TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

UNLIKELYME Archive

View 66 posts and 1,110 comments by UNLIKELYME on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
279

DiscriminationUNLIKELYME/r/MensRights27/01/18 03:25 PM
229

DiscriminationUNLIKELYME/r/MensRights17/09/18 10:50 AM
204

False AccusationUNLIKELYME/r/MensRights15/09/19 06:33 AM
171

GeneralUNLIKELYME/r/MensRights07/12/18 01:51 PM
170

GeneralUNLIKELYME/r/MensRights25/09/17 09:32 AM
129

Social IssuesUNLIKELYME/r/MensRights26/09/17 06:41 AM
124

Social IssuesUNLIKELYME/r/MensRights22/01/18 09:24 PM
124

Social IssuesUNLIKELYME/r/MensRights21/09/17 04:33 AM
112

GeneralUNLIKELYME/r/MensRights28/01/18 01:24 PM
108

Social IssuesUNLIKELYME/r/MensRights11/11/18 09:53 AM
84

Activism/SupportUNLIKELYME/r/MensRights08/12/18 09:57 AM
84

GeneralUNLIKELYME/r/MensRights15/11/18 11:46 AM
72

DiscriminationUNLIKELYME/r/MensRights09/08/18 09:58 AM
71

DiscriminationUNLIKELYME/r/MensRights15/05/17 07:01 AM
70

ProgressUNLIKELYME/r/MensRights18/09/18 11:45 AM
65

Edu./Occu.UNLIKELYME/r/MensRights08/02/18 09:31 AM
63

Activism/SupportUNLIKELYME/r/MensRights28/09/17 09:48 AM
63

Social IssuesUNLIKELYME/r/MensRights24/09/17 08:54 AM
57

Edu./Occu.UNLIKELYME/r/MensRights12/07/18 02:52 PM
54

GeneralUNLIKELYME/r/MensRights27/01/18 08:59 AM
49

UNLIKELYME/r/MensRights30/06/18 05:47 PM
44

GeneralUNLIKELYME/r/MensRights28/09/17 03:15 PM
42

Social IssuesUNLIKELYME/r/MensRights26/10/19 06:24 AM
42

FeminismUNLIKELYME/r/MensRights27/05/18 08:07 AM
41

Social IssuesUNLIKELYME/r/MensRights27/10/19 05:54 AM
36

Social IssuesUNLIKELYME/r/MensRights25/05/17 10:51 AM
36

DiscriminationUNLIKELYME/r/MensRights21/08/18 11:48 AM
32

GeneralUNLIKELYME/r/MensRights19/10/19 05:55 PM
30

Social IssuesUNLIKELYME/r/MensRights07/08/18 03:58 PM
30

DiscriminationUNLIKELYME/r/MensRights06/08/18 02:08 PM
27

False AccusationUNLIKELYME/r/MensRights09/10/17 02:46 PM
26

DiscriminationUNLIKELYME/r/MensRights29/08/18 02:57 PM
26

GeneralUNLIKELYME/r/MensRights18/08/18 04:44 PM
23

Anti-MRMUNLIKELYME/r/MensRights19/11/18 06:44 AM
23

Activism/SupportUNLIKELYME/r/MensRights01/02/19 10:21 AM
22

Edu./Occu.UNLIKELYME/r/MensRights22/09/17 07:00 AM
21

UNLIKELYME/r/MensRights04/04/19 07:39 AM
20

UNLIKELYME/r/MensRights09/07/16 02:08 PM
20

Social IssuesUNLIKELYME/r/MensRights06/10/19 11:55 AM
19

Social IssuesUNLIKELYME/r/MensRights30/08/18 06:32 AM
17

Social IssuesUNLIKELYME/r/MensRights20/11/18 06:35 PM
16

Social IssuesUNLIKELYME/r/MensRights09/02/18 07:55 AM
16

GeneralUNLIKELYME/r/MensRights12/08/18 09:10 AM
16

QuestionsUNLIKELYME/r/MensRights27/05/17 04:56 PM
15

Social IssuesUNLIKELYME/r/MensRights01/03/19 05:43 AM
14

Edu./Occu.UNLIKELYME/r/MensRights22/02/18 08:21 AM
11

Social IssuesUNLIKELYME/r/MensRights20/10/17 02:48 PM
10

DiscriminationUNLIKELYME/r/MensRights21/08/18 09:39 AM
10

GeneralUNLIKELYME/r/MensRights19/10/17 12:39 PM
10

Social IssuesUNLIKELYME/r/MensRights22/02/18 08:41 AM
10

Social IssuesUNLIKELYME/r/MensRights17/05/17 01:20 PM
9

GeneralUNLIKELYME/r/MensRights29/05/18 06:16 PM
9

Social IssuesUNLIKELYME/r/MensRights19/02/18 01:30 PM
9

DiscriminationUNLIKELYME/r/MensRights04/08/18 07:54 AM
8

UNLIKELYME/r/MensRights07/06/16 05:29 AM
8

Legal RightsUNLIKELYME/r/MensRights23/10/17 07:42 AM
7

UNLIKELYME/r/MensRights10/07/16 12:04 PM
7

Social IssuesUNLIKELYME/r/MensRights11/10/17 11:29 AM
6

Social IssuesUNLIKELYME/r/MensRights21/02/18 08:07 AM
4

DiscriminationUNLIKELYME/r/MensRights01/02/18 05:38 PM
3

GeneralUNLIKELYME/r/MensRights18/09/18 07:51 AM
3

Social IssuesUNLIKELYME/r/MensRights03/03/19 09:47 AM
3

Social IssuesUNLIKELYME/r/MensRights07/05/19 07:39 AM
3

GeneralUNLIKELYME/r/MensRights16/05/17 02:16 PM
1

FeminismUNLIKELYME/r/MensRights16/08/18 05:11 PM
1

UNLIKELYME/r/MensRights07/12/18 08:39 PM
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 1,110 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
14

So, 75% of women think Feminism is good or, at least, not bad. That's alarming, thinking about the equality challenges the western societies are facing, like the education gap, more and more men getting marginalized and so forth. As long as we let Feminists control the discourse on the "gender issues" the gaps are going to widen and inequality increase.
/r/MensRights16/07/19 05:43 AM
6

You mean that women are favored, right?
/r/MensRights06/05/19 04:37 AM
1

Data suggest that we are going to have more and more men without family ties.
/r/MensRights01/05/19 08:10 PM
1

What data? All western societies favor women. There are lots of studies indicating that people are hardwired to favor women. Anyways, that's not the point.
/r/MensRights01/05/19 06:36 PM
1

The sexual relationships are the micro-cosmos, the society which favors women is the macro-cosmos.
/r/MensRights01/05/19 03:13 PM
1

A couple of possible explanations: There is less sex. Men are no more lying.
/r/MensRights01/05/19 03:08 PM
2

Feminism is not only anti-men, its' also anti-facts.
/r/MensRights01/05/19 02:59 PM
2

What is a "liberal company"? A company that has leftist views or a company that has liberal (derived from liberalism) views?
/r/MensRights01/05/19 02:55 PM
1

Good ol' days when people didn't understand political correctness. Nowadays many feminists think the same way but rarely say it out loud. If they did, the world would be a better place.
/r/MensRights01/05/19 07:57 AM
1

About 200 000 years ago this chimp we call Homo Sapiens. started this crazy trip towards being conscious and thinking about morality and the kind of questions you ask. Why`? Because men were evil`Because women were inferior?
/r/MensRights18/04/19 04:44 PM
1

heh, my point was not to know what the weather was like in St. Petersburg. Come on!
/r/MensRights14/04/19 12:13 PM
-5

I'm not interested enough to check what you have posted, so, I don't say you are a russian troll. But you acted exactly like one. Instead of a fair consideration of the facts and possibilities, you went straight to: Argh, but it's Sweden! Everybody knows Sweden is full of crazy, immoral people. Exactly like a Russian troll trying to smear western Europe would do. Thank you and good night. No need to continue unless you can tell me how's the weather over there. :D
/r/MensRights04/04/19 04:52 PM
-9

Yeah, yeah, but how's the weather?
/r/MensRights04/04/19 04:33 PM
-19

How's the weather over in St Petersburg? :D
/r/MensRights04/04/19 02:35 PM
1

Only if you are poor or otherwise clearly below a man who can talk to her. If you are way above even that, you pinch her bum.
/r/MensRights04/04/19 12:15 PM
-3

Russia is infamous for making these kinds of claims while trying to "raise patriotic awareness" among the Russian minorities in Europe. Children and their alleged mistreatment by the local authorities is one of their favorites although not the only one. Usually the outrageous claims are based on lies or - at best - half-truths. Perhaps something else is going on here but, knowing that this has happened over and over again, I'm very sceptical.
/r/MensRights04/04/19 08:19 AM
0

many if not most people have bought the Feminist narrative and they see a narrative that's questioning it as a hostile lie. This is the sorry truth.
/r/MensRights27/03/19 04:26 PM
1

Something could be done to make this sub more welcoming or at least not so hostile. An occasional person who comes here sees this place full of hostile lies because most people don't know all that much about the world, particularly not about things that have to do with equality and feminism. I don't know. Perhaps there should always be a sticky post about the true nature (?) of this sub. "You will probably find many angry people here, the same way as in any activist sub. Many men and women have …
/r/MensRights27/03/19 08:33 AM
1

They were conscious, willing, and aware until you drugged them?
/r/MensRights27/03/19 08:20 AM
2

Finland, which is sometimes credited for being the first European nation to give women the right to vote in 1906, gave men the same right in the 1940s after the war. Before that men who were conscripted couldn't vote. Nowadays men in the military can vote but still, only men are conscripted. It would be interesting to know if this is the common story, that actually women were given more rights than men during the early - or late - phases of the democratization process.
/r/MensRights27/03/19 07:17 AM
6

They have to invent "facts" because the real world is nothing like their worldview claims.
/r/MensRights27/03/19 05:26 AM
1

LOL! My bias is showing.
/r/MensRights27/03/19 05:20 AM
2

Finally, to come full circle, why can’t I find some good social science on this? That's because nobody wants to touch the subject even with a long stick. The perpetrators and victims just are wrong. Bring me a problem with suffering girls and evil men and the we can talk about grants and tenures.
/r/MensRights26/03/19 08:54 PM
2

A mean guy, huh? We have no idea why these queens started the wars. We just know they did. And because we don't know, the statistics are pretty useless. They just happen to tell, so to speak, that eating ice cream and drowning correlate with each other. Here are some possible causes: Queens didn't really govern but were more like figureheads. Queens had to show that they are more "manly" and willing to fight. Queens didn't understand politics and how to govern (being outsiders). Queens weren't t…
/r/MensRights26/03/19 08:16 PM
-7

the Mueller Report Has not been published. https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/mueller-report-release-813349/ On Sunday, Attorney General William Barr delivered a brief, narrow summary of Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s nearly two-year investigation into the Trump campaign’s relationship with Russia.
/r/MensRights26/03/19 07:14 PM
2

men are also much more capable of creating cooperative systems. Our civilization is based on cooperation.
/r/MensRights26/03/19 07:11 PM
2

Because we have no idea what that correlation means, I guess.
/r/MensRights26/03/19 07:10 PM
8

Following the politically correct narratives, like the ones Feminists spread, is our core value.
/r/MensRights26/03/19 06:53 PM
22

Women are far more sexist than men but it will never be part of the narrtaives our kids are taught.
/r/MensRights26/03/19 06:48 PM
5

The young men who fought the Nazis and Communists were useless.
/r/MensRights26/03/19 06:46 PM
6

She's a woman and as such always the victim.
/r/MensRights26/03/19 06:42 PM
1

That's not stupid, that's so crazy tha you must be joking, right?
/r/MensRights14/03/19 07:29 PM
1

This won't help you but it's good that it's not illegal. In places where it is, they still do it, discriminate against, men but it's hard to prove and people don't know about it.
/r/MensRights14/03/19 05:21 PM
20

Now, however, her story is falling apart, making her one of a small cohort of Me Tooers who increasingly seem to have fabricated components of their claims or told distorted half-truths. LOL
/r/MensRights14/03/19 05:14 PM
0

Here where I live almost nobody ever gets shot in the streets.
/r/MensRights14/03/19 04:31 PM
-1

Hmm, you're not somebody I'd like to meet with a gun in your hand. :D Learn to cool down. Where I live tha police almost never shoot anybody and the crooks almost never shoot the police - although the number of guns, rifles, mostly, is at the same level as in the USA: why? You would ask if you could think.
/r/MensRights13/03/19 07:44 PM
1

Sometimes hate, by ignorant assholes, can be funny,
/r/MensRights13/03/19 06:14 PM
2

Women are overrepresented in almost everything nowadays if they just want to be because the education system and employers favor them. Women are underrepresented in certain fields, like STEM, because there you have to know what you do. Favorism doesn't work.
/r/MensRights13/03/19 06:01 PM
1

The OECD publishes amazingly honest, non-feminist statistics on education (PISA) and the quality of life (Better Life Index). Try their site. Worldwide statistics are always untrustworthy because most of the countries are so messed up that there are no reliable data. And Feminism is always an issue. It corrupts the data the UN or organizations like the WEF gathers and publishes. And of course you already know about the Worl Bank, IMF and the CIA's publications
/r/MensRights13/03/19 05:05 PM
2

When people running on high adrenaline levels see you pull out a gun they'll probably kill you. As for the "somebody attacked you" being hard to prove, no, it's not.
/r/MensRights13/03/19 04:45 PM
8

People rush to judge men?
/r/MensRights13/03/19 04:13 PM
1

Truth seldom works in politics.
/r/MensRights13/03/19 04:06 PM
1

Do you have a source on scandinavia having three time higher domestic violence than australia? No.
/r/MensRights11/03/19 07:38 AM
1

Here's another life rule: Never believe any study on domestic violence or any other study with a Feminist agenda. Actually, people are always surprised when finding out how the world is because they believe in shitty, often feminist, narratives rather than facts. It's possible that Sweden is a violent place for women but probably it's just bullshit feminists have come up with.
/r/MensRights11/03/19 07:35 AM
3

Women are marvelous.
/r/MensRights11/03/19 07:12 AM
1

Yeah, the countries in which the health gap is among the smallest according to the WEF's Gender Gap Index.
/r/MensRights08/03/19 04:51 PM
1

It's totally colonialistically and imperialistically oppressive: Four of the languages come from Latin, the language of the Roman empire. Furthermore, two of those were spoken by the people who colonialized the southern parts of America enslaving and killing most of the natives. French isn't much better although they never managed to enslave a whole continent. Russian? you ask. Russian-speaking people took over so big area that Russia became the biggest country on earth. And don't get me started…
/r/MensRights08/03/19 02:41 PM
3

Leslie Margolis manages to contradict herself in the title. Not an easy task if you put any thinking into the process.
/r/MensRights07/03/19 07:35 AM
6

Women with large breasts get more tips from both men and women. So, it's a matter of definition if it's nicer service to let the customers see the breasts.
/r/MensRights06/03/19 06:52 AM
1

STEM = Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Here's the study (which isn't about the STEM, actually): The underrepresentation of women in academic science is typically attributed, both in scientific literature and in the media, to sexist hiring. Here we report five hiring experiments in which faculty evaluated hypothetical female and male applicants, using systematically varied profiles disguising identical scholarship, for assistant professorships in biology, engineering, economics…
/r/MensRights06/03/19 05:49 AM
1

If you feel like trash, talk to your therapist, not to the world.
/r/MensRights05/03/19 12:55 PM
3

Most significantly, it did not address ingrained issues that, according to workplace experts, cannot be overcome simply by considering how much different people are paid for doing the same job: Women and racial minorities often do not get the same opportunities and they must overcome certain biases when they are hired or compete for promotions. And after they find out that companies are giving actually more opportunities to women the "experts" will be once again surprised. They are always surpri…
/r/MensRights05/03/19 06:13 AM
5

It's interesting that Google published this study instead of burying it or lying about the findings. It's like the company is fed up with the feminist agenda and declared war against it.
/r/MensRights05/03/19 05:59 AM
6

They are always surprised because they believe in lies.
/r/MensRights05/03/19 05:52 AM
1

Perhaps a feminist would say that it's women, no other group, that are actually taking over in universities and many other places. No single ethnic minority is doing that on a large scale in places where "whites" used to dominate. (The whole argument about men feeling threatened is silly because it assumes that men were and are a class with similar attitudes and objectives. But then again feminists are silly so ...)
/r/MensRights05/03/19 05:48 AM
4

If they were embarrassed about the first video they would probably take it down from their website. https://gillette.com/en-us/the-best-men-can-be
/r/MensRights04/03/19 06:39 AM
3

The ad can still be found on their site and the video seems to be the flagship of the campaign.
/r/MensRights04/03/19 06:35 AM
28

The passage, which appears to be taken from a “multicultural education series” book entitled Is Everyone Equal, Actually, the name seems to be: Is Everyone Really Equal by Sensoy and DiAngelo. Google can be your friend.
/r/MensRights04/03/19 05:47 AM
13

So, if a woman in a position of power, let's say a judge or employer, acts in a sexist way she not really doing it because her position is, er, what? A mirage? Whatever it is, it's also racist and sexist.
/r/MensRights04/03/19 05:41 AM
1

I'm just being logical. Not my fault if it's hard for some people.
/r/MensRights04/03/19 05:22 AM
-2

Because they were telling about somebody they didn't have a picture of?
/r/MensRights03/03/19 06:22 PM
-4

How do you know it's her? That picture could be anyone, after all. Are there more photos somewhere proving that the woman in the picture is her? Not that it makes any difference ... i.e. whatever.
/r/MensRights03/03/19 05:12 PM
2

I suppose that "purposeful" is the keyword to ponder here?
/r/MensRights03/03/19 12:36 PM
17

Because unsuspecting women or girls could be exposed to male penises.
/r/MensRights03/03/19 12:22 PM
28

A true gender scholar: being surprised that men feel uncomfortable in a unisex toilet. Gender scholars could be even defined by not understanding men In my estimation, we are unlikely to see broad adoption of multi-user unisex restrooms anytime soon. The controversy over unisex single-user restrooms suggests that we are far from an era of gender-neutral toileting. She assumes that men's opinions would mater in these kinds of questions. More gender scholarly ignorance.
/r/MensRights03/03/19 12:19 PM
-4

Perhaps they didn't have a photo of her?
/r/MensRights03/03/19 09:52 AM
8

Depends on who says it and in what context Oh—I—oh—I—oh—I—oh—I I'm in love with your body
/r/MensRights02/03/19 07:04 AM
1

Thanks again, it's worth listening to. Here's an abstract of the Theory of Dyadic Morality (by Kurt Gray) that is referred to in the podcast. Reinventing Moral Judgment Abstract The nature of harm—and therefore moral judgment—may be misunderstood. Rather than an objective matter of reason, we argue that harm should be redefined as an intuitively perceived continuum. This redefinition provides a new understanding of moral content and mechanism—the constructionist Theory of Dyadic Morality (TDM). …
/r/MensRights01/03/19 09:15 AM
3

Thanks. It's one of the countless studies that was surprised to find out that feminists are wrong. But kudos to them for not burying it. It got published even if with the typical "yes we know that women are oppressed and the results here are weird and controversial" preface. then they go on explaining what they expected to find (that women, as an oppressed group, would feel less ingroup bias compared to men who are a dominant group). The results are interesting, though. Not surprising (of course…
/r/MensRights01/03/19 08:05 AM
4

I'd like to find a study that backs this up either directly or indirectly. By the way, feminists seem to hate particularly the men at the top.
/r/MensRights01/03/19 06:22 AM
5

What's that? What does the text mean? Where is it going? The address hobus.es takes here: https://www.citizengo.org/hazteoir/pc/168830-fuera-leyes-que-adoctrinan-odian-y-discriminan
/r/MensRights01/03/19 05:52 AM
11

Yeah, and there is no exact number. Many, probably most rapes, that the police hear of, are ambiguous affairs: what happened, was I raped, did I rape, how fucking drunk was, did I want it and so forth.
/r/MensRights28/02/19 07:37 PM
9

No, she's not, the violence monopoly is going to hand it over to her.
/r/MensRights26/02/19 06:02 AM
8

Bezos is going to lose half of everything he owns
/r/MensRights26/02/19 05:58 AM
3

Yeah, it says a lot about women if true: for eons women have sexually preferred certain kinds of men, and thus through evolution produced those men, they now say they hate. Now I just have to make this into a meme ... Hmmm
/r/MensRights25/02/19 09:26 AM
0

But men do have stronger bones, both by size and make-up. And muscles that hold the skeleton together and bones intact are stronger. The reason is among other things to compensate for the bigger mass. I seem to remember that women in combat roles get much more likely bone fractures ... but then again there are too many variables to say anything with absolute certainty. I mean, it surely is at least theoretically possible that, compared to a woman, a man with 20% more mas has a body structure tha…
/r/MensRights25/02/19 09:14 AM
22

Typical doubletalk: Majorities are minorities, exclusion is inclusion, war is peace.
/r/MensRights25/02/19 08:38 AM
1

What's her point? That the mom was particularly stupid? Women in general are stupid?
/r/MensRights25/02/19 08:33 AM
1

That's an interesting point. I would have assumed that the stronger body structure (bones and muscles mostly) would compensate for that and even make men more "durable". Namely, it sounds counter-productive to have the sex that has faced most "accident hazards" have weaker bodies in that sense. If I'm right, another question arises. Did carmakers choose to use male dummies (if they did) in order to be able to manufacture cheaper cars i.e. cars with fewer and weaker safety features?
/r/MensRights25/02/19 08:17 AM
2

Sometimes feminists sell directly, sometimes not. But that is a minor point in the bigger scheme of the things. Most boycotts I recall were caused by people getting pissed off what, apparently, immoral people did within companies.
/r/MensRights01/02/19 02:59 PM
3

They are selling therapies (APA), social services, child care, books, films and other media products, ads (Gilette), PR, lobbying. Almost anything can be sold with a feminist theme. But they are also "selling" political parties, policies, even laws to the public. If, say, they try to sell a law, first they get paid for lobbying for it and then, after the law gets passed, for watching over the implementation. Many firms or organizations, like the WEF, have both feminist and other businesses. You …
/r/MensRights01/02/19 01:20 PM
3

You can't change anybody's deep-rooted convictions, let alone identity, by being polite. By saying harsh words there is a small chance that somebody sees a little glimmer of light because the words are disturbing. Perhaps somebody somewhere reads what I write and starts to think other thoughts than what the "society" teaches to think since childhood. That's what happened to me, a former feminist sympathizer.
/r/MensRights09/12/18 08:52 AM
2

This is what I said (once): feminism is often a zero-sum game, taking away from men to and giving to women. Perhaps you disagree or have changed your opinion already. And naturally, I know many feminists who aren't evil, they just tend to be misguided.
/r/MensRights09/12/18 08:41 AM
7

Yeah, that's what they tell you. I know too much about feminism, you know next to nothing. I dare you to watch the movies But, yeah, you won't. And the movie - with a rating of 8.4 - isn't even going to the real depths of the rabbit hole. It just talks about the obvious problems men have and how feminists fight against the people who talk about them. Deep down the rabbit hole there are problems that threaten to crash the civilization as we know it. but why would I talk to a feminist, an enemy ab…
/r/MensRights09/12/18 08:26 AM
7

There's a really good movie about the misconceptions you and so many other people have. It's about a woman who starts off as a feminist but in the end turns away. If you watch it with and keep your attitude open - I don't see how you could reach a different conclusion. It's IMDB rating is 8.4. https://www.imdb.com/title/tt3686998/ Of course I understand that if you have invested a lot into being a feminist, no facts, no moral bankruptcy can change your mind. Or so it might look like. But many, l…
/r/MensRights09/12/18 08:05 AM
3

It's stupid to claim that giving privileges to one group couldn't take away the rights of another group. that's actually what feminists say when they want the better-off sex to have even more rights and privileges. "We want quotas for women but that's not away from men", for example. A totally stupid/dishonest argument. "We want men to be seen as the violent party in all domestic violence situations, but that's good for everybody." That kind of dihonesty/stupidity is the way feminists work. The …
/r/MensRights09/12/18 07:53 AM
8

It's hard to work with somebody who loathes and fears you because of your sex. Yes, not all feminists loath men but the number of those who do is significant.
/r/MensRights09/12/18 07:41 AM
2

It's is a well-researched fact that we, the humankind, tend to see even a minor negativity towards women as sexism. It's a bias in our thinking and it partly explains why women are so much better off.
/r/MensRights09/12/18 07:38 AM
1

The government does give money away. There are people who have lived off welfare for decades, I've read. I know a person who gets about 700 euros a month plus his rent paid (partly, I guess). He saves every month a couple of hundred euros and doesn't seem to be particularly poor. That's not what I'm doing but if I decided to stop working altogether I could and still live a happy life. I'm pretty sure of that. But, of course, this is not how the system works everywhere.
/r/MensRights09/12/18 06:48 AM
12

The most harmful thing has been lying about domestic violence. It's been going on for decades destroying the trust between people and the moral fabric of societies. Something similar happened in the Third Reich when the Nazis decided to demonize the Jews.
/r/MensRights08/12/18 10:14 PM
1

Thanks for the answer, I'll try to keep it in mind. It was a sincere answer to a sincere question. There's no way that anyone could argue, based on the quality of life statistics, that women are worse off. We know it. But the world doesn't And, to be Frank, I think that in wealthy countries there is enough money for everyone to live a happy life unless you completely mess up - or have all too high expectations. I - how should I put this - have limited resources but live better than kings a coupl…
/r/MensRights08/12/18 10:02 PM
2

But don't move here unless you like the sun rising above the horizon nine o'clock. :D But thanks for the nice words.
/r/MensRights08/12/18 09:36 PM
1

Meritocracy, people who deserve to be successful get to be successful. My son is successful while I'm not. The difference between us is that he has worked hard for success while I spend my time here. :D My son studied economics. He told that men tend to study the "cold" subjects that can lead you to big money. Women tend to study things that are more "humane". More men tend to get rich, more women tend to get happy? Where's the problem?
/r/MensRights08/12/18 09:25 PM
2

It's one of the Nordic countries, Finland, and although Newsweek once chose it the best country in the world - it's not, far from it - or if it is, the rest of the world is really shitty. :D
/r/MensRights08/12/18 09:07 PM
0

I imply all the time that people don't understand because they don't. I never imply that they could be triggered because I assume that even stupid people are adults. And, by the way, you obviously aren't stupid. "Oppression"? One of the most common arguments (right after misogyny, perhaps) against people who don't think that Feminism is good for us, people, is to claim that we, as the oppressors, feel that taking away the alleged privileges feel like oppression. Perhaps you didn't use these tact…
/r/MensRights08/12/18 08:57 PM
3

Well, to say to somebody that he's not talking rationally because he's "triggered" or because he feels "oppressed" aren't compliments - as you must perfectly well know. But I'm ready to regard this as one of the social media confusions that are so common. What I know and what you perhaps don't know is that men's roles are partly enforced by women (and the game theoretical consequences of their needs and wants). That's something I know to be true, so, that's something that will remain true and ca…
/r/MensRights08/12/18 08:20 PM
2

To get triggered is something I never do. That's because I'm an adult and know that not everything is peaches and cream. People have different opinions. different lives. If I didn't accept that, I would go crazy or become a gender study professor in a US university. :D By the way, you managed to insult me twice. Are you saying that you didn't do it on purpose?
/r/MensRights08/12/18 07:55 PM
1

It makes you lose the faith in humanity, doesn't it? Every modern generation has been lured into some kind of a moral bankruptcy. And I'm afraid it's not getting better. "The Negroes are animals, the Jews are evil, the capitalists are selfish destroyers of the civilization, the men are demons." But women are wonderful :D
/r/MensRights08/12/18 07:35 PM
1

In our apartment building, there was a fire a few years back. Later on the firemen came to measure out possible monoxide poisoning. My wife was so thrilled by the good-looking firemen in uniforms that she couldn't help but tell me how good they looked. I thought they looked weary and dirty.
/r/MensRights08/12/18 04:17 PM
1

I don't know where you got the oppression argument from. My argument is simply: women like men in uniforms, men respond by wearing uniforms or uniform-kind of clothes. As I said the question is complicated and I don't claim to know the truth. But what I said is without any doubt one reason. Here's a guy who has written more about how the sexes have developed to appeal to the the "opposite" sex. http://www.roybaumeister.com/ If you think that the evolution is speculations, then I can't help. :D
/r/MensRights08/12/18 04:12 PM
14

The role of men and why it's is so much more narrow than the role of women is a complicated question. Where does it come from? One reason is without any doubt women who sexually prefer manly men. That again has made men through millennia adopt strategies that - game theoretically - are the best for the mating success. Wearing a "uniform" tells a woman that this guy means business and is no clown. Wearing something like women wear would tell the opposite.
/r/MensRights08/12/18 03:28 PM
1

Here where I live, certain immigrant men sexually abused a girl. I think she would have benefited from special protection. To argument well an morally right is a life-long effort. Most people never "get there".
/r/MensRights07/12/18 09:39 PM
1

In practice (ànd perhaps in theory. too), I think that teen girls should be protected more furiously than teen boys. Perhaps women should be protected more than men. But most problems gravitate towards boys and men. what about them? The homeless as a protected class, for example?
/r/MensRights07/12/18 09:15 PM
2

So, the angle raped her?
/r/MensRights07/12/18 08:13 PM
2

LOL, it's a rape, no question about it.
/r/MensRights07/12/18 08:10 PM
4

Probably so. nevertheless, there are all kinds of services, like Youtube, that pays minimally and services that pay nothing. But, yeah, if she has made a deal, that's naturally OK. Stupid to suggest that there could be something wrong.
/r/MensRights07/12/18 07:34 PM
4

Works. But does Cassey get any money?
/r/MensRights07/12/18 06:05 PM
13

Started watching it: "Men who are married to women like you just wanna die earlier" Priceless! ;D
/r/MensRights07/12/18 04:40 PM
4

Amazon seems to demand that you don't "log in" through the Amazon site. If you do, there are restrictions that don't apply if you go directly to www.primevideo.com
/r/MensRights07/12/18 04:23 PM
8

Yeah, I can watch it. So, I assume everybody in the countries mentioned above can watch it (for free if you don't have an Amazon account and try it for free). and this wasn't a paid advertisement. :D The movie just happened to become available. Kudos to Amazon.
/r/MensRights07/12/18 04:15 PM
12

The Red Pill will be available for a limited time on Amazon Prime in the following territories: US, UK, Australia, Canada, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Iceland, Ireland, Netherlands, Norway, and Sweden. But it's not in Finland - or I'm not able to find for some strange reason. Edit "will be". Ok, ok, I'm not this stupid, I'll look into it and let you know.
/r/MensRights07/12/18 03:52 PM
0

So you were just being rude, is that your excuse? If I didn't know that people are mostly very stupid. I'd b insullted, LOL.
/r/MensRights07/12/18 01:39 PM
1

Crazy. And stop putting words into my mouth.
/r/MensRights05/12/18 09:57 PM
2

Who has said the Feminist movement has done nothing? You, not me. A toxic attitude to put words into my mouth. The movement that took place swept through the whole society and the feminist movement played along, not among the most important players but nevertheless. Nobody who has any idea of the time period would say that feminists did nothing, a crazy idea.
/r/MensRights22/11/18 09:16 AM
0

my actual rights (owning property, being able to vote, having a legally protected right say no to sex with my husband, my right to have more control over my body, etc) that have been historically fought for and earned by feminism. That's how it went only according to the Feminist history writing (which can be found in school books and elsewhere, too). How and why the countries in the west became democratized and governments started to give people, not just women, rights and liberties, is another…
/r/MensRights21/11/18 08:59 PM
7

They seem to celebrate matriarchy and get ready for it and hate patriarchy and fight it. Not that we'd live in a patriarchy or that a matriarchy would be coming. Disgusting people with crazy theories and double standards.
/r/MensRights21/11/18 08:17 AM
2

I thought this was a place where you share information that can be used in simple arguments for political purposes. Political arguments are always simple, aren't they? :D The satisfaction and happiness surveys are what they are. Surveys in general are what they are. Once I thought that it's somehow important to know what people say, if they feel happy and stuff ... not so much anymore. One example: "I", my "happy identity", is perhaps just a narrative or a "castle, surrounded by walls" that is h…
/r/MensRights20/11/18 09:20 PM
2

The Peter Pan Syndrom: let's all stay children!
/r/MensRights20/11/18 08:04 PM
2

make them yourself, it's easy (if the statistics are available). if not, sorry I bothered you.
/r/MensRights20/11/18 07:32 PM
4

If you look at the countries where the general satisfaction is above the average, here are the countries where the gap (always in favor of women) seems to be remarkedly above the average gap (it's a graph and I didn't look up the actual numbers so it's an estimate made by my glance): Finland, Canada, USA, Ireland, Great Britain.
/r/MensRights20/11/18 07:05 PM
1

Yeah, then again my son served in a hospital and got, apparently, good vibes out of it, helping people and stuff. But had he refused to serve even in the hospital he would have ended up in jail (or not actually a prison with walls and cells but a place from where you are not allowed to leave for six months without a good reason like studying or working.
/r/MensRights19/11/18 04:35 PM
2

About 80% thinks the system is just fine, men more than women. It's strange if you think that it contradicts the Finnish constitution and the Treaties of the European Union (although there naturally is a legal explanation why it, allegedly, doesn't).
/r/MensRights19/11/18 01:21 PM
1

I think you have to move outside the EU. I don't know if that ever has been tested, tho.
/r/MensRights19/11/18 01:20 PM
1

It's not on the political agenda. Things that rise to the agenda outside the government/cabinet (which has a common program to follow) usuallý concern women. No men's issues ever really rise to the agenda although a while back two or three leading politicians mentioned the poor educational achievements of boys ("who's gonna pay the pensions when we let boys fall behind"). But even that didn't fly - although it must among the biggest problems the country faces, perhaps the biggest. So, the way th…
/r/MensRights19/11/18 12:42 PM
3

And if you tell them about the massive "equality problems" certain men have, and to some extent all men have, they just ignore it and say that it's men's own fault of the fault of the so-called patriarchy. That's, of course, ridiculous and a total double standard. We know that we can blame women even, their "biological" and other expectations, the fact that they have a strong in-group bias, that they instinctively value men lower, that they are interested sexually in certain kinds of men (which …
/r/MensRights19/11/18 08:32 AM
4

During the WWII some countries remained free and were not taken over by the Nazis or Commies because they had conscription armies.
/r/MensRights19/11/18 05:28 AM
3

He probably thinks he's above all other men and those things aren't affecting him in any way. But, yeah, I hate these sexists. Everybody should - but instead, they are admired.
/r/MensRights18/11/18 10:17 AM
3

Why the educations gap is not mentioned? It must be the biggest problem because it affects many other things in a meritocracy like the USA. What happened to the American dream which demands equal opportunities? Am I missing something or is this a politically motivated move to dismiss the biggest problem?
/r/MensRights18/11/18 10:07 AM
-6

OK. Where I live it's different. If you are diagnosed mentally ill the police won't tell your name until you are convicted.
/r/MensRights16/11/18 05:31 PM
-19

Yeah, but is that the reason why her name was no published?
/r/MensRights16/11/18 04:29 PM
-43

Perhaps she is not charged with a crime because she is insane?
/r/MensRights16/11/18 03:57 PM
-1

What?!?! Does that make any sense?
/r/MensRights16/11/18 01:34 PM
2

Although the horniness difference between men and women might not be that big it, nevertheless, explains about 52% of the society. :D But, frankly, women aren't according to studies a horny as men unless they are in love. Men, on the other hand - and unfortunately - tend to be horny always and, thus, are willing to give women what they want because of and through complex psychological mechanisms that are based in the end on horniness.
/r/MensRights16/11/18 01:07 PM
1

Pretty much every day now a female teacher is being accused of raping a boy, or having a "sex romp" with a boy, Hmm, every day? It would be interesting if somebody studied how often this happens, become news. Every week? Is it an American problem, or do female teachers "have sex romps" in other countries, as well? How do you even study something like that? But, yeah, you're absolutely right that we don't judge the wrongdoings of women the same way as we do those of men.
/r/MensRights16/11/18 12:50 PM
9

Yeah, those who earn more pay taxes more, and progressively more, in all civilized countries. And men earn more. The other side of the story is that women tend to get more subsidies because, well, because people tend to think that they deserve them more than men.
/r/MensRights16/11/18 12:35 PM
14

This is true in Finland, too, and probably in all countries. "Fortunately" this is going to change, the way the education system discriminates against boys.
/r/MensRights16/11/18 10:07 AM
2

Only a nazi or stalinist, or communist would ask if the killing of my relatives was justified. Sorry, have to go to the toilet to vomit. You sick people!
/r/MensRights15/11/18 09:48 PM
1

Yeah, the /r/ILoveNazis is cool too. As somebody who's Finnish relatives were killed during the purges. Who was worse Hitler or Stalin?
/r/MensRights15/11/18 08:54 PM
1

Rather, "which" are the anti-equality subs?
/r/MensRights15/11/18 11:44 AM
2

Apparently, the laws and official practices are gender neutral in Australia. I mean, in Finland, and many other places, it would be impossible to give people the right to "declare" their gender because then men could avoid the mandatory military service.
/r/MensRights15/11/18 09:05 AM
10

So the test for misandry to join the list would be the same as for any other form of hate: is there evidence of a serious problem with men being stalked, beaten up by strangers on the street, having bricks chucked through their windows or being otherwise persecuted by women motivated by dislike or contempt for men in general? No. but there are no such things against women either. Feminism, and the Guardian, is an insult against common sense.
/r/MensRights14/11/18 09:07 PM
8

"Gender equality authorities" tend to be 90-100% female. The odd men are feminist cucks.
/r/MensRights14/11/18 04:44 PM
3

Let's ask what problems most men or boys face for just being boys or men. Most men who are in jail, for example, chose the lifestyle but completely innocent boys get discriminated against in schools. And that discrimination can have a huge effect on their lives.
/r/MensRights13/11/18 05:13 AM
6

It's kinda crazy to say to somebody: be prepared to die for us but don't expect to have the same rights, as those who aren't, have.
/r/MensRights11/11/18 04:26 PM
3

In Finnish? https://fi.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suomen_%C3%A4%C3%A4nioikeuden_historia
/r/MensRights11/11/18 03:56 PM
1

I still don't see it. Feminists are just one group that think that men are bad. There are a lot of women - and men - who think that men or masculinity is something you can despise. It's a widespread meme - that partly originates from the experiences of many teenage girls who want the same alpha males who betray or the children of single moms who think the men don't love them but leave or the mainstream media telling how bad men are. Those people, for example, can become feminists but not necessa…
/r/MensRights11/11/18 12:34 PM
1

How was this post framed as anti-feminist? I don't see it. Or do you mean to say that only feminist think that men are bad?
/r/MensRights11/11/18 10:28 AM
1

That's the reflex, the subconscious attitude that explains why we often tend to favor women, why "the society" wants to help women more than men. And that explains why feminism is popular, too.
/r/MensRights11/11/18 10:25 AM
9

Yeah. Then again, after the WWII there must have been people who saw that men who had died in masses should have the vote. Voting is, after all, above all something that gives the legitimacy to the government.
/r/MensRights11/11/18 10:13 AM
2

No group gets the same support as women, at least in the west. Well, excluding young children - and girls even when they grow older. Not even the poor or otherwise underprivileged, particularly if they are boys and men. But, hey, the world we live in is not about what's fair but what people, the majority of voters think is unfair. And what seems unfair is when the weak are treated bad. And how do we know if this group but not that one is treated badly? We know it when the mainstream media tells …
/r/MensRights01/11/18 09:09 AM
1

Not genocide - even feminists don't want to kill all men - but I'm sure that feminist-minded people have killed individual men and boys more than anybody knows.
/r/MensRights30/10/18 06:33 AM
24

They don't even know how to google, apparently. It took me a couple of minutes to find out that there are studies about "paraphilic disorders" among women, the kind of disorders that "don't exsist". Here's one: The scientific literature on paraphilias has focussed almost exclusively on men. When women whose behaviour might imply paraphilia are discussed, it is mainly in terms of their victimization at the hands of men with paraphilic disorders. The three most common paraphilic disorders in the f…
/r/MensRights28/10/18 08:32 AM
1

One word: decadence.
/r/MensRights27/10/18 07:43 PM
1

Those who have the power can set the rules. What can men do? Fuck them! Fuc the powerful! That didn't come out right. :P
/r/MensRights27/10/18 07:19 PM
3

I'm afraid of this kind of sexism because it's undermining the foundations of civilization. Honestly. The more we let these hatemongers determine how to speak about men the more men will opt out the more they will get marginalized. And the civilized world runs on men's willingness to make sacrifices, do good for others.
/r/MensRights27/10/18 05:51 PM
57

When the Sun King of France was a baby his nurses sucked his cock to make it erect. And then marvelled it in excitement. In India there is a culture where mothers are supposed to "play" in an erotic way with baby boys. It's a strange world. , But perhaps the weirdest thing so far is a judge who thinks that no woman under any circumstances wants to touch a child in a sexual manner. The judge should get her head examined.
/r/MensRights26/10/18 06:30 AM
12

The study confuses equality with female privilege. When women have much better opportunities it shouldn't be called equality, einsteins!
/r/MensRights25/10/18 06:17 PM
-2

It's self-evident that boys need more attention. Girls are more docile and they are better than boys in most subjects (on average, of course). Why on earth would a teacher spend more time with somebody who willingly, dilligently and skilfully does what she is asked to do compared to somebody who doesn't?!
/r/MensRights21/10/18 08:25 PM
3

It's good from the feminist viewpoint that women have more freedom of choice than men. But it's also good that, when they exercise their freedom, they'll end up in fields that don't pay as much as the field men work in. That way women can have happier lives without losing their victimhood.
/r/MensRights21/10/18 08:21 PM
4

I'm not sure if these "more equal countries" are actually more equal. In many ways they have become more unequal. That has happened because of many reasons but particularly because the educations systems favor girls and women. I just happened to read an article about how girls in "equal countries" and particularly in Finland avoid technical education. That's because they can, said an expert. Girls are in Finland (according to PISA) better at everything but they are even more better at other subj…
/r/MensRights21/10/18 08:16 PM
-7

Boys tend to need more attention because they are more trouble.
/r/MensRights21/10/18 07:48 PM
1

This infobox was in the middle of the article, there are feminists everywhere, remember to fight them or they'll win: How to spot signs of domestic abuse Do you suspect that a friend or relative is being abused? These are the five questions to ask yourself. By Richinda Taylor of Eva Women’s Aid Has she withdrawn from social life? If she is no longer attending social events or welcoming visitors to her home, this is one of the telltale signs. Likewise, if she only ever leaves home with her potent…
/r/MensRights15/10/18 09:25 AM
3

It sounds like somebody who's getting insane and being dazed and confused - and projecting the sentiments toward somebody she has learned to despise. Hopefully, her husband uses the opportunity and gets a divorce before he must take care of a feminist monster who has always hated him. It's nice when the mainstream media publishes anti-feminist stuff - perhaps without knowing it. Or perhaps they knew exactly what they were doing.
/r/MensRights15/10/18 04:42 AM
6

The Jews, it's always the Jews. Adolf
/r/MensRights14/10/18 04:42 PM
2

Certainly you must know that there are reasons (religion, ethnicity, tradition). You happen to end up in an elevator with a Jew or Muslin, or somebody sympathetic toward multiculturalism and such things this pitch won't work.
/r/MensRights08/10/18 07:22 AM
7

Women have been telling that they feel more afraid than men for ages - and also in places where violence against women is very rare. In Finland it's very unlikely for a woman to face violence in the streets. Nevertheless, women here are afraid to walk alone after dark. One scholar pondered what the reason could be and concluded: women are afraid of the unknown. In other words, they don't think about real likelihoods but the possible threats in the dark. And why not, the media, TV everybody is te…
/r/MensRights20/09/18 04:29 PM
2

The maps suggest that the longes annual leave is at a maximum 28 days. In Finland it's 4-5 weeks (plus holidays) depending on where you work.
/r/MensRights18/09/18 01:10 PM
1

Over here it's 54 days but you have to live on social welfare money, the employer doesn't have to pay you anything.
/r/MensRights18/09/18 01:04 PM
1

What's strange, tho, is that the algorithm should notice that antifeministisk or antifeministinen can't mean anti-FBI unless it has seen anti-FBI over and over again with words that have to do with the sexes and feminism. Another explanation is that a person who oversees the translations (yes, there are such people) tells the algorithm to use that exact word. Of course it's possible that something else is going on, too. Wikipedia: Google Neural Machine Translation GNMT improves on the quality of…
/r/MensRights18/09/18 12:23 PM
6

Probably somebody realized that if the laws were made gender-neutral Feminist would lose one of their main weapons: hate-speech. And in the Nordic countries laws tend to be very gender-neutral.
/r/MensRights18/09/18 11:47 AM
1

So, are you saying that somebody has "corrected" anti-feminism with all kinds of wrong words, like anti-FBI, anti-seminarian, anti-federal etc both in Finnish and Swedish pages (and perhaps in other languages too)? But only on certain pages because some of the time the translator know the correct translation If so, the algorithm is truly poor - and somebody has noticed it and sabotaged the translator on purpose. Or the "AI" has gone crazy already. :D By the way, Google Translate works great betw…
/r/MensRights18/09/18 11:16 AM
2

It looks more like it'd be the work of "subversive forces", people who are fighting the "SJWs" within Google.
/r/MensRights18/09/18 09:45 AM
2

Because I know that lazy and ignorant people like you don't understand that there are different kinds of sciences taught and studied, I particularly mentioned that I was talking about the social sciences. Stupid people can claim on the internet to the end of the world that social sciences don't exist but that doesn't make them disappear. Neither will the fact that women are better off - according to scientific studies and statistics - disappear even though stupid people immersed in the hegemonic…
/r/MensRights18/09/18 08:24 AM
1

For example, I find it hard to imagine that a man could have the right to abort his baby, i.e. force the mother go through an abortion. (I corrected "reproduction" to "reproductive" in my post above.)
/r/MensRights18/09/18 07:14 AM
4

There are two more incidents in the original source. One professor got reported by a muslim student when he (according to the source) talked about religion as a social phenomenon. Another professor canceled his course because students demanded that the course literature should be by female writers as often as by male writers. This time the problem was (translated mostly by Google): [the lectures] embodies Hesslow's own personal anti-feminist agenda, and that neither biological differences betwee…
/r/MensRights18/09/18 07:06 AM
1

Reproductive rights hardly can be exactly the same.
/r/MensRights18/09/18 05:55 AM
1

If you take the scientific indicators of welfare and quality of life and then compare women to men it's very clear which sex is far better-off ("scientific" refers here to social sciences, naturally). And, so, women are on average happier, too. But the gynocentric narrative is one of the main narratives people share. And it lies that the world is the other way around, it's women who are worse-off and should be helped and protected. And when they are helped and protected they'll get even more bet…
/r/MensRights18/09/18 04:52 AM
1

Certain things feel disgusting for a reason. If diseases spread in a place like this "brothel", it's a public health issue, not an individual rights issue, let alone men's rights issue.
/r/MensRights18/09/18 04:26 AM
2

Etymology From French féminisme circa 1837, ultimately from Latin fēminīnus, from fēmina (“woman”). First recorded in English in 1851, originally meaning "the state of being feminine." Sense of "advocacy of women's rights" is from 1895.
/r/MensRights17/09/18 05:36 PM
1

This is a new business: Nobody's sure how it should be treated. I, for one, would never put my dick into a doll, if several men had been ejaculating into it. Yikes. It's better that the place stays closed until it's certain that you can't get HIV, for example, from the dolls.
/r/MensRights17/09/18 03:33 PM
39

More surprising were the male responses. Sixty-one percent of male respondents believe that Pekgoz’s complaint has at least some grounds, while 12 percent of the 61 percent claim that the complaint is absolutely justified, and 26 percent responded that they have been sexually discriminated against on campus. It's surprising because you live in a gynocentric dream world which prevents you from seeing how the world looks like for the worse-off gender.
/r/MensRights17/09/18 12:18 PM
23

Feminists and even non-feminist women have worked hard to establish a gynocentric education system. Anything that threatens it must be attacked by all means possible.
/r/MensRights17/09/18 11:37 AM
19

They let a feminist professor talk as if she was a reliable and rational person. LOL.
/r/MensRights17/09/18 11:34 AM
11

So long as the education system favors girls and women something should be done.
/r/MensRights17/09/18 11:33 AM
1

So much aggression and stupidity. :D
/r/MensRights02/09/18 05:33 PM
1

They are minors according to the law, not children. Children are, as far as I know, below the age of puberty, not yet teens, they haven't yet reached their youth, about 0-10 or 12 years old.
/r/MensRights02/09/18 04:55 PM
5

A real game changer would be if the law demanded in addition that the woman must be given the main responsibility of a vital strategic area (like marketing, production etc). If a woman was not given any real responsibility but just hang around, perhaps cooking coffee or something like that, the rest of the board would be jailed. :D
/r/MensRights02/09/18 01:04 PM
2

That could be a headline in the Huffington Post or the Guardian.
/r/MensRights02/09/18 07:26 AM
10

Feminist logic, LOL. And feminist knowledge: they don't know, as usual, the difference between the wage gap (that doesn't exist) and the earnings gap (which exists but isn't really considered unfair outside feminist theories).
/r/MensRights02/09/18 07:06 AM
1

It's not matriarchy but the business logic of the insurance companies. They put customers in different risk categories based on what they know and what they are "allowed to know" by the law. So, they put smokers in a different, more expensive category than non-smokers. If the law allows it, they put women in a different category than men because women, for example, tend to live longer than men - or drive more cautiously. Of course, a company could try to compete by granting men and women car ins…
/r/MensRights02/09/18 06:53 AM
4

This festival was a reaction against certain disturbances that happened when over 100 000 young men came to Sweden as asylum seekers in 2016-17. They came from countries where most dealings between young men and women are very much restricted. And then these, often scantily dressed women, freely moving in crowds. Perhaps something was bound to happen. And it did. But blaming it on this cultural crash would be impossible. So, they did what is politically correct: blamed it on men. Besides, the wa…
/r/MensRights02/09/18 06:23 AM
1

She's a pedophile What do you mean? I haven't followed the news much but has she in any way shown sexual interest in children? Or do you mean that a 17-year old is a child?
/r/MensRights02/09/18 05:23 AM
-3

Out of interest: what do you think about the age of consent in California (18) compared to the rest of the civilized world where it's mostly 15-17? Should that be taken into account or is it totally irrelevant? Could a law be immoral if, for example, it puts men, in particular, in danger of a long prison sentence because you can't often tell if a girl is 16 or 18 or even 26?
/r/MensRights02/09/18 05:17 AM
8

When women plan to have a good time they want men around, not just women. If they are single, they want men for romantic and erotic purposes - or because men can make them laugh and feel good often much better than women. If they aren't single, they want their partners along. The same goes for men (except for the laughing part). The segregation of the sexes is a silly idea that'll fly as a novelty and protest or for certain lesbian groups but it's not going to be a trend - any more than stop eat…
/r/MensRights02/09/18 04:53 AM
2

Women tend to be the happier sex in almost all surveys. I wonder if girls find happiness later in life or is there a shift taking place so that the happiness gap is closing.
/r/MensRights01/09/18 05:00 PM
2

Most heavily marginalized people, alcoholics, and drug abusers are men, too.
/r/MensRights01/09/18 08:17 AM
1

It's useless to engage in a discussion with that kind of people who have no idea of what is fair and reasonable. https://quillette.com/2018/04/12/sam-harris-right-ezra-klein-know-better/ But if you know how to play the media game you can end up winning in the google results. And that's pretty much the most important thing. Elam didn't and lost.
/r/MensRights01/09/18 06:28 AM
3

I think it's possible that in the future we'll look back and see that this was the time when men started to leave tasks that could be affected by feminist/SJW opinions and demands. Feminist-minded people took over and the men - and probably even some women - went working for the private sector.
/r/MensRights01/09/18 06:16 AM
8

In Sweden they very actively favor women when it comes to public funding. That must mean that at times male directors, who are a clear majority, just can't get any money because the film Institute have a 50/50 quota to fill. And, in my opinion, that must mean that good Swedish male directors and other filmmakers slowly but surely will move where money is and that's away from Sweden. In the long run, can the policy mean anything else than a drop in quality? It's the same in many other countries b…
/r/MensRights01/09/18 06:11 AM
0

Strangely enough, this time their enemy isn't white men or white straight men the way it usually is. I suppose that as a feminist you can fear and loathe all men, too, if the need arises. And this time it arose because of reasons they can't talk about.
/r/MensRights31/08/18 08:30 PM
-1

There are very few people who actually hate an entire sex, half of the humankind, their loved ones, brothers and sisters, mothers and fathers. But perhaps there is more hatred toward men than women. Hard to say for sure, though. It's not unheard of that a man feels, at least, very bitter toward women, sometimes even angry.
/r/MensRights31/08/18 08:16 PM
1

There is a study that found out that it's easier for a woman in the USA to get elected. There seems to a be an older study that found out that it's as easy to get elected but that's not the study I'm talking about. But I don't seem to able to find with a quick search. But I found this instead. I didn't read it so I don't if it's feminism or real social research.
/r/MensRights31/08/18 01:23 PM
61

It's pity that this is linked to metoo which has pretty much turned into typical feminist bullshit and spreading hate.
/r/MensRights31/08/18 01:14 PM
4

If you know this, the rest of Wikipedia is useful. And even many political articles are often good at telling all sides. Just stay away from articles that are important for feminist and other SJWs and where political correctness is more important than facts.
/r/MensRights31/08/18 07:04 AM
6

And this coming from people who believe in such fringe conspiracy theories like patriarchy and hegemonic masculinity, people who lie about pretty much everything just to make the world fit their crazy ideology.
/r/MensRights31/08/18 06:35 AM
1

I'm neither. Relying on isms is probably the stupidest thing you can do. But, that said, I don't understand your point. "Insulted"? What on earth are you talking about? You must have misunderstood something.
/r/MensRights30/08/18 12:54 PM
1

I happen to live in a country where all female-specific words for professions have, pretty much, disappeared. Or, to be more precise, you still can use female-specific terms but you don't have to. So, "actor" (näyttelijä) looks like this. Google's algorithm decided that perhaps about 10% of actors are women on the top results.
/r/MensRights30/08/18 07:38 AM
-10

I don't know if you were being sarcastic, but people are not trash. People are the most complex known system in the universe and perhaps the only intelligence there is. People are, must be regarded as, more valuable than anything else.
/r/MensRights30/08/18 06:49 AM
4

The support networks aren't the same in different countries, according to the OECD's Better Life index: http://www.oecdbetterlifeindex.org/#/11151111111 (Click first "gender differences" and then "by rank".) If the results are trustworthy (and I tend to believe that the OECD isn't corrupted by feminism or other ideologies, not much, anyways) women have much better networks in the USA while in the UK, for example, it's the other way around. PS. The better Life index is, as far as I know, the only…
/r/MensRights30/08/18 05:56 AM
3

Actually, women nowadays retire at 55 which gives them 16 years of pension on average. Men's retirement age is 60 and the life expectancy is 64. By the way, the Gender Gap Index by the WEF claims that the equality in health is perfect in Russia when measured by healthy years. Much better than in the Nordic countries, for example, LOL, I mean, what else can you do but laugh at feminism?
/r/MensRights29/08/18 05:59 PM
4

Well, there used to be outspoken feminists in Russia. I don't know if they exist anymore. But, yeah, this, making women equal in this respect, can't be high on their agenda. Probably it isn't on their agenda at all.
/r/MensRights29/08/18 03:24 PM
4

And this in a country where men on average die before they reach 65 but women live till 71. I should have written "gynocentrism in action" instead of the ironic "patriarchy in action", sorry.
/r/MensRights29/08/18 03:00 PM
3

Who raped whom? A statutory rape, perhaps, if it happened in California. If it happened in a place where a 17 year old can consent to sex (as it is in most of the civilized world), legally there was (probably) no rape. Anyways, nothing has been proven in the court of law.
/r/MensRights29/08/18 09:12 AM
2

The motive is to make money, and for the "yellow press," it's always been about being "scandalous" in a way that appeals to as many readers as possible. But this is not about eye-catching headlines, tho.
/r/MensRights29/08/18 09:01 AM
9

LOL
/r/MensRights29/08/18 08:55 AM
11

A nice approach. She thought that she could spread hate and be protected by the principle of academic freedom. But now, if I understood right, the whole man-hating department can fall under her? If so, if the department must return to the academia and civilizaton, so to speak, can she carry on as a professor there?
/r/MensRights28/08/18 04:13 PM
17

Yeah, when I was young and pretty there were, I don't know, something like ten times, when I was groped by girls of my age or somewhat older and twice by an older woman. Once I was approached by a man in a public place who asked if he could "do things to me". But he never touched me. :) It was never a big deal: "oh, I see, this is the way sex works, interesting". Well, come to think of it, when I was about twenty I almost hit a woman who groped me but then just pushed her away. The last time I g…
/r/MensRights28/08/18 03:55 PM
159

Men who are celebrities, entertainers, firefighters, waiters in bars and all those men, also regular men, who face all that shit don't have the luxury of deciding whether to arrest the harassers or just let it go. Women can always call the cops.
/r/MensRights28/08/18 03:39 PM
1

Pretty much so. But actually, you haven't won anything but lost time and consumed the energy that is you. Pick your fights, don't argue with feminists, if you appreciate yourself. :D But, then again, how to know who are the ones that won't change and who are those can change? All of a sudden you may encounter a feminist who totally surprises you.
/r/MensRights28/08/18 02:57 PM
5

People either ignore or fight all ideas that don't fit their worldview, narratives that are crucial to their identity. That's why "true" feminists, for example, never change their minds even when faced with undeniable facts. Rather they start to shame you or use any strategy that makes it possible to restore the cognitive equilibrium, make the dissonance go away. But if you are aware of this tendency or bias, you can do better than most of the humanity when faced with facts that don't fit nicely…
/r/MensRights28/08/18 02:43 PM
1

Finding the feminine side in himself.
/r/MensRights28/08/18 02:12 PM
3

Sorry but it seems to be one of those things that don't get studied - because it affects only men which makes it pretty much a non-issue - but sometimes I've seen it getting mentioned in interviews. When my sons moved away and struggled with this problem I asked about it and it seems to be common knowledge among the professionals. "If there are women who want the same apartment it's very unlikely that a man gets it." I've googled it haphazardly a couple of times in English and didn't find anythi…
/r/MensRights27/08/18 05:32 PM
9

In most countries, as far as I know, a legal abortion must take place before the sex is known. Sweden is an exception and probably a few other countries. It would be interesting to know how many more male fetuses get aborted there by "modern Swedish women". Women, after all, almost always adopt girls if they get to choose. Then again, immigrants from traditional cultures might abort more girls, though this is probably just a prejudice.
/r/MensRights27/08/18 09:26 AM
3

Regarding the flair: a huge majority of the Russians think they are part of the western culture and Europe and definitely not the eastern culture. Tolstoy, Tchaikovsky etc. are part of the western canon, not eastern. Not that I'd have anything against what is called the East (in the west), just to set the record straight.
/r/MensRights27/08/18 05:52 AM
14

The room is white people only. Racist: YES/NO? Men are, actually, pushed toward poorer areas because they are discriminated against in the rental markets. This is leading to a widening gender gap but almost nobody cares. I wonder why. /s
/r/MensRights27/08/18 05:44 AM
6

Women earn less but spend more. I'm pretty sure it's the same with girls and boys (unless it's a study made by feminist-minded people in which case girls getting less isn't probably even true).
/r/MensRights27/08/18 05:33 AM
25

The feminist Guardian publishing something like "women aren't always completely superior beings compared to men" is remarkable, tho.
/r/MensRights27/08/18 05:25 AM
4

Here's their latest "masterwork" that will undoubtedly sell well. They have managed to have just one middle-aged man and even he, as a Jew, doesn't belong to the despised "white race" (according to the stupid people who are counting). Then there is a woman and an African man (according to Wikipedia he's Nigerian). Identity politics is winning, forget the TV career if you're a white male scholar.
/r/MensRights26/08/18 07:47 AM
7

Perhaps so, but the actual figures tell otherwise. In lesbian relationships, there are more coercion and sexual abuse than in other kinds of relationships. Likewise, the "lesbian bed death" is, as the term tells, typically something that happens between women. Geer probably can't fit these facts into her cult worldview. So, she is in all likelihood attacking women without even knowing it.
/r/MensRights26/08/18 06:02 AM
8

“My point here was to say that it makes sense for women to have rage, legitimate rage, against a group of people that has systematically abused them,” In other words, she's a woman after all: “My point here was to say that it makes sense for me to have rage, legitimate rage, against a group of people that has systematically abused me,” If that's true, she should be able to show several court cases against those men who have systematically abused her. But if she's a normal well-to-do American wom…
/r/MensRights25/08/18 12:17 PM
1

I don't think they have protected classes in Belgium. The whole thing is (probably) based on the law and constitution saying that people can't be discriminated because of their sex and other such things. This is all good till you start to interfere with small businesses which are often just trying to survive by making decisions they think their customers will prefer. (It's true, tho, that these "equality laws" often benefit women much more than men - and sometimes they can even be written so tha…
/r/MensRights25/08/18 06:59 AM
2

In my opinion, this is not right. If a microenterprise wants to employ a certain kind of a person, like a tall handsome man to sell sports equipment, nobody should be able to tell it that they must hire an ugly short person. The same goes for the sexes: if you want to hire a woman to sell female clothes and underwear the state has no right to penalize you for not hiring a man. The idea from the company's perspective is to survive, not implement a political ideology forced upon it by the state. T…
/r/MensRights25/08/18 06:46 AM
3

Many of them probably think it in terms of women's sexual empowerment. And all negativity as the patriarchy's way to repress their sexuality. If a boy is willing to have consensual sex, who has any right to forbid women from expressing their sexuality - with somebody who doesn't yet belong to the oppressing class, men. (As a side note, 17 is above the age of consent in Europe and most of the USA,)
/r/MensRights24/08/18 06:53 AM
6

My theory is that because women so seldom face discrimination they don't usually have the need or urge to study sexism. The just say that they are feminists because it's considered something good and because they know that it gives them benefits.
/r/MensRights23/08/18 02:27 PM
6

Did he just commit a career suicide?
/r/MensRights23/08/18 02:23 PM
7

You can't emigrate just like that to the EU or any other place outside the US jurisdiction (unless you have a lot of money in which case there are places like Switzerland, Bermuda, the Canal Islands, Monaco and even shadier places in Africa, Asia, and South America.). If you want to move to Finland (something I know about and is similar to the other Nordic countries you mentioned) you either have to have to get married here or you must have a job in a field where there aren't unemployed local ci…
/r/MensRights23/08/18 04:49 AM
141

Women rape men and boys, too.
/r/MensRights23/08/18 04:21 AM
1

Wasn't it in the news that women stalk men more than vice versa? I'm pretty sure that's the case. But, then again, men don't usually get worried because, well that's the way men often are.
/r/MensRights22/08/18 02:20 PM
2

Women on dates measure men's intelligence on man's ability to make them laugh. That's a pretty good measure of intelligence or, at least, wits and sharpness. When women are asked about intelligence, this is probably not what they are thinking but some kind of nerdiness. perhaps, or "boring mansplaining".
/r/MensRights22/08/18 07:43 AM
2

It would be interesting if somebody, somehow could find out how many men have been killed by people who have been inspired by feminism.
/r/MensRights22/08/18 07:21 AM
2

It's the part of the UN, the UN women, whose task is to advocate for women and the women's issues. Naturally, they don't have a similar section for men. If they had, there could be a tweet about the killed male reporters.
/r/MensRights22/08/18 06:16 AM
-1

You are wrong.
/r/MensRights21/08/18 04:01 AM
8

Movember tells that, although most "gendered" charity money goes to women, it is possible to raise money for men. It's a strange "outlier", but is it possible that it won't be an outlier anymore after a few decades? The empathy gap is real but is it unbridgeable?
/r/MensRights20/08/18 06:52 AM
-6

In which Arab country you live in?
/r/MensRights20/08/18 06:27 AM
0

The averages? The graph tells that the majority (or close to it) of women are on a higher curve. The average woman is also much higher than the average man (the highest point of the curve). The graph is not absolute because if it was the majority of women would be much more intelligent than men. And I don't buy it. And now the downvotes ...
/r/MensRights19/08/18 08:23 PM
1

So, and I don't want to be a nuisance :D, the graph is misleading in the sense that it could be interpreted telling about the absolute IQs when it's actually about relative IQs? If I don't understand the answer I promise not to drink any more beer.
/r/MensRights19/08/18 07:28 PM
1

If we ignored, say 49% of the people on both sides of the curve and just studied the remaining majority, would the curve show that men and women are equally intelligent?
/r/MensRights19/08/18 06:59 PM
-2

So, is the graph misleading?
/r/MensRights19/08/18 06:56 PM
-4

Yes, but I think the idea was to ignore the outliers and just look at the majority of people close to the top of the curve. Perhaps I'm getting old and my IQ doesn't work the way it used to but ... nevertheless, isn't the average woman more intelligent than the average man if the "outliers" are ignored? (which doesn't sound right.)
/r/MensRights19/08/18 06:32 PM
3

Virtues are gendered. Women and men gravitate towards different virtues. If that wasn't the case Titanic would have ended differently. :D A couple of years ago I and my wife were spending our holiday in a hotel in Greece. All of a sudden there was smoke coming into the room, alarms were screeching. My wife, who is about the most independent woman I know, looked at me and asked something like: what are you going to do? I was kind of surprised, she clearly wanted me to help her out of the situatio…
/r/MensRights19/08/18 06:09 PM
-4

What? According to the graph, the average woman is clearly more intelligent than the average man.
/r/MensRights19/08/18 05:23 PM
1

Lol. But as Baumeister (I think) said: to be successful you need intelligence and willpower. Willpower is something you can learn, intelligence not so much. (if you have the right kind of parents you need neither intelligence nor willpower, of course.)
/r/MensRights19/08/18 05:18 PM
2

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bayesian_statistics Things that are likely are going to happen more likely than things that are not so likely.
/r/MensRights19/08/18 05:11 PM
2

What comes naturally to women isn't what comes naturally to men and vice versa. I wouldn't expect an average woman to stand up against an average young - violent - man. It's like making female and male athletes compete together. But I have lots of wonderful experiences of female nurses and doctors, for example. They helped the victims here, too, as paramedics and ER doctors.
/r/MensRights19/08/18 04:35 PM
2

As I already said, I'm not trying to form a worldview. It's just an observation: aggressive men, dozens of them, took action for what is good, against a single madman, to help an elderly woman, a mother with a baby and others. Because the name of this sub is "MensRights" I think it's OK to bring up this "strange idea" that ... well, one of the strongest moral ideas men live by - or used to live by - is to protect the weak. Should men do it? Probably not. Hell, take care of yourself! Don't bother…
/r/MensRights19/08/18 03:48 PM
2

When I said that the men who fought were good it doesn't mean that women were bad. Most men didn't fight either. Yes, it's an individual thing - that strongly correlates with masculinity. Again, the confirmation bias has nothing to do with the fact that men fought and women didn't. Socialization is another issue altogether. What we are is a mix of our biological traits and the environment, of course. This is not a worldview but something that people should remember when they script their narrati…
/r/MensRights19/08/18 07:40 AM
1

It seems to be a male "ape" instinct. If it was a female instinct there would have been women risking their lives to save others. In a situation like that, you don't rationalize, your feelings direct you. Feel free to disagree, but it's a fact that women don't react the same way as men do in a situation like that. Fight, flight or freeze. Men are inclined to fight more than women, much more. There were several demonstrations yesterday ("anti-nazis", anarchists, nationalists). I had time to conte…
/r/MensRights19/08/18 07:12 AM
65

Stephen King could write a short story about her after the next time she snaps, that's an option, too.
/r/MensRights19/08/18 06:37 AM
19

I wonder if there is a special course in the law school named something like "How to defend a woman by claiming she had been abused and not minding about the actual facts". By the way, I seem to remember that there was a study suggesting that female judges aren't as easily led when it comes to these "I was abused" defenses.
/r/MensRights19/08/18 06:32 AM
1

You kinda implied that I had racist motives up there. But, hey, who cares. Not I. :)
/r/MensRights18/08/18 08:27 PM
1

It's not irrelevant that the asshole attacked the weak. His first victim was an elderly woman and then he stabbed a man, Hassan Zubieria, who came to help. The same pattern got repeated, when he stabbed a woman with a baby in a trolley and then a man who came to help. After that he stabbed just women. Hassan Zubiere will probably spend the rest of his life in a wheelchair. Reminding about this is all good .. but it's not your initial criticism ... that I still don't understand.
/r/MensRights18/08/18 08:10 PM
1

If you define the rights of men as legal issues, as something to do with the relationship between the state and the individual, then, no. But that would be silly, no?
/r/MensRights18/08/18 07:49 PM
2

Read the Wikipedia article. I honestly don't understand what's your problem. It's true, though, that the asshole did put a man into a wheelchair for the rest of his life and I could have probably mentioned that within the 300 letters that Reddit allows for titles.
/r/MensRights18/08/18 07:21 PM
5

Aggressiveness is often seen as a liability, something men are guilty of. This is a feminist theme. But here, once again, what saved us from an even bigger catastrophe was, what I called, male virtues: help the weaker without caring much for one's own security. This is a counter-narrative, so to speak. Men, boys, need a counter-narrative. I was a couple of blocks away when this all happened and ... I'm pretty sure that I couldn't have been the kind of hero these men were. As I wrote, many of the…
/r/MensRights18/08/18 07:05 PM
4

So, in your opinion, men who defended the weaker ones and made the jihadist asshole flee were toxic? One of them got maimed for life. Toxic? Probably you forgot the sarcasm-tag?
/r/MensRights18/08/18 06:25 PM
1

"We"? Me "racist"?! What on earth are you talking about!? I don't think your allegations deserve an answer.
/r/MensRights18/08/18 05:03 PM
4

Probably she "she had sex" with him.
/r/MensRights18/08/18 04:29 PM
10

It's a teenage hypergamy thing. All those bitter feelings when the alpha guy didn't marry you but just had sex with you and then moved on.
/r/MensRights18/08/18 04:14 PM
0

Lol, yes, I hate when women ... no, #metoo is a typical women first thing. It's "always" about women.
/r/MensRights18/08/18 03:54 PM
3

It makes people come out about being raped You mean women?
/r/MensRights18/08/18 07:09 AM
3

It's one side of feminity that can be called toxic. Most women are decent people, the same way as most men are.
/r/MensRights18/08/18 07:06 AM
3

Gender justice specialist Natalie Collins thinks that many younger women have been misled. "I think young women have been told a lie that they can have equal power in sexual interactions with men. The reality is they don't." Indeed, women have hugely more power than men ... but that's a fact a feminist can never understand.
/r/MensRights18/08/18 06:07 AM
1

My point was that if the tests - still - correlate strongly with problem-solving and - in the end - success in life, who am I to say that they don't measure intelligence? But, yeah, it does raise suspicions. Perhaps they sacrificed the ability to predict ("truth") with politics, the equality of outcome if you like. And, yeah, it is possible that tests started to measure more the will-power instead of "true intelligence". But I was interested in these things years ago, so, I don't know where the …
/r/MensRights16/08/18 09:12 PM
6

The IQ tests have been modified so that the sexes would get about the same results. The older tests that concentrated on the logical connections between forms gave men better results. So "they" increased the number of tasks that had to do with language. Intelligence is something that correlates strongly with problem-solving and - in the end - success in life, nothing more, nothing less. But so does the will-power, for example.
/r/MensRights16/08/18 08:47 PM
1

Tiga means stay silent, I have no idea why Google translate doesn't know the word and its derivatives.
/r/MensRights16/08/18 05:15 PM
1

Whos' advocating anything, duh.
/r/MensRights16/08/18 03:01 PM
5

Another risk is that you get accused of mansplaining. So, you should avoid both informal and factual discussions and encounters.
/r/MensRights16/08/18 09:01 AM
-1

In the end, workplaces must have safe places were all interaction must happen.
/r/MensRights16/08/18 08:58 AM
4

Plus toxic feminity which is responsible for the fact boys are discriminated against in schools by female teachers (according to several studies). Toxic feminity makes women hate and despise even boys, not just men.
/r/MensRights16/08/18 08:09 AM
2

She doesn't necessarily try to act stupid. It's very much possible that she just don't think that The Rules apply to her because she's a) a woman and b) a good feminist person. Perhaps she's feels so entitled and cofused that she is incapable of reflecting her own actions the same way she sees the actions of men. And she's actually right. The sanctions she faces are much more leninet than anything a man in a similar situation would face.
/r/MensRights16/08/18 06:29 AM
1

Ms Ronell, who is a lesbian, Is she a feminist lesbian: tries hard to be because it signals all the right things, contempt for men and masculinity and solidarity toward women? But deep inside there's a little voice telling something else. And the cognitive dissonance drives her toward inappropriate thoughts and finally actions.
/r/MensRights16/08/18 06:22 AM
1

Hypergamy (or to be more precise: the urge to lust for the alpha males) is perhaps the biggest reason for the hatred. During the formative teenage years, girls want the same few boys and they are either taken or, what's even much worse, "using" (very willing) girls for sexual purposes, betraying each and everyone on the way. Most of the "decent guys" are off the girls' radar, at least in the sexual sense. The author has an unrealistic view of men, women and the relationships between them, not on…
/r/MensRights15/08/18 03:45 PM
22

There have been many trends during the past decades that have been widening the gender gap, not closing it. The education gap is the most alarming example but there are others. Feminism has truly been victorious.
/r/MensRights15/08/18 03:03 PM
4

Why does Australia hate men? I mean, the kind of articles you see here - and there seems to be a lot of them - are just misandrist bullshit without journalistic standards. And it's not just media but the state, courts, schools etc. Though the world isn't a friendly place for men nowadays, Australia seems like an outlier in this respect.
/r/MensRights15/08/18 08:07 AM
3

My guess is that academic men sexually harassing women tend to get revealed much more often than the other way around. And for that reason alone, I wouldn't be surprised if female teachers harassed students more than male teachers. Of course, the writer of that piece doesn't even recognize the possibility of such a thing happening.
/r/MensRights15/08/18 07:56 AM
5

The 2017 study said larger companies did a better job of appointing women, with all 50 of the highest-revenue companies having at least one female director and 23 percent of board seats held by women. What a surprise! Of course big firms can afford it. Hell, they can afford to have bigger boards so that a few not-so-qualified board members don't matter much. I used to consult a big retail company many years ago. The board decided that it would look good if they had a board member who represented…
/r/MensRights15/08/18 07:08 AM
1

Ah, Feminist Bias Masquerades as if it was / if they were Opposing Bias
/r/MensRights14/08/18 06:30 AM
47

Professor Davis wrote in an email. “But it’s for that very reason that it’s so disappointing when this incredible energy for justice is twisted and turned against itself, which is what many of us believe is happening in this case.” Check your privilege. The rules do apply to women and feminists, too. At least sometimes.
/r/MensRights14/08/18 06:26 AM
-1

To be frank, she, as a woman, could have answered the last question: I told you already. (I'm not saying it's a good answer but, within the context she set, the guy's comeback is stupid. It's not a very good meme.)
/r/MensRights14/08/18 05:49 AM
4

Feminist Bias Masquerades as Opposing Bias Baumeister is my hero but this time the point escapes me. What does that mean?
/r/MensRights13/08/18 05:10 PM
4

Stepping into a bathroom is a risk and I do that every day many times. But then again, I'm a pretty brave dude.
/r/MensRights13/08/18 04:20 PM
1

Reactionaries are nowadays those who have had power for ages and whose opinions have been mainstream determining the political agenda for decades, like Social Democrats and Feminists, no? If you're talking about the right-wing populists, they have been successful in the USA, the Netherlands, Italy and in a couple of Central- European countries (Poland, Hungary, Austria). And isn't the UK ruled by populists, too?
/r/MensRights13/08/18 02:39 PM
1

Another Feminist joke: How many men does it take to change a lightbulb? None, because we killed them all.
/r/MensRights13/08/18 08:32 AM
1

When I was in the army we spend a week in forests, sleeping in tents, crawling in the snow, and the temperature never went above -20. At worst it was under -30. But this happened in another country which can perhaps have even worse winters.
/r/MensRights13/08/18 08:23 AM
1

If it's purely a personal choice then no. Naturally.
/r/MensRights11/08/18 05:08 PM
-5

If something is a norm you either follow it or take the risk of becoming an outcast or worse. Think about the norm of putting clothes on in public places, either you follow the norm or end up in jail. Of course, the sanction of not putting a different dress every day isn't jail, but in certain circles, there could be - and surely are, too - some sort of sanctions.
/r/MensRights11/08/18 04:49 PM
9

If women have to do that and men don't, then it really is a privilege of sorts. But do women really have to wear different dresses or is it just certain women in certain circles, like snobs in posh circumstances?
/r/MensRights11/08/18 03:08 PM
1

Yeah, but I didn't talk about negative feelings but problems, meaning psychological problems.
/r/MensRights11/08/18 02:56 PM
13

Women's work isn't systematically devalued. Actually, there are studies indicating that on average employers value women's work more than men's work nowadays.
/r/MensRights11/08/18 02:17 PM
3

Women tend to internalize their problems while men act outwards in problematic, often anti-social ways. Well, that's one theory.
/r/MensRights11/08/18 01:08 PM
0

The term "I" doesn't really mean anything either.
/r/MensRights11/08/18 12:54 PM
2

"He's our best male man hater. Why would we let some vague and perhaps unfounded allegations destroy him?" Feminists
/r/MensRights11/08/18 10:39 AM
-1

The NYT is mostly pretty solid journalism, but they do give some room to Feminism, that's true. And it does undercut the whole enterprise.
/r/MensRights11/08/18 08:53 AM
1

I'm talking about persons who repeat time and again violent crimes and who can carry on for decades. They, or that one percent, must be mostly psychopaths in all likelihood. Then again it's true that if we take a shorter time span the share of other kinds of recidivists increases.
/r/MensRights10/08/18 07:07 PM
4

LOL, I can just imagine how a young, extremely confused feminist explains how the world works to a highly experienced academic.
/r/MensRights10/08/18 02:54 PM
3

Most of them are psychopaths and you can deal with them only one way: put them behind the bars. So far there is no way of curing them (some of them will get better when they get old, tho). Of course you can also kill them. That way they were treated through the millennia. Come to think of it, we could also somehow tell the public who are dangerous psychopaths. Then people wouldn't, for example, date them.
/r/MensRights10/08/18 02:49 PM
25

And freedom of choice: "studying/working isn't so great after all, I'll become a housewife".
/r/MensRights10/08/18 02:36 PM
1

Did you get this from Der Untergang des Abendlandes or where?
/r/MensRights10/08/18 09:17 AM
14

In many countries the majority of doctors are female and even in more countries, the majority of young doctors are female.
/r/MensRights10/08/18 06:39 AM
2

Ezra Klein, at least, seems to live in a different, strange universe than Sam Harris.
/r/MensRights10/08/18 05:25 AM
1

According to the WEF's Gender Gap Report, Russia's equality in health is better than that of Sweden because men have far fewer healthy years ins Russia.
/r/MensRights09/08/18 08:15 PM
22

In the UK it's rape only if the victim is penetrated with a penis. So, the paper can't for legal reasons call it a rape. But why call it a seduction? Isn't there better words like "used him"? Or if that' too risky, why not "had sex"? Seduced means, doesn't it, that boy played somehow along. And that sounds derogatory.
/r/MensRights09/08/18 03:34 PM
3

Well, there must be some reason for the fast incline in just about seven years (2008-15). Very hard to come up with something that could have happened in just a few years. And, furthermore, most of the increase happened actually 2013-15, in three years in other words. Could it be a change in the way deaths get reported when patients, who have prostate cancer, die?
/r/MensRights09/08/18 02:21 PM
10

although men fare better than women in most conventional measures such as top jobs and earnings But not in such unconventional as education, marginalization, homelessness, social networks, substance abuse, job injuries and deaths, life expectancy, suicides, and even happiness. I wonder why these indicators aren't conventional, Because they'd show that men are clearly worse-off by almost all meaningful measures?
/r/MensRights09/08/18 10:30 AM
4

As Feminists, they must think that boys and men can't face "gendered problems". And that's a huge problem because it means that the EU can't tackle the huge gendered problems, like education, as a "male problem". Instead, they must think it as a general equality problem (if they thought it at all) which is inefficient because the problem is partly gendered: boys do worse because they are boys and because they are treated as boys- and even because the gynocentric systems discriminate against them…
/r/MensRights09/08/18 10:18 AM
2

so this is the EU equivalent of the VAWA. The Council of Europe, not the EU, they are two totally different organizations.
/r/MensRights09/08/18 08:03 AM
2

so this is the EU equivalent of the VAWA. The Council of Europe, not the EU, they are two totally different organizations.
/r/MensRights09/08/18 08:02 AM
2

If you think that "fair" means that less white men are hired then that's the only possibility. I wonder how well the "AI community" understands that they have an unsolvable dilemma in their hands. The practical solution is to let the employer tweak the parameters so that everything can go on like before, just with a little help from the AI. You'll let the AI choose the "objectively" best candidate and then you'll tweak till you're satisfied.
/r/MensRights09/08/18 07:52 AM
5

Not all algorithms are created equal—and there’s disagreement among the AI community about which algorithms have the potential to make the hiring process more fair. It's going to those who favor minorities and women, never mind their qualifications..
/r/MensRights09/08/18 07:26 AM
3

It's often claimed that men are more likely to start working before they graduate. I don't know if that's true but it seems likely. For men, the college has a lot more instrumental value, it's something you have to do to get to the next step. And if you can get to the next step without graduating, men are more eager to grab that possibility. Of course, that's true for many women but the drive, on average, isn't that strong.
/r/MensRights09/08/18 07:13 AM
4

I wonder how many times more money girls spend than boys. And if the chore gap - if true - is the result of discussion like this: "Ok honey, you'll get the shirt but only if you do the dishes".
/r/MensRights09/08/18 06:32 AM
6

Plan is a Feminist organization but more than that is a - cynical -organization that utilizes the fact that people want to help girls more than anybody else. Its overheads are typically much higher than in other similar organizations (because, and this is speculation, it's so cynical an organization that they don't feel it's wrong to pay more to their - high-ranking - workers perhaps?). I never give money to Plan. It's a feminist organization, for heaven's sake! And when they demonize the third-…
/r/MensRights08/08/18 08:00 PM
45

That's what they say. It does sound like typical Feminist cherry picking (mentioning only facts that support their ideology). Furthermore, the facts might be right but all Feminist-sounding facts should be strongly doubted. But who would be against helping women and children!? Only misogynist pigs, I suppose. So this will carry on without any investigations.
/r/MensRights08/08/18 07:51 AM
5

Feminists aren't dealing with their own but possible enemies (as they see and teach it). That's a big difference you didn't get.
/r/MensRights08/08/18 07:39 AM
2

My thought exactly.
/r/MensRights07/08/18 05:32 PM
1

Look at the types of men and women who work in the media/Hollywood, the women are almost entirely thin and beautiful, where there is a much larger spectrum of short, ugly men who are successful. If young starlets don't want to be valued for their looks they can get a job at burger king. (also, there are people with real problems in the world). By the way, are we sure that the number of beautiful starlets is any bigger than the number of handsome stars when we take into account that people think …
/r/MensRights07/08/18 03:02 PM
4

Typical feminist cherry picking and concentrating on women's issues. Which is understandable. You can't write a convincing article on this patriarchy thing if you also told how the women are considered more wonderful (look it up), how they are treated more emphatically, how they get better grades than boys even by male teachers, how some universities are turning mostly female, how there are about 100 charities for women and girls to one for boys and men, how employers favor women in hiring, how …
/r/MensRights07/08/18 10:57 AM
3

Your understanding of the society is very weird. Luckily it's also a very fringe understanding outside some feminist circles. Think what the world would turn into if all people or even the majority started to think the patriarchy is real and explains what happens to men and women instead of talking about the real people and real problems.
/r/MensRights07/08/18 10:38 AM
1

Expected, rather.
/r/MensRights06/08/18 07:47 PM
9

Here are possible reasons for the idea that women, in particular, get harassed online: The culture of girls tends to be pretty toxic at times and women grow up to be oversensitive Women have this feeling of entitlement, that they should be treated like something precious Journalists are nowadays often women with feminists ideas and they do get aggressive feedback when they spread feminist lies and hate speech - and surely in other occasions as well. Feminist cultural undercurrents teach people a…
/r/MensRights06/08/18 02:56 PM
8

Woman are treated better in general, why would it be different online?
/r/MensRights06/08/18 10:08 AM
5

The number of accusations that don't lead to anything is somewhere around that percentage. That's what the police in Helsinki told on their Facebook page-
/r/MensRights05/08/18 03:57 PM
1

Yep, that's the way it's done in most of the civilized world.
/r/MensRights04/08/18 09:16 PM
3

can the SPLC turned to something good or is it lost, a feminist cause? An honest question.
/r/MensRights04/08/18 07:56 PM
2

At least since she's a lesbian, hopefully that means she won't also end up having a child I just happened to see a "Pride Crowd" in a park party after the parade and there were a lot of femaöe couples, lesbian women presumably with children. If lesbianism is innate, there are going to be a lot more lesbians soon. Male homosexuality can't be inherited the same way. Does it matter? Intuitively? Yes, it does. Scientifically? I can't find a source that approves or disapproves. Of course, men are imp…
/r/MensRights04/08/18 07:03 PM
-8

True, but I still liked what he said. Crucify me! ;)
/r/MensRights04/08/18 02:17 PM
1

Yeah, the title is correct. My two cents is that ... if my daughter was in her position ... I would say ... yeah, don't let her enter leadership positions but don't crucify her either. On a political level, I would have to say: crucify her
/r/MensRights04/08/18 01:07 PM
-15

True, but I still liked what he said.
/r/MensRights04/08/18 12:30 PM
-16

I talked about the violence men face with my son and the fact that men face much more violence and still it's not on the political agenda like the violence women face. My son had a pretty great comeback: of course, men face more violence on average because some of them act like violent assholes.
/r/MensRights04/08/18 10:20 AM
1

Immanuel Kant was a pretty special man and he was a nerd, worth beating up, perhaps, by the guys who admire the old "warrior masculinity". Not that I'd hate the warrior masculinity in itself. It's a fine, although sometimes a troubling part of what certain man can be - if they can't be Immanuel Kants. :D
/r/MensRights04/08/18 10:12 AM
3

They are afraid. Most of them have similar histories, hating white men, particularly. Gosh, what if hating men would become a barrier to your career! We can't let that happen! But, but, but ... I do agree that the adolescent statements of pretty much everybody can be embarrassing. Not like kill all Jews and men kind of embarrassing but nevertheless. I'm not saying that this monster should get off the hook - but I think that people have the right to develop and regret what they said as teenagers.…
/r/MensRights04/08/18 09:57 AM
7

It's disturbing how so many journalists don't seem to have any professional pride anymore. Just write what seems politically correct.
/r/MensRights04/08/18 08:25 AM
9

There is this short story I liked when I was in my early teens. It was about a man hiding under the bed yelling out obscenities because he couldn't face the outside world.
/r/MensRights04/08/18 08:21 AM
13

Can you read?
/r/MensRights04/08/18 07:52 AM
30

The NYT sends me FB ads so that I could subscribe to the paper. Come on! why would I pay for something that wants me killed or, at least, thinks that they can hire a person who wants me killed?
/r/MensRights04/08/18 07:43 AM
6

A young woman who has been fed feminist and racist lies all her life. What else to expect?
/r/MensRights03/08/18 07:57 PM
1

I'm not sure if we disagree on anything essential. I happen to live in a country that has been "elected" a couple of times the best country in the world - and it's pretty socialist here. "Socialism" meaning high taxes and a lot of security - and happiness according to surveys. I'm not saying that I'm living in the best country in the world, far from it actually. Actually, it's often more shitty here than in places like London or Berlin . But here "hate speech" is prohibited by the law. People wh…
/r/MensRights03/08/18 05:20 PM
1

You seem to be a libertarian. I can't be one because, among other things, I know that talking is sometimes doing. Or because I know that we should share the world, not own it. But I do respect your worldview and consider it important (if you are, indeed libertarian or something like that). The idea that the libertarians would have the power is repulsive though. If we were close to that happening, I would speak up.
/r/MensRights03/08/18 04:46 PM
1

Hate is like a disease. Clearly, you understand this. Most people think that diseases are something you have the right to fight against. No? If the guys across the street is, I don't know, like Hitler whom everybody who didn't know him liked ... ok, just like him, let him talk whatever he has on his chest. No, your duty is to speak up.
/r/MensRights03/08/18 02:41 PM
1

The very idea of free speech is to give everyone the right to speak up. If your neihgbor is an asshole, it's your duty to speak up.
/r/MensRights03/08/18 02:12 PM
13

My wife is a great person. My sister isn't all that great and it has something to do with narcissism I think. When I think about all the people, or try to think all the people I've met, hmm perhaps there is some truth to what you wrote. Women often feel that they are more entitled to privileges - what they, of course, are in our culture.
/r/MensRights03/08/18 12:41 PM
40

Pat Ulatowsky in the comments section: I don't think the picture of Sunira Chaudhri looks like she is wearing appropriate office wear. Looks like a nightgown. Kinda like a guy wearing a speedo to work. The article: But many women questioned why conversations about drawing a line suddenly need to be had and why boundaries aren't already clear to some. Indeed, the boundaries aren't clear. My brother's wife (sorry to say) is a feminist and thinks that the "Slut Walk" movement is great. I once said …
/r/MensRights03/08/18 11:00 AM
4

She is a Feminist? Lying is not s surprise but something you expect a Feminist does.
/r/MensRights03/08/18 09:37 AM
2

Ok, I knew that, i'm becoming more and more word blind over the years particularly wheb writing in foreign languages. But Google guesses "too right" sometimes. Or should I write: "too rightly". :D
/r/MensRights03/08/18 09:33 AM
2

Tackling discrimination at work You have a right to equal opportunities! Fair treatment is a basic right in the European Union. It is illegal to discriminate because of a person's sex, age, disability, ethnic or racial origin, religion, belief or sexual orientation. Austria belongs to the EU. The EU gender policies are often crazy feminism but, fortunately, they aren't taken all that seriously by most member countries - and fortunately, they sometimes benefit men which surely isn't something the…
/r/MensRights03/08/18 07:40 AM
5

She surely belongs to a very successful demographic. But it won't save her from her own insanity. I wish.
/r/MensRights03/08/18 07:24 AM
14

The interesting thing is will the NYT fire her or not. Is it acceptable to be THIS racist and sexist if it's men who are hated? Can we let the racists and sexists carry on or will somebody in charge say: let's draw the line here, no further with this insanity?
/r/MensRights03/08/18 07:20 AM
7

She carried on with the "joke" (old white men are disgusting) for several months. You aren't even a joke.
/r/MensRights03/08/18 07:02 AM
8

Verge staffer Elizabeth Lopatto congratulated Jeong on the new gig but added, “Just a shame for all of us her twitter is about to be a lot less fun.” Jeong’s account replied with the emoji of a face wearing a medical mask over its mouth. This is the culture she believed in: the old white men are free game. Then it turned out that it wasn't that simple. Then she reverted to another meme she has been taught all her life: women get harrassed everywhere and in the social media in particular. This is…
/r/MensRights03/08/18 06:57 AM
1

And frankly, I don't care what that asshole across the street wants to do to me, as long as he doesn't do it. It seems to me that you don't understand the idea of free speech. But that is beside the point, really. Standing up for a racist, sexist, and ageist person is something that's very hard to understand. Sure, NYT will probably keep paying her but that should not be the standard for a civil person.
/r/MensRights03/08/18 06:28 AM
1

What am I missing here?
/r/MensRights03/08/18 05:21 AM
3

Probably not. They get protected and that's why they don't. get killed. But that wasn't my argument. Protecting the weak. like children, is the ultimate mark of any civilization. I wouldn't want to live in a society that didn't protect the weak.
/r/MensRights02/08/18 07:36 PM
3

Hating old white men is superb, that's what she's saying. Period. I mean, if she has any other point, why say this repulsive thing in the first place?
/r/MensRights02/08/18 07:24 PM
2

Yeah, it's sad that thin immoral way of thinking is what the majority believes in. And it's not going away. Even schoolboys are expandable! Where do these people come from?
/r/MensRights02/08/18 07:11 PM
1

I told this to the biggest newspaper in Finland and he, the journalist writing about the "silence" responded by writing a column about the plight of girls. I do get that women are the weaker sex and should be protected more in some places. Like, if women get killed 20 percent more in some shithole, they deserve 20 percent more protection. Right?
/r/MensRights02/08/18 06:53 PM
9

It is in themainstream media - and guess what: it's no big deal, business as usual.
/r/MensRights02/08/18 05:51 PM
29

“We hired Sarah Jeong because of the exceptional work she has done … her journalism and the fact that she is a young Asian woman have made her a subject of frequent online harassment. For a period of time she responded to that harassment by imitating the rhetoric of her harassers,” The Times said in a statement. “She regrets it, and The Times does not condone it.” And now prove it. Or is this one of those Feminist facts?
/r/MensRights02/08/18 05:49 PM
12

Racist, sexist, and ageist. A feminist who has been told by the elite all her life that hate is empowering, enjoyable. I hate her - but I don't hate young Asian women. Just her.
/r/MensRights02/08/18 05:41 PM
5

"remind men that it is okay to be masculine." This about the only reason they give in an otherwise very vague statement. But, yeah, masculinity is their enemy .. or is this a fake FB page. I mean, who in their right minds, would think that masculinituý is a bad thing? Hell, masculinity created the society we are enjoying in the first world countries. I think it's fake.
/r/MensRights01/08/18 11:16 AM
2

Then again he might have a personal history that explains his idiocy.
/r/MensRights01/08/18 10:51 AM
1

Because the OP is clearly a feminist.
/r/MensRights01/08/18 10:38 AM
2

Is this sub taken over by feminists?
/r/MensRights31/07/18 05:01 PM
2

This is how feminism poisons the brains of the stupid people. And, guess what, stupid people are the majority.
/r/MensRights31/07/18 04:49 PM
2

That's what you want to think. No arguments, tho.
/r/MensRights31/07/18 04:19 PM
7

“The significant increases in applications from EU and international students demonstrate the continuing popularity of UK higher education.” Yeah, learning English at a university level is a huge benefit in the modern world. But the next year, after the Brexit, the door will probably be closed. But back to the MRA: female teachers favor girls. That pretty much explains the whole gap.
/r/MensRights31/07/18 03:51 PM
2

Feminism is a good thing. So is men’s rights movement; both groups want the exact same thing and you guys seem to be misunderstanding each other. Feminists don't want equality. They want to lie in order to get benefits for women. The wage gap, a lie to get more money for women. Just men are violent in relationships, a lie to get women more power in families, divorces and in courts of law. Rape culture, a lie to let women control men through fear and loathing. Mansplaining, a lie to control what …
/r/MensRights31/07/18 02:07 PM
2

https://www.ecosia.org/images?q=iranian+women+dress
/r/MensRights30/07/18 01:19 PM
1

Actually, she doesn't have to dress like that. Perhaps she wants to but why it's beyond me.
/r/MensRights30/07/18 12:48 PM
0

Apparently they don't teach Bayesian probability in Australian universities
/r/MensRights30/07/18 12:22 PM
3

Why would someone whose agenda is Nazism say anything positive about the Jews?
/r/MensRights29/07/18 05:30 AM
7

LOL, indeed.
/r/MensRights28/07/18 04:28 PM
1

Yeah, you are right, I'm stupid. :D
/r/MensRights27/07/18 03:23 PM
1

Bill Clinton said it and I think it's clever because so many people don't understand what he meant.
/r/MensRights27/07/18 02:51 PM
33

The person who drew the graph isn't intelligent, or perhaps she is a typical lying feminist. According to the graph, women aren't on the bell curve at all, in other words, there aren't very dumb or intelligent women at all. Furthermore, the graph claims that an average woman is a lot more clever than an average man which is false.
/r/MensRights27/07/18 02:05 PM
-3

Nope, it's economy. stupid (which means that competition determines prices, not "they").
/r/MensRights27/07/18 11:51 AM
3

The thing here is that women are allowed to despise boys and men without any consequences. It's not healthy because the attitude has a lot to do with the fact that "the society" ignores problems men tend to suffer of.
/r/MensRights25/07/18 07:00 AM
1

That's a myth, like most of what feminists think and say.
/r/MensRights25/07/18 06:55 AM
1

Teaching is definitely on the list of the jobs that should be and are "automated". Nursing and other health-related jobs, too.
/r/MensRights25/07/18 05:30 AM
4

The vast majority of people in Silicon Valley got there on their own, starting out with normal or low income, and ending up having earned every penny of their millions. It's a lot like a lottery, who earns billions and who millions and who go bankrupt. It is if you really think about it. Even the brilliant people need a lot of luck: genes, timing, ideas, people etc.
/r/MensRights23/07/18 07:17 PM
2

Viceral: relating to deep inward feelings rather than to the intellect.
/r/MensRights23/07/18 06:20 PM
2

It's a big problem: for every objective study, there must be perhaps 50 or 100 political/ideological/feminist studies. That reflects the money that is poured into feminist "research". So, googling for any "gender problem" will probably produce a lot of bullshit, and it's very hard to find the objective stuff among all that ideological rubbish.
/r/MensRights21/07/18 04:12 PM
2

But people have sympathy for young boys, not so much as for young girls but nevertheless. Why is nothing or very little happening with the equality gap between boys and girls? There must be more to the story.
/r/MensRights21/07/18 03:46 PM
2

My sister-in-law is an eager explainer. Sometimes sadness fills my heart when she explains things to her two sons, things that they know or should get the pleasure of understanding without their mother explaining. Sometimes she explains obvious things to me and I just smile and walk away. My brother has turned into a quiet man over the years. It's probably about showing off. Or, I don't know for sure. Explaining can have many functions.
/r/MensRights21/07/18 03:07 PM
3

Perhaps she's a libertarian and thinks it's indeed her body, her choice. Or perhaps she's a feminist and is out to destroy the civilization (which is based, after all, on understanding and following certain fundamental rules of conduct that help us avoid atavistic instincts).
/r/MensRights21/07/18 07:24 AM
7

The business logic is twofold: the owners think that more female customers will come shopping if they have wider parking spaces for women and if the parking spaces for women feel safer (close to the doors and better lit). Where I live this couldn't take place because women would feel insulted by the suggestion that they can't drive as well as men (and rightly so, although on average there is a slight difference). So, many shopping malls just made all the parking spaces wider when they realized t…
/r/MensRights21/07/18 07:08 AM
0

I've never been to your sr. Perhaps this comment three days ago in their sr got you banned: removed should be the men's version of #metoo.....because that's basicly how society views men's issues....out of sight out of mind.
/r/MensRights21/07/18 06:50 AM
2

Who gives a shit about some mentally ill idiots who need help to cope and not a platform to cry. People who aren't narcissistic psychopaths?
/r/MensRights21/07/18 06:42 AM
12

The author set the feminist tone in the very first paragraph: In the 1990s, the late Stanford neuroscientist Ben Barres transitioned from female to male. He was in his 40s, mid-career, and afterward he marveled at the stark changes in his professional life. Now that society saw him as male, his ideas were taken more seriously. He was able to complete a whole sentence without being interrupted by a man. A colleague who didn’t know he was transgender even praised his work as “much better than his …
/r/MensRights21/07/18 06:36 AM
1

It indeed looks a lot like a planned robbery gone wrong or even murder. If that was the case the jury didn't only let the murderer walk but dishonored the reputation of the victim. The justice system can only work if people believe it can deliver justice. If people start believing that the system favors certain perpetrators and don't care about certain victims, people will start setting up competing justice systems. And that's what's can happen here, if the victim had the "right" kind of friends…
/r/MensRights21/07/18 06:03 AM
3

So, it wasn't in the article? And, so, I didn't miss it?
/r/MensRights20/07/18 11:43 AM
3

Caused by the feminisation of the CPS. (bbc.co.uk) It seems that they blame poor overall practices and strained resources. but perhaps I missed the part where they talked about the feminisation?
/r/MensRights20/07/18 08:44 AM
2

Worlwide the biggest differences are in the area of the former Soviet Union and certain countries in South America. In China and Bangladesh it's women who kill themselves slightly more than men.
/r/MensRights20/07/18 07:06 AM
25

Empathy towards men is always surprising, particularly when a woman shows empathy. What's more, she offers a competing narrative to the narrative that the modern culture is feeding us. And that narrative is historically more accurate - though a myth, nevertheless. A huge demographic, like men, and the history of men and their relationship to women can't be reduced into a short sentence in a factually meaningful way.
/r/MensRights20/07/18 06:29 AM
1

The education gap is the biggest problem in any society that is supposed to be based on the ideal of equal opportunities.
/r/MensRights19/07/18 05:17 AM
4

They support a toxic ideology and they have been given the unchallenged power. It's pretty obvious what's going to happen.
/r/MensRights19/07/18 05:13 AM
2

About 80% of single men get rarely or never sex. And when they are demanded to play these unnatural language games it's going to become even more difficult. (Not that I would mind. It's good when the number of young men, who stop having the obsession with sex and women, increases. Sex is overrated. These laws teach men this and it's fine. See, I, too, believe people can be taught unnatural things, like giving up dreaming of sex.)
/r/MensRights19/07/18 04:59 AM
2

AS long as she or her child says that. I don't think the abuse was actually proven or that the husband would have been even sued. Most criminal women blame men because it's a good defence strategy, not because it's necessarily true.
/r/MensRights18/07/18 05:21 AM
9

They admit they have failed without actually saying it. OR they are feminists and think they've succeeded. Hard to tell because feminists don't think like real people. They live in a world where pretty much everything is upside-down, lies are truths and so forth.
/r/MensRights17/07/18 05:34 PM
9

Most of the time Feminist lie but this time they tell how it is. Nowadays. When girls and women have all the power in these situations.
/r/MensRights16/07/18 05:53 PM
2

A couple of studies (these things rarely get studied/published because the results tend to be against the dominant identity political imperatives that scare wrongthinkers away). http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-06-30/bilnd-recruitment-trial-to-improve-gender-equality-failing-study/8664888 https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1up6nj/employers_favor_female_over_male_applicants/ They aren't the only ones but you have to look up them for yourseldf if the red pill doesn't taste too bad. :D
/r/MensRights16/07/18 05:01 PM
2

Do you know that men are far less likely to be called back compared to women and that men get longer sentences than women? I'm sure that as a typical ignorant feminist person you don't think that is a problem.
/r/MensRights16/07/18 08:00 AM
3

Ban racism AND sexism. That is something these Feminists are taught to ignore when they want to demonize their ENEMY. That is a step towards totalitarianism (like Fascism or Communism - or Feminism if their ideology triumphs over civilization).
/r/MensRights16/07/18 07:57 AM
8

Another big problem Feminists have is that they are most of the time wrong. Their arguments are not based on facts but they are propaganda based on cherry picking or nothing at all designed to advance an ideology.
/r/MensRights15/07/18 04:45 AM
2

The war was fought by 99.9999999999999999% men. Sure, but what was the real figure if several hundred thousand women fought as Wikipedia claims? It's impossible to say because nobody knows the actual figures of male or female soldiers. But it seems safe to say that the number of women, who actually fought in combat roles, was below one percent - but not much below. But if you exclude the anti-aircraft troops then the share is is far smaller.
/r/MensRights14/07/18 06:20 AM
3

Governments aka politicians aka taxpayers are, naturally, the biggest contributors. Next comes people who donate to feminist organizations aka useful idiots aka ignorant people. Firms like Google seem to be very enthusiastic about Feminism and hire a lot of those "innovators". And I'm sure true Feminists contribute something, but how much? One percent? More? Less?
/r/MensRights13/07/18 07:53 PM
2

You are yourself forgetting that there were divers from other countries in addition to Thailand, the USA, Briatain, and Australia, at least from Belgium, Finland, Canada and Denmark.
/r/MensRights13/07/18 06:24 AM
1

The Thai rescue operation was no small task, thus why only the elite Thai Navy SEALs were up to executing it. More than 30 U.S. military personnel from the U.S. Pacific Command and at least three British diving experts also offered their expertise to aid the unit. There were divers and other rescuers from almost two dozen countries. Why does she want to forget the rest? Typical Americentrism from a US writer? Hell, even the word Americentrism is Americentrist, implying that America and the USA a…
/r/MensRights13/07/18 06:18 AM
47

Boris is a rat leaving the sinking ship and trying to save his face by lying.
/r/MensRights12/07/18 09:18 AM
5

A crazy Feminist narrative in action.
/r/MensRights12/07/18 04:34 AM
2

Yeah, they thought, rightly so, that a woman facing mild discrimination will raise more anger than a man facing the same kind or more severe discrimination, even when many men got lynched.
/r/MensRights12/07/18 04:31 AM
6

The victims were young, mostly teens, not men. The rescue team was described as (alpha) male heroes whose extraordinary bravery we like to admire in movies, real-life stories and the like. Even many feminists must acknowledge deep inside that it's men who are going to rescue them in catastrophic situations. But perhaps the only "crazy" thing about the whole incident was that, at first, it was widely speculated that the boys could be left in the cave for several months. I wonder if the media had …
/r/MensRights12/07/18 04:25 AM
7

Nothing new here. She's advocating for the wage gap argument: people should be paid the same for the same or similar jobs regardless of how productive they are. If she wasn't, the would be strange for a Feminist. The "wage gap" is one of their core arguments/myths/propagandas.
/r/MensRights11/07/18 04:36 AM
2

It's a pity that basic ideas of how the world works have to be explained over and over in these kinds of articles. No, not all the men are the same, not all the women are the same, there are differences between people and certain things are more likely in women than in men, and vice versa and that's why women and men tend to live on average different lives, have different occupations. It's like as if the sports reporters explained over and over again that big boxers tend to be stronger than smal…
/r/MensRights10/07/18 08:36 AM
30

In letting her walk free, the Crown Court judge “placed too much emphasis on her problems and difficulties, and insufficient emphasis on the consequences for the victims and for the criminal justice system”, she added. Too much emphasis on her sex. Isn't that the most obvious reason for the lenient sentence in a country that officially wants to abolish women's prison sentences for almost all crimes?
/r/MensRights10/07/18 08:02 AM
38

There's even a word for the quality of the lesbian sex life: "Lesbian Bed Death".
/r/MensRights10/07/18 06:37 AM
32

A young man—older than me but younger than 30—maneuvered me away from the crowd. There were many shadows, and he stood too close. He looked at me with predatory eyes. He backed me into a hedge, rubbed up against me. And I got away from him before it went any further. That was toxic masculinity, before the phrase existed. Here's my story: I was 19 and worked in a food processing plant for the summer. Went into an elevator with about five women. After the doors closed, one of them grabbed me by th…
/r/MensRights10/07/18 06:10 AM
11

It's hard to understand why any man would want to become a politician, huge risks. And that's perhaps the big problem. Democracy won't work if men start to avoid politics.
/r/MensRights09/07/18 06:49 PM
6

Sexism aka feminism is a very similar mental disease to what racism and Nazism are. It makes people think that Jews (as a class) rule the world or men (as a class) hurt women. Crazy shit that millions of people believe.
/r/MensRights09/07/18 06:26 PM
29

A feminist once said in an interview in a women's magazine that when she found out that she's pregnant with a baby boy, she became stressed because she wasn't sure if boys can love their mothers and not hate them. Feminism is kind of a sickness that prevents you from seeing even the most obvious facts - like the fact that boys tend to love their mothers more than perhaps anybody else.
/r/MensRights09/07/18 04:30 PM
1

Why did God do that and didn't put the same virtues into women? By the way, sometimes it feels that the public doesn't care about men. If it did, why would we have all those big problems regarding homelessness, education, circumcision etc. etc. Then again we have had recently at least two big media hullabaloos about men and boys stuck underground.
/r/MensRights09/07/18 04:21 PM
3

if simon says you have to believe
/r/MensRights09/07/18 08:54 AM
7

Both women and men are biologically wired to favor women, feel more empathy towards them, feel that they are discriminated against even when they are not. That's not going to change until we're liberated from our biological bodies and move to our individual realities - and even there we want to help women because, well, we want to.
/r/MensRights09/07/18 08:39 AM
21

I've been groped by several women and couple of men. Didn't like it but don't think about it (unless I'm reminded in posts like this). Life happens.
/r/MensRights08/07/18 04:10 PM
4

Are you suggesting that the mutes have something to do in a discussion about the victims?
/r/MensRights08/07/18 07:04 AM
13

I’m betting that the millennial gender war is a figment of the political circus, and will be washed away by the giant force looming on the horizon: parenthood. Parenthood is out, and is going to be more so, because women don't find men that qualify as husbands in their opinion. At some point even western societies are going to accept polygamy as the solution. Then again, nobody knows how the AI/VR world is going to look like in 50-100 years. Probably something completely different. Hell, I would…
/r/MensRights07/07/18 07:17 AM
100

Why isn't he stepping down? Or does he think that the standards he has advocated for don't apply to himself?
/r/MensRights07/07/18 05:37 AM
1

All cultures have toxic sides. Some cultures have more of them, like Islamic culture has more toxic features than other religions. A slum culture has more toxic features than a suburban culture. The list is endless; nothing that is created by people is without "toxic" sides. "Toxic masculinity" has become fab because despising men is ok and the number of female journalists has surpassed the male ones.
/r/MensRights07/07/18 05:31 AM
3

I was once banned because I mentioned that lesbian relationships are more violent than straight ones. This wasn't Twitter, tho, but a political (Green) newspaper. Lesbians are seen as a vulnerable minority worth a lot of protection. (And at the same time, I've seen increasing number of female celebrities becoming lesbian. If lesbians are discriminated against, why female celebrities want to monetize by becoming lesbians. Go figure.)
/r/MensRights06/07/18 07:36 PM
2

I still don't know what you're aiming at. Apparently, you thought you had something clever to say but then realized you didn't know what it is. ;) But never mind, stupid people are like that when it comes to difficult issues.
/r/MensRights03/07/18 09:24 AM
2

Not all good theories predict anything (say, the Big Bang theory) and there are lots of theories that can't be rigorously tested in that sense either because of moral or methodological problems. So, we've got all kinds of theories or generalizations that are seen as self-evident, that predict very well, but aren't tested in the scientific sense. I'm not sure what you're aiming at, so won't go any deeper. Just remember that everything can be doubted - but if everything is doubted we can't know an…
/r/MensRights03/07/18 08:36 AM
2

A dying tradition?
/r/MensRights03/07/18 07:08 AM
3

Like in the Winter War or in 1944 in Finland or in Afghanistan or Ukraine? Ther is absolutely no way of knowing how long Finland would last - or Russia, for that matter, if it decided to attack the EU and a country that is allied (or, at least, has co-operation agreements) with Sweden, other Nordic countries, the EU, USA and the NATO.
/r/MensRights03/07/18 07:02 AM
3

LOL, you do have some entertainment value, I have to give you that. But doesn't trolling get boring after a while?
/r/MensRights03/07/18 06:46 AM
0

The defense minister thought that the military needs more money and used popular tactics: threaten that women could be discriminated against and it certainly will make big headlines in media. Of course, he knows that anything even slightly harming women is not going to fly. But the need for money got discussed and rose to the political agenda. Likewise, there have been proposals, as the article states, to expand the "conscription" so that most young people, men and women (or women and men, as th…
/r/MensRights03/07/18 06:42 AM
4

You talk about empirical facts and don't seem to understand scientific theories (generalizations) that explain those facts. It's like saying that history (which can be seen as a collection of facts loosely bound together with more or less arbitrary narratives) is the only true science and something like physics (which can be seen as a collection or relatively few facts and strong, tested theories explaining those facts) is without any scientific merit.
/r/MensRights03/07/18 05:25 AM
1

Exactly. It would be crazy to claim that the explanations of the world and ourselves and the abstract goals we have, our consciousness, would be programmed into our genes.
/r/MensRights03/07/18 05:15 AM
3

This is, as always when we talk about the social world, about likelihoods. What is the likelihood of men getting better by seeing a female vs. male therapist? We know that men prefer male therapists, but are not offered one because there just aren't enough male therapists. A bad start for a recovery. The situation particularly bad if the problems have to do with sexuality and/or women. What if a man is depressed because he can't connect with women - and then is supposed to talk about it with a f…
/r/MensRights03/07/18 05:01 AM
18

But why shouldn’t our standards change over time? Most of the people in the 1850s who thought slavery was an abomination would have rejected the idea of inter-racial marriage. Wife beating wasn’t considered a violent crime in just the very recent past. What racism and sexism mean has changed over time. Are these examples of concept creep or progress? I’d argue progress but the blue dot experiment of Levari et al. suggests that if even objective concepts morph under prevalence inducement then sub…
/r/MensRights03/07/18 04:13 AM
11

Women tend to make the final decision and they favor girls, girls are easier to bring up (they tend to be more docile), boys are more likely to have medical conditions (psychological problems, too), an unknown male person is stereotypically seen more as a threat than somebody who needs protection (compared to a female person), people tend to consider girls and - later on - women more dependable and caring (which is a good thing, particularly, when you worry about your senior years) girls are mor…
/r/MensRights02/07/18 01:34 PM
1

"Jews created the word 'racism'". Sigh, how stupid, uneducated, and immoral can you be and still get access to a computer with an Internet connection?!
/r/MensRights02/07/18 12:59 PM
3

Sounds a bit like a "racist" generalization. Though it's possible you're right I wouldn't be so sure. Not all Africa is the same. There are very peaceful countries in Asia and pretty peaceful even in the Middle East. That is not to say that the USA would belong to the same category as places like Syria or Afghanistan.
/r/MensRights02/07/18 07:57 AM
8

In other words, it's a typical feminist idea: control men's speech, actions, and even thinking to make the better-off sex even more better off, never mind what it means for the worse-off sex (although they don't accept that women are better off even when the statistics on well-being clearly prove that women are). Their goal is to make wrongthink, wrongact, and wrongspeak crimes, particularly if committed by white, straight men. And this is no joke, different attempts to make "misogyny" and antif…
/r/MensRights02/07/18 07:44 AM
9

Women tend to know very little about the male sexuality and how the sexual or other intimate relationships work from a male perspective. They don't know because very often nobody has told them about how things work for men neither in the everyday life nor in textbooks. And even if they are told, they tend to not take it all that seriously but prefer the "female narrative" that the culture feeds us in the media. If a psychotherapist is furthermore a feminist, a male patient with sexual or other i…
/r/MensRights02/07/18 05:40 AM
11

Ok. Where I live people see dozens and dozens of male groups and they don't feel they are threatening. But perhaps it's different where you live.
/r/MensRights01/07/18 07:51 PM
9

When I walk around in my city I see dozens and dozens of male groups and they don't make me feel threatened. Perhaps it's different where you live.
/r/MensRights01/07/18 07:32 PM
1

We’ve come a long way from the good old days when men had a right to sex with their wives regardless of women’s opinion on the matter (marital rape was legal in the US until the 20th century). AS a typical feminist, poor Reina hasn't heard of the possibility that the husband could have been the one who didn't want to have sex but was forced.
/r/MensRights01/07/18 08:01 AM
48

Feminist: White straight men drank half of my water.
/r/MensRights01/07/18 07:30 AM
7

I like to believe, despite what's trending, not all men are dumb. Yeah, I like to believe you're right. Wasn't there this Einstein who was a man? And I seem to remember a few others who weren't dumb. Seriously, even hinting that feminists and many women could be right when they demonize men as a group is, well, dumb.
/r/MensRights01/07/18 07:27 AM
-7

Instagram doesn't seem to know that the Internet is full of misogyny.
/r/MensRights01/07/18 07:22 AM
10

Feminism is about telling men how to speak and act, control us, setting the limits of the acceptable behavior. You can fight back: Just stop talking to women about serious issues.
/r/MensRights30/06/18 05:58 PM
53

For BuzzFeed women are like children and who would like to put children in prison? Feminism and misogyny are often very hard to tell apart - tough not the same way as feminism and misandry which are almost synonyms.
/r/MensRights30/06/18 05:36 AM
1

The theory is that if ADHD children are not medicated their interactions with other people won't work. That, in turn, will lead to other psychological and social problems (like low self-esteem, loneliness). Anybody who has interacted with an out-of-control ADHD kid knows what it is like. For some reason, this theory is more popular in the USA than in many other countries, meaning that the medication is started easier. Perhaps it has to do with the strong emphasis that is given on the civil socia…
/r/MensRights27/06/18 08:02 AM
1

My theory: After the finance (subprime) crisis, there have been fewer opportunities in the job markets. If you can't get a job before your degree, why not finish the education? I'm not saying this the only reason but it could be important.
/r/MensRights27/06/18 07:16 AM
1

The tide seems to have started to turn in 2007. That's good news. Of course, it's possible that the projection is right, but it looks like it'as just the average trend since 1969. If so, there is no reason to believe it's accurate.
/r/MensRights27/06/18 06:58 AM
2

Sexual selection was first proposed by Charles Darwin in The Origin of Species (1859) and developed in The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex (1871), as he felt that natural selection alone was unable to account for certain types of non-survival adaptations. (Wikipedia)
/r/MensRights27/06/18 06:44 AM
3

The fear women feel in the streets is a fear of the unknown, as one crime study concluded. Many women feel unsafe because they feel weaker than their possible attackers. Furthermore, they are more risk averse in all kinds of situations.
/r/MensRights25/06/18 08:07 AM
1

It's a fringe theory among the rest of the humanity.
/r/MensRights24/06/18 08:00 PM
3

When they realized that most critics didn't like the movie, they had a meeting and decided to play the woman card. I'm pretty sure that's the way it went. And that was probably the best card they had to play. If a "male" movie is treated the same way by the critics the makers don't usually have any card to play.
/r/MensRights24/06/18 08:44 AM
18

It's a big achievement for a teen boy to get a girlfriend after a lot of anxiety and wasted efforts. And how good it feels to have a girl by your side when you go out partying or walk to the school! I'm not a failure! And then a break-up: I'm a failure after all! I'm good for nothing. There's no future. For (most) girls, it's a different game altogether.
/r/MensRights23/06/18 05:41 PM
1

Patriarchy is a fringe theory, the same way as Marxism, racism and so forth. There are, of course, people who believe that the patriarchy theory explains the world or, at least, a big chunk of the world but the number of those people is very small. That's true even among the academics (who otherwise tend to be "leftist" more often than not). Read 100 random general history books and you'll find perhaps one or two mentioning the patriarchy theory as a good way to interpret the past. So, in essenc…
/r/MensRights23/06/18 07:31 AM
1

completely lacking in character Could somebody explain what that means, thanks. It sounds like a good "sociological" idea, that somebody doesn't have a character, but, then again, doesn't everybody have a character? Just interested because English isn't my first language.
/r/MensRights22/06/18 08:46 PM
15

Kevin Alfred Strom (born August 17, 1956) is an American White nationalist, neo-Nazi, Holocaust denier, White separatist and associate editor of National Vanguard. Voltaire was a French Enlightenment writer, historian and philosopher famous for his wit, his attacks on Christianity as a whole, especially the established Catholic Church, and his advocacy of freedom of religion, freedom of speech and separation of church and state.
/r/MensRights22/06/18 03:18 AM
8

I suppose that the average life expectancy is particularly low in Russia because so many alcoholics and drug abusers die particularly young. Men who have steady jobs and retirement plans probably die much older. "The risk of dying before age 55 for those who said they drank three or more half-litre bottles of vodka a week was a shocking 35%. Overall, a quarter of Russian men die before reaching 55, compared with 7% of men in the UK and about 10% in the United States." And then the downvotes ...
/r/MensRights17/06/18 05:22 AM
7

Women are afraid of pretty much everything more than men. And the modern world has answered by making the world safer or, at least, feeling safer - for women in particular. Women are more risk-averse as the scientific term says it. You could ask if irrational fears are a good reason to spend money. But you have to remember that we are talking about women here. Women's issues are always a good reason to spend money according to most politicians. nobody cares if they are fact-based or not (wage ga…
/r/MensRights15/06/18 04:35 AM
3

Boys and men are ridiculed, and sometimes beaten, back to their role if they show signs of subversive behavior. Women do it perhaps more than men by sexually selecting manly men
/r/MensRights14/06/18 06:29 AM
2

Feminists shouldn't have children.
/r/MensRights14/06/18 06:14 AM
1

As I tried to explain, Google is (almost) a monopoly. It's pretty rare that a company is almost a monopoly for so long as Google has been. That gives them false incentives - or no incentives at all - because there isn't any real competition. Other companies, that aren't monopolistic, might use sexism as a competitive edge (like Huffington Post or the Guardian). But that's something they have planned. It's political and rational. I hope that this clarified the opinion, fact, I was trying to tell.
/r/MensRights12/06/18 08:03 PM
2

Google has thousands of employees whose task is to correct the "mistakes" the algorithms make, tweak the results. But you didn't know that, did you? Silly you. ;D
/r/MensRights12/06/18 07:48 PM
6

Instead of "irrational" I could have said "political". Irrational and political. Satisfied?
/r/MensRights12/06/18 07:42 PM
18

I've been a firm believer in Google, that they try to provide the best results the customers are likely to look for. But this looks very suspicious. Google is, after all, very much like a monopoly, and monopolies tend to behave in irrational ways because they don't have to be afraid of competition.
/r/MensRights12/06/18 06:16 PM
2

Yeah, these arguments have little to do with rationality and a lot to do with values AKA moral arguments. Women are valued a lot and they are seen as weak, oppressed even. Men are valued based on their deeds, we don't have so much value unless we do something worthwhile - or behave well, like, never hit women.
/r/MensRights12/06/18 05:59 PM
3

The Quora OP seems to think that patriarchy is an essential part of the society and not a fringe theory based on misunderstandings and hate. I stopped reading after that became clear.
/r/MensRights12/06/18 05:43 PM
1

I don't think my son saw a single male teacher before high school. He was very lazy, did indeed think that the school was more for girls - but fortunately very intelligent (hell, if you can't brag about your kids what's the meaning of life!). So, he didn't suffer all that much in the end. And surely he had men to look up to, particularly his granddad. One of his best friends was a single son of a single mother. Very likable guy but he got lost, drug abuse and things like that. I like to think th…
/r/MensRights12/06/18 01:31 PM
1

I seem to remember a study indicating that there aren't big differences between male and female teachers, both favor girls on average. Male teachers are important as role models, though. There are more and more boys who just don't have any positive male role models when it comes to education (or in any respect). If all or almost all teachers are women - who favor "girly behavior" - the whole school start to look like a female enterprise. My younger son and his friends talked about this spontaneo…
/r/MensRights12/06/18 10:58 AM
1

Teachers discriminate against certain kinds of boys, particularly sullen, shy, reserved boys but also too "wild" boys. It's been studied. Schools should, after all, teach kids to become productive members of the society and girls tend to look better in this respect. And teachers tend to penalize (certain kinds of) boys.
/r/MensRights12/06/18 06:44 AM
0

Female teachers give, on average, boys lower grades regardless of their actual level of learning. The lack of male teachers, as role models, leaves many boys bewildered: education seems to be mostly something for women and girls. These kinds of things (I could carry on) seem to be pretty universal in all systems where women rule.
/r/MensRights11/06/18 08:15 PM
0

Generally schools discriminate against boys, or, to be more precise, certain kinds of boys.
/r/MensRights11/06/18 12:58 PM
-45

It's not exactly the same thing but pretty much the same stereotype at work there (men should be seen as predators when children and women are involved). Downvoting doesn't solve the problem. :D
/r/MensRights09/06/18 10:15 AM
-67

This goes for men in childcare or nursing, too, I suppose? Men should be seen as predators, always hunting for sex, after all.
/r/MensRights09/06/18 09:38 AM
3

Tha flair should read: "misleading title".
/r/MensRights07/06/18 07:34 AM
2

It's always disgusting to see people, who haven't earned the riches they re spreading, not being humble but giving advice on how to make money, and telling bout the injustices the people like themselves face.
/r/MensRights07/06/18 07:30 AM
17

It would crazy to marry a feminist. I think I'd rather marry a racist because a feminist always is on the brink of disrespecting you because of your sex. A racist wouldn't have any such tendencies because my "race" wouldn't be an issue for her (if it was she would not have married me)
/r/MensRights30/05/18 09:07 PM
6

They love to hate.
/r/MensRights29/05/18 08:26 PM
5

Another question: why is the, perhaps The number one equality discussion forum in Internet hosted by a firm that can't have ads here (the same way they have on feminists forums.
/r/MensRights29/05/18 08:04 PM
3

I have a professional relationship with people with whom I regularly talk about professional things, like, what does the future look like, how do you feel about this or that etc. It's called networking. The crazy thing is that nowadays I talk less and less with women. I know it's stupid but it's a feeling that I can't easily overcome. It feels slightly uneasy to talk with a woman about things like: what is your personal view" and "how do you feel". And that slight uneasiness just makes the diffe…
/r/MensRights29/05/18 05:29 AM
1

But people believe it, a strangely great share of people.. It can shatter your trust in your fellow men. :D
/r/MensRights28/05/18 06:06 PM
1

They want so hard to believe that they're good when they actually are not so good. Yeah, that's the way we humans are. But usually we can reflect ourselves better: "I try to be good but I know I often fail". A feminist thinks that she's the warrior for the oppressed group witch makes her or him always right. It's disgusting. It's cancer. We've seen it over and over again throughout the history. And it never ends well.
/r/MensRights28/05/18 04:24 PM
1

It would be extremely unreasonable to assume that a person who doesn't agree with you on everything is unreasonable. I'm not the madman you, in a very unreasonable way, seem to think I am. But what am I, then? Perhaps someone who has studied and even seen what unreasonable people can do to you and the society: communists, fascist, nazis, maoists, Khmer Rouge, Isis, islamist fundamentalists, christian fundamentalists and all kinds of dictators. Feminists? That was my question. Feminists hold nowa…
/r/MensRights28/05/18 07:32 AM
2

Although adolescent boys comprise a substantial majority of the population of unaccompanied and separated children, they are rarely the focus of policy discussions and are consistently left out of gender-based violence prevention and response efforts. Gender-specific research, policy guidance, and evidence of best practices related to interventions preventing the sexual exploitation of boys are extremely limited. Big surprise. The study found out that we know next to nothing about sexual eplotat…
/r/MensRights27/05/18 07:19 AM
2

For a child, a girl or boy, the safest person in the home is the biological father. That's been proven. But is the brother the next safest? I don't know but my guess that he is. Yeah, the brother (or sister) can do nasty things, but, when the push comes to shove, a brother is your best bet after a father.
/r/MensRights27/05/18 05:35 AM
3

Perhaps we can imagine a world where ore and ore men make a benefit cost analysis on that and decide it's not worth it?
/r/MensRights26/05/18 05:20 AM
9

Men and women tend to make deals between each other that offer both parties certain benefits. I don't think there's anything wrong with that. What's wrong is the crazy feminist myth that men benefit more than women. That women are somehow coerced to make deals that are against what's good for them.
/r/MensRights26/05/18 04:56 AM
1

https://www.theguardian.com/science/2018/feb/07/how-dangerous-is-jordan-b-peterson-the-rightwing-professor-who-hit-a-hornets-nest
/r/MensRights26/05/18 04:30 AM
10

Sputniknews is the voice of Kremlin. One of its main tasks is to discredit the EU. The radio documentary itself, by the Swedish broadcasting company, seems to be about a young man, perhaps 17 years old, these guys seldom tell their real age. He says, by the way, that he's been to Greenland which seems very unlikely - a return flight costs close to 3 000 euros. I stopped listening after ten minutes or so - too boring - but it escapes me why the reporter believed anything this Moroccan man had to …
/r/MensRights26/05/18 04:17 AM
1

Amnesty is feminist cancer par excellence.
/r/MensRights24/05/18 04:57 PM
3

A great answer. But perhaps the strongest incentive is to find somebody to love. Women love to love those guys that all women love - but in the end they want to have the "one true love". And that's how it works for men, too. I suppose. My wife is far from perfect ... but I love her. That's my final decision.
/r/MensRights23/05/18 07:38 AM
2

Most women- and men - want to have a partner of the opposite sex and enjoy that relationship. Your thinking is excellent but perhaps misses this one crucial point?.
/r/MensRights23/05/18 07:09 AM
0

I can give you links to dozens of similar articles if you just tell me how I can sense whether Satan lurks on a page or not.
/r/MensRights22/02/18 07:10 PM
0

Wanna try again? Nope. But you could start educating yourself by reading this article.
/r/MensRights22/02/18 06:48 PM
5

Yes, I can agree that it's gone out of all proportion. And yet, the number of these people, as I wrote, isn't as small as was previously thought. This article, if I remember right, estimates the share to be over 1%. Being born with a sixth finger doesn't mean that there is a gray area in the number of fingers humans have, it means that some humans might have more of fewer than five fingers for various reasons. There are actual people who don't know their sex. There are actual people whose sex no…
/r/MensRights22/02/18 06:37 PM
1

I know my sex. This not about trying to insult me but the gray area between or around the sexes defined solely by the XX or XY chromosomes. Are you saying that you can get somewhere a master's degree in science and think that things like cosmology and evolutionary biology are solely based on reproducibility? Sounds alarming.
/r/MensRights22/02/18 06:08 PM
-4

1) You chose to omit the other groups that can't be determined. Why is that? 2) Why do you thing, what makes you so sure that people who have such genetic or hormonal problems that they fall outside of your definition of sex are sexless? Couldn't it be that part of their humanity is to have this trait that is called sex, never mind what you think. 3) I already explained this and won't do it again. So, come up with something more interesting or I'll stop educating you. 4) Transgender people are n…
/r/MensRights22/02/18 05:48 PM
-2

Science is based on reproducible results First of all it isn't, not always, though many laymen seem to think it is. Second, what you wrote is meaningless unless you tell me what part of the gene theory or biology in general is not reproducible in your opinion. What I wrote, is after all, basic genetics and biology. Something more interesting. please, or I'll stop educating you guys. :D
/r/MensRights22/02/18 05:40 PM
-7

It's funny how you call the biologists who have studied this subject for decades "bone-headed transactivists" and get upwoted. While I get downvoted for saying a scientific truth that is backed up by the scientific consensus.. The social media is sometimes a weird place.
/r/MensRights22/02/18 05:33 PM
0

No it's not. Science is based on a thing called peer review. Look it up. It's educational. And this "Columbus against the flat earth" is utter nonsense, too. There was a scientific consensus that the earth is not flat, they even had known the radius since the ancient Greeks. Columbus thought that he knew better and that the globe would be half the size. Had he been right he would have died. Luckily for him, there happened to be a continent on the way. You can look that up, too, unless you want t…
/r/MensRights22/02/18 05:25 PM
-1

So you say that there are two sexes and then people who don't belong to either one, the sexless people. Then there are the scientist who say that there are three or four groups whose sex can't be determined: people whose chromosomes aren't XX or XY, people who have other genetic "disorders", and people whose development in uterus was disrupted so that their biological sex can't be told. Then there is the biggest group whose sex is totally an epistemological problem, because they haven't been stu…
/r/MensRights22/02/18 05:04 PM
-9

I think most people will disagree with you. Then again it doesn't matter for somebody who likes to side with experts rather than ignorant laymen.
/r/MensRights22/02/18 04:39 PM
-5

What a wonderful argument! :D Then again, I understand that it's hard to argue against the scientific consensus.
/r/MensRights22/02/18 04:36 PM
-3

Once again I get downvoted for saying something that is true! What on earth is going on? Are you guys anti-science? Stupid? Ignorant? Ask any biologist who knows about these things and he'll tell that there are people whose sex can't be determined (either because of genetic problems or hormonal "problems" during the early development). Hell, you can read it in any schoolbook on biology. There are hundreds of scientific articles discussing this fact on the Internet. Educate yourself instead of ar…
/r/MensRights22/02/18 04:35 PM
2

Sorry, I tested that it worked. But apparently not always. On the lower left side there reads Genders. Click and it shows the gaps.
/r/MensRights22/02/18 04:13 PM
-19

By the way, there are two sexes but the grey area between them is much bigger than people previously thought. Likewise, there isn't a clear cut definition of a sex (which explains the gray area).
/r/MensRights22/02/18 01:26 PM
5

When the weather is really bad (like snow storm, particularly slippery roads, fog) it's me who drives. Otherwise my wife doesn't care which one drives. And I don't mind either because I'm a better - much more experienced - driver. Likewise, when my work (consulting and construction) demanded that I had to get somewhere the alternative, when the weather was bad, wasn't to take a bus, like it's for my wife (office work). That kind of things are bound to show up in statistics.
/r/MensRights22/02/18 01:21 PM
3

http://www.oecdbetterlifeindex.org/#/00011001101
/r/MensRights22/02/18 07:37 AM
6

Is it a parody? No, apparently "Marcie Bianco, the managing editor of the Clayman Institute at Stanford University, columnist for the Women’s Research Center" is a real person in a high position. Ah, but it's gender research she's "researching" and teaching. That explains why her "facts" have to do with reality only by coincidence.
/r/MensRights22/02/18 07:00 AM
2

You got the cause mixed up with an organization. And besides, I don't care. In my opinion, is lost. Probably the SPLC has spoiled its reputation for good among those people who aren't ignorant. But what does that help when so many are and will remain ignorant?
/r/MensRights22/02/18 06:49 AM
4

Sorry to say, but your opinions are the same as what most of us had before we started to look into these things. We know how the ignorant think, how they accept the "truths" that the elite, media, schools feed them. We know how it felt when we still thought that the people in power are well-meaning. For example, it's not "always Feminists", though saying, that those others, the stupid people, think so, makes you feel good and superior. But at the very foundation, it's human biology that makes us…
/r/MensRights22/02/18 06:16 AM
5

It would be more helpful if we listed Feminist organizations saying hateful things, organizations like AVFM.
/r/MensRights22/02/18 05:51 AM
3

Didn't he say that after over a hundred years of being polite a more angry voice was needed? Because that seems to be the only way to get heard. In my opinion it's not the only way, but perhaps it has helped.
/r/MensRights22/02/18 05:46 AM
9

Yeah, that's how Finland is the most equal: boys are worse n everything. But actually the indicator for health was the number of healthy years. Furthermore, the "equal situation" wasn't the same number of healthy years but a couple of years more for women. That's how they got the health situation in Russia better than in Sweden. In Russia women have more than 10 healthy years more while in Sweden just 2. It's a Feminist rip-off that has been made to prove that women are worse off when they are n…
/r/MensRights22/02/18 05:28 AM
30

It's not only reading. Finland is the only PISA country where girls outperform boys in everything the tests measure. The gaps aren't as big in other subjects, but, the way things are going, they will be. The Feminist influence is too strong. On the other hand Feminists just celebrated that according to the WEF's Gender Gap Index Finland's educations system is one of the most equal n the world - as if they didn't know that the index is a Feminist rip-off. but it gives them the permission to carry…
/r/MensRights21/02/18 08:57 PM
1

So you're saying that her accuser is not only lying but was stupid enough came up with a lie nobody believes or should believe?
/r/MensRights21/02/18 08:55 AM
5

Back in the day I studied Nazis as a side project at the university and read their publications. There's something very similar going on here: hatred, propaganda, lying, stupid generalizations, immorality, self-righteousness ... And hatred.
/r/MensRights21/02/18 08:21 AM
8

Yeah, there have been a couple of female hockey players playing in lower male leagues. Soccer, rugby? My theory is that without supporting gear most women would be turned into mash in the upper leagues. That's because women's bones are weaker, bone structures are weaker, muscles are weaker. That politician would have many bodies on her conscious if they let her have her way.
/r/MensRights21/02/18 07:50 AM
2

Sound more likely causes.
/r/MensRights20/02/18 08:37 PM
4

There are lots of countries where there a broken families and no mass shootings. Actually, there are broken homes in every western country but in none there are nowhere near so many mass shootings as in the USA. Try to find the right cause!
/r/MensRights20/02/18 08:16 PM
1

I come from a culture where school shootings are very rare. I don't claim to be an expert but when there are so many shootings as there are in the USA, you should try to figure out whats's different in the rest of the world. The USA is a fine country in many ways. And, besides, your nationalistic rhetoric is very alien to men. Hating the USA! Come on!
/r/MensRights19/02/18 07:26 PM
1

Yes, everything has an infinitive number of causes. What the USA government should look into (after Trump, a assume) is what has worked in the rest of the world. Fatherlessness is something that has an effect, but it's also something that is very hard to change. And let's see how much downvotes this answer is going to get.
/r/MensRights19/02/18 02:15 PM
-11

You could have thought before posting. :D
/r/MensRights19/02/18 10:18 AM
0

I wasn't talking about gun ratios but fathernessless. But there seems to be some kind of a cult of guns that doesn't exist elsewhere. I'd tackle that among other things.
/r/MensRights19/02/18 08:59 AM
7

The shooter should be in that case mostly African american kids? No?
/r/MensRights19/02/18 07:42 AM
4

No. But banning guns isn't enough. What the Us needs is more public healthcare and different officials working together and with teens so that possible shooter are found and helped. I'm not saying that you're totally wrong. There must be situations, times and places, where what you said is true. But it's not a general rule - though it seems that you think so.
/r/MensRights19/02/18 07:38 AM
5

Here's the important question: what's different between the USA and Canada, Europe, and, well, pretty much every other part of the world where school shooting are rare. Is it really fatherlessness? Really!?
/r/MensRights19/02/18 05:39 AM
-9

Too many Americans with a gun fetish. And to find - and cure - the possible shooters you need more public health care. Well, that the way it's in he rest of the west at least.
/r/MensRights19/02/18 05:28 AM
2

Unfortunately they will remove it in all likelihood.
/r/MensRights19/02/18 05:13 AM
3

So, men and women do exactly the same work according to them. What else? That vaccinations kill babies an witches don't float? Clearly a magazine of high standards.
/r/MensRights19/02/18 04:54 AM
9

It's impossible for me to read an article that starts with this kind of ignorance: "Sexism is alive and well in sexual assault research, but this time men are the target" As if most studies weren't downplaying men as victims.
/r/MensRights18/02/18 05:41 PM
3

One important difference between men and women is that there are more men who can live with big risks and even enjoy it at times. It's partly a hormonal difference, I've been told. So ... perhaps hormonal treatments for women?
/r/MensRights18/02/18 04:40 PM
1

We're celebrating 100 years of working class men being able to vote here in the UK. The silence is deafening. Finland, allegedly, gave the right to vote to all citizens in 1906. It was celebrated in 2006 as the "first European country giving the right to vote for women". ("Allegedly" because Finland wasn't a sovereign country till 1917.) It's amazing how a lie can become true if it fits the narrative. But, anyway, here the women's suffrage movement was pretty general among all parties, left and …
/r/MensRights17/02/18 04:33 PM
2

The bulk of the people on the left were, of course, workers. Many of the leading figures were those that had an education AKA not workers. Not all but many. Anyways, I know for sure that the picture isn't black and white. Furthermore I know for sure that the leftist Feminism has leftist. working class roots. I know that "Feminism" is also something many middle-class and even rich women and men were involved in.
/r/MensRights17/02/18 09:58 AM
-1

Most Feminists nowadays like to think that both the middle-class and working-class women's movements gave rise to modern Feminism. Of course they sey so because it makes them more credible. But is it true? Perhaps it's different in different countries. But, at least n northern Europe, "Feminist ideas" were more powerful among the leftist parties and movements.
/r/MensRights17/02/18 09:11 AM
6

What they are saying, and I'm generous here, is that people don't understand how science, and particularly probabilities, work. And that can cause "serious dissension and disruption in the workplace". That's a fair assumption. But coming from a court ... where will it lead? I'm not familiar with the US justice system, but it seems pretty obvious that the court is saying: feelings are more important than facts, if people think that there are witches who should be killed it should be done never mi…
/r/MensRights17/02/18 09:01 AM
1

In countries where there were Socialist and Social Democrat parties women's rights movement wasn't solely something the middle-class women were interested in. Most leftist women - and men - advocated it. And before downvoting take into account that this is a fact.
/r/MensRights17/02/18 08:37 AM
7

The only misdeed he committed was that he didn't realize that certain scientific facts should not be talked about in a big company like Google. And I'm not joking. Most people understand that they have to keep silent about these kinds of facts if they want to keep their jobs and have a career. He didn't. That doesn't make him a villain. Just ... socially incompetent perhaps.
/r/MensRights17/02/18 08:02 AM
2

You don't want to comment here with your regular alias so you make a new one which inflates the numbers?
/r/MensRights17/02/18 07:34 AM
1

What about the California law?
/r/MensRights17/02/18 07:27 AM
3

It feels wrong.
/r/MensRights17/02/18 07:13 AM
1

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Essentialism
/r/MensRights17/02/18 06:18 AM
5

It's clearly a rip-off. Somebody has decided to make money with this particular issue. There are many similar cases out there: make an outrageous claim and make money. It's crazy that people don't see it.
/r/MensRights17/02/18 05:55 AM
-8

It's a rip-off. And advertising it here is a rip-off.
/r/MensRights16/02/18 06:58 PM
6

Want to make money on Amazon? Publish something outrageous, get publicity, and somebody will buy. Either because they are fools or they they want to write an Amazon Verified Purchase review saying that the book is evil. Or as a joke. What about this book? The publisher is named but this is the only book it has published. BUT why sell it as a paperback and only as a paperback? This kind of a scam is more profitable if you sell just Kindle versions. EDIT: Come to think of it, as a gift it sells be…
/r/MensRights16/02/18 05:48 PM
2

Exactly. There seems to something in young men that increases the probability, compared to women or, say, old men, or Asians, but only ever so slightly. And there have been women, old men and Asians shooting or taking part in shootings, too. Thus the mass shooters should be looked as individuals. To a see a young man and think that he's one of those who shoot people would be insane. But that's what this guy asks the reader to do. It's amazing how people can't conceptualize the world in this mann…
/r/MensRights16/02/18 09:19 AM
4

There are countries in Europe where universities are free and students get even paid by the state. Nevertheless the share of men has been dropping the same way as in, for example, the US.
/r/MensRights15/02/18 06:36 PM
50

I asked in passing a reporter of a major news paper about this. He said that I was wrong. The actual reason why the kidnapping got so big in the media was that at first nobody reported about it at all. And that was so shameful that afterwards the media decided to cover in a major way. Later on I checked with google and it turned out the his paper had made a one short news item on the massacres while it, indeed, covered the kidnapping in several long stories and columns - and they did it shortly …
/r/MensRights15/02/18 07:36 AM
23

Use Feminists ideas only if they can hurt men. That's because Feminists ideas are almost always false but it doesn't matter if only men are hurt (see for example the Duluth model). Don't they teach this in their gender studies or where on earth did the stupidity of the professor come from?
/r/MensRights14/02/18 04:00 PM
1

Racism meets Feminism.
/r/MensRights14/02/18 07:36 AM
1

If they are trying to condition women to see men as sex objects (the same way as women are for men) why aren't they more consistent? Why aren't they publishing nude photos of men? Well, somebody tired it with Playgirl. Nowadays the magazine has about 3 000 subscribers, of whom most are probably gays.
/r/MensRights14/02/18 07:34 AM
4

It wasn't normal 20 years ago for men. Or perhaps I live in a different country. So, it would be interesting to see pictures of the genitals of female athletes showing and male public cheering or something similar. But during the last 20 year or so the sportswear has become skimpier and skimpier, particularly for women. Sponsors apparently like female athletes who reveal their buttocks and wear tight shirts. Probably men like it, too - and perhaps women as well - but there are both men and women…
/r/MensRights14/02/18 07:21 AM
3

Google has an editorial policy that is enforced by Search quality and Spam teams. Furthermore they have over 10 000 outsiders who rank searches. Yet it could be, in this case, that the Googles algorithm ranks certain MRA articles lower because they have so few "good" sites linking to them. The Feminist articles, on the other hand, have "authoritative" mainstream media outlets, governments, big organizations etc linking to them. That puts them higher in the results. That's how Google mostly work …
/r/MensRights14/02/18 06:11 AM
2

Cherry picking and confirmation bias are what lead most people astray. When I read a Feminist discussion (or, if, nowadays) I often end up hating it because of one or just a couple of ideas/comments. The rest can be actually rational or at least not totally uncivilized. But that's not what I remember unless I make an effort to see the bigger picture instead of that awfully hateful and stupid comment.
/r/MensRights13/02/18 01:08 PM
4

I'd say that there are too many comments that make negative and biased generalizations about women, and they are getting too many upvotes. They aren't many, but too many. A few biased comments alone can be enough to make somebody make a negative generalization about the whole sub. Otherwise the atmosphere is amazingly rational. And that's rare anywhere where people discuss social problems, let alone on social media.
/r/MensRights13/02/18 09:44 AM
6

Never give money to "women's charities". They can even have so much money that they don't know what to do with it, as happened with the pink ribbon campaign. They even said that they were going to give money to other cancer related causes. Perhaps even against men's cancers!? Who knows ... But even so, it's stupid to not give money, when you give, to somebody who struggles with the sympathy gap when trying to collect money. There is, by the way, a breast cancer awareness month, too.
/r/MensRights13/02/18 09:29 AM
2

“The President of the United States just called you a liar.” This must have be the sentiment of the privileged groups through the ages when somebody have suggested that everyone should be treated the same before the law. Or have suggested that what you say shouldn't be considered more or less trustworthy based on your position in the society.
/r/MensRights13/02/18 05:52 AM
10

So, they decided to save money by offering the vaccination only to the girls because that way boys - who only have sexual encounters with the girls that have been vaccinated - won't get the cancer either. They could have decided to give it to the boys only ... no, just kidding of course. :D Had they done that the they would have been kicked out of the NHS in a couple weeks.
/r/MensRights12/02/18 10:23 AM
1

I've provided sources and, besides, what I said is true - unless you live in Saudi Arabia. Do you? You, on the other hand haven't provided any sources. But that's understandable because you are obviously wrong and thus there are no such sources that could prove you right. I don't know what's your problem - but, thank god, I don't have to. I'm done.
/r/MensRights11/02/18 05:26 PM
1

"Everything you see around you was built by white people". It's true in many of the finest place on earth. But it's only true the same way as "everything was built by men". Meaning that there can be places, and probably are, where it's true. But in most places there have been all kinds of groups men, women, blacks, whites, Asians, natives working together. And it's nowhere near 100%. But if you have decided to believe in a fantasy I'm afraid I can't help.
/r/MensRights11/02/18 04:25 PM
1

You can say nice things about men without being sexist, insulting women who have been building the civilization along with men. "Most of what you see here was build by men who often did it to support their families", isn't catchy but it's true. I'm sure there is a way to include women - or not exclude - in a catchy phrase that says something nice and uplifting about men
/r/MensRights11/02/18 03:44 PM
1

I don't think there's any doubt that women are the driving force by a large margin. Just take a look at any shopping center: for whom they are targeting most of the stuff? And not only consumer markets. I'm pretty sure that women have a greater influence on buying investments, like homes and even cars. Furthermore, almost everything that's sold and bought within any economy serves, in the end, consumers i.e. more women than men (the exception being public spending - and, of course, stuff that no…
/r/MensRights11/02/18 03:31 PM
11

Lots of really shady sources, too. Besides, it's self-evident that something like "women buy 91% of new homes" can't be true. It's possible that women have the last word in the decision, but even that sounds very unlikely - and something that's pretty much impossible to know with any certainty. Many claims on that page are similar.
/r/MensRights11/02/18 09:02 AM
1

But not women. LOL!
/r/MensRights11/02/18 05:27 AM
-4

"Everything you see around you was built by white people".
/r/MensRights10/02/18 08:58 PM
1

Sounds fair. Insurance is a competition between the insurers, who want to know everything about you and your risks, and customers, who want to tell as little as possible. It's unclear what the just and effective compromise is. I, for example, don't know whether the insurers should know the sex or not.
/r/MensRights10/02/18 08:42 PM
3

The Guardian: So what’s going on here? First, it’s doubtful that the insurance companies are simply ignoring the EU ruling and breaking the law. It’s pretty simple for people like me to test this, by changing my name from Patrick to Patricia on an internet quote engine and seeing if I get different results – and I don’t. What appears to be at work is that car insurance companies set a price very much according to all the other data they can find on you – without actually asking your gender. So t…
/r/MensRights10/02/18 08:25 PM
1

LOL! A website inflating the numbers of women in different industry sectors because ... eh ... that makes them feel good!? And even if the numbers weren't reliable that wouldn't prove wrong the obvious fact that there are women who, gasp, make things. Where do you live? Saudi Arabia?
/r/MensRights10/02/18 08:15 PM
5

In the EU it's illegal to charge men more than women or vice versa..
/r/MensRights10/02/18 07:49 PM
1

I can't help if you doubt something that is obviously true. http://www.catalyst.org/knowledge/women-automotive-industry http://www.catalyst.org/knowledge/women-male-dominated-industries-and-occupations
/r/MensRights10/02/18 07:17 PM
0

Yes there were. And it's obvious. Take a car. In a car factory there are lots of women. Construction work? The majority is men, of course, but there are lots of women, too. And so on. What's the problem?
/r/MensRights10/02/18 06:51 PM
1

I have no idea what are you talking about.
/r/MensRights10/02/18 06:41 PM
4

Maternal deaths?
/r/MensRights10/02/18 06:00 PM
11

Men don't die "at least a decade earlier" but a few years. The life expectancy for men at birth is typically about 5-6 years less (but men die more in every age group so for old people the gap is smaller).
/r/MensRights10/02/18 04:14 PM
1

In the 1930s it was Fascists and racists, in the 1970s it was Communists and other radical leftists, now it's Feminists and srexists.
/r/MensRights10/02/18 01:20 PM
1

It's not cherry picking, though it may look like it. It's pointing out a double standard and asking about the validity of the wage gap argument/theory.
/r/MensRights09/02/18 05:39 PM
-14

Yeah, there were lots of women building things we see around us. It's obvious - and sad that saying something that is obvious gets downvoted.
/r/MensRights09/02/18 05:27 PM
2

In totalitarian societies and dictatorships, like N. Korea, there can be oppression that has a goal, but not in democratic, free-market societies. In those nobody is really oppressed as a class; even the worst-off demographics have their successes. Why discrimination exists has to do with biology, certain historical stereotypes (that can be base on biology, too), and our aversion to what is alien to our core identity. Those affect women, men, different ethnicities, skin colors, short people etc.…
/r/MensRights09/02/18 08:34 AM
3

Typically the oldest son inherited. Daughters were given a dowry plus their husbands had a traditional or even legal obligation to provide for them i.e. daughters got rights to the land the husband farmed. What you seldom hear is that the younger sons had no specific rights (though parents or the oldest son could in practice try to help them). This is irrelevant, of course, in any discussion on equality because they were men. That's one of the reasons, by the way, why there tends to be a lot of …
/r/MensRights09/02/18 07:08 AM
22

I think it's the other way around. When women get together they often talk about men - boyfriends, husbands, men in general - and not always in a nice way. Actually, rarely in a nice way, I've been told. When men get together they rarely speak about women. Girlfriends and wives are talked about with respect. No? That's why we have Feminist hate groups but not "menist" ones.
/r/MensRights09/02/18 05:35 AM
2

talks about things I don't understand.
/r/MensRights09/02/18 05:05 AM
3

Could be a good idea and looks like an ad of an Etsy seller. Sorry, in case I'm wrong.
/r/MensRights08/02/18 04:35 PM
8

I've got two problems with this: 1) we can't be sure that he got treated fairly by Caltech, 2) and even if he was, shouldn't he be given a second chance? Here's what went on according to Buzzfeed. If the messages at the top are the worst he sent ... it seems more like a teenage crush than a crime leading to a recruitment ban for the rest of his life.
/r/MensRights08/02/18 09:39 AM
0

You are wrong on so many levels. Other NGOs have photos of boys, too. And even if PLAN is just being opportunistic, it doesn't make it less sexist. Also opportunists can be sexist in their opportunism. Furthermore, PLAN actually helps boys only if they can thus help girls. They say so. And furthermore, it's sexist to believe that you can't get donations by telling that you want to help boys. You have to work harder but it can be done. PLAN is sexists and the pictures tell that pretty convincingl…
/r/MensRights01/02/18 07:08 PM
1

UNICEF wants to help boys, too, apparently. World vision likes girls more but not so much as PLAN.
/r/MensRights01/02/18 06:00 PM
1

Ben Child: Just because we do not always approve of [Bond's] behaviour does not mean we cannot continue to enjoy his adventures.
/r/MensRights01/02/18 12:47 PM
3

Finland isn't Norway.
/r/MensRights01/02/18 12:42 PM
8

I once interviewed a fitness celebrity and asked her: "What is sexy". She started talking about women - breasts, curves, buttocks - understandably, I guess, taking into account her profession. But, when I asked what is then sexy in a man, she went silent for several long seconds pondering the question. In the end I got almost nothing out of her but a few vague ideas of strength and self-confidence. I later on checked that she was straight, or at least married.
/r/MensRights01/02/18 08:14 AM
6

The next step is to ditch the drivers because they are all men. Besides, women like them because they are so manly. If that's not sexist what is?
/r/MensRights01/02/18 07:47 AM
2

an investigation by workplace consultant Fiona Bigelli, who was hired by the show's production company December Media, has cleared McLachlan of sexual harassment, sexual misconduct and workplace bullying claims. I wonder why the production company didn't find itself and an actor that was making money for the company guilty. Hmm ...
/r/MensRights01/02/18 07:39 AM
8

Actually Finnish boys are better than most other boys. But it's true that the gap between girls and boys is among the widest in the whole world (PISA was done a few years back so that there were also non-OECD countries, and even in that group of about 80 countries the gap in Finland was the widest). Perhaps a more remarkable thing about Finland is how the government, officials, politicians, and media has dealt with it. For years nobody seemed to know about it at all. "Everybody" was praising how…
/r/MensRights31/01/18 07:15 PM
11

About 80% of new startup founders are men. More than 90% of the primary inventors of patents are men. The list, showing that it's men who are behind most of the progress we see around us, could go on: Nobel prizes and other scientific awards, the CEOs in in the most innovative firms etc. etc. This is just a fact. Would Feminists be satisfied if medical progress, for example, slowed down dramatically? Would women have been happy if Amazon or Zalando had not been invented? Besides, if anything, it…
/r/MensRights31/01/18 08:47 AM
2

Clearly people, not only "sleepy masses", don't see the world as it is. It would be insane to claim that I see electricity or the Arab-Israeli conflict - or the power relationship between men and women, for that matter - as it is. To say that we see the world (to a great extent) through stories, narratives sounds right. We love, after all, stories, love to read them, watch them, tell them, and so forth. We people are story-telling creatures - when we are not analytical. And most of the time we a…
/r/MensRights30/01/18 06:50 PM
3

My son is confused about why women dress in sexy clothes. My son id confused about why women act sexy in front of attractive men. My son is confused about why I watch those movies where sexy women act sexy to get a man. My son ... aaargh, just shut up, boy, and let me live in my fantasy world.!
/r/MensRights30/01/18 04:45 PM
2

The world today isn't fucked up, particularly the western world of science, democracy, medicine, peace, and prosperity, compared to what was and still is in large parts of the "non-white" world. I'd say that, on the contrary, somehow this part of the world kinda made it for the first time in the world history.
/r/MensRights30/01/18 05:11 AM
2

Thanks for the answer. I was thinking about Magna Carta guaranteeing the freedom of assembly or something similar. Or perhaps the Treaty of Lisbon?
/r/MensRights29/01/18 01:58 PM
8

Theses people are among the most privileged in the world, and the SJWs are the privileged of the privileged because they control the discourse and the work environment. And feel good because they, after all, the good. Everybody who matters is telling them that. Now they are fought back in a serious way, perhaps for the first time in their adult lives. Of course they feel threatened.
/r/MensRights29/01/18 01:49 PM
3

Doesn't Britain have a constitution that doesn't allow discrimination based on sex?
/r/MensRights29/01/18 01:36 PM
2

In countries where universities are free the gap is at least as big.
/r/MensRights28/01/18 06:23 PM
3

The leader of a Feminist party was asked a question about these kind of facts. She said that it's true that the patriarchy hurts men in a many ways. What she said after that I don't know because I switched the channel. Listening to Feminists hurts sometimes too much.
/r/MensRights28/01/18 04:58 PM
49

The original works if the male customer buys into the fantasy that he could become the kind of alpha male women admire (by buying a tie). The same idea has worked in many, probably millions of ads, though nowadays they don't do it this clumsily. The roles reversed version doesn't work because female customers don't usually fantasize about submissive men. If the man was kneeling before her, holding her hand and looking into her eyes, not showing submissiveness but admiration, that would work - an…
/r/MensRights28/01/18 04:17 PM
12

It sounds true within the Feminist narrative, I suppose. But for the rest of the people? Doesn't it sound like obviously false if they think about even for a few minutes? Unless they are racists and think that "somewhere over there" fathers are different and don't take care of their children.
/r/MensRights28/01/18 02:33 PM
3

My son once wanted to become a nurse. I said something like: There are male nurses, so why not. But why choose a career where your sex can be a problem when there are dozens of careers where it isn't? Now he's studying programming (something he chose all by himself).
/r/MensRights28/01/18 01:48 PM
18

Here's a redditor who claims to have found the - misquoted - source.
/r/MensRights28/01/18 01:29 PM
6

I think it boils down to the fact teen boys tend to dream of sex but can't get any. So, they are considered lucky if a (good-looking) woman gives them sex. (For girls it's considered almost completely the other way around.) Many teen boys actually like the experience (as do girls). But that doesn't make it right, particularly if the woman (or man) is in a position of power.
/r/MensRights28/01/18 10:40 AM
8

They want men out of colleges, as well, because that's where the new leaders come from. And they want that the men to know that no position is high enough. Women can get you kicked out nevertheless. I don't think that it's a conspiracy, though. It's more like an attitude. They want women to rule. So, every step to that direction is, at least, potentially good. And, even if you thought that it's not good, you know that it's better if you don't say it aloud because everybody else seems to think it…
/r/MensRights28/01/18 10:14 AM
14

"I think that if you have to ask you're not ready to have any meaningful discussion on men's rights and problems. Perhaps you should take a look at things like the education gap, conscription, court bias, mortality, suicides, alcoholism and drug abuse, safety, violence, homelessness, loneliness, happiness, organizations helping and men men vs. organizations helping girls and women and so forth. Then come back and we can discuss if we need a movement for boys and men." If you are talking to a Fem…
/r/MensRights28/01/18 09:54 AM
3

Not really. The defense is seen as a question of survival and, as such, there is no room for gender politics or other trivialities. That seems to be the general atmosphere among most citizens, men and women.
/r/MensRights28/01/18 08:04 AM
3

AFAIK serving is or will be in practice voluntary in those countries. Which means that the combat troops are - or are going to be - heavily male dominated. If the country's existence was in danger it would be crazy to consider anything else. The big difference, and the reason why the Finnish generals want "all" men (more and more men are actually exempt from serving) and the voluntary women, is Russia. The military thinks, perhaps rightly so, that the efficient way to use the scarce resources is…
/r/MensRights28/01/18 07:58 AM
7

Exactly my thoughts - though the burden isn't so bad as it used to be. Most men serve just six months - and then later in life a few weeks or months. And it's crazy to compare having babies to preparing yourself to shoot people and be shot at.
/r/MensRights27/01/18 09:32 PM
3

Good luck with your blog. You write well. :D
/r/MensRights27/01/18 09:16 PM
12

Organizations like McKinsey or WEF hire these genders study experts to produce propaganda for the Feminist Industrial Complex (FIC) which pays good money for it. That IS good business! But, unfortunately, it works only on small scale. After all, there has to be firms that can produce the tax revenue on which the FIC operates. And those firms have to do something useful.
/r/MensRights27/01/18 09:12 PM
13

Not for a small country that has almost 1000 miles long border with a country that has been fighting with its neighbors two times during the past decade or so and even occupied a part of it's neighbor. In a situation like this, a strong army defends peace - by defending independence.
/r/MensRights27/01/18 08:50 PM
4

The thing is that, if you say your campaign's main theme is the equality between men and women, you shouldn't have opinions that are unequal, let alone extremely so. It's the same with all candidates: if you say, say, your campaign is based on nationalism and xenophobia then your opinions should mirror that theme, without considering what your electorate might thing. If you can't do that, you have chosen a theme you don't really support. Niinistö and Haavisto have had - alarmingly - sexist, Femi…
/r/MensRights27/01/18 08:41 PM
2

Men suffer much more emotionally (and financially). Women, after all, initiate the divorce much more often. Women tend to have better social safety nets, particularly if the husband has concentrated a lot more on his career than the wife on hers.
/r/MensRights27/01/18 07:28 PM
15

Because it was deemed unfair when they weren't allowed.
/r/MensRights27/01/18 06:13 PM
11

For her "excuse" can be said that as a Feminist she knows very little about thing like, you know, equality and stuff. It seems that the question surprised her. Apparently she had never thought about the biggest equality problem in Finland: only men are drafted.
/r/MensRights27/01/18 03:30 PM
1

There definitely is a threshold but it would bee foolish to claim that every family had crossed it at some point or will cross it at some point in time. The other point was that if you ban children from working you'll give parents a very strong incentive to increase their income, spend money better and put kids to school if that is possible. Those are two really simple. Of course it could damage the economy and an unacceptable number of families in some cases. But that's another, empirical quest…
/r/MensRights26/01/18 05:54 PM
1

It's not like gravity because gravity doesn't have a will of it's own and it doesn't respond to incentives. Furthermore it's wrong, without any doubt, to say that there was a point in time after which all people could afford non-working children. Even today there are parents, even in rich countries, who force or let their kids to work because of the financial situation of the family. The bottom line is that, though there will "always" be kids who work, it's good to give parents and everybody els…
/r/MensRights26/01/18 01:13 PM
1

That's what many stupid people think. In other words: a lot of people are stupid. You just have to learn to live with it or become a hermit. I, for example, don't even try anymore to discuss politics with most people.
/r/MensRights26/01/18 11:56 AM
11

r/depression seems to have 322,247 readers. Sounds like a good start. Hopefully the atmosphere isn't too Feminist.
/r/MensRights26/01/18 11:46 AM
11

Thanks but no thanks. :) I'm not particularly interested to study this subject any more than I already did. I'm pissed off because newspaper articles and the like refer to studies that the readers often can't read. It's a bad practice. Almost as bad as the practice of putting these studies, paid by the tax payers, behind paywalls, in the first place.
/r/MensRights26/01/18 09:31 AM
1

Child labor is illegal in all democratic countries, at least in the west. If people didn't stop it by making it illegal, who did? Child labor was also made illegal in most countries well before the standard of living rose above the bare subsistence level for many families, particularly single mothers. Not to mention orphans. So, they had to come up with ways how even these children could get involved. The most obvious way was to sanction child labor violations and make schools free. If a family …
/r/MensRights26/01/18 09:23 AM
15

I don't "allow it to go on". I just don't have the power to stop it. Even if I was the prime minister I couldn't stop it. Why doesn't the well-meaning majority stop it, like they stopped, say, the child labor in the democratic countries? One basic reason is biology: we are hardwired to helps women and children, men are seen as helpers - also when they are leaders - at best and at worst as a threat . Another basic reason is the "Feminist narrative" that is build upon this biology: for example, th…
/r/MensRights26/01/18 07:35 AM
106

The article refers to a study whose abstract says: Female sexual offenders are significantly underrepresented in the literature. Largely due to a failure of our society to recognize women as offenders, we allow them to avoid detection, prosecution, and interventions like tracking, registration, or mandated treatment. But it doesn't refer to the study in order to bring up this problem in all figures trying to establish the prevalence of female sexual offences. Instead it refers to it to claim tha…
/r/MensRights26/01/18 06:24 AM
1

Yeah, making changes that favor one sex can indeed be called sexism.
/r/MensRights25/01/18 07:38 PM
2

They'll probably make the tests even more female friendly till a clear majority is women.
/r/MensRights25/01/18 07:37 PM
4

The sorry fact is that the WEF is nowadays, ever since it started publishing the so called Gender gap index, a Feminist organization. The index doesn't measure in any way the gender gap, which is something you would expect from Feminists but not a internationally respected organization. So, why should I believe that they have actually studied the subject in an objective way? Nothing.
/r/MensRights25/01/18 04:35 PM
10

Yeah, the "research" was done by a police force which the author thinks is not up to the task of finding the innocent among the guilty.
/r/MensRights25/01/18 02:13 PM
2

AFAIK theere are three problems with the article: Males are not the same in every species, in some species males and females act very much the same way and in others males behave in a "female manner". Animal populations do have cultures of their own and if, for example, the males are much stronger than the females, the culture will "oppress" females (for example in the wild male chimpanzees act a lot more violently towards the females than in captivity). Of course the alphas can and often are ev…
/r/MensRights25/01/18 02:03 PM
8

I'd say that most good-looking - young - men have been groped. For famous or even quasi-famous good-looking men, like rock stars or athletes, it's a real nuisance. Even policemen say that "too friendly" drunken women don't understand that the men are working and not there for the amusement of women. For women in similar jobs the problem doesn't exist, so, the problem doesn't exist to the society.
/r/MensRights24/01/18 09:30 PM
2

Opportunities are for individuals, making social wrongs right are for groups.
/r/MensRights24/01/18 09:11 PM
4

Reflecting on her perception that she loses either way, and that men have it much easier I just had to stop reading. And what has Ansari to do with anything? The game has been "rigged" in favor of women for thousands, if not millions, of years.
/r/MensRights24/01/18 04:43 PM
8

The goal of Feminists is to control men's thinking and acting. They don't see nothing wrong with it because they think that women are better suited to rule the world.
/r/MensRights24/01/18 09:37 AM
5

We humans are that way. We care about women girls, preteen boys, furry animals, and then men. In that order. That's why Feminism is so strong an ideology. You gotta do a lot of unlearning to care about men.
/r/MensRights23/01/18 07:33 PM
1

But that's world my sons have to live in.
/r/MensRights23/01/18 06:37 PM
2

Yeah, that's pretty much the story of womanhood - although not every woman believe in hating men because they want the alphas and almost always get disappointed time and again.
/r/MensRights23/01/18 05:26 PM
17

My wife would never say a thing like that to our sons. She simply has too much respect for them. She knows that our sons are normal, decent guys (with women and otherwise unbelievably awesome, taking into account who their parents are :) ). Besides, my sons know that it's women that we all are supposed to respect more. And I'm pretty sure they know who, which sex has the power in young peoples's lives. I mean, doesn't pretty much every guy?
/r/MensRights23/01/18 12:39 PM
1

I live in a country where these kinds of things are very rare (even this time the guy looked and spoke like a foreigner). So, yes, I was a fool because I wasn't prepared. Besides, in the back of my mind, I think I was protecting my wife in a situation that I didn't fully understand. Something threatening was going on, but what exactly? So, now when I think about it, my reflex could have been to put myself between him and my wife. Perhaps. I can't be sure because things like this happen so fast.
/r/MensRights23/01/18 12:09 PM
1

You mean how the majority of Americans are in the world's 1%? What? I try to understand but there seems to be no relation to any facts I know???
/r/MensRights23/01/18 10:09 AM
3

Thanks to all for your kind words. A few words of my owb: It all happened in seconds - in the way these things, I guess, tend to happen. What made me want to to step in was, I guess, that cashier was a woman and the instinct is to help a damsel in distress. Probably the fact that my wife stood next to me had something to do with it, too, though I realized almost immediately that she was in no danger. I talked to the policemen who came there to investigate and they said that I did the right thing…
/r/MensRights23/01/18 09:31 AM
2

No.
/r/MensRights22/01/18 10:47 PM
2

Emily McCombs, Parents Editorial Director at HuffPost No, no, noooo, no, no, no, no. She writing about parenting: no. No. No.
/r/MensRights22/01/18 10:46 PM
2

LOL, she didn't have a clue and called me names and I'm supposed to start a civilized and rational conversation with her?! How feminist are YOU thinking I'm the one who was stupid, retard? But I have no more time with you "clever guys", LOL.
/r/MensRights23/10/17 12:17 PM
4

Stop with that feminist stuff. And don't use the word "retard" when you get the urge to insult the next random guy you don't understand. You might not know this but there are actual retarded people who didn't choose to their condition - unlike you who decided to be stupid angry feminist and become ignorant loudmouth.
/r/MensRights23/10/17 09:43 AM
-3

Yet another feminist, I suppose.
/r/MensRights23/10/17 08:41 AM
1

So, I'm not saying that adults should have the right to fuck young teens. That's not what I'm saying. Nope. No way Jose. What I am saying is that you can have a good society even if the rapists, let alone alleged rapists who are actually innocent, are not put behind bars for decades, or perhaps for life. I'm pretty sure that the higher courts will give the man a harsher sentence for sexual abuse or something, though. But it's still possible that he won't end up in prison, and if he does the sent…
/r/MensRights23/10/17 07:51 AM
0

And that's why I wrote about likelihoods and men (and definitely not about children). As a side note, almost always when I talk about people and societies, I talk about probabilities, trends, and diversity. Black and white truths I leave to ideologies. Replacing facts - or probabilities and trends - with feelings I leave to therapists or to the situations where I try to be a "therapist". For some reason this kind of argumentation, that in my mind is the right way to argue, fails often. I blame s…
/r/MensRights23/10/17 07:14 AM
-7

So, saying what's true is ignorance, come on!
/r/MensRights23/10/17 06:37 AM
-4

It might seem sexist for somebody who didn't understand what I wrote. I'm describing something that's obviously true. Men and women tend to be different in this respect. What "tend" here means is that the likelihoods for certain behaviors are different between the sexes. I really hope that more men don't start thinking the same way as many metoo women: that they don't have agency but are doomed to be victims and feel like victims. That's a shitty attitude toward the life which means for us all a…
/r/MensRights23/10/17 06:36 AM
1

Most jobs where the expertise is the key skill will be gone. What will be left are creative jobs (if the AI can't grasp the human experience deeply enough because they haven't lived and don't have the human "subconscious" whose workings have been a mystery so far). That means jobs from planning in general to creating entertainment and programming (or the creative part of it). Then there are those jobs that have to do with connections between people, like customer service, therapy or nursing - or…
/r/MensRights23/10/17 05:07 AM
7

It's ridiculously hard to get a well-paying job in Amazon even for a woman. And then they expect you to sacrifice your private life for the company.
/r/MensRights23/10/17 04:43 AM
-56

It's different. It's far less common for men to have the victim attitude women often have. Likewise, men usually don't get trapped in the same kind of ruminating mode as women seem to get in. There are women who can take sexual harassment the same way as men usually do and then there are men and boys who feel like women tend to feel about it. But, then again, the sensitive and feminine kind of men don't usually get harassed. Actually most men get harassed very seldom because women consider so fe…
/r/MensRights23/10/17 04:28 AM
28

Women get heard so much better.
/r/MensRights22/10/17 07:07 PM
9

how could that possibly be one of the world's most gender neutral countries? It isn't. For example, according to PISA the skill gap between 15-year-olds is bigger than anywhere else (among the 70 or so participating countries involving also third-world and Arab countries). What's perhaps somewhat unique to the Nordic countries is that women have "always" been pretty equal, in Finland even more so. Nevertheless, feminism is as strong as anywhere. So, when you start off with equality and have femi…
/r/MensRights22/10/17 06:10 PM
11

Furthermore, feminists use victimhood to get the better-off sex more benefits and to fight the worse-off sex's demands of equality. Victimhood is the most important political capital feminists have.
/r/MensRights22/10/17 03:22 PM
5

seemingly out of nowhere. But how can ignorant people learn about feminism if nobody points out how the lie and hate?
/r/MensRights22/10/17 03:17 PM
1

Yeah, customers have biases. In service jobs, when the customer encounters the employer face-to-face, those biases do affect the productivity of the employer. But there is no proof that customers would favor male employers over female ones the way they favored whites over blacks (and still do, when it comes to black male employers, in particular). Employers, on the other hand, employ based on productivity (or their estimate of it). That's why young women, for example, out-earn young men in branc…
/r/MensRights22/10/17 08:59 AM
1

I saved a bunch of money by switching to hiring women only. Are we supposed to believe that just you have figured out that it's a good business practice to bay less for similar goods (like employees) than what the competition is paying? Are we supposed to believe that the cost of women's work is not affected by market forces unlike everything else. Meaning that a lower price increases demand and thus raises the price until an equilibrium is reached i.e. the price of similar goods is the same.
/r/MensRights22/10/17 08:52 AM
1

There can be all kinds of reasons behind a productivity gap besides laziness. For example, women tend to get paid more in many service jobs because people tend to like women more than men. So. women make more money for the employer, i.e. are more productive. That doesn't mean that those employers hate men - or that customers would hate men. Misogyny is probably the least likely explanation for any wage or earnings gap.
/r/MensRights22/10/17 08:44 AM
1

Ergo it's not a safe sub.
/r/MensRights22/10/17 08:35 AM
0

Women have the freedom of choice: work vs. family. Men don't - unless they are willing to go against the societal pressures and, often, their wives. Perhaps freedom is bad ,,,
/r/MensRights22/10/17 08:32 AM
5

Typical feminist shaming tactics.
/r/MensRights22/10/17 08:27 AM
2

Women have better job opportunities on average because 1) they're better educated 2) lots of firms and fields favor women in recruiting (and almost no field favors men unless the job is physically demanding or dangerous) Women also are projected to be wealthier than men in the 2030s worldwide. I suppose they are wealthier already in many communities. Never believe feminists narratives that the MSM and politicians feed you.
/r/MensRights22/10/17 08:20 AM
4

I don't think they had an advantage a few years ago. Favoring women has been going on for decades.
/r/MensRights22/10/17 07:17 AM
1

Economics is a social science while the rest aren't. Economists won't get fooled by the dominant narrative as easily as the rest of the STEM.
/r/MensRights22/10/17 07:16 AM
4

In my opinion history is at best good stories based on rigorous source criticism and critical self-reflection. Nothing more, nothing less.
/r/MensRights21/10/17 09:46 AM
5

Somebody already made, thanks!
/r/MensRights21/10/17 09:37 AM
2

Within the humanities there are fields that are base on critical thinking, history in particular.
/r/MensRights21/10/17 08:29 AM
9

Luke Anderson's mother, Rosie Batty, is a campaigner against domestic violence, which is overwhelmingly committed by men. Feminist are doing what they're best at: lying and smearing. Somebody should make the article more fact based and balanced.
/r/MensRights21/10/17 07:58 AM
1

Just Napoleon Chagnon, whom I highly recommend though I seem to remember that there have been controversies regarding his writings. The books are very enjoyable, nevertheless. Do I think that the Yanomamo men want to oppress women? Well, it seems quite obvious that they upheld a hierarchy with violence. Pretty much the same way as some (young) women do nowadays: control their men with fear of violence, physical or psychological. That's oppression, I guess.
/r/MensRights21/10/17 07:50 AM
1

I seem to remember that the last time a wife beater was whipped in public was in the 1950s in the US. Perhaps I got it from here: http://unknownmisandry.blogspot.fi/search/label/Domestic%20Violence (In theory, at least, also husband beaters could be whipped in some states. I don't know if that ever happened, though.)
/r/MensRights21/10/17 07:40 AM
1

Even in the most extreme patriarchal societies where eg a husband has the legal right to slap his wife, such violence is looked upon as degrading and dishonorable by men. That's not true. There have been, and still are, societies where men do - and even are expected to - discipline their wives, as well as children. Check out warrior cultures, in particular, like the Yanomamo, for example. The civilization process, particularly in the west, has meant among other things that men have lost that "ri…
/r/MensRights21/10/17 07:22 AM
1

There isn't a single game where women would be better than men. There's no mystery behind it and the reason has nothing to do with children.
/r/MensRights21/10/17 05:16 AM
2

Another incentive could be the satisfaction that comes out of beating a man - if women chess players do indeed feel inferior. But money is almost always a good incentive, too.
/r/MensRights20/10/17 03:30 PM
3

I agree. "Stereotype threat" is an issue when you're not competing directly against anybody. Put a (competitive) person against a higher ranked player and the psychological dynamics change dramatically. That makes sense in my opinion.
/r/MensRights20/10/17 03:25 PM
1

Yeah, there is an earnings gap and it's easy to calculate because most earnings have to be included in the taxes, i.e. the statistics are there and they are pretty accurate (depending on the country and the size of the grey economy). The earnings gap is mostly the result of the fact that men work more, though there are other factors as well. But an objective percentage on the wage gap can't be calculated exactly because we just don't know what variables should be controlled or factored out. Ther…
/r/MensRights20/10/17 09:43 AM
5

Besides, even in prisons inmates who have harmed women are on the bottom of the hierarchy right above those who have harmed children. That proves that they, too, have adopted the same "never hit a woman" norm as most of the rest of the men - if that even needs any "proving".
/r/MensRights20/10/17 08:31 AM
1

The wage gap isn't 5% - or, at least, there is no proof that it is. The actual wage gap is different in different areas and fields and time periods and ages. And because of the available data (or the lack of it) and unknown variables even the best estimates are bound to be right only by coincident. What we can say for certain is that sometimes men's average wages tend to be higher and sometimes women's. That's because sometimes men are more productive and sometimes women (depending on the things…
/r/MensRights20/10/17 07:27 AM
5

When the police talks about sex trafficking people tend to think that there are individuals who are treated as goods, sold from one owner to another. What it actually is about almost always is prostitution that is or might be coercive in nature. For example the prostitutes have been tricked or blackmailed into prostitution. Or they are simply underage. (By the way, the Wikipedia article on trafficking seems to be hijacked by feminists, making trafficking, you guessed it, all about women and male…
/r/MensRights20/10/17 07:13 AM
23

Many women have irrational fears (it's actually a well-known fact, within scientific circles studying crime and victims, that women tend to be afraid much more than the sex which is more likely to get victimized). For a few the fears are incapacitating. But so they are for a few men. It's called the anxiety disorder. Men just can't blame women for their anxieties.
/r/MensRights20/10/17 06:58 AM
9

a dangerous precedent being set I think it's a bit late for that. Women claiming sexual assault has meant revenge and exclusion or even murder for thousands of years. For the man, that is.
/r/MensRights20/10/17 06:48 AM
1

It's extremely unfair if the university doesn't tell the students that she is sexist and won't treat students equally. If I studied there i'd demand the university to be honest about it. If not, it's a fraud.
/r/MensRights20/10/17 06:40 AM
7

Probably because women tend to be sexist and in a democracy the gynocentric view is slowly winning over traditions that kept it at bay. (Not all but many women look down on men. If you don't believe me, find an honest woman and ask her how female friends talk about their husbands and men in general when they are alone. That's the source, or at least one of the sources, of everyday sexism that in a modern democracy tends to become almost like an official worldview .)
/r/MensRights20/10/17 06:31 AM
1

Blackmailing is probably a problem. A prostitute could ask for more money or she'd go to the police.
/r/MensRights19/10/17 08:42 AM
5

Women want less harassment which is a perfectly legit goal.
/r/MensRights19/10/17 06:47 AM
2

Women have more, much more power in relationships and on the "sexual marketplace" in general. And they are not only using it, they are also abusing it, because so many men are eager or even desperate to get what women have. Feminist cucks don't get this - or can't admit it even if they deep down might know something about how the world works.
/r/MensRights19/10/17 06:30 AM
3

In Sweden, Norway, and Iceland (and France and Northern Ireland) it's illegal to buy sex but legal to sell it. In Finland it's legal to buy (and sell) sex unless the seller is a victim of human trafficking. In Denmark buying is legal (selling is allowed only to residents).
/r/MensRights19/10/17 05:51 AM
1

Unfortunately I found only the trailer of this Oscar nominated short film of a woman who "completely bears the mental load" (there's a version dubbed in Russian on Youtube, though). It's called: Do I Have to Take Care of Everything? It's pretty funny.
/r/MensRights18/10/17 09:20 AM
13

I have a few friends in the music business who have talked about sexual harassment. The big difference between male and female stars seems to be that female stars are almost never touched (in a sexual manner) by the (male) fans, though they do hear quite often drunken slurs. Men hear them too, but they will also get kissed, touched, and groped after a late-night gig almost inevitably unless they manage to avoid the groups of eager female fans. The "normal world" is sometimes pretty much the same…
/r/MensRights18/10/17 05:58 AM
4

The mental load is almost completely borne by women. Don't they realize that they are undermining their credibility with these crazy claims? Or is it the same as with Nigerian scams: make it stupid enough so that the people with normal intelligent are filtered out and only those who are easily fooled get, well, fooled.
/r/MensRights18/10/17 05:23 AM
23

Pretty much all woman literally every day. LOL. "Literally"! I talked about harassment with my wife /who's an attractive looking lady. She said that she's been harassed once at work when she was about 20 years old and a few times in bars. Hell, even I have been harassed more. I'm starting to think that it could be that if there was a decent study about harassment it would turn out that it's men who get harassed more.
/r/MensRights18/10/17 04:51 AM
6

Yeah, it sounds like it. What I meant to say is: 1) It's well-known tactics to make people scared (of an enemy, most of the time) so that controlling them becomes easier. 2) For Feminists it often means spreading lies about men, how they oppress, act violently, rape etc. The more women are afraid of men, the more there is feminism. 3) Many institutions use these tactics, but cults in particular. Feminist groups resemble cults in many ways and this "mind control through fear" is one of them.
/r/MensRights17/10/17 08:28 PM
16

Scared people are easier to control. That's why feminists spread these lies. It's a cult.
/r/MensRights17/10/17 07:50 PM
2

Sounds absolutely great. One of the backers is somebody called Cassie Jaye.
/r/MensRights17/10/17 06:07 PM
8

I repeated a question from the OP's post. Then I contrasted it with a personal experience and personal feelings. I'm not saying that my personal problem is the answer to that big question but, then again, perhaps it is. It's up to the reader to decide. You missed all that. I'll try to make what I mean even more apparent the next time (though, I'm afraid, something might get lost when translating a dramatic idea into plain language).
/r/MensRights17/10/17 04:57 PM
30

Why don't men start these kinds of campaigns for men? That is a good question. Could it be that there are social and cultural forces that make it very hard? I have been sexually harassed by at least two women in the workplace (and by more women and even one man elsewhere). But I'm not going to take part in the metoo campaign. That would be ... whining? What kind of a man whines about such things? Is he really a man at all?
/r/MensRights17/10/17 03:19 PM
14

This forum, with all its flaws, is pretty much the opposite of radical feminism. There is no theory, not even a shared goal. It's more like a collection of everyday experiences and scientific facts - that prove or, at least, try to prove, that the feminist and gynocentric narrative, worldview , that radical feminists and often the elite fosters, is wrong. It's the kind of counter-talk that is common among the people who are no listened to. Not all posts but perhaps the majority.
/r/MensRights17/10/17 08:48 AM
4

The quality of life of women is already better than that of men (in the first world). I don't think there is any doubt about, it if you know how it's measured and then check the statistics and studies on the relevant indicators. At the same time we have a very powerful ideology and movement, Feminism, that can quite easily get women's issues on the political agenda. The same movement often frantically opposes the movement that is trying to bring up issues concerning men. That movement, MRA, has …
/r/MensRights17/10/17 08:15 AM
1

The Western civilization, the best what humanity has come up with so far: enlightenment, rule of law, tolerance. Though I don't like the way how democracy turns our animal instincts into laws and official practices it's still better than anything else I know of. that's why it's pity that it's going down the drain.
/r/MensRights16/10/17 04:10 PM
10

A bad infographic but the message looks about right.
/r/MensRights16/10/17 03:09 PM
1

Sounds like trolling. I don't know who's worshiping families. I just told you the likely outcome of the trend of discriminating against boys and men and letting them to get even more marginalized. And most western women are already making on average well under two kids in their lifetime, meaning that we are going to be extinct anyway. And who cares, good riddance. I won't miss this lifestyle that can't take care of itself. But, hey, I know that unlearning the "official" truths is difficult. For …
/r/MensRights16/10/17 02:38 PM
1

The widening education gap and increasing exclusion/marginalization are the main problems, as I said, not addiction, though it's part of the marginalization problem. And it's a vicious circle. And not something boys and men choose, necessarily. The education system discriminates against boys and so do teachers according to several studies. So the marginalization not something that young boys choose. And when the education gap is widening less men are getting married. When men can't have families…
/r/MensRights16/10/17 11:32 AM
1

Male politicians give benefits to their voters, not to their sex. Yeah, they sound like junkie problem if you can't feel empathy and don't understand what makes boys and men tick in a different manner. But understanding these things take so much learning and unlearning that you just have to start educating yourself. Or stop talking about something you know just what you have been told by the powerful. Of course all problems hit hardest those who are worst off to begin with. Normally that's not a…
/r/MensRights16/10/17 11:03 AM
1

The widening education gap and the increasing marginalization of boys and men (poor education, alcohol, drug abuse, no job, no family, prison, homelessness etc, etc) are going to be among the biggest problems very soon - even outside the gangland. That's because of people like you. And even if people aren't ignorant nothing or too little is done because the social dynamics for a change just aren't there. People don't care enough to start a fight against the powers that be. The support for the ri…
/r/MensRights16/10/17 10:45 AM
1

Perhaps. But "male privilege" is part of the mainstream political discourse, meaning it's a powerful word that is used to gain benefits for those who aren't (white) men or boys and oppose men's attempts to gain equal benefits. So, it's become a "trigger word" for many. And for a good reason.
/r/MensRights16/10/17 10:26 AM
1

You can see privileges everywhere you want, just choose the right angle.
/r/MensRights16/10/17 10:04 AM
5

Hillary Clinton didn't want to bomb Isis but Obama did. No, just kidding, it was the other way around.
/r/MensRights16/10/17 07:26 AM
8

The UN supporting sexist bullshit! I'm shocked!
/r/MensRights16/10/17 07:21 AM
1

"replace some blue-eyed men with others"
/r/MensRights16/10/17 07:16 AM
3

She thinks all boy schools are good. It even says so in the article. No, she doesn't. She doesn't have an opinion on that in the article.
/r/MensRights16/10/17 07:08 AM
4

She says that they are good for girls because the world is "loaded against women". She said nothing about boy schools being good for boys, just that "boys at all-male institutions may be more willing to take more interest in the arts". Perhaps the OP thinks that arts are not in the best interest of the boys. :D But, yeah, the title is misleading because she doesn't explicitly say that boys schools are bad for boys.
/r/MensRights16/10/17 07:03 AM
1

That's still male privilege though? The same way when women don't have to dress up in "uniforms" like men do (in "important" occasions). That's a female privilege. And so is a female privilege that women can dress up in all kinds of styles, for example feminine or masculine, sexy or casual and so forth.
/r/MensRights16/10/17 06:43 AM
3

"Privilege" is also being ignorant about problems that actually exist for others Yeah, women do that a lot. They don't seem to understand that the dress code favors them hugely and in many ways.
/r/MensRights16/10/17 06:31 AM
2

Was it a majority of men Or women who were burned as witches? Depends on the area. For example, in Germany in two neighboring cities one could burn more female "witches" and the other one male ones. You have to understand that most feminist claims are sexist bullshit. Never believe a feminist without checking out the facts for yourself. That's the sorry state of the affairs. And no other ideology has this privilege of spreading hateful propaganda the way feminists have. Why? Because almost nobod…
/r/MensRights16/10/17 06:21 AM
2

Ignorance never makes a good argument.
/r/MensRights16/10/17 06:12 AM
2

If we lived in a patriarchy men should be better off. Now women are (at least in the first world) according to almost all indicators measuring the quality of life. Patriarchy is a fringe theory, that looks more important than it is because so many people are afraid to challenge the powers that be.
/r/MensRights16/10/17 06:09 AM
2

It's true that people tend to think that a woman can't harm a man when push comes to shovel. But that has nothing to do with misogyny, it's a typical generalization: it seems to be true so often that using it is useful. It's like .. when people think that parents don't hurt but protect their children. It's not always true but often enough so that it's a useful, pragmatic generalization. But how true is it that women can't really harm a man physically. There are at least two levels: 1) when a man…
/r/MensRights15/10/17 08:24 AM
1

Then her mother and Ted surprise her with a puppy and a dog-training manual that proves to be a partial answer to some of her school dilemmas. Annabelle discovers that strategies in the manual can be transferred and tweaked to solve some of the boy issues at school. Using a mixture of confidence, ingenuity, and some excellent Swiss chocolates, she begins to change some difficult situations and behaviors for the better. This clever and humorous premise is deftly handled to create a believable and…
/r/MensRights14/10/17 03:38 PM
3

I think that women despise their husbands, and even men in general, everywhere (not every man or in every situation but as a general attitude). The degree of how feminist a society or any group is can be determined by how acceptable it is to make these sentiments public.
/r/MensRights14/10/17 03:27 PM
1

Why would the employers be so stupid in those isolated areas that they paid more to a person because he has a dick while they could get somebody with a vagina to do the same job cheaper? And even if they were so stupid, why wouldn't the firms outside the isolated areas come there and rob the market from the sexists? It just doesn't make sense. (It DOES make sense when we are talking about a group of people whom the customers on average don't like, like smelly or extremely ugly people,, but that'…
/r/MensRights13/10/17 08:39 PM
1

Just google haiti 2010 causalities or something similar. The first hit was a Wikipedia article then there were several articles by the main stream media like the BBC. When they talk about the death toll they concentrate on the earthquakes themselves, very little about the deaths afterwards. But there must have been those, of course, perhaps even thousands. But did somebody die of hunger, that's another question. As I said, it's not out of question - particularly among the most vulnerable, like t…
/r/MensRights13/10/17 08:10 PM
1

OK, but it's like any other public article you can read here.
/r/MensRights13/10/17 05:04 PM
2

The articles on the catastrophe I read seem to imply that almost all got killed during the earthquakes, not afterwards. None of the article mentioned causalities caused by food shortage. But, as I said, It's possible, perhaps even likely, that there were certain extra vulnerable people who couldn't get enough food and starved to death.
/r/MensRights13/10/17 12:56 PM
1

But is it true? It's a feminist talking, after all, and believing a feminist in this context is like believing a Nazi talking about Jews. (By the way, there is no reason to hide the name of the author.)
/r/MensRights13/10/17 12:45 PM
3

It would be interesting to know if there actually were any men - or people in general - who starved to death because of the policy or otherwise. I didn't manage to find a single person by quickly googling, but it's not impossible that somebody got killed because he or she just couldn't get any food from anybody, I guess.
/r/MensRights13/10/17 09:35 AM
1

People haven't been in control ever, not men nor women (though some progress has happened during the last few centuries in some parts of the world). I don't know why the great depression would be something special in the big picture of war, famine, disease, or other strokes of fate that could put you in poverty, slavery, or grave.
/r/MensRights13/10/17 08:46 AM
1

It's not about your feelings.
/r/MensRights12/10/17 08:08 AM
1

Women self-report greater happiness almost everywhere, though the gap has been shrinking (probably because they work more and in more demanding jobs than earlier and that has made their lives more stressful).
/r/MensRights12/10/17 08:07 AM
4

Women are better off, but not because of feminists. They are just the spearhead of the tendencies of a non-traditional, democratic society free of traditions. These tendencies are based on biology and aren't going anywhere, particularly because people don't even know about them and discussing them is, more or less, a taboo.
/r/MensRights11/10/17 06:26 PM
2

Are talking to the author of the article?
/r/MensRights11/10/17 03:36 PM
20

All girls get executed there?! That's awful. You should write about it to somebody, like the Guardian or the general secretary of the UN.
/r/MensRights11/10/17 11:46 AM
1

Only people who are in power can do these kinds of sexist (or racist) things. Think Nazis vs. Jews, the KKK vs. blacks, Arab elite vs. Arab women etc. EDIT: the KKK isn't a great example. Whom I meant were the white people who (in the southern USA, for example) could tell where the black people weren't allowed to go.
/r/MensRights11/10/17 11:14 AM
17

25th December. But only if the mother's name is Mary.
/r/MensRights11/10/17 10:10 AM
1

As if women spent 90% and men 10% of all money that is used to buy clothes! But I read somewhere that it's more like 80% and 20%.
/r/MensRights10/10/17 12:04 PM
6

Mr/Sir/Boy/Overlord
/r/MensRights10/10/17 11:58 AM
1

Carl Benjamin is fighting windmills because we can't - and actually don't want to - get rid of categories, even identity categories. Thomas Smith is wrong because he doesn't understand that fighting windmills can be a worthy cause, if we can, by doing it, change the way they look and prevent them from taking up all space.
/r/MensRights10/10/17 07:07 AM
3

If it's about your livelihood, reputation, future, life, it's pretty unfair to propose that you have to take a risk that you don't feel comfortable with.
/r/MensRights09/10/17 05:06 PM
9

Surely there have been a lot of feminists protesting?
/r/MensRights09/10/17 04:20 PM
15

One way to encourage these relationships is to have more people at the top of companies who are not straight white men. Yet another excuse to discriminate against straight white men. "Some women might suffer, let's hurt white men!"
/r/MensRights09/10/17 02:51 PM
1

Don't do it.
/r/MensRights02/10/17 07:33 AM
2

Where it's advancing at the moment is (cellphone) user interfaces, health, diagnoses, and traffic. But if you're thinking about human like communication, sex, yeah, but fooling people on the net is already here (computers writing reviews, for example) and it will be big business in a few years.
/r/MensRights02/10/17 07:29 AM
0

Raping is wrong but if you don't remember the rape, nothing about it, and there's nothing that even makes you have doubts afterwards, it won't have any effect on your well-being.
/r/MensRights02/10/17 07:09 AM
-6

I was just answering a question (I have no idea how people think they can possibly justify this one.). https://www.livescience.com/32963-why-dont-we-remember-being-babies.html I knew that I would be downvoted by people who get triggered easily but who cares. I'm not here or anywhere to please stupidos. If I thought that children under three should be abused, I wouldn't be writing about it, would I? Only psychopaths abuse children.
/r/MensRights02/10/17 07:02 AM
-26

We don't remember anything till we're about three years old?
/r/MensRights01/10/17 07:24 PM
4

That makes them look male. Are you sure it's the best way?
/r/MensRights01/10/17 06:42 AM
2

Yeah, I agree, it can.
/r/MensRights30/09/17 11:26 AM
8

How do you know they are useless? Most, if not all, degrees increase your chance of getting a well-paid job. All big universities publish surveys on these things.
/r/MensRights30/09/17 11:19 AM
1

Nope, we had a civil war in 1918, 21 years before the Winter War. It was a world-class humanitarian disaster. I don't pretend to know anything about what's really going on in Syria or Iraq, nor do I think I have any qualifications to judge any individual. I'm just talking about a general principle: if everybody flees, who will fight the bad guys? When I was about 12, I ended up in a bad school where there were three boys in my class terrorizing certain other boys. I challenged one of those assho…
/r/MensRights30/09/17 11:02 AM
1

Probably the "good father theme" worked in the goofy ads, increased sales, and they decided to test how far it would fly. Perhaps there's a change in the air. Fathers pictured as caring and good?
/r/MensRights30/09/17 10:33 AM
1

We had a civil war in 1918 in a country that was pretty much one of the third-world countries of Europe. Lots of injustices, lots of innocent casualties. But nowadays Finland has been "the least failed (fragile) state" year after year. It doesn't always end in a disaster. And, of course, I'm not judging here who has the right to flee and who should fight. Just saying that if everyone who feels threatened flees there is no-one to fight the bad guys. It's like a fact.
/r/MensRights30/09/17 10:17 AM
1

Saw it on TV last night and thought it's pretty depressing and strange for an ad. But perhaps it's just me - or perhaps they want to be strange and depressing. And it's not stranger than these, by the same telecom company. Before this lates one, there was a series of father-themed ads, here's the latest one. Probably they found out that fathers of teenagers are a group that favors other firms.
/r/MensRights30/09/17 07:43 AM
1

It's not a silly joke ... it's sick.
/r/MensRights30/09/17 07:05 AM
1

The big picture is that you can also stand up for your rights, not just flee. And this goes for everyone in all unjust situations, like, say, in a a school class or a works place. Or a country. If you don't, the bad guys will win always.
/r/MensRights30/09/17 06:14 AM
3

Exactly - but only in theory because it's truly difficult to know the maturity level of anyone the kids and their parents feel it's intrusive if the authorities conduct tests all the time to find out who's developed and who's immature, who's this or that by nature besides, it's expensive - and if not, there are doubts of validity - and most schools are struggling with money issues already. The only solution is to use methods that feel natural, like the age or gender. Now we use only the other on…
/r/MensRights30/09/17 05:59 AM
1

If there's hope there's will, if there's will there's a way. Germany isn't perhaps the best example, though. I just mentioned it because you did. But there are people who have risen, fought against the odds, shown bravery and .... mostly lost ... but even won.
/r/MensRights29/09/17 10:23 PM
1

Germany looked like Syria in 1945. Twenty years later men from Britain, for heaven's sake, "fled" to work there because the salaries were better. Don't jump to conclusions. Look what your grandparents did, when the country was in ruins.
/r/MensRights29/09/17 09:49 PM
6

I have to remember this! They aren't exactly the same men, though. Some men just are attractive and they use their attractiveness to get laid, so to, speak, without even trying all that much. It's not an essential part of their life or goals, just something that is available. But both groups of men create the same negative attitude among teen girls - that gives rise to feminism. As seen in the picture above.
/r/MensRights29/09/17 08:42 PM
3

How can you know that? Are you thinking that the law of entropy is inevitable (meaning that the universe will end in a state of immobility preventing life) as well as everything else)? Perhaps it is, perhaps it's not.
/r/MensRights29/09/17 07:57 PM
4

There was more to it (as you probably know). Families sent young men to Europe because it's their duty to earn and they couldn't over there (Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan ...). And because the prices of the traffickers went down. And it would have been too dangerous for women (at least, that's what people tend to think) and children. And families sent men - as well as men fled themselves - because there was the danger of having to fight for something you, or your family, didn't believe in. In other w…
/r/MensRights29/09/17 07:55 PM
19

"Men" aren't likely to cheat. The men women lust for are likely to cheat and they are just something like 10-20 % of all men (and not even all of them). There's a very sound sounding theory that feminism stems from this misunderstanding. If girls were told about their sexual preferences they wouldn't start hating or despising men
/r/MensRights29/09/17 05:47 PM
3

First humans to live forever (by 2045 as Kurzweil predicted) will be rich men and their closest family. But will they be white or of some shiny metallic color is still unclear.
/r/MensRights29/09/17 05:37 PM
9

Feminists talk about STEM because they are the fields where the big money is made. They think that if only women studied STEM more women would be among the billionaires and option millionaires. And that, they believe, would balance the power imbalance they have invented and is the foundation of the ideology. That's delusional because most people live in a altogether different world than the zuckerbergs. And there the money flows in a very different way: men make most of it, women spend most of i…
/r/MensRights29/09/17 05:23 PM
4

The problem starts in kindergarten because girls develop faster than boys till the age of 15 (on average). If it was the other way around we would have a educations system that took care of the problem somehow. Now it's not only taken care of but boys get discriminated against in many ways.
/r/MensRights29/09/17 05:12 PM
1

Then again, "never hit a women" was an absolute moral rule back then. Another one was and still is: "if somebody acts like mentally ill, you can feel - or at least try to feel - sorry for her instead of being angry". Nobody handled the situation well, but ... it's difficult.
/r/MensRights29/09/17 04:01 PM
1

It's a typical young feminist in search of an enemy she can hate.
/r/MensRights29/09/17 01:40 PM
3

When I was younger, so much young that today, I worked at a meat processing plant. Pretty soon after I had started, I ended up in an elevator with a few women whom I didn't know. One of them, perhaps in her 50s, got next to me and grabbed me by my dick. I pushed her away and I still can remember how she laughed: a bit triumphant, a bit crazy. The other women just looked the other way. I mentioned about it to my boss. He said that the woman had done that before, many times - as I later on learned…
/r/MensRights29/09/17 08:17 AM
8

If a retail chain that's targeting women has the guts to be sexist, does that mean that women are sexist? Or at least favoring women over men? I'm pretty sure that it doesn't work the other way around for men. If so, does that mean that men aren't sexist? Or are they just afraid of women's reactions?
/r/MensRights29/09/17 07:45 AM
2

Up here in Finland we have social security for that. But now the government has started a basic income experiment. The idea is to lower the threshold to work even in low-paying jobs (or self-employ) and cut the bureaucracy and thus costs of the social security system (I'm pretty pessimistic that the experiment is actually able to prove it either way because it's so badly conducted but that's another story). Basic income itself seems to be a good idea that's very hard to sell.
/r/MensRights29/09/17 07:19 AM
1

That would work for small businesses, but startups tend to be leaps of hope, all-in kinds of games. How willing you are to take risks or how much you enjoy the stress that comes along depends partly on hormone levels (perhaps even the brains structure) and there isn't much much you can do about it. Most men can't handle that either.
/r/MensRights29/09/17 06:45 AM
7

This young pretty lady followed a script where she spots a man older than herself, approaches smiling, asks questions and then praises me for right answers. The questions were all about girls, nothing about boys. But when she realized that I wasn't following the script she recovered herself quickly and said that they also helps boys. I said that I can't really be sure if that's true given what I knew about their approach - though she had been told to say so. (It was interesting that she spoke En…
/r/MensRights28/09/17 04:08 PM
2

This message must have come from an alien civilization where women are worse-off, consume less. use less economic power than men, are not the majority of the electorate, are not working outside homes and so forth. Must be a grim place
/r/MensRights28/09/17 06:40 AM
15

Sexism against men is one of the mechanism that is driving more and more men into the marginal. "Sorry, but we don't give (white) male students stipends, we don't recruit (white) men at the moment etc". And then when the marginalization, boys or men not studying or working increases, these people don't know what to think. "Why are the most privileged people in the whole world doing so worse than those they oppress?! Must be their stupidity."
/r/MensRights28/09/17 06:25 AM
5

Most women who make false accusations - or accusations, in general - regret the next morning something they did while drunk, told the police department of Helsinki, Finland. And all men should understand that this isn't even rare nowadays. Drunken sex is a big risk. Perhaps these women think that it was the booze that tricked them to do something they really didn't want to do. And, in a way, it was. But, then again, you can't say that beer made you drive a car recklessly and kill that person.
/r/MensRights28/09/17 05:33 AM
15

The reason to support the MRA and be against feminism is to support equality. Feminism means, more often than not, giving more benefits to the sex that already is better off. So, it's widening the equality gap (in a period that threatens men even without feminists). There should be a strong movement to counterbalance the enormous power the feminists are given by the "patriarchal society".
/r/MensRights28/09/17 04:07 AM
5

Perhaps the most important task of any judicial system is to punish the guilty and thus restore - symbolically - the "moral" balance of the society when something wrong happens to a member of the society. If the monopoly of legal violence fails to punish the wrong-doer, with the severity that is seen fit by the legislation, the balance is not restored. And this can - will - lead to the erosion of legitimacy, not only of the judicial system but the state that holds the monopoly of legal violence,…
/r/MensRights27/09/17 04:13 PM
3

And men are more likely to take risks. It's a scientific fact. And a fine thing, too. We need people who are ready to take risks.
/r/MensRights27/09/17 12:58 PM
3

Why did they name their prize after an idiot? Darwin was, after all, a man.
/r/MensRights27/09/17 12:55 PM
2

It's pretty much the other way around. Men's role is much tighter and we are expected to provide for the family. But perhaps the poster is talking about an alternative reality?
/r/MensRights27/09/17 04:07 AM
4

And then there are those who know and won't participate in discussion. Censorship works!
/r/MensRights26/09/17 06:59 PM
3

But that's not the point. Teachers and fucking pupils shouldn't go together.
/r/MensRights26/09/17 06:46 PM
3

Yeah, that is the question that made me post this in the first place. Perhaps there's an decent explanation ... or she just got the pussy pass.
/r/MensRights26/09/17 12:47 PM
32

If she was poor or a man - or very ugly?
/r/MensRights26/09/17 11:44 AM
1

Put a space after the punctuation mark. A friendly advice from a former journalist.
/r/MensRights26/09/17 07:38 AM
15

A useful idiot.
/r/MensRights26/09/17 07:06 AM
2

The court heard Woodward had become addicted to drugs while in an abusive relationship with a previous boyfriend. "It was a man's fault!"
/r/MensRights26/09/17 04:34 AM
1

He has a point but I wouldn't work for him.
/r/MensRights26/09/17 04:26 AM
1

Brexit in two years.
/r/MensRights25/09/17 07:54 PM
4

Clinical, major depression is a disorder that makes you - often lie in your bed and feel gloomy. Some depressed people don't even get up to go to the toilet. That kind of depression, that gets diagnosed, is more common among women.
/r/MensRights25/09/17 02:43 PM
1

I'm pretty sure I fixed it the first time ... but, yeah, it was still wrong. I even changed the text (by leaving "clips" out) but that didn't update either. Strange.
/r/MensRights25/09/17 11:25 AM
1

Thanks, now the links should be right.
/r/MensRights25/09/17 10:10 AM
1

Perhaps you should check out what was the subject that we were supposed to discuss. It reads in the title ( Tips on telling people who do think it is real?)
/r/MensRights25/09/17 07:11 AM
7

A Swedish TV documentary about crazy and dangerous feminists. A Norwegian TV series about the nature/nurture debate often showing the craziness of feminists. Both have English subtitles.
/r/MensRights25/09/17 06:32 AM
-1

Well, if that's so, then the OP have found the answer to his question!. ;)
/r/MensRights24/09/17 07:01 PM
-1

That's a good start. But what does "proven" mean. Anyways, if somebody thinks that women are paid less unfairly, because of discrimination, there's clearly a mystery: why don't the firms that employ women and can thus produce cheaper goods squash the firms that pay more in wages because they discriminate against women and employ men with higher salaries?
/r/MensRights24/09/17 06:48 PM
2

Sometimes women are victims, sometimes men. Sometimes weak people, sometimes poor. Sometimes ...
/r/MensRights24/09/17 06:13 PM
-1

How do you know yourself it's not real?
/r/MensRights24/09/17 06:07 PM
2

Nice work. Perhaps Twitter will teach feminists not to lie, in other words tell about their worldview, in public but just by themselves (like in mainstream media and political parties and the government).
/r/MensRights24/09/17 05:03 PM
2

Did I just read something brilliant? To find out, I should read it again and ... I think not. Forwards!
/r/MensRights24/09/17 04:42 PM
15

The feminist views and lies are truly in the core of the power structures.
/r/MensRights24/09/17 08:56 AM
8

Feminists would ask the captain of the sinking ship to form a committee with two tasks: 1) order positive discrimination for women because of ancient injustices and 2) order armed men to see to it that the women are favored. Of course the ship would sink taking everybody to their graves while the captain and the committee were discussing whether the transgendered could be considered female.
/r/MensRights24/09/17 08:25 AM
7

Many black men in the USA, trying to be good, identify with their (single) mothers rather than their fathers. That's because their fathers are often in prison, dead, or have left, or are criminals (because the job market discriminates heavily against black men). The whole situation can lead to a very sexist, feminist-like worldview. Or am I completely wrong?
/r/MensRights24/09/17 07:12 AM
3

Masculinity is not "born out of the era of colonialism and intertwined with other systems of oppression such as notions of capitalism" but something that is based on mostly innate hormone levels and physical and brain structures, and interactions with women which repeat themselves through cultures and ages essentially the same way. Do we need to abolish feminism, would be a far better question. But that question could never be asked in a public forum like that. Why? Because men have created a ci…
/r/MensRights24/09/17 06:55 AM
0

Yes, but you really can't measure productivity outside the markets. I know that there are ways to do exactly that (Taylorism, for example) but if the output doesn't sell you weren't productive in reality, just within the "imaginary" productivity system. So, in a bigger picture, productive people aren't productive if they don't create value (though this can be argued against, it still explains wages very well).
/r/MensRights23/09/17 03:08 PM
2

Feminist group admits 'pay gap' is caused by women's choices No they didn't. They just chose a smaller percentage for some reason.
/r/MensRights23/09/17 02:17 PM
49

Earnings are not determined by how important work people do, neither are they determined by how much work is put into manufacturing something (like Marx thought). We earn (on average) according to our productivity (which is determined on the job market, not by calculations or individual or even cultural values).
/r/MensRights23/09/17 02:11 PM
2

In Finland, AFAIK, a university is not allowed to do anything unless the aggressive behavior (like rape, though I didn't manage to find a single case by googling) took place at the university. Then the aggressor can be suspended or fired. And "campuses" are not part of the universities, which are solely institutions for studying and researching. Everything else takes place within the normal legal system. If an alleged victim is afraid of the rapist she can try to get a restraining order from the…
/r/MensRights23/09/17 07:14 AM
1

A clickbait headline, clearly. Though the lady in question doesn't sound perfectly sane either.
/r/MensRights22/09/17 04:02 PM
0

It's not unreasonable, taking into account that they are supposed to be public spaces financed by everybody's tax money. The fair thing to do would be to have at least a few parks for bitches in heat and/or signs in front of those parks which don't allow them in. Apparently the city has already promised to do something along those lines.
/r/MensRights22/09/17 02:54 PM
5

If somebody kills himself he's usually mentally unstable. But sometimes there's rational thinking behind the decision (like when you're in pain and going to be dead soon anyway).
/r/MensRights22/09/17 02:31 PM
3

"We were yelling for help. We didn't know what the emergency number was … a man came over with his jacket and tried to beat the flame out." Well, they were no family court lawyers then.
/r/MensRights22/09/17 02:27 PM
21

The reason is that you, feminists, need an enemy. And in the tradition of the hate movements, you want to describe that enemy not worthy of respect. The popular bad guy has been for ages on TV and the like a guy who's filthy rich and powerful but doesn't deserve the status and treats everybody bad and below himself.
/r/MensRights22/09/17 01:58 PM
3

We know, too, that women's interest both in STEM and politics correlates with how well-off they are. But what does it mean? One explanation could be that, if they think that they have to work hard to get a better careers, earnings, life they'll get interested in STEM. And, if they want the system to favor them even more, they have to know how the world works. or at least it makes them more interested in it. But at some point, all the trouble starts to look like too much, when you can get a happy…
/r/MensRights22/09/17 08:42 AM
6

The surveys were compared against the WEF's Gender gap index, which is a feminist "study" and doesn't measure the gender gap but women's well-being. So, the countries that "have done the most to promote equality", according to the index, have actually done the most to promote women's well-being (we don't know if these are actually the same countries because no attempt to compare the gender gap honestly has been conducted, but it seems clear that they are not).
/r/MensRights22/09/17 07:09 AM
1

Many young men don't like it that they aren't 1§considered fit enough to even if they are at the same glad that they don't have to spend 6-12 months doing something they really don't like to do.
/r/MensRights22/09/17 03:58 AM
2

So that the UN don't get all the clicks for their ads ... oookeyh, sounds clever.
/r/MensRights21/09/17 02:50 PM
2

The Geek Feminism Anti-Abuse Team will not act on complaints regarding: ‘Reverse’ -isms, including ‘reverse racism,’ ‘reverse sexism,’ and ‘cisphobia’ (because these things don’t ex ist) Criticizing racist, sexist, cissexist, or otherwise oppressive behavior or assumptions They don't know what they want - or can't put it in words because they are buried so deep in feminist bullshit language.
/r/MensRights21/09/17 11:51 AM
1

Seems that they did if for money (from GoFundMe) and - probably - just picked the kid they liked the least or hated the most. It could not be the daughter but the twin brother was very lucky.
/r/MensRights21/09/17 11:40 AM
15

Stating facts is not an attempt to rewrite history. Finland fought alone against Stalin once and once along with Germany (not de jure but de facto). And then alone against Germany in northern Finland. And Stalin was without a question a dictator and mass murderer. The USA never declared war against Finland but helped massively Stalin and the Soviet troops. Finland stayed independent and democratic unlike any other neighbor of Russia (the Soviet Union).
/r/MensRights21/09/17 10:44 AM
8

Finland was among the first countries to ratify it while it's clearly sexists and feminist declaration.
/r/MensRights21/09/17 09:41 AM
6

Norway. And Sweden will introduce it next year.
/r/MensRights21/09/17 09:39 AM
14

Yeah, Finns fought two evil dictators and mass murderers and stayed independent unlike any other neighbor of Russia - while the western allies just fought one and helped the other one. Many ignorant or immoral people think that the allies were morally superior. LOL. But your ignorance is totally irrelevant to the question at hand.
/r/MensRights21/09/17 09:35 AM
4

Being drunk lowers inhibitions and bring forth something in your psyche that is always there but is controlled.
/r/MensRights21/09/17 05:34 AM
25

It seems that women, who are volunteers and can even quit the military without sanctions, are not going to take part in the lessons. And women are according to most studies the more violent party in relationships. And the share of women who are afraid of domestic violence is well under one per cent. I can imagine myself in a situation like that: first being forced to serve and then told that you shouldn't hit your female partners. "What the fuck, do they really think I don't know that?!" "Should…
/r/MensRights21/09/17 04:55 AM
3

In Finland teachers get paid well and are well respected. Nevertheless male teachers are rare. How do you explain that?
/r/MensRights20/09/17 04:44 PM
4

The picture you are painting is much too dark - otherwise I agree that in certain failed Muslim countries it's hard to to be a woman. But not in Tunis, for example. In Iran women have in many ways more power than men when it comes to private life. But what I was commenting on was the strange idea that women are property in Muslim countries. Or were in the west in the past. That's simply not true. Women have had stronger or weaker legal status, but in no successful culture since ages women haven'…
/r/MensRights20/09/17 04:32 PM
3

Where do these property memes come from? "Earlier women were the property of men", "in Islamic countries women are the property of men". Crazy feminist bullshit.
/r/MensRights20/09/17 03:02 PM
10

I must have tried to have sex with hundreds of women when I was younger and not married. Where were all those angelic women back then? I mean, my success rate was something like one in thirty or less. Even women who I got to the bed sometimes refused to give sex even when they were very happy to receive it (you know what I mean). Most women don't have absolutely no idea of how dating and sex works from the viewpoint of those who have to do most of the work. But this was in the 80s. So, perhaps I…
/r/MensRights20/09/17 02:47 PM
2

I'm not going to take part in your childish shaming game. Never discuss anything with a feminist or other haters, that's been my conviction for over ten years now. So, sorry to say: you're banned. ;)
/r/MensRights20/09/17 12:48 PM
3

I know studies, you don't. That's the big difference between you and me, us and you guys. I'm a big fan of the enlightenment, you're a big fan of ignorance. Wake up!
/r/MensRights20/09/17 12:28 PM
4

Many male reporters have a gynocentric bias. The political agenda of most mainstream media outlets stress already "women's issues" (like wage gap, child care problems. parent leaves etc). The problems that are typical to men are almost never discussed at least as men's issues (like education gap, health gap, unemployment of the less educated etc). And I haven't noticed any big difference between male and female reporters in this respect. So, what they are after is perhaps some kind of a gynocent…
/r/MensRights20/09/17 12:05 PM
1

And yet there was a tradition of democracy in Europe, starting from ancient Athens and continuing to prehistoric tribes, many towns, local decision making and so forth.
/r/MensRights20/09/17 07:20 AM
5

That's impossible. Most people instinctively like women more than men. Most people have a loving mother whom they love more than anything else. Most men want to please women in order to be liked and perhaps even to have sex. Men, on the other hand, are a threat, for men as competitors and for women as predators. This is not going to change as long as we are men and women with out different biological features.
/r/MensRights20/09/17 06:24 AM
5

Women in Muslim countries have legal privileges, too, even more than in the first world countries. Yeah, that's not the whole picture but it's important to understand that women have had privileges in all successful cultures.
/r/MensRights20/09/17 06:16 AM
2

A daughter of good friends of mine began a relationship with a 22 year old man when she was 14. After waiting till the girl got 18 they got married and had a daughter. The parents didn't like the relationship at first, who would?, but now they seem to get along with the husband just fine. I, on the other hand, can't have a relaxed relationship with the guy. He's nice and all but it's just too weird. Though I know that 14 year old girls marrying much older men was almost a norm not so long ago.
/r/MensRights20/09/17 06:05 AM
10

Yeah, that's so true.
/r/MensRights20/09/17 05:46 AM
10

This in a nutshell is how screwed up our system is
/r/MensRights20/09/17 05:45 AM
35

In Europe peeing in public is a folk tradition, not a crime, unless you do it in plain sight when it's worth a fine if even that. Americans are strange.
/r/MensRights19/09/17 06:19 PM
2

It's a big victory for feminists.
/r/MensRights19/09/17 11:59 AM
6

Another possible explanation is that it's due to rape/sexual assault they suffer in the armed services. Probably a mix of things, but this shouldn't be discounted. Or Devil worshipers - or did that go out of fashion already? In that case my guess is experiments by aliens. Have anyone checked out how many of the women serviced in the area 51 - or 52 even!?
/r/MensRights19/09/17 07:52 AM
1

A fairly good click bait. But, let's face it, nothing about the post is true.
/r/MensRights19/09/17 05:09 AM
2

Yeah, they did that too.
/r/MensRights19/09/17 04:29 AM
228

But did Sabrina Erdely learn anything? Does she still trust the feminist bullshit the way she used to?
/r/MensRights18/09/17 03:37 PM
3

Feminists aren't Marxists, only a minority is. Mostly they are just confused.
/r/MensRights18/09/17 08:11 AM
8

I got banned because of asking something like: "Why do people think that women are worse off when they are better off according to almost all statistics measuring the quality of life". I even cited several statistics. The question was against their "be nice" policy. LOL.
/r/MensRights18/09/17 08:08 AM
1

The fear women have leads to false accusations. When women have only hazy memories of what happened, after a night at the bar, they'll gravitate towards "feminist interpretations" nowadays more than earlier. The risk of getting caught in this surreal, Kafkan, trap of having to prove that you did not rape is small, but it's there and can ruin your life.
/r/MensRights18/09/17 08:02 AM
1

Of course it will be clear that all women are not vile creatures, false accusers are. There is s very vast grey area where women aren't sure whether they have been raped or not. The police in my town said that even something like 60% of accusations don't lead to anything because nothing criminal had happened or the accuser backed down. The only somewhat sure way to avoid these traps is not to have sex. The next best way is not to have sex with drunken women. And if you do, record the conversatio…
/r/MensRights18/09/17 07:49 AM
0

This comment could be relevant in this context or not. The article itself admits, sort of, that the title of the article is not correct.
/r/MensRights18/09/17 07:39 AM
15

My son said that he'd like to be a teacher. I said: go for it, but remember that you're likely to be discriminated against and that you have to compete against those girls whom the education system has been favoring all along (teachers favoring girls was a common theme my son and his friends talked about at one point). Now he's studying programming. One of his dreams is still to become a teacher. Unfortunately, programming is not taught in schools as a separate schools subject - probably because…
/r/MensRights18/09/17 07:35 AM
17

Could this all have been done in an attempt to hide that the individual that Equifax put in charge of protecting 143 million American’s credit information was an affirmative action hire meant to meet some quota? That still remains to be seen, And the title was: Equifax Chief Information Security Officer Was An Affirmative Action Hire Hmm, I don't trust liars all that much.
/r/MensRights18/09/17 06:53 AM
13

Actually they killed women, too, in their rampages but they especially targeted boys and men who were studying in "western" (non-Islamic) schools. The biggest double standard, tragedy, or what ever you want to call it, later on was that many mainstream media outlets lied that the "world" (read: the mainstream media, politicians, help organizations) didn't care because the kidnapped were girls when the facts proved, of course, the exact opposite. When they were killing males, it went pretty much …
/r/MensRights18/09/17 06:39 AM
1

Just make it a lesbian show so that you don't have to have men messing up everything.
/r/MensRights18/09/17 04:53 AM
4

Women and men aren't two antagonistic classes. It's just a narrative to say they are.
/r/MensRights17/09/17 06:51 PM
6

Nah, insanity is no problem for feminists. In fact, most of their dogmas are insane, more or less.
/r/MensRights17/09/17 04:51 PM
4

If they had consulted Feminists, they would have been told that it's the white cis men they really want to discriminate against. Only they always earn more than everybody else. Now Feminists should be starting a boycott against the firm, because now a homosexual Muslim dressing up as a cat might have to pay more just because of hiers genitals. But, to be frank, this intersectionality it's just one of Feminist lies. When push comes to shove there'll be just men and women in their ideology, and it…
/r/MensRights31/05/17 02:55 PM
44

So, a 50 year old surgeon earning $500 000 a month will get an insurance cheaper than, say, $1 000 earning garbage man, if she just can prove she has a vagina. Sounds absolutely reasonable. :D I would never have any customer relationship with a firm that stupid and unfair. But, hey it's their business if the local law doesn't forbid it. Besides it will get more expensive for the men compared to a fair system, that is, not only compared to the unfair system. That's because somebody must pay for t…
/r/MensRights31/05/17 02:32 PM
-4

Hard to say because we just have one side of the story via a news reporter.
/r/MensRights31/05/17 01:44 PM
1

I think she's trying to come up with a way to use quantum physics in a feminist way, because now it's obviously used in a patriarchal way. That was sarcasm. For these people reality is totally or in some crucial ways social. So are physics, not perhaps totally but regarding what gets invented and how it's explained and used.
/r/MensRights31/05/17 11:14 AM
4

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sokal_affair
/r/MensRights31/05/17 11:04 AM
36

We can't know. But the girl who, apparently, is in the recording is not referred as his girlfriend which makes me think that it was something that happened once and boiled over because the poor boy did something wrong and then the school and police overreacted. Of course it's possible that the girl played a part in it, too. Perhaps they did a "sex tape" together, perhaps the girl indeed, sent him "pornographic" sound material.
/r/MensRights31/05/17 07:41 AM
-27

I'm used to it. :D People with too strong agendas or feelings can't always think straight.
/r/MensRights31/05/17 07:33 AM
5

Send her pictures of female MRAs and ask which do you think is more likely all these women are organized misogynists, rape apologists and proponents of violence against women or perhaps mothers who are concerned of their sons futures in a society that lets boys fall behind in education and so on (you could add here a few problems men have that are sensitive questions to you friend) and also woman who have looked behind the curtain of hate and false propaganda that surrounds MRAs and found out th…
/r/MensRights31/05/17 07:21 AM
1

It was an audio recording according to the lawyer of the family. And it's the same guy tells the whole story claiming for example that audio files can't be child pornography and that the poor kid was accused of that.
/r/MensRights31/05/17 06:51 AM
-50

He probably did something wrong - like perhaps recording a sex act and then playing it to others. In the article the one person who says he didn't do anything wrong is the family's attorney, but that's his job.
/r/MensRights31/05/17 06:41 AM
49

It was an audio file (according to the attorney). Probably he recorded sex and then played it to somebody who then told a teacher. But this is speculation.
/r/MensRights31/05/17 06:34 AM
1

The impossible, oft-repeated advice that women should “be sexy, but no too sexy” rings in the ears like an alarm when presented with media narratives of young women at the mercy of their own poor decisions. Centuries of mythology from the Greeks to the Christian bible and Qur’an insist that beautiful women are a trick to lure men to ruination, and you don’t need to go as far as an MRA Reddit thread to understand how deeply these myths maintain their psychocultural hold on so many. How satisfying…
/r/MensRights30/05/17 07:22 PM
-15

I don't know if this story is true or not. Anyway, when I filmed our sons I always interacted with them so that there could be no misunderstandings. If you want to film children without interacting, well, don't? Or have a woman with you. It's not fair but that's the way it is.
/r/MensRights30/05/17 06:53 PM
7

One of the rules of every decent Internet's discussion forum since ages has been not to be rude and not to complain about the language. skills of foreign speakers. You could have said: I had hard time understanding the language you wrote so perhaps you could consider studying it a bit more. But then again you had no problems understanding because the OP knows Englis enough to get her message through perfectly.
/r/MensRights30/05/17 06:23 PM
1

And because feminism has a monopoly on the social narrative That's an exaggeration in my opinion. Feminist may have a near monopoly on the gender discourse in many or most media outlets and certain parts of the academia. Perhaps in some other institutions like the education sector in general. But john and jane does are a different story. Most of them either are indifferent (but not feminist because of that) or laugh at feminists. More and more of the middle-aged men are starting to get angry whi…
/r/MensRights30/05/17 06:07 PM
4

I'm no expert but the number of male narcissists must be exaggerated because men are put in prisons much more often and for longer times than women and diagnoses are done there or on the way there. At least that's the case with psychopaths.
/r/MensRights30/05/17 04:20 PM
3

If, for example, you promised to dramatically reduce male suicide, or pledged to close the education gap for sons of voters up and down the country, don’t you think either of those might be a vote winner? This is a good question. Why almost nobody ever speaks for the worse-off sex? There must be very strong reasons.
/r/MensRights30/05/17 03:43 PM
12

Perhaps the fathers got removed from the lives of their children?
/r/MensRights30/05/17 01:41 PM
11

Women run these things because they are not satisfied with the result if thy don't. This is also pretty much one of the important reasons why people seek to positions where they can use power. Of course, in many families things are shared more equally.
/r/MensRights30/05/17 11:03 AM
2

Ah, sorry then. The declining GDPs have indeed affected men more than women, at least in Finland employmentwise So, you could argue that women's relative position even in this sense has been improving.
/r/MensRights30/05/17 10:13 AM
2

It's almost like a meme here that the school system is both excellent and equal. And you could argue it is because 1) Your family's social status or the area where you live determines your PISA results less than in almost in any other country (which in my opinion has more to do with things other than schools and I'm not even sure if that's true anymore). 2) And sure you can say that the PISA results are world class. But they always "forget" to say that Finland is among the worst regarding the ge…
/r/MensRights30/05/17 10:04 AM
2

my daughter tells me that high school is just obviously sexist against boys and she thinks of this as something that "everyone knows". My son here in Finland said exact the same thing - and his friends around him were agreeing. It was mostly about girls and teachers, who are naturally almost always women, having more friendly relations. From that grew suspicions - or knowledge - that many teachers favored girls. Those comments really made me wonder what's going on. I Googled for a few hours and …
/r/MensRights30/05/17 06:27 AM
1

A minor point: there are a lot of countries where things were better 10 years ago. The GDP of most Euro countries is lower than 10 years ago. The same goes for many other countries in Europe (Russia and Ukraine included) and South America. And elsewhere. And even in those poorer places where this is not the case and the GDP is higher the growth rates have been going down dramatically during the last ten years. In many Islam countries things have gone from bad to worse. And I could go on - but le…
/r/MensRights30/05/17 05:58 AM
1

Yes, I agree. For most medias it's about keeping women and particularly young women happy. You can't endanger the advertisement revenue by pissing women off. Men aren't that important and not as sensitive either. So publishing, for example, feminist rubbish isn't seen as a big problem - or wasn't seen. Lately the owners have apparently become more aware that the policies must change. I follow several publications and the aggressive attacks against men have in my opinion clearly gone down. Why? I…
/r/MensRights30/05/17 05:24 AM
5

Yeah, men favor women and like to give them privileges. And, yeah, it's not universal. History is full of examples of cultures where I really can't see how women could have been seen as the better-off sex, they are nowadays. If the culture, for example, demands that the feet of girls are bound so that they can't really walk ever again, women in that culture can't be seen as equal. But I'm pretty sure that democracies tend to move towards favoring women because it's based on a strong psychologica…
/r/MensRights29/05/17 11:06 AM
0

Western women are the flue that keeps the world trade and customer trade flowing. That's why all kinds of media outlets (like Reddit) that depend on advertising are afraid to look like they were anti-women.
/r/MensRights29/05/17 09:47 AM
3

I totally agree. Why media - -and academia - are so hopelessly feminist is a mystery to me. I've worked in both and what I know is that many people are afraid to fight feminists. Being anti-feminist turns easily - and falsely - being anti-women and being anti-women is a taboo. But I don't think that's the whole explanation.
/r/MensRights29/05/17 09:41 AM
3

I know that very well and tried to be not too optimistic (actually regarding equality I'm very pessimistic). But as I said, I really hope that the tide will turn for the sake of my children.
/r/MensRights29/05/17 09:36 AM
7

If you compare how much women earn, get paid in, say, a year, it's about 20% less than men. Even so, it's been estimated that women spend about 2 or three times more than men. But it's no mystery. They spend also money that's been earned by men either directly or through taxes.
/r/MensRights29/05/17 09:34 AM
8

And men have big problems to get to many female-dominated fields. Women are favored also in many male dominated jobs over men and particularly young men (which is one reason why Trump won). It's been studied, too, though not enough, of course. And I don't believe that women get abused more or much more. And it's an irrelevant problem to most people. And if by "abuse" is meant violence then certainly not. And though women earn less they spend many times more. How's that possible, feminists. I won…
/r/MensRights29/05/17 08:00 AM
12

Againstmensrights has 8,924, r/feminism has 68,848. The tide will eventually turn and also the media will see whats right and good and what's bad and false ... or that's what I hope.
/r/MensRights29/05/17 07:44 AM
1

Sorry to say but you sound like an annoying troll ... everybody should know that different people, for example, clean their houses differently. Some use a lot of time and have a clean house, some use no time and have a messy house. Furthermore every western country has statistics on the time use where you can check how much more single woman compared to single men spend time on chores in your country.
/r/MensRights29/05/17 03:25 AM
2

Yeah, women spend many times more on "tidying up" themselves, buying makeup, all kinds of lotions, shampoos and what not.
/r/MensRights28/05/17 06:48 PM
5

too vague, sorry
/r/MensRights28/05/17 04:55 PM
-1

It's been studied. Actually it's not that difficult to find out how many hours each people do chores. And, yes, you are wrong.
/r/MensRights28/05/17 02:47 PM
1

Men should keep out of jobs that demand working with women and children. There's going to be trouble sooner or later. But if they don't keep out, they should choose areas where being manly is a positive thing. This was an advice from a female nurse. She herself was at the time studying to become an urgent care nurse and said that there manliness is often a positive thing. I'm not saying she's right, just telling an anecdote.
/r/MensRights28/05/17 11:48 AM
3

Single women do more chores than single men on average. I'm pretty sure it's the same for many girls and boys. But why do women - and girls in likelihood - want their rooms cleaner and tidier? Is this trait a sign of discrimination or oppression or just something that comes more naturally to girls than to boys?
/r/MensRights28/05/17 10:53 AM
5

A feminist "fact". Never believe them.
/r/MensRights28/05/17 10:40 AM
3

I'm sure was often the case. My farther in the 60s long hours so that my mother didn't need to work at all outside the home. That's what he said afterwards. But in the late 70s it was over. I'm not sure why but then my father started to work less and my mother took a job as a receptionist.
/r/MensRights28/05/17 10:05 AM
7

Media is more and more in the hands of feminazis who couldn't care less what's true and fair. When they get to rewrite history it should look something like this: the Red Army faction (Baader-Meinhof) was a group of men who terrorized women and girls in the 1970s. The IRA consisted of all non-Muslim men in the world and they wanted nothing else than to kill women and girls. The first world war started when millions of white men threw a bomb at countess Sophie Chotek (and killed a man by accident…
/r/MensRights28/05/17 06:51 AM
1

You asked who cares. I do.
/r/MensRights27/05/17 08:49 PM
0

I mentioned it because it obviously hasn't been a big annoyance for the majority of Finnish men. After all, we have a long tradition of bathing together in saunas. But I can only imagine what it feels like if an Arabic man is naked and all of a sudden a young woman enters the premises. In other words, I think that Arabic an Islam men have the right for privacy and simple human kindness (aka human rights)
/r/MensRights27/05/17 07:52 PM
2

As I said earlier, I don't discuss with feminists. Could you honor this principle I have?
/r/MensRights27/05/17 05:33 PM
1

A friendly question: can you have many ideologies. After all, an ideology is supposed to be comprehensive, something that explains how the world works.
/r/MensRights27/05/17 05:19 PM
3

I'm definitely not talking about the most intelligent men but rather the opposite. A family man with one wife is the backbone of the western civilization. He's the one who makes things happen. Or used to be. But this is something that can't be resolved by a discussion or speculation. Only future can tell who was right. I firmly believe that I'm ... not utterly wrong.
/r/MensRights27/05/17 05:03 PM
2

Perhaps so, though I don't understand why men could earn as well as women if they are a similar risk to the employers and a have lower education level. But anyways, men, with a lower education and no family prospects ... it could be a catastrophe. My task in this life is to make people understand this. :D
/r/MensRights27/05/17 04:29 PM
4

One risk is that some men will start to earn less which might mean the end of the marriage for the not-so-well-off men. That again could mean a catastrophe.
/r/MensRights27/05/17 04:10 PM
35

The DV argument: "In relationships it's almost always men who are the perpetrators and women the victims. And that the violence is common. And that every man should be regarded as a potential perpetrator". I always thought it was unfair an in many ways a false argument. Then I did some research after discussing the meme with MRAs and found out that it's known since the 70s (at least) that women are about as violent than men in relationships (or perhaps more so). And still feminists kept claiming…
/r/MensRights27/05/17 03:41 PM
2

I think it's here, for example. Too lazy to go through the data but a few years ago I did. There's a lot interesting info about the attitudes and values people have.
/r/MensRights27/05/17 03:19 PM
1

You don't read answers you reply to, do you? I think that countries that ban abortions are shit holes as I said. You missed that because you don't read answers. I also said that it's ridiculous to compare a problems in Ireland and Saudi Arabia (and a few other shit holes) to a different problem that's threatening our civilization: boys getting more and more marginalized because of a discriminatory education system in all wealthy countries without almost nobody doing anything about. But, hey, if …
/r/MensRights27/05/17 03:16 PM
45

It's a pity that she doesn't give credit to MRAs. I'm a recovering feminist and think that it was the MRA discussions that made me see the truth, so to speak. At first I doubted because the arguments were so far from what I had bee told all my life. But then ... then I just couldn't find counter-arguments that made sense. The truth have this effect on people.
/r/MensRights27/05/17 03:02 PM
13

anti-male sentiment is becoming more structuralized. A bold statement that somebody should take seriously before it's too late.
/r/MensRights27/05/17 02:51 PM
6

This is known from other surveys since ages. But not "well-known" because it doesn't fit the narrative we should believe in.
/r/MensRights27/05/17 02:46 PM
3

We all know or should know that men tend to have less rights. Why? Read the OP's post for an example.
/r/MensRights27/05/17 02:35 PM
1

So, I can't say a country is a shit hole because they force women to illegal abortions - or abroad which is the solution in Ireland? Whatever. I suspect you're either very young or a feminist. The abortion problems surely aren't that important in any critical mind which tries to study the world objectively. Compared to the discrimination in schools, that is. If it were girls who got t discriminated against we wouldn't speak of much else.
/r/MensRights27/05/17 02:33 PM
1

I couldn't care less. The fact that the abortion is made difficult (probably by women because they tend to be against abortions much more than men) in countries like Saudi Arabia or Ireland compared to the fact that boys are heavily discriminated against in schools is almost nothing. The latter fact is endangering the civilization that has been built by dozens of generations of women and men. It's close to a miracle - which can't last if boys and men aren't given a leveled playground. Boys and m…
/r/MensRights27/05/17 02:02 PM
1

Study the issues you're talking about and they'll become much clearer. All I said can be found in objective studies (not in feminist bullshit). Sorry that you live in Saudi Arabia or some similar place where abortion is not legal. But I'm mostly talking about western countries because I live in one. That you can't see how big a problem the discrimination in schools is probably comes from you Saudi experiences?
/r/MensRights27/05/17 01:12 PM
1

Women think that dealing with people is a nice career choice while men and boys choose those areas that women don't like - because the education system discriminates against boys and their chances of getting to study things women are interested in are slim. Furthermore men and people, particularly children, is so problematic minefield that most boys just don't want to step into it. Unless nobody tells them about the minefield, naturally. In most service occupations men are less productive becaus…
/r/MensRights27/05/17 12:56 PM
1

Most women are just common people who want to have a nice life. They study what they think they'll enjoy and many will opt for a part time job - and here they differ from men - if they can get somebody else to pay for it. Check out a place like Norway. It's the wealthiest western country and more and more women are working part time.
/r/MensRights27/05/17 11:17 AM
6

It's not equality if the majority of scholarships are for women (of those that have a gender clause).
/r/MensRights27/05/17 11:11 AM
9

Where I live women routinely clean in men's areas within swimming halls. It didn't feel right. Men and boys felt awkward, or at least I did. Also the cleaner girls weren't always obviously happy with the situation. But because it was men and boys who mostly felt bad nothing was done about it. Finally I stopped visiting swimming halls (and started exercising more efficiently). I wonder how the refugees from Islam countries feel about it.
/r/MensRights27/05/17 09:37 AM
5

Women could during a war, in theory, have a responsibility to serve their country either with weapons or without. But this is clearly too difficult and against equality - the way the powers that be, feminists and conservatives in particular, see it.
/r/MensRights27/05/17 09:08 AM
17

So you're saying that oppression will end when men get the same rights as women? A noble idea - but I believe that we're hardwired to oppress men if women and children need it. That's something that is almost impossible to change.
/r/MensRights27/05/17 08:44 AM
10

Most feminists think that the military is a male, evil institution and nothing good would come out of it if women were forced to join. That is, of course, as silly as only feminist "facts" can be. Either you're ready to stand up for something you believe in, like democracy, or you should shut up. And, yeah, in places like Syria it's not that simple but even there the good guys, men, are fighting for noble causes.
/r/MensRights27/05/17 08:25 AM
69

Interestingly enough, women's happiness and feeling of well-being has been dropping since the "triumph of feminism". Let's force them into the military, discriminate against them in schools, tell them to woman up, take the kids away after a divorce and so forth and one day they won't happier than men anymore. But, of course, that could never happen. Anyway, women were happier when they could pretty freely choose not to work if they wanted to. Running in the rat race have made them less happy. An…
/r/MensRights27/05/17 08:18 AM
5

Yeah, masculinity, something you all can hate together. It's strange how this academically fringe theory of men being guilty of everything has so fucking much power to move societies. It really makes me angry and I, for example, stopped voting because my vote would almost for sure go to a party that thinks men are a class of people that should have less rights than women. It's crazy but, oh, so true.
/r/MensRights27/05/17 08:09 AM
1

I live in a country (Finland) that used to have one of the highest male suicide rates. For some reason the number of suicides has been going down since the early 90s pretty dramatically. Perhaps it's better medication, perhaps the health care institutions don't discriminate against men so much they used to. Whatever the reason is, it seems to be an internationals trend, though not in all countries.
/r/MensRights27/05/17 07:55 AM
11

Most feminist are just ignorant. Women in the western world face so little actual discrimination, let alone oppression, that feminists really don't have the urge to find out about equality. (Men face clearly more discrimination but we are taught not to think it as discrimination. So men, too, tend to know little about equality. But when a man understands how much men and particularly boys are discriminated against, he often develops an urge to study how the world works regarding equality.)
/r/MensRights27/05/17 06:18 AM
3

in Finland the Green Party, which is very feminist and quite big, published a report on the problems boys have in schools. It was, of course, pure bullshit from start to end, not acknowledging how big the problem is and what are the real and academically studied reasons behind it. One of the frustrating claims was that boys do so much worse than girls is that the are too privileged. In other words teacher think that boys will be boys and don't demand them to work as hard as they demand the girls…
/r/MensRights27/05/17 04:31 AM
1

Feminism is not about equality. Period. If you want to make the world a better place for men and, particularly, for women you have start seeing feminism as an enemy. Sorry to say it but that's the bottom line. Otherwise a decent post.
/r/MensRights26/05/17 06:20 PM
1

Just stop talking to women.
/r/MensRights26/05/17 04:33 PM
5

Women don't want men in their homes. They might be rapists or something worse, in their opinion. I happen to know something about the cleaning business because a close friend of mine is a boss in one of the major cleaning firms. He said that Nigerian cleaners are the best but women don't want to hire them. They are discriminated against both because of their ethnic background and sex.
/r/MensRights26/05/17 03:19 PM
8

The Huffington Post, that is probably the most sexist media outlet, even more so than the Guardian, every now and then manages to surprise me. Why wasn't there a misandrist spin - or didn't I read the article carefully enough?
/r/MensRights26/05/17 12:09 PM
6

I've been in a loving relationship with a woman after her periods ended a few years ago. Before that it was a roller coaster. I could never be sure whether she was going to hit me or love me. But I have always thought that it's the way women are and if you want have family you just have to endure. And this is true.
/r/MensRights26/05/17 12:03 PM
3

Women know women
/r/MensRights26/05/17 08:25 AM
11

Come to think of it, Egypt and India have been in the news because women have been groped in a very vile way. Then again India is a big country and it could be that it's problem in just some areas. And then again, i don't trust any news anymore that says women are oppressed and men evil.
/r/MensRights26/05/17 08:23 AM
1

It sound inevitable that women who are really career minded make more money than "similar" men. The reason is that they are so few and thus more likely to be fit for the job.
/r/MensRights26/05/17 07:04 AM
47

The problem here is that these lunatics make me hate all kinds of things I didn't hate - and even loved - before I got into studying gender issues. I can't read the newspapers that used to be my favorites. I can't watch news channels that were on while I was working. And now it seems that I have to stop watching Hollywood movies, too. Too much lunacy,
/r/MensRights26/05/17 07:00 AM
3

If girls come men will follow. It's business.
/r/MensRights26/05/17 06:48 AM
36

I have never touched a woman unless I was sure she wanted me to touch her. But I have been touched several times by women who sure as hell didn't have my permission. These feminist-minded people live in a dreamland - or somewhere I haven't visited. Which one is it? Are there places where women get groped and men don't?
/r/MensRights26/05/17 06:46 AM
1

I'm not sure, though it's one of the cornerstone of happiness research. And so says googling, too. http://science.howstuffworks.com/life/men-or-women-happier.htm
/r/MensRights26/05/17 06:37 AM
1

Thanks for the explanation. I hope you noticed "on average". Of course you could argue that in Somalia the quality of life isn't poor on average. I'm pretty sure it is - but you might disagree and there is indeed no way to resolve the disagreement if you think that the quality of life is not absolute but relative.
/r/MensRights25/05/17 09:29 PM
1

Women are happier.
/r/MensRights25/05/17 09:18 PM
1

My life is absolutely better because I live in a rich welfare state. Absolutely. The women here are absolutely better off on average. I'm not stupid (I hope) but I just don't get your point. People are for practical purposes divided in classes and some are better off in absolute term. I could argue that it's meaningless to talk about men and women and what's their quality of life is on average. Fine! But that's not the world we live in.
/r/MensRights25/05/17 09:11 PM
1

My purpose? My purpose is to find out what's true. Anyway, check out the OECD's Better Life Index if you really, honestly, think that women are worse off. But I don't think you do. Every person capable of critical thinking knows enough about how the world works and who's the better-off sex.
/r/MensRights25/05/17 08:56 PM
1

The academic research talks about subjective and objective quality of life. Subjective is happiness or the feeling of well-being. Objective is many more things like safety, education, home, social webs, and so on. Women are better off in almost all respects.
/r/MensRights25/05/17 08:37 PM
1

I answered already.
/r/MensRights25/05/17 08:30 PM
1

But there is a thing called the quality of life. People in Finland have it but people in Somalia don't on average. There is even academic research done about why this is so.
/r/MensRights25/05/17 08:28 PM
1

I don't believe, like you apparently do, that everything is subjective. There is the scientific method, after all, the method that made western countries special. Bur yeah, carrying on this discussion obliviously serves no purpose. Have a nice life an educate yourself. :D
/r/MensRights25/05/17 08:22 PM
1

But the quality of life has been studied scientifically. We know what are the ingredients of a good life. In that sense it's not subjective.
/r/MensRights25/05/17 06:17 PM
1

I think it's an extremely important question.
/r/MensRights25/05/17 06:14 PM
6

Something like that but is Quora a feminist organization. I so much wished it's not but...
/r/MensRights25/05/17 05:09 PM
1

I asked a question you can read in the title. There seems to a problem with communication.
/r/MensRights25/05/17 05:05 PM
1

Womens quality of life is much better on average. I've got no reason to discuss anything with you if you don't know this self-evident fact.
/r/MensRights25/05/17 04:23 PM
2

Why did Quora delete my question? It should be against everything they stand for - or claim that they stand for? I mean, they can't be bad people but people with high moral standards with a critical and inquisitive mind - or can they?
/r/MensRights25/05/17 11:07 AM
2

The same goes for hiring feminists, both female and male. Always google if the person is a committed feminist. But don't discriminate against young people who have been sucked into the gynocentric propaganda. We all were feminists before we learned about the feminazis.
/r/MensRights25/05/17 06:38 AM
2

And no feminist, nobody in the corridors of power knows about this or cares.
/r/MensRights25/05/17 06:19 AM
9

Never ever help women you don't know. It's that simple.
/r/MensRights20/05/17 07:10 PM
12

Middle-aged male suicide is a silent crisis Very silent. The majority of suicides have been committed by men since there have been statistics. But who cares, it's just men killing themselves. If it were women, it would be a different matter. Trust me, a very different matter. But what about the health care in general? Do men get the same treatment and resources as women do? A close friend of mine, a male friend who is the head surgeon in a middle-sized hospital, said that there is no question ab…
/r/MensRights20/05/17 06:30 PM
5

A prosecutor in Sweden wanted to investigate if Assange was guilty because two women accused him of rape and molestation. there seems to be zero evidence that the women worked for somebody else. But, yeah, fake rape accusations have in all likelihood been used to get powerful men ousted or at least in trouble.
/r/MensRights19/05/17 03:25 PM
8

It wasn't "obviously fake". No matter how much you downvote, it still wasn't obviously fake. It was a typical she said he said situation that never got fully investigated - or so it seems now.
/r/MensRights19/05/17 03:05 PM
6

When a niece of mine moved to Australia we talked about the country in a family meeting. Everybody was saying that it's a nice place and people are friendly (but the animals not so much and it's very far from Europe and the family). I had no idea back then that the universities seem to be ruled by crazy people. And now she's studying in one of them, poor girl.
/r/MensRights19/05/17 02:47 PM
8

1 in 5 girls and 1 in 20 boys is a victim of child sexual abuse Probably not true, sounds like feminist statistics.
/r/MensRights19/05/17 05:51 AM
1

Isn't whole idea of the Common Law that from now on everybody can appeal to the harm any punishment could do to the career? I know it's not that simple but didn't the judge open the door for such a defense anyway?
/r/MensRights18/05/17 07:42 PM
4

There is no reason to believe anything these kind of drug addicts, facing life imprisonment (or death penalty), say. Most of them will go for the "insanity defense", and if they're women, they'll add all kinds of abuses they have suffered to invoke sympathy.
/r/MensRights18/05/17 07:31 PM
2

"I can't see why any man in his right mind would become a teacher." Well, he did. Wasn't he in his right mind? Or wasn't he told about the risks? We need male teachers and hopefully there will be one day environments without (most of) the risks. Until then, I understand very well if male individuals want to stay out.
/r/MensRights18/05/17 07:07 PM
2

What's assumed to be the best outcome for the children overrides pretty much everything else. That'd be a good principle if only it worked fairly.
/r/MensRights18/05/17 11:14 AM
1

LOL! I can see why she is a Feminist icon. Exactly the knowledge, intelligence and logic they deserve.
/r/MensRights18/05/17 09:10 AM
3

At the same time they seem to have gained more power within governments, big organizations (like the UN, EU), and institutions (like many churches, law enforcement).
/r/MensRights18/05/17 08:08 AM
1

Could you give a link? I know that several such sites that resemble this but are "objectifying" women have been taken down. But you're saying that there are similar sites that publish candid pictures almost solely of young white women. And if so, why do you think that they have to be afraid?
/r/MensRights18/05/17 07:52 AM
3

The new government against the left rather than supporting it. That said, there are feminist loonies in every party. It's as if it was a requirement to be a bit crazy to even qualify for a feminist politician.
/r/MensRights18/05/17 07:05 AM
2

They rename these Feminist titles and institutions/organizations because they are (somewhat) unconstitutional or against the ethos of how they see what they represent (liberté, égalité, fraternité for everybody, not just women). But very little might change - at first. In the long run it's harder to fight against equality if your "job description" says that's exactly what you shouldn't be doing.
/r/MensRights18/05/17 07:01 AM
1

Where I live "roam like at home" probably will mean rising costs or the end of unlimited data. For me, because I only rarely leave the country, it's a bad deal. But I really thing that the EU has a big problem with the fact that only a few voters really care what's going on. That leaves too much room for cabinet politics and lobbying, particularly big firms and big countries - and certainly feminists - have too much lobbying power.. The EU has a huge effect on our lives through the legislation b…
/r/MensRights17/05/17 03:50 PM
1

The EU decided in 2012 that men and women have to pay the same insurance fees. Before that women paid more for the vehicle insurance because they cost more to the insurance companies. On the other hand men used to pay more for many other insurances. Women lost more! Believe it or not. I wonder if women still pay more outside of the EU.
/r/MensRights17/05/17 12:49 PM
1

Feminist have realized that it's even easier to operate within the EU than in their native countries. The EU is , after all, a lobbying machine where parliament members don't have to take the voters into account because nobody cares.
/r/MensRights17/05/17 09:24 AM
2

Many surgeons have psychopathic tendencies, too (yes they do, for example in a stressful situations the emotions won't take over which is important for a surgeon who's doing demanding operations).
/r/MensRights17/05/17 07:29 AM
14

It's not only female privilege, it's white female privilege, or perhaps young beautiful white female privilege?
/r/MensRights17/05/17 06:04 AM
10

Boys are discriminated against in schools and are falling behind and then they let these lunatics come in and spit in their faces with their delusions about the boys being the privileged ones.
/r/MensRights17/05/17 03:13 AM
0

She ... had been abused by another former partner, her defence lawyer told the court. What a surprise! /s
/r/MensRights17/05/17 02:51 AM
20

There's an empathy gap, too, that prevents us from helping men. Women, on the other hand, we tend to like and for that reason protect (though not all women as much).
/r/MensRights16/05/17 04:38 PM
3

100 ACTS FOR GENDER EQUALITY. But only a small portion is in English and Google really can't translate between English and Finnish. Now that I read it, it actually says: An accepted act is a concrete and new measure that enhances gender equality or the realization of women’s rights in Finland. Knowing what "gender equality" really means, no wonder there are no initiatives or acts addressing men's problems. The educational gap can be found in the PISA reports: Finland is the only country (among t…
/r/MensRights16/05/17 06:27 AM
1

Being afraid of male strangers must be genetic in some way (not directly though, genes don't give specific orders as far as I know). Fear then can easily turn into hatred. That could be one mechanism behind misandry. Another mechanism is also genetic in a sense: Most girls fell in love with the same popular boys. Some boys have always taken advantage of this innate trait of girls. But because only one or a couple of the girls can have the boy in the end the rest will get pissed off. At that poin…
/r/MensRights15/05/17 07:30 PM
1

Researchers have gone through hundreds or thousand of court cases and found out that men are sent to prison more often and for longer time for similar crimes. If we, in addition, assume that the police is as efficient to find and arrest both male and female criminals, then it follows that that the number of men in prison relative to the crime rate of men must be bigger than that of women. That's an example of how you can use data that is collected for something else to - roughly - prove another …
/r/MensRights15/05/17 11:05 AM
2

"If you're privileged, you don't see your privileges" is one of the rare good points of feminism (although it's more nuanced, of course). Here you could say, that she interprets her privilege wrong because she's so privileged.
/r/MensRights15/05/17 10:20 AM
1

Who did what crime is hard to study because criminals, well, don't want to tell, not even anonymously. Victims are a bit more reliable but there still are, as in all surveys, big uncertainties mainly because all(?) people lie even when they don't seem to get any real reward from it. It's a habit. And it's hard to find out which answers are true and which are not (though there are methods that can partly solve that problem). People lie even to themselves. They think they remember things right whe…
/r/MensRights15/05/17 10:15 AM
3

Something about the discrimination on the rental markets would be ice. Unfortunately, I've found only anecdotal evidence; it's like a problem that people know about but nobody has studied (because it affects men but not women). But perhaps I haven't been looking hard enough. Nevertheless, it's a big problem because it steers men towards bad neighborhoods and homelessness.
/r/MensRights15/05/17 08:46 AM
25

Finland also celebrates the independence by introducing 100 equality initiatives by different organizations. So far none of the 70 chosen initiatives have mentioned any problems men have - though there is one minor project for boys - and most are about girls and women. And the whole project is managed by feminists. At the same time in the real world all men in Finland are required to serve up to a year either in the military or civil service. The much applauded education system is one of the mos…
/r/MensRights15/05/17 07:43 AM
14

Last year Finland celebrated the women's suffrage that was introduced in Finland in 1906 as the first "country" (Finland was a Grand duchy, not an independent country at the time) in Europe. Of course they "forgot" that most men, too, got the right to vote at the same time. In other words, Finland was the first place that introduced universal suffrage in Europe and second or third in the whole world. But that was apparently too insignificant to celebrate because almost nobody mentioned it.
/r/MensRights15/05/17 07:20 AM
1

A desperate attempt to get the widening gender gap, which is eroding the foundations of the western civiiztion, to the political agenda. It's desperate because even in this sub only a minority knows that the gap is widening, and of those who know it, only a smaller minority understands that it's eroding the foundations of the system that has brought us this unforeseen prosperity. So, I wouldn't use it as an elevator pitch, though it's true.
/r/MensRights15/04/17 05:44 AM
7

Saying something like that about women would make national news, perhaps even international news.
/r/MensRights15/04/17 04:44 AM
2

Fighting feminism, that's what I have to keep on doing.
/r/MensRights14/04/17 06:56 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter