TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Expert_Profession951 Archive

View 1 post and 193 comments by Expert_Profession951 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
–

In nature, the best of the most adaptable and best traits survive and get opportunities to pass on their genes. If you aren’t in that group, complaining about it definitely isn’t going to help you. Lol It’ll only make it worse tbh bc now more women can see your desperation. Keep throwing yourself under the bus.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/26 12:27 AM
2

Love to see the coping here! Keep it up
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/25 03:15 AM
2

Love to see the coping here!
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/25 03:15 AM
2

Looking in a mirror there? I don’t argue over opinions. Get a life.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/25 02:51 AM
1

Opinions are like buttholes… Take care and happy holidays lol
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/25 02:46 AM
1

One can’t be a hypocrite if the standards/expectations are not the same. Women don’t usually want virgin men. Do you expect the same from your partner as you give yourself? No, you don’t. No one heterosexual does. Lol I’ll happily run her through ‘til the day we die. I’m dedicated to her and she’s dedicated to me. As a matter of fact, she’s so loyal and wise that if I showed her this thread she’d probably laugh at your comments. Lol I love her
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/25 09:30 PM
0

Yes, I know it correlates with her being a virgin. That was a standard I had for a wife someday: I wouldn’t marry a non-virgin. I don’t like promiscuity and don’t want it in the mother of and example for my future daughter. I had high expectations: a woman who respects herself, isn’t insecure, and only wants sex with the person she loves and plans to stay with, wants sex with me bc she’s crazy about me, not bc she just wants validation from a person with a dick. I’m glad I kept my high standard.…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/25 09:20 PM
-2

It’s funny that you make it sound like a crazy fantasy or something but yet it really happens. I married a woman who was a virgin before me. Get best sex ever multiples times a day!
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/25 07:53 PM
2

Lmao. So you’re both miserable and into having sex with dogs… Disgusting 🤮 And nah, multiple users here have called you out as a troll. You’re the one with the problems, not us. And it shows. I don’t think any of these guys would blame men for not committing to you. I sure don’t.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/25 08:17 PM
4

It’s really funny that the very things they sought to abolish are the things they still want and crave, isn’t it? Feminism = Foolishism is my new line for this lol
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/25 04:34 PM
6

Posts like this are funny because women cannot help but sabotage themselves. Okay, glad I’m not the only one laughing at all this. I’ve been laughing - almost crying from it - for twenty minutes. I’m even screenshotting all this and gonna post elsewhere.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/25 04:24 PM
3

This. They’re already screwed. (Literally) 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/25 04:17 PM
2

I’m guessing she used to live in hell, and there’s a lot of women down there. That’s why the women here look like angels to her. (It’s a joke lmao) But yes, she’s delusional. There are very few women anymore who actually are similar to angels. Most women, on the other hand, have the same problems she’s having. And if that’s angelic then I don’t even wanna go to heaven lol
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/25 04:11 PM
7

Truth in a nutshell ^ ☝🏻
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/25 04:04 PM
4

I love how you’re pointing out WOMEN’S flaw here (having bad judgment) yet want to continue to blame men. we have to demand these things when women shouldn’t even have to be asking in first place That’s some extreme self-entitlement! Good thing you’re waking up to reality. Was this meant to be funny? You call men broken pieces of sht but you complain about how you fck with them and they’re smart enough not to commit. I mean… 😅You’ve given me the laugh for the day.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/25 03:50 PM
4

And they’re surprised that when they so easily give themselves away to these men they still don’t commit to them. It’s so laughable.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/25 03:08 PM
4

You’re just now figuring this out? You’re telling women to change and do the right thing, yet at the end you make it sound like men are the ones who’ve been in the wrong. “… just for men to do the right thing.” Lol Summary: Why buy the cow when the milk is free? Yes, if access to the milk (sex) is restricted, men will want to buy the cow (marry the woman, be committed to her, etc.). If access is free to everyone, why worry about committing? Despite what people claim on Reddit, in the real world …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/25 03:04 PM
1

Dictionaries post the most commonly used or the most convenient definitions given by people. That’s why they have to be updated. Language is subjective. People use dictionaries to try to prevent ambiguity. If that wasn’t the case, what purpose would they serve at all? He didn’t specify that it hasn’t been defined by a certain person or group. He just said it hasn’t been defined. I showed that it has. You’re putting words in his mouth. If the people debating it don’t use the definition and want t…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/25 04:12 AM
1

You can’t track what doesn’t already exist. So the meaning had to exist in order to be put in the dictionary. Define means “give meaning to.” According to you or the dictionary? If you, then your argument is subjective and you’re wasting time. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/define The dictionary actually says it can be either: to define could be to “determine or identify” or “to discover and set forth” the meaning of. Argue with the dictionary.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/25 02:42 AM
–

Just as you did! 😂 Yes, you gave a whole lot of text with ZERO links. See how stupid it makes you look? It’s even worse when there’s a whole internet out there for reading that supports their side but not yours at all! :) And you mean minus the one they gave you that you didn’t like? 🤔
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/25 05:49 PM
–

They pointed you to one. There’s proof, you just don’t like it. I think you’re the one in fantasy. It’s kind of obvious lol There is a lot on this in social science research, especially with topics like 1. hoe phases (women handling some kind of insecurity by being promiscuous for a certain time). 2. the fact that majority of men still prefer virgins. 3. the study on promiscuity and lack of loyalty, which you like to say is due to promiscuous people being “born as cheaters” (lol) while you can’t…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/25 04:27 PM
–

Male sluts commit to women with less N though, or even virgins, simply because the man is desirable so he has good pick of the crop. HVM usually don’t commit to sluts at all; we just use them for fuckbuddies until we find a wife later. Which 1. Stabs women’s beloved claim that it’s due to men’s insecurity in the neck 2. Is, as other users have mentioned, pretty well supported by psychological research, since female sluts tend to have problems
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/25 03:42 PM
–

Yeah, those aren’t abusive. And like you said, they do reward those. If they really wanted to stop it they would stop making stupid decisions and rewarding it. Seems I just got the wrong idea at first when you said abusive.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/25 01:58 AM
–

Yeah, I agree. When you said “abusive” I was thinking rape, serious behaviors, etc. Stuff you’d go to prison or see a psychologist for. The stuff you’re calling abusive here I don’t agree is abusive, and partly because like you said, women actually like it and reward it - even though their own actions to it disadvantage them. They bring about their own problem in that.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/25 01:20 AM
–

Wish I could put this on the front of a newspaper. You’ve pointed out a serious flaw with the incel men here: they think bad of their competition due to insecurity. Not that the competition is actually bad, just that they’re not man enough to compete and can’t stand it so they have to make an excuse.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/25 10:40 PM
–

True. The difference is that saying no isn’t wrong, but being abusive is.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/25 10:38 PM
–

These behaviors are never justified, but not just for men - for women, too. Your post should be to everyone and have no gender bias bc both are guilty and like to blame everyone else for their own problems. “…struggling with very real constraints like shared custody and financial dependency, physical abuse and controlling dynamics.” Don’t forget that women put themselves in that position like 99% of the time. (The only exception is by rape, so I’ll leave off 1%.)
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/25 10:36 PM
1

I agree with that. ALL sides should require proof, but our system has gone from “innocent until proven guilty” to “let’s just assume the more favorable scenario.” And I already answered that. He could have some kind of anxiety or social problem the girl doesn’t have.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/25 07:02 PM
1

I addressed it. The fact that they “live in a society that is entirely built, maintained, progressed, and defended by men… enjoying all of the modern day comforts…” (your words), against the will of men even (as you acknowledged, “at the expense of men”), shows their control. You can try to dismiss this by saying it’s in men in the government, as you did, but there are a lot of women in the government making very powerful decisions, and it wasn’t always like this: once upon a time women had zero…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/25 06:53 PM
1

Eh, I don’t think our philosophical perspectives on this are reconcilable. Seems like we both acknowledge history and how it went down but we interpret it differently. For example, I don’t see how you see freedom and security as the same. They literally cannot even coexist. The more security you implement in a society, the less free it is. And Vice versa: you can’t have complete freedom with security in place and lines drawn. Not saying your interpretation is wrong. Just saying I don’t share the…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/25 03:26 AM
4

Did you not read the OP? Referring to history when men ran the system, raped women when they wanted to, etc. … And your question is exactly what I pointed out to you. Somehow men have lost the power, and women didn’t have to shoot or nuke them to obtain it. Hmmmm… “Women aren’t dominating anything. Just the thought alone is laughable.” But you just admitted that men have lost control and women are taking advantage of their work. Lol I’m a man. Lol But I disagree that freedom for anyone - men or …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/25 09:28 PM
2

As a man, I think women would survive alone better than men would. Women would probably band together and help each other. Men fight and kill each other (of their own species), wars, etc. Without women the men would probably kill each other/themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/25 08:58 PM
8

“They just live in a system that is rigged in their favor at the expense of men…” Given that system started out controlled by men at the expense of women, apparently the women have outcompeted the men. Or what do you say, that the men just gave it to them and now complain about it? Lol And the women didn’t even have to fight the men for the control to change hands.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/25 08:50 PM
8

“2. Men are more violent, yes” If a woman had said that on this sub, you’d be going haywire. “That’s misandrist!” I’m tempted to publish this in a newspaper or something. Funny how y’all can’t stand for women to say it but you’ll openly admit it in another thread. I hope the women see this.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/25 08:44 PM
3

Can you prove that he was treated worse just for being a boy? Not saying it’s impossible, but you can’t just assume something without knowing more information about the other variables. That’s with anything. Actually, I don’t side with the women on here at all. So much of their shit they bring on themselves but don’t want to be held accountable. But I DO side with the facts and a logical approach.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/25 01:37 AM
5

Looks and same family in childhood (a few environmental factors) aren’t the only factors that contribute to how a person is treated. It can have a lot to do with it. He may have a mental/social disorder like ASD that she doesn’t have. And no, I didn’t say anything about hating the guy. I’m just pointing out that you made some assumptions without controlling for other possible variables. You gotta love how someone who makes a post with so many wrong assumptions and flaws in basic biology would tr…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/25 01:03 AM
–

I wouldn’t. And actually I would think more highly of her if she dumped me (or whoever lied to her) and moved on. Shows her self-respect.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/25 09:46 PM
6

Honesty is honesty. The topic about which someone is lying doesn’t make a difference; they’re still not honest.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/25 09:13 PM
9

Your assertions that they are so similar due to them being twins is retarded. They’re fraternal twins, so 2 different eggs and 2 different sperm. It’s no different than if the same mom and dad had had them a year apart. Same parents does not by any means mean same genetics. Also, if he’s not social and doesn’t talk to women then what does he expect?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/25 09:09 PM
9

They want honesty from women in these things? I see them on here saying that they willingly lie to women all the time to get sex, and they condone this lying and try to justify it. What hypocrisy. Okay, glad I’m not red pill. I’ve learned something new today.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/25 09:02 PM
–

Both are at fault. There are literally tests for STDs. You go in the hospital and they take like 5 minutes once the sample goes to the lab. A person can also be more responsible and decrease the chance of getting it by using a condom or knowing their partner better. And I agree with that. In your example both people made shitty decisions. Same as in the OP. My only addition would be don’t complain about the consequences you bring on yourself by making stupid decisions, and you’re not entitled to…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/25 08:15 PM
–

And in reality, both genders lie and are dishonest to an extent, and such conditions without a written contract and proof of breach don’t hold up by law, so they can complain all they want but the only thing that would change it in their favor is for them to make better decisions. Yep, that’s the reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/25 08:01 PM
5

It’s amazing how many will ask the fish how to catch one instead of asking the pro fisherman…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/25 06:20 PM
1

Yep. Pill checks out.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/25 06:19 PM
1

Thanks to my independent happiness of life and not needing verification of women, I have a lot of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/25 08:06 PM
2

I’ve been going to the gym since I was 13, whether I had a gf or not. And I make six figs a year, again independent of what women think or say I like my job. And I’m usually rated a 9, on average. Could do the same as a 2. So go figure. I think you just don’t want to accept that confidence is independent of what others think bc you can’t imagine being happy without needing approval of women.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/25 06:48 PM
1

This is true and a great way to distinguish confidence and arrogance.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/25 06:44 PM
1

As I said, the men are pathetic. I’m a man and I like sex, but I’ve never been desperate enough to simp for average women on a dating app. Tbh, I’m starting to think it’s not what we do that makes us HVM look good; it’s how lame the average dudes are that makes us look good.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/25 03:21 PM
1

If they’re getting >30 potential suitors a day compared to the men not getting even a third of that, either they are bombshells or the men are pathetic. Or both lol
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/25 03:01 PM
0

That’s probably why they get ghosted and run into the problems OP mentioned.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/25 02:59 PM
3

That’s ridiculous. I work with women who have only focused on their careers, are still in their late 20s or early 30s, and make almost half a million a year, so more than most guys do. And they have no intention of getting married. Nothing is stopping women from having the careers they want. And they’re not pushing to get married like you’re claiming, at least not in the U.S. The only luxury men have that women don’t have is we are seen as better when we have more sexual partners and having a di…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/25 02:55 PM
2

Yeah because I’d find ways to be happy and I’d be productive, like go to gym and make good money, which would raise it. My happiness and enjoyment of life is not dependent on anything other people think.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/25 02:20 PM
1

“… somehow garnered the confidence to behave as though he is more desirable than he actually is.” There’s the problem. That’s arrogance, not confidence. He’s insecurely using it to cover up a flaw. It’s not something he backs up. I was suggesting he should be confident about something he can actually be confident about (is backed up, shows in his life). That would be attractive to the women. And I disagree with your philosophy that others dictate our reality. Looks like a lot of you guys just wa…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 09:26 PM
1

But does he have reason to be confident about what he’s acting confident about? Everybody has something they can be confident about. If he has a reason to be confident about it then where’s the issue? And if you govern your behavior on opinions of people that you acknowledge aren’t even correct, then that’s a problem on its own. Just your problem, not theirs.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 08:28 PM
0

How long do those women stay with you? Not long at all. And who could blame them? Most guys - or people in general - can’t fake something for a long or significant amount of time. Tbh that’s not news to me. I’m almost 30 and had a great dating life before I got married. (I had my first real gf and sex when I was only 12. You do the math.) Faking won’t hold down what you want rn; you’ll just have something to complain about later. It’s more like “Fake it til you make it,” and when you make it (if…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 08:01 PM
2

That any confidence is attractive
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 04:37 PM
2

There are hot guys who still have problems getting women bc they’re insecure (usually has childhood problems). For example, a hot guy whose dad molested him a lot. And there are average guys who do better than other average guys just because they feel good about themselves and it’s obvious to people around them. I’m not saying that being hot isn’t the #1 factor. I’m saying that confidence is still attractive whether you’re hot or not.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 04:30 PM
2

Lol so you think trying to put on a show just in the moment is what women want? You think they don’t get to know who the guy is and the difference between who he is vs. what he’s doing just to try to impress her? Keep thinking that. No wonder you can’t get women.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 04:15 PM
1

I think you should read on the Munchausen Trilemma. Lol I never said my logic wasn’t flawed. I said all logic is flawed, as the Trilemma demonstrates, and that mine wasn’t circular as he was claiming. Yeah, maybe he will see your comments and learn from it.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 03:33 PM
1

Thank you for confirming my point. And the purpose of the Trilemma is to demonstrate that all logical methods are flawed and never lead to an objective truth. You know that if you’ve studied math.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 03:30 PM
0

If you’re saying all unattractive people have absolutely nothing to be confident in, I strongly disagree. They have something they can be confident in and it not be delusional. If not, they’re not even trying.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 03:19 PM
0

Not disagreeing that a lot of this is based on perception, but I won’t say all. What the person is confident or arrogant about needs to be backed up for it to be confidence. So, an unattractive person with an IQ of 168 can be confident in his academic abilities. That would be attractive in itself. No arrogance there. (Given he doesn’t go around flaunting it, I’m saying if he really is confident in it because he can be) If a physically unattractive obese 300 lb. person brags about how good-lookin…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 03:17 PM
2

Definitely. But just because you find yourself attractive doesn’t mean others will. There’s an extremely subjective component.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 03:10 PM
-4

Both are true: unattractiveness is itself unattractive, and insecurity is unattractive. So if you’re unattractive, why not at least give yourself something to be confident about to give yourself a few good points?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 03:06 PM
2

It is. Do you even know what logic is? You clearly didn’t read the links and don’t know basics of logic. If you could do that, you’d make millions. Present your breaking of the famous Trilemma to a philosophy professor. You’d get rich if you’re right. But you’re not.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 02:59 PM
2

1 Your grammar and sentence structure are horrible, so I don’t even understand your question. I’ve said everything very easily and simply. What part don’t you understand? Or is my genius too much for you? Just repeating something or not comprehending basics doesn’t look better than not using logic, jsyk. You’re a good example of the flaws OP is talking about.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 02:54 PM
2

Because for most people who have no options, a reason exists behind it. Examples: obesity, being short, lack of social skills, being poor/not able to financially support themselves, differences in moral values, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 02:39 PM
3

Actually, no it’s not. I’m not using premises as the conclusion or Vice versa; I’m saying your interpretation of the correlation between no options and inability to be a good partner is wrong. https://www.logicallyfallacious.com/logicalfallacies/Circular-Reasoning But thanks so much for the compliment! Circular logic is still logic, and ALL logic is flawed, as is shown in the Munchausen Trilemma. So whatever logic you’d prefer a person to use or you call yourself using would be just as flawed. h…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 02:30 PM
4

I agree with OP. There is PLENTY of flaw in the logic on this sub. Too much. And OP did a great job of pointing a small part of it out. And I disagree that intentions don’t matter. But that’s a separate topic.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 02:24 PM
2

I stopped you that fast? Lol I’m reversing your last implication to say that he probably has no options because of something he lacks, not the other way around, which is what you tried to imply.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 02:19 PM
-4

So what is Eugene confident in? What are some positives to how he spends his time, apart from approaching women?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 02:15 PM
1

There’s probably a reason he doesn’t have options.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 02:13 PM
-4

I very rarely agree with the women on this sub, but this is spot on.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 01:54 PM
2

What is the unattractive guy in your hypothetical example confident in? If he can’t back it up, it’s not confidence. Same would go for anybody. So maybe he should be confident in something he can back up. And you mean women want attractive men? Wait, so they’re normal human beings? Just like men who want attractive women? Oh no, how could they…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 01:49 PM
8

The difference between confidence and arrogance isn’t in what we think of the person. An ugly person can be confident, and an attractive or extremely talented person can be arrogant. And confidence has been defined. Look it up.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 01:44 PM
4

“not whether you feel secure in yourself.” Lol that’s what confidence is. “One’s attractiveness is 100% up to the opinion of others.” Yes, but his confidence is not; it’s only up to him. And confidence can make a person more attractive to others.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 01:37 PM
2

A few things you’re missing (along with a lot of the guys on here): Confidence always needs to be backed up by performance, and it’s usually without any effort; it doesn’t need all the “talk.” Telling people you’re something is unattractive (duh); instead just be that person already. No need to talk or put on a show. For example, if a man is truly confident in being attractive, he doesn’t go around telling women he thinks he’s attractive or trying to put on a show for her. It will naturally foll…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 01:26 PM
1

I’m surprised the men on here missed this. Both are true. These guys seem to think that being confident means pretending to be something you’re not. No, that’s delusion. Being confident means being happy with who you are, even if you’re a 2 - be happy being a 2. Both your points are true.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 01:12 PM
1

Lol You literally just came onto a post from over a whole month ago just to try to get at me. Unfortunately for you, I have a life outside of Reddit, no care or concern in the world about your opinions, and a low tolerance for stupidity. blocked
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 03:47 AM
1

Asking questions that clearly go against the points in the post doesn’t show understanding.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 03:43 AM
1

https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/opinion You’re dumb as hell. That’s my opinion. We’re even.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 03:41 AM
1

But not understood. Got it.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 03:11 AM
1

Opinions are like buttholes…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 03:10 AM
1

The words of someone who didn’t read the post…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 03:09 AM
1

You’re offended? Not my problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 03:07 AM
1

Yeah, I agree that it’s not the negative experience people say it is if you have a secure partner. It makes such a huge difference to be with someone who’s confident and secure in themselves. I only dated an avoidant once. I got out of there so fast, and the crazy thing is that until they actually reflect they don’t even realize that they’re bringing the cycle back around on themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/25 01:44 AM
1

Given I didn’t do the same thing you did (trying to call out someone for something I myself am doing), not really.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/25 09:43 PM
1

“… if you need…” Your statement is void right there.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/25 09:42 PM
1

You say I’m struggling. Do you know me? I’m happily married and have a son, btw. So doing literally the same thing you try to call someone out for lmao what a brainless hypocrite
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/25 07:54 PM
0

Like a lot of other users on the internet, it’s a lie to make themselves feel better.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/25 05:00 PM
1

As well as philosophies. I like a woman who’s secure in herself and doesn’t need attention from every Tom, Steve, Harry, Joe, etc. Confidence is attractive in a woman; insecurity is a turn-off to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/25 02:50 PM
4

This is true. You can sell anything that gets to people’s “soft spots” or concerns, and it’s kind of sad. As a doctor I get a lot of questions from my patients when new medications come out. And tbh the medicine would probably hurt more than help. It’s just ways to push stuff and make money. Imagine what it would be like if trying to get along with each other and be as healthy as possible made money.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/25 10:18 PM
5

There are women who know how to love a man but are not sluts. They’re hard to find but well worth the time and effort if you find one. Sluts don’t know how to love. Loving a man and worshipping dick are not the same thing. I prefer a woman who loves me for me, not worships one organ on my body that half the human population have. Not to mention that promiscuity correlates with infidelity dramatically. Your definition of love is weird lol
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/25 07:01 PM
1

The fact that you made a whole new account and came back to reply says everything. I don’t block random people on Reddit, especially ones who block someone bc they can’t prove their own argument. Lol Grow some balls. And maybe fix that hole in your argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/25 09:07 PM
1

@MarioWilson122 LOL Blocking me right after you post is just a show that you can’t win and have no balls. Thanks for indirectly telling me I’m right lol
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/25 08:15 PM
1

Yeah, but giving it up to him quickly - afterward he will still leave. I didn’t disagree with you there. That’s where, again, she needs to be wiser because she hasn’t lost anything in him as he wasn’t dedicated to her anyway; she lost in SMV though. And no, you’re not defiantly right about that. Nobody should wait “forever,” but if the woman wants something long-term and serious, giving it up fast will get her the opposite of that either way: either alone since the HVM leaves, or she ends up wit…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/25 07:36 PM
2

I disagree with the first statement. As a HVM, one thing we look for in a woman is modesty and not giving herself to everyone. So if he has decided to leave her for the reason you mentioned, he wasn’t looking for something long-term anyway and she doesn’t lose anything when he leaves. The lying about body count is one thing that traps them. I think you know this, as a fellow man. When having sex with a woman, usually even before the fucking, you can tell if she’s been around. She can lie, but yo…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/25 06:45 PM
2

This is where women screw themselves up. They could avoid this problem altogether if they made men wait. And then, of course, if she doesn’t make him wait, she’s probably not long-term material for a valuable man anyway so she gets left or ends up with a low-value man like you mentioned.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/25 06:24 PM
3

If you’re looking for a long-term serious experience, this OP is why it’s wise to make sure the person wants to be in a fully committed relationship with you for the right reasons BEFORE you have sex. If you want something serious but give sex too quickly… well… why buy the cow when the milk is free? My wife wouldn’t fuck with anybody until she and I were together, partially for this reason that OP expresses: she refused to be used. Of course she had bazillions of opportunities and expressed sui…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/25 06:21 PM
5

“Romance isn’t just about sexual attraction, it’s basically just where “thoughtfulness” meets “narrative”.” TAKE NOTES BOYS ☝🏻
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/25 10:29 AM
4

Supply and demand. That’s why they call dating a market. So like he said, it’s all about what you bring to the table. If all you can bring is money, you can expect to be used for that. And based on your Calvin Klein model comment, I’m guessing you’re not exactly far above ugly yourself bc it sounds like you’re projecting.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/25 09:32 AM
2

He’s right. He’s talking about putting effort into relationships and the other person, not things for yourself that are also beneficial outside a relationship. You said he thought those things don’t help, but nowhere did he say that. He said the opposite. You have the reading comprehension problems of a blind bat and are projecting it onto other users. Got it. And if you’re waiting on me to say we were wrong, you’re wasting your time.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/25 03:59 PM
2

Actually, He’s right. And the only reason you would feel led to bring up religion or some kind of philosophical view on sex. Lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/25 03:49 PM
3

He didn’t say those things don’t help. (Can you not read and so you project your uneducated stance onto others?) He’s pointing out that you mentioned ONLY those things and failed to include other things that matter. I’m jacked because I go to the gym daily and am considered an attractive guy. And I make a good 6-figure annual salary. But if I never spent time with my wife or showed that I care about her feelings neither my muscles nor my bank account would matter and she would leave. Rightfully …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/25 03:45 PM
–

The instinct is still there. Changing a societal issue doesn’t rewire a genetic code.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/25 05:32 PM
1

Everything is subjective. Even things we consider like math - still subjective due to necessity of observation, which comes with limited perspective. Are you familiar with the Munchausen Trilemma? I already went over the reason I wouldn’t marry a woman like you mentioned. If you didn’t read it, that’s on you. I also specify why promiscuous is a lot worse than someone who’s discriminate but a non-virgin. If you chose not to focus on that and only on my reason for choosing to marry a virgin, again…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/25 05:15 PM
1

It does matter to me. How do you conclude that it doesn’t? Correct. But the first definition does not specify a certain number as the line to be crossed, making it subjective. I interpret definitions fine. You need to learn to interpret EVERYTHING you read because you’ve made several mistakes here just in this conversation.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/25 04:15 PM
2

Oh wow, now you’re saying I said the OPPOSITE of what I even said. Bro, I said it DOES negatively affect the ability to pair bond, and women started jumping down my throat. If you’ve seen the research that says it does, then you’re agreeing with me and you were dumb enough not to even know it 😂You just made a mistake in assuming I can’t pair bond or that I was promiscuous. But ngl, now I’m a bit worried bc a dude who can’t comprehend and makes dumb assumptions agreed with me. If it wasn’t based …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/25 08:07 AM
1

I’m a neurobiologist lol An uneducated Reddit user isn’t gonna teach me about the brain
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/25 07:56 AM
0

You didn’t read the part about the 1 minute or 6 years, or either you didn’t understand it. Let me break it down. Me not wanting to marry a woman with a count at all does not mean she is promiscuous. It says a lot about my preference; it doesn’t say that she is necessarily promiscuous. However, it does emphasize that I would not be with a promiscuous woman. Technically, whatever her N count, whether she is promiscuous or not would depend on whether she was indiscriminate. For example, in the 6 y…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/25 07:50 AM
1

I’m not emotionally damaged.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/25 07:37 AM
1

She was a virgin when we fucked the first time. We married later.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/25 01:00 AM
2

Nope. She wouldn’t have married me if she was missing out. She’s too smart for that.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/25 12:59 AM
2

I never said it was =. You’re making assumptions. Neither my wife nor I was promiscuous. I don’t think we will have a problem maintaining what we have long-term.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/25 12:57 AM
2

Oh, you can’t show where I said sex is bad and you made that up? That’s what I thought. It’s not just that you had sex. I have sex multiple times every day with my wife. The act of sex makes the world go around. It’s a beautiful part of nature. I have a two-month-old son. I’m not condemning sex. Lol What distinguishes your decision as promiscuity is the indiscriminateness (literally the definition in Webster dictionary : https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/promiscuity ). As with anything …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/25 05:59 PM
3

When did I say sex was bad? Show me. I said promiscuity is bad, and the evidence is in the research. Nah. I love my wife for the woman she is, and part of who she is is that she’s a very good decision maker and extremely passionate but wise and secure in herself. Yes, if you change anything about her she would not be the same person and I wouldn’t love her the same. Because I love her just the way she is. You could use any other of her traits, too. Example: She’s a nurse and is very caring. If s…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/25 05:49 PM
3

I love my wife more than anything in this world. No idea where your last part came from. Yeah, what I said is true and is all in research. Promiscuity and insecurity or even infidelity aren’t exactly strangers. Lol As a scientist, research is the proof.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/25 05:27 PM
3

I guess I’m an outlier on this bc my view doesn’t seem to be represented in the comments. So I’ll express: “Waiting” , making me wait, etc. has never been a concern for me. I would definitely prefer a modest woman who makes me - and everyone - wait then marries me (as she’s a virgin, made all wait) over one who fucks me fast but fucks with everyone. The first one I could marry; the second one I wouldn’t even date. I like modesty. I like the ability to teach my wife everything, be the one she run…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/25 05:21 PM
3

So promiscuous/bad judgment then. Doing something to feel good in the moment versus making a better decision that’ll have better consequences down the road. (Promiscuous women tend to have low self esteem and be insecure, with motivations in seeking validation and like I said making bad judgment for in the moment. To answer your question) And I’m married already. My wife enjoys sex with me and we have a fantastic sex life. Would I want her if she was promiscuous? Hell no.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/25 05:02 PM
1

Nah, loose ones suck. Tight is best 👌🏼 Especially if she’s new to it and you get to teach her through it …. Mmmmmmm
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/25 04:51 PM
6

If she doesn’t like the guy why have sex so fast? Talk about insecurity and low self-esteem. Glad I kept my standards high. I def would not want something like that in a wife. Eew.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/25 04:50 PM
2

This. His reason for courting her makes all the difference. If he’s just in it for sex he won’t care about your body count. If he wants something long-term or a good relationship or a wife, of course the standards are higher.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/25 04:47 PM
0

Nah, if a woman brought the case in then there would be consequences. They don’t because they don’t feel violated when it’s another woman doing it, unless they already have some reason to fear said woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/25 04:03 PM
0

I still don’t think much would change. Women don’t feel as violated when it’s another woman. If they did, they could take her to court the same way they do men. But they don’t.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/25 03:50 PM
2

Lol That’s like asking what’s 2+2. 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/25 03:24 PM
3

If it’s consented to (as most women are when it’s their female friends doing these things), it can’t go anywhere. Whoever took it to court would just look like a fool. Get into the courtroom Judge: Did your friend, said perpetrator, do anything out of your will or that you feel violated you? Woman: No. We do that all the time. Case dismissed. Lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/25 03:20 PM
5

Domestic violence is much higher in men than women.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/25 03:17 PM
0

Stupidity and insecurity. No wonder they have problems getting dates.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/25 05:46 AM
3

Okay not “all,” but yeah a lot of them are. Read them.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/25 08:50 PM
3

Read all the other responses on this same post by OP then. Bc they all are saying the same thing I’m saying. If you don’t understand it, oh well. Teaching special ed wasn’t my major. Tbh I could take the time and explain it but you’ll get the same thing by just reading the other responses that are saying the same thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/25 08:41 PM
1

The difference and why I can pretend to have not eaten breakfast but can’t pretend to be a woman: I’ve been without breakfast before (recently btw) and so I know what it feels like. I’ve never lived as a woman. Your logic is super flawed. It’s easy to pretend something you’ve experienced recently or several times. It can be impossible to pretend something you’ve never experienced at all. Wow! You’re taking a complete tangent that has nothing to do with the original topic and have extremely flawe…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/25 05:07 PM
2

Horrible and a little sick/weak What does eating breakfast have to do with the topic at hand? 😂 Waste of time for such tangents. Good day.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/25 04:55 PM
2

Idk, I’m not a good pretender. If I was I probably would’ve been an actor. How about ask a woman?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/25 04:50 PM
2

Come across a random man in the woods. Easy. I carry weapons and have a permit, and I fight well. I can easily defend myself. I don’t think a guy is gonna mess with me anyway unless I mess with him first. (I’m not a woman, so I don’t see why he would.) What does that question have to do with anything? If it’s for comparison, you’re asking the wrong person. I’m not a woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/25 04:46 PM
1

Bc I don’t care anything about the responses. I’m talking about only the original meme and the meaning, intentions, and implications with it. My post here was about the original meme, and you start on about the responses. This is why I said you’re not contributing anything to my post.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/25 02:50 PM
1

Only afterward in defense. The original post wasn’t about bears. It was aimed at men and they could’ve used practically any big fighting animal in the bear’s place. Unless you can prove that it was, you’re wasting time.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/25 02:41 PM
3

Oh, their responses were about bears, yeah. But I said the original meme wasn’t. They probably started talking about bears and those stats just out of defense. I don’t disagree with that. And yes, I still fail to see how this adds to the discussion of what I said. I still don’t believe the original meme was about bears.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/25 02:27 PM
2

I disagree because again, for the third time, the meme isn’t based on the chance of her being attacked by either and you have assumed that it is. No, the meme is based on WHAT could be done by either. The bear would just maul her to death. The man could do a lot of things, including leave her alive and forever traumatized. (Did you not read my other comment?) Perceived danger has multiple aspects, not just one. There’s the perspective of chance of an act, but there’s also the perspective of capa…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/25 02:21 PM
0

I know that, but again, the meme wasn’t based on who is more likely to attack her. So your argument is irrelevant. Most often a predator or criminal will initiate an act when he’s unobserved and won’t when he is observed. If you deny that you’re either a kid who doesn’t know about society or delusional. Nobody said the supposed man is normal; that’s something you added for bias again. Presence of witnesses matters significantly on whether a wrongful act would be committed by the man. Then the qu…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/25 01:57 PM
1

This. OP’s post basically asking how he can improve himself for women… I mean, I didn’t come up with the word “simp,” but his post demonstrates it so well. Lol And he doesn’t even realize that’s not attractive to women bc they want a man who has his head on straight and is good regardless, doesn’t revolve around women.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/25 01:43 PM
5

When you improve yourself for yourself, people will notice and you will be in the right environment with others of the same. If you want to improve just only for women, you’re already dooming yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/25 01:37 PM
2

I was gonna say this. Do it for yourself, OP.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/25 01:35 PM
2

It’s very realistic and has been done many times. Presence of witnesses isn’t moot at all; it can even determine whether he does it or not. Context for sure matters. I understand the point of adding the trail, but it does bias the scenario and the message. And I agree with your last paragraph. It would have been a lot more logical for women to just show how many women have been affected by trauma by men (have experienced it directly or know someone personally who has). I think the reason for the…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/25 01:20 PM
7

I think a man would be more likely to abuse her in the woods, given there’s significantly less observation by others. What makes you think he’d be more likely to do it on a public trail?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/25 01:15 PM
2

I fail to see how this contributes to what I said. Enlighten me if you want. And I don’t believe it’s about bears. Women could have used any other big fighting animal for the same thing. I agree that women aren’t logical at all lol, but the gist of what they’re saying is just that men can be dangerous. In other words, it would have been a lot more logical to just show how many women today either have experienced direct trauma by a man or know a woman who has. But they used the meme to get more a…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/25 01:12 PM
1

No idea. Is there a stat on that? I doubt it.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/25 12:52 PM
2

The original meme doesn’t even say anything about a trail. OP biased it by adding that to it. And the decision by women to prefer the bear isn’t based on the probability of a bad encounter. So how likely she is to encounter the bear or the man is irrelevant
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/25 12:48 PM
6

As a man I agree with this. If women used the metaphor to weed out smart men vs. ones to avoid, they did a good job. Lol
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/25 12:46 PM
4

I disagree. There are less likely to be other observers in the woods vs. on a trail. That’s ideal for something like a murder, rape, or sexual trauma. And no, it doesn’t help both sides or base the argument. It actually leans toward a side and biases it, considering bears are more likely to attack a human in their natural habitat (in the woods) as opposed to on a trail.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/25 12:44 PM
8

Where you’re wrong: Their preference for the bear instead of the man isn’t based on probability of attack/how likely one is to hurt them. You seem to think it is. It’s based on what could be done by each and based on experienced/already observed situations. A bear, at the worst, will just maul the woman to death. A man could do… a lot of things, sometimes even leaving her alive to remember it forever. The original meme doesn’t even mention a trail. It just says in the woods. Makes a huge differe…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/25 12:40 PM
1

Let’s say he is blue collar. Still, he’s an outlier. Most (>98%) of blue collar workers don’t own businesses or even know how to manage one. And most white collar workers probably make more than your husband does. So my point still stands: White collar workers make a hell of a lot more.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 01:11 PM
1

Look up white collar jobs meaning. You’ll see that every definition, no matter which site you go to, includes managerial tasks or project management. Business owners do those things, like you’re talking about managing employees,/helpers, whether it’s one or 10,000. You can be white collar and still do blue collar activities.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 12:58 PM
2

A business owner is still considered white collar. For example, one of my buddies owns a roofing company and he started off doing the work himself in construction (blue collar). When he started his own company he became white collar, even though he helps out sometimes. Like I’m a physician and researcher and I go hunting and fishing sometimes (blue collar), but I’m still considered white collar. Business owners are white collar.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 12:48 PM
3

Yeah. Once they become a business owner they’re white collar.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 12:23 PM
1

Irrelevant. The contrast is the point.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 02:59 AM
3

You said blue collar makes more. I showed otherwise by contrasting the two categories with jobs of the same tier in each. Don’t care whether you could be a surgeon or not And most blue collar people NEVER make what you make - not even half of it, even. White collar makes more.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 02:49 AM
3

Coming from a man Actually, white collar jobs pay more. It all depends on what you do. Conducting a train is top-tier blue collar; the top-tier white collar jobs pay about $200k-$300k a year more than that, on average. (Ex.: surgeons) Idk what your degree is in, but do what you enjoy and don’t worry about what other people think of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 12:48 AM
2

I just answered this. Both are at fault. You presented a truthful HALF of a story. I presented the other half. You’re offended as hell that I said women are just as at fault as the men. Lol Do you even know what a reflex is? My response is well-supported by details and facts. Reflexes are quick responses that usually don’t even make sense bc they’re just defense. How can I be attacked by something I agree with? That makes no sense. You are offended that women are the other half of the fault. Hen…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 12:32 AM
2

I already said those men are shit. What part of “I AGREE” don’t you understand? Im saying those women are shit too, and that’s the part you don’t like. 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 12:25 AM
1

It doesn’t. I literally said I agree with it. You’re the one it seems to bother when someone points out the two-sided truth and that women are just as much at fault.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 12:19 AM
2

Lol I didn’t target you. I don’t expect you to do shit. I just pointed out the flaw in your argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 12:18 AM
1

Bc your post points out where men are wrong on this topic, which is true. It just leaves out the other half of the story, which is how women are just as wrong. Is it that hard to comprehend? How about both genders take responsibility for themselves and stop blaming and projecting all their issues onto the other? But you don’t want to look in the mirror…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 12:10 AM
1

As a man I agree with everything you said. But you leave out that the woman is just as much at fault. Except for rape cases (a minority), it takes two to tango. Yeah, the guy isn’t gonna tell you he’s a deadbeat, but why not make sure first before fucking just bc it’s possible? Both are at fault. Both should take accountability and responsibility. Edit: Just to add… Every single mother I’ve met made horrible decisions. There may be some exceptions and of course this is just my biased perspective…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 12:00 AM
2

You ignore that when men bail when they find out she’s pregnant the law can’t hold him responsible because then he’s not there to provide a DNA sample, much less care for the kid.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 11:57 PM
–

Nobody quoted anything. Lol But you assumed I’m uncomfortable with no reason. You seem as intellectually impaired as OP.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/25 02:05 PM
0

“Let’s ignore the top men because I can’t get one and make an argument that makes no sense.”
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/25 12:17 PM
1

Because you act like it (no offense, just trying to help you out) Wanting to get to know someone is good. That’s a perfect start. But unless it’s a woman you see all the time, you’d need to at least ask for her time, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/25 09:13 AM
1

You must be really low on the desirability pole. I’m guessing? I mean, natural selection is a thing…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/25 08:03 AM
1

Get some self esteem, love yourself and take care of yourself (gym, productive activities, make good money, etc.) then yes, cold approach.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/25 08:02 AM
1

I never said anything about you getting a yes or how your experience goes. I simply answered your question.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/25 07:52 AM
2

And women are still complaining about them approaching. Nobody said anything about civilized men who are good.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/25 07:50 AM
0

And women are HYPERGAMOUS. They anyway want the top % of dudes. Are you 5? Edit: Always, not anyway
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/25 07:48 AM
1

It’s also a way they can weed out some, too. The weenies/guys who know they are low on the desirability list will listen to them and stop approaching. Real men will still approach anyway. And they know this.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/25 07:43 AM
1

They mean they don’t want creepy or low-status guys approaching them. If Chris Hemsworth or Channing Tatum approached her do you think she would complain?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/25 07:39 AM
-1

Solution: If you want something, go get it. Men who won’t approach a woman they want are asking to be single, not to mention being pu**ies.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/25 05:16 AM
0

It is the adjective for the noun definition you just posted. She mentioned the adjective, not the noun. Yes, the dictionary’s definition is on point and by far not “unrelated.” Lol (maybe unliked by you?) The correlation is still there, too. One who has many sexual partners is more indiscriminate. One who has few partners (not promiscuous) uses more judgment. Edit: Spelling from bad autocorrect
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/25 07:42 AM
1

No, they’re not. LOL I guess you can’t read.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/25 03:51 AM
1

You’re the only one who mentioned causation lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/25 03:29 AM
1

Correct. Nobody here said it was. Your definition isn’t the real definition. Having something to do with something else / “relation” is not causation, it’s correlation.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/25 03:27 AM
1

It’s different from yours in that you’ve claimed it means “having higher than average short term relationships” and that impulsivity doesn’t have anything to do with it. I’m proving you wrong. And yes it can, and they go through a “hoe phase”. So yes, impulsivity/lack of control has to do with promiscuity.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/25 01:35 AM
1

Actually, Webster defines promiscuity as “miscellaneous mingling or selection of persons or things : INDISCRIMINATENESS” in its second of two listed definitions. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/promiscuity Less judgment, or as Webster says it, indiscriminateness, is a result of impulsivity/lack of control. So yes, there is a correlation between impulsivity/lack of control and promiscuity. And btw, this can even be seen in a lot of women. Get to know one who just got dumped by a man sh…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/25 12:58 AM
1

“Genetics determines everything.” In what life? None. Even mental conditions including ASD, ADHD, schizophrenia, etc. have an environmental factor at play. Genetics NEVER determine everything. Take a bio class.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/25 12:47 AM
1

LOL Tell me you don’t know brain science at all without telling me you’re clueless asf in brain science. Girls do mature faster than men. It’s a biological fact. Do I need to explain the neurology and neurodevelopment? Nah, you can research it. This topic isn’t even gender bias; it’s scientific fact. Just 😂😂😂
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/25 07:55 AM
2

Prove it then. I’ll wait and watch. Because no, you did the same to the other user. Your problem is you want to think that refusal is inability. It’s not.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/25 08:18 PM
1

No because I didn’t create the kid
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/25 08:14 PM
2

You wish I wasn’t. But you don’t know me.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/25 08:13 PM
0

I’m pointing out that you were doing exactly what you were accusing him of.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/25 08:11 PM
1

You asked why the widows get a pass. No, the issues are not the same, and he explained. 2. In this case yes it is because you view both as wrong. That’s comparable. And it could be any other deed you consider wrong as well. The point is he’s justifying his standard, not demoralizing anyone. What people do is their choice, but that doesn’t mean we have to suffer with them.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/25 11:24 AM
0

But you suggesting him mind his business is exactly the same thing lmaooooo If you can give advice, so can he.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/25 11:13 AM
1

For me it’s not even a money issue. I make plenty of money and could take on four or five kids immediately, even with me being the only one working. I’m just not going to raise another man’s kid.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/25 11:12 AM
2

YOU want it to be his/men’s deficiencies. But it’s not. I’m a doctor, about to start my own practice, make six figures a year, considered an 8 or 9 out of 10 in terms of looks my whole life (have been called a 7 once lol), age 29, work out, take pride in providing, love my lady and my baby son with all my heart and wouldn’t put anything over them. And I promise you, I would not have ever been interested in a single mom. That’s not my problem; it would be the woman’s. Lol That’s what he’s saying …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/25 10:53 AM
2

He explained why the widows are the exception. He didn’t demoralize anyone. He explained why he has the standard he has, which is good on his part. It’s like if a woman made a post saying why she wouldn’t date a child molester. All in all, just stating he wants someone who makes better decisions.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/25 10:33 AM
5

No, it really would be much more beneficial to improve income and make yourself look better. “If a guy could have fixed his looks, he would’ve already done it. If he could have gotten rich, he could’ve already been pursuing that.” This is where he fails. He would NOT have already done it, but nothing is stopping him from starting. He would rather whine than fix the problem. So no wonder he can’t get women. What those whiny guys are missing is the fact that he should focus on himself for himself,…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/25 10:23 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter