TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Dashing2025 Archive

View 8 posts and 229 comments by Dashing2025 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

Blue-pill has an overwhelming overlap with liberalism: the idea that everyone is unique and no one is inherently more valuable than someone else, an anti-hierarchy perspective where liberalism addressed society, blue-pill addresses dating. Blue-pill also strongly coincides with modern feminism: an idea that societies are ran and designed by men for men's benefit. I think blue-pill is more proactive than you're suggesting: it is not merely a reaction to red-pill, rather it asserts a sort of liber…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/24 03:38 PM
-19

Isn't it too early for children to be learning sex-ed? I don't think boys and girls below age 16-18 should be exposed to such adult topics.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/01/24 05:49 PM
–

Why would a man treat a woman like his therapist? I'm going to have to be clear because this problem isn't fully comprehended by men like you: Women do not care about your incel problems and conspiracies, they ARE NOT your therapist. You're exactly the incel who is the reason why misogyny still exists, as a male I always hear this issue from women about male trauma dumping. Quit pestering women with your trauma.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/24 03:46 PM
29

It's interesting how commonly we hear: "Men of quality don't fear equality" "A real man isn't afraid to be a feminist" "Strong men support women" So by feminist dogmas: men do indeed owe women something. I suppose this ties in line with the belief that men dominated women for all human history, which is an apex fallacy, much like almost every other feminist claim.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/01/24 02:02 PM
10

The problem with male feminists is that they not only adher to the morality of feminism, but they also attached their ego to the perceived heroism of being a feminist; a form of chivalry as you put it. Thus their fight for feminism is almost a zero-sum game.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/01/24 03:21 PM
34

I have noticed that we humans -as David Hume correctly pointed out- are far more emotional than logical; we do not see reality precisely or concretely for what it is, rather we have a sort of unique meaning that we attach to it. Meaning that, it is never a logical and completely meaningful interpretation of life that you would get from any given person. Moreover, speaking of another human phenomena: Sigmund Freud has coined it as Verleugnung or Denial, whereby an individual takes a "vacation" fr…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/01/24 06:00 AM
18

. Prioritize making money but don't get too sucked into corporate culture . Know how to be selfish without being cruel . Know how to differentiate between a good woman and a bad one . To be moral is to be moderate
/r/MensRights20/01/24 03:05 AM
8

It's good to opt out of toxic societal expectations, but one can still benefit from participating in the marketplace to enjoy the technological, medical, and hygienic products and services.
/r/MensRights19/01/24 02:57 PM
19

They simply don't care.
/r/MensRights19/01/24 01:25 AM
3

• ⁠More criminal? Yes, since men have been traditionally expected to provide, plus there are fewer social resources to support men. Of course men will turn to • ⁠More violent/aggressive? Well, when men are the only ones required to fight wars, society manufactures aggression in men. You can't have soft people be your soldiers. • ⁠More mentally ill? Yes, mostly because we train men to be hard, emotionless, and to shut up about their problems. When men discuss issues uniquely affecting them, it's …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/01/24 06:18 PM
23

It is actually true that in many science fields, women are actually outnumbering men, thus the AI isn't actually too far out of line. The takeaway here is: if women are doing so well in our society, how can it be a patriarchy?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/01/24 03:19 PM
3

Take a break from social media.
/r/MensRights17/01/24 03:14 PM
3

It's pretty easy to feel lonely when your cities are designed for cars and not pedestrians.
/r/MensRights17/01/24 01:44 AM
4

Because they can't control their ego and emotions.
/r/MensRights16/01/24 06:14 PM
4

The issue here is that we wouldn't be able to create a distinction between the deaths of armed and military supported combatants (drafted or voluntary) and between unarmed civilians who have no means to protect themselves.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/01/24 05:27 AM
7

It's not so much about teaching them that they're victims; in my view, in the capitalist market society that we live in, it's easy for an individual to eventually become a cog in the economic machine and have their well-fare disintegrated. Contributing this feeling of alienation, men and women as two genders can eventually begin to step on each other's well-being inadvertently. As such, movements of feminism and masculanism are not inherently corrupt movements.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/01/24 05:00 PM
1

You are correct that you wouldn't necessarily need a family/retirement plans to be happy. My point was to draw light on the important on having blueprint or a plan in life to have predictability. Though routines are synonymous with boredom, they do add a relief from chaos that often evokes anxiety in many people, especially young men who so often feel powerless in our competitive world. To each their own in this regard: yes, some people will be happy with their family, home ownership etc.. while…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/01/24 03:19 PM
32

Really depends on how you view the term "feminism", it could either mean "the examinations of women's well-fare and mental-health", or "all men are barbarians".
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/01/24 03:15 PM
6

Hi OP, I'm really sorry to hear all this; as others have mentioned, you must consult a therapist/relative as face-to-face interactions cannot be supplemented or replaced by reddit communications. Besides that, I would highly recommend developing a routine-like lifestyle, I know this might sounds like boomer-nonsense, but I believe it holds great merit: the standard blueprint of college->work->family->retirement provides us with a life that is stable and predictable, and that factor cannot be ign…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/01/24 11:23 PM
2

Don't take it personally; the misery is their problem, it stems from their negative past experiences and is in no way shape or form related to you.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/01/24 06:16 PM
8

It happened to every single human being on Earth, don't worry about it. Mistakes are bound to happen, we only think they were avoidable in hindsight; but without that mistake one would have never known what to change.
/r/MensRights12/01/24 08:46 PM
3

I'm curious as to how the animal recognizes whether a human is of either the two genders.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/01/24 10:58 AM
10

I see your viewpoint, and I think you make a very good argument. My reasoning as to why I resist the concept of a male-dominated history is a result of male suffering remaining an invisible topic, even in the years of liberal tolerance in 2023. Such minute details can be examined here. An international signing being made to protect the rights of women doesn't tell me that men were living quiet comfortably: for instance, when that treaty was signed, was it not the case that most prisons, as they …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/01/24 08:08 PM
9

I do agree that irritation is a natural response: an agitated response to an external opinion that isn't congruent with your morals is only human; it is certainly not immoral for one to be recluse on feminist issues. Though, I see that the premise of your argument: feminism struggles to find a middle ground due to historical discrimination. Is it really historically accurate to claim that women were discriminated against whistle men lived comfortable lives? We also must be careful in our constru…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/01/24 07:40 PM
6

It is very easy to slip in radicalness, a true strong spirit knows how to stay moderate.
/r/MensRights07/01/24 02:54 AM
15

Let them dwell in their hatred, such toxic women ought to be avoided and ignored.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/01/24 02:53 AM
5

Any country that doesn't randomly start wars, persecute political opponents, have a terrible economy and so on, will be a decent place.
/r/MensRights06/01/24 11:05 PM
3

I'd like to see a movie that portrays a man's struggle against the inevitable isolation, and how he finds solace by providing for himself. So commonly are men told to open up, only for them to be viciously attacked when they do by both conservatives and liberals.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/01/24 09:51 PM
4

Moderation: there will always be some loneliness in our lives that we must endure.
/r/MensRights06/01/24 09:15 PM
6

The grass is greener where you water it. Any society that is non-authoritarian in it's governance can be a good place for a man to live peacefully.
/r/MensRights06/01/24 08:25 PM
2

I agree that the cure for your loneliness would be for you to engage in self-improvement. But in general, did your isolation and loneliness subside when you relocated? I sought to uncover cultural differences in the US vs Germany, for one cannot deny that certain societies place bigger emphasis on relationships for others. I also suspect that Germany's walkable neighborhoods and the close-knit design their cities offer better opportunities for socialization compared to the US's endless suburban …
/r/MensRights06/01/24 12:04 AM
20

I do see that today's society is indeed hyper-individualistic. I am perhaps too optimistic here, but I predict a wave of frugality being sprung in the new generations of Gen-z and Alpha, as they adapt to a market that has far less financial opportunities than what the boomers grew up in. This frugality is comparable to what the silent generation that predated the boomers embodied: an emphasis on sacrifice and moderation. And in what the upcoming generations will uphold in terms of modesty of mat…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/01/24 08:08 PM
-2

These angry young men online are temporary: they will eventually overcome there anger, move on, get good jobs etc... and younger lads will take their place on these internet forums; as cliche as it sounds: it's the circle of life. Think of human personalities as a water swirl: it's present but the water that constitutes it is ever-changing. Far too commonly do we think of life as a perfectly trodden path with a blueprint; it isn't quite so the case bearing in mind that our struggle and suffering…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/01/24 03:47 PM
1

I hear from many that the western world in its entirety (France, Usa, Australia, etc...) is quite lonesome and materialistic, ; would you say Germany is overall a much happier place than the US?
/r/MensRights05/01/24 03:42 PM
6

It is rather extremist. I cannot see the full post however, so I will base my response on the title. Generalization, through the avoidance of a person for using certain terms, is certainly a discriminatory and unfair judgement on behalf of the generalized. Notwithstanding that, both men and women have every right to protect and shield themselves from toxic people. Thus, should a man run into a woman who unironically says "mansplaining" it would only be the self-respecting thing to avoid her.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/01/24 02:49 PM
71

It is a very broad topic; my deduction is that it isn't men who abused women primarily - rather, nature itself abused men and women. Of course, violent misogyny has always existed and I absolutely condemn it and would definitely support initiatives that would work to protect women of such threats, but to say "human history is a story of men abusing women", is incredibly reductionist and only serves to give women an excuse to hate men.
/r/MensRights05/01/24 04:05 AM
177

"Oppressing us for eons", is as ahistorical of an opinion as it can get. Humanity suffered from a general lack of resources throughout the thousands of years up until it amassed a level of knowledge and expertise and knew how to well coordinate society.
/r/MensRights05/01/24 03:23 AM
0

I know you meant the reference as a joke; I am still totally against the violent and hateful theme of the movie. One must be very careful not to let his anti-degenerate values justify the usage of violence.
/r/MensRights04/01/24 07:21 PM
3

I've had this thought for a while: Hegel's theory was that we humans are never fully autonomous beings: we need other humans to fully recognize our identities. As such, we can notice that masculinity needs a subject to protect and provide for, and to seek validation from that subject. As such, men's masculine drive drives them to seek validation from women far more than the reverse happens.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/01/24 07:19 PM
10

This is pure animalistic degeneracy. This is what happens when a society of weak childish men refuse to criticize women, and fail to uphold a modest lifestyle for the women to emulate.
/r/MensRights04/01/24 03:12 PM
4

I know it's not your point, but I'd argue that the whole point of dating is to get to know the person, and that's when you would discuss your long-term goals with the partner.
/r/MensRights03/01/24 03:17 PM
2

They are moderately right-winged from my observation, while remaining leftist on many other issues.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/01/24 11:29 AM
27

I do not think the UN should be taken seriously.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/12/23 07:13 PM
6

This really depends on your location: 70k in rural Indiana is a lot different than in Boston.
/r/MensRights31/12/23 02:10 AM
9

We ought to take into account the abnormality of the 20th century; a decade from 1970-1980 arguably brought more change for humankind than a time period of 1400-1500. Honestly it is tough to gauge as to how much digitalization disintegrated social relations, but the effect of it is noticeable with regards people's primary mode of interaction. Historical archives have demonstrated to us that we still do not have a true alternative to capital free markets and the rather undemocratic structure of c…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/12/23 03:51 PM
113

"I do not care about the truth, I only seek to vent my hatred".
/r/MensRights29/12/23 04:16 PM
13

Yes I have noticed that, though I also see this behavior in progressive people; misandry is not necessarily an inherent progressive or conservative trait.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/12/23 02:37 AM
2

I overreacted in my previous comment, I'm sorry about that. My point wasn't defeatist at all, not did I say therapy or opening up is worthless -maybe I wrote my post in a hurry. My point was that many feminists are too disingenuous when it comes to their concept of men opening up. For example, conservatives claim that women should forgo their education and become housewives, that is awful advice that is subtly disguising the desire to dominate women. Similarly, many feminists engage in virtue-si…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/12/23 02:27 AM
4

Well my friend, if "man up" is the only response you have to the issue I raised, then you're either too simple minded or emotionally unstable for me to bother debating. I do hope my words do not cause your emotional development to act as a venomous snake.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/12/23 11:29 PM
2

That's true. Chomsky had well highlighted this concept, and emphasized that before debating about labels and terms used to describe ideologies, one has to actually put meaning to these words.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/12/23 06:28 AM
4

Education in Asian countries is far more focused on objective sciences instead of subjective humanities; American universities can learn from that. As far as education providing a prideful effect in women and men, that will be shattered once they actually enter the workforce and get humbled under the pressure and deadlines.
/r/MensRights28/12/23 02:06 AM
1

You will need to define feminism: the one that encourages women to attain an education, or the one that shields them from any forms of criticism? That definition will greatly vary in how we are to assess the gender-societal effects of feminism.
/r/MensRights28/12/23 01:34 AM
4

Are you referring to the men who abused the women? I'd agree to that for some extent, but we have to acknowledge the fierce academic feminist literature that is bombarding young women, it is not only a culmination of past abuse.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/12/23 04:54 PM
38

True both genders can be emotionally immature, but the insults from women are often meant to discredit men's problems
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/12/23 04:53 PM
20

I will always support women's civil rights of lawful protection from violence, property ownership, education, workplace opportunities. With that said, my firm conviction is: modern feminine expressions are rotten to the core.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/12/23 04:35 PM
12

Male feminists are the most pathetic people I've ever met. Though I disagree with their rational about the tik-tok conspiracy. Getting more view on tik-tik would be natural as it is the social media app of choice in 2023 alongside instagram.
/r/MensRights27/12/23 04:09 PM
10

Spot on lmao, they'll tell you that you're a "real man" if you forgive your wife for sleeping with other dudes and doing other animalistic stuff. It's pure degeneracy.
/r/MensRights26/12/23 03:58 AM
1

Upwards mobility was possible at many points in time, as in the case of German craftsmen who came in as immigrants, black abolitionists like Douglass, and some presidents I was unaware of this information. We can still look at the total percentage of the male population at 1850 for instance and determine percentage of them had opportunities of financial success. Moreover, and I know this is a cherry-picked example but nonetheless offers us insight, there are many cases of women amassing a fortun…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/12/23 03:07 AM
1

No worries my friend, your idiot angry behavior has cemented the fact that you have little backing to your ideology. Have a nice day you aggressive moron.
/r/MensRights25/12/23 11:40 PM
0

Now, it is you who's being the idiot -there is no need for insults, unless you want to end up on the naughty list. You used circular logic, I asked you why women support each other more than men, you rerouted that statement without providing any explanation for it. Care to elaborate on your positions?
/r/MensRights25/12/23 11:19 PM
0

How did you conclude that there is a feminist lobby? There are innumerable millionaire and billionaire men in the USA, but there is no MRA lobby to speak of. I'm curious as to how you acknowledged the existence of a feminist lobby.
/r/MensRights25/12/23 10:28 PM
1

Being sheltered from harm due to being considered weak, akin to a child (who in their right mind would torture a child?), is hardly a privilege. Not being tortured isn't a privilege? I would argue that it is the privilege. Being considered powerful through your connection to a man is hardly true power. You are right, is it partial power, and that was only form of influence that men had as well: the average male through human history needed some form of connection to the upper classes to have a s…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/12/23 06:38 PM
1

You are fixating on the attitude made by the AI, but the point here is the filter itself which is blatantly in favor of women over men.
/r/MensRights25/12/23 04:29 PM
5

They don't care.
/r/MensRights24/12/23 04:11 AM
1

The Godfather is a wonderful story, even better in book form than in movie.
/r/MensRights24/12/23 04:10 AM
1

their country are the same ones going on dates, partying and abandoning their husbands for new men in Europe whilst their male Ukrainian counterparts are being slaughtered. Can you please provide proof of Ukrainian women living this lavishly?
/r/MensRights23/12/23 11:22 PM
1

I don't trust Pearl at all, she's the female equivalent of the bootlicking male feminists who only seek validation and ego-strokes.
/r/MensRights23/12/23 11:16 PM
21

What's wrong with being insecure? If you see a particular threat somewhere in the world, it is only sensible to do your best to avoid it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/12/23 11:15 PM
31

Because of women's social privilege. It's that simple.
/r/MensRights23/12/23 01:42 AM
21

You don't think feminists would be happy to shame you to Join the war should it ever break out in your country?
/r/MensRights21/12/23 02:33 PM
14

The only difference is that male feminist validation comes from performing "positive masculinity" and trying to come off as "nice guys" for women to like them or even praise them for being "one of the good ones" or "not like other boys". I agree that this is essentially repackaged traditional chivalry; instead of fighting off foreign soldiers or wild bears, chivalrous men today seek to fight the gender-wars in favor of the innocent princesses. And the red pillers' validation comes from performin…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/12/23 07:02 PM
48

I have suspected for a long time that male feminists are simply enjoying the female validation, a complete ego-boost that has little grounds in genuine moralism.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/12/23 06:38 PM
4

It has always occurred to me that men occupy both extremes when it comes to their influence on women: men (as a fragmented group) are simultaneously more aggressive and helpful towards women than the other way around.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/12/23 05:31 PM
2

Are there statistics that show us gender split amounts of deaths and hospitalizations from domestic violence?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/12/23 02:56 PM
3

That is the case in North America to be honest, I've seen far more warm attitudes abroad.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/12/23 03:38 AM
0

You can look at the end result of a culture's policies and judge it's intentions; for instance, it is clear to us how rotten the Taliban's morals are when we see the wretched extend of the failure of a state they tried to construct. Conversely, Japan is one of the most technologically, medically, and sanitarily advanced societies on Earth. Tying that to our discussion, it is also one of the safest for women. I don't disagree with you that Japanese corporate culture does see women with contempt, …
/r/MensRights18/12/23 11:51 PM
2

Yes I have heard of Japan's authoritarian corporate culture. Would you say there are any legal impediments for women to attain success in Japan?
/r/MensRights18/12/23 11:23 PM
1

Can you elaborate on how women are treated as a lesser?
/r/MensRights18/12/23 10:48 PM
4

The myth of male power by Warren Farrell.
/r/MensRights18/12/23 01:20 AM
8

There is blame on both genders for certainty. It just is the case that blaming women for anything is almost immediately touted as misogyny. I agree with you that traditional values do burden men today in some regards, but it's faulty to never criticize women and always blame oneself. That would the Jordan Peterson way, which is fallacious. I'd go as far to say a man who would never dare to blame women (feminists in particular) for anything would be the purely helpless one.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/12/23 05:11 PM
12

I often see your point being actualized in reality: a toxic man is just labeled as toxic, whereas a toxic women is a by-product of patriarchal conditioning.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/12/23 05:01 PM
8

You are making the case that traditional masculinity has degraded homosexuality for so long that it's common practice to use it as a derogative?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/12/23 04:47 PM
2

I am now thoroughly convinced that women in general are far more misandrist than men are misogynistic.
/r/MensRights15/12/23 03:14 PM
16

"Men should open up about their problems." "Wait, why are men talking about their problems? That's toxic." Please pick only one.
/r/MensRights15/12/23 01:59 PM
5

"Women are wonderful" It's part of human nature, and I believe that liberals are too naive to understand that their oversight off "women's oppression" although partially accurate is an end result of their gynocentricity.
/r/MensRights15/12/23 02:47 AM
-7

I know this may be controversial on this sub (and albeit a bit unrelated to OP's topic), but military drafts (when applied to both genders) can be a great tool for fostering discipline, strengthening character, and eliminating elitist attitude. Norway and Switzerland are two examples of countries that have military drafts and yet are extremely prosperous and progressive nations.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/12/23 02:11 AM
3

The Federalist papers made a voluminous case against complete state sovereignty.
/r/MensRights14/12/23 09:56 PM
22

Simply stop telling young schoolboys that they're privileged.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/12/23 06:56 PM
4

"Yeah, but which gender started the war?? Checkmate misogynist"
/r/MensRights14/12/23 06:55 PM
4

Fair enough. This is a bit off-topic: therapy on its own is not enough to fix anyone's life. OP needs to combine the therapy with a purpose in life, and I think far too many young men today are basing their self-esteem on their salary or attraction of women, which is an awful life direction.
/r/MensRights14/12/23 12:31 AM
14

I agree with your idea that people must tolerate the disapproval of others, but to what extent does disapproval go before it is classified as vitriolic hatred? If feminism wants to cement the idea that "men have oppressed women for thousands of years because they are barbarians", "all men are murderers", "men don't deserve private spaces, they will tolerate us whether they like it or not", is all this really disapproval or just savage hatred? Again, I agree with you that OP is taking the matter …
/r/MensRights14/12/23 12:06 AM
1

To my knowledge, a testosterone level that low would indicate either a bad diet, a chemical intrusion, or simply faulty blood-test. I'm not doctor however, so you might want to consult a doctor and ask as to why it's not within the healthy age range. For example, 300 level test is "normal" if you're 70 years old, but for your age at 30, it should be around the 500 mark.
/r/MensRights13/12/23 07:23 PM
2

Do you take any medications at this moment?
/r/MensRights13/12/23 04:15 PM
4

Can you define what constitutes traditional western values?
/r/MensRights12/12/23 08:52 PM
1

The coddling is just an empty gesture. How many people have told you: "let me know if you need anything!" They don't actually intend on following through with that.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/12/23 05:27 PM
3

To rephrase: if you're heterosexual and not aroused by a naked woman's body, then yes I guess you're hormonally imbalanced.
/r/MensRights12/12/23 02:40 PM
44

If you're heterosexual and aren't attracted to women's bodies, you likely have a hormone disorder. This Liberal ideology of infinite elasticity of "be whoever you want, whenever you want" that ignoring the intricacies of reality, needs to die.
/r/MensRights12/12/23 01:53 AM
9

Women are socially privileged; they have a social charisma that men lack, and for that they are criticized less. You are absolutely right, a man complaining about a lackluster dating culture is going to receive extremely hostile reactions, while a woman doing the same will receive consolidations and will see the blames shifted on men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/12/23 11:26 AM
8

It's "I don't need no man, but sure as hell want one." Social media is filled to the brim with women vehemently attacking the "current state of men."
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/12/23 11:24 AM
1

The rotten ones virtue signal the most.
/r/MensRights11/12/23 12:41 AM
8

Started? It's been that way since time immemorial.
/r/MensRights09/12/23 04:41 PM
84

Essentially, it's a play with words as a result of cognitive dissonance: "traditional masculinity", where the male is the a-priori leader of a relationship is denounced. However, chivalry is also an integral part of old societies' definition of masculinity, but modern feminists still hold a strong desire for men to enroll part of their doctrines. This is very ironic: feminists expect men to stand up for and defend them, while at the same time those men ought to respect and acknowledge women's au…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/12/23 03:25 AM
7

Alright then, new rule: If you challenge a male politician on a political stage in a debate you are a 'jacka**' with a 'man problem'
/r/MensRights07/12/23 05:52 PM
3

Now women are the most perfect, powerful, irreproachable beings in existence, while simultaneously being the most subjugated and vulnerable beings in existence. Every politician and corporation caters to them to no end, yet there is no demographic with less political and financial influence as them. I do agree that western societies are gynocentric, but I don't believe that they are inherently so. The primary focal point of power is capital (or wealth), since that is the basic unit of what an in…
/r/MensRights07/12/23 05:46 PM
6

Yes I see what you mean. I would point out that feminism did this inadvertently however, as it has made it abundantly clear that modern men ought to be ostracized should they refuse to adhere to gynocentric moralism.
/r/MensRights07/12/23 04:32 PM
20

It freed men from the oppression they didn't know they were under. Are you referring to the code of chivalry and duty towards war and that sort? Feminists are still adamant about men's bravery, but only when it suits their needs. No feminist gave a sh*t about the Ukrainian and Russian drafts for young men.
/r/MensRights07/12/23 03:33 PM
7

Because of the presumption that men are privileged. Like how it's controversial to talk about white people welfare in the US compared to black people (I know it's not the best equivalency, but my point is that people assume that men have it better in every-way possible, so inferring that men are suffering would only be acknowledged as greed.)
/r/MensRights06/12/23 06:10 PM
5

There's this myth that in the older times people ate meat as a staple in their diets and that's why they were healthier. This is not only extremely historically inaccurate, but it serves as a displacement for the real culprit for today's health problems which is capitalism - in which gigantic corporations are taking their leisure with growth-enhancing chemicals.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/12/23 01:37 AM
4

Let me guess, a < 5,000$ renumeration?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/12/23 05:17 PM
34

It's pretty obvious why: women are socially privileged over men.
/r/MensRights04/12/23 08:13 PM
4

I understand what you mean, but consider this: have you ever witnessed how aggressively defensive simp men become when you criticize their male feminism? It's almost impossible to walk someone through a theoretical understanding of what flaw encompasses their lifestyle. They can only learn that on their own through life experiences.
/r/MensRights04/12/23 04:32 PM
-11

Let's not interfere in people's personal lives, let natural selection do its thing.
/r/MensRights04/12/23 04:20 PM
40

Modern feminism is just conservatism, but without the respect for men, just the responsibilities. In other words, it's the worst of both worlds.
/r/MensRights03/12/23 10:17 PM
2

Just not buying into radical feminism is more than enough to support men's welfare.
/r/MensRights03/12/23 06:50 PM
29

The UN has been a joke of an organization for decades, and that goes beyond just their involvement in gender equality.
/r/MensRights02/12/23 11:15 PM
14

I've come to realize that -much like with any toxic ideology- not putting a stand against modern feminism will only further corrode society's morals.
/r/MensRights30/11/23 09:56 PM
-4

Calling yourself a lib doesn't make you one, the folks on that sub are rather authoritarian with a gynocentric orientation.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/11/23 02:30 PM
3

Why would a big portion of men's liberation coincide with misandry?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/11/23 03:45 AM
1

Just general observation honestly, the world's knowledge isn't difficult to grasp, it's just that we are often too emotional to accept certain realities.
/r/MensRights30/11/23 12:23 AM
58

At this point, I will interpret "women disproportionately affected" as "women should not experience harm, that's a man's role."
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/11/23 09:48 PM
1

"Traditionalism" is often a flawed concept: much of human nature remains unchanged. For instance, it would be faulty to say that respect for the elderly -as commonly as it was enforced in the older societies- is a "traditional" value, the reliance on the wisdom and experience of the older generations is pivotal for the survival of the contemporary societies.
/r/MensRights29/11/23 06:01 PM
2

Could have fooled me, I need to maintain ongoing CPD as part of my profession. I work AND dedicate my life to research. The two aren't mutually exclusive. Let me ask you this: Do you study and analyze data to conjure a thesis, or do you study the works of others? People who study this world from a purely theoretical and empirical standpoint (without practical implication of said data) are what I label as academics, and they're the ones who work as professors, are you one of them. Talk to me when…
/r/MensRights29/11/23 04:11 AM
6

I said academic fields are more likely to attract ivory tower dwellers. You're not an academic just because you have an education; an academic is someone who dedicates his life for research and thesis publishing. Even a bachelor's or even a master's won't make you a scholar. A suggestion: if you're going to present yourself as the intellectual here at least don't spew a foolish straw-man argument (you might want to learn how to use paragraphs as well).
/r/MensRights29/11/23 03:54 AM
5

Academia attracts bookish people who have little conception of the world beyond their ivory tower.
/r/MensRights29/11/23 02:12 AM
0

Your comments with certain terms often get shadow banned, it depends on specific subs apparently. Don't be sensitive.
/r/MensRights28/11/23 04:30 PM
-19

Well...for someone so innocent you seem to be taking it very personally. You have no need to get fucking angry over something if it doesn't apply to you. You might want to put some thought into this.
/r/MensRights27/11/23 05:43 PM
10

And that's exactly my point...modern dating is flawed.
/r/MensRights27/11/23 05:27 PM
-2

I get what you mean, but my main point was that people of both genders aren't prioritizing long term commitments on a practical basis, and this is sabotaging the healthiness of the relationships between men and women. Yes, wanting sex from a woman doesn't mean objectification, but I believe western societies by and large favor short term pleasures instead of long term sustainability, and this is reflected in modern dating.
/r/MensRights27/11/23 04:31 PM
-10

I don't want to be too quick to dismiss the theory of Autism prevalence amongst the inc*l community, but we certainly cannot underestimate the extent of the toxicity of modern dating: far too many men see women as sex objects, and women see men as validating admirers. Our pleasure-oriented societies leave little room for loyal long-term sentimental relations between men and women.
/r/MensRights27/11/23 02:49 PM
1

It's capitalism and it's social destruction, not just the tech. If anything the tech is a by-product of it all.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/23 02:05 AM
1

young women just have to bring themselves. Look I understand what you mean in the general topic, though I think you're gravely underestimating the importance of a woman's beauty and youth when finding a good man. Despite the degree of which women try to convince themselves; most women just aren't that attractive or young enough, certainly not enough for a masculine and loyal man to cherish them.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/23 02:04 AM
17

I see your point, though we have to take into consideration that free markets often prop up enormously wealthy few that are simply too powerful to continue permitting a democratic society; ironically, the free market itself is destined to become an unfree market based on its end results.
/r/MensRights26/11/23 03:41 PM
-1

I disagree with this logic; if a lawyer who owns a firm is too busy to learn how to cook that obviously doesn't make him a child, it just means that's not his specialty. Think of how many people can't mow the lawn for whatever reason they may have, you wouldn't automatically be a lazy loser in such a scenario provided that there is good reason.
/r/MensRights26/11/23 03:37 PM
2

Because according to feminists, you are allowed to express vulnerability only on politically correct topics.
/r/MensRights26/11/23 03:30 PM
62

Because I'm not interested in having right-wingers in power where they only prioritize corporate well-fare while slashing any sort of well-fare for the citizens. I prefer being economically left and socially conservative.
/r/MensRights26/11/23 03:28 PM
20

We found ourselves an account stalker.
/r/MensRights26/11/23 05:02 AM
76

Oh didn't you know? Criticizing women is a crime against humanity.
/r/MensRights25/11/23 10:23 PM
27

Women have always been the protected group, this protection has been expressed in numerous ways throughout history, and job quotas are just a few of them.
/r/MensRights25/11/23 05:40 AM
69

Man forget it. Hollywood is filled in its entirety by perverted out-of-touch trust fund babies. Rather than watching today's movies, I'd suggest you read literature from a time where men weren't weasels.
/r/MensRights24/11/23 11:55 PM
-4

That's capitalism for you; it brings out people's worst desires. Most of those movies/series that you mentioned are directed by men, and their expression of vulgarity and sexual masochism is a sign of their indulgence in modern consumerist hedonism. Our modern capitalist societies are so far engrained in the pursuit of pleasure rather than the aspiration for stability and dignity.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/11/23 10:21 PM
30

Feminism is just collective hysteria.
/r/MensRights24/11/23 03:38 AM
4

"So if a woman kills a another woman, it's not a crime?"
/r/MensRights24/11/23 01:31 AM
27

It's a cognitive bias.
/r/MensRights23/11/23 06:00 AM
10

It happens, but keep in mind that embittered people are more likely to be vocal. I'd bet that the women who have never been harassed by men far outnumber the anger comments posted, and they simply ignored the post, or at the very most liked a few comments and left without having anything to type about.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/11/23 11:38 PM
1

If you can't be happy alone, you won't be happy with anyone. Find your purpose in life that doesn't involve other people.
/r/MensRights22/11/23 05:42 PM
2

Watch them use subtle homophobic rants against male spaces, despite claiming to be the progressive liberal ones.
/r/MensRights22/11/23 02:36 PM
7

"So many men being in prison is a sign of the patriarchy's oppression of men by placing high expectations on them. Men must fight alongside feminists to smash the patriarchy."
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/11/23 08:56 PM
-14

I suspect it's because women buy smaller houses with less bedrooms than men.
/r/MensRights17/11/23 04:09 PM
96

Because Feminism is a discussion of women's welfare, it has nothing to do with what betters men.
/r/MensRights17/11/23 03:50 PM
33

Denial of discrimination of women (even historical) There is no doubt that women have been discriminated against throughout history. The only problem is that it's so often the case that when preaching of women's welfare against discrimination, all forms of sufferings related to men (present or historical) are completely denied existence, and their introduction often begets fierce hostility from feminists. Support for gender roles being natural While we ought to construct a society that maximizes…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/11/23 02:58 AM
1

Dude it's Reddit and specifically a subreddit dedicated for misandry and misogyny, do you think some classical Greek discourse is going to occur here? The men here are hateful losers and the women are ugly psychos.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/23 01:35 AM
–

You're right, but same goes for women. Most woman are either overweight or straight up donkey ugly, sucks to be them.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/23 01:34 AM
1

Well...USA and Italy are both capitalist countries. Can you try guessing which has a stronger middle class, work unions, and universal healthcare? Shouldn't be too hard.
/r/MensRights15/11/23 03:35 PM
9

I don't think it has to do with any Prussian morality, as this strong expectation on male success is cross-cultural: western, Arab, Japanese, etc... all cultures place great expectations on male success. Not to sound like a conservative, but it's good to place reasonable work and success expectations on both men and women; a healthy level of competition and hard-work is great for all human's development. However, I do see that the modern republican notion that we should live to work, as opposed …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/11/23 03:29 PM
1

Either a capitalist or a socialist. No middle ground to be found...
/r/MensRights15/11/23 01:53 PM
3

Welcome to capitalism.
/r/MensRights15/11/23 01:21 AM
20

This sub is one of the few men's rights platforms that hold genuine and serious discussions. Memes like this (even if they hold some truth) can delegitimize the authenticity of many of the conversations that take hold on this sub.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/11/23 03:08 AM
6

Meanwhile China and India's economy grow at an exponential rate... The western world is doomed.
/r/MensRights13/11/23 10:59 PM
1

No one is ever going to care, just work on yourself and improve your surroundings. A strong man can build the world that he wants.
/r/MensRights13/11/23 03:45 PM
1

Just vote for the right people.
/r/MensRights11/11/23 09:39 PM
36

"Society is built by men, for men" In such a case why are most suicides, homeless people, school dropouts, drug addicts, war victims, prison inmates, execution targets, and homicide victims male? "Exactly! That's why it's in men's best interest to deconstruct the patriarchy and abandon their masculinity." Notice the back-peddle here: their rebuttal to the statistics is a complete contradiction to the first statement: if the "patriarchy" favors men, why would it also oppress them as-well?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/11/23 05:23 PM
2

I honestly don't trust it. Same goes for bootlicking feminist men who are just seeking validation from women.
/r/MensRights11/11/23 05:17 PM
6

Modern liberalism is very much different than classical liberalism.
/r/MensRights10/11/23 03:17 PM
153

I still often wonder why Reddit seems to attract such a liberal and neurotic audience.
/r/MensRights10/11/23 04:57 AM
2

You know, there are plenty of emotionally healthy non-misandrist women worthy of marriage. But you're unlikely to find them in the western world.
/r/MensRights10/11/23 12:18 AM
16

If women don't want to be stared at, they should dress modestly. It's called accountability. Same goes for men, it's not a sexist issue at all.
/r/MensRights09/11/23 11:41 PM
1

Is it because Putin is also a male?
/r/MensRights08/11/23 07:44 PM
50

I personally have not found any leftist groups which give a damn about men's welfare besides this one.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/11/23 07:42 PM
-6

You are correct, but we must keep in mind that much like how most men aren't toxic, same applies to women; most of them aren't toxic.
/r/MensRights08/11/23 02:21 PM
1

Cold and warm approaching works great outside misandrist liberal societies. I love how the least sexually, socially and romantically experienced people People who use insults like this are usually the sexually inexperience ones themselves, it's called a projection.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/23 01:57 PM
1

"Most people met their significant others through existing social circles—school, college, work, hobby groups, or friends of friends." Exactly! And the initiation of these social circles, hobby groups, and friends took some cold-approaching. It's not like some angels from heaven grab the hands of two people and pull them closer to each other. Some cold-approaching, which takes the form of walking up to a stranger and saying, "hey, mind if I sit here?", has to take place for any relationship to s…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/23 01:19 PM
1

Most people met their significant others through existing social circles—school, college, work, hobby groups, or friends of friends. Exactly! And the initiation of these social circles, hobby groups, and friends took some cold-approaching. It's not like some angels from heaven grab the hands of two people and pull them closer to each other. Some cold-approaching, which takes the form of walking up to a stranger and saying, "hey, mind if I sit here?", has to take place for any relationship to sta…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/23 01:18 PM
35

The odd thing is, that country could either be western or not so; the contempt for young men's welfare is one of the very few characteristics that are shared by both rightist and leftist oriented peoples and cultures.
/r/MensRights07/11/23 11:55 PM
7

Screw the upper class.
/r/MensRights06/11/23 08:21 PM
1

Has this gynocentric attitude altered any bit since the introduction of Italy's current right winged government?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/11/23 02:45 PM
3

This is exactly the nonsense that comes out of modern feminism lmfao. As if you were to share your wife with other men that it would make you "secure" by not worrying; it's an absurd take on human psychology.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/11/23 09:56 PM
1

The sad part is that some sad simp will still marry them, only to be cheated on in favor of the type of guys those girls complain about. Good. That is only fair.
/r/MensRights03/11/23 05:24 PM
4

Western liberal societies are leftist on women's issues, but rightist on men's.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/11/23 11:06 PM
1

I think the unraveling of the global ecosystem is going to massively overshadow gender politics 20 years from now. It's going to begin with mass migrations of hundreds of millions of people The ecosystem changes that will unfold are very likely to be extremely gradual and noticeable only in the hind-sight of generations to come. What I predict is that the ecosystem changes will influence us in ways we may not notice at first glance. For example, we will likely start turning to more vegan diets; …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/11/23 01:30 AM
9

Very hard to tell. We barely know what could happen a year from now. However, for the most part, we can expect things to remain as they are but with slight changes. I forecast that USA's standard of life (economically) might decrease as more capital shifts away from the western world and more towards Africa and Asia (especially China and India). Tying this to gender dynamics, with modern feminism being an ideology born out of materialistic luxury, there will be less of a "men ain't shit" mentali…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/10/23 04:38 PM
–

My ex wife getting fat is what caused us to divorce Look at this frustrated lonely dude 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/23 11:02 PM
3

"The patriarchy gives us privileges, but that doesn't necessarily mean it's improving our wellbeing." Then how is it giving men privileges Exactly! The contradiction is so blatant; feminists claim that it's a patriarchy because men are in charge, and then claim that that same patriarchy is what oppresses men. Who needs logic when you can virtue signal right?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/10/23 02:48 PM
8

I'm not sure of what name this fallacy goes by, but attaching some extremist names to a movement to delegitimize it cannot be a reasonable argument. For instance, we certainly cannot label Muslims as terrorists simply by pointing to a group of radical jihadist groups. If course there are crazy pathetic feminists that are inclined to call men animals, but any feminist worth her words like Elizabeth Warren or Merkel would obviously be against such misandrist nonsense.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/10/23 03:46 PM
37

We would need to define feminism if we're to adequately discuss this. Modern feminism is really just women's indulgence in capitalist hedonism and power. It is vastly different than the old movement of tough factory-working women who sought to ensure their own safety and well-being.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/10/23 02:20 PM
17

While Men are physically privileged, women are socially privileged. We're likely to see our galaxy collide before societies comprehend this.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/10/23 02:06 AM
–

Life is not so clear-cut linear path: there is room to improve at all phases of life, and life absolutely isn't over just because you missed out on high-school fun. People who place a lot of emphasis on high-school are usually the ones who peaked in it and are now losers in society. You can be successful in your teenage years, 20s, 30s, 40s and beyond.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/23 12:17 AM
2

I don't know if all the men in power are like this. But how the fuck does the world run if everyone is catering to the egos of these men? Because those egotistical men possess certain skills that make them valuable to the economic machines. I like to call them the conscientious dim-wits: people who are highly specialized and knowledgable in a certain field of work, but are rather dim in almost all other walks of life.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/10/23 11:14 PM
16

Why is it that India is constantly getting labeled as a patriarchy? I hear horror stories on the indiatwoxchromosone sub.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/10/23 11:12 PM
6

All the above. They think men have it easier, because men are expected to put up with more shit. I think men just make it look easier, since dealing with more BS from social pressures pushed men to adapt and work harder at their jobs and social presence assertion.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/10/23 06:18 PM
15

Instead of "teaching boys to respect women", we should avoid such misandrist takes and opt to teach boys and girls to respect everyone.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/10/23 07:33 PM
1

Sounds like an absurdly rushed marriage.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/23 02:43 PM
1

if a 20 year old is with a guy who's 10+ years older than she is, she's almost certainly just with him because he has money and resources, rather than because she genuinely loves him. I'm noticing some self-contradiction here: if she would "genuinely love him", why would his age be a nuisance? Would it be any less shallow if a woman loved a man for his youth/looks compared to her attachment to him for his money and resources?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/23 02:39 PM
1

It's not the 30+ age that necessarily attracts women -in fact the older age will likely be a detriment- however, the drawback of an older age in men can be offset by the wealth, confidence, wisdom, and status that only older men possess, and some women are willing to make the tradeoff of dating an older man for the sake of enjoying the features that he built overtime.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/23 12:13 AM
12

I have yet to see a social media platform that holds as many idiots as Reddit does. Moreover, reddit isn't full of left-wingers as is commonly perceived; it is full of centrist liberals who alternate between left and right-wing doctrines depending on what suits their whimsical mood.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/10/23 11:49 AM
11

There was a study done in a Canadian high-school if I remember correctly; in it, researchers analyzed different ways of expressions of violence that manifest themselves across the male and female genders. What they found was that while men primarily resorted to physical violence to punish others, women used gossip and reputation destruction. What public perception often gets severely wrong, is its impression that "violence" is only a brute physical force; completely disregarding the psychologica…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/10/23 11:46 AM
11

It's important to distinguish between genuine feminism, and the toxic one: by "feminism" do we mean a thinking lens where we analyze problems that can be exclusive to women, and are largely ignored by men? Or is it simply thinly cloaked misandry that seeks to project a utopia upon the world where all forms of welfare, empathy, and attention are directed towards women exclusively? The feminism camp of the former can certainly be reasonable enough to care about the welfare of men in as much as the…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/10/23 02:56 AM
13

That wasn't my point. Putting aside legal implications, even countries -regardless of which specific one we choose to talk about- that have no conscription or selection service, or even an army to speak of such as the case in Iceland, would still drag you to a war if you happen to be a male. All this talk about celebrating male vulnerability gets tossed like a hot potato when an inevitable disaster eventually strikes society, whether natural (floods, wild-fires, etc), or man-made such as the cas…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/10/23 02:39 AM
11

Absolutely yes. Men present a masculine image that on one hand offers a feeling of protection for the children, but also ensures that they are challenged enough that they grow to be competent and capable adults.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/10/23 08:31 PM
45

That's damn true. If say the US or Canada were to get entangled in a war, there would undoubtedly be a burden of military service placed on men and the men who resist service would be labeled as "cowards". Feminism is not equality for men and women, it's power for women and destruction of men. Modern feminism is a luxury ideology. It is only until societies reach a level of wealth and comfort that allows for a mentality of "men ain't shit."
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/10/23 08:21 PM
104

"Those countries are patriarchal and are enforcing traditional gender norms on men through the conscription. This is why feminism fights for men just as much as it does for women." Or something along that line. On a serious note: yes it definitely is sexism against men, and what feminists don't acknowledge is that historical treatment of men and women often had many features that favored women at the mens' expense. The irony is in feminists' narcissistic prayer: "Societies are patriarchal and fa…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/10/23 08:16 PM
4

and while those in power have traditionally been men Elite circles have always comprised of women, and there is a plethora of historical writing to confirm this. Feminists are in severe denial of the power women have held throughout history.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/10/23 02:36 PM
13

Notice the narcissistic prayer of feminists when it comes to discussing men in power: "Leaders of societies are mostly male, so it's clear that our societies are inherently biased against women while favoring the success of men." "Well, yes most people who are seriously disaffected are indeed men....but that's because of the patriarchy that prioritizes traditional expectations thus disfavoring the success of men. So men should only blame themselves for supporting the patriarchy." There is no poi…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/10/23 12:16 PM
2

Positive masculinity is exactly the old chivalry code which is touted as "benevolent sexism". There is a blatant contradiction: traditional gender norms are attacked by feminist groups for being constrictive on human freedom, but those same feminists will label men's protective and chivalrous instincts as "positive masculinity", and will actively shame men who do not conform to such a standard. In other words: nowadays, men are expected to be strong traditional men, but without the respect/regal…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/10/23 01:23 PM
1

What I’m hearing from you is have no capacity to offer care to your kids? Cut the nonsense, I'd prioritize their happiness before mine. What needs to be noted here is that your care for others manifests in forms not noticeable in first sight. It seems to me that you care for your friends and family by being a people pleaser and never challenging them to go above and beyond, but the you may as well have not have not benefitted them as much as someone who prompted those under your care to actually…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/23 11:52 PM
1

You do realize my post is about how men treat their kids? I told him "you better learn to start showing love to your friends, family, and romantic partners or else you will not receive love and affection back. It's simple math." Yeah was it though? The proof speaks for itself. In any case, Children need a strong male figure who exhibits strictness: have a look at fatherless households, they are a prime building ground for failed children, because without a disciplining father there will never be…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/23 11:40 PM
1

No one is born apathetic; it's developed over time. Men reaching a point of not caring is a reactive result, not a proactive one. I speak for myself, but I've tried being a nice caring guy far too many times in my life, and it has invited aggression more than anything else every single time. This post is the typical advice men are always given: "man up and blame only yourself."
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/23 10:02 PM
27

Far too many "leftists" or Democrats in America are really just cement-skulled traditional republicans who virtue-signal leftist doctrines; but without actually acting out anything significant. This crooked politician serves as a stark example of this phenomenon.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/09/23 11:33 PM
–

This is a misogynistic dog-whistle. It's not a ideal equivalency between the users of a well-known social media and the basement-dwelling anime lovers. Imagine thinking 1-2 hours a day of instagram is the same as spending years obsessing with anime. It seems that within you lingers bitterness towards women, and you hating their innocent hobby is proof of that. Touch grass, or at least get therapy.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/23 08:42 PM
3

Purplepilldebate is a misogynist and misandrist echo-chamber cesspool. That place should not be taken seriously.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/09/23 07:17 PM
4

Well agreed, don't debate the idiots.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/09/23 05:22 PM
2

Most leftists don't have the critical thinking skills to call out phony leftist movements. Thus why a lot of leftists are tankies. Such fallacious pseudo-intellectuals are more accurately described as centrist-liberals living in their bubble, rather than critical leftists.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/09/23 12:42 PM
5

To say "men must work hard to ensure women's autonomy", it has essentially nullified that same autonomy being strived for when it is built by men's effort. The lack of self-awareness on these pseudo-liberals is astonishing.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/09/23 12:30 PM
5

Indeed It's a massive cognitive dissonance. Ironic how they claim to be the "educated liberals" while fuming their incoherent and contradictory arguments. To say "men must work hard to ensure women's autonomy", it has essentially nullified that same autonomy being strived for when it is built by men's effort.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/09/23 12:29 PM
1

It only gets better for men if and only if they put in the work; and most men simply don't do that.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/23 06:28 PM
1

This is nonsense, plenty of good loyal women out their, just depends on where a guy is looking.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/23 06:28 PM
-3

Nah, AI will make things worse, it'll let us men know about your bloody nasty vagina.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/23 12:00 AM
1

Lol dude you're just seething. Don't cry to me go to your therapist if you can't get laid "It's like being born rich" Lmao.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/23 06:51 PM
1

Lol it's funny how your expressing jealousy towards men who are richer than you and get women, you're seething because of your inability to get laid.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/23 05:51 PM
1

I've dealt your mother all the time, so yes I can confirm it's true.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/23 01:52 PM
1

....And you're still proving me right. quit cornering yourself moron.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/23 05:59 PM
1

Thanks for proving me right you moron 👍
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/23 05:47 PM
1

Ironically, that is something a narcissist would say. You quite called yourself out here dude.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/23 05:42 PM
1

That's interesting, I've never seen anyone talk like that. Ah, now I get it, you've got learning disabilities don't you? That explains the incoherent nonsense you're yammering on about. Your comment could be accurately rephrased as: This book was written by anonymous right wingers to use as a decoy that would ruin feminists' reputation in the eyes of men, all while making a lot of money. I know morons like you are slow, so I'm happy to help you out. 👍
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/23 04:51 PM
2

You do make a good point, however when I saw the book description on good-reads it seems to be a guide to women on protecting themselves from powerful men like Harvey Weinstein. Not saying you're wrong, You made a plausibility fallacy mistake The title is extremely inflammatory nonetheless, it should be "How to defend yourself against powerful men". Also, 20$ is too low for a bet dude, make it a 1,000
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/23 04:26 PM
1

Here you go little man: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/book
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/23 04:21 PM
2

Hey misogynists, if the Patriarchy isn't real, then explain this.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/23 03:32 PM
2

I see men marrying basic looking or fat women all the time and starting families with them. How old are these men, and what is their financial standing? It could be that they either don't have much options to marry or simply see marriage as a means to have instant sexual gratification rather than a meaningful bond.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/23 05:27 PM
1

It's a vicious circle. Men are expected not to show much emotions besides anger From who is this expectation from precisely? One could easily see that both ideological camps -conservative patriarchs and progressive liberals- despise any sort of male vulnerability. It's not that men are expected to not show emotions thus they turn to anger, rather it's more the case that as men age their natural response to problems is irritation rather than anything else. This sort of condition is unconscience o…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/23 10:29 PM
6

The average man is attracted to the average woman for short-term flings, but the standards start to shoot up when the man is considering marriage. You'll need to define what "attracted" means; is it to pump and dump or spend the rest of your life with someone?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/23 10:19 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter