TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Ted8367 Archive

View 409 posts and 4,341 comments by Ted8367 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
205

Eastern CultureTed8367/r/MensRights06/02/15 02:21 AM
171

Ted8367/r/MensRights09/03/17 06:12 AM
157

Marriage/ChildrenTed8367/r/MensRights23/03/18 10:57 AM
133

Ted8367/r/MensRights08/03/17 10:48 AM
124

Ted8367/r/MensRights05/04/17 07:54 PM
109

GeneralTed8367/r/MensRights21/12/18 11:30 PM
107

Ted8367/r/MensRights04/11/12 11:54 PM
104

IntactivismTed8367/r/MensRights24/03/19 06:45 PM
103

Edu./Occu.Ted8367/r/MensRights17/09/18 11:55 PM
100

Legal RightsTed8367/r/MensRights16/05/19 11:29 AM
98

False AccusationTed8367/r/MensRights20/02/19 08:07 AM
97

Edu./Occu.Ted8367/r/MensRights22/02/19 09:47 PM
94

False AccusationTed8367/r/MensRights06/05/19 01:42 PM
92

Activism/SupportTed8367/r/MensRights12/06/17 05:45 AM
92

Anti-MRMTed8367/r/MensRights11/06/17 01:50 AM
87

FeminismTed8367/r/MensRights09/11/18 08:18 AM
86

Social IssuesTed8367/r/MensRights11/06/18 01:32 AM
75

Activism/SupportTed8367/r/MensRights26/04/15 02:38 AM
69

FeminismTed8367/r/MensRights02/06/17 02:04 AM
67

Ted8367/r/MensRights19/10/13 04:27 AM
66

Ted8367/r/MensRights29/12/13 02:44 AM
64

Anti-MRMTed8367/r/MensRights06/06/17 07:51 AM
64

Social IssuesTed8367/r/MensRights17/09/18 02:53 AM
61

Edu./Occu.Ted8367/r/MensRights25/01/18 08:41 AM
54

Ted8367/r/MensRights25/06/13 04:07 AM
54

GeneralTed8367/r/MensRights13/06/17 12:13 PM
53

False AccusationTed8367/r/MensRights08/04/18 11:38 AM
52

DiscriminationTed8367/r/MensRights29/08/17 01:26 PM
52

Global IssuesTed8367/r/MensRights05/02/19 01:10 PM
48

Marriage/DivorceTed8367/r/MensRights14/08/15 12:22 PM
48

IntactivismTed8367/r/MensRights26/10/15 04:15 AM
46

GeneralTed8367/r/MensRights09/06/17 07:34 AM
46

Edu./Occu.Ted8367/r/MensRights11/09/17 07:24 AM
46

Ted8367/r/MensRights15/02/14 10:18 AM
45

Social IssuesTed8367/r/MensRights11/03/18 10:22 AM
45

GeneralTed8367/r/MensRights11/12/17 07:39 PM
45

Social IssuesTed8367/r/MensRights13/03/19 10:34 PM
43

Ted8367/r/MensRights29/03/17 09:05 AM
43

Edu./Occu.Ted8367/r/MensRights10/05/17 05:23 AM
42

DiscriminationTed8367/r/MensRights26/03/18 01:26 AM
41

Ted8367/r/MensRights13/03/14 09:50 PM
41

Ted8367/r/MensRights06/07/13 03:15 AM
40

Ted8367/r/MensRights22/03/17 08:14 AM
40

Social IssuesTed8367/r/MensRights28/05/18 01:12 PM
40

Social IssuesTed8367/r/MensRights21/10/15 06:49 PM
39

False AccusationTed8367/r/MensRights23/03/17 10:11 AM
38

Social IssuesTed8367/r/MensRights10/03/18 04:15 AM
38

Anti-MRMTed8367/r/MensRights13/07/17 08:18 AM
37

Edu./Occu.Ted8367/r/MensRights18/12/18 06:17 PM
37

Anti-MRATed8367/r/MensRights01/03/15 10:10 AM
37

Legal RightsTed8367/r/MensRights13/07/18 06:22 AM
36

Ted8367/r/MensRights09/03/17 01:05 PM
36

GeneralTed8367/r/MensRights28/07/18 11:57 AM
35

FeminismTed8367/r/MensRights23/12/15 11:53 AM
35

Social IssuesTed8367/r/MensRights08/08/17 12:18 AM
35

Anti-MRMTed8367/r/MensRights07/06/17 12:13 AM
33

Social IssuesTed8367/r/MensRights18/08/18 05:58 AM
32

Activism/SupportTed8367/r/MensRights08/07/17 04:28 AM
32

Social IssuesTed8367/r/MensRights29/01/17 07:36 AM
32

IntactivismTed8367/r/MensRights06/02/18 02:47 AM
32

Social IssuesTed8367/r/MensRights25/09/17 10:31 AM
31

Ted8367/r/MensRights20/03/17 03:55 AM
31

Edu./Occu.Ted8367/r/MensRights30/12/18 07:58 AM
31

Ted8367/r/MensRights15/03/17 08:30 PM
30

Edu./Occu.Ted8367/r/MensRights14/05/19 12:52 PM
30

Marriage/ChildrenTed8367/r/MensRights25/08/18 04:23 AM
29

Activism/SupportTed8367/r/MensRights17/07/17 11:28 PM
29

Social IssuesTed8367/r/MensRights30/01/17 10:37 AM
29

Ted8367/r/MensRights23/02/13 02:25 AM
29

Activism/SupportTed8367/r/MensRights05/02/18 08:21 AM
29

Ted8367/r/MensRights13/03/17 10:47 AM
29

WBBTed8367/r/MensRights13/02/15 06:41 AM
28

Legal RightsTed8367/r/MensRights19/12/17 06:24 PM
28

Ted8367/r/MensRights15/11/13 10:08 PM
28

Ted8367/r/MensRights14/03/17 12:33 PM
28

Legal RightsTed8367/r/MensRights08/12/17 05:34 AM
28

Social IssuesTed8367/r/MensRights31/10/17 07:23 AM
28

Ted8367/r/MensRights25/03/17 03:11 AM
27

Social IssuesTed8367/r/MensRights04/01/16 05:58 AM
27

False AccusationTed8367/r/MensRights07/07/17 04:14 AM
27

Anti-MRMTed8367/r/MensRights20/12/17 11:38 PM
27

Ted8367/r/MensRights20/06/18 05:03 AM
26

Social IssuesTed8367/r/MensRights18/04/18 03:00 AM
26

Legal RightsTed8367/r/MensRights14/12/18 11:55 PM
26

Marriage/ChildrenTed8367/r/MensRights18/02/18 12:09 AM
26

Activism/SupportTed8367/r/MensRights10/07/17 07:01 AM
26

False AccusationTed8367/r/MensRights19/02/18 10:54 AM
25

False AccusationTed8367/r/MensRights30/04/17 01:13 AM
25

Ted8367/r/MensRights14/11/13 11:55 PM
25

Activism/SupportTed8367/r/MensRights07/08/17 04:42 AM
25

Legal RightsTed8367/r/MensRights04/04/17 11:12 PM
25

False AccusationTed8367/r/MensRights05/09/15 11:08 AM
25

Activism/SupportTed8367/r/MensRights25/07/17 11:37 AM
25

Marriage/DivorceTed8367/r/MensRights05/07/15 11:02 PM
24

Legal RightsTed8367/r/MensRights14/12/15 03:16 AM
24

Ted8367/r/MensRights18/02/14 10:06 PM
24

GeneralTed8367/r/MensRights13/04/18 11:57 AM
24

Legal RightsTed8367/r/MensRights13/07/18 01:27 AM
23

Social IssuesTed8367/r/MensRights30/01/18 09:17 AM
23

Social IssuesTed8367/r/MensRights16/08/17 09:03 AM
23

Edu./Occu.Ted8367/r/MensRights29/04/18 05:55 AM
23

Ted8367/r/MensRights31/01/14 10:37 AM
22

GeneralTed8367/r/MensRights10/09/17 04:05 AM
22

False AccusationTed8367/r/MensRights28/02/17 01:55 AM
22

Social IssuesTed8367/r/MensRights29/01/18 11:59 PM
22

Ted8367/r/MensRights23/08/12 02:55 AM
22

Activism/SupportTed8367/r/MensRights04/04/17 03:36 AM
21

False AccusationTed8367/r/MensRights11/04/17 06:53 AM
21

Fathers/CustodyTed8367/r/MensRights31/03/17 03:11 AM
21

GeneralTed8367/r/MensRights30/07/17 10:19 AM
21

Activism/SupportTed8367/r/MensRights30/11/15 05:49 PM
21

GeneralTed8367/r/MensRights20/02/18 01:20 AM
21

Legal RightsTed8367/r/MensRights23/05/17 12:42 PM
20

Edu./Occu.Ted8367/r/MensRights22/04/18 12:30 PM
20

Social IssuesTed8367/r/MensRights29/05/18 12:03 AM
20

Social IssuesTed8367/r/MensRights17/04/17 10:18 AM
20

Ted8367/r/MensRights11/06/13 12:15 AM
20

Social IssuesTed8367/r/MensRights12/06/18 10:55 AM
20

Ted8367/r/MensRights30/06/18 10:01 AM
20

Ted8367/r/MensRights23/03/17 10:27 AM
20

Activism/SupportTed8367/r/MensRights06/02/18 04:25 AM
20

Activism/SupportTed8367/r/MensRights04/08/18 08:00 PM
20

GeneralTed8367/r/MensRights03/04/18 02:15 AM
19

Ted8367/r/MensRights20/03/17 06:01 AM
19

NewsTed8367/r/MensRights20/04/15 11:01 AM
19

GeneralTed8367/r/MensRights27/03/18 03:39 AM
19

False AccusationTed8367/r/MensRights18/03/19 12:05 PM
19

Activism/SupportTed8367/r/MensRights03/04/17 11:38 AM
19

GeneralTed8367/r/MensRights09/01/18 10:34 AM
19

Ted8367/r/MensRights12/03/17 05:15 AM
19

False AccusationTed8367/r/MensRights03/01/18 06:32 AM
18

Activism/SupportTed8367/r/MensRights23/12/16 08:10 PM
18

Ted8367/r/MensRights17/03/17 06:30 AM
18

Ted8367/r/MensRights25/07/13 09:09 AM
18

Ted8367/r/MensRights21/03/17 08:54 AM
18

Legal RightsTed8367/r/MensRights14/08/17 06:19 AM
18

False AccusationTed8367/r/MensRights11/11/17 08:49 PM
18

Ted8367/r/MensRights01/11/13 01:41 AM
18

Ted8367/r/MensRights18/03/17 07:04 AM
17

Legal RightsTed8367/r/MensRights09/07/17 07:20 AM
17

GeneralTed8367/r/MensRights11/05/18 06:02 PM
17

Legal RightsTed8367/r/MensRights02/03/19 09:58 AM
17

Social IssuesTed8367/r/MensRights03/10/17 06:53 AM
17

Activism/SupportTed8367/r/MensRights20/06/17 01:42 AM
17

Activism/SupportTed8367/r/MensRights29/03/18 09:37 AM
16

DiscriminationTed8367/r/MensRights18/04/17 02:38 AM
16

Social IssuesTed8367/r/MensRights11/05/18 05:06 PM
16

False AccusationTed8367/r/MensRights12/03/18 05:37 AM
16

Legal RightsTed8367/r/MensRights03/06/19 12:42 PM
16

Social IssuesTed8367/r/MensRights23/06/17 08:37 PM
16

Ted8367/r/MensRights02/03/14 10:48 AM
15

Ted8367/r/MensRights02/07/13 09:47 PM
15

Ted8367/r/MensRights15/01/14 09:05 PM
15

FeminismTed8367/r/MensRights30/05/17 03:58 AM
15

Social IssuesTed8367/r/MensRights25/05/17 08:25 PM
15

Social IssuesTed8367/r/MensRights16/08/17 09:01 AM
15

Activism/SupportTed8367/r/MensRights21/09/17 12:52 PM
15

Ted8367/r/MensRights28/09/13 10:00 AM
15

Edu./Occu.Ted8367/r/MensRights06/03/19 08:44 AM
14

GeneralTed8367/r/MensRights30/07/18 10:49 AM
14

Ted8367/r/MensRights06/04/17 04:30 AM
14

Social IssuesTed8367/r/MensRights21/08/18 12:58 PM
14

Legal RightsTed8367/r/MensRights08/02/19 09:41 AM
14

False AccusationTed8367/r/MensRights08/10/17 08:07 PM
14

Social IssuesTed8367/r/MensRights07/02/18 05:15 PM
14

Ted8367/r/MensRights28/03/17 01:03 AM
14

HumourTed8367/r/MensRights03/09/17 01:43 PM
14

Ted8367/r/MensRights26/06/13 10:32 PM
14

Activism/SupportTed8367/r/MensRights13/07/17 03:06 PM
13

Ted8367/r/MensRights02/02/13 04:58 AM
13

Edu./Occu.Ted8367/r/MensRights18/12/18 09:18 AM
13

Social IssuesTed8367/r/MensRights13/02/18 06:01 AM
13

False AccusationTed8367/r/MensRights24/10/17 08:14 AM
13

Social IssuesTed8367/r/MensRights22/12/17 12:35 AM
13

Marriage/ChildrenTed8367/r/MensRights06/04/19 03:09 AM
13

False AccusationTed8367/r/MensRights15/07/18 01:52 AM
13

Ted8367/r/MensRights25/03/17 02:40 AM
13

HumourTed8367/r/MensRights01/01/19 01:57 AM
12

Legal RightsTed8367/r/MensRights21/05/18 12:14 PM
12

Social IssuesTed8367/r/MensRights18/02/18 05:50 AM
12

Anti-MRMTed8367/r/MensRights16/12/16 03:25 AM
12

Social IssuesTed8367/r/MensRights26/01/18 04:50 AM
12

Ted8367/r/MensRights08/04/17 10:42 AM
12

GeneralTed8367/r/MensRights31/07/17 07:52 AM
12

Social IssuesTed8367/r/MensRights09/07/18 09:16 AM
12

FeminismTed8367/r/MensRights31/07/17 04:25 AM
12

Social IssuesTed8367/r/MensRights25/08/17 12:33 PM
12

Legal RightsTed8367/r/MensRights23/07/18 06:34 AM
12

WBBTed8367/r/MensRights28/12/14 06:46 AM
12

False AccusationTed8367/r/MensRights07/10/15 02:42 AM
12

Legal RightsTed8367/r/MensRights03/04/18 12:20 PM
12

Activism/SupportTed8367/r/MensRights16/06/17 07:48 AM
11

Social IssuesTed8367/r/MensRights01/07/17 07:23 AM
11

Ted8367/r/MensRights29/03/17 01:29 AM
11

Activism/SupportTed8367/r/MensRights31/03/17 02:52 AM
11

NewsTed8367/r/MensRights04/01/15 06:29 AM
11

Ted8367/r/MensRights21/10/14 12:53 AM
11

False AccusationTed8367/r/MensRights28/08/17 11:18 AM
11

Social IssuesTed8367/r/MensRights05/03/18 05:06 AM
10

Activism/SupportTed8367/r/MensRights24/09/18 05:03 AM
10

Activism/SupportTed8367/r/MensRights29/05/17 05:18 AM
10

Activism/SupportTed8367/r/MensRights17/04/17 06:15 AM
10

Ted8367/r/MensRights14/03/17 01:29 PM
10

Ted8367/r/MensRights06/04/13 03:10 AM
10

FeminismTed8367/r/MensRights07/06/18 01:40 PM
10

DiscussionTed8367/r/MensRights12/03/15 05:04 AM
10

False AccusationTed8367/r/MensRights14/03/17 02:04 AM
10

GeneralTed8367/r/MensRights22/04/17 12:54 AM
10

AnalysisTed8367/r/MensRights09/03/15 12:53 AM
10

Social IssuesTed8367/r/MensRights23/01/18 05:31 AM
9

Activism/SupportTed8367/r/MensRights17/06/15 09:23 AM
9

Social IssuesTed8367/r/MensRights15/05/17 12:58 AM
9

NewsTed8367/r/MensRights25/01/15 06:35 AM
9

Ted8367/r/MensRights22/03/17 04:08 AM
9

Ted8367/r/MensRights30/10/13 09:51 PM
9

Ted8367/r/MensRights12/03/17 05:28 AM
9

False AccusationTed8367/r/MensRights31/12/18 01:35 AM
9

Ted8367/r/MensRights12/04/17 12:16 PM
9

Activism/SupportTed8367/r/MensRights27/06/17 05:35 AM
9

Ted8367/r/MensRights05/11/13 01:01 AM
9

Activism/SupportTed8367/r/MensRights14/03/18 11:11 AM
9

Social IssuesTed8367/r/MensRights25/02/18 03:06 AM
9

False AccusationTed8367/r/MensRights15/02/18 12:45 AM
9

GeneralTed8367/r/MensRights16/05/17 11:51 AM
9

False AccusationTed8367/r/MensRights16/07/17 04:40 AM
9

Legal RightsTed8367/r/MensRights08/04/19 12:39 PM
8

Activism/SupportTed8367/r/MensRights13/02/18 10:53 PM
8

Social IssuesTed8367/r/MensRights09/08/17 05:20 AM
8

Legal RightsTed8367/r/MensRights20/05/18 09:17 PM
8

Activism/SupportTed8367/r/MensRights01/07/17 01:57 PM
8

Edu./Occu.Ted8367/r/MensRights25/07/18 02:26 AM
8

False AccusationTed8367/r/MensRights31/07/17 11:56 AM
8

Marriage/ChildrenTed8367/r/MensRights07/01/18 07:01 AM
8

Activism/SupportTed8367/r/MensRights02/08/18 07:28 AM
8

Social IssuesTed8367/r/MensRights26/01/17 03:02 AM
8

Raising AwarenessTed8367/r/MensRights15/03/15 10:29 AM
8

Ted8367/r/MensRights07/02/13 10:38 PM
8

Social IssuesTed8367/r/MensRights10/11/15 10:50 AM
8

Legal RightsTed8367/r/MensRights08/11/17 08:25 PM
8

Reverse GendersTed8367/r/MensRights19/01/15 11:43 PM
8

NewsTed8367/r/MensRights24/11/14 05:06 AM
8

Activism/SupportTed8367/r/MensRights23/05/17 12:51 PM
8

Legal RightsTed8367/r/MensRights31/12/17 10:45 AM
8

DiscriminationTed8367/r/MensRights10/09/17 02:24 PM
8

Ted8367/r/MensRights18/01/13 02:31 AM
7

False AccusationTed8367/r/MensRights11/12/17 05:27 AM
7

Edu./Occu.Ted8367/r/MensRights26/07/18 03:55 AM
7

Social IssuesTed8367/r/MensRights19/08/17 11:37 AM
7

GeneralTed8367/r/MensRights07/08/18 06:49 AM
7

GeneralTed8367/r/MensRights10/11/17 02:54 AM
7

False AccusationTed8367/r/MensRights09/10/17 09:57 AM
7

Social IssuesTed8367/r/MensRights05/12/15 05:13 AM
7

Social IssuesTed8367/r/MensRights14/05/18 09:33 PM
7

False AccusationTed8367/r/MensRights24/01/19 06:42 PM
7

Social IssuesTed8367/r/MensRights17/05/17 10:51 AM
7

Social IssuesTed8367/r/MensRights17/10/17 11:45 AM
7

Legal RightsTed8367/r/MensRights20/04/18 04:28 AM
7

Legal RightsTed8367/r/MensRights24/10/18 05:23 PM
7

False AccusationTed8367/r/MensRights05/05/15 12:02 AM
7

Activism/SupportTed8367/r/MensRights24/01/18 04:43 AM
7

GeneralTed8367/r/MensRights14/06/17 12:10 AM
7

Marriage/DivorceTed8367/r/MensRights23/06/17 02:03 AM
7

Social IssuesTed8367/r/MensRights29/10/15 01:38 AM
7

False AccusationTed8367/r/MensRights25/09/17 04:27 AM
7

Legal RightsTed8367/r/MensRights06/07/17 03:36 AM
7

FeminismTed8367/r/MensRights07/02/18 02:11 AM
6

Ted8367/r/MensRights16/07/13 08:41 AM
6

Social IssuesTed8367/r/MensRights10/06/18 12:16 AM
6

Activism/SupportTed8367/r/MensRights01/09/17 10:26 AM
6

Ted8367/r/MensRights09/10/13 05:32 AM
6

Edu./Occu.Ted8367/r/MensRights20/01/18 08:24 AM
6

Ted8367/r/MensRights21/11/13 03:13 AM
6

Social IssuesTed8367/r/MensRights05/08/15 11:11 PM
6

Activism/SupportTed8367/r/MensRights21/06/17 08:56 AM
6

Activism/SupportTed8367/r/MensRights24/06/17 03:10 PM
6

DiscriminationTed8367/r/MensRights07/02/18 04:26 PM
6

Activism/SupportTed8367/r/MensRights20/11/17 07:54 PM
6

Legal RightsTed8367/r/MensRights05/06/19 09:42 AM
6

Activism/SupportTed8367/r/MensRights20/01/18 08:35 AM
6

Ted8367/r/MensRights21/07/13 07:07 AM
6

Activism/SupportTed8367/r/MensRights30/03/17 01:26 AM
6

Ted8367/r/MensRights10/02/14 10:21 PM
6

GeneralTed8367/r/MensRights23/04/18 08:10 PM
6

Legal RightsTed8367/r/MensRights07/12/17 11:14 PM
6

GeneralTed8367/r/MensRights20/12/17 04:53 AM
6

Legal RightsTed8367/r/MensRights17/08/17 12:57 PM
6

FeminismTed8367/r/MensRights23/04/18 07:57 AM
5

Anti-MRMTed8367/r/MensRights22/06/17 12:06 PM
5

HumourTed8367/r/MensRights28/02/18 09:37 AM
5

Legal RightsTed8367/r/MensRights13/07/18 01:21 AM
5

Activism/SupportTed8367/r/MensRights30/05/17 06:38 AM
5

Social IssuesTed8367/r/MensRights12/08/17 11:24 AM
5

Activism/SupportTed8367/r/MensRights19/06/17 01:35 AM
5

Ted8367/r/MensRights29/03/17 05:30 AM
5

Activism/SupportTed8367/r/MensRights06/08/17 07:27 AM
5

GeneralTed8367/r/MensRights08/09/18 05:02 AM
5

Legal RightsTed8367/r/MensRights17/07/17 09:04 AM
5

Ted8367/r/MensRights26/06/18 02:24 AM
5

Ted8367/r/MensRights13/07/13 08:48 PM
5

Activism/SupportTed8367/r/MensRights04/06/17 06:49 AM
5

Activism/SupportTed8367/r/MensRights02/08/17 04:37 AM
5

Ted8367/r/MensRights20/11/13 06:34 AM
5

False AccusationTed8367/r/MensRights24/02/19 08:36 AM
5

Legal RightsTed8367/r/MensRights03/07/17 06:14 AM
5

Activism/SupportTed8367/r/MensRights09/04/17 05:37 AM
5

Activism/SupportTed8367/r/MensRights28/07/17 11:11 AM
4

Ted8367/r/MensRights15/08/13 12:44 AM
4

Ted8367/r/MensRights31/10/12 06:52 AM
4

DiscussionTed8367/r/MensRights16/11/14 11:25 PM
4

Activism/SupportTed8367/r/MensRights28/06/17 07:44 AM
4

Ted8367/r/MensRights13/03/14 02:00 AM
4

False AccusationsTed8367/r/MensRights08/01/15 10:22 AM
4

Legal RightsTed8367/r/MensRights11/09/17 04:17 AM
4

Legal RightsTed8367/r/MensRights12/06/17 05:55 AM
4

False AccusationTed8367/r/MensRights13/01/19 05:21 AM
4

DiscriminationTed8367/r/MensRights22/12/17 03:14 AM
4

Ted8367/r/MensRights07/02/14 12:41 AM
4

Social IssuesTed8367/r/MensRights25/08/17 03:52 AM
4

Social IssuesTed8367/r/MensRights30/06/17 10:30 AM
4

Ted8367/r/MensRights18/02/14 02:41 AM
4

Social IssuesTed8367/r/MensRights30/09/15 05:31 AM
4

Activism/SupportTed8367/r/MensRights27/06/17 05:47 AM
4

Social IssuesTed8367/r/MensRights27/06/17 01:49 AM
4

NewsTed8367/r/MensRights03/01/15 12:58 AM
4

False AccusationTed8367/r/MensRights28/06/15 09:12 AM
4

HumourTed8367/r/MensRights09/04/18 06:55 AM
4

Ted8367/r/MensRights15/03/17 08:58 PM
4

Social IssuesTed8367/r/MensRights24/02/18 04:45 AM
4

False AccusationTed8367/r/MensRights30/05/17 11:03 PM
4

Marriage/ChildrenTed8367/r/MensRights25/09/17 12:01 PM
4

Activism/SupportTed8367/r/MensRights28/07/17 11:13 AM
3

ProgressTed8367/r/MensRights09/08/17 03:08 AM
3

Activism/SupportTed8367/r/MensRights19/06/17 02:31 AM
3

Fathers/CustodyTed8367/r/MensRights08/05/17 08:19 AM
3

Legal RightsTed8367/r/MensRights24/04/17 11:41 AM
3

Social IssuesTed8367/r/MensRights22/05/17 06:16 AM
3

Social IssuesTed8367/r/MensRights08/08/17 06:52 AM
3

GeneralTed8367/r/MensRights24/04/17 07:45 AM
3

Legal RightsTed8367/r/MensRights10/11/17 09:22 AM
3

False AccusationTed8367/r/MensRights08/08/17 07:21 AM
3

WBBTed8367/r/MensRights03/04/15 05:23 AM
3

NewsTed8367/r/MensRights09/12/14 10:47 AM
3

GeneralTed8367/r/MensRights18/01/18 07:32 AM
3

GeneralTed8367/r/MensRights20/03/18 12:27 AM
3

False AccusationTed8367/r/MensRights07/08/17 06:30 AM
3

GeneralTed8367/r/MensRights28/10/17 01:00 AM
3

Ted8367/r/MensRights05/04/17 02:31 AM
3

Ted8367/r/MensRights18/10/12 03:29 AM
3

Social IssuesTed8367/r/MensRights17/12/17 12:18 PM
3

Ted8367/r/MensRights04/04/17 11:55 PM
3

DiscussionTed8367/r/MensRights03/01/15 01:17 AM
3

Social IssuesTed8367/r/MensRights07/05/19 12:39 PM
3

GeneralTed8367/r/MensRights31/05/17 12:46 PM
3

ProgressTed8367/r/MensRights17/02/19 02:10 AM
3

Social IssuesTed8367/r/MensRights23/06/17 05:54 AM
3

Social IssuesTed8367/r/MensRights06/03/18 07:56 AM
3

False AccusationTed8367/r/MensRights03/05/18 08:31 AM
3

Legal RightsTed8367/r/MensRights13/06/17 09:03 AM
3

Social IssuesTed8367/r/MensRights28/07/17 11:21 AM
3

Activism/SupportTed8367/r/MensRights22/06/17 01:22 PM
3

FeminismTed8367/r/MensRights16/01/19 10:01 AM
2

Ted8367/r/MensRights14/01/13 11:22 PM
2

Social IssuesTed8367/r/MensRights10/06/18 06:43 AM
2

Edu./Occu.Ted8367/r/MensRights23/01/19 08:58 AM
2

FeminismTed8367/r/MensRights02/06/17 11:33 AM
2

Legal RightsTed8367/r/MensRights08/05/17 05:55 AM
2

Social IssuesTed8367/r/MensRights11/05/17 10:35 AM
2

Ted8367/r/MensRights14/06/13 06:25 AM
2

FeminismTed8367/r/MensRights03/04/15 04:33 AM
2

Global IssuesTed8367/r/MensRights11/02/19 05:00 AM
2

Social IssuesTed8367/r/MensRights21/04/18 02:47 AM
2

DiscriminationTed8367/r/MensRights17/12/18 03:38 AM
2

Ted8367/r/MensRights28/03/17 06:29 AM
2

FeminismTed8367/r/MensRights17/10/17 11:26 AM
2

Ted8367/r/MensRights30/06/13 06:36 AM
2

Activism/SupportTed8367/r/MensRights16/11/17 05:39 AM
2

Edu./Occu.Ted8367/r/MensRights06/08/17 09:23 AM
2

Activism/SupportTed8367/r/MensRights20/02/19 08:49 AM
2

Social IssuesTed8367/r/MensRights29/06/17 11:40 AM
2

False AccusationTed8367/r/MensRights23/04/18 01:23 PM
1

DiscriminationTed8367/r/MensRights09/08/17 10:00 PM
1

GeneralTed8367/r/MensRights22/05/17 08:06 AM
1

False AccusationsTed8367/r/MensRights03/02/15 05:21 AM
1

Reverse GendersTed8367/r/MensRights05/11/14 01:24 AM
1

DiscussionTed8367/r/MensRights25/01/15 04:12 AM
1

Ted8367/r/MensRights25/02/14 09:20 PM
1

Activism/SupportTed8367/r/MensRights21/06/17 06:13 AM
1

Social IssuesTed8367/r/MensRights13/01/19 04:16 AM
1

Legal RightsTed8367/r/MensRights05/06/17 04:08 AM
1

DiscussionTed8367/r/MensRights07/01/15 05:46 PM
1

FeminismTed8367/r/MensRights19/06/16 12:35 PM
1

Fathers/CustodyTed8367/r/MensRights10/05/17 11:27 AM
1

GeneralTed8367/r/MensRights10/05/17 03:36 AM
1

Activism/SupportTed8367/r/MensRights24/02/18 03:58 AM
1

Ted8367/r/MGTOW17/12/17 12:16 PM
1

Legal RightsTed8367/r/MensRights22/07/18 06:16 AM
1

DiscussionTed8367/r/MensRights05/06/14 12:19 AM
1

Ted8367/r/MensRights28/12/14 09:59 PM
0

Ted8367/r/MensRights07/11/13 02:40 AM
0

Ted8367/r/MensRights16/10/14 11:53 PM
0

Social IssuesTed8367/r/MensRights22/05/17 03:11 AM
0

Ted8367/r/MensRights18/06/18 09:31 AM
0

Ted8367/r/MensRights24/08/12 06:48 AM
0

Ted8367/r/MensRights22/08/13 11:45 PM
0

Social IssuesTed8367/r/MensRights07/01/16 10:16 AM
0

False AccusationTed8367/r/MensRights04/01/16 05:35 AM
0

Ted8367/r/MensRights16/01/16 05:36 PM
0

Ted8367/r/MensRights24/06/18 11:59 AM
0

Ted8367/r/MensRights25/05/13 06:21 AM
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 4,341 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

can't see the men's rights angle for this Ah, ha Going to remove it then? It's about the right of a man to become a woman, and the legal backing for that. Right there in the title - "Legal limits to identifying as a woman for profit."
/r/MensRights05/06/19 01:33 PM
1

More information about the case: https://www.thepostmillennial.com/no-clean-hands-in-infamous-transgender-genital-waxing-case/ ​ Tribunal decision (pdf): http://www.bchrt.bc.ca/shareddocs/decisions/2019/may/106_JY_v_Various_Waxing_Salons_2019_BCHRT_106.pdf
/r/MensRights05/06/19 09:45 AM
2

I don't understand this Yes, the remark doesn't make sense. There's no reason to think that Deepika Bhardwaj is a feminist ; just look at her quote in the OP. However, A. Centauri has achieved a considerable discussion on his favorite topic, feminism. And in a men's rights sub too.
/r/MensRights01/06/19 10:17 AM
1

Cannibal ate 6 Jehovah Whiteness, 23 pizza delivery men and 2 postmen in 7 years Ivan did show remorse for killing the deliverymen and postmen but not for killing the Jehova Witnesses. Apparently, he found them annoying and wished he had killed more of them.
/r/MensRights30/05/19 10:59 PM
2

I blame smartphones.
/r/MensRights30/05/19 09:43 PM
8

Are you seriously offended that Native American tribes exist What a peculiar question.
/r/MensRights28/05/19 01:28 AM
5

They asked one short question for gender, and one very detailed question for ethnicity. It's the ethnicity that consumed them. Native American Tribes are a thing Such a big thing, they ask about it on all the academic forms? I didn't know that.
/r/MensRights28/05/19 01:01 AM
8

Those questions are on literally every form you ever have to fill out in anything academic. They all ask about your tribe? I didn't know. It’s not about race or gender Maybe they weren't too concerned about gender (Mr, Miss); but their question about race was very detailed.
/r/MensRights28/05/19 12:31 AM
22

It doesn't look like that. Their application form does ask about gender (Mr, Miss) but is most specific about ethnicity. https://ess.unm.edu/programs/ess-summer-programs/Revised%20ENERGYandUNITE%20Summer%20Program%20Application%20Packet.docx
/r/MensRights27/05/19 11:42 PM
12

How do you know you were not accepted because of being a white male? You can get a hint by looking at the Application Packet https://ess.unm.edu/programs/ess-summer-programs/Revised%20ENERGYandUNITE%20Summer%20Program%20Application%20Packet.docx which includes an "Ethnicity" question. They are interested in knowing if you are Native American/Alaskan Native (in which case, state your tribe); or maybe if you are Hispanic/Latino ; or maybe Pacific Islander/Hawaiian Native; or maybe African American…
/r/MensRights27/05/19 11:35 PM
2

I found an article with a different photo. That's a similar, but different, case. https://heavy.com/news/2019/03/yamile-uribe/ Apparently, there's a lot of it around.
/r/MensRights25/05/19 11:06 PM
20

"That was the worst part: When they came to the house, guns drawn, while my daughter was eating breakfast. We were getting ready to go to school on a typical Tuesday," said Frisby, 42, of Germantown. "My daughter was traumatized by that whole experience." What brought the law to his house that morning? Child-support debt. Frisby thinks of himself as an engaged dad, not a deadbeat. His daughter even lives with him half the week. But his child-support arrears now total about $19,000. Over the last…
/r/MensRights25/05/19 10:39 PM
2

The news has come as something of a surprise to demographers Here we can see the problem. "Something of a surprise" to the supposed experts, and the people in power. It's a sign that they have got it wrong, but will they wake up and do something effective? Nope... The latest birthrate data put the U.S. further away from a viable replacement rate — the standard for a generation being able to replicate its numbers. The U.S. has generally fallen short of that level since 1971, the CDC says. They've…
/r/MensRights24/05/19 11:06 PM
10

Interested in this shift! For Australia, see http://www.circumstitions.com/Australia.html particularly the graph "Circumcision in Australia 1943-84"
/r/MensRights21/05/19 03:07 AM
2

Reddit wrote that title for him? Or some someone else hacked his account and wrote that? The original post, the one which "has been causing quite a stir on Facebook today", the one which generated all the attention, does not mention feminism. It talks about "lots of women". Got that? Yes, the poster who copied it to this sub added the bit about feminism. That's just the opinion of one person, versus the many people that responded to the original post, which does not mention feminism. Clearly, he…
/r/MensRights21/05/19 01:37 AM
-13

That's been added in the title. The OP, however, says "lots of women".
/r/MensRights20/05/19 09:39 PM
-23

The OP doesn't mention feminism. It says "lots of women".
/r/MensRights20/05/19 09:21 PM
8

Harris’ plan would require companies to disclose pay policies while applying for a mandatory “Equal Pay Certification” from the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Companies that fail to achieve certification would be fined 1% of their profits for every 1% wage gap they allow to persist for work of equal value. How will "equal value" be determined? By the market? Or by Kamala Harris?
/r/MensRights20/05/19 12:10 PM
20

This “Us” vs “Them” mentality is not leading us anywhere productive nor appealing. It only leads down a path that leads to extreme suffering and destruction which nobody consciously wants. Wrong. There are entire organizations that want just that. The "divide and rule" method has been used forever, deliberately, whenever there was a requirement to attack the "other", for the purpose of stealing their stuff. The recommendations need another rule: watch out for this particular sort of manipulative…
/r/MensRights19/05/19 04:50 AM
10

Relevant links: https://futurism.com/the-byte/grow-babies-artificial-wombs ​ https://metro.co.uk/2019/05/14/human-babies-born-using-an-artificial-womb-possible-in-a-decade-8156458/
/r/MensRights18/05/19 12:39 PM
2

His entire interview with Derbyshire is well worth watching: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d6IGyPUvfz8 Exceeds Newman/Peterson, in my opinion.
/r/MensRights18/05/19 08:14 AM
1

LeanIn.org founder and Facebook COO Sheryl Sandberg calls the results "totally unacceptable." Those are the words and the attitude of an owner. Get to work right away, guys, The Boss has spoken.
/r/MensRights18/05/19 03:44 AM
1

LeanIn.org founder and Facebook COO Sheryl Sandberg calls the results "totally unacceptable." Those are the words and the attitude of an owner. Get to work right away, guys, The Boss has spoken.
/r/MensRights18/05/19 03:42 AM
1

LeanIn.org founder and Facebook COO Sheryl Sandberg calls the results "totally unacceptable." Those are the words and the attitude of an owner. Get to work right away, guys, The Boss has spoken.
/r/MensRights18/05/19 03:40 AM
1

LeanIn.org founder and Facebook COO Sheryl Sandberg calls the results "totally unacceptable." Those are the words and the attitude of an owner. Get to work right away, guys, The Boss has spoken.
/r/MensRights18/05/19 03:40 AM
1

LeanIn.org founder and Facebook COO Sheryl Sandberg calls the results "totally unacceptable." Those are the words and the attitude of an owner. Get to work right away, guys, The Boss has spoken.
/r/MensRights18/05/19 03:40 AM
1

LeanIn.org founder and Facebook COO Sheryl Sandberg calls the results "totally unacceptable." Those are the words and the attitude of an owner. Get to work right away, guys.
/r/MensRights18/05/19 03:39 AM
4

“Investigators suggest if it wasn’t for the actions of investigators in identifying and viewing the CCTV footage which clearly depicts the lies by Gray, that there would have been a strong likelihood that Mr Basic would have remained bail refused until the completion of this matter as well as the strong likelihood that Mr Basic would have been convicted and faced a term of imprisonment as a result of his conviction,” the statement of facts read. So, conviction on accusation is a "strong likeliho…
/r/MensRights17/05/19 03:18 AM
2

I think you're reaching I hope you're right
/r/MensRights16/05/19 09:47 PM
3

These two situations have almost nothing in common. Yes they do... The only significant commonality is that the female is the aggressor. And it was the male that was punished. Perhaps there are some issues of men's right here, would you say?
/r/MensRights16/05/19 09:02 PM
2

"Silly", eh. Here's a similar case, leading to a lawsuit. I'm sure the complainant, an expelled student, sees it as serious, not "silly". https://www.yahoo.com/lifestyle/expelled-columbia-journalism-student-accused-rape-sues-university-anti-male-bias-162059965.html a female acquaintance accused him of sexual assault while he was attending the Columbia University Graduate School of Journalism. According to Feibleman, the unidentified victim — a fellow Columbia student — was actually the aggressor…
/r/MensRights16/05/19 08:21 PM
2

The question for discussion was: Did he have the right to refuse, or is it him abusing her by denying sex?
/r/MensRights16/05/19 07:52 PM
2

Nothing like this is addressed in the article. It's your opportunity to discuss the matter.
/r/MensRights16/05/19 07:22 PM
4

Feminist Dating Advice is shit. Yep. Seems to go on and on and on, too. In the MGTOW texts, you can find a much pithier saying: Disregard women. Acquire currency. Seems to me that that will eventually lead to the ladies chasing you. If you want that, of course. Then it's a question of keeping the currency.
/r/MensRights16/05/19 09:34 AM
6

Starts off with a collection of unsupported assertions. Things are getting Worse and Worse! Behavioural Addiction (BA)! Pitfalls for a young man! Online computer games addiction (CGA) ! And internet porn addiction (IPA)! Both can be categorized as the Internet addictions (IA)!!! Furthermore, online porn also belongs to cybersex !!!!! CGA and IPA are considered to be BAs that arise when a person cannot resist behaviour that, despite the short-term satisfaction of an intense psychological need, ca…
/r/MensRights16/05/19 09:03 AM
2

Do they make gender swaps going the other way? A swapped "Pride and Prejudice" for instance?
/r/MensRights15/05/19 07:54 AM
2

Fascinating story. Well worth the watch.
/r/MensRights15/05/19 05:30 AM
23

a feminist and not just someone who escaped from a mental institution Difficult to tell apart though.
/r/MensRights13/05/19 10:10 PM
2

Any examples of this happening? James Damour's dismissal from Google fits into step 3.
/r/MensRights13/05/19 05:20 AM
11

Link to text: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7008173/Rape-charged-dropped-woman-realises-FORGOT-consented-having-sex-man.html
/r/MensRights12/05/19 10:00 AM
4

The text she is reading: https://shrink4men.com/2018/11/26/why-dont-men-leave-abusive-women/
/r/MensRights12/05/19 09:54 AM
10

Courts would no longer be forced to consider equal time for both parents and a new system of state courts would be set up, as part of the biggest proposed overhaul of the family law system since the Family Court was created almost 45 years ago. In a 583-page report released yesterday, the Australian Law Reform Commission warned federal family courts “may no longer be fit for purpose” and said the existing model, in which litigants bounced between federal and state courts, “fails to meet the need…
/r/MensRights12/05/19 09:48 AM
5

'[She] comes to the middle of China Town with her heels in her hand and stabs me in the crown of my head,' Mr Johns said. '[I'm] devastated to be honest. If the roles were reversed would I be getting the same, pretty much a slap on the wrist?' https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7007977/Party-girl-stabbed-stranger-head-STILETTO-random-unprovoked-attack.html
/r/MensRights11/05/19 07:03 AM
8

Here is a quiz of the ASI This is a criticism of their quiz, rather than the scale. It doesn't allow neutral responses. Not only is there no "don't know", or "insufficient information" response allowed, there is no neutral point in any response. You are allowed only to be one way or the other. Suppose you really don't know, or you really do know, but really do have a neutral view? Too bad. You could leave the answer blank in those cases, but then it refuses to submit your form. Subtle censorship…
/r/MensRights11/05/19 06:46 AM
6

Talvitie further explained that the organization’s mission is to persuade medical groups to end all genital mutilation of both boys and girls, though the protests shockingly focus on males Bizarre wording here. Is it shocking that they focus on males (bizarre because that's where all the genital cutting is, in the US). Or is she referring to the red crotch paint as "shocking" (which it is) ... but in that case, wouldn't it apply to females too?
/r/MensRights11/05/19 05:47 AM
3

Now they want money What a surprise!
/r/MensRights10/05/19 06:06 PM
9

The simple explanation is that the 1% families have enough income so that the wife can indulge her preference, which is to stay home and spend the money earned by their husbands, aka "managing the household". How they manage to do this, while themselves being unpaid, is a mystery forever unsolvable by the feminist investigators. The husband, though, has to work; it's just really, really unfair that he's the one to get paid, not her.
/r/MensRights08/05/19 02:33 PM
8

Police are investigating comments by a Ukip candidate in the European elections speculating about whether he would rape the MP Jess Phillips amid growing concern over threats to politicians. Sargon has entered politics, as in elections, so now the mass media is after him. Any mention of [trigger warning, sensitive people please avert your eyes] rape, in any context at all, is a gift to them from heaven, or somewhere. There will be intense scrutiny, going years back, then attempts to link it to e…
/r/MensRights08/05/19 01:48 PM
1

Feminism told women to abandon being a housewife and find a job. Corporations realized that if women were to look for jobs, the market for workers would double, and based on the principle of supply and demand , the cost of a worker would be halved . In this view, the cause is a deliberate strategy by corporations. But it's possible to argue for a purely economic reason as the cause. Technology made working in the house not so valuable. Washing machines, fridges, precooked dinners, ready-made clo…
/r/MensRights07/05/19 02:12 PM
4

Doll.
/r/MensRights07/05/19 08:40 AM
3

Remember, you horny. Piece of dirt girls are made...
/r/MensRights07/05/19 08:39 AM
11

Apart from the revelation that Reddit mods are 13, this is what stood out for me: I counseled patience, naively unprepared for what came next: when he found people to talk to on Reddit and 4chan. Those online pals were happy to explain that all girls lie—especially about rape. And they had lots more knowledge to impart. They told Sam that Islam is an inherently violent religion and that Jews run global financial networks. (We’re Jewish and don’t know anyone who runs anything, but I guess the evi…
/r/MensRights07/05/19 08:26 AM
48

The problems started when Sam was 13 and was accused of sexual harassment during first period at school. Well, there you are. False accusations of sexual harassment are a gateway into the Alt-Right! The girl at the next table overhears your private conversation; next, the Inevitable Nazi is sucking you into your computer!!! It all started with the false accusation. Don't do it! Don't enable it!
/r/MensRights07/05/19 06:02 AM
195

IT'S NOT THE SIZE THAT COUNTS, IT'S ... NO, WAIT, SIZE DOES COUNT. It's all that chocolate.
/r/MensRights07/05/19 03:42 AM
27

No good deed goes unpunished. Mr Basic said the incident has deterred him from stopping and helping a young woman ever again.
/r/MensRights06/05/19 01:46 PM
14

It seems like it's the slights on feminism that are upsetting you. Why not just ignore those posts and give yourself a happier time? There's a lot of other stuff to read about here.
/r/MensRights06/05/19 01:13 PM
2

Women must realize that chivalry is not a bad thing. In the world of increased female independence and feminism, some women take on the belief that they don’t need a man to hold open their door, pull out their chair, or walk on the street side of the sidewalk. They must realize that allowing a man to take part in these actions is not a sign of feminine weakness, instead allowing a man to showcase these mannerisms demonstrates strength. They're not trying to tell women what to do, are they? What …
/r/MensRights05/05/19 02:29 AM
1

LOL Should have been flaired "humor".
/r/MensRights05/05/19 02:16 AM
2

Paid domestic violence leave. Good grief. Better get your annual ten days in, ladies... each and every year. It's your entitlement after all. Who's paying? "We're sorting that out with the employers". What towering pillars of virtue these two men are. Outdoing any women, for sure.
/r/MensRights05/05/19 01:56 AM
2

Perhaps it's just running on from the nonsensical nature of the original quote. See some nonsense, come up with more nonsense along the same lines. feminism is the radical idea that women's safety is more important than men's feelings Does Men's Feelings mean the same thing as Women's Safety? Is " Men's Feelings" not a part of "Human Feelings?" Are men not human? It's a cheap rhetorical extension on the theme of "Feminism is the radical notion that women are people" (Cheris Kramarae and Paula Tr…
/r/MensRights04/05/19 03:46 AM
3

Some men may have trouble with self-care because independence and self-sufficiency are usually associated with male role expectations. This is self-contradictory. Self-sufficiency and self-care are aligned, surely.
/r/MensRights04/05/19 03:05 AM
3

It works, too.
/r/MensRights03/05/19 10:56 PM
2

Another news article, with the same photo of her: https://www.newsweek.com/utah-woman-accused-feeding-boyfriend-drano-so-he-would-go-eternal-sleep-1413744 That article also lists a few other cases of woman administered poisonings. Seems like there's a fair bit of it around.
/r/MensRights03/05/19 10:48 PM
1

Nah, "silly" was a better description. Very silly.
/r/MensRights03/05/19 10:36 PM
1

How is this a men’s rights issue Oh, another one. Try this, jorfed: it supports rape survivors which includes men and women When you see the phrase rape survivor what image comes to mind? A man or a woman? Similarly, the phrase combat veteran. If in either case you are as likely to see a man, or a woman, then indeed there is no issue and nothing at all to discuss. Which, I suspect, is just how you would like it.
/r/MensRights03/05/19 10:34 PM
1

The link is bad. Better link: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6990563/Controversial-digital-strip-search-plans-asking-rape-victims-hand-phones-scrapped.html
/r/MensRights03/05/19 10:18 PM
1

it should be "Does this have any effect on men's rights? No? "No" is your answer. Other answers are available. we just fundamentally disagree with what is relevant to men's rights and what isn't So, a relevant topic to discuss. "I am being treated differently than others purely because I am male" The men and women in the camp were treated totally differently.
/r/MensRights30/04/19 01:48 PM
1

an imaginary version of you " Nothing you said was in good faith. " Not a scam. Most of your argument comes down to this assertion. It depends on how far back you want to look for the deception which is one of the the essential ingredients of "scam". First you scam them into believing that there is something innately wrong with maleness; and then of course they are entirely free to decide to take your quite expensive offer to fix themselves. The other essential ingredient of "scam" is "profit". …
/r/MensRights30/04/19 12:56 PM
2

author's tends to be a bit cringey Understated. She gushes (Forget Bumble and Tinder, ya’ll! I found the husband hideout!)
/r/MensRights30/04/19 12:10 PM
1

Can I ask how this post has anything to do with men's rights? It's a very common question. Gets asked about all sorts of posts. In this instance, how about the right to a fair price for having masculinity explained to you. Almost $900! A bit steep, if you ask me. Oh, you didn't ask me, you asked a mod; but then, I don't charge $900 for my explanations. Who's rights were infringed? The poor saps, all men, who were suckered into this fancy resource extraction scheme. All men. As far as I can see t…
/r/MensRights30/04/19 11:47 AM
20

Here's a link to their website: https://womenteachmen.com/ojai/ "Women teach men."
/r/MensRights29/04/19 08:04 PM
20

unless he has some issues with not being able to pull it back!!! This should not be possible until puberty. Forcible retraction before that may tear the underlying tissue and could cause problems. Don't do it.
/r/MensRights27/04/19 07:11 AM
11

Gender Studies Professor ... and also a writer, critic, and multi-media artist, according to her website. As if any of that gives her special insight into the condition of men; more special than any other member of the public that is. But she does have a deeper voice than her interviewer. Maybe that helps.
/r/MensRights25/04/19 11:42 AM
2

This is just a speculation: that men have an inbuilt mechanism that monitors how useful they are to the other people around them. When the perceived usefulness goes negative, they off themselves. I've known only two male suiciders well enough to say this, and that's not too much data, but the thing I noticed emanating from both of them was not depression, but an air of introspection, of abstraction, like they were reflecting on some sort of internal debate. In neither case did I suspect they wer…
/r/MensRights25/04/19 10:52 AM
37

I wonder if they ever served Sour Grapes, back when they were in business.
/r/MensRights25/04/19 10:14 AM
1

The art is a reference to "To Serve Man" an episode of 'The Twilight Zone' original series which itself was based on the 1950 short story "To Serve Man" by Damon Knight. Back then, it was universally understood that "Man" was inclusive of both men and women, so Knight's joke had women on the menu too. Until the feminists got hold of it...
/r/MensRights25/04/19 09:56 AM
0

I'm not seeing how exactly this is a men's rights issue? It's a men's issue though. It has a direct effect on men's place in society. Rather important, you could say fundamental, actually. What exactly going on here? You don't want the issue to be discussed. You can't easily object on the grounds that it doesn't concern "men", so you try to imply that we shouldn't discuss it because it isn't "rights". You are diverting the discussion to a legalistic, pedantic examination of the language "men's r…
/r/MensRights24/04/19 09:35 PM
37

One possible reason is that women disproportionately engage in malicious gossip, in-group.
/r/MensRights23/04/19 10:42 AM
1

If he was negligent he definitely deserves jail time The attitude here, which a common one, you hear it all the time, is that he had, or should have had, enough control of his wife to do something about it. He failed in his duty to control his wife, therefore it's all his fault. "Doing something" means applying sufficient force, and could escalate to violence. To see this, think about what happens when the police "do something". However, any violence, or any force, for a man, against a woman, is…
/r/MensRights21/04/19 06:14 AM
3

what can we do Be more skeptical in the investigation process; require corroboration other than word of mouth. Enforce a ban on revealing the identity of the accused, equal to that currently protecting the accuser. Make public sexual innuendos of the MeToo variety prosecutable like slanders and libel are, with the State funding the prosecution, the criterion being provable objective truth. Change the existing system away from encouraging lies and liars.
/r/MensRights20/04/19 09:15 PM
1

Feminist mod's stickied comment: level 1homo_redditorensisFeministScore hidden·22 hours ago·Stickied comment·edited 21 hours ago We have some brigading in the comments and voting manipulation. Please report trolls and This is what happens when you do a direct link to the Feminism sub, without using "np" (non participation) in place of "www" in the link. You are gifting them ammunition. Don't do it.
/r/MensRights18/04/19 11:35 PM
11

Need to be careful here. Here's a comment in the physics sub: https://np.reddit.com/r/Physics/comments/bc051p/katie_bouman_did_a_tedx_talk_on_how_to_take_a/eknhmq5?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x which ends up with this remark: There are probably men's rights activists getting mad, but these are the kind of people who violently object to women getting cast in movies and shouldn't be paid attention to. Another comment in the same thread: https://np.reddit.com/r/Physics/comments/bc051p/katie_bou…
/r/MensRights12/04/19 03:35 AM
3

her contribution is both being over-hyped in relation to the rest of the project, and at the same time, it is being asserted the her contributions are being downplayed. The pendulum starts to swing in the opposite direction. Gotta love it, yes? Yes. So long as it doesn't go too far.
/r/MensRights12/04/19 03:21 AM
1

Those initial photos are pretty much reasonable to start with. A better test would be recovering pixelated text.
/r/MensRights11/04/19 01:27 PM
12

It takes a team Katie Bouman makes this point herself, in her TED talk just after 12 minute mark: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BIvezCVcsYs
/r/MensRights11/04/19 01:19 PM
7

race Conservative black men are the least sexist, according to the graph anyway.
/r/MensRights11/04/19 01:13 PM
1

the former theorizes the data first and then sees if it is in the real data. The best thing would be a clear, unambiguous prediction. The problem comes when it's not clear,and the results are still buried in the noise. Have you heard of N-Rays? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/N_ray Better, clearer, repeatable measurements are the answer.
/r/MensRights11/04/19 12:51 PM
1

It's like Mars, now we have pictures from the surface. All those YouTube videos about finding alien lifeforms, statues of people, machine parts, and so on. And, the examples they show do look convincing. Then you notice they tend to be in debris fields full of similar looking stuff; there's so much of it that the chances are you'll eventually find what you're looking for. There's no getting away from the fact that the team had a general understanding of what a black hole should look like, arrive…
/r/MensRights11/04/19 12:26 PM
3

Yes, it was watching her TED talk that gave me the sudden sense of disappointment. Just like the gravitational waves... Bigger and better detectors are the answer, IMO. Probably in orbit. In their group presentation, they say that receivers in orbit would sweep out much bigger baselines.
/r/MensRights11/04/19 12:10 PM
1

could somebody tell me why it’s not okay that I’m glad I was circumcised? Where has somebody told you it's not okay for you to be glad that you were circumcised?
/r/MensRights11/04/19 11:25 AM
2

Just think about the photos you take with your camera phone — they have certain properties. … If you know what one pixel is, you have a good guess as to what the pixel is next to it.” I wonder about this. Doesn't it lead to you seeing what you expect to see? Reminds me of the detection of gravitational waves from colliding black holes, and the very impressive audio it made when slowed down. The gloss came off when they revealed they didn't actually detect that audio; instead they searched for wh…
/r/MensRights11/04/19 10:21 AM
13

We can meet with your baby’s father to explain the adoption process, help him understand your adoption decision and provide the support he needs to get on board with your adoption plan. If he is still opposed to the adoption after meeting with your counselor, we can provide legal assistance to identify your options for moving forward without his consent. That's called rape these days.
/r/MensRights10/04/19 01:12 PM
3

They have a homologous structure.
/r/MensRights10/04/19 10:49 AM
8

For some reason, it's illegal to apply that modern medicine to baby girl's genitals. Are you arguing that they should continue to suffer this injustice?
/r/MensRights10/04/19 10:46 AM
1

Maybe you don't disagree with me as much as you think? LOL
/r/MensRights10/04/19 04:06 AM
1

I also try to avoid thinking of feminism as "the opposition". A common sentiment. When it's posted here, it exhibits as a big concern for feminism, but men's rights as an afterthought. For example, look at the number of words devoted to each subject by you in this thread. It's basically all about feminism; which isn't the main topic of this sub at all. The ridicule - against feminism - in the OP is what prompted you to post, in my opinion. For all the harm they've done (and continue to do) the v…
/r/MensRights10/04/19 03:02 AM
5

Ad agency BBDO Argentina created the "Consent Pack" for Tulipán. The box can only be opened if four hands simultaneously press buttons on each side of the box, unlocking the condom inside. "He threatened to beat me unless I helped him open the box" The condom is not meant to be a solution to sexual assault, because she could be forced into assisting but rather to spread the important message of consent in all circumstances. Really? Let's see... . The Next Web reports that the "Consent Pack" is a…
/r/MensRights09/04/19 11:39 PM
5

Am I wrong? You are.
/r/MensRights09/04/19 11:18 PM
2

just a general anti-feminism Feminism is part of the opposition. You don't ignore the opposition if you want to get anywhere. Your complaint is a common one. I suspect the reasoning that lies behind it is feminism=women, and opposing women violates basic instincts. But feminism=women is not true.
/r/MensRights09/04/19 11:13 PM
1

monetary compensation. If she has enough money. The State definitely does have enough money, and they got it wrong, so they should be paying the compensation to him. Then trying to recover it from her, if they can.
/r/MensRights09/04/19 11:00 PM
19

You foreskin weirdos The foreskin is the natural default, you know. are welcome to your choices/fears Because having it is the default, the active choice is to cut it off. You are trying to reverse accountability in your argument. to keep your smegma factories Hysteria intensifies... but to make it seem like circumcision is some conspiracy against men is what I take issue with. In the circumcising societies, and the US is a prime example, it is the general understanding. Your use of "conspiracy"…
/r/MensRights09/04/19 10:35 PM
5

Instead someone told me my parents should go to jail for having me circumcised. What is your reaction to this: https://edition.cnn.com/2019/03/08/uk/fgm-uk-sentencing-scli-intl-gbr/index.html Woman jailed for 11 years for performing FGM on her 3-year-old daughter A judge has sentenced a 37-year-old Ugandan woman to 11 years in jail for performing female genital mutilation (FGM) on her three-year-old daughter, the UK's Press Association (PA) news agency reported. The defendant was found guilty of…
/r/MensRights08/04/19 11:03 PM
5

No longer legal It's still a bill (at time of publication, in January) The bill will be published alongside government research that calculated the social and economic costs of domestic abuse as totalling more than £34,000 per individual victim, or £66bn per year. The amount was calculated by looking at the costs of protective and preventative measures, the consequences and the response by police and the wider justice system. These costs are all caused by the system itself. IOW, decide what you'…
/r/MensRights08/04/19 09:37 PM
70

will they ignore it? The paper was published in 2015. https://www.pnas.org/content/early/2015/04/08/1418878112.abstract So it looks like it's being ignored.
/r/MensRights08/04/19 08:00 AM
32

The girl, known as M is proceedings as she cannot be named, first made the allegations about her relative to a counsellor These "counsellors" have a lot to answer for. in 2016, when she was 14. M told the counsellor that she realised that her grandfather’s behaviour was wrong only after attending sex education classes at school when she was in year eight. The counsellor reported the conversation to the police, The "counsellor" kicks off the process which is set up to go in only one direction. wh…
/r/MensRights07/04/19 11:14 PM
5

​ YouTube star Olivia Jade Giannulli apparently knew about her parents’ scheme to buy her way into the University of Southern California and would have stopped it–if she knew they’d get caught, according to a new report. “She would have never gone along with it if she thought this would happen,” an unnamed source told People magazine. There you are, women can be sensible after all!
/r/MensRights06/04/19 08:37 PM
0

Must be from the Gillette school of advertising. Watch out for the new CHEST HAIRS brand of lingerie, celebrating POWER each day every day, in Women's Wonderfulness Year!
/r/MensRights06/04/19 08:28 PM
3

"Unfortunately, as false accusations are becoming more prevalent in today's social media driven society, we are losing our grasp on 'presumed innocent until proven guilty,' and Mr. Zayan has been tried around the world by the court of public opinion," Zayan's public defender attorney, Michelle Protzman, said in a statement Thursday to The Associated Press. Slowly, it begins to seep into the general consciousness.
/r/MensRights06/04/19 08:15 PM
7

RESPONDENT: Well, you have to tell me about it. PLAINTIFF: Well, we got back from Home Depot and - - RESPONDENT: About what time? PLAINTIFF: It was, I'm not really sure about the time. It might've been around maybe one, two o'clock. And we did have sex against my will, but I'm not pressing charges against it. RESPONDENT: Right. But you have to tell me what happened. PLAINTIFF: Well, he - - RESPONDENT: I understand that you're not pressing charges, but that's not what we're dealing with here. PLA…
/r/MensRights06/04/19 07:22 PM
1

See "Pensioner who beat partially paralysed husband to death with a pole cleared of murder" https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/b8l7uo/pensioner_who_beat_partially_paralysed_husband_to/ ​
/r/MensRights06/04/19 03:14 AM
1

Two years, four months. https://www.newhamrecorder.co.uk/news/crime-court/pensioner-jailed-for-killing-abusive-husband-1-5980453 ​
/r/MensRights06/04/19 03:07 AM
2

Because men and women are actually different, a clear, physical, animal difference that leads to naturally different paths in life, the concept of "equality" should not be interpreted as "sameness". It should be seen as an overall balance taking into account both physical and social factors. You need an intimate appreciation of a society, with all its tradeoffs, to properly judge such social factors as "oppression" and "privilege". Like having been born into it, growing up in it, and living in i…
/r/MensRights05/04/19 09:37 PM
16

That's how myths get created. Facts are better.
/r/MensRights05/04/19 09:14 PM
89

When coercive control was added to the statute books, it recognised something that victims of domestic violence had been explaining for decades: that the physical assaults were “not the worst of it”. Killing someone with a hammer seems pretty bad to me. These "victims of domestic violence", on the other hand, are not only alive, but well enough to indulge in convincing explanations; convincing enough to get written into the law. I suppose the equivalent excuse for a man who beat his wife to deat…
/r/MensRights05/04/19 09:02 PM
51

When a Google employee was fired for writing a memo that women may be too emotional to be coders Damore didn't write that. Are you deliberately trying to look like a bigot?
/r/MensRights05/04/19 08:29 PM
8

They have covered themselves. Right at the bottom of their article, there is a note: Pay gap v equal pay The gender pay gap is not the same as unequal pay. Unequal pay is giving women less than men for the same work. That has been against the law since the Equal Pay Act was introduced in 1970. A company's gender pay gap can also be caused by other things, for example fewer women in senior or highly-paid roles or more women in part-time jobs. ​
/r/MensRights05/04/19 09:00 AM
4

she will now become the fourth largest Amazon shareholder and is now worth $35.6bn (£27bn), making her the third richest woman in the world. Mr Bezos retains 75pc of their Amazon shares, worth around $97.5 billion (£74.61bn) $97.5 billion - $35.6bn = $61.9bn For every dollar he got, she got only $0.37 !!! Anyone doubting the enormous pay gap women labor under, please note. ​
/r/MensRights05/04/19 07:23 AM
2

NiemanLab Who? And what do they do? Each year, we ask some of the smartest people in journalism and digital media what they think is coming in the next 12 months. Oh. ROBERT HERNANDEZ Who? Robert Hernandez is a web journalism professor at USC Annenberg. Oh. we will replace you. Who cares? We don't read you anyway.
/r/MensRights03/04/19 11:11 PM
2

The instructor ( Christopher E. Forth ) has written about obesity: On Fat: A Cultural History of the Stuff of Life Goal: My current project is a cultural history of “fat” in the West, which I conceptualize in terms of visuality (bodies that appear large and/or differently shaped), tactility (bodies that feel/seem “soft” and “flabby”) as well as materiality (bodies that call to mind the ambiguous qualities of “fatty” or “oily” substances). By examining the shifting relationship between these and …
/r/MensRights03/04/19 07:05 PM
3

in some situations they can be gained for the wrong reasons. but they still have a chance to explain their side. This is the subject of the video. The retired cop says it started off reasonably, but steadily got worse. This is a well known positive feedback process, aka "give an inch, take a mile". Also who profits in this situation? i don't think either party does. Agree. Both parties lose, and other parties, like the kids, lose worst. But in the initial perception, she wins the house, the cash…
/r/MensRights03/04/19 11:49 AM
3

It's the standard model though. Initial claim (ADVO issued automatically, not criminal); then ADVO broken (any way you can manage, guy kicked out of house, a criminal); then profit.
/r/MensRights03/04/19 11:30 AM
6

if they breach the conditions if they are manipulated into breaching the conditions
/r/MensRights03/04/19 10:39 AM
2

Ramanathan, of Burges Road, East Ham, denied murder and was cleared of the charge. She had earlier admitted manslaughter. She will be sentenced for the manslaughter on Friday.
/r/MensRights02/04/19 09:47 PM
1

They don't really think that. Otherwise they wouldn't have chosen that particular photo to use on the site's front page.
/r/MensRights02/04/19 09:43 PM
2

a metaphor ... so how we see it is a matter of interpretation. Art, you know. We can all metaphor along with the best of them. It raises questions. Why are these men letting the women walk all over them? Other replies ITT suggest a measure of fetishism. Those incorrigible men no doubt, been at it for thousands of years.
/r/MensRights01/04/19 10:10 PM
5

Dunno, I wasn't around for thousands of years. That picture was recent, though. ​
/r/MensRights01/04/19 09:35 PM
4

women might someday stand shoulder to shoulder with men No, the picture showed them walking all over men. Maybe you need a new pair of glasses.
/r/MensRights01/04/19 09:27 PM
1

'I cannot think of any more obviously fundamental human right than the right of a man to have sex with his wife - and the right of the State to monitor that,' he said. So, a judicial pronouncement on the State as a voyeur. Since we're being so legalistic on sex and consent and so on, maybe the Judge could go on to outline exactly how far the State's rights extend in the field of other sexual perversions. A long way, I suspect.
/r/MensRights01/04/19 08:55 PM
18

The article says they didn't free her. No, it didn't say whether she had been freed or not. They convicted her of manslaughter. Yes. And she's going to prison at age 73. She hasn't been sentenced yet.
/r/MensRights01/04/19 07:57 PM
5

​ NASA, in their own words: https://www.nasa.gov/feature/spacewalk-reassignments-what-s-the-deal/ ​
/r/MensRights29/03/19 08:36 PM
1

I'm surprised that the crown even put her on trial. Maybe because she could be expected to get very little sympathy because of how she looks. If the CPS is trying to deflect attention from their antimale bias , then this would be the way to do it.
/r/MensRights29/03/19 08:06 PM
1

Here's a different perspective. https://www.jemmabeale.info/ ​ It was illuminating to me to notice my own reaction. ​
/r/MensRights29/03/19 07:37 PM
1

Tsk. Haven't you heard of intersectionality?
/r/MensRights29/03/19 07:40 AM
6

very young boys (ages 0-3) who will ideally grow up without ever questioning women's equality. Or else...
/r/MensRights29/03/19 07:24 AM
18

Beale claimed she was raped by nine men and sexually assaulted by six, all strangers, in four encounters spanning three years. ​ https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-london-41060237 ​
/r/MensRights29/03/19 06:21 AM
2

Guess it must be smartphone friendly. Us old guys with our separate screens and neanderthal keyboards are soon to be only of archaeological interest.
/r/MensRights28/03/19 09:45 PM
1

A surprisingly intelligent profile of Jordan Peterson, including a surprisingly intelligent recognition of men's issues. "Intelligent" in the Women's Way of Knowing sense. He's got the attention of a bunch of professional, charismatic, well-dressed men with good watches and no wedding rings; must be good. ​
/r/MensRights28/03/19 09:38 PM
1

That's the one that came to mind, yes. It must have been the result of some thought process of his, the same place that his other stuff comes from.
/r/MensRights28/03/19 09:25 PM
2

Well, there was the pathetic weasels thing. He did apologize for that, but he still carries the process that got him there.
/r/MensRights28/03/19 08:59 PM
4

Make us pay. With accrued interest, rate set by the general outrage level.
/r/MensRights24/03/19 08:58 PM
2

a conference about rape at my job Is the subject matter of your job relevant to the rape thing in any way, or is it otherwise unrelated virtue signalling?
/r/MensRights24/03/19 08:49 PM
8

With accrued interest of 10 percent a year, what would have been a total payment of some $30,000 is now more than $170,000. Nice rate if you can get it. And you can, if you just make it up.
/r/MensRights24/03/19 08:36 PM
139

The US legal system. A stinking mass of corruption.
/r/MensRights23/03/19 04:50 PM
3

A crap attempt at "humor". Overdone.
/r/MensRights22/03/19 10:31 AM
21

John Hembling's recommendations: Rule 1: cut off contact with your false accuser. Rule 2 : cut off contact with your false accuser Rule 3 : Don’t apologise Rule 4: Cut off contact with your accuser’s collaborators Rule 5: Measure your friends, and relatives (those who don't have your back have got to go) Rule 6: If the accusation was precipitated by a known event – such as a fight, or a break up. Get a written statement from every person who was witness to that event Rule 7: Write your own factu…
/r/MensRights22/03/19 10:26 AM
5

xoJane was bought out and replaced. https://www.xojane.com/issues/domestic-violence-shelters-for-men ^ this was an article where a feminist wanted less shelters for men. xoJane and xoVain were acquired by Time Inc. from Pratt and SAY Media in 2015.[9] In December 2016, Time indicated that it would be folding xoJane into InStyle, following reports that Pratt was leaving Time and looking for a new owner for her web properties.[10] In 2016, a statement from Time said that the site would redirect to…
/r/MensRights22/03/19 02:39 AM
17

Woman can use embryos without ex-husband's consent So, it's rape.
/r/MensRights22/03/19 01:10 AM
3

how can men protect themselves in an event of a false accusation? John Hembling's recommendations: Rule 1: cut off contact with your false accuser. Rule 2 : cut off contact with your false accuser Rule 3 : Don’t apologise Rule 4: Cut off contact with your accuser’s collaborators Rule 5: Measure your friends, and relatives (those who don't have your back have got to go) Rule 6: If the accusation was precipitated by a known event – such as a fight, or a break up. Get a written statement from every…
/r/MensRights21/03/19 05:05 AM
3

This is a feminist propaganda piece, packed full of direct and indirect lies. This is what they are pushing in schools these days? I hope modern schoolchildren have the intellectual strength to see though these lies. The adults obviously don't.
/r/MensRights21/03/19 01:33 AM
4

'You admitted you were being greedy and excited when you were scamming these people. You were controlling these men, that's why this is a very serious offence.' Coercive control of men by women. Who'd have thought?
/r/MensRights20/03/19 07:38 PM
4

how in gods name does somebody rent poon that fucking ugly? From the article: Shannon Lee, 21, from Netley Abbey near Southampton, would pose as another woman, whose photos she stole from the Internet, ​
/r/MensRights20/03/19 07:29 PM
1

Meanwhile 100% of our apprentices and trades people are male, but there have not been any calls to force women into those low paying roles You're thinking of the good old days. https://www.theguardian.com/higher-education-network/2019/mar/02/apprenticeships-should-be-used-to-improve-equality Unfair share of trainee places is given to white boys, warns report Equality body calls for boost to diversity in job training in UK Employers need to reserve places on apprenticeship schemes for young women…
/r/MensRights14/03/19 11:17 AM
12

Here we have female judges attributing motivations to men. Hmm. Or does the perceived masculinity of the victim affect the sympathy she gets?
/r/MensRights13/03/19 10:49 PM
8

I'm saying you live in fear of women and that's sad. Male suicide is a serious problem, more serious than your sadness about my fears of women, I think. Don't let it disturb you so much that you off yourself though. No, don't do that.
/r/MensRights12/03/19 09:10 PM
1

How does that ruin the point she is trying to make? The mechanism of "sarcasm" is to quote something with approval that is either obviously false, or that you will see is false after the sarcastic statement brings it to your attention. That's where the sarcastic burn comes from. It would have worked if MGM is generally seen as bodily harm, as it is in this sub. But in the US that's not the case - it's generally accepted, approved of even, and various specious arguments are cooked up in its favor…
/r/MensRights12/03/19 08:55 PM
8

it's more about Fuck Women. It's about a male suicide, actually.
/r/MensRights12/03/19 08:31 PM
1

the tweet is sarcastic It's an attempt at sarcasm, but it fails because it's off-target. Involuntary male genital mutilation is legal and common in the US. This ruins the point she is trying to make - the parallel fails - and in fact informs us about not only her hypocrisy, but yours as well.
/r/MensRights12/03/19 08:24 PM
2

I thought it was a piece of satire until I read that Beethoven’s Ninth Symphony was a rape tune. Why had I never seen that before? And those men, always obsessing about their organs: The large and erect pipes, often on naked display, are sexual symbols of virile manhood. Some of them in that picture are truly huge. I'm humbled. But I just can't stop myself from the chance for a mansplanation. " Viva Ann Foul, Bishop of Bristle", eh. Any halfway literate person would know it should be "Bristols".
/r/MensRights10/03/19 10:32 AM
3

Lying, self deceptive reasoning: Jeremy Clarkson: "They just aren’t giving jobs to men at the moment ... We just, as men, have to accept we’ve had it. Let’s just go down the bar.” And then she writes: And, increasingly, powerful groups of men are going to the pub or to network on the golf course without the women, excluding them once again from the inner circles where decisions are made. If they're out of a job, they're not "powerful" and they're not excluding anyone; they are the ones who have …
/r/MensRights09/03/19 08:14 PM
4

Women's day: pathetic. Women's month: hardly much better. Women's year: now you're talking! All day, every day, morning, noon, and night! And when it's all over, it's next year already! https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/07/opinion/sunday/international-womens-day.html ​
/r/MensRights08/03/19 04:40 AM
1

I'm not an MRA bud. We can tell. Feel free to waste your time crying over shit that will never change You wish.
/r/MensRights07/03/19 10:28 PM
6

there is no activism on this sub. Rubbish. Just opposing the standard women myths is uphill work, comes with costs, and is activism. Still, please do demonstrate to the rest of us just what you mean by doing some yourself. Report back here. And be snappy about it. ​
/r/MensRights07/03/19 08:44 PM
2

Hodgson said that ‘interrogating victims of sexual assault and compelling them to defend themselves and their actions in the aftermath will not be tolerated in mainstream broadcasting’, before adding, of course, that ‘this is not a matter of crushing free speech’. Crushing free speech is exactly what it is. Lying, as usual.
/r/MensRights06/03/19 03:12 PM
1

The book is the evidence.
/r/MensRights05/03/19 06:29 PM
4

At last. Pure, documented evidence that one man is worth almost as much as 32 women. ​ I read it in the Mail on Sunday so I know it's true.
/r/MensRights04/03/19 02:26 AM
3

A failed attempt to undo their mess. It's crude and tone deaf. Are they still using feminists to construct their propaganda?
/r/MensRights02/03/19 07:18 PM
1

I’m crafting a counter punch Mistake. This will reinforce your connection to these troublemakers and just increase your chances of getting into more grief. You should concentrate your efforts on cutting off all contact with them, and also the people you know in common.
/r/MensRights27/02/19 08:59 PM
32

Rachel Kane, former president of the university’s Parliamentary Debate Society, and her former lieutenant, Joey Schnide, said that they had to “create spaces where gender minorities ... Men are one of the minorities at universities, compared to women. ... minorities can find support, meet mentors and peers Men can find support, meet mentors and peers? ... sounds good. and feel empowered by seeing successful women.” Men feeling something by seeing women??? Can only be a coded reference to porn. N…
/r/MensRights25/02/19 04:37 AM
1

See also "False Accuser Fails to destroy an Innocent Man" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kKx9rubjV9A Today, A man whose family have lived under the cloud of a false accusation, and the threat of prison got his life back. Acquitted of all 3 false accusations! ​
/r/MensRights24/02/19 08:39 AM
8

A female robot cannot say no to something that the man wants Saying no to something that the man wants. That's what's at the bottom of the relationship between the sexes, Swedish style. A moment of unguarded honesty from a resource extractor. ​ The ladies - sweet emotional things that they are - will hang on to this lever to the end.
/r/MensRights23/02/19 08:25 PM
1

Can I protest female sex toys No ​
/r/MensRights22/02/19 01:00 AM
2

She was "convicted and discharged", that is, no jail or suchlike. The actual penalty seems to have been making her repent (or trying to), with a "restorative justice" session with her victim; and her actual naming, a rare thing indeed.
/r/MensRights20/02/19 09:03 PM
1

An earlier report (September last year), while interim name suppression was still in effect: https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/crime/107328867/woman-makes-up-rape-story-wastes-significant-hours-of-police-time ​ ​
/r/MensRights20/02/19 08:42 PM
2

LOL That woman is a pay gap all by herself.
/r/MensRights20/02/19 08:26 PM
1

its a government failing on this issue Well, I can agree with that.
/r/MensRights20/02/19 08:04 PM
1

her high horse The judge is a man (David Ruth).
/r/MensRights20/02/19 06:33 PM
2

Becoming a mother isn't simply a choice a women makes it's a choice a couple make But not a choice the company makes. Yet the government's intervention is directed towards the company. Please think about it. What could the company do? Forbid its female employees to become mothers perhaps? Assigning responsibility where there is no power to affect the outcome is always the sign of a scam. ​
/r/MensRights20/02/19 06:28 PM
8

Research for the Government Equalities Office also queries how meaningful many companies' plans to close the pay gap are. Campaigners say concrete initiatives and cultural change are needed. The pay gap really opens up when women become mothers. Yet the Equalities and Human Rights Commission found that a third of employers assume mothers are less interested in career progression. Becoming a mother is a personal choice a woman makes. She decides. Therefore, she is responsible for the consequences…
/r/MensRights20/02/19 08:27 AM
22

Unusual: A woman who made a false rape claim has lost her bid for final name suppression, As usual: The false allegation added to the difficulties faced by genuine rape victims coming forward, he said. "It undermines the whole process. People will point to you and say, 'why should we take genuine victims seriously' when there are cases like yours, when you put a man through severe hardship through some vindictiveness I can't even fathom," Judge Ruth said. ​
/r/MensRights20/02/19 08:11 AM
1

Man bites dog!
/r/MensRights18/02/19 07:53 PM
3

https://www.homeless.org.uk/sites/default/files/site-attachments/Homeless%20Link%20-%20analysis%20of%20rough%20sleeping%20statistics%20for%20England%202017_0.pdf
/r/MensRights18/02/19 06:53 PM
2

Would a man enjoy Julie's special relationship with the police? ​ I have also been a victim of Twitter madness. Last year I received a visit from two local police officers who had come to issue me a warning about an alleged ‘hate crime’ I had committed. Apparently, I had tweeted something about how men with beards, penises, Adam’s apples, who wear traditional male apparel, should not scream at and threaten feminists who refuse to accept them as women. I had been reported by a trans activist, who…
/r/MensRights17/02/19 08:22 PM
10

https://www.purplemotes.net/2014/06/08/men-reluctant-marry/ ​ In ancient Roman, most men were denied the right to vote, had no realistic opportunity to hold public office, and owned little or no property. In addition, men were conscripted into military service. The exploitation of ordinary men, common throughout history, was not just a feature of Roman public life. Roman men also evidently found their family obligations toward women to be oppressive. By about 18 BGC, a large share of Roman men w…
/r/MensRights17/02/19 08:04 PM
4

Scotland closed the female prisons. Not yet. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HM_Prison_Cornton_Vale ​
/r/MensRights17/02/19 07:58 PM
13

"because women didn't have the vote for x years, men today should be punished". Straw man, fair, or bonkers? Bonkers. You can't act to compensate the past, because we can't affect the past. Since we can act only in the present, and if we want to be fair, then we can act fairly only on injustices that exist in the present. Women can vote in the present, so there is nothing to compensate for in the present. So, in this case, nothing need be done.
/r/MensRights17/02/19 03:59 AM
3

What evidence?
/r/MensRights13/02/19 09:31 PM
4

The best solution to false rape accusations Those are where the rape didn't happen. So your condom trap need not apply. ​
/r/MensRights13/02/19 08:52 PM
3

Here's some stats from back in 2009-2010: https://www.safeworkaustralia.gov.au/system/files/documents/1702/australian_work-related_injury_experience_by_sex_and_age_2009-10.pdf
/r/MensRights12/02/19 04:01 AM
3

Identity politics looking for new groups to use. They want something to identify the group, then they want something derogatory and alarmist about the group, and they want the group to be small and really not as powerful as they will be painted. What to use as a group marker? Such a problem! Religion is a favorite. Catholics and Protestants, Jews and Christians, and now Islam, or is it "Islamists". The trouble with Islam is there are a lot of them. Oh dear, better be a bit cautious, and think ou…
/r/MensRights07/02/19 10:43 AM
2

until men rethink their priorities and start to see fatherhood in a different light No surprise. Now will she take the very next step in her thinking, and work out how men could perhaps be persuaded to "rethink their priorities"? In my opinion, there's little hope of that. Probably, the Men In Charge (to whom she addresses her plaint) will institute some sort of state enforced coercion, going by past performance; resulting in everything getting worse, also going by past performance. Still, the w…
/r/MensRights07/02/19 10:05 AM
3

I would do it for my son if it were beneficial. As far as HIV goes, studies have shown a beneficial effect of FGM. See for example http://www.tzonline.org/pdf/femalecircumcisionandHIVinfectionintanzania.pdf which came as a big surprise. Unlike MGM, this lead to intense speculation on why it must be wrong ("irreducible confounding" - see the Conclusions). ​
/r/MensRights06/02/19 06:54 AM
4

don’t they remove the entire clitoris No. That would involve an internal operation.
/r/MensRights06/02/19 06:37 AM
0

This discussion isn’t about changing Japanese culture or economy. The situation in Japan is exactly what the discussion is about. It’s a debate about low birth rates being a shared responsibility of men and women, or the responsibility of women only. No, that's all you are able to take from the discussion. The implied slight to women has terminated your though process at this point. The real question here is: Knowing these factors, what do you believe is the reason woman are solely responsible f…
/r/MensRights05/02/19 03:38 PM
1

I do not understand how the ‘blame’ can be placed solely on women. Agreed. Then how much of the "blame" (I'd prefer "cause", but still) can be placed on women?
/r/MensRights05/02/19 03:26 PM
2

The incels dispersed after their sub was shut down. So your argument appears to be that Japan's deputy PM is an incel?
/r/MensRights05/02/19 03:21 PM
2

OK, those seem to be relevant factors. Now what sort of actions would you recommend to alleviate the problem? ​
/r/MensRights05/02/19 03:14 PM
-1

Blaming women for low birth rates is not a part of this Movement, It is, however, a proximate cause of population decline. and is an argument that holds no legitimate merit. And your argument is ... what, exactly? This isn’t a women’s hate sub, Examining the reason for low birthrates has nothing to do with "hating women", although women are definitely involved. Is it possible for you to examine the problem without indulging your reflex?
/r/MensRights05/02/19 03:07 PM
-4

It is not a part of the men’s rights movement to blame women for low birth rates. Then what should be blamed for low birth rates? Come up with some rational explanation instead of jerking from the knee. ​
/r/MensRights05/02/19 02:55 PM
3

Keep guessing, beefboy.
/r/MensRights05/02/19 02:33 PM
1

But, cause comes before effect.
/r/MensRights05/02/19 01:58 PM
3

MGTOW is a local solution to a risk/benefit problem in your immediate environment. It minimizes your risk for the time being, it's possible to do as an individual, but it's a second-best solution. To solve the real problem, you need to act outside of the immediate environment, that is, MGTOW + more. You need to get into the areas of mass social attitudes, politics, and legal systems. This is immensely difficult, especially for an individual; it's against basic instincts and every hand is against…
/r/MensRights05/02/19 01:47 PM
2

Seems to be repeating the MGTOW philosophy. Stumbling around in the fog of feminism, trying a clumsy attempt at satire, she lucks into a clear spot of truth.
/r/MensRights05/02/19 01:20 PM
1

The Psychology of Men Show Dr. McDerrmott and Dr. Pietrantonio Dr. Peterson they ain't.
/r/MensRights31/01/19 03:38 AM
3

thoughts on mgtow It's a viable risk minimization strategy, valuable in the short term The trouble with that is, it's not enough. The source of the problem has to be identified, and then a strategy evolved to fix it. As for the mgtow subreddit, I agree with a lot of what's said there about how to avoid the hidden pitfalls of modern society. There's a strain, or maybe a stain, running though it that I don't like though. For example, those dire warnings to women about hitting the wall, cats etc. Q…
/r/MensRights30/01/19 11:44 AM
48

A judge ordering evidence to be destroyed? Yes, very disturbing.
/r/MensRights30/01/19 09:50 AM
2

In future, please use r/Toxic_Femininity for posts about "Women Being Bad" unless they include a specific instance of discrimination against men. Another rule narrowing the scope of discussion. There will be uncertainty, and legalistic-style arguments, about the exact meaning of include a specific instance of discrimination against men. For example, a post about a woman getting a lenient sentence for a bad crime: would this be rejected? Would it still be rejected if that same item were to be acc…
/r/MensRights30/01/19 07:41 AM
1

does Toxic Masculinity not exist? (genuine question) It has not been shown to exist, if by "exist" you mean having any sort of useful resemblance to reality. It's a snappy rhetorical term, a word play. It exists in that sense. Is it a term that is useful in discussion? For an answer to that, just look at the OP. That burger business is all about playing around with the definition of the term. It's not about masculinity, it's about burgers; toxic burgers I guess. Or maybe toxic cheese. Or maybe h…
/r/MensRights28/01/19 08:02 PM
2

Manosphere (MN). The "manosphere" is a collection of groups and online sites advocating male supremacy and subjugation of women. Key concepts: Men Going Their Own Way (MGTOW), incel (involuntarily celibate), False Rape Society, pickup artists, anti-feminism, men's rights activists, Milo Yiannopoulos, Roosh V., Mike Cernovich. There we are, along with the other"far right groups", male supremacy and subjugation of women. Who funds these conferences? You can tell you're dealing with moral slime by …
/r/MensRights26/01/19 06:19 PM
14

Seems like a custody dispute. Landeros, who identified by the non-gender-specific pronouns they/their/them, was divorced and shared joint custody of their two daughters with Landeros’ ex-wife. Landeros enrolled one of the daughters in the school several days before the incident without informing the ex-wife, Perlow said. Landeros’ ex-wife learned of this and brought custody paperwork to the school. The school called Timm, the school resource officer, following the district’s practice of calling …
/r/MensRights26/01/19 05:13 AM
1

The guys who did the mathematical work that makes the internet possible? All philosophy students, most of them also taught philosophy. lol
/r/MensRights26/01/19 12:25 AM
2

How do you know it was a false accusation? I don't, but that is the question. It should be flaired something like "possible false accusation" or maybe just "accusation"; but we are limited to what's available.
/r/MensRights25/01/19 02:41 AM
18

Just a confirmation, if any were needed, of the truly antimale stance of the ad. It's to help men to be better, yes? ​ Nah, fucknuts.
/r/MensRights24/01/19 07:15 PM
1

satire fails Yep
/r/MensRights24/01/19 04:23 AM
3

I always thought it was cornflakes. Whatever.
/r/MensRights24/01/19 04:16 AM
6

Why not admit that you want to hit a woman or sleep with an underage girl? It's so obvious. Peak troll! Overload!
/r/MensRights24/01/19 04:15 AM
1

we are much more complex It helps to simplify down to the essentials. I'm pretty sure ants don't have arguments about social justice. Yet they have a society which sacrifices soldiers in favor of the continued existence of the ability to reproduce. Are we, with a below replacement birth rate, doing as well?
/r/MensRights23/01/19 03:00 PM
2

female ants Don't run the analogy too far. The essential dynamic is a force of motile defenders of a static and vulnerable reproductive function.
/r/MensRights23/01/19 02:50 PM
3

Now they're at "full representation", maybe they'll shut up.
/r/MensRights23/01/19 09:15 AM
2

Basically, the ad's entire message is that men need to rise up together in order to protect women, and correct the behavior in each other, as well as in their sons. That wasn't the "entire message". There was the bit about how bad we all are. Well, all except for the Few Good Men. But mostly bad. Presented in a snide, sneering manner too. The only way (according to the ad), that our current society can be fixed is by the hands of strong, powerful, and heroic men. ... provided that those strong, …
/r/MensRights23/01/19 08:48 AM
-14

In ant colonies, a vast Queen sits in the middle, the safest part, surrounded by servant workers lavishing her with every attention (she better keep up with the egg laying though). If there's trouble, a bit of bother with the next colony over, or maybe even another species, she - or something acting for her - sends out her soldiers to take care of business. They are there for the violence, when needed. Some of them will be killed, but it would not be good for the colony as a whole to lose too ma…
/r/MensRights23/01/19 02:50 AM
14

Like a toned-down Big Red. Lol. And what's with the hard-G Gillette? English orthography has a lot to answer for.
/r/MensRights23/01/19 02:24 AM
2

Some links: New women’s shelter opens in Toronto as temperatures plunge https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SkgkbrwxyhU ​ Toronto to open more facilities as shelters struggle with ‘unprecedented demand’ https://globalnews.ca/news/3987735/toronto-shelters-struggle-demand/ ​ 'The hidden homeless': Downtown Toronto gets new women's shelter in wake of 2 deaths https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/ywca-women-shelter-davenport-1.4985108 ​
/r/MensRights23/01/19 12:55 AM
8

Does this sub actually care about the issues of men Yes is it a woman hating sub? No
/r/MensRights22/01/19 03:54 AM
1

So Gillette made a video. So, will you be buying any Gillette products?
/r/MensRights21/01/19 10:00 PM
84

For the UK, see http://www.hse.gov.uk/statistics/pdf/fatalinjuries.pdf On page 7, it says Injuries by gender and age Fatal injuries to workers are predominately to male workers. In 2017/18, 138 (96%) of all worker fatalities were to male workers, a similar proportion to earlier years. For the US, try https://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/cfoi.pdf Table 1, page 5, where the gender death numbers are 387 female / 4803 male for 2016; and 386/4761 for 2017.
/r/MensRights21/01/19 05:55 AM
4

Then they got feminism.
/r/MensRights20/01/19 05:52 AM
1

If you adopt a group label, then others will make assumptions about your opinions based on that.
/r/MensRights20/01/19 02:03 AM
3

My guess: she wants to maintain her own autonomy, form her own opinions, and not let others speak for her. Remember, she altered her opinion of feminism once she found out the facts. ​
/r/MensRights19/01/19 07:36 PM
3

instead of just laughing at such a blatant attempt at pandering and dismissing it We've done that. Again and again, over the years. And again. And it keeps going on, it never stops, it gets worse and worse, and, finally, it dawns on the general consciousness that it won't ever stop unless it is stopped.
/r/MensRights19/01/19 01:08 AM
10

LOL Proof that it's not any sort of a discussion forum, it's more a permanent propaganda platform. Basically, a waste of time to read.
/r/MensRights19/01/19 01:00 AM
1

We could take a page from the feminist playbook and harp on about it endlessly for years, bring it up on every relevant occasion, and try to get phrases like The Gillette Ad and Doing a Gillette established in the language as bywords for stupidity. Not joking here. Of course, we need to stop short before going too far, something which they didn't. Needs judgement.
/r/MensRights19/01/19 12:56 AM
2

she said repeatedly that she was not an MRA, She's always said that. So I'm not really certain what her advocacy is for I don't think it's "advocacy", it more like simple observation. Another thing she says repeatedly is that she adopts a "fly on the wall" approach in her documentaries. clearly this is not what she would be doing given a choice. I guess that, given the choice, she would prefer universal approval and everyone buy her documentaries. Who wouldn't. She has had to settle for notoriet…
/r/MensRights19/01/19 12:46 AM
7

Something seriously wrong with this woman. What could Gillette's reasoning be to select her to make their ad?
/r/MensRights19/01/19 12:36 AM
1

They've gone too far, the ground has vanished under their feet, they are plummeting into the void and they are flailing around trying to reestablish the old certainties. Overdone hysteria is the result. Unconvincing, and sort of pathetic. I feel sorry for them. Really, really sorry. I must go and find a tissue or handkerchief or something before the tears mess up my keyboard.
/r/MensRights18/01/19 10:09 AM
7

http://www.mvpstrat.com Seems to be a significant organization. I wonder how they get their money.
/r/MensRights14/01/19 10:05 PM
5

Metropolitan Police pay me £10,000 in general damages. ... with regards to the very serious misconduct of Detective Inspector Julian King and Detective Constable Phil Dial Good. It's progress. But it succeeded because Alexander Economou has got significant financial resources. The ordinary guy just can't afford justice. Maybe something from this case will affect general perceptions? - or maybe not, this didn't make the news at all, at least this is the first time I've heard about it. ​ ​
/r/MensRights14/01/19 09:47 PM
2

Rule 1: Women's signatures are no use in making contracts. (This was how it used to be: maybe we see how it got that way). Rule 2: Social/sexual interactions be governed by voluntary agreements akin to what is used by trade associations. Rule 3: Chaperones. I think this one is a joke. Maybe.
/r/MensRights13/01/19 04:26 AM
2

Better to decrease men's pension age than to increase women's.
/r/MensRights13/01/19 01:59 AM
3

I didn't believe it until there were multiple accusations. Now I'm convinced.
/r/MensRights13/01/19 01:54 AM
3

What a repellent woman. She would be well advised not to smile so much. "Big Think", eh. More like Big Stink.
/r/MensRights12/01/19 10:17 PM
4

I’m gone. Have a nice life!
/r/MensRights11/01/19 08:19 PM
19

Is this a Men's Rights subreddit or conservative subreddit? It's a Men's Rights subreddit.
/r/MensRights11/01/19 07:58 PM
148

Parasites on parade.
/r/MensRights11/01/19 07:26 PM
3

There's still a lot of differing posts in that thread. Which ones do you think the OP would see as "terrible"? Or would the OP, in your opinion, like to remove the entire thread? Would you like to see the entire thread removed?
/r/MensRights10/01/19 10:23 PM
3

That's a whole bunch of different arguments, many different attitudes. Sharply different, some of them.
/r/MensRights10/01/19 10:02 PM
1

he literally gave an example of the terrible attitude. What was that?
/r/MensRights10/01/19 09:47 PM
18

The OP is simply concern trolling. Evident from the first paragraph: we cannot help men around the world if we continue to have a terrible attitude. What's a "terrible attitude"? Well, we can't discuss that without displaying the said terrible attitude, so we'll just have to accept the OP's definition. In other words, it's a lead-in to the suppression of any discussion not to the OP's taste. refuse to acknowledge when women are right, refuse to acknowledge when they face an issue, Whether they a…
/r/MensRights10/01/19 05:56 AM
2

Good, sound advice. Take notes.
/r/MensRights09/01/19 11:14 PM
2

https://www.rt.com/usa/ Heh. You and an entire news organization. RT don't have the mission to make US society look good. They don't pick these items at random. O wad some Pow'r the giftie gie us To see oursels as ithers see us! - "To a louse"
/r/MensRights09/01/19 10:59 PM
1

What do you think of this thread? It would be rude to intrude.
/r/MensRights09/01/19 10:46 PM
8

So today in school we had to watch “The Hunting Ground” by CNN Ask for a showing of The Red Pill. For the sake of diversity of viewpoints.
/r/MensRights09/01/19 02:48 AM
4

What's the difference between the feminism and feminisms subs?
/r/MensRights07/01/19 03:48 AM
6

Reprimanded for unprofessional conduct. Just focusing on this point only, there may be an alternative explanation. http://vitalsigns.bangordailynews.com/2017/03/01/home/disgusted-by-soaring-prices-maine-doctor-devises-an-alternative-to-the-epipen/ Dr. Cathleen London runs a family practice in Washington County, where nearly 20 percent of residents lack health insurance, the highest uninsured rate in the state. So when the price for a life-saving allergy medication skyrocketed last summer, she kn…
/r/MensRights06/01/19 07:44 PM
2

Am I in the wrong here? You made a valid comment, in the universe of rational discussion; that is, discussion aimed at getting closer to the truth. But that's not the universe that their subreddit exists in. As far as I can see, it's all propaganda, rhetorical points, and misdirection away from their central message. Anything not meeting those standards is easily suppressed, just ban it. Why not take the easy route? The trouble will come when those feminists engage outside of their little univer…
/r/MensRights05/01/19 11:17 AM
10

The numbers must play a part: There are four women, three unaccompanied minors, two young children and a baby amongst the 32 rescued migrants onboard the Sea-Watch 3, along with 22 crew members. http://www.independent.com.mt/articles/2019-01-05/local-news/Di-Maio-s-offer-cannot-be-taken-seriously-Sea-Watch-spokesperson-6736201616 ​
/r/MensRights05/01/19 10:17 AM
1

Correlation =/= Causation. You need to prove that misandry is causing worse outcomes for men. You need to use a more appropriate symbol rather than =/=. One that means "might imply, but then again might not".
/r/MensRights05/01/19 05:59 AM
2

Too often I see people here cite things like workplace death rates, homelessness rates, incarceration rates, and average lifespan as evidence for discrimination against men. Discrimination is only one explanation; other causes can be put forward and argued about. But what is unarguable is that these are all examples of male disadvantage. And what's more, a generally unacknowledged disadvantage, which is why we need to keep talking about them. I realize that you are only copying what the feminist…
/r/MensRights05/01/19 05:56 AM
2

So that's what they mean by "microaggression". Insults ... aggressive, ok. Deliberately linking the recipient to a negative stereotype ... aggressive, ok. But unthinkingly linking to a negative stereotype? That's not aggressive, that's ignorant. She gave the example of her unthinkingly using "going Dutch" to a Dutch colleague , who then told her he was offended. This is not any sort of "aggression", unless she knew both that he was Dutch, and also that he would see it as a slur. Whether or not i…
/r/MensRights02/01/19 09:43 PM
-1

notice a pattern here: Anti male, anti male, anti male and then anti male. Yes, that would seem to cover it.
/r/MensRights01/01/19 02:29 AM
2

Peterson's main premise -- that men need to "take responsibility" -- seems almost redundant. I mean, society as a whole tells men to do that always, i dont understand why people think that when Peterson says that, its brand new information. It's an indirect way of telling men to develop their powers (but responsibly). Because you can't be properly held responsible for something you don't have any power to affect.
/r/MensRights31/12/18 05:05 PM
25

Helen Lewis. This woman is up herself. Along with the video of the interview, posted on YouTube on October 30, Lewis published a summary of her experience interviewing the famously anti-PC intellectual. ...in which she writes: But Peterson is a heretic. He believes that there is no such thing as the patriarchy. But, at the same time, he’s not some standard issue boorish Alpha Male. (He cries more than I do, and dresses better, too.) Nor is he a lazy, unthinking bar-room sexist. (He doesn’t use c…
/r/MensRights30/12/18 09:17 PM
1

fatal violence is much more a part of the male nature than female That may be true. But focusing on that doesn't do anything about the problem, because, as you have pointed out yourself, men spend much less time with children. Therefore, if you really wanted to do something effective to reduce child deaths, you need to look at the mothers. Pointing at fathers, or men in general, is just a distraction.
/r/MensRights26/12/18 02:35 AM
1

0:57 "men shouldn't be left out, but ..." But they are left out. And chased by the cops too, as the caller said. Thus highlighting the underlying viciousness of our shithole society, which can well afford to help but uses "women and children" as an excuse not to.
/r/MensRights25/12/18 06:54 PM
27

Why have such barbaric practices not been banned yet? They have been banned - for females. The answer therefore is sexism against males.
/r/MensRights25/12/18 06:11 PM
1

She's demonstrating what happens when someone from a different tradition immigrates to another society. They lose their original social conventions and adopt those of the host society within a couple of generations as they become exposed to the conventions and economic conditions of the host.
/r/MensRights25/12/18 06:06 PM
1

As for reputation I'm concerned about MRAs maintaining our reputation for being oversensitive, self-centred yet not self-aware, tolerant of misogynists, with little sense of humour and an unhealthy obsession with the (((global feminist conspiracy))). Yes, this is the attitude that lies behind your posts and keeps coming through to a greater or lesser extent. What reception do you think it merits? It's bizarre.
/r/MensRights25/12/18 05:33 PM
1

don't understand how they work Nor me. That bot is certainly convincing to start with, but just seems a little off in a protracted conversation. It's just a "feeling", much derided as evidence in STEM company, but one I keep getting.
/r/MensRights24/12/18 11:46 PM
3

It makes yet another place where you can't get away from them.
/r/MensRights24/12/18 11:10 PM
14

It is revealing how men here who seem really excited by reciting facts which appears to show women in a poor light, suddenly lose interest in relevant facts when those fail to support the "women are evil" story. You seem to be much more worried about the reputation of women than you are about the welfare of children.
/r/MensRights24/12/18 06:41 AM
7

Not instantly enough.
/r/MensRights23/12/18 11:58 PM
18

We ought to care. It's propaganda, right there in public, hiding among other useful stuff.
/r/MensRights23/12/18 11:51 PM
1

Yep
/r/MensRights23/12/18 11:31 PM
1

She must be really, REALLY high on some kind of mind altering drug to believe any of this garbage. She's a somatechnics researcher. So there. https://lgbt.arizona.edu/somatechnics-researcher/whitney-stark
/r/MensRights23/12/18 11:23 PM
4

in no way representative of feminism at large. It is however written by a somatechnics researcher at the University of Arizona. A platform higher than most. https://lgbt.arizona.edu/somatechnics-researcher/whitney-stark ​ ​
/r/MensRights23/12/18 11:17 PM
0

Is this The Onion It's the minnestoa review, a journal of "creative writing", ie crap.
/r/MensRights23/12/18 11:08 PM
1

this female physicist She's not a physicist. https://lgbt.arizona.edu/somatechnics-researcher/whitney-stark ​
/r/MensRights23/12/18 11:03 PM
1

the actual scientific point of the article There is none. It's an exercise in "creative writing". The minnesota review bills itself as a journal of creative and critical writing. That sort of academic journal.
/r/MensRights23/12/18 10:44 PM
2

It's a piece of "creative writing". Look at the masthead of the journal in which it appears.
/r/MensRights23/12/18 10:29 PM
2

Academic Journal: Newtonian Physics Is ‘Oppressive’ to Marginalized People The minnesota review bills itself as a journal of creative and critical writing. That sort of academic journal. ​ About the Journal Publishing contemporary poetry and fiction as well as reviews, critical commentary, and interviews of leading intellectual figures, the minnesota review curates smart, accessible collections of progressive new work. This eclectic survey provides lively and sophisticated signposts to navigatin…
/r/MensRights23/12/18 05:54 PM
19

Yes, looks like it. Daddy I Do and The Right To Love play OK, but not The Red Pill. I hope this is just a glitch and not the start of another attempt at suppression.
/r/MensRights22/12/18 01:27 AM
11

Notice, it's a quote. Read it through to the end. But I've edited it, thanks.
/r/MensRights22/12/18 12:16 AM
1

It's a bot.
/r/MensRights21/12/18 11:53 PM
2

Hello LEMAISONVERT Why did you hide your post to this thread? https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/a83hlz/retail_outlet_target_fixes_pink_tax_in_other_news/ ​
/r/MensRights21/12/18 11:41 PM
3

In stead of the picture, look any where else.
/r/MensRights21/12/18 07:36 PM
3

Within every pair of categories of race/FSM, boys come lower than girls.
/r/MensRights21/12/18 11:43 AM
2

Interesting question, eh? Can't say exactly, why. Take a look at this thread from a few days ago, and tell me what you think. https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/a4hn9f/women_are_considered_superior/ebf4qfg/ ​
/r/MensRights21/12/18 08:43 AM
1

3 comments at time of writing, but I see only 2. One has been hidden. I do believe it's a post from a bot. LEMAISONVERT-2 points · 7 hours ago funny thing about cyprus. white cars cost more. funny thing about amazon - different colors of the same shit costs different. this has to do with economics. not the AP microecon I took in highschool. The shit they taught us in 7th grade. supply and demand vaguely determine price. when inventory needs to be cleared it gets discounted. when people don't wan…
/r/MensRights21/12/18 07:57 AM
1

I do believe you are conversing with a bot.
/r/MensRights21/12/18 06:39 AM
7

I think it's a bot. Here's a previous thread: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/a4hn9f/women_are_considered_superior/ebf4qfg Starts off like any typical bigot infestation, then gets more and more bottish. Opinions?
/r/MensRights21/12/18 06:20 AM
11

A more recent news report: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3690363/Former-millionaire-brands-UK-laws-unfair-men-divorce-judges-gave-money-ex-wife-threatened-jail-didn-t-pay-maintenance.html Mrs Morris, 52, was awarded £500,000 in the settlement while he received £66,000. He was later ordered to pay her £77,000 in maintenance and other 'debts' and was last year given a six-week suspended prison term for failing to pay her £2,000 per month. ​ ... Following those arguments, Damien Garrido …
/r/MensRights21/12/18 04:43 AM
4

Also, you are up for the costs of the application, right at the time when funds are low.
/r/MensRights21/12/18 02:17 AM
2

I believe they can apply for an increase due to changed circumstances, yes.
/r/MensRights21/12/18 01:22 AM
3

http://archive.is/l5Qet
/r/MensRights19/12/18 03:30 AM
3

People trust the medias to report the truth objectively Even if we don't trust them, they are everywhere. These days, most informational things come to us (are fed to us) via a screen. There's a considerable infrastructure behind those screens. It's not so much the outright lies they tell us - often detectable - but what they don't tell us, that does the damage.
/r/MensRights19/12/18 01:06 AM
1

I did. So you know it contained useful information about gender differences in a form difficult to deny. Yet you suppressed it. That is to say, denied others the opportunity to read it. Fascinating. Why didn't you properly title it? It's a crosspost from r/europe, as I'm sure you noticed. It has the title they gave it over there. Don't you have a thing about editorializing?
/r/MensRights18/12/18 05:09 PM
1

Your post is about race/ethnicity. Why don't you read it, "mensmod".
/r/MensRights18/12/18 02:59 PM
2

You are saying that the personal costs of a pregnancy outweigh the personal costs of signing a document. The thing you are trying to slip by unexamined is that then justifies foregoing the choice about 20 years of child support. I agree that the costs of the pregnancy are unaccounted for. But you can account for it by limiting the man's liability to 9 months support of the woman, which will be much much less than decades of "child" support.
/r/MensRights18/12/18 02:53 AM
3

But once the child actually exists Then restrict the man's right to choose to the period of time when the child doesn't exist. Like you claim for the woman.
/r/MensRights18/12/18 01:01 AM
9

You forgot the second part. Sorry about that. Seems like you agree with me. If you're equating 9 months of pregnancy with two decades of child support, then I do not agree with you.
/r/MensRights18/12/18 12:13 AM
13

This is not an equivalent comparison You have omitted the factor of paying for any child until adulthood.
/r/MensRights17/12/18 11:29 PM
3

because there is no child to have rights to yet, it's purely a matter of the mother's body. Yes. It's her choice whether or not to abort. If the man repudiates any financial responsibility before there is a child, then it's still her choice whether or not to abort. Your argument makes no sense. What does change are the factors the woman needs to take into account in making her decision. Still her body, her choice though.
/r/MensRights17/12/18 11:19 PM
1

It has to do with the state having an interest in providing for citizens, and then passing that cost to those responsible Sounds rational. Then to enforce that passing on of the cost, the state will do things like take away licenses used to make the income that pays the cost; impute incomes to unrealistically high levels; impose fines and penalties owed to itself, then charge interest on any unpaid amount , accrued to itself, not to any child. If that's rational, it's not any rationality we woul…
/r/MensRights17/12/18 11:01 PM
2

double-standards arise naturally because the sexes are so different. Yes If we pick and choose, we unbalance society. Yes. But society is already unbalanced because technology has altered the environment. What the OP proposes is an attempt to rebalance society.
/r/MensRights17/12/18 10:44 PM
2

I wonder when they will start blurring out animal phalluses. They're already censoring the breasts of other species. If a mermaid counts as another species. http://www.uniontimes.org/tag/facebook-removes-image-of-copenhagens-little-mermaid-statue-because-of-nudity/ ​
/r/MensRights17/12/18 08:33 PM
2

https://snew.notabug.io/r/legaladvice/comments/a6ux87/called_a_rapist_at_a_compay_party/
/r/MensRights17/12/18 07:52 PM
3

Yep.
/r/MensRights17/12/18 07:50 PM
3

they must of been real toxic They looked like good advice to me. Some were suspicious of the wife and the boss, same point as omegaphallic made. ​ To see the deleted comments, replace "www.reddit.com" in the url by "snew.notabug.io" ​
/r/MensRights17/12/18 07:42 PM
15

Realism? 'Battlefield' Has Never Been Historically Accurate, That's Why It's Fun Nothing says “realistic respect and honor” like rocket-jumping a boat over a building and bazooka-ing a jet in midair https://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/article/3k4kkw/battlefield-v-historical-accuracy ​
/r/MensRights17/12/18 03:15 AM
7

Near the start of the video,opera singer Lesley Garrett says there isn't a difference in the sound of prepubescent boy's and girl's voices. And at the end, she says that even if girl's voices do sound different to boy's - "which they don't" - even then, why shouldn't we have a different sound? Err... What's her real reasoning? We hear it at around 2:40 where she says "King's College chapel choir is a very very famous choir. It's an international brand". Well, there are mixed choirs, boy's choirs…
/r/MensRights16/12/18 03:05 AM
1

When you’re a dv victim okay but nobody takes you seriously because you are male Yes, that's common. Men will not admit to being abused because of the social shaming that comes with it. Some, the more depraved and despicable of society, will even try to make fun of it. and you have nowhere to go bc there are only women’s dv shelters and no men’s dv shelters so you are forced to either kill yourself or be killed by your abusive partner
/r/MensRights15/12/18 08:55 PM
7

"In reality, perpetrators tend to be none of these things and they attempt to control others in the only place where they have the full confidence to do so - in the family home – and in the only way that they can rely on through superior physical strength.” So, in reality, the guy you think has got his act together, the one who outwardly seems just fine, who would never hit a woman actually can – and do. It can be the bloke we may have socialised with, shared a meal or even a bed. No one knows w…
/r/MensRights15/12/18 08:45 PM
342

Reached by PJ Media, Professor Starr (who teaches at the University of Michigan) suggested her article may not have been censored, but rather, that USC stopped paying for access to the particular article. That poor, cash strapped University of Southern California. It's coming up to Christmas too. Isn't there a Tiny Tim Cratchit fund, or something, that could help them out?
/r/MensRights15/12/18 08:27 PM
6

Adaku Onyeka-Crawford for one. She's very concerned. “It is concerning that they're not dismissing these complaints outright,” said Adaku Onyeka-Crawford, senior counsel for education at the National Women’s Law Center, a Washington-based nonprofit that advocates for women’s rights. “The Department of Education regulations specifically allow affirmative action programs.” “not all women have seen the gains from affirmative action,” said Onyeka-Crawford, of the National Women’s Law Center, who not…
/r/MensRights15/12/18 12:47 AM
3

use statistical analysis That works best with plenty of data. You probably wouldn't have enough cases to get a significant result. Then, you really want a random sampling, and you won't have that either. Ideally, the investigator (you) should approach the study with no preconceptions, no bias... that's never a problem for feminist studies, but it would be for you. ​ So, instead of a statistical analysis, I'd recommend case-by-case comparisons. Try to find the same piece of work from a male and f…
/r/MensRights15/12/18 12:19 AM
7

They're busy fixing that.
/r/MensRights15/12/18 12:04 AM
10

Yes, the death of Grace Millane is truly shocking. We have a young woman, in the year of the MeToo movement, being killed. But why the outpouring of grief for her and not for Rima Sikei, a 21-year-old who died in Mt Albert on Friday night. Where was the Prime Minister's sympathy for him? Or for Frank Tyson, whose decapitated body had been found in Lower Hutt the same weekend that Grace went missing? I wonder what the difference could possibly be.
/r/MensRights14/12/18 11:57 PM
2

Why do they think sex is so special? Because it's a crime, unless they agree to it (special conditions may apply).
/r/MensRights14/12/18 09:29 PM
4

My friends No friends of yours, really.
/r/MensRights14/12/18 09:22 PM
16

1. I can’t yell at the baby. Neither can he, for the same reasons. 2. I can’t yell at my boss/coworkers. Neither can he. He's got a wife and child to support. 3. I haven’t eaten all day. Oh, ok this one is not bilateral. - " I announce I’m hungry, he has a 15-minute window (sometimes less) to feed me before I become whiny, grumpy and intolerable to be around." 4. I haven’t slept in days. Make that months. Neither has he, from her own account. 5. I didn’t go for a run. If he were able to, I'm sur…
/r/MensRights14/12/18 07:26 PM
4

Concern...
/r/MensRights14/12/18 07:04 PM
44

Critics say that Pekgoz profoundly misunderstands Title IX. He does if he thinks it's anything to do with "equality". ​
/r/MensRights14/12/18 06:14 PM
1

Thanks, WhyNotCollegeBoard, but my question was directed to LEMAISONVERT .
/r/MensRights14/12/18 11:00 AM
2

Are you a bot? ​
/r/MensRights14/12/18 10:36 AM
2

you are as alone on reddit as you are in life Wind blows the dust along a deserted street. Discarded trash. No-one's been this way for four days at least ... the occasional dog turd ... oh and LEMAISONVERT ...
/r/MensRights14/12/18 05:40 AM
6

Is there anything I can do to make the school stop having these girls only events? Rather than complain about the girl-only events, ask for some events that would also include males.
/r/MensRights14/12/18 03:08 AM
11

Just remember, as the good judge reminds us, when a woman makes up a false rape claim, the true victim is not the man whose life is destroyed. It's other women! ​
/r/MensRights14/12/18 02:49 AM
7

In a feminist society, these women wouldn't receive any prison time. We'll see what happens in our society. Luckily, one of them is a man, and I'm sure he'll Man Up and serve their sentences for them. The judge will insist.
/r/MensRights14/12/18 02:26 AM
1

Here's another article on the same event, from a different source, the local newspaper: https://www.gloucestershirelive.co.uk/news/cheltenham-news/weak-mum-who-sexual-activity-2314512 If you're going to put in the effort to do internet searches on the event, try something relevant instead of searching for alien skulls.
/r/MensRights13/12/18 08:07 PM
1

she may be bad Indeed, she may. he is abusive Could be. It's impossible to take a side in this scenario So why bother to post?
/r/MensRights13/12/18 07:42 PM
1

You don't know why he has zero custody. For all you know he is abusive. Don't be so naive. You don't know why he has zero custody. For all you know she is manipulative. Don't be so naive. ​
/r/MensRights13/12/18 07:13 PM
6

Maybe or maybe not.
/r/MensRights13/12/18 07:10 PM
3

https://www.gloucestershirelive.co.uk/news/cheltenham-news/weak-mum-who-sexual-activity-2314512
/r/MensRights13/12/18 03:53 AM
3

So how would you, in the judge's place, help him? Jail?
/r/MensRights13/12/18 03:36 AM
1

What "aforementioned articles", The ones in the publications that I listed. and expect me to go find I've given the names of the publications. The search terms are obvious from the initial article. It's not much of an ask. If you claim something is real, I don't have to take your word for it. Quite right, for example "The Earth is flat". Try searching for photos taken from the ISS. You could do this from Google image search. anyone could rightfully call me a sheep If you say so.
/r/MensRights12/12/18 10:07 PM
0

The evidence is in the aforementioned articles. If you are going to assert that this evidence is false, prove it.
/r/MensRights12/12/18 09:33 PM
1

What would you estimate is the proportion of false articles in the tabloids?
/r/MensRights12/12/18 09:31 PM
4

Got any of them links? It's reported in the Sun, the Mirror, the Daily Mail, the Metro, the Daily Star. You can find the links with an internet search.
/r/MensRights12/12/18 08:15 PM
2

Thank you You're welcome.
/r/MensRights10/12/18 03:06 AM
1

You obviously find the topic disturbing. I recommend a nice lie down in a darkened room for a while, until you feel better. ​
/r/MensRights10/12/18 01:04 AM
2

That's why I'm on reddit - it's the only way I can take a little shit on you. ... And I am listening to Italian opera right now whilst sitting on the shitter at the Doubletree in Paris. You must be one of those shitlords we hear about sometimes.
/r/MensRights10/12/18 12:42 AM
1

... sooo, your first time and you rush here to let us all know about it! Wrote so much too, your first time and all. Obsessive.
/r/MensRights09/12/18 05:05 PM
7

it's determined by the people with whom I choose to spend time, the restaurants I choose to frequent, and the place I selected for work I see, an entirely higher plane of existence. Although I do wonder how you know that crackheads smell of piss. actually, don't try going outside. we're not fond of your bo + unbrushed teeth smell combo. Olfactory issues again. Try a dash of perfume - only the most expensive, mind you - on the hundred-dollar bills in your wallet. Everyone will know your worth whe…
/r/MensRights09/12/18 10:22 AM
2

It has nothing to do with feminist but just trying to get people to have more sex because of the low birth rate and high divorce rate. Of course, more sex will not lead to a higher birth rate, because of the availability of birth control, the economic disadvantages of bringing up children, and the lack of enough material benefit to the family. It happens in all rich countries, not just Denmark. In Denmark we have a low birth rate and a high divorce rate, this has nothing to do with feminist at a…
/r/MensRights09/12/18 09:49 AM
10

in my 40 years of life, I've heard this type of "women are superior" talk once, and the feminist "women get paid less" type talk once. And yet the OP was able to present articles in major publications saying just that. Maybe you just don't read them. ​
/r/MensRights09/12/18 09:34 AM
3

So, just a quick reminder to everyone on this subreddit to not be incels. Can't stop talking about it, eh? I wonder what possibly could account for your peculiar obsession. ​
/r/MensRights09/12/18 09:29 AM
3

Your question was Also who is telling feminists what to wear? in response to Feminists want to be taken seriously at work. But telling them what to wear is sexist? As if men haven't been wearing uniforms since the beginning of civilization. That question is relevant only to the to the middle sentence: But telling them what to wear is sexist? The discussion about uniforms is a second, separate thread and I agree with your point there anyway. ​
/r/MensRights09/12/18 07:48 AM
6

Where does it say what feminists have to wear? It doesn't. It's irrelevant. Why is it bad to complain about being cold? "Just put warmer clothes on". Because you're cold. Is that the thrust of the article? No, it's yet another complaint about how bad the ladies have it (so give them some compensation, it's only fair). They could instead wear formal suits styled for women; such things exist. And are you just ignoring the point about women wearing uniforms? Yes, because the point is irrelevant. I …
/r/MensRights08/12/18 07:49 PM
6

I get it, you're incels. LOL ​
/r/MensRights08/12/18 07:29 PM
9

Also who is telling feminists what to wear? What do they have to wear? I'm really curious about what I should be wearing. See for example https://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/2016/03/15/women-shiver-at-work-in-sexist-air-conditioning/ where you will discover it's not a case of "telling you what to wear" (how oppressive) but yet another way women have found to complain about their lot. "First World Problems" indeed.
/r/MensRights08/12/18 06:57 PM
1

You have to change the oil regularly though.
/r/MensRights07/12/18 09:38 AM
2

You know that know what I mean I don't know what that means, nor the rest of what you wrote, sorry. A general sense of malaise and intoxication maybe. twisting words Looking at the rest of your garble, possibly a joke?
/r/MensRights05/12/18 08:30 PM
5

Good grief. A plea agreement that freed two convicted child abusers after serving one year of a 20-year prison sentence was in the best interest of the victims, I want to say "unbelievable", but unfortunately it went as predicted by most people here.
/r/MensRights05/12/18 01:16 PM
5

you here to prove they are normal Beating a five-year-old with a hammer is normal?
/r/MensRights05/12/18 05:35 AM
12

It's a factual reminder that women need not all be wonderful. The women-are-wonderful effect is often cited as an unbalancing bias in discussions over men's rights versus women's rights. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Women_are_wonderful_effect The women-are-wonderful effect is the phenomenon found in psychological and sociological research which suggests that people associate more positive attributes with women compared to men. This bias reflects an emotional bias toward women as a general case.…
/r/MensRights05/12/18 05:34 AM
2

They got 20 years https://www.muskogeephoenix.com/news/two-women-receive-years-in-prison-for-beating-child-with/article_7eb7be90-9a51-11e7-b466-37d7f4b7d36a.html ​
/r/MensRights05/12/18 05:25 AM
-1

https://www.muskogeephoenix.com/news/two-women-receive-years-in-prison-for-beating-child-with/article_7eb7be90-9a51-11e7-b466-37d7f4b7d36a.html
/r/MensRights05/12/18 05:19 AM
5

Kayla Jones, 26, and Rachel Stevens, 29, were both sentenced to 20 years with a one-year judicial review, according to online court records. https://www.muskogeephoenix.com/news/two-women-receive-years-in-prison-for-beating-child-with/article_7eb7be90-9a51-11e7-b466-37d7f4b7d36a.html ​
/r/MensRights05/12/18 05:18 AM
2

The court heard the woman will be committed to the long term care of the Mental Health Review Tribunal in a specialist unit at the Mulawa Correctional Centre, Silverwater, in Sydney’s west. “The tribunal must not release the accused into the community unless and until it’s satisfied the accused will not endanger (anyone else) or herself,” Justice Button said. That proviso isn't worth anything, considering she was earlier "released into the community" after making death threats against the childr…
/r/MensRights03/12/18 09:53 PM
6

Controversial strategies risk isolating women in finance A risk to women? Now that's serious. The MeToo ladies didn't see it coming. But they don't need to bother with tiresome stuff like consequences, some man will jump in to make it all better. An idea from one man in the business: Try not to be a jerk That's his advice to men, not women. Like it will work.
/r/MensRights03/12/18 09:27 PM
13

the label "incel" has caught on Seems to me that it's been pushed fairly vigorously. Do we need even more terms of abuse? Seems like it. It's not the same as "virgin", which could be by choice, or even adds a cachet when applied to young women. "Celibate" also could be by choice. It's the "involuntary" part that carries the venom, and the whole thing boils down to "ha, ha, you can't get laid". Just the tiresome usual.
/r/MensRights03/12/18 05:42 AM
1

Link?
/r/MensRights03/12/18 05:30 AM
2

An on-target comparison would be if the "responses here" were laughing at, or expressing satisfaction with, women being raped. I never see that. Being off-target makes the "satire" seem overdone. For example How about a little “Todd Akin logic?” ( “legitimate rape,” women’s bodies somehow blocked an unwanted pregnancy). No-one here supported that. In fact, he was up for widespread derision from just about everyone everywhere. The woman "satirizing" him is off-target.
/r/MensRights03/12/18 05:02 AM
7

A sort of inherited guilt? I wonder how that works exactly. For example, does a newborn baby boy carry the entire per-man guilt, or does he grow into it slowly? Because if you're going to extract revenge, it would be much easier to do it to a baby who is defenseless.
/r/MensRights03/12/18 12:53 AM
1

What, do they imprison women these days? Barbaric.
/r/MensRights03/12/18 12:48 AM
1

It's an attempt at satire.
/r/MensRights03/12/18 12:45 AM
5

Some of those responses The overall tone is glee at a man being defrauded. You don't see that about women here.
/r/MensRights03/12/18 12:36 AM
0

Yep. Noticeable by the unusually rapid growth of upvotes from the start.
/r/MensRights02/12/18 11:17 PM
7

But Kristin Mapel Bloomberg, a professor of women's studies at Hamline University, says efforts such as Perry's abuse Title IX. I though it was all about equality and stuff. Also "abuse". Oh well, professor of women's studies and all. "This is part of a longer-term backlash against gains women have made in education and the professions," she said. Women still lag behind men in many STEM fields, in compensation and in leadership posts in both the corporate world and academia, Bloomberg said; Down…
/r/MensRights02/12/18 11:09 PM
1

"I am not your sexual object" The idea that you could be never entered my head until you brought it up, sweetie. It's almost as if you were advertising your pulchritudinous attributes in public ... but the written message contradicts your act of drawing attention to yourself. It's all so confusing, I never will understand women, bless their little cotton tits I meant to say socks, they've got me really confused now ... second public parade in a row you say? There may be more upcoming ... oh dear…
/r/MensRights02/12/18 10:24 PM
41

the woman wired herself $2,000 from the guy’s account via Venmo. I'm not up with the latest apps. Doesn't this "Venmo" thing have a record of where it sends your money? If not, it's a good reason not to use it.
/r/MensRights02/12/18 09:48 PM
5

men are equally as capable of making short-sighted stupid decisions Yes, they are. What I'm suggesting is that women tend to make one sort of "short-sighted stupid decisions" and men, another. You evidently cannot even contemplate such a possibility, so any truth in it - or otherwise - is forever hidden from you. If this sub wants to truly promote Men's Rights ...oh... then it should above denigrating women and implying they're inferior. So, are women inferior to men in any respect at all? You a…
/r/MensRights01/12/18 08:49 PM
2

It would seem on the face of it that video evidence is objective and a solid counter to things people just say. It would seem on the face of it that it would tend to inhibit liars and their lying. Yet here you are finding one argument after another against it. You have a motivation you are trying to hide.
/r/MensRights01/12/18 05:23 PM
12

This is a horribly sexist comment. ... but there may be something in it. Is there a general difference in approach in male versus female thinking? From time to time, but consistently, over the years, I've been astonished at how sometimes women whom I know well and know aren't stupid, will simply miss something glaringly obvious. It's like they don't look in the right place. It seems to be connected to position and consequence. Anyway, kneejerking about sexism will shut down examination of such v…
/r/MensRights01/12/18 04:51 PM
164

these worrying videos function as an insurance policy if someone is accused of assault or rape afterwards. Why worrying? That's the third time she's used the word. She's worried that the man might have an insurance policy if he's accused afterwards? (Yes). Well, she needn't worry, because barrister Kate Fortescue says: "Evidence of pre-recorded consent is clearly relevant and something a jury could consider. However, even if consent was freely given, such recordings could never provide a blanket…
/r/MensRights01/12/18 07:37 AM
3

Main Stream Media, I think.
/r/MensRights01/12/18 06:50 AM
3

Seems to be an argument about reducing benefits. We don't want "them" to be too comfortable, it makes the numbers look bad.
/r/MensRights01/12/18 04:09 AM
12

Dominant takes money from the submissive ... submissive buys the Dominant gifts ... the Dominant has direct access to a bank account ... the submissive being completely dominated and humiliated and used by the Dominant in all financial manners ... completely legal contracts ... lawyers ... contracts ... Sounds like marriage.
/r/MensRights30/11/18 10:30 PM
8

Mods of r/IAmATotalPieceOfShit deem apropriate to flair a post with "Men cannot be opressed" Well, they are all total pieces of shit, I presume.
/r/MensRights30/11/18 08:28 PM
14

How to combat r/againstmensrights Just ignore it.
/r/MensRights30/11/18 07:58 PM
2

gender equality is too ill defined to be useful. Its main use is rhetorical ("sounds good"). What, exactly, is "gender"? What is the relation, if any, of "gender" and childbirth? Does "equal" mean "the same"? If not, in what respects do the equal parties differ? In the United States, our economic system does not value women’s work contributions as much as men’s. The work is valued the same - as work. If women were cheaper to employ than men, then employers would want more of them. We believe tha…
/r/MensRights30/11/18 03:17 AM
2

Is this any of you fellows here? lol ​
/r/MensRights30/11/18 01:29 AM
2

feminists cybersquat on a lot of subreddits. They get control of the board and then use it for their own purposes. They introduce heavy censorship Yes, they are exploiting everyone's innate female preference. It works. You can see the same attempts being made here with the plethora of "concern trolls". Some of them are quite subtle.
/r/MensRights30/11/18 12:56 AM
1

claim everything is sexual harassment and scream patriarchy They are extracting assets from the men, any way that works. In that case, weaponizing male moral conventions. they are actually attracted to and enjoy the company of men They are attracted to and enjoy being around where the resources are. ​
/r/MensRights29/11/18 08:12 PM
1

Masculinity: the users. Toxic masculinity? - feminists. Fragile masculinity? How fragile masculinity was related to voting behavior Ah! Politicians. Not sure which is worse.
/r/MensRights29/11/18 07:25 PM
2

What "viewers" were outrage Those viewers who made the Twitter comments that appeared in the article. If you read the comments to the Daily Mail article, you'll see that there is no shortage of them there too.
/r/MensRights28/11/18 11:11 PM
2

Deep.
/r/MensRights28/11/18 06:16 AM
3

they don’t seem like they really have a unified platform. Their trademark flavor of sour nastiness is consistent over the years.
/r/MensRights27/11/18 06:24 PM
0

not an indication the word should be retired We can't have enough terms of abuse, eh? Especially for use against men (spit). ​
/r/MensRights27/11/18 04:26 AM
1

whores, gold-diggers, welfare queens All offensive terms of abuse. the incels, the neckbeards Also offensive terms of abuse. Consider your motivations.
/r/MensRights27/11/18 04:20 AM
15

Prof. Simona Sharoni The constant use of toxic masculinity has led me to wonder about toxic femininity, whether it exists or not, and, if it does, what it would look like. Maybe a candidate for that is the quality displayed by this woman in the incident described in the article. As to the toxicity, it certainly was toxic to Prof. Richard Ned Lebow's reputation. The particular characteristic is that it amounted to an attack on his reputation, behind his back, and not in itself being a response to…
/r/MensRights26/11/18 09:53 AM
1

Well, I watched the video. No answers there.
/r/MensRights26/11/18 12:36 AM
2

If I could describe modern day feminism, it would be like this: the ugliest form of hypocrisy the modern day world has to offer. That's a good start. Now you have to work on historical day feminism.
/r/MensRights25/11/18 11:50 PM
1

the Tate Modern Thus qualifying as "art". Oh well.
/r/MensRights25/11/18 11:43 PM
7

"Thots" versus "incels". Both terms recently made up. ​ What will they think of next? ​ I guess we'll just have to wait for the next meeting of the "Creatives" to find out.
/r/MensRights25/11/18 11:24 PM
2

angry incel neckbeards I'm very concerned about the bad impression you are making using this sort of language. We all want you to get your point across, to really understand where you are coming from, and communicating in this way just isn't the best way of doing that. So try to calm down and not get too excited when discussing these topics... I know it's difficult but it's all for your own good and the best presentation of your cause. I have your best interests at heart. Really.
/r/MensRights25/11/18 07:00 PM
3

Candid verbality, cellular dishonesty.
/r/MensRights25/11/18 06:48 PM
11

Femorrhoids
/r/MensRights25/11/18 06:30 PM
1

I was happy to find (or I believed at the time) that the TwoX auto-ban rumors were not real, TwoX was not the echo chamber, and the mods were not the thought-police, as is the common belief on Reddit. After being banned now, for literally nothing, I see I was wrong. Every time you hear NAWALT, think back to this. Are subs like that any use? Yes, they give an insight into what we're up against. Read and be appalled.
/r/MensRights25/11/18 02:56 AM
4

In Ireland a majority of students are women ... so, in the interests of gender equality, we are going to hear about measures to increase the proportion of men, right? Actually, no. We're going to ignore that. and academic appointments at the more junior lecturer grades are held in about equal proportion between men and women and it has been this way for many years. They're equal! So we're going to ignore that, at least, eh? Measures that enable women to achieve the top academic grade will establ…
/r/MensRights25/11/18 02:13 AM
54

I explain that I am having a shit and I will be done when I am done. A true Shitlord.
/r/MensRights25/11/18 01:33 AM
19

That's a traditionally "oppressed woman" from the heyday of male supremacy, eh?
/r/MensRights25/11/18 01:29 AM
11

Are men's movements a new form of terrorism? Somebody's rule (I forget who) is that the correct answer to any headline in this format is "No". Which it is in this case, but it brings the suggestion into the general consciousness, in such a sneaky way as to not excite any opposition. It's written by someone who wants Men’s Rights Groups to be Terrorists. Who, and why? Dr Joshua Roose is director of the Institute for Religion, Politics and Society at Australian Catholic University. It would give h…
/r/MensRights25/11/18 12:19 AM
2

the mod message accused me of being a incel That's why the term was invented. Apparently, we are always in need of more terms of abuse. So, it will be used in connection with men's anything, whenever the user wants to be abusive against men, without having any basis in fact.
/r/MensRights23/11/18 09:46 PM
59

https://nextshark.com/park-dae-sung-mma-fighter-accused-of-harassment/
/r/MensRights23/11/18 09:39 PM
15

Once rape juries have gone, juries in all other cases will not be far behind. Yep
/r/MensRights23/11/18 07:15 PM
18

Thepatman, in his own words: [–]thepatman[M] [score hidden] 7 hours ago stickied comment I have no idea where you MRA chowderheads got the idea that this was somehow a 'safe space' for your anti-women complaints about domestic violence, but this ain't it. We're not doing the MRA thing here. Nor are we doing the "wimminz lie about DV to put poor men in jail!" As always, if you can't behave, you can't play. ​ Then he selectively deletes comments. Contemptible. ​
/r/MensRights23/11/18 07:07 PM
3

Bad title. Should be "foreskin pride is ineffective as an intactivist argument".
/r/MensRights22/11/18 07:56 PM
7

https://nextshark.com/park-dae-sung-mma-fighter-accused-of-harassment/
/r/MensRights22/11/18 07:37 PM
17

"phimosis occurs more often than meatal steanosis A contributor to the incidence of phimosis is the ignorant practice of forcefully retracting the foreskin in infants, so tearing the adhesion to the glans, which is the natural state at that age. Much better to not fiddle with their genitals at all, eh?
/r/MensRights21/11/18 08:57 PM
1

i reject the idea of having days for something in general. So prosecute your campaign with a day that most have actually heard of, for example, oh I dunno, International Women's Day, or Mothers Day, or something. Don't waste your valuable time talking down a day few know even exists. You know it makes sense.
/r/MensRights21/11/18 08:38 PM
12

More than 800 years since trial by jury became a right, we have to ... do away with them. The collapse of civil society can't be far behind.
/r/MensRights21/11/18 08:32 PM
2

Buried in the regional news, so that the idea gets out there without attracting too much opposition. This is a trial balloon going up.
/r/MensRights21/11/18 08:03 PM
3

Nah. Google does what Google does, or to put it another way, shitbags do what bags of shit do. It's just their nature. You can't fight them without getting covered in it, so it's better to go with the flow. Every year, let them ignore it; that just gives us the opportunity, every year, to make something of that. This year, we didn't do too bad; next year, point out their hypocrisy at ten times the volume.
/r/MensRights20/11/18 04:01 AM
3

... and Helen Pluckrose's response: ​ https://areomagazine.com/2018/11/12/a-response-to-portland-states-vanguards-anonymous-letter/ ​
/r/MensRights20/11/18 12:14 AM
2

​ Boghossian’s response https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kG3QYbDeZso ​
/r/MensRights19/11/18 11:43 PM
10

Just what the world needs, more fat women.
/r/MensRights19/11/18 04:41 PM
2

What a virtuous institution the BBC is! Not a vehicle for state propaganda at all! Don't try not to pay them their entirely reasonable fee, because then they might not be able to support women so much! And the state might come after you,or something, but remember, women.
/r/MensRights19/11/18 04:38 PM
3

Could be a trailer for a horror film about vampires. But no, just a scene from everyday life. This "director" is sick, and seems to want everyone else to be sick like him too.
/r/MensRights16/11/18 04:06 PM
1

How do you predict that men would never be appreciated as women and children are? It's not a prediction, it's an explanation for the unbalanced phenomenon pointed out in the OP.
/r/MensRights16/11/18 03:00 PM
2

It's because the Virtuous Man is seen as the one who supports and protects women and children. This is instinctive and will never change. So, when Men's Day comes around, we celebrate the Manly Virtues (in practice, this boils down to just the one virtue). Since men have now defeated just about all the natural enemies of women and children, the only thing left to go on about is the means they used to do it. Against women and children of course, the usual victims; willing or not, they must play t…
/r/MensRights16/11/18 06:37 AM
1

Financial Times tool This is an article from a rival newspaper. The archive has caught The Guardian in it's habitual begging mode (a yellow Support Us entreaty superimposed over their masthead) so I'm guessing it's just professional jealousy. The Guardian is full of feminists, so how come the Financial Times is doing better? It's just not fair ... If either newspaper really wanted to incorporate more women, they could just copy the much more successful Daily Mail. No messing around there; the la…
/r/MensRights15/11/18 11:45 PM
1

"There's no fool like an old fool"
/r/MensRights15/11/18 10:39 PM
3

Once again, it was a recording that got him out of trouble. ​ Those of you who think that always using a body cam is "overreacting", think on.
/r/MensRights15/11/18 10:24 PM
1

Something else they got set up yesterday was an "Inequality Bakesale." In this bakesale, the males had to pay more for the same goods as the girls, This again. And again. And again. At least the "leave 7 minutes early" I never heard of before, although it does seem to me that the correct way to calculate it is to use whatever time the boys leave early on every other day of the year. But I digress... In another recent post here https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/9wn4zm/creative_director…
/r/MensRights14/11/18 02:50 AM
3

Whatever the "facts" of the case, it's plain that women's ingroup solidarity trumps political intraparty solidarity. Jenny Leong, a Greens MP, was carried into power along with the group action of the Greens as a whole: "I've been democratically elected to the parliament and to the NSW Greens Legislative Council ticket by a ballot of all members," Mr Buckingham said in a statement. Elections? That's so in the past, Jeremy! What have you done for us lately? To have any effect, it is essential for…
/r/MensRights14/11/18 12:34 AM
5

It's a monstrous deception. I think you could argue that it was rape. "In the public interest" my arse.
/r/MensRights13/11/18 09:09 PM
7

the leadership is all female Is that true all the way up? I'm wondering about the possibility that an ultimate top male will seek to insulate his position from challenges from male rivals by appointing women to power positions immediately below him.
/r/MensRights13/11/18 08:44 PM
5

International Fucking Day.
/r/MensRights12/11/18 08:28 PM
5

They have that covered: The report of an expert group chaired by former EU commissioner Máire Geoghegan Quinn in 2016 began the process to address gender inequality at third-level. But the task force established by Ms Mitchell O’Connor last year has come up with further recommendations and targets. The women-only posts will be created in disciplines with clear evidence of significant under-representation by women. The Irish Examiner understands that this move has been assessed and cleared by the…
/r/MensRights12/11/18 05:58 AM
1

having a civilised conversation As the OP remarked: The weirdest thing about them is, every now and then one of them is real but I've noticed the majority of the accounts that do this tend not to respond. ... and you can't really have a conversation, civilized or otherwise, when only you are talking. However, other people may read you, and replying to them is a good way to get your own thoughts in order.
/r/MensRights12/11/18 05:20 AM
1

Pedantic grammar point: She thicc, he swole. Both af.
/r/MensRights12/11/18 12:16 AM
2

They can still be given a straight answer That's one of the ways of calling them out.
/r/MensRights12/11/18 12:08 AM
1

He was acquitted. Underwear is fairly well along in the process, so there must be other stuff about the encounter that we are not being told about. Seems to me that the outrage trolls have seized on this attention-grabbing image and are playing it for everything they can get out of it.
/r/MensRights11/11/18 08:38 PM
3

and shrug off Yeah right. "Oi, darling, there's a hair in my soup! Doesn't look like it's from your head, gettit sweetie? Har har har..." ​ Lawsuit incoming... ​
/r/MensRights11/11/18 08:03 PM
3

I encourage users to just downvote these NPCs rather than attempt to engage them if they don't bother responding after posting. That's the better way to handle them, rather than banning; or maybe even better, point them out whenever you detect them, like for example tends to happen with "concern trolls". Otherwise, they continue to hide from sight and pop out unexpectedly. They need a name, perhaps something like "category troll".
/r/MensRights11/11/18 07:39 PM
5

the chick with the big Nah, she thicc, brah.
/r/MensRights11/11/18 10:40 AM
3

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k7C7d0e_HJo
/r/MensRights11/11/18 03:59 AM
2

Not the latest. It's well over a decade old. I remember Angry Harry getting worked up about it, back around then.
/r/MensRights11/11/18 03:53 AM
7

Who let the MRA/rape apologists in? They always leave a mess, they never bring any good snacks, and they're rude to our friends. If we've told you once, we've told you a thousand times "They can only come in if they're housebroken." Think about that next time you open BOLA's doors to a bunch of mid-20's white guys who can't even look a girl in the eye. Look a girl in the eye, eh. Surprised they didn't start going on about incels, seems to be the latest obsession of these types. Anyway, there's n…
/r/MensRights10/11/18 05:22 AM
2

it is not as if men can start having children That's what's wrong with blind instinct. It's always been that the women ask, the men deliver... except in this case. Maybe eventually men will deliver via auto-wombs, but that's still science fiction for now. import people and a different culture By the second generation, they will have adopted the habits of the host population, and be below replacement themselves.
/r/MensRights09/11/18 10:33 AM
3

The researchers said the findings were a "huge surprise". All those highly respected researchers, doing the very best research, and they got it wrong. Why? it is being put down to three key factors: Fewer deaths in childhood meaning women have fewer babies Yes, but there are fewer deaths. The researchers seem to have ignored that. Maybe they're a bit stupid. Greater access to contraception That sounds reasonable. More women in education and work Yep. That means they have less time and energy for…
/r/MensRights09/11/18 10:11 AM
2

Where the lols lie, there loll I.
/r/MensRights09/11/18 03:15 AM
55

I don’t know whether it’s a power thing It's a power thing. To see this, try suggesting she get those creepy flaps of flesh either side of her head removed because you'd prefer her that way. If you succeed, you will be exercising Male Power! Let us know how you get on! ​
/r/MensRights08/11/18 10:25 AM
3

Medusa. https://qz.com/quartzy/1408600/the-medusa-statue-that-became-a-symbol-of-feminist-rage/ ​ The monstrous being with snakes for hair starts out as a human woman, who Poseidon rapes in Athena’s temple. The goddess then punishes Medusa by turning her into a Gorgon and exiling her. Perseus is later sent on an errand to bring Medusa’s head to King Polydectes. Equipped with a mirrored shield, winged sandals, and a special sack for her head, Perseus creeps up on Medusa while she lies sleeping, c…
/r/MensRights08/11/18 10:03 AM
3

The usual collection of parasites. What if dads can't pay child support? Attorney Randy Kessler Pay something Yep, pay. And pay, And pay. Judge Gail Tusan Make a good-faith effort Judges are quite aware that people lose their jobs and times can be tough. But "But". Oh. I wonder how often the good judge has lost her job, with tough times and jail. ​ Therapist Ephrat Lipton Don't get mad No, no, no! Just calm down! My bill for that useful professional advice will come to... ​
/r/MensRights07/11/18 10:01 PM
3

Then why not join feminism Your entreaty would carry more weight had you even attempted an answer to his question.
/r/MensRights06/11/18 11:52 PM
3

If this sub actually wants to be taken seriously, Thank you for your concern.
/r/MensRights05/11/18 05:35 AM
31

Circumcised men have more difficulties reaching orgasm, Oh, who cares... and their female partners experience more vaginal pains and an inferior sex life You mean it affects females??? Now that's serious!!! We need to do something, quick!
/r/MensRights05/11/18 03:50 AM
3

my child places me on full ghost mode. It's been three weeks and I haven't spoken to her. You've been the object of negative propaganda from your ex. There's nothing you can do about this but wait it out. As you say: I engaged a lawyer but really at 15 my kid will be able to say 'nope I want to live with my mother'. It's a losing battle. Yes That was clearly explained but I don't care. It's just a few grand less for my (imaginary?) child. You will likely make matters worse by "fighting". Save yo…
/r/MensRights03/11/18 12:01 PM
2

The cover image depicts the Cave of the Patriarchs, Hebron. The Cave is the Secret Headquarters of The Global Patriarchy. ​ Always wondered where that was.
/r/MensRights31/10/18 09:53 PM
1

birthrates have been plummeting in Western civilization. In all rich countries, not just "Western". There's many arguments to why this has been happening. No-one seems to mention the real (in my opinion) reason... technological progress has cheapened the value of work in the home to the point where there is an economic pressure on families that both partners work. Of course, most who discuss this fail to mention family law and the legal system. Stuck in the past, when economic conditions were di…
/r/MensRights31/10/18 04:14 AM
5

“For example,” says Lauro, “we don’t ask ‘have you ever beaten your partner?’ Instead, we ask, ‘how often have you beaten your partner?’” The idea is to remove the cues that would push respondents toward the “correct” response. ​ Tsk. It should be "When did you stop beating your partner?" Feminists... can't get anything right.
/r/MensRights31/10/18 03:55 AM
9

https://www.histomania.org/photo/23/belgium_coal_miners_crammed_into_a_coal_mine_elevator_coming_up_after_a_day_of_work_circa_1900 ​ ​
/r/MensRights27/10/18 11:50 AM
24

she's not "in higher education" She's doing a physics course. ​
/r/MensRights25/10/18 02:53 PM
1

To summarize: ​ So when it comes to finding men guilty, Kaitlin believes if a woman doesn’t say yes, it’s rape. And if a woman does say yes, that’s rape too, because she “didn’t really mean it.” You see, words always mean exactly what they say, except when they don’t, so long as men are always the ones responsible. ​
/r/MensRights25/10/18 05:36 AM
1

Got two thirds of the way through before giving up, or throwing up more like. Why do you do this to us, OP? ​ Should be recommended listening though for the NAWALTs and singers of the "you'll be OK - false accusations are so rare" song. This woman, at least, is like that, and getting attention for it.
/r/MensRights25/10/18 03:01 AM
2

Are you sure you want to tweet this? It's sarcasm, and you know the confusion that always causes. Might be better to go to the original inspiration https://www.thecollegefix.com/hundreds-of-sex-toys-doled-out-to-coeds-as-university-hosts-free-vibrator-day ​ but even that is a PoeAGeddon: ​ “There is a major orgasm gap between the genders,” McDevitt told The College Fix. ​
/r/MensRights25/10/18 01:51 AM
31

this type of incident “would never happen to a white boy.” Wouldn't it?
/r/MensRights24/10/18 12:14 PM
6

Only a giant pussy would worry about that.
/r/MensRights23/10/18 08:57 PM
14

Incels, virginities, looks like you've got an unhealthy obsession there.
/r/MensRights23/10/18 12:22 PM
10

paranoid scared little puppies More like: more able to cope in difficult situations. “make sure to record your interactions with women boys, cause she just might accuse you of false rape”. That’s terrible fucking advice No it isn't. It's giving them more capability to handle themselves should the unexpected happen. You seem to be trying to reduce their effectiveness in this situation. Is this a way of aggrandizing yourself by comparison? Your advice is more akin to walking around with a fire ext…
/r/MensRights23/10/18 12:19 PM
10

Your advice might be useful were you to give at least one practical way of changing society.
/r/MensRights23/10/18 11:59 AM
21

Ah. A troll...
/r/MensRights23/10/18 11:52 AM
20

You’re grooming young boys to grow up and be giant pussies though Nope. You're enabling them to take a reasonable precaution. These days, recording equipment is affordable. And if you're in the lucky 99%, then you don't have to use the recording at all. But if on the other hand, you aren't, then it could be a life saver. Your argument could be applied to situations like not having smoke alarms in your house. 99% of the time, you'll be ok. Only a giant pussy would worry about ...OMG!!! Suppose yo…
/r/MensRights23/10/18 11:45 AM
17

it’s not women that are your enemies, it’s the government and laws and a small portion of the population abusing these laws. How does that affect what you need to do to protect yourself? Making young boys scared of interaction with girls is not the right path for men’s rights. I suppose that all the "young boys" need to do is to simply override the government and laws. They're male, should be simple, just apply some of that privilege, right? We need to engage the opposite sex and get them on our…
/r/MensRights23/10/18 11:21 AM
11

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-sunny-side-of-smut/
/r/MensRights23/10/18 11:01 AM
1

Maybe make the hero more of an abstraction of sorts. It may already be an abstraction. How do you define "hero"? For example, is a sportsman, say a world champion in something, a "hero"? Sports are a well known analogy for war. What about an outstanding musician - they are often objects of admiration. How about a Nobel Prize winner? If you imagine women in any of these roles, does that change the picture? Come to that, could you describe, meaningfully in terms of your idea, any woman as a "hero"…
/r/MensRights23/10/18 05:09 AM
1

the gender-equality paradox A paradox indicates you've got something wrong. In this case, what's wrong is that both terms - gender and equality - are both ill defined and useless for reasoning about. However, they are useful for arguing with, because you can change the meaning to suit your statement of the moment, as convenient. Any objection to this dishonest practice can be met with insinuations that the opponent is too stupid, too uneducated, too ignorant to understand these subtle distinctio…
/r/MensRights22/10/18 09:11 PM
9

“Feminism is insanity from the standpoint of a normal person,” said Vitaly Milonov But of course! One of those who is currently being prosecuted for her feminist views is blogger Lyubov Kalugina. She was charged with extremism on Sept. 4 after an unidentified man complained that her social media posts offended him as a male. Sensible folk, those Russians. ​ ​
/r/MensRights21/10/18 11:41 AM
1

What makes you think I assume? You wrote I would argue in needs to be a whole separate trial. implying the assumption that finding an accused not guilty is equal to finding the accuser guilty. It isn't.
/r/MensRights20/10/18 12:51 AM
1

Would love to see the study Not sure if its the study he meant, but see https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/6440589/Date-rape-drink-spiking-an-urban-legend.html ​ A study of more than 200 students revealed many wrongly blamed the effects of a "bad night out" on date-rape drugs, when they had just drunk excessively. Many are in "active denial" that drinking large amounts of alcohol can leave them "incoherent and incapacitated", the Kent University researchers concluded. Young women's fe…
/r/MensRights20/10/18 12:40 AM
1

Wouldn’t punishing false accuser disincentivise people who make false rape claims from being truthful? After they've made the accusation, in the current climate, yes. But look forward to the situation after it's the standard thing to prosecute for false accusations. Then the prospective false accusers have something realistic to think about. Would this require it’s own separate trial? Of course it would.
/r/MensRights19/10/18 11:59 PM
3

Tell me why my thought process is wrong Your assumption that the legal process returns a truth value is wrong. As in I would argue in needs to be a whole separate trial. Of course there needs to be a whole separate trial. It's quite possible, I would think likely, that both accused and accuser are found not guilty. ​
/r/MensRights19/10/18 11:49 PM
1

No, it’s really not. I'm being pedantic, but yes, it really is. One data point, you have something; no data points, you have nothing. You have to compare subjects in a study to reach a pattern of behavior or a pattern of scientific change. OK. But you seem to have reached your own conclusion, which you believe strongly enough to be arguing for, based on no data.
/r/MensRights18/10/18 01:55 AM
1

It's infinitely better than a study with no subjects.
/r/MensRights18/10/18 01:37 AM
1

How is it a Muslim issue in the US? I was talking world-wide. I think Jewish culture is a large part why we do circumcision today. Dr Kellogg was pretty influential, and he was coming from an anti-masturbation direction. As for religion: John Harvey Kellogg, M.D. was an American medical doctor, nutritionist, inventor, health activist, and businessman. He was the director of the Battle Creek Sanitarium in Battle Creek, Michigan. The sanitarium was founded by members of the Seventh-day Adventist C…
/r/MensRights18/10/18 01:33 AM
1

a small percentage of nurses using feelings over facts Indeed... a group of nurses who were attempting to organize a protest against male infant circumcision in Kinston General Hospital. They said that their observations indicated that babies undergoing the procedure were subjected to significant and inhumane levels of pain that subsequently adversely affected their behaviours. ​ And then... they said that they needed some scientific support for their position. It was my idea to use fMRI and/or …
/r/MensRights18/10/18 01:27 AM
1

heavy duty Jewish culture Oh, the Jew stuff. Lay off the Jew stuff. Numerically, it's more a Moslem matter. I hesitate to mention this, because of the [citation needed] culture, but in the early days of the Internet I remember reading a claim from a guy who asserted he was circumcised because he was Catholic. In the US, it's more bizarre health benefits than religion, although both apply. ​ ​ ​
/r/MensRights18/10/18 01:16 AM
1

A blog post that reports a study.
/r/MensRights18/10/18 01:09 AM
3

It definitely feels like it is being skewed. Why? Because it's tied in to the mysteries of life, death, sex, and Coming Of Age, male style. Once having been established, everyone looks the other way because it's uncomfortable to look at objectively. People can't process the topic properly, and look around for justifications, any justification; anything that looks vaguely plausible is seized on without further examination. That's why we have so many different "health benefits" and religious justi…
/r/MensRights18/10/18 12:55 AM
3

Maybe not "damaged", but permanently altered. http://www.drmomma.org/2009/10/mri-studies-brain-permanently-altered.html Permanently altered ... by a violent and abnormal act.
/r/MensRights18/10/18 12:37 AM
11

Worth knowing though. ​
/r/MensRights14/10/18 11:44 PM
4

I don't see your comment there. Possibly only you can see it. ​ There are other odd things about this item. It's dated September 26, 2018, yet refers to Theresa May as Home Secretary, and the Serious Crime Act 2015, which was passed by Parliament "earlier this year."
/r/MensRights14/10/18 11:35 PM
2

texting and having written documentation In situations like this, document everything, don't throw anything away; but keep it secret and use it only if you absolutely have to. Don't text, don't talk to anyone about her, don't display any overt interest, but collect everything. Is allowing the school administration to potentially step in really a bad choice? If they step in by themselves (which would really be at her instigation, direct or indirect) that's bad news. My advice would be to keep awa…
/r/MensRights14/10/18 06:34 PM
1

In what way is this relevant to the OP's remark: My thinking is that since everyone has a different sense of personal space, and a small violation of this personal space even by accident can end up with you being up on someone's Twitter profile with the dreaded hashtag. which is about the amplification of (even accidental) slights by Twitter. This is a recent phenomenon. Are you denying that? Or trying to talk it into non-existence?
/r/MensRights14/10/18 06:42 AM
1

I would be getting death stares from people who I’ve barely talked to before. This is a sign that malicious tales are being told about you behind your back. The obvious candidate here is her. I would see my ex there The only thing that works in this situation is to cut off all contact. Also, because of the malicious gossip situation, you need to have nothing to do with the group of people she talks to. (This can be difficult to arrange). and we wouldn’t talk, but she’d leave as soon as I showed …
/r/MensRights14/10/18 06:17 AM
1

You respect women, you believe in women, you like women, you don’t hit women or rape women or in any way abuse women. You have applauded and funded feminism for a half-century. You are one of the good men. That's his mistake, if he wanted martial harmony. All that stuff conflicts with her real inner desires, her instinctive image of what a proper man should be, and after a lifetime of getting what she demands of him (but does not really want), it all boils over into her diatribe of vituperation.…
/r/MensRights13/10/18 11:46 AM
8

Sign of financial abuse number 3: Only giving a spouse a limited amount of money per month to spend. ​ Lisa Kindel knows all about financial abuse - from personal experience. "After taking money from my account for cigarettes, I forced my ex-spouse to get a bank account a year before he left," says Kindel, owner of LRKindel Media in Frankfort, Ken. "This infuriated him - he wanted to know why he couldn't use my bank account." Kindel says that every month, the couple would go over bills that need…
/r/MensRights13/10/18 11:26 AM
5

It's a legitimate sub for men's rights. This means opposition to those who are against men's rights, and this very often is feminists and their hangers-on.
/r/MensRights13/10/18 11:20 AM
6

The explicit reasons for Pence’s restriction are religion and family, but the implicit reason is that he must avoid alone-time with women lest his stringent religious moral code fall apart in the presence of a little lipstick and décolletage. That is rape culture. She has it backwards. It's not the failure of his moral code that he's worried about. She acknowledges that herself: ​ And if, in 2017, he believes they remain such fallen, lascivious things that he can’t possibly be in a room alone wi…
/r/MensRights13/10/18 11:15 AM
3

Yes, it appears not to be in r/news, although it shows up in five other subreddits. They could be acting clever with the "Already Submitted" flair. It's possible that it has already been submitted, but that was removed too.
/r/MensRights13/10/18 10:59 AM
2

I'm saying that everyone has a responsibility to not transmit bad information, to the best of their ability. When someone is caught breaking a law, and claims immunity from the consequence because they were ignorant of the law, that excuse doesn't work, and is dismissed with the saying "Ignorance of the law is no excuse". What the lady in question did verged in the direction of insanity rather than criminality. As you say, they go to a psychiatric ward rather than to jail, but they are still rem…
/r/MensRights11/10/18 10:13 AM
2

I don't recall meeting even a single man in my life who was victim to a false accusation A possible explanation of that is: you never heard an accusation that you didn't believe.
/r/MensRights11/10/18 06:03 AM
7

A typical MRM member is a conservative, white male. Age ranges from teenagers to elderly men. Sometimes, even women join. Women in the MRM are often forced into it by their husbands. There are accounts of women being beaten by their husbands if they speak against it. LOL This movement is gaining numbers quickly and effectively. It is a scary notion ... Hysteria increases.
/r/MensRights11/10/18 05:24 AM
8

Results showed that participants rated girls as less academically capable than boys in psychics What on earth are they teaching in schools these days? ​ ​
/r/MensRights11/10/18 02:42 AM
5

Men's rights and left-right politics are on separate axes. "Right" and "left" have just about lost their meaning through overuse. The danger lies in losing the thread of a discussion on rights when it get co-opted into the latest inter-party tussle. ​ ​
/r/MensRights11/10/18 02:28 AM
3

black man ​ Racist, or sexist? ​ Trick question. It's intersectional .
/r/MensRights10/10/18 11:39 PM
13

I certainly had never heard about bedbugs causing memory lapses. But drug-injecting rapist boyfriends, you heard plenty about, eh. But this does serve as an important reminder not to jump to conclusions. Sure does.
/r/MensRights10/10/18 11:08 PM
1

​ In what way? What is your reaction to "Ignorance of the law is no excuse"? ​
/r/MensRights10/10/18 09:16 PM
1

You advance a recipe for irresponsibility. No good will come of that.
/r/MensRights10/10/18 09:09 PM
2

Video at ​ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I7uU36UcVOs ​ ​
/r/MensRights10/10/18 08:59 PM
1

there is no reason she is in any way bad Yes there is. She was an agent of badness, through being ignorant. She has a responsibility to get it right; we all do. In a parallel situation, "ignorance of the law is no excuse".
/r/MensRights10/10/18 08:32 PM
4

Ex-teacher handed 'lenient' 90-day sentence for sexual encounters with student ​ A gender neutral headline! How many speed readers will assume the usual victims and the usual bunch of bastards perpetrators?
/r/MensRights10/10/18 08:25 PM
2

I guess her advice would extend to men not "mentoring women" at work, right?
/r/MensRights10/10/18 08:18 PM
3

a ‘more balanced programme’ Yes, let's have some "balance". The University of York has postponed a talk on Brexit because there were no left-handed speakers on the eight-person panel. Professor Lawrence Black, head of the Department of History, said in a statement: “It has come to my attention that a conference organised to explore issues related to Brexit and History has an all-right-handed speaker list. “The current handedness balance reflected in this conference programme does not reflect tho…
/r/MensRights10/10/18 07:49 PM
5

that pile of steaming garbage sub. You guys post shit from that sub and say that ‘well it’s content.’ This is a form of ad hominem - attacking the source of the information rather than the information itself. Yes, it's "content", and you haven't dealt with it.
/r/MensRights10/10/18 10:28 AM
1

How would this help against a false accusation?
/r/MensRights10/10/18 10:21 AM
10

Seems like there was a real problem here. The likely diagnosis: You mentioned red bumps on your thigh, insomnia, memory loss, paranoia and anxiety? Pull the sheets off your mattress please. Check in the little creases for brown specs or encrusted brown flakes. These symptoms sounds eerily famaliar to what happened to a friend of mine. We thought he was going crazy. Turns out he was having a severe reaction to long term bedbug bites. You mentioned that you remember everything that hapoened at his…
/r/MensRights10/10/18 10:07 AM
11

James's situation is different: He was cleared, and is now enjoying his sophomore year at UC-Davis. In some sense, the process worked. ​ "Enjoying". Probably could have enjoyed things even more had he avoided going to the very stinky University of California-Davis in the first place. In some sense, the process worked. ​ In what sense did the process work? Read on... ​ He had to recount the intimate details of an amorous encounter to university administrators, ... university administrators, paid …
/r/MensRights10/10/18 12:22 AM
2

Karen Straughan's take: ​ https://owningyourshit.blogspot.com/2018/10/its-not-very-often-that-i-disagree-with.html ​
/r/MensRights08/10/18 06:32 PM
1

Never Trust Women's Words—Only Trust Their Actions True enough; but it applies to men too.
/r/MensRights07/10/18 10:03 PM
3

many of the matters which they have previously vocalized as “assault” – were in fact situations precipitated by their own uncontrolled sexual libido – Yep and poor decision making on their own part. No, not poor decisions. Not only do they get off on it, they get to cash in later when the truth of male oppression is demonstrated yet again. Orgasms and cash, what's not to like?
/r/MensRights07/10/18 09:44 PM
39

Human race faces extinction ... women most affected.
/r/MensRights07/10/18 09:34 PM
2

Too late! He's already talking to her...
/r/MensRights07/10/18 09:23 PM
20

Ah, the US. What a shithole.
/r/MensRights07/10/18 09:12 PM
27

“All of them deserve miserable deaths while feminists laugh as they take their last gasps. Bonus: we castrate their corpses and feed them to swine,” she added. After a lifetime of uncritical support, the butterflies of feminism feel bold enough to emerge from their caterpillar stage in the naked splendor of their true colors. Stand by for mass displays of fawning admiration.
/r/MensRights07/10/18 09:10 PM
1

Typical nasty Guardian crap. You seem to have omitted the "Anti-MRM" flair, Mr Beneficial.
/r/MensRights07/10/18 08:51 PM
1

Don't know about Harvard. It's just the one that Google came up with.
/r/MensRights07/10/18 12:01 PM
1

(b) ​
/r/MensRights07/10/18 12:00 PM
1

I'm not sure about the name "Ayelet" ​ http://thewilsoncentre.ca/dr-ayelet-kuper/ ​
/r/MensRights07/10/18 11:59 AM
9

https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1113&context=iph_theses ​ RESULTS: This study shows an inverse association (OR=0.508; 95% CI: 0.376-0.687) between FGM and HIV/AIDS after adjusting for confounding variables. DISCUSSION: The inverse association between FGM and HIV/AIDS established in this study suggests a possible protective effect of female circumcision against HIV/AIDS. This finding suggests therefore the need to authenticate this inverse association in different populat…
/r/MensRights07/10/18 04:46 AM
10

In response, some men in positions of power now say they are afraid to participate in mentoring relationships with women. ​ I'm puzzled by this term "mentoring". Sort of like "teaching" I guess. But why do we see it used always in the context of women? ​ In a study focused on engaging men in gender-equity initiatives, 74% of male senior business managers cited fear as a barrier to men’s support for gender equity.4 A 2018 survey of nearly 3000 employed U.S. adults found that some men have stopped…
/r/MensRights07/10/18 01:27 AM
44

Children of divorced couples would spend the exact same amount of time living with each parent — young children currently tend to live with their mothers — and each parent would pay for the children’s needs when taking care of them. If one parent were unable to pay, the wealthier parent would pay for those needs directly rather than writing a check to his or her ex-spouse. Sounds like an excellent arrangement; a distinct improvement on what we have now.
/r/MensRights21/09/18 01:40 AM
3

You are treated the same as if you are innocent. Yes. As far as the legal system is concerned, this is the meaning of "innocence"; that is, the legal system won't take the physical actions against you that it would had you been found guilty. You, personally, are free to believe that the accused did it, irrespective of the judgement of the legal system. However, if you were to act physically against the accused based on your belief that he did it, then you, not being the legal system, are on thin…
/r/MensRights20/09/18 09:10 PM
2

Not guilty is not the same as innocent Legally, yes it is, because innocence is presumed.
/r/MensRights20/09/18 11:13 AM
3

The only major sites to carry this story ... in English ... are Russian sites. Why not try looking at Swedish language items? For example http://academicrightswatch.se/?p=3413 After all, Germund Hesslow is a Swede working at A Swedish university. If you don't want anything to do with Russian sites, don't wait for them to do the translations for you; try translating it yourself. There are mechanical aides available.
/r/MensRights18/09/18 06:03 AM
1

It's okay to be a man; Men's rights are human rights; Men are good; Men's lives matter too; elam - male; Straughan independent woman; Men's rights; MRA
/r/MensRights14/09/18 09:22 PM
5

Sadly, you're an idiot ...I am a fashion expert. Oh, have it your way.
/r/MensRights09/09/18 07:47 PM
5

Now I'm wondering. Can it possibly be true that you really believe all that crap about sand and smegma?
/r/MensRights09/09/18 07:19 PM
5

Against n you understood. Losers who crtiseze a spelling error are losers. You're getting less and less understandable.
/r/MensRights09/09/18 07:07 PM
5

my communication is fine Oh dear.
/r/MensRights09/09/18 07:01 PM
4

But correct spelling leads to better communication. You'd want that, wouldn't you?
/r/MensRights09/09/18 06:50 PM
7

fuckoff idiot Tsk. Such language! Spelling, too.
/r/MensRights09/09/18 06:46 PM
3

the veil over his face? That's adding protection, not taking it away. Seems like you're not very observant Unlike you, eh?
/r/MensRights09/09/18 06:38 PM
5

Sand in the eyes, even more unpleasant. Guess we'll just have to cut off the eyelids as a cure.
/r/MensRights09/09/18 06:31 PM
6

keep the sand out Seems like they forgot about eyelids.
/r/MensRights09/09/18 06:21 PM
1

Not necessarily either. Heh.
/r/MensRights08/09/18 09:37 PM
3

Of course they do. The head of the CPS is a woman.
/r/MensRights08/09/18 09:30 PM
1

In this case to make a case for better policing standards Which would include either discouraging women from the role, or curing society's sexism again them. Do I understand you correctly?
/r/MensRights08/09/18 02:26 PM
1

I think it's conceivable that sexism would make it more likely for women to feel the need to react aggressively in some situations, but I don't see that as an "excuse" for women or, inversely, any sort of indictment of men Then why mention it?
/r/MensRights08/09/18 01:57 PM
6

Sarah Hanson-Young Who? I'm not familiar with the lady, nor her writings. I, as would most people I think, interpret "men need to stop being pigs and rapists" as "men in general need to stop being pigs and rapists". Still an objectionable sentiment though, even though it doesn't imply all men.
/r/MensRights08/09/18 01:50 PM
22

all women? The quote wasn't "all women", you know. It was "women". This is speaking in generalities, and most people, but not you obviously, would interpret such a term as "women in general". The statement most women prefer family and raising children to working in business is by and large true, in my opinion. However, your experiences may vary from mine, in the same way that your use of language does.
/r/MensRights08/09/18 01:37 PM
1

Seriously, I think that situations where an armed person comes to your door and shoots you out of the blue should be avoided as much as is possible. Your comment: but the female officers I've known have had a bit more of a chip on their shoulder about their authority being taken seriously. I imagine they struggle to get taken as seriously appears to be an advance excuse for specifically women. If you didn't intend that, then why did you make that comment?
/r/MensRights08/09/18 01:23 PM
9

I was left thinking that our culture’s current approach to consent is too narrow. You've really got to hand it to the ladies. Just when I was thinking they could not, positively not, wring any more blood out of the consent turnip, then voilà! ... proved wrong again. I wonder what the legal penalties will be for narrow consent rape.
/r/MensRights08/09/18 01:12 PM
1

Do you see that as a desirable outcome? Do I see what as a desirable outcome?
/r/MensRights08/09/18 12:49 PM
4

Prophetic, not bad for 1976. One or two mistakes though; we have "chairperson" today, but not "dustperson". Similarly, "personhole" hasn't replaced "manhole". Can't think why.
/r/MensRights08/09/18 12:47 PM
2

an argument for police reform Yes, reformed to not give lethal powers to those who have more of a chip on their shoulders, by your own argument - women, inter alia.
/r/MensRights08/09/18 12:38 PM
24

women prefer family and raising children to working in business. He's right.
/r/MensRights08/09/18 12:34 PM
3

This is an argument against giving police powers to women.
/r/MensRights08/09/18 12:20 PM
20

Collins told the judge Friday that McCann had chosen to be homeless because he could not afford both housing and his son’s child support. The US. What a place.
/r/MensRights08/09/18 11:58 AM
5

A white woman shot a black man, so it's "obviously" the fault of white men? I just can't keep up with the smart thinking you get these days.
/r/MensRights08/09/18 11:25 AM
2

You won't believe me Oh, I believe you all right. Conflict situations are the feedstock for identity politicians. They feed on the aggro, they don't care what about.
/r/MensRights30/08/18 11:14 PM
3

Not everyone with a concern is a concern troll. True. You get to find out as they develop their views. Initially plausible, they may have a valid point; but each step leads finally and inevitably to something like "so we all agree, we're all feminists then". It's a variety of bait and switch. Always a multistep process, a real time waster; the sooner you can detect them, the more time you save.
/r/MensRights30/08/18 11:01 PM
4

They include how to prevent tetanus infections during medical circumcision.
/r/MensRights26/08/18 08:31 AM
2

That forum looks to be an identity politician's dream. They quote their ethnicity, meta-ethnicity, ancestry, religion, and DNA results. Gender too, although I've seen only two so far.
/r/MensRights24/08/18 11:15 AM
2

Do tell...
/r/MensRights24/08/18 11:10 AM
12

A Chorley Council domestic homicide review found two GPs had failed to ask the solicitor how he was injured, as did Chorley Hospital's A&E unit in July 2015. I believe this question is routine for injured women. He told a paramedic about the abuse but a failure to follow procedures meant the report was not escalated to managers. Passive voice. Just another anonymous failure. No attribution of blame, no impetus to do anything. A perception that men were not domestic abuse victims may have contrib…
/r/MensRights24/08/18 02:55 AM
2

Iconic wankery. one single woman came up with a controversial and very unusual method to find 'the one' ... Natasha Aponte invited hundreds. One egg, millions of sperms. Yawn. They all thought they were going on a normal Tinder date, but when they arrived they realised that wasn't the case Ah, trickery. This is where it starts to deviate from the biologicals. What's in store for them? A spider-like fate maybe? some of the men saw it as a bit of fun and got involved, aka the Real Men others were …
/r/MensRights24/08/18 02:37 AM
34

“This was not an easy charging decision for the state,” Senior Assistant State’s Attorney Tatiana Messina told the judge. “But with the evidence we had against Miss Yovino, we do believe this disposition is both fair and appropriate. Many true victims of sexual assault are often disbelieved, but that is because of cases like this and the impact they have on public perceptions. Miss Yovino’s actions are a disservice to those true victims, ​ A moment's silence, please, for the True Victims... ​ Oh…
/r/MensRights23/08/18 09:31 PM
3

Another Place For Guys To Run Too? Before running there, take look at their "Toolkit": http://www.mensadviceline.org.uk/help-and-information/frontline-workers-and-male-domestic-violence-victims/toolkit-for-work-with-male-victims-of-domestic-violence/ "Listen and Believe" it ain't. They are very concerned about whether the caller is really really abused, or maybe - he's the abuser! The major subject matter of two whole chapters, as far as I could see. I don't expect callers to women's helplines t…
/r/MensRights23/08/18 06:39 AM
5

A deeply apologetic judge officially dropped all charges Thursday against an innocent man he sent to prison for rape. Manhattan Criminal Court Judge Richard Carruthers said: 'I want to convey to you my personal regret in having participated, though unknowingly, in the injustice committed to you.' '[It is] a catastrophe both for you and for the criminal justice system. 'Given the startling turn of events, I now recant what I said about you when I sentenced you for 20 years in prison for a rape we…
/r/MensRights23/08/18 03:52 AM
2

Look up some opposing views LOL
/r/MensRights22/08/18 10:38 PM
2

The opposite is terrible too. Please don't support that garbage either (aka "her feminism")
/r/MensRights22/08/18 09:58 PM
1

In 18th-century England alone, there were 25 deaths per 1,000 births. With odds like that, there was a legitimate reason to give women extra protection and care that was not afforded to men. Men didn’t have the babies and no society could survive in the long run if it didn’t have a growing population. ​ Yes... ​ no society could survive in the long run if it didn’t have a growing population. ​ ​ But these days, we're below replacement rates. Why could that be, I wonder.
/r/MensRights22/08/18 02:14 AM
2

You have argued consistently in favor of his guilt. Young men contemplating how to behave now, with an eye to the situation thirty years down the track, should take careful note.
/r/MensRights20/08/18 02:07 PM
1

Now lets suppose it was 30 years ago, and in that time the person has gone from obscurity to fame. Lots of people knew him, some well, some not so well; and some knowing him not so well would like to have known him better for name-dropping purposes. Suppose further that it had become fashionable to accuse such people of theft; and anyone who did could expect benefits like sympathy, notoriety, a faint shadow of his fame by reflection, and so on. And let's suppose further (taking it too too far, I…
/r/MensRights20/08/18 12:29 PM
1

So you are saying it's highly likely that he's guilty?
/r/MensRights20/08/18 10:21 AM
2

it bolsters the gender binary, maintaining the idea that men and women are distinctly different,” Mycek contends, declaring that “this is not just about maintaining difference between genders but ultimately [retaining] a gender hierarchy and structures of power and inequality.” And all I needed to get there was to eat lettuce? If only I'd read her earlier...
/r/MensRights20/08/18 08:05 AM
1

This may help. https://qz.com/980766/the-truth-about-false-rape-accusations/ I don't think it does. Try this one as an alternative: https://www.theguardian.com/culture/2018/aug/19/kevin-spacey-film-flops-us-box-office-billionaire-boys-club Kevin Spacey’s latest film has tanked at the box office after taking in a record-breaking low of just $126 (£98) on its opening night in US cinemas. Billionaire Boys Club was the last film the actor made before sexual assault allegations dating back more than …
/r/MensRights20/08/18 07:32 AM
8

"Lashing is a hard, physical job, therefore you didn't get many women," Edwards said. But you didn't need to have done it to be trained to drive a straddle. "They are completely different jobs," Edwards said. I wonder if they have completely different pay rates.
/r/MensRights20/08/18 06:37 AM
1

aggriculture aggroculture FTFY
/r/MensRights20/08/18 02:13 AM
1

Don't know. But defendants will sure have a reason to press for these things. As to technical feasibility, look at what it is doing. Conversations are being passed onto a powerful networked computing system. The possibilities are endless.
/r/MensRights18/08/18 08:53 PM
1

A possible source of evidence in rape accusations. This aspect is not disturbing, it is encouraging, IMO. We need to get habituated to the possibility that your inventions could realistically be fact checked.
/r/MensRights18/08/18 08:22 PM
3

Few men are willing to take responsibility for their actions Like you wouldn't, if your advice turns out wrong.
/r/MensRights14/08/18 10:49 PM
2

You could define "equivalent" as "having the same wage", as determined by a free market. That is, the wage determines the equivalence, that way round. Then any argument would be about what a free market is; that's relatively objective. Or you could define equivalence according to what you think is right. That's pretty subjective.
/r/MensRights14/08/18 02:50 PM
2

despite all the perks, women dont seem to both get into, and stick to, said STEM, that much. I think that most of them aren't all that interested. The ones that are, a minority, tend to stay.
/r/MensRights14/08/18 02:37 PM
2

equivalent jobs The fact that they attract different wages means they can't be equivalent. What stops a nurse from getting a job as a plumber and getting a higher wage? When women look at what they would like to do, are they more attracted to nursing or plumbing, or is it all just work?
/r/MensRights14/08/18 12:11 PM
3

why the huge push for women in STEM? I've often wondered about this myself. Maybe because it's seen as well paid, safe, physically undemanding, and a growth area. And maybe because big employers in the area are looking for large supplies of workers (and therefore lower wages) and see women as an untapped resource. translation: this work is way harder than i can cope with and want an easy job instead). STEM is hard as fuck, It is. But I suspect that "caring" jobs are hard too. All work is harder …
/r/MensRights14/08/18 11:53 AM
5

Come on, it's not all that bad. For example, there's this item which celebrates the true awesomeness of women: http://reductress.com/post/inspiring-this-woman-did-so-many-squats-she-grew-a-second-butt/ Inspiring! This Woman Did So Many Squats She Grew a Second Butt In an astounding turn of events that can only be seen as a medical miracle, 28-year-old June Karkaran did so many squats that her butt actually began to grow a second butt. “Right before the summer started, I made a plan to do at leas…
/r/MensRights12/08/18 06:47 AM
5

https://www.biorxiv.org/content/early/2018/06/07/339465
/r/MensRights10/08/18 06:47 PM
3

Yep, "stale".
/r/MensRights10/08/18 06:32 PM
3

Is there a less extreme r/MensRights Try r/feminism
/r/MensRights07/08/18 07:02 AM
1

but still wonder what else they may have known This is the common bias; just happens to be always again the man. We can't be too careful, you know what bastards they all are... In another report on the incident, https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-45004290 it mentions what he had to say: The ECRC was issued with details of the rape charge and not guilty verdict. The man objected to the information being included, arguing he had not been convicted and that it failed to give a full account of the eviden…
/r/MensRights07/08/18 12:36 AM
2

You've left class out of the picture. Somewhere I read that the most disadvantaged group in the UK was white working class boys. Is there something in that?
/r/MensRights06/08/18 11:49 PM
3

Nope Yeah, it must be next to impossible to make yourself look any more ridiculous than you already have. We'll just have to wait for the Queen to chair the next meeting of the Central Committee to see how things come out.
/r/MensRights04/08/18 08:55 PM
3

The U.K. is a hardcore communist nation LOL. Troll harder.
/r/MensRights04/08/18 08:35 PM
1

https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/94avb2/this_poll_having_no_no_option/e3jzfas/
/r/MensRights04/08/18 03:15 AM
0

https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/94avb2/this_poll_having_no_no_option/e3jzfas/
/r/MensRights04/08/18 03:14 AM
1

https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/94avb2/this_poll_having_no_no_option/e3jzfas/
/r/MensRights04/08/18 03:13 AM
1

Why not both? There's no variation by sex - both are female.
/r/MensRights03/08/18 08:31 PM
1

Yeah, I've seen the same sort of thing. I think it's all about the monetization of attention. Clicks are valuable these days and there's a premium on anything controversial.
/r/MensRights03/08/18 08:26 PM
6

Is it the anti-mensrights sub trolling Looks to me to be something along those lines. As the sub grows bigger it becomes more attractive for those seeking to harness its energies for their own purposes. Parasites, basically.
/r/MensRights03/08/18 08:12 PM
2

https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/94avb2/this_poll_having_no_no_option/e3jzfas/
/r/MensRights03/08/18 07:47 PM
74

it's really just a stupid poll from a first-year student at the school I attend. Not a true study, done by a professional https://old.reddit.com/r/assholedesign/comments/949wrs/this_poll_having_no_no_option/e3js5w3/ This link leads to a closed Surveymonkey page: https://imgur.com/u8eqtwq
/r/MensRights03/08/18 07:40 PM
3

Brochu became infamous after writing an Instagram post where she admitted to doing a stealthy attack on her roommate. She wrote: "Finally did it yo girl got rid of her roommate!! After 1 1/2 month of spitting in her coconut oil, putting moldy clam dip in her lotions, rubbing used tampons [on] her backpack, putting her toothbrush places where the sun doesn’t shine and so much more I can finally say goodbye Jamaican Barbie." Sounds racist to me.
/r/MensRights03/08/18 11:28 AM
2

Now you mention it, no, I'm not sure. Just going on the feelz, I'd guess that the white guy would get treated harsher maybe. Which would indicate an interaction between sex and race, or "intersectionality" as the feminists say.
/r/MensRights03/08/18 11:20 AM
17

Nah. Both participants were female. Girls being beastly to girls. No need to concern us [Holds nose, ascends to higher plane]
/r/MensRights03/08/18 04:55 AM
-2

This is a race issue, not a sexism issue.
/r/MensRights03/08/18 03:50 AM
2

Lol wut? Marie Curie was a woman It's sarcasm, Amaretto. Let me guess, you're from the USA, right?
/r/MensRights30/07/18 11:52 PM
2

When people (almost always men) explain the product design methods in my own book to me, Odd. I've spent my entire life without ever once having product design methods come up in a conversation. Yet it seems to happen to this person all the time. Why? in my own book That's probably why. My guess: she insinuates it into the conversation all the time so that she can then say I’m well-acquainted with them, ... thus establishing a fact that nobody asked for. But you don't want to be too obvious abou…
/r/MensRights30/07/18 11:38 PM
3

We approach the Poe Horizon.
/r/MensRights29/07/18 03:05 AM
1

Honestly, she could have picked a better looking message cookie. I mean, the colors... basically congealed vomit, and I ask you ... green roses??? Here's a much more appropriate one, with giant sperms: https://imgur.com/gallery/qpJNE Just here to help!
/r/MensRights29/07/18 02:33 AM
-1

It's the latest from the troll factory.
/r/MensRights29/07/18 02:21 AM
-1

Trolling.
/r/MensRights29/07/18 02:17 AM
-1

What does this have to do with men's rights? You answered your own question: Divorces suck for us, Also are we now going to be anti-marriage in general because marriages themselves suck or are difficult? Why not? Suckfulness and difficulty seem to me to be good reasons to be against it.
/r/MensRights28/07/18 07:08 PM
4

Do you have an answer to his question? If not, why reply?
/r/MensRights28/07/18 06:51 PM
1

They are both about unbelievable defenses.
/r/MensRights28/07/18 05:00 AM
1

op says this is a sexist bill do you agree? Yes. The wording is gender neutral, but (in my opinion) the intention is that it will apply only to women, and that is how it will be applied. There may be some very rare male DV applicants, used to prove that it's not gender biased, but they will be in a minority. I'm saying that the gender neutrality is a hypocrisy, which is generally ignored in polite society.
/r/MensRights28/07/18 04:57 AM
1

You’re looking at someone who acknowledges women are the main victims of domestic abuse and lumping them together with people who want 100% equality in every field. That's a valid point. But what are the facts? 100% equality in DV? The extent is arguable. What "everybody knows" may not be true. this was a bad bill. So you disagree? It's a bad bill. I expect it to lead to an increase in the DV statistics for NZ.
/r/MensRights27/07/18 01:41 PM
1

The reasoning seems to be: it's in the employment contract, use it or lose it; they're just following the rules, as agreed. If you challenge that by saying inventing "sickies" is dishonest, the reply usually is: if the tables were turned the employer would do it too (that is, go back on the agreement if they could get away with it.) Which, in my experience, does happen.
/r/MensRights27/07/18 01:02 PM
1

it seems so common sense Then why go to the trouble of all the in-your-face gender neutrality? It's woman preference, elephant in the room style.
/r/MensRights27/07/18 12:49 PM
-8

Compare and contrast: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3361640/Saudi-millionaire-cleared-raping-teenager-telling-court-accidentally-penetrated-18-year-old-tripped-fell-her.html said he might have fallen on top of the teenager while his penis was poking out the top of his underwear. He got off, too.
/r/MensRights27/07/18 12:44 PM
2

Even I say “her” because women are the most affected Yes, that's what makes it a men's issue. Women will the the majority of the users of this law, everyone knows that; which means that men will be in the minority, by comparison. Although everyone knows that too, few will talk about it.
/r/MensRights27/07/18 12:30 PM
1

do you think people will use this to the same extent My opinion: of course they will. It will be seen by those people as an entitlement. And how is this a men’s issue when the paper doesn’t mention sex and the law doesn’t either? The bill has gender neutral wording, but everybody knows how it will be applied. The bill's author, Jan Logie, let it slip in a radio interview: https://www.radionz.co.nz/audio/player?audio_id=2018655200 At 1:31 she says Too many businesses just don't know how to respon…
/r/MensRights27/07/18 12:11 PM
2

Here's a post from an actual employer: https://old.reddit.com/r/newzealand/comments/92666e/international_applause_as_new_zealand_approves/e33u4kq/ Note where he writes I've hired a fair number of people over that time. The employment contract says everybody gets five days sick leave per year. Some people use hardly any sick leave. For those people, in theory I could not bother keeping track of how much sick leave they have, for all the difference it would make, they'd never use it all. Other peo…
/r/MensRights27/07/18 11:48 AM
5

It depends on the size of the organization, but small employers could be particularly damaged by having to find 10 day's pay, per year, per affected employee. The money comes from the employer, not the government.
/r/MensRights27/07/18 05:43 AM
2

Your reaction, not unexpected, is a good illustration of my point. Ok bye Bye!
/r/MensRights27/07/18 05:38 AM
5

One problem is that it's a charge on employers. It depends on the size of the organization, but coming up with 10 day's pay a year per aggrieved employee could hurt small employers. The opposition party made this objection, arguing that the money should come from the Government; but were overruled.
/r/MensRights27/07/18 05:30 AM
5

Robbing banks is an option to get money, but most people are morally sound and don’t, The ones who do, however, cause serious damage.
/r/MensRights27/07/18 05:26 AM
3

I guess then that your prediction is no change in the NZ DV statistics in the future. My prediction is that we will see an increase. NZ already has the worst DV statistics in the OECD, and that's after thirty years or so of the women's refuge movement. Cue the usual "correlation versus causation" trope; but it makes you think, no? Me anyway. We will have to wait and see.
/r/MensRights27/07/18 05:14 AM
2

There’s no undercurrent of sex. Naif. How is this an amazing reward Special treatment is the reward. Special snowflakes need it good. You heard of sick days? Most of them aren’t used even though you don’t need to prove you are actually sick She would be giving up a chance to support the sisterhood and draw attention to the cause. Reprehensible, wouldn't you say? call me a feminist OH NO! Even I wouldn't do that.
/r/MensRights27/07/18 05:09 AM
3

It doesn’t even mention sex in this so why is it here? There's always an undercurrent of sex. most of us aren’t running around abusing or breaking laws are we? Depends on the expected penalty: Domestic violence victims [undercurrent] do not have to provide proof of their circumstances, ... and the reward ... entitled to fast-tracked flexible work conditions designed to ensure their safety, such as changing their work location, changing their email address and having their contact details removed…
/r/MensRights27/07/18 03:54 AM
28

New Zealand has one of the highest rates of domestic violence in the developed world, with police responding to a family violence incident every four minutes. My prediction is that this law will lead to an increase in the NZ DV numbers: Domestic violence victims do not have to provide proof of their circumstances, and will also be entitled to fast-tracked flexible work conditions designed to ensure their safety, such as changing their work location, changing their email address and having their …
/r/MensRights26/07/18 10:14 PM
3

The bill has gender neutral wording, but we all know how it will be applied. The bill's author, Jan Logie, let it slip in a radio interview: https://www.radionz.co.nz/audio/player?audio_id=2018655200 At 1:31 she says Too many businesses just don't know how to respond. They either don't see it and they lose great staff, or they just lose the productivity because everyone else in the workplace is kinda trying, spending all this time trying to work out: how do they keep her safe, and not having the…
/r/MensRights26/07/18 04:48 AM
1

No idea. It's just general information on how to see if you're shadowbanned.
/r/MensRights24/07/18 11:42 PM
1

Log out and see if you can still see your own comments.
/r/MensRights24/07/18 11:07 AM
2

According to the description in Wikipedia, The clitoris contains external and internal components. From what you have said, FGM must stop short of cutting out the entire clitoris. So just what is FGM? Where does the excision stop? We hear that there are different forms of it. ignorance of female anatomy is rife among men’s rights activists That's irrelevant to the question of circumcision though. It becomes relevant only if you want to minimize the damage by contrasting it with FGM; we see a lot…
/r/MensRights24/07/18 05:13 AM
1

FGM is so much worse and it is anatomically equivalent to cutting off the entire external penis To be clear then, are you saying that FGM involves an internal excision?
/r/MensRights24/07/18 04:23 AM
1

FYI the clitoris is as important to sexual response as the ENTIRE PENIS Why come to this sub in particular to say this? I suspect because of the many discussions here about circumcision. In those discussions, there are usually comparisons to FGM, and usually we hear something like "FGM is so much worse - it's equivalent to cutting off the entire penis. Can the OP, with all their [note politically correct gender reference] medical expertise, comment on this comparison?
/r/MensRights24/07/18 02:47 AM
8

The usual one-way sexism, getting worked up over an all-male cast (we all hear about that) but ignoring a similar all-woman cast. Auckland actor Rosie Cann, 22, said she believed the tradition of men playing female roles was outdated and should fall by the wayside. She said last year some women reversed the convention and had an all-female cast put on a Shakespeare play. They called themselves the Lord Lackbeards and their lead actor was six months pregnant. "Which was so amazing. So much more i…
/r/MensRights23/07/18 06:34 PM
5

Would this be the case if it was a man that had escaped EM? No, apparently the man would be let off: Kentreal Brisco allegedly had a 27-year-old man’s stolen cell phone with him and he was demanding $500 cash to give it back when cops reported finding Brisco's electronic monitoring device plugged into the car outlet. Briscoe received the sort of justice we’re more accustomed to seeing from Cook County: All charges were dropped at his next court hearing.
/r/MensRights23/07/18 05:41 AM
1

Dunno, you're the expert.
/r/MensRights23/07/18 05:29 AM
1

Just smile at women You wouldn't be advocating stare rape, would you? ignore the ones Ignore? That might be a form of rape too, not sure about that, not being right up to date with the latest definition. At least a sexual oppression though. I’m sorry I can’t help you. OK
/r/MensRights23/07/18 05:01 AM
1

Pretty sure that the incels themselves came up with the term, bro, You seem to know a lot about it. An incel yourself, then?
/r/MensRights23/07/18 04:47 AM
6

they don't care It's more than that. People go looking for reasons to justify it. All sorts of different reasons. They are actively, determinedly avoiding the elephant.
/r/MensRights23/07/18 12:59 AM
2

Four years old. he described himself as a "red pill." Those were the words, back then, when you needed something for your "horrifying story." At the time, I was unfamiliar with the vernacular. After he said it, I went to the bathroom and Googled it. The bathroom? Oh, well. I came up with hits for The Red Pill sub Reddit and read a few posts. I found out that "red pill" is MRA-speak for men who have seen the truth of devious female ways. Well, that's rubbish, but what I noticed was what her bathr…
/r/MensRights23/07/18 12:49 AM
1

I've never been to your sr. You sure about that?
/r/MensRights21/07/18 07:55 AM
3

meaningful If the "meaning" is just that us lads is hard done by, then that doesn't get anywhere. "Meaningful" implies a rational plan of action. What do we want, a rational plan of action; when do we want it, now. The trouble is, we don't have a plan, and any attempt to make one gets lost in human gender kneejerking.
/r/MensRights21/07/18 03:59 AM
7

That's because a protest from women gets more sympathy, more results. That's the way we are; they supplicate, we swell with pride and deliver (or die in the process). Karen's point, basically.
/r/MensRights21/07/18 03:50 AM
1

With a lot of medical care and treatment and support I don’t think she poses a risk to the public or her children,” Sabir said in May. Going to let her babysit your kids then?
/r/MensRights20/07/18 02:34 AM
6

John apologized and said he would keep their relationship professional. That fall, he asked the instructor to recommend YouTube videos that could help him improve his dance technique. She suggested he take private lessons, but that she did not teach private lessons. For the next week, the instructor avoided John during her classes. On October 14, 2016, John gave the instructor a three-page letter “apologizing for being awkward around her, expressing sincere feelings for her, and asking [her] wha…
/r/MensRights20/07/18 02:25 AM
5

> Racism isn't a MRA issue It's a feminist issue though. They assert an interaction between racism and sexism; at least, that's how I understand "intersectionality". Is there something in it? Is a black man generally held to look much more likely to commit sexual assault than just a man (race unspecified)? This is suitable material for an MRA issue, in my opinion.
/r/MensRights20/07/18 02:21 AM
2

OP added that information after being given it by another user, His explanation did appear after someone had posted the link to the Lullaby Lounge website, yes. A shame he didn't check before he posted, yes? Being a local and all. The actual state of affairs being revealed, bit by bit, by the sensible people, after a lot of angst from those, poor, pathetic Men's Righters. Showing themselves up yet again. Crybabies, really. If only they had checked their facts before rushing in! But what can you …
/r/MensRights18/07/18 02:42 AM
-14

And you see nothing wrong with that at all? With what? If you're referring to Lullaby Lounge A place for mommies and babies then that's wrong, because it appears to exclude fathers with babies. Until, that is, we learn that the OP knew all along that there was a space in there for breastfeeding along with other stuff, that he didn't mention at the time of making the post. That's trolling, or, more specifically, setting the scene for other trolls to come along later. Tedious, moronic trolls. Trol…
/r/MensRights17/07/18 08:02 AM
-26

Can you read? I thought I could. What I read was: Lullaby Lounge A place for mommies and babies. Did I miss something? He said there was a room inside the general area for breastfeeding specifically. Yeah, in a comment made well after the troll attempt was underway.
/r/MensRights17/07/18 06:36 AM
-9

You: just going off the sign Also you: there is a breast feeding room in there but that is not what its entire purpose is.
/r/MensRights17/07/18 04:53 AM
-51

Ah, so you did know the actual situation. Troll confirmed.
/r/MensRights17/07/18 04:51 AM
3

the big and little sperm? Could be!
/r/MensRights17/07/18 04:46 AM
10

The point is, the sign doesn't say "families". In fact, it says "mommies".
/r/MensRights17/07/18 04:35 AM
46

The Lullaby Lounge lounge includes a tv lounge area with comfortable couches, a family bathroom complete with a pint-sized potty for the little ones, changing tables, and a private nursing room. Great. What a pity their sign doesn't say it's for families. I wonder why? The extra lettering can't be all that expensive.
/r/MensRights17/07/18 04:14 AM
1

I don't see anything wrong or sexist about this? It looks like a breastfeeding/diaper changing lounge in a mall. Question is, is it or not. Penalty for getting it wrong!
/r/MensRights17/07/18 03:40 AM
5

this retarded nonsense this moronic trolling, more like.
/r/MensRights17/07/18 03:21 AM
6

Yes you are dumb fuck There's probably a penalty for getting it wrong.
/r/MensRights17/07/18 03:18 AM
-38

A troll, then?
/r/MensRights17/07/18 03:16 AM
5

It would be too easy if they actually wrote that though. Maybe you could try to decode the logo.
/r/MensRights17/07/18 03:11 AM
1

Whose Madeline Albright? Whose? Everybody's. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RM0uvgHKZe8
/r/MensRights15/07/18 08:07 AM
2

complimenting them. Don't do that, it's a bad strategy. When you feel a compliment coming on, close your eyes and think of Madeline Albright.
/r/MensRights15/07/18 02:23 AM
9

She went into a long rant on how only 2% of all rape accusations are false (I find that number a little weird) and how men are pathetic for worrying about something that rarely happens. She completely forgets about the severity of the consequence. You need to take that into account, as well as the rarity or otherwise of the event; think insurance for rare events like your house burning down. My whole thing to it is why? Why do they regard a legitimate fear men have as nothing but nonsense? Becau…
/r/MensRights15/07/18 02:14 AM
5

Cavill since apologized for the backlash to his comments through a rep to The Hollywood Reporter, “Insensitivity was absolutely not my intention. In light of this I would just like to clarify and confirm to all that I have always and will continue to hold women in the highest of regard, no matter the type of relationship whether it be friendship, professional, or a significant other,” the statement read. “Never would I intend to disrespect in any way, shape or form.” Readers of true understandin…
/r/MensRights13/07/18 04:58 AM
16

First half of the report: jail sentence for false accusation of rape. Rest of the report: a propaganda opportunity for how very very rare it all is (extensive research shows that false reporting is much lower for rape than for any other offence) and discounting of the victim and replacing him with others (False allegations of rape have the potential to cast doubt on the credibility of victims’ claims and further deter them from coming forward. We offer an independent service and victims can come…
/r/MensRights10/07/18 05:44 PM
9

Women should no longer be sent to prison unless they have committed a serious crime, the Justice Secretary says today It's the age of equality! How about Men should no longer be sent to prison unless they have committed a serious crime, the Justice Secretary says today It would save money. A lot more than it would doing it for women.
/r/MensRights27/06/18 02:15 AM
2

https://www.nation.co.ke/news/Male-teachers-no-longer-at-ease-in-girls-schools/1056-4627996-12wcn86/index.html
/r/MensRights26/06/18 10:34 AM
5

You've got to admire their inventiveness. Now it's the wi-fi speakers that's raping them. Standard domestic violence photo. We don't need to read the caption, she's sitting in the standard domestic violence pose, albeit on a carpet instead of a concrete floor Their stories are part of a new Not new; same old. pattern of behavior in domestic abuse cases tied to the rise of smart home technology. Internet-connected locks, speakers, thermostats, lights and cameras that have been marketed as the new…
/r/MensRights26/06/18 08:02 AM
6

At last, the gold standard definition of a feminist. I’m a feminist through and through, Is this an expert opinion? Some guy at The Atlantic is going to mansplain me the principles of feminism? A feminist professor of 30-plus years, who has written four books? I mean, seriously? It’s the ultimate in hubris. I guess it must be. Like some awful chrysalis, cocooned in a protective sheath for 30 years, finally unveiled! ... and this is what crawls out.
/r/MensRights24/06/18 04:55 AM
5

Galloway ... is one of the few first-tier novelists that his country has ever produced. His 2008 novel, The Cellist of Sarajevo, was an international bestseller, listed for numerous literary prizes. Sounds like he's the real deal. What then is the connection between a real novelist and a Department of Creative Writing... “In a power situation where somebody has power over your career, your advancement, your grades, you may say you consent because of the power situation.” The grist for that mill …
/r/MensRights23/06/18 06:39 AM
3

people hate to admit it. Also, it's less visible because modern society has insulated us from reality somewhat.
/r/MensRights23/06/18 12:54 AM
8

"these two smart young women take on the world, with their signature satirical voice while deconstructing popular culture, social classes, gender and race." Oh, just can't wait.
/r/MensRights22/06/18 06:07 AM
5

Victoria! Victoria! It's the Victorians!
/r/MensRights22/06/18 05:59 AM
6

What an explosion of disapprobation. The same social force that enabled her sanctimonious cuntishness in the first place is now turned against her. Let's hope that closing the feedback loop doesn't result in instability.
/r/MensRights21/06/18 02:59 AM
7

it's going to separate the legitimate cases out from the bullshit cases. That would be nice, but it doesn't sound like that to me: Ms Jenkins said the inquiry would follow on from the MeToo movement, which helped shine a light on the prevalence of women being sexually harassed and assaulted. That sounds more like an acceptance of the MeToo movement, not an investigation into it. Ms Jenkins said the investigation was about turning the discussion into action and would help make Australian workplac…
/r/MensRights20/06/18 04:46 AM
1

Do you believe it’s possible to be sexist against men? No, I really don’t. Sexism is about the institutionalized and interpersonal treatment of women and people perceived to be women. Again, look at the world. Where is discrimination? Where are men being excluded? Where are men being abused? Oh, come on. Do you think some men who are near the center of the political spectrum might see op-eds like yours and move further to the right as a result? It does seem like, in your ideal world, the left mi…
/r/MensRights20/06/18 03:58 AM
1

This month in The Washington Post, Suzanna Danuta Walters published an op-ed called "Why Can’t We Hate Men?" Walters is a professor of sociology and director of the Women’s, Gender, and Sexuality Studies Program at Northeastern University, and also editor of the gender-studies journal Signs. Her op-ed has generated thousands of comments; drawn dismay, outrage, or ridicule in other publications and blogs; and spurred homophobic death and rape threats. In her op-ed, Walters writes that even before…
/r/MensRights20/06/18 03:55 AM
1

I put some part of the article down below (maybe too much? first time posting here). Since it's paywalled, you could usefully put all of it here. I presume it's a mass of self justification, but it's always good to go to the source.
/r/MensRights20/06/18 03:23 AM
1

Try Urban Dictionary for a different view.
/r/MensRights20/06/18 02:47 AM
1

Software development is not a difficult or stressful job. Oh. I guess because we can all copy and paste from Stackoverflow... easy stuff really. Here's a classic from Stackoverflow. Do you have anything to say about it? https://stackoverflow.com/questions/1732348/regex-match-open-tags-except-xhtml-self-contained-tags
/r/MensRights19/06/18 11:23 PM
8

All but one of the programs cited in her notes had been prepared by Babbage from three to seven years earlier. The exception was prepared by Babbage for her, although she did detect a 'bug' in it. Ah, not the first computer programmer, but the first computer program debugger. More difficult than writing them, any practitioner will admit.
/r/MensRights19/06/18 10:58 AM
2

https://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radio/2018/jun/18/david-dimbleby-question-time-host-a-look-at-the-candidates
/r/MensRights19/06/18 10:38 AM
2

I gave the heritage in the thread. There's the Daily Mail, and then there's the Henley Standard, which is not a major news outlet, but it is approximately in the vicinity of Sonning Common. I'm guessing they know what they're talking about. http://www.henleystandard.co.uk/news/chiltern-edge/126468/boys-can-wear-skirts-to-school-but-not-shorts.html Their report contains many details not in those other publications - and I agree those others are all copying from the same source - and their (Henley…
/r/MensRights19/06/18 04:12 AM
1

the boys start manspreading in their skirts LOL. A cunning feminist plot for more MeToo opportunities.
/r/MensRights18/06/18 06:27 AM
2

The news item has been reported on a number of sites. It's unlikely they are all fake news..
/r/MensRights18/06/18 06:19 AM
12

[With smugness]: Molly, the reason you got less than Thomas... ... Is because you are a girl. The narrator should be ashamed of herself. No wonder Norway is such a cesspit of inequality, when they make such trade union funded propaganda videos to instill the inequity standards into the minds of the young.
/r/MensRights16/06/18 11:11 AM
17

She got 15 years. https://www.news-leader.com/story/news/crime/2018/04/09/springfield-woman-whose-friends-killed-her-behalf-gets-prison-time/497506002/
/r/MensRights15/06/18 04:47 AM
2

it's skewed to be a male burden by design. So, it's a burden, not a privilege. War is a burden almost entirely designed and executed by men on other men though. That's still a burden, not a privilege.
/r/MensRights14/06/18 07:44 AM
7

Pressure to earn a lot contributes to that.
/r/MensRights14/06/18 05:26 AM
1

https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/8qtgwe/male_privilege/e0mw7id/
/r/MensRights14/06/18 05:22 AM
2

That's not what male privilege is You appear to be using "male privilege" in a technical (feminist-defined) sense. The OP's list just points out how different that is to ordinary speech. Take the first item as an example, the overwhelming death rate in battle. This, in ordinary speech, is a burden on males, not a privilege.
/r/MensRights14/06/18 05:01 AM
4

I do worry about that, because I think when a woman makes an accusation, the man instantly gets the death penalty. There has to be some sort of due process here OK... but what sort of due process could there be? These accusations come out of the world of gossip, storytelling, "journalism". "Due process" comes from the world of official procedures. One possibility is to make slander into a serious a hair-trigger affair where the accuser "gets the death penalty", to use Gayle King's cheery aphoris…
/r/MensRights14/06/18 02:28 AM
7

It doesn't disprove the idea of male privilege or even seem that related. If they were truly privileged, they would be getting the rewards without having to run the risks. That's how it's related.
/r/MensRights14/06/18 02:17 AM
7

See https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/8qtgwe/male_privilege/e0mw7id
/r/MensRights14/06/18 02:12 AM
4

This right here is where r/mensrights breaks down. Wrong, wrong, wrong. This is where it shines. See this comment from -quenton- https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/8qtgwe/male_privilege/e0mw7id -quenton- was sufficiently motivated to put in the work of tracking down the sources, rather than uselessly complaining. Only in mensRights!
/r/MensRights14/06/18 02:10 AM
14

her and her friend thought they won Probably their belief in their story was so strong that they heard what you said and interpreted it as the direct opposite.
/r/MensRights14/06/18 01:50 AM
7

As women’s roles expand, society’s need for men in their traditional roles as protector, provider and parent is shrinking. Nope. The perception of the need for men is shrinking, but the need remains. Society is so complicated now that great chunks of it are not easily visible and are taken for granted: the light has always come on when I press this switch, so it always will. The blindness to reality extends to women's roles too: they may be expanding in number, but no one notices how their one e…
/r/MensRights13/06/18 10:44 PM
3

women just need a space where they can discuss issues without some man interjecting facts into the discussion, it doesn't even matter if what is being discussed is true". All the women just nodded in agreement. Thus, the "Ladies Lie Club" where all sorts of defamation, slanders, and malicious gossip can be cooked up, to the general approval of all. "Me Too".
/r/MensRights13/06/18 10:01 PM
5

... and stickied. It can't be posted enough: another 5 times please. Why? Because sometimes, when you make the trivially true observation that feminists are a hateful bunch, you get asked for a cite, from a recognized feminist please, an academic please, not from an obscure source please, and not out of the ancient past please. And now we have it! Convenient and to hand. Lest we forget...
/r/MensRights13/06/18 10:50 AM
32

A missing part of your body Implying that it did in fact once exist.
/r/MensRights13/06/18 04:14 AM
3

The destructive effects of power without responsibility. These useless women and their irresponsible accusations were bad enough when it affected mainly the entertainment industries, but now it has leaked into areas we all depend on, including them. Things will get worse until they are stopped; they won't stop themselves.
/r/MensRights12/06/18 08:48 PM
4

This quote, from an interview earlier this year with Channel 4 News, pretty much sums up the myriad things we disagree upon: “Women get paid less than man, and it’s good that that’s the case. This is because men are inferior to women, and therefore we should make more money based on our superior intellect. In fact, I don’t think women should even work at all. They should stay home and make babies.” I saw that interview (who hasn't) but I don't remember him saying that. The author has just made s…
/r/MensRights12/06/18 06:34 AM
9

It's an ever present danger for parasites - eating too much and killing the host.
/r/MensRights12/06/18 04:36 AM
1

Due process acts as a brake on the power of the state. The meToo thing has given women power, but it is too new for the equivalent to due process to have come into existence. For that, you need untrammelled power without responsibility to lead to dire, disastrous consequences for everyone (which it will), affecting enough people to get us all to accept changing our ways.
/r/MensRights12/06/18 04:14 AM
11

The company added that positive reaction means they will be “looking into stocking similar options for Mother’s Day 2019”. Now I wonder what that means.
/r/MensRights12/06/18 12:36 AM
3

the dude asking for an explicit "Yes" then both actors stare in to the camera then afterwards climax in 2mins or less? Sort of like that, except no climax.
/r/MensRights12/06/18 12:32 AM
13

Sir Norman calls for a “clearer understanding” of when proceedings for gross negligence manslaughter should be brought in healthcare, so practitioners are reassured they would apply only in cases of “very poor performance” and not “honest mistakes”. The patients might not be as reassured as the practitioners . While accepting the findings, Mr Hunt has sought to reassure patients and their families that there will be improved scrutiny of deaths in the NHS, with the roll-out of a system of medical…
/r/MensRights11/06/18 06:37 AM
4

Urban Dictionary: Junior Anti-Sex League In George Orwell's novel 1984, an organization for young people that advocated complete celibacy for both sexes. The Party intends to abolish the institution of the family, so all children will be the products of artificial insemination and grow up in public institutions. Members wear red sashes around their waists. Julia, Winston Smith's lover, is a member of the Junior Anti-Sex League, though she does not share their ideals. Complete celibacy, eh. Could…
/r/MensRights11/06/18 06:12 AM
5

They are more likely than men to get help, support, bucks, and free stuff.
/r/MensRights11/06/18 05:14 AM
-2

It's "women are wonderful" in action. Oh, and "men are bastards" too, I guess.
/r/MensRights10/06/18 06:00 AM
8

If you are a good man with good intentions, you have nothing to worry about Heh
/r/MensRights10/06/18 05:56 AM
18

"Unwomen"? Doubleplusungood.
/r/MensRights10/06/18 01:03 AM
42

Why can’t we hate men? ... it seems logical to hate men ... We have every right to hate you. That's a feminist. Right out of her own mouth. Teaches hatred, publishes hatred, gets paid for it. So men, if you really are #WithUs What? Why would anyone want to get any closer to all that hatred? and would like us to not hate you Oh, go away.
/r/MensRights09/06/18 12:22 PM
3

It's a joke.
/r/MensRights07/06/18 09:31 PM
12

This is not an outtake from a bad men’s rights movie. Like it's wall to wall men’s rights movies. I called Karen Truszkowski, who represents the woman who says that Mumphery sexually assaulted her. Her client is not happy with the way the university handled the case, and she has sued Michigan State. Hmmm. Hasn't Michigan State been unfair enough? Apparently, it didn't support the complainant in the manner expected: http://www.espn.com/college-football/story/_/id/21583974/woman-files-title-ix-gen…
/r/MensRights01/06/18 02:59 AM
20

too white, male and middle class, says bike tsar The Tsar manages to be racist, sexist, and classist, all in one short sentence. Now that's economy! Bike tsar, oh dear. Bring back Ken!
/r/MensRights29/05/18 01:06 PM
8

There you are, on camera, with a demand put on you to say something amusing, or at least original, and a socially ingrained expectation of pro forma deference to women's beauty and general loveliness; but be careful what you say. Have the foresight to look years into the future when your every twitch and tick will be examined for evidence. Evidence of your guilt. Payout and cashing in time. Reminds me of Dr Tim Hunt, not a professional entertainer, in fact an expert on cell mitosis (boring stuff…
/r/MensRights29/05/18 12:42 AM
10

We have a lot of conflict in our work: trouble with mens' rights activists, pushback about recommendations. Now I need to know: what trouble?
/r/MensRights27/05/18 05:41 AM
2

8 page article Only 8 columns though.
/r/MensRights26/05/18 06:07 AM
1

Stockton businessman sentenced to 90 days of house arrest for raping child A surprisingly lenient sentence, for a male perpetrator, worth remarking on. Surprising, that is, until we learn that it's a plea deal, that bizarre totem of American justice, and that he's rich. Did he buy his way out of a stiffer sentence, or is he being sued for cash? Well, he is being sued for cash, by the parents, after the parents expressed outrage over the sentence. According to http://www.fresnobee.com/news/nation…
/r/MensRights26/05/18 04:24 AM
48

combine technology and robotics with dance and tai chi! They know that most girls wouldn't be interested, hence the inducement. Get into early child care with this camp especially for boys!!! We teach caring and empathy combined with gun instruction and shooting rabbits!!!
/r/MensRights26/05/18 12:10 AM
92

I can’t even begin to make sense of why someone would concoct such an awful story She probably didn't realize she was being recorded. To this very moment, Sherita Dixon-Cole still insists everything that she said happened…actually happened. I guess she's used to getting away with it. When all you've got is lies, what else can you do? Recovered memories, constructed memories, believe the victim, crap. Always be recording.
/r/MensRights25/05/18 02:02 AM
-1

It's a problem all right. There's no telling what happens to you when you're asleep. Who can tell, Donald Trump could come into your bedroom and do things, and you wouldn't know. One thing you can be certain of, though: because you're asleep, it's rape.
/r/MensRights24/05/18 10:02 PM
8

Neither Dr. Julia Shaw nor Dr. Jenni Bivona make that claim, according to the article. I guess Freud's maleness just blasts them into the shadows, eh.
/r/MensRights24/05/18 02:52 AM
1

Kāpiti councillor David Scott found guilty of indecent assault https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/crime/104129899/kpiti-councillor-david-scott-found-guilty-of-indecent-assault
/r/MensRights23/05/18 01:39 PM
3

Mr Scott said he had had some lumps removed from his face, which his specialist had said were cancer, and late in 2016 he also had lumps removed from his penis, although he now accepted they were not cancer. He said on the day the alleged indecent assault his penis was still feeling very sore to touch. Kapiti Coast district councillor David Scott, 71, is accused of rubbing his genitals against a member of council staff during a morning tea in April last year. He denies the charge. The complainan…
/r/MensRights23/05/18 05:08 AM
6

It seems that he had bits cut out of it. But he claimed he would not have touched her "down below" as two weeks before the alleged incident he had undergone surgery to remove cancer from his penis - a very painful process that included a complete circumcision, which left him in intense pain and a desire to avoid contact in that area "I definitely would not have touched anybody down below because I'm still having stitches taken out." There might be skullduggery in the background: David Scott said…
/r/MensRights23/05/18 05:02 AM
2

It's a short discussion from a few years back. Mike and Caroline have history: 7 June 2013: Caroline Criado-Perez - 'Lying Feminist of the Month' (three times) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GulYuojvoMw The discussion between them is from 16:09 to 35:05
/r/MensRights23/05/18 03:25 AM
16

a guerrilla group of women kidnaps and murders men who’ve been accused of crimes against women, ranging from institutionalized misogyny to violent sexual assault. But that’s just a subplot. The rest of the novel deals with toxic beauty standards, the weight-loss industry, a magazine called Daisy Chain, rape culture, feminist infighting, and the coming of age of a lonely, 300-pound writer named Plum. Yawn. Just the same old drone. They could do with something more creative. The past two decades h…
/r/MensRights23/05/18 02:25 AM
6

new screenplay software George, prophetic again: The versificator is a fictional device employed by Ingsoc in the novel Nineteen Eighty-Four by George Orwell. Its primary purpose is to act as a 'writing machine', a machine which produces both literature and music, its primary target audience being the proles.
/r/MensRights22/05/18 05:31 AM
5

a sleeveless shirt A "wife beater" you mean?
/r/MensRights21/05/18 01:44 AM
4

Relevant discussion on KotakuInAction: Why do hate subs (inceltears, justneckbeard, niceguys) appear on /r/all? https://archive.is/X42go
/r/MensRights20/05/18 11:54 AM
4

I am not sure how this is about men’s rights, false accusations in particular? Maybe it should have been flaired "Progress" instead.
/r/MensRights19/05/18 10:09 AM
5

Damien Walter Who? The most famous I've ever been, in the fluctuating sense of internet "fame", was when I was playing an internet strategy game in the late 90s. So, not very famous, then. But we've all got to make a buck. Even Damien Walter. any alt-right demagogue who can gather 1,000 whining, bitter, angry men with zero self-awareness now has a self-sustaining full time job as an online sh*tposter. That's a way of making bucks. Social media has been assailed by one toxic "movement" after anot…
/r/MensRights19/05/18 04:12 AM
18

Eye of newt, and toe of frog, Wool of bat, and tongue of dog, Adder's fork, and blind-worm's sting, And a little bit of baby foreskin Mix it up and shove it in your face, Sandra. It doesn't make you look any better.
/r/MensRights19/05/18 02:39 AM
1

https://issuu.com/metro_canada/docs/20160601_ca_vancouver Page 5
/r/MensRights18/05/18 02:40 AM
1

The text of the article was about homelessness in general.
/r/MensRights18/05/18 02:38 AM
3

this has been posted many, MANY times before. The picture has, yes. But not the article it was taken from: https://issuu.com/metro_canada/docs/20160601_ca_vancouver See page 5. It's not about periods and suchlike; it's about homelessness in Vancouver in general. Which is why the picture is so illustrative of societal bias.
/r/MensRights18/05/18 02:36 AM
1

Homelessness in Vancouver. https://issuu.com/metro_canada/docs/20160601_ca_vancouver See page 5.
/r/MensRights18/05/18 02:31 AM
1

No, it didn't mention tampons. It was about homelessness in general in Vancouver. https://issuu.com/metro_canada/docs/20160601_ca_vancouver (see page 5)
/r/MensRights18/05/18 02:30 AM
1

I think we have to continue to remove the gender from the discussion The Vancouver Metro's article is totally gendered. It's the whole point of the picture. You have to see that - and have it pointed out to you if you missed it - before you can even start to remove gender from the discussion. I know it's r/mensrights, but we still want equality right? Snide. So how to progress to equality then - which side of the inequality to address first? The smaller one?
/r/MensRights18/05/18 02:14 AM
8

It's known as satire. You can see it as such only if you have a wider view of the subject other than the one being satirized. Americans, in particular, often miss the point, suggesting a lack of informational variety in their society.
/r/MensRights18/05/18 01:50 AM
5

Except the rate of suicide for women is much higher. Wrong.
/r/MensRights18/05/18 01:44 AM
6

Link needed.
/r/MensRights17/05/18 10:51 AM
11

Google Translate: Actor Mayim Bialik is especially known for the role of Amy in the sitcom 'Big Bang Theory'. But she also has an education as a neurologist - and a somewhat unusual wall sculpture hanging at home. In itself, the wall sculpture with the small circular silver beads does not look so special, but it is their content, on the other hand. In the five little cups, there are pieces of Mayim Bialik's one-son's foster wax, placenta, umbilical cord and foreskin. It writes the American local…
/r/MensRights17/05/18 07:49 AM
7

http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/man-wrongfully-jailed-correction-officer-murder-exonerated-article-1.3991419
/r/MensRights17/05/18 04:01 AM
1

https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-8Q3L3W4aL9Y/V6aXZarJmoI/AAAAAAAAN5s/rpU22H-IlQIzq6RHlGSlh8iZQmazz6BkQCLcB/s1600/Herman%255BThanks2.jpg
/r/MensRights17/05/18 02:47 AM
3

It’s not as if she planted listening devices. Yes she did.
/r/MensRights17/05/18 01:57 AM
5

Could this be called gaslighting?
/r/MensRights16/05/18 06:10 PM
15

I don’t think a woman doing this would be treated any differently than a man. LOL
/r/MensRights16/05/18 05:58 PM
18

But are these women-only workplaces discriminatory? Don't know, but maybe they should be compulsory.
/r/MensRights16/05/18 05:42 PM
13

When anyone here recommends "Always Be Recording" we get lots of concerned warnings that it may be illegal, guys! Except when it's woman who's doing the recording. Then, it's probably not illegal, guys!
/r/MensRights16/05/18 05:28 PM
19

Granozio, who is married, later learned that a female co-worker had recorded their private conversation through a wall using her cell phone and sent the audio recording to HR. That's what we get from the "female co-worker". Her behavior was not admirable. What sane man would want any more of them around? He said: 'I support the MeToo movement. So, his mistake after all.
/r/MensRights16/05/18 05:22 PM
5

Some women, especially younger ones, are getting nervous. A recent poll by Vox and Morning Consult shows that roughly a third of women under 35 are “very concerned” that #MeToo will cause women to be denied professional opportunities by men who don’t want to work with them. Are these fears justified? This is a reassurance piece. There's no need to stop or moderate MeToo, girls! Fortunately, there is already plenty of proof that the #MeToo movement will end up being good for female jobseekers. In…
/r/MensRights16/05/18 08:21 AM
5

It's always concern-troll day.
/r/MensRights16/05/18 01:44 AM
1

pregnancy, childbirth, and the immeasurable needs of children put women, and children, in a vulnerable position. True That women have entered the marketplace in spades doesn't make this any less true. It makes the problem worse, because the more they are "in the marketplace", the less they are with their children. Modern conditions have created an economic pressure to push women into the workforce - that is a blind pressure. All the extra deliberate man-made (hah!) efforts we are seeing to push …
/r/MensRights16/05/18 01:40 AM
38

Mr Judd wiped away tears as Amanda Warren, 33, and Caris Underwood, 22, had their jail sentences quashed on appeal on Tuesday. “I just feel that justice hasn’t been done,” he said. Had the feel been expressed by a woman, then it would have mattered. But it wasn't, so it didn't. Warren and Underwood pleaded guilty to assaulting Mr Judd, a paramedic with more than 40 years experience, as he treated an unconscious man in 2016. Assaulting an emergency worker on a job. All right-thinking members of s…
/r/MensRights16/05/18 01:10 AM
1

Incel Men Whatever happened to bronies?
/r/MensRights15/05/18 10:46 AM
6

Consent can not been withdrawn retrospectively. That would seem reasonable. But if you really, really wanted a way to withdraw consent, how could you argue it? The argument seems to be "was it really consent? - no it wasn't." If you were frightened of possible bad consequences of not consenting, and so verbally gave consent but internally didn't want to, then it was coerced consent and therefore not actual consent. Note that this depends on the internal state of mind of the woman (in practice it…
/r/MensRights12/05/18 02:55 PM
1

Suspended sentence.
/r/MensRights12/05/18 12:47 PM
2

I never thought I'd say this, but good for Kimmel.
/r/MensRights12/05/18 11:25 AM
430

“Consent is straightforward. OK “You can’t consent if you're drunk, OK if you're underage OK or if there's consequences.” And what does that mean? Not so straightforward after all. One of the measures Ms Mecham suggested was introducing specialist courts to deal with cases of sexual assault and rape. Like that great success, the Family Courts, eh? I guess they would be held in secret, with "trained" judges. “Specialist courts would have comprehensive knowledge of perpetrator tactics so they can …
/r/MensRights12/05/18 08:14 AM
5

How about https://www.victoria.ac.nz/news/2014/research-shows-disparity-between-tax-paid-by-women-and-men Research from Victoria University of Wellington examining taxation and government welfare spending by age and gender in New Zealand shows that women pay less tax than men over their lifetime and receive more government assistance.
/r/MensRights12/05/18 02:23 AM
3

Ana Martínez-Alemán, associate dean of faculty and academics at Boston College’s Lynch School of Education and an expert on the impact of gender on learning, says that research suggesting that women learn differently from men is “highly contentious”. She's the expert. She also rejects the idea that the increasing enrolment of female students means that universities are “now pitching everything to women”. “The changes that we [have] seen probably since the late 1980s is the impact of feminist and…
/r/MensRights11/05/18 02:56 AM
1

The weaponization of narcissism.
/r/MensRights11/05/18 12:28 AM
3

Many people give the dictionary definition of sexism which goes like, “discrimination on the basis of one’s sex”. Well, why not use the dictionary definition then? After all, that's the meaning most people ascribe to the word. This simply implies that both men and women can be sexist towards each other. Yes. And that's the implication the feminists need to avoid. Or, to be more accurate, they want to avoid the part that implies that women can discriminate against men with deleterious effect. How…
/r/MensRights10/05/18 03:47 AM
4

It goes on: The obvious losers, however, are women. “If you have an extremely oppressive society, women have no control over their reproduction, so they are giving birth to child after child,” says Sarah Hrdy at the University of California at Davis. As a result, children are also, on average, worse off than if they were born into more egalitarian societies. Extreme patriarchies, says Hrdy, have higher maternal and infant mortality and worse child health. Unconscious bias The complex and pervasi…
/r/MensRights10/05/18 01:11 AM
6

Because a woman can get pregnant from it. In the past, this would severely threaten her life prospects, and have other social harms. These days, these severities are somewhat alleviated; but we still hold to an ingrained tradition (which may be instinctive, hence unremovable).
/r/MensRights08/05/18 08:51 PM
72

Robert Martin of Centre College in Kentucky, a co-author of the study, says the real reason for the growth in spending is that administrators want to hire subordinates, thereby boosting their own authority and often pay, rather than faculty, over whom they have less power. Yep Bureaucrats outnumber faculty 2:1 at public universities and 2.5:1 at private colleges, double the ratio in the 1970s. Diversity is the top justification for these hires, says Richard Vedder of the Centre for College Affor…
/r/MensRights08/05/18 12:22 PM
3

At 39:50, Harry says "if you walk out that door, everything you see has been built by a man". Cassie has referred to this in one of her descriptions of how she abandoned the label of "feminist". According to that, she is listening to Harry as a full-on feminist, and she is thinking "So? Everyone you see was birthed by a woman". A rare glimpse into what both participants were thinking at the time.
/r/MensRights08/05/18 11:51 AM
2

They want the non-stem stem jobs.
/r/MensRights08/05/18 10:17 AM
1

It's a health issue that affects men disproportionately - head and neck cancers from HPV.
/r/MensRights08/05/18 03:41 AM
4

What in the actual fuck does this have to do with mens rights? There's been a disturbing rise in head and neck cancers in men, attributed to the human papillomavirus. Oral sex is implicated in getting the infection.
/r/MensRights08/05/18 03:39 AM
19

Eventually, additional evidence and new interviews led the woman to admit that the rape "never happened." She recanted her testimony and said her boyfriend had pressured her to falsely accuse Perry and Counts, the district attorney's office said. The woman won't face charges because the statute of limitations has expired, the Associated Press reported. In this case at least, it wasn't her conscience that led her to admit that the rape "never happened." Nope, it was evidence. The lesson here is w…
/r/MensRights08/05/18 02:57 AM
0

clean Presumably this will include a certificate of freedom from HPV.
/r/MensRights08/05/18 02:37 AM
12

What a noisy lot. Answer the Big Questions by getting a bunch of loudmouths to shout over each other for an hour. And that presenter... feminists like me ... Dirty and Dangerous jobs? ... let's talk about the home instead (48:33) ... Domestic violence about equal ... let's move on (52:06) ... And most of them didn't seem to have heard of hypergamy; as ignorants, they should have shouted less and listened more. Mike did well, considering the toxic information environment.
/r/MensRights07/05/18 07:24 AM
6

we should NEVER discourage communication, especially about something as serious as rape. The poster is trying to communicate something about the *false accusation* of rape. Isn't that serious too? > "don't be that girl"? C'mon. What are you implying? That making a false accusation of rape is some sort of excusable peccadillo? It leads to the imprisonment of the innocent.
/r/MensRights07/05/18 12:43 AM
3

'Feminists aren't human.' They're all too human.
/r/MensRights06/05/18 08:58 PM
8

Is this true? I doubt it. We have to reckon with the existing doublethink about genital mutilation between the sexes. I expect the learned judges to come up with some legalism (= lie, but never mind) to justify the existing situation.
/r/MensRights06/05/18 04:54 AM
2

girl / pearl / twirl / churl
/r/MensRights04/05/18 12:06 PM
13

Nice little earner, eh. the department’s other course offerings, which include classes such as “Gender and Sex in Sci-Fi,” “Black Sexualities,” and “Food Justice.” I was intrigued by "Food Justice". Balancing the rights of pork pies against scotch eggs, maybe? Food and Food Justice How can we promote healthy, sustainable and equitable food systems? Leading the way for a more just future are women, poor people’s movements, and communities of color in the US and across the globe. In GWSS 500 “Food…
/r/MensRights04/05/18 11:57 AM
10

This very same article has been posted three times to MensRights over the years. To save everyone the effort of recycling replies to this recycled topic, here they are: From 3 years ago: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/2f5ci9/radicalicising_the_romanceless_great_takedown_of/ From 2 years ago: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/3bhe4e/feminist_bullying_of_nice_guys/ https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/44px59/radicalizing_the_romanceless_a_unexpected_but/ The last t…
/r/MensRights04/05/18 11:43 AM
11

Probably. Also, probably, if he is sexually active, then a rapist. Finally, all the bases covered!
/r/MensRights04/05/18 03:46 AM
7

You can read through that thread to see the raw mechanics of creating something from nothing.
/r/MensRights03/05/18 09:20 PM
1

only allows boys to join Isn't that illegal? Or it soon will be.
/r/MensRights03/05/18 09:14 PM
4

Looks like humans might be heading that way. They should take care not to eat anyone useful, like the pizza delivery guy for instance.
/r/MensRights03/05/18 08:55 PM
1

Agree. But then you get concern trolling. One of those difficult decisions, I guess.
/r/MensRights03/05/18 08:45 PM
1

this is just venting It's satire.
/r/MensRights03/05/18 07:54 PM
5

Six lifeboatmen gone... When a senior female member of staff found them at the headquarters in North Yorkshire, I guess it doesn't matter next time there's an emergency at sea in difficult conditions, provided the "senior members of staff" jump into the breach. They'll have to find six of them though. Or maybe the "senior female member of staff" could do it all herself, being a woman and all. An RNLI spokesman told the BBC: 'We are aware of speculation about the issue on social media but we want…
/r/MensRights03/05/18 09:24 AM
0

That's where a classical education gets you.
/r/MensRights02/05/18 12:19 PM
13

Another report from a site not behind a paywall: http://www.scottishlegal.com/2018/04/30/england-gp-falsely-accused-of-rape-by-serial-fantasist-not-entitled-to-reimbursement-of-legal-costs/ Dr Glascoe spent more than £100,000 on lawyers as well as expert witnesses. However, he will only be given £7,280 from the Legal Aid Board and absolutely no contribution to the cost of his barrister. The complainant was given £22,000 from the Criminal Injuries Compensation Authority after she contacted South …
/r/MensRights02/05/18 11:37 AM
7

And wives of men owned other men (slaves) too. Are we forgetting that men were slaves too? Should we even go down this rabbit hole? Yes; it's an effective argument. You can tell because... Every time we do, it completely derails the conversation, and everyone sitting at the table looks guilty and embarrassed. They realize they are wrong, and are trying to deal with the cognitive dissonance. Which is not the intended effect. Just wear it. You can't expect them to admit to having been wrong all th…
/r/MensRights01/05/18 06:07 PM
3

Hearing the actual thing she's talking about would be like reading the article before commenting. Take your own advice: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8bVxJAbCNYU
/r/MensRights01/05/18 09:06 AM
5

Feminists ... their influence stops at the campus border. JtO's point is that they're working, today, to inculcate the political class of tomorrow. You only have to look at how the craziness has leaked out of the campuses into the mainstream over the past few decades. If not enough people take JtO's advice about learning a trade, the electricity will fail by itself. That will screw them, true; but the rest of us as well.
/r/MensRights29/04/18 06:37 AM
8

When the majority in a society suddenly gets an overwhelming paternalistic urge to protect its minorities from their own practices, one should be suspicious. Iddo Porat wasn't suspicious enough to go into print when FGM was banned in Iceland; his suspicions are sexist, if I can still use that word in its original meaning. And why does he describe it as "paternalistic"? Apparently he doesn't realize the ban was put forward by a woman, Silja Dögg Gunnarsdóttir. In my opinion, he is simply using th…
/r/MensRights29/04/18 02:16 AM
110

He will, of course, be arrested.
/r/MensRights28/04/18 09:43 AM
8

That was back in 2016. And later... Charges dropped against Mustafa Ururyar, after sex assault conviction overturned https://www.thestar.com/news/crime/2017/12/13/charges-dropped-against-mustafa-ururyar-after-sex-assault-conviction-overturned.html
/r/MensRights28/04/18 02:49 AM
-3

Because I've actually read articles by the mainstream media about MRA's and noticed an obvious pattern? So how mainstream is 4chan, would you say?
/r/MensRights25/04/18 01:56 AM
4

It has already started. Yes, the prediction you made yesterday looks like it is coming true. In https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/8egq4t/cbc_reporting_that_toronto_mass_killer_was_incel/dxv6s2m/ you wrote I'll tell you what, give it a week and we'll see who was right and wrong: I anticipate that a bunch of media outlets will attempt to conflate incels with MRA's. Hopefully not everyone will be as passively accepting of this as you, and will challenge such propaganda. That's all I have…
/r/MensRights25/04/18 12:56 AM
-1

incels A relatively recently invented term. The use of the term focuses attention onto it, yes? Those groups are ridiculous That's right. So you, in "making it known", would be focusing attention onto something ridiculous. You would.
/r/MensRights24/04/18 04:34 AM
1

I anticipate that a bunch of media outlets will attempt to conflate incels with MRA's. You've been busy, I guess.
/r/MensRights24/04/18 03:11 AM
3

LOL
/r/MensRights24/04/18 02:59 AM
-2

You're a very odd character. I see, anyone who doesn't want to talk about "incels" all the time is "odd". Take your obsession elsewhere.
/r/MensRights24/04/18 02:54 AM
-4

the Elliot Rodgers affair Which you have just dredged up. Something about that "affair" fascinates you, eh.
/r/MensRights24/04/18 02:40 AM
-8

to suggest that people counter said disinformation when they encounter it in major news publications. You mean, talk up your pathetic creation and give it substance. What do you guys get out of it? A vicarious sense of faux superiority?
/r/MensRights24/04/18 02:22 AM
-5

Who are you, "Vwar", with your 15 day old account? It may be better to ignore it; Yes personally I think it should be challenged Of course you do.
/r/MensRights24/04/18 01:51 AM
-2

the "incel rebellion" Once again, the topic of "incels" is pushed. It has never been an idea of MRAs at all, so where does it come from? It is yet another attack on the MRA "movement", in my opinion. We should not assist that by talking it up. I wonder about the character of these guys who are so interested in the subject, a subject that I suspect they have created. What do they get out of it?
/r/MensRights24/04/18 01:36 AM
1

Sort of reminds me of feminist hairstyles.
/r/MensRights23/04/18 07:03 PM
1

I'm trying to come up with a snappy, cute term for tedious, tiresome, overlong and overblown magazine articles. There's a lot of it about lately. The manspreading of internet punditry? But then, if it was written by a woman, I dunno. KathrynVanArendonkSpreading maybe. Interminable TV episodes are the manspreading of television storytelling. In precisely the same way that a man sits down on a public row of seats and happily relaxes into a pose that takes up as much real estate as physically possi…
/r/MensRights23/04/18 10:28 AM
2

Why are so many people saying that women have never been oppressed? You are looking at only half of the picture. What we are saying is that, at any one time and place, women's "oppression" and men's "oppression" balance out, if you take into account the whole picture. The various "oppressions" are made up from individual advantages and disadvantages, and will be different over different historical and geographical areas; but they will always balance out, otherwise society will not work properly.…
/r/MensRights23/04/18 09:40 AM
4

cases of women leaving their husband. Historically, it was nearly impossible for women to do so Nope. See for instance http://www.womenintheancientworld.com/divorceinancientrome.htm
/r/MensRights23/04/18 08:36 AM
1

Don't they mean her anonymity? In this case the accuser was male, "Nick".
/r/MensRights23/04/18 02:22 AM
9

the idea police should assume they’re telling the truth invites dreadful injustice. It meant a distinguished public servant like Leon Brittan went to his grave thinking his reputation had been trashed by an individual who retains his anonymity... That's Leon Brittan, Baron Brittan of Spennithorne, PC, QC, DL, Conservative Member of Parliament, barrister, member of the European Commission, who served several ministerial roles in Margaret Thatcher's government, including Home Secretary. However, t…
/r/MensRights22/04/18 06:48 AM
5

if you sit like this dude You mean as in the thumbnail? That scene does not occur in the actual video. It is obviously posed for exaggerated effect. In the video, the men pointed out that they weren't intruding on their neighbors. "Manspreading" is a non-issue, invented by feminists desperate to find something to blame men about, all their other blamings having been pandered to already. The interviewer was infernally rude, in my opinion. She should stop accosting passengers on the train (this wo…
/r/MensRights21/04/18 10:19 AM
0

Your accusations of me being an incel No, I'm not accusing you of being an incel. What I am saying, though, is that you have exhibited an interest in them. An incel specialist, so to speak. And, since the incel sub has closed down, you have come here hoping to find something. Any such hopes won't be fulfilled, because incels are not a topic here; we only see it when types like you come in to mention them; and you stand out because of that, and we can all see what you are trying.
/r/MensRights21/04/18 05:21 AM
5

Do dildos? I guess if you can argue rights for one sort of mechanism, then it would be difficult, even oppressive, to deny the same rights to other sorts. Dildo liberation!
/r/MensRights21/04/18 03:14 AM
0

Wow, I must be a really sneaky incel! If you say so. I didn't even know I was one! You should know better than me. Though you do seem to have a considerable knowledge of the subject. "IncelTears" eh. Never heard of that until just now. In my opinion, someone with a keen interest in the incel sub would miss it when it was closed down, and could possibly go around looking to generate a similar thing in other subs... a wish fulfillment.
/r/MensRights21/04/18 02:54 AM
0

We probably also saw some migrants from r/incels after they had their sub closed. And it appears that you are one of them. Such incel expertise! Rare to see here otherwise. Ironic that this should appear in a thread aimed at controlling the tone of the sub.
/r/MensRights20/04/18 10:23 PM
6

Many of us, especially those of us past a certain age, have affectionate memories of the feminist movement in the 1970s. Roy Baumeister can speak for himself. "Affectionate" isn't the term I would use. Is there anything good that could be said for feminism? The economic scene has changed rapidly in the past couple of hundred years, upsetting the traditional tradeoffs between the sexes. By the 1970s, it was evident that the old arrangement wasn't working and there had to be changes. So, in pressi…
/r/MensRights20/04/18 07:23 AM
5

Gender roles have more to do with division of labor than any biological trait. I believe that the correct technical term for this statement is "crap". The big difference between men and women is that women birth children, and men don't. That's a "biological trait" if anything is. All the male/female divisions of labor are downstream from this.
/r/MensRights19/04/18 07:40 AM
172

It's so ridiculous that it's got to be satire. Isn't it? On the other hand, it's yet another way for men to commit rape (by not having sex), so I'm not sure.
/r/MensRights18/04/18 04:50 AM
10

The Ministry of Finance has published statistics indicating that the employment rate for 25–34-year-old men has fallen from more than 87 per cent to less than 80 per cent over the past decade – a trend that has coincided with a notable decline in the number of births from 61,000 in 2009 to roughly 50,000 in 2017. Whose job is it to do the birthing? You know, the one job that men cannot do? The ladies are falling down on the job. The less they do of it, the more we cosset them by offering them al…
/r/MensRights18/04/18 04:33 AM
34

From 7 years ago https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20110605171009AAlNqej The comments are uniformly disapproving.
/r/MensRights07/04/18 11:56 AM
5

https://hoax-alert.leadstories.com/3469202-fake-news-covington-county-woman-charged-force-fed-cheating-husband-his-own-genitals.html
/r/MensRights07/04/18 07:07 AM
30

But I strongly believe that my sexual encounters followed Middlebury’s clear definition of consent. Following Middlebury’s clear definition of consent didn't do any good, did it. Dunn’s secondhand accusation is completely false, as I have always made it a priority to listen to what each of those five sexual partners wanted to do sexually and will continue to do so. Keep doing the same, expect a different result, Einstein. I think the #MeToo movement is fantastic Hmmm...
/r/MensRights06/04/18 07:23 AM
1

Much better really to remove the trouble makers altogether Great idea. You should let the teachers know, they probably haven't thought of that.
/r/MensRights06/04/18 02:23 AM
12

It's a bait-and-switch operation.
/r/MensRights05/04/18 06:06 AM
10

i feel i want to move way from this country But where to? Looks like everywhere is the same. We have to fix this ourselves.
/r/MensRights05/04/18 05:54 AM
34

Civil suit against the board and principal and parents of the three children. Zero tolerance for this nonsense.
/r/MensRights05/04/18 04:09 AM
3

The worst DPP in living memory, a person who politicised and poisoned the criminal justice system, seemed to regard trials as an annoying impediment to locking up the accused, causing untold misery to innocent men and their loved ones. A suitable epitaph. Now we should focus on the identity and moral character of her successor, bearing in mind her appalling example.
/r/MensRights04/04/18 07:29 AM
7

I meant the original source article, the one that this one references as the source, under the link "Read the article" https://www.burlingtonfreepress.com/story/news/education/university-of-vermont/2018/03/30/no-men-allowed-uvm-hosts-women-only-debate-championship-address-sexism/472613002/
/r/MensRights03/04/18 12:43 PM
3

The actual source article doesn't contain the word "rape".
/r/MensRights03/04/18 12:27 PM
1

Compare the definition of racism from those same dictionaries. There is no bias there towards any one race. It's just that when it comes to the ladies, we all lose our minds.
/r/MensRights01/04/18 05:06 AM
13

Troll. https://www.reddit.com/r/unpopularopinion/comments/87zofg/men_are_actually_more_oppressed_than_women_in/dwhl349/ and https://www.reddit.com/r/unpopularopinion/comments/87zofg/men_are_actually_more_oppressed_than_women_in/dwhl48o/
/r/MensRights29/03/18 08:32 PM
2

A father whose ex-partner was today jailed for 18 years for murdering their son during a custody battle has claimed the authorities dismissed his concerns and missed opportunities to prevent the killing. The "authorities" have the primary responsibility in this murder. They initiated the process which placed the child in the physical control of the mother while simultaneously excluding the child from the father's protection. The mother's responsibility is secondary; it came afterwards. Yet the "…
/r/MensRights27/03/18 08:46 PM
3

Some have criticised BrewDog's joke while others have praised them for donating some of their profits to women's charities. What a bunch of sexist pigs. It should have been all their profits. It's for women, after all.
/r/MensRights26/03/18 02:33 AM
8

For the feminist movement, the challenge is to frame the debate and not to let others decide for us. No, they're going to decide for the rest of us. Business as usual.
/r/MensRights26/03/18 02:23 AM
16

You'd think that a Minister For Women would busy herself about being for women. Nope: she's against men. I'm starting to think that this is a universal rule.
/r/MensRights26/03/18 02:15 AM
8

What a sweet, angelic looking young woman. She allegedly told authorities she struck her husband after he shoved her to the floor. And, the incident report claims, she told police he had abused her in the past and that she was tired of it and “flipped” out on the victim. The bastard! For surely, someone who looks like that could tell no lie. However, according to investigators, Stone’s husband recorded the encounter with his phone and showed the footage to police The video allegedly refuted Ston…
/r/MensRights25/03/18 11:03 PM
9

Ah, the Lobster Riposte.
/r/MensRights18/03/18 05:56 AM
5

all for my amusement If you say so.
/r/MensRights18/03/18 05:52 AM
2

I don't think they can alter the titles. You couldn't call her talk incisive, but at least she's honest about feminism, or her feminism at least.
/r/MensRights18/03/18 05:31 AM
3

OK, so you were responding to his mention of r/vancouver. In your excitement to respond, try not to forget which sub you are posting to, otherwise you may reveal more about your attitudes than you intended.
/r/MensRights18/03/18 05:20 AM
3

How exactly do you "get notifications when our shit shows up in other subs"? What is the mechanism?
/r/MensRights18/03/18 04:55 AM
4

We get notifications when our shit shows up in other subs. "Our shit"? Are you somehow claiming ownership of a CBC news article?
/r/MensRights18/03/18 04:41 AM
6

We moderate based on the rules of the sub not our personal agenda. Strictly impartial, eh? Were that the case, you would not have pursued him to another subreddit, where, unfortunately for you, you cannot delete what you don't like.
/r/MensRights18/03/18 04:16 AM
3

Foetid femininity. Manipulative femininity (contains "man" though). Victimcentric femininity. Feefee femininity. None of these terms disparaging women of course; they're just technical descriptions for particular social conditions. Never heard of them? ... then you're ignorant and need educating. I'm sure a university could start a course or two for modest fees, or feefees.
/r/MensRights11/03/18 07:44 PM
5

Full video (1hr 3min) at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iwEuZ0b6Du4
/r/MensRights11/03/18 10:38 AM
7

https://www.youtube.com/user/Cassiejaye/videos
/r/MensRights11/03/18 06:29 AM
3

I'm also pretty sure this center is funded by the state/my tuition. The first question that occurred to me was "who paid for this?". They are expecting to get a return for their investment. Don't fund sexism indeed. Instead, spend your money in their direction: attend programs, take courses, watch films, read articles and books. That's their courses, films and books, of course. Time is money, so give your time for free to them too: Support campus-based women's centers, attend "take back the nigh…
/r/MensRights10/03/18 02:14 AM
1

The URL checks out http://www.samassini.com/
/r/MensRights08/03/18 11:24 PM
5

Family, civil or criminal courts may grant the new orders on a “freestanding application” from a victim or a member of their family or a support service without the need for police backing. ... but once the order has been granted, I guess the police will be involved to enforce it. Also, I wonder what the list of recognized "support services" will look like.
/r/MensRights08/03/18 12:03 PM
2

Isn't it unfair that there is no Men's day? There is an International Men's Day, November 19th, same as International Toilet day. So it's not "unfair", it's more instructive. Why don't we know about it? The answer to that reveals everything.
/r/MensRights08/03/18 11:38 AM
3

I see that Number 1 is a man. The privileged, supremacist bastard.
/r/MensRights05/03/18 10:45 PM
2

I see that Chase and Sanborn are still in business. So are the makers of the Kenwood Chef (The Chef does everything but cook - that's what wives are for!) and Hoover is still selling vacuum cleaners... the perfect present for your wife. Just imagine her reaction on Christmas morning!
/r/MensRights03/03/18 12:17 AM
2

The exact phrase rule of thumb first became associated with domestic abuse in the 1970s, after which the spurious legal definition was cited as factual in a number of law journals,
/r/MensRights02/03/18 11:48 PM
2

Source for the old Massachusetts law?
/r/MensRights02/03/18 11:33 PM
3

That's not context for this story. You wish.
/r/MensRights01/03/18 01:33 PM
2

That's the direction it would go, if the judges' guidelines in the example above were to be followed.
/r/MensRights01/03/18 12:55 PM
3

Are you denying the context that women are treated with disproportional leniency in the justice system?
/r/MensRights01/03/18 11:41 AM
8

How is this "men's rights"? To see how it's a men's rights issue, you need to be aware of the context. In particular, you need to know that there are arguments for treating women more leniently for crimes. For example, see this thread: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/812hb7/british_new_guidance_for_judges_and_magistrates/ A sufficient number of these sorts of arguments, in the absence of facts, and we start to believe that women don't do these things, or at least their murder victim…
/r/MensRights01/03/18 11:31 AM
3

Travelodge seems to be making a habit of this. Last April, there was a very similar case: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4381724/Widower-accused-PAEDOPHILE-Travelodge-staff.html A father with a daughter, Travelodge telling them that only a double room was available, then calling the police. Travelodge's excuse back then sounded almost identical as well: We take our responsibilities towards protecting children and vulnerable young people extremely seriously. Our colleagues are trained ba…
/r/MensRights18/02/18 10:59 PM
1

The conversation at Jenks’ Dads Group in Alaska revolves around everything from math lessons, to preparing healthy meals, to the latest NFL game. More importantly, with the group, he and the other stay-at-home dads have been able to replicate the social circle they were once shut out of — only this one is exclusively for men. Isn't that illegal?
/r/MensRights17/02/18 11:54 AM
2

The Amazon classification is Books › Self-Help › Abuse If someone objected that this was a book on causing abuse, rather than contenting with it, I guess they could claim it was satire. But then it would have been misclassified.
/r/MensRights17/02/18 11:15 AM
2

Be the change you want to see! Post something of quality today!
/r/MensRights17/02/18 10:41 AM
0

I'm sick of it I feel your pain. Time for you to make a solid, non-whiny, non-petty post of quality then. We all appreciate that sort of stuff.
/r/MensRights17/02/18 10:40 AM
2

Nice to know exactly what it is you mean.
/r/MensRights17/02/18 06:32 AM
1

She's inevitably going to be pissed off, and no amount of niceness on your part will help. You can only avoid her as best you can. If you have acquaintances in common it can get very tricky, but it's worth doing if you can manage it.
/r/MensRights17/02/18 04:04 AM
1

First I didn't state which mistakes need fixing. You didn't. But, in my view, his basic error was not recognizing that her behavior was very close to entrapment; and also in my view, that it's not worth the risk to gamble the wrong way in making the assessment. Second. You're contradicting your point. Him avoiding her may cause the woman scorned "entanglement" you describe. No contradiction. It's just another factor to be taken into account in his future relations, or rather non-relations, with …
/r/MensRights17/02/18 03:49 AM
1

Don't make the same mistakes again Bearing in mind her real-life, proven, in-the-actual-situation behavior, he should avoid repeating the mistake by avoiding her. He needs also to head off any possible "woman scorned" entanglements resulting from it.
/r/MensRights17/02/18 03:29 AM
2

Definition of "incely"?
/r/MensRights17/02/18 02:48 AM
6

Holy shit you are all such sensitive fucking cunts. Tsk... such language! Who cares? You seem to. Why are you so worked up? Calm down, it's not good for you. There is nothing wrong with this ad. There there, concentrate on that. Feel better now? This is the equivalency of women freaking out if a man flirted with a woman in an ad. Eh? AND YES THAT’S A DIRECT EQUIVALENCY IN THE SENSE THAT NEITHER OF THEM FUCKING MATTER. Louder in caps; still incomprehensible. If a woman is screaming at you and bea…
/r/MensRights15/02/18 08:34 PM
5

Edgy, eh. A woman cowering on the floor while a man hurls a dish of tuna casserole at her. Ha ha ha ha ha. Eh, philosaraptor?
/r/MensRights15/02/18 08:11 PM
13

It's funny, The men's rights issue here is not that you find it funny, but whether you would find it so funny were the sexes to be reversed. If not, it illustrates unrecognized antimale bias.
/r/MensRights15/02/18 08:07 PM
9

Yep. But when someone does, it gets ignored, comparatively: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/7xjx95/harvard_university_bans_singlegender_clubs_unless/ I wonder why this is.
/r/MensRights15/02/18 12:30 AM
1

Until someone works out that they can use the same technique against Ford. It's a brave new world now.
/r/MensRights15/02/18 12:19 AM
5

Good question. A couple of hours after the OP was posted, a properly linked post with an accurate title was made: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/7xjx95/harvard_university_bans_singlegender_clubs_unless/ but far down in the number of votes. Odd, that.
/r/MensRights15/02/18 12:12 AM
6

Navigate the seas, negotiate the rapids.
/r/MensRights15/02/18 12:01 AM
-2

Why this particular post?
/r/MensRights13/02/18 07:29 AM
1

Brigade under way now (6:37 am UTC)
/r/MensRights13/02/18 06:38 AM
1

True. The problem comes from the appeal to "equality", in other circumstances. For example, the wage gap. Both men and women should earn the same, right? In that case, equality rules. In the objectification argument, it's different concerns, obviously. There are some slippery types who use one or the other to suit the argument they are making at the moment, would you believe!
/r/MensRights12/02/18 09:39 AM
1

It would depend on the circumstances. But in general, no.
/r/MensRights12/02/18 08:14 AM
6

Think of it as a thought experiment.
/r/MensRights12/02/18 02:26 AM
5

And would you say that the concerns for men and women would differ, in this case of objectifying?
/r/MensRights12/02/18 02:09 AM
10

... when they do it to us. But not when we do it to them. As you initially wrote: hypocrites.
/r/MensRights12/02/18 02:03 AM
7

someone say something so obviously stupid. So ... you wouldn't say something like that to your female boss? Well, at least you're learning. Continue to read this sub for more useful insights.
/r/MensRights12/02/18 01:53 AM
7

when they raise a concern, it should be treated fairly regardless of sex. You have uncritically accepted that men and women are equal. In that case, there should not be any difference in the "objectification" of either sex. But, and the OP is just another example of it, we see that there is. So the "equality" thing is not as simple as you have assumed.
/r/MensRights12/02/18 01:51 AM
13

To point out the double standard in the popular media.
/r/MensRights12/02/18 01:37 AM
13

suddenly objectification is wrong. That's not what the OP wrote. "It's OK when they do it to us".
/r/MensRights12/02/18 01:36 AM
7

Which standard? That men and women are equal?
/r/MensRights12/02/18 01:30 AM
6

youre living life too seriously. Until you compliment your female boss on her cameltoe. Then you could find out just how serious it could be.
/r/MensRights12/02/18 01:29 AM
10

It's also OK when you do it to women. Female boss? Compliment her on her cameltoe and see how well you get on.
/r/MensRights12/02/18 01:05 AM
12

It's silly only if everyone acknowledges the double standard. The difficulty lies in pretending it doesn't exist.
/r/MensRights12/02/18 01:03 AM
8

Only pusillanimous pussies tolerate hypocrisy .
/r/MensRights12/02/18 12:57 AM
14

It's not so much the objectification that's bothersome, it's the hypocrisy and unacknowledged double standard.
/r/MensRights12/02/18 12:55 AM
10

The "wrong" is complaining about "objectifying women", and not complaining when doing the same thing to men, unless of course you also admit to being a sexist hypocrite.
/r/MensRights12/02/18 12:52 AM
8

feminists have an obvious double standard. ... and this article, or rather the general response to it, is a good illustration of that.
/r/MensRights12/02/18 12:47 AM
3

Pusillanimous! Femynyst mouthpieces = pusillanimous pyussies "Lacking in courage and manly strength and resolution; contemptibly fearful"
/r/MensRights12/02/18 12:31 AM
1

If someone wants to claim there was a brigade, it is up to them to provide the evidence, not me. A brigade is quite specific, requiring specific evidence. Unusual behavior however would need less specific evidence. I'm sure there has been unusual behavior here, on the evidence of my own observations. What standard of evidence would be acceptable to you in order for you to say that there had been unusual behavior? criticize feminists This is your real concern here, isn't it?
/r/MensRights10/02/18 10:29 PM
1

Essentially I was asking for concrete evidence for a brigade, as currently there is no evidence other than some personal observations A peer-reviewed academic research project would be better, I agree. (which is essentially anecdotal) about the post. Anecdotal is bad, except when there isn't anything else to go on, in which case it's better than nothing. And enough anecdotes is data. I'm setting the bar higher for proof lon this, as facts form a large part of MRA debate, I would've expected my f…
/r/MensRights10/02/18 09:54 PM
1

Can you provide a link showing the traffic from the brigade? I'm curious to know how this could be done. It could be a useful tool, especially in these circumstances. Or is it just your equivalent of demanding a citation? Are you making the brigade claim solely based on your own observation. He may be, but FWIW it's my observation too. An otherwise unremarkable post suddenly gets massively upvoted. If you catch it at the right time, you can just keep refreshing the screen and see the count ticki…
/r/MensRights10/02/18 09:32 PM
2

So that's where u/ThePigmanAgain has been hanging out.
/r/MensRights10/02/18 08:47 PM
4

gratitude No good deed goes unpunished.
/r/MensRights10/02/18 08:38 PM
5

Him: pick a topic and I'll debate you You: I'm not going to stick around to have a conversation Hmmm ... shall we say .... pathetic?
/r/MensRights10/02/18 06:19 AM
21

I wonder what his version of the story is.
/r/MensRights09/02/18 08:17 AM
32

WTF is this "mentoring" they keep on about? I thought we had to claw our way to the top over a pile of dead lobsters. Never heard the term until it cropped up in the context of "mentoring women" and ... oh ok, never mind.
/r/MensRights07/02/18 05:03 AM
7

Finally, we've outdone the Victorians.
/r/MensRights02/02/18 08:17 AM
1

For some time now ive had a sneaking suspicion that someone who knew of me a few years back was spreading some dirt about me pretty darn agressively. First step is to identify the true source of the lies. A deliberate liar will often try to hide behind someone else, or a group of someone elses. Do the rumors contain information that only she would know? If not, consider other possible sources. Who can you think of would benefit from doing you down? Next step: try to predict the direction of futu…
/r/MensRights01/02/18 05:58 AM
1

Statistically insignificant ... Give damn about statistics Wrong domain. It's not "statistics", where you try to infer the parameters of a bigger population from a smaller sample of it. It's the BBC. It's a census, not a sample.
/r/MensRights01/02/18 01:21 AM
3

Nothing's been taken out of context. https://issuu.com/metro_canada/docs/20160601_ca_vancouver Vancouver Metro, Wednesday, June 1st, 2016, page 5.
/r/MensRights30/01/18 08:46 AM
7

It's a good illustration of the invisibility of men as a group, compared to women, even though the numbers are much smaller for women. That bias is unremarked by everyone everywhere, except for people like us pointing it out. As long as the problem continues, it's worth continuing to point it out.
/r/MensRights30/01/18 08:04 AM
9

It’s kind of taken out of context, It kind of isn't. It's presented as just another fact about homelessness in Vancouver, solidly in context with the rest of the article. The unconscious invisibility of men as a group is the point of the post.
/r/MensRights30/01/18 07:59 AM
2

It doesn't talk about periods; it's a general article on homelessness. Page 5 of the Vancouver Metro, Wednesday June 1st 2016. https://issuu.com/metro_canada/docs/20160601_ca_vancouver
/r/MensRights30/01/18 07:31 AM
9

it seems like somebody is trying to get the MRA community riled up about a doctored document. Not in this case. It's a general article on homelessness. https://issuu.com/metro_canada/docs/20160601_ca_vancouver Vancouver Metro, Wednesday, June 1st, 2016, page 5.
/r/MensRights30/01/18 07:23 AM
7

This article is focusing on how homeless women have periods and have to bleed everywhere Nope. https://issuu.com/metro_canada/docs/20160601_ca_vancouver Vancouver Metro, Jun1, 2016, page 5.
/r/MensRights30/01/18 07:17 AM
3

You’re just seeing one tiny bit of an article. Tiny, but revealing.
/r/MensRights30/01/18 06:24 AM
2

Same reason as I once watched videos of zits being popped, I think. But you can get too much of that stuff.
/r/MensRights30/01/18 02:56 AM
19

16:02 "It wasn't learning about men's issues that made me part with feminism. It was actually learning about feminism that made me leave feminism."
/r/MensRights30/01/18 02:53 AM
2

What a waste of time you are.
/r/MensRights30/01/18 01:21 AM
1

Every little bit helps.
/r/MensRights28/01/18 10:48 PM
3

So, in France, when it comes to women, keep yourself safe by not noticing them. But don't not notice them too much. There's a "read more" linked from that article, to Women shunned in some Muslim neighborhoods in France https://www.rt.com/news/370265-women-shunned-in-france/ where you can read in some neighborhoods in France women have become “undesirable in public places.” (Presumably the men are safe from the fines in those public places). Women were reportedly “Extremely shocked [by men’s rea…
/r/MensRights27/01/18 05:50 AM
2

FYI the names of victims/accusers are not anonymous in sex crimes. They are in the UK.
/r/MensRights27/01/18 04:53 AM
2

Seriously now, this has revealed a serious joke gap. Women have 27.3% fewer jokes. Or maybe 57.8%. Is it all down to gender? Jordan, a multivariate analysis please...
/r/MensRights25/01/18 11:21 PM
4

Republican Senator Roger Wicker has been roundly criticised after he was caught in footage calling underage teenagers “beautiful girls”. Caught! Ha! The creepy old pervert. Underage girls, too. Underage for what, exactly, Harriet? Looks like Roger's and Harriet's minds are in different places. The 66-year-old made the comments 66 years old. That's the reason. Stuck in the past. The old fuddy duddy doesn't realize it's sex, sex, sex, filth, and sex all the way... beautiful indeed. He needs to get…
/r/MensRights25/01/18 01:07 AM
1

Link: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/roger-wicker-teenage-girls-beautiful-hot-mic-comments-senator-republican-a8173521.html
/r/MensRights25/01/18 12:47 AM
2

http://torontosun.com/2017/03/09/ryerson-instructor-tells-student-to-only-rely-on-feminist-journals/wcm/82d43d86-1013-4d6e-9377-bb4dca2e5365
/r/MensRights24/01/18 11:14 AM
1

http://torontosun.com/2017/03/09/ryerson-instructor-tells-student-to-only-rely-on-feminist-journals/wcm/82d43d86-1013-4d6e-9377-bb4dca2e5365
/r/MensRights24/01/18 11:11 AM
1

http://torontosun.com/2017/03/09/ryerson-instructor-tells-student-to-only-rely-on-feminist-journals/wcm/82d43d86-1013-4d6e-9377-bb4dca2e5365
/r/MensRights24/01/18 11:05 AM
2

http://torontosun.com/2017/03/09/ryerson-instructor-tells-student-to-only-rely-on-feminist-journals/wcm/82d43d86-1013-4d6e-9377-bb4dca2e5365
/r/MensRights24/01/18 11:04 AM
3

http://torontosun.com/2017/03/09/ryerson-instructor-tells-student-to-only-rely-on-feminist-journals/wcm/82d43d86-1013-4d6e-9377-bb4dca2e5365
/r/MensRights24/01/18 11:04 AM
2

http://torontosun.com/2017/03/09/ryerson-instructor-tells-student-to-only-rely-on-feminist-journals/wcm/82d43d86-1013-4d6e-9377-bb4dca2e5365
/r/MensRights24/01/18 11:03 AM
2

I'll let you decide from this data if the professor is lying The professor asserts it's all down to the glass ceiling. That data doesn't show that. and if the wage gap is real. It does show a gap. But it would be more meaningful if it showed hourly income. There is no data there for overtime and, although it says "full-time", for hours actually worked.
/r/MensRights24/01/18 01:35 AM
1

Here's another joke for you, Laughing Boy: World Ends! Women most affected!
/r/MensRights24/01/18 12:04 AM
1

Laugh on. https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DB-WtzwXoAEkKyg.jpg
/r/MensRights23/01/18 11:51 PM
22

The definition of rape has been extended again and again to include more and more ordinary situations, for example sex while drunk. This is done so that more and more women can use the power that the accusation gives them, in more and more contexts. However, all this has the result of diluting its definition, and consequently reducing the effectiveness of its use. So to compensate, the seriousness of the extended definition is exaggerated in order to keep the severity of the penalty the same. Th…
/r/MensRights23/01/18 08:44 AM
8

Left, right, alt this, alt that, marxist, communist, socialist, conservative, authoritarian, liberal, libertarian, lib this, lib that, lib the other. All just about meaningless from overuse. Pick your group membership marker for today! New one tomorrow!
/r/MensRights23/01/18 08:15 AM
7

LOL
/r/MensRights23/01/18 08:07 AM
1

a reason these homeless people don't file bankruptcy to clear the debt Maybe because they don't have a permanent address.
/r/MensRights23/01/18 03:36 AM
2

The general perception is that it's generally a female problem. This isn't true.
/r/MensRights23/01/18 03:15 AM
6

Oh god shut the fuck up. Yeah, let's not address the problem.
/r/MensRights23/01/18 03:06 AM
2

Too bad so many of us men choose not to be men. Shame Our homeless have more opportunity than a majority of countries in this world from income opportunities The US? Isn't that where, if you can't get a job for long enough, they write you out of the unemployment statistics? to charity programs. I don’t understand homelessness in this country. Nor me. The richest country in the world. I guess it has a lot of people there who like being paid rent. I wish mensrights more often behaved with dignity …
/r/MensRights23/01/18 03:02 AM
0

Yep, looks like that to me too. However it came about though, it makes a good point about a real problem.
/r/MensRights23/01/18 02:49 AM
0

Disagree. There is a real problem that needs to be addressed, and this is good publicity. Would you have objected if the genders had been reversed?
/r/MensRights23/01/18 02:47 AM
13

You should organize a group to help homeless men. The first step in doing that is to raise awareness of the problem.
/r/MensRights23/01/18 02:17 AM
-1

She also insisted the job of the authorities was to ensure men are not wrongly put on trial Not doing her job, then.
/r/MensRights22/01/18 08:49 PM
5

acceptable casualties? Your use of "acceptable" carries the implication that his acceptance, or otherwise, has a meaning in this situation. In terms of any agency he may have, it doesn't. Whatever his preferences, he has no control, no power, so it doesn't matter whether he has any fucks to give or not. Who had the power to create, and did create, this situation? The feminists. Theirs were the fucks that mattered, back then anyway. They have the responsibility. In terms of agency, thwml's zero f…
/r/MensRights22/01/18 07:51 PM
5

You are being unusually persistent, after having been asked to be patient. Are you trying to prejudge the settlement process?
/r/MensRights20/01/18 07:29 AM
3

Lol nerdy hobbies make me an incel? What exactly is this "incel" thing you keep harping on about? The only times I see it mentioned here is on these highly upvoted posts which I suspect attracts the attention of non-MRA types. What is it, and why does it concern you so much?
/r/MensRights19/01/18 09:40 PM
56

Lawyers asked for the case to be dropped hours after Alison Saunders, the director of public prosecutions, raised eyebrows when she said photographs and social media accounts do not necessarily need to be fully checked in rape cases. Alison Saunders should resign.
/r/MensRights19/01/18 10:09 AM
3

Her points about the trial: They are currently in settlement talks, which are privileged, so she can't supply details yet. The defendants appeared to be somewhat ready to offer a settlement. By the end of January, either a settlement or a new trial date should be known. Alison will go for justice, even if it means going to the bitter end in a final judgement. She is confident that, although they might lose on a point of law, they wouldn't lose on the facts. Harry Kopyto's opinion is that they ha…
/r/MensRights19/01/18 04:49 AM
2

time for an update: Alison Tieman in her own words: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ccjJUYSmwbc
/r/MensRights19/01/18 04:31 AM
2

Something interesting. He says "I got you" and she agrees saying "Yes you have got me." Yes, it stands out as an unusual departure from the rest of her "interviewer technique." Not that it makes some of things she said any less ridiculous but the fact that she's willing to accept that he has made a very good argument is respectable. I don't think she accepted anything. She had spent the entire previous twenty minutes just ignoring what he said and talking all over him, so why suddenly change her…
/r/MensRights19/01/18 01:05 AM
8

A real exemplar of the UK interview style. Ask a question, then talk all over the answer, then put your own completely different words in his mouth. You'd think the audience would want to hear what the interviewee says... but no, you just get the party line from the interviewer. Why don't they dispense with the interviewee altogether, and just tell the audience what to think. It would save time. And what is going on at 23:03 - 23:09 (gotcha)? She spends the previous twenty minutes shamelessly ig…
/r/MensRights18/01/18 05:58 AM
2

on show in the Bellevue Art Museum On one of the toilet walls, I presume.
/r/MensRights16/01/18 10:07 PM
5

the guy could have likely just left her and taken the kids if he really cared too Really?
/r/MensRights14/01/18 07:58 PM
5

I'm surprised that anyone at Google had time to get any work done. Must be coasting on the productivity of the past. It goes some way to explaining the unsatisfactory search results I've been getting lately.
/r/MensRights11/01/18 07:09 AM
7

His memo is all lies Doesn't seem that way to me. Can you quote an actual lie? But those differences are extremely small and if people were employed purely on the basis of ability, we would predict no or nearly no difference between genders across the board. Damore actually wrote "the distribution of preferences and abilities of men and women", so your narrowing of the topic to just "abilities" is deceptive. Also, in this vein, he writes about the contributions of differences in personality and …
/r/MensRights11/01/18 05:20 AM
2

It's standard Duluth Wheel stuff. Run through OCR and Google Translate: Woman's Center Women, it is our right to live without violence Villasana 1697 Quinta Normal. Attention Monday to Friday from 9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Fonos: 227864811 I cellular: 5-41 23707 /[email protected] Your partner or ex-partner: Does not let you work or study? Does it control you, harass you and decide for you? Does it disqualify you and make fun of what do you do? Is he indifferent to you and ignores y…
/r/MensRights10/01/18 05:59 AM
3

Free or discounted universities for girls who dream of one day working as a data scientist, Big Data expert, investment analyst or engineer. I wonder how many of those there are, really.
/r/MensRights09/01/18 07:17 AM
2

We should make it illegal There oughtta be a Law! What sort of a law? - encourage to families – and women in particular – to increase their workforce participation. In other words, one that forces something on women. Want to stay at home and look after your children, gurl? Too bad... Lisa Annese hasn't got the patience for that. Out to work with you! Registers several milliHitlers on the nazometer.
/r/MensRights09/01/18 07:03 AM
11

Women are biologically stronger than men and more likely to survive a life-threatening crisis, study suggests You go, girl!!! http://www.radionz.co.nz/news/world/347710/heart-attack-care-dangerously-unequal-for-women-study Heart attack care dangerously unequal for women - study Women were two times more likely to die from the most serious type of heart attack than men in the year after having one. Researchers believe it is due to differences in the care given. They don't advance the same explana…
/r/MensRights09/01/18 05:06 AM
3

Is MeToo the end point of all this lunacy? Nope. There is no end point. We can see here the next step Instead of metoo we could start an Idid movement. Expecting perpetrators to come forward. This pressures predatory individuals to take the spotlight, rather than expecting the victims to express their traumatic/embarrassing experiences. Since it’s very unlikely that people will incriminate themselves openly, I suggest an alternative. We could expose inflammatory people by doing #IAskFirst. Peopl…
/r/MensRights09/01/18 04:17 AM
7

For many weeks now, the conversation that has been going on in private about this reckoning is radically different from the public one. This is not a good sign, suggesting the sort of social intimidation that is the underside of a culture of political correctness, such as we are increasingly living in. It's more than just political correctness though. The women I know — of all ages — have responded by and large with a mixture of slightly horrified excitement (bordering on titillation) as to who …
/r/MensRights07/01/18 12:54 AM
6

Lord Morris asked whether the Government was “satisfied that the disclosure procedures in criminal cases conducted by the Crown Prosecution Service is functioning properly”, and whether ministers would now authorise “an independent inquiry on the role of the CPS and its relationship with the police”. Bring it on!
/r/MensRights07/01/18 12:39 AM
1

this is the new r/incels What is this incels thing you lot keep mentioning? I tried to view it but it says it's banned.
/r/MensRights07/01/18 12:01 AM
2

Seen
/r/MensRights05/01/18 05:42 AM
3

get the message out that such remarks are not tolerated here You could do that yourself, by posting your response whenever you see one of these intolerable messages. That would counteract the bad message with your good one, and also place you on the same footing as everyone else. You are trying to amplify your wants by asking the system to do it for you. You set the standard, your work is done! The question that comes up is: what are the qualifications to enforce moral standards on others?
/r/MensRights05/01/18 04:45 AM
1

it has to be of actual relevance to the case. In cases where it's her word against his, with no other corroborating evidence, then the quality of her word becomes relevant. If she had a history of lying or fantasizing, for example; not necessarily restricted to only sexual matters. Her anonymity would then prevent others who knew about her likelihood to lie (or not) from coming forward. This is an argument for neither of them to be anonymous.
/r/MensRights03/01/18 06:36 PM
38

It's UK law. The stated aim is encouragement of more accusers.
/r/MensRights02/01/18 10:52 PM
10

During the first round of interviews in the last 3 months of 2013, many of my interlocutors expressed grave concerns for my safety when told about my plan to interview MRAs ... intensive campaigns of online harassment against women ... Anita Sarkeesian ... organized harassment, directly connected to and condoned by the Men’s Rights Movement, intentionally sought to terrorize ... death and rape threats ... anonymous bomb and mass shooting threats It became clear to me that the more distance I was…
/r/MensRights02/01/18 03:40 AM
6

“People were moved so viscerally,” said Ms. Eitel, who helps moderate Time’s Up meetings, which began in October. “They didn’t come together because they wanted to whine, or complain, or tell a story or bemoan. They came together because they intended to act. There was almost a ferociousness to it, especially in the first meetings.” I think this is an example of gynocentrism, woman style, in action. It's "visceral" (= instinctive). Time’s Up is leaderless, run by volunteers and made up of workin…
/r/MensRights02/01/18 02:19 AM
11

now you’re twisting the original statement. It was presented to me as “1 in 4 are raped”. You’ve now changed it This "rape" thing is like that. All sorts of people do it. You, for instance. 1-12 suffer assault or rape.
/r/MensRights31/12/17 07:42 PM
9

it’s the simple ick factor. “I don’t do trash juices,” said Gabriela Herman, 36 “Ew, it’s the actual bins,” said Ashita Trika, 39 Sophie Galant, 24, a consultant, lives with female roommates in a San Francisco apartment and routinely passes the honor of trash duty to guy friends who come for dinner. “I always ask them to take it out on their way out,” she said. “It smells. And I don’t want it to drip on me.” Biologically determined. The babies, and therefore the ladies, are kept as far as possib…
/r/MensRights31/12/17 03:08 AM
13

Person Personperson? Nah. There are severe problems with that. Three sons for a start.
/r/MensRights31/12/17 02:52 AM
1

What's wrong with going to school, getting a job, making $$$, getting a nice car, Nice job, if you can get it banging a bunch of bitches, Hold on there, bud. You wouldn't be impugning the Ladies now would you? That's a hanging offense these days. If not 2017, then 2018 and not complaining about shit? Why complain? We not complain Is there anything stopping you from doing all of the above? The cold clammy grasp of the Ravening Maw.
/r/MensRights31/12/17 02:45 AM
97

The jury was given a misleading impression of a message reading ‘sorry’, which was construed as being about the alleged rape. In fact, it was a response to the woman asking him why he was ignoring her. Also omitted from the version presented to the jury was her response: ‘Dnt [sic] be.’ The evidence has been selectively edited. Another message suggested Mr Kay had lied about his age during their first Facebook conversation. He asks the girl how old she is, to which she replies: ‘Nearly 17.’ He t…
/r/MensRights31/12/17 12:42 AM
7

She has said that Roy Bryant, whom she later divorced, was physically abusive to her. “The circumstances under which she told the story were coercive,” Dr. Tyson said. The false accusation may be sixty years old, but something has remained the same.
/r/MensRights30/12/17 06:38 PM
1

Occupations with a greater share of females pay less than those with a lower share, controlling for education and skill. This association is explained by two dominant views: devaluation and queuing. Both of these views assume discrimination by employers. They omit any other sort of cause. The bias is built-in from the start. The former views the pay offered in an occupation to affect its female proportion, due to employers’ preference for men -a gendered labor queue. The latter argues that the p…
/r/MensRights30/12/17 04:39 AM
2

CRIMINAL JURISDICTION ADELAIDE (Australia) WEDNESDAY, 30 AUGUST 2017 AT 9.20 A.M. BEFORE HIS HONOUR JUDGE COSTELLO Full remarks: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/7mexn5/flip_the_script_no_consequences_for_her/drubwq0/
/r/MensRights28/12/17 03:50 AM
1

what gender was the judge Male.
/r/MensRights28/12/17 03:47 AM
1

Has anyone sought the judge's reasoning on the sentence? Here it is: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/7mexn5/flip_the_script_no_consequences_for_her/drubwq0/
/r/MensRights28/12/17 01:03 AM
1

Shane McMahon of Adelaide, Australia.
/r/MensRights28/12/17 12:57 AM
4

Here's the reasoning of the judge: COURT REMARKS ​IN THE DISTRICT COURT CRIMINAL JURISDICTION ADELAIDE WEDNESDAY, 30 AUGUST 2017 AT 9.20 A.M. BEFORE HIS HONOUR JUDGE COSTELLO NO.DCCRM-17-593 R V LORIEN NORMAN HIS HONOUR IN SENTENCING SAID: Lorien Norman, you pleaded guilty to one count of aggravated causing harm with intent to cause harm, the maximum penalty for which is 13 years imprisonment. The offence is aggravated because it was committed against your own child. In terms of your offending I…
/r/MensRights28/12/17 12:55 AM
2

Not the one you're thinking of though.
/r/MensRights28/12/17 12:50 AM
1

Wrong Shane McMahon. This one lives in Adelaide.
/r/MensRights28/12/17 12:50 AM
6

I would hope, and do think, that if the father had her history and were in her position, he'd receive the same (medical and psychological) treatment. Really?
/r/MensRights27/12/17 11:15 PM
7

but a guy can Wrong word; it implies he's got a choice.
/r/MensRights25/12/17 06:10 AM
6

A new, unpublished analysis of “Star Wars” films shows striking progress in their representation of gender and race. Star Wars, set in a universe with many other species, some of them mechanical. The bar scene in the original movie comes to mind. With all that to choose from, what do we actually find? Gender - human - and race - human. It's narrowing the perspective. women spoke 6.3 percent of dialogue in “A New Hope,” the 1977 film that kicked off the franchise. In contrast, women accounted for…
/r/MensRights23/12/17 12:38 AM
2

When I heard of the collapse of the rape case against student Liam Allan and that the pivotal reason for the CPS offering no further evidence against him was the late disclosure of evidence, I felt real anger. The worm turns.
/r/MensRights22/12/17 07:02 AM
3

I suspect you've just seen gynocentrism in action, from the women's viewpoint. She's just supporting the sisters and, like it or not, at some time or other, they are all like that.
/r/MensRights22/12/17 02:29 AM
1

Well, what can I say? Let it be a lesson to you. Don't bother trying to convince them by reason, argument, or any sort of rational process. You're out of your area and totally outclassed. Use your time more productively from now on. If the urge comes over to you read twoxchromosomes (or any other subreddit of a Ladies Lie Club nature) go do something useful instead, like clean the toilet. Smells better, too.
/r/MensRights22/12/17 02:11 AM
4

Charlotte Proudman: These cases have rightly highlighted the systematic issues about fair disclosure, which have the potential to cause injustice for defendants and complainants alike. Agree. But... But what is regrettable is a disproportionate focus on failed rape prosecutions when collapsed trials for other crimes are widespread, yet they rarely hit the headlines. An immediate attempt to dilute the problem by introducing "other crimes". Wrong. No matter how many other crimes have been badly ha…
/r/MensRights21/12/17 11:38 PM
1

If anyone here is more concerned with this than ending selective service for men, or baby-dick cutting, you don't care for mens rights. Wrong.
/r/MensRights21/12/17 11:09 PM
10

#AnotherOne
/r/MensRights21/12/17 10:51 PM
5

The whole theory of the justice system is based on the responsibility of victims to report crimes against them. Not in general. For example, murders are prosecuted without the victim having to come forward. The problem occurs only where there is no evidence, other than what the complainant says. The word of the complainant can cause severe consequences for the target of her complaints, so there should be restraint, of some sort, on acting on her complaint, to preserve justice. The restraint shou…
/r/MensRights21/12/17 08:21 PM
22

Sources told the Times that Thornton believes Henriques' arguments had substance. But she faces resistance from senior members of the College of Policing, which provides guidance for forces and wants to maintain the status quo. Here we go... They have cited research by the NSPCC and rape crisis groups showing that fear of not being believed has been a major factor in victims not coming forward in the past. What they are saying is that accusations are more important than truth. The incidents came…
/r/MensRights21/12/17 06:13 PM
10

Robert Webb viciously attacks He appears to be trying to recover from an appalling childhood, trying to avoid getting it wrong like his dad, in my view displacing his efforts into a wrong direction, and getting it wrong there too. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4A4KHm3brJE
/r/MensRights21/12/17 01:50 AM
1

I was thinking more of the advice to the OP that he should sue. Sue whom, though. If she did in fact look prepubescent, then you could expect a number of people to come up with the accusation independently. If, on the other hand, she looked like an adult, then this would indicate a group of gossipers; and maybe assist in identifying who they were.
/r/MensRights20/12/17 11:25 PM
10

His defence team demanded the police hand over her texts in September but only got them last week and found that the alleged victim had constantly lied. Their statement said: 'Isaac Itiary is a 25-year-old man and father that has spent the last four months in custody in respect of these allegations which he has always strenuously denied. Pre-emptive punishment. 'Contrary to statements by the Crown Prosecution Service and the Metropolitan Police Service the issues in the case have always been wel…
/r/MensRights20/12/17 10:35 PM
1

Yes, it's strange that "pedophilia" is the group accusation here. I would have expected something more like sex predator, more along MeToo lines. OP, does she look prepubescent?
/r/MensRights20/12/17 07:41 PM
2

Television, the great mind rot machine. These unfortunate victims deserve our sympathy, and maybe sheltered accommodations, but don't take their ravings too seriously.
/r/MensRights20/12/17 07:33 PM
38

Last night, amid mounting calls for an independent inquiry, the Metropolitan Police announced that every live case being investigated by its Child Abuse and Sexual Offences squad was now being reviewed to ensure that all digital evidence has been properly examined, documented and shared Every live case... and they should also be reviewing every historical case, starting with those where the convicted are still serving sentences. Those should be looked at immediately.
/r/MensRights20/12/17 07:05 AM
1

the different sexes ARE better then the other at specific things. Women are far superior to men at carrying and birthing children. Men are better then women at just about everything else. Yep. From there, it's a reasonable inference that there must be a built-in mechanism for transferring "everything else" from men to women. That would be gynocentrism, wielded by both men and women. It used to work, but it doesn't these days. Why? My answer is that modern technology has over-enabled gynocentrism…
/r/MensRights20/12/17 01:26 AM
16

Critics of the law have said it will not lead to more convictions, but Mr Löfven said it was also about “changing society’s attitudes and values”, The Local reported. Showing what they're really after. In addition to the sexual consent law, the government is also planning other legislation which will improved victim support service, fight sexual exploitation and human trafficking, make buying sex abroad illegal and increase prison sentences for offenders. Great to be a man in Sweden, eh? There i…
/r/MensRights19/12/17 06:34 PM
2

Lord Keen, a justice minister, rejected the idea of a judge-led inquiry. But he said there would be a joint internal review by the CPS and police “to determine what occurred in that case”. Coverup alert.
/r/MensRights19/12/17 05:41 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter