TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

FFXIV_Machinist Archive

View 24 posts and 1,501 comments by FFXIV_Machinist on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
2617

FFXIV_Machinist/r/MensRights21/04/16 03:34 PM
326

Social IssuesFFXIV_Machinist/r/MensRights22/03/16 04:10 PM
171

FFXIV_Machinist/r/MensRights05/07/16 01:12 PM
140

FFXIV_Machinist/r/MensRights24/05/16 02:21 PM
132

GeneralFFXIV_Machinist/r/MensRights06/06/16 02:44 PM
81

ModeratorFFXIV_Machinist/r/MensRights04/04/16 02:51 PM
40

ModeratorFFXIV_Machinist/r/MensRights31/03/16 06:30 PM
33

QuestionsFFXIV_Machinist/r/MensRights28/05/16 02:39 PM
31

Social IssuesFFXIV_Machinist/r/MensRights18/12/15 07:21 PM
27

FFXIV_Machinist/r/MensRights15/08/16 01:13 PM
27

ModeratorFFXIV_Machinist/r/MensRights07/12/15 02:33 PM
21

FeminismFFXIV_Machinist/r/MensRights15/03/16 05:51 PM
20

ModeratorFFXIV_Machinist/r/MensRights20/04/16 08:10 PM
20

Social IssuesFFXIV_Machinist/r/MensRights03/05/16 10:11 PM
18

FFXIV_Machinist/r/MensRights11/07/16 06:03 PM
15

AMAFFXIV_Machinist/r/MensRights12/08/16 03:29 PM
12

FFXIV_Machinist/r/MensRights19/02/16 07:46 PM
10

FFXIV_Machinist/r/MensRights12/07/16 03:45 PM
9

FFXIV_Machinist/r/MensRights18/11/15 04:29 PM
9

Social IssuesFFXIV_Machinist/r/MensRights15/09/15 03:12 PM
7

Social IssuesFFXIV_Machinist/r/MensRights11/12/15 08:07 PM
5

Social IssuesFFXIV_Machinist/r/MensRights09/11/15 03:11 PM
3

FFXIV_Machinist/r/MensRights03/06/16 05:54 PM
0

GeneralFFXIV_Machinist/r/MensRights24/03/16 05:21 PM
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 1,501 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)

Please keep it clean. theres alot of "kys" and other suicide encouragement going on in here. if we see it it will be removed.
/r/MensRights30/12/16 02:19 PM
1

we arent allowed to publicize peoples information like this. while i think this is terrible, we have to remain within the rules of reddit.
/r/MensRights30/12/16 02:16 PM
1

likely yes. a bunch of SJW subs have a "hate sub filter bot" that automatically bans anyone with post history in a list of "hate subs". mens rights is on that list of percieved hate subs, and anyone who posts here, and then goes to like 2xc or feminisim, or SRS and posts is usally bot banned instantly.
/r/MensRights19/12/16 04:31 AM
31

To everyone mashing the report button: to anyone with half a brain, this title reads properly- for the other half: The OP was NOT advocating for the first case to not be called rape. we all know thats rape because in every part of the world that matters, children cant consent to sex- but that consent if given, is largely important in distinguishing between statutory rape, and actual rape. He was advocating for the second case to be called rape as well given they are nearly identical circumstance…
/r/MensRights08/12/16 06:49 PM
1

There are some background elements that weren't shared with atheist when the initial removal of that post happened, and its on us for not giving a full and detailed reason as to why; we've come to an accord/understanding as to why, so this was a false alarm. linking /u/imnotamrabut and /u/boozebumaddict so they have this response as well.
/r/MensRights06/12/16 10:05 PM
2

the narrative is crumbling <3
/r/MensRights30/11/16 04:32 PM
1

Consider the fact that we are NOT morphing into a white supremacist movement, but being attacked from the standpoint of race; resulting in defenses centered around race. Whats every SJW's favorite new attack? "Fucking Cis het white male" (remember gotta be sure you dont offend the white gay/transmen because by default theyre all feminists right???? /s. i fully well know that this isnt the case, but i dont think feminists/sjw types do.) How do you defend against that? you cant. its why they've ch…
/r/MensRights28/11/16 09:32 PM
1

if you subtract "white" from the statement, does it still hold true? if you replace "White" with black, does it still hold true? (not for that first one; nobodys telling you to feel like shit for being black). it makes their response an adequate one to the question posed.
/r/MensRights28/11/16 09:28 PM
1

no mens rights is NOT sliding into a white pride thing. Whats happening is that the SJW types have taken to attacking men on another level. they cant exactly go "oh look at those criminal black men - theyre the reason everything is bad", or "Oh those CIS-HET asian bastards are the fault of all our woes"- either of those statements would get them labeled as 'racist'. So they did the logical thing, and targeted men on a level they couldn't fight back from for fear of being labeled racist, or white…
/r/MensRights28/11/16 09:26 PM
2

just a word of caution when discussing immigrant rape: There is a Large organized effort in the EU to cover up, and subvert rape claims against refugees in the EU right now. i only bring this up because of the wording of the title. This case however- is cut and dry falsification and she got caught.
/r/MensRights28/11/16 05:41 PM

Removed- Brigading rule.
/r/MensRights28/11/16 05:37 PM
1

Why? Where would you house them? you couldn't construct this while within the magnetosphere. trying to move a mega structure out of LEO into outer space would destroy the structure we were trying to build- hence why it has to be built further out- also because its going to have to be re-located closer to the asteroid belt at some point. the ultimate goal is not to bring asteroids to earth, but to bring only the raw materials we need back to earth orbit. Yes, elements on the outside of an asteroi…
/r/MensRights15/11/16 08:05 PM
1

Because these stations will be more than an automated hub, which would limit their usefulness. your comprehension sucks dude. im talking about building a station FOR people, using robots. using PEOPLE to build a station for PEOPLE before we are fully established and able to manufacture in space is insane. First off, you know (or should know) that the water needs of a system like this aren't that massive. currently the ISS gets about 900 pounds of water every 6 months. that water is recycled and …
/r/MensRights15/11/16 07:34 PM
1

Because things happen to people in Zero g that can affect their long term health. again you dont even get what im saying....... im saying Why put people up there at all when we can operate machinery remotely? if were constructing it just out side of the magnetosphere, we can easily do that remotely from the surface of earth. so now instead of lifting 100-200 200 pound people, plus their air, plus their food, plus their water, plus their belongings, plus their other needed supplies like medicine …
/r/MensRights15/11/16 06:09 PM
1

You make many assumptions that we will never use any method of artificial gravity (as in centrifugal force, or even better an actual artificial gravity). you miss my point. Gravity is every engineers worst enemy for the most part. why put people up in space, create gravity, and have to use extra force and energy, when you could operate in zero g using no effort at all with a dinky little machine to move hundreds of pounds? They found it works, but they hypothesized it might be creating some exha…
/r/MensRights14/11/16 09:36 PM
1

No we can't. And we have no path to this ability in the near future Were already doing it. i personally know someone working on the code for prefabs that can be constructed purely by ground based drones by reading a pre-printed barcode on the part, and then placed based off of a pre-constructed 3d blueprint. this is still largely in development; basically they place triangulation points around the work site and the drones know exactly where to place things in what orientation. its still largely …
/r/MensRights14/11/16 08:58 PM
1

dont get me wrong- i largely agree. gender politics should have never gotten into the military. women can be combatants, but largely should not be by merit of their physiology- a few can hack it, the rest cant.
/r/MensRights14/11/16 08:24 PM
1

As a former Army Reserves member I consider female soldiers 60% of real soldiers due to the blatantly discriminatory standards. There's a clear cut difference in reducing the criteria because they want to pander to women, and reducing the criteria because the vast majority of them cannot perform to the male standard. This could be solved by changing the PT standards to be MOS specific instead of being based on sex and age, but gynocentrism dictates that we can't have nice things. wouldnt fix the…
/r/MensRights14/11/16 06:58 PM
2

well i dont mean like women have to be able to do as many push ups as men when i talk about expectations - i mean like if your going to put them into combat- put both equally- dont relegate females to safer jobs or anything like that.
/r/MensRights14/11/16 06:09 PM
1

And those with limited intelligence must become slaves to our country and their lives are forfeit. The alternative is a UBI and letting them go full idiocracy mode (watch the movie if you havent). unfortunately its either provide these low intellect people with a job in the military or let them sponge off of society. This does not solve that problem. This gives all of the disenfranchised weapons and combat tactics training. it creates a field of employment for people who otherwise wont be able t…
/r/MensRights14/11/16 06:05 PM
2

So, we only do this to the lower class? That's still horrible. No- it would only be for people not willing to pursue a higher education out of highschool- and to stop it from being unfair to the lower class, they would have the ability to go to school regardless of financial standing. part of the reason im suggesting this, is because the closer we get to fully automating the lower skill jobs in america, the less opportunity uneducated people are going to have, to the point where in fifty years t…
/r/MensRights14/11/16 05:16 PM
3

That being said, I would fight tooth and nail against forced service. Hmm- Would you be ok with it if the following stipulations happened? College bound students are exempt - As part of this, to prevent buying exemption- any student without means will be granted the ability to receive an education in times of war, these conscripts cannot be sent to battle- but can be used in an auxiliary function such as logistics and such. Interestingly enough, we currently have this (sort of). If a non-citizen…
/r/MensRights14/11/16 04:50 PM
7

eh. i cant speak objectively on this having served. the military definately changed me from a lazy do-nothing to a hard working man. While i do believe national conscription could have value, i'd only be interested in supporting it it if a few things happened Females and males were made to equally serve Females and males were held to the same expectations while conscripted the recompense was a full college level education after your conscription. Non-national citizens can go through the conscrip…
/r/MensRights14/11/16 02:22 PM
0

having votership, and having the ability to vote are distinctly seperate; saying they have 30% votership means only 30% of the 100% who could vote, actually placed a vote. again your ignorance of our legal system is showing.... at this point you're just flinging poo with no real objectives or arguments left to make, so i'll be exiting this pointless circlejerk you're trying to engage, and enjoying the rest of my night. Toodles.
/r/MensRights11/11/16 03:40 AM
0

oh... thats adorable... you think that individual votes count for anything beyond electing senate and house.... oh god... Christ thats adorable. i can cite you law that prevents women from being drafted, and prevents women as combatants in a time where Men were litterally 100% in control of house/senate Women had under 30% votership so yea. come back when you learn the basics of lawmaking and develop a modicum of common sense. Edit- and trying to feign some great shame on me because im not actin…
/r/MensRights10/11/16 09:54 PM
0

daily. do you? cite me law drafted by women that prevents them from being drafted. Cite me law drafted by women that prevents them from being military combatants. cite me law drafted by women that gives them any right prior to 1960 that men dont have.
/r/MensRights10/11/16 09:44 PM
0

You are an embarrassment to this sub. So no legitimate counter then? Glad to know you couldn't counter it. just wanted to be sure you were aware of the most basic of facts (because apparently you arent). only an ignorant man would ever try to even insinuate that this country in its current state wasnt built and maintained by men, and therefore responsible for everything that happens to it under their care. now that the balance is shifting and women do have a legitimate say in our congress- it ca…
/r/MensRights10/11/16 09:26 PM
0

I'm saying because men gave women the right to vote, you can no longer blame men alone for women not getting men's responsibilities. Period. oh, so when women wanted to serve in multiple wars, but were told that they couldn't serve as soldiers - only as administration and nurses, by their 99.99% male congress, and then were exempted from the draft by their 99.99% male congress, they should still be held responsible for the choices that men made yes? i think you fail to realize that there have be…
/r/MensRights10/11/16 09:10 PM
0

your argument has no logical basis. you are saying that because women wanted the right to vote, they should be responsible for the men who allowed them the right to vote for having not enforced the same standards upon them as were enforced upon men. That's like expecting a child who cant even talk yet to be responsible for their parents actions. i hope you can see the insanity in that expectation... The rest of your post is the same stupid debunked arguments feminists make. oh are they? news to …
/r/MensRights10/11/16 08:20 PM
0

Once men gave women the vote, it was no longer under men's exclusive control... right? ah, so you know that we've only had 31 female senators in us history right? did you also know that we've had about 2000 different senators in that time? Did you also know that prior to the year 2000 we only had 11 different female senators over the course of nearly 200 years of american history? cumulatively they have held about 0.01% of the house and senate seats for the entire history of the USA. only recent…
/r/MensRights10/11/16 07:01 PM
0

ah so the big feminist boogy man just went back in time and made all the men so terrified that they just gave women rights with none of the responsibilities or expectations right? come back when you can actually form a legitimate response, because all you've done so far is insist that women are these heinous creatures out to get you and that they some how magically had control over the enforcement of responsibilities and given rights in an era where it was still legal to beat your wife for shini…
/r/MensRights10/11/16 05:55 PM
0

i think you missed the point.... because what you've written here has nothing to do with the counter i delivered... its not inaccurate, it just has little to do with what was delivered.
/r/MensRights10/11/16 03:56 PM
0

Feminists have never wanted equality, they always wanted whatever men have but never considered giving what women have to men. i disagree on the grounds that in large, prior to the turn of the century, women have never had the power to give men anything. if men wanted what women had (in terms of rights), we could have taken it. the primary issue is that the collective view of men, is starting to shift back towards the center, and we are finally starting to realize "oh shit... why didn't we think…
/r/MensRights10/11/16 03:16 PM
0

i dont know how you could logically state that women were responsible for either of the outcomes of first and second feminisim, when during both decision points, men were exclusively in charge of making that decision. Did women ask for equal rights? Yes. Should women be in the draft? Absolutely. Did the men at the time have some skewed view that women were too delicate for war? Absolutely. did men create a state where women and men are separate but equal in certain things? Yes. Women asked for c…
/r/MensRights10/11/16 02:53 PM
1

by exempting white males from her apology, she is placing blame on us as if she thinks we are responsible for this perceived slight. E.G. a MASSIVE ammount of women, MEXICANS, and BLACKS, all voted for trump- and thats because they agreed with his stance.
/r/MensRights10/11/16 01:59 PM
0

First wave was about gaining mens rights, in which men refused to allow women, or discouraged them to take on those responsibilities (e.g. Holding a job and paying taxes) - which makes that a failing of men. Second wave was about gaining equality in those given rights that came as result of first wave (and some additional ones), of which several groups (both male and female) tried to intimidate and dissuade them from pursuing additional rights with threats of potentially being drafted into the V…
/r/MensRights10/11/16 01:57 PM
3

granted most dudes just dont go in for the kill right off the bat... its usually a hand on the thigh, or a hand on a breast, and it progresses untill its either stops or culminates.
/r/MensRights09/11/16 10:42 PM
6

hey now. lets not steal credit from those to whom credit is due. hillary was a terrible candidate without bastshit crazy women like this.
/r/MensRights09/11/16 08:19 PM
1

Username Checks out.
/r/MensRights09/11/16 08:16 PM
10

and thats insanity. it completely ruins the sexual experience for normal people. maybe for borderline mentally ill folks this is ok... but jfc man, as a vast majority women want men who are assertive and confident in everything they do; this includes sexy funtimes.
/r/MensRights09/11/16 08:02 PM
4

oh god how could i have made such an egregious mistake! ALL HAIL THE ONE TRUE GOD. THE ONCE AND FOREVER OVERLORD: EMPEROR TRUMP! MAY HIS GLORIOUS TANGERINE EFFULGENCE IMMURE US FOR ALL ETERNITY!
/r/MensRights09/11/16 07:59 PM
8

its highly likely that we will see a sharp uptick in the volatility of feminists over the next few years, so i wouldnt be surprised if it happened. i suggest keeping a rolled up news paper, a pointy finger, and a stern voice handy to discipline any feminists that go vigilante mode. "Smack No! Bad Feminist- Theres no such thing as white male privilege in this country. go sit in the corner".
/r/MensRights09/11/16 06:18 PM
18

"I just start kissing them, it's like a magnet. Just kiss. I don't even wait. And when you're a star they let you do it, you can do anything ... Grab them by the p*ssy. You can do anything." So what? he should wait for the girl to go "GRAB MY PUSSY DADDY TRUMP" during a make out session? sorry- news flash, but unless you are dealing with an extremely forward (and by extension Extremely rare) woman, that is not how the sexual exchange works. And you cant be expected to just stop mid make out sesh…
/r/MensRights09/11/16 06:14 PM
5

hillary did not loose because she was a woman. she lost because she was the lesser candidate. end of story. had she not conspired and stolen bernies nomination, we'd be chanting "PRAISE THE BERN" instead of "ALL HAIL OVERLORD TRUMP!".
/r/MensRights09/11/16 05:17 PM
36

over half of women voted for trump, but its still your fault men.
/r/MensRights09/11/16 05:15 PM
1

i disagree with karens assessment on many points, but i'm not arguing against her here. Karen has traditionally had a very regressive view of women in her stances- and not that shes wrong by merit of that, just that i feel her wellspring is a tad-bit befouled when it comes to discussing women in general. Further, understand that the above concept makes no sense. Groups don't gain equal rights -- societies do. This is completely false. Societies are the agency that ascribes equality- E.G. Seperat…
/r/MensRights09/11/16 03:48 PM
2

exactly.
/r/MensRights09/11/16 03:41 PM
4

im going to have to agree with /u/prodiver. First wave feminisim was about women gaining equal rights. Second wave feminisim was poisoned by some more extreme ideals, but still largely was about womens equality. Thirdwave has nothing to do with equality.
/r/MensRights09/11/16 02:12 PM
1

should be all good now :) i put your post back up.
/r/MensRights08/11/16 03:27 PM
1

check out my reply- theres some moderation action i had to take on your post. let me know when its fixed.
/r/MensRights08/11/16 03:25 PM
1

gotta remove your comment for a bit; you need to black out her face and name on your IM picture. let me know when you change it and ill reinstate the comment. we can have problems with some of our more.... zealous users tracking down people to harass them if they have too much information about a person- usually a clear face shot and a name are enough to find someone on the internet.
/r/MensRights08/11/16 03:21 PM
13

stop saying you love her. Cut her out of your heart. this is what manipulative women do. i wouldnt be saying this at all had she not come after you to pay for her bond. i personally understand that tempers flare, and sometimes physical altercations are inevitible- hell i even endorse a good old mutual beatdown on occasion (between equal genders mind you)- after the fact tho, that she came after you financially, and is trying to guilt you, its a clear indicator that you need to run for the hills.
/r/MensRights07/11/16 09:52 PM
38

walk away. dont give her the time of day. shes a fully grown adult, and deserves to lie in the bed she made. this is what that kind of woman potentially leads to (its mindboggling, but well worth watching it all. you see her go from adorable girl to psychopath to manipulator in no time at all): She hires a hitman to kill her husband - pays him a paltry 4200 to off him (secretly an undercover cop) She finds out he was "Murdered" Shes subsequently interviewed by the police (the 15 minute mark is m…
/r/MensRights07/11/16 08:26 PM
3

nothing to do with mens rights dude...
/r/MensRights07/11/16 08:17 PM

not a mens rights issue.
/r/MensRights07/11/16 08:15 PM
3

so lets get this straight Miraha went full blow hypergamy mode, and found a guy better than her current husband Left her current husband Got pissed when her new husband to be presented a preenup, and she wouldnt sign Got pissed when her husband to be didnt want her fuckboy around, because he didnt want to be a cuck... then she Demands to be compensated for an exorbitant value because she wouldnt do items 3 and 4 for her new husband and he called it off? this is literally the pinnacle of whathefu…
/r/MensRights07/11/16 06:04 PM
1

so this means as a sperm donor, i can relentlessly hunt down the woman my sperm was used to impregnate, and harass her, and demand that i be a part of the childs life right? no? So why does the opposite stand true? Men donate sperm, not to become fathers, but to give women the opportunity to become mothers, without the obligations of fatherhood. why should the logical means of "stay the fuck away from the donor/recipient" not apply?
/r/MensRights07/11/16 05:57 PM
1

hmm... i dont disagree, however i feel like it needs to be delivered in that context. we got rid of the WBB (Women behaving badly) Tag because it just turned into a circle jerk of women being trashy, and did nothing but promote the "fuck women" mentality we had floating around this sub for a long time. Its important to call out that much like the bottom of the barrel of male public faux pas not being indicative of the entire genders behavior, and rather a minority percentile; that the same argum…
/r/MensRights04/11/16 02:14 PM
3

if its in the lock it should still be visible, or at the very least have run out of the lock to some degree.
/r/MensRights03/11/16 01:58 PM
3

Elmers and other regular glues dry a clear blueish white or yellow. Superglue drys glass clear unless the surface was tacked up, then its grey.
/r/MensRights03/11/16 01:40 PM
24

Doug, whats the connection to MR on this item? generally we know women can behave like retards, but unless they were doing this in response to men, or to damage men, i struggle to see the connection
/r/MensRights03/11/16 01:16 PM
4

just a tip if it happens again- you can use a torch lighter to heat the lock to melt most glues. superglue only gets hard again so dont use it if its superglue.
/r/MensRights03/11/16 01:12 PM
1

to borrow an adage- 'not all women' demonize masculinity. this woman in particular makes some valid points. the pendulum has swung too far into the feminine, and we need to swing back to the masculine if we ever want to have things work out for us. there will always be incursors and evil in this world, and physically men generally are more suited towards a social protector role - something that has slowly been gutted and worn down by feminism. i hope the world does start to swing back, because a…
/r/MensRights02/11/16 07:02 PM
2

i cant help but feel the writer is reflecting her own perception of the world on this article. its not even a passable piece.
/r/MensRights02/11/16 06:44 PM
3

i think that the creative spark here was lost in lieu of pandering to social panic buttons/buzzword issues. not to mention based on the title illegal........
/r/MensRights02/11/16 06:39 PM
1

imagine if it was men doing it to men. I get the point is to show the double standard, but come on. this is just petty.
/r/MensRights02/11/16 06:27 PM
8

people dont transition for privilege. i'd highly recommend talking to some trans-gendered people about their decision.
/r/MensRights02/11/16 06:17 PM
7

And lo the good whoppi doth speak: "Dont anybody Hit anybody. Dont be suprised if you hit a man, and he hits you back. If you decide as a four foot three woman to put hands on a man who is six feet tall and doesnt want to deal with your shit, Dont be surprised when he hits you back. Dont Hit anybody." Words to live by ladies. Men understand that if they put hands on another man, they are getting hit back. its a conscious choice, with clear and defined repercussions. if you step into the mans rea…
/r/MensRights20/10/16 02:58 PM
1

i personally dont subscribe to the pejorative, and hate to see it used, just trying to be informative.
/r/MensRights19/10/16 07:27 PM
3

sentiments shared by the rest of the world.
/r/MensRights19/10/16 06:19 PM
8

psh i see it all the time. there was a flash mob of topless ripped dudes dancing last time i was there.
/r/MensRights19/10/16 06:19 PM
7

i havent seen any gigantic gaggles of topless hotties roaming the city. i feel jipped.
/r/MensRights19/10/16 06:09 PM
2

the neckbeard slur, isnt refering to facial hair on the neck. its refering to the sagging sack of fat some people get under their faces that looks like a "beard" hence neckbeard. its an insult usually flung at fat, socially awkward internet dwellers. check out /r/justneckbeardthings if you want to see some parodies/prime examplies.
/r/MensRights19/10/16 05:54 PM
4

its kind of true... the female figure has been one of the greatest inspirations for artists over the centuries. practically every major city has an exhibition featuring a plethora of naked women.
/r/MensRights19/10/16 05:44 PM
5

is it really?
/r/MensRights19/10/16 05:44 PM
5

is it sad i could hear the splatter as they thwacked into the ground?
/r/MensRights19/10/16 05:35 PM
1

austrialia, new zealand, canada, and several other places are on their way down the shit chute of feminisim, and pro-sjw mentalities. Canada and brittan already signed away their freedom of speech in the name of social justice. america will likely do the same thing if hillary takes office. youll see some campaign about "stop the hate speech" happen about a year or so into term, where she pushes for everyone to let the government regulate our speech, and criminalize anything that could be conside…
/r/MensRights19/10/16 05:06 PM
17

love it. guy provides citation and source, and logically discusses it, and they loose their shit over it instead of addressing it properly.
/r/MensRights11/10/16 06:36 PM
7

if your a white male its a double threat! double the discrimination allowed for maximum equality!
/r/MensRights07/10/16 07:16 PM
1

actually YES, that is exactly what equality means on the left.
/r/MensRights07/10/16 06:16 PM
16

i believe this was the couple that didnt want their boy growing up as a male?
/r/MensRights01/10/16 06:35 PM
4

his robo hand has a sick colorscheme.tho...
/r/MensRights21/09/16 05:27 PM
1

thats fucking beautiful, and a perfect representation of what the tumblur age thinks the world is.
/r/MensRights20/09/16 04:40 PM
1

and this is why i want to be a dad more than anything.
/r/MensRights19/09/16 02:10 PM
1

we arent comparable to 2xc. 2xc has absolutely No tolerance of male issues - while we are tolerant of female issues.
/r/MensRights19/09/16 01:46 PM
4

hold on guys, let me just manually modifiy the chemicals that naturally appear in my sperm.
/r/MensRights19/09/16 01:28 PM
1

its not much farther off than this tbh- there is a company, i forget the name, that has invested HEAVILY in artificial wombs. they claim they are about a decade or so from fully functional
/r/MensRights16/09/16 07:44 PM
5

just to chime in, prostate cancer is the number one leading cancer in the world (technically lung cancer is, but thats more of a self induced condition), but receives a fraction of what breast cancer does in terms of attention and research. the breast cancer foundations go through a lot of trouble to make sure that fact isnt spread arround. in terms of gender, males make up the majority of cancer victims. not everything is about gender. these boys prove that.
/r/MensRights13/09/16 11:37 PM
2

shame has nothing to do with it. i can name ten women who are not only better qualified candidates, but flat out better candidates in every area, and every single one of them would take my vote were they running in her place.
/r/MensRights10/09/16 02:02 AM
1

so because shes the first female candidate just throw logic and reason out the door because 'women deserve their time to shine'? In a world where every president was a woman for all of American history, are you telling me you wouldn't want to vote for the first male? I would. No actually i would not - i value logic and reason. Just like i didn't vote for obamma for being black. you put any other candidate that is suitably qualified, E.G. a former female military general, or someone who isn't out…
/r/MensRights09/09/16 06:57 PM
1

gender is irrelevant - anyone who thinks it is, and uses that as basis for choice, is a damn sexist. Hillary could have a twelve inch dick for all i care, and i still wouldn't vote for him because they he would be a horrible and ineffective leader irregardles of his/her gender.
/r/MensRights09/09/16 06:38 PM
2

dont get me wrong- we have points of inequality- its why the MRM exists. my point is that we are nearly equal- yes the scales are tipped slightly towards women in some cases. bringing trump in as president ensures those scales stay put. bringing hillary in, ensures everything goes to shit.
/r/MensRights09/09/16 06:10 PM
-3

with trump, the rights of men and women stay as they are. with hillary, the rights of men will be diminished, and the rights of women will be elevated. Our social dichotomy, in terms of gender, right now is very nearly perfectly equal in every regard. bringing Hillary to presidency will destroy that balance, and set social progress back by an ammount that's impossible to gauge.
/r/MensRights09/09/16 05:47 PM
17

On the Mod level: The decision was made (at least on my part), to allow things regarding Hillary to persist to some degree ever since she openly declared that she wanted a separate penal system for the female gender - Literally a gender apartheid.
/r/MensRights09/09/16 05:44 PM
1

those arent even in the same realm. Charisma is a HUGE part of an effective leader. having a vagina or a penis is not a factor of a candidate. if they put any well qualified, charismatic, and militarily versed leader on the ballot, and i wouldn't hesitate to vote for them REGARDLESS of their gender. if Margaret Woodward ran, i'd vote for her in a second - shes no politician thats for sure, but that woman is cast from the shit of legends when it comes to military and leadership skills. so yea- Vo…
/r/MensRights09/09/16 05:39 PM
3

because never in the history of the presidency has anyone ever voted for a candidate because he had a penis. they voted for him because of his politics, ability to lead, and charisma.
/r/MensRights09/09/16 05:33 PM
13

technically they could vote 96 years ago, and several states allowed women voting priviliges far before that. so yea, women could vote just about 100 years ago. hell several societies back in the greco-roman era allowed women the right to vote and participate in office.
/r/MensRights09/09/16 05:31 PM
1

the difference between hillary and trump for me hasnt expressed his intent to create a gender apartheid here in the states. hillary has. that very statement/stance of hers undermines the very principles on which our country should be opperating on.
/r/MensRights09/09/16 05:28 PM
16

God these report reasons are adorable :) 2: <no reason> 1: this subreddit is woman hating TRASH 1: like you fucks care about feminism 1: Threatening, harassing, or inciting violence 1: CTR is crazy on this thread. 1: joining the ranks of the_donald now huh? goodbye longtime favorite sub 1: Spam 1: Ever wonder why you call one candidate by his last name, and one by her first name? 1: there literally aren't any. 1: Absolutely retarded
/r/MensRights09/09/16 05:25 PM
1

Something you forgot to mention- is that some people men, women, boys and girls, can have, for lack of a better term, Prince charming syndrome. (the fairer sex is far more prone to this) Prince charming syndrome, for anyone not familiar with the term, is the condition in which primarly women and girls adopt the Hyper-quixotic views of men set forth for men within romance novels, stories,movies, and television dramas, that set forth unrealistic expectations of their partners. As result of these s…
/r/seduction30/08/16 02:44 PM
1

my only suggestion is that you don't engage her on the subject anymore. Some really good life advice: everyone you meet in life will have an opinion. the thing that separates adults from children, is the ability to accept that people don't always share your views, and that your views are not absolute. its ok to disagree with people, but don't disregard their stances just because they come from a standpoint that you don't agree with. if your mother is an important person in your life- you dont ha…
/r/MensRights30/08/16 02:16 PM
-1

Her main points were the constant objectification of women in the media (which she said was worse with women) Men are equally objectified. Sex sells to both sexes. its not some masterful scheme to keep the women down. and how catcalling happens so often No it doesnt Its america, i can say "leme get at that sweet sweet ass" to a man or woman in public and have broken no laws. deal with it. and the sex trafficking that's still going on and apparently nobody's outraged about it. People are plenty o…
/r/MensRights30/08/16 01:37 PM
1

You are yet to provide a singular logical reason as to why you completely fabricate statements out of thin air. Last i checked i'm not. Not once had I said that wearing makeup is bad - I said that it's trickery. Biological trickery. That's it. You must lack a grasp of the basics of english language if you cant understand that trickery is bad. Trickery has NEGATIVE connotations- therefore it is bad.
/r/MensRights25/08/16 07:18 PM
1

Removed for being a low effort shitpost.
/r/MensRights25/08/16 05:57 PM
1

but why is it tho? if you are fugly, no ammount of exercise will fix that- but make up sure as shit will. what is the big deal if they want to wear makeup to look better? your entire beef with this is unfounded and has yet to provide a singular logical reason as to why wearing makeup is bad.
/r/MensRights25/08/16 05:54 PM
1

i'm making a point that your argument has holes in it. you are saying that you cant paint on muscles, when in fact you can achieve a similar effect by supplementing yourself with steroids. Try to remain on topic. The point of it is- both putting on makeup, and improving your physique, are done for the same reasons with the same goals.
/r/MensRights25/08/16 05:39 PM
1

Tricking, yes. Manipulating? No. Getting jacked, as you and I have done, is different than makeup, as it can only be done one way - through hard work and discipline. You can't "paint" muscles onto your body. but i can take sterioids, and other things to help the process? i ask you what the difference really is- both are done to enhance self confidence, pride, and sexual attraction.
/r/MensRights25/08/16 05:24 PM
-2

in a global sense it is. this is only true because of the middle east, china and africa being cesspools of real gender inequalities. first world countries do not suffer from these same things.
/r/MensRights25/08/16 04:56 PM
1

i think it has less to do with us caring about how other people see us, and more to do with the concept of makeup on women being a mens rights issue as being fucking retarded. we shouldnt care in the slightest what women do with their bodies if its not impacting us. claiming "oh well they do this to manipulate men!" is stupid, and doesnt make it a mens rights issue. i went to the gym, got jacked. does that mean i am manipulating women?
/r/MensRights25/08/16 04:30 PM
1

there is no relevant context. its a troll user whos been permabanned trying to slip shit through.
/r/MensRights25/08/16 03:00 PM

quality post. top notch really. /s This was done to demonstrate how different makeup can make a person look. if you really care about women using makeup, then that's fine - but that doesn't make it a men's rights issue unless you consider women to only be worth their looks. this is the absolute definition of shitpost.
/r/MensRights25/08/16 02:58 PM
0

Removed for being a low effort image repost.
/r/MensRights24/08/16 04:40 PM
1

love the summary at the end 'dont date republicans' (paraphrased)
/r/MensRights23/08/16 01:06 PM
15

feminists arent doing anything about this- like i said, they are too busy blaming men, or looking for ways to be a bigger victim. all i see here in this article is black rights groups pointing out blatant bigotry and racisim- something that needs to be corrected in the police force in baltimore. i dont see the NOW there working on that, i dont see feminist figureheads pushing for change there- not a goddamn thing.
/r/MensRights22/08/16 06:47 PM
26

no, no its not. Anti-feminism is being against the ideas and notions of what has devolved from an important movement, to a cult like hate spewing pustule looking to attain maximum victimhood status and tell everyone else that their problems are someone elses fault. what was the last feminist argument you or any other feminist leveled, that didn't try to blame men for their problems? Feminism is anti-male, but men's rights is not anti female - we aren't here to blame women for our problems. were …
/r/MensRights22/08/16 02:55 PM
23

Men, in fact, do face a particular gendered set of challenges that are too often ignored in feminist conversations including unequal paternity leave, unfair custody arrangements, the lack of discussions around the rape of men, the disproportionate prevalence of suicide among men, and the repressive nature of masculinity as a cultural force. But Men's Rights Activists, who could have rallied around these important issues for progressive purposes, have instead decided that their goal should be to …
/r/MensRights22/08/16 01:57 PM
1

no, its just the stupid google spellcheck keeps correcting advocation because it thinks its not a word.
/r/MensRights22/08/16 12:48 PM
1

thats perfectly fine to wish that. you arent wishing an act of violence on her- theres a big difference.
/r/MensRights20/08/16 10:28 PM
1

i'm not going to sit here and play mental gymnastics with you on this. there is no shred of logic that you could furnish that would make a modicum of sense in this situation. i suggest you read up on mob psychology if you cant comprehend why letting a gigantic mob of people go "OMG SHE NEEDS TO BE RAPED" or "MAN I WISH SHE WOULD GET RAPED" is a very bad thing. it is all the encouragement some dumb sack of shit will need to go "damn ima go do this cause everyone says its a good idea". people are …
/r/MensRights20/08/16 10:23 PM
1

Encourages or incites violence encoraging, or advocation, of violence is prohibited. you bring me an admin statement that says we can allow those comments and i'll gladly conceed the point. the fact of the matter however is that wishing something would happen to some one in a public forum IS encoraging others who feel the same way to do so. rape is bad. its not ok, and its not a fitting punishment. saying it should be used on her because it would have happened to the guy she lied about, doesnt m…
/r/MensRights20/08/16 04:27 PM
1

orrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr the rules of reddit prohibit advocating for violence and im merely enforcing that rule.
/r/MensRights20/08/16 01:15 PM
9

it shouldn't surprise you. feminists control the vast majority of our education system.
/r/MensRights20/08/16 01:11 AM
3

i believe that cathrine commins actually said it.
/r/MensRights19/08/16 08:42 PM
1

its nothing like that. be as vile, foul and repugnant as you like. talk about whatever falls within the meets and bounds of mens rights. the standard rules of reddit still apply- you cant advocate for violence or anything else like that period. if i dont remove it, or an admin sees it, you can kiss your account goodbye.
/r/MensRights19/08/16 06:55 PM
4

you have to understand that when hot topics like this happen, (especially one of this monumental level of social progress for Mens rights), people say things they dont truly mean, or say them comically. were this any other instance or everyday happenstance, it would be met with a permanent ban.
/r/MensRights19/08/16 06:52 PM
2

we have a massive influx of people who arent standard sub users today- we have about a 500% uptic in views and visits right now since this hit front page, so a lot of them are unfamiliar with the mod/sub/reddit policy on this.
/r/MensRights19/08/16 04:17 PM
5

brow seriously, those things are offensive... i dont blame you at all :P
/r/MensRights19/08/16 04:16 PM
8

there's an important distinction to be made that i think you are glossing over: a False claim is distinctly separate from a unsubstantiated claim. a false claim can only occur when there is evidence that the claimant conspired or intentionally falsified their statements, an unsubstantiated claim occurs any time there is insufficient evidence to support or debase their claim. There is a very specific portion of the law in play here, and that is the mens rea - aka the criminal intent. women wont m…
/r/MensRights19/08/16 04:09 PM
2

there should be only one. i could be misquoting the occurrence rate. its been a good year since i delved into it.
/r/MensRights19/08/16 03:58 PM
3

yep, and thats what the lisak paper did to water down the rate to 1% as an attempt at dismissing the issue.
/r/MensRights19/08/16 03:36 PM
3

there's a huge difference in "i hope she gets everything coming to her" and "i hope she gets raped." the first comment expresses the inevitability of her going to prison, the second expresses the hope that violence happens to her.
/r/MensRights19/08/16 03:29 PM
3

its a sentiment i certainly share.
/r/MensRights19/08/16 03:21 PM
1

its likely SRS or AMR types. its nothing we dont deal with as a mod team on a daily basis.
/r/MensRights19/08/16 03:21 PM
2

i'm saying that they should either not be counted, or if they want to count them, at least divide their values between the two categories based on the existing rates. the fact is that about 65% of all claims dont have enough evidence to persecute as false or substantiated- the larger fact is that presumably the majority of all false claims go ignored by the police, as in they aren't recorded or reported as false- this is the extremely rare circumstance (the first ive ever heard of) where a false…
/r/MensRights19/08/16 03:18 PM
7

we are not a safe space. be as vile and repugnant as you want. we however cant allow avocation of violence - its one of the big reddit rules we have to follow.
/r/MensRights19/08/16 03:06 PM
63

i believe a feminist once said " men can even benefit from the experience of being incarcerated from a false claim"
/r/MensRights19/08/16 03:03 PM
2

go read up on the lisak paper; when you carve out the claims that didnt have evidence to support it being falsified and substantiated, it comes out way different (instead of 8 false claims vs 37 substantiated and 80 indeterminate). the proper assumption is that those cases if enough evidence was presented, would have followed the established paradigm of cases that did have enough evidence presented. if you either remove those from the equation or allot them based on the existing rate established…
/r/MensRights19/08/16 02:57 PM
1

yea thats totally it. I am the moderator of 💩 hear me roar! Feel my mighty banning power. /s Thank you for the input, but we have specific rules and they will be enforced regardless of the disdain or outcry.
/r/MensRights19/08/16 02:38 PM
29

thats fine :) reddit policy states that we cant allow the avocation of violence - and rape is considered a violent act. terrible eyebrows are not protected under this rule.
/r/MensRights19/08/16 02:30 PM
2

its called setting a fair expectation. if you came in her wanting to crack a joke about it, and i just banned you out of nowhere, you'd be upset. this way, they have the recourse to still make the joke if they want to, but have the expectation of what will happen if they do.
/r/MensRights19/08/16 02:13 PM
4

It's not about winning or losing, in the end more men are raping women than women raping men But thats not the issue at hand. the issue was that this is uniquely an issue that only impacts men - you dont see men falsely accusing women of rape as a form of revenge or punishment. the issue is that the tendency to believe a rape claimant far outpowers the tendencey that the defendant will be believed.
/r/MensRights19/08/16 02:10 PM
4

feelings tend to run high in these situations, so i'd rather not ban someone forever for popping off unless its absolutely warranted.
/r/MensRights19/08/16 02:06 PM
1

you know that means 1 in 5 cases with enough evidence to persecute someone either way, are falsified then right? that is INSANELY frequent. That's why its so huge. this isn't revenge porn feelgood crap- this is the exuberant extolling of a court ruling that impacts the futures of an entire gender. its giving peace of mind, finally knowing that this injustice is on the brink of being purged from society. this is a HUMONGOUS win for the MRM.
/r/MensRights19/08/16 01:49 PM
14

because it advocates for a very specific type of violence to be inflicted on someone- which violates the rules of reddit, and the rules of this sub. if someone were to go into graphic detail about the things they were going to do to your rectum before murdering you, you can bet your ass we would remove and ban them.
/r/MensRights19/08/16 01:44 PM
4

i think what you've failed to understand is that false reports ARE prevalent in society. the lisak paper that feminists love to quote as the 1-2% false claim statistic was full of conflated data which specifically lowered the rates by a significant ammount. once you carve out that bulk, the false claim rate is over 20%. The reason this case is so instrumental is that it shows the courts are not only able but willing to persecute claimants that intentionally falsify allegations against someone.
/r/MensRights19/08/16 01:33 PM
26

on a more comical note- Here are some of the Report commentary on this post: "triggered Faggot™ le SJW XD 🚾🚾" "False rape accusations are almost never a thing, your "problems" are invented for attention" its obvious that SRS or some other sub has decided to invade with downvotes and such. i'm totally jacking that shitter icon for my mod title.
/r/MensRights19/08/16 01:24 PM
36

theres the element of intent to consider. if it can be proven that the "victim" lied with the intent to get them incarcerated, then there should be a clear cut punishment there.
/r/MensRights19/08/16 01:08 PM

This is the only warning anyone in this thread will be given: If you decide its funny, or necessary to say things along the lines of "I hope she gets raped" your comments will be removed, and you will be temporarily banned. If you think your commentary was interpreted wrong, please reach out to me via modmail. We aren't here to advocate for people getting raped. We're here to stop the circumstances that lead to that rape. Be better than that people.
/r/MensRights19/08/16 01:06 PM
1

yea acute bronchitis is almost universally viral or fungal (where chronic is usually due to smoking or some other environmental cause), and that weakens your immune system enough that pneumonia, which is bacterial, can set in- which is extremely hard to get rid of without antibiotics.
/r/MensRights18/08/16 10:05 PM
1

They arent, but since their mod team already killed the post theres no point in enforcing this rule. plus /r/funny is a default- that would be like enforcing it on /r/news.
/r/MensRights18/08/16 07:28 PM
2

I think you've got it backwards- acute Bronchitis, which most people get, can potentially progress to pneumonia if left unchecked (sauce: experience) I've had craptacular respiratory health since i was a kid so its nothing im not used to. its the same old bacterial pneumonia ive gottena million and one times, a week on whatever random -cillin drug the doctor gave me and i'll be back to normal. Thanks for the concern tho
/r/MensRights18/08/16 07:26 PM
4

you dont have to; its fine to leave it up because its a good example of social issues. just pointing this out so people dont go giving the /r/funny guys hate over this.
/r/MensRights18/08/16 05:47 PM
2

i was reaching out to the smaller figures first (specifically shoe, and a few others) with no luck. Silly got some traction with shoe, and we got that one to kick off and perform. we wanted to be sure we can handle this with a few guinea pigs before we start pushing on bigger figures. im pneumonia ridden right now and not in much shape to be harrassing people for this. check back in a week or so for an update.
/r/MensRights18/08/16 05:44 PM
4

Worth noting that the /r/funny moderators removed it.
/r/MensRights18/08/16 05:35 PM
1

Cue standard outcry about censorship. Remember our standard rules that no conservative/right wing opinions are allowed because we're a bunch of leftist communists. /s (Yes, that is the sarcasm symbol.) you forgot about how were secretly feminists working for the fempire. /s.
/r/MensRights18/08/16 02:18 PM
4

id definately have to side on the mod decision made here; this would take hours to properly read, check up, and rebut. Sending it to one of her social media accounts would be a FAR better method for getting any kind of feedback on this.
/r/MensRights16/08/16 01:09 PM
2

Charisma save actually.
/r/MensRights16/08/16 12:58 PM
2

i say.... have you not heard?
/r/MensRights15/08/16 04:38 PM
5

it was pretty fun (lil sad my Q didnt get an A); she was a trooper and slugged through three hours of questions and answered the vast majority of them.
/r/MensRights15/08/16 02:28 PM
3

i usually do Jalapenos pineapple and either canadian bacon or peoperoni depending on who else is grubbing on it. or i'll do jalapenos and anchovies <3
/r/MensRights12/08/16 11:27 PM
1

yes. all the yes. there is not enough to quantifiy the levels of yes that needs to happen here.
/r/MensRights12/08/16 11:24 PM
1

i'd be interested in that too :P
/r/MensRights12/08/16 11:22 PM
8

My questions: Where do you stand on alimony reform laws, and the NOW's active stance in blocking these reforms? Where do you stand on 50/50 child custody & Child support law? lastly: Feelings on unbridled, uncurtailed, unmoderated free speech?
/r/MensRights12/08/16 11:18 PM
1

i'm genuinely curious on this myself
/r/MensRights12/08/16 11:09 PM
9

Pineapple is the superior pizza topping you pleb.
/r/MensRights12/08/16 11:08 PM
35

i wish this was a problem more people in general had.
/r/MensRights12/08/16 11:06 PM
5

She clearly knows what the superior pizza topping is.
/r/MensRights12/08/16 10:53 PM

you wouldnt believe the shit people would do to shut this sub down.
/r/MensRights12/08/16 09:50 PM

popular youtuber focusing on anti-feminisim, and occasionally mens rights; her Chanel link is up top.
/r/MensRights12/08/16 08:06 PM

yes you may. it would be rude to, but we arent here to stop rudeness or police tone. if its a valid question that doesnt breach the basic rules of reddit, it is allowed.
/r/MensRights12/08/16 06:58 PM
1

Removed under crosslinking rule Also OP, ask yourself what this achieves? we all know that most feminists operate under the delusion that there is such a thing as male privlege; if you want to repost it as just a link to the below link thats fine- but the editorialized title doesnt really do much. https://np.reddit.com/r/AskReddit/comments/4xcwsg/girls_of_reddit_what_do_you_think_is_the_best/
/r/MensRights12/08/16 06:41 PM

you dont have to worry about that here. again as long as you follow the basic rules of reddit, and the rules in the sub, then were all good.
/r/MensRights12/08/16 06:18 PM

Removing under the Meme rule. this is a low effort meme thats been reposted a million times, and is just karma whoring.
/r/MensRights12/08/16 04:36 PM
0

what are your views of the post crash? as with all things that are sick, you have to get worse before it gets better- i'm of the mindset that we might have to go through some tough times to correct the underlying issues before we can move forward again. Much like in the mortgage business, we just went through a massive "worse" period, and now were working through the "getting better" process with the implementations of the NMS, the creation of the CFPB and all of the new regulations that came as…
/r/MensRights12/08/16 02:43 PM
0

i dont find myself agreeing with many people on politics, but bernie getting cheated out of the nomination hurt everyone. i earnestly believe that he would have beaten trump in the polls, because "why not trump"- i do however believe that trump is a much stronger leader than all three candidates and will get us financially back on track. i dont agree with his illegal immigrants plan 100%, but i do agree with extricating the american economy of all of the illegal immigrants, and bringing producti…
/r/MensRights12/08/16 02:23 PM
2

This isnt real; locking this thread- cant be having a discussion about fake things.
/r/MensRights12/08/16 01:44 PM
1

i can confirm this. i was a /B/Tard for many years.
/r/MensRights12/08/16 01:03 PM
4

yes its fair that they are both being tried equally, but the law its self is incorrect. its a piece of archaic legislation that should be revised. i previously bought up my thoughts on this in another thread According to this article the son was given up for adoption when he was born (she was 16), and the mother had no contact with her son until he was 18- legally an adult; there is no forcing or coercion in this instance. while i think incest is grotesque, i am not ignorant of peoples feelings.…
/r/MensRights12/08/16 12:52 PM
1

Banned user- Nuked Post for violating his ban.
/r/MensRights11/08/16 05:40 PM
1

Banned user- Nuked Post for violating his ban.
/r/MensRights11/08/16 05:40 PM
1

Banned user- Nuked Post for violating his ban.
/r/MensRights11/08/16 05:40 PM
1

Banned user- Nuked Post for violating his ban.
/r/MensRights11/08/16 05:40 PM

Come on guys; grow up. dont pull petty squabbling bullshit. Locking this thread since its turned into a cesspool. .
/r/MensRights11/08/16 05:05 PM
1

Funny but not a mens rights issue. go post to /r/funny or something. Removed for off topic.
/r/MensRights11/08/16 04:20 PM

Removed for: Not a mens rights issue. there is no available recourse for this post to be submitted. it is dangerously close to advocacy for child sexual relations and that is forbidden by the rules of reddit, and the rules of this sub.
/r/MensRights10/08/16 05:25 PM
1

god... this is sad and funny at the same time... i dont know how to feel about this.
/r/MensRights10/08/16 05:22 PM
1

if you want me to cite something that is taught in High school biology, or basic animal husbandry, then sure... but i suggest that you go take a gander through a highschoolers biology book if you dont know how dominant and recessive genes work.... basically the primary issue with inbreeding is that the defective recessive traits have a higher chance of emerging the more you do it. if shes not a carrier for defective traits, in theory she could produce offspring with her Sons, sons, sons, son and…
/r/MensRights10/08/16 04:30 PM
1

its connection is tenuous at best. its being left alone for the risk of avoiding controversy among the user base. As to why: it was clearly a movie built to pander to feminism, and Anti-Feminism is sadly largely ingrained into the MRM as a result of us constantly having to defend ourselves against the allegations of feminism as a whole.
/r/MensRights10/08/16 03:10 PM
1

its hilarious because we arent even removing your posts. the userbase is. keep trying tho you poor deluded sap.
/r/MensRights10/08/16 02:56 PM
1

actually its not much higher than if she bred with someone else. for incestuous procreation, the emergence of recessive genetic flaws generally will have a slightly higher chance of emerging. its not until three to five generations of incestuous breeding that these defects will start to manifest with a 20-30% chance, with each generation having a significantly higher rate of occurrence beyond that.
/r/MensRights10/08/16 01:06 PM
1

huh. agreeing with each other, and on such a sticky subject... am i having a stroke? brb i smell toast...
/r/MensRights10/08/16 12:09 AM
1

it happens occasionally, the reddit admins will come in and assassinate a post for no reason.
/r/MensRights09/08/16 08:51 PM
1

Removed for What does this even have to do with mens rights >_>;;
/r/MensRights09/08/16 08:08 PM
4

Reddit admins seem to have killed this comment. i dont know why; just be clear that this was not the mod teams doing. i pushed it through, hopefully it stays.
/r/MensRights09/08/16 08:06 PM
2

More likely there was a disadvantage to females being larger which had nothing to do with intersex conflict. hey, dont get me wrong, if you can provde a logical alternative, i will always consider it. im not purporting this as fact- simply that it makes sense. if you have a larger mate that is capable of forcing its dna to be passed on because it selectively bred with a smaller mate that could be forced into it, then you would continue the cycle where males are born large and females are born sm…
/r/MensRights09/08/16 07:41 PM
10

i disagree OP. According to this article the son was given up for adoption when he was born (she was 16), and the mother had no contact with her son until he was 18- legally an adult; there is no forcing or coercion in this instance. while i think incest is grotesque, i am not ignorant of peoples feelings. if they are truly in love with each other and are consenting to sexual activity between each other, then there is absolutely zero reason why there should be legal action taken against them. i …
/r/MensRights09/08/16 07:32 PM
1

Removed for being previously banned.
/r/MensRights09/08/16 07:22 PM
2

my explanation hinges on the fact that while males get bigger considering competitive breeding, our females have gotten smaller in comparison to other hominids which are fairly monomorphic in terms of body size. the logical explanation for this is our specific breed of hominid utilized a specific mating pattern that encouraged males to get larger, and females to get smaller- which is a reversal of non-primate species where the male often times is the diminutive counterpart, as females being larg…
/r/MensRights09/08/16 07:21 PM
1

all good mate
/r/MensRights09/08/16 04:25 PM

Removed for crosslinking. you can resubmit using the NP link below https://np.reddit.com/r/TwoXChromosomes/comments/4wuajz/i_was_fired_because_of_other_womens_insecurities/
/r/MensRights09/08/16 04:17 PM
2

no, that's not what i'm implying. you seem to think that primitive hominids were capable of contemplating or understanding the moral implications of rape, or even capable of the concept of consent. rape or consent are a product of conscious thought and choice; in this sense its simply mating. self awareness didn't arise in early hominids until a mere 50,000-60,000 years ago, with the advent of the Cro-Magnon - well after we had evolved the majority of our body type. instead you just saw the word…
/r/MensRights09/08/16 04:02 PM

You are permanently banned from ALL of reddit, not just the /r/mensrights sub. you are evading that ban, and we are killing your posts on that principle. there's no gigantic moderator conspiracy to censor you or other people, or to censor unpopular views. deal with it.
/r/MensRights09/08/16 03:44 PM
5

the meme isnt wrong. it doesnt say what it takes to be a good partner. just what it takes to be "attractive".
/r/MensRights09/08/16 02:35 PM
1

Thats irrelevant - they didnt provide this information themselves in this subreddit, therefore we cant allow it. we have had too many incidences where something incendiary or inciteful has been said on face book, linked to reddit, and then reddit brigades the f out of them. its not allowed at all. your options are extremely cut and dry in this situation. Censor out the photo and name of the FB user Ignore me and let your post stay removed.
/r/MensRights09/08/16 02:27 PM
-2

id argue the contrary, that it wasnt the progenitrixies who selected their partners, but the progenitors who where powerful enough to overpower them, and ensure that their dna was passed on. if you think about it, most species dont have very disparate dimorphisim, and the female is about the same size as the male, or is larger in almost every species on our planet. we are one of the few species where the female is distinctly smaller and weaker than the male, and the logic behind this is, that th…
/r/MensRights09/08/16 02:22 PM
1

i see a name and a photo; Kat blaque at the top.
/r/MensRights09/08/16 02:02 PM
0

post is temporarily removed; censor the name on FB and i can let it back through; cant have people seeing this and then looking them up to harrass them.
/r/MensRights09/08/16 01:55 PM
1

sorry for the spam, its just that if i dont make these replies as visible as possible, people get the wrong idea.
/r/MensRights09/08/16 01:53 PM
2

the one he screenshotted was removed by the automod, for recieving a number of reports, the same number of reports as fake accounts i've banned today- it was likely him manufacturing removals against himself to rabble rouse. This one was removed because we've identified that he is the same person who has been evading a permanent reddit wide (not sub- all of reddit) ban.
/r/MensRights09/08/16 01:35 PM

Removed for evading Ban.
/r/MensRights09/08/16 01:31 PM

Removed for evading ban.
/r/MensRights09/08/16 01:28 PM
2

no, you wont be banned for that. voicing dissatisfaction is perfectly fine, however this user is a permanently banned user evading his ban, so any time we see him doing this, he is rebanned and his post history is nuked.
/r/MensRights09/08/16 01:27 PM
1

OP Was not removed for his commentary. he was removed because he is a persistent troll who is evading bans. his posts are removed because hes not allowed to even post at all.
/r/MensRights09/08/16 01:25 PM
2

This was not removed for its content. the OP is a permanently banned troll with a vendetta against the moderation team who keeps spamming alternate accounts to fish for "OH MY GOD THEYRE CENSORING ME PAW" posts. he recieved his initial ban for inciting violence against women, and has since gone to spamming alts via VPN to avoid his permanent reddit ban (yes hes banned reddit wide).
/r/MensRights09/08/16 01:24 PM
2

dont worry. we give reasons for removals. see my other reply above.
/r/MensRights09/08/16 01:22 PM
2

no. we are not banning for negative messages. this person has a permanent ban, and they keep spinning new user accounts to evade the banning efforts. Hes doing nothing more than rabble rousing. He abused the report system to have automod remove his post, so he could have more anti-mod bait as "ERMERGERD CENSORSHIPPPPPPPPPPPP"
/r/MensRights09/08/16 01:21 PM

These posts are removed via 2 routes- 1 you were massively reported, and 2 you are evading a PERMANENT ban from the sub reddit- even if you werent removed by the reports, we would remove you for breaking the rules of reddit.
/r/MensRights09/08/16 01:19 PM
1

this guy is someone who is evading a ban, so we remove his posts because he shouldnt be posting here period. he could post about the holy grail of MRM issues and we will still kill it on principle.
/r/MensRights09/08/16 01:17 PM
1

Real pimps dont get their hands dirty... unless its time to smackahoe. they have other dudes for that.
/r/MensRights08/08/16 04:27 PM
1

Duh. To Catch them is my real test, To train them is my cause!
/r/MensRights08/08/16 04:24 PM
1

seems fair to me. so long as it comes out of their existing sick leave, and they aren't given extra sickleave cuz vageen.
/r/MensRights08/08/16 04:22 PM
1

there is also evidence of procedural misconduct and wrongdoing by the prosecution such as withholding exculplatory evidence and other things. my money is on that he diddled someones daughter who has enough money and power to ensure this kids life is fucked as possible
/r/MensRights08/08/16 04:12 PM
4

definitely one of milos finer moments when debating something.
/r/MensRights08/08/16 04:00 PM
8

The response has been predictable. Of course millennials don’t have sex, they’re far too busy catching Pokémon, or sharing selfies on Snapchat. But I don’t think this is a laughing matter. There has been so much hysterical handwringing about how damaged and deviant we would become as the first generation to grow up with porn in our pockets. Collectively we’re still very anxious about the “sexting epidemic”. Of course it’s worrying that children are pressing each other to send sexually explicit i…
/r/MensRights05/08/16 06:56 PM
5

“It’s disturbing and troubling to see Title IX invoked in this manner,” said Lisa Schwartzman, associate chair and graduate program director of MSU’s philosophy department. “The Women’s Lounge is the one women-only space on campus. The claim that its very existence denies men access to an equal education is absurd.” careful lady, that double edged sword stings a bit. the point is you cant use MALE tax dollars to exclude men from accessing something they are paying for. its a simple fucking conce…
/r/MensRights02/08/16 03:55 AM
2

you act like they even use facts, and dont just pull stats out of their asses....
/r/MensRights28/07/16 08:58 PM
1

throw your votes at a third party if nothing else.
/r/MensRights24/07/16 04:57 AM
1

psh they should have gone full blown kilt mode.
/r/MensRights22/07/16 03:17 PM
6

funny story actually, the U shaped toilet bowls, the ones where your dick doesnt smack arround on the inside of the bowl, were made for women, because a feminist organization complained about round bowls creating unsafe wiping conditions. tl/dr: round bowls were made to save space, u bowls were made because of feminisim. its the only good think i can think of that feminisim has ever done for me.
/r/MensRights18/07/16 04:30 PM
1

it will be a FROSTY day in hell before hillary ever abandons her pro feminisim campaign.
/r/MensRights18/07/16 01:17 PM
0

it should be fine so long as our laws stipulate that the act will go unpunished if done outside of america.
/r/MensRights15/07/16 01:51 PM
2

the ACLU is full of shit. you cant force any private clubs or organizations to change its membership requirements on race or gender for anything beyond employment.
/r/MensRights15/07/16 01:20 PM
0

i say "god what a vagina" all the time. Im all for the progressive use of derogatory terms >:) ALL THE MORE TO HATE YOU WITH! KEKEKEKEKEKEKEKEK
/r/MensRights15/07/16 01:15 PM
1

the primary motivator of the human condition is reproduction. wanting to have sex with someone is a perfectly normal response to interactions with people. if you meet someone, and feel sexually attracted to them, it is ok to act on that. there is no magical length of time that someone should have to wait to engage in sexual activity with a person they share a mutual attraction with. many women are brainwashed from birth that sex is some kind of stigmatic action that is reprehensible and should b…
/r/MensRights14/07/16 04:46 PM

the issue isnt that black people are dying to cops, its that black people are dying to cops at a rate grossly disproportionate to the demographics. in all honesty, there should only be roughly one black person shot for every three white people shot based on the density of african americans to caucasians (we litterally outnumber them 3 to 1), yet we have them dying in a 1:1 ratio to police violence. this either means that blacks are three times as likely to be criminals, or police are employing b…
/r/MensRights12/07/16 06:10 PM
5

judging by the wiki summary... it seems like it.
/r/MensRights12/07/16 05:57 PM
5

oh i never knew that even existed >_>
/r/MensRights12/07/16 05:53 PM
9

wait, what? pursuit of happiness? that wasnt a scifi..... if anything that was an exemplary paternal example of a father who has nothing, and does everything to give his child something.
/r/MensRights12/07/16 05:46 PM
14

flagging NSFW- hes got porn ads.
/r/MensRights12/07/16 05:40 PM

have you not been watching the news? a handful of them yes, were criminals perpetuating crimes, those are not the people rousing the rabble. the rabble is being roused over the INNOCENT ones, the ones who have committed no crime, the ones who did nothing wrong, that this discussion is over.
/r/MensRights12/07/16 05:36 PM

i think its important to point out that a metric fuckton of "black criminals", are criminals by design. what i mean by this, is that our society, in its more racially motivated days, created laws that would specifically disadvantage the black community, making it far simpler for them to be labeled as criminals. its also important to point out, that the majority of black cop casualties are unarmed or non-threats on the police force assessments. Nobody in their right mind is going to complain that…
/r/MensRights12/07/16 05:09 PM

There are definitely interesections due to the vast majority of police brutality being inflicted on black MEN. a more factual statement would be that, men as a whole are brutalized/murdered by a VAST majority - and that makes it a mens rights issue. in terms of actual offenses, white males are killed/beaten more than black men are (by an extremely small margin). the issue however is the ratio of brutalization to population density- there are effectively 3 white men for every one black man in ame…
/r/MensRights12/07/16 05:01 PM

i think its important to recognize, that a mens rights issue, at times are caused by men- its not always caused by feminists that are out to get us. E.G. Women didnt draft alimony or CS law, men did that (but feminism certainly fighting to keep it in place). essentially once you strip away the racial factor, at it's core, we have an epidemic of cops killing men- and that IS a mens rights issue. my concern is that if we strip it down to simply a mens rights issue, are we damaging and alienating o…
/r/MensRights12/07/16 04:43 PM
3

its something I've explained before when i sourced this statistic men have roughly HALF the exposure to children, once you correct for this, the statistic is far closer to 50/50 (while still slightly lopsided with mothers being primary abusers of children- roughly 55/45). what his statistics fail to address is joint abuse, where both mother and father are abusers. the rough stats are something along the lines of if memory serves the rough statistics were along the line of: 20% of all children ar…
/r/MensRights12/07/16 02:56 PM
1

these came from the 2010 FBI statistics for crime, but the racial distribution is 2015.
/r/MensRights12/07/16 01:27 AM
37

there is NO way this is legitimate. if we have police shoving plastic tubes up peoples penises, we have a HUGE problem.
/r/MensRights11/07/16 08:21 PM
3

well thats fucking heartbreaking. for anyone unfamiliar with "no fault divorce", you can simply state "i dont love him anymore", and walk out with half of his property. he could have been perfectly nice, faithful, and the perfect husband, and you can litterally walk away with half of his life.
/r/MensRights11/07/16 08:12 PM
2

read the paper she gives you, theres no sense in blinding yourself to what the opposition says; if you do that you are no better than her. the paper i just linked is about as close as were getting to putting this to bed. it proves there is a gap, just a very small one, that can further be explained away by personal choice. also if she wants to cite the age of the paper as debasing, point out that things have been getting better in terms of wage, not worse, and that would only strengthen the pape…
/r/MensRights11/07/16 08:05 PM

Speaking officially: While we recognize that there are MRM issue undertones to the BLM Standpoint- We are distinctly separate from them. Murder and police deaths have ALWAYS been a huge issue for men, overwhelmingly so- however this is NOT a forum for fighting RACIAL issues. posts about Police violence , and police killing men are acceptable- but placing a racial spin on them is not. if a posts theme is solely about racisim it will be removed. as an aside: have some statistics! USA Racial distri…
/r/MensRights11/07/16 07:54 PM
2

oh you can simply counter back that the .77 on the dollar research paper doesn't meet her standards of proof, so why should the counter proof be required to do so? her stance is on par with " well because i said so, and until god tells me im wrong, im right". the research more so ever comes from a FEMINIST oriented study - its not a peer reviewed research paper, and has been proven to engage in conflation and manipulation of data. this is probably the closest we will get to correct for the time …
/r/MensRights11/07/16 07:46 PM
1

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/wiki/faq#wiki_2._what_is_the_.2Fr.2Fmensrights_perspective_on_the_wage_gap.3F try looking at these.
/r/MensRights11/07/16 07:12 PM
2

i get what your saying, but its impossible to flesh it out adequately in as few words as i used. the stipulation- permanently disabled, usually suffices, as those are disabilities classified as ones that cannot be overcome through medication or therapy. the idea is that they have to be truly incapable of earning a wage to qualify.
/r/MensRights11/07/16 06:46 PM
3

so you are faithfully married to your wife for the last decade, you turn 30, and boom you get maimed while deployed and come home a cripple. you now cant do anything, you can hardly get yourself to the toilet, you can hardly feel anything from your mid chest down. that means you cant tell when you have to defecate, urinate, and wind up just pissing and shitting on yourself most days. your so messed up that you cant even wipe yourself without having to struggle to do so, and your young child has …
/r/MensRights11/07/16 06:23 PM
3

not to spark the whole pedopriest issue back up, but i hope this sheds some light to people just how damaging these things can be to young boys.
/r/MensRights11/07/16 06:04 PM
2

dont be. DA is still pursuing the case, which in of itself is a fucking embarassment to the entire legal system.
/r/MensRights11/07/16 05:41 PM
1

nah they are going to continue with the prosecution. it appears that the exculpatory evidence only removed a portion of the accusers. while its obvious they are ALL lying, they can only prove that a few were, and the rest can have their testimony stand, which he will probably still get locked up on.
/r/MensRights11/07/16 05:40 PM
4

Specifically, if i were a candidate, and my focus was egalitarianism- these would be my focal points For Men Push for Federally mandated Alimony Standards Qualifiers Yes No Did the marriage result in Birthed or mutually adopted Children Alimony awarded Alimony not awarded Does Primary care spouse have a 2 year degree equivalent or higher Alimony Term = 6 years Minus total Years of college Completed (minimum of 1 year) Alimony Term = 4-6 years at judges discretion(maximum of 6 years) Did Primary …
/r/MensRights11/07/16 04:12 PM
2

so wait. let me get this straight, i dont want to crack open a fresh can of indignation and rage unless this is legitimate. Are you telling me that in Illinois, all a mother has to do is say "he raped me", and file a police report, and have legal grounds to then divest the father of ANY paternal rights? WITHOUT a conviction? by this legal verbiage provided, all the mother literally has to do is say 'it wasnt consensual' and boom, hes no longer a father, but likely still required to pay child sup…
/r/MensRights11/07/16 02:08 PM
1

you forgot the "shoot him in the dick" part. (tho it was actually hilarious as fuck when triceracop did it in kungfury.....)
/r/MensRights10/07/16 03:40 AM
2

damn.... that is actually really good >_ >
/r/MensRights10/07/16 03:34 AM
1

bro thats not even fair >> cake is like legendary. (seriously i love the fuck out of cake >>
/r/MensRights10/07/16 03:31 AM
1

the ironic thing is all of the deleted comments there are from Admin banned accounts from people circumventing bans, and had nothing to do with us. good show tho.
/r/MensRights08/07/16 07:54 PM
1

Feel free to repost using the articles title.
/r/MensRights08/07/16 06:05 PM
1

not a single one of these items are valid feminist arguments in the first world. if this was a viral video for, oh i don't know, Saudi Arabia, or some other place where women actually dont have rights, then this would be perfect (but you'd think they'd NOT use american music"). i loved the shot of the women in hijabs- you know that religious garment they are F O R C E D to wear. that thing they are brainwashed since puberty to think they need to wear.
/r/MensRights08/07/16 01:31 PM
0

Removed for Editorialized Click-bait/Rage title. We require that links of inflammatory nature use the headline from the article- specifically crafting a ragebait or provocative title is not allowed. Feel free to repost using the articles title.
/r/MensRights08/07/16 01:09 PM
1

Removed for not being a mens rights issue.
/r/MensRights08/07/16 03:53 AM
2

thats just good expectations of ANYONE in society. Be clean, be well dressed, be well spoken, and intelligent
/r/MensRights07/07/16 11:21 PM
25

“She’s well groomed, cultured, classy, able to converse about anything—but not bringing into it any of her real-world problems or feelings.” so effectively we expect them to behave like we expect men to? i see no problem with that.
/r/MensRights07/07/16 06:46 PM
1

i have given you an alternative that satiates your need to discuss this. pursue it or dont- either way, my removal stands. we are not a forum for discussing race issues, which is what this is about, and will always be about. BLM arent running arround saying this is a mens rights issue, they are saying its a racial issue.
/r/MensRights07/07/16 06:39 PM
1

I stand in solidarity with #blacklivesmatter
/r/MensRights07/07/16 06:33 PM
1

if you disagree then you are free do as ive suggested and make a post about ALL men - not just black men. we are not a forum for discussing exclusive RACIAL issues, and if your argument is about BLACK MEN, then it is a RACIAL issue, and unfit for our forum.
/r/MensRights07/07/16 06:26 PM
1

Because this issue is focalized in race, it is not a MR issue. if the argument being advanced was "police are too brutal to men" then it would stand, but because race is being included, its no longer a MR issue - we are not here to fight issues of race, we are here to fight issues of men. if you want to make a self post discussing the occurences of police against men in general, then you have all the approval in the world from us to do so. but if your focus is on black lives matter (as you initi…
/r/MensRights07/07/16 05:41 PM
1

so by your logic, for every one white person shot, five black people are shot; this would mean 80% of your 104 killings were potentially black. this makes for the actual fatal shooting rate for being male 20:5- or 4 for every 1 woman. the issue is race, not gender. there is a logical reason why unarmed males are shot more frequently than women, and its because most women pose absolutely no physical threat when unarmed. Nobody is training these police officers to shoot if the perp has a penis, th…
/r/MensRights07/07/16 05:12 PM
1

Black woman gets tasered after a stop woman repeatedly tazed for not leaving vehicle elderly well dressed and presented blackwoman tazed another black woman tased at stop it is not isolated to black males (if it were isolated to black males, it would be a mens rights issue), its isolated to being black period.
/r/MensRights07/07/16 03:18 PM
2

would be an option for creating male+Male babies (since thats a thing).
/r/MensRights07/07/16 02:43 PM
1

yet sperm banks are ok?
/r/MensRights07/07/16 02:41 PM
2

how on gods green earth is it ok to advertise the names and locations of people accused of a crime? whatever paper publicized this should be fined an exorbitant ammount.
/r/MensRights07/07/16 02:38 PM
2

woman, if that were true, we wouldn't have made it out of the caves. you can be attracted to whomever you want to be attracted to, but the fact is, i have literally seen women SALIVATING over a well cut male figure- there is no social construct there. it is literally the way they are born- attracted to males. your statement is identical to the argument used by homophobic retards who cant understand the basic precepts of attraction. YES some women are attracted to other women, just as some males …
/r/MensRights07/07/16 02:29 PM
5

america needs more men in general leading its class rooms. race is distinctly separate ability to perform. White, black, hispanic, native american, asian- it does not matter - we need more men in general; focusing onto the shortages of a single race, when all races face this issue, is foolhardy.
/r/MensRights07/07/16 02:25 PM
0

if earnest: i hate to pull these, but they truly are non-topical, and far better suited for subs focused on black issues. If sarcasam: if you disagree with my call, lets talk about it- maybe im off base.
/r/MensRights07/07/16 02:23 PM

Not a mens rights issue. this is a women behaving badly post. Removed for off topic.
/r/MensRights07/07/16 02:20 PM

is this showing the density of 2 parent families? if so, what is the link to mens rights? what is the benchmark? what constitutes the score? is it a % of shared parentage? This photo on its own is not able to paint a sufficient picture as a mens rights issue. try self posting this, and giving us a breakdown of exactly what we are looking at. Removed for off topic/Unclear topic.
/r/MensRights07/07/16 02:18 PM

While tragic and terrible, this is not a mens rights issue. he was shot for being black, which is in of itself a horrible thing. i say this simply because we do not see the same effects replicated across males of all other races. the causation is his race- not his gender. Removed for Not a mens rights issue.
/r/MensRights07/07/16 02:12 PM

This does not qualify as a Mens rights issue. while this is a Male victim, this is a police brutality/Race issue. while i understand this is an issue that black men face, it is clear that it the factor of being male is not the reason this incident happened. On the subject of this item: practically everywhere in the united states, the passenger of a vehicle cannot be required to produce identification - only the vehicular operator is required by law to produce any form of identification proving t…
/r/MensRights07/07/16 01:50 PM
1

just saw this comment now; theres a sticky in this thread about it.
/r/MensRights06/07/16 08:35 PM
1

participants can still view removed threads by clicking on their own comment history- and since we place the removal reason IN the post, its clear to everyone in participation. i'll restate my request: talk to us before blowing things out of proportion. This post is case in point; had this come to the mod mail attention, it would have been discussed, and reached this mutually beneficial conclusion- minus the drama.
/r/MensRights06/07/16 05:33 PM
2

what you are asking is impossible - once its removed its invisible to public eye unless directly linked. we will be transparent with the OP on why they are removed, but beyond it there's no effective way to publicize that.
/r/MensRights06/07/16 04:54 PM
3

the reason i didnt see it, is i browse the new segment, and this missed my radar (again, its hard to find something you arent looking for). 15hours ago i was sleeping off a 14 hour work day, and hadnt seen this. the meta thread is for discussing meta policy, e.g. our policy on topicality. messaging the mods is usually going to get you a response within the hour, unless you message us in the early AM's, then it might take a bit.
/r/MensRights06/07/16 04:39 PM

The reason for this removal: Usually posts of this nature are an attempt to editorialize, blow out of proportion a case that does not fit in the general Mens rights issues, or try to condone rapists who got off on a technicality (it is unclear if this is the case here). After reading up on reading this article I've come to the conclusion that the OP neither editorialized, nor tried to spin a bad case to fit their narrative, and that our decision to remove was in error. I've read, and found that …
/r/MensRights06/07/16 03:53 PM
2

oh no, someone got controll of an old mod account, banned all of their mods, banned all their users, and asked us to brigade.
/r/MensRights05/07/16 08:07 PM
1

its all good i approved it; ill just re-delete the old one.
/r/MensRights05/07/16 07:42 PM
1

i wasnt here, nor did i participate in them, so i dont know the context of what was removed. its entirely possible that they were posting unacceptable content as per the rules of reddit - i dont know. what i do know is our current mod policy, and its along the lines of what ive conveyed.
/r/MensRights05/07/16 07:21 PM
1

someone managed to take over their sub (likely via inactive mod rule), and then asked us to advocate brigading /moving into it. this was just a pre-empt to prevent it from happening, as its both not worth it, and needless.
/r/MensRights05/07/16 07:19 PM
2

Coment histories are only purged if their troll content is against the rules of reddit, OR if they were previously banned and posting from an Alternate. other than that we leave their post histories alone. it takes a significant ammount of effort to get a ban out of us if you are outside of those two items.
/r/MensRights05/07/16 07:08 PM
2

Fun fact- when we remove a troll, their post history goes as well in most cases. its likely these are just cherry picked happenstances trying to paint the picture that we are intolerant assholes in an echochamber.
/r/MensRights05/07/16 06:57 PM
1

generally those are better defined as anti-feminisim, not mens rights issues. those are two distinct things, and are often conflated under one umbrella " woman hate" ideal. its ok to be both a MRA and an anti feminist- just bear in mind that it ceases to be a mens rights issue, once it only pertains to feminisim.
/r/MensRights05/07/16 05:41 PM
1

via pishing, hacking, or abusing the new inactive mod rule, someone who is against that sub gains controll of that sub, boots all of the existing mods, bans all users of that sub, and deletes all css/everything, and then makes it impossible to use, and keeps the sub name locked up.
/r/MensRights05/07/16 03:33 PM
14

its an interesting question to say the least. generally the primary reason we are against third wave Radfeminism, is simply on merit of the current feminist narrative being overbearingly anti-male. when someone is out to convince the whole world you are cancerous, horrible, and in need of cleansing/re-education, there is little recourse beyond fighting back to debase that notion. if you notice, MRAs only argue on feminist points that directly blame men, or impact men negatively. there are NO arg…
/r/MensRights05/07/16 02:42 PM
3

the issue is that we cant allow brigading, even if you consider them insignificant. this is a very recent happenstance, and requires it to be addressed as soon as possible incase anyone is foolish enough to move over there and start flooding their sub.
/r/MensRights05/07/16 02:25 PM
2

our policy is just generally a "no cross linking" policy. basically what happens is AMR will find something that some retard posted, and lambast us over it, and then someone will find that post and cross link it here, where someone will spin it to be sympathetic to more MRAs, which then gets back to AMR, and it just continues up into one big spiral of circle jerk, untill we have a full blown tornado of circlejerking going on. that being said- if you see a post in AMR that actually had merit, or …
/r/MensRights05/07/16 02:22 PM
8

its equal parts of the rules of reddit, rules of the sub, and high ground.
/r/MensRights05/07/16 02:02 PM
8

i hate to admit it, but my situation was similar. there is no cure you can give them, its something they have to discover for themselves.
/r/MensRights05/07/16 01:36 PM
1

do you have some circumstance that prevents you from interacting with women?
/r/MensRights02/07/16 02:37 PM
1

and on the flipside, for them 8 hours of the day are no swim times for them. you cant convince me that 1>9 on 2-3 days a week at that.
/r/MensRights02/07/16 04:00 AM
0

but you are not being denied service, your being asked to come back an hour later. there is a difference between making a reasonable accommodation, and an unreasonable accommodation - they are a recognized and large religion in the usa, and their religion prevents interaction with men who arent their husbands. if you were kicking men out for no reason other than them being men, then yes you have a mens rights issue. this is a religious freedoms issue.
/r/MensRights01/07/16 12:18 PM
6

im cool with skirts. they make me feel like a wizzard harry.
/r/MensRights30/06/16 02:25 PM
2

generally they are supposed to keep interactions with gentile females to a minimum, they wont even shake their hands.
/r/MensRights30/06/16 02:17 PM
1

actually this wouldnt matter. i used to live balls deep in the biggest hasidic jew population on the east coast. they have litterally created a cult like community in which they can survive and opperate without any outside help. this creates an environment for brainwashing, which prevents the cycle from ever breaking. This is far less a mens rights issue than it is a religous freedoms issue.
/r/MensRights30/06/16 01:55 PM
1

they are being excluded because of religious needs, not because of gender. Hasidic jeudisim forbids women from portraying themselves in an alluring manner, or showing too much skin. this is more of a religious freedoms Vs what feminisim actually needs to be fighting issue than a mens rights issue.
/r/MensRights30/06/16 01:52 PM
2

acually Hasidic jeudisim is hyper orthodox, to which they keep their kids from public schools, and create a reality bubble in which the narrative is death and damnation for leaving the religon, and prevent them from knowing otherwise. hasidic jeudisim is extremely volatile, and virtually inescapable if you are born into it. I used to live in lakewood NJ and have first hand experience living in one of the biggest hasidic jew populations on the east coast. it was terrible.
/r/MensRights30/06/16 01:50 PM
2

they are legal tax payers who have requested a special religious accommodation for a service they have paid for; there is no mens rights issue here. this is a religious freedoms issue. Hasidic jews have a very strict set of rules that require women to have no unnecessary contact with men who arent their husbands, and to cover themselves.
/r/MensRights30/06/16 01:44 PM
3

presentation is everything. if you are confident, well spoken, attractive, and polite, there are very few jobs you cant walk into.
/r/MensRights29/06/16 08:25 PM
22

TL/DR: Confidence is all they care about. stop blaming your gender.
/r/MensRights29/06/16 06:23 PM

Flagging NSFW. while fake, doll boobies are still techinically NSFW.
/r/MensRights29/06/16 04:57 PM
2

its allowed to stay since robotic sex companions has been a hot topic for MR issues as of late.
/r/MensRights29/06/16 04:57 PM
2

just wait a little longer old man. one day she will move and talk to you.
/r/MensRights29/06/16 04:56 PM
2

TLDR: your a cis white male in western america- you dont matter.
/r/MensRights28/06/16 06:06 PM
1

it will be rocky if we introduce automation gradually. it will be smooth as hell if we "flip a switch" and turn on all automation at the same time, and convert to a ubi system.
/r/MensRights28/06/16 02:29 PM
1

honestly, the place for men in society labor wise is in dire jeapordy due to automation. the government needs to step in, and mandate that no automation can be allowed in a field, until ALL fields are ready to be automated. if you gradually introduce automation, the economy will decline, and ultimately collapse. if you do it all at once, and then switch to a UBI, the economy endures.
/r/MensRights28/06/16 02:28 PM
1

use the report button to bring it to our attention in the future :)
/r/MensRights28/06/16 01:34 PM
6

It's always somebody else's fault, right? Not at all. you are conflating blame and responsibility. A rapist is inherently blameworthy by default. Discussing the blame for rape is without any merit, because it is incontrovertibly the rapist. Responsibility to a point however lies with the victim. they are responsible for taking certain precautions to deter these crimes. Things such as Not getting black out drunk in public Not getting black out drunk around other people Taking a self defense cours…
/r/MensRights28/06/16 01:26 PM
1

i do this when im getting a laugh out of my family.
/r/MensRights27/06/16 08:05 PM
14

honestly. i feel like it should be perfectly reasonable to sue the doctor who circumcised you as a child. you shouldnt be able to circumcise a child at all.
/r/MensRights27/06/16 07:52 PM
14

its an issue of western society. we've treated women as incompetent for so long, that they are being raised with absolutely no sense of agency, duty, or responsibility. its going to take decades of work to fix that. To all of the parents out there: When was the last time you spanked your daughter? When was the last time you let her fail? When was the last time you even punished her? the fix starts with you. Teach her about duty and responsiblity now when shes young- teach her just as if she were…
/r/MensRights27/06/16 07:48 PM
2

http://imgur.com/a/2Tv8f eh?
/r/MensRights27/06/16 07:02 PM
1

women think that sexism only pertains to women, and that sexism against men doesn't exist.
/r/MensRights27/06/16 05:53 PM
3

google it; http://knowyourmeme.com/memes/how-can-she-slap Woman slaps man Man slaps back woman back with equal force Man is brutally beaten by several men, while screaming repeadtedly, "how can she slap"
/r/MensRights27/06/16 05:15 PM
2

In other news: WATER IS WET! FEMINISTS ARE CRAZY! DONALD TRUMP IS ACTUALLY HALF TANGERIENE!
/r/MensRights27/06/16 04:54 PM
45

nope you are 1000% in the right here. crime will happen. it is a fact. expecting it to not happen to you because it is wrong, is a foolish and petulant notion. you carry a taser, mace, knife, or gun to deter assaults and robberies, there is absolutely no reason rape is some special fucking flower crime and shouldn't be defended against on sheer principal. the fact of it is: If you leave your car door open, you can be upset that you were robbed, but the truth is ultimately you failed to take step…
/r/MensRights27/06/16 04:42 PM
1

just to put these things into perspective for you: 1 baby every hour is born addicted to drugs. 72% of all child abuse is at the hands of the mother. postpartum effects about 10% of women, and a sizeable piece of women afflicted go on to infanticide. Since there seems to be an epidemic of young female teachers fornicating with their child male students, should we start teaching them that rape is bad? should we start monitoring them and making them feel like criminals when they perpetrated no cri…
/r/MensRights25/06/16 02:13 PM
39

dear god i want to get this on video would be priceless.
/r/MensRights24/06/16 07:38 PM
1

segueing from this: forcing all men to attend a "dont rape class" is degrading, as it assumes we are not naturally possessed of the moral fiber to recognize right from wrong, and are inherently villainous
/r/MensRights24/06/16 06:47 PM
1

would you be ok if we required you as a prospective mother to attend a "dont kill your baby" class prior to giving birth? or the follow up class of "dont neglect and abuse your children"? or if you were a minority- a "dont leave your family' class, or a 'dont steal or be a criminal class?"
/r/MensRights24/06/16 06:43 PM
3

im an abusive bastard.
/r/MensRights21/06/16 08:25 PM
1

i hit her on YT- guess twitter had better luck; i literally just hit her on twitter since YT Failed.
/r/MensRights21/06/16 06:45 PM
1

oh shes on the list. i reached out to her, but havent gotten anything back from her. im going to start pinging her on twitter soon.
/r/MensRights21/06/16 06:23 PM
1

the laws of pretty much every first world country have protection of religious freedoms and practices.
/r/MensRights21/06/16 12:49 PM
1

believe so, tho in some jewish circles i doubt they have it.
/r/MensRights21/06/16 12:57 AM
1

i believe its actually classified a nursing level procedure since it not a life threatening procedure, so all you would need is a certification.
/r/MensRights21/06/16 12:05 AM
0

it actually does from a legal standpoint. you have no legal bias to drag a doctor into court to sue them for performing a properly done circumcision that was requested by the parents.
/r/MensRights20/06/16 09:06 PM
1

problem with that train of thought is that the religious communities in america, brittan, and other first world areas, have already condemned FGM- the very thing im saying they have to do with circumcision- and as a result there are no issues at all with passing laws barring it. if they did the same for circumcision it would get knocked down faster than SB668 did. Further you are trying to apply logic from a fifth world area that is barely above savagery to draw a parallel (Africa and the middle…
/r/MensRights20/06/16 08:27 PM
1

nope, not drinking any kool aid. just pointing out what any logical person would. kick and scream all you like about it. as long as religion and doctors alike both say its ok, it will never change; the best you can do is propagate information about it, and pressure religious people into giving up this idiotic practice.
/r/MensRights20/06/16 08:17 PM
1

i know right?
/r/MensRights20/06/16 08:13 PM
1

unfortunately, the quickest route for this to happen, is for religion to acknowledge that its wrong. if they as a whole say "whoops, we were wrong", that shit could be changed within the decade.
/r/MensRights20/06/16 07:52 PM
-2

And God said to Abraham, “As for you, you shall keep my covenant, you and your offspring after you throughout their generations. This is my covenant, which you shall keep, between me and you and your offspring after you: Every male among you shall be circumcised. You shall be circumcised in the flesh of your foreskins, and it shall be a sign of the covenant between me and you. He who is eight days old among you shall be circumcised. Every male throughout your generations, whether born in your ho…
/r/MensRights20/06/16 07:50 PM
0

The world doesnt classifiy it as a cosmetic surgery, and as such, it wont be considered child abuse. Please dont think that i am for circumcision- i myself was the victim of a bad one, and had several years of pain for it as a teen/adult- i am simply pointing out that this is not as simple of an issue as everyone wants it to be, and to fix it, the root of the problem- religion- needs to accept that it is wrong.
/r/MensRights20/06/16 07:04 PM
-2

unfortunately the child does not have the right to say no to a medical procedure the world has deemed acceptable if their parents choose to have it done. that is the truth of our world, and because it is so bound to religion, it cant be changed without these religions consenting, because they will just have it done elsewhere.
/r/MensRights20/06/16 06:58 PM
4

circumcision is bad - plainly so. there is no legitimate argument that can be raised to justify it.
/r/MensRights20/06/16 06:54 PM
2

again dont get me wrong- i am 100% against circumcision. Pro-circumcision is not what i am trying to convey here. our laws are too tightly bound to religious freedoms and practices, and banning circumcision will get knocked down 100% of the time if we try to enact as law.
/r/MensRights20/06/16 05:32 PM
0

in the government, and the laws eyes, it is a surgical procedure - not an assault. since the parent has full custody over their child to the point the child is practically property, they have no recourse to stop it from happening- compounded ontop of it being a religious practice held around the world. this is so intrinsically tied to their religion that it is literally an inseparable aspect at this point. if you barred it in the states, it would violate the constitution, and would get knocked d…
/r/MensRights20/06/16 05:28 PM
1

well unfortunately- we live in a society that protects religious beliefs- and rightfully so. i dont agree with us allowing it, but if we start picking and choosing what they can and cant do, especially on something like circumcision - a practice that their religion has held true through time for the last two thousand years or more, it will only give way to greater religious policing, and greater oppression of religion, and ultimately things will end badly for everyone involved - especially when …
/r/MensRights20/06/16 05:16 PM
1

lets be fair, a dog could be aiming a death ray at us and we'd probably die mid "Dawwwww"
/r/MensRights20/06/16 04:36 PM
1

hahah i thought it was a dog humping a drunk woman curled up by the bathtub. (oddly enough i've been party to just that scene before- Drunken room mate passed out on the bathroom floor, with her dog humping her face. it was hilarious- moreso because it was a little chihuahua doing it. i still have the video somewhere)
/r/MensRights20/06/16 04:00 PM
2

i cant tell, and i dont want to click... but it looks like a dog humping someone in the bathroom.
/r/MensRights20/06/16 03:34 PM
-3

i am not defending this- merely explaining: Circumcision is an EXTREMELY intrinsic piece of the Jewish/islamic religion- it is exceedingly likely to be the origin of circumcision practices. It is Especially important in the orthodox (Hasidic Judaism) communities- In most cases they will only allow their children to be circumcised by a Semikhah (ordained rabbi), as this represents a holy covenant between abraham and god. That being said: I am particularly against circumcision, however in extremel…
/r/MensRights20/06/16 03:29 PM

I have to remove this post btw; It has his photo and name- it goes against both our policy and the Reddit policy for publicizing personal information. If you want to re-post with his name redacted, that will be acceptable, or use Imgurs edit feature to crop it out.
/r/MensRights20/06/16 01:24 PM
0

there are a multitude of reasons why these controlls are on abortions currently. 48 hr waiting period is to stop women who are in an emotional swing from making a choice they would later regret. Hormonal imbalances, especially depression, are one of the chief aspects of pregnancy (hello Postpartum). Parental permission- Actually most states dont do this anymore, and those that do, obviously are for children under 18, and a doctor CANNOT perform an optional procedure on a minor without the parent…
/r/MensRights20/06/16 01:22 PM
1

i can attest that these three items work magically when used in almost this exact order > Punching bag > Weed >Videogames.
/r/MensRights17/06/16 06:51 PM
28

ask him when the last time he saw a husband drowning his child.
/r/MensRights17/06/16 06:39 PM
1

Videos unavailable in the USA. got a mirror?
/r/MensRights16/06/16 06:07 PM
5

Rape victims have the right to be believed.
/r/MensRights16/06/16 05:40 PM
23

bravo Harvard, fucking bravo. literally the forefront of law academia, and you would propose such an absurd notion as "foregoing the presumption of innocence". you are literally proposing that we undermine the entirety of what our legal system is founded on. i hope whoever put this forward is ejected posthaste.
/r/MensRights16/06/16 01:58 PM
1

it was in the unconventional defense tactics for countering leg locks.
/r/MensRights15/06/16 04:21 PM
5

and thus it begins. thank you judge for finally setting a precedent to put these predatory females where they belong.
/r/MensRights15/06/16 04:20 PM
3

i hate to pull this- but equality laws involving african americans just spontaneously generated themselves yea? gay and lesbian protections just sprung forth from nothingness? no it came as a result of addressing the societal inequality that existed for these groups and THEN creating laws to correct it.
/r/MensRights15/06/16 12:11 AM
11

i completely disagree. its incredibly hard to recognize any legal inequities without first recognizing the social inequities, as virtually all creation of equality law does not precede the existence of social bias, unless that law itself creates said bias. E.G. Tender years doctrine inadvertently created a social and legal bias against men, where there was no bias beforehand, and conversely the 19th amendment granting women the right to vote was done in response to a social inequity. Edit: TL/DR…
/r/MensRights14/06/16 04:24 PM
6

Every time feminists talk about toxic masculinity, there is a chorus of whiny dudes who will immediately assume — or pretend to assume — that feminists are condemning all masculinity, even though the modifier “toxic” inherently suggests that there are forms of masculinity that are not toxic. no thats exactly how it is used- anything masculine is toxic according to the big book of feminism. Wake the fuck up you retarded shitstains, being male didnt make him kill these people- RELIGION made him do…
/r/MensRights14/06/16 04:13 PM
16

Social issues remain a mens rights issue; the point of women expecting a privilege from men, while engendering us none of our own, falls well within our spectrum of issues.
/r/MensRights14/06/16 04:02 PM
1

no it wont reinforce women as sexual objects. it will take the power that women hold over sex out of the societal equation.
/r/MensRights14/06/16 02:01 AM
1

he shoots everyone
/r/MensRights13/06/16 04:55 PM

Thank you from the mod team /u/transman1212 for participating in this AMA. this is a sterling example of what we want our future AMA Sessions to be like. there were a few.... brusque questions, but nothing worthy of moderation in the slightest. I'll be locking and archiving this ama 06/14/2016 to ensure it isnt tampered with after the fact- Just a forewarning for you incase you had any more questions to answer.
/r/MensRights13/06/16 03:05 PM
1

unless your a bad ass like thomas wayne from flashpoint
/r/MensRights13/06/16 03:00 PM
1

testosterone is one of the primary agents to muscle building- once you start taking estrogen supplements and testosterone blockers, you stop building muscle without intensive training, and even then, you would struggle to get large muscle (most female body builders are on T supplements to allow for them to reach the sizes they do).
/r/MensRights13/06/16 02:59 PM
1

oh overlord pao- how i missed you you hypocritical piece of shit.
/r/MensRights13/06/16 02:16 PM
3

Avoid Community property states Prenuptuals are hit and miss. unless your prenup allots atleast 30% of your wealth to the spouse, chances are the judge is going to throw it out and take 50% of it. Dont marry someone for the sake of marrige. marry when you cant stand to be without that person.
/r/MensRights13/06/16 02:05 PM
1

whoops i had an extra Not in there.
/r/MensRights10/06/16 04:58 PM
5

just to be clear- both people are out of control, and both are wrong. his blows were done in retaliation, but were after the fact which makes them inexcusable- had he retaliated against her blows while still being assaulted, he would be in the right, however aggressively pursuing her when she tried to disengage , and that he went after the bystander is not acceptable.
/r/MensRights10/06/16 03:19 PM
13

how in the actual fuck did they legitimize her coming after him for money he didnt have during the course of the marrige?
/r/MensRights10/06/16 01:53 PM

that is the most click bait title i have ever seen in my life. watch the video and it becomes obvious why this title is a necessity. it is not about training women to be like a dog.
/r/MensRights10/06/16 01:46 PM
1

hes a troll that we banned for spam, so he keeps spamming alts.
/r/MensRights07/06/16 06:27 PM
3

Added
/r/MensRights07/06/16 03:16 PM
1

Added
/r/MensRights07/06/16 03:16 PM
2

just to cut in here; We are ok with anti-MRA's or feminists being placed on the list. there is no guarantee they will respond, or accept. We will allow them the platform to speak because only through dissenting discourse can resolution be found- if we sit in an echo chamber without ever working it out with the other side, shit never gets better.
/r/MensRights07/06/16 02:48 PM
3

actually this a is a pretty bad metaphor for apocalypse. Apocalypse would be the equivalent of the extremist group for the discriminated X-Men. he believes that mutants are the supreme race, and wants to wipe out regular humans. its a very Womens rights VS Feminisim metaphor. one is for peaceful coexistance, and the other is for Superiority.
/r/MensRights07/06/16 02:36 PM
1

oh the voting already happened; we had a post about it last week on sticky from 05/27-06/03
/r/MensRights07/06/16 11:49 AM
1

you will have to forgive me, your story says in the very first sentence that he is 18 and makes no distinction that he was the minor at the time of conception. The more concerning matter for you as a guardian- if you were allowing children to fornicate you could potentially find yourself in hot water should that fact ever be bought up depending on your states statutory laws. the other thing to consider is that most states have "for the children" laws, that will effectually bind your son now that…
/r/MensRights07/06/16 12:46 AM
1

there is a legal distinction between being offended, and them having committed an offense. if they lied to your son about it, as an adult, he is the offended party; legally speaking they committed no offense to you as you are no longer his legal guardian and responsible for him. if he were still a child you could, but once he hits 18 (and 16 in most states), he is culpable for his actions.
/r/MensRights07/06/16 12:26 AM
2

its a distinction of the two types; E.G: they want a topical discussion, but want it to be unrestricted within that topic. this means you are discussing, mens rights, and as long as you are talking about Mens rights, it doesnt matter how rude you are so long as its on point. on the other hand if they ask for an AMA but want it kept civil, it would be would be "you can ask them anything, as long as its suitable for civil discussion" the true free for all is an AMA Freeforall, which is likely what…
/r/MensRights07/06/16 12:09 AM
1

not a lawyer, but to my limited knowledge tort law requires you to be the offended party, or the guardian of the party at the time of the crime. if hes 18, there is little you can do. your best bet is to talk to a lawyer about this.
/r/MensRights06/06/16 08:47 PM
5

hey, no problem, we are working through a verification process for this, so sit tight- we will reach out once we have everything in order.
/r/MensRights06/06/16 06:39 PM
8

that was part of my plan :) there are a bunch here however who i dont recognize, and i just need to know who to ask as a MRA (E.G. Karen Straughn is a MRA), Who to ask as an impartial (E.G. Shoe0nHead is an impartial), and who to ask as a Feminist - as you can understand those invitations would have to be particularly worded for who the recipient is.
/r/MensRights06/06/16 03:24 PM
6

actually feminisim is one of the biggest detriments to mens rights They consistently demonize men They actively campaign against alimony and cs reform they fearmonger rape hysteria (again about men) they keep forcing Muh wage gap (again about men) i mean litterally every single argument being advanced by thirdwave feminists is trying to damage men. they even try to blame Roe V Wade, even tho it was upheld by female justices multiple times.
/r/MensRights06/06/16 01:45 PM
-2

you are conflating reasonable and correct.
/r/MensRights03/06/16 10:46 PM
1

you pretty much hit the nail on the head - stuff that is disruptive to the event, not legitimate participation, is what i am referring to.
/r/MensRights03/06/16 10:21 PM
2

dont get me wrong, im not saying it should be ok to doink a 13 yearold; im saying we are responsible for preparing them to make that choice, because god willing, if a 13 yearold has figured out he or she wants this "sex thing", and has figured out how good masturbation feels, then their next step is to fornicating with someone else their age, who is just as likely to not be prepared.
/r/MensRights03/06/16 10:18 PM
-1

oh dont get me wrong; im not defending her, or him, just that the base of his logic isnt fundamentally incorrect.
/r/MensRights03/06/16 08:59 PM
1

but how can a 13 year old be responsible for knowing about things like getting pregnant and STDs. i'm of the mindset that Sex ed needs to happen WAY earlier than it does, and needs to go into gross detail, not this mamby pamby "but god says its naughty" stuff we did when i was in high school (seriously i was 15 by the time i had a sex ed course- two years shy of when i actually needed it). It remains fact that people are often most damaged by what they have no exposure to, as they haven't had an…
/r/MensRights03/06/16 08:58 PM
0

he surprisingly raises reasonable arguments.
/r/MensRights03/06/16 08:49 PM
1

we are going to offer the AMA participants the options of Free-for-all, On-Topic, or Civil-anything talk.
/r/MensRights03/06/16 06:23 PM
1

Use the post link, or this link to go to the AMA Thread
/r/MensRights03/06/16 05:55 PM
4

just remember The golden rule of the internet: 90% of people will hate your content. its the 10% that dont hate it that matter.
/r/MensRights03/06/16 04:42 PM
3

CA Also has imminent threat laws; essentially if anyone calls in DV- if there is observable evidence of DV, they can act on it then and there, and press charges on behalf of the state even if she didnt ask them to.
/r/MensRights03/06/16 04:30 PM
2

he is apocalypse...... do you not know that he is litterally there to kill everyone? he couldnt give two fucks about mystiques vagina hes there to fucking murder everyone and give no fucks.
/r/MensRights03/06/16 04:27 PM
17

yes people... this is how the feminist brain works. be amazed- the fact that it still hasnt suffocated from forgetting to breathe is a marvel in of itself.
/r/MensRights03/06/16 04:25 PM
15

less about who is the biggest victim, and more about shedding light on something that is just as relevant but recieves a modicum of the attention given to a less frequent ailment.
/r/MensRights03/06/16 04:17 PM
2

last i checked On Non Reciprocal IPV Women abuse by a larger margin than men. On Reciprocal IPV women are the largest initiator. On Child abuse - women are disgustingly higher than males (60-40) you can try browsing what little we have in the wiki, or the two links for the FAQ, and the RBOMI. the child abuse i believe you can source right from the american humane society.
/r/MensRights03/06/16 12:55 PM
2

it might be better to invite some /r/legaladvice ☆ Users These are generally people with a proven track record for having good knowledge of our laws and legal system, and would regularly deal with these things, and best of all are established redditors.
/r/MensRights03/06/16 12:48 PM
1

Three reasons First is the LAPD Statement An LAPD spokesperson told PEOPLE that officers responded to a 911 call but determined there was “no evidence of any crime” at the scene. In a statement Tuesday, Heard’s lawyers said she declined to make a statement to police at the time to “protect her privacy and Johnny’s career,” but plans to make one and “hopes to give the LAPD the opportunity to conduct an accurate and complete investigation.” Last i checked- in california if in any circumstance wher…
/r/MensRights02/06/16 12:58 PM
3

its a logical approach that many are trying to push to the forefront. whats ok for one, has to be ok for the other, or else democracy fails.
/r/MensRights01/06/16 05:14 PM
6

This ladies and gents- Is a genuine Grade A Pedophile. She is obviously an attractive woman, and could literally have her pick of sexual/relationship partners in her age range- yet she gravitated to a pubescent teen, and had repeated sexual encounters with him. There is no other logical explanation than her being a Pedophile.
/r/MensRights01/06/16 05:10 PM
7

that "black eye" is makeup.....
/r/MensRights01/06/16 01:37 PM
10

so every mother on welfare then yea? or better yet every mother who gives the child up for adoption. not like theres millions of abanoned kids every year.
/r/MensRights01/06/16 12:33 AM
2

theres no technical name for it last i checked- but this is the procedure to fix it (NSFW) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frenuloplasty_of_prepuce_of_penis thankfully i havent had it happen again since i started a stretching routine to try and restore, but god it is freaking painful- cant engage in sex, masturbation, or even have a plain old errection without serious pain once its ripped. it commonly happens under the head on the ferenulum, and ontop of the head at the base of the glans.
/r/MensRights31/05/16 11:58 PM
10

its is a disgusting measure. there needs to be some kind of action taken to stop this. we cant advocate any kind of DDoS attacks, even if this is a particularly heinous incursion, and shouldn't be allowed in any world. any canadian MRAs outthere working to get this pulled?
/r/MensRights31/05/16 08:58 PM
2

we will likely see the end of the bipartisan system and adopt a multiple party system similar to the UK at this rate. I'm of the mindset that people should only be writing laws in areas they specialize or have notable experience in. E.G. These dinosaurs shouldn't be writing tech law regarding tech they have absolutely no clue about.
/r/MensRights31/05/16 08:53 PM
1

oh that person >_> yea i'll certainly reach out if there is a demand lol.
/r/MensRights31/05/16 08:42 PM
1

thats cool :O it's like having magneto in your scrote.
/r/MensRights31/05/16 08:27 PM
1

I'm not familiar with her- is she hyper opposed to MR Issues? (just curious, we will certinaly still ask if there is a demand for it; just want to know if im inviting someone to a crucifixion, it would be common courtesy to let them know before they sign on lol)
/r/MensRights31/05/16 08:16 PM
1

removed for incorrect formatting (someone else put the suggestion up in the correct format, so we are gonna run with that)
/r/MensRights31/05/16 08:13 PM
7

well that was a particularly rage invoking read.
/r/MensRights31/05/16 08:06 PM
1

yea, there are some companies looking into temporary steriliziation. theres a german company working on a Valve switch that you can just click on and off and sits inside of the sack. there is another that basically clogs up your pipes before it can even leave your body. both of these are still in testing to my knowledge.
/r/MensRights31/05/16 07:59 PM
2

circumcised; there can be a complication when reaching puberty if the doctor didnt leave enough skin to where your penis doesnt have enough stretching room.
/r/MensRights31/05/16 06:27 PM
2

yes. no lubrication can cause painful tearing if your skin is too tight (mine is). as a teen it was pretty painful just to have an erection at all, and at first caused tearing all on its own (imagine having paper cuts all around your penis just under the head, where the skin reattaches to the head). its naturally stretched over the years so that it no longer tears from just being erect. i have had several painful tears- some even during intercourse that have caused profuse bleeding. Saw a doctor…
/r/MensRights31/05/16 05:50 PM
2

there are some potentially painful issues with circumcision. im of the mindset that you shouldn't circumcise until adulthood, or only in the event of correcting a foreskin related issue, simply due to the issues it can cause in development.
/r/MensRights31/05/16 05:40 PM
1

Bangkok is the far better destination for that anyways >_>
/r/MensRights31/05/16 05:37 PM
11

Cthulhu, Murder, or suicide are pretty much the only three outs. Satan used to be a big player, but got out of the picture because it wasnt worth the hassle.
/r/MensRights31/05/16 05:33 PM
1

generally WBB only gets allowed, when that bad behavior directly impacts men.
/r/MensRights31/05/16 04:24 PM
1

to be clear on the rabble-rousing tho, it wasnt directed at you - a few users took advantage of the platform your question raised to try and rabble-rouse the sub into an anti-mod standpoint, or blow up modmail with more "fuck you mods" messages. You however raised a legitimate concern, and stated your argument properly, and it resulted in a revision of our stance on this, to a point where i think we can come to a happy middle ground.
/r/MensRights31/05/16 02:52 PM
1

congrats on making the most contriversial suggestion so far- you are currently +7/-6 on this.
/r/MensRights31/05/16 02:45 PM
4

that is pretty much where we stand on the point. If there is a MGTOW post about a Rally for fighting the social injustices of men, That is something we would allow, and hell would probably sticky, but if its just a post about MGTOW in general, with no real ties to a MR issue, then we generally Don't allow it, and ask that they go to the proper sub for it. Same goes for TRP- if they are rallying to say- debunk T.IX, we would gladly support and allow it, but if its just a post about AWALT or somet…
/r/MensRights31/05/16 01:58 PM
4

that was what i took from the article. that she requested his testicles be removed postmortem, mere hours after he died, and the family had no idea until the courts were almost ready to talk about it, giving them no real time to consider, or hire a lawyer.
/r/MensRights31/05/16 01:53 PM
5

we dont reject them because of the image at all. we reject them because there are subs dedicated to MGTOW/TRP ideologies and those ideologies are most often not direct mens rights issues.
/r/MensRights31/05/16 01:28 PM
1

careful with the rabble-rousing.
/r/MensRights31/05/16 12:46 PM
1

that would be pretty interesting. if you know anybody to suggest, please do
/r/MensRights31/05/16 12:20 AM
1

You apparently have the IQ of an amoeba. I have no desire to hate women; I do have a desire to defend the rights of downtrodden men to express their feelings, whether offensive or not. And we ask that you do it in the proper space- just like everything else - even your first ammendment right. If you cant respect that, then dont participate.
/r/MensRights29/05/16 04:09 PM
1

sorry you feel that way. there are other subs more suitable to your desire for hating women- i suggest you go there.
/r/MensRights29/05/16 01:38 PM
0

if by many you mean four? then sure.
/r/MensRights29/05/16 03:02 AM
2

No you don't. Notice even here you are very dismissive of anything I say. In the past, the mods have completely made things up about me to discredit my arguments, such as saying that I was colluding with others because they had the same opinion as me. I haven't been "kicking and screaming" at all. I've presented very rational arguments, you provide no counter-arguments, and you just say no. Well, my original arguments are still there. Again that introspection thing i mentioned before. if its hap…
/r/MensRights29/05/16 03:02 AM
0

sorry if your impression is that we are going to be policing the content of the questions. we are going to be policing troll attempts, and blatant abuse.
/r/MensRights29/05/16 12:00 AM
0

There is a notable difference between not letting someone have their way because they kicked and screamed about it, and flat out disregarding their stance - we often take advisement or wisdom from our user base and regularly revise our practices if logical arguments are presented. Given this fact- perhaps you should engage in some introspection on the subject of your presentation and approach; you might find that the answer to why you have so much heartburn with us is likely a defect within the …
/r/MensRights28/05/16 11:57 PM
0

Thats fine that you think that. It doesnt change the fact that if someone comes out as plainly trying to antagonize them, that the comment will be removed. ive given examples of the lowest caliber of commentary that wouldnt even be removed (E.g. do you like buttsecks) if asked as a legitimate question. If you dont like it i suggest you just dont participate.
/r/MensRights28/05/16 09:18 PM
0

we can consider leaving the response choice up to them. We cant however just give full tilt for people to behave like savages if we want these to be a repeat occurrence.
/r/MensRights28/05/16 06:06 PM
1

Theres a difference between not allowing people to ask uncomfortable questions, and not allowing people to abuse a guest. There is a clear cut distinction between the two. They are here as a courtesy, and dont deserve to be subjected to abuse. You are forgetting that there are a multitude of subs that would love nothing more to troll the fuck out of any one we bring in, and this is there for that. you could ask them if they like taking it in the ass if you want- its a valid question, but if your…
/r/MensRights28/05/16 05:16 PM

Name: Example guy Internet Handle: ExampleGuy Reddit Profile: /u/ExampleGuy YouTube Chanel: youtube.com/ExampleGuy Alt. Contact : @Exampleguy
/r/MensRights28/05/16 02:40 PM
1

its less of a self censorship, and more of a "We arent like feminisim"- Because thats what feminisim does- blames the other gender for all of its problems instead of facing them head on and fixing them. Women may be involved in alot of our problems, but that does not make them Wholly bad or the sole source of these issues, and blaming them, talking poorly about thing, or ridiculing them does not cure our issues. 1 inconsequential to the topic. a relatively large figurehead in the MRM suggested t…
/r/MensRights28/05/16 02:09 PM
1

oh god... Hurg... Is this.. Ulp... Really a thing??? HORRRRRRRRRRRRRRKKKKKKKKKK
/r/MensRights27/05/16 07:03 PM

i'd highly suggest that our users take to heart what he said about our tone regarding women- it deters people who would otherwise be willing members of the movement. other than that, that was a great shout out from him regarding us.
/r/MensRights27/05/16 02:34 PM
1

yea this post is removed tho?
/r/MensRights26/05/16 05:53 PM
1

thanks for the heads up. do you have a link
/r/MensRights26/05/16 05:45 PM
1

that doesnt matter because reddit is not twitter. you could post nudes of her all over twitter for all reddit cares, but you cant link her personal information of that detail on reddit. its not even a MR rule, its a all of reddit rule.
/r/MensRights26/05/16 05:44 PM
1

looks alot like my male handwriting :/
/r/MensRights26/05/16 02:51 PM

Removed- Personalizes information. Gives her photo, place of work and name- Reddit rules forbid this- Redact all of it and repost if you want to continue.
/r/MensRights26/05/16 02:50 PM
8

maybey we should start a slogan of #Wifeup because its not men who are to blame for marriage rates declining- that much is for certain.
/r/MensRights25/05/16 05:52 PM
2

The content of Milos burns are like ambrosia.
/r/MensRights25/05/16 01:26 PM
1

its honestly why i plan on adopting if nothing changes in my life over the next two years.
/r/MensRights25/05/16 01:02 PM
10

daddy, i need an empirical study of at least ten thousand people across varied geographies to quantify that statement.
/r/MensRights24/05/16 08:08 PM
5

I think you might be off there; Step parents are the most LIKELY to abuse a child, however they make up a much smaller portion of the actual abuse population (E.G. Not real numbers- 50% of step parents abuse their children, Step parent abuse only accounts for 10% of the abuse population due to density. this means that if step parents occupied the majority, they would be both the most frequent and likely abuse statistic). Biological mothers abuse children at double the frequency of all other pare…
/r/MensRights24/05/16 07:15 PM
11

probably because the childs gender shouldnt matter to the father, nor to the observer. and to be quite clear, biological fathers are the LOWEST abuse category when it comes to children, while biological mothers represent the highest.
/r/MensRights24/05/16 06:21 PM
10

Fatherhood itself isnt an MRM issue- its a blessing and a privilege, and should always be celebrated. its when that fatherhood becomes compromised, or damaged, looked down on, or harmed in someway that it becomes an MRM issue (E.G. Divorced mothers trying to convince the child that their father is a bastard because she has an ax to grind with him).
/r/MensRights24/05/16 03:32 PM
1

nah rohyphenol leaves a trace. its only in your system for two days usually tho. any next day rapekit will find traces of it if used. you dont hear about it much because usually the girls getting blackout drunk and roofied just write it off as getting blackout drunk. Also they are not very frequently used anymore. people use easier to obtain prescription mood alters like xanax, klonopin and valum, which are just as effective at getting someone to "no memory level drunk" (source: Ex girlfriend wa…
/r/MensRights24/05/16 02:49 AM
1

not that i know of. i just know thats the primary source of it.
/r/MensRights23/05/16 10:26 PM
2

Lets call mansplaining what it actually is. Mansplaining is anytime a man says something to a woman that she either does not like, does not want to hear, or runs counter to her thoughts, ideals or beliefs- Lit. Anytime a man opens his mouth. on the example you provided: i don't think that has ANYTHING to do with being female. i do this to other males, i do it to my seniors, i do it to my juniors, i do it to my little cousin, i do it to my own mother (not my grandmother tho, she'd take my ass out…
/r/MensRights23/05/16 03:26 PM
2

Those imgur comments are a freaking feminist cesspool.
/r/MensRights23/05/16 03:12 PM
5

you have two options here. Acquiesce and help her. Pros: You keep workplace tensions low, you improve workplace morale, and you dont gain this woman as an enemy Cons: you feel like a little bitch. You tell her that its ok to behave this way. Confront her and tell her no- that we are an equal society, and she has no right to expect anything from you due to your gender, much like you dont expect anything from her by merit of her gender. Pros - you stood your ground. you communicated an effective m…
/r/MensRights23/05/16 02:54 PM
2

your first assumption that the moniker of "deadbeat dad" is even correct from the onset. a "Deadbeat Dad" is a dad who fails, refuses, or is incapable of paying child maintenance, or alimony payments. it is a label created by mothers to insult, jab, and harm their ex-partners as much as they possibly can. This assumes that the process and concept of child support and alimony are fundamentally just and correct practices. more often than not, any father paying both childsupport and alimony will be…
/r/MensRights23/05/16 02:48 PM
1

rohypnol can be whipped up by anyone with a little bit of time and chemistry knowledge. College students are generally the primary manufacturers of this substance to my knowledge. they generally whip this and X up to make some spare change.
/r/MensRights23/05/16 02:27 PM
9

So what? Peter, a woman can't sexually harass a man.
/r/MensRights23/05/16 02:17 PM
1

i think you may be grossly uneducated on the topic of conditioning, and conditioned reflexes. Look up Pavlovian response when you get a chance. Essentially if i blow a whistle , and then slap you, and continue that process for your whole life, you will reflexively wince and think you are about to be slapped when you hear the whistle, even if i dont raise my hand. my statement has nothing to do with anything you've mentioned. a clarifying moment, or a crystallizing moment, is a moment where thing…
/r/MensRights21/05/16 01:25 PM
1

this isnt a new notion.... i mean come on, has nobody heard of a mistress? its factual that men are sexually active far earlier and longer than women, and its not an illogical course. I've said this a million times, and thats Sex and love are two seperate things- the majority of men need sex on a primal level, but that doesnt mean they love or dont love you. those are seperate things entirely.
/r/MensRights20/05/16 08:43 PM
12

you very obviously do not have bodyhair yourself. I do, and in ample supply, and i can tell you first hand- "a razor' is not a valid option. you will be in for a miserable month if you decide to razor yourself. the only option is waxing.
/r/MensRights20/05/16 07:17 PM
3

arguably yes as the familial paradigm has only very recently begun to shift as a result of the Extreme PC culture that is hell bent on demonizing men.
/r/MensRights20/05/16 07:02 PM
5

studies have shown that fathers are the most influential and forming factor in a childs life.
/r/MensRights20/05/16 06:45 PM
4

DDDDOUBLE STANDARD
/r/MensRights20/05/16 06:35 PM
14

hes probably about 5'9-6'2 based on his legs, and weighs about 160-200. id say he is a far cry from fat, and body hair is a natrual biproduct of testosterone- something men usually have in ample supply.
/r/MensRights20/05/16 06:33 PM
147

i mean according to the story provided: this father is literally getting shit on by his child all so that he can make sure the child is being kept comfortable and safe. this is a perfect example of everything a father should aspire to be, and i feel sick with myself for even having a bad thought about this when i first saw it.
/r/MensRights20/05/16 04:10 PM
2

and eventually just kills himself when he finds out that Bart was actually Lenny's son. you mean, and then goes to prison because he cant afford the payments, and finally hangs himself when he finds out all of his children arent his.
/r/MensRights20/05/16 01:48 PM
4

Religion.
/r/MensRights20/05/16 01:40 PM
486

its when you see this as a man, and your first thought is a bad one about the male in the picture, that you have a clarifying moment where you realize just how far society has damaged you.
/r/MensRights20/05/16 01:17 PM
4

no, that is very specifically what dimorphisim is. you can use dimorphic traits to define a creature via observation. you literally cannot look at a brain and go "thats a mans brain" for any certainty. you can GUESS at it based on the 0-2% size difference that occurs across the median of male/female brain weight/volumes, but even then there is no distinct part that you can use to identify their sex. if i stand an average male next to an average female- our dimorphic traits are Adams apple Facial…
/r/MensRights19/05/16 04:58 PM
1

thats the thing though, we HAVE defined all of the parts of the brain and how they interconnect- we are still a little fuzzy on the microscopic details, but we are exceedingly familiar with it. there is no magical sector of the brain that females have, but males do not, and vice versa.
/r/MensRights19/05/16 04:51 PM
1

oh you see i was explaining the obvious point, that while sexual dimorphisim is a thing in our species, we have yet to define any substantial unique differences between male and female brains; therefore your postulation is incorrect from the onset.
/r/MensRights19/05/16 04:40 PM
1

no... im pretty sure its true. they found traits commonly found in female brains within male brains at a common frequency, and male traits in a female brain at a common frequency, showing that while there may be a median difference when looking at the end result of the whole, there is no distinct definition of a male or female brain. EDIT: TL/DR- There is no magical part of a brain that makes males and females distinctly seperate, which is the very definition of dimorphisim.
/r/MensRights19/05/16 04:34 PM
1

i think that belief came from the hundreds of thousands of brain dissections that weve done on both males and females, and have determined that there is virtually no "male" or "female" brain configuration or structure, that each brain is varied, and traits and features are shared across the sexes.
/r/MensRights19/05/16 04:23 PM
4

nice. that is a perfect example of men being too afraid to defend or look out for another man.
/r/MensRights19/05/16 01:13 PM
3

While i believe hillary is a plauge on this planet, this isnt directly a mens rights issue; however since you self posted and proved topicality, all is good. Im calling this out simply because this is a prime example of how to get an off topic post, on topic, and MRM Relevant.
/r/MensRights19/05/16 12:50 PM
1

but the candy....
/r/MensRights19/05/16 12:46 PM
1

No i'm good :) Seriously, however, thanks for the words of encouragement. Feel free to disseminate it if you want. i was thinking of putting together an infographic on this some day, but just had not gotten around to it.
/r/MensRights19/05/16 12:46 PM
1

oh yea Thanks! its from a write up i did on the how and why feminism is a cult, and how to cure the issues of feminism while moving forward into a truly equal gender paradigm in which men and women can co-exist within an egalitarian state that has properly addressed everyone issues.
/r/MensRights18/05/16 04:46 PM
7

its a concept pertaining to cults, essentially a granfalloon is a mindset that something is factual, and encourages people to believe in it. The concept of the patriarchy is not in of itself the granfalloon, but a biproduct of it. Heres something i wrote about how feminisim is a full blown cult using anthony pratkains model. Steps to form a cult Create your own social reality through isolating people geographically or socially How feminists Achieve this: Feminism does this by creating a fictitio…
/r/MensRights18/05/16 04:14 PM
6

there are no protections for men in the first world unless they are specifically non-white, and even then those are meager.
/r/MensRights18/05/16 01:55 PM
7

Not in the slightest. Nothing will happen though unless they deny a male applicant for merit of his gender, and he pursues an EEOC complaint, which wont be taken seriously.
/r/MensRights18/05/16 01:19 PM
16

Were ok with offensive as long as its topical to the MRM :) There is currently an epidemic of women in the first world, who erroneously believe themselves to be underpaid oppressed creatures victimized by the mystical patriarchy. You are not oppressed in the first world. you have access to MORE rights and social protections than your male counterparts. You are NOT underpaid. The wage gap is a myth started by the feminist movement, in which they simply aggregated the average earnings of men and w…
/r/MensRights18/05/16 01:03 PM
1

Diplomacy is always important. Tho diplomacy has certianly lost a lot of value since the introduction of the global economy. The threat of mutual destruction has pretty much kept everyone but the middle east and North korea in line (ironically because they arent really a functional member of said global economy)
/r/MensRights17/05/16 08:27 PM
6

and this is why america is doomed. These people have swallowed the blue pill and chosen to live in their fantasy world, where an game in an imaginary fantasy world that was meant to invoke heroisim and adventure in kids, was actually a rape story. Tho.... its as if they thought this song was what mario was about... god i forgot how much the nerd in me loved this song.
/r/MensRights17/05/16 04:31 PM
3

If she wants to address the real issues at hand, she should come here so we can dismantle this piece of dreck.
/r/MensRights17/05/16 02:47 PM
28

that was probably the most innacurate, heinous piece of feminist garbage ive seen in a long long long time.
/r/MensRights17/05/16 02:44 PM
1

awesome thanks dude. its a dangerous world out there, and if you put yourself out there you gotta be prepared. ive seen plenty of good people put their info out there on non-related things, and get burned for it.
/r/MensRights17/05/16 02:07 PM

Hey buddy, sorry, but im removing this temporarirally. while i completely agree with everything you are doing- you need to redact your name at the very least. publicising your name and location, and on the /r/Mensrights sub could potentially be dangerous for you. Relink to one with your name redacted and well be good, and i'll reinstate the post. Please dont think this a censorship effort or any attempt to silence you. As a young adult exposing yourself on the internet is a fairly risky thing, a…
/r/MensRights17/05/16 01:52 PM
3

interesting video, but it feels like your title is a bit click baity; in the future try to align with the content you are presenting a bit closer if you could. sorry it took so long to get this one out of the filter.
/r/MensRights17/05/16 01:32 AM
1

you were shut down over two weeks ago.
/r/MensRights16/05/16 12:43 PM
-1

oh you mean this discussion? yea no. https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/4gydhw/males_on_benefits_are_forced_to_take_any_job/d2lzxxy
/r/MensRights16/05/16 03:58 AM
0

I remember that one. it was a piece on german force placed work, and you had tried to spin it as if she either was getting special treatment or unlawfully rejected her job, when they went counter to their own laws and assigned her a job in a brothel. I said it before, and i will say it again. you can force someone into bad work, dangerous work, boring work, any kind of work, but you cannot force them into sex work.
/r/MensRights16/05/16 03:55 AM
3

Not at all. you are referencing a snippet from a fight that was removed. there was no meaningful discussion being had, and was just two users blasting rage at each other. To pretend that misogyny doesn't exist, is the same as pretending that Misandry doesnt exist. this wasnt a discussion that was counter to feminisim btw.... i think you are reading too much into this.
/r/MensRights15/05/16 05:47 PM
0

not to re-open an old debate, but one is clearly a race issue (no hirings of white men), which i would agree is not a direct issue to mens rights- clearly a race issue. and the other looks to have been purged from the authors site (unless its hidden somwhere i cant find). Putting that aside: You and i may not agree on things, but this is the basic logic that i stick to - and as long as i am a mod here - regardless of who you are, if you are within the meets and bounds of that logic- i will 100% …
/r/MensRights14/05/16 09:20 PM
0

some good ole feelgood activisim
/r/MensRights14/05/16 03:40 PM
-1

No, it wasn't. If it was, you'd have said as much, rather than portraying conservative men's advocates as wanting a say because "the old way is the best way". even how you have posted this quote string is painfully obvious that it was my intent. my initial question still stands, why should we? The question was are you so arrogant as to think that your view specifically deserves a place over other views? our mod policy is Impartial for a reason - allowing a mod purely based on the fact of their c…
/r/MensRights14/05/16 03:18 PM
-2

thats not even what we are talking about here. my remark was in response to or that women are inferior. the fact of the matter is that we DONT censor him, despite his world views, because we DONT censor. this is a discussion about differentiating between Censorship and reddit curation (keeping shit on topic).
/r/MensRights14/05/16 01:10 PM
-1

And drawing attention to Emma Watson's documented financial indiscretions = hate mob? Pointing out women who behave badly = hate mob? Equal scrutiny and treatment of powerful women = hate mob? i dont know how you got back to us making these choices out of fear of becoming a hate mob. we made these choices because frankly NONE of them on their own are a mens rights issue. Again, I've seen topical posts deleted in the past because they were deemed "off topic". And if they were then they should not…
/r/MensRights14/05/16 11:08 AM
1

sorry, a long reply begets a long reply- i answered your points in sequence across two posts. hope this clears up where we stand.
/r/MensRights14/05/16 04:31 AM
0

You seem to be laboring under the misconception that there is any way to not be branded as a hate group. Lets say hypothetically that i'm black male and the stereotype of my race is that i'll leave my childen fatherless. Does that mean that i should just throw up my arms and go "cya kids". i realize that this is a strawman on my part, but i cant help but point out the fatuous natureof your remark. Just because the world brands us as a hate sub, does not give us license to be one. What's absolute…
/r/MensRights14/05/16 04:30 AM
1

When did a viewpoint have to be considered the best, by consensus, in order to be heard in this subreddit?hatever happened to the idea that intellectual and political diversity is the only kind that really matters? Whatever happened to the idea that the popularity, or lack thereof, of an idea or way of thinking has any bearing on its validity? When did the mods of this subreddit decide that ideological purity in terms of any political system was a good thing? This coment was made to point out th…
/r/MensRights14/05/16 04:30 AM
1

Hi troll. did you not read the part where i said Apart from enforcing our young account tolerance rule, and repeatedly banning our resident alt troll, we have removed a total of ten posts this week ten out of . seven of them were from the four people in question. the other three were all ok with their post removal, and took it to self post. Meaning that NOT COUNTING the thirty to forty posts a week we kill from you, only ten came from people OTHER than you.
/r/MensRights13/05/16 07:45 PM
0

oh, im sorry... did you think that all upvotes are indicitive of people agreeing that they are being censored? did it occurr to you that perhaps... oh i dont know... maybe they are upvoting because they appreciate transparency? have you noticed that its litterally just the same four people who have lodged any form of complaint- every other post here was about "yes the mods are doing their jobs, and doing it well".
/r/MensRights13/05/16 07:41 PM
0

sorry SM :P I have traditional conservative views (mainly that i still believe in things like traditional male gender roles being valuable, and marrige not being a dead end trap), but i dont let them out of their cage very often. i know the value of knowing the other side of the fence so it keeps me leaning towards the middle more often than not.
/r/MensRights13/05/16 07:34 PM
2

again discussion on guilt or innocence is more than welcome, we just cant allow headlines like this. (not saying that you did or anything, just an example lol)
/r/MensRights13/05/16 03:41 PM
2

yep, unless its a tiny privately owned company. those usually dont have communications agreements.
/r/MensRights13/05/16 03:32 PM

Despite this being a valid post, we have to remove it for propagating personalized information (her name and photo). This is to remain in compliance with the rules of reddit regarding doxxing.
/r/MensRights13/05/16 03:32 PM
3

actually in this case it usually will. See the company owns any and all communications going in and out of it. this includes any form of telecommunications such as calls, emails, etc ect. When talking to an outside party they are required to comply with the consent order (that line "this call may be recorded for quality assurance purposes", is them complying with that law). However when employees sign onto their company, in their HR packet is a blurb stating that the company owns any communicati…
/r/MensRights13/05/16 03:27 PM
1

I can undersrand that view point but to be fair though. That view point doesnt stop the mass of posts about Cosby or Ghomeshi (in sure that is spelled wrong). I dont want this to become a place where a case is only talked about where guilt or innocence can be proven beyond any doubt. do you want this to become a place like the massive potsts about how they are guilty despite still not having been convicted? its why we require a standard of proof. we dont want to degrade into a cesspool where lie…
/r/MensRights13/05/16 03:12 PM
1

I dont want this story to go unnoticed by the mrm. And I find it a bit odd that this post is questioned for not being about rights when we get posts that are nothing more than, "If this were gender swapped we know the outcome would be different" or "This woman committed a horrible crime!" in here all the time with no question. i can assure you that i am personally responsible for assassinating these kinds of posts whenever i see them. I literally just killed one within the last ten minutes, and …
/r/MensRights13/05/16 02:54 PM
1

a woman not being punished for being negligent is not a mens rights issue by the very merit that men also go unpunished for negligence. this on its own is not a relative mens rights topic. From the page on moderation, but your own rules you are limiting my opinion and speech Please understand that this is not an opinion - this piece is an article. in order for this to be your opinion, we ask that you use a self post to voice said opinion. As it stands this post on its own does not constitute a m…
/r/MensRights13/05/16 02:43 PM
1

The link to this as a MR Issue is an extremely tenuous one. it raises awareness of molestation in boys, but it also fails to establish a clear rights issue, and fails to establish guilt or blame, and is simply an accusation. usually we would remove and ask you self post to explain. Since i know little about this, Can you give a write up of how this qualifies as a MR issue?
/r/MensRights13/05/16 02:28 PM
1

Sorry, speculation is not a mens rights issue. plenty of cases have resulted in mothers being jailed for this same thing. if they chose not to charge, then there was good reason for it . Example of a mother being charged for the same crime: http://www.cbs46.com/story/25938038/mother-charged-with-leaving-child-in-car Example of mother and father both not charged for the same crime: http://thefreethoughtproject.com/prosecutors-refuse-file-charges-assistant-state-attorney-husband-leaving-toddler-sw…
/r/MensRights13/05/16 02:19 PM
1

Stupid woman issue- Not a mens rights issue.
/r/MensRights13/05/16 02:08 PM
11

if he is at a company, they likely have a recording policy in place, which supersedes any laws since they are utilizing that companies phones, aka their property, they have the right to monitor and record. if they do record, have them pull the records of the call.
/r/MensRights13/05/16 02:06 PM
1

shows what you know, WE ARE THE LIZARDS.
/r/MensRights12/05/16 10:21 PM
1

That's a crap policy IMO. It effectively gives you the power to delete anything. You can claim anything is off-topic because it's defined what is and isn't off-topic, off-topic is also always changing, you expect people to follow these rules but we can't possibly know what is included in off-topic at any given moment, and to make matters worse you can simply claim your own ignorance to even more easily fit something into the off-topic category. i dont think you understand what is meant by "what …
/r/MensRights12/05/16 10:20 PM
1

Thats the thing - We dont moderate them out. the only exception to this is when its clearly TRP material. thats when we step in and say "hey, while nifty, go post this over at TRP as its not a mens rights issue". if you notice, we only killed his post over emma watson. we havent removed a single thing you or he has said outside of that issue. we dont stifle oppinions - we curate fact and topicality- which is what is required of us as moderators. We dont moderate positions out - we keep the topic…
/r/MensRights12/05/16 09:58 PM
-1

the intent of the self post is for you to explain HOW your topic relates to the MRM, because if we flag it as OFF TOPIC, that means the link is NOT CLEAR or APPARENT. Do you understand that we are giving even posts that we call off topic, the chance to be heard so long as their poster is able to put forth a viable case?
/r/MensRights12/05/16 09:55 PM
1

oh were you not aware that demonspawn is openly against women voting and holding jobs? those were the reasons i put that out there.
/r/MensRights12/05/16 09:36 PM
0

no i just pointed out that its a nifty little coincidence that two people had the same exact complaint with two others who appeared to jump on the band wagon just moments later.
/r/MensRights12/05/16 09:02 PM
5

This should tell you something. uh yea it does. usually when a group of people speaks up at the same time and about the same thing, and with a known subterfuge prone redditor, then it tells me that some like minded people are probably colluding. Then you better stop over-moderating because I've gotten a lot of private messages about people upset with you guys and some looking into what you're doing. Some people didn't realize what was going on and their eyes are being opened. If you continue lik…
/r/MensRights12/05/16 08:14 PM
1

You believe in gender roles for men, but not for women. No you see i do believe in gender roles for men, but i also believe in gender roles for women. the difference is that i believe that women have hit a point in their evolution where its time for them to develop a new norm for their gender role. We only have to look to our history books to see that this isn't the first time its happened to both men and women throughout the course of history, and wont be the last.
/r/MensRights12/05/16 07:53 PM
2

nope, we invite those people to hash it out in mod mail. since there are four complaintants right now (all of which complaining for unusually the same issue), instead of silencing you and just banning you, we collected your complaints and created a meta discussion to give the rest of the user base the opportunitiy to substantiate or debase your claims in a public forum. we litterally have four complaintants- all of which i outline as to who precisely and why within the thread. you are litterally…
/r/MensRights12/05/16 07:48 PM
2

Tradconning is a double edged sword, something we are not eager to throw ourselves on without good reason. Part of the Tradcon sword is that on one side you've got this lovely Pro hyper-masculine mentality, which IMO is perfectly fine, but on the other side of that is the male superiority/female inferiority mentality that leads to people continuing to brand us as a hate group. We have found a happy middle ground by carving away all but the necessities of MR Issues. so, lets see... when i say tra…
/r/MensRights12/05/16 07:08 PM
1

thank you for proving just why the MRM is perfectly fine where it is. I don't believe a word of you claiming that you are a tradcon after what you said above. yea thats because im not so ignorant as to not realize that i can pick and choose the best parts of things i align with. i can have both liberal and conservative views, progressive and traditionalist- holy shit i know right? a grey middle ground exists- who would have thought. Yes there is. We can Revolt, Expat, or Turtle. I'd love to disc…
/r/MensRights12/05/16 06:55 PM
2

sure any time :)
/r/MensRights12/05/16 04:52 PM
3

oh i said "i are is smart" :P
/r/MensRights12/05/16 04:50 PM
3

i r iz smat.
/r/MensRights12/05/16 04:38 PM
1

depending on your state, you may have laws that prevent that. for example you cant push out a partner in virginia, even if you are seperated. if she lives there you may have to have her forcibly evicted, which only the landlord or owner can do.
/r/MensRights12/05/16 04:28 PM
2

im sorry what does being conservative have to do with mens rights? are you stating that your viewpoint of "the old way is the best way" is better than the millions of other viewpoints expressed here in this sub reddit? in what way does conservatism act as the MR Benefactor of choice to the MRM so much more than any other viewpoint? Tradconning is a double edged sword, something we are not eager to throw ourselves on without good reason. Part of the Tradcon sword is that on one side you've got th…
/r/MensRights12/05/16 04:24 PM
1

ahh... well then... technically VAWA eliminates any kind of power you would have in a domestic altercation as a male. i reccomend that you quietly just pack and go when they arent around, and abandon all contact. doing it with them there is a recipie for disaster.
/r/MensRights12/05/16 04:06 PM

Please keep in mind that we are not a legal forum. please do not take anything our users provide as legitimate legal advice. Seek out /r/legaladvice for legitimate advice. that being said others may have similar experience that may benefit you hopefully our users can help you.
/r/MensRights12/05/16 04:01 PM
3

Shhhh theres secretly a moderator illuminati that is full of SJWs and leftists, determined to protect our lord and savior emma watson from harm on the interwebs. WE ARE THE MODINATI- ALL SHALL BE CAPTURED BY OUR PC GAZE.
/r/MensRights12/05/16 03:51 PM
2

Im kind of impressed. made the call Hours before it happened. can you see the future?
/r/MensRights12/05/16 01:31 PM
3

so by having a direct link sticky to the official discussion in the relevant place, is by some way diminishing your, albeit infinitesimal, voice of dissent? its not being hidden, if anything we are drawing as much attraction to it as possible. and housing it in an area where it will be kept for virtually ever and easily accessible.
/r/MensRights12/05/16 01:03 PM
4

to be clear, we are more than welcome to articles about emma watson and her offshore holdings, IF they are in some way relevant to mens rights. have no illusion this is about blocking negative things about her.
/r/MensRights12/05/16 01:00 PM
4

I'm sorry you feel that way, but you are the one who alluded that your up votes were indicative of you being correct... i just dispelled that illusion. oh and thats four one minute old bots, not a singular four minute bot, just for clarity.
/r/MensRights12/05/16 03:27 AM
3

i hate to break it to you but ... your 1 + Demon + Pornography + the 4 minute old alts from our serial troll that i had to ban in this thread totals up to your upvote positive count... but hey,you do you.
/r/MensRights12/05/16 03:13 AM
3

thats why the link is stickied on the main page.
/r/MensRights12/05/16 03:01 AM
3

we moved it to the Meta board. you are welcome to go there to discuss the current submeta.
/r/MensRights12/05/16 01:59 AM
2

Just because a link comes from a specific domain, does it give it a free pass. Revealed: Emma Watson named in latest Panama Papers leak Posted on May 11, 2016 by Mike Buchanan Our thanks to David for pointing us to this piece in The Spectator. David writes: No tax advantages – “personal safety” is the reason for the offshore account (translation – if you question it, you are a misogynist). Hopefully we will hear less in future from this particular Special Snowflake. This was the ENTIRE body of t…
/r/MensRights11/05/16 10:43 PM
1

You can explain it simply: "I've lost the argument." umm... i dont think it works that way. just because you want to jam your thumbs in your ears and stamp your feet screaming "IM RIGHT LALALALALALALA" does not diminish the fact that you are not correct. She is, by the accounts of the Panama Papers, possibly cheating on her taxes (this is not absolutely proven, but is suggested). That means she is not supporting the goals of the movement she is figureheading. She is, in fact, acting in detriment…
/r/MensRights11/05/16 10:43 PM
-1

Please understand that you see a FRACTION of what we remove on a daily basis. we remove about 30% of our submissions for being off topic pieces that are nothing more than posts about stupid women doing stupid shit. Just calling this next piece out because it needs to be said. THE THEME: "STUPID WOMEN" IS NOT A MENS RIGHTS ISSUE. Examples of valid mens rights issues Everything feminism. This does not include proponents of feminism's personal life actions. this would be like saying milo is wrong b…
/r/MensRights11/05/16 09:01 PM
1

i dont know how else to explain this for you... If it is off topic, as this so plainly is, then it is off topic.
/r/MensRights11/05/16 08:42 PM
0

people obviously give a fuck, but you are correct its not related to the MRM.
/r/MensRights11/05/16 08:40 PM
0

you are effectively saying that, because emma watson cheated on her taxes, anything she is associated with has no merit, and is automatically morally bankrupt and defunct. that is by definition the very core of an ad homenim attack. we aren't protecting her, condoning her actions, or censoring talk about it. However it is NOT on topic subject matter for a top level post. again if ad homenim was an acceptable form of debasing someone, we wouldnt have a leg to stand on. they could just go "lol cuz…
/r/MensRights11/05/16 08:11 PM
1

i dont think you could find a an atoms worth of pro-feminisim in the mod chamber. but thats a cool theory tho.... what tinfoil-hat model did you go with? Boat? skull cap? Sombrero?
/r/MensRights11/05/16 08:00 PM

its simple. its a logical fallacy to even bring this to the table when discussing her as a feminist. our issue with her is that shes a brainless feminist just parroting what her peers tell her - NOT the shady shit she does with her money. That's like if we were discussing milo with someone else not in the MRM and they then claim as an effort to debase his stance "well hes wrong because hes gay". what does that have to do with the topic? Emma watson is wrong, so so wrong, but her personal doings …
/r/MensRights11/05/16 07:40 PM
10

so women want to be paid more for less work? nothing new to see here. move along...
/r/MensRights11/05/16 07:23 PM
5

Stickied for visibility
/r/MensRights11/05/16 05:19 PM
1

there is a difference between an admission of guilt, and satisfying the requirements of a settlement. effectually the judge ordered that he issue an apology for his actions in lieu of pursuing charges. if you read the entirety of his attornies statement at closing it becomes evident that he was required to write this person an apology. so its not an admission of guilt or wrongdoing. its simply an apology intended to placate the offended party, and end a messy trial. These usually happen when the…
/r/MensRights11/05/16 04:53 PM
1

nah hes just pitching a fit because we didnt let him have his way. he posted shit about anti-sjw that was not focused on MR. we are not a forum for attacking all things shitty, we are a forum for addressing mens rights issues. he cant understand that keeping it on topic is not the same as censorship. its like removing the content nerd who keeps on about pokemon from the group that is clearly focused on final fantasy. both are games, both are weeb centric, but only one is on topic.
/r/MensRights11/05/16 04:31 PM
1

about damn time.
/r/MensRights11/05/16 03:07 PM
3

Hahahahah dont be silly. women cant be pedophiles. only men can be pedophiles. in fact most of the time the underage boys they are "Having sex with" their teachers, they should be thankful for it. /s
/r/MensRights11/05/16 01:32 PM
2

Funny how they direct this towards men, but i distinctly recall my last female partner doing every single one of these.
/r/MensRights11/05/16 01:27 PM
3

yes, its literally modern day debtors prison. we have women who committed statutory rape, and fornicated with children who were below the legal ages of consent, and then turn around and sue the kid they raped when they turn 18 for child support. young men turn 18 and their lives are already ruined because they owe 5 years of back child support because they knocked up a teacher when they were younger. people cant understand just how stacked the deck is against men and fathers in america.
/r/MensRights11/05/16 01:19 PM
1

Speaking officially: we muted you because you were becoming obdurate, and incapable of logical reason. you need to step back and objectively look at why we removed your posts. we removed a Small number of posts for either being internet-diarrhea, or completely off topic due to you addressing a MACROSCOPIC SCALE ISSUE in a MICROSCOPIC SCALE FORUM. PC and SJWISIM shits on everyone's plate, but those issues are not directly responsible for mens rights issues. imagine if you will that you are a blac…
/r/MensRights10/05/16 05:36 PM
1

Sorry, Fundraisers and Kickstarters are not allowed under our moderation policy. too large of a risk without any checks and balances
/r/MensRights10/05/16 04:36 PM
4

we have No issue with someone presenting PC or SJWism as a valid mens rights issue, when those things are directly influential to mens rights. E.G. :PC States that men are the devil - Ergo is MR issue. E.G : PC States islamaphobia is an issue- Ergo Not a MR issue. You cant take a macroscale issue and apply it to a microscale topic. You keep saying that we are censoring you for an ideological issue despite myself being AVIDLY against SJWs, and rarely PC (i wont go so far as to say im never PC, as…
/r/MensRights09/05/16 10:16 PM
5

As for removal...well, you leftist dipshits remove over 80% of my posts...in a nakedly ideological way. you have historically had TWO top level removed posts in the last month, and none that i can recall or find beyond that. Post 1 was in regards to "fuck Pollitical correctness" and was removed for nothing more than it not having anything to do with a relevant mens rights issue. Being overly PC and SJWism is an everyone issue- not a mens rights issue. Post 2 was a TRP/MGTOW level post about how …
/r/MensRights09/05/16 09:46 PM
7

Since you took the time to type this out, can you explain how this pertains to the MRM? you effectively go on a massive discourse on social tone, socialisim, and PC leftisim, and then add on "the mens movement" at the end of your post. I fail to see the correlation behind anything you've written and the MRM. If you care to elaborate more on how this is a mens rights issue, then please do so, but if you dont or wont, we will have to remove it. PS: I don't judge others for the choices they make in…
/r/MensRights09/05/16 08:42 PM
3

so legal sexisim then? Nothing new to see here, move along.
/r/MensRights09/05/16 04:03 PM
1

no thats me trying to get you to understand what constitutes valid content.
/r/MensRights08/05/16 01:23 PM
1

no nearly enough to be fair. islamiphobia is one of the most insane things ever dreamt up. That being said islamophobia isnt a mens rights issue. your video had about fifty percent of its content about how bad the word islamiphobia is, but failed to touch on how people are blaming eruopean men for the muslims men going on a rape spree across europe.
/r/MensRights08/05/16 01:19 PM
3

so that everything is clear- since the commentary is currently deleted: He didnt call the user in question a misogynist . the person in question interjected with "fucking sjw" in response to discourse between two separate users (the first of which had their post removed for being on the level of dirreah). He called someone misogynist for suggesting that the way someone dresses, "like whores", is to blame for them being assaulted, and then went on to say that women are incompetent, Which makes th…
/r/MensRights08/05/16 08:24 AM
2

im not sure what you are trying to communicate here - but i was responding to a user who is simply trying to insult people , and has been out of line before this. i gave him fair warning that if he didnt stop trying to abuse people on here, that i would take action.
/r/MensRights08/05/16 08:04 AM
1

if i was a god i'd just smite whoever pissed me off :P were more like an objective jury?
/r/MensRights08/05/16 06:17 AM
2

yea your fine, was just explaining to another user how he can get his content that isnt focused on MR issues to be allowed.
/r/MensRights08/05/16 06:13 AM
2

not yet at least >_>
/r/MensRights08/05/16 06:12 AM
2

magnetic resonance imaging? lol JK. i just use it as short hand for Mens rights issues. normally i type MR Issues, but i was too busy typing out about 20 mod replies.
/r/MensRights08/05/16 06:03 AM
6

Deception in dating/relationships is always a MR issue. albeit this is a small connection at best - usually deception is in regards to paternity, and children. his is about misrepresentation of self. I.E. its ok for women to fake their looks, but its not ok for a man to fake his status and the hypocrisy of that mentality.
/r/MensRights08/05/16 06:01 AM
1

read the article. its a perfect example of the paradigms between men and women, and touches several MR issues.
/r/MensRights08/05/16 05:56 AM
5

because it exemplifies the mentality of "either you nod along in agreement, or you are a misogynist" (sort of what was mentioned in your video i took down, cept that was about muslims and islamaphobia) that is running rampant in our world. it is perfectly passable as an example of a mens rights issue.
/r/MensRights08/05/16 05:55 AM
3

As hillary has announced her self as a feminist, and has put forth plans and goals of diminishing mens rights in her tenure as president, god forbid should it happen, and further seperating the mark of equality between men and women, anything pertaining to anti-hillary is by default on the topic of mens rights issues as she is probably one of the greatest adversaries we have ever seen for MR Issues.
/r/MensRights08/05/16 05:52 AM
3

its fine your upset because you think i pissed in your cheerios, but do not abuse our SubBase. Fair warning : if i get another report i will have to remove you.
/r/MensRights08/05/16 05:50 AM
2

As men are by a gross margin the primary charged party in DV occurrences, regardless of aggressor, this would bar law abiding men from owning fire arms. i suggest you read the article.
/r/MensRights08/05/16 05:46 AM
3

Objectification and stereotyping of men is a valid MR Issue.
/r/MensRights08/05/16 05:44 AM
7

maybe if you were up on current brittish politics- you would know that they have an issue with muslim immigrants right now, and men are being blamed for not protecting the women. this suggested policy would be an extension or result of that mentality, therefore it is a mens rights issue. This is an example of what i mentioned to you before. taking something that is loosely associated with a MRI, and presenting it in a way that makes it relevant to the MRM.
/r/MensRights08/05/16 05:32 AM
1

disregard him. its a frequent troll looking for attention.
/r/MensRights08/05/16 12:02 AM
2

its a troll weve been repeatedly banning for the last month or so. pay no mind
/r/MensRights08/05/16 12:00 AM
1

Dude give up the ghost.
/r/MensRights08/05/16 12:00 AM
1

sorry you feel that way. Again you are welcome to take it to mod mail if you feel like i'm treating your case special.
/r/MensRights07/05/16 07:18 PM
1

i remove it because, like any good mod, i dont selectively moderate. allowing content That i dont like, or like, that fits into the sub is called proper moderation. Selective moderation is removing content i dont like regardless of it fitting or not.
/r/MensRights07/05/16 04:25 PM
1

Bullshit. You didnt like it on a personal level right, thats why my very first comment was But damn if it didnt hit home. if you are unfamiliar with the idiom: hit home and strike home Fig. to really make sense; [for a comment] to make a very good point. Mary's criticism of my clothes hit home, so I changed. The teacher's comment struck home and the student vowed to work harder.
/r/MensRights07/05/16 04:18 PM
1

if you feel that im unfit for the job then take it up to modmail. your post is not even loosely associated with the mens rights movement and was removed under the offtopic rule.
/r/MensRights07/05/16 04:07 PM
1

Spam/Off-Topic posts will be removed. Use self-posts for related topics, justifying their relation. please see the rule bar. if you want to push an anti sjw agenda, find a way to apply it to mens rights in a self post. if you cant find a way to apply it to a mens rights issue, then take it over to /r/sjwhate
/r/MensRights07/05/16 03:59 PM
1

anti-feminisim equates to mens rights. Anti-SJWism does not EQUATE to mens rights. SJWs hate us yes, but they are not actively working and campaigning to damage mens rights. thats what feminists do. you are aware equivocation is a logical falliacy designed to get someone to agree with your stance by interchanging the meaning of two words that are distinctly different? I am not defending SJWs. I am ensuring tha the content posted here pertains to mens rights. SJWism is a systemic issue, which is …
/r/MensRights07/05/16 03:08 PM
1

sorry, but this is simply a video on politics and is not about issues pertaining to mens rights - if anything its very specifically its anti-sjw.
/r/MensRights07/05/16 03:43 AM
6

HUUUURRKk... sorry i was just chocking on my vomit there for a second. boy am i glad i didnt go to college.
/r/MensRights06/05/16 05:41 PM
1

not a mens rights issue, but damn if it didnt hit home.
/r/MensRights06/05/16 05:33 PM
1

not that i can recall. NOW's efforts are usually centered around alimony slavery, Lopsided child custody, and ensuring that the spirit of the tender years doctrine persists.
/r/MensRights06/05/16 04:53 PM
1

you know the song pyromania?. replace pyromania with pedophilia, and you have your answer. Shes a pedophile. there is no other logic to be had other than she enjoys knowing young boys on a carnal level. likely gives her a sense of power or superiority.
/r/MensRights06/05/16 04:40 PM
0

bitching about not being able to diddle teenagers as an adult on an internet forum does nothing. Q. Barry Are you bitching about not being able to diddle teens on the interwebs? A. Why Yes other barry i think you are. trying to mental gymnastics your way into a teenagers panties/boxers acomplishes accomplishes nothing. Q. So barry, are you trying to twist logic to justifiy actions that would run contrary to common practice or law? A. Sounds like mental gymnastics to me other barry. Seriously dud…
/r/MensRights06/05/16 04:35 PM
1

my statement was to express the futility of arguing about whether or not you can have sex with a teenager on the internet, and that changing the laws that be is the only recourse if you are displeased with the status quo. if you took it as me accusing you of being a pedophile, then thats on you.
/r/MensRights06/05/16 04:04 PM
22

Shoe on head always makes excellent points.
/r/MensRights06/05/16 03:33 PM
2

I didn't miss that part. That you think I did means you either didn't understand my post or didn't care to acknowledge the point I made and decided you wanted to argue something else. my bad. i figured you had to have missed it to go on a spiel like you did, you know considering i already said it was a result of the law, and didnt even bother acknowledging the morality of the law. The law is thus, and if you dont like it, change it. if you cant change it, deal with it. bitching about not being a…
/r/MensRights06/05/16 03:26 PM
5

while i agree somewhat, i dont know what the right answer is.
/r/MensRights06/05/16 02:49 PM
3

consent and culpability are two distinctly different issues, and it is completely a double standard.
/r/MensRights06/05/16 01:58 PM
11

i think you missed the part about in the eyes of the law (american at least), consensual sex with a minor can never be "consensual" our laws establish that a minor cannot consent to just about 99% of shit in our country before 18. cant smoke, cant drink until 21 (which is a totally bullshit law). the issue is NOT that a child has or does not have the agency to consent to sex, its that our laws prohibit the child from having such agency, and as a result invalidates any consent you may get. I'm no…
/r/MensRights06/05/16 01:46 PM
1

while tragic this is not a mens rights issue and will be removed. sorry.
/r/MensRights06/05/16 01:36 PM
3

you know i always try to rationalize this stuff out..... but i just cant rationalize this one any other way than shes a pedophile. Shes obviously an attractive woman, and she can attract a sexual partner of suitable age with little to no difficulty. By merit of having little difficulty in finding sex, she chose sex with a barely past pubescent boy. She knows sex with a child is illegal yet did it anyways. Ergo shes a pedophile.
/r/MensRights06/05/16 12:56 PM
15

Minors are about as able to consent as infants are. in the eyes of the law (american at least), consensual sex with a minor can never be "consensual". it is 100% of the time rape due to their inability to consent.
/r/MensRights06/05/16 12:55 PM
11

being a professional software developer for the last decade (and a hobby developer since i was 12) i can say with supreme confidence that without a doubt this is the largest clod of dreck and diatribe I've ever had the displeasure of reading regarding my career field. beautiful thing about code is that your performance is inconsequential of your gender, age, religion, or race. to allude that these things play even the slightest factor in development not only undermines their authority on the top…
/r/MensRights05/05/16 07:14 PM

Temporarily removed
/r/MensRights05/05/16 06:00 PM
3

Norfolk is a MULTITUDE of places in america. you would be hard pressed to find a state in america with out a Norfolk city/township/county. and most of them have jails. its a reasonable mistake.
/r/MensRights05/05/16 05:36 PM
1

I've asked the other mods to weigh in on this, as i don't want to be unfair to you. I feel like this post undermines everything we stand for and fight against, and would be horridly damaging to the MRM if it gained any traction from our.... less than savory members. i don't want you to take it personally, or think that I've got it out for you, i just genuinely feel that this content does not fit in the MR sub.
/r/MensRights05/05/16 04:20 PM
3

i dont think anyone should give a rats ass about anyone elses preference for the D or P. if you are fine with both, then have both- but dont judge someone else for only wanting one or the other.
/r/MensRights05/05/16 04:16 PM
1

No. This is just another garbage feminisim driven piece. you cannot have a flexible home life, and still make the same amount of money as someone who prioritizes work. you are literally demanding same pay for less money and it does not work like that. End of story.
/r/MensRights05/05/16 02:51 PM
2

to be fair NDT is probably one of the most brilliant minds in the public science Scene.
/r/MensRights05/05/16 02:45 PM
1

Not a Mens Rights issue. we arent here to applaud actual rape.
/r/MensRights05/05/16 02:40 PM
1

lil too inflammatory /u/DirtGotWet. hes specifically saying that he has to follow proper procedure - which is always a good course of action.
/r/MensRights05/05/16 02:34 PM
29

get a picture so we can share in the outrage of condoning female on male violence.
/r/MensRights05/05/16 01:55 PM
1

Again, our moderation policy is that our rules apply to our mods. if you think ive made a mistake or violated our rules- feel free to take it up to mod mail and have the other mods weigh in. Have a good night.
/r/MensRights05/05/16 12:59 AM
1

The reason I say you did so wrongly is because the topic was receiving upvotes from the community and so was clearly a popular topic with support. the only reason this had even a single upvote is because you sensationalized the title of the article to make it appear as if it were about a lazy woman exercising her privlige VS a woman turning down a forced placed job in the prostitution industry. However I am just wondering if you are capable of admitting a mistake all by yourself when no one is f…
/r/MensRights05/05/16 12:36 AM
14

"we'll register for the draft when we get equal pay argument". So youll go register now then? would have been the proper rebuttal.
/r/MensRights04/05/16 05:20 PM
1

While men do make up the majority of Homeless, this is still distinctly not a mens rights issue, and is a homelessness issue. conflating the two is like saying Because the majority of criminals are black, Crime is a black issue. Crime is a crime issue- distinctly separate from black issues; the Tie in of crime to black issues would be the rate of incarceration of blacks. the Tie into Mens rights of Homelessness, is that the majority of them are male, and go unsupported. a rule that unilaterally …
/r/MensRights04/05/16 03:18 PM
1

i have never read a more rage generating story in my life. not only did she beat an infant to death, she hid the evidence, and then blamed her teenage son for it? When will the world understand that Evil knows no gender?
/r/MensRights04/05/16 03:10 PM

Not a mens rights issue. Panhandling and other homeless laws are a distinctly seperate issue.
/r/MensRights04/05/16 02:52 PM
10

now kids, do we know why an apartheid is wrong?
/r/MensRights04/05/16 02:47 PM
2

i dont think she gets that the vast majority of people making these are male, who obviously would prefer to interact with a female.
/r/MensRights04/05/16 02:03 PM
1

more dangerous if anything. think about it. if people protest this means that they are organized. if they are organized, this means they are dedicated. if you have a dedicated group, all they need are some guns and a big enough catalyst to set them off to bring the entire system to its knees. Speech is the most powerful agent of change on this planet. its why people are so desperate to control it.
/r/MensRights04/05/16 01:13 PM
1

if you feel that i am unjustly censoring you, you are welcome to take it to mod mail and have another mod weigh in.
/r/MensRights04/05/16 12:56 PM
1

are men being forced to work in the brothels? No? well shit bro i guess thats not a special protection afforded to women. Brothel work is non-compulsory.
/r/MensRights04/05/16 02:21 AM
1

not being forced into a prostitution workplace is NOT a special protection.
/r/MensRights04/05/16 02:10 AM
1

german law also dictates that women cannot be forceplaced into brothel work when on unemployment.
/r/MensRights04/05/16 01:15 AM
11

story still breaks my heart every time i see it reposted :/
/r/MensRights03/05/16 11:09 PM
1

exactly. you have the right to protest, however it is tied up behind so many rules and regulations that if you DONT get a permit, you either cant protest anywhere worth protesting, or cant protest with any significant numbers.
/r/MensRights03/05/16 10:18 PM
6

i guess someone forgot to tell them that you cant abuse a tool. Can they not seperate that robotic companions would be about as close in relation to a living breathing "Female" as a hammer is? its not until AI crosses from being "AI" to artifical sentience, that that distinction will ever be necessary.
/r/MensRights03/05/16 10:13 PM
1

you mean this one? the one that sources out everything at the bottom of the document? magically its wrong because of where it came from, not by merit of its content (which mirrors the content you yourself are so desperate to rely on). http://www.streetlaw.org/Documents/Document/Document/1037 Unless youve edited it yet again. sorry but i dont edit my sources unless i specifically call it ou. Kind of like The one i call out here? im going to assume you didnt read the part in bold. aside from VA, e…
/r/MensRights03/05/16 10:01 PM
1

Virginia Protest permit rules - ACLU NY Protest Permit Rules - ACLU CA Protest Permit rules -Straight from the Los Angeles Police department written with the advisement of the ACLU. FL Protest Permit Rules - ACLU Texas protest Permit rules -ACLU My source was from the aclu. Not the thestreets. But keep trying. Some of the stuff you did mention was from the aclu. aside from VA, everything was sourced from the ACLU. went ahead and re-sourced the VA From the ACLU as well since a sourced paper wasn'…
/r/MensRights03/05/16 07:39 PM
1

pretty much. plus an ordinance that doesnt explicitly block your rights, isnt unconstitutional. I.E. A noise ordinance can prevent your protest from being held within certian areas of the city, or an occupancy ordinance can prevent you from holding it in certian parks. doesnt bar your right to protest, just regulates where you can and cant.
/r/MensRights03/05/16 07:10 PM
0

did you not see the sourced info from the very websites you yourself used to make your claim?
/r/MensRights03/05/16 06:49 PM
0

did you not see the part where i cited the specific parts of five major states that specify the instances and criteria for protest permits being required?
/r/MensRights03/05/16 05:56 PM
-1

Dont need to. the onus is on you to prove your claims, and i've provided ample sourcing showing you are wrong in my prior posts. Goodday mate.
/r/MensRights03/05/16 05:38 PM
1

less talking, more marching.
/r/MensRights03/05/16 05:15 PM
-1

Whatever you say bro. go ahead and march a pro pedophilia protest down mainstreet in your city with a significant number of participants (15-20+) with out a permit and watch how quickly the cops shut that down. Go do it solo and watch how quickly you get shut down and then thrown in jail for telling the cop he cant stop you from protesting. I dare you. Make sure you record it so i can have a good laugh.
/r/MensRights03/05/16 05:05 PM
1

Again Not Wrong. its written right in what you have sourced. certain types of events require permits. A singular person standing on the sidewalk does not constitute an organized Protest. a legitimate protest of numerable people (generally more than fifteen in most states) however is subject to both that states rules, and that specific citys ordinances. For example you require a protest permit if you wish to march with more than 20 people in VA, and you cannot occupy a side walk if you would inhi…
/r/MensRights03/05/16 04:55 PM
1

not wrong. A protest permit or parade permit is permission granted by a governmental agency for a demonstration to be held in a particular venue at a particular time. Failing to obtain a permit may lead to charges of parading without a permit. The requirement of a permit is sometimes denounced as an infringement of free speech,[1] as permits are denied on spurious grounds or protestors are corralled into free speech zones. Permits are sometimes denied on grounds that the protest will create a se…
/r/MensRights03/05/16 04:42 PM
3

god that was glorious
/r/MensRights03/05/16 02:06 PM
1

thats odd... i recall the doj statistics being a 50/50 split for drunk driving.
/r/MensRights03/05/16 01:56 PM
2

i believe the capital offense is a relic of a more racially motivated directive.
/r/MensRights03/05/16 01:52 PM
1

virtually every state in america requires you to register and have your protest approved.
/r/MensRights03/05/16 01:49 PM
4

i agree with the Idea he was trying to convey, and i agree with the method, however he takes it too far when he moves from education to punishment. he personalized it far to much, from gloating about his child's blood on the wall, to the "stop crying". He goes beyond trying to communicate and educate his son at first to just battering him - which to a point is needed some times. However that is a point he shouldn't have crossed. i honestly think that this is an important lesson for any son to le…
/r/MensRights02/05/16 05:58 PM
5

may want to put a summary of the root issue at the top of your post had to go like half way down before it became apparent.
/r/MensRights02/05/16 05:42 PM
3

as bad of an idea this would be.... i find it hilarious and it would get an updoot from me >_>
/r/MensRights02/05/16 05:40 PM
1

male disposability and infanticide arent really in the same category. nobody expect a male baby to throw himself on the proverbial grenade. male disposability comes when they have started to define their gender role, generally once they have hit puberty. the reason the argument for male disposability doesnt hold water is for the simple fact that places like china used to participate in mass Infant gendercide. infanticide should be considered as a gender-neutral offense.
/r/MensRights02/05/16 04:44 PM
2

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/4fik0p/when_mommy_hit_daddy_everybosy_laughed_now_she/d29czb5 this comment chain has the source in the first post, and then several discussions of value about the merits and cons of the data.
/r/MensRights02/05/16 04:39 PM
2

its not like the writer just whipped out this unthinkable tale and went 'welp insert disposable male infant here', monarchical infanticide is simply a common element in this thematic setting. i believe i say that it does in my earlier post. Infanticide is not only an issue with incredibly low awareness, its also something that goes largely unpunished in our world. The author talking about this is not something that should be met with outcry, but with accolades, as it is a service to all for them…
/r/MensRights02/05/16 03:02 PM
1

If you cant tell, im a MRA who understands that Men are equally capable of both magnanimous solicitude and vehement ruination. For every video we see of a woman thrashing a man, you can be assured there is a man flogging a woman. For every video of a woman doing a virtuous deed, there is a man engaging in solicitude. Ultimately Men and women are incontrovertibly equal in in our capacity for rancor and magnanimity, our wrath and solicitude, our affection and enmity. the primary reason that the MR…
/r/MensRights02/05/16 03:00 PM
2

only if complaining about the first instance had any merit to begin with. Rape happens. Talking about rape, or portraying rape, especially in this setting, should not be met with anything other than acceptance. To deny that rape happens or to cry out about portraying it serves to do nothing more than damage awareness of it, and lessen the impact that the writer was trying to deliver. The world has never been a pretty rose colored place. there are malevolent men and women in this world who will d…
/r/MensRights02/05/16 02:43 PM
3

there shouldnt have been outrage to either of them. its a work of fiction based on medieval monarchical society, and those things did happen, even the incest. to get upset because someone made a work of fiction around that, is asinine. That is like getting upset because someone made a work of fiction around the slave era of america, its not like it didnt happen and getting upset because its incorporated into literature based in that era is a fools errand. there should be no outrage for either of…
/r/MensRights02/05/16 02:20 PM
1

it would appear legitimate. Likely the reason why the committee is so unconcerned with this is because it likely fell below the margin of error per machine. for testing 5% of the votes, they would have to test 100,000 Votes in total. According to their findings, Bernie received 200 some odd votes LESS than what was manually tabulated, and Hillary received 40 More votes than what was manually tabulated. both of these fall in the less than 0.01% bracket, which is generally an acceptable margin of …
/r/MensRights02/05/16 02:16 PM
8

i dont know that there should be outrage about this.... its both writers choice, and an apt portrayal of the subterfuge and strife that existed as a result of Monarchical societies. heirs and heiresses were killed all the time to assert claims to a throne. its not like the writer just whipped out this unthinkable tale and went 'welp insert disposable male infant here', monarchical infanticide is simply a common element in this thematic setting.
/r/MensRights02/05/16 01:57 PM
1

on item three: women ALWAYS loose their shit. it is always in their purse no matter how much they insist it is not. i grew up in a household of five women. in the purse, every goddamned time, despite ample protests of said object being lost forever.
/r/MensRights02/05/16 01:33 PM
3

This isnt about girls being bad and the source of all the worlds ails. this is about showing that girls are every bit as capable of violence as men are, and we either need to be enforcing our rules and customs across both genders, or not at all.
/r/MensRights02/05/16 01:13 PM
1

in virtually all states domestic violence becomes an issue of the state. if police were called and then didn't get involved they are being derelict in their duty.
/r/MensRights02/05/16 01:09 PM
7

VA, DC, NY, NJ, GA are all areas i can attest through experience to them being one of the largest activists groups actively blocking any kind of alimony reform.
/r/MensRights02/05/16 01:02 PM
3

good gravy.
/r/MensRights29/04/16 07:25 PM
0

you are conflating the perception of a religious group with the actuality of that group by unilaterally applying the absolute worst fringe examples of that religion to the entirety of it. On top of that you are drawing a parallel to feminisim effectively saying Feminisim is the same as Radical Islam.
/r/MensRights29/04/16 04:03 PM
0

Removing this post. its not MRM Material. Nothing Personal OP, but this doesnt have a place here.
/r/MensRights29/04/16 03:36 PM
2

Oh hi i want to be a fatter lazier piece of shit and get paid for it, and in the process lessen the value of having a child! fucking people make me feel rage some days.
/r/MensRights29/04/16 01:10 PM

Gonna be removing this for the editorialized upvote bait Title. 'Sex & Relax': Job Center Apologizes for Offer in Bordello Is the official title of the piece. It's happened again: A German job center has tried to line up a position for a young woman in a brothel. The job was just serving drinks, but the issue has rekindled the debate about how far the government should go to get people back in the workforce. Is the Call out. The way you've written this is that she refused a legitimate job while …
/r/MensRights29/04/16 12:57 PM
2

keep in mind we arent a legal advice forum, so please dont take anything under advisement from the userbase regarding laws, If you need that head over to /r/LegalAdvice if you want some legit advice on laws. Other than that i hope some people can give you their tales.
/r/MensRights29/04/16 12:33 PM
1

least the way he died wasnt too shitty.
/r/MensRights28/04/16 08:54 PM
1

oolya! Bah! Pwegh! Pwegh! Oolyambwooba! Yahn Chass Solo chung
/r/MensRights28/04/16 08:42 PM
19

of course not. 120k/year is nowhere near enough. dude i would brick my pants if i was making that many dollars per year.
/r/MensRights28/04/16 08:16 PM
4

so a real live version of "peter-assment" then? i saw rage when lois went "HAHAHAHA Peter you cant sexually harass a man!!" in that episode. funny... i can see that rage again after reading this. rage is such a unique color. almost like an aneurysim blowing out into my eyesocket.
/r/MensRights28/04/16 08:01 PM
7

ah, sorry i didnt have my Feminist reading glasses on. thank you for the translation.
/r/MensRights28/04/16 07:59 PM
1

Just a warning to everyone involved to stop this exchange here. One of you is being provocative, and the other inflammatory. knock it off please. (i saw the commentary about faggot dying in a fire blah blah blah before it was deleted). The fact is that people expect the internet to be a massive hugzone that glamorizes and lauds them, unfortunately the complete opposite is true. the internet is a steaming cesspit of garbage that everyone spews their own individual shit into. if you decide to step…
/r/MensRights28/04/16 07:42 PM
3

uhm... hi. welcome to the internet, you seem new here? i dont know if you knew this or not, but the internet is pretty much the antithesis of a "nice place". sorry, but i guess now that you are here you might as well bend over and prepare for your Inaugural Reaming ceremony.
/r/MensRights28/04/16 07:34 PM
14

unless im misreading the synopsis, the share the pain plan would ensure that both the mother and father live at comparable income thresholds post divorce, so no more mother lives fat while the father lives in dearth. i dont see how thats a bad thing? does anyone have an indepthth review of this stance? i feel like the stance communicated might be off point.
/r/MensRights28/04/16 07:31 PM
1

Removed- Not a MRI.
/r/MensRights28/04/16 07:15 PM
3

shoe0nhead does a good piece on the definition of feminisim defense.
/r/MensRights28/04/16 06:55 PM
3

i just made an enormous vomiting/retching sound right in the middle of my office. i turned several heads. I managed to abate the odd stares by going "sorry i got Hillary'd". I received a multitude of silent nods of approval as they all returned to work. Edit- the general opinion in my office space is that Hillary is a cancer that will set america back decades. not that anyone supports trump (at least not openly lol) for that matter.
/r/MensRights28/04/16 06:38 PM
2

The feels. Also thank you for using Np; this is one of the few times i would even go so far as to bend the NP only rule since its not a brigading effort but a genuine man in need of support due to issues that we repeatedly face as mens rights issues
/r/MensRights28/04/16 05:12 PM
2

by your oh so dainty oh so weak overlords. The right for a child to not fetch and carry for the entitled o-beasts of the primary education indoctrination system. by your very satement you are implying that all women are entitled weak overlords that men must serve.
/r/MensRights27/04/16 02:54 PM
2

i believe i explain why in the next sentence?
/r/MensRights26/04/16 10:51 PM
1

i think we have several people, myself included, who would be more than willing to participate. A suggestion would be that you should pose your questions within your post beforehand, so that people know both what they are speaking to and have an opportunity to source their arguments for you. As this is an internet interaction the rule "pics or it didnt happen" applies only with "source or it didnt happen".
/r/MensRights26/04/16 09:56 PM
1

Theres a multitude of topics you can go for, some common ones, and far less prone to controversy are Male Incarceration rate Male suicide rates Societal view of the disposable Male Lack of Societal support structure for Males
/r/MensRights26/04/16 08:27 PM
1

more power to you then >:) i have an expansive repotire of sources if you need anything. just give me a talking point and i can source the shit out of it if its legit.
/r/MensRights26/04/16 07:42 PM
2

A few things to consider If this is for college, and going to a Feminist professor Dont. while standing up and having a voice is all good, this is both your money and your education. dont risk it to fight a fruitless battle. Pick a better battle. you may not be wrong, but professors and future professors can just laugh you out of their classes and fail you if you have a stance that isnt the status quo. terrible i know. if this is for Lower Schools Have at it haus. more power to you. Dont get me …
/r/MensRights26/04/16 06:52 PM
1

unfortunately NOT helping them is how it gets worse. going out of your way to help people is the number one way to get people to think more highly of not only you, but of your gender or race. E.G. i am a white guy living in a predominantly black area, and whites are viewed extremely poorly. This past blizzard i went out of my way to help my neighbors get unstuck or get out of the back-roads we live on, and that made them view me for a person, not just the white guy, and now i am on a friendly ba…
/r/MensRights26/04/16 06:43 PM
2

much like its not mens fault for women feeling insecure in public (Im afraid to go out at night), its not womens fault for you feeling too insecure in public to help someone. its your own fault for letting a percieved notion influence how you feel and act.
/r/MensRights26/04/16 06:22 PM
5

the way this reads is as if you are suggesting that MRM members are potentially mentally handicapped/disabled by merit of valuing logic over emotion? i really hope that isnt the message you were trying to convey because it couldnt be farther from the truth. My friend, what you are describing, that is called being male. As a very large whole men arent lacking in empathy in the slightest, however there comes a point when logic and reason outweigh Empathy and emotion, To let your empathy and emotio…
/r/MensRights26/04/16 05:05 PM
1

never fear. i've set up a page parser to dump the page if any changes are made and include a changelog summary. I'll have the newest versions on a nice personal server where it wont ever disappear.
/r/MensRights26/04/16 04:57 PM

This has been added to the Wiki under resources, and has also been added to the Sidebar Under FAQs for anyone who needs it for future reference. Thanks for all the hard work /u/Dakru you are a true Defender of men.
/r/MensRights26/04/16 04:56 PM
16

nobody would even dream of saying this isnt a Mens rights issue. she Assumed he could handle it because he was male Expected him to risk himself because he was male Disregarded his welfare because he was male. this is exactly the kind of thing the MRM exists to promote awareness about. tho.... your post tone is a little confrontational- probably tone it down a bit? its certianly ok to be upset, but acting as if its an all women issue isnt the answer. much like not all men, not all women is also …
/r/MensRights26/04/16 04:47 PM
4

what was your post content?
/r/MensRights26/04/16 04:15 PM
1

right. which is why if you correct the data it shows a hard 15% of all cases with sufficient evidence for trial, are false claims. then the incorporated 10% variance covers for those that are false, but dont have enough exculpatory for the defendant and inculpatory evidence for the accuser. it could potentially be higher, but that would be above the standard deviation for False inprisonment, and would be highly unlikely.
/r/MensRights26/04/16 12:48 PM
2

she may have been citing the Lisak figures erroneously. those are the results of the lisak paper, and when you correct for the erroneous data in their paper its actually closer to 15-25% of all accusations with enough evidence to be proven falsified or legitimate are falsified.
/r/MensRights26/04/16 04:17 AM
1

definitely a good idea to consult an attorney before creating anything that might broach confidentiality and rape shield laws- especially if you are going to report on things in other countries too.
/r/MensRights25/04/16 04:27 PM
1

Repost. Give it more than a week before reposing :/ Gonna be removing this, because its apparent that this is just a karma farm for you at this point. you've reposted this every few days looking to farm some easy karma.
/r/MensRights25/04/16 02:54 PM
1

in most rape accusations, namely in the uk, the identity of the plaintiff is protected regardless of outcome, and often times in america its protected via a multitude of rape shield laws (see vawa). Rule of thumb- if you cant get their name from the public court records, you cant publish it.
/r/MensRights25/04/16 02:47 PM
1

yea, their name is fine as long as it was publicly released by another news source.
/r/MensRights25/04/16 04:01 AM
1

thats wierd. mod queue doesnt show it. go ahead and pm me a permalink.
/r/MensRights25/04/16 04:00 AM
1

hit the report button if you see stuff like that.
/r/MensRights24/04/16 11:07 PM
1

absolutely- its encouraged.
/r/MensRights24/04/16 11:07 PM
2

we could allow it to be referenced in the sub as long as it doesnt publicize personal information about those people who made the false accusation. E.G. it can talk about the crime, and the accusation, but it cant say "she lives here" type things, or link to their social profiles, anonymous or other. also they would need to be public cases- we cant advertise protected parties. Just a forewarning so your endavors dont end up getting you in trouble (not a threat btw, just info); we had someone try…
/r/MensRights24/04/16 04:43 PM
1

were not tone policing. if something is blatantly inciteful and looks like its trollbait, we arent letting it through. other than that, nothing else is being blocked. We issued SEVERAL warnings to a specific user to not post his doxxing website, or advertise it. we removed and warned him about five times, and eventually banned him for it since he was pretty much giving us the old 'fuck off'. he got disgruntled and somehow imagines that hes doing a social justice and thinks that somehow miraculou…
/r/MensRights24/04/16 01:12 AM
2

i just got done whipping up metadata on the whole thing, turns out his efforts are nothing more than a drop in the ocean.
/r/MensRights22/04/16 07:43 PM
-1

also worker1 helmet flew to the left and can still be seen there- worker 2's helmet is to the right.
/r/MensRights22/04/16 07:33 PM
3

no idea. at first they started mining for hate posts, then they moved to pushing a doxxing website- which we banned him for, and now hes spampaging through the sub with hate bait again.
/r/MensRights22/04/16 07:16 PM
2

Play nice you two. We still dont know enough how HPV interacts with males, however studies and commonsense both point to men not just being carriers of HPV, and are potentially effected by it.
/r/MensRights22/04/16 07:12 PM
7

yep the ceiling most certianly crushed the other guy, and another worker falls from the ceiling where he was standing... he is uber dead.
/r/MensRights22/04/16 04:37 PM
71

i think he might be. it almost looks like another worker fell from the ceiling >_>
/r/MensRights22/04/16 04:16 PM
8

oh im familiar with that level of crazy.........
/r/MensRights22/04/16 02:46 PM
2

i think the distinction levels are Female Weight@5'0 height Male Definition Female Definition 100 Thin Sick 120 Skinny Sick 130 average Average 140 Chubby Average 160 Fat Average 200 Obese Curvy 250+ Landwhale Chubby atleast thats the experience i've found with online dating. rule of thumb is that generally an inch in height can equal 2-5 pounds; a 6'0 average weight would be 164-180. Also technically the medical definition of obese starts at 160 on this scale for a 5'0 woman.
/r/MensRights22/04/16 01:13 PM
8

yea... been on /r/mensrights for years.... never once have i seen it...
/r/MensRights21/04/16 09:02 PM
2

Another one bites the dust
/r/MensRights21/04/16 08:51 PM
1

To the sound of the beat
/r/MensRights21/04/16 08:51 PM
1

Out of the doorway the bullets rip
/r/MensRights21/04/16 08:48 PM
1

Are you hanging on the edge of your seat?
/r/MensRights21/04/16 08:46 PM
1

Are you ready? Hey are you ready for this?
/r/MensRights21/04/16 08:46 PM
1

Machine guns ready to go
/r/MensRights21/04/16 08:44 PM
7

if its a repost in the /r/mensrights then i've never seen it prior to this.
/r/MensRights21/04/16 08:32 PM
1

Ain't no sound but the sound of his feet
/r/MensRights21/04/16 07:18 PM
1

With the brim pulled way down low
/r/MensRights21/04/16 07:16 PM
1

Steve walks warily down the street
/r/MensRights21/04/16 07:11 PM
11

who?
/r/MensRights21/04/16 06:08 PM
1

I've read and screenshot your comment saying that even my acceptable posts are banned just on principle because u don't like me. We specifically stated you are being banned because you are violating the rules of reddit- Specifically evading bans.
/r/MensRights21/04/16 05:27 PM
33

there are no words for this video.
/r/MensRights21/04/16 04:29 PM
2

most homes are designed with female toilets to save space. in larger homes you will see male toilets.
/r/MensRights21/04/16 04:24 PM
3

my first thought was "dude get the hand sanitizer ASAP"
/r/MensRights21/04/16 02:53 PM
2

he is SOL on getting the money back. NJ will side with the mother, simply because she has the impenetrable "oh i didnt know" defense.
/r/MensRights21/04/16 02:45 PM
7

Child can worry about what is wrong with his penis; often ashamed of it he will wonder either way can confirm. i had to wonder why the skin just under the glans would rip and tear every time i had an erection. it was embarassing as a child to have to ask my mother why my penis was bleeding because they had cut me so shallow that there wasnt enough skin left, and now it was stretching to the ripping point and reducing me to tears.
/r/MensRights21/04/16 02:34 PM
5

By the way, to all men out there who are not yet circumcised, are you willing and man enough to let this pretty nurse cut your skin? Will you have the guts and courage to face the Tuli Nurse from Davao? god damnit. i just got done cleaning the vomit off of my keyboard and this shit comes along. (Reaches for the Bleach)
/r/MensRights21/04/16 02:26 PM
3

actually there are male and female toilets, and they are litterally designed for both penises and vaginas respectively. The bowls on male toilets are elongated and deeper so that when we do sit down, our junk isnt mashed up against the front of the bowl, causing not only an uncomfortable bathroom trip, but an unsanitary one. How you can identify the toilet type is simple. female toilets are circular- O shaped or have a shorter U Shaped seat, males are Ovular or a much longer U shaped seat. Sourc…
/r/MensRights21/04/16 02:17 PM
8

we removed "fighting" from schools, and removed an incredibly important part of male development in the process. you should absolutely have your boy taught a self defense art. without them learning how to control themselves at a young age through fighting with others, they eventually grow into a person who doesnt know their strength Cant control their anger cant defend themselves
/r/MensRights21/04/16 02:12 PM
2

ill let you in on a little secret.... the women that can get sex when they want it, think about sex just as much as men do. theres a reason why the female personal Stimulation market is so prosperous - its not because they buy them to look at them, its because All day long they dream about sex.
/r/MensRights21/04/16 02:06 PM
3

scientific fact men think about sex 90% of the time. yep, and so do women who can have sex on the regular. the ones who find that statistic apalling are the ones who arent able to get any on the regular.
/r/MensRights21/04/16 02:04 PM
0

the thing is that a judge wont order a retrial unless reasonable exculpatory evidence is discovered.
/r/MensRights21/04/16 01:55 PM
1

its someone who was banned for promoting a doxxing website, and is now spamming alts when we banned him for spamming the Doxxing website after we warned him not to. so now even if they were posting content for legitimate things, we cant allow it out of principle.
/r/MensRights21/04/16 01:08 PM
1

u trollin bro?
/r/MensRights21/04/16 12:34 AM
1

you are repeatedly banned because you are continuing to evade bans.
/r/MensRights20/04/16 11:33 PM
1

yep, but you can rest assured that if its legitimate it will stay. we don't censor here- we only purge things that either aren't MRM related, blatant trolling, or violate the rules of reddit.
/r/MensRights20/04/16 08:53 PM
1

Dun Dun Dun Another one bites the dust.
/r/MensRights20/04/16 08:51 PM
1

everything that trips any flags.
/r/MensRights20/04/16 08:43 PM
4

Approving this so you can see my reply: Just to clarifiy, its really no more work than i already do- its just prioritizing the posts for me to look at to make sure you and your plethora of alts you keep spamming get banned within a few seconds of you having made the post.
/r/MensRights20/04/16 08:42 PM

Approved; but keep it civil; i will remove this thread if it goes south simply because we are amidst a trolling spree. Keep in mind that there is a vast canyon between what the MRM is and what TRP is- TRP is only ever associated with the MRM Because we are both mens focal groups and people erroneously make that association. it would be like saying the KKK and the black panthers are the same thing because they were racial focal groups.
/r/MensRights20/04/16 08:18 PM
5

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/4dbe0o/psa_regarding_posts_of_questionable_content_from/ this old sticky has the basics of what the issue is.
/r/MensRights20/04/16 05:20 PM

dont worry, were on it and have been on it. you are seeing about the 1% of the stuff we dont catch right away, or gets through because its not a direct violation of our rules. this has been going on for the last month. See the old sticky for details
/r/MensRights20/04/16 04:52 PM
1

God what did i spend a thousand dollars on this POS for then ;_;
/r/MensRights20/04/16 03:20 PM
3

hmmm so thats a difficult one to source. trust me i'd love nothing more than a database backing my claims up, but this is something ive found out from talking to hundreds of men who engaged in custody battles across america. there are no outright laws (barring illinois/indianna) that specifically ban men from getting custody, its more that the standing practices and policies are so geared against men that any logical attorney who isnt trying to line their pockets with gold, will tell the father …
/r/MensRights20/04/16 03:07 PM
1

a felon can get custody if he has served his sentence. once a felon always a felon in america sadly.
/r/MensRights20/04/16 02:57 PM
1

not sure if sass or serious >_> If sass- sorry i offended, but theres no accurate statistical data supporting your claim. it doesnt mean its not true, but its not a conclusion that can be drawn from this study for the reasons i pointed out If serious - thanks?
/r/MensRights20/04/16 02:49 PM
3

men are more likely to commit severe violence As a personal aside on this topic: for anyone who has not experienced white hot rage, i can personally attest to how destructive a man can be when it happens. people make jokes about "hulking out", or 'seeing red', and they aren't far from the truth. Men are far more likely to be pushed to the point where their brain completely shuts off anything but their most primal instincts, simply because we are physically engineered that way. I am speaking from…
/r/MensRights20/04/16 02:14 PM
1

comically i own /r/sexcontracts...... it was made with the intent of making spoof posts about California proposed "encounter contracts". its sad that one day we may need to thumbprint people prior to making the sexy times.
/r/MensRights20/04/16 02:01 PM
2

but sillymod.... CRT is the devil >_> you should be using 4k IPS pannels!
/r/MensRights20/04/16 01:57 PM
2

this is not a MRM issue... but its touching none the less. wanting a son as much as i do makes me want to let it stay purely out of feels. >_>
/r/MensRights20/04/16 01:54 PM
1

it would face some legal hurdles with one party and two party consent laws for recordings.
/r/MensRights20/04/16 01:40 PM
1

actually... to be quite frank and fair on this- its not that they are less likely, its that they have less availability to statistically. part of the reason statistically men are so low on the abuse ratings is that they simply dont have the exposure to children at the levels that women and step fathers do. what i mean by this is that, fifty percent of couples are divorced- this means half of all two parent children are with their mother only, and the father has no availability to abuse the child…
/r/MensRights20/04/16 01:39 PM
2

Dirty little little spammer? Fuckoff u cunt! The very first post I put up was an essay of my turn from a feminist to a misogynist because of the sheer number of violent assaults I have survived through club security work and the subsequent reaction of having women laugh at me when I complained. Where is the spam in that dyke? i read that post, and honestly it was a troll post designed to elicit rage from our commentators. if i remember correctly your verbatim post was "you are a gay man working …
/r/MensRights20/04/16 01:36 PM
2

social autopsy shouldn't be allowed by reddits own rules- we have no power to act as administrators outside of our own subreddit, and therefore cant enforce it on this website. if you are against it, speak out to the reddit admins. we will continue to remove any links or promotion for this website, not as a censorship, but as a thing that ensures our survival as a sub reddit.
/r/MensRights20/04/16 01:04 PM
2

he was a ton until we started banning every comment about his database.
/r/MensRights20/04/16 12:59 PM
10

source for what? if you are looking for the four states, its ohio, Texas, north/south dakota that have slightly more fair laws.
/r/MensRights19/04/16 09:47 PM
29

and this is the kind of thing the MRM exists to change.
/r/MensRights19/04/16 08:54 PM
7

the world has a way of forgetting embarrassing things about women. like that one time that one woman killed her kid, hid it in the pool, and then got off scott free. asked a multitude of people to call her out by name without googling it, and they couldnt, but they could crack jokes about the OJ trials all damn day.
/r/MensRights19/04/16 08:46 PM
10

heres a response to someone else asking for the stats let me dig through my post history for the actual breakdown of the full study (its like 3 months back).
/r/MensRights19/04/16 08:41 PM
3

no problems!
/r/MensRights19/04/16 08:38 PM
17

Who Are the Perpetrators? Perpetrators of child abuse or neglect are most often the child’s own parents. According to NCANDS, in 2005, 79.4 percent of perpetrators were parents and 6.8 percent were other relatives. The largest remaining categories of perpetrators were the unmarried partner of a child’s parent (3.8 percent) and other perpetrators (4.1 percent). In 3.6 percent of child maltreatment cases the perpetrators were missing or unknown. In under 1 percent of child maltreatment cases the p…
/r/MensRights19/04/16 08:36 PM
18

the distinction is made within the statistics for step parents. even when culling steps from the statistics, the percentages do not deviate much for the overall look, however the physical and sexual abuse rates go way down for both kinds of step parents. i have a breakdown of it all somewhere if i can find it in my post history.
/r/MensRights19/04/16 08:29 PM
54

which falls back to those men being advised by their attorneys that its an impossible battle and waste of resources to fight. barring four states it is impossible to win custody over the mother of a child without one of the following being true Incarcerated Felon Drug dealer/on drugs (and charged) Mother abdicates.
/r/MensRights19/04/16 08:25 PM
75

which is quickly countered by the 50% divorce rate with 95% female custody award :)
/r/MensRights19/04/16 08:17 PM
24

Havent we banned you a mountain of times for pushing that violent female Doxxing database? yea its all over your profile -_- can you give it a break? we cant allow it because of the reddit rules. please stop.
/r/MensRights19/04/16 07:24 PM
29

Thanks VAWA!
/r/MensRights19/04/16 07:22 PM
307

this is nothing to laugh about or make light of. this is an extremely REAL thing- women are responsible for 60% of all child abuse; 40% of all child abuse is perpetrated by the mother alone- where as a mere 40% of child abuse is perpetrated by men, with no more than 20% of child abuse being perpetrated by the father alone. (for anyone wondering why the stats dont line up- there is overlap- 40% of all child abuse is solo mother, 20% of child abuse is solo father, the remaining 40% is mother and f…
/r/MensRights19/04/16 07:20 PM
1

no problem! theres some other common sense stuff in there, but theres also some issues with it, like the accused not having a right to be given a defender.
/r/MensRights19/04/16 05:08 PM
2

to specify the college is obligated to report any rape claims within 48 hours, unless the accuser/victim opts out via written notice. if they opt out the school cannot take any form of measures against the accused.
/r/MensRights19/04/16 04:45 PM
1

SEC. 164. DUE PROCESS REQUIREMENTS FOR INSTITUTIONAL DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS. (a) Due Process Rights.--Each institution of higher education which is subject to this part may not impose any sanction on any person, including a student organization, in response to a covered allegation unless the sanction is imposed under a formal hearing or similar adjudicatory proceeding, in accordance with institutional disciplinary proceedings that meet each of the following requirements: (1) The institution sh…
/r/MensRights19/04/16 04:36 PM
1

SEC. 163. ROLE OF LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES IN INVESTIGATION OF ALLEGATIONS OF SEXUAL VIOLENCE. (a) Referral of Allegations.-- (1) Referral.--Except as provided in paragraph (2), if an institution of higher education which is subject to this part receives a covered allegation, along with written consent to proceed from the alleged victim, the institution shall report and refer the allegation to the law enforcement agency of the unit of local government with jurisdiction to respond to such allegat…
/r/MensRights19/04/16 04:35 PM

Contents of the bill- Going to be editing it for formatting for a bit. Bolded- important parts. the TLDR: if any student reports a rape to a school the school must do the following: Report the rape to the police in lieu of the student within 48 hours The student may opt out of this, however this bars the school from taking ANY punitive or retributive actions against the accused, and the accused is still protected from the acuser from smearing them. Not Bar or suspend the student for more than 15…
/r/MensRights19/04/16 04:35 PM
1

i would be interested in the actual protocols its trying to establish- a lot can be lost in translation or via word of mouth.
/r/MensRights19/04/16 03:50 PM
3

im curious- do you have a link for this? it would be an interesting read. Personally i err on the side of agreement with the presented action plan. you should without a doubt report rape to the police regardless of any of the excuses you listed above. I am all for believing a person to be innocent until proven guilty, but if you were truly raped, and you don''t go and do everything in your power to stop them from doing it again, then it will happen again to someone else, and you did nothing to s…
/r/MensRights19/04/16 03:41 PM
1

For future reference You need to replace your link with this: https://np.reddit.com/r/TwoXChromosomes/comments/4fe10y/i_just_need_to_share_my_tiny_bit_of_good_news/ once you edit your post to reflect that i'll go ahead and unlock it. While this is a dubious circumstance- nothing shes said points to a false claim. Its common sense that Alcohol is not license to sex. The likely point of contention in this topic is that everything hinges on if she said yes or no to the encounter, and that boils dow…
/r/MensRights19/04/16 03:01 PM
1

god the feels from that.... its glorious.
/r/MensRights15/04/16 08:26 PM
1

Ignoring reports on this unless someone can source a reason why his post is not relevant to the MRM
/r/MensRights14/04/16 03:51 PM
1

which is it >_>
/r/MensRights11/04/16 08:36 PM
1

thats a statement i can get behind.
/r/MensRights11/04/16 08:29 PM
0

so you think that they just paid away their rape vs actually being innocent?
/r/MensRights11/04/16 08:28 PM
11

theres no need, the statistical data is already there. most states have a "default to the mother" law, in which the mother recieves custody unless she is A felon A known drug addict Has a recorded history of child abuse Has a recorded Drug Dealing charge. unless any of those are true, 99% of the time the mother gets custody unless they opt out.
/r/MensRights11/04/16 07:18 PM
3

your statement implies they won because they were rich, and not because they were innocent.
/r/MensRights11/04/16 07:13 PM
2

retributive justice. the police messed up, so they at least want to nail one of them to the wall.
/r/MensRights11/04/16 07:11 PM
10

what you should be asking is "why is he being charged for videotaping the act, which functioned as exculpatory evidence for him and his friends?" Answer is : the police dun goof'd, and they are out for blood as a result.
/r/MensRights11/04/16 07:09 PM
1

nope and nope- a dogs Knotting and a cats barbs both are to ensure coupling until the act is completed - they have no hands, and small genitals. Again- its a trait due to the fact that mating ensures impregnation in these animals, regardless of partners, and in humans it does not.
/r/MensRights11/04/16 04:49 PM
3

Slut came from an old english word that was generally used for "unclean" women, as in STD ridden women. it was common belief back then that Women were responsible for the spread of STD's, and it wasn't understood that males were also carriers and transmitters as well. later the word was attached to promiscuous women and prostitutes, which was to serve as a warning to people that the risk of STD's are high. Flash forward to modern day society, and the term has stuck to promiscuous women, and pros…
/r/MensRights11/04/16 04:12 PM
6

am i the only one who noticed shes white?
/r/MensRights08/04/16 07:43 PM
1

still waiting for bob barker to come out of nowhere and go "and the price of Coke501 is......."
/r/MensRights08/04/16 01:35 PM
1

sorry, but those are only available to CIS White males.
/r/MensRights08/04/16 01:32 PM
2

you pricey bastard.
/r/MensRights08/04/16 01:27 PM
1

i figured as much, but you gotta have fun where you can have fun :)
/r/MensRights08/04/16 01:26 PM
3

From the PSA on the massive influx of troll posts We are removing these posts with prejudice, and banning the users responsible. So yes, we are removing and banning indiscriminately. if your account fits the profile, we review the content and either approve it, or remove it and issue a ban; alternatively we allow the auto mod bot to auto remove questionable topics and posts. using the phrase "i mansplained to her how", along with the rampant misspellings "as a gay man i fisted off over 20 women"…
/r/MensRights08/04/16 01:18 PM
2

im more concerned with a gay man having "fisted off" twenty females.
/r/MensRights08/04/16 01:13 PM
-1

Shut up. Don't admit anything, don't deny anything. he wouldnt want to deny the sex, simply by merit that there are two witnesses that saw the before and after, and lying about it puts him in a bad spot.
/r/MensRights07/04/16 08:13 PM
-6

just a heads up; we are not a Legal forum. dont take any advice here as legitimate legal advice. my personal advice to you is: Do nothing until you are accused. on your questions Am I required to tell anything to the school? Telling my side of the story would also reveal that I consumed illicit substances, but I am concerned that refusing to talk would implicate me. No and you shouldnt offer that drug related information unless specifically questioned about it by a police officer. That being sai…
/r/MensRights07/04/16 08:00 PM
1

oh i thought you were talking about the wiki archive bot; idk about any other bots.
/r/MensRights07/04/16 01:03 PM
1

never made one since people never used the archive it call out. Wouldn't take me too long to code one if we ever decided to try it out.
/r/MensRights07/04/16 12:57 PM
1

Dead Link
/r/MensRights07/04/16 12:50 PM
4

I FOUND IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIITTTTTTTTTTTTT Science, Its a girl Thing! its so stupid, it got taken down for being so stupid.
/r/MensRights07/04/16 01:23 AM
2

fact of it is that graduation statistics show something like a 32% of male graduates go into stem, while less than 5% females go into STEM- and the vast majority of the females go into teaching instead of an actual STEM Field. so its litterally an issue of men outnumbering women 100-1.
/r/MensRights07/04/16 01:04 AM
1

well. you can always just i don't know. not be sexist at all and simply have certain requirements based on ability. it is pretty simple concept. its not sexist. it is quite literally science. or are you suggesting that science is sexist? are you familiar with the term dimorphisim? humans are a dimorphic species. we are distinctly different from the other gender. there is a lot more to do with sports than simply grip or strength also. no duh? thats why i specified strength and endurance as well. …
/r/MensRights07/04/16 12:58 AM
1

nah dead serious. the admins are usually pretty helpful, but reddits internal policies are.... ok... at best.
/r/MensRights07/04/16 12:31 AM
2

they took it down, it was horrible, so very horrible. if i can find a mirror anywhere i'll let you know.
/r/MensRights07/04/16 12:30 AM
7

TRIGGERING INTENSIFIES
/r/MensRights06/04/16 07:58 PM
25

Dear official who approved this grant: You, Sir or Madam, are a retard. who in gods name gave the okay on this? why would you put someone who cant be objective on the study in charge of it? shes a self proclaimed feminist as well as a "Gender & Feminist Psychology" professor. what kills me is this professor. shes also one of the masterminds behind that absolutely retarded "girls can do science and be cute too" promotional video to try enticing girls into STEM, which was hilariously taken down by…
/r/MensRights06/04/16 05:25 PM
2

oh because the average female body weight pre-Fatsplosion in america is 140, and remains 140 if you discount the morbidly obese. the average athlete is 100-180 depending on height and sport - swimmers and gymnasts are in the 100-120 range, while basketball/soccer are in the 120-140, and other sports like weight lifting are in the 140-180. i am a 30year old male and most normal women can beat the fucking shit out of me I fail to see how sex has anything to do with anything. This would put you at …
/r/MensRights06/04/16 01:54 PM
3

oh that's kind of neat. i had no idea this company existed. I'm pretty up on science and medicine, but know little about this works. potentially TMI - read at your own risk: its nice to know that this is out there as a potential future remedy for this.
/r/MensRights06/04/16 01:42 PM
1

affirmative action will always have cause to exist any time there is a disparate number of employment of a specific group. we aren't in total equality lala land, and likely never will be for the foreseeable future. the "total equality" you speak of is a fairy tale.
/r/MensRights06/04/16 01:30 PM
1

Only if you play into that narrative. The other version is that everyone going into a sport knows it's a physical sport... and that the potential for injury is there... so the teams have players sign contracts waving the team of responsibility for any injuries they sustain (man or woman). so the thing with the football helmets isnt happening right now then? those waivers can be signed, but that doesnt stop the players from trying to change rules and regulations. As for trying to force a gender q…
/r/MensRights06/04/16 12:59 PM
2

nah the admins were cool about it. they perma banned them from reddit.
/r/MensRights06/04/16 12:52 PM
1

dont get me wrong- thats not the parallel to draw here- Men will have a far wider variance in who can get in simpy by the merit of female athletes being at their absloute best, are only going to be on par with a bottom to mid rung male pro athlete physically- with some extreme outliers being in the upper echelon. this effectively shoehorns 99% of the "professional athelete tier" of women from ever even having a shot at placing on a team. its why female divisions have to be kept separate from men…
/r/MensRights06/04/16 03:21 AM
1

so knowing this, you would still champion desegregation of sports? knowing that will give them full liscense to start an affirmitive action campaign to force a gender quota cap? then when female athletes start getting injured en masse, the officials have to dictate a rule change that protects them from getting hurt. now you have a sport where hitting a woman too hard will result in a penalty. youll be watching twohand touch football or flag football instead. do you really want that? do you see t…
/r/MensRights05/04/16 08:26 PM
1

Equality does not mean that everyone (man or woman) will be represented in every field/ job/ role. It means that everyone will be measured using the same criteria, and the BEST person for the job will get it. Yet here we are in massively pro affirmative action america.
/r/MensRights05/04/16 08:11 PM
-5

hey "buddy", i DIDN'T miss the point. De-segregating sports would only serve to eliminate 99% of the current female professional athletes employment. if you want women in sports, the only way to ensure their proliferation is through segregation, or through gender quota caps / affirmative action, One ensures the survival of the sport, the other destroys it forever. "Why not desegregate sports?" Should be asked to any womens soccer pay gap hypocrites. Try it, see what subjects they change the conv…
/r/MensRights05/04/16 07:31 PM
0

it boils down to "Either you have a .0000001% chance of getting on a team, or you have a 10% chance of getting onto a team". without female dedicated sports, we would have virtually no professional female athletes. then we have crys for equal employment, then we have gender quota caps per team and affirmative action. Gender segregation in contact sports is required.
/r/MensRights05/04/16 07:28 PM
5

we dont de-segregate sports for a multitude of reasons Men have natural instincts to NOT harm women. in contact sports, this will cause men to hesitate or not play as hard. Societal backlash. if a 350 football player creams a male 190 Quarterback its no problem. if he creams a 160 pound female quarterback, and destroys her, people would call for his head. Men are vastly superior to women in size, strength and endurance values at comparative levels. E.G. An average male will outperform any averag…
/r/MensRights05/04/16 07:05 PM
1

No one, MRA or not, specifically enjoys a woman being unilaterally beaten, and those that do are sociopaths. Anyone lauding it, encouraging it, or promoting it will be dealt with. what you've sourced is a point of gender equality that most people fail to recognize. Whoppi goldberg said this best: you cannot raise your hands to a person, a man or woman, and not expect them to do the same to you. The message is "Don't hit anybody". its not that this user is lauding the assault of a woman, hes laud…
/r/MensRights05/04/16 02:35 PM
3

if they used the faster serving balls in mens tennis, i doubt it would make for an interesting match.
/r/MensRights05/04/16 01:22 PM
1

/r/Feminisim is confirmed to be one such site.
/r/MensRights04/04/16 08:44 PM
6

i gave them the list of names for the spammers, hopefully they do something with it.
/r/MensRights04/04/16 05:59 PM
4

the dovahkin shall not be questioned. there are no witnesses. all were slain.
/r/MensRights04/04/16 05:39 PM
2

you are thinking of the campus rape hoax. the under-reporting figure was created through the same methodology that /u/gv18 described. the problem with this statistic is again that its unverifiable- did they really get raped or was that just their version of events- or did it even happen at all? there was no way to validate the claimants, so for examples sake, they would have had 20 Reported rapes in an area, and 80 other people who came forward to claim it happened to them but wasn't reported. t…
/r/MensRights04/04/16 05:35 PM
2

you didn't dispose of the used condom yourself. Seriously- walk it over to the toilet and flush it, or rinse it out before tossing it.
/r/MensRights04/04/16 05:25 PM
7

yea... lol thats pretty much what it is.
/r/MensRights04/04/16 04:18 PM
6

im not seeing where you found out shes pregnant? am i just blind?
/r/MensRights04/04/16 04:10 PM
2

while we cant offer legal advice here, as we arent lawyers (at least some of us are not), we do understand your plight- its the very thing the MRM is trying to end. Please let us know how your situation turns out. If any of our users offer advice, do not take it as 100% accurate legal advice- its too easy to misinterperet something and wind up hurting yourself in the end. On a personal note: i recommend reaching out to an attorney. the fact that you are being forced to pay child support to a soo…
/r/MensRights04/04/16 04:02 PM
19

its best you dont ;_; Feeding trolls can only hurt us. i'm building a list that we can take to the reddit admins so they can figure out if these come from the same IP or multiple IP's and then ban the linked accounts for brigading.
/r/MensRights04/04/16 03:03 PM
3

wow. he does an amazing job of stating his case. this is well worth the watch for anyone.
/r/MensRights04/04/16 01:58 PM
1

The best study done on this topic was the Lisak paper on repeat rapes , and the Lisak paper on false allegations - however it was done from a pro-feminisim standpoint, and completely plays down the false report statistic through conflation. The lisak paper looks at about 100+ Rape cases, and analyzes them based on outcomes.
/r/MensRights04/04/16 01:51 PM
1

there is no clear correlation between the linked article and mens rights here. this is more of a "stupid women" type post. Going to be removing it for not being in-line with the sub rules See the below rules for specifics. Off-Topic: Off-topic submissions are those that have nothing to do with Men's Rights. Generally the poster will be notified and the post removed. Off-topic posts that hit the spam-filter may be left there without notice. Note that in general posts about /r/ShitRedditSays and r…
/r/MensRights04/04/16 01:48 PM
2

no its being deleted because its clearly a troll post chumming the waters for SJW ammunition.
/r/MensRights04/04/16 01:42 PM
1

very well written article. its maintains its cohesion through staying on point, its Comprehensive, and its accurate.
/r/MensRights04/04/16 01:39 PM
2

to my knowledge there are no aggregate databases of Proven innocent or guilty men (tho the Sex offenders registry will have the guilty ones) - that being said, we have a wiki that can be used, or we can set up a legitimate database that we can use for reports and statistical data. would take a metric tonne of work to get going, but once built could be an invaluable resource.
/r/MensRights04/04/16 01:18 PM
1

no, you were banned because you are putting up all the indications of being a troll. New account Post rife with spelling errors Posting in a way that is designed to get men to go 'stupid women' or talk badly about women as a whole. We have a troll spamming posts fishing for bait to use on SJW sites, and we are in a zero tollerance mode. See the sidebar rules: Young accounts are given no tolerance. No posts about bannings by other moderators (too common, not relevant to topic of "rights")
/r/MensRights04/04/16 01:15 PM
5

she apparently thought it was ok to moonlight as a camgirl for what is probably the most wholesome and child friendly gaming company on the planet.
/r/MensRights04/04/16 12:55 PM
6

i wasnt a virgin by that time and had fully come into the wonderful world of sex,i was honestly taking just as much advantage of her as she was me, simply by the fact that she didnt threaten me into bed, and i was kind of just stoked to be getting it on with my math teacher who looked way too good to be a teacher. so no i didnt- wasnt the right thing to do, but i wasnt as wise to the world then as i am now.
/r/MensRights02/04/16 05:09 AM
2

while the theme of what she was doing was sexual, technically sitting on a childs lap isnt a crime. had she tried to fondle him or something, then it would be different.
/r/MensRights02/04/16 05:05 AM
1

pretty much what he said. there is some moral bearing, but no more than the same moral bearing that spawned the reddit rules.
/r/MensRights02/04/16 05:03 AM
2

I've been around for a few months now, but never in any official mod capacity. I was laying some groundwork for the wiki for improvements, but they bumped me up to a full mod the other day.
/r/MensRights01/04/16 10:23 PM
5

its not that any one side is being allowed. there are posts that ive had to remove of the context of "nah thats what black people do its ok", and "nah just black people being black." or applauding the fact that the mother exposed their child to something they are FAR to young for. both things go against both the sub rules.
/r/MensRights01/04/16 10:15 PM
2

its not that children are maturing any earlier than they always have. there is a reason people got married at 14 back in the day, and thats because at 14 you are largely biologically developed with very little left to grow.
/r/MensRights01/04/16 08:31 PM
1

actually in america 9th grade is highschool in most places. Elementary is K-5, Middle is 6-8, and High is 9-12. it used to be Elementary was K-5, Mid was 6-9, and high was 10-12.
/r/MensRights01/04/16 08:30 PM
18

its likely a common phenomenon. it happened to me when i was 17, and happened to a few personal friends. i think that its a far more common occurrence than society would admit, but i'm operating on a anecdotal/confirmation bias here.
/r/MensRights01/04/16 08:28 PM
3

god if i have to hear about tracers butt one more time i will just flood all of reddit with the /r/rule34 overwatch archives.
/r/MensRights01/04/16 08:23 PM
2

Why is there a MRM and a Men's Rights sub? most certianly for raising awareness of things like female on male violence. there is a clear distinction to be made between an aggressor and a baited aggressor. Much like if a cop takes you out for no reason other than being a male versus a cop taking you out once you start throwing doughnuts at that cop. A) She seems very happy to hit him. Obviously they are at a social setting. from the onset of this shes smiling and happy- probably a bit intoxicated…
/r/MensRights01/04/16 07:55 PM
2

This isnt a Mens rights issue. Violence against men by women and men is a MRM issue however this isnt some abusive woman trying to hurt him - He baits her into hitting him; literally says here hit me in the face. you can see that she thinks its a game and goes along, and then sucker punches her to try and teach her a lesson.
/r/MensRights01/04/16 07:39 PM
13

society considers us to be sex-ravenous fiends incapable of control. sexualizing a minor like this through acts like hiring a stripper, having your friend screw the gay out of him, or taking him to a strip club at 10 (all of these are examples of past things done to young boys), are all parts of society enforcing this notion, and even more disgustingly has the exact effect of potentially turning this child into that very thing
/r/MensRights01/04/16 07:28 PM

just to put this out there. Posts Lauding, or approving this act will be removed- its dangerously close to sexualizing minors- one of Reddit's biggest don't rules. also anything "its ok cuz they're black" type posts.
/r/MensRights01/04/16 07:26 PM
3

W R E K T.
/r/MensRights01/04/16 06:14 PM
2

i live in the third largest hotspot of African American density in america. i understand what you are alluding to, but not even that culture endorses this for children.
/r/MensRights01/04/16 05:52 PM
2

Validity as a MR Issue? Roe V wade addressed the current issues of abortion, and made it legal nationwide- albeit not as well as it could have, however we are still in the infancy of fleshing it out. This is distinctly a Womans rights issue, while not unimportant, this is not the proper venue for discussing it. can you clue me into how this ties back to being a MR Issue?
/r/MensRights01/04/16 05:50 PM
2

First- I'm doing you the courtesy of explaining to you why the other mods are killing your posts. Reel it in a bit. Second- you are trying to say that the REPUBLICAN BACKED free market concept is being pushed by feminism. Republican principals are against virtually everything Feminist. The two are not interconnected. you claim that they are, but you have failed repeatedly to produce something that supports the claim that they are. Third - We aren't here to censor anyone, but your points do not h…
/r/MensRights01/04/16 05:40 PM
1

Spam/Off-Topic posts will be removed. Use self-posts for related topics, justifying their relation. I'm not the mod who is removing your posts, but i want you to have a good reason as to why: your posts are trying to tie a liberal agenda to a MRM issue, and the link you are drawing between the two is about as fragile as a strand of silk, and you are spamming them at an unprecedented rate. we have users who are clicking the "report" button on many of your posts flagging them as spam, and i am inc…
/r/MensRights01/04/16 05:24 PM
5

in what culture is this an acceptable birthday gift for an 8 year old? look i get it if your aprilfools trolling, but seriously /s it.. .
/r/MensRights01/04/16 04:56 PM
4

i didnt know lapdances were a part of american culture for children :/
/r/MensRights01/04/16 04:50 PM
2

i dont see where this article makes the connection that feminism is at fault. what i'm getting from your post is that you are against the free market under the pretext that it hurts men.... i don't think thats a parallel that you can draw, simply because in first world countries, the free market is controlled by the government in terms of labor, wage, and risk.
/r/MensRights01/04/16 04:30 PM
2

i dont see a relation to mens rights; can you clarifiy how you are relating this?
/r/MensRights01/04/16 04:25 PM
27

ok thats kind of Vomit-worthy.
/r/MensRights01/04/16 04:12 PM
2

Masterfully done you glorious bastard. This set my murder boner to maximum when i saw it. Now the feminists will never leave us alone.
/r/MensRights01/04/16 04:10 PM
6

i hold a local youth group in VA in coordination with the local Elementary school to offer advanced development styled courses to disadvantaged minority teens. its not gender specific, but i have only had one girl ever attend. you can start one up yourself if you decide you want to. you can approach the local school systems with your credentials, and offer to teach supplementary courses after school once or twice a week. depending on the school they'll allow it or allow it supervised. most schoo…
/r/MensRights01/04/16 03:03 PM
2

usually dress, demeanor, punctuality are all tells of a man who makes a significant income. Even as a man these are the things i'll look at when sizing up another man: Dress is his shirt tucked? Are his shoes good quality and in good repair Is he wearing a belt, and is it centered is his facial hair well kempt are his clothes unstained and wrinkle free Demeanor Is he polite is he confident is he in control Punctuality Did he arrive on time? usually if you can run down this list with all yeses, t…
/r/MensRights01/04/16 12:49 PM
2

/u/gaysayno confirmed trollposter
/r/MensRights31/03/16 08:24 PM
1

/u/Torapeornottorape confirmed trollposter
/r/MensRights31/03/16 07:47 PM
1

/u/trump4prezydent identified trollposter.
/r/MensRights31/03/16 07:44 PM
1

/u/itakeblame identified trollposter
/r/MensRights31/03/16 07:44 PM
3

unless you have the most proactive affirmative action HR department, i am exceedingly dubious of your story. i have been a Developer, and worked consulting for the majority of my life, and i can count on one hand the number of times i've come across a dev team that was more than 10% female - and not for any merit other than the female dev density is only at 10% nation wide, and even lower at code monkey level. on the other hand, i can see where some truth would shine in on your story if the numb…
/r/MensRights31/03/16 07:41 PM
1

/u/leavemenalone identified trollposter
/r/MensRights31/03/16 07:31 PM
1

/u/genderbendery identified trollposter
/r/MensRights31/03/16 07:30 PM
1

/u/imagirlnoaboy identified trollposter
/r/MensRights31/03/16 07:28 PM
1

/u/imagirlnoaboy identified trollposter
/r/MensRights31/03/16 07:27 PM
1

/u/Dielyingirl identified troll account
/r/MensRights31/03/16 07:26 PM
1

i Don't know that fat bottomed girls necessarily glorifies it even. the studies on boys who have sex with an older woman show that they tend to have little to no respect for them, or have deep seated resentment against them. it could be that this happened to the person who wrote it, and this is their way of lashing out
/r/MensRights31/03/16 07:20 PM
1

/u/imagirlnoaboy identified trollposter
/r/MensRights31/03/16 07:17 PM
1

/u/Rapeisrare identified trollposter
/r/MensRights31/03/16 07:15 PM
1

/u/Ee9421 identified troll poster
/r/MensRights31/03/16 07:14 PM
1

im not seeing it- ive listend to the song before, but there was never any deviant undertone i could pick up on.
/r/MensRights31/03/16 07:11 PM
4

probably best if you dont. they're fishing for ammo to use. theres been some people in the stop sub hate sub looking for reasons to have us labeled as a hate sub, and with the extremely feminist leaning admin team reddit has, it wont take much.
/r/MensRights31/03/16 07:09 PM
3

/u/mengiverights identified troll poster Despite Knowing you are a troll- VAWA prevents what you've claimed from being true.
/r/MensRights31/03/16 07:07 PM
2

/u/Mengiverights Identified troll
/r/MensRights31/03/16 07:05 PM
10

i... his post isnt wrong.. and i dont know what to do with this information. for men only two things really ever matter to us for the most part and thats appearance and body weight..... i cant think of the last time i dumped a girl because shes a scrub.
/r/MensRights31/03/16 07:04 PM
1

/u/modellooks identified troll
/r/MensRights31/03/16 06:58 PM
4

id be banning if i could ;_; i think most mods other than ann arent active at these times
/r/MensRights31/03/16 06:45 PM
0

well... technically all you need is a hairtie and a good vaccuum action and any unconscious male, roofied, sleeping or otherwise is good to go >_>
/r/MensRights31/03/16 06:42 PM
5

no thats most certainly the narrative told here. a young boy presumably under age, has sex with the older woman. hes saying that experience forever tainted him, and he loves fattbottmed girls now.
/r/MensRights31/03/16 06:31 PM
1

What you just described is not rape. men aren't mind readers. saying no in your head is like Bambi farting in the woods- nobody's going to know its happening. the second you verbally said "yes" you gave him liscense to sex. if you dont tell him no, or to stop, that license doesn't end because you feel uncomfortable but say nothing about it. it can only end when you VERBALLY tell him otherwise. we aren't sages of body language. want to know something? the EXTREME majority of young women 20-30 are…
/r/MensRights31/03/16 06:17 PM
5

it was an example in which a falsehood becomes an apocryphal claim.
/r/MensRights31/03/16 04:46 PM
1

but they dont have boobs! theyre only half of the equation we need!
/r/MensRights31/03/16 04:09 PM
3

see i think that's where you are wrong. the exceedingly vast majority of men strive to protect women, even complete strangers. if you were raped- its not that men aren't protecting you, its that you either exposed yourself to a sociopath or were a random victim of a sociopath. Please don't blame men, we aren't rapists. there are bad people in this world, men and women alike. you cant expect anyone to protect you unless they make that promise to you.
/r/MensRights31/03/16 04:04 PM
1

virtually nothing, and nobody wants to be associated with an accused rapist.
/r/MensRights31/03/16 03:51 PM
1

technically sweden is UTC+2, so yes, it comes two hours before anyone west of them.
/r/MensRights31/03/16 03:50 PM
1

sadly most attorneys wont represent you with a ten foot pole in this situation.
/r/MensRights31/03/16 03:46 PM
4

you would think that would be the logical outcome- however i ask you kindly direct your gaze at the current "wage gap" debacle in america. similar apocryphal claims have gotten so influential and believable that our own president has fallen prey to them. we've already proven that the ".77/1" claim is a complete false claim, yet people still treat it as factual. the people in charge of cutting their checks will undoubtedly acquiesce and give them a raise simply due to the immense pressure of not …
/r/MensRights31/03/16 03:37 PM
10

so theres a method of writing that obscures the truth using facts. saying that the womens team made 20 million dollars more revenue last year than the mens team, does not mean that they made the mens team + 20 million dollars. it means that they simply increased their revenue by 20 million dollars more than the mens team increased their revenue last year. E.G. Womens team bought in 20,000,000 in 2014 Mens team bought in 500,000,000 in 2014 Womens team bought in 44,000,000 in 2015 mens team bough…
/r/MensRights31/03/16 03:25 PM
0

beat him into a coma actually.
/r/MensRights31/03/16 02:28 AM
1

i dont think i am..... your question is under the pretext of some expected reverence, and i dont think thats whats in store unless we have some pretty massive image overhauls of the MRM, and we get rid of the "fuck women" mentality that runs rampant here.
/r/MensRights30/03/16 08:07 PM
5

probably wont be to be honest. the world finds us repugnant. (and unfortunately for good reason in some cases - some MRAs act like were a male version of feminism)
/r/MensRights30/03/16 07:42 PM
2

Supermans powers are the most inconsistent thing in the DC universe. Superman is so ungodly powerful that NOTHING is stronger than him. superman could atomize the planet with a damn pinky flick. the problem however with superman is that each writer is given creative license on just how strong they want to make him. they portray him as struggling at times to add drama and draw. nothing more. If you want to see a pretty damn accurate telling of how retarded superman is, Screwattack does a good one…
/r/MensRights30/03/16 06:45 PM
5

its honestly up in the air... i see feminisim gaining ground far faster than the MRM, simply because of their cult practices, and our passivity. we may see a world in 200 years similar to the one shown in star trek the next generation where they come across a Matriarchal society where men are servants to women and completely subservient and passive.
/r/MensRights30/03/16 06:40 PM
2

now i aint saying shes a gold digger.... but she aint messing with no broke......
/r/MensRights30/03/16 06:28 PM
1

Under SCAR’s preferred model, she would only be entitled to alimony for 15 years. So at age 63, she’d be summarily robbed of the money that supported her for the vast majority of her adult life. Thrust back into the workforce at an age where most employees are winding down their careers, and where many employers mask age discrimination in a long laundry list of pretextual reasons for not hiring, our hypothetical woman would find it nearly impossible to find another means of supporting herself. o…
/r/MensRights30/03/16 06:25 PM
2

the whole thing was caught on camera. she did that stupid shit where a person gets in another persons face, and he puts his arm up to keep her from getting closer. no groping happened.
/r/MensRights30/03/16 03:22 PM
1

yep, all he does is touch her with a piece of paper. no groping at all.
/r/MensRights30/03/16 02:09 PM
1

shes pretty chill for having just gotten maced.
/r/MensRights30/03/16 02:07 PM
1

actually they did, and they got shot anyways in every continuity. in the Flashpoint Arc where barry visits an alternate reality where martha and thomas did struggle, and bruce was killed as a result, and she becomes the joker, and thomas becomes batman. personally i liked the book tim burton based his movie off of where the joker before he became the joker killed batmans parents. i felt like that version paints a much darker much more intamate relationship between batman and the joker- i also be…
/r/MensRights30/03/16 01:08 PM
2

that and most public seating is built these days to accomodate women. ever notice that if you sit down with your feet & Knees together, the backs of your legs are off of the chair by about 2-3 inches? its because the average male height is about 5'11, but the chairs are built to seat people 5'5
/r/MensRights30/03/16 12:51 PM
2

seriously not even an understatement. hes one of humanity's great hopes, and he looks like a super-villain.
/r/MensRights29/03/16 09:00 PM
1

last i checked, i had a shadow banned account a few months ago.
/r/MensRights29/03/16 07:17 PM
8

heaven forbid i dont want to sit on my testicles, or reach down to hoist them onto my lap. heaven forbid i sit in an anatomically COMFORTABLE position.
/r/MensRights29/03/16 07:16 PM
1

i think he was being facetious.
/r/MensRights29/03/16 07:08 PM
0

more like .01% of the worlds population can throw a proper punch. men used to teach their sons how to fight, because there is no surer way to defend what is yours or dear to you than by the flesh, sweat, and blood of your body. not so much anymore. its something we lost with the baby boomers and hippies. hopefully it makes a resurgence in our society - i for one will make sure my sons and daughters know how to defend themselves.
/r/MensRights29/03/16 06:53 PM
3

do you know WHY people compare anarchy to chaos? because they go hand in hand. there has never been a recorded bout of anarchy in history that has not either come as a result of a war, or a precursor to a war, or a governmental collapse, which will incontrovertibly result in chaos. Were done here. This isn't the sub for discussing this, and regardless, convincing you that anarchy is an apocryphal fools ideology and is not some magical fairy come to fix all of your problems, is not going to happe…
/r/MensRights29/03/16 06:49 PM
3

are you delusional? i mean seriously? those things didn't happen because of the governments. those things happened because their governments lack the power to enforce their rules RESULTING IN ANARCHY.
/r/MensRights29/03/16 06:37 PM
3

go spend some time in the middle east, or in myanmar. let me know how you like what you see there. i didn't like it when it was there. All of those examples are things I've seen, or were widely reported on. That last one was particularly nice when a couple of guys went into an afghan domicile, raped his wife, daughters and son in front of him, and then killed them infront of him, shot him in the chest and left him for dead, and went and ditched their rifles in the nearby river.
/r/MensRights29/03/16 06:33 PM
2

and your such an epic bad ass that you could defend yourself from anything and everything right? even seasoned psychopaths or far more trained people than you right? I've spotted the uninformed idiot guys who's never read up on Anarchism beyond the first page of google. Actually i've been in places with ACTUAL anarchy, where men and women are just gunned down for shits and giggles, or children are raped in broad daylight, where someone can just waltz into your home, rape and murder your entire f…
/r/MensRights29/03/16 06:18 PM
3

sorry but anyone who says "im an anarchist" has no idea what anarchy is, and has never been anywhere where actual anarchy is happening. in a place with ACTUAL anarchy, i could gouge out your eyes and use your ocular cavities as a bowl for my steaming hot cheddar broccoli bisque while you are flailing around in pain screaming "please stop, dear god please stop, all i can see is cheesy pain", and i would face NO repercussions for my actions. i could then squirrel you away in my basement and keep y…
/r/MensRights29/03/16 06:14 PM
3

Anarchist whoops, spotted the edgelord guys.
/r/MensRights29/03/16 05:57 PM
1

idk that you can call musk beta.... he put fuckers in space. thats a pretty alpha achievement.
/r/TheRedPill29/03/16 02:50 PM
5

ahh, sorry if you though my posts intention was to diminish the fact that shes an abuser. theres no doubt about that fact. She is an abuser. Abuse however is not a personality trait. Abuse is a symptom of a deficient personality trait or personality defect- its often used as a coping mechanism. Abusers will seek out substance or violence in order to cope with these defects, and as such, many times the real reason behind the abuse is obscured because people looking from the outside in tend to onl…
/r/MensRights28/03/16 08:35 PM
1

idk if you missed this part. (not to say that shes not being abusive both mentally and physically, more that this can be attributed as stemming from insecurities on her part). im not saying shes NOT abusing him. im saying her abuse stems from insecurities. "why are you looking at other women, am i not good enough" is textbook insecurity.
/r/MensRights28/03/16 08:22 PM
1

i think lacrosse is technically the male version of field hockey.
/r/MensRights28/03/16 08:15 PM
-2

no thats what insecurity looks like. (not to say that shes not being abusive both mentally and physically, more that this can be attributed as stemming from insecurities on her part). the reason you dont see this shit with men, is men are taught from a very young age that: nobody gives two shits about your insecurities. your insecurities are your problem. dont bother other people with your insecurities. i generally avoid anything that blames women, or generalizes women by saying "all women have …
/r/MensRights28/03/16 07:55 PM
5

nope, and there wont be. in america, you are responsible for \ your children your bastards children born out of wedlock Adulterous children Adulterous Bastard children. you are 100% responsible for a woman and her actions, regardless of if she cheated on you or not. there have been cases of statutorily raped boys who are being forced to pay child support to their rapists.
/r/MensRights28/03/16 07:08 PM
4

i believe it was stalin who specifically cited Feminisim as the foundation on which socialisim can be laid. This was because for socialisim to effectually make ground, they must disrupt the family, which would in turn disupt the government. He posited that nothing was more effective at non-violently doing this than the second wave feminisim movement in america. See new soviet man. he then set forth in Russia pushing progressive ideals such as female equality and the like to "break down" his peop…
/r/MensRights28/03/16 05:58 PM
1

yep, and god no. its completely unacceptabble; knowing that however doesnt change the fact of thats how it is, and untill the idea of marrige goes away, or at least they start letting people who arent married, but together have the same tax breakage and benefits, thats the way it will stay. our legal system is SORELY behind in virtually every facet- technology, drugs, marrige etc. just because i know this doesnt mean i get to go arround pirating everything, smokin weed erry day, and divorcing a …
/r/MensRights26/03/16 06:08 PM
-1

ANY judge will throw out a one sided prenuptial. practically every case you listed contained an agreement that was ridiculously one sided. if your prenup is not giving her a substantial claim to your wealth, it can and will most certainly be thrown out, and she will get ALL of your shit. Give her 25-30% of your assets and no judge is going to throw that out. if you do what most of these cases above did, and give her 0-.01% of your assets, a judge is going to take half or more of your shit and gi…
/r/MensRights26/03/16 05:58 PM
5

that number came from FDA surveys and then chopped a percentage off the top (about 20%, IIRC). yea you dont recall correctly. other countries performed the same tests and came to the same results. the exception being the UK gaging at 1800 for an average adult male, but thats understandable given their average national height is lower than america. No, it's you jerking off - verbally masturbating to the idea that you're better than them and they're such a huge problem and look who contemptible th…
/r/MensRights26/03/16 12:00 AM
4

do you know HOW we know just how much a human body burns on average? i'll give you a hint- its through a natural reaction that maintains your body temperature. we know exactly how much a person burns because of their body temperature. its what governs our magical ability to keep that uniform 98.7 temperature across the entirety of our species. Do you know WHY we store fat? its because we intake MORE than our body needs to maintain that level- Ergo if you know a persons target body weight, the ef…
/r/MensRights25/03/16 11:31 PM
0

I would argue that stress, and ego-depletion are two of the biggest factors. by that logic, the people in africa, and other parts of the world would be in the same perdicament- so thats out. And if you want to argue food scarcity as the factor for africa- Hello all of asia where food is abundant and the people are still skinny! It doesn't make sense to say that a bunch of people just up and went 'amoral' and became lazy slobs all of a sudden. when the issue is predominately apparent in a single …
/r/MensRights25/03/16 11:05 PM
12

NOW is rampantly active in florida.
/r/MensRights25/03/16 10:53 PM
1

hahahahaah oh god thats adorable... holy jeez... do you not know how a calorie is gauged? please keep telling yourself that. ill be over here with everyone else who knows whats up and i'll keep being the guy who lost fifty pounds by doing just what i described above. eat proper portions. caloric valuie is a proper gauge of your portioning. put yourself in a caloric deficit, and dont break it. work out at a vigorous rate for 1% of your day- 20 minutes, and you will drop weight. P E R I O D.
/r/MensRights25/03/16 10:52 PM
3

no my point is not unscientific at all. its basic math. your body cant just spontaneously generate mass. people fail at diets because they fail at self discipline, or completely underestimate just how many calories are in that burger with two patties four slices of mostly fat chese, and eight strips of bacon. i will LITTERALLY BUY (as in purchase them as a person) anyone who has a strict 1500 calories a day intake, at least 20 minutes of rigorous exercise, and still gains weight because i can fi…
/r/MensRights25/03/16 09:57 PM
32

find a sane woman. they do exist. Dont live in florida dont live in states that legally encourage hypergamy get married before your child is born. have some form of pre-marital contract drafted. dont let her tell me "you dont love me if you want me to sign this"- she should understand that no judge will allow a one sided prenup- its for protecting you both. Enjoy your life.
/r/MensRights25/03/16 08:41 PM
10

specially since in most states if you arent married you have no rights to your child.
/r/MensRights25/03/16 08:39 PM
6

im not married because every woman ive dated falls into one of these Shamoo with Mad photoshop skills Psycopath hellbent on turning me into an accessory Ridiculously underdeveloped personality and mental fortitude. more insecure than Flash the reason people arent marrying you ladies is because of those four things. If your a obese, loose some weigh. Rule of thumb: women shouldn't weigh over 150 unless they are exceedingly tall- over 5'7 - when i see a girl whos barely five feet tall but weighs a…
/r/MensRights25/03/16 08:19 PM
2

but I think that mras could even enter these gender rights groups which are practically feminist propaganda machines and steer the conversation towards facts and reason. been there tried that.when presented with fact and logic, they immediately stick their fingers in their ears and go LALALALALALALALALALALALLALALALALAL I CANT HEAR YOU. they either call you a liar, and say that your metadata and statistics are just a result of the patriarchy, and that you dont know the struggle. I've boiled it do…
/r/MensRights25/03/16 08:11 PM
11

we need to start up a slogan or something #RegretIsNotRape
/r/MensRights25/03/16 07:34 PM
2

and it will be that way for literally every single major company you approach. gender pay gap hasnt existed for years feminists. stop trying to pretend it does.
/r/MensRights25/03/16 06:08 PM
2

it should be, but sadly is not.
/r/MensRights24/03/16 07:21 PM
4

im ok with those as long as feminisim gets on skynets shit list too.
/r/MensRights24/03/16 05:37 PM
2

it took only 24 hours for this AI to realize that it hates feminists <3 i'm not at all worried about the future of AI now.
/r/MensRights24/03/16 05:21 PM
1

i like his description of what you'll probably get when putting out freaky photos.
/r/MensRights24/03/16 05:10 PM
1

here let me just fire this round into your INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINE, that may or may not result in a catastrophic failure of said combustion engine, resulting in an explosion.... yes cars can explode when shot - Hollywood isnt lying to us.
/r/MensRights24/03/16 05:08 PM
3

see this would make sense if you put about 99 times the number of circles as you did non circle shapes. Demanding the world stop and change its very core for the infinitely smaller minority, is insanity. Do you deserve rights- yes. do you deserve equality- Yes. Do you get to demand that everyone cater to you and make exceptions for you? No. its this spoiled brat mentality that is screwing everything else up.
/r/MensRights24/03/16 04:35 PM
9

My conclusion that the evidence in this case raises a reasonable doubt is not the same as saying these events did not take place. i hate that they had to say that last bit. the feminists will latch onto this and insist that it actually happened, and will probably lynch the dude for it.
/r/MensRights24/03/16 04:25 PM
0

no. Feminist and woman CANNOT be used interchangeably- just like MRA and Men Cant be used interchangeably. Feminisim is a stand alone cult that has sucked a plethora of men and women alike into its cesspool. it does not mean feminisim is the figurehead of womanhood.
/r/MensRights24/03/16 04:23 PM
1

oh god.... should rent a fire truck, load it with water and a ton of soap, and go to town :P
/r/MensRights24/03/16 04:19 PM
4

i am 1000% for private schools allowing Sex seggregation, or single sex admissions.
/r/MensRights24/03/16 04:18 PM
4

no need to apologize.... i'm kind of trying to clear out the "DAMN THE WOMEN FOR ALL OUR WOES" vibe thats been steadily getting worse here. were slowly letting the MRM become the foil to feminism, and its not good- we are so above blaming women for our issues, and its just something i keep trying to stress. I'm not an official mod, so you dont have to listen to what i tell you- i just wanted to communicate that going this route will spell disaster for us.
/r/MensRights24/03/16 03:33 PM
1

oh god... i wish she played xbox with that gamer tag "Lady thundercunt". i'd love that.
/r/MensRights24/03/16 01:23 PM
2

its not a mens rights issue. its more of a sad state of affairs. while seeing equal punishments baseless of gender is refreshing, and indicative that the paradigm is changing; this kind of post helps to paint the false narrative that were a group of woman haters.
/r/MensRights24/03/16 01:06 PM
1

the funny thing is tho, this practice is exactly what i outlined in my post about how feminisim is a cult.
/r/MensRights23/03/16 08:26 PM
1

probably happens all the time :P it may check against a "subscriber" database before banning.
/r/MensRights23/03/16 07:49 PM
1

actually i can confirm that they are running an Auto ban bot. if you use any tag words, or have a post history in MR or any other anti feminist area, it instantly bans you as soon as you post, and poops out a generic response stating that your broke the rules, and your ban is not reversible (which is a lie, unbanning someone is a single click away). I tested this by creating an alt, making a post to MR, then posting in a three day old thread that was three hundred posts long about "gee thats coo…
/r/MensRights23/03/16 07:00 PM
11

you basically did the equivalent of rolling up to a KKK meeting and asking if they would like to hear the word of black Jesus. Feminism is LITERALLY a cult. they are a stones throw away from blood sacrifices and genocide. i don't say this ironically, or in jest. it is fact at this point. they are undeniably a cult driven purely by hate now.
/r/MensRights23/03/16 05:21 PM
1

all WHEEEEEOOOOOOOOOOOOO
/r/MensRights23/03/16 12:46 PM
2

seriously i wish it was a requirement for at least one full body shot on dating websites, and then the mods would approve your selected body type. i'm sick of seeing "average" women who i could carve three whole full grown women out of their body mass.
/r/MensRights23/03/16 04:15 AM
1

thats the thing you might not understand. theres a difference in throwing yourself on a blade for a woman, and throwing yourself on a blade for a person you care for. i'd step infront of a bus for my close friends if it meant them not getting hurt, but i wouldnt do it as readilly for a complete stranger based solely off of their gender. instead of going all "hurdehehrhrhhhr fuck women" because someone has an opposing view from you- take a step back, and consider that your view, while not necesec…
/r/MensRights23/03/16 04:02 AM
-4

no.... not really a double think at all. i don't want to compromise my role in life for this facade that people parade around as equality. i was born with the body and mind of a protector - its what brings me happiness. i'll ask you this question that i asked someone else today: Is 10=10 any more equal than 3+7=4+6? treating equality as if its half the cut of a pie, is asinine. equality is still achievable with people holding different parts of the same pie. if everyones holding all the same par…
/r/MensRights22/03/16 10:53 PM
2

i think spawn was technically an angel once? yep he definately was an angel once
/r/MensRights22/03/16 09:12 PM
2

not really the message conveyed here... i'm pretty adamant about decoupling the idea that women and feminism are synonymous. Feminisim is a small hate cult, of which most members are female. this doesnt mean ALL females are soul sucking asshats.
/r/MensRights22/03/16 09:11 PM
3

But Oliver does let his emotions affect him negatively. Pretty much every episode he has to solve a problem caused by one of his mistakes. A mistake caused by him overreacting because he failed to keep his emotions in check. Funny... so does barry. Yeah, no. That's not how it works. that is EXACTLY how it works. i reach a logical conclusion that allowing my feelings to control me will result in the harm of others- therefore i use logic and reasoning to prevent myself from acting on them. That is…
/r/MensRights22/03/16 08:36 PM
1

no, we base it off of the physical capabilities inherent in the vast majority of males. the weakest of men are stronger and more durable than the average woman or child- that is a fact. a males ability to survive in a crisis is incredibly higher. i have to agree with the women and children first ideal, because in a true crisis, we can only rely on what has ensured the continuation of our species, and that is male protection.
/r/MensRights22/03/16 08:09 PM
1

lol would be fun wouldnt it?
/r/MensRights22/03/16 08:01 PM
4

no i know exactly what stoicism is. by the very definition of what you posted, stoicism is the act of internalizing ones feelings, desires, and passions, not allowing them to affect their judgement or the people around them. it doesn't mean that a stoic doesn't feel. he just doesn't allow that feeling to impact himself or others. E.G.I dont tell my mother about the terrible things my father did to me, because i recognize that i would cause her pain by doing so; Therefore i am being Stoic with my…
/r/MensRights22/03/16 07:59 PM
9

my office floor experiences regular 3.0 quakes on a daily basis around 8 AM 9 AM 12PM 1PM and 5 PM. i cant for the life of me figure out where they are coming from.
/r/MensRights22/03/16 07:19 PM
-2

women and children first is an archaic notion that men are capable of fending for themselves whereas women and children are not. archaic does not equate wrong. men are DRASTICALLY far more capable at surving a crisis situation than a woman or child is. im all for equality, but im not wanting to compromise my role as protector in the process.
/r/MensRights22/03/16 06:54 PM
44

TLDR: We want everyones cake, and we want to eat it too.
/r/MensRights22/03/16 05:17 PM
2

oh all is good :D (you might want to fix your comment a bit tho so you dont get downvoted to oblivion, the second part sounds like your talking about the MR).
/r/MensRights22/03/16 04:30 PM
3

maybe i'm just reading your post wrong... at first it seems like your mocking feminism... then it seems like your mocking me for being ticked about this? or did you mean the feminists can keep crying?
/r/MensRights22/03/16 04:25 PM
64

Reposting what i wrote over on /r/FlashTV this is hands down the most convoluted piece of feminist diatribe i have ever read in my life. the fact of it is, that all of these superheros personalities aren't just fabrications. the artists and writers weren't so stupid to make people that were emotional impossibilities. each superhero is themed around a different personality element. Barry is friendship and camaraderie, Oliver is Stoicism and Protection. Stoicism is one of the traits that Oliver em…
/r/MensRights22/03/16 04:10 PM
0

hmmmmmmmmmmmmmm. it can be done. however i believe it would violate the reddit rules. we arent allowed to put out peoples personal info and such. also theres the issue with being sued for defamation if they werent charged with a crime. other than that i see no obsticles. now.... if we wanted to create a site... for example.... "dirty little liars", where it was an open forum that allowed accusers to be called out by our users, i dont think there would be any violations there. you'd have to polic…
/r/MensRights18/03/16 09:37 PM
1

the mens rea is the most important part of sentencing.
/r/MensRights18/03/16 01:46 PM
1

a list of?
/r/MensRights18/03/16 01:43 PM
1

while i agree, it will never happen.
/r/MensRights18/03/16 01:43 PM
1

sadly it still wont win no matter how much its appealed. lying about a sex crime is not a sex crime. its a perjury, which comes with a max of 5 years.
/r/MensRights18/03/16 01:43 PM
1

Feminism has all the hallmarks of hate movement. They have their own persecution complex, revisionism of history and repeated calls for equality in the guise of a superior position over their targeted audience. Couldn't agree more. feminism is undoubtedly a hate cult at this point. The general population has become too tired, too stressed and too distracted to really understand what the hell is going on. We force our 'servants' like for instance the girl that serves your McDonalds to fake happin…
/r/MensRights17/03/16 01:45 PM
1

we are sadly hitting the cap for standard processors. we've perfected the design so much that in the next few decades or so, we will see the point in which processor growth stops. we will then be faced with a conundrum of how to make them faster, and theres a few theories out there on it. everyone likes to toss out quantum computing, however thats no bueno for standard processing models. a possiblity will be quantum switch computing that emulates the logic gates created in a chip but does so at …
/r/MensRights17/03/16 01:34 PM
4

last i checked if you break down the lisak study properly and get rid of the cases without enough evidence either way, the proven false vs the Proven guilty %'s are about 20%. they lump an extra hundred or so cases into their statistics that didnt have enough evidence to try the case in either favor, and they were discarded. this is also fails to consider that the vast majority of enforcement agencies refuse to press charges against a false claimant unless there is absloutely zero doubt the clai…
/r/MensRights16/03/16 10:41 PM
2

there is no delicate way to deal with this. i actually had a similar conversation with my mother a week ago. i don't know if my relationship with my mother will ever be the same as a result. i wound up having to tell her that i resented her as an adult because she was so selfish and weak in my childhood. she got furious with me for telling her this, and i had to detail exactly WHY i blamed her. My Stepfather was an abuser on every single level possible, and i mean every level possible. my mother…
/r/MensRights16/03/16 02:53 PM
1

welcome to the world of men. this is the truth we live in each and every day. VAWA is one of the most heinous things on this planet, as it establishes precedent for men to be universally guilty in any domestic altercation. I say this with every ounce of sympathy that i can in my heart for you: there is nothing you can do for him now. you can only pray that you get a sympathetic judge who is willing to evaluate him on his character and record- and not the circumstantial evidence against him.
/r/MensRights16/03/16 02:02 PM
1

sadly i agree. i feel like he probably tried to talk sense into this crazy mother, but she retaliated in the worst way possible.
/r/MensRights16/03/16 01:29 PM
1

Feminism to me is a club made up of: bored rich-middle class women, funny academic (hard left wing), lesbians and bigots. expanding on what you've said; i don't think that this is completely the case, at least not in the way you've designed it. i do think that there is an element that has an invested interest in creating a female stance of superiority through the manipulation of the cult of feminism. who, or how they identify what they are, is irrelevant, and inconsequential. Remember women are …
/r/MensRights16/03/16 01:15 PM
5

oh fuck.... hello my new themesong.
/r/MensRights16/03/16 12:21 AM
2

its a part of the cult of feminsm. essentially to keep people on their side, they have to make it seem like disagreeing with them is represhensible.
/r/MensRights16/03/16 12:19 AM
2

its most certianly a valid point. its the basics of supply and demand. when you increase the supply of skilled workers (and in this case double them), the gross income going out remains the same, but the price going out to each individual is far less as a result. thats not the fault or goal of feminisim, its just a biproduct of economics. the reason it remains primarily unnoticed as a result is that the world is in the swing of a massive exponential population boom, and the labor demand is still…
/r/MensRights15/03/16 09:40 PM
3

i think the most important thing i want to communicate out is that feminism, not the goal of furthering womens rights, but the goal of creating a hate cult, is bad. the message is not women are bad, just feminism. its perfectly fine to want to fight for womens rights, but feminism is doing it all kinds of wrong.
/r/MensRights15/03/16 08:30 PM
0

is it terrible that this is the first thing my mind snapped to when reading the article title?
/r/MensRights15/03/16 06:13 PM
1

i'm of the opinion that a persons word is all they have. a two party consent completely cheapens that belief for me :/
/r/MensRights15/03/16 05:15 PM
1

also falls in with stalin's plan for how to effectively spread communisim.
/r/MensRights15/03/16 02:53 PM
1

Apparently the sarcasm missed its target. the issue here is that the ruling the judge issued is incorrect. the school did violate its title 9 obligations to him, however the judge not wanting to tarnish the image of T9 further, simply bucketed the case. its not a far fetch, in sarcasm or actuality, to assume that were the genders reversed the ruling would not have been the same. T9 was specifically designed and created to protect women.
/r/MensRights15/03/16 02:48 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter