TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

mikesteane Archive

View 226 posts and 16,600 comments by mikesteane on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
505

Generalmikesteane/r/MensRights02/09/21 09:37 AM
349

mikesteane/r/MensRights23/12/11 06:26 AM
257

mikesteane/r/MensRights20/08/12 02:03 AM
198

LTRmikesteane/r/TheRedPill26/08/15 11:54 AM
186

Activism/Supportmikesteane/r/MensRights27/05/18 05:44 AM
178

Reverse Gendersmikesteane/r/MensRights07/03/15 06:50 AM
164

Red Pill Theorymikesteane/r/TheRedPill16/11/15 07:28 AM
149

mikesteane/r/MensRights21/06/12 08:20 AM
147

Intactivismmikesteane/r/MensRights09/02/23 02:48 PM
146

Social Issuesmikesteane/r/MensRights07/11/21 12:08 PM
139

mikesteane/r/MensRights08/09/12 05:31 AM
119

mikesteane/r/MensRights15/12/12 06:32 AM
119

False Accusationsmikesteane/r/MensRights16/08/14 09:35 AM
117

Red Pill Theorymikesteane/r/TheRedPill18/05/15 11:18 AM
85

Generalmikesteane/r/MensRights07/03/22 05:18 AM
81

Humourmikesteane/r/MensRights07/10/18 06:01 AM
79

Edu./Occu.mikesteane/r/MensRights27/08/17 12:28 PM
77

mikesteane/r/MensRights31/10/14 12:06 AM
74

Red Pill Theorymikesteane/r/TheRedPill15/08/17 11:42 AM
70

mikesteane/r/MensRights21/10/12 04:40 AM
67

Generalmikesteane/r/MensRights11/02/22 03:32 AM
63

mikesteane/r/MensRights16/04/13 10:49 AM
63

False Accusationsmikesteane/r/MensRights02/08/14 09:44 AM
61

mikesteane/r/MensRights21/06/12 08:06 AM
59

mikesteane/r/MensRights22/12/12 07:54 AM
58

Feminismmikesteane/r/MensRights27/11/22 09:48 AM
57

Red Pill Theorymikesteane/r/TheRedPill15/08/15 07:38 AM
56

Humourmikesteane/r/MensRights07/08/20 09:48 AM
54

Intactivismmikesteane/r/MensRights25/09/21 01:07 PM
52

Intactivismmikesteane/r/MensRights04/09/17 11:37 AM
50

Discriminationmikesteane/r/MensRights11/02/19 10:44 AM
48

Healthmikesteane/r/MensRights16/11/22 01:45 AM
47

Feminismmikesteane/r/MensRights09/07/21 09:54 AM
45

Anti-MRMmikesteane/r/MensRights29/05/22 10:42 AM
45

mikesteane/r/MensRights19/08/11 12:18 PM
44

mikesteane/r/MensRights27/05/12 06:51 AM
44

mikesteane/r/MensRights08/12/12 07:07 AM
43

Social Issuesmikesteane/r/MensRights06/10/20 01:04 AM
42

Intactivismmikesteane/r/MensRights12/05/17 12:08 PM
41

Social Issuesmikesteane/r/MensRights16/11/21 12:14 PM
39

mikesteane/r/MensRights03/08/12 11:59 AM
39

Social Issuesmikesteane/r/MensRights01/12/21 11:44 AM
39

Intactivismmikesteane/r/MensRights16/04/18 07:06 AM
38

Humourmikesteane/r/MensRights21/08/22 12:16 PM
36

Intactivismmikesteane/r/MensRights12/08/15 06:46 AM
35

Metamikesteane/r/TheRedPill19/02/16 08:32 AM
35

Activism/Supportmikesteane/r/MensRights17/01/19 12:07 PM
31

Activism/Supportmikesteane/r/MensRights03/10/18 11:24 PM
29

mikesteane/r/MensRights28/08/12 07:29 AM
29

mikesteane/r/MensRights27/12/12 06:59 AM
29

mikesteane/r/MensRights06/06/12 06:52 AM
29

mikesteane/r/MensRights07/10/12 07:59 AM
29

Feminismmikesteane/r/MensRights04/12/20 09:18 AM
29

mikesteane/r/MensRights12/08/16 06:06 AM
28

mikesteane/r/MensRights05/09/11 09:53 AM
28

mikesteane/r/MensRights02/07/11 01:05 PM
28

mikesteane/r/MensRights08/11/14 08:57 AM
28

Humourmikesteane/r/MensRights10/07/21 07:57 AM
27

mikesteane/r/MensRights16/05/12 08:21 AM
24

mikesteane/r/MensRights02/06/11 07:26 AM
24

mikesteane/r/MensRights18/06/11 01:42 AM
24

mikesteane/r/MensRights09/07/11 09:32 AM
23

Feminismmikesteane/r/MensRights12/12/15 03:49 AM
22

mikesteane/r/MensRights05/06/12 05:04 AM
22

mikesteane/r/MensRights03/07/12 05:47 AM
22

mikesteane/r/MensRights30/10/12 04:11 AM
22

mikesteane/r/MensRights06/07/12 07:54 AM
22

mikesteane/r/MensRights18/02/12 05:37 AM
22

mikesteane/r/MensRights14/12/11 10:08 AM
22

mikesteane/r/MensRights30/03/11 09:16 AM
21

mikesteane/r/MensRights14/08/13 06:38 AM
21

Discussionmikesteane/r/MensRights22/03/15 12:41 AM
21

mikesteane/r/MensRights15/09/11 06:47 AM
20

mikesteane/r/MensRights26/11/11 11:10 PM
19

Social Issuesmikesteane/r/MensRights07/05/22 10:29 AM
19

mikesteane/r/TheRedPill28/04/15 06:05 AM
19

mikesteane/r/MensRights25/10/14 02:04 AM
17

mikesteane/r/MensRights04/08/12 07:50 AM
16

Fathers/Custodymikesteane/r/MensRights23/11/15 06:37 AM
16

mikesteane/r/MensRights13/06/13 12:26 PM
16

mikesteane/r/MensRights18/06/11 04:18 AM
16

Social Issuesmikesteane/r/MensRights19/10/20 11:58 PM
16

mikesteane/r/MensRights25/06/12 12:14 PM
15

mikesteane/r/MensRights04/12/12 07:40 AM
15

Generalmikesteane/r/MensRights27/12/22 12:14 AM
15

mikesteane/r/MensRights14/08/12 08:40 AM
15

Discussionmikesteane/r/MensRights15/03/15 07:10 AM
14

Action Op.mikesteane/r/MensRights12/09/14 06:43 AM
14

False Accusationmikesteane/r/MensRights04/07/17 12:10 PM
14

Intactivismmikesteane/r/MensRights19/08/17 05:00 PM
14

mikesteane/r/MensRights06/08/11 02:28 PM
14

Feminismmikesteane/r/MensRights11/01/21 11:45 AM
14

mikesteane/r/MensRights11/01/12 11:06 AM
14

mikesteane/r/MensRights22/11/12 06:35 AM
13

Generalmikesteane/r/MensRights15/10/22 01:54 AM
13

mikesteane/r/MensRights06/11/11 11:46 AM
13

DISCUSSIONmikesteane/r/RedPillWomen25/09/16 03:47 AM
13

Humourmikesteane/r/MensRights26/03/21 09:29 AM
12

mikesteane/r/MensRights07/01/12 11:06 PM
12

Healthmikesteane/r/MensRights21/11/22 09:44 AM
11

Discussionmikesteane/r/MensRights26/03/15 05:05 AM
11

mikesteane/r/MensRights23/07/12 08:56 AM
11

Social Issuesmikesteane/r/MensRights29/11/20 08:12 AM
11

mikesteane/r/MensRights17/09/12 07:49 AM
11

Intactivismmikesteane/r/MensRights04/08/15 02:13 PM
11

Feminismmikesteane/r/MensRights09/03/21 04:38 AM
11

Humourmikesteane/r/MensRights23/07/21 04:55 AM
10

mikesteane/r/MensRights04/12/12 08:01 AM
10

False Accusationmikesteane/r/MensRights23/09/18 02:01 PM
10

Humourmikesteane/r/MensRights29/07/17 02:09 PM
10

Feminismmikesteane/r/MensRights27/01/19 03:06 AM
9

Activism/Supportmikesteane/r/MensRights22/01/19 08:05 AM
9

mikesteane/r/MensRights28/07/11 06:53 AM
9

mikesteane/r/MensRights16/08/11 07:20 AM
9

Questionmikesteane/r/MensRights28/10/14 11:58 PM
9

Social Issuesmikesteane/r/MensRights27/11/15 08:02 AM
8

Generalmikesteane/r/MensRights29/12/21 01:33 AM
8

Social Issuesmikesteane/r/MensRights15/08/18 09:32 AM
7

mikesteane/r/MensRights18/09/11 12:25 AM
7

mikesteane/r/MensRights27/06/11 01:35 PM
7

mikesteane/r/MensRights27/01/12 05:52 AM
7

mikesteane/r/MensRights24/04/12 07:15 AM
7

mikesteane/r/MensRights07/07/11 07:40 AM
7

Social Issuesmikesteane/r/MensRights13/09/21 10:27 AM
7

Social Issuesmikesteane/r/MensRights12/02/23 05:29 AM
7

mikesteane/r/MensRights24/01/13 12:31 PM
7

mikesteane/r/MensRights22/11/11 10:23 AM
7

mikesteane/r/MensRights15/11/16 11:18 PM
6

mikesteane/r/MensRights21/05/11 05:36 AM
6

Healthmikesteane/r/MensRights26/04/22 05:36 AM
6

mikesteane/r/MensRights15/03/12 05:55 AM
6

Discussionmikesteane/r/MensRights23/09/14 07:05 AM
6

mikesteane/r/MensRights02/08/16 01:34 AM
6

Generalmikesteane/r/MensRights14/06/21 09:37 AM
6

mikesteane/r/MensRights04/01/13 05:52 AM
5

Activism/Supportmikesteane/r/MensRights15/07/17 12:39 AM
5

Humourmikesteane/r/MensRights22/12/20 09:11 AM
5

Humourmikesteane/r/MensRights12/11/22 11:17 AM
5

mikesteane/r/MensRights18/08/14 08:47 AM
4

mikesteane/r/MensRights24/12/12 07:41 AM
4

Questionsmikesteane/r/MensRights17/10/15 06:38 AM
4

mikesteane/r/MensRights28/12/12 07:32 AM
4

mikesteane/r/MensRights02/01/13 06:38 AM
4

mikesteane/r/MensRights13/07/11 11:44 PM
4

Discussionmikesteane/r/MensRights05/11/14 01:01 AM
4

mikesteane/r/MensRights23/10/12 12:00 AM
4

Humourmikesteane/r/MensRights24/10/20 01:17 AM
4

Feminismmikesteane/r/MensRights12/01/22 08:03 AM
4

mikesteane/r/MensRights13/01/12 09:16 AM
4

mikesteane/r/MensRights18/11/11 12:29 AM
4

mikesteane/r/MensRights10/01/13 06:42 AM
4

Metamikesteane/r/TheRedPill28/01/17 12:52 AM
3

Humourmikesteane/r/MensRights29/09/20 11:18 PM
3

mikesteane/r/MensRights17/10/14 02:59 AM
3

Humourmikesteane/r/MensRights18/10/18 09:53 AM
3

mikesteane/r/MensRights08/06/12 06:30 AM
3

mikesteane/r/MensRights28/03/12 06:09 AM
3

mikesteane/r/MensRights05/02/12 09:49 AM
3

mikesteane/r/MensRights26/02/13 12:03 PM
3

Generalmikesteane/r/MensRights19/02/16 11:08 AM
3

mikesteane/r/MensRights09/04/12 08:41 AM
3

mikesteane/r/MensRights22/05/12 02:14 AM
3

mikesteane/r/MensRights16/07/11 03:19 AM
3

Legal Rightsmikesteane/r/MensRights04/12/20 11:42 PM
3

Feminismmikesteane/r/MensRights13/10/18 12:37 AM
3

Generalmikesteane/r/MensRights31/12/20 03:24 AM
3

Discussionmikesteane/r/MensRights04/07/14 08:42 AM
2

mikesteane/r/MensRights07/10/11 11:14 PM
2

Generalmikesteane/r/MensRights13/09/18 03:25 AM
2

mikesteane/r/MensRights14/07/11 05:37 AM
2

Social Issuesmikesteane/r/MensRights22/01/22 02:30 AM
2

mikesteane/r/MensRights16/09/11 06:15 AM
2

Discussionmikesteane/r/MensRights10/01/15 11:03 PM
2

Legal Rightsmikesteane/r/MensRights02/09/16 02:30 AM
2

mikesteane/r/MensRights01/09/18 08:53 AM
2

mikesteane/r/MensRights25/09/11 05:18 AM
2

mikesteane/r/MensRights22/08/13 08:56 AM
2

Humourmikesteane/r/MensRights11/08/20 06:44 AM
2

mikesteane/r/MensRights25/10/11 03:38 AM
1

mikesteane/r/MensRights11/04/12 06:05 AM
1

Humourmikesteane/r/MensRights08/04/22 09:13 AM
1

mikesteane/r/MensRights14/07/11 02:27 AM
1

Analysismikesteane/r/MensRights09/08/14 02:21 AM
1

mikesteane/r/MensRights19/02/12 06:17 AM
1

False Accusationmikesteane/r/MensRights23/09/18 02:00 PM
1

Activism/Supportmikesteane/r/MensRights22/01/19 04:26 AM
1

mikesteane/r/MensRights26/05/12 08:42 AM
1

mikesteane/r/MensRights04/07/13 09:52 AM
1

mikesteane/r/MensRights20/01/12 09:30 AM
1

Storymikesteane/r/MensRights22/07/14 04:54 AM
1

Opinionmikesteane/r/MensRights17/01/15 12:21 AM
1

mikesteane/r/MensRights27/01/19 02:59 AM
1

False Accusationmikesteane/r/MensRights11/10/18 11:55 PM
1

mikesteane/r/MensRights16/07/12 07:18 AM
1

mikesteane/r/MensRights31/07/12 08:17 AM
1

mikesteane/r/MensRights18/08/11 07:01 AM
0

Fitnessmikesteane/r/TheRedPill03/07/15 09:25 AM
0

mikesteane/r/MensRights18/08/12 02:35 AM
0

Discussionmikesteane/r/MensRights05/01/15 10:44 AM
0

mikesteane/r/MensRights02/07/11 02:10 AM
0

False Accusationsmikesteane/r/MensRights23/10/14 11:11 AM
0

mikesteane/r/MensRights13/04/12 07:02 AM
0

mikesteane/r/MensRights23/02/12 11:04 PM
0

mikesteane/r/MensRights04/08/14 05:17 AM
0

mikesteane/r/MensRights01/06/13 09:49 AM
0

mikesteane/r/MensRights15/12/11 04:23 AM
0

Social Issuesmikesteane/r/MensRights03/03/18 03:29 AM
0

mikesteane/r/MensRights12/11/11 09:18 AM
0

mikesteane/r/MensRights07/04/11 09:46 AM
0

mikesteane/r/MensRights18/06/13 10:55 PM
0

mikesteane/r/MensRights21/08/11 02:40 AM
0

Blogs/Videomikesteane/r/MensRights21/10/14 04:46 AM
0

mikesteane/r/MensRights30/09/11 11:22 AM
0

mikesteane/r/TheRedPill27/04/15 11:52 AM
0

mikesteane/r/MensRights25/11/11 09:44 AM
0

Generalmikesteane/r/MensRights21/12/15 11:04 AM
0

mikesteane/r/MensRights10/10/11 06:59 AM
0

mikesteane/r/MensRights13/08/11 09:59 AM
0

mikesteane/r/MensRights14/06/12 08:32 AM
0

mikesteane/r/MensRights22/02/12 06:05 AM
0

mikesteane/r/MensRights31/07/11 12:34 AM
0

mikesteane/r/MensRights01/05/11 05:56 AM
0

mikesteane/r/MensRights13/05/12 11:57 AM
0

mikesteane/r/MensRights10/03/13 08:48 AM
0

mikesteane/r/TheRedPill25/06/15 12:05 AM
0

Fitnessmikesteane/r/TheRedPill06/05/15 01:29 PM
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 16,600 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-3

They also claim, and I believe them, that there is a very high suicide rate, figures going up to 40% among trans-sexuals. Anything that causes that kind of outcome is a disease.
/r/MensRights19/03/23 11:55 AM
1

Being trans is not a disease, Yes, it is.
/r/MensRights19/03/23 10:48 AM
82

Google translation: Who is Roma Gallardo and the reason for his controversial sex change "Any man can go to the registry and enjoy all the advantages that being a woman in Spain has over men," he said. After the approval of the trans law, the testimonies of several men have emerged who say they have changed their legal sex in the Civil Registry instantly to "benefit" from the advantages that women have in rights in Spain. One of the most notorious has been the case of Roma Gallardo, who claims t…
/r/MensRights19/03/23 06:11 AM
0

You mean "educated".
/r/MensRights19/03/23 04:33 AM
3

Yep, women had no right to vote until the 1980s. That's when they found they liked voting on Pop Idol so much, that they thought it might nice to vote in general elections. So they asked and it was immediately given to them.
/r/MensRights18/03/23 08:22 AM
1

Lawyer up.
/r/MensRights18/03/23 07:09 AM
3

if we stopped generalizing Most of your comments are generalizations.
/r/MensRights18/03/23 03:52 AM
12

My wife, to whom I am happily married, works with elderly people. Many of them are happily married after 50 to 80 years. Modern society makes it much more difficult, but it is still possible. I would bet that there are no enduring happy marriages with men who are blue pilled though.
/r/MensRights18/03/23 12:47 AM
13

Where women were treated poorly until the 1980s No, they weren't. Women have always been generally privileged. All times all places.
/r/MensRights17/03/23 11:40 PM
2

Now is your chance to learn to shut up. Take a recorder to your meeting and just ask questions. Get her to talk, she will be happy, but she will probably make a record of her saying things that can be used against her at any time in the future.
/r/MensRights15/03/23 09:27 PM
2

Women did not have right to own property And all property that a wife held at the time of marriage See the problem?
/r/MensRights15/03/23 09:17 PM
1

You'd think with doing everything they do while men just sit around that women wouldn't have time for this sort of ovary action. But you'd be wrong.
/r/MensRights15/03/23 06:59 AM
2

If you make a complaint, you need to use the correct terminology: "modern teaching methodology", "professional ethics", "creating a hostile environment", "showing disrespect based on a racial or gender category", "bringing the school into disrepute" etc.
/r/MensRights14/03/23 10:08 AM
5

they need to stop teaching breathing. Fixed it.
/r/MensRights14/03/23 09:38 AM
-1

Talk to him and make predictions. Then when those predictions come true, he will be ready to listen.
/r/MensRights13/03/23 08:59 AM
1

I wrote to her by registered mail asking her whether it was true before publishing a song on the subject. She did not reply. I therefore conclude that it is all true, especially since being a high court judge, she has an obligation not to bring her position into disrepute.
/r/MensRights13/03/23 06:51 AM
8

Don't conflate feminism with women.
/r/MensRights12/03/23 09:12 PM
112

Not long ago, Ursula Von der Leyen and Charles Michel visited Turkish President Erdogan, where there was only a chair for Michel and not for Von der Leyen. Von Der Leyen actually had a sofa.
/r/MensRights12/03/23 12:21 PM
3

There is nothing quite like a woman who has gotten to the top in a competitive field proclaiming how much better they are than the men. You've obviously never seen an enraged elephant taking a shit.
/r/MensRights12/03/23 08:36 AM
5

It's equality if we assume that the average woman in such a position does 2/3 of the work of a man in the same position.
/r/MensRights12/03/23 08:36 AM
66

Assuming, incorrectly, that men hold more power than women.
/r/MensRights12/03/23 07:18 AM
3

Why do people insist on believing that feminist propaganda is true for far away times and places? They can see the pack of lies relating to current times in the Western World but still insist on believing the same misrepresentation in the past. Recently, I had a similar encounter with a poster referring to abuse of women in his country, which turned out to be India. Later he said these abuses were not happening in urban environments like the one he lived in but only in the remote villages. I wou…
/r/MensRights12/03/23 01:22 AM
1

they could only get certain types of jobs, if they could even get any at all. What jobs were they and what laws confined them to those jobs. Women have always been able to vote in local elections. General elections were another matter. In 1850 only 5% of men were able to vote. Universal suffrage was, in the big scheme of things, almost simultaneous for the two sexes. Men always had far more responsibilities than women including, for example, military conscription. they were always expected to be…
/r/MensRights11/03/23 12:59 PM
1

Women's interests are not well represented by feminism.
/r/MensRights11/03/23 12:18 PM
6

Simple fact, men decided women should not be able to vote. Actually, it's not a simple fact. It's not a fact at all. In Britain, women were always able to vote in local elections, because they had an interest in the outcome. In national elections, universal voting was achieved slowly, bit by bit. For hundreds of years, parliament's main function was to authorise, or refuse, the Monarch's right to levy taxes and raise armies. Married women were not responsible for their own taxes until well into …
/r/MensRights11/03/23 09:10 AM
1

Women have historically been given the short end of this stick and not been given the same amount of rights as us, You need to justify an outrageous statement like that by producing evidence with specific times and places.
/r/MensRights11/03/23 08:57 AM
4

It looks like it. Especially since it was a test case; the judges were, in effect, making law at this point.
/r/MensRights11/03/23 06:32 AM
19

In the Magill case, it appears that one of the High Court judges in the test case, Susan Crennan, had herself committed paternity fraud.
/r/MensRights11/03/23 06:03 AM
10

Women can drive and go out in public in Saudi. They make up the majority of university students. You are living in the past. Afghanistan is pretty nasty for everyone. Women are protected by being kept inside; it is not an unfair restriction, it is a privilege which results in men having to do ALL non domestic work.
/r/MensRights10/03/23 04:19 PM
6

Specific rights you are talking about here?
/r/MensRights10/03/23 03:49 PM
13

Sources cited at the bottom of the page, as I said.
/r/MensRights10/03/23 03:18 PM
12

"Contrary to popular belief, men are almost twice as likely to be the victim of a violent crime than women, with 2.4% of males having experienced violent crime in the past year, compared to 1.3% of females. However, only half of violent crimes end up being reported to the police." See here. Sources cited at the bottom of the article. It'll be pretty much the same for any westernised country.
/r/MensRights10/03/23 03:11 PM
14

No, women are less likely to get attacked almost everywhere. They are less likely to be the victim of an assault. They may feel otherwise, but the facts are clear.
/r/MensRights10/03/23 03:05 PM
9

some don't have any rights at all Which countries?
/r/MensRights10/03/23 03:04 PM
11

Which nations? Are you just talking about places where there are strict gender roles? If so, you are right: it is possible to selectively find male privileges. But even so, you should probably quote chapter and verse here.
/r/MensRights10/03/23 03:03 PM
6

I disagree with the idea that rights should come without the concomitant responsibilities. And you also disagree that women should have the rights to vote, have well paying jobs, work in and attend college, and own their own property after marriage? If they pay their own income tax, do national service the same as men, have the same responsibilities to support her husband as he does her...Quite a lot of responsibilities and, far from what the witches of Senecca would claim, most women were happy…
/r/MensRights10/03/23 04:31 AM
10

No, marriage was a means of avoiding having to earn their own money. You've got it the wrong way round. Couverture was the fact of the woman being "covered" by the man; protected and provided for. His expense, her benefit. The ONLY point being made in the document was, as the word "sentiments" suggests, "We hate men."
/r/MensRights10/03/23 03:18 AM
7

Married women gave up...ownership of property" No, they gave up responsibility for it. They were entitled to support from their husbands and, if they divorced, got a deal that very much favoured them. He was responsible for her income tax, though she was not obliged to tell him how much she was making. If they gave up so much, why were they always so keen to get married, and make no mistake, they were?
/r/MensRights10/03/23 02:59 AM
1

I would get a lawyer to write a cease and desist letter.
/r/MensRights07/03/23 03:54 AM
2

Do something you are passionate about. It's the only way not to be a wage slave.
/r/MensRights06/03/23 04:52 AM
13

This would upset the apple cart in determining who the real father is. It would reduce the rate of paternity fraud significantly. Especially if we brought shame back.
/r/MensRights05/03/23 03:27 AM
23

Women are most affected by suicide. They lose their husbands, brothers, sons...
/r/MensRights04/03/23 09:29 AM
4

Or they counter it by putting their hands over their ears and shouting "I can't hear you!"
/r/MensRights04/03/23 09:27 AM
2

It has always been controlled by radicals and was considered as such by mainstream society even in the early days.
/r/MensRights04/03/23 09:09 AM
2

How can equality be radical? It doesn't make sense.
/r/MensRights04/03/23 09:08 AM
11

The difference between flirting and harassment? Whether it's Chad or Joe Nobody doing it. And what kind of mood she is in.
/r/MensRights03/03/23 08:29 AM
8

They are also guilty of at least one property offence.
/r/MensRights02/03/23 06:24 AM
3

Tell the school, in writing, that they are liable for what appears on their toilet wall and demand its immediate removal.
/r/MensRights02/03/23 06:23 AM
12

Paul Elam: "It has not been established that I have a daughter." That is crucial to the whole debate as he was refused a DNA test. That having been said, he is not the face or heart of the Men's Rights Movement and he is not a good representative of us.
/r/MensRights01/03/23 08:25 AM
1

Do you really think she will?
/r/MensRights01/03/23 06:40 AM
2

You said: Or how often pain meds are prescribed for the same conditions. and: And this is for the SAME condition. The research said: Men and women had similar mean pain scores Not the same conditions, the same self-assessed pain evaluation. The research concluded that: Gender bias is a possible explanation for oligoanalgesia in women who present to the ED with acute abdominal pain. It did not explain why this only applies to opiates. If gender bias were the reason, we would expect it to apply to…
/r/MensRights01/03/23 06:38 AM
6

How would you explain that for the same diseases, pain meds are prescribed less to women? Can we see the evidence?
/r/MensRights28/02/23 09:25 PM
11

It's the Labour Party, they have difficulty tying their shoe laces.
/r/MensRights28/02/23 07:24 AM
5

The World Labour Party
/r/MensRights28/02/23 07:23 AM
1

The adjective cis is usually followed by an accusation of privilege, which is its function. Far from me stigmatizing anyone, it is a lobby group trying to gain leverage with this artificial nomenclature.
/r/MensRights28/02/23 01:41 AM
7

transmasc?
/r/MensRights27/02/23 11:34 AM
31

No, we are not all normal, otherwise there would be no use for the word. "Cis" is a politically twisted word, inaccurately borrowed from organic chemistry whose function is to marginalise normal people.
/r/MensRights27/02/23 11:33 AM
56

cis normal man Don't buy into the twisted language of ideologues.
/r/MensRights27/02/23 11:09 AM
1

My anti-virus told me it had prevented a download I hadn't asked for when I clicked this link..
/r/MensRights27/02/23 08:30 AM
1

The flood story predates its appearance in the Bible by at least 900 years. A version can be found in The Epic of Gilgamesh going back to 1900 B.C. The Jewish god, which later became the Christian god, was one of many in ancient Mesopotamia.
/r/MensRights27/02/23 08:13 AM
1

The Surrendered Wife by Laura Doyle
/r/MensRights27/02/23 04:22 AM
0

And karma will bite her on the backside, sooner or later.
/r/MensRights26/02/23 09:27 PM
-1

This is not misogyny, it is simply what the evidence indicates.
/r/MensRights26/02/23 09:25 PM
1

The evidence feminists present trying to argue the existence of discrimination actually points to women not being good at business.
/r/MensRights26/02/23 09:25 PM
8

The linked video isn't available anymore.
/r/MensRights26/02/23 11:04 AM
47

Because those companies would go broke.
/r/MensRights26/02/23 10:49 AM
3

Do you have another explanation?
/r/MensRights26/02/23 09:21 AM
5

And increased the tax base.
/r/MensRights26/02/23 09:11 AM
20

"all men do is lie" He says, trying to present himself as the exception, while showing himself to be disingenuous and dishonest.
/r/MensRights26/02/23 08:55 AM
1

The term "faggot" originally meant a bundle of small sticks used to kindle a fire. In the dark past, homosexuals could be burnt at the stake and thus the word, which is also slang for a cigarette came to mean one of them.
/r/MensRights26/02/23 07:07 AM
1

Thank you.
/r/MensRights26/02/23 05:19 AM
9

My view is that the difference in the three Abrahamic religions are their methods of reproduction. Judaism reproduces itself by being attached to a race and passes itself along with that race, Christianity reproduces itself by conversion and Islam reproduces itself by conquest. Many of the characteristics of the religious expression of the three creeds follow on from the reproductive strategies.
/r/MensRights26/02/23 01:34 AM
7

At the same time as allowing the culture of bacha bazi, dancing boys. There's no bigger hypocrite than a religious hypocrite.
/r/MensRights26/02/23 01:09 AM
1

Women and men are innately equal in intelligence Evidence? Edit: previously, you were wondering if " it's because there are way less female competing than men so statistically the chances also drop" but now you state it as a certainty. What has changed?
/r/MensRights26/02/23 12:14 AM
1

No. Men are inherently better at chess than women because we have better, less emotional, logic. Additionally, men have better spatial judgement, very useful in assessing chess positions. As with most things, men are more driven and therefore achieve higher success. And finally, the brain, approx 2% of the body consumes nearly 1/5 of the calories. Extended intense brain use, as happens in top level chess, gives men a considerable metabolic advantage. I always figured men and women are innately e…
/r/MensRights24/02/23 04:42 PM
2

A truly wise response.
/r/MensRights24/02/23 02:15 PM
0

France is one.
/r/MensRights24/02/23 02:03 PM
27

Get off Tik Tok, it is harmful.
/r/MensRights24/02/23 01:07 PM
3

Any Personchester United fans here?
/r/MensRights24/02/23 11:49 AM
2

women have always had the upper hand. their victimhood is a fabrication.
/r/MensRights24/02/23 11:46 AM
11

Possibly leaving the man with only one option: murder.
/r/MensRights22/02/23 11:32 PM
5

Keep your options open. E.g. prepare to divorce in such a way that she is left financially supporting you. You might need to take legal advice on how to prepare this, but you need to be ready for her to divorce you without letting her walk all over you.
/r/MensRights22/02/23 11:30 PM
2

Domestic abusers without conviction = alleged domestic abusers.
/r/MensRights22/02/23 02:50 PM
1

The Catholic church's historical reaction to what they considered heresy looks to be a lot like where cancel culture is going.
/r/MensRights22/02/23 02:41 PM
4

This doesn't answer my question.
/r/MensRights22/02/23 04:59 AM
21

primary victim accuser Fixed it.
/r/MensRights22/02/23 04:58 AM
5

Talk about them then.
/r/MensRights22/02/23 03:46 AM
13

what could have actually been wrong with the man And what could that have been? You talk of missing out important information, but you are making allusions to something totally undefined here.
/r/MensRights22/02/23 03:46 AM
3

This is unbelievable, but other people's foolishness is not your responsibility. Focus on the things that are within your control.
/r/MensRights22/02/23 02:20 AM
2

Self-reported
/r/MensRights21/02/23 11:14 PM
5

Do you have evidence that it is?
/r/MensRights21/02/23 02:43 PM
11

Forthcoming law: if you lie about your income and have sex, it will be treated as rape.
/r/MensRights20/02/23 10:51 PM
-1

The new Hugo Schwyzer.
/r/MensRights20/02/23 07:10 AM
3

Simple evolutionary explanation.....fast blooming young men got killed cause they were threats but were inexperienced. When you say "simple"....?
/r/MensRights19/02/23 01:10 PM
2

Not as bad as cutting off a healthy part of a newborn baby's penis, for which there is no defense.
/r/MensRights19/02/23 10:52 AM
3

Coming soon: "They're discriminating against us by not hiring women!"
/r/MensRights17/02/23 01:25 AM
30

when we post about things feminists do that we don’t like, and that’s it, and it just becomes a “woman bad” thread You seem to have conflated women with feminism. That's like conflating working people with communism.
/r/MensRights16/02/23 12:21 PM
2

"I want my kids to have blue eyes, not my dull brown eyes." The gene for blue eyes is recessive, so if you don't already have a recessive blue eye gene, your chances of blue-eyed children are zero. "I want my kids to have blue eyes, not my dull brown eyes." The gene for blonde hair is recessive to most darker colours. However, it seems that the gene for idiocy is dominant.
/r/MensRights16/02/23 08:00 AM
10

Too much to list. Off the top of my head; grants and privileges with respect to university intake, attempts to suppress the non-existent pay-gap, preferential hiring, pension age being the same, although women live longer, biased promotions policies, bias in the divorce courts, the woman's right to choose with the man's obligation to pay...
/r/MensRights14/02/23 11:19 AM
30

They say the two things can't be compared, but strangely, if you talk about male circumcision, they always bring up the thing it can't be compared to.
/r/MensRights14/02/23 10:24 AM
3

This is not a true or fair representation of her position.
/r/MensRights14/02/23 06:50 AM
1

No, I am educated enough to know what the word "literally" means.
/r/MensRights13/02/23 09:14 PM
1

It's still a serious defamation.
/r/MensRights13/02/23 12:45 PM
1

the one about jews is is false. A false accusation then.
/r/MensRights13/02/23 08:43 AM
7

I mainly remember people saying things like "as a mother, activist, artist and poet, I refuse to be labelled."
/r/MensRights13/02/23 08:15 AM
0

I am ignorant of what you think a fascist is. A literal fascist would be a member of the Fascist Party, which she is not. So what do you mean? She is also, arguably, the most popular prime minister in Europe at the moment. Why do you think that is?
/r/MensRights13/02/23 08:11 AM
1

Obviously. /s
/r/MensRights13/02/23 06:22 AM
3

What do you mean by "fascist"?
/r/MensRights12/02/23 09:28 PM
2

What do you mean by "fascist".
/r/MensRights12/02/23 09:25 PM
3

She defend the family and marriage as the only purpose of the human being No, she doesn't.
/r/MensRights12/02/23 09:23 PM
4

Can you find evidence for her supporting a policy of gassing Jews?
/r/MensRights12/02/23 10:31 AM
5

Because she is right. Not far right, just right.
/r/MensRights12/02/23 07:30 AM
4

Is murder worse than rape? If you have undergone both procedures, you may have an opinion.
/r/MensRights12/02/23 07:29 AM
3

I would add that this is a parody of mutilation apologists who say that the pain inflicted on neonates is unimportant because they don't remember it.
/r/MensRights12/02/23 05:14 AM
11

I don't think he was. And he is right. He forgot to mention that if you are raped you don't have to come up with justifications as to why it was alright, whereas a lot of circumcision victims apparently feel they have to.
/r/MensRights12/02/23 12:31 AM
9

If you're raped at 8 days old, you won't remember it, so it doesn't matter. /s
/r/MensRights12/02/23 12:14 AM
8

Some of the hospital staff are though.
/r/MensRights11/02/23 11:54 PM
6

The fact is that circumcision has proven benefits Profit for those doing it. It's far worse than rape. It is a sexual assault. It doesn't have to be done early or at all. It can, and does, result in death in neotnates, it's not just excess skin.
/r/MensRights11/02/23 11:54 PM
13

General relativity doesn't make sense to most people, but it appears to be largely correct.
/r/MensRights11/02/23 02:06 PM
4

Circumcision is worse than rape.
/r/MensRights11/02/23 11:08 AM
3

I would use a third party, preferably a male, to take the information for you without letting it appear that it is coming at your behest.
/r/MensRights11/02/23 08:05 AM
1

If you're going to do anything about it, keep records of exact comments over a long period of time with times and dates. If you do choose to go to HR, do it in the following manner: start by asking what their policy is, then get more specific as to how it would apply under certain circumstances. Have all the dominoes lined up to show 1. that she has repeatedly contravened the policy and 2. that they are committed to acting on all such behaviour with a zero tolerance policy. Meanwhile, keep on go…
/r/MensRights09/02/23 11:37 PM
3

Lasting longer? That's like saying a walk in the park is enjoyable, so it is better for people who limp because it lasts longer.
/r/MensRights09/02/23 11:09 PM
5

Source? And why is there no statistical link between overall rates of HIV in societies and circumcision in those societies?
/r/MensRights09/02/23 11:08 PM
16

Why don't you make such a post?
/r/MensRights09/02/23 03:46 PM
4

Manifestly, yes.
/r/MensRights09/02/23 03:06 PM
7

They're also planning to put more of their driving licences in the pink christmas crackers and fewer in the blue ones.
/r/MensRights09/02/23 02:37 PM
1

No, that includes jaywalking, there is no specific word for walking legally.
/r/MensRights09/02/23 02:49 AM
3

Perhaps it's like there is a word for walking in contravention of the rules (jaywalking) but there isn't a word for walking legally. We only need words for things that are not the norm.
/r/MensRights08/02/23 11:30 PM
15

I bet they're not trying to make the Satan genderless though.
/r/MensRights08/02/23 03:12 PM
3

Women have less opportunities in Africa As do men
/r/MensRights07/02/23 02:25 PM
5

she was nothing but comforting I cried in front of a woman once and she was super-sympathetic, so I asked her to go to bed with me. She just laughed and never spoke to me again. Made up story, but you get the point.
/r/MensRights07/02/23 01:39 PM
6

I was going to ask who you were talking about, since this is one of the few things I have watched on the Evil Eye, but then I realised you were talking about the caricature psychologist and his misunderstanding of PUA. He and his friends were not MRAs.
/r/MensRights07/02/23 01:35 PM
1

Only if you let yourself be.
/r/MensRights05/02/23 09:10 PM
4

If you have looked after yourself and your career, your sexual market value is still rising and will continue to do so for years. Read Rollo Tomassi's The Rational Male vol.1 for more information.
/r/MensRights05/02/23 12:07 PM
1

A joke is not the real thing. Trying to repress humour is the action of control freaks and should be resisted.
/r/MensRights05/02/23 01:50 AM
1

Don't most gyms have a "no recording devices" policy? Using one and then publishing it should result in a ban for the person doing it.
/r/MensRights05/02/23 12:19 AM
0

No, there isn't.
/r/MensRights05/02/23 12:15 AM
0

If the Bible had been true, its author, alleged to be God, would have had a better understanding of cosmology.
/r/MensRights04/02/23 11:56 PM
1

It is absurd. Sexuality evolved long before convictions and philosophy. It may be influenced by them, but it is not the result of them.
/r/MensRights04/02/23 11:51 PM
2

In another post, she says she is looking at the possibility of moving to Georgia as a tax haven. It is of course possible to have a child at 15 and reach tax exile status in 9 years, but it seems unlikely. Additionally, nearly all EU countries allow abortion on request and those that don't allow a broad range of reasons to qualify. Exceptions are Andorra, Malta and Vatican City. Given that the EU permits free movement between countries, it is a simple matter to go to another country especially f…
/r/MensRights04/02/23 12:18 AM
2

Or perhaps for making relationships dysfunctional, or not putting them right or ending marriages for silly reasons, like all her friends are doing it. Or because she suddenly thinks she has other options.
/r/MensRights03/02/23 02:03 PM
8

You make 400K a year and you are asking for legal advice here?!!!. See a lawyer.
/r/MensRights03/02/23 03:17 AM
5

This requires more detail.
/r/MensRights03/02/23 12:24 AM
3

The slowness of the legal systems and the three month time span for changing gender means that men charged with crimes will have the opportunity to change gender and try for a pussy pass.
/r/MensRights01/02/23 11:59 PM
2

Fgm never claimed to have health benefits Not true It's only done to older girls, Not true Everything else in favor of FGM included social norms,small religious sects, and male pleasure Like MGM then except for switching the genders. The arguments are exactly the same.
/r/MensRights01/02/23 04:48 AM
1

It causes great pain, has huge risks, removes sensation, causes permanent damage and takes away bodily autonomy. It is exactly the same as fgm which also has claimed benefits.
/r/MensRights01/02/23 04:19 AM
1

They are not unbiased. They make huge profits from both the mutilation and dealing with the problems it causes.
/r/MensRights01/02/23 04:18 AM
1

Circumcising babies IS evil.
/r/MensRights01/02/23 03:39 AM
1

It's been researched by unbiased groups for longer than anyone's been alive, and none have found such a suggestion to be true. Who?
/r/MensRights01/02/23 03:39 AM
1

you don't remember anything about the procedure. Circumcision permanently alters the brain
/r/MensRights01/02/23 03:18 AM
3

I don't have to pull skin to clean the penis. Hardly worth mentioning. Decreased risks of UTI's. Less risk of certain STD's, I'd argue less pain with certain ones as well due to the way foreskin works. All of this is highly debateable, there are numerous risks associated with circumcision that you do not mention, e.g. meatal stenosis. If we had been better off without foreskins, evolution would have done away with them.
/r/MensRights01/02/23 03:15 AM
1

What exactly are these benefits?
/r/MensRights01/02/23 02:33 AM
5

Also, for criminals, your wife cannot be subpoenaed to testify against you.
/r/MensRights30/01/23 11:47 PM
1

What exactly are you doing?
/r/MensRights30/01/23 12:04 AM
2

The Bible is a collection of pre-scientific writings, many based on earlier texts from Assyria and Mesopotamia, often by people who were barking mad and full of demonstrable falsehoods. Basing anything on it is foolish.
/r/MensRights29/01/23 10:15 AM
9

I myself am a super attractive man. As a feminist, this causes a problem. The fact that women cannot resist me also means that they cannot truly consent, so if I ever have sex, it must be rape.
/r/MensRights28/01/23 09:42 AM
1

Can I ask a few questions? You didn't wait for an answer.
/r/MensRights28/01/23 08:24 AM
5

Research done by Sykes and Gilding, using genetic markers over centuries delivers a figure of 1.4%. This figure includes adoptions.
/r/MensRights28/01/23 05:42 AM
1

Anything worth saying is worth disagreeing with. No, it isn't.
/r/MensRights27/01/23 06:43 AM
0

Simply look at personal ads to see how absurd women's expectations are: "I am a princess and expect to be treated like one" followed by a long list of requirements. Compare them to men's ads, they are totally different. I think you misunderstand the significance of the 49% and 51% figures you quoted. They merely indicate that the study selected an almost even number of subjects for analysis. Your comment should say 93 not 39.
/r/MensRights26/01/23 01:20 AM
0

Because they have unrealistic expectations.
/r/MensRights26/01/23 12:51 AM
1

No, this is a very one-sided matter in modern times.
/r/MensRights24/01/23 09:00 PM
0

Women's expectations have become unrealistic and unreasonable. This harms everyone, not the least individual women who overvalue themselves.
/r/MensRights24/01/23 09:31 AM
1

Yes
/r/MensRights22/01/23 02:29 AM
1

From the Rape Abuse Incest National Network. Is there a reason you would believe their "research" which is actually not research but advocacy?
/r/MensRights22/01/23 02:07 AM
2

Even if it is true, it is a red flag that she discusses it with her staff and a second red flag that she named the accused. Does she have enough evidence to stand up in court? If yes, why has she not taken it to the appropriate authorities, if no, why is she making these accusations at all? These are not matters for work.
/r/MensRights22/01/23 01:33 AM
10

I recommend the videos of Dr. Ramani on this subject.
/r/MensRights21/01/23 01:11 AM
1

"Find me a female only commune that has survived more than a generation, religious orders excluded."
/r/MensRights20/01/23 11:51 PM
23

The trick is to help your client see what's really going on, You have to know it first. The attempt of the College of Psychologists of Ontario to force Jordan Peterson into a re-education programme, suggests very strongly that there is at least some agenda in the industry and that said agenda is left-wing and woke.
/r/MensRights20/01/23 11:41 PM
2

Sir, I'm also an Aussie but I smuggled my good British manners in with me. I think early feminism was privileged white women doing the bidding for governments who wanted women to get out of the home to do taxable work. Currently, it's still privileged white women, but they are doing the bidding for world government which sees crushing men as a means of destroying opposition to their domination.
/r/MensRights20/01/23 10:56 AM
1

That's pretty much what the court said if I remember correctly, it was a long time ago.
/r/MensRights20/01/23 10:53 AM
5

There actually was a prostitute in England who argued in court that if she paid taxes the Inland Revenue would be living off immoral earnings.
/r/MensRights20/01/23 08:47 AM
1

What was it designed to do? Who designed it?
/r/MensRights20/01/23 08:23 AM
76

The wars were terrible for women. They had to start doing the jobs men normally did.
/r/MensRights19/01/23 09:26 PM
2

My view is that the only job of the judiciary is to protect society. Sanctions should not judge moral wrongness, but should apply the most effective penalties to protect society. Thus a calculated crime, such as embezzlement or managing a crime syndicate needs to attract a penalty large enough to dissuade the perpetrator from committing the act. The penalty needs to be proportionally higher, the lower the chance of getting caught is. This is not a reflection of how evil a particular crime is, bu…
/r/MensRights19/01/23 08:16 AM
3

Is marriage necessary for any of that?
/r/MensRights19/01/23 06:37 AM
2

Principals. And no, they don't run the school, they follow programmes and regulations that are handed to them.
/r/MensRights18/01/23 11:19 AM
4

What do you mean they had no autonomy? Was that by law? If so, which law(s) are you referring to?
/r/MensRights18/01/23 11:16 AM
1

One more and it's a full coven.
/r/MensRights18/01/23 08:02 AM
4

I think it is genuine.
/r/MensRights18/01/23 07:10 AM
1

Many modern Jews insist on following a great many alleged commandments, even the very harmful ones such as circumcision, but they very rarely insist that false accusers suffer the punishment the accused would have got. It is right there in the Bible. Deuteronomy 19 (note particularly verse 19) says: If a false witness rise up against any man to testify against him that which is wrong; 17 Then both the men, between whom the controversy is, shall stand before the Lord, before the priests and the j…
/r/MensRights18/01/23 07:09 AM
0

This is very sad but anyone who could not see, and the picture alone should give it away, that this woman is Trouble is going to have problems.
/r/MensRights18/01/23 06:55 AM
4

Three things: 1. Do not talk to the police without a lawyer, 2. Do not talk to the police without a lawyer and 3. Do not talk to the police without a lawyer.
/r/MensRights18/01/23 06:44 AM
1

She seems to have borrowed Greta Thunberg's voice.
/r/MensRights18/01/23 06:40 AM
2

And, unless she has taken her mother's name and her mother has taken her own mother's name etc., then there is no female lineage anyway.
/r/MensRights18/01/23 06:32 AM
4

Where did you see this evidence?
/r/MensRights18/01/23 06:30 AM
22

Can you give me a reason for a man to get married?
/r/MensRights18/01/23 06:29 AM
8

I know what women went through. Women have always been privileged w.r.t. men. Feminism has always been a fraud.
/r/MensRights18/01/23 06:27 AM
9

The problem is that if it drives you into negative karma and you cannot pay, karma debt collectors will be round to your home. They are a vicious lot, but for a small fee, I will be able to deal with them for you.
/r/MensRights17/01/23 05:37 AM
25

Can one person go into another's history and downvote every post that they ever made? Yes, it's a poor reflection on them.
/r/MensRights17/01/23 04:37 AM
2

Just don't use Google. Or talk about "googling"; "do a websearch" is a perfectly alternative. You are wasting your time on this, Google are actively and deliberately anti-male. The next battleground is the manipulation of AI and chatbots such as ChatGPT. Google is undoubtedly working on making chatbots with their own feminist dogma. It looks like things are about to get very much like Orwell's 1984 except it will not be Big Brother watching, it will be Big Sister. The war in Ukraine seems to be …
/r/MensRights17/01/23 02:35 AM
1

Except it hasn't done it to me. I learned redpill in the 1980s before it was a thing and have done very well out of the very twisted gender situation.
/r/MensRights17/01/23 01:59 AM
3

They can play when they stop demanding that they are subsidised by the men's game. I think it's funny.
/r/MensRights17/01/23 01:57 AM
41

Now they need to abolish gender categories in sport. Edit: For those who watch soccer on video, there is no need for women's soccer. All you have to do is watch a man's game at half speed and it's almost the same thing.
/r/MensRights16/01/23 10:12 AM
1

It's biology. Learn redpill game and use it to your advantage.
/r/MensRights15/01/23 05:41 AM
3

There's even a word for it: transmaxing.
/r/MensRights15/01/23 05:34 AM
2

All this anti-male propaganda merely makes women into children. Perhaps they should not go out unaccompanied.
/r/MensRights15/01/23 01:17 AM
4

"We"?
/r/MensRights15/01/23 12:39 AM
1

In the Jewish tradition, it was a symbol of slavery; slaves were circumcised and, like babies, had no choice in the matter. The alleged "covenant with God" symbolises submission to the imaginary being.
/r/MensRights15/01/23 12:31 AM
2

Can you link to anyone saying "you're fucked if you're circumcised"? I don't remember ever seeing such a thing here. As for the rest of your rant, most of the debates focus on freedom of choice, not "cut is bad." You seem to be in denial of the harm that has been done, and are stating made up facts to justify that denial. It is not people who have been circumcised who are fucked up freaks, it's those who think it's alright to do it to babies.
/r/MensRights15/01/23 12:29 AM
3

it will really make dating hard If you find you cannot have relationships without involving your wealth, you have work to do. Also the whole idea of dating is idiotic and set up for the benefit of women. Friends with benefits is an option these days, thanks feminism!
/r/MensRights14/01/23 12:36 PM
1

There should be a warning on Tiktok links.
/r/MensRights14/01/23 07:49 AM
13

Never let women know that you have got money. If they don't want you without it, they can't have you with it. And if you get married, it becomes theirs anyway, so down goes the attraction back to base levels.
/r/MensRights14/01/23 01:55 AM
1

Because the new vocabulary is aimed not at truth but at pushing a sly agenda.
/r/MensRights13/01/23 09:12 AM
1

Did she choose the wrong partner? Or was she a part of the split? Unless he died, it's one or the other.
/r/MensRights13/01/23 02:42 AM
1

No, the problem is in allowing themselves to become single mothers in the first place.
/r/MensRights13/01/23 12:14 AM
51

As usual, it's projection, they should be called "Are we the same woman?"
/r/MensRights13/01/23 12:02 AM
1

The comparison is between single mothers and whole families. The difference is enormous.
/r/MensRights13/01/23 12:01 AM
-1

Cisgender: straight, normal Heteronormative: traditional, established, normal
/r/MensRights12/01/23 11:59 PM
1

No, I'm not generalisng millions of women. The statitistics are absolutely crystal clear. Excluded dads are far more common than deadbeats.
/r/MensRights12/01/23 11:56 PM
51

I'm expecting a flood of others before they change the law.
/r/MensRights12/01/23 02:53 PM
-3

They do it badly. Children of single mothers are at high risk for everything bad and have low chances for good things.
/r/MensRights12/01/23 02:29 PM
4

Don't buy into manipulative words e.g. heteronormative, cis-gender. Traditional words exist for these things.
/r/MensRights12/01/23 02:23 PM
4

She is a dyed-in-the-wool narcissist whose modus operandi is cynical manipluation. I suggest you look at some of Dr Ramani's videos and other related material to learn how to deal with such people. You will also need to start doing some personal development to learn assertive behaviours.
/r/MensRights11/01/23 11:55 PM
1

Allegedly raped the girl. Fixed it.
/r/MensRights11/01/23 03:05 PM
1

And Hungary creates a new scam: maternity fraud.
/r/MensRights11/01/23 02:23 PM
1

You should put this comment directly under sea_tour's post, so he will read it.
/r/MensRights11/01/23 02:21 PM
7

Male SMV is strongly dependent on income, female SMV is not. Thus men are more motivated to take higher paying jobs regardless of the sacrifices needed while women focus on job satisfaction. This is the entire reason for the earnings gap.
/r/MensRights08/01/23 11:58 PM
23

It seems we all originated from Africa.
/r/MensRights08/01/23 11:16 PM
72

There is no need to legislate for diversity if it will improve performance. The market will see to it that more diverse firms will prosper and that firms will select diverse boards to take advantage of that principle. OR Gender diversity does not improve organisational performance.
/r/MensRights08/01/23 07:44 AM
1

It might be a good idea to tell us who Mark Koss is. That way your post might make sense to someone who doesn't already know.
/r/MensRights07/01/23 11:02 PM
1

No, I'm not. I'm comparing the most common form of fgm with the most common form of mgm.
/r/MensRights07/01/23 10:53 PM
1

Yes, FGM is practised in Yemen.
/r/MensRights07/01/23 11:11 AM
2

Tell your former best friend to keep an open mind. He will work things out for himself soon enough.
/r/MensRights07/01/23 07:59 AM
17

And bias in marking.
/r/MensRights07/01/23 07:55 AM
11

when it's blandly obvious. It's not obvious. Removal of the clitoris destroys 10,281 nerve fibres. Male circumcision destroys more than 20,000.
/r/MensRights07/01/23 04:12 AM
5

There should be a flair which mods could add "tone policing."
/r/MensRights07/01/23 03:55 AM
4

Feminism is the fight for women's equality with men. Based on the incorrect assumption that men are privileged over women.
/r/MensRights07/01/23 03:10 AM
1

The giveaways as to why this is probably fiction, some of which relate to OP's posting history, are in the comments on the original site.
/r/MensRights07/01/23 03:08 AM
1

I suspect this is fiction.
/r/MensRights07/01/23 01:50 AM
11

Or maybe after a few simple questions, the accusation falls apart and the accuser is allowed to go without being charged.
/r/MensRights07/01/23 12:19 AM
11

It doesn't interfere with it for you perhaps, but that does not prove it in all cases. Neither can you really be sure even in your own case since, as you point out, you have no conscious memories of either the process or the foreskin itself. Obviously circumcision does remove sensation since it requires the cutting of 20 000 nerves. To deny that is to refuse observable reality.
/r/MensRights07/01/23 12:03 AM
1

Yemen would be one example.
/r/MensRights06/01/23 11:55 PM
42

Because he's buying into the "females have it worse" whataboutism.
/r/MensRights06/01/23 11:54 PM
17

There are millions of circumcised men who have no problem masturbating or having sex That doesn't mean that circumcision does not interfere with it. they can't form memories there's no problem with it The failure to form conscious memories does not mean that the event does not have an effect. The neural development can be de-railed by such torture and there is evidence that babies who suffered this abuse are more sensitive to injections received later.
/r/MensRights06/01/23 11:36 PM
16

You're lucky: you have a choice.
/r/MensRights06/01/23 11:11 PM
11

Of course it does, and this has been cited as the justification for inflicting it by among others John Harvey Kellogg: A remedy which is almost always successful in small boys is circumcision, especially when there is any degree of phimosis. The operation should be performed by a surgeon without administering an anesthetic, as the brief pain attending the operation will have a salutary effect upon the mind, especially if it be connected with the idea of punishment, as it may well be in some case…
/r/MensRights06/01/23 11:11 PM
40

Most divorces are initiated by women, and often for very trivial reasons.
/r/MensRights06/01/23 11:19 AM
36

Maybe they shouldn't become single moms then.
/r/MensRights06/01/23 11:08 AM
1

Oh, I thought it meant something like grabbing them by the pussy.
/r/MensRights06/01/23 09:41 AM
2

No, but the women will be twice as far away, which amounts to the same thing.
/r/MensRights06/01/23 09:30 AM
11

I've heard that in future, wars will be fought on separate battlefields, one for women and one for men. The result of the female conflict will not change history and will be fought only with rude words and sulking, but the female soldiers will be paid the same as the men.
/r/MensRights06/01/23 07:15 AM
2

After you "first read it". Not after you replied.
/r/MensRights06/01/23 06:39 AM
2

I did not.
/r/MensRights06/01/23 06:35 AM
2

Well, the idea that women should vote in national elections was universally supported, even amongst women.
/r/MensRights06/01/23 06:28 AM
2

So you're happy to accept a different zeitgeist in other times if it suits your agenda, but not where it doesn't.
/r/MensRights06/01/23 06:21 AM
1

The onus is on you to prove your case.
/r/MensRights06/01/23 06:19 AM
0

No. The Suffragettes were an organisation. Many suffragists were neither supporters nor members.
/r/MensRights05/01/23 09:13 PM
6

Wanting to vote while not wanting to defend the country and handing out white feathers to men to shame them into doing it for you. Yes, that indicates a hate movement. Not to mention the letter bombs and attempted murder.
/r/MensRights05/01/23 09:11 PM
10

India is fucking atrocious for women No, it isn't.
/r/MensRights05/01/23 01:39 PM
8

Learn the art of amused mastery. Practice mansplaining. Be ultra polite and extremely condescending at the same time. See it as a game, all being played for your amusement.
/r/MensRights05/01/23 01:37 PM
12

This is not a rhetorical question. Why are you dating a radfem?
/r/MensRights05/01/23 01:35 PM
14

Yep, that's whataboutism.
/r/MensRights05/01/23 10:52 AM
14

I believe, Sir, that your relating of a Reuters report to free transport for women is a case of whataboutism.
/r/MensRights05/01/23 10:42 AM
1

A PhD student ought to be able to express his thoughts better than this.
/r/MensRights05/01/23 10:30 AM
17

It's the most dangerous place for men too.
/r/MensRights05/01/23 09:42 AM
1

Also, the disabled ones are legally enforceable.
/r/MensRights05/01/23 06:58 AM
13

All of the above except get a new girlfriend. Work on yourself first.
/r/MensRights05/01/23 06:50 AM
7

her last three exes (along with her old best friend) all beat her and sexually assaulted her. She seems to be very unlucky. But then again, given her behaviour towards you, it would be more believable that she abused and assaulted her last three exes.
/r/MensRights05/01/23 06:49 AM
1

Can you clarify what you mean by "snatch up" please?
/r/MensRights05/01/23 06:43 AM
6

As a man, this gives me an advantage. Given that this discrimination is not legally enforceable, I shall ignore it thus making the spaces available for women and men like me who refuse to kowtow to this sort of nonsense, while excluding virtue-signalling men.
/r/MensRights05/01/23 06:30 AM
1

How do men benefit from that?
/r/MensRights05/01/23 06:25 AM
11

It started out as a hate movement.
/r/MensRights05/01/23 06:18 AM
4

The purpose of up and down votes is to say whether the text did or did not add value. If it was a wall of text, a down vote is valid on that basis.
/r/MensRights05/01/23 06:17 AM
9

I agree. Never interrupt a fool, it is much easier than having tell people yourself that he is a fool.
/r/MensRights04/01/23 10:23 AM
3

The elephant in every room: single parent (read mother) families.
/r/MensRights04/01/23 06:35 AM
17

Don't drink more than you can handle.
/r/MensRights03/01/23 12:28 PM
3

The lowest status men also had it better than women before the rise of modern feminism. Evidence?
/r/MensRights03/01/23 10:48 AM
1

I've never heard of this product, but I have absolutely no doubt it will be a waste of your money. If you wish for the sizzle they are trying to sell you, you have to earn it. Look after your skin by eating healthy food.
/r/MensRights02/01/23 12:02 AM
3

That seems to be the case. But you don't need to spend a lot of money on this. A one hour session to take advice should make it worthwhile.
/r/MensRights01/01/23 12:50 PM
5

You should have gone to a lawyer before approaching the police.
/r/MensRights01/01/23 11:20 AM
2

I suspect that lots of her clients also have Munchausen by Proxy.
/r/MensRights01/01/23 04:21 AM
1

Power is derived in lots of ways. Trying to put others down is rarely a good strategy.
/r/MensRights01/01/23 02:23 AM
2

No, he isn't. He's a loser working as a cashier, not doing that job properly and desperately trying to suck up to women, who almost certainly despise him.
/r/MensRights01/01/23 02:21 AM
19

tldr: "I'm better than you"
/r/MensRights31/12/22 07:17 AM
8

Apparently the /s is needed.
/r/MensRights31/12/22 02:48 AM
2

In Britain, they used to be called the Ecology Party, but then the Labour Party had a "witch hunt" to eliminate the far left lunatics that were costing the party the chance of getting elected. Many of these zealots then joined the Ecology Party which was re-branded as the Green Party, but could have been better labelled the Watermelon Party: green on the outside, red on the inside.
/r/MensRights31/12/22 02:25 AM
2

Unreadable because it is lacking paragraph breaks.
/r/MensRights31/12/22 12:27 AM
2

"Sentence first, verdict afterward". This is straight out of Alice In Wonderland.
/r/MensRights30/12/22 02:38 PM
3

If you are knowingly doing something sexual to someone that they don’t want However, the problem is that the "crime" depends entirely on how the "victim" feels about it.
/r/MensRights30/12/22 02:37 PM
1

I repeated a comment a feminist made about how things would have been sorted out if men suffered the consequences, which was, even by feminist standards, so damning about women that repeating it was funny. You should probably take it up with the woman who originally, albeit inadvertently implied that women can't sort out their own problems without male intervention.
/r/MensRights30/12/22 02:17 PM
1

You have provided no evidence for anything; you have merely made judgements and repeated statements. Evidence requires facts. Not feelings, not value judgements, not impressions, just facts. I don't think you have provided a single one.
/r/MensRights30/12/22 02:14 PM
1

Who's being rude now? Not for the first time.
/r/MensRights30/12/22 02:12 PM
1

How awful, I hope there is a fainting couch near.
/r/MensRights30/12/22 02:12 PM
1

I'm not sure what "supporting women's rights" actually means, but most women definitely do not identify as feminists.
/r/MensRights30/12/22 02:12 PM
2

You put down every single acvomplishment by womenn have made and attributed it to men. No, I didn't. You are a misogynist. No, I'm not.
/r/MensRights30/12/22 01:57 PM
1

I have been criticising feminists and asking for evidence that they have done any good, which I have not received. This does not generalise to women, the majority of whom are not feminists.
/r/MensRights30/12/22 01:56 PM
1

I didn't.
/r/MensRights30/12/22 01:55 PM
1

It is foolish to argue with me on a subject you know nothing about and on which I know a great deal, i.e. my relationship with people around me.
/r/MensRights30/12/22 01:55 PM
1

I didn't, I don't and I don't.
/r/MensRights30/12/22 01:54 PM
1

by pretending like no decision they make can ever be their own I didn't
/r/MensRights30/12/22 01:09 PM
2

But it's what will happen because the schools are scared of looking as if they are not doing anything about it.
/r/MensRights30/12/22 01:07 PM
1

What evidence do you have that women are so pathetic they can't decide whether or not they want to follow a stem career?
/r/MensRights30/12/22 01:01 PM
22

Even if this were true, and it isn't, this would still not justify dropping the standards for one gender only. The only purpose of the exam is to assess competence.
/r/MensRights30/12/22 01:00 PM
1

No, I don't accept people's right to divorce if they have children and if they do not, then there is not reason for alimony.
/r/MensRights30/12/22 11:30 AM
1

Probably a bigot.
/r/MensRights30/12/22 11:29 AM
1

How can you hate women so much? I don't hate women. It's probably true that I don't love them as much as they love me, but I can't help that. I guess women have no agency of any kind because you have decided it to be true. I didn't say anything of the sort. What is wrong with you? I'm surrounded by fools.
/r/MensRights30/12/22 10:22 AM
1

I'm not going to because you didn't say "please".
/r/MensRights30/12/22 10:20 AM
2

Feminism and humour don't really go together do they?
/r/MensRights30/12/22 05:28 AM
2

So, would you rather women stay at home with children? On balance, yes. And most women would also choose that. Feminists have worked hard to deny them that option.
/r/MensRights30/12/22 05:27 AM
2

so women can't ever want to do anything positive for themselves Well they prefer to get men to do things for them. As Leah Williamson recently said, using the royal "we": ‘I’m pretty sure if men had periods, we would have figured out a way to stop them by now without doing any damage,’
/r/MensRights30/12/22 05:19 AM
2

I don't actually think she is a troll. I think she has a lot of feelings about "the past" and "other places", about which she knows very little and has merely got these feelings through exposure to various electronic media. She is genuinely nonplussed by having these feelings about what happened "in the past" challenged.
/r/MensRights30/12/22 05:13 AM
3

Who's being rude now?
/r/MensRights30/12/22 05:09 AM
2

Answered above.
/r/MensRights30/12/22 05:08 AM
1

How is financial independence bad? It comes with responsibility. IMO, children are being under-parented these days, which is the cause of a huge raft of social problems. The changes have resulted in the break up of families. What do you think caused women to start working then? Changes in technology coupled with governments wanting to get more tax in.
/r/MensRights30/12/22 05:08 AM
2

Exponentially? So what is exponent and what is its period. Okay so you are using the term exponentially figuratively and not factually, but you have not shown either that this is a good thing or that feminism is responsible for it. You have not produced a single shred of evidence for either thing.
/r/MensRights30/12/22 04:59 AM
3

It wasn't socially acceptable for women to work "Socially acceptable" is not a fact, it is a judgement. They had less schooling. When? Where? Who? This is half a fact. Please look up what COVERTURE is. I know what coverture was. It was the responsibility of a man to support his wife. Far more women work now. But you have not presented any evidence either that 1. This is a good thing or 2. that feminism is responsible for it.
/r/MensRights30/12/22 04:57 AM
2

I have presented plenty of facts. No you haven't I ALREADY MENTIONED COVERTURE. You mentioned the word, but you didn't say anything about it. If you admit something can't be proved, stop demanding proof of it. Make your statements more precise, and then provide some evidence.
/r/MensRights30/12/22 04:51 AM
3

You're just being rude. Perhaps you should read your own comments before saying that. People in the church obviously. Yet another meaningless generalisation. I have presented plenty of facts. You have made a lot of unsupported statements, not facts. Could the evidence be all the women with jobs now? How could I prove that? I don't know, not my problem.
/r/MensRights30/12/22 04:46 AM
2

I'm saying feminism helped make it socially acceptable and considered a normal activity for women married or not. Actually, this is the first time you have said that, but, once again, you produce no evidence. People definitely used to say that women should be submissive in the past. "In the past"; another imprecise statement. "People": who exactly? Perhaps it is the opposite; women made themselves submissive as a way to manipulate the chivalry instinct. You are not proving any statements about w…
/r/MensRights30/12/22 04:38 AM
3

Women have always been able to go to work and control their own money. Your statements are simply untrue. "Not to have to be submissive": a bland generalisation with almost no context and no factual basis. As for school, men have always been legally liable to support their families, a non-reciprocal obligation, which is why they needed school more than women. As for leadership roles, this is the apex fallacy coming into play again. All these points you might have made, but you have not defended …
/r/MensRights30/12/22 04:24 AM
1

Go for it.
/r/MensRights30/12/22 04:18 AM
2

Would you like to identify the oppression you are talking about specifically? I keep asking, but don't actually get a precise answer.
/r/MensRights30/12/22 04:14 AM
1

I checked your profile. I can't find anything where you addressed the matter.
/r/MensRights30/12/22 04:10 AM
2

No, I am saying there were gender roles which were more rigid than now and were still biased in favour of women. The whole "women were repressed in the past" is nonsense; they were protected and provided for.
/r/MensRights30/12/22 04:07 AM
2

You FEEL like it, but you didn't.
/r/MensRights30/12/22 04:05 AM
1

Yes, it's a modern revision of history.
/r/MensRights30/12/22 04:04 AM
2

Women have never been oppressed more than men. Wherever women are badly treated, men are treated worse.
/r/MensRights30/12/22 04:00 AM
1

How?
/r/MensRights30/12/22 04:00 AM
1

It is a hate movement which harms almost everyone, including women.
/r/MensRights30/12/22 03:58 AM
2

Ah yes, here we have the pre-supposition John the Other referred to.
/r/MensRights30/12/22 03:56 AM
3

The "past". That's a long time. When and what precisely are you referring to. "Some places": same question.
/r/MensRights30/12/22 03:51 AM
1

I didn't say they had nothing to do with it, I said they didn't cause it, they merely put an ongoing process in jeopardy by their violence.
/r/MensRights30/12/22 03:49 AM
4

You're still not answering the question.
/r/MensRights30/12/22 03:48 AM
1

Nothing of value, yes. They did, however, invent the letter bomb, attempt to murder Lloyd George, destroy property and generally disgrace the women's suffrage movement.
/r/MensRights30/12/22 03:39 AM
3

”A doctrine built on the pre-supposition of victimhood of women by men as a foundation of female identity. In its goals is always the utilization of the state to forcibly redress this claimed victimization. In other words, the proxy use of violence and wealth appropriation. In whatever flavor, and variation, these two basic features are common to every doctrine using the label feminism. Feminism is therefore, a doctrine of class hatred, and violence.” (John The Other, “Why not date a feminist?” …
/r/MensRights30/12/22 03:38 AM
2

Probably just taking the easiest option.
/r/MensRights30/12/22 03:29 AM
2

Not answering the question there.
/r/MensRights30/12/22 03:28 AM
1

I don't think full female suffrage was helped by the Suffragettes and you should be aware it was not their cause. They only wanted the vote for "ladies of class" but they have been greatly misrepresented.
/r/MensRights30/12/22 03:28 AM
1

Effect. That is the correct word here. The question is not whether they "fought" for it, it is whether their behaviour effected the change. I rather think The Suffragettes put a change that was already in process in jeopardy. they did not cause that change.
/r/MensRights30/12/22 03:21 AM
1

By fighting to enact it But did that fight actually cause it? It is more likely that The Suffragettes were a threat to a process that was already happening. Bringing about equal democracy is good for everyone Evidence? "Everyone" is a tough case to prove.
/r/MensRights30/12/22 03:16 AM
4

If people start redefining words, communication breaks down. No, it doesn't. People do it all the time, hence the expression "living language." Why do you have a problem with dictionaries? I don't, I have a problem with using a definition found in a dictionary as evidence about the nature of a political movement. the dictionary typically does define words based on how people use them Apparently, you know how to use a dictionary. Use one to find the meaning of "typically". But the dictionary defi…
/r/MensRights30/12/22 03:12 AM
2

No, it's not confusing. You simply seem to believe in some sort of higher authority which has the sole right to determine what words mean regardless of what they mean in real life and that said authority controls all dictionaries. In reality, as implied by its name, feminism is not a movement for equality.
/r/MensRights30/12/22 02:14 AM
2

How did feminism effect women's suffrage? You also didn't answer the question of how women's suffrage helped both sexes (are there only two?).
/r/MensRights30/12/22 02:04 AM
3

"The" dictionary?
/r/MensRights30/12/22 02:02 AM
3

the feminist movement was directly responsible for women gaining the right to vote. Do you have any evidence for that? Or are you just saying what you like about history?
/r/MensRights30/12/22 01:41 AM
1

And assuming feminists had anything to do with that.
/r/MensRights30/12/22 01:40 AM
3

You didn't answer the question.
/r/MensRights30/12/22 01:39 AM
4

The way the Party defines them is the only way. /s
/r/MensRights30/12/22 01:38 AM
6

It's actually quite sad how rare we are.
/r/MensRights30/12/22 01:35 AM
5

"As a strong independent woman, I am a weak dependent woman"
/r/MensRights30/12/22 01:29 AM
5

Because women aren't allowed to under the rules of the patriarchy.
/r/MensRights30/12/22 01:22 AM
2

And she has no idea of this blindingly obvious implication.
/r/MensRights30/12/22 01:21 AM
4

the trash took itself out Brilliant!
/r/MensRights28/12/22 11:50 PM
5

If people were self-reliant, counsellors would lose business.
/r/MensRights28/12/22 11:45 PM
2

"Where do you want to eat?" Mcdonalds Why the Hell does anyone eat there?
/r/MensRights28/12/22 11:43 PM
2

Indeed I was.
/r/MensRights28/12/22 02:40 PM
1

Again, not a true and fair representation of the situation.
/r/MensRights28/12/22 02:39 PM
1

None of this is a true and fair representation of the situation, even if some of it is technically true.
/r/MensRights28/12/22 02:37 PM
7

You should also note that Afghanistan is not usually considered a part of the Middle East and does not justify your previous statement for that reason alone.
/r/MensRights28/12/22 04:54 AM
-6

They are the majority of students, they have special rights to protection and support, they cannot be genitally mutilated.
/r/MensRights28/12/22 03:34 AM
15

The reason women can't go to school is that men, who by law are responsible for doing all work outside the home and supporting their families/wives who do not have a reciprocal obligation, need education to do so. It is not a good system, but it is no better for men than it is for women. See Karen Straughan's video When Female Privilege Backfires for a better picture of how gender relations work in places with strict gender rolsesl
/r/MensRights28/12/22 03:33 AM
15

middle eastern countries are failing women This is not true. Wherever women are treated badly, men are treated worse. Or perhaps you would like to produce some hard evidence here.
/r/MensRights28/12/22 02:45 AM
2

And precisely what happened there?
/r/MensRights28/12/22 02:29 AM
5

Not a precise time, not a precise place, not a fact.
/r/MensRights28/12/22 01:29 AM
5

And also stop taking the drugs. And doing unprotected one-night stands.
/r/MensRights28/12/22 12:37 AM
2

When, exactly?
/r/MensRights28/12/22 12:35 AM
-1

All of this is pretty normal. Not that bad. You need to be there for them and, if you are, you should demand the baby has your name. Suggesting not giving it your name may be, in her mind, a sort of shit test to see how invested you are. She is simply overwhelmed and uncertain. What she needs is some kind of leadership and solidity from you.
/r/MensRights28/12/22 12:13 AM
13

I would apologise and explain it with something along the lines of "I didn't feel comfortable with your daughter's sweater which I took to be a deliberate attempt to stir up controversy, something I don't wish to engage in, so we just left as unobtrusively as possible." Thereafter, do not engage in further debate, maybe by saying something like "as I said, I don't want to engage in controversy." Ultimately, you are not in control of their behaviour, only your own.
/r/MensRights27/12/22 01:18 AM
8

The word has changed its meaning. Originally, it was used by black activists to mean aware of discrimination, but being an implied claim of special virtue, it became a tool of virtue signallers and thence a term of abuse for people trying to signal that their opinions were superior to others. That is a very common use of the word nowadays.
/r/MensRights27/12/22 12:48 AM
3

Iron John by Robert Bly.
/r/MensRights27/12/22 12:26 AM
3

I'm basically saying that no woman will ever love me enough to have sex with me and that I have to pay for something that most other men can get for free Not true, it doesn't amount to that. It's getting started with change. And if you don't feel good about it afterwards, try something else. Get started with this. And then get to work on yourself. I'm going to make a main post of working on yourself right now. Think of that post as my answer to your post here. It's for you. Edit: Here is that po…
/r/MensRights27/12/22 12:11 AM
1

Yes, it will. It will help you with all your problems.
/r/MensRights27/12/22 12:05 AM
2

sexual encounters are much more risky for women than for men. Women risk pregnancy, which is an enormous life changing commitment, whereas men risk wasting an hour on a subpar encounter. As a result, women are inclined to feel more guarded, they withhold from sex more than men, and as a result, they become the limiting factors in sexual pairing. This is indeed the reason, even though modern laws and technology work together to reverse the risk bias.
/r/MensRights26/12/22 11:29 PM
3

There's a couple of other things. If the answer to question 1 is yes, then you can ask the reason and/or charge.
/r/MensRights26/12/22 11:25 PM
1

Why would you cross the border to pick up transfer money? Can't money be wired electronically these days?
/r/MensRights26/12/22 11:14 AM
1

It's part of a whole new code which also makes criticising the President a crime. So expect Indonesia to get significantly poorer and generally worse in the coming years.
/r/MensRights26/12/22 05:05 AM
2

Meaning?
/r/MensRights26/12/22 04:44 AM
1

Beware of getting drawn in when she goes into "nice" mode.
/r/MensRights26/12/22 04:11 AM
0

It sounds very much like she is a narcissist. The way to deal with narcissists is 1. Reduce contact as far as is practically possible 2. Do not get drawn into their games, simply rise above the pettiness and 3. Do not allow yourself to be bullied.
/r/MensRights26/12/22 03:59 AM
7

That shouldn't have ruined it for you. You can do your own thing.
/r/MensRights26/12/22 03:46 AM
11

What they might do is try to even the field by maligning men. They could, for example, lie about men getting positions because of some secret society such as the patriarchy.
/r/MensRights26/12/22 03:19 AM
1

if she didn't marry the same would be put to her No. If she didn't marry, her parents would remain permanently responsible for her.
/r/MensRights25/12/22 08:28 AM
9

Evidence?
/r/MensRights25/12/22 07:40 AM
0

Hopefully, Elon Musk will buy Tik Tok.
/r/MensRights25/12/22 06:49 AM
7

The EU is ding much the same thing.
/r/MensRights25/12/22 06:47 AM
1

They had no money Evidence? Very few worked How terrible for them! It’s the same position my cat is in now. What, pampered?
/r/MensRights25/12/22 06:44 AM
1

You haven't justified the number or produced any evidence.
/r/MensRights25/12/22 06:42 AM
1

I don't see There's none so blind.
/r/MensRights25/12/22 06:42 AM
2

To all the women in the Middle East and North Africa: men are treated worse than you are.
/r/MensRights25/12/22 06:41 AM
1

Yes. Full female suffrage was enacted very soon after full male suffrage. The bank account thing is a reflection of female privilege in that women could not be pursued for debts in their own names and therefore banks required a male signature. Women have always been privileged and were entitled to half their husband's property, though it was not the other way around. Read Belfort Bax's The Fraud of Feminism, or The Legal Subjection of Men for detailed accounts of all this, even back in the early…
/r/MensRights25/12/22 06:40 AM
2

American women 110 years ago had no power. Absurd claim. Unless you can come up with evidence.
/r/MensRights24/12/22 01:08 PM
-1

You guess? As in I just made up a number?
/r/MensRights24/12/22 01:07 PM
0

You wouldn't have done unless you are over 100 years old.
/r/MensRights24/12/22 01:06 PM
-2

Women didn’t have much power when they didn’t work or hold any offices. They had plenty.
/r/MensRights24/12/22 01:06 PM
1

The expectation was/is definitely not the same; the son was responsible for financial support. That's the reason for the favoring of sons.
/r/MensRights24/12/22 01:02 PM
1

You're missing something here. Under Chinese law and long-standing cultural practice, the first-born male was responsible for the upkeep of elderly parents. Under the one child policy, the privilege of a female child in not having such a burden, and indeed being entitled to permanent support from her parents if she did not marry (when the burden would become her husband's), meant that parents desperately wanted their only child to be male. This is female privilege and all that is required is for…
/r/MensRights24/12/22 09:56 AM
1

Women have always been privileged.
/r/MensRights24/12/22 09:52 AM
0

It was always a hate movement.
/r/MensRights24/12/22 09:52 AM
4

Woman get treated like shit. No they don't.
/r/MensRights24/12/22 09:51 AM
1

That was mainly due to medical technology.
/r/MensRights24/12/22 09:50 AM
1

There are, still today, female only colleges. Why should there not be male only colleges?
/r/MensRights24/12/22 09:49 AM
1

the Suffragette movement is often considered a feminist movement, and if nothing else, I am in favor of universal suffrage They did not help female suffrage and probably put the process at risk. Secondly, they have opened up alternative options to women Do you have a shred of evidence that feminists had any role in this? feminism got women's medical issues taken seriously See comment above
/r/MensRights24/12/22 09:48 AM
19

That's terrible, 4 women died!
/r/MensRights23/12/22 11:54 PM
0

That is just part of division of gender roles. Women still have it better there See Karen Straughan's you tube "When Female Privilege Backfires" also available transcribed on the AVFM site.
/r/MensRights23/12/22 06:42 AM
0

No, it was an attempt to claim authority for his opinions. Nothing more, nothing less.
/r/MensRights23/12/22 06:34 AM
6

They are disciplined, have great uniforms and get things done. Edit: sorry I was getting confused with Nazis because they're so similar. No, there's nothing I like about feminism.
/r/MensRights23/12/22 06:26 AM
-1

No, I was assigned English at Birth but later transitioned to being Australian.
/r/MensRights23/12/22 06:23 AM
1

Like Joseph Smith's golden plates.
/r/MensRights23/12/22 06:21 AM
0

The people of Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland object to English people using the term England as if it were the whole of the UK, and understandably so. To argue that England is the most important country of the four, which it is by most metrics, is not only irrelevant but adds to the insult. (Disclosure: I am AEAB, assigned English at birth. )
/r/MensRights23/12/22 05:30 AM
1

That is just part of division of gender roles. Women still have it better there See Karen Straughan's you tube "When Female Privilege Backfires" also available transcribed on the AVFM site.
/r/MensRights23/12/22 04:43 AM
0

That's not how it works. Your case, you defend it.
/r/MensRights22/12/22 12:28 PM
-16

Odd that you should tell people it's ridiculous to try to dictate what words should and should not be used and then go on to define yourself as a "real linguist" as if you have the right to define who is or is not a linguist.
/r/MensRights22/12/22 11:19 AM
1

Saudi Arabia I don’t think women can even get drivers license You are wrong about that. But there’s is systemic oppression of women, just not in the western world. Precisely what and where?
/r/MensRights22/12/22 09:44 AM
6

If you are implying that they had less than equal rights, you are wrong because the rights they don't have are always outweighed by special privileges.
/r/MensRights22/12/22 09:43 AM
0

Khan should start by dealing with gangs of members of his own race and religion grooming white girls (mainly) in the North of England.
/r/MensRights22/12/22 09:20 AM
46

"What's the murderer's gender?" "African" "That's the race, I asked for the gender" "My bad, you're sexist not racist."
/r/MensRights22/12/22 09:14 AM
4

See my comment above.
/r/MensRights22/12/22 09:10 AM
-5

Women at one point weren't treated as equals for sure Evidence? in places like much of the Middle East it's awful to be a woman there for sure Evidence? You see the narrative that's spun in your own time and place and can also see that it's complete rubbish, but you still believe the same narrative when it applies to far off times and places. FFS WHY?
/r/MensRights22/12/22 09:10 AM
-21

Actually, I agree that US citizens should not use the term "American" as if it referred exclusively to them. But to me it's more a matter of using language accurately, which is part of being able to think clearly.
/r/MensRights22/12/22 07:40 AM
1

I recommend you read the book The Suffragette Bombers, Britain's Forgotten Terrorists by Simon Webb.
/r/MensRights22/12/22 07:29 AM
3

I don't know why this is downvoted. We should not be using Goofball.
/r/MensRights21/12/22 07:21 AM
3

Not really evidence for the existence of the patriarchy.
/r/MensRights20/12/22 09:13 PM
8

I didn't even know females have a womb before I was a high school student. Well, there's actually some debate about that these days. The leader of the opposition in the British House of Commons was unable to deny or confirm that women had wombs.
/r/MensRights20/12/22 10:00 AM
29

The Suffragettes were terrorists. They sent the first letter bombs. They attacked buildings and attempted to kill British Prime Minister LLoyd George. And they had very little to complain about; they existed at a time when men were being drafted and killed in their thousands while women (led by Suffragettes) handed out white feathers. The reality is that women have always been privileged. The only difference is that now they are wholly ungrateful.
/r/MensRights20/12/22 09:49 AM
16

Most guys I know IRL see the double standards, they're just afraid to discuss it openly Indeed they do. Most women also see the double standards, but I suspect they don't do or say anything because they think that men can or ought to defend their own rights.
/r/MensRights20/12/22 09:15 AM
9

I do think a certain type of patriarchal power structure does exist. Details and evidence?
/r/MensRights18/12/22 07:45 AM
2

In many cases, poor grammar is due to lack of education. In this one, it seems to be the result of mental disturbance preventing coherent thoughts.
/r/MensRights18/12/22 02:44 AM
4

I recommend the book "The Multi Orgasmic Man" by Mantak Chia.
/r/MensRights18/12/22 01:18 AM
2

It probably is, the style of the two posters seems to be identical.
/r/MensRights17/12/22 11:59 PM
3

You didn't answer the question.
/r/MensRights17/12/22 03:02 PM
8

Being her authentic self by quoting, word for word, somebody else's post under her own pseudonym.
/r/MensRights17/12/22 02:40 PM
43

Look at her posting history, it's like an encyclopedia of beliefs that don't fit reality: People get sexually assaulted a lot since consent isn’t even taught. and The empowered women concept is coming from a history of oppression to women in North America. Since they had less rights from colonization. Treated like property and basically womb on legs/sex doll. As part of the cisheteropatriarchy ... and only if you really think femininity and masculinity is binary and prescribed based on White ide…
/r/MensRights17/12/22 10:35 AM
10

it feels way better being your authentic self, Spoken by someone using an Internet alias I'll take integrity over wearing a mask any day. So use your real name then.
/r/MensRights17/12/22 09:26 AM
20

Too late. Damned if you leave her, damned if you don't. I would become a blue pill beta simp and she suddenly wouldn't love me anymore. Then she will leave you. Not entirely safe, but probably your best option. Go travelling. On your own, the cheapest way. See the World.
/r/MensRights17/12/22 06:37 AM
20

This needs some undercover journalist to record different lawyers suggesting that an accusation would be useful. Then the lawyers need to be named and disbarred from practising.
/r/MensRights17/12/22 04:03 AM
76

Women can do everything that men can do. Except take a joke. Or any kind of criticism. Or hear anything they might find offensive. It looks to me very much like the ones pushing the anti-misogyny meme are the ones who think least of women. It is they, not ordinary people, who are the most extreme sexists.
/r/MensRights17/12/22 04:01 AM
-3

That's a list of institutions, not evidence. And it doesn't include "almost everyone".
/r/MensRights17/12/22 01:25 AM
0

Almost everyone? Do you have evidence?
/r/MensRights17/12/22 01:06 AM
2

Women are the majority of the adult population.
/r/MensRights15/12/22 11:31 PM
27

Men are a minority.
/r/MensRights15/12/22 11:19 AM
6

If you really believe that women can compete with men in sports, you are seriously deluded.
/r/MensRights15/12/22 01:21 AM
3

It would be interesting legally if a man got hurt carrying a weight between the two limits.
/r/MensRights15/12/22 01:06 AM
31

If he was returned pretty quickly, then he had indisputable proof of his innocence. If there had been any doubt, they would have held him longer.
/r/MensRights14/12/22 04:34 AM
21

it's not just a rumor How do you know? Were you there?
/r/MensRights14/12/22 03:48 AM
1

That's passive aggression for you: "I was only...". Grow up.
/r/MensRights13/12/22 03:20 PM
4

Pathetic passive-aggressive personal attack that has nothing to do with the issue.
/r/MensRights13/12/22 05:28 AM
6

It might be a more valuable qualification if it was Reiki mistress.
/r/MensRights13/12/22 12:17 AM
1

A big factor is that she usually wants the man to spend as much time as she does getting things the way she wants them.
/r/MensRights13/12/22 12:14 AM
3

About the author of this article: Laura Staloch Laura Staloch Laura Staloch is a teacher, children's book author, and level III reiki master. She has a master's degree in Psychology and Educational Administration. Her work in the classroom includes teaching advanced psychology courses, and diversity studies.
/r/MensRights13/12/22 12:07 AM
2

If you have this sort of problem at home, get your wife a copy of Laura Doyle's "The Surrendered Wife." It is a woman explaining, in womanspeak, why if you want everything done your way, you should do it yourself. It says such things as "When you complain that your husband doesn't help out in the kitchen, ask yourself how you behaved the last time he tried."
/r/MensRights13/12/22 12:04 AM
2

we need to be more 'egalitarian' in our relationships Please explain. inequalities need to be addressed in certain parts of the world Even if this is true, which I doubt, it is not your concern.
/r/MensRights12/12/22 11:52 PM
1

"Are you a feminist?" "Oh my God, do I look like one? Quick, where's there a mirror?"
/r/MensRights12/12/22 11:49 PM
22

I await the time she concludes that the women taking advantage of it are just as violent as the men they left.
/r/MensRights12/12/22 02:26 PM
4

What about witchcraft? Is that a sin too? Should we not suffer witches to live? Edit: If you uphold ancient superstitions, you should expect the same results to occur.
/r/MensRights11/12/22 12:53 PM
-22

Isn't a real man someone toxic?
/r/MensRights11/12/22 09:16 AM
6

I suspect that you are not very muscular. If you put some muscle on, which requires four things, you will find that, as if by magic, you can do all the things you are currently falsely accused of without consequence. The four things you need are enough sleep, doing the workouts, enough protein in your diet and enough water. You shouldn't have to, but that's the way things work, so make it work to your advantage.
/r/MensRights11/12/22 03:51 AM
2

Isn't the word "moaner"?
/r/MensRights11/12/22 01:32 AM
4

"Girls and boys can both identify with a male lead, but boys cannot identify with a female lead." Therefore, the feminist argument that women are not competitive with men in some fields because they don't have any female role models to copy is wrong. And affirmative action to counter said problem will achieve nothing.
/r/MensRights11/12/22 01:22 AM
9

When you understand what triggers attraction in women and how to manipulate it, you end up having a lot less respect for the ability to attract them. To answer your questions read The Rational Male vols 1 and 2 by Rollo Tomassi.
/r/MensRights10/12/22 10:15 AM
2

Although the Chinese government has outlawed representations of feminine men in pop videos, presumably because they want tough fighting and working men.
/r/MensRights10/12/22 03:03 AM
2

I’ve been really fortunate to travel the world and date women of various backgrounds. Now is your opportunity to do more of that.
/r/MensRights09/12/22 09:32 AM
2

Your headline refers to "real feminism" and you go on to berate the attitudes of those you refer to "radical feminists" ruining the definition of feminism. This unavoidably implies that you are identifying what real feminism is even though in all its real life manifestations it is clearly anti-male.
/r/MensRights09/12/22 06:48 AM
2

While both sexes deform memories over time, it seems to me evident that women are more susceptible to alteration of perceptions over time to fit a desired interpretation. Thus, something a "victim" did not consider to be rape within 12 months of the actual event can be modified in the memory over time to be re-evaluated as such. We have a high profile example of just such a scenario in the case of Monica Lewinsky and Bill Clinton. For 20 years after their relationship was made public, she repres…
/r/MensRights08/12/22 10:54 AM
13

"we were told girls and boys can both identify with a male lead, but boys cannot identify with a female lead," she said. The usual woke logic, all built on some vague assertion made without any kind of support or justification.
/r/MensRights08/12/22 08:22 AM
2

baldness is (mainly) passed on from mothers to sons Where did you get this from?
/r/MensRights08/12/22 06:32 AM
1

You don't have to lose anything tangible; your reputation is an asset.
/r/MensRights08/12/22 06:29 AM
14

See a lawyer. Don't communicate with HR except on his advice. Record everything.
/r/MensRights08/12/22 06:28 AM
2

I thought it was to stop your hand slipping off the end!
/r/MensRights08/12/22 06:25 AM
27

It is exactly an apples to apples comparison.
/r/MensRights08/12/22 06:21 AM
3

You don't think it was likely that it was simply made up?
/r/MensRights08/12/22 06:19 AM
4

It says that this is "statistically shown". One wonders how that was achieved.
/r/MensRights07/12/22 09:21 PM
1

Like I expected; your information is not firsthand.
/r/MensRights07/12/22 04:26 AM
1

I support Iranian women's struggles. Where do you get your information on this subject from?
/r/MensRights06/12/22 09:18 PM
0

Rollo Tomasi wrote a great description of mimicking female dating profiles under the title qualities of the Prince
/r/MensRights06/12/22 11:11 AM
21

What levels constitute insane? And who are these individuals with such levels? How do you know what their levels are?
/r/MensRights04/12/22 08:58 AM
9

The failure to grow up, largely because of absent or helicopter parents, leaving grown people still thinking and behaving like spoilt toddlers.
/r/MensRights04/12/22 01:15 AM
51

Women are not disadantaged by current society, they are privileged by it.
/r/MensRights03/12/22 04:18 PM
1

Record everything. What you have already not recorded needs to be written down in detail and dated. You will need reliable records at some stage, start gathering them now. Do not quit, stand up for yourself, having gathered your evidence, and sue if they fire you or force you out.
/r/MensRights02/12/22 11:54 PM
2

And the Union of European Socialist Republics and the UK.
/r/MensRights02/12/22 12:36 PM
2

It's resulting in First World countries maintaining their populations only by immigration.
/r/MensRights02/12/22 02:44 AM
2

I wonder if it will be men's fault that these women are ending up old, alone and unfulfilled. Will we be blamed for not fighting feminism enough?
/r/MensRights02/12/22 01:15 AM
2

this will ruin an entire generation It's seriously harmed two generations already.
/r/MensRights02/12/22 12:48 AM
1

This is delusional nonsense. We are largely determined by genetics and evolution and we can no more decide that youth is not a major part of a woman's beauty than Bruce Jenner can decide that he is a woman. I know it, you know it, women know it, Bruce Jenner knows it.
/r/MensRights02/12/22 12:16 AM
8

It's not up to us. It is what it is.
/r/MensRights01/12/22 03:10 PM
2

"They"? Are these scientists men by any chance?
/r/MensRights01/12/22 02:46 PM
15

let's not imply that women's most valuable asset is her youth. No, let's state it explicitly: many women's most valuable asset is their youth.
/r/MensRights01/12/22 02:43 PM
1

No. I know it, you know it, they know it.
/r/MensRights01/12/22 02:41 PM
7

many women were either content to keep things or unable or unwilling to change things. Despite being oppressed, they tended to vote for more conservative parties er, no
/r/MensRights01/12/22 02:40 PM
12

You're in seventh grade. Everything you do should be seen as a learning opportunity. Here are a couple of possibilities in the current situation: 1. Learn the art of Socratic argument; ask them loads of questions about the song ("which I don't really understand"). Get a recording of the song. Don't express an opinion, merely let them go further and further towards whatever the underlying mentality is. You might also ask if she agrees with the song's sentiments. If so, why does she think she is r…
/r/MensRights01/12/22 12:37 AM
42

War Is peace. ​ Freedom is slavery. ​ Ignorance is strength. ​ Equality is discrimination.
/r/MensRights30/11/22 03:01 AM
2

This is all explained in the 17th episode of season 9, "Lisa the Simpson": Main Plot Lisa tries to solve a brain teaser, and she fails as Martin, Milhouse, Bart, and even Nelson can solve it. She does not remember the code combination for her school locker, also forgets to do an agriculture project, and does a last minute job of an "eraser pig", and loses her saxophone technique. These things point to evidence that Lisa fears she is losing her gift of intelligence. When she tells about this to G…
/r/MensRights28/11/22 03:28 PM
0

From the article: "That stark gender divide is most likely because women in the UK began smoking in large numbers some years after men did so, the researchers believe. They pointed to the fact that while cases of lung cancer have fallen among men overall in Britain, they have remained stable or increased among women, and gone up among women from deprived backgrounds." How did women start smoking? One factor was a man named Edward Bernays selling the idea that smoking made them strong independent…
/r/MensRights28/11/22 02:34 PM
2

One factor influences the probability of a woman being subject to DV as much as all other factors together: whether she is violent herself. The best thing we can do to reduce DV against women therefore is to tell women not to be violent themselves and cut the risk in half.
/r/MensRights28/11/22 03:42 AM
8

how terrible women are for wanting equality, I do no such thing. how terrible society is with feminism in it As above I could be completely wrong... You are indeed. One of my big things IRL is the practice of gratitude, something I have shared with many other people.
/r/MensRights27/11/22 12:04 PM
10

I'm not an oppressed man, I have everything in life I could reasonably wish for. I talk about feminism a lot, not so much about women. Your personal attacks are a poor reflection on you. Women's suffrage is a very well documented issue Men had to fight for universal suffrage, women were given it almost immediately afterwards without taking on the responsibilities of men. That is well documented. women not being allowed to serve on the front line is a male led decision, one that women have often …
/r/MensRights27/11/22 11:36 AM
9

you just edited your response and added some 'supporting commentary', I'd say that's not having a good faith discussion. No, I didn't. specifically women having to fight tooth and nail to vote No, they didn't. It was given to them without the concomitant responsibility to defend the nation. men who deny the patriarchy either don't know much about the history of the world The onus is on you to show it exists.
/r/MensRights27/11/22 11:25 AM
6

Is that your idea of arguing in good faith?
/r/MensRights27/11/22 11:03 AM
8

If that's being careful with her words ("Bullshit!"), I don't want to be around her when she lets herself down. The panel ask her for facts to support her "feelings" which she cannot provide. The woman believes all the "men have oppressed women" propaganda that feminists push, but cannot give any evidence to support it.
/r/MensRights27/11/22 10:58 AM
-5

You're not educated anywhere.
/r/MensRights27/11/22 10:15 AM
-6

What a wonderfully persuasive argument. For reforming the public education system in the US.
/r/MensRights27/11/22 10:08 AM
85

A figure way less than obesity, smoking or lack of exercise. As a man, I feel responsible for the 0.0043% of men who committed murders last year, so to make up for it, next year, whenever I see a woman sitting down, smoking or eating junk food I'm going to go and tell her to go for a run, eat something healthy of stop smoking. That should please them.
/r/MensRights27/11/22 09:35 AM
5

These are ridiculous laws and were intended to target men. He was a former prison officer who had probably met a few inmates (males) because of such laws and decided to see if they could work both ways.
/r/MensRights27/11/22 09:03 AM
17

nothing wrong with believing people That really depends on whether they are telling the truth.
/r/MensRights27/11/22 01:40 AM
0

Its common knowledge wife beating was prevalent in the 50s . It might be a common belief, but is it true? Do you have evidence? What about voting rights? In most of the world universal female suffrage arrived around a decade after universal male suffrage, and came without concomitant obligations to do military service. The voting "issue" is a straw man.
/r/MensRights27/11/22 01:13 AM
1

were legally allowed to be beat by their husbands. What, when and where are you talking about? How can I have a true partner if society treated her like my property? Not property, responsibility. And what are you talking about w.r.t. electrotherapy? Was this another sexist male plot to lobotomise disobedient wives?
/r/MensRights26/11/22 11:28 PM
2

It's entirely because men were obligated to support their families and all women had to do was get married to be supported. It's like saying in some countries men are given free clothes and women are not, when the reality is that those clothes are uniforms provided as part of compulsory military service.
/r/MensRights26/11/22 11:25 PM
2

spite of the systemic sexism that surrounded them in academia Evidence? the legal right to earn a wage and legally be allowed to keep it in peacetime As far as I know this has never been denied women. What, where and when are you talking about? inheritance laws, which didn't allow women to inherit What, where and when are you talking about?
/r/MensRights26/11/22 11:23 PM
5

The onus is on her to prove her case. Ask questions until she ties herself in knots.
/r/MensRights26/11/22 10:21 AM
92

women are relying on men financially – only today, unlike previous centuries, they are choosing to Not really understanding history there. her generation, “fought for her independence” They were merely given everything they asked for. The pandemic was somewhat regressive for the female workforce with women making up 54 per cent of job losses Ever the victims In the past five years the UK has seen two female prime ministers Both short-lived and abject failures In April 2021, there was still a gen…
/r/MensRights26/11/22 08:56 AM
3

Do you eat meat?
/r/MensRights26/11/22 07:06 AM
6

Women have now, and have always had, a better rights/obligations ratio than men. Feminism is not now, nor ever was, about women attaining equal rights.
/r/MensRights26/11/22 07:04 AM
2

I am for feminism Why?
/r/MensRights26/11/22 07:03 AM
1

Same as happened to Julian Assange.
/r/MensRights25/11/22 11:47 PM
45

If it's his baby.
/r/MensRights25/11/22 09:08 AM
1

I agree with him. The standard of articles at AVFM we get linked on this sub has been poor for about 7 years. I often have to ask myself what the author's point is. This particular article is rambling and tedious.
/r/MensRights24/11/22 10:18 AM
20

What's your point?
/r/MensRights24/11/22 10:15 AM
1

Source?
/r/MensRights24/11/22 07:08 AM
1

What's wrong with the man?
/r/MensRights23/11/22 09:17 PM
1

Thanks.
/r/MensRights22/11/22 06:25 AM
10

And record them.
/r/MensRights21/11/22 11:29 AM
3

John Harvey Kellogg?
/r/MensRights21/11/22 08:31 AM
10

Because an 8 day old baby has no religion. Circumcising him denies him the right of religious freedom as well as bodily autonomy.
/r/MensRights21/11/22 08:31 AM
2

I'm sure it's not the one you're looking for, but you might like to check out The Mating Mind by Geoffrey Miller in which he argues that the evolution of the human brain was driven by female selection for good talkers/thinkers.
/r/MensRights21/11/22 08:29 AM
1

Sounds like another Greta Thunberg.
/r/MensRights21/11/22 06:43 AM
6

He needs to see a lawyer.
/r/MensRights20/11/22 11:56 AM
8

There is a big cultural difference between Europe and India in the way people look at others, just as slurping your noodles would be ill-mannered in England but is obligatory in Japan. In India people look at you directly and hold that look for a time which would be considered downright aggressive in Europe. Europeans in India are often surprised when "staring back" has no effect since in India the conventions are entirely different. I suspect, without having seen what happened or having full fa…
/r/MensRights20/11/22 09:14 AM
1

Can you explain how this all works please?
/r/MensRights20/11/22 08:47 AM
1

Look carefully though. The last line is in a different typeface indicating that it has been tacked on. I don't think Golding said said the last line, someone else turned the original comment into a joke and he (Golding) just needed female approval and mistakenly believed he would get it by brown-nosing.
/r/MensRights20/11/22 08:43 AM
1

No, he's talking about Muslims. Oh, wait...
/r/MensRights20/11/22 08:30 AM
2

she is threatening to dox me to my current employers about what my thoughts are about feminism. It's none of your employer's business unless you take your politics to work with you. I write my opinions under my real name and it doesn't take an expert to find them using only the name. So let her tell your employer and apologise to him for having his time wasted by her. Also, invest the time and effort to get on well with everyone you work with and/or under. If you have a good relationship with th…
/r/MensRights18/11/22 04:18 AM
2

Not all degrees have the same value. Some degrees, e.g. one in women's studies, probably have negative value. Others, e.g. philosophy, don't have a great deal of value and some, e.g. engineering have real value. When I say value, I mean 1. in terms of the career opportunities they open up and 2. what they actually represent in terms of learning and personal development. Some would say that liberal arts degrees represent a high level of personal development, but my experience of graduates in thos…
/r/MensRights17/11/22 03:21 AM
1

Record and then play the recording to the police. Or record or store as evidence in eventual divorce proceedings.
/r/MensRights17/11/22 02:22 AM
5

"I know, I know" "Monica, You asked the question."
/r/MensRights17/11/22 02:17 AM
4

Apart from legal professionals?
/r/MensRights16/11/22 11:50 PM
15

A woman's right to abuse!
/r/MensRights16/11/22 11:40 PM
3

There are annual men's gatherings in every Australian state. Do a search for your local one
/r/MensRights16/11/22 08:52 AM
2

Every year. You can sign up for the website and they will send you details from time to time. This is the 27th year.
/r/MensRights16/11/22 05:10 AM
10

Feminism is a hate movement.
/r/MensRights15/11/22 11:40 PM
29

Loss of privilege is not the same as oppression. What specific privilege are you citing here? Those who participated in and benefited from a fixed system should not be surprised when that privilege is withdrawn. Even if their involvement was unwilling. Can you tell us what you are talking about please, this is very abstract? Who are you referring to, what were their benefits and what fixed system are you referring to?
/r/MensRights15/11/22 03:16 PM
3

You don't understand. There's traditional equality, which happens when things have the same value and the new equality, the online equivalent of quality in the real world. When feminists talk of equality, they mean the digital version and are in favour of it because it means they can say anything they like online and it becomes the truth.
/r/MensRights15/11/22 03:10 PM
2

At least you apologized No, see skcuf2's comment above.
/r/MensRights14/11/22 11:30 PM
16

When you are pissed off is not the time to debate.
/r/MensRights14/11/22 12:47 AM
3

Who said I'm upset about it? However it is wrong. Particularly for any male who loses a place because of this discrimination, especially because the person occupying said place and didn't get there on merit is less likely to see the course through than others. See Thomas Sowell on how this approach does not even benefit those who are supposed to get the advantage.
/r/MensRights13/11/22 09:02 AM
2

I am saying that your argument about the proportions of a particular identity in a group is an absurd attempt to justify discrimination.
/r/MensRights13/11/22 08:10 AM
2

Only about 8% of the population of South Africa is white. I don't think others should see it as a threat if they are given some advantages.
/r/MensRights13/11/22 07:52 AM
72

The UN is a very sinister organisation.
/r/MensRights13/11/22 03:56 AM
8

The onus is on them to produce some evidence.
/r/MensRights13/11/22 12:54 AM
1

If you have to give an obviously false interpretation like that, it is clear you are deluding yourself. A little introspection would help you unload the attitudes you cling to in the face of reality so that you can move on in life more effectively.
/r/MensRights12/11/22 11:02 PM
1

You've misunderstood it. It's about how police are insensitive when dealing with women. She is the victim in this.
/r/MensRights12/11/22 10:57 PM
7

It should be the other way round. Japanese society depends on the loyalty and hard work of the salarymen who work long hours often for their entire working life in the same company. I don't think female graduates are going to do that.
/r/MensRights12/11/22 06:49 AM
3

The funny thing is they genuinely believe they earned their degrees.
/r/MensRights12/11/22 06:33 AM
1

It says: "Circumcised men take longer to reach ejaculation, which can be viewed as "an advantage, rather than a complication," writes lead researcher Temucin Senkul, a urologist with GATA Haydarpasa Training Hospital in Istanbul, Turkey. His paper appears in the current issue of the journal Adult Urology...But what about guys who don't get circumcised as babies" thus making the statement about those who were circumcised as babies.
/r/MensRights12/11/22 12:52 AM
1

Well they must be misinformed since they don't support your position.
/r/MensRights12/11/22 12:37 AM
11

Actually, I think she did. She was 17, which is above the age of consent in most areas of the world. I think she knew what she was doing and was never a victim.
/r/MensRights12/11/22 12:36 AM
1

It doesn't slow down ejaculation. I have no idea where that came from. Perhaps I should tell you " That's what everyone does. You literally have the gateway to all recorded information." but that would be inappropriate, the convention is that you defend your own position so here is a link.
/r/MensRights12/11/22 12:34 AM
0

it cannot be properly measured on a general basis But that is exactly what your cited study claims to do. Because 64% of newborn boys undergo circumcision Source? Can you explain the argument that it slows down ejaculation in the face of your claims?
/r/MensRights11/11/22 11:47 PM
11

And later, she was recruiting for Epstein.
/r/MensRights11/11/22 11:25 PM
1

She did the same thing as Ghislaine Maxwell for 3 years. However, public opinion vilifies Maxwell and takes Giuffre as a victim.
/r/MensRights11/11/22 11:23 PM
2

Besides, when the foreskin is taken at an early age, the penis develops differently. Source? In fact, nerves in the remaining foreskin redevelop to a degree where the sensation has essentially fully returned. source? Oddly proponents of mgm have justified it by stating that it slows down orgasm and is thus a good thing. This would not be the case if the sensation had fully returned.
/r/MensRights11/11/22 11:19 PM
1

So nothing to support the statement that 9 in ten girls will be raped, a completely different statement from 90% of rape victims are female.
/r/MensRights11/11/22 10:51 PM
2

The myth that it makes the penis insensitive is bullshit. I didn't say any such thing. I said that people who have had it taken away from them at an early age cannot know the sensations they are missing. It's unwise to pretend that everyone who has a different perspective than you is naive and uneducated, perhaps brainwashed and contributing to a problem. I did no such thing. It's better to try and listen. Given that you are reading more into my words than you are reading out of them, you should…
/r/MensRights11/11/22 10:49 PM
13

I agree. But there are a lot of men who would deny that they have been harmed and argue that they don't feel any less than intact men, even though they have no means of knowing this. Such people are largely instrumental in keeping the barbaric practice going.
/r/MensRights11/11/22 07:36 AM
7

Yes, but if the foreskin was taken before they can remember, they can have no meaningful knowledge on the sensation they would have had if they had been left alone.
/r/MensRights11/11/22 06:56 AM
2

One of the advantages of a constitutional monarchy is that there is someone above politics to ensure due process is followed. The US, in just over 100 years, has had not one, but three, presidents running the country while suffering from dementia (Wilson, Reagan, Biden). In a constitutional monarchy, someone not fit to govern, and being mentally sound IS a job requirement for a British prime minister, can be replaced from above. It would be impossible for someone like Biden to continue to hold p…
/r/MensRights11/11/22 05:29 AM
1

You can call a meat-eater a killer.
/r/MensRights11/11/22 05:09 AM
41

No penis, no opinion. In fact, better to say, no foreskin, no opinion.
/r/MensRights11/11/22 05:04 AM
6

so that would be in a class of 30, 27 girls will be raped. Evidence?
/r/MensRights11/11/22 04:01 AM
10

Untrue.
/r/MensRights10/11/22 09:41 AM
8

Not true. See (here)[https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/moral-landscapes/201109/myths-about-circumcision-you-likely-believe]
/r/MensRights10/11/22 09:38 AM
1

It means it conforms to policy, but it does not mean it conforms to the law.
/r/MensRights09/11/22 09:13 AM
1

"Since women don't want to negociate, sacrifice their personal life, commute as much as men and work as hard as men to perform, men should not get rewarded for doing so". Coming soon: "Women in crisis because they can't find husbands who can support them in the way they expect."
/r/MensRights09/11/22 09:06 AM
1

OP has recently posted that: He was falsely accused accused of sexual harassment by a girl at his college and is now taking legal action against the college, even though he pleaded guilty to the charge. "After months of unemployemnt I was finally hired today!...If I don't work I don't eat " (one day ago) "(I've) got my own business" (one day ago) "My mother abused all three of us (2 siblings), and when I got to college I basically called the entire family into a room and confessed this. My sibli…
/r/MensRights09/11/22 08:57 AM
1

After enduring weeks of sexual harassment by staff members at my apartment complex, What did they do specifically? Did you record and gather evidence?
/r/MensRights09/11/22 08:38 AM
4

For the reason you just gave. See a lawyer now.
/r/MensRights09/11/22 08:37 AM
1

she had a crappy experience with men. Possibly the same way that Theunis Botha had a crappy experience with elephants.
/r/MensRights09/11/22 08:30 AM
3

If I was in charge, it would all work properly, because me.
/r/MensRights09/11/22 08:16 AM
6

You obviously have zero idea how actual communism WOULD work. It’s never been implemented before. You have to use the conditional because it can only exist in theory. Where it has been attempted the bodies just piled up: The Soviet Union under Stalin, The PRC under Mao, Peru under the Shining Path. How many millions of deaths will it take for you to accept that it is an experiment which must never be tried again? Homelessness would be gone. Drug addicts would have help. No more starving people. …
/r/MensRights09/11/22 08:16 AM
1

"Not real communists". Where is a real communist country then? Name one. Edit: 23 hours later, still waiting for an answer on this.
/r/MensRights09/11/22 08:10 AM
1

What's a zero sum game?
/r/MensRights09/11/22 04:42 AM
3

No, they're brilliant. And they've got diplomas to prove it.
/r/MensRights09/11/22 01:09 AM
1

This is nonsense. Nearly all of us are doing better than we were 200 years ago.
/r/MensRights09/11/22 01:06 AM
9

The case they describe is a woman retrospectively accusing her (ex-)boyfriend on multiple occasions. It looks like she went back for more implying that it was consensual. Maybe she didn't "realise it was assault at the time", but then you have to ask how he ought to know. Then they cite Eleanor de Freitas, who has been the subject of posts here before.
/r/MensRights07/11/22 07:07 AM
1

It is neither, it is about the capacity to do it. You just moved the goalposts there. Genocide isn't a term that should be used lightly, while killing of 3000 to 15000 people is bad, calling it a genocide is stretching it in the case of Tasmania. Genocide is the killing of a people from gens/gentis race or people and caedo/caedere kill. It is not a question of what the actual number is. The claim that all races are equally violent is a tough one to justify, showing widespread violence in the Wor…
/r/MensRights06/11/22 09:15 PM
1

That doesn't come close to proving your case.
/r/MensRights06/11/22 09:07 PM
-2

Is the damage done approximately the same in proportion to the numbers? or is it and absolute amount of damage that is being compared. Do you have sources and numbers to justify these statements, if so, what are they? genocides etc are same on all sides genocides committed by Tasmanian Aborigines: 0, genocides committed against them: 1 Genocides committed by native Haitians: 0, genocides committed against them: 1
/r/MensRights06/11/22 12:09 PM
1

Every race is equally aggressive Evidence?
/r/MensRights06/11/22 11:58 AM
56

From start to finish, this speech is pure drivel.
/r/MensRights05/11/22 02:55 PM
21

I wonder if she knows how many women are killed by cigarettes. Far more than the number of women killed by men.
/r/MensRights05/11/22 02:13 PM
16

Please lose her again.
/r/MensRights05/11/22 01:32 PM
2

We just don't agree on the origins of feminism. I also don't agree with people who say that Marxism started out with good intentions. Both movements are based on the same envy, resentment and selfishness.
/r/MensRights05/11/22 12:57 PM
2

No, they always wanted selective equality: voting? "We'll have some of that" military obligations? "No, we'll leave that one" Abortion? "on demand" Termination of child support obligations for men? "No, men must pay" etc. They simply demanded anything that benefitted them. "Equality" was just a useful way of tricking people into thinking they were looking for some kind of fairness. It seems to have worked.
/r/MensRights05/11/22 04:51 AM
2

Full female suffrage was accorded just 10 years after full male suffrage. It's an irrelevance. Google "Suffragette terrorism." And compare military obligations for men and women. Also google "White feather, Suffragettes." The article you linked says that the original goal of feminism was to open up opportunities for women, which is not what you said. Even the name should tell you it was never about equality, being named after just one group.
/r/MensRights05/11/22 04:41 AM
5

From the article you linked: The first wave of feminism took place in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, emerging out of an environment of urban industrialism and liberal, socialist politics. The goal of this wave was to open up opportunities for women, with a focus on suffrage. The goal was to open up opportunities for women, not a fight for equal rights.
/r/MensRights05/11/22 04:35 AM
2

Your statement, you prove it.
/r/MensRights05/11/22 03:55 AM
6

feminism began as a movement to fight for.. ‘equal’ ..rights. No, it didn't.
/r/MensRights05/11/22 03:40 AM
1

This is American sign language for 't'.
/r/AntiFeminists05/11/22 02:40 AM
2

They require you to watch it because they don't need your consent to force you.
/r/AntiFeminists05/11/22 02:36 AM
1

Yes, they would have to take responsibility for themselves and earn their own money. They wouldn't have anyone legally obliged to support them.
/r/MensRights05/11/22 02:33 AM
1

And can you answer the question?
/r/MensRights05/11/22 02:15 AM
0

No they were not, they were his responsibility. The property thing is a gross misrepresentation, as I am sure you realise. If marriage was such a one-sided affair, why were women always so keen to get married?
/r/MensRights05/11/22 02:08 AM
1

Women were not held responsible. You are misrepresenting my words.
/r/MensRights05/11/22 12:49 AM
2

Read any 19th century chick literature; getting married was the main goal of girls' lives. If marriage was so bad for women, they would not have been so keen to get married, nor would they have sent their daughters down the same path.
/r/MensRights05/11/22 12:47 AM
1

her legal existence was merged with his. In that case, the sentence that preceded cannot be true. If they were merged, she was not his property. They're giving degrees away too easily these days.
/r/MensRights05/11/22 12:44 AM
1

Male responsibility for both person's affairs.
/r/MensRights05/11/22 12:43 AM
1

If you had not started your own business, some other person would have started a similar business and gained more success because of it, and they would have hired more people. And that business doing well here, means another business elsewhere will do worse elsewhere. If that were true, all societies would be equally wealthy.
/r/MensRights05/11/22 12:37 AM
2

Your sources are a bizarre basis for any beliefs.
/r/MensRights02/11/22 03:06 PM
2

They are left-brained. 90% of people of both sexes are left-brained. That's why we are right-handed.
/r/MensRights02/11/22 02:49 PM
10

There are quite a lot of this type of person with an attitude of "the more we educate them...". It's an assumption, which seems to be based on absolutely nothing, that they have some kind of moral or intellectual authority over others. My general experience is that they know very little about anything including the subject they graduated in.
/r/MensRights31/10/22 11:05 PM
9

Things that didnt happen #3428
/r/MensRights31/10/22 10:43 PM
8

Universal male suffrage arrived in Britain and most other places around ten years before universal female suffrage. Female conscription was never applied. The business of bank accounts was in fact female privilege backfiring; husbands were legally obliged to support their wives, as indeed they still are, and often their ex-wives as well. Did you know that in some places doctors will not perform vasectomies without the wife's permission. Your understanding of Arab culture could do with some learn…
/r/MensRights31/10/22 02:45 PM
2

Women have never been oppressed relative to men. I’m talking about social “privileges” that minority groups have recently “acquired” and them being viewed as an “attack” on “mens rights”. Can you be more precise?
/r/MensRights31/10/22 02:39 PM
2

To what?
/r/MensRights31/10/22 02:54 AM
4

Guess whose breakfast will be cold tomorrow.
/r/MensRights30/10/22 10:42 PM
2

Get her a copy of The Surrendered Wife by Laura Doyle.
/r/MensRights30/10/22 10:41 PM
2

he was only on trial was because he was a black man being accused by a white woman Two issues there, one of which you seem to be overlooking, the fact that the story could not have taken place with the genders reversed. she admitted in court that it never happened Read it again.
/r/MensRights30/10/22 10:32 PM
60

You didn't read it properly, these people are "experts".
/r/MensRights30/10/22 10:27 PM
12

I wasn't accusing you of being soft on feminism, I was merely remarking that the inability to see men's problems is not a random glitch. I would apply the same logic when George W Bush defended his Gulf War policies on the basis that the war was waged in good faith on wrong information. I would suggest there was a reason for the existence of the wrong information in the first place and a reason for believing it with so little evidence. Similarly, there is a reason women are very quick to dismiss…
/r/MensRights30/10/22 11:43 AM
11

just haven’t given much thought to what men deal with. You might like to reflect on how this happened to such a large number of women.
/r/MensRights30/10/22 11:05 AM
13

The focus has been on the race of the victim in To Kill A Mockingbird forever, almost as if it could have happened with the genders reversed. I'm only guessing, but I expect it will be the same with the new movie.
/r/MensRights30/10/22 07:04 AM
35

My guess is the focus will be on race, like it is with To Killing A Mockingbird.
/r/MensRights30/10/22 06:52 AM
2

This is where identifying as a woman comes in handy. You need to compromise by accepting the private changing room that they will offer you so you don't have to change with all the other ladies.
/r/MensRights30/10/22 04:28 AM
1

Yes, that's what I was saying.
/r/MensRights30/10/22 02:09 AM
6

So feminism says that men accused of rape are deserving of rights? Not on my planet.
/r/MensRights29/10/22 01:14 PM
139

"I would caution against equating issues of empiricism in calculating the present-day wage gap with the claim that feminism is, as you put it, "a giant disinformation campaign," What this means is that you have to empirically show that everything else about feminism is a disinformation campaign. Thus you need also to demonstrate the falsity of the way historical oppression is presented, the dishonesty in the representation of DV, the misrepresentation of the Suffragettes and the lies taught as g…
/r/MensRights29/10/22 01:10 PM
6

Yes, and so should she be if she wore makeup.
/r/MensRights29/10/22 01:05 PM
1

"A Self-ordained professor's tongue, too serious to fool, Spouted out that liberty is just equality in school" Bob Dylan, My Back Pages from 1964
/r/MensRights29/10/22 12:58 PM
55

We need to await the outcome before judging. The accused should not be named and shamed publicly until after conviction, the same as if it were a man being accused.
/r/MensRights29/10/22 07:48 AM
1

the general point of view is it is mainstream knowledge that women get trafficked like simple I didn't ask about the general point of view, I asked for evidence. Women have less rights in North Korea. Yet another statement presented without evidence. Some anecdotal stories about women being trafficked does not provide any evidence for the statement that they have less rights. You still haven't begun to address my original four questions and your passive aggressive approach implying that you know…
/r/MensRights29/10/22 07:38 AM
1

Four clear questions. No answers. Go to the library and get an account for a university database and there are so many articles and studies on this. That's not the way it works. You make the claim, you justify it. Otherwise there is no evidence. It is absurd for you to come here and make statements that fly in the face of the general viewpoint that is held and try to justify them with absurd non-arguments like "there is so much evidence." women have a significantly worse quality of life. How do …
/r/MensRights29/10/22 05:59 AM
30

But it doesn't cause violence.
/r/MensRights29/10/22 03:59 AM
12

It's surprising there is any space left in prison with all those people who tweeted "killallmen" safely locked away.
/r/MensRights28/10/22 11:30 PM
2

you still haven't posted any evidence or argument. perhaps you'd like to show us some of the alleged DMs.
/r/MensRights28/10/22 02:17 AM
6

use your time to practise socratic argument. Keep asking questions until she ties herself in knots.
/r/MensRights28/10/22 02:12 AM
17

I tried Your posting record does not bear this out. But the great majority of you is misogynistic. Evidence? You do not post on other subreddits because you know you would get backlash You cannot possibly know the reason why people might not post on other subreddits hating women perhaps you are conflating hating feminism with hating women. The former is fully justified. "superior reasoning skills" You have not presented any reasoning, just a series of statements of opinion, not argued or support…
/r/MensRights27/10/22 09:26 PM
181

The onus is on them to prove it exists. Discussing it may create the illusion that there is such a thing, but stay with saying it doesn't exist until you can show it does. It also requires a definition.
/r/MensRights27/10/22 09:14 PM
18

Actually, it does. That men are expected to be providers is a major factor in motivating them to earn more thus causing the earnings gap about which we hear so much nonsense.
/r/MensRights27/10/22 08:15 AM
6

A lot of women get trafficked and abused Evidence? where majority of who flees North Korea are women So they have the benefit of being the majority of those able to escape. they get trafficked in China being presented as “traditional wives”. How did you come to that conclusion? no it is not innate for men to protect and provide lol. Where does it not happen? Name an enduring society where it has not been the case.
/r/MensRights27/10/22 08:01 AM
14

Yet.
/r/MensRights27/10/22 04:48 AM
40

ask a feminist a question, get a bitter answer.
/r/MensRights27/10/22 04:46 AM
2

So a declining birthrate can be blamed entirely on women
/r/MensRights26/10/22 11:26 AM
1

Yep, that's what the grievance studies people showed.
/r/MensRights26/10/22 11:24 AM
-1

What lists?
/r/MensRights25/10/22 09:30 PM
4

Is your daughter safe with her?
/r/MensRights25/10/22 09:11 PM
1

No, a jury is supposed to decide whether then is any reasonable doubt and if there is, they must find the accused not guilty.
/r/MensRights25/10/22 09:19 AM
2

Why not be dishonest? What do you get out of being honest?
/r/MensRights24/10/22 11:22 AM
2

Clicking on this link gives me the following message: Firefox detected a potential security threat and did not continue to yewtu.be because this website requires a secure connection. What can you do about it? yewtu.be has a security policy called HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), which means that Firefox can only connect to it securely. You can’t add an exception to visit this site. The issue is most likely with the website, and there is nothing you can do to resolve it. If you are on a cor…
/r/MensRights24/10/22 08:20 AM
60

If they could understand it, they would protest the principle that actions have consequences because it is a form of oppression.
/r/MensRights24/10/22 07:53 AM
209

They would merely open the doors to higher levels of immigration. There isn't a World government (yet).
/r/MensRights24/10/22 07:35 AM
0

This is not a symbiotic relationship. This is someone coming here and telling us how to run our business. I hate living like this, but it's how society operates ... ​No, it's how you operate.
/r/MensRights24/10/22 02:46 AM
0

Why would you help without gaining an advantage? Because it's the right thing to do. If you do anything else, you diminish yourself as a person AND ultimately will not get the advantage you were expecting.
/r/MensRights23/10/22 11:05 PM
1

No, selling yourself cheaply, in the context I used it, means choosing to support causes not on the basis of whether you agree with them or not, but on the basis of whether you can gain an advantage from it.
/r/MensRights23/10/22 09:51 PM
22

Just a hypothetical. So it's not a fact then, it's a mere hypothesis. Hmm. This looks likes another of those posts along the lines of "I'm a gay man, why should I support a movement that's not all about gay men?" Answer: decide for yourself what you believe to be right, but do not tell us what values we should express. After writing the above, but before posting, I looked through some of your comment history and found the following: "right i agree but gay men can be very misandrist and make gene…
/r/MensRights23/10/22 11:29 AM
2

do most men who beleive in red pill stuff actually get alot of dates? I think they are probably more successful than blue pillers, but it would be very difficult to prove that. Your best bet, if you really want to know the answer, is to try out red pill ideas and see how it changes the reactions of women you come into contact with.
/r/MensRights23/10/22 11:07 AM
5

openly bought and sold on the market in many cultures Evidence please? this is something near universal if you look back far enough Again, this is an astonishing assertion that requires hard evidence. When the average women was being sold upwards of 3 times in her life Please provide some evidence for this.
/r/MensRights23/10/22 11:03 AM
1

You need a men's gathering, such as this one
/r/MensRights23/10/22 12:10 AM
19

Fun fact: the odds in Russian roulette are better than 5/6 as the loaded chamber is heavier than the other five and tends to fall to the bottom, thus not being fired. It is a freak result if it lands at the top.
/r/MensRights22/10/22 02:08 AM
161

Erin Pizzey? Edit: I told you 5 minutes before Head-Medium, he gets a "thank you very much" and I don't even get a thank you. I claim 100 victimhood points.
/r/MensRights21/10/22 02:20 PM
1

No, it isn't. And neither is it an example of the original comment.
/r/MensRights20/10/22 09:34 AM
14

The comment given as an example is: "You should watch shows like The Chi.. they are trying to push this type agendas on the youth and that’s what I don’t like..not just feminist but homosexual agendas… I don’t like when u put on t.v and push this on kids and teenagers that don’t even have they full frontal way of thinking yet at they age" This is not about homosexuality, it is about pushing an agenda on kids. It is not an example of an MRA saying gays are disgusting/repulsive.
/r/MensRights20/10/22 05:14 AM
47

Can you link to this actually happening? In 13 years of being here, I don't think I have seen it a single time. Why do you think most gay men are feminists? I don't think that and I doubt whether you have any evidence. Can you present some arguments or convincing replies that can make me stay as a MRA? You have to make that choice yourself.
/r/MensRights20/10/22 04:07 AM
1

Who would they be?
/r/MensRights18/10/22 11:48 PM
6

Meanwhile, same country, same year, Alex Belfield gets five years, not suspended, for Internet harassment.
/r/MensRights18/10/22 11:12 PM
10

You didn't answer the question, which has been asked several times on this post. What are our alleged misconceptions about feminism?
/r/MensRights18/10/22 10:56 PM
5

Modal verbs like "can" require an associated principle verb.
/r/MensRights18/10/22 10:50 PM
19

"I don't get this sub" So why are you expressing an opinion? It's like saying "I don't know anything about this, but here's what I think."
/r/MensRights18/10/22 04:25 PM
7

It depends on which country of course, but in some justice tends to be quick and efficient and probably no less accurate than in First World countries, particularly the US. Summary justice used to be quite commonplace in England until a few decades ago when it started to become dangerous to defend your own property or self.
/r/MensRights16/10/22 11:49 AM
9

In many Third World countries, a woman found to have committed paternity fraud is likely to end up getting an extra-judicial lynching and it will be accepted as appropriate practice. In the West, she might even be able to continue to extort money from the presumed father.
/r/MensRights16/10/22 11:39 AM
45

If you are British, the thing to do is to take a sample of the drink and send it to the public analyst. I don't know if any other countries have a similar system.
/r/MensRights16/10/22 10:42 AM
1

When this sort of thing is commonplace, it is a testimony to the forbearance of men that so few women end up getting killed by their partners.
/r/MensRights16/10/22 03:16 AM
11

she sees all her friends from High School doing pretending to do really cool and interesting things on Facebook
/r/MensRights16/10/22 03:04 AM
4

When I imagined you saying "it feels like she's been singled out for being a girl" I could almost hear him think "NO! It's because you are a man!" before stopping himself from saying it.
/r/MensRights15/10/22 10:32 PM
4

Posting there makes you TA.
/r/MensRights15/10/22 10:30 PM
2

We can easily go to places where our ancestors could only dream of I have had the opportunity to see many countries first hand. The only way my grandfather or his father could have done that would have been by putting on a military uniform and agreeing to follow whatever orders happened to be given. Things are not perfect and we should not ignore injustice, but at the same time we should appreciate the good things.
/r/MensRights15/10/22 09:29 AM
1

This doesn't quite answer your question, but it gives some context. Similarly here I'm on my way out now, so I regret I can't find any data to answer your question (I accept the onus is on me to do so). There may not actually be any statistics, and that may be because the Party would not like what they show.
/r/MensRights15/10/22 07:40 AM
12

Forty Shades of Harassment
/r/MensRights15/10/22 06:26 AM
5

I haven't researched this, but it would seem to me that it is highly likely you are right.
/r/MensRights15/10/22 06:22 AM
2

I imagine a similar outcome from single fathers, No, the results are not similar.
/r/MensRights15/10/22 03:22 AM
3

I can't stop because I haven't started.
/r/MensRights15/10/22 03:17 AM
5

And to undertake the work and personal development that will allow you to have stable relationships in advance of when the results will be needed?
/r/MensRights15/10/22 12:29 AM
2

This scene from The Name of The Rose explains the attempts to suppress humour by woke censors.
/r/MensRights14/10/22 11:56 PM
2

There is a lot worth reading in this, apart from the aspect OP is focussing on.
/r/MensRights14/10/22 11:26 PM
2

The patriarchy doesn't exist.
/r/MensRights14/10/22 12:09 PM
3

How to date: Never invite a woman, just say "I shall be at...on....If you want to come along you're welcome."
/r/MensRights14/10/22 09:59 AM
6

Yes, but the system is biased in favour of men who can get into prison much more easily than women. Do you have any idea how hard the patriarchy makes it for women to get into prison?
/r/MensRights14/10/22 09:57 AM
2

Use this as a learning opportunity. Plan your strategies and see how to use different approaches. My recommendation would be to try a Socratic line. Ask many questions as if you regard them as wise elders and don't argue, just keep gathering data. When they have said way more than a wise person would do, simply gather the contradictions and ask how they are resolved. Never state anything, just keep asking questions. Phrase all statements as questions (the police use this as a tactic quite freque…
/r/MensRights14/10/22 09:50 AM
6

They're going to start prosecuting bicycles for avoiding fish as well.
/r/MensRights13/10/22 09:15 PM
7

A witch hunt cannot not be a witch hunt.
/r/MensRights13/10/22 09:13 PM
2

The most dangerous person in the world is the kid who introduces his classmates to cigarettes.
/r/MensRights13/10/22 08:43 AM
6

Maybe the next version of Grammerly can use this as an example in their adverts: "This sentence is grammatically correct, but utter juvenile absurdity. Grammerly can help you avoid making a fool of yourself by writing such drivel."
/r/MensRights13/10/22 06:38 AM
2

This is so vague as to be completely worthless. Real low effort post.
/r/MensRights11/10/22 09:14 AM
2

Which important issues do they highlight? What do you see as being justification for feminist anger?
/r/MensRights10/10/22 02:15 AM
5

Of course he was around before 1900, otherwise it would not be possible to remind him of that time.
/r/MensRights09/10/22 02:37 AM
5

TIRF = This Is Really Funny.
/r/MensRights09/10/22 02:36 AM
6

This has already happened in some EU countries where women don't even have to pay taxes at all. Which ones?
/r/MensRights09/10/22 01:37 AM
1

It has been so at least since the days of Kim Philby and Don Maclean.
/r/MensRights09/10/22 01:35 AM
2

Would you like people to call you "friggin crazy"? No? Looks like you just failed to apply the Golden Rule.
/r/MensRights09/10/22 01:00 AM
0

We know an enormous amount about cancer. You can reduce your risk by an order of magnitude by good diet and lifestyle, but all the focus is on curing it when it has taken over or started to take over.
/r/MensRights09/10/22 12:38 AM
1

Ask a lawyer.
/r/MensRights08/10/22 11:50 PM
1

He called them terrorists because they planted bombs, sent letter bombs and attempted to murder politicians. Nothing to do with point of view, nothing to do with political leanings.
/r/MensRights08/10/22 11:26 PM
7

Thank you. I can't find the data you are stating in there. Can you point to it please?
/r/MensRights08/10/22 11:39 AM
7

Source please?
/r/MensRights08/10/22 10:52 AM
2

See my answer to Levi Porton above.
/r/MensRights08/10/22 08:56 AM
26

Men abused by women often don't report because either they will not get taken seriously or they will be arrested themselves. The high profile case of Depp V. Heard shows exactly how hard it is for a man to get justice even with a tidal wave of evidence on his side.
/r/MensRights08/10/22 08:44 AM
2

Same principle with the captain of a sinking ship: he is the last to leave.
/r/MensRights08/10/22 03:20 AM
25

Paul Elam was absolutely right to say if he was ever on a rape trial jury he would vote not guilty because with the evidential standards as they are, every juror has reasonable doubt about the evidence presented before them. (Not his words, but the general idea.)
/r/MensRights07/10/22 11:58 AM
3

Make up is a lie. Cosmetic surgery is a lie.
/r/MensRights07/10/22 07:58 AM
4

Everything about the "study" is dodgy from the sample size and its biased selection to the ideas used to identify someone as sexist and probably the ideology of the researchers themselves.
/r/MensRights06/10/22 05:56 PM
19

Imagine if, instead of defrauding him, she had defrauded a bank or a government department. There would be no question of her liability to pay it back.
/r/MensRights06/10/22 02:30 PM
6

I refer you to Belfort Bax's work The Fraud of Feminism published in 1908 if memory serves , which shows how even then the f movement was a sham and misrepresented gender roles the way they do now. Edit: Note, the work of Belfort Bax, also including The Legal Subjection of Men, is out of copyright and freely available on the Web. For information on the Suffragettes, read Simon Webb's The Suffragette Bombers, Britain's Forgotten Terrorists. For a view of how the feminist narrative about how women…
/r/MensRights06/10/22 12:58 PM
36

I think historically feminism has been a useful tool to get the equality we have. History has been re-written to create this common point of view.
/r/MensRights06/10/22 05:06 AM
6

where did feminism go wrong? It has never gone wrong, it was evil from the start. Men have a built in instinct to protect and provide for women. Feminism has always been the leveraging of that instinct for political ends. Contrary to popular historical revisionism, women have never been an oppressed group, they have, in fact always been privileged. Taking isolated facts about gender roles may make it seem otherwise, but men have always carried the heavier burden. feminism can be defined so many …
/r/MensRights06/10/22 12:06 AM
8

She desperately needs a sanity check.
/r/MensRights05/10/22 02:28 PM
1

What kind of damage is a chick going to do? Don't think you can appease feminists by saying that women are weak and stupid. As for workplace discrimination, do you have any evidence for your assertions?
/r/MensRights05/10/22 01:50 PM
2

Such as safety and financial independence. Men are MUCH more likely to be attacked than women. As for financial independence, what are you talking ab out?
/r/MensRights05/10/22 05:13 AM
4

You cannot control what they think. However, if you wish to learn something from this, ignore the advice about research and practice, but use it as an opportunity to get two new skills, 1. learning to control your own reactions in the face of stupidity and 2. Socratic argument. The latter is the skill of being able to ask questions so that the other person arrives at the fault in their own position without you needing to argue. Avoid the temptation to make statements, just keep asking questions …
/r/MensRights05/10/22 03:51 AM
3

In many ways there's nothing wrong with that Yes there is. There's everything wrong with it, because it immediately creates special groups which undermines the whole idea of fairness.
/r/MensRights05/10/22 12:14 AM
91

The whole concept of a hate crime is absurd. I can hate whoever I want to hate, not that hating will do me any good. A crime, however, is a whole different matter.
/r/MensRights04/10/22 02:34 PM
2

Every rape accusation is possibly false including those that lead to a conviction.
/r/MensRights04/10/22 02:32 PM
1

90-98% are true. Evidence? You seem to have started with a conclusion.
/r/MensRights04/10/22 04:23 AM
2

This is all on the absolutely false assumption that all reports are true.
/r/MensRights03/10/22 11:30 PM
5

Sources?
/r/MensRights03/10/22 02:51 PM
6

No, that is what is happening. The history of the before time is being re-written. You might like to look for the you-tuber Simon Webb who produces videos under the title History Debunked.
/r/MensRights03/10/22 02:00 AM
7

Prosecution: Do you have a penis? Defendent: yes Judge: Guilty
/r/MensRights02/10/22 11:21 AM
11

The "evidence" he sent was a single, now deleted, post from a single unidentifiable user of this sub. Hardly persuasive.
/r/MensRights02/10/22 06:08 AM
8

but a significant portion are Evidence?
/r/MensRights02/10/22 05:33 AM
1

General conspicuous spending is the short answer. But it's for fools, just like an excessive interest in fashion and looks. The advantage is to those who know what they want and do not buy stuff for status. If you want to look good: 1. Don't smoke or use hard drugs 2. get an appropriate level and sort of exercise for your age and situation 3. Eat a healthy diet without too much sugar, salt, alcohol and processed food 4. get enough sleep 5. Live with passion. No amount of fashion, cosmetics or ev…
/r/MensRights02/10/22 05:02 AM
16

As usual, it's projection. Women NORMALLY use the image of incompetence to get things done for them.
/r/MensRights02/10/22 02:53 AM
2

But also, he was a pioneer and did a lot for todays psychology and psychiatry. He was just a pioneer and did theories. He was a narcissistic fraud who made up entire theories on the basis of almost no evidence and then falsified clinical results to justify them. See here
/r/MensRights02/10/22 02:30 AM
3

When do people in men's rights groups do that? They sometimes refer to the odd assessment that women make of 80% of men being less than averagely attractive but that is a different matter.
/r/MensRights01/10/22 11:51 PM
11

Well done.
/r/MensRights01/10/22 10:19 AM
10

120 years ago, in most places, working class women could not wear pants, could not vote, could not choose to remain unmarried, could not join most professions, could not receive education. More falsehood than fact here.
/r/MensRights01/10/22 10:18 AM
15

I think modern western society has over compensated for the chauvinism pervasive in the decades prior to the 1970s and now they want to castrate men. The ALLEGED chauvinism. It's a false accusation.
/r/MensRights01/10/22 10:16 AM
2

You might like to give examples of all these assertions.
/r/MensRights01/10/22 01:50 AM
8

If you equate Peterson with Tate, you are probably not understanding him.
/r/MensRights01/10/22 01:49 AM
41

Identify as a woman and go along.
/r/MensRights29/09/22 10:25 AM
-2

Link?
/r/MensRights29/09/22 09:31 AM
791

Her student lawyer friend Not your friend. Not an expert. What do I need to do to protect myself? A good lawyer, the will to fight. She says she doesn't want to screw you over, but she's already taken your life savings. If it all goes wrong, you can live very well on very little, in a country like Australia. Don't let it destroy you spiritually as well as financially.
/r/MensRights28/09/22 09:01 AM
2

Evidence by citation is not necessarily the truth. Do a search for grievance studies to see how utter nonsense gets passed off as research which can then be used in citations.
/r/MensRights27/09/22 05:06 AM
2

Racism is when you have a bigoted point of view related to race. Like your post and the article it links to.
/r/MensRights27/09/22 05:03 AM
1

Which was a good thing. Children need their mothers and not daycare. And it was a good situation for the mothers too if the father supported them.
/r/MensRights26/09/22 09:17 PM
4

LOL
/r/MensRights26/09/22 10:47 AM
4

Being married to someone you can’t escape is not a privilege and if you woke up in 1904 as a woman, you would hate how little freedom you have. And yet unmarried women were always very keen to get married. That seems a little odd if marriage was such an abomination for them.
/r/MensRights26/09/22 10:16 AM
7

Yes, women always had more privileges than men. It is part of the species' instinct to protect and provide for them. It really is that simple. Take a look around you and compare what you see to what you hear and read. If you only had the media reports to go on, you would think that women have it very hard in modern society. Why, when you only have reports from far off times and places would you believe they are any more true than the picture you would get from indirect sources today?
/r/MensRights26/09/22 10:10 AM
5

it is credited today as the cause of the women's movement. Source? I can't find any evidence for that. Not liking the double standard or trying to re-write history is not how we do this. It appears to be what you are doing. but this is not a fairytale Yes, it is. Men have always protected and provided for women, who have always been relatively privileged. Historical revisionism, into which you seem to by buying, functions by taking isolated facts (and fictions) out of context.
/r/MensRights26/09/22 10:09 AM
7

Women were not given any well paying jobs in the 70s. That might be the problem: they expected to be given them. Or: they preferred the husband to earn a family wage and live off it, which seems very likely. As Simone de Beauvoir infamously said "the option to stay at home should not be given to women as too many of them would make that choice." The idea that women were prevented from working is a re-writing of history.
/r/MensRights26/09/22 09:44 AM
5

few women had that for centuries. Source?
/r/MensRights26/09/22 09:40 AM
7

Slap the secretary on the ass as she walks by, be waiting with his dinner on the table and a martini when he gets home. And if it were the other way round it would be "she had to spend all day at work and all he had to do was prepare dinner." Blind in one eye or what? The Triangle Shirtwaist fire was an industrial accident, 23 men were also killed. I'm not sure it had very much to do with the women's suffrage movement, although it did have an effect on employment regulations. The women's suffrag…
/r/MensRights26/09/22 09:39 AM
2

The only gripe I have with the new way of allowing maternity leave is that it always seemed like once a female teacher started having kids, they'd have 2 or 3 and not be back teaching for 5 years, all the while earning a full wage from the public sector. This is one of the main reasons you will see more female teachers in Ireland than men. Society wasn't built in a way that allowed 2 parents to go out and work Actually, it was. See my previous comment.
/r/MensRights26/09/22 08:46 AM
15

Many women couldn't vote until very recently, as their countries lagged behind in social progress. In Portugal it wasn't until the 1970s when women were given the right to vote. In most places, universal female suffrage arrived within a few years of universal male suffrage, although concomitant female military obligations were a bit slower in arriving.' Women have never been prevented from working. Edit: your statement about Portugal is, at best, a partial truth.
/r/MensRights26/09/22 08:46 AM
3

since childcare services were non existent They weren't needed in societies with extended families and communities, just as they are not needed in "developing" countries today.
/r/MensRights26/09/22 08:43 AM
5

With comedians being cancelled for offensive jokes, circuses could be next.
/r/MensRights26/09/22 05:17 AM
5

TLDR: sociologists are allowed to be racist because they need to do so to push their opinions.
/r/MensRights26/09/22 04:14 AM
6

No, it's unnecessarily wordy. But no supporting facts. It's all evidence by citation.
/r/MensRights26/09/22 04:12 AM
7

No, it doesn't. It simply makes a series of statements of opinion.
/r/MensRights26/09/22 04:11 AM
25

Except women have never not had the ability to earn money. They have lacked the obligation to do so, but not the right.
/r/MensRights26/09/22 04:10 AM
79

I think women were treated lesser than before this societal era Feminists have successfully propagated this belief, but I never see evidence for it. Why do you believe this?
/r/MensRights26/09/22 12:12 AM
12

The whole thing is about white women as a group. All thirteen pages of it is racist drivel.
/r/MensRights26/09/22 12:09 AM
9

Right from the start the article can be seen to be: 1. Unnecessarily wordy. 2. Reliant on in-group assumptions and jargon 3. A series of opinions masquerading as research and supported only by other "research" in the same field which is grievance studies. I cannot find a single real world fact in the entire text which relies completely on evidence by citation such as "as I have argued elsewhere", or "someone somewhere has said".
/r/MensRights25/09/22 11:56 PM
7

No, it comes from the harm that false accusations do.
/r/MensRights25/09/22 11:49 PM
5

That's two hours of your life you're never getting back.
/r/MensRights25/09/22 01:12 PM
19

There are surveys that found higher rates of sexual assault between inmates in women's prisons compared to men's. Implying that female inmates are more abusive than male inmates (or they can get away with more). Therefore, illogically, they should be free to assault the public at large.
/r/MensRights25/09/22 11:32 AM
6

Well society demands that they don't have bad breath and oral hygiene equipment costs money. You're putting ideas into their heads here.
/r/MensRights25/09/22 04:30 AM
7

"If I had to pay to have these jobs done, I'd pay a man and have them done properly" satirist William Donaldson writing under the name Henry Roots.
/r/MensRights25/09/22 04:28 AM
2

And what does this post have to do with men's rights or discrimination?
/r/MensRights25/09/22 04:26 AM
1

I apologise. Frequently, there are people who write incomprehensible posts whose first language is English.
/r/MensRights25/09/22 01:06 AM
1

Did I need the "/s"?
/r/MensRights24/09/22 11:53 PM
6

Thank you for your wisdom. It's a long time since I have met anyone who can speak for the entire world with such authority.
/r/MensRights24/09/22 01:44 PM
1

Big deal. Men are responsible for supporting everyone and building everything as well as performing all military duties. Not really balanced by a fashion limitation.
/r/MensRights24/09/22 01:44 PM
3

No, you didn't understand because that is NOT what I said.
/r/MensRights24/09/22 11:39 AM
2

Yes, because women don't have the same responsibilities as men: equal rights + lesser responsibilities = better situation.
/r/MensRights24/09/22 11:38 AM
1

I just couldn't understand what you wanted to say.
/r/MensRights24/09/22 11:37 AM
11

Perhaps you should read my comment and understand it before answering.
/r/MensRights24/09/22 11:30 AM
2

When you can rearrange letters to make a word, it is called an anagram. What is it called when you can rearrange words to make a sentence?
/r/MensRights24/09/22 11:27 AM
6

Feminism was always about privilege. There was never a time when it was about equality.
/r/MensRights24/09/22 11:26 AM
3

That would include all those feminazis who think killing their unborn babies shows strength and independence. They are are definitely "non-birthing persons."
/r/MensRights24/09/22 11:25 AM
10

If several men were killed for defending her, then yes. Sarcasm is wasted when it is actually true; if you say "yeah, and I suppose you can get burned by fire", all that happens is that you end up looking stupid.
/r/MensRights24/09/22 11:23 AM
12

Ah, but those men only do it because they want to perve over the women's faces.
/r/MensRights24/09/22 10:27 AM
31

The US circumcision business turns over in excess of $400, 000, 000 p.a. That is enough to buy a lot of lies and a lot of propaganda masquerading as science.
/r/MensRights24/09/22 10:27 AM
2

Christy Brown Stephen Hawking Helen Keller I particularly recommend Keller's autobiography, which is easily available as it is in the public domain. Happiness is in the spirit, not the body. I wish you well.
/r/MensRights24/09/22 09:49 AM
5

No. That would be cowardly.
/r/MensRights24/09/22 09:16 AM
14

Far more men are executed under Sharia law and Middle Eastern governance and culture. Men are the victims of more honor killings much than women, even if the direct cause is not failing to cover up. It is usually homosexuality, which is overlooked in the case of females but brutally punished in males. No, it is not true that women are killed due to misogyny and men are not killed due to misandry. See here. Feminist stories are no more true in far off times and places than they are in the modern …
/r/MensRights24/09/22 09:15 AM
13

Perhaps you can provide some evidence for her original statement.
/r/MensRights24/09/22 07:33 AM
5

Part of the Abrahamic obsession with circumcision is that it was a sign of slavery; you circumcised your slaves to show your power. Later, it was converted into a sign of submission to God.
/r/MensRights24/09/22 06:35 AM
28

Men are far more likely to be murdered than women. She did lie.
/r/MensRights24/09/22 05:28 AM
13

"I've got better things to do with my time than argue about your fantasist theories." See this link for an understanding of female confabulations: https://old.reddit.com/r/TheRedPill/comments/xibb69/women_live_in_a_neurotic_hell/.
/r/MensRights24/09/22 01:56 AM
3

He should get a better job. Like managing a store. Then he can select and hire and fire on merit.
/r/MensRights23/09/22 05:21 AM
1

I'm not saying that. I'm saying he should work on his own personal situation before trying to change the world.
/r/MensRights23/09/22 04:47 AM
-6

No, it isn't. If he can do better, he should leave the job. Pick your battles and win them. Otherwise, use this as an exercise in learning how to deal with such situations. Record, complain properly in writing, follow up on complaints, take legal action. If it's worth it.
/r/MensRights23/09/22 04:22 AM
-19

Yes, it is. Equality is a foolish idea. Negotiate your pay depending on what you are worth. Or suck it up.
/r/MensRights23/09/22 02:10 AM
10

They can result in death.
/r/MensRights23/09/22 12:29 AM
7

Ask yourself the following questions: Where do I want to be in 5 years' time? Where do I want to be in 10/20 years' time? What sort of life do I want to look back on when I am 70? Start working towards those goals and do not get bogged down in the petty stuff which will not help you achieve them.
/r/MensRights23/09/22 12:06 AM
-4

Have you come across the skeptic's annotated bible. Takes the donkey work out of thinking critically about the Bible.
/r/MensRights21/09/22 05:00 AM
2

In almost all settings female dress requirements are less restrictive than the Male equivalent. In what formal situation is a man able to dress exposing arms legs or shoulders. There are a few exceptions, but the norm is that men have very little choice while women have a lot.
/r/MensRights20/09/22 01:55 PM
12

What are the viable concerns of feminism?
/r/MensRights20/09/22 01:32 AM
1

It depends on what is meant by victim-blaming. Is this victim blaming for example?
/r/MensRights15/09/22 11:04 AM
8

Unless you're having sex with her, she is just one of the lads as far as your concerned.
/r/MensRights15/09/22 08:56 AM
2

No, men built machines so successfully that most men who don't go to the gym are are suffering from muscular atrophy.
/r/MensRights15/09/22 08:52 AM
2

They would have to flex their muscles since machinery would no longer get made and industry would collapse. It the same as if the ancient Britons were to ask "What if the Romans all went home?". We know the answer to that one: dark times ensued.
/r/MensRights15/09/22 08:51 AM
6

"If an unmarried mother can put bread on her table without relying on a man's paycheck, who would criticize her? " I would, as I would criticise anyone who thinks that a father is nothing but a paycheck. Have to comment here, since comments are disabled under the article itself.
/r/MensRights15/09/22 08:44 AM
3

It's rare that someone this crazy can write so articulately, which raises doubts in my mind about the authenticity of this.
/r/MensRights15/09/22 08:41 AM
7

Is there anyone who would like to post the regular "why can't MRAs work with feminists, after all, we all want equality?" line here?
/r/MensRights15/09/22 08:31 AM
2

What's the probability of her having a successful and healthy man-free relationship? I'd say possible, but highly improbable.
/r/MensRights15/09/22 08:29 AM
2

Go to a country where 5 ft 5 is average. Work on yourself in every other way. Travel alone following your own route. Join a men's support group.
/r/MensRights13/09/22 12:28 PM
4

If you have a lease, it is not "your own". Your own is when you have freehold.
/r/TheRedPill12/09/22 09:06 AM
258

Your game needs work. Also, you are not that physically attractive otherwise girls would be approaching you.
/r/MensRights12/09/22 08:56 AM
1

The difference is that you can compare colors whereas you cannot compare what it would be like to be intact with being circumcised since you have no experience of the former. As for not wanting to hurt people's feelings, go and watch a baby screaming as part of his penis is cut off.
/r/MensRights12/09/22 04:10 AM
2

She said domestic abuse continued to make up 18 per cent of all recorded crime in England and Wales and last year there were almost 200,000 sex offences reported and more than 70,000 rapes. This may say more about the way police handle complaints than anything else. I suspect people trying to report burglaries, for instance, get every possible block put in their way to make them stop.
/r/MensRights11/09/22 10:52 AM
5

Travel. Alone in far off places on the cheap. Join a men's support group. Do a websearch for "men's support groups (your area)" Read the book "What you can change and what you can't" by Martin Seligman.
/r/MensRights11/09/22 06:05 AM
1

A distance degree is a good option, if, and only if, you have the self discipline to do it. If you do, the savings in terms of relocation, attendance in classes, cost and the amount of crap you have to put up with are enormous. Attendance based degrees, except when there is no alternative, as in medicine, are for people who need to be chaperoned through things.
/r/MensRights11/09/22 05:32 AM
3

That's a very simplistic view.
/r/MensRights11/09/22 01:29 AM
7

I'd rather be circumcised than not How do you know? You have never experienced the sensations.
/r/MensRights10/09/22 09:32 AM
5

Yes, her weekly meetings with the prime minister had no purpose. No one ever did, or did not do, anything with an eye on the honours list. Her enormous wealth had no effect on anyone else. The removal of the Gough Whitlam government was entirely the decision of John, later Sir John, Kerr. But she didn't really exercise any power. Not.
/r/MensRights10/09/22 06:22 AM
10

Anything you are not concerned about personally is not a big deal for you. But deciding that it is not a big deal for everyone on that basis is a level of solipsism you should be ashamed of.
/r/MensRights10/09/22 01:33 AM
8

No, but rabbis are.
/r/MensRights10/09/22 01:20 AM
6

On the other hand, getting your child tattooed is illegal in some places so parental consent is not an issue there.
/r/MensRights10/09/22 01:13 AM
5

That is a question that requires an answer. Please do not ignore dr.
/r/MensRights10/09/22 01:12 AM
14

Simply ask any woman you work with/go to school with and you'll find out why I'm correct. How do you know what they would say? And even if they did say "I prefer circumcised penises" would infant fgm be justified by my saying "I prefer mutilated vaginas"?
/r/MensRights10/09/22 01:02 AM
2

I will never be president, because Americans hate people who aren't citizens of the US.
/r/MensRights08/09/22 04:10 AM
2

Americans don't know what a woman is apparently. Is AOC one?
/r/MensRights08/09/22 04:09 AM
33

No, people who are appointed on the basis of quotas are not the most qualified.
/r/MensRights07/09/22 01:15 AM
11

an effective method is demonstrated at 0:56 here
/r/MensRights06/09/22 02:38 PM
1

Reminds me of Netflix's "Bad Vegan."
/r/MensRights04/09/22 11:53 PM
3

Germain Greer in "The Whole Woman" talks about how shopping is work the burden of which falls unfairly on women.
/r/MensRights04/09/22 01:00 AM
2

Depends on, among other things, what is meant by "success".
/r/MensRights03/09/22 11:55 PM
4

"We graduated and soon I am going to learn how to write better than a sixth grader."
/r/MensRights02/09/22 10:52 PM
1

Women's sentences should be strictly limited. A ten word maximum should be enforced. Also there should be a compulsory ad break every three minutes.
/r/MensRights02/09/22 08:06 AM
1

The link has been deleted.
/r/MensRights02/09/22 07:59 AM
6

They don't think it affects them, but it will.
/r/MensRights01/09/22 11:08 AM
16

Something that ALLEGEDLY happened.
/r/MensRights01/09/22 09:25 AM
1

In 2019 live births in the US 3.75 million, abortions 887,000. That means 80.8% of pregnant women keeping their babies, in the middle of the range for those where were pregnant due to an assault. Her data is seriously unlikely. Additionally, I would ask how one gets a 10% range in a survey of 37 (!) women. Edit: A little bit more research shows she is pushing an anti-abortion agenda.
/r/MensRights31/08/22 06:42 AM
2

Equality is an abstract concept, it cannot be quantified and the question is an absurdity.
/r/MensRights31/08/22 06:31 AM
2

And they turned their backs on the most credible of sources, Mr Julian Assange. Disgraceful!
/r/MensRights31/08/22 06:28 AM
1

This appears to be from a special interest group who cite no sources or any kind of evidence.
/r/MensRights31/08/22 06:25 AM
1

Where are you getting your stats and other information from?
/r/MensRights30/08/22 09:13 PM
1

You should just laugh at her. Learn the techniques of agree and amplify or amused mastery. Seriously, don't give this kind of idiocy the time of day.
/r/MensRights29/08/22 11:11 PM
2

There is an innate instinct for men to provide for and protect women. Feminism is the leverage of that instinct for perverse ends. There has never been any need for it and it has never been a good idea.
/r/MensRights29/08/22 11:05 PM
1

I accept your apology.
/r/MensRights29/08/22 12:00 PM
1

No, I didn't change anything. Your original comment, which I cut and pasted was ambiguous. If you had any decency at all, you would apologise.
/r/MensRights29/08/22 10:43 AM
1

You haven't quoted me I quoted you exactly: that's what happens when you cut and paste. Your own words are not clear, I cut and paste again: "If you wouldn't vote for a candidate because they're a woman, then it's hard to say you're not causing a shift to male only representatives". This is ambiguous and the ambiguity is entirely yours. Possible meaning 1: By refusing any possibility of voting for a female candidate etc. Possible meaning 2: By not automatically voting for a female candidate etc.…
/r/MensRights29/08/22 10:13 AM
1

Your first point is a contradiction How exactly? your inverted double quote marks They are called inverted commas (UK) or quotation marks (US). It certainly is you I'm quoting since I copied and pasted from your post. My answer is indeed a bit of a mess, but that is because of your words which I quoted. The word question can refer to an issue so that the first issue would be concerning voting for a woman on the basis of her gender and the second issue, referred by me as a question, is why do we …
/r/MensRights29/08/22 08:57 AM
1

I went to the supermarket today and I noticed that women have nearly all the food.
/r/MensRights29/08/22 07:40 AM
1

If you wouldn't vote for a candidate because they're a woman, then it's hard to say you're not causing a shift to male only representatives. No, it's easy: "you're not causing a shift to male only representatives (just because you wouldn't vote for a candidate just because she is a woman)." Question 2 why do we care whether there is a shift in the gender make up of parliaments?
/r/MensRights29/08/22 07:39 AM
2

The electorate is more heavily skewed than that, because women live longer and only over 18s can vote. Additionally, you cannot vote if you are incarcerated and the great majority of prisoners are men.
/r/MensRights29/08/22 07:37 AM
3

In any job and any situation it's always worth making a proactive effort to get on with people. Failing to do so will produce results out of proportion to the effort acquiring the habit requires. It's not rocket science, but even in that field it is necessary to get on well with people.
/r/MensRights29/08/22 07:35 AM
0

How about any woman who ditches her husband while she has a child is abusive, narcissistic, selfish, irresponsible, and a genuine force for evil on this planet. That never happens. It's always the men who are violent. /s
/r/MensRights29/08/22 07:09 AM
2

Links for what? The propagation of not quite correct and not well referenced information.
/r/MensRights28/08/22 12:32 PM
2

A man get in trouble no one will help him. As Julian Assange has found out. It is shameful the way the Australian government has ignored him. This is why men are destined to lose the gender war, it’s not men vs woman, it’s 100% of woman No, it's the loudest 10% of women. Most women do not support feminism and do not wish to make war on men. if you wanted to marry a woman, and have kids, and pass your genes, you need to lick her feet, and be her simp, and give her you soul. Bullshit. The great ma…
/r/MensRights28/08/22 11:11 AM
15

not quite correct and often not well referenced information gets propagated Examples and links please? The UN equality index model has been criticized a lot, but because there is no academia voices that can tear it down, and just sociology savvy men online, we cannot push a better model Given that complete bias towards women has an equality rating of perfect zero, no model at all is better than the UN shambles
/r/MensRights28/08/22 11:05 AM
9

And feminists don't control private companies. They don't control ALL private companies, but they do control some, e.g. The Guardian Newspaper, Disney, Google. They also control most universities and have successfully shut down that as a route for non-feminists such as Peter Boghossian.
/r/MensRights28/08/22 06:54 AM
14

There is plenty of video of feminists trying to shut down, interrupting and picketing JBP's appearances. Cancel culture is a fact and feminists are a big part of those pushing it, otherwise it would not be people who speak up for men who are the main victims.
/r/MensRights28/08/22 06:27 AM
18

Never heard of cancel culture? Ever see videos of protests where JBP is speaking? Examples of feminist attempts to stop free speech abound.
/r/MensRights28/08/22 06:12 AM
2

what OP is suggesting- write in to law that certian companies are forbidden from hiring people of certian genders Not at all, he is quite clear in what he is saying, that is to abolish legislation prohibiting people from discriminating on gender.
/r/MensRights28/08/22 02:40 AM
2

And if the company loses profits because of legislation telling them who they must hire, then certain people are still excluded from higher paying jobs, which will no longer exist.
/r/MensRights28/08/22 01:50 AM
1

This is not even an unrealistic scenario. It is the exact case for many of the celebrity victims of false accusations.
/r/MensRights28/08/22 12:50 AM
1

The Rebecca Solnit story is absurd. 1. The accusation was made against the host of the party, who would presumably know who she was, unless she was a gatecrasher. 2. The dialogue is unrealistic to an extreme degree "Have you heard about that new very important book (Her own)... 3. Rebecca Solnit is a feminist who says things like “I am a woman who during my youth thought it likely that I would be raped and maybe also murdered and all my life have lived in a world where women were raped and murde…
/r/MensRights28/08/22 12:29 AM
5

What happens if one of the one-gender companies is performing much better and therfore can pay more? That company thrives and pays more tax. The other companies have to lift their game.
/r/MensRights28/08/22 12:13 AM
7

And patriarchy in general, which is where the father is the head of the household.
/r/MensRights28/08/22 12:10 AM
1

Which things?
/r/MensRights28/08/22 12:00 AM
1

The Rebecca Solnit story which was obviously made up or at least distorted.
/r/MensRights27/08/22 11:59 PM
24

While women get benefits to help them if they cannot do so, men get prison (in the US) as is demonstrated by this article.
/r/MensRights27/08/22 09:11 AM
9

He can.
/r/MensRights27/08/22 08:24 AM
2

It was relevant for that specific event. Which specific event are you referring to? Searches produce different results.
/r/MensRights27/08/22 07:34 AM
1

many things are easier. Which things?
/r/MensRights27/08/22 07:32 AM
1

If a woman is raped, she has the option of plan B, abortion, adoption or abandonment. Why would anyone voluntarily give birth to a baby conceived by rape? Refusing fathers the possibility of custody because of a rape allegation is a recipe for promoting false accusations.
/r/MensRights27/08/22 06:49 AM
39

Perhaps Joe should consider forgiving child support debt instead of university debts.
/r/MensRights27/08/22 06:37 AM
14

Biggest problem is that people in general have become more self-centred and entitled, among other negative characteristics. Forming relationships is therefore more difficult. All other factors (the rise of the Net, changes in protocols) are more or less irrelevant and changes of venue e.g. from night "clubs" to online are pretty much insignificant. So, what to do? Same old boring advice: 1. work on yourself and be the best you can be 2. learn to recognise red flags and act on them and 3. Learn g…
/r/MensRights27/08/22 01:12 AM
1

How about being given some Hershey bars and told that only 30% of them are made with real vomit?
/r/MensRights26/08/22 03:16 PM
2

Are you sure about this? My understanding is that polls consistently show a higher proportion of women being opposed to abortions.
/r/MensRights26/08/22 02:47 PM
3

I wasn't saying "yes" I was saying "if". Run it through Google translate into Spanish: No estaba diciendo "sí", estaba diciendo "si"
/r/MensRights26/08/22 02:32 PM
1

I hope this place loses business. It will.
/r/MensRights25/08/22 11:42 PM
4

Everyone should have freedom to do what they want (as long as legal) out of the job. No, some people have jobs that require high standards of behaviour at at all times e.g. judges, senior politicians and clergy.
/r/MensRights25/08/22 11:36 PM
3

The charge was not murder it was causing death by dangerous driving.
/r/MensRights25/08/22 11:28 PM
7

I assume the club is unable to get enough women in, so like a pandering simp they are trying this. It will mean that: 1. Girls will not be particularly attracted to the venue and 2. guys will also give it a miss. Another woke business looks as if it will be going under. Edit: of course, if they see the crowds flocking to leave quickly enough, they might reverse the policy. And then guys will make a thing of staring excessively because they can. And the place will still end up failing.
/r/MensRights25/08/22 02:33 PM
3

not responsible for the horrible things ALLEGEDLY done in the past
/r/MensRights23/08/22 03:30 PM
1

It will be fun to know what happens to her over the next twenty years? Anyone like to hazard a guess?
/r/MensRights23/08/22 03:28 PM
1

So who is a "real' feminist then? Edit: I'm still waiting for names here.
/r/MensRights22/08/22 02:45 PM
8

Give him a doll to play with.
/r/MensRights21/08/22 12:46 AM
2

Well done for taking my comment like that. May I suggest that you start making the practice of self-control your normal habit. It requires a bit of effort. Eckhart Tolle's practices outlined in the Power of Now are a good place to start. Perhaps also watch some videos of Jordan Peterson or Jacob Rees Mogg to see how experts in staying reasonable under pressure do it.
/r/MensRights21/08/22 12:45 AM
1

No, it isn't, it's far too logical for that.
/r/MensRights21/08/22 12:43 AM
2

It's actually quite a reasonable article written by someone who has started to grow up a bit late. Her suggested advice to young girls is also very sensible. However she also insists that she is still a feminist while also saying "Monogamous marriage is by far the most stable and reliable foundation on which to build a family." She obviously has yet to understand the seriously dark side of feminism and simply ignores it when she reads those feminists militating for the destruction of the family …
/r/MensRights21/08/22 12:42 AM
2

Consider what happens if an MRA posts in a place like XX; the post gets removed or they get banned. Now consider what happens when feminists post here: usually, they are met with polite, reasoned rebuttals and, unable to discuss at the level required, they delete the posts themselves. This sort of pattern tends to be reflected in real life as well.
/r/MensRights21/08/22 12:35 AM
2

Or "Thank you for sharing. Your opinion IS important to me."
/r/MensRights21/08/22 12:30 AM
5

You should have agreed and amplified. Or practised the art of amused mastery. Your response did not solve anything except to put you on her level.
/r/MensRights21/08/22 12:30 AM
0

Perhaps you should read the article again. It explains why feminist theory should apply at all times and that there could be no counter examples if it were true. Hence there can be no arguments based on selection bias.
/r/MensRights21/08/22 12:15 AM
8

You'd be paying for the date though (she's a little short on cash right at the moment), and you might not get let in anywhere. Also, having started by biting fingers off, you have to ask what she might do next. And wear dark glasses to protect your eyes from her psycho stare.
/r/MensRights20/08/22 12:02 PM
-10

Oh, I thought it was like the traffic lights that go amber to warn you to speed up as it's about to go red. Actually, I did think it was to do with the colour, as it is in some places, and checked on the Amber Hagerman story. Horrific! Incidentally, I really did look at the title and my eyes jumped to the capitalised words and I immediately thought of the narcissist (former) actress.
/r/MensRights20/08/22 11:45 AM
1

No.
/r/MensRights20/08/22 11:22 AM
-35

Why have you put a capital letter at the start of the word "amber?" At first glance I thought this was about warning Canadians when someone like Amber Heard is around.
/r/MensRights20/08/22 11:09 AM
1

I'm okay with gender roles. They worked well for me, supporting my wife as a full-time mother to our kids. On mine sites, many of the men doing the FIFO work are there to support their families and are happy with it as long as there is some kind of reciprocity.
/r/MensRights20/08/22 11:06 AM
2

Thinking children deserve full time mums is not the same thing as telling women at work they should just go home and be mums instead. Work is not really a place for expressing such points of view.
/r/MensRights20/08/22 10:57 AM
1

"Women in today’s society value money and material items over raising their children" This seems to be increasingly common in a way that would not have been tolerated 50 years ago. We really have reached a point where woman want to do absolutely nothing that isn't about them. This is one I don't agree with. It applies to a small minority of women, mainly quite young, who will probably grow out of it. The person who said it is, however, entitled to his opinion, and should speak so as to reflect w…
/r/MensRights20/08/22 10:43 AM
5

"A woman can literally have access to more resources than any one human being could ever run through in their lifetime; have the ability to live a life of unmatched leisure, and still complain about “society” and “oppression”. It’s a cult." Not about all women; this is about the possibility of "A woman" doing that, in the context of a perfect example. "The influx of women into the labour force is effectively what halved wages and the average couple can’t afford a home and family anymore even if …
/r/MensRights20/08/22 10:30 AM
11

But if it keeps being so "I hate what some women do, so I hate all women" No it doesn't.
/r/MensRights20/08/22 10:23 AM
1

Simply because of their gender. No, because they can't compete. And we don’t have a chance to ever close that gap due to biology. Life's not fair. Most of us worked that out as children. If you think "fair" means everyone should have an equal opportunity in everything, your ruminations are going to make life very unpleasant for you.
/r/MensRights20/08/22 07:29 AM
4

Would you like to make the comparison with men's rights that was required by the question?
/r/MensRights20/08/22 07:13 AM
2

Your percentages are irrelevant. Usain Bolt at his best was only 40% faster than me at my best over 100m. Is it absurd that I can't make 60% of what he makes out of my mediocre athleticism. Obviously, it doesn't work like that. Whose argument is stupid? And the question remains, where is the money going to come from to pay all of these women very much more than they actually bring in through ticket sales, sponsorship and the rest? And the world lightweight boxing champion only gets a fraction of…
/r/MensRights20/08/22 07:13 AM
7

I guess, we can't deny women had a crappy deal back then You guessed wrong. There is no evidence to say they were oppressed, only re-writings of history to take isolated circumstances out of context. See here to get a savage destruction of the general feminist misrepresentation of the past.
/r/MensRights20/08/22 06:59 AM
14

Read the Declaration of Sentiments from the Seneca Falls Convention 1848. It shows that feminism was not about equality even back then. The behaviour of Suffragettes in the White Feather Campaign also attests to them not being about equality.
/r/MensRights20/08/22 05:40 AM
8

Under certain circumstances, men have the right to go topless whereas women don't. In some far off times or places where gender roles were quite rigid, there were/are restrictions on women as part of the deal. For example, as part of the deal of joint parenthood, the wife's fidelity is/has been more strictly enforced than that of her husband. In the West, currently, there are no women's rights that are lacking.
/r/MensRights20/08/22 05:05 AM
1

It's for the employers to decide. It's their profits which are affected.
/r/MensRights20/08/22 01:01 AM
11

"Karma is patient." So much in 3 words.
/r/MensRights20/08/22 12:59 AM
2

No, but I have been a bit of an arsehole sometimes. That's as close as I can get.
/r/MensRights20/08/22 12:55 AM
25

Feminism was never about equality.
/r/MensRights20/08/22 12:54 AM
24

There used to be an expression "famous for being famous". It could be replaced now with "famous for being a narcissistic nonentity."
/r/MensRights20/08/22 12:52 AM
3

Legendary = not actually true
/r/MensRights20/08/22 12:50 AM
1

That's debatable.
/r/MensRights20/08/22 12:15 AM
5

But still you can’t deny that it’s sort of unfair at it’s core. Yes, I can. Women are simply not as good as men at sports. They therefore earn less. Nothing unfair about that. While as women if you want to earn a lot you have to be really pretty or a prn star Or you could equip yourself with valuable skills and use them. Same as for men.
/r/MensRights20/08/22 12:15 AM
1

No, it hasn't. It has been the result of tests carried out because there was doubt to start with.
/r/MensRights20/08/22 12:13 AM
5

So you wish to debate this? That would prove my statement that it's debatable.
/r/MensRights19/08/22 11:03 PM
4

So who should pay them? And with what money? Do they bring in the ticket sales and the sponsorship?
/r/MensRights19/08/22 10:50 PM
2

Germany was run by a right wing Nazi. That's debatable; he called himself a socialist, thus he was left wing.
/r/MensRights19/08/22 10:29 PM
1

The 1%.
/r/MensRights19/08/22 10:20 PM
1

The report debunks those statistics. If you actually believe figures of 30% and 28% represent the general population, you are living in a world of make-believe.
/r/MensRights19/08/22 07:56 AM
7

So the links are....?
/r/MensRights19/08/22 07:52 AM
4

The statement "in many places": are you saying many places in this sub or many places in general?
/r/MensRights19/08/22 06:52 AM
8

That's the modus operandi of religious cults. Scientists, and reasonable people, require evidence and details. Educational conversation, by its nature, involves verifying facts.
/r/MensRights19/08/22 06:51 AM
1

Maybe she mixed her words up and meant to say "feminist cinema is too stupid for men to enjoy."
/r/MensRights19/08/22 06:45 AM
11

The spending an hour here and the seeing the phrase 5-7 times are probably two unlinked propositions.
/r/MensRights19/08/22 06:21 AM
70

I begged, I pleaded, etc. I took flowers, she insulted them. Mistake. Let her see that you have options. Get on with your life. Ignore her. Pick up a younger woman. Desire is not negotiable, but it can be triggered.
/r/MensRights18/08/22 09:37 AM
1

You've never lived outside your own country have you? Which country are you talking about? Where are you getting your information from?
/r/MensRights18/08/22 07:37 AM
1

Idiocy Quotient?
/r/MensRights18/08/22 07:16 AM
4

Wow! This post has remained up a whole 8 hours. Trolls usually delete such posts as soon as they realise they will not provoke an absurd reaction. How long do ya reckon this one's gonna last?
/r/MensRights18/08/22 07:05 AM
9

Isn't Christianity based on the concept of "original sin", i.e. that we are all born guilty?
/r/MensRights18/08/22 07:01 AM
4

Do you think women actually want simps?
/r/MensRights18/08/22 07:00 AM
2

Bad things happen. But these are rare. The truth is women historically and contemporarily have been keen to get married, it often being the major goal of their lives. Even in the past when, it is frequently and wrongly alleged that wives were mere chattels, finding a husband was a major goal throughout all social classes. If you believe otherwise, you have been conned by a modern re-writing of history.
/r/MensRights18/08/22 06:57 AM
2

At a cost very much less than the benefits.
/r/MensRights17/08/22 09:08 PM
4

Also being left-handed is the most right-handed thing you can do. Think about it. By using your left hand, you free up your right hand for doing so many other things. With that extra availability, the power of your right hand is increased enormously. Also wrong is the new right.
/r/MensRights17/08/22 11:10 AM
1

I posted the following on dating_advice and got temporarily banned, thus showing you what they don't want you to know: Work on yourself. Learn some red pill. Get into great physical shape. Build a career. Be the best you can be. They'll come.
/r/MensRights17/08/22 11:01 AM
1

You seem to be under the illusion that women used to have it worse than men. Women, at almost all times and places, have been privileged.
/r/MensRights17/08/22 09:06 AM
3

they want to be your equal. Until the ship starts sinking.
/r/MensRights17/08/22 08:52 AM
4

Record. Get proof.
/r/MensRights17/08/22 08:32 AM
2

You need to be more specific. Link the specific evidence, as I did. Directly and without sign up obligations or paywalls. At this stage, both you and I, and everyone following this thread, know that you don't actually have the evidence.
/r/MensRights16/08/22 09:07 PM
4

And what happens in the rare cases of hospital swaps? Does she say "well, that's not what being a mother is about?" And why, if this is the case do women ever go through the terrible ordeal of pregnancy instead of simply adopting. Her position is simply too easy to find the faults in.
/r/MensRights16/08/22 10:41 AM
0

From a non-random sample of tests. It has no bearing on the general population, which is what your original comment referred to. Do you, or do you not, have links which base their statistics on random, representative samples?
/r/MensRights16/08/22 09:54 AM
1

Perhaps you can cite and link them.
/r/MensRights16/08/22 09:33 AM
0

Just for the record, the implied situation is estimated to be at least 10% in the Western world. By whom? Not by reliable researchers. There is a common view that misattributed paternity is widespread in Western societies, between ten and 30 per cent of all births. Such estimates are an urban myth. The actual evidence suggests that the true extent of misattributed paternity is closer to one per cent, and not more than three per cent. Copyright. Monash University and the author/s See here
/r/MensRights16/08/22 08:19 AM
2

Be careful, some of them charge as much as 70,000 karma points per hour.
/r/MensRights16/08/22 06:19 AM
10

Evidence? Or just something you made up on the spot?
/r/MensRights15/08/22 10:50 AM
3

It should be an "n" instead of an "l", right?
/r/MensRights15/08/22 09:43 AM
3

Intelligent discourse goes over OP's head.
/r/MensRights15/08/22 08:20 AM
2

I ask myself the same question. What the hell is wrong with these hate-spewing, bitter, twisted, illogical ideologues?
/r/MensRights15/08/22 08:19 AM
2

In the millennials' sense of the word or the traditional one?
/r/MensRights15/08/22 08:17 AM
2

"Men can't flee the war in Ukraine" - yet no acknowledgment of the fact that in eastern European countries women are expected to do all the housework and childcare, Yeah, I can see how that's balanced. /S Domestic violence was only criminalized in Ukraine a few years ago I doubt that. I suspect that new measures were introduced a few years ago and that this is used to imply, falsely, that DV was legal before. But you have presented no evidence and no details. the culture is still very much accep…
/r/MensRights15/08/22 08:15 AM
6

Ah, but you didn't mark your post as copyright, so I stole the credits. Good job it's only karma points and not real money.
/r/MensRights14/08/22 07:22 AM
5

I agree. He still has the right to sue her, but he did not behave in a professional manner. He should, as you said, have walked away, de-escalated or called for assistance.
/r/MensRights14/08/22 06:33 AM
6

A lot of these matters can be settled with a little more social skill. e.g. A girl wants in to your ball game, explain "you're welcome on another occasion, but we've already fixed the sides for this game." Or even "You're welcome to play, but it's boys' rules, which means you might end up getting hurt." etc. Other skills you can learn are note taking - exact words, times and dates written down - and filming. So that when the girl says "he hit me" you ask "Did you do anything first?" and then, wh…
/r/MensRights14/08/22 05:58 AM
8

Thanks
/r/MensRights14/08/22 05:14 AM
15

Can you explain why?
/r/MensRights14/08/22 04:51 AM
1

Women, trans people and others have not escaped the laws of biology any more than pilots have escaped the pull of gravity.
/r/MensRights14/08/22 01:31 AM
2

All possible efforts will be made to increase participation of women researchers in the project. What, even after they've been hired?
/r/MensRights14/08/22 12:44 AM
3

Sure, there’s a political element to her arrest There's a political element to the demands for her release, but she got the standard sentence for the offence.
/r/MensRights14/08/22 12:24 AM
86

The therapy they need is learning red pill.
/r/MensRights14/08/22 12:19 AM
23

It seems fairly clear to me. He says: For men, this means a relationship skills gap that, if not addressed, will likely lead to fewer dating opportunities, less patience for poor communication skills, and longer periods of being single. The problem for men is that emotional connection is the lifeblood of healthy, long-term love. Emotional connection requires all the skills that families are still not consistently teaching their young boys. Of course, he is just another academic simp trying to ge…
/r/MensRights14/08/22 12:18 AM
1

Excellent analysis.
/r/MensRights13/08/22 10:21 AM
0

It's projection: women use sex for leverage and feminists project that view of sex onto rapists.
/r/MensRights13/08/22 10:19 AM
1

Nothing. Because I don't watch TV.
/r/MensRights13/08/22 09:36 AM
13

Only a small proportion of children die? That's okay then.
/r/MensRights13/08/22 07:52 AM
2

Let's say I was a shitty human being Okay, you're a shitty human being.
/r/MensRights12/08/22 03:40 PM
4

Shouldn't stop you getting those qualifications now.
/r/MensRights12/08/22 03:36 PM
0

No, women, trans people and others have not escaped the laws of biology any more than pilots have escaped the pull of gravity.
/r/MensRights12/08/22 03:33 PM
21

Yes, if you were born in America, you are, by defintion, a native American. Not indigenous, but native. People running colleges are so ignorant they don't seem to know the difference.
/r/MensRights12/08/22 03:18 AM
4

The Istanbul convention adopted by the EU allows encourages discrimination against men. Fixed it.
/r/MensRights11/08/22 02:30 PM
1

But even then ac is sexist.
/r/MensRights11/08/22 05:04 AM
2

Equality of sentencing, and arrest, decision to charge and conviction. Taken together, it would probably result in similar levels of incarceration.
/r/MensRights11/08/22 04:24 AM
6

And 40% of prisoners.
/r/MensRights11/08/22 03:17 AM
3

So, they put themselves beneath you by admitting "this is how I function." Just accept the fact and don't debate your motivation with them.
/r/MensRights11/08/22 12:41 AM
1

So then your logic is at fault as it is only a waste of time and money if this condition is met, however your statement about prenups being a waste of time and money is general.
/r/MensRights09/08/22 02:35 PM
2

Quite simple: the patriarchy does not exist.
/r/MensRights09/08/22 05:25 AM
1

"Have done" is not the same as "always do" which is what you said above.
/r/MensRights09/08/22 12:05 AM
2

Don't take "legal" advice from random strangers on the net. They are likely to be wrong.
/r/MensRights09/08/22 12:04 AM
1

Feminists ≠ women
/r/MensRights08/08/22 11:34 PM
1

Your argument is falsified by the demonstrable fact of the gender equality paradox : The gender-equality paradox is the finding that various gender differences in personality and occupational choice are larger in more gender equal countries. Larger differences are found in Big Five personality traits, Dark Triad traits, self-esteem, depression, personal values, occupational and educational choices. This phenomenon is seemingly paradoxical because one would expect the differences to be reduced as…
/r/MensRights08/08/22 11:27 PM
3

Was it not men that discouraged women from taking those jobs? No Was it not the traditional viewing of women as soft and incapable of hard work (which is mainly reinforced by men) that pushed many women from taking those jobs? No astly, now that women are going into those careers is it not men that target them for it? No jobs you denied/discouraged them from. Your evidence for this is...? Of course not all men are accountable to the statements I have made above but for the sake of the argument l…
/r/MensRights08/08/22 02:50 PM
1

Please make a main post of it. Be specific; that way we can actually debate what is happening/has happened.
/r/MensRights07/08/22 06:22 AM
1

You shouldn't be repeating, you should be giving actual, factual, real-world verifiable evidence. You are simply throwing words around as if I am meant to say "Ah, yes, the misogyny", "the pay gap (which doesn't exist)" etc. These things may be facts in your mind, but you cannot simply transfer them by referencing a few vague words supposed to relate to un-named places at unspecified times.
/r/MensRights07/08/22 05:47 AM
1

You're not saying anything. Arguments presented without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.
/r/MensRights07/08/22 05:23 AM
1

Er, yes you can cross link to this subreddit. You actually haven't given any examples of the behaviour you cite. It seems to be some set of vague notions in your head that we cannot debate because you will not relate them to any real world event. Simply saying "history", "misogyny" "attitudes" is pretty much meaningless unless you can show evidence.
/r/MensRights07/08/22 05:16 AM
1

No, you have made no specific references to any countries, times or actual issues, just vague comments which you have refused to support with any evidence.
/r/MensRights07/08/22 04:12 AM
1

No, I am asking for evidence of these things, e.g. misogyny, happening and being the norm. So you select honor killings as a way of finding a majority of female victims, which is, in any case, far from certain. The majority of killings including lynchings, assaults and judicial killings are of men by a very long way. Why focus on the only category which may, and it is far from certain, produce a majority of female victims. There is no pay gap. Women earn less by doing less valuable work. It has …
/r/MensRights07/08/22 03:59 AM
1

Because jn history and in many countries men are op pressers, and society was built that it still benefits them today. What are you talking about specifically? Misogyny? Again, what are you talking about. Honor killings? They happen to men as well. Most executions and killings are of men at most times and places in history and by a very large margin. Double standards? Again, what are you talking about? Pay gaps? Women earn less and are supported by men. This is now, and has always been the case.…
/r/MensRights07/08/22 03:17 AM
1

when did I state I hated all men? You implied that men are oppressors by saying "how could the oppressor (presumably men) be oppressed?" I’ve seen people just plain out try to veil their misogyny. What are they saying exactly? Women have always been privileged by nature of the inbuilt instinct in the species to protect females. There has never been any need for a movement to leverage that to gain further privileges. What oppression were you talking about?
/r/MensRights07/08/22 02:50 AM
4

They did the same thing during the era of McCarthy.
/r/MensRights07/08/22 02:08 AM
19

Unfortunately, unlike real businesses, these institutions are unlikely to go broke. It is the taxpayer who will foot the bill for this stupidity.
/r/MensRights07/08/22 01:45 AM
2

feminism is not the hatred of men In practice, it is exactly that, and has been from the start. Read the Declaration of Sentiments from the Seneca Falls Convention to see that. And how could the oppressor be oppressed You seem to be assuming men are oppressors, thus grouping yourself with "those people who use (feminism) as an excuse (for hating men.)" most of this sub all I’ve seen are people just shitting on women and using it for their own misogyny You are either reading more into it than you…
/r/MensRights07/08/22 01:34 AM
2

think men and women should have equal rights What does that mean?
/r/MensRights06/08/22 11:39 PM
1

No it wasn't.
/r/MensRights06/08/22 11:24 PM
3

That extremist group is the dominant force in the movement. Who are you to say who is a real feminist and who is not? You are just some random on the Internet and not even the person who asked the question. There is a mass of evidence concerning male oppression on this Subreddit, you should read some of it. As for taking into account societal and social power imbalances, that is exactly what we are doing.
/r/MensRights06/08/22 11:23 PM
1

Women are now much less happy than they have ever been before. The attempt at being a "whole woman" by becoming an imitation man is playing havoc with them.
/r/MensRights06/08/22 11:09 PM
6

Just tell them "the wage gap is appalling. Equal pay legislation has existed for fifty years and still women are earning less than men. They really must start to pull their weight."
/r/MensRights06/08/22 11:05 PM
3

Don't do this, it will not end well. The mere fact of you talking to her again may be interpreted as deliberately making her feel uncomfortable. The poster is being extremely naive in suggesting you follow this route.
/r/MensRights06/08/22 10:29 AM
1

Possession and smuggling are different offences. She was convicted of the far more serious offence of smuggling (importation.) Here is what professor of law William E. Butler said about the sentence: "as longtime scholar of Russian law, I can say the sentence announced in the Khimki District Court outside Moscow on Aug. 4, 2022, is more or less in line with what was expected. Moreover, I believe the sentence itself does little to change the equation when it comes to any quid pro quo with Russia …
/r/MensRights06/08/22 01:34 AM
21

Don't do this at work. Don't ask women out. Instead tell them "I'm going to be at (time, place), you can join me if you like." I don't know what I did to make her uncomfortable. You asked a direct question. Some people are uncomfortable saying no, hence the game is a sort of alternation of push and pull.
/r/MensRights06/08/22 12:33 AM
2

It's about "men bad, women good, me glorious political rebel and me and me" if it's like other bell hooks stuff I've read.
/r/MensRights06/08/22 12:26 AM
1

From the American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language: The criminal offense of intentionally and secretively bringing an item into a country without declaring it to customs officials and paying the associated duties or taxes, or of bringing a prohibited item into a country.The offense of carrying, or causing to be carried, across the boundary of a nation or district, goods which are dutiable, without either paying the duties or allowing the goods to be subjected to the revenue laws; or t…
/r/MensRights06/08/22 12:23 AM
6

What is the evidence for her being a political prisoner?
/r/MensRights06/08/22 12:06 AM
3

On what basis do you take the US to be the World's strongest country? It looks very shaky.
/r/MensRights05/08/22 12:01 PM
1

And, of course, their guilt cannot be relied upon if they did not get due process.
/r/MensRights05/08/22 07:50 AM
7

"Women work longer and harder than men". If you believe that, you can believe in the teddy bear's picnic.
/r/MensRights05/08/22 07:45 AM
22

What is it about stiff sentencing for smuggling illegal drugs even in small quantities that some people don't seem to grasp?
/r/MensRights05/08/22 07:28 AM
-4

You insulted me. Am I to blame for that?
/r/MensRights04/08/22 09:27 PM
-25

Sometimes victims really are partly to blame.
/r/MensRights04/08/22 11:52 AM
24

It was a joke. Reality has become so bizarre though, it may not have been obvious.
/r/MensRights04/08/22 10:38 AM
2

Now that could be a movie. Cat woman V. Batgirl. Life's a riot with woke Vs woke.
/r/MensRights04/08/22 08:50 AM
7

As I said I thought it was the replacement of an original male character with a female replacement for no reason other than "girl power" in the style of the female ghostbusters. Edit: a little research suggests I might have been right. From the Daily Mail: Batgirl's screenplay was by Christina Hodson, the British writer of ultra-feminist film Birds Of Prey, accused by one critic of 'hating on men — all men . . . [and] dull to the point of numbing'. Batgirl also featured a transgender character, …
/r/MensRights04/08/22 07:10 AM
3

Take your time on that one.
/r/MensRights04/08/22 07:04 AM
2

I didn't realise that, I thought it was another attempt at usurping traditional or original male characters.
/r/MensRights04/08/22 07:03 AM
5

Because in most higher species including humans males perform and females select. There is clearly an agenda to undermine male achievement both in real world and fiction.
/r/MensRights04/08/22 06:55 AM
5

No, but Batman is a male character as is Father Christmas. Having more female characters than the public wishes to see, as shown by the series of flops in such movies, is pushing an agenda.
/r/MensRights04/08/22 06:45 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter