TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • Other

      • /r/AllPillDebate
      • /r/AlreadyRed
      • /r/altTRP
      • /r/AntiFeminists
      • /r/askFDS
      • /r/askMRP
      • /r/askRPC
      • /r/becomeaman
      • /r/BlackPillScience
      • /r/Chadfish
      • /r/Divorce_Men
      • /r/EverydayMisandry
      • /r/ExRedPill
      • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
      • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
      • /r/GEOTRP
      • /r/MalePsychology
      • /r/Male_Studies
      • /r/MenSupportMen
      • /r/MGTOW2
      • /r/MuslimRedPill
      • /r/newTRP
      • /r/PussyPass
      • /r/PussyPassDenied
      • /r/RedPillBooks
      • /r/RedPillParenting
      • /r/RedPillWives
      • /r/RedPillWomen
      • /r/RedPillWorkplace
      • /r/RPChristians
      • /r/ThankTRP
      • /r/TheRedPillStories
      • /r/trpGAME
      • /r/TRPOffTopic
      • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
      • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • A Voice for Men
    • Dalrock
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Heartiste
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • Return of Kings
    • The Power Moves
    • The Rational Male
    • The Spearhead
    • Other

      • Alpha Game
      • Archwinger
      • Artful Prudence
      • Black Label Logic
      • Caleb Jones
      • Captain Capitalism
      • Corporate Machiavelli
      • Days of Game
      • Deep Strength
      • Dicipres
      • Donal Graeme
      • Female Misogynist
      • Free Northerner
      • Gaming My Wife
      • Hawaiian Libertarian
      • Illimitable Men
      • In Mala Fide
      • Justice for Men and Boys
      • Kill Your Inner Loser
      • KillToParty
      • Krauser PUA
      • LaidNYC
      • Mensactivism
      • NO MA'AM
      • Omega Virgin Revolt
      • Pook's Mill
      • Random Xpat Rantings
      • Red Pill Theory
      • Red Pill Wifery
      • RedPillDad
      • RedPillDoctor
      • Rian Stone
      • RooshV
      • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
      • Sigma Frame
      • The Feminine Woman
      • The Futurist
      • The Masculine Principle
      • The Modern Man
      • The New Modern Man
      • The Obsidian Files
      • The Private Man
      • The Red Pill Room
      • The Red Quest
      • The Rules Revisited
      • Troy Francis
      • Wintery Knight
      • Woujo
      • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Support

Did "women in tech" push cause largest security breach in history ... after female chief security officer with degree in fine arts screws up, well, everything? "Equifax Chief Information Security Officer Was An Affirmative Action Hire"

AndrewLevin

September 17, 2017
307 upvotes
/r/MensRights
http://www.thelibertyconservative.com/equifax-chief-information-security-officer-was-an-affirmative-action-hire/
Archived from /r/MensRights

r/MensRights is a community advocating for the social and legal equality of men and boys since 2008.

TheRedArchive is an archive of Red Pill subreddits and blogs. This page is our copy of the original post.

/r/MensRights archive

Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Support the archive

Everything here was supposed to disappear. Banned subreddits, deleted communities, cancelled blogs — much of what is archived here survives nowhere else.

It stays free — no paywall, no account — for the next man who comes looking, the way it was free for you.

I pay for the servers, the storage and the bandwidth myself. If you want this record still standing in ten years, become one of the people who keeps it online.

Support the archive

Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title Did "women in tech" push cause largest security breach in history ... after female chief security officer with degree in fine arts screws up, well, everything? "Equifax Chief Information Security Officer Was An Affirmative Action Hire"
Author

AndrewLevin

Upvotes 307
Comments 64
Date September 17, 2017 11:10 PM UTC
(8 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/70qzuo/did_women_in_tech_push_cause_largest_security/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/did-women-in-tech-push-cause-largest-security.914228
https://theredarchive.com/post/914228
Top posts by AndrewLevin

Female probation officer sexually assaults two detained boys (aka caged children). Word "rape" never used, of course.

4277 upvotes
September 30, 2017
/r/MensRights

"Delta passenger claims intoxicated woman groped him before flight" Show picture of victim but not perpetrator? Way to go ...

3157 upvotes
April 5, 2018
/r/MensRights

Viral video: Mom savagely beats 9yr old daughter for "crime" of talking to father. Father begged authorities to protect her from violent mom, but nobody cared (until he got video).

3104 upvotes
January 17, 2017
/r/MensRights

Hawaii proposes "A Feminist Economic Recovery Plan for COVID-19". Contains dozens of women only benefits, including a higher minimum wage (only for women) and better healthcare (only for women).

2902 upvotes
August 5, 2020
/r/MensRights

India executes only men since 1955. Woman hills 7 people (including children) and is sentenced to death. CNN blames patriarchy: "women who violate entrenched norms of gender behavior are more likely to receive the death penalty." If no woman has ever been executed, how do they conclude this?

2175 upvotes
April 26, 2021
/r/MensRights

Just a reminder that governments have always controlled men using their instinct to protect women

1944 upvotes
February 18, 2021
/r/MensRights

"Female physics teacher, 29, accused of sex romp with teen boy student" -- Can you imagine a male raping a child being called a "romp"?

1835 upvotes
April 28, 2018
/r/MensRights

New Covid19 stimulus bill has 15 women-only provisions, ZERO men-only provisions. For example, grants to help small businesses "shall prioritize awarding grants to eligible entities that are small business concerns owned controlled by women."

1738 upvotes
February 21, 2021
/r/MensRights

Comments

[–]Historybuffman 77 points78 points79 points 8 years ago (20 children) | Copy Link

I have always thought Affirmative Action was one of the worst ideas humans have ever had.

Qualified people? Nah, not enough (blacks, women, other) here. Let's get us some of them.

Seriously?

Then, how would you feel when you got that job? They only hired you because you met some diversity criteria, but (probably) would have never got the job otherwise. Just try not to think about, I guess?

It is just insulting to everyone.

[–]andejoh 16 points17 points18 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I have always thought Affirmative Action was one of the worst ideas humans have ever had.

And people never seem to "put their money where their mouth is" do they? They always seem to want someone else to do it. I've never heard one demand a "minority" surgeon if they needed open heart surgery for example. At times like these, qualifications seem to matter most, but they'll demand the hospital hire more "minority" surgeons not considering or caring whether there are any qualified candidates available.

[–]Istalriblaka 10 points11 points12 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Tbh if I had to pick the race of my doctor I'd pick Asian. Due to affirmative action, fewer Asian applicants are accepted into med school than even Caucasian applicants. As such their standards are notably higher.

All other minorities are underrepresented in applicants, causing a larger portion of applicants to be accepted.

[–]_pulsar 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

AA is sickening regardless of the field but medical school?? That's a whole different level of fucked up.

[–]Jackoffalltrades89 29 points30 points31 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It is perniciously evil at every level. It undermines the validity of individual people of the "affirmatively acted" class by adding tokenism into the selection pool, making themselves and others have to wonder if they earned the position/opportunity/what have you, or if it was given to them. It degrades the popular opinion of that group by way of assuming people of that group must need help and are therefore inferior to the average. It hurts people not of the "affected" group who may actually be more affected by forcing a non-uniform priority based on set characteristics (e.g. race-based affirmative action, Hispanic vs black vs Native American. A major focus of AA in the US is on, well, African Americans when you can argue that the Native American population has been much more thoroughly fucked by the US.) It hurts people "opposite" the affected group by denying them a position they would otherwise be qualified for (e.g. men v women.) Hell, it even hurts individuals of the affected group far more directly by placing them into positions they may not be ready for. The washout rate for affirmative action placed students in Ivy League universities is something like an order of magnitude higher than any other demographic. Which when you think about it, is the only possible result. If you get a boost on your scores based on a non-academic credential, that doesn't mean you're going to magically be to the same academic standard as your new peers that the course work will be built towards. Which in turn means being stuck at the back of the pack and watching helplessly as it pulls farther and farther away from you.

Or in short, Affirmative Action Is Evil.

[–]sonofsuperman1983 8 points9 points10 points 8 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Science industry is now the same especially in research. Regardless of who is best for the job if a women applies your chance of getting that job as a qualified male drops significantly. Been told by many female researcher the only reason they got the job is because of their gender.

[–]Istalriblaka 9 points10 points11 points 8 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

"If you're a female in engineering, you should not have to pay for college."

-My Intro to Engineering and Design teacher in high school, referring to affirmative action scholarships and grants that already existed.

And now I'm stuck here working 20 hours a week to pay for my 19 credit hours while trying to maintain a 3.0 for the partial scholarships I do have.

[–]sonofsuperman1983 11 points12 points13 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Pussy pass on life. Discriminated against because you have a penis. In the UK it is now known that the most disadvantaged are single white males. This was not purposeful but due to long term neglect as we focused on the rights of individual minority groups rather than human rights.

[–]Istalriblaka 3 points4 points5 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It's pretty much the same across the pond, except it's not common knowledge and the most disadvantaged are the poor white people. Becaause everyone cares about Detroit and Flint, but not a single shit is given about Appalachia.

[–]FastFourierTerraform 5 points6 points7 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

And when it comes time to actually compete with them in the real world, no one can figure out why the men tend to outperform them. Compare someone who took a cushy scholarship in a field they were kind of interested in, to someone working their ass off every day to achieve their dream.

[–]homer4215 points 8 years ago* [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link

An insult is a passing comment, double charged, even a false ticket. Ruining your credit, purchasing power, and emptying your bank accounts is a whole different ball of wax.

[–]JoeBender1 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I've got a head start on them ... my credit sucks, my purchasing power is nil, and my bank account is empty less than 24 hours after my paycheck hits.

So neener neener neener ...

/joke ... my whole life is a joke.

[–]SpikedGIraffe 3 points4 points5 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Qualified people? Nah, not enough (blacks, women, other) here. Let's get us some of them.

As some one who qualifies under Affirmative Action(Employment Equity in Canada) I find it insulting. I purposefully did not disclose my disability for just that reason. I wanted to be hired for what I can do, not to fit some diversity quota.

[–]Spooky_Hillbilly 10 points11 points12 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Well, let's look at the reality of the situation.

In a nutshell:

Before Affirmative Action, many companies used to hire based on some form of an IQ test. This was ruled unconstitutional, as it was deemed to be racist. Not enough Hispanics and Blacks were able to pass these tests.

Fast forward to Affirmative Action:

It is just insulting to everyone.

No. Not if you aren't smart enough to be insulted.

If that were the case, they would be insulted when democrats say "voter ID laws are racist", because in essence, what they're really saying is minorities are too stupid to obtain an ID. The sad truth is that Blacks and Hispanics are getting gamed into being a voting crop, and most of them aren't sharp enough to realize it.

[–]GunOfSod 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The bigotry of low expectations.

[–]UNLIKELYME -1 points0 points1 point 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This comment could be relevant in this context or not. The article itself admits, sort of, that the title of the article is not correct.

[+][deleted] 8 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]mikesteane 5 points6 points7 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The first definition I found when searching under "affirmative action definition" was: 'action favouring those who tend to suffer from discrimination; positive discrimination.'

Which is what I thought it meant, it's not restricted to race.

[–]Historybuffman 3 points4 points5 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Nope.

[–]5th_Law_of_Robotics 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

It's race and gender.

[–]blette 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Hackers are sexist and racist. If you don't do your IT security job well, hackers won't go easy on you, even when you are a minority or a female. Those bastards aren't fair.

[–]mensmod[M] [score hidden] 8 years ago stickied comment (4 children) | Copy Link

For people who are not normally subscribers of /r/MensRights, understand that the argument being made here is NOT that women are bad employees in tech.

The argument being made here is that Affirmative Action pushes organizations to hire people based on gender, which can override or impede competency considerations. When that happens, the employee is more likely to make a mistake. Even if that didn't happen here, the presence of affirmative action policies will always undermine women employees.

There are consequences to such actions - since Affirmative Action influences the hiring of women, unqualified women in careers end up creating a higher fraction of mistakes by women employees and undermines the perception of women employees. i.e. if a higher fraction of women screw up, it makes it seem like women aren't good at that type of work and perpetuates stereotypes. This undermines the purpose of the affirmative action in the first place.

The solution to a lack of women in tech is to encourage women at a younger age to pursue careers in tech. However, adults are responsible for their decisions and once barriers to women in tech are removed, the relative employment rates of men vs women are a natural consequences of the interests of the individuals of the society.

[–]Tgunner192 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

once barriers to women in tech are removed

Is there really any other barrier besides, woman are interested in tech careers?

[–]mensmod -1 points0 points1 point 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

One would argue that the Uber situation could constitute a barrier to women. The perception that women are bad in the tech sector is a barrier to women. What someone else does shouldn't influence you.

Counter example that might resonate better with you: is the treatment of men in the justice system a barrier to men in our society? I would say yes. Men are treated as the default perpetrator by our legal system because statistically speaking they perpetrate more crimes. What OTHER men have done in the past is somehow affecting how YOU are treated as a man. This is a barrier to your fair treatment.

[+][deleted] 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]mensmod 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That is not relevant to what I said.

[–]perplexedm 11 points12 points13 points 8 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Equifax on Friday said that Susan Mauldin, chief security officer, and David Webb, chief information officer, were retiring.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-equifax-cyber-moves/equifax-two-top-technology-executives-leave-company-effective-immediately-idUSKCN1BQ2WN

Just like rats out of a sinking ship. Don't know whether she will get a huge severance package or a golden parachute.

[–]Nemobeenfound 6 points7 points8 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

A severance package is in this case a golden parachute at her level.

[+][deleted] 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]Nemobeenfound 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I'd like to think severance packages have incompetence clauses.

I take it you are young? Such a package would have no such clauses, it won't have any clauses at all as its not a contract. Her contract may have such a clause in it.

The board should get fucked if this woman gets a dime for severance.

When your that high up in the company that is how things work unfortunately. It be nice if c level execs got nothing for massive screwups but they do and its often tied to their contracts.

[–]crimsonkodiak 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Just like rats out of a sinking ship.

Rats leave of their own volition. These two were thrown overboard.

[–]5th_Law_of_Robotics 8 points9 points10 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I mean even if it was responsible that won't change anything.

The fact that they've lowered physical standards for firefighters to force equality means we as a society are ok with people literally dying rather than telling some women they aren't qualified for a certain job.

[–]UNLIKELYME 16 points17 points18 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Could this all have been done in an attempt to hide that the individual that Equifax put in charge of protecting 143 million American’s credit information was an affirmative action hire meant to meet some quota? That still remains to be seen,

And the title was:

Equifax Chief Information Security Officer Was An Affirmative Action Hire

Hmm, I don't trust liars all that much.

[–]GadolBoobies 3 points4 points5 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

highest education was two degrees in music

immediately hired into large scale positions and jump stepped quickly in very short years to unrelated departments

Yeah, totally isn't a diversity hire.

[–]Wholepowderedeggs 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yellow jouranalism at its finest. The more modern term is click bait.

[–]xydroh 6 points7 points8 points 8 years ago (13 children) | Copy Link

I've met some really bad CSO's, this doesn't have much to do with her degree but more with competence. I'm fine with having a degree in fine arts if she's got some experience in the field elsewhere since the cybersecurity field is only about 5 years old.

[–]Nemobeenfound 8 points9 points10 points 8 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

The field is older than that but its really only been more of an academic focus for about 5 or so years now.

[–]xydroh 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

Yes, that's what I meant. But even then, security was still a side field over 5 years ago. You wouldn't find much people that worked full time in security. It was security + sysadmin or some stuff like that.

[–]Nemobeenfound 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

It was security + sysadmin or some stuff like that.

Would more say the sysadmin was also the security guy and still is least at smaller companies and to various extent mid size companies (depending on the needs of the company).

[–]xydroh 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

For small companies yes, but medium/large sized companies have so much security regulations coming in that Security is already a full time job, and that's just the paperwork to cover the company in case of a hack.

[–]Nemobeenfound 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

Pretty sure there's really no security regulations to speak of least in the US. And a large company is going to have a security department but a medium size one may not depending on what they do and deal with. If a medium size company say does online sales then ya they likely have a small security department. But if they don't then they likely not going to.

[–]xydroh 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

I can't speak about the US, but in the EU, you can get fines up to 10% of the yearly income if you get hacked and can't prove the security was up to a decent standard. Also companies with government contracties need to be pentested( ethical hackers that show flaws) Also yearly security audits will be implemented. I don't know US regulation but EU is going hard on this one.

[–]Nemobeenfound 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

To my knowledge there's basically no regulation here. But to be honest it kinda self regulates itself. As even tho there's no law saying companies must have security they do it out of need and necessity. As companies rely on consumer trust especially today for business with so much of it online.

[–]xydroh 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

If you are working with data that affects peoples personal lives if this were hacked, this lends itself to be regulated in some way. There has to be a legal platform that defines who's to blame in case your SSN gets leaked, who gets to repay damages etc.

[–]Nemobeenfound 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

There is and here with Equifax its break of contract I believe. Just keep tabs on the lawsuit(s) and what they sue for. There's laws for things like leaking personal info but pretty sure all of those laws existed before cyber security existed.

[–]xydroh1 point 8 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Well here in EU all of those laws can be adverted because of technicalities that's why there's new cybersecurity laws etc. The first sentenced hacker was actually sent to prison for "theft of electricity" because they had no other law to prosecute him under.

[–]Nemobeenfound1 point 8 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Read up on Kevin Mitnick. I mention him as the US had no actual computer crime laws on the books at the time he was arrested, they since do but laws predating the internet where used against him successfully. Point is the US has various old laws that are still applicable today. This is despite them not being updated even. As I said follow the lawsuit(s) from this.

[–]the-capitan 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

netsec is over 30 years old. back then it was phreaking and phishing and colorbox. this woman is a joke.

nowadays, anyone who can't code shouldn't be in infosec. here you have a CSO of one of the largest credit agencies, with ridiculously vulnerable data, and she can't write a line of code. how the fuck do you think she's going to know what to do to stop hackers?

[–]xydroh 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

She sure is, but sadly there's as much or even more male CSO's that are just as bad in the field. And the 5 year old field I was refering to academic field of study, security itself is ofcourse older than that.

[–]Ted8367 14 points15 points16 points 8 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

Did "women in tech" push cause largest security breach in history?

It might have contributed some, but (IMO) it probably wasn't much.

Chief Information Security Officer Susan Mauldin was a music major in college.

The commentator "Red" put it best:

CyberSecurity is not an industry which anchors on academia for one very simple reason. It’s only existed as an academic field for what, 5-10 years? Maybe what, 3%? 5%? of people working in the Security Industry have ‘formal cybersecurity’ academic qualifications. In my 15 years in the field I think I’ve met one. So, I think you’re off-base this time. Plenty of blame to go around, but her educational background is a red-herring.

Also, she had had other jobs after college:

Equifax, which is a credit reporting agency, hired Mauldin as their Chief Information Security Officer in 2013. Previously, Mauldin was the Senior Vice President and Chief Security Officer at First Data Corporation until 2013. Prior to that, she was also SunTrust Banks’ Group Vice President from 2007 to 2009.

So, from the resume, not so unthinkable.

This is supported by the fact that the security breach and the handling of it since then both indicate that Susan Mauldin had no idea what she was doing.

Similar to some male managers I have known.

[–]dermac 7 points8 points9 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Similar to some male managers I have known.

With the difference that there is no push to get them into good positions.

[–]the-capitan 10 points11 points12 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

people with CS backgrounds run circles around people without when it comes to infosec. it's not even close. this woman was wildly unqualified to handle the credit data of one of the largest credit agencies on the planet.

[–]Istalriblaka 4 points5 points6 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I was gonna say, I'm pretty sure someone with a hobby-level interest in programming would know not to have "admin" as a username and password.

[–]vonthe 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I have worked as a senior DBA for big dollar companies for many years now, and I wasn't surprised. This is way more common than you'd think. I'll not go into any details because NDA and liability and professional ethics prevent it, but this level of laxity is actually common.

Not excusable, but common.

[–]DontTrustRedditors 4 points5 points6 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Also, she had had other jobs after college:

Proof is in the pudding, bub. She's responsible for the biggest fuck-up the field has ever experienced. That means she sucks at her job.

I don't get idiots like you trying to convince us that someone who is manifestly bad at their job--because they failed miserable at it--is actually super qualified.

Before this happened, yours would be the 'simple' answer. Now, that she's a shit diversity hire is the 'simple' answer. Because she fucked it all up.

[–]Nemobeenfound 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

So many people think that you can only get a job that your degree is in and not realize you can go elsewhere in a totally different direction with your degree. Yes an education in the field of computers would be more preferable. But there's various programmers out there without a degree in programing with a job as a programmer. I can only imagine there are programmers with degrees totally outside of computers.

[–]_LadyBoy 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I dare say, most jobs in cyber sec require people to have degrees in tech.... just saying.

[–]Nemobeenfound 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Not if you can show you know your stuff or have certs in say Cisco. Its not a field that actually outright demands one to have a degree especially when academically such degrees only been around for like the past 5 years.

[–]Ashenox 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It's almost as if when you hire some one for their gender or skin color instead of ability to do the job shit goes south. Who would have thought!

[–]KinglyWeevil 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Pretty sure this has more to do with nepotism than affirmative action.

[–]serial_crusher 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It's a bit of a stretch. Never underestimate the ability of a big corporation to promote somebody incompetent to the highest levels, regardless of the incompetent person's gender.

Given the complete lack of evidence here, a feminist could just as easily say that this lady had it right and everybody else in the organization ignored her. Institutional sexism caused this! What, you can't prove that didn't happen, so maybe that's what happened.

Unless you have an email thread where they discuss hiring her over another candidate, or some other form of proof, it's best to just assume this is any other case of corporate incompetence, not confirmation of everything you suspected all along.

[–]swallonyall 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I work(ed) in security and this woman's background was thrown through the ringer because of the outcomes of her company. She deserves criticism, sure, but not for her education. The reality is that in the age when she was going through college there was no such thing as a cybersecurity major, and most folks moved into the field from other areas.

[–]Blind_Topics 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I think women in tech are great, and it's unfortunate they have to deal with all the BS in addition to all the work BS. https://us.teamblind.com/article/what-do-you-think-of-women-in-tech-n88OAJV8

[–]ee4m -1 points0 points1 point 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

"Liberty conservative"- this libertarian stuff is class warfare against the average man.

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter