TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Eulabeia Archive

View 10 posts and 1,399 comments by Eulabeia on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 1,399 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

If I wanted kids of my own, I'd look into surrogacy. From some quick research I see that Arkansas would seem to actually recognize only the man as the legal parent in that kind of arrangement. I don't want kids though so I'm not motivated to look into it further to see how well any state would actually enforce such a contract.
/r/TheRedPill05/03/18 02:23 AM
1

It does apply to all programs in federally funded institutions.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/04/17 03:54 AM
1

Sure, that by itself doesn't. Keep reading about what colleges are required to do to be in compliance though and you might see where some take issue with it.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/04/17 03:22 AM
1

Title IX was made to address the gender gap in education. Women used to be behind, and that by itself was considered enough evidence of discrimination, which justified all the affirmative action that led to what you see today.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/04/17 02:54 AM
1

I think that the custody thing may be the number 1 thing that is universally agreed upon You think wrong. Plenty of female chauvinists still argue that men get custody when they fight for it. They have their own little sources too.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/04/17 02:51 AM
1

he gathered up a group of angry people, told them they were heroes, and that violence against their "enemies" is okay. it's astonishing how you can't see that an elected leader organizing an army to attack the citizens and other leaders of the very same country What the hell are you even talking about? Can you please cite some examples because I seriously have no clue. And what does that have to do with my question of who is the sexist?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/16 04:51 PM
3

The word equality when used by feminists is a form of doublespeak. They know that they things they advocate for are the exact opposite of the meaning of the word in the traditional sense, but they call it that anyway to attempt to fool people.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/16 07:50 AM
2

How do you think getting laid works? Do you think that if you are simply good looking enough or tall enough, women are going to beg you to fuck them as soon as you enter their field of vision? Of course being tall doesn't automatically get you laid. You have to actually talk to women.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/16 07:47 AM
2

Hillary literally advocated for treating women differently in the criminal justice system solely because they're women. What did Trump do? Make some crass comments in what was supposed to be a private conversation? Who is the sexist again?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/16 07:41 AM
1

Of course your family cares. Nobody else gives a shit though.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/16 07:37 AM
10

"Misogynist" is an insult that people use because everyone likes women so much that some people are afraid of even seeming like they hate them a little bit. So that's why it's effective. Nobody actually hates women. If anyone really did, they would just say "so?" when faced with the accusation. It doesn't have to make sense when someone says it, it's just supposed to make you afraid of doing or saying the thing that you did.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/16 07:25 AM
18

So should stores get to ban black people too because they can get too rowdy? Why does the behavior of a few people justify collective punishment of everyone who happens to be born the same way?
/r/MensRights06/11/16 09:11 PM
3

So exactly like I said then. You think he'll start a war simply because he said some inflammatory things. Yawn. Not convincing whatsoever.
/r/MensRights05/11/16 12:04 AM
2

That's interesting. Got links?
/r/MensRights04/11/16 11:58 PM
4

But Trump would throw the world into chaos and potentially lead to world wars and other things ...and other things? Like what, specifically? And what kind of wars do you think Trump will start? Every time I've ever heard someone say something like "[potential candidate] will start WW3!", it just felt like an incredibly childish and completely baseless statement. I'm pretty sure Clinton has much more interest in sending troops to wherever to serve her interests anyway. The only reason people seem…
/r/MensRights04/11/16 11:56 PM
2

Didn't she put on her website for a little bit that she basically didn't want to send women to prison? I tried to find the page again a little while after I first saw it but it was taken down.
/r/MensRights04/11/16 11:49 PM
5

Too low for what? I delete my posts How convenient.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/16 06:48 AM
9

It looks like my husband will DEMAND for me to work full time, provide a 6-figure salary LOL, this is where your troll fell apart. You weren't doing bad up until then. Even if we were to take everything you're saying seriously though... and? Why should we care that your view of men has been ruined? Or are you expecting someone to reassure you that they are worth your time? Are you anticipating white knights to grovel and beg for your forgiveness for the horrible sins of other people who dare say…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/16 04:43 AM
1

You can't trust any news outlet with anything, they report whatever the fuck they want. The subscriber count is one of the most unbiased pieces of data we can get.
/r/MensRights27/09/16 06:30 PM
1

How many fathers paying child support do you actually know? All the ones I know who have paid or are currently paying were totally willing to be with the kid and support him, but the mother just wanted to get everything she could from him after the break up to get back at him. You want to paint this as an issue of simply men being selfish assholes but in my experience it was the women.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/16 06:25 AM
7

This country voted for Obama because they were sick of Bush and thought voting for the other party would fix things. Same thing happened when they voted Bush after Clinton. Popular opinion on Obama doesn't seem too good and even a lot of liberals seem to dislike him now. I can see the same pattern of people being jaded with the current party that's in office and swinging the other way.
/r/MensRights27/09/16 06:15 AM
3

All the cases I know of women going after child support are pretty much because they were being selfish and vindictive. My mom had primary custody of me and my dad wanted to help and have split custody but she just wanted to fuck him over as hard as she could even to the point of spending a lot of time with an organization that was all about going after child support. She wanted to go after every penny she could get from him. My brother had two kids with a girl and was with her for a while, and …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/16 06:09 AM
3

Do you have any idea how desperate men can get? Even a good chunk of average looking ones. Men's standards for sex can be incredibly low. While women usually only have sex with men they are willing to date, men don't do that at all. That's why it's so easy for women to get laid in comparison to men.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/16 05:54 AM
5

I think Hillary has this election pretty much wrapped up. What? I never hear good things about her. From like, anyone. Also look at the subscriber count to r/hillaryclinton compared to r/the_donald. If she wins I'd be pretty sure it's because the election was rigged.
/r/MensRights27/09/16 05:41 AM
1

I don't get this urge to buy women shit. The way I feel, is if I have to do that, she doesn't want me that bad. Plenty of women have liked me without me paying them.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/16 03:46 AM
1

Okay if it worked for you then that's cool. But if a woman doesn't already have men offering to pay for her dates, then no amount of waiting around and demanding that is going to help. So your advice isn't going to be useful to everyone.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/16 03:22 AM
6

That doesn't explain why men should have to pay for a date with you. He might not even want kids. Yes women have more innate value than men but that doesn't make you more valuable than all men period. Men work for their value so they can have a lot more than you. You still have to prove yourself a worthy investment. You're a depreciating asset.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/16 01:24 AM
3

No. Are you going to answer the question?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/16 01:10 AM
4

I am giving up something more valuable to enter into a sexual relationship Like what
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/16 11:34 PM
1

But once it's in the woman's body, it's her choice. He can't force her to get an abortion because bodily autonomy. Just like no one can force you to donate your organs even if they need one to live. I agree. I also think that no one should be made to work against their will. So since it is completely her choice, it should be completely her responsibility, so she's a shitty person if she still expects support from the father. Agreed? Or do you have some other shitty argument about how women can n…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/16 01:52 PM
3

How is that moral in any way, shape, or form? Is having unprotected sex immoral now? Are you some kind of hardcore puritanical christian? Or is what you're saying that any man who has unprotected sex has an obligation to support a child that he has no say in actually bringing into this world. Because obligation without choice, or in other words slavery, is somehow moral to you? What kind of fucking morals do you have?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/16 01:35 PM
1

You completely missed the point of my post. If you really think everyone should just suck it up and take care of any unwanted kids, you should be focusing your attention on people who are in favor of abortion, since they're the ones that are actually getting what they want. You are accomplishing nothing by arguing with those who want similar choices for men.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/16 01:24 PM
1

Still a lot easier than 18 years of raising a kid. So are you going to answer if you think women who aren't morally opposed to abortion are shitty people if they choose to keep a kid against the father's wishes?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/16 01:16 PM
1

Abortions are extremely expensive and hard to get in the U.S. No they're not. Also, she may have moral opposition to it. And if she doesn't? Also what makes having an abortion less "moral" than raising a child in a broken family and enslaving a man for your own selfish desires? Or is it just that whatever is more convenient for her is what she convinces herself is moral?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/16 12:58 PM
4

I think what red pill posters mean when they say "single mothers" is not exactly what you have in mind when you see them talking about them. You're probably envisioning them speaking about literally any woman who has a child and is not currently with the father, while they mean women who are a slightly more specific demographic, and don't care to use precise language because they're not in a courtroom nor do they really care much about persuading others to share their exact opinions. It's like, …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/16 08:43 AM
2

Abortion is wrong Well, it is legal and widely accepted. Men wanting nothing to do with kids they don't want is not. You're arguing with the wrong people here if you really think that, and aren't just saying that as a convenient derailment.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/16 08:26 AM
0

The dad isn't the one that gets to make the choice to keep the kid. A mother who decides to that while knowing the father wants nothing to do with it is a really terrible person IMO, much more so than someone who just chose to have unprotected sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/16 08:21 AM
5

For every person like him who would get shamed by almost anyone for even hinting at discriminating against women, there are at least ten times more people openly discriminating against men with affirmative action and title IX bullshit, and people like you defending them. But go ahead and keep believing that women have it so much worse just because one guy, who we can't even be certain was being completely serious, said he wouldn't hire women, in whatever the fuck field he is in that there are pr…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/16 06:40 AM
2

I have nothing more to say, because there is no point in repeating myself. Not my fault your reading comprehension sucks.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/16 08:38 AM
1

Sure. Is that supposed to contradict anything I said so far?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/16 08:34 AM
2

Maybe try getting back to this topic when you're less angry so you can fully understand what exactly is being said here.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/16 08:30 AM
1

So a nonverbal male never gets that level of support? Not never, but much less likely to. She got that much support partly because of the things she typed and how amazed the people were Seems like her parents still took good care of her even before that.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/16 08:26 AM
2

OP's claim: there are people that think literally every woman in existence have easy lives. Posts video about a girl with mental disorder to "prove" them wrong. SelfishMonk's claim: girls with a few key traits have easy lives, and girls with mental disorders obviously aren't in that category. What the fuck did you think you proved?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/16 08:24 AM
2

She's still suffering more than you I did not mean to imply that she wasn't. Is she likely to be suffering more than a man with the same disorder though? To me, the answer is without a doubt, no. She probably gets more support from others than any man like that. A TV segment on her like the one you posted just further proves that. Actually men with issues like this are paid attention to. Such as? For women, women are expected to have no shred of awkwardness and always sit still. When women have …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/16 08:19 AM
3

I can only imagine they're talking about situations that women get themselves into through their own choices.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/16 08:08 AM
2

men who think women automatically have easy lives Nobody thinks that. Show me one person who has said exactly that. Go ahead. You can't. As for your video, I find it laughable that you think it's supposed to prove anything to the people who you're actually trying to address this question to. So a useless girl who still gets plenty of love and care from her nice, well off family, gets a lot of attention and sympathy from others because she's not quite as useless as everyone thought. Okay? Do you …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/16 08:06 AM
4

I suspect that, if we are ever in a culture that treats teenagers well, the idea that fifteen-year-olds shouldn't vote will be viewed as laughably ageist. Okay, still didn't answer the question really, so I'm going to assume your answer is no. Saying that someone hates children because they think they shouldn't vote is silly. It's not even that they can't vote because they are so much stupider either, it's because they don't do adult stuff, so they shouldn't get to have a say in how adult stuff …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/16 02:13 AM
2

Answer my question first.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/16 06:50 PM
2

There are heaps of hookers out there selling sex for like $100/hr. That doesn't really affect my ability to sell sex for $800/hr Sure it would, if they were just as attractive as you. The girls charging a hundred clearly aren't though, are they?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/16 03:58 AM
2

I didn't accuse them of having that position, I asked them a question. That's not a strawman. But do you honestly think that's why children can't vote? Plenty of kids are smarter than adults who can vote, I'm sure you can admit. So that doesn't explain it, and it's hard to accuse anyone of really "hating" children for being okay with that.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/16 03:56 AM
4

So would you say people who think children shouldn't vote hate children? When you label any opinion you disagree with as "hate", it kind of loses its meaning.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/16 02:36 AM
11

It's still a case of misogyny when women do it What makes you say that? Misogyny is hatred of women, no? So it does it mean they hate women for chastising a certain behavior? It's harmful, competitive bullshit that undermines women's ability to connect to each other properly by unnecessarily pitting us against each other. So then it seems you have no idea why women do this this then. It's not women pitting themselves against each other for absolutely no reason, they do it to shame the women who …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/16 01:55 AM
1

I'm struggling to think of any regular household tasks that require any strength really. What are you talking about?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/16 05:40 AM
1

Him not wanting her for an LTR is in fact him judging her sexuality more harshly. Well if comments on reddit are anything to go by, there seem to be plenty of women that have the same attitude about men with high partner counts too. So the question is how much does partner count actually impact one's ability to find a partner for a LTR for each gender? Do you have anything to back up the claim that women with high partner counts have a significantly more difficult time with that?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/16 12:59 AM
1

That's not a citation, that's you making more unsubstantiated claims. "Slut" is just one of the many names used to chastise promiscuous people. Men are called players, cads, perverts, creeps, etc. Pretending that they don't ever get called names just makes you look like an idiot. That is complete horseshit and the degree of acceptability of men who sleep around can vary wildly in different social circles.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/16 12:56 AM
1

just pulled last week Ah, so you started this thread just to brag. It all makes sense now. If she doesn't pay it she'd be jailed on contempt, just like a man would. LOL! Cute. If I were you I wouldn't hold my breath though. Keep us updated please.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/16 12:15 PM
1

Interesting. For how many kids? Does she actually pay it?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/16 12:07 PM
1

So can you show me a case of that ever actually happening though?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/16 11:56 AM
1

Women are viewed more harshly for having sex citation needed
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/16 08:00 AM
1

blue pill ideology What the hell even is that? People who post on the blue sub even say themselves that they have no belief structure or anything and are just there to "make fun of" red pillers. Or are you talking about literally anyone that doesn't believe in red pill stuff? Because that's super vague too. So this is a pointless question.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/16 07:59 AM
2

abolishing child support would be the most ridiculous thing to ever happen Because making women responsible for their own decisions is so ridiculous. Sure. because an infant has the ability to support itself, right? Like this, look what you're saying. What happened to the mother? It's like you are completely incapable of even CONSIDERING she should be doing anything. According to you, if the father doesn't pay child support, the kid has to take care of itself. Wow! if she makes more than you, sh…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/16 07:50 AM
0

So do you say similar stuff to women who get abortions?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/16 07:42 AM
2

We just don't work that way because we have empathy. Empathy...only for other women, clearly. You are saying this in a thread asking why anyone should give a shit about male suffering. This is why there are so few women who have killed other women. So few women kill others in comparison to how much men do because they can usually just get a guy to do it for her. Women rely on proxy violence because they they have the power to. Anyone with power always uses it to get others to do their dirty work…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/16 08:16 AM
1

a lot of rapists don't realize that what they did qualifies as rape. they don't think having sex with an unconscious girl is rape, or that still going after she says no is rape because she said yes first, or that "she didn't say yes but she didn't explicitly say no and fight me" is rape. that is why there is an effort to teach men not to rape Okay, even ignoring for a second that feminist attempts to prove what you're saying here are the result of asking men vague and misleading questions to get…
/r/MensRights13/07/16 08:27 AM
1

The bechdel test is stupid and does nothing to criticize the movie industry.
/r/MensRights13/07/16 08:08 AM
1

Your question is dumb, as the premise is impossible. Two girls with completely different backgrounds will never have the same personality. The rich girl is guaranteed to be much more spoiled and her personality will be way different.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/16 08:04 AM
1

Also 99% of the people you kill in video games are men. And then in games like GTA where you can kill just as many women as men (but the game doesn't make you), some people still cry about how horrible that is.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/16 10:05 PM
3

Even though you can admit that the average red pill poster does not literally think that "women deserve to be raped", I think you'll agree that most of them likely do hold a lot of opinions on rape that you disagree with. So it'd be tough to claim that many, if any of them, are anything close to what you might describe as something like an "anti-rape advocate". Right? So I think that similarly, even though not all feminists say the kind of things you might be denouncing in this post, most of the…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/16 06:18 AM
1

Sure but I'm not just talking about one feminist contradicting another, I'm saying that even just one feminist will sometimes even contradict themselves, even two sentences apart.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/16 12:48 AM
1

I'm not sure why you're so vehement against the concept of a satire sub I'm not? Where did I say anything like that? I'm just trying to tell you how ridiculous you sound when you claim that you don't ever think about the people that are being talked about on a subreddit you subscribe to. if every single man in the world other than the RP is a beta That's not their position at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/16 09:28 PM
2

Not in the most technical sense, no. I use the Front Page option, sorted to New. So, no, technically I don't. So you are subscribed to it then. Still not helping your case. You're saying you don't think about the people you hate, you're just subscribed to a subreddit dedicated to mocking them. Why are you subscribed then if it's not something you enjoy at least on some level? So you don't log onto reddit with the specific intent of reading about them, but you've decided that it's worth taking a …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/16 08:59 PM
1

What did you think repeating yourself was going to accomplish? Especially after I already said I agreed. HELLO? Seriously, I get that most people don't think about "nice guys". But that's not the topic of the thread. The title is addressed to "Feminists, Bluepillers". That's a specific group of people. Responding with what most people think about is not relevant at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/16 08:48 PM
2

It's not like I hop on Reddit with devilish glee just looking for the first opportunity to mock you guys. So you don't visit r/thebluepill at all? You folks think waaaaaaay too much of yourselves if you think BP has some sort of vendetta against you. What the fuck am I reading here? Are you saying that posters in a subreddit made specifically for people that hate the red pill sub, has nothing against them? Or are you using the blue pill term to describe literally everyone that isn't a poster on …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/16 08:35 PM
0

I specified in my original post that the vast majority of people don't think like this. And I even quoted that and replied with, "I can agree with this". So maybe some paying even the slightest bit of attention to the conversation is in order for you. I just said that's not relevant to the thread topic because it's specifically about blue pill posters.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/16 08:29 PM
2

I never claimed you thought about the people you hate when you wake up in the morning, but you clearly think of them at least when you're on reddit. What do you even think you're arguing here?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/16 08:08 PM
6

1) They don't make everyone feel bad. Sometimes they make people feel good. 2.) Why should anyone care about what makes you feel bad? That's not an argument for anything. I don't believe for second that you care about not hurting everyone's feelings, especially when they're people that have different opinions than you.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/16 08:06 PM
3

What does that have to do with what was said? You: nobody even thinks about incels Me: actually these people on subs dedicated to mocking them clearly do You: rise above it! WTF?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/16 07:36 PM
6

So? Why do comments like that bother you so much? I'm not a fan of them either, but I don't see the point of discouraging them. And again, pretending that women who like compliments don't exist isn't exactly convincing anyone of anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/16 07:33 PM
4

The vast majority of people, irrespective of gender, don't think about the vast majority of people. Okay, I can agree with this, but blue pillers and r/niceguys posters are obviously an exception. They are specifically subreddits made for directing hatred at a group of others. So your post here does not apply to the situation at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/16 06:25 PM
1

feminists and the Bluepillers that side with them truly, on some deep level, wish that all incel men would die That's silly. Why would they want incels to die when they could just tell them to work hard and earn lots of money so one day they can afford to provide for a wife?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/16 06:22 PM
4

Well not every woman is insecure about her intelligence and accomplishments and actually appreciates compliments about her appearance sometimes. So why should everyone do what you say and ignore the desires of those types of women?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/16 06:10 PM
5

If your assertion was true, then buff guys would get little to no action. That's obviously not true though. Your response would likely be something like "well most girls say they don't like a lot of muscle". Even if that was actually true, that still doesn't mean much, because they could just be saying that for a variety of reasons. The main one I would think, is that they're not going to bother showing interest in men they don't think they have a chance with.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/16 06:02 PM
1

You can find convoluted reasons to discriminate against any group of people, that isn't evidence of anything, and it's laughable that you think it is just because our society seems to be okay with it.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/16 10:06 AM
7

Well for example plenty of people still get offended at any mention that women are weaker and less athletic than men.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/16 09:27 AM
0

Did you just google something that sounded science-y and seemed like it would kinda support your point, without bothering to actually read and understand it? Because in the abstract it just says that streamline loss in the brain occurs earlier in females, and that's how they "mature" faster. So basically maturing in this context means brain function deterioration, is what it seems. And I don't think that's what you were trying to argue or what anyone generally means when they claim women mature …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/16 09:24 AM
4

there's scientific evidence that men mature at a slower rate than women There is? Like how?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/16 07:44 AM
0

Rape is a big deal because sperm is cheap plentiful and eggs are in comparison more scarce and valuable. That's why nobody gives a shit when men are raped.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/16 08:47 PM
7

Feminists do not actually want rape to happen less. They couldn't make it more obvious without outright stating it. First of all notice how one of their favorite things to do is point out how often it happens, with things like the one in five stat, and the claims that we live in a "rape culture". This is in attempt to get everyone convinced it's a huge problem, so people will be more likely to be on board with their proposed solutions, and more likely to contribute money to their cause. Then the…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/16 08:40 PM
2

You just said two completely different things. Being "against the draft" means you DON'T want women included. And I used scare quotes because I don't believe they actually give a shit about men being drafted, since they've never even attempted to do anything about it. I think an easy resolution is to at least make yourself eligible to be drafted to have the right to vote.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/16 12:38 AM
1

Care to try to show me literally anyone that says exactly that? Because I'm pretty sure you just wildly misinterpreted whoever you're thinking of.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/16 09:57 PM
1

They know that women exist. They know that women have sex. Sharing stories about what gets them to have sex is not the same as stories about things that there is literally not even any concrete proof of.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/16 09:56 AM
4

I've only seen people say that women who spend a huge amount of time on their career are unattractive. Otherwise they don't give a shit about their job. The idea that anyone thinks that a woman simply having a job makes her less attractive is completely made up.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/16 09:50 AM
4

The first thing your title made me think of is women get to vote but have never been subject to the draft. Hell no do I think that anyone who would never have to go to war get to vote on that. That's the only time I've ever seen anyone argue that men should have more rights so that must be what you're talking about. So explain how that's fair. And by the way I have actually enlisted too before you even think of accusing me of avoiding that responsibility so kiss my dick. Look at how many of thos…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/16 09:35 AM
2

So are you now admitting that they DO need to have their own explanation for things, they just don't have to say it?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/16 12:54 PM
3

Yes because there will be much less of them since women don't want to go to jail. Unless you are saying women really are that short-sighted and stupid.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/16 12:45 PM
5

I already told you, punish the mothers. "But the child!" Yes, the child doesn't need to be raised by their biological mother to have its needs met.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/16 12:42 PM
2

I thought the thread's topic was about how they don't need to though. So did you change your mind about that already?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/16 12:40 PM
5

The child. Nobody seems to care. This is my main point. The child will suffer because the parents are immature. The child suffers in all sorts of situations when the parents are stupid. The thing is that people like you only seem to think it's right to intervene if the situation would in no way benefit a woman. You'd rather the children not get their needs met just to teach the mother a lesson. I did not even come close to saying that. If we're going to give government handouts to shitty mothers…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/16 12:22 PM
2

You just argued against yourself here. You would argue against flat earthers because your alternative explanation is that the earth is round. You argue against westboro because you think gays should be treated differently, like have the right to gay marriage. You don't mock people who propose the earth is flat, then when asked what shape you think the earth is, you respond with "dunno lol, I don't need to explain it". That would make you look just as stupid as them, if not more so. So what's rea…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/16 12:10 PM
2

Since financial abortion doesn't exist, shouldn't men be murdering unborn fetuses all over the place? It's kind of hard to say until you actually let it happen. Maybe women will keep doing dumb shit, and keep getting bailed out. Maybe they'll think much more carefully before having a child knowing they have less of a safety net. The people here live in this imaginary universe where everyone thinks about the consequences of their actions. Good point. Why don't women actually face consequences for…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/16 11:59 AM
3

You could, but I was actually curious. There's no way you expected a serious response to what you said.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/16 02:46 AM
5

Why do you even bother responding if you have nothing to say
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/16 01:05 AM
2

California
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/16 01:04 AM
3

Are you saying this kind of crazy happens regularly with women? Where did you get that from? Is this how desperate you are to argue? I merely said that it has happened, and could be a potential reason for lying about rape. you do agree that women are out to get men How on earth did you get that. I literally named examples of how some women think men are out to get them, as an example of how blue pillers aren't as innocent as you claim they are, and you somehow think this is evidence for your pos…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/16 09:34 PM
2

some dudes that think every woman will sperm-jack them and accuse them of sexual assault at the first chance they get When there are plenty of people out there who not only have no problem with this, but will even outright argue that women shouldn't be punished for these things, what can you expect?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/16 08:40 PM
5

My brother has been trying to get his child support reduced to nothing because he takes cares of the kids half the time and he couldn't get it done because apparently the judge told him if they're under a certain age the mother automatically has primary custody, so he could only get his payment reduced for the older kid. Also the mother didn't even show up to court once.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/16 08:25 PM
2

The RP position on all of this seems to be that women will drop a rape accusation on a guy for any reason whatsoever, just to shit on the guy. It's not always necessarily out of spite, sometimes they'll lie because they got caught cheating, or they don't want to seem like a slut, or even one time I saw a case where a woman lied about being raped as an excuse for being late for work. This is what happens when you don't hold people accountable. There are always going to be people out there that li…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/16 08:14 PM
10

The graph was also made by some random guy on the internet, not the FBI. And it's pretty easy to prove that the fucker was trying to misrepresent the data when he can't even be honest enough to make all the little silhouettes the same actual size.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/16 08:42 PM
4

Why do people pretend like false rape claims don't happen, or are so rare we should ignore them? Because that's all that they really have to argue against due process for men accused of rape, and they can somewhat get away with it since it's very hard to determine how much they actually happen.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/16 10:34 PM
6

laws against revenge porn Seems fair on its face I guess, but also has the potential to be enforced in less than agreeable ways. affirmative consent Lots of women even on reddit will admit that they are turned off by men doing this type of stupid shit. People who bring up this topic just seem like huge social retards and are a minority. I have no reason to give a shit about "affirmative consent" because I don't get involved mentally ill feminists, which are the only people that are at all concer…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/16 09:16 PM
2

I think sometimes people are in relationships with someone less attractive because it keeps them in control of the relationship and there's less effort required to keep it.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/16 08:54 PM
4

It's actually sometimes a percentage of what a judge decides the father should be making.
/r/MensRights29/05/16 04:46 AM
1

Women can't concern themselves about what is more attractive to men There are plenty of women that make their living around making themselves attractive to men.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/16 06:04 PM
3

A lot of women seem to foolishly believe that being a career woman makes them more attractive to men, for one.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/16 08:31 AM
3

IMO it's just pure projection when feminists use the term. Assuming complete ignorance on the part of anyone that disagrees with them is their favorite thing to do. So accusing others of doing the same first is their diversion tactic.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/16 08:17 AM
2

So you say the same thing about women who leave their husbands?
/r/MensRights26/05/16 08:05 AM
5

Have you shopped around for laptops recently? If you are shelling out $800 for one nowadays, you can easily get a good ultrabook that's as light and thin, and has an SSD (which is what makes a computer boot faster and not lose data when dropped) just like a macbook. It'll probably even boot faster with windows, I bought a budget SSD for my old laptop and it's up in 10 seconds now. So you can save even more money by buying a "huge, clunky" one for three to five hundred dollars and put in an SSD y…
/r/MensRights22/05/16 06:52 AM
1

I generally feel the same way as you about donations, and I don't give my money to anyone, but this is different and huge. I'm donating 25 for now and will give more if needed and I see progress. I just found out about this donation page today and I am definitely going to let everyone who I think might be interested know about it.
/r/MensRights18/05/16 01:30 AM
1

So that's a no. They think it's "awesome" but aren't even willing to donate like ten bucks to it? Okay, that's all we needed to know.
/r/MensRights17/05/16 10:07 PM
2

Every feminist I know thinks this is awesome. So you showed them this and they donated?
/r/MensRights17/05/16 09:25 PM
3

Why isn't feminism supporting this?' Does it really have to be said? Why would they want men to have more control over when they have a kid. That means less men getting stuck paying for kids they don't want.
/r/MensRights17/05/16 09:25 PM
3

they simply cannot wrap their minds around the concept of a man so sexually downtrodden that he resorts to paying for sex I think that's actually the exact reason they find it repulsive, because that's what they assume about the guy, even though that isn't necessarily true about him. If a guy is the type that's rich enough that he is actually paying women to leave, I seriously doubt these women would truly feel the same way.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/16 09:07 PM
1

you are no longer debating facts with them, just emotions, which is not serious stuff I feel like that's what I'm doing with you right now.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/16 06:17 AM
1

Do you know why Harvard refuses to have debates with Holocaust Deniers? Or why other universities refuse to host NAMBLA representatives to present their "rational" case for legalizing child molestation? Because they don't feel like it? Look, it's one thing to not always debate people you disagree with, but it's another to NEVER debate them, because then it just looks like you don't even have an argument. Do you get that? Like for example when Lawrence Summers was pressured to resign for his hypo…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/16 11:18 PM
3

Yes, sexists and racists always lose in the end because their views are inherently indefensible. I agree. And I am anti-PC for that reason, because there is nothing to fear from those people expressing their opinions, and it is healthy for them to be brought up so everyone can be reminded of why they have been discarded. So did I change your view? What? When women got the vote, or when slavery was abolished, do you think that was accomplished with the same tactics that people in modern PC cultur…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/16 03:53 AM
3

"She is a woman, her opinion does not count." If this is supposed to be in reference to women not getting universal suffrage the same time as men, that was mainly because they weren't conscripted like men were, so they didn't have the same investment in their country. Not to mention plenty of women like Emma Goldman arguing that women that women shouldn't vote as well. It wasn't just "women's opinions are worthless" like you seem to think. "Black people are are 3/5 of a white person and can't vo…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/16 03:12 AM
4

Would you want to be friends with or associate at all with a racist or sexist? No, right? Then why would you want to make those people harder to identify? Something else must be up. Stopping people from expressing an opinion does not keep them from having it, it only keeps it from being spread. What people like you want is for any opinion that you dislike to be labeled as "hate speech" or whatever, so you can keep those ideas from being spread. You want that because your own ideas suck and you h…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/16 01:03 AM
3

Those guys aren't even super buff, they just have really low body fat. I think it's just the veins that are putting you off.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/16 06:53 AM
1

Well if you ask some guys and girls to decorate a room, they're obviously going to do it differently. Men and women tend to have different aesthetic preferences separate from what they find sexually attractive. So I guess you just have some features that other women like or wish they had, but do not turn men on. This is of course assuming they aren't complimenting you out of pity as others have already suggested.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/16 09:13 PM
1

You are so determined to label TRP a safe space, but you can't even come up with a definition that applies to both it and the feminist version. Maybe you should have thought this through a little more before you attempted to do that just so you could call them hypocrites. But anyway you should have maybe tried to understand why it is that anyone criticizes feminist safe spaces in the first place. I have no problems with feminist safe spaces existing, when they are just random internet forums. Wh…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/16 07:30 PM
1

a space that encourages discussion and debate without personal attacks. So then TRP is not a safe space by your own definition, because it allows personal attacks. Glad we managed to sort this out.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/16 06:28 PM
1

I am not actually a member or active participant of the red pill community, and I am not exactly clear on what they ban people for. I'd guess that's mostly up to the mods to determine on a case by case basis, and their own personal biases often come into play. aren't you being a hypocrite for bashing feminist safe spaces for doing the same? Can you point to me where exactly you think I have been "bashing feminist safe spaces"? Is that really how you interpreted my brief description of them? I no…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/16 05:48 PM
0

When I said "all by yourself", I didn't mean that literally as you the individual, but you and other feminists. A lot of feminists seem to have a different definition of bigotry and what should be considered "unjustifiable prejudice" than others do. Like for example the crap about it being prejudice plus power, so you can't be sexist against men or whatever. These are certainly not the people I want to trust with being in charge of ridding the world of bigotry, if I even thought that was a worth…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/16 05:31 PM
1

we DON'T...force people to agree to the basic tenets of feminism, ban arguments They don't exist to constantly have to defend their ideology and goals So which is it?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/16 05:10 PM
1

How is a world where there are fewer bigots a bad thing? Because you don't get to decide what counts as bigotry, and the proper way to get rid of it all by yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/16 04:35 PM
1

Care to define what exactly a feminist safe space is then? I thought I was being quite charitable with my description of one. I even forgot to mention the worst part about them, which is how they like to sometimes completely ban men. By the way, what I know about them actually comes from my experience of trying to talk about gender issues in some of them.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/16 04:30 PM
0

everyone should have control of their own (consensual*) sex life without being judged by others Says the person with the blue pill flair? Um...
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/16 10:08 PM
3

What do you think a safe space is? By your definition it seems that every forum with moderators that bans users for straying from the discussion topic is a safe space. If I'm not mistaken, a feminist safe space is a place where nobody says anything offensive, there's no arguing, and everyone must agree with the basics of feminism. In contrast, posters on TRP try to be offensive as possible, and there's a decent amount of arguing. As far as I know you'll only be banned if you don't agree with the…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/16 10:03 PM
18

Well first of all feminism operates under the assumption that women have it worse than men in general, so that is why they focus on women's issues. That premise is bullshit to me, women have it better than men by almost every metric imaginable. Life expectancy, incarceration, standard of living, etc. Every example of women having it worse that feminists can come up with is either something really trivial like "catcalling", or totally misleading bullshit, like "there are more women in poverty" (i…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/16 06:29 PM
1

Okay. But where a lot of other people live, that's not exactly case.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/16 05:09 PM
1

Lol dude are you seriously pretending that nobody hates gays or trannies?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/16 05:43 AM
1

It's a nice thought, but a flimsy excuse I'm sorry, what were your excuses again? "Paternity fraud isn't likely", and "you should get control over your information about your body"? You seriously think those are better arguments than preventing illness? Kids don't have a right to know their medical history. Why shouldn't they? Thanks for clearly stating this is your position by the way.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/16 10:39 PM
1

I can promise you I'm not a female supremacist. You can promise me whatever you want, but that's not up for you to decide for me. In most cases, the claimed farther is the real father. If there was mandatory paternity testing, we could know this for certain. For now, that's a statement you can't really prove though, even though it seems likely. In those cases, the mother feeling offended by a lack of trust is justified. So if a woman has a kid with the man she's with, that means she must have ne…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/16 07:13 PM
1

Here's something you female supremacists always seem to forget here when it's convenient for you: the best interests of the child. Shouldn't they have access to their biological parents' medical history to help prevent and treat anything they may be genetically predisposed to? Oh no, but your hurt feelings over not being "trusted" are more important, I forget.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/16 05:58 PM
2

woosh
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/16 02:41 AM
2

If you have little in the way of personality, character, wit, or wisdom to offer That describes every girl who complains about objectification anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/16 12:18 AM
1

Yes, I saw that. Since you keep insisting that the only time a guy would get a vasectomy and his sperm frozen is for reasons that you made up in your head, after I just told you the real reason, that makes your true thoughts on this more clear. A man doesn't have to desire promiscuity for the procedure to be a wise choice, because even if he was just seeing one girl, and kids are something they've discussed before, there's always the possibility that she hasn't told the truth, or she changed her…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/16 06:36 PM
2

So I was right then.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/16 04:01 AM
2

It's not silly at all when it's the only way men can have absolute control over when and who they have a kid with. Sounds like maybe even that's the exact reason you would find it "unattractive".
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/16 01:54 AM
2

There is no such thing scientifically as having empathy for some people and not others. O rly? http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15491274 If men were better at logic, it would be easy to find out. On tests of logic, women would get certain questions wrong that men were more likely to get right. This is not what has been found over decades if research on I.Q. I think what people have in mind when they say things like that are how men are more likely to pursue careers in STEM, while women prefer …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/16 01:27 AM
2

If she is so pissed about cultural appropriation Did you NOT see that smile on her face? She's clearly not mad at all. She more than likely doesn't even believe in any of the shit she's saying. These people just enjoy arguing with others and trying to control them. Whatever comes out their mouths doesn't actually mean anything.
/r/MensRights29/03/16 10:53 PM
3

They may come off that way on an internet forum you can only communicate by text, but that doesn't mean they're anything like that face to face.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/16 04:30 AM
3

how many women pass your attractiveness threshold for marriage? Zero. Marriage is a scam. how many are good enough for just a night? Depends on if they're the ones pursuing me. If I'm the one being propositioned, maybe like 30-40%. If I'm the one that needs to do the work? Like 5%.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/16 04:07 AM
2

TRP took this and ran with it, extrapolating to "All men are smarter than all women Show me literally just one person that says this.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/16 03:59 AM
3

Autist is kind of just a popular general insult on the internet. But anyway it's supposed to be a dig at someone's lack of social skills. Autists have trouble recognizing the more subtle forms nonverbal communication between people, so they have a harder time getting along with others and making friends. They're also known for their eccentric hobbies and interests, which adds to their problem of them not being easy to relate to, and gives others more fodder for ridiculing them.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/16 03:56 AM
15

close enough http://www.motherjones.com/kevin-drum/2016/03/marriage-declining-men-pigs
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/16 08:41 PM
1

You mean the question in the title? If abortion was illegal, and the mother was forced to have a kid when she didn't want it, and couldn't take care of it, I don't see the point of making her pay child support if the father is willing and able to take care of the child. Is that what you were asking for?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/16 02:47 AM
1

Respond to what?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/16 02:40 AM
1

you're too damn degenerate to deserve the flippin bastard Nobody is asking for that. That was a pathetic attempt at changing the topic.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/16 12:21 AM
2

She can't unilaterally put it up for adoption Uh, yes she can, if she really wanted to. Imagine a situation where the mother isn't even sure of who the father is, or their full name. Do you think there is some magical device out there that can find and identify the father? If he decides to keep the baby and she wants to adopt it out, she's required to pay child support. Stop pretending to be so clueless.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/16 05:38 PM
2

Your criticism makes no sense. Nobody can force you to accept any opinion you don't want to. It's just a forum where you read things, not a service you pay for. How hard is it to just ignore posts about subjects that don't interest you?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/16 07:41 PM
8

In any scenario, the best possible outcome from law enforcement is for a crime to not occur. LOL! Oh you sweet little naive child. When crime doesn't happen, the cops make crime happen. If they aren't catching criminals, they don't look like they're doing their jobs, so it becomes harder to earn a promotion, or justify more money from the state, and there's less direct revenue from fines they collect. That's how the real world works. Similar thing happening with all the fuss about rape. Rape kee…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/16 08:36 AM
1

What kind of seasoning do you normally like to use?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/16 02:42 AM
6

Why do girls like to bite and call guys they think are hot "yummy"? Do they secretly want to eat men?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/16 02:13 AM
1

Which is why you said "irresponsible guy's sex life"?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/16 01:43 AM
2

Okay so man and woman choose to have sex. Woman chooses to keep the kid. Woman can't pay for decision she made by herself. Somehow completely the guy's fault. Okay.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/16 01:39 AM
2

It doesn't benifit anyone to have to pay for some irresponsible guys sex life. The responsibility lies solely on the woman, since it's her body and her choice. Guys can't force women to have kids. It's amazing the mental gymnastics people go through to blame men for anything women do.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/16 01:20 AM
13

Nobody on TBP genuinely believes that men and women are 100% the same with 100% the same interests all the freaking time Of course, they only insist that men and women share the same interests when it's convenient to any argument they try to make.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/16 01:17 AM
2

oftentimes it's a bit of a burden to be the single outlet he has for emotional intimacy But then isn't that a form of power women have over men though? I wouldn't be surprised if women are somehow the ones primarily responsible for causing men to be the ones to be so afraid of being perceived as gay, that they can only rely on receiving physical intimacy from women without some sort of social shaming.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/16 11:11 PM
1

The only reason anyone needs for flaking on dates is that you don't owe anyone that kind of attention. That's it. Coming up with a bunch of excuses about how you're scared that men will attack you just makes you sound like a man hating bitch.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/16 11:30 PM
6

She, by her own admission, has opportunities as a woman that could make her life easier. That's exactly what people mean when they say that women have it easy. It actually doesn't sound like much of an argument against anything at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/16 11:26 PM
4

And what kinds of things could a man do if he was willing to burn his morals to the ground and do some soul-crushing dirty work? That women couldn't do? You tell us.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/16 11:18 PM
1

And your opinion on men doing dangerous jobs?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/16 09:35 PM
2

Feminists: We demand quotas and special treatment for women in male dominated fields! We also demand that you don't acknowledge that we asked for this and assume that every woman is equally competent and didn't get to where they are because of our work!
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/16 07:53 PM
1

"women have privilege because men choose to work more dangerous jobs" Nobody says that, you have never actually seen anyone say that. I can maybe understand if you think that's what people are getting at when they bring up men working more dangerous jobs, but it's not. The point that's being made is that if people are going to give a shit about workplace equality when it comes to certain sexes being underrepresented, dangerous jobs should be included in that discussion. Otherwise you if only car…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/16 07:48 PM
2

They are fucking losers with all the free time in the world and controlling information that is available to everyone is pretty much the only way they can "win" any debates. Censorship is very important to them which is why they try so hard to get moderator positions in popular subreddits.
/r/MensRights03/03/16 07:12 AM
2

Like I've also said in the post, I've seen TRP'ers state that they wouldn't hire/work with/trust women because "All guns are loaded". That is the exact thing that TRP gets upset over. What exact thing? I'm not mad that there are women out there that don't trust men and don't want to work with them.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/16 03:30 AM
2

they simply assume that every women has certain negative qualities and TRP let's their behaviour around women be influenced by that From my understanding, it's not that every woman for certain has those negative qualities, it's that they all have the potential to, so it's wise to always put yourself in a position where that potential behavior will harm you the least. That means not doing unnecessarily stupid things that can easily be avoided, not shunning women altogether. After all, the whole p…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/16 03:20 AM
3

Since women are the ones who ultimately decide when and who they have a child with, it usually says a lot about their character when end up raising that child alone, with obvious exceptions like the father dying though. Plus, guys generally hate the idea of investing a large amount of time and resources into children that aren't theirs.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/02/16 11:39 PM
0

Presidential elections are like wrestling. Fake and gay.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/02/16 12:06 AM
0

WTF is "hate speech", and who gets to define it? I'd consider a lot of what feminists regularly say to be hate speech, but obviously they wouldn't agree. So who gets to decide and what would even be the point of anyone stating they are against "hate speech"? That seems about as vague and useless as saying "I don't like bad things".
/r/PurplePillDebate29/02/16 12:03 AM
2

Police profiling and prison sentencing.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/16 11:51 PM
2

When you ask people what they're attracted to, they're going to respond with the rational part of their brain. That means they're going to be thinking about things like who they'll have a chance with, and who they think will have more power in the relationship. I've even heard some women explicitly say things like "I'd never date a guy prettier than me". What people are viscerally turned on by though is usually going to be completely different. Bloopies especially are exactly the type of people …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/16 11:08 PM
3

You are more likely to get away with rape than be convicted of rape. Even if you could somehow prove that to be true (you can't), that doesn't matter because being convicted of rape is only one of the possible many negative outcomes that can come from being accused.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/16 02:45 AM
12

Some people are pretty obvious about how they don't like men gathering. Male only places have been deemed as sexist and have been banned altogether now, while some insist that women need their own "safe spaces" away from men. Also even communities that do not explicitly exclude women, but are predominately comprised of men, are usually attacked by feminists. Cries about misogyny are only a convenient excuse and a weapon they use.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/16 06:22 AM
9

The fact that you deny that before anyone else said anything remotely like it hints otherwise.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/16 06:16 AM
1

They don't "fail" to see any of that really. It's just their attempt at controlling language, which influences peoples' thoughts and actions. They see the word sexism as a powerful tool to get what they want (although it's of course losing that power now), and they don't want it to be used against them and what they want accomplished.
/r/MensRights22/02/16 11:09 PM
7

Because they might put on an act just long enough before the marriage?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/16 11:27 PM
14

Same reason employers care about job history. Looking at the past is a good way to predict future behavior.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/16 09:44 PM
2

she can't sleep with the man she is dating too soon or else he won't LTR her This is a lie that women tell themselves to make themselves feel better when they get pumped and dumped. If a guy doesn't LTR a girl who slept with him "too soon", he wasn't going to do it anyway, and waiting wasn't going to change anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/16 09:45 PM
1

Or maybe you completely misinterpreted them
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/16 10:42 PM
0

No, I don't believe that anyone usually says those kinds of things, especially to girls. Not that I don't think people can't be assholes. I don't think you talk to very many people if you think those are believable things someone would say.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/16 10:05 PM
1

"Lol you're just being whiny. It can't be THAT bad!" "You're just being lazy, don't you go to the gym anyways?" So you need a word to use for imaginary situations you made up in your head? Do you really expect anyone to believe anyone has said these things to you?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/16 09:12 PM
1

You really think he supports incest even after he specifically says "i have always been opposed to incest, and still am"?? And you expect me, or anyone at all, to take you seriously? can you at least admit that maybe there's a good reason for him being controversial, especially among feminists? Sure, but it's not because of his stances on incest or date rape. Those two little quotes from him on that just get brought up by feminists because it distracts people from the work he's more known for, a…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/16 01:47 AM
13

Feminists are against the idea of women being told to defend themselves because they want men to do that for them. Expecting women to be responsible for their own safety, or responsible for anything at all, is anathema to them.
/r/MensRights12/02/16 10:51 PM
2

I didn't post those links for you, but for everyone else who may have been misled by your claims. Anyone who seriously thinks that he advocates incest has clearly already made up their minds and only cares about finding ways to shit talk people they don't like.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/16 10:14 PM
6

Context and further elaboration from him in some AMAs he did for a couple of these points: He has excused rape by stating that a non-verbal "yes" is more important than an explicit, verbal "no" when determining consent. https://www.reddit.com/r/IAmA/comments/24accd/hi_im_warren_farrell_author_of_the_myth_of_male/ch55mor He has spoken explicitly in favor of parent-child incest being a positive thing in some cases. https://www.reddit.com/r/IAmA/comments/18tv7j/i_am_warren_farrell_author_of_why_men…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/16 01:14 AM
1

I swear this thread topic was done just the other day. I came up a with a new idea for all you people who wanna cry about the best interests of the child though. The child gets support from the father, okay. But if the mother can't support the child by herself, she gets thrown in jail and doesn't get to see her kid. The child doesn't end up being raised by such a selfish and irresponsible person who would make such a horrible decision as to bring a child into this world that they can't properly …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/16 03:38 AM
1

Okay you're definitely a troll.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/16 08:53 PM
2

They know they can just get themselves knocked up if they ever see themselves being deployed to a combat zone so really they shouldn't have much reason to care.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/16 08:49 PM
3

Why is the mother choosing to have the child if she can't afford to take care of it on her own? Shouldn't she be punished for making such a reckless decision? That should keep the amount of children that the taxpayers have to support low enough.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/16 08:47 PM
1

What about them? Okay they probably do it for different reasons. Doesn't mean their intent is always to make you uncomfortable.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/16 01:19 AM
2

I don't know you, so I don't know what's wrong with you. Maybe it's your attitude. Your hair is probably something you can improve on if I had to guess though. Get a straightening iron or see a stylist.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/16 01:10 AM
1

I am not arguing that guys don't prefer white women. You're moving the goal posts because you know what you originally said is not true. Having dark skin does not automatically make a woman ugly, you're just using that as an excuse because you're too lazy to improve yourself. It's a disadvantage, sure, but it certainly isn't a deal breaker for most men.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/16 10:20 PM
2

Who has the money fort that? Like literally almost anyone with a decent job and some spending sense? Dark skin is considered ugly by most men No it isn't, not by most men. Like I said, excuses.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/16 09:16 PM
0

a way that has zero chance of any kind of successful outcome It's not a zero percent chance. It's small, but it's not zero. There's really no other reason How about the most obvious one? Guys who catcall are clearly not putting any thought into their behavior. There is no way they are thinking what you're saying here. It's impulsive behavior done mostly by drunks and bums.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/16 08:45 PM
4

Catcalling is about power. Telling that girl that you don't care about her as a person and simply see her as a sex object I think you've been reading too many feminist writings.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/16 08:12 PM
2

Everyone can be bothered by whatever they want and complain about it and I won't care. The second that women expect me to do something about "catcalling" or "street harassment" though is when I will tell them to fuck off. Okay so a random guy annoyed you on the street. So? That shit doesn't only happen to you. It's not a big deal. Just because you feel threatened doesn't mean you are, I'm not falling for that.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/16 07:59 PM
2

There's always cosmetic surgery. Stop making excuses.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/16 07:52 PM
6

Simple answer is that men and women are attracted to different things. You can speculate as to why and cry about how unfair it is all you want, but that's the way it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/16 05:13 AM
2

Why do people only give a shit when women are raped and not when men are?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/16 05:06 AM
2

The right not to have their genitals cut at birth. The right to be federally employed and whatever other benefits are taken away from men who don't register for selective service. The right to be treated equality for the same crimes, and all sorts of other unfair enforcement of laws like title IX and VAWA. Were you genuinely ignorant of all this? If so then I hope my answer satisfies you. If not then this is pretty much the kind of stuff people are talking about with men's rights and i don't thi…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/16 04:08 AM
1

He can't pay much attention if he was never informed he was a father. Point being is that realistically there is almost zero chance of a mother needing the father's consent to put a kid up for adoption. You know that, I don't know why we're even having this discussion.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/16 07:20 AM
2

the problem of children being raised in poverty will magnify OR, get this, maybe, just MAYBE, less women will choose to carry to term children when the father isn't willing, since they know they won't have any support from him. So therefore the amount of children raised in poverty will not increase at all, and possibly even DECREASE. Maybe.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/16 04:01 AM
1

And so what part of that amounts to "a child cannot be adopted without the man's consent"? It's entirely reasonable that mother would actually have no idea who the father really is. Or she could just lie and say she doesn't. There is almost no way to inform the father if the mother doesn't want to.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/16 03:52 AM
1

Why do you think it's more fair for the rest of society to pay instead of the responsible party? You're right, it's not fair. Women should be taxed more.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/16 03:39 AM
3

The child cannot be adopted out without the man's consent. Since when does the mother even have to name the father?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/16 03:37 AM
1

The laws are unfair for the good of society, a society that abandons its children abandons its future. I didn't know you knew what's good for society. Incentiving single motherhood and punishing people for choices they didn't make is good for society apparently!
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/16 02:58 AM
3

Surely he should be with an 18 year old virgin? Well he probably is with one too. These guys can get with anyone they want. And they do. Their "main chick" is the one who is willing to do the most for them outside of fucking, and also meets their minimum standards. That is not likely to be a super high quality woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/16 08:58 AM
3

They're not allowed to work The horror! Made to have other people take care of them. Poor, poor, oppressed womyn. Almost as bad as child labor laws, but it's women, so of course it's worse. or drive So basically men have to drive them everywhere like they're the fucking president or the pope. Oh no, how terrible. some of these women actually want to wear the burqa Yeah, and you don't think women don't want to have to work or drive? Societies are always going to have disagreements on what is the …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/16 04:47 AM
1

You've talked to hundreds of thousands of men? Wow.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/16 12:44 AM
1

There are a stunning number of males who enjoy rape fantasies and making girls squirm in consensual fear. So what is a "stunning number", and how would you know?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/16 02:52 PM
3

So what's your point?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/16 11:23 PM
3

You know that when you have a job, you usually have a boss, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/16 11:16 PM
3

I'd be so mad if I wasn't allowed to do dangerous work and risk my life for others. So mad I tell you!
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/16 10:29 PM
5

I agree. I don't think anyone should be afraid of calling themselves a feminist, or a racist, or whatever can be considered hateful. Shaming people for the opinions they hold doesn't guarantee that they will stop having them, it'll only result in them being less obvious that they have them. That's not very helpful to those who want to stay away from those people. If feminists actually cared about bigotry and accepted that they cannot fully eliminate it, you'd at least see some of them with a pos…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/16 10:16 PM
1

Everyone's in here talking about morals and shit, but forgetting to think about what anyone would actually get out of rape. A lot of the pleasure that comes from being intimate with someone else is the feeling of being desired in return. There's not going to be a lot of gratification coming from the act of forcing sex on someone who doesn't want it for most people. So there's not a whole lot of motivation for many to rape even if there were no legal repercussions.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/16 07:47 PM
7

Well I can only assume that almost all guys who read TRP do it because they want do better with women. How do you think you can help him with that in ways that TRP cannot? Would you object to him using the sub as a source of information altogether?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/16 01:55 AM
5

Wouldn't you at least want to find out why he's reading it first before assuming something is wrong? I would have to find a way to rectify it, stat By that do you mean, find out how to get him to stop reading it?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/16 01:38 AM
3

Better, but for one that is still barely related to women being less likely to take up positions of leadership, and two, there's a lot of conflicting research on the topic as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/16 06:07 AM
3

They are, you just don't hear about it because it doesn't sell papers (or draw clicks) so you rarely hear about it unless you're actually in feminist circles. People asking for lowered standards for women so men can pick up their slack makes the news often. I just don't think that's the kind of "equality" he was saying feminists should be striving for if they want to prove they're not simply female supremacists.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/16 05:51 AM
3

the answer seems to be that people are prejudiced against women even when they produce the exact same work as men. Example, orchestra auditions God that fucking orchestra audition is one of the only things that feminists ever point to and somehow you expect everyone to accept that as sufficient evidence of the bold ass statement you just made? Uh, no, it doesn't work like that. In order to prove something you need to have the results repeated many times by many different people, otherwise you ca…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/16 05:46 AM
4

most rules and laws did not apply to women. LOL source that please. Remind me what sex prisons are full of again? But anyway there was this thing called coverture that made the husband have all the rights and responsibilities in a marriage. This is where the misconception that women didn't have the right to own property comes from, because technically everything was in the husband's name. But this legal doctrine also meant that he was responsible for all kinds of bad shit that she did, because i…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/16 05:28 AM
8

Apparently someone is already getting defensive because they know they're full of shit. Let's look at your examples of "feminists fighting for men's rights". The first is just an article talking about some instances of police brutality against women. Even if it was about actually doing something, it still doesn't have shit to do with men. Then we get a few links discussing how circumcision "should" be a feminist issue. Again nothing about what feminists have actually done for men, just some lip …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/16 08:41 PM
4

And so do you actually have any evidence of feminists doing any of that? Or am I just supposed to take your word for it?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/16 06:25 PM
1

You can think those things are manipulative and chastise others for doing them all you want. Or you can accept that most people are going to do that shit anyway and there's nothing you can do to stop it, so you might as well play the game yourself. That is the difference between you and TRP, you are naive enough to think that whining enough about how others act is going accomplish anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/16 05:55 PM
1

So when women lie or are vague about stuff like their age and sexual history, do you consider that manipulation?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/16 05:44 PM
7

When do they fight for men's rights?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/16 05:37 PM
1

Are you just talking about agreeing that men and women should have equal rights and counting that as a "feminist view"? Because one explanation for that is people might not believe that feminists properly work toward that. If you are just talking about any specific view about the wage gap or rape stats or whatever, it's probably because that kind of shit gets said everywhere and it's easy to believe in that kind of stuff if you don't really question or think about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/16 05:28 PM
6

So then explain to me why whenever I see a male feminist, he is almost always some autistic fat neckbeard. See: Barry Deutsch, David Futrelle, the guy in this video. Those are just some of the most popular examples I can think of off the top of my head, I've seen plenty more. What makes you think these ugly losers embrace feminism rather than reject it the way you predict they would?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/16 02:56 AM
4

The Declaration of Sentiments clearly ripped off the Declaration of Independence, which was drafted when the colonies were at war with Great Britain. So basically you are pointing out to everyone that that feminism instigated a sex war. Good job. It's not over until women around the world are represented in equal measures in positions of power. Then you are admitting that will never happen, because why the fuck would women want to give up all the special treatment they get in the pursuit of this…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/16 01:40 AM
-2

Nah son. You're just naive if you took everything said at face value.
/r/MensRights12/01/16 01:14 AM
-2

/r/iamverysmart
/r/MensRights11/01/16 08:11 PM
-6

Cry more faggot. You don't get to decide what we talk about here.
/r/MensRights11/01/16 07:53 PM
-3

"I am not interested in risking men's lives to live my selfish dream" Says the woman who thinks only men should risk their lives in combat roles while she doesn't have to. K Not that what a lot of what she says isn't likely true though. It just annoys me when women like this try to frame their position of cowardice as some noble desire to look out for men's interests. Just fucking admit that you want men to protect you and show your fucking gratitude for them when they do.
/r/MensRights11/01/16 07:52 PM
3

No it doesn't. Maybe to man haters.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/16 05:08 AM
4

Any kind of man they deem unworthy.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/16 05:07 AM
4

Well yeah if you let feminist shaming influence you, that is your own fault, but don't pretend that there aren't plenty of feminists really do want to prevent certain men from having sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/16 03:27 AM
1

when a married couple divorces and splits the marital aspects, men 100% see it as her stealing away half of what is rightfully HIS. Can you give me some examples of what you're talking about? Because the way I see it is that men just want to keep what they brought into the marriage and what they paid for.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/16 03:26 AM
1

Assuming we are talking female prostitutes, I don't see why this law would't apply if the male was prostituting Because the law is to protect women, and only them, just like you said. That's why. You might not see why, but I have little faith that this law would exist if the female demand for male prostitutes was anywhere near what it is female prostitutes.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/16 03:09 AM
9

Can you explain to me how the fuck men create single mothers? Women are the ones that decide to go through with pregnancy, men can't force that on women. It's 100% the woman's decision. Women create single mothers, not men. And that is exactly why they are hated, because they chose to bring a child into this world without making sure the father wants to be a part of its life, or straight up refused to let him take that role even if he did.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/16 03:06 AM
1

if you choose to outlaw prostitution with the goal to protect women Of course it's not a "conspiracy" when people like you outright say it. If the goal is to protect women, then that is sexist and discriminatory.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/16 01:22 AM
3

The thing is that you don't get to decide what people need all by yourself. Especially when you're as bad as articulating your thoughts and reasons as you've shown me so far. And personally I believe that people having easier access to physical intimacy with others is a lot better for a person's mental health, and by extension society in general, than if they were forced to make their own shoes.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/16 01:14 AM
2

Yeah, yeah. "It's different", and again you can't (or won't) really explain why. complaining that the Nordic model is somehow oppressing men is stupid. No u
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/16 01:04 AM
2

Yes, but you don't believe in outlawing all shoes just because some of them are made by children.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/16 12:55 AM
1

Sex slavery is very different Yeah, yea, I get that, obviously. Otherwise I wouldn't be pointing out that people treat them differently. But I believe the reasons that it's different aren't being honestly discussed. That's why you and others like you have such difficulty explaining why it's different. Like you can't explain why nobody wants to make buying shoes illegal, or why society "needs" things like shoes that are produced by cheap labor any more than it needs a way for people to have an ea…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/16 12:43 AM
2

It's to protect the women. So are you saying in cases of female clients seeking male prostitutes, the laws would be different? they are not hurting anyone by being one Well one could argue that by being one, they are creating a supply which feeds addictions, and can lead to ruined lives, similar to drug dealers. That's about as abstract as the bullshit about users creating a demand. Or you can just admit that two people agreeing to a simple exchange of goods and services harms no one, other than…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/16 12:19 AM
2

Well, I don't think there really has to be much human suffering caused by a law for it to still be considered unjust. Do you? But anyway throwing anyone in prison is still a form of suffering, whether or not you feel they deserve to be there, is it not? And even you seem to be able to admit that not everyone who seeks the services of a prostitute has done something wrong. So you seem to be okay with trowing people in prison when they haven't done anything wrong? That's where you and I disagree, …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/16 11:50 PM
6

the easiest way to make sure you abolish harmful prostitution is the outlaw all prostitution That's not even an argument for outlawing all prostitution, let alone a good one like you said. there is a big difference. We need shoes in our society, we don't need prostitution. Actually, there's not that big of a difference. Why shouldn't you have to settle for making your own shoes to make sure that they aren't made by someone who was forced to? You don't need someone else to make your shoes for you…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/16 11:33 PM
7

if you decide to outlaw it, which also has good arguments going for it Like what? buying shoes made by slave children isn't illegal, but I'm all for making it so And so by extension, do you think that all shoes should be illegal to buy, because some of them have been made by slave labor? If not, then what makes you apply the same reasoning to prostitution?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/16 11:21 PM
8

Prostitution was made illegal to protect women From what though? The people who want to force women into it? Nobody thinks those people shouldn't be punished. What is so hard about going after those guys instead of just outlawing prostitution altogether if that's the only problem people have? A men who goes to a prostitute may be actually facilitating women being forced into prostitution, he may thus be part of the problem. Prostitution isn't the only thing people are forced into though. Many th…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/16 11:00 PM
1

the reply from the TRPer will ostensibly ignore a lot of arguments, and instead focus on other parts of my comment So you argue in bad faith and try to change the topic when you know you can't win an argument, and you don't like it when they don't fall for it?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/16 10:45 PM
5

therefore it is a failing of society to protect them That's just further proof that feminism isn't about equality then, because of who they think it is society's duty to protect from such circumstances. If a man is forced into a shitty and dangerous job because of his circumstances, nobody gives a shit. In fact, they are often even encouraged into doing them.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/16 10:17 PM
6

sex slavery exists Sure, but that still doesn't justify punishing every guy that goes to see a hooker, even if they end up seeing a girl that is being forced into it, because how the fuck are they supposed to know? It's like if you went to walmart and bought a shirt, and it just so happens to the product of child labor, should you be punished? Now imagine punishing everyone who bought a shirt at walmart at all, just because you suspect that they are all the products of child labor, even if all o…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/16 10:13 PM
4

If you choose to make prostitution illegal, it makes sense to go after the clients, they make prostitution possible. So then why do you think nobody has the same idea with literally anything else? Like drugs for example. Go after the only regular users, not the dealers. It also still doesn't explain why prostitution should be illegal in the first place.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/16 10:05 PM
3

Lol so I'm guessing a dude did something similar to you?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/16 01:50 AM
6

What exactly is she the victim of? Being the subject of unwanted attention? So am I a victim every time some hambeast tries to flirt with me? Christ.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/16 01:12 AM
1

if I were given the choice of being a man or a woman in a primitive world, I would choose the gender that doesn't give birth Okay so then amuse me, why would you make that choice?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/16 01:08 AM
2

Not everything has to be a men versus women thing. WTF. This conversation started because you said you'd rather be a hunter/soldier than take your chances with child birth sans modern health care. Are you really that forgetful or were you just hoping that I was?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/16 12:49 AM
4

Being a useless pedant did not successfully distract me from noticing that you did not answer the question. DO YOU SERIOUSLY THINK THAT MORE WOMEN IN HISTORY HAVE DIED DURING CHILD BIRTH THAN MEN HAVE DIED FIGHTING OTHER PEOPLE OR ANIMALS? Even if you do, you know there is no evidence to support that belief, so your entire argument is bullshit. It's estimated that during our hunter-gatherer days up to 25% of births resulted in maternal death. 25% is the very highest estimate according to your ow…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/16 11:57 PM
4

You seriously think you'd have a better chance of living by fighting things that are trying to kill you than doing something that the human body is naturally designed to do?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/16 10:05 PM
3

Yes, if feminism had no meaningful impact on his life. But the reality is that feminists are real people with real influence on the world. At some point some men are going to interact with with them and they won't always agree with them.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/16 03:08 AM
1

I never argued that. But for anything more than a one a night stand, I'd seriously consider bringing up that topic at some time.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/16 03:04 AM
1

Yeah but would you actually want to sleep with any woman that hates the idea of financial abortions? I definitely wouldn't. I'm honestly to starting think that bringing up that sort of thing is a good idea.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/16 02:52 AM
8

Don't most women have jobs? Are they gonna pay my bills and buy me shit? Is that something I can reasonably expect from most women? Don't women still do the majority of the housework Only if you count how women spend more time on menial tasks that men don't give a fuck about, and don't count all the research and training that goes into what men do around the house. and childcare? Do you honestly think that's something men want? To spend less time with their own kids?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/16 02:43 AM
4

He said men are confused. He doesn't speak for men. He sounds like an idiot. Housework disgusts him? What does he live with his parents who still do everything for him? Does he never clean up after himself? WTF
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/15 09:41 PM
5

Because they are not incentivizing "good" behavior in men (with sex). Not that I personally believe they should, but I think that's the argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/15 07:26 PM
-1

For women, being a virgin often means specifically not having a penis go in their vagina. I can't put any faith into those kinds of surveys.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/15 07:10 PM
25

Feminism just gives women an excuse (patriarchy! male privilege! rape culture!) for being bad at life. CMV
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/15 02:26 AM
3

A generalization about men and women is not the same as a generalization about TRPers. True. But a large portion of blue pillers are feminists who believe in ideas like men being privileged and women being oppressed. Those are generalizations about men and women too. Blue pillers don't have problem with generalizations, it's just something that they say when they come across one that they don't want to accept.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/15 02:16 AM
2

What rules does TRP say that women have to play by? TBP is the only group of people I see here trying to enforce any rules. So by your reasoning, it's TBP who's the one that trying not to play fair. If that's what you were trying to say in the first place though, I agree.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/15 02:09 AM
3

No. TBP pretends to care about morals, but from my perspective they are some of the most blatantly immoral people around, even by their own self proclaimed standards. Most of the behavior they attempt to chastise TRP for, they're guilty of themselves tenfold. It's something I think even they are aware of and are deeply insecure about, which is why they are constantly trying to find others that they feel they can act morally superior to. The urge within them to give preferential treatment to wome…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/15 02:07 AM
2

But drinking haterade isn't a good way to build companionship. Who/what exactly are you trying to address here?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/15 06:01 PM
1

But if you have great options, doesn't it make sense that eventually you will choose one? You clearly aren't a guy. So don't even try to pretend that you know what they want.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/15 05:51 PM
2

Because it maintains a stable, growing, happy society. Correction: it used to. Marriage isn't the same anymore.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/15 05:49 PM
2

Humans crave companionship. Sure. But they don't need marriage to have that.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/15 05:47 PM
2

No it isn't. Yes it is. Just because a lot of examples of it are devoid of context and tone because you're reading it on the internet, and a lot of autists fail miserably when attempting it doesn't change that it really is just a word for playful teasing. And posting a link some random blogger is not convincing anyone of anything. He's not an authoritative source on the term. If you can't see the problem with dread game, I'm not going to bother explaining. Translation: I can't explain it. It's o…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/15 10:03 PM
1

Negging is manipulative. Dread game is manipulative. Negging = playful teasing. Dread game = reminding someone you have options and that you'll leave if they don't behave. I'm not going to try to argue that TRP isn't "manipulative", but you gave some terrible examples. Both of those have harmful side effect to the victim (lower self-esteem, greater insecurity) People like you obviously don't give a rat's ass about how happy these people are or if they are ever get laid, so I don't see how you ca…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/15 09:14 PM
3

The issue is that TRP teaches you to treat every woman like she will actively destroy your life given the slightest of chances, so therefore you must take extreme measures as a man to control yourself and her in the relationship so that it never gets to that point. It's this premise that I, and many other dissenters have so much issue with. Well I don't know about you, specifically, but a lot of the people who hate the RP seem to have no problem with that kind of attitude when it comes to treati…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/15 09:06 PM
8

What do you define as rape that has you convinced only so few women do it then?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/15 04:53 PM
8

Can you answer the first question though? Specifically I want to know why you're so sure that only 1% of rapes are female on male, if your definition includes intoxication removing consent.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/15 04:40 PM
1

Why so little emphasize on reporting and prosecuting all of the perpetrators of the rape epidemic? Isn't jailing them the best prevention? Because lying to the police is actually a crime, with an actual punishment, unlike lying about rape to anyone else. So of course there are going to be millions of excuses why rape "victims" don't need to report what happened.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/15 04:24 PM
6

Women hardly ever rape men. There would be a handful of cases. It would not even be 1% of the number of cases of men raping women. Not even close. How would you know? And why do you think that is even relevant to the question?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/15 04:19 PM
1

What makes you think anyone gives a damn about your life choices? You're not as important as you seem to think you are.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/15 09:53 PM
3

I didn't say anything about that. Stop trying to change the subject. I simply asked what makes you think child support is part of our biology. Are you going to actually explain what you meant, or admit you made a mistake with that statement, or just continue to make a fool of yourself?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/15 02:44 PM
3

So you can't answer the question?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/15 02:10 PM
9

What part of biology dictates what's fair?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/15 07:52 AM
9

I have empathy for people in tremendously difficult circumstances and am not going to judge people whose shoes I have not walked in. Then maybe try doing that for men some time.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/15 07:51 AM
7

So you think all abortion is wrong?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/15 07:28 AM
12

Can you tell me what part of "the biology of reproduction" dictates that men must share their resources with whoever they happen to impregnate, intentionally or not?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/15 07:25 AM
5

An option to opt into parenthood as opposed to making them opt out is actually the only feasible way LPS would work. Otherwise plenty of women could just "forget" to notify the father. what woman is going to want to fuck a man who wants her to sign something like that? I sure wouldn't. Good. I wouldn't want to fuck a woman like you either. So maybe you should consider that type of contract a good thing if it helps keep you away from people you don't like.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/15 07:22 AM
10

You seem to hate the law without actually understanding what it's designed to protect, the child. That's a crock of shit. That's just the rationale that people accept to justify the law. Reality is that it's the law because there's lots of money to made for a lot of people. If the best interests of the child were actually top priority, you'd think there would at least be mandatory oversight on how child support money is spent.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/15 07:18 AM
9

"callous disregard for the life of another human being" is more present when a man who knowingly engages in unprotected sex abandons a child because he's too selfish to take responsibility. So when a woman has unprotected sex, then has an abortion or gives the child up for adoption, do you have the same opinion?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/15 07:13 AM
2

I really hate when people say this. You might as well say there should be no wars, and everyone should be happy, and everyone gets what they want for christmas. Nobody is really going to argue those things but you are completely ignoring reality, and that is that people are always bound to fight over things like who gets exactly what they want, since people want different things, or they want the same things that not everyone can possibly have. It's easy to say that you don't want to fight. Nobo…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/15 12:46 AM
5

I am an MRA. No you're not. You know how I know? This is already the second time you've needlessly stated that when no has already accused you of not being one. You're an idiot. I'm just saying old men because law makers for the most part are old men. And these old men universally don't support men's right to choose.
/r/MensRights07/12/15 03:29 AM
1

He is saying that men wouldn't allow women to tell them how to control their own bodies. Uh, they do. Men let women tell them they have to work to support kids they don't want. Essentially saying how men tell women if they can have abortions or not. Women tell other women too, you know. It's not just men.
/r/MensRights07/12/15 03:26 AM
4

Does that really happen that much? The only time I ever see anyone upset with someone who won't have children is when it's close family members.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/15 03:37 AM
14

Why are you talking about cases that go to court like that's the only thing that matters? Feminists are working hard to make it easier to get men kicked out of college or fired from their job when someone accuses them of rape. Changing how the criminal justice system works is a lot harder but they've been working on that too with rape shield laws for instance. Point is that there are people out there that clearly want to make things easier for false accusers, and that alone should be enough for …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/15 03:33 AM
2

I never understand why TRPers and MRAs have such an issue with women only shelters. You're right, the civil rights act is stupid. Everyone should get to ban birth groups they don't like from anywhere they want all because they're afraid of them.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/15 01:11 PM
2

In the past several OPs I literally list that most of my volunteer work and mentoring is centered around men. Yes, I saw that. Sounds like it's related to something you're deeply insecure about if you feel the need to gloat about it on the internet so much though, more than it shows how much you give a shit about men. Especially when you throw it in with all the other things that you say.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/15 01:09 PM
1

Science is just a label they trot around because they think it will help lend credibility to whatever they apply it to. They will say anything like is "science" even if it's not even close to using the scientific method.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/15 03:28 AM
10

I think this post actually helps illustrate the real reason, which is that people just have no compassion for men. Observe as this specimen makes up some bullshit reason out of the air about how it's men's own fault that others are less willing to help them in times of need. "Men are less likely to help around the house, so they deserve it! I don't need proof or even partial evidence to lead me to think this."
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/15 03:21 AM
1

no crazy ex-lover stalking me and punching me in the face Do you really need that though? Just say you do. I don't think you have to prove it. I thought the whole thing about the DV industry being about helping battered women was just a front so people would be less outraged about the government outright giving women more free shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/15 03:15 AM
1

Being grossed out by sluts is not a belief, it's an opinion. Since when does anyone have to rationally justify their dating preferences?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/15 12:29 AM
6

At best they're annoying. Even if they don't impact your life, you're better off staying away from them. Anyone who thinks men are oppressing women have done so throughout all of history is likely to have a negative view of men in general.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/15 12:26 AM
9

false accusations are nowhere near as rampant as the frequency actual rape crimes What the fuck does that have to do with due process? Stop trying to change the subject. Even if your claim was true (it's almost certainly not), it's irrelevant to the problem of men being found guilty without sufficient evidence.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/15 12:20 AM
1

ALL single mothers need to be hated regardless of the circumstances? Well the title is "why you should hate single mothers of boys". So already that's not "all" single mothers that this guy said everyone should hate. So am I supposed to believe that you actually read through this guy's post and completely understood his argument after that? Ha. Anyway I'm not going to bother reading it if you didn't either. But I think I can explain the hatred for at least some single mothers. It's for the ones …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/15 12:12 AM
2

What is it with you people and changing definitions of normal words? That's rich coming from a feminist.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/15 11:54 PM
1

I do actually see no good reason for segregation by gender when it comes to bathrooms. But of course I'm not against those other things though. You're being obtuse by pretending I meant segregation in any possible way that word can be defined, and ignoring the context I used it in. That's not a constructive thing to do.
/r/MensRights24/11/15 03:30 AM
3

Alcohol does often prevent resistance. True. But that is different from any amount always preventing resistance like the other poster claimed. It is also pretty obvious when someone consumed alcohol. Not always.
/r/MensRights24/11/15 01:54 AM
5

If that's how you interpreted it, why are you jumping to conclusions about it then? Anyway it does specify that the substance has to prevent the victim from resisting. That's the measure that's given. Having any amount of an intoxicating substance does not have that effect on everyone. You even said yourself that if what you believe counts as rape under the law was true, that means billions of rapes happen all the time. Why do you choose to believe something so absurd?
/r/MensRights24/11/15 01:53 AM
1

Segregation is wrong. Period. To say otherwise means you're against everything the black civil rights movement in America stood for and has accomplished.
/r/MensRights23/11/15 11:54 PM
3

Did you read it? Because this is the part about intoxication: (3) Where a person is prevented from resisting by any intoxicating or anesthetic substance, or any controlled substance, and this condition was known, or reasonably should have been known by the accused. That's not even close to what you said. The substance has to prevent them from resisting, AND it has to be obvious. It does not say anything about drugs automatically taking away the ability to consent.
/r/MensRights23/11/15 11:37 PM
3

What law exactly do you think you're talking about? Because what you just said is not actually true.
/r/MensRights23/11/15 11:16 PM
3

Lol where do you think all those stupid buzzwords came from?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/15 02:34 AM
0

Are there any news sites that you know of that you would consider to be pro-male that you think are more comparable?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/15 02:30 AM
2

Um, I believe this question was addressed to "redpillers". That is seriously the first word in the title. How could you miss that? Regardless, your answer is terrible and makes it obvious you're a feminist anyway in case it wasn't already because it's clear you're just focused on trying to paint feminism in a positive light, instead of actually answering what would definitively distinguish someone as a feminist. So let me illustrate that by asking you a question. Say we have a woman that has all…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/15 02:26 AM
3

You seem to be very confused. Meritocracy is the ideal, yes. So that is what people bring up every time someone decides to say "we should hire more women because vagina". Hiring and promoting people based on their merits is the goal over doing it over what's in their pants. I think most people agree. Obviously, if men prefer helping out other men over women, even without consciously intending to do so, that is not a meritocracy. So what should be happening is that sort of behavior being discoura…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/15 02:00 AM
1

Feminists crying about under-representation of women in whatever industry is like spoiled Americans complaining about immigrants taking their jobs. They want all the pay and prestige without doing any of the dirty work to compete to get what they want. They especially wouldn't want any of the accountability that comes with any of the responsibility they'll get in upper management positions. Yes, sometimes stuff like prejudices and nepotism come into play that happens to discriminate against some…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/15 01:43 AM
4

We need women in those positions. Full stop. Anything less is unacceptable. Why? If you think more "women in power" will somehow automatically end up being a net benefit for women all over, you're likely mistaken. Female judges and cops are proven to be harsher on women than men in those positions are, as an example.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/15 06:15 AM
1

IMO it was never really needed. Once it was shown that some were willing to stoop to that level, that's all that had pointed to once someone else tried the same thing. Reddit already tells you when posts have been edited too.
/r/MensRights14/11/15 11:49 PM
8

OP is talking about male circumcision you know.
/r/MensRights14/11/15 11:44 PM
14

Just happens to be that internet feminists are a lot more interested in moderating those kinds of subs so they can control the conversation. I don't really think it says much about women in general.
/r/MensRights14/11/15 11:40 PM
4

Apparently you do too since this post isn't attempting to change his view either.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/15 09:27 PM
2

it's crazy how douchey some guys come off on tinder Have you ever browsed female profiles?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/15 10:52 PM
1

women rate most men as below average Nitpick, but it annoys me when people say that about that okcupid blog. What it actually said was that women rate most men about 2/5 stars or below, not "below average". That's completely different, as the way you phrased it doesn't even make any sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/15 10:51 PM
1

This is akin to me lamenting that men are the gatekeepers of commitment. Isn't that phrase just supposed to be a way of saying that men's standards for sex are usually much lower than women's?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/15 10:31 PM
3

Free speech does not mean speech without consequences. As long as the government isn't involved, your free speech is alive and well. You're talking about the first amendment of the US constitution. The general concept of free speech is an ideal that encompasses a lot more than that. The point is that there are people who think all forms of public censorship are bad, even if it doesn't come from the government. I'm so sick of you people repeating this crap everywhere even though it's completely i…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/15 02:08 AM
1

wrong https://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/3rpylj/cmv_all_men_should_be_taught_the_theory_of/cwr91oq
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/15 11:43 PM
2

what makes false rape accusations so special What makes rape so special?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/15 11:33 PM
3

you're no more likely to be falsely accused of rape as you are of other crimes WRONG! Why do people keep saying this crap? The “unfounded” rate, or percentage of complaints determined through investigation to be false, is higher for forcible rape than for any other Index crime. Eight percent of forcible rape complaints in 1996 were “unfounded,” while the average for all Index crimes was 2 percent. And this is only measuring police reports.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/15 11:31 PM
4

"Anyone who disagrees with me should die!" ...but they're the edgy one here. Okay.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/15 08:01 AM
1

It's always hilarious when feminist clowns point at cases of high status men getting lenient punishments and try to use that shit as an example of male privilege or whatever. Fact: men are disproportionately locked up and given longer sentences. You making desperate attempts to find counterexamples involving athletes that already have a lot of respect in their communities doesn't change that.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/15 07:55 AM
3

if you want to appeal to women Men do not just want to learn to appeal to women, any woman, they want to learn how to appeal to women that they find attractive. So your average dumpy female internet poster is not going to have much useful to say, even if she was able to accurately articulate what she finds attractive in a man (which would be unlikely anyway), because hardly anyone gives a shit what she likes since they're not trying to seduce her. Just like if a woman goes to somewhere like r/as…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/15 08:33 AM
2

they are right to fire you You're only saying this because you're thinking of an employer that shares your opinions. If someone fired you because they actually considered the kind of shit YOU say to be hate speech, and wanted to distance themselves from it, you would not be saying the same thing. Would you?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/15 08:13 AM
6

feminism is actually highly respected Yes, why are you saying this as if it contradicts anything the OP said? He is literally saying that feminists generally get what they ask for. Sidenote: I find it funny how often people go from saying that feminists are underdogs fighting the status quo to trying to say that anyone who is against has an unpopular opinion.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/15 12:49 AM
1

I don't really think that's exactly the appropriate term. I think a phyrrhic victory is meant to describe a situation where the winner has sacrificed too much to get the results they wanted. Feminists have hardly had to struggle at all to get what they want, they are just too short sighted to see the unintended negative consequences of their actions.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/15 12:44 AM
3

I have literally never once heard a female friend or acquaintance gush over a man's income. Well, duh. I wouldn't expect many to. Women know there is a stigma around being perceived as a gold digger. I personally don't really care at all how much money a guy makes as long as he can support himself You and every other woman on the planet has at least that bare minimum standard. But here's the thing, men do not always have that expectation in women. Lots of men don't mind supporting their partner …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/15 01:22 AM
1

while men don't necessarily hate on women like Kim K and Nikki Minaj but they can almost certainly be said not to respect them...Am I wrong for thinking that? I think maybe some men might not "respect" anyone who they think became successful off of primarily their sex appeal, if that's what you're asking. But that doesn't have anything to do with them specifically being women. Then a lot of women seem like to irrational interpret any kind of sexual interest as a lack of respect for all her other…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/15 12:54 AM
1

Why do so many people hate those girls and angrily talk about the way they flaunt sex Two words: pussy cartel. Are you familiar with that idea? It's mostly other women that hate on these women. You can reject that explanation, but don't pretend that there is none when you can't even come up with a different one. men are more or less given a free pass to talk about all the women they've had sex with and are indeed glorified for doing so That's complete crap. Men are given crap for "objectifying" …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/15 09:23 AM
1

if more women refused to date promiscuous men How would women doing something else change whether or not a man is hypocritical? I think we both have a different understanding of the term. Hypocrisy is defined as "the behavior of people who do things that they tell other people not to do : behavior that does not agree with what someone claims to believe or feel". So, if a man says he thinks it's wrong or immoral for anyone to sleep around, but sleeps around himself, then he's a hypocrite. BUT, if…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/15 03:49 AM
1

I think you're confused. TRP is simply a forum where people gather to discuss topics and say things that would be considered taboo in most other other places. While there are several premises that most participants accept and founders teach, I don't think that hating minorities is one of them. Or even hating women, like you may have meant to say. While maybe you may be convinced of it, not everyone believes that "misogyny" is a fundamental tenet of the red pill world view. People saying mean thi…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/15 03:02 AM
1

Pretty sure all branches have "training" similar to this, but hardly anyone takes it seriously. I remember at the last SAPR briefing I went to, the whole auditorium started laughing at something the speaker said and she clearly got butthurt and told everyone to calm down.
/r/MensRights12/10/15 01:48 AM
13

Wearing jewelry while doing any kind of manual labor or working with machines is retarded so clearly this guy is not all there.
/r/MensRights12/10/15 01:43 AM
1

Feminism is a hate movement against men and only uses the slogan of being about gender equality to deflect criticism. If you pay any attention to what they advocate for, what they consider to be equality is completely backwards the vast majority of the time.
/r/MensRights12/10/15 01:39 AM
1

I like how whenever anyone jokes about fat people and the target happens to be a woman some dipshit always tries to claim it's really about hating women.
/r/MensRights12/10/15 01:35 AM
7

I've joked before that feminists were inspired by 1984 instead of seeing it as a dystopia like everyone else but this is just ridiculous.
/r/MensRights12/10/15 01:31 AM
1

I get the feeling you're only asking this because you see plenty of hypocrites that think it's totally justified for them to treat men as potential rapists, but when men do anything like that with women or even "generalize" them, they'll immediately call it sexism and hate. I don't take those people seriously, if that's what you're asking.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/15 08:26 AM
2

the type of culture that means that women can get away with rape after confessing to it at a public event I'd easily get on board with that term if that's almost exactly how it was defined. Because female on male rape is pretty much the only thing you can get anyone to openly be accepting of nowadays.
/r/MensRights21/09/15 09:06 AM
3

Why not have equal disdain for the men who have sex with women without condoms, knowing full well that pregnancy is an issue? If they had any say in if the woman they knocked up got an abortion, they would deserve equal disdain. But they don't. You're trying to tell everyone to hold men just as accountable for a decision they cannot make. That's bullshit. Even if you still want to argue that just the decision to have sex without protection makes the guy a bad person, well not only did the woman …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/15 09:43 PM
1

The point in the first place is to circumvent the whole justice system and get people punished for things they're accused of with much lower standards of evidence.
/r/MensRights17/09/15 05:22 AM
5

Do you believe men and women are more or less equal under the law? No, women are quite obviously above the law for the most part in terms of getting away with crimes they commit, and have several advantages written out clearly for them while men have none. Your friends know how privileged they are and think it's enough, and are scared that if they get too greedy and keep asking for more that men are gonna get pissed and do something nobody will like. So they settle on the claim that men and wome…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/15 08:30 PM
1

Then what exactly did you mean when you said "desire for sex is a rational act and not an innate one"? Are you retracting that statement now?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/15 11:58 PM
2

"desire for sex" is a rational act and not an innate one Just in humans? Or do you think that every being on the planet makes a conscious decision to attempt to reproduce? How do you people say shit like this and expect anyone to take you seriously?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/15 10:20 PM
9

It's pretty much just a popular term in feminist circles, used as a pejorative toward pretty much any man that they feel is too masculine.
/r/MensRights11/09/15 03:59 AM
1

Yes, but you'd essentially be asking them to spend money to spend time with you. Unless they were already planning on going out to eat, and didn't have plans with anyone else, or money is absolutely nothing to them, or they're just incredibly lonely and desperate because they get little attention from men, it's a bad idea to ask them to go out with you and pay for themselves because it's not an attractive option if they are indifferent about you and the venue. That's why you have to make it more…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/15 07:06 AM
2

No, the solution for men is to not even put themselves in that position in the first place. Don't take women out to dinner.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/15 03:04 AM
0

but they damn well know they better be showing up with some chicken wings and beer. Because they're not chipping in on the PPV bill...usually it's at least one or the other. But anyway that's more of a group dynamic that's different. If you want lots of people to come, you'll offer free stuff. If you don't care how many people come, but you just don't want moochers, you'll set the expectation that they at least BYOB or something. People who usually have trouble making friends do the former, peop…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/15 02:58 AM
3

You're right, asking anyone to a one on one dinner and expecting them to pay is rude. That's because that pretty much puts them in a position where they're obligated to order something. Saying to someone "hey come to this place with me and spend money" usually isn't very appealing unless they are already really into you or the place. But men who even do that are stupid. That's why guys should do stuff like take them to a free concert in the park, or invite them over to their place for drinks and…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/15 02:51 AM
1

Depends on the nature of your relationship with them and how bad you want to them to go usually. Say something like "hey I'm going to this place, you're invited if you want to come" usually makes it pretty easy for them to infer that they're probably going to have to pay for themselves if they want to tag along. If they're not clear, and they aren't willing to pay, they need to ask directly or say something like "I'm broke". If it's some place you want to specifically take them, or a place you d…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/15 02:40 AM
5

Well then that's something totally different you're talking about and has nothing to do with "objectification".
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/15 08:45 AM
5

It can be a horrible thing, if someone uses you. As what? Something that someone else likes to look at? The horror.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/15 03:55 AM
9

there are women objectifying that body type Sorry this is a bit off topic but I just have to lol at you using that word in this context. It's like, what is even the point of it if you're not saying it in attempt to shame men? I thought that was the point? But if you're just going to casually mention that it's something that women do too without hinting that it's a bad thing...doesn't it lose any negative connotation that it had? What makes "objectifying" someone ever a bad thing then? Why is it …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/15 03:36 AM
3

Sorry was this supposed to be news to anyone?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/15 03:29 AM
2

the thought that the female emancipation essentially leads to the destruction of society and the unhappiness of several men It's not "female emancipation" by itself that's the problem, it's the moral hazard that's created when anyone is given freedom without responsibility. People just naturally struggle to hold women to account for anything, create and enforce obligations for them, or expect them to be self-sufficient. So when they're then allowed to play adult and do whatever the fuck they wan…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/15 03:27 AM
1

And that means absolutely dick if the results aren't easy to reproduce. Because otherwise how do we know they're not just making shit up or doing something they're not telling us to get the results they want. Fuck, anyone can easily make their own "study" showing the exact opposite, where men's names get picked less often. All they would really even have to do is focus on occupations that are female dominated, like child care or working at a DV shelter. Nobody would even question the results bec…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/15 05:39 AM
1

Feminists get to decide all by themselves what equality means. Because they say so.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/15 02:51 AM
2

Oh yeah that's totally something blacks complain about, not spoiled snotty white people who are afraid of minorities. LOL you are just too funny.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/15 02:49 AM
1

Number one issue for blacks is how they are treated by police and our justice system. Well guess fucking what, it ain't women getting treated worse by that too, it's men. Blacks also have to fight against segregation which is another thing that women seem to be much more in favor of. You feminists embarrass yourselves every time you make that comparison because it either shows how totally ignorant you are or how hard you outright lie.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/15 02:46 AM
5

Feminists have to be pretentious to make their outright sexism less obvious to clueless people.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/15 02:40 AM
6

attacking feminism rather than advancing the rights and equal treatment of men Same thing
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/15 02:35 AM
2

Lol that's such a shit comparison because feminists are the ones constantly advocating for segregation with their "safe spaces" for women. They love to compare themselves to the civil rights movement but they're actually much more similar to white supremacists.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/15 02:31 AM
8

This submission quickly made it to the front page of r/all so feminists are coming in trying to do some damage control.
/r/MensRights20/08/15 08:58 AM
-4

Now we are having to bitch about things we don't care, mind or actually like just to try to make things even Speak for yourself, fuckface. I would definitely mind if some bitches I don't like did this shit to me. I especially mind in our current cultural climate of caring so much about "equality". Equality should mean treating people the same, PERIOD. Not just when it's convenient for certain people. Feminists cry about all sorts of stupid shit, and want to have men selectively punished for it. …
/r/MensRights20/08/15 08:56 AM
10

we call this a symptom of toxic masculinity Stopped reading.
/r/MensRights20/08/15 01:27 AM
36

Because having any kind of opinion about women nowadays is considered misogyny.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/15 09:34 PM
2

I'd be more impressed if I saw a woman take out the garbage tbh. Never seen a woman do that.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/15 07:35 PM
2

I'd pick the waitress every time. The astronaut is going to think a lot more highly of herself, and expect more from me, but her job title and accomplishments do not make her one bit more attractive to me. That's even assuming we lived in some fantasy land where I had equal to higher status, which is the only realistic scenario she would even be into me in the first place.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/15 07:28 PM
5

I personally did not propose anything, I was just trying to help you understand their argument better. I think what they mainly advocate though is shaming promiscuity and encouraging women to marry early. That's so they don't do things like sleep around in the twenties, and then wonder why they can't settle down in their thirties as a single mom to provide an ideal environment for themselves and their kid.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/15 08:29 AM
1

Ah I saw that that little discussion over in r/mensrights earlier but didn't comment because I was on my phone and hate typing more than a few sentences on it. Anyway, I believe she only said what she did because she's married and hasn't been dating for a while. In her youth she probably could have easily gotten away with that, but now that she's middle aged with kids I'm pretty sure she would quickly change her attitude if she ever put herself on the market. One is not necessarily a hypocrite f…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/15 08:21 AM
2

Since day one, marriage has been AMORAL. It doesn't care about doing the right thing. All it cares about is how to procure stability and resources. This is actually very true. Things weren't always entirely fair for both parties but they did both benefit in their own ways, and most importantly, it worked and got shit done like having children raised in a stable environment. We no longer validate males feeeeeeelings. As long as he services my bank account, I don't care if he's cuddling or slittin…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/15 08:00 AM
6

not the same with limiting their freedom when they're adults Ah, but why would limit their freedoms ever! That's so wrong! You're taking away their happiness! I don't think parents are capable of forcing their kids to do things they don't want to when they're adults . No, but the government is. They do that all the time.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/15 07:56 AM
2

Is that the attitude you'll have with your children?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/15 07:49 AM
5

Yes, just like men being skilled in something like D&D isn't well regarded, because it's not something that's useful to women.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/15 07:48 AM
5

I don't believe that men (or anyone) should be treated as disposable and manipulated into sacrificing their personal freedom and happiness for the sake of society or civilization I don't think that's entire argument. I think they believe women's freedoms and short term happiness should be sacrificed not just for the good of society, but for their own good, and for their long term happiness.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/15 07:41 AM
4

Simply put, manipulation the word used when you get someone to do something that you want them to, instead of what they would most likely decide to do if they had all the same information as you. Now, one of the main reasons that a lot of people consider almost all of TRP to be manipulation is because they feel like they would not sleep anyone who went to a forum like that to learn how to get laid. You don't tell them that of course, and try to present yourself as naturally charming, so there's …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/15 07:31 AM
17

Manipulation Manipulated into what? Having sex with men? Oh, I guess women don't like sex then if every time a man does any convincing, it's considered "manipulation". Except that's ridiculous and sex does not hurt women. dread game Dread game as far as I'm aware of is when you remind a girl you have options. How does that hurt her? shaming What exactly are you referring to? Nobody is forcing women to go on their sub and read all the shit they talk if that's what you're talking about. rape advoc…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/15 09:51 PM
12

TRP on the other hand is actually hurting women. What the hell are you talking about?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/15 09:40 PM
8

How many times do we men suppress our natural instincts for sex and aggression just to get something better in the long run? How the hell does he say this, and then right after that it seems like he's talking about not caring about fairness or justice just for a better chance at getting laid. Seriously, wut? women get served first in restaurants Huh?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/15 09:38 PM
1

You provided one historical source that did not even fully support your position. Your others were related to biology. You provided the evidence of one juror's ruling as cited on a Wikipedia page. It had much more than that. Your reading comprehension is terrible. I'm not wasting my time on your dumb ass anymore. You can believe whatever you want, it's not important to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/15 12:17 AM
1

Google 'women cannot consent to sex' and there's 56,000,000 results LOL that means nothing. Google "lizard people are real" and you get 10 million. And BTW did you mean to write drunk women? http://www.wgac.colostate.edu/consent That doesn't even appear to be campus policy (which would still not be a law), just some kind of dumb PSA. https://share.cornell.edu/education-engagement/sex-alcohol-and-clear-consent/ Again what the hell makes you think universities have any say in what happens in crimi…
/r/MensRights11/08/15 11:49 PM
1

First of all that's not the actually penal code in California, this is: http://codes.lp.findlaw.com/cacode/PEN/3/1/9/1/s261 Exact wording of relevant part: (3) Where a person is prevented from resisting by any intoxicating or anesthetic substance, or any controlled substance, and this condition was known, or reasonably should have been known by the accused. Do you understand how that's not the same as an intoxicating substance being considered to automatically prevent someone from resisting? So …
/r/MensRights11/08/15 11:09 PM
6

DRUNK SEX IS NOT RAPE, NOT EVEN BY LAW. HOLY SHIT STOP SPREADING THIS MISINFORMATION Nothing in what you quoted in the criminal code said anything about intoxication voiding consent. And contract law is not criminal law. We don't throw people in jail just because they got someone to sign something while they were drunk.
/r/MensRights11/08/15 10:33 PM
1

Show me a law that says this then. Or some kind of court precedent.
/r/MensRights11/08/15 08:54 PM
1

According to the law, legally a woman is incapable of giving consent to anyone while she is drinking False. Your entire question is based on a faulty premise. It's a shame that so many people even on this sub fall for feminist lies and propaganda.
/r/MensRights11/08/15 07:52 PM
1

You seem to think that if you just throw enough words at me, you'll convince me that something didn't happen. But speculation is not a substitute for evidence.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/15 07:51 PM
3

If you think everything is rape then of course you're going to say society condones it just because they don't agree with your crazy stupid fucked up definition of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/15 03:35 AM
1

I'm not sure if I can do that at this point because by now it's clear I had something else in mind when I used the word normal than you did when you read it. Besides it doesn't seem like even more evidence will convince you of anything since like I already pointed out you don't appear to have any to support your position.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/15 03:33 AM
1

infer the average experience for the time Just to clear things up, I wasn't really trying to say what the average was. When I used the word "normal", I mostly just meant that it was generally socially acceptable, not that it was the most common thing that happened. I already tried to say that in this thread. Is that something you're arguing against as well?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/15 03:28 AM
12

The person who decided to keep it?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/15 06:37 AM
8

child support may be mandatory in a perfect world OMG! Why would you force someone to support a child they don't want?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/15 05:31 AM
11

They don't. Then why is child support mandatory. They expect men to participate in raising the children that they helped create. Yes, and some of those people have that same expectation for women too. So there, you answered your own question about abortion.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/15 02:40 AM
1

No, that is totally good advice. If you don't do everything exactly like in the video it is literally rape.
/r/MensRights10/08/15 02:38 AM
1

What does it feel like to have to completely ignore everything you don't accept all the time? Seriously I can't imagine the effort that would take. Literally two sentences after the quote you mentioned, it goes on to say As more land was won for cultivation, this trend changed. During the High and Late Middle Ages, women were increasingly married away in their teens, leading to higher birth rates.[39] While women would be married once they reached reproductive age Why did you even think that if …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/15 02:37 AM
1

Okay I'll just completely ignore everything in that Wikipedia article and take your word for all your unsourced claims.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/15 01:40 AM
14

Why do people force men to support kids that they don't want?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/15 01:28 AM
1

What are you talking about? Didn't we all learn so many good tips when they put out this video? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bVHYvUpeqKI Hahaha. How do these people pretend to take themselves seriously for even a second.
/r/MensRights09/08/15 10:45 PM
1

No, see, they're saying in mainstream porn all the scenes reenact rape. Because that's what men watch and really want to see.
/r/MensRights09/08/15 10:40 PM
1

I'm sure that's what you see on twitter I don't go on twitter. feminist work is written in English with relatively little jargon LOL you can't be serious. How stupid do you think I am? There's a lot of jargon but almost all of it is pretty meaningless. That is why a lot of people pick it up though, because they they can conveniently place it wherever they want in their arguments to help give the impression to other clueless people that they're more sophisticated than they really are. Basically /…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/15 10:36 PM
2

Feminists are the ones I see most lying about it to support their arguments.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/15 04:34 AM
1

Everyone is a potential threat. No need for a mental breakdown over it though. Just learn to protect yourself and mitigate risks.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/15 02:17 AM
3

Christ dude I don't know what to say if you're serious. You can't let women get to you like that man. They're not the center of the universe. Just fucking forget about them for a while and do you.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/15 02:11 AM
1

Go play some Snoop Dogg - Bitches ain't shit but hoes and tricks He sang the chorus but that was off a Dr. Dre album. By the way his new one is shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/15 01:53 AM
2

I'm going to have a hard time explaining all of this to my GP Why would you say that kind of stuff to your general practitioner?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/15 01:51 AM
5

It's not that stupid really. It's kind of like businesses giving out free samples of their product.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/15 01:04 AM
7

The fact that she'll give up the ass for Chad Thundercock isn't really a consolation to you. Yes it is, because it lets you know what will work to get you a higher probability of getting laid so you can emulate that.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/15 01:00 AM
49

I know you probably wrote this trying to piss people off, but I'm not sure if you realize a lot of girls do most of this kind of stuff anyway. This is the kind of stuff TRP prepares for, you're just being open about it. This guide to me just comes off as a strategy of how to bag a chump who's just stupid enough to fall for that shit but just valuable enough to be attractive. Good luck with finding one of those. Anyway since I'm not a chump, and wouldn't tolerate a lot of that shit, it's whatever…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/15 12:33 AM
29

0% focused on increasing self worth. Yeah, I was just about say this. If you want commitment from a guy, you have to inspire it. All these women think they're hot shit just because most dudes will try to fuck anything, so they think that if the guy doesn't want to commit to them, they must not want commitment at all. So when they are screening guys for that, they will just end up with the guys desperate enough to settle for anything, which they probably won't end up wanting anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/15 12:23 AM
1

Nobody wonders, at least without soon going to find out for themselves. It's just a lot of people don't like the kind of straight talk that goes on in there which is why they say so much shit about it. They'd rather have as many people in the dark as they can.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/15 10:52 PM
2

that made me a bad person? Yes because seeking mating privileges when they've decided your not worthy makes you bad. Liking a woman for anything they don't want to be liked for is bad. Making a woman uncomfortable for having to reject you is bad. You do things that they don't like, so you're a bad person. But they can't state it as clearly as that so they have to come up with a bunch of bullshit jargon like "nice guysTM" and "objectification".
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/15 10:26 PM
0

Being mean is a strategy that quite a few women employ. It's even a behavior common enough for it to have its own word in japanese. Not sure how effective it actually is but I will say it hasn't worked on me.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/15 10:20 PM
6

I also love how feminists are always crying about how women weren't allowed to have anything to do with the hard sciences and then make up ridiculous shit like that. How could she supposedly invent the first computer program when she was being oppressed!?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/15 05:59 PM
2

Why is it so typical for feminists to not know shit about history and believe whatever they just made up in their heads? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_consent#Traditional_attitudes
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/15 05:49 PM
2

"Enough time hasn't passed yet" isn't a good answer, and I was hoping you'd have something else aside from that because it's the only argument I've ever seen. How long is it supposed to take? It doesn't sufficiently explain why women born without any of the barriers you claimed existed still don't do the things men do. Why exactly has nothing changed yet after more than a few generations? Have you read my explanation yet? I feel as if you're only arguing what you are because you think that women…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/15 05:48 PM
1

Oh, nice way of avoiding my question. Just like how you dipped when you embarrassed yourself with your ignorance on the history of age of consent laws.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/15 08:11 AM
0

In order for anyone to be productive like that, they usually need strong incentive. Like having a shit life and no one caring about them unless they do something for others. That's been the main thing that drives the progress of civilization, men at the bottom of society working hard and risking their lives just for a chance at a piece of the pie. If your life is pretty good and you're given most of what you want already, what need is there to do shit for anyone else? That's what women's lives a…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/15 06:34 AM
1

Black women are generally less desirable than white wimmen. That's a statement of observation, not a normative statement by the way, in case you were tryin to interpret it as such. It's something that I think a lot of RPers would willingly acknowledge and talk about. Black women are easier. If you want to say that even the mere discussion of that topic is racist, it's up to you. Of course what the dude in the thread you referenced said though was fucktarded.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/15 06:26 AM
4

It doesn't seem clear. It just seems to say that discrimination is okay along the lines of sex so long as it's shared housing. It would hardly make sense if they weren't allowed to charge more to one sex but were permitted to outright refuse to rent to them at all. But I dunno, that's just my guess.
/r/MensRights06/08/15 11:17 AM
7

Why the fuck does anyone still give a shit about SRS, if you're paying attention it's pretty obvious almost all the regular users moved to SRD. So even if the admins finally ban SRS, nothing will change because they've already migrated to a different sub that does the same thing but has yet to establish such a sitewide stigma. Although the way they haven't been banned yet even though they seem to fit the criteria for a community that exists "solely to annoy other redditors" perfectly should make…
/r/MensRights06/08/15 09:49 AM
-7

OP didn't read far enough. These kinds of ads are still allowed. Shared Housing Exemption -- If you are advertising a shared housing unit, in which tenants will be sharing a bathroom, kitchen, or other common area, you may express a preference based upon sex only. http://www.craigslist.org/about/FHA
/r/MensRights06/08/15 09:31 AM
1

As long as they're not fat, don't have an aggressive/masculine personality, and don't have a horrible hairstyle, which are all traits that are typical in American black women, then they will not struggle with dating that bad. Yes, generally lighter is skin preferred, but dark skin alone is not preventing any woman from finding a man to commit to her, they're just looking for excuses if they think that.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/15 09:11 AM
1

Why is it trollish behavior for this woman to call herself a Blue Pill Strong Independent Feminist Woman Social Justice Warrior? Well first of all when you call yourself strong and independent on the internet, and reddit especially, a lot of people are going to be reminded of this overused internet joke, so they'll probably think you're joking too. And the term "social justice warrior" is a pejorative. You're not supposed to call yourself that, even if you can admit that you fit the stereotype. …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/15 09:03 AM
2

"Why is there no White Entertainment Television?" It's called CMT
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/15 05:19 AM
0

The bias of the courts reflects the bias of the overall population. Whatever, it was just a suggestion because you asked me what I would do, and that's what I came up with on the spot. I don't really have a problem with the basics of our justice system, I just don't particularly agree with all of our current laws.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/15 05:11 AM
5

You asked for a patriarchal institution I never uttered those words even once. My comment was in reply to someone saying something about how "men are advocated for and taken care of by the entire traditionalist system", and I guess I had an entirely different idea of what he meant by that than you did. Whatever, that's not important. But those movies are so poorly done most of the time, compared to films targeted to a male audience. Look at the budget for Twilight and compare that to your regula…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/15 04:53 AM
0

The way all criminal matters are settled? You take them to court with evidence of some wrongdoing, and get them convicted if you have enough. Otherwise they can do what they want if they have the approval of the parents as well too I guess.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/15 11:12 PM
0

I really don't think procreation with pubescent children is something we need to be encouraging I didn't say we should. All I did was explain why I think it's discouraged now. in situations where both parties are under that age (or within 2 years of each other), no fault should be assigned So after all that shit you just said about how teenagers are unfit for sex and not mature enough to make good decisions and whatever, you still say this. So what is your argument that two underage kids shouldn…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/15 10:01 PM
5

Women are good at this. Women are good at having their complaints acknowledged and taken seriously, but that's not something that requires any skill on their part. Like the way a crying child will get a lot more assistance and support than a crying adult male. Women can whine about the stupidest shit and still have others listen, that's why they do it more.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/15 09:09 PM
8

to them, men are advocated for and taken care of by the entire traditionalist system And if they really thought that, then they'd be able to point to some concrete examples of this. But they can't. Where are all these patriarchal institutions that overshadow all those women's organizations? I know it's good to generally assume that people who disagree with you are still being rational and fair, but there needs to be a line drawn somewhere where they lose the benefit of the doubt. Feminists have …
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/15 08:59 PM
3

People attack TRP because it conflicts with their own interests, it's that simple. It's a subreddit where men talk about how to get what they want out of life without giving a shit about what overly selfish women want or their feelings. Of course they're going to bitch and moan.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/15 07:50 PM
5

I mean really posters like pornography_save_li and demonspawn routinely come into /r/MensRights and tell MRA just god awful a job we're doing then fuck off back to their rp hug box. Lol, just lol. Those guys have been posting to r/mensrights and have considered themselves MRAs for way longer than you have and before the red pill subreddit was even set up. I don't think you could have picked worse examples to try and make the point you wanted to. They just don't like the direction new posters lik…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/15 04:55 PM
0

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_consent#Traditional_attitudes Here's a start. According to that, modern attitudes about child sexual abuse didn't start til about the 19th century in christian societies, and generally cultures throughout history allowed marriage at around the start of puberty. But tell me exactly how you think everyone kept precise records of dates of birth and strictly enforced age of consent laws throughout all of history. I'd love to hear that.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/15 04:48 PM
1

Then explain why men fucking and even marrying 12 years was normal not that long ago. the ~ freedom ~ to fuck your 12 year old daughter Ah, so I see you want to try to conflate what I'm talking about with incest to try and support your point.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/15 07:58 AM
1

Right, that's why most people tell little boys they're lucky when an older woman fucks them.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/15 07:55 AM
1

She can't even keep a straight face.
/r/MensRights04/08/15 07:38 PM
1

I think people are more upset about how statutory rape is a strict liability crime. Most people on reddit seem to agree that lying to get laid is immoral (and of course even some crazy feminists think sometimes it should be considered "rape by deception"), so to see someone do that and have the only the other party be punished as a result of their lie just comes across as totally unjust. As for my opinion on age of consent laws in general, it just seems like a way jealous older women want to try…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/15 07:22 PM
13

Female equivalent is selfish entitled women demanding that men accept them for the way they are. Like fat acceptance and telling men that they're misogynists for preferring women who shave their legs and pubes. Plus women can just take whatever they want from men anyway, and even get help from the government. They don't have to do anything that men want. Women raping men is effectively legal, the only time they don't get away with it is if they do it to a little boy. Reproductive fraud doesn't g…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/15 11:46 AM
1

You can think that. But then you have to explain why they are the majority of posters on an open debate sub.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/15 03:24 AM
1

This sub is almost universally RPers and until there is equal and unbiased representation of ideas, it's not worth the effort to uphold a side that has no supporters here. Lol so you are unwilling to defend your views if you feel like you hold a minority opinion and have few people to back you up? That's pretty pathetic. Maybe consider that your positions are just weak and indefensible. Maybe that's why every feminist board is so ban happy.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/15 02:36 AM
5

Women want to work in a STEM environment because they are interested in STEM and have ambitions to contribute to the STEM knowledge base. Also they care about earning money and doing a good job. Are you sure it's not you that's living in fantasy land? At least RPers are trying to explain something that actually happens, which is that relatively few women are in STEM. They may be wrong about the reasons, but at least there's something to back their statements. You on the other hand are just sayin…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/15 02:26 AM
1

It was Paul Elam and his "Fuck Their Shit Up" approch to the gender equality debate that has gotten the MHRM the attention it now has. Ha. No. Maybe his over the top articles got a few more feminists to directly address the things he said, but I don't think he's solely or even close to being primarily responsible for how well known the MRM is nowadays. Really I just think the popularity of internet forums is responsible, since it's much more difficult for feminists to censor the things people sa…
/r/MensRights02/08/15 05:19 PM
4

No, they just think that any kind of harm is worse when done to a female, they just don't want to directly admit it.
/r/MensRights30/07/15 07:52 PM
2

accepting that women are equal to men How is this the top comment when almost every other comment is this thread is along the lines of "men and women are different"?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/15 12:33 AM
8

Well if feminism really wanted equality, I'm pretty sure women would be pretty hurt by things like being arrested more often and serving longer prison sentences, getting fucked in family court more, dying on the job more, etc. That's if feminists really wanted equality though, which we all know they don't. Instead they want gender supremacy, which clearly is making men resent women and withdraw the things they provide for them. So that's how feminism is hurting women, to answer you question.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/15 12:22 AM
11

Sexism is harmful, and feminism is the movement to end sexism. The problem is that feminists don't get to decide all by themselves what is sexist and what is harmful. Especially when you get the assholes who go around saying that sexism is prejudice plus power.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/15 12:11 AM
7

have a woman make male feminists look like an idiot That guy made himself look like an idiot all by himself. He also embodies so many of the negative stereotypes of male feminists. It's almost too perfect.
/r/MensRights27/07/15 03:13 AM
2

You'd be irritated because you know they're coming here in bad faith and/or are just completely ignorant on the topic but want to arrogantly feign knowledge of it anyway. They're irritated because they know they can't answer the question in any way that makes sense. But anyway I'm not bothered at all when feminists come here and attempt to start a topic like that. I enjoy it. It's so clear that they're coming in with this attitude of smug self-satisfaction about how they're going to "own" a bunc…
/r/MensRights27/07/15 02:53 AM
1

Because not starting a family is clearly going to be the more appealing option for men these days. So men talking about stuff like that is a threat to all the women who want men to marry them and provide for them.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/15 08:16 PM
3

Because men aren't allowed to have standards. It's also the reason for shit like fat acceptance, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/15 07:54 PM
1

I agree with a lot of stuff that is pro-feminist Why?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/15 07:52 PM
1

those are acquaintances Yeah, that's what I suspected you were trying to say with your first comment. Since it wasn't really obvious though that's probably why a lot of people disagreed with you. Personally, I don't really have a friend like that, but I can see it being possible if the two enjoy each others company and they both have enough respect for the other guy and the relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/15 07:48 PM
1

Friend's girlfriends
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/15 07:40 PM
2

She didn't, she just reported it the school and she still lost. Drunk sex is not a crime in any real court of law.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/15 01:28 AM
3

He didn't say most people, he said most people on reddit (which is still questionable). Besides, the people with the most power and resources can do what they want without caring about the opinions of the majority.
/r/MensRights12/07/15 12:48 AM
4

I find it amusing how many people are fooled by this. Drunk sex isn't rape just because a poster said so.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/15 12:40 AM
4

I think it's largely about image and what's more important to them. The MRAs who attack TRP want to distance themselves from them and the harsh language they use, because they don't see it as helpful to having their message appeal to as broad of an audience as possible. RPers who attack MRAs don't want to be perceived as useless weak whiners which would hinder their ability to attract women and get laid. Some also think MRAs are completely wasting their time.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/15 12:36 AM
11

Are we so afraid of contrary opinions that we can't read them? If they have something valid to say, we should listen - and hope that the reverse will happen, too. I think that was the point of this submission. It's to encourage everyone here to join the conversation that they were attempting to keep mostly to themselves in a three day old thread. They don't want to have real a discussion though because they're cowards. That's why they go run and hide in their own subreddit to talk about stuff th…
/r/MensRights02/07/15 05:26 PM
8

and women were truly oppressed THEY NEVER WERE. At least pay attention to what I write if you want to respond to me. How often do men actually get out on the streets and protest? In the name of the interests of other men? Not very often because 1) men do not have an innate in-group bias like women do, and 2) you just get what happened with the Warren Farrel talks.
/r/MensRights27/06/15 02:20 AM
5

What the fuck? Did you read anything I wrote at all? But that doesn't mean they haven't learned a thing or two about how to get their voices heard. Yes, all they do is shout that they're women and they're victims. That's it. Do you honestly think that is going to work for men?
/r/MensRights27/06/15 02:07 AM
2

Also not pro sex workers
/r/MensRights27/06/15 02:00 AM
14

On the other hand, feminism has endured for 60+ years. Why? Because they're good at it. They've built up institutional expertise in a lot of areas and they can put that towards issues they care about. Pfft. You're clueless. I don't understand how anyone can buy that history was just this long stretch of women's oppression until suddenly about a century ago, women got so much of what they wanted with hardly any resistance from men. Most real revolutions have significant body counts for fuck's sak…
/r/MensRights27/06/15 01:59 AM
1

Yes, I know what I'm doing. Do you really? What do you think is the difference between feminists and MRAs?
/r/MensRights27/06/15 01:48 AM
6

http://honeybadgerbrigade.com/the-team/
/r/MensRights27/06/15 01:34 AM
2

What the hell even compelled you to compare the two terms? Seems totally random.
/r/MensRights27/06/15 01:28 AM
1

I've seen worse.
/r/MensRights27/06/15 01:25 AM
50

They just like to imagine themselves being sexually desirable no matter what.
/r/MensRights27/06/15 01:21 AM
-6

I'm surprised more feminists don't openly despise gay men, they seem like the ultimate woman haters.
/r/MensRights27/06/15 01:20 AM
1

Sex with a porn star I guess?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/15 08:09 AM
0

People don't want to go to a place where they're going to be regularly downvoted or even ganged upon I have no problem with doing that as long as I know they're not going to delete my posts and ban me, so I won't be completely wasting my time. I've been banned from almost every gender related sub you can think of though. The only reason people wouldn't want to do that is if they weren't confident in their positions. I think it's pretty obvious that's the case with them.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/15 08:04 AM
2

I disagree with your assessment of r/femradebates. I don't go there much, but it still seems to be mostly full MRA leaning peeps in there, even though from the very beginning it's been obvious that it was set up to cater more toward feminists. That's actually the point of the board, because feminists generally don't like to debate unless they have control over the platform and frame in some way. They're all free to come into r/mensrights and argue with us all they want, but they don't do it that…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/15 08:00 AM
1

I'd be interested in seeing some research on the topic.
/r/MensRights19/06/15 03:58 AM
4

Feminists aren't interested in an honest debate...anywhere. They know they're full of shit. They will just censor you if they can, and attempt a character assassination when they can't.
/r/MensRights19/06/15 03:57 AM
2

But when are we going to be able kill children in video games? Just kidding, but I think it's kind of weird that even developers who allow you to kill women, still go out of their way to make sure you can't harm kids. I mean the natural revulsion towards both acts in the general public seems pretty similar.
/r/MensRights19/06/15 03:53 AM
23

I'll be a gentleman as soon as you start acting like a lady. And part of acting like a lady is not making unreasonable demands to complete strangers.
/r/MensRights19/06/15 03:46 AM
5

Not that hard to believe if they count stuff like "verbal abuse" as part of the definition of DV. Which is likely.
/r/MensRights19/06/15 03:43 AM
5

I know what you meant man, I just thought it was a funny mental image to think of him doing a set of curls while talking to the woman.
/r/MensRights19/06/15 03:39 AM
7

For anyone reading this thinking that statement is a complete fabrication, it's not that far off the mark actually. When feminists make claims about how so many rapists get away with their crimes, they are basing them on the assumption that every rape accusation, even the ones not reported to the police and simply a survey, must be true. How can anyone genuinely believe that without thinking that all men must be rapists anyway?
/r/MensRights19/06/15 03:31 AM
8

He needs to lift On camera?
/r/MensRights19/06/15 03:08 AM
4

What's so wrong with asking men to NOT take up large amounts of space and instead allow other people to sit down? The part where you're not asking the same of women.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/15 12:19 PM
5

Yeah, and if I thought you were freezing, and threw a pot of boiling water on you in attempt to "help" you, would it really matter if I truly believed that or not? Either I'd be sent to prison or a mental institution. There comes a point where if one's perceptions are so far removed from reality, it hardly matters how much they claim to have good intentions. Something needs to be done about them.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/15 12:06 PM
11

That is, there are countless rights violations, harms, and injustices that can be done to people and could be done to men more than women. How would that disprove feminism? It makes you question how feminists can assert with such confidence that women in general have it "worse" than men (which is how they attempt to justify prioritizing women's interests, and the very label of feminism), when people can come up with a list of female privilege, that's just as long, if not longer, than any list of…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/15 11:49 AM
1

I'm against gay marriage. I am also against straight marriage.
/r/MensRights04/06/15 07:17 AM
-1

Journalism about current events? Totally, you're right, it's not trivial. Journalism about video games? I really don't give a shit, even as someone that plays them. I play them, not read articles about them.
/r/MensRights26/05/15 11:27 PM
-4

Right, which is fucking stupid and trivial as shit anyway. Even serious gamers have no good reason to care about fucking game reviews, especially nowadays with pirating so rampant. People need to make up their own god damned minds if they like a game or not, and not rely on others to tell them if it's good.
/r/MensRights26/05/15 11:14 PM
3

Instead they should do things that work, like GG is apparently doing. So you know nothing about GG or the MRM then, I presume, by your wording here. And you also didn't read the rest of my post, because MRAs are doing all of what the GGers doing. In fact, MRAs are a big part of the GG crowd as well, and they have been attacking feminists/SJWs for longer than GG has even been a thing. Plus, what exactly has "worked" for GG? What has been accomplished? The problem is that this whole battle seems t…
/r/TheRedPill26/05/15 11:08 PM
1

I already responded in the other thread, but I'll do it again here more succinctly. You show no understanding of the MRM. Much of the tactics you laud GG for are similar to if not identical to the ones MRAs have executed. You also fail to acknowledge that much of the GG crowd is composed of MRAs. GG is mostly children whining about journalism in gaming. The MRM is a civil rights movement. You're silly to compare the two, even if they share a common enemy. You criticize the MRM for accomplishing …
/r/MensRights26/05/15 10:15 PM
6

it's obvious this poster hasn't even visited this sub, let alone researched the MRM Right. I think some red pillers like this just have a knee jerk reaction against the MRM because they don't want to associate themselves a group of men who are perceived as "whiners", even if they can admit to themselves that the MRM's grievances are legitimate. Men who complain about anything are shunned for the most part, and guys like this care more about getting laid than justice for men, so they won't take p…
/r/MensRights26/05/15 09:26 PM
3

Man, I started reading this expecting some great insight, but just came away severely disappointed. You don't seem to know what you're talking about at all. MRA's are under the false assumption that society gives a fuck about men in general and their suffering. Due to In group bias, human beings are emotionally numb to the suffering of males, and hypersensitive to the suffering to that of females. Uh, pretty sure fucking most of them know this. That's one of the fundamental premises that MRAs ha…
/r/TheRedPill26/05/15 09:06 PM
2

women needing to be protected, Men being required to sacrifice for, and protect women, Women are gentle, Men are cruel It makes absolutely no sense to claim that these attitudes come from a mindset that "women are lesser than men". It actually makes way more sense to say that it comes from the opposite mindset. Who the fuck do you really think you're fooling? That's a prevailing mindset that was nearly universally accepted for a very long period of time. Yeah, pretty sure that is bullshit. There…
/r/MensRights24/05/15 06:31 AM
4

This IS a part of patriarchy. The false notion that women are kinder and gentler and can do no wrong and therefore must be protected, sheltered and believed at their word. WHAT exactly makes this what you want to call "patriarchy"? Because the only people who I see going around promoting that attitude are feminists--people who openly identify as such. Yet people like you come around and try to place blame on "patriarchy", a concept that nobody actually claims to support? Just seems like a really…
/r/MensRights23/05/15 09:05 PM
3

Men are generally afraid to ever admit that they're victims of anything because it shows weakness. Showing weakness as a man means you're useless and no one wants anything to do with you. But remind him that his dick being cut was not a moment of vulnerability as a man, but rather as an infant. People aren't going to judge him negatively for that. Maybe he's also afraid to confront the idea that his parents may have wronged him in some way, and he doesn't know how to deal with that kind of feeli…
/r/MensRights22/05/15 09:07 PM
1

Good for you. Not everyone is happy with their dicks being cut at birth though. What do you have to say to them?
/r/MensRights11/05/15 03:22 AM
-2

Because anything bad happening to a woman is always worse than the same thing happening to a man. ALWAYS. Think about it. Getting hit? Getting raped? Being "sexually harassed"? Of course infant genital cutting is no exception. Why would it be? We live in a sexist world that cares more about women's safety and feelings no matter what. How widespread feminism has become is clear evidence of that.
/r/MensRights11/05/15 03:19 AM
2

making broad statements about it are usually inaccurate Do you say that to people who say feminism is about equality? a statement like "feminism is a hate movement" is so inaccurate that it's absurd You might find it absurd because it doesn't fit your personal definition of a hate movement, but as long as people actually have arguments to back the statement and state what they think are the defining characteristics of one, it's not absurd, even if you disagree. Like feminists say the MRM is a ha…
/r/MensRights27/04/15 12:30 AM
1

So is the majority of academic feminism this way? Yes. Can we call that feminism? No. Why? If feminism is as diverse and indefinable as you say, why are you even defending it?
/r/MensRights27/04/15 12:15 AM
1

I'd suggest letting the salon know first, they might get scared and just agree to do anyway. If they don't cave then talk to a lawyer maybe. I don't know if the police could actually do anything about it, but I guess it wouldn't hurt to call the non emergency line and ask.
/r/MensRights27/04/15 12:03 AM
5

People like this don't like capitalism because they don't like to compete in meritocracies. Feminists in general are like that because they're lazy, not good at anything, and want everything just handed to them.
/r/MensRights26/04/15 11:46 PM
1

That's probably illegal FYI. The civil rights act was about this kind of shit. It's definitely illegal in California. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unruh_Civil_Rights_Act
/r/MensRights26/04/15 11:33 PM
20

During lunch, a huge feminist comes up to me and asks how it feels to be a fucking asshole. "I'd figure you of all people would know."
/r/MensRights26/04/15 11:29 PM
5

my argument is not that hatred/anti-male ideas don't exist in feminism, but that these aren't representative of the movement as a whole What does represent feminism? Women's rights and empowerment? Then how come they aren't universally on board with say legalizing prostitution and making sex work safe for all women? In fact some are totally against all sex work for women and argue that that they're pretty much all being trafficked or forced into somehow, and it's something no women should be doi…
/r/MensRights26/04/15 11:22 PM
1

Cops, judges, lawyers, etc. are always going to be looking for ways to make money. Just like how professional feminists are always going to be looking to fabricate victimhood out of trivial shit when there's less serious stuff to do it with, so are the people involved in the justice system.
/r/MensRights11/04/15 11:59 PM
7

does that have to do with men lacking rights? Yes, because men lack the amount of due process that is given with other accusations of crimes, thanks to things like rape shield laws. While they are technically gender neutral, in practice they are not. Sort of like Jim Crow era "separate but equal" style segregation, which is another issue that men are also the victims of like with DV shelters. after all there are no laws against men doing things Well off the top of my head I know that men can't a…
/r/MensRights22/03/15 04:08 AM
1

What would prove that we do NOT live in a rape culture? If all it takes for one to claim that we live in a rape culture is some instances of people "victim blaming" rape victims, what makes that observation useful? I think the purpose of the term is just to get people to think that rape happening everywhere all the time with many people condoning and even encouraging it. Which is obviously ridiculous.
/r/MensRights15/03/15 06:53 PM
3

So despite the feminists having complete institutional power on sex issues, and despite them having complete media control (at least until a few cracks opened up recently) their actual numbers as measured by people "strongly" feminist -- you know the type -- are very small and not only that but comparable in number to their committed opponents. Feminism is just a word though. People can say and believe in a lot of stuff that we would associate with feminism without actually identifying with the …
/r/MensRights15/03/15 06:41 PM
2

Why would any of you be friends with this type of person?
/r/MensRights10/03/15 12:22 AM
2

It's like when hipsters like stuff "ironically". It's so that if anyone ever mocks them for it, they can just use that as an excuse.
/r/MensRights08/03/15 11:43 PM
3

Most? I don't think most men even know about the MRM, much less care much about it at all.
/r/MensRights08/03/15 05:59 AM
1

Feminists claim to oppose it so they don't look like obvious assholes but notice how none of them give enough of a shit to actually do anything about it aside from state their stance when someone presses them on the issue. I think it's pretty clear that it's insincere lip service. They can successfully lobby for all sorts of sexist shit but somehow can't even manage to get that done? Then they'll say something about how feminism is only for women, and we should do it ourselves, but of course we'…
/r/MensRights06/03/15 01:58 AM
4

Sounds like they were actually trying to make fun of feminists there because those are very similar to typical feminist talking points.
/r/MensRights11/02/15 11:06 PM
18

If some group of people wanted to make their own girls own club with their own time and resources because they are bigots who have a problem with half the population, there's no one stopping them. But if they're going to use funds from a public university that every student contributes to, there's no room for discrimination. It's not only what's fair, it's the law.
/r/MensRights10/02/15 04:08 AM
2

Are you upset that organizations are trying to get equal representation for women in business and STEM? We're upset that women already outnumber men roughly 2:1 on college campuses in America, yet there's still this bullshit about discriminating against men even more just because there are still some specific fields that men make up the majority of. If disparate impact is enough evidence for prima facie discrimination, then humanities majors should be feeling the pressure to get more boys in. Bu…
/r/MensRights03/02/15 12:41 AM
0

Someone should put up posters about how fat women take up too much space on public transit as a riposte.
/r/MensRights22/01/15 05:39 PM
3

Anyone that wants to "teach men not to rape" thinks at least one of two things. That society actively teaches men to rape. A belief that we know they can't back up with any solid evidence, so really it just means they're delusional or a liar. That men have an innate tendency to rape. Which if they think that then it means they have a very negative and hateful view of men (as if that wasn't obvious already). That's only if we're going by the already established definition of rape though. Another …
/r/MensRights22/01/15 05:36 PM
14

Did they bother to ask women the same kinds of questions? Of course not! They couldn't risk a similar amount of women answering the same way, which would only diminish the message that they're trying to send across--that men are evil and dangerous of course (and not women). You know, I actually wouldn't be surprised at all if more women said they would rape a man, if they used an actually unbiased definition of rape. The idea that men always want sex or that they can't be raped at all is very wi…
/r/MensRights14/01/15 03:23 AM
1

She was pretty sure his memory would be affected On what basis aside from a wild guess? Anyway, you seem to be basing this on the statute from Minnesota that you posted in this thread. Even if we were to assume that's where they live, it's still doubtful that any jury would convict, especially going by the definitions used in there. Mentally impaired seems to mean either a retard or psycho, and for mentally incapacitated it states that they'd need to have been drugged against their will. I dunno…
/r/MensRights03/01/15 01:48 PM
4

people who make a point about the fact they don't understand your argument, and then act as if their ignorance is a problem with you and your argument rather than their own stupidity I just want to say here that it really is your job to effectively communicate an idea. While the people you spoke to may have been being deliberately obtuse, you should be making yourself as clear as possible to leave no room for doubt that's what they're doing.
/r/MensRights03/01/15 03:36 AM
1

Drunk sex isn't always rape. Even if it's a man on a woman. Laws generally state that the victim has to be incapacitated or otherwise unable to communicate consent, not just be simply intoxicated. While yes, it can be argued that complicity with an act of adultery and "taking advantage" of someone with looser inhibitions is immoral, neither of those things are crimes and it will not hold up as rape in court.
/r/MensRights02/01/15 09:49 PM
3

Because women's interests take priority over men's. Always. People who collect child support payments make money off it.
/r/MensRights02/01/15 09:39 PM
3

You know why this shit happens? Because it's simply cheaper to pay people with ego bribes for doing a good job or even risking their lives. But yeah, it's especially embarrassing and demeaning to have to stand in front of a bunch of other people while you go through a whole bunch of stupid formalities for a commander or something to accept a stupid ass reward.
/r/MensRights02/01/15 12:57 PM
7

The military pretty much gives out awards like kindergarten teachers give out stickers for good behavior. This is hardly anything new.
/r/MensRights02/01/15 06:49 AM
4

feminism stands for something that a lot of modern day extremists fight against And what do you think that is?
/r/MensRights27/12/14 10:40 PM
75

They don't want a debate regarding gender issues, they want only their own perspectives, and they want them regarded as the holy truth. That's pretty much it. People are generally not very good at thinking for themselves and forming new ideas so they just tend to believe whatever they're told, and feminists know that. That's why making sure ideas that conflict with their narrative are censored is very important to them. They know that everything they say is bullshit so the moment that anyone act…
/r/MensRights27/12/14 09:20 PM
5

So here has expressed intolerance towards women's rights? All I did here was correct you when you tried to conflate that with feminism.
/r/MensRights27/12/14 08:39 PM
8

Name me one redeeming quality of modern day feminism then. It's all about fear mongering and denigrating men. The feminists who believe in patriarchy and male privilege are not "outliers", that's all of them, otherwise they wouldn't be feminists.
/r/MensRights27/12/14 08:37 PM
10

this same intolerance What same intolerance? We don't like feminists because of their intolerance of men. Being a man is a condition of birth. Being a feminist is not. How is that the "same" kind of intolerance?
/r/MensRights27/12/14 05:18 PM
7

I took that to mean that everyone is different. Notice how they even said "men and other men aren't equal". That's true. Are you "equal" to someone like LeBron James for instance? Or Stephen Hawking? Do you think you have the same abilities or intellect as these people? Even if we're going by what you seem to be inferring, which is that someone stating two things aren't equal means that one has less value, it's still true. Some people are simply more valuable to society than others. Whether peop…
/r/MensRights27/12/14 04:33 PM
25

You're perpetuating the conflict between men's rights and women's rights by disregarding the value of equality. That's assuming that feminism stands for women's rights. It doesn't. At least not any more than white nationalists stand for "white rights".
/r/MensRights27/12/14 04:20 PM
3

Correct. The only thing the two subreddits have in common is we do not prioritize the interests of women above all else, and reject feminist propaganda. In a gynocentric society, of course people are bound to view anyone like that as essentially the same.
/r/MensRights19/12/14 05:35 PM
7

Why does anyone lie about anything? To get away with shit, to mislead others, for power.
/r/MensRights10/12/14 12:53 AM
1

Also: segregation, giving up their seats, LE profiling.
/r/MensRights10/12/14 12:47 AM
1

Feminists keep having the gall to pretend that they represent all women and all of their interests, but they don't. It's more like saying black people have issues to a white nationalist. What's the ideology that pretends to represent black people or men? There aren't any, they just have civil rights movements.
/r/MensRights10/12/14 12:45 AM
1

"What makes them not pieces of shit now?"
/r/MensRights09/12/14 12:52 AM
2

This shit with feminists trying to discourage victims from reporting their rapes by making it seem like they won't be believed by anyone is the real rape culture. They want as many rapists to get away with their crimes so that as much rape happens as possible, to help them promote their anti-male agenda. The goal should be to get as much actual rape to stop, but almost everything feminists say and do is counterproductive to that. Because if rape ever stopped happening, that's one less victim car…
/r/MensRights09/12/14 12:51 AM
3

The best way to tell which kind it is, is to look at the person's previous posting history. For example, if most of their comments are on SRS, it's probably a concern troll. What the hell? They're obviously not that stupid. Most of them make new accounts that they only use to post here. The best way to tell is to see if they are ever active on any other subreddits, what kind of posts they make here and if they're criticizing the MRM more than anything else, and to see if they are trying to const…
/r/MensRights09/12/14 12:44 AM
2

It comes from deliberate misrepresentations of well meaning advice. But since the feminists don't actually want less rape to happen, since rape hysteria is a powerful tool they can use against men, they are against anything close to legitimate rape prevention advice that doesn't involve attacking or denigrating men.
/r/MensRights09/12/14 12:37 AM
0

resisted arrest What? Did you see the video? He put his hands up while a guy behind him put his arm around his neck. Once his hands were in cuffs, the police took note of his breathless state and called an ambulance. After ignoring his cries of "I can't breath".
/r/MensRights05/12/14 06:41 AM
1

there have been instances in the past where MRA's have threatened users with rape or death That was all made up, one of the admins went over to r/twox one time and outed them all out as liars.
/r/MensRights04/12/14 07:32 AM
1

Oh look, another Sarkeesian video posted here. Eagerly awaiting the feminist brigade that always comes when that happens.
/r/MensRights02/12/14 10:07 PM
4

are you at least willing to admit that there are more pressures on men to be assertive than women, especially in courting scenarios? Yes, mostly because those pressures come from women. And? That also means that they have to deal with more unwanted interactions with people, and with more people who won't take no for an answer. What does that have to do with opportunity, which you just said is a part of privilege? Privileged people of course always have more people who want something from them bo…
/r/MensRights02/12/14 03:27 AM
5

There are pressures on men to approach and pressures on women to wai tto be approached. And what's causing them? What is it that deters women but not men, and rewards men but not women? It's about what society does and doesn't expect from you, and what opportunities are open to you be virtue of things beyond your control Okay so here you're saying it's about opportunity, but how does that fit in with your little bar scenario? Women get approached more so they have more opportunities for social i…
/r/MensRights02/12/14 01:22 AM
6

Why are people not approaching men? Because of societal pressures. Societal pressure to do what? What are you even talking about? And why should I accept that as the sole reason that men in general get approached less? Men get approached less for lots of different reasons, mostly because women are pickier and also since they get approached so often it's pointless to do the work of initiating conversation. But also because men are seen as more of a threat. Anyway my point is that you don't get to…
/r/MensRights02/12/14 12:46 AM
1

Well women's spaces are usually just where they can trash talk men uninhibited and without needing to dress up their language to sound less sexist. So they think that's basically what any men's space will be, just with the sexes reversed.
/r/MensRights02/12/14 12:34 AM
16

Female B is then approached by male's B, C, D, and E. Male A was only approached by female B (check one for men, for not being annoyed by random people when they just want a drink For not being annoyed? WHAT? If they didn't want to talk to anyone you'd think they'd just drink at home. How is having less people showing interest in you and wanting to talk you a "privilege"? By this train of thought, ugly people are also more privileged in this context. That's absurd. Male E gets argumentative and …
/r/MensRights02/12/14 12:19 AM
1

Sorry but you're a noobie that's clearly clueless and don't know that there have been people trying to find common ground with feminists for decades, and even started on their side at first. Prime example being Warren Farrell. By far the most reasonable voice concerning gender issues, and feminists always just ignore everything he says to bring up a couple things he's said in the past that they deliberately misinterpret to smear his reputation. Point being is that it does not matter how much you…
/r/MensRights02/12/14 12:11 AM
2

Child support should only exists for fathers who have "opted in" to parenthood through something like, I dunno marraige. That would eliminate women's "right" to force men into fatherhood and child support payments without their consent.
/r/MensRights02/12/14 12:04 AM
1

"or assault" Haha. I don't think anyone knows a man that hasn't been assaulted in some way at least once in their life. If it only happens to 20% of women that would truly show their privilege.
/r/MensRights01/12/14 07:30 AM
1

No it isn't. Show me one.
/r/MensRights30/11/14 11:04 PM
6

The "you can't consent when you're drunk" thing is a complete misconception based on the idea that it's not ethical to "take advantage" of someone who's drunk. It's not something that will hold up in any court of law, generally the victim has to be fully incapacitated for it to legally be considered rape.
/r/MensRights30/11/14 11:01 PM
1

You don't consider it rape when sexual acts are performed on an unconscious person?
/r/MensRights29/11/14 12:32 AM
3

What's with using the Red Pill as a symbol? It's a corny analogy that only some people use because they feel like everyone gets fed a lot of lies about gender and sex (mostly by feminists), so finding the truth is like taking the red pill in the matrix movies. The harsh reality that people wake up to is that men are disposable and nobody gives a shit about them. Are you aware that women have, historically, been the ones discriminated against, and that women actually get paid less for the same jo…
/r/MensRights29/11/14 12:25 AM
3

That's actually illegal in a lot of places.
/r/MensRights28/11/14 04:43 PM
4

"This is what I was wearing when it happened. TELL ME I WAS ASKING FOR IT."
/r/MensRights17/11/14 03:18 AM
3

Because as a man, your life is worth less than a woman's.
/r/MensRights17/11/14 03:14 AM
2

Lol so you only give a shit about how unfair child support is as soon as it directly impacts your life?
/r/MensRights14/11/14 09:47 PM
1

It hurts both men and women. And? They clearly think it hurts women a lot more. They talk about how to help women by whining about how much better men supposedly have it. Well, aren't they? LOL, no. How? I've heard every feminist argument about that and none of it is even close to oppression, if it's not something that they just made up. Besides, if you think that's true and what makes it acceptable to talk about something, are you saying that feminists have NEVER done anything bad for men which…
/r/MensRights09/11/14 01:09 AM
1

"Privilege" and "patriarchy" are concepts within feminist theory. Yeah, and they claim that a patriarchy privileges men over women. They attack men by claiming that men are oppressing women. Not just the MRM, men as a whole. Why is that acceptable when you think that criticism of feminism is not? No, it's not referring just to men Okay. And when we talk about feminism we aren't referring to just women. and it's not a synonym for the Men's Rights movement, believe it or not. Sure but feminists ta…
/r/MensRights09/11/14 12:07 AM
2

That's...not even close to what I said. Those things are obviously what feminists talk about, and I asked you why you think they do that.
/r/MensRights08/11/14 10:44 PM
6

Why are feminists always going on about male privilege and patriarchy if feminism is supposed to be for women?
/r/MensRights08/11/14 10:23 PM
1

That's an understandable reaction even from someone that would be sympathetic towards men's issues, because you never know what everyone else in the room thinks about the topic, and how they'll react to discussion about it. A lot of the time it's just not worth creating a hostile atmosphere over something like that.
/r/MensRights08/11/14 10:21 PM
2

Like I said, I do not in any way support this behavior. Despite the fact that it some how worked out for me, my views on the subject have not changed. I was about to start calling her stupid and shit, but you know, she probably only said that because she doesn't want anybody jumping down her throat and calling her a horrible person for condoning "street harassment."
/r/MensRights06/11/14 02:01 AM
1

They don't actually think that, they just say that because if they make any statements about men being inherently more violent and evil and rapey (like it's obviously they want to), they recognize that makes them look like complete bigots and man haters to most other people. So they go with shit about how society or "male culture" or whatever just taught men to be bad, and that feminists need to fix it with their cultural crusades. Because to them that makes them look less like assholes.
/r/MensRights05/11/14 09:18 PM
15

The reason given was that they were edited out because they were either out of the shot or drowned out with some other noise like a siren. Basically an obviously fake lame ass excuse that they came up with as to why there weren't any white people in the video so they can try to seem less racist.
/r/MensRights04/11/14 08:13 PM
1

Selfish women.
/r/MensRights04/11/14 06:01 AM
7

I think you're severely misinterpreting what I said if you inferred that I was trying to say men don't want to have children. Men do want to have children, but they also want to be able to choose who they want to have them with. Male BC gives them that choice, which in turn takes away some of women's choice. Many women won't like that.
/r/MensRights04/11/14 05:52 AM
4

Huge blow to female privilege and monopoly on reproductive rights. Many women will get desperate and start doing all sorts of crazy things, including trying to get it banned. Actually, that's probably a huge reason why male BC has been "just around the corner" for several decades now.
/r/MensRights04/11/14 05:39 AM
2

I'm saying it's fucking stupid that people think this is an issue. That's fine. I don't care. I think you're fucking stupid. What about essentially forcing men to sign up for the selective service? What about men committing suicide at rates drastically higher than women? Any of the stereotypes that men face? We talk about this shit all the time but there are only so many times you can rehash a topic so that's why it's not on the front page right now. It's all in the sidebar as well though.
/r/MensRights04/11/14 03:37 AM
3

You are complaining about a few bathrooms in one college in NC. Unless you go to college there, it does not affect you at all. This is not the first time I've heard of such a thing happening though. Random colleges all over America are doing this and getting away with it. If they continue to do so that sets the precedent that it's okay to discriminate against men and even more places will do it. Then what if one day I run into one of these places and it does effect me? I'm not allowed to say any…
/r/MensRights04/11/14 03:12 AM
3

"separate but equal" most definitely was equal? You mean was not equal? Yeah. But at least they tried to pretend it was. Feminists don't even want to do that.
/r/MensRights04/11/14 02:40 AM
10

Hey feminists, who were the ones comparable to white supremacists again? Oh wait, even they were fine with separate but equal. So feminists are even worse than them.
/r/MensRights04/11/14 12:07 AM
1

Harassment already has its own legal definition and it's not anywhere in line with what feminists are claiming counts as it. The fucking issue is ridiculous and just further shows that feminism is nothing more than spoiled rich white girl problems. Imagine a guy complaining about how fat and ugly women shouldn't be allowed to flirt with him and how much of an asshole he'd look like. These people are a joke.
/r/MensRights03/11/14 06:07 AM
1

Pretty sure OP is talking about how some European countries only make it a crime to pay for the services of a sex worker, and do nothing to actual prostitutes themselves. But I'm not sure if he's asking about this genuinely or is merely making a half joking suggestion to try to turn the feminists' own fucked up rationale against them.
/r/MensRights03/11/14 06:03 AM
1

Men doing anything that doesn't make themselves useful to women or that they don't approve of need to be shamed.
/r/MensRights02/11/14 11:27 PM
-1

Why don't we all agree that men shouldn't harass random women in the street We do, we just don't agree with what exactly constitutes as "harassment", because nothing in the video should be considered as such. It's pretty damning evidence that catcalling is a problem. At best, it's evidence that cat calling happens in certain locations, mostly densely populated urban areas, and even then only in the seedier neighborhoods. But then at that point if they acknowledge the specific thing that they hav…
/r/MensRights30/10/14 06:43 PM
8

Yet most violence inside the home, including elderly and child abuse, is committed by women. So it does make sense that they'd commit half of partner violence.
/r/MensRights28/10/14 09:38 PM
-16

Humblebrag -the video. "I'm being so oppressed by others calling me attractive, WAAAAAAAAAAAH" Those clowns in twox are even arguing that all the polite comments are still harassment. Jesus Christ.
/r/MensRights28/10/14 07:30 PM
1

Why do you believe such an obviously fake story? First they claim they supported MRAs at first, until she saw a "violent video" (which one?). This is something you see feminists lie about occasionally because they see so many MRAs who talk about being former feminists. But they're so out of touch with reality that they forget that there's probably not a single person on the planet who has familiarized themselves with the MRM before feminism, because that's how freaking popular feminism is. Then …
/r/MensRights28/10/14 02:16 AM
60

Seemed too obviously man hatey to me so I had to check if it was real and it is. This is just like racists going after "black culture". But these fucking cowards are too scared to attack them so they go after harmless nerds who play video games.
/r/MensRights25/10/14 01:09 AM
1

If "male privilege" exists then so does black privilege and homeless privilege and handicapped privilege just because you can name some examples of them being treated better in specific contexts. But at that point the concept of privilege just becomes a joke, doesn't it? Anyway, I'd contend the presumption of incompetence some people tend to have when it comes to women is a consequence of their privilege (like many of women's issues). Many people acknowledge that most women are coddled and spoil…
/r/MensRights24/10/14 09:10 PM
6

Oh and I noticed that you didn't seem to get what I meant when I said white privilege is also women's privilege. That was in reference to things like incarceration rates, sentencing disparities, and general police profiling.
/r/MensRights24/10/14 05:22 AM
5

That's not a "document" that's a wikipedia article. And not once on it does it even SAY "equal work". Go ahead and ctrl-f it.
/r/MensRights24/10/14 05:18 AM
11

That's you misinterpreting what the numbers are actually saying, and misleading people into believing hate propaganda that men are evil assholes that pay women less for no good reason. Women earn less than men on average. That's different from being payed less for equal work.
/r/MensRights24/10/14 05:05 AM
8

You think women get paid more than men Not for equal work they don't. Women on aggregate do earn less traceable income though but that's because of their privilege. It's not oppression to work less than men, and do less of the dangerous jobs. wield disproportionate economic and political power? I don't think the numbers are going to bear that out. What fucking numbers are there for a vague statement like that? Female voters outnumber male ones in America and politicians always talking about wome…
/r/MensRights24/10/14 04:59 AM
5

Women don't get paid less for equal work, and nobody thinks they should be.
/r/MensRights24/10/14 04:47 AM
13

You think acknowledging that male privilege exists is "degrading" to you? Yes, mostly because it's a lie. I'm white and I recognize that white privilege exists. I don't feel degraded by that at all. Well would you feel degraded if I told you that female privilege exist? Think of any kind of privilege that white people have and it's the exact same that women do as well. if something that self-evident You not having an actual argument or concrete proof for something doesn't make it "self-evident".…
/r/MensRights24/10/14 04:46 AM
3

I suspect that in those cases it's a defense mechanism against people who try to prevent them from having equal rights. Pffft. What rights do women not have that men do? It's men who have less rights. You're a joke.
/r/MensRights24/10/14 04:41 AM
5

Many people feel that women shouldn't be drafted or in the military because their lives are too valuable to be put in any kind of danger. The other thing you said is bullshit.
/r/MensRights24/10/14 04:33 AM
13

it doesn't Male privilege, patriarchy, toxic masculinity doesn't ring a bell to you? The only thing that is actually ever consistent with feminism is attacking men. Name one feminist issue that you feel maybe isn't used to attack men and I'll explain to you how it's done. And you have the gall to compare feminists to any legitimate civil rights group? Last I remember it was feminists who wanted to promote segregation and keep men out of their "safe spaces".
/r/MensRights24/10/14 04:30 AM
3

That's pretty much the whole point of feminism. It's to fuck over men who they think are losers and unfit for reproduction. Notice how they pretend to complain about men who are at the top of society but never actually attack them. Obama is their freaking hero for christ's sake. Meanwhile what they actually do is go after the men with no actual power and try to get them locked up or socially ostracized for the most innocuous shit like being "creepy" or whatever.
/r/MensRights24/10/14 04:27 AM
1

r/feminism is not controversial but SRS definitely is. How the fuck is it not on there?
/r/MensRights23/10/14 07:10 AM
3

Sure. But that doesn't justify her being entitled to his money.
/r/MensRights16/10/14 01:50 AM
13

What is it that many people don't get? That men are people who deserve the same rights and freedoms that women have.
/r/MensRights16/10/14 01:49 AM
9

This is the same reason why it's hard to start a white pride/heritage group! Well a hundred years ago that would have been pretty easy. You idiots and your appeals to the status quo seem to all too often forget that just because an idea is popular doesn't automatically make it fair or just.
/r/MensRights15/10/14 07:49 PM
1

"Man-bash festival" "Sexist event" These are people that are openly hateful. Why protest this at all when it's such a great example of shameless bigots?
/r/MensRights14/10/14 03:38 AM
0

Our induction in the feminist movement was when the most aggressive view was that men and women are equal. That's bullshit. If you really thought men and women were equal you'd think they should be treated the exact same, and also wouldn't be advocating for sex segregation everywhere. This was at a time when women, especially women of minority demographics, had very little rights within society. Which was when, exactly? How old are you?
/r/MensRights12/10/14 01:59 AM
6

She just acknowledged that it's completely unfair and wrong though, she's just saying "tough shit, it's for the children". Because now all of a sudden her top priority isn't equality, it's her vision of what she thinks is best for society.
/r/MensRights12/10/14 01:56 AM
0

We do NOT support the idea that one victim group is worse off than another. I was going to respond to most of what you said point by point, until I read that, because it's a clear indication of bad faith. If you think that neither men nor women have it worse, then why do you call yourself a feminist? You're a dishonest bullshitter, go fuck yourself.
/r/MensRights12/10/14 01:49 AM
1

Their flair in r/againstmensrights is "The Artist Formerly Known as DualPollux".
/r/MensRights06/10/14 07:28 AM
27

You were talking to the latest account of TheIdesofLight/DualPollux, someone who has already been shadowbanned at least twice. They're a batshit insane sexist and racist. That sub has been taken over by feminists like her and is used to promote their agenda. The irony in her comments is hilarious.
/r/MensRights05/10/14 08:56 PM
5

"If you use gendered insults against women you're a sexist misogynist." "Stop mansplaining and throwing mantrums, you manchild."
/r/MensRights04/10/14 08:12 PM
13

It's basically like children thinking adults have it so much better because they think adults can do whatever they want and have everyone immediately respect them and their opinions.
/r/MensRights03/10/14 05:08 AM
7

Really that just seems like a cover so they don't come off as sexists so obviously. Like when racists say they don't have a problem with black people necessarily, just black "culture". A lot of what feminists say indicates that they think men are inherently violent and rapey.
/r/MensRights03/10/14 05:02 AM
1

Sort of, but that's only something some of them concede to as an afterthought. They still argue that women are the primary victims of rape culture.
/r/MensRights03/10/14 04:56 AM
1

Do we know for certain if he actually was though? It's possible that's just how journalists decided to spin the story.
/r/MensRights03/10/14 04:55 AM
12

I don't see any problem with circumcision. Neither do any of us, as long as it's adults willingly doing it to themselves. The problem comes when it's done to innocent children before they are even able to say no.
/r/MensRights30/09/14 05:53 AM
20

why do men blame women/feminists for circumcision? That...doesn't really happen. I think what you meant to ask is why feminists always feel the need to argue that cutting up a female infant's genitals is always "worse" somehow, so they can say it's not an equal rights issue that it's only legal to do it to baby boys. And the answer to that is they're simply sexist assholes.
/r/MensRights30/09/14 05:49 AM
1

Why are 91% of serial killers male? Probably has a lot to do with men being a lot more genetically diverse which results in more psychopaths being male. But it also does not account for indirect violence like hiring killers or inspiring vigilante attacks by making false accusations, which is something that privileged people like women and the rich are a lot more capable of. Why murder someone yourself when you can just get someone else to do it for you? Feminists would argue that those rape stat…
/r/MensRights26/09/14 09:05 PM
2

It's behind a paywall so I can't know for sure, but I've seen other ones similar to it like this one where it admits that's what they do. Otherwise can you really imagine anyone explicitly saying rape is okay under certain circumstances like that?
/r/MensRights19/09/14 08:01 PM
5

No, surveys like this never actually use the word word "rape" when asking the questions. They just describe a scenario that they would count as rape, and ask if they think it's okay, often with really vague and confusing wording though to make it more likely they get the results that they want. They want to be able to report that a significant amount of people think rape is okay so that they can say we live in a rape culture.
/r/MensRights19/09/14 07:34 PM
1

"Think of the children!!!"
/r/MensRights19/09/14 07:25 PM
5

It was probably just the way they worded their question since they obviously couldn't use the word word "rape". They probably asked something like do you feel like sex is "owed" or something because you know feminists always throw a fit over shit like that and would immediately interpret that as rape.
/r/MensRights19/09/14 07:07 PM
8

men's reputations are often elevated with labels such as 'stud' and 'player' It's amusing how you say this while apparently not being aware at all of the connotations of the word "player". I guess we're forgetting that men who sleep around a lot are also often chastised for being manipulative and unwilling to commit. Men who even TALK about how to be successful with women or what kind of women they find attractive are accused of being creepy and objectifying women. And all too often those accusa…
/r/MensRights18/09/14 05:39 AM
1

What? That's the standard initial clothing allowance for the navy. They give you your uniforms at boot camp for all branches, that's just what they spend.
/r/MensRights16/09/14 07:34 AM
2

There's nothing wrong with porn. Feminists hate porn because they're insecure, jealous of women that are prettier than them, and hate men so they can't stand when men find outlets for pleasure, even though hating porn totally conflicts with the idea that women should be able to do what they want with their bodies. Because they don't really care about women like they claim to, they just care about hating men and controlling them. Also FYI, /r/offmychest is moderated by feminist bullies.
/r/MensRights10/09/14 01:18 AM
1

Remember these are the same people trying to tell everyone that 1 in 4 women be raped. Need I say more?
/r/MensRights06/09/14 06:59 AM
-7

About half the users of 2X didn't want it to become a default at the time. That's because most of them were man haters that didn't want more people coming in and disagreeing with them. Those types of people tend to be very sensitive about their opinions and don't like being challenged.
/r/MensRights30/08/14 03:07 AM
0

I have been extremely confused as to why twoxchromosomes has been made a default subreddit. Because retards all over reddit have tried to give the site a reputation of not being friendly to women just because women's asses aren't kissed all the time everywhere. So that's the admins idea of a remedy, by making a supposedly more woman friendly sub more visible. Reddit want's to remain as unbiased as possible with everything Says who? When did that become their position? if twoxchromosomes is a def…
/r/MensRights30/08/14 03:04 AM
2

That sub had less than 200k right before it became a default. All the subreddits that became a default had their subscriber count skyrocket.
/r/MensRights30/08/14 03:00 AM
3

Wikipedia has an academic bias, and a consensus bias. That means nothing. All it's saying really is that academia is filled with these sexist bigots so is wikipedia. That doesn't justify anything. a tit for tat approach will not help Oh so you think it's fine if the rules aren't enforced evenly then? If you can admit that feminists are constantly breaking the rules, how come nothing's ever being done about it? How come it only seems to be a problem when people from here do?
/r/MensRights29/08/14 07:46 PM
1

I live near sac, anything I can do to help?
/r/MensRights29/08/14 04:01 AM
1

Anyone can believe anything is harmful to society. But they have to at least try to prove it if they really want to convince anyone. As far as I know she hasn't even come close to doing that. So basically what her videos are really about is "I don't like these things and you shouldn't either." This is all pretty obvious and simple, and if you tried to pull this in an argument with a SJW, you'd get shut down pretty quick. LOL. I can't even imagine what you mean by that, they're pretty bad at argu…
/r/MensRights28/08/14 10:41 PM
2

You can argue that X is harmful to society at large while still "liking" X. Maybe hypothetically, but the vast majority of the time I believe people just say it's harmful to society so they can get others to not like what they don't like. Because they can't stand it when people like things that they don't. Ever heard a sermon against pornography? Yeah, and that's the same thing. Or a recovering addict describe the object of their addiction? So someone that doesn't like a drug anymore because of …
/r/MensRights28/08/14 08:53 PM
2

Anyone can make that argument about anything they don't like. Don't act like there's a huge difference there.
/r/MensRights28/08/14 07:48 PM
14

Voicing an opinion you don't like isn't cramming it down your throat. No, of course it's not. Voicing your opinion in every discussion forum you can find is though.
/r/MensRights28/08/14 06:35 PM
28

NO ONE IS FORCING YOU TO WATCH HER VIDEOS. IF YOU DONT LIKE HER THEN YOU CAN JUST IGNORE HER How about you and all her followers take your own advice here and just don't play games you don't like then? For fuck's sake.
/r/MensRights28/08/14 06:12 PM
17

Cramming it down everyone's throat? lol. How? They say as they come to a forum like this to defend feminists.
/r/MensRights28/08/14 06:08 PM
1

I don't think these idiots can make it any more clear that they actually want rape to happen as much as it can at this point to justify their fear mongering and attacks on men.
/r/MensRights26/08/14 05:59 PM
3

I don't think you face the same issue with unattractive women--I'm physically threatened, you're bothered. It's very much an issue, because a lot of angry, rejected men take their anger out on women. Fuck you asshole. Women get angry at rejection too and they are just as capable of violence as men. Stature is irrelevant if you're attacked by surprise or they're brandishing a weapon. And not only am I potentially physically threatened by her, but also by any other nearby white knights she manages…
/r/MensRights21/08/14 04:15 AM
4

I'm telling you I don't want to hear an old man tell me to suck his dick when I walk to work. And I don't want to hear you bitch about how sometimes people are rude to you because you don't have any real problems since you live such a privileged life. Now what? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gender_pay_gap Yes men, on average, earn more than women when it comes to traceable income. That's because men are the workhorses of society and most women don't want anything to do with men that earn less tha…
/r/MensRights21/08/14 03:28 AM
1

My point is that 1 in 5 women who suffer physical violence suffer it at the hands of a male intimate partner. And you're ignoring that fact, and all of the connotations and implications of it What connotations and implications? That women are safer than men? It's a pretty big problem, everywhere, for both genders. Then why are you using at as an example of why you think men have it better?
/r/MensRights21/08/14 02:42 AM
3

Don't tell me you'd be laughing if you were in the room with me when my boss had an erection while talking about the tightness of my clothes. Okay I did gloss over the part about your boss saying this so I'll have to change my position a bit and admit that's kind of serious. But you do have a lot more power in this situation than you seem to believe, especially compared to any man that finds himself in similar circumstances. If where you work has an HR department you can take your complaint ther…
/r/MensRights21/08/14 02:35 AM
5

not be told... without being told... not be told You really believe it should be illegal for others to say things you don't like in certain situations? That's infringing on others' rights to free speech, jackass. You don't want more rights, you want to take away peoples' rights. The right to earn as much as my identically-qualified, identically-titled colleague who does the same job as me. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equal_Pay_Act_of_1963 The right to be listened to by my boss for my ideas, wit…
/r/MensRights21/08/14 02:02 AM
3

As a generally privileged, upper class woman, however, I still do think I'm oppressed. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. This is why we don't take you and all other feminists seriously. those are things that it seems many MRAs dismiss as unimportant And they aren't important. Not even close. I know there are probably some people here who will try to kiss your ass and pretend to feel sorry for you about things things, but I won't. Because they're, at best, first world problems. Let's discuss: Someone didn't ta…
/r/MensRights21/08/14 12:51 AM
1

The name isn't important (at least to me). You can call me whatever the fuck you want, I don't give a shit. It just so happens that men face civil rights issues that are unique to their gender, and that's why it's in the name. Feminists on the other hand usually even admit that they're not even fighting for any specific rights anymore. However the name is still important them because they feel it promotes the idea that women are still oppressed or whatever and need to always be looking out for e…
/r/MensRights21/08/14 12:31 AM
2

still tend to demonize women fighting for their rights What fucking rights? What fucking rights do women not have that you think they should?
/r/MensRights21/08/14 12:24 AM
6

2008 Bureau of Justice stats estimate that 22% of all violence against women is committed by an intimate partner; that number is 5% for men. THAT'S BECAUSE MEN ARE SO MUCH MORE LIKELY TO BE VICTIMS OF EVERY OTHER TYPE OF VIOLENCE. HOLY SHIT. Seriously. Just look up the raw numbers, not the percentages. The raw numbers show there are just about the same amount of men who are attacked by their partners IIRC. Why is intimate violence even so important to you?
/r/MensRights21/08/14 12:16 AM
2

Don't come here and tell us what we're allowed to say. You have no power here, why don't you just stick to your feminist safe spaces. If you want to argue a point, just do that.
/r/MensRights21/08/14 12:10 AM
1

I'm just curious about why someone who might choose "male" in this scenario would then turn around and say that men need more rights than they already have If that's all there was to be concerned about, of course anyone who believed that would pick to be a woman. But that's not the only thing to think about. Like, from a philosophical perspective, why do people choose to play video games on hard mode? Life isn't as fun when there's less challenges to throw your way, and there'd be less opportuni…
/r/MensRights21/08/14 12:08 AM
3

Men think they have the right to shout sexual slurs Sorry when that become illegal? It's not against the law to be rude or an asshole in every situation. So yes, men are correct in thinking they have that right, just like you have the right to come here and post stupid shit, or come up to me on the street and say whatever you want. They shout "BUT MUH FREEDOM!" the moment someone suggests they don't have a right to women's bodies Huh? Rape and slavery are crimes. What the fuck are you talking ab…
/r/MensRights10/08/14 05:57 PM
2

Why would you even want to ban them though? It's a giant warning sign telling you who you should stay far away from.
/r/MensRights09/08/14 12:48 AM
28

So are they really explicitly saying that it's okay to judge a group of people by the actions of a few? Now they're just openly defending bigotry. Against men that is, of course they'd always be the first to argue that this line of thinking is wrong whenever it's about women or feminists.
/r/MensRights08/08/14 06:14 PM
1

You're welcome.
/r/MensRights07/08/14 01:23 AM
9

This is not worth responding to But let me respond anyway.
/r/MensRights07/08/14 12:04 AM
2

http://www.foxnews.com/tech/2013/09/06/wikistorming-colleges-offer-credit-to-corrupt-wikipedia/ http://www.campusreform.org/?ID=5028
/r/MensRights06/08/14 01:24 PM
6

Fucking feminists seem to have no idea what the word conspiracy means. Conspiracies are a secret. It's no fucking secret that feminists have organized canvassing campaigns on wikipedia and have even offered college credits for it. They'll often brag about censoring MRA content too. But meanwhile their version of "the patriarchy" is not a conspiracy even though nobody seriously even claims to be a part of it.
/r/MensRights06/08/14 02:36 AM
2

There's no reason to give a shit about violence against fictitious characters.
/r/MensRights01/08/14 11:33 AM
-9

How is this shit even considered "sexual harassment"? Definitely inappropriate, but not that.
/r/MensRights01/08/14 11:26 AM
2

Don't concern yourself with the opinions of people who are always looking for things to be offended by. It's futile.
/r/MensRights28/07/14 04:50 PM
3

My father (a traditionally masculine Mexican man complete with tattoos and a penchant for drugs) couldn't give a shit. He's actually glad that I'm a Feminist and he's told me this. I don't know what would because I don't know anything about him. Do you want me to psychologically analyze your father, who I don't know, through the internet? Something you just chastised someone else for doing?
/r/MensRights25/07/14 05:13 PM
17

It's funny how often feminists say MRAs don't do anything, but then throw a complete shitfit whenever we do. Like for example any of the men's conferences or flooding that anonymous rape reporter.
/r/MensRights23/07/14 01:29 AM
2

Feminists say prostitution/porn are exploitation because it takes advantage of desperate women who are only doing it for the money. You can argue that about any job that's shitty really. But there are actually plenty of women that do it because they like it. You can't really say that about a job like being a garbage man or something.
/r/MensRights23/07/14 01:26 AM
-4

MtF trans people are more likely to be attacked Not sure if true but it wouldn't surprise me. They're trying to impersonate a higher rank. Why do you think there are so many more MtF than FtM trans people? Because it's so much harder being a poor wombyn? and also often have their rights breached. How?
/r/MensRights20/07/14 02:25 AM
14

That's like saying since we have black president now, how can black people have it bad? It's just a really dumb assumption. Also most of us don't even like these men in government. Obama is probably one of the most white knight presidents ever. Just because they are men, that doesn't mean they represent all of men's interests. They represent their own first, like every other rich fuck. They look out for themselves and other rich fucks. Class comes first with these people. Can you even imagine wh…
/r/MensRights16/07/14 01:32 PM
3

Oh well if you say so then it must be true.
/r/MensRights14/07/14 12:50 AM
1

but continually discussing it here does NOT promote mens rights the way that the discussion of social and legal inequalities does ...except for all those times feminists promote legal and social inequality.
/r/MensRights13/07/14 11:59 PM
4

Feminists routinely oppose equal shared parenting legislation. They support throwing men in jail who are behind on alimony on child support. They laugh at our idea of legal paternal surrender. They always label men who complain about anything as a bunch of whiners. Sorry but one dinky article about what one person wrote about feminism doesn't rewrite everything that feminists have done.
/r/MensRights13/07/14 11:55 PM
0

One of my favorite parts of feminism is the way it seeks to expand/remove the policing of acceptable gendered spheres of behavior and seeks to give men the ability to embody traits generally percieved as feminine without societal repurcussions. How the fuck do they do that?
/r/MensRights13/07/14 11:28 PM
2

Hate on feminism elsewhere When the fuck did feminism become beyond scrutiny and criticism? That's why most of us are here in the first place, dipshit. Because we don't agree with a lot of what feminists have to say about gender issues. Nothing is above debate, not even us. If you want to talk about what specifically you have a problem with, go ahead. Whining about how we talk about feminists too much doesn't help with anything. Be inclusive to men's rights other than just the common complaints …
/r/MensRights13/07/14 11:21 PM
0

I heard earlier that /r/femradebates was moderated with a feminist angle It is. I was banned for the dumbest bullshit. One comment of mine that was deleted included the sentence, "Women didn't start complaining about staying safe at home until they had cushier jobs available to them because of the industrial revolution." Apparently that's a negative generalization against women. Meanwhile saying shit like men are privileged is not, I guess? Then the next and final one that got me banned permanen…
/r/MensRights13/07/14 06:17 PM
-11

I've been on this subreddit for several hours now Wow that must mean you're so well versed on this topic.
/r/MensRights11/07/14 03:42 AM
3

I don't want beggars asking me for money and I wouldn't want people harassing me like in this video Sure, I don't either. That doesn't make it some kind of huge social issue though. Sometimes people do stuff that annoys you that isn't necessarily wrong. People randomly commenting on how attractive they find you isn't a civil rights issue.
/r/MensRights06/07/14 05:09 AM
1

How is this any different than say someone who looks upper class walking through the streets and having beggars "harass" them for change or something? I don't feel bad for them. Oh poor you, sometimes people make you feel uncomfortable because they want something from you. I don't give a shit.
/r/MensRights06/07/14 04:06 AM
1

So what made you change then?
/r/MensRights04/07/14 03:47 AM
1

Aside from what has already been mentioned in the thread, people have been banned for consistently being too aggressive with other posters and/or saying a lot of negative generalizations about women, even if they do seem to be genuine MRAs. This is when the mods decide the those users don't reflect well on the community and its image.
/r/MensRights04/07/14 03:36 AM
2

You said you didn't know of any shelters run by the government which is why I mentioned it. You immediately jumped to the conclusion that I think it's wrong before I even said anything about which just tells me you know it's wrong too. So do I really need to explain why not giving men equal access to these services is wrong?
/r/MensRights30/06/14 03:42 AM
2

Oh so you feel like arrogantly preaching to us on a topic that you know very little about? You can look up the Violence Against Women Act as a start to remedying your complete ignorance.
/r/MensRights30/06/14 03:06 AM
7

Yeah I meant to say persuasion. My bad.
/r/MensRights30/06/14 02:14 AM
43

Feminists don't give a shit about stopping actual rape. That's why they get mad about legitimate rape prevention advice, make excuses for women that don't report rapists to the police instead of telling them that they're obligated to, and trivialize it by giving the label to really innocuous actions. Why do you think they exaggerate rape stats so much? If you notice though feminists are completely on board with talking about how to stop rape if it revolves around stereotyping and profiling men, …
/r/MensRights30/06/14 02:09 AM
165

If it's at all feminist influenced it could go something like: "If you don't get enthusiastic consent that's rape. If she's had a drop of alcohol that's rape. If there is any form of deception or persuasion leading up to the act that's rape. Telling sex related jokes contributes to rape culture."
/r/MensRights30/06/14 01:07 AM
3

First world women are oppressed because of the way you think female CEOs are viewed? You're off your fucking rocker.
/r/MensRights26/06/14 09:39 PM
6

lol I don't believe that for a second
/r/MensRights26/06/14 09:37 PM
3

We don't think any of that is true. That's why we're not feminists.
/r/MensRights26/06/14 09:36 PM
18

why is it wrong to cut off a piece of a baby's penis for no reason? How is this even a question? I see no reason why not That's not how works. You need to give a damn good reason to do it, not ask for reasons not to do it. Your parents doing it to you isn't good enough of one.
/r/MensRights26/06/14 05:27 PM
1

I'd love to hear what feminists have to say about this. Someone want to post this on /r/askfeminists?
/r/MensRights26/06/14 03:19 PM
2

Both are equally as bad When's the last time a woman was seen as a threat to other peoples' safety for being a slut?
/r/MensRights26/06/14 03:13 PM
3

It just seems like they want to make it easier to attack and jail men they deem unfit for reproduction by expanding the definition of rape and lowering or even reversing the standard of evidence. Rape is the tool to do it because most people still see as something only men can do.
/r/MensRights24/06/14 02:56 AM
1

you both want the same thing No. MRAs want equal rights and treatment by the government and the law. Feminists want a twisted Animal Farm or Harrison Bergeron sort of equality.
/r/MensRights24/06/14 02:46 AM
5

This is why feminists claim we live in a "rape culture", or in other words, a society that condones rape. Because they have a fucked up idea of what constitutes as rape that is incongruent with the the already widespread established definition.
/r/MensRights24/06/14 02:30 AM
3

Feminists are the ones who are actively fighting for and representing LGBT's. What makes you say that? You got a significant portion of them that openly hate trans people, then I'd bet that a lot of them also secretly hate gay men for not be a slave to pussy. It's just another cause that they try to co-opt because they don't have anything real to complain about. Women face comparatively little discrimination for being homo/bisexual.
/r/MensRights23/06/14 12:28 AM
1

What they mean when they say that is that they refuse to accept that rape is at all about sexual gratification. That's so they can immediately swat down any suggestions about helping men get laid like legalizing prostitution in order to decrease incidences of rape. Because forcible sex...isn't about sex! According to them.
/r/MensRights21/06/14 09:30 PM
3

You remember that senator that made those comments about 'legitimate' rape? That's pretty much the heart of rape culture: That only a small subset of actual rapes are seen as rape, while many rapes are dismissed as 'sex she regretted' or whatever. Except the vast majority of the time this concept of a rape culture only applies to male victims. He just said something about women what many people have been saying and still believe about male victims of rape--that if they really didn't want it ther…
/r/MensRights21/06/14 03:23 AM
9

There are some minor exceptions to this, but you can't deny history has not been that bad for men. WTF? You just listed all the exceptions to life being SHITTY for men. Do you really think the majority of men owned land, had harems, important careers, and participated fully in government? NO, JACKASS. The majority of men did backbreaking manual labor just to feed their wife and kids who stayed safe at home. What you are doing is making your own definition of what feminism That's what you're doin…
/r/MensRights21/06/14 03:15 AM
5

Women are harassed too often Women complain about harassment too often and construe the most innocuous actions as such. Women are raped too often Rape is the lowest its been in decades. Some girls have FGM preformed on them without their consent FGM is illegal in pretty much all of the civilized world. Women are underrepresented in Politics Oh right I forgot mainstream political discussions are always talking about men's issues and never women's issues. OH WAIT NO THEY'RE NOT. There are very few…
/r/MensRights21/06/14 03:05 AM
0

I'm not defending her. Why are you here then? I just find it amusing that so many people like you get so worked up over her. What did I say to make you think I'm worked up about this? how feeeemales should stay out of computer games What do you even mean by "stay out" exactly? Do you think that we don't want women to play video games? That's absurd. I'm pretty sure nobody really thinks women shouldn't play video games. What people don't want though is women like you and Anita who don't even play…
/r/MensRights18/06/14 12:46 AM
2

A lot of is just them slightly exaggerating their positions so they can create an air of plausible deniability and say "oh that was a clearly a joke" when they find they can't defend themselves. It's a defense tactic. They think no one will suspect their misandry if they're just really over the top with it. Honestly that can work sometimes for some people but their execution is just so horrible that they make themselves really transparent.
/r/MensRights17/06/14 03:17 AM
1

You can worry about whatever you want but I'll say one thing. Women fear being raped more because there's more of an instinctual revulsion. It's the female's genetic duty, not the male's, to control reproduction and ensure the fitness of their offspring. Even today women have complete control over that it's not something that they will likely ever give up.
/r/MensRights17/06/14 02:17 AM
3

Judging by their posting history it was a completely serious reply. Which makes it even more funny.
/r/MensRights17/06/14 02:12 AM
-11

Why do you jackasses feel compelled to defend this woman in every corner of the internet? The purpose of posting it here is so that we can have a discussion about it with like-minded individuals. If we wanted to talk about it with people like you we'd just go to one of the many other places it was posted.
/r/MensRights17/06/14 02:05 AM
3

Well when the "opposing side" has such major influence in government and news outlets, it's kind of hard to ignore them even when talking about positive action.
/r/MensRights14/06/14 03:24 AM
3

I think the idea of LPS isn't egalitarian enough. Think about it. If women can decide unilaterally whose offspring gets a chance at life, wouldn't the most "equal" outcome be that men have that same right? And if you want to object with something about her body her choice, what about ending the infant's life as soon as it's born? Really it's most equal if a baby can only be born when both parents agree to have a kid together. LPS still allows the woman to give birth to a child without the father…
/r/MensRights14/06/14 03:22 AM
2

Well, this says it's affects more women: http://www.thehotline.org/is-this-abuse/statistics/ Those stats, like I said, just focus on a very specific subset of crime that society is a lot less willing to recognize men as victims of. They just prove that cultural bias, they don't measure how often incidences of those crimes actually happen because that would be impossible. But even if we pretended that bias didn't exist, if we added up every single victim of any kind of violent crime according to …
/r/MensRights14/06/14 12:28 AM
2

this happens to women much more often What does? The only form of violence you can even act like for a second that women are more often victims of is a very specific type that 1) happens much less often and 2) male victims are treated much less seriously so it's much harder to measure how often it happens to them. So...not really. catcalling is a POWER move Catcalling is a natural consequence of having power. Rich and famous people aren't bothered by strangers all the time because they're being …
/r/MensRights12/06/14 01:34 AM
59

No, of course you are. Just so long as it's a man. People only bring up how big someone is when it's a woman so they can act like they're not sexist.
/r/MensRights11/06/14 12:46 AM
133

Tl;dr when women are attacked, it's always worse. Feminist "equality" for you, everyone. It's a stupid argument anyway even if one were to assume that every single woman is smaller and weaker than every single man. BECAUSE THINGS LIKE GUNS, KNIVES, AND PEPPER SPRAY EXIST, YOU DUMB FUCK. If someone comes at you at with a weapon, it doesn't matter how big they are, it's always equally scary. And if someone threatens to come at you with a weapon as big as the police, that's about as scary as you ca…
/r/MensRights11/06/14 12:05 AM
1

Wishful thinking.
/r/MensRights08/06/14 07:19 AM
6

Where you went wrong is assuming that they're interested in discussing anything in good faith. Even that first reply admits they're not. Just let them have their echo chamber so they can remain as sheltered as they want to be. If they really wanted to talk to us they could easily do it here and they know it. They do it all the time whenever they think they have a legitimate point to present.
/r/MensRights08/06/14 07:10 AM
1

To put it simply it's just a huge conflict of interests. By now I think it's clear that a lot of these issues aren't going to be resolved diplomatically so it's going to end up with might making right so to speak. Feminists are already on the offensive by attacking public conferences set up specifically to discuss men's issues. They're sending death threats, doxing and harassing people, and pulling fire alarms. They'll continue to do things like this as long as they can get away with them. And r…
/r/MensRights08/06/14 07:01 AM
6

Basically what they're assuming here is that any man is a rapist as soon as a woman says so. Which is ridiculous. Our justice system does not revolve around the principle of "guilty until proven innocent" as much as these psychotic man haters want it to be. So first ask yourself how they would even track unreported rapes. It's through surveys done by organizations that aren't directly associated with law enforcement most likely but those are known to use very broad definitions of rape that even …
/r/MensRights08/06/14 06:43 AM
1

Okay...you can do that, but that doesn't mean it's going to change anything.
/r/MensRights08/06/14 06:16 AM
2

Not going to work. Society generally holds a lot of contempt for vulnerable and weak men because they're seen as useless. Men are valued for their utility and if they show they can't provide anything for anyone they're considered scumbags.
/r/MensRights07/06/14 05:22 PM
1

The only realistic way to get more women into dangerous occupations that I can think of is to start some sort of draft. Hardly anyone really wants to do those jobs in the first place, so all the "encouragement" in the world wouldn't do much. We'd just have to say to women "tough shit, suck it up" like we've told every man throughout the history of ever who wanted to work to support themselves and/or their family and had no other reasonable alternative. Otherwise women will continue to make smart…
/r/MensRights05/06/14 01:12 AM
3

Men don't often talk about being afraid because it's a sign of weakness. They tend to be more interested in defending their pride and ego than expressing concerns about their safety. So of course feminists take advantage of this general difference between men and women in vocalizing fear so they can jump to conclusions that of course women's fears are legitimate and since men hardly ever complain there's no reason to give a fuck about them.
/r/MensRights01/06/14 02:43 AM
1

Well the thing is that they will stretch their interpretation of the rules to fit anything they don't like. Then they go on and grant plenty of leniency to users they do like. I gave up on that place, it's fucking pointless. They obviously don't like me and banned me permanently for some pretty benign comments. Something that they haven't done for posters who have had many more of their comments break the rules.
/r/MensRights30/05/14 05:02 AM
3

All these stats are likely true if you just go by reports from the DoJ. But they just show women's privilege though. Rich and powerful people are also involved in a lot less direct violence because for one, most of the time they want to inflict harm on others they send others to do their bidding for them. They just hire some mercenaries or hitmen, or if they have the power then they get the help of their nation's armed forces. It's similar for women, they either inspire a pathetic white knight t…
/r/MensRights30/05/14 02:07 AM
23

No it's not. It's talking about what percentage of people convicted of rape are men. It just shows the bias of the courts more than anything though.
/r/MensRights30/05/14 01:48 AM
1

You do realize a random blog post isn't a source right? A source for what? Do you think the act itself is going to admit it's discriminatory? The blog post quotes relevant bits and explains why they are. saying that because certain sections of the act specifically target women makes the act discriminatory is bull Oh I see you're just arguing for the sake of it now. WHAT THE FUCK DO YOU THINK DISCRIMINATION EVEN IS? It's treating two groups of people differently unfairly. So if you set up a law t…
/r/MensRights29/05/14 03:04 AM
1

He asked for laws that MRAs have lobbied for and passed. Not some law that some random guy on here agrees with. That's not even close to the same thing. Except that said act is not discriminatory against men. It's gender neutral. No it's not. http://breakingtheglasses.blogspot.com/2013/01/vawa-is-not-like-that.html
/r/MensRights29/05/14 02:10 AM
1

Oh and I forgot to address the bullshit about the wage gap but that's just average pay between men and women. Of course men are pressured to work and earn more by women because they hate poor men. That's discrimination against men, not women.
/r/MensRights29/05/14 02:08 AM
1

That's all you've got? Pathetic. Even for a feminist. discrimination in the work place when it comes to wages and promotions Oh really, tell me how much discrimination in the work place women suffer. Tell me exactly what you base this claim on and how old you are? I doubt you've ever even had a fucking job if you seriously say this shit. Most workplaces are all about catering to female sensibilities nowadays. HR departments are almost solely comprised of women and they control the workplace envi…
/r/MensRights29/05/14 02:07 AM
0

I don't care what he thinks it means. You and I both know that's not what it means.
/r/MensRights29/05/14 01:41 AM
-1

Abortion laws Are you fucking serious right now, jackass? How the hell do you plan on proving that MRAs are responsible for any law involving abortion? Now what laws have "feminists" rallied for that discriminates against men? The Violence Against Women Act.
/r/MensRights29/05/14 01:28 AM
1

tell me you aren't one of those people who think things are worse for men than for women They are. Now try and argue against that and we'll see who's really so logical and rational. My prediction is you have nothing and you prove yourself to be irrational one here.
/r/MensRights29/05/14 01:24 AM
0

I believe that women deserve the right to vote, access to abortion and birth control, no discrimination, etc. Is that too feminist? I'm sure most people here agree with that too but you know damn well that's not what qualifies someone as a feminist.
/r/MensRights29/05/14 01:20 AM
2

And why do you keep trying to persuade them on the internet? Don't you realize it's useless? It's not entirely useless. I would still probably agree with most of the shit feminists say if I had never seen any counterarguments their crap. If I get at least one person out there to change their mind about these things it's not useless, and I'm pretty sure I've done that already.
/r/MensRights29/05/14 01:18 AM
2

Women are taught to be held responsible for their rape/assault What? Women are occasionally told they are responsible for their own personal saftey to an extent, that's not the same thing no matter how much you try to conflate the two. and to fear men Well feminists often teach women to fear men so I don't see why you associate yourself with feminism if you have a problem with that. Men aren't held accountability (remember, a vast majority of rapists are men) What the hell are you even talking a…
/r/MensRights27/05/14 02:44 AM
1

they are still socially seen as superior to women "Men's weakness is their facade of strength; women's strength is their facade of weakness." Playing the weak and helpless victim is often how women get what they want, and it's certainly a tactic feminists are a fan of, despite how much they blame this perception on "patriarchy". Men may be perceived as superior in general in some aspects, like physically for instance, but women do tend to be thought of as morally superior, and more deserving of …
/r/MensRights27/05/14 02:20 AM
2

You're the one who brought up actual rape.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 12:04 AM
3

Of course women don't want to be raped, but it's a common fantasy for women to have a guy she's attracted to basically force themselves on her in an ideal situation.
/r/MensRights26/05/14 10:06 PM
1

You'd have a point if feminists weren't the ones that started the trend of using "not all" as a rebuttal to generalizations about women or feminists in the first place. So as it stands feminists just prove themselves to be shameless hypocrites yet again.
/r/MensRights26/05/14 09:38 PM
5

That's not even fucking close and I'm fucking sick of idiots acting like generalizing a political group (feminists) is the same thing as generalizing a birth group (men). We don't like it when they say "not all feminists" because it's just a pathetic attempt at deflecting criticism. Feminists don't like when people say "not all men" because they are a bunch of man haters who don't like it when their attempts at stereotyping men are countered. It's as simple as that.
/r/MensRights26/05/14 09:33 PM
3

In almost all cases, it is the man That's false and you're just making shit up because of your sexist prejudices. Get the fuck out of here with that shit.
/r/MensRights26/05/14 06:15 PM
2

There is a sidebar full of information for you if you actually bothered to give a shit but I don't think you do. I don't even understand your reasoning here either. You see a couple news stories about men killing women and your conclusion here is what exactly? That only men are murderers or something? There was this recent story about a woman shooting at a man for rejecting her sexual advances. Is that indicative of a culture of "female entitlement"? Mainstream news just hardly ever reports on w…
/r/MensRights26/05/14 06:14 PM
4

The fear mongering about rape culture and shit also feeds into that too. It gets them to think guys everywhere not only want to fuck them, but want to do it so bad they're even willing to do it by force. Wouldn't even be surprised if for a lot of these people who rant about that shit it's secretly a fantasy for them.
/r/MensRights26/05/14 05:35 PM
5

No, it's only normal for extremely privileged people like women and the rich to be afraid of strangers in completely normal situations like being in an elevator or cab. The rich are always worried about getting robbed and narcissistic women are worried of getting raped because their ego is so huge they think everyone wants to fuck them.
/r/MensRights26/05/14 05:27 PM
3

I think that denying the other side has valid points gets you nowhere I didn't do that. I think women have legitimate issues but like I said I just don't think they compare if we're really going to try to start a pissing contest. Is there anything you can think of that can't be argued as something that's just the result of women's choices then though?
/r/MensRights25/05/14 08:27 PM
3

My position is first off there is no objective measure to quantify which gender actually has it worse. Because you can maybe point at some areas where women have it worse and then some where men do, but then who gets to decide which is more important? If we did compare all the issues and tried to determine that though, in my opinion the most important shit men are more likely to get fucked over by. Men are incarcerated far more and even get harsher sentences for the same crimes, men work all the…
/r/MensRights25/05/14 08:06 PM
2

1) men have it better than women in our society Uh, no. Fuck you.
/r/MensRights25/05/14 07:43 PM
28

if only we could elect a man president Oh if only the president could parrot feminist talking points...
/r/MensRights25/05/14 07:36 PM
3

straight white man Oh you have to dress up "men" a little because men are the victims of violence more often than women so you know you couldn't get away with pretending they're straight up not.
/r/MensRights25/05/14 07:25 PM
11

Feminism is all about hating men. Some are just more honest about it than others. Name me one feminist "issue" that isn't all about attacking men. They even manage to do it with things that aren't about men at all like for instance with abortion by trying to characterize it as an issue of "men trying to control women's bodies" even though polls say that just as many women who are against it as men. Or what about when they say shit like "Homophobia is the fear that gay men will treat you the way …
/r/MensRights25/05/14 05:00 PM
0

They're related since they're both groups for men talking about how to get what they want and to man haters of course it's all the same to them and something that they dislike a lot.
/r/MensRights25/05/14 02:07 PM
5

In life there's always going to be winners and losers. This guy was clearly a loser, and he realized that and lashed out. This guy is being associated with MRAs simply because he acknowledged that life can be extremely unfair to males, which is something that we also want to draw attention to. So what people are trying to accomplish is making everyone else view anyone that complains about the struggles of manhood as a huge threat to society. That is why people may think or want others to think t…
/r/MensRights25/05/14 06:38 AM
5

the feminists you decry are actually your allies if you want to make a positive difference in the lives of men Okay instead of just laughing at you for thinking anyone here will believe this, I'm going to give you the benefit of the doubt for a second and assume you're being genuine. What positive differences for men do you have in mind exactly, and how can feminists can help with that?
/r/MensRights23/05/14 04:30 AM
-1

Are you eight years old?
/r/MensRights22/05/14 10:53 PM
1

Because usually there's no real basis for fear of another race Oh so you're saying there's usually a real basis for fear of the other sex then? How the fuck does that make sense? and it stems from a sense of racial supremacy That's just one of the sources, which can also sometimes be the reason some people justify their sexism too. But a lot of people are racist because they fear blacks too, you know. Either because they've been attacked by some before or because they just can't control their in…
/r/MensRights21/05/14 12:24 AM
5

You said the men and women in question might have fear and apprehension about being around people of the same gender as the person who abused them How is that not an argument to justify segregation due to prejudice? You have also yet to elaborate on what exactly are these different needs between genders that should be met.
/r/MensRights19/05/14 09:55 PM
4

Okay so you want to cater to peoples' prejudices that they may have against certain birth groups. Why just stop at sex though? Why not also segregate by race? Oh wait, because the civil rights act. Guess you are just guilty of what MRAs are so often accused of which is being a reactionary anti-progress asshole by trying to repeal anti-discriminatory legislation and supporting the same kinds of things white supremacists do.
/r/MensRights19/05/14 09:13 PM
4

Oh so you're just hung up on the part that mentions discrimination. And since you've decided that it's not discrimination, it doesn't count. Well that's not how it works, jackass. For one, segregation is just another word for separation, which you'd have figured out if you didn't decide to selectively ignore the entry right after it: "the separation for special treatment or observation of individuals or items from a larger group". Also you can't just decide something isn't discrimination just be…
/r/MensRights19/05/14 09:02 PM
4

Look up the word in a dictionary sometime, sweetie.
/r/MensRights19/05/14 08:31 PM
5

There are many different arguments that could be made for and against segregating those things that have nothing to do with each other of course. But all I wanted to do was point out the typical feminists' lack of consistency and principles here. For one moment they pretend to be opposed to segregation purely for ethical reasons and, and the very next moment defend segregation for practical ones. I guess you AMR tards really don't care about being seen as complete hypocrites at all.
/r/MensRights19/05/14 07:59 PM
6

I'm not the one arguing in favor of segregation here. What the hell are you talking about?
/r/MensRights19/05/14 07:50 PM
9

So "separate but equal" is fine? As long as you get to decide when it's appropriate? Okay. Remind me again who is supposed to have more in common with white supremacists?
/r/MensRights19/05/14 07:03 PM
2

women need services tailored specifically to them Why? Why is homelessness a gendered issue?
/r/MensRights19/05/14 06:50 PM
5

have we ever tried separate but equal before? Oh look the feminist pretends to be opposed to segregation for a second but then probably still supports all kinds of woman only "safe spaces" like DV shelters and gyms.
/r/MensRights19/05/14 06:44 PM
1

I already see people do things like that in this sub. Instead of posting screenshots of conversations they had on facebook, they'll just tell a little story about it sometimes. Do you want to ban those types of posts too?
/r/MensRights12/05/14 01:07 PM
1

What types? Screenshots of facebook posts? Then people will just start typing them into text posts. Is that your easy solution? Or do you want to ban text posts too?
/r/MensRights12/05/14 01:20 AM
2

Who? MRAs? I don't see how asking that the definition of rape stay reasonable should have any bearing on how male victims of rape are treated anyway. I don't know exactly what the fuck you're even trying to get at.
/r/MensRights11/05/14 05:14 AM
1

That's a problem with reddit in general that isn't specific to this sub. There's no easy solution to it.
/r/MensRights11/05/14 04:41 AM
3

Because some people are more interested in the truth than trying to come up with sensationalist talking points. Also there isn't much public sympathy for male victims.
/r/MensRights11/05/14 04:39 AM
6

The better question is why feminists try to exaggerate rape so much. How often does the one in six stat get brought up? Rarely. It's almost always about often women get raped. How rape is so rampant and women should be afraid of men because of this. Feminists go on about rape so much so they can stir up fear and hatred of men.
/r/MensRights11/05/14 02:24 AM
2

Why don't you just downvote them? Why does everything you don't like have to be banned? Sure posts like that aren't usually quality content, but sometimes useful discussion can be had in topics like that.
/r/MensRights11/05/14 01:30 AM
3

What's interesting to me is that pretty much NO ONE seems to support making that sub a default. Not any of the subscribers, and not even anyone who doesn't like the place. So why did it happen?
/r/MensRights10/05/14 03:04 AM
1

because someone else takes a cut of that money, so they have reason take the most they can
/r/MensRights09/05/14 08:22 PM
4

Point is there has never been any sort of mass extermination of women like there has been of men. So I just thougt it was funny that people who don't accept crap about the supposed historical oppression of women are being compared to Holocaust deniers.
/r/MensRights08/05/14 04:43 PM
17

Yes, let's not forget about all those poor women who were killed in wars. Oh wait...
/r/MensRights08/05/14 01:20 PM
8

People usually only get mad at things they know are true.
/r/MensRights08/05/14 01:17 PM
0

I think men are capable of deciding for themselves what are the most important men's rights issues and what they "should be" doing. Please don't come here and insult us by establishing yourself as a detractor and at the same time attempt to boss us around and focus our attention on what you want us to, thank you.
/r/MensRights07/05/14 02:28 AM
1

Can you get a ceremonial marriage but not a marriage license so that you can be together but not worry about alimony if something happens? As far as I'm aware, yes. However, you're right to still be cautious and should still try to do some more research on the topic. At the very least just make sure you don't live in a state with common law marriage.
/r/MensRights06/05/14 02:26 AM
3

If you live together and act like a couple sooner or later you will be seen as defacto by the law. Common law marriage doesn't exist in every state. So, not necessarily true.
/r/MensRights06/05/14 02:23 AM
4

The solution is for you to stop lying and claiming you are for gender equality when you're not. You want freedom for women and obligations for men. Justify it however you want but don't try to pass that off as equality.
/r/MensRights05/05/14 11:42 PM
1

So you are pro choice for women but not for men. And you pretend to care about gender equality. Go fuck yourself.
/r/MensRights05/05/14 07:00 PM
1

The argument can only hold some ground if the dress code was more strict for women, but I seriously doubt it is. This is simply perpetuating rape culture. When they randomly throw in buzzwords like this it's just comical and makes it seem like a parody.
/r/MensRights28/04/14 08:58 AM
3

Advocate for harsher sentences for women? You just hate women. Advocate for more leniency on men? You are supporting criminals.
/r/MensRights28/04/14 08:54 AM
4

They are really adept at spinning things to make them seem like what they want. There was also this article making fun of them but they somehow managed to interpret it as the writer actually holding that view but just being a bit over the top with it. How delusional can one be? http://www.theonion.com/articles/us-advances-to-womens-hockey-hey-get-the-fuck-back,35309/ Also, if I remember correctly, there was one about a guy acting like the typical "strong woman, I'm too good for everyone and they…
/r/MensRights22/04/14 02:00 AM
1

Although that gosh darn hip-hop isnt helping. Wat
/r/MensRights08/04/14 07:10 PM
97

men are still pressured by gender norms to be high earners Men are pressured BY WOMEN OBVIOUSLY FOR FUCK'S SAKE. If a man wants a decent chance at finding a woman, he knows he has to make good money. 64% of women say that want a man that earns more, and NONE say they want a man that earns less. Of course feminists will never address this though, they will just place blame on nebulous abstractions.
/r/MensRights08/04/14 01:33 AM
0

Um, who cares. Let them write whatever the fuck they want however they want on feminist related stuff. It's when they start changing articles that have nothing to do with feminism that something should be done.
/r/MensRights02/04/14 12:17 AM
2

No it's an example of male privilege because it is assuming men are stronger and more competent DURRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR
/r/MensRights23/03/14 01:34 PM
-3

And why exactly is it important that people know you're a woman right now?
/r/MensRights21/03/14 01:52 PM
7

They're right. It's not about women, it's about hating men.
/r/MensRights21/03/14 01:49 PM
3

Well first off I hate how everyone who complains about slut shaming refuses to acknowledge the reasons people even do it in the first place. "There's nothing wrong with having sex!" Yeah, and there's nothing really wrong with fedoras either but redditors still act like anyone who wears one is scum of the earth. It's not that the behavior itself is bad, but the stereotypes that revolve around the type of person that engages in that behavior. Second, I think the gripes about there being a "slut/st…
/r/MensRights20/03/14 04:52 AM
6

When you grow up and stop being a teenager you're going to be embarrassed as fuck when you remember all this shit.
/r/MensRights20/03/14 04:34 AM
1

Wage gap stats aren't technically wrong most of the time, they're just misleading. Looking at average income between men and women alone isn't enough to prove any kind of discrimination.
/r/MensRights20/03/14 04:17 AM
17

It's amazing how they can post shit like this while also saying that false rape accusations are rare. Every rape accusation is true, and if there wasn't a conviction then that must mean the guy got away with it, not that the accuser was lying.
/r/MensRights19/03/14 05:28 PM
2

Even if she means "women are inherently valuable" it does not automatically mean men aren't because the statement in no way excluded the possibility of men being inherently valuable too. That's fucking fucktarded and you know it. That reasoning could be used to defend any sexist statement then. women are stupid! "that's sexist" no it's not! they didn't say anything about men. they could also think that men are stupid which would make it not sexist!
/r/MensRights19/03/14 06:09 AM
9

Yeah I'm sure that makes up for all your sexism. Keep telling yourself that.
/r/MensRights17/03/14 02:10 AM
11

Why only tell your friends co-workers? Tell everyone you know in your community. Shout from the roof tops what a righteous gender warrior you are!
/r/MensRights17/03/14 01:39 AM
17

Yeah, she said it in another thread on here here a few hours earlier which is how I knew. But if you check her posting history she is an AMR regular and I'm sure posts all sorts of other horrible shit all the time in an even less sarcastic manner. Not like I'm surprised that there are people like that who teach children, but it's still horrible every time I see an example. And she even has the audacity to come to a place like this and brag about it? #thisiswhatprivilegelookslike
/r/MensRights16/03/14 11:57 PM
21

Thank you!!! I'm really getting tired of men -- particularly white men -- getting upset and complaining about how I treat them. People like you shouldn't be teaching children. You're disgusting.
/r/MensRights16/03/14 09:42 PM
4

There's always going to be interest where there's money to be made. People can profit from abortion clinics, so abortion is legal. Certain people like those who collect child support stand to gain from that too. Self interest always trumps abstract moral principles.
/r/MensRights15/03/14 05:59 PM
0

I'm pretty sure the feminist movement today comprises mostly of people who generally keep to themselves and don't participate in misandry, i.e. people you don't hear about. Irrelevant, even if you could somehow prove that was true (you can't). What matters is that the most influential feminists in academia and political lobbies are misandrous. If you start painting people in broad, hateful strokes, you're going to turn into the thing you hate. Because generalizing men (a birth group) is totes th…
/r/MensRights15/03/14 05:51 PM
2

Fairly sure feminism has been the only organised movement to actually tackle this problem. Feel free to provide, like...any evidence for that. Don't know why this is on a gender stereotype- reinforcing, woman hating subreddit. Well this IS on here and not any of the feminist subs. Maybe you have some misconceptions that you need to re-evaluate.
/r/MensRights15/03/14 05:45 PM
6

It's okay to be prudiced against men because they're privileged. That's their argument.
/r/MensRights14/03/14 05:07 PM
1

And no doesn't always mean no?
/r/MensRights14/03/14 04:59 PM
2

Saying something doesn't automatically make it true.
/r/MensRights14/03/14 01:49 PM
1

and that is...?
/r/MensRights12/03/14 06:41 PM
-1

Maybe he did but your entitlement drove him away.
/r/MensRights12/03/14 05:04 AM
1

So what are your thoughts on guys who expect sex after buying a girl dinner?
/r/MensRights12/03/14 05:03 AM
4

If he is really such a "molestation apologist", then how come every time he's asked to clarify his views on incest, he explicitly states he does not support it?
/r/MensRights11/03/14 10:40 PM
7

some We're back to where he's simply reporting his observations. How many fucking quotes do you want to throw at me? This is pointless. You obviously just want to hate the guy. It's not even like anyone cares about the research he did on that subject except for people like you who want to use it to discredit the rest of his body of his work. But since he is pretty much the most reasonable voice on men's issues, you realize you can't publicly criticize most of what he says without looking like co…
/r/MensRights11/03/14 02:25 PM
8

he claims that's a misquote/typo from an interview and that he said generally, not genitally.
/r/MensRights11/03/14 06:09 AM
2

Okay regardless of whether or not an article about that was even up at one point, it's still not a popular MRA position. So please don't act like it is especially when you can't even provide any evidence for such a claim.
/r/MensRights11/03/14 03:45 AM
6

Yeah, not all feminists are SRSers, but all SRSers are feminists.
/r/MensRights11/03/14 03:43 AM
5

I don't think of it so much as paranoia but rather an extreme manifestation of narcissism. They like to think of themselves as so attractive that guys everywhere want to bang them so bad that they're even willing to rape them.
/r/MensRights11/03/14 03:38 AM
4

SRSer is basically synonymous with feminist to me.
/r/MensRights11/03/14 03:33 AM
2

Oh so you're just pretending you never did that now?
/r/MensRights11/03/14 03:31 AM
1

men should have an equivalent to abortion, meaning the excusal of parental responsibility, only from a financial standpoint Correct. This is a popular MRA position, not the shit about men having a say in abortions. You're talking about how others shouldn't misrepresent MRAs but you just tried to do that...
/r/MensRights11/03/14 02:46 AM
8

It's for SRSers. Like you.
/r/MensRights11/03/14 02:20 AM
1

I see you can't provide a link. What the hell were you even trying to accomplish with that obvious lie?
/r/MensRights11/03/14 01:21 AM
8

I can't tell the difference between an observation and an endorsement because I am a moron
/r/MensRights11/03/14 01:19 AM
10

I'm not a regular there, no. But every time I have seen a thread in there it was basically that.
/r/MensRights11/03/14 01:15 AM
14

Yup, that sub seems like it would be perfect for the type of feminist who wants to peddle revisionist history crap. The premise is basically SRS with a focus on "herstory". I would have guessed that's what it's like before I even saw this thread.
/r/MensRights10/03/14 07:04 PM
3

that's the official position there link?
/r/MensRights09/03/14 09:17 PM
4

/r/cringe
/r/MensRights09/03/14 07:11 PM
6

a large subgroup within the MRM seeks to assert father's rights over a pregnancy, rejecting the idea that a pregnant woman has sole control over what happens with her body. This isn't really a popular MRA position either. You also fail at accurate representation. Why didn't he address them as females? Just because this is something feminists get butthurt about doesn't mean that MRAs prefer to use that term.
/r/MensRights09/03/14 07:10 PM
60

I really don't want MRAs to cultivate a reputation, like social justice warriors, for being shrill, humorless complainers This. I didn't see it, but if it is a complete strawman of MRA positions then there's nothing to get mad about. If anything, we should be glad that even the idea of a men's rights activist is getting more mainstream attention. People will get curious and see what's up for themselves.
/r/MensRights09/03/14 06:42 AM
24

There are other sites such as the redpill which I would have thought would be far more offensive to their views. They have a sub for them too. /r/thebluepill
/r/MensRights06/03/14 07:34 PM
2

Well you already tried by quoting wikipedia, didn't you? It's not like I don't know the stupid shit you believe in, I just don't believe it accurately describes modern society. The term was made up and used for historical contexts until retards like you hijacked and basically turned it into a conspiracy theory about men oppressing women.
/r/MensRights06/03/14 03:26 AM
4

If the new definition of rape says that sex while drunk is rape due to an inability of consent Just so everyone is clear, that's not actually true according to law. This is just another thing that feminists started in their attempt to expand the definition of rape.
/r/MensRights06/03/14 01:02 AM
203

feminists demand that women have equal rights No they don't even do that. Every time you point out an equal rights issue to where men are disadvantaged they start shouting things like "false equivalence!" "that's different!" "you hate women!"
/r/MensRights06/03/14 12:57 AM
3

Are you going to answer how patriarchy isn't hidden or not? Who is admitting to supporting patriarchy? Since you initiated this conversation by implying its not hidden. I'm not going to let you derail.
/r/MensRights05/03/14 10:47 PM
3

Yeah, widely recognized like jews running hollywood too, right? It's not a a conspiracy if it's so "obvious" to people like you. And it's not hidden just because you can't find anyone claiming to uphold it... wait how does that work again?
/r/MensRights05/03/14 07:53 PM
3

Who the hell is claiming to actively promote patriarchy?
/r/MensRights05/03/14 06:28 PM
8

number 7 especially BTW the conspiracy is all that patriarchy shit you AMR morons
/r/MensRights05/03/14 01:54 AM
6

1 in 4 women will be raped or sexually-assaulted in her lifetime Haha. Let's ignore for a second that this stat is obviously overinflated. How come these clowns only seem to care about shit that they can convince themselves and others is really common? As if it's like the only thing that matters? Let's say for a second that rape was about as common as they think false reports of rapes are. BUT, rape wasn't even considered crime really, and the only people that were ever punished for doing it jus…
/r/MensRights05/03/14 01:47 AM
2

No. Feminists are the constant underdog. Because they said so. Really I can't wrap my head around how they can still convince themselves of that.
/r/MensRights03/03/14 03:36 AM
7

They've been here for a while. I don't even get the point of that sub, it's not like they've all been banned from here. Guess they just love talking shit about others in a place where the people they're talking about can't directly respond.
/r/MensRights03/03/14 03:34 AM
3

If you actually read the whole thing here, it says this: The CPS is a household survey primarily used to collect employment data. The sample universe for the basic CPS consists of the resident civilian non-institutionalized population of the United States. People in institutions, such as prisons, long-term care hospitals, and nursing homes, are not eligible to be interviewed in the CPS. Students living in dormitories are included in the estimates only if information about them is reported in an …
/r/MensRights28/02/14 01:44 AM
6

Like, holy fuck why don't you see patriarchy jesus christ. Yes, I guess patriarchy is everywhere when you get to just make up shit in your head. How about this: the girlfriend is a strong independent woman who doesn't have to put up with an abusive boyfriend bossing her around, and the boyfriend is an abusive asshole if he doesn't respect her wishes when she tells him what to do. Like, OMG WHY DON'T U SEE MATRIARCHY JEBUS CHRIST?
/r/MensRights24/02/14 02:41 PM
2

I made a comment one time asking about how all men being priveleged wasn't a generalization and it just got deleted.
/r/MensRights21/02/14 06:41 PM
5

Anyone who says /r/askwomen doesn't censor Who has said that? Not even they will deny it.
/r/MensRights21/02/14 04:50 AM
6

They will delete posts for "graceless generalizations", but only the ones they don't like. Every negative generalization about men always stays up.
/r/MensRights21/02/14 04:49 AM
0

such as?
/r/MensRights21/02/14 01:15 AM
2

Why else would feminists, the supposed champions of women's rights, generally not like the idea of legalized prostitution? Prostitution is arguable one of the last remaining women's rights issues today, but feminists don't have much to say about it because the majority of women benefit more from it being illegal.
/r/MensRights20/02/14 12:23 AM
3

I don't know. The idea of being "used" for sex is just so weird to me. Sex is supposed to be a mutual act of giving each other pleasure, but some women treat it like they are owed something for letting a man have sex with her. If you're going to be giving sex as a service, you should be clear as to what you expect the payment to be.
/r/MensRights17/02/14 09:35 PM
1

Who starts physically assaulting someone to get a sale?
/r/MensRights17/02/14 09:27 PM
1

click the other discussions tab at the top
/r/MensRights17/02/14 08:42 PM
0

they do those investigations even when women drop off babies How does that work? "Does the father agree with this?" "Uhhh, I don't know who/where the father is"
/r/MensRights17/02/14 08:39 PM
26

You get drinks if you're spending money gambling. Not really free.
/r/MensRights17/02/14 08:30 PM
11

r/AMR linked here and I think I can guess why. "Women get harassed and sexually assaulted at nightclubs though!" That was pretty much my experience last time I went to a strip club. A girl sat on my lap and then started getting aggressive with me when she realized I wasn't interested in a private lap dance (I was there with a group of friends and it was one of their birthdays). She started pinching my nipples and grabbing at my junk and calling me gay. It felt like she was on my lap doing this f…
/r/MensRights17/02/14 08:28 PM
1

same with reddit how is more users supposed to translate to less fake stories?
/r/MensRights17/02/14 05:11 PM
2

How does that not also apply to reddit?
/r/MensRights17/02/14 04:37 PM
11

Yeah. I'd argue that people are much more motivated to tell fake stories on reddit, because there's fake internet points involved.
/r/MensRights16/02/14 09:59 PM
37

Any random unverified story on a forum where anyone can post should be treated with the same amount of skepticism, INCLUDING ON REDDIT. Facebook and 4chan aren't the only places where people tell fake stories.
/r/MensRights16/02/14 06:43 PM
24

Yeah, what made me not believe it was her getting punished.
/r/MensRights16/02/14 06:39 PM
1

10% of all men are rapists, right? The fuck? Source? especially given that those 10% are just men who are really doing what they are biologically programmed to do anyway I guess what this is what feminists are getting at when they say shit like "teach men not to rape". They think men are natural born rapists. That shit and the mention of "social constructs" makes me suspect you're just some feminist asshole trying to make this subreddit look bad. Especially with the title.
/r/MensRights16/02/14 05:27 AM
2

Yes, exactly.
/r/MensRights15/02/14 04:21 PM
2

Not really, other than it being something that's always in the back of mind when considering romantic relationships with women.
/r/MensRights14/02/14 10:44 PM
3

I think if men ever get a little more control over reproduction, it will have a huge impact on social dynamics in general. Whether it be having the right to waive their parental rights, or having more reliable birth control in their own hands like RISUG. Women will actually have to make some effort to get what they want from men then.
/r/MensRights14/02/14 10:22 PM
7

the female monopoly on child rearing is something feminists fight against constantly When? Examples?
/r/MensRights14/02/14 10:15 PM
-8

You choose to be a christian, so I can rip on you? Yeah, that's pretty much how it works. Anything you choose to make part of your identity is fair game for criticism. If someone starts making fun of you for thinking the earth is only a few thousands years old, you don't get to just call them a bigot because it hurts your feelings. Well I mean you can, but people will just make fun of you for that too.
/r/MensRights14/02/14 08:52 PM
-12

bigoted towards Christians Being Christian is not a condition of birth, nor is any religion, ideology, or political group. THAT is why you can't be bigoted against them.
/r/MensRights14/02/14 06:01 PM
7

People (mainly SRS types) started saying that because it used to be that MRAs weren't instantly banned on the spot. Then the main mods quit and someone who was a lot more ban happy took over. But that person also happened to ban a few of the crazy types of feminists that really made feminists look bad, and they got all pissy about it and even made /r/wherearethefeminists. So that's why people still say that r/feminism is run by MRAs.
/r/MensRights14/02/14 12:17 AM
3

They can thank the Feminists of the past for their right to say these things. In other news, feminism is also credited with curing cancer. WTF? How do these people say such ridiculousness and convince themselves it's true?
/r/MensRights13/02/14 02:31 PM
5

So if it turned out that being forced to spend all day in a scorching hot field lacerating your hands on cotton plants to enrich the owner who sold your children to plantations hundreds of miles away somehow resulted in you living longer on average than that owner, would that mean it no longer counted as oppression? And how the fuck would that happen? People tend to live longer when they have higher standards of living, that's how it works and that's the point that's being made here. It definite…
/r/MensRights11/02/14 05:17 PM
8

Deal with the fact that many women... Wtf? Why do I have to deal with it? It's not my problem. What exactly do they even expect me to do?
/r/MensRights10/02/14 05:51 PM
5

She was saying men don't need a safe space because women get cat called. As if that's any better. But yeah, what I meant is that it should only be said as a joke because it doesn't make sense as a serious argument at all. Doesn't mean feminists won't try it of course. At least half their "arguments" are just some form of their attempt at being sarcastic or funny.
/r/MensRights09/02/14 03:43 AM
4

Feminists especially, but often women in general, argue that spaces dedicated to women are needed, but spaces dedicated to men aren't, based on the claim that the world is a man's space. This can only be used as a dumb joke though, not a serious argument against the creation of men's spaces. Because if everywhere else really was a space for men already, there shouldn't be a problem with one more where the only supposed difference would be it officially being declared one.
/r/MensRights09/02/14 12:05 AM
1

They were trying to point out how our society treats male and female victims differently, but then made it seem like they actually think men can't be raped. So it pissed off both the feminists who hate it when people point out double standards that favor women, and the people who realize it's wrong to thing men can't be raped, which explains the huge amount of downvotes.
/r/MensRights07/02/14 04:26 AM
1

Because the maker of a similar rating system for women went to jail. I honestly haven't seen that until this thread. THIS is what people should be getting upset about. Not the lulu app.
/r/MensRights06/02/14 02:57 AM
2

there is one. https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.dotUtil.chicklopedia
/r/MensRights06/02/14 12:37 AM
2

I really don't understand why people are upset about this. Women are going to gossip about men whether they have an app to aid them in doing so or not. I'm starting to suspect that the outrage is mainly motivated simply because it portrays these women in a negative light by leaving no room for denial about how some women do this. Just because feminists would be outraged if the genders were reversed does not mean we should act the same. They are lunatics and not people we should be modeling our b…
/r/MensRights06/02/14 12:36 AM
2

"Rape" - The implication here being that only men can rape, and they get away with it all the time. "Reproductive rights" - If a woman can't get an abortion that somehow makes it so that women are discriminated against here...because men can get abortions? No, that's not it... because viagra is covered by their insurance...or something. Yeah... Military service - Up until about a year ago, women were barred from SOF positions in the military. Wasn't really something too many people were complain…
/r/MensRights06/02/14 12:29 AM
13

Feminism is totally a monolithic entity devoted to breaking the balls of innocent and persecuted men worldwide. You said it not us.
/r/MensRights04/02/14 12:53 AM
15

Is there some law that I am unaware of where the mother must identify the father?
/r/MensRights01/02/14 08:13 PM
2

Different guy.
/r/MensRights01/02/14 05:06 PM
11

"BEST INTERESTS OF THE CHILD" Unless THE MOTHER is terminating the fetus, or putting the kid up for adoption, or leaving it at a safe haven...and if the father did any of those things against the mother's consent, then it is a crime. Never mind that she can do all of those things without the father's consent. So yeah, basically the mother can do anything she wants, but we're still supposed to believe that the guiding principle here is "best interests of the child". Okayyyy.
/r/MensRights01/02/14 04:45 PM
1

She didn't even know it was an accident until later Yeah, only a few minutes later, and when she found out, she still didn't do anything about it. She was still charged with two counts of failure to perform duties of a driver to injured persons. This article explains what happened a little more clearly. Levi said Garcia-Cisneros, her brother and her boyfriend checked the car for damage and blood, but found none. He told jurors she went into shock and convinced herself she did not drive over the …
/r/MensRights01/02/14 04:36 PM
11

AHAHAHA. You can't make this shit up. "It's different because men are violent and women aren't. When women do it, it's just gossip, but when men do it, it's harassment." Feminist "equality", everyone. This is why we hate you. Edit: Okay, this clown doesn't seem sincere about this anymore after reviewing their post history. Posted one month ago: This app is disgusting! It is terrible and demeaning to all women across the earth! Alcatraz should be reopened and the creator of Chicklopedia thrown in…
/r/MensRights28/01/14 02:40 AM
4

Even among MRAs? Some MRAs don't like this sub because many of the people here are too idealistic and don't offer any practical solutions. Also I don't like it when this sub basically turns into male version of feminism by whining about really trivial shit. But I judge communities by their best content, not their worst.
/r/MensRights27/01/14 11:43 PM
5

Feminists are so fucking pathetic making up this type of shit. They see some MRAs talk about how they used to be feminists and just turn it around and use that kind of story for themselves thinking it'll get them some easy credibility. Except it's hardly believable at all because feminism has been pretty popular for several decades now and the MRM hasn't even been for one yet. Stupid.
/r/MensRights27/01/14 06:25 PM
11

It's funny that feminists hate /r/conspiracy so much because pretty much all of them believe in at least one conspiracy (patriarchy).
/r/MensRights27/01/14 06:18 PM
0

/r/askwomen is more like r/askfeminists or r/askSRS than anything really. That thread isn't even that bad though, I don't know what you're complaining about. Also they'll ban you if you ever link to any of their threads in another sub. Also, not men's rights.
/r/MensRights26/01/14 01:21 AM
2

That's a false equivalence, though. Ah, a feminist favorite pretentious way of saying "THAT'S DIFFERENT" as an excuse for their special pleading. For people supposedly so interested in equality, it's funny how they constantly come up with rationalizations to treat men and women differently. But even if we were to think of some hypothetical scenario where the father bails on the relationship with the mother as soon as she finds out she's pregnant, he would still widely be viewed as a scumbag Stev…
/r/MensRights26/01/14 01:15 AM
2

Jews Men run hollywood!
/r/MensRights25/01/14 03:02 AM
2

Making it easier women to pass is just the most "wat" thing to me. PT standards are just about making sure you're not a complete lard ass, and that you're healthy enough to not be a complete medical liability. Most jobs in the military do not require you to run or do push ups. For jobs where physical fitness really is important though, they still have the same standards. Actually they didn't even allow women in them at all until like last year. I don't push for forcing women to join the military…
/r/MensRights24/01/14 01:32 AM
44

So women are comparable to the disabled and elderly? They get reserved seating because they're not as able-bodied as everyone else. Is that what you're saying about women too? No, you didn't say that. You said women should get reserved seating because MEN ARE EVIL. Even though women are statistically less likely to to be victims of violent crime, you still think they are more deserving of protection. Really there is no other way to describe your attitude other than man hating sexism.
/r/MensRights09/01/14 05:18 AM
7

The only fucking time I ever even hear that phrase is from feminists acting like everyone says it all the time.
/r/MensRights09/01/14 04:58 AM
30

Not as common Crime stats obviously do not reflect that but your response would probably be something like pretending to know how often sex crimes aren't reported. You are a bigot trying to justify discrimination because of your irrational prejudices and you have the gall to think of yourself as reasonable. Not sure if you are aware of American history but bus seating was a huge civil rights issue for blacks. You even share the same arguments as your racist counterparts, playing on fear and tryi…
/r/MensRights09/01/14 04:55 AM
3

Do you guys even comprehend privilege? Yeah. Privilege is middle to upper class white women whining about how they get too much sexual attention, how they can't understand how false rape accusations are a problem because they never would have to fear one against them being taken seriously because they're women, how there not being enough super powerful visible rich women is a huge problem while the vast majority of homeless and workplace fatalities being male is not, when women get lesser senten…
/r/MensRights06/01/14 06:33 AM
5

Some SRSer was buddies with someone in there and told them to do it. They were bragging that they were going to do it before it happened. What, besides their shoddy and confrontational writing style, invalidates the SPLC's (supposed) ruling? What validates it? Do they get to just say "oh they're a hate group" with no explanation? I mean if what you read from them convinces you sufficiently then that's all you need. If it doesn't, then...it doesn't.
/r/MensRights06/01/14 06:11 AM
7

The saddest part of family court is how disproportionately staffed it is with female case workers. No, the sad part is that when they act like this, not when they're just female. Being a woman doesn't guarantee that they act like this and being a man doesn't guarantee that they won't.
/r/MensRights03/01/14 08:12 PM
2

Didn't you hear? 1 in 4 women are raped which means 1 in 4 men are rapists.
/r/MensRights03/01/14 08:08 PM
0

Because women's lives are simply seen as more valuable than men's. That's why it's "women and children first" in emergencies. That's why violence against women is seen as worse than when it's done to a man. That's why women pretty much never do any of the most dangerous work. That's why feminism is taken so much more seriously, because there is an instinctual bias in most people to favor women. And that's also why feminists hate evolutionary psychology, because it points that out.
/r/MensRights01/01/14 06:57 PM
6

Feminists have managed to convince a bunch of people that men are already "priveleged", so any men's rights groups is seen as a male supremacist one. That's also how they argue feminism is for equality, because they view women in general as being worse off than men.
/r/MensRights01/01/14 06:50 PM
1

Are you nuts? HR will probably still find a way to make him the bad guy somehow.
/r/MensRights27/12/13 03:40 AM
1

It's just first world control freak problems. Insecure, bitter women complaining about their competition that they know they don't hold a candle to and don't even want to bother to try. It's nowhere near a women's rights issue and purely about selfishness and jealously. You could even argue that it's anti- women's rights because apparently those pretty women shouldn't be allowed to get paid to be models and that is basically what it seems like they want.
/r/MensRights26/12/13 04:46 AM
13

They actually seem to have this thing where they sarcastically agree with accusations like that against them then exaggerate them a little further and act like it's absurd that anyone would even think that. That's one of their go-to defenses.
/r/MensRights26/12/13 01:53 AM
18

Man, I see so many of you people with some form of the word misandry in your username. It's like you wear it as a badge of honor, it's creepy.
/r/MensRights25/12/13 11:36 PM
2

You could just Google 'laws that discriminate against women' and come get thousands of results from all over the world. Okay so what are they? I googled that by the way and I see that the second link is this, which is about a law that requires people to submit citizenship documents that match their current legal name in order to register to vote. So their argument is that since women get their name changed in marriage more often than men, this law impact them more and is therefore "discriminator…
/r/MensRights24/12/13 07:32 PM
1

The only difference between men and women was the section about what they think will happen in the near future, not what they think should happen. Nope, keep reading. There is a "should be" section.
/r/MensRights23/12/13 03:40 PM
1

I still don't think you quoted the most relevant bits, but I did read through the article now that you linked to it and do see that the results of that poll showed a little bit more women are pro-choice, which does actually contradict what I said. But since there's still a very minor difference, some polls show the opposite, like this one, which does say that a little bit more men think abortion should be generally available, and a little less men think it should not be permitted at all. That is…
/r/MensRights22/12/13 01:30 AM
2

So this sub doesn't care about black men because one black guy doesn't like an analogy that some MRA used?
/r/MensRights21/12/13 04:04 AM
4

It does count as mens issues but a black mens issues, not a white mens issue, that's my whole point. Okay so where the fuck did anyone say anything about it being a white man's issue? Who is this point being addressed to? this sub doesn't give a fuck about black men What makes you say that? I'm sure there are plenty of black male posters here. I've seen videos of black MRAs.
/r/MensRights21/12/13 03:29 AM
5

And the gap between white men and women can be explained by confounding factors, the one between blacks and everyone else cannot. Details? Which factors? You still didn't answer the question. How is complaining about the sentencing gap for men appropriating black men's issues? Would it somehow not count as a men's issue if you could prove that it's only a black men's issue?
/r/MensRights21/12/13 03:23 AM
9

The only way to truly point out disparity isn't the sheer numbers of different groups Why did you just try to do that then by posting that image then? Are you calling yourself disingenuous? but how long their sentences compare when similar crimes are committed Sure, and men still get harsher sentences than women. For every crime. How is that not a men's issue? How is that appropriating black men's issues?
/r/MensRights21/12/13 03:11 AM
22

It is. It's also a men's issue. Men are much, MUCH more likely to go to prison than women. Even in your image you can see that white men are more likely to go than black women.
/r/MensRights21/12/13 01:58 AM
73

I saw post one time where some idiot feminist started to talk about how MRAs complaining about the sentencing gap is "appropriating black men's issues". so lol
/r/MensRights21/12/13 12:59 AM
1

Is that supposed to contradict what I said? Because it doesn't.
/r/MensRights20/12/13 08:28 PM
1

Did the police suddenly stop existing?
/r/MensRights20/12/13 08:26 PM
4

it's a question of who is doing the attacking and why Why? Also reproductive rights are mostly opposed by women. Polls say more women are pro lifers than men. You've bought into the narrative of man haters by blaming the issue all on men.
/r/MensRights20/12/13 04:27 PM
1

Why should we apologize? What harm was caused? A tool for false rape accusations was stopped, and the purpose was to do that before before any real reputations were harmed. If you could show that we happened to do that in the process, then maybe there'll be an apology, but otherwise I don't see anything to apologize for other upsetting a bunch of feminists.
/r/MensRights20/12/13 02:30 PM
3

I heard there's also a war on christmas too.
/r/MensRights20/12/13 02:24 PM
2

It's cute. Feminists for once in their fucking lives pretend to act principled but end up failing completely. They can't even understand why false accusations are bad. They just see that MRAs did it and use that as an excuse to go on the attack. They don't even want to acknowledge that no one's reputation was tarnished with them and that it was motivated by the intent stop it from ruining real peoples' lives. Ridiculous. Just shows that these assholes really have no moral compass and are tribili…
/r/MensRights19/12/13 02:34 PM
2

the "getting trolled" accusations. What the hell is that even supposed to mean exactly? Oh no, so what if we were potentially trolled. Big fucking deal. Imagine that there are people outraged by something, and an agent provocateur incites them to a riot. If you restrict the authority involved to only two options - letting the riot continue, or stopping the riot entirely - which should they take? But it wasn't even close to a riot. At worst it was some members of the community participating in be…
/r/MensRights19/12/13 12:10 AM
7

I'm not pleased that you removed the post actually. This is obviously upsetting all the psychotic SJWs because it's an effective way of fighting the bullshit of that anonymous report form. They all try to brag about how we never accomplish anything but then when we even come close to doing something they throw huge hissy fits like at the Warren Farrell talk. They have no problem with falsely accusing people of things and then suddenly they want to act indignant when they are being used against t…
/r/MensRights18/12/13 04:21 AM
10

could have massively helped male rape victims HOW? Fucking absurd. Not sure if you know this but male rape victims receive next to no support from anyone and feminist fucks like you are a big reason why. It couldn't have possibly helped any victims of rape more than the police could have. You can go ahead and argue that flooding the page with obviously false complains is wrong on principle, but to claim that this shit would have actually ended up helping anyone is just dumb.
/r/MensRights18/12/13 04:07 AM
2

If I had to guess I'd say it's motivated by their attempt at eugenics sort of. They don't hate all men just like the bottom 90% that they deem worthless. That's why they spend most of their time attacking those men and finding ways to jail them or socially ostracize them more easily, and rarely doing so to the ones that you'd think they have the most problem with, which are the most privileged men.
/r/MensRights17/12/13 01:23 AM
0

They would see unconscious attitudes of dominance and power in that expression, and they would wish you to re-examine your underlying beliefs. That's just what they say to rationalize the way it makes them feel. The reality is that it upsets them because of jealousy and insecurity. But they know they just can't say that because it makes them look pathetic, so they come up with another excuse to attack guys who do that that's a lot more abstract and can pass off for a more legitimate complaint.
/r/MensRights17/12/13 01:18 AM
1

You're right, feminists just ban men altogether, and their reasoning for doing so is that men are evil and will harm the women.
/r/MensRights17/12/13 01:14 AM
1

It's on page 24. Or just use ctrl+f.
/r/MensRights16/12/13 02:30 AM
2

No. The conviction rate is not 92%. The unfounded rate is just cases that were proven to be false, not cases that were thrown out due to insufficient evidence. Plus there's also the cases where innocent men get convicted too, like Brian Banks. I'm not even arguing that there is an "epidemic" of false rape accusations either. How often it happens is irrelevant and of course the most important thing is the rights of the accused. But people throw around the 8% figure very often and I feel like ther…
/r/MensRights16/12/13 02:29 AM
2

This is something to throw in feminists faces every time they bring up the 8% percent stat while trying to argue how false rape accusations are so rare. Not only does it happen more than for every other type of crime, but even four times more than the average. Also keep in mind that these are just the ones that were proven false. The real rate of false rape accusations is somewhere between that 8% and all the other ones that don't lead to a conviction.
/r/MensRights15/12/13 08:02 PM
2

Do you also think that black men are just more criminal than everyone else just because they're arrested more? Blacks are shown to get harsher sentences for the same crimes. There is provable discrimination. Same with just men in general in comparison to women though. What is your explanation for that by the way? I'm saying that the statistics that are gathered from psychological professionals show less of them because they're less likely to need psychological help. If you're more supported and …
/r/MensRights13/12/13 01:12 AM
2

I can't really have a discussion about this with you when your premise is false. You coming up with some half-assed explanation isn't enough to disprove the reports of there being three times more male to female transgenders than the other way around. The premise isn't necessarily false, you just don't want to acknowledge it for even a second. Your explanation sucks too by the way. Since even you admit that female to male transgenders are more socially acceptable, how the fuck does that explain …
/r/MensRights13/12/13 12:05 AM
5

Feminists are constantly trying to redefine words to suit their agenda. Is that what she's talking about?
/r/MensRights12/12/13 02:20 AM
2

I think we've got a professional quote maker here.
/r/MensRights12/12/13 02:17 AM
9

Because women's lives are valued more.
/r/MensRights12/12/13 02:16 AM
8

I did not mean to imply otherwise. I thought "they" was a generally accepted gender neutral substitute to the he/she pronouns.
/r/MensRights12/12/13 01:27 AM
2

isn't really relevant to this topic It's relevant to the topic of which gender has more privilege. You might not be too interested in that discussion but I think that's what a lot of people here are. a transgender person may be transgender because they feel like they're in the wrong body So then how would feminists explain more men wanting to be women? And how does that fit in with feminist ideas about gender being an entirely social construct? It's more acceptable for women to dress in men's cl…
/r/MensRights12/12/13 01:23 AM
1

There are also (better-documented) cases of transgender men much preferring the treatment they get as men than they got as women Aren't there a lot more male to female transgenders than the other way around though?
/r/MensRights12/12/13 12:05 AM
3

Yes...when I was a teenager. Haven't listened to that kind of music in a while though.
/r/MensRights11/12/13 11:52 PM
7

Women complaining about problems that do not exist A lot of their problems do exist, they're just so clearly "first world problems".
/r/MensRights11/12/13 11:49 PM
8

Are they saying men can't be feminists?
/r/MensRights11/12/13 11:47 PM
3

You keep mixing up civil law with criminal law. And even in contract law people aren't normally charged with felonies for getting others to agree to contracts while they're intoxicated. You're the one that doesn't like reality.
/r/MensRights08/12/13 09:58 PM
4

it is a violent crime to take the sex without agreement It's a violent crime when violence or force becomes involved. And simply being intoxicated isn't enough to void someone's agreement when someone else is being charged with rape. If you want to show us a case proving otherwise, go ahead, because rape laws don't say anything about that.
/r/MensRights08/12/13 08:50 PM
3

if an agreement to have sex is found to be void, what sort of sex is it then? UNCONSENSUAL! IT'S CLEARLY RAPE. You're making appeals from contract law and trying to get them involved in criminal matters. Not only that but you're advocating for punishments that don't even come up in civil suits. This shit doesn't make any sense. Also rape is a crime that where it's necessary to prove malicious intent. We don't throw people in jail for failing to properly judge how intoxicated someone is, and it's…
/r/MensRights08/12/13 06:28 PM
17

It's just one of those words they overuse because it's a popular insult. There really isn't much to it.
/r/MensRights08/12/13 05:08 PM
4

Capacity law allows you to plead that drunkenness is mitigating in both criminal law and law that governs agreements and agreements between people (contract / civil law). As far as I'm aware, intoxication isn't a mitigating circumstance under criminal law since it's self induced. That's where the OP's analogy is in error. Under contract law, an agreement can be rendered void when if the party was intoxicated. The thing is that no one is charged with a felony when that happens though. So to charg…
/r/MensRights08/12/13 05:00 PM
-9

While of course one could say that it would benefit men, I don't think it would be done for primary purpose of benefiting men. A lot of women go to college to find a partner and they wouldn't like it very much if educated, successful men became too scarce. If that were to happen, it seems like affirmative action for male students becoming common would be a near guarantee.
/r/MensRights04/12/13 03:37 AM
4

Woman is at all intoxicated when she has sex? Rape. Woman doesn't give enthusiastic verbal consent? Rape. Woman is coerced, lied to, or manipulated in some way in an event that led to the act? Rape. I do believe we live in a patriarchy Why?
/r/MensRights02/12/13 06:00 AM
11

Feminists oppose us on a lot of major issues. They're responsible for the current state of the domestic violence industry that denies men access to shelters and hiding and ignoring male victims in statistics. They are against the idea of legal paternal surrender. They even mock the idea of "spermjacking". They are doing as much as they can to eliminate due process rights for men in rape cases and even expand the definition of rape. These are the biggest ones I can think of right now. Overall tho…
/r/MensRights01/12/13 07:12 PM
2

I'd say that some people think of rape as because they're usually the thinking the victim of is a woman. Generally any violent act committed against a woman people are more likely to consider as being worse than when it's done to a man. They all have their list of different excuses of course but that one conclusion is always a constant.
/r/MensRights21/11/13 04:30 AM
2

the general consensus on reddit seems to be that rape is a much more serious crime than murder I don't think most people actually think that, it just seems like a vocal minority of people who are obsessed with rape in the first place that think that. And of course those people are more likely to chime in with their opinions on the topic.
/r/MensRights21/11/13 04:26 AM
1

This line of reasoning argues that rape victims might as well be dead because that would be a better fate than being a rape victim. I remember reading one time that this was pretty much the reason for rape victims being stoned in the middle east. Because if the woman didn't defend herself against the act with her life, and was still raped, then she didn't resist hard enough. Not sure how true that is (or if rape victims do indeed get stoned just for being raped), but that is the only explanation…
/r/MensRights21/11/13 04:24 AM
3

men cheat more How the fuck do they even know though? Sure maybe men are more likely to admit to cheating, which is probably what they actually know. But even assuming the claim "men cheat more" is true, there can be a lot of different ways to explain that. Men do seem to have lower standards for people they would consider having sex with, so there's that. Shit like this always just seems to be looking for a way to bash men. Oh it's because they have poor impulse control.
/r/MensRights20/11/13 04:08 AM
3

You're over-thinking it a bit. It's insulting simply because women are generally seen as worse at sports. It's just not what they do. It's like if someone wanted insult a woman's child rearing or cooking skills by comparing her abilities to that of a typical man.
/r/MensRights20/11/13 01:02 AM
1

Still waiting for you to name those countries. Oh wait, you were just making shit up.
/r/MensRights19/11/13 10:56 PM
3

Name them.
/r/MensRights19/11/13 04:48 PM
5

the fact that women have more rights now than they have in the past Women have more rights than men do right NOW. There are laws making it illegal to cut up female infant genitals, but none for male infants. There are laws that allow women to unilaterally abdicate responsibly of a child post conception, but none for men. Feminism is necessary. Why? You can't even name a single god damned right that women don't have that men don't. Anyone who thinks life would be easier as a woman doesn’t underst…
/r/MensRights19/11/13 04:44 PM
6

Stop femsplaining.
/r/MensRights19/11/13 04:38 PM
2

Every feminist survey that deliberately hides the vast majority of male victims of rape.
/r/MensRights14/11/13 01:16 AM
6

Rape jokes almost always tip the scale to "upsetting people" instead of "delighting them."... not everyone agrees that rape is wrong. So rape jokes upset people because not everyone agrees rape is wrong? What a dumbass. The real reason rape jokes upset people is because people think only women can be victims of rape. And anything bad happening to women always upsets people more than the same happening to a man.
/r/MensRights14/11/13 01:12 AM
3

I don't know exactly what submissions you're talking about but a lot of them are posted here just to show how ridiculous some feminists are. So it only promotes our "side" because it's something that they think makes feminists look bad.
/r/MensRights05/11/13 03:44 AM
5

Not sure but it definitely gets used a lot on the SRS subs.
/r/MensRights05/11/13 03:31 AM
1

Yes, men can be sexually harassed and raped, but women face it a LOT more often. For one, you don't actually know that. That's just what you perceive and what gets reported. Two, female victims of sexual assault already receive far more social support than male victims. Three, sex related crimes are just one category of violent crimes. In general, male victims of violent crime outnumber female victims if you count every single category. The wage gap is decreasing, but it still exists. That's not…
/r/MensRights05/11/13 03:30 AM
1

So what percentage of those male editors edit the men's rights related articles or even KNOW about the MRM in the first place?
/r/MensRights05/11/13 03:22 AM
22

"special snowflake" at least that's the term reddit feminists like to use
/r/MensRights05/11/13 03:18 AM
-18

guys slap each others asses all the time and they don't punch each other for it
/r/MensRights03/11/13 11:34 PM
14

and as a male, you'd face an even harsher punishment, and hardly anyone would sympathize with you if it was a woman you did it to.
/r/MensRights03/11/13 11:26 PM
12

One hundreds bucks says the feminists who are crying about excessive force are the same ones who were whining about how unfair it was when some woman was charged with battery for breaking a man's nose after he allegedly slapped her ass.
/r/MensRights03/11/13 11:07 PM
0

Hey jackass, just because you aren't aware of all the infringements of men's rights that we wish to redress doesn't mean that "men's rights" is a misnomer. Like for instance we want baby dick cutting illegal. That's a basic human rights issue because it's fucking child abuse.
/r/MensRights03/11/13 07:29 PM
8

there is a very androcentric atmosphere on the internet--moreso than in real life it's not as much of an issue outside of online culture Do you even pay attention to what you're saying? I know why people say "what about the menz", you don't have to femsplain it to me. Because they are fucking crazy exactly like you said and they hate men and have no compassion for them.
/r/MensRights29/10/13 09:17 PM
8

I believe that usually just gets met with "WHAT ABOUT THE MENZ" in feminist circles, so no, not really.
/r/MensRights29/10/13 07:43 PM
2

The perception of women as harmless doves, beyond reproach, and men as sex-crazed violent cretins is a Men's Rights Issue. The perception that women are the only "safe" caregivers for children is likewise, a Men's Rights Issue. Nope, disagree. We're not trying to be the thought police here. As long as these perceptions do not influence any laws and the way they are enforced, it's fine if there are random crazy people out there that think these things. Remember this forum is supposed to be about …
/r/MensRights26/10/13 04:29 PM
2

Like a dunce cap?
/r/MensRights26/10/13 02:00 AM
6

if a woman is drinking in a bar and someone spikes her drink This pretty much never happens for the record. It's an urban legend along the lines of putting razorblades whatever gets handed out to trick or treaters.
/r/MensRights26/10/13 01:52 AM
2

Why would you expect someone to get assaulted for dressing as a spooky ghost for halloween?
/r/MensRights26/10/13 01:50 AM
3

the unintentional guy’s responses are selfish because they put his interests before the woman’s I don't feel like I even have to keep reading anymore, this is probably what the whole thing is going to be about. "Her feelings and desires are more important than yours so just do what they want." Stupid. There's no reason for any man to take any of this seriously because it's not even trying to come off as being advice for men on how to be successful with women, it's just a list of demands.
/r/MensRights23/10/13 04:29 AM
3

Huh? Academic feminism is the same. I dare you to find me a feminist who doesn't think men have "oppressed" women throughout history and still do to this day.
/r/MensRights21/10/13 09:51 PM
4

I can't seem to grasp why people would elect to use this term If you that it's because too inflammatory that's exactly the point. Feminists want people to believe that women are being raped everywhere and receiving no justice at all, and our society not only condones it but encourages it.
/r/MensRights21/10/13 08:44 PM
2

women are viewed as more delicate and in need of male 'saving' How this "patriarchy"? This is exactly what feminists try to get everyone to think too. According to them, men are privileged assholes that need to stop being so evil and oppressing the poor innocent women.
/r/MensRights21/10/13 08:37 PM
1

You don't get 15 downvotes without an explanation.... What are you talking about? Everyone gets some downvotes because reddit fuzzes the votes. But this post is linked to in /r/againstmensrights which explains why some feminists are in here commenting.
/r/MensRights21/10/13 02:19 AM
3

Post doesn't even show in your history. Even if it was removed by a mod it still would unless you deleted it yourself. Or you're just making this all up.
/r/MensRights21/10/13 01:44 AM
2

Is that the subreddit you were banned from?
/r/MensRights21/10/13 01:11 AM
4

Like I already said, any subreddit that does that probably isn't too big. Stop describing them using words like major and main. what is the ulterior motives behind it? They want to surround themselves with like-minded people? Seems obvious.
/r/MensRights21/10/13 12:34 AM
0

When did you become a MRA?
/r/MensRights21/10/13 12:21 AM
-1

There are some subs that are basically covertly a part of the "fempire" like /r/anarchism but I wouldn't count any of them as "major". I've had some anti-feminist comments deleted in some of the default subs but it never came with a ban.
/r/MensRights21/10/13 12:20 AM
15

Or maybe they realized it would be a mistake to bring any kind of publicity to the manosphere since their goal was obviously to get everyone to hate on it. Maybe they thought their hit piece was too transparently bullshit and would just have the opposite effect of what was intended.
/r/MensRights19/10/13 04:48 PM
1

We should upvote this.
/r/MensRights19/10/13 04:41 PM
2

Authorities have laws that prohibit people from wearing see through clothing and thongs in public because, you know, it's fucking public?! Wait so then what were all the slut walks about? I thought women should be able to wear whatever they want! (But not men of course)
/r/MensRights19/10/13 04:39 PM
2

women do have a lot of problems; more problems than we have lol name them
/r/MensRights18/10/13 07:38 PM
4

I simply cannot stand the Feminist notion that nobody paying attention to you or acknowledging your existence is a "privilege". I don't think they even truly believe this either, this is just them stating the opposite of the truth like they always do. By their very same logic, ugly people are privileged in comparison to more attractive people. Does ANYONE really think that? Of course not. But they are so privileged that they can get away with claiming up is down and down and up without people re…
/r/MensRights18/10/13 07:31 PM
4

The insult of doing something like a girl means the exact opposite of what feminists like to try and make it seem like it means. It really means "you do that thing like a spoiled and over-priveleged brat that has never had to compete for anything or prove their worth to anyone in their life because they live in a gynocentric culture that babies them."
/r/MensRights17/10/13 08:20 PM
2

lol at the fear and anger in the interviewer's face
/r/MensRights17/10/13 05:45 AM
-5

The reason they get mad when they are told not to dress like sluts or not drink too much or whatever is because that's obviously how they go out to have fun. So it's not even really an issue of whether or not telling them they shouldn't do that is actually victim blaming, they just don't like it when they are told they shouldn't have fun if they want to be safer. They are so spoiled that they think it should be everyone else's responsibility to keep them safe, so that's what they demand.
/r/MensRights15/10/13 03:39 AM
7

For these people it's not just about making games that they like, it's also about making sure games featuring characters and stories that they don't like don't get made.
/r/MensRights13/10/13 12:57 AM
-1

According to the legal definition of sexual assault, consent is vitiated when someone is intoxicated, and sex without consent is sexual assault. Drunk one-night stands are by legal definition sexual assault. That's not actually true... yet, at least. It's pretty obvious that feminists want it to be true by pretending it already is and calling all drunk sex rape anyway.
/r/MensRights12/10/13 03:53 AM
10

The laws are draconian. That's kind of the point of this subreddit. And I'm pretty sure we can blame feminists for these laws.
/r/MensRights11/10/13 06:47 AM
-3

If those are the hardest parts about being a woman then being one seems pretty easy. The number two answer is literally an irrational paranoia based on prejudice, it reads like a parody. It's like if someone asked what are the hardest parts about being white and the top comment was "well I gotta be afraid of all those minorities".
/r/MensRights05/10/13 06:43 PM
1

You talk about a lot of things that have happened in the past or in other countries. I'll give you some examples of things that happen in the US today. Women get preferential treatment and affirmative action in their favor in many businesses. Female voters outnumber male ones. Men get fucked over in divorce courts. Men dominate all the shitty and dangerous occupations. Men are the soldiers, the construction workers, the garbageman, the coal miners, the truck drivers. They live to serve and prote…
/r/MensRights03/10/13 05:40 PM
3

the ones who're expected to quit their job to take care of their children Yeah because being a wage slave is so great and spending time with your own kids is so horrible. LOL
/r/MensRights03/10/13 05:31 PM
1

The video game analogy is also hilarious to anyone that has ever played a MMO game. If you pick a female character and act like you're a girl, everyone is nicer to you and gives you free shit.
/r/MensRights03/10/13 04:54 AM
6

I didn't read the whole thing, just kind of skimmed through it, but I feel like responding to this: A man has the privilege of walking past a group of strange women without worrying about being catcalled, or leered at, or having sexual suggestions tossed at him. A pretty common male response to this point is “that’s a privilege? I would love if a group of women did that to me.” And that response, right there, is a perfect shining example of male privilege. No, that's a perfect example of a first…
/r/MensRights03/10/13 04:45 AM
1

I have yet to come across a man who is genuinely harmed by the removal of his foreskin as an infant. So? There are many men out there that are not happy with an irreversible procedure being done to them as an infant against their will. Something like a hundred babies a year in the US even die from complications relating to procedure. It doesn't matter if you know men that grew up without noticeable harm from it, cutting up a babies dick is straight up child abuse and a human rights violation.
/r/MensRights02/10/13 04:56 PM
5

what do MRA's believe is an appropriate level of support? For starters, actual acknowledgement by our laws and justice system that men do get raped and sexually assaulted by women, and giving those female perpetrators the same punishments a man committing the same crime would get (women get lighter sentences than men for pretty much every crime BTW). Like for instance under British law, the definition of a rape explicitly states that you need a penis in order to be a rapist.
/r/MensRights02/10/13 04:49 PM
1

It's not a problem when it's just stupid random facebook posts.
/r/MensRights25/09/13 11:32 PM
6

A man should be allowed to be around children without being labelled a paedophile: MRAs believe this, and I doubt many feminists would disagree. Sure, maybe if you phrase it like that. But the second anyone proposes giving men protections against allegations of sexual assault, the feminists become outraged. Even you admit that it's a contentious topic right after that. That's why feminism is not the other half of the same coin, because they openly oppose things like due process rights for men. T…
/r/MensRights25/09/13 11:27 PM
-7

Probably because they are imagining all the rapists being men. An article like this fits nicely into their "rape culture" narrative, not really that surprising.
/r/MensRights25/09/13 02:41 AM
2

I think the brand of feminism that we routinely call out here really only exists on the internet I wish. Feminist crap related to sexual assault has permeated into the military. Everyone is routinely told that drunk sex is tantamount to rape. Also, like the other guy said, feminist influence is all over college campuses.
/r/MensRights24/09/13 07:41 PM
5

I don't think that's what he was talking about. There was a popular submission that linked to SRSdiscussion right around the time links to here stopped being accepted. The admins and several mods on the default subreddits very clearly "side" with SRS on a lot of issues. There's no point in trying to downplay their bias to those who are actually paying attention.
/r/MensRights23/09/13 06:00 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter