TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

EffectiveWriting986 Archive

View 3 posts and 32 comments by EffectiveWriting986 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Exactly. That's the issue. We got two options: 1. Try and argue back via emotions (but that will put is on their playing field...which they're ultimately better at (the people that agree with the man vs bear)) 2. Completely disengage with them. I think the second option is the best.
/r/MensRights06/06/24 04:23 PM
2

Yeah the question is flawed. It already puts heavy emphasis on the male being a threat.
/r/MensRights06/06/24 12:51 PM
3

You're right. And there were certain words in the question to purposely emphasize the man being "unsafe". Such as "strange man" "at night", and then only having to answer yes or no to such a question too.
/r/MensRights06/06/24 12:49 PM
3

The problem with the Bear vs Man trend is saying, all men are worse than predatory animals. The misandry in similar reels and comments are the problem. This is precisely what's happening. The whole man vs bear trend is super illogical. It's a very emotionally charged argument.
/r/MensRights06/06/24 12:47 PM
1

Yeah that makes sense.
/r/MensRights06/06/24 12:46 PM
1

You're very right. The question which was asked: "should a woman feel safe alone with a strange man in the middle of the woods? Would you feel safe if your mother or wife or child was alone at night with a random man with no one else around?" It had very little context, and as you said, you could easily flip the question to put the man in a better light.
/r/MensRights06/06/24 12:45 PM
1

Can you link a video/source? That sounds interesting. I didn't know about this before.
/r/MensRights06/06/24 02:14 AM
2

Men are doing well at making spaces for themselves and lifting eachother than ever before and that's important to remember. Is this really true though? Because male only spaces are met with hostility from feminists, and the mainstream media. In turn, they often get taken down. And although the rightwing/Jordan Peterson/ Andy type people exist and are followed from experience I've met very few men irl who respect him, sometimes things just seem bigger online because remember those followers are f…
/r/MensRights06/06/24 02:13 AM
2

makes me sad because they’re creating more misogynists by doing this. I used to be a male feminist but I’ve sadly lost most my empathy for those issue’s because of the way I was treated. That's completely understandable. Why would person A. have empathy for person B's issues, when person B. has little to no empathy for theirs? Especially when they say they do. Heck, I almost became misogynistic myself because of the amount of man-hating that I saw online - many of which were by women. But each t…
/r/MensRights06/06/24 01:48 AM
2

Trying to counter the whole man vs bear rhetoric with logical information is futile. Why? Because it's a very emotionally-driven arguement.
/r/MensRights06/06/24 01:35 AM
3

Exactly this. Doing this does nothing at all except cause more divide. I could be wrong, but I think most people agree that being cautious around a stranger is understandable, but then going on a whole mainstream man-hating campaign to say "this is why I chose the bear!" "I hate men!" "Atleast the bear won't rape me", and then they wonder why there are many men that are offended because of this? They were speaking in broad generalizations, and grouping the overwhelming amount of men who would no…
/r/MensRights06/06/24 01:28 AM
2

This is true. I think people will only look at one situation and determine what the future of that may look like (I.e. your baby sitter, known to you, steals your kid) while completely ignoring all the other ones which could potentially happen - which may be both good or bad.
/r/MensRights06/06/24 01:17 AM
3

I agree. The context matters as well.
/r/MensRights06/06/24 01:13 AM
2

Yes you're right. Theres so much contradictory going on that it's simply confusing. Plus, what about the women that didn't choose the bear? What does that say about them? It exposes so much holes in the rhetoric.
/r/MensRights06/06/24 12:42 AM
2

I agree. The way the question is worded is what annoys me, because it's not really about the original question anymore. But according to the person that asked the question: "should a woman feel safe alone with a strange man in the middle of the woods? Would you feel safe if your mother or wife or child was alone at night with a random man with no one else around?" Asked that to convey what the women - who choose the bear in the original question - are trying to say. I'm honestly tired of the tha…
/r/MensRights06/06/24 12:40 AM
1

It would be normal for a man or a woman to have feelings of caution and feeling unsafe around another random man in the woods. You're right. But doesnt that in turn validate the whole man vs bear rhetoric? (Like what was being discussed in the original thread). Honestly I do wanna move past this stupid trend though.
/r/MensRights06/06/24 12:34 AM
3

I agree. The issue is that people are blaming men as a whole for having to take "risks" like I.e. simply going into the woods. This whole thing is very strange.
/r/MensRights06/06/24 12:32 AM
1

Explain why?
/r/MensRights06/06/24 12:21 AM
1

This is a pretty old thread but anyways, I disagree, yes and no. connection is the prize but women are special because they can birth new humans. women play a much larger part, biologically, in the process of procreation. It’s fair that women are the pursued sex for that reason. No matter how much people try and minimize the mans role in reproduction, it still plays a crucial part of reproducing. The woman needs the mans sperm in order to go through the process of reproduction and eventually giv…
/r/ExRedPill25/04/24 11:51 PM
5

This is the same belief that motivated female slaveowners in the American south: they thought owning slaves would liberate them from economic dependence on men. It should also be noted that nearly 40 percent of American slaveowners were women. Yes I remember learning about this. White women who owned slaves were seen as more marriageable as well. It seems to have been the attraction at the time. Also, i dont think that statistic counts the wives who, despite not owning the slaves, were overseers…
/r/MensRights08/04/24 03:32 PM
9

This is the same belief that motivated female slaveowners in the American south: they thought owning slaves would liberate them from economic dependence on men. It should also be noted that nearly 40 percent of American slaveowners were women. Yes I remember learning about this. White women who owned slaves were seen as more marriageable as well. It seems to have been the attraction at the time. Also, i dont think that statistic counts the wives who, despite not owning the slaves, were overseers…
/r/MensRights08/04/24 03:26 PM
1

Interesting. Thanks for the info. Can you link sources for these? I'm curious to learn more about them.
/r/MensRights07/04/24 09:43 PM
1

not to mention the number of mothers doing 'mommy' porn, we will see this get A LOT worse... Wait what??!? Please provide more context on this. I haven't heard of this happening until now.
/r/MensRights07/04/24 06:36 PM
10

Honestly.... When men uplift other men, brotherhood is formed.
/r/MensRights06/04/24 10:32 PM
7

Thanks for the info. A read a story about a Canadian man who was abused by his wife (I think his children were also abused by his wife). He advocated for shelters for men and their their children escaping somestic violence. He raised some money but later lost enough funding. He sadly committed suicide after being ridiculed for years for his advocacy to help men who are victims of domestic violence. Earl Silverman his name was. Rest in peace to him. Check out the Canadian Centre for Men and Famil…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/04/24 10:20 PM
97

"Feminism strives for equality" yet here they are, contradicting themselves again: disrupting a Mensrights conference. Don't you think that if they were striving to achieve equality, they'd be positively participating in the conference?
/r/MensRights06/04/24 10:16 PM
3

How so? I'm curious to hear.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/04/24 10:04 PM
1

Mannn get your freaky ass off the internet 😂
/r/MensRights08/03/24 09:58 PM
16

"I can't believe you sat there and didn't intervene or call the cops to help the woman", ...no way she actually said that. How does someone come to that conclusion?? The ex-wife basically forced herself into his home, aggressively (isn't that a crime?), she started attacking him (another crime). Then that woman comes to the conclusion that the ex-wife needs to be helped in that? For what? It's so amusing..honestly😂 Also, even if you called the police, depending on where you live (like in the USA…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/03/24 02:07 AM
1

You're right. The first female U.S Senator who was a prominent feminist supported the act of lynching.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/03/24 10:21 PM
1

Where men are victim-survivors, they are less likely to experience a pattern of abuse, it is more likely to be a one-off incident. Some men and boys report that when they have been a victim-survivor of abuse it does not have the same impact and cause the same sense of fear. A large proportion of male victim-survivors have been in same sex relationships so that the perpetrator is male (adding to the gendered nature of VAWG). When women are the perpetrator there is substantial evidence to support …
/r/MensRights29/02/24 06:10 PM
1

Women's organisations downplaying male victims of abuse in order to secure funding for themselves. Women's Aid petitioning against funding of shelters for men and claiming female abusers were previously abused by their male victims. Mary Koss manipulating the definition of rape to get her desired statistics. Wow that's crazy. I really wanna look more into these. Where did you learn this?
/r/MensRights27/02/24 10:01 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter