TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

mensmod Archive

View 18 posts and 2,039 comments by mensmod on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
887

Moderatormensmod/r/MensRights14/08/21 03:56 PM
316

Marriage/Childrenmensmod/r/MensRights20/11/19 03:27 PM
237

mensmod/r/MensRights29/04/19 07:24 PM
213

Social Issuesmensmod/r/MensRights18/05/21 05:17 AM
145

Moderatormensmod/r/MensRights11/07/17 05:32 PM
143

Activism/Supportmensmod/r/MensRights05/12/17 05:17 AM
91

Moderatormensmod/r/MensRights15/03/23 04:12 PM
75

Social Issuesmensmod/r/MensRights02/10/17 11:26 PM
71

Moderatormensmod/r/MensRights10/09/19 01:27 PM
49

Moderatormensmod/r/MensRights30/06/20 03:49 PM
44

Social Issuesmensmod/r/MensRights14/09/22 03:15 PM
38

Intactivismmensmod/r/MensRights21/07/18 04:37 PM
35

Discriminationmensmod/r/MensRights14/09/19 03:02 PM
27

Moderatormensmod/r/MensRights08/07/17 09:02 PM
22

Generalmensmod/r/MensRights11/10/18 08:01 AM
20

Generalmensmod/r/MensRights22/08/21 04:51 PM
5

Marriage/Childrenmensmod/r/MensRights11/07/18 06:00 PM
3

Social Issuesmensmod/r/MensRights08/10/18 04:38 PM
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 2,039 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Being downvoted is not grounds for being banned from the sub. I don't take instructions from users.
/r/MensRights07/05/23 02:20 PM
1

Your comment was the one that was reported. And bigotry is about prejudice against a group. The other comment generalized, but not in a negative way.
/r/MensRights07/05/23 02:01 PM
1

If you modify that statement to say "On average..." you are right. Otherwise, you are a bigot.
/r/MensRights07/05/23 01:13 PM
3

I wish the members of this subreddit could see some of the discussions you have had with researchers wanting to do research on this subreddit. It is very enlightening, and you seem to have a VERY good grasp of the issues.
/r/MensRights06/05/23 05:38 PM
1

hah, rich. The guy using feminist tactics is accusing someone of being feminist. No, we are trying to be better by holding our own members accountable. The feminist subreddits don't do this, they don't hold their own members accountable. Nice try.
/r/MensRights25/04/23 10:35 PM
1

This isn't your personal "let's bash women" subreddit. See specific instances? Sure, call it out. Women get this all the time, too - they get called lesbians/dykes for not being interested in men. This isn't a gendered problem, but fairly universal actually.
/r/MensRights25/04/23 08:59 PM
1

Feel free. I can remove that one, too.
/r/MensRights25/04/23 07:24 PM
1

Woman != Feminist The title argues that feminists are using homophobic insults. Try again.
/r/MensRights25/04/23 06:50 PM
–

I have removed this post. It can be reinstated if you provide any shred of evidence that this is actually happening. Fabricating claims, like the feminists do, is not something we do here.
/r/MensRights25/04/23 06:37 PM
–

This is satire. If you don't get that, you are clearly missing big parts of the gender rights debates.
/r/MensRights18/04/23 09:57 PM
–

There is a lot of attacks against women in this post. This has devolved from an issue about rights to an issue about women as a gender.
/r/MensRights18/04/23 08:43 PM
–

This issue is about transgenderism, not the male gender.
/r/MensRights11/04/23 05:45 PM
–

I didn't see anywhere in the video where they scream that the mother sexual assaults them. Also, there is no context in the video that suggests the children are being forcibly taken from their father.
/r/MensRights06/04/23 10:04 PM
2

Maybe inform yourself rather than ask? See sidebar.
/r/MensRights01/04/23 05:46 AM
3

Agreed that it is off topic. Some trans issues are relevant here, though. When a trans individual is treated poorly because of the male part of their trans status, that is relevant to the subject of this subreddit.
/r/MensRights31/03/23 09:21 PM
–

Title and content don't match.
/r/MensRights19/03/23 12:18 PM
–

This doesn't have anything to do with rights.
/r/MensRights18/03/23 09:08 PM
1

You don't get banned for stating an opinion. This isn't a feminist subreddit.
/r/MensRights18/03/23 06:40 PM
–

Screenshots should have names blanked out to prevent brigading/harassment. Please repost with names blanked out.
/r/MensRights08/03/23 04:49 PM
1

Okay! I will drop it then. :)
/r/MensRights12/02/23 05:58 PM
1

Remove that link and the comment should be able to be approved. Otherwise no one is seeing it. :(
/r/MensRights12/02/23 02:27 PM
1

One of the links you posted is putting your post in the perpetual spam filter that we can't undo. You may want to selectively remove links to figure out which one it is. (Remove, then review, etc)
/r/MensRights11/02/23 08:59 PM
8

Yikes. Your poor kids. :(
/r/MensRights10/02/23 09:43 PM
–

If the comments aren't what you expected, say what you expected. This isn't youtube, stop using clickbait tactics.
/r/MensRights25/01/23 12:39 AM
2

Reddit admins banned /r/MGTOW and /r/TheRedPill, and so they all came here. We are working on the issue, but it isn't easy.
/r/MensRights22/01/23 04:42 AM
–

Note: No one is entitled to affection. That is not a right that people have. If you are in a relationship that does not meet your emotional needs, you can end that relationship and find one that will meet your emotional needs. Clear communication and establishment of relationship needs before marriage or cohabitation is important.
/r/MensRights18/01/23 08:56 PM
–

If you can point out many examples, do so. We have an expectation that posts claiming that the reverse wouldn't be tolerated actually demonstrate it.
/r/MensRights16/01/23 02:21 PM
–

Removed. I just noticed that this contained personal information.
/r/MensRights12/01/23 06:22 AM
–

This is not a subreddit to discuss trans rights issues.
/r/MensRights08/01/23 07:47 AM
2

An attempt to investigate this found no other sources supporting it.
/r/MensRights06/01/23 05:31 AM
1

I was the one who removed them.
/r/MensRights04/01/23 07:10 PM
1

Discussions about what Thunberg said have been left up. But discussions about Tate are taken down. The MR issue is relevant, Tate is not.
/r/MensRights04/01/23 04:27 PM
11

Yup. Welcome to your first Andrew Tate thread as a moderator. :)
/r/MensRights30/12/22 09:22 PM
-2

He started the reference to his penis by making innuendo with "emission". She responded in like kind. If you can't take it, don't try to dish it out.
/r/MensRights30/12/22 03:59 PM
-2

No, he is flat out wrong in the majority of what he says. He just says untrue things that his audience already believes, so they don't call him out on it. It is like someone talking shit about vaccines to an anti-vax crowd - of course those people are going to say "He isn't saying anything untrue but he is saying it in an assholish way". All you did is out yourself as someone who is as unintelligent as Tate, but less of an asshole.
/r/MensRights30/12/22 03:58 PM
-5

He was using his car emission as innuendo. It was obvious.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/12/22 03:01 PM
73

That is why I remove anything I see about Tate on MensRights. It isn't a men's rights issue, and he is a scammer that should be deplatformed.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/12/22 02:57 AM
-20

He started it by talking about his "emission". He made sexual innuendo first. She responded in like kind. I feel it was justified.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/12/22 02:57 AM
2

They have.
/r/MensRights21/12/22 07:44 PM
2

Is it actual "hate" on women, or is it expressions of frustration towards men's place in society as compared to women? A lot of people come to this subreddit because they are frustrated in their life with issues related to gender. They need a place to vent it. Overall, there are a lot of posts here that focus on legitimate issues and reasonable approaches. Take TheTinMan posts. Those are amazing, and not in the least bit extreme. The biggest problem is that MGTOW and TheRedPill subreddits got ba…
/r/MensRights14/12/22 10:51 AM
2

In this case, maybe this person needs to see that feedback to help them realize that they are part of the problem? You will notice that your comments got upvoted. Sometimes we (mods) leave these things up here so that people like you can provide the reply that is needed.
/r/MensRights13/12/22 08:34 PM
-7

Thread locked. OP seems to just be attacking people who think differently.
/r/MensRights13/12/22 04:17 AM
-5

Are you blind to the things that are posted on this sub? All of the comments about fat femenazis, femoids, chameleons, pick-mes, etc? The same shit is going on on both sides.
/r/MensRights08/12/22 03:12 PM
-4

I swear you must be American with a viewpoint like that... All the brainwashing in their media that "my way of thinking must be right, so let's perform some mental gymnastics to ensure I don't have to question my way of thinking." Feminism isn't a group. It is an ideology. You outed your lack of understanding right there. It is an ideology I don't agree with, but at least I have the intellectual honesty to not mischaracterize it. Hate is hate. You can disagree with anything you want, but you sho…
/r/MensRights08/12/22 03:11 PM
-9

How is this any different than people do here towards feminists? Feminists get described as fat, ugly, masculine, etc. Ad hominem attacks are common from those who lack the intelligence or desire to make more cogent arguments. It is not a gendered or sided issue. It is universal.
/r/MensRights08/12/22 02:38 PM
1

This subreddit cannot provide legal advice. Please seek a lawyer's advice for this issue.
/r/MensRights07/12/22 01:40 AM
1

It is considered rape because condoms help prevent STDs. Birth control doesn't protect against STDs.
/r/MensRights04/12/22 10:29 PM
5

I get your point, but maybe don't promote suicide?
/r/MensRights29/11/22 03:45 PM
-15

In AITA, they have an option for everyone being bad... That's my view here. Yes, I completely agree that it sucks that you had no say over being a father. I also agree that it was her body, so it was her choice to continue to raise the child. While the child is inside of her, it is her body to do with as she pleases. But that shouldn't have an impact on your, given your lack of consent to father a child. Given birth control, consent to sex is not consent to being a parent - a privilege given to …
/r/MensRights26/11/22 04:57 PM
–

This thread is amazing. OP, I am sorry to hear what you are going through. I hope you were able to connect with one of the people who volunteered. And I hope you recover and things improve. To the others: I am thoroughly impressed with people's willingness to help out a fellow person in a time of need. Kudos to you all.
/r/MensRights23/11/22 03:57 AM
6

I get it. Reading comprehension is tough. You missed out on some schooling or something. Let me explain it more simply. The person is upset because they feel like girls and boys are being treated differently. They don't like the double standard. As an example, they explained how they were not allowed to attend an event that was considered to be "for girls" because of their gender, while at the same time the girls were allowed to attend events that were "for boys". Many humans have an internal se…
/r/MensRights22/11/22 04:35 PM
–

Removed.
/r/MensRights21/11/22 03:04 PM
–

In this thread: OP can't distinguish between women and feminists.
/r/MensRights18/11/22 02:46 PM
-1

Wouldn't it be better to have dedicated messages for those other issues?
/r/MensRights12/11/22 03:20 AM
-16

I agree that it would be nice to have male victims included, but these are issues that should be addressed by society, too. I liked this commercial.
/r/MensRights11/11/22 02:47 PM
5

We don't get in trouble. Subreddits get in trouble when their moderators support and condone the actions of users to violate the rules of reddit. Reddit admins have left us alone for years because we, the moderators, ensure that the rules of reddit as a whole are followed here.
/r/MensRights10/11/22 11:03 PM
1

Talk to a lawyer.
/r/MensRights08/11/22 09:06 PM
2

The middle is the least likely to "hate on men". Conservatives are anti-abortion, forcing individuals (including fathers) to be parents. Conservatives are pro-circumcision, taking away genital integrity. Conservatives support male-only conscription. Conservatives support gender roles. Conservatives support traditional values, including "men don't cry" and other things that harm male psychology.
/r/MensRights07/11/22 12:13 AM
1

you are an idiot.
/r/MensRights06/11/22 05:43 AM
6

What the hell does being "liberal" have to do with this?
/r/MensRights06/11/22 02:59 AM
2

This is not a MGTOW subreddit.
/r/MensRights30/10/22 10:13 PM
–

As I said, this is not a subreddit to promote an anti-trans agenda. I read the article. It isn't relevant to this subreddit. I will not let this subreddit get devolved into religious conservativism.
/r/MensRights29/10/22 08:09 PM
–

This is not a subreddit to promote an anti-trans agenda.
/r/MensRights29/10/22 04:45 PM
–

This is not relevant to the subreddit.
/r/MensRights28/10/22 07:40 PM
14

I always walk away from these going "Damn..." Brilliant again.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/10/22 02:56 PM
1

The account you are responding to has been suspended. Makes my job easier! That being said, proxy violence
/r/MensRights23/10/22 09:00 PM
1

Why not just report the article? I removed it after someone reported your comment. Yeah, this is a trash post. I agree with you.
/r/MensRights21/10/22 09:59 PM
2

It was not obvious that it was the exact same advert. I will approve it.
/r/MensRights21/10/22 02:38 PM
1

Hi. This was not approved by moderators. You emailed us >1 year ago and received approval for something else. That is not a blanket approval.
/r/MensRights21/10/22 02:07 PM
–

Removed. Post a link to the actual source, not an image.
/r/MensRights21/10/22 02:03 PM
4

He doesn't excuse other people's attitudes, I see no reason to excuse his. It is hypocritical.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/10/22 03:21 AM
6

I like this sub, but man you really have a holier-than-thou attitude. I threw an olive branch, you could at least be polite.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/10/22 12:48 AM
10

a) That brings its own headaches. b) There have been a lot of bad actors throughout the years trying to get into a mod position on /r/MensRights. We don't get reliable applicants, so finding moderators is hard. c) We are still pro-free speech. We moderate posts under the argument that the posts must be topical. We have no such argument to use for the comments. d) Our modqueue is emptied multiple times a day. No large subreddit has the moderator staff to be able to read through all comments. The …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/10/22 02:50 PM
13

I agree. I like to frequent this sub, and I often enjoy the posts here more than /r/MensRights. But the larger base of /r/MensRights means it needs more people from here participating to prevent it from getting worse! Mods can't do all the work.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/10/22 12:44 AM
26

One of the biggest problems is that /r/MGTOW and /r/TheRedPill are defunct. So all those people thought they could come to /r/MensRights to talk about their bullshit. We try to keep the posts down, but we can't police the comments. Trashy communities spread their trash.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/10/22 12:42 AM
3

Mild extremism does sometimes, but for the most part the worst is not only downvoted but removed. In contrast, statements like "Kill all men" is celebrated in other circles.
/r/MensRights12/10/22 09:54 PM
2

Yeah, the data doesn't look great... but we can't tell the difference between new people and trolls. Suspicion exists, but isn't enough to act on.
/r/MensRights12/10/22 09:53 PM
1

A collection of websites and message boards where men collect to talk about issues affecting men.
/r/MensRights12/10/22 02:54 PM
2

I would agree with this statement.
/r/MensRights12/10/22 02:53 PM
3

I suspect you are correct. It got majorly downvoted and removed. As a moderator, I see the extreme things that are posted, and I remove them. Most people don't see the extremism that we deal with. Just because it isn't upvoted doesn't mean it doesn't exist.
/r/MensRights12/10/22 02:52 PM
1

It has long since been removed.
/r/MensRights12/10/22 02:51 PM
3

It has long since been removed.
/r/MensRights12/10/22 02:51 PM
1

Interesting strawman. My argument was not that the comments were supported, but rather that they exist. As a moderator of this subreddit, I see the things that exist. The extremism is there. It is also present on feminist subreddits, and I think it abhorrent. But I can't do anything about it there, and the article isn't about extremism there.
/r/MensRights12/10/22 02:51 PM
-64

That is a pretty bad strawman. "Men are trash, kill all men" is bad. So is "I want to kill you in front of your children", a quote that is apparently taken from /r/MensRights.
/r/MensRights12/10/22 05:07 AM
4

There are some valid points made in that paper. If people don't like it, then perhaps we shouldn't be tolerating it in our community. Of note, there wasn't that much talked about for /r/MensRights specifically. But we are definitely connected by user overlap with other, more extreme communities. It isn't a good thing.
/r/MensRights12/10/22 05:06 AM
5

If you have any evidence for sockpuppetry or anything else, feel free to report it and leave info in the report field explaining your evidence. Otherwise, anti-circumcision will remain a part of this subreddit. People should have a right to genital integrity. Half of the population has that in western societies, the other half deserves it, too.
/r/MensRights03/10/22 10:43 PM
9

Circumcision is a legitimate men's rights issue. It deserves to be discussed here.
/r/MensRights03/10/22 06:33 PM
1

Some places have health education that teaches these things. Some places are backwards conservative/religious shitholes.
/r/MensRights03/10/22 02:34 PM
7

What freaks? You called us here, but haven't made it clear who you think is a freak.
/r/MensRights02/10/22 07:34 PM
1

This presumes men had rights before feminism. Men have never had "all the rights" in the common narrative. It has always been a rights vs responsibility argument. Feminism is certainly making it worse, but it was already bad before feminism.
/r/MensRights27/09/22 05:44 PM
–

Andrew Tate is not a Men's Rights activist, and is not relevant to the subreddit.
/r/MensRights26/09/22 04:31 PM
3

Are you for real this stupid that you would think this low-upvoted post is attributed to everyone here?
/r/MensRights24/09/22 02:24 PM
1

Talk to a lawyer.
/r/MensRights21/09/22 05:55 PM
16

There have been some popularizers of men's rights issues, but The Tin Men has consistently been the one that aligns with my views about conveying the issues in a political-party-neutral, drama-neutral way. I know you see replies - please do keep it up. I think you are likely the most effective person/group at shifting the conversation.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/09/22 12:10 AM
–

If you see people encouraging rule breaking, report it or send us a message. We aren't banning women from this subreddit.
/r/MensRights17/09/22 10:09 PM
2

It has no place.
/r/MensRights17/09/22 10:08 PM
2

The consistency of posts across multiple subreddits over such a long time span? I don't see a reason to fake it.
/r/MensRights15/09/22 02:13 PM
3

Sounds about right...
/r/MensRights14/09/22 05:37 PM
10

That's the thing - the common perception of the traditionalist relationship is the man made the decisions, but that should change. THIS is just as accurate of a traditionalist relationship as one where the man makes the decisions. The PERSON who is most dominant doesn't depend on gender.
/r/MensRights14/09/22 05:36 PM
18

Women get bored with sex in a long term relationship: https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2019/02/women-get-bored-sex-long-term-relationships/582736/ Sexless relationships are not good: https://www.everydayhealth.com/sexual-health/are-sexless-marriages-and-relationships-normal.aspx Effects a sexless marriage can have on partners and the relationship: https://www.marriage.com/advice/physical-intimacy/sexless-marriage-effect/ Sexless marriages are grounds for constructive abandonment: https:…
/r/MensRights14/09/22 01:55 PM
6

By all means, individuals are free to do that. But not everyone here agrees with everything Peterson says, so it won't be a communal action.
/r/MensRights07/09/22 04:44 PM
0

Sounds about right... He even reported you for saying this.
/r/MensRights06/09/22 12:45 PM
0

I just have a higher expectation of users here. If you aren't smart enough to make coherent arguments, go elsewhere.
/r/MensRights02/09/22 06:43 PM
0

You sound like you belong in /r/MGTOW or /r/TheRedPill rather than on /r/MensRights.
/r/MensRights02/09/22 06:19 PM
-1

Global average is irrelevant here, because the OP was talking about a trait that is not shared globally. Make a coherent argument, and I won't criticize it. Make an irrational argument, and I will.
/r/MensRights02/09/22 03:38 PM
-1

I am glad you found a source that supports my argument. Thank you.
/r/MensRights02/09/22 01:16 PM
-1

But they do dominate this subreddit.
/r/MensRights02/09/22 01:16 PM
4

5'6" is pretty far off for the average height for men. https://www.healthline.com/health/average-height-for-men#u-s-height
/r/MensRights01/09/22 10:12 PM
2

This is really the only response necessary. Great job.
/r/MensRights28/08/22 01:22 PM
1

Just admit you were wrong, learn from your mistake and move on. And if I see you misusing reports again, you can take a break from the subreddit.
/r/MensRights17/08/22 06:12 AM
1

And I don't need someone filling up the mod queue with reports on something that was correcting your mistake.
/r/MensRights17/08/22 03:46 AM
-1

Don't get upset at the bot, it was just correcting you.
/r/MensRights17/08/22 01:35 AM
1

I am sorry to hear about your situation. But I think that your post is more appropriate for /r/daddit or something similar.
/r/MensRights16/08/22 08:58 PM
7

Men being forced to have sex is typically counted as sexual assault rather than rape.
/r/MensRights16/08/22 04:07 AM
7

Something we, as mods, are dealing with is the real possibility that it is foreign agents who are trying to push an agenda of racial and gender discontent in the USA. (Given that very few of the mods are actually American, it is interesting to say the least.)
/r/MensRights13/08/22 03:32 AM
12

That is not what he said.
/r/MensRights11/08/22 03:11 PM
3

I interpret the phrase "Happy wife, happy life" differently. I interpret it to only apply to some wives, for whom they will make their partner's lives miserable if they are not kept happy. It is basically a princess syndrome phrase.
/r/MensRights10/08/22 08:36 PM
5

You are incorrect. The MRM is for all people who identify as men, or formerly identified as men, who experience discrimination as a result of their gender.
/r/MensRights04/08/22 04:58 AM
3

This is a very common experience.
/r/MensRights02/08/22 04:29 PM
–

Your post was removed due to rule 7: No Reposts. Material that is substantially similar to something posted within the last three days counts as a repost. A post with new information about the same topic is not a repost. If similar posts are made within a few days of each other, the number of upvotes and comments will be taken into account when choosing which to remove. Moderators will use their discretion. No Fakes No Ads No posts about being banned from other subreddits. Nearly everyone here h…
/r/MensRights26/07/22 12:08 AM
3

No it isn't. You don't get to just make stuff up.
/r/MensRights25/07/22 11:51 AM
6

What kind of brain dead idiot thinks a gender was designed? Hundreds of millions of years ago when gender first evolved, no animal was like "I think these qualities will be correct for future species". That isn't how the universe works.
/r/MensRights24/07/22 03:09 PM
1

This post has been removed because: Rule 1: Submissions must be about men's rights issues. These should fall into one of these categories. Discrimination against men Issues that disproportionately affect men Problems that prevent men's issue being addressed Posts about other issues that have some relationship with men's rights should make it clear what that relationship is. These should be self-posts that explain the connection to men's rights.
/r/MensRights16/07/22 12:33 AM
1

This post has been removed because: Rule 1: Submissions must be about men's rights issues. These should fall into one of these categories. Discrimination against men Issues that disproportionately affect men Problems that prevent men's issue being addressed Posts about other issues that have some relationship with men's rights should make it clear what that relationship is. These should be self-posts that explain the connection to men's rights.
/r/MensRights13/07/22 03:02 PM
3

Victim blaming is not welcome here. Your post has been removed.
/r/MensRights13/07/22 09:29 AM
3

Nearly had my thumb broken over that when a bachalorette party walked into the bar I was at.
/r/MensRights03/07/22 04:07 PM
3

As a woman, you hear the women's perspective. You don't hear the men's perspective. How about the women who get pissed off because men don't buy them drinks? Etc. (Lots of examples of this type of thing that men experience.) The behaviour you are describing is entitlement. It is not a gendered behaviour, but its expression can appear gendered due to differences in experiences.
/r/MensRights03/07/22 08:39 AM
3

Was this a feminist or a woman? Not all women are feminist.
/r/MensRights30/06/22 10:35 AM
20

This is an opportunity to engage with someone to help change their mind. If you want to be an asshole and silence people who are looking grow, be my guest, but don't act like you aren't an asshole.
/r/MensRights20/06/22 03:58 AM
–

This post is about a discussion, and I think the discussion is valuable to have. I didn't read specifically that this post was anti-trans, so I won't be removing it. I have read some anecdotal stories about people in the LGBTQ communities that are starting to get frustrated with the social pressure to adopt an anti-male attitude.
/r/MensRights19/06/22 11:49 PM
2

Well, the linguistic part was not at all relevant as a counter point or even a contributing point to what I said. You said something unrelated. And you weren't "mansplaining" you were just adding something you thought was interesting to the conversation, whether I recognized the gendered root of "patronizing" or not. Why would you apologize for contributing something you thought was interesting to the conversation? Why should I be insulted or bothered by you engaging? The only reason I could be …
/r/MensRights11/06/22 09:43 PM
4

Interesting. Thanks for mansplaining that to me. ;)
/r/MensRights11/06/22 08:15 PM
74

There is a word for that: Patronizing. Mansplaining is an effort to insult a gender for an action that is not gendered.
/r/MensRights11/06/22 05:35 AM
1

This would make sense if alimony were only awarded where the person stayed home with kids. If it is a lifestyle choice, it shouldn't be the responsibility of the higher earning ex-partner to continue to pay for that lifestyle choice.
/r/MensRights02/06/22 10:41 PM
2

They are not mutually exclusive things. The argument wasn't whether he was the victim or she was the victim, but was about defamation. BOTH parties could commit defamation at the same time.
/r/MensRights01/06/22 08:24 PM
0

whine
/r/MensRights24/05/22 01:28 PM
1

Ideas should be judged on merit and argument, not on historical standards.
/r/MensRights17/05/22 10:34 PM
2

Really? That is a really lame argument. "Someone at some time thought these ideas were sane, thus people who have changed their views are the extremists." Paraphrased, but that is at least what it sounds like you said.
/r/MensRights17/05/22 04:53 PM
1

?
/r/MensRights17/05/22 03:35 PM
–

This post doesn't have content. It is removed.
/r/MensRights17/05/22 01:44 PM
–

Note: The artist of this comic is quite controversial. There are claims that they have antisemitic and white nationalistic views. There have been many reports of the comic. That being said, the reason this is not being removed is because the content of this comic strip is relevant to this subreddit, and this strip does not contain any such views.
/r/MensRights17/05/22 12:33 PM
–

Removed for lack of content, and also the high risk of doxxing.
/r/MensRights16/05/22 03:16 PM
4

This is great news!
/r/MensRights15/05/22 08:03 PM
2

bahahahaha wow. Lay off the Kool-aid.
/r/MensRights15/05/22 04:55 AM
2

Are you joking? I can't believe someone would make such a claim genuinely... A story can be whatever the author wants it to be. Just because you would write it differently, doesn't mean anything. Hell, the Matrix must be true because if it were just a story, it would have been made better! Proof!
/r/MensRights13/05/22 08:22 PM
2

Well you may have me on a technicality about what is defined as a fairy tale. Doesn't change the fictional nature of the story.
/r/MensRights13/05/22 02:45 AM
0

Stories and fairy tales aren't really good justification for modern laws.
/r/MensRights12/05/22 01:42 PM
–

This person was not an MRA specifically. Thus, his passing is not relevant to this subreddit.
/r/MensRights10/05/22 03:20 PM
9

Mutual violence is very common. There were clearly problems on both sides. That supports Depp's argument - she defamed him by making herself seem like a victim of abuse. She wasn't a victim of abuse, she was abusive herself. That isn't victimhood.
/r/MensRights29/04/22 03:54 PM
–

Post need to have an informative title. Feel free to repost with a title that is not about your personal emotion, but rather about what people can expect to be engaged with if they click on the link.
/r/MensRights22/04/22 01:34 PM
–

Removed for disinformation.
/r/MensRights13/04/22 02:05 PM
–

This is an advertisement for a politician, not a post with any content. Feel free to repost when you have actual content.
/r/MensRights12/04/22 04:08 AM
1

I do not. That is not my role as moderator of this subreddit. You will need to find your own places.
/r/MensRights08/04/22 06:33 PM
2

Somewhere else. Reddit is a way of sorting things by topic, not by community. If you want to post things on a topic, find the appropriate topical subreddit. If you can't find one, or if that subreddit has been banned, it is because the moderators haven't adhered to the rules of reddit.
/r/MensRights08/04/22 05:52 PM
–

Removed. You don't understand divorce law at all. Having a discussion about things that aren't true isn't useful.
/r/MensRights02/04/22 02:20 PM
39

So close to being well written until it a) blames the issue on white imperialism, as if non-white men didn't experience this also, and b) fails to recognize that "creepy men" is a consequence of this, so women wouldn't need that armour if they didn't treat men that way and men had some reasonable socialization with women starting at a young age.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/04/22 02:05 PM
1

Consult a lawyer, not people on the internet.
/r/MensRights31/03/22 03:44 AM
4

It is useful on reddit to have multiple accounts. That way people can't use ad-hominem attacks against me for my participation in other subreddits. Note: Do NOT use your other accounts to vote on posts by any of your accounts, and DON'T use your other accounts to stack up votes on any posts you like/dislike. Reddit isn't opposed to multiple accounts, but they do take a hard line at vote manipulation from using multiple accounts. I try not to even visit the same subreddits with my different accou…
/r/MensRights30/03/22 02:34 PM
1

Think about it this way: If an article says someone's name and that someone sues the publisher, so be it. They won't sue people who simply link to that article. If someone else posts their name on a site like reddit, reddit can be sued. Reddit doesn't want to be sued.
/r/MensRights29/03/22 04:41 PM
3

People don't want fair. They lack power and so they attack people in power under the assumption that the power is being misused.
/r/MensRights29/03/22 04:39 PM
–

Meta discussions belong in /r/mensrightsmeta.
/r/MensRights29/03/22 04:37 PM
1

Well, actually 67% men, 33% women. https://www.statista.com/statistics/828906/number-of-stem-degrees-awarded-in-the-us-by-gender/
/r/MensRights12/03/22 03:15 PM
3

You didn't really provide any citations, you just made claims. Providing citations really helps strengthen the arguments made.
/r/MensRights08/03/22 04:00 PM
-4

But that is kind of the point... Demonstrate that you understand what other people know/believe and why, as a framework for developing critical thinking skills. They aren't telling you what to believe, they are telling you what they believe.
/r/MensRights08/03/22 03:59 PM
0

There is a lot of very questionable material being posted these days, especially anti-minority, anti-women. There are similarities between user account names frequently, too, indicating that this is either the effort of a single individual or else a group intent on pushing an agenda. The post you are replying to is deleted.
/r/MensRights07/03/22 10:40 PM
–

No one "deserves" love. This is not a rights issue. This is an ignorant human posting on an internet forum.
/r/MensRights03/03/22 05:43 PM
14

That's a load of bullshit. You aren't here to learn from other people, you are here to disagree with other people and make yourself feel self-righteous. You can claim otherwise, but your actions speak loud and clear.
/r/MensRights03/03/22 05:41 PM
12

Feel free to find a group of people who agree with you then.
/r/MensRights03/03/22 05:27 PM
19

You are projecting. No one said feminism is responsible for this. I said feminism is okay with this.
/r/MensRights03/03/22 03:11 PM
14

The definition of feminism that is practiced by most feminists.
/r/MensRights03/03/22 03:10 PM
–

Just to be clear: There is concern about Russian propaganda. This is in no way supportive of Russia's invasion of Ukraine. This is a legitimate men's rights issue as this is a very clear way in which men and women are treated differently in society. Contrasting views: Traditionalism is okay with this because it is the traditional view that reinforces gender stereotypes and gender roles. Most of Feminism is okay with this because women are not being forced to risk their lives. It is hypocritical …
/r/MensRights02/03/22 10:56 PM
2

There is a difference between the law as it is written and the law as it is applied. There are a few cases of laws-as-they-are-written being sexist, but these laws don't exist in every country. The big ones: Circumcision is not illegal but FGM is (most countries); selective service is for men (USA); rape requires penetration making sex-without-consent a significantly lower consequence for women than for men (this is changing, but US and UK had this on the books for a while). The differential app…
/r/MensRights17/02/22 04:07 PM
3

That's a pretty stupid comparison. You are basically saying that the only purpose of a tool is for house maintenance. I just spent the pandemic building a house. I enjoyed every minute of it. I didn't get paid for it. I know the people who live there now and they are in a much better place now that they have a home. I also enjoy woodworking - I made most of my Christmas gifts and people really enjoyed them.
/r/MensRights26/01/22 01:08 AM
12

Feminism isn't a movement for women's rights. Feminism is an ideological interpretation of why women are lacking rights. I disagree with that ideology, thus, I cannot support feminism. Women's rights activism and feminism could be completely separated without any impact on either of them. They aren't anywhere in the world, but they could be.
/r/MensRights25/01/22 06:39 PM
57

I support egalitarianism in all countries. That means I am more concerned with women's issues in countries where women's issues are less addressed, and vice versa.
/r/MensRights25/01/22 06:21 PM
39

Most dads who get tools also enjoy doing things with those tools.
/r/MensRights25/01/22 05:59 PM
2

Way to be a hypocrite. Your demeaning language is fine, but mine is bad. You have drunk the kool-aid so much that you can't see that the patriarchy is dead, and you have become the very thing you rail against.
/r/MensRights25/01/22 02:03 PM
1

It's extremely obvious you and I disagree. I provided some argument, you made a statement. The issue is that you are supporting yourself with your feelings. Congratulations, you are part of the problem.
/r/MensRights25/01/22 06:05 AM
1

Only a lawyer can answer your question. This is not a legal subreddit.
/r/MensRights24/01/22 04:43 PM
3

Yeah, the beauty standard is set by women, not men. The evidence is in things like matchmaking data, where women rate men as average attractiveness of 4/10, while men rate women as average attractiveness of 7/10. Men find women in ALL variations attractive. Overweight, underweight, short, tall, muscular, slim, it doesn't matter. Women are the gate keepers of attractiveness and make it very clear that they are. Nice try, though.
/r/MensRights24/01/22 03:46 PM
1

Lawyers can help you with this, not keyboard warriors on the internet. Get a lawyer.
/r/MensRights13/01/22 11:23 PM
2

This is one of my favourites yet. This one has a very powerful message. Thank you for making it!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/01/22 03:59 PM
8

"How can a woman be held accountable for criminal actions while men aren't being held accountable for things that are unethical but aren't technically illegal?" I agree that the things Ellen Pao mentioned should be included in laws, should be criminally prosecuted. But that isn't how the legal system works. Judges don't make laws.
/r/MensRights05/01/22 02:11 PM
-3

You don't get to hide behind language gymnastics. And reporting statements by a moderator isn't going to get you anywhere.
/r/MensRights03/01/22 10:54 PM
1

People post trash periodically. We can't stop it from being posted, but we can remove it. Just report and move on.
/r/MensRights02/01/22 03:52 PM
1

MGTOW was banned due to the behaviour of the participants and moderators. FDS remains because they don't cross those lines. The problem is that most people don't understand how reddit works and thinks that these issues are ideological in nature. Ideology certainly results in some groups being given fewer "chances" than others, but it isn't the reason for bannings.
/r/MensRights29/12/21 07:21 AM
2

I do not believe that a single woman actually has any sort of love for any man. Not a statement of hatred. Simply a statement of belief about whether women (yes, all women in this case) have actual love for men. Clearly this is an individual who has been hurt before. Women might love things that a man could provide or provides for her, but the woman doesn't actually love that man as a human being. Does not say ALL women. But this is really saying a lot. If this is this person's experience with w…
/r/MensRights18/12/21 09:36 PM
1

So if someone says "Men are such pigs" they are referring to all men, everywhere, including their father, grandfather, brother(s), sons? Your garbage is just as bad.
/r/MensRights18/12/21 03:30 PM
1

There are idiots everywhere in the world. Fortunately, forums exist where people can try to educate others on alternative perspectives.
/r/MensRights18/12/21 03:19 PM
2

The first one isn't hatred for women. It is a person sharing a feeling of how they feel women view men in society. Stop being such a snowflake assuming that if a person doesn't think that women are, on average, perfect individuals, sugar, spice and everything nice then they must hate women.
/r/MensRights18/12/21 03:17 PM
0

Agreed. There is a subset of users here who have been pushing this perspective lately, and I can't help but feel that it is a concerted effort. This perspective is new to this subreddit. I keep having to remove bullshit like this. I think I might have to start banning the users.
/r/MensRights12/12/21 03:54 PM
2

The men's rights issue involved has plenty of other instances that can be used to support it. This is not one of those. This subreddit isn't being policed by women. You are just a fucking nut job.
/r/MensRights04/12/21 09:32 PM
4

Yes, mandatory paternity testing would be fair. I completely agree. But this is NOT the argument to make for it.
/r/MensRights04/12/21 01:38 PM
–

I am sorry, but implying that a woman should disclose paternity under threat of possible death is fucking ridiculous. That is not framed as a men's rights issue.
/r/MensRights04/12/21 12:04 PM
4

Don't want to gestate a child for 9 months? Don't have sex! Easy as that. If you are reckless with your choice, then deal with the consequences. If you find that offensive, then you understand why we find the reverse gender version offensive.
/r/MensRights24/11/21 04:09 PM
6

Same argument could be said to women to take away abortion rights.
/r/MensRights24/11/21 02:18 PM
–

This post has been removed. The title does not match the content of the link it goes to.
/r/MensRights11/11/21 05:57 PM
18

Nope, this is fine. You are a mod here for a reason.
/r/MensRights10/11/21 04:55 PM
1

Thanks, slo-bro. That is irrelevant.
/r/MensRights23/10/21 12:40 PM
–

This post has been removed. The website is known for posting false claims and misinformation. While I have verified that the story in the article did happen, this website is not welcome on this subreddit.
/r/MensRights22/10/21 07:50 PM
–

Old news.
/r/MensRights21/10/21 11:41 PM
1

People on the internet aren't the right ones to help you. Maybe get a friend to pick up your dog. You are at risk of being arrested if things go wrong, so don't risk things going wrong.
/r/MensRights21/10/21 09:07 PM
14

In my experience, it is women commenting on other women, or women commenting on their own bodies in anticipation of what they think men think.
/r/MensRights16/10/21 01:46 PM
1

Thanks, slowbro.
/r/MensRights15/10/21 02:07 PM
–

Removed. Anti-vax issues will not be tolerated.
/r/MensRights10/10/21 07:15 PM
–

Subject does not match the claim in the article. Removed for falsifying the subject.
/r/MensRights10/10/21 02:06 PM
1

Threats are different than just expressing hatred. If you can't understand that, you don't belong here.
/r/MensRights08/10/21 11:12 PM
0

Congratulations. You have established your maturity level as "Child".
/r/MensRights08/10/21 09:40 PM
-1

Removed. Your title has a falsehood in it. It says "Proven innocent... due to lack of evidence." Lack of evidence isn't proof of innocence. It just means there is a failure to convict. If you can't understand that...
/r/MensRights08/10/21 07:46 PM
2

Check /r/MensRightsLinks
/r/MensRights07/10/21 12:10 AM
–

The title is not informative. If you think it is worth reading, then it clearly is worth typing out an explanation of why it is worth reading.
/r/MensRights06/10/21 05:01 PM
2

You aren't going to be a lawyer if you can't learn to communicate better. She will face the consequences of her actions by you moving on without her.
/r/MensRights06/10/21 02:33 PM
1

A researcher who doesn't focus on suicide research is not sweeping suicide research aside. They are just focusing on their own research. It is pretty naive of you to imply there is a conspiracy ("swept aside" is a statement of intentionality) against suicide research.
/r/MensRights05/10/21 02:38 PM
3

Because this subreddit has a stronger free speech policy than other subreddits (especially gender subreddits) and so there are legitimately angry, spiteful, stupid things that people post and it doesn't get removed. Someone who wants to make this subreddit look bad just simply needs to find those and point them out. For someone who isn't willing to read the rest of the subreddit, all they see is the idiots.
/r/MensRights01/10/21 12:49 PM
2

I don't think there is one perfect solution to this. I am fine if she doesn't take my last name. Hyphenation just passes on the problem to your child, because you can only hyphenate so many times before it becomes unmanageable. Having daughters take mother's surname and sons take father's surname is something I like, but it is pretty gender binary. (Of course, trans individuals could change their last name when changing their gender.) Creating a new last name for the married couple just adds hea…
/r/MensRights30/09/21 09:04 PM
5

Alright, if that is how you feel, then maybe stop complaining about the anti-abortion law in Texas? Women should be held accountable for their mistakes, too, right? The reality is that life just isn't that simple.
/r/MensRights29/09/21 05:20 PM
1

Talk to a lawyer, not people on the internet.
/r/MensRights28/09/21 03:22 PM
1

Since that point was never made and you are arguing against yourself, I leave you to your self-argument.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/09/21 09:05 PM
–

This is material for pussypassdenied or some other similar subreddit.
/r/MensRights27/09/21 03:13 PM
1

A single woman was caught doing this. Your title is misleading.
/r/MensRights26/09/21 04:33 PM
1

What I am saying is that parental surrender is NOT the same thing as abortion. Parental surrender is more similar to giving a child up for adoption.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/09/21 11:33 PM
1

There are still very serious health risks for women. While they may have reproductive choices, they also carry the majority of the risk associated with pregnancy. This is a complicated situation, and I think too many people over simplify it. I am in favour of parental surrender, but it just isn't this simple.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/09/21 11:20 PM
4

They actually have a decent point. This is a part of the Legal Paternal Surrender argument that isn't discussed in the MRM. Women do have a disproportionate responsibility to carry the child to term. It also carries a risk to their health. This is why abortion is solely within the woman's choice. Legal Paternal Surrender only works in a system that has enough social support to provide for the child without solely burdening the sole remaining parent. And it should be gender neutral - so Legal Par…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/09/21 05:38 PM
–

This subreddit is not subject to your personal whims. The problem is that you have assumptions and haven't bothered reading anything here. Unlike feminist-leaning subreddits, we don't ban people for their ideology. That is why people who identify as incel and MGTOW are here. Same reason why some feminists are here. We aren't an insular circle-jerk (hint: Like feminist groups are). Every time a poll is done on this subreddit, the political results come out fairly split, with a small majority lean…
/r/MensRights20/09/21 06:38 PM
13

You have a really great way of wording these messages and are able to communicate in a way that I wish I could. If there were more people like you in the MRM and fewer of the angry, extremist stereotypes, I feel like we might actually be able to effectively get our message across. Great job and please do keep up the great work.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/09/21 01:53 PM
0

Because women have intrinsic value to society by being able to give birth. So society doesn't expect women to work on themselves. Men need to work on themselves to be worthy of having a partner who is willing to carry their child. Or at least that is the classic pseudoscience-evo-psych explanation. The reality is that it is just simply socially acceptable to tell guys to work on themselves, but less so to tell women that. I also think women are more willing to stand up to that kind of abusive co…
/r/MensRights20/09/21 01:45 PM
0

This was theatre. Read closer.
/r/MensRights16/09/21 07:02 PM
5

In my experience... Men encourage other men to suppress expressions of emotion in public, but allow it just fine in private. Men are very supportive of other men and their emotions. Women encourage other men to express (some of) their emotions in public, because that is socially expected of them and they are safe with public around. Women expect men to suppress their emotions in private, and will judge and reject men who show too much emotion in private.
/r/MensRights16/09/21 01:21 PM
1

Sarcasm?
/r/MensRights14/09/21 07:55 PM
1

If there is evidence or witnesses, that is sexual assault. Groping is different from slapping, light touching or anything else. Flat out sexual assault, and the full consequences appropriate for his age.
/r/MensRights12/09/21 02:35 PM
1

Women's tennis and rock climbing is more enjoyable than men's quite often. There is more technique and strategy applied, where as the men's versions just tend to be more about strength.
/r/MensRights07/09/21 08:11 PM
1

There is nothing you can do about informal accusations made among "friends". If it becomes a legal issue, get a lawyer. There are no alternatives.
/r/MensRights02/09/21 06:57 PM
3

In my experience, the whole "buck up, men don't cry" is the argument given to someone AFTER they have emotionally vented. It is encouragement to show a strong face to prevent discrimination by women who judge them negatively for not being strong. My male acquaintances, friends and family have always been emotionally supportive. Female acquaintances, friends and family, other than my mother, have been more judgmental.
/r/MensRights02/09/21 03:36 PM
4

damn loads of hate around here, im just agreeing with the post and now that i gave proof this is the response🤦. Yes you did. Exact quote.
/r/MensRights01/09/21 04:46 PM
8

There aren't "loads of hate", you are just a very sensitive person. One bad post out of hundreds and you focus on the bad.
/r/MensRights01/09/21 03:10 PM
4

"unmoderated unpleasantness" - I think you mean "not yet moderated unpleasantness". With 9k subscribers, you still have a small, core group that are like minded and haven't attracted the trolls and attention of the feminist anti-/r/MensRights groups. You also don't have the sway of /r/MensRights, so you don't get the tradcons and other extreme right trying to use it to exert their influence.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/09/21 03:09 PM
1

Really? That's a dumb question. We allow people with differing political viewpoints to participate. That is how we don't take a political side.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/09/21 03:07 PM
13

That comment actually violates our rules against promoting violence, and the user has now been banned. Instead of helping with moderation, you just sit back and complain. 300k subscribers - we are WAY more popular than /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates, and that means there are a lot more posts from the trailing end of the distribution. You can either report the posts you see that violate the rules, or sit on your throne pretending you are the king shit because you notice bad things but don't actually do…
/r/MensRights01/09/21 01:54 PM
-9

"not well" is a description of quality rather than intention. Your words are criticism, not description.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/09/21 01:50 PM
0

Your biased observations in which you are outraged at the right wing posts, and quietly move on past the left wing posts.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/09/21 01:30 PM
3

That is not even remotely true. /r/MensRights is trying to be politically neutral. TradCons get banned and their posts removed all the time when it isn't relevant to men's rights. It is bloody f*ing obvious what the difference is: /r/MensRights is politically neutral, and /r/leftwingmaleadvocates is politically left. That is it. One makes a political stance, the other does not. It doesn't make you superior.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/09/21 01:28 PM
-10

Moderating 300k is a lot different than moderating 9k. Maybe have some experience with these things before you criticize.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/09/21 01:26 PM
1

No one is suppressing anything. Again, THIS ISN'T A CONSPIRACY AGAINST YOU. Stats are available to mods who can share it with whomever they want. The most likely explanation is that traffic requests are a heavy database load, and making it accessible to the public opens it up to the API, which could burden the servers unnecessarily.
/r/MensRights31/08/21 04:13 AM
1

The subreddit stats being public was taken away from all subs, not just this one. Not everything is a conspiracy against you.
/r/MensRights30/08/21 12:08 PM
1

Those are our normal numbers. We have never had much higher. The only times we have higher is when something controversial happens, like the Plymouth shooter. Then people rush here for the drama, and the mods clean things up until it goes back to normal. People who don't know what they are talking about should ask questions rather than make assertions. You have no data, only your perceptions and feelings. I have data. Lots of it.
/r/MensRights30/08/21 04:09 AM
3

I guess they took away the ability to make it public, then. Here you go - the important stats of subscribers by day and pageviews by month. Both show that we are growing. https://imgur.com/a/KK3hoba By the way, the correlation between subscribes and unsubscribes suggests that it is based on people hitting subscribe and then changing their mind, rather than long-term subscribers deciding to unsubscribe.
/r/MensRights29/08/21 12:22 PM
–

OP doesn't know what he is talking about. I am pretty sure the traffic stats have been set to public, so everyone can see it. This link might work: https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/about/traffic/ There are definitely fluctuations, but we have been holding steady for the past year, if not increasing in traffic a little bit.
/r/MensRights29/08/21 04:19 AM
-1

Couples make joint decisions and are responsible for the decisions made while coupled. One of those decisions may be that one person stays home with kids, for example. This has a negative impact on their career and income. If the couple stays together, the other partner's income will be the compensation. If the couple splits, it is unfair for that burden to be held entirely by the one partner. The problem is the extremities of alimony and the duration of alimony, not the concept of alimony. It a…
/r/MensRights26/08/21 06:29 PM
1

And this post is removed because it has nothing to do with men's rights.
/r/MensRights22/08/21 10:31 PM
2

That is an interesting point about political hate... I still think, though, that we need more clear language. The two connotations of "hate" are too easy to confuse.
/r/MensRights22/08/21 10:09 PM
6

We do ban misogynists.
/r/MensRights22/08/21 04:33 PM
–

TwoX is not specifically feminist. It is women. If you can't tell the difference between a feminist and a woman, you are kinda an idiot.
/r/MensRights22/08/21 04:57 AM
0

You need help. Seek professional psychiatric help.
/r/MensRights20/08/21 10:40 PM
-2

You know, it is fucking cringy when you say "females" like that. You sound like an idiotic Ferengi.
/r/MensRights20/08/21 12:51 PM
1

Good for you. Radical means drastically different than the norm. MGTOW is radical because it is drastically different from the norm.
/r/MensRights16/08/21 11:56 PM
-1

Here is your eli5: When couples have children, they sometimes make the choice to have one person stay at home to take care of those kids. That is a JOINT decision that both people must take responsibility for. The consequence is that it has a negative effect on the ability for one person to earn money and a positive impact on the other person’s. Alimony is designed to equalize the effect of that JOINT decision. I am anti-alimony when it is too large or when there are no kids involved. But in pri…
/r/MensRights16/08/21 01:09 PM
7

Admins can see it anyways. Nothing is ever deleted, just hidden. Direct links to it would still work.
/r/MensRights16/08/21 01:14 AM
0

Resolved by advocating for greater attention to men’s mental health. That is something that happens here.
/r/MensRights15/08/21 09:28 PM
–

This post was reportedly made by the Plymouth Shooter. The moderators of this subreddit view his behaviour as reprehensible and atrocious. This person probably used a super market, corner store, email, and many other websites. He probably used Amazon to order things. His use of those services does not indicate that they radicalized him or encouraged him to participate in his atrocious act. That applies here as well. I do not believe in covering up history, and I will not be removing this post. I…
/r/MensRights15/08/21 02:31 PM
-5

Human history is comprised of men and women coupling and having children. MGTOW encourages men to not take part in this. That is radical.
/r/MensRights15/08/21 01:53 PM
11

I am not the moderator of a feminist space. If I were, comments like "Kill all men" would be treated with a permanent ban.
/r/MensRights15/08/21 01:52 PM
3

No. I used the correct term.
/r/MensRights15/08/21 04:00 AM
18

We don’t ban for beliefs, we ban for actions.
/r/MensRights14/08/21 11:29 PM
11

I never meant to imply they are the same ideology. However, they are both radical in that they are drastically different from any other ideology. Men's Rights is less of an ideology than a concept, and it shares many similar properties to some of the central ideas of feminism. It isn't radical, but it isn't as popular as feminism.
/r/MensRights14/08/21 07:46 PM
19

There are plenty of articles and posts around that detail the deliberate actions taken by feminists that harm the rights of men in the name of feminism. Just like /r/Atheism will criticize any given religion, we will criticize feminism. If MGTOW or Incel ideologies were to harm the rights of men, then those discussions would be allowed also. Right now, they aren't. That doesn't mean they are aligned with us, just unrelated.
/r/MensRights14/08/21 07:25 PM
-3

No. MGTOW will need to figure their own way out of their situation.
/r/MensRights14/08/21 07:23 PM
–

Report the posts you see. I am trying to keep up but there is a lot to deal with.
/r/MensRights04/08/21 08:28 PM
1

I think you misunderstood me. The admins will certainly come down harder on a group that breaks a rule due to ideological differences. They have made that abundantly clear with their actions. But rule breaking has to occur.
/r/MensRights04/08/21 04:19 PM
–

This is very unlikely to be due to ideological reasons. Subreddits are banned when mods refuse to follow the rules of reddit in general. We all like to think this is ideological, but /r/MensRights is still around because we follow the rules and remove users who do not. It gets harder and harder when places like this get banned, though, because the idiotic users who acted in a way to get that subreddit banned start coming here thinking they can act like idiots all over again. We take a no toleran…
/r/MensRights03/08/21 10:50 PM
–

Removed. Widely uninformed article. Men's rights from around the world are discussed here. For race issues in the US, it is widely talked about how black men experience an intersectional challenge from race plus gender.
/r/MensRights21/07/21 03:20 PM
–

You harassed someone at work and were punished. End of story. Not a men's rights issue. If you have problems with coworkers, take it to HR and complain.
/r/MensRights13/07/21 11:10 PM
5

If you gender rape, then it appears as a fact. If you ungender rape, then it isn't. For example, if I defined all X as people wearing lipstick doing something horrible, should I be surprised when the statistics show it is mostly women who are guilty of X? No. Well, most of the world requires penetration, sometimes explicitly but often just in how the rule is applied, for rape. Since women don't have an easy way to penetrate someone, it is not surprising that that definition of rape results in mo…
/r/MensRights10/07/21 02:16 PM
10

Feminists instigated the Duluth Movement which says that any violence committed by women is in self defence, and justified. If a woman commits violence, it is the male that should be jailed for causing her to commit that violence. If that isn't gendered, then you are a psycho.
/r/MensRights10/07/21 02:13 PM
7

"Studies show..." Prove it. And yes, you invaded our space, called into question our beliefs, and then you say "woah, I am a poor victim, don't be mad at me"... Give me a break. You are so inundated with feminist ideology that you are denying men their feelings. Great job at being anti-male.
/r/MensRights10/07/21 02:12 PM
10

Ask your feminist friends what they think of male circumcision. If they aren't as vehemently against it as they are female circumcision, then you have an example of a double standard.
/r/MensRights10/07/21 02:10 PM
7

I would be surprised if that were actually true. More likely, as was the case for the feminist spaces I was part of before leaving, is that I was conditioned to think of the anti-male rhetoric as justified and reasonable, and so it wasn't "man hating".
/r/MensRights10/07/21 02:09 PM
1

Your source does not provide any indication where the data comes from.
/r/MensRights09/07/21 05:01 PM
–

Removed. You don't seem to understand what trolling is.
/r/MensRights09/07/21 04:59 PM
5

Wow, you are pretty racist, eh? That's rough. I understand, though. As a male, I am subject to a lot of hate. So while I am not muslim, I understand what it must be like to be vilified in Western media and by Western people. Perhaps you should talk to a psychiatrist? They are actually working more on finding out how your personality type works. I was just reading an article about it. You might be interested: https://www.psypost.org/2020/12/researchers-identify-a-new-personality-construct-that-de…
/r/MensRights04/07/21 06:30 PM
1

They aren't allowed to keep it. They can see it and review it in the classroom and then they have to give it back.
/r/MensRights30/06/21 01:46 PM
1

Not everyone lives in the US.
/r/MensRights30/06/21 03:38 AM
1

No. Don't be ignorant.
/r/MensRights29/06/21 08:21 PM
2

I had something similar happen to me, though clearly not as devastating or damaging. My son brought home a test from school that was marked incorrectly. I am very knowledgable in the subject matter, and the answers were easily verified with an internet search. I wrote a letter to the principal explaining the problems with the grading and linking to Wikipedia or other sufficiently-reputable sites (it is grade school afterall, and this was not an opinion based subject). The result was silence exce…
/r/MensRights29/06/21 08:18 PM
1

Talk to a lawyer. This is not a legal subreddit.
/r/MensRights29/06/21 04:04 PM
-2

We hear a lot of horror stories, but child support abuse isn't necessarily that common. Having a separate account like this could potentially lead to a lot of financial abuse/control that wouldn't be in the benefit of the child. The better perspective to take is that custody should be default split, and child support should be unnecessary in such situations.
/r/MensRights28/06/21 07:56 PM
1

Talk to a lawyer, not people on the internet.
/r/MensRights22/06/21 05:33 AM
1

Talk to a lawyer, not people on the internet.
/r/MensRights22/06/21 02:36 AM
1

Specifically transgender issues are better discussed in a transgender subreddit. Transgender issues that are related to issues with being seen as society as male are welcome here. There is definitely a lot of overlap, and so trans issues aren't automatically removed simply because they are trans. And the subreddit isn't anti-trans. But we work hard to keep the subreddit topically related. Examples might be: Difficulty transitioning? Not relevant, as it is a trans issue only. MtF treated poorly b…
/r/MensRights18/06/21 01:40 PM
0

Some idiot reported your comment. The sad reality is that some people want the education system to teach the things they believe in, regardless of their usefulness or truthfulness. This does work on both sides of the political spectrum, however. It is just that, so far, the worst of it in terms of anti-science/creationism has come from right-wing oriented individuals. It isn't so much their right-wing-ness, but rather the other beliefs that are common in that community.
/r/MensRights16/06/21 05:16 PM
–

Cross posting these things with gender changes to the title is becoming a little low-hanging-fruit. How about instead of just cross posting, you go through and give a male's perspective equivalent post, and then link to the cross post at the end?
/r/MensRights15/06/21 04:44 PM
1

You need to talk to a lawyer, not people on the internet.
/r/MensRights10/06/21 05:58 AM
1

Duluth Model
/r/MensRights08/06/21 08:06 PM
–

Nothing in the article mentions fathers. This is a tragedy, but not specifically a men's rights issue.
/r/MensRights08/06/21 02:06 PM
0

We have an obligation, as mods, to protect the subreddit. You don't fucking joke about killing jewish people. If you were serious about the comment, you do not belong on the subreddit. If you were joking about the comment, you are not intelligent enough to post on the subreddit because you risk the subreddits existence. Until you grow up a lot, you are not welcome on /r/MensRights.
/r/AntiFeminists04/06/21 02:43 PM
0

Let me leave this with you: I am arguing for logic and reason, not hyperbole and emotion. Don't be like them. Be better.
/r/MensRights01/06/21 07:20 PM
-5

Wow, the kind of retarded logical leaps that some people take... First off, I am a moderator here. To say I don't care about men is fucking ridiculous. Secondly, the person said "MOST of what feminists say", emphasis mine, and I disagreed with the "MOST" part of it. As I said, many feminists go too far. That would suggest I am in agreement with the view that some feminists are bad. But it is categorically false that MOST of what feminists say is like something Hitler would say.
/r/MensRights01/06/21 07:06 PM
-14

Not even remotely true, but you can mischaracterize them all you want to try to make yourself feel better about your beliefs. "We want women to have equality in the workplace!" is nothing like anything Hitler would say, no matter if you replace gender with race. Many feminists go too far, and there is no internal policing in the ideology. But to say what you did and genuinely mean/think it is a gross mischaracterization that reeks of an attempt to deal with your own cognitive dissonance.
/r/MensRights01/06/21 04:16 PM
4

Its like calling feminists feminazis. It is an effective insult that gets people upset.
/r/MensRights01/06/21 01:22 PM
1

Men rarely feel comfortable/safe showing emotion around someone who isn't a close trusted individual because of bullying. Parents and close friends. Most men have more male friends than female friends. Thus, men share their emotions around other men more comfortably than they share their emotion around women. The bullying about emotion showing happens just as frequently from women. However, the difference is that boy-boy bullying happens for a spectrum of reasons, where are girl-boy bullying hap…
/r/MensRights19/05/21 06:59 PM
0

You stating something is a fact doesn't make it a fact. Stop using the word fact, you just make yourself sound unintelligent. I am trying to help you.
/r/MensRights19/05/21 02:52 PM
2

Instead of expressing your feelings, you could go... build a fence, dig a hole, do some yard work, etc. These are all ways of processing emotions productively. This is something men teach themselves to do because it allows us to process our emotions without negative social feedback.
/r/MensRights19/05/21 02:51 PM
1

Stoicism is used when you want to communicate an emotion calmly, for discussion. Outburst is used when you want attention for your emotion. This is a gender neutral description. In my experience, women are taught (often implicitly) to use outburst because people respond to their emotions positively, to help them. Men are taught (often implicitly) to use stoicism because people respond to their emotions negatively, to chastise them. In a discussion with a group of friends, including a bunch of wo…
/r/MensRights19/05/21 02:48 PM
1

Men already know that they can. Men cry around other men all the time. Men don't cry around women. The issue isn't telling men that they are allowed to cry, the issue is telling women not to judge men for crying.
/r/MensRights19/05/21 02:42 PM
2

People do express their emotions. They express them in ways that are different from how women express their emotions. Check out "Self Made Man", a documentary about a woman who disguised herself as a man and experienced life as a man to contrast it to life as a woman. It was different. But it wasn't what she thought it was. Stop telling men how to have feelings and how to express them.
/r/MensRights19/05/21 05:32 AM
1

You "what if's" are not counter arguments. They are nuances. It doesn't change the fact that my statement describes why there is a legal difference.
/r/MensRights02/05/21 02:41 PM
25

Pregnancy isn't the only reason people wear condoms. They significantly reduce STD transmission. While there is a similarity in the birth control aspect, they are not comparable in the STD transmission aspect. As a result, the analogy isn't complete. I agree that lying about being on birth control, from any gender's perspective, is wrong and should have consequences.
/r/MensRights02/05/21 05:52 AM
4

As a cat owner, my experience is that female cats are more often cat-cats, and male cats are more often people-cats.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/04/21 02:11 PM
14

Great job to the caller. It is really hard to do something live like that, and I thought they kept their argument coherent and didn't come off as eccentric.
/r/MensRights29/04/21 08:15 PM
1

My argument is that sex abusers don't get that way by accident - they have some incidence in their life that leads them to not respect the autonomy and consent of others. Sometimes that is sexual abuse they experience themselves. It isn't patriarchy that is perpetuating the cycle of abuse, it is abuse. Feminism is pulling the ol' Freud card. When confronted with something that goes against their message, they change the story to save their own asses.
/r/MensRights25/04/21 02:30 PM
1

Removed. Use np.reddit.com for crossposts.
/r/MensRights25/04/21 05:57 AM
–

Removed. You need to use a more descriptive title, and you need to link directly to the article.
/r/MensRights23/04/21 05:20 PM
8

Where did I say that?
/r/MensRights21/04/21 06:29 PM
13

Men died in wars to protect women. Men worked in horrid conditions to support their wives and children. Dude. Oppression was/is universal. The types of oppression were different based on gender, sure, but it still existed.
/r/MensRights21/04/21 06:26 PM
–

People are allowed to disagree on this subreddit. That does not make them trolls. Your post is removed.
/r/MensRights21/04/21 01:52 PM
3

Perception versus reality. As I said - the women are wonderful effect combined with cognitive dissonance explains the issue people are having. All you newbies who haven't been around for the past 13-14 years here really have no idea what you are talking about. You are just so brainwashed by society's insistence that women can do no wrong, so anything that is remotely critical of choices women often make is suddenly anti-woman. This subreddit is mostly about helping men. Go through posts and actu…
/r/MensRights15/04/21 01:55 PM
3

Prove that it is a serious problem and I will consider it. If it isn't a serious problem, then the benefit it has to welcoming new people outweighs the damage it does.
/r/MensRights14/04/21 05:32 PM
36

Posts like that exist, yes. If they attack WOMEN and we see it, they get removed. Attacking feminism is different. There are a lot of people on this subreddit who are angry and frustrated with the way they are treated in society. They have no place to vent, so they come here. Silencing them would just turn them away and find a less supportive community, and maybe a more radical community. But every time someone complains about this issue, and they end up doing any kind of survey, they find the s…
/r/MensRights14/04/21 03:45 PM
–

Instead of just expressing your feelings on the subject, why don't you actually test your hypothesis? Get back to us when you have.
/r/MensRights14/04/21 02:12 PM
16

This is why anecdotes do not a scientific consensus make.
/r/MensRights14/04/21 01:52 PM
1

This is a sub to discuss rights, not ask relationship advice.
/r/MensRights12/04/21 03:32 PM
1

Wrong subreddit. Try /r/relationship_advice or something similar.
/r/MensRights12/04/21 03:16 PM
1

There are multiple ways to show a lack of character. I clearly showed my lack of tolerance and respect for you. You did the same for me, just without name calling - you provided a highly manipulated, skewed interpretation of the situation to try to manipulate me into moderating the way you wanted me to. Very disrespectful. Just because mine disrespect was more blatant than yours doesn't mean it was worse. Step off the high horse, pal.
/r/MensRights06/04/21 08:37 PM
2

You see the rest of the subreddit, right? You see how many things are critical of society's treatment of mean and aren't removed? I don't respond to jackasses trying to manipulate the moderation by exploiting one unrelated event that is highly emotionally charging at the time to try to get their way.
/r/MensRights06/04/21 08:30 PM
2

No. In fact, I removed the post by OP instead. There is no proof that this is fake. We need to hold ourselves to the same high standard that we expect of others.
/r/MensRights06/04/21 05:54 PM
23

The issue is that feminists are starting to view "the opposition" as the men's rights movement, but they forget that their opposition was originally social conservatives. Thus, they are lumping the views of the two together. When ever I see someone say "the MRA", I immediately judge that they aren't familiar enough with the MRM to know what they are talking about.
/r/MensRights05/04/21 06:52 PM
2

You will likely be unable to have a serious conversation with the person you are debating here. They decided to report you for "Extreme personal attacks" as a result of your comment here. I highly doubt they are top 1% in their field in statistics or whatever, and your navy seal joke was appropriate.
/r/MensRights31/03/21 01:55 PM
–

Removed in /r/mensrights.
/r/MensRights30/03/21 08:52 PM
3

One person can harm many. If you don't think it is right to punish all black people for the crimes of a very small fraction of the population, then you should understand why it isn't right to punish men for the experiences you talk about. (I am not saying black people are more criminal, I am relying on the connection between the unfair, racist perception that some people have that black people are more criminal, and the idea that men as a whole should be held responsible for the few.)
/r/MensRights13/03/21 12:13 PM
–

Thanks for your input. You are clearly naive/ignorant about the history of this subreddit. I have removed your post for being irrelevant to the discussions here.
/r/MensRights24/02/21 06:47 PM
34

This is a rarely understood thing. You aren't arguing with someone to convince that someone. Your arguments are meant for the bystanders/audience. They are going to be the only ones open to new ideas.
/r/MensRights11/02/21 03:42 PM
25

"Biggest than any time in history"?? Uh, go back more than 30-40 years and certainty it is the other way around. You have a point but you don't have to resort to clearly falsifiable information to do so. Make your argument clear and concise and don't oversell it and you will be just fine.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/02/21 11:41 PM
0

Bad user.
/r/MensRights02/02/21 06:02 PM
–

This has been removed. The article does not support the claim in the title.
/r/MensRights26/01/21 11:33 PM
2

"When we define rape as requiring unwanted penetration, 93% of rapists are men." FTFY When you define rape in a gender neutral way surrounding non-consensual sex, then its about 50/50 by gender.
/r/MensRights23/01/21 03:43 PM
2

One way to do it would be to provide support to businesses that were hit the worst, rather than first categorizing those businesses and then choosing. One way is fair to all possible parties, and the other way is discriminatory.
/r/MensRights22/01/21 10:26 PM
1

Advocating for bodily integrity is not pointless. It is one of the most important things. If your religion prevents you from seeing that, your religion is wrong. Thankfully, religions are dying. The world will be a better place when the old religions have disappeared.
/r/MensRights05/01/21 12:47 PM
1

Are you sure the people responding in such ways are MRAs? Do they post frequently here? Or are they more commonly part of incel or MGTOW or redpill boards? This post has hit /r/all, which means that it is now attracting attention from people who are not subscribers to this subreddit. Certain posts draw attention from different groups. This post seems to have received more attention from idiots than normal. If 5 out of 100 people are idiots, and they all post while only 1 of the non idiots post, …
/r/MensRights03/01/21 03:09 PM
1

There are people advocating to stop groups from FGM. It is completely fair to argue for the same thing for men. If you don't like equal rights, then go fuck off from this subreddit.
/r/MensRights01/01/21 10:35 AM
–

Search algorithms are based on the presence of those keywords, not based on someone deciding the results due to prejudice or opinion. The OP clearly does not understand this and has decided to make a low quality, low effort post about it. Normally, this would be removed, however it has generated enough discussion that removing it would remove valuable debate/discussion. So this will remain up.
/r/MensRights01/01/21 10:32 AM
1

I am sorry to hear about what you are going through. As a moderator, I had to make a difficult decision - your post was caught by our automoderator rules, and I have chosen not to approve it. This means your post won't be seen by others. When you say that you have had it with this life, it immediately tells me that you should be heading to /r/suicidewatch or other support locations. That is a very serious thing to say, and I really feel for you. This subreddit doesn't have legal specialists that…
/r/MensRights04/12/20 07:28 PM
2

Can you summarize this in a different context (ie not as a reply to someone else) and post it as a text post? I would like to see this stickied.
/r/MensRights07/11/20 03:53 PM
1

What this is saying is that they refuse to define "rape" as "non-consensual sex". Thus, when people say that "rape" is a problem, I am simply going to say "Why do you only care about half of the victims of non-consensual sex?"
/r/MensRights25/10/20 01:29 PM
4

You should support Muslims who perform female circumcision, then, too. Or any other culture that performs body modifications as part of their religious traditions. If not, you are a hypocrite. If yes, then fine, be that way, you are allowed your own opinion.
/r/MensRights24/10/20 02:55 PM
7

No, they really don't. That is the problem. Feminists want voting rights for women, but don't want selective service for women. Feminists want rape protections for women, but don't want rape protections for men. Feminists want equal income for women, but don't want equal work, risk of injury, occupational equality, or other issues involved in income. Feminists are not interested in equality. They are interested in power and control.
/r/MensRights18/10/20 07:57 PM
10

It might feel good to project on to us, but that isn't going to get you much traction here. We don't want a more male centred society. We want equal treatment for men. There is a difference. If society were equal, we would all shut up and go home. But it isn't. So we don't.
/r/MensRights18/10/20 07:39 PM
1

Your empathy is irrelevant to the issue. We all have empathy for victims. You are using this to justify oppressing innocent people.
/r/MensRights16/10/20 07:38 PM
–

This is not the right place for this discussion. We cannot provide legal help/guidance, and this is a very serious issue no matter who is telling the truth.
/r/MensRights16/10/20 03:02 PM
1

As a victim myself, I dare say it because I have experienced it. You are right - we do need better investigation tactics and tools, but those can't deny the fundamental rights of individuals. I am not okay with the torture and rape of people. I don't want to be responsible for the torture and rape of people, and I don't want the society I live in to be responsible for it. As I said, I am not fascist, you are. That is the difference.
/r/MensRights16/10/20 03:39 AM
1

Then we have different ethical values. I don't want to oppress people, so I choose a society that accepts that shit happens and people need to protect themselves. You are fine with oppressing people so long as people are controlled and follow the rules set up by the oppressors. You are fascist, I am not.
/r/MensRights15/10/20 06:34 PM
1

Try /r/AskMen.
/r/MensRights15/10/20 04:57 AM
1

Wow. Great response! I didn't think of ever putting it that way. Thank you! (I am being genuine in my response, but I can see how it might be taken as sarcastic by someone who is viewing this in a combative way.)
/r/MensRights14/10/20 05:33 PM
2

There is no ideal system. Currently, we have a system that fails some people. Those people wouldn't be failed by a different system, so they are going to push for that other system. What they are failing to realize is that other system will fail other people. SOMEONE is not going to be dealt a fair hand. There are ways to minimize the impact that our failures have. By taking everyone seriously and providing proper rehabilitative support for victims of crimes, we can still keep our innocent-until…
/r/MensRights14/10/20 05:32 PM
42

An accusation doesn't mean a person is guilty. Failure to prosecute or convict does not mean someone was lying. A person has a right to be taken seriously, which is a very different statement than a right to be believed. If someone makes an accusation, it should be investigated by properly trained authorities. If a guilty person goes free, society has failed to protect one of its members. If an innocent person is put in jail, society becomes the oppressor. I would rather live in a society that f…
/r/MensRights14/10/20 04:02 AM
1

Your posts are getting removed because this is not a legal advice subreddit. Talk to a lawyer.
/r/MensRights26/09/20 01:50 PM
10

Stop trying to equate the two medically. It doesn't matter. Ethically they are similar, and that is the only argument that matters. If women have the right to genital integrity, men should, too. If it is unacceptable on religious grounds for FGM, then MGM should be, too.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/09/20 02:09 PM
2

If 64% go to women, then 36% go to men. Likely the person was misremembering the exact value and taking it from a source. 38% is not an unreasonable number to have stated if they didn't remember exactly, considering that how the statistic is derived gives a range between 54% and 64% for women. Harping on the exact value when the exact value is irrelevant considering the point being made is an attempt to distract from the issue - significantly more women than men are getting degrees.
/r/MensRights19/09/20 06:53 PM
1

Well, that is not a subreddit I control. I can't control what happens in /r/All, only what happens in the subreddit I moderate.
/r/MensRights18/09/20 04:45 AM
1

Find it on a subreddit without a direct link and tell me.
/r/MensRights18/09/20 04:31 AM
–

Nothing in the video supports the claim of the title. Removed.
/r/MensRights17/09/20 11:46 PM
3

I think that a paternity test should be required before adding a name to a birth certificate. If a person wants to be listed as a father but isn't the genetic father, then they can do the adoption process. But I know the argument that will be made - a child requires a lot of attention when it is first born, and if the partners split up right as the child is born it will have a negative impact on the child. Well, the fault isn't on the male in that situation. If the male is not the father, and is…
/r/MensRights12/09/20 09:06 AM
–

Don't politicize this. This isn't a gendered thing. Ffs. Removed.
/r/MensRights11/09/20 11:25 PM
2

Sometimes responding to these things can help the sub. The positive responses people give can be held up to show that the subreddit isn't what people claim it is. That is why I allowed this to be posted. I am not sure this is bait, but this is clearly someone with a throw away account who thinks they deserve a unique and special response to their question, despite it being answered in multiple places around the subreddit. If it were just bait, I doubt they would have gone to such lengths to writ…
/r/MensRights11/09/20 11:24 PM
22

Not necessarily in those words, but to the same effect - absolutely. Non-dickhead men who are shy or not outgoing enough to meet women get that kind of treatment frequently. They are told they are quality material for dating (but by people who don't want to date them), as if their approval should be important. Men need to be pre-approved.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/09/20 01:29 PM
7

I disagree that feminism fights against this. Feminism certainly wants women to be taken more seriously in the workplace, but feminists are also arguing for reduced sentences against women, for eliminating female jails, etc...
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/09/20 02:07 PM
1

A really great BLM sign I saw said something about the neighbourhoods with the lowest crime aren't the ones with the most police, but the ones with the most resources.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/09/20 02:05 PM
7

As an atheist, I concur. This person has serious psychological issues.
/r/MensRights04/09/20 01:54 PM
4

No one is perfect. I am able to disagree with a person on one topic and agree with them on another, without disliking or liking the person as a whole.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/09/20 01:25 AM
–

This is not appropriate for this sub. Removed.
/r/MensRights03/09/20 12:51 PM
–

Post the article, not a screenshot. Removed.
/r/MensRights03/09/20 06:17 AM
1

See a counsellor, same way to get over any ptsd.
/r/MensRights02/09/20 07:40 PM
2

"I don't know what it is like to be on these systems, but I am going to repeat talking points by other people who don't know what it is like to be on these systems, and act like I know things while still being completely ignorant." Speak when you have experience.
/r/MensRights02/09/20 10:39 AM
4

Live poor and tell me how much privilege you have. Idiots in these threads just can't seem to conceptualize what it is like to be poor, so they use libertarian/republican bullshit strawmen... So fucked up.
/r/MensRights01/09/20 02:10 PM
9

So basically privilege is being rich...
/r/MensRights01/09/20 01:15 PM
4

We ban a bunch of the authors, especially for extreme things. Other times we remove them. They do violate the rules of the subreddit. Sometimes they can be worded in a way that they get upvoted, but often times they are downvoted fairly significantly. But it still happens is my point.
/r/MensRights26/08/20 08:16 PM
-2

People say things that are anti-women all the time here. Are you blind?
/r/MensRights26/08/20 07:55 PM
2

"gist" is the meaning of something, "jiff" means a short amount of time. When I read it, the context implied "gist" more than "jiff". Did I misunderstand?
/r/MensRights25/08/20 06:27 AM
2

empirical gist
/r/MensRights24/08/20 07:33 PM
1

I realize that this post has received a lot of reports. The remove-worthy material was posted in an edit, and removing this now would have an impact on the discussion. This is remaining up for now, even though the user has received a temporary ban.
/r/MensRights23/08/20 09:14 PM
0

There are a lot of people who feel that homosexuality is wrong. Should we try to improve this for them? No. Unreasonable reactions, no matter the size of the group, are still unreasonable.
/r/MensRights23/08/20 04:54 PM
4

I disagree with you here. If a person has an unreasonable fear of health issues, we call it hypochondria (or used to call it that, the name has changed). If a person has an unreasonable fear of going outside their home, we call it agoraphobia. There are lots of phobias and other conditions that we view as unreasonable. The statistics support the idea that women are safe when they go out at night, etc. Thus, it is an unreasonable to fear these things at all times. Feelings aren't special, and we …
/r/MensRights23/08/20 03:22 PM
–

Please resubmit with a properly descriptive title. This has been removed.
/r/MensRights22/08/20 05:02 PM
1

This is a subreddit to talk about rights issues. We cannot help you with particular problems you are dealing with. You should talk to your parents and maybe your teachers/principal about this.
/r/MensRights13/08/20 03:59 PM
1

This may not be the right place for you to post. There are other support subreddits. In addition, your post didn't meet our posting standards. Please review the subreddit rules and repost when you meet the standards.
/r/MensRights12/08/20 02:17 PM
–

Removed due to non-descriptive title.
/r/MensRights09/08/20 05:55 PM
-12

I can't trust anything Tucker says. He makes up so much shit.
/r/MensRights09/08/20 01:23 AM
4

No shit, Sherlock. This is why people don't go to the police. There are rape kits for women, there aren't rape kits for men. There is literally no evidence if things happened behind closed doors. You are acting like you have the key advice that, if people followed it, everything would be better. But you are one of the most clueless fucks on this topic I have seen. Shut the fuck up if you don't know what you are talking about.
/r/MensRights03/08/20 04:02 PM
6

Oh, good point. I must not have had anything happen! Clearly! You have shown me the wrongness of my ways. Idiot.
/r/MensRights03/08/20 03:18 PM
6

Speaking for those of us men who have had such things happen to them, maybe you should speak only if you actually know what you are talking about?
/r/MensRights03/08/20 02:59 PM
–

Removed for being misleading.
/r/MensRights01/08/20 05:58 PM
1

/r/PersonalFinance would be your best bet.
/r/MensRights29/07/20 05:11 AM
1

Ghislain Maxwell would disagree with you regarding gender.
/r/MensRights29/07/20 05:10 AM
–

Work on your reading comprehension. It does not say what you claim it does.
/r/MensRights23/07/20 02:21 PM
–

We don't allow shit from BuzzFeed, and we don't allow images of news articles. Double strikes. This is a bullshit karma farm post.
/r/MensRights20/07/20 07:19 PM
–

Link to the article. We don't allow screenshots.
/r/MensRights18/07/20 10:10 AM
1

You are right. You can read. Excellent. And if you keep reading, you will see that race is the bigger issue, and gender, while mentioned, was not a big part of it. Read the title of the post, since you seem so good at that, and notice that this is about "reverse racism". Just because gender is mentioned in an article, doesn't mean it is about gender.
/r/MensRights13/07/20 01:29 PM
–

Reading the article, this is about race not gender. Thus, not relevant here.
/r/MensRights12/07/20 03:37 PM
–

MGTOW is not specifically relevant to this subreddit. The problem is that the MGTOW subreddit had such horrible behaviour that they were shut down, and so the people came here thinking they could ruin this subreddit also. We don't tell people what they can and cannot believe, so their comments stay up, but MGTOW topics are not relevant as main submissions. Thus, I have removed your post.
/r/MensRights11/07/20 08:00 PM
1

I disagree. I have a number of lesbian couple friends, and sometimes the more masculine one has more problems, and sometimes the more feminine one has more problems. Sometimes neither of them have any real problems, and they just act like normal couples do. My life experiences are different from yours. It is sufficient to show that you do not have the monopoly on knowledge of lesbian relationships and are thus speaking out of your ass.
/r/MensRights11/07/20 07:17 PM
–

Memes are not allowed, nor is images of content that can be linked to.
/r/MensRights09/07/20 12:22 PM
14

That statistic has been called into question. It is extrapolated. I am anti-circumcision also, but when you use discredited statistics it helps the opposition by giving them something with which to undermine your argument. It doesn't actually prove you wrong to point out you used a bad statistic, but it is effective in the eyes of the undecided onlooker.
/r/MensRights06/07/20 04:42 PM
–

We don't allow memes here.
/r/MensRights05/07/20 04:32 PM
0

That's fine. I can just keep removing the things you post. Takes me less time to do that than it takes you to post it. Your choice. More descriptive title or you get it removed. Take your pick.
/r/MensRights05/07/20 03:39 AM
–

twitter account info needs to be blanked out.
/r/MensRights04/07/20 01:28 PM
0

Your title lacks sufficient description of the contents. Also, the twitter information is not blanked out.
/r/MensRights04/07/20 01:24 PM
–

Removed. Post a link to the actual article, rather than an image.
/r/MensRights03/07/20 01:46 PM
0

That wasn't a debate, that was an argument. Debates are very different.
/r/MensRights03/07/20 01:42 PM
0

Kinda dense aren't you, eh? Didn't bother to read the post I wrote, eh?
/r/MensRights01/07/20 04:53 PM
2

Because it isn't the topic the subreddit is about, it is the behaviour of the subscribers and moderators. We need to stop shoving our heads in the sands: there are many people who subscribe to this and other manosphere subreddits that are absolute assholes and walk around with the "I can do anything I want, muh free speech" attitude, and then blame any actions taken against them on ideological differences rather than them being assholes.
/r/MensRights01/07/20 02:49 PM
3

/r/AgainstMensRights doesn't bother anyone anymore and doesn't break the rules. They are opposed to this subreddit.
/r/MensRights01/07/20 02:21 PM
3

So would you rather people say "It is illegal for you to have any impact on someone else's speech on your property" and "It is illegal for you to have any opinion about someone else's court case until the courts have determined what your opinion can be." That is the alternative. The current system IS respects individual freedoms to the maximum possible. The problem is where YOUR freedom impacts someone ELSES freedom. All these people complaining about "I should be allowed to say whatever I want,…
/r/MensRights01/07/20 02:21 PM
3

Yes. I think we all would like that, and it is certainly something that has not been done in the past. However, this latest banning round has resulted in some extreme feminist subs being removed. So I think they are starting to do a better job at that.
/r/MensRights01/07/20 05:58 AM
2

Free speech is a principle about governance. It is not a principle that reddit holds, despite claims otherwise, and as a result we also do not fully support it. We support open speech, though, as does Reddit. Open speech means that the topics being addressed is unrestricted, but the behaviours of individuals discussing it are restricted.
/r/MensRights01/07/20 02:18 AM
–

If you continue to post memes, especially ones that have been removed, you will be banned.
/r/MensRights30/06/20 04:18 PM
–

This is more about race than it is gender.
/r/MensRights28/06/20 04:51 PM
1

I don't see how I can view women vs men on their site.
/r/MensRights25/06/20 01:53 PM
–

You are right. You posting this was uncalled for. Spam like this doesn't belong here. Take stupid Tiktok bullshit to Facebook friend groups or other trashy places.
/r/MensRights24/06/20 04:05 PM
-9

"Read the things you want from this, but ignore the things you don't want." Bias in action.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/06/20 03:24 PM
-3

Really? Lack of sex causes homosexuality? Only poor men are homosexuals?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/06/20 02:24 PM
1

You don't have to be here. This is not an organization, its a message board, effectively. Join one of the men's rights organizations.
/r/MensRights18/06/20 06:08 PM
–

Feel free to discuss this on /r/MensRightsMeta. This is a meta topic.
/r/MensRights18/06/20 06:06 PM
1

I am saying that I will delete anything that is not topically relevant to this subreddit. This is a subreddit about gender, not race.
/r/MensRights16/06/20 11:16 PM
1

The ratio means nothing unless you are comparing similar populations. Men:Women are a similar population, so that is acceptable. To compare black people to white people, you would first need to normalize as a fraction of the population.
/r/MensRights16/06/20 11:15 PM
1

I can't say that I agree. Silencing someone is what you are asking me to do. They can't silence anyone.
/r/MensRights16/06/20 07:42 PM
5

Unfortunately, banning them doesn't change their opinion. It solidifies their opinion. Best to let them rant and then counter argue. On the internet, you aren't ever able to convince the person you are arguing with, you are instead arguing to convince the readers who aren't involved in the conversation. By being the more reasoned voice, you can change opinions. By silencing opposition, you prevent any opportunity to change opinions.
/r/MensRights16/06/20 07:28 PM
2

Nice try. This is an instance of people engaging in a disagreement/highly controversial discussion. This is not an issue of groupthink. Nice attempt to try to manipulate the situation by throwing emotive jargon in there. In the future, maybe find a less intelligent crowd to manipulate if you want to get your jollies in.
/r/MensRights16/06/20 07:26 PM
7

I get your point, and I agree it is not a perfect analogy. Let me explain my perspective: I agree with you on BLM. ALM is an attempt to include people that are not part of BLM, or to draw attention to people that BLM is not drawing attention to. It is an attempt to shift the focus. BLM is talking about ALL black lives, both men and women. Women are not excluded from the discussion. The image shown is segregating by gender an issue which does not need to be segregated by gender. By segregating ou…
/r/MensRights16/06/20 07:09 PM
3

Sure. They may very well be incredibly stupid. But the r/all and r/popular posts are some of the best ways that people who aren't subscribers are exposed to the ideas of men's rights. There is always a huge uptick in subscribers as a result of these kinds of popular and controversial posts. A lot of times, those subscribers are coming with very immature thoughts on the issues, and they cause annoyance to people who have been steeped in the rhetoric for a long time. But, over time, they tend to s…
/r/MensRights16/06/20 06:52 PM
5

Are you saying that people don't deserve to have a space to have this discussion? Apparently the original poster of the image deserves a space to have the discussion, but I must ban/remove any counter discussion? I find that unreasonable. This post is topically relevant here, and that is our criteria. If you disagree, voice your disagreement. You have that right. But I think it is hypocritical of you to voice your opinion to try to silence someone else's opinion.
/r/MensRights16/06/20 06:49 PM
5

The image is the equivalent of saying "All lives matter" as a response to "Black lives matter".
/r/MensRights16/06/20 06:47 PM
11

The rise in incel and mgtow posters is undeniable. I don't disagree that this is an influence. That being said, this isn't an instance of brigading. Once a post becomes popular enough, it can start appearing on peoples /r/all and /r/popular. When that happens, we get people who aren't otherwise subscribers to the subreddit participating. This is absolutely normal and within the way that reddit works. This is not brigading.
/r/MensRights16/06/20 06:47 PM
8

This is equivalent to the response "All lives matter" to people saying "Black lives matter".
/r/MensRights16/06/20 05:15 PM
10

The image is the gender equivalent of "all lives matter".
/r/MensRights16/06/20 04:45 PM
–

This post is getting a lot of reports and a lot of hatred, especially since it is now spreading beyond just this subreddit. I would like to point something out: When feminist groups talk about the problem of domestic violence, and how it is a gendered issue with women at the focus, it is - at best - a 3:1 (women:men) ratio of victimization (example source). According to this site, the ratio of men:women killed by police is on the order of 20:1. If feminists think it is perfectly reasonable to ma…
/r/MensRights16/06/20 04:43 PM
–

Per our rules, please post this as a link to the source. We don't allow images of news articles.
/r/MensRights10/06/20 03:38 PM
–

There is some concern that this situation is not what it appears to be. I have re-flaired this as unconfirmed to represent that this may be a case where the situation is being manipulated to influence people.
/r/MensRights09/06/20 04:48 PM
5

This is deflection. It changes the dialogue to be about men who are white instead of all people are white. She is basically trying to save her gender from any backlash from the racially charged discussions. Some white women are racist, some white men are racist, and some non-white people are racist. Deflection is a cheap tactic.
/r/MensRights03/06/20 06:27 PM
0

Don't steal someone else's issue. Create your own. Now is not the time to piss everyone off by saying that this isn't about racism.
/r/MensRights02/06/20 10:45 PM
–

Removed. Please repost with a more informative title, such as one that explains what point she is making.
/r/MensRights01/06/20 10:10 PM
–

Warning: The structure of this survey is such that there may be a bias towards identifying behaviours more commonly associated with men as being controlling and abusive. If so, this study focuses on confirmation bias rather than investigating population trends. Be aware of the consequences of participating in this study.
/r/MensRights29/05/20 09:03 PM
1

You can see it however you want to. Whether your view of things helps you navigate communication with other people is a totally different issue. People in this thread are hypocritically complaining about a problem to which they are contributing. They are stabbing themselves in the foot and then complaining about foot pain.
/r/MensRights25/05/20 07:58 PM
0

That is making fun of the situation. It is commenting on how men's rights advocates interrupt conversations to insert their issues, even when it isn't related. Since you spend time in /r/teenagers, maybe you need to work on your reading comprehension.
/r/MensRights25/05/20 06:04 PM
0

Then don't complain when someone calls you an incel.
/r/MensRights25/05/20 05:18 PM
0

Ok child
/r/MensRights25/05/20 02:05 PM
–

This is a gender subreddit, not a race subreddit.
/r/MensRights25/05/20 04:09 AM
3

Maybe people call us "incels" because some of us call them things like "femtards"? I would argue that we started the name calling. Maybe try being more civil in the future?
/r/MensRights25/05/20 02:54 AM
3

"I have found a study that reinforces my bias when I read it incorrectly, so thus I am right."
/r/MensRights24/05/20 04:45 PM
4

You realize that girls want to have sex, too, right? Sex is enjoyable for girls, and they have hormones that drive them to want to have sex, also.
/r/MensRights24/05/20 04:24 PM
11

I see the reports. That doesn't happen. You are lying. Flat out, straight up lying.
/r/MensRights22/05/20 05:45 PM
27

As a moderator of this subreddit, what you said is completely false. Some MRAs disagree, but more MRAs do agree with the sentiment that circumcision of males is mutilation and a violation of the child's fundamental human rights. You are free to have your opinion, but you will find yourself in the minority here.
/r/MensRights22/05/20 03:58 PM
1

Subreddits are banned due to the behaviour of the moderators. They are not banned because of the topics they discuss.
/r/MensRights21/05/20 06:23 PM
–

Mod says "Post the actual article, not a screenshot."
/r/MensRights16/05/20 12:41 PM
1

Post the link to the story rather than a screenshot.
/r/MensRights15/05/20 03:53 PM
–

TheAndredal, you keep having your posts removed because you refuse to follow the rules: Post to the original story. Screenshots of news articles get removed.
/r/MensRights15/05/20 09:00 AM
1

Some people here view this sub as a community, where they are free to post anything that they view might be of interest to that community. That is now how reddit works. This is a topical subreddit, not a community subreddit. Having watched a few minutes of the video, it is not immediately obvious how this relates to the topic of this subreddit. That means iainmf's response is warranted - we have a rule: if the subreddit is not obviously about men's rights, you are free to make a text post that i…
/r/MensRights12/05/20 10:48 PM
–

You posted it. I removed it. Read the rules of a subreddit before posting.
/r/MensRights05/05/20 08:19 PM
-3

And yet, here I play the rule of cop and lawmaker. When in Rome...
/r/MensRights04/05/20 03:47 PM
-2

Sounds like you are anti-authority and want to rally people against "the man" instead of understanding the rules.
/r/MensRights04/05/20 03:45 PM
-1

I never said it was removed because it wasn't relevant to the subreddit. Apparently almost no one reads the rules of subreddits before posting these days, eh?
/r/MensRights04/05/20 03:45 PM
-3

No. If you read the rules, you will understand.
/r/MensRights04/05/20 02:56 PM
-3

/u/TheAndredal, you have had a lot of your posts removed lately. Maybe it is time to brush up on the subreddit rules? You are very active here, and it is unfortunate that I keep having to remove your posts.
/r/MensRights04/05/20 12:59 PM
2

There are men's issues that also affect trans people. That is what I said from the start. That is why trans people are welcome in the movement. What you said doesn't make you seem less bigoted, rather more bigoted.
/r/MensRights28/04/20 11:36 PM
4

Many trans issues are different from men's rights issues. However, some trans issues are because of their identification as male. As a result, these issues are relevant to the men's rights movement. You are free to not care about them. Dealing with the issues people face for their maleness is not splitting the movement. The only thing that might split the movement is bigotted people who want to split the movement by excluding people.
/r/MensRights28/04/20 10:22 PM
–

Block out names to twitter unless it is to a public figure's account.
/r/MensRights27/04/20 07:26 PM
3

You realize your JAQing off just undermined your own argument, right?
/r/MensRights27/04/20 07:25 PM
3

You need to look up the term "apologist". I don't think it means what you think it means.
/r/MensRights27/04/20 07:08 PM
4

You are picking and choosing ways in which you are claiming men and women are different. They are different in ways you want them to be different, but not in others. In the end, treating men and women differently is discrimination based on gender/sex - if that is wrong then it is wrong for this situation as well. When a person is exposed to sexual experiences, or really any experience, that they are not developmentally ready for, it has a lasting impact on their psyche. Sexualizing a boy too ear…
/r/MensRights27/04/20 07:08 PM
4

"Source: Someone else told me" that is a pretty fucking bad source listed. Clearly the person who made this never had a successful school project.
/r/MensRights25/04/20 06:51 AM
12

Anti-male stuff is not seen as sexism.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/04/20 04:36 PM
13

People have been saying this for years. Subs aren't removed for their topic, they are removed for the behaviour of the moderators. If the moderators remove violence, racism and blatant sexism, the subreddit will not disappear. In my experience as a long time mod of /r/mensrights, it is typically the redditors who use their "free speech" to post hateful things that are afraid of this.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/04/20 03:39 PM
1

Feel free to read the rules of the subreddit.
/r/MensRights15/04/20 02:05 PM
–

Seems like this doesn't belong here. I do know the story behind this, but regardless just removing.
/r/MensRights14/04/20 02:49 PM
–

Removable.
/r/MensRights14/04/20 01:51 AM
–

That moment when your post is removed.
/r/MensRights13/04/20 11:58 PM
–

Removed. Apparently people don't know how dictionaries work...
/r/MensRights13/04/20 01:22 PM
1

We do take them down. We just aren't everywhere at all times, so things stay up for a period of time until we see them. YOU too can help out by reporting them!
/r/MensRights12/04/20 07:14 PM
–

Why this post is removed from this subreddit.
/r/MensRights06/04/20 03:36 PM
–

Removed. This has been discussed ad nauseam. That is how the term is used, thus that is the definition. That doesn't mean it has to be that way, it doesn't mean it is enforced that way, the DICTIONARY reports on how words are used in society and that is a correct assessment of the word.
/r/MensRights05/04/20 02:23 AM
–

This isn't about rights. This is a MGTOW topic. Take it to the appropriate subreddit.
/r/MensRights03/04/20 09:47 PM
–

Removed. See the subreddit rules if you are wondering why.
/r/MensRights03/04/20 09:45 PM
–

That's okay. You are getting your posts removed from here, too. Apparently you can't seem to be bothered with reading the rules of a subreddit before posting.
/r/MensRights03/04/20 09:42 PM
–

This submission broke several of our rules. I have removed it. There is already another discussion on the subject that does not break any rules, so please continue to discuss there. OP: Read the rules of a subreddit before you post.
/r/MensRights03/04/20 07:31 PM
4

Antisemitism is in the intention. If the intention is based on male bodily integrity, then it has nothing to do with religion. End of story.
/r/MensRights03/04/20 07:04 PM
1

Considering you broke multiple of the subreddit posting rules when you made this post, it is obvious you haven't read them. The easiest thing to do is point to the sidebar and instruct you to read them.
/r/MensRights01/04/20 01:52 PM
–

Removed for oh so many reasons...
/r/MensRights31/03/20 05:39 PM
1

yes
/r/MensRights30/03/20 07:33 PM
1

!!
/r/MensRights30/03/20 07:19 PM
–

Because. (Removed)
/r/MensRights30/03/20 07:14 PM
–

You are banned from there, your post is removed from here... Have you ever considered looking inwards and realizing that maybe the problem is you? You clearly don't bother reading the rules of subreddits before you post.
/r/MensRights30/03/20 01:23 PM
1

Your views on the gender of transexual individuals are irrelevant to the subreddit. Your attacks on transexual individuals runs the risk of getting this subreddit censured. Your participation in this subreddit is not worth the loss of this subreddit. I support headingtoshore's actions.
/r/MensRights29/03/20 08:43 PM
1

This isn't a relevant post for this subreddit. Try /r/RelationshipAdvice or something else. But if you want my advice, from someone who has been in that situation before, get out. She doesn't "love" you, she is using you. You are a safe, secure person for her, and you will never have the amount of sex that you want because she doesn't find you sexually attractive. If she did, you wouldn't have to put in as much effort.
/r/MensRights27/03/20 12:19 PM
–

Links to people saying disagreeable things on twitter, if they don't have a verified account (are a public figure), need to have the name blanked out.
/r/MensRights26/03/20 12:39 PM
1

Republicans are pushing to please corporations. Each have their voter base that they are pandering to.
/r/MensRights25/03/20 10:16 PM
2

I actually removed it. Just as you don't need a description, I don't need a reason. Right? That is how it works, right?
/r/MensRights25/03/20 05:36 PM
–

No reason needed, just removed this post.
/r/MensRights25/03/20 05:18 PM
1

It was quarantined because of the behaviours of the mods in not enforcing the reddit site-wide rules. There isn't some grand conspiracy here. The mods were assholes who put their ideology before reddit. Reddit doesn't enforce an ideology, but it does have behaviour rules. Simple and easy to follow. We enforce those rules here and have for years. That is why we aren't quarantined. We will continue to enforce those rules because we don't own this platform.
/r/MensRights25/03/20 02:37 PM
1

Since this post has been removed, I would say no. Maybe have some fucking patience and report things to help out the moderators rather than whining?
/r/MensRights25/03/20 02:09 PM
–

To be fair, BOTH parties are doing the same thing. This isn't just a democrat thing. This post is more about politics than it is about men's rights, though. So I am removing it. Try /r/politics or another subreddit that is devoted to politics.
/r/MensRights25/03/20 02:07 PM
3

Thank you for that confirmation. I will reinstate the post.
/r/MensRights24/03/20 11:21 AM
–

There is an accusation that this is fake. In these busy times, we don't have time to check everything ourselves, so I am going to err on the side of not letting our users be manipulated and remove this. If you can prove it is legit, I will reinstate it. Otherwise, I will not. This post has been confirmed.
/r/MensRights24/03/20 05:21 AM
-3

You may not be the only one, but all of the people who think that way are pretty uninformed. Transmen don't belittle men, and this transguy is not belittling men. Maybe open your eyes and open your mind a little bit? Not everyone is out to get you.
/r/MensRights22/03/20 02:56 PM
9

If the issue is because they present as a male, then of course. If the issue is because they present as trans, then no - the issues aren't directly overlapping. Trans people have a whole whack of issues with society that need to be addressed, and I think only people who have had direct experience or who take it upon themselves to learn about the community and its issues should work on the problems. I can be sympathetic and supportive, but I know that I don't have any idea what it is like to be a…
/r/MensRights22/03/20 11:53 AM
–

No, it is removed.
/r/MensRights21/03/20 12:08 PM
–

Good topic for the post, but we don't allow images of headlines to be posted. I have removed this. Please repost with appropriate links to the articles themselves.
/r/MensRights21/03/20 08:49 AM
5

I haven't yet found a politician that supports men's rights. The left supports women's rights, the right supports protecting women. Both are focused on women. More than that, I don't want to vote for someone whose other policies can screw over the country. Thus, I vote for whomever has the best social and economic platform, and then I try to convince that person that men's rights are an important thing to consider.
/r/MensRights19/03/20 01:27 PM
–

Removed this on r/MensRights
/r/MensRights17/03/20 08:53 PM
–

Not relevant to this subreddit.
/r/MensRights17/03/20 04:22 PM
–

This isn't a subreddit for you to take out your frustrations with women.
/r/MensRights17/03/20 03:41 PM
1

You need to read the rules of the subreddit before you post. This is such an obvious one, that missing it means you didn't read the rules and are therefore likely to fail other ones. I recommend you read the rules.
/r/MensRights17/03/20 01:53 PM
–

A sad removal.
/r/MensRights17/03/20 05:46 AM
–

Post title doesn't match the post content. Removed.
/r/MensRights17/03/20 04:34 AM
6

I reviewed this and I disagree. A part of it is not about men's rights. However, the treatment of men based on what they earn/what they can do, rather than who they are, is at the core of a lot of the problems with men's rights and treatment in society right now. Did you watch it all the way to the end? It was the last half of it that was most interesting, I think.
/r/MensRights16/03/20 11:44 PM
3

The most destructive tool of the abuser is to convince the abused that it was their fault/responsibility.
/r/MensRights15/03/20 05:37 PM
–

Read our rules before posting. Removed.
/r/MensRights14/03/20 07:06 PM
–

Your post fails the "reverse the genders" criteria for this subreddit. Removed.
/r/MensRights14/03/20 06:05 PM
48

Feminism, as an ideology, does not want to help men. That isn't to say that feminists don't believe that they are trying to help men, too. It is simply that the approaches within feminism don't work for men, they don't actually help. Imagine two people, each with a wound: One of them is scared because the wound really hurts, but they can manage the pain. Comforting them will help them, but they are otherwise fine. One of them is simply in pain, but is not scared. Comforting them won't help any, …
/r/MensRights14/03/20 12:49 PM
–

Removed.
/r/MensRights13/03/20 06:02 PM
–

See our sidebar for our rules. Feel free to repost when you follow them.
/r/MensRights12/03/20 04:53 PM
–

You are right. Your post format is absolutely disgusting. That is why I removed it. In the future, read the rules of a subreddit before posting. You broke several.
/r/MensRights12/03/20 02:23 PM
–

You shouldn't be surprised that we removed it, either.
/r/MensRights10/03/20 04:32 PM
–

I don't speak spanish, but other users who do are saying that most of the people are defending the man. Thus, the title is an embellishment of what is actually happening. Removed.
/r/MensRights09/03/20 02:13 PM
–

no
/r/MensRights09/03/20 04:18 AM
-1

It isn't men's responsibility. Women use the facilities and buy the products of the company. Typically men spend more than women at stores, etc, where washrooms are available.
/r/MensRights08/03/20 09:20 PM
1

We don't provide food for men or women. We do expect public washrooms to be stocked with products necessary to evacuate our insides sanitarily, and wash up afterwards.
/r/MensRights08/03/20 09:20 PM
-2

a) Equality has multiple uses. b) Providing bathroom-use products is not special treatment.
/r/MensRights08/03/20 08:22 PM
-18

Good idea. Maybe it will help more men be understanding about this issue. We expect toilet paper, paper towels, tissue paper, soap, etc be provided for bathroom use. Makes sense for feminine hygiene products to be provided also.
/r/MensRights08/03/20 07:36 PM
–

This can't get any removeder.
/r/MensRights06/03/20 08:40 PM
–

OP: This is an interesting find, but by including the username of the person, you are inviting people to harass that user. Reddit admins will not take kindly to that (despite the fact that they allow such behaviour towards our users), and you are risking your account being shadowbanned, and putting this subreddit at risk of reprisal. Please repost this image with the username blanked out. I have removed this post.
/r/MensRights06/03/20 09:40 AM
–

Not.
/r/MensRights06/03/20 01:32 AM
1

I agree that it is of interest to many people of this subreddit. But this is a topical group. People can subscribe to multiple topical groups to access the news info that they are interested in.
/r/MensRights05/03/20 06:46 PM
2

I can see this being a problem, but not a gendered one. Anyone who depends on someone else will run the risk of feeling trapped by that person. Many children are in abusive situations that they can't get out of because they are dependent on their abusive parents. Societies need to recognize what should be considered a "right" that all people are entitled to, and then society should provide that, paying for it with tax money. Health care, dental, pharmacare, etc.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/03/20 06:09 PM
4

OP, I am going to make fun of your choice of title. "Jordan Peterson OBLITERATED her! Turned her into atoms! He is a gooey mess of cells now! He destroyed her!" Now I am going to be serious: OP, don't give in to clickbait. Buzzfeed and the like should not be admired, they should be admonished. Communicate effectively and maturely in the future please.
/r/MensRights05/03/20 05:53 PM
–

Reddit has very clear rules about brigading. I removed the post you made, trying to protect you, but one of the other mods overruled me. You broke the rules. You got punished. This has nothing to do with "silencing" you. Stop taking things personally and recognize that you effectively rallied people to spam the /r/sex moderators. I have removed this post. I will keep this one removed and remove further posts you make on this topic. I have a subreddit to protect and I will not let you destroy it.
/r/MensRights04/03/20 05:32 AM
1

How about instead someone tells you that you clearly have no idea how female reproductive biology works! Maybe this will help: https://www.merckmanuals.com/en-ca/home/women-s-health-issues/biology-of-the-female-reproductive-system/overview-of-the-female-reproductive-system
/r/MensRights01/03/20 02:04 PM
–

Removed. This post has no content. If you wish to post something, post something with content.
/r/MensRights29/02/20 02:12 AM
0

No. Tradeoffs in relationships don't occur at the exact same time. Why the hell do I have to argue basics of socialism on a left wing subreddit?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/02/20 01:48 AM
-1

Women accept risks with child bearing. It is a classic gender based transaction. Until we have artificial wombs, women will bear children, and men will need to be more financially supportive.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/02/20 11:32 PM
-2

"I am going to make something up and claim someone else said that." okie.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/02/20 08:48 PM
-4

Okay, let's turn this around and make a stock market analogy... A person buys into a stock with the hopes that it will increase in stock value. If it does, they gain. If it doesn't, they lose. Either way, they accepted that risk, and thus they accept the consequences. She might be benefiting more from the arrangement than he is, but that doesn't mean they didn't both accept the risks involved in the coupling. If that bothers you, you clearly aren't left wing. Socializing risk/reward scenarios to…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/02/20 04:36 PM
–

Hi. Your title doesn't inform readers what you love to see. It is very uninformative. Thus, I have removed it. In the future, please read the rules of a subreddit before posting. Note, you are free to repost this with a more appropriate and informative title.
/r/MensRights28/02/20 03:16 PM
-2

How they divide labour in the home is up to them. How helpful he is, and what his priorities are, are up to him. In this case, he is an asshole. In my personal view, work should be split based on effort and obligation. She is in school full time, which is the equivalent of having a full time job. This schooling will assist her income in the future, so he is supporting her financially now in lieu of greater earning potential from her in the future. He benefits from it, too, even if it isn't money…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/02/20 03:09 PM
1

I know you were trying to share something, but you broke one of the rules of the subreddit. (See, if I left this post where it is, you wouldn't know which rule you broke and why your post was removed. Not very good, right? Your post has an uninformative title - in order to know what the post is about, people need to click on the link. That isn't fair. That is clickbait. Thus, I have removed your post. You are free to repost it once you learn how to write more appropriate and informative titles.)
/r/MensRights28/02/20 03:03 PM
–

I have removed this post. I would normally overlook the image-with-text nature of this post, since you are getting it from a website. However, you used a clickbait title. Feel free to repost with a more appropriate title.
/r/MensRights25/02/20 06:39 PM
-3

Getting every single pluralization and possessive wrong is also bad.
/r/MensRights25/02/20 02:46 PM
1

This would be an otherwise interesting post if you had used an informative title. Feel free to repost with a proper title that follows our subreddit rules. This post was removed.
/r/MensRights24/02/20 02:26 PM
–

This subreddit is about giving people rights, not taking rights away from others.
/r/MensRights24/02/20 02:24 PM
–

Feel free to repost this with an appropriate title.
/r/MensRights24/02/20 02:22 PM
1

Just because you can't tell who is a moderator of the sub and who isn't, doesn't mean the bot was bad.
/r/MensRights24/02/20 02:18 PM
1

REMOVED
/r/MensRights21/02/20 07:38 PM
–

Fiction is not real life. Removed.
/r/MensRights20/02/20 05:10 PM
1

Removed for non-descriptive title.
/r/MensRights20/02/20 05:05 PM
4

Get over yourself. The majority believes that there is some form of deception in the story, and they are probably right. Just because you got played/fooled with the post, doesn't mean other people have.
/r/MensRights19/02/20 03:53 PM
1

I think most people mean "gender irrelevancy".
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/02/20 07:22 PM
2

Man hating is not controversial, it is accepted by society. That is part of the reason this subreddit exists. To say that men's rights is controversial is to say that our society doesn't accept that men have any need to fight for their rights, which reinforces the entire reason for this subreddit to exist.
/r/MensRights18/02/20 07:10 PM
2

If we weren't controversial, then this subreddit wouldn't be that big of a deal. i.e. /r/feminism is not controversial, but look at their subscriber count.
/r/MensRights18/02/20 07:03 PM
2

Removed. Alabama isn't doing any such thing.
/r/MensRights18/02/20 01:12 AM
–

Removed for non-descriptive title.
/r/MensRights17/02/20 05:45 PM
–

Removed. a) We don't allow images of articles. Post actual articles themselves. b) Title has nothing to do with the post. If you want to post something like this, make a self/text post. Include your argument and discussion and then you can include links to supporting evidence in there.
/r/MensRights17/02/20 02:11 PM
–

Removed. Your title editorializes the situation. Tumblr is not a single, conglomerated entity. To claim that all of Tumblr feels this way is supported by this post.
/r/MensRights15/02/20 08:54 PM
9

OP: In general, we have a rule regarding informative titles. Your title is not informative in any way - it is very clickbaity. If I had seen this before it garnered this much attention, I would have removed it. However, I don't want to remove it, as doing so would potentially silence the conversations that have started. In the future, your tendency to post bad titles will get your content removed.
/r/MensRights15/02/20 08:52 PM
0

I don't give a shit what words you have strung together to try to manipulate me into doing what you want.
/r/MensRights15/02/20 04:25 PM
–

Removed for an uninformative title. Feel free to repost once you figure out how to write a properly informative title.
/r/MensRights14/02/20 05:36 PM
–

Removed. Read the subreddit rules before posting.
/r/MensRights14/02/20 01:54 AM
1

Removed for non-descriptive title, and failing to meet standards for "reverse the gender" posts.
/r/MensRights13/02/20 06:02 PM
–

Removed. Non-descriptive title.
/r/MensRights13/02/20 06:00 PM
–

Removed. Non-descriptive title.
/r/MensRights13/02/20 05:59 PM
–

Removed for begging the question - you are effectively making an unsupported claim in the title, and piggy-backing it on another topic. Editorialization in this manner is not welcome here. Plus, your post has zero content.
/r/MensRights13/02/20 05:59 PM
3

Your title is non-descriptive. We have a rule on this subreddit requiring users to post with descriptive titles. Feel free to resubmit with an appropriate title.
/r/MensRights13/02/20 02:56 PM
1

I have removed this post. First, there is nothing to support the story about this, it is just a random claim from someone on the internet. We don't know what is going on, or if it is even real. Second, your title is non-descriptive. We don't allow clickbait titles to be used on this subreddit.
/r/MensRights13/02/20 02:50 PM
8

We aren't. I think people just misunderstood your comment.
/r/MensRights12/02/20 06:53 PM
3

They are fictitious internet points. Who gives a damn about karma. If you feel you have a point to make, make it. Don't worry what other people think.
/r/MensRights12/02/20 06:40 PM
–

Removed. This has a non-descriptive title, and is simply an image with text. The text does not need to be in image format. You could just as easily make a self post.
/r/MensRights11/02/20 08:16 AM
-5

Clickbait is used to manipulate people into viewing material that they might not otherwise care to look at simply by playing on their curiosity. "You won't believe what happened next!" or "This is horrible!" are examples of titles that don't explain what the content is in any way, but feeds into weak willed people who are basically vegging on the internet instead of on TV. We believe that this trend is bad for our society, and we don't want to see it on our subreddit. It is a simple rule - provi…
/r/MensRights10/02/20 09:21 PM
-10

The person asked for the point of the rule. They didn't say that they didn't like the rule.
/r/MensRights10/02/20 09:19 PM
2

nope
/r/MensRights10/02/20 09:17 PM
-22

Clickbait and low effort/quality posts degrade the quality of a subreddit. We are encouraging people to improve the internet, not make it worse. We (the mods) aren't really concerned with whether low intelligence, easily manipulatable people dislike the rule.
/r/MensRights10/02/20 06:51 PM
–

OP: In the future, please use a more descriptive title. Had I caught this post earlier, I would have removed it. However, it has garnered enough participation, that removing it now would result in stifling that participation. Never-the-less, for the future, please note that we have a rule regarding titles that requires them to be informative rather than clickbait.
/r/MensRights10/02/20 05:21 PM
2

All good. Just trying to help.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/02/20 06:45 PM
3

I know this seems trivial, but I am really struggling with this... Incapable Capable Just so you know how to spell it in the future.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/02/20 06:38 PM
-1

Irrelevant. Read the rules of a subreddit before posting.
/r/MensRights06/02/20 11:17 PM
–

This subreddit does not allow submissions of images of news articles. Please submit a link to the actual news article.
/r/MensRights06/02/20 11:07 PM
–

This subreddit does not allow submissions of screenshots of news articles. You must submit a link to the actual news article.
/r/MensRights06/02/20 10:24 PM
1

Not sure why you are getting downvoted, you are correct. The problem is that people associate the term with acting on the pedophilic urges and abusing a child. Child sexual abuse is the crime that pedophiles are typically incarcerated for. The mental state of being attracted to prepubescent children is not a crime, it is a mental illness.
/r/MensRights06/02/20 06:16 PM
–

Removed. There are already many posts on this topic. Yours does not have a descriptive title, and thus requires people to click the link to know what you are talking about. We have a rule requiring posts to have descriptive titles.
/r/MensRights05/02/20 08:49 PM
1

Reddit has a series of base rules. Moderators are allowed to create their own rules but not ones that override the reddit-wide rules. When moderators fail to enforce the reddit-wide rules, the admins step in. When moderators continue to fail to enforce the rules, the admins quarantine the subreddit. Yes, some of the rules refer to content, such as removing posts threatening others, no hate speech, etc. Yes, some of those rules are selectively enforced (e.g. "I hate women!" is treated differently…
/r/MensRights02/02/20 05:45 AM
–

Subreddits are not removed for the topic, they are removed for the behaviour of the moderators. This post has been removed. You clearly don't understand how reddit works.
/r/MensRights01/02/20 09:13 PM
1

They don't.
/r/MensRights01/02/20 09:04 PM
7

Feminists have no problem admitting men can be raped, so long as it is by other men. Congratulations on starting an argument that no one disagrees with. You are circle jerking.
/r/MensRights01/02/20 06:49 AM
-3

r/MGTOW mods did not follow the rules of reddit. This is reddit's platform, we are users. We need to follow the rules. This is not different than any society - we do not live in an anarchy.
/r/MensRights31/01/20 08:51 PM
8

The friendzone arguments are always used to distract from the real implications of the term. Socially, men true to woo partners by showing how much they can provide for that partner. The friendzone describes a relationship in which women accept the provisions provided while stringing along the male - not outright rejecting the advances and hinting at the possibility that romance might happen if only more provisions occur. It isn't about men being nice, it is about men engaging in a classical mat…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/01/20 09:01 PM
3

That history doesn't come through for people outside of the UK. Thank you for sharing that. It probably should have been included in the original post.
/r/MensRights28/01/20 02:57 AM
7

Relevance to the subreddit?
/r/MensRights27/01/20 11:20 PM
16

As a moderator, and a person you referenced when you said you were reporting a person for bad language, my opinion is completely relevant. You don't get to call on moderators and then say that the moderator isn't wanted. If you are wasting our time, then you aren't a productive member of the subreddit and could easily find your welcome here rescinded with a ban.
/r/MensRights27/01/20 09:11 PM
52

We don't police language. Looks like you have a lot of growing up to do.
/r/MensRights27/01/20 08:06 PM
1

Nothing in the post states that was an issue. Nothing in the post indicates the PM thinks those are male qualities.
/r/MensRights26/01/20 06:16 PM
5

OP: A lot of your complaints seem to be political rather than based on gender. The private plane? The former prime minister did that, too. That is a part of their station/status, not a gender thing. Lots of politicians appoint "friends". This is an act that is not gendered. The prime minister may be bad for men, but don't make the mistake of using bad arguments to support your position. When you do that, it makes it easy for detractors to pick on the bad arguments to discredit you without addres…
/r/MensRights26/01/20 03:51 PM
2

I identify as a meat popsicle.
/r/MensRights24/01/20 03:43 PM
16

He was used for what he could provide. Once she had what she wanted from him, she wanted someone else to provide the rest.
/r/MensRights23/01/20 07:27 PM
3

You may want to sticky your comment.
/r/MensRights22/01/20 09:01 PM
–

Removed for being a pic of a news article.
/r/MensRights16/01/20 05:16 PM
–

I think you posted to the wrong subreddit. Try /r/politics or another subreddit that deals with politics.
/r/MensRights16/01/20 05:16 PM
1

This post is removed for a non-descriptive title. Please resubmit with an appropriately informative title.
/r/MensRights16/01/20 05:12 PM
3

I tried to google the headlines and couldn't find the source for this. Unless you can provide sources for both, this post will remain removed.
/r/MensRights16/01/20 05:11 PM
5

To be fair, it is possible that Bernie said something which was misinterpreted. The exact words were forgotten, and the concept that was felt at the time has lingered. It is plausible that Elizabeth Warren remembers the events differently from Bernie Sanders. In such a case, it is important to look at the character of the individual. Bernie has a good point that he has shown consistent support for women and women's rights, and for the possibility of a female president. Given that, the likelihood…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/01/20 03:13 PM
–

Please review our posting policy before posting. I have removed this.
/r/MensRights16/01/20 02:59 PM
1

We are. We just aren't omniscient and can't catch everything in time.
/r/MensRights16/01/20 05:46 AM
1

He is considered the worst villain of the Batman movies... It is a movie about a villain. What is the problem?
/r/MensRights15/01/20 06:41 PM
–

We don't allow people posting headlines of news articles. Removed.
/r/MensRights15/01/20 06:38 PM
15

You should use the search feature to find the multitude of times other people have asked this question. This group often discusses rights of men that overlap with trans men. However, transgenderism is not specifically the topic of this group. Some issues you will face in your life will be because of your transgenderism - that sucks, and thankfully there are groups existing that can help you deal with them, and that are fighting for changes on that front. Other issues you will face in your life w…
/r/MensRights14/01/20 08:38 PM
–

Please resubmit with a more appropriate title.
/r/MensRights13/01/20 06:56 PM
12

Research into the divide of housework usually results in a disagreement between researchers and participants as to what counts as housework. Doing a home repair? That 1 hour trip to the hardware store counts. Vacuuming? Cleaning out the vacuum because the last person to use it didn't counts. There are a lot of jobs that men do that don't end up counting in some people's eyes.
/r/MensRights12/01/20 12:13 PM
2

Ad hominem would be "You are wrong because you are an idiot." This is simply "be wary of extreme opinions".
/r/MensRights11/01/20 11:18 AM
3

So you are saying that people have a wide variety of views, and they share that variety of views, but readers are too stupid to be able to distinguish between mild and extreme?
/r/MensRights11/01/20 11:17 AM
2

I think you are wrong.
/r/MensRights10/01/20 08:52 PM
1

I support political correctness as an extension of free speech - you are free to say what you want, but there are (social) consequences for what you say. If you don't want those consequences, don't say something that causes them.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/01/20 08:38 PM
12

It is possible to support left wing economic and social views without supporting political correctness.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/01/20 07:01 PM
–

It has been noted that the author of this comic has some pretty extreme views on other topics. Not everyone is aware of these views. Support for the message of this comic should not be taken as general support for all of the author's views. Agreement with one thing a person says isn't tacit agreement for all things that person says.
/r/MensRights10/01/20 06:12 PM
6

This subreddit is comprised of a wide variety of people with a wide range of views. Some people have far right views, some people have far left views. To paint the entire subreddit with a single brush because of one subgroup of people that you disagree with is pretty unfair.
/r/MensRights10/01/20 06:10 PM
3

Ever see a body builder where all they seem to talk about is going to the gym? Or a vegan who only talks about veganism? LGBT people who are so steeped in their gender/orientation identity put other people off, just like the vegan and body builder scenario. Doesn't make them bad people, but it certainly means that they are going to be treated differently even by LGBT-friendly individuals. An LGBT person who is a well rounded individual and has other interests than gender/orientation is great! Lo…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/01/20 05:24 PM
4

One possibility is that given the stigma on educated women, women who are higher educated tend to have a chip on their shoulder. I am very attracted to educated women, but I have met a fair number who think that their education makes them super special in some way and it is a personality trait that gets very annoying. It is easy to spin that off as "men are intimidated by educated women", but really it is just that men want someone who has more depth to them than just the education.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/01/20 05:16 PM
-4

Yes they are.
/r/MensRights07/01/20 10:40 PM
-6

No they haven't. They have voted conservative or liberal or whatever else fits their personal values. It has nothing to do with what is right for the country.
/r/MensRights07/01/20 08:39 PM
-6

Whoosh The sound of the meaning of the word "self" going right over your head.
/r/MensRights07/01/20 07:14 PM
6

Uh, everyone votes in their self interest. How is this controversial? It is kinda silly and stupid to say, but whatever.
/r/MensRights07/01/20 06:31 PM
23

Well, if people are going to misquote the research and not include a citation, then of course it is going to get called propaganda. WTF is wrong with people that they have to try to manipulate statistics in a way that pushes their agenda? Why can't people just accept the statistics, quote them correctly, and then adjust their agenda to match? The study that this is quoting did NOT say that 53% of DV victims are men. In fact, it said that 19% of men and 28% of women experienced violence in their …
/r/MensRights07/01/20 02:57 PM
–

Post a link to the actual article. We don't allow posts to images of articles. Removed.
/r/MensRights07/01/20 06:42 AM
–

Removed. While humorous and non-PC, this is not specifically relevant to men's rights. It is just a karma grab.
/r/MensRights06/01/20 10:18 PM
–

This is about race, not gender. Find a more appropriate subreddit for it.
/r/MensRights06/01/20 08:14 PM
1

Actually, the account doesn't exist as far as I can search for it, even though searching for it brings up results. Looks like the account was deleted.
/r/MensRights05/01/20 05:01 PM
2

Can you post this as a new thread? This is awesome. It deserves to be a thread itself, not just a comment.
/r/MensRights05/01/20 05:00 PM
–

Please repost with the name blanked out. We don't want people harassed over posts on this subreddit.
/r/MensRights05/01/20 09:20 AM
–

Post the original video so she gets proper credit. Tiktok is a cancer on the internet.
/r/MensRights05/01/20 09:18 AM
–

Please repost with the name blocked. We do not want people harassed over posts on this subreddit.
/r/MensRights05/01/20 09:12 AM
–

Removed. Link to the articles not screenshots. No advice animals or other low-effort image or text posts, including links to images of headlines/partial news articles See the sidebar before posting.
/r/MensRights04/01/20 06:48 PM
–

Please block a person's name when posting screenshots like this. We don't want people to be harassed. This post has been removed.
/r/MensRights04/01/20 12:34 AM
–

Removed. Please black out people's names. We don't want people being harassed over this.
/r/MensRights03/01/20 09:15 PM
1

I will not let this subreddit get taken over by white nationalists. Fuck off.
/r/MensRights31/12/19 07:06 PM
–

There is a claim that this is a coal miner. Can you confirm that it is in fact a fire fighter in Australia? Edit: Sufficient evidence has been provided to show that this image context is faked, and so this post has been removed. Posting false information on this subreddit can lead to a ban. Be sure to check your sources before posting.
/r/MensRights31/12/19 02:55 PM
–

Meme images are not welcome on this subreddit. You can make the point without having to throw an unrelated image in there.
/r/MensRights30/12/19 08:47 PM
–

Removed. Post the actual article not a screenshot.
/r/MensRights30/12/19 08:27 PM
2

There are a lot of traditionalists who think the same way as feminists for different reasons.
/r/MensRights30/12/19 06:59 PM
–

Take this to a race sub. This is not a race sub.
/r/MensRights30/12/19 05:08 PM
–

This is more about race than gender.
/r/MensRights30/12/19 04:54 PM
30

Thank you for pointing out how truly fucked up the mentality is. Wow.
/r/MensRights28/12/19 04:18 PM
0

Arguing of fictional stories is pointless. Might as well talk about sexism in Star Wars or The Lord of the Rings.
/r/MensRights27/12/19 10:28 PM
1

You couldn't be more wrong about his support increasing... Maybe don't insert your own beliefs when assessing others. As for a cult, the definition would be something like "a relatively small group of people having religious beliefs or practices regarded by others as strange or sinister." While YOU might find them strange or sinister, others don't. He might not be as popular as other democrats, but that doesn't mean democrats find his views strange or sinister. Try again when you can come up wit…
/r/MensRights27/12/19 10:16 PM
–

This is not a race subreddit.
/r/MensRights27/12/19 04:54 PM
–

Post a link to an actual article, rather than an image of a headline. Things can be easily faked, which is why we instituted this rule.
/r/MensRights25/12/19 07:30 PM
5

The same should be true for female circumcision, then. If you disagree, you are the one with the problem.
/r/MensRights24/12/19 03:41 PM
1

Trump supporters definitely are. You give so much more leeway to people you agree with.
/r/MensRights24/12/19 03:17 AM
2

Trump supporters definitely are. You give so much more leeway to people you agree with.
/r/MensRights24/12/19 03:17 AM
–

We don't allow images of news articles. Please post the actual news article.
/r/MensRights21/12/19 06:02 PM
–

Submissions about news articles need to go to the actual news articles. We don't allow image posts for news articles.
/r/MensRights21/12/19 06:01 PM
2

You don't get to choose what is and is not "genuine mens rights". If you don't like it, leave.
/r/MensRights20/12/19 06:44 PM
–

a) We don't allow screenshots of news articles. Post a link to the actual news article. b) Your title is not descriptive. We require descriptive titles so that people know what they are clicking on. This post has been removed. Feel free to repost after fixing the above two issues.
/r/MensRights19/12/19 10:31 PM
–

On the plus side, you also got your post removed from this subreddit... Maybe read the rules of a sub before posting?
/r/MensRights19/12/19 02:07 PM
6

In my experience, women use more fossil fuels than men do, even if men are more involved in the production of fossil fuels (but the majority of those men are doing it to provide for their family, so...). I am not arguing that women are responsible for climate change. But I am using that as argument for why men are NOT the ones responsible for climate change.
/r/MensRights19/12/19 12:39 AM
–

Meme-style images are not welcome on this subreddit.
/r/MensRights17/12/19 10:47 PM
–

Note to readers: I have flaired this post as "misleading" because there is falsified information in it. This is why we no longer allow screenshots of news articles - because people change the news articles or falsify them and no one checks on it. Here is the actual article: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-205049/Women-work-longer-hours-men.html The actual title is: "Women work longer as the men cut their hours" This post received enough upvotes and comments to not be worth removing, a…
/r/MensRights16/12/19 04:09 PM
0

Who is defending a male feminist?
/r/MensRights16/12/19 03:36 PM
–

Our gender reversal requirements require you to not just pose the possibility that it would be treated differently if the genders were reversed, but to provide proof. Also, your post uses click-bait wording in the title, which is against our rules. Please fix these issues and repost.
/r/MensRights15/12/19 06:59 AM
-3

Yeah, he does that to everyone. He is so arrogant, he knows what other people are thinking and feeling better than they do.
/r/MensRights15/12/19 02:42 AM
1

That's okay. You don't need to take it back. You are already banned for your racism. Now you don't get to post at all! Congratulations on being an ignorant asshat.
/r/MensRights13/12/19 02:40 PM
–

This video isn't needed and doesn't tell us the story of what happened - it is very frequent that people on this sub argue that there may be acceptable reasons to hit other people. A news article on the situation is fine and helps put things into context.
/r/MensRights13/12/19 01:55 PM
–

While your post contains a good message, it fails to meet our standards for posting based on your title. Please don't use clickbait techniques for titles - your posts will be removed if you do. Please feel free to resubmit the image with an appropriate title.
/r/MensRights11/12/19 01:07 AM
–

FDS is just a response to Pick Up Artists. Get over it. If PUAs are fine, FDS is fine. If not, then both aren't. Either way, this is not an issue of men's rights.
/r/MensRights10/12/19 05:32 PM
–

Nothing in this post supports the claim in the title. This is just an image of people with some text on top. Find an article or something supporting the claim and resubmit.
/r/MensRights10/12/19 06:56 AM
–

News articles must be posted directly. It is not sufficient to post a screenshot of them. This has been removed. Please repost with a link to an actual news article.
/r/MensRights08/12/19 09:51 PM
–

Not relevant to this subreddit. removed.
/r/MensRights05/12/19 07:16 PM
7

I think the argument here is that many women support circumcision, and some men are sharing how that support appears to them. Nothing about this is a "violent fantasy".
/r/MensRights05/12/19 04:56 PM
5

Why? Your personal opinion is fine. The whole point of this discussion is to not FORCE it on to someone. If you are happy with it, and/or you get to choose, power to you. It is the same as getting a tattoo, getting cosmetic surgery, etc. As long as it is a choice, that choice should be celebrated.
/r/MensRights05/12/19 04:53 PM
3

If women had their breasts removed at birth, and it was a widespread issue, and men talked about how "having your breasts cut off is nicer, makes you a real woman", then do you honestly think that women would associate breasts with femininity? Take a moment to separate socialization from biology before you speak.
/r/MensRights05/12/19 04:50 PM
1

The post was removed.
/r/MensRights04/12/19 11:04 PM
–

Post does not meet gender reversal requirements. Please read the subreddit rules before posting.
/r/MensRights03/12/19 03:57 PM
1

Kaisa Snellman, an assistant professor of organizational behavior at INSEAD business school and a co-author of the study said: "Shareholders penalize these companies, despite the fact that increased gender diversity doesn’t have a material effect on a company’s return on assets. Nothing happens to the actual value of the companies. It’s just the perceptions that change.” The issue is that people view the company differently and so valuate it differently. This supports the view that women are les…
/r/MensRights29/11/19 03:33 PM
–

You realize that this supports the feminist narrative? That being said, this isn't relevant to men's rights. This is an issue of women's rights. It belongs on a feminist subreddit.
/r/MensRights29/11/19 03:19 PM
–

Removed. This is not relevant to the subreddit. Feel free to post it on other, more relevant subreddits.
/r/MensRights29/11/19 03:17 PM
–

Pointing out trolls as if they are legitimate is part of the problem with social media. Removed. We don't need to get trolled ourselves.
/r/MensRights29/11/19 05:22 AM
4

If you see these, report them. They are not allowed.
/r/MensRights29/11/19 03:41 AM
–

Repost with a more descriptive title.
/r/MensRights29/11/19 03:40 AM
–

Removed. Get this bullshit off this subreddit. Post something like this again and you will be permanently banned.
/r/MensRights28/11/19 09:13 PM
–

Please resubmit with the np.reddit.com format.
/r/MensRights25/11/19 11:10 PM
1

Your title is not descriptive enough. Please resubmit with a more descriptive and informative title.
/r/MensRights24/11/19 08:07 PM
–

Please repost the actual article. We don't allow images of articles to be posted. I have removed this.
/r/MensRights22/11/19 08:34 PM
1

I think this is enough to say that women contribute to it as well, which undermines the whole "toxic masculinity" narrative.
/r/MensRights21/11/19 03:39 AM
0

What is stopping someone from reposting it in the correct format? This isn't censorship. It is asking that people follow the rules.
/r/MensRights20/11/19 06:13 PM
0

Votes are irrelevant for maintaining a subreddit.
/r/MensRights20/11/19 04:32 PM
0

Too many faked articles are being posted, so we made a rule that requires links to the article, or at the very least a link to an internet archive of the article. Good judgment, you just aren't aware of the full picture. Bad judgment, subscriber.
/r/MensRights20/11/19 03:26 PM
–

Post a direct link to the article rather than a screenshot. Removed.
/r/MensRights19/11/19 11:24 PM
–

This is removed. Review our rules before posting.
/r/MensRights19/11/19 08:23 AM
1

If you give up your life, you give up all your rights.
/r/MensRights19/11/19 01:51 AM
1

I did.
/r/MensRights19/11/19 01:51 AM
–

This is not a false rape accusation - it is an unproven rape accusation. There is a difference.
/r/MensRights19/11/19 01:50 AM
–

This could be posted in a text post - no need for an image. Removed.
/r/MensRights18/11/19 04:38 PM
18

You are on a subreddit devoted to rights for men, and you are defending men giving up ALL of their rights by letting themselves be killed to protect women's rights... You aren't trying to debate, you are trying to provoke. So yeah, people downvoted you because you don't add anything to the discussion. Then, to top it off, you accuse people of being incels because they called you out on your bullshit.
/r/MensRights18/11/19 04:36 PM
1

You are a father, a student and an employer?
/r/MensRights16/11/19 05:31 PM
–

You haven't proven anyone wrong, you have simply disagreed with someone.
/r/MensRights16/11/19 04:27 AM
1

When others are moderators here, they get to choose what is men's rights and what is not. Something that isn't about men isn't about men's rights. I thought that should be pretty basic logic, but I can see that some people find that difficult.
/r/MensRights09/11/19 03:04 PM
2

You are right. How we support other people's rights will affect how they support ours. Your approach alienates people. Either way, it isn't an issue of men's rights.
/r/MensRights09/11/19 08:06 AM
2

It is pretty obvious that you aren't happy with anyone having control over your activities. Nothing would ever make you happy, so there is no point in trying to make you happy. By acting the way you act, you preclude yourself from having any say.
/r/MensRights08/11/19 06:24 PM
2

This isn't a democracy. And we stopped the democratic aspects of the subreddit when so many other interest groups decided to be loud and forceful and abusive to try to get their way.
/r/MensRights08/11/19 06:14 PM
22

I have to side a bit with the person you are responding to. Watching the video, they only focus on non-traditional male traits as positive. There are lots of traditional male traits that are positive that they could have included. "What about the man who supports his family, works 12 hour days until his feet are sore and his muscles ache so that his kids can go to university." "What about the man who walks on the road side on a sidewalk while his partner walks on the lawn side, so that any dange…
/r/MensRights08/11/19 04:29 PM
3

The hilarious thing is that it is used to make titles better, more informative, and more intelligent, rather than stupid/simple/clickbait titles... yet you said it is used to "dumb down the sub". You must think Buzzfeed has very informative titles to their articles, right?
/r/MensRights08/11/19 04:19 PM
–

This is not about men's rights.
/r/MensRights07/11/19 05:08 PM
1

We have been seeing an uptick in people who post images of fake articles to try to get people outraged, with the purpose of making the subreddit look bad. If you can't find the original article, are you sure it ever existed?
/r/MensRights06/11/19 09:02 PM
1

If you can't find it, don't post it. If you don't like the rules, go elsewhere.
/r/MensRights06/11/19 08:43 PM
–

Removed.
/r/MensRights06/11/19 08:42 PM
1

Multiple rules: Uninformative, clickbait title Posting an image of a news article rather than the news article itself
/r/MensRights06/11/19 06:07 PM
–

Removed. Follow posting rules.
/r/MensRights06/11/19 05:38 PM
–

Nothing to do with this subreddit.
/r/MensRights05/11/19 03:25 PM
1

You don't read, do you? Clickbait TITLE. The TITLE is clickbait. Uninteresting, boring, clickbait titles, and you don't bother reading... The full package of "makes extra work for mods".
/r/MensRights05/11/19 09:58 AM
1

It is removed.
/r/MensRights04/11/19 07:48 PM
–

Clickbait title. Removed.
/r/MensRights04/11/19 04:36 PM
–

This has nothing to do with men's rights.
/r/MensRights04/11/19 04:35 PM
–

This submission violates our rule regarding no image submissions of news articles. However, since it has garnered enough discussion, removing it would result in stemming that discussion. Thus, we are making an exception and leaving this submission up. OP: In the future, link directly to the article.
/r/MensRights02/11/19 05:46 PM
2

I have removed this due to the simplicity of the title. It is of interest to this subreddit - can you repost it with a more interesting and informative title? Clickbait hurts everyone.
/r/MensRights01/11/19 07:42 PM
6

This isn't a low quality post. Did you read the article? They talked about how "It isn't possible to both protect women and girls as a distinct group, and be gender neutral in a way that protects trans people." That is pretty anti-male.
/r/MensRights01/11/19 07:41 PM
–

Your post is editorializing the situation. Stop being a snowflake.
/r/MensRights31/10/19 03:48 PM
–

It doesn't.
/r/MensRights27/10/19 12:16 PM
1

Ahh okay
/r/MensRights23/10/19 03:54 AM
1

If I take a picture of a roadway construction, post it on the internet saying "They blocked ALL access to the other side of town with this construction! They don't care about people getting to work!" that would be demonstrably misleading, as construction workers always produce a bypass method. It might be slower, but it is necessary to get the work done. Similarly, there was a men's washroom. It was 20 feet away. They needed to open up more space for women's washrooms because the lineup for wome…
/r/MensRights22/10/19 07:38 PM
2

You can click on "Source" in the bottom links to grab the source text yourself, I think.
/r/MensRights22/10/19 07:33 PM
–

This post has been removed for editorializing. The OP has taken an image out of context. In discussion with the company behind this, it is clear that there were other options for men. Artificially creating conflict will not be tolerated on this subreddit.
/r/MensRights21/10/19 07:52 PM
3

I think the problem here is that the "good" women tend to be locked in relationships already, and the ones that are out there are the ones who invalidate men's feelings. So there are a large number of men dating a small number of women who make them feel this way. It is the few-have-large-effect issue at play, but with gender reversal. It is a similar thing with sexual assault and rape - a few men can assault MANY women, and so many women share a collective experience of being assaulted and attr…
/r/MensRights20/10/19 05:30 PM
–

Mod actions on other subreddits are not relevant to this subreddit.
/r/MensRights20/10/19 04:17 PM
-7

And I wish you fucking knew how reddit worked, but we can't all get what we wish. But if you follow /u/goodmod's wish, then you might at least get part of your fucking wish - or something good enough to move along with your day without being a little dickhead.
/r/MensRights19/10/19 12:14 PM
–

This post is a good example of how to get your post removed from /r/MensRights. Looks like you are 0/2. How about you read subreddit rules before posting? That way you will avoid BOTH situations!
/r/MensRights18/10/19 01:51 PM
1

Since that isn't a meme, I didn't remove it. If you don't understand what a meme is, that is your fault. If you can't follow the rules, your posts will be removed. Get over it. Improve yourself, or be a dick. Take your pick.
/r/MensRights17/10/19 08:32 PM
–

Nothing in this said anything about "gender equality". This is about how transgenderism fits in society.
/r/MensRights17/10/19 06:50 PM
3

This is a pretty unsubstantiated attack on people, and you rightly got reported. But I am not going to remove it. Religious people attack people of differing religions, and non-religious people all the time, but then are quick to defend themselves by appealing to sympathy claiming they are under attack. You are free to have whatever views you want. You are not free to impose your views on others, and there is nothing wrong with criticizing your BEHAVIOUR (or the behaviour of like-minded individu…
/r/MensRights16/10/19 10:07 PM
–

While it may be true that your teacher is an SJW (so are most of the people on this subreddit), and she disagrees with your premise, but you didn't actually follow the instructions as you claim. It says right on the paper that you didn't write on the topic of the urban environment, which is what you were supposed to do. Thus, I have removed this for an incorrect, editorialized title.
/r/MensRights16/10/19 07:55 PM
–

Removed. Post the actual article, not an image.
/r/MensRights16/10/19 02:43 PM
2

FYI, this post has been removed from this subreddit - PUA material is not relevant to this subreddit.
/r/MensRights14/10/19 05:19 PM
1

PUA and other similar things are not "self help". This is not anti-MRM behaviour.
/r/MensRights14/10/19 05:19 PM
2

I am confused - why don't you belong here? What are RSD men? And why does their behaviour have anything to do with this subreddit? Does the bad behaviour of some men make the rights of men suddenly unworthy of attention?
/r/MensRights14/10/19 05:17 PM
12

The dispute issue is exactly why screenshots shouldn't be allowed. It hides the bigger story, changes to the story, etc. It is unfortunate that we didn't catch this in time. Thanks for posting the update.
/r/MensRights14/10/19 06:29 AM
1

Make the source the post. If you don't follow our rules, your posts get removed.
/r/MensRights12/10/19 03:23 AM
–

Link to the article rather than screenshot.
/r/MensRights12/10/19 03:14 AM
–

White supremacy is not welcome here.
/r/MensRights11/10/19 05:16 PM
–

Please resubmit without a clickbait title. I have removed this post.
/r/MensRights10/10/19 02:40 PM
–

a) Men can like romance novels. b) Women read more than men, they are catering to their audience/customers. c) Stop fabricating things to get angry at. There are bigger issues.
/r/MensRights10/10/19 12:50 AM
–

Clickbait title. Image of article rather than direct link to article. Two counts warranting removal of post.
/r/MensRights09/10/19 05:16 PM
–

Please resubmit with a proper title. Clickbait titles are not welcome here.
/r/MensRights08/10/19 05:58 PM
3

Good job. As some helpful advice - you can be taken even more seriously if you use proper capitalization, punctuation and grammar.
/r/MensRights08/10/19 04:24 PM
1

Someone reported this comment as "advocating illegal actions". Seriously, who the hell is so triggered by someone saying that a false accusation destroys lives that they believe you are advocating illegal actions by arguing that it is an issue that should be taken seriously.
/r/MensRights07/10/19 06:35 PM
–

No images of articles allowed. Removed.
/r/MensRights06/10/19 07:03 PM
4

Same here. I live in a totally different country, and I knew about this also. Maybe don't live in a bubble where you think your gender makes things go your way at all times?
/r/MensRights04/10/19 06:11 AM
0

I disagree. YOU have no idea what you are going on about. (I can make an opinion claim sound like a factual claim, too, you know.)
/r/MensRights03/10/19 12:50 AM
4

This requires a source. Just saying "Department of Education" at the bottom isn't sufficient. You should link to the actual article.
/r/MensRights02/10/19 01:53 PM
–

There are going to be instances in media of men vs men, men vs women, women vs men, and women vs women. Unless they are drawing specific attention to women vs men as some kind of empowerment thing, then it just happens to be an instance of women vs men. This isn't a feminist thing, it isn't a men's rights thing, this just happens to be an instance of women vs men.
/r/MensRights02/10/19 01:50 PM
1

Yes, you are. It just takes more effort than direct cross posting.
/r/MensRights01/10/19 10:06 PM
–

Cross posts to small subreddits must use the np.reddit.com format.
/r/MensRights01/10/19 09:59 PM
–

Link to the article, not a screenshot.
/r/MensRights01/10/19 09:57 PM
1

I skimmed the article and found it was more about age and "differentism" than about sexism. Can you point out what I might have missed to illustrate that this is in-fact a men's rights issue? I mean, climate is a human rights issue. She is taking on a good cause. And yes, people are going to oppose it because they don't like the uncomfortable reality that it means they are going to have to change their lifestyles.
/r/MensRights30/09/19 04:22 PM
-3

"There is nothing wrong with manipulating women to get sex, but how dare women manipulate men to get men to pay for their food!" That is how you sound right now.
/r/MensRights30/09/19 02:16 PM
–

Clearly you are unable to read and follow rules of subreddits, since you also had your post removed from here.
/r/MensRights30/09/19 02:15 PM
–

We have rules about cross posts. Follow them in the future and your future posts won't be removed like this one.
/r/MensRights30/09/19 02:13 PM
1

We have rules about cross posts. Follow them in the future and your future posts won't be removed like this one.
/r/MensRights30/09/19 02:13 PM
–

This is just the female version of pick up artists, and MGTOW. If you think this is morally wrong, you should similarly think the male equivalent is morally wrong. Either way, no one's rights are being violated by this.
/r/MensRights30/09/19 01:46 PM
–

Removed. Get this trash off this subreddit.
/r/MensRights29/09/19 05:13 PM
1

There is absolutely no reason why someone can't just post a link directly to the article unless that article has already been posted. In which case, people should be paying attention to the first posting of it.
/r/MensRights26/09/19 01:34 PM
1

I don't care if you disagree. This is a rule that all moderators agreed on, we had a sticky about it for a week, and it is in the sidebar. If you don't like it, start your own subreddit and run it your own way.
/r/MensRights26/09/19 01:33 PM
5

Because there are more images type posts that are allowed than are not, and that creates more work than removing things.
/r/MensRights25/09/19 09:27 PM
–

Removed for clickbait title. Repost with a more informative title.
/r/MensRights25/09/19 08:17 PM
–

In order to post a "reverse gender" post, you need to actually provide evidence of the claim that the reverse gender situation would be treated differently. Feel free to repost a self-post, linking to this article plus another article that shows a similar situation but with vastly different outcomes due to gender. This post has been removed.
/r/MensRights25/09/19 08:16 PM
-21

That doesn't meet our posting criteria.
/r/MensRights25/09/19 08:11 PM
–

This post SHOULD be removed, but due to the attention it has garnered, it will remain up. In the future, OP, you should be aware of our policy to remove images of articles. Post links to the actual article rather than karma farming with images.
/r/MensRights25/09/19 07:46 PM
–

There are a bunch of claims in that article that have zero support (no citations), and it is terribly written. It looks like it is a hack job by a 10 year old, or else intended to be used as a false flag operation.
/r/MensRights24/09/19 12:19 PM
–

Not relevant to this subreddit.
/r/MensRights23/09/19 07:04 PM
2

There are many ways to write this, and you had to choose one that makes you look like a jerk... The title could have been: "Female Artists Represent Just 2 Percent of the Market. Here's Why -and How That Can Change". Article suggests sexism is the cause of women artists earning less, but offers no evidence at all other than outcomes.
/r/MensRights23/09/19 01:54 PM
0

You shouldn't be able to see it from the mensrights page, but you can see the comment thread if you have a link to it already.
/r/MensRights22/09/19 05:03 PM
0

I removed it from the subreddit.
/r/MensRights22/09/19 04:42 PM
–

I have removed this until you provide evidence that it is real.
/r/MensRights22/09/19 04:36 PM
1

Try /r/AskMen and /r/Relationship_Advice
/r/MensRights22/09/19 03:53 PM
–

Title doesn't match the article.
/r/MensRights22/09/19 06:04 AM
1

The problem with what you have said is that most kids who are exploring sexuality at young ages are doing so because they were exposed to sexuality before appropriately mature. It is an indicator of sexual abuse in their past.
/r/MensRights20/09/19 07:44 PM
4

There is a sense of self worth that comes from independence and self reliance. Being taken care of is taking away that independence and self reliance. Interdependence is different - you can still develop self worth from splitting responsibilities.
/r/MensRights20/09/19 04:57 PM
–

Your title does not match the events of the situation as described by another person involved. The OP clearly deleted their post when they were called out on editorializing the events. I have removed your post similarly.
/r/MensRights20/09/19 12:57 PM
3

I doubt you were suspended for this - likely it was your attitude that got you suspended.
/r/MensRights18/09/19 05:09 AM
12

Hey! In states where it is 18, NO ONE under the age of 18 EVER has sex. They know better! /s
/r/MensRights17/09/19 03:31 PM
1

You are some kind of idiot. We always allow links to articles, we are tired of people karma farming by posting pictures of headlines without linking to the full article. If you can't understand that, you are clearly trolling and there are rules to deal with trolls.
/r/MensRights17/09/19 02:42 AM
1

Can you post this to /r/MensRightsLinks?
/r/MensRights16/09/19 06:58 PM
-1

You wouldn't post a pic of a cute cat to /r/News would you? You wouldn't post an article about politics to /r/pics would you? We have an obligation to keep things topically relevant here. Ranting about women is not topically relevant to rights. If you don't like that, start your own subreddit or join /r/incel or /r/mgtow or something similar.
/r/MensRights16/09/19 06:42 PM
–

As many people have noted, this post is NOT about rights. However, it was posted at a time when mods weren't available and it got a lot of votes and comments in a short period of time. We recognize that the comment will likely resonate with the experiences of the men of this subreddit, but it isn't a men's rights issue specifically. However, in order to not end the discussion that has been started as a result of this post, we will not be removing the post. Thank you for all the people that repor…
/r/MensRights16/09/19 01:12 PM
1

You obviously didn't bother to read the rules, or you are just looking for some recreational outrage. I am not playing your game. You do you. We will moderate this subreddit.
/r/MensRights16/09/19 12:27 AM
–

Post is more about race than gender. Removed.
/r/MensRights15/09/19 07:02 PM
–

This is not relevant to this subreddit. Removed.
/r/MensRights15/09/19 04:49 PM
–

Removed for clickbait title.
/r/MensRights15/09/19 04:48 PM
1

Her being in the wrong, it being a shitty thing to do, and you over reacting to this can all be mutually realizable descriptions of the situation. By all means, don't be friends with this person. You can be civil to them, but if your anger at their friend causes your friends discomfort to be around you both, I guarantee they will side with her over you - you are the one causing their discomfort. It doesn't matter how in the right you are.
/r/MensRights15/09/19 10:46 AM
1

This is one of those situations where if I tell you, you learn that one rule, but if I make you read all the rules then you know all the rules. Give a man a fish vs teach a man to fish.
/r/MensRights14/09/19 09:42 PM
–

This is a race issue, not a gender issue.
/r/MensRights14/09/19 02:57 PM
–

Nothing to do with gender rights. This is two people arguing. Get over it.
/r/MensRights14/09/19 12:15 PM
–

Contribute to the 100 or so other submissions on this topic rather than making a new one. This topic is getting stale.
/r/MensRights13/09/19 04:16 PM
–

Removed. Please read the subreddit rules before posting.
/r/MensRights13/09/19 03:24 PM
2

Approved.
/r/MensRights12/09/19 08:16 PM
–

Karma farming is removed.
/r/MensRights12/09/19 08:15 PM
3

At no point in the article was the text "queer, disabled, fat femme momma of four".
/r/MensRights12/09/19 06:40 PM
–

Removed. Post a link, not an image.
/r/MensRights12/09/19 06:39 PM
–

Removed for editorializing. You have quoted something that is not present in the article. Make your post factual and reply to me here and I will reinstate it.
/r/MensRights12/09/19 01:23 PM
0

Post the article itself, don't karma farm with an image. Either be a good redditor or GTFO.
/r/MensRights12/09/19 02:38 AM
0

No, it isn't. In the future, try improving the quality of your submissions if you don't want them removed. Lazy linking will get you no karma.
/r/MensRights11/09/19 09:26 PM
3

To an extent, sure. We don't. But we do have to listen to reddit admins.
/r/MensRights11/09/19 09:25 PM
1

See the current sticky.
/r/MensRights11/09/19 07:46 PM
1

Gender and sex are two different things.
/r/MensRights11/09/19 06:02 PM
–

Removed.
/r/MensRights11/09/19 06:02 PM
–

Removed.
/r/MensRights11/09/19 06:02 PM
5

Yeah, we get called out on that when we step over the line. It happens - not intentionally. We try to be responsible to the users, even if we aren't democratically elected.
/r/MensRights11/09/19 04:08 PM
–

Morality of abortion is not relevant to this subreddit.
/r/MensRights11/09/19 04:06 PM
–

Removed. See sticky.
/r/MensRights11/09/19 04:05 PM
–

Clickbait title. Repost with a legitimate title.
/r/MensRights11/09/19 04:05 PM
–

Removed. See sticky.
/r/MensRights11/09/19 04:04 PM
–

Removed. See sticky post.
/r/MensRights11/09/19 04:03 PM
4

People have been saying for around a decade "I don't want this sub to deteriorate" and yet it hasn't really. We just all have selective memories of the past and don't remember that we (the mods) have kept things pretty consistent for a long time. The issues people are complaining about now are the same issues that people have been complaining about for years. There isn't one solution that makes everyone happy. The real issue is the scale of the subreddit - we are continually growing and that pro…
/r/MensRights11/09/19 04:01 PM
3

Gender reversal posts are supposed to be removed unless the person posts evidence/support for the gender reversal being treated differently. Feel free to report those. Agreed regarding spammers and/or trolls targeting us right now. We (the mods) have seen evidence for this. We generally don't ban people for opinions, however people posting things like "Women are loathsome creatures" or "It's the fault of black people" are going too far for us. We have to abide by the rules of reddit, and we are …
/r/MensRights11/09/19 03:58 PM
2

Memes are already banned. Feel free to report them if you see them. Images that say obvious things might be part of the low effort posts. Feel free to report them, too. We can't catch everything. Reposts are a difficult issue. Some people are new, some people miss the post the first time around, so if it has been a few months since something was posted we have no problems. We have implemented a new feature of reddit that disallows reposts within 1 week, so that should help for the people who rep…
/r/MensRights11/09/19 01:44 PM
–

Does not meet role reversal criteria - must show evidence supporting claim that the situation would be treated differently if genders were reversed.
/r/MensRights10/09/19 05:47 PM
–

Post removed for editorializing in the title. There are enough posts about this topic anyways. Contribute to the existing ones.
/r/MensRights10/09/19 05:36 PM
1

Too many people here think that the majority of rape accusations are false, or that anything that isn't proven true must be false. People just really don't understand how to form a proper statistic.
/r/MensRights10/09/19 01:06 AM
1

Mealability of memory (point 6): https://www.psychologytoday.com/ca/blog/the-young-and-the-restless/201411/case-the-malleable-memory Arousal without interest (point 5): https://www.popsci.com/science/article/2013-05/science-arousal-during-rape/ Influence of sexual arousal on decision making processes (point 4): https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3183390/ Playing hard to get (point 3): https://www.psychologytoday.com/ca/blog/the-attraction-doctor/201403/when-should-you-play-hard-get Wom…
/r/MensRights10/09/19 01:04 AM
-3

I HIGHLY doubt 53% of rape accusations are false. All of these misleading statistics are making things worse. Rape DOES happen, but it is one of the most difficult crimes to deal with. Consent is NOT an obvious thing. Most people who have sex don't like to talk about consent during the process because it ruins the mood. Consent is most often implied by the actions. Since most people are going to interpret consent from actions, that means it is very easy to misinterpret - HONESTLY misinterpret. S…
/r/MensRights09/09/19 03:10 PM
12

Men don't have friend groups because classic fraternal groups are under fire. Men's clubs/groups are under attack by feminists for being misogynistic (supposedly). So damned if we do, damned if we don't. We aren't allowed to have friendships, relationships, views on gender, or anything of our own without the explicit approval of feminists.
/r/MensRights08/09/19 06:38 PM
1

I already did.
/r/MensRights08/09/19 02:17 PM
–

Link to the actual article. This is just karma farming.
/r/MensRights08/09/19 05:09 AM
–

Meme images are removed.
/r/MensRights08/09/19 05:09 AM
10

Yes, I have removed this already from this subreddit. The poster always plays dumb when they get caught.
/r/MensRights06/09/19 05:54 AM
3

Removed.
/r/MensRights06/09/19 01:27 AM
1

Should scale the size of each region by the number of people involved to give a better idea of how significant the gender imbalance is.
/r/MensRights04/09/19 06:11 PM
1

Google search works via a chain of "shortest link". Kind of like a "seven degrees of separation from Kevin Bacon" type thing. Those articles are related to the topic, but are easier to get to than more relevant pages. Thus, they are higher in the search results. There are people whose entire careers are based on finding ways to improve a page's rank in the search results for key words. No one manually ranks pages for Google search terms.
/r/MensRights04/09/19 06:09 PM
–

"I am ignorant of the method used for Google's search and I found that it doesn't do what I want it to do, so thus it is pro-feminist." No. That isn't how this works. You have not provided any proof of your claim. You are just making a ridiculous claim. Removed.
/r/MensRights04/09/19 05:20 PM
6

The person you are replying to is being an idiot... Ignore them.
/r/MensRights04/09/19 05:17 PM
8

Yes, I missed that part. I did read it, but clearly not hard enough. Wow. That is ridiculous.
/r/MensRights04/09/19 05:06 PM
-20

Let's be fair here. The goal is to have BOTH qualified AND diverse. These people honestly believe that the women involved are AS qualified as the men. They believe that women are being excluded by choice. Whether that is true or not is an individual thing - each situation is different. There is no reason to suggest that women would be less qualified in a professional setting. Maybe in a firefighter/police/military setting, the average woman might be less qualified due to being less physically ca…
/r/MensRights04/09/19 02:53 PM
–

Those are two totally different threads, but your title implies otherwise. Removed for editorializing.
/r/MensRights03/09/19 10:44 AM
21

Having been part of the MRM for over a decade now, I am seeing actual change happening. Awareness about men's issues, and people advocating for men in situations is actually having an effect. Sometimes people want to come here and shit on the sub for not doing more, but the first step was always to get people to accept that men deserve consideration, too. We are getting there.
/r/MensRights02/09/19 02:30 PM
–

Link to an actual article or someone taking responsibility for the claim. This is just an image with text without any evidence that it is a real situation. Removed.
/r/MensRights02/09/19 01:05 PM
–

Removed until this is shown to be legitimate. This looks like more /pol/ bullshit. Also, you have a clickbait title.
/r/MensRights02/09/19 04:08 AM
0

This isn't an anti-gay subreddit.
/r/MensRights01/09/19 10:40 PM
1

Straight is not a gender, it is a sexual orientation.
/r/MensRights01/09/19 01:31 PM
0

Not relevant to the men's rights movement.
/r/MensRights01/09/19 10:54 AM
-1

Please review the subreddit rules before posting. Removed.
/r/MensRights30/08/19 06:37 PM
-3

You really don't know anything about law, do you? So very few of those things are laws right now, or even addressable by law. Most of them are the way that society acts in certain situations - they are social issues that are resolved by social change.
/r/MensRights30/08/19 11:40 AM
-1

There are different groups of people with different ideas here. When it comes to physical fitness in physically demanding jobs (fire fighter, police, military), there are people here who don't want women in those jobs (traditionalists/tradcons typically), people who want standards upheld due to the lives at stake and let gender ratios be natural (neutral position), and people who are okay with these changes. You are getting downvoted because you are grouping all MRAs into one ideology.
/r/MensRights29/08/19 01:25 PM
–

As long as you are posting revenge porn, you are not welcome to post for support from this subreddit. We don't condone illegal acts here.
/r/MensRights28/08/19 02:01 PM
0

Yeah, that is what we are talking about. Feel free to follow the conversation.
/r/MensRights28/08/19 01:59 PM
-1

Why should the existence of a penis prevent someone from being friends with them? Are you really that misandrist that you think having a penis makes you a bad person? What the hell is wrong with you? If a straight person wants to have sex with a trans person, they should be allowed to without a social stigma. That is what trans people want. They don't want to be able to point to a person and go "I AM ENTITLED TO HAVE SEX WITH THAT PERSON" (said in the voice of Michael Scott saying "I DECLARE BAN…
/r/MensRights28/08/19 03:41 AM
–

Removed. a) Clickbait title. b) You wonder why people aren't talking about it by posting an image of people talking about it, which undermines your premise.
/r/MensRights27/08/19 02:10 PM
-1

Knowing actual trans people or "seeing some things I swear are real on the internets"... Do trans people want acceptance? Obviously. Do trans people think they are entitled to sex with straight people? No. Do they want to reduce the stigma against transgenderism so that straight people don't find them "disgusting" and instead view them as akin to another gender? Yes. Considering how many people view trans porn, I think it is reasonable to say that there are more people who are consciously okay w…
/r/MensRights27/08/19 02:08 PM
-1

The call of the gullible...
/r/MensRights27/08/19 12:01 PM
-2

Once again showing you bought into the propaganda. Good job! You are easily manipulated. Hey, while we are talking, I have this snake oil that will cure all of your ills. Would you like to buy some? Only $1000!
/r/MensRights27/08/19 04:46 AM
1

That is the only reason I am leaving it up.
/r/MensRights26/08/19 01:49 PM
-4

Oh look, someone who bought the propaganda. Do you actually know any trans people? Trans people just wanted to be accepted for who they are, and that generally means accepting other people for who they are, too. They want an end of the stigma against trans people so that people's natural attractions/desires can take place.
/r/MensRights26/08/19 01:48 PM
0

This is why these images were removed from here when I saw them.
/r/MensRights26/08/19 01:47 PM
10

Fear for loss of employment for supporting a cause. Thanks to groups like the SPLC, it is easy enough for a detractor to liken someone who thinks male circumcision is wrong, or thinks that men deserve empathy, to literal nazis. And employers aren't big on hiring people who are akin to literal nazis. This is why the MRM is being labeled a "hate group", it is so that there is power over people being public about their beliefs. It is a very effective control strategy.
/r/MensRights26/08/19 01:40 PM
3

This is ridiculous. If you continue to post inane things like this, you will not be welcome on this subreddit. This subreddit is dedicated to discussing men's rights, not trashing women.
/r/MensRights26/08/19 01:22 PM
–

You need to blank out names when posting screenshots from twitter.
/r/MensRights26/08/19 06:09 AM
3

I see that you ignored what I wrote and inserted your own argument... Alrighty, that is how it is going to go.
/r/MensRights19/08/19 09:45 AM
0

Does not meet gender reversal requirement. Find a similar situation with genders reversed to support your claim.
/r/MensRights18/08/19 07:26 PM
9

It seems that you aren't really educated on feminist philosophy and are just jumping on board a trendy word and a concept. You might want to expand your understanding before you solidify your views. The term "egalitarianism" predates the term "feminism" and is defined as a belief in equal rights regardless of gender. Feminism came about specifically to fight for women, not for equality. And while that might have been important at one point in time, we need egalitarianism back now. Feminists don'…
/r/MensRights18/08/19 02:45 PM
–

Repost an actual news article rather than a youtube video from a crappy channel.
/r/MensRights18/08/19 12:57 PM
20

My experience is the opposite. Let me check some sites to verify who is right. (I am ignoring sales.) Le Chateau Women's Casual Tops: $20-80 Le Chateau Men's Casual Shirts: $60-90 Hm. So far, my point. The Bay Women's Jeans: $40-390 The Bay Men's Jeans: $50-790 My point. Aldo Women's Sneaker Shoes: $65-90 Aldo Men's Sneaker Shoes: $75-150 Hm. My point again. Need I continue?
/r/MensRights17/08/19 08:26 PM
23

This is apex fallacy issues again, ffs. If you look at regular, every-day clothes, or work clothes (e.g. suits), men's clothing is VASTLY more expensive than women's clothes. Women have so many more options and can wear cheaper clothes for similar situations. The difference is that the really high end clothes are marketed at women, and have a significant brandname markup. But only a fraction of women can afford that anyways, so it doesn't apply to the average person.
/r/MensRights17/08/19 05:05 PM
5

When feminism/feminists state that "patriarchy" and "toxic masculinity" are the causes of the problems, they are making it about men. So when you say that feminism isn't about men, you are wrong. You don't WANT it to be about men, because you WANT it to be some idealized pro-woman mindset, but that just isn't true. How in-depth are you with feminist theory and philosophy? Have you read it academically? Have you critiqued it? Have you written essays on it using the dialectic method? The disagreem…
/r/MensRights17/08/19 11:24 AM
1

If your story is true, then I do respect it. It just doesn't seem believable.
/r/MensRights17/08/19 10:59 AM
–

Removed. Take this to a race related subreddit.
/r/MensRights17/08/19 04:47 AM
–

Does not meet reverse gender requirements. You need to show an example of a man in a similar situation getting a different result, not just simply asking the question.
/r/MensRights17/08/19 12:00 AM
-1

No, that this smells of unrealistic stereotype. This is a conservative lobbyist/think-tank dream story.
/r/MensRights16/08/19 11:59 PM
-3

I am not going to tell people not to believe, but this reads like a paid posting from a vested interest party, rather than a genuine person's story. Maybe it should be on /r/thatHappened
/r/MensRights16/08/19 10:09 PM
-13

You had me interested until you mentioned God, and then it just hit every single stereotype of anti-feminist, making your post simply seem like a political push rather than a genuine account of real life events. God doesn't have anything to do with our legal system. So praying to such a being isn't going to do anything.
/r/MensRights16/08/19 06:46 PM
1

Not only that, but the OP is challenging people by e.g. claiming they called them unhinged when no such thing was said. OP clearly is not being genuine.
/r/MensRights16/08/19 10:27 AM
–

He is the asshole for shitposting. He violated the rules of that subreddit.
/r/MensRights15/08/19 07:53 PM
–

And you just had your post removed from here, in both cases it is because you didn't bother reading the rules of the subreddit. I am noticing a trend here. Maybe you should consider following the rules of the place you are rather than being a shithead and then complaining about the consequences?
/r/MensRights15/08/19 06:57 PM
–

Removed. Follow our posting policy for twitter/facebook next time.
/r/MensRights15/08/19 10:43 AM
–

Repost with a more descriptive title.
/r/MensRights14/08/19 04:33 PM
0

It is, which is why whiny posts about being banned for not following the rules of other subreddits aren't welcome. Maybe contribute something meaningful and stop being whiny?
/r/MensRights14/08/19 01:47 AM
1

And if it is a false-flag troll?
/r/MensRights13/08/19 09:04 PM
–

And now you got your post removed here for posting about ban activities on other subs.
/r/MensRights13/08/19 08:58 PM
–

There is no proof this was posted by a feminist. The claim is unprovable.
/r/MensRights13/08/19 08:57 PM
2

Removed for clickbait title. Repost with a more descriptive title.
/r/MensRights13/08/19 08:57 PM
1

There is no way to verify the information that you are posting without violating other rules of reddit. So making unverifiable claims just won't cut it. Change your title to not make claims about the post.
/r/MensRights12/08/19 08:01 PM
–

Post contains unverifiable information. Removed.
/r/MensRights12/08/19 05:45 PM
–

Feminism doesn't appear anywhere in the post. Thus, the title does not match the posting. Removed.
/r/MensRights12/08/19 02:51 AM
–

The sad reality of people who don't bother to read the rules of subreddits they post on. This was removed.
/r/MensRights12/08/19 12:22 AM
–

Can you repost with a more descriptive title? I have removed this.
/r/MensRights10/08/19 11:50 PM
1

In the past, we have just ignored the "white male" elephant in the room. In the end, race has nothing to do with it - the experiences faced by men are universal. Those are the issues relevant here. And the growing white nationalism in the US is a big deal that we can't overlook any longer. I am not saying that the political correctness movement hasn't created complications for white people. The PC movement also creates problems for men. But people don't need to bring up the race issues to deal w…
/r/MensRights10/08/19 10:37 PM
1

I agree that there is lots to talk about for gender on issues. In every single instance, the word "white" does not need to be included. When it is included, it is clearly an indicator that the utterer has issues with race. Drop the word "white" and have the discussion. It will be very fruitful and it is important to have. Include the word "white" and you are signalling that you have issues with race, but don't want to be labeled a racist so you are hiding it among the gender issue.
/r/MensRights10/08/19 03:28 AM
0

Everyone is hiding their race issues behind plausible deniability. But the overall theme is race. There is simply no need to mention "white" along with "men" to get the point about gender across. The inclusion of "white" is to exclude non-white people. "White men" is a veil for discussions about race, not gender.
/r/MensRights10/08/19 03:07 AM
0

Mirrors are hard to look into, I know.
/r/MensRights09/08/19 08:47 PM
0

Then just talk about the gender issues. If someone brings up race AND gender, it is usually the race issue that bothers them and they are bringing up the gender issue so they have a defense to accusations of racism.
/r/MensRights09/08/19 08:46 PM
0

uR a FeMiNiSt. Nice argument. Sounds like someone is incapable of observation. That's more welcome at /r/toddler.
/r/MensRights09/08/19 04:30 PM
0

stick fingers in ears and shout lalalalalala Seems to be working well for the racists in the US, like you.
/r/MensRights09/08/19 03:27 PM
-1

https://www.vox.com/2016/7/25/12270880/donald-trump-racist-racism-history https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-41488081 https://time.com/5647304/white-nationalist-terrorism-united-states/
/r/MensRights09/08/19 02:49 PM
-15

People get more angry over race issues, regardless of statistics. The issue is racism and white nationalism. Men, as a whole, will not fight back against women. It is too socialized to not fight back. But people, regardless of gender, will be racist and will fight over race issues. Look at what is happening in the US right now. A racist president, growing race issues, increased gun violence. This isn't over gender, it is about race.
/r/MensRights09/08/19 01:26 PM
-24

Race issues have always been more violence-inducing than gender issues. Thus, when race is involved it is the dominant issue.
/r/MensRights09/08/19 11:25 AM
–

You can't use meme's on this subreddit.
/r/MensRights09/08/19 10:25 AM
-60

This is basically saying that white nationalism is a danger to society... What does this have to do with men's rights?
/r/MensRights09/08/19 10:22 AM
16

To the tweeter: Diversity... you keep using that word. I don't think it means what you think it means. Having all women is not diverse, it is the opposite. Since you are a woman, having a non-woman would increase your diversity. Since you are white, having someone who is non-white would increase your diversity. Having another woman would not.
/r/MensRights08/08/19 12:32 PM
3

The connection between smoking and lung cancer does have a causal relationship. They have performed tests of human analogs exposed to cigarette smoke against non-smoke baseline and found an increase of cancer rates. That is causal. WTF is wrong with you? Baby boys aren't having sex, they don't need to be protected from HPV, and they don't get cervical cancer because they don't have a cervix. There is nothing wrong with letting them get CHOOSE whether they want that protection when they are older…
/r/MensRights07/08/19 09:20 PM
6

If it is illegal to do to girls but not to boys, it is 100% a gender rights issue.
/r/MensRights07/08/19 06:45 PM
–

Wrong subreddit for this.
/r/MensRights07/08/19 06:44 PM
6

It is a good thing you are reading it. Now use some reading comprehension on it. "associated with a reduced risk" means that there is a correlation found but no causal relation found. It is possible that there are confounding factors that explain the correlation that have nothing to do with the circumcision itself. Next time, bring your A-game before you speak out of your ass.
/r/MensRights07/08/19 06:42 PM
6

Circumcision is a men's rights issue. It happens only to men in western society, thus gender is a critical component of it. Women are protected from it, thus the gender for whom it is an issue is men. You are free to disagree about whether you care about it, but it is 100% an issue that will be discussed on this subreddit. Religion doesn't trump individual rights.
/r/MensRights06/08/19 03:46 PM
0

I don't care if you contest it. Sitting on someone's thigh is not sexual battery, especially if that person is taking up multiple seats when they should not be.
/r/MensRights06/08/19 03:01 PM
–

Title doesn't match the post content. Removed.
/r/MensRights06/08/19 02:48 PM
–

Removed. Yes it is a men's rights issue, end of story.
/r/MensRights06/08/19 12:52 PM
–

Apologies for the remove, but you posted a meme.
/r/MensRights01/08/19 08:30 PM
–

How sad is it that this is removed?
/r/MensRights01/08/19 08:29 PM
–

This is removed.
/r/MensRights01/08/19 08:29 PM
–

Sadly this was removed.
/r/MensRights01/08/19 05:28 PM
2

Did you seriously refer to a gender as a species? And then somehow claim that we are the greatest?
/r/MensRights01/08/19 02:02 PM
2

Talking about the issue is a men's rights issue. Showing a single instance isn't. It belongs in a women behaving badly subreddit.
/r/MensRights30/07/19 11:21 PM
1

Okay. And?
/r/MensRights30/07/19 09:13 PM
–

Removed. This is a meme. The claim is false. Continuing to post demonstrably false information will get you banned.
/r/MensRights30/07/19 07:28 PM
–

This is an instance of one bad person, not an issue of men's rights.
/r/MensRights30/07/19 07:20 PM
–

Removed. Post an actual link.
/r/MensRights30/07/19 07:20 PM
13

Projecting much? Women are the more biased gender, on average. Women are the ones who make women-only groups, women-only organizations, do "ladies night", etc. Women exclude men. The reverse is FAR less common. As for "feeling oppressed", you only feel oppressed because a bunch of women got together and told each other that they are being oppressed. Do you feel uncertain and scared because you don't know how other people are going to behave? People might catcall or talk to you when you don't wan…
/r/MensRights29/07/19 09:08 PM
1

Removed. There is insufficient evidence to show that there isn't a men's washroom.
/r/MensRights27/07/19 04:51 PM
-23

I never said it was.
/r/MensRights26/07/19 04:28 AM
–

Read the sidebar. Memes aren't allowed.
/r/MensRights26/07/19 03:54 AM
-37

This seems more like a r/thathappened content. People don't accept male rape, but they don't go that far. The other day we had a post here about a person who said that people at r/teenagers told them off, etc, and yet there was nothing in their post history from r/teenagers. Its the same style of writing - someone writes a description that perfectly fits a stereotype in the most implausible way. Rape victims at group therapy wouldn't laugh at someone and call them dramatic, even if they don't be…
/r/MensRights26/07/19 03:53 AM
27

The point isn't to convince feminists. The point is to convince everyone else. Other people do use logic. The goal here is to share an idea that we believe in, in hopes that those with the power and ability to change things will listen and take action.
/r/MensRights25/07/19 09:20 PM
249

This is a perfect example of "Institutional discrimination". When the institutions of society are biased against you, you are being discriminated against on an institutional level. These threats would hold absolutely no weight if there weren't institutional support for accusations without evidence by women. When feminists say that sexism is prejudice + power, the power they refer to is institutional discrimination. Further evidence that sexism against men exists. It might be difference than sexi…
/r/MensRights25/07/19 08:02 PM
2

That is what removed refers to, yes.
/r/MensRights24/07/19 11:14 PM
1

Right. And he is. But he isn't the only asshole. So people aren't giving the woman a break.
/r/MensRights22/07/19 02:33 PM
0

Right. And he is. But he isn't the only asshole. So people aren't giving the woman a break.
/r/MensRights22/07/19 02:33 PM
–

Misleading title. Removed. Majority are saying ESH.
/r/MensRights22/07/19 01:10 PM
2

Removed.
/r/MensRights22/07/19 12:42 PM
–

There are two things that are part of the "war on women", yet the title conflates it with a single part. Thus, the title is misleading and the post is removed.
/r/MensRights21/07/19 04:34 PM
–

Memes are considered spam here. Removed.
/r/MensRights20/07/19 01:09 PM
–

Really old issue.
/r/MensRights19/07/19 11:08 PM
–

Repost with a more descriptive title. I have removed this.
/r/MensRights19/07/19 02:29 PM
-4

https://www.wf-lawyers.com/divorce-statistics-and-facts/ Only ~41% of first marriages end in divorce. Thus, the majority of people who get married for their first time stay married until death. 50% of all marriages end in divorce, so certainly many people take several tries to get into a stable marriage state. The solution isn't to avoid marriage. The solution is to fix the broken marriage laws. https://www.sciencealert.com/widespread-loneliness-is-killing-people-and-we-need-to-start-taking-this…
/r/MensRights18/07/19 02:07 PM
–

The title is not supported by the post. Removed.
/r/MensRights17/07/19 04:10 PM
–

Repost following our crosslinking rules.
/r/MensRights16/07/19 09:15 AM
–

https://lmgtfy.com/?q=define%3A%20identical&s=g
/r/MensRights14/07/19 06:46 PM
-1

He didn't just refuse it, he REFUSED it. Wow! And it's not just another one, it's ANOTHER one! Boy, when you selectively capitalize like that, your post seems so much more cool and edgy. Good job.
/r/MensRights12/07/19 01:57 PM
3

Not surprising at all. People always cherry pick statistics that support what they want. How about you fix that and provide the full picture calculation?
/r/MensRights12/07/19 12:45 AM
–

Removed for being false.
/r/MensRights11/07/19 08:49 PM
0

The irrational person always believes that what they do is rational because they believe they themselves are rational, and cognitive dissonance is a really difficult thing to face. You believe your argument is rational simply because you believe you are rational. You stated that feminists view man spreading as a mysoginistic result of the patriarchy. Then you applied the word feminist to a woman sitting on public transit taking up multiple spaces. a) You clearly don't understand the concept of m…
/r/MensRights10/07/19 02:39 PM
0

What brigading minority? I saw your post on my own and removed it. Just because you don't have the ability to form a rational, coherent argument, don't take it out on me. Maybe it is time to improve yourself rather than blame others for your faults.
/r/MensRights10/07/19 01:37 PM
1

In your title.
/r/MensRights10/07/19 01:27 PM
3

You are free to find a different subreddit that doesn't have standards. Or you are free to post material that supports your claims.
/r/MensRights10/07/19 12:57 PM
–

Nothing in the image suggests the person is a feminist. Removed. OP - stop editorializing.
/r/MensRights10/07/19 12:38 PM
–

Title is not sufficiently detailed.
/r/MensRights08/07/19 10:45 PM
–

In this thread: A lot of people who don't understand sarcasm and satire.
/r/MensRights08/07/19 08:13 PM
2

You don't have to be here. OP posted the link when his post was correct, but the trend changed. If you hold that against him, YOU are the problem.
/r/MensRights08/07/19 05:20 PM
–

Not relevant to men's rights.
/r/MensRights08/07/19 02:46 PM
–

Not relevant to men's rights.
/r/MensRights08/07/19 02:45 PM
3

Exactly.
/r/MensRights08/07/19 10:28 AM
9

Maybe OP jumped the gun and should wait until the verdict is in before calling it, as is a commonly held belief in this subreddit (to not pre-judge)?
/r/MensRights08/07/19 08:53 AM
–

Note: OP is incorrect, the majority of responses are NTA or NAH, indicating that the man is not called the asshole in the situation except by a relatively minor number of responders.
/r/MensRights08/07/19 08:40 AM
1

This argument comes across as very insulting to the women themselves. How about make the argument that women get paid a larger percentage of the revenues than the men do, so the "equal pay" would result in men getting paid more?
/r/MensRights08/07/19 01:11 AM
–

Post made without proof. Removed.
/r/MensRights07/07/19 11:43 PM
–

Contribute to the other discussions on this subject that don't show the original sub where it came from. It isn't important and is just going to result in people participating in that sub and undermining the whole message.
/r/MensRights07/07/19 05:42 PM
12

If the people in power (moderators) show this by example, things will improve. Nothing changes immediately.
/r/MensRights07/07/19 05:41 PM
46

Best not to. Let the post stand for itself.
/r/MensRights07/07/19 05:40 PM
3

I never said anything justified it. However, the OP implied something about the situation which is not supported by the video - namely that the girls attacked and molest him. The video only shows violence between two parties. Attack implies that it was unprovoked. As far as we know, the girls were defending themselves, and the boy attacked them further. A common topic of this subreddit is presumed innocence, which is not supported by the OP.
/r/MensRights06/07/19 07:53 PM
–

We have no idea what started the situation. All this is is a fight between a guy and girls.
/r/MensRights06/07/19 12:40 PM
1

A reminder: legal innocence does not mean the accuser was lying, just as an accusation doesn't mean the accused is guilty.
/r/MensRights05/07/19 10:20 PM
–

Removed. Please see the subreddit rules before posting.
/r/MensRights05/07/19 07:23 PM
1

On this subreddit, people talk about women wanting rights without the added responsibilities, and yet I see people like you talking about taking away responsibilities from men. It doesn't work that way. With rights come responsibilities. That includes the responsibility to accept the consequences of having a one night stand without knowing if the person is married, the consequences of having sex with someone and producing a child, etc.
/r/MensRights04/07/19 01:03 PM
1

I did not mean to imply that the father gets sued for damages, however as long as child support laws are in place then the correct father should be paying the child support rather than the duped father. The biological father should pay the child support and back child support to the duped father. He has some culpability in this, too - he slept with a woman who was involved with another man. The onus is not entirely on the woman, it takes two to have an affair, and it takes two to get pregnant, a…
/r/MensRights03/07/19 06:52 PM
4

I would like to see alternative approaches to this. If the person wins, and I think that is highly unlikely, the child will grow up in a worse state and that is concerning. Here is how I think these situations should be resolved: Sue the mother for minor amount of emotional damages. Sue the real father for the amount of money that would have been his responsibility in the first place. The guy who has been emotionally damaged will get his money returned, the real father will be forced to step up …
/r/MensRights03/07/19 03:47 PM
–

Removed. See our subreddit rules.
/r/MensRights03/07/19 09:26 AM
3

In other news, water is wet?
/r/MensRights02/07/19 03:57 AM
0

See, I am going to have to disagree here. Does it suck to have people interested in you when you don't reciprocate? Yeah, because then you have to be an adult and deal with the emotional challenge of giving rejection, while they have to deal with the emotional challenge of being rejected. But you are riding the politically correct wording line that suggests an underlying demonization of men's sexuality. Women are sexually liberated now - they are allowed to want to have sex, to pursue sex, etc. …
/r/MensRights27/06/19 09:17 PM
7

I upvoted you because I agree with your first sentence. But I think it does a lot of harm to trans-acceptance by overusing the term "transphobia". There is also trans-ignorance, and I think that term applies better than phobia. Allow for people to be ignorant before you accuse them of being phobic, and you will create an opportunity to teach and grow rather than create someone who is an opponent.
/r/MensRights27/06/19 09:13 PM
1

Well the claim is that you didn't.
/r/MensRights27/06/19 11:08 AM
–

No we aren't. We put a stop to violence and downvote violence. If people post that here, they will be banned.
/r/MensRights26/06/19 09:11 PM
–

We have rules about posting memes.
/r/MensRights26/06/19 10:41 AM
–

OP, maybe you should learn a little about biology and genetics. They are not "blaming" men. For example, men get their genes for baldness from their mother's side. It isn't women's FAULT, it is biology.
/r/MensRights26/06/19 10:24 AM
–

Title is not descriptive. Please repost with an appropriately descriptive title.
/r/MensRights25/06/19 05:27 PM
2

Nothing said he LIED about a vasectomy. Not disclosing is not the same thing as lying. I doubt he was ever asked "Are you fertile?" I love how you not getting upvoted for your opinion makes other people "toxic". It must be quite the world you live in where people either support you or are toxic. You don't get into many debates, do you?
/r/MensRights25/06/19 02:16 PM
2

It is possible that BOTH people did something wrong. However, not disclosing a vasectomy is not the same thing as cheating. I think the majority would say that cheating is worse. There are lots of impotent people in the world, and failing to disclose that is not a violation of marriage vows.
/r/MensRights25/06/19 01:29 PM
1

You replaced the word feminism with patriarchy. You might want to go back and fix that.
/r/MensRights25/06/19 01:26 PM
3

Same thing.
/r/MensRights25/06/19 01:25 PM
–

There is so much women bashing in this thread, it isn't even worth cleaning. I am removing the post. OP, if you want an answer, the journalist who wrote the article is an idiot and turned it into a girl power thing. From a scientific perspective, sending all women is a good idea - you maximize the amount of people who can bear children while sending the fewest number of astronauts. It costs a lot and causes a lot of complications to have more people on board a space ship, in terms of facilities,…
/r/MensRights24/06/19 08:04 PM
0

Nope.
/r/MensRights24/06/19 02:28 AM
0

Yeah, so SJW that I moderate a men's rights forum, right? Get your head out of your ass.
/r/MensRights24/06/19 02:20 AM
1

Yeah, so SJW that I moderate a men's rights forum, right? Get your head out of your ass.
/r/MensRights24/06/19 02:20 AM
0

Naw, but that's okay. You are pretty blinded right now by indoctrination. I hope you come out the other side.
/r/MensRights24/06/19 02:15 AM
0

Ah, I see that you align with the white supremacy movement, intro division. That makes more sense now.
/r/MensRights24/06/19 01:56 AM
-1

https://imgur.com/a/Cx43AZJ#vNTayJy That is a statement that the races should be separated. This is a common theme among white (or any racial) supremacy believers.
/r/MensRights23/06/19 11:07 PM
0

No not really.
/r/MensRights23/06/19 09:10 PM
1

Yeah, it really kinda is white supremacy.
/r/MensRights23/06/19 09:08 PM
1

No. Innocent until guilty is NOT the same thing as false accusation. Don't be a fucking idiot and commit the same mistake that they are.
/r/MensRights22/06/19 09:30 PM
4

People in this thread don't hate women like you do. That's all.
/r/MensRights22/06/19 04:02 PM
–

Until a court has ruled, it is not a false rape allegation. Thus, the title is not accurate, and the post has been removed.
/r/MensRights22/06/19 02:22 PM
2

Yeah. It more of the same "look at me, I know how to fix everything, here is my uninformed suggestion, now don't you think I am super smart?" crap that fills lots of reddit meta posts.
/r/MensRights21/06/19 02:29 PM
2

There is a default feature of reddit that limits response rates for new subscribers. It is part of reddit, and part of every single subreddit. OP just doesn't really know what he is talking about. Mods have absolutely no way to access how long someone has been a subscriber. Is the OP concern-trolling? No, but they certainly are deflecting the attention from issues on to how people are responding to issues.
/r/MensRights20/06/19 04:40 AM
2

There appears to be a concerted effort to post anti-LGBT things in this thread. This does not represent the sub in general.
/r/MensRights15/06/19 11:30 PM
3

I love how you insult someone's intelligence and then say "threw" instead of "through". Brilliant. If you can't understand it, people can want CHANGES in the existing laws. Think about that for a bit.
/r/MensRights15/06/19 04:40 AM
0

Removed. Insufficient evidence provided in the post to support the claim. Please submit a link to the article rather than this clickbait.
/r/MensRights14/06/19 04:52 AM
–

Removed. Insufficient evidence to support the claim.
/r/MensRights12/06/19 07:37 PM
2

It's okay. I have now removed your post for violating our posting standards. I would have let goodmod's response stand, but you clearly aren't taking it well so you need a stronger wakeup call.
/r/MensRights11/06/19 01:12 PM
–

I watched the video and can't see the men's rights angle for this. Seems to be anti-PC-culture, anti-trans-culture.
/r/MensRights05/06/19 01:23 PM
23

If it was 1 year ago, then it has been long enough that most people have either forgotten or never saw it. We are only concerned with reposts if there are multiple within the same week/month.
/r/MensRights05/06/19 12:33 PM
–

Already been posted multiple times. Contribute to the existing postings rather than creating a new one.
/r/MensRights04/06/19 06:42 PM
1

Thanks. Removed.
/r/MensRights02/06/19 06:03 PM
3

Yeah... If only you had not taught him how evil men were, he would actually have some self respect so that he could leave her. This is a problem with feminism.
/r/MensRights02/06/19 03:12 PM
1

Title does not meet our posting standards. Not only is nothing about women mentioned in the post, the post title is not descriptive of what will be viewed in the post.
/r/MensRights02/06/19 02:15 PM
-3

No. I know lots of successful, strong women who are also feminists.
/r/MensRights02/06/19 11:06 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter