TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

DontTrustRedditors Archive

View 0 posts and 144 comments by DontTrustRedditors on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

Just a liar with a lot of brigading friends.
/r/MensRights26/12/17 02:37 PM
2

Guns can't shoot imaginary people, though, and it's obvious from her story that she has made it up in order to have a perfect 'comeback' to logic. She states several things that simply aren't true, and the police in her story violate all of their training AND the laws of most states by not handling an accusation of domestic violence properly. Even if she wasn't in one of those states, they would still have been trained to take her statement, and would have followed it up by questioning her husba…
/r/MensRights26/12/17 02:36 PM
3

You stated two things that are flat-out lies: that you can't get a restraining order during a custody hearing, and that you got a public defender in a civil case. I don't see any reason to assume anything you and your feminist brigader friends is true at this point.
/r/MensRights26/12/17 02:33 PM
3

The feminists will downvote, because they don't care if someone is lying so long as they 'started a conversation', but literally nothing about her story makes sense.
/r/MensRights26/12/17 02:32 PM
1

This is all lies. You can get a restraining order during custody hearings. Saying this alone marks you as an obvious liar. Public Defenders only exist in criminal trials, not family court. There is a child advocate, but that's not the same thing and they wouldn't be on her side at all. This is a lie. This is something you saw on TV. They would question the man if these accusations were made against him. If he was accused of domestic violence they would immediately offer to have him removed from …
/r/MensRights26/12/17 02:32 PM
3

I kind of sounds like a made-up situation to me. Cops don't ignore domestic violence complaints. If this happened, it didn't happen in the last twenty years. And it probably never happened at all. This is the internet. People lie a lot on the internet.
/r/MensRights26/12/17 02:28 PM
4

This person is literally just lying, using made-up feminist shibboleths like 'The cops will just ignore me!' to make her point. I doubt this person even has a sister.
/r/MensRights26/12/17 02:26 PM
3

Okay, make the accusation to the press, then get sued when you can't back up your statement and you cause monetary impact to the person you accused. The only thing we really need to make false accusations made to the press go away is, tougher rules against defamation.
/r/MensRights26/12/17 02:24 PM
2

No you don't. You enjoy making up bullshit stories to 'support' your side of a political argument. I flat out don't believe that your sister went to the cops, told them that she was raped and that her husband is threatening to murder her and their family, and that the cops then went 'Oh well, what are you gonna do?' and sent her home without taking a statement of questioning the brother. That is what you're asserting happened. That would violate the department procedures of every PD in the count…
/r/MensRights26/12/17 02:23 PM
1

No they didn't. I'm not even kind of going to believe what you're saying here. This is literally the exact opposite of how police are trained. There is no way the cops didn't at least question the man, assuming he ever actually existed in the first place.
/r/MensRights26/12/17 02:21 PM
1

Feminists hate men, keep spouting this 'the future is female!' bullshit to make it clear to all men how much they hate us.
/r/MensRights30/11/17 01:20 PM
12

I guarantee that the mods of /r/science would have removed any study, no matter how valid, that finds anything negative about women. Because they have repeatedly done just that. But an online survey being picked apart in the comments is allowed to stand because the mods there are radfems who hate men.
/r/MensRights30/11/17 01:18 PM
2

No they don't. Men can't even be charged with this there. You're flat-out lying. This charge was invented entirely to let women off easy if they kill their babies. Only women can be charged with it. You're a fucking liar. A dirty, bald-faced fucking liar.
/r/MensRights30/11/17 01:07 PM
3

The sentence is justifying murder. Not even 5 years for murdering a baby. Seriously, /u/butterpirate, what the fuck is wrong with someone who thinks stealing and baby killing are morally equivalent crimes?
/r/MensRights30/11/17 01:05 PM
0

It's definitely not the case here, as 15 months is far too long for that. This woman just murdered her baby, and feminists like you make excuses for her, because how dare a woman ever be held responsible for her actions.
/r/MensRights30/11/17 01:04 PM
2

Locking her in a cage where she can't get pregnant and murder another child. Or sterilize her. That's an actual practical answer. Your answer is not practical. Your answer is emotional, and designed to exempt murderers from guilt simply because they claim to feel bad about it later.
/r/MensRights30/11/17 01:03 PM
2

'Treated with compassion' means 'let them go free and clear with no significant penalties'. Tell me, would you find it acceptable to sterilize this woman, or at least to put her under parole with the condition that she never have another child?
/r/MensRights30/11/17 01:02 PM
5

So? If she killed someone, she belongs in prison or a mental ward for a very long time. I don't give a shit what her excuse is. She's dangerous. We can't let someone out there who thinks murdering people is an acceptable way to solve their problems. Full Stop.
/r/MensRights30/11/17 01:01 PM
3

Kind of, but some of these women are being let off for post-partum depression long after their hormones should have normalized. Many of these women simply can't hack parenthood, and kill their kids as an escape, not due to post-partum depression, which shouldn't still be hitting them years later.
/r/MensRights30/11/17 12:59 PM
2

I don't think a separate 'infanticide' charge is defensible in any way. When someone is found not guilty due to mental defect in the US, they are held indefinitely, not for a some less-bound period. This woman would probably never see daylight again here.
/r/MensRights30/11/17 12:58 PM
3

Liberals decided a long time ago that it was okay for women to murder babies, as babies basically constitute a woman's personal property in the eyes of the left. So they're allowed to kill them (and then blame the father) or even just drop them off like like unwanted clothes at a salvation army drop box. Women are just 'special' in the eyes of the left, and shouldn't have to obey the same rules as everyone else. And Australia is a far-leftist feminist state.
/r/MensRights30/11/17 12:53 PM
5

Let me guess: feminist teachers taught you this? They love to tell half a story. They ramble on and on about women's oppression--some of which was genuine, and some of which they just made up, like 'rule of thumb' and other such nonsense. But they never mention all of the 12 year old boys sent to die down in the mines or in factories or out on the hunt.
/r/MensRights20/11/17 01:30 PM
2

Maybe in theory, but practice is a whole other story.
/r/MensRights20/11/17 01:26 PM
3

White men are technically underrepresented among mass-shooters.
/r/MensRights07/11/17 01:51 PM
-15

It was a stupid question. Why on god's green earth did you think it was normal for three uniformed cops to stand around, let alone grab, one of the people in a line-up? It was obvious who the guy was.
/r/MensRights07/11/17 01:46 PM
7

No, but at this point his lawyers can probably get an injunction against any further lawsuits from this group and/or from these lawyers (or they'll pretend to form a new group to get around the injunction).
/r/MensRights07/11/17 01:44 PM
9

Again, that's not the same thing at all. The CDC has a mandate to study and contain outbreaks of disease in this country. Gun violence is not a disease. There is no valid reason why the CDC would want to study gun violence. The only possible reasons are political ones--they wanted to propagandize for gun control, even though that's nowhere in their purview.
/r/MensRights06/11/17 02:26 PM
22

What business does Center for Disease Control have to study firearms or gun violence? They aren't the Center for Gun Control. They aren't The Center for Keeping Statistics on Everything. They're meant to study and contain disease outbreaks, and only that. It's fucked that congress even needed to tell them 'no' on this. They never should have been trying to do it at all.
/r/MensRights06/11/17 02:21 PM
1

https://www.reddit.com/r/GenderCritical/ I could have sworn you said 'less retarded', but then you linked to Gender Critical...
/r/MensRights30/10/17 11:07 AM
1

Sigh That's not an argument. You're just a troll.
/r/MensRights30/10/17 11:06 AM
1

So, no actual media pieces, just a bunch of bloggers... Why does the mainstream media feel the need to do this, then? It comes across as extreme agenda-pushing. It's not like they're letting Return of the Kings people public op-eds there.
/r/MensRights30/10/17 11:05 AM
2

I'm not going to trust anything with a goal of 'social justice', which pretty much just means revenge against men and white people when put into practice. Sorry. A bunch of rich kids jerking themselves off while ignoring the economic catastrophe of the last decade.
/r/MensRights30/10/17 11:02 AM
0

/r/science, /r/askhistorians, /r/psychology, /r/legaladvice; most of the so-called professional subs are viper-pits of feminist bullshit.
/r/MensRights29/10/17 02:54 PM
1

Of course, the post about this on /r/psychology is just an anti-male wankfest. That 'field' of study has no validity in my eyes, if that's what it consists of.
/r/MensRights29/10/17 02:46 PM
2

Tell, how exactly is violating the right to free association and expression 'protecting the constitution'. You people are the nazis you're so terrified of.
/r/MensRights27/10/17 10:56 PM
5

We actually do have bread knives here, though. And knives are usually bought as a set. The 'bread knife' is the long, thin, serrated blade.
/r/MensRights23/10/17 10:37 PM
3

Dude literally named himself after the concept of the White Knight. I'd wager he's a troll.
/r/MensRights20/10/17 02:38 PM
2

Still makes you a cunt for thinking that excuses false rape accusations. Lots of people have shit situations. They're expected to be human beings anyway. Shit, Tom was a black dude growing up in the Old South. If he had raped her, would that be an excuse?
/r/MensRights20/10/17 02:37 PM
1

Women are far more prone to censorship than men are, and have a much stronger intra-group bias than men do. Arguing against this, is like arguing against the notion that men are more likely to commit crime.
/r/MensRights20/10/17 02:28 PM
8

Listen and Believe is not a guideline anymore, it's a mantra for the feminists that want anything they can get that they can use to hurt men. Given the kind of woman drawn to modern feminism, it never could have ended any other way.
/r/MensRights20/10/17 09:06 AM
15

None of them got 10k upvotes...in a thread that only got 1k upvotes. Brigades are okay when feminists do them.
/r/MensRights19/10/17 11:54 AM
19

5 years ago, posts from /r/askmen regularly made the front page. But since the feminazis took control of it, it's basically dead.
/r/MensRights19/10/17 11:53 AM
4

We know the women are lying because most of them have already had sex with robotic penises.
/r/MensRights18/10/17 01:43 PM
1

Male privilege is getting to have your gender 'norms' defined by the other gender. To some extent, this is just a part of the human condition. We decide what's attractive in women, women decide what's attractive in men. That's just nature doing it's thing.
/r/MensRights16/10/17 12:52 PM
2

Gotta disagree. I'm 35. And while 'fag' mostly disappears, 'Douche' will always be with you.
/r/MensRights16/10/17 12:52 PM
1

It's an American thing. Being 'well dressed' was seen as foppish, dressing like the aristocracies of the old country, who were seen as deviant and often dabbled in homosexuality. Americans, particularly in the old days, hated anything associated with the noble classes of the old countries. Grand theater, overly stylish clothing, and homosexuality were all seen as being of a piece.
/r/MensRights16/10/17 12:50 PM
1

I gotta ask, do you people not wear underclothes? A white shirt and boxers will protect dress shirts from most body soil, and prevent any significant odor from cropping up. Also, powder your balls. It has little to do with anything, but you'd be shocked at how much cleaner you feel when the boys aren't clinging to everything.
/r/MensRights16/10/17 12:42 PM
0

Are they wrong? If so, show how. If not, shut the fuck up.
/r/MensRights14/10/17 12:49 PM
3

So why should we support anyone else's rights, if we're just going to end up living miserable, lonely lives? Honestly, why should I give a shit about making someone else's life better if mine is shit, and there's no feasible way for it to stop being shit. Most men will never be able to earn 40k a year in the modern economy. All the good jobs are being shipped over seas, and women are demand equal access to the remaining jobs--without ever once lowering their own expectations for males, which the…
/r/MensRights14/10/17 12:48 PM
8

Keep in mind: the most common wage in this country is 25k. Women are literally demanding nearly twice the most common wage before they will even think about marrying a man.
/r/MensRights14/10/17 12:45 PM
1

It's not hard: You simple require that all witness testimony be backed by evidence, and what cannot be backed by evidence, isn't admissible in courts. It hardly takes a genius. We aren't living in 1500 anymore.
/r/MensRights10/10/17 11:14 AM
4

So, you think it makes sense to punish men by clogging up the men's bathroom, too? How the fuck does that make sense? Nature isn't fair. You don't see the government hiring hookers to make up for the fact that men have a harder time finding casual sex, do you? Then why the fuck should we have to hold it, just because we can piss quicker than they can?
/r/MensRights07/10/17 11:41 AM
5

I'm not going to listen to their excuses. Fuck them for caring more about women, than men. Fuck Jack-n-the-Box. Whattaburger is ten times the place they are, and they don't pull this shit, because they're based in Texas, not whatever froopy bullshit place Jack-n-the-Box is based in.
/r/MensRights07/10/17 11:39 AM
2

Lmao, that's a massive conspiracy theory to assume, just to white knight and give feminists a pass.
/r/MensRights07/10/17 11:36 AM
1

And why do you think they run these clickbait campaigns? It's not like this makes them look good to men.
/r/MensRights07/10/17 11:36 AM
3

There is no such thing as a feminist who is positive about male sexuality.
/r/MensRights07/10/17 11:35 AM
1

Well, stop being a feminazi's paradise, and stop arresting people for being critical of immigration, and people will stop pissing all over your shitty little island.
/r/MensRights06/10/17 03:44 PM
1

That's how you know that /u/Iain_1986 is a feminazi. He doesn't just defend the court...he calls the man stupid for not knowing how biased the court system was against men. Fuck him.
/r/MensRights06/10/17 03:44 PM
0

Look, it's a shill from /r/all telling us not to be upset about a horribly biased court system again! Go fuck yourself, calling this poor man an idiot. Show some fucking sympathy for the victim, you piece of shit lawyer.
/r/MensRights06/10/17 03:42 PM
0

Because we're sick of cunts like you coming in from /r/all and making excuses, almost all of which turn out to be lies?
/r/MensRights06/10/17 03:40 PM
1

Feminists are bigotted fuckheads. Never let the trolls from /r/all convince you of anything different.
/r/MensRights06/10/17 09:28 AM
34

Honestly, it's not just Disney, it's EVERYTHING. The media made no attempt whatsoever to accurately portray the loss in life status that most Americans have suffered since 2007. They portray everyone as capable of the same level of success (which was already inflated vs. reality in 2007). They act like women can regularly expect gifts worth several hundreds of dollars, when income fell off a cliff ten years ago and never came close to recovering. Honestly, most women expect men to be capable of …
/r/MensRights05/10/17 08:10 PM
1

Michael Moore is just another liberals who hates men.
/r/MensRights05/10/17 01:20 PM
48

Feminists care more about fake women, than real men. What a surprise!
/r/MensRights05/10/17 01:17 PM
24

Explains why white male life expectancy went down under her husband--the only demographic to do so. Between their racial issues and his daddy issues, and who they nominated last time, it's no wonder that 2/3rds of men voted Republican last year.
/r/MensRights05/10/17 01:15 PM
2

Us the Video Blocker Extension to block the channel, and never have to see this man-hating shithole on youtube again.
/r/MensRights04/10/17 07:16 PM
16

Eat my dick, you filthy cunt -- that's how civil you're being in this statement.
/r/MensRights03/10/17 02:50 PM
6

In theory, sure, But if you get into bed with a guy, and then accuse him of 'attempted rape' even though he stopped when you actually said no, then I'm not going to believe that you're anything but a tease who looks to get men riled up, and then loves to scare them with obviously ridiculous accusations. If this was 20 years ago, I might go along with what you're saying. But feminists have used your kind of logic to take things WAY too far in removing due process. So I don't have any kind of pati…
/r/MensRights03/10/17 02:50 PM
4

That's kind of an admission on their part that they aren't a reliable source of information, either.
/r/MensRights03/10/17 02:18 PM
5

If they're pushing this line, you can guarantee you he was a left-winger. Otherwise, they'd be talking about how he must be a nazi.
/r/MensRights03/10/17 02:15 PM
1

Dumb people do shit like this all of the time. Do you have any idea how many people have been arrested after filming their crimes and posting them to YouTube?
/r/MensRights03/10/17 02:14 PM
1

'let's admit to my cunning plan on the internet. Because nobody else is on the internet, and it's not like you can look this shit up later...' Personally, I'd just kill a bitch who falsely accused me of rape, but this woman's just straight-up retarded.
/r/MensRights03/10/17 02:13 PM
2

ITT: feminists and other redditors making excuses they would never accept themselves.
/r/MensRights01/10/17 03:01 PM
2

The 'first wave' wasn't even real. It's a lie latter feminists made up. NONE of those people would have called themselves feminists. They didn't adhere to any common feminist beliefs. They were almost universally church groups and conservative women's societies, not 'feminists'. They were simply 'adopted' by feminists later, without any actual say for themselves. If you don't even know that, then why should I listen to your supposed beliefs about second wave feminists?
/r/MensRights01/10/17 03:00 PM
3

This woman confessed to making a false accusation. That's all you need for a conviction. If she isn't arrested, it isn't for lack of evidence. And if she's not a victim, he name shouldn't be withheld. And yes, we all know that the UK as shithole of a country, with feminazi policies and such, but there's no way to justify plastering his name everywhere. NONE.
/r/MensRights29/09/17 01:59 PM
4

How is it 'due process' to keep a lying cunt's name out of the paper? You just hate men. YOU are the reason men despise feminazis. You're the reason the word Feminazi exists.
/r/MensRights29/09/17 01:57 PM
2

She confessed. You don't have to be found guilty of crimes you've confessed to.
/r/MensRights29/09/17 01:56 PM
-15

This is an indefensible statement. It is a proven fact that women face stiffer sentences than a man. Why the fuck is feminist garbage like this upvoted here?
/r/MensRights26/09/17 03:47 PM
-6

You're a libertarian. The only reason you people pretend to care about the men's rights movement, is to hold it back and prevent anyone from doing anything that might be effective. the movement would literally be better off without you people. You don't believe that the government should do anything at all, so what the fuck business do you have in political advocacy, other than to tell people not to engage in political advocacy?
/r/MensRights26/09/17 01:45 AM
4

But they're literally using gender to determine that all else is not equal. There is no difference between this, and what is already ruled illegal in health insurance. you're just another lying feminist apologist.
/r/MensRights26/09/17 01:43 AM
3

There is literally no difference between doing that, and charging women more for health insurance because women 1) are more likely to use health insurance and 2) typically undergo more costly procedures during their lifetime. What, do you libertarians have some kind of psychotic obsession with this sub? Because none of you ever go into feminist conversations and pull this shit.
/r/MensRights26/09/17 01:43 AM
6

Yes, they are. There is no difference between the factors you point out, and the factors that are specifically made illegal to when it comes to charging women more for health insurance.
/r/MensRights26/09/17 01:41 AM
-4

And this is why this sub is useless. It's full of idiot libertarians pretending to be MRAs, who are here for no other reason than to derail the movement.
/r/MensRights26/09/17 01:41 AM
11

So you're a liar, then? You can't back up what you've said. You just relied on other feminists upvoting your lies, and the 'even handedness' of MRAs to get away with being a lying asshole. What a shock! A feminist lies, and other feminists decide to just go along with it!
/r/MensRights25/09/17 12:16 PM
3

The person you're responding to is apparently lying. Not that any of you care, you're just upvoting a lying feminist's excuses because they're a feminist.
/r/MensRights25/09/17 12:15 PM
12

Oh, you mean /u/whoop_there_she_is is a fucking liar? there's a shock, a lying feminist upvoted by the trolls and brigaders...that never happens.
/r/MensRights25/09/17 12:14 PM
5

I don't believe you.
/r/MensRights25/09/17 12:13 PM
8

Only after the post got linked to other subs.
/r/MensRights24/09/17 11:34 AM
19

/r/againsthatesubreddits is about hate, hate, and more hate, with absolutely nothing else. It's literally a hate group that thinks it's found acceptable targets.
/r/MensRights24/09/17 11:33 AM
5

I guarantee you that they would see reading a feminist site as good reason to get fired. Edit: actually meant 'wouldn't'. But it's good to see a discussion.
/r/MensRights24/09/17 11:32 AM
5

That sub's filled with the literal definition of feminazis.
/r/MensRights24/09/17 11:32 AM
3

Feminists can't say we've done nothing in the real world now, can they?
/r/MensRights23/09/17 11:52 AM
2

I'll believe it when I see it. I don't believe I'll ever see it.
/r/MensRights23/09/17 11:51 AM
1

The UK doesn't give a shit about protecting its citizens. Don't trot out this transparent bullshit to me. Hiding the accusers name, while allowing the name of the accused IS concealing the truth you fucking retard.
/r/MensRights23/09/17 11:50 AM
38

Again, why the fuck do feminists get to talk about domestic violence and rape CONSTANTLY without these same identical accusations?
/r/MensRights21/09/17 04:38 PM
403

Funny how you people never once complain when feminists try to raise awareness about domestic violence or rape. But when men try to raise awareness that women are the most likely people to abuse their children, and that this has to be stopped, you all shout abuse at as. WTF, /u/tchoob, get your ass in here and try to invent a difference between the two, or prove that you also go into feminist boards and harass them.
/r/MensRights21/09/17 04:37 PM
0

These are feminists, not female MRAs. They cannot ever be trusted. I will not trust anyone naive enough to work with them
/r/MensRights20/09/17 01:14 PM
0

I'm not working with feminists. And if you work with feminists, I will work against you, because whatever you SAY you're going to do, I'm not going to believe you. Because if you cared about men's issues, you wouldn't be working with feminists.
/r/MensRights20/09/17 01:13 PM
1

Alright, no point in investing in a movement of people who don't actually want to win, and just want to stroke their own poles over the idea of their own nobility. The kind of men you need to get things done, won't go along with that approach.
/r/MensRights20/09/17 01:12 PM
0

Then you're a fool, and you'll implode your own movement. Because too many people disagree with you, and they will just walk out of the movement entirely out of fear of a hidden feminist in their midst.
/r/MensRights20/09/17 01:10 PM
1

I'm sorry that you're autistic and unable to understand common terms in the English language. Edit: I actually mean that. Either you're being a pedantic asshole, or you're autistic. Because people use both terms non-literally all the time, and only an autistic person would assume that they had to be literal. Or someone pretending to be obtuse.
/r/MensRights20/09/17 01:05 PM
5

Name a feminist woman who was successfully elected--directly--to office. They'll elect men, because they assume it's just pandering to female voters with them. But electorates will not elect feminist women to office.
/r/MensRights20/09/17 01:05 PM
12

The feminists downvoting this don't want to hear it, but it's true. Women have been elected to the top position, directly, in many countries. But feminist women don't get elected unless it's through a parliamentary system--and even then, rarely serve out their terms without being driven out of office.
/r/MensRights20/09/17 01:04 PM
5

Also, she had had other jobs after college: Proof is in the pudding, bub. She's responsible for the biggest fuck-up the field has ever experienced. That means she sucks at her job. I don't get idiots like you trying to convince us that someone who is manifestly bad at their job--because they failed miserable at it--is actually super qualified. Before this happened, yours would be the 'simple' answer. Now, that she's a shit diversity hire is the 'simple' answer. Because she fucked it all up.
/r/MensRights18/09/17 12:13 PM
0

LMAO. You people are so intentionally ignorant that it's hilarious. I don't believe that you believe what you're saying, and I think you're a wretched cunt for trying to get me to believe it.
/r/MensRights18/09/17 12:11 PM
2

Are you autistic? I'm honestly asking, because there are lot of connections and implications that you seem not to make or get, and that when it comes to social info like that, it's most often an indication of autism. Like, you really think that this is just reporting a statistic, instead of 'reporting to raise awareness', which is very obviously is.
/r/MensRights18/09/17 12:10 PM
1

Well, you're not wrong.
/r/MensRights18/09/17 12:07 PM
3

I tell myself this every time I start to come down from shrooms. But then I cry anyway, because I'm on a shit-ton of psychedelics, and that shit will make you cry for no reason.
/r/MensRights18/09/17 12:07 PM
4

SJWs hate men. They love it when men are discriminated against.
/r/MensRights17/09/17 06:26 PM
1

What the fuck is the point of guessing? And why isn't 'X group is responsible for the majority of crime!' allowed for any other demographic group?
/r/MensRights17/09/17 06:26 PM
66

These guys are almost always wealthy, have incredibly good jobs, but women think that this is 'average' because television tells them that they can expect better. the media's complete unwillingness to come to terms with the effects of the Great Recession and portray American life more accurate (instead of portraying people who should be paupers as living in grand apartments and three-story houses, with lifestyles to match) has given women an immensely inaccurate metric by which to judge real-lif…
/r/MensRights17/09/17 01:21 PM
23

They actually mean 'influence' when they mean 'coercion'. In their minds, a man trying to change their minds in any way--even using logic, reason or other standard, polite argumentation methods--is 'coercing' them. They think women are too weak to stand on their own. And sometimes, they're right. But I've seen men fold when they should have stood, and that's on them, not their gender, the same as with the women.
/r/MensRights17/09/17 12:31 AM
2

It isn't even pressure. MOST wives view their husbands as the leaders of their life, otherwise they wouldn't have chosen that man to be their husband. It takes zero pressure to convince someone to go along with their leader. That's what leadership is. If anything, women felt pressured by culture to defy their own wisdom and vote for 'the woman' because other women told them to.
/r/MensRights17/09/17 12:30 AM
21

Because men never do ANYTHING because we feel pressured by women... I am sick of women playing victim. THIS is why we can't have a female President. We cannot have a President who is immune to criticism due to their identity. That's what made Obama such a shitty Prez.
/r/MensRights17/09/17 12:27 AM
13

The worst part of western culture, is the idea that if a group can convince the rest of us that they are 'victims', suddenly they become immune to any and all criticism. You're right. MGM's fault is placed on two groups, first the jews who thought it up, then the puritans who used it explicitly to control male sexuality.
/r/MensRights17/09/17 12:25 AM
0

You all keep saying this to dismiss the issue. You literally want to pretend that what's happening, isn't happening, because you all hate men that much.
/r/MensRights15/09/17 12:05 PM
-1

Prove it, or I see no reason to actually listen to you. Anyone can say anything.
/r/MensRights15/09/17 12:03 PM
1

The feminists on this sub will still claim to see an invisible sign by the women's door that claims they are both gender-neutral, the same way they always do when this gets brought up. The concern trolls around here make this sub useless.
/r/MensRights15/09/17 12:03 PM
5

Oh look, something that ACTUALLY has nothing to do with men's rights upvoted to the top of this shitty, feminist sub. Going on my blocklist.
/r/MensRights10/09/17 10:36 AM
1

Cunt empowers them and provides them "evidence" of their imaginary oppression. I don't care if they have 'evidence' of their own delusions. Until women abandon the word 'dick', I'm going to keep using the word cunt.
/r/MensRights09/09/17 10:39 AM
1

Fuck off, cunt.
/r/MensRights09/09/17 10:38 AM
1

No it didn't. This is what feminists say to try to defend the indefensible, but they have literally never used it this way. From the moment feminist blogs started trotting this out ten years ago, it has always been 'OMG, how dare this male say anything!'.
/r/MensRights09/09/17 10:37 AM
1

I don't believe that. I doubt that ever most feminists actually believe this. I know that they love to say it. But they love to say a lot of things.
/r/MensRights09/09/17 10:36 AM
1

That's what they say. But they've used it for like 10 years now, and never like that. Always like this. Feminists lie a lot. They say 'this means something other than what it obviously means'. They claim that toxic masculinity isn't a dig on men...and then use it exclusively as a dig on men. They claim that 'manspreading' isn't really gender-biased, and that it's supposed to describe condescension...then they use it against every man who speaks against them in public. I'd say that it's not delib…
/r/MensRights09/09/17 10:35 AM
1

This is retard, classist bullshit. They don't disagree with you because they're stupid. Almost nobody disagrees with anyone entirely because they are stupid. And calling them 'undereducated' is just saying, 'ha ha, I got to go to college, and you didn't'.
/r/MensRights09/09/17 10:31 AM
2

ITT: The libertarian shills who infest (and make worthless) this sub, declaring that it's perfectly okay to be a bigot if lets you make more money.
/r/MensRights09/09/17 10:26 AM
6

This is why most of the people on this sub hate feminism.
/r/MensRights08/09/17 11:55 AM
1

Then you and yours shouldn't have used your shield as a sword against people not like you. You want us to protect, what, 2% of the population, at the expense of 50% of it?
/r/MensRights07/09/17 11:30 AM
3

I see no evidence that this will make any difference. I don't see why the Democrats would care if Trump was reasonable about this or not because they themselves are not reasonable about this at all. It's become a partisan issue, so they won't ever be reasonable. Partisans are not responsible, reasonable or measured people. They are rabid dogs, and as such, what you fear will happen, will happen regardless. Yours is a pipe dream, one likely born of youth and inexperience with the system.
/r/MensRights07/09/17 11:29 AM
1

I doubt we'll see that. Obama was a strange case--particularly hostile to men, even compared to your typical Democrat, probably due to daddy issues. Never trust someone who grew up without a father. They will always have issues with men.
/r/MensRights07/09/17 11:27 AM
2

The election went a long way toward getting rid of all my crazy friends.
/r/MensRights07/09/17 11:24 AM
0

Oh, you're just one of those cunts then. You literally want a different set of rules for women and SJWs, than you do for everyone else.
/r/MensRights07/09/17 11:22 AM
1

As long as anti-feminists are getting fired, I want the feminists who post hateful shit to get fired. This isn't about some lofty set of ideals to me, bub. To me, people who think that way are fucking children, looking for some grand and comprehensive idea to govern every area of their life--and the real world doesn't work that way, the real world needs flexibility in ideas and tactics. Rigidity is a desire for simplicity, nothing grander or more admirable than that. I'm a tit-for-tat kind of gu…
/r/MensRights07/09/17 11:22 AM
2

You know, Slavery was the law, jack-ass.
/r/MensRights07/09/17 11:13 AM
14

It's just so creepy and wrong and this isn't a men's rights issue. Go fuck yourself. I don't believe you care even the slightest bit about men's issues. You folks who say this never seem to.
/r/MensRights07/09/17 11:12 AM
31

God damn, every blue state in the country seems to have a bloodlust for sending men to jail over...well, everything. This shouldn't be remotely illegal. Somehow, though, sleeping with your boss and cheating on your husband is perfectly okay (but only if you're a woman). Edit: It always comes down to some feminazi DA. ALWAYS. Never vote for a Democratic DA, because they are all feminazis.
/r/MensRights07/09/17 11:10 AM
1

ITT: A lot of the usual suspects, who constantly tell us that there are bigger fish to fry, but who never post any issues of their own, leading to the impression that they are just trolling feminists.
/r/MensRights05/09/17 12:19 PM
1

If others are already outraged about this, then it is indeed a good fight to pick in order to raise awareness of our issues over-all. Your argument fails by its own logic.
/r/MensRights05/09/17 12:18 PM
-1

Oh look, someone who only comes to this sub to bitch about us. Fuck off.
/r/MensRights05/09/17 12:17 PM
2

I don't care. They NEVER would have done this on Mother's day, and I do care about that. I'm sick to death of people like you excuse everything done against men. Why the hell are you even here?
/r/MensRights05/09/17 12:16 PM
2

Feminists really do love screaming about how much they hate men, don't they?
/r/MensRights05/09/17 12:14 PM
2

ITT: /r/Changemyview brigading this sub.
/r/MensRights03/09/17 08:16 PM
2

You literally followed him here from that sub, on an account made specifically to argue in that thread...
/r/MensRights03/09/17 08:15 PM
2

I don't believe you, tbh. It seems like if you had anything to point to, you'd do it. Instead you're just using a lot of weasely buzzwords to create the impression of wrongdoing without citing any specific examples.
/r/MensRights03/09/17 08:14 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter