TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

DarkLorde117 Archive

View 0 posts and 206 comments by DarkLorde117 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Just send them all to Elliot Hulse lmao.
/r/MensRights30/04/19 04:21 AM
2

Also sometimes the ways in which men express their sadness/anger/frustration reach out, as well as the ways in which their friends offer support and solidarity, are FAR more subtle and intuitive than the "feminine" way of doing things. The way we reach out to each other for help with projects for example. If my boy is building up a new car to take a long roadtrip I'll figure there's something on his mind to make him need to get out of town for a few days. I'll send him off with a smile, after sp…
/r/MensRights30/04/19 04:20 AM
7

Welcome to dating apps. The best advice I have is to just not date. If you find someone special and feel a connection go for it, but don't search for it. People that look for relationships overwhelmingly find bad ones.
/r/ExRedPill17/04/19 08:31 PM
8

I know it’s a hookup app, Exactly. but because it’s mainstream people will be looking to date in there as well. It's a mainstream hookup app. Not a mainstream dating app.
/r/ExRedPill17/04/19 05:05 AM
2

Agreed, though possibly not according to the laws of the time and definitely not comparable to the severity of Cosby's crimes. The only grievance I have is this insistence that Cardi's crimes aren't just seen to stand on their own horrors and instead are seen as some political scandal.
/r/MensRights28/03/19 12:49 AM
-9

Speaking legally, requirements for constant consent throughout sex weren't in law back then iirc.
/r/MensRights27/03/19 11:34 PM
-10

Robbery aside, nothing Smith did implies lack or withdrawal of consent. I'm not saying Cardi B isn't a terrible person who deserves whatever misfortune comes her way, but there are many courts that would not consider that to be rape, male or female. It seems pretty ridiculous for us to constantly talk shit about premature judgement of men's crimes and then do the exact same thing when it's a women under fire
/r/MensRights27/03/19 11:30 PM
20

Oh it's absolutely criminal and she's 100% deserving of incredibly severe consequences, I'm just seeing a lot of people compare her to Cosby and others that don't really fit her MO in the slightest and it's a bit annoying.
/r/MensRights27/03/19 11:10 PM
24

In context, the story sounds like she would drug them AFTER they consented, not before. Hell I'm not even sure she slept with all of them. After they were fucked up it would usually just be easier to take their stuff and leave immediately.
/r/MensRights27/03/19 11:04 PM
73

Tbh it sounds like this very rarely had anything to do with rape. Just deceit and theft. Victims were willing to fuck which is how they were drawn in.
/r/MensRights27/03/19 09:31 PM
2

The issue with/ combatting TRP is that it actually works for all the wrong reasons. All the tricks get results much faster and easier than "just being yourself" and it's so difficult to find a legitimate, working relationship on the other side. It's like the knock-off Rolex where nobody can tell the difference until they have a real one. But when you find something real, it's worth it. Just because this relationship didn't work out doesn't mean you should stop looking for one that will.
/r/ExRedPill27/03/19 08:57 PM
4

I'm in this boat. There's a difference between being left-wing and being disconnected from reality. I describe them as "the left" and "The internet left."
/r/MensRights11/03/19 01:01 PM
2

You can get bone extensions for 10k per bone if it tickles your fancy. You'd also have to be a retard to care.
/r/MensRights07/03/19 12:15 AM
4

how hard his life was because of obstacles in his way. Obstacles are a fact of life. This reminds me of that quote (Bruce Lee I think?) about wishing not for an easy life, but for the strength to make do in a hard one.
/r/MensRights07/03/19 12:13 AM
3

It'll carry you an incredibly long way. Just make sure that when it finally lets you down to your feet, you find you've been going in the right direction.
/r/MensRights07/03/19 12:08 AM
3

Our culture doesn't support or endorse this behaviour and aside from the threat of divorce-court, husband absolutely has the option to leave. Personally I don't think using the single, absolutely extreme case is a great way to make a case for the general state of affairs for most men. I think there are better examples out there to show men's typical issues in marriage and relationships on a more relatable level.
/r/MensRights28/02/19 10:23 AM
35

"I would like you to explain your opinion, please." "Ignoring our issues is absolutely abhorrent. How dare you?" "I'm not ignoring your issues. I want you to explain them to me." "Sexist pig, smh."
/r/PussyPassDenied03/02/19 11:13 PM
67

Young men have spent a long time being told that they're monsters and should be guilty over their success. It's no wonder. I agree with the message behind the ad but the way it was presented is pathetically bad. The women who directed and produced it clearly had no interest or understanding of the male experience. It's possible to bring men up without putting responsibility to the innocent masses for the crimes of the few. Would have been a far more successful as if it focused on the positive mo…
/r/MensRights19/01/19 08:38 AM
1

Would be good to see mods get a little tighter with what actually fits the bill around here.
/r/MensRights27/12/18 08:07 AM
1

A lot of rural communities are still decades behind. There's enough voters out there that the right ideas need to leak through before there's a strong enough voterbase for the ideas to stand without pressure from the movement. That being said, a lot of mainstream commentators have been shooting themselves in the foot, so maybe we're better off letting it be.
/r/MensRights09/12/18 11:49 AM
0

This issue is that the article only discusses cases where men were fined for violations. It's quite clear that they're fined far more often than women, but to actually draw a definite conclusion from data, we need to know the total number of code violations for each sex, controlled for playtime, and THEN comparing the rates at which they are punish. ​ If men get ~600 punishments for ~1000 violations of racket abuse and women get ~99 punishments for ~120 violations, men are still getting off the …
/r/MensRights19/09/18 12:34 PM
3

Any movement that becomes an ideology has become too far. An MRA that considers themselves one for the sake of being an MRA, rather than actually undertaking activism for the sake of helping men and boys, is a shit MRA, and should rethink the label. Having toxic arguments with salty SJWs on Twitter doesn't make you an MRA. I don't label myself one because I've never done something to actually help the movement. If you want to call yourself an activist, let's see some productive action.
/r/MensRights19/09/18 12:18 PM
-2

It looked to me like he was just trying to figure out which of them was in the kiss-cam with him. Though I definitely agree the first women was way too forward. Unless of course, she knew him. Seems likely at least one of them did.
/r/MensRights17/09/18 09:39 AM
-6

This case doesn't bother me because the kid clearly isn't at all bothered. If one of these women had grabbed him when he was clearly, seriously uncomfortable it would be atrocious. Though I agree even I'd feel a lot different if it were a bunch of men and a young girl. I'd find it awful even if she seemed to take it in stride. Probably because women very rarely present themselves as an immediate physical threat. Even though they're all capable of overpowering the kid, a bunch of full-grown men w…
/r/MensRights17/09/18 09:26 AM
1

Gonna get fixed in under a week and that person's gonna lose their job. Then all the SJWs gonna boycott instead but all the same.
/r/MGTOW08/09/18 11:20 PM
1

You're completely derailing the topic. I'm not arguing about Ghandi's moral righteousness. I'm arguing for the right way to approach tense gender relations at the present day. Cut the bullshit.
/r/MensRights28/08/18 07:15 AM
1

Violence beats cowardice, but it isn't cowardly to treat people like human beings and try to reach an understanding. Y'all are reaching. Violence is an appropriate reaction to say, absolute tyranny. We're not being tyrannized. Maybe we're being treated poorly in a lot of respects but there's plenty of opportunity for that to change.
/r/MensRights28/08/18 07:07 AM
1

My entire point is that we shouldn't control any of these responsibilities by labeling them as gendered and let men and women sort themselves as they will without quotas. Individual pursuit of one's strengths is the way forward. This is neither gender-balanced nor a problem. It will result in an inequitable, but fair, society. We actually agree. I think you may have misunderstood my position.
/r/MensRights28/08/18 06:39 AM
1

That's completely beside the point of my statement, and the most gargantuan load of crap I've seen all day. Ghandi's approach to resolving conflict was patience, pacifism and understanding. Those are the traits I'm suggesting we learn from when we engage with these people. Not that we embrace his entire philosophy, because there was a lot wrong with it.
/r/MensRights28/08/18 06:37 AM
1

Absolutely, I appreciate that and agree I'm in the same cohort. All we can do is try to find our way out. :)
/r/MensRights28/08/18 02:22 AM
3

It's misinformation, as far as I can tell. They legitimately believe that MRAs have little-to-no distinction from incels. The solution to this is education, not aggression.
/r/MensRights28/08/18 01:20 AM
2

In his defense, he likely has spent much of the last several years arguing points around philosophy and psychology with people who had no business discussing either. 100%. We as a species would solve most of our problems a lot faster if people would just stay out of matters they didn't understand, at least until they took the effort to learn them.
/r/MensRights28/08/18 12:49 AM
1

As far as I can tell this is correct. I can't really see how it's at all relevant to the discussion.
/r/MensRights28/08/18 12:47 AM
2

The main criticism is that when he reaches across domains, he maintains that his expertise as a clinical psychologist justifies the conclusions he reaches. This is quite often an unreasonable claim. His philosophical musings should be able to stand on their own, and plenty of them do. He clearly preaches Hellenism. Specifically, Hellenistic Stoicism. These ideas have been around for thousands of years and are still contended and for the most part, believable. That would be a very compelling argu…
/r/MensRights27/08/18 04:59 PM
0

These studies compare kids with a father and a mother to kids with just a mother. None of these studies compare to kids with two mothers. Without evidence, I believe it to be absolutely true that kids need a certain amount of exposure to masculine energy/masculine guidence. The thing is, women can provide that as well. In the majority of cases, women are more feminine than masculine and won't be helpful here, but there are plenty of cases where that's not the case. Anecdotally, most successful s…
/r/MensRights27/08/18 04:48 PM
0

They've never been systematically gendered, or defined by specific quotas. They've been based purely on merit and preference, with blurred lines and a fair amount of overlap. That's the difference between now and then, and it's a significant one. ​ If we stopped with men and women, and started with people, this would all blow over a lot smoother.
/r/MensRights27/08/18 04:19 PM
2

As has been said above, the bloke is suffering from prostate cancer. A lot of the symptoms involve pain in the groin/crotch/buttocks. If the man took even one glance over there, while massaging or adjusting himself, he could easily be seen as a perv. Article is too fuzy on the details for us to draw conclusions. It's the staff who should draw most of the fire. After a handful of complaints, they kick him out without so much as a warning? Or attempt at clarification? Absolutely shameful behavior …
/r/MensRights27/08/18 03:22 PM
0

That's a pretty dismal way of looking at things. We can't reach these people because they think we're assholes. If we act like assholes, they'll confirm their beliefs and go TFG. If we can show some respect and decency, and open communication before that happens, we have a shot. It's all this bitterness about women's movement, and no acknowledgement about the base premise, that's making it so hard for men's issues to break into the discussion. Most women still see feminism as the embodiment of e…
/r/MensRights27/08/18 03:19 PM
1

Absolutely. There's several reasons the customers could have reasonably assumed he was being a pervert. It's the staff that should be drawing fire. A handful of complaints about some elderly bloke and they kick him out without so much as talking to him? No heads up? Absolutely shameful behavior.
/r/MensRights27/08/18 03:16 PM
2

No, that's fair and I'm the same. You're asking them to take time to get to know you and there's no way to know if they're equally interested, so I go the way of assuming that I should repay them for potentially giving me a shot they weren't too interested in. I dunno if that's a very realistic idea, but it feels pretty reasonable for me.
/r/MensRights22/05/18 06:47 AM
2

And none of those benefits being pushed on them because they're running this oppression narrative and developing learned helplessness. Every time you shit on them, that narrative runs a little deeper. The point is that they feel that they'll never be able to raise their quality of life high enough for it to be worth trying in the first place. All you need is a few people within that community that can show them it's possible, and with any luck they'll start to see things they can do to live a be…
/r/MensRights29/04/18 11:02 PM
1

I'm not excusing shit. I'm saying that it's moronic and close-minded to expect them to change when changing brings them no perceived benefit. The obvious solution to this is to make benefits tangible somehow. Is that really such a difficult concept?
/r/MensRights29/04/18 11:33 AM
5

That's a really awkward statement to make. On the surface, you're absolutely right. However that's a terrible statement to make without addressing the reasons behind it, because there's so many ways it can go. And leaving something like that to the imagination is a very bad idea. Might be important to mention the association between relative disparities (blacks and much poorer and less educated on average, not all of that is their fault) and crime, STDs and single parenthood. It defeats the purp…
/r/MensRights29/04/18 04:18 AM
4

It's almost certainly true that it's happening more often. I find that easy to believe. However I still suspect it's unlikely overall. Maybe even less than 1%. Unless your relationship is already obviously abusive, I very much doubt you'll have to worry about it.
/r/MensRights29/04/18 04:11 AM
60

It's absolute bullshit. "It's just a pregnancy" will never be a fair statement in any context. If it was "just a pregnancy," it would END WITH PREGNANCY. NO. THAT IS 18 YEARS OF YOUR LIFE. And they need to be tailored specifically to the fact that you have a kid now. They're gonna take up almost all of your responsibility and time for at least half of that period. And there won't be a single moment of the day that is guarenteed you won't have to deal with their shit. She clearly has no sense of …
/r/MensRights29/04/18 04:09 AM
-6

If you say so... Just remember you'll always see what you're looking for.
/r/MGTOW20/04/18 06:34 AM
-7

Pretty much. There's no point judging people by the word because it can mean almost anything about their beliefs or character.
/r/MGTOW19/04/18 11:50 PM
-2

NAWALT. You've only had the misfortune of getting close to ones that are, or you've forgotten the ones that aren't. You're right and I think that it's wrong to define Feminism as a movement for equality as a whole when they focus on women. I don't think it's malicious for someone to believe what they're told if nobody's told them otherwise. And I don't even know if this girl has. Maybe try debating her, or someone else, with actual statistics on women or feminists so your arguement stands? Oh wa…
/r/MGTOW19/04/18 01:21 AM
-5

Not saying she's right, wrong or reasonable. She didn't actually say anything about what she thinks, or even if she thinks. I prefer to judge people after they actually do something. And am I wrong to say that the term 'feminist' changes definition with every person you ask? Because I don't think I am.
/r/MGTOW19/04/18 12:50 AM
-5

I disagree. She's a feminist for sure. She's just not your definition of a feminist. She's also doesn't identify as the same type of feminist as other feminists. That's the problem with the term. There's no widely accepted definition anymore and you can basically use it however you want.
/r/MGTOW18/04/18 11:58 PM
5

Court cases should be completely anon until the case is clear, and only made public in the event that all parties (defendents and accusors) agree. All this 'facts are a choice' bullshit's getting in the way of due process. It's pathological to the core. Even when the defendent is actually guilty it does no good to say anything about it until they've had a fair trial. SJWs tryna play judge and jury here.
/r/MensRights28/03/18 08:54 PM
1

To be honest I do get a feeling that you're baiting a fight there. If the original post was primarily about sexual assault, then it primarily concerns women, though not all men are predetors and that women's got some thinking to do, I don't think it's justified to confront her if it means derailing the topic at hand. If it's just about victims of crime and excludes men I'd have a problem.
/r/MensRights28/03/18 08:51 PM
1

As a none-MGTOW who checks this place out every now and then to get the full story (I like a lot of the principles and don't plan on a typical family life but don't judge women as harshly as y'all), it's because everyone loves a good echo-chamber. And y'all are some of the few who don't give a shit about disrupting it.
/r/MGTOW02/03/18 01:12 AM
9

I call everyone bro. I call my mother bro. I've called my girlfriend bro. Never met someone that has a problem with it; probably lucky for me.
/r/MGTOW02/03/18 01:05 AM
3

I mean, it was more like 1.5 vs 1. I don't recall Scachi Koul putting up much of a fight. All I saw was the typical "backlash against feminism" and "straight, white men are all powerful" arguements we've seen before. She's justified in believing both of those things due to what she's seen of the MRA and feminism, but all the same, they're hardly troublesome arguements anymore, at least in the context of a debate.
/r/MensRights31/12/17 06:22 AM
6

They're very much a hate sub. The entire point is ripping on trans people and feminists that suppport them + anyone who gets in the way (including men). I was banned from there about a year ago. One of my prouder moments tbh.
/r/MensRights19/11/17 10:05 PM
2

To be fair these were two different people. Generalizing saves time at the expense of the truth, my guy.
/r/MensRights19/11/17 09:53 PM
2

Complete bullshit to be honest. We aren't homogenous fellas. I was flirting with the girl I hope to date soon within two weeks of my breakup in a serious (though only a year) relationship; over the ex within a week.
/r/MGTOW15/11/17 11:05 PM
1

I'd be inclined to agree with that. And their hatred is helping us because the feminist extremists seem to be loosing sympathy and the more they scream about how evil we are the more people actually check us out. I'm happy with that dynamic. It's the reasonable people I'm worried about.
/r/MensRights14/11/17 10:14 PM
1

You are absolutely right. Toxic perception of the MRM was not caused by MRAs. I'm not saying it was. I'm saying that this continued toxic perception of the MRM can be prevented by MRAs if we take serious steps to seperate ourselves from these groups. Our name's already slandered so much it'll probably be difficult to undo any damage but it's worth a shot. Activism is a lot easier when people don't hate your guts. And maliciousness is not the only explanation. I'm willing to bet that a large numb…
/r/MensRights14/11/17 10:08 PM
2

"I don't believe we're by-and-large discrimintated against by women." I should rephrase. I believe there are unconscious discrepencies between the way men and women are viewed. In many of those cases we're left worse off. In many cases women are left worse off as well, though we're far more aware of those as a society. But generally yes, gynocentrism seems to be pretty well supported. I just don't really define that as discrimination because it's not a conscious thing. I feel like accusing anyon…
/r/MensRights14/11/17 10:01 PM
1

The Red Pill doco came a while after the MRM. We were hated before the film came out because of the reasons I listed. People are given as unrealistic impression of the MRM by it's more toxic advocates. Just as we regularly interact with the more toxic advocates of feminism. There are many feminists I've talked to who actually disagree with a fairly large chunk of feminist rhetoric, which is rather confusing to be honest, but they just haven't heard it before because they don't have enough time i…
/r/MensRights14/11/17 09:12 PM
2

I consider myself a part of the MRM and absolutely agree that we're not a bigoted group. What I'm trying to explain is that this isn't an idea that's really being communicated with the outside world, which I'd hope you'd realize seeing as we've been labeled as a hategroup all throughout the mainstream. The only cases of "MRAs" actually interacting outside of thier own circles to a large degree that I'm aware of (that are discussed to any decent degree) aren't actually MRAs at all, and convince e…
/r/MensRights14/11/17 08:47 PM
2

Tough. We have no mainstream media access and no access to feminist-driven platforms on gender equality. Meaning that when a rather rude incel comes forward, starts slinging shit, and claims to be an MRA, people believe them. That's why MRAs are considered a hate-group, because the only interactions these people have had with self-declared MRAs have been hateful and bigoted. Should we not be talking about this? Should we not be doing something about this? Or would you rather the movement never f…
/r/MensRights14/11/17 07:43 PM
1

They don't get our endorsement and publication. But seeing as we get zero media coverage they haven't been seperated from us either. Why do you think everyone thinks MRAs are evil? Because they associate us with the incels, MGTOW and redpillers that claim to be a part of the movement. Should we not be talking about that and seperating ourselves from their idiologues? Because it's killing the movement.
/r/MensRights14/11/17 07:41 PM
1

I never said they were incorrect either, though I believe they are. There's plenty of cases in which individual women threaten a man's livelihood. There's no great trend accross the country that I'm aware of; especially seeing as the large majority of divorces are settled without going to court. Men are definitely discriminated against by the court system. I don't believe we're by-and-large discrimintated against by women. Though feminism is a different case...
/r/MensRights14/11/17 07:38 PM
0

He didn't oppose any of those things mate. Most of the next comments down did but I don't see why you'd drop that shit here.
/r/MensRights14/11/17 05:54 AM
4

A fairly large chunk of MGTOW consider themselves men's rights advocates. As do incels. Both groups are also very quick to say that women are both intellectually and physically inferior to men while the former isn't provably true and the later has been considered redundant for years. Both also claim that women as a demographic are an inherrent threat. Incels claim they're a psychological threat that manipulate and abuse while MGTOW claim they threaten livelihood. I don't have any links but I've …
/r/MensRights14/11/17 05:52 AM
0

Try not advocating castration and rape and you should do just fine. Incels are a disaster. Hopefully MGTOW isn't, but I lose hope every day.
/r/MGTOW08/11/17 06:46 AM
8

I do believe that the feminist movement deserves more open criticism and discussion than it's getting and take issue with some aspects of it; though I don't believe it's inherrently bad but rather inherrently positive. I've also been told that I'm a "biological essentialist" which is to say I believe there are innate differences between men and women that explain some differences in some areas to some degree. I've heard this idea floating around the MRM that men are generally superior which is q…
/r/ExRedPill06/11/17 04:11 AM
1

The right step in the wrong direction. Just abolish the draft completely ffs.
/r/MGTOW28/10/17 10:09 PM
8

Disgusting? No. Double standard? Sure.
/r/MensRights28/10/17 09:12 AM
4

Translation: It's not fair that women are held to the same legal standards as everyone else. Give me a fucking break. I also love how in all of their examples they say "had sex with" as if it absolutely wasn't rape. Vice is, once again, delusional.
/r/MensRights25/10/17 10:56 PM
21

All I'm seeing there is 1002 people that got raped. I fail to see how that's a good thing.
/r/MGTOW23/10/17 11:09 PM
2

Some women are saying that #MeToo doesn't apply to men. Plenty more are. This is not an open and shut case. Please don't assume that all feminists are as cruel as y'all constantly say they are. Actually, please don't look at feminism at a collective in general. Simplifying things like that saves time at the expense of the truth.
/r/MensRights17/10/17 05:34 AM
1

I just barely pulled back from the edge about six months ago. I'll shoot you a pm, though I gather it's a little late.
/r/ExRedPill17/10/17 12:20 AM
13

Honestly they can justify it however they want, as long as they're against genital mutilation I'm content. It's a start.
/r/MensRights13/10/17 09:15 PM
1

The only reason I say hypothisized instead of speaking in absolutes is because it's proven. It's still beyond likely but it hasn't been addressed in terms of science. And there have been some pretty significant changes to how much open competition and pressure there is between students, I'm gonna just copy-past what I said in another reply, appologies if this doesn't answer everything: The school system was changed to suit the typical girl because the typical girl is more agreeable than the typi…
/r/MensRights11/10/17 02:32 AM
2

It's an established fact that the actual average IQs for men and women are so close as to be considered the same. The only reason you are able to reach the conclusion you have is that you're moving forward with the assumption that those of below average intelligence should not be taken into account. It makes sense for men- the right men who actually have incredibly high IQ, to dominate many positions of responsibility. This isn't something I intend to argue. But your phrasing suggests that if yo…
/r/MensRights11/10/17 02:09 AM
2

It's true to say that some men are more intelligent than most people. But to say that "men have a higher IQ than women" or that "men are smarter than women" is plainly untrue. That's the point I'm trying to make. Yes, the top 5% of men can claim to be most intelligent than most women. But the people who actually bother with this arguement are usually not a part of this group, and make it to satisfy an insecurity, rather than to prove a point.
/r/MensRights11/10/17 01:10 AM
1

No worries. I'll edit the post real quick to make sure I don't cause that misunderstanding again =D
/r/MensRights11/10/17 12:40 AM
3

You're correct. The school system was changed to suit the typical girl. And the typical girl is more agreeable than the typical boy, albiet slightly. Rote learning favours agreeable people because the motivation to please parents and teachers pushes them to study more and it favours disagreeable people who don't hold authority in high regard. The old system was highly competitive, which favoured disagreeable people (mostly boys) who wanted to beat their friends on the leader boards. My best-mate…
/r/MensRights11/10/17 12:36 AM
3

Agreeableness isn't an indicator for IQ at all. It's a better indicator than IQ for sucess at school. It's hypothisized that this is because the motivation to study (pleasing parents and teachers) beats out raw talent.
/r/MensRights11/10/17 12:26 AM
3

They do. Honestly I don't think Big Five is particularly successful at giving an accurate portrayl of a person's character in it's entirety. I think it's big strength comes from it's ability to find strong, emperical evidence for a person's state of being and to predict their future with reasonable accuracy. For example trait agreeableness is the strongest indicator of grades throughout school and high-school. It's even a better predictor than IQ. That also may help to explain why girls outperfo…
/r/MensRights10/10/17 10:07 PM
24

This isn't fucking news. We've known for years that men rank higher in disagreeableness and women rank higher in agreeableness. We also know that this difference is so small (half a S.D) it only applies to the extremes. Around the average everyone might as well be the same but the 100 most agreeable people in the world are all women and the 100 most disagreeable people in the world are all men. This article is also complete bullshit because it suggests that agreeablenes is outright better than d…
/r/MensRights10/10/17 09:07 PM
7

Notice that nowhere in this poster does it say that there's anything wrong with women either. And there's also nothing wrong with our way crossing paths with the way of a women/relationships. This is about liberation and revolution. Not hatred and bigotry. AWALT culture almost has me abandoning this sub tbh.
/r/MGTOW08/10/17 09:22 AM
1

Y'all are being a little too harsh on this feed. It's no secret that most of you can't stand women or at least don't hold much respect for them. Quite frankly I think the echo-chamber's getting to you if you think their description of the community is off. I enjoy the top few posts of all time and there's still enough good content here to make me stick around, but the day-to-day front page is mostly variants of "women are stupid" memes and spiteful bullshit.
/r/MGTOW13/09/17 09:01 AM
2

So basically this all hinges on women being more Neurotic than men, which we've known for years. This is reference to the Big Five Personality Theory btw. People hate it when you start bringing that thing up because the differences are too consistent to argue with.
/r/MensRights08/09/17 12:20 PM
1

Personally I'm really against AWALT. Most of them aren't in my experience. The point of MGTOW is that relationships aren't worthwhile and we need to find more constructive models to base our lives upon. But all this sub does is spew shit about the thing we're supposed to be moving on from. All I see is preaching to the choir.
/r/MGTOW30/08/17 09:43 AM
1

When the man hits a rough patch the women has to put effort into supporting him and be strong in her own right. The kind of women that divorce-rape don't like don't those things.
/r/MGTOW30/08/17 09:39 AM
1

MGTOW isn't a movement. It's a life philosophy and I'm willing to bet the majority of people who hold it don't even know the community exists. So we'll probably never be able to say.
/r/MGTOW30/08/17 09:39 AM
1

Instagram model's acquire income in exchange for putting in effort. It's a job. I think it's a fucking stupid job but it's a job. And this does not belong on this sub.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/08/17 12:12 AM
39

Check the front page again. These are people who broke the law and didn't get away with it, or who shouldn't have. That's the point of the sub. It always has been. Are there misogynists on here? Definitely. Are you judging every single person who browses this sub based on a few misogynists. Definitely. Don't accuse us of generalizing if you're going to do it as well pls and ty.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/08/17 12:07 AM
2

Men are traditionally shamed for speaking up against transgressions or any sort of pain. Even when it's instigated by other men. If we had taken the issue seriously until told otherwise (which should be our default as a society) I feel like things would have gone much differently.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/08/17 11:55 PM
2

Except we don't have to talk about averages here. This actually happened. The point that I'm trying to get across is that we shouldn't be taking gender into account because there are actual people this happened to and iirc they were outraged.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/08/17 07:33 PM
3

Okay how about this for an argument. It's possible for a man to feel threatened and violated by a women. They actually have emotions very similar to every other person on the planet and violating their personal space and brushing it off as "no big deal" is completely unacceptable.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/08/17 05:54 AM
2

Every time we treat gender as relevant we perpetuate the gender roles you claim to be against. Every time we decide whether or not a punishment is "fair" based on the gender of the perpetrator we perpetuate every single aspect of this "patriarchy." Gender roles rely on each other. As long as you insist on maintaining just a single one then the entire thing stands. All of the oppression and hatred and violence and manipulation and all of the needless suffering inflicting on both sides. But no. Yo…
/r/PussyPassDenied29/08/17 05:08 AM
1

We think that women should be neither more powerful in social institutions nor powerless to male aggression. To the best of my knowledge most people here are for both sides of equality, we just only talk about the one here because that's what this subreddit is for god dammit.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/08/17 12:07 AM
11

Equality in the eyes of the law and diversity in careers are not the same thing. Most people here to my knowledge agree that there should be absolutely nothing stopping a women from applying herself to her chosen career. The only thing that should ever get in her way is that same competition that gets in everyone's way. If they win then good for them, but they shouldn't get a handicap just because they don't win very often. That's just encouraging them to not be good enough, which is a poisonous…
/r/PussyPassDenied29/08/17 12:05 AM
1

Thanks man! You're pretty cool too :3
/r/MensRights18/08/17 09:10 AM
4

Yeah, but I don't think this is a scenario where we can say the reaction would have been different if the injury were inflicted on a women who reacted in a similar way.
/r/MensRights18/08/17 06:27 AM
8

Oh no doubt she deserved some sort of punishment or criticism. I don't disagree with that. They portrayed it in an incredibly inappropriate manner. But people are discussing it like the women attempted murder. My point isn't that this isn't a relevant issue. It's just not a particularly troublesome or severe case. And it certainly isn't an example I'd use of skewed reactions to violence. Yet people are acting like somebody just shot the pope.
/r/MensRights18/08/17 05:59 AM
3

Yeah it's in the company's best interests to prioritize women so that they can disprove claims that they don't employ women. "Look at Jennifer over here! We hired her over a more suitable male employee and she's happy and successful in her career! Equality!"
/r/MensRights18/08/17 05:53 AM
1

but such activism is not supported by the liked of Elam/AVfM. Elam is not the international ambassador of Men's Rights. I would argue that he actually does a terrible job of representing the Men's Rights Movement. And there's no reason for Google not to support IMD. They seem to have some issues with diversity policies but they've done nothing so far to suggest any level of misogyny in their leadership. We need to stop assuming that everyone is the enemy. Most parties and individuals I've talked…
/r/MensRights18/08/17 05:43 AM
6

What the fuck dude! It was an accident and she apologized at least three or four times. I absolutely agree that she should have been penalized somehow or at least gone out of her way to make it up to him later, but seriously. You make it sound like she deliberately attacked him to gain an advantage and got away from it. She was just making a poor attempt at friendly banter.
/r/MensRights18/08/17 05:36 AM
4

I just can't imagine giving that type of response to anyone in crisis. ... Did I get raped LOL????? He doesn't sound like he's in crisis. And the top comment puts it perfectly. If he feels violated he should absolutely report it or at least tell her to never do that again. If not, he should react however he sees fit. The two answers you posted were both reasonable and well-intended by my eyes.
/r/MensRights18/08/17 05:33 AM
1

"The BBC to launch a topical radio panel show where the host and most of the guests are women." Sounds like the equivalent of a lot of male shows. It's unlikely to be entirely female because having a minority of members of the opposite sex opens up a lot of potential for comedy/discussion. I see no problem with this. If the show's terrible people won't watch it and it'll fail. Bit of a non-issue tbh.
/r/MensRights18/08/17 05:28 AM
2

Ideally, I'd like the MRM to be completely impartial to anything remotely resembling an organization. Otherwise, we might find a few power-hungry men trying to abuse it in the future to gain additional privilege in the same way that many here complain about in the feminist movement.
/r/MensRights18/08/17 04:50 AM
5

It seems that we're making quiet progress as people realize these issues one-by-one, Which is good. I'd like the MRM to avoid finding positions of power and creating organizations as much as possible, to reduce the possibility that when we do succeed, men don't try to push for more as some feminist groups do right now.
/r/MensRights18/08/17 04:48 AM
2

Women in high skill jobs/trades is fine, so long as they're held accountable to the same standards as everyone else. If she got a 40 second head-start to "promote gender diversity" and won by 3 seconds and claimed to have earned it, that would be a problem. She's doing rather poorly from what I can see. Nobody's trying to help her. They just let her keep racing and getting low places whenever she tries to take on serious competition. She's low on the ladder. I will agree that Affirmative Action …
/r/MGTOW16/08/17 11:29 AM
4

Honestly, TheRedPill can get banned. It's mostly a PUA Community from what I've seen. Kinda creepy and it's odd that a lot of them refuse to admit it but are still proud of their "work". I have my problems with MGTOW, but for the most part it's pretty solid. A little heavy-handed on the women-hating but I enjoy the philosophy.
/r/MGTOW16/08/17 10:58 AM
2

This also, rather fittingly, hit the frontpage of /r/pussypassdenied a couple of days ago.
/r/MGTOW16/08/17 10:37 AM
2

The entire point of MGTOW is that nothing matters outside of your personal sphere of control. Cause and effect. Not only is this irrelevant to you, it's irrelevant to everyone other than Dancia Patrick and her failed career.
/r/MGTOW16/08/17 10:34 AM
4

TBH Legal marriage's only purpose is to enable divorce-rape so I'd be pretty happy with that.
/r/MGTOW16/08/17 08:19 AM
1

Yes there are a lot of people going out of their way to give you guys bad publicity. But I don't see many of you, outside of a few figureheads, going out of your way to raise the message. AskMen has become much more self-aware recently but I never see anyone standing up for men in other areas of the internet. It's all contained here, where nobody can see it.
/r/MensRights14/08/17 06:40 AM
1

And various things like it. Most of the obvious MRA and MGTOW sympathizers who get out of their subs tend to be pretty nasty. At least the ones I've seen noticed.
/r/MensRights14/08/17 12:26 AM
-1

Not until you provide evidence. These people have found plenty of evidence of the dark side of the movement. They have reason to assume that you are what they say you are. You're getting nothing but bad publicity. That's a problem. You need to resolve it if you want to get anywhere.
/r/MensRights13/08/17 09:22 PM
-5

If you want to prove these people wrong, you need to find ways to get more exposure and show then that Men's Rights Activists can be reasonable and can align with other causes. These assumptions aren't going away until you disprove them.
/r/MensRights13/08/17 08:41 AM
28

Not really a "pussypassdenied" situation. It's fucking awful, but would probably be a better fit on /r/CringeAnarchy tbh. Doesn't make a difference whether or not it's a women making the post.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/08/17 10:49 PM
30

If our testicles where on our chest, no we wouldn't. If your boobs were between your legs, yes you fucking would.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/08/17 10:00 PM
6

Every reputable scientist or professor who read the piece confirmed that most of Demore's statements were accurate. There was one issue I noticed where he said that the different talents and preferences in the workforce between men and women were dependent on biological differences. I would argue that they're based on sociological differences, which are easier to shape across generations and . However, his core assumptions were accurate and the conclusions he reached based off of them seemed fai…
/r/MensRights11/08/17 09:27 PM
29

Is this real? Like, is this actually, seriously happening? Does anyone have a source? Because I really want to believe it isn't true. If it is, good. Let them do it. Let the women of the world swell the ranks of our militaries and realize what a 'privilege' it really is. It's complete bullshit and it shouldn't happen. But if we're going to force diversity in such stupid ways, at least we can do so in the fields that show that our lives aren't as unbalanced as some might think.
/r/MensRights11/08/17 12:28 PM
3

You will not contact me ever again you crazy bitch. Have a nice life.
/r/MensRights10/08/17 10:30 PM
1

Yeah, lower class men do something because they have families to support. Many middle class young men are just as shit as women because they're punished for being skilled. Oh, sorry, "privileged."
/r/MGTOW10/08/17 03:04 AM
7

MGTOW doesn't mean a hermit monk who doesn't even look at women. It means doing whatever the fuck you want regardless of whether or not anyone wants you to (within moral and legal boundaries of course). Hell, I consider myself MGTOW and I'm completely open to relationships. I just can't be bothered looking for them.
/r/MGTOW10/08/17 02:47 AM
1

The modern stereotypical women? To some extent yes. But not all women. They're probably no less useless and pathetic than more modern men though.
/r/MGTOW10/08/17 02:43 AM
10

The reason men rarely ever make a "cry for help" is because we know nobody's going to give us any.
/r/MGTOW10/08/17 02:24 AM
3

They look like hickeys or something similar to me.
/r/MensRights08/08/17 03:46 AM
0

Yeah it's kind of dumb to go to the law over this, but the alternative is common sense. How well has that worked against modern-feminism so far?
/r/MensRights05/08/17 08:19 PM
2

White people hate on white people.
/r/MensRights05/08/17 08:18 PM
1

What university is this? I'd love to get in touch and show a little support.
/r/MensRights05/08/17 08:15 PM
8

I'm getting sick of this "all girls are the same" waffle in this sub. That isn't the fucking point. The point is that a relationship and a family aren't worth pursuing when there're so many better options out there. We get called misogynists because we upvote this shit. We're going our own way, so why do we fucking care what they do with the ones that remain? If this chick also doesn't care about relationships and just wants to enjoy the dick-of-the-week, let her. Hypocrisy is an absolute waste …
/r/MGTOW05/08/17 08:13 PM
1

I love this. Hell, my personal take on MGTOW doesn't even involve avoiding relationships. I'll get into a relationship happily if I really want to. My main purpose is to separate my thoughts about relationships with my sense of self-worth and to justify my life through living my life. If I can find a partner who fits that policy, I'll be a very happy man.
/r/MGTOW03/08/17 12:19 AM
8

In terms of acquiring happiness, most of them already are. The problem is that, sad to say, we need to either drag out the process long enough to figure out how to keep the goddamned human race alive or actually solve the issues that made MGTOW necessary in the first place.
/r/MGTOW03/08/17 12:11 AM
1

All I'm not so sure of. Enough to make it not worth our time? Sure.
/r/MGTOW03/08/17 12:03 AM
2

Yeah, health, good genes and ability to birth have traditionally been the main requirements for a women to be a suitable partner. These traits are all directly associated with how attractive they are. While men have been required to be able to provide and protect. These traits nowadays are associated with income, stability, willingness to put up with your shit, etc. And when I say traditionally, I mean the thousands of years before we built international (or even national) communities where the …
/r/PussyPassDenied29/07/17 08:35 AM
2

I dunno man. I'm getting into MRA and MGTOW, but let's be real. There are a fuckton of incels and neckbeards out there doing the exact same thing (setting unrealistic standards while holding themselves completely unaccountable).
/r/PussyPassDenied29/07/17 08:30 AM
8

The race issue has never been as widely well received as the feminist issue, and people aren't going to sympathize with Obama anyway because he's a dude.
/r/MensRights29/07/17 07:41 AM
1

That's because it's second nature to you. I suspect most people are surprised that you even consider doing something like that.
/r/MensRights29/07/17 07:26 AM
2

Hah. They're pretending that men have choices...
/r/MensRights28/07/17 09:46 AM
10

Nah, let them keep going. Hopefully they'll fuck up and reveal weaknesses like this more often in the future.
/r/MensRights28/07/17 09:28 AM
3

Female accountability, or lack thereof, in a nutshell. I haven't heard enough cases or evidence to actually say that this is systematic, but I very strongly suspect it is.
/r/MensRights28/07/17 06:53 AM
1

Game of Thrones is a mainstream TV show. It's primary goal is to relate to people in order to gain fans and therefore, money. Feminism is mainstream and therefore, many people find "empowered" women either relateable or admirable.
/r/MensRights28/07/17 06:38 AM
1

That's awesome, and I respect that, but you're a god-damned unicorn tbh.
/r/MensRights28/07/17 06:23 AM
3

Isn't that want the neckbeards want though?
/r/MensRights28/07/17 06:14 AM
1

Meh. I dislike the idea of expecting women to offer me services as much as I dislike the idea of me offering anything to them. If I were to be in a relationship we'd give whatever we had available and if it were suitable then we'd get along just fine. Of course, if they expect me to be the hardworking provider I'd hope that I can come home to a damn sandwich. I've got no room in my heart for double-standards.
/r/MGTOW27/07/17 01:37 PM
3

As a brand new addition myself, I'd rather we were larger and more quality. But I know humanity doesn't work that way. Women aren't the only ones with issues lmao.
/r/MGTOW27/07/17 01:24 PM
3

Not to mention that this particular pops is a legless badass with some kickass stories that he couldn't tell when the boy was younger.
/r/MGTOW27/07/17 01:18 PM
2

Most people nowadays don't know how to cook a decent meal. It's really sad.
/r/MGTOW27/07/17 12:34 PM
2

I think he's hyped this up well beyond what it should be. Really they know absolutely nothing about each other and he's already gushing about her meeting his parents like they've been actively dating for months. It's pretty creepy.
/r/MGTOW27/07/17 12:33 PM
4

I dunno if he usually acts like this. I feel like he's had the kind of experiences with women that a lot of people have but is in denial. When they continued this joke for so long and kept remembering to go back to it he started hyping it up in his mind and thinking that there was something special when it's fucking Tinder.
/r/MGTOW27/07/17 12:30 PM
1

Yeah that's a much clearer way of putting it. Thanks :3
/r/MGTOW26/07/17 08:14 PM
2

My point is that the sample is biased. It doesn't survey all women. It survey's women who are willing to put in regular effort to search for a partner on a specific website. Whether or not we can come up with a "reason" that these women should be different is irrelevant because quite simply, we have no idea what the difference is between okcupid and everyone everywhere because nobody has ever compared them.
/r/MGTOW26/07/17 11:52 AM
2

women rate 80% of guys as below average on looks. Correctly shown in the statistics, but saying that all women rate men that way based off of the study isn't realistic because the sample is biased (only women who were actively looking for a partner on that site where surveyed). I suspect it's still pretty telling, but there's at least a 10%-15% error bar there.
/r/MGTOW26/07/17 11:16 AM
9

The main reason is that for feminism to admit that male issues are a direct result of an oppressive society is for feminism to admit that we do not live in a patriarchy because men are oppressed as well. If they were to make such a concession their entire movement would lose all traction and they would be ground into the dirt. Feminism is no longer playing identity politics. This is about realpolitik. That is to say, political actions motivated purely by the pursuit of power, disregarding ideolo…
/r/MensRights26/07/17 10:48 AM
24

I can't decide whether or not this is a good thing. On one hand she's recognizing a corner stone of how men and boys are treated poorly in society. On the other hand, she's recommending the course of returning to the way they were treated before feminism, which isn't exactly a perfect solution anyway.
/r/MensRights26/07/17 10:44 AM
1

Oh don't worry. I've been down that path. I have no intention of going back.
/r/MensRights26/07/17 07:02 AM
3

More likely still, she'd be the one receiving all of the support.
/r/MensRights26/07/17 12:09 AM
9

That's awesome. I really hope I can run into someone like that someday so that I can go out there and join her.
/r/MensRights25/07/17 11:40 PM
3

I'm actually pretty liberal personally. Left-leaning as well. I don't disagree with a lot of the choices made regarding women in society. I do disagree with almost every choice made regarding men.
/r/MensRights25/07/17 11:39 PM
3

Yeah, whenever anyone asks me why MRA's are so angry, I just tell them one of a half-dozen outrageous stories I have memorized and end with, "We're angry because we should be." Usually gets the point across.
/r/MensRights25/07/17 11:37 PM
4

Feminist standards and actions often praise men who hate themselves. These men learn that they are terrible because of their privilege and that they must disregard that privilege and sacrifice their own well-being at the expense of women to be considered valuable. Feminist men tend to hate themselves and their gender. For a feminist man to question the feminist ideology is for him to discard the only thing left in the world that provides him with a sense of self-worth. Understanding this is crit…
/r/MensRights25/07/17 11:26 PM
1

Thanks a ton dude. This'll certainly be helpful. :)
/r/MensRights25/07/17 09:07 PM
2

But the least we can do is make it harder for them. If we're polite, controlled and reasonable, they have a lot less to use against us, and spectators to the argument (the people I'm usually really trying to convince) are more likely to see us as polite, controlled and reasonable than war-mongering, misogynistic fascists.
/r/MensRights25/07/17 09:06 PM
1

Women have the power to completely ruin a man's social reputation at any time by labeling him as a misogynist or rape apologist, whether or not that's true. There are also a fair number of studies that either suggest or conclude that we as a society are significantly more sympathetic towards women and instinctively allocate a greater share of all resources to them.
/r/MensRights25/07/17 08:04 PM
1

Good can come from balanced, long-term relationships. All marriage does is give the women more security in divorce cases and cost of lot of money.
/r/MensRights25/07/17 02:03 PM
1

Hmmm. Do you mind linking that study to me? I'm creating an armada of studies and statistics right now with which I hope to convince a few people of our arguments and this seems invaluable =D
/r/MensRights25/07/17 02:01 PM
12

Yet when the women is falsely accusing the man, the police response is to cuff the man and put in a cell for a day or two to do their research and ensure that there's no problem. This isn't an issue in my opinion. If someone is accused of a violent crime this is standard procedure because there have been times when the policemen laughed it off and later that night the victim died. Yet when the women is accused, the victim is laughed at if not arrested. And sometimes, later that night or just lat…
/r/MensRights25/07/17 01:35 PM
1

In that case, you will find yourself opposed to most mainstream feminists organizations. You will likely not find yourself opposed by the average feminist with no affiliation with such organizations. Those individuals identify with feminism more out of misunderstanding than hate.
/r/MensRights25/07/17 01:30 PM
9

They do. Then they either come back with squat and say there was no probable evidence or they put the man in cuffs instead. A study in the US showed that men who called 911 to report domestic violence against them were 20% more likely to be arrested than the partners they accused.
/r/MensRights25/07/17 01:13 PM
3

Whatever you're leaning towards I'd suggest that you talk to her about it. The fact of the matter is that no matter how much she loves you she's been taught that sympathy towards you comes later. If you explain to her that your emotional needs are as deep as they are (rather than as shallow as she thinks they are) then I would hope she'd understand better in the future. Of course I tried that with my (now-ex) girlfriend and she told me I was needy so good luck xD
/r/MensRights25/07/17 01:10 PM
575

“I wanted him dead and now he’s gone and I’m fine with it.” it “felt good knowing he was going to die.” Unintentionally negligent homicide. Yeah, no.
/r/MensRights25/07/17 11:28 AM
4

Good correction. Whenever anyone says "patriarchy hurts men too" I just reply "How exactly is a system that causes a significant amount of harm to everyone, regardless of gender, supposed to be skewed so far towards men that we can justify calling it a patriarchy?"
/r/MensRights25/07/17 11:20 AM
14

She'd be investigated and have all the same consequences a guy would. This is just simply not true. Women on Men crime is barely reported because those who do get reported often just end up worse off than they were before. Not only are their claims laughed out of the station and not even investigated, they'll likely be subject to more abuse from friends, family or the original perp for making the fact that they were assaulted known.
/r/MensRights25/07/17 11:01 AM
1

The short version is that they aren't, but feminists dare not insult Islam because the religion is receiving a lot of sympathy right now. I think most people who have done a fair amount of research on the subject will agree that if feminists open themselves up to judgement or criticism by any mainstream party or community, most of their arguments and their ideology will be dismantled within months. I'd like to think that a lot of prominent feminists know this and use their influence to inspire s…
/r/MensRights25/07/17 10:59 AM
3

Absolutely. If someone provides a real reason that they should have my seat they've got it. "I'm a women" is not a real reason.
/r/MensRights25/07/17 10:07 AM
9

I mean, on the bright side, she realized what she'd done wrong. Hopefully it won't happen again. But yeah this is absolute bullshit. If it were my I'd probably have called her out on the spot but I get that when you're in such a high pressure situation it's hard to be assertive or aggressive.
/r/MensRights25/07/17 10:06 AM
5

Show her this video. Also make it very clear that it is her job to convince you to let her mutilate your child's genitals. This is not up for debate. You are not convincing her not to. You are telling her that she does not have the right to make such an impactful choice for your child and that this is a choice that can only be made by the child, knowing all of the risks, because he is the only one who has any investment in this decision and making it for him before he can even talk is nothing sh…
/r/MensRights25/07/17 10:03 AM
10

The only benefit to being falsely accused is that he now understands the level to which this society is capable of oppressing him, as well as the truly horrible extent to which the people in his life are able to go to hurt him.
/r/MensRights25/07/17 09:51 AM
11

You did give him some perspective. You gave him the same perspective that most Americans share about college. In response. He offered you his perspective about how college matters to him and his dreams and aspirations. He did so peacefully, with not insults or bullshit. Simply his own thoughts and feelings. You're acting exactly like feminists do when we try to tell them about our point of view on men's rights.
/r/MensRights25/07/17 09:50 AM
1

Because we definitely sent disable Islamic women from Afganistan to fight for Britain in the ditches.
/r/MensRights25/07/17 09:38 AM
6

Yeah women bashing is different. I personally made a few pretty nasty comments not even too long ago about feminism with no real logic but have since regretted them. But when I see shit about "see women are so privileged, they're such bitches" I get pretty upset. This is exactly the pointless name-calling that allows feminism and other opposition to take credibility away from our cause.
/r/MensRights25/07/17 09:34 AM
2

Oh god this is so true. I'm about 90% sure that I suffer from moderate depression and social anxiety, but I lost hope in getting an official diagnoses because the two women I saw (one after the other) refused to even consider it and run a full diagnostic. I seem to be handling it alright but it's pretty disheartening.
/r/MensRights25/07/17 09:29 AM
1

As far as I know, you can't. However the internet usually has something for everybody so don't lose hope. And hit me up if you find one. It's a lonely world.
/r/MensRights25/07/17 09:12 AM
3

By what definition am I sick? Do I say anywhere here that I am anything other than appalled by the situation these boys are in? Disgusted by the danger that they and the soldiers they're pitted against are put in? I'm certainly not being emotional about this. Because that won't do shit for anyway. At this point I think it's pretty safe to say that while emotions are incredibly good at recognizing problems, but they're abysmal when it comes to solving them.
/r/MensRights24/07/17 02:31 AM
4

My arguments are in favor of the tragic but necessary deaths of these boys because it's unreasonable to expect a mentality shift that will likely take decades, even a century to fully develop, to take effect in the next twenty four hours or so. We don't win the war by throwing ourselves at a losing battle. If you or anyone else have any reasonable solutions to get each and every one of those kids out of there without putting the lives of those soldiers at risk I'm sure the Nigerian government wo…
/r/MensRights23/07/17 07:07 PM
3

We're not comparing, we're understanding. In the case of men's equality now and women's in the past we need to understand both what is going wrong and why it's happening. Who suffers more has nothing to do with this. The problem is that those women in those circumstances did suffer, which is why our social structure has evolved to handle it.
/r/MensRights23/07/17 06:23 PM
1

Nobody is ever right to be petty, but nor should men or women be denied an occasional petty moment, preferably to be exercised in private. We're human beings. We get frustrated sometimes, and those frustrations can take petty forms. As long as you don't kid yourself into thinking vocalizing these petty issues is healthy I don't have a problem with it. Systematic petty issues like "manspreading" however...
/r/MensRights23/07/17 06:15 PM
7

Mate. This is r/MensRights and we all understand male disposability. Honestly I agree with u/aokusman on this one. It's a terrible situation. These boys do not deserve their fates. They deserve a shitload more grief than they're probably going to get, but right now these soldiers have thousands of combatants coming at them. And enough of them are willing to kill to put their lives at serious risk. Age is irrelevant. If we want to teach society to value male life, we need to start by teaching men…
/r/MensRights23/07/17 05:58 PM
2

Yeah good call dude. You don't want to get anywhere near a situation like this.
/r/MensRights23/07/17 04:57 PM
0

Yeah that's what I first though. She has to think about herself first. Hopefully our message can pick up traction over the next few years and then maybe we'll see a few people like her coming out of the woodwork and lending their support.
/r/MensRights22/07/17 02:47 AM
6

We are. Hopefully she managed to reach a few other people in the audience as well. I plan on speaking about these issues myself at my High School Speech competition and not only expect to lose on the spot, but to lose a lot of respect from my class mates. Meh. I went years without it. I can handle a few more months.
/r/MensRights22/07/17 02:45 AM
3

I'll be surprised if she isn't bullied out of the course. OP, if you haven't approached her already, do so. Showing a bit of appreciation and support might give her the courage she needs.
/r/MensRights22/07/17 02:44 AM
3

This fucker got gilded. The whole deal with parents trying to get out of their responsibility for their children, and starting a new life is part of what drove me from my parents. I get that adults are entitled to remarry and try to be happy, but when you dump your kids because your new s/o takes up all of your time, and the s/o doesn't pitch in, you're fucked up, and you've fucked up. At this point it's safe to assume that at best you have visitation for the kids, how are you supposed to contri…
/r/MensRights21/07/17 12:22 PM
2

In my experience they're not really used differently. And this is not single-handedly an issue. It's an incredibly small thing. My point is that it's one of several incredibly small cases where you could say "it'd be different if it were a dude," but it's not worth starting a fight about. That doesn't mean it isn't worth posting.
/r/MensRights12/07/17 01:29 PM
3

The point of this post is that it displays one of many ways in which double-standards pit society against men. It is not a massive issue that needs to be addressed immediately. It is not even an issue in it's own right, but it is relevant to men's rights issues. Therefore, it belongs here.
/r/MensRights12/07/17 12:38 PM
6

I agree with their opinion that it's not right. I disagree that it's a huge issue. Do you think that we should be taking to the streets and protesting at a massive scale over a difference in definitions for two similar phrases on the internet?
/r/MensRights12/07/17 10:48 AM
16

Nobody said anything about a serious issue. It's just a noticeable difference. In fact, well over half of the comments here are saying exactly what you are, only politely. :)
/r/MensRights12/07/17 10:34 AM
5

Absolutely is. But that guy didn't say it was. Nobody's calling for us to protest. In fact only a handful of people are even taking it seriously. Sometimes it feels good to be petty.
/r/MensRights12/07/17 10:33 AM
28

Nobody here is obsessing. This bloke made a post and it got upvoted because it belongs in this sub. It's not a huge issue to rally around. It's not our final push to wage war against the world, it's just something kinda funny and very relevant. Some people are saying otherwise. Some people are idiots. I'm willing to bet there's a pretty heavy overlap.
/r/MensRights12/07/17 10:32 AM
1

As far as I know, such groups are yet to use any form of sabotage to push their narrative, they just refuse to listen to our arguements! Can't be proven wrong if you don't give them time to share their point of view! Taps head
/r/MensRights08/07/17 10:09 AM
1

Yeah this is sexual harassment for sure, but they're deliberating exaggerating and labeling it as assault to justify the "empowered young women fighting for her rights". It's the same old sob-story they run over and over again, because it makes money.
/r/MensRights08/07/17 10:05 AM
1

Yeah if she'd just punched him and they'd left it at that I'd have had no problem with it to be honest. But she made the choice to be as violent as the situation possibly allowed her to be. She used basically every means at her disposal to bring him harm, short of taking a hammer to his temple.
/r/MensRights08/07/17 09:54 AM
1

If you hitting her in anger is an abhorrent thing, her hitting you is likewise. If she says that it's okay because she can't hurt you as much, tell her that intent means more than effect, because it does.
/r/MensRights04/06/17 12:21 PM
1

because male empowerment! oppression FTFY xD
/r/MensRights26/05/17 04:24 AM
4

I mean, personally I don't see the issue provided it isn't the premiere night and men still have the opportunity to see the film, but I absolutely agree with one of the tweets saying that if this was an event of a men's-only screening for a manly movie there would be a complete uproar and the theater would be boy-cotted out of business. All in all this is 100% a publicity stunt to appeal to the feminist demographic, because it's one of the largest demographics out there nowadays.
/r/MensRights26/05/17 04:23 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter