TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Expert_Profession951 Archive

View 1 post and 462 comments by Expert_Profession951 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

No, I brought up that men like you think sex ruins women. That’s what I just said. But I don’t think that, so 1. You’re lying and still can’t prove your point 2. Therefore yes, that statement started with you. So still no argument… Heck, you tried to assert that even my wife is “ruined” and yet couldn’t back it up, then I asked you about it twice more and you still dodged the question. What’s really sick is your inability to argue. Lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/26 05:25 PM
1

You need to do some medical research.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/26 05:21 PM
1

Healthy experienced women do not usually bleed. Their bodies have experienced the situation enough that they automatically lubricate better and have adapted to the situation. They also already have shed that epithelial tissue on the surface by having already experienced the friction of a penis. Bleeding is actually caused by other things as well, not just tears. And you answered your own question: virgins are more likely to tear due to less preparation (previous experience allowing the body to r…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/26 02:33 PM
2

You did. Lol YOU’RE the one lying. Anybody can scroll up and see it. Another insult? So you’re telling on yourself again… Ahhh… You STILL have no argument and keep trying to insult me, even after you admitted that’s what people do when they have no argument. Still zero evidence or valid argument in your post, only failed attempted insults. You’re not right, and you show it yourself. Lol o love it
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/26 02:22 PM
1

In nature, the best of the most adaptable and best traits survive and get opportunities to pass on their genes. If you aren’t in that group, complaining about it definitely isn’t going to help you. Lol It’ll only make it worse tbh bc now more women can see your desperation. Keep throwing yourself under the bus.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/26 12:27 AM
3

Then having a family would break your wallet and burn it, so the women are smart to exclude you from consideration. You’re right where you need to be.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/26 12:11 AM
9

The fact that many men here pretend like this isn’t even a natural thing, is only “cultural,” or doesn’t exist is sad. Or they’re just stupid. Probably both. Well no wonder they have issues getting women.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/26 11:58 PM
1

I’m guessing the first part offended you? Lol If that’s not the case, then 1. you replied to the wrong comment, and 2. it makes no sense here bc incels are so desperate they wouldn’t care if she’s a hoe. Can’t demand a woman that has lived the life of a nun before Meeting you when you haven’t exactly been a monk yourself Idk what planet you live on, but on Earth this sounds hilarious. We have high-value men (say, the top 10%) who do this all the time constantly. And they succeed, too, bc we have…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/26 11:11 PM
2

It’s all there. You’re the one who was saying I said things I didn’t say. I never accused you of saying something you didn’t say right here in black and white. All you’ve done is take tangents and try to insult me when I called you out. And I didn’t say - or “admit” - that. Again, falsely accusing me. You have no actual argument so just use these useless techniques and keep telling on yourself. Not once in all this have you presented any evidence for a point contrary to the OP.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/26 11:02 PM
1

^ Told on yourself again. “I have no argument so I’ll just try to insult him even when I know I can’t.”
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/26 01:11 PM
2

This. Younger and nurturing/mother material is what we care about. A woman with an MD-PhD is older and probably less family-oriented, or she would’ve had kids already. Pretty much any man will take a younger less educated woman who has better potential as a mother any day.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/26 01:37 AM
1

⁠I said sex doesn’t ruin women; their decisions do. You agreed at that point and pointed out certain negative qualities that make a man a bad partner and demonstrating how that hurts the woman. This contradicts that at first you disagreed with me and claimed I was saying sex ruins women, which is ridiculous. You can put words in my mouth all you want. It’ll never be what I actually said or believe. Sex does not ruin women. See a therapist. You haven’t explained how I’m wrong. Lol You actually fa…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/26 12:50 AM
1

I said sex doesn’t ruin women; their decisions do. You agreed at that point and pointed out certain negative qualities that make a man a bad partner and demonstrating how that hurts the woman. This contradicts that at first you disagreed with me and claimed I was saying sex ruins women, which is ridiculous. You can put words in my mouth all you want. It’ll never be what I actually said or believe. Sex does not ruin women. See a therapist. You haven’t explained how I’m wrong. Lol You actually fai…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/26 10:43 PM
2

Depends on your partner’s views. If he has a cuck fetish or wants a more open relationship where you f other guys then no you’re not a hypocrite. What would make you a hypocrite is if both you and your partner don’t want a cheating partner but you decide to cheat. His point is pretty plain. It’s not rocket science.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/26 10:32 PM
1

Then your beliefs are very different from mine, and mine are backed by plenty of evidence. But you are free to believe as you wish. There are people who still believe the earth is flat 🤷‍♂️ lol The majority =/= all. Your mistake was in assuming I’m against her having sex at all when it’s a matter of the wisdom in choices she makes. Again, that’s your take. You’re actually the outlier on that one, as again is evidenced by research. Delayed gratification works but is very uncommonly practiced due …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/26 06:51 PM
1

You’re not an outlier. Many, if not most people can bond with their partners after a reasonable number of previous partners. According to research, increase in partners correlates with decrease in bonding abilities. You were the one trying to assert I have bonding issues. Now you’re taking that back? Lmao. You back up fast. and I never said anything like that You asserted that somehow I’m a “worse partner.” You wouldn’t seriously date the woman you supposedly love if she had a boyfriend before s…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/26 06:16 PM
1

You should see a physician. If one of my patients reported that to me I’d refer her to the specialist. Have you ever taken the USMLE? No? Then I know a lot more about vaginas than you do, and in that case, your attempted insult is bogus.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/26 06:02 PM
1

They are in conflict, and your later agreement showed that. You agreed that sex with the wrong kind of man can hurt/ruin the woman, but you strongly criticized when you claimed I said that the act of sex itself ruined women. So you can’t say they are the same. I never brag about my exes. I only mention the past when necessary due to it being relevant to the topic at hand. My wife knows she is my whole world, and she doesn’t have to worry about “pumping and dumping,” as she is different from the …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/26 06:00 PM
1

I see you’re just making up nonsense now. Like you said, when you don’t have an argument you resort to this. You tell on yourself a lot. I have not changed what I said Yeah, you did. At first you were saying that I believe sex ruins women and that my wife was ruined. I contradicted that by specifying I believe that decisions ruin women, not sex itself, then you agreed with me. So yes, you changed it. (Not to mention you avoided the question of how my wife is supposedly ruined in the previous com…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/26 06:45 PM
1

Exactly: bad decisions like … Lol so you’re already admitting you were wrong. Well that was fast! Accused me of something, then when I show you wrong, you agree with me. Why, because I’m not a slut? Bc you mentioned sex is just another way to hurt women 🤮 I couldn’t care less if you’re a slut and haven’t mentioned it. It’s not my concern lol When you don’t have an argument, you just resort to insults and shaming words. Oh, THAT’S why you took back your accusation and agreed with me then called m…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/26 04:35 PM
1

It’s why I wanted a virgin for marriage and long term but was okay with non-virgins when I wasn’t looking to marry.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/26 04:19 AM
1

You strike me as the kind of person who mindlessly swapped words with synonyms in your high school essays and thought the results were amazing. Lol… Good things you’re wrong. Some cope that is. These aren’t listed as synonyms; they’re listed as definitions, which means they’re usually interchangeable and not nuanced in doing so. There’s literally a link above these definitions that says “Synonyms for the word where you click to see the listed synonyms. “ LOL! So you don’t know the difference bet…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/26 03:49 AM
0

that you've convinced them to eat bacon, which likens them to the virgin who had decided to have sex. No, I disagree. You should have said someone who isn't vegan but only likes steak from one particular steakhouse. Then one would be apt to want to try that steakhouse, right? But if you know a meat lover guy who likes steak from literally anywhere he can get it, he's not so believable when he brags on a steakhouse. See the difference? because you think being discriminating and being discerning a…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/26 02:41 AM
1

Druggies don't care as much about quality as they do about just getting high, hence they buy more low-quality drugs when necessary to get the same effect. I agree that they are more likely to know what the drug contains beforehand, but that does not contribute to this argument. The only way it would is actually to help on my side: it would be equivalent to the virgin being more discriminate/selective bc she's more cautious and less prone to take the risks. Harvard is SELECTIVE. Non-virgin women …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/26 02:05 AM
1

All opinions might as well be. Glad you see it that way too now.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/26 01:23 AM
1

He needs to value her as a person as well. Hopefully he finds value in wisdom and good judgment. Doing otherwise is still gross no matter how you try to spin it. Opinions are useless. Some say they're like buttholes... lol
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/26 01:15 AM
1

She doesn't lose value to ME. She loses SMV to men who might be interested in choosing her as a partner. Which is why I would want to teach her better values so that she can get what she wants and be happy later.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/26 12:35 AM
1

If you enjoy something or have a provocation that leads you to enjoy it, like an insecurity and you get assurance by having sex, even though it's temporary, etc., then of course you keep doing it, especially in times where you need it more, like hoe phases. The same is true of drugs or practically anything. As a matter of fact, just for fun, let's use that example in addition to the college one. Drug example: A person who gets easily addicted to almost any drug doesn't care so much about which d…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/26 12:32 AM
1

>I'm referring to men who are low competence when it comes to actually pleasuring women sexually Then your argument is pointless. Everybody knows a man who has had more flings will be more apt to please a woman, and it's these very men who do not settle for women who have "been around/too casual." >but you're moving the goal posts Not really. But if mentioning what research says provokes you to that, there's already a completely separate issue here, don't you think? >My arguments centered around…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/26 12:08 AM
1

but then also lose value to you if they have sexual experience Not if it's with the person she marries, has kids with, etc. In which case she isn't complaining, she's happy, and so on. So it's all about the choices (wisdom), not about the act of having sex. So again you daughter will lave less value to you if she has sexual relationships that don't end in marriage. No bc I wouldn't be looking at my daughter as a future partner. (Gross btw) I have no reason to be looking at her SMV. The point in …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/26 12:00 AM
1

How would my wife be ruined? She waited until she found the person she married and now has a family with. She’s as smart as they come lol I don’t think sex itself ruins women. That’s ridiculous. I think bad decisions ruin women. (Example: They fuck a guy thinking he will stay, but he’s just pumping and dumping, so she gets upset and goes hoe phase) sex is just a way to enjoy hurting a woman Please see a therapist. You sound scary. You set a terrible example: of a man who thinks women are ruined …
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/25 09:44 PM
2

Actually, I mentioned being a resident in one comment, and it was in explanation that contradicted the other user’s argument, thus showing how he/she was wrong. Bragging would be if I had brought it up. I didn’t; they did. Which really, if anything, just shows that my profile gets stalked lol You, on the other hand, literally started with the credentials. Yes, that’s bragging and has nothing to do with your gender. A man who had said the same thing would’ve been laughed at the exact same way. An…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/25 09:32 PM
1

I think people know the answers to this and just don’t like it. I’ll explain anyway. The standards and expectations are different for men and women. Women tend to be attracted to men who are well-desired by other women and have taken those opportunities. Men are more attracted to women who are modest and more selective, thus not having taken the opportunities. The reason for the difference comes in nature: women are naturally desired automatically by default, whereas men are desired if they are …
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/25 09:25 PM
1

Any reference or proof? Not unless you can prove it… lol Just saying something doesn’t make it true. No matter how much you’d love for it to be so you could validly call me a hypocrite lol
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/25 09:09 PM
1

If the expectations are not the same on both sides, it’s not hypocrisy.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/25 08:38 PM
1

You can’t appeal to statistics rigor while simultaneously denying objectivity because you’re undermining your own argument. False. There’s value in subjectivity. Through subjective observations and stats we get advances in medicine, sports, consumerism, and pretty much everything else. That’s why research is so valuable. When challenged But you haven’t challenged it. You still haven’t told me what an objective measure of quality would be. You just accuse me of stuff but then can’t back it up whe…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/25 08:36 PM
1

Possible but rare. And much less so than a virgin would have. (Given she’s a virgin by choice and not ugly or somehow just undesired) If she’s not a virgin when she meets the man she will have kids with, she’s obviously not wise/discerning. So could she? Maybe if she’s learned from it the hard way. So still not a good role model.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/25 08:06 PM
1

I enjoyed sex with my bf since the first time we slept together. So did my wife and I. What’s your point? Do you feel sad you haven’t lost yours to her? I try not to think about it. But sometimes I wish I had been wiser. You know you’re describing yourself, right? I’ve already said that I’m an outlier. So yes but no. I was lucky enough not to have bonding issues, etc. Do you feel bad about the fact that you’re a worse partner now? I’m not. Statistically I should be. Like I said, I got lucky. No,…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/25 08:01 PM
1

”As the number of samples increases, the sample mean converges to the expected value of the underlying distribution. That’s exactly what I said. Lol No, you’re just not understanding what you just read. Let me make it clearer. https://www.probabilitycourse.com/chapter7/7_1_1_law_of_large_numbers.php https://www.datacamp.com/tutorial/law-of-large-numbers As you can see, the “expected” result is the “intrinsic” or least subjective value. Hopefully you can understand it now. In dating, no such obje…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/25 07:51 PM
1

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/2018/11/13/children-take-mothers-romantic-habits-study-finds/ It means children tend to look up to their parents and that I want my daughter to be modest, secure, honest/loyal, and wise and discerning in her decisions. A woman who already is that is a great example, making my daughter more likely to be that way.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/25 07:01 PM
1

No? Generalities are the goal. Which is why I said the anecdotes were pointless. Your wife is not the only virgin woman on the planet. Who said she was? And you know generalities are measured by stats, right? Take a group of people with a certain trait and measure other qualities you’re interested in. Find a correlation. Sex feels better when you’re not a virgin. That’s kinda the point of me taking her virginity. You can lose it to the person you marry and have a family with and be happy, if not…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/25 06:54 PM
2

Even if many selective people make the same choice, that only reflects their individual criteria, This is where stats comes in with the Law of Large Numbers. By taking many “samples” from huge groups you can judge the entire piece. The Law of Large Numbers describes averages, it doesn’t assign any intrinsic value False. The LoLN says that if you take a large number of samples for something and average them all together that the result is closer to the actual “intrinsic” value with the more sampl…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/25 06:39 PM
2

It does. If one is selective but secure, then the options that are selected are of higher value to that individual. If this happens in large quantities, with most selective individuals choosing the same options, it means even more. Look up the Law of Large Numbers. (This is even seen with hypergamy and high-value men.) And yes, I corrected your argument rather than engage with it as it was, since it was wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/25 05:17 PM
1

Am I supposed to care if you read it? Guess I missed the Reddit meeting where everyone has to care about who reads or likes their posts now. Maybe I’ll catch it next time!
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/25 05:13 PM
2

This. ^ Lol bro you burned her. Hope she remembers derm well hahaha
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/25 05:11 PM
2

Yeah, I would definitely prefer that my daughter has a mom who is more secure in herself than one who goes to med or grad school and sleeps around. (I’m an MD-PhD too so if you’re not lying then congrats.) My wife is a nurse, but she is a lot more secure in herself and values herself a lot better, hence she doesn’t need to brag about it on Reddit lol So yes, I prefer her over someone like you for my daughter any day. Education is great, but values are better. There are many people a lot more suc…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/25 05:07 PM
1

Who said her entire worth is determined by sexual experience? I love when I or another user makes a point so clear and concise that people can’t even argue it so they just try to put words in the OP’s mouth
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/25 05:05 PM
1

Lol real 💯 Happy New Year , man
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/25 05:03 PM
1

Yeah, I think they should have. And they had no way of knowing I’d leave. (I wasn’t even planning to leave at the time. It happened later.) So it really just shows hypergamy in action, not a surprise to anyone.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/25 05:02 PM
2

You put a lot of words in my mouth and just gave a factless baseless opinion lmaooooo 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/25 04:56 PM
2

^ “I can’t prove OP wrong or dispute him so I’m just gonna make up some crazy assertion and put words in his mouth.”
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/25 04:54 PM
1

“OP, you’ve been very successful at nailing women and know the game.” Thank you :)
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/25 04:53 PM
2

They’re not selective bc of inexperience. They’re selective due to higher standards and lack of insecurity. So Idk where you got that or if you just made it up.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/25 04:53 PM
1

That’s what statistics is, is it not? Take a large sample and draw a conclusion. Law of large numbers is in favor of you have them. Anecdotes are not evidence, so I didn’t bother to read your story. You mean the sluts were insecure? Actually, I agree with that. That’s not a contradiction. Maybe I should have been more elaborate about the virgins being more secure. I shut down a whole thing before it could even get started. An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure. :) Given what you said g…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/25 04:51 PM
1

They sure bled, were extremely tight, and a lot more modest for non-virgins then. I’m glad you would know how they were or weren’t? Lol (Say you’re an idiot without saying you’re an idiot…)
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/25 04:42 PM
1

Men who get lots of women are low competence? You make no sense lol Given that being more open to premarital and random sex with multiple partners is - even shown in research - being more likely to cheat, more insecure, like in hoe phases, etc. , so making one less selective. And the dictionary even says it too. If your opinion differs with the research, the facts, and the dictionary, cool, that’s on you. I’ll stick with the facts, like that promiscuous women like you’re describing can’t bond an…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/25 04:40 PM
1

True, but I agree with the subjective definition. Really anything and everything is subjective to an extent. You know what the biggest sign of insecurity is? A woman who has too many casual partners bc she can’t bond and needs assurance. (I would consider your point or at least look it up if my wife was insecure, but she’s not, so I’m not worried about it.) Yeah, my wife enjoys it a lot more now than she did at first. We have a good fulfilling sex life. Idk what these anecdotes have to do with t…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/25 04:34 PM
1

Someone who can’t read or is strawmanning ^
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/25 04:27 PM
1

Nope. Most girls who run into that problem didn’t have a caring and protective father their whole lives growing up, which contributes to insecurity, attachment issues, and “daddy issues.” I would stay by my daughter and instill the values she needs into her.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/25 04:25 PM
1

I actually don’t have a bonding issue. I got lucky, I guess. The standard is different for men. I set a good example for my son. I wouldn’t want my son to be undesired by women, and if he was a virgin at my age, I would be very concerned. So no, your “point” isn’t valid here. Yet they orgasmed with me and it was fabulous… You’re ridiculous. If my wife shared that opinion, I would consider it. But she doesn’t. So… as they say… “opinions are like buttholes…” lol
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/25 04:24 PM
2

And yet want to call US the hypocrites and can’t even back it up… 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/25 04:20 PM
1

I wouldn’t recommend it to them but I’m not gonna force them to be with someone they don’t love or to not be with someone they do love.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/25 05:39 AM
-1

If you’re 16-20, this is a normal opinion. If you’re not, it’s a dumb one. Says who? Just you? Well, opinions are like buttholes… the idea that being a good mother has anything to do with how much sexual experience she had before you makes no sense. Lol. I want my daughter to grow up and value herself independently, NOT be a slut. She needs a mother who sets that kind of example. If you want a kid to grow up to be a great basketball player, would it make a difference if his dad is a disabled obe…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/25 05:37 AM
2

And my argument is based on the fact that virgins are more discriminate and selective, making obtaining them more competitive. So the competition is in getting it, not keeping it. With non-virgins, like you said, the competition is moreso in keeping it. This might explain why average guys have such a hard time (they usually don’t have access to virgins) and HVM don’t have that problem. Bc a HVM is more likely not to want to “keep” the experienced woman anyway. But if you please an experienced wo…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/25 05:31 AM
1

How could I be insecure about a non-virgin's ability when I've already experienced them? There's no reason to assume a woman who has had a few relationships will be setting some slut-forward standard. I disagree. And I would never defend Epstein. You're getting really defensive and far off... lol That's possible but crazy. And it doesn't really contradict my post. Have you never seen the comments women like to resort to in this discussion? "He likes virgins so he must be small!" There are always…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/25 04:57 AM
1

They shouldn't need a relationship to be happy. I was happy before I ever knew my wife. Hell, I was happy right after some break ups in high school and college. I wouldn't teach my son to place his value on whether he is in a relationship. But nobody should spend the rest of their lives with something they don't want, so the point for him would be to think about whether the woman is worth it to him or not. And I can teach him values fs but at the end of the day he is a different person.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/25 04:45 AM
1

You poor thing. You get offended so easily.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/25 04:40 AM
3

That's what the wedding ring was for, and all the ways I show her I love her. She knows she's my world. Edit: If your comment was to make me feel bad, you won't succeed at that. I know I'm lucky to have her, but I'm not insecure by any means. We have a great meaningful sex life.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/25 04:36 AM
1

I never heard it said, " Nobody is the villain in their own story." But it makes 100% sense and yes you're right. I guess I was just shocked at how many on Reddit are on the reframing end of this? Lol
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/25 04:34 AM
-1

>Why didn't you marry said virgin since you took the effort to deflower her and make her unmarriageable by your logic? A woman user pointed this out a little while ago. It's a fair point. Gave me something to think about. >Also, why are you sleeping around when it harms your ability to pair bond? I think it was on another post that a guy pointed that one out. Still a logical and fair point. Tbh my response is "because I could," as I tend to be well-liked. But from a moral or philosophical standp…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/25 04:32 AM
1

I'm married, so it's not really my concern anymore. If that becomes an issue it will affect future men. But I get the point you're making. Yes, virgins are already rare.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/25 04:20 AM
1

As HVM we can do that. And you're gonna hate this but the only reason we can do that is hypergamy. Lol Women are hypergamous; men are not. The top HVM being so in demand is what enables us to do this.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/25 04:07 AM
1

First woman so far to make a good case here. Given I didn’t stay with them, I can only hope they found someone they match better with. I wouldn’t want to be their future partners, though… By your logic, if you had integrity, you shouldn’t sleep with a virgin you don’t intend to marry because you’re just “tarnishing” them, no? Ngl, this makes sense. So it’s fair to say I did not have much integrity. Bc there were some whom I was casual with and some where we had serious intentions, but I think al…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/25 03:53 AM
1

I just explained it. Now you’re trying to make me repeat it all over again. Loser behavior.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/25 03:39 AM
1

Your coping is serious. Lmao I never mentioned wanting or needing a dick. So are you illiterate as well, or just offended?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/25 03:38 AM
3

I never said that. Literally your whole entire thing now is just either trying to insult me or put words in my mouth. That’s coping at its finest.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/25 03:36 AM
1

Hahaha, still coping! Trying to insult when can’t combat… I love it.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/25 03:34 AM
1

Where? I never said men are hypocrites at all. The only time I ever said someone was a hypocrite was when I said by your logic everyone is. “I’m not going to because… I can’t.” 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/25 03:33 AM
3

The fact that you couldn’t combat me but have to get verification from another user And I already explained the difference: I have a perspective that’s backed by other statements. You only gave a simple opinion as a way to say, “I hate what you’ve said but can’t combat it so I’ll just attempt to throw a meaningless insult!”
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/25 03:31 AM
2

If you’re heterosexual, you expect your partner to clean his dick, right? Do you clean your dick? Are you good at producing sperm in your own body? Do you expect your partner to produce his own sperm? It’s not rocket science. By your flawed logic everyone would be a hypocrite simply bc we all expect something different in a partner (exception: gays/lesbians) and that’s the benefit of mating. If we were meant to expect the same thing from everyone we wouldn’t be a sexually reproducing species.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/25 03:27 AM
1

Actually, you said it’s “fucking stupid” (your words) that I said by your logic everyone is a hypocrite. Which is true. And you didn’t even try to prove otherwise or offer any logic yourself; all you did was try to insult me. That’s EXACTLY what losers do when they have nothing to prove.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/25 03:25 AM
3

Makes no sense. Just like all your other comments.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/25 03:21 AM
1

Considering I’m a resident at the hospital and the patients on my unit are sleeping rn (It’s 10:18 p.m. rn), yeah it’s not a bad way to spend it. If I didn’t have to work this 24 hrs I would be at home with my wife and kid or take them to be with one of our fams for the holidays. (We go to Cali to be with her folks in a few days. And yes, epically failing to insult a guy who works as a medical resident by assuming you know anything about his life does show your low value.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/25 03:20 AM
1

The difference: I argued a perspective, which is backed up / supported by other ideas or verifiable statements. Yours is just a way of saying, “I’m mad at you and don’t know what to say so I’m gonna try to throw a meaningless insult!” Lol
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/25 03:17 AM
2

Love to see the coping here! Keep it up
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/25 03:15 AM
2

Love to see the coping here!
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/25 03:15 AM
2

If she says she wants a man who hunts, yes that’s a standard. How am I a hypocrite? Are you heterosexual? If so, you’re demanding something from a partner that you don’t have.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/25 03:13 AM
-5

It’s just comedy at this point. Yeah, I was laughing at you already. Good thing you’ve caught on. Same with your four teeth thing 😂 Thanks for giving me a laugh tonight bc I needed it. Haha
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/25 03:12 AM
-10

No, he’s a celebrity, so the media literally pays him to act a certain way, do certain things to the public, etc. Same with Trump, like you said. Travis Kelcie and TS. Pretty much any other celebrity. And to name some - mainly me and my friend Grant. But that’s anecdotal. I don’t take anecdotes and you shouldn’t either. People can just pull shit out their asses and make stuff up. But celebrities definitely can’t be used as a counter bc they’re literally paid for the media they present. This woul…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/25 02:52 AM
2

Looking in a mirror there? I don’t argue over opinions. Get a life.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/25 02:51 AM
0

Yes. Just like women have standards for men that they don’t meet (like my example of having a dick). My wife has standards for me that she doesn’t meet (e.g., she likes that I’m a hunter but she has no interest in hunting). This is a universal thing, and it’s actually a good thing bc it causes us to appreciate differences. If you think that’s hypocritical, then to you everyone is a hypocrite- yourself included.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/25 02:50 AM
1

Opinions are like buttholes… Take care and happy holidays lol
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/25 02:46 AM
-5

Most HVM actually still prefer virgins for marriage or long-term commitment. If they’re just being casual and not wanting commitment then an experienced woman can do the trick bc they’re less likely to catch feelings.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/25 02:45 AM
0

Then by your logic everyone is a hypocrite. Bc we all want something we aren’t expected to have ourselves; that’s the whole point of mating.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/25 02:42 AM
1

Yes. I’ll never be his mom. So no, my logic wasn’t flawed. Lol A good role model for a dad has had more partners in the past. “But that’s a double standard!” Right! Just like a woman might want her hubby to have a big dick. NO man wants his wife to have a big dick. Expectations are different for groups. Welcome to life!
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/25 02:38 AM
-3

No brothers. He has a good role model though… me! 😄
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/25 02:26 AM
0

As a research scientist in neurobiology, I can’t disagree with your first part more. There are loads of research (in the biological sciences, not just social science, bleh lol) and entire textbooks, courses, and just well-known facts that prove the opposite of that. Yeah, I guess values could be a thing. I didn’t factor that one in.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/25 02:23 AM
0

Yeah, when they can’t get something themselves it’s so much easier to just say those who can preferring it is “insecure.”
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/25 02:17 AM
-3

It wasn’t to brag. I’m married. The background was to explain how I’m not insecure, since that’s where most users like to go with this topic. It’s not hypocritical if the desired standards/expectations aren’t the same. If my wife wanted a virgin man then yeah I would be a big hypocrite. Most women don’t want virgin men. And according to the studies, yeah it would. That one could be addressed to my wife, as I’m not a woman and I don’t understand the reasons why she wasn’t more skeptical. Maybe bc…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/25 02:11 AM
2

It was also on the PROBABILITY of getting the sex. The quality is irrelevant if you’re not even getting it. To quote you: Basically, a less desirable man, which many Reddit men are, is more likely to get decent sex from an inexperienced woman than an experienced woman. There’s a combination of probability and quality in that, and the probability must precede the quality, as I stated above. Your “explanation” after that is just a cop out. Truthfully, women who are better able to pair bond and pro…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/25 01:15 AM
5

Y’all do. Hypergamy even helps support the concept. Women want a man desired by many women and who can dominate them all. Men want a woman who has her choices but is only submissive to him. Denying reality or being delusional isn’t gonna get you anywhere here. Go argue with somebody that you think 1+1 is 9 or something.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/25 12:26 AM
-3

Yeah y’all do. Getting offended by “utter shit” doesn’t make it untrue. Lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/25 12:23 AM
3

They could but they don’t. Most women want the opposite: a man who has fucked other women. But yes, theoretically, if men and women didn’t desire different qualities, yeah they could.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/25 12:21 AM
2

Makes no sense. The opposite is true: women with more experience tend to give sex easier bc they’re less selective. So a LVM gets it from experienced women more and probably doesn’t even have access to virgins.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/25 12:11 AM
4

Except for HVM who have successfully fucked both virgins and non-virgins and prefer a virgin lol You’re talking about LVM. They don’t usually have much choice anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/25 12:09 AM
-4

That’s the gist of it. Except nothing beats breaking one in, even when you’re being casual.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/25 12:07 AM
1

I share this view 100%. I was popular so definitely had the opportunities to be sexual with non-virgins, but even then I set the standard that I would only marry a virgin. And to add to the reasons you described: they’re not as easy, but if they love you they love you harder and more openly bc they haven’t been broken in the past. The sex has more meaning bc it’s not something she just uses as a coping skill (hoe phases); she actually wants you bc she loves you and desires you, and you’re the on…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/25 12:04 AM
1

Counterpoint to that: Most men who insist on marrying a virgin have had sex with non-virgins and still prefer the scenario he described. (The virgin is the best flavor, by your analogy.)
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/25 12:00 AM
1

One can’t be a hypocrite if the standards/expectations are not the same. Women don’t usually want virgin men. Do you expect the same from your partner as you give yourself? No, you don’t. No one heterosexual does. Lol I’ll happily run her through ‘til the day we die. I’m dedicated to her and she’s dedicated to me. As a matter of fact, she’s so loyal and wise that if I showed her this thread she’d probably laugh at your comments. Lol I love her
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/25 09:30 PM
0

Yes, I know it correlates with her being a virgin. That was a standard I had for a wife someday: I wouldn’t marry a non-virgin. I don’t like promiscuity and don’t want it in the mother of and example for my future daughter. I had high expectations: a woman who respects herself, isn’t insecure, and only wants sex with the person she loves and plans to stay with, wants sex with me bc she’s crazy about me, not bc she just wants validation from a person with a dick. I’m glad I kept my high standard.…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/25 09:20 PM
-2

It’s funny that you make it sound like a crazy fantasy or something but yet it really happens. I married a woman who was a virgin before me. Get best sex ever multiples times a day!
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/25 07:53 PM
2

Lmao. So you’re both miserable and into having sex with dogs… Disgusting 🤮 And nah, multiple users here have called you out as a troll. You’re the one with the problems, not us. And it shows. I don’t think any of these guys would blame men for not committing to you. I sure don’t.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/25 08:17 PM
4

It’s really funny that the very things they sought to abolish are the things they still want and crave, isn’t it? Feminism = Foolishism is my new line for this lol
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/25 04:34 PM
6

Posts like this are funny because women cannot help but sabotage themselves. Okay, glad I’m not the only one laughing at all this. I’ve been laughing - almost crying from it - for twenty minutes. I’m even screenshotting all this and gonna post elsewhere.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/25 04:24 PM
3

This. They’re already screwed. (Literally) 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/25 04:17 PM
2

I’m guessing she used to live in hell, and there’s a lot of women down there. That’s why the women here look like angels to her. (It’s a joke lmao) But yes, she’s delusional. There are very few women anymore who actually are similar to angels. Most women, on the other hand, have the same problems she’s having. And if that’s angelic then I don’t even wanna go to heaven lol
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/25 04:11 PM
7

Truth in a nutshell ^ ☝🏻
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/25 04:04 PM
4

I love how you’re pointing out WOMEN’S flaw here (having bad judgment) yet want to continue to blame men. we have to demand these things when women shouldn’t even have to be asking in first place That’s some extreme self-entitlement! Good thing you’re waking up to reality. Was this meant to be funny? You call men broken pieces of sht but you complain about how you fck with them and they’re smart enough not to commit. I mean… 😅You’ve given me the laugh for the day.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/25 03:50 PM
4

And they’re surprised that when they so easily give themselves away to these men they still don’t commit to them. It’s so laughable.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/25 03:08 PM
4

You’re just now figuring this out? You’re telling women to change and do the right thing, yet at the end you make it sound like men are the ones who’ve been in the wrong. “… just for men to do the right thing.” Lol Summary: Why buy the cow when the milk is free? Yes, if access to the milk (sex) is restricted, men will want to buy the cow (marry the woman, be committed to her, etc.). If access is free to everyone, why worry about committing? Despite what people claim on Reddit, in the real world …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/25 03:04 PM
1

Dictionaries post the most commonly used or the most convenient definitions given by people. That’s why they have to be updated. Language is subjective. People use dictionaries to try to prevent ambiguity. If that wasn’t the case, what purpose would they serve at all? He didn’t specify that it hasn’t been defined by a certain person or group. He just said it hasn’t been defined. I showed that it has. You’re putting words in his mouth. If the people debating it don’t use the definition and want t…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/25 04:12 AM
1

You can’t track what doesn’t already exist. So the meaning had to exist in order to be put in the dictionary. Define means “give meaning to.” According to you or the dictionary? If you, then your argument is subjective and you’re wasting time. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/define The dictionary actually says it can be either: to define could be to “determine or identify” or “to discover and set forth” the meaning of. Argue with the dictionary.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/25 02:42 AM
2

Until you can actually post something to back yourself up, adios. You made the first argument and haven’t given any evidence this entire time. Lmao I’m just gonna block you atp bc you love to come back but NEVER have any evidence to support yourself. Get a life.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/25 09:16 PM
2

The one you kept claiming “correlation vs. causation” on, as if that would make you correct. Still no links or studies for your claims, huh… look I can do this all day That’s sad. Say you don’t have a life without saying you don’t have a life. At this point you’ve told on yourself and shown yourself a fool and you weren’t even trying to lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/25 08:53 PM
2

The one who started the argument dismisses the evidence given to her and can’t provide any for herself. Thank you for proving my point.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/25 06:13 PM
–

Just as you did! 😂 Yes, you gave a whole lot of text with ZERO links. See how stupid it makes you look? It’s even worse when there’s a whole internet out there for reading that supports their side but not yours at all! :) And you mean minus the one they gave you that you didn’t like? 🤔
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/25 05:49 PM
–

They pointed you to one. There’s proof, you just don’t like it. I think you’re the one in fantasy. It’s kind of obvious lol There is a lot on this in social science research, especially with topics like 1. hoe phases (women handling some kind of insecurity by being promiscuous for a certain time). 2. the fact that majority of men still prefer virgins. 3. the study on promiscuity and lack of loyalty, which you like to say is due to promiscuous people being “born as cheaters” (lol) while you can’t…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/25 04:27 PM
–

Male sluts commit to women with less N though, or even virgins, simply because the man is desirable so he has good pick of the crop. HVM usually don’t commit to sluts at all; we just use them for fuckbuddies until we find a wife later. Which 1. Stabs women’s beloved claim that it’s due to men’s insecurity in the neck 2. Is, as other users have mentioned, pretty well supported by psychological research, since female sluts tend to have problems
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/25 03:42 PM
–

Yeah, those aren’t abusive. And like you said, they do reward those. If they really wanted to stop it they would stop making stupid decisions and rewarding it. Seems I just got the wrong idea at first when you said abusive.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/25 01:58 AM
–

Yeah, I agree. When you said “abusive” I was thinking rape, serious behaviors, etc. Stuff you’d go to prison or see a psychologist for. The stuff you’re calling abusive here I don’t agree is abusive, and partly because like you said, women actually like it and reward it - even though their own actions to it disadvantage them. They bring about their own problem in that.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/25 01:20 AM
–

Wish I could put this on the front of a newspaper. You’ve pointed out a serious flaw with the incel men here: they think bad of their competition due to insecurity. Not that the competition is actually bad, just that they’re not man enough to compete and can’t stand it so they have to make an excuse.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/25 10:40 PM
–

True. The difference is that saying no isn’t wrong, but being abusive is.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/25 10:38 PM
–

These behaviors are never justified, but not just for men - for women, too. Your post should be to everyone and have no gender bias bc both are guilty and like to blame everyone else for their own problems. “…struggling with very real constraints like shared custody and financial dependency, physical abuse and controlling dynamics.” Don’t forget that women put themselves in that position like 99% of the time. (The only exception is by rape, so I’ll leave off 1%.)
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/25 10:36 PM
13

Yeah. Then they complain that they have a sexless marriage or the woman wants a divorce (>70% of the time) or when people look down on them bc their wife is a hoe. Perfect example of how people bring problems on themselves but love to complain Imagine being desperate enough to marry someone you don’t even like and then not even getting what you want out of it as she leaves with half your stuff. Lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/25 07:16 PM
1

I agree with that. ALL sides should require proof, but our system has gone from “innocent until proven guilty” to “let’s just assume the more favorable scenario.” And I already answered that. He could have some kind of anxiety or social problem the girl doesn’t have.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/25 07:02 PM
1

I addressed it. The fact that they “live in a society that is entirely built, maintained, progressed, and defended by men… enjoying all of the modern day comforts…” (your words), against the will of men even (as you acknowledged, “at the expense of men”), shows their control. You can try to dismiss this by saying it’s in men in the government, as you did, but there are a lot of women in the government making very powerful decisions, and it wasn’t always like this: once upon a time women had zero…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/25 06:53 PM
1

Eh, I don’t think our philosophical perspectives on this are reconcilable. Seems like we both acknowledge history and how it went down but we interpret it differently. For example, I don’t see how you see freedom and security as the same. They literally cannot even coexist. The more security you implement in a society, the less free it is. And Vice versa: you can’t have complete freedom with security in place and lines drawn. Not saying your interpretation is wrong. Just saying I don’t share the…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/25 03:26 AM
4

Did you not read the OP? Referring to history when men ran the system, raped women when they wanted to, etc. … And your question is exactly what I pointed out to you. Somehow men have lost the power, and women didn’t have to shoot or nuke them to obtain it. Hmmmm… “Women aren’t dominating anything. Just the thought alone is laughable.” But you just admitted that men have lost control and women are taking advantage of their work. Lol I’m a man. Lol But I disagree that freedom for anyone - men or …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/25 09:28 PM
2

As a man, I think women would survive alone better than men would. Women would probably band together and help each other. Men fight and kill each other (of their own species), wars, etc. Without women the men would probably kill each other/themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/25 08:58 PM
1

Agree 100% and wish people weren’t too dumb to see this Tbh I think they just have a fear of losing ability to reward and punish by society.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/25 08:53 PM
8

“They just live in a system that is rigged in their favor at the expense of men…” Given that system started out controlled by men at the expense of women, apparently the women have outcompeted the men. Or what do you say, that the men just gave it to them and now complain about it? Lol And the women didn’t even have to fight the men for the control to change hands.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/25 08:50 PM
8

“2. Men are more violent, yes” If a woman had said that on this sub, you’d be going haywire. “That’s misandrist!” I’m tempted to publish this in a newspaper or something. Funny how y’all can’t stand for women to say it but you’ll openly admit it in another thread. I hope the women see this.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/25 08:44 PM
2

This. Men have talked about decentering women and shit like MGTOW and all that for decades and still can’t pull it off.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/25 08:35 PM
2

Doubt it. HVM won’t stop approaching women. Only the suckers will. And women don’t care about those.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/25 08:30 PM
1

Yeah. I’m curious whether he was just ignoring reality out of stubbornness to try to keep his side or he really thought our social behaviors are not in our genes at all…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/25 08:28 PM
4

“… not written down in genes.” LOL bro needs to finish elementary school.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/25 08:26 PM
2

HVM/Chads won’t stop pursuing real women and will continue to be desired by them, making these complainers who get AI gfs just a laughing stock. Imagine being in high school a few generations from now: someone’s dad having an AI gf would make that kid a bully target. I mean, that’s showing everyone that you’re low-value. Decentering women would be a positive step. HVM know this; they don’t center their lives around women. Y’all are just really late in getting started on this.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/25 07:02 PM
3

Can you prove that he was treated worse just for being a boy? Not saying it’s impossible, but you can’t just assume something without knowing more information about the other variables. That’s with anything. Actually, I don’t side with the women on here at all. So much of their shit they bring on themselves but don’t want to be held accountable. But I DO side with the facts and a logical approach.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/25 01:37 AM
5

Looks and same family in childhood (a few environmental factors) aren’t the only factors that contribute to how a person is treated. It can have a lot to do with it. He may have a mental/social disorder like ASD that she doesn’t have. And no, I didn’t say anything about hating the guy. I’m just pointing out that you made some assumptions without controlling for other possible variables. You gotta love how someone who makes a post with so many wrong assumptions and flaws in basic biology would tr…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/25 01:03 AM
–

I wouldn’t. And actually I would think more highly of her if she dumped me (or whoever lied to her) and moved on. Shows her self-respect.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/25 09:46 PM
6

Honesty is honesty. The topic about which someone is lying doesn’t make a difference; they’re still not honest.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/25 09:13 PM
9

Your assertions that they are so similar due to them being twins is retarded. They’re fraternal twins, so 2 different eggs and 2 different sperm. It’s no different than if the same mom and dad had had them a year apart. Same parents does not by any means mean same genetics. Also, if he’s not social and doesn’t talk to women then what does he expect?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/25 09:09 PM
9

They want honesty from women in these things? I see them on here saying that they willingly lie to women all the time to get sex, and they condone this lying and try to justify it. What hypocrisy. Okay, glad I’m not red pill. I’ve learned something new today.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/25 09:02 PM
–

Both are at fault. There are literally tests for STDs. You go in the hospital and they take like 5 minutes once the sample goes to the lab. A person can also be more responsible and decrease the chance of getting it by using a condom or knowing their partner better. And I agree with that. In your example both people made shitty decisions. Same as in the OP. My only addition would be don’t complain about the consequences you bring on yourself by making stupid decisions, and you’re not entitled to…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/25 08:15 PM
–

And in reality, both genders lie and are dishonest to an extent, and such conditions without a written contract and proof of breach don’t hold up by law, so they can complain all they want but the only thing that would change it in their favor is for them to make better decisions. Yep, that’s the reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/25 08:01 PM
5

It’s amazing how many will ask the fish how to catch one instead of asking the pro fisherman…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/25 06:20 PM
1

Yep. Pill checks out.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/25 06:19 PM
1

Thanks to my independent happiness of life and not needing verification of women, I have a lot of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/25 08:06 PM
2

I’ve been going to the gym since I was 13, whether I had a gf or not. And I make six figs a year, again independent of what women think or say I like my job. And I’m usually rated a 9, on average. Could do the same as a 2. So go figure. I think you just don’t want to accept that confidence is independent of what others think bc you can’t imagine being happy without needing approval of women.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/25 06:48 PM
1

This is true and a great way to distinguish confidence and arrogance.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/25 06:44 PM
1

As I said, the men are pathetic. I’m a man and I like sex, but I’ve never been desperate enough to simp for average women on a dating app. Tbh, I’m starting to think it’s not what we do that makes us HVM look good; it’s how lame the average dudes are that makes us look good.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/25 03:21 PM
2

The average woman doesn’t need the average man. Step outside. Average women don’t want to marry an average man. They either want a HVM (as you say, 0.01) or no marriage at all. That’s where your post is flawed.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/25 03:05 PM
1

If they’re getting >30 potential suitors a day compared to the men not getting even a third of that, either they are bombshells or the men are pathetic. Or both lol
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/25 03:01 PM
0

That’s probably why they get ghosted and run into the problems OP mentioned.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/25 02:59 PM
3

That’s ridiculous. I work with women who have only focused on their careers, are still in their late 20s or early 30s, and make almost half a million a year, so more than most guys do. And they have no intention of getting married. Nothing is stopping women from having the careers they want. And they’re not pushing to get married like you’re claiming, at least not in the U.S. The only luxury men have that women don’t have is we are seen as better when we have more sexual partners and having a di…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/25 02:55 PM
2

Yeah because I’d find ways to be happy and I’d be productive, like go to gym and make good money, which would raise it. My happiness and enjoyment of life is not dependent on anything other people think.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/25 02:20 PM
1

“… somehow garnered the confidence to behave as though he is more desirable than he actually is.” There’s the problem. That’s arrogance, not confidence. He’s insecurely using it to cover up a flaw. It’s not something he backs up. I was suggesting he should be confident about something he can actually be confident about (is backed up, shows in his life). That would be attractive to the women. And I disagree with your philosophy that others dictate our reality. Looks like a lot of you guys just wa…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 09:26 PM
1

But does he have reason to be confident about what he’s acting confident about? Everybody has something they can be confident about. If he has a reason to be confident about it then where’s the issue? And if you govern your behavior on opinions of people that you acknowledge aren’t even correct, then that’s a problem on its own. Just your problem, not theirs.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 08:28 PM
0

How long do those women stay with you? Not long at all. And who could blame them? Most guys - or people in general - can’t fake something for a long or significant amount of time. Tbh that’s not news to me. I’m almost 30 and had a great dating life before I got married. (I had my first real gf and sex when I was only 12. You do the math.) Faking won’t hold down what you want rn; you’ll just have something to complain about later. It’s more like “Fake it til you make it,” and when you make it (if…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 08:01 PM
2

That any confidence is attractive
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 04:37 PM
2

There are hot guys who still have problems getting women bc they’re insecure (usually has childhood problems). For example, a hot guy whose dad molested him a lot. And there are average guys who do better than other average guys just because they feel good about themselves and it’s obvious to people around them. I’m not saying that being hot isn’t the #1 factor. I’m saying that confidence is still attractive whether you’re hot or not.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 04:30 PM
2

Lol so you think trying to put on a show just in the moment is what women want? You think they don’t get to know who the guy is and the difference between who he is vs. what he’s doing just to try to impress her? Keep thinking that. No wonder you can’t get women.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 04:15 PM
1

Considering I have two doctorates in fields highly demanding of deductive logic and you didn’t even know the basics of the Munchausen Trilemma, yeah you’d have to present a lot more of a case and credentials for me to see an “issue” here. Being a mathematician doesn’t make you the smartest guy on the planet. (And it was Paul Erdos who said that, too, right?)
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 03:42 PM
1

I think you should read on the Munchausen Trilemma. Lol I never said my logic wasn’t flawed. I said all logic is flawed, as the Trilemma demonstrates, and that mine wasn’t circular as he was claiming. Yeah, maybe he will see your comments and learn from it.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 03:33 PM
1

Thank you for confirming my point. And the purpose of the Trilemma is to demonstrate that all logical methods are flawed and never lead to an objective truth. You know that if you’ve studied math.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 03:30 PM
0

If you’re saying all unattractive people have absolutely nothing to be confident in, I strongly disagree. They have something they can be confident in and it not be delusional. If not, they’re not even trying.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 03:19 PM
0

Not disagreeing that a lot of this is based on perception, but I won’t say all. What the person is confident or arrogant about needs to be backed up for it to be confidence. So, an unattractive person with an IQ of 168 can be confident in his academic abilities. That would be attractive in itself. No arrogance there. (Given he doesn’t go around flaunting it, I’m saying if he really is confident in it because he can be) If a physically unattractive obese 300 lb. person brags about how good-lookin…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 03:17 PM
2

Definitely. But just because you find yourself attractive doesn’t mean others will. There’s an extremely subjective component.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 03:10 PM
-4

Both are true: unattractiveness is itself unattractive, and insecurity is unattractive. So if you’re unattractive, why not at least give yourself something to be confident about to give yourself a few good points?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 03:06 PM
1

That’s not circular logic.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 02:59 PM
2

It is. Do you even know what logic is? You clearly didn’t read the links and don’t know basics of logic. If you could do that, you’d make millions. Present your breaking of the famous Trilemma to a philosophy professor. You’d get rich if you’re right. But you’re not.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 02:59 PM
2

1 Your grammar and sentence structure are horrible, so I don’t even understand your question. I’ve said everything very easily and simply. What part don’t you understand? Or is my genius too much for you? Just repeating something or not comprehending basics doesn’t look better than not using logic, jsyk. You’re a good example of the flaws OP is talking about.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 02:54 PM
2

Because for most people who have no options, a reason exists behind it. Examples: obesity, being short, lack of social skills, being poor/not able to financially support themselves, differences in moral values, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 02:39 PM
3

Actually, no it’s not. I’m not using premises as the conclusion or Vice versa; I’m saying your interpretation of the correlation between no options and inability to be a good partner is wrong. https://www.logicallyfallacious.com/logicalfallacies/Circular-Reasoning But thanks so much for the compliment! Circular logic is still logic, and ALL logic is flawed, as is shown in the Munchausen Trilemma. So whatever logic you’d prefer a person to use or you call yourself using would be just as flawed. h…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 02:30 PM
4

I agree with OP. There is PLENTY of flaw in the logic on this sub. Too much. And OP did a great job of pointing a small part of it out. And I disagree that intentions don’t matter. But that’s a separate topic.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 02:24 PM
2

I stopped you that fast? Lol I’m reversing your last implication to say that he probably has no options because of something he lacks, not the other way around, which is what you tried to imply.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 02:19 PM
-4

So what is Eugene confident in? What are some positives to how he spends his time, apart from approaching women?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 02:15 PM
1

There’s probably a reason he doesn’t have options.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 02:13 PM
–

Great post that shows the extreme flaws in Redditors’ logic on this sub
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 02:12 PM
-4

I very rarely agree with the women on this sub, but this is spot on.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 01:54 PM
2

What is the unattractive guy in your hypothetical example confident in? If he can’t back it up, it’s not confidence. Same would go for anybody. So maybe he should be confident in something he can back up. And you mean women want attractive men? Wait, so they’re normal human beings? Just like men who want attractive women? Oh no, how could they…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 01:49 PM
8

The difference between confidence and arrogance isn’t in what we think of the person. An ugly person can be confident, and an attractive or extremely talented person can be arrogant. And confidence has been defined. Look it up.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 01:44 PM
4

“not whether you feel secure in yourself.” Lol that’s what confidence is. “One’s attractiveness is 100% up to the opinion of others.” Yes, but his confidence is not; it’s only up to him. And confidence can make a person more attractive to others.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 01:37 PM
2

A few things you’re missing (along with a lot of the guys on here): Confidence always needs to be backed up by performance, and it’s usually without any effort; it doesn’t need all the “talk.” Telling people you’re something is unattractive (duh); instead just be that person already. No need to talk or put on a show. For example, if a man is truly confident in being attractive, he doesn’t go around telling women he thinks he’s attractive or trying to put on a show for her. It will naturally foll…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 01:26 PM
1

I’m surprised the men on here missed this. Both are true. These guys seem to think that being confident means pretending to be something you’re not. No, that’s delusion. Being confident means being happy with who you are, even if you’re a 2 - be happy being a 2. Both your points are true.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 01:12 PM
1

Adios. Get a life lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 03:48 AM
1

Lol You literally just came onto a post from over a whole month ago just to try to get at me. Unfortunately for you, I have a life outside of Reddit, no care or concern in the world about your opinions, and a low tolerance for stupidity. blocked
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 03:47 AM
1

Asking questions that clearly go against the points in the post doesn’t show understanding.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 03:43 AM
1

https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/opinion You’re dumb as hell. That’s my opinion. We’re even.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 03:41 AM
1

But not understood. Got it.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 03:11 AM
1

Opinions are like buttholes…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 03:10 AM
1

The words of someone who didn’t read the post…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 03:09 AM
1

You’re offended? Not my problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 03:07 AM
1

Yeah, I agree that it’s not the negative experience people say it is if you have a secure partner. It makes such a huge difference to be with someone who’s confident and secure in themselves. I only dated an avoidant once. I got out of there so fast, and the crazy thing is that until they actually reflect they don’t even realize that they’re bringing the cycle back around on themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/25 01:44 AM
1

Sounds like you’re reflecting.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/25 10:02 PM
1

Given I didn’t do the same thing you did (trying to call out someone for something I myself am doing), not really.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/25 09:43 PM
1

“… if you need…” Your statement is void right there.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/25 09:42 PM
1

You say I’m struggling. Do you know me? I’m happily married and have a son, btw. So doing literally the same thing you try to call someone out for lmao what a brainless hypocrite
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/25 07:54 PM
0

Like a lot of other users on the internet, it’s a lie to make themselves feel better.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/25 05:00 PM
1

As well as philosophies. I like a woman who’s secure in herself and doesn’t need attention from every Tom, Steve, Harry, Joe, etc. Confidence is attractive in a woman; insecurity is a turn-off to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/25 02:50 PM
1

You - can’t imagine the possibility of someone you don’t like not being a RP watcher/supporter… Lol
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/25 10:32 PM
1

Where did I deny what I say? Pulling shit out of your ass again
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/25 10:19 PM
4

This is true. You can sell anything that gets to people’s “soft spots” or concerns, and it’s kind of sad. As a doctor I get a lot of questions from my patients when new medications come out. And tbh the medicine would probably hurt more than help. It’s just ways to push stuff and make money. Imagine what it would be like if trying to get along with each other and be as healthy as possible made money.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/25 10:18 PM
1

You - pulls stuff out of your ass Me - nope. You’re gonna have to know what you’re talking about to convince me. You - ahhh!!!! This guy must be RP bc I hate RP and he’s a monster so he must watch RP like all the time!!! 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/25 10:05 PM
1

See? You make claims you can’t prove. Full of crap. Lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/25 09:51 PM
1

Still no proof, hmm…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/25 09:48 PM
1

Coming from the guy with absolutely no proof but many claims, that doesn’t say much. Except maybe that you’re backing out and still couldn’t prove, huh?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/25 09:30 PM
1

Still no proof. …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/25 09:22 PM
1

Still no proof of your claims. Just ranting…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/25 09:20 PM
1

Still no proof of your false claims.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/25 09:16 PM
1

Actually, this whole time I’ve claimed I see both BP and RP stuff on Reddit here and I agree with neither. And you still can’t prove your claim/accusation? Ahh…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/25 09:04 PM
1

It’s not derogatory but is false to me when I disagree with almost everything they say. I’m very happy with my choices. You being mad at me for disagreeing with you and claiming I do things I don’t (like you somehow would know my life) says literally everything I need here. Tells me the truth is far away from anything you say.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/25 08:41 PM
1

LOL bro you literally accused me several times of supporting RP, and given I don’t do the things you’ve said, no you don’t “tell the truth.” You’re hilarious.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/25 08:34 PM
1

I haven’t claimed that. You’re talking to a scientist. If you want to get technical, there is no universal truth, hence again you’re wasting time. I love how you accuse me of supporting something I didn’t even know about and yet claim to tell me “the truth.” That’s how I know what you say isn’t the truth and your full of shit tbh.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/25 08:28 PM
1

The study on promiscuity and how it comes with bad qualities… yeah. Plus observation… It’s proof enough for my decision. I didn’t even know my POV on this was RP until you told me. Like I said, if it is, then I give them credit. Give credit where credit is due. But no, overall I’m not RP bc I disagree with everything else I’ve seen them say on here.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/25 08:10 PM
1

I read them. But they don’t prove it, and they don’t disprove my point or the study I was talking about. I’ve met A LOT of promiscuous women and know many. And I could basically redo the study on promiscuity and get the same results. Because it’s everywhere: promiscuous women generally have worse characteristics. And I’m not RP, as I’ve said many times. But if you hate RP and want to put me into it, I think it’s just something you’re saying to people who won’t agree with your view.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/25 08:01 PM
1

Of course I can. Because again, I know the truth for myself. You didn’t give me the truth. You gave me a subjective opinion that doesn’t match real life. Given they chased me around before I was married and I still wouldn’t be with them then, I’ve hurt high n women. I just don’t care though.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/25 07:56 PM
1

“The truth is what it is.” Always. I don’t watch it and neither do I care about BP. I’ve never entertained either. I just know that what I see RPers and BPers on here say, I tend to perfectly agree with neither. If you’re worried about me becoming RP, don’t worry so much bc like I said, I’m married so my views are pointless to anyone but me and maybe my son someday.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/25 07:23 PM
1

Yeah, I don’t know why you replied. I told you that words don’t change my perspective; only observation of life does. You telling me what’s “supposedly” out there doesn’t negate what I see when I’m out there. So yes, you’re wasting time.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/25 07:14 PM
1

I’m married happily and we have a 2-month old son. My perspective isn’t going to affect anyone except me simply because I’m taken and happily so. But no, I disagree that it’s “proven.” That doesn’t invalidate the studies on promiscuity, the insecurity and mental issue traits that tend to come with it, the good traits that come with a virgin, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/25 07:08 PM
5

There are women who know how to love a man but are not sluts. They’re hard to find but well worth the time and effort if you find one. Sluts don’t know how to love. Loving a man and worshipping dick are not the same thing. I prefer a woman who loves me for me, not worships one organ on my body that half the human population have. Not to mention that promiscuity correlates with infidelity dramatically. Your definition of love is weird lol
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/25 07:01 PM
1

If that is ever proven, I’ll change my view. As long as life continues to show me I’m right on this, I will keep my view. Words do not change my view; observation of life does.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/25 06:53 PM
1

I’m not too familiar with it - or BP for that matter. I just know a lot of what I’ve read on both ends I don’t agree with. By everywhere I mean in the world. Not chronically online. It’s everywhere. I have enough dating experience and life experience to know, and again, there’s the validity of the study. I don’t stay chronically online like people you’re talking about. So thanks for the references but not thanks.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/25 06:42 PM
1

I’m 29 so not middle-aged, and tbh I’ve never liked RP but if this is something they push then I have to give them credit. Give credit where it is due. Dude, if it wasn’t true it wouldn’t be everywhere. You calling it lies doesn’t make it lies. If you could prove it wrong, though, like prove that study wrong and show me a bunch of promiscuous women who have the hood traits, be my guest.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/25 06:16 PM
1

Because they use sex as the coping mechanism when lacking these traits. Perfect Example: hoe phase, rebound sex A woman who is more confident in herself and has better judgment would rather engage more with friends or new hobbies or even seek therapy than go into a hoe phase. So it’s more like sex is the effect and the lack of traits is the cause, not the other way around. (When my wife has sex with me, she doesn’t lose her good judgment or her nurturing persona. That would be ridiculous.) When …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/25 06:00 PM
-1

Okay, I get what you mean. I should have been more clear. A Low N woman comes with qualities that a high N woman would not normally come with. Examples: better judgment, nurturing skills, more care and concern, less insecurity and more confidence Then there are the studies on promiscuity that everyone references, and I definitely acknowledge the findings. I couldn’t marry a promiscuous woman. A zero n woman (virgin) comes with the low N qualities but the best of the best judgment, as she was ver…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/25 05:22 PM
0

I don’t understand where you got that assumption from, but feel free to point out what part of what I said gave you that idea. And I disagree that her only value would be sexual. That’s ridiculous. I would never even marry if that was it; I would have just kept fucking women.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/25 05:05 PM
1

Lol You’re that easily offended?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/25 05:01 PM
6

This. We know she will be a much better wife and mother to our kids.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/25 04:53 PM
2

Then why would these men still have sex with women who aren’t virgins before they marry the virgin? If he was insecure, he wouldn’t have sex with non-virgin women at all, especially if he’s well-desired again among the non-virgins.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/25 04:50 PM
5

From a scientific perspective, that’s the gist of it. ^
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/25 04:43 PM
-1

I love when people post these things bc it’s just dismissal of accountability (or simping for the women). Most men who would not marry a woman who is not a virgin would still have sex with women who aren’t. I did that. It has nothing to do with my sexual performance, as I’ve fucked women and they always would try to come over again and again. It’s just that a woman’s SMV goes down with count, and I wanted the top value. I wanted to spend the rest of my life with a modest unbroken woman who’s a g…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/25 04:39 PM
1

Traits, yes. And to answer your question: mostly because they’re feminine traits that I’m not expected to have as a man, and that a woman wouldn’t want in a man anyway tbh. So it doesn’t say anything negative about me or the man: it does for the woman bc they’re feminine traits. Back to OP’s point about each gender expects different things from a heterosexual partner.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/25 04:34 PM
0

Yeah, I think a lot of “egalitarians” and the like don’t really want “equality” : they just want some hypothetical scenario that’s more beneficial to them, tipping the scale more in their favor. Bc they always seem to overlook these areas where men and women actually want different things and that’s normal. I couldn’t agree with your post more. The only potential flaw I see in it is don’t bother everyone about it. Speaking of dudes who harass women bc they’re not what they want - just bypass her…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/25 04:31 PM
1

Of course you’d have a problem admitting to it. You can’t even admit you blocked me or were wrong. But dw, everyone can see lol Actually, I’d be cool with that. But I don’t think you’d do it. You’d unblock me like you did the first time. 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/25 09:47 PM
1

I refuse to. Doesn’t mean I can’t; just means I won’t. Yeah, there was a great debate and I won. Hence why you blocked me and went on a completely separate account to reply and show your insecurities.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/25 09:42 PM
1

I haven’t gotten anything back but crying and wussy fits (a.k.a. Blocking then going on another account to reply then unblocking me)
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/25 09:33 PM
1

Ahh so now you’re both lying as well as trying to curse me out. And you’ve even deleted your own comment from earlier to which I was replying. 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/25 09:21 PM
1

So you blocked me, got on another account to reply to me, and now unblocked me on this one? 🤣 You need a psychiatrist.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/25 09:14 PM
1

The fact that you made a whole new account and came back to reply says everything. I don’t block random people on Reddit, especially ones who block someone bc they can’t prove their own argument. Lol Grow some balls. And maybe fix that hole in your argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/25 09:07 PM
1

@MarioWilson122 LOL Blocking me right after you post is just a show that you can’t win and have no balls. Thanks for indirectly telling me I’m right lol
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/25 08:15 PM
1

Yeah, but giving it up to him quickly - afterward he will still leave. I didn’t disagree with you there. That’s where, again, she needs to be wiser because she hasn’t lost anything in him as he wasn’t dedicated to her anyway; she lost in SMV though. And no, you’re not defiantly right about that. Nobody should wait “forever,” but if the woman wants something long-term and serious, giving it up fast will get her the opposite of that either way: either alone since the HVM leaves, or she ends up wit…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/25 07:36 PM
2

I disagree with the first statement. As a HVM, one thing we look for in a woman is modesty and not giving herself to everyone. So if he has decided to leave her for the reason you mentioned, he wasn’t looking for something long-term anyway and she doesn’t lose anything when he leaves. The lying about body count is one thing that traps them. I think you know this, as a fellow man. When having sex with a woman, usually even before the fucking, you can tell if she’s been around. She can lie, but yo…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/25 06:45 PM
2

This is where women screw themselves up. They could avoid this problem altogether if they made men wait. And then, of course, if she doesn’t make him wait, she’s probably not long-term material for a valuable man anyway so she gets left or ends up with a low-value man like you mentioned.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/25 06:24 PM
3

If you’re looking for a long-term serious experience, this OP is why it’s wise to make sure the person wants to be in a fully committed relationship with you for the right reasons BEFORE you have sex. If you want something serious but give sex too quickly… well… why buy the cow when the milk is free? My wife wouldn’t fuck with anybody until she and I were together, partially for this reason that OP expresses: she refused to be used. Of course she had bazillions of opportunities and expressed sui…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/25 06:21 PM
1

I answered it. You just wanna keep saying I didn’t so as to keep this going in circles.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/25 04:30 PM
1

I did. That’s why you can’t contradict it and have added nothing to the argument over the last like 10 or so comments 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/25 04:09 PM
1

You were the one projecting to the other user, and I called you out. Now you’re saying I’m projecting 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/25 03:59 PM
1

I have more than a guy who just admitted he’s ugly. I can almost guarantee it. You can’t toss what you don’t have. Lol
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/25 03:24 PM
1

Not a concession. I’m not wrong; you are. You want to talk in circles, and I have a life.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/25 03:23 PM
5

“Romance isn’t just about sexual attraction, it’s basically just where “thoughtfulness” meets “narrative”.” TAKE NOTES BOYS ☝🏻
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/25 10:29 AM
1

Says someone who is offended lmaooo I don’t allow people to follow me on Reddit because I don’t know anyone on here personally. If that’s your way of calling me smart and yourself not so much, I appreciate the insight. Lol
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/25 10:15 AM
4

Supply and demand. That’s why they call dating a market. So like he said, it’s all about what you bring to the table. If all you can bring is money, you can expect to be used for that. And based on your Calvin Klein model comment, I’m guessing you’re not exactly far above ugly yourself bc it sounds like you’re projecting.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/25 09:32 AM
1

Haven’t dodged anything and have better things to do than talk in circles
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/25 06:05 PM
1

First sentence again shows that you can’t comprehend. At this point I think it’s proven.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/25 05:04 PM
1

I read the first sentence, which verified that you can’t read and comprehend. So neglected the rest
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/25 04:46 PM
2

I haven’t downvoted your post, but if someone did that’s cool. Lol Put your big boy undies on and get over it. “Sticking fingers in ears like I don’t see it…” … LOL you do realize that hearing and seeing are two different senses, right? How would plugging ears indicate that one doesn’t see something? And Yeah, I know because you sound like a 5-year-old tbh
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/25 04:07 PM
2

You did not mention other things that matter, and you treated it as if it’s the only thing that mattered. He’s right. You’re wrong. Boo hoo 😢
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/25 04:01 PM
2

He’s right. He’s talking about putting effort into relationships and the other person, not things for yourself that are also beneficial outside a relationship. You said he thought those things don’t help, but nowhere did he say that. He said the opposite. You have the reading comprehension problems of a blind bat and are projecting it onto other users. Got it. And if you’re waiting on me to say we were wrong, you’re wasting your time.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/25 03:59 PM
2

Actually, He’s right. And the only reason you would feel led to bring up religion or some kind of philosophical view on sex. Lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/25 03:49 PM
3

He didn’t say those things don’t help. (Can you not read and so you project your uneducated stance onto others?) He’s pointing out that you mentioned ONLY those things and failed to include other things that matter. I’m jacked because I go to the gym daily and am considered an attractive guy. And I make a good 6-figure annual salary. But if I never spent time with my wife or showed that I care about her feelings neither my muscles nor my bank account would matter and she would leave. Rightfully …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/25 03:45 PM
–

The instinct is still there. Changing a societal issue doesn’t rewire a genetic code.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/25 05:32 PM
1

But it’s not in every case. And I explained how it’s not, given the indiscriminateness and how I haven’t been indiscriminate. Hmm… Idk. Bc idk what my abilities would be like otherwise. No need to skirt around it though bc I do pair bond very well, which makes that point moot. If I had to guess, I’d say yeah it’s the same or at least very close - enough that the difference is not significant. I’m not one to avoid something like that; if I needed therapy I’d go, especially for the sake of my wife…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/25 06:20 PM
1

No you didn’t or you didn’t comprehend it because I didn’t distinguish certain ways. And you haven’t told me how im indiscriminate… Yes, there are. That in itself could make a good case for me not being “maximally discriminate,” if you’re into the whole “it’s not binary, it’s a spectrum” approach. I never said my ability to pair bond couldn’t have been damaged. I said it hasn’t been. My scientific basis for that is that I’m emotionally fine and I do pair bond well. And you still have no contradi…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/25 06:08 PM
1

You clearly haven’t read how I explained how I am still discriminate. Yes, very arbitrary. Did you just figure that out? Because I put that in the original post lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/25 05:49 PM
1

Then I confirmed it, not contradicted it. If I’m saying something is subjective, how can I simultaneously be saying that everything is not subjective? It’s called fwb. Many people have fwb relationships, and back in that time I would be fwb with a woman like you mentioned but not with a promiscuous one. I believe I started my entire post with specifying that I hold an uncommon or “not represented” view, yes? Or did you not comprehend that part as well?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/25 05:40 PM
1

Everything is subjective. Even things we consider like math - still subjective due to necessity of observation, which comes with limited perspective. Are you familiar with the Munchausen Trilemma? I already went over the reason I wouldn’t marry a woman like you mentioned. If you didn’t read it, that’s on you. I also specify why promiscuous is a lot worse than someone who’s discriminate but a non-virgin. If you chose not to focus on that and only on my reason for choosing to marry a virgin, again…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/25 05:15 PM
1

If you don’t know the things I asked, you can’t make the assertions you said without lying. So you lied. As I said. Lol And that immaturity and also lying as an automatic defense is why I drew that conclusion.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/25 04:28 PM
1

It does matter to me. How do you conclude that it doesn’t? Correct. But the first definition does not specify a certain number as the line to be crossed, making it subjective. I interpret definitions fine. You need to learn to interpret EVERYTHING you read because you’ve made several mistakes here just in this conversation.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/25 04:15 PM
1

No, I don’t consider myself promiscuous because I was very discriminate, and just because you can do something doesn’t mean you always take the opportunity. I already explained my stance in a reply to another user. Some woman asked basically the same thing. (It’s a good question, btw.) You can look at my reply to her. And yes, I consider it a binary yes or no.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/25 11:30 AM
1

Nope. I never mentioned a number. Promiscuity is defined as “indiscriminateness” by the dictionary. It doesn’t mention a number. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/promiscuity I haven’t even looked at the link. I don’t trust a random Reddit user who makes incorrect assumptions instead of comprehending the text, and also I’m literally a neurobiologist, so if it’s something true chances are I’ve seen it.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/25 10:18 AM
2

Oh wow, now you’re saying I said the OPPOSITE of what I even said. Bro, I said it DOES negatively affect the ability to pair bond, and women started jumping down my throat. If you’ve seen the research that says it does, then you’re agreeing with me and you were dumb enough not to even know it 😂You just made a mistake in assuming I can’t pair bond or that I was promiscuous. But ngl, now I’m a bit worried bc a dude who can’t comprehend and makes dumb assumptions agreed with me. If it wasn’t based …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/25 08:07 AM
1

I’m a neurobiologist lol An uneducated Reddit user isn’t gonna teach me about the brain
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/25 07:56 AM
0

You didn’t read the part about the 1 minute or 6 years, or either you didn’t understand it. Let me break it down. Me not wanting to marry a woman with a count at all does not mean she is promiscuous. It says a lot about my preference; it doesn’t say that she is necessarily promiscuous. However, it does emphasize that I would not be with a promiscuous woman. Technically, whatever her N count, whether she is promiscuous or not would depend on whether she was indiscriminate. For example, in the 6 y…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/25 07:50 AM
1

I’m not emotionally damaged.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/25 07:37 AM
1

How would you know where I got my graduate degree (which would speak to how fancy my grad attire was)? You can’t know. How would you know how many women I’ve fucked? You can’t, Clearly you lie. Lying =/= winning lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/25 05:46 AM
1

You’re lying. Nah, I won. Literally everything you just said is a lie.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/25 05:44 AM
1

I’m 9 inches. Not small by any standard. Lol You should tell that to my boss/PI. She says I think too much. Lol (She holds a Ph.D. and you’re prob a high school drop out.) Sounds more like you’re just a guy who can’t please a woman so you have to rely on those who are just looking for a one-time random experience and have had plenty.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/25 05:15 AM
1

Nah, you give it to her perfectly and she will enjoy it. I’ve fucked virgins, so I know. My wife, for example, thoroughly enjoys sex and has since I introduced her to it the first time.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/25 05:04 AM
1

I just told you.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/25 01:01 AM
1

She was a virgin when we fucked the first time. We married later.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/25 01:00 AM
2

Nope. She wouldn’t have married me if she was missing out. She’s too smart for that.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/25 12:59 AM
2

I never said it was =. You’re making assumptions. Neither my wife nor I was promiscuous. I don’t think we will have a problem maintaining what we have long-term.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/25 12:57 AM
2

Oh, you can’t show where I said sex is bad and you made that up? That’s what I thought. It’s not just that you had sex. I have sex multiple times every day with my wife. The act of sex makes the world go around. It’s a beautiful part of nature. I have a two-month-old son. I’m not condemning sex. Lol What distinguishes your decision as promiscuity is the indiscriminateness (literally the definition in Webster dictionary : https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/promiscuity ). As with anything …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/25 05:59 PM
3

When did I say sex was bad? Show me. I said promiscuity is bad, and the evidence is in the research. Nah. I love my wife for the woman she is, and part of who she is is that she’s a very good decision maker and extremely passionate but wise and secure in herself. Yes, if you change anything about her she would not be the same person and I wouldn’t love her the same. Because I love her just the way she is. You could use any other of her traits, too. Example: She’s a nurse and is very caring. If s…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/25 05:49 PM
3

I love my wife more than anything in this world. No idea where your last part came from. Yeah, what I said is true and is all in research. Promiscuity and insecurity or even infidelity aren’t exactly strangers. Lol As a scientist, research is the proof.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/25 05:27 PM
3

I guess I’m an outlier on this bc my view doesn’t seem to be represented in the comments. So I’ll express: “Waiting” , making me wait, etc. has never been a concern for me. I would definitely prefer a modest woman who makes me - and everyone - wait then marries me (as she’s a virgin, made all wait) over one who fucks me fast but fucks with everyone. The first one I could marry; the second one I wouldn’t even date. I like modesty. I like the ability to teach my wife everything, be the one she run…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/25 05:21 PM
3

So promiscuous/bad judgment then. Doing something to feel good in the moment versus making a better decision that’ll have better consequences down the road. (Promiscuous women tend to have low self esteem and be insecure, with motivations in seeking validation and like I said making bad judgment for in the moment. To answer your question) And I’m married already. My wife enjoys sex with me and we have a fantastic sex life. Would I want her if she was promiscuous? Hell no.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/25 05:02 PM
1

Nah, loose ones suck. Tight is best 👌🏼 Especially if she’s new to it and you get to teach her through it …. Mmmmmmm
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/25 04:51 PM
6

If she doesn’t like the guy why have sex so fast? Talk about insecurity and low self-esteem. Glad I kept my standards high. I def would not want something like that in a wife. Eew.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/25 04:50 PM
2

This. His reason for courting her makes all the difference. If he’s just in it for sex he won’t care about your body count. If he wants something long-term or a good relationship or a wife, of course the standards are higher.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/25 04:47 PM
0

Nah, if a woman brought the case in then there would be consequences. They don’t because they don’t feel violated when it’s another woman doing it, unless they already have some reason to fear said woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/25 04:03 PM
0

I still don’t think much would change. Women don’t feel as violated when it’s another woman. If they did, they could take her to court the same way they do men. But they don’t.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/25 03:50 PM
2

Lol That’s like asking what’s 2+2. 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/25 03:24 PM
3

If it’s consented to (as most women are when it’s their female friends doing these things), it can’t go anywhere. Whoever took it to court would just look like a fool. Get into the courtroom Judge: Did your friend, said perpetrator, do anything out of your will or that you feel violated you? Woman: No. We do that all the time. Case dismissed. Lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/25 03:20 PM
5

Domestic violence is much higher in men than women.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/25 03:17 PM
0

Stupidity and insecurity. No wonder they have problems getting dates.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/25 05:46 AM
3

Okay not “all,” but yeah a lot of them are. Read them.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/25 08:50 PM
3

Read all the other responses on this same post by OP then. Bc they all are saying the same thing I’m saying. If you don’t understand it, oh well. Teaching special ed wasn’t my major. Tbh I could take the time and explain it but you’ll get the same thing by just reading the other responses that are saying the same thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/25 08:41 PM
2

Idk. Hard to imagine. I’d probably change it to prefer being shot in the head then bc a quick death is less painful than a slow one or than living on traumatized.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/25 05:52 PM
2

I just know that as a man I can easily defend myself in the scenario and there’s probably no reason for the man to come at me. For a woman that’s not the case and she could be a lot more at risk. So I can’t speak for them.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/25 05:47 PM
2

“…or knew that it was bad.” Exactly. I don’t know what a woman would choose in your scenario - besides that between a man and a bear they apparently choose a bear.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/25 05:39 PM
2

Yes, I know I don’t want to be raped. That doesn’t require pretending. (Your lack of logical sense is insane.) Your hypothetical requires imagining I’m a woman. So no, I can’t answer it. I don’t know what it’s like to be a woman. Again, ASK A WOMAN since you want a woman’s perspective. Lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/25 05:34 PM
2

Rape, by definition, is FORCED sex (bad). Women who haven’t been raped can know that they don’t want to be forced. Anything that is by definition bad or good doesn’t need to be experienced to know it’s bad or good.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/25 05:30 PM
2

You wish lmao Eating dog shit - you’ve smelled it and smell coordinates with taste so you know it would taste bad. If I’m wrong why don’t you just prove it to me? Oh wait, you can’t.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/25 05:25 PM
2

Again, tangent that has nothing to do with the OP. Good day.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/25 05:09 PM
1

The difference and why I can pretend to have not eaten breakfast but can’t pretend to be a woman: I’ve been without breakfast before (recently btw) and so I know what it feels like. I’ve never lived as a woman. Your logic is super flawed. It’s easy to pretend something you’ve experienced recently or several times. It can be impossible to pretend something you’ve never experienced at all. Wow! You’re taking a complete tangent that has nothing to do with the original topic and have extremely flawe…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/25 05:07 PM
2

Horrible and a little sick/weak What does eating breakfast have to do with the topic at hand? 😂 Waste of time for such tangents. Good day.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/25 04:55 PM
2

Idk, I’m not a good pretender. If I was I probably would’ve been an actor. How about ask a woman?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/25 04:50 PM
2

Come across a random man in the woods. Easy. I carry weapons and have a permit, and I fight well. I can easily defend myself. I don’t think a guy is gonna mess with me anyway unless I mess with him first. (I’m not a woman, so I don’t see why he would.) What does that question have to do with anything? If it’s for comparison, you’re asking the wrong person. I’m not a woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/25 04:46 PM
1

Nope. It makes you uncomfortable to blame women. And apparently you like going in circles
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/25 03:43 PM
1

The post is also about faults when creating fatherless kids. Put your big girl panties on and don’t be so triggered when you have a mirror in front of you. :)
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/25 03:35 PM
1

It was stupid from the moment you posted it, which is why I said I don’t see what you’re contributing. Lol Have a blessed day.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/25 03:05 PM
1

You should be teaching the women who posted the meme. Lol I actually don’t disagree with your first paragraph. Again, for like the 10th time, I’ve shown how your argument is flawed bc the original meme was not based on probability but on capability.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/25 03:03 PM
1

Even if he does, I’m still not referencing those parts, just the ones of the original meme. Why? Because I can. I don’t have to reply to something I have no interest in.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/25 03:01 PM
1

Bc the OP here is based on the original meme, not the responses. And I’m replying to the OP here.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/25 02:59 PM
1

Bc if I just said men are at fault I’d be telling half the story (what you did) and excluding the same half you excluded. There would be no point in even posting that here bc you provided a good explanation of men being at fault already. Actually, you never mention the whole Danish thing in the OP, hence why I posted. No. It pains me to only acknowledge half of a whole story.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/25 02:53 PM
1

Bc I don’t care anything about the responses. I’m talking about only the original meme and the meaning, intentions, and implications with it. My post here was about the original meme, and you start on about the responses. This is why I said you’re not contributing anything to my post.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/25 02:50 PM
2

Nope. I’m saying the women who posted the meme lumped all men as predators. They weren’t referencing normal men. And any man could plausibly attack her, and most bears wouldn’t. A man can rape her. A bear can’t. Literally this is the basis of the meme, so it’s as relevant as relevant can get. Lol It’s the entire point of the meme, which, again, is not based on probability. You’re ignoring the other aspect of danger, which is capability. True, but she’s referencing that men are rapists. And again…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/25 02:47 PM
1

Only afterward in defense. The original post wasn’t about bears. It was aimed at men and they could’ve used practically any big fighting animal in the bear’s place. Unless you can prove that it was, you’re wasting time.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/25 02:41 PM
3

Oh, their responses were about bears, yeah. But I said the original meme wasn’t. They probably started talking about bears and those stats just out of defense. I don’t disagree with that. And yes, I still fail to see how this adds to the discussion of what I said. I still don’t believe the original meme was about bears.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/25 02:27 PM
2

I disagree because again, for the third time, the meme isn’t based on the chance of her being attacked by either and you have assumed that it is. No, the meme is based on WHAT could be done by either. The bear would just maul her to death. The man could do a lot of things, including leave her alive and forever traumatized. (Did you not read my other comment?) Perceived danger has multiple aspects, not just one. There’s the perspective of chance of an act, but there’s also the perspective of capa…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/25 02:21 PM
0

I know that, but again, the meme wasn’t based on who is more likely to attack her. So your argument is irrelevant. Most often a predator or criminal will initiate an act when he’s unobserved and won’t when he is observed. If you deny that you’re either a kid who doesn’t know about society or delusional. Nobody said the supposed man is normal; that’s something you added for bias again. Presence of witnesses matters significantly on whether a wrongful act would be committed by the man. Then the qu…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/25 01:57 PM
1

Aha. You just proved my point. Lol I said men are at fault but so are women. You’re wanting to blame just men only. That in itself says everything here. If men were the only problem, I’d say that. But they’re not. So the real issue here is you don’t like female accountability.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/25 01:48 PM
1

This. OP’s post basically asking how he can improve himself for women… I mean, I didn’t come up with the word “simp,” but his post demonstrates it so well. Lol And he doesn’t even realize that’s not attractive to women bc they want a man who has his head on straight and is good regardless, doesn’t revolve around women.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/25 01:43 PM
5

When you improve yourself for yourself, people will notice and you will be in the right environment with others of the same. If you want to improve just only for women, you’re already dooming yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/25 01:37 PM
2

I was gonna say this. Do it for yourself, OP.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/25 01:35 PM
2

It’s very realistic and has been done many times. Presence of witnesses isn’t moot at all; it can even determine whether he does it or not. Context for sure matters. I understand the point of adding the trail, but it does bias the scenario and the message. And I agree with your last paragraph. It would have been a lot more logical for women to just show how many women have been affected by trauma by men (have experienced it directly or know someone personally who has). I think the reason for the…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/25 01:20 PM
7

I think a man would be more likely to abuse her in the woods, given there’s significantly less observation by others. What makes you think he’d be more likely to do it on a public trail?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/25 01:15 PM
2

I fail to see how this contributes to what I said. Enlighten me if you want. And I don’t believe it’s about bears. Women could have used any other big fighting animal for the same thing. I agree that women aren’t logical at all lol, but the gist of what they’re saying is just that men can be dangerous. In other words, it would have been a lot more logical to just show how many women today either have experienced direct trauma by a man or know a woman who has. But they used the meme to get more a…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/25 01:12 PM
1

No idea. Is there a stat on that? I doubt it.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/25 12:52 PM
2

The original meme doesn’t even say anything about a trail. OP biased it by adding that to it. And the decision by women to prefer the bear isn’t based on the probability of a bad encounter. So how likely she is to encounter the bear or the man is irrelevant
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/25 12:48 PM
6

As a man I agree with this. If women used the metaphor to weed out smart men vs. ones to avoid, they did a good job. Lol
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/25 12:46 PM
4

I disagree. There are less likely to be other observers in the woods vs. on a trail. That’s ideal for something like a murder, rape, or sexual trauma. And no, it doesn’t help both sides or base the argument. It actually leans toward a side and biases it, considering bears are more likely to attack a human in their natural habitat (in the woods) as opposed to on a trail.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/25 12:44 PM
8

Where you’re wrong: Their preference for the bear instead of the man isn’t based on probability of attack/how likely one is to hurt them. You seem to think it is. It’s based on what could be done by each and based on experienced/already observed situations. A bear, at the worst, will just maul the woman to death. A man could do… a lot of things, sometimes even leaving her alive to remember it forever. The original meme doesn’t even mention a trail. It just says in the woods. Makes a huge differe…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/25 12:40 PM
1

Let’s say he is blue collar. Still, he’s an outlier. Most (>98%) of blue collar workers don’t own businesses or even know how to manage one. And most white collar workers probably make more than your husband does. So my point still stands: White collar workers make a hell of a lot more.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 01:11 PM
1

Let’s say he is blue collar. Still, he’s an outlier. Most (>98%) of blue collar workers don’t own businesses or even know how to manage one. So my point still stands: White collar workers make a hell of a lot more.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 01:11 PM
1

Look up white collar jobs meaning. You’ll see that every definition, no matter which site you go to, includes managerial tasks or project management. Business owners do those things, like you’re talking about managing employees,/helpers, whether it’s one or 10,000. You can be white collar and still do blue collar activities.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 12:58 PM
2

A business owner is still considered white collar. For example, one of my buddies owns a roofing company and he started off doing the work himself in construction (blue collar). When he started his own company he became white collar, even though he helps out sometimes. Like I’m a physician and researcher and I go hunting and fishing sometimes (blue collar), but I’m still considered white collar. Business owners are white collar.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 12:48 PM
3

Yeah. Once they become a business owner they’re white collar.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 12:23 PM
1

Still can’t refute or answer the question… lol And still can’t comprehend. Lol I’ll wait until you actually refute my argument or answer the question.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 07:59 AM
1

Irrelevant. The contrast is the point.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 02:59 AM
3

You said blue collar makes more. I showed otherwise by contrasting the two categories with jobs of the same tier in each. Don’t care whether you could be a surgeon or not And most blue collar people NEVER make what you make - not even half of it, even. White collar makes more.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 02:49 AM
2

Your very first comment to me: “How is it that you agree with me but you immediately talk about women? It looks like you can’t bring up when men cause problems without immediately pivoting to women. Similarly, it’s like when guys wanna bring up men’s issues, they never want to talk about how men contribute to the issues men are dealing with, they always have to talk about feminists.” That’s defensive/triggered. The way you say I can’t focus on the topic at hand while simultaneously saying I’m fo…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 02:46 AM
2

Simple explanation: You’re triggered when someone mentions that women are just as at fault as men. Explains this whole thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 02:25 AM
1

No, you called him my ancestry. I pointed out that he’s one in infinitely many ancestors; he’s not the whole ancestry. Read back. No one can but her. And nope, you’re still avoiding the question and the real argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 02:24 AM
2

You didn’t call out that story in your OP. Hence why my post here originally was to show the fault of both genders. I’ve condemned both men and women. You only condemned men in your OP.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 01:56 AM
2

More like unbiased. You were defensive for not mentioning women. I’m condemning both. So you consider telling both sides of the truth as reflexive? Okay. You can have your opinion. You didn’t blame women in your post here, so I pointed it out.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 01:53 AM
1

Previous post : “ He’s in it but he doesn’t represent billions. You have shit ancestry somewhere as well, guaranteed. We all do. You agreed with him, so if he’s shit so are you, And your lack of understanding of statistics is your issue. I won’t teach you basics bc to you even first grade math would be “complicated.” “ And this is where I said he is my ancestor and you were saying he’s my entire ancestry. You can’t remember your arguments and like to project onto me and others. Tangent again. Yo…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 01:08 AM
3

Coming from a man Actually, white collar jobs pay more. It all depends on what you do. Conducting a train is top-tier blue collar; the top-tier white collar jobs pay about $200k-$300k a year more than that, on average. (Ex.: surgeons) Idk what your degree is in, but do what you enjoy and don’t worry about what other people think of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 12:48 AM
1

As I’ve done the whole time, I’ve said he’s an ancestor. DUH. You said he’s my whole ancestry, you were wrong. You can’t read 😂 Tbh you shouldn’t expect bc I can’t imagine a woman would even want you. No wonder you have low standards. I’ve already said I’m not responsible for my grandma’s decisions. And that doesn’t refute my point that living on sandwiches and choosing not to clean after yourself is lazy LOL (it even has nothing to do with it) and you also still didn’t refute! 😂😂😂
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 12:37 AM
2

I just answered this. Both are at fault. You presented a truthful HALF of a story. I presented the other half. You’re offended as hell that I said women are just as at fault as the men. Lol Do you even know what a reflex is? My response is well-supported by details and facts. Reflexes are quick responses that usually don’t even make sense bc they’re just defense. How can I be attacked by something I agree with? That makes no sense. You are offended that women are the other half of the fault. Hen…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 12:32 AM
2

I already said those men are shit. What part of “I AGREE” don’t you understand? Im saying those women are shit too, and that’s the part you don’t like. 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 12:25 AM
1

Another comment where you STILL don’t refute. I answered that question : I was talking about the dudes who are lazy, and my granddad is the one out of infinitely many in my ancestry who is. So he’s an example. How would the rest fit when they are good, hardworking men who can cook if they need to? You make no sense, but I expect that now. I asked you a question, too : if you expect the cleaning and cooking from a woman, why can’t you do it? And you avoided the question for like 24 hrs now 😂 Have…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 12:24 AM
1

It doesn’t. I literally said I agree with it. You’re the one it seems to bother when someone points out the two-sided truth and that women are just as much at fault.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 12:19 AM
2

Lol I didn’t target you. I don’t expect you to do shit. I just pointed out the flaw in your argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 12:18 AM
1

Bc your post points out where men are wrong on this topic, which is true. It just leaves out the other half of the story, which is how women are just as wrong. Is it that hard to comprehend? How about both genders take responsibility for themselves and stop blaming and projecting all their issues onto the other? But you don’t want to look in the mirror…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 12:10 AM
1

As a man I agree with everything you said. But you leave out that the woman is just as much at fault. Except for rape cases (a minority), it takes two to tango. Yeah, the guy isn’t gonna tell you he’s a deadbeat, but why not make sure first before fucking just bc it’s possible? Both are at fault. Both should take accountability and responsibility. Edit: Just to add… Every single mother I’ve met made horrible decisions. There may be some exceptions and of course this is just my biased perspective…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 12:00 AM
2

You ignore that when men bail when they find out she’s pregnant the law can’t hold him responsible because then he’s not there to provide a DNA sample, much less care for the kid.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 11:57 PM
1

No you can’t or you would’ve done it long before now lol Refuting the point would be staying perfectly on topic and is what anybody knows to do in a debate. Anybody with a suitable IQ, that is.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 11:49 PM
1

You showed it in that you haven’t done it yet. And yeah, it was the entire point of this whole conversation. Thanks for basically showing - again - that you can’t.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 02:15 PM
1

You showed it in that you haven’t done it yet. And yeah, it was the entire point of this whole conversation. Thanks for basically showing - again - that you can’t.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 02:15 PM
1

I didn’t say you agreed. I said you couldn’t refute it. You LOVE projecting, bro. You say I said stuff I haven’t said, and when I show it to you, you take tangents. AND you started trying to insult me and all that immature mess first. Anybody who reads this knows you’re the one with comprehension problems. Project all you want!
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 01:36 PM
1

Let me make this easy for you. Ancestry (the word we were talking about which you brought up) From Google: Ancestry is a person's family descent or lineagea person's family descent or lineage, referring to the line of individuals from which they are biologically or culturally descended. Key words: line of INDIVIDUALS (Notice that S on the end, which makes it plural.) I never said my granddad isn’t my ancestor; I said he’s not my entire ancestry. It took you that long to figure out I don’t know w…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 01:32 PM
1

I never said we decided on a principle. I said we ESTABLISHED a principle. The way to establish a principle in a debate forum is for one to present a principle or idea that the other cannot refute. But I know you can’t read. I’m not surprised you’re saying I said something I didn’t.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 01:21 PM
1

When you defended his lifestyle of not doing anything for himself and living on PB&Js when he didn’t have a woman I just said that, btw. 😂YOU can’t read.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 01:18 PM
1

Oh, you mean that YOU started? Ohhh… bro can give insults that bounce off bc they make no sense but he can’t take real ones 🤣 I wasn’t wrong? Look it up in the dictionary, for God sake. I don’t speak for my grandma. You’re just stuck on that bc you can’t successfully argue against me. :) Yeah, that’s EXACTLY what a low IQ person would say, given that any normal (or higher) IQ person easily knows why I used my granddad as an example but he does not represent a group of infinitely many. I never sa…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 01:16 PM
1

You and I Get an IQ test. If you’re above 80 I’ll continue this, but I don’t expect you are.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 01:12 PM
2

So you already forgot the beginning of this where we established that the principle of a man doing these things for himself makes him a better family-making partner and shows he’s not lazy. KEEP UP.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 01:09 PM
1

Yeah, your ancestry must be full of low-IQ people. IQ is mainly genetic, and clearly yours isn’t top-tier. YOU said you agree with him (indirectly). I posted about his lifestyle, and you defended it. You’re just as shit as he is in that regard, except he has much better reasoning skills. YOU brought up ancestry, and YOU focused on my granddad, saying he was the only one of my ancestry. Grow some balls and go to school
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 01:03 PM
1

Nobody said anything about cooking elaborate meals every day. The discussion revolves around basic everyday skills of self care like basic cooking and cleaning after yourself. If there weren’t so many men in heterosexual relationships and even with kids who have never even seen a construction job, you might already a little bit of sense. If people gave zero fucks about opinions (as they should), they wouldn’t be on Reddit having these kinds of discussions. LOL Your opinion versus the facts = The…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 10:15 AM
2

I already explained. See my paragraph where I explained it, referencing it matters when they get together and want a family.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 05:06 AM
1

He’s in it but he doesn’t represent billions. You have shit ancestry somewhere as well, guaranteed. We all do. You agreed with him, so if he’s shit so are you, And your lack of understanding of statistics is your issue. I won’t teach you basics bc to you even first grade math would be “complicated.”
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 05:04 AM
1

He’s one out of practically infinitely many. Same with any human being. One says nothing about a group that large. Don’t worry, I know you don’t know basic math. It would be too “complicated” for you. And I couldn’t care less what her reasons were. But I’ll lyk other stuff when I bring your diapers.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 03:49 AM
2

I haven’t complained. I explained part of OP’s position that she didn’t really go into. Why do you care why I care or how it might impact me? It doesn’t now that I’m married, but it’s so nice of you to care about me. I forgot that babies change emotions so fast like that.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 03:47 AM
1

My granddad is one person. You clearly don’t know the definition of ancestry. (I’m not surprised.) And you call him not shit based on that (I agree), but yet you agreed with him 😂 How about you grow some balls. It would help you a lot, so you’re not so easily offended at everything and shitting your pants when you can’t even make an argument without a tangent and want to blame it on someone else. Who castrated you?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 03:45 AM
2

Keep whining 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 03:42 AM
3

More like drawing a conclusion based on observations of many but not enough. Would need to know the stats
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 03:42 AM
2

Says the dude who thinks it’s complicated to clean up after himself. How about you grow the fuck up? Hate the truth too much, huh? So not only is cleaning up after yourself too complicated for you, you get offended very easily. On my way to get those diapers for ya 😂😂
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 03:41 AM
2

You created the tangent to comparing basic simple stuff to living in a mansion, and you tell ME to keep up? And now you assume you know my ancestry by some magic? No wonder you have issues. Will get those diapers for you
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 03:38 AM
1

Wasn’t talking about you. I said the men who do as you’re saying are probably mediocre in other areas. One guy can’t speak for what’s probably millions.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 03:36 AM
7

The men who complain like that are just as funny. And here on Reddit, there’s a lot more of them than of the women. They’re all hilarious, aren’t they?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 03:35 AM
1

Lol not at all Do you think you know what I believe? What’s my religion? My political view? Or is it just that being lazy is what you believe in and you’re projecting?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 03:33 AM
7

You comparing simply cleaning up after yourself (which keeps down germs and is so basic, not to mention you’d expect it from a wife) to having 14 pillows in a mansion is INSANE 😂😂 Where did I complain? Ooohhhh someone is #offended LMAO
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 03:31 AM
8

Same to you when you want women to be a certain way then. If you can’t take their standards (says a lot that cleaning up after yourself is too high for you), then they shouldn’t try to do anything for you either and you can’t complain without being hypocritical. Yeah, you probably will die alone like that.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 02:39 AM
8

You think cleaning up after yourself is complicated? That says A LOT. You just told on yourself. Lol P.S. I’m married and have a son. Telling the truth isn’t the same as complaining. I’ll get you some adult diapers when I go to the store lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 02:37 AM
3

I’m saying that shows he’s lazy and not worth her consideration when she wants a family. And I pointed out that if women did that you’d freak bc then everybody would be adult babies. You got stuck there… lol You wouldn’t prefer a woman who only makes you sandwiches over one who can make you good meals, right? So to the question you avoided: If she can, why can’t you? Just lazy.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 02:35 AM
6

Ask her. Edit: If you’re meaning to my second paragraph, because that’s all there are. Most men who are worth it in other areas and catch womens attention don’t do these basic things and want someone to take care of them.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 02:28 AM
10

“Can” is one thing. Choosing to do that over clean up after himself or make basic meals - yeah, it says he’s lazy and probably of no good to her.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 02:28 AM
-3

Income, status, looks, personality, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 02:26 AM
3

You were encouraging sticking with sandwiches instead of learning to do basic things like cook and clean, so no, you were encouraging laziness. And I pointed out the problem You really think men would learn these things if women didn’t do it for them?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 02:25 AM
9

Are you saying you want her to cook and clean? Oh, now we’re getting somewhere… If she can, why can’t you? What more are you contributing? She shouldn’t clean up after a grown man, unless he’s providing something she can’t. For example, if he makes 5x the income as she could. Hunt your game but wash your plate after you eat the deer jerky. Make sense? In other words, don’t be a baby. Taking care of yourself with or without a woman should be expected.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 02:09 AM
19

She can do the same: live on sandwiches, don’t do dishes, etc. The problem is that when they get together to create a family and a life together, he’s useless besides being a sperm donor. And for that she could just go to a clinic. I’m very independent and always have been. As a matter of fact, I can either order every meal from restaurant or I can also make myself some meals. I also catch my fish, hunt my game. (Which the men OP is referring to don’t do btw) I’m referring to OP’s point of view …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 02:03 AM
-4

But the men who do as you’re saying are probably mediocre in other areas… Js. I don’t think it’s a fixable thing anytime soon.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 01:55 AM
26

Agree with the first sentence 100% But women stopping and “making men live in a world where they have to do it themselves” wouldn’t change anything. The men would just live on PB&J sandwiches and then when it comes time to make a family they’re still babies. Lol And I know this bc I’m a man and my granddad is like this. The man would live on sandwiches when he had no wife. Guy doesn’t even know how to do dishes.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 01:51 AM
1

offended
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/25 02:23 PM
–

Nobody quoted anything. Lol But you assumed I’m uncomfortable with no reason. You seem as intellectually impaired as OP.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/25 02:05 PM
0

“Let’s ignore the top men because I can’t get one and make an argument that makes no sense.”
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/25 12:17 PM
1

Because you act like it (no offense, just trying to help you out) Wanting to get to know someone is good. That’s a perfect start. But unless it’s a woman you see all the time, you’d need to at least ask for her time, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/25 09:13 AM
1

Exactly. Never said you need to be Chris Hemsworth.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/25 09:11 AM
1

Still avoiding his question lololol 😂 sheswrongandsheknowsitLOL
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/25 08:57 AM
1

Lol no I didn’t 😂 Maybe learning to read would be a great start for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/25 08:07 AM
1

You must be really low on the desirability pole. I’m guessing? I mean, natural selection is a thing…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/25 08:03 AM
1

Get some self esteem, love yourself and take care of yourself (gym, productive activities, make good money, etc.) then yes, cold approach.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/25 08:02 AM
1

I never said anything about you getting a yes or how your experience goes. I simply answered your question.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/25 07:52 AM
2

And women are still complaining about them approaching. Nobody said anything about civilized men who are good.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/25 07:50 AM
0

And women are HYPERGAMOUS. They anyway want the top % of dudes. Are you 5? Edit: Always, not anyway
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/25 07:48 AM
1

It’s also a way they can weed out some, too. The weenies/guys who know they are low on the desirability list will listen to them and stop approaching. Real men will still approach anyway. And they know this.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/25 07:43 AM
1

They mean they don’t want creepy or low-status guys approaching them. If Chris Hemsworth or Channing Tatum approached her do you think she would complain?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/25 07:39 AM
-1

Solution: If you want something, go get it. Men who won’t approach a woman they want are asking to be single, not to mention being pu**ies.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/25 05:16 AM
1

Doubt it, but whatever you say Yeah, it’s very woke. The main point, though, is that it’s not backed by facts. Nobody expects academic discipline alone to guide them through life. If anything, some would even say you don’t need academics at all. (Not my view, but some do say that) Yours don’t speak at all. Everything contradicts them. And you tell me to challenge mine? Lol when they’re supported by the science… Again, you’re free to believe what you want. I’ll stick to what’s actually supported …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/25 07:52 AM
1

LOL You clearly know nothing about research. What do you think researchers do? I disagree. Yours doesn’t use a holistic approach with an understanding of the world. You’re only proving my point that it’s just a random woke view that’s not grounded in anything. What tools does yours use, then?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/25 01:07 AM
1

You said using the science and correlation as support for my view was dishonest, and I asked how. What allows me to say that? The STATS. Tell me you’ve read the studies… lol Bro, I literally said CORRELATION. You’re the only one who keeps bringing up causation. It’s not causation, but the correlation has meaning. You don’t like that it has meaning and just want to dismiss it bc you pull the “causation” thing every time. It doesn’t need to be causation in order to mean something. I’m definitely g…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/25 01:51 PM
1

True. Genetics is still just as important is my point there. And since you skipped everything else… lol
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/25 01:30 PM
1

I meant in practical research discussions like this. I already said I wouldn’t choose a partner based on stats. Are you avoiding the real question? Not nearly as many… Those couples are literally outliers, which takes us back to my point that the correlation has meaning. There are many studies showing this, not just one. 2. They’re not intended to assist in choosing a partner. They show my point that promiscuity tends to correlate significantly less with happiness and longevity, though. It sound…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/25 01:24 PM
1

If it was untested, sure. Your lack of research on the topic doesn’t mean it’s not there. Bro, you just argued a whole thing for culture, saying how culture is important and can’t be ignored, yada yada yada. Apples to apples 🍎 Sociology was actually a fave undergrad class of mine. And actually no, a geneticist would tell you that both nature and nurture matter in social aspects of humans. For example, you say you have ASD. Do you realize with de novo variants like SCN2A how genetic autism is? (I…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/25 01:18 PM
1

Right. But you implied that I did. Or if that wasn’t your implication, what was your point in saying it? Btw, I don’t believe stats are ever irrelevant. They always mean something. How is it dishonest? And yeah, I care about stats. Always. Doesn’t mean I have to pick my wife based on stats. I get what you’re calling a fallacy. However, yes, the correlation does have meaning, especially when - like I said - there are so many happy couples who demonstrate it as well and yet women who are promiscuo…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/25 01:10 PM
1

You clearly haven’t read research on PubMed. Saying you have two degrees in STEM and do professional research but yet you don’t even know about sexual differences in monogamy/seed dispersal? LOL Okay And yes, culture is important and cannot be ignored. But when one does research, the facts and objectivity are the focus. Culture practically only comes in when it crosses ethics of the study method, unless you’re literally researching culture, which is not STEM. And if you really were a professiona…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/25 12:57 PM
1

“So the stats were never important in the first place.” You’re the one who said choosing a partner based on stats is ridiculous. (It would be.) Now you’re saying they’re not even important. LOL “my opinion is that this shows a culture and values I don’t agree with and are less healthy than mine.” BINGO. So what you express is not fact but opinion, which as I said before, is your right to have and express freely. The facts come with the research: that my view actually has correlation, yours does …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/25 12:50 PM
1

Actually, it’s on both sides, and my side has proof all over PubMed and in Biology textbooks. Lol Sounds like the burden is on your side, since you avoided it. Again, I never said women don’t enjoy sex or aren’t sexual creatures. That’s stupid. I said they’re more likely to be monogamous than men. Hypergamy itself is a great show of this: higher standards for something you want a long time with (esp when you have to carry something in your body for 9 whole months) vs. men’s general much lower st…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/25 08:05 AM
1

That’s your opinion or interpretation. I definitely make it a standard, as others who hold it do as well - both men and women. So they say. Not saying correlation is causation (It’s not and I never said it was.), but the relationship is still there for a reason. Mmm… I call it self respect. The statistics just back me up. I started choosing a partner before I ever knew about stats. The research disagrees with you, and so do others who hold my same view. For example, my grandparents hold this bel…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/25 07:58 AM
1

Prove it. I’m open to reading any research or proof you show me. And I never said women aren’t sexual creatures. I said they’re less as polygamous as men by nature.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/25 07:48 AM
0

It is the adjective for the noun definition you just posted. She mentioned the adjective, not the noun. Yes, the dictionary’s definition is on point and by far not “unrelated.” Lol (maybe unliked by you?) The correlation is still there, too. One who has many sexual partners is more indiscriminate. One who has few partners (not promiscuous) uses more judgment. Edit: Spelling from bad autocorrect
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/25 07:42 AM
1

Having higher standards doesn’t make someone insecure. To answer your question of why, just look at all the research that shows that promiscuous women are more likely to do infidelity and the marriages don’t last as long and both partners aren’t as happy. If you’re happy like that that’s great. It just means your standards are lower. I like my high standards and like a woman who expects highly as well. We are more likely to be happier and stay together longer.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/25 07:37 AM
1

Because it’s natural for males of reproductive ability to desire many diverse sexual encounters, and it’s natural for females of reproductive ability to want a male to stay with the family unit. It’s called nature. Lol Look at all animal species or do some research.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/25 07:33 AM
1

23
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/25 04:57 AM
3

Having a low n-count wife (or one of 0) is one of the best things in the world. She’s absolutely perfect.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/25 04:02 AM
1

Except it doesn’t apply to the situation… lol
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/25 03:58 AM
1

Imagine that the person you love has such amazing judgment and moral skills that she waited for you and you can get as loving or freaky with her as you want. She’s perfect.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/25 03:56 AM
1

I married a virgin. The only person who has ever pounded her is me. Best life ever. No regrets. Wouldn’t want any other mother for my 1-month-old son. She’s the greatest. And THAT’S the kind of woman all men should be looking for, esp since it’s so rare.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/25 03:54 AM
1

No, they’re not. LOL I guess you can’t read.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/25 03:51 AM
1

You’re the only one who mentioned causation lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/25 03:29 AM
1

Correct. Nobody here said it was. Your definition isn’t the real definition. Having something to do with something else / “relation” is not causation, it’s correlation.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/25 03:27 AM
1

It’s different from yours in that you’ve claimed it means “having higher than average short term relationships” and that impulsivity doesn’t have anything to do with it. I’m proving you wrong. And yes it can, and they go through a “hoe phase”. So yes, impulsivity/lack of control has to do with promiscuity.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/25 01:35 AM
1

Actually, Webster defines promiscuity as “miscellaneous mingling or selection of persons or things : INDISCRIMINATENESS” in its second of two listed definitions. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/promiscuity Less judgment, or as Webster says it, indiscriminateness, is a result of impulsivity/lack of control. So yes, there is a correlation between impulsivity/lack of control and promiscuity. And btw, this can even be seen in a lot of women. Get to know one who just got dumped by a man sh…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/25 12:58 AM
1

“Genetics determines everything.” In what life? None. Even mental conditions including ASD, ADHD, schizophrenia, etc. have an environmental factor at play. Genetics NEVER determine everything. Take a bio class.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/25 12:47 AM
1

LOL Tell me you don’t know brain science at all without telling me you’re clueless asf in brain science. Girls do mature faster than men. It’s a biological fact. Do I need to explain the neurology and neurodevelopment? Nah, you can research it. This topic isn’t even gender bias; it’s scientific fact. Just 😂😂😂
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/25 07:55 AM
3

How do I sound like a child? I even just pointed out something you said and you admitted you can’t prove it lmao Wait… You’re talking about yourself there! YOU were making outlandish claims and trying for personal attacks. And now I’ve shut you down and you’re mad, trying to insult me but can’t. Real scientists take evidence and shut down false claims. That’s my job. Clearly I’m good at it. 😂 Since you took a tangent just to try to insult me (to no avail) and couldn’t stay on topic because I shu…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/25 08:31 PM
1

You can’t. LOL Anybody who reads this can see how wrong you are. Especially those who have lives outside of Reddit. My point here was just that you were wanting refusal to mean inability, and it doesn’t. Sucks for you. Your tangent that you can’t even prove - hoping I’m a fake or fraud - only helped me out. Good day. Stay mad 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/25 08:25 PM
3

Most scientists are doctors with 6-figure incomes. You make it sound like I’m 3 different people. Lol The real issue is you like to think that refusal is the same as inability. In no world is it. Just because a man can do something doesn’t mean he will or that he even should. Get over it.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/25 08:21 PM
2

Prove it then. I’ll wait and watch. Because no, you did the same to the other user. Your problem is you want to think that refusal is inability. It’s not.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/25 08:18 PM
1

No because I didn’t create the kid
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/25 08:14 PM
2

You wish I wasn’t. But you don’t know me.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/25 08:13 PM
3

Irresponsible? I make 6 figures a year and have a 1-month old son and a wife whom I take care of. What planet is your mind on? 😂😂😂 You think because a man doesn’t suck up to you that he’s irresponsible? LOL
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/25 08:12 PM
0

I’m pointing out that you were doing exactly what you were accusing him of.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/25 08:11 PM
1

You asked why the widows get a pass. No, the issues are not the same, and he explained. 2. In this case yes it is because you view both as wrong. That’s comparable. And it could be any other deed you consider wrong as well. The point is he’s justifying his standard, not demoralizing anyone. What people do is their choice, but that doesn’t mean we have to suffer with them.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/25 11:24 AM
0

But you suggesting him mind his business is exactly the same thing lmaooooo If you can give advice, so can he.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/25 11:13 AM
1

For me it’s not even a money issue. I make plenty of money and could take on four or five kids immediately, even with me being the only one working. I’m just not going to raise another man’s kid.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/25 11:12 AM
3

Then where is the child’s dad? Apparently lazy was wanted bc she spread those legs for it. Lol And he’s not being lazy. He’s purposely choosing not to take someone else’s kid, but he will take top-tier responsibility of his own. Huge difference lol
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/25 11:00 AM
2

YOU want it to be his/men’s deficiencies. But it’s not. I’m a doctor, about to start my own practice, make six figures a year, considered an 8 or 9 out of 10 in terms of looks my whole life (have been called a 7 once lol), age 29, work out, take pride in providing, love my lady and my baby son with all my heart and wouldn’t put anything over them. And I promise you, I would not have ever been interested in a single mom. That’s not my problem; it would be the woman’s. Lol That’s what he’s saying …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/25 10:53 AM
2

He explained why the widows are the exception. He didn’t demoralize anyone. He explained why he has the standard he has, which is good on his part. It’s like if a woman made a post saying why she wouldn’t date a child molester. All in all, just stating he wants someone who makes better decisions.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/25 10:33 AM
5

No, it really would be much more beneficial to improve income and make yourself look better. “If a guy could have fixed his looks, he would’ve already done it. If he could have gotten rich, he could’ve already been pursuing that.” This is where he fails. He would NOT have already done it, but nothing is stopping him from starting. He would rather whine than fix the problem. So no wonder he can’t get women. What those whiny guys are missing is the fact that he should focus on himself for himself,…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/25 10:23 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter