TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Dworgi Archive

View 0 posts and 112 comments by Dworgi on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-4

That's it, I give up. This sub is officially a misogynistic cesspool that has nothing to do with its original goals. Fuck you guys.
/r/MensRights29/12/19 12:20 PM
2

Do you think background checks should be required for all firearms purchases? Do you think people with a history of violent crimes or mental illness should be allowed to own guns? Do you think all police officers should be armed?
/r/MensRights28/12/19 02:03 PM
-2

You're right on one thing - firearms are disgusting. Progress doesn't really stop because you want it to either. Hell, the last time it really did we called it the Dark Ages. It's weird how many people here want a repeat.
/r/MensRights28/12/19 02:00 PM
2

Except that there actually is blood on the streets, which you're ignoring.
/r/MensRights28/12/19 01:58 PM
2

Except the modern far left, which is what we're talking about, hasn't killed anyone domestically whereas the far right actually has. White supremacists commit the vast majority of mass shootings.
/r/MensRights28/12/19 01:35 PM
1

Germany isn't on the brink of collapse, what are you even on about? You should stop reading propaganda, my man.
/r/MensRights28/12/19 01:33 PM
-12

Yes, personal firearms are a relic of the past, and have no place in civilized society. I don't think it's really a discussion worth having since it's so obvious which side cares about human life and which one just needs penis extensions.
/r/MensRights28/12/19 01:32 PM
1

Because she was Secretary of State? Is that your argument? How about the military, the police, the KKK, Charlottesville, and just about every domestic terrorist in the past decade? They're all overwhelmingly right wing.
/r/MensRights28/12/19 01:28 PM
-18

Far left ideas like taxation, common sense gun control, working to mitigate the effects of climate change, and not discriminating against black people. You're a joke. A brainwashed joke. History will mention your kind only in relation to the most disastrous presidency of the country's history, and the reactionary masses who voted him in.
/r/MensRights28/12/19 12:59 PM
-3

And after writing this post, I bet you'll still wonder why anyone would think this sub is overrun by the far right. That's some mighty fine projection. Flip left with right and you've got exactly the rhetoric of the right - only the right actually goes ahead and murders those who disagree.
/r/MensRights28/12/19 12:42 PM
-6

That's because social democracy is a well-defined political ideology that is currently in use by most of the developed world - UK, Canada, Australia, France, Germany, etc. Hell, it's even in line with what the US was in the 50's and 60's under the New Deal. You guys are really, really ignorant.
/r/MensRights28/12/19 12:38 PM
2

How about you ask the entire EU, since that's literally the level of leftist Bernie is. He'd be a moderate there, and Americans conflate him with Venezuela. I'm curious, have you ever had an original thought, or has it all just been regurgitated Fox News talking points?
/r/MensRights28/12/19 12:34 PM
-15

Centrism in this political climate and this Overton window is just right wing. Have the balls to say it if you think it.
/r/MensRights28/12/19 12:31 PM
-6

To be fair, a lot of people here are also MAGA morons. Wish it wasn't true, but it is.
/r/MensRights28/12/19 12:29 PM
-12

Seriously. This place has gone to shit now that the bigots have become emboldened by Trumpism. Fucking Russia Today getting posted...
/r/MensRights12/09/19 07:35 AM
-7

If the shoe fits.
/r/MensRights19/05/19 04:38 PM
-7

Being a Nazi makes your opinions invalid.
/r/MensRights19/05/19 04:12 PM
-6

I was here before you. Fuck you.
/r/MensRights19/05/19 03:46 PM
3

Then don't reply, that's fine.
/r/MensRights03/05/19 05:36 PM
4

Because Nazis are bad? Note, he didn't not reply to the tweet, he just refused to write those words.
/r/MensRights03/05/19 11:07 AM
0

He also wouldn't tweet that Nazis are bad.
/r/MensRights03/05/19 07:42 AM
-3

Oh fuck right off. Jesus Christ guys. Notch is a Nazi, and this sub is defending him. For shame.
/r/MensRights03/05/19 07:41 AM
0

Agreed. I've been subbed for a long time, and it's definitely become much more frequent to see people using this sub to spread alt right bullshit.
/r/MensRights22/03/19 11:16 PM
2

I agree with the principle of innocent until proven guilty, I just don't think this is a fight worth taking. I don't think we should believe women without question, but in this case it seems clear that something happened with Ford (and the GOP knew about it), or the entire GOP wouldn't be shitting the bed during the hearing the way they did. Looking around this comment section, though, there is definitely more than a whiff of Trumpism, and far less concern about putting this guy on the SC.
/r/MensRights03/10/18 05:56 AM
-6

Should he come out unscathed though? He's clearly a liar, regardless of the validity of the accusations. Should perjurers be allowed to be a federal judge? If anything, justice is overdue. It just seems a really stupid hill to die on, and makes this sub seem like the Trumpian shitfest others accuse it of being.
/r/MensRights02/10/18 10:49 PM
-9

Jesus Christ, is this what this sub has become? Fucking Kavanaugh apologists? Fuck that.
/r/MensRights02/10/18 10:32 PM
1

I would argue that most good things that humanity has accomplished are diametrically opposed to our instincts. It's a pretty good measure for whether something is a good thing or not. I don't think communism is the answer, because it doesn't work. However, I think libertarianism is disastrous and hilariously misguided. The belief that the same corporations that pollute and exploit the world would ever be benevolent is fucking childish. Libertarianism is a safety blanket for people without a shre…
/r/MensRights24/11/17 08:50 AM
1

But you didn't read the philosophy, did you? There is such a thing as a good principle executed badly, you know. Side note: what's your opinion on sick people dying? Best in the West at that, aren't you?
/r/MensRights23/11/17 10:58 PM
0

United Nations Development Programme work for you? US is 10th.
/r/MensRights23/11/17 04:08 PM
1

Yeah, how much conflicting information did you seek out in your quest for facts? Read much Marx, for example, or do you regard him as evil? Only paying attention to one side is brainwashing.
/r/MensRights23/11/17 04:06 PM
3

only the government can be a morally good entity I didn't claim this - you built this strawman. However, charity is fleeting and fickle. Causes that gain the public attention receive many times what they need, and causes that are just as important get nothing. Your attention span is finite. Cast your mind's eye back long, long ago to Puerto Rico's crisis. How long ago was that? Ages, right? They're probably fine by now. But they're not fine. Our attention just shifted elsewhere. Charity and join…
/r/MensRights23/11/17 12:01 AM
-15

America is the greatest nation on Earth By what metric? You're so fucking brainwashed that the Soviet Union looks like the fucking Tooth Fairy compared to what the US has done to your mind.
/r/MensRights22/11/17 11:57 PM
-2

the gist is that what we are doing isn't working I'd strongly argue that this is because you're not doing enough, not because you're doing too much (because you really aren't, people are dying in the streets). I cannot emphasize this enough - I believe that no nation that calls themselves civilized can allow human beings to die due to lack of basic necessities. As for being a productive member of society - this is very quickly going to be a moot point, since a huge amount of jobs are going to di…
/r/MensRights22/11/17 11:52 PM
0

Which is unfortunate, because I really think the issues transcend political alignment.
/r/MensRights22/11/17 08:13 PM
-13

Mighty eloquent for someone who thinks people should just die in the streets.
/r/MensRights22/11/17 08:12 PM
-36

The only reason America is the only country in which libertarianism exists is because America hasn't truly suffered. The World Wars set Europe on the path toward social democracy, because it busted apart the myth of the sovereignty of the individual. No individual could have done shit when a hostile power threatened their entire way of life. It was only the collective that could influence the course of history. This romanticism towards the individual is fucking stupid. The Wild West was a libert…
/r/MensRights22/11/17 08:10 PM
-19

Statism is a crap phrase used exclusively by libertarians that are fundamentally divorced from reality and devoid of empathy.
/r/MensRights22/11/17 07:51 PM
-32

Oh fuck off with this "statism" bullshit. That's not at all related to the overreaches of feminism.
/r/MensRights22/11/17 07:24 PM
20

Sure, but people learn differently. Maybe this guy doesn't have female family members or friends willing to teach him. Maybe he needs hands on experience instead of just a YouTube video.
/r/MensRights07/10/17 01:45 PM
13

I had a friend who hit me hard in the stomach as a joke. This obviously shocked me, so I told her she would never hit me again. The look of awkward disbelief that was apparent on her face leads me to believe no one had ever actually told her not to do it. She never did hit me again.
/r/MensRights21/08/17 06:35 AM
1

At the moment yes. But, don't forget that this is a new technology and as you said yourself, this characteristic comes from the social-economic situation and it might not be representative of the real world. What? That's absolute nonsense. The global, lifetime supply of Bitcoin is finite. That means it's always going to be deflationary. Again, calling it an investment is extremely telling, because it shows that you don't regard it as money that can be spent to buy goods, but rather as a way to m…
/r/MensRights11/08/17 09:59 AM
1

the only major difference between $ and XBT is the fact that the other currencies are backed up by the countries that issued I'm not asking for the talking points, I'm asking for an analysis of what happens when a currency deflates. Do you think a deflationary currency like Bitcoin can ever have as much circulation as any real currency? The best way to make money with Bitcoin is to not spend it. The best way to make money with real money is to spend it and make more of it, because just sitting o…
/r/MensRights11/08/17 07:43 AM
1

As a currency, not an investment. It fails the test for a currency, because no one actively uses it since it keeps rising in value. Even you call it an investment, but the name implies currency. It's clearly not that.
/r/MensRights11/08/17 06:50 AM
0

100% agreed. There's a reason every fiat currency in the world maintains moderate inflation instead of massive deflation like Bitcoin. But hey, ignore all the economists.
/r/MensRights10/08/17 10:26 PM
2

Why the hell is it important for millionaires to make more millions? This is so far beyond what actually matters. Show me a gap near the poverty line and I'll be more interested in trying to fix it.
/r/MensRights21/06/17 05:54 AM
12

Egalitarian. Feminism is a hate group, better to forget the word and use one that actually reflects what you want.
/r/MensRights10/03/17 08:35 AM
22

It's still censorship by Twitter, and no law prevents them from doing it. But it's still censoring.
/r/MensRights05/02/17 12:32 PM
1

Most countries don't believe in destroying lives, which is why we don't have sex offender registries. Honestly, it's one of the things I dislike the most about the US - everyone seems to believe that hurting more people is how you solve crime, which is absurd because crime's only a problem because it hurts people. I don't think that one is going to get fixed anytime soon though...
/r/MensRights20/08/16 05:18 AM
-4

No worries, buddy, you deserve it.
/r/MensRights24/06/16 11:00 AM
-3

You're not being very convincingly part of the non-stupid camp. Please don't have children.
/r/MensRights24/06/16 10:30 AM
0

Probably higher now, it seems to be everywhere.
/r/MensRights27/05/16 09:05 AM
2

Alas, it won't be us deciding, just as it isn't second wave feminists deciding today. Old-school radfems regularly pop up here lamenting the march towards permanent victimhood and oversensitivity, which wasn't their goal at all.
/r/MensRights24/05/16 03:11 PM
5

Christ, 40 years ago feminists were the most staunch defenders of free speech, because it was them being silenced.
/r/MensRights24/05/16 02:29 PM
6

Obviously. Try to suggest that women's studies degrees are sexist and thus offensive. Despite the objective truth of this, you'd get shouted down immediately.
/r/MensRights24/05/16 02:27 PM
1

The average person who's heard of MRAs already thinks they're one of those 2 things.
/r/MensRights22/05/16 07:28 AM
3

It's not a bad statistic (it's perfectly valid and true), it just doesn't mean what people think it does.
/r/MensRights08/05/16 04:53 PM
13

It's not even where you're going that's the problem, the problem is not checking where you are. Full equality is an admirable goal, minimal sexual assault is also. The problem is that universities are already one of the safest places in terms of sexual assault, and women make up 55% of college graduates. Universities overshot their goal, and people have only recently started realising that it happened.
/r/MensRights24/03/16 05:14 PM
1

someone else could perceive a situation differently from the way you do? I don't believe in evo psych. I haven't once mentioned evo psych, yet you've twice now accused me of being a believer in it. This situation isn't about the woman's perspective - it's exclusively about the other person's perspective. If the message didn't go through, then it's not the recipient's problem. They don't even know the message exists. the mental limit of your ability to conceive of this dynamic from more than one …
/r/MensRights22/03/16 03:30 PM
1

from her perspective and in her own mind she has absolutely This is what I mean by "feelings don't matter a jot". It doesn't matter what you think when you're trying to affect someone else. Factually, the other person is not aware. It's irrelevant what you think has happened, because you have failed at accomplishing your goal. at least as much his fault as it is hers What? Are you honestly arguing that it's the responsibility of men to make sure that they understand when women are trying to hit …
/r/MensRights22/03/16 02:41 PM
1

A complaint I hear from women friends is that they are frustrated that men seem to be completely oblivious to the signals they feel they are sending out You haven't accomplished, or risked, anything if you haven't made the other party aware of your intentions. It's like applying for a job - if the company doesn't know you were interested, then you cannot blame the company for not hiring you. Sure, that may mean that you have to jump through hoops and fill in web forms and do a bunch of stuff you…
/r/MensRights22/03/16 11:41 AM
1

What I presume you are trying to say is that observable behaviours have deep biological roots driving them No, that's not at all what I'm saying. I'm saying that it doesn't matter if women feel like they're getting rejected if they're not doing anything. Yes, I'll count them as rejected if they're "pumped and dumped", though it's a phrase I detest personally, because it ascribes agency to only one party. The woman is the subject in both those verbs, not an active participant. However, in this ca…
/r/MensRights22/03/16 08:57 AM
1

Feelings matter not a jot in the face of facts.
/r/MensRights22/03/16 07:32 AM
2

I wouldn't say it's due to the huge imbalance in sex drive. I'd say it's more down to just numbers. If 10% of people are attracted to you, you need to try 10 times on average to get a match. Scale that up to get people who are really attracted to you and could be long-term partners. High sex drive is the motivation to do so, not the reason for the disparity.
/r/MensRights22/03/16 07:29 AM
1

More in agreement with you now. I find this to be much worse than you make it out to be, because it's both a larger ask and more intimate. It's not doing the dishes, it's irreversible surgery.
/r/MensRights12/02/16 08:20 AM
2

She threatens suicide if she ever gets pregnant again.
/r/MensRights12/02/16 07:46 AM
2

Going on a sex strike, publicly posting about it? That's coercion.
/r/MensRights11/02/16 11:45 PM
5

I don't think her decision is fair because it's not her decision to make. Bodily autonomy was one of the core issues of women's liberation, yet apparently it's not on the table for men?
/r/MensRights11/02/16 10:21 PM
5

Then she should have her tubes tied. She's established she never wants kids again, and she has an equivalent option. Why should it be on the husband?
/r/MensRights11/02/16 06:12 PM
1

I think you'd get a lot more suicidal rescue missions. I doubt the effect would be beneficial overall.
/r/MensRights11/01/16 11:55 PM
2

Society couldn't deal with female hostages. Everyone would lose their shit if even one woman was brutally mutilated. Soldiers would lose their shit. That can't be fixed, not for a long time if ever.
/r/MensRights11/01/16 06:37 PM
8

Humanities academics can. Sociology, gender studies - neither produces falsifiable theories. That's not science, that's just speculation and conjecture. That's what people mean by academia. Science is exempt, because it's testable.
/r/MensRights11/01/16 06:35 PM
8

I find it unfortunate to be honest. I consider myself a social democrat, yet the insanity in the left is pushing the center rightwards even in Scandinavia, a liberal stronghold. I don't want people to abandon my political ideals because progressives are ruining the left.
/r/MensRights05/01/16 12:05 AM
2

I agree, but your claim that women are subservient because they're weaker mentally and physically. That sounds a lot like patriarchy to me.
/r/MensRights26/12/15 10:20 PM
2

Because you're hating women. It's counter-productive since we want equality, not a return to patriarchy.
/r/MensRights26/12/15 09:57 AM
2

In reality, it's more like: "you arrive at a door, turn to any or all of pages 1-500".
/r/MensRights16/12/15 12:04 PM
18

Feminist doesn't mean what you think it means. If you want equality, the first step is to distance yourself from that label.
/r/MensRights04/12/15 07:50 AM
6

It is not a right to not be offended. Being offended is a personal choice that has no bearing on what other people can or cannot do. Free speech is a right.
/r/MensRights08/11/15 11:50 AM
8

So what? So lots of things. Freedom of speech is a core tenet of democracy, and one that universities were built upon. Intellectual honesty is a founding principle of academia, and it is allergic to censorship. If it were only acceptable to express views that society regards as moral and just, then society would not be nearly advanced enough to care about the plight of the miniscule fraction of the population that is trans men. Nevermind that an opposing opinion is not enough to constitute a cre…
/r/MensRights08/11/15 09:13 AM
1

Still seems pretty mislead about a lot of things, unfortunately.
/r/MensRights02/10/15 04:24 PM
2

My girlfriend is like that. Only she's 5 foot nothing. She'd try like hell to do anything, but the fact is that there are certain boxes she will never be able to lift. I did civil service and the packs weighed 20 kilos, plus rifle and ammo. She wouldn't be physically capable of carrying that amount of weight for the distances we were required to march. This wasn't special forces, either, this was just basic grunt training.
/r/MensRights01/10/15 10:58 AM
4

And military males are already above average in terms of strength.
/r/MensRights01/10/15 09:34 AM
1

Hmm, really? Coursework was definitely included in my degree. It counted for 60% of my overall grade IIRC.
/r/MensRights23/09/15 07:44 PM
13

What's unequal about exams? Same test with very little limitation on how you choose to learn, unlike in elementary schools. If you were arguing for more varied teaching methods I'd be on board, because whatever, but you're arguing about the method of evaluation. Given that the method is known, isn't it each person's responsibility to do their best towards it? And people are measured by their success at doing so. I don't think you can blame the method if one group consistently underperforms towar…
/r/MensRights23/09/15 04:29 PM
2

Shouldn't apply to defaults. It's not their sub anymore, it's reddit.
/r/MensRights12/06/15 09:26 AM
1

Mods are a blunt tool not suitable for subreddits above a certain size. There's no accountability, no way for users to get rid of them. Look what happened to the WoW sub when a mod had a hissy fit a while back. It's too much power to give to a few people. All the defaults should have either an employee of reddit as mod or true accountability. Defaults are the public face of reddit, and it's insane to treat them the same as your 5 man CS clan's private sub.
/r/MensRights12/06/15 09:26 AM
1

I've been there nearly 4 years...
/r/MensRights11/06/15 10:49 PM
2

Shit, I'm a dev with 5 years experience. I had my personal review on Tuesday and my boss was praising me for everything I do, yet I kept thinking "there's a but coming". There wasn't, but I still feel like I'm not as smart as others even while explaining things to them. Impostor syndrome is tough, and it affects most people in intellectual fields where you can't really measure yourself against others directly.
/r/MensRights11/06/15 08:38 PM
9

They have also entirely stopped recording ethnic backgrounds of criminals since 2005. Turns out people react badly to knowing that the country lets people who commit rape stay in the country. Better to just pretend everyone's homogenous.
/r/MensRights22/05/15 12:30 AM
2

And I'll be up in arms with you as soon as anything more happens.
/r/MensRights08/05/15 06:49 AM
2

They have 1 out of 6. Not sure why it's female only, but there you go.
/r/MensRights07/05/15 08:37 PM
21

It's more a convenience thing for us. It doesn't really make sense to have male and female bathrooms when it's 95/5 male/female at the company: one bathroom would just go largely unused. So there's one purely female bathroom (for some reason) and the rest are whatever. Sometimes there are circumstances that explain the situation, but I agree with the principle you're explaining and have done for ages.
/r/MensRights07/05/15 06:05 PM
25

No, EU. I don't particularly care, though. It's just a minor thing.
/r/MensRights07/05/15 03:00 PM
121

Shit, this is the case at my workplace.
/r/MensRights07/05/15 01:44 PM
3

Absolutely. It's always a one way street. It's basically just the feminist legacy in a nutshell, though.
/r/MensRights20/03/15 08:43 PM
3

I cook more than my girlfriend. She complains I don't clean, even though she only cleans weekly if that. Purely hourly, I think cooking is more time consuming, and affects my quality of living far more. I think it's similar. Equality in all things except the ones you don't want to do. And to clarify, I'm not breaking up with my girlfriend. She does lots of things that I appreciate a lot.
/r/MensRights20/03/15 06:25 PM
9

Look, it's much simpler than that. Teachers and nurses don't just attract lots of women, they attract lots of people - the majority of whom are women. No one's saying nurses aren't valuable, but there's just a long line of people who would do the job for less money than you're offering. That's supply and demand. Garbage collectors earn great money, because no one wants the job unless you pay them more. Shit, you want women to earn more? Teach them 3 hours of economics and show them the statistic…
/r/MensRights18/02/15 08:17 AM
46

I love the mental gymnastics they have to perform. Men think celebrities are attractive, therefore when they look at naked pictures of them, they actually hate those people and their entire gender. Makes sense?
/r/MensRights07/09/14 03:15 PM
1

I noticed that trend at uni myself. The dozen or so women in my course all aimed to get into business/management type fields.
/r/MensRights26/08/14 10:43 AM
1

It's an entirely different axis of authoritarianism. Left/right are economic separations, liberal/conservative are social separations. Hitler and Stalin are much closer to each other than either is to democrats or republicans.
/r/MensRights17/04/14 06:26 AM
4

At Google/Yahoo? No, flexibility doesn't really cost much as long as the hours are still done.
/r/MensRights06/04/14 01:04 AM
33

No they don't. Introducing flexibility helps single mothers and everyone else. But it still helps single mothers.
/r/MensRights05/04/14 07:04 PM
13

I know a lot of people who would be happy to just be one of the guys, but a lot who would be upset too. I'd say roughly in relation to attractiveness.
/r/MensRights24/02/14 07:38 AM
1

That's what feminism was, that's not what feminism is. The current iteration is toxic to all and the label should be abandoned.
/r/MensRights09/01/14 09:29 PM
0

BRD?
/r/MensRights20/12/13 08:45 PM
19

Hilarious and telling.
/r/MensRights19/12/13 01:43 PM
12

Honestly, it's spreading. AskReddit and CMV are flooded with feminist vote brigades. Someone saying something inane like "society thinks femininity is bad and masculinity is good" gets 500 upvotes and anyone replying with "hold up, it's not that simple" gets 50 downvotes. It won't be long before we need a RedditInAction sub.
/r/MensRights19/12/13 01:40 PM
88

With bodies like Adonis who make their inner goddesses shout 'Woo!'. Paraphrased from the book, but accurate.
/r/MensRights04/08/13 08:54 AM
5

Omerta!
/r/MensRights21/07/13 11:01 PM
5

Comic Con especially is rife with people who don't care about the event, but are there because of movies and to be the first to see movie trailers and the like. The "comics" part of the event doesn't interest them, and that's where a lot of the pushback is coming from. In becoming more mainstream, the essence of the event has been lost. Knowledge is, in my opinion, essential to being a geek. You don't have to know about every field - that's not very geeky, after all - but you probably should hav…
/r/MensRights24/04/13 11:55 AM
3

Nerds are human. Of course there are things they get obsessive about. In fact, that's the definition of a nerd. So then you have cons, created to bring comic fans together. But now, it's not just fans, it's also people who have never read a comic (because they're for nerds) coming to their event because they once saw a Spiderman movie. They don't belong, because they're not interested in the content of the event. It's not about how you dress, it's about your passion and knowledge, and these jock…
/r/MensRights24/04/13 06:37 AM
3

Male rape is a punchline in tons of movies and feminists deny male rape constantly. It infuriates me.
/r/MensRights08/04/13 06:22 AM
1

I've always (unpopularily) thought that ridicule was the most powerful agent for change in existence. If everybody else just decided that believing certain things was funny as fuck (homophobia, for example), people would abandon those beliefs pretty quick.
/r/MensRights30/03/13 10:23 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter