TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

DenimGod4lyfe Archive

View 3 posts and 48 comments by DenimGod4lyfe on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
420

FeminismDenimGod4lyfe/r/MensRights21/10/22 07:00 PM
150

progressDenimGod4lyfe/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/06/22 05:43 AM
91

GeneralDenimGod4lyfe/r/MensRights09/09/22 05:58 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-9

I'm an economist, and I feel forced to vote blue for economic reasons, despite the fact that that entire party and their policy hates me and discriminates against me for being a man. Rock and a hard place.
/r/MensRights11/10/24 02:45 AM
8

This is genuine hate speech and a call for genocide.
/r/MensRights14/09/24 01:54 AM
84

Sometimes, individual experience does not align with empirical evidence. Additionally, women are treated less severely by society for misconduct, with men being given 63% longer jail sentences than women for the same crimes. It is likely that the sentencing disparity extends to how children are punished as well.
/r/MensRights12/09/24 10:32 PM
1

I hate to be rude, but did you read the wikipedia article? Marxist feminism is all about value extraction (domestic labor performed by women, etc), not appearance or culture. Where are you making the connection between Marxism/Marxist feminism and women complaining about men's appearances? To my knowledge, those are liberal feminists, not Marxist feminists.
/r/MensRights21/05/24 10:45 PM
6

Quick question: what makes the feminists "Marxist?" I'm a staunch anti-marxist, but I see people on the left and the right calling everything Marxist but not knowing anything about what Marxism is, and never reading any Marx. In order to criticize an idea, you first have to understand that idea for what it is, not just what it feels like or appears to be. Given that Marx was an economist who wrote about surplus labor value extraction and a dialectical method of inquiry, and that Marx basically d…
/r/MensRights21/05/24 07:22 PM
17

As usual, women are concerned with feels, men are concerned with function. Cleaning to a woman isn't about hitting a functional state of "this state of organization makes sense and is conducive to the tasks I need to perform," but rather "this state of organization makes me feel icky or judged by other people, real or imaginary, and I have to do whatever it takes to stop making me feel icky/judged." It's not about function, its about feels. As always.
/r/MensRights12/05/24 09:00 PM
29

I got kicked from some of my favorite anarchist subreddits for posting on men's rights subreddits about how I got hatespeeched for being a man on a date. Not only do they invalidate male victims' experiences, they'll boot you from their community if you even talk about it. This has been a large part of why I've distanced myself from socialist/anarchist spaces too.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/03/24 08:57 PM
6

A "pick me" is a strikebreaker. Women as a class withhold attention and affection from men in order to extract resources from them: it's a strike. A "pick me" is a woman who crosses the picket line and gives attention and affection to a man for less resources, or for free. That's why women hate pick-mes, they undermine their collective bargaining power.
/r/MensRights01/03/24 10:45 AM
1

Where can I learn more about this theory/framework? It's very interesting! Any book recommendations?
/r/MensRights19/02/24 06:04 AM
9

Morality is aesthetics. We will never have the moral high ground due to morality being aesthetics, and women having an innate in-group bias.
/r/MensRights10/02/24 03:22 AM
7

"Always accuse your enemies of your own sins." - Joseph Goebbels
/r/MensRights09/02/24 10:12 PM
10

Men communicate through syntax and context, women communicate through tone and emotion. To men, words are symbols used to express information. To women, words are symbols used to express emotion. It's biological. Men evolved to be the fighting gender, and thus they evolved to not shy away from conflict, and they approach problems directly and procedurally. Women evolved to be the non-fighting gender, due to their smaller stature and the constant presence of small vulnerable children around them,…
/r/MensRights21/01/24 02:31 AM
1

I agree with a few things you said here, but I disagree with most. See my new comment under your last comment for a more detailed response. In it I raise the question: why should I want to be a provider? Why should I be a good man? It's what society pressures me to do, and what I've been conditioned to do for a lifetime, but what's in it for me?
/r/RedPillWomen31/12/23 03:11 AM
2

Nope, you keep her. That's the entire point of marriage, it locks both sides in. At least, it used to. I'm not advocating for this, but here's the historical context of marriage. Marrying for love is very new, that practice has only been widespread for 150 years. Traditionally, marriages were arranged by parents for their children. The point of marriage was a trade: a man enjoys a woman's beauty while it lasts, and has the woman raise his children. In exchange, the woman and her children are pro…
/r/RedPillWomen31/12/23 03:07 AM
2

I agree with you that most men are unable to become full providers, but this is due to economic circumstances outside of their control. You can't hard-work-and-leadership your way to a better salary in a broken economy. However, that doesn't stop men from wanting to be providers. This means that there's a small pool of men who can be providers but a lot of women who want to be provided for, so well-to-do men get to be very choosy about what women they provide for. I'm just here telling you what …
/r/RedPillWomen31/12/23 01:04 AM
1

Hey I'm not the one complaining about men not providing lmao. I'm not assuming anything, your post is literally complaining that men won't provide for you. I and other men will tell you plain and simple: if you want to be provided for, be worth providing for. The men you're dating aren't broken or afraid of providing for you, they see you as not worth providing for. Why would a man provide for a woman who spends all her time on her career, making money that she'll never give to him or spend on h…
/r/RedPillWomen30/12/23 11:52 PM
1

Copying my comment from a similar post: As a man, I think that the key to understanding this dynamic is gratitude. I am a man, and I love to provide. So do all of my male friends. It's really what men evolved to do: provide for and protect women and children. But we hate, hate, hate providing for and protecting women who take us for granted. Women who expect us to provide but give nothing, or just the bare minimum, back. Women who are entitled and unappreciative. Women who are ungrateful. I've h…
/r/RedPillWomen29/12/23 11:07 PM
1

As a man, I think that the key to understanding this dynamic is gratitude. I am a man, and I love to provide. So do all of my male friends. It's really what men evolved to do: provide for and protect women and children. But we hate, hate, hate providing for and protecting women who take us for granted. Women who expect us to provide but give nothing, or just the bare minimum, back. Women who are entitled and unappreciative. Women who are ungrateful. I see this attitude in your post. Men don't ha…
/r/RedPillWomen29/12/23 03:53 PM
1

Go on. Why does the deep state want to reduce the population? Simple malthusianism?
/r/MensRights29/12/23 03:30 PM
1

I'll bite. How come the deep state doesn't want women being married and having children?
/r/MensRights29/12/23 02:29 AM
6

I did want to chime in to say that money is not the only component in status. I work a white collar job, and I get a lot more attention that my buddies working as plumbers or electricians that are scraping 6 figures only a few years into their career. Skilled tradesmen make great money, but because working with your hands gives off poor vibes, women don't value it.
/r/MensRights25/12/23 08:51 PM
14

Excellent comment. Thank you.
/r/MensRights26/11/23 10:11 PM
7

I am an Anarchist, you nut. Look at the other subreddits I post in. You can do that by clicking on my username and looking at the posts on my profile. You'll see a stock subreddit, this one, a few meme pages, and a slew of Anarchist subreddits. I've been posting in anarchist subreddits for years, and I've even founded a subreddit for discussing anarchist economics, r/anarchomechanism. I'm not sure how a man like me who believes in no government wants to usher in a dictatorship, but hey, believe …
/r/MensRights26/11/23 09:01 PM
8

1: Inflation-Adjusted aka Real GDP Graph.. Same result, Biden wins. You're wrong. 2: I addressed cost of living and inflation, it's the banks. Again, it's not the government buying up the housing stock, it's banks. 3: When banks buy up the housing stock, that means people can't afford houses and they become homeless. And when people become homeless they turn to drugs and alcohol to cope. 4: You see more homeless people in blue states than red states because blue states are more urbanized than re…
/r/MensRights26/11/23 07:25 PM
8

There it is! That telltale sign of economic illiteracy rears its ugly head again, "taxation is theft!" I won't get into an ideological fight with you because I doubt that I'll be able to convince you. I doubly doubt it because I can infer from your sentence structure, run-ons, and lack of punctuation that you're a very young person (13-17) and your education and powers of reasoning aren't fully developed yet. But I will argue with you on facts and hard evidence. Everything that you just said abo…
/r/MensRights26/11/23 06:37 PM
6

I'd sympathize with your position if it were based in reality. The information that you are basing your political views on is not accurate, it is completely false corporate propaganda. There are two government social programs that cost A LOT: Medicaid/care, and social security. Both of these programs generally pay for themselves, more or less. Social security is just a transfer payment from a worker to themselves from when they're young to when they're old. The government taxes you the social se…
/r/MensRights26/11/23 05:38 PM
7

I am a professional economist. I largely only care about the economy. I vote far, far left because the left wing gets economic policy right and social issues wrong. Right wingers love to act like they know what's best for the economy, but in reality they're just posturing. Their policy positions are bought and paid for by monopolies. There's really not much difference between the two parties outside of social issues, as they're both corrupt and bought-out, but the blue corporate shills are gener…
/r/MensRights26/11/23 05:00 PM
15

Preach. Unfortunately, conservatives use the term "leftists" to refer to liberals, when people who are actually to the left of liberals (communists, anarchists, libertarian socialists, etc.) generally care far more about economic issues than social issues. Actual leftists care about seizing the means of production, not drag queen story time or whatever. Liberals are basically the mirror image of christian conservatives: make every issue about their own moral beliefs, and shame and berate anyone …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/08/23 01:42 AM
1

If you have a ceremony, regardless of whether or not you sign a contract, the state is going to view that as a common law marriage. Do not have a ceremony.
/r/MensRights25/08/23 01:10 AM
7

I'm sorry that's been your experience. You sound like a very capable and caring partner. However, my personal experience has been much closer to the above comment instead of yours. All of the women in my life, from my mother to girlfriends to friends' girlfriends to family members, do an unnecessary amount of planning and controlling that everyone around them wishes they wouldn't do. They make elaborate plans for things that don't need to happen, and then go to great efforts (and put their partn…
/r/MensRights15/08/23 05:38 PM
6

It's what we do when women say stuff like 'I hate men," "men are pigs," and "kill all men" online and to our faces, but we have to pretend like it's fine and not hate speech because we'll be persecuted if we speak up.
/r/MensRights15/08/23 05:24 PM
44

I made a post about this on a different subreddit. Essentially all the men in the comments thoroughly agreed that most women are bad at sex, and all of the women in the comments were DESPERATELY grasping for any excuse for how that's actually my or men's fault, twisting and intentionally misconstruing my very clear words in order to avoid accountability in any way, shape, or form. Make of that what you will.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/08/23 01:53 PM
6

Alaska is already close to 60% men. The problem is, it's Alaska. Also, the Free State Project has largely been a failure. This is largely because libertarians are typically physical property and business owners, and property and business owners tend to stay with their property and businesses. Dual power models are very useful, but we should not look to emulate the Free State Project, because it's been going since the 80s and it's basically failed.
/r/MensRights05/08/23 04:16 PM
12

Joker (2019)
/r/MensRights05/08/23 05:10 AM
4

Nope. The "women are wonderful" and "men are terrible" biases are evolutionarily ingrained into humans. We're biologically fucked from the start.
/r/MensRights03/08/23 12:36 AM
6

Nope. The "women are wonderful" and "men are terrible" biases are evolutionarily ingrained into humans. We're biologically fucked from the start.
/r/MensRights03/08/23 12:36 AM
7

I very much agree with this, but I would add that society having all-male leaders is almost ubiquitously conflated with all men being leaders. When most people in my (progressive) social circles talk about patriarchy, they do mean a state of affairs in which men as a class had large concrete authority over women as a class, not your definition of simply most people at the top being men. I think that this common understanding of patriarchy is inaccurate, as the primary mode of oppression in our s…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/07/23 10:08 PM
711

Getting away with being weird, awkward, or too forward. Both men and women give people they're attracted to more "chances" and leeway.
/r/seduction23/05/23 12:11 AM
4

Preach
/r/MensRights10/04/23 12:05 AM
4

It's worse: I was autobanned, and then I reached out to a mod to overturn the ban, and then they pointed to my post on this subreddit as a banable offense and muted me. In that post, I even directly endorsed a prominent figure in the community I was banned from. It's beyond parody. I'm still mad about it.
/r/MensRights17/03/23 09:43 PM
5

I got autobanned from one of my favorite subs for posting about being hatespeeched irl on this subreddit. Makes me sad that a community that means so much to me irl is so discriminatory against victimized men.
/r/MensRights17/03/23 09:36 PM
10

Society poses women as sex objects and men as success objects. For many reasons, both socially constructed and biologically determined, men and women are not held to the same standards and expectations. Because a man is a success object, the worst thing he could be is a manchild, a bum, a loser, a deadbeat, or some variation of "person not capable of providing resources". Because women are sex objects, the worst thing she could be is a slut, whore, fatty, hag, or some variation of "person not wo…
/r/MensRights09/02/23 01:26 PM
4

That is definitely not the vibe. We're here to oppose oppressive gender norms and institutions, not to literally oppose women.
/r/MensRights09/09/22 04:57 PM
-5

Jordan Peterson is pretty terrible in everything he does external to self-help. Check out his debate with Slavoj Zizek to watch him get his ass handed to him on politics.
/r/MensRights03/09/22 09:29 PM
1

Economics
/r/MensRights16/11/21 06:18 PM
-5

I completely agree, rip ur upvote count from all the Jordan Peterson shills.
/r/MensRights16/11/21 05:16 PM
7

I personally would advocate against homeschooling. I was secularly homeschooled by two parents with the best intentions and it fucked me up beyond comprehension. Kids need to be surrounded by their peers constantly when growing up (6+ hours a day) in order to be properly socialized and adapted to the society that they are going to enter. Homeschooling doesn't give them nearly enough exposure to other kids on a regular basis, no matter how hard you try. Homeschooling isolates kids from steady gro…
/r/MensRights16/11/21 05:14 PM
1

Jordan Peterson got absolutely destroyed in his debate with Slavoj Zizek. He's an absolute clown who peddles self-help tips while posing as an intellectual. As a graduate student who's actually trying to put in work in academia, I have no respect for fake intellectual posers like him.
/r/MensRights13/11/21 06:31 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter