TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Euphoric-Row-5346 Archive

View 5 posts and 270 comments by Euphoric-Row-5346 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

This is Reddit, and it is full of shit. I literally met shit tons of female roaches, simps, and trolls too. I got called by many different ad hominem insults, and names. And now, I became extremely hostile to any kinds of internet trolls. If you don't wanna become like this, you'd better just stop using Reddit or websites like Reddit. Regardless of whether you like it or not, it is full of shits. I persoanlly hate female roaches and hateful male simps, but there are more trolls than just those t…
/r/MensRights03/10/23 09:43 PM
1

What if a husband identifies as a transgender and accuses his wife of being transphobic to him?
/r/MensRights03/10/23 09:36 PM
0

Wealthy men got their money they deserve. They didn't still money unlike a few modern women who benefitted from Affirmitive Action or female quota. Plus, the majority of workplace accidents consist of male workers. Almost 100%. The majority of officers are men. The majority of firefighters are men. Women do not sacrifice anything for countries and frankly, even without them, countries would work fine. It sounds harsh, but it's true. Men can operate countries by themselves as only men are having …
/r/MensRights03/10/23 08:14 AM
1

Well, you like it or not, men are simps. Lots of them are. simps. Plus, women are not reverse simps. What does it mean? Gynocentrism. It is what it is. The only thing you can change in this dating market is yourself. Perhaps you can meet women from a foreign country or just walk away.
/r/MensRights03/10/23 08:09 AM
1

This explains them very well, I appreciate your comment.
/r/MensRights03/10/23 08:08 AM
1

Because, there're mentally unstable men. Many modern men, have become unstable, I think. And lots of women know that. They use that to make cash out of those poor stupid men. I've been to a femcel website which was full of femcels who got "friendshielded" by men and isolated from fellow modern females because they are too ugly. Well, yes I hated them because of their usual anti male statements, but some of what they were saying was true in a distorted way. One femcel on that website said she... …
/r/MensRights03/10/23 08:03 AM
3

Say the same thing to the feminists or females who try to cancel Conservatives for making offensive jokes.
/r/MensRights03/10/23 07:54 AM
1

I already reported you. It's disgusting that you're doxxing me and insulting me with useless ad hominem in order to drag this conversation into a useless raging festival. You and your fucker kind love to do this, because by making anger and rage, your kind can get away with having a genuine logical conversation. Now fuck you and do not ever reply to me again.
/r/MensRights03/10/23 04:40 AM
1

Fuck you, and fuck everything you represent.
/r/MensRights03/10/23 04:33 AM
1

It's amazing that fucker like you genuinely want to reply to every comment I made after calling me with useless ad hominem insults, on the MensRights sub which is a dedicated men's safe space. You like this now? Femcel? Now are you happy to share insults with me, fucker?
/r/MensRights03/10/23 04:27 AM
1

Fuck you femcel. Go away
/r/MensRights03/10/23 04:25 AM
1

Nah, I'm a transgenser and you're a bigoeted femcel and are always wrong.
/r/MensRights03/10/23 04:25 AM
1

Your wrong beliefs about misandry are unworthy of respect. You are a bigot and a femcel. Kudos on dehumanizing yourself. I am a transgenderwoman. Didn't I say that? Fuck you and go away, if only thing you wanna do is sharing insults, femcel.
/r/MensRights03/10/23 04:25 AM
–

I'll add this onto this. This is not my word, but from another Reddit User. https://www.reddit.com/r/changemyview/comments/12i3qiw/cmv_white_liberals_dont_understand_people_of_color/ "It's not that they don't understand people of color it's just they are just as racist as conservatives just in a different way. If a conservative says black people are animals everyone agrees that's racist but if a liberal says black people should bend over backwards to support lgbt groups while they do nothing in …
/r/MensRights03/10/23 01:08 AM
1

Plus, when it comes to the political power, gays' real political influence is none-existent just like the MRAs in the real politics. DemoKkkrats are using LGBT as their agenda, but for real, they don't give a shit. And even the majority of Democrats are straight. The Republican Party and the DemoKkkratic Party's main support base is coming from straight people, especially from the middle-class white Americans. If you think you or any of your kind (or even other groups) are special and important,…
/r/MensRights03/10/23 12:30 AM
1

BTW, I identify as a black transgender woman. Why would men think females are decent? Modern females are killing 73 million babies every year and get Affirmitive Actions to leech off of men. And why should some irrelevant modern poor men be responsible for what they didn't even do? If that's the case, modern females should be responsible for the baby Holocaust caused by their fellow modern females. Modern females kill 73 million babies every year. You thought that would be completely forgotten? …
/r/MensRights02/10/23 11:12 PM
2

According to one study, females started 25% of domestic abuse while men also initiated 25%. Isn't it amazing? Weak women abuse men as much as men because of the pussypass they have in their life. Theoretically, men would abuse women more as they are stronger, but it's not the case. It tells you about modern females and men. https://www.domestic-violence-law.com/blog/2016/april/women-or-men-who-usually-instigates-domestic-vio/#:~:text=Studies%20show%20that%20in%20half,but%20also%20around%20the%20…
/r/MensRights01/10/23 11:07 PM
0

But telling lies is not illegal.
/r/MensRights01/10/23 11:00 PM
1

Yes
/r/MensRights01/10/23 10:58 PM
3

Come to think of that, wasn't the "right-wing pushback" against the Suffregette movement correct? I mean, see what's happening nowadays.
/r/MensRights01/10/23 10:56 PM
5

Throwing other men under the bus to be an exception to the feminist, female attack. This was one of the reasons behind why I had conflicting thoughts on gays, honestly. They say homophobia bad, and then they ally feminists, who are well-known for demonizing men and men's sexuality while glorifying female sexuality (it includes every kind of disgusting female sex fantasies). I mean, Idk. Are gay men my allies? It doesn't look like it. There are some gays against feminism, but I think the majority…
/r/MensRights01/10/23 01:15 PM
1

Disagree. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sociobiological_theories_of_rape#:~:text=Animal%20coercive%20sex,-Further%20information%3A%20Sexual&text=Behavior%20resembling%20rape%20in%20humans,to%20half%20of%20observed%20matings. Animal coercive sexBehavior resembling rape in humans can be seen in the animal kingdom, including ducks and geese, bottlenose dolphins, and chimpanzees. Indeed, in orangutans, close human relatives, such copulations constitute up to half of observed matings. In the prehis…
/r/MensRights01/10/23 02:22 AM
9

Even gay men have gynocentrism... it's not always about sex
/r/MensRights01/10/23 01:37 AM
–

I disagree. There're gay men, and even straight men who're called "草食系" do not give a shit about females. It's more about ingrained gynocentrism. Men are told to chase after females to become real men, and they believe they should provide females with resources, being simps. There're men who genuinely hate females to the point where they despise them as a disgusting sex, and the example is thr ancient Greeks. They believed gays are great as they do not fall into the sexual libido unlike straight…
/r/MensRights01/10/23 01:20 AM
3

Amswer to your comment: Nobody said men cannot resist the sexual libido. However, it is true that many females, or feminists do use sex as weapons against men because it has been effective at least until now. Feminists are making "I-am-not-going-to-have-sex-with-you-men" strike, and many women are saying "I'm not gonna have sex with Conservative men/ Trump supporters/ Christian men." Why are they doing this? They can just shut up and live their life instead of acting like protesting whores. On t…
/r/MensRights01/10/23 01:09 AM
19

The truth is, when females commit a crime, they face a shorter prison sentence. I don't know if this privilege also applies to transwomen (because many people still do not think transwomen are women), but females 100% get this legal benefit. https://www.huffpost.com/entry/men-women-prison-sentence-length-gender-gap_n_1874742 The study found that men receive sentences that are 63 percent higher, on average, than their female counterparts. Starr also found that females arrested for a crime are als…
/r/MensRights01/10/23 12:58 AM
2

He didn't even ask about morality or ethics, but you had to bring them up to refute "they were happy before feminism," which is Red Herring. Having a meaning in their life to please others can also make people happy. When a nurse sees her patient cured and happy, it can make that nurse happy too. So a housewife can be happy to serve her husband (at least theoretically) Just like that, at least theoretically, females can be happy in that movie too. What you're saying is a load of bullshit Red Her…
/r/MensRights30/09/23 01:09 AM
2

You didn't even ask about morality or ethics, but that user had to bring them up to refute "they were happy before feminism," which is Red Herring. Having a meaning in their life to please others can also make people happy. When a nurse sees her patient cured and happy, it can make that nurse happy too. So a housewife can be happy to serve her husband (at least theoretically) Just like that, at least theoretically, females can be happy in that movie too. What that user is saying is a load of bul…
/r/MensRights30/09/23 12:47 AM
2

LGBT activism is different from LGBT. Sure there are LGBT people, but there is "Drop the T movement," "LGBT movement," "TERF," or whatever ideologically motivated movements regarding LGBT.
/r/MensRights30/09/23 12:40 AM
4

There's no patriarchy. Females wouldn't have cars, planes, washing machines, roads and the civilizations without men. Females do not build buildings, roads, and infrastructure. Male workers consist of almost 100% of the industrial deaths, and male soldiers and male officers are doing their job to maintain this civilization. Patriarchy? It's more like female parasiticarchy. Housewife? F you if that's oppression to you. Male workers die male officers and male soldiers die to protect their countrie…
/r/MensRights30/09/23 12:33 AM
7

Men are smart, but also individualistic and gynocentric. They don't hesitate to put other men down when it means getting pussies. Not all men of course, cause there're gays (but even some gays are simps like straight guys it's ridiculous) or men who don't want to interact with females, but many of them. It's not even a minority of men. The majority of men are simps who don't hesitate to attack other men to get pussy points. Feminists use a small minority of male criminals to insult and generaliz…
/r/MensRights30/09/23 12:29 AM
2

Aha one more to add on that. If abortion was not murder, why did females and feminists got so offended when many Chinese aborted female babies? They know abortion is murder. Why whine about female abortion? What is this contradiction? Full stop. Abortion is murder of babies. For a fertilized egg to attach itself to the lining of the uterus and grow properly so that it can absorb nutrition from the mother's body. This is when a life starts. It has its own form of life inside the female body, and …
/r/MensRights29/09/23 10:44 AM
6

A cell in Mars is a life, but babies inside females' bodies are not real human beings... Huh no thanks. That is a bullshit. There's a continuity of life, and babies inside a womb is clearly a life, and a human being. Abortion is baby murder. I didn't even say abortion should be illegal or legal. Just stating the obvious fact. Abortion is child murder.
/r/MensRights29/09/23 10:25 AM
3

Abortion is killing babies. Doctor jailed for killing baby who ‘burst out crying’ after abortion https://righttolife.org.uk/news/doctor-jailed-for-killing-baby-who-burst-out-crying-after-abortion And our cause? What's that? I'm fighting against the idea that only men can do horrible things with a counter example.
/r/MensRights29/09/23 10:18 AM
5

Feminists can only have this much influence and power because of capitalism. And this is a great contradiction. Many feminists... claim they're against capitalism while screaming about gender pay gap. I mean, why do you wanna get a good office job (men don't owe females jobs and money) when it means you're just becoming a slave of capitalism? Why become a parasite which uses capitalism and claim you hate capitalism? They actively want to use and change capitalism in their favor, and then they cl…
/r/MensRights29/09/23 08:54 AM
11

You literally mentioned all of your reasoning behind this post, and that female just ignored all of your points and made fake accusations against you which were not stated by you in the first place. You explained what you want to say, and you explained why feminists' bs is wrong, and you were refuting their point, but that female had to just ignore all of that to fill its ego. That's bs.
/r/MensRights29/09/23 08:43 AM
6

Modern females kill 73 million babies every year. They're just physically weaker and less intelligent, but when they face weaker ones, they become monsters.
/r/MensRights29/09/23 08:38 AM
10

Female moment
/r/MensRights29/09/23 08:36 AM
10

Many women say "men hide their sexism before marriage and then show who they truely are," while women literally do this to their husband.
/r/MensRights29/09/23 08:31 AM
6

Fundementally... all soldiers and all male workers, all male officers are seen as resources. It doesn't have to do with Russia or Tsar whatever. Men sacrifice their everything for women and in return, they get a grave.
/r/MensRights27/09/23 11:53 AM
-6

First of all, more females have depression. https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/depression/in-depth/depression/art-20047725#:~:text=About%20twice%20as%20many%20women,to%20be%20diagnosed%20with%20depression. About twice as many women as men experience depression. So depression is more of a female problem really. Suppressing emotions can be good or can be bad, but at least there is no significant causation between those two as Females experience depression at a rate that is twice as hig…
/r/MensRights27/09/23 11:42 AM
4

Even by those racists' logic, females should get deported too. (I mean, you know why) It's not even about racism. It's just gynocentrism ingrained in men and females altogether.
/r/MensRights27/09/23 11:33 AM
32

That's why I always think feminism is just a toxic female nature. No responsibility with full privilege. Even their definition of feminism shows the toxic female nature. They define feminism as equality, and then they say something like this https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/5stit3/feminism_is_about_equality_its_not_a_hate_movement/ This is clearly a contradiction, and they're just brainwashing people with this good old female-wife tactic to control the husband. I think feminism means…
/r/MensRights27/09/23 11:25 AM
0

Still, I believe religions can be used as tools. Fundementally, I know God is not real. God is some kind of a tool to control people. God is a moral code for people to follow. See how Communusm, Capitalism, Conservativism, feminism, and MGTOW can work just like religions. That's why I believe God and religions can be used efficiently as a moral code even though I know God does not exist in the first place. Modern females lost their faith and their nature is coming out to replace their "tradition…
/r/MensRights27/09/23 11:13 AM
6

It's not up to you. Everyone has their freedom. The French revolution was a crime which was caused by malice. Did the French peasants have to shut their mouth and obey to nobles because "they shouldn't act with malice?" No thanks. Men have freedom. Colonialism, wars, science, math, biology, cars, planes, roads, rails, paper, gun powder, GMOs, all of these are products made by men as they are the ones who seek their freedom.
/r/MensRights25/09/23 12:47 AM
1

There's no evil. There's no good. Only what matters is what makes you happy. The goal of every single life is to be happy. Unfortunately, there are those who don't want to make you happy. And then, why care about their opinions? You can only find happiness in your heart.
/r/MensRights25/09/23 12:43 AM
1

At this point, I don't really know what to say. Ha ha like the talk is over. We cannot convert them, nor can they do convert me and you. I think even caring about their opinions is pointless. Perhaps, using a derogatory term against females (as they do that against men) and then walk away to live each other's lives would be a better option. I mean, they clearly see men their enemies. So, what would I do? Crying? Protesting? Walking away is the best option. We can dehumanize them too. I think pea…
/r/MensRights25/09/23 12:36 AM
0

https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/abortion
/r/MensRights24/09/23 08:50 AM
1

There is no misogyny. It's a made-up concept. You don't call people who hate Purple "purplogyny."
/r/MensRights24/09/23 05:27 AM
4

I think female users are more hateful than male users. Females are physically weak, which makes people believe females love peace. But see, they're killing 73 million babies every year. They can do whatever benefits them and they will justify with their mental gymnastics.
/r/MensRights24/09/23 05:25 AM
1

Women benefit from the system created and maintained by men. They didn't build the houses. They're not police officers (meh, a few female officers are there but just a few). They are not soldiers. They didn't invent planes, they didn't invent cars. If females want to say something like that, they need to refuse to use anything created by men. But of course, females should get all kinds of benefits of what was created by men while ignoring uncomfortable things like wars.
/r/MensRights24/09/23 05:22 AM
1

No you're wrong. Being black does not cause committing a crime. Discrimination against men and people of color causes it. You need to go back to the high school. Correlation does not imply causation Fallacy is what is being taught even in the high school.
/r/MensRights24/09/23 05:17 AM
1

I think it differently. Wars are inevitable in some cases, perhaps in many cases. Even monkies and tigers have their own "wars" to get more resources. Females who say they're pacifist for not starting wars should get out of the civilization created and maintained by men. For example, if there is lack of water (Syria is one example), people need to fight for the resources. So the "good females" can solve this problem with talks and feminism? No they're useless in such a situation. Only a war can …
/r/MensRights24/09/23 05:06 AM
3

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Women-are-wonderful_effect The women-are-wonderful effect is the phenomenon found in psychological and sociological research which suggests that people associate more positive attributes with women when compared to men. This bias reflects an emotional bias toward women as a general case. The phrase was coined by Alice Eagly and Antonio Mladinic in 1994 after finding that both male and female participants tend to assign positive traits to women, with female partici…
/r/MensRights21/09/23 04:57 AM
4

Systematic Gynocetrism. Men and women prefer females to men, which causes anti-male social structure. Even when more men are in power, they still prefer women. Of course when females are in power, they prefer women too.
/r/MensRights21/09/23 02:53 AM
3

Andrew Tate was hated by feminists not because of his actions, but because of the message he was spreading. Feminists don't care about murder or rape. They use murder and rape to gain power and to shut others down. I don't know whether Andrew Tate is truely a criminal or not, but he can say whatever he wants. Feminists have no right to criticize Andrew Tate's messages. Perhaps they can criticize his "actions," but not his messages. The "hatred" of Andrew Tate's ideology does not even match that …
/r/MensRights21/09/23 02:43 AM
1

Ceaser's Legion. Always support Ceaser!!!! He is the rightful owner of the Americas!
/r/MensRights21/09/23 01:46 AM
2

So being nice is a problem but being not nice is also a problem to you? Have fun with your friends instead of wasting your time uselessly
/r/MensRights21/09/23 01:07 AM
3

Nah, whatever that means... I'm not a nice guy. That is an npc comment.
/r/MensRights20/09/23 10:57 PM
1

I didn't know it. Thanks for letting me know
/r/MensRights20/09/23 10:55 PM
38

I felt sorry for him. That story was wild and crazy. and I'm now all for abolishing marriage, as it became a gynocentric female parasites' weapon.
/r/MensRights20/09/23 12:20 PM
50

wtf? She is not a victim. That itself proves this article is full of lies.
/r/MensRights20/09/23 12:18 PM
17

Perhaps you lost your ability to speak logically. You can get out of this sub, instead of being a snowflake melting down.
/r/MensRights20/09/23 12:16 PM
20

believe all women https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/5stit3/feminism_is_about_equality_its_not_a_hate_movement/
/r/MensRights20/09/23 12:10 PM
2

At least Affirmitive Action is now unconstitutional, but I know the female-quota would still be a thing.
/r/MensRights20/09/23 12:07 PM
1

I recommend you to read this, seriously. https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/5stit3/feminism_is_about_equality_its_not_a_hate_movement/ Women do not consist of sugar and honey. They say they want to killallmen, all kind of bullshit. If you truely believe that only men are shitty and violent, then read those books in that link.
/r/MensRights20/09/23 11:48 AM
1

Moreover, you said the concept still exists even after I change the word. However, let's say activists call peeple who hate cockroaches "toxic humanness." If they define "people hating on cockroaches," as "toxic humanness," and then is it a thing? When you give a name to an arbitrary concept or a claim, it creates power. I don't know if you know about it, but in some Eastern countries, knowing other people's age is extremely important because their language change according to who they speak to.…
/r/MensRights20/09/23 11:03 AM
1

I believe political correctness has a good point. First of all, sorry about all this shit. I was really annoyed by these all trolls, so I didn't speak to you kindly. So sure, I was sensitive, sorry about that. But my point still stands. I believe "political correctness" should be applied to men too. It's not cognitive dissonance. I learn from them. I think they have a point. I just disagree with their SJW political viewpoints. If feminists and SJWs changed words for women, why can't we do that f…
/r/MensRights20/09/23 10:30 AM
1

I don't have sister. “We are, as a sex, infinitely superior to men.” – Elizabeth Cady Stanton (Nov. 12, 1815 – Oct. 26, 1902; feminist; suffrage leader) (USA) Said by a female who literally live in a civilization created by, maintained by, and improved by men. Females didn't contribute that much to the human civilizations. Most rich countries were rich even 100 years ago, and many poor countries were also poor 100 years ago. If that's true that females are superior, why didn't they make no chang…
/r/MensRights20/09/23 06:33 AM
2

First of all gay men exist. It's like 7% of the population. (perhaps wrong) Asexual men exist. So men who don't feel anything towards women consist of almost 10% of the male population. So females who state that men want women are wrong.
/r/MensRights20/09/23 04:16 AM
1

I can think of one female feminist. Her name was something like Valerus Slanis? Something like that. She shot Andy Warhol and a few more men. Before that, she wrote that she wants to eliminate men in her book. I mean.... you can probably just get out. Why bother with working with a male boss and male coworkers? Just get out of the civilization created and maintained by men. I think the people who cry everyday for what they don't even deserve are disgusting. If they're psychotic murderers like th…
/r/MensRights20/09/23 03:38 AM
1

Yes, and lots of them are here now. When you put candies on the table with no protection, the insects are gonna come to eat. Unfortunately, I got bitten by those insects
/r/MensRights20/09/23 01:45 AM
1

You and your politically correct movement was literally centered around the idea that words are so important that they can be used to control people's mindset. The misandrist word coined by feminazis clearly has an ill intention. After your kind took over the academia, suddenly the rules are aboslute and I should follow that? No thanks.
/r/MensRights19/09/23 09:00 PM
1

And by the way you had the gut to call me brother after all this useless bullshit double standard. If you're female, then F you I'm not gonna get controlled by your kind. If you're male, also F you as I'm not gonna get controlled by your kind. I literally refuted your misandry and just reversed the gender. Why do you think modern females killing 73 million babies are protecting children and only men have monopoly on domestic abuse? You can go fuck yourself if that's all you have. If you want to …
/r/MensRights19/09/23 08:57 PM
1

No thanks. Judeo Bolshevism contains Jewish in its word and it has a fake propaganda against the Jews as what feminazis are doing it right now. Just becuase the academia was conquered by feminazis doesn't mean I have to follow them. https://www.amazon.com/Speechless-Controlling-Words-Minds/dp/1684510821 I don't want to get controlled by feminazis. You and your kind also fough against words to eliminate words like "businessmen," "policemen," and such. That is what's done in the name of political …
/r/MensRights19/09/23 08:51 PM
3

I have the feeling no matter what anyone could say it wouldent change your mind, you’ve grown in some way to despise woman in their entirety. Believing that through the potentially troubled or weird women you’ve come across, must be the average of them all. ---> I just reversed all of what you said. Enough bullshit. If I am anti female, it means you are anti male. I don't even believe all women are like that, I just wanted to refute what you're saying. You need to apologize first for making such…
/r/MensRights19/09/23 01:45 PM
6

You indeed are stubborn. First of all, that cultural pressure is not coming from masculinity. So, it's not that masculinity is toxic. Women also have this kind of similar mindset, so instead of it, I can just call that toxic femininity. It's not coming from masculinity. You keep ignoring my comments about Nazis. If you were in Nazi Germany, would you accept terms like Judeo Bolshevism as that's the way people call Communism in Germany? Feminazis intentionally demonize masculinity, and men by usi…
/r/MensRights19/09/23 01:11 PM
3

It's all subjective. To someone, "I love you" can be micro agression and to someone, "I hate you" could be okay. If you want men to be restricted with this vague rule, it's a bs. This is exactly why USA doesn't have anti hate speech laws. The definition is very vague and anything can be used to shut people down. Catcalling is nothing but a way to control men to behave the way they want. Just say don't be rude instead of making weird ideological terms.
/r/MensRights19/09/23 01:07 PM
6

I disagree with their naming. Is it that hard for you to understand? I can define all the bad shit as toxic femininity. Will females be okay with that? I don't think so. You can call that toxic femininity. racist terms like "Octaroons" or "Judeo Bolshevism" also have meanings. But those terms inherently contain toxic hate of the Nazis, which is why I reject their existence. Same with the word. Stop playing this useless game. I do not accept your kind's concept as I don't accept terms such as Jud…
/r/MensRights19/09/23 12:59 PM
6

"Hi I love you" can also be catcalling. It depends. Plus you just ignored my other points refuting all of the anti-male bullshit.
/r/MensRights19/09/23 12:14 PM
4

Have fun
/r/MensRights19/09/23 12:02 PM
4

I know you're a bullshit troll, but let me reply. Ideally this will be the last as I lost my interest with talking with all of the trolls like you. 1) My whole point is that just because you say you 'define' words or expressions as meaning something does not mean they will Ans: I agree. So feminazis should shut the fuck up and don't force their concepts to me. 2) Words have meanings. Judeo Bolshevism also has meaning, and like your kind's words, I do not respect that word's definition. Neo-Nazis…
/r/MensRights19/09/23 12:00 PM
7

You say this all baseless anti male bullshit and expects men to love women? That's beyond my understanding. Modern women have gone crazy and they genuinely believe men should love them even when they hate them. Just in case that you and your kind do not believe, here's the source. Studies of married couples show similar results with domestic violence being initiated as follows: 25% by male. 25% by female.Apr 21, 2016 https://www.domestic-violence-law.com/blog/2016/april/women-or-men-who-usually-…
/r/MensRights19/09/23 11:50 AM
5

Yada Yada Yada, sorry about the condescending tone, but you make your own fantasy world to back your baseless claims. It's again, all about the bullshit mindset. This is a lot of bullshit, but let me break it down. 1) catcalling is not a bad behavior. It's just normal seduction. 2) pointless violence= modern females kill 73 million babies every year 3) Homophobia= many females do have transphobia and homophobia too 4) Aggression towards others (generally those weaker) = Females litetally hate we…
/r/MensRights19/09/23 11:39 AM
8

The same can be said about showing too much emotion. Typically depressed people show lots of emotional actions. And there are more depressed women than men. You're making claims without meaningful data. See, it's all your opinion, not an absolute truth. Plus, why can't I just define that to be "toxic femininity? Men showing less emotion= Ingrained misandry Women showing more emotion= toxic femininity. This is exactly what feminists are doing. Plus, more women are depressed.
/r/MensRights19/09/23 11:22 AM
4

If you change the name of the Sun to 太陽, then it still means the Sun as the Sun is there. But I'm not talking about an objective truth. I'm talking about the word game. The hateful feminazi word game. If the concept is still there as you said, you can just call what you described "toxic femininity," as that kind of toxic expectation is also coming from females. If the concept is still there, why not change the word to toxic femininity? Just because feminists and their friends in the academia wan…
/r/MensRights19/09/23 11:17 AM
5

sorry about that, I commented to you accidentally
/r/MensRights19/09/23 10:59 AM
7

"Can I argue that the sun does not exist because I define the word 'sun' as a 5 meter tall toot fairy? Its nonsensical." You wrote this, then I ask, if I define toxic femininity as females being extremely entitled, can I call females who are selfish or entitled "toxic femininity" all the time? It's not about science. It is about the words and definitions. It is that kind of game. Unfortunately, feminazis won this conflict after the long battle against the Conservatives (at least at one point, fe…
/r/MensRights19/09/23 10:57 AM
1

"Can I argue that the sun does not exist because I define the word 'sun' as a 5 meter tall toot fairy? Its nonsensical." You wrote this, then I ask, if I define toxic femininity as females being extremely entitled, can I call females who are selfish or entitled "toxic femininity" all the time? It's not about science. It is about the words and definitions. It is that kind of game. Unfortunately, feminazis won this conflict after the long battle against the Conservatives (at least at one point, fe…
/r/MensRights19/09/23 10:57 AM
5

The Sun is an objective truth while feminazis' concepts are arbitrary and hateful. Should I accept Communism's concepts? Not at all. You're conflating two different things and it's a bullshit. Why call it toxic while feminazis reject the concept of toxic femininity? Plus, don't pretend like feminazis care about male suicide. https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/5stit3/feminism_is_about_equality_its_not_a_hate_movement/ your definition of the word is different from what people mean by it.…
/r/MensRights19/09/23 10:46 AM
5

That's my point. Men showing no emotion should not be called toxic masculinity. Why accept their words and definitions? If you connect the "western" traditional male stereotype with toxicity (see, showing no emotion itself is not toxic, there's an ill intention of feminists), then sure, it could be toxic but I highly disagree. (Example of toxic masculinity is "Never show any emotion")--------> My point is, I fundementally reject their definition. many people do not understand the difference betw…
/r/MensRights19/09/23 10:32 AM
7

I agree. Feminism works just like Putinism for some reason. As I said, even Nazism has a similar trait with feminism. Make words and definitions with a negative tone against your enemy, and then pretend there's no bad intention. Feminists use "equality" to brainwash people too. They say feminism is equality, while they know it's a lie. Let's say I support legal equality but I don't think there's such a thing as patriarchy and I believe the gender pay gap is not discrimination at all. Will femini…
/r/MensRights19/09/23 10:22 AM
3

I Just censored that word misogyxx.
/r/MensRights19/09/23 10:03 AM
3

Was that word coined by Conservative men? To insult feminine men as "toxic?" That's new to me. Could you give me a source?
/r/MensRights19/09/23 05:28 AM
9

I think you misunderstand my point. What I'm saying is, I reject their definitions and concepts.I'm not saying there's no toxic people in this world.
/r/MensRights19/09/23 05:17 AM
4

It doesn't. The thing is about their words and definitions. And internet? There're many female users who spout hateful speech against men. Should I call them toxic femininity? Desperate and toxic shut-ins? That's a problem of a few people. Also, more females have depression. It's not true that more men are mentally ill at all. Social stigma exists all around the world and the form of it is different in each country. For example, in USA, gay culture was a taboo back in the past, but Japan was dif…
/r/MensRights19/09/23 05:00 AM
7

Look at how men are treated in the western countries. Plus, many modern women are killing their babies too. I mean, bad things happen. So, should I call that toxic femininity too?
/r/MensRights19/09/23 04:49 AM
1

It seems like it's not even about having sex to them. So, the solution does not exist. What can eliminate depression? Mental therapy? I don't think so.
/r/MensRights18/09/23 10:13 AM
1

Wtf is this post? I do not accept that concept from the beginning. So the answer is neither no nor yes. If there are men identifying as incels, then I think they are brainwashed by women as that term was coined by a female, and being used as an insult against men. There's nothing wrong about going single. People above me talk about MGTOW, but there's no need to identify as such as they can just say they don't want females. The only reason behind why some men consider themselves MGTOW should be o…
/r/MensRights18/09/23 10:09 AM
5

We can become females by identifying as female. If you cannot defeat your enemy, just become it.
/r/MensRights18/09/23 09:58 AM
1

There're fewer female CEOs. Sure. But so what? Is it theirs? This is no more than Communist mindset. Communism is exactly the female mindset.
/r/MensRights18/09/23 09:51 AM
1

This is a house built by men, maintained by men, with male blood, male labor, and male money. Females have no place to assert their contribution.
/r/MensRights18/09/23 09:49 AM
6

As long as females get no voting right, I am okay with male only conscription.
/r/MensRights18/09/23 09:47 AM
44

Australian school forced their boys to apoligize to female students because they're male. Now modern females should apologize because they are killing 73 million babies every year by aborting them.
/r/MensRights18/09/23 09:44 AM
23

There's no Chad. That's an arbitrary concept. Plus, even super rich or handsome men get falsely accused of rape by their females. Chad? Alpha? That's a fantasy. Intersectional feminists are attacking men as a whole.
/r/MensRights18/09/23 09:43 AM
1

I disagree. Legal Equality and Equality are different. And females are extremely good at brainwashing men. Unfortunately, men have a high drive for sex, and many of them fall into the a trap made by females. Desperate men who want to have sex become slaves of modern females who know how to use their female card efficiently. If you prioritize equality before Legal equality, then anything can happen. Females will demand they don't wanna get arrested for revealing their breast, and they will demand…
/r/MensRights18/09/23 09:28 AM
3

It's up to you. If I were you, I would not be with that kind of female because I do not tolerate such things. If it was my boss, I'd have no choice but to ignore her, but it's not the case. Plus, females have never been oppressed. Men made all civilizations and women benefitted from them.
/r/MensRights18/09/23 09:19 AM
1

Feminists are not a sex or a race though. It is a dogma. If they preach about "killallmen," that is part of their dogma, religion. Many people believe feminism means equality, but it's a lie. They just use that word to sugercoat their religion. There is a typical pattern of feminists. A feminist: Are you a feminist? John: No A feminist: Do you believe in equality? John: Yes A feminist: then you're a feminist. Equality is nothing more than their dog whistle. I believe in legal equality. But I bel…
/r/MensRights18/09/23 02:21 AM
2

As I said, this is what I observed. If not, why do people make a small penis joke with no one to push back against it, but when there's an anti-female joke, people get mad and criticize the commenter? I can give you an example, on r/Polandball, r/politics and many other subreddits, I saw lots of that penis or small height joke against men. And in most cases there was no backlash. On the other hand, when a Redditor makes jokes against women (like, "that fat woman will become a cat lady in the fut…
/r/MensRights17/09/23 12:17 AM
2

Let's say, men get bodyshamed 100 times and women also get bodyshamed 100 times. Those are not real numbers, but I'm just giving you an example. In 80/100 cases, people fight against anti female bodyshaming. In 10/100 cases, people fight against anti male bodyshaming. That is what I observed. Does it mean men get bodyshamed more? Not in this case, but the treatment is different and people do have a double standard. I've seen Reddit rules regarding this. It was not specifically about bodyshaming,…
/r/MensRights16/09/23 11:57 PM
3

there's no way to quantify how many women bodyshame men compared to women Ans: Yes, but there is a double standard. You see small penis joke normalized while small boob joke is not. I'm talking about that double standard. Men getting insulted is not a concern of many people, at least compared to the case of women. It does not necessarily mean men get bodyshamed more. The thing is about the double standard. The link you posted moreso goes to show how the prison industrial complex is racist as it …
/r/MensRights16/09/23 11:23 PM
3

Huh, what double standard? Then make an insult against an ugly woman and see what happens on Reddit. Make another insult against men and compare the two. Even in real life, men getting insulted for having an ugly trait is often ignored while there's a constant "Oh You Can't Judge me Accept me I'm a real woman" Bullshit. Those women even want men to conform to their body ideal while not caring about men getting bodyshamed. I only saw men shitting on the females' appearance on a few subreddits, wh…
/r/MensRights16/09/23 10:54 PM
3

Talking about the double standard is meaningful. I didn't say women body shame men more at all, as it's impossible to quantify as you wrote. But the double standard is disgusting, is what I want to say. And yes, feminists always bring up female issues and want special privilege for only females, and I think it is important to talk about their double standard because they never cared about equality from beginning. Feminists also see everything as a competition between men and women, and I disagre…
/r/MensRights16/09/23 10:28 PM
1

But think about that, it's not good for men. Men lose their money and mental sanity when they're obsessed with Onlyfan whores. It's always a loss to men regardless if what happens in the market. The least expensive method I can imagine is, all men convert to jerkism and keep watching the same pornography to keep their money.
/r/MensRights16/09/23 08:52 PM
2

It's not that hard to find. Feminists did have protests like this in real life. And many reddit xxchromosome female users do upvote "I'm not gonna have sex with Conservative men," Unfortunately, sex has become a weapon because they regard it as goods which can be sold in the market.
/r/MensRights16/09/23 08:44 PM
33

They won't admit that, but definitely they do care about the sex market subconsciously. Feminists, let's be real. Feminists do represent modern females. Feminists often make "I'm not gonna have sex with you dirty men" protests, which shows they're using their sex as a weapon to attack men. Feminists, or some females attack men with slurs like incels, ugly, neckbeard or something like that. It's all related to the sexual market value. They want to keep men's value to the bottom while they try to …
/r/MensRights16/09/23 01:03 PM
11

Many modern men are just pick-me boys, at least according to this female standard. It's just sad and funny reality.
/r/MensRights16/09/23 12:55 PM
50

A great contradiction of entitled females: "women are not one monolith" --> "Those pickme girls are trying so hard to be like "I'm not like other girls" lol so stupid" ---> "Modern females have the right to bully modern men because, females in the past were discriminated, lol" Now, I ask, are you really not a monolith?
/r/MensRights16/09/23 12:53 PM
22

That doesn't sound that bad compared to that word. I think even "entitled modern females" sounds a lot worse than "gold digger." It does have a negative tone, but there's no stigmatization. Perhaps, we can call them femcels, but at this point, that word's meaning does not even mean anything. It's also important to notice that word was coined by a female, and being manipulated by females now. I saw female Redditors calling Elon Musk that word. That word does not have a real meaning. It's just "wh…
/r/MensRights16/09/23 12:49 PM
4

Honestly, that's not my concern. Don't get it wrong. I am a straight man. But I really don't care about women. I really mean it. What's the purpose of having a date? Having sex. If people make enough money, they can do that anyway. Prostitution is legal in Nevada, and all Americans can get a whore legally while in Nevada. For me, I just don't care that much about women. I'm just satisfied by being myself. I think lots of men lost self-control or the belief that they do not need women at all. If …
/r/MensRights16/09/23 11:54 AM
5

I don't think "educated women" are good for marriage though. I think in marriage, kindness is more important. The problem is, "submissive Asian women" is a joke and a lie. Lots of men believe this fake fantasy, falling into trap which is called "marriage." Like, don't expect too much things on marriage or females in general. I'd recommed them to just give it up as marriage is a failed gynocentric institution anyway. It doesn't work anymore. Plus, you just mentioned "below average height in USA",…
/r/MensRights16/09/23 10:49 AM
0

At this point, I'm okay with them hating on men, but at least they need to respect Our freedom of speech too. I mean, you reap what you sow. But they're different. They want to silence anti-female speech.
/r/MensRights16/09/23 10:43 AM
9

I second this. Men have been dying to maintain society. They die as soldiers, and the country exploit them to the deaths (like, 99%of the casualties at the workplace consists of men). There're respectable female soldiers, but they're a minority. There's no opression against women. Men cost men's life to maintain civilizations. Even worse, because they have to pay taxes for the welfare of females.
/r/MensRights16/09/23 10:41 AM
4

After I read your comment, I decided to use men and females more often.
/r/MensRights15/09/23 10:42 AM
9

Also, your defense is a bullshit. "Men did it first so women are just puching back?" Feminists, a.k.a females, have literally promoted extreme hatred against men. https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/5stit3/feminism_is_about_equality_its_not_a_hate_movement/ If men do the same bullshit like those feminists, women, then they'll 100% become crazy and insult those men with useless words. "WoMen are jUst doing what men Did because they did It FirSt" You want to play this game? Then you shoul…
/r/MensRights15/09/23 10:36 AM
6

It's just their projection. People can use females as females are females. People also don't hesitate to use "males." It's just another culture war victim mindset of females. They can femsplain yada yada yada, which basically means nothing more than how oppressed they're and how hurt they're. Like, ew no thanks. People call men males a lot of times. I usually don't do that, but I've seen lots of such people. Also, I don't care about snowflakes' feeling anymore. They don't care about mine, so tho…
/r/MensRights15/09/23 10:27 AM
5

It all comes down to self feeling of theirs while completely ignoring men's. But think about it. Why should I care about their feeling? They're literally saying killallmen, and they call men "potential criminals," which is nothing more than an ad hominem hasty generalization insult. I can call females females. Men and females? So be it. Men and females. I am sick and tired of listening to irrelevant fuckers.
/r/MensRights15/09/23 10:20 AM
4

I call females females. No problem with that
/r/MensRights15/09/23 10:16 AM
10

You're in a way lucky. There are men who have to live with hateful feminist females. At least she left by her own will and you don't have to deal with her anymore. I think seperation is the best solution to this kind of mess.
/r/MensRights21/07/23 10:26 AM
16

Toxic femininity. I didn't have a feminist sister (who knows, perhaps she's a feminist) but I've seen too many toxic women. Feminists and modern females call men potential "something bad," which is an ad hominem attack. Racists also call black men potential criminals, and feminists (and many women) do that against men. Race and sex are interwined and it shows feminists are nothing but a female version of racist. White Feather Movement is the evidence of toxic femininity. Feminism is just one of …
/r/MensRights21/07/23 10:24 AM
0

I want it to be banned. This is stupid as hell. A few females are exploiting men whose brain is not fully developed.
/r/MensRights08/07/23 04:59 AM
13

The same thing applies to many many men.
/r/MensRights08/07/23 04:57 AM
7

In the past, perhaps like 100 years ago, alimony "kind of" made sense because stay-at-home wives couldn't have a job after they divorce their husband. But now, not anymore. Plus, everyone knows divorced men will lose everything in the court. Ask any lawyers if you're gonna defeat your soon-to-be-divorced wife in the court. No matter who's at fault, men will lose 100%. So this is a complete bullshit. We need to eliminate the burden on men's shoulder.
/r/MensRights08/07/23 04:54 AM
1

That's a lie. "Women" or feminists do not care about low-paying jobs. They don't give a shit about "dirty work." Women, or biological females are not allowed to work in mines, but no women or feminists complain about it. Less women are working in the dangerous or underpaying jobs than men, contributing to the male casualties at the workplace, but feminists or modern women don't give a shit. It's all about power grabbing, more money more jobs for our kind mindset. That's why Affirmitive Actions s…
/r/MensRights08/07/23 04:42 AM
1

Men's Standard for an ideal partner (whether he's gay or not): being pretty+ kind (I think many men hate feminists or sjw types) Women's: Having at least an equal social status or a better than hers This creates the difference. I also think men do not like women earning too much money because there is a "bias" that such women demand a lot of things in the relationship.
/r/MensRights07/07/23 04:25 AM
2

There's no gender discrimination. The capitalists hire the best candidates for a job. They even hire undocumented workers for money. Women crying about discrimination is a joke. The capitalists or men do not owe women money and jobs. It's not yours. Why do they believe they deserve something just for being female?
/r/MensRights07/07/23 04:19 AM
7

To be honest, I also don't want to work. The only difference between me and women is that they can become stay-at-home wives 100 million times easier than me. If I was female, I wouldn't choose to work. It's kind of forced if you're a man. That being said, I disagree with all kinds of toxic feminists. There's no wage gap, and choosing to be a stay-at-home-mom is not something bad despite feminists' toxic dogma. The problem is feminists or modern females who complain about the wage gap or discrim…
/r/MensRights07/07/23 04:14 AM
3

I'm new to Reddit.
/r/MensRights05/07/23 02:32 AM
4

I think this should apply to all men. But sure, this could be a start.
/r/MensRights05/07/23 02:28 AM
3

That's the real issue. Imagine a father who has to feed his none-biological kids. Like, even if that father is a millionaire, that is insane
/r/MensRights05/07/23 02:27 AM
3

Plus, California was not even a slave state. And yeah, why should immigrants suffer from what they didn't even do?
/r/MensRights05/07/23 02:25 AM
1

I'm also not an African American, but I want this for all races.
/r/MensRights05/07/23 02:24 AM
3

Men do discriminate against men in favor of women. That is the nature of men, simping. Women-are-Wonderful-Effect proves my point. What you're saying does not make sense at all. Plus, I think even fathers who afford to pay should not be forced to pay the money.
/r/MensRights05/07/23 02:21 AM
1

Feminists make loads of excuses to defend their hate and death threat. One feminist who claims to be female (who knows if that's just a troll though) wrote that they can say that because it is fighting against patriarchy and they don't mean it. Like, fuck you. 1st of all, that hateful speech itself is psychotic. 2ndly, it means what they say does not mean what they say, which means they are liers. Hateful liers. What the fuck is this. Female manipulators? Isn't this what is called gaslighting? P…
/r/MensRights05/07/23 02:16 AM
5

Yeah that's the only difference. Systematic gynocentrism and the power that feminists and "women" hold in the society. But it's not like typing such words is illegal. Men can also write that, and the Police cannot arrest them as it is protected under freedom of speech. The biggest difference is whether social media platforms censor it or not.
/r/MensRights05/07/23 02:09 AM
1

I don't believe in this MGTOW ideology, as it seems too dogmatic, but I think it's not about sexual insecurity. It's more about self-defense mechanism. Today's culture made a hostile environment against men, and men are trying to understand how they should react to this hostile change. One of the methods is MGTOW. That's it.
/r/MensRights04/07/23 06:00 AM
1

Then stop worrying about his opinions and start focusing on your business. That's weak energy. Why should he or I give a fuck about your kind's opinion? Let's assume that I'm weak, or at least your kind thinks I'm weak. Fuck you? Why should I care? The problem with feminists is that they hold lots of power in this society controlling the politics and spreading anti male, anti white hate.
/r/MensRights04/07/23 05:52 AM
3

Carefully re-read my writing. How can feminists define masculinity however they want? Also, why can't I define toxic femininity as whatever I want it to be? They're playing with words as they're natural manipulators. That's what I'm talking about.
/r/MensRights03/07/23 09:31 AM
7

That's exactly what I'm talking about. Why can't I define that toxic femininity? Why should I accept their definition? Why should I give a fuck about those parasites? I'll call that toxic femininity.
/r/MensRights03/07/23 09:29 AM
8

You could have expected that though. What do you expect from modern "progressive" female singers? I mean, that's just obvious
/r/MensRights03/07/23 08:34 AM
6

I don't hear songs made by modern western singers because I don't wanna be angry. I want to be peaceful when I hear a song. I think the Japanese music is way better. or the Classic songs.
/r/MensRights03/07/23 08:32 AM
14

Jordan Peterson debate on the gender pay gap, campus protests and postmodernism https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=aMcjxSThD54
/r/MensRights03/07/23 05:49 AM
7

I like being alone, so I'm fine. I just worry about other men but realistically, there's nothing much I can do for them.
/r/MensRights03/07/23 05:45 AM
7

I don't have a specific definition of that word, perhaps I shouldn't have used that word. I just used that word because a lot of people use "feminists" and "(modern) women" interchangably and I am also confused about it. In one way, women and feminists are different, but people often treat them like the same. For example, when a person criticizes feminists, then feminists call them anti-women. But I probably should have worded carefully. Sorry about that.
/r/MensRights03/07/23 05:40 AM
–

Techinically, Selective Service is also a volunteer military system because there's no WW3. However, every country needs a system like that to prepare for an emergency. Like, what are feminists and SJWs gonna do if Russia invades Germany? Are they gonna shout "Microaggression" at Putin? But there should be some reward for that service. The voting right was that reward a long time ago, but not anymore. Women also have that while they're not under that duty.
/r/MensRights03/07/23 05:30 AM
15

There's way more options. You don't even have to listen to American music anyway. I don't even know who that is.
/r/MensRights03/07/23 04:40 AM
1

Then all female generals should be fired
/r/MensRights03/07/23 04:36 AM
45

Women can fight. End of the story. The problem started from the Suffregette movement. Modern women or feminists got all the rights (to vote, to kill their babies=abortion) without any consequences and responsibilities. No wonder why feminists don't want women under the draft. It's in a way, men's fault too. Because of the Women-Are-Wonderful-Effect, men let women get whatever they want without any responsibilities, and now men are suffering because of the Simps in the past. Feminists believe peo…
/r/MensRights03/07/23 04:24 AM
7

One feminist user just wrote this before it got banned for insulting other users. "Toxic masculinity is masculinity that is just toxic. If a woman perpretrates those ideas that's toxic masculinity. Not fuckin femininity because the ideas don't change no matter who says it. Anyone who thinks that "men can defend against women" is clearly perpetrating toxic masculinity for that reason." So I ask why can't I say "Toxic femininity is femininity that is just toxic. If a man perpretrates those ideas t…
/r/MensRights03/07/23 01:12 AM
3

Toxic femininity is femininity that is just toxic. If a man perpretrates those ideas that's toxic femininity. Not masculinity because the ideas don't change no matter who says it. Anyone who favors women and forces men to be soldiers is clearly perpetrating toxic femininity for that reason./s
/r/MensRights03/07/23 01:09 AM
2

Men and women both prefer women. That's what women are wonderful effect is about.
/r/MensRights03/07/23 01:06 AM
9

Perhaps some people can say MGTOW is hateful, as it is a subjective opinion, then what about feminists? Feminists define words deliberately to demonize men (such as toxic masculinity) while they deny the concepts against women such as toxic femininity or hypergamy. There is no reason to blame all the bad things they scream about on masculinity, but they just make a firm definition without any consideration of reality, and they deny their toxicity. Isn't abortion toxic femininity? Isn't infantici…
/r/MensRights03/07/23 12:50 AM
1

Nah I usually delete my comments after it's over. I thought our conversation was over
/r/MensRights02/07/23 10:18 PM
63

Ben Shxxxxx talked about this. There's a whole victim hierarchy in the west. Whites and men are automatically considered to have some special rights while that's not true. It's all the same thing. Liberals and feminxxts call that intersectionality, but intersectionality exists on their side in the name of the Victimhood Political Correcness. Being a special victim does not give you a special status. Of course, if there's a person who got harmed by someone else, he/she can sue that person, and pe…
/r/MensRights02/07/23 10:07 PM
1

You don't call someone who don't afford to buy Nintendo an "involuntary Nintendo none-buyer." That's what I'm talking about. If you name something with a negative nuance, then that word creates power and feminists are using that power against men. This is why I don't even admit the existence of them. Just like we don't call poor people who cannot buy Nintendo an "involuntary None-Nintendo buyer," I refuse that term and the definition of that term fundementally.
/r/MensRights02/07/23 10:38 AM
1

See what happened in California. California banned AA in 1990s, and the racial ratio changed drastically. But you're technically right. You still let them know your race and gender (even though you can make a lie) and they can discriminate against you. But things will change. Especially in the states where AA was in practice. The change could be small, but it will happen anyway.
/r/MensRights02/07/23 09:58 AM
–

I agree with you, because I know many mothers love their kids, however, assuming the worst when it comes to women is important. I think it can break down our ingrained gynocentrism. People assume the worst when it comes to men. So we need to balance it.
/r/MensRights02/07/23 09:38 AM
1

I fundementally don't believe the existence of them. I think that's just feminists' propaganda. Most men are fine with not having a girlfriend. At least I am fine with that. Men don't need women, and I have never felt I need them in my life (except for my mother, but I mean, she is different). Impersonate? Not at all. At least in my perspective it's impossible because that is just a feminist propaganda that men need women in their life. Women need men, so there are femcels, but men don't need wo…
/r/MensRights02/07/23 09:27 AM
3

Small cockroaches are not that bad actually. The problem is huge cockroaches. Also, you'd better ignore it. Trolls will troll you if you reply to them.
/r/MensRights02/07/23 08:22 AM
7

It is an NPC. Better to ignore it. I've had conversation with liberals, feminists, and many people who have different opinions from mine, and I concluded a hostile and arrogant "entitled female type" or a "whiteknight SJW type" person is not worth my time. It's better to just ignore them. They don't have good faith in the first place, they just say what they're told by their liberal feminist mastermind. They are NPCs. They're not real human beings. Just say Orange man bad and move on. They'll be…
/r/MensRights02/07/23 08:17 AM
27

I'm pretty young, and I have no interest in marriage. I don't even believe in true love. It's all lie to make men work harder and deliver their wealth to women. It all stems from animal instinct. I'm not sure if women can love men, and I don't even know if love is not just a fancy name to call "sexual desire." What's the point in marriage and dating? Just having sex? People will make a lie like "A man and a woman get along, share love, blah blah blah" but ultimately it's just a story of two anim…
/r/MensRights02/07/23 08:07 AM
1

That's a really distorted view. There are many great gay men who didn't give a shit about women. Straight men do like females, but many of the great male conquerors' goal was to get money and power, not to get a woman. There are men who like insects more than females, and there are men who like math more than women. Women are not the main force which made men to work harder.
/r/MensRights02/07/23 07:58 AM
–

idk, I wouldn't date a random woman. Perhaps it's just my thing. I've always wondered what is the goal of dating in the first place? Isn't it to have sex? If the emotional bond was the main goal, men can get along with other men. And of course women's goal of dating is to get a man who can provide her with sex, money, and so on. So it's all because of superficial animal instinct. I'm not that interested in dating as I think what I want from dating is only sex and if that's the case, what's the d…
/r/MensRights02/07/23 07:53 AM
7

Feminists sometimes say they help men too and DeSantis is the evidence showing why they're wrong. A Conservative figure, DeSantis is helping men while feminists are opposing to this decision. So it's like this. The Conservatives: 40% pro-male, 60% pro-female The liberals: 5% pro-male, 95% pro-female feminists: 100% pro-female
/r/MensRights02/07/23 07:18 AM
1

I think if DeSantis becomes the president, he will change the whole country, or maybe the whole world. He knows how to use the system and power. But objectively, the possibility of DeSantis becoming a president is really low, so it's just hope. At least he can change Florida.
/r/MensRights02/07/23 07:14 AM
2

DeSantis looks awesome. He is a great man, a great father, and a great politician.
/r/MensRights02/07/23 07:10 AM
5

That's the whole point of the political party though. Each party compete with others with their own selfish interests. They decorate their political party with some good good moral salespoints (like liberalism, conservatism, feminism, MRM, Green policy), but ultimately, the main goal of the party is to get what that party's supporters want.
/r/MensRights02/07/23 06:45 AM
3

It's a bullshit. Everyone knows men treat women well. They just dont like men so they're demonizing men's sexual orientation. That's all.
/r/MensRights02/07/23 06:42 AM
3

I mean, men also have a standard. Yes, there are desperate men, but many men do have a standard. They don't wanna have sex with a random stuff.
/r/MensRights02/07/23 06:39 AM
3

Not always. There are super ugly females.
/r/MensRights02/07/23 06:37 AM
4

The secret: There are females who are too ugly to make a boyfriend. It's not a joke. It's real. It doesn't have to do with feminism or anti male hate, but it seems like a lot of femcels do hate men and support feminism as expected. I've been to a website which is full of femcels and noticed all of them talk about men and how much they hate men. It gave me a weird feeling. In one way, yeah modern women hating on men is bad...... but on the other hand,........
/r/MensRights02/07/23 06:36 AM
6

What did he/she say?
/r/MensRights02/07/23 06:20 AM
60

It's a scary time. There's no wonder why people use "sex agreement" application before they have sex (I think that was a thing in Denmark). But even when they use it, if a woman accuses a man of violence, then things get spicy. There's no way to go around it.
/r/MensRights02/07/23 06:18 AM
4

The Republican Party at least sometimes does a small good thing for men. Just, sometimes, but it's way better.
/r/MensRights02/07/23 06:13 AM
8

Lol let's just abolish marriage then. It was once a traditional institution where men can be the leader of the household (instead they had to bear all responsibilities), but now it's just a misandrist animal farm. The modern world removed the men's leadership role in the household as a wife is no longer a property, but weirdly, they didn't get rid of the male responsibilities as the "leader of the house."
/r/MensRights02/07/23 03:36 AM
6

I mean......why do women deserve to get any of that....
/r/MensRights02/07/23 03:33 AM
6

It's not her money!!!
/r/MensRights02/07/23 03:29 AM
1

Why should white men and Asians have a higher score at SAT than other racial groups? That is discrimination. About Johnny's case, it depends. If that teacher wrongly scores that student, it should be corrected. However, "hateful bullying of that teacher" cannot be an excuse to give him a pass into a MedSchool. That discriminates against other competitors. Well, things happen. We don't know what happened to each person and we cannot assume that person had a bad time just because he/she is of a ce…
/r/MensRights02/07/23 03:23 AM
1

Isn't that abliest? lol I mean, if you start a victim game, why can't mentally ill people demand some peices of the pie?
/r/MensRights02/07/23 03:20 AM
1

Oh now I undestand what you were talking about. I imagined a feminist teacher giving an F even when a male student does great on the test. I was talking about that. If, a feminist teacher bullies male students and if that affects them, it's a sad story, and that feminist teacher should be punished, but those male students shouldn't be given a special right like an AA. That was why we didn't understand each other. I was just talking about "correcting the wrongly graded test scores" not the whole …
/r/MensRights02/07/23 03:16 AM
1

Plus, SAT score is objective. If you go by "oh racism affects everything" attitude, then mentally ill people who cannot do the basic math should also be given an opportunity to get into a MedSchool and that's a bullshit.
/r/MensRights02/07/23 03:13 AM
1

You need to realize what you said was a lie first
/r/MensRights02/07/23 03:11 AM
1

Meh, we are just different. Let's leave it at that. But the Supreme Court ruled that AA is unconstitutional, and 73% of Americans believe it should be gone. The problem with what you're saying is, that is too much of victimization without any proof and it cateforizes whole race into some sad victimized creature. It's all useless. I believe only competent people deserve something
/r/MensRights02/07/23 03:10 AM
1

"Thats not getting kicked out. Again without AA those people still wouldn't be accepted. That "piece of pie" would either not get filled up at all or go to someone rich who paid their way in. Let me ask you this. Are you against rich people being able to pay their way into medschool?" -----> A lie
/r/MensRights02/07/23 03:08 AM
1

What do you want? The number of white students and Asians accepted after the ban of AA in Cali is enough proof. Let's just agree to disagree it's getting too heated
/r/MensRights02/07/23 03:02 AM
1

They had to get a higher score to overcome that personality score, and AA. Think about it. There is a UC blah University. UCBlah wants to have 10000 students this year. Oh AA is in practice. We need to give minorities higher scores so that they can overcome racism. Minorities got higher scores thanks to those kind liberals. So without AA, the number of minorities would have been like 3000, but with AA, now it is 5000! So what happens to white men? The number of white students accepted deopped fr…
/r/MensRights02/07/23 02:57 AM
1

[So why is hard working black and Latino people not being accepted because of systemic racism not discrimination to you?] ------> lower grades, getting rejected. That is a fair rule. Having a certain skin color should not be a factor [But white and Asian people taking all the "pieces of the pie" thanks to their generation wealth isn't?] --------> As I said, many of them are not rich, and they got accepted thru their own effort.
/r/MensRights02/07/23 02:53 AM
1

Just see what happened in California. More white men could get into good colleges thanks to the ban of AA. So what you said was proven to be a lie
/r/MensRights02/07/23 02:48 AM
1

Affirmitive Action created an unfair environment. It hurts, I know. But the wrongs should be corrected. Also I didn't say that. I just said Asians have culture of Law and Order (especially the Japanese), which contributes to a lower crime ratio than that of all Americans. That's what I said. And like I said, I am not for banning CRT. I just don't like that. Perhaps teachers can be more sensitive when teaching history about slavery and racism. It is important to learn from history, but I have met…
/r/MensRights02/07/23 02:42 AM
1

There are many white and Asian students who have to get a part time job to pay for the tuition. My accounting professor is a white man, and he had to have 3 jobs to pay for the college tuition. It's not that all whites and Asians are rich so they can get into good colleges easily. Meritocracy is to way to go.
/r/MensRights02/07/23 02:33 AM
1

[Wait. So you see the population of black and Latino students dropping 40% as a positive as long as it's filled with more Asian and white students? What about you wanting more cultural education?] ------> Neutral. However, this proves that AA was an obstacle that white men and Asians had to overcome. It is by defition, discrimination. [What about you wanting more cultural education?] ------> Again, a good high school teacher can make a good student. Students don't have to be in a MedSchool or to…
/r/MensRights02/07/23 02:25 AM
1

Different treatment depending on the race of a certain person, at least that's what I think of.
/r/MensRights02/07/23 02:21 AM
1

This proves my points. It is discrimination against whites and Asians. More whites and Asians got into great colleges thanks to the ban of AA.
/r/MensRights02/07/23 02:12 AM
1

It's really annoying to find all the sources but here. https://www.npr.org/2023/06/30/1185226895/heres-what-happened-when-affirmative-action-ended-at-california-public-colleges In 1996, California voters approved Proposition 209, an affirmative action ban at public universities in the state. Before the ban, UC Berkeley and UCLA were roughly representative of the California high school graduate population who were eligible for enrollment at universities, according to Zachary Bleemer, an economist…
/r/MensRights02/07/23 02:07 AM
1

[It's really not lol. You're acting like it's a black and white system that says "are you a POC, yes? Okay you're in" it factors in all sorts of things like adoption.] -----> Red Herring. [Again nobody is being discriminated against lol.] ------> If I have to work harder to get into MedSchool because of my race, that's discrimination. [Lol yes they do. Now you're just being dishonest. Being poor is the highest correlation with crime. Japan as years of crime control such as guns being banned. But…
/r/MensRights02/07/23 01:57 AM
1

[And how was him being white cause that to happen?] -----> I didn't say that. What I'm saying is, white and Asian students should not be discriminated because of the out-of-school racism. Exactly. And with AA they can get said education lol. Or making college free or student loans at least not have interest. -------> No. Anyone can be a "cultured man" if he is educated by a good teacher. It doesn't have to be about Medical school or colleges. [Okay and? They are accepted if they have a good scor…
/r/MensRights02/07/23 01:46 AM
1

Prove it.
/r/MensRights02/07/23 01:39 AM
1

Just one social experiment
/r/MensRights02/07/23 01:39 AM
1

[So people who don't abuse the system should be punished because of racist white people? Do you not see how racists are still the problem? Also I thought you wanted white people included?] ------>This is really messy dude. Are a half black half white man a black man or a white man? Why should a half Asian be discriminated because of his half Asian blood? 2.[Again it's kept under the rug for Asian communities because they keep to themselves and they aren't over policed. Also it takes money to com…
/r/MensRights02/07/23 01:08 AM
1

Plus, there is no racist indoctrination. This is a free country, and anyone can think for themselves. Even many CCP Chinese are against the Chinese govenment (I heard it from a Chinese immigrant) despite indoctrination. Human beings are not NPCs.
/r/MensRights02/07/23 12:54 AM
1

[Lol you already agreed with the felony analogy. That happens outside of school and would impact someone's ability to go to college. It sounds like you're being willfully ignorant here.] ------> Anything can impact it, dude. If John drives a car at night and has a car accident having a brain surgery, even though he is a rich white kid, he's not gonna make into great college. 2.[And how does that fix systemic racism in said schools?] ----> The problem is Culture. Anti-intellectualism can be remov…
/r/MensRights02/07/23 12:44 AM
1

I'm talking about the whole American population. And race being a factor on admission is not something people want.
/r/MensRights02/07/23 12:39 AM
1

[Like I said it's about acting as respectable as possible. It's left over from the days when they DIDN'T say what race they were on applications.] ------> I believe most whites, Asians, and hispanics are respectable. I got white friends from my college, and they didn't act rudely. Of course, most people were the same except for a few idiots. 2.[So the problem is white people lying? How is that AA's problem? That's again just racist white people lol] -----> Yeah, that is a problem. People use the…
/r/MensRights02/07/23 12:33 AM
1

....... Even though black people, hispanic people, Asian people do not want that, you believe what you're saying is an absolute justice and they're all stupid. When someone does not want your help, you should not become their savior. You're just insulting the whole Americans and people of color that they cannot even critically think.
/r/MensRights02/07/23 12:20 AM
1

[They're all connected. Which you later agreed with me on the felony topic. That's why AA exists. To take in account ALL racial issues. Not just a single racist teacher.] --------> And I disagree with that. Experiencing discrimination outside school cannot be a reason for an unfair admission. [I agree. But they still aren't solved. What's your plan to fix systemic racism? Since you don't want AA.] ------> People can make more schools and increase the school funding. However, AA is an unfair prac…
/r/MensRights02/07/23 12:14 AM
1

I mean... Americans are not that stupid. What you're saying sounds like white Americans, African Americans, Asian Americans, Hispanic Americans are all indoctrinated by racists.... and it's impossible.
/r/MensRights01/07/23 11:49 PM
1

Students literally let the college they're applying to know what race they are. They cannot "act white," whatever that means... when you apply for a college, you tell them if you're a white, an Asian, an African American, or a hispanic. (for example, one Democrat congresswoman identified as a native American even though she was a white. She wanted to benefit from AA) And if this ridiculous trend continues, anyone can assume that it's because of the racial vetting admission system. And it's weird…
/r/MensRights01/07/23 11:43 PM
1

I also wanna add that Asian Americans' political power is extremely weak and yet many of them succeeded. Asians representation in the U.S Congress is extremely underrepresented, yet it didn't become a factor to stop them from becoming successful. They worked hard to get out of poverty (despite the myth, many Asian immigrants were poor when they first came to the U.S). It also applies to African Americans, Hispanics, LGBT, and poor whites. If they try hard, they can overcome difficulties. And the…
/r/MensRights01/07/23 09:53 PM
1

[Which is what AA is. You agree with AA. Since realistically you can't stop every single bit of racial discrimination since it's so deeply embedded in society, that's why it's called systemic racism, you factor in that when it comes to acceptances.] ------>No I don't. I just believe mis-grading should be corrected. Again, you're overlapping other racial issues with unfair grading. [Why not? If a judge gives a black person a felony but let's a white person off with probation for the same crime th…
/r/MensRights01/07/23 09:00 PM
1

It's not racists that hate AA. 73% of Americans hate AA. The progressive Californians hate AA. The New Yorkers hate AA. AA was already illegal in many U.S states even before this ruling. If you think being against AA is racist just like the "racist Supreme Court," you're basically calling 73% of Americans including people of color are racist. Even a lot of African Americans, Asians, Hispanics, and whites do not support AA. That's where 73% comes from.
/r/MensRights01/07/23 08:03 PM
1

Huh... white men somehow got downvoted alongside with Asians but if a person of color "act white," then he can get a higher personality than real whites. Listen, this happens with Medical School score, IV League personality scores, and so on. This "Asian< white men< Hispanics< African American" pattern is observed in many cases. Nobody can fool others that AA is not a factor which causes this. And no, that's a bs. In your theory, white colleges should grant white men the best personality score, …
/r/MensRights01/07/23 07:59 PM
1

73% of Americans say race, ethnicity should not factor into college ... https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2019/02/25/most-americans-say-colleges-should-not-consider-race-or-ethnicity-in-admissions/ .......If there was an unfair grading, then it should be corrected. So if a misandrist or racist teacher gives a student F just because of the gender or the race of that student, it should be corrected. However, if it means that having experienced discrimination in his life itself should be the …
/r/MensRights01/07/23 07:52 PM
1

It's also important to note that 70% of Americans do not want Race as a factor when it comes to admission or hiring. Californians, New Yorkers, and many other U.S states made AA illegal even before this ruling. Even the leftist, progressive Californians hate AA and the effort to re-introduce it failed because the Californians voted against that. After the ban of AA in California, as anyone could have expected, Asians' ratio skyrocketted. Pretending AA is not discrimination is dishonest. I saw ma…
/r/MensRights01/07/23 06:41 AM
1

Think about it. Asian students got downvoted to hell on their personality score, and then white men, then hispanics, and then black men in that order. This is not discrimination? Then what is? Everyone knows it is discrimination and that's why Wikipedia calls it "positive discrimination."
/r/MensRights01/07/23 06:22 AM
1

The Supreme Court had 3 racists put onto it's council. They don't care about constitutionality anymore. They only care about pushing an agenda. You seriously think that judges appointed by an openly racist person isn't going to be biased? -------> Red Herring Also they're not picking people solely based on race. The fact you think that tells me you don't understand what AA is. --------> The fact that they care about the race on admission and whites and Asians have to suffer itself is discriminat…
/r/MensRights01/07/23 06:19 AM
1

I'm gonna be mad at people who support AA, but at least I respect honest ones. If someone just says "I know that discriminates against Asians and whites, but we need that" then I would disagree, but think he is honest. The seats at the medical school and IV league are limited. If someone gets in, someome gets kicked out. Asians and white men clearly experience discrimination because of AA.
/r/MensRights01/07/23 06:11 AM
1

https://www.aei.org/carpe-diem/new-chart-illustrates-graphically-racial-preferences-for-blacks-and-hispanics-being-admitted-to-us-medical-schools/ https://www.nytimes.com/2018/06/15/us/harvard-asian-enrollment-applicants.html
/r/MensRights01/07/23 06:08 AM
1

You keep pretending like AA is not discrimination when it clearly is. Choosing a person based on the race itself is unfair and crazy. The Supreme Court ruled that AA is discrimination against Asians and whites, and at this point, anyone who denies that is a lier. At least be honest. Why make a lie?
/r/MensRights01/07/23 06:04 AM
1

Not at this time, but you can try this. https://www.aei.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/med-1.png?x91208
/r/MensRights01/07/23 06:01 AM
0

Why should the whole diverse Asian group be categorized as one monolith that should be discriminated? Poor Asian immigrants from a poor Asian country had to struggle way more than natural born Americans. Also stop lying. There was a leaked document from one university and they deliberately scored Asians lower than other races. edit: you said "positive" so I was talking about that, but sure I'll correct that. I saw a wikipedia definition of AA, and it mentioned "positive discrimination."
/r/MensRights01/07/23 05:59 AM
0

There is no "positive" discrimination. Also slavery was over a long time ago. Nobody in the US experienced slavery. Think about it. If a poor Asian/ white man studies hard and gets rejected because of AA, isn't that cruel? That is basically what looting is. Why should they be discriminated because of their race? Also, why categorize the whole diverse Asian groups (Indians, Pakistan people, Japanese, Koreans, Chinese...) into one group and deliberately steal their seats? AA is not only discrimima…
/r/MensRights01/07/23 05:50 AM
8

Every movement, even far right/ left movements have a few good people. Even a Nazi saved a lot of Chinese from the Najing massacre. However, their existence confuse people and lead more to their hateful movement. Hermann Goering's brother saved some Jews and there were Nazis who helped the Jews to run away. But ultimately, they were still part of the great evil, and they were the force which contributed to the mass atrocity.
/r/MensRights01/07/23 05:42 AM
6

Hmm... I think having a mental illness cannot be an excuse. There was a feminist female who shot 3 men (she wrote "destory the men" before she did that). And she was sent to the hospital instead of the jail. But it is obvious that she had a normal life before that, and she was just hateful being who could kill innocent men for bullshit reason. Her anti man feminism contributed to that mass shooting.
/r/MensRights01/07/23 05:33 AM
2

I respect you. That's what I want to be. AA was a terrible idea from the beginning. Now it's time to correct the wrongs.
/r/MensRights01/07/23 05:25 AM
0

You're ignoring reality. There were students who got into college thanks to AA, and they couldn't even do the basic math. They didn't know anything about Algebra, they had to take all the elementary-school level courses. Don't ignore reality. AA is a failed experiment, and looting.
/r/MensRights01/07/23 05:19 AM
1

Ah, and if physical damage is all you and your kind cares about, then men sexually harrasing females without getting violent is ok? (touching female butt won't cause much physical harm) At least don't be hypocritical.
/r/MensRights01/07/23 12:37 AM
2

This is why female/ feminists' "male violence is worse than female violence because men can defend against females" is a lie. Females can harm men and females' violence should be criticized. One user on this Subreddit said men can defend against females because of the physical strength, but no it's not. Plus, if you don't respect others and attack them, being a female or being a weak does not make you an excuse. Females who initiate violence should face the consequence, and female criminals shou…
/r/MensRights01/07/23 12:30 AM
1

This is why female/ feminists' "male violence is worse than female violence becaus emen can defend against females" is a lie. Females can harm men and females' violence should be criticized. One user on this Subreddit said men can defend against females because of the physical strength, but no it's not. Plus, if you don't respect others and attack them, being a female or being a weak does not make you an excuse. Females who initiate violence should face the consequence, and female criminals shou…
/r/MensRights01/07/23 12:27 AM
6

I mean, I personally don't like that since it feels like men are surrendering to hateful women. Why care about them in the first place? Let's break it down logically. First, this is a hasty generalization fallacy. Second, this is ad hominem as no one should be guilty by association (if not, modern women are potential baby killers) thirdly, this is a causal fallacy as there is legal discrimination against men. So yeah, I don't think that phrase is ideal
/r/MensRights01/07/23 12:23 AM
4

Ignore her. That's the best you can do. Or call the Police before she calls them.
/r/MensRights01/07/23 12:20 AM
1

Also you talked about equality and you are somewhat justifying female violence against men. True equality, right? This is why I don't believe in equality that you and your kind are talking about. I'm gonna ask you what if men cannot defend against females? Should they be ashamed because of you and your kind? Your kind's "equality" is a lie. You and your kind are normalizing violence against men with tons of bullshit. There was an incident that 3 female insects killed one adult man. How are you g…
/r/MensRights01/07/23 12:14 AM
1

Not at all. Females can attack men with a weapon, and the physical difference is nothing. Also, attack on others itself is a declaration of hostility, and being a female cannot give them a pass. If you attack someone, then you need to expect retaliation even if you are an entitled female. Jordan Peterson also talked about that. Men cannot defend against females because of the social taboo like you and your kind are making. Being physically weak or strong does not matter. Females can have a weapo…
/r/MensRights01/07/23 12:12 AM
1

"Equality" is not an absolute justice, though. Even feminists don't believe in that. They want some animals more Equal than others. Equality is an illusion. That is what made Affirmitive Action, hate against men and whites, and so much suffering and looting. Meritocracy is the way to go. Nobody should belive in equality. And I'm not a Muslim by the way. I'm saying this as I'm against political correctness and hypocritical liberal "equality."
/r/MensRights01/07/23 12:07 AM
1

AA was banned, but it's only about the race. So the female quota and female privilege is not gone.
/r/MensRights01/07/23 12:01 AM
2

It is important to say that nobody should be discriminated because of their race or sex. Like, if a poor Asian studies hard and get a good grade but fails because of the AA, that is pure cruelty and discrimination. Liberals pretend like Asian applicants having the worst personality score (and then white men, hispanics, and black people in that order) at Harvard is not about discrimination even though it clearly shows the entire group of one race was downvoted to hell and the only racial group do…
/r/MensRights30/06/23 06:22 AM
7

I oppose to Affirmitive Action as it discriminates against men, white people and Asians, but yeah they're gonna do whatever they want. Even the leftist Californians voted against AA. This is important. Tha CaliForNians rejected the AA. So AA was already illegal in California. People hate that. And yet some hateful racists wanna force this on others
/r/MensRights30/06/23 05:33 AM
3

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/men-women-prison-sentence-length-gender-gap_n_1874742
/r/MensRights30/06/23 05:29 AM
2

Really? Oh no it's really tricky. I was glad since I thought the gender quota was over but it was just a dream?
/r/MensRights30/06/23 05:28 AM
1

I also think their main problem is not about having sex with females either. That's not their issue. I think they are MADE like that by feminists, gynocentrists, some men and women. For some reason, females use their sex as a weapon to attack men. Feminists call men that word, modern females make a "I'm not gonna have sex with men" strike. They want to make "incels." Modern women want them. They need that for their propaganda that Female sex is superior. This is a cultural weapon that a few mode…
/r/MensRights28/06/23 09:29 AM
7

I think this is because of the Gynocentrism and feminism at the same time. By nature, men and women prefer women to men, so females have more privilege than men. When men suffer, women and men ridicule them, calling them losers, potential criminals or whatever hateful ad hominem they can think of (it's what KKK did to the Black men, feminists and gynocentrists are basically re-branding of the KKK) But when women suffer, men are guilty by association and we need to get rid of white European beaut…
/r/MensRights28/06/23 09:19 AM
4

This is a different topic, but there are feminist females who call men all the bad things such as potential criminals et cetera. They ignore "innocent until proven guilty" of the law while using the law to demonize men. That is nothing more than a racist tactic used by the past racists to demonize a certain race. Feminists are a modern KKK. They're using hateful ad hominem, guilty by association profiling against men just to "win." They are blaming men for being men, and that's why they're justi…
/r/MensRights23/06/23 06:46 PM
3

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/men-women-prison-sentence-length-gender-gap_n_1874742 A new study by Sonja Starr, an assistant law professor at the University of Michigan, found that men are given much higher sentences than women convicted of the same crimes in federal court. The study found that men receive sentences that are 63 percent higher, on average, than their female counterparts.
/r/MensRights23/06/23 06:41 PM
1

They are literally living in a civilization created by men. So who is a "bleeding" parasite here? Paper, cars, tampoons, planes, the countries, colleges, all of them were invented by men. Those parasites didn't contribute anything to this civilization.
/r/MensRights10/06/23 09:33 AM
1

We overturned Roe V Wade. Now we need to make abortion illegal even in a case of rape and incest. It already happened in Florida, and I believe we can. We can still legally crush those motherfxxkers. Let's see who wins in the end. We are gonna ban all abortion and stop them from making their "reproductive choice," a.k.a murder.
/r/MensRights08/06/23 10:23 PM
-6

We overturned Roe V Wade. Now we need to make abortion illegal even in a case of rape and incest. It already happened in Florida, and I believe we can. We can still legally crush those motherfxxkers. Let's see who wins in the end. We are gonna ban all abortion and stop them from making their "choice," a.k.a murder.
/r/MensRights08/06/23 10:19 PM
1

Is she a train? Just asking... Btw, don't femsplain to men and go f yourself.
/r/MensRights08/06/23 10:17 PM
1

I doubt it. But at least it doesn't favor women.
/r/MensRights08/06/23 02:40 AM
1

I think people don't distinguish the difference between the culture and the race. It's understandable, but it's not true. Plus, even Asian women who are from Asia may not be feminine nor obedient. That's just a myth. Asian mail-order-brides only marry their western/ East Asian husbands to get money. Race is just about the skin color, and the mindset is a completely different story
/r/MensRights08/06/23 02:38 AM
1

Men who say that are extremely dellusional. I understand where they're coming from, but that's just not true. All females are the same. The only difference between Asian/ African and white females is the skin color. "Asian women obedient" myth is outdated and there are many who hate men. And Asian women who Look obedient might not be that obedient after they get married.
/r/MensRights08/06/23 02:33 AM
5

There was a female feminist on this sub, saying men are potential criminals. And then she was like "lol, I didn't even say all men are." All people are innocent until proven guilty, and no man is potential something. This is a KKK demonizing tactic, and ad hominem. Even real criminals who committed a crime spends time in jail, and after that they're free to go, even they are innocent until proven guilty. By the same logic, modern women kill 73 million babies every year, so they should be called …
/r/MensRights08/06/23 02:27 AM
3

I'm always curious why man hating females want to live in a civilization created by men. Can't you just leave? It's not even yours.
/r/MensRights08/06/23 02:16 AM
4

I don't think he is a good role model, however, I have no problem with him saying something "bad" about some women. Women do that all the time against men. Men also have freedom of speech. I don't fight for female rights, female brainwashing tactics, or female emotions. Even though they are actively treating men as their enemies, they want me to care about them. This is crazy.
/r/MensRights06/06/23 01:07 AM
5

That is a guilty by association, demonizing tactic. The words coined by the Cultural leftists such as feminists are nothing but meaningless attacks against the men. The claims from them are usually illogical tactics to shut men down (they're trying to shut men down with "mensplaining," while they keep femsplaining to men et cetera) and nothing useful or logical comes from those "people." Red Herring, Ad Hominem, Guilty by association Fallacy, Fallacy of Equivocation, Appeal to authority Fallacy,…
/r/MensRights06/06/23 01:04 AM
1

I'm a straight man, and I like Conservative gays one million times more than women and straight guys. I'm honestly surprised how hateful and deceitful modern women are. All they can do is spread hate and attack men, shame men and then pretend to be a victim. They are masters of Red Herring. I learned about logical fallacies all because of female feminists who were trying to deceive me. This is insane.
/r/MensRights05/06/23 08:57 AM
0

I didn't read it, and I don't want to, but do all you want. Just don't come close to men. I think that's alright. I learned that sometimes, it's better for people to be seperated. Especially when it comes to... these "people."
/r/MensRights05/06/23 08:53 AM
3

It's funny to see females femsplaining about what men should and shouldn't do while they're crying about mensxxxining. A typical hypocripsy. This is what North Korea does to their enemies. They promise peace, and then they attack. Feminists claim men shouldn't talk about females while they always talk about why men are bad. This is just a Cultural war. It's not about facts, logic, and science. It's all about ideology. Women and feminists don't want to hear the facts when they hurt their feelings…
/r/MensRights05/06/23 08:50 AM
9

I've seen feminist females who are desperately trying to silence men who were saying "female fertility more rapidly decline than that of men." It is a scientific fact that females do not produce infinite egg cells while men produce sperms until they die, and female fertility rate is declining much more rapidly than that of the men. She then tried to silence others with vague feminist bullshits like stop mansaining about female fertility rate to women... Lol then why are feminists or females fems…
/r/MensRights05/06/23 06:30 AM
1

I saw a feminist female on this sub (at least it claimed so) and she called men potential criminals while she believed men should support feminism. Calling a group of people that is ad hominem hate, and when you think about it, modern females are killing 73 million babies every year. She replied to me, "lol is it a lie?" Well, yeah that's exactly why people become disgusted at those rats. KKK have been calling black men potential criminals for decades, it is a typical profiling ad hominem hate. …
/r/MensRights04/06/23 12:05 PM
7

Even though I'm not a Conservative myself, I support overturning Roe V Wade for that reason. I see this a Culture war. They don't see us human beings, so yeah we get to oppose them.
/r/MensRights27/05/23 04:58 AM
11

That's why I oppose to any kinds of rules or suggestions given by them. There must be some bad intentions even when it seems okay on paper. I know they're sick a-holes. FTN advocates say women should be able to show their nipples while they say seeing womens nipples is rude and you shouldn't do that. You wanna change the social taboo for your dogma, but you wanna keep another social taboo attached to that? That's what's called Ad Hoc Cherrypicking. If nipple showing stops being a sexual taboo, t…
/r/MensRights27/05/23 04:52 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter