TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Deansdale Archive

View 16 posts and 1,846 comments by Deansdale on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
177

Deansdale/r/MensRights19/12/12 01:08 PM
102

Social IssuesDeansdale/r/MensRights30/04/15 07:14 AM
100

Deansdale/r/MensRights26/03/13 09:10 AM
40

Deansdale/r/MensRights08/05/16 10:57 AM
27

DiscussionDeansdale/r/MensRights20/02/15 07:29 PM
18

Social IssuesDeansdale/r/MensRights26/05/16 10:29 AM
14

Deansdale/r/MensRights08/02/13 09:19 AM
13

Deansdale/r/MensRights22/02/13 03:26 PM
12

Deansdale/r/MensRights24/04/15 07:13 AM
10

Deansdale/r/MensRights18/12/12 09:31 AM
9

Deansdale/r/MensRights29/05/13 12:04 PM
7

Deansdale/r/MensRights06/03/13 08:46 PM
6

re: FeminismDeansdale/r/MensRights25/06/14 08:46 AM
2

DiscussionDeansdale/r/MensRights29/08/14 09:00 AM
1

FeminismDeansdale/r/MensRights13/02/17 09:20 AM
0

Social IssuesDeansdale/r/MensRights12/09/16 06:23 AM
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 1,846 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Adding insulin doesn't help at all here (well maybe temporary but it just makes it worse in the long run). Excpt when you actually go to a doctor who diagnoses you with T2D you will be prescribed drugs, some of which work by making your pancreas produce more insulin, smartass. DPP-4 inhibitors also drive your pancreas to create more insulin. It's common practice among doctors to prescribe such drugs and tell patients to eat carbs with them to avoid hypoglycemia. Not all doctors advise patients t…
/r/TheRedPill24/06/21 08:47 PM
1

Please learn proper english ffs, it's impossible to decypher half your comment. Also, you're absolutely wrong about the other half. insulin sensitivity is mainly a function of calorie intake Nope, insulin production is controlled by blood sugar levels, and if you don't regularly 'overdose' on carbs your insulin sensitivity will be fine. Eating lots of proteins and fats won't fuck up your insulin sensitivity. The reason people are fat is not because eating less and moving more doesnt work. It's b…
/r/TheRedPill24/06/21 08:31 PM
1

I'm talking about the political group calling themselves progressives while you're talking about the dictionary definition of the word. If you think people who call themselves progressives want "liberties for all" you're in for a rude awakening.
/r/MensRights09/11/19 06:34 PM
11

I'm not angry about this one commercial, I'm just weary of the relentless flood of progressive propaganda pushed on us from all directions, something this is a small part of.
/r/MensRights08/11/19 05:38 PM
11

In theory you're absolutely right and on an abstract human level I agree. Sad truth is we live in a reality where things draw certain consequences regardless if we like them or not. Cry in front of women and most of them will see it as a sign of you being a pussy, and they will think less of you for it. It's in their instincts, they don't even know that their subconscious works like that. This is just one example of how acting feminine is a bad idea for men. This is the way things are, it was no…
/r/MensRights08/11/19 04:36 PM
27

Gillette denigrated masculine men, Nivea celebrates feminine men, and the message is the same: men, be more feminine. Thanks, but no thanks. I don't want woke companies to try to influence me in any way, shape or form, I don't even want them to "celebrate" me, they should care about their products and not "social issues".
/r/MensRights08/11/19 03:54 PM
5

This is postmodern identity politics bullshit aimed at bamboozling idiots into thinking they should identify with fictional characters based on race/sex/sexuality so strongly that they should take offense when said fictional characters are hurt or killed. The very core of this notion is retarded in that it fails to recognize the distinction between fiction and reality, and/or takes works of fiction as statements of some sort of intent from the authors.
/r/MensRights08/10/17 02:21 PM
1

In the name of progress, Harvard University will segregate graduation ceremonies based on race Hurray for progressivism!
/r/MensRights09/05/17 11:40 AM
1

I was wrong then :) Keep up the good work!
/r/MensRights08/05/17 06:41 AM
-1

I would have thought that it's the default stance of the men's rights movement to find SJW bullshit like dear white people or that Bill Nye fuckup not to our liking. We aren't arguing about my personal taste here, in case you didn't notice, we're discussing how Netflix have rejected The Red Pill, which is another sign that it's drifting to the left. Now, it's up to you to determine if you think Soros' involvement affected Netflix or not, but it's a fact that he's known for his tendency to manipu…
/r/MensRights07/05/17 03:32 PM
6

Progressives means someone advocating or implementing liberal ideals/social reform. That's the dictionary definition, but we both know that in general use the word refers to a specific set of beliefs and ideas that are closely tied to the modern left. This reminds me of feminists defending feminism by pointing to its dictionary definition... But you know what, let's skip the bullshit altogether and let me rephrase my original statement: Ever since Soros bought a sizeable chunk of netflix stocks …
/r/MensRights07/05/17 03:05 PM
-11

I consider myself liberal and very progressive. Look, we can do this in one of two ways. You can pretend not to know that nowadays "progressivism" means hating and attacking whites, men, christians, heterosexuals, republicans, conservatives, nationalists and whatnot in the name of political correctness. This is what progressive courses teach at universities and this is what progressive political parties campaign with - see the US election last year. If you insist this isn't so then there's nothi…
/r/MensRights07/05/17 01:11 PM
16

Funny how nowadays "progress" is measured by how much one hates people belonging to groups political correctness doesn't protect.
/r/MensRights07/05/17 12:27 PM
18

It might be a coincidence for all I care, fact is that netflix is drifting to the left, and I mean the modern left, ie. the let's hate men/whites/heteros identity politics bullshit.
/r/MensRights07/05/17 12:22 PM
3

Why has everyone forgotten about male suffrage? Because the mainstream narrative is gynocentric and ~90% of people are blind enough to believe anything they're told. Thinking is a luxury most people can't or won't afford.
/r/MensRights07/05/17 09:37 AM
17

Ever since Soros bought a sizeable chunk of netflix stocks it's becoming ever more progressive. It's time for decent people to cancel their subscriptions.
/r/MensRights07/05/17 09:23 AM
8

Ever since Soros bought a sizeable chunk of netflix stocks it's becoming ever more progressive. It's time for decent people to cancel their subscriptions.
/r/MensRights07/05/17 09:23 AM
1

God bless ya'
/r/MensRights07/05/17 09:19 AM
3

Unexpected, worrisome finding: Boys injured more in mixed units than in all male ones. Unexpected my ass, it was foretold by tons of people because this is obvious as fuck. We men have it in our instincts to help & protect women, which makes mixed military units a nightmare. It's only unexpected to those idiots who bought the feminist bullshit that men and women are the same. What a stupid world we live in...
/r/MensRights07/05/17 09:11 AM
1

Yeah, I get it, and I'm not saying you should give a free pass to the right. If you can spare me a minute... The right as a concept has been demonized for decades, just like men. The overton window has been shifted to the left and this resulted in tons of decent people growing a sympathy for the left and distrusting the right, and these people now don't find their place in modern politics, as progressives (like the dem party in the US) do not represent the original leftist values. Hence the desi…
/r/MensRights07/05/17 07:37 AM
1

has it occurred to you that 95% of men aren't interested in one sided, sexual relationships with children? First of all, teens of legal age are not "children". And many men would be interested in sex with beautiful young women if it was possible, believe me. Many are paying huge sums for it, sometimes risking prison, what would they do if it was for free and readily available? Yeah, 95% was a poetic exaggeration, but not by much. not aware of the trope of a 21 year old loser hanging around 16~ y…
/r/MensRights06/05/17 07:28 PM
2

If it would be real ~95% of adult men would do nothing else in life but hang around girls just over the legal age to woodoo them into sex. It just doesn't work. Most teenagers view most adult men as old and creepy, regardless of their authority or whatever. Male teachers seducing their pupils is rare as heck, most teachers don't have a fling like that in their entire careers. Female teachers have an "advantage" in this regard, if you can call it that, but it has nothing to do with authority. It'…
/r/MensRights06/05/17 06:06 PM
2

This 'power dynamics' argument has always struck me as absolute bullshit, as using any form of power to get sex is already illegal, it's called coercion. Try using your authority to seduce teenagers and see where it gets you without coercing them. (Hint: they'll laugh at you.) You can't use your imaginary "adult powers" to seduce teenagers who otherwise don't find you attractive. This 'power dynamic' narrative is just another anti-male myth demonizing male sexuality, making people believe that e…
/r/MensRights06/05/17 06:58 AM
3

It's official: two teenage males were unjustly scapegoated by right-wing ideologues looking to score political points. Yeah, and the MRM shouldn't try to do the same, injecting even more partisan politics into this discourse. I don't think the attitude of the modern left was any better, covering their eyes and ears like nothing happened because brown people raping white women doesn't fit their narrative. Maybe partisan politics should be kicked out of police investigations and the justice system…
/r/MensRights06/05/17 06:49 AM
2

Well, technicaly, the court said it was rape, it's just that the guy had no way of knowing it as the woman appeared to consent. I wouldn't call this a false accusation as that implies the accuser knows no rape happened or that the accused wasn't the perpetrator. "Explicit consent" is still buillshit though.
/r/MensRights06/05/17 06:43 AM
1

"Rape culture" the term was invented by men's advocates who were concerned about prison rape. I highly doubt that as 100% of the people using the term are feminists referring to western cultures condoning the rape of women (which is of course bullshit, but still). It's even taught in feminist/gender studies courses as such. although we may be able to correctly describe some ideas and expectations within our culture as rape-enabling There is literally nothing in western cultures that would "enabl…
/r/MensRights05/05/17 12:53 PM
5

Anything saying that women shouldn't be allowed to have an opinion on something. Don't tell me you can't imagine the hypothetical situation itself until you can find an example that is a perfect fit for it...
/r/MensRights05/05/17 12:47 PM
8

Whatever feminists say about rape culture in general, which are all lies, are absolutely true about their own stance on the rape of men. To say that the rape of women is ignored/condoned/encouraged by culture is absolutely retarded, but sure as hell it's true about the rape of men. So, when commenters say this guy's case is ignored because rape culture, they're perfectly right, it's the feminist rape culture that ignores the rape of men. It's clear as daylight that a woman with the same story wo…
/r/MensRights05/05/17 09:09 AM
2

If we'd live in a sane world postsecondary programs that have literally zero usefulness to society/civilization would not be accredited in the first place, or have their accreditation revoked. Too bad we live in a world where politicians want society to be divided and gender studies (among other things) is a perfect tool to achieve that. Fixing things at this point is nigh impossible, it would require a gargantuan effort from the silent majority. Progressives would fight to the death to preserve…
/r/MensRights05/05/17 09:01 AM
21

She has it bass ackwards, sexbots offer women more independence. How could she get any more independent than being totally ignored by men?
/r/MensRights05/05/17 08:40 AM
11

If you want to live in a society where potential fathers are totally ignored and aren't allowed to even have an opinion on what happens to their own children, be their guest. I guess we're at a point where this is considered absolutely normal, even some men's rights activists think that men should have no reproductive rights whatsoever. He should've kept it in his pants, right? You know, if they said the ultimate decision, just like the responsibility that comes with it, should be the woman's, t…
/r/MensRights05/05/17 08:26 AM
3

All three paths are right. There's nothing mutually exclusive in any of them, you can follow all three at the same time. There are 2 common misconceptions: 1. TRPers don't enjoy or exploit the current situation, they just want to have relationships in an environment that forces them to employ certain tactics to fulfill their human needs; 2. "Going your own way" actually means setting your own goals and not letting others selfishly replace those goals with their own - at its core it has nothing t…
/r/MensRights03/05/17 08:19 AM
1

Can I point you to all the 'take the Red Pill' taglines used by AVfM as counterpoint? Which is a reference to the movie, not the subreddit, for pete's sake. Widen your horizons. I was a PUA blogger when Roissy was still called Roissy, but hey, what do I know. A good 60% of what MRAs take for granted, is knowledge that came from guys like Roosh, Rollo, and Roissy. That's a stretch. MRAs in general don't give a hoot about female nature or getting laid, they care about laws. The bulk of RP knowledg…
/r/MensRights03/05/17 08:10 AM
5

Advocating that men attempt to assert their own desires over the women they date, even when said desires are in direct conflict with the desires of those women, is misogynistic because it disregards those interests as being of lesser importance. No, it's called being selfish, and it has nothing to do with hating women. You go out of your way to overcomplicate things and make men look bad by ascribing nefarious motivations to them when they just want to have sex. Also, generally speaking women ar…
/r/MensRights03/05/17 07:47 AM
2

Why on Earth would they want to help men? They see us as oppressors. That's the only common thread in all types of feminism, the idea that men oppress women, so why do you expect the believers of that ideology to want to help the bad guys? I have heard some feminists pay lip service to helping men, but I have never seen even one who actually wanted to do it - except for Christina Hoff Sommers who was ousted from the movement by other feminists for that exact reason.
/r/MensRights02/05/17 07:24 AM
40

When feminists point to TRP and say that's the MRM they are intentionally muddying the waters, they do that on purpose to mislead outsiders. Also, Cassie Jaye naming her documentary about the MRM 'The Red Pill' didn't help in this regard. As a side note, apart from having nothing to do with men's rights I see no problem with the article. I bet many people would call this misogyny, because they're idiots.
/r/MensRights02/05/17 07:19 AM
1

None of the high profile trans people in my country were murdered. To be honest this hush-hush-murder notion seems overblown to me, just like all other progressive attacks on non-PC groups: they say women were treated like slaves because men hate women, blacks are oppressed because whites are racists, and of course cis-heteros hate LGBT people and want to kill them for no apparent reason. I've lost faith in these types of accusations long ago. It seems we reached the point where it's best to agr…
/r/MensRights02/05/17 06:41 AM
1

Tons of them probably go unseen in their school years. Even if the 1/500 guess is correct, 'tons' seems extreme :) All I can say is what I touched earlier: 20 years ago the entirety of the trans phenomenon was just a couple of cross-dressers in major cities - and I know that cross-dressing isn't the same as being trans, but still, everybody knew what homosexuals, bisexuals and transsexuals were, and there were tons of LGB's, but T's were exceedingly rare. I have never known, or even heard of a s…
/r/MensRights02/05/17 05:36 AM
1

They do not necessarily know the right numbers themselves, it's not like some magical knowledge all transgender/transsexual people have by default. They get their information from statistics gathered by others, just like everyone else. And call me cynical but I still think 1 in 500 is way too much, that would mean dozens even in smaller towns, which is quite unrealistic. Well, maybe if they include all the miserable kids whose parents/teachers brainwash into believing that if they like toys usua…
/r/MensRights01/05/17 07:07 PM
1

You can rest assured not everyone at that event was actually trans, and by trans I mean people whose brains are biologically wired like the opposite sex'. What I know for sure is that 20 years ago (before the progressive campaign) trans people were exceedingly rare, and not because they hid fearing lynch mobs or something. One in a million might be hyperbole, but not by much - I doubt it's anywhere near 1 in 500. You probably got that "information" from the progressive crowd. And even if it woul…
/r/MensRights01/05/17 04:17 PM
4

Fuck this trans bullshit altogether, it's nothing more than a progressive divide and conquer tactic. Actual trans people, you know, who don't just do it because it's trendy or fits their narrative, are one in a million, and should be helped discreetly. The "trans issue" is a complete waste of time and resources and only serves to sic people on each other so we fight amongst ourselves instead of dealing with actual issues (like making the family courts fair). Apart from this, if trans people feel…
/r/MensRights01/05/17 12:10 PM
3

Absolutely not. You're basing your opinion on a couple of snippets that you have intentionally chosen to show RoK and TRP in a bad light. If I did the same with another community you'd say I have prejudices about them, and you'd probably be right. Your opinion on TRP is sketchy and biased, and you know this, but you're okay with it as it is needed to keep your worldview intact. If you'd take your time to form a more grounded opinion you'd have to rethink a lot of things. You came here to look fo…
/r/MensRights26/04/17 06:26 PM
4

You almost got it right. then laugh at the stupid blue pills! A "blue piller" is one who follows anti-TRP methods or attacks TRP - it's not how TRPers refer to the average guy. It's important to know that the entire PUA-sphere was created to help hapless men, not to ridicule them. TRPers don't compare themselves to other men and couldn't care less about what other men think of them - their sole focus is better relationships with women. They only care about "blue pillers" insofar as they're relev…
/r/MensRights26/04/17 11:51 AM
4

Sorry, it's about feelings, because it's also about opinions. This doesn't make any sense. My first guess is you're not a native english speaker, the second is that you have a strong emotional opinion on TRP that prevents you from forming coherent thoughts about it. Also, please cut out the pseudo-marxist post-modern bullshit about how everything is just opinions and nothing is objective. It makes all conversation with you literally meaningless as no common point, no truth, no compromise could b…
/r/MensRights26/04/17 11:05 AM
4

Reading the comments I learned two things: MRAs are not immune to the phenomenon of forming opinions based on second hand information, which is quite strange in this case because they adopt the opinions of those who also say that MRAs are mysygynystyc trash; wanting to have sex with women and adapting to women's (subconscious) expectations to achieve this goal equals hatred of women. Is there anybody out there who wants to have an actual discussion that involves facts, arguments and a desire for…
/r/MensRights26/04/17 10:51 AM
35

I get the sentiment but we actually need Hillary's idiotic quote to stay alive for all eternity, to show people what feminism actually is.
/r/MensRights23/04/17 08:44 AM
5

30 years ago nobody would have bat an eye if a man took pictures on a playground, they would have automatically assumed his child is there, or at worst he's taking pictures for an article about kids or something. The current pedo/rape hysteria is the product of hardcore feminist anti-male propaganda telling people men should be viewed with suspicion. This needs to be reversed if we want to live in a sane society. It's not okay to believe that the only problem in your situation was that you did n…
/r/MensRights22/04/17 01:35 PM
6

Can you tell me how children are harmed by pictures taken on the playground? You of all people should know best that not everyone near a playground with a phone/camera in their hands is a child molester. The freakin' paranoia about child abductors hiding behind every bush is absolutely unwarranted.
/r/MensRights22/04/17 10:50 AM
1

I would've laughed at you a month ago, but then the fact-checking thing was transparent as fuck. Apparently it's still not transparent enough for some people. Widespread censorship and suppression of ideas on the net (twitter, facebook, google, reddit, etc.) is not a good enough reason for them to admit it's a politically/ideologically motivated campaign coming from the progressive side. I know it's hard to believe, really hard, but it's still true for pete's sake - sooner or later everybody mus…
/r/MensRights22/04/17 07:32 AM
0

Stop using google, the progressives have turned it into a weapon against the unsuspecting public. Use DuckDuckGo or some other search engine instead.
/r/MensRights21/04/17 01:38 PM
3

When he said this he wasn't either.
/r/MensRights19/04/17 11:10 AM
1

lol
/r/MensRights18/04/17 04:00 PM
14

She intentionally hindered the cognitive development of all the boys in her care as a kindergarten teacher for the sole reason she hates boys. In my book it's reason enough to go to jail. If a white kindergarten teacher tried sabotaging the mental development of black kids BLM would literally lynch her if it got to her before the authorities, who would surely charge her with a couple of hate crimes.
/r/MensRights18/04/17 03:58 PM
3

The student union has repeatedly accused the Men’s Interest Awareness society of being linked with or associated with… a group called a Voice for Men You know people are disingenuous when they don't judge others based on what they say, but on who they are "associated with" according to outsiders. They can't show anything objectionable in MIAS's materials so MIAS must be undermined through associating it with something extreme. (Which AVFM is not, by the way.)
/r/MensRights18/04/17 12:50 PM
36

People like this should be jailed and never allowed near children again.
/r/MensRights18/04/17 12:36 PM
15

the whole idea of feminism is basically "equality" for women in areas where they're disadvantaged You're still too charitable. If you want to know what feminists mean by equality you only need to read this: Among the four equality categories WEF uses to rank countries, the U.S. ranked lowest in health and survival. While women outlive men by an average of about six years in OECD countries, American women outlive their male counterparts by just about three years, which hurt its ranking, said Zahi…
/r/MensRights17/04/17 06:17 PM
8

The idiot at least openly admits that feminism is a leftist movement. But confusing antifeminism with conservatism... And the sub is named BadSocialScience. What a fuckin' farce.
/r/MensRights17/04/17 06:12 PM
17

Better to be punished for recording a lier than go to jail on false rape charges.
/r/MensRights17/04/17 10:30 AM
3

Are women treated worse than men for the most part? LoL no. Women aren't harassed more, feminists just try to turn innocent human communication into harassment for political purposes. It's patently obvious in videos like 10 hours of walking in NYC, where even saying "hi" is shown as harassment. Women aren't looked down on in general, in fact they're quite comfortable on their pedestal. The entertainment industry and the legacy media is unquestionably pro-women to the point of being openly anti-m…
/r/MensRights17/04/17 10:12 AM
1

What is there to debunk? The article clearly proves that there's no overarching discrimination against women, there are lots of fields where they earn more than men. (The article forgot to mention modeling, porn and the beauty industry in general where women also outearn men quite spectacularly.) Seeing how some fields prefer men and others prefer women saying it's entirely anti-women is retarded. The simplest explanation is that employers are paying their employees based on the value they produ…
/r/MensRights17/04/17 09:44 AM
5

Last time this topic was brought up I gave a detailed answer in a calm, patient manner. This time I don't have the patience to do so. It is retarded to think that wealthy people are faithful soldiers of the capitalist worldview just because they have money, and what they do is necessarily against the political left. (Look at the latest US election: the left's candidate was a megarich corporatist endorsed by Wall Street. How does that fit into your mindset?) What the rich want is to stay in power…
/r/MensRights16/04/17 10:25 AM
4

Supposedly "moderate", "pro-male", feminist There's no such thing. Either they believe the total bullshit of patriarchy theory, men oppressing women and whatnot - in which case they're useful idiots spreading hate for their masters, like Joanna here -, or they don't, which makes them outcasts in the feminist movement like Christina Hoff Sommers, for not hating men enough.
/r/MensRights16/04/17 10:04 AM
3

They're pointing out that women are paid less for the same jobs. Which is true. It's not true, that's the whole point of the entire debate. The 77 cents bullshit feminists advertise is strictly on average across all fields, it's not a comparison of people working in the same jobs. Even more-honest-than-average feminists admit this. If anyone in the west would knew of a case where a woman earns less because sexism they could instantly sue because that's illegal since the 60's.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/04/17 10:24 AM
1

We've always known that there are lots of well-meaning people out there who call themselves feminists only because they don't know what feminism actually stands for. They're useful idiots duped by the good PR of feminism.
/r/MensRights13/04/17 07:37 AM
4

He should modify his own statue to include a guy sticking his dick in "little girl's" mouth and then see how feminist opinions change about artistic integrity and whatnot.
/r/MensRights13/04/17 07:26 AM
11

No, it's sad that people are so stupid they can't interpret the simplest of concepts. There's a statistic out there that this cartoon explains elegantly, yet there are hundreds of people commenting and downvoting here who can't wrap their minds around it.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/04/17 06:47 AM
2

ROTFL No, it explains that men and women earn different wages because men and women choose different jobs. Women do earn the same money for the same work, they just tend to choose not to do the same work as men because that's dangerous, icky, tiresome, demanding, low status, and so on. Men earn more because men are willing to accept jobs women are not.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/04/17 06:43 AM
1

If you can explain what's "anti women" in explaining the reason behind a statistic I'll give you a thousand dollars.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/04/17 06:35 AM
2

The Clintons would make her disappear for 1/100th of that donated to their foundation.
/r/MensRights12/04/17 06:42 AM
3

All these new technologies should have made women a lot happier. Instead, they seem to be more unhappy than ever. Go figure. I reckon that has something to do with society telling them their whole lives that men hate and oppress them. If you keep hearing long enough that you could have, and should have, a better life, only some people who hate you robbed you of it, you might turn sour. It's even worse when the same mentality poisons the greatest source of joy in your life, your intimate relation…
/r/MensRights09/04/17 05:15 PM
3

the role of women had to change, just like the role of men Well, it's not so much that they "had to change", it's more like the advancements in technology and industry made the original setup somewhat obsolete. Most people could still live according to traditional gender roles (they still "work") and it wouldn't hurt anyone. Yes, we have more freedoms now, anyone can do anything, but most people can't use this freedom to their own benefit. If anything they're confused by the lack of clear standa…
/r/MensRights09/04/17 03:18 PM
1

No, I think I'm an assclown too tired and annoyed to be polite this afternoon. This still doesn't mean you couldn't improve your views if you'd listen to what I say. Look, sooner or later you have to realize that truth is more important than tone, help yourself become a better person by making this realization right now and then assessing my arguments on their worth instead of your impression of my worth. Looking for excuses to dismiss valid arguments will never help you advance, ever.
/r/MensRights09/04/17 02:38 PM
0

Do you like House in the TV show? Do you think he's arrogant but insightful? It's a lot more annoying when it happens to you, and not somebody on the screen, right? Look, I know I sound hostile, and that it doesn't make the conversation easier, but you can still choose to ignore the fluff and address the meaning, if you want to. No skin off my back if you don't. People generally tend to defend their egos by looking for excuses and ignoring the content that might shed some light on their own fall…
/r/MensRights09/04/17 01:49 PM
3

The entire narrative about how "women didn't have the right to vote" is bullshit. It's like believing in Santa Clause.
/r/MensRights09/04/17 01:41 PM
1

It's your choice if you focus on the meaning or the tone of my words. I wanted to make a bet with a friend of mine that you will choose to ignore the meaning and stick with the tone. You almost made me $5.
/r/MensRights09/04/17 01:39 PM
2

Because women often get the short end of the stick, especially in certain countries. If by "often" you mean more times than men do, then it's a lie. Pretty much all societies were (and still are) set up to protect and pamper women utilizing men's work and sacrifice. You can of course prove I'm wrong by showing a country where women have it bad, but men have it good, and not just in some specific minor details, but overall. Anywhere you look you'll see cultures where if women have it bad, men hav…
/r/MensRights09/04/17 01:34 PM
2

I'm a feminist, and several of my friends are. We do not stand for any of that garbage. And, pardon me for saying this but, you're so astonishingly stupid and arrogant that you think YOU'RE THE MAINSTREAM, and not Hillary, Valenti, Sarkeesian, etc? What the fuck is wrong with you? You and a couple of your friends are "good feminists", so feminism is good, despite you not even having a voice in the movement that is led by liers, deceivers, and misandrists? I say this as an honest attempt at helpi…
/r/MensRights09/04/17 12:51 PM
3

Minority? Yeah, this is obvious bullshit. Radical feminism is the mainstream, lead by the likes of Hillary, Obama and Biden (of VAWA fame) in politics, and Valenti, Marcotte & co. in the media. There's nothing moderate about mainstream feminism - actually they kick out moderates like Christina Hoff Sommers exactly for being too moderate. This piece of information should tell you everything you need to know about mainstream feminism.
/r/MensRights09/04/17 12:43 PM
1

You know, if someone takes pride and pleasure in persecuting you, but their enemies don't, you probably should side with the latter. The right isn't perfect, but sure as hell it's a better choice than the left at this point. The political left has entirely dissolved into virtue signalling and identity politics bullshit, there's nothing in it worth salvaging.
/r/MensRights09/04/17 12:37 PM
3

That's pure feminist bullshit, lies and misdirection. Most of the brothels in the 'wild west' were owned by the madams. The laws stating that upon marriage the property of the wife was merged into the husband's served the wife's interest. Feminism never did anything good, it just brainwashed you with its PR material about its own greatness. From the very beginning feminism was a tool of creating division between the sexes by demanding all the rights but none of the responsibilities of men be giv…
/r/MensRights09/04/17 12:25 PM
8

You mean the laws defining who had the right to vote changed constantly for about a hundred years, and for ~10 of those years most men could vote but most women couldn't? And you fail to mention how those men EARNED their right to vote by serving in the army? And you also fail to mention how TO THIS DAY men still have to EARN their right to vote in the US by enlisting, while women have the same right for free? Which means women have had the right to vote for about a hundred years now, but men st…
/r/MensRights09/04/17 12:15 PM
3

You're in a bad position my friend because progressives have hijacked the left, and nowadays the left is associated with identity politics instead of its orginial values like compassion for the poor. If you're not a cultural marxist you have to explain over and over again how you're not that kind of a leftist... Exactly like naive feminists explaining they're not that kind of feminists. The problem is the same in both cases: the representation of your camp in the political sphere is totally that…
/r/MensRights09/04/17 11:54 AM
3

why so many "primitive" cultures treat women badly They don't treat their women badly, you just think they do with your (post-)modern western mindset. No cultures are built on the idea of "let's make women suffer because chauvinism", they only differ in their ideas of what is beneficial for women. Yes, even FGM was dreamt up to benefit women, even if you can't believe that thanks to your worldview. men are allowed and often do beat women That's mostly a myth. In most cultures people didn't think…
/r/MensRights08/04/17 08:54 AM
1

Please stop pretending there's a "good feminism" out there, it was a marxist plot to begin with. The "declaration of sentiments" was published in the same year, and was modeled after the communist manifesto for Christ's sake. Anybody believing that feminism ever was a movement for actual equality between the sexes is a useful idiot duped by politically motivated scam artists trying to create division between the sexes for their own advantage. For every naive "good feminist" out there there are a…
/r/MensRights08/04/17 08:36 AM
1

There is a difference between some unfairness and outright oppression. Just because it snows in Kansas you wouldn't say it's an arctic country. Feminists also cite some things they claim are unfair towards women, does it mean both men and women are oppressed now? By whom?
/r/MensRights08/04/17 08:13 AM
1

Oppression is either plainly described in the laws of a country, or it's practiced as well-known and wide-spread societal customs that result in loss of property, bodily harm, or death. Christians in muslim countries are oppressed as if they don't keep their mouths shut they will be killed. That's oppression. In the west there is zero oppression, and claiming there is is pure postmodern, identity politics bullshit. That some people tell you mean things (the prime example of what progressives ref…
/r/MensRights08/04/17 08:06 AM
2

If 93% of workplace deaths were black people, we'd have no problem at all understanding that society is deeply and institutionally racist. Nope. Numbers are just numbers, without understanding and proving the reasons behind those numbers you can't just assume their meanings. Way too many people are victims of this bullshit mentality, thinking that a piece of numerical data is itself proof of a theory. Like, if only x% of congress members are women then women are oppressed. This is nonsense. Femi…
/r/MensRights08/04/17 07:45 AM
1

You mean an ex-feminist, like most MRAs?
/r/MensRights06/04/17 07:54 AM
2

We can't and shouldn't. Read this.
/r/MensRights06/04/17 07:53 AM
1

It could have been his son, any number of new male characters, or they could have just let him die without an obvious replacement. There was zero need for him to be replaced by a woman. So, are you sure you're not just mad that there's women involved? Yeah, fuck you. Are you people retarded, or just trolling r/MR? I have explained my argument in detail at least 10 times now, please stop pretending to be idiots incapable of understanding basic arguments. The last place I thought would be full of …
/r/MensRights05/04/17 01:19 PM
1

You're just like a feminist More shaming attempts :D Your entire point is that facts do not matter. No, my point is that the zeitgeist itself is poisoned, we live in a culture that is ruled by the progressives. The feminist intrusion into the entertainment industry made even innocent attempts at introducing SFCs look like just another feminist victory, plus the market is currently oversatured with SFCs like crazy. What is in this argument that's hard to understand? I told you at least 5 times al…
/r/MensRights05/04/17 01:12 PM
4

That was a minor detail with an explanation attached, I think you're taking it way too seriously and somewhat out of context. Even if the daughter of Wolverine is not a feminist-inspired grrrl power Mary Sue character (like Rey was in SW7), looking at the bigger picture, she's still a cog in the machine that is ruining the entertainment industry. The filmmakers had an infinite number of choices for who to replace Wolverine with, and for some reason they decided it should be a kickass woman. Grea…
/r/MensRights04/04/17 04:58 PM
5

I'm not saying it wasn't a good movie - I haven't seen it yet but surely will. I'm saying it's an unwritten rule in showbiz nowadays that practically every movie, game, TV series, book, comic, etc. must include at least one female protagonist, and they must be kickass characters treated politically correctly at all times. This is an intrusion of an ideology into the entertainment industry, and this is why companies infected with this bullshit (like Marvel) are bleeding customers. The fact that t…
/r/MensRights04/04/17 03:01 PM
-3

You missed the point completely, which is strange because I spelled it out in my first sentence. I don't give a rat's ass about the backstory of this character, if she will replace Wolverine in the upcoming movies then those movies will be less entertaining for me. Not because the actress is a woman (duh), but because we already have an SFC overload. At this point I'm fed up with female characters kicking male asses, I'm simply not interested in any more of those. It was fascinating in the '80s …
/r/MensRights04/04/17 02:52 PM
2

The NYT is cancer. The main picture on the page is already vomit-inducing. The first paragraph already starts the attacks on Trump and men. The article assumes that gender equality means voting for a woman regardless of the circumstances. It assumes that there are correct and incorrect views on gender roles, instead of accepting that everybody should be allowed to choose whatever they like, and if someone likes the traditional way, that's not wrong or "unequal". The entire article is utter bulls…
/r/MensRights04/04/17 12:05 PM
1

Maybe I used a more cheritable definition than you. "Bribing" children with gifts and whatnot into some form of depraved sex act while the child doesn't know what's going on is of course highly immoral and illegal, as it should be. What I was talking about is trying to woo teenagers who know what sex is into having sex with you. Many people have this strange belief that it's easy for male teachers to seduce their 13-14 yo pupils (without pressuring them in any way) just because they're adults an…
/r/MensRights04/04/17 11:58 AM
-1

Well... Replacing established characters is certainly a big problem, but not the only one. People are getting fed up with the ideology behind it as well. Regressives are poisioning everything they touch, for example 15-25 years ago a "strong female character" (SFC) was nothing more than a clever and innocent inversion of the tough guy trope (like Ripley in Alien and Sarah Connor in T2), but nowadays any and all SFCs are viewed as ideologically driven. When I watch a new movie or series and an SF…
/r/MensRights04/04/17 11:41 AM
1

But teens can be groomed, and can be brainwashed by adults. Are you an average adult male? Just try "grooming" a teenager into wanting to fuck you. It'll never work. This is a myth. What you're thinking about is giving teens drugs, intimidating them, bullying them into sex, which is highly illegal as it is. even then I think the adult has to be responsible We can agree on that.
/r/MensRights04/04/17 10:14 AM
1

The way I see it you have it bass ackwards. If a teen is mature enough to willingly participate in sexual activity we should not assume that any kind of "harm" is done to him/her. This is true even if a breakup can cause some emotional distress. That's just fuckin' life, for christ's sake. We shouldn't punish anyone for unintentionally causing emotional distress to someone else by doing something that isn't illegal, like leaving a relationship. Teenagers learn this stuff by experiencing it, that…
/r/MensRights04/04/17 08:06 AM
1

Yeah, I'm not advocating for letting adults have sex with teenagers freely and without consequences, but I also see how lives are ruined over this topic without good reason. You know, when I see the double standard that men are thrown into jail for decades for having sex with teenagers but women get a slap on the wrist, my reaction is not that we should punish women like men, but the opposite. We should solve this double standard by letting go of the anti-male rape/pedo hysteria instead of expan…
/r/MensRights04/04/17 07:39 AM
2

The shorthand version is "stockholme syndrome". By already "knowing everything" on the subject (that its harmful, bad, wrong), we can dismiss any claims that the presupposed victim wanted, enjoyed it, or was not harmed by it. Any pretense of this is a lie and self-deception on the part of the victim. This is utter bullshit that would only worsen the already nasty hysteria surrounding teenage sexuality. It's quite strange to assume that all sex acts before reaching the age of consent are traumati…
/r/MensRights03/04/17 06:58 PM
2

Feminist logic: respecting a woman (your wife) hurts women in general. If Pence was a leftist he would be celebrated by the same crowd.
/r/MensRights02/04/17 09:31 AM
1

Your argument doesn't make any sense, the way he framed it means Pence is not a good standard for anyone, with or without power. It's pretty obvious to anyone who can interpret the English language that you are angry. LoL I always love it when someone tries to redirect a debate from its actual subject to the people involved. One moment we're having a conversation about politics, the next we're talking about how one of the participants thinks that the other participant looks angry. I can't help b…
/r/MensRights02/04/17 08:41 AM
1

You missed this part: "in positions of power or otherwise", which modifies the meaning of the sentence. Also, trying to undermine me with bullshit shaming tactics will get you nowhere. Try growing a spine instead, it's a lot better in the long run than "winning" some meaningless internet arguments by implying your opponent is angry, overly emotional or whatever. Classic regressive tactic...
/r/MensRights01/04/17 06:50 PM
1

It's not sexist at all, her brain just melted because of its first contact with logic and reason.
/r/MensRights01/04/17 08:03 AM
4

I wouldn't exactly hold him up as the standard for normal men You're a leftist and he's not so he is a shitty person by default, is that it? Or you just don't like him because you get all your information about him from the oh so trustworthy leftist media that isn't biased against conservatives at all?
/r/MensRights01/04/17 07:59 AM
2

It's badly needed. The company names on the list should be links to articles talking about what the company has done to deserve being blacklisted. There should be no limit on how many companies anyone can add, there are people out there with tons of free time on their hands. It should be organized though; the body of the post should contain the list, new additions could be requested in comments, but after these comments are processed they probably should be deleted to keep things tidy.
/r/MensRights28/03/17 08:36 AM
2

So if I am understanding your position correctly ... Yes, his only mistake is that he thinks because TPTB have money they must be rightists, and anything they do must be against the left. Apart from this bullshit, what he wrote is mostly correct. Well, he's a leftist and doesn't want to admit that the modern left is just a tool in the hands of TPTB, he must think that it's some rightist conspiracy against the left. I have sometimes wondered if we are doing the same thing That's a complicated que…
/r/MensRights27/03/17 09:49 AM
2

Both the left and the right seem oblivious to this, mostly because they have bought the oft-repeated lie that feminism is some sort of left wing ideology, a cowpat that is easily swallowed given Karl Marx’s support for the wiminz and the idiot left’s support for feminism. What this guy fails to see is [being a leftist ideology] and [being a tool in the hands of the plutocrats] are not mutually exclusive. Why on earth wouldn't something built on marxism be a piece of leftist ideology, just becaus…
/r/MensRights27/03/17 09:25 AM
1

gender studies programs were given major financial support by the great capitalists -- most notably the Ford and Rockefeller foundations The first mistake is to think that rich megalomaniacs are representatives or proponents of capitalism. These powers hiding in the shadows, manipulating the world through their foundations and whatnot, only use ideologies like capitalism and marxism as tools to reach their goals. They aren't part of any movement or ideology. This says nothing about the roots of …
/r/MensRights27/03/17 09:13 AM
6

Men have always had the same rights women have, usually more rights historically. You obviously know jackshit fuckall about history, you have "learned" what you "know" from feminist PR material. Regardless, women have more rights and protections now, with less responsibilities and restrictions. the title detracts from the movement People (both men and women) don't care about men either way, we're just not as sympathetic as women - tough luck. Our problem is not phrasing, it's the evolutionary co…
/r/MensRights25/03/17 08:06 AM
3

Do we need to start owning our victimhood more fully? Fuck no. Women draw power from their victim status as people (both men and women) are sympathetic towards them, but not towards men, so we won't gain anything by appealing to people's sympathies. What's even more important: Most social justice movements are based around a premise that you're in a class of people who are being vicitimised. this is a classic progressive "divide and conquer" strategy used to undermine our culture, it creates ani…
/r/MensRights22/03/17 10:23 AM
16

The IP address passed on corresponded to an internet account held by Nigel's partner. When Nigel was arrested Fuckin' hell...
/r/MensRights22/03/17 09:49 AM
1

when I was 14 I remember three of my classmates saying that it's not rape if a girl is passed out They perfectly knew that was bullshit, they just wanted an excuse. I suppose back then you thought those guys were assclowns for wanting to have sex with passed out girls, and I bet you thought that because you already knew what they were planning was immoral without anybody talking to you about that scenario specifically. Maybe they heard this on TV That's literally not possible, you can watch vide…
/r/MensRights19/03/17 10:07 AM
1

We should "teach" consent to noone as it's idiotic and degrading. Every kid who's old enough to vaguely understand what sex is already knows that forcing yourself upon others is immoral and a crime. Those who sexually assault or rape don't do that because they weren't thought about consent but because they don't care. We've managed to survive without 'consent classes' for thousands of years, I think we'll be okay without them in the future as well. Especially so since this is a feminist topic an…
/r/MensRights16/03/17 07:09 AM
2

Tell me again how much respect feminists have for men or MRAs... I guess we've "earned" their disrespect by being born with the wrong set of genitals and/or advocating for the basic human rights and fair treatment of men.
/r/MensRights14/03/17 08:01 PM
2

Let's see how she likes "equality" when she loses custody and is forced to pay millions in alimony+CS. I bet it then suddenly becomes a hideous injustice she demands men address asap.
/r/MensRights13/03/17 09:21 AM
1

Some of us have been desperate to find moderate feminists willing to listen And how's that working out for you? I gave up on it after about 10 years of trying, when I realized that feminism isn't an intellectual position to begin with, it cannot be debated rationally. Anyone willing to debate and accept the objective truth for what it is automatically becomes a non-feminist because the truth is indisputably on our side. This means that people can only be feminists if they're 1. unwilling to deba…
/r/MensRights13/03/17 09:02 AM
1

Feminism was always a fraud, it's just their own PR that they were all sunshine in the past. They might say the definition of feminism is equality, but they don't use the dictionary definition of the word 'equality' when they say that - for them it only ever means getting whatever rights/privileges men have or are said to have (without the accompanying burdens, responsibilities and accountability, and without sharing or letting go of their female rights/privileges of course), or grabbing some un…
/r/MensRights13/03/17 08:41 AM
18

WTF is wrong with senators and MPs and whatnot who do idiotic shit like this for the sole purpose of showing they think something else is unjust? Don't they understand that laws are there to govern a country and not for them to make an argument? People like her should be fired immediately for not taking their jobs seriously, they're not only wasting their own time and resources (that should be spent on meaningful work) but that of others' as well.
/r/MensRights13/03/17 08:09 AM
6

WTF is this? If an app, the only relevant response is uninstall... I hope you didn't pay for it.
/r/MensRights09/03/17 10:38 AM
1

If you want complete societal suicide, sure. Wait, don't downvote just yet, I get it that you want actual equality as opposed to the feminist one that is just thinly veiled female supremacy. But there must come a point where people realize that the idea of "total equality" is just as destructive as the feminist one. You can't send women to the trenches because they're less efficient, they distract their male peers and if killed they can't make babies any more. You can't train foreigners to polic…
/r/MensRights03/03/17 09:13 AM
7

I'm talking in general, there are exceptions of course. Men learn to deal with rejection, feeling worthless and disposable a lot faster and harder than women, they learn to hide their emotions (like in your example), and it toughens them up.
/r/MensRights03/03/17 09:03 AM
0

[if] it's a woman groping a man, there is no threat of physical harm, even perceived, whereas a woman being groped by a man feels physically vulnerable in that they could be overpowered This is 100% utter bullshit, as things like this almost always happen in public spaces and after flirting for a while, like in OP's story. No woman could believably claim feeling threatened in the same situation OP was in. It might be unwelcome in certain cases, sure, but that's still just a temporary annoyance a…
/r/MensRights03/03/17 08:56 AM
3

Erhm, fuck this "rape culture" nonsense. OP wasn't raped or rape cultured in any way, shape or form, so please stop criminalizing/sensationalizing innocuous behavior. What we need is to return to saner standards where flirting wasn't a criminal offense, as opposed to mirroring the feminist bullshit about criminalizing male behavior and making sure it's also criminalized when women do it. I don't want to live in a society where people are put in jail for grabbing the ass of someone they've been f…
/r/MensRights03/03/17 08:46 AM
1

She felt so entitled that she could just reach down and grab my ass without any warning. And I mean... I'm cool with that. You're cool with that because in a sane high-trust society that's completely normal flirting behavior from both sexes in the situation you described. It's only "assault" and "harassment" after 50+ years of feminist hysteria and male-bashing. The sad thing is many people, including MRAs, will disagree with this because they've been brainwashed to think that otherwise innocuou…
/r/MensRights03/03/17 08:40 AM
9

It's because 1. men don't have a fagile ego like women, 2. men aren't used to getting their way by whining like women. Men generally take responsibility for their own actions and deal with the consequences, it's women who want to escape both. If a man is fat, well, he ate too much and should diet/work out; when a woman is fat it's men's fault for f_cking up her self-esteem and it's men's duty to adjust their standards to accommodate her.
/r/MensRights03/03/17 08:09 AM
16

I bet Hillary would have been better. /s People voted for him because he was the better option, not because they thought he was an MRA.
/r/MensRights01/03/17 08:34 AM
1

I was expecting some form of an argument to be honest. In the very same drunkenpeasants podcast that is used to incriminate him they talk about the age of consent and Milo says he wouldn't change it, it's fine as it is. He also states emphatically that he's not talking about pedophilia, but sexually mature teenagers having sex of their own will. He also quite obviously talks about his own experiences and clearly says what he experienced was fine by him but it's not for everyone. I wonder what so…
/r/MensRights28/02/17 01:04 PM
2

After saying this I won't keep talking to someone like you. sure as hell you start stalking me, searching for my comments to keep saying how deeply you don't care about them. Fuckin' hell, man, calm down.
/r/MensRights28/02/17 11:07 AM
2

Nice rebuttal of my arguments.
/r/MensRights28/02/17 09:24 AM
1

Could you tell me who's pro-rape in this situation? Milo surely isn't as he never said in his life that raping anyone is okay. Also, what's irrational or illogical about saying that some teenagers might be able to give meaningful consent sooner than others? As for the "defending pedo parties" argument, there are literally millions of people in the world who know about such things and they generally don't come forward because 1. they have no proof, 2. they fear for their safety, 3. they feel some…
/r/MensRights28/02/17 09:15 AM
2

I see nothing wrong in his articles and I don't give a fuck what the guardian says about him. He never said anything to the effect of raping anyone, including boys, is okay. What he said was there are some teenagers who are able to give consent a bit sooner than they reach the arbitrarily designated age of consent that is different from state to state and from country to country. You hate him, cool, have a cookie and fuck off.
/r/MensRights28/02/17 09:00 AM
0

the thing he said about little boys He said nothing about 'little boys', he was talking his own experiences about having consensual sex with an adult. He said the age of consent designated by westerns laws is okay, but there are some teenagers - like himself - just shy of that age who are able to understand sex enough to be able to give meaningful consent. If you think this opinion is undefendable you probably have a hard time accepting that the age of consent is different all throughout the wor…
/r/MensRights28/02/17 08:52 AM
1

In this day and age you can't be this naive. Who would even think about stating that a company is owned by women if not for the exact reason of making a political statement out of it? Yeah, they just wanted to appeal to people who care about the contents of a company owner's underpants, ie. sexists. Why does it have to be part of some sinister agenda? Ask the feminists why they force their ideology into everything from comics to movies to games, and now apparently groceries as well. Who fucking …
/r/MensRights13/02/17 03:29 PM
2

Simply letting them win is a strange strategy unless you want the world to burn and salvage what you can on the ruins.
/r/MensRights13/02/17 02:41 PM
1

See my reply here: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/5tqh9w/saw_this_at_walmart_sorry_about_potato_quality/ddokqpe/
/r/MensRights13/02/17 09:38 AM
3

Problem is, they create animosity where there was none before. They want to enlist female customers into their degenerate 'war of the sexes' where men and women are two opposing factions and women should support each other in their fight against men. They want women to buy their products because feminism, anti-feminists will boycott their products because anti-feminism, and suddenly we can't have a little peace even in grocery stores because they've become arenas of the gender war. Feminism inva…
/r/MensRights13/02/17 09:35 AM
1

It's not really his choice now, sadly. Given that his wife went to the police to fuck him over his chances of seeing his children more than once per season and without supervision are pretty slim. It's also highly probable that she will alienate his kids from him. If I were in his place I'd be ordering my plane ticket to Chile or Japan right now. You know, I would never pay child support (much less alimony) to someone who lied to the cops to get me into really serious trouble in order to rob me …
/r/MensRights09/02/17 08:38 PM
3

Well, his life is fucked up even if he lawyers up and fights the system, he might as well move to another country and start life anew. Preferably somewhere where they won't confiscate his wages for child support.
/r/MensRights09/02/17 09:36 AM
2

Well, oops.
/r/MensRights04/02/17 08:21 PM
1

You do realize Cenk Uygur of The Young Turds fame is a co-sponsor of this movement? Good luck influencing him towards accepting men's rights. I think it's you who doesn't realize that this movement is rotten to its core and influencing it, even if that would be possible, means jackshit fuckall, as you can't influence a cultural marxist movement into doing good things for men. I tried to be reasonable at first, my mistake.
/r/MensRights04/02/17 05:35 PM
1

I'd rather have a "new left" that is against identity politics. There's absolutely no point in reforming the left if they keep what was the core problem with it. What you see now in the US and in the EU, the chaos, aggression and division are all caused by the elite playing divide and conquer with us. Justice Democrats will help noone if they continue promoting hatred in blacks against whites, women against men, LGBTs against heteros, etc. The very first element of a meaningful political reform …
/r/MensRights04/02/17 02:43 PM
2

edit: more crow
/r/MensRights04/02/17 02:12 PM
2

I talked to these guys on youtube and it seems they're into identity politics, which means for all their good intentions they will cause more harm than good. They don't seem to understand that dividing society into groups fighting each other will lead to more hatred, not less.
/r/MensRights04/02/17 08:11 AM
2

Proving that these swedish cunts think politics is a game.
/r/MensRights04/02/17 08:03 AM
1

edit: eating crow
/r/MensRights04/02/17 07:59 AM
4

So you say you don't know what harm leftism has caused in a sub where 90% of the articles are about harm caused by leftism? You know, leftist feminists establishing white house committees and grants and privileges for women but not for men, propagating lies about the wage gap, rape culture and domestic violence, spreading the use of false allegations against men to silence/fire them, and so on. Feminism is a leftist idea in case you didn't notice - it did infect the right to a lesser degree but …
/r/MensRights28/01/17 10:40 AM
2

This is the hatred and ill will OP is talking about. You spread lies about Trump because you hate him for nothing else than being a rightist while you're a leftist. You are irredeemably intolerant to the point of saying anyone not thinking like you is a nazi. Thank God you lost this election.
/r/MensRights28/01/17 10:21 AM
1

The protesters started organizing before he was even inaugurated, so it's blindingly obvious it's just a leftist hissyfit against the right in general. He's very right to cut funding to sexist directives, I applaud him for doing so. In fact this is exactly why he was elected, people wanted this. It is also his prerogative to choose pro-life judges, but just to calm your nerves a bit, he always said he doesn't want to change federal law to make abortion illegal. There are photos on CNN's own fuck…
/r/MensRights22/01/17 08:31 PM
1

Feminism will still turn people off since marching against a democratically elected president is just as stupid as protesting against manspreading. They have no valid beef against Trump and sane people know this. It boggles my mind that you would rather see that power hungry demented mummy with parkinsons and an entitlement complex rule over the US just because Trump's victory makes leftists think they now have something to rally against. It's like letting the bullies win because they would be a…
/r/MensRights22/01/17 04:52 PM
2

As I've said in the other similar topic: The MSM wouldn't give a fraction of a fuck about any MR protests. They cover the women's marches because they're both leftists, and the MRM from their viewpoint is rightist by default. You're with Trump in their eyes, regardless of your actual political leaning. ... Also, read this, it's important.
/r/MensRights22/01/17 08:50 AM
2

The MSM wouldn't give a fraction of a fuck about any MR protests. They cover the women's marches because they're both leftists, and the MRM from their viewpoint is rightist by default. You're with Trump in their eyes, regardless of your actual political leaning.
/r/MensRights22/01/17 08:47 AM
1

How did this logic work out for 8 years under Obama? The SJWs are more insolent than ever, they think they own everything and abuse everyone else with reckless abandon. The education system is churning out these cretins by the thousands, and there's no hope of this ending anytime soon other than republicans standing up against it. in 4 years You mean 8...
/r/MensRights22/01/17 07:48 AM
6

I'm sure Hillary would've been sooooo much better. This way there's at least a chance Trump will fuck feminists over, take away their funding or something. Feminists rally because they are leftists and Trump is coming from the right - anything else are just excuses. If you think a Hillary presidency would have resulted in feminists calming the fuck down you're sorely mistaken.
/r/MensRights21/01/17 09:52 PM
13

It's a badly disguised march for those leftists who can't get over the fact that democracy allows the right to win sometimes. They're using the deliberate misinterpretation of an 11 year old comment as a lame excuse to mask this fact. Things got ridiculous now that leftists are so thoroughly brainwashed some of them actually believe that being on the right is a form of fascism and should be made illegal or something. On the highest levels this is a divide and conquer operation paid for by the li…
/r/MensRights21/01/17 09:46 PM
3

Isn't this a fake account?
/r/MensRights21/01/17 09:39 PM
1

If the kid impregnated the woman I reckon he was biologically mature enough.
/r/MensRights15/01/17 10:01 AM
1

You have to punish criminals according to the severity of the crime, and having consensual sex with a teen does not warrant 10 years in prison. The justice system is not a race to punish lesser and lesser crimes ever more harshly. Just for a thought experiment: if a teenager wants to have sex with you and although you know it's illegal you realize s/he's mature enough mentally to understand what sex is and really wants to do it with you, so it happens, would you say you deserve to lose the next …
/r/MensRights14/01/17 09:33 PM
1

These apologetics for clear-cut statutory rape are getting out of hand. Nobody is excusing statutory rape but people have to realize that it "protects" biologically mature teenagers who are in fact capable of consenting, we just like to look at them as children in need of our protection. Statutory rape is not "real" rape, it does not involve coercion or violence, it's just a belief that although the "victim" is old enough to have sex we think s/he shouldn't. This is reason enough to have differe…
/r/MensRights14/01/17 09:22 PM
1

Having sex with minors is against the law. You don't say. I'm not a judge so I have absolutely no clue whether 10 years is too much You don't have to be a judge to realize that 10 years in prison is absolutely out of proportion for the "damage" the "criminal" has caused. Just imagine right now how you'd feel about spending the next 10 years of your life behind bars. You're of a certain age now, add 10 to that and think about losing everything in between those two numbers. Do you think it's prope…
/r/MensRights14/01/17 07:06 PM
1

If you don't got the time... Don't tell you don't understand the concept of the punishment not fitting the crime. By that logic What I said was there to make you think about how some people in their moral indignitation cause more harm than good. I said she should be punished, yes, but the moral crusade is retarded prudishness at its worst, the prototypical "won't somebody please think of the children?" bullshit non-argument. 10 years prison for having consensual sex with anyone is mindblowingly …
/r/MensRights14/01/17 06:59 PM
1

Well yeah, I can respect this argument. It would be better to go the other way and loosen the unfair grip on men instead of treating women like shit as well, but that seems impossible right now.
/r/MensRights14/01/17 05:17 PM
-1

There is a line, and she crossed it. Yes, and she should be punished by maybe a year in prison, not 10 for fuck's sake. She lacks the self-control to discern between sex partners on a moral/logical basis. That's a danger to me. There's a possibility that the kid's psyche might be affected by the sex itself, but the judicial proceedings inevitably cause way more harm than that. We "help" the kid by traumatizing him 10 times more seriously than he was before. If you think 13 is an acceptable age f…
/r/MensRights14/01/17 05:15 PM
1

Do you think a 30+ year old man who has consensual sex with 13 year old girls is dangerous? It's unetchical no doubt, but it's nowhere near "dangerous" enough to warrant a 10 year jail sentence. Just imagine losing 10 years of your life as punishment - would you say that's appropriate for seducing a teenager? If you can't do that, you're a danger to society IN WHAT FORM??? You might seduce other teenagers as well? Oh gees, on with the firing squad then, we can't have people that dangerous walkin…
/r/MensRights14/01/17 05:10 PM
18

If your brother is unwilling to do anything about the situation, ask/pay a girl to beat the shit out of your brother, also ask/pay her to pour drinks on the retarded girlfriend. Well, I'm sorry to tell you but it seems you have a shitty family. My gut reaction would be to move out with a "fuck you" and never look back, but of course it's not an easy decision to make.
/r/MensRights14/01/17 09:14 AM
4

They want our societies be destroyed and taken over by barbarians who will treat them like they actually want to be treated.
/r/MensRights14/01/17 09:02 AM
14

After reviewing the answers, let’s just say that it’d be wise to never ever fuck with us Well, this is actually good advice: never fuck a feminist.
/r/MensRights14/01/17 09:00 AM
-9

This would still be a travesty with the sexes reversed (don't use the word gender, it has nothing to do with this situation), and this is the point. What we should aim for is lenier sentences overall in cases of adults having consensual sex with teens, as the sentencing guidelines were made based on idiotic feminist fearmongering that men having consensual sex with teen girls is a horrible crime deserving of decades in prison - which is a fucked up notion if I ever saw one. If these retarded law…
/r/MensRights14/01/17 08:55 AM
13

A "win" would be if the laws were revised to assign lenier sentences for both sexes in cases like this. This is the perfect example of a lose-lose situation, where men are unfairly shafted by stupid laws and instead of lobbying for fair laws for men some people are happy when women are also shafted by stupid laws. If you think a 10-year jail sentence is appropriate for having consensual sex with a teen you're out of your mind. Describe to me please the danger this woman presents to society that …
/r/MensRights14/01/17 08:50 AM
6

People who think that stories in which any woman is wronged, hurt, abused or killed must never be told are retards, and I do mean it literally, like having the IQ of a half rotten cabbage retarded. These people can't separate reality from fiction, and telling a story in which something happens from promoting it. They don't understand that not every work of art is a statement from its creator(s) that 100% of what is depicted is acceptable and okay and should be used as an ideal to strive for. Som…
/r/MensRights09/01/17 09:10 PM
2

Exactly. The idea implies that male desire is dehumanizing, and this can only work if men are not really humans. The idea that "the male gaze" strips the humanity off women is misandry of the highest caliber.
/r/MensRights09/01/17 09:48 AM
6

Stop having conversations about men's issues with SJWs, you can't be that stupid. Stop taking SJW bullshit seriously - if you can't separate MR activism as a 'hobby' from your private life, ie. if SJW bullshit disturbs your emotions more than you find it acceptable, you're doing it wrong. None of the described arguments were Red Pill, and there's nothing misogynistic about the Red Pill. The feminists might attack it as it deals in "hatefacts", but it's just the usual leftist war against non-PC t…
/r/MensRights08/01/17 08:55 AM
6

Challenging her on her beliefs would lead to allegations of rape faster than actually raping her would. Yes, really - apparently she likes that stuff.
/r/MensRights08/01/17 08:39 AM
9

It really confused me, because wouldn't that technically be considered misogynist because it implies a submissive position for females The feminist narrative is 100% complete utter bullshit in its entirety, don't fall for any part of it. Most women want dominant men, it's in their instincts, regardless if their egos like it or not. The sooner you realize this the sooner your relationships will improve. You have just experienced that the "red pill" is true, and now you must choose between accepti…
/r/MensRights08/01/17 08:37 AM
4

This is basically the capitalist/libertarian argument against wealth-redistribution, but it applies here perfectly as well. It doesn't matter which group gets robbed of its earnings so another can prosper, both will suffer in the long run.
/r/MensRights07/01/17 10:18 AM
6

They'd be absolutely fine with it if the genders were reversed, in fact it would be "romantic".
/r/MensRights04/01/17 03:25 PM
2

Since I don't think they're just willing to accept the loss of revenue the prices will be adjusted so they gain on men's razors what they have lost on women's. In plain english: men will pay for women's razors being cheaper.
/r/MensRights02/01/17 08:52 AM
4

Another argument is that woman weren't allowed to do those jobs. Ah, the good old utter bullshit argument.
/r/MensRights30/12/16 07:30 PM
1

Positions need to be analyzed on their own merit, independent of the people who hold them. This is fine in theory, but we live in practice - you can only vote for people, not positions. There is of course validity in leftism per se, the problem is that practically no politician on earth represents "good leftism" at the moment, they're all cultural marxists. I totally get it if you're a leftist at heart, but even then you should vote right because the right is a thousand times better then the mon…
/r/MensRights29/12/16 07:04 PM
1

At least the right doesn't view non-PC groups as the enemy. I have never heard anyone from the right saying I should be ashamed because of my genitals or skin color, or that people with my genitals or skin color should be discriminated against. The modern left is built on this very idea. They first and foremost serve themselves, just like the left, sure, but at least they don't want to persecute whites and males just for being "born wrong".
/r/MensRights29/12/16 06:52 PM
4

Problem is, the leaders of the mainstream right are not the KKK, in fact they're very far from it, despite people like Trump or Le Pen being demonized by the left. But the leaders of the left are the worst cultural marxist idiots like Trudeau and Merkel - it's not just "a bunch of morons setting up shop near you". The modern right has a bad name ONLY because the leftist media is hellbent on demonizing us, but the modern left is rotten to its core. If you say I'm a useful idiot for leaders on the…
/r/MensRights29/12/16 01:23 PM
2

MRAs tend to ask "good feminists" why they associate with feminism at all, considering how the brand is damaged beyond repair. The same thing can be said about leftism in general. The only strain of leftism currently available on the political spectrum is deeply infected with cultural marxism. You can either choose to define yourself as a proponent of a long-gone idea of "good leftism" or disassociate yourself from the left altogether. I'd suggest the latter, it makes the constant "we're not all…
/r/MensRights29/12/16 08:07 AM
2

Aleppo is a hoax altogether.
/r/MensRights18/12/16 10:33 AM
1

Because this "fake news" initiative is a progressive weapon against everything non-progressive. It's a way, among other things, to censor us, since we are considered right-wing, despite many MRAs being leftists. Anything non-progressive is considered "right-wing" by the censors, so buckle up folks, the ride is getting bumpier by the hour. As a side note, if any of you US folks have voted for Hillary: fuck you. Stop promoting forces that are out to silence and ruin us. It's time to open your eyes…
/r/MensRights16/12/16 09:16 AM
3

It has no possible resolution. Since it's based on the idea of marxist class warfare, pitching the poor against the rich, which can only be resolved by eliminating the rich, feminism has no solution to the "class warfare" between men and women other than the complete capitulation of men. Feminism will only end when women rule everything and men have literally no power whatsoever, not even over their own lives. Their solution to everything is to "smash patriarchy", and patriarchy is a synonym for…
/r/MensRights07/12/16 11:29 AM
2

Good on you Cenk, now the next step is to realize that when you use accusations of sexism that's the same bullshit.
/r/MensRights15/11/16 08:18 AM
3

Use https://infogalactic.com/ instead of wiki.
/r/MensRights14/11/16 12:57 PM
2

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1spsn4/funny_truefeminist_snowplowing_causing_havok_in/ From 2 years ago...
/r/MensRights11/11/16 12:35 PM
3

Progressivism, as it draws its power from pitting groups against each other (also known as 'identity politics'), is the enemy of men. They treat all their enemies as one giant group of deplorables and are eager to smear us all with false accusations. Trump or r/trp isn't any more sexist than you, you just fell for the idiotic progressive propaganda. Also, since progressives already treat you as an enemy, voting for them is kinda' dumb. Retarded, actually. It's like voting for someone who falsely…
/r/MensRights09/11/16 08:26 AM
1

"Male birth control study nixed after men can't handle side effects women face daily" So, you're saying women are idiots? They destroy their own health out of a false sense of machismo or something? And they're proud of it?!
/r/MensRights03/11/16 07:31 AM
1

Apart from a few naive and misinformed individuals, feminists in general never wanted or attempted to open a dialogue with anyone, not even women. If you think I'm nuts just show me one instance of feminists asking women what they think or want. They want to preach and convert and dictate, and if you have different ideas you will be no-platformed, moderated, silenced, fire-alarmed, petitioned, banned. What a strange way of "opening up a dialogue".
/r/MensRights01/11/16 07:40 AM
1

Not men, robots. You do realize that 90% of the people watching the show don't make this distinction in their subconscious mind; the theme is that men WANT TO rape, they just can't do it because of those pesky laws, so they have built an amusement park with 100% human-looking women to rape. Oh, I don't know why this message would be harmful to young men and women, pushed into their subconscious without a conscious filter, since "it's only a show, and it's only robots". And then you wonder why mo…
/r/MensRights30/10/16 07:59 AM
1

No, the point is that men want to rape, and they use an amusement park to live out their violent fantasies. The guy in black specifically says when dragging the 100% human-looking female robot by her hair that "it's not fun if she doesn't resist". Also, the point is that all the rapists are white men. Other white men are: the effeminate corporate loser suck-up and the owner of the corporation, who, while representing that white men own the world in this supposed patriarchy, is at the same time p…
/r/MensRights30/10/16 07:54 AM
1

Conflating these different movements and claiming some/all of them are hateful is a common feminist tactic, making your question look like an underhanded attack on the MRM. We have a couple of those every week, so if you came here with an honest question this wasn't the way to phrase it. I'm pretty sure others have already explained everything but these groups have nothing to do with each other apart from recognizing some non-PC truths and thus being hated by the PC crowd. None of these groups a…
/r/MensRights30/10/16 07:32 AM
1

Is CIA the same as FBI/DEA? Is LOL the same as GTFO/AFK? I wonder if these abbreviations are made up of different letters for a reason - who knows, they might even represent different things...
/r/MensRights29/10/16 07:22 AM
2

How typical of a Clinton voter to use no arguments or logic, only emotionally charged shaming language. Good to know that you support an equal draft though, the US will certainly need it if Hitlery becomes president and starts WW3.
/r/MensRights29/10/16 06:28 AM
1

Students at the University of California, Berkeley held a violent protest on campus Friday to demand additional segregated “spaces of color” for non-white students A few jail cells should be segregated enough for these violent racist lunatics.
/r/MensRights27/10/16 09:13 AM
8

This shit is in almost all shows nowadays. I heard the new HBO series Westworld was good, I looked at the first episode and it was the usual progressive bullshit: white men are either rapists or losers, and women are either grrrl power supercunts or victims of abuse. The worst part is that the west is so thoroughly brainwashed people don't even see what's going on. For them this has become the default for entertainment.
/r/MensRights23/10/16 08:47 AM
2

You can find the answer in this article.
/r/MensRights17/10/16 07:36 AM
8

People peddling bullshit like this should be deported to their dream countries, Emma Margolin for example should be put on the first plane to Kazakhstan. Also, they don't understand democracy. Whoever you vote for represents you, regardless of their sex. Only retards could ever think that if you vote for someone of the other sex then you're not represented at all. Teenage birth is a choice, and its different numbers in different cultures is a difference that should be celebrated as diversity, is…
/r/MensRights11/10/16 06:54 AM
1

The argument here is that the punishment should be reduced for men too. When we see men being treated unfairly our goal shouldn't be to demand that women be treated unfairly as well...
/r/MensRights30/09/16 08:03 AM
3

I wouldn't call 14 years in prison for such a "crime" justice, and not because it's a woman we're looking at, but because it's lunacy to lock up anyone for 14 years for having consensual sex with a 13 yo. Yeah, the law says kids technically "can't consent" but people should realize this is still not the same thing as having sex with them against their will. The kid wanted the sex to happen, so he wasn't raped or assaulted, he was just "protected" by the law because of his age. So, okay, let's pu…
/r/MensRights30/09/16 07:59 AM
1

I misread the title as "swedish" and was bewildered for a second, until I realized it was "swiss".
/r/MensRights23/09/16 07:51 AM
-1

Basically hormone therapy and surgery to "swap" your sexual organs. My point is not about the fine nuances of the sex change procedure, it's about how you shouldn't be able to compete in female sports as a man simply by claiming you're a woman because you think so... Sports competitions shouldn't care about gender at all - what you think your social construct is is totally irrelevant when deciding who you should compete against. Same with pretty much every similar issue; what you think doesn't m…
/r/MensRights12/09/16 08:31 AM
-1

Erhm, if you have already underwent a sex change then your biological sex is changed... On the other hand, a biological male saying his gender is "female" would actually screw up blood test results and such.
/r/MensRights12/09/16 08:15 AM
1

It's a general argument, saying that if the government wants to know if you're a man or a woman (asking you to tick a box on a form for example) what they should ask for is your biological sex, not your gender. I'm not saying the government should be curious about your sex for no apparent reson :) Yeah, we have tons of problems, but that doesn't mean we can only ever talk about the 1st one on the priority list... This was just a throwaway thought, make of it what you will.
/r/MensRights12/09/16 07:40 AM
1

Nope. The knowledge that women care more about appearances is both basic psychology/sociology and decades of personal experience. Knowing this, and seeing they have put it on a list about how men abuse women, it was not that hard to realize they're projecting. They see abusing your partner but keeping the appearence of a good guy for the outside world as a common strategy among abusers, which it kinda' is, but this is exactly what feminism as a movement is doing when it attacks men but claims th…
/r/MensRights10/09/16 02:48 PM
1

He does have a good point though, this bullet point is classic feminist projection: they present a false image to the world and they believe that men must do this too, and when men do it it's the sign of manipulative intent! Women understand themselves instinctually waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay better than consciously, the only problem is that their subconscious projects their negative traits onto men as a form of psychological self defense.
/r/MensRights10/09/16 05:22 AM
6

the reason their attacks are so vitriolic is ...because they can't argue. Their only weapon is shaming language and it shows.
/r/MensRights10/09/16 04:50 AM
3

Explicitly defining who can use something directly implies that others can't - pretending you're not aware of this won't fool anyone. Try putting up a similar sign saying "a toilet for white people" and then argue the sign doesn't say blacks can't use it, and see where it gets you.
/r/MensRights04/09/16 04:26 PM
3

Jumping the shark doesn't even begin to describe this shit, it's totally out of this world at this point.
/r/MensRights04/09/16 04:12 PM
2

Funny how it's not the mother who's selfish for unilaterally deciding to bring a kid into this world by lying to me about contraception or using a broken condom as an excuse, but me, because I don't want to pay for a kid I never wanted and whom I can't even visit, much less raise how I'd like to raise my own children. It's HER kid and my wallet, a match made in heaven, right?
/r/MensRights04/09/16 03:50 PM
2

That doesn't mean I have to agree with it or like it... From my viewpoint such programs destroy families as they give easy outs to mothers who want to ditch their kids' fathers.
/r/MensRights04/09/16 03:42 PM
1

So just let 'em starve? That's the mother's responsibility, not the taxpayers'. If a single mother can't provide well enough for her kid(s) she should find a guy to share the burden with. Women "marrying the state" is what destroyed family life and the black community in the first place. The aim is to have intact families, not broken ones on govt support. Why don't we just kick everybody off of medicare first. Being sick and having kids are two very different things. If you don't have the resour…
/r/MensRights04/09/16 12:00 PM
1

The solution then is to stop giving taxpayer money to single mothers, not to force men to pay for kids they never wanted or agreed to bring into this world. If you want to force responsibility onto men you must give them a say in the matter as well; responsibility without choice is oppression. If you say men should be able to "veto" a pregnancy and force the woman to have an abortion, but if they decide not to do so then they have to pay child support, that would be a fair and logical stance. (T…
/r/MensRights04/09/16 10:08 AM
8

Are you saying that being against circumcision is itself antisemitic, or that there's a specific antisemitic branch of intactivism? If it's the former, sorry, but I think my rights to not be mutilated are more important than your "rights" to mutilate me for religious reasons. If it's the latter, than okay, it's pointless to attack a religion for MGM. The reasoning behind the mutilation is absolutely irrelevant, the only thing that matters is it should only be done to consenting adults. If you're…
/r/MensRights04/09/16 09:44 AM
7

Because the child is not the result of your action, as the decision is in the hands of the woman 100%. The condom can break, she can lie about birth control, anything might go wrong, and from that point on you're her pawn in her game thanks to no fault of your own. I know it's still comparing the sexes, and saying things aren't fair, but for fuck's sake, we're talking about rights given and responsibilities mandated by the state, some fairness is the absolute mininum we should expect. As long as…
/r/MensRights04/09/16 09:29 AM
7

They are undoubtably hostile to women Some of the followers are, for personal reasons, but the philosophies themselves are not. TRP just says women are people too (aren't feminists saying the exact same thing?), and MGTOW says the current legal climate makes dealing with women dangerous, and that most women seem way too spoiled to worth the effort anyways, which is absolutely true and there's nothing "hostile" about it. Moreover, philosophically speaking MGTOW doesn't even say these things, thes…
/r/MensRights04/09/16 09:09 AM
11

I have problems with two general trends/concepts in the MRM: The idea that we should fight for victim status for men too; this will never work, and even if it would, that would be a bad thing, as our societies really need to end the idiotic "victim culture" ASAP. What actual male victims need is not publicity, "raising awareness", or to be cuddled by the grievance industry, but discreet and effective personal help, that should be managed by discreet organizations that treat men as human beings, …
/r/MensRights04/09/16 08:33 AM
1

Yeah, still nobody cares for the guys themselves, but their mothers are suffering, so we must do something...
/r/MensRights30/08/16 09:57 AM
1

Stop saying "survivors". You can't die from sexual assault therefore there is nothing to "survive" about it. Don't use feminist lingo plz, it gives them credibility.
/r/MensRights23/08/16 10:39 AM
3

Becoming a willing pariah searching for a place where you don't get abused for being male/white/hetero/cis is not a solution. And even if the idea was good there's nowhere to go, the progressive plague is spreading faster than you can travel. The problems need to be addressed where they appear, which means western people need to grow a pair really fast or the entire world will turn to shit soon.
/r/MensRights15/08/16 09:23 AM
2

1.5 “million” missing black men This is in your article. I guess you meant "missing", not "million".
/r/MensRights08/08/16 06:21 AM
1

Isnt the point that neutral laws can have ultimately misandric outcomes? Yes, but tax isn't one of those. not that tax law itself is misandric, but our social expectations are Then talk about the expectations, not the law :)
/r/MensRights18/07/16 06:47 PM
1

The NEMO idea is interesting but they take it too far / apply it incorrectly at places. Their first example is taxes, namely that men pay more. This isn't misandry, for fuck's sake, it's just a natural outcome of men earning more money. If women would earn more they would pay more taxes under the same rules. It's not like the government wanted to fuck men over because hatred, so it decided to tax everyone equally regardless of their genitals.
/r/MensRights18/07/16 08:30 AM
1

I reckon there's more to this than they show in the video - since they already know how the lady will react and who she is it's obvious there was a number of previous confrontations. There's no racist in the world who just starts screaming for no reason when seeing someone walking by, even the most ardent KKK members wouldn't have done that. She's either clinically insane or has been abused or attacked not too long ago, possibly by the very same guys making the video, or some similar-looking "yo…
/r/MensRights14/07/16 06:21 AM
2

I respect CHF immensely for what she's trying to do in good faith, but feminism was always a fraud. The female supremacists and male haters were the majority even in the age of the suffragettes, and their tactics were deliberately misleading and dishonest since the beginning. They wanted all the perks of being a man without any of the responsibilities, while preserving all the benefits granted to women by a genuinely patriarchal society - equality was as much of an empty buzzword then as it is n…
/r/MensRights11/07/16 07:13 AM
1

17 years old is definitely taboo In some states of the US, maybe, and only because of the feminist anti-male, anti-sex hysteria. In most of the world (including other states in the US) the age of consent is lower.
/r/MensRights17/06/16 05:17 AM
2

The media omits facts on purpose in this case, like that he met the woman at a party and they left together to have consensual, albeit drunken, sex. The woman passed out during the act which he probably didn't even notice because he was drunk as well. But of course people are too lazy and/or too stupid to search for the facts when it's a lot more fun to just organize a pitchfork mob.
/r/MensRights05/06/16 04:41 PM
1

Look, I DO NOT want to offend anyone but it seems a lot of people have a serious comprehension problem. Some of you seem to confuse your own interpretations of a situation with what is directly included in a statement. Read my original unedited comment above and realize that it does NOT include anything about how sex with 13 year olds should be okay. That's just you own interpretation of what you think I meant. The two are not the same. What I said was: There is an anti-male rape and pedo hyster…
/r/MensRights05/06/16 08:44 AM
-1

You do realise I never said it was not rape? I said 6 months in prison, a permanent criminal record and being registered on the sex offenders' list is enough punishment for having drunken sex. Do you disagree? Should we execute him or something?
/r/MensRights04/06/16 05:27 PM
1

I would if I had the urge to do so, mostly because where I live the age of consent is universally 14. So, erhm, what was your point supposed to be again? That I'm some kind of a perv for thinking consensual sex is okay? Hm.
/r/MensRights04/06/16 05:20 PM
2

Right here you fucking retard. I don't see anything like your statement there. You seem to believe that saying something that you think is similar to another thing equals saying that too. In reality it doesn't work like that. Just because my words reminded you of something else it doesn't mean I have said that. You also don't seem to understand that one can make general points in reply to a specific notion. Please calm down and try to keep up with the conversation next time before injecting your…
/r/MensRights04/06/16 12:04 PM
3

That's rather puritanical to be honest. A 15 yo should be able to have sex if s/he chooses to do so. The government should have no business in controlling the sexuality of young adults, it's their private business. That's a good idea I can get behind. Still, I very much doubt teenagers would be traumatized by having sex with their teachers by "becoming dumb around adults". Either they actually want it, in which case it's not rape, or they don't, and then it is rape (without the need for any qual…
/r/MensRights04/06/16 11:43 AM
-1

If you can link to me writing that I'll give you a thousand dollars. Otherwise fuck off with your childish behavior. I know it's a hard concept to grasp but I was speaking generally the whole time, I couldn't give a rat's ass about the specific case you're so hung up on.
/r/MensRights04/06/16 11:26 AM
2

I'm talking about teenagers, mostly 14-17 yo's, not children.
/r/MensRights04/06/16 11:23 AM
4

Yeah guys, it's totally okay for a 13 year old to "be in a relationship" with their teacher! Luckily I have never said anything like this, but you can build any number of strawmen for all I care.
/r/MensRights04/06/16 10:54 AM
8

Then, the student, being in a distraught state and not thinking rationally, lies and says "No" You could assume the exact opposite just as easily. The threats can be implicit as well as explicit. But the victim knows if s/he agreed to have sex because s/he wanted to or because s/he feared some form of retribution. You can't just assume that it's the latter every single case. The law does assume this and this is a problem. You mean like abuse the fact that there's a fascination among young people…
/r/MensRights04/06/16 10:19 AM
17

what happens when the teacher does threaten the 13-year-old with something? That is fuckin' rape for christ's sake, what is there to not understand about it? If you threaten anyone there is no consent, and you don't have to call that rape "statutory" because it isn't - it's a garden variety rape against a minor as an aggravating circumstance. Threats = rape. But you can ask the student about it: "Did (s)he threaten you or force you in any way?" It's a simple yes or no question. it's hard to prov…
/r/MensRights04/06/16 09:37 AM
14

Forcing means no consent, ie. rape. I'm talking about cases where teachers didn't "force" anythng on their students. Surely a teenager can find a teacher attractive without anything forced upon him/her... On the other hand you can't manipulate others into finding you attractive even if you're in a position of authority. It just doesn't work regardless of what people believe without thinking things through. the law just blanket-statements all sex with a minor as non-consensual Which is quite sill…
/r/MensRights04/06/16 09:11 AM
3

If this statement was made regarding 14-17 yo's does that mean it also applies to infants?
/r/MensRights04/06/16 09:03 AM
5

As I have said around here somewhere CS laws need a reform even more so than statutory rape laws.
/r/MensRights04/06/16 08:27 AM
34

It's not consensual because the teenager is not able to give consent. They can give consent just fine if their partner is about their age, but not if their partner is older? How's that logical? Stop infantilizing young adults, they don't suddenly become retards when interacting with people older than themselves. Btw there's a fucking difference between a 16/17 and a 13 yold, seriously... And who said there wasn't??? For fuck's sake...
/r/MensRights04/06/16 08:16 AM
3

I don't necessarily think that for a 14-17 yo boy having sex with a teacher is an "obvious mistake", apart from society making it so by intervening and making life a living hell for both parties. This is not the same thing as saying boys can't be raped, but not all cases of sex like this are rapes. If my son would tell me he fucked one of the teachers and it was fun it wouldn't cross my mind to ruin both of their lives by taking it to the police. I reckon we should protect our children by taking…
/r/MensRights04/06/16 08:09 AM
7

It's a grey area for sure and I'm not advocating letting criminals go free. What I'm saying is that the demonization of men has led to this state where we treat men as the scum of the earth for having sex with young women who actually wanted to have sex with them. This is insane. I bet the police intervention, the publicity, and the judicial procedure is a lot more traumatising for those teens than the sex itself. Maybe the US should tone down the witch hunts a bit and move towards what is consi…
/r/MensRights04/06/16 07:56 AM
-4

I know, but still, I can see the judge evaluating these things before reaching a verdict, something people on the internet completely ignore. 6 months in prison for consensual sex between two drunken people during which one of them passes out seems not only more reasonable but maybe even a bit too harsh. It comes with a criminal record and a place on the sex offenders list, if you think that's too lenient you probably should reconsider the weight of his "crime" compared to the effects it will ha…
/r/MensRights04/06/16 07:45 AM
9

My problem is that the age of consent is treated differently according to the age difference, which is illogical. It should be a set number for everyone, like it is most countries, the US being a significant exception. the 16 year old would be highly susceptible to manipulation and coercion I never understood this argument, it seems complete bullshit to me that people only believe in because they've never thought it through. The manipulation part of the statement implies that practically any adu…
/r/MensRights04/06/16 07:32 AM
13

I don't think you need to protect teenagers from making their own decisions. If one is old enough to consent to sex with some people it's stupid to forbid giving consent to others. BUT even if we consider the age difference that much of a problem it still shouldn't be called rape, statutory or otherwise. It just messes up the meaning of "rape".
/r/MensRights04/06/16 06:56 AM
-10

The details are sparse but I bet his story is that the girl left the pub to have sex with him of her own accord and this turned into a "rape" only because the law treats women like children. Also, I find the testimony of the victim laughable: You took away my worth, my privacy, my energy, my time, my safety, my intimacy, my confidence, my own voice That was you drinking yourself to a coma you cretin. Passing out behind a dumpster means you're worthless anyways, regardless of what happens to you …
/r/MensRights04/06/16 06:36 AM
7

Yep, but it will most probably lead to even more stupid restrictions instead of loosening them. We should have a clear goal in mind before raising the pitchforks otherwise we could end up hurting our own cause.
/r/MensRights04/06/16 06:32 AM
22

You can't have consensual sex if you are not of age to consent. The age of consent is an arbitrary number that's a lot lower in some countries other than the US - it's not like you could say that a 16 yo having consensual sex with a 25 yo is rape by any objective measure. If a 16 yo can consent to sex with another 16 yo they should be able to consent to sex with adults as well. Criminalizing men for this is the result of a puritanical anti-male drive in society, and the solution is to stop the n…
/r/MensRights04/06/16 06:30 AM
47

It would be a lot better to go the other way and reduce the scope of "statutory rape" instead of expanding it. Consensual sex between an adult and a teenager should not be called rape regardless of the sexes of those involved. Let's fight against the feminist hysterias instead of joining (and thus legitimizing) them.
/r/MensRights04/06/16 05:56 AM
3

Seeing how they practically admit to discriminating against women up until this point they should be sued. If they didn't, then they are discriminating against men now. It's a lose-lose situation.
/r/MensRights31/05/16 09:07 AM
1

Putting men back on top Men and women are not classes, stop treating them as such. Men were never on top. Some leaders happened to be male, others female. It never meant that any sex was on top of the other.
/r/MensRights30/05/16 09:08 AM
1

Because patriarchy theory says men are oppressors so they can't have problems. Thus "equality" will be reached when women don't have problems either. They hide the stupidity of this behind the apex fallacy and the idea of "male privilege". Another side effect of the same thing is that when they realize something is unfair towards men they wave it away by saying men are oppressors, a little unfairness serves them right.
/r/MensRights28/05/16 07:13 AM
2

This is sickening... Marvel won't be getting any money from me in the foreseeable future.
/r/MensRights27/05/16 10:22 AM
1

How can I speak my opinions in class? Don't. I fear that people will label me a misogynist or a racist They will, and you don't need that. Smart people know when to shut up. Raise your voice with your identity attached to it only if you've been seriously wronged or you have nothing to lose. Otherwise do your activism anonymously.
/r/MensRights17/05/16 07:23 AM
2

I don't think it's wise to spread information helping false accusers to improve their false accusations...
/r/MensRights17/05/16 07:15 AM
2

He called ALL women evil manipulators. And you have never heard of generalizations or exaggerations, you think everything is literal. ...and you don't care at all about what he said about men, only care about his opinion on women. It's okay to bash men but criticizing women for being manipulative (which they generally are) is mysygyny.
/r/MensRights16/05/16 08:13 AM
6

I'm pretty certain this post is fake, ie. somebody came up with a reverse paternity fraud scenario to test 2Xers' answers. The results are what anyone could have expected...
/r/MensRights15/05/16 09:30 AM
2

He says men are too ignorant to realize women are manipulating them. Both parts of this statement are true. You are culturally conditioned to view the mildest negative statement about women as "hatred" (which is one of the main weapons of feminism, one they've been abusing to the hilt for the last 30 years). Meanwhile the media and the education system is full of really harsh negative statements about men, but that's fine. It's time to realize the double standard.
/r/MensRights15/05/16 09:09 AM
4

If you think about it, if a feminist would become a doctor she would act precisely like this. Low T is not a problem for her, she would see that as a solution to the problem of "toxic masculinity". Get another doctor ASAP. edit: On a side note, we are still too cheritable towards women and feminists, we don't want to believe some of them are actually willing to do nasty things they see as "justified". They abuse this all the time but we still don't want to learn. Not all women, of course, not al…
/r/MensRights14/05/16 07:56 AM
1

I bet when an accident happens to one of these taxis or the driver gets robbed they will refuse to accept help from male firemen, paramedics and policemen. They'll wait until female ones arrive.
/r/MensRights11/05/16 09:58 AM
1

That "80% of the homeless" stat always bothered me because if you look at who sleeps on the streets it's more like ~98%. That may be because (although technically they only comprise 20% of the homeless) there are 3-4 times as many women's shelters as men's shelters, plus many of the "family" and domestic violence victim shelters only house women and children. Basically women are only one fifth of the homeless but they receive 5 times more help than men, meaning it's approximately 25 times harder…
/r/MensRights04/05/16 08:10 AM
1

Asking for definitions of words like "instinct" seems like a good way to avoid meaningful discussion, but hey. In this context "instinct" is practically everything people do subconsciously that is a "script" designed by natural selection to guide individuals to make subconscious choices that help the survival of the species. In this case LMR is a subconscious script that helps the women weed out men with suboptimal genes - those who lack a certain level of persistence, self-control, etc. There a…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/16 06:12 AM
1

I don't quite get what you wanted to convey here but let's make this really simple. I make one statement that I think is factual and you can also realize it's factual if you think about it for just 10 seconds: In the entire history of the human race if any work-related task was physically hard, dangerous, or damaging to one's health, it was men who did it, and women only ever had to do such tasks in cases where men weren't available. It's not hard to realize this statement is true, there are no …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/16 02:00 PM
1

People who don't even try to understand an argument but instead look for ways to discredit the other party are idiots. Only you can tell if that includes you or not.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/16 11:32 AM
1

Somehow I have the lingering feeling you didn't waste a single thought on the actual argument, and it didn't even occur to you that maybe you should.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/16 11:18 AM
1

If someone's using a strategy that stops working LMR as a strategy works fine for women. Why do you think it stopped working? It's mainly designed to 1. test how the guy handles tension/rejection in an erotic situation, 2. decrease the perceived loss of social status when they have sex with a new partner, and 3. to make the man work harder for his "prize" and thus appreciate it more. LMR does both of these perfectly fine. Also, it can have any number of further goals we don't yet understand. whe…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/16 07:48 AM
1

Look, erhm, "bro"... It was a simple and logical argument that didn't say anything about men being oppressed, so your answer is nothing more than deflection. My statement is that neither sex was systematically oppressed by the other. You don't seem to have a counterargument other than saying I'm ignorant, which is, well, not a counterargument. I said that society views women as more oppressed in the recent past Yeah, and I said society is full of idiots who accept any lie as long as it favors wo…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/16 06:13 AM
1

Good-natured feminists never seem to get that their insider's bias distorts their own view of their own movement. Outsiders look at feminism and see how it has already corrupted the justice system, media, education, academics, etc, and how it is in the process of actively corrupting these even more. (By this I mean making it as openly and drastically anti-male as possible.) It was not you who lobbied for all the anti-male measures, but it was people calling themselves feminists, so you saying yo…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/16 03:30 PM
1

your opinion is at odd's with the rest of the Western world People in the west are generally idiots and morons who believe any old bullshit that shines a positive light on women and a bad one at men. In the entire history of the human race if anything was physically hard, dangerous, or damaging to one's health, it was men who did it, and women only ever had to do such tasks in cases where men weren't available. (This is still true to this day in practically every part of the world, even in the m…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/16 01:09 PM
1

But that doesn't mean no adjustment should occur. Instincts don't care about ideological adjustments. No matter how much you tell people not to use mating strategies that millions of years of natural selection have built into them, it won't happen. That would first of all require solid knowledge and conscious control of one's own sexual desires and behaviors, something even you don't have. If the dynamics changed so that women who wanted sex but wouldn't communicate that stopped getting what the…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/16 11:16 AM
1

6oodfella made a video about this less than 2 weeks ago.
/r/MensRights20/04/16 10:45 AM
5

The first half of your answer is okay but they wouldn't even understand the second half. I would continue with something like "I consider my sexuality to be a private and intimate matter the school has no business delving in." And really, it doesn't. When did it became accepted that a place of education tries to intrude into such private matters? My kids go to school to learn about science or a trade, not to let teachers oversee or control their sexuality.
/r/MensRights14/04/16 09:14 AM
1

Vote with your wallet, that's a lot simpler than arguing with idiots. If you really want to say something say you'll take your money elsewhere until they change their practices - money is the language business owners understand. Make sure to say it to the owner though, the staff might just ignore you.
/r/MensRights14/04/16 08:59 AM
4

I bet she will go free as well.
/r/MensRights14/04/16 08:26 AM
10

neighborhood watch Erhm... You mean their main job is to look for suspicious things in the neighborhood and report them to the actual police?
/r/MensRights14/04/16 08:14 AM
1

Of course women have problems, but that doesn't mean men oppress women. (Men have problems too, does that mean women oppress men?) Feminists portray every problem women face as coming from male oppression but it's just their fake narrative. Take abortion in the US for example. Feminists say things like "men want to control women's sexuality" and so on. Which is idiotic considering lots of men are pro-choice and lots of women are pro-life. It's not a men vs. women issue, feminists only say it is …
/r/MensRights13/04/16 06:16 AM
2

Oh, I didn't even notice. Hm.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/16 05:46 AM
1

Oh for crying out loud, taking my every word literally literally makes you miss the point by a mile. Did the Guardian article discuss how the mass execution of men means islam is not pro-men & anti-women? Nope. They did the opposite - they twisted the story into saying the real victims are women. The first thing you see in the article is a picture of a woman with the tagline "Shahindokht Molaverdi, vice-president for women and family affairs, said: ‘Society is responsible for the families of tho…
/r/MensRights12/04/16 10:19 AM
1

You're a well-intentioned feminist who actually wants to make the world a better place. I respect that. Too bad the representatives of your movement in the media, in the education system, in politics, are not like you. Their words and actions make women angrier towards men which only leads to more animosity and misery, a prolonged war between the sexes that can never be won by either side, only lost by both. If you were running for president or write for the Guardian I'd say feminism is a good t…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/16 09:28 AM
2

If I wanted to list every single radical feminist famous on the internet I'd be over the character limit twice.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/16 08:56 AM
1

men being legally allowed to beat their wife That there was no law against something specific it doesn't mean 1. it wasn't covered by broader laws; 2. it was socially accepted. Wife beaters were punished and/or publicly shamed even though there was no law specifically saying a husband shouldn't beat his wife. The same is true for marital rape. The middle east is a whole new can of worms westerners know jack shit about. The mainstream media only ever talks about the gender situation in the middle…
/r/MensRights12/04/16 08:46 AM
1

Desperate times called for desperate measures. When people were starving to death there was no other option than everybody working like dogs. Still, the general idea was always that men do everything they can, the hardest and most dangerous stuff, leaving only the rest to women and children. If men had enough time and capacity for everything women and children didn't work at all - that was the american dream for one example. You didn't say anything that would disprove this, which is only natural…
/r/MensRights11/04/16 06:46 PM
1

Erhm, either you accidentaly switched 'former' and 'latter' or I misunderstood something :) My problem with feminism is that everything that differentiates it from egalitarianism makes it worse than egalitarianism. If you compare the two, feminism is egalitarianism with the added notion that women were/are oppressed by men. Regardless of dictionary definitions or whatnot, if you remove this notion from feminism you're left with egalitarianism. But if you look out the window or analyze history th…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/16 12:42 PM
2

Moderate feminists (ie. true scotsmen :) come to the topic of gender equality from a humanitarian viewpoint, addressing all inequalities as they come, seeking redress for both men and women as necessary. They don't spread lies and falsehoods (like the wage gap, rape culture, patriarchy theory, etc.) to paint men in a bad light, they do not participate in a war against men. Radical feminists care only about women, view gender relations as a war where women have to beat men, and don't have a probl…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/16 08:05 AM
2

Miners are perfect to make this general point. All throughout history it was always men who did the hardest, unhealthiest and most dangerous jobs including but not limited to mining. Mining was (and still is) one of those tasks that were physically hard, highly damaging to your health and very dangerous - this is why it was evident beyond obviousness that men had to do it. Not because they wanted it so badly but because women were precious and men were expendable. You seem to think both men and …
/r/MensRights11/04/16 07:06 AM
3

Typical deflection that serves no purpose other than to save face. You would gain so much more from acknowledging your mistakes - this way you're bound to commit them again and again.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/16 05:51 PM
7

Feminism is a massive umbrella term, under which everyone fights with one another. I hear this all the time and yet I see absolutely no resistance against the radical mainstream. Yes, I meant radical mainstream, since all the feminist talking heads in the mainstream media are radicals like Hillary, Ensler, Valenti, Sarkeesian, Marcotte, and so on. They have all the power in the movement and those supposed moderates assist to this without so much as raising questions. Well, moderate feminists mig…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/16 10:25 AM
4

Let me guess - you've never even talked to an MRA but you already have preconceptions about them, damning judgment coming from people who drink from "male tears" mugs and support hashtags like killallmen. And we're the "haters". Right.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/16 10:10 AM
14

You seem to miss the general point, which is all throughout history it was always men who did the hardest, unhealthiest and most dangerous jobs - and women did the rest, the supplementary tasks men couldn't do for the lack of time or capacity. Women have practically never worked in hard or dangerous jobs if men were also available. This picture represents this fact perfectly. Arguing that women also did this or that thus women worked just as hard as men is worse than meaningless, it's disingenuo…
/r/MensRights10/04/16 09:50 AM
5

Blaming men for women's choices, chapter 270.
/r/MensRights07/04/16 08:00 AM
11

Black men are overwhelmingly the biggest victims of police violence No they aren't. US police shoots more white people than blacks. At the very worst you might say black men are victims of police violence proportional to the rates they are committing crimes.
/r/MensRights07/04/16 07:59 AM
1

If they don't like the conditions they shouldn't participate, nobody forces them to accept the WNT's offer, or FIFA's, for that matter. Also, how much of a princess you must be to whine after receiveing hundreds of thousands of dollars in bonuses?
/r/MensRights01/04/16 07:14 AM
2

a Carpenter and a Blacksmith did participate in oppressing women by creating social structures Let me stop you right here :) Feminists might say this, sure, but realistically speaking what "social structures" could a blacksmith create? This is fancy newspeak that only builds sophisms, empty arguments that sound good but mean nothing. Meaningless twaddling about ill-defined "social structures" is just a tool to divert your attention from facts, like it was men who did the hard work while women di…
/r/MensRights28/03/16 09:06 AM
6

spokes-person You mean spokesman? Drop the retarded feminist newspeak, please. Yeah, the daily beast is trash, just like any other publication on the regressive left. They lie about their political opponents with reckless abandon. What MRAs should realize here is that regressives lie about Roosh just the same as they're lying about us. We should probably stop the infighting in the manosphere and join forces to beat our real enemies - we can restart the infighting after we've won the war.
/r/MensRights27/03/16 08:03 AM
1

After we fucked him over he wrote a blog post saying he'll call himself an MRA from then on just to reciprocate our kindness.
/r/MensRights27/03/16 07:57 AM
3

Women's oppression? All throughout history, if anything was dangerous, harmful, or just plain hard, it was always men who did it. I doubt they had too much time left to "oppress" those who they worked for. It's not that hard to make a group look like they were/are oppressed, you just have to limit the discussion to their problems and hardships, plus if anything specific can be interpreted in more than one ways you have to stick to the worst interpretation for that group. Like, if it's customary …
/r/MensRights27/03/16 07:46 AM
4

Absolutely disgusting. When enemy combatants are attacking her will those guys protect her again? This is how you undermine the morale and the efficiency of a fighting unit.
/r/MensRights19/03/16 06:08 PM
1

It still furthers the rape hysteria that is used to give more power to the state over the individual. A step in the right direction would be if assclowns like him would acknowledge that sexual assault is actually really rare and shouldn't receive this much attention at all.
/r/MensRights29/02/16 02:33 PM
1

+1. Joking about rape is as much of a sign of a rape culture existing as joking about killing midgets is a sign of a "midget murder culture".
/r/MensRights23/02/16 09:03 AM
2

Culture is not what some individuals think or do. Culture is what the entire community stands for. There is no "rape culture", because our communities treat rape as the most heinous crime ever, even worse than murder. Our culture does not condone, support, excuse or encourage rape in any way, shape or form. Well, except feminists, that is, like Eve Ensler who wrote in the Vagina Monologues that a woman raping a 13 yo girl after getting her drunk was a "good rape". You will never hear non-feminis…
/r/MensRights23/02/16 08:53 AM
2

It was pretty much always like this. It's a biological fact that men want sex more than women, which in turn skews the market in their favor. If you want something real bad the seller can jack up the price, it's economics 101. Men always fought for the attention of women, and women could always just lay back and choose from what was on offer - these are just facts of life. Still, we now have the added problem of social media giving women so much extra attention they feel like the whole world wan…
/r/MensRights15/02/16 03:17 PM
3

Why do feminists take it for granted that women are more "oppressed" than men? Because their entire movement depends on this notion. If they would question it, or even allow questioning it, the whole ideology would crumble. This leads to their one-sided blindness where they observe in meticulous detail the hardships of women but ignore the hardships of men on a mindbending level. This way it's laughably easy to "prove" that women have it worse. They do this consistently with the past, the presen…
/r/MensRights14/02/16 08:59 AM
10

It was always men who did the most dangerous and back-breaking work while at the same time protecting women from whatever outside dangers were present. The feminist narrative is 100% bullshit built on the assumption that men hated those who they loved, and that men were stupid enough to fight against women who they had no conflict of interest with. (The competition for a blacksmith was not his wife but another blacksmith, ie. another man. It would have been pointless beyond insanity for men to t…
/r/MensRights13/02/16 01:35 PM
1

I watched his press conference yesterday where he explicitly said he never raped anyone. He had sex with drunken women, boo fuckin' hoo. Also, by now a "victim" of his would surely come forward if there were any. Still, if he ever raped anyone the police should investigate and the courts should decide if he's guilty. This pitchfork mob, and governments discussing to ban him from their respective countries is ludicrous. His rights are being violated left and right and nobody cares because rape hy…
/r/MensRights10/02/16 04:31 PM
5

Thanks to combative feminism many women out there now confuse intelligence with arrogance. They feel a constant urge to prove their amazing intellect by interrupting anything and anyone, getting offended when a man tries to tell them anything (you know, mansplaining), and by being hair-triggered argumentative freaks at all times. And they don't understand why men don't like to be around them - proving their IQ is not that high afterall. What men usually prize in women is agreeableness. If that i…
/r/MensRights10/02/16 12:09 PM
2

Although the most recent high-profile cases of sexual harassment in science have arisen in astronomy and biology, many researchers say paleoanthropology also has been rife with sexual misconduct for decades. This is a fuckin' nightmare that has to be stopped. The hysteria is ruining our civilization.
/r/MensRights10/02/16 11:55 AM
-7

He's totally fucking right, we threw him under the bus to avoid bad publicity that we couldn't avoid in the end anyways because the feminist-friendly media doesn't give a fuck if we distance ourselves from him. I'm disgusted by all the cretins who can't see the bigger picture here, that what is happening to him is exactly the same thing that happened to Tim Hunt, Matt Taylor and countless others. He didn't wore the wrong shirt or told the wrong joke, he wrote the wrong blog post about STOPPING R…
/r/MensRights10/02/16 10:25 AM
2

Matt Taylor wasn't an MRA either, yet we cared about what happened to him. Same with Tim Hunt. We're not a union protecting its own members, we don't just care about MRAs, we care about ALL MEN'S rights. Except when that man is a womanizer, apparently, because that nullifies his human rights and gives the feminists free license to destroy his life, and we're okay with that.
/r/MensRights05/02/16 06:51 AM
4

I'm an MRA because I care about men Except when that man is a womanizer, then you don't give a hoot, right? What feminists are doing to Roosh is fine because... erhm... he wrote an article they found offensive since they can't differentiate between thought experiments and actual proposals for laws. Is that a good enough reason to look the other way and just let feminists violate his human rights?
/r/MensRights04/02/16 06:20 PM
12

Even if this were true, which it is not, but still, does some guys trolling on ROK justify us protesting Roosh's meetings? SRS is full of out of context quotes coming from r/mensrights, should we protest against ourselves now, or what? Don't believe any bullshit feminists are saying about men they don't like, and also don't confuse troll comments with someone's message. Furthermore, what if any of them actually thinks sluts should be shamed? It would be their fucking opinion they are entitled to…
/r/MensRights04/02/16 12:45 PM
12

There are petitions and media campaigns to ban him from entering countries and whatnot, plus aspiring vigilante groups threatening him with violence. He is constantly harassed on- and offline. And what about the rights to free association and assembly of those who want to hear him talk? Denying what's going on is only burying our heads in the sand. Or do you honestly think that what happens to him is fine and dandy? It's not much different from what happened to Tim Hunt or Matthew Taylor. I tota…
/r/MensRights04/02/16 12:30 PM
7

Exactly. I can't really understand what we're saying here... We only care about the rights of those men who are not womanizers? Feminists should be free to target PUAs or TRPers? Suddenly it's okay to violate a man's basic human rights if he says he's not an MRA? Is it more important to protect our assess from feminist media than to follow our principles? What gives?
/r/MensRights04/02/16 12:03 PM
11

What message are you talking about? Do you know anything about Roosh beyond what feminists say about him, ie. that one article about rape that is clearly misinterpreted intentionally by his enemies? I can't fathom how some MRAs can process the cognitive dissonance between knowing that the media is lying about the manosphere all the time, and getting their information about other segments of the manosphere exclusively from that media. There is literally nothing in Roosh's message that a sane man …
/r/MensRights04/02/16 11:57 AM
15

Could MRAs gather and protest the ROK meet-ups? For what? On what basis? They have done nothing wrong, despite Roosh's infamous rape article that was clearly social commentary / satire that feminists misinterpret intentionally to justify their hatred of him. And make no mistake, they hate him because he's an anti-feminist, and because he's a successful womanizer. These are not valid reasons for us to protest against them. But hey, sure, we can always use some more infighting in the manosphere, t…
/r/MensRights04/02/16 11:50 AM
12

It's something new to me that you have to be an MRA for the MRM to care about your rights as a man. Roosh's ordeal is pretty much our business despite him saying he's not an MRA because it concerns MEN'S RIGHTS. I mean men's basic human rights to assembly, association, travel, etc. Roosh's rights are being trampled on and we're ignoring it because we fear bad publicity. Like feminists in the media would care that we dissociated ourselves from Roosh. They will continue to treat us, them (PUAs and…
/r/MensRights04/02/16 11:38 AM
1

Yeah, the problem is not that Roosh's get-together won't be successful, it's that feminists have enough power to shut down anyone they don't like. It's not just Toronto, it's pretty much everywhere. And it's the same shit that prevents Men's groups being formed at universities, etc. MRAs shouldn't shrug it off just because it's now happening to someone who isn't an MRA.
/r/MensRights02/02/16 01:44 PM
1

This isn't about an imaginary moral high ground. When a group of idiots does stupid things the solution is not to mimic them, but to undo their stupidity. When the KKK lynched blacks the solution was not to lynch whites as well, you know...
/r/MensRights31/01/16 07:35 AM
1

Trying to change what people react to on an emotional level in entertainment would be futile and pointless. Action movies always play on men's instincts to protect women by fighting other men and women's instincts of finding a man who will protect them. This should not be changed, this isn't a plot against men.
/r/MensRights17/01/16 11:56 AM
1

Well, instincts are only predispositions, individual tastes may vary. Talking about these things is tricky because looking at broad tendencies and statistics they inevitably show, but almost everyone feels like an exception, an outlier. As for your situation, it's important for a woman to be able to look up to her partner, and that's quite a bit harder if she has higher social status than him. It can be worked around if the guy knows what's he's doing but - statistically speaking - most of these…
/r/MensRights13/01/16 12:46 PM
1

You don't seem to understand that for women to be able to afford hypergamy men in general have to be richer than women to begin with. Since men control more resources than women it is mathematically impossible for most women to marry any other way but up. In order for men to be able to afford hypergamy first you'd have to make sure that women in general are richer than men. You can already see the changes in society as some women are getting richer. Madonna married Guy Ritchie for example, so sh…
/r/MensRights13/01/16 10:34 AM
1

Women are hypergamous and men are polygamous by nature, which are different mating strategies created by natural selection. These are the optimal strategies for the collective survival of our species, and as such are encoded in our instincts. It's not something you can practice, or decide not to - it's hidden from your conscious mind. It determines who you find sexually attractive. Boiled down to basic concepts they mean that men generally want all of the women who show signs of fertility, while…
/r/MensRights13/01/16 10:00 AM
-6

Hypergamy is not a privilege, it's an instinct.
/r/MensRights12/01/16 12:45 PM
2

Yeah, it's kinda strange how feminists couldn't name a single law that favors men over women for the last, what, 30 years? (As opposed to laws favoring women over men, which are right there in the lawbooks as of today.) Feminism now fights against 'manspreading', attractive women in video games, and colorful shirts with drawings on them. If you think I'm joking or exaggerating you can make me look stupid real quick by citing just one law that favors men over women...
/r/MensRights05/01/16 01:22 PM
2

Enough people talked about lawyering up already, so... In the unlikely case that the rumor spreads and things are starting to get out of hand leave town immediately. Many people believe these accusations automatically and in small communities that can be devastating. Many men were beaten to death by vigilantes in cases like this.
/r/MensRights05/01/16 01:12 PM
-2

Everyone should have equal rights and responsibilities. This is a modernist idea coming from a civilization that has the disposable resources to pursue such ideological goals at the cost of reduced economical, industrial and social effectiveness. To project this onto the past is meaningless and counterproductive. Gender roles were there to ensure the survival of the species and they worked like a charm. Destroying them for ideological reasons is a risky proposition at best - it's a giant social …
/r/MensRights03/01/16 01:55 PM
2

The entire "power" narrative is based on the misandric feminist myth that men enjoy controlling women more than they enjoy sex, which is pure bullshit. Feminists redefine concepts like "power" in order to bash men - rapists want sex, not control or power. If they wanted control or power that wouldn't even need to involve sex, would it? They could just order the victim to make them a sandwhich. In fact that would be way more control and domination than drugging someone and fucking their unconscio…
/r/MensRights03/01/16 12:54 PM
1

There are other options, you're just stuck in the false dilemma fallacy. The fact that rapists do it for the sex doesn't mean that it's normal or that all men are rapists. It means that rapists are different from normal men in that they are willing to use violence to get sex, ie. they are psychopaths.
/r/MensRights03/01/16 12:37 PM
2

When limiting "Rape" to perps jumping out of the bushes with a tazor style attacks, there is a strong case that it's about power. These people feel they don't have any power in the sexual arena When you say "they don't have any power in the sexual arena" what you really mean is they didn't fuck for years. You could call that a lack of power, or, you could call that what it is: pent up sexual frustration which drives them to violence. The "power" narrative is based on the feminist myth that men w…
/r/MensRights03/01/16 12:32 PM
3

Needs more upvotes and more publicity.
/r/MensRights01/01/16 10:32 AM
0

Men and women are not only biologically different. Unifying dress codes will only make us look more androgynous. We should fuckin' celebrate our differences instead of trying to erase them.
/r/MensRights22/12/15 09:30 AM
-6

If this is true it's retarded. Men and women are not the same for fuck's sake, and different dress codes are not 'discrimination'.
/r/MensRights22/12/15 08:14 AM
4

If you don't want to get married, you should at least try out hookers. For guys having problems attracting quality women this could mean a life altering experience and be the money best spent in their entire lives. $300 an hour to $1000 an hour – this kind of depends on where you are. But it’s the range for girls who can’t claim to be famous somehow. At the lower end they’re mostly 7’s or so. At the higher end of this they’ll be models with no real credits or work, and mostly 8’s and 9’s. You ca…
/r/TheRedPill17/12/15 10:22 AM
30

You can see how much feminists care about men's issues in this video. And it's not some faceless troll on the net, it's a member of the British Parliament who directly influences policies.
/r/MensRights17/12/15 09:59 AM
2

Karen Straughan has mentioned this in her videos, the average westerner knows plenty well how muslim women suffer but they know jack shit about the situation of muslim men. This is exactly how feminists deal with our past in the west: they keep talking ad nauseam about how women had it bad but they never say anything about how men had it. This creates the illusion that men had/have it good, which is bullshit both about our past and about other cultures in the present. You guys don't seem to unde…
/r/MensRights16/12/15 08:10 AM
1

...and men can't (or are forced to) do or have other things. You have just repeated the one-sided narrative about islam that centers entirely on women.
/r/MensRights15/12/15 02:13 PM
3

Fuck this retarded shit about mysygyny everywhere. Men of all cultures have attacked each other claiming the others are mysygynysts. This is bullshit. The general standing and status of women in most islamic cultures are equal to or better than men's. (You could of course fall for the apex fallacy and compare the average woman to the sheikhs and oil barons but that would be silly.) The western media is loud about muslim women being stoned to death for bullshit reasons but they somehow fail to me…
/r/MensRights15/12/15 10:28 AM
30

Feminists are totally clueless about gender dynamics that influence people's perception of characters and stories. A male protagonist can't fight against a female because the audience will almost invariably see him as brutish, cowardly and so on. There's nothing to gain for a man by beating a woman ("of course he beat her, he's stronger") but a lot to lose if he fails ("how pathetic to be beaten by a girl"). The most frequent female psychosexual fantasy is powerful males fighting for them (it's …
/r/MensRights15/12/15 10:05 AM
1

The very idea of 'gender violence' is total bullshit, no man on earth beats women just because they're women. There is a reason for violence and gender isn't it.
/r/MensRights10/12/15 09:54 AM
1

Any ideas how to write this paper without coming off as a woman hater? This pretty much answers your original question. If you dare to just examine the feminist narrative you're immediately shouted down as a woman-hater. You don't even need to challenge it directly, asking a couple of questions is enough. Feminism is a scam religion like scientology, it has its dogmas that must not be questioned. Too bad so many people fall for it. They only want equality, right? Yeah, and their definition of eq…
/r/MensRights03/12/15 07:19 AM
0

There's not much you can do at this point, going to the courts to modify the decision will probably get you nowhere, you'd just lose more money in the process. So you either accept things as they are, which means soaking up the injury, the added insult, and even taking the blame for all of it - or you do something unexpected. Sometimes I think about what I would do in such a situation and the most probable path I would take is to leave the country without a trace and start a new life somewhere e…
/r/MensRights30/11/15 09:26 AM
6

the epidemic of domestic and family violence that has seen 78 women killed this year, mostly by their partners or family members, is a gendered issue which - while complex - stems largely from men's sense of entitlement and 'ownership' of their partners It boggles my mind how anyone can be so retarded as to write something like this in a newspaper in the 21st century. This open hatred towards men is unbelievable. Out of all forms of relationships the most violent is a lesbian one, statistically …
/r/MensRights26/11/15 08:15 AM
2

Some forms of FGM are less invasive than standard MGM.
/r/MensRights26/11/15 08:03 AM
2

She's a remarkable cunt.
/r/MensRights24/11/15 10:21 AM
9

This is how feminists address male problems. And it's not coming from an internet troll or something, it's a feminist member of the british parliament who has actual power over what issues are taken seriously.
/r/MensRights24/11/15 10:09 AM
1

It seems there won't be any place to go except Russia. English speaking countries are all down the shitter, Europe is pretty much doomed by the EU spreading the same feminist bullshit, and even South America is thoroughly infected now.
/r/MensRights23/11/15 12:59 PM
3

There's a scene in Starship Troopers where a teacher says to his class that practically nothing was ever solved peacefully, and contrary to popular belief it is violence that solves things. I don't know why this came to my mind. He should sue the university immediately and demand that everybody who shouts at him be expelled, and sue them as well for good measure.
/r/MensRights23/11/15 12:48 PM
1

Men and masculinity are shamed and repressed and are under so much stress nowadays it's a miracle that only so few man turn into crazed lunatics. Of course man-haters' answer is to shame and repress masculinity even more. As usual, the progressive answer to conflict is adding fuel to the fire instead of figuring out how to calm everyone down. It worked so well with race relations... That men commit more violence is a fact, albeit I'm sure the 97-99% "statistic" is bullshit. This "extra" male vio…
/r/MensRights17/11/15 08:58 AM
1

Using this case as a springboard to jump into a general discussion about domestic violence, the state should get the fuck out of any and all family disputes that doesn't result in injuries requiring medical treatment. Nobody needs the police or the state involved in what should be treated as a private matter in a sane society. If your partner lashes out at you in anger and you don't like that FUCKIN' LEAVE. That is the proper solution if you find out you've chosen the wrong partner. There should…
/r/MensRights12/11/15 12:38 PM
1

Jaye initially planned to profile the men’s rights movement from a feminist point of view, but found her beliefs changing while filming the documentary. Let's hope this means what it seems to mean. It says everything that feminists attack one of their own for wanting to start a conversation with us... The most important symptom of being a bigot is refusing to have a conversation.
/r/MensRights12/11/15 12:07 PM
3

It's only fitting to show the face of Jess Phillips on a program called "Britain's biggest sexists", she really is among the biggest ones.
/r/MensRights04/11/15 01:23 PM
3

So typical to see feminists attacking everyone, making any type of meaningful conversation impossible. Being impartial is no defense against feminists like Futrelle who's so very pro-woman that he launched a hate campaign against one. The cognitive dissonance probably ate his brains decades ago, that's why he's such a retarded zombie nowadays.
/r/MensRights04/11/15 01:10 PM
12

For this once I have to agree with them: it would have been a lot better to join the effort with ideas for helping homeless men than to simply say men are bigger victims. On a side note, the numbers cited in the comment are bullshit. Men take up much more than 68% of those actually homeless, it's closer to 95%. The official data on homelessness often includes women who are technically homeless but have other arrangements like living with relatives. Go out tonight and see for yourself, for every …
/r/MensRights03/11/15 12:48 PM
1

You do need to read these because that will help you realize how much of a bullshit feminism is. After reading the SCUM manifesto nobody can fool you any more with "feminists only want equality".
/r/MensRights03/11/15 12:37 PM
2

The wage gap feminists talk about is between the average wages of all male employees in any given country vs. the average wages of all female employees. This results in the infamous "77 cents" soundbite. But it also means it's not the same job. Women are not paid less for doing the same job, because that would result in all companies employing only women for ever. No company would be stupid enough to pay a "dick bonus" to men just because there's something dangling between their legs. The differ…
/r/MensRights03/11/15 12:26 PM
8

I watched the episode a couple of days ago and had a mixed impression. The main character acts feminine enough to raise some feminist eyebrows, which is cool, but there are still too many "you think I can't do this because I'm a woman?" type comments for my taste. The show is a step in the right direction but it's still a bit too... what's the proper word... militant about gender stereotypes and such. Also it plays too much on the "fragile looking girl kicks the butt of men twice her size" trope…
/r/MensRights28/10/15 01:31 PM
3

Feminists only want a gender equality, you know, one where women are treated as more important and valuable than men.
/r/MensRights25/10/15 09:45 AM
2

How much of a cretin one must be to think that suicide should be prevented by taking away some of the tools used to do it rather than solving the problems leading to it. No, we don't need to care about the well-being of men, we just have to take their guns so they can't off themselves so easily (thus continue to exist in misery worse than being dead). What a disgusting piece of trash this guy is.
/r/MensRights24/10/15 07:55 AM
11

There's a deeper significance to his punchline. It is in women's nature to overstate their problems to garner sympathy, and many of them simply make up shit if their real problems are obviously insignificant. (Evolutionally speaking manipulating and nagging men is their method of survival, since they don't have the physical strength of men.) Men should wake up to the fact that when women talk about their problems they will almost always overstate them or outright lie about them - and this is esp…
/r/MensRights18/10/15 09:33 AM
1

I partially agree on the market forces part - if we allow the indoctrination of women with misandric bullshit to continue no amount of sexbots will make them realize it's their own combativeness and prejudices against men that makes relationships with them undesirable. Some women will realize they have to return to a healthier paradigm wrt relationships, where they actually offer something to the man they want to be with, but many more will just up the ante and bash men even more, as well as dem…
/r/MensRights17/10/15 07:57 AM
2

The question here is not a legal one, it's how the fuck we got here in the first place; men are so thoroughly demonized it almost seems normal and natural that we're treated like scum. The arrogance, the callousness, the tyrannical nature of it all is just mind-boggling. No educational facility has any business in its students' private sexual lives. Even if they rape someone, that's not an educational issue but a criminal one to be handled by the police and the courts. What an absurd idea it is …
/r/MensRights16/10/15 10:14 AM
1

I wonder what the women's officer would say if the men's officer would invite her to mandatory lessons about sexist bullshit involving her own intimate sexual life.
/r/MensRights16/10/15 09:39 AM
2

The way you judge him is the very same way he judged her - you both think there are actions that justify murdering someone. The difference between you and him is not that your moral values are higher but that you want the state to bash his head in, you wouldn't want your own hands dirty.
/r/MensRights16/10/15 09:28 AM
5

You don't see how living in a system that makes some men this desperate is a MR issue? Hmmm. I think it's a fuckin' injustice that men are being sucked dry by the state on behalf of exwives who destroyed said men's families, enforcing their half of a contract after it was unilaterally violated by the other party - which is a travesty of the highest caliber. To be honest I don't understand why men are this meek in the first world, it's strange how so few exes are killed in situations like this. I…
/r/MensRights16/10/15 09:22 AM
2

I understand where this sentiment is coming from and there's no simple answer to your question, but let me tell you this: it's like asking what is the use for the night since the day is so much better. Humanity is femininity+masculinity together, even though most positive aspects of femininity are supressed and forgotten nowadays. The proper answer to feminism is not getting rid of the feminine aspect of humanity they mutilated beyond recognition, but to heal it so it can function properly again…
/r/MensRights16/10/15 08:30 AM
1

...and they never come back.
/r/MensRights16/10/15 07:52 AM
1

Existing most famously in feminist theory, the lesbian separatist communes of the 1970s called on women to claim lesbianism or celibacy and move out to rural farms deemed "womyn's lands." Today, some feminists are trying to revive the idea. If these communes didn't survive at all they're probably not the best idea ever... But let them try it again, it will be a breath of fresh air if the most hateful ones leave civilized society.
/r/MensRights16/10/15 07:51 AM
6

His goal isn't producing stuff the feminists take seriously, it's having fun despite their hissy fits, and I respect that. You can't win with feminists anyways, and I don't know why IlleFacitFinem is downvoted, he's perfectly right. Show me just one feminist who would change his/her stance if only the boobs in the comic strip were smaller or something. Blaming one's ignorance on the truth being presented in ways they dislike is just a lame excuse for being disingenuous, and feminists do this all…
/r/MensRights16/10/15 06:55 AM
2

Another attempt at regulating male sexuality with shaming language. It's no damn business of anyone else's what men watch or don't watch, and it's astonishingly arrogant for puritans to think they should have a say in it.
/r/MensRights15/10/15 12:25 PM
1

Short answer is yes. Pretty much all of the ideologies and political movements since the 1800s were invented / are now used to divide and conquer the sheeple, to divert attention from their exploitation to meaningless artificial problems and perpetual infighting. If you're stuck in the war of the sexes you don't have time to realize the banks are stealing everything... You don't have to be a leftist to realize this, in fact the political left-right divide is the same divide and conquer bullshit …
/r/MensRights05/10/15 10:48 AM
2

Women now earn 60-80% more university degrees than men, and they're just starting to realize this means not all of them can have partners whose education is on the same level or higher. Idiots. Men of course are pretty flexible about their partner's education, women on the other hand... Hypergamy can be a bitch if women's social status is boosted artificially by the state.
/r/MensRights05/10/15 10:14 AM
5

LoL Feminists don't hate men, but if you praise men in any way, shape or form you can't be a feminist anymore. The progressive left cannibalizes its own people, it happens to pretty much all of them sooner or later. Remember how Eve Ensler is a transphobe now?
/r/MensRights03/10/15 05:28 AM
12

Feminists think rape is about power because they think sex is about power, and that is because they use sex to manipulate their partners. They do not understand that most men want sex just for the sex, not to get something else out of it (committment, favors, promotion, money, whatever). They see rape as the rapist stripping the victim of her manipulative power, and they think it's a power play for the guy, like he's getting off on "controlling" his victim. It's not hard to realize that the femi…
/r/MensRights28/09/15 09:33 AM
1

I'm not saying the products are unethical, I'm saying when billions of dollars are at stake people tend to do unethical things, like selling medical products that are more harmful and/or less effective than advertised. This is a fact, it happened numerous times already and it will continue to happen as long as there's money in producing drugs, so having blind faith in the industry as a customer might not be the best strategy. Only a fool would say that they cheated like a 100 times but from now …
/r/MensRights26/09/15 06:24 AM
1

All vaccines have possible side effects which of course not always manifest. Here's the official leaflet of Gardasil, the most common HPV vaccine, look up its side effects if you want to, don't say I tried to scare you with some anti-vaxxer bullshit :) If you got yours without problems, more power to you. I'm not against people who get it, I just won't get it myself or recommend it to those interested in my opinion.
/r/MensRights25/09/15 02:52 PM
1

If I had any faith in the benevolence of pharmaceutical companies it would have been destroyed by the current Martin Shkreli fiasco. Luckily I never had the illusion that these companies are in the second most profitable trade behind arms dealing because they care so much about our health. My scepticism was fueled by cases like when Bayer knowingly sold AIDS-infected products to Africa after the US and Europe refused to buy them. Now the same crowd says this new vaccine is a miracle cure and I s…
/r/MensRights25/09/15 01:14 PM
8

Fucking hell.
/r/MensRights25/09/15 09:49 AM
-1

I am really sorry, but people die all the time. I won't let anyone stab me with a vaccine that is absolutely inefficient (but has possible side effects) just so somebody would feel better about their loved ones passing away. Pro-vaccine folks can call me names all day if they want to but this whole excercise is just a ploy for pharmaceutical companies to rake in billions of dollars for things we do not need. I see the benefit in vaccination against diseases that killed millions of people before,…
/r/MensRights25/09/15 09:46 AM
2

I clicked the first link and just now realized Sarkeesian is a midget. No wonder she has a humongous inferiority complex...
/r/MensRights24/09/15 02:19 PM
7

I am broken financially, spirtutally, and emotionally. Move to a different country and start a new life. This IS the point where you should go save lions in Africa or some other bullshit dream you always had but was never brave enough to follow. Disappear without a trace so the person who destroyed your life can't leech off you.
/r/MensRights23/09/15 12:53 PM
17

One of the play’s performers, Emily Parker, told theater blogger and professor Howard Sherman that the attendees were apparently unhappy about being forced to see the play. Geez, I wonder why anyone would be unhappy about being forced to attend such mindblowing bullshit for reasons of ideological indoctrination. Those hecklers must be rape apologists, amiright?
/r/MensRights09/09/15 02:42 PM
6

Yeah, keep them in fear. That'll show them who's boss.
/r/MensRights09/09/15 02:31 PM
10

One trick of feminism is to posit that the way those in power excercise their power is not laws and regulations but some invisible fraternity kind of thing. This way they can discard actual oppression (laws favoring some groups over others) and claim that the invisible bogeyman is still out there oppressing wymyn. In a way they project their own indirect forms of power onto men, like they always do. That all possible laws favor women means nothing, it's still them who are oppressed because Obama…
/r/MensRights06/09/15 08:44 AM
5

These men's rights activists are using a 1950s law to shut down women in tech They talk about the law against discrimination based on sex like it was some stupid relic of the 50's ready to be dismantled. So it's okay now to discriminate based on sex, or is it just okay when women do it against men?
/r/MensRights03/09/15 11:24 AM
13

I'd rather have my daughter have consensual sex while drunk (the majority of "rape" cases nowadays) than become a vile piece of human trash like Kate Harding. And not because I condone rape or any bullshit like that, but because I consider wretched freaks vomiting up hatred like her a lot more disgusting and destructive than people having consensual sex while drunk. The definition of rape is so diluted it is nearly meaningless now; everything is "rape" that a woman regrets for any reason. Femini…
/r/MensRights26/08/15 12:20 PM
6

The MRM is also explicitly clear that we would have very little issue with feminism as a movement if it stopped pretending to work on mens issues too, and accepted the MRM narrative as valid This is the polar opposite of the truth. The first problem with this argument is it views feminism as a valid movement addressing women's issues, but it isn't. The very core of all kinds of feminisms is distinctly false, ie. women are not oppressed by either men or a "patriarchal society" (something that was…
/r/MensRights23/08/15 08:51 AM
2

It's obvious that you have never seen anything Paul produced, you just adopt other people's assumptions - just like idiots who believe feminists when they smear the MRM. Are you willing to stop spreading idiotic stereotypes and actually listen to what people have to say with an open mind? Watch 3-4 videos made by Paul and then come back saying he "relies less on logic than feminists". Fuckin' hell. We should be way better than this.
/r/MensRights21/08/15 09:05 AM
2

You fail to understand that for the sheeple you're talking about we're maniacs as well. We don't need infowars for us to be smeared by idiots, they do it willingly without any justification. What you should care about instead of our public image is the fucking TRUTH. And if Paul happens to speak the truth you should support him, not throw him under the bus. The last thing we need is infighting between the forces that are all on our side, just with slightly different backgrounds.
/r/MensRights21/08/15 09:01 AM
4

Four police cars and six police turned up The word they were looking for is policeman. "Six police turned up" is such a laughably stupid thing to say.
/r/MensRights21/08/15 08:50 AM
1

Whoa, that is a perfect summary. I couldn't add or take away anything. Bravo, sir! Too bad most people can't think critically and won't understand any of it. It is in the instincts of both men and women to protect women and be suspicious of men, so it's only natural they instinctually believe feminism to be a benevolent movement, without analyzing its motives, aims, methods. Our tragedy is that most people are prisoners of their own instincts - they don't have the urge, the capability or the cou…
/r/MensRights21/08/15 08:41 AM
6

This might sound ludicrous at first but let's keep an open mind for a minute: if you look at feminism closely and examine its statements carefully pretty much all of them are lies and distortions. They depict both our history and our present like men were/are doing everything in their power to oppress and abuse women, which is the direct opposite of the truth. For example the 3 most important figures in the US in the past 7 years (Obama, Biden and Hillary) are all ardent feminists who never did …
/r/MensRights21/08/15 08:24 AM
2

Just a minor nitpick: solely because of their gender The thing you're referring to is their sex. The law doesn't give a hoot about gender. Please don't use the language that was created and forced upon us by feminists for subversive reasons.
/r/MensRights21/08/15 07:41 AM
1

It's so tiresome that people keep bringing up that one post that is half satire and half thought experiment. It's also saddening that people don't have the brains to understand what he's aiming at in that article, it's just a knee-jerk reaction from almost everyone: he wants to legalize rape, he wants to legalize rape! Well, no. If you came away with this conclusion you didn't understand what he meant, but you know what, I bet you didn't even read the post, you just parrot what you heard from ot…
/r/MensRights17/08/15 06:29 AM
-2

The first step in the right direction... The next one would be realizing that what he talks about is generally true. So, changing the title was a nice gesture, next time change the whole article.
/r/MensRights16/08/15 08:14 AM
2

You're not missing anything. This is how it went: We feminists only want equality, so we must arrange things that men get punished while women don't. I think we must make prostitution illegal. But if it's illegal women will be punished too! Yeah, right. So, let's say selling it is legal but buying is illegal. That way it's actually illegal altogether, since there's no way to sell or buy legally, but only men will get punished. What a genius! Hurray for ekvalitee!
/r/MensRights12/08/15 01:09 PM
2

Edit: after finishing this comment I read the others and realized that people already wrote about these things. I'll leave this here anyways. The actual "elite" is what sponsors both sides of all elections in the US. Politicians are not the elite, they're middlemen. It's not a secret. The elite forces feminism on us for the same reason it forces all other movements separating people into groups fighting each other based on race, sex, sexuality, politics, whatever: divide-and-conquer. As long as …
/r/MensRights11/08/15 12:24 PM
2

I hope you understand that Sandman is not the definitive source on MGTOW, he's just one of the folks generally agreeing with the basic premise. MGTOW per definitionem is a "movement" of men who all think and behave differently, as in, going their own way. MGTOWs don't go Sandman's way, it's just Sandman is one guy who goes his own way... if you catch my drift. What MGTOW actually means is following your own dreams and desires without giving a flying fuck about social pressures or the expectation…
/r/MensRights02/08/15 07:49 AM
3

Don't confuse feminism with women. We love women and we mock feminism, because feminism is the retarded notion that men oppress women - something that can't be done unconsciously, so it's directly implying that all men are evil. We should not be 'accepting' ideologies that are patently false, hateful and harmful.
/r/MensRights02/08/15 07:37 AM
2

Here's my open letter to him: Do not make a political statement out of your cuckold fetish, assclown. It's okay to have sexual perversions as long as you don't try to validate them by trying to foist them upon others disguised as a progressive ideology.
/r/MensRights24/07/15 10:40 AM
2

legally required
/r/MensRights23/07/15 01:56 PM
2

There are crimes that the state must press charges on, including statutory rape.
/r/MensRights21/07/15 04:03 PM
2

Funny thing is in most parts of the world having sex with a 14 yo is perfectly legal. Tough luck for him that he lives in a puritanical shithole.
/r/MensRights21/07/15 04:02 PM
2

And this is a genuine answer. I don't think I'm "indoctrinated with feminist bullshit" What I meant was your perspective on history was altered by them. Human history wasn't a class struggle between the sexes until feminism came along and made it so; in the old times people knew they had no other chance than to work together, so they did. They formed families and it's a silly assumption that the husband "oppressed" his wife, the father oppressed his daughter and so on. People weren't maniacs in …
/r/MensRights19/07/15 09:11 AM
1

Has extreme man-hating feminism already won, and we just don't know it? Erhm, we do know it. Calling it feminism is a joke and an insult to those of an earlier age when feminism did some good. That's an illusion, feminism was a weapon aimed at the general public from the get-go, a method used by the political elite to divide and conquer us . It still is - just look out the window and have the courage to accept what you see out there. Are we on one way ticket to whatever hell these nut cases have…
/r/MensRights18/07/15 10:12 AM
3

have never seen anything unsavoury posted What social justice bullies do to you doesn't depend on any objective measure of your decency, integrity or fairness. You're not a feminist? Banned. Next!
/r/MensRights15/07/15 11:25 AM
1

Buzz off with this bullshit. The fact that men work 25% more hours perfectly justifies them receiving 25% more money overall, assuming that jobs taken generally by men should pay the same as jobs generally taken by women, which is not a given by any means. I fail to see the fairness in paying a logger in alaska the same as a personal assistant in LA just because one's a man and the other's a woman and we should pay men and women the same because ekvalitee. Comparing men's and women's wages are s…
/r/MensRights15/07/15 11:22 AM
1

Multiplied by 100 if you want a percentage... 43 is 75.4% of 57.
/r/MensRights15/07/15 11:15 AM
3

this statistic is implying that a female would make $7.70/hr whereas a male would make $10.00/hr in a similar job No it doesn't. It implies they both earn $10/hr, but the man works 10 hours while the woman only works 7.5 hours, so the man earns $10 * 10 hours = $100 while the woman earns $10 * 7.5 hours = $75. This is the "wage gap". "Fixing" this would require women to receive the same sum for less hours of work, ie. a higher hourly wage than men.
/r/MensRights15/07/15 11:12 AM
20

Implicit in that statement is the fact that they tolerated it before. And how fucked up it is that they're going after jokes... again... Y'know, who cares about inmates getting raped, it's the people who joke about it that must be punished!
/r/MensRights15/07/15 10:48 AM
-1

a sexist male chauvinist who wants to ban abortion LoL You framed this like a feminist. Abortion is not a gendered issue. There are men & women on both the pro-life and pro-choice sides. It's not men vs. women, and being pro-life has nothing to do with male chauvinism. We are divided and conquered, we fight each other while the czars and despots of our times steal everything and laugh at our idiocy. That's all. All you have to do to ensure that people will fight amongst themselves forever is tel…
/r/MensRights13/07/15 08:40 AM
4

Girls are fed feminist bullshit practically from birth in the first world. Even those who aren't idiots tend to fall for the rhetoric... Hurray ekvalitee!
/r/MensRights10/07/15 12:38 PM
2

I don't see common sense as infuriating.
/r/MensRights10/07/15 12:33 PM
2

They use the words sexual assault in the text. Which is only logical since kicking someone is assault, not harassment.
/r/MensRights08/07/15 01:47 PM
4

Nobody is happy with results like this. He would never have done it if given the chance to decide consciously. We live in a world where shit has to happen and people wander in awe trying to figure out where their right minds went for that one minute when they destroyed their own life or reputation. That's like getting your free will back after a minute of predestination going on, so to speak. This probably isn't the place to get all philosophical, but hey :)
/r/MensRights08/07/15 11:20 AM
6

There was a story about a 7 yo boy kicking a bully in the groin and it was investigated as a sexual assault case. Googled it, here it is.
/r/MensRights08/07/15 10:19 AM
7

Your point is valid but the title says she also kicked him. That can hurt like hell despite him being a lot stronger. If an idiot kicked me in the shin or in the groin in a situation like this I'd definitely lose my temper.
/r/MensRights08/07/15 10:10 AM
19

She did the same thing to the guy in front of her: they both wanted to get to the bar in a crowd. It's more or less expected in crowded places and most people treat it as a minor annoyance. It's certainly not a good enough reason to raise your fist at another human being, and punching them in the face after they try to restrain you. This was a classic case of a woman thinking she could get away with literally anything because men always back down from a conflict with a woman. Well, not this time…
/r/MensRights08/07/15 10:07 AM
1

That was... unexpected. And funny.
/r/MensRights05/07/15 08:14 AM
1

There's a fundamental misunderstanding in thinking that feminism is a grass roots movement representing women in general, which could be emulated to achieve similar success. It never was and never will be. On the surface it's a sexual/economic trade union of upper middle class women; if you look behind the curtain it's a weapon designed by Marxists, used by the global political elite to divide and conquer the sheeple. It never really needed to "lobby" for anything because it is a tentacle of the…
/r/MensRights28/06/15 09:21 AM
1

A classic. Should be read by everyone here.
/r/MensRights23/06/15 12:50 PM
0

When feminists say they only want gender equality this is what they're thinking about. Coincidentally this is why you shouldn't accept the dictionary definition as valid defense against criticising feminism. Yeah, they only want "equality", which in their case means female supremacy. Do you need any more proof? How about feminists claiming that the US is less equal than other countries because women "only" outlive men by 3-4 years there, not the usual 6-7. More people needs to wake up and unders…
/r/MensRights23/06/15 12:46 PM
1

An italian woman named Lucrezia Marinella wrote a book called "The Nobility and Excellence of Women, and the Defects and Vices of Men", that got published in 1600. Excerpt: In Germany, where men are not permitted any sort of festive attire unless they are noble, every little woman adorns herself with festive drapes and different types of necklace, as is the habit all over the world. Women are honored everywhere with the use of ornaments that greatly surpass men’s, as can be observed. It is a mar…
/r/MensRights18/06/15 08:09 AM
1

Reducing CO2 emissions for example will decrease the rate at which global temperatures increase compared to if CO2 emissions weren't reduced. I just showed you - using government data! - that CO2 levels have risen by 10% in the last 20 years but the global temperatures didn't change a bit. You can't be this dense. The TV says that CO2 causes global warming and you meekly repeat that soundbite even though the graphs show that CO2 is rising like crazy but temperatures don't change at all. I can't …
/r/MensRights16/06/15 10:35 AM
1

Earth's climate is in a constant state of change and that mankind, as an actor within that environment necessarily has some effect upon it. This is just another statement that needs some proof to back it up. Earth's climate showed radical changes before mankind even existed, it's absolutely not a given that our mere existence is anything more than a spit in the ocean climate-wise. Other forces influencing our climate are so much more powerful and influential than we are that it is arrogance to t…
/r/MensRights16/06/15 07:05 AM
2

She named her sources and compared the current data to the alarmist warnings that polar bears would be extinct by now. She is absolutely right in that the predictions were wrong. You can twist the facts any way you like but her statements were 100% true. Also, if arctic ice did expand in the last few years (which it did) then the population decline of some polar bear groups can't be attributed to the "shrinking ice caps", can it? Oh, so if I say she's factually right I'm white knighting... LOL
/r/MensRights15/06/15 02:17 PM
2

Actually, logical argument is proof. It could be, if it is built on provable facts. But this: Simply by existing man has an impact on climate change. is not a logical argument, it's a statement based on what you think is 'common knowledge' or something. You have to prove statements like this with data or facts. Humanity isn't responsible for changing it, merely for influencing that change. How do you know that this is so? How much we influence climate and in what direction(s)? Can this be measur…
/r/MensRights15/06/15 02:05 PM
6

Insisting on something is not proof. I refuse to just accept at face value that humanity is somehow responsible for changing something that was never stable to begin with. We have detonated more than 1000 nuclear warheads and it didn't cause any observable changes in our climate, I wonder how afraid we should be because we breathe out CO2. It's hubris to think that we (little ants on a global scale) affect our planet so much. A volcano eruption could cause climate changes that make humanity prac…
/r/MensRights15/06/15 10:55 AM
1

It was just an accusation. Watch her video that caused the shitstorm, she doesn't say anything that could be interpreted as "climate change isn't real". She says the predictions from the 90's and 00's were wrong, which is true.
/r/MensRights15/06/15 10:11 AM
9

Watch her video. Everything she says is 100% defensible and factual. Not once does she say or even imply that climate change is not real. The TL;DR of it is that there's no need to panic just yet because none of the alarmist predictions have come true. Which is true. It shows how ignorant people are that practically nobody watched her video (not even the guy asking the question on the AMA), they just spread baseless bullshit about her that matched their preconceptions about someone who's an anti…
/r/MensRights15/06/15 10:07 AM
4

its been proven beyond any doubt that climate change is happening True. It doesn't even need proving, the Earth's climate was never stable. ...and is affected by humans False. Link me actual proof that it is us who made the climate change and I will give you reddit gold for a year. Any percentage of scientists "thinking so" is not proof. I want a step-by-step description of what humanity did, how that caused the climate to change, and what proof is there that it wouldn't have changed if it weren…
/r/MensRights15/06/15 08:53 AM
5

They will even donate to restore the broken window!
/r/MensRights14/06/15 07:12 AM
2

It was fun until the tattoo guy came out as more of a feminist than she is... I don't understand how can people not realize that feminism is bullshit even after being attacked by it for idiotic made-up reasons. We could call this the Whedon syndrome.
/r/MensRights14/06/15 06:12 AM
27

Why would we encourage men to choose a profession more dangerous than fishing on the Nordic seas or logging in Alaska - only with less prestige and lower pay?
/r/MensRights12/06/15 11:53 AM
5

No man should partake in Toronto Pride from now on.
/r/MensRights11/06/15 11:29 AM
4

The usual feminist bullshit, conflating everything with everything else. Woman-haters (many of whom are women) can express themselves all over the place, as the latest cartoon about women drivers reminds me Thinking whatever about women drivers is not the hatred of women. At worst it's a negative stereotype, which does not equal hatred. man-haters are in the minority; for every Valerie Solanas, how many rapists, how many male murderers are there? So murderers are now misogynists as well, because…
/r/MensRights08/06/15 12:13 PM
1

In many cases it's not that hard to guess the sexes of the participants so the sentences will probably never meet in the middle.
/r/TheRedPill01/06/15 12:39 PM
5

Men don't want to be seen as weak because women generally find weak men unattractive. It's in our genes now thanks to millions of years of natural selection. There are also similar, loosely related reasons that are all based on our instincts, like projecting higher social status by belittling other men, etc. Men are designed by nature to care about women and children, and to disregard their own problems. This is why feminism is a total scam but it is also why it's successful. Men who resist male…
/r/MensRights01/06/15 07:25 AM
4

Came here to say the same thing. Have an upvote.
/r/MensRights01/06/15 07:03 AM
7

How on earth would #1 be true considering the wage gap doesn't even exist??? Fuck me it's stupid. It cannot narrow or widen because it is a hoax. It compares the averages of all men working full-time and all women working full-time - it is literally meaningless for all intents and purposes. It compares loggers in alaska to secretaries in L.A. This supposed wage gap was never about people doing the same jobs with the same qualifications. The fact that men in general earn more than women is absolu…
/r/MensRights20/05/15 11:37 AM
16

We live in a messed up generation of fuckwits who believe themselves to be the "saviors of the oppressed", thus morally superior to everyone else, but who couldn't form a coherent, logical thought in their brains to save their lives. Sad thing is this is the result of a purposeful design: education, media, politics, etc. are all intentionally dumbed down to create sheeple who are easier to rule over than a nation of well-informed critical thinkers.
/r/MensRights20/05/15 09:41 AM
1

Somehow I doubt that Arthur being a closeted gay with a cuckold fetish was an integral part of the original myth which is one of the pillars of the English national identity plus a part of the common male identity in the western world. This angle was added by the French, who liked the English very much as we all know, and in modern times it was most famously 'explored' in The Mists of Avalon by Marion Zimmer Bradley, a radical feminist manhater. It was never canon, for good reason. Certain speci…
/r/MensRights17/05/15 11:54 AM
-1

Sure, sure, and I can only imagine what the feminist reaction would be if Hollywood made a high budget remake of Thelma & Louise or the Cunt with the dragon tattoo where the title characters would be sidekicks to male protagonists. I'm absolutely sure they would never throw a hissy fit and they would all just accept that as culture being the property of a species, what-the-fuck-ever that means. Our culture is getting feminized at a frightening pace and idiots like you pretend that it's something…
/r/MensRights17/05/15 07:35 AM
-8

I don't get why people don't get the problem. if the plot, as I understand it, involves a bunch of women trying to escape a crazy tribal post apocalyptic society where they're treating as breeding fodder, then that's pretty legitimate YES! But then don't name it Mad Max, don't make this as the Mad Max remake. Make it as an independent movie and I won't give a damn. But Mad Max was a male cult classic, and transforming it into a tale about women (with Max only being a secondary character who gets…
/r/MensRights16/05/15 06:27 AM
3

The feminist slant wasn't as bad as I had been led to believe by reviews and commentary. From your description of the movie there's lots of feminist propaganda in there, it just seems... "normal" because it is everywhere nowadays. It doesn't stand out too much from the general feminist propaganda we are constantly bombarded with.
/r/MensRights16/05/15 06:24 AM
-3

Although I don't give a shit about the portrayal of "strong empowered women" in film, I care about classic masculine movies being ruined by getting sneakily transformed into feminist propaganda. The original Mad Max was centered around a strong male character many guys could identify with. Suddenly the title character gets demoted to a secondary role while being humiliated and abused by a new protagonist, who just happens to be a female trained by manhater Eve Ensler. Fuck off. This is the inten…
/r/MensRights16/05/15 05:28 AM
2

Andy Gonzales and Sophie Houser, two New York City high school students who coded the feminist game Tampon Run. "Feminist game". Because all feminists want is equality, right? So they shoot men. With tampons. the game spread like wildfire, and the two were (...) invited to speak at a local TEDx talk for Youth Day. What the actual mind numbing fuck?! Two highschoolers make a stupid game and suddenly they're shining beacons of social justice? Making a game where you shoot men with tampons is a goo…
/r/MensRights12/05/15 10:01 AM
3

When police later visited Stephens she admitted to stabbing Mr Heslin but attested that he had tried to punch her. This was just a drunken stabbing incident up until this point. After saying this she should rot in prison for life. [she] had a criminal history ... the victim was in court to support [her] and that the couple were still in a relationship People are idiots.
/r/MensRights12/05/15 09:33 AM
2

I'm eager to hear why it's men's fault. Any links?
/r/MensRights12/05/15 09:24 AM
2

This is beyond belief. If we, the people of the west, were actually sane, we'd be fleeing these fucked up countries right now. The only problem is there's no good place to escape to.
/r/MensRights07/05/15 12:23 PM
1

Erhm, more like "the police ignored me, violated my rights and pushed me aside because I'm only a women". Classic damseling, guaranteed coverage in the press.
/r/MensRights07/05/15 07:20 AM
2

I wonder if chinese women also think the man should keep his house in case of a divorce...
/r/MensRights06/05/15 07:22 AM
25

the idea itself infantilizes women, making it the enemy of feminism, not the weapon, and most feminists recognise this You make the mistake of taking feminist PR at face value. Most feminists recognize fuckall, they just love anything that paints men in a negative light. They won't admit this openly of course, but if you want to understand them don't listen to what they say, look at what they do. And this is what they do: post flyers that there's a suspicious man out there looking for a chance t…
/r/MensRights06/05/15 07:19 AM
1

Isn't it fucked up beyond belief when women have sex with total strangers in darkness, based on a photo and some demented spiel about a trendy female-porn bestseller? And then they complain that it was a different total stranger than the one they were expecting... And they say men are shallow for judging women on their looks. Plus they fake indignation when TRPers say that women are hypergamic in nature and have a shady side to their sexuality as well. Sure, they would suck a good looking moneye…
/r/MensRights05/05/15 11:49 AM
7

more women live in poverty Yeah, this must be the case because feminists say so and they would never lie about stuff like this. It doesn't matter that when you actually look at the bottom of society - the downtrodden, the homeless - men outnumber women at least 4-to-1.
/r/MensRights05/05/15 10:55 AM
5

Narrowing it down to the US for a second, what can you do when the president, the vice president, and the ex-secretary of state/next president are all radical feminists? Feminism is in power, they don't give a rat's ass about what we think or do. If we protest peacefully, they shit on us. No amount of petitions or internet controversy will change anything as long as they have all the political power - they just ignore us without consequences. So, the problem is not with this sub - it's with the …
/r/MensRights02/05/15 08:24 AM
3

We live in a world that doesn't give a shit about men. More precisely, it treats men as oppressive shitlords and interchangeable, disposable resources. Strangely enough there's only a few people who think this is a problem. The MRM is looking for political solutions while TRP is looking for personal ones. Thing is, political solutions do not work. Politicians do not care about men, or the MRM for that matter. To put it bluntly, the MRM is kinda' impotent. It's not our fault, the system is rigged…
/r/MensRights02/05/15 08:02 AM
1

There's not a good solution for men's reproductive rights. Currently, we don't have any. I think we technically agree on most aspects of this topic, we just approach the subject from different angles. The rhetoric isn't wrong when they say it's all about the kid. If the authorities would actually care about kids they would look up statistics about child poverty, child deliquency, school dropout rates, etc. etc. These are the objective numbers showing what is in the interest of the child and what…
/r/MensRights30/04/15 09:48 AM
1

No, it does matter. I can't create a responsibility and force it on you just because people are suckers for babies and will support women in the name of babies. It is not right. I hate how western socities have lost their sense of fairness (if they ever had one). A woman has total control over her reproductive facilities, why is it then that men are held responsible for women's choices? Who fixes the problem? I say let women who give birth outside of marriage raise their children. Period. Why wo…
/r/MensRights30/04/15 07:26 AM
37

You know you live in "a man's world" when a homeless man risks his own life to save a woman he doesn't even know and people let him bleed to death. Some fuckin' patriarchy this is. Maybe he deserved it, he probably oppressed that woman before saving her, right? More than an hour and twenty minutes after he collapsed the authorities arrived because somebody called the cops saying a woman was screaming. Let that sink in for a minute, for mulitple reasons. One: when seconds count, the cops are only…
/r/MensRights30/04/15 07:14 AM
1

But the one creating the child, and the responsibility that comes with it, is the woman. "Look, I made this against your will and now you're responsible for it." Referring to the interests of the child is just a sick way of transferring responsibility for female decisions onto males.
/r/MensRights30/04/15 06:24 AM
7

Well, fuck me, she's partially right. He is not a real woman. The wage gap argument is total bullshit though, of course. I hope we can find the common sense middle ground in arguments like this. Saying a man is not a woman isn't "transphobia", it's just pointing out a fucking fact. "Man" and "woman" are sexes, not up to interpretation or personal preference. Wishing you were born into the other sex or experimenting with crossdressing will not change this.
/r/MensRights29/04/15 08:38 AM
11

Isn't it fantasticly absurd how it's a show with so much sexuality but talking about it even in mild terms is strictly prohibited? Please don't sexually objectify the characters who suck and fuck and rape naked on screen with reckless abandon... Not being allowed to even admit finding a character attractive for a show about every sexual perversion ever is one solid definition of 'retarded'.
/r/MensRights24/04/15 09:25 AM
3

Google cached version since the page has gone missing: Even if a woman consents to have sex with another adult, according to Guardian author Gaby Hinsliff, it’s still likely rape. In an article titled “Consent is not enough: if you want a sexual partner, look for enthusiasm,” Ms. Hinsliff argues that, even if a woman says she would like to have sex with you, if she does not do it enthusiastically, you are a rapist. Hinsliff’s subtitle reads, “The furore over rape prosecution guidance from the CP…
/r/MensRights24/04/15 08:48 AM
3

If you do not concentrate on sex trafficking but look at trafficking in general, the ratio of male victims is much higher.
/r/MensRights22/04/15 11:59 AM
1

Show her some CHS videos.
/r/MensRights19/04/15 11:26 AM
45

A week old marriage can probably be annulled instead of having a divorce...
/r/MensRights15/04/15 08:41 AM
1

In a sexually open, matriarchal society, men would look out for the group as a whole, leading to greater social cohesion. This doesn't necessarily follow from the premise. Men don't really have a stake in such a community, there is no real motivating force for them to sacrifice themselves or work excessively. This is why matriarchies never progressed beyond middle-age conditions, like the Musou in China for example. Monogamic tribes might even have stronger social bonds because of the precisely …
/r/MensRights14/04/15 11:59 AM
0

If you think about it, it's unavoidable. Feminism at its roots is the notion that men oppress women. If you are oppressed, you are per definitionem a victim. And how does an oppressed victim feel about her oppressors? It's a cognitive dissonance they can't sort out. On one hand they think they don't hate men because they generally don't want to see themselves as persons full of hate - on the other hand they think they are constantly victimized and will inescapably have subconscious bad feelings …
/r/MensRights14/04/15 11:25 AM
1

Jessica Valenti is the undisputed international champion of this quasi-political clickbait bullshit. All she writes is there to enrage the most amount of people possible. She's not stupid, she's a troll who gets paid for the pageviews she generates.
/r/MensRights14/04/15 11:00 AM
1

you are essentially telling all wives of millionaires "you have to work a full time job even if it makes zero financial sense and produces a worse outcome for your family" Nope, I'm telling them if a man earns a lot of money and they want access to that money they should stay with the man. If you leave him, you leave his money as well. You can't have it both ways. What he earns is his. If you think you will leave him at some point start earning your own money, or be prepared to find a job after …
/r/MensRights11/04/15 10:28 AM
8

Her contributions are not worth zero dollars here. Whatever her contribution is worth was more than graciously compensated 'in real time' by her living luxuriously on his expense. What you are implying here is that whatever it was she did for him was worth not only the millions she spent while married, but tens of millions more - something she should have received during the marriage but didn't. I wonder what this mystical thing she provided for him could be, considering how the wife of the poor…
/r/MensRights10/04/15 10:19 AM
4

Except, if you think about it, the very core of the basic idea is totally stupid. How do you justify saying that if he was gracious enough to support a leech for 32 years it's now his "responsibility" to support that leech even more when it decides to leave him? That's like saying you gave her so much, now you must give her even more because... reasons? Because she got used to the lifestyle? That's a retarded reasoning if I ever saw one. If you buy a homeless guy a burger two days in a row shoul…
/r/MensRights10/04/15 10:01 AM
2

Yeah, nowadays if a girl explicitly wants to avoid sex it's probably because of her previous unpleasant experiences. The sister of one of my buddies is such a woman - she became a "reformed virgin" and caught a sucker who was willing to wait for sex until marriage with a woman who isn't an actual virgin and considers sex a nuisence at best. Some fine marriage that will be... It's very sad but I can't explain things any other way: most men are idiots.
/r/MensRights10/04/15 09:37 AM
8

women are no different from men with regards to sexual opportunity Erhm, maybe you should watch this before making a clown of yourself. As a feminist you imagine that men have everything approximately the same as women, only better because they oppress women. You can't grasp how certain dynamics (like dating for example) are totally different from the two opposing perspectives. Regardless of all the postmodern crap about gender roles, it is still men who have to initiate contact. If men would ju…
/r/MensRights08/04/15 10:22 AM
3

Sometime I hate trolls, sometimes I love them :) How, in any universe, does sex come to every woman, without effort, from everywhere and everyone? Disregarding the fact the he didn't say anything like this... Lie down on a street naked and men will come to fuck you. Oh, you only want sex with attractive men? That doesn't change the fact that you could get sex any day if you really wanted to. Hell, men would even pay you for it. You just have to lower your standards and accept the approaches of m…
/r/MensRights08/04/15 09:41 AM
3

Are boy and girl sexual abuse victims viewed the same? LOL
/r/MensRights08/04/15 08:32 AM
2

Cases of true, malicious fabrications by people who are neither mentally ill nor facing some other disaster should be taken seriously and punished by law. But those cases shouldn’t be used as a weapon against people who make a terrible mistake in a desperate bid for aid. This can be said about rapists as well. How do you determine if a man raping a woman isn't "a desperate bid for aid"? Mentally unstable and fatally lonely people like Elliot Rodgers are indeed in a very desperate need of aid but…
/r/MensRights08/04/15 07:41 AM
10

The Pinal County Attorney also issued a brief statement on the case saying, "Tyler Kost is presumed innocent unless proven guilty." Sure, but he's been in jail for more than a year now. Some fuckin' justice system. I wonder if he'll get any compensation, or if the false accusers will be prosecuted.
/r/MensRights08/04/15 07:07 AM
6

The whole story is silly, especially the spin Vice puts on it. Six guys get drunk after half a year of isolation from women, and one of them grabs the only woman's ass in sight: sexism!!! What the fuck is 'sexist' about this? It was a psychological experiment about how people would cope with isolation - and one or two of them became psychologically unstable. What's also apparent from the story is that mission control didn't want to fuck the russian astronauts over just because one of them wanted…
/r/MensRights04/04/15 05:42 PM
17

If she meant this seriously she might stab you in the back any day with anything - a gotcha pregnancy, a false rape accusation, etc. I'm pretty much against telling people on the internet to break up their LTRs, but man, this is a huge red flag. If you have any other prospects jump ship ASAP.
/r/MensRights04/04/15 06:45 AM
8

What is this bullshit? I couldn't read more than 3-4 sentences because it's unreadable, and because of this I couldn't even determine who or what is being mocked here. It doesn't have proper context or a point to make, it's just an idiotic mass of loosely related words.
/r/MensRights31/03/15 07:39 AM
2

Killing someone is violence. SINGING ABOUT finding a dead body and fucking it, ie. stuff that obviously never happened, is NOT violence. The song doesn't contain any hints about murdering anyone. It starts with "Finally found a whore, She was right and dead.", ie. it wasn't the, erhm, protagonist who did the killing, he just found the body. It seems you didn't read the article before commenting. But your words remind me of the youtube video where a swedish SCUM fanclub acted out shooting a man i…
/r/MensRights26/03/15 12:38 PM
3

There was literally and absolutely no violence involved in the story. The song didn't incite any violence either, because nowhere does it say anything like you should murder or rape anybody. What you are arguing here is that if I drunkenly boast that I have shot Jesus in the face, punishing me is reasonable because killing is violence. Oh, or is it only violence if the targets are imaginary women? These guys made an obvious joke not intended to hurt anybody, and their actions did indeed hurt nob…
/r/MensRights26/03/15 12:25 PM
3

Fucking hell. Anything you do to an inanimate object is not "violence against women". Fucking a dead anything is not rape and not sexual violence. I can't believe you don't understand the difference between a handful of idiots singing a drunken song at a party and the media universally bashing men left and right. If all feminists were doing is singing at parties, nobody would give a microscopic fuck about it, ever. Remind me of this silly debate again when you see drunken groups chanting this st…
/r/MensRights26/03/15 12:05 PM
3

Yet they didn't murder or rape anybody. Can you understand the conceptual difference between words and actions?
/r/MensRights26/03/15 11:53 AM
3

glorifying extreme sexual violence Necrophilia is not violence, and drunken chants do not 'glorify' anything. Quite the opposite, these chants are intentionally designed to offend people, to cause uproar. Nobody will think better of fucking dead prostitutes after hearing this song. I find it disturbing that people nowadays can't differentiate between a tastelss drunken joke and intent to commit or incite crime. You can rest assured, none of those rugby fans have ever fucked a dead prostitute and…
/r/MensRights26/03/15 11:38 AM
3

There is a difference between raping women and singing a song while drunk about dead prostitutes. As in, one is a crime, the other is a silly chant. By saying that feminists shouldn't be able to arbitrarily censor people (much less disband rugby teams) we don't defend crimes against women.
/r/MensRights26/03/15 11:30 AM
1

Thing is, the university disbanded the rugby team indefinitely How is that justified based on the drunken chant of their fans? Also, fucking a dead body - disgusting as it might be - is not rape and not violence against women. This song is clearly just a bunch of bullshit chanted by drunken idiots, it does not promote anything. Nobody will rape or beat a woman, or fuck a dead prostitute just because he heard/sang that song. SJWs don't understand the concept that some things are not meant literal…
/r/MensRights26/03/15 11:24 AM
1

An ad designed for a porn magazine is "sexist". My fuckin' god.
/r/MensRights26/03/15 11:10 AM
1

Yeah, it's lunacy.
/r/MensRights25/03/15 12:39 PM
3

The president, the vice-president and the ex-secretary of state / next president of the US are all ardent feminists. They drafted laws and started programs that help women and hinder men in many ways. Do you need any more proof that feminism is the establishment than the 3 most important figures in US politics being radical feminists who have literally never favored men over women, not once in their careers - but are doing the exact opposite practically every day? The most important tenet of a p…
/r/MensRights25/03/15 12:36 PM
2

If you look at the graph, the original difference isn't much bigger. The document is unreachable now so I'm kinda' paraphrasing here based on memory, but it's strange how a 5% difference is significant enough when it favors women, but a 3% difference is insignificant if it paints women in a bad light. In the TIL post about the same topic there are dozens of white knights rushing to the aid of women pointing out that the 3% difference is not conclusive. Sure... This bias favoring women, minimizin…
/r/MensRights25/03/15 12:18 PM
21

"Street harassment" is a feminist fad for the demonization and shaming of men, just like the manspreading and manslamming idiocies. First of all, the definition of harassment is repeated behaviour intended to disturb others. Saying hello on the street is not harassment, even if some no-lifers find it embarrassing. Second of all, who the fuck are these feminists that they think they can make rules about how people can or can't interact??? I do whatever the fuck I want, thank you very much, and if…
/r/MensRights24/03/15 11:51 AM
15

Indoctrinating children like this is one of the sickest things imaginable.
/r/MensRights24/03/15 08:37 AM
4

Am I wrong in assuming that posts detailing gender bias against women are unwelcome in this sub? If I am, I'll delete this post ASAP. You don't need to delete anything. If you think there is genuine discrimination against women out there, name it. But be prepared that your assertions will be closely examined and disputed. We don't accept anything at face value here, we want solid facts. If you find this type of rigorous intellectual debate unpleasant or annoying (like 90%+ of people seem to nowa…
/r/MensRights23/03/15 12:36 PM
5

Try humanist, egalitarian or equalist subs, if there are any. But really, you won't find anyone here wanting unequal rights for men and women. That is something only feminists advocate for. And I'm not saying this because I'm ignorant, I'm saying this because there are laws out there created by feminists that are explicitly unequal - like VAWA for example. You seem to think that feminism and the MRM are the opposite ends of the spectrum you want to find the middle of, but it's not true. It's not…
/r/MensRights23/03/15 12:11 PM
5

Feminism isn't a gender, it's a political movement. A couple of weeks ago, a feminist figurehead announced that the CDC will lose all of its prostate cancer funding. Tell me with a straight face that feminism doesn't hurt men's interests.
/r/MensRights23/03/15 11:29 AM
4

INB4 ppl suggest this sub or 2x. Is there a sub where neither gender is vilified or blamed Erhm, could you please specify which gender is vilified or blamed here? If not, take your unfounded prejudices about us and sod off.
/r/MensRights23/03/15 10:38 AM
3

"Show me a feminist program for addressing male underrepresentation in higher education."
/r/MensRights19/03/15 09:01 AM
3

Simplest answer ever: if video games are more fun than you, well, it's not our fault. Be worthy of the attention you so sorely demand and you will get it. Until then you can sod off, we are free individuals freely deciding what to do with our lives. If you don't like it, tough luck. Is it our job to accommodate your desires? Nope. You seem to have forgotten that relationships are two sided deals. You have to offer something we want in order to get what you want.
/r/MensRights18/03/15 10:50 AM
6

The proper response from DC should have been to issue a statement that Batgirl (and possibly all other female superheroes) will be discontinued immediately because if not only they can't be beaten by male heroes/villains, but they can't even fight each other (because mysygyny!!!), then they have become utterly, totally, mind-bogglingly useless. What purpose does a comic book superhero serve who can't be attacked, threatened, or even - gasp! - disrespected by villains? This is proof positive that…
/r/MensRights18/03/15 10:32 AM
1

The repression of sexuality was a conscious design created by the social engineers of early societies thousands of years ago. These wise men (I'm pretty sure they were men) realized that if you want to motivate free men into working like oxen (as opposed to enslave them and force them to do the same) you have to give them something to work for. If an independent free man is left to his own devices he will probably do the absolute minimum needed for suvival and laugh at others who want him to wor…
/r/MensRights12/03/15 08:51 AM
1

Men want the most sex, and the least possible price, not the least at the highest possible price. There is a fundamental problem in your thinking, namely that when anything benefits anyone you strictly assume that it must be a one-sided deal consciously initiated by the beneficiary, manipulating/forcing the other party into working against their own interests. Yes, men working to provide for their families is beneficial for women, but the whole deal is also beneficial for men in many ways. It wa…
/r/MensRights12/03/15 08:20 AM
2

I've read some of the pdf and it's pure bullshit. I don't know why Baumeister gave his name to crap like this. It's built on shallow (feminist) theories about the oppression of women, one sex controlling society for their own benefit, confusing political power for social power, etc. A cursory reading of Rob Fedders' blog would make it clear why this is nonsense. I'm shocked, actually, this is very poor research. I expected so much more from Baumeister after his superb essay on men. For starters,…
/r/MensRights11/03/15 03:17 PM
1

Putting a name behind a theory doesn't make it automatically correct. I wonder how he could "research" the reasoning behind the supression of female sexuality thousands of years ago, where people didn't talk much about these issues, let alone put them in writing. As far as I'm concerned Baumeister's guess is as good as anyone's until he provides something tangible to sway my opinion. I will read the pdf you linked above and see what it has to offer... But it will take a bloody good argument to c…
/r/MensRights11/03/15 02:41 PM
1

Thats what the evidence shows about slut shaming, its a female tactic to manipulate men. The very basis of your theiry is flawed because you presuppose a collective conscious effort on the part of women in general aimed at manipulating men in general for their own benefit. This is for all intents and purposes a conspiracy theory, and while some conspiracy theories are true, this isn't one of them. Women are not agreeing with each other to shame and abuse each other into repressing their own sexu…
/r/MensRights11/03/15 01:23 PM
0

You seem to believe in a conspiracy much like the feminist one where one sex came together and agreed on fucking over the other. Don't take this personally but that's just silly. What you see around you nowadays is proof positive that when women are left to their own devices the last thing on their minds is repressing their own sexuality. Men want sex more than women because testosterone is the "horniness hormone" in both sexes but men have about 10 times as much. And it's a basic principle of e…
/r/MensRights11/03/15 12:24 PM
1

Erhm, nope. That people value women over men is not "female manipulation". It's based on our sexual dimorphism as a species, ie. ovums being more valuable than sperm. (Oversimplifying quite a bit but still.)
/r/MensRights11/03/15 12:04 PM
1

Thing is, you can't fight biology and you damn well shouldn't even try, because it always leads to destruction and suffering. If people in general treat women as more valuable than men, you can't force them to change. Your only chance is to build a system that exploits the way humanity works. Actual patriarchy worked well because when it saw the disposability of men it offered them rewards for it. The disposability will never go away (this is the meaning of GWW's question at the end), the only q…
/r/MensRights11/03/15 11:10 AM
1

I find it pretty sad that people with leftist leanings got hoodwinked into thinking that "traditionalism" is the bogeyman we should fight. It is an illusion. Count how many people in the white house call themselves traditionalists. Now compare that to the number of feminists. Notice anything peculiar? Feminism is royally fucking up the lives of people in the west but leftists are more afraid of an imaginary conservative conspiracy... Fucknuts. Can anyone name just one self-proclaimed "traditiona…
/r/MensRights11/03/15 10:34 AM
2

Take over the government You're funny... force people to care about men ...but you lost me here. Enforced "caring" becomes hate in a second. Feminism is trying to force men into caring about women and look how fine that worked out for them. The last thing men need is the government trying to help them by forcing anyone to do anything. We would be immeasurably better off if the government just became totally blind to sex (mistakenly called gender by idiots) and just discontinued any and every pro…
/r/MensRights11/03/15 10:23 AM
3

MGTOWs are not a group, you shouldn't refer to them as such. That some idiots have delusions about traditionalism says nothing (and I mean nothing) about the MGTOW philosophy. Stop framing things as "something/someone vs MGTOW", it does not compute.
/r/MensRights11/03/15 10:13 AM
6

"Police had to intervene" really means the feminists just called the police for no particular reason besides feeling like having a non-feminist opinion is "threatening".
/r/MensRights06/03/15 09:16 AM
1

We have reached a phase where feminists feel they can just openly boss men around. They feel they can now micromanage everything a man does according to their whims. It's a symbolic castration of men in general. Or a giant shit test, if you will. Manspreading, manslamming, now this idiocy, and the initiatives to force men to pee sitting down on toilets... It's beyond orwellian. The only relevant answer is fuck you, you're not my mother and not my boss, I will do whatever I please.
/r/MensRights06/03/15 08:37 AM
2

Add "wo" to make it more interesting. Be sure not to get caught in the act.
/r/MensRights05/03/15 09:14 AM
2

Do you think that it is disingenuous for men to care about the MRM in private, but not to risk associating themselves with its name publicly? It's not. But it's very telling that you are practically forced to do this. If a political movement keeps you in fear to prevent you from fighting for your equal human rights, it is abundantly clear who's the 'oppressor'. What do you think about the red pill people, and how they affect public perception of men who care about equal rights? TRP has nothing t…
/r/MensRights02/03/15 10:12 AM
11

I'm a bit tired now so forgive me for the occasional sarcasm. My intentions are good. I've been a feminist since I was a young kid I wonder how you'd react to a statement like "I've been a christian since I was a young kid". I bet you'd think the narrow minded family made sure their kid is properly indoctrinated. But in the case of feminism it's even worse because it has serious political undertones no kid can even begin to grasp. I'm a little nervous about posting here You shouldn't be. We migh…
/r/MensRights27/02/15 08:53 AM
4

the 7 to 8 billion people on the planet are in no real danger of being extinct He's not talking about the present, but the tribal past. Also, people's subconscious minds don't register that there are many people living in faraway places. In modern societies men are still treated as disposable and women are still valuable regardless of changing circumstances or logical arguments.
/r/MensRights21/02/15 01:21 PM
1

Erhm, lol? Even if your statement was true (which it isn't), what would that have to do with feminism being a leftist institution here and now? Look at the media for christ's sake, who advocates for feminism? The Guardian, the NYT, the SPLC, et cetera. All leftist publications and organizations. Who is against feminism? Breitbart, National Review, etc. Ie, all rightists. Pull out your head from the sand, please.
/r/MensRights19/02/15 12:40 PM
3

In case you haven't noticed the trend, there is a clear attempt in the more "liberal" media to conflate MRA's with tradcons. There is also an attempt to conflate feminism with the supposed "left," which actually hasn't existed in any meaningful sense since the 1940's. In so many fancy words you have described that liberals (ie. the new left) consider us rightists because feminism is a leftist institution and we attack it. They "accuse us" of being rightists exactly because they are leftists, oth…
/r/MensRights16/02/15 08:59 AM
-2

It looks like a good attempt at stealing reddit account names/passwords. I bet they will be sued for copying reddit.
/r/MensRights09/02/15 07:57 AM
1

And it can't be demanded, just like respect... If it's demanded, it will necessarily be fake and humiliating. If anybody forced you to apologize ever, you must realize this.
/r/MensRights06/02/15 07:17 AM
-2

Came in here to say the same thing. We're not emotional terrorists demanding that others humiliate themselves before us. A man cancels his t-mobile subscription (maybe tell them about it in a factual tone) and that's it.
/r/MensRights05/02/15 10:30 AM
1

We're not doing anything and it's your fault!!!
/r/MensRights04/02/15 08:49 PM
3

They attack us as right-wing because they are left-wing... It's only logical. If they were on the right, this wouldn't work at all, would it?
/r/MensRights03/02/15 09:16 AM
2

You happen to have the same misunderstanding "good feminists" have. You ask why outsiders criticize your group while YOU only want good things for everyone... The modern political left is a farce much like feminism. The sooner you realize this the better for you. The original ideas and ideals of the left weren't bad, but it was taken over politically by the cultural marxist/progressive/SJW crowd who destroyed anything valuable in the left.
/r/MensRights03/02/15 09:14 AM
5

I can only imagine what feminists would be like now if the same ad would have been made to celebrate men - with an all male cast including Bill Burr (or Paul Elam) who'd say "sorry it's a girl". I'm pretty sure their answer would be the same: no sexism here, just a harmless joke.
/r/MensRights03/02/15 08:06 AM
8

This guy's a genius, his other videos are fantastic as well. He deserves more recognition.
/r/MensRights01/02/15 09:13 PM
3

War doesn't have 'perpetrators'. Men don't go to war because they like it - most of them go to protect their countries and families, and the rest because they are ordered to. But this is 100% irrelevant, since the question at hand is: should men have human rights equal to that of women? And the writer of the article answers "no, because men fight in wars". How fuckin' stupid is that? That's basically an open admission that men are second class citizens because feminists see them as subhumans. Bu…
/r/MensRights31/01/15 08:32 PM
2

A link to the John Chait article referenced in the post would have helped. Here it is.
/r/MensRights30/01/15 08:45 AM
-1

The "I wonder how it could be possible" part should clue you in that I meant this as a kind of sarcastic rhetorical question. But no, people have to take everything literally and dead serious nowadays...
/r/MensRights30/01/15 07:46 AM
2

Tell her your version of the story, and if she does not understand, well, you're fucked. You either divorce her (which might trigger an actual rape accusation) or you forfeit your right to a normal life. Any sane person would understand what happened though, so there is hope.
/r/MensRights28/01/15 03:34 PM
1

If the kid isn't mine I don't really want to blow up their life either. If the kid is yours you still shouldn't blow up their lives. Or you think the other guy will gladly raise your child with a cheating whore if you send checks? You can't be an involved father either way, so better keep silent and hope it's his.
/r/MensRights28/01/15 10:33 AM
-4

I wonder how it could be possible for people to pay a small sum of money (like a movie ticket price) that would be subtracted from the income of the movie.
/r/MensRights28/01/15 08:29 AM
0

Imagine a boot stamping on a human face forever, saying "I KNOW YOU FEEL UPSET RE STAMPING, BUT THAT'S DIFFERENT FROM STRUCTURAL OPPRESSION" — Scott Alexander (@slatestarcodex) December 31, 2014
/r/MensRights28/01/15 08:14 AM
3

Sure, it's not your fault and it's okay to ask. It's just disheartening when these questions pile up and many of them turn out to be thinly disguised attacks.
/r/MensRights21/01/15 01:09 PM
2

This is suicidal bullshit, the fall of western civilization, really. If the police is not allowed to do its work efficiently, it will do it badly. How enlightened!!! /s I'm a man and I freaking want the police to "profile men" because statistically it's men who commit more crime. Somehow I fail to see the contradiction between demanding my human rights be honored vs. accepting that the police should consider statistical facts when doing its work. Isn't it utterly absurd to demand that the police…
/r/MensRights21/01/15 10:00 AM
8

Not this shit again. 3 days can't pass without someone asking a stupid question like this without looking up all the previous topics. We want equal rights for everyone. This is an advocacy group for MEN, you know, men's rights... That we're advocating for men's rights does not mean we would take away the human rights of any other group. We don't feel the need to advocate for stuff other people already advocate for: blacks have the civil rights movement to turn to if they have a problem specific …
/r/MensRights21/01/15 09:51 AM
2

Are Male and Female Circumcision Morally Equivalent? Of course. Even asking the question is strange. Two babies lie before you, is mutilating one morally worse than mutilating the other? How the fuck could it be? Only if you deem one of them more valuable than the other. And this is exactly what a lot of people do: they think girls are more valuable than boys. That is the ONLY reason to differentiate between babies of the same age, same race, same anything except sex. And this is called sexism i…
/r/MensRights16/01/15 09:06 AM
1

So irrational fear in females is okay because it's based on an imaginary bogeyman only a small political group believes in? They can't even proprely define what objectification is.
/r/MensRights16/01/15 08:57 AM
1

These people are lunatics. There's no other way to put it.
/r/MensRights16/01/15 08:51 AM
6

Risking that I may sound a bit rude: Fuck them. Those entitled princesses are not my bosses, not my mothers, not my superiors in any way, shape or form. If they don't like what I'm doing with my life, tough luck. What do they bring to the table to make me want to change myself for them? Nothing. They are just demanding that men act and live how they want them to. Effin' megalomaniacs. The easiest and best answer to all their whining: sod off. What I do is none of your business. What now, the fis…
/r/MensRights16/01/15 08:44 AM
-1

I may never have the opportunity to prove my innocence, or to have my accusers prove the false charges, in any court of law. Their actions prove you're innocent, you don't need to prove it any further.
/r/MensRights16/01/15 08:33 AM
1

Came in to post the same quote, saw you already did that, upvoted.
/r/MensRights15/01/15 08:10 AM
2

The problem is not with the sample size, it's that this is total bullshit. The "researcher" (cough-cough) is a feminist, who does not present us the actual survey. She could (and I'm 100% sure she does) misrepresent what people have actually answered to the survey. It is beyond any kind of doubt that it was loaded with bullshit questions like "would you have sex with your long term partner if she had a couple of drinks?" ...well, yes. RAPIST!!! 31,7% of men would RAPE women!!!
/r/MensRights15/01/15 06:54 AM
6

This is fake as f_ck, like most feminist "experiments".
/r/MensRights13/01/15 10:47 AM
2

First of all 99% of our problems are not superficial bullshit like "boo hoo, i'm not allowed to cry". Who gives a fuck, I'll cry if I want to. Our problems are much more serious, like receiving longer sentences for the same crime. So this whinefest gravely misrepresents the MRM. Our problems are quite literraly worsened/enforced by feminism; the national organization of wilderbeasts and other feminist organizations fight tooth and nail to prevent men/fathers from getting equal rights with women/…
/r/MensRights12/01/15 03:04 PM
-1

Many praise this movie but I think it's overrated. Or, maybe, it's just 20 years too late. In our current climate nobody should be as stupid as the protagonist in the movie, passively drifting with the waves of bullshit meekly accepting it most of the times. The first rule of getting falsely accused is to immediately and vehemently deny, stand your ground, counterattack. The second rule is that if you can't win, bail. Leave the community of nitwits and find a new life somewhere else. In real lif…
/r/MensRights05/01/15 09:38 AM
2

The most important thing here is to realize the absolute need to counterattack. That is the only thing that could stem the tide of false accusations and SJW bullshit in general.
/r/MensRights04/01/15 01:08 PM
2

Since it's practically impossible to know the genetic father of a fetus in the womb, any pregnant woman can present written consent from any man at all. Who's to say that he isn't the father? In case the mother+father are married, well, I must say it's entirely reasonable to expect that the husband should have a say in his wife's potential abortion. I'm not saying this is a good proposal, these are just some stray thoughts about it.
/r/MensRights18/12/14 10:13 AM
1

Saying 'boys have issues too' to a feminist is like saying 'white people have issues too' to a black person... You're not wrong but missing the point. Well, duh... You're missing the point that twisted ideologues don't give a fuck about anybody else, they only care about their own victim group. Identity politics at its finest!
/r/MensRights10/12/14 11:45 AM
1

This is total bullshit. Surveys made by the police (not to be confused with reports of rape, which are much rarer) usually find that about 2% of women get raped overall. That's 1-in-50 in case you were wondering. This 1-in-5 bullshit is based on a feminist questionnaire with poorly defined questions and an ideologically driven evaluation. They ask questions like have you ever had sex while drunk? and if you answer yes they take it as a rape. Like I said, total bullshit. Never believe sensational…
/r/MensRights01/12/14 11:04 AM
12

Then why it only applies to male spaces? They seem to be perfectly fine with female spaces, in fact they create more every day. How's that for ekvalitee...
/r/MensRights01/12/14 10:56 AM
2

This is very important and should get more coverage than it gets. It deals with so much more than Sarkeesian or even Gamergate. One excerpt: Whenever feminist groups have partnered with social media organisations, their censorship targets have been critics of feminism and not abusers. Their overarching aim is to press for government regulation of the internet, perhaps even targeting anonymity itself. That's because anonymity is a place where cultural hegemony is challenged. With their media conn…
/r/MensRights28/11/14 11:11 AM
2

Upvoted for 'rebunk' :D Good find as well.
/r/MensRights26/11/14 09:34 AM
-2

Nope.
/r/MensRights24/11/14 08:31 AM
2

If any such law ever passes anywhere, all persons involved (from the lowliest SJW activists to the ministers, senators or whoever is responsible on the higher levels) must be reported to the police for rape immediately, and from then on every week, every month, every year. Let them fuckers realize what they're playing with.
/r/MensRights22/11/14 08:59 PM
1

LOL It has its amateurish charm :)
/r/MensRights21/11/14 07:55 AM
4

I misread the title "am I pretty?" and got confused for minute :) Am I overthinking this whole thing? Nope. If there's a difference, there's a reason. Separate showers cost more, so they only build those for people who matter. Who cares about the privacy of men?
/r/MensRights21/11/14 07:53 AM
5

Oh, so all the feminists criticizing Matt Taylor were also straws...? I see.
/r/MensRights19/11/14 10:29 AM
1

But this argument is itself racist/sexist, suggesting that something is okay for some races/sexes but not others. It's a form of hypocrisy.
/r/MensRights17/11/14 05:07 PM
2

It's clear as daylight. A woman wearing a skimpy dress is empowered (and must not be criticised because slut shaming), a guy wearing a shirt with a picture of that very same woman on it is "mysygyny". It would be hilarious if it wasn't so disgusting.
/r/MensRights17/11/14 12:26 PM
1

someone could be offended by the images on the shirt I bet these people would not be offended if some female scientist would give an interview dressed like one of the women on his shirt. That would be empowering, and criticizing her would be slut shaming! It's only a problem if men do something similar, like, wearing something with a woman depicted on it. Sexist bigots. On the same day the main attraction in the press was a Kardashian's ass. The hypocrisy is mindboggling. I've never been raped b…
/r/MensRights17/11/14 08:01 AM
1

Yeah, they'll soon find a woman for the position.
/r/MensRights16/11/14 05:56 PM
2

"Objectification" is a bullshit idea made up by feminists. Stop using their inane artificial terminology. Half the battle is already lost if you adopt their terms. He did not hurt anybody with the shirt, period. You can rest assured, this experience was at least as traumatizing for him as getting raped would be. He'd probably choose rape over this. So it's absolutely okay to compare the two. And saying that he deserved that trauma because of what he wore IS the argument feminists fight against a…
/r/MensRights16/11/14 05:53 PM
3

Yeah, it's really simple. If a female scientist would appear dressed like a babe on his shirt, we won't be allowed to criticise her in any way. How she dresses is her business, criticizing it is exercising patriarchal privileges, slut shaming, victim blaming and whatever. But god forbid a guy wears a shirt with empowered women on it...
/r/MensRights16/11/14 05:41 PM
2

I would totally agree with you if black-on-white crime wasn't already a huge problem swept under the rug, with people recognizing it demonized and undermined for supposedly being racists. I know this is MR and we MRAs don't much care for skin color in general, it just bugs me that we whites must pretend under all circumstances that racist hate crimes against us are invisible, non-existent, or 'not a serious issue'. This artificial stance just makes the criminals go even bolder.
/r/MensRights11/11/14 08:20 AM
3

This makes me wonder if 3 white women attacked a black man would people automatically assume that race had nothing to do with it...
/r/MensRights11/11/14 07:41 AM
7

I wonder if IGF would say the same in a reversed situation. How about a male judge (possibly a gamergater) tweeting he won't nominate any game with women in it? Diversity of opinions and innocent jokes, right? I'm sure feminists wouldn't gather with pitchforks at all, they have a fantastic sense of humor.
/r/MensRights11/11/14 07:19 AM
13

If things happened as described in the article then it was rape. The only problem here is naming the guy before he is proven guilty.
/r/MensRights11/11/14 07:13 AM
3

This is not 'news', this is outrage. With the genders reversed the man would receive 10+ years for the same crime. Hurray for equality!
/r/MensRights11/11/14 07:10 AM
2

Are we allowed to notice that this was yet another black-on-white assault or is that racist?
/r/MensRights11/11/14 06:59 AM
1

You can't know how many assaults don't get reported to the authorities. It is impossible to know except if you're God. So anyone implying to know how many assaults go unreported is a hack spreading unmitigated bullshit. On a side note, if it is true that for every reported sexual assault about 60 goes unreported then women are fucking idiots. (it's 1 in 60 assuming that half of the police reports are false, which is a good approximation)
/r/MensRights10/11/14 08:04 AM
1

Since I doesn't give a hoot about twitter, could you sum up what this is all about?
/r/MensRights10/11/14 07:54 AM
-4

We must bring back social shaming because some women can't be expected to control themselves. These are attention whores, posting these pictures just to brag about how men can't control themselves around them special snowflakes. This effin' lunacy will not stop, it will never stop until people start calling out these attention whores for what they are. They are hyperactive children with an insatiable taste for attention and society has the responsibility to make them grow into adults. The hyster…
/r/MensRights10/11/14 07:49 AM
1

girls for gender equity, rotfl more like pocket fascists
/r/MensRights10/11/14 07:40 AM
1

I pity these poor souls, so full of envy and hatred. They must destroy what other people enjoy because they themselves can't enjoy it.
/r/MensRights06/11/14 04:28 PM
3

women own about a million employer firms (...) Men own about 3 million employer businesses and add over $8 trillion dollars to the U.S. economy each year. Women-owned businesses contribute just over a trillion dollars. So basically there are 3 times as many male-owned businesses, creating 8 times the profit. It means that male-owned businesses are 2.5 times as profitable on average.
/r/MensRights03/11/14 08:24 AM
3

You can really know a gender gap report is unbiased when they say that the sex ratio at birth (which is in natural circumstances 106 boys for 100 girls) is a metric of oppression. Also, the WEF CEO said that the life expectancy gap in the US is only 3 years for woman and this hurts their ranking because it should be at least 6 years like in other developed countries. When feminists say they only want "equality" they think about their own specific version of it, which has nothing to do with actua…
/r/MensRights01/11/14 09:36 AM
2

Are you mad? Why would men deserve a day off to care for a sick child or parent??? /s
/r/MensRights01/11/14 09:21 AM
2

How can she write about the "need" to attack masculinity? Doesn't she know that feminists only want equality? /s
/r/MensRights31/10/14 10:34 AM
1

It's a well written article with good arguments (apart from the bullshit about how women were oppressed in the past). Thanks for the link!
/r/MensRights31/10/14 10:07 AM
6

This... This is something new. I'm not surprised by many things after ~10 years of being an MRA but this got me with my pants down. Fucking hell. There is literally nothing these beings of pure hate would not destroy, desecrate or warp for their own sick purposes.
/r/MensRights31/10/14 07:45 AM
6

Western society does hold people responsible for having sex intoxicated, but only the male ones. That's because our societies deem women (and everything related to them, like their sexuality, their word, their morals, etc.) more valuable than men (and things related to men). This leads to a mentality where these pure, innocent angels must be protected from those subhuman brutes at all times and at all costs. This in turn means that when a man and a woman do something together, she's never respon…
/r/MensRights29/10/14 11:09 AM
1

Thank you, kind sir :)
/r/MensRights29/10/14 11:03 AM
77

Because 90% of people are so dumb they don't understand the distinction between women (half of the population) and feminism (a small but powerful political group). Most people are fuckwits and can be manipulated laughably easily, so when you criticise feminism their guts tell them you attack women.
/r/MensRights29/10/14 10:47 AM
-3

You know what, this isn't racism. Most catcalling does come from blacks. Just look at the stupid video on the front page for crying out loud. Stop being so fucking politically correct that you deny simple reality. Orwell would congratulate you on being such a swell statist fellow if he'd be alive now.
/r/MensRights29/10/14 10:44 AM
1

Referring to homelessness, suicides, or any other similar stat would be a lot better. They have the same punch without the drawback of referring to the fact that men are committing more crimes than women. When you start talking about how there are more men in prison than women, 99% of people will immediately think about how this is caused by their own aggression, which is not something you want them to think about. But hey, let's fuck strategic thinking and common sense, just downvote me already…
/r/MensRights28/10/14 10:27 PM
0

Oooookay, but then your reply to my original comment is practically meaningless. It seems like you wanted to refute what I said but you didn't. Or you thought that I didn't know about the pussy pass? Well, brother, you're preaching to the choir here.
/r/MensRights28/10/14 01:15 PM
1

People talking about statutory rape usually forget that the age of consent is an arbitrary number defined by some people in politics who have no qualifications for such decisions. What you so vehemently defend as "rape" is considered totally legal in most countries of the world. What we need here is not fanaticism and sensationalism but a little common sense. Statutory rape laws should be reconsidered to avoid punishing people for consensual sex with someone who is biologically an adult. And thi…
/r/MensRights28/10/14 01:07 PM
0

Which does not account for all the difference... Men do commit more crimes. You can try to argue against common sense but you shouldn't.
/r/MensRights28/10/14 12:54 PM
-1

Incarceration is not a good example here because in most of the cases people do something to "earn it". It can easily backfire if feminists answer that it only proves that men have more criminal tendencies. Use a different stat, there are hundreds out there.
/r/MensRights28/10/14 07:38 AM
-1

This is patently ludicrous. This PC shit has gotten to your brains. What I'm talking about is there are millions of people out there not knowing what we (the MRM) stand for, and if one of the first things they learn about us is that we're advocating for men wearing dresses they'll immediately write us off as a bunch of whining homosexuals. That is not very good for our already abysmal PR to say the least. But of course recognizing this would take a bit of common sense, something which western pe…
/r/MensRights23/10/14 10:11 AM
-2

TIL don't advocate for wearing dresses = shut up and slave away. Also, you missed the "in the eyes of the general public" part. Imagine standing in front of your collegues or classmates lecturing them about how men should be able to wear dresses. You'd be relentlessly mocked for the rest of your life. I wouldn't even care about you making an ass of yourself but you represent our movement. I don't blame you guys, you were raised in a PC culture where common sense is illegal.
/r/MensRights22/10/14 06:11 PM
56

When women do it, it's romance tourism But of course... When women fuck strangers it's called romance. It's only men whose sexual desires are animalistic. /s
/r/MensRights22/10/14 09:07 AM
-5

Is this even something worth fighting for? Fuck no. The last thing we'd want is to feminize ourselves. Also, the fastest way to completely discredit ourselves in the eyes of the general public is to appear to be a bunch of pussies whining that social pressures prevent us from wearing women's clothing. Come on, peeps.
/r/MensRights22/10/14 09:06 AM
1

It's different because she's a damsel woman, dummy... /s
/r/MensRights21/10/14 08:17 AM
1

Again with the shaming language... Come on, you can do better than that. I'm not arguing about you or me, I'm arguing about pedo-hysteria. Viewing a picture found on the net is a victimless crime.
/r/MensRights19/10/14 12:48 PM
1

I think the person you are responding to is saying that it WOULD minimize the harm caused by sexual predators. Obviously. One good solution would be for the gov't to allow porn companies to create fake child porn. That would kill two birds with one stone (lowering demand for real c.p. and satisfying the needs of the viewers), also creating some taxable profits in the process, which is an added bonus.
/r/MensRights18/10/14 07:04 AM
1

Once you calm down Starting with shaming language is always a good tactic :) why there was a blanket approval of the kind of child porn What the holy heavens are you talking about??? Blanket approval of child porn? I've never seen such a thing in my life. (Admittedly I don't visit pedofile circles much, but still.) The argument is this: if you have sex with a child, you go to prison. If you film it, you go to prison for even longer. But if you just browse the net and happen to find something tha…
/r/MensRights18/10/14 06:57 AM
2

You got it bass ackwards. Porn is an emergency valve for many people. There are statistics about many countries showing that when porn was made legal rape decreased significantly. The same is true for child porn - if sick people can 'solve their problems' in their own homes looking at computer screens, it's much better than them wandering the streets with suppressed urges. The puritans are only making things worse.
/r/MensRights17/10/14 06:23 AM
1

I'm not just advocating for sanity because feminists are insane. When the US has more people in prison per capita than any other country in the world thinking about loosening some unnecessarily harsh laws is anything but "backlash".
/r/MensRights17/10/14 06:17 AM
1

Are you saying child porn is a victimless crime? Nope. It's effin' ridiculous to equate looking at pictures (which might be fake, drawn, etc.) with violently raping a child. Your over the top, fanaticized mentality is the exact problem we're talking about. That people hear the word "child" and they completely lose their shit, and more importantly, they lose their capability to think straight.
/r/MensRights17/10/14 06:14 AM
2

That's a tricky question if you don't know much about the lives of men in Pakistan or SA. The media is always eager to talk about the suffering of women, but never talks about the suffering of men. A woman stoned to death? A tragedy. A woman attacked with acid? Horrifying. What the press does not talk about is that 40% of acid attack victims and the majority of people stoned are men. So, how can you compare the situation of men and women in the middle east if you don't know anything about the me…
/r/MensRights16/10/14 02:33 PM
-2

And he's damn right. There are 2.2+ millions of people in jail in the US, many for victimless crimes, which is absurd.
/r/MensRights16/10/14 10:40 AM
2

When their "different rights" are clearly completely inferior to the rights of men They weren't. Tell me again, exactly how much do you know about the laws of the 17-19th centuries? All you think you 'know' are feminist soundbites. If you think it's not second-class-citizen status when you can't vote, can't get any good jobs, are restricted from many things, when you get married all of your property legally belongs completely to your spouse and not to you any more, etc... well you're just wrong.…
/r/MensRights16/10/14 10:26 AM
2

You take things out of context and blow them out of proportion. 90% of people think (thanks to the indoctrination coming from schools and the media) that women had less rights than men. This is not the case. Women had different rights; in some areas they had advantages over men, in other areas they had disadvatages. Talking only about their disadvantages is dishonest to say the least.
/r/MensRights16/10/14 08:01 AM
1

MundaneMatt and Sargon of Akkad
/r/MensRights16/10/14 07:57 AM
2

Why do feminists think men are safe outside?!? Because they are ignorant bigots stuck in misandrist propaganda. Ideologues never care about reality.
/r/MensRights14/10/14 06:07 AM
2

Thank you!
/r/MensRights13/10/14 08:10 AM
1

Our friend Chapin addressed this in one of his videos.
/r/MensRights13/10/14 06:30 AM
2

I could have helped diffuse the situation by just leaving so she would be more comfortable The last thing you should ever do is make fascist pieces of shit like her comfortable.
/r/MensRights12/10/14 04:04 PM
1

yet retain the capacity to make sensible decisions If you make decisions that are not sensible those are still your decisions, ie. your fault. It cuts both ways: if a woman willingly has sex while drunk that's not rape either, regardless of if it was "sensible" from her or not. helping him to determine if it was rape or not Since legalities are out of the picture the only thing that actually matters is his experience. Did he suffer through something that could be called rape? Was he traumatized?…
/r/MensRights10/10/14 06:38 AM
-1

Not remembering stuff does not equal being incapacitated. As I said, it is perfectly possible that OP initiated or accepted the sexual encounter, he just didn't remember it the next day. How on earth would it be justifiable to punish someone based on OP not remembering what happened??????? If OP had at least a witness or something proving it was rape, then the situation would be different, but this seems to be a classic he said - she said scenario where nothing could be proven or disproven. The …
/r/MensRights09/10/14 09:19 AM
-1

My point still stands, "moron". What's the point of looking for victimhood if he's not traumatized at all and can't remember anything? As far as he knows it might be him who initiated the sex. Accusing someone of rape shouldn't be taken lightly, and do I really have to spell this out in the MR sub? Just because this time it's a guy we shouldn't switch our stance on rape accusations completely. Have some integrity, fellas.
/r/MensRights09/10/14 08:35 AM
-6

If you're "not really sure", then you weren't raped. Have some common sense for fuck's sake and don't buy into the feminist rape hysteria.
/r/MensRights09/10/14 07:43 AM
6

This is pathetic.
/r/MensRights09/10/14 07:01 AM
1

I'm very sceptical when I see a radical feminist ideologue talking about what someone "thinks". Unless she's a mind reader she should shut the eff up and let Camilla Paglia herself describe what she thinks.
/r/MensRights06/10/14 07:44 AM
8

You are arguing with an imaginary opponent. I've never said prostitution for women is a "godsend" or a "blessing", I said women have this extra option while men don't. If a woman doesn't want to choose this option it's her business. And who said anything about forcing anyone into anything or suffering without complaints? You came up with this stuff and try to argue like it was my point. You have a vivid imagination. All that aside, if I was a homeless woman without a job, I probably would choose…
/r/MensRights05/10/14 05:47 PM
7

Please show me where I have said that.
/r/MensRights05/10/14 04:47 PM
2

Klu Klux Klan social justice warrior Those two are both hate groups, your simile is flawed :) But your argument is right.
/r/MensRights05/10/14 08:35 AM
2

Feminism is supposed to be about working to end injustices that women face. Supposed, yes. But it isn't.
/r/MensRights05/10/14 08:31 AM
7

Feminist extremists ARE the mainstream. I can't fathom for the life of me why "pretty flower feminists" and "dictionary feminists" fail to realize that Hillary, Gillard, Harman, Marcotte, Valenti and co. (ie. the influential, mainstream feminists) are as radical as they get. They demonize men left and right, they keep spewing lies debunked hundreds of times, they advocate for ever more privileges for women, etc. Have you seen a non-radical feminist in the media lately? The only one who comes to …
/r/MensRights05/10/14 08:27 AM
3

Feminism is a rubber concept, it can mean anything and it's exact opposite. Let me guess, you believe in the dictionary definition, right? Cool, that covers about 1% of the actual activity of feminists. Can you define a movement by what 1% of its members do, sweeping the other 99% under the rug? Well...
/r/MensRights05/10/14 08:20 AM
1

Considerng how women have lower joblessness rate in the US than men, I seriously doubt that it's them who are discriminated against.
/r/MensRights05/10/14 08:13 AM
14

Men and women have different sets of privileges and face different kinds of discrimination. Okay, but it in no way implies that men have it better or oppress women. It is positively retarded to say that women are oppressed by the privileges society grants them, but this is exactly what feminists say. In fact they say that both male and female privileges and disprivileges are there to help men and oppress women, which is a sexist piece of garbage. And then there's the disprivileged side of things…
/r/MensRights05/10/14 08:02 AM
1

It feels like when Thungerf00t got his twitter acc banned by Sarkeesian he got scared and started looking for a way to appear more impartial. He had to attack someone from the other side... Sad.
/r/MensRights04/10/14 06:24 AM
1

Look, for the love of god, I'm not talking about an urban legend that gardasil is killing people left and right. I linked to an article from a reputable source, inteviewing Dr. Diane Harper, who was a lead researcher responsible for the testing of gardasil, employed by the firm that created the drug (Merck). You can't sweep this under the rug with a link to snopes just because you think everybody who is capable of critical thinking is a vaxxer moron. "Here ya go" my pompous ass.
/r/MensRights03/10/14 04:43 PM
3

I wonder why you say that, considering how it has nothing to do with the topic at hand. You just want to derail this men's rights debate into a "vaxxer" one for no particular reason, it seems. For you people are either completely for all vaccines ever, or against every vaccine ever, meaning one camp is a band of geniuses and the other is a collection of fuckwits. This is a very limited viewpoint, to say the least, and it says a lot about you that you try to enforce this 2-bit childish bullshit o…
/r/MensRights03/10/14 10:59 AM
0

You sound like a conspiracy nutjob. Suuuuuuuuuuuuure.
/r/MensRights03/10/14 10:26 AM
1

you said it was useless yet half the EU is doing it ... therefore you are wrong It does not work that way :) Truth is not determined by number of followers. Read what actual scientists say about the topic, eg. the article I linked above. EU countries can do it for a number of reasons, chief amongst them being the pharmaceutical lobby. You will say that's a conspiracy theory and you might be right - why would a company spend a couple of millions on lobbying to receive billions in profits, that wo…
/r/MensRights03/10/14 09:34 AM
3

...your point being? If other countries do it then it must be good? HPV vaccination should be strictly voluntary, and people who want it should pay for it either from their own pockets or through their health insurances. It is idiotic to start another chapter in the gender wars just to make sure the pharmaceutical industry has its profits for something that offers more risks than benefits - admitted by the lead researcher who was responsible for testing it.
/r/MensRights03/10/14 09:09 AM
4

Read the fucking link for fuck's sake, it's about a researcher of gardrasil on CBS News. Bigoted idiot...
/r/MensRights03/10/14 07:21 AM
2

...and all the other sites siding with Gamasutra should lose revenue as well, for example this Verge clusterfuck. Let's continue the campaign!
/r/MensRights03/10/14 06:57 AM
4

For fuck's sake, and for the n+1<sup>th</sup> time, men should not join in on the female/feminist hysteria. We don't need the government to spend even more of our tax dollars on vaccines that are practically useless. What we need even less is voices demanding it be made compulsory for everyone.
/r/MensRights03/10/14 06:44 AM
0

The most chilling point of the article is this: To generate character development, you absolutely have to harm the character, and conflict is the most common method of doing such. With a female character, since you’re not allowed to harm them, you can’t make them grow or better themselves in the vast majority of situations. This is not only true in fiction, but also in real life. By shielding women from harm, we essentially make sure they never have to develop their character. That is why wester…
/r/MensRights29/09/14 11:03 AM
8

Yep. All they do is throw temper tantrums like children, demanding that men do their bidding. You say you want more female CEOs? Why don't you start a business then? Because that would involve actual work and taking risks. And you don't know how to start anything with your shitty gender studies degree. Better pester men instead, demanding quotas! They should give away their positions freely, the oppressing bastards...
/r/MensRights29/09/14 06:50 AM
2

6oodfella is one of the best youtube antifeminists. Always worth watching.
/r/MensRights28/09/14 09:11 AM
0

This would deserve a million upvotes. The definition of feminism is... This picture.
/r/MensRights23/09/14 11:48 AM
1

"Women and children first" is not a chivalrous policy invented by some social engineers in the late 1800's, it's rooted in the male instinct to please women (to gain sex) and to ensure the survival of the tribe (by protecting women of child bearing age, and of course the offspring). But since we're talking about the prehistoric era, there is no evidence about anything. You can use your own better judgement to understand the evolutionary psychology at work, or you can deny it altogether. If you w…
/r/MensRights15/09/14 12:47 PM
3

This article is just a bunch of hyperbolic nonsense with out any facts, information, or even logical arguments of any kind. Erhm, nope. It's above soundbite level thinking, like our friend Chapin used to say. Jim Goad is not writing about the actual case and how many cocks Zoe sucked, but the principles in the background, requiring a deeper level of understanding. That this is an ideological war spreading everywhere. If you want specific details on the case there are tons of websites having that…
/r/MensRights15/09/14 11:14 AM
2

These SJWs—the dominant women and their meek, dutiful manservants—are trying to bust up “dude culture” even if practiced alone and in mom’s basement. And I think this is why the backlash is so severe. Trying to take their joysticks away is a deeply symbolic form of castration. Profound.
/r/MensRights15/09/14 11:08 AM
0

The basic problem is that people think the left is an authentic political platform for people who care about social issues (the poor, minorities, etc.). This is how it should be, yes, but sadly it's not the case. It's not the first time in history (and not the last either) where some influential people use others as cannon fodder and as useful idiots while hiding their true intentions. I won't babble on about intricate conspiracy theories and whatnot, I just want to give a few pointers. You can …
/r/MensRights12/09/14 11:08 AM
1

No, the funny thing is you know nothing about the actual birth of "the left" as you understand it today, you just assume it's sincere about its origins, aims, etc. Do you know Gramsci's work? Do you understand the motives of social engineers? No, you just leave lame remarks on other people's comments about things you have superficial knowledge about at best.
/r/MensRights12/09/14 07:16 AM
2

You can't engage people like that on an intellectual level. If they can't hurt you (complain to your boss, doxx you, etc.) make fun of them - if they have the means to hurt you, you should possess the f_cking common sense to not talk to them about anything, ever. Just let them rot in their own hatred.
/r/MensRights09/09/14 12:07 PM
1

Meta: I'm not sure stickying these posts is a good idea because the green text makes them less visible. I mean people got used to articles being at the top for weeks, and don't even look at the green stuff any more. Maybe we should use these stickies more sparingly, with a couple of days passing between them.
/r/MensRights09/09/14 07:16 AM
0

If the left is truly about "equality," then it's about time we acknowledge that feminism has failed. The left was never about equality, it's a machine designed to tear down civilization. Marx wanted to destroy the western world and build a utopia on its ruins, and all his followers (including feminists and the latest iteration, neoliberalists) are working towards that aim (most of them unknowingly). They think they are building the utopia, and they don't understand that the first step is the com…
/r/MensRights08/09/14 07:44 AM
0

Your post is better than the original article. It didn't age well to be honest.
/r/MensRights08/09/14 07:07 AM
2

The said truth is 90% of people are drones programmed by their education and the media. You can't do anything about them, their brains do not function properly. They just compare anything new to what is already in there, and in case there's a difference they reject the new stuff automatically. It doesn't even scratch the surface of their suppressed, slumbering consciousness. If you insist you're right they will get emotionally charged (paging cognitive dissonance) and will attack you. So, I woul…
/r/MensRights07/09/14 07:31 AM
1

what did she lie about? The little drama about "he threw my baby"? Yeah, I assumed she told her story to the police and/or the press. I'd think the police does not make stuff up out of thin air, like "he threw my baby" and such, so someone had to tell them it happened, and the most likely culprit is the mother.
/r/MensRights04/09/14 05:43 PM
1

Meh. The link between MR and a gay guy getting a football contract is very weak at best. He should be hired based on his actual skills, and nobody should care the least about where he likes to put his dick. In fact most people never did care, it's only the liberal media which makes a giant fuss about it. And there is a suspicion that he's just not that good and this 'coming out' was a ploy to land a contract more easily with the help of the PC liberal crowd. I agree with Chapin on this one.
/r/MensRights04/09/14 09:43 AM
1

TRP has nothing to do with the MRM. The only connection is that some people sympathize with both, which is like saying that some people who play golf also like spaghetti, so spaghetti is a giant tumor on golfers' struggle. Feminists intentionally muddy the waters by mixing up the two, but nobody has to pretend it's a legitimate claim.
/r/MensRights04/09/14 09:35 AM
1

TIL "unbiased" means taking at face value everything that a proven liar says.
/r/MensRights04/09/14 09:15 AM
2

what would she be charged with, panicking? Putting your 8 month old child under the wheels of a car is not something that should just be overlooked no matter how angry you were at the time. She was not "panicking", she wanted to fight the man who apparently just wanted to go away. She could have left with her children at any time. Also, her story to the police (and to the press) contained numerous lies. Don't take her words at face value for fuck's sake.
/r/MensRights04/09/14 09:14 AM
1

Regardless of who he is we must uphold the truth for fuck's sake. It's not a question of is he sympathetic or is he a nice guy, we can't let the media lie about him freely. threw an 8-month-old girl out of a moving car before running the child over in a horrific attack None of this is actually true.
/r/MensRights04/09/14 09:06 AM
1

It is incredible how the press reframed what has happened. Don't they realize that people can watch the video and see how things went down??? Unbelievable.
/r/MensRights04/09/14 09:03 AM
2

It's mighty fine then, thank you for the update :)
/r/MensRights02/09/14 06:36 AM
1

Disgusting. Unbelievable.
/r/MensRights02/09/14 05:53 AM
1

I don't want to sound dismissive but I think it would make more sense to look for an already-established gaming site that is resistant to SJW bullshit and promote that. Starting something from scratch is a huge endeavor, destined to fail 95% of the time.
/r/MensRights02/09/14 05:51 AM
1

I don't quite get what you're hinting at, to be honest. A penis (just like a female breast) is "sexual" by its nature, regardless of what you use it for at the moment or who touches it. A public indecency charge for peeing in public is the consequence of showing your penis, not the fact that you're urinating. There are numerous laws presupposing that some of our body parts have an innate sexual quality to them. These cannot be given or taken by others, the patriarchy, or whatever.
/r/MensRights01/09/14 05:58 AM
1

Should you be charged with public indecency every time you go pee in a public washroom? Your are charged if you pee in public, regardless of it not being a sexual act. The washroom in this example is the equivalent of a breast feeding room.
/r/MensRights31/08/14 05:44 AM
2

The MRM, for one...
/r/MensRights29/08/14 02:47 PM
1

Thoughts, anyone? Don't use tainted sources. Don't give them your money or support in any way, shape or form.
/r/MensRights29/08/14 10:04 AM
1

Nope. What I say is there for everyone to see, you don't have to use strawmen to discuss it. There is assault and there is sexual assault. Sexual assault does not need to be actually sexual in nature, like you described it ("rub them for their own sexual gratification"), it's sexual assault even if a stranger just calmly and peacefully puts his hand on a woman's ass without her permission. That implies that her ass has a sexual quality to it. And it seems you didn't read the ps. Please do so.
/r/MensRights29/08/14 09:45 AM
1

OP forgot to mention that this blogpost has the length of an average book.
/r/MensRights29/08/14 09:29 AM
3

The article is spot on.
/r/MensRights29/08/14 09:23 AM
3

misguided feminists The only other kind are the ones profiting from it and doing the same thing with intentional malice and greed. If a "real" feminist existed anywhere s/he would have to strictly oppose the entirety of the current implementation of feminism from top to bottom, including lies spewed by Clinton, Valenti, Marcotte, Gillard, Harman, etc, etc, down to the noname asshats quoted in the BBC article OP linked. There are no good feminists, only fools and horses manipulators. If you actua…
/r/MensRights29/08/14 07:45 AM
2

Rape prevention nail polish sounds like a great idea but I'm not sure how you're going to get men to wear it A burglary prevention door lock sounds like a great idea but I'm not sure how you're going to get blacks to wear it A bank account protecting software sounds like a great idea but I'm not sure how you're going to get jews to install it HashtagDumbfuck
/r/MensRights29/08/14 07:28 AM
1

Ah, I see it's a link to a true scotsman. /joke
/r/MensRights26/08/14 06:31 AM
1

In my first comment up there the word "harassment" is a link, in case you didn't notice.
/r/MensRights20/08/14 07:45 AM
1

I have linked a lot better dictionary than wikipedia for eff's sake.
/r/MensRights19/08/14 03:00 PM
1

Whoa, the first article from this guy I can agree with. Women even think they’re entitled to sex. You just don’t notice it most of the time because they don’t want to have sex with most men, but they quickly get violent when a man they want refuses to have sex with them. As you can see from that link, women also feel entitled to use violence against men while denouncing “violence against women”. Spot on.
/r/MensRights19/08/14 07:55 AM
0

that doesn't make it right for men to harass women Catcalling is not harassment. It might be annoying to some women but the legal definition of harassment is not "anything that annoys a woman". At least not yet, but leave it to feminists...
/r/MensRights19/08/14 07:42 AM
9

The n+1<sup>th</sup> piece of evidence that women are generally sexists while men aren't.
/r/MensRights19/08/14 06:49 AM
1

I think that some of the embarrassment and shame came from the fact that so much negative attention is called to catcalling nowadays. If it was accepted as a stupid/impolite/lowbrow but harmless form of signaling attraction most women would get over it fairly quickly. It's a form of social pressure: if you see that other women take offense at it you are more likely to find it insulting as well, but if you see that almost everybody handles it gracefully (with a smile even, the horror!) you will f…
/r/MensRights18/08/14 06:49 PM
1

You are spot on. If anything, feminists want to eradicate some of men's human rights, creating ever more inequality favoring women - like giving women the right to criminalize men they don't find attractive. Two guys walk up to the same woman saying the same thing; one is charming, the other is a harasser, based on nothing more than the arbitrary opinion of the woman in question. The erosion of due process for men in family courts and sexual assault cases is even worse. You have the right to a f…
/r/MensRights18/08/14 12:14 PM
0

In light of my own upbringing, I find it a little pathetic how the modern feminists go on about cat calling as if a man's voice or words or whistles are dangerous weapons. Well, yeah. If you are seriously traumatized by someone whistling at you, you are not fit to exist in a human society. It is utter lunacy to think you can/should restructure the entirety of human civilization to make it cater to your irrational fears.
/r/MensRights18/08/14 11:57 AM
1

It is a basic human right for every living human being to look upon others and to initiate conversation with them. Some people do it impolitely, but it is still their basic human right nonetheless. You can't criminalize impoliteness, but you can reject the conversation the impolite person is trying to have. This is how human society worked from the dawn of time and it is how it should work. All the feminist claptrap about catcalls boil down to them wanting ever more privileges for women: to over…
/r/MensRights18/08/14 11:49 AM
1

He compared christianty to feminism, but they aren't similar in the way he implied they are. Christians do not "claim helplessness". On the contrary, Christianty teaches its followers to help the helpless. Feminism is much like socialism, except that it paints women as being incapable of being responsible for themselves instead of the masses. It's like Christianity in that it tries to claim helplessness and victim hood as a badge of pride.
/r/MensRights18/08/14 09:54 AM
1

There's a huge difference between "you should fake powerlessness and claim victimhood to steal what others have" and "be humble".
/r/MensRights18/08/14 08:27 AM
6

Fuckin' idiots in that sub, thoroughly brainwashed by feminist profs. It matters not one bit that some women had dangerous jobs - yeah, they did, so what? That doesn't invalidate the comment in question. It's undeniable that men do 95% of dangerous jobs. We do it now and we've been doing it since the dawn of history. Historically speaking, women only work in dangerous jobs as a last resort - when there are no disposable males around or the economic conditions make it absolutely necessary. I bet …
/r/MensRights17/08/14 07:47 PM
4

Spot on with Rand and socialism but you seem to misunderstand Christianity. It preaches "help the poor", not "play the victim card to grab power".
/r/MensRights17/08/14 06:46 PM
-2

Sure, whites give blacks billions of tax dollars each year. I'm sure that's what you meant. Eff you for playing into the divide and conquer strategy the elite uses to distract us while they build their little police state. The blacks (and women, LGBT people, etc) have been systematically agitated to hate whites (males, heteros) for at least 50 years now. I'm sure we need even more of the same shit, that will calm everybody down and the situation will be resolved promptly.
/r/MensRights14/08/14 09:23 AM
0

I’m a hardcore, dyed-in-the-wool liberal, especially on social issues. Oh, well, fuck you then. You are part of the problem - don't cry if your discriminatory practices come around to bite you in the ass. You have worked hard to undermine your fellow men, now it's time to wake the fuck up and admit you were a misguided asshat.
/r/MensRights14/08/14 09:06 AM
2

I'd like this article A LOT more if it weren't of the white guilt variety. Why can't someone analyze the situation of black folks without blaming whitey? Why is it whites' fault that a lot of black men lost their jobs in the recession??? Whites lost a lot of jobs too, there was no racism involved.
/r/MensRights14/08/14 08:44 AM
1

Nr. 4 is weak, I wouldn't call it a right per se, but the others are spot on.
/r/MensRights14/08/14 08:29 AM
2

Standard postmodern bullshit, cultural marxist newspeak, meaningless sophistry designed to derail rational discourse, a piece of identity-politics propaganda. So, in short: fuckin' lunacy.
/r/MensRights13/08/14 10:30 AM
5

"reward a criminal act with money from the victim" This is victim blaming, not when someone says drunk women shouldn't go to dangerous alleys alone at night.
/r/MensRights06/08/14 09:22 AM
2

Fantastic find, thank you for sharing.
/r/MensRights06/08/14 09:19 AM
0

who exactly is coming to you with all these stories of being groped? I see it only from feminists, like in this video from 6oodfella. This is another reason why I think it's bullshit: it's almost exclusively feminists who say they are abused all the time. People, if you live in a place where sexual assault on the streets is actually common, pack your things and leave right now. There are places on earth where people have some remnants of common decency...
/r/MensRights05/08/14 03:39 PM
14

You are one of the most privileged people on Earth, and you dare to complain that some men don't know their place Nothing screams 'equality' more than women thinking they're so much above men that men don't have a right to look upon or to talk to them. It was the privilege of kings to take offense at being talked to.
/r/MensRights05/08/14 07:34 AM
13

Some masturbate, and grope. I can't even imagine where you people live. I'm close to 40 now but I have never seen a guy masturbating or groping a woman in public. I firmly believe that ~90% of street harrassment stories are made up bullshit, it's simply a form of boasting for the 'victims'. See, I'm sooooo gorgeous men can't control themselves around me. Funny part is, this is (like everything else regarding status) an arms race for women, so they constantly one-up each other with ever more unbe…
/r/MensRights05/08/14 07:18 AM
6

You can't alienate people who won't support the movement as it is. And what could you do? You can't cut important issues just to cater to the sensibilities of overly emotional people. Genital mutilation of boys is an MR issue, period. If you decide you can't support the MRM because you are already circumsized, well, don't let the door hit your ass on your way out.
/r/MensRights04/08/14 07:22 AM
6

His body, his choice. Seriously though, genital mutilation of infants is a human rights issue. If your personal emotions prevent you from seeing that then you have a bit of soul searching ahead of you.
/r/MensRights04/08/14 06:48 AM
2

Feminists won't rest until they devour everything. You'd think that if you cut a compromise with them they will consider that a win and settle down a bit, but no - they use every inch they gain to build more trenches and attack further territory. Theirs is a totalitarian war for complete control.
/r/MensRights04/08/14 06:38 AM
4

This paranoia is counterproductive and stupid. Let's undermine our biggest allies, why not? I'm sure they only want to harm us in a mysterious, devious way. That Judgybitch gal just wants to enslave us all, amiright? What we need in the MRM is a bit more infighting based on naked paranoia... /s
/r/MensRights04/08/14 06:27 AM
3

No matter which way you cut it feminism is against men, and it inevitably comes out in the long term. You simply can't believe that men oppress women and at the same time have no dislike for men in general. From their perspective it would be like a jew living in a (comfortable) concentration camp but still not hating the nazis. Theoretically possible, practically not so much.
/r/MensRights01/08/14 10:04 AM
0

"Gendering", for fuck's sake... Can we stop with this bullshit? Men is not a gender but a sex. Or did the israeli soldiers ask palestinian people how they identify sexually before shooting/bombing them? Also, war is war, people are killed, what is the use of counting the sexes separately? Is it less gruesome if more men (or women) are killed? Is a massacre more justified if more men (or women) are killed?
/r/MensRights01/08/14 07:40 AM
2

Cultural marxism is not an economic theory. Read about Gramsci's march through the institutions. (The phrase was not coined by him but the idea is credited to him.) The distinction you make is far from decisive. At best you could say that feminism is a slightly more radical form of marxist theory, with men/women substituted for rich/poor.
/r/MensRights01/08/14 07:28 AM
5

I see nothing wrong with consenting adults engaging in something like this. It's a private enterprise, it does not oppress or exploit anybody. The problem is with people against this type of thing when the "servants" are women.
/r/MensRights30/07/14 06:57 PM
2

Absolutely unbelievable. I don't use the word 'literally' often but I literally can't make any sense of this. It's not jumping the shark, it's jumping the shark while juggling black holes and inverting universes. So, our friend Stephen wrote this: What I’ve tried to employ the female members of my family is that ... let’s make sure we don’t do anything to provoke wrong actions, because if we come after somebody has put their hands on you, it doesn’t negate the fact that they already put their ha…
/r/MensRights30/07/14 07:48 AM
2

This is not 'news', this is outrage. Bulldozing a soldier's home while he's in combat, fuckin' god...
/r/MensRights30/07/14 06:59 AM
73

Who's really behind #WomenAgainstFeminism? Their message sounds a lot like men Logical reasoning and forming your own opinion sound like things only men would do? Well, isn't that condescending to women?
/r/MensRights30/07/14 06:57 AM
1

I see it as a reaction to the less than cordial reception that feminism has given the MRM. Nope. The MRM was antifeminist from the get-go, because many of the modern men's problems are directly and intentionally caused by feminism. The MRM is a resistance movement against feminism, basically, even if some liberal leaning people try to ignore/hide this fact. But there's nothing wrong with going against feminism, it's the hate movement of our age (like the KKK was in fashion a 100 years ago). Let'…
/r/MensRights27/07/14 07:21 AM
8

We don't care about people's sexual orientation at all. I know it's an unbelievable concept in this day and age... Where you put your dick is none of our business, and it has exactly fuckall to do with the problems men face in general in our societies. If you have a problem because you're a man we're here to help you. If you have a problem because you're gay feel free to contact the LGBT rights people.
/r/MensRights27/07/14 06:58 AM
2

Upon further reflection You have my utmost respect. you don't think society provides any mitigating factor in how often women admit to desiring sex? Of course it does, that's why self-reporting on sexual habits is so unreliable. The difference between the sex drive of men and women is probably a lot smaller than the popular culture of the early 1900's would have you believe. Still, there is a difference, and it is probably greater than our current feminist-indoctrinated culture seems to believe.…
/r/MensRights25/07/14 09:07 AM
26

I'm not sure how we could help you through the internet apart from encouraging you to keep fighting, and directing you to organizations that might actually help you, like FIRE. Seek professional help immediately.
/r/MensRights24/07/14 07:20 AM
4

Men don't want sex more often If this would be true there would be an equal demand for male prostitutes, women would consume the same amount of porn as men, "sex addiction" (lol) wouldn't be a mostly male problem, etc. Women receiving testosterone treatment report increased libido. Men simply want sex more, it's not rocket science. Women tend to be more exclusive with their pool of partners, for biological reasons. Yep, and to be able to do that they need a weaker sex drive. Men tend to be less …
/r/MensRights24/07/14 06:17 AM
2

http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/757129_5
/r/MensRights24/07/14 06:14 AM
0

It was the premise of the post...
/r/TheRedPill24/07/14 06:01 AM
11

whichever one makes you the happiest So many guys are forgetting that this is the most important thing in a relationship. I wouldn't trade a loving 6 for a 9 with a bitchy personality that is so common nowadays. Fucking a woman is one thing, but living with her is another - personality matters way more in LTRs than in purely sexual encounters.
/r/TheRedPill23/07/14 09:23 AM
3

Puritans believed that a man could choose to give up sex with relatively little trouble, but for a woman to be so deprived would be much more difficult for her. That's hardly evidence now, is it... It is a biological fact that men want sex more than women: desire is mainly caused by testosterone in both sexes, but men have about ten times as much as women. If women wanted sex as much as men do, humanity would be one collective orgy, probably. (This does not mean of course that there aren't men o…
/r/MensRights23/07/14 08:53 AM
-13

No sexual violence campaign is "excellent", practically all of them are harmful by spreading rape hysteria. And extending victim status to men is irrelevant in this regard. Actual sexual assaults are rare (as opposed to consensual drunken sex), plus the media and the campuses are so full of "avareness raising" campaigns that we're waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay past the point where another campaign could help anyone with anything. Feminists jumped the shark 20 years ago, awareness raising is …
/r/MensRights23/07/14 07:19 AM
2

I disagree in only what I quoted from you: that she hits some nails. No she doesn't. It's just a formality, really, don't take it personally :)
/r/MensRights22/07/14 11:02 AM
10

Anita Sarkeesian is a [...] feminist holding a hammer looking for nails. And yeah, sometimes she actually hits them Nope. You can boil down all her tripe to two basic ideas: 1. there is not enough entertainment for women/feminists; 2. there is "bad" entertainment out there. Both ideas are stupid. Entertainment is a free market, it sells things for profit. If you don't find what you're looking for it's not mysygyny or a deep-seated cultural problem - it simply means that there's not enough demand…
/r/MensRights22/07/14 07:29 AM
5

The whole premise is retarded, since rescuing women is a possible scenario in fictional stories, so it is inevitable that some stories will have it. There is no problem with it whatsoever. It's not demeaning to women that they are treated as realistic human beings who can be kidnapped, robbed, killed, whatever. The fundamental problem with Sarkeesian and all other feminists complaining about gaming and culture is that they don't want to create entertainment for women/feminists, they want to dest…
/r/MensRights22/07/14 07:09 AM
2

It's libel, basically. There is no source for this "quote", but he attacked both TAA and the MRM with it anyways.
/r/MensRights21/07/14 06:41 PM
2

What are your thoughts on this? Most countries in the world do not have voluntary armies. Even the US has mandatory registration for men. And most volunteers sign up hoping they won't have to go to war. This is why when the orders come the number of pregnancies among female soldiers rise significantly: they want the benefits of serving in the armed forces but they are not stupid enough to go to war. But of course men don't have this escape route.
/r/MensRights21/07/14 05:21 AM
1

There were no male slaves in Ireland since 1860 That is a very brave thing to say :) Human trafficking and forced labour is a lot more complex subject than feminists portray it to be. Of course they only talk about the suffering of women, but actually about half of trafficked people forced to work in "underground" facilities are men. Don't tell me tens of thousands of women were forced to work for free in Ireland but not a single man was... That's just ignorance. And again, for the n+1th time we…
/r/MensRights15/07/14 01:00 PM
1

there were many incredibly important feminists throughout the last couple hundred years that changed the world for the better I understand where you're coming from but I think the feminists of the past were the same as the feminists of today. They pursued their own interests with whatever tactic seemed expedient. They lied, cheated and committed terrorist acts if it got them what they wanted. And the biggest problem is that the feminist movement of the 1800s grew out of marxist philosophy. It al…
/r/MensRights15/07/14 12:30 PM
1

I learnt History, your argument there is ridiculous Stuff generally tought in the school system is way too inadequate. I meant actually sitting down and reading stuff in an autodidact way, understanding connections and context. It wasn't meant as a personal insult, 98% of people don't know shit about history. The most frequent sign of not understanding history is the belief in the mythical oppression of women. your whole argument about fighting for male rights is irrelevant, I am all for that It…
/r/MensRights15/07/14 11:04 AM
1

I know you don't care but still I'll try to get one thought through. I never said that "women had it good" or that "women didn't have hardships". You can cite tons of things showing that women had it bad, okay, everybody gets it. Thing is, women had it bad because times were harsh, not because men oppressed them. And men also had it bad, 99% of the time even worse than women (because times were harsh, remember?). In the middle ages if a woman was poor and had nothing to eat you can bet a hundred…
/r/MensRights14/07/14 07:39 PM
1

38 years is hardly "a few hundred". But there are some really basic concerns with this regardless of the actual numbers. The most important one is that a simple number does not prove oppression. The 38 years of difference could be caused by dozens of different things, oppression of women being just one possibility. Until you prove that it is actually caused by men being evil and denying women something they wanted, any other explanation is possible: Maybe women didn't want the vote. Maybe some w…
/r/MensRights14/07/14 07:15 PM
1

lol, more hyperbole The global average difference between men and women getting the voting rights was 10 years. In many places they received the right to vote simultaneously. Hyperbole my ass :) What's more, in many countries men still have to serve in the military / sign up for the draft to earn the voting rights women receive for free. Some equality... But it's really not that important as it's made out to be. What do you get out of voting in these contemporary illusionary democracies? One par…
/r/MensRights14/07/14 03:49 PM
0

It's basic evolutionary psychology. Women are valuable for the survival of humanity but men aren't, and our whole species is genetically conditioned to the very core to act upon this notion. Feminism is an underhanded ideology playing upon this very instinct while completely denying it exists. What have feminists ever done apart from bitching and crying to men to help them? Nothing. All their "results" were given to them by others as answers to their cries as damsels in distress.
/r/MensRights14/07/14 12:08 PM
2

I was talking about the 1st world; Europe + the anglosphere, if you will. In our cultures women are (and were) treated preferentially. Yeah, they couldn't vote for a couple of years while men could in some countries but on the other hand they couldn't be convicted of certain crimes or the law punished their husbands instead, etc. I'd say that's a way more useful privilege than having the right to vote, which, let's be honest here, amounts to nothing. If you couldn't vote in the next election, wo…
/r/MensRights14/07/14 11:56 AM
1

Utter bollocks. the feminist movement came about as a necessity when women were inferior It was always political and never 'necessary'. Women were never "inferior", and were never oppressed by men in an organized (societal) fashion. (A husband being a jackass does not constitute gender oppression.) Men and women had different rights (not more or less), which does not mean one had it better than the other. today I feel it is still necessary Sure, we need more lies and propaganda still. We need mo…
/r/MensRights14/07/14 08:38 AM
2

Welcome.
/r/MensRights11/07/14 08:33 PM
3

Most of them are taken out of context. For example you can read what Paul Elam's wrote on AVFM: [Fogg Alert! Satire!] That’s it. In the name of equality and fairness, I am proclaiming October to be Bash a Violent Bitch Month. I’d like to make it the objective for the remainder of this month, and all the Octobers that follow, for men who are being attacked and physically abused by women - to beat the living shit out of them. I don’t mean subdue them, or deliver an open handed pop on the face to g…
/r/MensRights10/07/14 08:10 AM
7

“Circumcision, if you ban it, you have three choices: You do it underground illegally, you take a little 8-day-old baby across state lines — and if you have contiguous states [with bans], doing that becomes harder and harder — or three, you emigrate,” said [Forman, who is Jewish]. Or, maybe, you could just stop mutilating 8 day old boys. Also, emigration is not such a bad idea, since you have your own country where you can do your barbaric stuff freely. If you can't fit into a civilized society …
/r/MensRights10/07/14 07:42 AM
4

A good article, but the original is a lot better. Of course it has its faults, thanks to its leftist/feminist perspective but there are many good points in it.
/r/MensRights09/07/14 10:11 AM
1

It is absolute bullshit, just like 99% of their other ideas like the invisible patriarchy which oppresses women by giving them privileges, or the free market corporations that pay men 25% extra just for possessing a penis. If you do anything, anything at all, you can be said to objectify the person involved in your action. If you buy a cup of coffee you objectify the guy behind the counter. This is utter nonsense, meaningless sophistry. Par for the course in postmodern dialogue. See the Sokal af…
/r/MensRights09/07/14 09:44 AM
5

It's called Sweden but the experiment already went on for more than a year...
/r/MensRights09/07/14 08:08 AM
2

Stop linking to bullshit.
/r/MensRights07/07/14 10:52 AM
0

Most people classify [rape] as second only to murder as the worst thing that can happen to a person. That is just the effect of the feminist hysteria. Would you rather be stabbed, shot, severly beaten, etc., than to have sex with someone once? Fuck no. Most sane people would choose 10 rapes over a punctured kidney or blinded eye.
/r/MensRights07/07/14 07:25 AM
0

I think that to hold rape--given these circumstances I just laid out--as a special kind of evil and above assault is a form of slut-shaming I was right with you till this point. To say that to punish men severly for a not-so-special crime just because it's against women is "slut shaming" is the twisted logic feminists use to blame everything on the mythical patriarkee. The special attention rape recieves is a testimony to women's elevated status, it has nothing to do with slut shaming. Society p…
/r/MensRights07/07/14 07:14 AM
1

Because if you want children, you probably want to raise them properly, ie. in an intact biological family. Marriage is still the best way to do that. But marriage doesn't serve any other purpose, so, marry only if the first child is already on the way.
/r/MensRights04/07/14 06:18 AM
2

Only marry if you want children and the first one is already on the way. Otherwise it's just an utterly unnecessary russian roulette.
/r/MensRights03/07/14 05:10 PM
7

Implying that Elliot Rodger was connected to the MRM in any way is an instant disqualifier. Standard feminist claptrap.
/r/MensRights03/07/14 12:38 PM
1

Is there anything good about men? from Roy Baumeister.
/r/MensRights03/07/14 12:32 PM
0

MZB was a disgusting piece of shit with a sick, disturbed mind. It is a testament to the madness of feminism and society in general that not only she got away with desecrating one of the most important inspirational myths for men and boys everywhere in the world (the legend of Arthur and the knights of the Round Table), she was celebrated for it. It was a hateful attack on male values and ideals.
/r/MensRights30/06/14 06:12 PM
15

Erhm, this is standard feminist claptrap about how "patriarchy is bad for men too" with a feelgood message added at the end. I don't see how it's good for us. .
/r/MensRights29/06/14 05:09 PM
1

Automatically upvoted. 6oodfella is a genius.
/r/MensRights29/06/14 07:27 AM
8

I think I understand what you're aiming at but this is meaningless for a couple of reasons. The MRM is a political movement trying to restore/protect the human rights of men, the Red Pill is a worldview probably too complicated to describe here (but I'll try anyways). The red pill analogy from Matrix means you have been lied to all your life about important aspects of your life. These include but are not limited to relationships, health, fitness, food, politics, culture, and so on. (The Red Pill…
/r/MensRights28/06/14 03:16 PM
6

It's the usual feminist distortion, talking only about how "women had it bad". Like that would mean that men had it good... Pfff. Men had it worse than women but no feminist cares about that. "Women had it bad" = "men oppressed them". Fuckin' idiots.
/r/MensRights28/06/14 08:40 AM
3

How do people find TRP misogynistic? Most people are idiots. I know it sounds dismissive and/or simplistic but it is actually the correct answer.
/r/TheRedPill28/06/14 05:50 AM
1

Thank you for answering honestly. I hope you understand if I disagree on some parts it's nothing personal :) The main problem with most of your points is that the radical feminists are the mainstream. I have no problem with people wanting equality, and I can accept if they think they have to call themselves feminists if they do. But they are a miniscule minority inside feminism. The vast majority of feminists follow and support radicals like Jessica Valenti (who wrote an article about Rodger & t…
/r/MensRights26/06/14 08:20 AM
1

Forgive me for saying this but your comment has at least as much passive aggression as my post. My point is relevant and I want to highlight this to (potential) MRAs who are on the fence about feminism being legit. It's not. The dictionary definition is bullshit. Most mainstream feminists don't care about equality at all, they just have an axe to grind. This is perfectly exemplified by the #yesallwomen bullshit. That has absolutely nothing to do with equal rights between the sexes, that is 100% …
/r/MensRights26/06/14 06:36 AM
2

Responding to recent controversy, Ubisoft has confirmed that both males and females will be hostages They're doing it wrong, females should only be heroes. Ubisoft should know better than to represent women as damsels in distress... /s Seriously though, is anything good enough for feminists? Let's think about it: female hostage - damsel in distress, a huge no-no only male hostages - females are not represented in the game, male nerd gamer culture, phooey male swat members - no strong female char…
/r/MensRights25/06/14 11:38 AM
4

I find it ironic that their symbol is a clenched fist, they march with banners with words like "smash" and "fight", but they say it's us promoting violence.
/r/MensRights10/06/14 10:38 AM
4

what does the MR movement do to aid the minorities? You got lost, buddy. The movement for racial issues is called the civil rights movement. We are not racists, we don't treat men differently based on their skin color.
/r/MensRights06/06/14 07:01 AM
2

That's a lose-lose scenario. The question could be reframed a lot of different ways but I think it boils down to: will you let your mother hold both you and your brother as hostages? If you are willing to give up your own life to support your family, that's commendable. On the other hand you seem to be a decent guy who deserves a better life. Tough choice. I reckon your mother will find other sources to rely on if you quit. They won't starve to death even if you don't give them a single cent. Wh…
/r/MensRights04/06/14 07:48 AM
4

a lot of people from both groups seek to demonize the other gender, or present themselves as "victims" of the other gender Erhm, nope. Feminists have a problem with men. (Sometimes they call them "the patriarchy" but that's just code for men.) On the other hand MRAs have a problem with a political movement that is openly hateful towards men. That's a huuuuge difference. The MRM has no problem with women whatsoever.
/r/MensRights04/06/14 06:30 AM
2

My comment was a direct answer to the title of the post: "#Notallmen rape, but #Yesallwomen live in fear of the ones that will". Feminists force men into a corner with this misandrist rhetoric. There are only two valid answers to this emotional bullying: either give in and be their lackey, or tell them to fuck off. And sure as hell I won't let them bully me into submission. Dear feminist, you say you fear men? What can I do about? Nothing. I won't feel sorry for you and I won't shame/police othe…
/r/MensRights04/06/14 06:18 AM
2

What do you think? I think that if you don't like the dress code you should look for another school instead of throwing a hissy fit. Nobody forces you to stay at a school you don't like. And enough with the meaningless feminist bullshit already.
/r/MensRights03/06/14 07:46 AM
6

"#Notallmen rape, but #Yesallwomen live in fear of the ones that will" Well... Who gives a fuck? If you want to live in fear, be my guest. You don't have to, it's your conscious choice, with a little help from the feminist rape hysteria. (You can thank them for that.) Is it my job to make certain that you don't irrationally fear statistically unlikely bullshit? Are your irrational fears a good enough reason to participate in a hate movement aimed at bashing and demonizing half of humanity? GTFO.
/r/MensRights03/06/14 07:43 AM
3

Having to shave your legs to be able to reap male attention is certainly a much bigger problem than living under the bridge and nobody giving a fuck :) Your answer is a nice summary of what feminism is all about. Sweeping real problems (suicide, homelessness) under the rug and instead focusing on contradictory bullshit like women having to endure male attention (catcalling), and having to do certain things to attract the same male attention (shaving legs).
/r/MensRights03/06/14 07:37 AM
-1

Well, in reality less than 1 in 71 women are rape victims, and far less than 1 in 71 men are rape victims. Stop broadening the definition of rape, please.
/r/MensRights02/06/14 11:02 AM
2

Swedish women are the least hostile towards men? Come on... Feminist bullshit.
/r/MensRights02/06/14 10:58 AM
1

How do you define Rape Culture? Rape culture is: When the rape of one group is overlooked, dismissed as impossible or irrelevant, or made fun of. That group is males, and its rape is dismissed and ridiculed by feminists. Nobody dismisses the rape of women. When someone talks about the rape of underage girls being fine and dandy - the only instance of which I ever saw in the Vagina Monologues by Eve Ensler, a radical feminist. The VM originally contained the line "It was a good rape". No man ever…
/r/MensRights30/05/14 09:13 AM
2

Our archetype is one of power, so when we conform to that we are heavily rewarded. Well, to be a lot more precise, out of the dozens who aim for a position of power one is heavily rewarded, the others failing to various degrees, often landing at the bottom of society. While men are overrepresented at the top, they are also overrepresented at the bottom, and for every CEO or congressman there are at least a dozen a homeless guys. Funny how feminists never talk about that.
/r/MensRights30/05/14 09:01 AM
2

there seems to be more than a little outright hatred of feminism and feminists, which really goes a long way to confirming the image that Men's Rights forums are little more than echo chambers for men who are angry with women. Feminism =/= women. Being angry at a political movement =/= hating a sex (gender). And we have good reason to be angry at feminism since it used the last ~50 years to bash and demonize men in every way, shape or form possible. You can thank feminism for the rape hysteria, …
/r/MensRights30/05/14 08:45 AM
1

I consider a "feminist" to be a person who has concern for the social situation of women, especially with regard to increasing the variety of options for women in society. So Simone De Beauvoir wasn't a feminist then, considering this quote from her: "No woman should be authorized to stay at home and raise her children. Society should be totally different. Women should not have that choice, precisely because if there is such a choice, too many women will make that one." To be ontopic, sure, it w…
/r/MensRights28/05/14 08:08 AM
2

Thank you for voicing my opinion, couldn't upvote enough.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 06:20 AM
2

Look, you can't just accuse people of shit and then expect them to act like nothing happened. About your actual point, well, it's a question of proportions. Considering how less than 1% of men are rapists or stalkers, a general fear of men is absolutely unfounded. On the other hand dating is starting to look like a bowl of randomly laxative'd cookies to men in the west. A lot more than just 1% of women are poisoned by feminism and the femi-centric "princess snowflake" zeitgeist. Some reluctance …
/r/MensRights27/05/14 03:44 PM
3

That is entirely true, and this is why the concept has no meaning anymore.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 11:32 AM
1

Actually it is a good point. There is no future for a feminist-friendly MRM. They came out of the woodwork to blame the latest shootings on us without any actual link, reason or evidence, and it speaks volumes about what you can expect from them. If they have the chance they will destroy our movement either from the outside or the inside - whichever seems more practical at the time. Trying to appease them will never lead us anywhere.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 11:30 AM
5

the MRA movement, I think it can be sexist and racist at times My ass.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 11:22 AM
1

In this case both are wrong. Men don't have to be told they want sex and companionship, it's a basic human need. 1 in a million go insane if they are desperately lonely for too long, it has nothing to do with what other people supposedly tell them about their self-worth. Of course Valenti is a hateful bigot, TyphonBlue OTOH just overthought things a little. She is a lot closer to the truth, but still misses the mark a little.
/r/MensRights26/05/14 11:11 AM
1

Oh, I see. So Thomas James Ball ignited himself not because the feminist inspired laws and the feminist controlled family court fucked up his life beyond repair but because I think that men and women are not the same, and as such, their different capabilities and desires should be taken into account when the state defines their rights and responsibilities. Wait just a second while I check how sound this argument is. Edit: Also tell me again how me having ideas about a different world influences …
/r/MensRights21/05/14 11:35 AM
11

Her point, and every other pro-circumcision people's point is that FGM is done to girls and MGM is done to boys. Of course you can't compare the two. It's like - if you let me draw an analogy - they talk about a baby that got squashed by a truck and you say "well ants get squashed all the time". Who the fuck cares about ants??? You can't compare the two. It's never about the amount of skin or flesh that gets cut or anything measurable. Girls are valuable, boys are a dime a dozen. But it's not se…
/r/MensRights21/05/14 11:25 AM
1

Considering how tradition and traditionalism has already been destroyed by cultural marxism, I doubt you could back up your assertion with an intelligible explanation. VAWA is not the work of this vague idea of "traditionalism", it's the pet project of the explicitly feminist Joe Biden. Our current laws and policies are a lot more influenced by feminists like Obama and Hillary than the bogeyman of traditionalism. To be honest I doubt you could define what you actually mean by traditionalism. Wha…
/r/MensRights21/05/14 10:41 AM
2

Cannot upvote enough. Bravo!
/r/MensRights20/05/14 07:11 AM
3

sexism can only be men discriminating against women That's the most sexist thought ever. You can't wake her up to her own sexism, it's a paradox, a snake biting its own tail. The basic belief she built every other connected idea on is that she can't be sexist, no matter what, ever. And she will protect this notion furiously. When you try to explain to her that sexism cuts both ways she feels like you are attacking her very person.
/r/MensRights20/05/14 07:08 AM
12

Well, to be honest 95% of men's rights is antifeminism, because 95% of men's "gendered" problems are directly caused by the feminist lies and undermining tactics aimed at men. Of course MRAs attack feminism, any decent human being should attack feminism because it is a hate movement (as proven by the words of OP's girlfriend, among millions of other things).
/r/MensRights20/05/14 07:02 AM
15

Well that's their own fucking fault This is all you need to know. It is saying that hating men is just fine. it's a society that they rule Men rule nothing because men are not a class. Rich and poor are social classes but men and women aren't. The rich rule, men don't. Basic empathy and elementary logic, really. (White and black, hetero- and homosexuals, etc. are also not social classes. Projecting class warfare ideology onto them is silly and atrocious.)
/r/MensRights20/05/14 06:55 AM
2

there is some fallacy in here. ? 99% of what she says is meaningless feminist rhetoric and bullshit, at least for as long as I could stand to watch the video. Girls are taught to value virginity, oh my, that is certainly a good reason why we'd need a movement of angry women who hate men... (I also wonder why she can't get it that trying to protect young girls from teen pregnancies, emotional problems and STDs is not some patriarchal masterplan to oppress womankind.) The slut-stud double standard…
/r/MensRights24/04/14 09:31 AM
6

Actually we can talk about anything we damn well please and the sub against the human rights of half of humanity can sod off for all I care. We don't need haters' approval or validation.
/r/MensRights18/04/14 08:33 AM
1

Code is not "men's voice", it's a tool for a job with strict rules. How will women's voice change this? For idiots everything is an ideological war. Who writes our apps and games? It's not some designated victim group??? Revolt!!! How about a strange new world where we don't decide who's the better professional by taking a peek in their underwear? Tech is not a place for an ideological war. It does not need any group's political voice, it needs to produce stuff that people buy. If you want to wo…
/r/MensRights14/04/14 06:51 AM
2

You spelled her name wrong. It's Harridan Harmmen.
/r/MensRights14/04/14 06:37 AM
1

Well, considering how those "moral standards" mostly consist of pedestalizing women for no apparent reason, plus some fake feminist indignation for good measure, I don't see why that should be a problem. Wanting to get laid is a natural urge, there is nothing sinister about it - it's even celebrated in women, but men are denigrated for it. How's that for a double standard? And what you don't seem to realize is that TRP is not something that defines your goals, you do that for yourself. TRP is ju…
/r/MensRights09/04/14 06:21 AM
5

The statistics do not compare the same jobs. When Obama says women get 77 cents on a man's dollar he refers to statistics comparing the average wage of ALL men to the average wage of ALL women. This is misleading to say the least. It's comparing apples to oranges. You could try to argue that it is because gender discrimination that women CHOOSE jobs with lower pay but that would be just plain silly. This is a free world, nobody is barred from studying or working in any field. When a girl decides…
/r/MensRights08/04/14 10:03 AM
-1

TRP's bad reputation comes from the same place as ours. To be honest there is nothing wrong with TRP, it's just "progressives" spreading lies about it constantly.
/r/MensRights08/04/14 09:40 AM
-1

/downvotemagnet We shouldn't participate in the oppression olympics. We can't and won't beat the feminists in this idiotic game. People in general don't take male victims seriously, and insisting on us being victims too will only discredit us as whiners and losers who want to take away the attention and support which is rightfully women's (in their minds, that is). What is even more important, feminists worked hard for ~50 years to unjustly broaden the meaning of rape, violence and harassment, a…
/r/MensRights08/04/14 08:55 AM
2

When most of academia is about censoring everything un-PC you know it's been hijacked by a totalitarian ideology. It's also a given that you can't trust its "findings" any more - especially for subjects that are the favorite topics of the aforementioned totalitarian ideology, like race or gender.
/r/MensRights28/03/14 09:00 AM
1

I'm totally chill, thanks. How my emotional state would be relevant to the observation I made is beyond me, but hey... Still, I don't remember OP saying "I did nothing to deserve this" (or anything aimed at this end), so, a commenter could not say this with confidence even with "if everything you state is true then...." in mind. In fact OP said "I must have said the wrong thing" which could imply that he escalated the situation in some way. I would love the MRM to have the integrity, honesty, an…
/r/MensRights28/03/14 07:27 AM
1

So, you are asserting that someone can deserve to endure physical abuse? LOL I didn't assert anything like that but you can try to imply I did, albeit it's more than a tad bit dishonest. "you did nothing to deserve this" is a stupid sentiment because it implies that the OP is 100% innocent in every imaginable way. Which of course would be total bullshit in 99% of all DV cases, regardless of the sex of the offender and the victim. Most people just don't go around attacking their own family member…
/r/MensRights28/03/14 07:13 AM
-12

Please realize that you did nothing to deserve this. That's a dangerous sentiment, especially considering you don't know jack about their situation. It sounds eerily similar to a feminist victim mantra.
/r/MensRights27/03/14 03:25 PM
1

Pure gold, thank you.
/r/TheRedPill26/03/14 07:59 AM
2

There is absolutely no need to compare the two. "Lesser" mutilation is okay, or acceptable? Let's be honest here, what we're talking about is not a scientific or moral question, it's plain sexism dismissing men's problems because many people deem women more valuable. It's clear as daylight. If all MGM were worse than all FGM, would feminists fight against MGM and discard FGM as "less serious"? Sure... What you have read about FGM is rife with feminist distortions. FGM has many forms, some of whi…
/r/MensRights26/03/14 07:47 AM
2

I see some people don't understand sarcasm without the /s tag...
/r/MensRights25/03/14 02:43 PM
-11

Feminists only want equality between the sexes, don't ya know? Look up 'feminism' in the dictionary you ignorant fool!
/r/MensRights25/03/14 09:44 AM
-6

I've said it before and I'll say it again: I watched the video and I agree with her this time. Regardless of who she is, these so-called protesters got into her face really badly and they did everything they could to annoy her as much as possible. I would have punched them in the face a lot sooner than the professor snapped. That wasn't terrorism by a long shot but it was abuse, and she had the moral right to stop them abusing her. So, the MRM should reevaluate its stance on this matter. It is d…
/r/MensRights25/03/14 09:29 AM
1

Absolutely true but you will be downvoted anyways because fake indignation trumps truth.
/r/MensRights21/03/14 09:05 AM
1

Victim blaming my ass. There is a clear difference between being a victim and playing the fool. The court heard the man say he had not invited or wanted any sexual contact but he said he got under the covers with Mr Evans after he was "escorted" to his bedroom. He was asked by prosecutor Mark Heywood QC why he had followed the MP into his bed when his intention had been to sleep alone in an attic at the address in the village of Pendleton. The witness replied: I don't know. Come on, GTFO. If you…
/r/MensRights21/03/14 08:15 AM
1

As others have said already: he shouldn't be charged, his daughter should be. Shooting an intruder in your own home who's raping your daughter is hardly a crime. Having your secret boyfriend killed by lying that he's a rapist, on the other hand...
/r/TheRedPill19/03/14 12:49 PM
4

You are just a racist scumbag, what else is there to say?
/r/MensRights14/03/14 04:07 PM
5

a bunch of other angry white people This will discredit you in any decent conversation.
/r/MensRights14/03/14 08:21 AM
5

Opposing someone's political views is not racism you effin retard. Racism would be if he wondered why blacks get promoted instead of whites, but he didn't do that by any stretch of the imagination.
/r/MensRights14/03/14 07:41 AM
0

I know, I know, I'm an RPer myself :) There are not many good women out there, but you can find one if you know what you're looking for. Giving up on meeting a good woman is giving up on having meaningful relationships and a family.
/r/TheRedPill11/03/14 08:34 AM
0

This is poison. Good women do exist and I have mine to prove it. Don't let yourselves be embittered by pessimistic shit like this.
/r/TheRedPill10/03/14 10:54 AM
2

If a woman thinks she is better than you she can't respect you An interesting thought: by demanding that men respect them, women insist on us admitting that they are better than men.
/r/TheRedPill26/02/14 09:57 AM
2

You should probably hire 2-3 girls for a couple of bucks each to keep slapping these idiots for a good 10 minutes just to see what happens.
/r/MensRights26/02/14 08:15 AM
3

Ehrm, you need "proof" that men are better at sports than women? You're a retard then. The sexes are separated at competitions because women can't compete with men. This is true even for chess - the only woman who ever competed with men and got some success was Judith Polgar. She peaked at #8 in the world. I mention chess specifically because it's a mental activity not involving physical power, which makes it comparable to e-sports. Downvoting the obvious truth because it's not politically corre…
/r/MensRights19/02/14 01:28 PM
1

If you want to call the aim for a calm and reasonable discussion about rape "minimizing rape", well, rape should be minimized. But of course you don't want discussion, you want to shut it down.
/r/MensRights19/02/14 10:39 AM
2

Maybe there are less women in e-sports because men are better players. Whoaaa, outrageous sexism!!! That is until you realize that men are simply better in pretty much every sport from chess to weightlifting. Why would e-sports be an exception? Tell me just one reason. Edit: It seems we have a downvote brigade invasion. Hey guys, downvoting is easy, coming up with an actual answer is a lot harder, right?
/r/MensRights19/02/14 08:43 AM
2

Don't Tell Me I'm Beautiful Don't worry, you aren't. You might look youthful but your mind is rotten.
/r/MensRights19/02/14 08:34 AM
1

We're not talking about washing the dishes here, but the tactics of the men's rights movement. If we MRAs turn into primadonnas we might as well hand over our balls to the feminists on a silver plate.
/r/MensRights18/02/14 10:10 PM
1

Actually, a false rape accusation is way worse than getting raped if it leads to incarceration. Which one would you choose: somebody f_cks you against your will tonight, or you lose your family, your job, your reputation, and you spend the next 20 years in prison? No sane person on the planet would choose the former. Also, 99% of "the problems women faced before feminism" are feminist lies and distortions. They got the vote a full 10 years later than men, globally speaking - oh, the unspeakable …
/r/MensRights18/02/14 07:03 PM
3

I'm talking about the men's rights movement, not about your sexual relationships.
/r/MensRights18/02/14 01:39 PM
5

You mentioning transgender is exactly what I referred to when writing "everyone around here talks about silly nonsense". Let the transgender movement care about their own issues, this is MEN'S RIGHTS for Pete's sake. We have our own legitimate problems and we can't let ourselves be hijacked by the "what about the letter soup people?" idiots.
/r/MensRights18/02/14 01:37 PM
3

So, there is nothing unmanly about men doing housekeeping work Oh, cool, a politically correct soundbite endorsed by our feminist enablers. It's just a-okay for us to be feminized, and be ruled by masculine women, right? Of course many men have/had to raise their children on their own but that is besides the point. The point is that we are letting ourselves be feminized, and the best proof of this is that when an outsider says we're pussies many of us react with "it's okay to be a pussy". Well, …
/r/MensRights18/02/14 01:11 PM
4

It's fascinating how everyone around here talks about silly nonsense while carefully avoiding the valid point of this criticism. Whoever wrote this post is perfectly right in that: We can't and shouldn't fight biology, We shouldn't adopt feminine debating/lobbying methods, We shouldn't try to fight for the pity of society or a new victim card. This should be mandatory reading in the MRM.
/r/MensRights18/02/14 12:56 PM
4

For all intents and purposes, MR is antifeminism. You could dance around this but that would be meaningless. And so is a debate about semantics - we have much bigger problems than to let us be pulled into the stupid debate about how "feminism" is undefineable or anything NAFALT-oriented. Sommers is not a feminist regardless of what she says because she was cast out by the feminist community. She actually believes in equality and it shows feminists' true colors that they ostracized her for it. We…
/r/MensRights18/02/14 09:55 AM
0

Erhm, sex is not "something else" the way money is. Having a sexual interest in somebody is having an interest in them - having an interest in their money is not.
/r/MensRights18/02/14 07:55 AM
0

Let's be honest, robots suck. They will probably suck real bad for another 100 years. Contrary to the popular feminist mantra men do want more than a slab of meat to put their dicks into. I'd say the way forward for novel sexual exploits is brain/sensory manipulation. Your brain experiencing having sex with a living, breathing Katy Perry is on a whole other level than having a robot lookalike. Of course we're not there yet technologically, but I bet some of us will live to see it (just like real…
/r/TheRedPill13/02/14 12:40 PM
-1

Women should get the same rights, respect, and protection that are given to children. No more, no less. Erhm, let men, women and children be three distinct categories all having their own balanced set of rights and responsibilities - just like it was in the old days. The century-long experiment in the west trying to prove that men and women are the same failed miserably.
/r/TheRedPill13/02/14 12:30 PM
3

So, yeah umm this thread is supposed to be about controversial ideas. Why am I getting shit again? I didn't read the replies yet but it's a conversation, my friend. People tend to weigh in on interesting issues. Just like I will do now: What you described here is a very low-level way of looking at things. Most people know nothing about their own instincts, and so they are controlled by them, just like animals. They way out of this, the way up is to learn about your instincts, understand them, an…
/r/TheRedPill13/02/14 12:25 PM
1

If it was true then it would be okay, because the truth is always more important than some idiots' artificially enflated sensibilities. But it's a stupid myth.
/r/MensRights13/02/14 11:54 AM
2

Sweet Jesus it's disgusting.
/r/MensRights13/02/14 11:51 AM
2

I want to know if you guys really can debunk feminism with facts and evidence. This is a good place to start.
/r/MensRights10/02/14 08:52 AM
3

You're not missing anything, it's 100% pure pseudo-intellectual SJW bullshit. If browsing the internet gives you seizures, stay the fuck away.
/r/MensRights07/02/14 08:51 AM
8

Is there any reason why the company should pay the same to a new CEO? Name just one. These numbers are sick, though. I feel so sorry for her that she will have to make do on that measly $4.4 million this year... Women are clearly oppressed. But receiving $4.68 million as an 'outside adviser' is beyond belief. What in the freakin' world could he offer to GM worth nearly 5 million dollars a year, what noone else could do for 1/10th of the money? He advises GM to concentrate on the Chinese market, …
/r/TheRedPill06/02/14 08:40 AM
1

The solution is not to ask for donations but to look for another venue. Who the fuck wants to support these lying thieving bastards???
/r/MensRights01/02/14 10:11 AM
8

/r/theredpill have dubious histories of racism, antisemitism, and holocaust denial If you think you can appease feminists and SJW asshats by throwing other men under the bus you're not only gravely mistaken but you're a fuckin' idiot as well. You are only giving them ammunition which they can use to gun down our potential allies. The last thing we need is dividing ourselves for easier conquering. Have you ever heard of "the enemy of my enemy..."? Munroe decides to clearly lump /r/mensrights into…
/r/MensRights27/01/14 04:49 PM
1

most of the time when I'm browsing TRP I find absolutes regarding gender People omit "most ...", "In my opinion...." and other such trivialities for the sake of brevity and clarity. It does not mean they "speak in absolutes". In most other topics this would go without saying, but of course we are not politically correct so we have to defend ourselves even from silly shit like this. If a gardener says "flowers are beautiful" you do not argue with him that there are ugly flowers because you unders…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/14 04:37 PM
0

From what I understand, red-pillers have a problem with women. Apparently you understand nothing about the red pill. It seems a diploma, learning 3 new languages, and being a human is not a good enough substitute for actually reading about the topic you want to discuss. What you think you "know" (erhm, lol) about TRP is a bunch of stereotypes spread by haters.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/14 04:12 PM
17

It seems you think people can know nothing else than their own immediate experiences, which is a very limited view on human intellect. Another problem is that you discard simple reality for the sake of beautiful theories. You like the idea that men and women are the same, and so you sweep the nasty truth under the rug. Getting sex is easy for most women: just go into a bar, lift your skirt, and a dozen guys will be willing to fuck you in the toilet. Similar (well, vaguely similar) experiments ha…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/14 04:05 PM
1

I don't assume the entire group of people all believe the same exact thing Funny how that works. How could TRP be a single coherent ideology if its followers believe in different things? Pardon me if I say that you seem to continually bend the framework of this conversation to fit your needs :) You can of course criticize TRP or TRPers, it's a free world. But when you say that TRP / TRPers stereotype instead of generalize you immediately commit the same mistake. (TRP as an ideology can't stereot…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/14 03:47 PM
0

TRP is a single ideology. Any peer reviewed sources for this? :) TRP is not complete yet, so to say - its followers debate it every day. It is not a single ideology. You only think it is because you stereotype it/us in your own mind as such. For you it's easier to attack us if you handle TRP as a single entity (which it isn't).
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/14 03:26 PM
2

Men should talk themselves out of their repulsion if their repulsion is based on hypocrisy and sexism. You confuse a few things. Men love sluts, or at least they love to have sex with them. They are not repulsed by a hot female body even if they know how many other guys have been there. Sexual desire have nothing to do with hypocrisy or sexism - what makes a penis erect is not some conscious thought process but a series of sensory inputs. This can't be controlled and your attempts at shaming men…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/14 12:52 PM
2

I genuinely don't buy that this attraction is that uncontrollable in this particular case LOL What you're trying to say is men should be able to desire something they don't because... because you want them to. Because that would be the nice thing for them to do, right? Why couldn't they just override their own desires to be more progressive, more politically correct??? Not desiring sluts is not "wrong". They are damaged people, factually and statistically speaking. This is not RP hate, this is s…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/14 12:30 PM
1

But those beliefs about relationships are just plain incorrect. That is a very brave thing to say, because it implies that your beliefs (and only yours) are totally correct. Where do you get that notion from? Are you a relationship therapist with a 100% success? Did all your relationships go well and ended the way you wanted them to end? Are you confident that your ideas will work for everybody else on the planet? If your answer to any of these questions is "no" then you should probably rethink …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/14 12:26 PM
1

LOL, what a bunch of stereotypical nonsense. TRP does not want women to be chaste. Promiscuous women gradually lose their ability to pair-bond with a man, making them a worse prospect for marriage regardless of paternity testing - mentioning which is a stupid idea because when you find out "your" kid is not yours then you're already fucked, so the test did not spare you all the trouble, did it? It's infinitely wiser to choose a better mate. But then again, as I have already said it, since most T…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/14 12:20 PM
1

Yeah, it's always men writing articles like "where have all the good men women gone?" It's not like there are thousands of articles out there discussing how women should entice their reluctant boyfriends to propose.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/14 12:11 PM
0

However TRP is also an entity, with a strict set of beliefs. Try saying that about feminism.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/14 10:47 AM
1

That's what I believe TRP should do. But apparently you don't want to do that. You just want others to comply to certain standards, you don't feel the need to apply the same to yourself. You can stereotype TRPers all day, that's just mighty fine because you're a liberal goodguy, and liberal goodguys are allowed to do anything because their ends justify their means, right? This is why a "tolerant" person should not tolerate anything s/he disagrees with - but I digress. Yours is a faulty moral sta…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/14 10:44 AM
1

"TRPer's understanding of women is much more nuanced than TBPer's understanding of TRPers." Gold.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/14 10:36 AM
1

Well, asking aliens to show their armpits seems to be a very bad way of avoiding them if they have dark spots... Like asking black guys if they're muggers. I wonder how well that would work in real life as opposed to in a progressive liberal's thought experiment.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/14 10:34 AM
1

This is just playing with semantics. Well-intentioned people know that others omit "most", "in my opinion" and other such trivialities for obvious reasons. Arguing about these is silly at best. This is not a peer reviewed scientific journal, this is reddit fcol.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/14 10:31 AM
0

Well, not exactly. You do realize that "that exists in TRP alone" is a huge generalization in itself, and it's rather false. The notion that women lack honor was around a long before TRP even existed. Also, when you say "negative qualities" it is you who pass moral judgement. TRP is strictly amoral (not to be confused with immoral). We don't say women are evil or bad. The one who makes that unnecessary connotation is you. It seems to me you have an aweful lot of unfounded stereotypes about TRP..…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/14 10:24 AM
1

thousands of years of oppression against women which has culminated in truly hazardous social conditions for them in the present day Does he live in Sudan or something? Because there is/was no such thing in the west. "truly hazardous social conditions" my ass, with men being the majority of the homeless, jailed, victims of violence, suicides, workplace deaths, etc.
/r/MensRights27/01/14 08:18 AM
7

Social Justice Warriors... What did you expect? Try to talk your best friend out of that marriage if at all possible.
/r/MensRights27/01/14 08:14 AM
2

This sounds reasonable but you're arguing against... nobody. Nobody ever said that any man should have any right to force any woman to terminate a pregnancy, or to carry it to term against her will (given that abortion is legal). The MR stance was always that which you describe here.
/r/MensRights27/01/14 08:02 AM
1

"97% of rapists don't spend a day in jail" I bet that more than 50% of rapes happen in jail, so...
/r/MensRights27/01/14 07:50 AM
3

I lack compassion for people who turn to hateful ideologies instead of looking inwards and becoming a better person. You must really despise feminists then. But since you yourself admitted that there is no actual hatred in RP...
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/14 07:08 PM
2

Well, no, I believe that the first few months of understanding the Red Pill is a phase of disillusionment, which makes outsiders think that RP is hateful, which is a misunderstanding. As for your original point, I still feel that I was right in calling out their bullshit, but I respect your call for a more refined debating stlye. Truth is, there's no point in debating either way. Cultures clash here, worldviews collide and this makes any concessions impossible. Reality-based and idea-based peopl…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/14 07:05 PM
3

No, I compared being blamed for something that is not your fault to being blamed for something that is not your fault. And there was no attack at all, I just point out the obvious, namely that I fault each person individually for lacking the basic observational skills Is the epitome of having no compassion, and trying to explain why you are justified in having no compassion does not help one bit. RP says women look down on men they perceive as losers - read your last paragraph: it is a bullshit …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/14 06:55 PM
2

I'm willing to bet a month's pay that you never heard the story of an MRA guy, I think it was Paul Elam. When he was holding training sessions and team building excercises one of his experiments was to show a whiteboard to people with the words "men are..." at the top of it, and he asked the participants to write words there which came to mind. You might probably guess where this is going. Pigs, evil, lazy, cads, deadbeats, etc. The groups involved both men and women but 9 out of 10 times nobody…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/14 06:11 PM
2

This debate is really hard because just like many other things, TRP has its own dark side. And you guys keep focusing on that, actively searching for examples of that while discarding the other 90% of material. If you understand the RP process, which you should by now, you should know that the feminized zeitgeist forces abysmal dating advice upon each and every guy in our culture. The sociopaths don't care about Disney bullshit and this is why they are successful with women: they can't be brainw…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/14 05:49 PM
-4

you don't quite have a grasp of what I'm saying Talking down to me some more... Okay. I'm not that much of an idiot to waste more time on this. I'm here to learn, you're here to win. I can't learn anything from you, so, you win. Cheers.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/14 05:24 PM
2

Let me get this straight. There is no actual hate around TRP, it's just we don't talk as highly of women as they got used to, so... We're mysygynysts? As far as I can tell RPers are not MGTOWs, they all want women in their lives. That's why they are here for Pete's sake. They love women. They just got disillusioned after long years of trying what they were supposed to try (ie. date women the Disney way). Each and every one of them believed that women are angels, and they suffered for it greatly.…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/14 05:19 PM
2

Look, I totally get where you're coming from and I would accept your criticism if you were honest. But you aren't. Let's just analyze the inherent absurdity of this situation for a second: I am a "redpiller". I saw the Matrix and I was there when the manosphere began to use the red pill metaphor. I wrote a blog about dating when it was relatively new, I wrote articles about "game" years ago. I think by now I have the right to say that I more or less know what the red pill is, and what it isn't. …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/14 08:46 AM
2

Women need a man to fill a leadership role. It says that right there. He wrote that women instinctively seek a leader, yes, but it does not imply in any way, shape or form that it is because "women are less capable". It implies that we have different psychosexual needs. Contrary to popular dogma "different" does not mean inferior/superior. I very rarely speak about RP ideas to outsiders so you might consider yourself honored when I take the time to explain that the core of RP knowledge is that t…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/14 08:26 AM
8

Look, denying the obvious because there are no peer reviewed studies proving it is still denying the obvious. And I bet that no matter how many studies I'd link, you still wouldn't change your mind because you place moral value in having the specific opinion you have regardless of it being true or not. And this is why I don't bother building arguments anymore. I've been debating these things for 10+ years now and there is always a new wave of enlightened liberals denying that feminism has anythi…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/14 07:55 AM
6

This is a lame excuse and you know it. Most social changes to the nuclear family structure in the last 60 years came from feminist origins, and if women are less happy in marriages than before, it is quite obvious it has something to do with feminism. Saying that the rise of the chip on the shoulder movement has nothing to do with women having a chip on their shoulders is disingenuous to say the least. (In case you didn't notice feminism needs unhappy women. If women are content with what they h…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/14 10:22 PM
0

You cite someone (No Maam) who himself is unrelated to RP and who cites someone else (William James) from freakin' 1890, saying something vaguely similar to something you want to prove... I'm not sold yet. The real problem is that you want to prove that we are mysygynysts, and you reframe anything you find to mean something completely different than what it was supposed to mean. Whisper already explained the RP viewpoint: RP states that you should lead your woman because women respond positively…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/14 09:51 PM
2

The "facts" you use to explain your strategy are highly objectionable and mostly false. You remind me of the Stig, who knows only two facts about ducks, and both of them are wrong. It's mindblowing how you say with confidence that "RP facts" are false after demonstrating that you know nothing about RP. RP states that women should be lead because they aren't as capable No it doesn't. And it's not a "pissing match" if you lie about something and people who know more about it correct you. Saying ot…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/14 07:30 PM
2

Now that we're citing statistics you surely know that women were a lot happier in the 50's, when everything was soooo patriarchal. It is a statistical fact that women's happiness declined with the rise of ekvalitee and feminism, and for some strange reason I doubt that the solution would be even more feminism. And I call BS on both of your statements. I very much doubt that husbands are so much happier than wives, precisely because "when mom's happy, everyone is happy" is so ingrained in the zei…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/14 07:14 PM
2

This made me laugh out loud, thank you.
/r/MensRights19/01/14 09:53 AM
3

As of now, there are 3 MR-related posts on the hot page. We're doomed.
/r/TheRedPill17/01/14 12:58 PM
2

Depends on what you mean. The original feminist bullshit is childish, yeah. It shows a black & white, men are evil / women are victims mentality. The real paradox is that it suggests that men don't get blamed for anything... Meanwhile it puts 100% of the blame on men.
/r/MensRights17/01/14 12:41 PM
4

This is the most meaningless shit because it's not reliable, it does not actually protect you, just lowers the cance of infection. Are you willing to bet your life on this? Would you be willing to cut your dick as an adult for this "benefit"? You still can't have unprotected sex with someone with HIV, because "a lower chance" of infection is still not zero. And if you use condoms it's irrelvant.
/r/TheRedPill16/01/14 08:57 PM
52

he doesn’t have to constantly be the sexism police of every aspect of everything he encounters. He should leave that to female feminists, right? He is danger of becoming a mansplainer. He practically just echoes her - so much for mansplaining. "My son, if you repeat what I have said at other times you're oprressing me with your mansplaining!" It should of course be completely evident to anyone with half a brain that feminists use the word "sexism" to mean whatever the fuck they want it to. The o…
/r/MensRights13/01/14 09:48 AM
1

As others have said it: nope. You should be able to call anyone anything, because freedom of speech. If they take offense, let them. People have to learn the wisdom of Anthony De Mello's words: If it is peace you want, seek to change yourself, not other people. It is easier to protect your feet with slippers than to carpet the whole of the earth.
/r/MensRights13/01/14 09:27 AM
3

The saddest part is that he's perfectly right. If you find out that the child abducting protection services are after your child, flee while you can, because you can't expect any form of fairness or justice. They can destroy families on personal whims, and they often do. This is the state of things in the west right now. The state is getting more and more powers while the citizens have less and less every day. The only question is: where can you go? It seems it won't take too long till we run ou…
/r/MensRights13/01/14 09:18 AM
1

(Assuming this is not a hoax,which I think it is,) her hands will probably never rock any cradles. She will be used as long as she can produce money for a company, and then discarded like a man. You go grrrl!
/r/MensRights13/01/14 08:15 AM
2

I totally understand that from a legal point of view you are right. I knew that before writing my comment. But for the sake of the fuckin heavens, isn't it really time we start to do what is right instead of what is "smart"? Men get accused, follow their lawyers' advice, and get imprisoned anyways every day. Does anybody have the balls to fuckin' stand up and yell to their faces that we won't let ourselves be bullied anymore?! Silencing us is one of their main weapons and it boils my blood to se…
/r/MensRights10/01/14 06:41 PM
0

If he's innocent publicity can only serve his case. Of course judges can force him to shut up or punish him for speaking up but I reckon it's time for us to stop playing by their rules. We went along for decades and look where it got us. He should publicize (or "leak") every detail of his story everywhere he can to ensure that people learn about the atrocities in our so-called justice system. The same publicity could also save him from getting quitely swept under the rug with a prison sentence, …
/r/MensRights10/01/14 09:40 AM
2

She just proved that feminists only care about women.
/r/MensRights10/01/14 09:29 AM
37

LOL, this would mean that the listener can define what the speaker meant, which is bullshit. If you think he meant something which he didn't, that's called misunderstanding, or intentionally misconstruing his words.
/r/MensRights10/01/14 08:48 AM
3

how should I feel about this guy That's a strange question considering you already feel some way about him :) Do whatever you feel is right, you don't need justification from outside sources. If he's an asshole you have every right to cut ties. You could go about it the passive-agressive way 95% of all people choose: simply don't return his calls and don't talk to him. If you have more spine than 95% of people you could talk to him about it, preferrably asking him to honestly tell his version of…
/r/MensRights07/01/14 01:21 PM
1

Okay, that's a clearer picture but I still say it's up to her discretion if she wants to escalate things or to forget it. It's up to her (and not you) to decide if she was hurt enough to destroy his life in return. On a side note, it's a clearcut he said / she said situation and he will most probably walk free regardless of what actually happened (and he should because innocent until proven guilty is a pillar of our justice system), so reporting this to the police would only serve to waste unhol…
/r/MensRights07/01/14 12:43 PM
-1

It's business as usual when feminists complain on the internet that they are chased out of the internet... Like when a female politician complains that females are not allowed in politics or a Fortune500 businesswoman complains about the glass ceiling. Anyways, trolling is not limited to females, duh. Pure bullshit, as par for the feminist course.
/r/MensRights07/01/14 12:12 PM
3

If she was able to stop it with a slap then it was not "assault". Think about it for fuck's sake. He stopped his advances when he realized (in his state of drunkenness) that said advances were unwanted. Had he continued, that would have been assault. Anyways, you should do exactly what your friend asked you to do. Did she ask you to report anything to the police? If not, then don't. Spreading false allegations is a shitty thing to do, by the way.
/r/MensRights07/01/14 12:03 PM
3

What should I do? Erhm, nothing? Guy came unto a girl who refused his advances and nothing happened. No actual crime was committed, and even if there was, those involved should figure out what to do about it. It's not the business of outsiders to intervene based on hearsay.
/r/MensRights07/01/14 11:30 AM
1

Feminists have trumpeted up this hysteria for every major football/soccer event in the past ~15 years and it was debunked every. single. time. The police did its best everywhere but still failed to produce a single trafficked and/or underage prostitute. It's complete, total, utter bullshit, so no wonder feminists keep on spewing it.
/r/MensRights07/01/14 10:02 AM
1

do you mean to say that these are the "truths" No. But I have already stated this a couple of times, for example here: Also RPers don't present basic dating 101 stuff like it's the holy grail or something. If I use simple examples it's only for the sake of clarity :)
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/14 09:17 AM
1

Part 2. you don't have to consciously hate people to be a bigot This is the most blatant weapon to smear anyone. There are absolutely no objective conditions to be met for someone to be called a bigot, it is decided by the word of a certain political group which likes to swing this branding iron around its political enemies. To be blunt, for a liberal every non-liberal is a bigot. This is why this phrase is meaningless nowadays. society's longstanding prejudices which would account for certain g…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/14 04:18 PM
1

For the sake of lucidity I answer your points in a different order. If you need averages to reach the most basic of conclusions It seems you think there are no more rules to dating than a handful of basics like wash yourself and keep smiling. There are deeper things to understand which will help a man be successful with women, and RP is a collection of this knowledge. It does not calculate anything, it is built on the shared observations of thousands of living, breathing men. It does not use "av…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/14 04:18 PM
1

I never thought of anime in terms of TRP, but, come to think of it, Tengen Toppa Gurren Lagann has an interesting protagonist :) Also, most of the samurai-themed animes have an abundance of alphas (not talking about the samurai girl variants, obviously). Champloo, Samurai Seven and Gifuu Doudou comes to mind, but there are dozens of others. Not so much for the example of alphaness, but if you liked Cowboy Bebop you'll probably like Trigun too, if you give it some time to build up. Also, a few ra…
/r/TheRedPill02/01/14 01:03 PM
1

This is so much ado about nothing. Who the f_ck cares if someone calles him/herself a gamer, thinks there is or isn't a gaming community, or that this supposed community does or does not readily internalize feminist propaganda? It's nothing more than feminist hysteria about there being a facet of life not under their totalitarian control. I play games all the time and could give a rats ass about some PC liberal idiots having a hissy fit about where "the community" is headed. Also it is quite app…
/r/MensRights02/01/14 12:21 PM
2

Women couldn't vote, couldn't get educated, and couldn't do many things. Which is also perfectly true for most men, historically speaking. Voting and widespread education are relatively new ideas, and women were let in on the fun as soon as they asked to be. The global average difference for giving voting rights to men and women is 10 years (boo fuckin' hoo), and then we should consider that men had to fight for their country to earn their voting right while women got it for free. Also, women co…
/r/MensRights02/01/14 12:06 PM
1

There is no composite woman made up of the most common female traits walking around your nearby bar! I wonder what you mean by "the most common female traits", because if you imply what I think you imply you have just defeated your own argument. there are still far more women who deviate from the norm in some manner than imbibe it in every way First of all, the biggest fallacy here is implying that a woman should represent the average in every way for others to be able to make predictions about …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/14 10:06 AM
1

What bothers me (not really but still) is that most people are too dense to understand the message... They refuse accepting money and instead play with dogshit because that gives their egos more pleasure. For example what you get out this conversation is a vague sense of an ego boost coming from the notion that 2 or 3 people will read this conversation and think you're cool because of your one-liners. They might even think you have "won"!!! Big fuckin' deal, be my guest, I'll upvote you if it ma…
/r/TheRedPill13/12/13 11:10 AM
3

Could care less if I offend someone's delicate sensibilities. I thought we were adult people having a conversation. I know that answering "LOL, you're hilarious." to an actual argument can seem alpha, because it's a dickhead move, but I think I already stated somewhere around here that I don't give a rats ass about status - especially on the internet, where it matters even less. I'm here to have interesting conversations and possibly to learn new stuff. "LOL, you're hilarious." is neither of tho…
/r/TheRedPill13/12/13 10:39 AM
3

What's hilarious is wasting my time trying to reason with a certain kind of people. I find it rather simplistic (I try to be diplomatic here) if someone thinks that "red pill = ditch the bitch", and everything else is bluepill. All I'm saying is that your goals should define your actions, but it seems it's still too much to understand for some.
/r/TheRedPill13/12/13 10:27 AM
0

I don't know what gave you the stupid idea that I would give the same advice under different circumstances. We're not talking about a girl who steals money, we're talking about someone who had some rough sex somewhere in the past. Then again, if she is doing anything you've listed but you still enjoy being with her, where's the problem? If she is doing something that's a big no-no for you, obviously you won't enjoy being with her, so my advice won't force you to stay with a chick whose actions y…
/r/TheRedPill13/12/13 07:37 AM
0

I believe I am my net worth :) And I could give a rats ass about status. I think there's a defect in the way some people think - but of course everybody is entitled to think any way they want, so, be my guest. I'm talking about when people lose sight of their original goals and somehow the methods they have equipped to reach those goals supersede the goals themselves. To be more exact, most guys want sex and fun. They realize (thanks to TRP) that to have sex and fun they have to rise in the stat…
/r/TheRedPill12/12/13 01:22 PM
1

Haha, very funny. I'm sure you only associate with virgins, even if you just want a one night stand. Good for you. Maybe you didn't notice but I have explicitly stated that if he wants anything serious he should next her.
/r/TheRedPill12/12/13 01:09 PM
-1

You should be a bit less calculating in your relationships. The only relevant question is do you enjoy being with her? If yes, continue enjoying it for f_ck's sake. Don't let theories ruin something fun. To continue this train of thought, the next question is what are your goals for the near future? If you want a wife and kids, you should look for another woman. If you want to enjoy your life as it is, it would be a stupid mistake to kick this girl to the curb.
/r/TheRedPill11/12/13 09:09 AM
1

If we "take ownership of our own movement", the MRM will become a loose collection of micromovements with even more infighting. It's hard to see what would serve our purposes better but I think we should try to unite under one banner to the extent that it's possible. Even if we disagree on many things, infigthing and fracturing our own resources only serves our ideological enemies. Divide and conquer. We should not give feminists the pleasure of dividing ourselves based on inconsequential rhetor…
/r/MensRights11/12/13 08:55 AM
6

This is pure bullshit, par for the course. A woman can be a good boss, but too many of them confuse intellect with arrogance, humor with rudeness, etc. And this happens thanks to feminism, which made women think they have to compete with men in everything at all times. Many women feel an insatiable need to prove their superiority over men, and this is exactly why they are bossy, pushy, etc. It's not some flawed perception or an ancient stereotype, it's reality. The second half of the video is ev…
/r/MensRights11/12/13 08:01 AM
1

Is it just some bullshit circlejerk where they put everyone down? Yes.
/r/MensRights10/12/13 01:39 PM
10

Your entire response could be reflected back at you in equal measure. That sounds awfully convincing coming from a virgin pondering suicide, targeted at a family man with a happy life. I tried to help you but apparently you don't want me to, and since I get nothing out of this conversation, I bid you farewell.
/r/TheRedPill10/12/13 01:34 PM
14

Look, you'll get nowhere if you just want to prove that you know everything better than anyone else. Lose the pseudo-intellectual superiority complex and we can have a conversation. I'm much too old to have the patience to help someone who thinks he's morally superior to me just because he still believes the politically correct anti-male propaganda. If you don't recognize that you have a problem and that the solution is to change the way you think then this is just a waste of time.
/r/TheRedPill10/12/13 12:22 PM
41

...assuming you're not a troll... LOL Nice set of stupid stereotypes, fella. The problem is in your head, but you could sort it out in a matter of months if you'd just realize that what you protect so hard as your "moral code" is a bunch of bullshit instilled in you by the media. But to return to the stupid stereotypes, your head is full of them regarding what an alpha, or the red pill, is. I view the way that alphas act to be kind of disgusting honestly. The tricks, tips and mindset to be gener…
/r/TheRedPill10/12/13 08:36 AM
1

I hate signing in to accounts just to comment on blogs (maybe you should allow anonymous comments) so I reply here: It's impossible. A handful of people could cooperate meaningfully but thousands can't. Nobody has control over what other MRAs say or do. But it produces more positive results than negative. The MRM is getting richer every day with new ideas, insights and viewpoints. Inevitably some bad apples fall on our heads, but we're still lightyears ahead of feminists.
/r/MensRights10/12/13 07:40 AM
4

Yep. Feminism does not fight the system because it is the system. The leaders of the UN, the governments of the US and EU, etc. are all feminists. Where is the so-called patriarchy they fight against? We just lead the world, we don't have any power, it's teh patriarkee!
/r/MensRights09/12/13 07:02 AM
0

Rape is about sex. All rapists get sexual pleasure out of raping other people, regardless of who penetrates who with what. I have never heard of a single case of rape where the rapist thought or said that s/he did not get any sexual pleasure from the act, s/he just did it "for power". Try to imagine for example a guy without any sexual lust raping a woman and whispering into her ear that "see, now I have control over you". This just does not add up. How would you even get an erection without sex…
/r/MensRights03/12/13 02:00 PM
3

I bet most soldiers rape because they haven't had sex in months (or years), and some of them are certainly agressive sociopaths (war tends to attract the type), but none of them rape because power. The same is true for prisons. You won't fuck a man up the ass just to prove that you're the dominant guy... Do I have to explain this??? But then again, we don't talk about wars, we talk about rape. Some of it is fueled by hatred (mostly racial), but it is always sexual. Rape is about sex. Sex is both…
/r/MensRights03/12/13 09:04 AM
3

Which is the same bullshit.
/r/MensRights03/12/13 07:48 AM
4

Yep, that's the basic suggestion for kids. If you're an adult, you might also try to use your brain for a change. Women live longer than men in the civilized world, so there are literally millions of widows out there, many of them quite rich - inane bullshit like "women own less than 1% of the world's property" should immediately raise a huge flag, with or without "sources". These are nothing more than misandric lies of feminist propaganda.
/r/MensRights29/11/13 09:04 AM
3

If you need a source to see that this is obvious bullshit there's something wrong with you.
/r/MensRights29/11/13 07:51 AM
5

She said she hoped the specialist prosecutors would drive up conviction rates for sex offences. So their goal is not finding out the truth, but imprisoning more men. And they call that a justice system? Weird.
/r/MensRights27/11/13 09:50 AM
3

And they are too stupid to realize that their own hate is the best proof that their feminist propaganda is bullshit. The fact that you guys spent your precious time on writing male-bashing articles is proof positive that male-bashing is in fact rampant, and that we should take steps to stop it. There is so much hate out there targeted at men, it's mindblowing.
/r/MensRights21/11/13 01:12 PM
25

They grasp the idea perfectly well, they just don't want to lose the free money.
/r/MensRights21/11/13 01:06 PM
1

The linked document was presented and discussed in the EU's LIBE committee on the 17th of september this year. I wouldn't say it's "old". Please link to anything saying this measure have failed because I can't seem to find anything on this.
/r/TheRedPill19/11/13 12:15 PM
1

We are under the rule of the same bankster elite, so it would be daft to expect different political outcomes. The US and the EU are going in the same cultural marxist direction. The only difference is that americans are stupid while europeans are snobs. Same difference, really. (I have just realized that most people don't understand what "same difference" actually means. There are even flawed definitions floating around. Here's a good one. And this makes it fairly obvious that I'm from Europe :)
/r/TheRedPill19/11/13 11:53 AM
3

The writer states in the first paragraphs that "innocent until proven guilty" is a flawed notion and should be done away with. I could not force myself to read on.
/r/MensRights19/11/13 08:52 AM
9

The McGill Daily - Shock journalism since 1911 This article is indeed quite shocking. Stop linking to professional trolls, please.
/r/MensRights19/11/13 07:40 AM
11

Funny how women don't dress for men, but at the same time are pressured by the unrealistic beauty standards of men, according to feminist logic.
/r/MensRights19/11/13 07:26 AM
2

A fantastic article, thank you. (With the minuscule exception of the quote mentioning the "One in four women sexual assaulted" bullshit.)
/r/MensRights15/11/13 08:45 AM
5

Of course they moderate comments :) Mine went like this, I don't expect to see it there: Oh, those poor girls, victims of rape and patriarchal attacks - this would sound horrible, right? But of course demeaning and dismissing men is fine. So what if someone accused you of rape and your family and your life is destroyed? Suck it up bum, and don't dare talk about it unless you want me to mock you relentlessly. "But don't feel bad if you've never even heard the word before, because the dictionary a…
/r/MensRights15/11/13 07:43 AM
10

Suck it up and deal with it. This would sound a bit less ironic if we weren't talking about a billionaire lifestyle... Ah teh poor wymyn, facing the hardships of having a husband 99% of women would kill for :| The lesson here is that no matter what you do and who you are, you can not possibly be "good enough" to a great many women. Conclusion: stop trying. (And get rid of people in your life who are like this).
/r/MensRights15/11/13 07:26 AM
1

Tell me, am I crazy? Well, you're kinda' crazy for asking this: I'm a woman, am I allowed to post here? Apart from that you seem fine.
/r/MensRights14/11/13 12:07 PM
12

Exclusively talking about FGM is kinda' sexist, you see, because it focuses on one sex and ignores the other in the case of a problem that affects both. just don't interrupt discussions of FGM What you're saying equates to "let them have their sexist little club where they treat girls as priceless and boys as worthless". But you know what, we will immediately stop "interrupting their discussions" when the following criteria are met: They stop interrupting ours'. Our issues get the same media cov…
/r/MensRights14/11/13 09:00 AM
4

Yeah, if you wade through a ton of shit you might find a consolation prize at the bottom. I always find it funny when feminists pretend to be impartial journalists and write about the MRM like we're just a bunch of women-hating lunatics. Some of them started to act like they might throw us a bone, but I won't sell my integrity for meaningless feminist-friendly rhetorical bullshit just because somewhere in it she mentions that perhaps we might have one or two legitimate issues. If we'd just accep…
/r/MensRights13/11/13 08:43 AM
0

Fine, but then I don't quite get what you wanted to convey with all this. Pointing out that some quotes are falsely attributed or misquoted is perfectly okay. But your other arguments are just vague attempts at demanding impartiality and/or good faith towards feminists (let's slip some misandry through because it's fiction, humor, taken out of context, whatever), which is way too much to ask since we all know these people were/are very active and influential menhaters. For all intents and purpos…
/r/MensRights12/11/13 01:18 PM
0

what is important here is whether she's made an impact on feminism and misandry worthy of being quoted as such Considering she's already often quoted on this subject I dare say her "contribution" is significant, at least to the point that it merits quoting. I know it's a circular argument of sorts but it works this time :) She is already a part of our pop culture and quoting her is justified by her status. Many people look(ed) up to her, so she's in a position to influence the masses, so to spea…
/r/MensRights12/11/13 01:16 PM
2

I've deleted this comment right after posting it because I realized you already wrote about Sharon Stone's affiliation (or the lack of) in your article. A small wonder you were fast enough to react :) Regarding your answer, it's not that easy. In this context it was you who made a claim, I just asked you to prove it. I have nothing to do with the quotes you analyze, so I don't feel compelled to defend them or those people who have used them for whatever purposes. Then again, proving that someone…
/r/MensRights12/11/13 11:01 AM
0

You know, there's a world of difference between "deconstructing" Einstein's theory of E=mc2 into radical feminist gibberish, and realizing that "The male—I have found—is a domestic animal which, if treated with firmness and kindness, can be trained to do most things." is a misandrist joke. If you don't see the difference between the two please don't reply, you'd just destroy my belief in the sanity of humankind.
/r/MensRights12/11/13 09:03 AM
2

Frankly, no. The "work of fiction" excuse is a pretty dumb one, because political activists writing about their fields of interest is never really "fiction". I bet if a KKK member would write a book in which the main protagonist would say that "niggers are not humans, they're monkeys" you would be offended to the hilt and wouldn't let it slip with a simple "it's fiction". This is the same - radical feminists with an apparent hatred for men write that they want to see men (who are all rapists) be…
/r/MensRights12/11/13 08:54 AM
16

This is misandrist bullshit, pure hatred at its worst. Don't take it at face value or it will taint you.
/r/MensRights11/11/13 09:58 PM
1

According to feminists and the law, drunk girls "can't consent", but they often do, and the law punishes the man she had sex with for it. Drunken sex -> no consent -> rape.
/r/MensRights11/11/13 07:22 AM
0

drunk people can't consent Drunk people can't drive either, but they do. And the law punishes them for it. Drunk people can't consent, but they do. And you can't punish others for it.
/r/MensRights08/11/13 09:42 AM
2

Not much to understand here. They lie, and some of them know this perfectly well. The rest are idiots. But if they admit their "stats" are made up, they have nothing to stand on. They would have to pack their things and go home, and hang their heads in shame because they were either lying menhaters or dumb menhaters.
/r/MensRights08/11/13 08:52 AM
3

They conflate actual paid work with housework, and then they discard many things men do for their families. Just like others have said around here: washing the dishes is considered work but mowing the lawn isn't. Simple feminist bullshit. Men do a lot more hours of paid work, and that is a hard statistic, unlike this shit.
/r/MensRights08/11/13 08:39 AM
1

I don't know if they actually want to ban them, but if they do, let them. They will go out of business in weeks.
/r/TheRedPill07/11/13 09:10 AM
1

Where one pair of parents saw innocent drawings of ninjas and soldiers, school administrators reportedly saw disturbing and threatening images. If you are "threatened" by a ninja drawn by an 8yo you should resign immediately and never again work around children.
/r/MensRights07/11/13 08:42 AM
0

One of the reasons same-sex partner violence is swept under the rug is that statistics clearly show that lesbians commit more violence than gays. And feminists can't let that fact be known by the public. Even this article tried to focus on gay violence but if you look at the statistical data from the CDC it shows that lesbians are worse.
/r/MensRights07/11/13 08:39 AM
2

back that statement up with something solid or we're going to be accused of sensationalism But if he cites a study all feminists will immediately admit he's right. Right?
/r/MensRights07/11/13 08:27 AM
1

If you want help from a shelter where your abusive ex works you must not be the brightest guy around there. Your story doesn't quite add up.
/r/MensRights07/11/13 08:22 AM
7

Let's summarize this new version of the 10 commandments for feminist men: Shut the fuck up! Be prepared to be (rightfully!) abused by female feminists! Submit to us and force other men to do the same! What a fine proposition, that is. I feel so excited for male feminists.
/r/MensRights07/11/13 08:13 AM
5

It's nothing more than cleverly phrased feminist propaganda, implying that men and wome are exactly the same, but society is patriarchal, ie. mysygynystyc. This is stupid. Most of these "observations" (actually feminist counter-stereotypes) were outdated decades ago. Do I have to explain that if you look out the window, the world you see there does not deem women weak or dumb? We live in the age of grrrl power, for cryin' out loud. Turn on the TV, you'll see men portrayed as dumb and women portr…
/r/MensRights07/11/13 07:50 AM
1

We agree to disagree. I ultimately think that's fine. Well, waddaya know... Maybe I was rougher than I should have been. May I suggest you read this article?
/r/TheRedPill06/11/13 03:54 PM
1

The original article is from John Ross, ie. "Ross in Range". He has many interesting articles, worth browsing his archives for.
/r/TheRedPill06/11/13 11:32 AM
2

You assume you know what I despise. First of all it was a general you, referring to western women. But then again, well, duh. I assume you're like the other 95% of women. You could be an outlier, but then what? You're an outlier. Thinking your instincts don't really affect you because you are "enlightened" or progressive is one of the biggest and most arrogant delusions of our modern age. I would argue women escapes your fragile ego Wut it came less acceptable for a man to exert his physical str…
/r/TheRedPill06/11/13 11:22 AM
2

This is a false argument because even if men and women pay the same price, they receive different benefits. Here is one example. Here's another. So, it's business as usual for the feminist propaganda machine.
/r/MensRights06/11/13 08:50 AM
9

Except it doesn't degrade the appearance or function. Except it does, if we accept that pleasure is a function of sex, which it is. Many people prefer the appearance of a circumcised penis. Who the fuck cares??? It's the stupidest non-argument ever. If african men prefer the appearance of a cut labia then female circumcision is justified? Retards who think their opinions about the appearance of a guy's penis matter more than his own right to his own bodily integrity should be educated out of the…
/r/MensRights06/11/13 08:36 AM
10

Apart from all the other good counterarguments listed here, I must say the original point can't be any mooter because we do teach men not to rape. To say otherwise shows severe ignorance and retardedness.
/r/MensRights06/11/13 08:23 AM
1

I think men assume women don't have egos Nope. We know that your instincts work against your own ego - there lies the problem. Western women's egos are so inflated, they want to control everything, but if they succeed, they become unhappy. It's an uphill battle for men, trying to find ways to lead while avoiding blowing up women's fragile egos. (Contrary to feminist propaganda, it's women whose egos are fragile. Boys learn they are worthless compared to girls by age 6.) However in life, there ar…
/r/TheRedPill06/11/13 07:27 AM
2

Or do they believe that men and women are on the same level You'll have a hard time understanding others' answers to this question :) Men and women have the same "worth" as human beings. They are equal in the eyes of God, so to speak. But they differ in many ways, and this creates a whole lot of problems for the equalist crowd. For example most women lust after men better than themselves [hypergamy], so a relationship can only be stable if the woman continually perceives the man to be better tha…
/r/TheRedPill05/11/13 09:54 AM
1

You seem to misunderstand something. RPers don't want women to be chaste. We don't want women to be anything - you are totally, absolutely free to be yourself. You can be picky, you can be slutty, be our guest. But know that people - every last one, including us and your gradma too - base their decisions about you on what they know about you. It is their right to do so, and also it is your right to do the same to them. It is your prerogative to say that you want handsome guys for flings, but pol…
/r/TheRedPill05/11/13 09:30 AM
6

Everyone is entitled to do what s/he wants. TRPers would never want to take away any rights from anyone to do anything s/he wants. If you want to slut it up, you are free to do so, in fact many RPers will cheer you on. What you can't do is demand that they change their ways of choosing who to associate with. If a guy does not want to marry a slut, it's his prerogative, and nobody should try to shame him into doing it against his will. Saying that men should not base their decisions about who to …
/r/TheRedPill05/11/13 09:15 AM
0

Common sense FTW.
/r/MensRights05/11/13 07:34 AM
4

Yeah, Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama are only fringe lunatics and selfish idiots. You believe in something that is entirely false. Having good faith or good intentions does not help in this case - sort out the facts first. After you realize that radical feminism is the mainstream, things will 'click'.
/r/MensRights04/11/13 08:36 AM
5

list the main contributing factors to this phenomenon Is this homework or something? :) You might try to be a bit more polite next time, or at least sound less like a public school teacher. One contributing factor is that men with families work harder. If you have no responsibilities, you might choose an easier job with lower pay, or give the finger to an especially horrible boss - if your kid is hungry, you can't. Also, Unkleman is right in that poor guys are less likely to be married.
/r/MensRights04/11/13 08:23 AM
3

So we must refrain from pointing out obvious truths in case it might hurt some wymyn's ego? Bad, bad MRM. To all these idiots posting here, please look out your window and show me just ONE building built by women. It's not these guys' fault that you can't distinguish "don't build" from "can't build". Also it's not their fault if you don't believe in simple scientific facts, like men's brains are more suited for some tasks than women's. But of course if someone says women have better verbal capab…
/r/MensRights04/11/13 07:57 AM
1

I am very sorry for you if you need sources for things immediately apparent to anyone with half a brain. Also please tell me how one supposed to provide sources for personal observations not discussed in academia? And also please tell me why we would need legitimatization from academia which is heavily leftist-feminist? If you need the written authorization of someone in a lab coat to recognize plain truth your opinion is worthless. And all this is true even if the post exaggerates somewhat wrt …
/r/MensRights30/10/13 10:11 AM
1

degrades women by portraying them as weak Weak, as in cutting robots in half with a sword, or singlehandedly defeating hundreds of nazi zombie men? Fuck me if that's "weak". But let's look at this question from a wider viewpoint. Even in reality there exist people who are weak, and people who are strong. It is not realistic to expect the whole entertainment industry to cater to a narrow (feminist) consumer group, and only ever portray one type of women (strong, independent, you know the drill) f…
/r/MensRights29/10/13 07:48 AM
1

I didn't mean you should write short sentences, just shorter than that monster :) As a fellow RPer, I'd say that writing style comes across a bit like you think if you pause for a moment somebody will interrupt you. You have many things to say, that much is obvious, but you don't need to say it all at once, in one giant sentence. That's like a written form of jabbering. But of course it's your business completely, I don't want to force my opinions onto you, especially since the content of your w…
/r/TheRedPill28/10/13 12:08 PM
2

Don't be afraid to make your own decisions. Guys here tend to always vote negative, take that into account when weighing their opinions. The "red flags" you mentioned are insignificant, I'd say if these are her biggest flaws she's better than 90% of western women out there. Things will get real when she leaves school, because then she will start to think about having children, and an "oops" pregnancy could make things a lot harder for you. If you yourself don't also want children by then, that i…
/r/TheRedPill28/10/13 11:50 AM
6

It's not about "deserving", it's about honesty. It is absolutely her prerogative to talk about what she wants to do with her life. And it's his prerogative to decide if he wants to be a part of that or not. But intentionally fucking things up for her can't be retroactively justified by saying "she didn't deserve a marriage anyways".
/r/TheRedPill28/10/13 11:41 AM
1

How do you keep your emotions from creeping into this, maintain detachment I don't think you should. It makes you less human. Deal with them instead of suppressing. Believe it or not, the ultimate goal of the red pill is happiness, which involves having good emotions.
/r/TheRedPill28/10/13 11:32 AM
2

Call me a pragmatist bastard but I have the same feelings about her that I've mentioned when you were talking about your beta friend: if people like her don't find a partner, all the better for catfood companies, right? If you're so lost in your own entitlement complex that you think nobody's good enough for you, well, good riddance. She shouldn't ruin decent men's lives by "settling down" for one.
/r/TheRedPill28/10/13 11:21 AM
2

Your female friend is a victim of her own hypergamy, this is one of the reasons so many people argue here women being in high powered jobs is a bad thing, they refuse to date down and provide for men, their love is always conditional that the man be better than them, they find it incredibly difficult to respect a man who isn't doing equally as well if not better than them in life and therefore by being so well accomplished she has essentially limited her own dating options. A word of advice, if …
/r/TheRedPill28/10/13 11:16 AM
3

However, he can't get anywhere with women. He is the dude who shows up at the feminist rally to show off what a great supporter he is by wearing flip-flops, an untucked t-shirt reading "I need feminism because rape culture" I am very sorry to tell you but I hope that guys like him stay unsuccessful with women, because thank god if they don't taint the genepool of the next generation. Fuck these know-nothing liberal asshats who make this world so hard to live in for sane people. He should sort ou…
/r/TheRedPill28/10/13 11:10 AM
3

It has nothing to do with anything MR or feminism. It was a movie, ie. entertainment. If you like action movies with lots of CGI you might give it a try, otherwise don't. Nobody forces anyone to watch it so it's not a political question.
/r/MensRights28/10/13 10:12 AM
2

upvote for the lolz
/r/TheRedPill28/10/13 09:43 AM
11

This is mindblowingly ridiculous. There is no wage gap, and if there's one, it favors women. Look up FACTS for fucking love's sake. What about rape? What the freakin' fuck about rape? What rights do men have about rape that women don't? Did you even understand the question? Detto. I must say women have way more rights regarding rape and harassment than men, so you scored an own goal. they say they want equal rights Yeah, because they have the mental capacity of prematurely born oysters, and don'…
/r/TheRedPill24/10/13 08:43 AM
15

Let's not forget that early feminism played an important role in liberating women from forced servitude under their husbands It seems you know nothing about actual history, you just bought the feminist propaganda hook, line and whatnot. Forced servitude my ass. It was always men who worked way more. Look at actual history books or even paintings for fuck's sake. I wonder how this bullshit comment received so many upvotes... Bluepill brigading maybe? edit: And one more thing, "centrist" is a mean…
/r/TheRedPill24/10/13 08:32 AM
9

full of people like this cunt seeking to justify rape. If I knew how to unsubscribe on my phone I would be out of here Yeah, because saying forcibly raping someone at knifepoint is not the same thing as two teens having drunken sex with each other is "justifying rape", right? Don't let the door hit your ass on your way out...
/r/MensRights17/10/13 12:45 PM
3

The statutory rape segment is especially disingenuous considering the cases where women raped underage boys and not only did the women get full custody of the children, the boys even have to pay child support. If that's not fucked up I don't know what is.
/r/MensRights11/10/13 06:53 AM
1

I concur wholeheartedly. First of all when MRAs talk about how legions of men get raped by women, outsiders get the impression that we're a bunch of whining lunatics. Widespread rape of men is not happening, and even though it does happen to a smaller extent, talking about it to outsiders is like talking about the tooth fairy. They will only think we're nuts. Second of all we should not adopt a feminine victim-mentality. If we ask for help from the government we give our own power to it for free…
/r/MensRights10/10/13 10:46 AM
5

If the love of your life had more than a few partners you'd give up that relationship? Yes, because I reserve the right to have moral standards. And trying to shame me because my moral standards are higher than yours is a strange idea to say the least. All this slut-shaming nonsense is about lowlifes trying to force their low morals on better people. They try to counter-shame those who rightfully shame them for being immoral, but it only works in retarded cultural marxist circles. Most guys stil…
/r/TheRedPill08/10/13 11:09 AM
10

Despite this obvious disjunct between the intended use of the offence and its operation in practice, the abolition of defensive homicide is met with concerns that its removal may disadvantage female defendants. So, let me get this clear. They have created a law specifically to help women. It did help some women, but it also helped some men. That it helped some men was deemed so much of a problem that they now consider abolishing it despite that this abolishment will supposedly be bad for women. …
/r/MensRights04/10/13 07:06 AM
25

Saying that men can stop rape is like telling a driver they can stop all car accidents Yep, this article is a goldmine for great quotes.
/r/MensRights30/09/13 07:52 AM
1

No matter how you look at it it's still bullshit. I don't even buy that 1 in 4 women are sexually assaulted in their life. At best (or worst) I might be willing to accept a 1 in 10 but even that seems unreasonable. Sensible studies place the rate of women sexually assaulted in their lifetime at about 1 in 40 if I remember correctly.
/r/MensRights21/09/13 08:54 AM
1

Then it is quite clear that you're not "intimidated by their IQ" but annoyed by their arrogance. There's a difference between being smart and being a constant pain in the ass. And let me tell you, if someone is a constant pain in the ass it shows that she isn't that smart.
/r/MensRights21/09/13 08:47 AM
4

I can't even imagine how the writers at onion laugh when they read the feminist response :)
/r/MensRights20/09/13 07:33 AM
11

The joke of the article is not that its actually women who are like this, the joke is that this guy is nowhere near as smart as he thinks he is. You know the double (triple?) joke on you is that women who say men are intimidated by their intellect are also nowhere near as smart as they think they are. (The onion satirizes this perfectly by placing these stupid women's words in this imaginary guys' mouth verbatim.) If you have at least the IQ of a well-bred dog you immediately recognise that this…
/r/MensRights20/09/13 07:30 AM
3

On a side note, I find it funny that I have never met a man who said he is intimidated by women's intellect. It is always women, and I dare say it's always feminist women who say that men are intimidated by them. Which is nothing more than a shaming attempt and an empty boast, a kind of "hear me roar" grrrl power bullshit.
/r/MensRights20/09/13 07:20 AM
1

The overall intent of the article is fine but the writer takes the "1 in 4 women raped at universities" bullshit seriously, which is a big mistake. Don't ever base your conclusions on "feminist data".
/r/MensRights20/09/13 07:13 AM
2

Those are plain lies. You only need to know that ~90% of the homeless are men. What poverty are they talking about exactly?
/r/MensRights18/09/13 11:32 AM
2

These Uni officials are only protecting their own asses. Nobody could blame them for being too strict (and at the same time incredibly stupid) but they could be in trouble if they are too forgiving. So they take the safer choice and draft rules that are insane. From that point on it's not their responsibility - let others suffer while the officials sit safely in their chairs.
/r/MensRights18/09/13 11:21 AM
4

Ah, the good old "In Africa only blacks can be racists" argument.
/r/MensRights18/09/13 11:15 AM
15

Red Pill isn't actually the other side of the gender relations coin, but a group of hateful, militant extremists You know the group Femen? Yeah, the feminist group destroying christian monuments and disrupting various religious and sporting events. Their website have banners showing mutilated parts of men dripping with blood. Police have found a weapon and a grenade at their headquarters. Don't mind them, it's these guys at reddit, trying to understand women, who are the militant extremists.
/r/TheRedPill16/09/13 09:54 AM
6

A paternity test might still save him.
/r/TheRedPill16/09/13 08:24 AM
2

We live in a patriarchy that oppresses women and the perfect proof is that men are not allowed to have opinions. To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize. (Voltaire?)
/r/MensRights13/09/13 06:53 AM
1

If any male students at Yale still have their balls they should accuse feminists by the dozens.
/r/MensRights12/09/13 12:22 PM
-2

Hymowitz went full retard this time. Men write more wiki articles and are more than 70% of philosophers... Oh my f_ckin' god.
/r/MensRights05/09/13 06:53 AM
3

There's a huge difference between opposing left wing views and being right wing. The left wing, as it happens to exist nowadays, is nothing more than a cultural marxist machine designed to destroy western civilization. You can see it's working fine by examining the results: we dance towards the proverbial cliff and our downfall seems imminent. This can be thanked to the work of Gramsci, the Frankfurt School, Marcuse, and some other guys and groups you probably never heard of, but should have. Bu…
/r/TheRedPill30/08/13 08:02 AM
4

Dunno why this was downvoted, it's pretty much spot on.
/r/TheRedPill30/08/13 07:49 AM
7

little to no censorship You must be joking, right? The left is all for censorhip. Look at the feminist grip on facebook fcol. Political correctness is nothing more than a tool for censorship.
/r/TheRedPill30/08/13 07:45 AM
13

No, he's not "in the wrong". Or are we there yet? Can't people help each other? Can't people talk to each other? What he did was not wrong in any way. If someone finds offers of help patronizing then s/he's a butthurt assclown. But of course we live in a world where many women's primary weapon of choice for office politics is to accuse men of stupid shit, so you might want to protect your ass. Also, these people merit any kind of retaliation. They ruin other people's lives and careers.
/r/MensRights30/08/13 06:25 AM
1

Please enlighten me, to which group points 2-4 refer to? Because, as I'm sure you damn well know, outsiders say these same things about both MR and TRP. It's hilarious that one group parrots the same idiocy about the other.
/r/MensRights29/08/13 11:29 AM
63

Don't "convince" her, tell her straight up that for your kids involuntary circumcision is not an option. Grow a backbone for Christ's sake. Don't act like it's a reasonable debate, it's not. Mutilating a child just because others do it too is barbaric to say the least. I find it quite strange that in the west there are laws against cutting the ears and tails of dogs, because that's animal cruelty. But go on, cut your newborn's dick, that's fine.
/r/MensRights29/08/13 08:49 AM
1

Maybe if enough men left politicians would recognize that we need a better solution... Just a thought. Good luck with changing the laws though.
/r/MensRights27/08/13 12:37 PM
3

Yeah, I reckon who was born as a healthy male has nothing to do with it. They must have made this remark about his eyesight or something, it could not be a reference to him having a normal penis.
/r/MensRights27/08/13 12:35 PM
5

Evolutionally speaking women depend on men's resources, also meaning they depend on men's attention. Any one woman can only be sure of her man's investment in her as long as she has his attention all the time. This is why it's dangerous if her man goes out without her, let it be a guys' night out or a golf session. Everything guys do must be about women! OTOH women are often envious of men's accomplishments, the respect and status they have earned. What they forget is that these actually have to…
/r/MensRights27/08/13 08:02 AM
3

He was out of work for most of that time, a victim of a weak economy, and he ran through his savings trying to pay his wife alimony and child support that totaled almost $100,000 a year. “It’s a circle of hell there’s just no way out of,” Schochet said. “I paid it as long as I could.” His biggest mistake was trying to pay the CS+alimony at all. When he lost his job he should have bought a plane ticket to Asia or Africa and flee with all he had left. He could have started a decent new life instea…
/r/MensRights27/08/13 07:49 AM
3

Erhm, no. David Reimer (August 22, 1965 – May 5, 2004) was a Canadian man who was born as a healthy male, but was sexually reassigned and raised as female after his penis was accidentally destroyed during circumcision.
/r/MensRights27/08/13 07:39 AM
2

I get the impression those guys hate women. LOL, giving in to feminist propaganda so easily? "those guys hate women" my ass. They are realistic about them, meaning they kicked away the pedestal. Argh, the hate... Men - in a general, evolutionary sense - are strongly predisposed against hating women. The everpresent accusations of mysygyny are nothing more than a feminist ploy to silence opposition and vilify MRAs. Don't join in by spreading the same bullshit about other groups of men.
/r/MensRights16/08/13 08:56 AM
1

99% of all this is just wasting our times collectively. But then again, I never said I have no interest in what you say. I said my answer was not a point-by-point refutation, but an answer in a general, conversational sense. Sure, there are problems in the justice system. I never said no racism exists whatsoever. I believe that all races are equally racist, because there's this little thing called in-group bias, courtesy of our human evolution. But my opinion still stands that if the police want…
/r/MensRights16/08/13 07:05 AM
1

The problem is we are legitimizing his work by referring to it. And if feminists start spreading his other, not-so-correct "research findings" as facts coming from a guy approved by the MRM we're fucked. Also, I pretty much believe that although his ideas are a lot closer to the truth than other ideologues' ideas, he's still missing the mark significantly. His numbers are still too high. 3% of male university students admitting to commit multiple rapes? Come on, get the fuck out.
/r/MensRights15/08/13 05:02 PM
1

The police stopping people based on logic and experience is not "unequal enforcement of the law". Unequal enforcement would be letting white guys go with weed, guns or something. Which is not the case, at least officially. But the bigger problem is creating a clash between imaginary human rights and reality. The real problem is faking being offended by the police doing its job right. If you swim in the ocean and suddenly two creatures appear from nowhere, one is Nemo and the other is a shark, wh…
/r/MensRights15/08/13 04:55 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter