TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

EyeRedditDaily Archive

View 7 posts and 198 comments by EyeRedditDaily on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

MILF: Mom I'd Like to Fuck. Nope, nothing there about whether or not she enjoys sex.
/r/MensRights01/09/17 04:57 PM
1

physical recovery That's sick leave, not parental leave.
/r/MensRights31/08/17 11:56 PM
3

we believe that there are many differences between the sexes and that they Should be treated unequal. Speak for yourself, buddy. I believe men and women should have rights as close to equal as biology allows.
/r/MensRights31/08/17 11:44 PM
8

How is this post informative in the least? Are we supposed to judge that book by its cover?
/r/MensRights31/08/17 01:47 PM
34

/r/feminism is a hate group.
/r/MensRights31/08/17 01:44 PM
1

Most people, regardless of gender, don't want to work at all. Work is a means to an end. Priority one, of course, is to have enough money to live. But once you get past that, people want enough money so that they don't have to work any more. Men try to achieve this by attaining higher and higher paying jobs that will reduce the amount of time they have to work. Women do this by attaching themselves to men with access to money, meaning the women don't have to work any more.
/r/MensRights30/08/17 06:41 PM
13

What if I want to grow my balls dishonestly?
/r/MensRights26/05/15 03:27 PM
2

All I could figure was (a) the chick is really a dude, or (b) the "chick" is wearing white shoes before Memorial Day.
/r/MensRights21/05/15 05:45 PM
30

Reddit defines harassment as “continued actions” that would make someone “conclude that Reddit is not a safe platform to express their ideas.” So if a person continuously has their comments deleted by moderators of a particular subreddit, that would be the textbook definition of Reddit harassment, correct? I mean, it is "continued action" and it outright means that Reddit isn't a safe place to express ideas.
/r/MensRights18/05/15 05:50 PM
4

You won't believe what happens next!
/r/MensRights18/05/15 05:45 PM
0

all too often I see people here on this subreddit doing the exact same thing. Yes. That's when we're mocking the feminists.
/r/MensRights12/05/15 04:55 PM
-18

LOL. Stopped watching at non-American accent. The biggest issue regarding circumcision in America is that you don't want your kid to be the one with the funny looking dick - whether it is in the locker room or with his first few girlfriends. Of course in Europe and South America that isn't a concern because typically its going to be the cut dick that's the funny looking one.
/r/MensRights11/05/15 06:08 PM
5

a presumably rational woman I think that's the question at hand. Anyone defending the guy isn't attributing the quality of "rational" to this woman. I have no doubt that she thinks she was raped. I have no doubt that he thinks the sex was consensual. One of them is wrong and, presumably, that would make one of the irrational. It's 50/50 as to which one.
/r/MensRights08/05/15 05:47 PM
6

Dear lord.... she wasn't okay with it, and you knew it because you kept asking if she was okay. I know you're rationalizing that you didn't rape her, but you did, and you knew at the time that something was wrong. So now even asking for consent repeatedly (which I thought was what we were supposed to be doing now) is evidence of rape because you wouldn't keep asking if you didn't sense that she wasn't consenting. Nevermind that she repeatedly confirmed that nothing was wrong.
/r/MensRights08/05/15 05:39 PM
8

Yep. Lawyer. No other reasonable option.
/r/MensRights07/05/15 09:25 PM
2

Accused where? With police? On social media? In your circle of friends?
/r/MensRights07/05/15 08:46 PM
1

Good2Go tried this. I think the real key with the app is that it needs to provide for "continuous and ongoing" consent if it is truly going to protect men. I'm no good at coding, but I figure the best way to accomplish this is through fingerprint/biometrics and having your partner hold the phone throughout the sexual encounter. Once the finger leaves the screen for a second or two, an audible alarm (with flashing lights) sounds and the man knows to instantly stop sex and verify whether consent i…
/r/MensRights07/05/15 05:03 PM
0

Cops gonna do what cops gonna do.
/r/MensRights06/05/15 08:16 PM
7

accused him of raping your cat calling /u/I_rape_cates
/r/MensRights06/05/15 05:07 PM
1

In the interest of getting a good grade, I'd recommend that you hit these three topics: What really is the wage gap? When people say that women earn 77 cents for every dollar a man makes, what does that really mean? The answer, of course, is that the men and the women aren't doing equal work and aren't even putting in the same hours of work. Now that you've defined what the wage gap really is (i.e., not based upon equal work), let's talk about what causes the wage gap. Things like women preferri…
/r/MensRights05/05/15 08:30 PM
2

thnx. corrected.
/r/MensRights05/05/15 06:27 PM
19

Oh what tangled webs we weave when first we contract to conceive.
/r/MensRights05/05/15 05:48 PM
7

In a nutshell... Feminism is about correcting perceived social injustices like women not wanting to work in STEM jobs, cat-calling, women doing too much housework, etc. They try to correct these perceived injustices by supporting legislation that favors women at the expense of men. Men's rights is about correcting injustices in the legal system - including both legislative injustices (like selective service, reproductive rights) and judicial injustices (family court / alimony / child support / c…
/r/MensRights05/05/15 05:40 PM
-8

Cheating is the result of a bad relationship, not the cause of one.
/r/MensRights05/05/15 05:20 PM
-1

This is a bit troubling... The Four Seasons, however, issued a statement saying the incident did not happen on any of its properties and that David Goldberg was not registered as a guest in any of the resort’s rooms, villas or residences.
/r/MensRights05/05/15 02:52 PM
7

Cheating is the result of a bad relationship, not the cause of one.
/r/MensRights05/05/15 02:12 PM
1

What do we know about his death. All I've heard is that he died while on vacation. But I thought it was more of a "natural causes" type thing. No?
/r/MensRights05/05/15 02:12 PM
6

Jokes on her. She may have had sex with 324 men, but only a small fraction, if any of them, actually contracted HIV.
/r/MensRights05/05/15 12:53 AM
35

"911, what is your emergency?" "My avatar is being raped! My AVATAR is being RAPED!"
/r/MensRights01/05/15 04:51 PM
3

The Catholic church can start by paying women priests the same as... oh, wait.... Hardly a reliable source for this message.
/r/MensRights29/04/15 05:02 PM
3

I'm going to give the Pope the benefit of the doubt and assume he was talking more globally that feminists and President Obama typically do on this topic. I have no idea whether or not there is an actual gender pay gap in some 3rd world countries, but it seems likely. Perhaps he was referring to that.
/r/MensRights29/04/15 05:01 PM
5

Extreme, unrealistic example: 10 serial rapists live in a home together. A woman knows that the rapists live there. She gets invited to a party there and shows up wearing only her underwear. She proceeds to get drunk and passes out. One of the serial rapists does what serial rapists do and rapes her. Using the wording of the question, did that rape happen because the woman put herself in a bad situation? I would say that the answer to that is "yes", but I would emphasize my caveat from my origin…
/r/MensRights28/04/15 09:23 PM
74

It is not necessary to ask for consent to sexual activity if you are in a relationship with your sexual partner Strongly Agree (consent is implied unless otherwise communicated) I believe it is important to get consent before any sexual activity Agree (but said consent need not be verbal) When someone is raped or sexually assaulted, it is usually because the person was unclear in the way that they said "no" Disagree (That is not usually the cause, but sometimes it is a contributing factor in act…
/r/MensRights28/04/15 05:40 PM
22

Just make sure you never verbally say "yes" to having sex with a girl, and then report her for rape before she gets a chance to report you. What could go wrong?
/r/MensRights28/04/15 01:34 PM
4

What about that makes you think you were roofied? Sounds to me like you had too much to drink and blacked out. Unless you had a blood test, you are simply making assumptions.
/r/MensRights27/04/15 06:49 PM
22

Because the media is an active participant in that war on men.
/r/MensRights24/04/15 06:55 PM
2

Most of my female Facebook friends are married and not particularly attractive. What am I supposed to do with the ones who say "yes"?
/r/MensRights24/04/15 01:05 AM
1

the girl Ive been dating for the last month.... She is a self described "feminist", Why? Just why?
/r/MensRights23/04/15 08:17 PM
5

"I'm just there to dance with my friends".
/r/MensRights21/04/15 04:37 PM
3

So your original position, and your revised position, were both based 100% upon reddit. Why should we take you seriously? Do you take yourself seriously?
/r/MensRights20/04/15 02:47 AM
2

What caused you to change from believing men were the oppressed gender to believing women were the oppressed gender?
/r/MensRights20/04/15 02:41 AM
-2

So, don't let your son's future wife think he was in an industrial accident. Alternatively, don't let your son date Europeans.
/r/MensRights17/04/15 06:26 PM
4

No difference. Her positions on gender issues are identical to Barack Obama's.
/r/MensRights17/04/15 04:50 PM
1

So many questions.... If this works, they should try it for rape, murder and mugging too. That's the problem in this country, no one ever teaches men not to catcall, rape, murder or mug. Does this mean that catcalling is fine so long as there is no sign present? Can I still say "good morning" or "how you doing", or is that catcalling like they showed in the "walking in NYC" video?
/r/MensRights17/04/15 04:40 PM
6

I don't think Hillary's genitals makes a difference. It is the (D) behind her name that men should be wary of. Hell, we've got a man in the whitehouse right now and how has that worked out for men? He's been the best mouthpiece feminists have ever had for their bullshit 77% pay gap crap.
/r/MensRights16/04/15 05:20 PM
-1

Do you really think the Sheriff decided to lie to the press about what is on the tape No. However, I do believe that the Sheriff may be misinterpreting what is on the tape. And I strongly believe that, based upon that potential misinterpretation, he may have used hyperbolic language making the description of what is on the tape significantly worse that what may actually be on the tape. What about the rest of my post?
/r/MensRights15/04/15 09:21 PM
-1

She was (allegedly) completely unconscious and (allegedly) doesn't remember any of it. Hundreds of college students stood around watching an unconscious woman be (allegedly) raped on a public beach and did nothing except film it on their cell phones. You are missing the whole allegedly thing in your position. You are falling into the "man accused of rape is a rapist" trope that we see so often from feminists and the media. Face it. All you know about this case is that some cop saw a video and fr…
/r/MensRights15/04/15 06:32 PM
2

I like the whole "Take it or leave it" attitude that she shows. Yeah. Seems like she's a pretty ruthless negotiator for a woman.
/r/MensRights15/04/15 06:02 PM
-4

In her defense, it's not like anyone else is going to bang her.
/r/MensRights15/04/15 05:48 PM
0

I understand that it would be ridiculous to release the actual unedited video, but can anyone tell me what I'm supposed to be seeing in the video shown in that news clip? I saw nothing but college kids hanging out on the beach. I'm not saying that the alleged event happened or not. But I'm saying based upon what I saw, I have absolutely no idea whether it did nor not. All I know is that the police said it happened, used some hyperbolic language (filthy, disgusting, preying on a carcass, etc.), a…
/r/MensRights15/04/15 05:46 PM
12

Does this mean that I need to be overly paranoid and assume that every woman I meet is going to crack me over the head with a baseball bat?
/r/MensRights14/04/15 04:59 PM
6

A lot of what is posted here is done so in a facetious manner in an attempt to point out hypocrisies in feminism. If you read those posts and think they are genuine, while missing the facetiousness, you're going to be misinterpreting the "tone" of the sub overall.
/r/MensRights14/04/15 01:47 PM
2

“This bill is definitely one-sided towards the payer, the breadwinner and does not take into account or address the needs of the stay at home mother or the children,” she said. Duh. Yes it is one sided. When one side has been getting screwed for years, you're not going to "create equality" without a one-sided bill. It's like people whining about "tax cuts for the rich". Yeah, when one group pays the vast majority of the taxes already, then tax cuts are going to have a bigger impact on them than …
/r/MensRights09/04/15 08:53 PM
3

Leisa Athey, an Orlando mother who was in a 23-year marriage, questioned whether the bill could still have a retroactive effect since it would allow settlements to be modified once the spouse making the alimony payments retires. That can already happen without this bill. I think you're wrong on that under Florida law. I think that alimony requirements do not change if the payor "voluntarily reduces his/her income". Retiring would, obviously, be a voluntarily reduction in income. Selfish bastard!
/r/MensRights09/04/15 08:39 PM
2

I watched this last night and it was driving me nuts because I thought (as is typical for feminists) that they were playing with statistics again. I can't load the video at work or I'd point you to the time stamp, but there is one point where the activist lady says something like "we've even had situation where rapists coerce the victims into dropping the charges because the rapist tells them if they don't, the rapist will pursue custody/visitation". Now what's the problem with that statement? P…
/r/MensRights09/04/15 06:25 PM
11

Am I wrong in the following statement? The "default" position of feminism is that women are oppressed. So when feminists say that they are "just about gender equality" I think they actually believe what they are saying. The problem is, they can't even comprehend the idea that maybe, just maybe, women aren't oppressed. So they say they're for "gender equality" because they can't even comprehend how anyone could think that gender equality could be achieved by anything other than more rights for wo…
/r/MensRights09/04/15 05:43 PM
4

Yeah. I couldn't help but notice the absence of legal rights in that question.
/r/MensRights09/04/15 12:13 AM
1

I don't really know what this means, but here is a list of current NCAA women's basketball coaches. It is clearly an industry that is dominated by women. Yet, the most successful person in the industry is a man.
/r/MensRights08/04/15 02:34 PM
1

Exactly how would "feminism" cause women to be less fearful walking down a dark street? Feminism does everything legislatively. So I assume they would solve this problem by banning men from the streets after dark. Somehow, apparently, that would help men because women would no longer be afraid of them on the street after dark. I don't get the logic; I'm just the messenger.
/r/MensRights07/04/15 06:31 PM
3

Can I touch your boob" "Yes" 60 seconds later "Can I kiss your neck" "Yes" 60 seconds later "can I slide my hand in your pants" "yes". You're taking a big risk asking every 60 seconds. It needs to be continuous. Can I touch your boob? Can I keep touching your boob? Can I keep touching your boob? Can I keep touching your boob?
/r/MensRights07/04/15 06:24 PM
2

Half way through I wanted to stop, but she demanded I go on. By any chance, did this event occur on a California state university campus? Because if so, you were raped. Under the recently passed "affirmative consent" law, your partner is required to read your mind and know if you are withdrawing consent. Since you wanted to stop, and she didn't, that's rape.
/r/MensRights07/04/15 06:20 PM
8

Rape is a legal term with different meanings in different jurisdictions (in Florida, for example, there is no law against "rape"; just degrees of sexual assault). Since the military has its own legal code, it is entirely possible that the officer was right and that scenario would not constitute rape under the military penal code. Now the contention that "the woman is not at fault"? That's a bit more troubling. It may or may not be referred to as "rape", but clearly the woman did something wrong …
/r/MensRights07/04/15 02:28 AM
14

MRA’s having many times spoken up to say that men are also victims of sexual assault which is true, but I’ve also seen MRA’s admit that it is because it goes unreported because men don’t want to be the victim. I believe this is due to the way society views “masculinity”, and that male victims of sexual assault feel as though there place in society would be diminished but having the title of a victim. No no no no no. It is because if somebody grabs a guy's ass at a bar, they don't get all bent ou…
/r/MensRights06/04/15 05:59 PM
40

Feminists and MRA’s are looking for gender equality. MRAs want to achieve equality by eliminating legal gender bias resulting from either the design or enforcement of laws. Feminists want to achieve equality by expanding gender specific legislation to eliminate societal and cultural inequalities. I don't think there is a lot of common ground between "eliminate the legalization of gender bias" and "legislate more gender bias".
/r/MensRights06/04/15 05:54 PM
8

Could someone more eloquent than me do an AMA request for this woman? How could she say no? But if she says yes, and leaves it unedited, it's going to be a trailer park fire.
/r/MensRights06/04/15 04:03 PM
2

I consider it making a move, not harassment.
/r/MensRights05/04/15 09:13 PM
5

posts mostly consisting of challenges to "fairness" i.e. "she does this why can't I". this subreddit is mostly feeding into what is undermining men in the first place I think you misinterpret those posts. They aren't typically advocating for some specific action. Rather they are pointing out the hypocrisy of feminism.
/r/MensRights03/04/15 04:19 PM
2

I'm more likely to vote against the feminist candidate than for the men's rights candidate. Primarily because there are no men's rights candidates.
/r/MensRights03/04/15 04:16 PM
7

So empowering!
/r/MensRights03/04/15 04:11 PM
2

decide whether you'd rather have a family or the ability to completely pursue your interests But whether you pursue, or don't pursue your interest is your choice and a choice you wake up with and make every day. It is always your choice and no one else can take that choice from you. But if you choose the family, not only do you have to choose that every day, but your wife does too. If she doesn't, then you end up wither neither the family nor (potentially) the ability to pursue your interests. Y…
/r/MensRights02/04/15 08:18 PM
1

Cops gonna cop
/r/MensRights29/03/15 12:40 AM
1

Because (most) men don't fucking give a shit about what other people think or say about them and don't end up dysfunctional in the fetal position in the corner because of "body shaming" by some dolt. This is especially true of older men (and by "older", I mean, like over 13) - which is the demographic that is most likely to be bald.
/r/MensRights27/03/15 08:04 PM
5

women are choosing better hours over better pay. Men are more likely to make decisions on the side of making money. No one ever talks about the desirable working hours gap. :(
/r/MensRights27/03/15 12:52 AM
6

fights for men oppressed by abusive partners I've never seen this from any large-scale feminist organization. It is token "oh, and men who are abused too" interest, if any. fights for homosexuals I'm not gay and have no problem with gay folk, so I don't need feminism for this. The LGBT community seems to be fully capable of fighting for their own rights without the assistance from feminist. This seems like a "glom on" reaction by feminists that, 10 years from now, will be claiming gay marriage e…
/r/MensRights26/03/15 05:19 PM
1

Clearly the part of the article that we can't see explains that the sex was non-consensual. I mean, otherwise the part of the article that we can see makes no sense.
/r/MensRights26/03/15 05:09 PM
7

Watched that last night. I was surprised Stewart even asked the question about "how do you respond to criticisms that the colleges treat the accused poorly" (or something like that). The funny part was the response. They made zero distinction between an accused and a perpetrator. The answer they gave (something about how few rapists are expelled) just assumed that if a person is accused, the person is guilty - typical.
/r/MensRights26/03/15 04:30 PM
2

Clearly wrong because 1 in 4 women are raped every day on a college campus.
/r/MensRights26/03/15 04:25 PM
50

I could be wrong, but none of the protesters appeared to be wives so the billboard wasn't referring to them anyway.
/r/MensRights26/03/15 04:23 PM
2

"Hmmm... I'm confused. Where exactly is it that women are legally oppressed?"
/r/MensRights25/03/15 05:25 PM
2

If this scenario actually happened, wouldn't most guys just laugh it off anyway? Seriously. If some dude hung out where I typically did and was always making stupid comments to me ("nice ass", "I'd like some of that", etc.), I'm not going to let it ruin my day. It's his problem, not mine. To me it is just another example like the "walking in NYC" video - women making a bigger deal of an issue that is warranted by my male mind.
/r/MensRights25/03/15 04:36 PM
16

"Victim blaming or shining the spotlight on her for coming forward is not the right approach," Gillibrand said on "The Capitol Pressroom," a public radio show in Albany. And no reporter will ever ask her to justify the ludicrousy of this statement. You can't blame a victim when there is no victim.
/r/MensRights25/03/15 04:28 PM
1

Pretty much every argument is one of semantics.
/r/MensRights25/03/15 12:24 AM
1

http://i.imgur.com/st0GcIB.jpg http://i.imgur.com/M6lIfUo.jpg
/r/MensRights25/03/15 12:10 AM
1

You should back that up, kind sir. Not a Problem
/r/MensRights24/03/15 11:52 PM
2

Our definitions were different Perhaps I need to be more clear: Your definition is wrong.
/r/MensRights24/03/15 09:33 PM
1

Just said "this context" to avoid confusion over alternative definitions of "sex" such as "sexual intercourse". Sex = Gender.
/r/MensRights24/03/15 09:19 PM
3

I tend to use 'gender' as one's identity, and 'sex' as one's physical make up. In this context, gender and sex are synonyms.
/r/MensRights24/03/15 08:54 PM
5

I'd like to have a debate with MRAs and feminists /r/femradebates if 'the genders' is a construct we made up to begin with False premise. The genders isn't a construct we made up. The genders are males born with penises and xy chromosomes; and females born with xx chromosomes. With a random mutation thrown in every once in a while that is irrelevant to the discussion.
/r/MensRights24/03/15 08:14 PM
20

In my day - pre internet - it was ignorance. Unless you had a male friend or relative who had gone through a financially crippling divorce, you didn't know the shitstorm you were signing up for when you signed the marriage certificate. You thought you were just agreeing to love each other - didn't realize it was a legally binding contract enforced by the government.
/r/MensRights24/03/15 04:43 PM
0

It turns out that well-informed people of all types are on the same page with this topic and the under-informed are on another page. In summation: Well-informed people know the wage gap is bullshit. Only the ignorant continue to repeat it. The one thing that misses is that it isn't just the ignorant who repeat it. It is also those who wish to intentionally mislead others into believing the wage gap exists; and they do so for either political, or personal, gain. Hell, even the POTUS repeats misle…
/r/MensRights20/03/15 05:35 PM
1

Now can someone come up with a list of 5 feminist heroes that were awesome people? That's the bigger challenge.
/r/MensRights20/03/15 05:03 PM
3

This sub is more focused on bashing feminism Who do you think set things up in college so you'd get falsely accused of "sexual misconduct" and the unfair apparatus, if not feminists? Exactly this. If not for the feminist agenda, he wouldn't have been in the position 2 years ago to be assumed guilty by a campus "hearing" judge. That "tribunal" and that "judge" wouldn't even exist if not for feminists. And today is even worse that it was 2 years ago. Now you have places like California colleges wh…
/r/MensRights20/03/15 05:01 PM
2

Feminists should be outraged by that. Feminism is just about equality of the genders TM. Feminist cannot rest until women are victimized by crime just as often as men.
/r/MensRights13/03/15 09:22 PM
1

slut being a slur This is the real problem. Slut is not a slur unless it is used by women against other women. Generally speaking, men are anywhere from apathetic to enthusiastic about sluts.
/r/MensRights12/03/15 02:53 PM
1

regret isn't rape * Does not apply on University of California campuses
/r/MensRights11/03/15 04:44 PM
3

I can only speak for myself, don't know to what extent other here agree. My basic viewpoint is that "consent is consent". So long as that consent isn't given under some type of threat, consent is valid. It isn't my responsibility to give a breathalyzer or blood test to every potential partner and then assess whether or not the consent they have granted is valid. I may choose to opt out of sex if I question the validity of their consent, but legally, I shouldn't be held responsible for doing anyt…
/r/MensRights10/03/15 09:20 PM
1

People are confused about consent because feminists actively campaign and push to confuse the idea of consent.
/r/MensRights10/03/15 04:51 PM
0

that's why we rely on statistics and research for these things Those statistics and research are useless. That's what I'm telling you. Because of the reasons stated in my earlier post.
/r/MensRights09/03/15 04:32 PM
3

"Don't put drugs in women's drinks" Whoa. Hold on just a second there buddy. Are you trying to suggest that being drugged increases a woman's chance of being raped? Because I've always heard that women can get as drunk as they want and it doesn't increase their chances of getting raped. To suggest otherwise is victim blaming. So why is it different when they drug themselves vs. when someone else drugs them?
/r/MensRights09/03/15 04:00 PM
6

Sounds like America will continue to solidify our position as the world's economic power.
/r/MensRights09/03/15 03:56 PM
1

There is no way to know because (a) most rapes probably go unreported and (b) people don't agree on what is, and isn't rape - so even if people agree 100% on the circumstances of a sexual encounter, some people will call it rape and others will call it regretted, consensual sex.
/r/MensRights09/03/15 03:55 PM
7

I've seen many mra's want to keep arguing that women are raped because their own behaviour I don't think this is true. I think you misunderstand what you are hearing or reading. I have never heard anyone (outside of crazy middle east countries) claim that a rape victim was at fault for her own rape because of her actions or behavior. What I have heard is people questioning the legitimacy of a rape claim based upon the accuser's behavior and actions. Questioning whether or not a victim actually e…
/r/MensRights09/03/15 01:49 PM
2

the real issue, which is WHY so many women choose to be teachers and secretaries and hairdressers and office clerks, instead of having higher career goals and setting themselves on a path to acquire the high-paying jobs. Ummm..... because they can? If you've got a spouse pulling in $100,000 and is willing to support your lifestyle with that salary, why the hell do you need to work 70 hour weeks to earn your own $100,000? Especially when the courts will require your spouse to continue to support …
/r/MensRights09/03/15 01:38 PM
6

We do ourselves no favor casting a political light over these issues. Bullshit! The only way we are going to make changes to these issues is through legislative changes. And we have a choice between the Republicans who are generally silent on gender issues, and the Democrats who flat out tell you that they're going to pander to women at the expense of men. I'll go with the folks who, at least, aren't flat-out telling me that they aren't going to represent my interests.
/r/MensRights08/03/15 09:05 PM
1

What can happen when you like a 15F when your an 18M Misleading headline. You can like, and even date, that 15F all you like. It is when you have sex with her than problems start arising.
/r/MensRights06/03/15 09:41 PM
5

the cop follows procedure This is what the "cops are assholes" crowd doesn't understand. Cops were born assholes, they are trained to be assholes. While there is certainly a problem with some cops who pursue the career simply because they want to have "AUTHORITAH", the overall problem with cops is that they are trained to follow procedures that make them assholes.
/r/MensRights06/03/15 09:38 PM
3

Thank goodness they were taught not to rape. The natural action would have been to join in the rape.
/r/MensRights06/03/15 09:33 PM
0

teasing other guys dicks didn't happen Because the "are you gay" retort of "why the fuck you looking at my dick; you like dicks?" is too obvious.
/r/MensRights06/03/15 01:51 AM
2

'Merica, son. In my small town, Midwestern school, I think there was only one uncut guy (not that I was looking), and he was from Mexico.
/r/MensRights05/03/15 08:08 PM
1

Tell them you're a woman and take your 10%. I doubt they're going to make you drop trou to prove it.
/r/MensRights05/03/15 04:22 PM
-3

I think it is awesome and am so happy that I didn't have to grow up as the guy with the "weird dick" in the middle school locker room.
/r/MensRights05/03/15 04:18 PM
-12

...how does one prove consent You can't. Consent isn't evidenced by words or actions. Consent is a frame of mind. Regardless of what a person says or does, only they know whether or not they are consenting to an action of their own free will. And "consent", without free will, isn't consent at all. So in the case of rape, you can prove consent by never being accused of rape. After all, if a person really wanted to have sex with you, they wouldn't accuse you of rape. If a person really wanted to h…
/r/MensRights04/03/15 06:20 PM
5

I think that intent to falsely accuse - and the ability to prove that intent beyond a reasonable doubt - should result in severe punishment (whether that should be equal to the accused crime, I'm not sure). If I see Bill shoot his wife in the head the day before she went missing, and I accuse Bill of murdering his wife, I shouldn't be punished at all. Even if she turns up 100% alive 3 months later. But if I get in a disagreement with Bill, kidnap his wife and accuse him of murdering her, then I …
/r/MensRights03/03/15 07:48 PM
19

This is Madison, Wisconsin. Let's face it, if you're a guy and choose to go to college there (or Berkley, CA), you're playing Russian roulette.
/r/MensRights03/03/15 05:26 PM
1

2 main problems: The guy saying "I am not a rapist" carries no more or less weight than the girls saying "I was raped". In the vast, vast, vast majority of cases, we'll never actually know what happened. People don't agree upon what rape is. Both the guy and the girl may think they are telling the truth. One person's regret is another person's rape. The solution is to fight against the feminist activism to reclassify regret as rape.
/r/MensRights03/03/15 05:21 PM
7

What makes men feel the need to defend women who are complete strangers? Feminism. #HeForShe
/r/MensRights03/03/15 03:43 PM
4

LOL. Why does it make you sad? "As a man", I couldn't possibly care less about this. There are actual, real issues out there for men. This sign isn't one of them.
/r/MensRights02/03/15 05:25 PM
-8

LOL. Good one.
/r/MensRights01/03/15 12:49 AM
0

Just like anyone else whose views don't 100% align with either party, you just have to decide which issues are the most important to you and go with the candidate/party that shares you views on the most important issues. Republicans are generally silent of men's rights / feminist issues. Democrats are flat out telling you that they are going to support feminist issues - facts be damned - at the expense of men and men's rights. You can be an MRA and vote Democratic, but your MRA issues is not ver…
/r/MensRights27/02/15 06:50 PM
2

Requires extra work on my point to avoid web clicks for a website. You're placing far more value on web clicks than I do.
/r/MensRights26/02/15 12:53 AM
1

Ya think?
/r/MensRights25/02/15 10:26 PM
8

Sometimes when women walk stoically down the streets of New York wearing jeans and a T-shirt, unattractive men talk to them. I know its true because I've seen the video.
/r/MensRights25/02/15 08:11 PM
4

That means the school would have roughly 100 girls would vanish and never come back to school. You're forgetting that they vanish, so no one can see them. How can you report a story that you can't see? Didn't think about that... did ya?
/r/MensRights25/02/15 07:55 PM
2

Did you not read the linked article?
/r/MensRights25/02/15 04:44 PM
4

One out of every three women are taken on spring break each year, and two out of the three taken, never survive and are never found. I am the blessed statistic that did survive and was found. You can't argue with statistics!
/r/MensRights25/02/15 04:24 PM
0

Don't hit them in the face where it will show.
/r/MensRights25/02/15 01:46 AM
1

When we have white feminists fighting with black feminists fighting with gay feminists, I can't help but think that is a good thing because it distracts them from getting on with their business of oppressing men. And I do find it particularly humorous that Ms. Arquette seems to think that white women face greater hardships in America than black men or gay men. It is a perfect reflection of feminist's disassociation with reality and victim mentality. And it is particularly relishing that she brin…
/r/MensRights24/02/15 05:33 PM
10

Women have the legal availability to opt out of parenthood after conception. Men do not.
/r/MensRights21/02/15 12:13 AM
1

When people talk about hating feminism what they usually mean is politically active feminism I agree with this. It is when feminists try to retain or enact laws that are detrimental to men that I would say that I really "oppose" feminism. If they're just trying to enact social changes, I'm not going to go out and "fight the good fight" with them, but since it doesn't negatively impact me, I'm fine with them fighting their fight. Like if women don't want to be "catcalled" and want to "educate" me…
/r/MensRights20/02/15 08:27 PM
2

• is a gateway drug to women. Why is this bad? • funnels excessive amounts of money through men to women. As long as a product or service is being provided by the woman in exchange for the man's money, why is this bad? And what makes porn different from a female-owned business? Are you suggesting that men should not spend money on anything that might directly or indirectly financially support women? Why would you suggest that? • funds an industry where men are paid less than women. Again, why is…
/r/MensRights18/02/15 09:54 PM
1

Just stick with the original
/r/MensRights18/02/15 06:07 PM
2

"slaps"
/r/MensRights18/02/15 05:15 PM
1

It would if I were on the jury.
/r/MensRights18/02/15 05:11 PM
1

the men who are complaining about marriage now are the people who have sold you guys out in the past You're making the incorrect assumption that information about marriage - and specifically that it was a bad deal for men - was as widely known in the past as it is today. It wasn't. The internet and the exchange of information that came with it has significantly enlightened the current generation of men. When I got married, I married a girl who had a similar job to me and held the exact same coll…
/r/MensRights18/02/15 03:45 PM
1

One of the fundamental tenets of consent when talking about sex is that being in a relationship with someone and/or having sex with someone in the past does not imply consent. I disagree with that. I think in reality, in most long-term, stable, quality relationships, on-going consent is implied between the partners - regardless of what feminists want you to believe (it appears their propaganda is working on you). Obviously either partner always has the right to decline. And if you're in the midd…
/r/MensRights18/02/15 03:06 PM
4

That's what I don't get ... rape is bad ... no shit!? You don't get it because you're using your definition of rape. You're saying that sex without consent is bad. And you're trying to figure out "who the hell doesn't understand that? Obviously sex without consent is bad". But when they say "rape" they don't mean sex without consent. They mean sex that is later regretted (because, if you truly really really wanted to have sex with someone, you wouldn't regret it later) is rape. So when they say …
/r/MensRights18/02/15 01:58 AM
0

Express or implied consent while previously awake. Like in the example that /u/DavidByron2 mentioned above - a wife waking up her husband with a blowjob. Consent could be expressly given: "Honey, if you ever want to wake me up with a blowjob, it is fine with me". Or, consent could be implied: They've been in a relationship for years where blowjobs frequently occur and have never been refused or rejected. If offers of a blowjob are always met with enthusiasm, it is reasonable to assume that conse…
/r/MensRights18/02/15 01:53 AM
67

Now, "pay equity" is simply about making sure women earn the same as men, regardless of their own choices. That's what it has always been about. The only change here is that they are actually admitting it.
/r/MensRights18/02/15 01:04 AM
-10

Yes you can consent to something if you are asleep.
/r/MensRights17/02/15 10:38 PM
-9

I disagree. In a long-term relationship where sex is a regular part of the relationship, it is safe to assume consent absent contrary information. Going upthread, we both agree that consensual sex is not rape. That was the original statement I made. Is it not true that you agree with that? All we're discussing is what is, and what isn't "consent".
/r/MensRights17/02/15 10:00 PM
-16

No. If a wife wakes her husband with a blowjob, I would say there was consent (unless there is some evidence to the contrary).
/r/MensRights17/02/15 09:46 PM
36

Disrespect is now abuse just like regret is now rape.
/r/MensRights17/02/15 07:36 PM
13

"sex without consent is always rape" No one disagrees with that. It's when the feminists start trying to say that consensual sex is rape that we start having problems.
/r/MensRights17/02/15 07:21 PM
2

Was the song "a boy named sue" about this guy?
/r/MensRights17/02/15 04:35 PM
3

As a European, this simply doesn't make any sense. As an American, it doesn't make any sense either.
/r/MensRights17/02/15 03:41 PM
4

Don't vote for Democrats.
/r/MensRights17/02/15 03:28 AM
3

Mothers are more likely to receive custody because both parents usually understand that it is in the best interests of their children. In married two-partner households, women spend nearly twice as much time doing child care as their male partners. Not that I particularly agree with feminist's approach to arguments, it is sometimes helpful to use those arguments against them to point out their hypocrisy. When we point out to feminists that the alleged "gender pay gap" is the result of personal c…
/r/MensRights17/02/15 12:51 AM
3

Can't believe you suckered me into clicking on a Young Turks video. They basically play to base ignorance and spread propaganda. This video is no different. Questioning the 1-in-5 statistic is completely valid, and that's what Limbaugh was doing.
/r/MensRights12/02/15 08:51 PM
1

should "man up" when facing inequality, should keep his complaints to himself I don't think that is gendered though. Relatively speaking, conservatives believe everyone should fend for themselves and fix their own problems rather than whining to government and expecting politicians to solve their problems. Republicans believe women should also "man up" and keep their complaints to themselves.
/r/MensRights12/02/15 02:28 PM
2

I don't know why it's so hard for lefties to call out this bigoted It is called pandering to the female vote.
/r/MensRights12/02/15 12:07 AM
1

I'm unclear what point you're making. IMO, those comments seem to support mens rights and oppose feminism. Is that the point you're making, or are you saying that you see a problem with those statements. Either way, I'm not sure it is fair to compare Rand Paul - or especially Mike Huckabee (who I don't think has ever been elected to anything) to President Obama. Paul and Huckabee are somewhat "fringe" Republicans who aren't really electable on a national level. Barrack Obama and Hillary Clinton …
/r/MensRights12/02/15 12:06 AM
1

Only changing one side of the equation is what modern Feminism does and without a responding movement on the other side I'm curious how your real life feminist friends respond to this. In my experience, feminists don't recognize that there are areas in which women have the advantage. Or, if they do admit that, they believe that the areas where men have the advantage so outweigh the areas where women have the advantage, that discussing the areas where women have the advantage isn't worthwhile.
/r/MensRights11/02/15 09:52 PM
17

So at worst, you've got two political parties that will treat men's rights the same (by essentially doing nothing). One of those parties constantly panders to women, repeats lies about a mythological pay gap, advocates for laws that overwhelmingly hurt men in family court and mentions at least daily that the other party is waging a "war against women". Sorry, but given a choice of the two parties who won't do anything to help me, I'll proceed with the one who is at least silent on the issues, ra…
/r/MensRights11/02/15 07:36 PM
2

More feasible than adopting a child as a single male.
/r/MensRights11/02/15 05:50 PM
8

I don't really get concerned with "social inequality" because I can choose to ignore or battle those inequalities as an individual. Most of the examples you gave are social inequalities (prison sentencing, perhaps, being the exception). What I'm concerned about is legally enforceable inequalities. There is nothing we can do about those except try to get the legislation changed. Women can whine all they want about "men's night" at a bar. They just sound whiny when you look at that as one of their…
/r/MensRights11/02/15 05:16 PM
8

If the privileged group doesn't need to celebrate their privilege, then what the hell is feminism about?
/r/MensRights11/02/15 03:48 PM
-2

I am very pro abortion rights. Then get rid of circumcision This is so inconsistent to me. Feel free to kill your baby before it is born; just don't cut his weiner if you actually birth him.
/r/MensRights11/02/15 03:33 PM
1

End permanent alimony and limit alimony to a maximum of 4 years (the amount of time it takes to get a college degree) in the most extreme cases. Give men equal rights in child custody, and eliminate child support payments in situation where custody is equally shared. Reclaim the definition of rape to only mean sex with the absence of consent. Provide men with reproductive rights equal to those afforded to women. That's really it for me. Get those 4 taken care of and I'm good.
/r/MensRights11/02/15 03:32 PM
1

Feminists have done it by getting their sympathizers elected or appointed to positions of power and then having those sympathizers pass laws and rules that redefine rape and consent. The first step in reversing this is to campaign against those sympathizers. I think MRAs have done a reasonably decent job of making "feminist" a negatively perceived quality in a political candidate (at least in the US). While politicians can still gain political points by pandering to women (think of the constant …
/r/MensRights11/02/15 02:26 PM
9

Any debate over the frequency of "false rape allegations" is meaningless and doomed to failure unless and until both sides of the argument can agree upon what constitutes a false rape allegation. A girl gets willingly drunk, comes on to a guy, invites him back to her place and they have sex. In the morning, she says she was raped because she was in no condition to consent to sex. Most MRAs are going to categorize this as a false rape allegation. Most feminists are going to categorize this as an …
/r/MensRights10/02/15 08:58 PM
11

An interactive tool reviewing date from RateMyProfessors.com exposes gender biases in how students describe their teachers Why does it expose gender bias? Isn't it possible that female teachers actually are more likely to be annoying and bossy while male teachers are more likely to be clever and awesome? This is the problem with feminism (or, really, any activist movement); rather than looking for possible alternative explanations for differences, they jump to the conclusion that the differences…
/r/MensRights10/02/15 07:24 PM
8

And I really wish that somebody at that time had told me: “You know that it’s OK to be who you really are.” Ummmm... you're a Hollywood actress. Your fucking job - and the fame and riches that came with it - are there specifically because you act like someone you aren't.
/r/MensRights10/02/15 06:09 PM
42

I think the key here is long marriage. They don't say happy marriage. Yay! Have a long, miserable marriage. You win!
/r/MensRights10/02/15 05:31 PM
5

The Democrats War on Men continues.....
/r/MensRights09/02/15 02:57 PM
2

Feel free to point out a law (in the US) that is designed or enforced in a manner that results in an injustice to women.
/r/MensRights06/02/15 10:48 PM
2

I don't really see any legal injustices against women. And, at the end of the day, legally enforceable injustices are the only ones that I think should be changed. I don't think that we should try to force cultural issued by passing gender-biased laws.
/r/MensRights06/02/15 09:52 PM
3

Thanks to decades of feminist propaganda, the "default position" for most people is: Women are oppressed, men are the oppressors. So for most people if they hear "egalitarianism", their interpretation is going to be "support gender equality by correcting the injustices against women to make them more equal to men". By using the term "Mens Rights", it boldly states that we are talking about injustices against men that require corrective action in order to achieve gender equality.
/r/MensRights06/02/15 08:55 PM
-5

People can call themselves whatever they want. Like terrorists calling themselves muslims. Doesn't make it true.
/r/MensRights06/02/15 07:57 PM
-4

Yes.
/r/MensRights06/02/15 05:38 PM
-4

A quick google search tells me she's more of an anti-feminist than a feminist.
/r/MensRights06/02/15 05:33 PM
3

Feminists can be conservative I suppose in theory it could happen. I've never seen or heard of one though.
/r/MensRights06/02/15 03:55 PM
8

Obviously if you were really falsely accused, you would react by being emotional and hysterical. No one would be capable of logic with such rage inside them. #FeministLogic
/r/MensRights06/02/15 03:09 PM
6

feminists are right wingers I don't think you know what at least one of those words mean.
/r/MensRights06/02/15 02:59 PM
9

Even if he consented to sex with her, he didn't consent to having his picture and her bragging about the sex on social media. Clearly that lack of consent makes it rape!
/r/MensRights06/02/15 01:03 AM
2

It is not my responsibility to know why someone is choosing to have sex with me. My only responsibility is to be certain that they truly are choosing to have sex with me. I am not a breathalyzer.
/r/MensRights05/02/15 05:27 PM
5

If she consented to having sex, or even was the aggressor in the pursuit of sex, and then regretted her choice afterwards; that would be regretful, consensual sex.
/r/MensRights05/02/15 12:11 AM
1

Clearly the women assume that the truck is more expensive, which indicates the truck guy is wealthier.
/r/MensRights04/02/15 05:43 PM
33

"What can we do to end sexual violence? A first big step would be to distinguish between actual sexual violence and the appearance of excessive sexual violence. Everyone agrees that violence - sexual or otherwise - should be minimized. But under the current environment, there is no way to know whether sexual violence is even an issue. In the current environment, where regret is now deemed to be rape, the issue gets confused because one group of people is talking about actual, violent rape; while…
/r/MensRights04/02/15 05:40 PM
1

Everyone was very friendly and agreed that everyone should have equal rights. but...but... but..... that is feminism! ::SoConfused::
/r/MensRights03/02/15 09:00 PM
0

mmmm hmmmmm. you go girl! amiright?
/r/MensRights03/02/15 08:58 PM
3

I'm not sure what you feel we should be "fighting" in this situation. Are you just saying MRAs should be out there calling this guy an asshole? I don't think anyone would deny that, but I don't see how that "solves" anything. The solution is to give men the same rights to choose to be, or not be, a parent after pregnancy that women already have. MRAs are certainly fighting for that. It is one of the most frequent topics here.
/r/MensRights03/02/15 08:56 PM
1

I don't think you can be required to take a paternity test. The whole "your body, your choice" thing. The problem is, you may have to take one to prove that you aren't the father or the courts will just presume that you are.
/r/MensRights03/02/15 07:07 PM
-1

What part is the joke? The one where she hates little infant boys or the part that she feels the need to say it to the parents? Where is the humor in this? No one is saying it is good joke.
/r/MensRights02/02/15 03:14 PM
0

/r/nottheonion
/r/MensRights29/01/15 10:54 PM
15

The problem with "affirmative consent" isn't that people don't understand what it is. The problem is that it is insanely subject to abuse; or, to a lesser extent, subject to misinterpretation by the woman, not the man (sticking with traditional gender roles for the example). Abuse - This one is fairly straight forward. Regardless of what actually happened, all a girl has to do under "affirmative consent" is say "I didn't really want it" and suddenly, legally, it is rape. There is absolutely no w…
/r/MensRights28/01/15 07:30 PM
14

unpleasant, sexist feminists. triple redundancy
/r/MensRights28/01/15 03:49 PM
0

why are we so convinced that we know what the "real" definition of feminism is, and that it is bad? At a minimum, feminism presumes that women are more oppressed by society than men are. I've never seen any definition of feminism that doesn't have that as one of its core tenets. I don't believe that is true (in the United States). I believe both genders face different types of oppression by society and at best, the oppression pretty well evens out equally. Most likely, men are more oppressed by …
/r/MensRights28/01/15 02:51 PM
0

Cops gonna cop.
/r/MensRights28/01/15 01:20 AM
3

Why do Jews spend so much time bashing Nazi's instead of just promoting Jewish rights?
/r/MensRights28/01/15 01:15 AM
6

Dude had a regrettable sexual encounter. That it was with an older woman, or a teacher, is really irrelevant. Regret is nothing but regret. You can dwell on it and let it rule your life, or you can get over it and move on.
/r/MensRights27/01/15 06:00 PM
1

Cops gonna cop.
/r/MensRights27/01/15 05:42 PM
14

Carolyn seems like the type of girl who gets interrupted by men at work a lot, and then thinks it is because she is a woman. Also, thinks public school is a baby sitting service.
/r/MensRights27/01/15 05:35 PM
1

This is sad. I feel sorry for her.
/r/MensRights27/01/15 01:27 AM
3

In my opinion..... Splitting assets in a long-term, traditional marriage isn't a big deal. The couple who gets married in their 20's and don't really have many assets when they marry (probably have a bunch of student debt, and maybe a car). They are married for 20 years and acquire assets during the marriage. An even split of marital assets make sense. But that's where it should end. The real problem is alimony. You split the assets and both spouses are on equal footing coming out of the marriag…
/r/MensRights27/01/15 01:25 AM
1

"If you cannot afford a lawyer, one will be appointed for you"
/r/MensRights27/01/15 01:16 AM
11

Welcome to the world of AUTO insurance Interestingly, my employer charges the same for health insurance whether I'm a 25 year old guy who goes to the doctor once every 5 years, or a 58 year old woman who goes to the doctor every 5 days.
/r/MensRights23/01/15 08:44 PM
1

You seriously can't tell me that there aren't some situations in life where men get treated better than women. Just as there are some situations where women are treated better than men. Possibly semantics, because I don't disagree with that. My point is that the "better treatment" pretty much balances out (or possibly moderately favors women). I don't consider that "both genders having privilege". I consider that "both genders being treated equally by society".
/r/MensRights22/01/15 10:13 PM
13

Ummmm.... I do deny the existence of male privilege. For the record, Feminists deny the existence of female privlege.
/r/MensRights22/01/15 01:45 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter