TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

andejoh Archive

View 1,082 posts and 4,377 comments by andejoh on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
4768

Discriminationandejoh/r/MensRights18/12/18 05:02 PM
2599

False Accusationandejoh/r/MensRights02/03/18 06:00 AM
2463

Discriminationandejoh/r/MensRights05/10/17 02:33 AM
2397

Progressandejoh/r/MensRights24/12/18 03:09 AM
2345

Discriminationandejoh/r/MensRights14/07/21 06:06 PM
2119

Marriage/Divorceandejoh/r/MensRights12/04/17 08:19 AM
1798

Discriminationandejoh/r/MensRights21/06/21 03:45 PM
1574

Discriminationandejoh/r/MensRights25/07/21 04:33 PM
1524

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights01/11/20 04:36 PM
1494

False Accusationandejoh/r/MensRights20/04/18 05:52 AM
1473

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights06/06/18 08:51 AM
1470

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights20/05/18 08:10 PM
1451

Discriminationandejoh/r/MensRights27/10/21 04:11 PM
1375

Progressandejoh/r/MensRights12/07/21 11:31 PM
1280

Edu./Occu.andejoh/r/MensRights19/05/19 12:35 AM
1259

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights27/11/19 04:07 AM
1248

Legal Rightsandejoh/r/MensRights30/04/17 06:58 AM
1243

Generalandejoh/r/MensRights30/06/21 02:58 PM
1235

Activism/Supportandejoh/r/MensRights05/08/17 07:39 AM
1213

False Accusationandejoh/r/MensRights13/03/21 12:12 AM
1085

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights13/03/18 03:28 AM
1047

andejoh/r/MensRights22/09/16 01:01 AM
944

Discriminationandejoh/r/MensRights06/05/22 03:32 PM
941

Progressandejoh/r/MensRights14/12/20 11:12 PM
886

False Accusationandejoh/r/MensRights11/12/17 06:08 AM
857

andejoh/r/MensRights19/09/16 02:34 AM
823

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights01/10/18 04:06 AM
803

Discriminationandejoh/r/MensRights31/03/20 10:59 AM
786

Feminismandejoh/r/MensRights14/03/20 10:09 PM
786

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights18/08/18 07:12 PM
705

False Accusationandejoh/r/MensRights11/04/17 06:55 AM
646

Healthandejoh/r/MensRights11/06/21 12:35 PM
604

False Accusationandejoh/r/MensRights10/09/18 11:52 PM
585

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights30/03/21 03:19 AM
574

Legal Rightsandejoh/r/MensRights03/05/18 12:32 AM
569

Generalandejoh/r/MensRights18/08/21 01:17 AM
529

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights12/02/18 09:17 AM
524

Progressandejoh/r/MensRights23/11/19 06:22 PM
519

Discriminationandejoh/r/MensRights16/05/22 04:43 PM
517

Activism/Supportandejoh/r/MensRights28/01/19 04:18 AM
471

Legal Rightsandejoh/r/MensRights18/06/21 03:22 AM
457

Edu./Occu.andejoh/r/MensRights17/02/18 10:39 AM
423

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights04/07/21 01:09 AM
422

False Accusationandejoh/r/MensRights09/06/18 03:41 AM
406

andejoh/r/MensRights04/02/17 09:58 PM
394

Discriminationandejoh/r/MensRights25/01/16 02:01 AM
394

andejoh/r/MensRights18/02/17 09:07 AM
390

Progressandejoh/r/MensRights16/05/22 04:56 PM
375

Intactivismandejoh/r/MensRights17/02/19 09:19 AM
354

Edu./Occu.andejoh/r/MensRights30/12/18 12:27 AM
353

Marriage/Childrenandejoh/r/MensRights27/03/22 10:22 PM
351

Discriminationandejoh/r/MensRights16/10/19 01:13 AM
339

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights13/06/21 05:59 AM
338

False Accusationandejoh/r/MensRights22/02/18 01:17 PM
335

False Accusationandejoh/r/MensRights25/03/18 05:08 PM
334

Discriminationandejoh/r/MensRights23/10/20 05:26 PM
334

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights06/03/18 03:33 AM
329

Legal Rightsandejoh/r/MensRights07/10/17 08:54 PM
324

Discriminationandejoh/r/MensRights04/08/15 09:54 PM
318

Legal Rightsandejoh/r/MensRights27/07/21 11:06 PM
316

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights20/06/16 10:52 PM
312

False Accusationandejoh/r/MensRights28/08/19 04:12 PM
309

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights04/06/20 04:03 PM
307

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights05/08/18 12:16 AM
296

andejoh/r/MensRights19/06/18 11:51 PM
288

Discriminationandejoh/r/MensRights14/11/20 09:47 AM
285

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights27/12/18 07:06 PM
284

Discriminationandejoh/r/MensRights04/07/21 05:16 PM
284

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights09/08/18 12:12 AM
281

Discriminationandejoh/r/MensRights17/04/17 08:07 PM
277

andejoh/r/MensRights11/03/17 03:05 AM
271

Feminismandejoh/r/MensRights06/04/16 09:47 PM
268

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights31/10/19 09:40 PM
266

False Accusationandejoh/r/MensRights11/07/18 01:02 AM
265

Feminismandejoh/r/MensRights04/08/18 06:27 AM
264

Progressandejoh/r/MensRights18/06/21 06:29 PM
262

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights16/04/24 06:03 AM
260

False Accusationandejoh/r/MensRights11/08/21 04:55 PM
259

False Accusationandejoh/r/MensRights15/06/21 10:02 PM
258

andejoh/r/MensRights27/07/16 09:35 AM
256

andejoh/r/MensRights12/01/17 05:01 AM
255

Progressandejoh/r/MensRights26/11/19 01:38 AM
254

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights05/02/16 04:23 PM
253

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights16/03/18 07:38 PM
252

andejoh/r/MensRights05/03/17 11:07 PM
250

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights12/08/19 11:00 PM
248

Generalandejoh/r/MensRights19/08/21 04:48 AM
245

False Accusationandejoh/r/MensRights25/05/19 10:23 AM
243

Progressandejoh/r/MensRights03/08/17 09:13 AM
242

Generalandejoh/r/MensRights25/02/16 09:03 PM
237

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights04/06/18 09:04 AM
231

Fathers/Custodyandejoh/r/MensRights12/04/17 11:21 PM
228

Discriminationandejoh/r/MensRights20/01/16 10:56 PM
227

andejoh/r/MensRights28/09/16 01:11 AM
226

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights05/04/16 02:47 AM
225

andejoh/r/MensRights27/04/19 02:18 AM
221

Discriminationandejoh/r/MensRights15/01/22 05:45 PM
215

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights04/04/18 11:46 PM
214

Discriminationandejoh/r/MensRights07/11/18 09:42 PM
213

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights24/04/20 05:31 AM
212

Discriminationandejoh/r/MensRights21/07/19 09:42 PM
212

Feminismandejoh/r/MensRights26/03/18 12:22 AM
212

False Accusationandejoh/r/MensRights20/10/22 06:39 AM
211

Generalandejoh/r/MensRights03/08/17 11:31 AM
207

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights21/08/19 07:31 PM
203

Discriminationandejoh/r/MensRights04/03/18 08:38 PM
202

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights13/03/18 12:46 PM
197

Discriminationandejoh/r/MensRights04/03/19 04:47 AM
195

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights20/08/18 05:43 PM
193

andejoh/r/MensRights27/02/16 01:38 PM
193

Legal Rightsandejoh/r/MensRights18/10/19 05:33 PM
187

Discriminationandejoh/r/MensRights27/02/20 03:22 AM
187

andejoh/r/MensRights02/10/16 05:13 AM
186

Legal Rightsandejoh/r/MensRights08/04/18 08:22 PM
186

Generalandejoh/r/MensRights07/09/21 06:17 PM
184

andejoh/r/MensRights11/01/17 06:19 AM
183

Progressandejoh/r/MensRights14/04/20 06:41 PM
182

Discriminationandejoh/r/MensRights14/04/20 07:08 PM
181

Marriage/Childrenandejoh/r/MensRights05/07/19 09:25 PM
170

andejoh/r/MensRights01/10/16 05:42 AM
168

Legal Rightsandejoh/r/MensRights07/12/15 08:46 PM
167

andejoh/r/MensRights03/05/16 02:04 PM
167

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights23/08/15 03:59 PM
163

Discriminationandejoh/r/MensRights14/08/24 04:23 PM
163

Discriminationandejoh/r/MensRights03/04/21 06:30 PM
158

Legal Rightsandejoh/r/MensRights21/06/15 04:14 PM
157

Intactivismandejoh/r/MensRights30/07/18 06:15 PM
155

Activism/Supportandejoh/r/MensRights29/06/16 06:32 AM
155

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights02/02/18 01:44 AM
154

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights02/05/19 02:23 PM
149

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights01/12/17 07:43 AM
149

Marriage/Childrenandejoh/r/MensRights04/05/18 04:22 PM
146

Marriage/Childrenandejoh/r/MensRights23/12/17 04:24 AM
146

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights06/07/17 11:17 PM
146

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights02/12/18 06:43 PM
144

andejoh/r/MensRights30/10/16 01:03 PM
141

False Accusationandejoh/r/MensRights22/04/18 05:12 PM
139

False Accusationandejoh/r/MensRights03/11/18 03:50 AM
138

Legal Rightsandejoh/r/MensRights06/04/17 06:25 AM
138

Intactivismandejoh/r/MensRights21/06/21 03:22 PM
136

False Accusationandejoh/r/MensRights24/03/18 11:14 PM
136

Discriminationandejoh/r/MensRights16/03/20 04:21 AM
135

Discriminationandejoh/r/MensRights13/01/22 01:50 PM
135

Discriminationandejoh/r/MensRights11/12/19 06:12 PM
134

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights03/09/18 03:19 PM
134

andejoh/r/MensRights26/09/16 02:38 AM
131

Discriminationandejoh/r/MensRights19/06/18 11:45 AM
131

Discriminationandejoh/r/MensRights19/06/18 01:12 AM
130

andejoh/r/MensRights21/11/16 11:10 PM
130

Legal Rightsandejoh/r/MensRights07/12/19 03:06 PM
130

Edu./Occu.andejoh/r/MensRights08/11/18 10:33 PM
130

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights15/06/18 04:12 AM
129

andejoh/r/MensRights12/02/16 03:05 PM
128

andejoh/r/MensRights18/06/18 12:02 PM
127

Edu./Occu.andejoh/r/MensRights10/06/18 06:58 AM
127

Legal Rightsandejoh/r/MensRights02/11/20 06:10 PM
127

andejoh/r/MensRights08/02/16 09:38 PM
126

Discriminationandejoh/r/MensRights08/06/21 07:20 PM
125

Legal Rightsandejoh/r/MensRights22/11/18 04:01 AM
125

Legal Rightsandejoh/r/MensRights19/03/18 08:22 PM
125

Marriage/Childrenandejoh/r/MensRights26/05/18 08:22 PM
122

Legal Rightsandejoh/r/MensRights23/08/19 12:34 AM
122

Legal Rightsandejoh/r/MensRights15/03/20 03:54 AM
122

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights11/10/19 07:36 PM
121

andejoh/r/MensRights22/06/18 05:55 AM
121

Legal Rightsandejoh/r/MensRights11/11/19 03:11 PM
120

Marriage/Childrenandejoh/r/MensRights06/01/18 08:21 AM
119

Generalandejoh/r/MensRights04/06/22 03:25 PM
119

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights03/09/17 03:31 PM
117

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights18/09/17 03:31 AM
115

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights10/10/18 03:57 PM
114

Discriminationandejoh/r/MensRights14/02/16 03:40 AM
114

False Accusationandejoh/r/MensRights25/09/20 05:51 AM
114

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights22/08/15 03:29 PM
113

Discriminationandejoh/r/MensRights20/01/20 04:35 AM
113

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights01/04/19 09:00 AM
111

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights01/03/18 08:10 PM
111

andejoh/r/MensRights02/01/17 07:16 PM
111

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights09/08/22 06:28 AM
110

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights18/12/15 06:06 PM
110

andejoh/r/MensRights17/09/16 02:45 AM
110

andejoh/r/MensRights16/12/16 11:03 PM
109

Discriminationandejoh/r/MensRights15/08/19 01:33 AM
109

Legal Rightsandejoh/r/MensRights07/09/18 04:24 PM
107

Discriminationandejoh/r/MensRights01/09/21 05:16 AM
107

False Accusationandejoh/r/MensRights08/05/18 01:34 AM
106

False Accusationandejoh/r/MensRights18/08/18 10:26 PM
105

andejoh/r/MensRights15/02/17 02:35 AM
105

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights14/07/18 08:34 PM
105

andejoh/r/MensRights27/07/16 09:30 AM
105

Edu./Occu.andejoh/r/MensRights16/04/17 12:04 AM
104

False Accusationandejoh/r/MensRights18/08/15 02:02 AM
103

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights09/07/21 04:22 PM
103

andejoh/r/MensRights03/07/16 08:18 PM
103

False Accusationandejoh/r/MensRights07/07/21 08:24 PM
102

Generalandejoh/r/MensRights26/04/20 07:43 PM
102

Intactivismandejoh/r/MensRights25/02/20 04:13 PM
102

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights31/08/18 04:38 AM
101

Marriage/Childrenandejoh/r/MensRights25/04/19 10:46 PM
100

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights19/03/22 03:21 PM
100

Activism/Supportandejoh/r/MensRights10/01/22 10:48 PM
100

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights14/04/17 03:05 AM
98

Legal Rightsandejoh/r/MensRights27/07/21 10:01 PM
98

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights07/12/17 07:13 AM
97

Generalandejoh/r/MensRights05/01/16 02:56 PM
97

andejoh/r/MensRights11/03/16 05:43 PM
97

False Accusationandejoh/r/MensRights21/06/20 03:11 AM
95

Discriminationandejoh/r/MensRights01/06/17 08:08 PM
95

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights17/03/21 08:53 PM
95

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights02/12/20 07:05 PM
95

False Accusationandejoh/r/MensRights08/02/20 07:54 AM
95

Discriminationandejoh/r/MensRights20/05/19 02:16 AM
94

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights30/04/22 07:28 PM
94

Legal Rightsandejoh/r/MensRights14/09/17 09:46 PM
94

Legal Rightsandejoh/r/MensRights24/06/21 08:26 PM
93

False Accusationandejoh/r/MensRights09/06/18 03:59 AM
93

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights24/09/18 06:40 AM
92

Progressandejoh/r/MensRights01/05/25 03:15 PM
91

Discriminationandejoh/r/MensRights19/06/23 08:18 PM
91

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights17/07/17 08:02 PM
91

Legal Rightsandejoh/r/MensRights02/02/19 08:01 AM
91

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights14/12/20 08:21 PM
89

False Accusationandejoh/r/MensRights01/06/18 01:03 AM
89

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights29/01/18 12:14 PM
89

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights11/07/17 08:05 AM
88

Feminismandejoh/r/MensRights23/04/18 07:52 AM
88

Discriminationandejoh/r/MensRights16/03/20 04:53 AM
87

Discriminationandejoh/r/MensRights08/06/21 07:03 PM
87

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights29/06/20 01:54 AM
85

Feminismandejoh/r/MensRights12/01/20 09:21 PM
85

Legal Rightsandejoh/r/MensRights16/04/19 07:04 PM
85

Legal Rightsandejoh/r/MensRights23/11/19 10:51 PM
84

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights04/04/19 04:00 AM
84

Feminismandejoh/r/MensRights16/04/17 07:19 AM
83

Discriminationandejoh/r/MensRights18/11/19 12:44 AM
83

Discriminationandejoh/r/MensRights08/06/21 07:15 PM
83

andejoh/r/MensRights09/12/16 09:56 PM
83

Discriminationandejoh/r/MensRights09/07/22 06:14 AM
83

andejoh/r/MensRights01/04/17 10:54 PM
83

Feminismandejoh/r/MensRights27/05/17 06:44 AM
82

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights28/11/19 04:04 AM
82

False Accusationandejoh/r/MensRights28/01/19 04:10 AM
82

Legal Rightsandejoh/r/MensRights17/03/18 10:44 PM
81

Discriminationandejoh/r/MensRights16/03/18 02:14 AM
81

andejoh/r/MensRights23/04/17 07:33 AM
81

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights14/02/20 02:49 PM
80

Legal Rightsandejoh/r/MensRights14/04/18 05:47 AM
80

Marriage/Childrenandejoh/r/MensRights21/07/19 09:11 PM
79

andejoh/r/MensRights12/02/17 01:40 AM
79

Progressandejoh/r/MensRights16/09/18 01:54 AM
79

andejoh/r/MensRights10/07/16 09:45 PM
78

Marriage/Childrenandejoh/r/MensRights14/06/18 02:17 AM
78

Feminismandejoh/r/MensRights25/06/21 12:34 PM
78

Legal Rightsandejoh/r/MensRights22/08/18 09:41 PM
77

Legal Rightsandejoh/r/MensRights05/05/19 02:54 PM
77

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights16/10/19 10:25 PM
77

Feminismandejoh/r/MensRights07/09/19 01:10 AM
76

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights03/09/19 08:40 PM
76

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights04/06/18 09:29 AM
76

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights04/09/15 10:14 PM
75

andejoh/r/MensRights23/06/18 05:23 AM
75

andejoh/r/MensRights12/01/17 06:18 AM
75

andejoh/r/MensRights09/12/16 10:47 PM
75

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights20/09/18 06:41 PM
74

Marriage/Childrenandejoh/r/MensRights04/05/19 01:51 PM
74

Feminismandejoh/r/MensRights06/03/18 03:07 PM
74

False Accusationandejoh/r/MensRights20/08/19 12:39 AM
73

andejoh/r/MensRights30/06/18 08:29 AM
73

Discriminationandejoh/r/MensRights01/03/18 02:48 AM
73

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights15/01/20 05:16 AM
72

andejoh/r/MensRights20/04/19 01:56 PM
71

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights22/09/17 01:58 PM
71

Legal Rightsandejoh/r/MensRights18/02/19 02:37 AM
71

Marriage/Childrenandejoh/r/MensRights25/05/19 02:06 AM
69

Edu./Occu.andejoh/r/MensRights28/03/18 09:35 AM
69

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights05/09/15 04:11 PM
69

Legal Rightsandejoh/r/MensRights29/03/20 04:12 PM
69

Edu./Occu.andejoh/r/MensRights16/01/18 06:17 AM
69

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights24/02/20 03:16 AM
69

Discriminationandejoh/r/MensRights26/10/17 02:54 AM
68

Edu./Occu.andejoh/r/MensRights26/06/18 12:44 PM
68

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights11/03/18 05:45 PM
67

Discriminationandejoh/r/MensRights23/05/19 04:27 AM
67

False Accusationandejoh/r/MensRights13/07/21 07:42 PM
67

Legal Rightsandejoh/r/MensRights14/02/20 04:17 AM
67

andejoh/r/MensRights28/06/16 12:10 AM
67

Marriage/Childrenandejoh/r/MensRights06/04/19 04:08 PM
67

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights14/02/19 07:21 AM
67

Discriminationandejoh/r/MensRights21/06/21 03:05 PM
67

Edu./Occu.andejoh/r/MensRights14/08/18 08:12 AM
66

Edu./Occu.andejoh/r/MensRights02/02/19 06:02 AM
66

Discriminationandejoh/r/MensRights05/03/18 05:01 PM
66

Marriage/Childrenandejoh/r/MensRights09/02/18 01:20 PM
66

Discriminationandejoh/r/MensRights04/08/15 10:00 PM
65

andejoh/r/MensRights15/09/16 03:24 PM
65

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights13/03/21 12:04 AM
65

andejoh/r/MensRights19/04/17 06:12 AM
65

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights26/02/18 02:37 PM
65

andejoh/r/MensRights28/12/16 01:56 AM
64

Activism/Supportandejoh/r/MensRights27/09/19 11:24 PM
64

Legal Rightsandejoh/r/MensRights02/03/22 09:13 PM
64

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights15/02/18 03:24 PM
64

Discriminationandejoh/r/MensRights29/03/18 10:24 PM
64

Discriminationandejoh/r/MensRights13/04/20 04:45 AM
63

Discriminationandejoh/r/MensRights14/10/17 04:27 PM
63

Eastern Cultureandejoh/r/MensRights22/12/15 10:03 PM
63

Discriminationandejoh/r/MensRights11/06/21 05:55 PM
63

andejoh/r/MensRights13/11/16 02:40 AM
62

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights27/09/18 10:25 PM
62

andejoh/r/MensRights14/10/16 06:52 AM
62

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights23/08/18 12:40 AM
62

Legal Rightsandejoh/r/MensRights11/10/18 10:50 PM
61

Fathers/Custodyandejoh/r/MensRights19/06/17 07:02 AM
61

Edu./Occu.andejoh/r/MensRights14/10/17 07:50 AM
61

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights01/06/21 04:33 AM
60

False Accusationandejoh/r/MensRights22/11/18 04:11 AM
60

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights11/06/20 06:05 PM
60

False Accusationandejoh/r/MensRights10/05/18 08:41 AM
60

Legal Rightsandejoh/r/MensRights24/06/21 08:34 PM
60

Edu./Occu.andejoh/r/MensRights27/05/17 07:02 AM
60

Healthandejoh/r/MensRights28/10/19 11:26 PM
60

False Accusationandejoh/r/MensRights09/08/18 02:33 AM
59

andejoh/r/MensRights07/10/16 02:29 PM
59

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights13/05/16 06:26 PM
59

False Accusationandejoh/r/MensRights20/01/19 07:30 PM
58

Edu./Occu.andejoh/r/MensRights03/04/18 02:18 AM
58

False Accusationandejoh/r/MensRights03/12/21 12:10 AM
58

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights24/08/18 10:13 PM
58

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights31/03/18 06:16 PM
58

False Accusationandejoh/r/MensRights15/09/17 09:08 PM
58

False Accusationandejoh/r/MensRights13/10/17 04:54 AM
58

Marriage/Childrenandejoh/r/MensRights13/08/19 12:21 AM
58

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights12/05/22 07:12 AM
58

andejoh/r/MensRights08/02/16 04:59 PM
58

Edu./Occu.andejoh/r/MensRights29/11/15 04:58 PM
58

False Accusationandejoh/r/MensRights07/12/15 07:12 PM
58

Activism/Supportandejoh/r/MensRights05/03/18 05:13 PM
57

Discriminationandejoh/r/MensRights14/10/17 11:20 PM
57

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights14/10/17 07:31 PM
57

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights27/03/18 01:10 AM
57

Discriminationandejoh/r/MensRights26/12/18 01:09 AM
57

andejoh/r/MensRights10/04/17 03:48 AM
56

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights10/12/15 08:29 PM
56

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights13/03/18 07:38 PM
56

False Accusationandejoh/r/MensRights26/01/20 06:56 AM
56

andejoh/r/MensRights14/11/16 02:41 AM
56

Feminismandejoh/r/MensRights25/12/18 11:31 PM
56

Discriminationandejoh/r/MensRights20/01/16 07:48 PM
56

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights20/06/17 05:13 PM
56

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights16/06/19 08:46 PM
56

Discriminationandejoh/r/MensRights09/04/18 03:03 AM
55

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights28/03/18 10:49 AM
55

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights21/08/18 06:16 PM
55

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights27/04/18 03:48 AM
55

Edu./Occu.andejoh/r/MensRights11/06/18 08:38 PM
55

Edu./Occu.andejoh/r/MensRights16/04/18 12:54 AM
55

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights30/11/17 01:03 AM
55

andejoh/r/MensRights27/02/17 05:09 AM
54

False Accusationandejoh/r/MensRights09/12/18 07:49 AM
54

False Accusationandejoh/r/MensRights16/08/19 02:43 PM
53

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights04/04/19 02:17 AM
53

Discriminationandejoh/r/MensRights18/11/18 08:51 PM
53

Discriminationandejoh/r/MensRights22/11/18 04:21 AM
53

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights25/02/19 08:09 AM
53

Feminismandejoh/r/MensRights05/07/19 03:33 PM
53

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights29/08/18 05:37 PM
52

False Accusationandejoh/r/MensRights15/03/20 12:51 AM
52

Activism/Supportandejoh/r/MensRights27/11/19 03:46 AM
52

Feminismandejoh/r/MensRights23/02/16 12:48 PM
52

Legal Rightsandejoh/r/MensRights13/08/19 06:12 PM
52

Discriminationandejoh/r/MensRights02/06/18 04:32 AM
52

andejoh/r/MensRights13/11/16 02:29 AM
52

andejoh/r/MensRights28/01/18 02:40 AM
52

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights01/09/19 03:50 AM
51

andejoh/r/MensRights08/07/19 04:10 AM
51

Generalandejoh/r/MensRights26/03/22 10:31 PM
51

Legal Rightsandejoh/r/MensRights17/03/20 09:50 PM
51

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights14/07/17 06:43 AM
51

False Accusationandejoh/r/MensRights19/08/19 11:01 PM
51

Legal Rightsandejoh/r/MensRights12/07/19 09:56 PM
50

Progressandejoh/r/MensRights23/04/18 05:43 AM
50

False Accusationandejoh/r/MensRights28/11/16 04:15 AM
50

andejoh/r/MensRights17/02/17 05:39 PM
50

Legal Rightsandejoh/r/MensRights28/01/18 12:54 AM
50

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights23/03/18 09:50 PM
50

False Accusationandejoh/r/MensRights10/05/19 01:54 AM
50

Edu./Occu.andejoh/r/MensRights12/03/19 11:07 PM
49

Marriage/Childrenandejoh/r/MensRights13/12/18 02:20 AM
49

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights20/01/16 11:01 PM
49

Marriage/Childrenandejoh/r/MensRights27/02/20 08:20 PM
49

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights06/03/18 03:59 PM
48

Discriminationandejoh/r/MensRights14/04/18 05:11 PM
48

andejoh/r/MensRights14/02/17 07:03 AM
48

Discriminationandejoh/r/MensRights15/02/18 03:51 AM
48

Activism/Supportandejoh/r/MensRights01/02/19 06:07 PM
48

Marriage/Childrenandejoh/r/MensRights14/07/21 10:39 PM
48

Legal Rightsandejoh/r/MensRights31/07/21 06:08 PM
47

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights18/01/18 06:58 PM
47

andejoh/r/MensRights05/03/17 12:29 AM
47

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights11/06/21 12:22 PM
47

Progressandejoh/r/MensRights19/10/19 06:32 AM
47

Fathers/Custodyandejoh/r/MensRights13/12/15 01:36 AM
47

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights17/02/19 09:32 AM
47

andejoh/r/MensRights10/03/16 12:23 PM
47

Discriminationandejoh/r/MensRights06/04/20 01:10 AM
47

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights18/10/19 05:33 AM
47

Discriminationandejoh/r/MensRights18/10/19 05:23 AM
46

Legal Rightsandejoh/r/MensRights15/06/19 03:38 AM
46

Questionsandejoh/r/MensRights23/10/15 12:44 PM
46

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights30/10/19 03:22 AM
46

andejoh/r/MensRights09/02/16 12:26 AM
46

andejoh/r/MensRights24/09/16 08:34 PM
45

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights28/12/18 03:59 AM
45

False Accusationandejoh/r/MensRights04/03/18 05:26 PM
45

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights04/08/17 04:05 PM
45

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights21/01/21 06:22 AM
45

False Accusationandejoh/r/MensRights20/07/20 01:28 AM
45

Discriminationandejoh/r/MensRights26/03/18 03:47 AM
45

False Accusationandejoh/r/MensRights25/03/18 04:33 PM
45

Activism/Supportandejoh/r/MensRights25/10/18 12:28 AM
45

Discriminationandejoh/r/MensRights06/05/19 07:02 AM
44

False Accusationandejoh/r/MensRights12/07/18 05:40 PM
44

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights08/08/17 08:19 PM
44

Marriage/Childrenandejoh/r/MensRights02/09/19 08:17 PM
44

Generalandejoh/r/MensRights03/12/17 07:14 PM
44

Feminismandejoh/r/MensRights26/10/18 03:41 PM
44

andejoh/r/MensRights04/08/16 04:24 AM
43

Discriminationandejoh/r/MensRights27/04/19 02:30 AM
43

Marriage/Childrenandejoh/r/MensRights04/08/17 04:56 PM
43

Feminismandejoh/r/MensRights09/12/19 06:11 AM
43

Marriage/Childrenandejoh/r/MensRights30/05/19 07:19 PM
43

Discriminationandejoh/r/MensRights16/10/19 01:07 AM
42

Intactivismandejoh/r/MensRights24/10/19 12:49 AM
42

Activism/Supportandejoh/r/MensRights24/11/19 01:16 AM
42

Anti-MRMandejoh/r/MensRights07/10/19 02:22 PM
42

Discriminationandejoh/r/MensRights28/05/17 01:17 AM
42

andejoh/r/MensRights13/09/16 03:31 AM
42

andejoh/r/MensRights15/10/16 08:07 PM
42

andejoh/r/MensRights27/04/16 09:08 PM
41

andejoh/r/MensRights27/01/17 09:31 PM
41

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights03/04/16 06:55 PM
41

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights11/04/18 03:22 AM
41

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights06/04/20 09:01 PM
41

Discriminationandejoh/r/MensRights21/08/19 01:13 AM
41

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights04/12/18 01:07 AM
41

False Accusationandejoh/r/MensRights08/02/20 08:09 AM
40

Discriminationandejoh/r/MensRights30/03/18 08:18 PM
40

Feminismandejoh/r/MensRights05/12/17 11:40 PM
40

andejoh/r/MensRights07/01/17 09:47 PM
40

Edu./Occu.andejoh/r/MensRights18/07/18 10:17 PM
39

Edu./Occu.andejoh/r/MensRights16/07/19 05:34 PM
39

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights20/03/21 12:07 AM
39

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights11/04/17 06:38 AM
39

Feminismandejoh/r/MensRights04/12/19 09:41 PM
39

andejoh/r/MensRights07/04/16 03:32 AM
39

Activism/Supportandejoh/r/MensRights13/08/19 11:27 PM
39

Legal Rightsandejoh/r/MensRights27/04/17 04:06 AM
39

Discriminationandejoh/r/MensRights26/11/19 02:13 AM
39

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights18/06/21 03:17 AM
39

andejoh/r/MensRights22/03/16 08:12 PM
39

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights26/03/20 02:32 PM
39

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights04/04/18 09:02 PM
39

Edu./Occu.andejoh/r/MensRights09/09/18 08:37 PM
39

Discriminationandejoh/r/MensRights16/01/20 11:04 PM
39

False Accusationandejoh/r/MensRights19/01/18 06:58 AM
38

Progressandejoh/r/MensRights27/12/19 01:30 AM
38

Feminismandejoh/r/MensRights24/08/22 07:49 PM
38

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights15/05/18 12:03 AM
38

Feminismandejoh/r/MensRights01/09/17 12:48 AM
38

andejoh/r/MensRights21/12/15 04:34 PM
38

Legal Rightsandejoh/r/MensRights30/07/17 12:51 AM
38

False Accusationandejoh/r/MensRights06/03/20 08:20 PM
38

Edu./Occu.andejoh/r/MensRights16/06/18 09:19 AM
37

False Accusationandejoh/r/MensRights24/04/23 08:19 PM
37

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights15/07/17 01:41 PM
37

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights02/01/19 12:45 AM
37

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights01/04/18 04:24 PM
37

Discriminationandejoh/r/MensRights11/05/18 01:58 AM
37

Generalandejoh/r/MensRights30/06/21 06:24 PM
37

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights17/02/18 05:26 AM
37

Discriminationandejoh/r/MensRights04/03/19 04:29 AM
37

Edu./Occu.andejoh/r/MensRights04/10/18 12:40 AM
36

False Accusationandejoh/r/MensRights12/04/18 09:20 PM
36

False Accusationandejoh/r/MensRights23/08/19 02:45 AM
36

False Accusationandejoh/r/MensRights17/10/15 03:23 PM
36

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights09/05/19 07:19 AM
36

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights13/04/17 06:43 AM
36

Feminismandejoh/r/MensRights05/10/17 11:16 PM
36

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights08/06/17 08:50 AM
36

andejoh/r/MensRights29/08/16 07:15 AM
36

andejoh/r/MensRights27/06/16 11:30 PM
36

Legal Rightsandejoh/r/MensRights20/08/17 01:33 AM
36

Discriminationandejoh/r/MensRights20/04/17 06:35 AM
36

Discriminationandejoh/r/MensRights07/12/20 04:22 PM
36

Feminismandejoh/r/MensRights18/03/18 01:02 AM
36

Edu./Occu.andejoh/r/MensRights12/02/19 06:37 PM
35

andejoh/r/MensRights13/06/16 03:31 AM
35

Marriage/Childrenandejoh/r/MensRights26/05/19 05:40 PM
35

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights03/04/20 01:58 PM
35

andejoh/r/MensRights10/07/16 07:22 PM
35

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights14/07/17 07:00 AM
35

andejoh/r/MensRights30/09/16 04:29 PM
35

Marriage/Childrenandejoh/r/MensRights16/04/18 02:24 PM
35

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights13/08/18 09:15 PM
34

andejoh/r/MensRights21/08/18 05:38 PM
34

andejoh/r/MensRights15/01/16 04:12 PM
34

Discriminationandejoh/r/MensRights13/07/22 06:37 PM
34

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights13/03/18 09:08 PM
34

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights17/10/18 11:50 PM
34

andejoh/r/MensRights24/01/16 07:27 AM
34

Legal Rightsandejoh/r/MensRights20/06/18 11:59 PM
34

Feminismandejoh/r/MensRights16/07/19 05:55 PM
34

andejoh/r/MensRights26/12/16 06:12 AM
34

Edu./Occu.andejoh/r/MensRights23/03/18 02:21 AM
33

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights17/03/18 12:56 AM
33

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights31/08/19 06:25 PM
33

andejoh/r/MensRights03/10/16 06:22 PM
33

False Accusationandejoh/r/MensRights28/11/15 10:23 PM
33

Progressandejoh/r/MensRights02/07/17 12:15 AM
33

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights25/07/18 03:32 AM
33

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights13/08/19 01:46 AM
33

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights16/02/18 01:59 AM
33

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights16/12/18 03:19 AM
33

Generalandejoh/r/MensRights01/11/15 11:35 PM
33

Edu./Occu.andejoh/r/MensRights03/04/18 01:49 AM
33

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights13/03/18 09:16 PM
33

Edu./Occu.andejoh/r/MensRights13/07/17 06:12 AM
33

False Accusationandejoh/r/MensRights11/04/19 11:59 PM
32

Feminismandejoh/r/MensRights03/08/18 03:28 PM
32

andejoh/r/MensRights27/06/16 09:40 PM
32

Discriminationandejoh/r/MensRights28/12/17 07:59 AM
32

False Accusationandejoh/r/MensRights17/12/17 11:08 PM
32

Legal Rightsandejoh/r/MensRights22/09/18 04:12 AM
32

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights23/08/18 01:56 AM
32

andejoh/r/MensRights25/06/18 12:26 AM
31

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights01/06/18 06:43 PM
31

Feminismandejoh/r/MensRights12/08/18 03:47 PM
31

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights20/07/18 07:08 PM
31

andejoh/r/MensRights31/12/15 08:40 AM
31

andejoh/r/MensRights02/09/16 02:31 AM
31

Legal Rightsandejoh/r/MensRights04/03/19 04:22 AM
31

Questionsandejoh/r/MensRights13/11/15 03:15 PM
31

andejoh/r/MensRights28/04/19 12:14 AM
31

andejoh/r/MensRights28/04/19 10:12 PM
31

Intactivismandejoh/r/MensRights05/07/18 09:41 AM
31

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights04/04/18 04:18 AM
31

Discriminationandejoh/r/MensRights09/08/17 08:18 PM
31

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights06/08/17 12:49 AM
31

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights28/02/18 07:48 PM
30

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights04/02/20 01:34 AM
30

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights18/12/18 04:01 AM
30

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights28/08/19 05:12 AM
30

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights11/04/18 01:48 AM
30

Healthandejoh/r/MensRights16/10/19 03:56 AM
30

False Accusationandejoh/r/MensRights11/06/17 06:03 AM
30

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights11/09/18 12:18 AM
30

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights24/11/18 02:56 PM
30

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights03/12/17 06:43 AM
30

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights30/10/17 05:56 PM
29

Edu./Occu.andejoh/r/MensRights17/10/15 03:36 PM
29

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights04/10/17 11:50 PM
29

andejoh/r/MensRights25/10/16 05:29 AM
29

Discriminationandejoh/r/MensRights02/05/18 01:14 AM
29

Edu./Occu.andejoh/r/MensRights15/07/17 06:21 AM
29

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights17/08/15 11:20 PM
29

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights17/08/15 08:48 PM
29

andejoh/r/MensRights02/07/16 10:08 PM
29

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights17/04/19 06:18 PM
29

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights25/05/19 11:59 AM
29

Legal Rightsandejoh/r/MensRights29/06/15 02:30 AM
29

Legal Rightsandejoh/r/MensRights07/09/18 05:52 PM
29

Intactivismandejoh/r/MensRights03/12/18 12:34 AM
29

Legal Rightsandejoh/r/MensRights05/09/19 12:14 AM
29

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights06/02/18 10:41 AM
29

Intactivismandejoh/r/MensRights09/08/18 07:06 PM
29

Legal Rightsandejoh/r/MensRights03/09/18 05:13 AM
29

andejoh/r/MensRights07/03/16 11:06 AM
29

Feminismandejoh/r/MensRights24/08/19 03:38 PM
29

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights05/03/19 07:56 PM
29

Marriage/Childrenandejoh/r/MensRights15/07/17 07:15 PM
29

andejoh/r/MensRights19/01/16 08:06 AM
28

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights04/02/16 05:54 PM
28

False Accusationandejoh/r/MensRights19/12/18 12:31 AM
28

False Accusationandejoh/r/MensRights16/03/18 03:42 AM
28

Progressandejoh/r/MensRights11/02/19 12:21 AM
28

andejoh/r/MensRights17/09/16 02:58 PM
28

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights07/10/17 02:53 AM
28

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights06/10/17 07:53 PM
28

Edu./Occu.andejoh/r/MensRights09/08/18 05:51 AM
27

andejoh/r/MensRights14/10/16 07:38 PM
27

Legal Rightsandejoh/r/MensRights05/03/19 07:10 AM
27

Legal Rightsandejoh/r/MensRights21/05/20 07:22 AM
27

Someandejoh/r/MensRights06/09/18 12:48 AM
27

Feminismandejoh/r/MensRights09/05/22 04:53 AM
27

Healthandejoh/r/MensRights23/05/20 06:25 PM
27

Legal Rightsandejoh/r/MensRights11/04/18 03:37 AM
27

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights29/10/17 11:09 PM
27

Activism/Supportandejoh/r/MensRights17/05/17 05:49 PM
27

andejoh/r/MensRights19/06/16 09:23 PM
27

Legal Rightsandejoh/r/MensRights22/12/18 03:47 AM
27

False Accusationandejoh/r/MensRights22/10/19 06:48 PM
27

Discriminationandejoh/r/MensRights06/06/17 11:47 PM
27

Discriminationandejoh/r/MensRights16/04/17 12:31 AM
27

Discriminationandejoh/r/MensRights12/02/20 03:23 AM
26

Marriage/Childrenandejoh/r/MensRights16/05/19 03:48 AM
26

andejoh/r/MensRights24/12/16 03:55 AM
26

andejoh/r/MensRights05/03/17 02:14 AM
26

Edu./Occu.andejoh/r/MensRights07/09/19 12:24 AM
26

andejoh/r/MensRights16/06/16 07:46 PM
26

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights17/12/19 12:39 PM
26

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights25/04/18 04:35 PM
26

Discriminationandejoh/r/MensRights25/04/18 04:14 PM
26

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights06/11/20 02:01 AM
25

Edu./Occu.andejoh/r/MensRights09/02/19 02:43 AM
25

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights25/11/18 04:45 PM
25

andejoh/r/MensRights10/01/16 09:07 PM
25

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights11/02/18 07:57 PM
25

Discriminationandejoh/r/MensRights06/09/15 05:07 AM
25

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights14/03/18 08:16 PM
25

Generalandejoh/r/MensRights31/08/21 06:16 PM
25

andejoh/r/MensRights24/08/16 08:04 AM
25

andejoh/r/MensRights09/03/16 10:58 PM
25

Feminismandejoh/r/MensRights04/02/20 01:19 AM
25

andejoh/r/MensRights18/06/16 03:42 AM
24

False Accusationandejoh/r/MensRights07/10/18 01:23 AM
24

Discriminationandejoh/r/MensRights22/08/19 03:46 AM
24

Discriminationandejoh/r/MensRights09/02/20 08:45 PM
24

Legal Rightsandejoh/r/MensRights09/03/19 09:44 PM
24

Questionsandejoh/r/MensRights24/08/15 08:57 PM
24

False Accusationandejoh/r/MensRights19/04/20 05:36 AM
24

andejoh/r/MensRights09/11/16 03:30 PM
24

andejoh/r/MensRights18/04/16 06:42 PM
24

Legal Rightsandejoh/r/MensRights02/07/15 12:58 AM
24

andejoh/r/MensRights21/09/16 02:17 AM
24

Generalandejoh/r/MensRights04/12/15 01:09 AM
24

Legal Rightsandejoh/r/MensRights23/05/18 12:01 AM
24

andejoh/r/MensRights27/07/16 09:24 AM
24

Edu./Occu.andejoh/r/MensRights26/05/18 09:01 PM
24

Edu./Occu.andejoh/r/MensRights05/11/15 12:22 AM
23

andejoh/r/MensRights12/03/16 06:26 PM
23

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights18/02/20 06:41 PM
23

andejoh/r/MensRights05/01/16 04:37 AM
23

Edu./Occu.andejoh/r/MensRights01/04/18 04:15 PM
23

Generalandejoh/r/MensRights21/06/21 03:35 PM
23

Feminismandejoh/r/MensRights11/07/19 12:01 AM
23

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights28/03/20 06:48 PM
23

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights28/02/18 11:13 PM
23

andejoh/r/MensRights02/03/16 08:40 PM
22

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights26/04/20 08:11 PM
22

Edu./Occu.andejoh/r/MensRights04/09/15 12:06 AM
22

False Accusationandejoh/r/MensRights23/06/19 06:38 AM
22

False Accusationandejoh/r/MensRights30/04/17 10:43 PM
22

andejoh/r/MensRights15/01/16 04:23 PM
22

Edu./Occu.andejoh/r/MensRights01/02/16 02:16 PM
22

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights13/12/18 10:08 PM
22

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights17/12/19 02:18 PM
22

Generalandejoh/r/MensRights08/12/19 08:23 PM
22

andejoh/r/MensRights06/07/16 08:31 PM
22

Activism/Supportandejoh/r/MensRights28/10/17 06:28 PM
22

andejoh/r/MensRights21/01/16 05:03 AM
22

Discriminationandejoh/r/MensRights11/02/19 12:32 AM
22

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights07/11/18 10:22 PM
22

False Accusationandejoh/r/MensRights02/11/20 06:00 PM
22

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights05/02/16 05:02 PM
22

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights18/10/19 06:07 AM
22

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights24/04/19 09:34 PM
22

andejoh/r/MensRights01/04/16 12:47 AM
22

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights05/01/20 03:03 PM
22

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights13/08/17 07:09 PM
22

Discriminationandejoh/r/MensRights26/04/20 05:03 AM
22

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights18/03/18 12:38 AM
22

Marriage/Childrenandejoh/r/MensRights25/09/18 02:51 AM
21

Legal Rightsandejoh/r/MensRights17/10/15 05:56 PM
21

andejoh/r/MensRights28/03/16 07:41 PM
21

andejoh/r/MensRights21/01/17 06:33 AM
21

False Accusationandejoh/r/MensRights12/01/20 10:52 PM
21

andejoh/r/MensRights11/01/16 11:08 PM
21

False Accusationandejoh/r/MensRights15/01/23 05:18 PM
21

False Accusationandejoh/r/MensRights12/04/18 09:04 PM
21

andejoh/r/MensRights24/01/17 12:23 AM
21

Marriage/Childrenandejoh/r/MensRights20/08/17 09:21 AM
21

andejoh/r/MensRights27/12/15 12:21 AM
21

andejoh/r/MensRights01/07/16 03:04 PM
21

andejoh/r/MensRights25/03/16 06:14 PM
21

Progressandejoh/r/MensRights23/12/18 07:18 PM
21

andejoh/r/MensRights04/08/16 04:28 AM
21

andejoh/r/MensRights24/06/18 11:34 AM
21

andejoh/r/MensRights08/11/16 05:03 AM
20

Discriminationandejoh/r/MensRights27/12/19 02:21 AM
20

andejoh/r/MensRights29/12/15 01:28 AM
20

Fathers/Custodyandejoh/r/MensRights11/09/15 10:11 PM
20

andejoh/r/MensRights24/09/16 01:07 AM
20

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights28/12/18 03:11 AM
20

Discriminationandejoh/r/MensRights18/07/15 05:57 AM
20

Legal Rightsandejoh/r/MensRights11/05/22 06:20 AM
20

Discriminationandejoh/r/MensRights01/09/17 04:07 AM
20

andejoh/r/MensRights13/06/16 05:07 AM
20

Feminismandejoh/r/MensRights18/03/20 07:22 PM
20

False Accusationandejoh/r/MensRights10/12/15 12:20 AM
20

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights06/02/16 11:26 AM
20

Feminismandejoh/r/MensRights31/08/18 06:00 AM
20

False Accusationandejoh/r/MensRights25/06/20 01:54 AM
20

False Accusationandejoh/r/MensRights23/07/18 04:17 PM
20

Edu./Occu.andejoh/r/MensRights10/07/19 10:41 PM
20

Legal Rightsandejoh/r/MensRights16/12/17 06:35 PM
20

Activism/Supportandejoh/r/MensRights22/11/15 07:30 AM
20

andejoh/r/MensRights03/05/19 09:15 PM
20

andejoh/r/MensRights13/03/17 09:11 AM
19

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights05/06/20 11:09 PM
19

andejoh/r/MensRights22/10/16 01:02 AM
19

Discriminationandejoh/r/MensRights23/08/19 02:56 AM
19

andejoh/r/MensRights28/12/15 09:41 PM
19

andejoh/r/MensRights18/10/16 02:49 AM
19

Discriminationandejoh/r/MensRights27/11/19 03:40 AM
19

andejoh/r/MensRights01/01/16 02:55 AM
19

Edu./Occu.andejoh/r/MensRights10/09/17 09:32 PM
19

Legal Rightsandejoh/r/MensRights30/09/15 06:44 PM
19

Fathers/Custodyandejoh/r/MensRights31/01/16 11:25 AM
19

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights19/08/18 11:53 PM
19

andejoh/r/MensRights28/07/16 07:26 AM
19

andejoh/r/MensRights02/05/16 02:08 AM
19

Feminismandejoh/r/MensRights25/08/18 05:53 AM
19

Discriminationandejoh/r/MensRights13/08/17 09:14 AM
18

andejoh/r/MensRights07/06/16 02:22 PM
18

Edu./Occu.andejoh/r/MensRights01/12/18 02:56 AM
18

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights30/11/18 11:36 PM
18

Intactivismandejoh/r/MensRights16/10/19 10:05 PM
18

andejoh/r/MensRights07/09/16 04:29 AM
18

andejoh/r/MensRights13/04/16 08:55 PM
18

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights22/09/17 12:34 PM
18

Discriminationandejoh/r/MensRights17/08/19 04:37 PM
18

Generalandejoh/r/MensRights04/09/22 08:34 PM
18

andejoh/r/MensRights24/07/16 10:59 PM
18

andejoh/r/MensRights12/03/17 07:36 AM
18

False Accusationandejoh/r/MensRights27/06/19 11:29 PM
18

andejoh/r/MensRights26/01/17 09:55 AM
18

andejoh/r/MensRights17/01/16 07:30 AM
18

Marriage/Childrenandejoh/r/MensRights09/04/18 09:42 PM
18

andejoh/r/MensRights14/07/16 07:00 AM
18

Progressandejoh/r/MensRights17/12/17 09:55 AM
18

Marriage/Childrenandejoh/r/MensRights31/10/17 07:34 PM
18

andejoh/r/MensRights14/04/19 11:00 PM
18

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights11/08/15 10:18 PM
18

Edu./Occu.andejoh/r/MensRights30/04/20 05:06 PM
18

andejoh/r/MensRights13/03/16 02:25 PM
18

Intactivismandejoh/r/MensRights14/07/18 12:33 AM
18

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights22/08/15 02:08 PM
17

Generalandejoh/r/MensRights07/03/22 10:12 PM
17

Feminismandejoh/r/MensRights24/09/15 12:03 AM
17

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights12/11/21 08:35 PM
17

Generalandejoh/r/MensRights04/02/18 07:34 AM
17

Humourandejoh/r/MensRights14/10/17 07:23 PM
17

Edu./Occu.andejoh/r/MensRights21/03/18 04:38 AM
17

andejoh/r/MensRights26/08/16 12:40 AM
17

andejoh/r/MensRights11/07/16 01:12 AM
17

Edu./Occu.andejoh/r/MensRights19/04/20 12:14 AM
17

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights17/01/16 03:40 AM
17

Legal Rightsandejoh/r/MensRights20/04/19 06:10 PM
17

andejoh/r/MensRights14/07/16 06:05 AM
17

False Accusationandejoh/r/MensRights26/01/16 07:10 PM
17

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights29/06/17 10:48 AM
16

andejoh/r/MensRights07/09/16 07:06 AM
16

andejoh/r/MensRights03/04/16 08:11 PM
16

andejoh/r/MensRights07/01/16 11:01 PM
16

Legal Rightsandejoh/r/MensRights16/03/18 12:40 AM
16

andejoh/r/MensRights26/01/17 09:06 PM
16

andejoh/r/MensRights27/09/16 07:04 AM
16

andejoh/r/MensRights16/02/16 11:22 AM
16

Generalandejoh/r/MensRights25/06/20 07:41 PM
16

Edu./Occu.andejoh/r/MensRights06/04/16 12:16 AM
16

False Accusationandejoh/r/MensRights05/11/15 09:55 PM
16

Generalandejoh/r/MensRights31/05/17 08:58 AM
16

Discriminationandejoh/r/MensRights06/04/20 01:46 AM
16

andejoh/r/MensRights16/01/16 03:09 PM
16

Feminismandejoh/r/MensRights16/05/17 05:46 AM
15

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights29/07/20 04:30 AM
15

andejoh/r/MensRights14/04/16 02:12 AM
15

andejoh/r/MensRights30/07/16 02:00 AM
15

Marriage/Childrenandejoh/r/MensRights08/07/19 02:01 PM
15

andejoh/r/MensRights24/01/17 01:05 AM
15

andejoh/r/MensRights04/02/17 05:41 PM
15

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights16/08/18 05:17 AM
15

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights05/12/15 03:22 PM
15

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights09/05/18 04:54 PM
15

Edu./Occu.andejoh/r/MensRights02/10/17 11:13 PM
15

andejoh/r/MensRights26/12/15 06:11 PM
15

andejoh/r/MensRights14/07/16 07:49 PM
15

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights18/05/19 01:00 AM
15

Activism/Supportandejoh/r/MensRights06/09/15 05:25 AM
15

Generalandejoh/r/MensRights02/07/15 07:41 PM
15

andejoh/r/MensRights18/01/17 05:01 PM
15

andejoh/r/MensRights14/03/16 06:44 PM
15

False Accusationandejoh/r/MensRights07/09/18 03:57 PM
15

andejoh/r/MensRights11/02/16 10:59 PM
15

Discriminationandejoh/r/MensRights13/04/18 10:53 PM
15

andejoh/r/MensRights20/09/16 09:30 PM
15

andejoh/r/MensRights09/01/16 12:26 AM
15

andejoh/r/MensRights18/06/16 03:03 AM
14

andejoh/r/MensRights24/09/16 06:26 AM
14

andejoh/r/MensRights24/06/16 04:46 PM
14

Discriminationandejoh/r/MensRights31/07/17 11:35 AM
14

Intactivismandejoh/r/MensRights11/02/18 08:24 PM
14

Eastern Cultureandejoh/r/MensRights13/12/15 01:59 AM
14

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights03/09/17 10:36 PM
14

Generalandejoh/r/MensRights04/08/19 03:32 AM
14

Edu./Occu.andejoh/r/MensRights01/08/17 10:19 AM
14

andejoh/r/MensRights19/10/16 06:55 PM
14

Legal Rightsandejoh/r/MensRights06/05/19 10:17 PM
14

Feminismandejoh/r/MensRights10/12/19 06:22 PM
13

False Accusationandejoh/r/MensRights23/02/18 08:17 AM
13

Activism/Supportandejoh/r/MensRights30/03/18 11:50 PM
13

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights10/11/18 04:10 AM
13

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights14/03/20 10:33 PM
13

Legal Rightsandejoh/r/MensRights11/05/22 08:05 AM
13

Feminismandejoh/r/MensRights09/12/19 03:48 AM
13

andejoh/r/MensRights25/01/16 08:03 AM
13

False Accusationandejoh/r/MensRights09/03/19 10:40 PM
13

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights17/11/15 10:36 PM
13

andejoh/r/MensRights08/09/18 06:09 PM
13

Legal Rightsandejoh/r/MensRights17/02/20 06:53 PM
13

andejoh/r/MensRights14/01/16 04:39 AM
13

Fathers/Custodyandejoh/r/MensRights19/11/15 09:31 PM
13

Progressandejoh/r/MensRights07/05/20 04:20 AM
13

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights16/03/19 12:48 AM
13

Edu./Occu.andejoh/r/MensRights01/10/17 12:40 AM
13

Generalandejoh/r/MensRights09/04/20 02:49 PM
13

andejoh/r/MensRights04/08/16 04:35 AM
13

andejoh/r/MensRights23/08/16 04:32 PM
12

andejoh/r/MensRights12/02/17 01:24 AM
12

False Accusationandejoh/r/MensRights23/12/18 01:59 AM
12

Edu./Occu.andejoh/r/MensRights14/04/19 10:50 PM
12

andejoh/r/MensRights10/06/16 01:19 AM
12

Legal Rightsandejoh/r/MensRights23/10/19 06:47 PM
12

andejoh/r/MensRights09/05/19 03:30 AM
12

Discriminationandejoh/r/MensRights29/05/17 09:20 AM
12

Generalandejoh/r/MensRights23/11/15 06:50 PM
12

andejoh/r/MensRights10/04/19 08:52 PM
12

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights20/08/18 05:59 AM
12

andejoh/r/MensRights26/10/16 05:37 PM
12

Generalandejoh/r/MensRights14/09/15 03:01 AM
12

andejoh/r/MensRights22/03/16 04:24 PM
12

andejoh/r/MensRights27/04/19 10:58 PM
12

andejoh/r/MensRights18/07/16 04:22 PM
12

andejoh/r/MensRights12/09/16 09:00 PM
12

andejoh/r/MensRights01/06/18 12:40 PM
12

Discriminationandejoh/r/MensRights09/04/20 09:00 PM
12

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights01/11/19 11:18 PM
12

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights25/10/19 03:51 AM
12

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights20/12/15 03:07 AM
12

andejoh/r/MensRights22/01/16 09:37 AM
12

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights03/12/15 05:51 AM
11

Activism/Supportandejoh/r/MensRights24/09/17 01:36 AM
11

andejoh/r/MensRights01/11/16 04:12 AM
11

Legal Rightsandejoh/r/MensRights05/10/15 08:33 PM
11

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights26/04/18 09:18 PM
11

Legal Rightsandejoh/r/MensRights02/10/17 11:29 PM
11

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights04/01/19 05:20 PM
11

andejoh/r/MensRights08/03/16 08:57 AM
11

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights03/12/17 07:25 PM
11

andejoh/r/MensRights05/07/16 06:10 PM
11

Legal Rightsandejoh/r/MensRights20/01/18 04:13 AM
11

Healthandejoh/r/MensRights01/09/19 11:57 PM
11

Discriminationandejoh/r/MensRights24/01/20 07:03 PM
11

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights27/08/18 02:50 PM
11

Legal Rightsandejoh/r/MensRights07/05/22 10:51 PM
11

Marriage/Childrenandejoh/r/MensRights18/07/19 03:33 PM
11

False Accusationandejoh/r/MensRights13/06/20 03:06 AM
11

False Accusationandejoh/r/MensRights18/06/19 09:24 PM
11

andejoh/r/MensRights09/01/17 02:17 AM
10

andejoh/r/MensRights25/01/16 11:12 PM
10

Discriminationandejoh/r/MensRights11/11/15 11:04 PM
10

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights28/06/17 11:00 PM
10

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights18/12/15 06:19 PM
10

Legal Rightsandejoh/r/MensRights05/09/18 05:47 PM
10

andejoh/r/MensRights20/10/16 10:53 PM
10

Humourandejoh/r/MensRights07/08/17 08:00 AM
10

andejoh/r/MensRights26/08/16 12:47 AM
10

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights15/01/20 01:17 AM
10

andejoh/r/MensRights11/01/16 12:02 AM
10

andejoh/r/MensRights25/04/16 11:50 PM
10

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights05/04/18 06:30 PM
10

Feminismandejoh/r/MensRights21/03/20 07:04 PM
10

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights22/11/15 10:18 PM
10

False Accusationandejoh/r/MensRights24/04/19 10:00 PM
10

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights25/11/15 11:38 PM
10

False Accusationandejoh/r/MensRights12/12/17 09:05 AM
10

Generalandejoh/r/MensRights13/09/15 05:08 AM
10

andejoh/r/MensRights24/08/16 05:01 AM
10

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights16/12/17 01:22 AM
10

andejoh/r/MensRights09/03/16 05:48 PM
9

Progressandejoh/r/MensRights19/12/18 12:45 AM
9

Discriminationandejoh/r/MensRights24/08/18 07:14 PM
9

Marriage/Divorceandejoh/r/MensRights18/12/15 06:47 PM
9

andejoh/r/MensRights30/07/16 09:02 AM
9

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights13/08/15 07:47 PM
9

Questionsandejoh/r/MensRights25/08/15 01:35 PM
9

andejoh/r/MensRights07/09/16 12:49 AM
9

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights11/12/18 04:14 PM
9

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights08/12/17 07:58 PM
9

Feminismandejoh/r/MensRights02/09/15 10:39 AM
9

andejoh/r/MensRights28/07/16 10:47 PM
9

andejoh/r/MensRights14/07/16 08:19 PM
9

andejoh/r/MensRights13/05/16 07:01 PM
9

andejoh/r/MensRights05/06/16 05:13 AM
9

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights28/07/22 07:15 PM
9

andejoh/r/MensRights03/01/16 07:56 PM
9

andejoh/r/MensRights30/06/16 10:15 PM
9

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights09/04/16 03:35 AM
9

Feminismandejoh/r/MensRights29/08/17 12:40 PM
9

Marriage/Childrenandejoh/r/MensRights26/07/18 05:42 PM
9

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights07/06/17 01:25 AM
9

Legal Rightsandejoh/r/MensRights04/09/15 05:53 PM
9

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights29/08/18 05:11 PM
8

andejoh/r/MensRights22/10/16 12:12 AM
8

andejoh/r/MensRights12/01/16 08:43 AM
8

Progressandejoh/r/MensRights26/11/19 10:33 PM
8

andejoh/r/MensRights17/02/16 08:02 PM
8

andejoh/r/MensRights15/01/16 04:01 PM
8

Legal Rightsandejoh/r/MensRights08/10/15 08:40 PM
8

Eastern Cultureandejoh/r/MensRights29/08/15 11:56 PM
8

andejoh/r/MensRights05/01/16 04:55 AM
8

Activism/Supportandejoh/r/MensRights08/08/17 01:53 PM
8

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights13/10/18 06:51 PM
8

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights27/10/15 11:23 AM
8

Legal Rightsandejoh/r/MensRights26/01/20 09:58 PM
8

Legal Rightsandejoh/r/MensRights04/08/17 04:06 AM
8

andejoh/r/MensRights17/08/16 10:23 PM
8

Generalandejoh/r/MensRights17/11/15 10:41 AM
8

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights20/04/19 08:02 PM
8

Fathers/Custodyandejoh/r/MensRights10/09/15 01:23 AM
8

Edu./Occu.andejoh/r/MensRights09/10/18 12:22 AM
8

Generalandejoh/r/MensRights23/11/19 11:23 PM
7

andejoh/r/MensRights08/07/16 02:34 AM
7

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights30/12/17 01:07 PM
7

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights08/03/19 03:24 AM
7

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights05/09/18 09:23 PM
7

andejoh/r/MensRights07/09/16 05:17 AM
7

andejoh/r/MensRights16/06/16 06:19 PM
7

Edu./Occu.andejoh/r/MensRights30/04/17 06:14 AM
7

andejoh/r/MensRights15/08/16 03:49 AM
7

andejoh/r/MensRights24/07/16 11:17 PM
7

andejoh/r/MensRights09/02/16 09:33 PM
7

Generalandejoh/r/MensRights06/10/21 08:28 AM
7

False Accusationandejoh/r/MensRights25/05/17 12:06 AM
7

andejoh/r/MensRights26/12/15 06:25 PM
7

andejoh/r/MensRights26/12/15 05:49 PM
7

andejoh/r/MensRights14/01/16 04:17 AM
7

Activism/Supportandejoh/r/MensRights05/04/19 11:52 PM
7

andejoh/r/MensRights05/05/16 08:23 PM
7

andejoh/r/MensRights11/06/16 04:57 PM
7

andejoh/r/MensRights25/03/16 11:13 PM
7

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights09/09/18 02:43 PM
7

andejoh/r/MensRights30/06/16 06:09 AM
7

andejoh/r/MensRights09/03/16 11:30 PM
7

andejoh/r/MensRights25/06/16 09:34 PM
6

Generalandejoh/r/MensRights18/07/21 06:23 PM
6

Generalandejoh/r/MensRights25/02/21 01:18 AM
6

andejoh/r/MensRights19/05/16 03:51 AM
6

Marriage/Childrenandejoh/r/MensRights15/07/17 09:35 AM
6

andejoh/r/MensRights01/02/17 05:25 AM
6

andejoh/r/MensRights03/07/16 03:25 AM
6

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights13/12/19 04:57 AM
6

andejoh/r/MensRights15/01/16 01:57 AM
6

Generalandejoh/r/MensRights11/09/15 01:33 AM
6

Generalandejoh/r/MensRights25/06/15 09:51 PM
6

Generalandejoh/r/MensRights23/11/15 07:11 PM
6

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights17/01/18 08:46 PM
6

Marriage/Divorceandejoh/r/MensRights08/08/15 06:34 PM
6

Edu./Occu.andejoh/r/MensRights23/02/18 10:10 PM
6

Edu./Occu.andejoh/r/MensRights01/08/17 05:17 PM
6

andejoh/r/MensRights28/08/16 02:55 AM
6

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights19/05/18 02:29 AM
6

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights10/06/18 10:32 PM
6

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights18/03/18 12:53 AM
6

Edu./Occu.andejoh/r/MensRights13/08/17 08:56 AM
5

andejoh/r/MensRights12/01/17 11:55 PM
5

Discriminationandejoh/r/MensRights22/05/17 05:40 PM
5

andejoh/r/MensRights27/02/16 01:31 PM
5

andejoh/r/MensRights15/09/16 02:40 AM
5

Generalandejoh/r/MensRights26/06/15 04:02 PM
5

Edu./Occu.andejoh/r/MensRights08/10/15 09:51 PM
5

andejoh/r/MensRights22/08/16 07:45 PM
5

False Accusationandejoh/r/MensRights08/12/18 06:03 PM
5

andejoh/r/MensRights22/12/16 08:44 PM
5

Edu./Occu.andejoh/r/MensRights30/09/15 06:16 PM
5

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights20/06/17 11:04 PM
5

andejoh/r/MensRights04/03/16 07:03 PM
5

Marriage/Childrenandejoh/r/MensRights17/06/19 04:25 AM
5

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights05/11/20 06:24 AM
5

Legal Rightsandejoh/r/MensRights22/10/19 06:18 PM
5

Generalandejoh/r/MensRights14/09/15 02:51 AM
5

andejoh/r/MensRights21/03/16 11:22 PM
5

andejoh/r/MensRights31/12/16 12:57 AM
5

Discriminationandejoh/r/MensRights12/04/19 04:28 AM
5

andejoh/r/MensRights02/03/16 08:22 PM
5

Marriage/Childrenandejoh/r/MensRights16/05/18 09:29 PM
5

Discriminationandejoh/r/MensRights19/11/15 12:30 AM
4

andejoh/r/MensRights16/07/16 10:58 PM
4

andejoh/r/MensRights11/08/16 09:52 PM
4

Marriage/Childrenandejoh/r/MensRights02/11/17 07:22 PM
4

Feminismandejoh/r/MensRights21/09/17 11:54 PM
4

Edu./Occu.andejoh/r/MensRights18/10/17 12:04 AM
4

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights22/09/17 12:34 AM
4

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights29/07/19 05:49 PM
4

andejoh/r/MensRights11/07/16 02:25 AM
4

Discriminationandejoh/r/MensRights13/07/19 04:46 AM
4

Might be working againandejoh/r/MensRights11/02/16 10:35 PM
4

Edu./Occu.andejoh/r/MensRights20/04/17 06:57 AM
4

andejoh/r/MensRights01/05/19 01:33 AM
4

andejoh/r/MensRights19/06/18 06:05 PM
4

andejoh/r/MensRights09/03/16 06:23 PM
4

andejoh/r/MensRights09/03/16 05:58 PM
3

andejoh/r/MensRights11/05/16 08:54 PM
3

andejoh/r/MensRights06/06/16 06:17 PM
3

andejoh/r/MensRights08/02/17 03:06 AM
3

Questionsandejoh/r/MensRights22/06/15 03:11 PM
3

Generalandejoh/r/MensRights03/10/17 12:48 AM
3

andejoh/r/MensRights14/02/19 09:36 AM
3

andejoh/r/MensRights09/10/16 09:55 PM
3

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights03/02/16 02:59 AM
3

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights09/11/17 03:59 AM
3

andejoh/r/MensRights15/10/15 12:03 AM
3

andejoh/r/MensRights08/06/16 05:15 AM
3

Marriage/Childrenandejoh/r/MensRights26/07/18 06:54 PM
3

Anti-MRMandejoh/r/MensRights21/06/15 12:41 AM
3

Discriminationandejoh/r/MensRights15/11/17 06:56 PM
3

andejoh/r/MensRights24/03/16 11:24 PM
3

andejoh/r/MensRights08/08/16 03:09 AM
3

andejoh/r/MensRights16/11/16 01:31 AM
3

Activism/Supportandejoh/r/MensRights01/08/17 09:42 AM
2

andejoh/r/MensRights04/04/16 01:12 PM
2

Legal Rightsandejoh/r/MensRights28/07/17 12:31 AM
2

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights15/03/18 04:46 PM
2

andejoh/r/MensRights07/07/16 03:58 AM
2

andejoh/r/MensRights15/07/16 03:25 PM
2

False Accusationandejoh/r/MensRights14/05/17 08:56 AM
2

andejoh/r/MensRights18/09/15 12:37 PM
2

andejoh/r/MensRights11/07/16 12:32 AM
2

Marriage/Childrenandejoh/r/MensRights12/09/18 02:57 PM
2

andejoh/r/MensRights20/10/16 12:41 AM
2

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights14/10/15 11:41 PM
2

andejoh/r/MensRights16/12/18 03:53 AM
2

andejoh/r/MensRights23/07/16 02:49 AM
2

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights29/03/18 09:23 PM
2

Discriminationandejoh/r/MensRights03/04/18 08:04 PM
2

andejoh/r/MensRights05/07/16 01:15 AM
2

andejoh/r/MensRights13/07/16 05:26 AM
1

Activism/Supportandejoh/r/MensRights07/10/18 09:04 PM
1

andejoh/r/MensRights26/08/16 11:09 PM
1

andejoh/r/MensRights21/08/18 06:54 PM
1

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights07/09/15 07:05 PM
1

Marriage/Childrenandejoh/r/MensRights19/02/19 02:28 PM
1

Humourandejoh/r/MensRights02/08/21 06:05 PM
1

Feminismandejoh/r/MensRights20/07/15 10:50 PM
1

andejoh/r/MensRights08/09/18 12:43 AM
1

andejoh/r/MensRights23/06/16 01:54 AM
1

andejoh/r/MensRights31/08/16 06:47 PM
1

andejoh/r/MensRights22/08/18 04:31 PM
1

andejoh/r/MensRights09/09/15 07:33 AM
1

andejoh/r/MensRights18/06/16 03:32 AM
1

Discriminationandejoh/r/MensRights29/08/18 05:18 PM
1

andejoh/r/MensRights08/08/16 03:04 AM
0

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights19/08/21 07:16 PM
0

andejoh/r/MensRights13/02/16 05:22 PM
0

Feminismandejoh/r/MensRights26/12/18 04:01 PM
0

andejoh/r/MensRights16/09/18 01:47 AM
0

Progressandejoh/r/MensRights01/09/21 04:32 PM
0

andejoh/r/MensRights04/08/17 04:21 AM
0

andejoh/r/MensRights02/09/16 01:50 AM
0

andejoh/r/MensRights26/12/15 06:53 PM
0

andejoh/r/MensRights20/01/16 11:15 PM
0

andejoh/r/MensRights01/07/16 06:27 AM
0

andejoh/r/MensRights19/11/15 08:23 PM
0

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights30/10/18 04:45 AM
0

andejoh/r/MensRights09/04/16 01:35 PM
0

andejoh/r/MensRights30/09/16 04:16 PM
0

Marriage/Childrenandejoh/r/MensRights29/03/18 09:38 PM
0

andejoh/r/MensRights11/01/19 08:12 PM
0

Generalandejoh/r/MensRights29/10/15 07:16 AM
0

andejoh/r/MensRights22/11/15 08:49 AM
0

Social Issuesandejoh/r/MensRights27/06/22 06:54 PM
0

Questionsandejoh/r/MensRights01/05/17 07:22 PM
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 4,377 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
28

I'm very cautious about it. I'm not sure what to make of it yet. They can't demonize someone for decades and expect to say a few things and be welcome with open arms. Still, one could hope.
/r/MensRights01/05/25 03:29 PM
15

It's not, but providing the vaccine was until recently. There hasn't been any attempt to ameliorate historical discrimination either as far as I'm aware.
/r/MensRights14/08/24 06:41 PM
7

Not just that though. My doctors haven't and probably never will ask about it. I keep up with men's issues and learned about it when there was a push to get boys vaccinated s veral years back. I wonder how many men in their 20s and 30s don't even know about it let alone those older.
/r/MensRights14/08/24 05:48 PM
4

I thought about that before they lowered the age on prostate cancer screening The age for breast cancer screening was lowered. I wondered why they didn't at the time lower the age for prostate cancer screenings. I wonder how many lives that would have saved. I'm my mind, it would have been different if there was medical consensus on breast cancer screenings, but there was a split in the medical community. Some suggested that false positives would lead women to undergo unnecessary cancer treatmen…
/r/MensRights14/08/24 05:29 PM
37

It's frustrating that they never seem to have diversity weekend for men in female dominated fields at least not exclusively for men / boys.
/r/MensRights19/06/23 09:00 PM
1

It probably isn't legal in this case. In some jurisdictions like Illinois, it's been found to be legal in night clubs because the courts ruled that men benefited from ladies nights by having more women to hit on. I can't see that reasoning in this case because people primarily go to a casino to gamble not to look for dates. I'd consult a lawyer and maybe look to file a class action lawsuit.
/r/MensRights16/06/23 07:58 AM
8

It was striking the girls didn't seem to have a problem with it. What were they expecting? Did they think the girls would stand or refuse the chocolate? Meanwhile 4/5 of people being killed in Iran fighting for women's rights are men. Maybe THAT should have sparked a conversation about the empathy gap.
/r/MensRights12/03/23 09:18 PM
5

Most wealth is actually in the hands of women acquired through marriage rather than work. OK, so women have to step it up. It's not the fault of men that women don't choose to invest in women's start ups, women don't vote for women CEO, don't support women candidates, etc.
/r/MensRights24/02/23 09:59 PM
1

If you look at it as a calendar, these are the highlighted days, it's not so bad. Of course, this presupposes an email comes out each month and events are treated similarly. If they do mother's day, they mention father's day, etc. The bigger issue I have is that they have a university sanctioned event for white ribbon day and nothing comparable for November or International Men's Day. Could this be because no one has purposed it? Could be. You should propose something and see what happens. There…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/12/22 03:51 AM
2

Without reading the study, I'm pretty sure it didn't account for hours worked. If it did, they would mention pay rate. On the other hand, we don't know if men's productivity reduced to the level of their pay.
/r/MensRights23/12/22 05:36 PM
35

Seems the author is assuming things. She's fed up with her "diva behavior". It may not been because of the dv or even mainly because of the dv. Anniston is also not calling for her to be cancelled. Men are cancelled. Women get an opportunity for redemption.
/r/MensRights23/12/22 04:44 PM
1

If she's accused of a false allegation, she would have the same protections and assumptions as a man accused of rape. Why is this suddenly insufficient?
/r/MensRights23/12/22 04:35 PM
1

Why would she relay it if she didn't believe it?
/r/MensRights18/12/22 04:10 AM
1

But how many were made to penetrate? The number of men raped by women is often obscured by legal definition. The other question is how many of the women abused were abused by other women? Women can be both the majority of victims AND the majority of perpetrators.
/r/MensRights17/12/22 06:47 AM
3

Why would that mean he wanted more women to die rather than the truth be recognized that men were disproportionally affected?
/r/MensRights23/11/22 12:24 AM
6

The issue is it attempts to hide the number of men killed.
/r/MensRights21/11/22 04:53 AM
10

34 boys. 69 - 26 (women) - 9 (girls) = 34 boys.
/r/MensRights21/11/22 04:42 AM
1

So why shouldn't we support a change in the law, but insist on an equal application of it until it's changed?
/r/MensRights16/11/22 01:36 AM
2

And how does he live in the meantime if she's the sole bread winner? Why can't we compartmentalize? He's entitled to half marital assets. He should get them. If he's proven guilty, she could always sue him for damages.
/r/MensRights15/11/22 07:35 PM
1

You can always show them the pictures of the deviated cities if they're not smart enough to figure it out. Where will they get the new certificate if they're in shambles. It might not be true in every city, but it is in large parts of the country. If they're still unconvinced, point our many thought requiring an ID actually prevents non-disabled people from voting. Having to go to another state prevents women from accessing abortion.
/r/MensRights14/11/22 12:54 AM
3

That depends. Was that information blocked by law? I think England doesn't allow a digital search of rape accusers.
/r/MensRights30/10/22 12:29 AM
3

Look up empathy gap.
/r/MensRights16/10/22 04:01 AM
2

A lot of the higher paying jobs are also more dangerous or have worse working conditions. The gender occupational death gap is like 10 times higher than the gender wage gap.
/r/MensRights09/10/22 04:18 AM
18

Patriarchy theory certainly does claim ALL men are advantaged over ALL women in ALL instances. All other things being equal, it is absolutely a tenet of feminism that HE was advantaged in this situation. Additionally, many feminists have moved away from non consensual sex or even non enthusiasticily consensual sex is rape to rape equals non consent and a power imbalance. Modern feminists have really gone back to Mary Koss. They don't believe women can rape men.
/r/MensRights02/10/22 04:00 PM
1

From what I understand, more boys are born than girls even in places where sex selective abortions are not widely practiced. If more boys are born and there is no sex selective abortion, statistically you'd expect more boys would also be aborted because women would be more often pregnant with boys. I point that out in case you do find an actual study. It would have to account for that. I believe there was a study or studies done on sex preference and the majority of people stated a preference fo…
/r/MensRights02/10/22 07:29 AM
1

I'm not familiar with dating sites, but at least a long time ago, I heard they had body type. Granted that's a bit more subjective than weight, but it kind of gives you any idea.
/r/MensRights26/09/22 02:42 AM
1

If you can make more money at work than you would pay to have someone handle your domestic chores, why aren't you doing that? I'm guessing you can't or you just like having near total autonomy on how and when you do your work.
/r/MensRights25/09/22 03:14 AM
1

Be prepared to debunk the punching up argument by pointing out that occupiers have literally killed all men and older boys as well. My maternal grandfather was killed by Japanese soldiers who were going from house to house rounding up and killing men and older boys in world war 2. My uncle hid on the roof.
/r/MensRights16/09/22 04:52 AM
9

No one pride itself on not having diversity, but if you look at start ups, you have a greater possibility of finding one. Diversity over merit is a luxury the established companies can afford so you have people complaining that there are no female founders then when the companies become successful and hire a diversity officer, they claim that successful companies are those who value diversity. It's the other way around. Successful companies can afford wasting money on diversity.
/r/MensRights16/09/22 04:22 AM
1

Remember about 10 years ago they were debating VAWA. Democrats wanted to expand it to native Americans, but actually blocked it's passage until Republicans dropped their demand to extend it to white men. Feminists would rather not help women if it means helping men as well.
/r/MensRights06/09/22 11:50 PM
2

Self esteem impacts men's relationships, but not women's. Men who have high self esteem are confident enough to ask women out so are more likely to be in a relationship or single by choice. Women don't ask men out so self esteem is irrelevant. It took research to figure that out?
/r/MensRights05/09/22 08:52 PM
1

I'll paraphrase something a woman told me. The concept of privilege is there so you don't have to care. Helping men is unnecessary because they're privileged. Feminism is misandry.
/r/MensRights03/09/22 11:28 PM
1

There are also safe haven laws which is essentially unilateral parental surrender. It's essentially the "paper abortion", but essentially only available to women.
/r/MensRights02/09/22 02:17 AM
2

I don't have a problem with women having high standards. The issue is they don't give men enough reason to meet that standard. Why should I get a doctorate, work 60 hours a week, and earn 6 figures plus to date her?
/r/MensRights30/08/22 06:06 AM
3

When you cancel your subscription let them know why when possible. I did that with my P&G E-mail sign up. I told them I wouldn't buy P&G products anymore because of the Gillette toxic masculinity commercial so I wouldn't be needing the coupons or product info anymore.
/r/MensRights15/08/22 03:12 AM
0

Untrue. The U.S. government views maternity leave as two separate things, recovery and bonding. Companies are not legally responsible to provide any maternity leave, but if they provide maternity leave for bonding, they're required to provide an equal amount for fathers. Recovery time only benefits female employees so it should be illegal if the law was properly applied (disparate impact). What conditions that affect only or mainly men can men take off work without using sick time?
/r/MensRights25/07/22 12:56 AM
0

It should be sick leave only. What male conditions like hernias can men take PTO without using sick or personal time?
/r/MensRights25/07/22 12:47 AM
1

So we shouldn't be happy about greater equality because someone might choose to do something foolish? You could certainly celebrate the end of roe and oppose foolish laws. That doesn't even count that roe doesn't exist under the constitution and the activist court that created it used flawed reasoning. Roe should have allowed abortion up to birth if the fetus was not a person or should have banned it after viability under the competing interests doctrim. The baby would have more extreme harm so …
/r/MensRights24/07/22 04:28 AM
-6

Maternity leave is illegal because it's a benefit that primarily or solely benefits women (disparate impact provision in discrimination law) which people ignore because they view it as a societal good while demanding women be allowed to have abortion on demand.
/r/MensRights24/07/22 03:06 AM
4

Something about equality feeling like oppression when privilege is lost.
/r/MensRights14/07/22 04:42 PM
1

And they only think it might be a good idea to provide men with options when they perceive it as benefitting women.
/r/MensRights11/07/22 04:55 AM
0

Of course a person's religion magically causes the masks to seal properly hence they're working on granting exemptions for religion. /s
/r/MensRights06/07/22 11:54 PM
1

I usually see that the other way around. They don't really care who goes in there. They want to make sure no men are lurking in the women's room.
/r/MensRights29/06/22 10:02 PM
2

Joy Behar threatening to withhold sex is like Jim Jones threatening to withhold the Kool aid - Greg Gutfeld
/r/MensRights29/06/22 02:10 AM
1

That seems to be the disconnect and there could be more to the story. Men are held responsible for giving women who seek attention attention.
/r/MensRights28/06/22 02:29 AM
2

If there was no adoption or safe haven laws, but even in anti-abortion states, just abandon the kid in a safe haven location and your done.
/r/MensRights27/06/22 07:42 PM
1

Since there are stds, men already face all these things. Factor in infant male genital mutilation, they've already faced the risk of death and had their lives altered and they didn't even have sex.
/r/MensRights27/06/22 03:16 AM
1

When and boys are raped by women, should they be forced to procreate or should they be able to complete their rapist to have an abortion?
/r/MensRights25/06/22 02:55 AM
1

See those who believe masculinity is a psychological disorder?
/r/MensRights11/06/22 04:07 AM
10

Carruth's wife is a judge according to the article.
/r/MensRights08/06/22 11:06 PM
1

Did I miss something? It doesn't look like she was hit at all. So men are responsible for ensuring women are not distressed now? Is that the argument?
/r/MensRights05/06/22 09:26 PM
11

It was started by a male feminist. There was a power struggle. I'm not sure, but he lost control of his own site. It wasn't that bad about 10 years ago. Glenn Poole was even one of the editors. They had articles from 1in6. There was a huge feminist bent, but they weren't particularly quick to ban people. A lot of MRAs we're in the comments and a few even contributed articles. It got really bad when they moved to a subscription model. I was hopeful for it, but it never got to the point where it m…
/r/MensRights05/06/22 09:19 PM
1

Well technically only women can end women perpetrated DV. Men can only respond to it after the fact.
/r/MensRights03/06/22 11:58 PM
2

What's even weirder is that she perjured herself in the UK trial. That's beyond doubt.
/r/MensRights02/06/22 09:55 PM
1

That means you already did.
/r/MensRights02/06/22 09:41 PM
2

Equality feels like oppression to those with privilege.
/r/MensRights02/06/22 09:08 PM
2

"She now has an opportunity to appeal the jury verdict. But unless new evidence or testimony emerges in the aftermath of this blockbuster six-week courtroom drama, little will change from today's outcome. It is not yet clear if Heard's legal team plans to appeal." Does the BBC not understand the implications of what they said or are they just so idiologically blind that facts / truth don't matter? She has to literally post $8.35 million in order to appeal. Theoretically she owes the ACLU, who ho…
/r/MensRights02/06/22 06:36 PM
3

So does that qualify as a man tax?
/r/MensRights31/05/22 05:29 PM
1

I think Amber could win based on the closing argument of her lawyer. I haven't been keeping up with the trial basically I know what I've seen in the snippets of media reports I've come across. Depp's lawyer could have addressed it. He said Heard only has to prove one instance of abuse to win. I don't know if that's the legal standard, but even if it's not, if unaddressed people could be convinced that it's the case. I know that a single or even a few instances of inappropriate behavior would not…
/r/MensRights31/05/22 05:26 PM
1

There's also oral sex. That would be rape as well if you believe decieving someone about your gender results in rape as the OP's article suggests. Here's an article. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10862373/Jurors-deliberating-former-football-players-murder-trial.html Not sure if this was a gay panic defense. I've never seen that work although in theory a man should be able to kill his rapistand get away with it as much as a woman does. It seems in this case there may have been an eleme…
/r/MensRights28/05/22 07:14 AM
-1

Is it hypothetical? I don't know enough about transwomen to determine whether man could have sexual intercourse with them and not know they were trans, but some states have banned the "gay panic defense". Men have engaged in sexual activity with people they didn't know were trans.
/r/MensRights26/05/22 05:56 PM
1

Women lost more paid work and did more unpaid work. No shit Sherlock. Were they supposed to stay home and just do nothing?
/r/MensRights25/05/22 03:09 AM
3

Under union organizing rules, he can discuss working conditions without fear of retaliation.
/r/MensRights24/05/22 05:18 PM
2

Hopefully you're in your 20s. It's a mistake for people to think it's about making money. It's about what you do with the money. I work to make money has less perspective than I work to keep my house. A woman once said when you're on your death bed, what do you think about? Most people think about their family and what they did together. Few of any focus on that promotion they got, that car they bought, etc.
/r/MensRights17/05/22 02:53 PM
2

Well then I'm different because I support it. Have since the 70s. A teacher asked us who supports the ERA. Every girl and I raised our hands. No other boy did. Then the teacher said if it passes women will need to sign up for the draft. Now who supports the ERA. Every boy's hand went up. None of the girls.
/r/MensRights16/05/22 11:54 PM
3

I mentioned that, but he wants to eliminate the policy because of that instead of just dealing with employee. What we don't know is if any other men took it and he thought it was not abused. It could certainly be that be believed any cis man taking it is abusing the system. We also don't know why he believes that women aren't abusing it. If multiple male employees are calling it father's day, maybe they know something you don't. I had a manager who didn't realize an employee was doing what this …
/r/MensRights16/05/22 10:34 PM
8

Sure, but outside of personal practices and a few select positions, isn't that universally true about everyone? One person takes off, the work still gets done. A doctor's office may "shut down" when the doctor's on vacation. I knew a woman who's husband was a robotics expert. There were like 4 people working in that factory. The robots / machines did most of the work. She was complaining to me that he was only allowed to take vacations within a few hours of the company because if there was a pro…
/r/MensRights16/05/22 09:29 PM
8

And in some countries they retire a lot earlier too.
/r/MensRights16/05/22 08:48 PM
3

The double standard in the law. The article talks about a company policy put in place to address a double standard in the law. Unless this is the only company in that country or all other companies have addressed the same issue and company policy has the same wait as the law iwithin a company, there is still a double substantive double standard.
/r/MensRights16/05/22 08:47 PM
5

Not asking for it, legislature awarded it. They didn't just award it. Women asked for a change in the law.
/r/MensRights16/05/22 08:42 PM
7

We don't take glasses away from people who can't see well or canes from people who can't walk. We don't ask for documentation. That's true unless they ask for accomodation like a disabled parking spot or disability payments. Then we ask for proof. These women are asking not for a day off. They're asking for a day off with pay.
/r/MensRights16/05/22 06:08 PM
137

I thought about that and that's really the way I'd like to go, but I also know that if we gave a personal health day each month for everyone, you'll still have people saying that women face all that AND menstration so they should get that and a period day.
/r/MensRights16/05/22 05:04 PM
7

Starving is a lot slower then drowning. It take women like 84 years to die of "starvation". I'm guessing those guys didn't last more than a few hours.
/r/MensRights15/05/22 08:24 PM
2

I get upset when they change a characters sex or race for diversity. It's precisely because there is no limit to potential characters. They could create non-white and female characters.
/r/MensRights12/05/22 09:07 PM
4

Nudity in film definitely serves a purpose. It's purient. People watch nudity for the sake of seeing naked people. It doesn't advance the story line, but people enjoy it. I think it was Bridgerton where people complained that they cut the nudity out. I sort of remember something like that with Spartacus too. People like seeing famous people nude: Celebrity Skin, Hollywood Babylon, etc. I also think that particularly with women they watch nudity in conjunction with something like a play, Naked Bo…
/r/MensRights12/05/22 07:37 PM
5

I'm more pointing out the difference in reactions. When women have their privacy violated, you get articles saying that if you look at the pictures, you're participating in their violation. When it happens to men, it's a "treat". The articles are there. I just didn't feel like reading or linking them. Have to watch your mental health. You can only have so much upset in a day.
/r/MensRights12/05/22 03:39 PM
1

And if your rapist chooses to a have the child? Maybe we should demand exceptions for rape and incest from the pro choice states as women aren't the only peopled and men aren't the only rapists. If the argument is a woman should be able to kill an innocent to reduce trauma from a rape. Surely, we should be able to force a rapist to have an abortion to reduce trauma to her victim. A forced abortion is less than death and a rapist actually has culpability.
/r/MensRights12/05/22 02:48 AM
1

You don't just identify as something else, dumbass.
/r/MensRights12/05/22 02:37 AM
1

If it's not codified by a state then it's actually not a right in that state.
/r/MensRights12/05/22 02:18 AM
2

It raises a red flag. Why would you ask for help without enough details for people to give you advice? In the event it's actually legit, I gave him the only advice where he could actually get recourse. If it's legit and he addressed the sub when he got the complaint, my suggestion would have been file a counter Title IX complaint. It wouldn't be a lie based on today's 'woke" interpretation . He wouldn't have had sex with her if he knew she was lying to him about consenting or she would lie to th…
/r/MensRights11/05/22 08:14 PM
7

One post, no comment history, no details, what are you expecting? Call a lawyer.
/r/MensRights11/05/22 04:47 PM
2

"Fear of death is different than not being able to go dancing." Except that's not what battered spouse syndrome says. The article never said he didn't fear for his life. Now, they're saying that's absurd. Well look at the other article I posted about the expansion of battered spouse defense. The fact she didn't call the police or do anything short of hiring an assassin didn't prevent the court from saying that this is a legitemate extension of the battered spouse defense. Does it make sense to h…
/r/MensRights11/05/22 04:20 PM
11

And that excuses Disney for selling out to China or not supporting hay rights when it hurts their bott line?
/r/MensRights11/05/22 03:19 AM
1

I posted because there's a feminism tag. We recognize feminist orgs tend to advance policies / laws that are anti-male. Anything that weaken a feminist org helps men.
/r/MensRights09/05/22 08:49 PM
1

Disagree. We have step 1 and some men are spared child support OR we have se men spared heartbreak because the children they wanted were not aborted. We could be subject to women's whims or we could be in the same boat.
/r/MensRights08/05/22 03:20 AM
8

Abortion is only a win for men if he agrees with the mother because he has ZERO rights.
/r/MensRights08/05/22 01:13 AM
2

It's easy to comprehend once you drop the assumption that it's fair. Law often is what benefits women.
/r/MensRights07/05/22 04:23 PM
7

Really, what reproductive rights are they extending to men?
/r/MensRights07/05/22 04:14 AM
4

This is exactly the right time for "whataboutism". If they ask for our help predicate it on getting theirs.
/r/MensRights07/05/22 04:13 AM
1

It would be hypocritical for people to demand pro-life states to have an exception for victims of rape and incest and not expect the same from pro-choice states. The argument they use is the baby is innocent, but the blame for killing it falls on the rapist. We should do this to spare the victim added trauma. If true, why shouldn't a rapist be forced to undergo an abortion to spare trauma to their victim. Forced abortion is less than death and a rapist is more culpable than an innocent. EDIT - t…
/r/MensRights07/05/22 03:34 AM
3

How many men have already been forced into fatherhood? It's not like men had the ability to avoid fatherhood by getting an abortion. Will Gillebrand or feminists in general support the "paper abortion" for men? Many oppose it. They no problem with men being forced to support women's choices.
/r/MensRights07/05/22 01:58 AM
3

Men have actual gotten SCOTUS to indicate that a male only draft is unconstitutional. SCOTUS passed on a ruling to give Congress time to come up with a solution. This has majority support in the house, senate, and supposedly Biden. To my knowledge Gillebrand has never called for the elimination of the filibuster to fix selective service as she did for voter "protection" or abortion rights. How much then does she support draft fairness. NOW's position was to eliminate the draft or extend it to wo…
/r/MensRights07/05/22 12:58 AM
4

1% had abortions because a partner (or parent) didn't want a kid. It begs the question how many gave birth despite their partners not wanting the child?
/r/MensRights06/05/22 11:21 PM
3

A big part of the MRM supports abortion rights as do I. Maybe she shouldn't expect men to more actively support the right to abortion than she expects women to oppose the draft.
/r/MensRights06/05/22 10:17 PM
3

Sure. The issue is that she'll fight tooth and nail to keep abortion legal even get rid of the filibuster and stack the court even if the majority in certain states want to make it illegal. She hasn't even introduced legislation to repeal the sanctions for failure to register for the draft. She might have an argument for not pushing for repealing the draft since it's not currently happening, but that argument rings hollow since men are currently being sanctioned for not registering and she hasn'…
/r/MensRights06/05/22 10:13 PM
5

It's comparable because in either case a person loses bodily autonomy. People are planning her because she has such disregard for men's issues that she implied men need to make a special effort to imagine it. I can actually remember it. Between about 1991 and 2010 ish, I and many of my male friends and family discussed our concerns about being drafted into the war in Iraq ( desert storm / desert shield) and Afghanistan. I'm gonna guess she wasn't. Some of us said they'd leave the country. I also…
/r/MensRights06/05/22 10:05 PM
2

They also make a big deal about most people wanting to keep abortion legal. They never the majority of people want it restricted. If they really wanted the rule of the majority, roe wouldn't be over turned, it would be amended to ban abortion in the third trimester.
/r/MensRights06/05/22 06:44 PM
9

Didn't women have back alley abortions when it was illegal or was that just propaganda? People currently face sanctions for failure to register for the draft. What was the abortion right derived from again? The right to privacy ironically enough. Women can still go to another state to have an abortion even if roe is overturned. Going to another state won't help a man with the draft.
/r/MensRights06/05/22 06:36 PM
53

That's a life time not 9 month condition.
/r/MensRights06/05/22 05:13 PM
5

Because they doubt she actually said it? Only a fool would disregard the truth because they don't like who said it.
/r/MensRights06/05/22 05:07 PM
36

Imagine having no say in an irreversible modification of your genitals.
/r/MensRights06/05/22 05:03 PM
13

Or msn, cnn, abc, huffpost, wapo, cbs, nbc
/r/MensRights06/05/22 04:40 PM
7

Imagine some might not be content with just reading the main stream narrative.
/r/MensRights06/05/22 04:33 PM
138

And if you dare to work harder to maintain your standard of living, you can be forced to pay more. You can work harder and still not be where you used to be.
/r/MensRights06/05/22 04:32 PM
1

No, I'm suggesting that's the worst of all worlds. Out and out denial would not be believed. Telling the truth that it's similar to the rates of men abusing women would be ideal. Admitting that it's true, but extremely rare makes people believe the lie. Believing the lie has serious consequences. The part I really question in your comment is that people are becoming aware that it's not rare. I'm not sure it's true. I don't know I disagree. I'm just unsure it's true, but that's why feminists took…
/r/MensRights06/05/22 02:21 AM
6

It was reduced from rape to sexual assault. That among other things including feminism's own rape is rape campaign, puts the lie to the feminists claim that we don't need to recognize the rape of men by women because women could be charged with sexual assault, which they say has the same punishment.
/r/MensRights06/05/22 01:25 AM
1

I respect your opinion, but not sure I agree. There are massive powers trying to suppress the fact women abuse men. Look at the definition of rape. It hides 99% of female perpetrated rapes of men and boys. What's worse is that made to penetrate gets lumped into other sexual / intimate partner violence. It gets conflated with someone stalking or verbally harassing you. Other institutions can then hide while pretending they care about men. I looked at I believe it was the university of Oregon. The…
/r/MensRights05/05/22 01:07 PM
2

There are three things to consider. First, was Depp abusive? Probably, he threw objects and punched walls. He grabbed or smashed her phone. I don't remember which. When Taylor Swift had the video blank spce, we all agreed that it depicted her being abusive because she burned his stuff. I don't have an issue calling breaking items abuse. Second as feminists like to point out, there are levels of abuse. The abuse she perpetrated on him was a lot more serious than anything he did to her. Severing a…
/r/MensRights03/05/22 10:57 PM
1

Did they really not know or did they just not care until women spoke out?
/r/MensRights02/05/22 06:20 PM
1

Terrible headline. Why is it a question instead of a statement?
/r/MensRights30/04/22 10:37 PM
6

What about sex equity? I suspect wanting more sex than your partner and expecting them to "split the difference" would be considered abusive.
/r/MensRights30/04/22 10:14 PM
1

Feminity so fragile.
/r/MensRights29/04/22 09:11 PM
10

Unless you think men's rights include challenging / changing social norms that disadvantage men of course.
/r/MensRights29/04/22 06:55 PM
5

I think it has more to do with the gender imbalance in college. Women have to be more aggressive if they want to date.
/r/MensRights29/04/22 06:53 PM
2

Or it's girls will be girls rationalizing bad female behavior.
/r/MensRights18/04/22 02:20 AM
194

Leaving half the population behind has bad consequences for everyone and society in general. Whodathunkit?
/r/MensRights18/04/22 02:15 AM
1

Ummm, people usually don't just ask if it's your time of the month. It's usually a reaction to "bitchy" behavior. I wonder if anyone asked him what behavior prompted him to inquire? I wonder if he even meant it as misogynist or if it's an attempt by him to rationalize (excuse) her unprofessional / unfair / unreasonable behavior. Women on their period will be women on their period like boys will be boys.
/r/MensRights18/04/22 01:26 AM
11

Based on my reading, he got shafted. His income was derived from the business Her's was part time employment and ssi. She got to keep all her income and got half the business. The initial court decision was he could essentially keep the business and home to provide for the kids until the youngest was "of age". Now he essentially lost half the assets, probably his income since he has to sell the business, and the children's home since he has to sell the home. In most divorces I'm familiar with wh…
/r/MensRights18/04/22 12:31 AM
8

Maybe except for the dishonesty. First, they lumped women and children together to get the 90 percent. Men and children may have been over 50 percent. IDK, I'd need the percentage of children. Second, she mentions mum's specifically. It's my understanding single father's with children were allowed to leave. If I'm correct, mum's would imply these dad's don't face the same issues.
/r/MensRights14/04/22 06:27 PM
18

Women aren't 90 percent of the victims of forced migration though. Women and children added together are. It could certainly mean children are the foremost victims, but that doesn't advance the feminist narrative.
/r/MensRights14/04/22 06:12 PM
13

That begs the question then what did he die of? If he didn't die of the punch, they should have been able to point to something else. Was it illegal to tell the court or did they not want the court to know? Is it illegal for the court to say? I don't think your cause of death is covered under privacy laws.
/r/MensRights04/04/22 02:49 PM
5

I suspect she's talking about DV shelters that have additional services for DV victims.
/r/MensRights01/04/22 04:08 AM
5

So they try to clarify it because they know it wouldn't be clear. IDK why they wouldn't just make the language clear in the first place. It's like they want to confuse people, but have an out in case people realize what they're doing.
/r/MensRights01/04/22 03:58 AM
50

Preference for girls doesn't seem to get the backlash having a preference for boys does.
/r/MensRights27/03/22 11:38 PM
2

Is it fake or actual inequality? Fake inequality, when corrected, becomes actual inequality just in reverse. For example the WNT soccer players. Let's assume they force "equal pay", but don't assume they don't have to give up the added job security and "perks" not included in the MMT contract, it would then be discrimination against the men. I believe the point is counter fake discrimination against women so you don't have to fix real discrimination against men later.
/r/MensRights22/03/22 04:45 PM
1

Venus and Serena played a man when they were in their late terms / early 20s. They played alternate sets against him. He supposedly chugged beer between sets and still decimated them. He was ranked like 200 in the world.
/r/MensRights20/03/22 01:12 AM
12

Agreed, I purposely didn't take a position on whether trans is a thing. It just wasn't relevant. If it's true, she should be able to compete in a women's sport. If it's not true, he should be able to compete in a women's sport based on how society treats men when women want to enter men's spaces.
/r/MensRights19/03/22 03:57 PM
9

So why wouldn't they just combine it with the women's services? It wouldn't cost any more. There's a reason why they keep it separate. Consider Many feminist run DV shelters / support lines assume men calling in are abusers trying to locate their victims. The equality act probably requires them to support male DV victims just like Title VII in the U.S. that bans federally funded organixations from discriminating based on sex. Keeping them separate allows them toskimp on services for men by keepi…
/r/MensRights18/03/22 03:37 PM
18

There are a lot of DV orgs that turn men away because they believe they're abusers trying to find information on the victims. Having a dedicated help line and services for men eliminates that concern. It's not that feminists started accepting that men are not inherently predators. It was set up because they believe men are inherently predators. It's still a good thing. I just wanted to point out that it probably didn't stem form feminists wanting to help men. It was probably the equality act in …
/r/MensRights18/03/22 03:26 PM
26

"feeling they won't be believed", it's not feeling, they won't.
/r/MensRights18/03/22 01:26 PM
1

So women can't bribe politicians?
/r/MensRights14/03/22 12:33 AM
1

En register for the draft because otherwise you can't get a student loan, federal job, etc. It's not like it doesn't have consequence.
/r/MensRights10/03/22 09:28 PM
24

Isn't Ukraine a democracy? If women can vote, doesn't that make them responsible for the decisions of their government? My mayor is female, does that me I have no responsibly to oppose any unfair policies she may enact that don't affect me?
/r/MensRights08/03/22 09:13 PM
31

It always women who FGM. It's mostly women who push the female beauty standard. So those are not real problems then?
/r/MensRights08/03/22 09:06 PM
1

Where I live everyone enters through the front because that's where the fare box and driver are. You can exit through the front or rear. Our trains are different. You pay when you enter the station instead of when you board. People enter through the front of rear doors.
/r/MensRights08/03/22 12:45 AM
1

The hpv vaccine was only given to girls until like the last two years. Women's reproductive health is covered under the ACA, but men's isn't.
/r/MensRights05/03/22 05:33 AM
4

And buses are homophobic I suppose because people don't enter through the back door. /s
/r/MensRights05/03/22 04:48 AM
19

Depending on where it took place, it may not even be breach of contract. If prostitution is illegal in that area the contract is not legally enforceable.
/r/MensRights05/03/22 04:46 AM
1

The cheerleaders got money because they were sexually harassed unless you think Kobe wanted the attention. Doesn:t seem likely. Reporters go into dressing rooms all the time. How do you not know this? Your boss can go in if it's his job and yes last I heard, they actually did have people in the dressing room making sure women didn't cheat for example padding their bras. Not ALL male CEOs, but many (moonvees, Alles) and at that this point, I'd even say most. There was a democratic female house me…
/r/MensRights03/03/22 05:19 PM
1

Didn't cheerleaders just make several million dollars because of it? Isn't that accountability? Wasn't the former President acting in his capacity as owner and allowed to be back there? Oh wait, they were underage because all doctors and nurses who've examined underage patients have gone to prison? I seem to remember a male senator resigning over a picture. What of numerous male removed over inappropriate conduct? Men certainly do face consequences. Women not so much and that's the point.
/r/MensRights03/03/22 04:25 PM
20

They're not, but it also isn't equal. For example, the last time I checked the NBA closed men's locker rooms for 15 minutes and then they were opened indefinitely. The WNBA, which has much of the same ownership as the NBA, opens the locker room for 20 minutes then closes it permanently. Male athletes have to shower and dress within 15 minutes of the end of the game. Female athletes only have to wait 20 minutes then the can dress undistrubed. The affect is make athletes are nude in front of femal…
/r/MensRights02/03/22 09:50 PM
0

I might agree, but $3,000,000 is usually an amount worth fighting for unless they believe they have a good chance of losing.
/r/MensRights28/02/22 03:48 PM
2

Isn't that why people swipe in theory? You're letting the other person know your interested. Why then would it matter who communicated first?
/r/MensRights28/02/22 03:15 PM
2

So if a guy pointed a gun at your head and demanded you're wallet, you wouldn:t give it to him? If I dead, should it matter to me who has the country?
/r/MensRights28/02/22 03:23 AM
3

Does Friday the 13th count? The original killer was the mom. It would become Jason in the subsequent films.
/r/MensRights24/02/22 04:14 AM
1

The quickest way to resolve it is to file civil rights complaints against the federally funded women's shelters. Under Title VII (I think, but it might be IX), they can't discriminate against men. If women's shelters are forced to accommodate men, women's groups will be demanding / funding shelters for men. That's why The Family Place in Dallas opened a men's shelter.
/r/MensRights19/02/22 10:08 PM
71

It used to be that, but they equalized it a couple years ago. Women have been throwing a fit ever since.
/r/MensRights15/02/22 12:44 AM
10

All FGM is performed by women so I guess it's not a problem after all, right? Right?
/r/MensRights15/02/22 12:40 AM
1

Unlike women who kill men? That's what you're saying when you're OK with them receiving lesser punishment.
/r/MensRights12/02/22 05:50 PM
1

I found it odd that they only wanted to ban it for sexual assaults. What about other forms of discrimination? They wanted to limit it to sexual assault because they viewed that as primarily to exclusively benefitting women.
/r/MensRights11/02/22 02:24 AM
1

Well the husband is the legal father too. So why do they get to sue? They wanted a baby. They got one. If biological is important and actionable hear, why shouldn't it be why a man's wife cheats?
/r/MensRights07/02/22 09:26 PM
1

They contracted for a baby. They got a baby. If a man wife / gf cheats and has a baby then she violated their contract as well just as much as this clinic.
/r/MensRights06/02/22 06:52 PM
3

They're only looking for a sh*t load of money because she's not the "right" DNA. Guess the "love" wasn't cutting it.
/r/MensRights05/02/22 10:21 PM
1

Marital rape would still be legal, but you'd actually have to be against women raping men to realize that.
/r/MensRights05/02/22 12:33 AM
1

There were people there probably because the mom unlocked it and let them in. She allowed the kids to have access to the gun.
/r/MensRights05/02/22 12:13 AM
1

She Claimed she didn't know, but going by the article, it never indicated how the gun got there. We just know it belonged to the dad. Unless they leave the car unlocked and he put the gun on there, then he did secure the gun. She put the kids in the car allowing them access to it.
/r/MensRights04/02/22 11:59 PM
1

Recreational marijuana is illegal, but illegality isn't necessary if she's impaired. A parent who's legally drunk could be charged with neglect.
/r/MensRights04/02/22 02:35 AM
1

The gun was secure. It was in a locked car. She let the kids in.
/r/MensRights04/02/22 02:33 AM
1

He did. The gun was in place his kids couldn't get to until their mom let them into the car.
/r/MensRights04/02/22 02:32 AM
1

Recreation marijuana is not legal in Louisiana.
/r/MensRights04/02/22 02:30 AM
1

The gun was in a locked car (secured by every legal definition) where kids couldn't get it until the mom put them into the car.
/r/MensRights04/02/22 02:29 AM
1

Why would you be sure there'd be charges when the Sheriff said it's inappropriate to charge now?
/r/MensRights04/02/22 02:27 AM
1

How is putting it in a locked car not securing it? The mother brought the kids into the car. He didn't.
/r/MensRights04/02/22 02:17 AM
2

It was in a supposedly locked car. If it was in a gun safe and someone else opened the gun safe doesn't mean it wasn't secured.
/r/MensRights04/02/22 02:15 AM
1

first we don't know how or when it got there. Assuming he put it in there, how is a gun unsecured if he left it in a locked car? He didn't bring the kids in there. EDIT:. Medical marijuana is legal not recreational. Her smoking it could very well be illegal.
/r/MensRights04/02/22 02:13 AM
1

How do you she didn't put it in there? The article didn't say he put it in there. They just said it's his gun.
/r/MensRights04/02/22 02:09 AM
7

Didn't you read his link? They tried in 2013 according to the date of the article. Feminists blocked it. The government listened to them. I see no path forward for male victims if female victims are protected. Consequently, I would rather see both groups eventually protected than one group protected a few months earlier than they would have been and the other never protected.
/r/MensRights03/02/22 11:49 PM
2

She wrongly accused him to extort him when she found out he inherited money according to the article.
/r/MensRights03/02/22 01:36 AM
3

Since we're speculating, how do you know she didn't do it herself? Maybe she committed some unsolved murders. Probably should sentence her for those just in case./s
/r/MensRights02/02/22 12:28 PM
4

I'm sure that there are since seemingly it includes DV that ends in murder, but assuming there hasn't, why wait? THAT would literally change nothing for the families of female victims.
/r/MensRights02/02/22 12:01 PM
10

It would just be unequal now. That literally changed things for them because they don't get the same level of justice as the families of female victims.
/r/MensRights02/02/22 11:49 AM
2

There are some principalled politicians. Dan Lipinski for example was anti abortion democrat who has not changed his stance even though in became a liability in a blue state. He was primaried twice. Won reelection the first. Lost the second. He's considering running again. Sinema and Manchin won't fold on the filibuster even though Sinema is in a purple state. Many politicians like Biden and Clinton will change positions based on polls or key voting blocks. I upvoted your comment. I just wanted …
/r/MensRights29/01/22 12:54 PM
1

It's my understanding that they extended the law on segregated bathrooms / locker rooms to approve the segregated gyms. The issue with segregated areas was under the human rights law each customer is supposed to have equal enjoyment. When they approved ladies nights, they argued that men benefitted too because it got more into the bars for them to hit on. The judges probably couldn't come up with a reason women only areas benefitted men. In theory if they added an equal men's only section, it mi…
/r/MensRights28/01/22 11:49 PM
4

I'm not sure the law allows for a women only work out area in Illinois. It allows for gender segregated gyms for sure, but it might be all or nothing.
/r/MensRights28/01/22 12:30 AM
4

So are they only going to send women out to service the women drivers or are male tow truck drivers the only men who can't rape a woman? Why would a "vulnerable" woman want man to come anyway?
/r/MensRights21/01/22 04:19 AM
2

That depends on why men get married. I doubt pre-marital sex is rampant in India. If the only or primary reason for men to marry is to have access to sex, then if they can't be assured access to sex, the reasonable response would be to not get married. That's not to say they shouldn't criminalize marital rape. They should. That's just to dsay that boycotting marriage seems to be the smart response.
/r/MensRights20/01/22 07:54 PM
19

That may actually have something to do with the equality act. Can they even legally do what the feminists want them to do?
/r/MensRights20/01/22 07:44 PM
39

They always have a response to that: “yeah, but it’s harm to men caused by other men” Then what we should do is have the male AAA employees only help men and have the female AAA employees only help the women.
/r/MensRights20/01/22 07:42 PM
2

"unpaid work"? Did I miss the huge population boom? If they're not raising children, why are they not working?
/r/MensRights19/01/22 04:41 AM
4

Women had an advantage in retirement. Shouldn't men have that too? Is this a mens rights group to help men live better lives? Or an anti women privilege group to make sure women live worse lives which has no effect on men at all? According to the article, they aren't increasing women's retirement age to achieve equality, but solvency. "In June, both chambers of parliament agreed on raising the retirement age for women by 64 to 65. Other elements of the reform package – which the government says …
/r/MensRights19/01/22 12:48 AM
1

I've been vaccinated twice. I got vaccinated by my PCP. How did I find out they offered the shot? He happens to be my mom's doctor too. His female office manager called my mom to ask her if she wanted the shot. She didn't call me, but my mom told me they offer it. Are men really less likely to take it or are they just not serviced by the medical profession to the same extent as women.
/r/MensRights17/01/22 08:47 PM
1

The right to vote for women in the US derived from racism. If black men could vote, women should be allowed to vote too. It should come as no surprised that feminism's resurgence in the 60s and 70s came immediately after black people fought for civil rights in the 50s.
/r/MensRights16/01/22 05:00 AM
21

It depends on whether she's a friend or family member.
/r/MensRights16/01/22 04:39 AM
2

Brian Banks was falsely accused of rape and got 5 years in prison. BTW his false accuser got about $2,000,000.
/r/MensRights16/01/22 01:04 AM
11

Feminists have also fought against charging women with rape in Israel. They also have not to my knowledge fought to recognize forced envelopment as rape in any country.
/r/MensRights15/01/22 11:08 PM
7

So when Brian reacted to her abuse, he wasn't being abusive? She admitted to hitting him first. People don't always lie.
/r/MensRights14/01/22 04:03 PM
15

I can support this If they instituted a draft of women until 40% of the military were women. It has nothing to do with equality. It's just equality of the "good stuff"
/r/MensRights13/01/22 05:32 PM
2

The point is just because you can "recover", it doesn't make something right or even OK.
/r/MensRights07/01/22 07:00 PM
8

Often intact penises. Often life enjoyment for 21 years, potentially instituting a draft they have no "skin in".
/r/MensRights07/01/22 12:06 AM
18

Having your wallet stolen doesn't deprive you of the opportunity to make money in the future either.
/r/MensRights06/01/22 03:46 PM
1

Is that what she's saying? I don't think so. What she's saying is if we hold ONE female CEO accountable, we must hold ALL male CEOs accountable. She doesn't say we have to hold ALL female CEOs accountable. EDIT: if she wanted ALL CEOs accountable not just the male ones. She would have gender out or mentioned female CEOs that weren't prosecuted either, but then you couldn't complain about gender discrimination then. The female CEO of HP had bugged the board meetings. That's a tech company. Ellen …
/r/MensRights06/01/22 06:09 AM
3

Why wouldn't you press charges? What if they don't believe you? They may not have to. In most states rapists can lose custody of their children and I don't believe the laws are gendered. You don't need to get a conviction for that to be the case either. You would rather run. Well want's stopping that? Couldn't you run after the court rules just as easily as before?
/r/MensRights06/01/22 04:42 AM
35

Also Sandburg is the COO of Facebook. Balwani was the COO of Theranos. His trial is coming up so why hasn't Pao decried Sandburg not be charged for genocide?
/r/MensRights05/01/22 07:21 AM
1

I think the key is "too damaged to resist". It suggests she could have no culpability. If she could have resisted and didn't than I would agree with you, but the article goes beyond that. It suggests that she might not have been able to resist. The article is suggesting a form of temporary insanity.
/r/MensRights05/01/22 07:05 AM
119

IMO that was also a cynical use of female privilege to game the system.
/r/MensRights04/01/22 11:10 AM
1

What was the standard of evidence? Was it clear and convincing or preponderance of the evidence?
/r/MensRights02/01/22 08:23 PM
3

It just suggested she wasn't responsible and a man was.
/r/MensRights02/01/22 06:30 PM
7

Are you suggesting that women are to blame when they abuse their sons who go on to commit crimes?
/r/MensRights02/01/22 06:22 PM
1

Or just call BS.
/r/MensRights01/01/22 09:53 PM
2

FYI some human rights laws in the US has a provision that bans making people feel unwelcome. In Texas, it banned discrimination in advertising. That's how that women only Wonder Woman screening ran afoul of the law. You can claim suggesting men pay more makes them feel unwelcome.
/r/MensRights01/01/22 09:50 PM
1

Maybe coding camps for boys where they'd get a small stoped would help, but what about the girls right? There are no trick answers either.
/r/MensRights01/01/22 02:24 PM
1

They have no problem blaming the victim. Look at women killing their supposedly abusive husbands. It just depends on who the victim is. Now I've heard some feminists complain that they're not really victims, but even in the Jodi Arias case, they still didn't decry victim blaming. That was my point. Even if she's right, not all abuse claims are true, but we're supposed to accept that as a legitimate defense and not see it as victim blaming.
/r/MensRights01/01/22 01:43 PM
5

When ALL the victims are one gender, why isn't gender an issue? Maybe they don't want to Target a response to boys. 30 boys were killed. Let's use that to help girls.
/r/MensRights01/01/22 01:30 PM
11

So when there are zero female victims, saying the majority of the victims are male isn't an improvement.
/r/MensRights01/01/22 02:31 AM
1

Maybe public open air urinals. I'm kind of torn on this one. It gives guys more places to pee, but there's little coverage. Some cities put them in to stop guys from peeing on buildings and such. I don't know why they just didn't install port a potties.
/r/MensRights23/12/21 09:18 PM
3

I'm pretty sure Israel has two different conscription ruled. It's like 2 years for men and 1 for women. Female soldiers are also not front line. Their chances of getting killed, though non-zero, is less than men's.
/r/MensRights23/12/21 09:01 PM
3

I haven't watched any new movies in years except for horror movies. I don't know how I feel about the Hunt. I knew it was woke going in, but who were the good guys? It wasn't the woke characters. Still, that wokism detracted from the movie. The sad thing is I grew up with comics. I can't watch any of the MCU. The DC movies I'm guessing pretty much suck too. I admit, I've looked at the newest season of Dr. Who and I'm unsure about the female Dr. She might be OK, but I think it's because she patte…
/r/MensRights23/12/21 07:42 PM
4

Tell that to the FBI and the CDC. I'm sure in these other states too, it's mainly men who can be charged rape. FYI:. Ally Fogg was trying to push the FBI. There was an argument that they maybe didn't have to. The definition could simply be reinterpreted to mean him penetrating her by force or her forcing him to penetrate her. It hasn't been interpreted that way, but people have made the argument.
/r/MensRights23/12/21 07:27 PM
2

He said "family unit" he he he. Sorry, I couldn't help it. Spillover from the topless discussion.
/r/MensRights23/12/21 06:20 PM
5

I'm on my phone and can't link or at least don't know how but, look up refinery 29 scout Willis free the nipple. She Instagramed (I think maybe tweeted) it was legal in New York City.
/r/MensRights23/12/21 06:14 PM
3

Thanks for posting. Normally I don't bother watching the videos, but decided to check it out. It hilarious. I recommend you not drink anything while watching, I almost spit that out.
/r/MensRights23/12/21 06:04 PM
4

On the other hand, this was the environment he helped create AND isn't he being held to the same standard and punishment he would advocate for another man? Certainly men and women should be held to the same standards, but that that they shouldn't have both been cancelled. It's that they should be treated the same. I'm saying in this case, he gets no sympathy from me.
/r/MensRights23/12/21 05:46 PM
2

Thanks, I didn't feel like watching it.
/r/MensRights23/12/21 05:22 PM
5

First, isn't he a white knight POS. Second, from what I remember, he had women remove their merkins during a scene he was supposed to pretend he was having oral sex with them. That went against against industry standards. That's the only thing I saw that he did wrong, but he still did something wrong. The big question for people who want to cancel him for that is why do they support Mindy Kaeling who admitted to french kissing actors without their consent.
/r/MensRights23/12/21 05:13 PM
6

Define functionally true. In many areas, there is a crime called rape. This crime does not recognize forced envelopment so 99% or so female rapists can't be charged with rape. It's true that some (maybe all) municipalities will have sexual assault laws with the same / similar punishments to rape, but NOW asserted in it rape is rape campaign that miscategorizing rape will reduce it's seriousness in people's minds. It won't get the resources it deserves. If you're a bottom line person, I know of n…
/r/MensRights23/12/21 04:57 PM
158

Not even universal. There are some areas where women can be legally topless. I think New York has an area.
/r/MensRights23/12/21 04:42 PM
1

I don't feel like watching the video, but I've seen those before. They've always had men read the tweets directed at the women. Is that the case here? That would make it actually different. In those their trying to make the men feel sorry for the women and reflect on their potential behavior. This case seems the producers just want to f*ck with the guy.
/r/MensRights23/12/21 12:24 AM
1

But men have already been punished, so we were supposed to wait for a woman to do it before we switched?
/r/MensRights21/12/21 11:24 PM
2

Not to sound crass, but isn't death always an option for these women? Rape victims actually pushed back on this maybe 10 years ago. It's certainly a stupid and cynical attempt to push a false narrative that rape is worse, but it could also be deadly if rape victims start to believe it. It wasn't like people who pushed this narrative cared about rape victims anyway. They were simply means to an end.
/r/MensRights21/12/21 11:18 PM
1

I'm 54. Since they made seat belts mandatory about 30 or so years, I've not encountered a car without adjustable belts. They might have been adjustable before. I just didn't really use them. I do want to point something out. Even if older cars didn't have adjustable seat belts and even if they were designed for the average sized man, they were designed for the average at that time. The reference man, which is not really men, but the average of men and women is like 170 lbs, which is closer to th…
/r/MensRights21/12/21 12:53 PM
1

No, wen are privileged because they have benefitted from the medicines (maybe not to the same extent) without having to sacrifice. That would be claiming a man had to work a 40 hour week, give 10 hours pay to a random unemployed woman, and claim he's privileged because he got to keep 75% of what he earned. Women will get the same benefit as men (maybe) when they make the same sacrifice. I say maybe because there's an eye medication that can only be made from men's blood because of women's immune…
/r/MensRights21/12/21 12:39 PM
1

Except thàt we have data. We know what the results are. We know women and are different sure, but what medicines have been found to not work on women that pharma is not working to fix?
/r/MensRights21/12/21 07:12 AM
1

Why? Maybe sexually charged jokes should be punished, IDK. What I do know is that if men are punished for them, then women should too.
/r/MensRights21/12/21 06:50 AM
1

There was an article on feministing maybe 10 years ago. I don't feel like looking it up, but you can look if you like. It concerned a high school girl who sent a (nearly certain) unsolicited pic to a boy she liked and is now facing criminal charges. It wasn't until I asked what made them think it was consensual that they considered the fact that he may not have consented to receive it in the first place. I asked if it was because he was a boy.
/r/MensRights20/12/21 05:39 PM
4

That's probably why it's illegal in most states. Women would have to start paying for their own things.
/r/MensRights19/12/21 11:37 PM
1

They don't, but if they're for gender equality, I'm going to expect them to walk the walk.
/r/MensRights19/12/21 11:32 PM
3

Or the feminists in Israel who successfully fought to prevent male victims of rape from charging their female rapists with the crime. Or the Michigan chapter of NOW who unsuccessfully fought against repealing the unrebuttable assumption that a woman's husband was the father of her child. It was more important to them to shield her infidelity than for a father to have "rights" to his child. They only lost because they were going up against a whose who of organizations pushing it.
/r/MensRights19/12/21 11:24 PM
8

You don't have to tell us not all feminists are the same. Erin Pizzy is beloved in the MRM. She started the first DV. shelter. She thought men deserved these shelters too so other (I'd go as far as saying all the feminists of consequence at that time) tried to run her out. Egalitarian feminists are few. Maybe it would be better if one person did speak for the group. There would be a better chance the movement would be for equality. From what I see, the overwhelming majority of feminists are fema…
/r/MensRights19/12/21 08:07 PM
1

I tend to be of the same opinion, but I've also had women ask while not asking. You should take me here. It's never worked and I don't know that there should be an issue rather than an uncomfortable irritant. That said I don't think the person who asks necessarily has to pay for the whole date as long splitting the check was discussed prior to or immediately after initial acceptance.
/r/MensRights19/12/21 06:16 PM
1

And that contributed what to the conversation? Do you know why it's more advantageous? Do you know what the ideal length? Does it matter if everything is relative? Most people assume a boxer's reach is advantageous when it's longer. It's true, but it depends. Optimum punching range is from your wrist to your knuckle. When your opponent is that range, you can hit the hardest. When the get inside your hands, you elbow slides out and you lose power. The advantage shifts to the guy with the shorter …
/r/MensRights19/12/21 06:03 PM
19

The only right men have that women don't that I can think of is the right to be topless in many instances. I've advocated to extend the right to women. I've made the case many times including on Jezebel that if they include topless women as being nude in films, they need to do the same with men. The resistance came from the Jezebel feminists. The site adopted this and the Jezies started to get irritated. There's also a huge difference between failing to advocate for equality and actively opposin…
/r/MensRights19/12/21 04:29 PM
1

I'd agree it's not men's right as long as body image issues aren't either. If anything this is more men's rights. You don't anyone's permission for you to accept your body as is and eat for anorexics or not take steroids, etc. You do need someone else acceptance to date though.
/r/MensRights19/12/21 03:39 PM
0

I could agree if there was no consequence, however, I've both experienced and heard different from other guys. IDK what the percentage of women who stop seeing guys after they don't pay for dates especially the first one, but I suspect it's high. Eddie Murphy said that he'd hear all these guys today talking about slavery say I wouldn't bail no hay. I would say suck my dck , master. Suck my mtherfcking dck. Then the whips would come out and OK master I'll bail that cotton. Didn't make slavery rig…
/r/MensRights19/12/21 01:49 PM
13

Maybe we should send her pictures of our middle fingers and ask her how long they look.
/r/MensRights19/12/21 01:33 PM
1

Is it really that simple when there is societal pressure? Take body image issues for example. If you're anorexic, you should have eaten more. If you don't want to take steroids, accept your body as is, etc. Where do you draw the between acceptable and unacceptable societal pressures? If 85% of men wanted to pay the bill and 15% of women expected them to, I would agree, but if an overwhelming percentage of women also expect this, what's the alternative? Don't date. Now if we ask the question what…
/r/MensRights19/12/21 01:44 AM
2

So since the system doesn't punish women who abuse men, the point still stands. You're saying that "anti female sentiment" is a valid result.
/r/MensRights18/12/21 11:51 PM
10

There are some states that have a special charge of battery by a man of a woman, which carries a longer sentence than a same sex battery or a woman battering a man. In California they made single stall bathrooms unisex. Because they counted stalls and not urinals, many multiple occupancy men's rooms became unisex while the women's remained women's at least that's my understanding. EDIT:. The right to privacy. Abortion rights were derived from the right to privacy, but if a man wants to protect h…
/r/MensRights17/12/21 07:36 PM
33

As many times as I've been in the men's room and had women barge in, for too long men have had to put up with behaviors in what should be private spaces that make them feel uncomfortable and violated.
/r/MensRights17/12/21 07:26 PM
3

I was at a party once and there was a woman who literally was hitting on every guy. My Spidey sense was tingling and I turned her down. A guy I was acquainted with took her up on it. A few months later, I heard she was pregnant. We told him to do the math. Generally speaking, I don't care if I receive unsolicited nudes from women if they're decent looking, but I also don't care to receive them. It always felt like there was an ulterior motive when women I didn't know we're too sexually aggressiv…
/r/MensRights17/12/21 07:20 PM
5

Sounds like their using "expansion" to push a false narrative (ie they take something that happens in similar numbers combine it with something else to make it seem more common). We've all seen it with that women and children are most victimized when men are more victimized than women. Maybe we should do something similar and trigger them. Men are 9 times more likely to be killed in a domestic violence or other situation than women.
/r/MensRights17/12/21 05:31 PM
3

I'm 5' 7". I've never had a problem dating women taller than I. That's true for all the guys I know who are my height or shorter. The resistance seems to only come from women.
/r/MensRights16/12/21 07:05 PM
1

They auto ban anyone who posts here.
/r/MensRights13/12/21 08:51 PM
1

That's only true if it's the average per mother and you're looking for the average per father. If it's the average per woman, it shouldn't be any more difficult or any less accurate to get the average per man.
/r/MensRights08/12/21 08:21 AM
2

According to the article, there were 5 senators who signed the amendment to oppose an inclusive draft. There were 95 other senators. It requires 60 to overcome a filibuster. Maybe there were 36 or more others. How do we know they were all conservative or Republican? It could very well be that a bunch of "progressive" / feminist law makers found them an easy excuse to drop a proposal they didn't support and still publicly claim they support it.
/r/MensRights08/12/21 01:32 AM
1

It's a bit more complex according to the article. Republicans objected to both a change in sexual assault adjudication and including women in the draft. Dropping draft fairness was a compromise. Could they have dropped whatever changes they made to handling rape cases instead of the male only draft? Maybe, but maybe the democrats support of an inclusive draft was always a bargaining chip.
/r/MensRights08/12/21 01:14 AM
1

They not only have a say on whether it's legal, they have a say and often the only say in whether it happens to their sons.
/r/MensRights06/12/21 05:25 AM
1

Laws won't deter the persistent. Would that be an argument for legalizing murder? I don't accept women will just do it anyway, but it might be bad for them as sufficient justification for keeping it legal. I'm also not sympathetic to women having back alley abortions because they don't want to pay child support for children men want since men have been in this position for decades if not centuries. The other thing to consider safe harbor laws. Women already have the right to unilaterally abandon…
/r/MensRights05/12/21 05:47 AM
3

I think she's wans to, but I don't think she will. Like the Rittenhouse mistrial, I suspect the judge would have declared a mistrial, but waited to see if it would be necessary. She doesn't want to overturn it, but can't see a constitutional way around it. She's probably hoping Congress repeals it.
/r/MensRights05/12/21 12:08 AM
1

That's why I said 5 years. They may not take it up in 5 years. It might be 10 or 15. Once it hits a certain point, it could be argued that Congress has had enough time to fix it.
/r/MensRights05/12/21 12:03 AM
4

There aren't swarms charged or convicted of it. The NISVS would disagree that there aren't swarms doing it.
/r/MensRights04/12/21 11:46 PM
2

https://www.npr.org/2021/06/07/1003270634/supreme-court-turns-away-challenge-to-the-rule-that-only-men-register-for-the-dr Sorry, not a ruling. They agreed not to rule to give Congress a chance to fix it. Still, the indication is it would be ruled unconstitutional.
/r/MensRights03/12/21 11:47 PM
7

Sue them again. From what I understand SCOTUS didn't abolish the draft because Congress was actively working to fix it. It was to give them an opportunity to fix it. I don't believe it's open ended. I think if you sued again in 5 or so years, you can make that SCOTUS needs to take immediate action.
/r/MensRights03/12/21 10:30 PM
2

The point is Roe v Wade does nothing for men. There are ways pre-birth and ways post-birth to remove financial responsibility for the child. Except for men's use of birth control, all options require the consent of the mother. Adoption in theory requires the consent of the father, although there are so many loop holes it's probably not the case. The adoption industry makes so much money there are foreign adoptions. From a men's rights perspective, the only affect overturning Roe v Wade has is to…
/r/MensRights02/12/21 10:26 PM
4

If a woman wants to keep the child and I don't, how does Roe v Wade help me? If neither of you wanted the child, what does Roe v Wade do that adoption doesn't?
/r/MensRights02/12/21 03:14 PM
2

There's also not much you can do about your height.
/r/MensRights02/12/21 02:24 PM
1

Women are 52 percent of the electorate in the U.S. They control more wealth last I checked. Choosing not to use power is not the same as not having any.
/r/MensRights02/12/21 02:36 AM
7

Isn't South Korea the place where feminists made fun of men's penis size with an emoji? Hard to imagine why people would think they were misandrist. /s
/r/MensRights02/12/21 02:24 AM
0

Some people think Ashley Graham looks good. She doesn't really do it for me, but she looks OK when they used fat girl angles.
/r/MensRights02/12/21 02:15 AM
3

At worst the same number of men would be in the dangerous jobs assuming no drafted women would be fit to serve, but many more men would not have their lives disrupted. About 2 percent of the desert storm casualties in Iraq were women. They were about 12 percent of soldiers in the Iragi theater. Even though drafted women might have a significantly reduced chance of being killed. It's non-zero (ie it's still safer for men to not go at all).
/r/MensRights02/12/21 02:07 AM
1

How do you know men created these structures and that the basic framework of men control the public sphere while women control the family sphere was not mutually consented to millennia ago?
/r/MensRights30/11/21 08:03 PM
2

Didn't they vote for the chicken hawks who voted for the war? Don't women also benefit from the "spoils of war"? I think there's a huge assumption that women didn't help create these structures people claim oppress them.
/r/MensRights30/11/21 08:00 PM
3

I'm guessing everyone who bothered to vote or comment.
/r/MensRights30/11/21 12:33 AM
11

NOW's original position was repeal the draft, but if we have one, it should be gender neutral. Now that it appears to become gender neutral, not only does their position change to repeal the draft only, but they're actively lobbying for it rather than just stating a position. BTW if 52 percent of women opposed a draft and 58 percent of ALL Americans opposed a draft according to the poll they cite, that means 64 percent of men opposed a draft assuming equal numbers of men and women were polled.
/r/MensRights29/11/21 02:47 AM
32

I'm surprised she got life in the first place.
/r/MensRights28/11/21 04:15 AM
2

We both know that’s not what the article is saying I disagree. They never examine what percentage of a man's diet is meat vs. what percentage of a woman's diet is meat. Men are about 5' 9" on average. Women are about 5' 4" on average. At the high end of the BMI chart men weigh about 31% more than women. At the low end men weigh about 35% more than women. If you look at men at the higher end of the BMI chart and women at the lower end, you'll get a difference of 41%+. If BMI is a healthy weight a…
/r/MensRights24/11/21 06:27 AM
1

Basically mob rule as long it's their mob.
/r/MensRights24/11/21 05:13 AM
9

I've noticed in the IT field a move away from college degrees to professional certifications. An A+ certification will get you farther than a bachelor degree.
/r/MensRights22/11/21 09:15 PM
2

Not quite as many as their tears though.
/r/MensRights13/11/21 05:09 PM
8

That's one of the issues I have with the story as presented. It encourages men to put themselves in harm's way. His mom was proud of him for helping someone. He was good Samaritan. If you think a crime is taking place call the police.
/r/MensRights12/11/21 11:02 PM
1

They should require only women to register for the draft. Let's tackle that historic discrimination.
/r/MensRights10/11/21 04:49 AM
1

How do you know he wouldn't donate even if they could prove? I suspect he actually would have. Not because I think he's particularly good, but because he'd probably find it worth it to be known as the man who ended world hunger.
/r/MensRights04/11/21 02:23 AM
3

My first thought was does that mean women are asking men out, paying for dates, etc? The answer was what I thought, no. The advice given to women is put yourself out there. How golden could his penis be if he still has to do the chasing? Just shows how entitled these college women are.
/r/MensRights03/11/21 08:52 PM
13

They could fix it. Just have a doesn't deserve it, but we need a token award.
/r/MensRights29/10/21 12:19 AM
4

Have another. You're welcome.
/r/MensRights26/10/21 06:38 AM
1

A woman needs a man like a fish needs a bicycle seems hard to confuse the intent.
/r/MensRights24/10/21 04:52 AM
2

From what I understand the rule is there could be different rules for boys and girls as long as neither gender is disadvantaged. I suspect girls aren't forced to wear their hair long (anymore).
/r/MensRights22/10/21 10:30 PM
2

I think the main argument is it's mainly men doing it to men so it doesn't count. I'd point out that in FGM it's ALWAYS women doing it to women so it shouldn:t count then.
/r/MensRights22/10/21 10:03 PM
3

Susan cooper
/r/MensRights18/10/21 04:45 AM
1

Difference being she killed him.
/r/MensRights13/10/21 05:19 PM
5

Sure, but of you drill down at least in the U.S., but I suspect the U.K. is similar, women who kill will kill an intimate about 30 percent of the time. Men who kill will kill an intimate about 8 percent of the time. Women, who kill, are about 4 times more likely to kill an intimate than a man who kills. I'm not saying it's definitely because she can get away with it. It could be because there's more emotion involved. It could be more opportunity or a mixture most likely.
/r/MensRights13/10/21 12:02 AM
33

This is why we need to have a military draft of women only. We should draft women until they make up at least 35 - 40 percent of the military.
/r/MensRights12/10/21 03:37 AM
6

There were some women maybe 20 years ago who argued for man sharing. They posited that it was better to share a multi millionaire with a couple other women than having a minimum wage man to yourself.
/r/MensRights12/10/21 03:25 AM
1

Fair point.
/r/MensRights08/10/21 03:11 AM
1

Exactly so you would think 30 percent of sexual assault felonies would be dropped if 8 percent of murders are, but it's not the case. Sexual assault cases are dropped about 1 percent more often. I think it could be a myth because it sounds like it should be the case. The data at least in this scenario doesn't seem to support it. Is the we need to reduce protections for rape accused to improve prosecutions addressing a problem that doesn't exist.
/r/MensRights08/10/21 03:09 AM
2

If people die because they were complacent and didn't fight, it's their own damn fault. Choices have consequences. The Afghans should have fought the Taliban if they didn't want to live under their rule. Don't expect some one else to do it for you.
/r/MensRights08/10/21 03:00 AM
3

To be consistent, he was actually found guilty according to the article. In theory, he was already given the benefit of the doubt (beyond reasonable doubt).
/r/MensRights29/09/21 02:17 AM
37

More men are killed than women. What does it say about how society values men that men haven't been given leaflets telling them how to stay safe?
/r/MensRights28/09/21 11:33 PM
7

Women are amazing. Somehow they're able to spend twice as much as men while making half as much. It's almost as if they're spending the money men are making.
/r/MensRights28/09/21 03:13 AM
7

Lesbian porn usually passes it.
/r/MensRights27/09/21 02:23 AM
1

MRAs don't want to shut down women's shelters, however, there was an instance of an MRA (Glen Sax) demanding a women's shelter (The Family Place), which received federal funds, to assist male victims of dv as was their obligation under Title IX. In fact MRAs are a lot less "vindictive" than feminists when it comes to this enforcement. Sax only demanded The Family Place assist male victims of dv. He didn't demand they get the equivalent services and conditions.
/r/MensRights18/09/21 04:58 AM
1

I'm pretty sure if a child was kidnapped, people wouldn't be suggesting that they legally be made children of the kidnapper if it went on for three years before discovery.
/r/MensRights18/09/21 04:35 AM
1

In the Petito case, the cop's was to separate them. That's what your no contact order is. It separates them. If there was actual evidence, he'd be in jail.
/r/MensRights18/09/21 04:30 AM
1

Oddly enough my mom and a friend's mom had known enough "women" to side against (warn me about) their gender.
/r/MensRights18/09/21 04:25 AM
3

Why is there a labor shortage. Weren't men told to lean back so women could lean in. Seems men are leaning back. Why aren't women leaning in?
/r/MensRights09/09/21 09:53 PM
2

Part of it is kids take 3 classes, the minimum to go full time. It takes 5 or 6 years to get a 4 year degree. It's the least cost effective way. When I went to college taking 3, 4, or 5 classes cost the same so I took 5 each term. I cut about half a year off.
/r/MensRights09/09/21 04:20 AM
1

You can always go with a technical certification. The cost varies by company and certification, but it's significantly less than college in time and money.
/r/MensRights09/09/21 03:54 AM
7

but if you want to get your gender mix more inviting for female applicants -- which is the ONLY reason you giver a shit about this stuff I upvoted this comment, but I'm not sure that this is the driver. I suspect a large part of this is economics an issue with enrollment numbers. I knew a guy at a college who wanted to help male students. He asked one of his collegues for advice. He was told that if you say you want to help men, it'll be DOA. If you frame it as boosting enrollment, you have a ch…
/r/MensRights07/09/21 10:17 PM
1

So you didn't notice my comment on post abortion men? Not criticizing, just pointing out it's been mentioned.
/r/MensRights03/09/21 06:39 PM
3

So you're suggesting men's suffering doesn't matter? I'm not surprised, but respectfully disagree.
/r/MensRights03/09/21 06:31 PM
1

https://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/new-guidelines-suggest-lifting-14-day-rule-growing-human-embryos-n1268628
/r/MensRights03/09/21 06:03 PM
2

But why wouldn't you push to end court ordered child support instead? Because you have the ability to do them simultaneously. You can push for both a legal abortion and an abortion ban. What you need to do in order to change people's minds is explain why this law is worse than having no reproductive rights at all.
/r/MensRights03/09/21 05:51 PM
1

you dont think women dont get mental issues after having an abortion? They might, but until they're forced to have one, why is it any issue that a person's choice has consequences. I find it strange that on a men's rights sub their are still those who advocate that only men should suffer any adverse affects for the choices they make.
/r/MensRights03/09/21 05:38 PM
0

The fetus suffers the greatest effect. Are we really absolutely certain they're not people? I don't mean just in the legal sense because slaves were legally 3/5 human. No one today would say that was true. If there's any doubt, the irreparable harm is to the fetus.
/r/MensRights03/09/21 01:58 AM
0

I'm on my phone so can't do a lot. Look up post abortion men. It's a fallacy to suggest men have no psychological attachment to unborn children.
/r/MensRights02/09/21 04:58 AM
2

As for the father, I would agree he shouldn't be able to demand a woman carry his child to term or pay $10k, if he wasn't forced to pay many times more for a child he didn't want her to carry to term. Don't misunderstand. I'm not suggesting the law is good. I'm suggesting it could be better than the current law. Under current law men have no reproductive rights. Whether they want to be father's or not, that is currently controlled by women. If abortion is banned at least the men who want the chi…
/r/MensRights02/09/21 04:55 AM
0

That's what I find both interesting and disturbing about the exception for victims of rape or incest. It's not just women who get raped. I've never seen these supposed "rape victim advocates" demand an exception for victims of rape or incest in pro-choice states. Should pro choice states force a rapist to either terminate or carry a child to term based on the wishes of their voctom? The thought behind the rape and incest exception in anti-abortion states is even if the fetus is human, we want to…
/r/MensRights01/09/21 11:18 PM
-2

I respect the position. I'm not sure that it makes abortion illegal though. Maybe it's the way daily mail reports and if somebody has additional information, please contribute to the discussion. Nased on what they have written, people can still continue to have abortion since it's civil and not criminal, if no one obkects, then no harm no foul. Now in reality it may effectively ban abortion since I'm certain the supporters fully expect anti-abortion protestors to sue clinics. Hypothetically thou…
/r/MensRights01/09/21 11:09 PM
0

Dude, what are you on? Until they figure out how to grow babies in test tubes, the situation can never be equal But we can surely mitigate that by equalizing things in law. "Adoption doesn’t take away from the personal sacrifice and medical risk/trauma of growing a child for 9 months and then giving birth." Unless of course the disadvantage is toward women then you're against equalizing. "You can support ‘legal abortion’ for men without condoning this barbaric bill." Why should better be the ene…
/r/MensRights01/09/21 11:02 PM
3

I think most or at least a substantial amount of her contributions go to "woke" causes.
/r/MensRights27/08/21 02:56 AM
-2

Yeah, they need to cut those penises in Africa. /S. That's what the gates foundation does.
/r/MensRights27/08/21 02:54 AM
5

When the military mostly folded, I saw a lot of comments like Afghanistan's men need to stand and fight. I get that they were soldiers and agree their MILITATY needed to stand and fight. I'm a bit irritated though that many of these commenters would also suggest that consent can be withdrawn at any time. A BDSM encounter gone wrong is rape because no one would consent to that, but soldiers have to consent to being killed and that consent is irrevocable. From what I understand, the Taliban didn't…
/r/MensRights19/08/21 11:06 PM
0

I was under that belief initially. That's why the initial things I've read suggested that the Taliban did not like Al Qaeda, but at that time needed them so a Taliban regeme would not be receptive to an organization comprised of diverse ethnicities. Now, I've read that the Taliban is comprised mostly of Pashtun, but then there are other ethnicities so now I take it that they'd be sympathetic to ethnically diverse terrorist organizations. I suspect that politics has infiltrated way too much into …
/r/MensRights19/08/21 09:52 PM
3

They are brave so why weren't they in the military where it would have done more good? I might be old and it's the young's philosophy to let the sh*t hit the fan and then clean it up, but logic dictates you would prevent especially if you're supposedly going most severely affected.
/r/MensRights19/08/21 08:31 PM
4

So why didn't they fight, which is my point?
/r/MensRights19/08/21 08:27 PM
1

I don't think they put women on a pedistal, but they certainly do have women supporters. I remember a story were a woman married (I believe an ISIS) fighter because they took over and it gave her heightened social standing. During WW2 if I remember correctly, there were women in occupied territories who married Nazi soldiers. It's possible some have made the decision that it's better to rule in Hell.
/r/MensRights19/08/21 08:26 PM
4

Who said they were privileged under the Taliban except for you? Most have suggested they had the most to lose under the Taliban so why were they the least likely to fight?
/r/MensRights19/08/21 08:19 PM
5

TL/DR men rape because they're evil. Women rape because they're "damaged" usually by a man or mentally ill. Having lived 53, I disagree there are no female a$$holes who won't take advantage of a situation or power imbalance for sexual satisfaction.
/r/MensRights18/08/21 04:19 PM
13

Gender segregated gyms and "ladies" nights should be illegal under anti-discrimination laws in Illinois, but the courts "carved out" an exception.
/r/MensRights18/08/21 04:01 PM
9

I didn't see OP as having a competition. It seems to me that OP was pointing out a deliberate obfuscation of the facts in an attempot to push a sexist, anti-male, agenda. The facts pointed out are not for competition, but for proof.
/r/MensRights18/08/21 07:30 AM
11

But weren't men getting beaten for not having long enough beards? As far as rape, look up bacha bazi. I'm guessing that you'll find fewer articles in the past 5 years showing concern for the young boys being raped than you'll see in the last couple weeks concerned that women in Afghamistan might be raped.
/r/MensRights18/08/21 05:02 AM
1

Why no criminal charges? She lied to investigators.
/r/MensRights17/08/21 11:22 PM
6

I guess if it was just one, but https://www.foxnews.com/us/five-high-school-mean-girls-targeted-boy-with-false-accusations-of-sexual-assault-lawsuit-claims There was another guy too. He was accused by like 13 girls. They found out 3 were conspiring against him. I don't know what happened to the other 10 and don't remember his name. Maybe some one remembers.
/r/MensRights11/08/21 09:13 PM
6

And I've never heard anyone say don't worry about getting hit by lightning because it's so rare. They always say don't stay under trees, etc.
/r/MensRights11/08/21 09:09 PM
5

Kind of how I view teaching CRT. They can't teach black and brown students reading, writing, and math so they teach the students it's not their (the "educators") or the students (or parental engagement) fault. It's society's fault.
/r/MensRights11/08/21 02:03 AM
1

Well, men are the food producers. They grow it. Tthey kill it. Tthey process it. They haul it. There's probably a bunch of other aspects to the food production chain that are dominated by men which I didn't mention too. Why would you want to starve your food producers in a time of famine?
/r/MensRights08/08/21 09:26 PM
1

Or Clinton.
/r/MensRights07/08/21 03:16 AM
1

In Michigan a couple years ago, there was a fight to allow men to rebutt the previously unrebuttable presumption of paternity within a marriage. NOW argued in favor of keeping the law. There was basically a who's who of organizations against it. The law was amended. Research the Huggies dad test. Research the all women wonder woman screening. Research father's rights. Research mark perry and national coalition for men. Research movember. A couple years boys were given the jab. I'm really unsure …
/r/MensRights05/08/21 07:05 PM
1

As long as you disgard testimony as insufficient in every other case, otherwise we're setting up a different standard for sex crime that's higher than for every other crime. That's the same thing feminists do, but in reverse. IDK that I'm willing to completely rule out eye witness testimony. The standard is beyond reasonable doubt. Not beyond ANY doubt. Is it reasonable to believe 100 people are making something up? As far Cuomo is concerned thought, they actually have memos where they discuss d…
/r/MensRights05/08/21 02:52 PM
1

If she gets rejected, the bonus is it sets Biden back in dismantling what Devo's did. I'm sure that's still his intention and his next nominee will try the same, but will have 8 months less to do it.
/r/MensRights05/08/21 02:30 PM
5

Apparently the roles were reversed many times. This seems to be the school's MO when it comes to complaints of sexual assaults.
/r/MensRights04/08/21 02:39 AM
2

That's why they launched the media campaign. They have no legal argument so they're strong arming them into it.
/r/MensRights03/08/21 03:39 PM
1

Except the judge already explained the ruling. At this point it's no longer misinformed. It's I want the money AND all the perks and security we have.
/r/MensRights03/08/21 03:35 PM
1

Don't mean to be critical, but based on those stats, men have a 133 percent greater chance of being arrested. 2.33 men are arrested for every woman (7/3). 2.33 - 1 is 1.33.
/r/MensRights03/08/21 03:22 PM
19

After her Asian eyes tweet, you'd think she would have been kicked off the team #WomensPrivilege.
/r/MensRights02/08/21 05:50 PM
6

No, but you can sue them for treating users differently based on sex or sexual orientation. I've never been on Bumble so can't say that they have an LGBTQ section, but based on the suit saying men interested in women, I suspect gay men have no problems messaging men first and lesbian women don't have the "luxury" of not getting messages from women they're not interested in.
/r/MensRights01/08/21 10:52 PM
18

If illegal discrimination is advertised, it doesn't make it legal. If you can't run a dating site legally, run something else. There's nothing that stops women from messaging first on any dating site I'm aware of.
/r/MensRights01/08/21 10:47 PM
19

"They appeared at Portsmouth Magistrates Court today alongside a third 19year-old, Fiona Hoyle, who is charged with affray and assault occasioning actual bodily harm on a woman." It seems that maybe his girlfriend took affront to it. I wonder if that's why it was even charged. At least in the U. S. DAs are know to throw every charge at a person. They then plead out the other charges to get an easy win.
/r/MensRights30/07/21 11:07 PM
3

Are you statistically the gender less likely to physically and sexually abuse those children? Probably, but he's definitely the gender lstatistically least likely to kill his child. "Are you statistically the gender less likely to abandon those children? " I'm guessing yes on this too. He's certainly the gender sdtatistically less likely to put his child up for adoption and / or leave the child in a dumpster when it's newly born.
/r/MensRights29/07/21 03:13 AM
3

No, it's a boon to #MeToo. If #MeToo is about increasing prosecutions as they claim, holding prosecutors to deals that they cut increases the rate of prosecution. Why hold Cosby to a higher standard of justice than any one else? There are 1,000s maybe 100,000s of people who cut deals with prosecutors in murder cases, racjeteering cases, etc. for reduced sentences or outright immunity for turning state's evidence at least a few were out right lies. Shouldn't prosecutors go back and charge them or…
/r/MensRights28/07/21 07:29 AM
3

Victim blaming is never appropriate unless the victim is male. /S
/r/MensRights26/07/21 01:08 PM
1

You don't know how people espousing discrimination is discrimination?
/r/MensRights26/07/21 01:01 PM
65

"'America's daughters shouldn't be drafted against their will': Conservatives blast proposal that would require women to register for the military draft alongside men" It probably went against the messaging to point out that Warren is a feminist.
/r/MensRights25/07/21 04:58 PM
2

FYI, a lot of the women's shelters have to accept male victims because they accept federal money. I believe it's under Title Vll, but it might be Title lX. It's a bigger issue than it needs to be because men aren't filing complaints while women file complaints over exercise equipment at NCAA division one basketball tournament. Some women's shelters will provide hotel vouchers for male victims. That's still a violation of the law and also encourages those shelters to turn male victims away. Not h…
/r/MensRights24/07/21 03:59 PM
0

Would these be the same women who demand abortion rights based on the right to privacy saying it's no big deal that men are required to tell the government where they live?
/r/MensRights21/07/21 02:23 AM
1

Because it only affects men. When it also affects women, it might get repealed.
/r/MensRights21/07/21 02:15 AM
1

From what I remember the U.S. doesn't repopulate through child birth anyway. Population would drop if it wasn't for immigrants.
/r/MensRights21/07/21 02:14 AM
3

It's not two wrongs because for every woman who gets drafted there's a man who is not. Same amount of misery. It's just shared.
/r/MensRights21/07/21 02:09 AM
1

Custody and child support are separate things. You are portraying it that fathers are unwilling to be present in their kids life - while true for some many are denied this when they want to while still being on the hook financially. It's certainly possible that more men would step up and be fathers if the financial obligation was removed or mitigated.
/r/MensRights18/07/21 09:24 PM
1

The same self interest that doesn't want people reproducing if they aren't capable of making a good product. We just do not want their genes to exist. It's not genetic unless you advocate for mandatory aborting of fetuses that have abnormalities. You were a lot closer to accurate when you mentioned 2 parent families. The reason we have many of the things I've stated is because most people believe that the state has an obligation to provide for those who can't provide for themselves. Is it really…
/r/MensRights18/07/21 09:19 PM
1

fathers need to step up and not just pay for, but also help raise the kids they make. So why then should we be for the paper abortion? Shouldn't we be pushing marriage? have a child, narry the mom then only men who impregnate a woman gets to be a slave. Didn't we try that and reject it?
/r/MensRights18/07/21 09:04 PM
1

I'm not sure that we should, but that argument has been made on this sub. Now if you want to examine the argument, it doesn't make sense to look at things where we disagree. In cases where we agree, one might argue it's better to join forces. Others may argue that it would be best to work independently. The big question would be what about if you're in the middle? I present this as a could be in the middle situation you can use as a test. MRAs push for paper abortions. A handfull of feminists ar…
/r/MensRights18/07/21 08:58 PM
1

That's true and untrue depending on the messaging. Who wants to eliminate public school? Who wants to eliminate SNAP? Who wants to eliminate section 8? We could go further. Who wants to eliminate bankruptcy? Why should any one get hurt because of some one else's irresponsability? Usually it comes down to self interest and often times self interest right now. I know a few people who complianed about unemployment until they needed it and then they thought having to document their hunt for work was…
/r/MensRights18/07/21 07:09 PM
5

A lot of states in the U.S. have human rights laws that include advertisements that would make a member of a protected class believe they are unwelcome in a business establishment serving the public. That's why that women's lonely wonder woman showing ran a foul of the law. Simply advertising it as women's only made it illegal.
/r/MensRights17/07/21 04:20 PM
1

So what's the NFL doing about it or do they only care when players are perpetrators?
/r/MensRights17/07/21 01:43 AM
3

And female fetuses are being aborted by women by women by women la la la la la.
/r/MensRights17/07/21 01:38 AM
3

Yes because it was made illegal. Some people will follow the law the because it's the law. Dowry becomes less socially acceptable over time. Same thing with banning mgm. Infant male circumcision becomes less socially acceptable if it becomes illegal.
/r/MensRights16/07/21 11:06 PM
3

Paying one is also illegal. The point is issues negatively affecting women will be addressed by government like banning dowry or fgm. When something becomes illegal over time social acceptance will decline. Some people won't because it's illegal, thereby setting up a new precedent / cultural norm within their own family.
/r/MensRights16/07/21 11:03 PM
8

Dowry was made illegal in India in 1961 as well. Weren't men being drafted and sent out to war at about that time in the U.S. and probably in Southeast Asia as well. It makes for an iinteresting comparussin. While society at large / government creat laws to protect women / girls from indiciduals who may see tham as disposable, society at large / government create and enforce laws that make men disposable.
/r/MensRights16/07/21 06:27 PM
3

Maybe, but wouldn't feminists have reversed it? Granted they're not noted for logic, but if cherry picked wouldn't it be, girls do better when there is more equality? Might still be garbage. Not sure it's feminist.
/r/MensRights16/07/21 05:17 PM
3

If she forced to be in the military than maybe you or some other guy won't be forced to. They're going to draft women along with men not after men have all been drafted.
/r/MensRights15/07/21 11:44 PM
1

If it's just the battlefield, why shouldn't they draft women to fill all other positions? That's close to what Israel does. They draft women to free up men for front line combat. Still not equitable, but it's a little more than just conscripting men.
/r/MensRights15/07/21 11:42 PM
3

Being a much larger proportion made it right then?
/r/MensRights15/07/21 11:37 PM
1

That's essentially your point though. You wouldn't be surprised if there was anti-male sentiment because some did things to some women. Why would it become illegitimate because the genders are reversed. It's not like men aren't raped or abused by women even if some governments refuse to acknowledge it.
/r/MensRights15/07/21 11:12 PM
1

Voluntary female army has actual physical tests they have to pass to join, Conscription in this case is mandatory military service for ALL males. War time necessity has nothing to do with it. Why wouldn't they be able to est women? Women found unfit to serve as men unfit to serve would simply not serve.
/r/MensRights15/07/21 08:22 PM
1

So how do those issues go away simply because a woman volunteers?
/r/MensRights15/07/21 05:25 PM
2

The southern states didn't support ending slavery either, didn't make ending slavery wrong.
/r/MensRights15/07/21 05:24 PM
2

But why stop there if people are simply tools of the state? Technically, they're replacing the male population. In your estimation then it should be OK to abort say 20 percent of female fetuses. It speeds up the re-impregnation since women would have to have 3 or 4 kids anyway. I suspect you don't that are should be tools of the state. I suspect you believe MEN should be tools of state. That's another issue.
/r/MensRights15/07/21 05:20 PM
3

Might be logical if women were actually banned, but they serve if they choose to. That'd what makes it illogical as well as unfair.
/r/MensRights15/07/21 05:11 PM
2

Why let them serve voluntarily then?
/r/MensRights15/07/21 05:08 PM
3

I doubt that. My feminist niece stayed in south Korea with a south Korean family for like 6 months. She loved it there and wants to move there. She said it's a lot different how women are treated there and I'm pretty sure she spends her day looking for micro aggressions.
/r/MensRights15/07/21 04:07 PM
2

So basically if I was ever mistreated by a woman or any man for that matter, I'm completely justified if I treat all women like shit?
/r/MensRights15/07/21 03:39 PM
4

So women should be conscripted into replenishing the population?
/r/MensRights14/07/21 11:03 PM
0

Most really old people are women. That's where the "excess" women are. So you think we should work people until they die?
/r/MensRights14/07/21 09:56 PM
1

The only minimization of rape there is is female perpetrated rape. Not recognizing non-consensual envelopment as rape is the only rape culture there is.
/r/MensRights14/07/21 09:51 PM
25

I would rather the woman be forced to be there instead of me. Drafting women reduces the reliance on men.
/r/MensRights14/07/21 06:36 PM
1

You claim you don't know how to define it, but insist you know what the definition is. It makes no sense just like CRT. You continue to rant and insist you're right while already admitting you don't know how to define it. Luckily for me and unfortunately for you, anyone who comes by can see what was written.
/r/MensRights14/07/21 04:56 PM
5

So your approach of implying the male victims of the Holocaust somehow deserved it is a better approach?
/r/MensRights14/07/21 02:03 AM
10

Except he's already been and had his reputation tarnished. She identity is shielded. It seems only one is effectively innocent until proven guilty. Shouldn't it be both?
/r/MensRights14/07/21 01:50 AM
0

Because it's not the topic of this conversation. Luckily you have no credibility to lose.
/r/MensRights13/07/21 11:13 PM
2

Yes you attacking me, and not providing evidence to your claim is clearly working for you... No, I questioning how you would know that any ones definition is incorrect when you've admitted that you don't know what the correct definition is. That's not evasion. "So back to the original point, can you actually define CRT" I've already don'e that, which as a poster previously pointed out, the proponents of CRT can't and or won't. It seems their definition changes depending on what is advantageous a…
/r/MensRights13/07/21 11:11 PM
6

Then why is he being publicly identified and she isn't? There's a huge difference. He's already been punished guilty or not and has his reputation tarnished. Nothing has happened to her. She even has her identity protected.
/r/MensRights13/07/21 11:02 PM
2

Non-sequentor agaiin or outright lie. You claimed no person on this forun knew so you either don't know, you aren't a person, you aren't on this forum, and / or you're lying. You kying is not mutually exclusive to any of the prior except for maybe not being a person depending on whether non-people can lie. BTW calling out BS or a lie isn't evasion, but since you already lied once, why should I expect you not to again.
/r/MensRights13/07/21 10:25 PM
2

And you would know that because? Are you not a person? Are you not on this forum or are you a liar?
/r/MensRights13/07/21 09:35 PM
1

"Can a single person here define CRT." How would you know that's a no unless you can define it? Are you not a person? Are you not on this forum or are we imaging your comments? Essentially a liar.
/r/MensRights13/07/21 09:30 PM
2

He's not in jail is he? Neither is she. "he can sue for wrongful termination" percisely what I've advocated based on the information I have althought he shouldn't have to if he's innocent, which based on how I see the publicly disclosed evidence, seems more likely than not. "The reality is, at-will employment is a bitch." The reality is he's under contract, both individually and through collective bargaining. In these contracts there's usually a catch all clause for actions detrimental to the te…
/r/MensRights13/07/21 09:18 PM
21

If there was an investigation, it's even worse because they're claiming that he did in fact abuse her. It makes them more liable than less. "I'm not calling her a false accuser until the law convicts her of being a false accuser." Of course, it's OK for him to be guilty and even punished without a conviction.
/r/MensRights13/07/21 07:58 PM
3

"You can advocate for men rights as there is some need for advocacy. But so do women, they have issues too, just different ones obviously." So why is forcing things to be gender buetral preventing people from advocating for women? Look at my comment above because it forces them to advocate for men as well. That's the underlying issue for people who oppose this. They can no longer help women without helping men. They also know that deep down they would rather have women suffer than to help men.
/r/MensRights13/07/21 07:53 PM
3

Once no one is villified on the basis of gender (or race), when you elevate one you have to elevate all because no there is no privilege argument to ignore some one's plight. I think the ypset you see from some is because they know that with the passage of laws that require things be gender nuetral they can no longer help women without helping men and when it comes to feminists they would rather have women suffer than help men.
/r/MensRights13/07/21 07:50 PM
2

It was, but they expanded it to include gender so it effectively also cancels feminism. I don't know if it was intentional, but I think it's a win.
/r/MensRights13/07/21 05:24 PM
8

CRT is the BS theory that history isn't really history so they go back to make everything about race. They claim race is just a social construct. Duh, but that's way too simplistic and ignores history and science. Families are also "social constructs", but because children can't fend for themselves was also "necessary". Certainly there could be alternative "it takes a village", but we would have to get there first. When people fought for resources, thyey knew there was strength in numbers. Of co…
/r/MensRights13/07/21 01:25 PM
17

Bit remember the gender life expectancy gap is only due to biological differences between men and women. It has nothing to do with boys / men not getting the HPV vaccine girls were allowed to get, not having any "men's health" otems mandated in the Affordable Care Act, and now getting a less effective covid jab.
/r/MensRights12/07/21 09:58 PM
1

I was like 120 pounds when I started weight lifting too. I couldn't put on any weight until I starting taking dietary suppliments (I think it was weight gainer 2000, but that was almost 40 years ago). I went to about 170. The cool thing about being only 5' 7" is 15" biceps look like a decent size.
/r/MensRights11/07/21 11:34 AM
2

The funniest incels are the feminist ones. Women don't have sex with door mats.
/r/MensRights11/07/21 11:26 AM
1

What shoe doesn't fit the other foot?
/r/MensRights11/07/21 11:20 AM
1

Who's denying women's experience? We're just writing on our experience so how is that hurting women? Oh yeah, it's that feminist women are disempowered unless they can abuse and rape men at will. Incel now means men who reject women's sexual advances / company. That sound more like volcel to me, but only when she's creepy.
/r/MensRights11/07/21 11:20 AM
3

Maybe its a difference in manners from the area we live. There was a woman on GMP who told us she was never harassed. She lived in a small town though and everyone knew everybody. I've also met women from Eastern Europe who are walking, perpetual, boners. She's just constantly flirting all the time with basically every guy she meets. I wouldn't discount area, but if you don't want to be down voted, you might want to specify that it doesn't excuse it unless you think it does, then I'll probably d…
/r/MensRights10/07/21 08:37 PM
2

Mary koss argued men couldn't be raped. I Israel the feminist movement fought against changing the law to allow men to accuse women of rape. On the other hand during the feminist rape is rape campaign that mislabeling rape is problematic because it won't be taken as seriously. Then they fought for a definition that excluded rape by envelopment.
/r/MensRights10/07/21 04:46 PM
1

It's clear you're with nothing to offer people IRL so you come to have a semblance of one. You're welcome.
/r/MensRights10/07/21 04:38 PM
2

You think hitting some one and killing them is (can be) an honest mistake? You think leaving a child with abusive parents is (can be) an honest mistake? I fear for the people in your life.
/r/MensRights10/07/21 04:31 PM
2

You think hitting some one and killing them is (can be) an honest mistake? You think leaving a child with abusive parents is (can be) an honest mistake? I fear for the people in your life.
/r/MensRights10/07/21 04:30 PM
6

Worse than that. Her excuse was two guys broke up with her so she felt "down". Talk about it being dangerous for men to say no to a woman.
/r/MensRights10/07/21 04:06 PM
2

I'm not sure they're even talking about the victim. They might be talking about her friend who mailed the letter for her. Why he thought it was a "harmless" request when he was told she was setting a guy up is unfathomable.
/r/MensRights10/07/21 04:03 PM
2

totally agree I think labor rights have always been on the same side as men's rights for the most part. That's one of the things that got me about the whole women in the locker room thing. Any one who supported worker's rights should have opposed that. SCOTUS ruled that teams could either close the locker room to all reporters or they could open it to all reporters. SCOTUS only looked at things from the perspective of the owners, who didn't have a "privacy" concern and the reporters. They didn't…
/r/MensRights10/07/21 07:29 AM
3

It was a defauly judgement. She lost because she chose not to answer it. I good he sued her if she's lying rather than just mistaken, but it's not like the ruling sets a precedent or something.
/r/MensRights10/07/21 07:18 AM
8

I wouldn't be surprised if one mentioned the number of commits I have on my GitHub... I guess the bright side would be they don't have to ask you what you do for a living or where you worked. That always got me where right off the bat they wanted to figure out how much you made.
/r/MensRights09/07/21 07:50 PM
26

I've never walked into a women's room. I always pause to double check I'm going into the right one. Men go to prison when they go into the wrong one. I doubt people would even consider that it might be a mistake.
/r/MensRights09/07/21 07:16 PM
21

I used to kick box so had a lot of lean muscle when I was young. I understand what you're saying. I'm still not sure how to take this. I go to get a blood test. I'm terrified of needles. I don't know if the nurse realized, but she asked me if I played football. I took that as your a muscular guy, why are you acting like a b*tch? I don't know that's exactly creepy, but it's an attitude that can lead to creepy. It that you're a big guy or a macho guy so I should be able to do anything to you since…
/r/MensRights09/07/21 07:14 PM
15

This makes it seem as if it's wrong There are people who already think it's wrong. "but you ask this as a retaliation to women saying things men do that make them uncomfortable." Hopefully people would remember how they felt when people did things that made them feel uncomfortable. Hopefully you don't get that well he's a man and should be able to defend himself if things got worse. Hopefully they'd realize that he shouldn't have to defend himself or wait until things get worse and they just wou…
/r/MensRights09/07/21 06:57 PM
11

I remember that when I was young and working out. Doesn't happen anymore, but unlike feminists, I don't miss the things I don't like.
/r/MensRights09/07/21 06:48 PM
8

When women are afraid they start hovering in your "orbit" or on very rare occasions (it only happened once) will hide behind you and "snuggle" / "caress" / touch your back or shoulders. If we're friends or related, I don't care, but it happems with strangers sometimes once with a woman I didn't even like. Sometimes they'll just strike up a conversation. We went to high school together and went to the same college. We didn't like each other in high school anyway we went to the same college. We bo…
/r/MensRights09/07/21 06:44 PM
2

If it is, shouldn't we be creating boys poetry / spelling bee contests / etc? We have separate athletic teams for girls because boys have an advantage in that area.
/r/MensRights09/07/21 06:23 PM
3

I'm not sure it's survivor bias as much as misandry. I suspect that if there was a mudslide that buried a village and the men were able to evacuate because they were working in fields or were faster, we'd hear about the 1,000 women who were killed rather than the 1,000 men now homeless.
/r/MensRights09/07/21 06:20 PM
25

Poking / patting you on the stomach. It's only happened to me a couple times, but I mentioned it to a guy who's over 300 lbs once and he told me the "humiliate the fat guy" happened to him a few times.
/r/MensRights09/07/21 05:36 PM
33

Thinking they're the center of the universe. Once I was looking at something behind a woman, she tuens to her friend and asks her why I hadn't made a move on her yet? Short answer was because I wasn't interested.
/r/MensRights09/07/21 04:37 PM
31

Instead of asking you out, saying that you should take them someplace.
/r/MensRights09/07/21 04:34 PM
59

Just pop into the men's room when they feel like it. This hs happened at least half a dozen times in my lifetime. The kicker was probably at this club where there was a pay phone between the men's and women's restroom. There was a woman using the phone when I walked into the men's room. While relieving myself at the urinal, she decides to pop her head in and ask if I had a pen. EDIT: Sorry, I think it's a tie. It's tied with the time I was talking to my female boss. I turned into the men's room …
/r/MensRights09/07/21 04:31 PM
67

Straightening my clothes without me asking or consenting. This has always been women. It's usually women I'm acquainted with, but aren't particularly close to, however, I've had women unilaterally decide to "adjust" things for me when I've gone clothes shopping.
/r/MensRights09/07/21 04:29 PM
40

I'll start out. Non-consensual, supposedly platonic, touching. It's almost exclusively women who've done this. I'm saying almost because I want to hedge my bets incase I've forgotten a time or two when a man has done this. It's usually in retail, but there was a waitress who was rubbing my back. When a friend of mine went bald, there was a waitress who rubbed his head.
/r/MensRights09/07/21 04:26 PM
2

No , that's what she claims he said. It could be fabricated.
/r/MensRights09/07/21 07:02 AM
4

Because it hasn't stopped you from raping.
/r/MensRights09/07/21 06:58 AM
5

No. Is that you Jemma Beale?
/r/MensRights09/07/21 06:56 AM
4

Dude got suspended without due process. That's no consequences? Men's rights mean we stand for due process, but if we're going to eliminate due process, it should be eliminated for everyone. If no one can make an honest mistake, we should remove criminal intent requirement.
/r/MensRights09/07/21 06:51 AM
3

She literally asked him to leave a hand print on her after she passes out. Boxers tend to not agree to that let alone ask for it.
/r/MensRights08/07/21 02:42 PM
22

I learned that as long as I claim I have a concussion, it must be true even if there's No medical reason or evidence for it.
/r/MensRights08/07/21 02:57 AM
105

I don't mind feminists here as long as there here for honest discussion. I've seen some that flat out repeat things that are factually incorrect.
/r/MensRights08/07/21 02:44 AM
9

My initial feeling is this was unfortunate / accidental. The texts don't support her claim nor does the medical evidence in the article. I'm leaning toward false now.
/r/MensRights08/07/21 02:38 AM
18

Today I learned asking someone to do something for your sexually pleasure isn't consenting to the act.
/r/MensRights08/07/21 02:27 AM
10

Most likely from slaps. You don't think some one can slap hard enough to leave a bruise?
/r/MensRights08/07/21 12:50 AM
13

That's what she complained about, but that's not what they found. It would be las if some one was doing a diagnostic of you and there was a section heading for intelligence and under that it said utter moron. It doesn't mean toy're intelligent. It means when measuring your intelligence, you've been found to be an utter moron.
/r/MensRights08/07/21 12:49 AM
6

In a lot of the BDSM videos they do that. They record the person agreeing to it at the beginning or sometimes it shows up at the end. There was one with Charlie Chase were she said no anal. The guy was irritated, but he respected it.
/r/MensRights08/07/21 12:44 AM
8

He didn't punch her. Dude is huge compared to her. If he punched her, she would have had fractures. The medical report says she didn't. He hit her as she asked him to. I'm pretty sure since she has no fractures, she probably lying about getting punched as she was lying about not consenting to being choked out.
/r/MensRights08/07/21 12:40 AM
13

If she had one, but the medical report she produced says she didn't.
/r/MensRights08/07/21 12:36 AM
9

She told him to leave a hand print on her ass when she passed out. Should all surgeons be in prison now for performing surgeries on unconscious patients who couldn't consent or should we accept their prior consent? She said put her out then leave a hand print on her ass.
/r/MensRights08/07/21 12:16 AM
13

"Brain: NO EVIDENCE OF acute intercranial hemorrhage, mass effect, or evidencce of intercranial endema. Bones / Joints: Unremarkable no acute fracture" Except there were no evidence of it. That what it says in the medical report. There wasn't even an "acute" fracture. I'm guessing that if there was any fracture, they would have mentioned it. I suspect they're hedging their bets with acute for legal reasons.
/r/MensRights08/07/21 12:11 AM
20

Actually the medical repoort says. "Brain: NO EVIDENCE OF acute intercranial hemorrhage, mass effect, or evidencce of intercranial endema. Bones / Joints: Unremarkable no acute fracture" So, are you incapable of reading and don't understand what that NO means at the beginning of the diagnosis or are you deliberately lying because the mdical diagnosis doesn't even support her?
/r/MensRights07/07/21 11:51 PM
13

Where? It actually say there is no evidence of it. That pesky 2 letter word at the beginning of the medical report really puts things in context. EDIT: I said it was inconclusive to give her the benefit of the doubt. The medial report actually says there's not much wrong with her.
/r/MensRights07/07/21 11:39 PM
11

She assumed a risk when she asked to get hit by a professional athlete. Professional athletes don't agree to it either. Should we criminally charge every athlete who injured another athlete. People don't agree to die during surgeries, should we prosecute every one in the operating room?
/r/MensRights07/07/21 11:18 PM
12

That's an assumption of risk when you ask a huge, professional, athlete to hit you.
/r/MensRights07/07/21 11:10 PM
8

That's inconclusive.
/r/MensRights07/07/21 11:08 PM
14

When she asks him to do it again and then meets him. That's a clear indication she consented.
/r/MensRights07/07/21 10:53 PM
15

Then that would explain, right? If you ask some one to hit you especial a large professional athlete, your chances of getting black eyes are a lot bigger than if you didn't ask some one to hit you.
/r/MensRights07/07/21 10:49 PM
13

She absolutely consented to the second. That's what means when you ASK someone to do it again.
/r/MensRights07/07/21 10:42 PM
20

Did Bauer ask her to hit him for his sexual gratification?
/r/MensRights07/07/21 10:39 PM
12

Did she not assume a risk when she asked a professional athlete to hit her?
/r/MensRights07/07/21 10:36 PM
17

She's complaining about being strangled, but she wanted to be choked out. She expect him to slap the "sleeper hold" on her? If he did it by choking her last time, what would make her think he'd do it differently this time especially since she didn:t complain about it. If she lied about not consenting to that, why should we believe she isn't lying about not consenting to Everything else? Edit: she literally ask to leave leave a hand print on her when she was out. I'm on my phone so I can't copy a…
/r/MensRights07/07/21 10:07 PM
9

His friend, John Fredrickson, was also sentenced to 18 months. So she actually "ruined" the lives of 3 men.
/r/MensRights04/07/21 07:46 PM
12

states never ever prosecute a woman just for raping a man There have been a few women who were charged with raping a man. Most plead guilty to attempted rape. The only one I know convicted is https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/10255926/woman-forced-man-to-have-sex-machete/ She still was charged along with other crimes as you noted. "But your link is to an article on a state law (NY) not the FBI's UCR?" Yes, but that's also the point. The author invokes the rape is rape campaign and encourages NY to e…
/r/MensRights04/07/21 06:19 PM
26

90% of men are raped by women. The definition erases 90% of male victims and over 90% of female rapists. They're supposed to get points for protecting only 90+% of female rapists instead of all of them?
/r/MensRights04/07/21 05:53 PM
1

I know why they do it. I don't understand why they draw a distinction between a "willing" rape victim and an "unwilling" rape victim. The only reason I can see is to protect the narrative. They classify most male victims of female perpetrators as "willing" (rape) and most female victims of male perpetrators as "unwilling" (legitemate rape). There was a controversy one time about "legitemate" rape or rape rape. It was called out by the MSM yet this let's create distinctions among rapes gets a pas…
/r/MensRights04/07/21 05:28 PM
1

Correct so my issue is why bother to draw a distinction and claim some instances are rape, but somewhat less than rape? I suspect that it's because most of the time these distinctions are made it's when the perpetrator is an adult female and the victim is a male. I feel it's because women abusing men / boys goes against the women are wonderful narrative and the world would be better off if women were in charge. IMO it's just the continuation of the feminist narrative that men can't really be rap…
/r/MensRights04/07/21 04:35 PM
3

If 90% of feminbists are the crazy, misandrist, radical, ones; the movement is man hating, anti-men. I think it's U.N. Women that puts out the report. They check how women are faring in the world and rate countries. The issue is in the report any category where women have an advantage is counted as absolute equality. It's not counted as men are disadvantaged. It's not a fronge group and yet they have no problem with 100% of college students being women. 100% of politicians being women. 100% of t…
/r/MensRights04/07/21 01:39 AM
1

OK, what changed? The deposition was out there when this was origianlly discussed on this sub a few years ago. If I remember correctly, the over whelming sentiment on this sub was he was innocent unless found guilty at a fair trial. It wasn't he admitted to it under oath. If that's true now. It was true then because the deposition has been around since then. I wasn't one of them. I believed he was guilty, but also believe in due process and the presumption of innocence so I decided to remain sil…
/r/MensRights01/07/21 01:11 AM
1

I wonder how exactly they count pornography as "sexual abuse". From what I understand, there was an issue where aid workers were demanding refugees pose nude so they could take pictures of them on a cell phone.
/r/MensRights30/06/21 06:56 PM
20

That was something I was wondering about and alluded to. This was an outlier case which was just extreme. Multiple victims, multiple occasions, handing out drugs, and one of them was 12. That's why I'm not ready to say the courts are finally taking this seriously. Still, at least in this case there was no p*ssy pass.
/r/MensRights30/06/21 06:29 PM
-1

That's not the question. I just wanted to give you the opportunity to show you weren't being disingenuous. We already knew that you were. The next time you want to say something irrelevant to the discussion, but hope people will just assume that it is, I suggest you don't pick the person who'll call you on it.
/r/MensRights27/06/21 09:36 PM
-2

So, you claimed I said something g that I didn't say because? No, I wanted to get a clarification. That's why I asked a question. You're accusing me of something I didn't do. "I absolutely answered the question. " No, answering the question is not saying that you never stated that. Answering the question is answering the question, but that';s fine I'll rephrase. How was it determined that women base their dating decisions on a man physical appearance? What weight do they place? If you can answer…
/r/MensRights27/06/21 07:02 PM
1

Hang in there. I have a friend. Let's just say that she's not conventionally attractive. She's about 20 years younger than I. She had hit on a friend of mine who was closer to her age range. He's about 5 - 7 years older. She was devistated when he got married. Then she started to hit on me. It got so bad that she told me that she was afraid she'd never be with a man. I would have had sex with her not because I found her attractive enough to have sex with, but because I cared for her and she was …
/r/MensRights27/06/21 06:44 PM
-1

Actually, studies have found that women are actually at a huge disadvantage when dating in college. Most people might believe it's the huge gender imbalance in college, but apparently not some who have posted here. Silly me I thought I got into college because of my scores. It must've been because I was hot since I had a few female classmates hit on me.
/r/MensRights27/06/21 06:13 PM
-4

You didn't, and you never answered the question how do you know that women based their dating decisions primarily on how a man looks? I'll wait for the answer.
/r/MensRights27/06/21 06:06 PM
1

"Basically the male rat would be exhausted from sex, but when introduced to new partners, go at it again with renewed sexual interest." I'm guessing he doesn't have to pay child support. The OK Cupid study on attractiveness that people seem to be citing rated physical atrractiveness. How did we figure out that a woman based her dating decisions either entirely or largely on physical attractiveness? Women might be finding men attractive in other ways and that might be more likely to inform their …
/r/MensRights27/06/21 06:04 PM
-5

OK, so your saying that women put a higher premium on looks than say career.
/r/MensRights27/06/21 05:26 PM
0

No, hot women are spoiled for choice. Average looking and belowe not so much. I have a bigger issue with women who in their 20s turn down guys in their 20s to date more established men in their 40s then when they reach 40 themselves get angry because the 40 year old guys they wouldn't give the time of day to 20 years earlier won't give the time of day to them now.
/r/MensRights27/06/21 04:43 PM
1

Call it a unilateral adoption then. There still is no going back unless the child decided at some they want to reconnect with their biological father, but it's not his decision or control.
/r/MensRights26/06/21 11:47 PM
1

I don't have an issue with that. I think if men have responsibilities they should rights. If they rights, they should have responsibilities. The opposite is also acceptable. If men have no rights, they should have no responsibilities.
/r/MensRights26/06/21 01:53 PM
1

I'll take that as a riff on the feminist if a fat chick wants to have sex with you, have sex with her. I'll still say have sex with who you want to have sex with (as long as it's mutual of course). Don't have sex with people you don't want to have sex with.
/r/MensRights26/06/21 01:20 PM
1

No, but that's part of the point. Companies shouldn't start creating gender or race specific beenefits. There's already or should be a sick leave policy. It should cover recovery from child birth. There shouldn't be a separate policy.
/r/MensRights25/06/21 10:25 PM
3

That was kind of a discussion I had with another feminist on GMP. He proudly proclaimed I'm against all oppression. I challenged it, but added if I got to decide what was oppression and what wasn't, I'd be against all oppression as well. It's not the situation or the power imbalance or anything "nuetral". They don't like straight, white, men so they declare them unoppressable. It's an apartheid caste system.
/r/MensRights25/06/21 10:13 PM
1

Neither are U.S. law makers although that was the excuse SCOTUS used not to consider the case.
/r/MensRights25/06/21 02:43 PM
1

Should they? Do men and women have the same tolerance / expectation and should men support women's expectations? Those are questions never asked, but I believe are pertinent. If a man believes cleaning once every months is sufficient, should he clean every 2 weeks because his partner believes that things need to be cleaned every week or should he clean once a month and his partner can clean the other three weeks?
/r/MensRights25/06/21 02:39 PM
1

Everyone should have adequate leave. I doubt there's a lot disagreement on that, but I think there's an issue created when we start suggesting that this particular malady or that particular malady should have it's own leave. For example, I'm of the opinion that maternity leave is handled in an illegal way in the U.S. It should be simply sick leave for recovery and parental leave for bonding. What ailments that perdominately affect men have their own separate leave policy in addition to regular s…
/r/MensRights25/06/21 02:22 PM
3

Now imagine for a minute that in order to secure your rights (well sorta) as a parent that you have to tell the government every person you have had sex with. Which is completely ironic in the U.S. since the right to abortion was derived from the right to privacy.
/r/MensRights25/06/21 02:06 PM
2

Theoretically those laws apply to men. Realistically they don't unless the mother died in child birth.
/r/MensRights25/06/21 09:34 AM
6

I'm not sure if she's a feminist. I read what she said on the Good Men Project forums. Her statement was something like the idea of privilege is a excuse / reason not to help. Think of it a second. If I have a population that's homeless, but I believe that men are privileged, where do the resources go? What feminists reject the idea of male privilege? How does anything you've linked refute the statement that feminists believe all men's issues are internal and they only need to overcome their tox…
/r/MensRights25/06/21 02:40 AM
6

I'm calling BS. At first I thought, well maybe he got confused when he saw some "woman kills", "Woman convicted of filing false rape", etc. articles. There's actually been a debate about that on this sub. Some argue that it has nothing to do with men's rights. Others suggest that it does. It raises awareness that false rape charges happen, women can be abusive, etc. There are huge media messaging machines that want to suggest the opposite so I tend to come down on the latter. As far as blaming f…
/r/MensRights25/06/21 01:37 AM
4

To clarify, the point of the post is as a movement we should either oppose any laws that require fathers to provide any support prior to child birth or we should support laws that give fathers veto rights in pregnancy. One or the other is wrong.
/r/MensRights24/06/21 08:40 PM
3

Women who like clean shaven men are pedophiles. There you go.
/r/MensRights18/06/21 08:02 PM
8

Agreed, I would say 24. The reason is because for FAFSA, you're not considered financially independent until 24. It's still determined by your parents income.
/r/MensRights18/06/21 04:24 PM
4

It that society is misandric and undervalues male lives. Men are more likely to kill men. That's true. Women are also more likely to kill men than they are another woman. That is also true.
/r/MensRights13/06/21 08:34 PM
3

Is there a market for pro-male marketing? From what I've read, there were a couple feminists who attacked dadvertising and Movember. Movember tends to only benefit the charity and so it's unlikjely that there is self interest involved. Dadvertising is a very small section of the men's rights movement. In fact, it's been so successful that many feminists and the MSM have tried to break it off of the men's rights movement claiming it's a moveent of it's own. Aside from that prostate cancer prevent…
/r/MensRights13/06/21 05:50 PM
3

I have to disagree. When I was on GMP, a feminist menslib type community that was MRA tolerant, there was a comment made that really clarified feminism and men's issues and has stuck with me. The comment was something like the purpose of privilege is so that they don't have to care. We see that all the time. About 90% of homeless people are men. but feminists will say men are privileged so we need to help homeless women first and many times exclusively. Men are privileged so in a famine situatio…
/r/MensRights13/06/21 04:42 PM
4

That would still make a double standard in that women can advertise their preference without being called misandrist.
/r/MensRights11/06/21 02:22 PM
14

They have women only carriages in Japan. Somebody decided to ask men if they wanted their own carriages. Like 40 percent said yes citing false sexual harassment complaints. If we accept that women should have their own areas so they can feel comfortable, then men deserve the same.
/r/MensRights11/06/21 01:04 PM
7

I thought about that, but there is a difference between I haven't met a single woman and all women.
/r/MensRights11/06/21 12:54 PM
13

No, I've never heard anyone declare it. They just go about their lives without attempting to get a girlfriend. It might be just women who feel the need to declare it.
/r/MensRights09/06/21 01:30 PM
9

They feel safer that way so let them be Then why don't they go to a women's only gym? "Why is them getting their own space pressing you so much ?" It's discriminatory. It's probably illegal. Other articles point out the issue with allowing businesses arbritarily decide to deny customers the full enjoyment of the facilities based on a protected class. Discriminatory precedents should bother any person of good will. There are other legal option as mentioned before, they can go to a women's only gy…
/r/MensRights09/06/21 07:10 AM
7

Well, why don't they just go to a women only gym? They've been held to be legal in many states. Stick to legal solutions for your "issues". Business owners should have to decide if they want to enter the niche market of women only gyms. That's a beauty of capitalism. If they're going to have men as customers, don't discriminate against them.
/r/MensRights09/06/21 04:44 AM
10

Except if you defended yourself you'd be in jail.
/r/MensRights08/06/21 11:39 PM
9

That might be the younger generation, but body disnorphia is a bigger problem for today's youth than in my generation. We worked out for utility, to be stronger (ie the 98 pound weaking ads in the back of comic books. Don't let people kick sand in your face). Now, they want to look good as a primary driver. We did too, but it was more an added bonus. There were a couple women going to the No Handle Bars gym by my house. Like the name suggested, you went there to lift weights. I would have prefer…
/r/MensRights08/06/21 07:51 PM
13

Does a clinic geared towards women hurt men in any way? If so, how? If the idea is to make it accessible in both time, availability of appointments, and distance, the amount of travel, then necssarily it would unless another clinic open to men was right next door and always had open appointments. Granted, there may be very few, but what would you do for men who only wanted to get a vaccine from another man. Hasidic Jews can't even sit next to a woman. What would you do for a man who only feels c…
/r/MensRights08/06/21 07:43 PM
3

When I was younger and working out, I had women checking me out as well. That wasn't the big issue. It was when they started "bothering" me. Getting hit on is a nusaunce, but I think women over blow the seriousness. It might be worth paying an extra $5 - 10 a month to not have to wait to use the free weights as some will undoubtable want to save money. A guy though is just as likely to be bothered by another guy asking for pointers. That's what personal trainers are for. My nephews tell me that …
/r/MensRights08/06/21 07:36 PM
1

By they do you mean that you got an opt out request for mother's day from Solovair or are you talking some other companies do it?
/r/MensRights06/06/21 10:54 PM
18

My mom lived through world war 2. She was in Japan occupied Philippines. She remembers her older brother hiding on the roof when the Japanese soldiers were going door to door looking to #killallmen. Way to "punch up", feminists. Make a "joke" about war crimes that actually happened.
/r/MensRights06/06/21 10:40 PM
0

Wouldn't that depend on the reason they sent the opt out? If I remember correctly, the cancel father's day movement didn't have anything to do with father's dying and everything to do with fathers' contributions to families being minimized.
/r/MensRights06/06/21 09:25 AM
5

There are jobs in the u.s. that women aren't allowed to do, but it's extremely limited in scope and there are jobs that men are not allowed to do as well. It's called a bona fide occupational requirement. One example would be a gentlemen's club only hiring female strippers, but it goes both ways and gender has to be a bona fide requirement.
/r/MensRights03/06/21 11:29 PM
6

That's a common argument, however, I've not found a single instance of it. Every woman I'm aware of who has recanted due to solely to conscience rather than police investigation has done regardless of the punishment. If you are correct, you would think that there would be at least one incidence of a retraction at the expiration of statutes of limitation for filing a false report / perjury etc. Edit: the closest I've found was Kathleen Webb in the Gary Dotson case. Her recanting came after statut…
/r/MensRights03/06/21 11:16 PM
4

You do realize that pointing out the double standard doesn't mean you necessarily oppose something.
/r/MensRights02/06/21 01:24 AM
1

My guess was that's what she was trying to do. She made about $55 million last year. I'm guessing most of it is endorsements. $15K fine to her is nothing. I suspect she was prepared to keep eating fines. She pulled out because tourneyments threatened to ban her not just the French Open. My guess is that would have hurt her endorsement deals. If the tourneyments don't budge, it will be interesting to see what her choice is. Will she in effect retire or will she participate in press conferences.
/r/MensRights01/06/21 09:29 PM
4

FYI If you're going to comment, you might want to try saying something that makes sense next time.
/r/MensRights01/06/21 03:10 PM
2

I wonder how many people join because they want to serve their country and how many join because they have few other options. Except for certain instances where the U.S. has been attacked and maybe not even those, I'm inclined to believe the latter.
/r/MensRights01/06/21 01:09 PM
5

There were a few. I believe Wilbur Marshall was one. The most recent one I believe was when I think it was Fox Sports who broadcast nude players in the if I remember correctly the Bengals locker room. There was an offensive lineman who wasn't talking about female reporters specifically, but reporters in the locker room in general and mentioned he's never been interviewed once in his career, but has his privacy violated anyway. The only other support they got was from the backup quarterbacks wife…
/r/MensRights01/06/21 12:26 PM
3

I heard about the depression, but chose not to mention it because I don't know enough about it. Has it been medically diagnosed and what do we know about the psychology? I have a niece who has depession and a nephew who suffered from anxiety. I'm unsure if she was diagnosed. He was. I believe Osaka claimed both. My niece still has depression. My nephew on the other hand stopped having anxiety after he got out of therapy. Amazingly when people stopped telling him he had anxiety instead of being j…
/r/MensRights01/06/21 12:17 PM
1

I supposed that's right as long as you didn't support the draft or drafting women like Hillary clinton until the landscape changed we're it became a serious possibility. That would be more like actively discussing people from donating to cancer research until your gran got it. What might have given people pause was her father was already affected by it. She mentioned daughters first. Could that indicate priority? Why not mention them together? Maybe it was some word to hit a word count or someth…
/r/MensRights05/04/21 03:27 PM
1

The point might have been that her opposition to the draft had less to do with gender equality or bodily autonomy than it has to do with being personally affected. Hillary clinton rethought her support for including women in the draft after it became a possibility.
/r/MensRights05/04/21 02:21 AM
2

First, there are men who lost student loans or were denied government jobs because they weren't registered for the draft. Why wouldn't you compensate them for loss of future earning like you would do if they filed a civil suit and won?
/r/MensRights05/04/21 01:30 AM
1

Read my first under the mods. I've seen too many word tricks that this raises a red flag. If they didn't say 8, there are 3 possibilities I see. They wanted to down play the number of women. I've seen enough of their agenda to not believe. Of they wanted to highlight male victims, they would have detailed the massacre of 250 at about the same time. Men between the ages of 18 and 50, but including them would change the gender balance of the victims of this so they used a word tricks to trick the …
/r/MensRights05/04/21 01:21 AM
2

Look at the replies.
/r/MensRights05/04/21 01:07 AM
6

If it's gender neutral, men's salaries will probably go up. If it's not, there probably will be no change. Bias in the workplace seems to till in favor of women these days.
/r/MensRights05/04/21 12:56 AM
2

I think the point is there is another option. eliminate the draft altogether, which is the better option. Draft women,which is a good option. Eliminate the draft AND address the historical inequalities, which is the best option. The author seems to be unconcerned with addressing historical discrimination.
/r/MensRights05/04/21 12:50 AM
10

One problem with affirmative consent combined with the preponderance of the evidence standard is there is no grey area. I know that was the intent, but what would finding him not responsible mean? It means it's more likely than not she CONSENTED through the ENTIRE encounter. That means she lied. IMO if one lies about someone raping them, they've created a hostile environment for that person in the same vien as somebody who raped someone. This should be a Title IX violation. From what I understan…
/r/MensRights03/04/21 08:46 PM
1

Several doesn't necessarily = 8.
/r/MensRights03/04/21 07:57 PM
1

"Eight days ago, Eritrean soldiers searching for suspected TPLF insurgents killed 13 people in Grizana, a village 50 miles south-west of Mekelle in an area where fierce fighting has taken place. The victims included three men in their 50s, several women, a 15-year-old and a two-year-old." I had an issue with this. I found it somewhat bias that they chose to high light a massacre that theoretically had more female victims in a war where 90% of those killed were men, 13 - 5 = 8. Then I looked at t…
/r/MensRights03/04/21 07:15 PM
1

I think OP had an issue with the section I had an issue with. "Eight days ago, Eritrean soldiers searching for suspected TPLF insurgents killed 13 people in Grizana, a village 50 miles south-west of Mekelle in an area where fierce fighting has taken place. The victims included three men in their 50s, several women, a 15-year-old and a two-year-old." At first I looked at this and thought of course they chose to highlight an incident where most of the victims were female. if you subtract 5 from 13…
/r/MensRights03/04/21 06:09 PM
2

or even the fact the bodyguard saw the funny side in the end. Cause what else was he supposed to do? There's no support for adult, male victims of female perpetrated sexual violence. That's why men will agree to view it as something else. This is why you see a huge difference in the lifetime and last 12 months statistics in the CDC NISVS. After about a year of getting no support and being told it's not really sexual assault, men view it as something else as a survival method. With male suicide b…
/r/MensRights20/03/21 07:15 PM
0

Kill all men is "worrisome"? Sounds kind of tame for "calling someone out". More like I think I should say something, but I don't want to.
/r/MensRights20/03/21 04:12 AM
2

The big wrench in the plan is of course who do they think will enforce it? The law abiding men will stay home. The criminals will see open season.
/r/MensRights18/03/21 12:40 AM
2

It makes no sense, but looking at the bright side, if they do have a gender neutral draft, it reduces the chance I get drafted because more women will be found fit for active duty.
/r/MensRights14/03/21 09:40 PM
3

That's for the clarification. In the u.s., there are some jurisdictions that even have a rape statute. Everything is classed as sexual assault. I have no issue with this. I also think that if feminists want their own word and there's a term that's ad equally "charged", might not have a problem with it. Maybe sexual violation. Only men can be sexually violated, that would drive feminists crazy.
/r/MensRights13/03/21 02:50 PM
1

Wouldn't that make their position more evil not less? It negates their entire argument as he could still charge her with a crime not rape. That would suggest their issue is with the level and possibly ease of punishment. Rape is a term with a long history. Sexual assault / abuse is relatively new as an articulated concept. It's been around, but not the term. It lumps women raping men with them flashing their boobs because it falls under the same code. People won't take it as seriously and they k…
/r/MensRights13/03/21 02:27 PM
1

I'm not saying that female lead countries handled the pandemic better than male lead ones, The MSM did. That's my point. They took a statistic that had way too many variables and postulated that women were better leaders under the pandemic. I'm pointing out media bias. You can look at vaccinations and draw an opposite conclusion, but they don't and they won't because it doesn't fit the narrative. It might be interesting to examine management styles. The traditional masculine style would be probl…
/r/MensRights25/02/21 06:17 AM
-1

Israel is the country with the most vaccines per population right now Israel is male. "Also, countries that originally dealt well with the pandemic don't have such an urgent need for the vaccines (look at new Zealand for example, they have pretty much 0 cased even though they only started to vaccinate recently). " Sure, but that was probably because there weren't many people traveling between New Zealand and China before people knew about covid. It makes it a lot easier to keep covid out when it…
/r/MensRights25/02/21 05:24 AM
1

If you completely disregard the effectiveness (or you take the average of the top 8 men led countries and you compare it to the lone woman's. I won't do the math, but adding just the top 2 and dividing by 8 gives you about 18, which is more than double the lone woman's only about 9 divided by one). More than that though, you miss the point. Had the numbers been reversed this would be touted as proof of women's superior leadership. Now if you want to look at actual vaccine manufacture. Off the to…
/r/MensRights25/02/21 04:15 AM
1

New dream? When was it different?
/r/MensRights25/02/21 02:16 AM
6

I understand her point and she's misguided. She claims that women have been cancelled for "resisting" harassment. I'm guessing that's true to an extent. I also think that many men have also been cancelled for similar. Since men have dominated the workforce in the past. I suspect many more men have been "cancelled" (lost jobs) than women. Union organizers would be a prime example. The biggest differences between men and women now is that men who have behaved badly in the past are being held to ac…
/r/MensRights21/02/21 03:46 AM
3

Stop femplaining.
/r/MensRights15/02/21 01:36 AM
1

That's what I thought because it's similar in the u.s. I suspected it was something like 71 to 29 being "roughly equal" to the feminists.
/r/MensRights22/01/21 05:05 AM
1

That only proves female privilege. The noose they put up for pence showed they wanted to remove him from earth.
/r/MensRights15/01/21 05:40 AM
1

I suspect they're secondary workers not because of the taxes, but because of the cost savings. It's more cost effective for her to stay home and care for the children than it would be for her to go to work and then pay for day care. That's why they don't see the same elasticity with childless women. You'd probably see something similar if you increased tax deductions for child care and dependents. You probably wouldn't see the same thing with tax credits. Tax deductions offset earned income, but…
/r/MensRights16/12/20 03:37 AM
2

Having to deal with constant whining is emotional labor. When will the feminists pay me?
/r/MensRights16/12/20 01:08 AM
1

"Using the same tax rates for single women and married women in a sense favours single women since they are taxed at a lower rate than their labour elasticity would entail,” the paper said." “However, arguments about affirmative action and potential discrimination apply to single women as well and therefore " Of course this exposes the BS as with many "woke" studies, their own data debunks their own theory. It also shows one other thing as well. Either the researchers are idiots or they believe …
/r/MensRights16/12/20 01:06 AM
2

"Many young men today have little to bring to the marriage bargain, especially as young women's educational levels on average now exceed their male suitors." Weren't they complaining that women's educational levels don't translate to increased wealth? Male plumbers at least where I live still tend to earn more than female social workers. How many theater majors and photography students are waiting tables? I know one who was still working at a bar 10 years after she graduated with 100K worth of d…
/r/MensRights04/12/20 10:53 PM
3

Actually, it makes sense. If she didn't know his age, then she's not guilty. It's called not having criminal intent assuming the law is similar to U.S. law. That doesn't mean there aren't issues. The first is, did she even access the page. It seems that she didn't if as she stated, they discussed his age. "I'm sure he told me he was 16 and I felt he looked much older. "It didn't occur to me that he might be underage. "He definitely didn't tell me he was in Year 9, or that he was only 14, before …
/r/MensRights04/12/20 10:05 PM
24

Even their analysis makes no sense. If men are leaving because they are uncomfortable, doesn't that mean female doctors actually are missing that "laundry list of skills" they supposedly have at least when it comes to treating male patients? They started with predetermined conclusions, twisted the data to support those conclusions, and ignored all evidence to the contrary.
/r/MensRights02/12/20 08:55 PM
18

Glad to know most men who are in prison never experienced childhood trauma, physical assaults, rough sleeping, mental illness, or alcohol or drug addiction. /s I remember talking to a woman in (I believe) Norway about prison rape in the U.S. and mentioned PREA stats. She told me they didn't have that problem in her country. I asked her if they didn't have the problem or if no one ever looked into it to find out. She admitted no one ever looked into it. That's probably why no one ever looks into …
/r/MensRights17/11/20 01:30 AM
2

I don't think that was true. I'm pretty sure women land owners were allowed to vote at least for a time and in certain states. "While the right of women to vote had not been specifically enshrined in the U.S. Constitution prior to the 19th Amendment, it hadn’t been prohibited either. For instance, single women owning property “worth fifty pounds” were allowed to vote in New Jersey between 1776 and 1807 before the right was restricted to white males " https://www.history.com/news/the-state-where-…
/r/MensRights14/11/20 12:18 PM
1

Here you go. https://journalstar.com/news/local/women-only-honor-flight-takes-135-veterans-from-nebraska-to-dc/article_86cbf1d5-6764-5779-ab03-d1b6ffcb078f.html Not a discount, but it was originally set up to honor veterans. They did one just for female veterans. I don't believe they did any that were just for men. Some may have ended up having only male veterans, but I doubt that was the objective.
/r/MensRights14/11/20 11:56 AM
1

Only if they had only discounts for male students. And to be fair. If you make an military discount. Than for all gender, because they all can be in the military They sometimes limit student discounts to "good" students. Student discounts may not even be the same. Look at car insurance companies. A female student could get a discount for being a student and a female. Of the discount were a percent, he would actually get a bigger student discount because he had a bigger base, but only then becaus…
/r/MensRights14/11/20 11:30 AM
3

Diseases are biological and when girls are routinely vaccinated for HPV and boys aren't, the reason some boy's die early is biological, but it was also preventable and the reason it wasn't was because of misandry.
/r/MensRights07/11/20 10:38 PM
2

Because up until a couple years ago women faced no real possibility of having to serve. That's why many feminists like Hillary Clinton supported drafting when (when there was no realistic chance of it happening) and have begun to rethink their support since the courts ruled there is no justification for excluding them.
/r/MensRights07/11/20 10:27 PM
1

Too late.
/r/MensRights02/11/20 09:27 PM
1

"I don’t think any sane person in the west is okay with genital mutilation. " What do you think infant, male, circumcision is? "I think the problem people have with abortion is the fact that few agree on where the life of a human begins. " That's why feminist heads explode when I ask why they don't demand an exception for rape and incest in pro-choice states because men aren't the only rapists and women aren't the only people raped. Their argument for the rape and incest exception is that even i…
/r/MensRights02/11/20 09:26 PM
1

Do we need to get people to care? I wonder. Do people really care about being woke or is it just "hip"? Can we accomplish what we want by making something trendy so people will virtue signal? I doubt many companies care about BLM. If they actually cared about diversity, wouldn't we see at least 25% of the fortune 500 CEOs being non-white males, but they contribute to BLM and "diversity" causes? Even if they didn't give a shit about abused men, they still might contribute to a men's shelter or ca…
/r/MensRights02/11/20 08:43 PM
1

Well let's try this as well. Let's say that whenever a woman applies for a credit card, the credit card company is required to add a man as an authorized user so she'd be financially responsible for every charge he made. What's that did the idea of forcing a woman to be financially responsible for a man's choices make you uncomfortable? Then maybe her sole choice her sole responsibility.
/r/MensRights02/11/20 08:26 PM
5

I found it to be offensive, but that's because I actually believe in bodily autonomy rights and did you notice that it's only the man who has to prove he's financially and emotionally fit to be a parent. The woman should be allowed to utilize the child to leech off the man financially. The other issue is many of these "pro choice" people are only pro choice when it comes to a woman's right to choose abortion. They don't support unilateral parental surrender (the legal abortion) and a ban on forc…
/r/MensRights02/11/20 08:06 PM
9

OK, but what else are you going to do expect women to obey the law? That would be insane. /s
/r/MensRights02/11/20 05:26 PM
3

I thought you were going to leave us alone. I'm good with that. See ya.
/r/MensRights02/11/20 04:20 PM
2

Ah, no. If you choose not to do anything. Well, that's on you. Don't tell other people how to feel or whether they should take action for something they believe in. That's insufferable.
/r/MensRights02/11/20 04:18 PM
3

Dude. The mental gymnastics you're doing is astonishing. I know you're slow. That's OK. We'll give you time to catch up. "it's just a commercial " OK, maybe they should have chosen to sell their product then instead of preach "and you're acting like it needs to be the standard of men's rights activism ". So you're suggesting we should not fight throat cancer because that would be acting as if that was THE cancer to address. I suggest that it's more your grasping for straws since you objections h…
/r/MensRights02/11/20 04:30 AM
1

You missed the fact that all the perpetrators were men and women were only portrayed as victims. Why would having a man stop an abusive woman negatively impact the stated goal of the ad? Isn't men standing up to abusive men and abusive women closer to men being the best they could be than men only standing up to abusive men?
/r/MensRights02/11/20 03:45 AM
3

I thought it was about men being the BEST they could be. That was their stated purpose. I maintain that men calling out abusive men AND abusive women is a lot closer to being the best they can be than men ONLY calling out abusive men. I suppose then you agree that they were being disingenuous, but let's assume that you're right. How is a man believing that a man shouldn't need help dealing with an abusive woman not toxic masculinity? Isn't expecting a man to be tough and invincible things we've …
/r/MensRights02/11/20 03:30 AM
6

Why is it enough to ask? Why didn't they have a scenario where a man stops an abusive woman? Shouldn't men step in then as well? I would argue that men are much less inclined to step in when a woman abuses another man and therefore needs more attention.
/r/MensRights02/11/20 02:22 AM
3

One of the issues I pointed out with the ad was that if Gillette was simply saying that men could be better by addressing instances of injustice / abuse as they claim, they could have incorporate scenarios with female abusers. In fact, I would argue that it's less socially acceptable and thus men are more reluctant to interject when he sees a woman abusing a man. The reason they did not choose to do this (aside from the ad being created by feminists) was because they wanted to state that men are…
/r/MensRights01/11/20 08:18 PM
3

They forgot and men will be blamed.
/r/MensRights23/10/20 11:39 PM
29

Also, did they talk about covid deaths and did she mention that men and minorities are mostly affected? It's also a valid point to point out that if they had not mentioned covid deaths and their impact on men, why she considered women losing their jobs as more worth a topic than men losing their lives.
/r/MensRights23/10/20 11:36 PM
17

"Alice admits she imagined herself as a boy when she was younger, but now believes being a lesbian is a 'greater' achievement. " She thought she was one at one point, but then realized that society screwed men over so decided against it.
/r/MensRights23/10/20 11:23 PM
4

I've advocated that for some time. There was a case before where the court had ruled that schools couldn't even put his case on hold until her's was adjudicated. It was an attempt by the school to find him guilty thereby not requiring them to even look at his case. I've challenged Alexandra Brodsky formerly of feministing and Know Your IX about her assertion that their intent is to "level the playing field". I asked how is it leveling the playing field when one party can be criminally charged wi…
/r/MensRights23/10/20 11:18 PM
1

It should, but the CDC calls it made to penetrate.
/r/MensRights26/09/20 02:50 AM
1

It's a twist on Darwin or perhaps the "poor man's Darwin". Darwin touted the survival of the fittest, but she's not even talking actual survival because everyone dies. That's why Darwin looked at survival as having the ability to pass on your genes. It still takes an egg and a sperm, but we'll see in the future.
/r/MensRights26/09/20 02:48 AM
1

Well, in fairness, the Ravens cannot fire Kimberly Davis, nor can the NFL Punishment is not the only way an organization can respond to DV. As I mentioned, there is also support if the employee is a victim and she could and should be barred from NFL properties / stadiums. There's a demand that the NFL have a DV policy for abusers. My point is what about victims? Vawa for instance provided an advocate to assist a "victim" with navigating the court system (Not straight men). They could give him pa…
/r/MensRights29/07/20 05:29 AM
1

Feminists don't come up with rational arguments that need to be countered. He means exhaust you by his shear refusal to see reality.
/r/MensRights23/07/20 04:08 AM
0

He was right about ladies nights and vawa though. The judge would only be correct about ladies nights if women didn't benefit from dating men (the judge said men drew benefit from there being more women, but wouldn't that just draw more men unless they limited the number of men who could enter)? Vawa also explicitly barred straight male victims from some victims services.
/r/MensRights23/07/20 01:29 AM
1

Did Hollander even have a motive to kill angelucci?
/r/MensRights23/07/20 01:09 AM
1

MSM is short for main stream media. Most main stream media outlets tend to push a liberal / fauxgressive (my own term meaning false progressive because there's been a lot of fascism on the left. They no longer stand for civil liberties, but right think.) narrative. That's why I see little difference between a "rag" like the Daily Mil and a "news organization" like NBC. For example, FOX got vilified by other news outlets for reporting that X said Y when X was unable to show any evidence for Y. I …
/r/MensRights20/07/20 02:31 PM
1

She and her husband are super "woke". Karma?
/r/MensRights20/07/20 06:40 AM
2

Feminists are fighting hard against the Karen thing, True, but as of now, they're mot making any traction. It seems to be moving into the modern lexicon as I've heard my nephews use the term to describe people who complain about trivial things or over react. It seems to have replaced at least in the short term the term extra. It's quite telling that they can't control the conversation and that has them rattled.
/r/MensRights20/07/20 06:11 AM
3

And if you open them and women get covid, you're a misogynist.
/r/MensRights01/07/20 12:21 AM
2

I thought about that too and also that consent can be withdrawn at any point including as the courts have held during a sexual act. There was a post here a while ago. A woman had decided to introduce affirmative consent to their relationship , which of course she accused her boyfriend of doing once it back fired extraordinarily. She realized she could get advantage in the relationship by welding the power of no. He decided that OK, but every physical interaction should require affirmative consen…
/r/MensRights25/06/20 11:13 PM
1

Remember ask jeeves? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ask.com
/r/MensRights24/06/20 05:32 AM
1

IMO, not quite. If she hits you twice then you are. If a person hits you once, is there an automatic assumption that they'll strike you again? Maybe, maybe not. There is a gray area there. If a person strikes you twice, It's reasonable to assume that they'll continue to strike you until stopped. Striking back would be self defense to stop a reasonably expected attack. There is a distinction between self defense and retribution. I'm not sure you have a right to retribution. Also, do people have a…
/r/MensRights21/06/20 02:11 AM
0

Women applaud women for doing these things. So, which is worse?
/r/MensRights21/06/20 01:52 AM
1

One of the things with Gillette is that they hired a feminist marketing company. This marketing company may have done the "research" and told Gillette that this was a "winning" marketing strategy. I wouldn't be surprised if the marketing company hadn't interpreted the data in such a way as to make it appear to support the narrative they already intended to push. I'm not suggesting let Gillette off the hook. They're definitely responsible for what they approved. I'm just wondering why it went so …
/r/MensRights21/06/20 01:43 AM
1

I suspect you got down voted because you suggested she had a mental illness, but her primary motivation seems to be getting money from the victim's compensation fund. BTW, why do people assume that when a woman does bad things, she must be mentally ill, but a man would simply be evil?
/r/MensRights14/06/20 07:37 PM
3

She actually made like 15 false accusations. That's like 8 months / false accusation. Justice was kind of done.
/r/MensRights14/06/20 05:03 AM
11

Some fauxgressives (The term I give to far left facists) had even suggested that the BLM protests were infiltrated by white supremacists, who were the ones who actually did the rioting and looting. I looked at some of the footage and thought there are an awful lot of black people in the white supremacy movement these days. http://archive.is/id3nU
/r/MensRights12/06/20 05:12 AM
6

Wait. Wasn't charging people with false reports supposed to stop real victims from reporting or something? /S
/r/MensRights07/06/20 04:59 AM
3

What about Andrew Finch who was a innocent man shot when he answered the door for the police officers? He don't count because he's white. Tell me again that you're black. My father was white. My mother Filipino. They were married when inter racial marriage was still illegal in many states. I grew up in a mostly white neighbor hood in the most segregated city in the U.S. in the 70s and half don't mean squat. Tell me again about racism as if I haven't faced more of it than you. I've seen it and I …
/r/MensRights05/06/20 03:50 AM
1

So are black men not men? Oh, that's right your goddess feminism will throw them under the bus as soon as it benefits women to do so.
/r/MensRights05/06/20 03:31 AM
1

They might, but I'm not sure that it matters because the second charge he plead guilty to from what I've been reading stems from the first. "Honest services are not defined by federal law, but have ranged from money to property to “intangible rights” given to the public. " https://werksmanjackson.com/blog/what-is-honest-services-fraud/#:~:text=Honest%20services%20fraud%20is%20defined,applied%20across%20the%20United%20States. Best guess is that the fraud count was for defrauding the school. The h…
/r/MensRights05/06/20 02:41 AM
7

Because men aren't the people overwhelmingly killed by police? White men are killed by police at three times the rate of black women based on their proportion of the population. I don't see how this is more an issue of race than gender.
/r/MensRights05/06/20 02:21 AM
8

It's here because of her sentiment which is that it would have been appropriate, necessary, or at least expected to do to a man. She demands special protections for women. She also equates men with animals.
/r/MensRights05/06/20 02:17 AM
3

What if your bi-racual, Asian and White? Do I have to add them together to find my chance of being killed or is it an average?
/r/MensRights04/06/20 08:05 PM
2

I know it's big, but I wouldn't say the world revolves around it. :)
/r/MensRights04/06/20 08:01 PM
2

"Last year, a 69-year-old activist who “lived for [migrant] integration” and “did everything for unaccompanied minors”, was reportedly murdered by a young migrant with whom she had sexual relations. The 20-year-old immigrant was sentenced to 11 years in prison and deportation after he argued in court that he had felt exploited by the much older woman" So basically he claimed he killed his rapist and was sentenced to 11 years and deportation. Feminists remain silent.
/r/MensRights04/06/20 07:57 PM
2

The UN banned communal punishment (I think it was the charter of human rights), but regressives, who idolize the UN, only seem to want to apply it to communities that are not white or male.
/r/MensRights04/06/20 07:46 PM
1

There are people who don't think white lives matter or male lives matter so it's OK to have a white lives matter, but not an all lives matter? "Kori Ali Muhammad logged onto the free Wi-Fi at a California Starbucks, saw that police were seeking him for the shooting death of a motel manager and made a decision -- to “kill as many white men” as he could before he was caught. " https://www.kiro7.com/news/trending/confession-accused-fresno-spree-killer-wanted-kill-many-white-men-he-could/FGWQSR255JH…
/r/MensRights04/06/20 07:34 PM
1

I have no problems not watching his movies, but he should divest from me too. He shouldn't allow any of his movies to stream on any streaming service so I don't have to support them. Also, return the money I spent on his DVDs. I'll send him the discs and tell him were he can put them.
/r/MensRights04/06/20 07:31 PM
7

it seems like he pleaded guilty to two seperate things while she only pleaded guilty to one. Sure, but that was a plea bargain. I'm not familiar with the case either and don't know what charges they faced. It wouldn't surprise me if the plea offer by the prosecutors itself was discriminatory.
/r/MensRights04/06/20 07:19 PM
0

Because feminists devalue women and that's the standard you're using when you say are considered. A more pragmatic reason although I doubt that this is the actual reason is that the world has 8,000,000,000 people so reproduction is no longer considered as valuable as it used to be and resource acquisition being able to provide for that many people becomes more valuable. Still when you talk inherent. Women are valued because they could (might potentially) do something (reproduce). Men are valued …
/r/MensRights04/06/20 05:32 PM
1

"consequence occurs, you are responsible for fixing the situation. " Sure, but the expected rebuttal rebuttal would be drinking might negatively affect your kidneys. A doctor may have to treat you through dialysis, You do not get to cut some one else's kidney out to fix the problem. Some fixes are not morally acceptable especially when they impact another's rights.
/r/MensRights02/06/20 01:23 AM
2

I think it has to do with censorship. Banning may be part of that. It's my understanding though that it was already the "law". Immunity from libel suits was given to forums not publishers because forums don't control content. The Trump administration is (belatedly) asserted that many on line platforms are behaving like publishers (controlling content) while demanding the protections afforded to forums. IDK if it expanded on it to include terms of service so that it would open companies up to bre…
/r/MensRights31/05/20 12:38 AM
1

TL/DR saving lives is the most important thing unless something affects women more then lives are unimportant.
/r/MensRights29/05/20 12:17 AM
2

This probably isn't true. From what I've seen, you can probably forget any who "ain't black". That means you can probably keep Warren because I'm pretty sure she'll identify as black shortly.
/r/MensRights28/05/20 11:58 PM
0

As bad as Trump is, I believe Biden is a worse pick. Trump may be fascist, but so is Biden with his anti due process, correct think, state. Biden also has the drawback of not being all there mentally. He could be the first President declared mentally unfit to take office prior to serving his term.
/r/MensRights28/05/20 11:52 PM
4

"So you can knock up a woman and as soon as you find out she's pregnant, you can simply offer to pay for abortion and all your fatherly responsibilities are gone?" Exactly, that's my big issue with the ruling. If it led to a "legal" abortion (unilateral parental surrender), I would have no issue with it, but it was only ruled this way because she wanted to be rid of the child. If she wanted to keep it, he'd be stuck with child support. Another thing I hadn't previously mentioned is that her pare…
/r/MensRights21/05/20 06:50 PM
3

Of course the alternate explanation is that people are f*cking dying. Scientists have no patients for the "diversity hires" at this time. They can play at being scientists later after lives are saved.
/r/MensRights18/05/20 02:28 AM
13

So why haven't they arrested the girl who sent the rape chats if it's illegal? Just because it's a girl, it's now OK?
/r/MensRights12/05/20 11:28 PM
5

Did they ever bother to ask the kid?
/r/MensRights08/05/20 03:28 AM
1

I don't think I would have unless her apology were public and posted ion the "official" page for at least a year in a prominent position on the home screen, otherwise, I don't see the apology doing him any good. I may also demand the "official" page become public so every one can see it.
/r/MensRights08/05/20 03:16 AM
-1

First, if you believe in unrestricted abortion then you should have no issue with it. Once you say abortion is wrong under X, Y, and Z, you no longer believe in unrestricted abortion. Second, if you believe abortion is OK because a fetus is not a person, then it's not an MRM issue. Third, how can you suggest you can't abort for sex, but it's OK to abort because you don't feel like taking care of the kids and you don't want anyone else to have him? Lastly, it's hypocritical for people to support …
/r/MensRights05/05/20 05:50 PM
1

When I was small, I had a fascination for women truckers. Actually no and I really doubt anyone does or cares. It was written not because it would get more clicks than an article about workers on the front lines. It got written because the publisher is pushing a narrative probably because of sexism against men.
/r/MensRights05/05/20 05:36 PM
1

Men dying is insignificant?
/r/MensRights05/05/20 05:29 PM
2

Since men are twice as likely to die of covid and are 90 percent of the prison population, you only need to find 16 more.
/r/MensRights05/05/20 05:28 PM
2

How many men's magazines are actually for men these days? GQ pretty much went full feminist. Playboy is run by women and last I read moved toward heterosexual couples.
/r/MensRights05/05/20 05:24 PM
6

I mostly agree. I will point one thing out though. Feminists also complained that men stayed away from women who were abused. So essentially it's the same as always. Men need to be able to read women's minds to see if they really want space or are just saying that so you can try harder.
/r/MensRights03/05/20 06:46 PM
1

You provided one (the census) and I provided the (IRS joint filing). That'd precisely how some one can earn wages without working. Those are official definitions. Those aren't the definitions you want to use because they're not "common". So you're argument is based largely on the meaning and it's not even the official meanings. It's the msm has given to words in order to frame an argument to support a narrative that doesn't exist. If a woman doesn't work and doesn't receive public assistance, ho…
/r/MensRights02/05/20 10:31 PM
3

There was a women's nude wrestling federation like 20 years ago. I think it was Carmen Elektra who founded it or maybe was just a spokes person. It didn't survive. Yeah novelty, but there were feminists who said stupid things like people will stop watching the NFL if they got rid of the cheerleaders. I pointed out that like 6 teams already did. It's that whole porn opportunity cost. I could watch decent looking women play soccer nude or really hot lesbian action.
/r/MensRights02/05/20 10:01 PM
4

She wants a day where she's not "harassed". That'd be basically every day after she turns 35. She'll probably be like Valenti and complain that after she turned 35 men don't chat her up or look at her anymore.
/r/MensRights01/05/20 11:43 PM
2

"to the extra education and childcare work created through closures of school and day care, where men have also been known, on average, to skimp. " That's not extra. Somebody has always been doing it. If women are doing it now, it's because they've been known to on average skimp on it. The bulk of the cost of providing this childcare falling more on men (whether tuition, fees, or taxes) than women.
/r/MensRights30/04/20 10:40 PM
1

Let me see if I can make it a bit more coherent. Note that I'm not disagreeing. I'm trying to understand where the argument is coming from. We use the census to define wage. We pick that because it's an "authoritarian" source. It's a government source so it's a legal definition. Wages are a subset of earnings which is a subset of income. Essentially wages are income from "work". Again census legal definition. Four corners rule of law states that the contract is what is contained within the four …
/r/MensRights30/04/20 03:11 PM
1

Why should it be limited to full time workers? There's nothing in the definition requiring a person to actually work any hours to be paid a wage. Their wage would simply be infinite. I'm on my phone so can't really link, but there was a discussion on signing bonuses and whether it's a wage since it's payment for work that hasn't been done and isn't contingent on any work being done. They eventually came down on it being a wage.
/r/MensRights30/04/20 01:29 PM
4

She also forced him to get a vasectomy then divorces him a couple years later.
/r/MensRights30/04/20 01:12 PM
1

It might help if you linked where you get the definitions. This is what I found. https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/cps/data/data-tools/cps-table-creator-help/income-definitions.html The census defines income and where it's derived. "Earnings (wages, salaries, and self-employment income) " It doesn't specifically discount the "house wife" It had to be derived from wages, salaries, etc. It does not say that she actually had to be the one to to work the hours. I'm pretty sure the IRS would co…
/r/MensRights30/04/20 03:05 AM
1

Is your argument semantic or factual? For example, the way earnings gap is used it means money earned from work. It recognizes that different forms of work will have different values. It's not a function of time. It's a function of value. Now you're suggesting that earnings actually mean something else including non-wage income. That might be true with a semantic argument, but then why do you define wage so narrowly? "The often reported "wage gap" does generally differentiate between full time e…
/r/MensRights29/04/20 06:03 AM
1

I try not to click on buzzfeed articles. U'll look at it if someone posts an archive.
/r/MensRights29/04/20 05:49 AM
1

Men are much more likely to go to prison than women. Why does this happen? Poverty and crime are directly linked. Who is expected to provide for the family? Men Interestingly enough there could be another form of historical discrimination. In the past, men were responsible for the debts of their wives. My memory is abit sketchy, but I remember a movie or book. I believe it was The Great Train Robbery. There was a character who took advantage of the fact that women at that time were not considere…
/r/MensRights27/04/20 06:49 PM
6

A lot of the stuff that was left wing is considered right wing these days and a lot of the stuff that was considered right wing in the past is now considered left wing. It usually depends on which ideology happens to be in power. It's now leftists who want to ban free speech and due process because the establishment has accepted or at least parrots their dogma.
/r/MensRights27/04/20 06:33 PM
14

To be fair they used the word EARN rather than are PAID. This may actually be true. A few years ago there was a push to rename the wage gap to the earnings gap. The push did not come from feminists BTW.
/r/MensRights27/04/20 06:29 PM
2

This is simply white women trying to cash in on the suffering of people of color. It shouldn't be surprising. Women's suffrage was born of racism. If black men could vote, white women certainly should be able to. Of course, the civil rights movement of the 502 spawn ed the feminist movement of the 70s. If POC were historically oppressed then white women must have been too. That's not just morally disingenuous (cashing in on someone else suffering), but also logically fallacious. Everyone has a m…
/r/MensRights26/04/20 08:35 PM
3

That means everybody else doing their jobs for them. So basically no different from any other job. :)
/r/MensRights26/04/20 05:14 PM
2

It's because girls are privileged over boys in education so of course they'll lose more if it's interrupted.
/r/MensRights25/04/20 06:02 PM
1

I was looking to have some elective surgery done. What stopped me was something the nurse said. She said there would always be at least three people in the operating room while I was out. I noticed that there were four women in the office and the only man was the doctor so I asked if there would always be at least one male. She looked at me kind of weird and couldn't assure it. That's when I knew that if I were to have it done, it wouldn't be there. I figured that there would only ever need to b…
/r/MensRights25/04/20 04:02 AM
1

The article starts out fine, but then I wonder. "but she has been forced live apart from her postie husband Jonathan " It was nothing they can do. "Abigail, from Trowbridge, Wiltshire, opted to live apart from Jonathan " Well, maybe not nothing they could do. "It’s why Abigail decided they couldn’t risk living together as a family. " Doesn't Jonathan get to decide? I'm not saying he wouldn't male the same decision or that it wasn't the right one, but shouldn't he have equal say? "Abigail also to…
/r/MensRights22/04/20 05:27 PM
3

"Meanwhile, several cities in North Rhine-Westphalia are rejecting the offer of a company that is prepared to provide, build and install heated sleeping containers for the homeless for free. Too much effort. Saving men's lives takes too much effort. " Wrong, they're actually expending effort to ensure men aren't helped. We've seen that many times before. I believe it was during the 2001 VAWA re-authorization. The Democrats wanted to include Native Americans. Lindsey Graham, The Republican Speake…
/r/MensRights22/04/20 04:06 AM
4

If they assume every man has a woman to buy food for him it makes perfect sense That also assume that every man has a woman who'll buy food for him and not use the fact that he couldn't buy it for himself as a means to abuse him.
/r/MensRights19/04/20 07:12 PM
6

IDK about Australia. In the U.S. not guilty by reason of insanity means you're incapable of knowing right from wrong. It gets to criminal intent. There's no criminal intent because you didn't know it was wrong. The difference between murder and manslaughter isn't criminal intent, it's whether something was premeditated. It sounds to me that she committed murder, but the jury didn't want to convict her of murder probably because she's female and killed a male. Possibly in part because she's white…
/r/MensRights18/04/20 01:46 AM
1

But you only needed one of them to come up with the theory of relativity and one of them did.
/r/MensRights16/04/20 07:02 PM
1

You don't even have to go the social justice route. Women do all kind of things that make their guy friends uncomfortable. I've had female friends walk around in their panties and a t-shirt. Not even a long one or talk about how hot some guy they saw was. We had a bachelor party once and were reminiscing in another room. They realized it and demanded to see the pictures. There are certain things we just didn't want them to be a part of. I'm sure other guys come tell you stuff too.
/r/MensRights16/04/20 06:50 PM
2

No these women have actually accused the boy of being a predator. I remember one instance on The Curvature. Kulwicki was discussing the first PREA report on rape in juvenile prisons. To her credit, it was actually very good. She even suggested that until they could prevent the rape of juveniles by adult employees, they should restrict employees to the same gender as the juveniles in custody. The only comment on the article was from a fellow, feminist, women who claimed to have volunteered at juv…
/r/MensRights16/04/20 06:39 PM
1

"The demise of men? " Lost in the article. "This in turn can ultimately drive the formation of entirely new species. ... males and females are both still necessary for reproduction. " I guess the MSM feels it's better to discuss a "happy topic", Yay some day we'll be rid of those genetically inferior men, rather than we're all screwed. Fast forward 4,599,900 years. You'll see articles, human race to be extinct in 100 years and it's men's fault. The interesting thing about the Y chromosome is tha…
/r/MensRights16/04/20 12:17 PM
2

I'm taking a wild guess here, but I'm thinking that the people who do this aren't the ones complaining that male rape victims aren't being taken seriously. Just a hunch.
/r/MensRights16/04/20 11:48 AM
3

I've heard both as well. Overwhelmingly men, but not exclusively. I've seen women down play though by victim blaming. He's not "lucky". He's a predator. I've ever only seen women support making him pay his rapist child support. There's also a huge group of people, feminists the vast majority of whom are women, claim it's not actually rape therefore he's not harmed or he's not as harmed as a girl so it's "rape lite".
/r/MensRights16/04/20 11:46 AM
7

This is an opinion editorial written by Leta Hong Fincher To be even clearer, there is a distinction between a publisher and a forum. Reddit is an example of a forum, your opinions are not pre-screened. As long as they don't violate forum rules / terms of service, they remain up. CNN is an example of a publisher, they control and approve what content goes on their site. I can't just publish a piece on their site. Short answer is that even if it's an opinion. It's an opinion CNN chose to publish.
/r/MensRights15/04/20 05:27 PM
3

I've just been seeing a lot of that lately. Lori Lightfoot's commercial mentioned girls and all our children and some guy running for judge fought to protect women from discrimination and equality for everyone or something like that. It's like those bathrooms where one says women and the other all genders.
/r/MensRights15/04/20 01:56 AM
1

That's not what she was claiming. She said he touched her vagina. The result was consistent with the accused behavior. If she lied about the original accusation, I'm guessing that she is not "wrong", she's simply lying again.
/r/MensRights14/04/20 05:01 PM
2

It's not toxic masculinity when a woman rapes a man. I see this as the same menslib / "good" feminism that wants to show some compassion for male victims, but refuses to hold female perpetrators responsible. You're definition of good and mine are probably not the same.
/r/MensRights14/04/20 04:25 PM
2

King Solomon would have probably thought he deserves the child because she would rather put the child in danger than give him up.
/r/MensRights14/04/20 04:20 PM
1

"Northern Arizona Orthopedics Sued by EEOC for Gender Discrimination and Retaliation " EEOC stands for Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. They enforce anti-discrimination laws. Retaliating against some one who complains is also illegal. Medical Provider Refused to Hire Men and Retaliated Against an Applicant for Complaining, Essentially lists the charges. The conduct the government is alleging is illegal.
/r/MensRights13/04/20 03:02 PM
2

This was published by the Office for Women. Of course their focus is going to be on women. There also similar campaigns that focus purely on men, such as the One in Three Campaign. I noticed that, but my thought was if I accept this as an answer, then the issue is where is the office for men? I looked at the One in Three campaign and it's not what you suggest. "One in Three is a diverse group of male and female professionals – academics, researchers, social workers, psychologists, counsellors, l…
/r/MensRights13/04/20 01:15 PM
1

I'm not sure. It might just be about women growing up and realizing what's important in life. I knew a woman who had 3 kids from 2 different guys. The first was an abusive, bad boy. The other 2 by her husband, a good man. When she was younger she valued all the wrong things. Her priorities changed probably in part because she had the kid and became responsible for another human being. The thing that strikes me is that she truly loves her husband. She was completely gorgeous. Some guys have told …
/r/MensRights11/04/20 06:57 PM
1

Most games are handicapped to make things more competitive thus making it more enjoyable. I'm guessing that women are probably just as good at playing monopoly as men and it probably wasn't enjoyable for either men or women. Just proves there is nothing more misogynistic than modern feminism.
/r/MensRights11/04/20 06:33 PM
1

I suspect the change was driven to increase the number of female suicides because some woke idiot probably thought that women just had to be most likely to commit suicide. They just needed to come up with a definition which proved it.
/r/MensRights11/04/20 06:03 PM
4

I think it would be published. The framing would be different. EDIT: After reading the archive, I can see your point. I agree that it would never be published in total without commentary. I still think it would be published as a third person see how evil men are narrative.
/r/MensRights11/04/20 03:59 PM
1

There was an issue in the rape victim community several years ago. Many "professional victims advocates" kept pushing the mantra that rape was worse than death. Some victims pushed back saying don't say I'd be better off dead. As I mentioned to one menslibber type feminist, the big problem with telling them they'd be better off dead is that they might believe you and that's always an option.
/r/MensRights10/04/20 03:39 AM
1

90% of the homeless are men so it's men who are oppressed in society.
/r/MensRights10/04/20 03:25 AM
1

Well, shouldn't they be?
/r/MensRights10/04/20 03:22 AM
2

It could have been space aliens or an immaculate conception too. I suspect OP's point is if a man were the prime suspect, would the police be exploring possible reasons why he wasn't guilty?
/r/MensRights09/04/20 11:29 PM
1

I suspect OP's point is that unless disposing of human remains is not illegal, a crime was committed. This is beyond reasonable doubt. If the child is new born, it was very recently in the possession of the mother. This is also beyond doubt. It is reasonable to assume the mother is the primary suspect in the absence of any other evidence. When is it normal for the police to have more concern for the perpetrator of a crime than the actual crime? Add to that, it would be reasonable for the police …
/r/MensRights09/04/20 11:20 PM
1

That's not the point they're trying to make. They look at Michigan, which is majority white, and ask why most of the covid cases are in Detroit. They point out that certain areas are hit harder than others and note that those areas hardest hit are majority black. I've seen a few "back flips" when they tried to make it a socio-economic problem and ran into the Hispanic issue. Many Hispanic areas in my city would be quite surprised to discover that they've become as affluent as the white sub-urban…
/r/MensRights09/04/20 10:12 PM
5

Women's empowerment. Can't tell women they can't hit their SOs and suggesting to women there might be consequences for their actions is dis-empowering.
/r/MensRights06/04/20 03:01 PM
2

True. I think if people left it like that, it would be fine. It becomes victim blaming when it's used as a rationale for a higher morbidity rate among men. “Sure, there are some behaviors that might affect the number of infections,” he said. “But why should poor hand-washing lead to death for a patient who’s already in intensive care? It’s ridiculous.” " Just realized I forgot to link the article. http://archive.is/CukvE Beyond this I think there is an issue in the way the data is presented. Fir…
/r/MensRights06/04/20 02:58 AM
7

I'd like to point one other thing out. It's an accounting trick that they use. An accusation often already puts a man behind bars. It's called jail, where one awaits trial. That's different than prison, where one serves time after a conviction. Where is the accounting trick? Every accusation is assumed true unless proven false (already pointed out by you), but when a person spends time in jail, but is never convicted or acquitted (ie has the charges dropped), they're not counted as rapists. So i…
/r/MensRights03/04/20 08:50 PM
1

How many rape prosecutions of men have there been with no video evidence and where the accuser was drugged / drunk and had no memory? IDK the details. Maybe he only performed oral sex on his victims. Maybe he had a special technique that left no anal tearing / discomfort. Maybe he meticulously put everything back in place or his victims just weren't as anal as I am ( I always set my belt to the last hole and always tuck my under shirt into my under pants). I suspect though that if you are correc…
/r/MensRights03/04/20 08:35 PM
6

I think most men are protective of feminine women. I believe most men are compassionate to disabled men. When men are told that women are just as tough and capable as a man, he'll no longer defer to her. If she's as capable as a man, she can change her own flat tire or dig her car out of the snow, etc. Women view this lack of deference as being an assh*le even though she would never even consider changing a man's tire for him.
/r/MensRights01/04/20 03:44 PM
1

I have a friend who sells comics and toys. He told me the female action figures (probably pre-1980) were sought out by collectors (I believe mostly men) because there weren't a lot mass produced (BTW Topps can bite me. I heard that's why my 1980s MLB card collection is worthless. They over produced.). It was that way because there was little demand from girls. I was reminded of that conversation during that whole women's only Wonder Woman screening and how she was supposed to be an iconic figure…
/r/MensRights31/03/20 10:14 PM
1

There was a case in Illinois where a guy killed a little girl and three innocent men were tried for her murder. They got convictions on the 2 Hispanic guys. There was a hung jury on the white. He wasn't acquitted, but it was telling that they didn't bother to retry him for the murder of a child. I think it was because the police knew they were "fishing". Anyway the two wrongfully convicted men were "exonerated". The real killer (another white man) admitted to killing her after he killed a second…
/r/MensRights31/03/20 07:04 PM
3

At least that's "progressive". Disney / Marvel went with a white woman instead of a woman of color (the first female captain marvel) and a white woman for the ancient one instead of am Asian man or even an Asian woman.
/r/MensRights31/03/20 11:37 AM
1

I was an angry MRA then I decided to join my oppressors for slightly better treatment.
/r/MensRights30/03/20 05:45 PM
1

Femininity so fragile.
/r/MensRights29/03/20 11:29 PM
1

He stopped buying her stuff.
/r/MensRights29/03/20 07:10 PM
2

Don't you think it's interesting that it's an unpopular OPINION rather than fact? The issue is feminism is not incomparable with female supremacy.
/r/MensRights29/03/20 06:41 PM
7

Almost 3 out of 4 people who test positive in Italy are men, but women have the most exposure? Doesn't make sense. Makes me think the "researchers" started with the goal of determining women were most exposed and then categorized the job's exposure risks to support their predetermined conclusion.
/r/MensRights29/03/20 06:07 PM
7

There are 672,000 people in Detroit. https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/detroitcitymichigan,US/PST045218 2,200 are police according to linked article. That's about 300 / police officer. 850 cases of covid-19 with 39 police. That's about 1 every 22 cases. Police have an infection rate 14 times that of the general population. How is that not an occupational hazard?
/r/MensRights28/03/20 07:10 PM
2

Good point, but I'd like to make another. The media wants to push the narrative that the only people fighting corona virus on the front lines are medical staff. The police and fire fighters are also first respondents and have also taken a hit from covid-19. They simply do it without all the protective gear that the nurses and doctors had. My nephew works in a hospital as security, but he's also an EMT. Not all medical professionals treating patients are doctors / nurses. Law enforcement need to …
/r/MensRights26/03/20 07:36 PM
4

There is no chance. I remember a discussion in high school our teacher wanted to start about slavery in the south. Of course, the first comment was "I wouldn't beat my slaves". The teacher replied that isn't the problem. The problem is they're owned. That sums up moderate feminism, be kind to your slaves. Feminists have never supported telling women they can't do something even abuse. They're afraid that it is dis-empowering. They won't support banning MGM, but will tell women they shouldn't hav…
/r/MensRights22/03/20 12:11 AM
2

Except that goes away during divorce. She gets to continue to benefit for her "unpaid" labor while he either has to do it or pay some one else to. Why wouldn't they then factor this into the "wage gap"? They only count it when convenient.
/r/MensRights21/03/20 11:38 PM
1

"And in Britain today, a quarter of families are headed by a single parent, more than 90 percent of whom are women." Because women get custody about 90% of the time when parents split, but also because men don't have the right to a legal abortion. How many women would have had their children against the father's wishes if he could legally, unilaterally, surrender his rights and responsibilities.
/r/MensRights21/03/20 01:24 AM
1

But Labour suffered a massive loss, Maybe the pandering was the reason. Warren and Clinton thought pandering to man haters was the way to go also. On the other hand, I don't remember Obama bringing race up on the campaign trail.
/r/MensRights19/03/20 01:08 AM
1

Prize money has nothing to do with it. Prize money has everything to do with it. Their asking the USSF to make up the prize money FIFA didn't give them. Here's the problem, they don't deserve it. The revenue they generated for the world cup was negligible. "The women’s teams made decent money most years for the USSF/SUM/MLS. The big thing is that they also provided general population viewers and fans since they always did well in the Olympics and World " That popularity never translated into mon…
/r/MensRights17/03/20 07:15 AM
1

It might, but that doesn't mean it can't bring peace in the form of stability. Look at the Baltic Wars. The Croats, Bosnians, and Serbs didn't start killing each other until the authoritarian Soviet Union broke up. Those ethnic divisions were there anyway, but there was a ruthless, dictatorial government that demanded that racial and religious politics / divisions be subordinate to the States interests.
/r/MensRights17/03/20 04:23 AM
2

It's happened to me 4 times off the top of my head. I was walking with my boss. We were talking. I turned into the men's room. She followed me and continued our discussion while I was positioned in front of the urinal until I asked her if she was planning on watching me pee. I was at a night club with some friends. There were 3 guys and one woman. We went to the bathroom. She got up as well and followed us in. She was actually talking to us while we were at the urinals. I was at a night club. A …
/r/MensRights17/03/20 02:52 AM
1

Am I wrong here? I don't think so, but neither are they. Some assert that you can't kill your way into security, but that's been proven false as well. I remember a time when there were car bombs in Israel like every week. After a a couple months of attacks, Israel disarmed a muslin refugee camp and then left allowing a Christian militia to come in and slaughter like 1,000 people. After that, the car bombs stopped. ISIS was defeated not by the U.S., but by Russia because the Russians didn't care …
/r/MensRights17/03/20 02:25 AM
2

Before I get to that, I want to make a correction lest we downplay the ridiculousness of their position. The want USSF to male up the difference in prize money. Getting to your point. Let's look at past discrimination. How much money did those women's teams make? A lot less than the men's so there wasn't pay discrimination then either. Maybe you're talking about societal discrimination. Fair enough then how do you factor in all the men and boys who couldn't play soccer because they had their leg…
/r/MensRights17/03/20 12:31 AM
1

But, this is about what is going on here in the US and with the USSF. If you factor out the FIFA money, like I said that's really where the big discrepancy comes from, their pay is comparable. The difference in pay is offset by the security of pay. The women's team is guaranteed a salary. The men only get paid if they play. The USWNT doesn't really want the same contract as the men, otherwise they would ask for it. They want the same pay as the men, while keeping their added perks and the pay se…
/r/MensRights17/03/20 12:05 AM
1

Lord Lucas for one and he apparently has a vote to actually implement it.
/r/MensRights16/03/20 11:55 PM
1

If you don't look at the World Cup money, which is where the pay disparity occurs. The women's world cup has a prize pool of $30 million and the men's $400 million. Before you think that's sexist, the women's world cup generated $73,000,000 and the men's $4 billion. " the 2015 Women’s World Cup “brought in almost $73 million, of which the players got 13%. The 2010 men’s World Cup in South Africa made almost $4 billion, of which 9% went to the players Last year, the men’s World Cup in Russia gene…
/r/MensRights16/03/20 05:26 AM
1

Not if the men's salary is depended on it too. I'm pretty sure they'd pick that over a 90% pay cut.
/r/MensRights15/03/20 06:43 PM
1

It's easy because they don't care about men.
/r/MensRights15/03/20 04:07 AM
1

Most first respondents are men. The big difference is they don't have access to the protective medical equipment. "The city distributed expired, half-empty hand sanitizer and a single mask to NYPD officers Friday after their union complained of a lack of coronavirus supplies, police sources said. " https://nypost.com/2020/03/14/nypd-gives-cops-expired-hand-sanitizer-single-mask-to-combat-coronavirus/
/r/MensRights15/03/20 12:25 AM
21

Fortunately her desire to grow her empire was greater than her devotion to the feminist cause. I was reading an article a feminist wrote about all the feminists who helped men. I'm not debating that there weren't self identified feminists who helped men or at least tried to. Erin Pizzy comes to mind. Anyway, I selected one feminist at random. I don't remember her name, but she started CALM. I checked into the history of CALM and it started because a politician was alarmed at the high rate of sui…
/r/MensRights15/03/20 12:02 AM
0

Shared parenting, parental alienation, and fathers rights aren't "buzz words".
/r/MensRights06/03/20 08:53 PM
1

" Every now and then God puts people in the middle of a storm so that they can find strength in him again and I have. " It was God's fault. Of course blame the "nearest man".
/r/MensRights03/03/20 02:05 AM
3

If coast means California and it's single occupancy, it's probably unisex by law even the women's room. They just adopted that law in Illinois at least when it pertains to government buildings. I'm unsure of Illinois and private establishments. FYI, if it is California, they have some of the strictest discrimination laws. The Unruh Act prevents discrimination in public establishments and even though they can make the argument that there is a bathroom for the use of men, you can make the point th…
/r/MensRights03/03/20 01:56 AM
2

So they're saying it was historical discrimination. Well we should remedy that shouldn't we in a similar way in which they demand historical discrimination against women be addressed. I suggest only arresting women in cases of reciprocal DV.
/r/MensRights27/02/20 09:19 PM
3

Wrong conjunction. It should be goddesses AND victims. The narrative pushed by the MSM is that women are both superior to AND oppressed by men. True, holding two contradictory views is a logical fallacy, but that should really be the definition of feminism. It's a fallacy.
/r/MensRights26/02/20 12:49 AM
6

Nothing, but some of the laws in the U.S. don't require the crime to be committed here in order to be prosecuted here. https://www.ice.gov/news/releases/notice-us-citizens-your-actions-abroad-may-have-serious-consequences So the question is really what stops a criminal from committing a crime? If the answer is nothing, ask yourself then why we have criminal laws. They serve as a deterrent and punishment after the fact. It's not difficult for a doctor, a mandatory reporter of child abuse, to tell…
/r/MensRights26/02/20 12:45 AM
2

It's my understanding that there is another type of female circumcision called the ceremonial nic, which is significantly less traumatic than a routine, "successful", MGM.
/r/MensRights25/02/20 08:46 PM
10

I've always found it interesting that FGM (labiaplasty) is not illegal. It's only illegal to perform it on someone who has not given "informed" consent. MGM on the other hand isn't just routinely performed on people who aren't able to give consent (having sex with some one incapable of giving consent is considered rape), but from what I understand is actually paid for by the government (covered by medicaid). If that's still the case, it would amount to a government endorsement.
/r/MensRights25/02/20 04:09 PM
2

" It's the same reason why you shouldn't give credence to terms like toxic masculinity and the patriarchy or 'male privilege'. " That assumes that language never and can't evolve, but it does. You can take their terms and redefine it making it useless to them and valuable to you. EDIT: Toxic masculinity and rape culture being two examples that went the other way. Rape culture initially was discussing men being raped in prison. Toxic masculinity was a term which initially referred to how certain …
/r/MensRights24/02/20 07:02 PM
1

Made to penetrate is not counted as rape, so yes.
/r/MensRights24/02/20 05:23 AM
1

I'm not even sure that's legally possible. Sperm donors and minor victims of rape have been on hook for child support. She'd be taking a risk that you never fall into financial difficulty and require public assistance.
/r/MensRights24/02/20 05:19 AM
2

I also wonder why those who demand an exemption for victims of rape and incest don't demand the same exemptions in "pro choice" states. I've heard the feminist argument well even in states that believe that the fetus is a human life, it's so important to protect a rape victim that even an innocent life should be destroyed. If the blame falls on any one, it should be the rapist. Their concern for rape victims end when the rapist is female and the rape victim male. If you can kill an innocent to s…
/r/MensRights14/02/20 02:30 PM
7

This is why I think men should sue colleges for admission under Title IX. If colleges can be forced to have the same number proportional athletic opportunities for women, regardless of ability, based on enrollment colleges should also have the same proportion of admissions, regardless of ability, based on applications. Employment discrimination also covers hiring. Why shouldn't Title IX cover admissions? It's not an issue of affirmative action for men as many want to frame it,. It's an issue of …
/r/MensRights14/02/20 02:16 PM
6

OK, but why shouldn't this bill be criticised on the basis that men currently have no reproductive rights. It's not like she proposed free hysterectomies and vascetomies or birth control, including condoms, for people who didn't want children. She simply wants women to remain the only ones with reproductive rights.
/r/MensRights14/02/20 07:09 AM
7

Sure, but what reproductive rights has she proposed for men? Just necause she wants attention for another bill does not make this bill immune to criticism especially since men currently have no reproductive rights.
/r/MensRights14/02/20 07:00 AM
3

First, I was siding with him, but then I read the etiquette guy and he said it was OK to lean the chair back unless someone they were eating or someone was using a laptop or leaning forward, etc. Then I was siding with her. Then I read her follow up tweet about him actually getting a drink for the trouble and her being reprimanded. A recliner is intended to recline. A car is intended to move, but we do put restrictions on their use for the safety and comfort of all. There is a difference between…
/r/MensRights14/02/20 03:56 AM
3

They've licked their finger and have held it up to see which way the wind is blowing. They'll do this constantly to give Heard the maximum opportunity to remain. They'll cut ties with her only if this is protracted long enough to interfere with filming.
/r/MensRights13/02/20 11:20 PM
1

"a number of states have withdrawn their ratification. So if you count a latecomer on the plus side, how can you disregard states that said ‘we’ve changed our minds?’” I think she's correct here. IMO because of this "The ERA’s text, by contrast, does not mention a deadline. The deadline is mentioned in the resolution proposing the amendment, but not in the text of the amendment itself." and this "“Congress, possessing exclusive power over the amending process, cannot be bound by, and is under no…
/r/MensRights13/02/20 10:43 PM
7

When the "progressive" approach to crime is to only imprison males, anyone demanding that female murders and child rapists be imprisoned would be misogynists. Expecting women to be decent, responsible, human beings is now misogynist.
/r/MensRights13/02/20 10:20 PM
1

Well she did "successfully" (at least Harvard hasn't done anything about it) claim to be native American even though she might only be 1/1024th Native American. Legally, tiy have to be 25% Native American to claim native American status. That's probably a uniquely female thing too because she got more with less.
/r/MensRights09/02/20 05:38 PM
2

"The letter states cases of alleged sexual misconduct should be treated equally." What madness is this? Hold women to the same standard as men. Madness I say. /s
/r/MensRights09/02/20 05:29 PM
2

Here's something to think about. What about drunk driving convictions? If a person can't consent to sex, why would they be able to consent to a police officer searching their vehicle, performing a breathalizer / sobriety test, etc?People, including women, are able to consent to everything except sex when they're drunk. Why was sex given this privileged place in the consent department? Obviously it was intended to advantage women and more to the point disadvantage men. If they cared about women, …
/r/MensRights09/02/20 05:13 PM
2

Just read the article. Amber Heard might lose her job because of "ongoing legal drama", but has no qualms about saying that she accused him of domestic abuse / violence.
/r/MensRights09/02/20 05:05 PM
10

Sad thing is if some one got toxic shock for using one, they'd probably blame the store for letting them steal it.
/r/MensRights09/02/20 01:47 AM
2

"being tall, rich, handsome, famous, 6 pack, and getting consent is not enough to ward of fake news allegations. " To be fair sometimes rich is enough to assure one.
/r/MensRights04/02/20 04:47 PM
1

Not just fellas. What implication could that have no abortion rights?
/r/MensRights31/01/20 11:44 PM
1

Every company I've worked for I've interviewed with HR prior to interviewing with the hiring manager even when that interview was a formality (ie when I was recommended by an employee) Their purpose was to ensure that a person was "not insane" as opposed to determining whether they were qualified for the position. Om the other hand, when I first started out 30 years ago, I sat in interviews and vendor meeting with my manager, who was not an IT person. It was odd how after we hired one female tec…
/r/MensRights27/01/20 03:52 AM
1

I can see the ad now. Wanted, token female board member to satisfy dumb a** legislation.
/r/MensRights27/01/20 03:39 AM
1

That's untrue. If a company is a public accommodation, they can't discriminate. A movie theater can't bar black people. The issue here probably has more to do with what race is a company? What gender is a company? Their clients technically aren't the board members of a company, but the company itself.
/r/MensRights27/01/20 03:27 AM
1

Do Asian companies really need Goldman Sachs to bring them public? Asia is a huge emerging market. I'm pretty sure Goldman Sachs needs them more than they need Goldman Sachs . So when are they going to change their name to Goldperson Sachs for diversity?
/r/MensRights27/01/20 03:20 AM
1

" The corporate board has become a rare bright spot for gender and racial diversity at the highest echelons of corporate America. Almost half of the open spots at S&P 500 companies went to women last year, and for the first time they made up more than a quarter of all directors. In July, the last all-male board in the S&P 500 appointed a woman. " " Still, new boards are less diverse: Among the top 25 IPOs by value each year from 2014 through 2018, 10 companies had no female directors, said Malli…
/r/MensRights27/01/20 03:15 AM
2

Your argument is not reality. I don't think that's true. Don't lower court rulings take affect unless they're over turned or are stayed? I don't see where he issued a stay. Still, if it's binding in his district, why would men in his district be punished for a law that was found to be unconstitutional in his district? My understanding is a ruling is binding unless overturned by a higher court. You're suggesting that no lower court rulings should have any affect because they might be over turned …
/r/MensRights27/01/20 02:10 AM
1

Based on the way the story was written it doesn't look like she was charged with the first one until after she committed the second one. That begs the question of whether she would have been charged with the first one at all had she not committed the second one. It's also important to point out that these things are not "one offs" as is often claimed by people who don't want false rape accusers (and it also only the ones who falsely accuse someone of rape. No other false accusation of a crimes g…
/r/MensRights26/01/20 08:31 PM
2

But remember, MRAs don't do any real activism. /s
/r/MensRights24/01/20 05:59 AM
9

White privilege is one of the most racist concepts around because that it implies the only places that matter are North America and Europe. Most countries in the world are run by minorities. China's economy is as large as the United States' economy.
/r/MensRights22/01/20 07:23 PM
1

"in order to ensure sufficient quantities of sperm with desired qualities.” " This is the weakness in the argument. Normally if we talk about donations, we're simply looking at something that works. Is the heart compatible? With sperm they want the recipient to be able to choose eugenics. I can't say I don't want a black person's blood, but they want to be able to say I don't want a black persons sperm. If the argument is that it should be treated like other donations, then it should be treated …
/r/MensRights21/01/20 06:38 PM
1

Wait, Jess Phillips said that a woman can't be elected if a man is running. That's sexist so why hasn't the "feminist internet" jumped all over her?
/r/MensRights21/01/20 06:25 PM
3

Because women have actual jobs now. http://archive.is/px9qV
/r/MensRights19/01/20 03:06 PM
1

Because the man knows women get get treated well ion society and the woman knows men get treated like crap. The man in a room full of women knows some one made a mistake and he's going to have an easy time. The woman in a room full of men knows someone made a mistake and she's going to be treated like a man, like crap.
/r/MensRights17/01/20 04:46 AM
1

This is why I wonder about those who criticism the use of The Daily Mail because it's not a "credible" news source. Many main stream news sources seem to operate more like unregulated PACs or agenda driven activists than unbiased news organizations.
/r/MensRights17/01/20 04:24 AM
1

The woman who claimed to be native American to (probably) get an advantage at Harvard. She's shown that she's not above "stretching the truth" if it helps her.
/r/MensRights17/01/20 04:21 AM
3

Wouldn't that largely depend on CNN's track record? So you're saying they didn't buy into that whole MeToo unsubstantiated accusations are true / believe women ideology? EDIT: Other posters have pointed out that the evidence that does exist seems to refute Warren's contention and supports Sander's position. Take into consideration that CNN is supposedly a news organization and so would be held to a high standard of journalist integrity. I don't mean this to be mean nor do I want it to sound like…
/r/MensRights15/01/20 01:13 PM
1

News organizations at least on the right are expected to substantiate a story before reporting it otherwise the main stream media labels it as fake news.
/r/MensRights15/01/20 12:56 PM
5

This is a tactic I've found to be exclusively employed by female rapists. I know of no credible case where a male rapist has claimed to have been the one raped by a female victim. (There is a prison rape case where it might have occurred based on her account, but the prison sided with the male inmate over the female prison guard. I don't see it as credible, but possible). Yet in Israel feminists have fought to prevent men from charging women with rape for fear that a rapist will charge his victi…
/r/MensRights06/01/20 02:00 PM
15

Besides the fact she plied them with alcohol and drugs.
/r/MensRights06/01/20 04:31 AM
12

Did you notuce "Cyprus has the E.U.’s highest rate of reporting sexual violence to the police, yet experts say that the conviction rate in such cases is low, and that women are often not taken seriously by the authorities. " That proves what I've been saying all along. Rape shield laws, reductions in the rights of the accused, etc. don't encourage female rape victims to report. They encourage people to file false claims of rape. Female rape victims are deterred from reporting, but it's not by th…
/r/MensRights05/01/20 02:47 PM
1

Remember the female Kurdish fighters' claims that we don't need men to protect us. That sure changed quick when the U.S. pulled back our MALE (I'm sure it was at least 99% men if not 100%) soldiers.
/r/MensRights28/12/19 05:38 PM
1

"But Beijing suppresses #MeToo discussions online because it fears social movements it does not control " "it fears social movements it does not control ". That's exactly why feminists attack MRAs.
/r/MensRights28/12/19 05:31 PM
3

Feminists did question the shrinking gender life expectancy gap when it was initially reported in the U.S. They wondered why women didn't derive the same level of benefit as men even though both genders was an increase inb life expectancy. Funny thing was shortly after that I saw articles claiming euthanasia being a feminist issue because women lived longer than men and when their quality of life deteriorates, they may want to end it. Regardless of what happens women are oppressed.
/r/MensRights27/12/19 03:12 AM
3

I wasn't planning to watch it, but if the guardian doesn't like it, I think I'll give it a go.
/r/MensRights23/12/19 03:58 AM
-2

OK let me break it down into simpler chunks. First, I didn't accuse any one on this sub of only taking the man's side. I stated a fact. Being an MRA doesn't mean always taking the man's side. Some people who don't spend time on this sub don't understand that so it's well worth mentioning. Second, the examples given actually support my point. I mention my position " but I support fair laws and believe that laws should be enforced equally. That brought me to this article.". The beginning part expl…
/r/MensRights17/12/19 04:09 PM
4

That's why when there's a fire, we see women running to put out the flames and when there is a flood men are conspicuously absent among people piling the sandbags. Oh wait, that's not what we see at all. Women are "leading" from the comfort of their own homes.
/r/MensRights16/12/19 11:12 PM
2

Wouldn't it be IF it happens to them? instead of when it happens to them?
/r/MensRights16/12/19 10:55 PM
1

I've seen elections decided by 1 vote. They were much smaller, but when #1 Virginia was upset by a 16th seed, many sports columnists said it was bound to happen sometime. You just never know.
/r/MensRights16/12/19 06:08 PM
3

Others have already explained how absolutely no one could believe that what she did was an attempt to cheat the election. And yet, that's what the headline implies. It's absolutely an attempt to cheat the election. If 7 votes didn't matter, why would someone go door to door to get ONE vote? As I noted before, no one has credibly explained why she couldn't have given those vouchers away when it was legal to do so.
/r/MensRights16/12/19 06:05 PM
13

Logic, sense, truth and compassion be damned. Of course it;'s illogical to believe that someone should have to follow the law since she could have been compassionate a day before, but hey it's always compassion when you do something good so you get something out of it. /s
/r/MensRights16/12/19 10:01 AM
1

I had a discussion with HR and my boss about that. A job has to meet certain requirements for something to be salary. One is a minimum wage. 5 years ago the minimum wage where I'm at was $8.25 / hour. The minimum wage for salary was $22,00 / year pr I believe $35,000 a year. There's like a short and long test and for some weird reason they have different minimums and different requirements. At $22,000 and $8.25, it would have been 47 - 48 hours a week with over time.
/r/MensRights16/12/19 09:51 AM
9

I'm wondering how that relates to men's rights.
/r/MensRights16/12/19 07:48 AM
13

"She added: "That is the country we have become - thinking food parcels are a treat. " No, the country you've become is thinking that people only have to eat on polling day. It doesn't seem to be illegal if they were handed out the day before or the day after.
/r/MensRights16/12/19 07:38 AM
5

"The TV presenter's arrest has thrown ITV's first ever winter version of Love Island into doubt, with filming due to start in South Africa in January." Considering that no female "celebrity" with the singular exception of Asia Argento (She had her From Parts Unknown episodes pulled from Netflix at least for a time. I'm not sure if they're back.) has suffered even a slight setback to her career for abusing someone, If that's the case, I'm guessing it has more to do with them considering whether t…
/r/MensRights16/12/19 05:37 AM
14

Seriously, how can people believe the wage gap is sexism I don't think that they do. Most women choose the mommy track and they know the precise reasons they did so. Most women understand that plumbing isn't for them, but they agree to pay their plumber $300 to spend 20 minutes rodding out a drain. It become a pop culture thing like Santa Claus, but insidious and stupid. No one believes it, but most people pretend to. Santa at least is fun for the kids. The wage gap is just stupid. Maybe in the …
/r/MensRights16/12/19 04:55 AM
13

"the Promethean idea of the conquest of nature by man, in a world especially made for men." You're correct. That's absolutely the cause. Where Ms. Thunberg is misguided and so misleads people is that it is also the solution. No one wants to return to the days before medicine when life expectancy was about 30 years. We even demand children be vaccinated mow giving that whole circle of life the finger. Who cares that there are 8 billion people in the world already. The world is only 7% white and t…
/r/MensRights12/12/19 01:01 AM
-1

IMO she's right about the patriarchy (ie "toxic masculinity") causing the problems if I understand the traditional concepts of femininity and masculinity correctly. She's wrong about the solution being getting rid of "toxic masculinity". The solution is we need more of it. If I understand correctly, the feminine would require us to live in harmony with natures gentile balance. Masculinity subordinates nature to the will of man. I won't migrate to a warmer climate in the winter, I'm building a ho…
/r/MensRights12/12/19 12:00 AM
3

It's nice that she listed women she thought should have been nominated. "Harel went on to list a number of female filmmakers with "acclaimed works in 2019. The filmmaker tweeted: Lulu Wang Mati Diop Greta Gerwig Olivia Wilde Lorene Scafaria Marielle Heller Melina Matsoukas Chinonye Chukwu Céline Sciamma" The issue I have with that is she should know that there are only 5 nominations. If she really believes this, she should have had the courage to say which guy / guys should not have been given t…
/r/MensRights10/12/19 11:03 PM
11

Justify your existence? Funny, my mom would tell me that it was parents who had an obligation to their children because no one asks to be brought into this world.
/r/MensRights10/12/19 10:24 PM
5

And it works because Indiana Jones was always male. What I find interesting was the reaction to Hunger Games. I'm not a fan so have to go on what I've read. This is supposedly the demographic of the fan base. http://z2solutions.com/demographics/hunger-games-demographic-analysis/ What I find interesting is the race of one character, Jennifer Lawrence's, was changed. It's my understanding that in the book she was brown skinned. There seems to have been no fan backlash to the change in the casting.…
/r/MensRights09/12/19 05:45 PM
1

"Walton was not punished by the Kings or the NBA." Why should he have been?
/r/MensRights08/12/19 09:37 PM
1

I'm curious. Was the initial poster a male who never had a female partner enjoy sex with him or a female who never enjoyed sex? The implication is males enjoy sex and females don't.
/r/MensRights08/12/19 09:24 PM
5

"have yet to yield results so far." That sums up modern feminism at least in the U.S. The other 200 laws against pay inequity didn't solve the "gender wage gap", but if you pass this one it will. The other 100 programs to encourage girls to go into X (STEM, fire fighting, etc.) didn't fox the gap, but we know this 101rst one will (aside from the fact the STEM gap doesn't actually exist, but we'll continue to not include the social sciences). We know the 200 other laws / campaigns to address viol…
/r/MensRights08/12/19 05:19 PM
3

That's not what they were saying about Title IX though when people were concerned it would take money away from men's athletics. At that time, they said if a family was sitting at dinner and food was low, you wouldn't tell one person they couldn't eat so everyone else would get their fill. You would split what you had among everyone. It seems that they meant YOU not THEM. They would tell the boy he couldn't eat anything so they and the girl could have their fill.
/r/MensRights08/12/19 03:33 PM
4

To be fair, the 15 year old's victim was a boy so I don't know that it's as exculpatory of the judge's sexism as if he had raped a girl. There are studies that suggest that a victim's gender and race also affect the sentence. https://deathpenaltyinfo.org/news/study-in-oklahoma-race-and-gender-of-victim-significantly-affect-death-penalty
/r/MensRights07/12/19 08:28 PM
8

That's not what they're saying. They're saying we hate men. Not counting men who are raped by women as victims because of the way the law is written IS the criminal justice system hurting victims. Whether they intended to or not, they're saying that women raping men is not sexual violence. The only other interpretation is that there is no distinction between rape and what women who rape men would be charged under in both the criminal justice system and social services. That makes little sense co…
/r/MensRights07/12/19 07:52 PM
2

It was supposed to be sexist because a man gets a reward for gifting the exercise bike to his wife because he gets a sexoer wife. So what about every kiss begins with Kay. Wanting a sexier wife is sexist, but treating your wife / GF like a whore is OK?
/r/MensRights05/12/19 01:02 AM
4

"The woman, who is from Bowers Gifford, was arrested on suspicion of two counts of sexual assault and four counts of common assault. She remains in custody as enquiries continue.' " It's a good thing they're holding her pending an investigation. It's the UK. It's the only time she'll serve. I give even odds that the law changes to make it illegal for police to hold female offenders prior to trial though.
/r/MensRights05/12/19 12:54 AM
9

Actually it's legal in most places. California, New York City, and Miami Dade County being the exceptions.
/r/MensRights29/11/19 07:09 AM
6

Just want to verify it's a urologist and not an OBGYN. Because that sign could mean different things. It could mean that there are no male chaperones available and if you want one, it would be female. One reason why I declined surgery at a clinic was that there were four female workers with the male doctor. I was assured there would be at least 3 people in the operating room at all times when I was out, but because of the gender make up of the staff would not be assured that one would be male.
/r/MensRights28/11/19 06:08 PM
2

I wanted to keep this comment separate so just provided a link to the main post. It's not a criticism of the author. It's an expression of frustration with how society treats men. Even when someone works to get justice for men they feel the (I agree that there is a realistic possibility of experiencing severe backlash from feminists and regressives.) need to temper their support. Maybe we should change the law. It warrants serious consideraion. The law absolutely should be changed. It is morally…
/r/MensRights26/11/19 10:43 PM
25

I have a feeling that if men got pregnant instead of women, they would be drafted into pregnancy when there is insufficient population growth.
/r/MensRights26/11/19 10:16 PM
1

Where is it located? There is most likely a law against inciting violence.
/r/MensRights24/11/19 04:17 PM
7

It could be both. A few years back I read a couple articles by feminists complaining about the rise of dadvertising (presenting fathers in a positive light). I can't find those articles anymore. Huggies actually faced backlash a few years ago over their dad test commercial. It wasn't just fathers who complained. It was mothers too. It's progress when companies no longer view male bashing as a profit driver. Companies still cater to women and if companies have adopted that view, it's probably bec…
/r/MensRights24/11/19 12:20 AM
2

How long do you give it before she's claiming sexism for men no longer wanting to talk to her "off the record"?
/r/MensRights21/11/19 11:05 PM
10

I saw her game show once. She's a terrible game show host. Game shows most be a male genre too.
/r/MensRights19/11/19 12:16 AM
4

I'm guessing it's legal for adults to have sex in Kentucky so doesn't that conflict with the laws on rape by that logic?
/r/MensRights18/11/19 11:29 PM
6

According to Hillary Clinton the real dangerous and difficult work is having to get a real job after the fireman you were married to dies fighting a fire or something like that.
/r/MensRights18/11/19 11:17 PM
3

This is one of those rare ideas that discriminates against everyone. Why wouldn't they just put a port a potty there? Women could use it to and men would have privacy.
/r/MensRights17/11/19 05:10 PM
5

I would start another slack channel for men and if HR denied file a complaint with the EEOC and any other human rights government agencies that have jurisdiction. Most states and some cities have their own government agency. Even counties will sometimes have one. This way I would only have to win one. They would have to win all. Your question asked what I would do. I'm not saying you should do that. I happen to have one of those weird mindsets that can compartmentalize things. If you do, prepare…
/r/MensRights17/11/19 05:04 PM
1

I completely understand that. Do you understand that some infant ue the same as you that death is not the same as sterilization. What implication does that make for your argument? It's not harm, but intent? We should conflate MGM in the U.S. with NGN in Africa because they're not the same thing? Even when children in the U.S. die from circumcision, it's not as bad because there's an acceptable number. When you only compare it to the "successful" circumcisions, you're saying that the other ones d…
/r/MensRights12/11/19 08:33 PM
3

The biggest problem is where do you put the 90 % or so of accusations that can't be determined as either true or false? Eugene Kanin tried this by finding a police force that was required to close every case of rape. He found a false reporting rate of 41%. One of the arguments against the finding was because they were required to closes cases, police were aggressive in investigating a complaint as false leading to many incorrect findings of false accusations. The question in my mind is unless yo…
/r/MensRights12/11/19 08:04 PM
4

"More guys are realizing playing video games and focusing on their hobbies and jobs is more rewarding " In my 20s and early 30s, I used to get upset if some one got a promotion I thought I should have gotten. It was only in my mid 30s that I realized that it wasn't worth the hassle. I know a couple other guys who "stepped down" to take low paying non-management jobs. Almost every one goes through life believing that what they were taught will make them happy will make them happy. Many people com…
/r/MensRights12/11/19 12:20 AM
-3

Let me ask a few questions. Do you oppose medically unnecessary infant male circumcision? If you do, why? The reason I ask is because the argument I hear is the same argument I hear when MRAs talk about MGM in relation to FGM, they aren't comparable. Here's the thing. They're right and they're wrong, and they're really wrong. There are many types of FGM. One type is the removal of the clitoris and they're right. That would be like removing the penis. One type is the removal of the clitoral hood …
/r/MensRights12/11/19 12:02 AM
2

Why would it have to be the exactly the same? The similarities are sufficient. In both cases, people had unnecessary surgery without consent. In both cases, their bodies are permanently altered. People react as if circumcision causes no harm. People lose sensitivity. Sometimes "too much" (any amount is too much) is cut and the skin is tight That doesn't even count the penis amputations and HIV transfers.
/r/MensRights11/11/19 11:05 PM
2

Those gender studies majors can't get well paying jobs.
/r/MensRights11/11/19 05:05 PM
1

Wanna take bets the new leader is a woman?
/r/MensRights11/11/19 05:03 PM
2

It's only a problem if you think making some one else do the work you get paid to do is a problem. It probably would be as big an issue if they hired women who could actually program rather than to fill a quota because some idiot manager thought we need diversity at all costs.
/r/MensRights11/11/19 04:06 PM
5

Intersectional feminism is simply feminists continued desire to steal the victimhood of others for the gain of white women. It's no surprise that women's suffrage came after black men were given the right to vote and feminisms reawakening came after the civil rights movement. In Illinois there was a push to separate set asides for women and minorities after a study found that 90% of those set asides went to white women. Female supremacists hear minorities are being discriminated against and thin…
/r/MensRights11/11/19 12:34 AM
2

"I wonder if they use a persons individual income in determining their credit worthiness. " That's what I thought. Even Wozniak complaint wasn't about income. It was about assess. The other thing that comes to mind is that the algorithm is probably following the law and that's what's causing the disparity. When I bought my house, I was given 2 pre-approvals. My realtor asked which I wanted to go with. I took the lesser amount with the lower interest rate. He was like why? The other one is giving…
/r/MensRights11/11/19 12:21 AM
18

That was my thought. The problem is we know that it won't. "The court said the lodge had no overriding reasons for refusing to accept women members." They won't remove charitable status from men's shelters (if they exist), but will find "overriding reasons" to keep men out of women's only groups. When men bad is an "overriding reasons", it shouldn't be difficult.
/r/MensRights10/11/19 04:32 PM
11

I wish I was that optimistic. Unfortunately, there are people who have money to burn like the Hollywood set. I have no doubt that instead of putting money into worthwhile causes like cancer research, they'll simply "donate" it to feminists causes by creating flops.
/r/MensRights04/11/19 02:46 PM
2

Mother Jones (the standard often cited when determining whether something counts as a mass shooting) defined a mass shooting as 4 or more people killed with a gun in a single incident. This counts as a mass shooting. So why isn't it reported as such?
/r/MensRights02/11/19 10:41 PM
2

"Yes she screwed up. Big time. But we’re entering an age when people have pictures of their screw-ups. Are we going to make them all resign? " Since Molly Jong-Fast hadn't raised this question when men were being forced to resign for similar offenses, I guess the answer she expects is no, only the men.
/r/MensRights02/11/19 10:32 PM
2

"I've been commenting in them to try to get the OPs to at least explain their position, or why they feel it should be posted there, " Isn't that the purpose of the now required flair before something can be posted?
/r/MensRights02/11/19 05:06 PM
0

I've never been at that store, but have been in a few dressing rooms. I suspect there's a "common area" at the front of the dressing room and there's a mirror. The cubicals are probably farther back. The girl probably didn't bother to go into one of the cubicals. She may have had people with her and didn't think they could fit back there, but it could have simply been more convenient. My school has a wing on a floor with a gender neutral bathroom (a converted multi stall men's room) and a multi …
/r/MensRights02/11/19 05:04 PM
1

I disagree. The footballer definitely has a complaint. There are several reasons for that not all of them being particularly relevant to this post, which essentially is if you demand the law be enforced when it hasn't actually been broken, you should demand that it be enforced when it has. Now to get to other points. Reporters and cameras shouldn't be in the locker room at all. Many municipalities ban the use of recording devices in locker rooms / rest rooms entirely. It could be a violation of …
/r/MensRights02/11/19 04:46 PM
3

Are women really being pushed into prostitution or is prostitution simply an employment option women have that men in similar financial difficulty do not?
/r/MensRights02/11/19 03:22 AM
15

I'm pretty sure that it's men's independence they're worried about.
/r/MensRights02/11/19 02:53 AM
2

Contact 1in6 and see if you can get a bunch of blue strings to hand out and wear. When they ask, tell them what it's for.
/r/MensRights01/11/19 01:38 AM
1

This doesn't surprise me. Every sexual harassment awareness training I've been in for an employer (I haven't been in one for college) has that it doesn't matter what the gender of the perpetrator and victim is slide(s). I usually see it there. IMO, it's simply HR checking off a box so if any man complains they can say we told people it didn't matter if your victim was male. I'm not a big believer in policing a persons thoughts and don't really care if a company treats a person fairly because the…
/r/MensRights01/11/19 01:23 AM
179

Equality feels like oppression to those who have privilege.
/r/MensRights01/11/19 01:08 AM
3

That whole filtration system thing is BS. That was supposedly the reason why high school boys swam nude in the Midwest until the early 80s. They didn't have an issue with the filtration system when the girls swam in swimsuits.
/r/MensRights01/11/19 01:03 AM
2

IDK Katie Hill and Zoe Quinn proved less isn't always better.
/r/MensRights01/11/19 12:51 AM
3

If no men are interested then fine, no men’s swim time. I disagree. There should be a comparable men's only time unless ALL the men in that area specifically state that they don't want one and it should last only until the time when even a single guy says he wants one. They shouldn't have to fight being discriminated against when it's already illegal.
/r/MensRights01/11/19 12:45 AM
5

I don't think that there needs to be an expressed interest in a men's only swim time. If there is a women's only swim time, there should be a men's only swim time even if it goes unused or is extremely under utilized. There are some men who might want a men's only time, but don't feel they can ask for one. Beyond that, there are issues of capacity and fairness. For example, the free weight area of a gym. There might be 6 guys and 2 women there at a given time and your waiting to take your turn. …
/r/MensRights01/11/19 12:40 AM
2

I suspect as much. I'm just concerned that this is one of those tough sentences that aren't really going to be tough. I remember a case (not the specific charge) where a judge gave the female defendant a sentence of 1 to 20 years. It was reported as a sentence of 20 years, but I was like wait. She's eligible for parole in a year. I suspected the judge set up the sentence so he could claim he was tough on crime, but someone else could let her go in a year or two.
/r/MensRights31/10/19 03:03 AM
14

It seems she got sentenced to a mental hospital rather than a prison. What happens when she's "cured"? She wasn't found not guilty, but can they hold you in a "mental facility" if you're no longer suffering from a mental defect?
/r/MensRights30/10/19 09:53 PM
3

“When Hill engaged in an affair with a campaign aide, she did not do so in the context of millennia of men’s sexual violence against women.” Assuming that's true, why would that make a difference? When a woman is executed, should we admonish death penalty opponents to look at it in the context of men having for millennia being almost exclusively the people executed?
/r/MensRights30/10/19 02:55 PM
7

She doesn't believe that financial stress can result in increased DV? She's supposed to be a psychologist? Police are more likely to arrest a male offender and men are less likely to report. When men do report to DV hotlines, they're most likely to be considered offenders so would these organizations even count their calls as victims? She also makes an assumption that it's the man who always starts reciprocal DV when in fact it's mostly women.
/r/MensRights30/10/19 02:28 PM
1

I admit I've never been black and had people run from me before. I'm half Asian though and have been "jumped" for it. Not just in white neighborhoods either in black neighborhoods as well. Hell, I've gotten into fights in Asian clubs because I'm half white. News flash racism is not something exclusive to whites. White people are just the only people Michelle Obama will give sh*t for it. If having people run from her is the only issue she's had it's a function of female privilege. She doesn't rea…
/r/MensRights30/10/19 01:55 PM
0

They have a point. I just don't see how this is different from Facebook hosting unverified, fake, news. It seems another example of the double standards of the regressive left which is not based on principles of freedom of speech, but rather whether that speech advances a political narrative that they support.
/r/MensRights29/10/19 11:00 AM
1

Also, if you don;t look at a companies' profitability over time and it's corresponding management make up, you don't get a true picture of the impact if any women had on a company. Some companies have heavy start up costs like technology companies, movie production companies, pharmaceutical, etc., but after the initial cost, they derive profit even if it's a small residual. How would they control for that? Microsoft may spend $1 billion developing a new operating system this year, but earn $300 …
/r/MensRights28/10/19 03:24 AM
2

"Championing women’s equality at work leads to... Better corporate performance and stability. Companies in the top quartile for gender diversity are 15% more likely to have financial returns above the median for their respective national industry. " I wonder why they didn't just look at who had the highest average returns in the industry. There are two distinct strategies for retirement, the eat well and sleep well strategies. The eat well strategies tend to have more risk, but generate higher r…
/r/MensRights27/10/19 10:50 PM
3

There's no way he can be right. It's always OK for a woman to sexually assault a man. If it wasn't, wouldn't they face actual consequences other than people telling them they were naughty? /s
/r/MensRights26/10/19 07:54 PM
2

“Our typical approach as Equity programs … is, when someone does something that’s micro-aggressive … hurtful, or offensive to you, the best approach typically is to inquire, ask questions, assume good intentions and approach it with humility,” he said. “Typically that’s done best face-to-face. That was not done in this situation.” That's why they decided to put up a sign with no context rather than discuss whatever situation there was with the person involved. It might have been excusable or exp…
/r/MensRights26/10/19 04:48 AM
0

If you asked people in the U.S. who is the U. S. biggest threat, the answers would undoubtedly be Russia and China with North Korea and Iran coming in next. From what I've read, ISIS is a radical off shoot of Sunni Islam. They view Shiites as heretics. The "bedrock" of Shia Islam is Iran. Even though the majority of Syria is Sunni, the government of Assad is dominated by an off shoot of Shia Islam. I've read that Turkey recently has been less than a true friend to the U.S. and the government in …
/r/MensRights25/10/19 04:20 PM
1

I think those reporters shouldn't be in the locker room in the first place. It's worse that they were in an opposite gender locker room and not actually interviewing any one.
/r/MensRights23/10/19 10:58 PM
2

They would never put a time limit on establishing paternity as it relates to collecting child support.
/r/MensRights23/10/19 10:55 PM
3

I suspect that he worked out child support and visitation with the mother and not through the courts. I don't blame him. He believed he was legally the father since he thought he was on the birth certificate and it seems at least initially, the relationship with the mother was amicable.
/r/MensRights23/10/19 08:35 PM
9

She's a researcher. I'm baffled how a researcher can understandably misinterpret a term that's central to the point they're trying to make. She doesn't seem to have even bothered to check the details of the case and that's being charitable. It would be worse if she did look into it and was deliberately dishonest. I'm not a researcher or an author, but you would think unnatural acts could include bestiality and necrophilia and it was probably worth looking into the details. As it turns out, she b…
/r/MensRights23/10/19 04:42 PM
9

"The US edition of Oxford-educated author Naomi Wolf’s new book Outrages is being pulped after a number of major errors were discovered. Outrages: Sex, Censorship, and the Criminalisation of Love is based on a PhD thesis that Wolf wrote in 2015" They should probably check to see if her thesis was inaccurate as well. They might want to look at who reviewed it as well.
/r/MensRights23/10/19 04:32 PM
1

Probably. Women aren't supposed to get prison sentences according to judicial guidelines.
/r/MensRights22/10/19 09:07 PM
2

The thing that baffles me is her claim that it's hard to adjust to life in the spotlight, but she's an actress. Wasn't she already in the spotlight?
/r/MensRights20/10/19 03:01 AM
3

Let me point out again that feminists in Israel don't want to allow men to charge women with rape because they believe that men will falsely accuse women of rape as a defense to having raped them. I don't know of a single instance where that has happened. There have been a hand full of women who have done that. This being an example. If anything, women shouldn't be able to charge men with rape because women will accuse a person they raped of raping them as a defense to rape.
/r/MensRights19/10/19 06:14 AM
6

He won't have to pay child support in the traditional sense because she's in prison, but if he chooses to raise the child and it looks like he has, he'll have to support the child "entirely" because she's not paying any support from prison.
/r/MensRights19/10/19 06:08 AM
1

So what do you do if she still loses?
/r/MensRights17/10/19 06:17 PM
1

To me it seems more anti-feminist than MRA. If it were her dad, you'd hear feminists raging against patriarchal sentiments. It would be more MRA if he were talking to his accountant about how marrying her would impact his finances.
/r/MensRights17/10/19 06:12 PM
1

I suspect it's more dangerous to the MSM's ability to control the narrative.
/r/MensRights17/10/19 05:51 PM
2

"They publish racist content " How is disparaging white people not racist? That's what the MSM sources regularly do. How is disparaging men not sexist? No MSM outlet has pointed out that white men are 3 times more likely to be killed by police than black women except Fox News. I can't remember which NBC news anchor was demoted to MSNBC because he said he was in a black hawk helicopter that took fire when in fact he wasn't. There was also an MSM reporter who reviewed movies / plays they never saw…
/r/MensRights17/10/19 05:45 PM
3

How many main stream media sources still refer to the thoroughly debunked "wage gap"? Donna Brazile, of CNN, leaked debate questions to Hillary Clinton. Most recently ABC showed footage from a gun show in Kentucky and passed it off as footage from Northern Syria.
/r/MensRights17/10/19 01:16 AM
2

COLLEGE POINT, QUEENS — The College Point homeless shelter will open this week as a women's-only facility, officials said Monday. The 200-bed shelter at 127-03 20th Ave. is scheduled to open Oct. 2, according to a spokesperson for State Sen. John Liu. Originally slated to house single men and open in September, the shelter has drawn heated objections from College Point residents and elected officials ever since the city's Department of Homeless Services announced the plan in late 2018. Residents…
/r/MensRights16/10/19 10:11 PM
1

You'll know when you see it. Complain, point things out, ask questions, direct your dollars to businesses that are MRA friendly or divert them from business that aren't. Educate yourself with the law. For example at work men were not allowed to wear sweaters, but women were. One day, I purposely wore a sweater because I wanted to be told that I couldn't this way I would have cause of action. Be careful, you don't want to get yourself fired. At the time, I'd been there for 10 -15 years and got th…
/r/MensRights16/10/19 03:54 PM
8

My issue with climate change is that everyone knows about it, but no one wants to change. Megan and Harry, two of the biggest climate change proponents, took like 7 private jets over a coup;e weeks. Of course Elton John bought carbon credits to "offset" it. That doesn't take any carbon out of the air and does jack for the environment. It's just a way for the privileged wealthy to virtue signal and give Al Gore a few bucks for the idea. I saw a segment on the news that Iceland was actually doing …
/r/MensRights12/10/19 03:03 AM
2

" At least 13 women have died " " Only four of the 13 recovered bodies have been identified by surviving family members, including that of a 12-year-old girl. " I'm pretty sure they didn't count 12 year olds as women when the covered Epstein.
/r/MensRights10/10/19 12:01 AM
7

I would have given up my seat if there was another available depending on the age of the kid and how far away the other seat was. Not for the mom, but for the kid. Now if there were no other seat available, I would expect the mom to stand near her kid. It makes no difference to the child whether her mom is sitting or standing. I wouldn't give up my seat. Same if the child was older, say older than 10. If the mom were far away and they couldn't easily see each other or talk and the child was youn…
/r/MensRights08/10/19 09:56 PM
5

If rape culture is the recusing, erasing, and minimizing of rape; there is only one real rape culture in Western society. It's the only rape that feminists do not oppose, female perpetrated rape. Look at the FBI definition of rape which requires penetration. It erases 90% of male victims as well as 99% of female perpetrators. Look at PREA and their preoccupation with classifying rape as willing and unwilling which minimizes (mostly male victims of female staff) rape by suggesting it was not real…
/r/MensRights08/10/19 08:20 PM
10

There was a study that found that men who ejaculated 21 or more times a month cut their cancer risk. So men should be provided prostitutes or sex bots by their employer's health insurance and should get paid time off to utilize tit.
/r/MensRights08/10/19 06:40 AM
2

A study carried out by researchers at the University of Houston has discovered that men and women agree on what constitutes harassment. Professor Leanne Atwater, who led the study, said that the research disproves the idea that “men don’t know their behaviour is bad and that women are making a mountain out of a molehill”. That doesn't always mean there won't be a misunderstanding. Before they had that whole you need a subscription to comment, we had an interesting discussion on GMP about that. B…
/r/MensRights07/10/19 11:12 PM
3

the best case is that the pool of applicants who were men is consistently stronger than the pool of applicants who are women. This is probably the case. Last I checked, boys scored consistently higher on the SAT, but more girls took it. The take away was that there was a group of boys at the bottom who didn't even try to take the SAT or go to college.
/r/MensRights07/10/19 10:28 PM
3

If you add 6.3 and 31.5 you get 37.8. 6.3/37.8 should represent the population of women in prison and 31.5/37.8 the population of men in prison. You would expect about 15% of the prison population would be women. That's only about a third of what it is.
/r/MensRights07/10/19 10:17 PM
5

Her point is that men and women are suicidal in different ways but at similar rates. I disagree. Her point is when MRAs talk about men being the biggest victims of suicide, it's false. Men are the biggest victims of suicide period. Of this there is no question. She tries to obfuscate it by talking about suicide attempts. Now let's talk about your statement " men and women are suicidal in different ways " Where does she say that? From the article, "a fifth of 17- 19-year-old girls, versus one in …
/r/MensRights07/10/19 05:55 PM
14

"Academically, girls outperform boys by a wide margin. Nationally, 70 percent of high-school valedictorians are girls. According to the College Board, girls account for 60 percent of all high-school students with A or A-plus averages despite taking harder classes than boys, even in math and science. " Much of that grade is subjective. What are the "class participation points"? Look at objective, machine, graded, tests like the SAT. high school boys outperformed girls on the 2016 SAT math test wi…
/r/MensRights07/10/19 04:06 PM
5

until she was 17 There is a difference between Weinstein and Epstein. Keep in mind 17 was when it stopped, not when it started.
/r/MensRights07/10/19 03:58 PM
1

That's still the decision maker though. I will concede that women make most of the purchasing decisions, but that is probably more to do with most brands / products being things people don't give a sh*t about so the decision defaults to the person buying the product, but in cases where there is a strong preference for a particular product within a household, that will probably prevail. For example I prefer drinking colas for soda. I don't care if it's Coke, Pepsi, or RC. I buy what's on sale. If…
/r/MensRights06/10/19 10:04 PM
1

I'm too lazy to link, but this happened not too long ago. In an X-Men poster Apocalypse was choking Mystique.. Feminists had a cow. Before then there was the cover of the Bat Man comic honoring the anniversary of the Killing Joke comic. Feminists threw a fit because it depicted some DV thing between Joker and Batgirl.
/r/MensRights06/10/19 09:49 PM
7

They complain, but they sustain the cost difference!!! Because femininity so fragile.
/r/MensRights06/10/19 02:46 PM
1

That's BS. I went through this with some morons attacking Lavar Ball for telling Christine Lahey to stay in her lane when she was suggesting he needs to appeal to women to grow his business and he said he was a men's apparel company. Good marketing professionals don't give a fig who makes the money. They also don't care about who spends it. They care about who makes the decision. In Ball's case, it's the teenage boy / young man. I've never known of a boy who asked his mom for a Bulls jersey and …
/r/MensRights06/10/19 02:24 PM
3

Self harm actually does indicate that girls are suffering from depression so I wouldn't really question the self report. I'm also not saying that we shouldn't help girls. I do agree though that if every article / discussion that talks about rape / DV has to have a "disclaimer" that says that it's not intended to take the "focus" off of women because they assume that women are more affected (I'm not convinced), they should have a similar "disclaimer" in articles / discussions in articles discussi…
/r/MensRights06/10/19 02:11 PM
3

I wondered how many guys she actually messaged. I wouldn't be surprised if she messaged 11 guys and was upset because one didn't message her back.
/r/MensRights05/10/19 02:22 AM
15

I imagine a different ending to her scenario. It lasts until their water stops flowing, their garbage isn't picked up, their lights don't come on, etc. Then they demand patriarchy come back. Of course the more likely scenario is the women realize that they have to do their own killing and since that's actually work, it never happens.
/r/MensRights05/10/19 01:34 AM
3

So is truth and empirical evidence apparently.
/r/MensRights04/10/19 04:24 PM
2

People probably realized that it was a charity that didn't actually do anything. They raised an issue of something (men's violence against women) they claimed was so pervasive in society that no one would know it was happening unless they raised awareness of it or something like that. "White Ribbon Australia declared the charity held an “agnostic” on abortion, igniting harsh criticism. A day after the announcement, the then CEO to issued a retraction of the position. " Because it's not about wha…
/r/MensRights04/10/19 12:11 AM
2

My guess is they'll remain silent. In my experience, feminism has always been about white women as a class. They have no issues "sacrificing" an individual women especially if they have insufficient privilege or every POC to maintain privilege for white women as a class.
/r/MensRights04/10/19 12:02 AM
2

That's probably with parole. Her sentence was 10 years so she';s eligible for parole in 5.
/r/MensRights03/10/19 11:32 PM
4

You know why it's hard for them to define misogyny? It's because they want to define it as what it has come to mean or what they'd lkike it to mean, but the world hasn't become sexist enough to accept that it's current usage means anything a man does or fails to do that a woman either doesn't like or doesn't benefit her to a greater extent than it does him.
/r/MensRights29/09/19 10:10 PM
105

No one owes you a child.
/r/MensRights29/09/19 09:27 PM
5

The thought passed my mind when I was looking at the story of the cheerleader accused of killing her baby. Among other things, I considered how society treats women facing difficult situations and how it treats men. Women who don't want a child can abstain from sex or use birth control often subsidized (the ACA requires it so it has the strength of law). When a women becomes pregnant, she has the option of abortion, adoption, or even legally abandoning her child (safe haven). that kind of shows …
/r/MensRights28/09/19 12:02 AM
3

From the article. "Amber reportedly donated half of her $7 Million divorce settlement with Johnny Depp to the ACLU " They're also in possible deep sh*t. " Also, the crux of this case revolves around Amber's op-ed in the Washington Post where she seemingly calls Depp a wife-beater.The ACLU posted the article on it's website and worked, in some form, with Amber in making the public statement. Our sources say, Depp's team is actually considering adding the ACLU as a defendant in the case for its co…
/r/MensRights17/09/19 11:46 PM
1

I don't mind them complaining. I'm not sure it was sexist if they put the names over the wrong faces. It was probably just sloppy.
/r/MensRights09/09/19 12:23 AM
3

First, men are objectified more than women. You're talking about sexual objectification in particular so be specific. How many people cheer when they see a crushing tackle only to recognize that it was a person hit when that guy doesn't get up?
/r/MensRights08/09/19 06:14 AM
8

Men also work longer hours and they do more of the risky work. When I read the thing about the female coder, the thing that popped into my head was diversity hire. I bet they hired her because they needed a woman on the team per upper level management. I bet they just got tired pretending she was hired to actually do the job she was hired to do. I work in IT. Even there most of the "heavy lifting" (the real technical stuff) is done by the men. Most of the women are in some kind of design or mana…
/r/MensRights07/09/19 02:59 AM
1

PREA already draws a strange distinction I've not seen in any other instance, willing and unwilling rape. They probably dud that when they found out staff committed roughly 50% or rapes and about 80% of staff rapists were women.
/r/MensRights04/09/19 03:14 PM
4

“Our council deserves to be applauded, not penalised,” Wrong, you should be punished more because if everybody else could find enough qualified men to have at least 40% male representation in senior positions, it should have been easy for you.
/r/MensRights04/09/19 03:07 PM
1

Except she was already on probation. Probation becomes meaningless if you can violate it and still not go to prison.
/r/MensRights02/09/19 04:36 PM
2

I'm more interested to see if the teachers cared since they were told it negatively affects boys.
/r/MensRights02/09/19 04:33 PM
2

"He said Smith was dealing with 'difficult family circumstances' as a mother of three children and the legal guardian of a fourth. " If women caring for children constitutes a difficult family circumstance, shouldn't fathers get custody in divorce cases by default?
/r/MensRights01/09/19 07:10 PM
1

IDK. The best "conspiracy theory" I've heard was that he killed himself because he found out he was played. She talked him into spending 90% of his disposable assets to settle a suit against her then found out she had a dude on the side. The guy she was spotted with like a week after his suicide.
/r/MensRights01/09/19 04:48 PM
6

Survivors? What did they survive if you haven't proven the allegations true? On the other hand, I survived seeing Zoe Quinn's nudes.
/r/MensRights30/08/19 03:44 AM
1

Most children are primarily raised by their mothers so wouldn't that be the other way around?
/r/MensRights29/08/19 06:29 PM
8

Her locker room will be closed to the media for one.
/r/MensRights29/08/19 03:56 PM
7

There was in college. She kicked extra points. The thing is in college you could carry three kickers. Before that there was a college that tried a female kicker on kick offs. They told her to run off the field after kicking off. It then became 10 against 11. I guess after the first kick off return for a touchdown, no other colleges decided to do it.
/r/MensRights29/08/19 03:56 PM
3

IDK if it's right, but I had to up vote that just for the balls of it. I think it would be more appropriate to put that on a feminist twitter that posted something similar. Not all black people are feminists.
/r/MensRights29/08/19 03:28 PM
3

This probably won't be popular, but we have to be careful where we draw the line so we don't become the feminists. If I don't support a women's only ride share because of a woman's unfounded fear of being raped, how can I support not hiring women because of an unfounded fear of being falsely accused. I say unfounded because most people won't rape some one and most people won't ruin another person's life because it's easier than work. There are a**holes, but most people are OK. Where I disagree w…
/r/MensRights29/08/19 03:09 PM
10

Thanks, that answers my question about whether they controlled for gender bias. They didn't. I would have been more illuminating to know if the same behaviors were viewed as sexual harassment based on the genders of the "victim" and "perpetrator".It's been my experience that especially women believe that's true.
/r/MensRights29/08/19 02:20 PM
27

How about “they’re scared of being falsely accused”? That would be too obvious. I have to wonder about the mind set of feminists though. Do they really have that dim a view of women to believe that men would only hire them to fulfill some sexual role? Businesses still have to get things done. Is she suggesting that men are doing 95% of the work because X number of women are only there to provide a sexual diversion? I also wonder how many men have fallen into that do as I say not as I do trap. I'…
/r/MensRights29/08/19 02:14 PM
5

I would love to see how they controlled for gender bias. If I remember correctly, there was a reasonable man and reasonable woman standard when it came to sexual harassment. Essentially it allowed women to get away with more egregious behavior. A woman placing her hand on a man's shoulder is platonic touch. A man placing his hand on a woman's shoulder is sexual harassment.
/r/MensRights29/08/19 01:59 PM
7

She also said under oath that he didn't rape her. It was regret rape. She regretted signing the contract with him so she accused him of rape.
/r/MensRights29/08/19 01:37 AM
3

That's not the highest number. It ranges all the way to 91%. I suspect that "study" simply "flipped" it and said anything not proven true is counted as false, which is probably more accurate based on our legal system where one has to be proven guilty. Eugene Kanin's study, which is IMO the most "credible" high end study put it at 41% The McDonald study found it to be like 50% (sorry don't remember the researchers first name). If I remember correctly the military also did a study that found it ar…
/r/MensRights28/08/19 09:51 PM
1

I agree. He was threatened with 40 years in prison and didn't think he'd get a fair shot that's why he took the deal. That's why I prefaced it with legally. The prosecutors railroaded an innocent boy with no physical evidence, but since they can also legally lie probably told him they had. The issue is that unless he could prove prosecution misconduct, he can't sue and even then they have some immunity. On this we agree. The law sometimes sucks balls, but we're stuck with it's limitations.
/r/MensRights27/08/19 12:26 AM
-15

"Respect men". Are you kidding, men already have respect in society? Ok, so it should be easy for you.
/r/MensRights26/08/19 06:07 PM
2

Understandable. That's why I wonder how many feminists there truly are. There are people who realize they have to speak a certain way in public. Some are virtue signaling for the pats on the head. I think others might be just trying to get by.
/r/MensRights26/08/19 05:29 PM
2

IDK, why do they mutilate them when they are infants? They do it as fast as possible before any one has a chance to complain. The boy grows up thinking that this is normal. In Africa they may get away with circumcising 20 year old men against their will. In the U. S., I'm guessing, it would be a sh*t ton harder and there would be a lot of lawsuits.
/r/MensRights26/08/19 05:25 PM
2

I guess what I'm saying is that I don't see how it is possible to correct it Sorry to hear you went through what you did. I don't think it is, but how many crimes are? The woman who was brutalized i in the central park 5 case was given a promotion if I recall correctly. If his accuser had money, I think it would be different (She got a couple million from the school system over it, but squandered it). The prosecutors didn't do anything wrong (legally, but there are some who believe that we shoul…
/r/MensRights26/08/19 05:19 PM
2

Rarely? I've never actually heard of a single provable incident of an adult man ever filing a false rape charge against a woman for raping him. There have been 1 or 2 incidents of men falsely claiming that a woman has raped a child. I got into it with one of those wehuntedthemammoth idiots. He asserted men have falsely accused women of raping them. I'm like name an incidence. He's like search for it. I'm not doing your work for you. Of course, I told him that I didn't ask him to. I'm asking him …
/r/MensRights26/08/19 11:06 AM
2

One issue is that when it's taken away by the state, it's because there is no father available. The father is more likely to file for child support. States love taxes and they fund the foster care system through it. If child support funded the foster care system, they might not be able to collect the tax. In Chicago there was an issue with airplane nois so they passed a surcharge on airplane tickets to sound proof a few homes in the immediate vicinity of the airports. Those got sound proofed in …
/r/MensRights26/08/19 10:31 AM
24

I don't believe your going to get that. The founder of good men project believed that men simply telling their stories would change the world. In a sense, he and you are right. Putting a face on a problem makes it more real for people. We see that with stories of homeless men. A story hits the news, people chip in and buy him a home. We see that with stories like Brian Banks. An injustice is committed against a man, it catches the public eye. People move to try and correct it. There is story aft…
/r/MensRights26/08/19 10:20 AM
1

I disagree, but I wonder what the sub would think if the sign were on the inside. Would that mean something different and be more palatable? Keeping in mind that you would only see it after you entered, would it be more of a reminder to moms who are already inside that the lounge is for all members of the family?
/r/MensRights25/08/19 05:00 PM
14

#believewomen (don't believe your eyes, ears, brain's cognitive functions, etc). /s
/r/MensRights25/08/19 04:49 PM
2

I can see if now. Women are the biggest victims of DV against men because when she hits her man, she might hurt her hand.
/r/MensRights25/08/19 04:27 PM
10

When you're paid to have sex, especially on camera, falsely accusing someone of rape might nor be the best career move.
/r/MensRights25/08/19 04:08 PM
15

I don't have an issue with people doing things for others. I have an issue when some one thinks the other person owes them because of gender. As far as it being characterized as noble, I don't care either way. I agree that if this is noble, then what you propose should be noble as well. At my job, we had happy Friday. Every Friday they would serve a breakfast treat, bagels or doughnuts. There were some guys who would eat the bagels, but not the doughnuts because of health. I would eat the doughn…
/r/MensRights25/08/19 04:04 PM
1

Get this thru your thick, selective rage crusading head......its a private business. THEY set the rules and policies, YOU follow them. Get this threw your sexist, pea brained, head. Business operate in society. They operate under the rules of society. They can set their rules, but if they clash with law, law wins every time all the time.
/r/MensRights24/08/19 10:16 PM
3

"So: how to attack the core?" First, you challenge the definition. Many feminists claim that they're for equality. They point to the dictionary definition. The issue is that the dictionary definition of feminism uses the feminist definition of equality a definition it does not use anywhere else. It would be like using the white supremacist definition of racial justice in their definition. How do you do that? Well, everyone knows the real definition of equality. Point out instances where they adv…
/r/MensRights24/08/19 04:28 PM
8

Another first for women.
/r/MensRights24/08/19 03:06 PM
4

I know what you're saying. I'm pointing out that you're flat out wrong. Whether it's malicious or not, I suspect the not caring that when men are raped it doesn't count as rape, is a strong indication of the answer.
/r/MensRights24/08/19 03:00 PM
3

So you're suggesting that opposing negative media portrayals isn't worth while? Is that just for men or does that apply to women as well? As far as the two articles criticizing feminists, wouldn't that depend on what the criticism was? There's a difference between "the ten hottest feminist babes" and feminists are completely wrong for opposing the repeal of the unrebuttable presumption os paternity in a marriage. As far as how many women rape men, that's actually a very big topic on this sub as …
/r/MensRights24/08/19 01:14 PM
5

I’m sorry, but it’s the Feminist that are fighting against Toxic Masculinity, which is the most armful thing to men in this society. Wow, I've never seen any feminists tell men to quit energy exploration or construction or any other dangerous trade that keeps society moving. They should be telling men to quit because it's "toxic masculinity" for men to risk their lives for a higher pay check because men are valued for money in this society. There was a college in Canada about 7 years ago. Some p…
/r/MensRights24/08/19 01:00 PM
6

The rest is actually critizing feminists for not doing anything about men’s condition Untrue, feminists get criticized FOR doing something about men's conditions. When feminists take on men's conditions it's almost entirely to the detriment of men. For example, the Michigan chapter of NOW opposed changing the unrebuttable presumption of paternity for children born to a married woman. Feminists pushed to eliminate due process rights for men (Only men, they're critical when women are denied due pr…
/r/MensRights24/08/19 12:51 PM
2

Restaurant sets the policies, follow them, or go someplace else without dress codes. Restaurants set the policies, but they're also legally responsible for the repercussions. The third option is if those policies are discriminatory, sue them and own the restaurant. Then change the policies.
/r/MensRights24/08/19 12:36 PM
1

entitled. Entitled to being treated equally, what a heinous concept. /s
/r/MensRights24/08/19 12:34 PM
2

Feminists have actually co-opted black oppression for white women and one of the huge differences is they're actually wrong. They argue historic discrimination against women hurts women today as historic discrimination against blacks girts blacks today. It does not follow. The reason blacks face historic discrimination is because BOTH their parents were black. My parents inter-racial marriage in 1960 was illegal in several states (My dad had "brass balls". Mom says I take after him). Even if you…
/r/MensRights24/08/19 10:42 AM
1

There are already male only scholarships. Sure, but just like in athletics, the scholarships have to be proportional based on enrollment. I want to say even 20 years ago, people argued that college athletic departments should consider ALL monies expended by the institution not just athletic scholarships to determine Title IX compliance rather than cutting men's athletic scholarships.
/r/MensRights24/08/19 10:29 AM
12

I’m pointing out that these shitty jokes are kinda plaguing the subreddit and it makes us look dumb Why would that make us look dumb when we point out that it's dumb? Have you considered that these feminists you spoke with might have cared about "manspreading" then found out it was a losing issue so now they don't? Most feminists tried to deny fathers custody and even visitation of their kids. Father's rights have now become mainstream. Most feminists now don't publicly oppose father's rights. S…
/r/MensRights24/08/19 10:13 AM
3

I remember hearing about a court system with non-unanimous juries. It might have been along the lines of civil cases. It would never be accepted by the cry bullies because there was balance, but it was intruding. It went like this. You had 12 jurors. If more than 9 jurors voted to convict, he was guilty. If fewer than 3 jurors voted to convict than his accuser was guilty. The idea was that if you could not get at least 3 jurors to side with you, the case must be so weak that you were guilty. Tha…
/r/MensRights24/08/19 03:32 AM
2

That's a good point. Even assuming her acquisition and use opf the sperm is legal, if she misrepresented the situation to the clinic, that's fraud.
/r/MensRights23/08/19 12:45 PM
3

According to that, the sticking point is the development of an after care plan. I don't know that this changes the expectation that she'll be released. Did a quick search and don't see an update, but if she was released a few extra years wouldn't be justice let alone a few extra weeks. EDIT: IMO a just sentence would have used this as a STARTING point, the time he served in prison + any deductions she would have received to that sentence (for good behavior, etc.) + the minimum within the sentenc…
/r/MensRights23/08/19 03:06 AM
5

Good point, but I think also if it benefits men / boys, it's bad. If it hurts men / boys then they just need to "man up".
/r/MensRights22/08/19 01:40 PM
9

"Ms Boll, who gave her address at the time as Woodstock Road, Forest Gate, was handed an 11 month prison sentence, suspended for two years, " So she served no jail time of course.
/r/MensRights22/08/19 01:33 PM
1

Did they over come discrimination or did they reverse it?
/r/MensRights22/08/19 03:37 AM
1

I think if it shouldn't matter who the father is, then unless a man is withdrawing his own sperm to use, sperm banks should be required to randomly select sperm. Yes, that's a satyric response to the feminist position that it shouldn't matter who the father is when it comes to men paying child support.
/r/MensRights22/08/19 03:35 AM
4

You've heard the saying "two wrongs don't make a right". I agreed, but as I mentioned, there is already precedent for this. Many colleges won't impose sanctions for underage drinking if a person reports another serious crime. Other places won't prosecute for immigration status if a person reports a crime. There's been talk about decriminalizing drug use / possession if for a person reporting an over dose. Why should this be treated differently? It would have been a HUGE miscarriage of justice fo…
/r/MensRights20/08/19 01:06 PM
9

Ask a woman if she fears getting raped. She'll probably say yes. Ask a woman if men should be afraid of being raped. She'll most certainly say no. The CDC shows men are raped in vast numbers. What can we deduce from this? Women believe their fear is more important than men's reality.
/r/MensRights18/08/19 05:22 PM
1

Either you're on idiot, or a troll. Neither, but then you'd need to have the ability to use logic and discuss in good faith. Define right. You seem to suggest that all rights are inherent even after you've discussed some that clearly aren't. The right to vote isn't given to 15 year olds. They earn it by turning 18. It's not just all 18 year olds. They earn it by right of citizenship. A non-citizen in this country can't vote.
/r/MensRights18/08/19 11:33 AM
1

Interesting take. When I first read this. "We don’t have to ask that question of the players, who are in a no-lose situation and have no reason to give up. " I shook my head. This was clear delusion. If men made $4 billion and got 9% of revenue, they made $360 million. If women's total revenue was $70 something million, that wouldn't be sustainable at all. Is it worth losing over $300 million (I'm sure there are other expenses beside salary) to have a womens soccer? The USWNT has more to lose. U…
/r/MensRights18/08/19 11:22 AM
8

Or you could work as hard, do the same quality of work, bring in the same amount of grant money, etc. As men. And no one would say anything. Exactly. Only men get elected. Women are 53% of the electorate. Women start ups don't get funded. Until the last batch of tech billionaires, women controlled most of the wealth in the U.S. It seems that when women inherit wealth from their dead husbands or fathers, all they do is spend it.
/r/MensRights18/08/19 02:24 AM
3

I checked their website to see if they receive federal funding and it seems they are correct unless there is a local or state law that requires charities / not for profits to serve every one. The only issue I'd take is that on their home page they say that they provide shelter to those in need. They also have a donation button on their home page. I could see where some could read that as all services are for every one and donate. Unless they start clicking other links, they may not realize that …
/r/MensRights18/08/19 02:13 AM
1

By your logic, because women can't be conscripted, they also don't have the right to a jury, and can be subject to being tried many times for the same crime. Were those rights only given to members of the militia? I've haven't looked, but don't believe there is language there of that kind. From what I recall, there were issues surrounding land ownership and poll taxes. Even all men weren't given the right to vote. That didn't happen until later. Let's assume for a moment that you're correct. The…
/r/MensRights18/08/19 01:46 AM
2

As an old school civil libertarian (The kind that believes you fight speech you don't like with speech not by banning it and laws should apply equally to all), I've been really concerned with the growing fascism on the left.
/r/MensRights17/08/19 05:18 PM
1

The Bill of Rights was all about getting states to sign off on the new constitution. At the time, it didn't restrict states at all (that came later, but it's a whole different topic). I guess, but women as a class still retained that right at the state level to the same extent as men. Women having their obligation removed is basically the same thing as being given a right men have earned.
/r/MensRights17/08/19 05:01 PM
2

It's a good article. I wonder about this. "which the singer has yet to publicly acknowledge, are proven true, then Perry should be exiled from the industry and considered a pariah. " Have feminists really waited until an allegation against a man was proven true before demanding he be banished? When have feminists championed due process rights in sexual offense cases? Well, well, women have been accused. We saw that with Asia Argento.
/r/MensRights17/08/19 03:38 PM
5

Katy hasn't responded. She's a woman so she knows it won't affect her.
/r/MensRights17/08/19 03:29 PM
2

She's nuts. She'd probably enjoy it.
/r/MensRights17/08/19 03:26 PM
1

Couldn't you find a contrary example of everything? I'm sure there are examples of a white person being lynched (killed without fair trial or even committing a crime. Mississippi Burning was a movie based on the real life killing of three civil rights activists two of which were white for example) so it wasn't about race. In other words if you take the position that a single contrary example or even a relatively small group makes it not a gender or race or class or anything else issue then there…
/r/MensRights16/08/19 10:20 PM
0

that they fulfilled a different role and had differing responsibilities then the civil rights act in egards to equal treatment for equal employment will not count Sure, but if one qualification is that they haven't been accused of sexual harassment, then you're wrong.
/r/MensRights16/08/19 07:57 PM
2

I didn't notice Alison Tieman, AKA typhon blue, on the list
/r/MensRights16/08/19 06:14 PM
0

Not according to the Civil Rights Act if 1963. Companies (and the SCOTUS extended this to contractor / customers when they ruled sports teams have to allow female reporters in the locker rooms if they allowed male reporters) are required to treat employees the same regardless of gender.
/r/MensRights16/08/19 05:32 PM
2

Innocent until proven guilty in a court of law, but also equality under the law. Now, companies don't have to follow the first one. They legally required to abide by the last one. We should expect any entity that acted against a male based on an accusation to do the same with Perry (ie if the record label dropped Dr. Luke, they should drop Perry also).
/r/MensRights16/08/19 05:11 PM
7

I would be interested in seeing the miscarriage rate for this town and if they are male fetuses being lost. Assuming it's not by design. I'm not suggesting anything different. I'm just pointing out that there are basic assumptions we make in society. Women are by nature good. If something works against men, we assume that it's a natural occurrence and not a purposeful end. Recently I was just thinking about two things. The Kavanaugh accusers and an incident recounted on feministing about a girl …
/r/MensRights16/08/19 04:33 PM
5

Why is it that when something like this happens to a woman, they seem to find and punish the perpetrator (example: Erin Andrews), but at least 20 men have been victimized and the best they can do is warn men of the scam? EDIT: One thing that's glaring is lack of details. If a woman is raped, what's the first thing police do? Circulate a description, right. Nothing has been released except that it's a woman. Are we to believe that all these guys did this with her camera muted or were told she did…
/r/MensRights16/08/19 04:06 PM
1

And what's the problem? The standard of evidence in a civil case is the preponderance of the evidence standard. This is the exact standard they advocate for the college kangaroo courts. Is that an admission that though "courts" are flawed and often get it wrong?
/r/MensRights16/08/19 12:55 AM
3

Well, if men are shamed for being weak, how many men would admit being physically abused by a woman?
/r/MensRights16/08/19 12:52 AM
1

Unless you really hated martinis, you should have drunk it and maybe make a show or game of it. Take bets to see how many people think you'll be unconscious in the next half hour. That way she'd feel weird when you're vindicated.
/r/MensRights15/08/19 11:45 PM
3

It's been my experience that men are better at multi-tasking. Maybe because I work in IT and we do a lot of automation, which allows us to accomplish several tasks at once. Beyond that though, most of the world's work saving innovation has come from men.
/r/MensRights15/08/19 11:35 PM
1

The clothing thing is frequently a straw man. It is and it isn't. It's certainly not what the feminists choose to portray it as. For a crime to be a crime, there has to be criminal intent. Because we don't know what's in a person's mind, we have to try and piece that together with what we can objectively see. The she was wearing X is for the defendant to show that she indicated through dress that she was willing to be approached. The thing is this is usually not where the question arises. The qu…
/r/MensRights15/08/19 04:52 PM
2

I mentioned that in a different comment. There were a few comments that steered the discussion towards the words he used or his motivations. Those were all things on the thread to detract from his story. I called it rape apology with "plausible deniability" in the event they got called out, which of course I did.
/r/MensRights15/08/19 04:31 PM
1

any group that does not acknowledge that female abusers and criminals exist and should be punished equally under the law are lying when they claim to care about men. That's one of the points I made to the feminists once. When it comes to female victims, nothing short of prevention is acceptable so why is the same not extended to male victims? I never got an answer.
/r/MensRights15/08/19 03:45 PM
9

I used to believe like you that it was fear. After talking with many feminists, I'm leaning toward it (addressing female perpetrators) being incompatible with their ideology. I've noticed on many spaces where the feminists aren't completely hostile toward men (menslib, good men project were there tend to be a "nix" of articles / opinions some supporting men) there is some concern for male victims. There is no discussion of female perpetrators. I don't even recall comments suggesting that women s…
/r/MensRights15/08/19 03:06 AM
4

There is a link to a screen grab of the comment in the title or picture. You can also click this one https://imgur.com/oFCuinB
/r/MensRights15/08/19 01:36 AM
2

It wouldn't be those. From what I understood, the issue was they couldn't vote anyway unless they turned 22 during their conscription then yes. I'm talking about those men over 21 who were drafted, but come to think of it, there were also those who resisted the draft and thus lost their right to vote. Could being subject to the draft be the rough equivalent to a "poll tax" that women did not have to pay? Pole taxes were considered denying a person the right to vote at least when it came to racia…
/r/MensRights15/08/19 12:56 AM
2

Can you link the article? I'm looking at the author's name, Cocksedge, and wondering if it's a hoax.
/r/MensRights14/08/19 09:15 PM
2

I wrote Bernie off the moment he said he wanted to forgive student debt. We need to continue to fund the re-education comas. What I support is government not making loans to students, but to schools. I propose keeping the same protections for government money that there are now (ie the loan the government gave the school can't be discharged in bankruptcy. They should also make the officers personally liable. support giving students the same protections as any consumer who takes out a loan (ie ac…
/r/MensRights14/08/19 03:51 PM
4

Good work. I have one other question to ask. How many men serving in Vietnam actually had the opportunity to vote? I postulate that many men actually had their voting rights stolen. EDIT Clarification: There were no polling places in the Vietnamese "forests". How many of these conscripted men had a legitimate opportunity to vote? There were also POWs who were conscripted and couldn't vote and of course the men who were killed or severely maimed to the point they could not vote. I don't believe a…
/r/MensRights14/08/19 03:27 PM
5

The CEO seems to believe that the ad had something to do with the loses. I don't have access to the full Market Watch article, but the timing is suspicious (a day before the numbers are released to the public) and if the Washington Examiner article accurately assessed the interview then what the CEO said was a departure from the current corporate line, it wasn't the ad it was that millenials (who they were targeting with the ads) don't shave (from what I know a canard. They shave more body parts…
/r/MensRights14/08/19 12:55 AM
2

If you can't find a woman who enjoys sex with you then I can see why a sex bot might be an attractive option though. That's another issue entirely. There are some heterosexual men who also seem to not want to have sex with women. Some guys don't want to have sex with women who want to have sex with them and PREFER pornography. I've heard women complain about that. Personally, I don't see an issue with that. If you're partner prefers porn to you, fix it, accept it, or leave the relationship. I kn…
/r/MensRights13/08/19 09:22 PM
7

Women being heterosexual and wanting sex are 2 separate things. I've heard articles on how women have with held sex to get chores (ie used sex as a bargaining tool). Sounds like sex is an obligation rather than a pleasure for some women. Women also don't necessarily pick their partners because they find them physically attractive. Many seem to pick their partners because they're rich or they have status / power. Again not so much enjoying sex, but using that to get something else they want. Of c…
/r/MensRights13/08/19 03:28 PM
11

They need equality in the armed forces. They should have an all female army.
/r/MensRights11/08/19 09:35 PM
1

So what's the answer because a person can absolutely be sexually harassed by someone who doesn't want to sleep with them. Some may sexually harass because they want to start a romantic relationship, but the feelings are not reciprocated. Others nay harass just to feel powerful. They don't have a desire to sleep with their victim. They want to belittle someone.
/r/MensRights09/08/19 06:13 AM
1

"because millennials are less likely to shave their beards as much as previous generations. " Then why did you cater your ad "toxic masculinity"to them? I know a bunch of millennial guys. They all gave razors. None of them have beards and they shave a whole lot more of their bodies then men of my generation. Their statement is BS all around.
/r/MensRights09/08/19 06:09 AM
2

People f*ck too that doesn't make it rape. What makes it wrong is if it's non-consensual. It hasn't been proven that he's grabbed anyone non-consensually. Oddly enough, there was another interview with Arrianna Zucker, the woman referenced in the infamous Access Hollywood tape, where she's on tape saying she found gin charming and was flirting with him. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X1Hs4vgmyWQ
/r/MensRights04/08/19 02:39 AM
1

Innocent men plead guilty too because they're threatened with decades (40 years for Brian Banks) in jail. The plea doesn't bother me although even the worst public defender could have told her that even if convicted she faced no real possibility of a significant punishment hence the plea to a $500 fine. That's basically parking in a handicap spot. She also was able to get that back (I don't believe she even paid it. I think it got cancelled prior to her paying.) Men who are wrongfully accused sp…
/r/MensRights22/07/19 01:57 AM
6

If I remember the story correctly, she got sentenced to a fine of $500, which I believe she ended up getting back. That's a far cry from men who have been forced to undergo intimate examinations (sexually assaulted) and incarcerated (whether having been wrongfully convicted or simply awaiting trial).
/r/MensRights21/07/19 09:52 PM
3

Feminists have tried to have their cake and eat it too. They claim raising children is unpaid labor and caring for aged parents is also unpaid labor although I don't know why that isn't payment in kind. I also suspect women are the biggest beneficiaries of this payment in kind as they live longer than men, have children at younger ages (women marry older men more often than men marry older women), and have less money for paid carers. My mom has worried about being a burden on me My sister is use…
/r/MensRights18/07/19 06:14 PM
3

My work had offered a free gym membership with personal trainer. A co-worker signed up for it. I didn't. He asked me why not because it was free. I told him that I would still need to work out. He ticked off a lot of people when he quit after the first day because he was sore. I'm sure they would have preferred saving money on the membership. Just because it's free doesn't mean you should take it. I also had some discussions with feminists over the new definition of rape. They insisted it helps …
/r/MensRights17/07/19 02:21 AM
3

That's for the perspective. I know that we view crime in terms of both the act, intent, and consequences so a guy pushing someone is committing battery, but if they fall out a window and die, it's manslaughter, and if he did that with the intent to kill, it's murder. I had a much longer response based on this, but my virgo / libra brain started parsing it and she might be attempting to close the empathy gap. I suspect that's the point you were trying to make and it's valid. I'll consider it in t…
/r/MensRights17/07/19 02:06 AM
2

Only if you take the literary dictionary definition. The problem with the dictionary definition of feminism is that they don't use the same definition of equality there than they do anywhere else.
/r/MensRights16/07/19 10:12 PM
1

""Young men who feel uncomfortable with the world — a sense of loss with their status, those who are not happy with their lives — they are coming to blame feminism," Carter said." How is that possible since feminism was supposed to benefit men too?
/r/MensRights16/07/19 10:07 PM
-22

" You might be misinterpreting it, " No, I'm pretty sure I understand. She's decided that the ends justify the means and instead of challenging a stereotype she'd just claim that it doesn't hold. There's always been a debate over whether truth and justice should settle for expediency. If I can't get an HPV vaccine to protect men, but can get it by selling it as a means of protecting women, why shouldn't I do that instead of challenging the empathy gap Sometimes I see the benefit. I question whet…
/r/MensRights16/07/19 09:56 PM
2

(Spoiler alter for the strain0 At the end of the series, they make clear that one of the reasons the master is succeeding is that many people instead of resisting have decided to just try to get by as best they can. This is essentially MGTOW. Instead of fighting ("extremist") feminism, I'll try and get by as best I can.
/r/MensRights16/07/19 08:04 PM
1

Why is there a debate is the question I have. I didn't think it cost that much to install.
/r/MensRights16/07/19 07:59 PM
1

Yes, she does. She states toxic masculinity is masculinity that does not benefit women.
/r/MensRights16/07/19 07:32 PM
-54

Why do they include the last part? It seems to justify violence as long as the recipient can take it. Som it would be fine to hit a strange man because he has the muscles to take it and since he doesn't know you, it's nit an emotional blow?
/r/MensRights16/07/19 07:29 PM
4

Women's bodies tend to be smaller. Their shirts are smaller. Their pants are smaller. I guess they could sow the same size pocket on a smaller pant, but they don't for aesthetic reasons also there might be an issue with there being enough fabric to support it. Coming soon: gravity is sexist because women can't carry as much as men.
/r/MensRights16/07/19 07:25 PM
1

Supposedly it enhances fan experience. One thing I read was a female reporter had seen the picture of a guy's wife and kids hanging in his locker. She asked him about it and that supposedly started the public interest on athletes personal lives. I wondered why she needed to see him undress and dress to ask gim about his family. I also suspect that may have started decades before with Joe DiMaggio and Marilyn Monroe. Most of the excuses they give make no sense. One justification is deadlines, but…
/r/MensRights13/07/19 05:24 PM
1

50% of DV is reciprocal. 50% of that is instigated by the woman. You cab absolutely choose not to hit someone. Yes, we can reduce DV against women by 50% if women learned to keep their hands to themselves.
/r/MensRights13/07/19 04:56 AM
1

When I first saw this it looked like wank. If it were 6 inches, you'd have to stroke it 10,560 times to wank a mile.
/r/MensRights12/07/19 08:23 PM
1

Michelle Daugherty Siri, a lawyer with the Towson-based Women’s Law Center, and other advocates are concerned defamation suits could have a “chilling effect” on women who have been assaulted pursuing justice. Even assuming good faith, why would this be the case? She actually gets more protections from a civil court than the accused gets in a colleges kangaroo court. They're using the preponderance of evidence standard that these activists demanded be used. It's actually harder to prove in a civi…
/r/MensRights12/07/19 05:59 PM
9

So are they going to criticize hospitals for offering chaperones for women so they aren't alone with male doctors ? Are they going to assert that the sex of a provider shouldn't matter and a woman can't request same gender care she gets what ever OBGYN, doctor, or nurse is assigned?
/r/MensRights12/07/19 05:50 PM
1

Then who bother placing a court order banning her from making hoax emergency calls and why wouldn't the involuntarily commit her for her own safety and the safety of others?
/r/MensRights12/07/19 05:37 PM
3

I'm a bit confused. Did she create another reddit account to dm herself? If she did, isn't that supposed to constitute a ban on reddit in it's entirety not just on this sub reddit?
/r/MensRights12/07/19 05:31 PM
1

Here's the article. http://archive.is/kQTHV I'm wondering (not really we know it's because she's a woman) why she didn't get a custodial sentence. Not only did she commit sexual assault, but she violated a court order not to place hoax calls to 999. I don't by the she has memory issues. Not remembering is not the same thing as not knowing that it's wrong.
/r/MensRights11/07/19 05:25 PM
1

People like what they like. I understand you can't do anything about height, but sometimes you're not dealt a good hand. A guy born blind or deaf or has some kind of disease where he can't walk has issues also and they're beyond dating. Sometimes life sucks and things aren't fair that doesn't mean you can be an a**hole. I also wonder if he can't get a date or has his own preferences. I'm a volcel. I'm celebrate by choice because I'm not interested in any of the women who are interested in me. Th…
/r/MensRights11/07/19 04:46 PM
1

The term I sometimes see is gendercide of males.
/r/MensRights11/07/19 04:28 PM
1

" Ms Campbell asked him to stop and eat dinner, and when he refused, she went into the office area of their home and told him she wanted him to eat with the family. She asked him several times and each time he said he would be out soon." I think that qualifies as coercive control as well.
/r/MensRights11/07/19 04:23 PM
3

Wasn't there a point in time where women were wearing men's shirts because it was over sized?
/r/MensRights10/07/19 12:42 AM
4

Just a guess, but I'm guessing it wasn't just 4 miners. It was 4 men. Didn't some one say if you have no uterus, you shouldn't have an opinion on abortion? Well, if your a** isn't on the line in the mines, why should you have a say on safety anyway?
/r/MensRights08/07/19 02:21 PM
1

When you talk about money, I suspect it's more about how much you make than what race you are. They still don't know the difference.
/r/MensRights08/07/19 12:30 PM
0

That just sound wrong. Maybe because I have a libertarian streak, no one is oppressed into making the first move. If you don't want to, don't. I get just as irritated with women who complain they can't get dates or can't find a man, but they never ask men out and they don't look.
/r/MensRights08/07/19 12:41 AM
2

Don't you think that mocking your opponent lacks class though? In American football, it's called excessive celebration or unsportsmanlike conduct. You can get a technical foul in basketball for taunting.
/r/MensRights08/07/19 12:34 AM
4

If the womens team faced the mens then they'd probably win based on pure talent. I doubt that very much. They can't even beat a high school boys soccer team consistently. If anything, one reason they win is they don't have to play against men.
/r/MensRights08/07/19 12:29 AM
1

So do these actual, modern, feminists want actual equality or just the parts that negatively affect women changed. I've yet to see one demand that infant circumcision of boys be banned for example. Is there really a difference then or do they just have actual problems to deal with?
/r/MensRights06/07/19 04:52 AM
1

Feminists never even called out Asia Argento for raping a minor.
/r/MensRights06/07/19 04:42 AM
7

Sure and there are literally 100 places on the Internet you can go to for that. There may even be a few you won't get banned from. I can see where the irritation is coming from where people can't even have one space dedicated to men's issues. I've never had an issue with people posting things that put women in a positive light. I've done that myself. I think that should be limited to when women help men / address injustices against men.
/r/MensRights06/07/19 02:03 AM
8

When men and women are kept separate because of religion there is usually a "flip" side. One issue I have is that in the West only women get to use religion to "ban" men. My issue is the fight for equality only looks at one side. For example, in Israel Hasidic men are not supposed to touch strange women. These men have requested seat changes on air craft. Israel was working on making that illegal. On the other hand, Israel allows the banning of men on it's beaches (I believe on certain days, but…
/r/MensRights05/07/19 10:16 PM
9

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/10/world/middleeast/lebanon-women-beach.html
/r/MensRights05/07/19 09:40 PM
1

Just because you bought a ticket for the men’s’ game doesn’t mean you have one for the women’s game Depends in the town I guess. Some places are sports town. Others probably don't care. In Chicago that boosted attendance at the girls games because the boys games were always at capacity. You either went to the girls game say at 12:00 or you risked not getting entrance for the boys game say at 3:00. This situation is somewhat different because the games are played in different stadiums and much of…
/r/MensRights05/07/19 04:57 PM
1

"Mr Justice Cohen said the woman was 'full of remorse'. " She's sorry she got caught. How can she be full of remorse if she kept the lie for 8 years?
/r/MensRights05/07/19 12:21 AM
2

Telling women they can't rape or kill or abuse some one dis-empowers women and is fundamentally incomparable with feminism. The less toxic feminists believe that women should refrain from that, but by choice because it's kind not to or even the wring thing to do , but the choice should not be the choice away. That position is big with mens libbers and femras (Mark Green once referred to himself as a men's rights feminist. I've seen that argument before with slaves. In high school the teacher tri…
/r/MensRights29/06/19 09:35 PM
3

Although I dread the ultimate outcome, I think the real solution is to take the class and file a Title IX complaint alleging that the content of the class crests a hostile environment for whites and men and so is a violation of Title IX. They would either have to change it or present a truth defense (I don't have faith that the current courts will care about the truth over what is PC and may accept "contemporary main stream media beliefs" as truth thus I dread the outcome). If they simply state …
/r/MensRights29/06/19 09:32 PM
3

I was just thinking about this since the issue with the women's soccer team not wanting to visit the white house if they win. I was thinking that maybe they should do something that warranted being invited like be able to beat a boy's high school soccer team more than occasionally. When I read your title. I was thinking basically the same thing you wrote. It's not just the military though, it's basically everything.
/r/MensRights27/06/19 11:45 PM
2

That was awesome. Thanks for posting. It made my day.
/r/MensRights24/06/19 09:47 PM
1

If you're only fertile 7 days a month, why are you taking birth control every day? Just a guess, but based on you're logic and math skills, you're probably too dumb to be allowed to breed.
/r/MensRights24/06/19 09:38 PM
1

Only because men are more likely to be attacked by other men. Women on the other hand are more likely than men to attack someone that they know. 30% or so of the people women kill are intimate partners. That doesn't even factor in their children. Last I checked, men were more likely to kill children, but women were twice as likely to kill their own. Something like 10% of the people men kill are intimate partners.
/r/MensRights24/06/19 09:19 PM
2

She might have meant attack by way of criticism. If I were EA, I'd just laugh that off. Those people weren't their customers anyway. Hiring her as a consultant would almost certainly alienate their customer base if they took her critique to heart.
/r/MensRights24/06/19 08:23 PM
3

I have porn which features only women. Damn, I didn't realize I was "woke".
/r/MensRights19/06/19 07:53 PM
1

Or find a more sneaky way to do it.
/r/MensRights19/06/19 03:02 AM
1

Isn't that what the feminists actually want though rather than justice? Because accused rapists are guilty, it doesn't matter what kind of trial they get or how evidence is gathered, etc. The article doesn't say what evidence was presented to get the confessions thrown. It states that they were "cocky" when they entered the precinct as evidence they weren't coerced, but that says little unless you know what their demeanor was when they left. Eddie Murphy had a skit where he says that American bl…
/r/MensRights19/06/19 02:45 AM
1

For all the shit we've seen in this sub that women do to kids and on the news I'm 100% in favour of abortion Kill them in the womb rather than after they're born just sounds weird. I guess it might make sense if you support euthanasia. Most people though would still wants the consent if not an outright request from the person euthanized.
/r/MensRights18/06/19 10:03 PM
2

Women's "empowerment" is being achieved at everyone's expense. The problem is that empowerment meant the ability to make decisions / take actions and deal with the outcome both good and bad. Women's empowerment has come to mean the ability to make decisions / take actions and avoid responsibility for bad outcomes while accepting the fruits of good ones.
/r/MensRights18/06/19 09:55 PM
3

Rape shield laws and publication bans. One justification for releasing the name of the accused is so that other victims might come forward. Ny that reasoning, it hinders the defense because other potential witness who could atest that the accuser has lied in previous instances are prevented from coming forward. In what other cases is exculpatory evidence suppressed? There was an incident where a woman had claimed to have been raped. The defense wanted to challenge the evidence (the vaginal teari…
/r/MensRights18/06/19 09:37 PM
1

There was an argument made to abolish the sex offender registry on similar grounds. The point was they served their time and shouldn't be "punished" anymore. That didn't go anywhere either. I remember reading about a guy I think it was the UK who couldn't lawfully have sex with anyone unless he notified the police before hand. Form what I remember, he wasn't even convicted of a crime.
/r/MensRights16/06/19 02:19 AM
9

This is actually about the reverse of that forcing abortions to avoid additional trauma to male victims or banning them to avoid additional trauma to male victims. The theory goes like this. Abortion is only banned because that particular state believes that the fetus is a person at the point they ban it. The exception for rape or incest doesn't argue that it's not a person. It says that even though it's a person and it's innocent of a crime, it should be killed to spore additional trauma to a r…
/r/MensRights15/06/19 04:57 AM
2

I got into a debate with a feminist once. I recounted how when I was young and buff and turned down a woman's advances, I was on a few occasions accused by them of being gay. The feminist suggested that I should have no issue with it because there is nothing wrong with being gay. I told her that there is nothing wrong with being straight either. Why should I accept being labeled something I'm not. I wasn't the only guy who had that happen to them either. I could see where a straight pride parade…
/r/MensRights15/06/19 03:55 AM
7

The sad thing is I bet the biggest impact on society wasn't that they left work, but that they blocked traffic so men couldn't get to work.
/r/MensRights15/06/19 03:16 AM
11

Did they though? I need to know they break down of those killed before I can say for sure. If 111 men were killed and 2 women, that's why there was no breakdown to hide the fact that the majority of people killed were men. If it were close to 60 men and 53 women nearly 50 /50, I would agree.
/r/MensRights13/06/19 03:27 AM
0

Of course, it's like people have lost their ability to read.
/r/MensRights27/05/19 07:12 PM
0

Of course, but you're missing the entire point of the comment. It's not that I think the sentence is harsh. To the contrary, it's extremely light. I'm suggesting book marking the article for when some cry bully asserts that no punishment should befall a woman when she commits a crime where there is "no victim". A picture is worth a thousand words as they say.
/r/MensRights27/05/19 07:11 PM
2

I watched maybe 2 episodes of iCarly and Hannah Montana. From what I can remember, Carly was competent. The male member(s) of her "crew" was not. I don't remember too much, but that was the general feeling I got. If anyone is more familiar with the show feel free to correct any misconceptions or provide more detail. Of course Hannah Montana was capable of fooling the entire world. I suspect though that Disney may be an entirely different issue.
/r/MensRights26/05/19 09:18 PM
3

The Simpsons have also been around for 30 years so is a contemporary of Married with Children. Meg from Family Guy (genius at least when compared to Chris) as opposed to Chris. Stewie is a (evil) genius, but he also was revealed as gay (now a lot less evil if at all).
/r/MensRights26/05/19 09:13 PM
-2

Here's a different angle. We're often told that false rape accusers shouldn't be prosecuted especially when a specific man hasn't been "victimized" (You can argue that a false rape complaint victimizes every man or at least every man who matches the "description", but that's an argument I don't want to look at now. For the sake of argument, let's assume there is no victim.). She got 5 years and probably should have gotten more. Was there even a "victim" in this case? Would Kellie Cooke even have…
/r/MensRights26/05/19 08:01 PM
4

It's worse than that. "Not only does this help people who are proven not to be the biological parent, but, also those people who find out later they are the parent and want to step up and be involved in their child's life. " It sounds like the current law is one of those unrebuttable paternity after two years. There was a similar situation in Michigan a few years back. A few years ago in Michigan the husband was assumed the father of a child born to his wife and it was an unrebuttable assumption…
/r/MensRights25/05/19 09:52 AM
2

Two things. I doubt that the reaction would be the same had it been a women's shelter. Also, where would you put them? You get the same issues with low income communities. Chicago used to have centralized public housing before section 8. There might have been 500 units in a building. A common slang term for them was "the cages" and that was the intent to keep those people out of the other neighborhoods. It was some of the worst crime ridden areas of the city. The gangs controlled the buildings. …
/r/MensRights23/05/19 03:54 PM
3

Requiring insurance companies to cover men's reproductive health / choices under the ACA would be a good place to start.
/r/MensRights22/05/19 01:31 AM
1

Not really because there are other laws that protect the mother. I remember a case where a guy got convicted for "poisoning" his pregnant GF with plan B. It wasn't murder or attempted murder, but was aggravated assault or something similar. Still a felony and still something that's going to severely impact your life.
/r/MensRights20/05/19 07:58 PM
6

So I started reading it and thought it's essentially a useless law since there are literally 100s of equal pay laws when you consider all jurisdictions a person falls under. Still, I thought OK, but what will they complain about when all companies have achieved certification? Then I read. "They would also be required to report the share of women who are among the company’s top earners, the total pay and total compensation gap that exists between men and women, regardless of job titles, experienc…
/r/MensRights20/05/19 03:59 PM
3

I think there are 2 different things. Child support reform, which should be done regardless of whether abortion is legal or not, and unilateral parental surrender (financial abortion). If you're looking for a half way for the latter, I'd suggest emphasizing the his body his choice / no one has the right to use your body to survive aspect of forcing a man to support his child through his labor. Why not use your formula for men who wanted the child and use the same formula, but only consider unear…
/r/MensRights19/05/19 07:43 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter