/comments/1qgp8bb/comment/o1ooc6l/ Unfortunately one of the links has rotted and a brief search did not turn up another freely accessible version of the paper. The sound recording is still good.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/05/26 01:59 AM
19

Posting this separately from my other reply because I don't want it to get lost. Feminists are the cause of this state of affairs. Unfortunately I can't prove this, as the relevant documents have disappeared from the web, last time I looked. Around the turn of the century, the UK government undertook a consultation exercise regarding the then forthcoming Sexual Offenses Bill which ultimately became the Sexual Offenses Act 2003. A document summarizing the result of that consultation was published…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/05/26 01:27 AM
-5

Substantially true, but technically false. The offense of rape is committed if the victim's vagina, anus, or mouth is penetrated by a penis, without the victim's consent or reasonable belief that the victim is consenting. However, there are at least one, and potentially a further two scenarios in which a woman might be convicted of rape, depending upon your views of what sex trans people "really" are. First under the theory of secondary liability, accessories to the act can be convicted of the s…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/05/26 12:58 AM
2

The SPLC's indictment was dated 26 April 2006 and there is no evidence they were ever under investigation prior to Trump's second term. Given that posting pictures of seashells is enough to get you indicted these days if Trump doesn't like you, I wouldn't read anything into this. "Nearly half a billon dollars" is a fair description of SPLC's assets at the time of Morris Dees departure (during or shortly before March 2019. https://www.splcenter.org/resources/stories/splc-statement-our-co-founder/…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/05/26 12:04 AM
2

They certainly do help many people, and they can continue to help them without my monthly subscription.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/05/26 12:31 AM
1

I'm an uncle, not a dad, and my sister and niece lived far away, so "what I did differently" was limited to my choice of birthday and Christmas presents for her. Initially, I had three unbreakable rules - no dolls, no clothes, no plastic. That forced me to be quite creative. I relaxed the "no plastic" rule when she became an older child. Generally I gave her the kinds of presents I liked when I was her age, so construction and science kits and the like. Also art activities, which I didn't partic…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/05/26 12:04 AM
1

If by "we" you mean us casual punters not in a position to do our own primary research and just trying to figure out what the hell is going on, you're absolutely right. Part of the problem is that there are so many partizan commentators. Feminists really, really, want the figures to be low, so they'll claim that the sources giving low figures are the most reliable. MRAs take the opposite stance. Worse, the partizanship infects academia itself, mainly on the feminist side - there aren't that many…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/04/26 07:50 AM
1

It's not the FBI that is "discovering" that an accusation is a lie, it is individual police departments labelling them so. They then report their figures to the FBI who do no independent investigation. There is no good reason to believe that all police departments are applying the FBI's criteria for unfounding rigourously, and plenty of reason to believe that some are not. My skepticism has nothing to do with whether I like or dislike a particular number. I'm skeptical of low numbers just as muc…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/04/26 01:35 AM
1

I didn't reference what Rumney actually says on the subject because, as I said, I didn't have time to reread it, In any case, I didn't cite to Rumney the claim that the figures did not change for year after year. My source is my own memory from researching this matter about 25 years ago. For the record, here's what Rumney says on the matter: "The FBI Uniform Crime Reports have shown an unfounding rate between 1966 and 1994 of 8%–20% for rape and between 2%–4% in other ‘‘index crimes’’ such as mu…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/04/26 12:51 AM
1

I didn't make any comment at all about your intelligence.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/04/26 12:26 AM
1

If you or anyone else wants a copy of Rumney and can't download one, pm me with an address and I'll email you a copy. As for the unchanging value of this statistic. Here's what the 1995 UCR report said: "In 1995, 8 percent of forcible rape complaints were “unfounded,” while the average for all Index crimes was 2 percent" 1996: "Eight percent of forcible rape complaints in 1996 were unfounded,” while the average for all Index crimes was 2 percent." 1997: "While the average of “unfounded” rates fo…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/04/26 12:23 AM
2

Works for me, though I do get a "verifying you're not a robot" message first. Perhaps it thinks you are one.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/04/26 11:56 PM
13

https://www.theguardian.com/law/2025/feb/12/andrew-malkinson-moj-ministry-justice-payout-wrongful-conviction He's received an interim payment, but I don't know if a final award has been made. Also the disgusting rule that required compensation recipients to pay the prison service for living expenses has been overturned and won't apply to him. Past exonerees won't be refunded.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/04/26 07:45 PM
3

Yes, those lowball figures are all garbage. Unfortunately so is that 8% figure, as I point out in my other comment. And unless some new research has been published in the several years since I last looked into the matter, so is every other published figure, high or low.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/04/26 12:07 PM
4

I don't believe that old UCR statistic. It didn't change, for year after year, not even by a single percentage point, which lead me to suspect that it was the same boilerplate included every year and not recalculated from then current data. In any case, its not a meta analysis, just an aggregation of reports from individual police departments with no central checking that they are correctly following procedure or applying the FBI's criteria. And there is a lot of evidence that many police depart…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/04/26 11:53 AM
48

Malkinson's 2023 address to her is worth quoting in full. The contrast between his kindness toward her, and her perfunctory acknowledgement of him could not be more stark. Whether he still feels as kind, now that he knows she had doubts all along, is another matter. "As this is my only chance to say something to her, please allow me to address her directly. Sitting in my prison cell, I used to wrack my brains as to how you could say you were so sure it was me when I knew it was not. I read all I…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/04/26 11:23 AM
1

Obvious to us. Not necessarily obvious to someone who has internalised the idea that feminism is just about equal rights for women and that disagreement with feminism implies opposition to equal rights.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/02/26 12:16 AM
1

I'll take the words in reverse order. Activism: The word is meaningless if there is no prospect of meaningful change. I long ago abandoned the belief that my words would change anyone's heart or mind, and so don't consider my online commentary to be activism. I am an activist in the real-world, though my efforts there are not focused on men. I participate in forums like this one to scratch an itch, nothing more. Rights: OK, I suppose as a synecdoche. Men have interests that are within the ambit …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/02/26 12:11 AM
1

How about "we are not women's enemy"?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/02/26 04:46 AM
1

I'll address the claim that she "went on to define them out of the definition of rape in the CDC's research" in a separate comment. That send me down a rabbithole of research, but the bottom line is that I have found no evidence that Koss has had any input into the CDC's decision not classify "made to penetrate" acts as rape. She wasn't on the relevant panels, nor was her work cited by them. Also the CDC's uniform defintions haven't defined rape at all, since at least 2002, long before the NISVS…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/01/26 06:18 AM
2

"But I think if you polled most people on benefits of being a man vs being a woman legally speaking the results would tend to skew one way than another." That most people think the benefits of being a man outweigh those of being a woman has more to do with the lifetime of propaganda that everyone has been subject to, in the West at least, telling them so. Most people do not think deeply about these matters.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/01/26 06:04 AM
2

Rough-sleeping is a subcategory of homelessness. It is the most severe and life- and health-threatening form, and therefore warrants a particular focus, but should never be treated as though it exhausts the topic. In the UK, about 15% of rough sleepers are female, according to government statistics. The 2023 Women's rough sleeping census report found over four times as many female rough-sleepers than did the government snapshot. There is no evidence of comparable undercounting for male rough-sle…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/01/26 05:52 AM
5

Grow_peace_in_Bedlam: I have legitimately no idea what [Tate's] appeal is Picture a teenage boy from a low social-economic background. He sees his female contemporaries doing better at school, prioritised over him at every turn. He wants to date girls but don't know how and find the whole experience brutal. He is also bullied and perhaps at risk of gang violence. The message from the left: "You're shit, your perspectives are invalid, you're privileged. You're a sexual predator. We need to end vi…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/01/26 12:31 AM
7

"I know you people only care for boys" This is absolute bollocks. "Do tell people that "carving svastikas on tables" is good" Straw man. They never said anything of the sort. "&normal" They said being edgy at that age is normal, meaning that it is commonplace and not indicative of abnormal psychosocial development. They're right about that. That doesn't mean that the behaviour is harmless, good, or even ok. For example, one child might carve a swastika, with the intent of provoking a response, b…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/01/26 11:57 PM
5

Hey, Nice_Purchase. Do you want to be taken seriously around here? Or are you just a troll? Because to me, right now, you look like a troll. And from the number of downvotes you're getting, I'm not the only one who thinks that. If you want a better response from folks here, stop strawmanning, stop the ad homs, and start addressing people's actual arguments.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/01/26 11:13 PM
4

"It’s like he was bio engineered in a lab to be the perfect strawman." Definitely going to steal that. Another good one, from Jimmy Carr: "Tate is a 14-year-old boy's idea of what a man is."
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/01/26 10:40 PM
6

ExternalGreen is a feminist radical anarcho-Marxist, which is about as far away from right-wing as it is possible to be.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/01/26 10:37 PM
2

I've read as much of it as I couldn't stomach, which wasn't much at all. Hilarious it was not. YMMV.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/01/26 05:46 AM
7

If I were to guess why, there’d be two reasons (note this isn’t an endorsement). Ok, I understand that you are proffering explanations, not justifications. For one, there’s a lot more material harm one way than there is the other. I understand you to mean there's a lot more material harm caused by men to women, than by women to men. One could make a case that there's a lot more material benefit delivered by men to women than by women to men. Every woman who lives and works in a warm, dry, clean …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/01/26 04:19 AM
10

"I'm female, and also a lesbian." I've never encountered a male one. "I try to push back on it." Thank you for doing that, and for being willing to pay the price for it. I'm sorry that you had to. "I've ... [been labeled] a "pick me," for defending men." Why on earth would a lesbian want men to pick her?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/01/26 03:45 AM
6

Last time I checked, most men are not presidents. What do you think the word "Patriarchy" means? By the way, I greatly appreciate you being here. It's extremely rare for feminists to attempt to defend their ideas in fora they do not control. I hope you will continue to engage.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/01/26 02:07 AM
1

"91% of middle-aged men who committed suicide were seeking professional help for problems in their lives, including 50% who were seeing a mental health specialist." Thanks for that. Actually "only" 35% had contact with mental health services. See figure 8 in the cited report. 52% of a subgroup - those who had had contact with some frontline agency within 3 months - had mental-health contact. Also, 18% had contact with Justice System services. I don't agree that getting arrested on a public order…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/01/26 01:16 AM
2

Can we please stop endlessly regurgitating unsourced unchecked factoids about feminists? Not that we're worse at this than anyone else, but we should do better, because everyone should do better. I'll fact check just one of them. Here's where Koss used the phrase "ambivalent about their sexual (sic. she actually used the word 'own') desires" We acknowledge the inappropriateness of female verbal coercion and the legitimacy of male perceptions that they have had unwanted sex. Although men may some…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/01/26 08:26 PM
2

"Today's feminist movement doesn't actually want to align itself with a more mature, logically rigorous, and gender-egalitarian position - even if that's truly what the academic feminists have to offer." That's not my impression of academic feminism. Feel free to cite any you think fit this description.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/01/26 01:51 AM
6

My last GF told me that the reason she chose to date her violently-abusive ex was because she thought he would protect her. I'm not sure who she thought she needed protection from.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/01/26 01:28 AM
3

You can't cater for everyone in a single movie. It ought to be possible to cater for everyone in an entire industry.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/01/26 01:22 AM
1

In what way does anyone "have to" cater for anyone? All we're doing is discussing the issue. It's entirely up to media creators whether and if so, how to respond to any particular criticism, and to consumers to decide whether or not to pay for the product they create. It's a free market.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/01/26 01:16 AM
4

Fantasy dwarfs (eg Gimli) are not representation of anyone. Human dwarf characters (eg Tyrion, Gary in the Joker Movies) are representation for human dwarfs. Male characters who aren't dwarfs, but who are just short - are representation for short men who aren't dwarfs. Any character played by Danny DiVito, for example.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/01/26 01:02 AM
2

Book Gimli is a doughty warrior equal to Legolas. Film Gimli was mostly the comic short guy, always playing second fiddle to Legolas. These are two very different characters.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/01/26 11:56 PM
1

"Women ... out earn men (if you exclude the top 1%)" Citation needed. According to the BLS, median (i.e, 50th percentile) full-time earnings of women were 85% of men. Excluding the top 1% of earners would be equivalent to moving to the 49.5th percentile. It would be unlikely to the point of being an extraordinary claim requiring extraordinary evidence for the disparity to reverse with such a tiny change in the percentile. https://www.bls.gov/opub/ted/2024/womens-earnings-were-83-6-percent-of-men…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/01/26 06:59 PM
1

Just to be clear, the Guardian did not admit that the Guardian demonised and erased male refugees. This is an opinion piece by an individual. In context "we" means "progressives, broadly", and the author in particular, not the Guardian. It's a good piece, not perfect, but I'm glad she wrote it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/01/26 06:40 PM
4

I'm skeptical. It claims to be "a group of life-long feminists", but the only person listed on the about page is Dr. F. Persia Jamshidi. Is anyone else involved or is it a one-woman band? ChatGPT has been unable to verify Jamshidi's claimed qualifications or find any public research or academic footprint. All the information available about her seems to have come from her. This doesn't prove she's bogus. First ChatGPT is notoriously unreliable. The footprint might be there, just ChatGPT didn't f…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/01/26 01:59 AM
2

"Research shows that the majority of men of who commit suicide reach out for help before they kill themselves." Citation Please. Research does show that less than half of men who suicide have had contact with mental health services in their lifetime, and only 35% within a year. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5072576/
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/01/26 01:37 AM
9

"I realise being totally alone is worse" Not for everyone. Some of us like being alone.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/01/26 11:25 PM
2

21:00 "Shame is how our brains tell us we're doing something that will harm us." No, shame is an emotion we feel when we believe, correctly or incorrectly, that others disapprove.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/09/25 12:55 AM
7

Hello Robot_Was_BMO, welcome to LWMA. " I can’t imagine there’s a woman in here" Why not? This subreddit is not a cess-pool of misogyny and there are many women who share its values. Why should they not hang out here? In fact, I've seen several people commenting who either use feminine names or explicitly have indicated that they are female, and I'm not particularly active here. They're not hard to find. "I’m clear-sighted enough to see that objectively we live in a patriarchy." What exactly do …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/09/25 05:50 PM
2

"Majority of victims of violent crimes are men" Coincidentally I just found this: https://counciloncj.org/criminal-justice-gaps-between-women-and-men-narrow-on-violence-other-key-meaures/ The lede is "WASHINGTON – Women are now just as likely as men to be victims of violent crime..." How did they come up with that? About half way down the page they say "Females report that they make up a larger share of violent crime victims: 51% of all violent victimizations in 2022 compared to 41% of all victi…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/09/25 05:18 AM
2

"Women can't walk down the street safely at night because of men." They can go to bed with a roof over their heads, because men worked outside in all weathers building it. Their homes are not buried in a midden of their own creation, because men regularly come by to cart away their refuse. Their toilets are not overflowing with sewage, because men maintain the sewers. Men keep the lights on. Men keep the heating going. And when they go online tell the world how terrible men are, they use a commu…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/09/25 05:10 AM
14

"I'm often told by friends that they "hate all men ...They expect me to join in when they talk about how much they hate straight men or mock their loneliness and mental health." You need to find better friends. /None/ of my friends have ever said or expected anything like this. One problem with the word "misandry" is that it can mean everything from foaming-at-the-mouth man-hatred to casual every-day sexism against men. The latter is ubiquitous and cannot be avoided. The former isn't. If that's …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/07/25 07:40 PM
2

The claim in the post is that "VAM still being counted as VAW under the VAWA act." Which I think most people would take to refer to the US law by that name, though other countries may have similarly named legislation. There is no such act in the UK. The issue in the UK is that incidents of sexual assault and domestic violence where men and boys are victims are included within figures for VAWAG by the Office for National Statistics, and in their first report on the topic, there was no mention of …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/07/25 10:14 PM
22

"...women are disproportionately victims of GBV globally..." This is stated as though it were a contingent fact about the world. The problem is that GBV is defined as "violence that is directed against a woman because she is a woman or that affects women disproportionately." https://www.refworld.org/legal/resolution/cedaw/1992/en/96542 It will come as no surprise to anyone that women are disproportionately victims of violence that affects women disproportionately. This is not a contingent fact. …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/07/25 09:53 PM
10

It took me years to understand that I was a victim of domestic violence, even though she had punched me as hard as she could. I had never heard of male victimisation or female perpetration. DV was called "male violence against women", so I had no conceptual framework into which my experience fit.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/07/25 01:01 AM
8

For example, let's take your first talking point: "The media as man-hating." I don't know of anyone who has ever argued that there is anything distinctively misandrist about the boardrooms and offices of Media companies. The claim is about the /content/ of media. Everything you said in this section about media ownership and control is irrelevant, unless you're trying to smuggle in an unstated premise to the effect that male controlled institutions can't be misandrist. Nobody here will accept tha…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/07/25 12:14 AM
1

"god, what a creep full of himself." If content-free insults are typical of your posts, then I'm not surprised he blocked you.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/07/25 11:00 PM
7

Hello Michael. Thanks for posting and being willing to look at people's commentary. It's quite unusual, in my experience, for feminists to actually engage with critics, and even more rare for them to do so in a space controlled by the latter. Who did you write this piece for, and who do you think is likely to be convinced by it? I ask, because I think it is likely to be quite convincing to people who already accept feminist ideology. Those looking for a response to an MRA talking point will like…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/07/25 10:56 PM
5

That's a good summary - and I profoundly disagree. Women should have no obligation toward men, nor men toward women, other than the obligations that every person has toward every other person.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/07/25 11:55 PM
12

No, it's not all. The sign also uses the "male violence against women" framing which blames half the world's adult population for what most men do not do, erases male victims and female perpetrators of these kinds of violence, and, when translated into public policy, causes catastrophic harm to those victims. https://clok.uclan.ac.uk/id/eprint/51321/7/The%20Survivorship%20Experiences%20of%20Men%20and%20Boys%20of%20Crimes%20Currently%20Categorised%20by%20the%20Government%20as%20Crimes%20of%20Viol…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/07/25 11:32 PM
14

Yes. My obligation to women is the same as my obligation to other men, is the same as women's and other men's obligation to me - to not be a danger. Anything beyond that is a choice, and if for the benefit of a woman, it is a choice I make in spite of, and not because of, the obnoxious demands of entitled feminists.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/07/25 11:05 PM
6

Dear members of the gender most likely to be violently victimised. We don't give a shit about that or about you, but we'd still like you to do something about the /relatively/ small amount of violence suffered by the gender least likely to suffer it, the only gender we care about. Sincerely Feminists.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/07/25 10:43 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter